UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 01-11350

 

CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

(386) 274-2202

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class of Common Stock Outstanding

July 22, 2016

$1.00 par value 5,796,325

 

 

 

 

---

 

INDEX

 

 

2

---

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

3

---

 

CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4

---

 

CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

5

---

 

CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

6

---

 

CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

7

---

 

CONSOLIDATED-TOMOKA LAND CO.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Unaudited)

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flows:

Income taxes refunded, net of payments made, totaled approximately $58,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2016, while income taxes paid totaled approximately $577,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest totaling approximately $3.5 million and $1.5 million was paid during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. No interest was capitalized during the six months ended June 30, 2016 or 2015, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, in connection with the issuance of the Company’s $75.0 million convertible senior notes due 2020, approximately $2.1 million of the issuance was allocated to the equity component for the conversion option. This non-cash allocation was reflected on the balance sheet as a decrease in long-term debt of approximately $3.4 million and an increase in deferred income taxes of approximately $1.3 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, non-cash compensation includes a reduction in the value of accrued stock-based compensation of approximately $88,000. This portion of non-cash compensation was reflected on the consolidated balance sheet as a decrease in accrued stock-based compensation and on the consolidated income statement as a decrease in general and administrative expenses.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

8

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERIM STATEMENTS

Description of Business

The terms “us,” “we,” “our,” and “the Company” as used in this report refer to Consolidated-Tomoka Land Co. together with our consolidated subsidiaries.      

We are a diversified real estate operating company. We own and manage thirty-seven commercial real estate properties in ten states in the U.S. As of June 30, 2016, we owned twenty-nine single-tenant and eight multi-tenant income-producing properties with over 1,500,000 square feet of gross leasable space. We also own and manage a land portfolio of approximately 10,500 acres. As of June 30, 2016, we had three commercial loan investments including one fixed-rate and one variable–rate mezzanine loan and a variable-rate B-Note representing a secondary tranche in a commercial mortgage loan. Our golf operations consist of the LPGA International golf club, which is managed by a third party. We also lease property for twenty billboards, have agricultural operations that are managed by a third party, which consists of leasing land for hay and sod production, timber harvesting, and hunting leases, and own and manage subsurface interests. The results of our agricultural and subsurface leasing operations are included in Agriculture and Other Income and Real Estate Operations, respectively, in our consolidated statements of operations.

Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which provides a more complete understanding of the Company’s accounting policies, financial position, operating results, business properties, and other matters. The unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company and the results of operations for the interim periods.

The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and other entities in which we have a controlling interest. Any real estate entities or properties included in the consolidated financial statements have been consolidated only for the periods that such entities or properties were owned or under control by us. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interests in consolidated pass-through entities are recognized before income taxes.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, bank demand accounts, and money market accounts having maturities at acquisition date of 90 days or less. The Company’s bank balances as of June 30, 2016 include certain amounts over the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits.

9

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERIM STATEMENTS (continued)

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash totaled approximately $10.6 million at June 30, 2016 of which approximately $9.1 million of cash is being held in escrow, from the sale of an income property and a surface entry right release, to be reinvested through the like-kind exchange structure into one or more other income properties. Approximately $306,000 is being held in a reserve primarily for property taxes and insurance escrows in connection with our financing of two properties acquired in January 2013; approximately $504,000 is being held in three separate escrow accounts related to three separate land transactions of which one closed in December 2013 and two closed in December 2015; approximately $17,000 is being held by the consolidated variable interest entity in which the Company is the primary beneficiary; and approximately $634,000 is being held in a reserve primarily for certain required tenant improvements for the Lowes in Katy, Texas.

Investment Securities

In accordance with ASC Topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, the Company’s debt and equity securities investments have been determined to be equity securities classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in other comprehensive income.

Realized gains and losses, and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary related to equity securities, are included in investment income in the consolidated statements of operations. With respect to debt securities, when the fair value of a debt security classified as available-for-sale is less than its cost, management assesses whether or not: (i) it has the intent to sell the security or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions are met, the Company must recognize an other-than-temporary impairment through earnings for the differences between the debt security’s cost basis and its fair value, and such amount is included in investment income in the consolidated statements of operations. There were no other-than-temporary impairments during the six months ended June 30, 2016 or 2015. During the fourth quarter of 2015, an other-than-temporary impairment was deemed to exist on a portion of the equity securities held by the Company, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $60,000. The Company completed the disposition of its remaining position in investment securities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 resulting in a loss of approximately $576,000.

The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in investment income in the consolidated statements of operations.

The fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale equity securities were measured quarterly, on a recurring basis, using Level 1 inputs, or quoted prices for identical, actively traded assets. The fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale debt securities were measured quarterly, on a recurring basis, using Level 2 inputs.

Derivative Instrument and Hedging Activity

In conjunction with the variable-rate mortgage loan secured by our property located in Raleigh, NC leased to Wells Fargo Bank, NA (“Wells Fargo”), the Company entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate (the “Interest Rate Swap”). The Company accounts for its cash flow hedging derivative in accordance with ASC 815-20 “Derivatives and Hedging”. The derivative is included in Accrued and Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at its fair value. On the date the Interest Rate Swap was entered into, the Company designated the derivative as a hedge of the variability of cash flows to be paid related to the recognized long-term debt liability.

The Company formally documented the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. At the hedge’s inception, the Company formally assessed whether the derivative that is used in hedging the transaction is highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged item, and we will continue to do so on an ongoing basis.

Changes in fair value of the Interest Rate Swap that are highly effective and designated and qualified as a cash-flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income and loss, until earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the designated hedged item.

10

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERIM STATEMENTS (continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s investments in commercial loans approximates fair value at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, since the floating and fixed rates of the loans reasonably approximate current market rates for notes with similar risks and maturities. The carrying value of the Company’s credit facility approximates fair value at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, since the floating rate reasonably approximates current market rates for revolving credit arrangements with similar risks and maturities. The face value of the Company’s fixed rate mortgage notes and convertible debt is measured at fair value based on current market rates for debt instruments with similar risks and maturities, see Note 6, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments.”

Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities is based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:

Classification of Commercial Loan Investments

Loans held for investment are stated at the principal amount outstanding and include the unamortized deferred loan fees offset by any applicable unaccreted purchase discounts and origination fees, if applicable, in accordance with GAAP.

Commercial Loan Investment Impairment

The Company’s commercial loans are held for investment. For each loan, the Company evaluates the performance of the collateral property and the financial and operating capabilities of the borrower/guarantor, in part, to assess whether any deterioration in the credit has occurred and for possible impairment of the loan. Impairment would reflect the Company’s determination that it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan would not be collected. Impairment is measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the effective rate of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Upon determination of an impairment, the Company would record an allowance to reduce the carrying value of the loan with a corresponding recognition of loss in the results of operations. Significant exercise of judgment is required in determining impairment, including assumptions regarding the estimate of expected future cash flows, collectability of the loan, the value of the underlying collateral and other factors including the existence of guarantees. The Company has determined that, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, no allowance for impairment was required.

Recognition of Interest Income from Commercial Loan Investments

Interest income on commercial loan investments includes interest payments made by the borrower and the accretion of purchase discounts and loan origination fees, offset by the amortization of loan costs. Interest payments are accrued based on the actual coupon rate and the outstanding principal balance, and purchase discounts and loan origination fees are accreted into income using the effective yield method, adjusted for prepayments.

11

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERIM STATEMENTS (continued)

Impact Fees and Mitigation Credits

Impact fees and mitigation credits are stated at historical cost. As these assets are sold, the related revenues and cost basis are reported as revenues from, and direct costs of, real estate operations, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable related to income properties, which are classified in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets, primarily consist of tenant reimbursable expenses. Receivables related to tenant reimbursable expenses totaled approximately $494,000 and $831,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Accounts receivable related to real estate operations, which are classified in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets, totaled approximately $3.4 million and $1.3 million as of as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These accounts receivable are related to the reimbursement of certain infrastructure costs completed by the Company in conjunction with three land sale transactions that closed during the fourth quarter of 2015 and one land sale transaction that closed during the first quarter of 2016.

Trade accounts receivable primarily consist of receivables related to golf operations, which are classified in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Trade accounts receivable related to golf operations, which primarily consist of membership and event receivables, totaled approximately $294,000 and $253,000 as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The collectability of the aforementioned receivables is determined based on a review of specifically identified accounts using judgments. As of as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, no allowance for doubtful accounts was required.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisitions of Real Estate Subject to a Lease

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, and the value of leasing costs, based in each case on their relative fair values. The Company has determined that income property purchases with a pre-existing lease at the time of acquisition qualify as a business combination, in which case acquisition costs are expensed in the period the transaction closes. For income property purchases in which a new lease is originated at the time of acquisition, the Company has determined that these asset purchases are outside the scope of the business combination standards and accordingly, the acquisition costs are capitalized with the purchase.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of the fair values of these assets.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease, including the probability of renewal periods. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term unless the Company believes that it is likely that the tenant will renew the option whereby the Company amortizes the value attributable to the renewal over the renewal period.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off. The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.

12

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERIM STATEMENTS (continued)

Sales of Real Estate

Gains and losses on sales of real estate are accounted for as required by the “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate” Topic of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) FASB ASC 976-605-25. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of real estate at the time the sale is consummated, unless the property is sold on a deferred payment plan and the initial payment does not meet established criteria, or the Company retains some form of continuing involvement in the property. As market information becomes available, real estate cost basis is analyzed and recorded at the lower of cost or market.

Adoption of New Accounting Standard

A certain item in the prior period’s consolidated balance sheet has been reclassified to conform to the presentation as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Specifically, upon the adoption of ASU 2015-03, related to simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs effective January 1, 2016, debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization, are required to be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related long-term debt liability. The amount reclassified from other assets to long-term debt was approximately $1.7 million as of December 31, 2015.

NOTE 2. INCOME PROPERTIES

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company acquired one multi-tenant income property, for an acquisition cost of approximately $2.5 million. Of the total acquisition cost, approximately $1.0 million was allocated to land, approximately $1.6 million was allocated to buildings and improvements, approximately $100,000 was allocated to intangible assets pertaining to the in-place lease value and leasing fees, and approximately $200,000 was allocated to intangible liabilities for the below market lease value. The amortization period for the intangible assets and liabilities is approximately 8.3 years. The property acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is described below:

Four income properties were disposed of during the six months ended June 30, 2016 as described below:

An impairment charge of approximately $942,000 was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2016 on the single-tenant income property in Altamonte Springs, Florida leased to PNC Bank as described in Note 8, “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.”

 

13

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 2. INCOME PROPERTIES (continued)

Fourteen single-tenant properties were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2016 which continue to be held for sale as of June 30, 2016 as the sale has not yet closed. Those fourteen properties classified as held for sale are described below:

On April 5, 2016, the Company entered into a 15 year lease with a national fitness center for the anchor space at The Grove at Winter Park located in Winter Park, Florida. The lease is for approximately 40,000 square feet, or 36%, of the 112,000 square foot multi-tenant retail center. On July 6, 2016, the Company funded approximately $4.0 million into an escrow account for customary tenant improvements for the fitness center, which could open as early as the fourth quarter of 2016. The tenant will draw funding from escrow as construction progresses.

One single-tenant income property and one vacant pad site were acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2015 at an aggregate acquisition cost of approximately $9.1 million. Two single-tenant income properties were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2015, for which the sale closed in April 2015. An impairment of approximately $510,000 was charged to earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2015, related to the April 2015 sale as described in Note 8, “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.”

NOTE 3. COMMERCIAL LOAN INVESTMENTS

On May 26, 2016, the Company’s $14.5 million first mortgage loan secured by the Sheraton Old San Juan Hotel located in San Juan, Puerto Rico was paid off at a discount of approximately $218,000. On payoff, the remaining loan origination fee net of loan costs was accreted into income.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the approximately $9.0 million B-Note secured by property in Sarasota, Florida and the $10.0 million mezzanine loan secured by property in Dallas, Texas were extended by the borrowers, each borrower having exercised one-year extension options thereby extending the maturity dates to June 2017 and September 2017, respectively.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company owned three performing commercial loan investments which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $24.0 million. These loans are secured by real estate, or the borrower’s equity interest in real estate, located in Dallas, Texas, Sarasota, Florida, and Atlanta, Georgia and have an average remaining maturity of approximately 1.4 years and a weighted average interest rate of 8.7%.

The Company’s commercial loan investment portfolio was comprised of the following at June 30, 2016:

 

 

14

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 3. COMMERCIAL LOAN INVESTMENTS (continued)

The carrying value of the commercial loan investment portfolio as of June 30, 2016 consisted of the following:

 

 

The Company’s commercial loan investment portfolio was comprised of the following at December 31, 2015:

 

 

The carrying value of the commercial loan investment portfolio as of December 31, 2015 consisted of the following:

 

 

 

NOTE 4. LAND AND SUBSURFACE INTERESTS

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, a total of approximately 7.46 acres of land was sold for approximately $2.2 million as described below:

 

15

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 4. LAND AND SUBSURFACE INTERESTS (continued)

In addition, the gain recognized on the percentage-of-completion basis for the sales within the Town Center, of which approximately 180 of the total 235 acres are developable, is described below. The Town Center infrastructure work was approximately 81% complete as of June 30, 2016. The gain consists of revenue from a portion of the sales price and revenue from expected reimbursement of infrastructure costs, less the allocated cost basis of the infrastructure costs incurred, as the infrastructure work is completed:

 

 

⁽¹⁾ The revenue recognized in each quarter consists of revenue from a portion of the sales price that was previously deferred and revenue from expected reimbursements, as the infrastructure work is completed.

⁽²⁾ The gain recognized in each quarter consists of revenue less the allocated cost basis of the infrastructure costs, as the infrastructure work is completed.

⁽³⁾ The total revenue remaining to be recognized for the above land transactions includes the above approximately $3.9 million of deferred revenue plus an estimated approximately $806,000 of revenue related to the reimbursement of the infrastructure costs to be incurred through completion of the work, less the estimated remaining cost basis of approximately $1.0 million. See Note 18, "Commitments and Contingencies" for a description of the commitments related to the remaining infrastructure costs to be incurred.

The NADG First Parcel and Outparcel sales represent the first two of multiple transactions contemplated under a single purchase and sale agreement (the “NADG Agreement”) with an affiliate of North American Development Group (“NADG”). The NADG Agreement provides NADG with the ability to acquire portions of the remaining acreage under contract within the Town Center (the “Remaining Option Parcels”) in multiple, separate transactions through 2018 (the “Option Period”). The Remaining Option Parcels represent a total of approximately 81.55 acres and total potential proceeds to the Company of approximately $20.2 million, or approximately $248,000 per acre. Pursuant to the NADG Agreement, NADG can close on any and all of the Remaining Option Parcels at any time during the Option Period. The NADG Agreement also establishes a price escalation percentage that would be applied to any of the Remaining Option Parcels that are acquired after January 2017, and an additional price escalation percentage that would be applied to any Remaining Option Parcels acquired in 2018.

Pursuant to the agreements with Tanger, Sam’s Club, and NADG (the “Town Center Sales Agreements”), which together represent the potential sale of the developable acreage in the Town Center, the Company is responsible for the completion of certain infrastructure improvements (the “Infrastructure Work”) at the  Town Center. The Infrastructure Work is currently estimated to cost between $12.5 million and $13.0 million and is expected to be completed in or around October 2016. In connection with the transaction with Tanger, the Company expects to receive approximately $4.5 million for the portion of the Infrastructure Work attributable to the Tanger property from the Tomoka Town Center Community Development District (the “Town Center District”), a special purpose governmental entity, based upon the achievement of certain milestones related to the Infrastructure Work and the Tanger project, and based upon when the Company dedicates the Infrastructure Work to the Town Center District. The payment of the $4.5 million will be recognized into revenue when earned. The Company expects to receive payments, in addition to the sales proceeds from each of the Town Center Sales Agreements (the “Incremental Payments”), including certain fixed annual payments, over the next ten years from Tanger and Sam’s, which annual amounts are included in the estimated gains from the transactions. In aggregate, the majority of the Incremental Payments and the payment received from the Town Center District are expected to largely offset the cost of the Infrastructure Work. As a result of our responsibility for completing the Infrastructure Work, we have applied the percentage of completion basis of accounting to the Tanger Outlet, Sam’s Club and NADG transactions whereby we will recognize the revenue deferred for each transaction as the Infrastructure Work is completed. The Incremental Payments recorded as receivables as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 totaled approximately $3.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and are included as a part of other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

16

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 4. LAND AND SUBSURFACE INTERESTS (continued)

The following table provides a reconciliation of the land transactions closed (as of June 30, 2016) or under contract for all the developable parcels of the Town Center (sales price and estimated infrastructure reimbursement presented in $000’s) and the reimbursement amounts for the Infrastructure Work from each buyer:

 

 

⁽¹⁾ Includes $4.5 million in incentives from the Town Center District, with remainder to be paid in equal installments over 10 years;

⁽²⁾ Infrastructure reimbursement, pursuant to contract, paid in equal installments over 10 years;

⁽³⁾ Infrastructure reimbursement due upon the later of i) Infrastructure Work completion or, ii) August 31, 2016;

⁽⁴⁾ Under Contract. Sales price reflects current contract price; price escalations would occur should any of the transactions close in 2017 and 2018. Infrastructure reimbursements for each Option Parcel occurs upon later of i) transaction closing, ii) Infrastructure Work completion, or iii) August 31, 2016; and

⁽⁵⁾ Includes common area for the Town Center association and land dedicated for public use, both to be conveyed by the Company.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company sold approximately 3.9 acres. On June 1, 2015, the Company sold

approximately 3.0 acres of land located on the south side of LPGA Boulevard, just east of Clyde Morris Boulevard, at a sales price of

$505,000, or approximately $167,000 per acre, for a gain of approximately $476,000. On June 17, 2015, the Company sold approximately 0.9 acres of land located in Highlands County, at a sales price of $250,000 for a gain of approximately $223,000.

For a description of impairment charges totaling approximately $1.0 million on the Company’s undeveloped land during the three months ended June 30, 2016, see Note 8, “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.”

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company acquired, through a real estate venture with an unaffiliated third party institutional investor, an interest in approximately six acres of vacant beachfront property located in Daytona Beach, Florida as more fully described in Note 21, “Variable Interest Entity.”

The Company owns full or fractional subsurface oil, gas, and mineral interests underlying approximately 500,000 “surface” acres of land owned by others in 20 counties in Florida. The Company leases its interests to mineral exploration firms for exploration. Our subsurface operations consist of revenue from the leasing of exploration rights and in some instances additional revenues from royalties applicable to production from the leased acreage.

During November 2015, the Company hired Lantana Advisors, a subsidiary of SunTrust, to evaluate the possible sale of its subsurface interests. On April 13, 2016 the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Land Venture Partners, LLC for the sale of its 500,000 acres of subsurface interests, all located in the state of Florida, including the royalty interests in two operating oil wells in Lee County, Florida and its interests in the oil exploration lease with Kerogen Florida Energy Company LP, for a sales price of approximately $24 million (the “Subsurface Sale”). The purchase and sale agreement contemplates a closing of the Subsurface Sale prior to year-end 2016. The Subsurface Sale, if completed, would result in an estimated gain of approximately $22.6 million, or approximately $2.40 per share, after tax. The Company intends to use the proceeds from this sale as part of a Section 1031 like-kind exchange. The closing of the Subsurface Sale is subject to customary closing conditions. There can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of the Subsurface Sale being completed or the final terms thereof, including the sales price.

During 2011, an eight-year oil exploration lease was executed. The lease calls for annual lease payments which are recognized as revenue ratably over the respective twelve month lease periods. In addition, non-refundable drilling penalty payments are made as required by the drilling requirements in the lease which are recognized as revenue when received. Cash payments for both the annual lease payment and the drilling penalty, if applicable, are received in full on or before the first day of the respective lease year.

17

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 4. LAND AND SUBSURFACE INTERESTS (continued)

Lease payments on the respective acreages and drilling penalties received through lease year five are as follows:

 

 

⁽¹⁾ Cash payment for the Lease Payment and Drilling Penalty is received on or before the first day of the lease year. The Drilling Penalty is recorded as revenue when received, while the Lease Payment is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective lease term. See separate disclosure of the revenue per year below.

The terms of the lease state the Company will receive royalty payments if production occurs, and may receive additional annual rental payments if the lease is continued in years six through eight. The lease is effectively eight one-year terms as the lessee has the option to terminate the lease.

Lease income generated by the annual lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the guaranteed lease term. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, lease income of approximately $303,000 and $465,000, respectively, was recognized. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, lease income of approximately $606,000 and $925,000, respectively, was recognized. There can be no assurance that the oil exploration lease will be extended beyond the expiration of the current term of September 22, 2016 or, if renewed, on similar terms or conditions.

The Company also received oil royalties from operating oil wells on 800 acres under a separate lease with a separate operator. Revenues received from oil royalties totaled approximately $11,000 and $28,000, during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Revenues from oil royalties totaled approximately $16,000 and $49,000, during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company may release surface entry rights or other rights upon request of a surface owner for a negotiated release fee based on a percentage of the surface value. Cash payments for the release of surface entry rights totaled approximately $450,000 and $2,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is included in revenue from real estate operations. The May 2016 transaction for approximately $450,000 reflected gross proceeds net of fees, for the release of the Company’s surface entry rights related to approximately 960 acres of surface rights in Hendry County, Florida. The Company intends to utilize the proceeds from this transaction as part of a like-kind exchange transaction.

 

 

NOTE 5. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company completed the disposition of its remaining position in investment securities, including common stock and debt securities of a publicly traded real estate company, with a total basis of approximately $6.8 million, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $6.3 million, or a loss of approximately $576,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company sold preferred stock of a publicly traded real estate company with a total basis of approximately $704,000 resulting in net proceeds of approximately $835,000, or a gain of approximately $131,000.

The Company had no remaining available-for-sale securities as of June 30, 2016.

18

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 5. INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued)

Available-for-sale securities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2015: 

 

 

⁽¹⁾ The cost basis in the common stock investment is net of an other-than-temporary impairment charge of approximately $60,000 charged to earnings through investment income in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

The gross unrealized loss included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2015 was approximately $1.1 million, net of tax of approximately $433,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, but prior to the disposition of the investment securities, gross unrealized gains of approximately $546,000, net of tax of approximately $211,000, were earned and included in other comprehensive income to reduce the accumulated comprehensive loss balance. The remaining unrealized loss of approximately $576,000, was then realized upon disposition during the six months ended June 30, 2016, and removed from accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax of approximately $222,000, and charged to earnings as an investment loss.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, gross unrealized losses of approximately $106,000, net of tax of approximately $41,000, were recorded through other comprehensive income. The gross unrealized losses of approximately $106,000 include the gross unrealized loss of approximately $120,000, offset by the approximate $14,000 in gross unrealized gains on the preferred stock investments prior to their sale in the first quarter of 2015.   

Following is a table reflecting the sale of investment securities and the gains or losses recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: 

 

 

 

19

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 

 

To determine estimated fair values of the financial instruments listed above, market rates of interest, which include credit assumptions, were used to discount contractual cash flows. The estimated fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following table presents the fair value of assets by Level at December 31, 2015 (there were none as of June 30, 2016):

 

 

 

NOTE 7. INTANGIBLE LEASE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Intangible lease assets and liabilities consist of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, and the value of leasing costs, based in each case on their fair values.

Intangible lease assets and liabilities consisted of the following as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 

 

20

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 7. INTANGIBLE LEASE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (continued)

Total amortization related to intangible lease assets during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately $1.1 million and $718,000, respectively, and was included in depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations. Total amortization related to intangible lease liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $1.2 million and was included as an increase to income properties revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.    

 

The estimated future amortization and accretion of intangible lease assets and liabilities is as follows:

 

 

 

NOTE 8. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The fair value of long-lived assets required to be assessed for impairment is determined on a non-recurring basis using Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. These Level 3 inputs may include, but are not limited to, executed purchase and sale agreements on specific properties, third party valuations, discounted cash flow models, and other model-based techniques.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, an impairment charge of approximately $942,000 was recognized on an income property in Altamonte Springs, Florida leased to PNC Bank under contract for sale as of June 30, 2016. The total impairment charge represents the anticipated loss on the sale of approximately $783,000 plus estimated closing costs of approximately $159,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, an impairment charge of approximately $717,000 was recognized on approximately 4 of the approximately 6 acres of undeveloped land in Daytona Beach, Florida for which a contract for sale was executed during the three months ended June 30, 2016. Such acreage was repurchased in prior years by the Company and carried a higher cost basis than the remainder of the Company’s historical land holdings. The total impairment charge represents the anticipated loss on the sale of approximately $646,000 plus estimated closing costs of approximately $71,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, an impairment charge of approximately $311,000 was recognized on approximately 4 acres of undeveloped land in Daytona Beach, Florida for which a contract for sale was executed subsequent to June 30, 2016. Such acreage was repurchased in a prior year by the Company and carried a higher cost basis than the remainder of the Company’s historical land holdings. The total impairment charge represents the anticipated loss on the sale of approximately $256,000 plus estimated closing costs of approximately $55,000.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, an impairment charge of approximately $210,000 was recognized on an income property held for sale as of March 31, 2016 for which the sale closed on April 6, 2016, as described in Note 2, “Income Properties.” The total impairment charge represented the loss on the sale of approximately $134,000 plus closing costs of approximately $76,000.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, an impairment charge of approximately $510,000 was recognized on two income properties held for sale as of March 31, 2015, for which the sale closed on April 17, 2015. The total impairment charge represented the loss on the sale of approximately $277,000 plus estimated closing costs of approximately $233,000.

 

21

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 9. OTHER ASSETS

Other assets consisted of the following:

 

 

NOTE 10. COMMON STOCK AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is based on the assumption of the conversion of stock options and vesting of restricted stock at the beginning of each period using the treasury stock method at average cost for the periods.

 

 

The effect of 81,250 and 87,500 potentially dilutive securities were not included for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, as the effect would be antidilutive. The effect of 25,000 and 40,200 potentially dilutive securities were not included for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, as the effect would be antidilutive.

The Company intends to settle its 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Notes”) in cash upon conversion with any excess conversion value to be settled in shares of our common stock. Therefore, only the amount in excess of the par value of the Notes will be included in our calculation of diluted net income per share using the treasury stock method. As such, the Notes have no impact on diluted net income per share until the price of our common stock exceeds the conversion price of $68.90. The average price of our common stock during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 did not exceed the conversion price which resulted in no additional diluted outstanding shares.

 

NOTE 11. TREASURY STOCK

In November 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase from time to time up to $8 million of its common stock. There was no expiration date for the repurchase authorization. The Company repurchased 4,660 shares of its common stock at a cost of approximately $105,000 through December 31, 2013 and those shares were retired. During 2014, the Company repurchased an additional 25,836 shares of its common stock on the open market for a total cost of approximately $928,000, or an average price per share of $35.92, and placed those shares in treasury. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased an additional 119,403 shares of its common stock on the open market for a total cost of approximately $6.5 million, or an average price per share of $54.31, and placed those shares in treasury, thereby completing the $8 million share repurchase program.

22

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 11. TREASURY STOCK (continued)

In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company also announced a new $10 million stock repurchase program. Under the new $10 million repurchase program, during the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 62,751 shares of its common stock on the open market for a total cost of approximately $3.0 million, or an average price per share of $47.78, and placed those shares in treasury.

 

NOTE 12. LONG-TERM DEBT

Credit Facility. The Company has a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Bank of Montreal (“BMO”) as the administrative agent for the lenders thereunder. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The Credit Facility bank group is led by BMO and also includes Wells Fargo and Branch Banking & Trust Company. The Credit Facility matures on August 1, 2018 with the ability to extend the term for 1 year.

The Credit Facility has a total borrowing capacity of $75.0 million with the ability to increase that capacity up to $125.0 million during the term. The Credit Facility provides the lenders with a secured interest in the equity of the Company subsidiaries that own the properties included in the borrowing base. The indebtedness outstanding under the Credit Facility accrues interest at a rate ranging from the 30-day LIBOR plus 135 basis points to the 30-day LIBOR plus 225 basis points based on the total balance outstanding under the Credit Facility as a percentage of the total asset value of the Company, as defined in the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility also accrues a fee of 20 to 25 basis points for any unused portion of the borrowing capacity based on whether the unused portion is greater or less than 50% of the total borrowing capacity.

At June 30, 2016, the current commitment level under the Credit Facility was $75.0 million. The available borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was approximately $42.3 million subject to the borrowing base requirements. As of May 13, 2016, the Credit Facility had a zero balance after the Company had paid off all outstanding draws.

On March 21, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment of the Credit Facility (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment modified certain terms of the Company’s Credit Facility effective as of September 30, 2015, including, among other things, (i) modifying certain non-cash or non-recurring items in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility, and eliminating stock repurchases from the calculation of fixed charges, both of which are part of the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio financial covenant, (ii) the addition of a measure for the fixed charge coverage ratio that must be met before the Company may repurchase shares of its own stock, and (iii) providing a consent of the lenders regarding the amount of the Company’s stock repurchases since the third quarter of 2015. 

On April 13, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment of the Credit Facility (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment modified section 8.8(n) of the Credit Facility which pertains to permitted stock repurchases by the Company, by, among other things, (i) adding the gains from the sale of unimproved land, including the sale of subsurface interests or the release of surface entry rights, net of taxes incurred in connection with the sale, to the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, for the purpose of determining the coverage ratio that must be met before the Company may repurchase shares of its own stock, and (ii) reducing the coverage ratio that must be met before the Company may repurchase shares of its own stock pursuant to section 8.8(n) from 1.75x to 1.50x. As of the date of the Second Amendment, the Company meets the required coverage ratio; therefore, subject to black-out periods and other restrictions applicable to share repurchases, the Company will be able to continue to make additional repurchases of its own common stock under its existing $10 million repurchase program.

The Credit Facility is subject to customary restrictive covenants, including, but not limited to, limitations on the Company’s ability to: (a) incur indebtedness; (b) make certain investments; (c) incur certain liens; (d) engage in certain affiliate transactions; and (e) engage in certain major transactions such as mergers. In addition, the Company is subject to various financial maintenance covenants, including, but not limited to, a maximum indebtedness ratio, a maximum secured indebtedness ratio, and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also contains affirmative covenants and events of default, including, but not limited to, a cross default to the Company’s other indebtedness and upon the occurrence of a change of control. The Company’s failure to comply with these covenants or the occurrence of an event of default could result in acceleration of the Company’s debt and other financial obligations under the Credit Facility.

23

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 12. LONG-TERM DEBT (continued)

Mortgage Notes Payable. On February 22, 2013, the Company closed on a $7.3 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., secured by its interest in the two-building office complex leased to Hilton Resorts Corporation, which was acquired on January 31, 2013. The mortgage loan matures in February 2018, carries a fixed rate of interest of 3.655% per annum, and requires payments of interest only prior to maturity.

On March 8, 2013, the Company closed on a $23.1 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with Bank of America, N.A., secured by its interest in fourteen income properties. The mortgage loan matures in April 2023, carries a fixed rate of 3.67% per annum, and requires payments of interest only prior to maturity.

On September 30, 2014, the Company closed on a $30.0 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with Wells Fargo, secured by its interest in six income properties. The mortgage loan matures in October 2034, and carries a fixed rate of 4.33% per annum during the first ten years of the term, and requires payments of interest only during the first ten years of the loan. After the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the loan, the cash flows generated by the underlying six income properties must be used to pay down the principal balance of the loan until paid off or until the loan matures. The loan is fully pre-payable after the tenth anniversary date of the effective date of the loan.

On April 15, 2016, the Company closed on a $25.0 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with Wells Fargo, secured by the Company’s income property leased to Wells Fargo located in Raleigh, North Carolina. The mortgage loan has a 5-year term with two years interest only, and interest and a 25-year amortization for the balance of the term. The mortgage loan, bears a variable rate of interest based on the 30-day LIBOR plus a rate of 190 basis points. The interest rate for this mortgage loan has been fixed through the use of an interest rate swap that fixed the rate at 3.17%. The mortgage loan can be prepaid at any time subject to the termination of the interest rate swap.

Convertible Debt. On March 11, 2015, the Company issued $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Notes”). The Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.50% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2015. The Notes will mature on March 15, 2020, unless earlier purchased or converted. The initial conversion rate is 14.5136 shares of common stock for each $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $68.90 per share of common stock.

The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Holders may not surrender their Notes for conversion prior to December 15, 2019 except upon the occurrence of certain conditions relating to the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock, the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, or specified corporate events. The Company may not redeem the Notes prior to the stated maturity date and no sinking fund is provided for the Notes. The Notes are convertible, at the election of the Company, into solely cash, solely shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company intends to settle the Notes in cash upon conversion with any excess conversion value to be settled in shares of our common stock. In accordance with GAAP, the Notes are accounted for as a liability with a separate equity component recorded for the conversion option. A liability was recorded for the Notes on the issuance date at fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current market rates for debt instruments with similar terms. The difference between the initial proceeds from the Notes and the estimated fair value of the debt instruments resulted in a debt discount, with an offset recorded to additional paid-in capital representing the equity component. The discount on the Notes was approximately $6.1 million at issuance, which represents the cash discount paid of approximately $2.6 million and the approximate $3.5 million attributable to the value of the conversion option recorded in equity, which is being amortized into interest expense through the maturity date of the Notes. As of June 30, 2016 the unamortized debt discount of our Notes was approximately $4.7 million.

Net proceeds from issuance of the Notes was approximately $72.4 million (net of the cash discount paid of approximately $2.6 million) of which approximately $47.5 million was used to repay the outstanding balance of our Credit Facility as of March 11, 2015. We utilized the remaining amount for investments in income-producing properties or investments in commercial loans secured by commercial real estate.

24

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 12. LONG-TERM DEBT (continued)

Long-term debt consisted of the following: 

 

 

Payments applicable to reduction of principal amounts will be required as follows:

 

 

The carrying value of long-term debt as of June 30, 2016 consisted of the following:

 

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, interest expense, excluding amortization of loan costs and debt discounts, was approximately $1.8 million with approximately $801,000 paid during the period. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, interest expense, excluding amortization of loan costs and debt discounts, was approximately $3.5 million with approximately $3.5 million paid during the quarter.  No interest was capitalized during the three or six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2015, interest expense, excluding amortization of loan costs and debt discounts, was approximately $1.5 million with approximately $665,000 paid during the period. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, interest expense, excluding amortization of loan costs and debt discounts, was approximately $2.5 million with approximately $1.5 million paid during the period.  No interest was capitalized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

The amortization of loan costs incurred in connection with the Company’s long-term debt is included in interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. Loan costs are amortized over the term of the respective loan agreements using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the amortization of loan costs totaled approximately $125,000 and $94,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the amortization of loan costs totaled approximately $227,000 and $167,000, respectively.

The amortization of the approximately $6.1 million discount on the Notes is also included in interest expense in the consolidated financial statements. The discount is amortized over the term of the Notes using the effective interest method. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 the amortization of the discount totaled approximately $278,000 and $293,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 the amortization of the discount totaled approximately $551,000 and $318,000, respectively.

25

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 12. LONG-TERM DEBT (continued)

The Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants as of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants but for a default with respect to a covenant under the Credit Facility which requires the Company to maintain a borrowing base value of $75 million for income properties included in the borrowing base. Subsequent to our disposition of the income property leased to Lowe’s in Lexington, North Carolina in June 2016, the value of income properties on the borrowing base was approximately $71 million. The total value of the calculated borrowing base was also impacted by a provision of the Credit Facility which limits the value for a single income property to no more than 20% of the total borrowing base value. As a result, our $25.1 million investment in the 245 Riverside property in Jacksonville, Florida, which is included in the borrowing base, had a value of approximately $14 million in the borrowing base calculation. The Company obtained a waiver from the lending group effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company adds one or more properties to the borrowing base sufficient to establish compliance with the covenant or (ii) December 31, 2016. As of May 13, 2016, the Credit Facility had a zero balance after the Company paid off all outstanding draws. If the Company fails to become compliant with the covenant by December 31, 2016, its liquidity could be adversely affected if another waiver from the lending group is not obtained or the lending group elects to terminate the Credit Facility. The Company expects to become compliant with the covenant through the acquisition of income-producing properties prior to December 31, 2016. As of July 29, 2016, the Company is under contract to acquire certain income-producing properties, some of which we expect to close before the end of the third quarter 2016. We expect the acquisition of these properties would result in the Company satisfying the borrowing base covenant; however, there can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of any one of these potential acquisition transactions being completed or the final terms thereof.

NOTE 13. INTEREST RATE SWAP

During April 2016, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge cash flows tied to changes in the underlying floating interest rate tied to LIBOR for the $25.0 mortgage note payable as discussed in Note 12, “Long-Term Debt.” During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the interest rate swap agreement was 100% effective. Accordingly, the change in fair value on the interest rate swap has been classified in accumulated other comprehensive loss. As of June 30, 2016, the fair value of our interest rate swap agreement, which was a loss of approximately $546,000, was included in accrued and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The interest rate swap was effective on April 7, 2016 and matures on April 7, 2021. The interest rate swap fixed the variable rate debt on the notional amount of related debt of $25.0 million to a rate of 3.17%.

NOTE 14. ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES

Accrued and other liabilities consisted of the following: 

26

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 14. ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES (continued)

In July 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with the City of Daytona Beach, Florida (the “City”) to, among other things, amend the lease payments under its golf course lease (the “Lease Amendment”). Under the Lease Amendment, the base rent payment, which was scheduled to increase from $250,000 to $500,000 as of September 1, 2012, will remain at $250,000 for the remainder of the lease term and any extensions would be subject to an annual rate increase of 1.75% beginning September 1, 2013. The Company also agreed to invest $200,000 prior to September 1, 2015 for certain improvements to the facilities. In addition, pursuant to the Lease Amendment, beginning September 1, 2012, and continuing throughout the initial lease term and any extension option, the Company will pay additional rent to the City equal to 5.0% of gross revenues exceeding $5,500,000 and 7.0% of gross revenues exceeding $6,500,000. Since the inception of the lease, the Company has recognized the rent expense on a straight-line basis resulting in an estimated accrual for deferred rent. Upon the effective date of the Lease Amendment, the Company’s straight-line rent was revised to reflect the lower rent levels through expiration of the lease. As a result, approximately $3.0 million of the rent previously deferred will not be due to the City, and will be recognized into income over the remaining lease term, which expires in 2022. As of June 30, 2016, approximately $1.5 million of the rent previously deferred that will not be due to the City remained to be amortized through September 2022.

In connection with the acquisition of the Lowes on April 22, 2014, the Company was credited approximately $651,000 at closing for certain required tenant improvements, some of which are not required to be completed until December 2016. As of June 30, 2016, approximately $100,000 of these tenant improvements had been completed and funded, leaving approximately $551,000 remaining to be funded.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company accrued an environmental reserve of approximately $110,000 in connection with an estimate of additional costs required to monitor a parcel of less than one acre of land owned by the Company in Highlands County, Florida on which environmental remediation work had previously been performed. The Company engaged legal counsel who, in turn, engaged environmental engineers to review the site and the prior monitoring test results. During the year ended December 31, 2015, their review was completed, and the Company made an additional accrual of approximately $500,000, representing the low end of the range of possible costs estimated by the engineers to be between $500,000 and $1.0 million to resolve this matter subject to the approval of the state department of environmental protection (the “FDEP”). The FDEP has preliminarily accepted the Company’s proposed remediation plan which supports the approximate $500,000 accrual. Since the initial accrual of approximately $110,000 was made, approximately $129,000 in costs have been incurred through June 30, 2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company accrued $187,500 for the estimated penalty associated with a regulatory matter pertaining to the Company’s prior agricultural activities on certain of the Company’s land located in Daytona Beach, Florida. Additionally, as part of the resolution of the regulatory matter, as of December 31, 2015, the Company accrued an obligation of approximately $1.7 million, representing the low end of the estimated range of possible wetlands restoration costs for approximately 148.35 acres within such land, and included such estimated costs on the consolidated balance sheets as an increase in the basis of our land and development costs associated with those and benefitting surrounding acres. The final proposal for restoration work was received during the three months ended June 30, 2016 which totaled approximately $2.0 million. Accordingly, an increase in the accrual of approximately $300,000 was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Company funded approximately $590,000 of the total $2.0 million of estimated costs during the three months ended June 30, 2016. This matter is more fully described in Note 18 “Commitments and Contingencies”.

 

NOTE 15. DEFERRED REVENUE

Deferred revenue consisted of the following:

 

On September 22, 2015, the Company received an approximate $1.2 million rent payment for the fifth year of the Company’s eight-year oil exploration lease, which is being recognized ratably over the twelve month lease period ending in September 2016.

27

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 15. DEFERRED REVENUE (continued)

In connection with the 98.69 acres of land sales in the Town Center which closed during the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, approximately $3.9 million of the aggregate $21.4 million sales price is deferred as of June 30, 2016 to be recognized as revenue on a percentage-of-completion basis as the required infrastructure costs are completed. The estimated completion date in or around October 2016.

 

NOTE 16. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

EQUITY-CLASSIFIED STOCK COMPENSATION

Market Condition Restricted Shares – Peer Group Vesting

Under the Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) in September 2010 and January 2011, the Company granted to certain employees restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, which would vest upon the achievement of certain market conditions, including thresholds relating to the Company’s total shareholder return as compared to the total shareholder return of a certain peer group during a five-year performance period.

The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model to determine the fair value of its awards that are based on market conditions. The determination of the fair value of market condition-based awards is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of other variables. These variables include expected stock price volatility over the requisite performance term of the awards, the relative performance of the Company’s stock price and shareholder returns to companies in its peer group, annual dividends, and a risk-free interest rate assumption. Compensation cost is recognized regardless of the achievement of the market conditions, provided the requisite service period is met.

A summary of activity during the six months ended June 30, 2016, is presented below: 

 

 

As of June 30, 2016, there is no unrecognized compensation cost as there are no outstanding shares remaining.

Market Condition Restricted Shares – Stock Price Vesting

“Inducement” grants of 96,000 and 17,000 shares of restricted Company common stock were awarded to Mr. Albright and Mr. Patten in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Mr. Albright’s restricted shares were granted outside of the 2010 Plan while Mr. Patten’s restricted shares were awarded under the 2010 Plan. The Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-8 to register the resale of Mr. Albright’s restricted stock award. The restricted shares will vest in six increments based upon the price per share of the Company’s common stock during the term of their employment (or within sixty days after termination of employment by the Company without cause) meeting or exceeding the target trailing sixty-day average closing prices ranging from $36 per share for the first increment to $65 per share for the final increment. If any increment of the restricted shares fails to satisfy the applicable stock price condition prior to six years from the grant date, that increment of the restricted shares will be forfeited. As of June 30, 2016, four increments of Mr. Albright’s and Mr. Patten’s grants had vested.

Additional grants of 2,500 and 3,000 shares of restricted Company common stock were awarded to Mr. Smith and another officer under the 2010 Plan, during the fourth quarter of 2014 and the first quarter of 2015, respectively. The restricted stock will vest in two increments based upon the price per share of Company common stock during the term of their employment (or within sixty days after termination of employment by the Company without cause), meeting or exceeding the target trailing sixty-day average closing prices of $60 per share and $65 per share for the two increments. If any increment of the restricted shares fails to satisfy the applicable stock price condition prior to six years from the grant date, that increment of the restricted shares will be forfeited. As of June 30, 2016, no increments of Mr. Smith’s or the other officer’s grants had vested.

28

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 16. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

A grant of 94,000 shares of restricted Company common stock was awarded to Mr. Albright under the 2010 Plan during the second quarter of 2015. As more fully described at the end of Note 16 “Stock-Based Compensation,” on February 26, 2016, 72,000 of these shares were surrendered, of which 4,000 were re-granted on February 26, 2016 with identical terms of the surrendered common stock and 68,000 were permanently surrendered.  The 26,000 shares of restricted Company common stock outstanding from these grants will vest in seven increments based upon the price per share of Company common stock during the term of his employment (or within sixty days after termination of employment by the Company without cause), meeting or exceeding the target trailing thirty-day average closing prices ranging from $60 per share for the first increment to $75 per share for the final increment. If any increment of the restricted shares fails to satisfy the applicable stock price condition prior to January 28, 2021, that increment of the restricted shares will be forfeited. As of June 30, 2016, no increments of this grant had vested.

On February 26, 2016, the Company entered into amendments to the employment agreements and certain restricted share award agreements to clarify the Company’s intention that the restricted shares granted thereunder, if they are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, will fully vest at any time during the 24-month period following a change in control and termination of the employee subsequent to the change in control.

The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation pricing model to determine the fair value of its awards that are based on market conditions. The determination of the fair value of market condition-based awards is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of other variables. These variables include expected stock price volatility over the requisite performance term of the awards, the relative performance of the Company’s stock price and shareholder returns to companies in its peer group, annual dividends, and a risk-free interest rate assumption. Compensation cost is recognized regardless of the achievement of the market conditions, provided the requisite service period is met.

A summary of the activity for these awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016, is presented below:

 

 

In connection with the permanent surrender of 68,000 shares of restricted Company common stock, approximately $1.6 million of related stock-based compensation expense was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2016 to accelerate the remaining expense pertaining the total grant date fair value of these awards.

 

As of June 30, 2016, there was approximately $160,000 of unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to market condition non-vested restricted shares, which will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 0.2 years.

Three Year Vest Restricted Shares

On January 22, 2014, the Company granted to certain employees 14,500 shares of restricted Company common stock under the 2010 Plan. One-third of the restricted shares will vest on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date, provided the grantee is an employee of the Company on those dates. In addition, any unvested portion of the restricted shares will vest upon a change in control.

On January 28, 2015, the Company granted to certain employees, which did not include Mr. Albright, 11,700 shares of restricted Company common stock under the 2010 Plan. Additionally, on February 9, 2015, the Company granted 8,000 shares of restricted Company common stock to Mr. Albright under the 2010 Plan. One-third of both awards of restricted shares will vest on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the January 28, 2015 grant date, provided the grantee is an employee of the Company on those dates. In addition, any unvested portion of the restricted shares will vest upon a change in control.

29

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 16. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

On January 27, 2016, the Company granted to certain employees 21,100 shares of restricted Company common stock under the 2010 Plan. One-third of the restricted shares will vest on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of January 28, 2016, provided the grantee is an employee of the Company on those dates. In addition, any unvested portion of the restricted shares will vest upon a change in control.

The Company’s determination of the fair value of the three year vest restricted stock awards was calculated by multiplying the number of shares issued by the Company’s stock price at the grant date, less the present value of expected dividends during the vesting period. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.

A summary of activity during the six months ended June 30, 2016, is presented below:

 

 

As of June 30, 2016, there was approximately $1.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, related to the three year vest non-vested restricted shares, which will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 2.1 years.

Non-Qualified Stock Option Awards

Pursuant to the Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreements between the Company and Messrs. Albright, Patten, and Smith, each of these Company employees was granted an option to purchase 50,000, 10,000, and 10,000 shares of Company common stock, in 2011, 2012, and 2014, respectively, under the 2010 Plan with an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value on their respective grant dates. One-third of the options will vest on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of their respective grant dates, provided the recipient is an employee of the Company on those dates. In addition, any unvested portion of the options will vest upon a change in control. The options expire on the earliest of: (a) the tenth anniversary of the grant date; (b) twelve months after the employee’s death or termination for disability; or (c) thirty days after the termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability.

On January 23, 2013, the Company granted options to purchase 51,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2010 Plan to certain employees of the Company, including 10,000 shares to Mr. Patten, with an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value at the date of grant. One-third of these options vested on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date, provided the recipient was an employee of the Company on those dates. The options expire on the earliest of: (a) the fifth anniversary of the grant date; (b) twelve months after the employee’s death or termination for disability; or (c) thirty days after the termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability.

On February 9, 2015, the Company granted to Mr. Albright an option to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2010 Plan with an exercise price of $57.50. The option vested on January 28, 2016. The option expires on the earliest of: (a) January 28, 2025; (b) twelve months after the employee’s death or termination for disability; or (c) thirty days after the termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability.

On May 20, 2015, the Company granted to Mr. Albright an option to purchase 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2010 Plan, with an exercise price of $55.62. As more fully described at the end of Note 16 “Stock-Based Compensation,” on February 26, 2016, this option  was surrendered and an option to purchase 40,000 shares was granted on February 26, 2016 with identical terms. One-third of the option vested immediately and the remaining two-thirds will vest on January 28, 2017 and January 28, 2018, provided he is an employee of the Company on such dates. In addition, any unvested portion of the option will vest upon a change in control. The option expires on the earliest of: (a) January 28, 2025; (b) twelve months after the employee’s death or termination for disability; or (c) thirty days after the termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability.

30

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 16. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

On June 29, 2015, the Company granted to an officer of the Company an option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock under the 2010 Plan, with an exercise price of $57.54. One-third of the option will vest on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date, provided the recipient is an employee of the Company on such dates. In addition, any unvested portion of the option will vest upon a change in control. The option expires on the earliest of: (a) June 29, 2025; (b) twelve months after the employee’s death or termination for disability; or (c) thirty days after the termination of employment for any reason other than death or disability.

The Company used the Black-Scholes valuation pricing model to determine the fair value of its non-qualified stock option awards. The determination of the fair value of the awards is affected by the stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of other variables. These variables include expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, annual dividends, and a risk-free interest rate assumption.

A summary of the activity for the awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016, is presented below: 

 

 

A summary of the non-vested options for these awards during the six months ended June 30, 2016, is presented below: 

 

 

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $13.97 per share. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $30,000. As of June 30, 2016, there was approximately $494,000 of unrecognized compensation related to non-qualified, non-vested stock option awards, which will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 1.8 years.

LIABILITY-CLASSIFIED STOCK COMPENSATION

The Company previously had a stock option plan (the “2001 Plan”) pursuant to which 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were eligible for issuance. The 2001 Plan expired in 2010, and no new stock options may be issued under the 2001 Plan. Under the 2001 Plan, both stock options and stock appreciation rights were issued in prior years and such issuances were deemed to be liability-classified awards under the Share-Based Payment Topic of FASB ASC, which are required to be remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date until the award is settled.

31

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 16. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

A summary of share option activity under the 2001 Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is presented below:

Stock Options

 

 

In connection with the grant of non-qualified stock options, a stock appreciation right for each share covered by the option was also granted. The stock appreciation right entitles the optionee to receive a supplemental payment, which may be paid in whole or in part in cash or in shares of common stock, equal to a portion of the spread between the exercise price and the fair market value of the underlying shares at the time of exercise. No options were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2016. All options had vested as of December 31, 2013.

Stock Appreciation Rights

 

 

No stock appreciation rights were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2016. All stock appreciation rights had vested as of December 31, 2013.

The fair value of each share option and stock appreciation right is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company and other factors. The Company has elected to use the simplified method of estimating the expected term of the options and stock appreciation rights.

Due to the small number of employees included in the 2001 Plan, the Company uses the specific identification method to estimate forfeitures and includes all participants in one group. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the share option is based on the U.S. Treasury rates in effect at the time of measurement. The Company issues new, previously unissued, shares as options are exercised.

32

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 16. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

Following are assumptions used in determining the fair value of stock options and stock appreciation rights:

 

 

There were no stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 2001 Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2016 or 2015. The liability for stock options and stock appreciation rights, valued at fair value, reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was approximately $48,000 and $136,000, respectively. These fair value measurements are based on Level 2 inputs based on Black-Scholes and market implied volatility. The Black-Scholes determination of fair value is affected by variables including stock price, expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, annual dividends, and a risk-free interest rate assumption.

Amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements for stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock are as follows:

 

As described above, in January 2015, the Compensation Committee awarded to Mr. Albright 8,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. In February 2015, the Compensation Committee awarded to Mr. Albright options to purchase a total of 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In May 2015, in connection with the extension of Mr. Albright’s employment agreement, the Compensation Committee awarded to Mr. Albright 94,000 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock (the “May 2015 Restricted Share Grant”) and options to purchase a total of 40,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “May 2015 Option Grant”). Each of these awards were approved by the Company’s Board.  

Upon review of the total grant awards to Mr. Albright in 2015 it was determined that the annual per person award limit under the 2010 Plan was inadvertently exceeded. In determining the extent to which the 2010 Plan’s individual annual award limit had been exceeded by the above awards, the Compensation Committee, as the administrator of the 2010 Plan, identified a conflict between Sections 3(d) and 3(e) of the 2010 Plan, the relevant provisions which provide limitations of the 2010 Plan. Section 3(d) of the 2010 Plan could be read to provide an overall limit of 50,000 shares applicable to all awards granted to a participant in any calendar year; however, the Compensation Committee could not disregard Section 3(e) of the 2010 Plan. Section 3(e) could be read to provide for two additional limits of 50,000 shares each for any (a) “Qualified Performance-Based Awards” (as defined in the 2010 Plan) constituting stock options and stock appreciation rights and (b) “Qualified Performance-Based Awards” other than stock options and stock appreciation rights. If the Compensation Committee were to determine that Section 3(e) of the 2010 Plan provides the applicable limits for two categories of “Qualified Performance-Based Awards,” then the Compensation Committee could conclude that Section 3(d) of the 2010 Plan provides the limit for awards other than Qualified Performance-Based Awards.

 

The Compensation Committee consulted with outside advisors and determined that it was not possible to conclude which interpretation of the 2010 Plan was conclusively correct. Pursuant to its authority to interpret the 2010 Plan, the Compensation Committee elected to comply with the limit in Section 3(d) of the 2010 Plan. As a result of applying this interpretation of the 2010 Plan, the awards granted to Mr. Albright in 2015 exceeded the 2010 Plan’s individual annual award limit by 112,000 shares of our common stock (the “Excess 2015 Awards”).

33

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 16. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (continued)

On February 26, 2016, the Company notified the NYSE MKT (i) that the Excess 2015 Awards may have violated Rule 711 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide and (ii) of the Company and Mr. Albright’s intention to rectify the Excess 2015 Awards in the manner described below. On March 4, 2016, the NYSE MKT notified the Company that it would not take any action and considered the matter closed.

In consultation with the Board, Mr. Albright elected to rectify the Excess 2015 Awards by surrendering, in full, the May 2015 Option Grant and surrendering, in part, the May 2015 Restricted Share Grant. A portion of the surrendered awards has been replaced with new awards under the 2010 Plan in 2016. Effective as of February 26, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Albright (i) an option to purchase an additional 40,000 shares of our common stock under the 2010 Plan (the “New Option Grant”) and (ii) a grant of 4,000 restricted shares of our common stock (the “New Restricted Share Grant”).

The New Option Grant has an exercise price per share of $55.62, which is equal to the exercise price per share applicable to the May 2015 Option Grant. This option is intended to have the same vesting terms as the May 2015 Option Grant, and as a result has vested with respect to 13,200 shares and will vest with respect to 13,200 shares and 13,600 shares on January 28, 2017 and January 28, 2018, respectively. The New Restricted Share Grant is intended to have the same vesting terms as the May 2015 Restricted Share Grant, and as a result will vest upon the price per share of Company common stock during the term of Mr. Albright’s employment (or within 60 days after termination of his employment by the Company other than for cause, due to death or disability or due to his voluntary resignation) meeting or exceeding the target trailing 30-day average closing price of $75 per share. If the restricted shares fail to satisfy the stock price condition prior to January 28, 2021, the restricted shares will be forfeited. Any unvested restricted shares will vest immediately upon Mr. Albright’s termination of employment without Cause or for his resignation for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in his amended and restated employment agreement), in each case, at any time during the 24-month period following a change in control. Mr. Albright has the right to vote the restricted shares prior to their vesting but is not entitled to dividends paid on any unvested shares. These restricted shares have not yet vested.

Because the Excess 2015 Awards exceeded the 2010 Plan limits, the grants do not qualify, for purposes of calculating the Code Section 162(m) compensation for Mr. Albright for tax purposes, as performance-based awards.

As noted herein, 112,000 shares of the awards granted to Mr. Albright in 2015 exceeded the limits of the 2010 Plan. However, when granted these shares were issued and outstanding as of their grant date and all legal requirements for their issuance under Florida law and the Company’s organizational documents were fulfilled and Mr. Albright’s ability to enforce his rights to such grants could not be negated or otherwise impaired. All requirements under ASC 718-10-20 were met, including a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of the awards, the company was contingently liable to issue the awards, and all required approvals for the awards to be legally issued and outstanding were obtained as of the grant date. Consequently, the 112,000 shares were deemed appropriately reflected as stock compensation expense as of the year ended December 31, 2015. 

 

Effective as of February 26, 2016, the Company entered into amendments to the employment agreements and certain restricted share award agreements of Messrs. Albright, Patten, and Smith to clarify the Company’s intention that the restricted shares granted thereunder, if they are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, will fully vest upon the executive’s termination of employment without cause or his resignation for good reason (as such terms are defined in his employment agreement), in each case, at any time during the 24-month period following a change in control. There was no impact to the valuation established at the original date of grant of the modification of the restricted share award agreements of Messrs. Albright, Patten, and Smith.

NOTE 17. INCOME TAXES

The effective income tax rate was 52.1% and 39.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The provision for income taxes reflects the Company’s estimate of the effective rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year, adjusted for any discrete events, which are reported in the period that they occur. During the first quarter of 2016, 68,000 shares of restricted Company common stock were permanently surrendered which constituted a discrete event in which the total related stock compensation expense charged to earnings under GAAP of approximately $2.3 million, of which approximately $1.6 million was recognized during the first quarter of 2016 and approximately $676,000 was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2015, became permanently non-deductible for tax purposes as the surrendered shares will not vest. Accordingly, no income tax benefit was recorded related to the approximately $2.3 million of stock compensation expense.

The Company files a consolidated income tax return in the United States Federal jurisdiction and the States of Arizona, Colorado, California, Florida, Illinois, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, Texas, and Washington. The Internal Revenue Service has audited the federal tax returns through the year 2012, with all proposed adjustments settled. The Company recognizes all potential accrued interest and penalties to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

34

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may be a party to certain legal proceedings, incidental to the normal course of its business. While the outcome of the legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

On November 21, 2011, the Company, Indigo Mallard Creek LLC and Indigo Development LLC, as owners of the property leased to Harris Teeter, Inc. (“Harris Teeter”) in Charlotte, North Carolina, were served with pleadings filed in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division for Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, for a highway condemnation action involving the property. The proposed road modifications would impact access to the Company’s property that is leased to Harris Teeter. The Company does not believe the road modifications provided a basis for Harris Teeter to terminate the Lease. Regardless, in January 2013, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (“NCDOT”) proposed to redesign the road modifications to keep the all access intersection open for ingress with no change to the planned limitation on egress to the right-in/right-out only. Additionally, NCDOT and the City of Charlotte proposed to build and maintain a new access road/point into the property. Construction has begun.  Harris Teeter has expressed satisfaction with the redesigned project and indicated that it will not attempt to terminate its lease if this project is built as currently redesigned. Because the redesigned project will not be completed until 2017, the condemnation case has been placed in administrative closure. As a result, the trial and mediation will not likely be scheduled until requested by the parties, most likely in 2017.

Contractual Commitments – Expenditures

In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 3.4 acres of land to RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. (“RaceTrac”) in December 2013, the Company agreed to reimburse RaceTrac for a portion of the costs for road improvements and the other costs associated with bringing multiple ingress/egress points to the entire approximately 23 acre Williamson Crossing site, including the Company’s remaining approximately 19.6 acres. The estimated cost for the improvements equals approximately $1.26 million and the Company’s commitment is to reimburse RaceTrac in an amount equal to the lesser of 77.5% of the actual costs or $976,500, and can be paid over five years from sales of the remaining land or at the end of the fifth year. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company deposited $283,500 of cash in escrow related to the improvements, which is classified as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets. The total amount in escrow as of June 30, 2016 was approximately $286,000, including accrued interest. Accordingly as of June 30, 2016, the remaining maximum commitment is approximately $691,000.

In connection with the acquisition of the Lowes on April 22, 2014, the Company was credited approximately $651,000 at closing for certain required tenant improvements, some of which are not required to be completed until December 2016. As of June 30, 2016, $100,000 of these tenant improvements had been completed and funded, leaving approximately $551,000 remaining to be funded as of June 30, 2016.

In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 98.69 acres within the Town Center, the Company is obligated to complete certain infrastructure improvements, including, but not limited to, the addition or expansion of roads and underlying utilities, and storm water retention (the “Infrastructure Work”). The Company entered into a construction agreement for approximately $9.1 million, including change orders through June 30, 2016, for the substantial portion of the Infrastructure Work. Approximately $7.0 million of the costs under this agreement have been incurred through June 30, 2016 and therefore, the remaining maximum commitment as of June 30, 2016 under this agreement is approximately $2.1 million. The anticipated completion for the Infrastructure Work is in or around October 2016.

In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 18.10 acres of land to an affiliate of Sam’s Club (“Sam’s”) in December 2015, the Company agreed to reimburse Sam’s for a portion of their construction costs applicable to adjacent outparcels retained by the Company. As a result, in December 2015, the Company deposited $125,000 of cash in escrow related to construction work which is classified as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets. The total amount in escrow as of June 30, 2016 was approximately $125,000, including accrued interest. Accordingly, the Company’s maximum commitment related to the construction work benefitting outparcels adjacent to Sam’s is approximately $125,000, to be paid from escrow upon completion.

35

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 14.98 acres of land to an affiliate of Integra Land Company (“Integra”) in December 2015, the Company agreed to reimburse Integra approximately $276,000 for a portion of the costs for road access and related utility improvements that will benefit the 14.98 acre land parcel sold to Integra as well as the surrounding acreage still owned by the Company. The Company also agreed to reimburse Integra approximately $94,000 for site relocation costs. Accordingly, in December 2015, the Company deposited a combined $370,000 of cash in escrow related to these reimbursements which are classified as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $277,000 was disbursed from the escrow account. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2016, the Company’s maximum remaining commitment related to these reimbursements is approximately $93,000 to be paid from escrow as costs are incurred.

Contractual Commitments – Land Pipeline

As of July 29, 2016, the Company had executed ten definitive purchase and sale agreements with eight different buyers whose intended use for the land under contract includes residential (including multi-family), retail and mixed-use retail, and office. These agreements, in aggregate, represent the potential sale of approximately 4,100 acres, or 39% of our land holdings, with anticipated sales proceeds totaling approximately $103 million, or an average of approximately $25,000 per acre. All of these agreements contemplate closing dates ranging from the third quarter of 2016 through 2018, and the Company expects some of the transactions to close in 2016, although the buyers are not contractually obligated to close until after 2016. Each of the transactions are in varying stages of due diligence by the various buyers including, in some instances, having made submissions to the planning and development departments of the City of Daytona Beach and other permitting activities with other applicable governmental authorities. In addition to other customary closing conditions, the majority of these transactions are conditioned upon the receipt of approvals or permits from those various governmental authorities, as well as other matters that are beyond our control. If such approvals are not obtained, the prospective buyers may have the ability to terminate their respective agreements prior to closing. As a result, there can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of any one of these potential land transactions being completed or the final terms thereof, including the sales price.

Minto Communities

One of the definitive purchase and sale agreements is with an affiliate of Minto Communities for Minto’s development of a 3,400-unit master planned age restricted residential community on an approximately 1,600-acre parcel of the Company’s land holdings west of Interstate 95. Minto received zoning and entitlement approvals from the City of Daytona Beach, Florida in April 2016 for the 3,400 residential units and approximately 215,000 square feet of commercial space. In addition, the contract with Minto currently contemplates the Company would provide seller financing for a portion of the sales price (the “Minto Note”). The Company anticipates utilizing the proceeds from the transaction in a 1031 like-kind exchange and therefore would be required to sell the Minto Note prior to the completion of the 1031 exchange which could be up to 180 days after the closing of the transaction with Minto. With the Company having resolved certain regulatory matters related to the Company’s prior agricultural activities on the land that includes the property under contract with Minto, and with Minto’s filing of its permit application with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “ACOE”), the Company now expects this transaction to close in late 2016 subject to Minto’s receipt of their permit from the ACOE.

Tomoka Town Center

The NADG First Parcel and Outparcel sales represent the first two of multiple transactions contemplated under the NADG Agreement. The NADG Agreement provides NADG with the ability to acquire the Remaining Option Parcels during the Option Period. The Remaining Option Parcels represent a total of approximately 81.55 acres and total potential proceeds to the Company of approximately $20.2 million, or approximately $248,000 per acre. Pursuant to the NADG Agreement, NADG can close on any or all of the Remaining Option Parcels at any time during the Option Period, should certain conditions be met. The NADG Agreement also establishes a price escalation percentage that would be applied to any of the Remaining Option Parcels that are acquired after January 2017, and an additional price escalation percentage that would be applied to any Remaining Option Parcels acquired in 2018.

Other Matters

In connection with a certain land sale contract to which the Company is a party, the purchaser’s pursuit of customary development entitlements gave rise to an inquiry by federal regulatory agencies regarding prior agricultural activities by the Company on such land. During the second quarter of 2015, we received a written information request regarding such activities. We submitted a written response to the information request along with supporting documentation. We believe the issues raised by, and the land which was the subject of, this inquiry are similar to or the same as those which were addressed and resolved by the settlement agreement executed in December 2012 between the Company and the St. Johns River Water Management District (the “District”) and the permit which the District subsequently issued to the Company. During the fourth quarter of 2015, based on discussions with the agency, a penalty related to this matter was deemed probable, and accordingly the estimated penalty of $187,500 has been accrued as of December 31, 2015, with no adjustment to that accrual being made during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Also during the fourth quarter of 2015, the agency advised the Company that the resolution to the inquiry would likely require the Company to incur costs associated

36

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

with wetlands restoration relating to approximately 148.35 acres of the Company’s land. At December 31, 2015, the Company’s third-party environmental engineers estimated the cost for such restoration activities to range from approximately $1.7 million to approximately $1.9 million. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2015, the Company accrued an obligation of approximately $1.7 million, representing the low end of the estimated range of possible restoration costs and included such estimated costs on the consolidated balance sheets as an increase in the basis of our land and development costs associated with those and benefitting surrounding acres. As of June 30, 2016 the final proposal from the Company’s third-party environmental engineer was received for a total cost of approximately $2.0 million. Accordingly, an increase in the accrual of approximately $300,000 was made during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Company funded approximately $590,000 of the total $2.0 million of estimated costs during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Company believes there is at least a reasonable possibility that the estimated remaining liability of approximately $1.4 million could change within one year of the date of the consolidated financial statements, which in turn could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and future cash flows. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis; however, actual results may differ from those estimates. Additionally, resolution of the regulatory matter required the Company to apply for an additional permit pertaining to an additional approximately 54.66 acres, which permit may require mitigation activities which the Company anticipates could be satisfied through the utilization of existing mitigation credits owned by the Company or the acquisition of mitigation credits. The Company anticipates that resolution of this matter will allow the Company to obtain certain permits from the applicable federal or state regulatory agencies needed in connection with the closing of the land sale contract that gave rise to this matter. The number of mitigation credits that may be required is not currently estimable and as the utilization or purchase of such credits would be incorporated into the basis of the land under contract, no amounts related to mitigation credits have been accrued as of June 30, 2016. In addition, in connection with other land sale contracts to which the Company is or may become a party, the pursuit of customary development entitlements by the potential purchasers may require the Company to utilize or acquire mitigation credits for the purpose of obtaining certain permits from the applicable federal or state regulatory agencies. Any costs incurred in connection with utilizing or acquiring such credits would be incorporated into the basis of the land under contract and, accordingly, no amounts related to such potential future costs have been accrued as of June 30, 2016.

During the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, the Company received communications from a single institutional shareholder, some of which have been filed publicly. In investigating the shareholder’s allegations, the Company has incurred costs of approximately $1.3 million, to date, through June 30, 2016 of which approximately $1.2 million was incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016, for legal representation, accounting services, additional director and committee meeting fees, or other third party costs. To date, none of the shareholder’s allegations have been found to have any basis or merit; however, such costs could continue to be incurred and, while not reasonably estimable, may represent significant costs for the Company which would have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

NOTE 19. BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA

The Company operates in four primary business segments: income properties, commercial loan investments, real estate operations, and golf operations. Our income property operations consist primarily of income-producing properties, and our business plan is focused on investing in additional income-producing properties. Our income property operations accounted for 66.8% and 68.6% of our identifiable assets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, and 39.9% and 56.3% of our consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016, we had three commercial loan investments including one fixed-rate and one variable-rate mezzanine loan and a variable-rate B-Note representing a secondary tranche in a commercial mortgage loan. Our real estate operations primarily consist of revenues generated from land transactions and leasing, royalty income, and revenue from the release of surface entry rights from our subsurface interests. Our golf operations consist of a single property located in the City, with two 18-hole championship golf courses, a practice facility, and clubhouse facilities, including a restaurant and bar operation, fitness facility, and pro-shop with retail merchandise. The majority of the revenues generated by our golf operations are derived from members and public customers playing golf, club memberships, and food and beverage operations.

37

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 19. BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA (continued)

The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes. The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products. They are managed separately because each segment requires different management techniques, knowledge, and skills.

Information about the Company’s operations in the different segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is as follows: 

 

Operating income represents income from continuing operations before loss on early extinguishment of debt, interest expense, investment income, and income taxes. General and corporate expenses are an aggregate of general and administrative expenses, impairment charges, depreciation and amortization expense, and gains (losses) on the disposition of assets. Identifiable assets by segment are those assets that are used in the Company’s operations in each segment. Other assets consist primarily of cash, property, plant, and equipment related to the other operations, as well as the general and corporate operations.

 

38

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 20. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, which amends its guidance on the recognition and reporting of revenue from contracts with customers. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to implement ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2019.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, related to simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendment requires entities to present debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability, whereas previously, debt issuance costs were presented as a deferred charge in the asset section of the balance sheet. The Company has adopted ASU 2015-03 effective January 1, 2016. The amount of unamortized debt issuance costs as of December 31, 2015 that were reclassified to be included as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability was approximately $1.7 million.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, relating to the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to implement ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which requires entities to recognize assets and liabilities that arise from financing and operating leases and to classify those finance and operating lease payments in the financing or operating sections, respectively, of the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which amends certain aspects of the stock-based compensation guidance. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to implement ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017.

 

NOTE 21. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITY

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company entered into a real estate venture with an unaffiliated third party institutional investor, whereby the venture acquired approximately six acres of vacant beachfront property located in Daytona Beach, Florida. The Company acquired its 50% interest in the real estate venture for approximately $5.7 million and serves as its general partner with day-to-day management responsibilities. The venture is structured such that the Company earns a base management fee and will receive a preferred interest as well as a promoted interest if certain return hurdles are achieved. The Company’s preferred interest represents the first 9% of the investment return achieved at the disposition of the property. GAAP requires consolidation of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) in which an enterprise has a controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary. Upon entering into the venture described above and as of June 30, 2016, the Company determined it has a controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary; therefore, the venture is a VIE and has been consolidated in the Company’s financial statements.

As of June 30, 2016, the VIE has one asset totaling $11,484,560 consisting of the six acre vacant beachfront property. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company contributed 50%, or $5,664,787, to the VIE for the initial property acquisition, with the other 50% contributed by the noncontrolling interest in the consolidated VIE. This consolidated venture has been accounted for in real estate operations with the inter-company management fees totaling approximately $12,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2016, eliminated upon consolidation.

 

NOTE 22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 5, 2016, the Company entered into a 15-year lease with a national fitness center for the anchor space at The Grove at Winter Park located in Winter Park, Florida. The lease is for approximately 40,000 square feet, or 36% of the approximately 112,000 square foot multi-tenant retail center. On July 6, 2016, the Company funded approximately $4.0 million into an escrow account for customary tenant improvements for the fitness center, which could open as early as the fourth quarter of 2016. The tenant will draw funding from escrow as construction progresses.

Under the $10 million stock repurchase program, subsequent to June 30, 2016 through July 28, 2016, the Company has repurchased 8,611 shares of its common stock on the open market for a total cost of approximately $417,000, or an average price per share of $48.48, and placed those shares in treasury.

39

---

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

NOTE 22. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)

On July 20, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the implementation of a quarterly dividend effective in the third quarter of 2016 in place of the present semi-annual dividend. The Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.04 for shareholders of record on August 10, 2016, to be paid on August 30, 2016, representing an annualized dividend of $0.16 per share, which would be a 100% increase over our present $0.08 per share annual dividend. The payment of the quarterly dividend is expected to impact the conversion rate applicable to the Notes pursuant to the terms and conditions thereof.  

40

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

When the Company uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, the Company is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, the Company’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those the Company anticipates or projects are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for year ended December 31, 2015. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or any document incorporated herein by reference. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or the aforementioned risk factors. The terms “us,” “we,” “our,” and “the Company” as used in this report refer to Consolidated-Tomoka Land Co. together with our consolidated subsidiaries.

OVERVIEW

We are a diversified real estate operating company. We own and manage thirty-seven commercial real estate properties in ten states in the U.S. As of June 30, 2016, we owned twenty-nine single-tenant and eight multi-tenant income-producing properties with over 1,500,000 square feet of gross leasable space. We also own and manage a land portfolio of approximately 10,500 acres. As of June 30, 2016, we had three commercial loan investments including one fixed-rate and one variable–rate mezzanine loan and a variable-rate B-Note representing a secondary tranche in a commercial mortgage loan. Our golf operations consist of the LPGA International golf club, which is managed by a third party. We also lease property for twenty billboards, have agricultural operations that are managed by a third party, which consists of leasing land for hay and sod production, timber harvesting, and hunting leases, and own and manage subsurface interests. The results of our agricultural and subsurface leasing operations are included in Agriculture and Other Income and Real Estate Operations, respectively, in our consolidated statements of operations.

Income Property Operations. We have pursued a strategy of investing in income-producing properties, when possible by utilizing the proceeds from real estate transactions qualifying for income tax deferral through like-kind exchange treatment for tax purposes.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company acquired one multi-tenant property, for an acquisition cost of approximately $2.5 million.

Our current portfolio of twenty-nine single-tenant income properties generates approximately $13.4 million of revenues from lease payments on an annualized basis and had an average remaining lease term of 9.5 years as of June 30, 2016. Our current portfolio of eight multi-tenant properties generates approximately $5.7 million of revenue from lease payments on an annualized basis and has a weighted average remaining lease term of 5.6 years as of June 30, 2016. We expect to continue to focus on acquiring additional income-producing properties during fiscal year 2016, and in the near term thereafter, maintaining our use of the aforementioned tax deferral structure whenever possible.

As part of our overall strategy for investing in income-producing investments, we have self-developed five of our multi-tenant properties which are located in Daytona Beach, Florida. The first self-developed property, located at the northeast corner of LPGA and Williamson Boulevards in Daytona Beach, Florida, is an approximately 22,000 square foot, two-story, building, known as the Concierge Office Building, which was 100% leased as of June 30, 2016. The second two properties, known as the Mason Commerce Center, consists of two buildings totaling approximately 31,000 square-feet (15,360 each), which was 100% leased as of June 30, 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2014, construction was completed on two additional properties, known as the Williamson Business Park, which are adjacent to the Mason Commerce Center. Williamson Business Park consists of two buildings totaling approximately 31,000 square-feet (15,360 each). One of the two buildings in the Williamson Business Park was sold on April 22, 2016 for a gain of approximately $822,000. The remaining Williamson Business Park building was approximately 50% leased as of June 30, 2016. Of the eight multi-tenant properties owned as of June 30, 2016, four were self-developed.

Our focus on acquiring income-producing investments includes a continual review of our existing income property portfolio to identify opportunities to recycle our capital through the sale of income properties based on, among other possible factors, the current or expected performance of the property and favorable market conditions. Pursuant to our on-going review, four properties were sold during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Another single-tenant property in Altamonte Springs, Florida leased to PNC Bank is under contract for sale as of June 30, 2016 (the “PNC Sale”), for which an impairment charge of approximately $942,000 was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2016. In addition, fourteen properties as described below are classified as held for sale. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the sale of its non-core income-producing properties to make future investments in income-producing assets, utilizing the tax-deferred like-kind exchange structure, as circumstances permit.

41

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

On March 28, 2016, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of a portfolio of fourteen single-tenant income properties (the “Portfolio Sale”). The properties include nine properties leased to Bank of America, located primarily in Orange County and also in Los Angeles County, California; two properties leased to Walgreens, located in Boulder, Colorado and Palm Bay, Florida; a property leased to a subsidiary of CVS located in Tallahassee, Florida; a ground lease for a property leased to Chase Bank located in Chicago, Illinois; and a ground lease for a property leased to Buffalo Wild Wings in Phoenix, Arizona. The sales price for the Portfolio Sale is approximately $51.6 million. The Portfolio Sale contemplates that the sales price includes the buyer’s assumption of the existing $23.1 million mortgage loan secured by the aforementioned properties. The Portfolio Sale, if completed, would result in an estimated gain of approximately $11.4 million, or approximately $1.22 per share, after tax. The Portfolio Sale is anticipated to close in the third quarter of 2016. The closing of the Portfolio Sale is subject to customary closing conditions

Real Estate Operations. As of June 30, 2016, the Company owned approximately 10,500 acres of land in Daytona Beach, Florida, along six miles of the west and east sides of Interstate 95. Presently, the majority of this land is used for agricultural purposes. Approximately 1,200 acres of our land holdings are located on the east side of Interstate 95 and are generally well suited for commercial development. Approximately 8,300 acres of our land holdings are located on the west side of Interstate 95 and the majority of this land is generally well suited for residential development. Included in the western land is approximately 1,000 acres which are located further west of Interstate 95 and a few miles north of Interstate 4 which is generally well suited for industrial purposes. Beginning in 2012, we have observed an increase in residential and commercial real estate activity in the area surrounding our land holdings.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company sold approximately 7.46 acres of land for approximately $2.2 million for total gains of approximately $1.4 million. In addition, gains totaling approximately $3.0 million and $8.8 million were recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, for the sales within the 235-acre Tomoka Town Center (the “Town Center”) which closed during the fourth quarter of 2015 and first quarter of 2016, for which revenue is being recognized on the percentage-of-completion basis as related infrastructure costs are incurred.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company sold approximately 3.9 acres. On June 1, 2015, the Company sold

approximately 3.0 acres of land located on the south side of LPGA Boulevard, just east of Clyde Morris Boulevard, at a sales price of $505,000, or approximately $167,000 per acre, for a gain of approximately $476,000. On June 17, 2015, the Company sold approximately 0.9 acres of land located in Highlands County, at a sales price of $250,000 for a gain of approximately $223,000.

Land Pipeline Update. As of July 29, 2016, the Company had executed ten definitive purchase and sale agreements with eight different buyers whose intended use for the land under contract includes residential (including multi-family), retail and mixed-use retail, and office. These agreements, in aggregate, represent the potential sale of approximately 4,100 acres, or 39% of our land holdings, with anticipated sales proceeds totaling approximately $103 million, or an average of approximately $25,000 per acre. All of these agreements contemplate closing dates ranging from the third quarter of 2016 through 2018, and the Company expects some of the transactions to close in 2016, although the buyers are not contractually obligated to close until after 2016. Each of the transactions are in varying stages of due diligence by the various buyers including, in some instances, having made submissions to the planning and development departments of the City of Daytona Beach and other permitting activities with other applicable governmental authorities. In addition to other customary closing conditions, the majority of these transactions are conditioned upon the receipt of approvals or permits from those various governmental authorities, as well as other matters that are beyond our control. If such approvals are not obtained, the prospective buyers may have the ability to terminate their respective agreements prior to closing. As a result, there can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of any one of these potential land transactions being completed or the final terms thereof, including the sales price.

Minto Communities

One of the definitive purchase and sale agreements is with an affiliate of Minto Communities for Minto’s development of a 3,400-unit master planned age restricted residential community on an approximately 1,600-acre parcel of the Company’s land holdings west of Interstate 95. Minto received zoning and entitlement approvals from the City of Daytona Beach, Florida in April 2016 for the 3,400 residential units and approximately 215,000 square feet of commercial space. In addition, the contract with Minto currently contemplates the Company would provide seller financing for a portion of the sales price (the “Minto Note”). The Company anticipates utilizing the proceeds from the transaction in a 1031 like-kind exchange and therefore would be required to sell the Minto Note prior to the completion of the 1031 exchange which could be up to 180 days after the closing of the transaction with Minto. With the Company having resolved certain regulatory matters related to the Company’s prior agricultural activities on the land that includes the property under contract with Minto, and with Minto’s filing of its permit application with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “ACOE”), the Company now expects this transaction to close in late 2016 subject to Minto’s receipt of their permit from the ACOE.

42

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Tomoka Town Center

The NADG First Parcel and Outparcel sales represent the first two of multiple transactions contemplated under a single purchase and sale agreement (the “NADG Agreement”) with an affiliate of North American Development Group (“NADG”). The NADG Agreement provides NADG with the ability to acquire portions of the remaining acreage under contract within the Town Center (the “Remaining Option Parcels”) in multiple, separate transactions through 2018 (the “Option Period”). The Remaining Option Parcels represent a total of approximately 81.55 acres and total potential proceeds to the Company of approximately $20.2 million, or approximately $248,000 per acre. Pursuant to the NADG Agreement, NADG can close on any and all of the Remaining Option Parcels at any time during the Option Period. The NADG Agreement also establishes a price escalation percentage that would be applied to any of the Remaining Option Parcels that are acquired after January 2017, and an additional price escalation percentage that would be applied to any Remaining Option Parcels acquired in 2018.

Variable Interest Entity. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company acquired, through a real estate venture with an unaffiliated third party institutional investor, an interest in approximately six acres of vacant beachfront property located in Daytona Beach, Florida for approximately $5.7 million. Upon entering into the venture described above and as of June 30, 2016, the Company determined it has a controlling financial interest and is the primary beneficiary; therefore, the venture is a VIE and has been consolidated in the Company’s financial statements.

Real Estate Impairments. During the three months ended June 30, 2016, impairment charges totaled approximately $1.0 million on our land holdings. Two of the ten aforementioned executed purchase and sale agreements, of which one was executed during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and the other was executed subsequent to June 30, 2016, include approximately 8 acres of land that have a higher cost basis than the remainder of the Company’s historic land holdings as these acres were repurchased by the Company in previous years from the prior purchasers thereof (the “Repurchased Land”). In connection with those two contracts, the Company recognized impairment charges of approximately $717,000 and $311,000, respectively, in the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The total impairment charges represent the anticipated losses on the sales plus estimated closing costs.

Subsurface Interests. The Company owns full or fractional subsurface oil, gas, and mineral interests underlying approximately 500,000 “surface” acres of land owned by others in 20 counties in Florida. The Company leases its interests to mineral exploration firms for exploration. Our subsurface operations consist of revenue from the leasing of exploration rights and in some instances additional revenues from royalties applicable to production from the leased acreage.

During November 2015, the Company hired Lantana Advisors, a subsidiary of SunTrust, to evaluate the possible sale of its subsurface interests. On April 13, 2016 the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Land Venture Partners, LLC for the sale of its 500,000 acres of subsurface interests, all located in the state of Florida, including the royalty interests in two operating oil wells in Lee County, Florida and its interests in the oil exploration lease with Kerogen Florida Energy Company LP, for a sales price of approximately $24 million (the “Subsurface Sale”). The purchase and sale agreement contemplates a closing of the Subsurface Sale prior to year-end 2016. The Subsurface Sale, if completed, would result in an estimated gain of approximately $22.6 million, or approximately $2.40 per share, after tax. The Company intends to use the proceeds from this sale as part of a Section 1031 like-kind exchange. The closing of the Subsurface Sale is subject to customary closing conditions. There can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of the Subsurface Sale being completed or the final terms thereof, including the sales price.

During 2011, an eight-year oil exploration lease was executed. The lease calls for annual lease payments which are recognized as revenue ratably over the respective twelve month lease periods. In addition, non-refundable drilling penalty payments are made as required by the drilling requirements in the lease which are recognized as revenue when received. Cash payments for both the annual lease payment and the drilling penalty, if applicable, are received in full on or before the first day of the respective lease year.

43

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Lease payments on the respective acreages and drilling penalties received through lease year five are as follows:

 

The terms of the lease state the Company will receive royalty payments if production occurs, and may receive additional annual rental payments if the lease is continued in years six through eight. The lease is effectively eight one-year terms as the lessee has the option to terminate the lease.

Lease income generated by the annual lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the guaranteed lease term. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, lease income of approximately $303,000 and $465,000, respectively, was recognized. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, lease income of approximately $606,000 and $925,000, respectively, was recognized. There can be no assurance that the oil exploration lease will be extended beyond the expiration of the current term of September 22, 2016 or, if renewed, on similar terms or conditions.

The Company also received oil royalties from operating oil wells on 800 acres under a separate lease with a separate operator. Revenues received from oil royalties totaled approximately $11,000 and $28,000, during the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Revenues from oil royalties totaled approximately $16,000 and $49,000, during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company may release surface entry rights or other rights upon request of a surface owner for a negotiated release fee based on a percentage of the surface value. Cash payments for the release of surface entry rights totaled approximately $450,000 and $2,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which is included in revenue from real estate operations. The May 2016 transaction for approximately $450,000 reflected gross proceeds net of fees, for the release of the Company’s surface entry rights related to approximately 960 acres of surface rights in Hendry County, Florida. The Company intends to utilize the proceeds from this transaction as part of a like-kind exchange transaction.

Golf Operations. Golf operations consist of the LPGA International golf club, a semi-private golf club consisting of two 18-hole championship golf courses, one designed by Rees Jones and the other designed by Arthur Hills, with a three-hole practice facility also designed by Rees Jones, a clubhouse facility, food and beverage operations, and a fitness facility located within the LPGA International mixed-use residential community on the west side of Interstate 95 in Daytona Beach, Florida. In 2012 and 2013, we completed approximately $534,000 of capital expenditures to renovate the clubhouse facilities, including a significant upgrade of the food and beverage operations, addition of fitness facilities, and renovations to public areas.

The Company entered into a management agreement with an affiliate of ClubCorp America (“ClubCorp”), effective January 25, 2012, to manage the LPGA International golf and clubhouse facilities. We believe ClubCorp, which owns and operates clubs and golf courses worldwide, brings substantial golf and club management expertise and knowledge to the LPGA International golf operations, including the utilization of national marketing capabilities, aggregated purchasing programs, and implementation of an affiliate member program, which has improved, and is expected to continue to improve, membership levels through the access to other member clubs in the affiliate program. Effective May 1, 2016, the Company and ClubCorp entered into the first amendment to extend the term of the management agreement from December 27, 2016 to September 30, 2022.

44

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

In July 2012, the Company entered into an agreement with the City of Daytona Beach, Florida (the “City”) to, among other things, amend the lease payments under its golf course lease (the “Lease Amendment”). Under the Lease Amendment, the base rent payment, which was scheduled to increase from $250,000 to $500,000 as of September 1, 2012, will remain at $250,000 for the remainder of the lease term and any extensions would be subject to an annual rate increase of 1.75% beginning September 1, 2013. The Company also agreed to invest $200,000 prior to September 1, 2015 for certain improvements to the facilities. In addition, pursuant to the Lease Amendment, beginning September 1, 2012, and continuing throughout the initial lease term and any extension option, the Company will pay additional rent to the City equal to 5.0% of gross revenues exceeding $5,500,000 and 7.0% of gross revenues exceeding $6,500,000. Since the inception of the lease, the Company has recognized the rent expense on a straight-line basis resulting in an estimated accrual for deferred rent. Upon the effective date of the Lease Amendment, the Company’s straight-line rent was revised to reflect the lower rent levels through expiration of the lease. As a result, approximately $3.0 million of the rent previously deferred will not be due to the City, and will be recognized into income over the remaining lease term, which expires in 2022. As of June 30, 2016, approximately $1.5 million of the rent, previously deferred that will not be due to the City, remained to be amortized through September 2022.

Commercial Loan Investments. Our investments in commercial loans or similar structured finance investments, such as mezzanine loans or other subordinated debt, have been and are expected to continue to be secured by commercial or residential real estate or land or the borrower’s pledge of its ownership interest in the entity that owns the real estate. The first mortgage loans we invest in or originate are for commercial real estate, located in the United States and its territories and are current or performing with either a fixed or floating rate. Some of these loans may be syndicated in either a pari-passu or senior/subordinated structure. Commercial first mortgage loans generally provide for a higher recovery rate due to their senior position in the underlying collateral. Commercial mezzanine loans are typically secured by a pledge of the borrower’s equity ownership in the underlying commercial real estate. Unlike a mortgage, a mezzanine loan is not secured by a lien on the property. An investor’s rights in a mezzanine loan are usually governed by an intercreditor agreement that provides holders with the rights to cure defaults and exercise control on certain decisions of any senior debt secured by the same commercial property.

On May 26, 2016, the Company’s $14.5 million first mortgage loan secured by the Sheraton Old San Juan Hotel located in San Juan, Puerto Rico was paid off at a discount of approximately $218,000. On payoff, the remaining loan origination fee net of loan costs was accreted into income.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the approximately $9.0 million B-Note secured by property in Sarasota, Florida and the $10.0 million mezzanine loan secured by property in Dallas, Texas were extended by the borrowers, each borrower having exercised one-year extension options thereby extending the maturity dates to June 2017 and September 2017, respectively.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company owned three performing commercial loan investments which have an aggregate outstanding principal balance of approximately $24.0 million. These loans are secured by real estate, or the borrower’s equity interest in real estate, located in Dallas, Texas, Sarasota, Florida, and Atlanta, Georgia and have an average remaining maturity of approximately 1.4 years and a weighted average interest rate of 8.7%.

Agriculture and Other Income. Effectively all of our agriculture and other income consists of revenues generated by our agricultural operations. The Company’s agricultural lands encompass approximately 9,300 acres on the west side of Daytona Beach, Florida. Our agricultural operations are managed by a third-party and consist of leasing land for hay production and timber harvesting, as well as hunting leases.

SUMMARY OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 COMPARED TO JUNE 30, 2015

Total revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 increased 69% to approximately $12.9 million, as compared to approximately $7.6 million during the same period in 2015. This increase was primarily the result of an increase of approximately $3.4 million from our real estate operations primarily related to approximately $3.8 million in revenue from the percentage-of-completion revenue recognition during the quarter for the Town Center land sales closed in the fourth quarter of 2015 and first quarter of 2016 noted above, which was an increase of approximately $3.1 million versus the land sales revenue recognized in the same period in 2015, and approximately $450,000 in revenue from the surface release transaction during the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The remaining increase in total revenue is primarily due to an increase of approximately $1.9 million, or 46%, in revenue generated by our income properties, reflecting our increased portfolio of properties including approximately $1.7 million of incremental rent revenue due to the addition of the 245 Riverside Avenue property, acquired in July 2015, and the Wells Fargo property, acquired in November 2015, offset by a reduction of approximately $425,000 in single-tenant rent revenue due to recent dispositions. Revenue from our income properties during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 also includes approximately $556,000 in revenue from the accretion of the below-market lease intangible, which is primarily attributable to the Wells Fargo property.

45

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $1.6 million, compared to approximately $225,000 in the same period in 2015. Net income per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was $0.28 per share, as compared to $0.04 per share during the same period in 2015, an increase of $0.24 per share, or 600%. Our results in the second quarter of 2016 benefited from approximately $3.0 million in gains from the aforementioned percentage-of-completion revenue recognition on the Town Center land sales. Our second quarter 2016 results also benefited from an increase of approximately $1.9 million in revenue from our income property portfolio as well as an increase of approximately $1.4 million related to the gains on the sales of three of the four income properties disposed of during the quarter. These increases were offset by increases in the direct costs of revenues of approximately $1.3 million, or 54%, the recognition of impairment charges of approximately $2.0 million during the quarter versus no impairment charges incurred in the same period in 2015, increased depreciation and amortization of approximately $734,000, or 69%, and increased interest expense of approximately $266,000, or 14%. Included in the net increase in direct cost of revenues of approximately $1.3 million was approximately $805,000 of direct costs of real estate operations primarily related to the recognition of cost basis for the aforementioned percentage-of-completion revenue recognition on the Town Center land sales and approximately $521,000 of increased direct costs of revenues for our income properties, which was primarily comprised of approximately $515,000 in increased operating expenses related to our acquisitions of the 245 Riverside Avenue property and the Wells Fargo property. In addition, our net income was impacted by increased depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $734,000, or 69%, resulting from our increased income property portfolio. The impairment charges totaling approximately $2.0 million include the impairment on the PNC Sale and the Repurchased Land.

INCOME PROPERTIES

Revenues and operating income from our income property operations totaled approximately $6.0 million and $4.8 million, respectively, during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, compared to total revenue and operating income of approximately $4.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2015. The direct costs of revenues for our income property operations totaled approximately $1.2 million and $683,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The approximately $1.9 million increase, or 46%, in revenues during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 reflects our expanded portfolio of income properties including approximately $1.7 million from our 245 Riverside and Wells Fargo acquisitions, partially offset by our recent income property dispositions of which all of the proceeds have not yet been re-invested into income-producing properties. Our increased operating income from our income property operations reflects increased rent revenues offset by an increase of approximately $521,000 in our direct costs of revenues which was primarily comprised of approximately $515,000 in increased operating expenses related to our recent investments including the 245 Riverside Avenue property and the Wells Fargo property.

REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS

During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, operating income from real estate operations was approximately $3.6 million on revenues totaling approximately $4.8 million. During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, operating income was approximately $1.1 million on revenues totaling approximately $1.4 million. The increase in revenue of approximately $3.4 million and operating income of approximately $2.6 million is primarily attributable to the revenue totaling approximately $3.8 million recognized for the sales within the Town Center which closed during the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, for which revenue is being recognized on the percentage-of-completion basis as related infrastructure costs are incurred, offset by approximately $755,000 in revenue from two land sales that closed during the second quarter of 2015. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2016, a surface entry release on approximately 960 acres generated approximately $450,000 in revenue. These increases were partially offset by the decrease in revenue generated from the eight-year oil exploration lease which totaled approximately $303,000 and $465,000 during the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of approximately $162,000. The increase in direct costs of real estate operations are a result of the cost basis related to the sales within the Town Center which closed during the fourth quarter of 2015 and first quarter of 2016 which, in the aggregate, totaled approximately $809,000.

GOLF OPERATIONS

Revenues from golf operations totaled approximately $1.4 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The total direct cost of golf operations revenues also totaled approximately $1.4 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The Company’s golf operations had net operating loss of approximately $35,000 and $8,000 during the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease in operating results of approximately $27,000. The primary reason for the decrease was a decline in golf revenue of approximately $65,000 which was partially offset by increased membership revenue of approximately $22,000.

46

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

INTEREST INCOME FROM COMMERCIAL LOAN INVESTMENTS

Interest income from our commercial loan investments totaled approximately $635,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 compared to approximately $639,000 in the same period in 2015. The interest income in the quarter ended June 30, 2016 reflected the interest earned from our portfolio of three remaining commercial loan investments of approximately $526,000 as well as approximately $109,000 from the loan secured by property in San Juan, Puerto Rico that was repaid during the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The interest income in the quarter ended June 30, 2015 reflected interest earned from our portfolio of three remaining commercial loan investments of approximately $509,000 as well as approximately $130,000 of revenue from two loans that were paid off during the second quarter of 2015.

AGRICULTURE AND OTHER INCOME

For the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, revenues from agriculture and other income, primarily our agriculture operations, totaled approximately $19,000 and $21,000, respectively. For the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the direct cost of revenues totaled approximately $53,000 and $43,000, respectively.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AND OTHER CORPORATE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses totaled approximately $1.9 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Although total general and administrative expenses remained consistent, non-cash stock compensation expense decreased by approximately $128,000 due to the full recognition of certain prior year grants of market-condition restricted stock. Legal fees increased by approximately $125,000 which is made up of approximately $200,000 in expense incurred for shareholder matters during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 offset by approximately $75,000 of expense incurred for environmental matters during the quarter ended June 30, 2015.

Four income properties were disposed of during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, of which three of the sales generated gains totaling approximately $1.4 million. The other sale during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was for a loss of approximately $210,000 which was recognized as an impairment charge during the quarter ended March 31, 2016. Also during the three months ended June 30, 2016, impairment charges totaling approximately $2.0 million included the impairment on the anticipated PNC Sale and the Repurchased Land. This represents an increase in impairment charges of approximately $2.0 million as there were no impairment charges during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense totaled approximately $2.2 million and $1.9 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increased interest expense during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same quarter in 2015, primarily reflects additional interest on the $25.0 million mortgage note payable secured by the Wells Fargo property in Raleigh issued in April 2016. Also, included in interest expense in the consolidated financial statements is the amortization of loan costs incurred in connection with the Company’s long-term debt and the amortization of the discount on the Notes (as hereinafter defined).

SUMMARY OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 COMPARED TO JUNE 30, 2015

Total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2016 increased 109% to approximately $31.2 million, as compared to approximately $14.9 million during the same period in 2015. This increase was primarily the result of an increase of approximately $12.1 million from our real estate operations primarily related to approximately $12.8 million in revenue from the percentage-of-completion revenue recognition during the six months ended June 30, 2016 on the Town Center land sales which was an increase of approximately $12.1 million versus the land sales revenue recognized in the same period in 2015, and approximately $450,000 in revenue from the surface release transaction during the six months ended June 30, 2016. The remaining increase in total revenue is primarily due to an increase of approximately $4.1 million, or 49%, in revenue generated by our income properties, reflecting our increased portfolio of properties including approximately $3.4 million of incremental rent revenue due to the addition of the 245 Riverside Avenue property and the Wells Fargo property, offset by a reduction of approximately $680,000 in single-tenant rent revenue due to recent dispositions. Revenue from our income properties during the six months ended June 30, 2016 also includes approximately $1.2 million in revenue from the accretion of the below-market lease intangible, which is primarily attributable to the Wells Fargo property.

47

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $3.0 million, compared to approximately $578,000 in the same period in 2015. Net income per share for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $0.52 per share, as compared to $0.10 per share during the same period in 2015, an increase of $0.42 per share, or 420%. Our results in the six months ended June 30, 2016 benefited from approximately $10.1 million in gains from the aforementioned percentage-of-completion revenue recognition. The six months ended June 30, 2016 also benefited from an increase of approximately $4.1 million in revenue from our income property portfolio as well as an increase of approximately $1.3 million related to the gains on the sales of three of the four income properties disposed of during the six months ended June 30, 2016. These increases were offset by increases in the direct costs of revenues of approximately $3.5 million, or 69%, increased general and administrative expenses of approximately $3.4 million, or 100%, increased impairment charges of approximately $1.7 million, or 328%, increased depreciation and amortization of approximately $1.6 million, or 74%, and increased interest expense of approximately $1.3 million, or 44%. Included in the net increase in direct cost of revenues of approximately $3.5 million was approximately $2.7 million of direct costs of real estate operations primarily related to the recognition of cost basis for the aforementioned percentage-of-completion revenue recognition on land transactions and approximately $1.1 million of increased direct costs of revenues for our income properties, which was primarily comprised of approximately $1.0 million in increased operating expenses related to our acquisitions of the 245 Riverside Avenue property and the Wells Fargo property. In addition, our net income was impacted by increased depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $1.6 million, or 74%, reflecting our increased income property portfolio. The increase in general and administrative expenses of approximately $3.4 million is primarily due to an increase in non-cash stock compensation expense of approximately $1.9 million, of which approximately $1.6 million is related to the acceleration of non-cash stock compensation expense in connection with the cancellation of certain grants in the first quarter of 2016, and increased legal costs of approximately $1.2 million, primarily related to certain shareholder matters. The impairment charges totaling approximately $2.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 included a charge of approximately $210,000 which was recognized on an income property in Sebring, Florida leased to a subsidiary of CVS which was sold in April 2016 and the impairment charges related to the PNC Sale and the Repurchased Land totaling approximately $2.0 million. The impairment charges totaling approximately $510,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were recognized as a result of two non-core income properties that were sold on April 17, 2015. The increased interest expense of approximately $1.3 million primarily reflects additional interest on the $25.0 million mortgage loan secured by our Wells Fargo property and our Notes, for which only a partial quarter of interest expense was incurred in the first quarter of 2015.

INCOME PROPERTIES

Revenues and operating income from our income property operations totaled approximately $12.5 million and $10.1 million, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to total revenue and operating income of approximately $8.4 million and $7.1 million, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The direct costs of revenues for our income property operations totaled approximately $2.4 million and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in revenues of approximately $4.1 million, or 49%, during the six months ended June 30, 2016 reflects our expanded portfolio of income properties including approximately $3.5 million from our 245 Riverside and Wells Fargo acquisitions, partially offset by our recent income property dispositions of which all of the proceeds have not yet been re-invested into more income-producing properties. Our increased operating income from our income property operations reflects increased rent revenues offset by an increase of approximately $1.1 million in our direct costs of revenues which was primarily comprised of approximately $1.0 million in increased operating expenses related to our recent investments including the 245 Riverside Avenue property and the Wells Fargo property.

REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, operating income from real estate operations was approximately $11.0 million on revenues totaling approximately $14.3 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2015, operating income was approximately $1.3 million on revenues totaling approximately $2.2 million. The increase in revenue of approximately $12.1 million and operating income of approximately $9.6 million is primarily attributable to the revenue totaling approximately $12.8 million recognized for the sales within the Town Center which closed during the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, for which revenue is being recognized on the percentage-of-completion basis as related infrastructure costs are incurred, offset by approximately $755,000 in revenue from two land sales that closed during the six months ended June 30, 2015. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2016 a surface entry release on approximately 960 acres generated approximately $450,000 in revenue. These increases were partially offset by the decrease in revenue generated from the eight-year oil exploration lease which totaled approximately $606,000 and $925,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease of approximately $319,000. The increase in direct costs of real estate operations are a result of the cost basis related to the sales within the Town Center which closed during the fourth quarter of 2015 and first quarter of 2016 which, in the aggregate, totaled approximately $2.7 million.

48

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

GOLF OPERATIONS

Revenues from golf operations totaled approximately $2.9 million and $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The total direct cost of golf operations revenues totaled approximately $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. The Company’s golf operations had net operating income of approximately $25,000 and $140,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a decrease in operating results of approximately $115,000. The primary reason for the decrease was a decline in golf revenue of approximately $163,000 which was partially offset by increased membership revenue of approximately $37,000.

INTEREST INCOME FROM COMMERCIAL LOAN INVESTMENTS

Interest income from our commercial loan investments totaled approximately $1.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to approximately $1.3 million in the same period in 2015. The interest income in the six months ended June 30, 2016 reflected the interest earned from our portfolio of three remaining commercial loan investments of approximately $1.1 million as well as approximately $466,000 from the loan secured by property in San Juan, Puerto Rico that was repaid during the six months ended June 30, 2016. The interest income during the six months ended June 30, 2015 reflected interest earned from our portfolio of three remaining commercial loan investments of approximately $1.0 million as well as approximately $259,000 of revenue from two loans that were paid off during the second quarter of 2015.

AGRICULTURE AND OTHER INCOME

For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, revenues from agriculture and other income, primarily our agriculture operations, totaled approximately $38,000 and $40,000, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the direct cost of revenues totaled approximately $101,000 and $98,000, respectively.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AND OTHER CORPORATE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses totaled approximately $6.7 million and $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase of approximately $3.4 million, or 100%, includes an increase in our non-cash stock compensation expense of approximately $1.9 million primarily due to the approximately $1.6 million of expense which was recognized during the first quarter of 2016 to accelerate the remaining expense of the total grant date fair value of the 68,000 shares of restricted Company common stock that were permanently surrendered in February 2016. See Note 16, “Stock-Based Compensation.” Additional increases were attributable to an increase in legal and related costs of approximately $1.3 million which was primarily comprised of approximately $1.2 million incurred in connection with investigating and responding to claims made by one of the Company’s shareholders. See Note 18, “Commitments and Contingencies.”

Four income properties were disposed of during the six months ended June 30, 2016, of which three of the sales generated gains totaling approximately $1.4 million. The other sale during the six months ended June 30, 2016 was for a loss of approximately $210,000 which was recognized as an impairment charge during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Also during the six months ended June 30, 2016, impairment charges totaled approximately $2.2 million, an increase of approximately $1.7 million from the same period of 2015. The $2.2 million of impairments charges during the six months ended June 30, 2016 included a charge of approximately $210,000 recognized in the first quarter of 2016 on an income property in Sebring, Florida leased to a subsidiary of CVS which was sold in April 2016 and impairment charges totaling approximately $2.0 million recognized in the second quarter of 2016 on the anticipated PNC Sale and the Repurchased Land. The impairment charge totaling approximately $510,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2015 was recognized as a result of two non-core income properties that were sold on April 17, 2015.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense totaled approximately $4.3 million and $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The approximately $1.3 million of increased interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, primarily reflects additional interest on the $25.0 million mortgage note payable secured by the Wells Fargo property in Raleigh issued in April 2016 and our Notes, for which only a partial quarter of interest expense was incurred in the first quarter of 2015. Also, included in interest expense in the consolidated financial statements is the amortization of loan costs incurred in connection with the Company’s long-term debt and the amortization of the discount on the Notes.

49

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and equivalents totaled approximately $24.7 million at June 30, 2016, excluding restricted cash. Restricted cash totaled $10.6 million at June 30, 2016 of which approximately $9.1 million is being held in escrow, from the sale of an income property and a surface entry right release, to be reinvested through the like-kind exchange structure into one or more additional income properties. Approximately $306,000 is being held in a reserve primarily for property taxes and insurance escrows in connection with our financing of two properties acquired in January 2013; approximately $504,000 is being held in three separate escrow accounts related to three separate land transactions of which one closed in December 2013 and two closed in December 2015; approximately $17,000 is being held by the consolidated variable interest entity in which the Company is the primary beneficiary; and approximately $634,000 is being held in a reserve primarily for certain required tenant improvements for the Lowes in Katy, Texas. Cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $4.1 million at December 31, 2015, excluding restricted cash.

Our total cash balance at June 30, 2016 reflects cash flows used in our operating activities totaling approximately $2.2 million during the six months then ended, compared to the prior year’s cash flows provided by operating activities in the same period totaling approximately $2.4 million. A portion of the $2.2 million used in our operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016 is related to the receipt of cash in the fourth quarter of 2015 for land sales in which the remaining revenue and gain is being recognized on the percentage-of-completion basis in 2016.

Our cash flows provided by investing activities totaled approximately $40.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, reflecting approximately $18.8 million in proceeds from the disposition of four non-core income properties, approximately $14.3 million received from the repayment of the commercial loan investment secured by real estate in San Juan, Puerto Rico, and proceeds of approximately $6.3 million received from the sales of investment securities, offset by an investment of approximately $2.5 million to acquire one multi-tenant income property. In addition, restricted cash decreased by approximately $3.5 million due to the timing of the completion of certain 1031 transactions.

Our cash flows used in financing activities totaled approximately $17.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily related to approximately $38.3 million in net pay downs on our revolving credit facility and stock repurchases during the six months ended June 30, 2016 which totaled approximately $3.0 million, offset by the approximately $25.0 million in proceeds received from the mortgage loan secured by the Wells Fargo property.

Our long-term debt balance, at face value, totaled approximately $160.4 million at June 30, 2016, representing a decrease of approximately $13.3 million from the face value balance of approximately $173.7 million at December 31, 2015. The decrease was due to the approximately $38.3 million in net pay downs on our revolving credit facility, offset by approximately $25.0 million in proceeds received from the mortgage loan secured by the Wells Fargo property.

Credit Facility. The Company has a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Bank of Montreal (“BMO”) as the administrative agent for the lenders thereunder. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The Credit Facility bank group is led by BMO and also includes Wells Fargo and Branch Banking & Trust Company. The Credit Facility matures on August 1, 2018 with the ability to extend the term for 1 year.

The Credit Facility has a total borrowing capacity of $75.0 million with the ability to increase that capacity up to $125.0 million during the term. The Credit Facility provides the lenders with a secured interest in the equity of the Company subsidiaries that own the properties included in the borrowing base. The indebtedness outstanding under the Credit Facility accrues interest at a rate ranging from the 30-day LIBOR plus 135 basis points to the 30-day LIBOR plus 225 basis points based on the total balance outstanding under the Credit Facility as a percentage of the total asset value of the Company, as defined in the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility also accrues a fee of 20 to 25 basis points for any unused portion of the borrowing capacity based on whether the unused portion is greater or less than 50% of the total borrowing capacity.

At June 30, 2016, the current commitment level under the Credit Facility was $75.0 million. The available borrowing capacity under the Credit Facility was approximately $42.3 million subject to the borrowing base requirements. As of May 13, 2016, the Credit Facility had a zero balance after the Company had paid off all outstanding draws.

On March 21, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment of the Credit Facility (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment modified certain terms of the Company’s Credit Facility effective as of September 30, 2015, including, among other things, (i) modifying certain non-cash or non-recurring items in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility, and eliminating stock repurchases from the calculation of fixed charges, both of which are part of the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio financial covenant, (ii) the addition of a measure for the fixed charge coverage ratio that must be met before the Company may repurchase shares of its own stock, and (iii) providing a consent of the lenders regarding the amount of the Company’s stock repurchases since the third quarter of 2015. 

50

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

On April 13, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment of the Credit Facility (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment modified section 8.8(n) of the Credit Facility which pertains to permitted stock repurchases by the Company, by, among other things, (i) adding the gains from the sale of unimproved land, including the sale of subsurface interests or the release of surface entry rights, net of taxes incurred in connection with the sale, to the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA, for the purpose of determining the coverage ratio that must be met before the Company may repurchase shares of its own stock, and (ii) reducing the coverage ratio that must be met before the Company may repurchase shares of its own stock pursuant to section 8.8(n) from 1.75x to 1.50x. As of the date of the Second Amendment, the Company meets the required coverage ratio; therefore, subject to black-out periods and other restrictions applicable to share repurchases, the Company will be able to continue to make additional repurchases of its own common stock under its existing $10 million repurchase program.

The Credit Facility is subject to customary restrictive covenants, including, but not limited to, limitations on the Company’s ability to: (a) incur indebtedness; (b) make certain investments; (c) incur certain liens; (d) engage in certain affiliate transactions; and (e) engage in certain major transactions such as mergers. In addition, the Company is subject to various financial maintenance covenants, including, but not limited to, a maximum indebtedness ratio, a maximum secured indebtedness ratio, and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The Credit Facility also contains affirmative covenants and events of default, including, but not limited to, a cross default to the Company’s other indebtedness and upon the occurrence of a change of control. The Company’s failure to comply with these covenants or the occurrence of an event of default could result in acceleration of the Company’s debt and other financial obligations under the Credit Facility.

The Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants as of December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants but for a default with respect to a covenant under the Credit Facility which requires the Company to maintain a borrowing base value of $75 million for income properties included in the borrowing base. Subsequent to our disposition of the income property leased to Lowe’s in Lexington, North Carolina in June 2016, the value of income properties on the borrowing base was approximately $71 million. The total value of the calculated borrowing base was also impacted by a provision of the Credit Facility which limits the value for a single income property to no more than 20% of the total borrowing base value. As a result, our $25.1 million investment in the 245 Riverside property in Jacksonville, Florida, which is included in the borrowing base, had a value of approximately $14 million in the borrowing base calculation. The Company obtained a waiver from the lending group effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which the Company adds one or more properties to the borrowing base sufficient to establish compliance with the covenant or (ii) December 31, 2016. As of May 13, 2016, the Credit Facility had a zero balance after the Company paid off all outstanding draws. If the Company fails to become compliant with the covenant by December 31, 2016, its liquidity could be adversely affected if another waiver from the lending group is not obtained or the lending group elects to terminate the Credit Facility. The Company expects to become compliant with the covenant through the acquisition of income-producing properties prior to December 31, 2016. As of July 29, 2016, the Company is under contract to acquire certain income-producing properties, some of which we expect to close before the end of the third quarter 2016. We expect the acquisition of these properties would result in the Company satisfying the borrowing base covenant; however, there can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of any one of these potential acquisition transactions being completed or the final terms thereof.

Mortgage Notes Payable. On February 22, 2013, the Company closed on a $7.3 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with UBS Real Estate Securities Inc., secured by its interest in the two-building office complex leased to Hilton Resorts Corporation, which was acquired on January 31, 2013. The mortgage loan matures in February 2018, carries a fixed rate of interest of 3.655% per annum, and requires payments of interest only prior to maturity.

On March 8, 2013, the Company closed on a $23.1 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with Bank of America, N.A., secured by its interest in fourteen income properties. The mortgage loan matures in April 2023, carries a fixed rate of 3.67% per annum, and requires payments of interest only prior to maturity.

On September 30, 2014, the Company closed on a $30.0 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with Wells Fargo, secured by its interest in six income properties. The mortgage loan matures in October 2034, and carries a fixed rate of 4.33% per annum during the first ten years of the term, and requires payments of interest only during the first ten years of the loan. After the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the loan, the cash flows generated by the underlying six income properties must be used to pay down the principal balance of the loan until paid off or until the loan matures. The loan is fully pre-payable after the tenth anniversary date of the effective date of the loan.

51

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

On April 15, 2016, the Company closed on a $25.0 million non-recourse first mortgage loan originated with Wells Fargo, secured by the Company’s income property leased to Wells Fargo located in Raleigh, North Carolina. The mortgage loan has a 5-year term with two years interest only, and interest and a 25-year amortization for the balance of the term. The mortgage loan, bears a variable rate of interest based on the 30-day LIBOR plus a rate of 190 basis points. The interest rate for this mortgage loan has been fixed through the use of an interest rate swap that fixed the rate at 3.17%. The mortgage loan can be prepaid at any time subject to the termination of the interest rate swap.

Convertible Debt. On March 11, 2015, the Company issued $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Notes”). The Notes bear interest at a rate of 4.50% per year, payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning on September 15, 2015. The Notes will mature on March 15, 2020, unless earlier purchased or converted. The initial conversion rate is 14.5136 shares of common stock for each $1,000 principal amount of Notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $68.90 per share of common stock.

The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Holders may not surrender their Notes for conversion prior to December 15, 2019 except upon the occurrence of certain conditions relating to the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock, the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, or specified corporate events. The Company may not redeem the Notes prior to the stated maturity date and no sinking fund is provided for the Notes. The Notes are convertible, at the election of the Company, into solely cash, solely shares of the Company’s common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company intends to settle the Notes in cash upon conversion with any excess conversion value to be settled in shares of our common stock. In accordance with GAAP, the Notes are accounted for as a liability with a separate equity component recorded for the conversion option. A liability was recorded for the Notes on the issuance date at fair value based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current market rates for debt instruments with similar terms. The difference between the initial proceeds from the Notes and the estimated fair value of the debt instruments resulted in a debt discount, with an offset recorded to additional paid-in capital representing the equity component. The discount on the Notes was approximately $6.1 million at issuance, which represents the cash discount paid of approximately $2.6 million and the approximate $3.5 million attributable to the value of the conversion option recorded in equity, which is being amortized into interest expense through the maturity date of the Notes. As of June 30, 2016 the unamortized debt discount of our Notes was approximately $4.7 million.

Net proceeds from issuance of the Notes was approximately $72.4 million (net of the cash discount paid of approximately $2.6 million) of which approximately $47.5 million was used to repay the outstanding balance of our Credit Facility as of March 11, 2015. We utilized the remaining amount for investments in income-producing properties or investments in commercial loans secured by commercial real estate.

Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchange. Our sources of liquidity includes the release of restricted cash from Section 1031 like-kind exchange transactions upon completion of the exchange. As of June 30, 2016, we had approximately $9.1 million of cash being held in escrow, from the sale of an income property and a surface entry release, to be reinvested through the like-kind exchange structure into one or more additional income properties. This restricted cash will become unrestricted upon the completion of the Section 1031 like-kind exchange related to the future acquisition of income-producing properties.

Acquisitions and Investments. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company acquired one multi-tenant income property, for an acquisition cost of approximately $2.5 million. During the remainder of 2016, we are targeting investments totaling between approximately $67.5 million and $82.5 million in income-producing properties. If certain land sale transactions were to close in 2016 and we complete the Portfolio Sale, our targeted investment amount for the remainder of 2016 would likely increase substantially. We expect to fund these acquisitions utilizing our cash on hand; the available capacity under the credit facility; cash from operations; proceeds from land sales transactions; the dispositions of income properties and potentially the sale of our subsurface interests, each of which we expect will qualify under the like-kind exchange deferred-tax structure; and may include additional funding sources. Subsequent to June 30, 2016, the Company is under contract to acquire certain income-producing properties; however, there can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of any one of these potential acquisition transactions being completed or the final terms thereof.

Dispositions. Four income properties were disposed of during the six months ended June 30, 2016, of which three were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2016. Proceeds from these sales totaled approximately $18.8 million. Additionally, fourteen single-tenant properties were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2016 and June 30, 2016 as previously described.

52

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Capital Expenditures. In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 3.4 acres of land to RaceTrac Petroleum, Inc. (“RaceTrac”) in December 2013, the Company agreed to reimburse RaceTrac for a portion of the costs for road improvements and the other costs associated with bringing multiple ingress/egress points to the entire approximately 23 acre Williamson Crossing site, including the Company’s remaining approximately 19.6 acres. The estimated cost for the improvements equals approximately $1.26 million and the Company’s commitment is to reimburse RaceTrac in an amount equal to the lesser of 77.5% of the actual costs or $976,500, and can be paid over five years from sales of the remaining land or at the end of the fifth year. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company deposited $283,500 of cash in escrow related to the improvements, which is classified as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets. The total amount in escrow as of June 30, 2016 was approximately $286,000, including accrued interest. Accordingly as of June 30, 2016, the remaining maximum commitment is approximately $691,000.

In connection with the acquisition of the Lowes on April 22, 2014, the Company was credited approximately $651,000 at closing for certain required tenant improvements, some of which are not required to be completed until December 2016. As of June 30, 2016, $100,000 of these tenant improvements had been completed and funded, leaving approximately $551,000 remaining to be funded as of June 30, 2016.

In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 98.69 acres within the Town Center, the Company is obligated to complete certain infrastructure improvements, including, but not limited to, the addition or expansion of roads and underlying utilities, and storm water retention (the “Infrastructure Work”). The Company entered into a construction agreement for approximately $9.1 million, including change orders through June 30, 2016, for the substantial portion of the Infrastructure Work. Approximately $7.0 million of the costs under this agreement have been incurred through June 30, 2016 and therefore, the remaining maximum commitment as of June 30, 2016 under this agreement is approximately $2.1 million. The anticipated completion for the Infrastructure Work is in or around October 2016.

In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 18.10 acres of land to an affiliate of Sam’s Club (“Sam’s”) in December 2015, the Company agreed to reimburse Sam’s for a portion of their construction costs applicable to adjacent outparcels retained by the Company. As a result, in December 2015, the Company deposited $125,000 of cash in escrow related to construction work which is classified as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets. The total amount in escrow as of June 30, 2016 was approximately $125,000, including accrued interest. Accordingly, the Company’s maximum commitment related to the construction work benefitting outparcels adjacent to Sam’s is approximately $125,000, to be paid from escrow upon completion.

In conjunction with the Company’s sale of approximately 14.98 acres of land to an affiliate of Integra Land Company (“Integra”) in December 2015, the Company agreed to reimburse Integra approximately $276,000 for a portion of the costs for road access and related utility improvements that will benefit the 14.98 acre land parcel sold to Integra as well as the surrounding acreage still owned by the Company. The Company also agreed to reimburse Integra approximately $94,000 for site relocation costs. Accordingly, in December 2015, the Company deposited a combined $370,000 of cash in escrow related to these reimbursements which are classified as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheets. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, approximately $277,000 was disbursed from the escrow account. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2016, the Company’s maximum remaining commitment related to these reimbursements is approximately $93,000 to be paid from escrow as costs are incurred.

On April 5, 2016, the Company entered into a 15-year lease with a national fitness center for the anchor space at The Grove at Winter Park located in Winter Park, Florida. The lease is for approximately 40,000 square feet, or 36% of the approximately 112,000 square foot multi-tenant retail center. On July 6, 2016, the Company funded approximately $4.0 million into an escrow account for customary tenant improvements for the fitness center, which could open as early as the fourth quarter of 2016. The tenant will draw funding from escrow as construction progresses.

As of June 30, 2016, we have no other contractual requirements to make capital expenditures.

In connection with a certain land sale contract to which the Company is a party, the purchaser’s pursuit of customary development entitlements gave rise to an inquiry by federal regulatory agencies regarding prior agricultural activities by the Company on such land. During the second quarter of 2015, we received a written information request regarding such activities. We submitted a written response to the information request along with supporting documentation. We believe the issues raised by, and the land which was the subject of, this inquiry are similar to or the same as those which were addressed and resolved by the settlement agreement executed in December 2012 between the Company and the St. Johns River Water Management District (the “District”) and the permit which the District subsequently issued to the Company. During the fourth quarter of 2015, based on discussions with the agency, a penalty related to this matter was deemed probable, and accordingly the estimated penalty of $187,500 has been accrued as of December 31, 2015, with no adjustment to that accrual being made during the six months ended June 30, 2016. Also during the fourth quarter of

53

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

2015, the agency advised the Company that the resolution to the inquiry would likely require the Company to incur costs associated with wetlands restoration relating to approximately 148.35 acres of the Company’s land. At December 31, 2015, the Company’s third-party environmental engineers estimated the cost for such restoration activities to range from approximately $1.7 million to approximately $1.9 million. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2015, the Company accrued an obligation of approximately $1.7 million, representing the low end of the estimated range of possible restoration costs and included such estimated costs on the consolidated balance sheets as an increase in the basis of our land and development costs associated with those and benefitting surrounding acres. As of June 30, 2016 the final proposal from the Company’s third-party environmental engineer was received for a total cost of approximately $2.0 million. Accordingly, an increase in the accrual of approximately $300,000 was made during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Company funded approximately $590,000 of the total $2.0 million of estimated costs during the three months ended June 30, 2016. The Company believes there is at least a reasonable possibility that the estimated remaining liability of approximately $1.4 million could change within one year of the date of the consolidated financial statements, which in turn could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets and future cash flows. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis; however, actual results may differ from those estimates. Additionally, resolution of the regulatory matter required the Company to apply for an additional permit pertaining to an additional approximately 54.66 acres, which permit may require mitigation activities which the Company anticipates could be satisfied through the utilization of existing mitigation credits owned by the Company or the acquisition of mitigation credits. The Company anticipates that resolution of this matter will allow the Company to obtain certain permits from the applicable federal or state regulatory agencies needed in connection with the closing of the land sale contract that gave rise to this matter. The number of mitigation credits that may be required is not currently estimable and as the utilization or purchase of such credits would be incorporated into the basis of the land under contract, no amounts related to mitigation credits have been accrued as of June 30, 2016. In addition, in connection with other land sale contracts to which the Company is or may become a party, the pursuit of customary development entitlements by the potential purchasers may require the Company to utilize or acquire mitigation credits for the purpose of obtaining certain permits from the applicable federal or state regulatory agencies. Any costs incurred in connection with utilizing or acquiring such credits would be incorporated into the basis of the land under contract and, accordingly, no amounts related to such potential future costs have been accrued as of June 30, 2016.

During the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, the Company received communications from a single institutional shareholder, some of which have been filed publicly. In investigating the shareholder’s allegations, the Company has incurred costs of approximately $1.3 million, to date, through June 30, 2016 of which approximately $1.2 million was incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2016, for legal representation, accounting services, additional director and committee meeting fees, or other third party costs. To date, none of the shareholder’s allegations have been found to have any basis or merit; however, such costs could continue to be incurred and, while not reasonably estimable, may represent significant costs for the Company which would have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.

We believe we will have sufficient liquidity to fund our operations, capital requirements, and debt service requirements over the next twelve months and into the foreseeable future, with our cash on hand, cash flow from our operations, cash from the completion of 1031 like-kind exchanges, and the available borrowing capacity of approximately $42.3 million under the Credit Facility, based on the borrowing base requirements, as of June 30, 2016.

During November 2015, the Company hired Lantana Advisors, a subsidiary of SunTrust, to evaluate the possible sale of its subsurface interests. On April 13, 2016 the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Land Venture Partners, LLC for the sale of its 500,000 acres of subsurface interests, all located in the state of Florida, including the royalty interests in two operating oil wells in Lee County, Florida and its interests in the oil exploration lease with Kerogen Florida Energy Company LP, for a sales price of approximately $24 million (the “Subsurface Sale”). The purchase and sale agreement contemplates a closing of the Subsurface Sale prior to year-end 2016. The Subsurface Sale, if completed, would result in an estimated gain of approximately $22.6 million, or approximately $2.40 per share, after tax. The Company intends to use the proceeds from this sale as part of a Section 1031 like-kind exchange. The closing of the Subsurface Sale is subject to customary closing conditions. There can be no assurances regarding the likelihood or timing of the Subsurface Sale being completed or the final terms thereof, including the sales price.

In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company announced a new $10 million stock repurchase program. Under the new $10 million stock repurchase program, during the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 62,751 shares of its common stock on the open market for a total cost of approximately $3.0 million, or an average price per share of $47.78, and placed those shares in treasury. In July 2016, the Company announced its intent to complete, by the end of 2016, the remaining approximately $7.0 million of the $10 million stock repurchase program, depending upon market conditions.

54

---

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Our Board of Directors and management consistently review the allocation of capital with the goal of providing the best long-term return for our shareholders. These reviews consider various alternatives, including increasing or decreasing regular dividends, repurchasing stock, and retaining funds for reinvestment.

On July 20, 2016, the Company announced the conclusion to the evaluation of strategic alternatives for the Company to enhance shareholder value (the “Strategic Review”), which included the consideration of a wide range of potential alternatives, including sale of the Company, the sale of all or a portion of certain of the Company’s asset portfolios, and other actions including the continuation of the Company’s business plan. While the comprehensive Strategic Review process has concluded, the Company and its Board of Directors intend to continue discussions with some interested parties who have indicated interest in certain of the Company’s assets. However, there is no set time line or formal process to these continued discussions and there can be no assurances that our efforts will lead to a transaction or the timing or terms thereof. The Board of Directors remains committed to maximizing long-term value for all of its shareholders.

Otherwise, at least annually, the Board of Directors reviews our business plan and corporate strategies and makes adjustments as circumstances warrant.

Management’s focus is to continue to execute on our strategy, which is to diversify our portfolio by redeploying proceeds from like-kind exchange transactions utilizing leverage including the borrowing capacity available under our Credit Facility and possibly the disposition or payoffs on our commercial loan investments to increase our portfolio of income-producing properties, to provide stabilized cash flows with good risk adjusted returns primarily in larger metropolitan areas.

We believe that we currently have a reasonable level of leverage. Proceeds from closed land transactions provide us with investible capital. Our strategy is to utilize leverage, when appropriate and necessary, and proceeds from land transactions, sales of income properties, and certain transactions in our subsurface interests, to acquire income properties. We may also acquire or originate commercial loan investments, invest in securities of real estate companies, or make other shorter term investments. Our targeted investment classes may include the following:

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2015. Judgments and estimates of uncertainties are required in applying our accounting policies in many areas. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, there have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies affecting the application of those accounting policies as noted in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

55

---

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

The principal market risk (i.e. the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices), to which we are exposed is interest rate risk, relating to our debt. We may utilize overnight sweep accounts and short-term investments as a means to minimize the interest rate risk. We do not believe that interest rate risk related to cash equivalents and short-term investments, if any, is material due to the nature of the investments.

We are primarily exposed to interest rate risk relating to our own debt in connection with our credit facility, as this facility carries a variable rate of interest. Our borrowings on our $75.0 million revolving credit facility bear a variable rate of interest based on the 30-day LIBOR plus a rate of between 135 basis points and 225 basis points based on our level of borrowing as a percentage of our total asset value. There was no outstanding balance on our credit facility at June 30, 2016. The $25.0 million mortgage loan which closed on April 15, 2016, bears a variable rate of interest based on the 30-day LIBOR plus a rate of 190 basis points. The interest rate for this mortgage loan has been fixed through the use of an interest rate swap that fixed the rate at 3.17%. Management’s objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to manage our overall borrowing costs.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation, as required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2016, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the six months ended June 30, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company may be a party to certain legal proceedings, incidental to the normal course of its business. While the outcome of the legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

On November 21, 2011, the Company, Indigo Mallard Creek LLC and Indigo Development LLC, as owners of the property leased to Harris Teeter, Inc. (“Harris Teeter”) in Charlotte, North Carolina, were served with pleadings filed in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division for Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, for a highway condemnation action involving the property. The proposed road modifications would impact access to the Company’s property that is leased to Harris Teeter. The Company does not believe the road modifications provided a basis for Harris Teeter to terminate the Lease. Regardless, in January 2013, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (“NCDOT”) proposed to redesign the road modifications to keep the all access intersection open for ingress with no change to the planned limitation on egress to the right-in/right-out only. Additionally, NCDOT and the City of Charlotte proposed to build and maintain a new access road/point into the property. Construction has begun.  Harris Teeter has expressed satisfaction with the redesigned project and indicated that it will not attempt to terminate its lease if this project is built as currently redesigned. Because the redesigned project will not be completed until 2017, the condemnation case has been placed in administrative closure. As a result, the trial and mediation will not likely be scheduled until requested by the parties, most likely in 2017.

56

---

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Certain statements contained in this report (other than statements of historical fact) are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “will,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “forecast,” “project,” and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. Forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effect upon the Company.

There can be no assurance that future developments will be in accordance with management’s expectations or that the effect of future developments on the Company will be those anticipated by management.

We wish to caution readers that the assumptions, which form the basis for forward-looking statements with respect to or that may impact earnings for the year-ended December 31, 2016, and thereafter, include many factors that are beyond the Company’s ability to control or estimate precisely. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the strength of the real estate market in the City and Volusia County, Florida; the impact of a prolonged recession or downturn in economic conditions; our ability to successfully execute acquisition or development strategies; any loss of key management personnel; changes in local, regional, and national economic conditions affecting the real estate development business and income properties; the impact of environmental and land use regulations generally and on certain land sale transactions specifically; extreme or severe weather conditions; the impact of competitive real estate activity; variability in quarterly results due to the unpredictable timing of land transactions; the loss of any major income property tenants; the timing of land sale transactions; and the availability of capital. These risks and uncertainties may cause our actual future results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There have been no material changes to those risk factors. The risks described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that the Company currently deems to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company.

While we periodically reassess material trends and uncertainties affecting our results of operations and financial condition, we do not intend to review or revise any particular forward-looking statement referenced herein in light of future events.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2016, which were not previously reported.

The following share repurchases were made during the six months ended June 30, 2016:

 

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable

57

---

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits:

 

 

 

58

---

 

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

 

59