e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30,
2010
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission File Number:
000-53206
Healthcare Trust of America,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
20-4738467
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320,
Scottsdale, Arizona
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
85254
(Zip Code)
|
(480) 998-3478
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since
last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
|
|
o
|
|
|
|
Accelerated filer
|
|
o
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
þ
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
|
o
|
|
|
Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
|
o Yes þ No
|
As of November 11, 2010, there were 191,483,220 shares
of common stock of Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. outstanding.
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
(A Maryland Corporation)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Real estate investments, net
|
|
$
|
1,410,137,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,149,789,000
|
|
Real estate notes receivable, net
|
|
|
56,505,000
|
|
|
|
54,763,000
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
221,186,000
|
|
|
|
219,001,000
|
|
Accounts and other receivables, net
|
|
|
12,590,000
|
|
|
|
10,820,000
|
|
Restricted cash and escrow deposits
|
|
|
24,406,000
|
|
|
|
14,065,000
|
|
Identified intangible assets, net
|
|
|
240,303,000
|
|
|
|
203,222,000
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
31,780,000
|
|
|
|
21,875,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,996,907,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,673,535,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans payable, net
|
|
$
|
594,428,000
|
|
|
$
|
540,028,000
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
41,874,000
|
|
|
|
30,471,000
|
|
Accounts payable due to former affiliates, net (Note 19)
|
|
|
1,007,000
|
|
|
|
4,776,000
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
2,626,000
|
|
|
|
8,625,000
|
|
Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities
|
|
|
9,911,000
|
|
|
|
7,815,000
|
|
Identified intangible liabilities, net
|
|
|
6,107,000
|
|
|
|
6,954,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
655,953,000
|
|
|
|
598,669,000
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest of limited partners
(Note 13)
|
|
|
4,049,000
|
|
|
|
3,549,000
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized; 180,683,141 and 140,590,686 shares issued and
outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively
|
|
|
1,807,000
|
|
|
|
1,405,000
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,601,485,000
|
|
|
|
1,251,996,000
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(266,387,000
|
)
|
|
|
(182,084,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,336,905,000
|
|
|
|
1,071,317,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
1,996,907,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,673,535,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
50,847,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,886,000
|
|
|
$
|
139,640,000
|
|
|
$
|
89,914,000
|
|
Interest income from mortgage notes receivable and other income
|
|
|
1,649,000
|
|
|
|
862,000
|
|
|
|
5,937,000
|
|
|
|
2,128,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
52,496,000
|
|
|
|
31,748,000
|
|
|
|
145,577,000
|
|
|
|
92,042,000
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
|
17,837,000
|
|
|
|
10,494,000
|
|
|
|
47,587,000
|
|
|
|
32,854,000
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,096,000
|
|
|
|
3,979,000
|
|
|
|
12,781,000
|
|
|
|
9,072,000
|
|
Asset management fees to former advisor (Note 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,196,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,783,000
|
|
Acquisition-related expenses (Note 3)
|
|
|
1,019,000
|
|
|
|
5,920,000
|
|
|
|
6,845,000
|
|
|
|
9,100,000
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19,854,000
|
|
|
|
13,287,000
|
|
|
|
55,767,000
|
|
|
|
39,231,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
43,806,000
|
|
|
|
34,876,000
|
|
|
|
122,980,000
|
|
|
|
94,040,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before other income (expense)
|
|
|
8,690,000
|
|
|
|
(3,128,000
|
)
|
|
|
22,597,000
|
|
|
|
(1,998,000
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing
costs and debt discount):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense related to mortgage loan payables, credit
facility, and derivative instruments
|
|
|
(8,480,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,072,000
|
)
|
|
|
(26,471,000
|
)
|
|
|
(22,001,000
|
)
|
Net gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
774,000
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
|
4,571,000
|
|
|
|
3,357,000
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
74,000
|
|
|
|
233,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,008,000
|
|
|
|
(10,074,000
|
)
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
|
|
(20,409,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
of limited partners
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
(241,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
1,133,000
|
|
|
$
|
(10,144,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
831,000
|
|
|
$
|
(20,650,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to controlling
interest on distributed and undistributed earnings
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
166,281,800
|
|
|
|
124,336,078
|
|
|
|
155,480,689
|
|
|
|
105,257,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
166,480,852
|
|
|
|
124,336,078
|
|
|
|
155,679,741
|
|
|
|
105,257,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2008
|
|
|
75,465,437
|
|
|
$
|
755,000
|
|
|
$
|
673,351,000
|
|
|
$
|
(74,786,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
599,320,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
53,276,134
|
|
|
|
533,000
|
|
|
|
530,485,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
531,018,000
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,533,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,533,000
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted common stock
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP
|
|
|
2,807,028
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
26,638,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,666,000
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(791,112
|
)
|
|
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,520,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,528,000
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57,491,000
|
)
|
|
|
(57,491,000
|
)
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(566,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(566,000
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,650,000
|
)
|
|
|
(20,650,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE September 30, 2009
|
|
|
130,857,487
|
|
|
$
|
1,308,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,168,515,000
|
|
|
$
|
(152,927,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,016,896,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2009
|
|
|
140,590,686
|
|
|
$
|
1,405,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,251,996,000
|
|
|
$
|
(182,084,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,071,317,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
38,890,967
|
|
|
|
392,000
|
|
|
|
377,843,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,135,000
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,580,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,580,000
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted common stock
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900,000
|
|
Amortization of share based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879,000
|
|
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP
|
|
|
4,269,072
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
|
40,513,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,556,000
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(3,277,584
|
)
|
|
|
(33,000
|
)
|
|
|
(31,140,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,173,000
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,435,000
|
)
|
|
|
(85,435,000
|
)
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,000
|
)
|
|
|
301,000
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
Net income attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
831,000
|
|
|
|
831,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE September 30, 2010
|
|
|
180,683,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,807,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,601,485,000
|
|
|
$
|
(266,387,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,336,905,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
771,000
|
|
|
$
|
(20,409,000
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (including deferred financing
costs, above/below market leases, debt discount, leasehold
interests, deferred rent receivable, note receivable closing
costs and discount and lease inducements)
|
|
|
51,114,000
|
|
|
|
36,088,000
|
|
Stock based compensation, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
879,000
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
Loss on property insurance settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
|
|
1,097,000
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(4,571,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,357,000
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and other receivables, net
|
|
|
(2,691,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,806,000
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,715,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,202,000
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
9,393,000
|
|
|
|
8,837,000
|
|
Accounts payable due to affiliates, net
|
|
|
(3,769,000
|
)
|
|
|
207,000
|
|
Security deposits, prepaid rent and other liabilities
|
|
|
(167,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,153,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
49,623,000
|
|
|
|
15,968,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of real estate operating properties
|
|
|
(277,980,000
|
)
|
|
|
(241,668,000
|
)
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(13,719,000
|
)
|
|
|
(6,320,000
|
)
|
Restricted cash and escrow deposits
|
|
|
(10,341,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,567,000
|
)
|
Real estate deposits
|
|
|
(2,073,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from insurance settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(304,113,000
|
)
|
|
|
(255,256,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on mortgage loans payable
|
|
|
79,125,000
|
|
|
|
1,696,000
|
|
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(3,900,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on mortgage loans payable and demand note
|
|
|
(83,810,000
|
)
|
|
|
(10,624,000
|
)
|
Derivative financial instruments termination payments
|
|
|
(793,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
380,255,000
|
|
|
|
533,303,000
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(2,328,000
|
)
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
855,000
|
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(31,173,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,528,000
|
)
|
Payment of offering costs
|
|
|
(38,580,000
|
)
|
|
|
(56,382,000
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(42,870,000
|
)
|
|
|
(27,493,000
|
)
|
Distributions to noncontrolling interest limited partner
|
|
|
(106,000
|
)
|
|
|
(290,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
256,675,000
|
|
|
|
432,748,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
2,185,000
|
|
|
|
193,460,000
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
|
|
219,001,000
|
|
|
|
128,331,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
|
$
|
221,186,000
|
|
|
$
|
321,791,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
22,513,000
|
|
|
$
|
19,893,000
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
149,000
|
|
|
$
|
74,000
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
3,813,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,243,000
|
|
The following represents the significant increase in certain
assets and liabilities in connection with our acquisitions of
operating properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans payable, net
|
|
$
|
(45,938,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Security deposits, prepaid rent, and other liabilities
|
|
$
|
13,979,000
|
|
|
$
|
574,000
|
|
Issuance of operating partnership units in connection with
Fannin acquisition
|
|
$
|
1,557,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under the DRIP
|
|
$
|
40,556,000
|
|
|
$
|
26,666,000
|
|
Distributions declared but not paid including stock issued under
the DRIP
|
|
$
|
10,575,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,814,000
|
|
Accrued offering costs
|
|
$
|
730,000
|
|
|
$
|
68,000
|
|
Adjustment to redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
(275,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
566,000
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
As of and for the Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009
The use of the words we, us or
our refers to Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. and
its subsidiaries, including Healthcare Trust of America
Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Description of Business
|
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was
incorporated on April 20, 2006. We were initially
capitalized on April 28, 2006 and consider that our date of
inception.
We are a self-managed, self-advised real estate investment
trust, or REIT. Accordingly, our internal management team
manages our
day-to-day
operations and oversees and supervises our employees and outside
service providers. Acquisitions and asset management services
are performed in-house by our employees, with certain monitored
services provided by third parties at market rates. We do not
pay acquisition, disposition or asset management fees to an
external advisor, and we have not and will not pay any
internalization fees.
We provide stockholders the potential for income and growth
through investment in a diversified portfolio of real estate
properties. We focus primarily on medical office buildings and
healthcare-related facilities. We also invest to a limited
extent in other real estate related assets. However, we do not
presently intend to invest more than 15.0% of our total assets
in such other real estate related assets. We focus primarily on
investments that produce recurring income. We have qualified and
elected to be taxed as a REIT, for federal income tax purposes
and we intend to continue to be taxed as a REIT. We conduct
substantially all of our operations through Healthcare Trust of
America Holdings, LP, or our operating partnership.
As of September 30, 2010, we had made 70 acquisitions
comprising approximately 8,943,000 square feet of gross
leasable area, or GLA, which includes 208 buildings and two real
estate related assets. Additionally, we purchased the remaining
20% interest that we previously did not own in HTA-Duke
Chesterfield Rehab, LLC, or the JV Company that owns the
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center. The aggregate purchase price
of these acquisitions was $1,803,056,000. As of
September 30, 2010, the average occupancy of these
properties was approximately 91%.
On September 20, 2006, we commenced a best efforts initial
public offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered up
to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per
share and up to 21,052,632 shares of our common stock
pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, at
$9.50 per share, aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. As of
March 19, 2010, the date upon which our initial offering
terminated, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our
initial offering for 147,562,354 shares of our common
stock, or $1,474,062,000, excluding shares of our common stock
issued under the DRIP.
On March 19, 2010, we commenced a best efforts public
offering, or our follow-on offering, in which we are offering up
to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per
share in our primary offering and up to 21,052,632 shares
of our common stock offered for sale pursuant to the DRIP at
$9.50 per share, aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. As of
September 30, 2010, we have received and accepted
subscriptions in our follow-on offering for
28,283,902 shares of our common stock, or $282,635,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
On August 16, 2010, we announced our intention to close our
follow-on offering early, subject to market conditions, on or
before April 30, 2011 but not earlier than
November 30, 2010, with
30-day prior
notice. Our follow-on offering is currently scheduled to expire
on March 19, 2012, unless extended. We will not terminate
our follow-on offering early unless and until we determine that
an early termination is in the best interests of our
stockholders and market conditions are favorable.
Realty Capital Securities, LLC, or RCS, an unaffiliated third
party, serves as the dealer manager for our
follow-on
offering. RCS is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, or the SEC, and with all
6
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
50 states and is a member of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, or FINRA. RCS offers our shares of common
stock for sale through a network of broker-dealers and their
licensed registered representatives.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The summary of significant accounting policies presented below
is designed to assist in understanding our interim condensed
consolidated financial statements. Such interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
thereto are the representations of our management, who are
responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These
accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, in all
material respects, and have been consistently applied in
preparing our accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Basis
of Presentation
Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements include our accounts and those of our operating
partnership, the wholly-owned subsidiaries of our operating
partnership and any variable interest entities, or VIEs, as
defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the
FASB, Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 810,
Consolidation, or ASC 810. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
the consolidated financial statements. We operate in an umbrella
partnership REIT, or UPREIT, structure in which wholly-owned
subsidiaries of our operating partnership own all of the
properties acquired on our behalf. We are the sole general
partner of our operating partnership and as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we owned an
approximately 99.89% and an approximately 99.99%, respectively,
general partner interest in our operating partnership.
Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, or our
former advisor, was a limited partner of our operating
partnership as of September 30, 2010, and as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, owned an
approximately 0.01% limited partner interest in our operating
partnership. See Note 19, Subsequent Events, for
information regarding redemption of this limited partner
interest held by our former advisor. Additionally, as of
September 30, 2010, approximately 0.10% of our operating
partnership is owned by certain physician investors who obtained
limited partner interests in connection with the Fannin
acquisition (see Note 13).
Because we are the sole general partner of our operating
partnership and have unilateral control over its management and
major operating decisions (even if additional limited partners
are admitted to our operating partnership), the accounts of our
operating partnership are consolidated in our consolidated
financial statements.
Certain amounts presented in the interim condensed consolidated
statements of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 have been reclassified to conform to the
presentation for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. In our previously issued statement of
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
asset management fees of $1,196,000 and acquisition-related
expenses of $5,920,000 were included within general and
administrative expenses of $11,095,000. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, asset management fees of
$3,783,000 and acquisition-related expenses of $9,100,000 were
included within general and administrative expenses of
$21,955,000.
Our interim condensed consolidated statement of operations for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 depicts a
reclassification of approximately $1,010,000 from Rental
Expenses into General and Administrative Expenses, the entirety
of which pertains to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
This reclassification was done to conform with the presentation
depicted within our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the SEC
on March 16, 2010 (the 2009 Annual Report).
7
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Interim
Unaudited Financial Data
Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in
conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain
information and footnote disclosures required for annual
financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to
SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. Our accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which
are, in our opinion, of a normal recurring nature and necessary
for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year; such results may be
less favorable. Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in the 2009 Annual Report.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments
with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.
Segment
Disclosure
ASC 280, Segment Reporting, or ASC 280, establishes
standards for reporting financial and descriptive information
about an enterprises reportable segments. We have
determined that we have one reportable segment, with activities
related to investing in medical office buildings,
healthcare-related facilities,
healthcare-related
office properties and other real estate related assets. Our
investments in real estate and other real estate related assets
are geographically diversified and our chief operating decision
maker evaluates operating performance on an individual asset
level. As each of our assets has similar economic
characteristics, tenants, and products and services, our assets
have been aggregated into one reportable segment.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Below are the recently issued accounting pronouncements and our
evaluation of the impact of such pronouncements.
Consolidation
Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R) codified primarily in
ASC 810-10,
Consolidation Overall, or
ASC 810-10,
which modifies how a company determines when an entity that is a
VIE should be consolidated. This guidance clarifies that the
determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an
entity is based on, among other things, an entitys purpose
and design and a companys ability to direct the activities
of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys
economic performance. It also requires an ongoing reassessment
of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, and it
requires additional disclosures about a companys
involvement in VIEs and any significant changes in risk exposure
due to that involvement. This guidance became effective for us
on January 1, 2010. The adoption of
ASC 810-10
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
8
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Fair
Value Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-06,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), or
ASU 2010-06,
which provides amendments to Subtopic
820-10 that
require new disclosures and that clarify existing disclosures in
order to increase transparency in financial reporting with
regard to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.
ASU 2010-06
requires new disclosures with respect to the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and the reasons for those
transfers, as well as separate presentation about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3). In addition, ASU
2010-06
provides amendments that clarify existing disclosures, requiring
a reporting entity to provide fair value measurement disclosures
for each class of assets and liabilities as well as disclosures
about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value
measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.
Finally, ASU
2010-06
amends guidance on employers disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets under ASC 715 to require
that disclosures be provided by classes of assets instead of by
major categories of assets. ASU
2010-06 is
effective for the interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward
of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010. Accordingly, ASU
2010-06
became effective for us on January 1, 2010 (except for the
Level 3 activity disclosures, which will become effective
for us on January 1, 2011). The adoption of ASU
2010-06 has
not had a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Equity
Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-01,
Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components
of Stock and Cash, or ASU
2010-01, the
objective of which was to address the diversity in practice
related to the accounting for a distribution to shareholders
that offers them the ability to elect to receive their entire
distribution in cash or shares of equivalent value with a
potential limitation on the total amount of cash that
shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate. ASU
2010-01
clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to
shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or shares
with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all
shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered
a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share (EPS)
prospectively. ASU
2010-01
became effective for us January 1, 2010. The adoption of
ASU 2010-01
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Credit
Risk Pronouncements
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-20,
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables
and the Allowance for Credit Losses, or ASU
2010-20,
which requires disclosures about the nature of the credit risk
in an entitys financing receivables, how that risk is
incorporated into the allowance for credit losses, and the
reasons for any changes in the allowance. Disclosure is required
to be disaggregated, primarily at the level at which an entity
calculates its allowance for credit losses. The specific
required disclosures are a rollforward schedule of the allowance
for credit losses for the reporting period, the related
investment in financing receivables, the nonaccrual status of
financing receivables, impaired financing receivables, credit
quality indicators, the aging of past due financing receivables,
any troubled debt restructurings and their effect on the
allowance for credit losses, the extent of any financing
receivables modified by troubled debt restructuring that have
defaulted and their impact on the allowance for credit losses,
and significant sales or purchases of financing receivables. The
ASU 2010-20
disclosure requirements primarily pertain to our mortgage notes
receivables and are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending on or after December 15, 2010.
9
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Real
Estate Investments
|
Our investments in our consolidated properties consisted of the
following as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
137,060,000
|
|
|
$
|
122,972,000
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
1,364,708,000
|
|
|
|
1,083,496,000
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501,778,000
|
|
|
|
1,206,478,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(91,641,000
|
)
|
|
|
(56,689,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,410,137,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,149,789,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $12,552,000 and $8,186,000,
respectively, and depreciation expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $34,985,000 and
$23,407,000, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we
completed 17 new acquisitions as well as purchased three
additional medical office buildings within existing portfolios.
Additionally, we purchased the remaining 20.0% interest that we
previously did not own in HTA-Duke Chesterfield Rehab, LLC, the
JV Company that owns Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center. The
aggregate purchase price of these assets was $342,745,000.
Acquisitions completed during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Property
|
|
Property Location
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Payable(1)
|
|
|
Camp Creek
|
|
Atlanta, GA
|
|
3/02/10
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,550,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
King Street
|
|
Jacksonville, FL
|
|
3/09/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,775,000
|
|
|
|
6,602,000
|
|
Sugarland
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
3/23/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
12,400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deaconess
|
|
Evansville, IN
|
|
3/23/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
45,257,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center(2)
|
|
Chesterfield, MO
|
|
3/24/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3,900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pearland Cullen
|
|
Pearland, TX
|
|
3/31/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
6,775,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hilton Head Heritage
|
|
Hilton Head, SC
|
|
3/31/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,058,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triad Technology Center
|
|
Baltimore, MD
|
|
3/31/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
29,250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mt. Pleasant (E. Cooper)
|
|
Mount Pleasant, SC
|
|
3/31/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,925,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal North
|
|
Pittsburgh, PA
|
|
4/29/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
40,472,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balfour Concord Portfolio
|
|
Lewisville, TX
|
|
6/25/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4,800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cannon Park Place
|
|
Charleston, SC
|
|
6/28/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,446,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
7900 Fannin(3)
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
38,100,000
|
|
|
|
22,687,000
|
|
Balfour Concord Portfolio(4)
|
|
Denton, TX
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,700,000
|
|
|
|
4,657,000
|
|
Pearland Broadway(4)
|
|
Pearland, TX
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3,701,000
|
|
|
|
2,381,000
|
|
Overlook
|
|
Stockbridge, GA
|
|
7/15/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
8,140,000
|
|
|
|
5,440,000
|
|
Sierra Vista
|
|
San Luis Obispo, CA
|
|
8/04/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
10,950,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hilton Head Moss Creek(4)
|
|
Hilton Head, SC
|
|
8/12/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2,652,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando Portfolio
|
|
Orlando & Oviedo, FL
|
|
9/29/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
18,300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Fe Portfolio
|
|
Santa Fe, NM
|
|
9/30/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
9,560,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rendina Portfolio
|
|
Las Vegas, NV and
|
|
9/30/10
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
41,034,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poughkeepsie, NY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
342,745,000
|
|
|
$
|
41,767,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the amount of the mortgage loan payable assumed or
newly placed on the property in connection with the acquisition
or secured by the property subsequent to acquisition. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents our purchase of the remaining 20% interest we
previously did not own in the JV Company that owns Chesterfield
Rehabilitation Center. See Note 13, Redeemable
Noncontrolling Interest of Limited Partners, and Note 16,
Business Combinations, for further information regarding this
purchase. |
10
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents our purchase of the majority interest in the Fannin
partnership, which owns the 7900 Fannin medical office building,
the value of which is approximately $38,100,000. We acquired
both the general partner interest and the majority of the
limited partner interests in the Fannin partnership. The
transaction provided the original physician investors with the
right to remain in the Fannin partnership, to receive limited
partnership units in our operating partnership, and/or receive
cash. Ten investors elected to remain in the Fannin partnership,
which represents a 16% noncontrolling interest in the property. |
|
(4) |
|
Represent purchases of additional medical office buildings
within portfolios we had previously acquired during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. |
|
|
4.
|
Real
Estate Notes Receivable, Net
|
Real estate notes receivable, net consisted of the following as
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Property
|
|
Property Type
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
MacNeal Hospital Medical Office Building
Berwyn, Illinois
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.95
|
%(1)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
|
MacNeal Hospital Medical Office Building
Berwyn, Illinois
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.95
|
(1)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
|
7,500,000
|
|
St. Lukes Medical Office Building
Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.85
|
(2)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
|
|
3,750,000
|
|
St. Lukes Medical Office Building
Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.85
|
(2)
|
|
11/01/11
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
|
|
1,250,000
|
|
Rush Presbyterian Medical Office Building
Oak Park, Illinois
|
|
Medical Office Building
|
|
|
7.76
|
(3)
|
|
12/01/14
|
|
|
41,150,000
|
|
|
|
41,150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,150,000
|
|
|
|
61,150,000
|
|
Add: Notes receivable closing costs, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
788,000
|
|
Less: discount, net(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,245,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,175,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate notes receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,505,000
|
|
|
$
|
54,763,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The effective interest rate associated with these notes as of
September 30, 2010 is 7.93%. |
|
(2) |
|
The effective interest rate associated with these notes as of
September 30, 2010 is 7.80%. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents an average interest rate for the life of the note
with an effective interest rate of 8.6%. |
|
(4) |
|
The discount is amortized on a straight-line basis over the
respective life of each note. |
11
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Identified
Intangible Assets, Net
|
Identified intangible assets consisted of the following as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
In place leases, net of accumulated amortization of $38,476,000
and $25,452,000 as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively (with a weighted average
remaining life of 94 months and 95 months as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
$
|
93,816,000
|
|
|
$
|
80,577,000
|
|
Above market leases, net of accumulated amortization of
$5,287,000 and $3,233,000 as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively (with a weighted average
remaining life of 85 months and 87 months as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
15,765,000
|
|
|
|
11,831,000
|
|
Tenant relationships, net of accumulated amortization of
$20,853,000 and $13,598,000 as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively (with a weighted average
remaining life of 150 months and 150 months as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
107,537,000
|
|
|
|
89,610,000
|
|
Leasehold interests, net of accumulated amortization of $322,000
and $103,000 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively (with a weighted average remaining life of
871 months and 899 months as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
23,185,000
|
|
|
|
21,204,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
240,303,000
|
|
|
$
|
203,222,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense recorded on the identified intangible
assets for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was $7,915,000 and $5,477,000, respectively, which included
$735,000 and $497,000, respectively, of amortization recorded
against rental income for above market leases and $73,000 and
$15,000, respectively, of amortization charged to rental
expenses for leasehold interests in our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated statements of operations. Amortization
expense recorded on the identified intangible assets for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$22,547,000 and $17,080,000, respectively, which included
$2,054,000 and $1,459,000, respectively, of amortization
recorded against rental income for above market leases and
$220,000 and $43,000, respectively, of amortization recorded
against rental expenses for leasehold interests in our
accompanying interim condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
12
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Other assets, net, consisted of the following as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of
$4,705,000 and $3,346,000 as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively
|
|
$
|
3,780,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,281,000
|
|
Lease commissions, net of accumulated amortization of $936,000
and $427,000 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively
|
|
|
4,036,000
|
|
|
|
3,061,000
|
|
Lease inducements, net of accumulated amortization of $467,000
and $280,000 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively
|
|
|
1,345,000
|
|
|
|
1,215,000
|
|
Deferred rent receivable
|
|
|
15,598,000
|
|
|
|
9,380,000
|
|
Prepaid expenses, deposits and other
|
|
|
7,021,000
|
|
|
|
4,938,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,780,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,875,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization and depreciation expense recorded on deferred
financing costs, lease commissions, lease inducements and other
assets for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was $679,000 and $642,000, respectively, of which $424,000
and $469,000, respectively, of amortization was recorded against
interest expense for deferred financing costs and $60,000 and
$36,000, respectively, of amortization was recorded against
rental income for lease inducements in our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated statements of operations. Amortization
and depreciation expense recorded on deferred financing costs,
lease commissions, lease inducements and other assets for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$2,063,000 and $1,733,000, respectively, of which $1,366,000 and
$1,402,000, respectively, of amortization was recorded against
interest expense for deferred financing costs and $188,000 and
$85,000, respectively, of amortization was recorded against
rental income for lease inducements in our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
7.
|
Mortgage
Loans Payable, Net
|
Mortgage loans payable were $592,344,000 ($594,428,000,
including premium) and $542,462,000 ($540,028,000, net of
discount) as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, we had fixed
and variable rate mortgage loans with effective interest rates
ranging from 1.66% to 12.75% per annum and a weighted average
effective interest rate of 4.50% per annum. As of
September 30, 2010, we had $328,532,000 ($330,616,000,
including premium) of fixed rate debt, or 55.5% of mortgage
loans payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.05% per
annum, and $263,812,000 of variable rate debt, or 44.5% of
mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average interest rate of
2.57% per annum. As of December 31, 2009, we had fixed and
variable rate mortgage loans with effective interest rates
ranging from 1.58% to 12.75% per annum and a weighted average
effective interest rate of 3.94% per annum. As of
December 31, 2009, we had $209,858,000
($207,424,000 net of discount) of fixed rate debt, or 38.7%
of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average interest rate
of 5.99% per annum, and $332,604,000 of variable rate debt, or
61.3% of mortgage loans payable, at a weighted average interest
rate of 2.65% per annum. All of our mortgage loans payable were
collateralized by their associated investment properties at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
We are required by the terms of the applicable loan documents to
meet certain financial covenants, such as debt service coverage
ratios, rent coverage ratios and reporting requirements. As of
December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all such
covenants and requirements on $457,262,000 of our mortgage loans
payable and were making appropriate adjustments to comply with
such covenants on $85,200,000 of our mortgage loans payable by
depositing $22,676,000 into a restricted collateral account. As
of September 30, 2010, we believe that we were in
compliance with all such covenants and requirements on
$534,344,000 of our mortgage loans payable. We have reduced the
amount deposited within our restricted collateral account to
$12,036,000 as of September 30, 2010, and we are currently
working with lenders in order to comply with certain covenants
on the remaining $58,000,000 balance of our mortgage loans
payable.
13
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Mortgage loans payable consisted of the following as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
September 30, 2010(a)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009(b)
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southpointe Office Parke and Epler Parke I
|
|
|
6.11
|
%
|
|
|
09/01/16
|
|
|
$
|
9,146,000
|
|
|
$
|
9,146,000
|
|
Crawfordsville Medical Office Park and Athens
Surgery Center
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
|
|
10/01/16
|
|
|
|
4,264,000
|
|
|
|
4,264,000
|
|
The Gallery Professional Building
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
03/01/17
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
Lenox Office Park, Building G
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
02/01/17
|
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
Commons V Medical Office Building
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
06/11/17
|
|
|
|
9,708,000
|
|
|
|
9,809,000
|
|
Yorktown Medical Center and Shakerag Medical Center
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
|
|
05/11/17
|
|
|
|
13,477,000
|
|
|
|
13,530,000
|
|
Thunderbird Medical Plaza
|
|
|
5.67
|
|
|
|
06/11/17
|
|
|
|
13,786,000
|
|
|
|
13,917,000
|
|
Gwinnett Professional Center
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
01/01/14
|
|
|
|
5,443,000
|
|
|
|
5,509,000
|
|
Northmeadow Medical Center
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
12/01/14
|
|
|
|
7,586,000
|
|
|
|
7,706,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 2
|
|
|
5.91
|
|
|
|
07/01/13
|
|
|
|
14,075,000
|
|
|
|
14,222,000
|
|
Renaissance Medical Centre
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
|
|
09/01/15
|
|
|
|
18,548,000
|
|
|
|
18,767,000
|
|
Renaissance Medical Centre
|
|
|
12.75
|
|
|
|
09/01/15
|
|
|
|
1,241,000
|
|
|
|
1,242,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 4
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
06/01/19
|
|
|
|
6,441,000
|
|
|
|
6,586,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 4
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
|
|
06/01/19
|
|
|
|
1,649,000
|
|
|
|
1,684,000
|
|
Marietta Health Park
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
|
11/01/15
|
|
|
|
7,200,000
|
|
|
|
7,200,000
|
|
Hampden Place
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
01/01/12
|
|
|
|
8,611,000
|
|
|
|
8,785,000
|
|
Greenville Patewood
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
|
|
01/01/16
|
|
|
|
35,718,000
|
|
|
|
36,000,000
|
|
Greenville Greer
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
02/01/17
|
|
|
|
8,440,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenville Memorial
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
02/01/17
|
|
|
|
4,468,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenville MMC
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
06/01/20
|
|
|
|
22,810,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sun City-Note B
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
|
|
09/01/14
|
|
|
|
14,852,000
|
|
|
|
14,997,000
|
|
Sun City-Note C
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
|
09/01/14
|
|
|
|
4,430,000
|
|
|
|
4,509,000
|
|
Sun City Note D
|
|
|
6.98
|
|
|
|
09/01/14
|
|
|
|
13,865,000
|
|
|
|
13,985,000
|
|
King Street
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
|
03/05/17
|
|
|
|
6,487,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin MOB II Mequon
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
07/10/17
|
|
|
|
9,981,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balfour Concord Denton
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
|
|
08/10/12
|
|
|
|
4,624,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pearland-Broadway
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
09/01/12
|
|
|
|
2,371,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
7900 Fannin-Note A
|
|
|
7.30
|
|
|
|
01/01/21
|
|
|
|
21,835,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
7900 Fannin-Note B
|
|
|
7.68
|
|
|
|
01/01/16
|
|
|
|
821,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deaconess Evansville
|
|
|
4.90
|
|
|
|
08/06/15
|
|
|
|
21,227,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overlook
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
11/05/16
|
|
|
|
5,428,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triad
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
09/01/22
|
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed rate debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,532,000
|
|
|
|
209,858,000
|
|
Variable Rate Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Care Portfolio 1
|
|
|
4.75
|
%(c)
|
|
|
03/31/10
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
24,800,000
|
|
1 and 4 Market Exchange
|
|
|
1.61
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/30/10
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
14,500,000
|
|
East Florida Senior Care Portfolio
|
|
|
1.66
|
(c)
|
|
|
10/01/10
|
|
|
|
29,101,000
|
|
|
|
29,451,000
|
|
Kokomo Medical Office Park
|
|
|
1.66
|
(c)
|
|
|
11/30/10
|
|
|
|
8,300,000
|
|
|
|
8,300,000
|
|
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center
|
|
|
1.91
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/30/10
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
Park Place Office Park
|
|
|
1.81
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
|
10,943,000
|
|
|
|
10,943,000
|
|
Highlands Ranch Medical Plaza
|
|
|
1.81
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
|
8,853,000
|
|
|
|
8,853,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 1
|
|
|
1.94
|
(c)
|
|
|
02/28/11
|
|
|
|
19,800,000
|
|
|
|
20,460,000
|
|
Fort Road Medical Building
|
|
|
1.91
|
(c)
|
|
|
03/06/11
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
5,800,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 3
|
|
|
2.51
|
(c)
|
|
|
06/26/11
|
|
|
|
58,000,000
|
|
|
|
58,000,000
|
|
SouthCrest Medical Plaza
|
|
|
2.46
|
(c)
|
|
|
06/30/11
|
|
|
|
12,870,000
|
|
|
|
12,870,000
|
|
Wachovia Pool Loans(d)
|
|
|
4.65
|
(c)
|
|
|
06/30/11
|
|
|
|
48,947,000
|
|
|
|
49,696,000
|
|
Cypress Station Medical Office Building
|
|
|
2.01
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/01/11
|
|
|
|
7,067,000
|
|
|
|
7,131,000
|
|
Medical Portfolio 4
|
|
|
2.41
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/24/11
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
21,400,000
|
|
Decatur Medical Plaza
|
|
|
2.26
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/26/11
|
|
|
|
7,900,000
|
|
|
|
7,900,000
|
|
Mountain Empire Portfolio
|
|
|
2.36
|
(c)
|
|
|
09/28/11
|
|
|
|
18,527,000
|
|
|
|
18,882,000
|
|
Sun City-Sun 1
|
|
|
1.76
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
Sun City-Sun 2
|
|
|
1.76
|
(c)
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
|
|
9,504,000
|
|
|
|
9,618,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total variable rate debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,812,000
|
|
|
|
332,604,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed and variable debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592,344,000
|
|
|
|
542,462,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Net premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,084,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,434,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans payable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
594,428,000
|
|
|
$
|
540,028,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As of September 30, 2010, we had variable rate mortgage
loans on 17 of our properties with effective interest rates
ranging from 1.66% to 4.65% per annum and a weighted average
effective interest rate of 2.57% per annum. However, as of
September 30, 2010, we had fixed rate interest rate swaps,
ranging from 4.70% to 6.02%, on our variable rate mortgage loans
payable on 8 of our properties, thereby effectively fixing our
interest rate on those mortgage loans payable. |
|
(b) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, we had variable rate mortgage
loans on 22 of our properties with effective interest rates
ranging from 1.58% to 4.75% per annum and a weighted average
effective interest rate of 2.65% per annum. However, as of
December 31, 2009, we had fixed rate interest rate swaps,
ranging from 4.51% to 6.02%, on our variable rate mortgage loans
payable on 20 of our properties, thereby effectively fixing our
interest rate on those mortgage loans payable. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents the interest rate in effect as of September 30,
2010. |
|
(d) |
|
We have a mortgage loan in the principal amount of $48,947,000
and $49,696,000, as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively, secured by Epler Parke
Building B, 5995 Plaza Drive, Nutfield Professional Center,
Medical Portfolio 2 and Academy Medical Center. |
|
(e) |
|
Represent loan balances that we have paid off during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. |
The principal payments due on our mortgage loans payable as of
September 30, 2010 for the three months ending
December 31, 2010 and for each of the next four years
ending December 31 and thereafter, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
81,051,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
177,879,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
20,703,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
19,300,000
|
|
2014
|
|
|
47,939,000
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
245,472,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
592,344,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above does not reflect all available extension
options. Of the amounts maturing in 2010, $39,153,000 have two
one-year extensions available and $29,101,000 have a one-year
extension available. Of the amounts maturing in 2011,
$153,310,000 have two one-year extensions available.
See Note 19, Subsequent Events, for information concerning
our $135,000,000 secured term loan financing commitment, subject
to certain customary conditions to closing, with Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. We obtained this commitment, which serves to
refinance $17,200,000 of debt maturing in 2010 and approximately
$82,000,000 of debt maturing in 2011, on November 3, 2010.
Additionally, see Note 19, Subsequent Events, for
information regarding $29,101,000 of debt that was paid off upon
its reaching maturity on October 1, 2010 as well as our
receipt of a one-year extension on $22,000,000 of our debt that
was originally scheduled to mature on December 30, 2010.
|
|
8.
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or ASC 815,
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded
in other contracts, and for hedging activities. We utilize
derivatives such as fixed interest rate swaps and interest rate
caps to add stability to interest expense and to manage our
exposure to interest rate movements. Consistent with
ASC 815, we record derivative financial instruments on our
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as either an asset or a
liability measured at fair value. ASC 815 permits special
hedge accounting if certain requirements are met. Hedge
accounting allows for gains and losses on derivatives designated
as hedges to be offset by the change in value of the hedged
item(s) or to be deferred in other comprehensive income. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no
derivatives
15
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
were designated as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges.
Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are
used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements, but do
not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements of
ASC 815. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial
instruments and payments/receipts on such instruments are
recorded in gain on derivative financial instruments in our
accompanying interim condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, six of our
interest rate swap derivative instruments with an aggregate
notional amount of $167,783,000 reached maturity and two of our
interest rate swap derivative instruments with an aggregate
notional amount of $27,200,000 were terminated early in
conjunction with our prepayment of certain loan balances.
The following table lists the derivative financial instruments
held by us as of September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Instrument
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
$
|
8,300,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
$
|
(87,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
11/30/10
|
|
|
8,853,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
|
|
(110,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
10,943,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
|
|
(135,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
(235,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/30/10
|
|
|
29,101,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
6.02
|
|
|
|
(74,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
10/01/10
|
|
|
19,727,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
(271,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
01/31/11
|
|
|
7,900,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
(239,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/26/11
|
|
|
16,993,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
(1,475,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/28/13
|
|
|
9,618,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
Cap
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
The following table lists the derivative financial instruments
held by us as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Instrument
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
$
|
14,500,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
(505,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/28/10
|
|
|
8,300,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
|
(327,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
11/30/10
|
|
|
8,853,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
|
|
(326,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
10,943,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.52
|
|
|
|
(403,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/31/10
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
(759,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
12/30/10
|
|
|
29,101,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
6.02
|
|
|
|
(998,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
10/01/10
|
|
|
22,000,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
(688,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
01/31/11
|
|
|
5,800,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
(173,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
03/06/11
|
|
|
7,292,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
(75,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
05/03/10
|
|
|
24,800,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
4.85
|
|
|
|
(206,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
03/31/10
|
|
|
50,321,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
(922,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
06/30/10
|
|
|
12,870,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
|
(236,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
06/30/10
|
|
|
58,000,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.59
|
|
|
|
(1,016,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
06/26/10
|
|
|
21,400,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
(782,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/23/11
|
|
|
7,900,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
(296,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/26/11
|
|
|
17,304,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
(913,000
|
)
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
09/28/13
|
|
|
9,618,000
|
|
|
LIBOR
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
890,000
|
|
|
Cap
|
|
|
12/31/14
|
|
|
54,000,000
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,051,000
|
|
|
Participation
Interest(a)
|
|
|
12/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we reevaluated
a feature within the Rush Presbyterian Note Receivable which had
been disclosed in the 2009 Annual Report as a derivative
financial instrument. Based on this reevaluation, we determined
that this feature, by its nature, qualifies for a scope
exception under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging,
and thus may be excluded from classification as a derivative
financial instrument. As such, we have prospectively corrected
our fair value and derivative instrument disclosures with
respect to this feature. |
16
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
fair value of our derivative financial instruments was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
Derivatives not designated as
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
hedging instruments:
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$
|
2,626,000
|
|
|
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
|
|
$
|
8,625,000
|
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
255,000
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
$
|
890,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, our derivative financial instruments had the following
effect on our condensed consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
Recognized
|
Derivatives not designated as
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
hedging instruments under:
|
|
Recognized
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
966,000
|
|
|
$
|
66,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,206,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,357,000
|
|
Interest Rate Cap
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
(192,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(635,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have agreements with each of our interest rate swap
derivative counterparties that contain a provision whereby if we
default on certain of our unsecured indebtedness, then we could
also be declared in default on our interest rate swap derivative
obligations resulting in an acceleration of payment. In
addition, we are exposed to credit risk in the event of
non-performance by our derivative counterparties. We believe we
mitigate our credit risk by entering into agreements with
credit-worthy counterparties. We record counterparty credit risk
valuation adjustments on interest rate swap derivative assets in
order to properly reflect the credit quality of the
counterparty. In addition, our fair value of interest rate swap
derivative liabilities is adjusted to reflect the impact of our
credit quality. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, there have been no termination events or
events of default related to the interest rate swaps.
|
|
9.
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
On September 10, 2007, we entered into a loan agreement, or
the Loan Agreement, in which we had a secured revolving credit
facility in an aggregate maximum principal amount of
$50,000,000. A modification to this agreement executed
December 12, 2007, increased the aggregate maximum
principal amount to $80,000,000. We voluntarily closed this
credit facility on August 19, 2010. We did not borrow on
this credit facility during 2009 or during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. See Note 19, Subsequent Events,
for discussion of our new $200,000,000 unsecured credit facility
obtained on October 13, 2010.
The Loan Agreement contained various affirmative and negative
covenants, which are customary for facilities and transactions
of this type. Such covenants included limitations on the
incurrence of debt by us and our subsidiaries, which own
properties that serve as collateral for the Loan Agreement,
limitations on the nature of our business, and limitations on
our subsidiaries that own properties that serve as collateral
for the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement also imposed the
following financial covenants on us and our operating
partnership, as applicable: (1) a minimum ratio of
operating cash flow to interest expense, (2) a maximum
ratio of liabilities to asset value, (3) a maximum
distribution covenant and (4) a minimum net worth covenant,
all of which were defined in the Loan Agreement. In addition,
the Loan Agreement included events of default that are customary
for facilities and transactions of this type. As of
August 19, 2010, the date of this credit facilitys
closure, and December 31, 2009, we were in compliance with
all such covenants and requirements.
17
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Identified
Intangible Liabilities, Net
|
Identified intangible liabilities consisted of the following as
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Below market leases, net of accumulated amortization of
$4,309,000 and $3,033,000 as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively (with a weighted average
remaining life of 104 months and 94 months as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
$
|
6,107,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,954,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,107,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,954,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization recorded on the identified intangible liabilities
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$409,000 and $437,000, respectively. Amortization recorded on
the identified intangible liabilities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $1,276,000 and $1,380,000,
respectively. Amortization on the identified intangible
liabilities is recorded in rental income in our accompanying
interim condensed consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Litigation
We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to
our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us,
which if determined unfavorably to us, would have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Environmental
Matters
We follow the policy of monitoring our properties for the
presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no
assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist
at our properties, we are not currently aware of any
environmental liability with respect to our properties that
would have a material effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows. Further, we are
not aware of any environmental liability or any unasserted claim
or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we
believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of
a loss contingency.
Other
Organizational and Offering Expenses
As a self-managed company, we are responsible for all of our
current and future organizational and offering expenses,
including those incurred in connection with our follow-on
offering. These other organization and offering expenses include
all expenses (other than selling commissions and dealer manager
fees, which generally represent 7.0% and 3.0% of our gross
offering proceeds, respectively) to be paid by us in connection
with our follow-on offering.
Other
Our other commitments and contingencies include the usual
obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal
course of business. In our opinion, these matters are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
18
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Transition:
Self-Management
Upon the effectiveness of our initial offering on
September 20, 2006, we entered into the Advisory Agreement
with our former advisor, and Grubb & Ellis Realty
Investors, LLC, or GERI, and a dealer manager agreement with
Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc., our former dealer
manager. These agreements entitled our former advisor, our
former dealer manager and their affiliates to specified
compensation for certain services as well as reimbursement of
certain expenses.
In 2008, we announced that we were going to transition to become
a self-managed company. As part of our transition to self
management, on November 14, 2008, we amended and restated
the Advisory Agreement effective as of October 24, 2008, to
reduce acquisition and asset management fees, eliminate the need
to pay disposition or internalization fees, to set the framework
for our transition to self-management and to create an
enterprise value for our company. On November 14, 2008, we
also amended the partnership agreement for our operating
partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement
as amended, our former advisor had the ability to elect to defer
its right, if applicable, to receive a subordinated distribution
from our operating partnership after the termination or
expiration of the advisory agreement upon certain liquidity
events if specified stockholder return thresholds were met. This
right was subject to a number of conditions and had been the
subject of dispute between the parties, as well as monetary and
other claims.
On May 21, 2009, we provided notice to Grubb &
Ellis Securities that we would proceed with a dealer manager
transition pursuant to which Grubb & Ellis Securities
ceased to serve as our dealer manager for our initial offering
at the end of the day on August 28, 2009. Commencing
August 29, 2009, RCS, an unaffiliated third party, assumed
the role of dealer manager for the remainder of the offering
period. The Advisory Agreement expired in accordance with its
terms on September 20, 2009.
Recently, on October 18, 2010, we and our former advisor
and certain of its affiliates entered into a redemption,
termination and release agreement, or the
Redemption Agreement. Pursuant to the
Redemption Agreement, we purchased the limited partner
interest, including all rights with respect to a subordinated
distribution upon the occurrence of specified liquidity events
and other rights held by our former advisor in our operating
partnership, for $8,000,000. In addition, pursuant to the
Redemption Agreement the parties resolved all monetary
claims and other matters between them, and entered into certain
mutual and other releases of the parties. We believe that the
execution of the Redemption Agreement represents the final
stage of our successful transition from Grubb & Ellis
and that the Redemption Agreement further positions us to
take advantage of potential strategic opportunities in the
future.
Former
Executive Officers
Two of our former executive officers, Andrea Biller and Danny
Prosky, were also executive officers and employees
and/or
holders of a direct or indirect interest in our former advisor
and GERI, which managed our former advisor, or their affiliated
entities. GERI owns a 75.0% managing member interest in our
former advisor, and Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
Management, LLC owns a 25.0% equity interest. As of
June 30, 2010, Ms. Biller owned an equity interest of
18.0% of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare Management, LLC.
Mr. Prosky and Ms. Biller resigned as officers of our
company on June 30, 2009 and July 10, 2009,
respectively.
Fees
and Expenses Paid to Former Affiliates
In the aggregate, for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, we incurred fees to our former advisor and its
affiliates of $0 and $17,531,000, respectively, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred fees
to our former advisor and its affiliates of $0 and $66,011,000,
respectively.
19
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Offering
Stage
Selling
Commissions
Prior to the transition of the dealer manager function to RCS,
our former dealer manager received selling commissions of up to
7.0% of the gross offering proceeds from the sale of shares of
our common stock in our initial offering other than shares of
our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP. Our former dealer
manager re-allowed all or a portion of these fees to
participating broker-dealers. For the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and $7,644,000,
respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and $35,337,000, respectively, in
selling commissions to our former dealer manager. Such selling
commissions are charged to stockholders equity as such
amounts were reimbursed to our former dealer manager from the
gross proceeds of our initial offering.
Marketing
Support Fees and Due Diligence Expense Reimbursements
Our former dealer manager received non-accountable marketing
support fees of up to 2.5% of the gross offering proceeds from
the sale of shares of our common stock in our initial offering
other than shares of our common stock sold pursuant to the DRIP.
Our former dealer manager re-allowed a portion up to 1.5% of the
gross offering proceeds for non-accountable marketing fees to
participating broker-dealers. In addition, in our initial
offering, we reimbursed our former dealer manager or its
affiliates an additional 0.5% of the gross offering proceeds for
accountable bona fide due diligence expenses, all or a
portion of which could be re-allowed to participating
broker-dealers. For the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and $2,757,000, respectively, and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
incurred $0 and $12,786,000, respectively, in marketing support
fees and due diligence expense reimbursements to our former
dealer manager. Such fees and reimbursements are charged to
stockholders equity as such amounts are reimbursed to our
former dealer manager or its affiliates from the gross proceeds
of our initial offering.
Other
Organizational and Offering Expenses
Our other organizational and offering expenses were paid by our
former advisor or its affiliates, who we generally refer to as
our former advisor, on our behalf. Our former advisor was
reimbursed for actual expenses incurred up to 1.5% of the gross
offering proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock in
our initial offering other than shares of our common stock sold
pursuant to the DRIP. For the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and $290,000,
respectively and for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and $2,557,000, respectively, in
offering expenses to our former advisor. Other organizational
expenses are expensed as incurred, and offering expenses are
charged to stockholders equity as such amounts are
reimbursed to our former advisor from the gross proceeds of our
initial offering.
Acquisition
and Development Stage
Acquisition
Fee
For the period from September 20, 2006 through
October 24, 2008, our former advisor received, as
compensation for services rendered in connection with the
investigation, selection and acquisition of properties, an
acquisition fee of up to 3.0% of the contract purchase price for
each property acquired or up to 4.0% of the total development
cost of any development property acquired, as applicable. As we
moved toward self-management, we
20
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
entered into an amendment to the Advisory Agreement, effective
as of October 24, 2008, which reduced the acquisition fee
payable to our former advisor from up to 3.0% to a lower fee
determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
for the first $375,000,000 in aggregate contract purchase price
for properties acquired directly or indirectly by us after
October 24, 2008, 2.5% of the contract purchase price of
each such property;
|
|
|
|
for the second $375,000,000 in aggregate contract purchase price
for properties acquired directly or indirectly by us after
October 24, 2008, 2.0% of the contract purchase price of
each such property, which amount is subject to downward
adjustment, but not below 1.5%, based on reasonable projections
regarding the anticipated amount of net proceeds to be received
in our initial offering; and
|
|
|
|
for above $750,000,000 in aggregate contract purchase price for
properties acquired directly or indirectly by us after
October 24, 2008, 2.25% of the contract purchase price of
each such property.
|
The Advisory Agreement also provided that we would pay an
acquisition fee in connection with the acquisition of real
estate related assets in an amount equal to 1.5% of the amount
funded to acquire or originate each such real estate related
asset.
We paid our former advisor acquisition fees for properties and
other real estate related assets acquired with funds raised in
our initial offering by our former dealer manager for such
acquisitions completed after the expiration of the Advisory
Agreement. We are no longer required to pay such fees to our
former advisor.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
incurred $0 and $4,071,000, respectively, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $0
and $6,008,000, respectively, in acquisition fees to our former
advisor. Acquisition fees are included in acquisition-related
expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations.
Operational
Stage
Asset
Management Fee
For the period from September 20, 2006 through
October 24, 2008, our former advisor was paid a monthly fee
for services rendered in connection with the management of our
assets in an amount equal to one-twelfth of 1.0% of the average
invested assets calculated as of the close of business on the
last day of each month, subject to our stockholders receiving
annualized distributions in an amount equal to at least 5.0% per
annum on average invested capital. The asset management fee was
calculated and payable monthly in cash or shares of our common
stock at the option of our former advisor.
In connection with the amendment to the Advisory Agreement,
effective as of October 24, 2008, we reduced the monthly
asset management fee to one-twelfth of 0.5% of our average
invested assets. As part of our transition to self-management,
this fee to our former advisor was eliminated in connection with
the expiration of the Advisory Agreement.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
incurred $0 and $1,196,000, respectively, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $0
and $3,783,000, respectively, in asset management fees to our
former advisor.
Property
Management Fee
Our former advisor was paid a monthly property management fee
equal to 4.0% of the gross cash receipts of our properties
through August 31, 2009. For properties managed by other
third parties besides our former advisor, our former advisor was
paid up to 1.0% of the gross cash receipts from the property as
a monthly oversight fee.
21
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
incurred $0 and $507,000, respectively, and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and
$2,289,000, respectively, in property management fees and
oversight fees to our former advisor, which is included in
rental expenses in our accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations. As part of our transition to
self-management, this fee to our former advisor was eliminated
in connection with the expiration of the Advisory Agreement.
Under
self-management,
we pay property management fees to third parties at market rates.
Lease
Fee
Our former advisor, as the property manager, was paid a separate
fee for leasing activities in an amount not to exceed the fee
customarily charged in arms length transactions by others
rendering similar services in the same geographic area for
similar properties, as determined by a survey of brokers and
agents in such area ranging between 3.0% and 8.0% of gross
revenues generated from the initial term of the lease. For the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred
$0 and $496,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and $1,173,000,
respectively, to Triple Net Properties Realty, Inc., or Realty
and its affiliates in lease fees, which are capitalized and
included in other assets, net, in our accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
On-site
Personnel and Engineering Payroll
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
GERI incurred payroll for
on-site
personnel and engineering on our behalf of $0 and $509,000,
respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, GERI incurred $0 and $1,865,000, respectively,
which is included in rental expenses in our accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Operating
Expenses
We reimbursed our former advisor for operating expenses incurred
in rendering its services to us, subject to certain limitations
on our operating expenses. We did not reimburse our former
advisor for operating expenses that exceeded the greater of:
(1) 2.0% of our average invested assets, as defined in the
Advisory Agreement, or (2) 25.0% of our net income, as
defined in the Advisory Agreement, unless a majority of our
independent directors determined that such excess expenses were
justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. Our
operating expenses did not exceed this limitation during the
term of the Advisory Agreement.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
GERI incurred on our behalf $0 and $4,000, respectively, and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, GERI
incurred on our behalf $0 and $35,000, respectively, in
operating expenses which is included in general and
administrative expenses in our accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
Related
Party Services Agreement
We entered into a services agreement, effective January 1,
2008, with GERI for subscription agreement processing and
investor services. The services agreement had an initial one
year term and was subject to successive one year renewals. On
March 17, 2009, GERI provided notice of its termination of
the services agreement. The termination was to be effective
September 20, 2009; however as part of our transition to
self-management,
we transitioned to DST Systems, Inc., our transfer agent and
provider of subscription processing and investor relations
services, as of August 10, 2009. Accordingly, the services
agreement with GERI terminated on August 9, 2009.
22
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
incurred $0 and $57,000, respectively, and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we incurred $0 and
$177,000, respectively, for investor services that GERI provided
to us, which is included in general and administrative expenses
in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, our
former advisor incurred $0 and $23,000, respectively, and for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, our
former advisor incurred $0 and $173,000, respectively, in
subscription agreement processing that GERI provided to us.
Compensation
for Additional Services
In periods preceding our transition to self-management during
the third quarter of 2009, our former advisor was paid for
services performed for us other than those required to be
rendered by our former advisor under the Advisory Agreement. The
rate of compensation for these services was required to be
approved by a majority of our board of directors, including a
majority of our independent directors, and could not exceed an
amount that would be paid to unaffiliated third parties for
similar services.
Liquidity
Stage
Disposition
Fee
We paid no disposition fees to our former advisor under the
terms of the Advisory Agreement. In addition, we have no
obligation to pay any disposition fees to our former advisor in
the future.
Subordinated
Participation Interest
Pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement for our
operating partnership, as amended on November 14, 2008, our
former advisor had the right to receive a subordinated
distribution upon the occurrence of certain liquidity events
based on the value of our assets owned at the time the Advisory
Agreement was terminated plus any assets acquired after such
termination for which our former advisor received an acquisition
fee. This right was purchased along with our former
advisors partnership units in our operating partnership
pursuant to the Redemption Agreement as discussed above and
in Note 19, Subsequent Events. For more information on the
subordinated participation interest, see Note 12, Related
Party Transactions, to our consolidated financial statements
included in our 2009 Annual Report.
Accounts
Payable Due to Former Affiliates, Net
The following amounts were outstanding to former affiliates as
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entity
|
|
Fee
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
27,000
|
|
|
$
|
27,000
|
|
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors
|
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors
|
|
Due diligence
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors
|
|
On-site payroll and engineering
|
|
|
104,000
|
|
|
|
104,000
|
|
Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors
|
|
Acquisition related expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,769,000
|
|
Triple Net Properties Realty, Inc.
|
|
Asset and property management fees
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,007,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,776,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
See Note 19, Subsequent Events, for additional information
regarding the status of this balance as of September 30,
2010 pursuant to our entry into a Redemption, Termination, and
Release Agreement with our former affiliates.
|
|
13.
|
Redeemable
Noncontrolling Interest of Limited Partners
|
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we
owned an approximately 99.89% and an approximately 99.99%,
respectively, general partner interest in our operating
partnership. Our former advisor was a limited partner of our
operating partnership as of September 30, 2010 and as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, owned an
approximately 0.01% limited partner interest in our operating
partnership. See Note 12, Related Party Transactions, and
Note 19, Subsequent Events, for information regarding
redemption of the limited partner interest held by our former
advisor. Additionally, approximately 0.10% of our operating
partnership is owned by individual physician investors that
elected to exchange their partnership interests in the
partnership that owns the 7900 Fannin medical office building
for limited partner units of our operating partnership. We
acquired the majority interest in the Fannin partnership on
September 30, 2010. In aggregate, approximately 0.11% of
the earnings of our operating partnership are allocated to
redeemable noncontrolling interest of limited partners.
As of December 31, 2009, we owned an 80.0% interest in the
JV Company that owns the Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center,
which was originally purchased on December 20, 2007. The
redeemable noncontrolling interest balance related to this
arrangement at December 31, 2009 was comprised of the
noncontrolling interests initial contribution, 20.0% of
the earnings at the Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center, and
accretion of the change in the redemption value over the period
from the purchase date to January 1, 2011, the earliest
redemption date. On March 24, 2010, our subsidiary
exercised its call option to buy, for $3,900,000, 100% of the
interest owned by its joint venture partner, BD St. Louis,
in the JV Company. As a result of the closing of the purchase on
March 24, 2010, we own a 100% interest in the Chesterfield
Rehabilitation Center, and the associated redeemable
noncontrolling interest balance related to this entity was
reduced to zero.
On June 30, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the
majority interest in the Fannin partnership, which owns the 7900
Fannin medical office building located in Houston, Texas on the
Texas Medical Center campus. At closing, we acquired the general
partner interest and the majority of the limited partner
interests in the Fannin partnership. The original physician
investors were provided the right to remain in the Fannin
partnership, receive limited partner units in our operating
partnership,
and/or
receive cash. Some of the original physician investors elected
to remain in the Fannin partnership post-closing as limited
partners.
Redeemable noncontrolling interests are accounted for in
accordance with ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities From
Equity, or ASC 480, at the greater of their carrying
amount or redemption value at the end of each reporting period.
Changes in the redemption value from the purchase date to the
earliest redemption date are accreted using the straight-line
method. The redemption value as of December 31, 2009 was
$3,549,000. As of September 30,
24
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
2010 and 2009, redeemable noncontrolling interest of limited
partners was $4,049,000 and $2,468,000, respectively. Below is a
table reflecting the activity of the redeemable noncontrolling
interests.
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,951,000
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited
partners
|
|
|
241,000
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(290,000
|
)
|
Adjustments to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
566,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,468,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,549,000
|
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest of limited
partners
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(116,000
|
)
|
Valuation adjustments to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
570,000
|
|
Purchase of Chesterfield 20% interest
|
|
|
(3,900,000
|
)
|
Addition of noncontrolling interest attributable to the Fannin
acquisition
|
|
|
4,006,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
4,049,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ($60,000) in net loss attributable to noncontrolling
interest shown on our September 30, 2010 condensed
consolidated statement of operations reflects $64,000 in net
income earned by the noncontrolling interest in the JV Company
prior to our purchase of this noncontrolling interest on
March 24, 2010 and $7,000 in net income attributable to our
operating partnership unit holders during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, offset by a net loss of ($131,000)
attributable to the Fannin partnership following our purchase of
this partnership on June 30, 2010.
There will be no additional net income attributable to the
Chesterfield noncontrolling interest going forward in the
current year beyond the $64,000 earned prior to our purchase of
this noncontrolling interest. The net impact to our equity as a
result of this purchase was $275,000.
Common
Stock
In April 2006, our former advisor purchased 200 shares of
our common stock for total cash consideration of $2,000 and was
admitted as our initial stockholder. Through September 30,
2010, we granted an aggregate of 400,200 shares of
restricted common stock to our independent directors, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
President Acquisitions pursuant to the terms and
conditions of our 2006 Incentive Plan and Employment Agreements
described below. Through September 30, 2010, we issued
175,562,607 shares of our common stock in connection with
our initial offering and follow-on offering and
9,988,254 shares of our common stock under the DRIP, and
repurchased 5,177,343 shares of our common stock under our
share repurchase plan. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, we had 180,683,141 and
140,590,686 shares of our common stock outstanding,
respectively.
Pursuant to our follow-on offering, we are offering and selling
to the public up to 200,000,000 shares of our
$0.01 par value common stock for $10.00 per share and up to
21,052,632 shares of our $0.01 par value common stock
to be issued pursuant to the DRIP at $9.50 per share. Our
charter authorizes us to issue 1,000,000,000 shares of our
common stock.
On August 16, 2010, we announced our intention to close our
follow-on offering early, subject to market conditions, on or
before April 30, 2011 but not earlier than
November 30, 2010, with
30-day prior
notice. Our follow-on offering is currently scheduled to expire
on March 19, 2012, unless extended. We will not terminate
our
25
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
follow-on offering early unless and until we determine that an
early termination is in the best interests of our stockholders
and market conditions are favorable.
Preferred
Stock
Our charter authorizes us to issue 200,000,000 shares of
our $0.01 par value preferred stock. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no shares of
preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
Distribution
Reinvestment Plan
The DRIP allows stockholders to purchase additional shares of
our common stock through the reinvestment of distributions,
subject to certain conditions. We registered and reserved
21,052,632 shares of our common stock for sale pursuant to
the DRIP in each of our initial and follow-on offerings. For the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, $14,490,000
and $10,884,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested
and 1,525,248 and 1,145,699 shares of our common stock,
respectively, were issued under the DRIP. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, $40,556,000 and
$26,666,000, respectively, in distributions were reinvested and
4,269,072 and 2,807,028 shares of our common stock,
respectively, were issued under the DRIP. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, a total of
$94,888,000 and $54,331,000, respectively, in distributions were
reinvested and 9,988,254 and 5,719,182 shares of our common
stock, respectively, were issued under the DRIP.
Share
Repurchase Plan
Our board of directors has approved a share repurchase plan. On
August 24, 2006, we received SEC exemptive relief from
rules restricting issuer purchases during distributions. The
share repurchase plan allows for share repurchases by us upon
request by stockholders when certain criteria are met by the
requesting stockholders. Share repurchases will be made at the
sole discretion of our board of directors. Funds for the
repurchase of shares will come exclusively from the proceeds we
receive from the sale of shares under the DRIP.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
repurchased 1,257,752 shares of our common stock, for an
aggregate amount of $12,015,000, and 384,727 shares of our
common stock, for $3,676,000, respectively. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we repurchased
3,277,584 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate
amount of $31,173,000 and 791,112 shares of our common
stock, for an aggregate amount of $7,528,000, respectively. As
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had
repurchased a total of 5,117,343 shares of our common
stock, for an aggregate amount of $48,516,000, and
1,839,759 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate
amount of $17,343,000, respectively.
2006
Incentive Plan and 2006 Independent Directors Compensation
Plan
Under the terms of our 2006 Incentive Plan, the aggregate number
of shares of our common stock subject to options, shares of
restricted common stock, restricted stock units, stock purchase
rights, stock appreciation rights or other awards, including
those issuable under its
sub-plan,
the 2006 Independent Directors Compensation Plan, will be no
more than 2,000,000 shares.
The fair value of each share of restricted common stock and
restricted common stock unit that has been granted under the
plan is estimated at the date of grant at $10.00 per share, the
per share price of shares in our initial offering and our
follow-on offering, and is amortized on a straight-line basis
over the vesting period. Shares of restricted common stock and
restricted common stock units may not be sold, transferred,
exchanged, assigned, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise
encumbered. Such restrictions expire upon vesting.
26
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
recognized compensation expense of $514,000 and $544,000,
respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, we recognized compensation expense of $879,000
and $660,000, respectively, related to the restricted common
stock grants. Such compensation expense is included in general
and administrative expenses in our accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations. Shares of restricted
common stock have full voting rights and rights to dividends.
Shares of restricted common stock units do not have voting
rights or rights to dividends.
A portion of our awards may be paid in cash in lieu of stock in
accordance with the respective employment agreement and vesting
schedule of such awards. These awards are revalued at the end of
every reporting period with the cash redemption liability
reflected on our consolidated balance sheets, if material. For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010,
approximately 32,500 shares were settled in cash for
approximately $325,000. As of September 30, 2010, the
liability balance associated with the cash awards was $140,000.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there
was approximately $3,103,000 and $1,881,000, respectively, of
total unrecognized compensation expense net of estimated
forfeitures, related to nonvested shares of restricted common
stock. As of September 30, 2010, this expense is expected
to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of
2.3 years.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
fair value of the nonvested shares of restricted common stock
and restricted common stock units was $3,082,000 and $1,677,000,
respectively. A summary of the status of the nonvested shares of
restricted common stock and restricted common stock units as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the
changes for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Average Grant
|
|
|
|
Stock/Units
|
|
|
Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
|
|
167,667
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
Granted, net
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(63,324
|
)
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2010
|
|
|
309,501
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares expected to vest September 30,
2010
|
|
|
309,501
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or
ASC 820, defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a
market-based measurement, as opposed to a transaction-specific
measurement and most of the provisions were effective for our
consolidated financial statements beginning January 1, 2008.
Fair value is defined by ASC 820 as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Depending on the nature of the asset or
liability, various techniques and assumptions can be used to
estimate the fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are
measured using inputs from three levels of the fair value
hierarchy, as follows:
Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted)
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we
have the ability to access at the measurement date. An active
market is defined as a market in which transactions for the
assets or liabilities occur with sufficient frequency and volume
to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2 Inputs include quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices
for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that
are not active (markets with few transactions), inputs other
than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs
27
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
that derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data correlation or other means (market corroborated
inputs).
Level 3 Unobservable inputs, only used to the
extent that observable inputs are not available, reflect our
assumptions about the pricing of an asset or liability.
ASC 825, Financial Instruments, or ASC 825, which
codified Statements of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities including an Amendment of
Statement No. 115, and No. 107, Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires
disclosure of fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements as well as in annual financial statements.
We use fair value measurements to record fair value of certain
assets and to estimate fair value of financial instruments not
recorded at fair value but required to be disclosed at fair
value.
Financial
Instruments Reported at Fair Value
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
We invest in money market funds which are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued
using unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for
identical securities.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Currently, we use interest rate swaps and interest rate caps to
manage interest rate risk associated with floating rate debt.
The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely
accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow
analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This
analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives,
including the period to maturity, and uses observable
market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied
volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps and
interest rate caps are determined using the market standard
methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash payments
and the discounted expected variable cash receipts. The variable
cash receipts are based on an expectation of future interest
rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest
rate curves.
To comply with ASC 820, we incorporate credit valuation
adjustments to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance
risk and the respective counterpartys nonperformance risk
in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of
our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk,
we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable
credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds,
mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used
to value our interest rate swap and interest rate cap
derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with our
derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of
current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by
us and our counterparties. However, as of September 30,
2010, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the
credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our
derivative positions and have determined that the credit
valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall
valuation of our derivatives. As a result, we have determined
that our interest rate swap and interest rate cap derivative
valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy.
As of September 30, 2010, there have been no transfers of
assets or liabilities between levels.
28
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities at Fair Value
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2010,
aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
those measurements fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Liabilities
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1 )
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
255,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
298,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,626,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,626,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,626,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,626,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents our assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009,
aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which
those measurements fall.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Liabilities
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1 )
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
Derivative financial instruments(a)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
890,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,051,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,941,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
43,000
|
|
|
$
|
890,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,051,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,984,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,625,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,625,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,625,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,625,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, we reevaluated
a feature within the Rush Presbyterian Note Receivable which had
been disclosed in our Annual Report as a derivative financial
instrument. Based on this reevaluation, we determined that this
feature, by its nature, qualifies for a scope exception under
ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and thus may be
excluded from classification as a derivative financial
instrument. As such, we have prospectively corrected our fair
value and derivative instrument disclosures with respect to this
feature. |
Financial
Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value
ASC 825 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial
instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the
balance sheet. Fair value is defined under ASC 820.
Our accompanying consolidated balance sheets include the
following financial instruments: real estate notes receivable,
net, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and
other receivables, net, accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, accounts payable due to affiliates, net, mortgage
loans payable, net, and borrowings under the credit facility.
29
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
We consider the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, accounts and other receivables, net, and
accounts payable and accrued liabilities to approximate fair
value for these financial instruments because of the short
period of time between origination of the instruments and their
expected realization. The fair value of accounts payable due to
former affiliates, net, is not determinable due to the related
party nature.
The fair value of the mortgage loans payable is estimated using
borrowing rates available to us for mortgage loans payable with
similar terms and maturities. As of September 30, 2010, the
fair value of the mortgage loans payable was $618,846,000,
compared to the carrying value of $594,428,000. As of
December 31, 2009, the fair value of the mortgage loans
payable was $532,000,000, compared to the carrying value of
$540,028,000.
The fair value of our notes receivable is estimated by
discounting the expected cash flows on the notes at current
rates at which management believes similar loans would be made.
As of September 30, 2010, the fair value of the notes
receivable was $67,820,000, compared to the carrying value of
$56,505,000. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of our
notes receivable was $61,120,000, as compared to the carrying
value of $54,763,000.
|
|
16.
|
Business
Combinations
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we completed
the acquisition of 17 new properties as well as purchased three
additional medical office buildings within existing portfolios.
In addition, we purchased the remaining 20% interest in the JV
Company that owns Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center. These
purchases added a total of approximately 1,536,000 square
feet of GLA to our property portfolio. The aggregate purchase
price for these acquisitions was $342,745,000 plus closing costs
of $3,337,000. See Note 3, Real Estate Investments, for a
listing of the properties acquired and the dates of acquisition.
Results of operations for the property acquisitions are
reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 for
the periods subsequent to the acquisition dates.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we completed
the acquisition of three properties and three office
condominiums relating to an existing property in our portfolio,
adding a total of approximately 1,191,000 square feet of
GLA to our property portfolio. The aggregate purchase price was
$240,324,000 plus closing costs of $8,560,000. As of
September 30, 2009, the aggregate purchase price was
allocated in the amount of $7,508,000 to land, $179,273,000 to
building and improvements, $16,657,000 to tenant improvements,
$21,817,000 to lease commissions, $14,220,000 to tenant
relationships, $212,000 to leasehold interest in land, $662,000
to above market leases, and $(25,000) to below market leases.
In accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations,
or ASC 805, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141R, Business Combinations, we, with
assistance from independent valuation specialists, allocate the
purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identified
intangible assets and liabilities based on their respective fair
values. The allocation to tangible assets (building and land) is
based upon our determination of the value of the property as if
it were to be replaced and vacant using discounted cash flow
models similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors
considered by us include an estimate of carrying costs during
the expected
lease-up
periods considering current market conditions and costs to
execute similar leases. Additionally, the purchase price of the
applicable property is allocated to the above or below market
value of in place leases, the value of in place leases, tenant
relationships, above or below market debt assumed, and any
contingent consideration transferred in the combination.
As of September 30, 2010 the aggregate purchase price was
allocated in the amount of $13,986,000 to land, $257,185,000 to
building and improvements, $12,406,000 to tenant improvements,
$8,114,000 to lease commissions, $18,085,000 to leases in place,
$25,138,000 to tenant relationships, $2,200,000 to leasehold
interest in land, $(4,171,000) to above market debt, $5,988,000
to above market leases, and $(429,000) to below market leases.
Note that these amounts pertain to all acquisitions during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 except for the
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center noncontrolling interest
purchase; as discussed below, this purchase of additional
interest was accounted for as an equity transaction and thus it
is not included within the aggregate purchase price allocation
disclosed herein. Additionally, the allocable portion of the
aggregate purchase
30
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
price does not include $343,000 in certain credits
representative of contingent purchase price adjustments and
liabilities assumed by us that served to reduce the total cash
tendered for these acquisitions.
As of September 30, 2010, we owned one property, purchased
during the three months ended September 30, 2010, that is
subject to an earnout provision obligating us to pay additional
consideration to the seller contingent on the future leasing and
occupancy of vacant space at the property. This earnout payment
is based on a predetermined formula and has a set
24-month
time period regarding the obligation to make these payments. If,
at the end of this time period, certain space has not been
leased and occupied, we will have no further obligation.
Assuming all conditions are satisfied under the earnout
agreement, we would be obligated to pay an estimated $1,752,000
to the seller. As of September 30, 2010, no such payments
under the earnout agreement have been made.
Brief descriptions of the property acquisitions completed for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
An 80,652 square foot medical office portfolio consisting
of two buildings located in Atlanta, Georgia. This portfolio is
over 95% leased and was purchased on March 2, 2010 for
$19,550,000.
|
|
|
|
A 53,169 square foot medical office building located in
Jacksonville, Florida, purchased on March 9, 2010 for
$10,775,000. This building is 100% occupied and is situated on
the campus of St. Vincents Medical Center.
|
|
|
|
A 60,300 square foot medical office building located in
Sugarland, Texas, purchased on March 23, 2010 for
$12,400,000. This facility is located near three acute-care
hospitals and is 100% leased with 83% of the space occupied by
Texas Childrens Health Centers.
|
|
|
|
A five-building medical office portfolio located in Evansville
and Newburgh, Indiana, totaling 260,500 square feet and
purchased on March 23, 2010 for $45,257,000. The portfolio
is 100% master-leased to Deaconess Clinic, Inc., an affiliate of
Deaconess Health System, Inc.
|
|
|
|
A 60,800 square foot medical office building located on the
campus of East Cooper Regional Medical Center in Mount Pleasant,
South Carolina, purchased on March 31, 2010 for $9,925,000.
The building is 88% leased to 16 tenants.
|
|
|
|
A 34,980 square foot medical office building located in
Pearland, Texas, purchased on March 31, 2010 for
$6,775,000. The building is 98% occupied. On June 30, 2010,
we purchased a second building within the Pearland portfolio:
this add-on acquisition consisted of a 19,680 square foot
medical office building that was purchased for $3,701,000 and is
100% occupied.
|
|
|
|
A 21,832 square foot medical office building located in
Hilton Head, South Carolina, purchased on March 31, 2010
for $8,058,000. The building is 100% occupied. On
August 12, 2010, we purchased a second building within the
Hilton ad portfolio: this add-on acquisition consisted of a
9,062 square foot medical office building that is 100%
occupied and was purchased for $2,652,000.
|
|
|
|
A 101,400 square foot medical office building located in
Baltimore, Maryland, purchased on March 31, 2010 for
$29,250,000. The building is located on the Johns Hopkins
University Bayview Medical Center Research Campus and is 100%
leased.
|
|
|
|
The remaining 20% interest in the JV Company that owns
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center. Our subsidiary exercised its
call option to buy, for $3,900,000, 100% of the interest owned
by its joint venture partner. As we continued to retain control
of this entity despite the change in ownership interest, in
accordance with ASC 805, we are accounting for this as an
equity transaction. Thus, no gains or losses with respect to
these changes were recognized in net income, nor are the
carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary
adjusted. As such, this acquisition is not included within the
purchase price allocation disclosed within this footnote.
|
31
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
A 191,612 square foot medical office building located in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. This building, which is located near
the Federal North and Allegheny General Hospital Centers, is 99%
occupied and was purchased on April 29, 2010 for
$40,472,000.
|
|
|
|
A two-building medical office portfolio in Denton, Texas, and
Lewisville, Texas totaling 53,720 square feet. The
Lewisville medical office building, purchased on June 25,
2010 for $4,800,000, consists of approximately
18,000 square feet and is 100% leased to one tenant with a
remaining term of 10 years. The Denton medical office
building, purchased on June 30, 2010 for $8,700,000, is an
approximately 35,720 square foot facility located on the
campus of Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton, and it is
100% leased through 2017.
|
|
|
|
A 45,500 square foot medical office building located in
Charleston, South Carolina for approximately $10,446,000. This
building, which was purchased on June 28, 2010, is 100%
leased and is located immediately adjacent to the campus of the
Medical University of South Carolina, or MUSC, and MUSC
Childrens Hospital.
|
|
|
|
The majority interest in the Fannin partnership, which owns a
medical office building located in Houston, Texas, on
June 30, 2010. The value of the 7900 Fannin building is
approximately $38,100,000. We acquired the general partner
interest and the majority of the limited partner interests in
the Fannin partnership. The original physician investors were
provided the right to remain in the Fannin partnership, receive
limited partner units in our operating partnership,
and/or
receive cash. Some of the original physician investors elected
to remain in the Fannin partnership post-closing as limited
partners. The property, known as 7900 Fannin, consists of a
four-story building totaling 176,000 square feet that is
adjacent to The Womans Hospital of Texas, an
HCA-affiliated hospital within the Texas Medical Center. The
building is currently over 99% occupied.
|
|
|
|
A 35,177 square foot medical office building located in
Stockbridge, Georgia. This building, which is situated in the
southern suburbs of Atlanta, Georgia near the Henry Medical
Center, has an occupancy rate of 100% and was purchased on
July 15, 2010 for $8,140,000.
|
|
|
|
A 45,000 square foot Class A medical office building
located in San Luis Obispo, California. This building,
which is located on the campus of the Sierra Vista Regional
Medical Center, is approximately 85% leased and was purchased on
August 4, 2010 for $10,950,000.
|
|
|
|
A two-building medical office portfolio in Orlando, Florida
totaling 105,555 square feet for an aggregate purchase
price of $18,300,000. The Oviedo Medical Center is located
approximately 10 miles northeast of Orlando and is adjacent
to Florida Hospitals CentraCare urgent care center. The
Lake Underhill Medical Center is located on the campus of
Florida Hospital East Orlando. Both buildings were purchased on
September 29, 2010, and they have an aggregate occupancy of
98%.
|
|
|
|
A 33,631 square foot medical office building located in
Santa Fe, New Mexico. This building, which is located
adjacent to the CHRISTUS St. Vincent Hospital and is currently
100% leased, was purchased on September 30, 2010 for
$9,560,000.
|
|
|
|
Two buildings within a five-building portfolio, one of which is
located in Las Vegas, Nevada and the other of which is located
in Poughkeepsie, New York. The San Martin Medical Arts
Pavilion, located in Las Vegas, is an approximately
73,300 square foot multi-tenant office building located on
the San Martin Campus of St. Rose Dominican Hospital.
It was purchased on September 30, 2010 for approximately
$18,061,000. The St. Francis Medical Arts Pavilion, located
in Poughkeepsie, which consists of approximately
79,000 square feet, was also purchased on
September 30, 2010 for approximately $22,973,000. The
buildings have an aggregate occupancy of approximately 95%.
|
We recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 of approximately $8,271,000 and
$1,582,000, respectively, related to the above acquisitions. Net
income included $345,000 in closing cost expenses related to the
acquisitions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
we recorded
32
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
revenues and net income of approximately $13,436,000 and
$711,000, respectively, related to the above acquisitions. Net
income included $3,337,000 in closing cost expenses related to
the acquisitions.
Supplementary
Pro-Forma Information
Assuming the property acquisitions discussed above had occurred
on January 1, 2010, for the three months ended
September 30, 2010, pro forma revenues, net income and net
income per basic and diluted share would have been $52,728,000,
$2,244,000 and $0.01, respectively, and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, pro forma revenues, net income
and net income per basic and diluted share would have been
$154,946,000, $10,314,000, and $0.07, respectively.
Assuming the property acquisitions discussed above had occurred
on January 1, 2009, for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, pro forma revenues, net loss and net
loss per basic and diluted share would have been $40,072,000,
$(4,608,000) and $(0.04), respectively, and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, pro forma revenues, net loss and
net loss per basic and diluted share would have been
$117,174,000, $(4,190,000), and $(0.04), respectively.
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that would have been obtained had the
acquisitions occurred at the beginning of the periods presented,
nor are they necessarily indicative of future operating results.
|
|
17.
|
Concentration
of Credit Risk
|
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a
concentration of credit risk are primarily cash and cash
equivalents, restricted cash, and accounts receivable from
tenants. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, we had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
accounts in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or
FDIC, insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable
from tenants is limited. We perform credit evaluations of
prospective tenants, and security deposits are obtained upon
lease execution. In addition, we evaluate tenants in connection
with the acquisition of a property.
As of September 30, 2010, we had interests in 14
consolidated properties located in Texas, which accounted for
16.7% of our total rental income, interests in six consolidated
properties located in South Carolina, which accounted for 15.5%
of our total rental income, interests in six consolidated
properties located in Indiana, which accounted for 11.8% of our
total rental income, and interests in five consolidated
properties located in Arizona, which accounted for 11.3% of our
total rental income. This rental income is based on contractual
base rent from leases in effect as of September 30, 2010.
Accordingly, there is a geographic concentration of risk subject
to fluctuations in each states economy.
As of September 30, 2009, we had interests in seven
consolidated properties located in Texas, which accounted for
16.3% of our total rental income, interests in five consolidated
properties located in Indiana, which accounted for 13.9% of our
total rental income, and interests in four consolidated
properties located in Arizona, which accounted for 3.7% of our
total rental income. We had one interest in a consolidated
property located in South Carolina as of September 30,
2009, which accounted for 0.7% of our total rental income. This
rental income is based on contractual base rent from leases in
effect as of September 30, 2009. Accordingly, there is a
geographic concentration of risk subject to fluctuations in each
states economy.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, none of our tenants at our consolidated
properties accounted for 10.0% or more of our aggregate annual
rental income.
33
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
We report earnings (loss) per share pursuant to ASC 260,
Earnings Per Share, or ASC 260. We include unvested
share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights
to dividends or dividend equivalents as participating
securities in the computation of basic and diluted income
per share pursuant to the two-class method as described in
ASC 260. We have two classes of common stock for purposes
of calculating our earnings per share. These classes are our
common stock and our restricted stock. For the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2010, all of our earnings
were distributed and the calculated earnings per share amount
would be the same for both classes as they all have the same
rights to distributed earnings.
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable for each of the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are
computed by dividing net income (loss), reduced by the amount of
dividends declared in the current period, by the weighted
average number of shares of our common stock outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed based
on the weighted average number of shares of our common stock and
all potentially dilutive securities, if any. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010, our potentially
dilutive securities did not have a material impact to our
earnings per share. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we did not have any securities that
gave rise to potentially dilutive shares of our common stock.
The significant events that occurred subsequent to the balance
sheet date but prior to the filing of this report that would
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements
are summarized below.
Status
of our Offering
From October 1, 2010 through November 11, 2010, we had
received and accepted subscriptions in our follow-on offering
for 11,636,995 shares of our common stock, for an aggregate
amount of approximately $116,261,000, excluding shares of our
common stock issued under the DRIP. As of November 11,
2010, we had received and accepted subscriptions in our
offerings for 187,483,251 shares of our common stock, for
an aggregate amount of approximately $1,872,958,000, excluding
shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
On August 16, 2010, we announced our intention to close our
follow-on offering early, subject to market conditions, on or
before April 30, 2011 but not earlier than
November 30, 2010, with
30-day prior
notice. Our follow-on offering is currently scheduled to expire
on March 19, 2012, unless extended. We will not terminate
our follow-on offering early unless and until we determine that
an early termination is in the best interests of our
stockholders and market conditions are favorable. As of
November 15, 2010, we have not provided any such notice to
our stockholders regarding termination of our follow-on offering.
Financing
Unsecured
Credit Facility
On October 13, 2010, we and Healthcare Trust of America
Holdings, LP, our operating partnership, entered into a credit
agreement, or the credit agreement, with JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., as administrative agent, or JPMorgan, Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as syndication agents,
and the lenders named therein to obtain an unsecured revolving
credit facility in an aggregate maximum principal amount of
$200,000,000, or the unsecured credit facility, subject to
increase. This credit facility replaced our previous secured
credit facility. It has an intial term of 12 months with
two three-month extensions available, subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions.
The credit agreement contains various affirmative and negative
covenants that we believe are usual for facilities and
transactions of this type, including limitations on the
incurrence of debt by us, our operating partnership and
34
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
its subsidiaries that own unencumbered assets, limitations on
the nature of our operating partnerships business, and
limitations on distributions by our operating partnership and
its subsidiaries that own unencumbered assets. Additionally, the
credit agreement contains various financial covenants for us and
our operating partnership, as applicable, including a maximum
ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and minimum
ratios of unencumbered asset value to total commitments, of
EBITDA to fixed charges, and of tangible net worth. With this
credit facility, we will have the ability to timely utilize
corporate-level debt, if and when needed, for strategic
acquisitions and other corporate purposes.
Secured
Term Loan Commitment
On November 3, 2010, we obtained a commitment, subject to
certain customary conditions to closing, from Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. for a senior secured real estate term loan in the maximum
amount of $135,000,000. The purpose of this facility is to
provide proceeds to be used for the repayment of the six Wells
Fargo Bank loans totaling $99,000,000, with excess proceeds to
be used to finance additional office and medical office
buildings that are held as collateral. Interest shall be payable
monthly at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.35%. The facility
has an initial term of 36 months and includes two
12-month
extension options, subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions. Financial covenant thresholds and definitions for
the secured term loan facility will mirror those contained
within our unsecured credit facility agented by JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as described in the preceding section. In addition,
the credit agreement for this secured term loan will include
events of default that we believe are usual for facilities and
transactions of this type. The completion of the secured term
loan described above is subject to the satisfaction of a number
of conditions, and, as such, we cannot guarantee completion.
On November 3, 2010, we also purchased an interest rate
swap with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as counterparty for a notional
amount of $75,000,000. The interest rate swap is secured by the
pool of assets collateralizing the secured term loan. The
effective date of the swap is March 1, 2011, and its
termination date of December 31, 2013 coincides with the
initial term of the secured term loan. The swap will fix the
LIBOR portion of our monthly interest payments at 1.085%,
thereby effectively fixing our all-in interest rate on the
secured term loan at 3.435%.
This secured term loan will serve to refinance approximately
$17,200,000 of our debt maturing in 2010 and approximately
$82,000,000 of our debt maturing in 2011.
Debt
Repayment
On October 1, 2010, the mortgage loan related to our East
Florida Senior Care Portfolio reached maturity and we
accordingly repaid the $29,101,000 principal balance that was in
existence at September 30, 2010.
Loan
Maturity Extension
On November 11, 2010, the mortgage loan related to our
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center, the principal balance of
which is $22,000,000, was granted a one-year extension beyond
its initial maturity date of December 30, 2010.
Share
Repurchases
In October 2010, we repurchased 2,045,466 shares of our
common stock, for an aggregate amount of approximately
$16,838,000, under our share repurchase plan.
35
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
Entry
into Redemption, Termination and Release Agreement
On October 18, 2010, we entered into the
Redemption Agreement with our former sponsor, our former
advisor, our former dealer manager, and certain of their
affiliates, or the Grubb related parties. Pursuant to the
Redemption Agreement, we purchased the limited partner
interest, including all rights with respect to a subordinated
distribution upon the occurrence of specified liquidity events
and other rights held by our former advisor in our operating
partnership. For more information regarding the subordinated
distribution right that was purchased, see Note 12, Related
Party Transactions, to our consolidated financial statements
included in our 2009 Annual Report. In addition, we and the
Grubb related parties resolved all remaining issues between the
parties. In connection with the execution of the
Redemption Agreement, we made a one-time payment to the
Grubb related parties of $8,000,000. We believe that the
execution of the Redemption Agreement represents the final
stage of our successful transition from Grubb & Ellis
and that the Redemption Agreement further positions us to
take advantage of potential strategic opportunities in the
future.
Distributions
On October 1, 2010, for the month ended September 30,
2010, we paid distributions of $10,535,000 ($5,507,000 in cash
and $5,028,000 in shares of our common stock) pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP.
On November 3, 2010, for the month ended October 31,
2010, we paid distributions of $11,300,000 ($5,846,000 in cash
and $5,454,000 in shares of our common stock) pursuant to the
DRIP.
Completed
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
On October 29, 2010, we completed the acquisition of a
228,900 square foot medical office building located less
than one mile from Allegheny General Hospital, a hospital in the
West Penn Allegheny Health System, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
The building is currently 100% leased and was purchased for
approximately $39,000,000.
|
|
|
|
On November 12, 2010, we purchased a multi-tenant medical
office building located in Raleigh, North Carolina for
$16,500,000. This building consists of 89,000 square feet
and is currently over 98.2% occupied.
|
|
|
|
On November 12, 2010, we purchased an additional medical
office building within our Rendina portfolio for $14,034,000.
This building, located in St. Louis, Missouri, consists of
48,009 square feet and has an occupancy rate of over 96%.
|
Pending
Property Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
On August 12, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale
agreements to purchase two medical office buildings within a
medical office portfolio located in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
One of the buildings within this portfolio was purchased during
the three months ended September 30, 2010 for $9,560,000
and is further described in Note 16, Business Combinations.
The second building, the purchase price for which is
approximately $6,232,000, consists of 19,290 square feet
and is 100% occupied.
|
|
|
|
On September 4, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale
agreements to purchase two additional medical office buildings
within the Rendina portfolio. These buildings, located in
Tucson, Arizona and Wellington, Florida, comprise a total of
approximately 108,151 square feet and each have an
occupancy rate of 100%. The aggregate purchase price associated
with these two medical office buildings is $29,174,000.
|
36
Healthcare
Trust of America, Inc.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
On October 5, 2010, we signed purchase and sale agreements
to acquire a portfolio of four medical office buildings located
in Phoenix, Arizona for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $60,753,000. This portfolio consists of 270,843
total square feet and has an aggregate occupancy of
approximately 98.3%.
|
|
|
|
On October 22, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale
agreements to acquire a portfolio of nine medical office
buildings located in Albany and Carmel, New York, North Adams,
Massachusetts, and Temple Terrace, Florida for approximately
$196,645,000. The total portfolio consists of approximately
959,893 square feet and has an aggregate occupancy of 98%.
|
|
|
|
On November 11, 2010, we signed a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire a 220,000 square foot portfolio
consisting of four long-term acute care hospitals located in
Augusta, Georgia, Orlando and Tallahassee, Florida, and Dallas,
Texas. These buildings, the aggregate purchase price for which
is $99,000,000, are each 100% occupied.
|
The completion of each of the pending acquisitions described
above is subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions,
and we cannot guarantee that these acquisitions will be
completed.
37
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The use of the words we, us or
our refers to Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. and
its subsidiaries, including Healthcare Trust of America
Holdings, LP, except where the context otherwise requires.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
as well as with the audited consolidated financial statements,
accompanying notes, and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2010, or the 2009 Annual
Report. Such interim condensed consolidated financial statements
and information have been prepared to reflect our financial
position as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, together with our results of operations for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and cash
flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Forward-Looking
Statements
Historical results and trends should not be taken as indicative
of future operations. Our statements contained in this report
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may differ
materially from those included in the forward-looking
statements. We intend those forward-looking statements to be
covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of
complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking
statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe
future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally
identifiable by use of the words believe,
expect, intend, anticipate,
estimate, project,
prospects, or similar expressions. Our ability to
predict results or the actual effect of future plans or
strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a
material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects
on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and
healthcare markets specifically;
|
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory changes impacting the healthcare
industry, including the implementation of the healthcare reform
legislation enacted in 2010;
|
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory changes impacting real estate
investment trusts, or REITs, including their taxation;
|
|
|
|
the availability of debt and equity capital;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
competition in the real estate industry;
|
|
|
|
the supply and demand for operating properties in our proposed
market areas;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, or GAAP; and
|
|
|
|
the risk factors in our 2009 Annual Report and this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
|
Important factors currently known to management that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those in
forward-looking statements, and that could negatively affect our
business are discussed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as our
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
under the heading Risk Factors.
Forward-looking statements express expectations of future
events. All forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain
as they are based on various expectations and assumptions
concerning future events and they are subject to numerous known
and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual
events or results to differ materially from those projected. Due
to these inherent uncertainties, the investment community is
urged not to
38
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. In addition,
we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking
statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of
unanticipated events or changes to projections over time. As a
result of these and other factors, our stock and note prices may
fluctuate dramatically.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating
forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be
placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us
and our business, including additional factors that could
materially affect our financial results, is included herein and
in our other filings with the SEC.
Overview
and Background
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc., a Maryland corporation, was
incorporated on April 20, 2006. We were initially
capitalized on April 28, 2006, and therefore, we consider
that our date of inception.
2010
Company Highlights
Acquisitions
and Portfolio Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Since January 1, 2010, we have completed 19 new
acquisitions, expanded four of our existing portfolios through
the purchase of an additional medical office building within
each, and purchased the remaining 20% interest we previously did
not own in the HTA-Duke Chesterfield Rehab, LLC, which owns the
Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center. These purchases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
consist of 31 medical office buildings;
|
|
|
|
have an aggregate purchase price of approximately $412,279,000;
|
|
|
|
comprise a total of approximately 1,904,301 square
feet; and
|
|
|
|
possess a strong average occupancy rate of 97.4%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a number of currently pending acquisitions in our
pipeline, which we expect to close during the fourth quarter of
2010. These pending acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
would add a total of approximately 1,548,186 square feet to
our current portfolio;
|
|
|
|
have an aggregate purchase price of approximately $391,804,000,
bringing our total expected asset portfolio in excess of
$2 billion as of year-end 2010; and
|
|
|
|
have an average occupancy rate of 96%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our asset management performance and acquisition performance has
allowed us to realize a 63% and a 66% increase in our net
operating income, or NOI, for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009. NOI is a non-GAAP
financial measure. For a reconciliation of NOI to net income
(loss), see Net Operating Income.
|
|
|
|
We maintained a strong occupancy rate of approximately 91% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
FFO
and MFFO Performance
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, our funds
from operations, or FFO, has increased by 559% to $20,371,000
from $3,092,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2009. FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation
of FFO to net income (loss), see Funds from Operations and
Modified Funds from Operations.
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
Our FFO of $55,931,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 represents a 202% increase over our FFO
of $18,504,000 recorded for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our FFO of
$55,931,000 fully covered the $42,870,000 portion of our
distributions that was paid in cash.
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, our modified
funds from operations, or MFFO, has increased by 80% to
$21,390,000 from $11,869,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009. MFFO is a
non-GAAP
financial measure. For a reconciliation of MFFO to net income
(loss), see Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from
Operations.
|
|
|
|
Our MFFO of $63,782,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 represents a 104% increase over our MFFO
of $31,322,000 recorded for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Our MFFO of $63,782,000 represented 76% of our distributions
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This
represents a percentage increase of 31% over our MFFO coverage
rate of 58% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
Financing &
Liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
On October 13, 2010, we obtained an unsecured credit
facility in the aggregate maximum principal amount of
$200,000,000, subject to increase. This credit facility will
afford us the ability to timely utilize corporate-level debt, if
and when needed, for strategic acquisitions and other corporate
purposes.
|
|
|
|
On November 3, 2010, we obtained a commitment, subject to
certain customary conditions to closing, from Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. for a variable rate senior secured real estate term loan in
the maximum amount of $135,000,000 to refinance approximately
$99,000,000 of certain debt maturing in 2010 and 2011 and to
finance additional office and medical office buildings that are
held as collateral. Concurrently, we entered into an interest
rate swap on $75,000,000 of this secured term loan, effectively
fixing the interest rate for this portion at 3.435%.
|
|
|
|
We maintained a leverage ratio of our mortgage loans payable
debt to total assets of 29.8%.
|
|
|
|
We finished the period with a strong cash position, maintaining
cash on hand of $221,186,000 as of September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we secured
approximately $79,125,000 in new long term financing with a
weighted average interest rate of 5.75% and a weighted average
term of 8.1 years. These loans are secured by our
Greenville, Wisconsin MOB II, Deaconess, and NIH Triad
properties.
|
|
|
|
The long term financing and financing commitment we have secured
since January 1, 2010, including the $135,000,000 secured
real estate term loan commitment (subject to certain customary
conditions to closing), has allowed us to reduce our overall
cost of borrowing.
|
Self-Management
Impact
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, we
would have been required to pay acquisition, asset management
and above market property management fees of approximately
$7,933,000 and $24,887,000, respectively, to our former advisor
if we were still subject to the advisory agreement under its
original terms prior to the commencement of our transition to
self-management.
|
|
|
|
The cost of self-management during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $2,839,000 and
$7,057,000, respectively. Therefore, we achieved a cost savings
of approximately $5,094,000 ($7,933,000 minus $2,839,000) for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
$17,830,000 ($24,887,000 minus $7,057,000) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 resulting from our self-management
cost structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with our self-management model, we have implemented
another upgrade to our asset management capabilities by
implementing Resolve Technologys business intelligence
solution. The new information technology integrates and
consolidates our existing technology platforms and provides
management with reports that enable real-time visibility into
asset and portfolio performance.
|
Stockholder
Value Enhancement
|
|
|
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we engaged
J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC (JP Morgan) to act
as our lead strategic advisor. JP Morgan will assist our board
and management team in exploring various actions to maximize
stockholder value, including the assessment of various liquidity
alternatives. As we have previously disclosed, we intend to
effect a liquidity event by September 2013.
|
|
|
|
On October 18, 2010 we entered into a Redemption,
Termination, and Release Agreement, or the
Redemption Agreement, with our former advisor to purchase
the limited partner interest, including all rights with respect
to a subordinated distribution upon the occurrence of specified
liquidity events and other rights that our former advisor held
in our operating partnership. In addition, we have resolved all
remaining issues with our former advisor. In connection with the
execution of the Redemption Agreement, we made a one-time
payment to our former advisor of $8,000,000.
|
Company
Description
We are a self-managed, self-advised REIT. Accordingly, our
internal management team manages our
day-to-day
operations and oversees and supervises our employees and outside
service providers. Acquisitions and asset management services
are performed in-house by our employees, with certain monitored
services provided by third parties at market rates. We do not
pay acquisition, disposition or asset management fees to an
external advisor and we have not and will not pay any
internalization fees.
We provide stockholders the potential for income and growth
through investment in a diversified portfolio of real estate
properties. We focus primarily on medical office buildings and
healthcare related facilities. We also invest to a limited
extent in other real estate related assets. However, we do not
intend to invest more than 15.0% of our total assets in such
other real estate related assets. We focus primarily on
investments that produce recurring income. We qualified and
elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes
and we intend to continue to be taxed as a REIT for the
foreseeable future. We conduct substantially all of our
operations through Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP, or
our operating partnership.
In 2009, we implemented a customized property management
structure aimed at improving property operational performance at
the asset and service provider levels, including the elimination
of oversight fees, and a company-directed leasing plan to
optimize occupancy levels. Accordingly, we engaged nationally
recognized property management groups each to manage a specific
region beginning September 1, 2009 and reduced the fees we
pay for property management services by more than 50%. Our
property management and leasing services are overseen
internally, with designated services provided by management
companies selected and monitored by us. Each of the following
management companies manages a specific geographic region: CB
Richard Ellis, PM Realty Group, Hokanson Companies, The Plaza
Companies, and Nath Companies.
Realty Capital Securities, or RCS, an unaffiliated third party,
serves as our dealer manager. RCS is registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, and all 50 states.
RCS has agreements with an extensive network of broker dealers
with approximately 250 selling relationships providing access to
over 77,000 licensed registered representatives as of
September 30, 2010.
On September 20, 2006, we commenced our initial public
offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered up to
200,000,000 shares of our common stock for $10.00 per share
and up to 21,052,632 shares of our common
41
stock pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, or the
DRIP, at $9.50 per share, aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. The
initial offering expired on March 19, 2010. As of
March 19, 2010, we had received and accepted subscriptions
in our initial offering for 147,562,354 shares of our
common stock, or $1,474,062,00, excluding shares of our common
stock issued under the DRIP.
On March 19, 2010, we commenced a best efforts public
offering, or our follow-on offering, in which we are offering up
to 200,000,000 shares of our common stock at $10.00 per
share in our primary offering and up to 21,052,632 shares
of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP at $9.50 per share. As
of November 11, 2010, we had received and accepted
subscriptions in our follow-on offering for
39,920,897 shares of our common stock, or $398,896,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
On August 16, 2010, we announced our intention to close our
follow-on offering early, subject to market conditions, on or
before April 30, 2011 but not earlier than
November 30, 2010, with
30-day prior
notice. Our follow-on offering is currently scheduled to expire
on March 19, 2012, unless extended. We will not terminate
our follow-on offering early unless and until we determine that
an early termination is in the best interests of our
stockholders and market conditions are favorable.
As of September 30, 2010, we had made 70 acquisitions,
which include 58 medical office properties, seven
healthcare-related facilities, three quality commercial office
properties, and two other real estate-related assets. These
acquisitions comprise 208 buildings with approximately
8,943,000 square feet of GLA, for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $1,803,056,000 located in 23 states.
Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30,
2010, we purchased the remaining 20% interest we did not
previously own in the JV Company that owns the Chesterfield
Rehabilitation Center.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we
had funds from operations, or FFO, of $20,371,000 and
$3,092,000, respectively, MFFO of $21,390,000 and $11,869,000,
respectively, and net operating income, or NOI, of $34,659,000
and $21,254,000, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, we had FFO of $55,931,000 and
$18,504,000, respectively, MFFO of $63,782,000 and $31,322,000,
respectively, and NOI of $97,990,000 and $59,188,000,
respectively. FFO, MFFO and NOI are non-GAAP financial measures.
For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to our
GAAP financial statements, see the sections entitled Funds
from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations and
Net Operating Income in this Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Our principal executive offices are located at
16435 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 320, Scottsdale,
Arizona, 85254 and the telephone number is
(480) 998-3478.
For investor services, contact DST Systems, Inc. by telephone at
(888) 801-0107.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The complete listing of our Critical Accounting Policies was
previously disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report, and there have
been no material changes to our Critical Accounting Policies as
disclosed therein.
Interim
Unaudited Financial Data
Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared by us in accordance with GAAP in
conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain
information and footnote disclosures required for annual
financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to
SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, our accompanying interim
condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. Our accompanying interim condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which
are, in our opinion, of a normal recurring nature and necessary
for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim period. Interim
results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year; such results may be
less favorable. Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in our 2009 Annual Report.
42
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements,
to our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements,
for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Acquisitions
Completed During the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2010
See Note 3, Real Estate Investments
Acquisitions, to our accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements, for a listing of the properties acquired
and the dates of acquisition.
Acquisitions
Completed Subsequent to September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
On October 29, 2010, we completed the acquisition of a
228,900 square foot Class A medical office building
located less than one mile from Allegheny General Hospital, a
flagship hospital in the West Penn Allegheny Health System, in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The building is currently 100% leased
and was purchased for approximately $39,000,000.
|
|
|
|
On November 12, 2010, we purchased a multi-tenant medical
office building located in Raleigh, North Carolina for
$16,500,000. This building consists of 89,000 square feet
and is currently over 98.2% occupied.
|
|
|
|
On November 12, 2010, we purchased an additional medical
office building within our Rendina portfolio for $14,034,000.
This building, located in St. Louis, Missouri, consists of
48,009 square feet and has an occupancy rate of over 96%.
|
Pending
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
On August 12, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale
agreements to purchase two medical office buildings within a
medical office portfolio located in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
One of the buildings within this portfolio was purchased during
the three months ended September 30, 2010 for $9,560,000
and is further described in Note 16, Business Combinations.
The second building, the purchase price for which is
approximately $6,232,000, consists of 19,290 square feet
and is 100% occupied.
|
|
|
|
On September 4, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale
agreements to purchase two additional medical office buildings
within the Rendina portfolio. These buildings, located in
Tucson, Arizona and Wellington, Florida, comprise a total of
approximately 108,151 square feet and each have an
occupancy rate of 100%. The aggregate purchase price associated
with these two medical office buildings is $29,174,000.
|
|
|
|
On October 5, 2010, we signed purchase and sale agreements
to acquire a portfolio of four medical office buildings located
in Phoenix, Arizona for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $60,753,000. This portfolio consists of 270,843
total square feet and has an aggregate occupancy of
approximately 98.3%.
|
|
|
|
On October 22, 2010, we entered into purchase and sale
agreements to acquire a portfolio of nine medical office
buildings located in Albany and Carmel, New York, North Adams,
Massachusetts, and Temple Terrace, Florida for approximately
$196,645,000. The total portfolio consists of approximately
959,893 square feet and has an aggregate occupancy of 98%.
|
|
|
|
On November 11, 2010, we signed a purchase and sale
agreement to acquire a 220,000 square foot portfolio
consisting of four long-term acute care hospitals located in
Augusta, Georgia, Orlando and Tallahassee, Florida, and Dallas,
Texas. These buildings, the aggregate purchase price for which
is $99,000,000, are each 100% occupied.
|
The completion of the pending acquisitions described above is
subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions, and we
cannot guarantee that these acquisitions will be completed.
43
Status of
Our Offering
As of November 11, 2010, we had received and accepted
subscriptions in our initial and follow-on offerings for
187,483,251 shares of our common stock, or $1,872,958,000,
excluding shares of our common stock issued under the DRIP.
Financing
Unsecured
Credit Facility
On October 13, 2010, we entered into a credit agreement
with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as
syndication agents, and the lenders named therein to obtain an
unsecured revolving credit facility in an aggregate maximum
principal amount of $200,000,000, subject to increase. This
credit facility replaced our previous secured credit facility.
It has an initial term of 12 months with two three-month
extensions available, subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions.
The credit agreement contains various affirmative and negative
covenants that we believe are usual for facilities and
transactions of this type, including limitations on the
incurrence of debt by us, our operating partnership and its
subsidiaries that own unencumbered assets, limitations on the
nature of our operating partnerships business, and
limitations on distributions by our operating partnership and
its subsidiaries that own unencumbered assets. Additionally, the
credit agreement contains various financial covenants for us and
our operating partnership, as applicable, including a maximum
ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value and minimum
ratios of unencumbered asset value to total commitments, of
EBITDA to fixed charges, and of tangible net worth. With this
credit facility, we will have the ability to timely utilize
corporate-level debt, if and when needed, for strategic
acquisitions and other corporate purposes.
Secured
Term Loan Commitment
On November 3, 2010, we obtained a commitment, subject to
certain customary conditions to closing, from Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. for a senior secured real estate term loan in the maximum
amount of $135,000,000. The purpose of this facility is to
provide proceeds to be used for the repayment of the six Wells
Fargo Bank loans totaling approximately $99,000,000, with excess
proceeds to be used to finance additional office and medical
office buildings that are held as collateral. Interest shall be
payable monthly at a rate of one-month LIBOR plus 2.35%. The
facility has an initial term of 36 months and includes two
12-month
extension options, subject to the satisfaction of certain
conditions. Financial covenant thresholds and definitions for
the secured term loan facility will mirror those contained
within our unsecured credit facility agented by JP Morgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as detailed in the preceding section. In addition,
the credit agreement for this secured term loan will include
events of default that we believe are usual for facilities and
transactions of this type. The completion of the secured term
loan described above is subject to the satisfaction of a number
of conditions, and, as such, we cannot guarantee completion.
On November 3, 2010, we also purchased an interest rate
swap with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as counterparty for a notional
amount of $75,000,000. The interest rate swap is secured by the
pool of assets collateralizing the secured term loan. The
effective date of the swap is March 1, 2011, and its
termination date of December 31, 2013 coincides with the
initial term of the secured term loan. The swap will fix the
LIBOR portion of our monthly interest payments at 1.085%,
thereby effectively fixing our all-in interest rate on the
secured term loan at 3.435%.
Entry
into Redemption, Termination and Release Agreement
On October 18, 2010, we entered into the
Redemption Agreement with our former sponsor, our former
advisor, our former dealer manager, and certain of their
affiliates, or the Grubb related parties. Pursuant to the
Redemption Agreement, we purchased the limited partner
interest, including all rights with respect to a subordinated
distribution upon the occurrence of specified liquidity events
and other rights held by our former advisor in our operating
partnership. For more information regarding the subordinated
distribution right that was
44
purchased, see Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in
our 2009 Annual Report. In addition, we and the Grubb related
parties resolved all remaining issues between the parties. In
connection with the execution of the Redemption Agreement,
we made a one-time payment to the Grubb related parties of
$8,000,000. We believe that the execution of the
Redemption Agreement represents the final stage of our
successful transition from Grubb & Ellis and that the
Redemption Agreement further positions us to take advantage
of potential strategic opportunities in the future.
Factors
Which May Influence Results of Operations
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, other
than national economic conditions affecting real estate
generally, that may reasonably be expected to have a material
impact, favorable or unfavorable, on revenues or income from the
acquisition, management and operation of properties other than
those listed in Part II, Item 1A of this report and
those Risk Factors previously disclosed in our 2009 Annual
Report.
Rental
Income
The amount of rental income generated by our properties depends
principally on our ability to maintain the occupancy rates of
currently leased space and to lease currently available space
and space available from unscheduled lease terminations at the
existing rental rates. Negative trends in one or more of these
factors could adversely affect our rental income in future
periods.
Offering
Proceeds
If we fail to continue to raise proceeds under our follow-on
offering, we will be limited in our ability to invest in a
diversified real estate portfolio which could result in
increased exposure to local and regional economic downturns and
the poor performance of one or more of our properties and,
therefore, expose our stockholders to increased risk. In
addition, some of our general and administrative expenses are
fixed regardless of the size of our real estate portfolio.
Therefore, depending on the amount of offering proceeds we
raise, we would expend a larger portion of our income on
operating expenses. This would reduce our profitability and, in
turn, the amount of net income available for distribution to our
stockholders.
Scheduled
Lease Expirations
As of September 30, 2010, our consolidated properties were
approximately 91% occupied. Over the next 12 months, for
the period ending September 30, 2011, leases representing
8.15% of the occupied GLA will expire. Our leasing strategy for
the next 12 months focuses on negotiating renewals for
leases scheduled to expire during the remainder of the year. If
we are unable to negotiate such renewals, we will try to
identify new tenants or collaborate with existing tenants who
are seeking additional space to occupy. Of the leases expiring
over the next 12 months, we anticipate, but can provide no
assurance, that a majority of the tenants will renew their
leases for another term.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and
2009
Our operating results are primarily comprised of income derived
from our portfolio of properties.
Except where otherwise noted, the change in our results of
operations is due to owning 208 buildings and two real estate
related asset as of September 30, 2010, as compared to
owning 154 buildings and one real estate related asset as of
September 30, 2009.
45
Rental
Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, rental
income was $50,847,000 as compared to $30,886,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2009. For the three months ended
September 30, 2010, rental income was primarily comprised
of base rent of $38,314,000 and expense recoveries of
$12,533,000. For the three months ended September 30, 2009,
rental income was primarily comprised of base rent of
$24,166,000 and expense recoveries of $6,720,000.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, rental income
was $139,640,000 as compared to $89,914,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, rental income was primarily comprised
of base rent of $106,521,000 and expense recoveries of
$33,119,000. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
rental income was primarily comprised of base rent of
$68,842,000 and expense recoveries of $21,072,000.
Rental
Expenses
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
rental expenses were $17,837,000 and $10,494,000, respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
rental expenses were $47,587,000 and $32,854,000, respectively.
Rental expenses consisted of the following for the periods then
ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
$
|
5,323,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,701,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,616,000
|
|
|
$
|
11,241,000
|
|
Building maintenance
|
|
|
3,990,000
|
|
|
|
2,090,000
|
|
|
|
11,434,000
|
|
|
|
6,647,000
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
4,721,000
|
|
|
|
2,204,000
|
|
|
|
10,625,000
|
|
|
|
6,445,000
|
|
Property management fees
|
|
|
679,000
|
(a)
|
|
|
734,000
|
(a)
|
|
|
1,967,000
|
(a)
|
|
|
2,506,000
|
(a)
|
Administration
|
|
|
1,041,000
|
|
|
|
776,000
|
|
|
|
3,056,000
|
|
|
|
2,402,000
|
|
Grounds maintenance
|
|
|
667,000
|
|
|
|
383,000
|
|
|
|
2,469,000
|
|
|
|
1,501,000
|
|
Non-recoverable operating expenses
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
345,000
|
|
|
|
2,180,000
|
|
|
|
1,210,000
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
342,000
|
|
|
|
227,000
|
|
|
|
931,000
|
|
|
|
729,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
174,000
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
309,000
|
|
|
|
173,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rental expenses
|
|
$
|
17,837,000
|
|
|
$
|
10,494,000
|
|
|
$
|
47,587,000
|
|
|
$
|
32,854,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
decrease in property management fees of $55,000 and $539,000
relative to the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively, is due to our ability to secure more
favorable property management contracts and to therefore realize
cost savings under our self-management structure throughout the
current year. |
General
and Administrative Expenses
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
general and administrative expense was $5,096,000 and
$3,979,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, general and
46
administrative expense was $12,781,000 and $9,072,000,
respectively. General and administrative expense consisted of
the following for the periods then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Professional and legal fees
|
|
|
965,000
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
711,000
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
2,330,000
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
2,410,000
|
|
|
(a)
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
282,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
1,097,000
|
|
|
(b)
|
Salaries and benefits
|
|
|
2,027,000
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
1,193,000
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
5,021,000
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
1,994,000
|
|
|
(c)
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
224,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
506,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
436,000
|
|
|
|
Directors and officers insurance premiums
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
409,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,000
|
|
|
|
Bank charges
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,000
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock compensation
|
|
|
514,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
543,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
879,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
660,000
|
|
|
|
Investor services
|
|
|
312,000
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
651,000
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
898,000
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
|
(d)
|
Postage
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,000
|
|
|
|
Corporate office overhead
|
|
|
318,000
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
118,000
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
1,252,000
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
286,000
|
|
|
(e)
|
Franchise & state taxes
|
|
|
(68,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,000
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
353,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
827,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,096,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,979,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,781,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,072,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in general and administrative expense of $1,117,000
and $3,799,000, respectively, for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, as compared to the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, was due to the following:
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The increase in professional and legal fees for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 of $254,000 as compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily due to
an increase in legal fees during the current quarter related to
the filing of our preliminary proxy as well as to the proposed
amendment of our charter as we continue to evaluate potential
future liquidity alternatives. In addition, we experienced an
increase in audit fees for our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The decrease in professional and legal fees for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 of $80,000 as compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 was due to a
year-to-date
decrease in one-time, non-recurring consulting and legal costs
of $675,000 incurred during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, for, among other things, our transition
to self-management. This decrease was offset by a $595,000
increase in audit fees following our transition to self
management for our Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(b) |
|
The decrease in bad debt expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 of $718,000, as compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 was also primarily due to
the
year-to-date
realization of performance efficiencies under our
self-management structure and experienced third-party property
management groups, which resulted in an increased collection
effort and improved tenant oversight. |
|
(c) |
|
The increase in salaries and benefits for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 of $834,000 and $3,027,000,
respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 was due to an increase in the number of
employees hired for self-management during 2009 and the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. We had 44 employees
as of September 30, 2010 as compared to 20 employees
as of September 30, 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
The decrease in investor services expense for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 of $339,000 as compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily due to
one-time transition costs incurred during the prior year
comparable quarter in conjunction with our transition to
self-management. Additionally, during the three months ended
September 30, 2009, we incurred approximately $200,000 in
proxy solicitation costs. For the current year, such proxy
solicitation costs will not be incurred until the fourth quarter
of 2010. The overall increase in investor services expense for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $127,000 was
due to the introduction and implementation of the latest state
of the art investor services platform provided by DST Systems,
Inc. This upgrade was done in conjunction with our transition to
self-management in the third quarter of 2009. These improved
investor services provide our stockholders and their financial
advisors with direct access to real-time information. In
addition to the increased expense driven by our transition to a
higher-quality investor services platform, our
year-to-date |
47
|
|
|
|
|
increase in expenses was also attributable to the increase in
the number of our stockholders and to printing costs associated
with our 2009 Annual Report. |
|
(e) |
|
The increase in corporate office overhead for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 of $200,000 and $966,000 is
attributable to the increase in size of our organization and
infrastructure resulting from being a fully self-managed company
throughout 2010 as compared to the prior year, in which we were
initially establishing our corporate office in Scottsdale,
Arizona. |
Asset
Management Fees
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
asset management fees were $0 and $1,196,000, respectively. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, asset
management fees were $0 and $3,783,000, respectively. The
decrease in asset management fees of $1,196,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and of $3,783,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 is due to our
transition to a self-managed cost structure. We no longer pay
asset management fees to our former advisor as the Advisory
Agreement expired on September 20, 2009. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010, we would have been
required to pay asset management fees of approximately
$4,356,000 and $12,195,000, respectively, to our former advisor
if we were still subject to the Advisory Agreement (under its
original terms).
Acquisition-Related
Expenses
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
acquisition-related expenses were $1,019,000 and $5,920,000,
respectively. The decrease in acquisition-related expenses is
due to a decrease in aggregate acquisition price as compared to
the prior year comparable quarter. For the three months ended
September 30, 2010, we made five acquisitions as well as
purchased an additional building within an existing portfolio
for an aggregate purchase price of $90,636,000, as compared to
acquisitions of one property at price of $162,820,000 for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. Additionally, we
have experienced a decrease in acquisition fees to our former
advisor. We paid $0 and $4,071,000 in acquisition fees to our
former advisor for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. For the three months ended
September 30, 2010, we would have been required to pay
acquisition fees of approximately $2,773,000 to our former
advisor if we were still subject to the Advisory Agreement
(under its original terms).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
acquisition-related expenses were $6,845,000 and $9,100,000,
respectively. The decrease in acquisition-related expenses is
primarily driven by a decrease in acquisition fees to our former
advisor. We paid $0 and $6,008,000 in acquisition fees to our
former advisor for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we would have been required to pay
acquisition fees of approximately $10,342,000 to our former
advisor if we were still subject to the Advisory Agreement
(under its original terms). The decrease is somewhat offset,
however, by our increased acquisition activity relative to the
prior year comparable period. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we completed 17 acquisitions as well as
purchased three additional medical office buildings within
existing portfolios. Additionally, we acquired the remaining 20%
interest in the JV Company that owns Chesterfield Rehabilitation
Center. These purchases were completed for an aggregate purchase
price of $342,745,000, as compared to an aggregate purchase
price of $240,324,000 for the acquisition of three properties
and three office condominiums related to an existing property in
our portfolio completed during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Depreciation
and Amortization
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
depreciation and amortization was $19,854,000 and $13,287,000,
respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, depreciation and
48
amortization was $55,767,000 and $39,231,000, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization consisted of the following for the
periods then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Depreciation of properties
|
|
$
|
12,516,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,178,000
|
|
|
$
|
34,923,000
|
|
|
$
|
23,390,000
|
|
Amortization of identified intangible assets
|
|
|
7,107,000
|
|
|
|
4,964,000
|
|
|
|
20,273,000
|
|
|
|
15,578,000
|
|
Amortization of lease commissions
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
136,000
|
|
|
|
509,000
|
|
|
|
247,000
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
19,854,000
|
|
|
$
|
13,287,000
|
|
|
$
|
55,767,000
|
|
|
$
|
39,231,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense and Gain on Derivative Instruments
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
interest expense and gain on derivative financial instruments
was $7,706,000 and $7,006,000, respectively, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, interest expense
and gain on derivative financial instruments was $21,900,000 and
$18,644,000, respectively. Interest expense and gain on
derivative financial instruments consisted of the following for
the periods then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Interest expense on our mortgage loans payable and derivative
instruments
|
|
$
|
8,031,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,493,000
|
|
|
$
|
24,663,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,269,000
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees associated with our
mortgage loans payable
|
|
|
379,000
|
|
|
|
374,000
|
|
|
|
1,131,000
|
|
|
|
1,117,000
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees associated with our
credit facility
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
235,000
|
|
|
|
286,000
|
|
Amortization of debt discount or premium
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
347,000
|
|
|
|
207,000
|
|
Unused credit facility fees
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
41,000
|
|
|
|
95,000
|
|
|
|
122,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
8,480,000
|
|
|
|
7,072,000
|
|
|
|
26,471,000
|
|
|
|
22,001,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
(774,000
|
)
|
|
|
(66,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,571,000
|
)
|
|
|
(3,357,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense and gain on derivative financial
instruments
|
|
$
|
7,706,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,006,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,900,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,644,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in interest expense for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009 was primarily due to an increase in
outstanding mortgage loans payable to $594,428,000 as of
September 30, 2010 compared to $452,041,000 as of
September 30, 2009. This increase was slightly offset by a
gain on derivative financial instruments due to a non-cash mark
to market net adjustment we made on our derivative financial
instruments of $774,000 during the three months ended
September 30, 2010. Additionally, during the three months
ended September 30, 2010, we terminated two of our interest
rate swap derivative financial instruments with an aggregate
notional amount of $27,200,000 in conjunction with our
prepayment of certain loan balances.
The increase in interest expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009 was primarily due to an increase in
average outstanding mortgage loans payable of $594,428,000 as of
September 30, 2010 compared to $452,041,000 as of
September 30, 2009. This increase was slightly offset by a
gain on derivative financial instruments due to a non-cash mark
to market net adjustment we made on our derivative financial
instruments of $4,571,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Additionally, during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, we terminated two of our interest
rate swap
49
derivative financial instruments with an aggregate notional
amount of $27,200,000 in conjunction with our prepayment of
certain loan balances.
We use interest rate swaps and interest rate caps in order to
minimize the impact to us of fluctuations in interest rates. To
achieve our objectives, we borrow at fixed rates and variable
rates. We also enter into derivative financial instruments such
as interest rate swaps and interest rate caps in order to
mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial
instrument. We do not enter into derivative or interest rate
transactions for speculative purposes. Derivatives not
designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage
our exposure to interest rate movements.
Interest
and Dividend Income
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, interest and
dividend income was $24,000 as compared to $60,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, interest and dividend income was
$74,000 as compared to $233,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, interest and dividend income was
related primarily to interest earned on our money market
accounts, whereas for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, interest and dividend income was
related primarily to interest earned on both our money market
accounts and our U.S. Treasury Bills. The decrease was
driven by a lower cash balance in conjunction with our not
owning any U.S. Treasury Bills for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We are dependent upon the net proceeds from our offerings, our
debt financing, and operating cash flows from properties to
conduct our activities. Our ability to raise funds through our
follow-on offering is dependent on general economic conditions,
general market conditions for REITs, and our operating
performance. The capital required to purchase real estate and
other real estate related assets is obtained from our offerings
and from any indebtedness that we may incur.
Our principal demands for funds continue to be for acquisitions
of real estate and other real estate related assets, to pay
operating expenses and principal and interest on our outstanding
indebtedness, and to make distributions to our stockholders.
Generally, cash needs for items other than acquisitions of real
estate and other real estate related assets continue to be met
from operations, borrowing, and the net proceeds of our
offerings. We believe that these cash resources will be
sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable
future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from
other than these sources within the next 12 months.
We evaluate potential additional investments and engage in
negotiations with real estate sellers, developers, brokers,
investment managers, lenders and others. Until we invest the
majority of the proceeds of our offerings in properties and
other real estate related assets, we may invest in short-term,
highly liquid or other authorized investments. Such short-term
investments will not earn significant returns, and we cannot
predict how long it will take to fully invest the proceeds in
real estate and other real estate related assets. The number of
properties we may acquire and other investments we will make
will depend upon the number of our shares of our common stock
sold in our offerings and the resulting amount of the net
proceeds available for investment. However, there may be a delay
between the sale of shares of our common stock and our
investments in real estate and real estate related assets, which
could result in a delay in the benefits to our stockholders, if
any, of returns generated from our investments operations.
When we acquire a property, we prepare a capital plan that
contemplates the estimated capital needs of that investment. In
addition to operating expenses, capital needs may also include
costs of refurbishment, tenant improvements, or other major
capital expenditures. The capital plan also sets forth the
anticipated sources of the necessary capital, which may include
a credit facility or other loan established with respect to the
investment, operating cash generated by the investment,
additional equity investments from us or joint venture partners
or,
50
when necessary, capital reserves. Any capital reserve would be
established from the gross proceeds of our offerings, proceeds
from sales of other investments, operating cash generated by
other investments or other cash on hand. In some cases, a lender
may require us to establish capital reserves for a particular
investment. The capital plan for each investment will be
adjusted through ongoing, regular reviews of our portfolio or as
necessary to respond to unanticipated additional capital needs.
Other
Liquidity Needs
In the event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due
to various factors, including, without limitation, the timing of
distributions or the timing of the collections of receivables,
we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of
secured or unsecured debt financing through one or more third
parties. We may also pay distributions from cash from capital
transactions, including, without limitation, the sale of one or
more of our properties.
As of September 30, 2010, we estimate that our expenditures
for capital improvements will require up to approximately
$5,329,000 for the remaining three months of 2010. As of
September 30, 2010, we had $6,991,000 of restricted cash in
loan impounds and reserve accounts for such capital
expenditures. We cannot provide assurance, however, that we will
not exceed these estimated expenditure and distribution levels
or be able to obtain additional sources of financing on
commercially favorable terms or at all.
If we experience lower occupancy levels, reduced rental rates,
reduced revenues as a result of asset sales, or increased
capital expenditures and leasing costs compared to historical
levels due to competitive market conditions for new and renewal
leases, the effect would be a reduction of net cash provided by
operating activities. If such a reduction of net cash provided
by operating activities is realized, we may have a cash flow
deficit in subsequent periods. Our estimate of net cash
available is based on various assumptions which are difficult to
predict, including the levels of leasing activity and related
leasing costs. Any changes in these assumptions could impact our
financial results and our ability to fund working capital and
unanticipated cash needs.
Cash
Flows
Cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, were $49,623,000 and
$15,968,000, respectively. Cash flows from operations were
reduced by $6,845,000 and $9,100,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for
acquisition-related expenses. Acquisition-related expenses were
previously capitalized as a part of the purchase price
allocations and have historically been included in cash flows
from investing activities. Excluding such acquisition-related
expenses, cash flows from operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 would have been $56,468,000 and
$25,068,000, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, cash flows provided by operating
activities related primarily to operations from our 68
properties and two real estate related assets. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, cash flows provided by
operating activities related primarily to operations from our 44
properties and one real estate related asset. We anticipate cash
flows from operating activities to continue to increase as we
purchase more properties.
Cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, were $304,113,000 and
$255,256,000, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, cash flows used in investing activities
related primarily to the acquisition of real estate operating
properties in the amount of $277,980,000. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, cash flows used in investing
activities related primarily to the acquisition of real estate
operating properties in the amount of $241,668,000. We
anticipate cash flows used in investing activities to increase
as we purchase more properties.
Cash flows provided by financing activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, were $256,675,000 and
$432,748,000, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, cash flows provided by financing
activities related primarily to funds raised from investors in
the amount of $380,255,000 and borrowings on mortgage loans
payable of $79,125,000, the payment of offering costs of
$38,580,000 for our offerings, distributions of $42,870,000 and
principal and demand note repayments of $83,810,000 on mortgage
loans payable. Additional cash outflows related to our purchase
of the noncontrolling interest in the JV Company
51
that owns Chesterfield Rehabilitation Center for $3,900,000 as
well as to debt financing costs of $2,328,000. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, cash flows provided by
financing activities related primarily to funds raised from
investors in the amount of $533,303,000 and borrowings on
mortgage loans payable of $1,696,000 the payment of offering
costs of $56,382,000, distributions of $27,493,000 and principal
repayments of $10,624,000 on mortgage loans payable. Additional
cash outflows related to debt financing costs of $60,000. We
anticipate cash flows from financing activities to increase in
the future as we raise additional funds from investors and incur
additional debt to purchase properties.
Distributions
The amount of the distributions we pay to our stockholders is
determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a
number of factors, including funds available for payment of
distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure
requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to
maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended.
Our board of directors approved a 6.50% per annum, or $0.65 per
common share, distribution to be paid to our stockholders
beginning on January 8, 2007, the date we reached our
minimum offering of $2,000,000. The first distribution was paid
on February 15, 2007 for the period ended January 31,
2007. Thereafter, distributions were paid each month in respect
of the distributions declared for the prior month. On
February 14, 2007, our board of directors approved a 7.25%
per annum, or $0.725 per common share, distribution to be paid
to our stockholders beginning with our February
2007 monthly distribution, which was paid in March 2007,
and we continued to pay distributions at that rate through
September 30, 2010. It is our intent to continue to pay
distributions. However, we cannot guarantee the amount of
distributions paid in the future, if any.
If distributions are in excess of our taxable income, such
distributions will result in a return of capital to our
stockholders. Our distributions of amounts in excess of our
taxable income have resulted in a return of capital to our
stockholders.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we paid
distributions of $83,426,000 ($42,870,000 in cash and
$40,556,000 in shares of our common stock pursuant to the DRIP),
as compared to cash flow from operations of $49,623,000. Cash
flows from operations were reduced by $6,845,000 and $9,100,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, for acquisition-related expenses.
Acquisition-related expenses were previously capitalized as a
part of the purchase price allocations and have historically
been included in cash flows from investing activities. Excluding
such acquisition-related expenses the comparable cash flows from
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 would have been $56,468,000 and $25,068,000, respectively.
From inception through September 30, 2010, we paid
cumulative distributions of $195,523,000 ($100,635,000 in cash
and $94,888,000 in shares of our common stock pursuant to the
DRIP), as compared to cumulative cash flows from operations of
$98,306,000. Comparable cumulative cash flows from operations
would have totaled $121,148,000 under previous accounting rules
that allowed for capitalization of acquisition-related expenses
which would therefore have been included in cash flows from
investing. The distributions paid in excess of our cash flow
from operations during the nine months ended September 30,
2010 were paid using the proceeds of debt financing.
For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, our
FFO was $20,371,000 and $3,092,000, respectively. As more fully
described below under Funds from Operations and Modified
Funds from Operations, FFO was reduced by $1,019,000 and
$8,777,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 for certain one-time, non-recurring charges and
acquisition-related expenses, as applicable. For the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 we paid
distributions of $30,156,000 and $21,908,000 respectively. For
the three months ended September 30, 2010, the portion of
our distributions that was paid in cash was fully covered by our
FFO of $20,371,000. Excluding one-time charges and
acquisition-related costs, as applicable, FFO would have been
$21,390,000 and $11,869,000 at September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, our
FFO was $55,931,000 and $18,504,000, respectively. As more fully
described below under Funds from Operations and Modified
Funds from Operations, FFO was reduced by $7,851,000 and
$12,818,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 for certain one-time, non-recurring charges and
acquisition-related expenses, as applicable. For the nine months
ended
52
September 30, 2010 and 2009 we paid distributions of
$83,426,000 and $54,159,000 respectively. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, the portion of our distributions
that was paid in cash was fully covered by our FFO of
$55,931,000. Excluding one-time charges and acquisition-related
costs, as applicable, FFO would have been $63,782,000 and
$31,322,000, respectively.
Financing
We anticipate that our aggregate borrowings, both secured and
unsecured, will not exceed 60.0% of all of our properties
and other real estate related assets combined fair market
values, as determined at the end of each calendar year. For
these purposes, the fair market value of each asset will be
equal to the purchase price paid for the asset or, if the asset
was appraised subsequent to the date of purchase, then the fair
market value will be equal to the value reported in the most
recent independent appraisal of the asset. Our policies do not
limit the amount we may borrow with respect to any individual
investment. As of September 30, 2010, our aggregate
borrowings were 29.8% of our total assets. Of the $79,197,000 of
mortgage notes payable maturing in 2010, $39,153,000 have two
one-year extensions available and $29,101,000 have a one-year
extension available. Of the $173,111,000 of mortgage notes
payable maturing in 2011, $153,310,000 have two one-year
extensions available. Additionally, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we paid off debt with an aggregate
principal balance of $66,500,000. See Note 19, Subsequent
Events, for information concerning our $135,000,000 secured term
loan financing commitment, subject to certain customary
conditions to closing, with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. We obtained
this commitment, which serves to refinance $17,200,000 of debt
maturing in 2010 and approximately $82,000,000 of debt maturing
in 2011, on November 3, 2010. Additionally, see
Note 19, Subsequent Events, for information regarding
$29,101,000 of debt that was paid off upon its reaching maturity
on October 1, 2010 as well as our receipt of a one-year
extension on $22,000,000 of our debt that was originally
scheduled to mature on December 30, 2010.
Our charter precludes us from borrowing in excess of 300% of the
value of our net assets, unless approved by a majority of our
independent directors and the justification for such excess
borrowing is disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly
report. For purposes of this determination, net assets are our
total assets, other than intangibles, calculated at cost before
deducting depreciation, bad debt and other similar non-cash
reserves, less total liabilities and computed at least quarterly
on a consistently-applied basis. Generally, the preceding
calculation is expected to approximate 75.0% of the sum of the
aggregate cost of our real estate and real estate related assets
before depreciation, amortization, bad debt and other similar
non-cash reserves. As of September 30, 2010, our leverage
did not exceed 300% of the value of our net assets.
Mortgage
Loans Payable, Net
See Note 7, Mortgage Loans Payable, Net, to our
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, for a
further discussion of our mortgage loans payable, net.
Revolving
Credit Facility
See Note 9, Revolving Credit Facility, to our accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements, for a further
discussion of our credit facility.
REIT
Requirements
In order to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, we are required to make distributions to our
stockholders of at least 90.0% of REIT taxable income. In the
event that there is a shortfall in net cash available due to
factors including, without limitation, the timing of such
distributions or the timing of the collections of receivables,
we may seek to obtain capital to pay distributions by means of
secured debt financing through one or more third parties. We may
also pay distributions from cash from capital transactions
including, without limitation, the sale of one or more of our
properties.
53
Commitments
and Contingencies
See Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies, to our
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, for a
further discussion of our commitments and contingencies.
Debt
Service Requirements
One of our principal liquidity needs is the payment of principal
and interest on outstanding indebtedness. As of
September 30, 2010, we had fixed and variable rate mortgage
loans payable in the principal amount of $594,428,000, which
includes a premium of $2,084,000, outstanding secured by our
properties. We are required by the terms of the applicable loan
documents to meet certain financial covenants, such as minimum
net worth and liquidity amount, and reporting requirements.
Noncompliance with such covenants could be considered an event
of default and could require repayment of the outstanding
balance of the loan. As of September 30, 2010, we believe
that we were in compliance with all such covenants and
requirements on $534,344,000 of our mortgage loans payable, and
we are working with lenders, including maintaining a deposit of
$12,036,000 within a restricted collateral account, in order to
comply with certain covenants on the remaining $58,000,000 of
our mortgage loans. As of September 30, 2010, we had
voluntarily terminated the secured revolving credit facility
that we had initially opened on September 10, 2007 and had
modified on December 12, 2007. On October 13, 2010, we
and Healthcare Trust of America Holdings, LP, our operating
partnership, entered into a credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and
Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., as syndication agents, and the
lenders named therein to obtain an unsecured revolving credit
facility in an aggregate maximum principal amount of
$200,000,000. See Note 19, Subsequent Events, for
additional discussion of this new credit facility.
As of September 30, 2010, the weighted average interest
rate on our outstanding debt was 4.50% per annum.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet
transactions, nor do we currently have any such arrangements or
obligations.
Inflation
We are exposed to inflation risk as income from future long-term
leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations.
There are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that
protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions
include rent steps, reimbursement billings for operating expense
pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance
reimbursements on a per square foot allowance. However, due to
the long-term nature of the leases, among other factors, the
leases may not re-set frequently enough to cover inflation.
Funds
from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate
companies, the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts, or NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a
measure known as Funds from Operations, or FFO, which it
believes more accurately reflects the operating performance of a
REIT such as us. FFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss
as determined under GAAP.
We define FFO, a non-GAAP financial measure, consistent with the
standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the
Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004, or
the White Paper. The White Paper defines FFO as net income or
loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses
from sales of property but including asset impairment write
downs, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments
for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments
for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are
calculated to reflect FFO.
54
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets
requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and
improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets
diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values
historically rise and fall with market conditions, presentations
of operating results for a REIT, using historical accounting for
depreciation, could be less informative. The use of FFO is
recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance
measure.
Presentation of this information is intended to assist the
reader in comparing the operating performance of different
REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate
FFO the same way, so comparisons with other REITs may not be
meaningful. Factors that impact FFO include non cash GAAP income
and expenses,
one-time non
recurring costs, timing of acquisitions, yields on cash held in
accounts, income from portfolio properties and other portfolio
assets, interest rates on acquisition financing and operating
expenses. Furthermore, FFO is not necessarily indicative of cash
flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered
as an alternative to net income, as an indication of our
liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our
cash needs, including our ability to make distributions and
should be reviewed in connection with other measurements as an
indication of our performance. Our FFO reporting complies with
NAREITs policy described above.
Changes in the accounting and reporting rules under GAAP have
prompted a significant increase in the amount of non-cash and
non-operating items included in FFO, as defined. Therefore, we
use modified funds from operations, or MFFO, which excludes from
FFO one-time, non recurring charges, and acquisition-related
expenses to further evaluate our operating performance. We
believe that MFFO with these adjustments, like those already
included in FFO, are helpful as a measure of operating
performance because it excludes costs that management considers
more reflective of investing activities or non-operating
changes. We believe that MFFO reflects the overall operating
performance of our real estate portfolio, which is not
immediately apparent from reported net loss. As such, we believe
MFFO, in addition to net loss and cash flows from operating
activities, each as defined by GAAP, is a meaningful
supplemental performance measure and is useful in understanding
how our management evaluates our ongoing operating performance.
Management considers the following items in the calculation of
MFFO:
Acquisition-related expenses: Prior to 2009,
acquisition-related expenses were capitalized and have
historically been added back to FFO over time through
depreciation; however, beginning in 2009, acquisition-related
expenses related to business combinations are expensed. These
acquisition-related expenses are funded from the proceeds of our
debt financing and offerings and not from operations. We believe
by excluding expensed acquisition-related expenses, MFFO
provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for
our real estate investments.
Transition charges: FFO includes certain charges
related to the cost of our transition to self-management. These
items include, but are not limited to, additional professional
expenses and system conversion costs (including updates to
certain estimate development procedures) as well as
non-recurring employment costs. Because MFFO excludes such
costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental
information by focusing on the changes in our fundamental
operations that will be comparable rather than on such
transition charges. We do not believe such costs will recur
after our transition to a
self-management
infrastructure is complete.
55
The following is the calculation of FFO and MFFO for the three
months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,008,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10,074,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization consolidated properties
|
|
|
19,854,000
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
13,287,000
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest of
limited partners
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization related to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(616,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
20,371,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,092,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
1,019,000
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
5,920,000
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Transition charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,857,000
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFFO attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
21,390,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,869,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFFO per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
166,281,800
|
|
|
|
166,281,800
|
|
|
|
124,336,078
|
|
|
|
124,336,078
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
166,480,852
|
|
|
|
166,480,852
|
|
|
|
124,336,078
|
|
|
|
124,336,078
|
|
The following is the calculation of FFO and MFFO for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
771,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(20,409,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization consolidated properties
|
|
|
55,767,000
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
39,231,000
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest of
limited partners
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization related to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(667,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
55,931,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,504,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition expenses
|
|
|
6,845,000
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
9,100,000
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
Transition charges
|
|
|
1,006,000
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
3,718,000
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFFO attributable to controlling interest
|
|
$
|
63,782,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,322,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MFFO per share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
155,480,689
|
|
|
|
155,480,689
|
|
|
|
105,257,482
|
|
|
|
105,257,482
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
155,679,741
|
|
|
|
155,679,741
|
|
|
|
105,257,482
|
|
|
|
105,257,482
|
|
56
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, FFO
and MFFO per share have been impacted by the increase in net
proceeds realized from our existing offering of shares. For the
three months ended September 30, 2010, we sold
17,486,496 shares of our common stock, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, we sold
38,890,967 shares of our common stock. As such, we have
increased our outstanding shares by approximately 29% since
December 31, 2009.
Net
Operating Income
Net operating income is a non-GAAP financial measure that is
defined as net income (loss), computed in accordance with GAAP,
generated from properties before interest expense, general and
administrative expenses, depreciation, amortization and interest
and dividend income. We believe that net operating income
provides an accurate measure of the operating performance of our
operating assets because net operating income excludes certain
items that are not associated with management of the properties.
Additionally, we believe that net operating income is a widely
accepted measure of comparative operating performance in the
real estate community. However, our use of the term net
operating income may not be comparable to that of other real
estate companies as they may have different methodologies for
computing this amount.
To facilitate understanding of this financial measure, a
reconciliation of net income (loss) to net operating income has
been provided for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,008,000
|
|
|
$
|
(10,074,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
771,000
|
|
|
$
|
(20,409,000
|
)
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
5,096,000
|
|
|
|
3,979,000
|
|
|
|
12,781,000
|
|
|
|
9,072,000
|
|
Acquisition-related expenses
|
|
|
1,019,000
|
|
|
|
5,920,000
|
|
|
|
6,845,000
|
|
|
|
9,100,000
|
|
Asset management fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,196,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,783,000
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19,854,000
|
|
|
|
13,287,000
|
|
|
|
55,767,000
|
|
|
|
39,231,000
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
7,706,000
|
|
|
|
7,006,000
|
|
|
|
21,900,000
|
|
|
|
18,644,000
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
(24,000
|
)
|
|
|
(60,000
|
)
|
|
|
(74,000
|
)
|
|
|
(233,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
$
|
34,659,000
|
|
|
$
|
21,254,000
|
|
|
$
|
97,990,000
|
|
|
$
|
59,188,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent
Events
See Note 19, Subsequent Events, to our accompanying
condensed consolidated financial statements, for a further
discussion of our subsequent events.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
There were no material changes in the information regarding
market risk that was provided in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2010, other than the
updates discussed within this item.
57
The table below presents, as of September 30, 2010, the
principal amounts and weighted average interest rates by year of
expected maturity to evaluate the expected cash flows and
sensitivity to interest rate changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fixed rate debt - principal payments
|
|
$
|
1,094,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,855,000
|
|
|
$
|
19,789,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,373,000
|
|
|
$
|
47,746,000
|
|
|
$
|
236,675,000
|
|
|
$
|
328,532,000
|
|
|
$
|
355,443,000
|
|
Weighted average interest rate on maturing debt
|
|
|
5.80
|
%
|
|
|
5.81
|
%
|
|
|
6.56
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
|
6.43
|
%
|
|
|
5.64
|
%
|
|
|
5.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt - principal payments
|
|
$
|
79,957,000
|
|
|
$
|
173,024,000
|
|
|
$
|
914,000
|
|
|
$
|
927,000
|
|
|
$
|
193,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,797,000
|
|
|
$
|
263,812,000
|
|
|
$
|
263,403,000
|
|
Weighted average interest rate on maturing debt (based on rates
in effect as of September 30, 2010)
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
|
3.33
|
%
|
|
|
6.42
|
%
|
|
|
5.74
|
%
|
|
|
6.40
|
%
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
2.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans payable were $592,344,000 ($594,428,000,
including premium) as of September 30, 2010. As of
September 30, 2010, we had fixed and variable rate mortgage
loans with effective interest rates ranging from 1.66% to 12.75%
per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of
4.50% per annum. We had $328,532,000 ($330,616,000, including
premium) of fixed rate debt, or 55.5% of mortgage loans payable,
at a weighted average interest rate of 6.05% per annum and
$263,812,000 of variable rate debt, or 44.5% of mortgage loans
payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 2.57% per annum.
In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our
future properties is subject to fluctuations based on changes in
local and regional economic conditions and changes in the
creditworthiness of tenants, which may affect our ability to
refinance our debt if necessary.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to us,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, who serves as our principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and
evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize
that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving
the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and
we necessarily were required to apply our judgment in evaluating
whether the benefits of the controls and procedures that we
adopt outweigh their costs.
As of September 30, 2010, an evaluation was conducted under
the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial
reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
58
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
None.
There are no other material changes from the risk factors
previously disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as filed with the SEC, on March 16, 2010, except as noted
below.
Some or all of the following factors may affect the returns we
receive from our investments, our results of operations, our
ability to pay distributions to our stockholders, availability
to make additional investments or our ability to dispose of our
investments.
We may
not have sufficient cash available from operations to pay
distributions, and, therefore, distributions may be paid with
offering proceeds or borrowed funds.
The amount of the distributions to our stockholders is
determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a
number of factors, including funds available for payment of
distributions, our financial condition, capital expenditure
requirements, and annual distribution requirements needed to
maintain our status as a REIT. If our cash flow from operations
is less than the distributions our board of directors determines
to pay, we would be required to pay our distributions, or a
portion thereof, with proceeds from our offerings or borrowed
funds. As a result, the amount of proceeds available for
investment and operations would be reduced, or we may incur
additional interest expense as a result of borrowed funds.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we paid
distributions of $83,426,000 ($42,870,000 in cash and
$40,556,000 in shares of our common stock pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP), as compared to
cash flow from operations of $49,623,000. The remaining
$33,803,000 of distributions paid in excess of our cash flow
from operations, or 41%, was paid using the proceeds of debt
financing.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
Use of
Public Offering Proceeds
On September 20, 2006, we commenced our initial public
offering, or our initial offering, in which we offered a minimum
of 200,000 shares and a maximum of 200,000,000 shares
of our common stock for $10.00 per share and up to
21,052,632 shares of our common stock pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan, or the DRIP, for $9.50 per
share, aggregating up to $2,200,000,000. The shares offered were
registered with the SEC on a Registration Statement on
Form S-11
(File
No. 333-133652)
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which was declared
effective by the SEC on September 20, 2006. As of
March 19, 2010, the date upon which our initial offering
terminated, we had raised $1,474,062,000 in gross offering
proceeds from approximately 39,900 stockholders pursuant to our
initial offering.
On April 6, 2009, we filed a Registration Statement on
Form S-11
(File
No. 333-158418)
with the SEC with respect to our follow-on public offering, or
our follow-on offering, of up to 221,052,632 shares of our
common stock. The SEC declared our follow-on offering effective
on March 19, 2010, and we commenced this offering on that
date. Our follow-on offering includes up to
200,000,000 shares of our common stock offered for sale at
$10.00 per share in our primary offering and up to
21,052,632 shares of our common stock offered for sale
pursuant to the DRIP at $9.50 per share. As of
September 30, 2010, we had received and accepted
subscriptions for 28,283,902 shares of our common stock, or
$282,635,000, on our follow-on offering.
As of September 30, 2010, a total of $94,888,000 in
distributions was reinvested and 9,988,254 shares of our
common stock were issued under the DRIP.
59
As of September 30, 2010, we have incurred dealer manager
fees of $32,780,000 and $2,936,000, selling commissions of
$101,316,000 and $18,276,000, and due diligence expense
reimbursements of $1,311,000 and $769,000 related to our initial
offering and to our follow-on offering, respectively. We have
also incurred organizational and offering expenses of
$17,258,000 related to our initial offering and $6,323,000
related to our follow-on offering. Such fees and reimbursements
are charged to stockholders equity as such amounts are
paid from the gross proceeds of our offerings. The cost of
raising funds in our offerings as a percentage of funds raised
will not exceed 11.5%. Net offering proceeds for our initial
offering, after deducting these expenses, totaled $1,321,397,000.
As of September 30, 2010, we have used $1,274,371,000 in
net offering proceeds to complete our 70 acquisitions (including
two real estate related assets), to purchase the 20% remaining
interest in the JV Company that owns Chesterfield Rehabilitation
Center, to pay acquisition fees and expenses, and to repay debt
incurred in connection with such acquisitions.
Purchases
of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
Our share repurchase plan allows for share repurchases by us
when certain criteria are met by our stockholders. Share
repurchases will be made at the sole discretion of our board of
directors. Funds for the repurchase of shares of our common
stock will come exclusively from the proceeds we receive from
the sale of shares under the DRIP during the prior
12 months.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we
repurchased shares of our common stock as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
of Shares that May
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly
|
|
Yet be Purchased
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Average Price
|
|
Announced
|
|
Under the
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
Plan or Program(1)
|
|
Plans or Programs(2)
|
|
July 1, 2010 to July 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,216,328
|
|
|
$
|
9.55
|
|
|
|
1,216,328
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
August 1, 2010 to August 31, 2010
|
|
|
41,423
|
|
|
$
|
9.58
|
|
|
|
41,424
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
September 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our board of directors adopted a share repurchase plan, which
was publicly announced on September 20, 2006. Our board of
directors adopted an amended share repurchase plan, which was
publicly announced on August 25, 2008. Through
September 30, 2010, we had repurchased
5,151,988 shares of our common stock pursuant to our share
repurchase plan. Our share repurchase plan does not have an
expiration date but may be terminated at our board of
directors discretion. |
|
(2) |
|
Subject to funds being available, we will limit the number of
shares repurchased during any calendar year to 5.0% of the
weighted average number of our shares outstanding during the
prior calendar year. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the
signatures section of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q)
are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q.
60
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 15, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Scott D. Peters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Scott D. Peters
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman (Principal
executive officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 15, 2010
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Kellie S. Pruitt
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Kellie S. Pruitt
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer and
Principal accounting officer)
|
61
EXHIBIT INDEX
Following the consummation of the merger of NNN Realty Advisors,
Inc., which previously served as our sponsor, with and into a
wholly owned subsidiary of Grubb & Ellis Company on
December 7, 2007, NNN Healthcare/Office REIT, Inc., NNN
Healthcare/Office REIT Holdings, L.P., NNN Healthcare/Office
REIT Advisor, LLC, NNN Healthcare/Office Management, LLC, Triple
Net Properties, LLC and NNN Capital Corp. changed their names to
Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT, Inc., Grubb &
Ellis Healthcare REIT Holdings, LP Grubb & Ellis
Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC, Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
Management, LLC, Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC,
and Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc. respectively.
Following our transition to self-management on August 24,
2009, Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT, Inc. and
Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Holdings, LP changed
their names to Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. and Healthcare
Trust of America Holdings, LP, respectively. The following
Exhibit List refers to the entity names used at the time
the agreements or documents below were entered into in order to
accurately reflect the names of the parties on the documents
listed.
Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of
Regulation S-K,
this Exhibit Index immediately precedes the exhibits.
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by
reference, in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2010 (and are numbered
in accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Third Articles of Amendment and Restatement of NNN
Healthcare/Office REIT, Inc. (included as Exhibit 3.1 to
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and incorporated
herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of NNN Healthcare/Office REIT, Inc. (included as
Exhibit 3.2 to our Registration Statement on
Form S-11
(File
No. 333-133652)
filed on April 28, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amendment to the Bylaws of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
REIT, Inc., effective April 21, 2009 (included as
Exhibit 3.4 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to our
Registration Statement on
Form S-11
(File
No. 333-133652)
filed on April 21, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Articles of Amendment of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
REIT, Inc., effective August 24, 2009 (included as
Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Amendment to the Bylaws of Grubb & Ellis Healthcare
REIT, Inc., effective August 24, 2009 (included as
Exhibit 3.2 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed August 27, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
62