def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlueLinx
Holdings Inc.
4300 Wildwood Parkway
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
April 16, 2010
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. The meeting will be held
at our headquarters at 4300 Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia
30339 on Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. Eastern
Daylight Saving Time. The matters to be voted upon at the
meeting are listed in the accompanying notice of the Annual
Meeting, and are described in more detail in the accompanying
proxy statement and proxy card. Whether or not you plan to
attend the Annual Meeting, please complete, date, sign and mail
promptly the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided to
ensure that your vote will be counted. If you attend the
meeting, you will, of course, have the right to revoke the proxy
and vote your shares in person.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, management and employees of
BlueLinx, I extend our appreciation for your continued support
and look forward to meeting with you.
Very truly yours,
George R. Judd
President and Chief Executive Officer
BLUELINX
HOLDINGS INC.
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Our Stockholders:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. will be held at our
headquarters at 4300 Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339 on
Thursday, May 20, 2010, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight
Saving Time, for the following purposes:
1. to elect ten directors to hold office until the 2011
annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are
duly elected and qualified;
2. to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP
as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal
year 2010; and
3. to transact such other business as may properly come before
the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 2,
2010, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting
or any postponements or adjournments of the meeting.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends voting FOR
the above proposals.
Whether or not you expect to be present in person at the
meeting, please sign and date the accompanying proxy and return
it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid reply envelope. This
will assist us in preparing for the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Matthew R. Nozemack,
Secretary
April 16, 2010
Atlanta, Georgia
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING AVAILABILITY
OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, MAY 20, 2010
BlueLinx Holdings Inc. is providing access to its proxy
materials both by sending you this full set of proxy materials
and by notifying you of the availability of its proxy materials
on the Internet.
You may access the following proxy materials as of the date
they are first mailed to our stockholders by visiting our
website, www.bluelinxco.com, and clicking on the Investor
Relations tab.
|
|
|
|
|
Notice of 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
Thursday, May 20, 2010;
|
|
|
|
Proxy Statement for 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be
held on Thursday, May 20, 2010;
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010.
|
These proxy materials are available free of charge and will
remain available through the conclusion of the Annual Meeting.
In accordance with SEC rules, the proxy materials on the site
are searchable, readable and printable and the site does not
have cookies or other tracking devices which
identify visitors.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
The enclosed proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors
of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. (BlueLinx, us,
we, our, or the Company) for
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or any postponement or
adjournment of the meeting, for the purposes set forth in the
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
Copies of this proxy statement, the form of proxy and the annual
report will be mailed to stockholders on or about April 16,
2010. The proxy statement and annual report are also available
on the investor relations page of our website at
www.bluelinxco.com.
Attending
the Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting will be held at our headquarters at 4300
Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339 on Thursday,
May 20, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Saving
Time. For directions to the meeting please contact our investor
relations department at
770-953-7000.
Holders of our common stock as of the close of business on
April 2, 2010 will be entitled to attend and vote at the
meeting.
i
BLUELINX
HOLDINGS INC.
4300 Wildwood Parkway
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
770-953-7000
GENERAL
INFORMATION
Why did I
receive this proxy statement?
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies on behalf of our Board of Directors (the
Board) to be voted at the annual meeting of our
stockholders to be held on May 20, 2010, and any
adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in the
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. The meeting will be held at our
headquarters, 4300 Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, on
Thursday, May 20, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight
Saving Time. This proxy statement and accompanying proxy card
are being first sent or given to our stockholders on or about
April 16, 2010. Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 2, 2010, accompanies this proxy
statement.
Who is
soliciting my vote?
Our Board is soliciting your vote at the 2010 Annual Meeting of
BlueLinx Stockholders.
Who is
entitled to vote?
Only our stockholders of record at the close of business on
April 2, 2010, the Record Date, are entitled to
receive notice of the meeting, attend the meeting and to vote
the shares of our common stock that they held on that date at
the meeting, or any adjournment thereof. Each outstanding share
that you own as of the Record Date entitles you to cast one vote
on each matter to be voted upon.
Who can
attend the meeting?
All stockholders of record as of the close of business on the
Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the
meeting. Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture
identification, such as a drivers license or passport.
Please note that if you hold your shares in street
name (that is, through a broker or other nominee), you
will need to bring a copy of a brokerage statement reflecting
your stock ownership as of the Record Date. If you are a
stockholder of record, your name will appear on our stockholder
list.
What will
I vote on?
Two items:
|
|
|
|
|
the election of ten directors to our Board; and
|
|
|
|
the ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2010.
|
Will
there be any other items of business on the agenda?
We do not expect any other items of business at the meeting.
Nonetheless, if there is an unforeseen matter raised, your proxy
will give discretionary authority to the persons named on the
proxy to vote on any other matters that may be brought before
the meeting. These persons will use their best judgment in
voting your proxy.
How many
votes must be present to conduct business at the
meeting?
The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the
holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock
outstanding on the Record Date will constitute a quorum,
permitting business to be conducted at the meeting. As of the
Record Date, we had 32,676,562 shares of common stock
outstanding. Proxies received but marked as abstentions or
broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the
number of shares considered to be present at the meeting. A
broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a
beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because
the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with
respect to that item and has not received instructions from the
beneficial owner.
How do I
vote?
If you complete and properly sign the accompanying proxy card
and return it to us, it will be voted as you direct. If you are
a registered stockholder and attend the meeting, you may deliver
your completed proxy card in person. Street name
stockholders who wish to vote at the meeting will need to obtain
a proxy form from the institution that holds their shares.
1
Under recent amendments to the rules of the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE), the election of directors is no
longer a routine matter as to which brokerage firms
may vote in their discretion on behalf of clients who have not
furnished voting instructions (the ratification of
Ernst &Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm is considered a routine matter). Therefore,
unlike prior Annual Meetings, unless you provide your broker
with instructions, your shares will not be voted in connection
with the election of the directors to our Board.
Can I
change my vote after I return my proxy card?
Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change
your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised by filing
either a notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a
later date with our secretary, at our principal executive
offices, BlueLinx Holdings Inc., attn: Corporate Secretary, 4300
Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339. The powers of the
proxy holder(s) will be suspended if you attend the meeting in
person and so request, although attendance at the meeting will
not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy.
What are
the recommendations of our Board of Directors?
Our Board recommends a vote FOR the election of the
nominated slate of directors and FOR the ratification of
the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year
2010.
What vote
is required to approve each item?
|
|
|
|
|
Election of Directors. A nominee will be
elected as a director if he receives a plurality of the votes
cast at the meeting. Plurality means that the
nominees receiving the largest number of votes cast are elected
as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen
at the meeting. In other words, the ten director nominees
receiving the most votes will be elected. Broker non-votes and
marking your proxy card to withhold authority for all or some
nominees will not be counted either for or against a director
nominee.
|
|
|
|
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the votes cast is required to ratify the appointment
of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal year 2010. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will not be counted either for or against this
proposal.
|
Are
abstentions and broker non-votes part of the quorum?
Abstentions and broker non-votes count as shares
present at the meeting for purposes of determining whether
a quorum is present.
What if I
dont vote for some or all of the matters listed on my
proxy card?
If you are a registered stockholder and you return a signed
proxy card without indicating your vote for some or all of the
matters, your shares will be voted as follows for any matter you
did not indicate a vote on:
|
|
|
|
|
FOR the director nominees to the Board listed on the
proxy card; and
|
|
|
|
FOR the ratification of the appointment of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal year 2010.
|
How will
proxies be solicited?
Proxies will be solicited by mail. Proxies may also be solicited
by our officers and regular employees personally or by telephone
or facsimile, but such persons will not be specifically
compensated for such services. Banks, brokers, nominees and
other custodians and fiduciaries will be reimbursed for their
reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses in forwarding soliciting material to their principals,
the beneficial owners of our common stock. We will pay the
expense of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and
soliciting proxies.
Is there
electronic access to the proxy materials and annual
report?
Yes. This proxy statement and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are available on our website at www.bluelinxco.com.
Who are
our largest stockholders?
As of the Record Date, Cerberus ABP Investor LLC, an affiliate
of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., or Cerberus, owned
18,100,000 shares of our common stock, representing
approximately 55% of the then outstanding shares of common stock
of BlueLinx.
2
ITEMS OF
BUSINESS TO BE ACTED ON AT THE MEETING
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Our Board currently consists of ten members. Each of our current
directors has been nominated for reelection and has consented to
stand for reelection.
The terms of all of the members of our Board will expire at the
next annual meeting after their election, or until their
successors, if any, are elected and appointed. If you do not
wish your shares of common stock to be voted for particular
nominees, you may so indicate on the enclosed proxy card. If,
for any reason, any of the nominees become unavailable for
election, the individuals named in the enclosed proxy card may
exercise their discretion to vote for any substitutes proposed
by the Board. At this time, the Board knows of no reason why any
nominee might be unavailable to serve.
Our Board
unanimously recommends a vote FOR each of the following
nominees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard S. Cohen
|
|
Charles H. McElrea
|
|
|
|
Richard S. Grant
|
|
Alan H. Schumacher
|
|
|
|
George R. Judd
|
|
Mark A. Suwyn
|
|
|
|
Richard B. Marchese
|
|
Robert G. Warden
|
|
|
|
Steven F. Mayer
|
|
M. Richard Warner
|
Biographical and other information about these nominees can be
found under Identification of Executive Officers and
Directors elsewhere in this proxy statement.
PROPOSAL 2:
RATIFICATION
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has selected
Ernst & Young LLP to serve as our independent
registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2010.
Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent
registered public accounting firm since our inception. While
stockholder ratification of the selection of Ernst &
Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm
is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, our Board is
submitting the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to our
stockholders for ratification. If our stockholders fail to
ratify the selection, the Audit Committee may, but is not
required to, reconsider whether to retain that firm. Even if the
selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion,
may direct the appointment of a different independent auditing
firm at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that
such a change would be in our best interests and that of our
stockholders.
Ernst & Young LLP has advised us that it has no
direct, nor any material indirect, financial interest in us or
any of our subsidiaries. We expect that representatives of
Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the meeting to
make any statement they may desire and to respond to appropriate
questions from our stockholders.
3
Fees Paid
To Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table presents the aggregate fees billed by
Ernst & Young LLP for professional services for fiscal
years 2009 and 2008, by category as described in the notes to
the table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$
|
1,659,756
|
|
|
$
|
1,560,000
|
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
145,000
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees(3)
|
|
|
23,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
1,853,531
|
|
|
$
|
1,705,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of fees related to audits of our consolidated financial
statements, and reviews of interim financial statements and
disclosures in filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Audit fees also included fees
related to the audit of internal control over financial
reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists of fees billed for services related to benefit plan
audits. |
|
(3) |
|
Consists of fees billed for services related to certain
transactional services. |
Pre-Approval
of Audit and Non-Audit Services
The charter of the Audit Committee provides that the Committee
is responsible for the pre-approval of all material audit
services and non-audit services to be performed for us by our
independent registered public accounting firm. All audit and
non-audit work described above was pre-approved by the Audit
Committee. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of
its members the authority to grant such pre-approvals. The
decisions of any such member shall be presented to the full
Audit Committee at each of its scheduled meetings.
Our Board
unanimously recommends a vote FOR the ratification of
Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for fiscal year 2010.
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board met seven times during 2009. Each incumbent director
attended at least 75% of the total of all Board and committee
meetings he was entitled to attend during 2009.
Our Board has reviewed the independence of each of its members
based on the criteria for independence set forth under
applicable securities laws, including the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and applicable rules
and regulations of the NYSE. The NYSE Listed Company Manual and
corresponding listing standards provide that, in order to be
independent, the Board must determine that a director has no
material relationship with the Company other than as a director.
The Board has reviewed the relationships between each Board
member and the Company. Based on its review, the Board has
affirmatively determined, by resolution of the Board as a whole,
that the following directors have no material relationship with
us or any other matter of any kind that would impair their
independence for purposes of serving on our Board and,
therefore, satisfy the requirements to be considered independent
under the NYSE listing standards applicable to the Board as well
as satisfying the independence requirements applicable to audit
committee membership: Richard S. Grant, Richard B. Marchese and
Alan H. Schumacher. Mr. Marcheses service on the
audit committees of three other public companies has been
determined by the Board not to impair his ability to serve on
the Companys Audit Committee.
As further described under Controlled Company,
below, because we are a controlled company, we are
exempt from the requirement that our Board be comprised of a
majority of independent directors. Five members of our current
Board are current or former employees of, or advisors to,
Cerberus, the indirect holder of a majority of the outstanding
shares of our common stock, and as such are not independent.
4
Our business and affairs are managed by our Board. To assist it
in carrying out its responsibilities, our Board has established
the two standing committees described below, under
Committees of the Board of Directors. The charter
for each of these committees, as in effect from time to time,
may be found on our website, www.bluelinxco.com. Each of
these committees has the right to retain its own legal counsel
and other advisors. All directors are encouraged to attend the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders. While we do not have a formal
attendance policy, all of our directors are encouraged to attend
our Annual Stockholder Meeting. Nine of our ten directors
attended the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Board
Structure and Risk Oversight
We have separate persons serving as Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer. Howard S. Cohen is our Chairman and
chairs our Board meetings. George R. Judd is our President and
Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman of the Board provides
general oversight and high level strategic planning for the
Company while the Chief Executive Officer manages the business
of the organization with a focus on daily operations as they
relate to the Companys long-term strategy. We believe this
structure is appropriate for the Company at this time as it
keeps board leadership separate from operational management.
Our Board monitors our exposure to a variety of risks. Risk may
be addressed from time to time by the full Board or by one or
more of our Board Committees. Senior management is responsible
for identifying and managing material risks faced by the Company
and periodically reports on such risks to the full Board or to
the appropriate Committee. Our audit committee charter gives the
Audit Committee responsibilities and duties that include
discussing with management, the internal audit department and
the independent auditors our major financial risk exposures and
the steps management has taken to monitor, control and minimize
such exposures. Liquidity risk, credit risk and risks associated
with our debt facilities and cash management are handled
primarily by our finance and accounting department, which
provides regular reports to our Audit Committee. The
Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing whether our
compensation programs encourage excessive risk taking by senior
executive management. General business and operational risks are
handled primarily by senior executive management, which
discusses any such risks as necessary during its regular
meetings with the Board. The Company also has established a risk
committee, comprised of functional area leaders within the
Company, which assists the internal audit group with monitoring
and addressing the Companys risks.
Lead
Director
The lead directors duties generally include serving as the
chairperson for all executive sessions of the non-management
directors and communicating to the Chief Executive Officer the
results of non-management executive board sessions.
Mr. Cohen, the Chairman of the Board, currently serves as
the Companys lead director. Any interested party may
contact the lead director by directing such communications to
the lead director
c/o Corporate
Secretary, BlueLinx Holdings Inc., 4300 Wildwood Parkway,
Atlanta, Georgia 30339. Any such correspondence received by us
will be forwarded to the lead director.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
The
Audit Committee
Our Board established a separately-designated standing Audit
Committee in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Exchange Act. The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist
our Board in fulfilling its responsibilities to oversee our
financial reporting process, including monitoring the integrity
of our financial statements and the independence and performance
of our internal and external auditors. The Audit Committee is
directly responsible for the appointment, compensation,
retention and oversight of our independent registered public
accounting firm.
The Audit Committee met eleven times in 2009. The Audit
Committee currently consists of Messrs. Grant, Marchese and
Schumacher. As discussed above, our Board has affirmatively
determined that Messrs. Grant, Marchese and Schumacher are
each independent, as such term is defined under the
rules of the SEC and the
5
listing standards of the NYSE applicable to audit committee
membership, and each meets the NYSEs financial literacy
requirements. Our Board has determined that Mr. Schumacher
is an audit committee financial expert, as such term
is defined under the applicable rules of the SEC.
The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, a
copy of which can be found on our website at
www.bluelinxco.com. Additionally, the audit committee
charter is available in print to any stockholder who requests it
by writing to BlueLinx Holdings Inc., attn: Corporate Secretary,
4300 Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339.
The Audit Committee has adopted a procedure to receive
allegations on any fraudulent accounting issues through a
toll-free telephone number as set out in our code of conduct and
ethics. See Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of
Ethics below.
The
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee oversees the determination of all
matters relating to employee compensation and benefits and is
empowered to: (1) establish a compensation policy for
executive officers, including setting base salaries and
incentive compensation; (2) review compensation practices
and trends and risks that may be created by the design of our
compensation programs; (3) make recommendations as to
compensation levels for executive officers; (4) approve
employment contracts; (5) administer our equity and other
incentive plans; and (6) undertake administration of other
employee benefit plans. The Compensation Committee currently
consists of Messrs. Marchese, Schumacher and Suwyn, and met
six times during 2009. As further described under
Controlled Company below, because we are a
controlled company, we are exempt from the
requirement that the Compensation Committee be comprised solely
of independent directors. Mr. Suwyn was formerly an advisor
to Cerberus, and as such, is not considered independent.
The Compensation Committee has formally engaged Hewitt
Associates to serve as an advisor to the Committee on executive
compensation issues and to provide recommendations as to
executive compensation levels. Hewitt provides ongoing executive
compensation advisory services for the Committee as its
independent compensation consultant. Although the Committee
referred to the compensation benchmarking survey provided by
Hewitt in October 2008, Hewitt did not make any specific
recommendations to the Committee in 2009. Hewitt did not provide
any other services to the Company in excess of $120,000.
Pursuant to the terms of its written charter, the Compensation
Committee may delegate certain of its duties and
responsibilities to a subcommittee consisting of one or more
members of the Committee, or to executive officers of the
Company. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a
written charter, a copy of which can be found on our website at
www.bluelinxco.com. Additionally, the charter is
available in print to any stockholder who requests it by writing
to BlueLinx Holdings Inc., attn: Corporate Secretary, 4300
Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339.
For more information on the role of the Compensation Committee
and its processes and procedures for considering and determining
executive officer compensation, see Compensation
Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 12 of this
proxy statement.
Controlled
Company
We are a controlled company for purposes of the NYSE
listing requirements. Our basis for this determination is that
Cerberus ABP Investor LLC, an affiliate of Cerberus, owns
18,100,000, or approximately 55% of the outstanding shares of
our common stock as of the Record Date. Accordingly, we are
exempt from the NYSE listing requirements that would otherwise
mandate (1) a majority of independent directors on our
Board, (2) a nominating committee of our Board, comprised
solely of independent directors, to select or recommend nominees
to our Board, and (3) a compensation committee of our
Board, comprised solely of independent directors, to determine
the compensation of our executive officers.
6
Nomination
Process
Because we are a controlled company, we do not have
a standing nominating committee comprised solely of independent
directors or any other committee performing similar functions.
Such matters are considered at meetings of our full Board. Due
to the size of our Board, we do not foresee an immediate need to
establish a separate nominating committee or adopt a charter to
govern the nomination process. In addition, because we are a
controlled company, we do not have a policy regarding our
consideration of nominations or recommendations for director
candidates by other stockholders. To the extent we receive any
such nominations or recommendations, they will be considered at
such time based on such factors as the Board considers relevant.
Our Board has generally used an informal process to identify and
evaluate director candidates. We believe that identifying and
nominating highly skilled and experienced director candidates is
critical to our future. Our Board has previously engaged third
parties to assist it in identifying qualified independent
director candidates. Our Board encourages all directors,
independent or otherwise, to identify potential director
nominees. As a result, our Board believes that it is presented
with a diverse and experienced group of candidates for
discussion and consideration.
During the evaluation process, our Board seeks to identify
director candidates with the highest personal and professional
ethics, integrity and values. While it has not adopted a formal
diversity policy, in the context of the needs of our Board at
any given point in time, our Board will seek candidates with
diverse experience in business, finance and other matters
relevant to a company such as ours, prominence in their
profession, concern for the interests of our stockholders and an
understanding of our business. Additionally, our Board requires
that director nominees have sufficient time to devote to our
business and affairs.
IDENTIFICATION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
The following table contains the name, age and position with our
company of each of our executive officers and directors as of
April 2, 2010. Their respective backgrounds are described
in the text following the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Howard S. Cohen
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors (Director since September
2007, Chairman since March 2008)
|
George R. Judd
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer Director (since October
2008)
|
H. Douglas Goforth
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
Dean A. Adelman
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Chief Administrative Officer
|
Richard S. Grant
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director (since 2005)
|
Richard B. Marchese
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director (since 2005)
|
Steven F. Mayer
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Director (since 2004)
|
Charles H. McElrea
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Director (since 2004)
|
Alan H. Schumacher
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Director (since 2004)
|
Mark A. Suwyn
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Director (since 2005)
|
Robert G. Warden
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Director (since 2004)
|
M. Richard Warner
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director (since 2008)
|
Executive
Officers
George R. Judd has served as our Chief Executive Officer
since November 2008 and as our President since May 2004. Prior
to that time, he worked for Georgia-Pacific Corporation in a
variety of positions managing both inside and outside sales,
national accounts and most recently as Vice President of Sales
and Eastern Operations from
2002-2004.
From 2000 until 2002, Mr. Judd worked as Vice President of
the
7
North and Midwest regions of the Distribution Division. He
served as Vice President of the Southeast region from 1999 to
2000. Mr. Judd serves on the board of the Girl Scouts of
Greater Atlanta and leads its design and construction committee.
He graduated from Western Connecticut State University in 1984
with a Bachelors degree in Marketing.
H. Douglas Goforth has served as our Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since February
2008. From November 2006 until February 2008, Mr. Goforth
served as Vice President and Corporate Controller for Armor
Holdings, Inc. which was acquired by BAE Systems in July 2007.
Previously he served as Corporate Controller for BlueLinx from
May 2004 until October 2006, where he played a key role in our
2004 IPO. From 2002 until 2004 he served as Controller for the
Distribution Division of Georgia-Pacific Corporation.
Mr. Goforth has 25 years of combined accounting,
finance, treasury, acquisition and management experience with
leading distribution and manufacturing companies including
Mitsubishi Wireless Communications, Inc., Yamaha Motor
Manufacturing, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand. Mr. Goforth serves
on the board of directors for the Arthritis Foundation of
Georgia. Mr. Goforth is a North Carolina State Board
Certified Public Accountant and earned a Bachelor of Science in
Accounting from Mars Hill College in North Carolina.
Dean A. Adelman has served as our Chief Administrative
Officer since May 2008 and as our Vice President, Human
Resources since October 2005. Prior to that time, he served as
Vice President Human Resources, Staff Development &
Training for Corrections Corporation of America. Previously,
Mr. Adelman served as Vice President Human Resources for
Arbys Inc. (formerly RTM Restaurant Group) from 1998 to
2002. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Adelman served as senior
counsel for Georgia-Pacific Corporation. Mr. Adelman
received his Masters of Business Administration from the Kellogg
School of Management at Northwestern University, a Juris Doctor
degree from the University of Georgia School of Law, and a
Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Georgia.
Nominees
for Election as Director
Howard S. Cohen has served as Chairman of our Board since
March 2008 and as a member of our Board since September 2007. He
is a Senior Advisor to Cerberus. Mr. Cohen served as our
Interim Chief Executive Officer from March 2008 through October
2008 and as our Executive Chairman from March 2008 through March
2009. Mr. Cohen possesses 33 years of leadership
experience, including service as President and CEO of four
publicly-traded companies: GTECH Corporation, from 2001 to 2002;
Bell & Howell, from 2000 to 2001; Sidus Systems Inc.,
from 1998 to 1999; and Peak Technologies Group, Inc., from 1996
to 1998. Mr. Cohen has also managed independent divisions
of three Fortune 500 companies. Mr. Cohen serves as
the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Albertsons LLC and
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC, both of which are Cerberus
portfolio companies. Mr. Cohen previously served on the
Board of SSA Global Technologies, Inc. from 2005 until 2007.
Mr. Cohens past experience as our interim Chief
Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, financial expertise,
management advisory expertise, experience as a director and
officer of public companies, relationship with our largest
stockholder and his performance as one of our Board members led
the Board to conclude he should continue to serve as a director
of the Company.
George R. Judd has served as a member of our Board since
October 2008. As an executive officer of our Company,
Mr. Judds background is described above.
Mr. Judds experience as our Chief Executive Officer,
years of experience with Georgia-Pacific Corporation and
BlueLinx in a variety of leadership roles, institutional
knowledge, management skills, industry knowledge and his
performance as one of our Board members led the Board to
conclude he should continue to serve as a director of the
Company.
Richard S. Grant has served as a member of our Board
since December 2005. Previously, Mr. Grant served as a
director of The BOC Group plc, until his retirement in 2002.
Over 30 years of service with The BOC Group, Mr. Grant
held various management positions, most recently as Chief
Executive of BOC Process Gas Solutions, Chairman of CNC sa, a
Mexican joint venture company, and he had group responsibility
for Technology, Latin America and Continental Europe. Previous
responsibilities included service as the BOC Regional Director
for South Pacific/South Asia, Chairman of Elgas Ltd, an
Australian LPG distributor, and before that as President of
Ohmeda Medical Devices and Chief Executive Officer of Glasrock
Home
8
Healthcare Inc. Mr. Grant currently serves on the Board of
Compass Minerals International Inc, where he is lead director, a
member of the audit committee and the nominating corporate
governance committee, of which he was previously Chairman.
Mr. Grant previously served as a director of Distributed
Energy Systems Corporation from 2006 to 2007.
Mr. Grants experience managing distribution
businesses, leadership experience, international board
experience, transactional experience, financial expertise,
experience as an officer and director of public companies,
independence and his performance as one of our Board members led
the Board to conclude he should continue to serve as a director
of the Company.
Richard B. Marchese has served as a member of our Board
since May 2005. He served as Vice President Finance, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of Georgia Gulf Corporation
since 1989 before retiring at the end of 2003. Prior to 1989,
Mr. Marchese served as the Controller of Georgia Gulf
Corporation, and prior to that he served as the Controller of
the Resin Division of Georgia-Pacific Corporation.
Mr. Marchese is a member of the board of directors of Nalco
Holding Company, Quality Distribution Inc. and Texas
Petrochemicals, Inc. and a member of the board of managers of
Quality Distribution LLC.
Mr. Marcheses extensive finance and operations
experience, experience in the oversight of financial reporting
and internal controls, experience as an officer and director of
public companies, independence and his performance as one of our
Board members led the Board to conclude he should continue to
serve as a director of the Company.
Steven F. Mayer has served as a member of our Board since
May 2004. He has been Managing Director of Cerberus California,
LLC and predecessor entities since November 2002 and also serves
as Co-Head of Private Equity at Cerberus. Prior to joining
Cerberus in 2002 and since 2001, Mr. Mayer was an Executive
Managing Director of Gores Technology Group. Prior to joining
Gores, from 1996 to 2001, Mr. Mayer was a Managing Director
of Libra Capital Partners, L.P. From 1994 until 1996,
Mr. Mayer was a Managing Director of Aries Capital Group,
LLC, a private equity investment firm that he co-founded. From
1992 until 1994, Mr. Mayer was a principal with Apollo
Advisors, L.P. and Lion Advisors, L.P., affiliated private
investment firms. Prior to that time, Mr. Mayer was an
attorney with Sullivan & Cromwell. Mr. Mayer is a
member of the boards of directors of LNR Property Holdings
Corp., Decision One Corporation, Spyglass Entertainment
Holdings, LLC and Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp.
Mr. Mayer previously served on the board of MAI Systems
Corporation from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Mayer received his A.B.,
cum laude, from Princeton University and his juris doctor
degree, magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School.
Mr. Mayers financial expertise, management advisory
expertise, experience as a director of public companies,
relationship with our largest stockholder and his performance as
one of our Board members led the Board to conclude he should
continue to serve as a director of the Company.
Charles H. (Chuck) McElrea served as our Chief Executive
Officer from May 2004 until his retirement from that position in
October 2005, and has served as a member of our Board since May
2004. Prior to that time, Mr. McElrea worked at
Georgia-Pacific for 26 years, most recently as President of
the Distribution Division for four years and as Vice President
of Finance, Information Technology and Strategy of
Containerboard and Packaging for one year. Mr. McElrea held
several other senior management positions including Vice
President of Distribution Division Integrated Business
Systems, Vice President of Packaging Division Business
Planning & Logistics, Vice President of
Pulp & Paper Logistics, Vice President of Purchasing
and Vice President of the Bleached Board Division. He also held
company positions in both manufacturing and finance/accounting.
Mr. McElrea received a Bachelors degree in Business
from California Polytechnic State University in 1977.
Mr. McElreas past experience as our Chief Executive
Officer, years of experience with Georgia-Pacific Corporation
and BlueLinx in a variety of leadership roles, institutional
knowledge, industry knowledge and his performance as one of our
Board members led the Board to conclude he should continue to
serve as a director of the Company.
Alan H. Schumacher has served as a member of our Board
since May 2004. He is a director of Noranda Aluminum Holding
Corporation, Equable Ascent Financial, LLC, North American Bus
Industries, Inc., School
9
Bus Holdings Inc. and Quality Distribution Inc. He is also a
member of the board of managers of Quality Distribution LLC.
Mr. Schumacher was a director of Anchor Glass Container
Inc. from 2003 to 2006. Mr. Schumacher is a member of the
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board and has served on
that board since 2002. Mr. Schumacher has 23 years of
experience working in various positions at American National Can
Corporation and American National Can Group, where, from 1997
until his retirement in 2000, he served as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer and, from 1988 through
1996, he served as Vice President, Controller and Chief
Accounting Officer.
Mr. Schumachers financial expertise (including his
qualification as an audit committee financial expert),
experience in the oversight of financial reporting and internal
controls, experience as an officer and director of public
companies, independence and his performance as one of our Board
members led the Board to conclude he should continue to serve as
a director of the Company.
Mark A. Suwyn has served as a member of our Board since
May 2005. Mr. Suwyn has served as the Chairman of NewPage
Corporation and NewPage Holding Corporation since May 2005.
Mr. Suwyn was the interim Chief Executive Officer of
NewPage from January 2010 to February 2010, was the Chief
Executive Officer of NewPage from March 2006 until March 2009.
Previously, he served as the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Louisiana-Pacific Corporation from 1996 to 2004. From
1992 to 1995, Mr. Suwyn served as Executive Vice President
of International Paper Co. Mr. Suwyn has also served as
Senior Vice President of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company.
Mr. Suwyn served on the boards of United Rentals Inc. from
2004 to 2007 and Unocal Corporation from 2004 to 2005.
Mr. Suwyn currently serves on the board of Ballard Power
Systems Inc. Mr. Suwyn has previously served as a senior member
of the operations team of Cerberus and as an advisor to
Cerberus. Cerberus is the indirect holder of a majority of the
outstanding shares of our common stock.
Mr. Suwyns leadership, extensive managerial
experience, management advisory expertise, experience as a
director and officer of public companies, industry knowledge and
experience, relationship with our largest stockholder and his
performance as one of our Board members led the Board to
conclude he should continue to serve as a director of the
Company.
Robert G. Warden has served as a member of our Board
since May 2004. Mr. Warden is a Managing Director of
Cerberus, which he joined in February 2003. Prior to joining
Cerberus, Mr. Warden was a Vice President at J.H. Whitney
from May 2000 to February 2003, a principal at Cornerstone
Equity Investors LLC from July 1998 to May 2000 and an associate
at Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette from July 1995 to July
1998. Mr. Warden graduated with an AB from Brown University
in 1995. Mr. Warden also serves on the boards of Aercap
Holdings N.V., Equable Ascent Financial, LLC and Four Points
Media Group LLC.
Mr. Wardens financial expertise, management advisory
expertise, experience as a director of public companies,
relationship with our largest stockholder and his performance as
one of our Board members led the Board to conclude he should
continue to serve as a director of the Company.
M. Richard Warner has served as a member of our
Board since March 2008. Mr. Warner is a consultant for
Cerberus. He served as the Interim Chief Financial Officer of
Equable Ascent Financial, LLC, a Cerberus portfolio company,
from February 2009 until June 2009. Prior to his work with
Cerberus, Mr. Warner was employed for more than
20 years in a variety of capacities at Temple-Inland Inc.,
most recently as a Senior Advisor during 2006, President from
2003 to 2005, Vice President & Chief Administrative
Officer from 1999 to 2003 and Vice President & General
Counsel from 1994 to 2002. Prior to joining Temple-Inland,
Mr. Warner was a commercial lawyer in private practice.
Mr. Warner currently serves on the boards of Balcones
Resources Inc. and Equable Ascent Financial, LLC.
Mr. Warner received his BBA degree, magna cum laude, from
Baylor University and his Juris Doctor degree from Baylor
University Law School.
Mr. Warners financial expertise, management advisory
expertise, experience as a director and officer of public
companies, industry knowledge and experience, relationship with
our largest stockholder and his performance as one of our Board
members led the Board to conclude he should continue to serve as
a director of the Company.
10
COMMUNICATIONS
WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to send
communications, including recommendations for director nominees,
to our Board or any individual director may do so by writing to
the Board of Directors, in care of our secretary, at our
principal executive offices, BlueLinx Holdings Inc., attn:
Corporate Secretary, 4300 Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia
30339. Your letter should indicate whether you are a
stockholder. Depending on the subject matter, our Corporate
Secretary will, as appropriate:
|
|
|
|
|
forward the communication to the director to whom it is
addressed or, in the case of communications addressed to the
Board of Directors generally, to the chairman;
|
|
|
|
attempt to handle the inquiry directly where it is a request for
information about us; or
|
|
|
|
not forward the communication if it is primarily commercial in
nature or if it relates to an improper topic.
|
Communications from interested parties that are complaints or
concerns relating to financial and accounting methods, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters should be sent to the
chairman of the Audit Committee, following the procedures set
forth above. Director nominations will be reviewed for
compliance with the requirements identified under
Submission of Stockholder Proposals on page 29
of this proxy statement and if they meet such requirements, will
be promptly forwarded to the director or directors identified in
the communication.
All communications will be summarized for our Board on a
periodic basis and each letter will be made available to any
director upon request.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table sets forth, as of April 2, 2010 (unless
otherwise indicated in the footnotes), certain information with
respect to our common stock owned beneficially by (1) each
director or director nominee, (2) each named executive
officer, (3) all executive officers and directors as a
group, and (4) each person known by us to be a beneficial
owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. Unless
otherwise noted, each of the persons listed has sole investment
and voting power with respect to the shares of common stock
included in the table. Beneficial ownership has been determined
in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the rules of the SEC, shares of
our common stock that a beneficial owner has a right to acquire
within 60 days pursuant to the exercise of stock options
are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing
percentage ownership of such owner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Outstanding(9)
|
|
|
Stephen Feinberg(1)(2)
|
|
|
18,100,000
|
|
|
|
55.47
|
%
|
Howard S. Cohen(3)
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
4.28
|
%
|
George R. Judd(4)
|
|
|
1,157,420
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
Howard D. Goforth
|
|
|
383,069
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
Dean A. Adelman(5)
|
|
|
307,262
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard S. Grant(6)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Richard B. Marchese(7)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Steven F. Mayer(8)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Charles H. McElrea
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
%
|
Alan H. Schumacher
|
|
|
7,750
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark A. Suwyn
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Robert G. Warden(2)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
M. Richard Warner
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)
|
|
|
3,635,501
|
|
|
|
10.92
|
%
|
11
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent. |
|
(1) |
|
Cerberus ABP Investor LLC is the record holder of
18,100,000 shares of our common stock. Mr. Feinberg
exercises sole voting and investment authority over all of our
securities owned by Cerberus ABP Investor LLC. Thus, pursuant to
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, Mr. Feinberg is deemed to
beneficially own 18,100,000 shares of our common stock. |
|
(2) |
|
The address for Messrs. Feinberg and Warden is
c/o Cerberus
Capital Management, L.P., 299 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10171. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Cohens ownership includes options to purchase
500,000 shares of our common stock which are exercisable as
of April 2, 2010, or that will become exercisable within
60 days of that date. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Judds ownership includes options to purchase
62,917 shares of our common stock which are exercisable as
of April 2, 2010, or that will become exercisable within
60 days of that date. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Adelmans ownership includes options to purchase
30,936 shares of our common stock which are exercisable as
of April 2, 2010, or that will become exercisable within
60 days of that date. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Grants ownership includes options to purchase
10,000 shares of our common stock which are exercisable as
of April 2, 2010, or that will become exercisable within
60 days of that date. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Marcheses ownership includes options to purchase
10,000 shares of our common stock which are exercisable as
of April 2, 2010, or that will become exercisable within
60 days of that date. |
|
(8) |
|
The address for Mr. Mayer is
c/o Cerberus
California, LLC, 11812 San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles,
CA 90049. |
|
(9) |
|
The percentage calculations are based on 32,676,562 shares
of our common stock outstanding on April 2, 2010. |
SECTION 16
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors
and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our
equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership and
reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely on
our review of the copies of such reports received by us with
respect to transactions during 2009, or written representations
from certain reporting persons, we believe that our directors,
executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our
equity securities have complied with all applicable filing
requirements for 2009.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, referred
to in this discussion as the Committee, is responsible for
reviewing, establishing and approving the compensation of our
named executive officers. Compensation paid to our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the other named
executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table
is set forth under Compensation of Executive
Officers below. The following discussion and analysis
focuses on compensation to our named executive officers for 2009.
The Committee regularly consults with management regarding
employee compensation matters. Mr. Judds compensation
was adjusted on November 1, 2008 when he entered into an
employment agreement with the Company to serve as our Chief
Executive Officer. Our Board of Directors established a Search
Committee in March 2008 to lead and coordinate the search for a
permanent chief executive officer. The Search Committee included
Messrs. Suwyn, Schumacher, Grant, and Cohen. The Search
Committee engaged an executive search firm to assist in
identifying qualified candidates for the chief executive officer
role. The Search Committee members interviewed internal and
external candidates for the role before ultimately recommending
Mr. Judd for the position. The terms of his employment
agreement were established based on a review of the compensation
he was receiving in his capacity as our President and Chief
Operating Officer, the compensation necessary to hire a
qualified chief executive officer from outside of the Company,
as well as our review of the
12
market data for chief executive officer compensation at
comparator companies which was provided to the Committee by its
outside compensation consultant, Hewitt Associates, in its 2008
compensation benchmarking survey.
Our Chief Executive Officer makes compensation recommendations
to the Committee for the other named executive officers. The
Committee also considers market factors in making decisions
about our compensation program. In this regard, in 2005, the
Committee retained Hewitt Associates to advise it on executive
compensation matters and to provide compensation recommendations
as to our executive officers. The Committee and the Company
periodically discuss compensation issues and solicit
compensation advice and data from Hewitt. At the request of the
Committee, Hewitt provided an updated compensation benchmarking
study to the Company in October 2008. The following discussion
and analysis, which was reviewed and approved by the Committee,
analyzes the objectives and results for 2009 of our named
executive officer compensation policies and procedures.
Compensation
Policies and Objectives
Our primary goal is to establish a compensation program that
serves the long-term interests of the Company and our
stockholders by aligning managements interests with that
of our stockholders through equity ownership and by promoting
the attainment of certain individual and corporate goals. In
addition, our compensation program is designed to attract and
retain top quality executives with the qualifications necessary
for the long-term financial success of the Company.
Our executive compensation program is based on the following
principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation decisions are driven by a
pay-for-performance
philosophy, which takes into account performance by both the
Company and the individual;
|
|
|
|
Performance is determined with reference to pre-established
goals, both with respect to the Company and the individual,
which we believe enhances the individual executives
performance;
|
|
|
|
Where possible, a significant component of total direct
compensation should consist of variable compensation;
|
|
|
|
Total compensation opportunity should be comparable to the
median ranges in the marketplace within which we
compete; and
|
|
|
|
Increased compensation can be earned through an
individuals increased contribution to the Company.
|
Compensation programs in which our named executive officers
participate are designed to be competitive with the compensation
programs of companies with whom we compete for executive talent
in order to enhance our ability to attract and retain key
executive leadership. In this regard, the Committee directed the
Company to engage Hewitt Associates to perform a benchmark study
of the Companys compensation structure in 2008. In
evaluating our compensation program, the Committee considered
the level of compensation paid to executive officers in
comparable executive positions within a comparator group
consisting of eighteen distribution companies and two building
products companies selected by BlueLinx with annual revenues
between $645 million and $10.8 billion. The companies
within the group were selected based on size, industry focus and
organizational status and we believe as a group they represent
the appropriate comparable labor market for executive talent.
This group comprised the following companies: Amcon Distributing
Company; Andersons Inc.; Applied Industrial Technologies Inc.;
Beacon Roofing Supply Inc.; Building Materials Holding
Corporation; Builders FirstSource Inc.; Fastenal Company; GATX
Corp.; Genuine Parts Company; Huttig Building Products Inc.;
Interline Brands Inc.; MSC Industrial Direct; Nash Finch Co.;
RSC Holdings Inc.; Rush Enterprises Inc.; United Rentals Inc.;
Universal Forest Products; Watsco Inc.; Wesco International
Inc.; and WW Grainger Inc.
Hewitts comprehensive benchmarking study focused on a
number of elements to compare the Company to companies within
these comparator groups, including base salaries, target bonuses
and actual bonuses paid, actual annual equity awards, total cash
compensation, benefits and total compensation. The Company and
the Committee reviewed information from these comparator
companies and used the data as a reference point to
13
assist them in establishing the compensation program for the
Company, setting our executive officers compensation and
benefits to be competitive with those of executive officers in
similar positions at these comparator companies and to achieve a
balance of incentives to help achieve our performance
objectives. Although the Committee does not tie executive
compensation to a single reference benchmark or target within
the comparator group, the Committee generally considers the
50th and
75th
percentiles of companies within the comparator group. The
benchmarking study is used as a comparative tool in the
Committees evaluation of the Companys executive
compensation in relation to companies believed to represent the
appropriate comparable labor market for executive talent.
The Committee periodically consults with Hewitt on compensation
issues and may periodically engage consultants in the future to
advise on the ongoing competitiveness of our compensation
programs as warranted. In addition, the Committee periodically
reviews and revises salary ranges and total compensation
programs to develop compensation ranges that it believes will
position us within the same range as market salaries for similar
positions in our industry based on market information obtained
from consultation with Hewitt, informal market surveys, various
trade group publications and other publicly available
information.
Elements
of Compensation
Compensation for our named executive officers consists of four
general components:
|
|
|
|
|
Base salary;
|
|
|
|
Annual performance-based cash awards;
|
|
|
|
Long-term equity incentive compensation; and
|
|
|
|
Other perquisite and benefit programs.
|
The appropriate mix and amount of compensation for each
executive officer varies based on the level of the
executives responsibilities, as determined by the
Committee in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer. Our
Chief Executive Officers compensation structure is largely
established by his employment agreement. The Committee may
increase any component of compensation provided by an employment
agreement to any of our named executive officers. There is no
established policy or formula for allocating any
individuals total compensation between cash and non-cash,
or between short-term and long-term incentives. This approach is
designed to provide the Company with flexibility to respond to
marketplace and individual factors in attracting and retaining
executive talent and encouraging performance.
The Committee typically reviews and adjusts base salaries and
awards of cash bonuses and equity-based compensation on an
annual basis. Our former Chief Executive Officer presented
recommendations and proposals on 2009 compensation, which were
developed in consultation with our Chief Administrative Officer
and other Company representatives, to the Committee, including
recommended base salaries, recommended structure, target levels
and payout levels for the annual cash bonus program under the
Companys short term incentive plan (STIP), and
recommended equity awards to executive officers, and
managements rationale for its recommendations. The
Compensation Committee considered these recommendations before
determining compensation. The named executive officers
base salaries were not increased or decreased during 2009. As
discussed in our prior year Proxy Statement, the Compensation
Committee recommended that Mr. Goforths base salary
be increased to $375,000 beginning in January 2009.
Mr. Goforth requested this recommended salary increase be
deferred and his annual base salary remained unchanged during
2009. Beginning on January 1, 2010, Mr. Goforths
annual base salary was adjusted to the $375,000 level previously
recommended by the Committee in 2008.
Base
Salary
Base salaries represent a fixed portion of named executive
officer compensation and vary by job responsibility. We provide
base salary because it is standard in the marketplace and
provides a stable part of compensation to encourage retention.
Named executive officer salaries generally are reviewed and
approved annually by the Committee. Additionally, periodic
salary adjustments are considered upon a promotion, change
14
in job responsibility or when otherwise necessary for equitable
reasons. The Chief Executive Officers base salary was
established in his employment agreement, and the Committee
consults with the Chief Executive Officer regarding the salaries
of the other named executive officers. The Committee then
considers such matters and approves base salary as to the named
executive officers. The Committee primarily considers the
recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer, market data, a
general review of the executives compensation
(individually and relative to the other executives), and the
individual performance of the executive.
Annual
Bonuses
We utilize cash bonuses as an incentive to promote achievement
of individual and Company performance goals. This component of
compensation places more emphasis on our annual financial
performance and the potential rewards associated with future
performance of the Company and the individual executive. Annual
bonuses are determined based on agreements with the individual
executive as well as pursuant to the Companys STIP. Cash
incentives are designed to:
|
|
|
|
|
Support our strategic business objectives;
|
|
|
|
Promote the attainment of specific financial goals;
|
|
|
|
Reward achievement of specific performance objectives; and
|
|
|
|
Encourage teamwork.
|
Under the STIP, an annual bonus pool is established and funded
based solely on performance as measured against established
business
and/or
financial goals at different levels of the Companys
operating structure. The Committee establishes the bonus pool
based on Company performance. In general, the bonus pool is
allocated to each participant based on the participants
target bonus percentage (a percentage of such
participants current base salary) and the extent to which
the Company
and/or such
participants operating group(s) meets the established
business
and/or
financial goals. Each of the named executive officers is a
participant in the STIP, and each of their annual bonuses are
subject to adjustment by the Committee, in its discretion, based
on the executives individual performance and contribution
to the Company during the year. The threshold, target and
maximum bonus percentages for 2009 for each of the named
executive officers as a percentage of each executives base
salary were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
George R. Judd
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
H. Douglas Goforth
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
%
|
|
|
130
|
%
|
Dean A. Adelman
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Howard S. Cohen(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Cohen was not eligible to participate in the STIP for
2009 as he ceased to be an executive officer of the Company as
of April 1, 2009. |
In February 2009, the Committee approved the STIP goals for
2009, which provide for cash incentives upon the achievement of
pre-established corporate goals. At such time, the Committee
established the financial goals used in establishing bonus
targets for 2009 under the STIP.
Generally, the Committee sets the target levels for financial
performance metrics for the STIP in alignment with the
Companys strategic plan. In making the annual
determination of the threshold, target and maximum levels, the
Committee may consider specific circumstances facing the Company
during the year. For 2009, 50% of a named executive
officers potential STIP award was based on corporate
earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) targets and 50% of the potential STIP was based on
15
corporate free cash flow targets. Each objective is measured
separately against a threshold, target and maximum goal. For
2009, these goals were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold ($)
|
|
Target ($)
|
|
Maximum ($)
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
Free Cash Flow
|
|
|
(61.0
|
)
|
|
|
(30.0
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
We define EBITDA for these purposes as net earnings plus
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for
non-cash items and other items that are allowed at the
discretion of the Committee. We define free cash flow as
operating cash flow minus capital expenditures.
For purposes of STIP calculations, during 2009 the Company
achieved EBITDA of $0.2 million and free cash flow of
negative $21.7 million. The Committee determined that the
Companys EBITDA achievement fell below the threshold
payout levels for the named executive officers and free cash
flow achievement fell between the target and maximum payout
levels. However, the Company determined that the Companys
free cash flow performance was primarily due to a slower than
anticipated sales pace caused by the continued decline in new
housing starts during the year. Due to the soft economic
environment, the Company did not invest as much as it originally
planned to invest in new inventory. Therefore, management made a
recommendation to the Committee that it was not appropriate to
compensate the named executive officers based on the
Companys free cash flow performance for 2009. The
Committee agreed with managements recommendation and the
named executive officers were not awarded any bonus compensation
based on the Companys financial performance in 2009. The
table below illustrates how we calculate STIP payments and the
fact no such payments were made to our named executive officers
in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion of
|
|
Target
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Payout
|
|
Actual
|
|
Payout
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout
|
|
Related to
|
|
Payout
|
|
Related to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Related to
|
|
Free Cash
|
|
Related to
|
|
Free Cash
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Base
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
Flow Goal
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
Flow Goal
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Target
|
|
Payout
|
|
Goal (50%)
|
|
(50%)
|
|
Goal (0%)
|
|
(0%)
|
|
Payout
|
Officer
|
|
($)
|
|
Bonus %
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
George R. Judd
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
H. Douglas Goforth
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
105,625
|
|
|
|
105,625
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Dean A. Adelman
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
78,750
|
|
|
|
78,750
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Cohen was not eligible to participate in the STIP as he
ceased to be an executive officer of the Company as of
April 1, 2009. |
For 2010, the Committee established the named executive
officers STIP financial performance objective to be solely
based on EBITDA. Due to the continued weak outlook for the
housing market, we believe it will be a challenge to achieve the
target financial goal in 2010 for funding of the STIP at its
target funding level. The maximum financial goals were designed
to be difficult to achieve, and we believe they will be.
Long
Term Equity Incentive Plan
The purpose of our Long Term Equity Incentive Plan, or LTIP, is
to provide an incentive to our employees to work towards the
achievement of our long term performance goals. A further
purpose of the LTIP is to provide a means through which we may
better attract able individuals to become employees of the
Company by providing these individuals with stock ownership. We
also consider the program a key retention tool. For all of these
reasons, we believe this component of compensation further
advances and aligns the interests of the Company and its
stockholders. LTIP grants are made annually. On May 29,
2007, the Compensation Committee resolved to set the date on
which annual LTIP grants would be made to executive officers to
the second Tuesday of each fiscal year. The Committee has the
discretion to make additional LTIP grants at any time during the
year. Such grants generally will be in connection with new hires
or promotions within the Company.
16
In making decisions regarding long-term equity incentive awards
for named executive officers, the Committee reviews the
comparable equity award data for similar positions in our
industry, market data and data from our compensation consultant,
and also considers other relevant factors.
On January 13, 2009, the Committee awarded a total of
651,150 shares of restricted stock to the Companys
executives, which included the following grants to the named
executive officers: Mr. Judd (236,782 restricted shares);
Mr. Goforth (138,123 restricted shares); and
Mr. Adelman (118,391 restricted shares). The restricted
stock awards vest three years from the date of the grant. The
value of these awards was based on the market price of our
common stock at the date of the grant. The Committee considered
the total dollar value of each executive officers award
when approving each grant.
Further information on equity ownership can be found below in
Compensation of Executive Officers.
Defined
Contribution Plan
The Company historically provides retirement benefits to the
named executive officers, including matching contributions,
under the terms of its tax-qualified 401(k) defined contribution
plan. In 2009, the Company suspended its matching contributions
to the 401(k) plan for all employees until business conditions
improve. The named executive officers participate in the plan on
substantially the same terms as our other participating
employees. We believe that these benefits are comparable to
those provided by comparable companies. The Company does not
maintain any defined benefit or supplemental retirement plans
for its executive officers.
Perquisites
and Other Personal Benefits
The Company provides the named executive officers with
perquisites and other personal benefits that the Company
believes are reasonable, competitive in the market and
consistent with its overall compensation program to better
enable the Company to attract and retain superior employees for
key positions. The named executive officers are generally
provided a car allowance, payment of certain club dues, life
insurance and reimbursement for relocation expenses, if
applicable. The Committee periodically reviews the levels of
perquisites and other personal benefits provided to named
executive officers.
Costs of the perquisites and personal benefits described above
for the named executive officers for 2009 that meet the
threshold established by SEC regulations are included in the
Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement in the
All Other Compensation column. See
Compensation of Executive Officers.
Employment
Agreements
We use employment agreements to attract
and/or
retain executive officers to BlueLinx. We primarily serve the
housing and remodeling industries which are historically
cyclical industries. Employment agreements enhance our ability
to attract and retain top executive talent by providing some
degree of certainty in light of these major cycles. The
Committee, with assistance from our human resources department
and legal counsel both inside and outside of the Company,
establish and negotiate the terms of the employment agreements.
The Committee believes multi-year employment agreements are
necessary to secure executive talent for the long-term benefit
of the Company and our shareholders. The Committee further
believes that not utilizing employment agreements would put us
at a competitive disadvantage to our peers in recruiting
executives. Our employment agreements also include
confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation
provisions, all for the benefit of the Company. Consistent with
our compensation philosophy, the employment agreements provide
for a significant component of each executives annual
compensation to be variable, as cash bonuses under our STIP are
awarded based on Company performance against pre-established
financial or operational goals. For example, no cash bonuses
were paid to our named executive officers based on our 2009
financial performance. Additionally, the value of annual equity
compensation is determined by our common stock price so our
executives interests are aligned with those of our
shareholders in this regard.
17
Employment
Agreement with Chief Executive Officer
We entered into an employment agreement with George R. Judd to
serve as our Chief Executive Officer effective November 1,
2008. The Employment Agreement expires on November 1, 2010,
except that it will be renewed automatically for an additional
one-year period unless ninety days prior written notice is given
by either party in advance of any one-year period. The
Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Judd will receive a
base salary at the rate of $600,000 per year. Mr. Judd
shall also be eligible to receive an annual bonus pursuant to
the terms of our annual bonus plan, with the annual bonus
potential to be a target of 100% of his base salary up to a
maximum of 200% of base salary, based upon satisfaction of
performance goals and bonus criteria to be defined and approved
by the Compensation Committee in advance for each fiscal year in
accordance with the terms of the applicable bonus plan. In
addition, the Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Judd
is eligible to participate in all benefit programs for which
senior executives are generally eligible. The Committee reviewed
the Hewitt Associates benchmark study and considered the level
of compensation paid to chief executive officers within the
comparator group of companies as a factor in establishing his
compensation.
Under his Employment Agreement, the Company may terminate
Mr. Judds employment for cause or without cause. If
Mr. Judds employment is terminated without cause or
he resigns for good reason, the Employment Agreement provides
Mr. Judd with, among other things, payment equal to one
time his annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the
date of termination, plus one time the cash bonus amount
received by Mr. Judd for the fiscal year prior to the year
of the termination of his employment, payable in twelve equal
monthly installments commencing six months after the date of
termination. The Employment Agreement also contains
confidentiality provisions, as well as a covenant not to compete
during the employment term and continuing for a period of
eighteen months following his date of termination in the event
executive is terminated without cause, he voluntarily resigns or
resigns for good reason, or the employment period ends.
Employment
Agreement with Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Goforths employment agreement with BlueLinx was
effective February 18, 2008. The Agreement is scheduled to
expire on February 18, 2011, except that it will be renewed
automatically for one additional year unless either party
provides prior written notice of non-renewal thirty days in
advance of the original expiration date. The employment
agreement provides that Mr. Goforths annual base
salary shall be paid at the rate of $375,000 per year, prorated
for the portion of any partial year during which he is employed
by the Company. Mr. Goforth shall also be eligible to
receive an annual bonus pursuant to the terms of the
Companys annual bonus plan, with the annual bonus
potential to be a target of 65% of his base salary up to a
maximum of 130% of base salary, based upon satisfaction of
performance goals and bonus criteria to be defined and approved
by the Committee in advance for each fiscal year in accordance
with the terms of the bonus plan. In addition, the Agreement
provides that Mr. Goforth is eligible to participate in all
benefit programs for which senior executives are generally
eligible.
Mr. Goforth also received 60,000 restricted shares of the
Companys common stock on February 18, 2008 as part of
his incentive package to join the Company. The shares were
issued pursuant to the Companys 2004 Long Term Equity
Incentive Plan. The shares vest over a three-year period, but if
Mr. Goforths employment is terminated without cause
or if he resigns for good reason within the first three years,
these 60,000 shares will immediately vest.
Mr. Goforths compensation under the Agreement was
structured and negotiated to recruit him to join our Company.
Additionally, the Committee reviewed the Hewitt Associates
benchmark study and considered the level of compensation paid to
executive officers in comparable executive positions to
Mr. Goforth within the comparator group of companies to
establish his compensation under the Employment Agreement.
18
Under his Agreement, the Company may terminate
Mr. Goforths employment for cause or without cause.
If Mr. Goforths employment is terminated without
cause or he resigns for good reason, the Agreement provides
Mr. Goforth with, among other things, payment equal to one
time his annual base salary in effect immediately prior to the
date of termination, plus one time the cash bonus amount equal
to the target bonus amount Mr. Goforth was eligible to
receive for the fiscal year prior to the year of the termination
of his employment. Such sum is payable in twelve equal monthly
installments commencing six months after the date of
termination. The Employment Agreement also contains
confidentiality provisions, as well as a covenant not to compete
during the employment term and continuing for a period of
eighteen months following his date of termination.
Employment
Agreement with Chief Administrative Officer
Mr. Adelmans employment agreement with BlueLinx was
effective June 4, 2009. The Agreement is scheduled to
expire on June 4, 2011, except that it will be renewed
automatically for an additional one-year period unless ninety
days prior written notice is given by either party in advance of
any one-year period. Mr. Adelmans annual base salary
shall be paid at the rate of $315,000 per year. Mr. Adelman
shall also be eligible to receive an annual bonus pursuant to
the terms of our annual bonus plan, with the annual bonus
potential to be a target of 50% of his base salary up to a
maximum of 100% of base salary, based upon satisfaction of
performance goals and bonus criteria to be defined and approved
by the Compensation Committee in advance for each fiscal year in
accordance with the terms of the applicable bonus plan. In
addition, the Employment Agreement provides that
Mr. Adelman is eligible to participate in all benefit
programs for which senior executives are generally eligible. The
Committee reviewed the Hewitt Associates benchmark study and
considered the level of compensation paid to executive officers
in comparable executive positions to Mr. Adelman within the
comparator group of companies to establish his compensation
under the Employment Agreement.
Under his Employment Agreement, the Company may terminate
Mr. Adelmans employment for cause or without cause.
If Mr. Adelmans employment is terminated without
cause or he resigns for good reason, the Employment Agreement
provides Mr. Adelman with, among other things, payment
equal to one time his annual base salary in effect immediately
prior to the date of termination, plus one time the annual
target bonus amount for Mr. Adelman for the fiscal year
prior to the year of the termination of his employment, payable
in twelve equal monthly installments commencing six months after
the date of termination. The Employment Agreement also contains
confidentiality provisions, as well as a covenant not to compete
during the employment term and continuing for a period of
eighteen months following his date of termination in the event
executive is terminated without cause, he voluntarily resigns or
resigns for good reason, or the employment period ends.
Risk
Analysis of Compensation Program
The Committee has reviewed our compensation program to determine
if the elements encourage excessive or unnecessary risk taking
that reasonably could have a material adverse effect on the
Company. There is no objective way to measure risk resulting
from a companys compensation program; therefore, such
analysis is subjective in nature. After reviewing our
compensation program, the Committee believes that the only
elements that could incentivize risk taking are the annual cash
incentives under the STIP and awards made under the LTIP with
payouts dependent on the achievement of certain performance
levels by the Company. Since base salaries are fixed, they do
not encourage risk taking. The same is true of awards under the
LTIP that include only time-based vesting. Based upon the value
of each of these elements to the overall compensation mix and
the relative value each has to the other, the Committee believes
that the Companys compensation program is appropriately
balanced. The Committee believes that the mix of short- and
long-term awards minimizes risks that may be taken, as any risks
taken for short-term gains could ultimately jeopardize the
Companys ability to meet the long-term performance
objectives and appreciation in the Companys stock price.
In addition, the Committee believes that the establishment of
reasonable performance goals, the capping of payouts and the
avoidance of any steep payout changes at the various payout
levels of the performance based STIP and LTIP compensation
components further reduce any risk-taking incentive that may be
19
associated with these compensation elements. As a result, the
Committee does not believe that our compensation program
incentivizes unreasonable risk taking.
Internal
Revenue Code Section 162(m)
In making compensation decisions, the Committee also considers
the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(Section 162(m)). Section 162(m) disallows
a tax deduction for any publicly held corporation for individual
compensation exceeding $1 million in any taxable year for
the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers,
other than compensation that is performance-based under a plan
that is approved by the stockholders of the Company and meets
other technical requirements. However, the Committee reserves
the right to provide for compensation to executive officers that
may not be deductible if it believes such compensation is in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above
with management. Based on such review and discussions, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that such
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy
Statement and incorporated by reference into the Companys
2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Mark Suwyn, Chairman
Alan Schumacher
Richard Marchese
COMPENSATION
OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
2009
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the cash and non-cash
compensation for 2009, 2008 and 2007, awarded or earned by our
Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our
two other named executive officers during 2009. We refer to
these individuals as our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Plan Comp.
|
|
Comp.
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
Howard S. Cohen,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
376,153
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7,923
|
|
|
|
384,076
|
|
Chairman (Former
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
605,769
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,702,500
|
|
|
|
3,642,500
|
|
|
|
657,646
|
|
|
|
88,615
|
|
|
|
6,697,030
|
|
Executive Chairman)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George R. Judd,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
603,794
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
17,275
|
|
|
|
1,221,069
|
|
President and Chief
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
473,077
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
661,140
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
546,172
|
|
|
|
29,630
|
|
|
|
1,710,019
|
|
Executive Officer(5)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
428,462
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
792,335
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
29,972
|
|
|
|
1,370,769
|
|
H. Douglas Goforth,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
326,923
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
352,214
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
16,530
|
|
|
|
695,667
|
|
CFO & Treasurer(6)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
281,250
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
641,840
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
390,781
|
|
|
|
110,623
|
|
|
|
1,424,494
|
|
Dean A. Adelman,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
301,897
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
619,927
|
|
Chief Administrative
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
233,034
|
|
|
|
82,871
|
|
|
|
176,141
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
247,129
|
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
753,983
|
|
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts in this column were calculated based on the grant
date fair value of our common stock, in accordance with FASB ASC
Topic 718. The value of performance based shares included in
this column was calculated based on the probable outcome of the
performance conditions as of the grant date of the performance
shares. Stock and performance share awards generally vest in
various increments over multi-year periods. As a result, this
grant date fair value may not be indicative of the ultimate
value the executive may receive under these grants. |
20
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in this column for 2007 and 2008 include performance
shares valued as follows: Mr. Judd, 2007: $443,881; 2008:
$347,609; Mr. Goforth 2008: $189,840; Mr. Adelman,
2007: $118,261; 2008: $92,610. If the maximum performance
metrics were achieved the same performance shares would be
valued as follows: Mr. Judd, 2007: $665,822; 2008:
$521,414; Mr. Goforth 2008: $284,760; Mr. Adelman,
2007: $177,392; 2008: $138,915. |
|
|
|
Based on the Companys financial results for the period
from 2007 through 2009, the performance shares issued in 2007
did not vest due to the fact the performance criteria was not
achieved. As a result the named executive officers did not
receive any value for these grants. Based on the Companys
financial results for the period from 2008 through 2009, the
Company currently believes the actual number of shares in which
the executives will vest with respect to the performance shares
issued in 2008 will be below the target number of performance
shares issued. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts in this column were calculated based on the grant
date fair value of stock options computed using the
Black-Scholes model, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For
additional information regarding the assumptions used in
determining fair value using the Black-Scholes pricing model,
see Note 7, Stock-Based Compensation, to our
audited consolidated financial statements included in our
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 2, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
For fiscal 2009, the Committee determined that the
Companys EBITDA achievement fell below the threshold
payout levels for the named executive officers and free cash
flow achievement fell between the target and maximum payout
levels. However, the Company determined that the Companys
free cash flow performance was primarily due to a slower than
anticipated sales pace caused by the continued decline in new
housing starts during the year. Management made a recommendation
to the Committee that it was not appropriate to compensate the
named executive officers based on the Companys free cash
flow performance for 2009. The Committee agreed with
managements recommendation and the named executive
officers were not awarded any bonus compensation based on the
Companys financial performance in 2009. Any guaranteed
bonuses or discretionary bonuses paid to a named executive
officer are reflected separately in the column titled
Bonus. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Cohen served as our Executive Chairman until
April 1, 2009. He currently serves as non-executive
Chairman. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Judds All Other Compensation for 2009
includes an auto allowance of $7,620; a club dues allowance of
$6,000 and insurance premiums paid by the Company of $3,655. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Goforths All Other Compensation for
2009 includes an auto allowance of $7,500; a club dues allowance
of $6,000 and insurance premiums paid by the Company of $3,030. |
GRANTS OF
PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2009
The table below sets forth information regarding all grants of
awards made to the named executive officers during 2009. For
further information regarding the terms of certain of these
grants pursuant to employment agreements with the named
executive officers, see Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Employment Agreements and Change in Control
Agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
All Other
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Base Price
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards(1)
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
# of Shares
|
|
of Option
|
|
and Option
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Max
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Max
|
|
# of
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
Name
|
|
Date
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
(#)
|
|
Shares(2)
|
|
Option
|
|
($/sh)
|
|
($)
|
|
Howard S. Cohen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George R. Judd
|
|
N/A
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1/13/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603,794
|
|
Howard D. Goforth
|
|
N/A
|
|
105,625
|
|
|
211,250
|
|
|
|
422,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1/13/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352,214
|
|
Dean A. Adelman
|
|
N/A
|
|
78,750
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1/13/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,897
|
|
21
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These columns show the range of possible payouts which were
targeted for 2009 performance under the Companys STIP as
described in the section titled Annual Bonuses in
the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and are based on the
named executive officers base salary for 2009. The Company
recommended and the Committee agreed no bonuses would be paid to
the named executive officers based on the Companys
financial results for 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The restricted stock grants disclosed in the table were all
issued pursuant to the Companys 2004 or 2006 LTIP. Each of
the restricted stock awards vest three years from the date of
grant. |
2009
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT YEAR END
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to unexercised stock options and unvested shares of restricted
stock held on January 2, 2010 by each of our named
executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
Market or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Number of
|
|
Payout Value
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
Unearned
|
|
of Unearned
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Shares, Units,
|
|
Shares, Units
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Stock That
|
|
or Other
|
|
or Other
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
Stock That
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Rights That
|
|
Rights That
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Vested
|
|
Have Not
|
|
Have Not
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Vested
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
Vested (#)(4)
|
|
Vested ($)(1)
|
|
Howard S. Cohen
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
3/10/18
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,385,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
George R. Judd
|
|
|
47,187
|
|
|
|
31,460
|
(3)
|
|
|
14.01
|
|
|
|
6/5/16
|
|
|
|
360,700
|
|
|
|
999,139
|
|
|
|
96,558
|
|
|
|
267,466
|
|
Howard D. Goforth
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,790
|
|
|
|
622,668
|
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
116,340
|
|
Dean A. Adelman
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
|
|
11/9/15
|
|
|
|
151,495
|
|
|
|
419,641
|
|
|
|
25,725
|
|
|
|
64,272
|
|
|
|
|
12,702
|
|
|
|
8,467
|
(3)
|
|
|
14.01
|
|
|
|
6/5/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Computed based on the closing price of our common stock on
January 2, 2010 of $2.77. |
|
(2) |
|
These unvested options vest in two equal installments on each of
March 10, 2010 and 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
These unvested options vest in two equal installments on each of
January 3, 2010 and 2011. |
|
(4) |
|
The number of shares reported is the target number of
performance shares granted in January 2008 (based on 2008 to
2009 performance between threshold and target goals for these
shares). If the Company achieves the maximum performance goals
for these shares, Mr. Judd would receive
144,837 shares, Mr. Goforth 63,000 shares and
Mr. Adelman 38,588 shares. The performance share
grants are scheduled to vest after a three-year period if the
Company exceeds certain financial metrics. Otherwise, the
performance shares are forfeited. The performance shares granted
to the named executive officers in March 2007 were forfeited at
the end of fiscal 2009 because the Company did not achieve the
required financial metrics. |
OPTION
EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
|
Acquired on Vesting
|
|
on Vesting
|
|
Howard S. Cohen
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
George R. Judd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Douglas Goforth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dean A. Adelman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
upon Certain Events of Termination or
Change-in-Control
As described above under Employment Agreements,
certain of our named executive officers are entitled to receive
payments in connection with the termination of their employment
by the Company for certain
22
reasons or in connection with a change in control of the
Company. Additionally, our named executive officers hold equity
awards issued pursuant to our 2004 LTIP and our 2006 LTIP.
Options and restricted stock issued pursuant to these plans
generally vest automatically upon a change in control of the
Company.
The following table describes the estimated present value of
unvested stock options, restricted stock awards and performance
shares that would have immediately vested in the event that the
named executive officers employment was terminated by
reason of death or disability on January 2, 2010 or if a
change in control of the Company occurred on such date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
Value of
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
Restricted Stock(1)
|
|
Shares(1)
|
|
Total(1)
|
|
Howard S. Cohen
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
1,385,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,385,000
|
|
George R. Judd
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
999,139
|
|
|
$
|
267,466
|
|
|
$
|
1,266,605
|
|
H. Douglas Goforth
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
622,668
|
|
|
$
|
116,340
|
|
|
$
|
739,008
|
|
Dean A. Adelman
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
419,641
|
|
|
$
|
71,258
|
|
|
$
|
490,899
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Computed based on the closing price of our common stock on
January 2, 2010 of $2.77. |
In addition to accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards,
our named executive officers are entitled to receive certain
other payments in connection with certain termination events. In
the case of Messrs. Judd, Goforth and Adelman, any of the
Companys obligations to make cash payments following the
termination of their respective employment is contingent upon
the executive complying with the restrictive covenants contained
in their respective agreements. These restrictive covenants
prohibit, during periods defined in the agreements and subject
to certain limited exceptions, (i) competing with the
Company, (ii) employing or soliciting Company employees,
(iii) interfering with Company relationships with its
customers or vendors and (iv) disclosing or using in an
unauthorized manner any of the Companys confidential or
proprietary information. These restrictive covenants generally
limit the employees competitive activities for a period of
eighteen months to two years following the later of the
expiration or termination of employment under the agreement.
In the event that any of the named executive officers
employment is terminated by the Company for cause,
we are only obligated to pay the executive his salary and
provide the executive with fringe benefits through the date of
termination.
As described above under Employment Agreements and Change
in Control Agreements, certain of our named executive
officers are entitled to receive payments in connection with
their termination by the Company. The following table describes
the estimated present value of payments that would have been due
to the named executive officers in the event that certain
termination events described below had occurred on
January 2, 2010. Such amounts would be payable pursuant to
the terms of their agreements with the Company as described in
the footnotes to the table as well as above under
Employment Agreements and Change in Control
Agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing
|
|
Outplacement
|
|
|
Salary and
|
|
Medical
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Coverage
|
|
Allowance
|
|
Howard S. Cohen(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George R. Judd(2)
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,889
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
H. Douglas Goforth(2)
|
|
$
|
536,250
|
|
|
$
|
15,889
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
Dean A. Adelman(2)
|
|
$
|
472,500
|
|
|
$
|
15,889
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Cohen serves as the Companys non-Executive
Chairman and did not have an employment agreement with the
Company as of January 2, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
The named executive officer would be entitled to these payments
only in the event his employment was terminated either by the
Company without cause or by the named executive officer for good
reason (as such terms are defined in each of the named executive
officers respective employment agreements). |
23
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information about the shares of our
common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options and
other awards under our existing equity compensation plans as of
January 2, 2010. Our shareholder-approved equity
compensation plans are the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and the
2006 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. We do not have any
non-shareholder approved equity compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Options, Warrants
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
and Rights
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
928,315
|
|
|
$
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
1,947,245
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
928,315
|
|
|
$
|
6.34
|
|
|
|
1,947,245
|
|
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION FOR 2009
Shown below is information concerning the compensation for each
member of the Board for 2009. Messrs. Cohen and Judds
compensation is reported above in the 2009 Summary Compensation
Table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
|
|
|
in Cash
|
|
Total
|
Name
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)
|
|
Richard S. Grant(2)
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Richard B. Marchese(3)
|
|
|
97,500
|
|
|
|
97,500
|
|
Charles H. McElrea
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
Steven F. Mayer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan H. Schumacher(4)
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
Mark A. Suwyn(5)
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Robert G. Warden
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Richard Warner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our directors who are neither current employees of the Company
nor current employees or members of Cerberus operations
team, referred to as our outside directors, receive an annual
directors fee of $50,000. In addition, each outside
director receives a fee of $1,250 for each directors
meeting attended. Outside directors also receive a fee of
$20,000 for serving as chairperson of a committee or $10,000 for
being a member of a committee. Directors who are currently
employed by the Company or Cerberus, or who are members of
Cerberus operations team, do not receive additional
consideration for serving as directors, except that all
directors are entitled to reimbursement for travel and
out-of-pocket
expenses in connection with their attendance at board and
committee meetings. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Grant serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the
Board. As of January 2, 2010, Mr. Grant had fully
vested options to purchase 10,000 shares of the
Companys common stock at the exercise price of $11.40 per
share, which was the closing price of the stock on the New York
Stock Exchange on the date preceding the grant. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Marchese serves as a member of the Audit Committee and
the Compensation Committee of the Board. As of January 2,
2010, Mr. Marchese had fully vested options to purchase
10,000 shares of the Companys common stock at the
exercise price of $11.69 per share, which was the closing price
of the stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date
preceding the grant. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Schumacher serves as the Chairman of the Audit
Committee of the Board and as a member of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Suwyn serves as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. |
24
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Messrs. Marchese, Schumacher and Suwyn are the current
members of the Compensation Committee. None of the current
members of the Compensation Committee are current or former
officers or employees of the Company. Mr. Suwyn was
formerly an advisor to Cerberus.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors as
required by and in compliance with the listing standards of the
NYSE. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter which
is posted on the Companys website at
www.bluelinxco.com. The role of the Audit Committee is to
assist the Board in its oversight of the integrity of the
Companys financial reporting process and compliance with
legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee reviews
the Companys financial reporting process on behalf of the
Board. The Companys management is responsible for the
preparation, presentation, and integrity of the Companys
financial statements; accounting and financial reporting
principles; establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures and establishing and maintaining internal control
over financial reporting. The independent registered public
accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent
audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an
opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with
United States generally accepted accounting principles.
The Audit Committee held eleven meetings during the year. The
Audit Committee met with management periodically during the year
to consider the adequacy of the Companys internal controls
and the objectivity of its financial reporting. The Audit
Committee discussed these matters with the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm and with the
appropriate financial personnel. The Audit Committee also met
privately with the independent registered public accounting
firm, which has unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. The
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and
discussed the Companys audited financial statements as of
and for the year ended January 2, 2010, with management and
the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent
registered public accounting firm the matters required to be
discussed under auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States, including those matters set forth in Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (Communication
with Audit Committees), as adopted by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. The independent
registered public accounting firm has provided to the Audit
Committee the written disclosures and the letter required by
applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board regarding the independent accountants
communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence,
and the Audit Committee has also discussed with the independent
registered public accounting firm its independence. The Audit
Committee has concluded that the independent registered public
accounting firm is independent from the Company and its
management.
Based on the reports and discussions described above, the Audit
Committee has recommended to the Board that the Companys
audited financial statements be included in its annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended January 2, 2010, for filing with the SEC.
Respectfully Submitted by:
The Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors:
Alan Schumacher, Chairman
Richard Grant
Richard Marchese
The foregoing report shall not be deemed incorporated by
reference by any general statement incorporating by reference
this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the
extent that we specifically incorporate this information by
reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such
Acts.
25
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review
and Approval or Ratification of Related Person
Transactions
Our law department and Corporate Secretary are primarily
responsible for identifying and reviewing relationships and
transactions in which the Company and our directors, executive
officers, certain of our stockholders or their immediate family
members are participants to determine whether any of these
related persons had or will have a direct or
indirect material interest. In order to identify potential
related person transactions, our law department annually
prepares and distributes to all directors and executive officers
a written questionnaire which includes questions intended to
elicit information about any related person transactions.
Information regarding transactions with related persons or any
violation of policy, including transactions involving a
potential conflict of interest in violation of our Code of
Ethical Conduct, may be anonymously reported by employees
through our Business Conduct and Ethics Hotline.
If a related person transaction is identified by the law
department as one which must be reported in our Proxy Statement
pursuant to applicable SEC regulations, we present the
transaction to the Audit Committee for its review and approval
or ratification. In evaluating related person transactions, our
Audit Committee members apply the same standards of good faith
and fiduciary duty they apply to their general responsibilities
as a committee of the Board and as individual directors. The
Audit Committee may approve a related person transaction when,
in its good faith judgment, the transaction is in the best
interests of the Company.
Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., our equity sponsor, retains
consultants that specialize in operations management and support
and who provide Cerberus with consulting advice concerning
portfolio companies in which funds and accounts managed by
Cerberus or its affiliates have invested. From time to time,
Cerberus makes the services of these consultants available to
Cerberus portfolio companies. We believe that the terms of these
consulting arrangements are favorable to us, or, alternatively,
are materially consistent with those terms that would have been
obtained by us in an arrangement with an unaffiliated third
party. We have normal service, purchase and sales arrangements
with other entities that are owned or controlled by Cerberus. We
believe that these transactions are not material to our results
of operations or financial position.
Other than the transactions discussed above, for the last fiscal
year there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any
transaction, as defined by the SEC:
|
|
|
|
|
to which we are or will be a participant;
|
|
|
|
in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed
$120,000; and
|
|
|
|
in which any related person, as defined by the SEC,
had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
|
Non-Independent
Directors
Seven of the current members of our Board do not meet the
independence standards promulgated under the listing standards
of the NYSE. Five of the current members of our Board are either
current or former employees of or advisors to Cerberus.
Messrs. Mayer and Warden are currently employed by Cerberus
and Messrs. Warner and Cohen are advisors to Cerberus.
Mr. Suwyn was formerly an advisor to Cerberus.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND CODE OF ETHICS
Our corporate governance guidelines, as in effect from time to
time, may be found on our website, www.bluelinxco.com.
Our Board intends to review its corporate governance principles,
committee charters and other aspects of governance as often as
necessary to remain current in all aspects of corporate
governance for similarly situated companies.
Our Board has adopted a policy to self-evaluate its performance
on an annual basis.
Our code of conduct and ethics, applicable to all employees and
officers as well as members of our Board, as in effect from time
to time, may be found on our website, www.bluelinxco.com.
Any amendment to
26
or waiver of our code of conduct and ethics for any Board
member, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer
as well as any other executive officer will be disclosed on our
website, www.bluelinxco.com. Additionally, our
corporate governance guidelines and code of conduct and ethics
are available in print to any stockholder who requests them by
writing to BlueLinx Holdings Inc., attn: Corporate Secretary,
4300 Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339.
Our code of conduct and ethics provides a procedure by which
employees and others may directly or anonymously, through a
secure toll-free phone number, inform our management
and/or the
Audit Committee of any alleged violation of our code of conduct
and ethics, including any allegations of accounting fraud.
Reporting employees are protected from retaliation and any other
form of adverse action.
SUBMISSION
OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
We currently expect to hold our 2011 annual meeting of
stockholders in May 2011. There are two different deadlines for
submitting stockholder proposals for the 2011 meeting. First, if
you wish to have a proposal considered for inclusion in next
years proxy statement, you must submit the proposal in
writing so that we receive it by December 17, 2010.
Proposals should be addressed to our principal executive
offices, BlueLinx Holdings Inc., attn: Corporate Secretary, 4300
Wildwood Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339. If you submit a
proposal, it must comply with applicable laws, including
Rule 14a-8
of the Exchange Act.
In addition, our bylaws provide that any stockholder wishing to
nominate a candidate for director or to propose any other
business at the 2011 annual meeting must give us timely written
notice. This notice must comply with applicable laws and our
bylaws. Copies of our bylaws are available to stockholders free
of charge on request to our principal executive offices,
BlueLinx Holdings Inc., attn: Corporate Secretary, 4300 Wildwood
Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339. To be timely, notice shall be
delivered to our secretary before February 19, 2011, but no
earlier than January 19, 2010; provided, that, in the event
the date of the 2011 annual meeting is more than 30 days
before or more than 70 days after the anniversary date of
the 2010 annual meeting, notice by the stockholder must be
delivered no earlier than 120 days before the 2011 annual
meeting and no later than the later of 90 days before the
2011 annual meeting or 10 days following the day on which
we make public announcement of the date of such meeting. The
public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of an
annual meeting of stockholders shall not commence a new time
period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a
stockholders notice as described above.
DELIVERY
OF PROXY MATERIALS
To reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate proxy materials
to stockholders, we are relying upon SEC rules that permit us to
deliver only one proxy statement and annual report to multiple
stockholders who share an address, unless we receive contrary
instructions from any stockholder at that address. All
stockholders sharing an address will continue to receive
separate proxy cards based on their registered ownership of our
common stock. Any stockholder sharing such an address who does
not receive an individual proxy statement and annual report may
write or call us as specified below and we will promptly send
the materials to the stockholder at no cost. For future
meetings, a stockholder may request separate copies of our proxy
statement and annual report or request that we only send one set
of these materials if the stockholder is receiving multiple
copies, by writing to the Board of Directors, in care of our
Corporate Secretary, BlueLinx Holdings Inc., 4300 Wildwood
Parkway, Atlanta, Georgia 30339, or by telephoning the Company
at
770-953-7000.
27
FORM OF PROXY CARD
BLUELINX HOLDINGS INC.
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
The undersigned appoints Matthew R. Nozemack and H. Douglas Goforth, and each of them, as
proxies, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, and authorizes each of them to
represent and vote, as designated below, all of the shares of stock of BlueLinx Holdings Inc. held
of record by the undersigned on April 2, 2010, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of BlueLinx
Holdings Inc. to be held on May 20, 2010, and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote in favor of Proposal 1 and Proposal 2.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the
undersigned stockholder. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR Proposal 1 and
Proposal 2.
(Continued and to be dated and signed on reverse side)
BLUELINX HOLDINGS INC. 2010 ANNUAL MEETING
1. |
|
Proposal to elect ten directors to hold office until the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. |
|
|
|
Howard S. Cohen |
|
|
|
Richard S. Grant |
|
|
|
George R. Judd |
|
|
|
Richard B. Marchese |
|
|
|
Steven F. Mayer |
|
|
|
Charles H. McElrea |
|
|
|
Alan H. Schumacher |
|
|
|
Mark A. Suwyn |
|
|
|
Robert G. Warden |
|
|
|
M. Richard Warner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
FOR the nominees listed above. |
o |
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for the nominee(s) listed below: |
2. |
|
Proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
o FOR
|
|
o AGAINST
|
|
o ABSTAIN |
3. |
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the meeting. |
Dated:
, 2010
Signature(s) in box
Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing in a fiduciary or representative capacity, give full title as such.