e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to .
Commission File Number 001-34571
PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
27-1055421
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2 Bethesda Metro Center, Suite 1530
Bethesda, Maryland
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
20814
(Zip Code) |
(240) 507-1300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at April 25, 2011 |
Common shares of beneficial interest ($0.01 par value per share) |
|
|
50,889,423 |
|
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2011 |
|
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
688,365 |
|
|
$ |
599,714 |
|
Ground lease asset, net |
|
|
10,666 |
|
|
|
10,721 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
340,592 |
|
|
|
220,722 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
6,215 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $37 and $13, respectively) |
|
|
8,162 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
23,220 |
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,080,330 |
|
|
$ |
855,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage debt |
|
|
252,390 |
|
|
|
143,570 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
16,773 |
|
|
|
15,799 |
|
Advance deposits |
|
|
3,173 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Distribution payable |
|
|
5,445 |
|
|
|
4,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
278,640 |
|
|
|
167,063 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares of beneficial interest, stated at liquidation preference $25 per share,
$.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 5,000,000 and 0 shares issued and outstanding
at March 31, 2011 and at December 31, 2010 respectively |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized;
39,846,355
and 39,839,859 issued and outstanding, respectively, at March 31, 2011 and 39,814,760
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
694,477 |
|
|
|
698,100 |
|
Accumulated deficit and distributions |
|
|
(19,964 |
) |
|
|
(11,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
799,771 |
|
|
|
686,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
801,690 |
|
|
|
688,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
1,080,330 |
|
|
$ |
855,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
$ |
25,559 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
14,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating department |
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
42,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
|
7,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
10,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other direct |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other indirect |
|
|
13,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
32,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and property insurance |
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ground rent |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
Hotel acquisition costs |
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
43,716 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(3,434 |
) |
|
|
(599 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(3,044 |
) |
|
|
(599 |
) |
Distributions to preferred shareholders |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,591 |
) |
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share attributable to common shareholders, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares, basic and diluted |
|
|
39,827,551 |
|
|
|
20,260,046 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,044 |
) |
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of ground lease |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income benefit |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash, net |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel receivables |
|
|
(4,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
Advance deposits |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of hotel properties, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(37,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Improvements and additions to hotel properties |
|
|
(9,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deposits on hotel properties |
|
|
(13,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in certificates of deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
Purchase of corporate office equipment, computer software, and furniture |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
Restricted cash, net |
|
|
(2,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(62,435 |
) |
|
|
(15,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from issuance of preferred shares |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of offering costs |
|
|
(4,023 |
) |
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Contributions from non-controlling interest |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage debt |
|
|
67,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of mortgage debt |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions common shares/units |
|
|
(4,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
182,122 |
|
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
119,870 |
|
|
|
(16,221 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
220,722 |
|
|
|
319,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
340,592 |
|
|
$ |
302,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (the Company) was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust
on October 2, 2009 to opportunistically acquire and invest in hotel properties located primarily in
major United States cities, with an emphasis on major coastal markets.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company owned nine hotels with a total of 2,552 guest rooms located
in the following markets: Atlanta (Buckhead), Georgia; Bethesda, Maryland; Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; Minneapolis, Minnesota; San Francisco, California; Santa Monica, California;
Stevenson, Washington; and Washington, D.C.
Substantially all of the Companys assets are held by, and all of the operations are conducted
through, Pebblebrook Hotel, L.P., (the Operating Partnership). The Company is the sole general
partner of the Operating Partnership. At March 31, 2011, the Company owned all of the common
Operating Partnership units issued by the Operating Partnership. For the Company to qualify as a
real estate investment trust (REIT) under the Internal Revenue Code, it cannot operate the hotels it owns. Therefore, its
Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries lease the hotel properties to subsidiaries of
Pebblebrook Hotel Lessee, Inc. (collectively, PHL), the Companys taxable REIT subsidiary
(TRS), which in turn engages third-party eligible independent contractors to manage the hotels.
PHL is consolidated into the Companys financial statements.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and in
conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
applicable to interim financial information. As such, certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These unaudited consolidated financial
statements include all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated
balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash flows for
the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year performance, as
the Company continues to deploy the net proceeds from its equity offerings to acquire hotel assets
and as a result of the impact of seasonal and other short-term variations. These consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries in accordance with U.S. GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods financial statements to conform
to the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported
results of operations or retained earnings.
The Companys comprehensive loss equals its net loss attributable to common shareholders and
the Company had no items classified as accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses. These estimates are
prepared using managements best judgment, after considering past, current and expected events and
economic conditions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Investment in Hotel Properties
Upon acquisition, the Company allocates the purchase price based on the fair value of the
acquired land, land improvements, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment, identifiable
intangible assets or liabilities, other assets and assumed liabilities. Identifiable intangible
assets or liabilities typically arise from contractual arrangement terms that are above or below
market compared to an estimated market agreement at the acquisition date. Acquisition-date fair
values of assets and assumed liabilities are determined based on replacement costs, appraised
values, and estimated fair values using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers and
that use appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information.
6
Acquisition costs are
expensed as incurred.
Hotel renovations and replacements of assets that improve or extend the life of the asset are
recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Furniture, fixtures and
equipment under capital leases are recorded at the present value of the minimum lease payments.
Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Hotel properties are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over an
estimated useful life of 15 to 40 years for buildings, land improvements, and building improvements
and one to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized
over the shorter of the lease term or the useful lives of the related assets. Intangible assets
arising from contractual arrangements are typically amortized over the life of the contract. The
Company is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives and classification of
properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation expense to reflect each year with
respect to the assets. These assessments may impact the Companys results of operations.
The Company reviews its investments in hotel properties for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be
recoverable. Events or circumstances that may cause a review include, but are not limited to, when
a hotel property experiences a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more
likely than not that a hotel property will be sold before the end of its useful life, adverse
changes in the demand for lodging at the properties due to declining national or local economic
conditions and/or new hotel construction in markets where the hotels are located. When such
conditions exist, the Company performs an analysis to determine if the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows from operations and the proceeds from the ultimate disposition of a hotel exceed
its carrying value. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying
amount of the asset, an adjustment to reduce the carrying amount to the related hotels estimated
fair market value is recorded and an impairment loss recognized. In the evaluation of impairment
of its hotel properties, the Company makes many assumptions and estimates including projected cash
flows both from operations and eventual disposition, expected useful life and holding period,
future required capital expenditures, and fair values, including consideration of capitalization
rates, discount rates, and comparable selling prices. The Company will adjust its assumptions with
respect to the remaining useful life of the hotel property when circumstances change or it is more
likely than not that the hotel property will be sold prior to its previously expected useful life.
The Company will classify a hotel as held for sale when a binding agreement to purchase the
property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable
cash, no significant financing contingencies exist, and the sale is expected to close within one
year. If these criteria are met and if the fair value less costs to sell is lower than the carrying
amount of the hotel, the Company will record an impairment loss and will cease recording
depreciation expense. The Company will classify the loss, together with the related operating
results, as discontinued operations on the statements of operations and classify the assets and
related liabilities as held for sale on the balance sheet.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of amounts derived from hotel operations, including the sales of rooms, food
and beverage, and other ancillary amenities. Revenue is recognized when rooms are occupied and
services have been rendered. The Company collects sales, use, occupancy and similar taxes at its
hotels which are presented on a net basis on the statement of operations.
Income Taxes
To qualify as a
REIT for federal income tax purposes, the
Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement
that it currently distribute at least 90 percent of its adjusted taxable income to its
shareholders. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax
on that portion of its taxable income that is currently distributed to shareholders. The Company
may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and to federal income
and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, the Companys wholly owned
taxable REIT subsidiary, which leases the Companys hotels from the Operating Partnership, is
subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset
and liability method under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Valuation allowances are provided
if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of
the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to
common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders as adjusted
for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
plus potentially dilutive securities. Any anti-dilutive securities are excluded from the diluted
per-share calculation.
7
Note 3. Acquisition of Hotel Properties
On February 16, 2011, the Company acquired the 252-room Argonaut Hotel located in San
Francisco, California for $84.0 million. The acquisition was funded with $42.0 million of
available cash and the assumption of a $42.0 million first mortgage loan. The hotel is subject to
a long-term ground lease agreement with the United States Department of the Interior that expires in 2059. The
hotel is required to pay the greater of a base rent of $1.2 million, as adjusted for consumer price
index CPI increases, or a percentage of rooms revenues, food and beverage revenues, and other
department revenues in excess of certain thresholds, as defined in the agreement. The fee as a
percentage of rooms revenues ranges from 8% to 12% in the initial years and 12% to 14% in the later
years. The fee as a percentage of food and beverage and other department revenues is 4% over the
term of the lease. The terms of the ground lease were evaluated and they were determined to
approximate current market terms. The Company retained Kimpton Hotels and Restaurants to manage the
hotel.
The allocation of fair value to the acquired assets and liabilities is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argonaut
Hotel |
|
Land |
|
$ |
|
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
79,492 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
4,247 |
|
In place lease assets |
|
|
190 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
71 |
|
Net working capital |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
84,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
The results of operations of the Argonaut Hotel
are included in the consolidated
statements of operations beginning on its acquisition date. The following unaudited pro forma
financial information presents the results of operations of the Company for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 as if the hotels acquired in 2010 and 2011 were acquired on January 1, 2010. The unaudited
pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be
indicative of either the results of operations that would have actually occurred had these
transactions occurred on January 1, 2010 or the future results of operations (in thousands, except
per-share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
44,049 |
|
|
$ |
41,760 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(7,195 |
) |
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
(8,868 |
) |
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
Note 4. Investment in Hotel Properties
Investment in hotel properties as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
106,428 |
|
|
$ |
106,428 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
545,507 |
|
|
|
460,988 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
46,829 |
|
|
|
37,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties |
|
$ |
698,764 |
|
|
$ |
605,382 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(10,399 |
) |
|
|
(5,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
688,365 |
|
|
$ |
599,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2011,
the Company acquired the Westin Gaslamp Quarter and Hotel Monaco Seattle hotels for $110.0 million and $51.2 million, respectively.
8
The Company currently has three properties under contract for an aggregate purchase price of
$263.5 million. The Company expects to fund these acquisitions with available cash. There can be
no assurance that the Company will complete these acquisitions.
Note 5. Debt
Senior Secured Credit Facility
On July 8, 2010, the Company entered into a $150.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility. The credit facility matures on July 7, 2013, and the Company has a one-year extension
option. The Company has the ability to increase the credit facility borrowings up to $200.0
million with lender approval. Borrowings on the credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 3% to
4%, depending on the Companys leverage ratio and subject to a LIBOR floor of 1.5%. Additionally,
the Company is required to pay an unused commitment fee at an annual rate of 0.50% of the unused
portion of the senior credit facility. The credit facility contains certain financial covenants
including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, and minimum net worth.
The Company incurred approximately $2.0 million in fees in connection with this credit facility
which are amortized over the term of the credit facility. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. As of March 31, 2011,
the Company was in compliance with the credit facility debt covenants. For the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company incurred unused commitment fees of $0.2 million and zero,
respectively.
Mortgage Debt
Each of the Companys mortgage loans is secured by a first-mortgage lien on the underlying
property. The mortgages are non-recourse to the Company except for fraud or misapplication of
funds.
On January 6, 2011, the Company entered into a first-mortgage loan on the Skamania Lodge. The
debt has a principal balance of $31.0 million, a term of five years, bears interest at 5.44% and
requires monthly principal and interest payments of $174,898.
On January 21, 2011, the Company entered into a first-mortgage loan on the DoubleTree by
Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC. The debt has a principal balance of $36.0 million, a term of five
years, bears interest at 5.28% and requires interest-only payments for the first twelve months and,
beginning in March 2012, will require monthly principal and interest payments of $199,407 through
February 2016, the maturity date.
In conjunction with the Companys acquisition of the Argonaut Hotel, the Company assumed a
$42.0 million interest-only first mortgage loan. The debt matures in March 2012 and has a fixed
annual interest rate of 5.67%.
Mortgage debt as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Outstanding as of |
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Maturity Date |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Sofitel Philadelphia (1) |
|
Floating |
|
February 2012 |
|
$ |
56,070 |
|
|
$ |
56,070 |
|
Monaco Washington DC |
|
5.68% |
|
March 2012 |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Argonaut Hotel |
|
5.67% |
|
March 2012 |
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental Buckhead |
|
4.88% |
|
January 2016 |
|
|
52,364 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
Skamania Lodge |
|
5.44% |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
30,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
DoubleTree by Hilton
Bethesda-Washington DC |
|
5.28% |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
252,390 |
|
|
$ |
143,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mortgage debt bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.3%. The interest rates as of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were 1.56% and 1.57% respectively. |
The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt
by discounting the future cash flows of each
instrument at estimated market rates.
Rates take into consideration general
market conditions and maturity. The estimated fair value of the Companys debt as of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010 was $251,435 and $143,911, respectively.
9
The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants as of March 31, 2011.
Note 6. Equity
Common Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest
(common shares), $.01 par value per share. Each outstanding common share entitles the holder to
one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Holders of the Companys common shares
are entitled to receive dividends when authorized by our board of trustees.
On March 15, 2011, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per common share. The
Company accrued $4.9 million for this dividend at March 31, 2011. The dividend was paid to
shareholders on April 15, 2011.
Preferred Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares, $.01 par value per
share.
On March 11, 2011, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of its 7.875% Series A Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Shares at a public offering price of $25.00 per share, for a total of
approximately $120.9 million of net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discount and other
offering-related costs. The Company had no preferred shares outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
On March 15, 2011, the Company declared a quarterly dividend on its 7.875% Series A Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Shares. The Company accrued $0.5 million for this dividend at March 31, 2011.
The dividend was paid to shareholders on April 15, 2011.
Treasury Shares
Treasury shares are accounted for under the cost method. During the three months ended March
31, 2011, the Company received 6,496 common shares in connection with executives and employees
surrendering shares to pay taxes at the time restricted shares vested. The Company had no treasury
shares as of December 31, 2010.
Operating Partnership Units
When issued, holders of Operating Partnership units will have certain redemption rights,
which will enable the unit holders to cause the Operating Partnership to redeem their units in
exchange for, at the Companys option, cash per unit equal to the market price of the Companys
common shares, at the time of redemption or for the Companys common shares on a one-for-one basis.
The number of shares issuable upon exercise of the redemption rights will be adjusted upon the
occurrence of share splits, mergers,
consolidations or similar pro-rata share transactions, which otherwise would have the effect
of diluting the ownership interests of our limited partners or our shareholders. As of March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no Operating Partnership units held by unaffiliated third
parties.
Note 7. Share-Based Compensation Plan
The Company maintains the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan to attract and retain independent
trustees, executive officers and other key employees and service providers. The plan provides for
the grant of options to purchase common shares, share awards, share appreciation rights,
performance units and other equity-based awards. Share awards under this plan generally vest over
three to five years. The Company pays dividends on unvested shares. Certain share awards may
provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control. As of March 31, 2011, there were
232,582 common shares available for issuance under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.
The following table provides a summary of restricted share activity as of March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
78,440 |
|
|
$ |
20.88 |
|
Granted |
|
|
71,065 |
|
|
|
22.15 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(22,709 |
) |
|
|
20.98 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2,232 |
) |
|
|
21.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
124,564 |
|
|
$ |
21.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each restricted share award is determined based on the closing price of the
Companys common shares on the grant date. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the
Company recognized approximately $0.2 million and $51
10
thousand, respectively, of share-based
compensation expense related to these restricted shares in the consolidated statements of
operations. As of March 31, 2011, there was $2.6 million of total unrecognized share-based
compensation expense related to unvested restricted shares. The unrecognized share-based
compensation expense is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining vesting
period of 2.5 years.
Long-Term Incentive Partnership Units
Long-Term Incentive Partnership ( LTIP) units, which are also referred to as profits
interest units, may be issued to eligible participants for the performance of services to or for
the benefit of the Operating Partnership. LTIP units are a class of partnership unit in the
Companys Operating Partnership and will receive, whether vested or not, the same per-unit profit
distributions as the other outstanding units in the Operating Partnership, which equal per-share
distributions on common shares. Initially, LTIP units have a capital account balance of zero, do
not receive an allocation of net income (loss) and do not have full parity with the common
Operating Partnership units with respect to liquidating distributions. If such parity is reached,
vested LTIP units may be converted, at any time, into an equal number of common Operating
Partnership units and thereafter will possess all of the rights and interests of a common Operating
Partnership unit, including the right to redeem the common Operating Partnership unit for a common
share in the Company or cash, at the option of the Operating Partnership.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had 929,099 LTIP units outstanding, of which 881,750 and
47,349 units were granted in December 2009 and January 2010, respectively. All of the LTIP units
are held by officers of the Company as of March 31, 2011. These LTIP units vest ratably
on each of the first five anniversaries of their date of grant. The LTIP units were valued using a
Monte Carlo simulation method model. The LTIP unit grants were valued at $8.50 per LTIP unit. As
of March 31, 2011, 185,820 units have vested.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $0.4 million in
share-based compensation expense related to the LTIP units. As of March 31, 2011, there was $5.9
million of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to LTIP units. This
unrecognized share-based compensation expense is expected to be recognized over the weighted-
average remaining vesting period of 3.8 years. As of March 31, 2011, none of the LTIP units had
reached parity. The accrued expense related to the LTIP unit grants is presented as
non-controlling interest in the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
Upon the closing of the Companys equity offering of common shares on April 6, 2011, the
Company determined that a revaluation event occurred and the LTIP units achieved full parity with
the common Operating Partnership units with respect to liquidating distributions and all other
purposes. Beginning in April 2011, the Company will allocate a portion of its net income (loss) to
these LTIP units.
Note 8. Earnings per Common Share
The following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in
thousands, except share and per-share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three |
|
|
For the three |
|
|
|
months ended
March |
|
|
months ended
March |
|
|
|
31, 2011 |
|
|
31, 2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,591 |
) |
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
Less: dividends paid on unvested restricted shares |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings attributable to unvested
restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,606 |
) |
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares basic |
|
|
39,827,551 |
|
|
|
20,260,046 |
|
Unvested restricted shares (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares
diluted |
|
|
39,827,551 |
|
|
|
20,260,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share attributable to common shareholders basic and
diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
(1) Anti-dilutive for all periods presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, 124,564 and 83,747 unvested restricted
shares, respectively, were excluded from diluted weighted-average common shares, as their effect
would have been anti-dilutive.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
Management Agreements
The Companys hotel properties operate pursuant to management agreements with various
management companies. The initial term of these management agreements ranges from 5 years to 20
years, not including renewals, and 5 years to 40 years, including renewals. Many of the Companys
management agreements are terminable at will upon paying a termination fee and some are terminable
upon sale of the property. Most of the agreements also provide the Company the ability to
terminate based on failure to achieve defined operating performance thresholds. Termination fees
range from zero to up to six times the annual base management and incentive management fees,
depending on the agreement and the reason for termination. Certain of the Companys management
agreements are non-terminable except upon the managers breach of a material representation or the
managers failure to meet performance thresholds as defined in the management agreement.
The management agreements require the payment of a base management fee generally between 2%
and 4% of hotel revenues. Under certain management agreements, the management companies are also
eligible to receive an incentive management fee if hotel
operating income, cash flows or other performance measures, as defined in the agreements,
exceeds certain performance thresholds. The incentive management fee is generally calculated as a
percentage of hotel operating income after the Company has received a priority return on its
investment in the hotel. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, base and incentive
management fees were $1.2 million and $0, respectively.
Reserve Funds
Certain of the Companys agreements with its hotel managers, franchisors and lenders have
provisions for the Company to provide funds, typically 4.0% of hotel revenues, sufficient to cover
the cost of (a) certain non-routine repairs and maintenance to the hotels and (b) replacements and
renewals to the hotels furniture, fixtures and equipment.
Restricted Cash
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $6.2 million and $4.5 million,
respectively, in restricted cash, which consists of reserves for replacement of furniture and
fixtures or reserves to pay for real estate taxes or property insurance under certain hotel
management agreements or lender requirements.
Ground Lease
The Monaco Washington DC is subject to a long-term ground lease agreement on the land
underlying the hotel. The ground lease expires in 2059. The hotel is required to pay the greater
of a base rent of $0.2 million or a percentage of gross hotel revenues and gross food and beverage
revenues in excess of certain thresholds, as defined in the agreement. The lease contains certain
restrictions on modifications that can be made to the structure due to its status as a national
historic landmark.
The Company assumed a long-term ground lease agreement in connection with its acquisition of
the Argonaut Hotel. The ground lease expires in 2059. The hotel is required to pay the greater of
a base rent of $1.2 million or a percentage of rooms revenues, food
12
and beverage revenues and other
department revenues in excess of certain thresholds, as defined in the agreement. The lease
contains certain restrictions on modifications that can be made to the structure due to its status
as a historic landmark.
Litigation
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels, the Company and the Operating
Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The
Company may obtain insurance to cover certain potential material losses. The Company is not presently
subject to any material litigation nor, to the Companys knowledge, is any material litigation
threatened against the Company.
Note 10. Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
( in thousands) |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable to common shares/units |
|
$ |
4,898 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable to preferred shares/units |
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares for board of trustees compensation |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan assumed in connection with acquisition |
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Subsequent Events
On April 6, 2011, the Company issued 10,925,000 common shares and raised $226.5 million, net
of underwriting discounts and offering costs, in a follow-on offering of common shares.
On April 6, 2011, the Company acquired the 450-room Westin Gaslamp Quarter located in San
Diego, California for $110.0 million. The Company also reimbursed the seller $10.6 million for the
sellers capital investment in the recently completed guestrooms renovation. The acquisition was
funded with available cash. The Company retained Starwood Hotels and Resorts to manage the
property.
On April 7, 2011, the Company acquired the 189-room Hotel Monaco Seattle located in Seattle,
Washington for $51.2 million. The acquisition was funded with available cash. The Company
retained Kimpton Hotels and Restaurants to manage the property.
On April 13, 2011, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC.
Under this shelf registration statement, the Company may issue common shares, preferred shares,
debt securities, warrants, and units from time to time.
The Company currently has three properties under contract for an aggregate purchase price of
$263.5 million. Two of these agreements were entered into after the end of the quarter. The
Company expects to fund these acquisitions with available cash. There can be no assurance that the
Company will complete these acquisitions.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
is a Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT. Substantially all of the operations are
conducted through Pebblebrook Hotel, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), a Delaware limited
partnership of which Pebblebrook Hotel Trust is the sole general partner and in which it owns all
of the common operating partnership units as of March 31, 2011. In this report, we use the terms
the Company, we or our to refer to Pebblebrook Hotel Trust and its subsidiaries, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the
Company, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking
statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and
expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words may, will, should, potential,
could, predict, continue, believe, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, project,
forecast or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include, among others,
statements about our business strategy, including our acquisition and development strategies,
industry trends, estimated revenues and expenses, ability to realize deferred tax assets and
expected liquidity needs and sources (including capital expenditures and the ability to obtain
financing or raise capital). You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond our
control and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Factors
that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
the timing and availability of potential hotel acquisitions and our ability to
identify and complete hotel acquisitions in accordance with our business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the hotel industry, including competition, increases in
employment costs, energy costs and other operating costs, or decreases in demand
caused by actual or threatened terrorist attacks, any type of flu or disease-related
pandemic, or downturns in general and local economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the availability and terms of financing and capital and the general volatility of
securities markets; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on third-party managers of our hotels, including our inability to
implement strategic business decisions directly; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the real estate industry, including environmental
contamination and costs of complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
similar laws; |
|
|
|
|
interest rate increases; |
|
|
|
|
our possible failure to qualify as a REIT and the risk of changes in laws
affecting REITs; |
|
|
|
|
the possibility of uninsured losses; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with redevelopment and repositioning projects, including delays
and overruns; and |
|
|
|
|
the other factors discussed under the heading Risk Factors in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as updated
elsewhere in this report. |
Accordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations will be realized. Except as otherwise
required by the federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligations or undertaking to publicly
release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere)
to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions
or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Overview
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust is an internally managed hotel investment company, organized in
October 2009, to opportunistically acquire and invest in hotel properties located primarily in
major U.S. cities, with an emphasis on the major coastal markets. As of March 31, 2011, we owned
nine hotels with a total of 2,552 guest rooms located in six states and the District of Columbia.
14
During the first quarter of 2011, we continued to execute our business strategy of raising
additional capital and acquiring hotel properties. In February 2011, we acquired our ninth
property, the Argonaut Hotel located in San Francisco, California, for $84.0 million. In March
2011, we raised $120.9 million in net proceeds through the issuance of 5.0 million shares of 7.875%
Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares. Subsequent to the quarter end, we raised an
additional $226.5 million with the follow-on offering of 10.9 million common shares and acquired
two additional hotel properties, The Westin Gaslamp Quarter and Hotel Monaco Seattle for $110.0
million and $51.2 million, respectively. We currently have three properties under contract for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $263.5 million. We expect to fund these acquisitions
with available cash. There can be no assurance that we will complete these acquisitions. We
continue to see attractive opportunities and expect to be very active in pursuing acquisitions for
the remainder of 2011.
In addition to being active with acquisitions and capital raising activities, we have also
begun employing our asset management initiatives on the properties we currently own. Although we
do not operate our hotel properties, both our asset management team and our executive management
team monitor our hotel managers performance in all aspects of our hotels operations, including
property positioning and repositioning, operations analysis, physical design, renovation and
capital improvements, guest experience and overall strategic direction. Through these initiatives,
we seek to improve property efficiencies, lower costs, maximize revenues, and enhance property
operating margins which will enhance returns to our shareholders. During the first quarter of
2011, we invested approximately $9.6 million to complete renovation projects at the Sir Francis
Drake, The Grand Minneapolis, and DoubleTree by Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC hotels. We expect to
invest approximately $60.0 million in 2011 on renovation and repositioning projects.
The U.S. hotel industry has continued to recover during the first quarter of 2011 due to a
strong rebound in corporate transient and group travel. As a result, this has led to strong growth
in occupancy, with more recent increases in average daily rates (ADR). Hotel demand continues to
be strong across most of the major urban markets, and while we expect increases in occupancy
to lead to increases in room rates in the majority of urban markets, the rest of the economy
continues to slowly recover from the severe decline in hotel
industry fundamentals experienced since 2008.
Despite the uncertainty about the overall strength and speed of the economic recovery and
concerns about inflation and increases in fuel costs, we remain optimistic that we are at the
beginning of a long and healthy recovery in the hotel industry. We continue to believe that we are
positioned to take advantage of opportunities in the market, and we continue to operate under the
belief that this is an opportune time to acquire high quality hotels in major urban locations at
attractive cash yields and meaningful discounts to our estimates of their long-term economic values.
Key Indicators of Financial Condition and Operating Performance
We measure hotel results of operations and the operating performance of our business by
evaluating financial and nonfinancial metrics such as room revenue per available room (RevPAR);
average daily rate (ADR); occupancy rate (occupancy); funds from operations (FFO); earnings
before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); and hotel EBITDA. We
evaluate individual hotel and company-wide performance with comparisons to budgets, prior periods
and competing properties. ADR, occupancy and RevPAR may be impacted by macroeconomic factors as
well as regional and local economies and events. See Non-GAAP Financial Matters for further
discussion of FFO and EBITDA.
Results of Operations
Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 include the operating
activities of the nine hotels we owned since their respective dates of acquisition and are not
indicative of the results we expect when our investment strategy has been fully executed. We owned
no hotel properties at March 31, 2010. Our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$0.6 million, which consisted of $1.0 million of interest income and general and administrative
expenses of $1.5 million.
Three months ended March 31, 2011
Revenues and operating expenses for our hotels for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (in
thousands) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Expenses |
|
DoubleTree by Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC |
|
$ |
2,652 |
|
|
$ |
2,221 |
|
Sir Francis Drake |
|
|
7,786 |
|
|
|
6,880 |
|
InterContinental Buckhead |
|
|
8,566 |
|
|
|
5,613 |
|
Monaco Washington DC |
|
|
5,157 |
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
The Grand Hotel Minneapolis |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
Skamania Lodge |
|
|
3,420 |
|
|
|
3,214 |
|
Sheraton Delfina |
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
Sofitel Philadelphia |
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
4,116 |
|
Argonaut Hotel |
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42,665 |
|
|
$ |
32,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization expense was $4.8 million.
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and property insurance Real estate taxes, personal
property taxes and insurance incurred for the hotels owned were $1.9 million.
Corporate general and administrative Total corporate general and administrative expenses were
$2.3 million, which consisted of employee compensation costs (including non-cash share-based
compensation cost of $0.6 million), professional fees, insurance and other expenses.
Hotel property acquisition costs Hotel property acquisition costs were $1.7 million.
Interest income Interest income on cash and cash equivalents and investments was $0.5 million.
Interest expense Interest expense incurred was $2.9 million which included unused fees on our
credit facility, interest on our mortgage debt, and amortization of deferred financing fees.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Non-GAAP financial measures are measures of our historical or future financial performance
that are different from measures calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We report
FFO and EBITDA, which are non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors as
key measures of our operating performance.
We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income (calculated in accordance with
GAAP), excluding depreciation and amortization, gains (losses) from sales of real estate, the
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles and adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly
assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate
values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, most industry investors
consider presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost
accounting to be insufficient by themselves. By excluding the effect of depreciation and
amortization and gains (losses) from sales of real estate, both of which are based on historical
cost accounting and which may be of lesser significance in evaluating current performance, we
believe that FFO provides investors a useful financial measure to evaluate our operating
performance.
The following table reconciles net loss to FFO for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 (in thousands except share and per-share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,591 |
) |
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO |
|
$ |
1,176 |
|
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization. We believe that EBITDA provides investors a useful financial measure to evaluate our
operating performance, excluding the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense)
and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization).
16
The following table reconciles net loss to EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(3,591 |
) |
|
$ |
(599 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,797 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
4,219 |
|
|
$ |
(594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither FFO nor EBITDA represent cash generated from operating activities as determined
by U.S. GAAP and neither should be considered as an alternative to U.S. GAAP net income (loss), as
an indication of our financial performance, or to U.S. GAAP cash flow from operating activities, as
a measure of liquidity. In addition, FFO and EBITDA are not indicative of funds available to fund
cash needs, including the ability to make cash distributions.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be
materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use
of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain critical accounting
policies, are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under our senior
secured revolving credit facility. We expect our existing cash balances and cash provided by
operations will be adequate to fund operating requirements, pay interest on any borrowings and fund
dividends in accordance with the REIT requirements of the federal income tax laws.
We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as hotel property acquisitions,
property redevelopment and debt maturities, through the net proceeds from additional issuances of common shares,
issuances of preferred shares, issuances of units of limited partnership interest in our operating
partnership, secured and unsecured borrowings, and cash provided by operations. The success of our
business strategy may depend in part on our ability to access additional capital through issuances
of debt and equity securities, which is dependent on favorable market conditions.
Over the long-term, we intend to limit the sum of the outstanding principal amount of our
consolidated net indebtedness to not more than 4.5x our EBITDA for the 12-month period preceding
the incurrence of that debt. Net indebtedness consists of total debt less cash and cash equivalents
and investments. Compliance with this limitation will be measured at the time debt is incurred, and
a subsequent decrease in EBITDA will not require us to repay debt. In addition, if we assume or
incur debt in connection with our hotel acquisitions, our debt level could exceed the general
limitation described above.
We currently have three properties under contract for an aggregate purchase price of $263.5
million. We expect to fund these acquisitions with available cash. There can be no assurance that
we will complete these acquisitions.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash are cash from operations, borrowings under mortgage financings,
draws on our credit facility and the proceeds from offerings of our equity securities. Our
principal uses of cash are asset acquisitions, debt service, capital expenditures, operating costs,
corporate expenses and dividends.
17
Cash provided by Operations. Our cash provided by operating activities was $0.2 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Our cash from operations includes the operating
activities of the nine owned hotels. Our operating activities for the three months ended March 31,
2010 were insignificant as we did not own any hotel properties during this period.
Cash used in Investing Activities. Our cash used in investing activities was $62.4 million
and $15.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the
three months ended March 31, 2011, we used $37.2 million to acquire the Argonaut Hotel, incurred
capital expenditures of $9.6 million at our hotels, placed deposits of $13.5 million on three
properties, two of which we acquired in April 2011, and had an increase in restricted cash of $2.1
million. In 2010, we invested $15.0 million in certificates of deposits.
Cash provided by Financing Activities. Approximately $182.1 million of cash was provided by
financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011, which consisted of $125.0 million
of proceeds received from our offering of Series A preferred shares which were offset by $4.0
million in offering-related costs and $67.0 million of proceeds received from the mortgage debt
placed on the Skamania Lodge and DoubleTree hotels. We also paid $4.9 million in distributions
during the quarter. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we paid $1.5 million in
offering-related costs for our December 2009 initial public offering of common shares and
concurrent private placement.
Capital Investments
We intend to maintain all of our hotels, and will maintain each hotel that we acquire in the
future, in good repair and condition and in conformity with applicable laws and regulations and in
accordance with the franchisors standards and the agreed-upon requirements in our management
agreements. Routine capital investments will be administered by the hotel management companies.
However, we maintain approval rights over the capital investments as part of the annual budget
process and as required from time to time.
From time to time, certain of our hotel properties may undergo renovations as a result of our
decision to upgrade portions of the hotels, such as guestrooms, meeting space and restaurants, in
order to better compete with other hotels in our markets. In addition, after we acquire a hotel
property, we are often required by the franchisor, if there is one, to complete a property
improvement plan (PIP) in order to bring the hotel property up to the franchisors standards.
Generally we expect to fund the renovations and improvements with cash and cash equivalents or
borrowings under our credit facility.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we invested approximately $9.6 million on capital
investments to reposition the properties we owned. We expect to
invest approximately $60.0 million
on capital investments in 2011.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The table below summarizes our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2011 and the effect
such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Mortgage loans (1) |
|
$ |
286,312 |
|
|
$ |
145,588 |
|
|
$ |
15,657 |
|
|
$ |
125,067 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Ground leases (2) |
|
|
66,238 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
59,338 |
|
Purchase commitments (3) |
|
|
6,360 |
|
|
|
6,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate office lease |
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
359,903 |
|
|
$ |
153,589 |
|
|
$ |
18,977 |
|
|
$ |
127,999 |
|
|
$ |
59,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts include interest expense. |
|
(2) |
|
The long-term ground leases on the Hotel Monaco Washington DC and the
Argonaut Hotel provide for the greater of base or percentage rent, adjusted for
CPI increases. The table assumes base rent for all periods presented and does
not include assumptions for CPI adjustments. |
|
(3) |
|
These represent purchase orders and contracts that have been executed for
renovation projects at the properties. We are committed to these purchase orders and contracts and
anticipate making similar arrangements in the future with the existing
properties or any future properties that we may acquire. |
18
We currently have three properties under contract for an aggregate purchase price of
$263.5 million. We expect to fund these acquisitions with available cash. There can be no
assurance that we will complete these acquisitions.
Inflation
We rely on the performance of the hotels to increase revenues to keep pace with inflation.
Our hotel operators possess the ability to adjust room rates daily although competitive pressures
may limit the ability of our operators to raise rates faster than inflation or even at the same
rate.
Seasonality
Demand in the lodging industry is affected by recurring seasonal patterns. Generally, we
expect that we will have lower revenue, operating income and cash flow in the first and fourth
quarters and higher revenue, operating income and cash flow in the second and third quarters. These
general trends are, however, expected to be greatly influenced by overall economic cycles and the
geographic locations of the hotels we acquire.
Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes. We
may enter into derivative instruments including interest rate swaps, caps and collars to manage or
hedge interest rate risk. Derivative instruments are subject to fair value reporting at each
reporting date and the increase or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss) or
accumulated other comprehensive income, based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. As of
March 31, 2011, we have an interest rate cap in connection with the mortgage debt assumed with the
acquisition of the Sofitel Philadelphia hotel. This interest rate cap was not designated as a
hedging instrument and as such changes in the fair value of the instrument have been recorded in
our statement of operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the interest rate cap had
an immaterial effect on our statement of operations. We did not utilize any derivative instruments
during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. We seek to limit the impact of
interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower the overall borrowing costs by
closely monitoring the Companys variable rate debt and converting such debt to fixed rates when
the Company deems such conversion advantageous. As of March 31, 2011, approximately $56.1 million
of the Companys aggregate indebtedness (22% of total indebtedness) was subject to variable
interest rates.
If market rates of interest on the Companys variable rate debt fluctuate by 0.25%, interest
expense would increase or decrease, depending on rate movement, future earnings and cash flows by
approximately $0.1 million annually. This assumes that the amount outstanding under our variable
rate debt remains at $56.1 million, the balance as of March 31, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most
recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels and us to the risk of claims and
litigation in the normal course of business. We are not presently subject to any material
litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, other than routine
actions for negligence or other claims and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of business, some of
19
which are expected to be covered by liability insurance and all of which collectively are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, results of operations or our financial
condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Risk Factors
section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved.]
Item 5. Other information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3.1*
|
|
Declaration of Trust, as amended and supplemented, of the Registrant |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Loan Agreement, between Terrapins Owner LLC, as Borrower, and UBS
Real Estate Securities Inc., as Lender (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 7, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Loan Agreement between Tar Heel Borrower LLC, as Borrower, Tar Heel
Owner LLC, as Maryland Guarantor, and Goldman Sachs Commercial
Mortgage Capital, L.P., as Lender (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on January 26, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Historical Lease, dated October 16, 2000, by and between the United
States Department of the Interior, National Park Service acting
through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region, an agency of
the United States of America, and Maritime Hotel Associates, L.P.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Historic Lease, dated February 6, 2001, by and
between the United States Department of the Interior, National Park
Service acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region,
an agency of the United States of America, and Maritime Hotel
Associates, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22,
2011). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Historic Lease, dated December 9, 2008, by and
between the United States Department of the Interior, National Park
Service acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region,
an agency of the United States of America, and Maritime Hotel
Associates, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22,
2011). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Eleventh Amendment to Historic Lease, dated February 16, 2011, by
and between the United States Department of the Interior, National
Park Service acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West
Region, an agency of the United States of America, and Wildcats
Owner LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22,
2011). |
20
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
10.7
|
|
Assignment and Assumption of Historical Lease, by and among the
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service
acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region, an
Agency of the United States of America, Maritime Hotel Associates,
L.P., and Wildcats Owner LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Promissory Note by Maritime Hotel Associates, L.P. in favor of
Wachovia Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Assumption Agreement, by and among Bank of America, N.A., as
successor to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the registered
holders of COBALT CMBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C2,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C2,
Maritime Hotel Associates, L.P., Kimpton Development Opportunity
Fund, L.P., Wildcats Owner LLC, and Pebblebrook Hotel, L.P.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixtures
Filing dated as of February 23, 2007 by and among Maritime Hotel
Associates, L.P., as borrower, to First American Title Insurance
Company, as Trustee for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February
22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Starwood CMBS I, LLC, as
seller, and Bruins Owner LLC, as purchaser, dated as of March 22,
2011, for The Westin Gaslamp, San Diego (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A
filed on March 31, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
|
|
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
21
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST
|
|
Date: April 28, 2011 |
/s/ Jon E. Bortz
|
|
|
Jon E. Bortz |
|
|
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
22
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3.1*
|
|
Declaration of Trust, as amended and supplemented, of the Registrant |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Loan Agreement, between Terrapins Owner LLC, as Borrower, and UBS
Real Estate Securities Inc., as Lender (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on January 7, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Loan Agreement between Tar Heel Borrower LLC, as Borrower, Tar Heel
Owner LLC, as Maryland Guarantor, and Goldman Sachs Commercial
Mortgage Capital, L.P., as Lender (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on January 26, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Historical Lease, dated October 16, 2000, by and between the United
States Department of the Interior, National Park Service acting
through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region, an agency of
the United States of America, and Maritime Hotel Associates, L.P.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Historic Lease, dated February 6, 2001, by and
between the United States Department of the Interior, National Park
Service acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region,
an agency of the United States of America, and Maritime Hotel
Associates, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22,
2011). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Tenth Amendment to Historic Lease, dated December 9, 2008, by and
between the United States Department of the Interior, National Park
Service acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region,
an agency of the United States of America, and Maritime Hotel
Associates, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22,
2011). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Eleventh Amendment to Historic Lease, dated February 16, 2011, by
and between the United States Department of the Interior, National
Park Service acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West
Region, an agency of the United States of America, and Wildcats
Owner LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22,
2011). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Assignment and Assumption of Historical Lease, by and among the
United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service
acting through the Regional Director, Pacific West Region, an
Agency of the United States of America, Maritime Hotel Associates,
L.P., and Wildcats Owner LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Promissory Note by Maritime Hotel Associates, L.P. in favor of
Wachovia Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Assumption Agreement, by and among Bank of America, N.A., as
successor to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the registered
holders of COBALT CMBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2007-C2,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-C2,
Maritime Hotel Associates, L.P., Kimpton Development Opportunity
Fund, L.P., Wildcats Owner LLC, and Pebblebrook Hotel, L.P.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Deed of Trust, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Fixtures
Filing dated as of February 23, 2007 by and among Maritime Hotel
Associates, L.P., as borrower, to First American Title Insurance
Company, as Trustee for the benefit of Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as lender (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8
to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February
22, 2011). |
|
10.11
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Starwood CMBS I, LLC, as
seller, and Bruins Owner LLC, as purchaser, dated as of March 22,
2011, for The Westin Gaslamp, San Diego |
23
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
(Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K/A
filed on March 31, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
24