Edgar Filing: CELGENE CORP /DE/

e10vq

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-34912

CELGENE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		22-2711928

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation		(I.R.S. Employer Identification
or organization)		Number)

86 Morris Avenue, Summit, NJ		07901

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(908) 673-9000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

At April 27, 2011, 462,801,485 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.

CELGENE CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS


	Page No.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Statements of Income - Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		2

Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010		3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		4

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		34

Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		46

Item 4 Controls and Procedures		49

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 Legal Proceedings		49

Item 1A Risk Factors		49

Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		66

Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities		66

Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		66

Item 5 Other Information		66

Item 6 Exhibits		67

Signatures		68

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010

Revenue:
Net product sales	$	1,083,609		$	759,411
Collaborative agreements and other revenue		9,303			2,380
Royalty revenue		32,369			29,463

Total revenue		1,125,281			791,254


Expenses:
Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)		127,268			61,915
Research and development		435,478			204,657
Selling, general and administrative		302,261			207,978
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		69,050			41,593
Acquisition related (gains) charges and restructuring, net		(96,744	)		4,862

Total costs and expenses		837,313			521,005


Operating income		287,968			270,249

Other income and expense:
Interest and investment income, net		4,522			14,084
Equity in (gains) losses of affiliated companies		556			(741	)
Interest expense		11,750			481
Other income, net		6,624			3,766

Income before income taxes		286,808			288,359

Income tax provision		31,722			53,917

Net income		255,086			234,442
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		504			—

Net income attributable to Celgene	$	255,590		$	234,442


Net income per share attributable to Celgene:
Basic	$	0.55		$	0.51
Diluted	$	0.54		$	0.50

Weighted average shares:
Basic		465,993			459,914

Diluted		472,235			467,655

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010

Assets

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,486,992		$	1,351,128
Marketable securities available for sale		943,627			1,250,173
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $15,725 and $13,104 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		804,035			706,429
Inventory		223,233			260,130
Deferred income taxes		150,416			151,779
Other current assets		245,952			275,005
Assets held for sale		339,025			348,555

Total current assets		4,193,280			4,343,199

Property, plant and equipment, net		516,972			509,919
Investment in affiliated companies		25,672			23,073
Intangible assets, net		3,061,112			3,248,498
Goodwill		1,896,326			1,896,344
Other assets		150,991			156,129

Total assets	$	9,844,353		$	10,177,162


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	99,475		$	94,465
Accrued expenses		504,768			592,336
Income taxes payable		8,055			11,423
Current portion of deferred revenue		14,386			16,362
Other current liabilities		359,652			309,214
Liabilities of disposal group		22,503			46,582

Total current liabilities		1,008,839			1,070,382

Deferred revenue, net of current portion		8,155			12,785
Income taxes payable		578,922			551,896
Deferred income taxes		821,103			882,870
Other non-current liabilities		301,077			416,173
Long-term debt, net of discount		1,247,420			1,247,584

Total liabilities		3,965,516			4,181,690


Commitments and Contingencies

Equity:

Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value per share, 575,000,000 shares authorized; issued 482,817,315 and 482,164,353 shares at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		4,828			4,822
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 20,050,420 and 11,776,036 shares at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		(984,650	)		(545,588	)
Additional paid-in capital		6,430,874			6,350,240
Retained earnings		503,856			248,266
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(87,069	)		(73,767	)

Total stockholders’ equity		5,867,839			5,983,973
Non-controlling interest		10,998			11,499

Total equity		5,878,837			5,995,472

Total liabilities and equity	$	9,844,353		$	10,177,162

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	255,086		$	234,442

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation of long-term assets		17,281			11,951
Amortization		69,677			41,875
Allocation of pre-paid royalties		9,624			12,606
Provision (benefit) for accounts receivable allowances		191			(1,265	)
Deferred income taxes		(64,914	)		(10,136	)
Impairment of acquired in-process research and development		118,000			—
Change in value of contingent consideration		(99,535	)		4,862
Share-based compensation expense		59,153			41,428
Equity in (gains) losses of affiliated companies		556			(741	)
Share-based employee benefit plan expense		4,413			4,344
Unrealized change in value of foreign currency forward contracts		2,435			6,571
Realized (gain) loss on marketable securities available for sale		1,346			(4,962	)
Other, net		(715	)		954

Change in current assets and liabilities, excluding the effect of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(76,139	)		(54,375	)
Inventory		40,762			(233	)
Other operating assets		26,128			14,716
Assets held for sale, net		(7,820	)		—
Accounts payable and other operating liabilities		(97,394	)		(29,908	)
Income tax payable		24,088			10,697
Deferred revenue		(6,953	)		1,824

Net cash provided by operating activities		275,270			284,650


Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities available for sale		799,346			1,196,864
Purchases of marketable securities available for sale		(498,720	)		(1,200,626	)
Payments for acquisition of business, net of cash acquired		—			(337,608	)
Capital expenditures		(23,161	)		(18,906	)
Investment in affiliated companies		(1,310	)		(550	)
Purchases of investment securities		(533	)		(2,725	)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		275,622			(363,551	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment for treasury shares		(450,014	)		—
Net proceeds from exercise of common stock options and warrants		18,305			31,669
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation arrangements		4,781			12,228

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(426,928	)		43,897


Effect of currency rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		11,900			(11,622	)


Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		135,864			(46,626	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,351,128			1,102,172


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,486,992		$	1,055,546

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activity:

Contingent consideration issued in acquisition of Gloucester	$	—		$	230,201


Change in net unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities available for sale	$	(2,030	)	$	(5,603	)


Matured shares tendered in connection with stock option exercises	$	—		$	(163	)


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Interest paid	$	—		$	—


Income taxes paid	$	32,953		$	40,525

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In all accompanying tables, amounts of dollars expressed in thousands,

except per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)

1. Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively “Celgene” or the “Company”) is a global biopharmaceutical company primarily engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies designed to treat cancer and immune-inflammatory diseases. The Company is dedicated to innovative research and development which is designed to bring new therapies to market and is involved in research in several scientific areas that may deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas such as intracellular signaling pathways in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmunity and placental cell, including stem and progenitor cell, research.

The Company’s primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID^®, VIDAZA^®, THALOMID^® (inclusive of Thalidomide Celgene^® and Thalidomide Pharmion^®), ABRAXANE^®, and ISTODAX^®. Additional sources of revenue include a licensing agreement with Novartis Pharma AG, or Novartis, which entitles the Company to royalties on FOCALIN XR^® and the entire RITALIN^® family of drugs and the sale of services through the Company’s Cellular Therapeutics subsidiary and other miscellaneous licensing agreements. Through the end of March 2011, the Company received residual payments from GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, based upon GSK’s ALKERAN^® revenues.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries, including certain former Abraxis entities determined to be non-core to the Company and reported as assets held for sale and liabilities of disposal group on the consolidated balance sheet. Investments in limited partnerships and interests where the Company has an equity interest of 50% or less and does not otherwise have a controlling financial interest are accounted for by either the equity or cost method. The Company records net income attributable to non-controlling interest in its Consolidated Statements of Income equal to the percentage of ownership interest retained in the respective operations by the non-controlling parties.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company is subject to certain risks and uncertainties related to product development, regulatory approval, market acceptance, scope of patent and proprietary rights, competition, technological change and product liability.

Interim results may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. In the opinion of management, these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim consolidated financial statements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, or the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

New Accounting Pronouncements: In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2010-29, “Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information,” or ASU 2010-29. ASU 2010-29 clarifies disclosure requirements to require public entities that enter into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis to disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period, including pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the acquisition date had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. ASU 2010-29 is effective for material business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2011 and early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted the disclosure requirements of ASU 2010-29 in the reporting of its acquisition of Abraxis in October 2010 in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

3. Acquisitions

Abraxis BioScience, Inc.

On October 15, 2010, or the Acquisition Date, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Abraxis BioScience, Inc., or Abraxis in exchange for consideration valued at the Acquisition Date at approximately $3.205 billion, consisting of cash, stock and contingent value rights, or CVRs. The transaction, referred to as the Merger, resulted in Abraxis becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

As discussed further in the section entitled “Contingent Value Rights” below, a holder of a CVR is entitled to receive a pro rata portion of cash payments that the Company is obligated to pay to all holders of CVRs, which is determined by achievement of certain net sales and U.S. regulatory approval milestones. Potential cash payments to CVR holders range from no payment if no regulatory milestones or net sales thresholds are met, to a maximum of $650 million in milestone payments plus payments based on annual net sales levels achieved if all milestones are met at the earliest target dates and sales exceed threshold amounts.

The Merger has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting which requires that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at their fair values as of the acquisition date and requires the fair value of acquired in-process research and development, or IPR&D, to be classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. A preliminary purchase price allocation has been made and the recorded amounts are subject to change. The following items are subject to change:

	•		amounts for intangible assets and associated deferred tax liabilities pending finalization of valuation efforts;

	•		amounts for property plant and equipment, pending the confirmation of physical existence and condition of certain property, plant and equipment;

	•		amounts for assumed contingent liabilities pending the finalization of our examination and valuation of filed cases;

	•		amounts for income tax assets, receivables and liabilities, pending the filing of Abraxis pre-acquisition tax returns.

No adjustments were made during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 to the amounts initially recorded for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the Acquisition Date. The amounts recognized will be finalized as the information necessary to complete the analyses is obtained, but no later than one year from the Acquisition Date. Material adjustments, if any, could require retrospective application if they impact amortization amounts.

The purchase of Abraxis included a number of assets that are not associated with the nab^® technology or ABRAXANE^®. These assets, or non-core assets, consist of a number of subsidiaries, tangible assets, equity investments, joint venture partnerships and assets that support research and sales of products not related to the nab^® technology. At the time of acquisition, the Company committed to a plan to divest the non-core assets that are classified as assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with the associated liabilities classified as liabilities of disposal group. Subsequent to March 31, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the majority of the non-core assets (See Note 19).

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Contingent Value Rights

In connection with the Merger on October 15, 2010, CVRs were issued under a CVR agreement entered into by Celgene and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, the trustee. The CVRs are registered for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CELGZ.” The fair value of the CVRs and the liability of the Company related to payments under the CVR agreement is subject to fluctuation based on trading prices for the publicly traded CVRs. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the Company has measured the contingent consideration represented by the CVRs at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in operating earnings.

Each holder of a CVR is entitled to receive a pro rata portion, based on the number of CVRs then outstanding, of each of the following contingent cash payments:

	•		Milestone Payment #1. $250 million upon U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, approval of ABRAXANE^® for use in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC, if such approval permits the Company to market ABRAXANE^® under a label that includes a progression-free survival, or PFS, claim, but only if the foregoing milestone is achieved no later than the fifth anniversary of the Merger.

	•		Milestone Payment #2. $400 million (if achieved no later than April 1, 2013) or $300 million (if achieved after April 1, 2013 and before the fifth anniversary of the Merger) upon FDA approval of ABRAXANE^® for use in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, if such approval permits the Company to market ABRAXANE^® under a label that includes an overall survival claim.

	•		Net Sales Payments. For each full one-year period ending December 31st during the term of the CVR agreement, which we refer to as a net sales measuring period (with the first net sales measuring period beginning January 1, 2011 and ending December 31, 2011):

	•		2.5% of the net sales of ABRAXANE^® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $1 billion but are less than or equal to $2 billion for such period, plus

	•		an additional amount equal to 5% of the net sales of ABRAXANE^® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $2 billion but are less than or equal to $3 billion for such period, plus

	•		an additional amount equal to 10% of the net sales of ABRAXANE^® and the Abraxis pipeline products that exceed $3 billion for such period.

No payments will be due under the CVR agreement with respect to net sales of ABRAXANE^® and the Abraxis pipeline products achieved after December 31, 2025, which we refer to as the net sales payment termination date, unless net sales for the net sales measuring period ending on December 31, 2025 are equal to or greater than $1 billion, in which case the net sales payment termination date will be extended until the last day of the net sales measuring period subsequent to December 31, 2025 during which net sales of ABRAXANE^® and the Abraxis pipeline products are less than $1 billion or, if earlier, December 31, 2030.

The results of the ongoing ABRAXANE^® Phase III study in NSCLC, or the NSCLC study, were presented at a major scientific congress in June 2010. These interim results indicated that the primary endpoint of overall response rate was met and that it achieved statistical significance. On January 10, 2011, the Company further announced that it had completed an interim analysis on the secondary endpoint for PFS for the NSCLC study. This interim PFS result, while not negative, was not statistically significant. The NSCLC approval, if achieved, would be based on the Special Protocol Assessment, or SPA, agreed upon with the FDA. The SPA states that the trial must reach the primary endpoint of response rate, which has been met, as well as showing that the secondary endpoint of PFS is not negative, i.e. no detrimental effect on progression free survival for the ABRAXANE^® arm. The interim

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

analysis did not show that the ABRAXANE^® arm was worse than the comparator arm, supporting the requirements as described in the SPA with the FDA. However, because the interim PFS result was not statistically significant, this reduces the probability that a payment will be made for Milestone Payment #1 under the CVR agreement that the Company entered into with the former shareholders of Abraxis. Should the final analysis of the PFS data, which is expected in the middle of 2011, not demonstrate a statistically significant positive result on the total dataset, then Milestone Payment #1 under the CVR agreement has a high probability of not being met. Milestone Payment #1 relates to the marketing of ABRAXANE^® for the treatment of NSCLC under a label that includes a PFS claim, but only if the foregoing milestone is achieved no later than the fifth anniversary of the acquisition of Abraxis. The market value of the publicly traded CVRs, which represents the fair value of the Company’s liability for all potential payments under the CVR agreement, decreased from $212.0 million at December 31, 2010 to $106.4 million at March 31, 2011. The reduction in the fair value of the Company’s liability was recognized as a gain of $105.6 million in acquisition-related (gains) charges and restructuring, net on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011.

The Company has evaluated the value assigned to the IPR&D from Abraxis and determined that based on a lower level of probable sales than that estimated at the time of acquisition for sales of ABRAXANE^® for NSCLC under a label that includes a PFS claim, the fair value of the IPR&D acquired from Abraxis has fallen below the $1.290 billion recorded at the time of acquisition. An impairment charge included in research and development on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income in the amount of $118.0 million was recorded in the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 to reduce the value of the IPR&D asset acquired from Abraxis to its revised current fair value of $1.172 billion at March 31, 2011.

Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

On January 15, 2010, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock and stock options of Gloucester. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed of Gloucester were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated with those of the Company. Gloucester’s results of operations are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

The Company paid $338.9 million in cash before milestone payments and may make additional future payments of up to $300.0 million in contingent regulatory milestone payments. As part of the Company’s consideration for the Gloucester acquisition, it is contractually obligated to pay certain consideration resulting from the outcome of future events. The Company updates its assumptions each reporting period based on new developments and records such amounts at fair value until such consideration is satisfied.

Subsequent to the acquisition date, the Company has measured the contingent consideration arrangement at fair value each period with changes in fair value recognized in operating earnings. Changes in fair values reflect new information about the IPR&D assets and the passage of time. In the absence of new information, changes in fair value reflect only the passage of time as development work towards the achievement of the milestones progresses, and will be accrued based on an accretion schedule. At March 31, 2011, the balance of the contingent consideration was $258.9 million, of which $175.9 million is included in other current liabilities and $83.0 million included in other non-current liabilities.

4. Restructuring

The Company has incurred costs from restructuring activities related to the October 15, 2010 acquisition of Abraxis. Restructuring costs include employee termination costs, contract termination fees and facility closing costs. Employee termination costs are generally recorded when the actions are probable and estimable and include accrued severance benefits and health insurance continuation, many of which may be paid out during periods after termination.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes restructuring liability activity related to the Abraxis acquisition during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011:


	Balance		Expense				Balance		Cumulative
	December 31, 2010		Recognized		Payments		March 31, 2011		Payments

Severance costs	$	14,881	$	300	$	5,134	$	10,047	$	6,367
Contract termination fees		—		1,304		1,304		—		1,304
Facility closing costs		—		1,138		37		1,101		37

Total restructuring costs	$	14,881	$	2,742	$	6,475	$	11,148	$	7,708

The Company expects to incur additional restructuring expense of approximately $2.8 million in 2011 and $0.5 million in 2012. Future cash payments related to the restructuring activity are estimated to amount to $9.6 million in 2011, $4.4 million in 2012 and $0.4 million in 2013.

5. Earnings Per Share


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share)	2011		2010

Net income attributable to Celgene	$	255,590	$	234,442


Weighted-average shares:
Basic		465,993		459,914
Effect of dilutive securities:
Options, restricted stock units, warrants and other incentives		6,242		7,741

Diluted		472,235		467,655


Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.55	$	0.51
Diluted	$	0.54	$	0.50

The total number of potential shares of common stock excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive was 26,149,808 and 18,775,142 shares for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company’s Board of Directors has approved an aggregate $2.0 billion common share repurchase program ending in December 2012. As of March 31, 2011, an aggregate 16,072,008 shares of common stock were repurchased under the program, including 8,510,780 shares of common stock repurchased during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

6. Comprehensive Income

A summary of comprehensive income, net of tax, is summarized as follows:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010

Net income	$	255,086		$	234,442


Other comprehensive income:

Marketable securities:

Net unrealized gains on marketable securities available for sale, net of tax		2,030			5,112
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) and losses included in net income		1,355			(4,976	)


Total other comprehensive gains (losses) related to marketable securities available for sale, net of tax		3,385			136
Net unrealized gains (losses) related to cash flow hedges, net of tax		(30,524	)		57,003
Currency translation adjustments		13,837			38,370

Total other comprehensive income (loss) items		(13,302	)		95,509

Comprehensive income		241,784			329,951

Comprehensive loss attributable to non-controlling interest		504			—


Comprehensive income attributable to Celgene	$	242,288		$	329,951

7. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurement

The table below presents information about assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value. Fair values determined based on Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company’s Level 1 assets consist of marketable equity securities. Fair values determined based on Level 2 inputs utilize observable quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and observable quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not very active. The Company’s Level 2 assets consist primarily of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities and global corporate debt securities. Fair values determined based on Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable inputs and include valuations of assets or liabilities for which there is little, if any, market activity. The Company’s Level 3 assets consist of warrants for the purchase of equity securities in non-publicly traded companies and an investment in common shares of a small biopharmaceutical company. The Company’s Level 1 liability relates to publicly traded CVRs. The Level 2 liability relates to forward currency contracts and the Level 3 liability consists of contingent consideration related to undeveloped product rights resulting from the Gloucester acquisition.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


				Quoted Price in			Significant			Significant
				Active Markets for			Other Observable			Unobservable
	Balance at			Identical Assets			Inputs			Inputs
	March 31, 2011			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)

Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	177,725		$	—		$	177,725		$	—
Available-for-sale securities		943,627			417			943,210			—
Interest rate swaps		760			—			760			—
Warrants		2,060			—			—			2,060
Warrants classified as held for sale		1,257			—			—			1,257
Securities classified as held for sale		28,436			12,198			—			16,238

Total assets	$	1,153,865		$	12,615		$	1,121,695		$	19,555


Liabilities:
Forward currency contracts	$	(51,010	)	$	—		$	(51,010	)	$	—
Acquisition related contingent consideration		(365,402	)		(106,454	)		—			(258,948	)

Total liabilities	$	(416,412	)	$	(106,454	)	$	(51,010	)	$	(258,948	)


				Quoted Price in			Significant			Significant
				Active Markets for			Other Observable			Unobservable
	Balance at			Identical Assets			Inputs			Inputs
	December 31, 2010			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)

Assets:
Cash equivalents	$	5,000		$	—		$	5,000		$	—
Available-for-sale securities		1,250,173			4,268			1,242,402			3,503
Warrants		1,757			—			—			1,757
Warrants classified as held for sale		1,904			—			—			1,904
Securities classified as held for sale		19,863			3,655			—			16,208

Total assets	$	1,278,697		$	7,923		$	1,247,402		$	23,372


Liabilities:
Forward currency contracts	$	(18,436	)	$	—		$	(18,436	)	$	—
Acquisition related contingent consideration		(464,937	)		(212,042	)		—			(252,895	)

Total liabilities	$	(483,373	)	$	(212,042	)	$	(18,436	)	$	(252,895	)

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

There were no security transfers between Levels I and II in the three-month period ended March 31, 2011. The following tables represent a roll-forward of the fair value of Level 3 instruments (significant unobservable inputs):


	Three-Month Periods Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Assets:
Balance at beginning of period	$	23,372		$	1,598
Amounts acquired or issued		—			—
Net gains (losses) (realized and unrealized)		1,165			—
Settlements		(4,982	)		—
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			—

Balance at end of period	$	19,555		$	1,598


	Three-Month Periods Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Liabilities:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(252,895	)	$	—
Amounts acquired or issued		—			(230,201	)
Net accretion		(6,053	)		(4,862	)
Settlements		—			—
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			—

Balance at end of period	$	(258,948	)	$	(235,063	)

8. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies and to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had settlement dates within 36 months. These foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges and to the extent effective, any unrealized gains or losses on them are reported in other comprehensive income (loss), or OCI, and reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect operations. Any ineffectiveness on these foreign currency forward contracts is reported in other income, net. Foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows at March 31, 2011:


	Notional Amount
Foreign Currency	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010

British Pound	$	44,209	$	58,440
Canadian Dollar		164,839		133,128
Euro		513,872		675,438
Japanese Yen		617,798		632,962
Swiss Franc		71,524		77,669
Others		40,408		54,644

Total	$	1,452,650	$	1,632,281

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company considers the impact of its own and the counterparties’ credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract on an ongoing basis. As of March 31, 2011, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts.

The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized in other income, net in the current period. The aggregate notional amount of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $724.2 million and $848.6 million, respectively.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the consolidated balance sheets for derivative instruments as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


	March 31, 2011
	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
Instrument	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value

Foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedging instruments*	Other current assets	$	7,496	Other current assets	$	—
	Other current liabilities		8,008	Other current liabilities		37,503
	Other non-current assets		—	Other non-current assets		—
	Other non-current liabilities		511	Other non-current liabilities		20,496

Interest rate swap contracts designated as hedging instruments	Other non-current assets		760	Other non-current assets		—

Foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments*	Other current assets		4,512	Other current assets		1,976
	Other current liabilities		1,763	Other current liabilities		13,325


Total		$	23,050		$	73,300


	December 31, 2010
	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
Instrument	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value

Foreign currency forward contracts designated as hedging instruments*	Other current assets	$	23,536	Other current assets	$	1,177
	Other current liabilities		16,656	Other current liabilities		21,645
	Other non-current assets		—	Other non-current assets		—
	Other non-current liabilities		—	Other non-current liabilities		33,824

Foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedging instruments*	Other current assets		8,127	Other current assets		1,976
	Other current liabilities		2,444	Other current liabilities		10,577


Total		$	50,763		$	69,199


*		Derivative instruments in this category are subject to master netting arrangements and are presented on a net basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in accordance with ASC 210-20.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following tables summarize the effect of derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:

March 31, 2011

Location of

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Location of

Amount of

Income on

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Derivative

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

(Ineffective Portion

Recognized in OCI

Accumulated OCI

and Amount Excluded

on Derivative

into Income

From Effectiveness

Instrument

(Effective Portion)

Testing)

Foreign currency forward contracts

(25,955

)(1)

Net product sales

4,569

Other income, net

3,160

(2)

Research and development

—

Interest rate swaps

—

(3)

Interest expense

984


(1)		Losses of $24,107 are expected to be reclassified from Accumulated OCI into operations in the next 12 months.

(2)		The amount of net gain recognized in income represents $80 in losses related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and $3,240 of gains related to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

(3)		The interest rate swaps are designated as fair value hedges of the variability of the fair value of fixed-rate debt due to changes in the long-term benchmark interest rates. The hedged debt is marked to market, offsetting the effect of marking the interest rate swaps to market. As of March 31, 2011, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a $760 unrealized gain which was recorded to other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

March 31, 2010

Location of

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Recognized in

Location of

Amount of

Income on

Amount of

Gain/(Loss)

Derivative

Gain/(Loss)

Reclassified from

(Ineffective Portion

Recognized in OCI

Accumulated OCI

and Amount Excluded

on Derivative

into Income

From Effectiveness

Instrument

(Effective Portion)

Testing)

Foreign currency forward contracts

57,213

Net product sales

213

Other income, net

(1,422

)(1)

Research and development

)


(1)		The amount of net loss recognized in income represents $179 in gains related to the ineffective portion of the hedging relationships and $1,601 of losses related to amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:


		Amount of Gain/(Loss)
		Recognized in
	Location of Gain/(Loss)	Income on Derivative
	Recognized in Income on	March 31,
Instrument	Derivative	2011			2010

Foreign currency forward contracts	Other income, net	$	(28,951	)	$	18,512

The impact of gains and losses on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are generally offset by net foreign exchange gains and losses, which are also included on the Consolidated Statements of Income in other income, net for all periods presented.

The Company hedges the fair value of certain debt obligations through the use of interest rate swap contracts. At March 31, 2011, the Company was a party to three pay-floating, receive-fixed interest rate swap contracts designated as fair value hedges of fixed-rate notes in which the notional amounts match the amount of the hedged fixed-rate notes. The Company has entered into three swaps maturing in 2015, two with notional amounts of $125.0 million each and one with a notional amount of $250.0 million, which effectively convert the Company’s $500.0 million, 2.45% fixed-rate notes due in 2015 to a floating rate. The interest rate swap contracts are designated hedges of the fair value changes in the notes attributable to changes in interest rates. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap match those of the debt being hedged, it is assumed to be a highly effective hedge and all changes in fair value of the swaps will be recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with no net impact recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, any net interest payments made or received are recognized as interest expense.

9. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available-for-Sale

Money market funds of $1.079 billion and $1.050 billion at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were recorded at cost, which approximates fair value and are included in cash and cash equivalents.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities by major security type and class of security at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:


			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
March 31, 2011	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	328,582	$	307	$	(256	)	$	328,633
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities		261,203		852		(99	)		261,956
U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS		219,229		1,320		(676	)		219,873
Non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities		11,199		174		—			11,373
Corporate debt — global (16% AAA/Aaa rated)		120,496		1,031		(152	)		121,375
Marketable equity securities		407		10		—			417

Total available-for-sale marketable securities	$	941,116	$	3,694	$	(1,183	)	$	943,627

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
December 31, 2010	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
U.S. Treasury securities	$	431,913	$	921	$	(378	)	$	432,456
U.S. government-sponsored agency securities		359,060		1,055		(267	)		359,848
U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS		250,618		1,230		(1,332	)		250,516
Non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities		35,382		182		(18	)		35,546
Corporate debt — global (20% AAA/Aaa rated)		167,876		1,002		(1,340	)		167,538
Marketable equity securities		4,050		368		(149	)		4,269

Total available-for-sale marketable securities	$	1,248,899	$	4,758	$	(3,484	)	$	1,250,173

U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, or MBS, includes mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities consist of direct obligations of highly rated governments of nations other than the United States and obligations of sponsored agencies and other entities that are guaranteed or supported by highly rated governments of nations other then the United States. Corporate debt—global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies. Net unrealized gains in the marketable debt securities primarily reflect the impact of decreased interest rates at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Duration periods of available-for-sale debt securities were as follows at March 31, 2011:


	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value

Duration of one year or less	$	230,343	$	230,452
Duration of one through three years		691,419		693,782
Duration of three through five years		18,947		18,976

Total	$	940,709	$	943,210

10. Inventory

A summary of inventories by major category at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 follows:


	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Raw materials	$	41,669	$	37,458
Work in process		98,783		95,822
Finished goods		82,781		126,850

Total	$	223,233	$	260,130

Finished goods inventory balances include the unamortized acquisition accounting step-up to fair value resulting from the acquisition of Abraxis in the amounts of $48.6 million at March 31, 2011 and $90.3 million at December 31, 2010.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

11. Investment in Affiliated Companies

As of March 31, 2011, the Company maintained three equity method investments that it considered to be part of its core business, two of which are limited partnership investment funds. The equity method investments obtained in the acquisition of Abraxis are part of the non-core assets and are included in assets held for sale on the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011. Additional equity method investment contributions, net of investment returns and gains thereon, totaled $1.3 million during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011. A summary of the Company’s equity investment in affiliated companies follows:


	March 31,		December 31,
Investment in Affiliated Companies	2011		2010

Investment in affiliated companies⁽¹⁾	$	24,274	$	21,419
Excess of investment over share of equity ⁽²⁾		1,398		1,654

Investment in affiliated companies	$	25,672	$	23,073


	Three-Month Periods Ended March 31,
Equity in Losses of Affiliated Companies	2011		2010

Affiliated companies (gains) losses ^{(1) (3)}	$	556	$	(741	)


⁽¹⁾		The Company records its interest and share of losses based on its ownership percentage.

⁽²⁾		Consists of goodwill.

⁽³⁾		Affiliated companies losses in 2011 includes $1,845 in losses related to former Abraxis equity method investments.

12. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible Assets: The Company’s intangible assets consist of developed product rights from the Pharmion, Gloucester and Abraxis acquisitions, IPR&D product rights from the Gloucester and Abraxis acquisitions, contract-based licenses, technology and other. The amortization periods related to non-IPR&D intangibles range from two to 17 years. The following summary of intangible assets by category includes intangibles currently being amortized and intangibles not yet subject to amortization:


	Gross					Intangible		Weighted
	Carrying		Accumulated			Assets,		Average
March 31, 2011	Value		Amortization			Net		Life (Years)
Amortizable intangible assets:
Acquired developed product rights	$	1,897,000	$	(451,255	)	$	1,445,745		12.3
Licenses		64,250		(3,231	)		61,019		16.8
Technology and other		40,610		(7,262	)		33,348		8.8

		2,001,860		(461,748	)		1,540,112		12.4

Nonamortized intangible assets:
Acquired IPR&D product rights		1,521,000		—			1,521,000


Total intangible assets	$	3,522,860	$	(461,748	)	$	3,061,112

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)


	Gross					Intangible		Weighted
	Carrying		Accumulated			Assets,		Average
December 31, 2010	Value		Amortization			Net		Life (Years)
Amortizable intangible assets:
Acquired developed product rights	$	1,897,000	$	(384,891	)	$	1,512,109		12.3
Licenses		64,250		(2,271	)		61,979		16.8
Technology and other		40,601		(5,191	)		35,410		8.8

		2,001,851		(392,353	)		1,609,498		12.4

Nonamortized intangible assets:
Acquired IPR&D product rights		1,639,000		—			1,639,000


Total intangible assets	$	3,640,851	$	(392,353	)	$	3,248,498

The $118.0 million decrease in gross carrying value of intangibles at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 was due to an impairment charge related to a change in the probability of obtaining PFS labeling for the treatment of NSCLC with ABRAXANE^® in the United States.

Amortization of intangible assets was $69.4 million and $41.9 million for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization expense in 2011 included $22.6 million from the amortization of intangible assets acquired in the Abraxis acquisition and an increase of $4.9 million from the amortization of intangible assets acquired in the Gloucester acquisition. Assuming no changes in the gross carrying amount of intangible assets, the amortization of intangible assets for the next five years is estimated to be approximately $285.5 million for 2011, $135.4 million for 2012, $133.7 million for 2013, $129.7 million for 2014 and $125.4 million for 2015.

Goodwill: At March 31, 2011, the Company’s goodwill related to the October 2010 acquisition of Abraxis, the January 2010 acquisition of Gloucester, the March 2008 acquisition of Pharmion and the October 2004 acquisition of Penn T Limited.

The change in carrying value of goodwill is summarized as follows:


Balance at December 31, 2010	$	1,896,344
Tax benefit on the exercise of Pharmion converted stock options		(18	)

Balance at March 31, 2011	$	1,896,326

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

13. Long-Term Debt

Summarized below are the carrying values of the Company’s senior notes at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
2.450% senior notes due 2015	$	499,111	$	499,301
3.950% senior notes due 2020		498,774		498,749
5.700% senior notes due 2040		249,535		249,534

Total long-term debt	$	1,247,420	$	1,247,584

On October 7, 2010, the Company issued a total of $1.25 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2015 (the “2015 notes”), $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “2020 notes”) and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.7% Senior Notes due 2040 (the “2040 notes” and, together with the 2015 notes and the 2020 notes, referred to herein as the “notes”). The notes were issued at 99.854%, 99.745% and 99.813% of par, respectively, and the discount is being amortized as additional interest expense over the period from issuance through maturity. Offering costs of approximately $10.5 million have been recorded as debt issuance costs on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and are being amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the period from issuance through maturity. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 each year beginning April 15, 2011 and the principal on each note is due in full at their respective maturity dates. The notes may be redeemed at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price defined in a make-whole clause equaling accrued and unpaid interest plus the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal. If a change of control of the Company occurs accompanied by a downgrade of the debt to below investment grade, the Company will be required to offer to repurchase the notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company is subject to covenants which limit the ability of the Company to pledge properties as security under borrowing arrangements and limit the ability of the Company to perform sale and leaseback transactions involving the property of the Company. At March 31, 2011, the fair value of the Company’s Senior Notes outstanding was $1.199 billion.

The Company entered into interest rate swap contracts in February and March 2011 to convert a portion of its interest rate exposure from fixed rate to floating rate to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on its cash equivalent and investment balances. The floating rate is benchmarked to LIBOR. The swap is designated as a fair value hedge on the fixed-rate debt issue maturing October 2015. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap match those of the debt being hedged, it is assumed to be a highly effective hedge and all changes in fair value of the swaps will be recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with no net impact recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of this filing, the total notional amount of debt hedged with an interest rate swap was $500.0 million.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

14. Share-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes the components of share-based compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010

Cost of good sold	$	2,008	$	1,520
Research and development		32,592		19,129
Selling, general and administrative		23,093		19,931

Total share-based compensation expense		57,693		40,580

Tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense		15,452		9,219

Reduction in income	$	42,241	$	31,361

Included in share-based compensation expense for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was compensation expense related to non-qualified stock options of $37.7 million and $33.9 million, respectively.

Share-based compensation cost included in inventory was $2.7 million and $2.4 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Stock Options: The weighted-average grant date fair value of the stock options granted during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $16.09 per share and $19.28 per share, respectively. There have been no significant changes to the assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to those granted for the year ended December 31, 2010 disclosed in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes all stock option activity for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011:


						Weighted
				Weighted		Average Remaining		Aggregate
				Average Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic Value
	Options			Price Per Option		Term (Years)		(In Thousands)
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		41,137,686		$	48.56		6.7	$	501,663

Changes during the Year:
Granted		2,787,147			53.62
Exercised		(652,795	)		25.03
Forfeited		(341,921	)		56.15
Expired		(143,633	)		64.31

Outstanding at March 31, 2011		42,786,484		$	49.14		6.7	$	445,528


Vested at March 31, 2011 or expected to vest in the future		41,903,330		$	49.01		6.6	$	442,487

Vested at March 31, 2011		21,715,996		$	42.72		4.9	$	365,581

The total fair value of shares vested during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $33.1 million and $27.5 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $19.5 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The Company primarily utilizes newly issued shares to satisfy the exercise of stock options.

As of March 31, 2011, there was $291.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under the plans. That cost will be recognized over an expected remaining weighted-average period of 2.3 years.

Restricted Stock Units: Equity awards may, at the option of employee participants, be divided between stock options and restricted stock units, or RSUs. The employee has three choices: (1) 100% stock options; (2) a mix of stock options and RSUs based on a two-thirds and one-third mix, using a three-to-one ratio of stock options to RSUs in calculating the number of RSUs to be granted; or (3) a mix of stock options and RSUs based on a one-half mix, using a three-to-one ratio of stock options to RSUs in calculating the number of RSUs to be granted. The fair value of RSUs is determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the grant dates. Information regarding the Company’s RSUs for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:


				Weighted
				Average
	Share			Grant Date
Nonvested RSUs	Equivalent			Fair Value

Nonvested at December 31, 2010		1,510,384		$	54.84
Changes during the period:
Granted		232,117			52.89
Vested		(167	)		61.48
Forfeited		(17,233	)		51.46

Non-vested at March 31, 2011		1,725,101		$	54.61

As of March 31, 2011, there was $64.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards of RSUs. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years. The Company recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award, as adjusted for expected forfeitures. The Company primarily utilizes newly issued shares to satisfy the vesting of RSUs.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

15. Income Taxes

The Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of the realization of its deferred tax assets and reduces the carrying amount of those deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance to the extent it believes a portion will not be realized. The Company considers many factors when assessing the likelihood of future realization of its deferred tax assets, including recent cumulative earnings experience by taxing jurisdiction, expectations of future taxable income, the carryforward periods available to it for tax reporting purposes and other relevant factors. Significant judgment is required in making this assessment.

The Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns have been audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, through the year ended December 31, 2005. Tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are currently under examination by the IRS and scheduled to be completed within the next 12 months. The Company is also subject to audits by various state and foreign taxing authorities, including, but not limited to, most U.S. states and major European and Asian countries where the Company has operations.

The Company regularly reevaluates its tax positions and the associated interest and penalties, if applicable, resulting from audits of federal, state and foreign income tax filings, as well as changes in tax law (including regulations, administrative pronouncements, judicial precedents, etc.) that would reduce the technical merits of the position to below more likely than not. The Company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open years. Many factors are considered in making these evaluations, including past history, recent interpretations of tax law and the specifics of each matter. Because tax regulations are subject to interpretation and tax litigation is inherently uncertain, these evaluations can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on estimates and assumptions. The Company applies a variety of methodologies in making these estimates and assumptions, which include studies performed by independent economists, advice from industry and subject experts, evaluation of public actions taken by the IRS and other taxing authorities, as well as the Company’s industry experience. These evaluations are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management. However, if management’s estimates are not representative of actual outcomes, the Company’s results of operations could be materially impacted.

Unrecognized tax benefits, generally represented by liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet and all subject to tax examinations, arise when the estimated benefit recorded in the financial statements differs from the amounts taken or expected to be taken in a tax return because of the uncertainties described above. These unrecognized tax benefits relate primarily to issues common among multinational corporations. Virtually all of these unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would impact the effective income tax rate. The Company accounts for interest and potential penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of its provision for income taxes. Increases to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2011 of approximately $27.0 million relate primarily to current year operations. The Company’s tax returns are under routine examination in many taxing jurisdictions. The scope of these examinations includes, but is not limited to, the review of our taxable presence in a jurisdiction, our deduction of certain items, our claim for research and development credits, our compliance with transfer pricing rules and regulations and the inclusion or exclusion of amounts from our tax returns as filed. Certain of these examinations are scheduled to conclude within the next 12 months. It is reasonably possible that the amount of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could change by a significant amount during the next 12-month period. Finalizing examinations with the relevant taxing authorities can include formal administrative and legal proceedings and, as a result, it is difficult to estimate the timing and range of possible change related to our unrecognized tax benefits. An estimate of the range of the possible change cannot be made until issues are further developed or examinations close.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

16. Collaboration Agreements

Novartis Pharma AG: The Company entered into an agreement with Novartis in which the Company granted to Novartis an exclusive worldwide license (excluding Canada) to develop and market FOCALIN^® (d-methylphenidate, or d -MPH) and FOCALIN XR^®, the long-acting drug formulation for attention deficit disorder, or ADD, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD. The Company also granted Novartis rights to all of its related intellectual property and patents, including formulations of the currently marketed RITALIN LA^®. Under the agreement, the Company is entitled to receive up to $100.0 million in upfront and regulatory achievement milestone payments. To date, the Company has received upfront and regulatory achievement milestone payments totaling $55.0 million. The Company also sells FOCALIN^® to Novartis and also receives royalties of between 30% and 35% on sales of all of Novartis’ FOCALIN XR^{^®}and RITALIN^® family of ADHD-related products.

The agreement will continue until the later of (i) the tenth anniversary of the first commercial launch on a country-by-country basis or (ii) when the last applicable patent expires with respect to that country. At the expiration date, the Company shall grant Novartis a perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to make, have made, use, import and sell d-MPH and Ritalin^® under its technology.

Prior to its expiration as described above, the agreement may be terminated by:

	i.		Novartis at their sole discretion, effective 12 months after written notice to the Company, or

	ii.		by:

either party if the other party materially breaches any of its material obligations under the agreement,

the Company if Novartis fails to pay amounts due under the agreement two or more times in a 12-month period,

either party, on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis, in the event of withdrawal of the d-MPH product or Ritalin^® product from the market because of regulatory mandate,

either party if the other party files for bankruptcy.

If the agreement is terminated by the Company then all licenses granted to Novartis under the agreement will terminate and Novartis will also grant the Company a non-exclusive license to certain of their intellectual property related to the compounds and products.

If the agreement is terminated by Novartis then all licenses granted to Novartis under the agreement will terminate.

If the agreement is terminated by Novartis because of a material breach by the Company, then Novartis can make a claim for damages against the Company and the Company shall grant Novartis a perpetual, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to make, have made, use, import and sell d-MPH and Ritalin^® under the Company’s technology.

When generic versions of long-acting methylphenidate hydrochloride and dexmethylphenidate hydrochloride enter the market, the Company expects Novartis’ sales of Ritalin LA^® and Focalin XR^® products to decrease and therefore its royalties under this agreement to also decrease.

Array BioPharma Inc.: The Company has a research collaboration agreement with Array BioPharma Inc., or Array, focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics in cancer and inflammation. As part of this agreement, the Company made an upfront payment in September 2007 to Array of $40.0 million, which was recorded as research and development expense, in return for an option to receive exclusive worldwide rights for compounds developed against two of the four research targets defined in the agreement, except for Array’s limited U.S. co-promotional rights. In June 2009, the Company made an additional upfront payment of $4.5 million to expand the research targets defined in the agreement, which was recorded as research and development expense. Array will be responsible for all discovery and clinical development through Phase I or Phase IIa and be entitled to receive, for each compound, potential milestone payments of approximately $200.0 million if certain discovery, development and regulatory milestones are achieved, and $300.0 million if certain commercial milestones are achieved as well as royalties on net sales. In 2010, the Company made a $10.0 million discovery milestone payment as required by the collaboration agreement upon the filing and clearance of an investigational new drug application with the FDA.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company’s option will terminate upon the earlier of either a termination of the agreement, the date the Company has exercised its options for compounds developed against two of the four research targets defined in the agreement, or September 21, 2012, unless the term is extended. The Company may unilaterally extend the option term for two additional one-year terms until September 21, 2014 and the parties may mutually extend the term for two additional one-year terms until September 21, 2016. Upon exercise of a Company option, the agreement will continue until the Company has satisfied all royalty payment obligations to Array. Upon the expiration of the agreement, Array will grant the Company a fully paid-up, royalty-free license to use certain intellectual property of Array to market and sell the compounds and products developed under the agreement. The agreement may expire on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis as the Company satisfies its royalty payment obligation with respect to each product in each country.

Prior to its expiration as described above, the agreement may be terminated by:

	(i)		the Company at its sole discretion, or

	(ii)		either party if the other party:

materially breaches any of its material obligations under the agreement, or

files for bankruptcy.

If the agreement is terminated by the Company at its sole discretion or by Array for a material breach by the Company, then the Company’s rights to the compounds and products developed under the agreement will revert to Array. If the agreement is terminated by Array for a material breach by the Company, then the Company will also grant to Array a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to certain intellectual property controlled by the Company necessary to continue the development of such compounds and products. If the agreement is terminated by the Company for a material breach by Array, then, among other things, the Company’s payment obligations under the agreement could be either reduced by 50% or terminated entirely.

Acceleron Pharma: The Company has a worldwide strategic collaboration with Acceleron Pharma, or Acceleron, for the joint development and commercialization of ACE-011, currently being studied for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia, metastatic bone disease and renal anemia. The collaboration combines both companies’ resources and commitment to developing products for the treatment of cancer and cancer-related bone loss. The agreement also includes an option for certain discovery stage programs. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company and Acceleron will jointly develop, manufacture and commercialize Acceleron’s products for bone loss. The Company made an upfront payment to Acceleron in February 2008 of $50.0 million, which included a $5.0 million equity investment in Acceleron, with the remainder recorded as research and development expense. In addition, in the event of an initial public offering of Acceleron, the Company will purchase a minimum of $7.0 million of Acceleron common stock.

Acceleron will retain responsibility for initial activities, including research and development, through the end of Phase IIa clinical trials, as well as manufacturing the clinical supplies for these studies. In turn, the Company will conduct the Phase IIb and Phase III clinical studies and will oversee the manufacture of Phase III and commercial supplies. Acceleron will pay a share of the development expenses and is eligible to receive development, regulatory approval and sales-based milestones of up to $510.0 million for the ACE-011 program and up to an additional $437.0 million for each of the three discovery stage programs. The companies will co-promote the products in North America. Acceleron will receive tiered royalties on worldwide net sales, upon the commercialization of a development compound.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The agreement will continue until the Company has satisfied all royalty payment obligations to Acceleron and the Company has either exercised or forfeited all of its options under the agreement. Upon the Company’s full satisfaction of its royalty payment obligations to Acceleron under the agreement, all licenses granted to the Company by Acceleron under the agreement will become fully paid-up, perpetual, non-exclusive, irrevocable and royalty-free licenses. The agreement may expire on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis as the Company satisfies its royalty payment obligation with respect to each product in each country.

Prior to its expiration as described above, the agreement may be terminated by:

(i)

the Company at its sole discretion, or

(ii)

either party if the other party:

materially breaches any of its material obligations under the agreement, or

files for bankruptcy.

If the agreement is terminated by the Company at its sole discretion or by Acceleron for a material breach by the Company, then all licenses granted to the Company under the agreement will terminate and the Company will also grant to Acceleron a non-exclusive license to certain intellectual property of the Company related to the compounds and products. If the agreement is terminated by the Company for a material breach by Acceleron, then, among other things, (A) the licenses granted to Acceleron under the agreement will terminate, (B) the licenses granted to the Company will continue in perpetuity, (C) all future royalties payable by the Company under the agreement will be reduced by 50% and (D) the Company’s obligation to make any future milestone payments will terminate.

Cabrellis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: The Company, as a result of its acquisition of Pharmion, obtained an exclusive license to develop and commercialize amrubicin in North America and Europe pursuant to a license agreement with Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co. Ltd, or DSP. Pursuant to Pharmion’s acquisition of Cabrellis Pharmaceutics Corp., or Cabrellis, prior to the Company’s acquisition of Pharmion, the Company will pay $12.5 million for each approval of amrubicin in an initial indication by regulatory authorities in the United States and the E.U. to the former shareholders of Cabrellis. Upon approval of amrubicin for a second indication in the United States or the E.U., the Company will pay an additional $10.0 million for each market to the former shareholders of Cabrellis. Under the terms of the license agreement for amrubicin, the Company is required to make milestone payments of $7.0 million and $1.0 million to DSP upon regulatory approval of amrubicin in the United States and upon receipt of the first approval in the E.U., respectively, and up to $17.5 million upon achieving certain annual sales levels in the United States. Pursuant to the supply agreement for amrubicin, the Company is to pay DSP a semiannual supply price calculated as a percentage of net sales for a period of ten years. In September 2008, amrubicin was granted fast-track product designation by the FDA for the treatment of small cell lung cancer after first-line chemotherapy.

The amrubicin license expires on a country-by-country basis and on a product-by-product basis upon the later of (i) the tenth anniversary of the first commercial sale of the applicable product in a given country after the issuance of marketing authorization in such country and (ii) the first day of the first quarter for which the total number of generic product units sold in a given country exceeds 20% of the total number of generic product units sold plus licensed product units sold in the relevant country during the same calendar quarter.

Prior to its expiration as described above, the amrubicin license may be terminated by:

(i)

the Company at its sole discretion,

(ii)

either party if the other party:

materially breaches any of its material obligations under the agreement, or

files for bankruptcy,

(iii)

DSP if the Company takes any action to challenge the title or validity of the patents owned by DSP, or

(iv)

DSP in the event of a change in control of the Company.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

If the agreement is terminated by the Company at its sole discretion or by DSP under circumstances described in clauses (ii)(a) and (iii) above, then the Company will transfer its rights to the compounds and products developed under the agreement to DSP and will also grant to DSP a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free license to certain intellectual property controlled by the Company necessary to continue the development of such compounds and products. If the agreement is terminated by the Company for a material breach by DSP, then, among other things, DSP will grant to the Company an exclusive, perpetual, paid-up license to all of the intellectual property of DSP necessary to continue the development, marketing and selling of the compounds and products subject to the agreement.

GlobeImmune, Inc.: In September 2007, the Company made a $3.0 million equity investment in GlobeImmune, Inc., or GlobeImmune. In April 2009 and May 2009, the Company made additional $0.1 million and $10.0 million equity investments, respectively, in GlobeImmune. In addition, the Company has a collaboration and option agreement with GlobeImmune focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics in cancer. As part of this agreement, the Company made an upfront payment in May 2009 of $30.0 million, which was recorded as research and development expense, to GlobeImmune in return for the option to license compounds and products based on the GI-4000, GI-6200, GI-3000 and GI-10000 oncology drug candidate programs as well as oncology compounds and products resulting from future programs controlled by GlobeImmune. GlobeImmune will be responsible for all discovery and clinical development until the Company exercises its option with respect to a drug candidate program and GlobeImmune will be entitled to receive potential milestone payments of approximately $230.0 million for the GI-4000 program, $145.0 million for each of the GI-6200, GI-3000 and GI-10000 programs and $161.0 million for each additional future program if certain development, regulatory and sales-based milestones are achieved. GlobeImmune will also receive tiered royalties on worldwide net sales.

The Company’s options with respect to the GI-4000, GI-6200, GI-3000 and GI-10000 oncology drug candidate programs will terminate if the Company does not exercise its respective options after delivery of certain reports from GlobeImmune on the completed clinical trials with respect to each drug candidate program, as set forth in the initial development plan specified in the agreement. If the Company does not exercise its options with respect to any drug candidate program or future program, the Company’s option with respect to the oncology products resulting from future programs controlled by GlobeImmune will terminate three years after the last of the options with respect to the GI-4000, GI-6200, GI-3000 and GI-10000 oncology drug candidate programs terminates. Upon exercise of a Company option, the agreement will continue until the Company has satisfied all royalty payment obligations to GlobeImmune. Upon the expiration of the agreement, on a product-by-product, country-by-country basis, GlobeImmune will grant the Company an exclusive, fully paid-up, royalty-free, perpetual license to use certain intellectual property of GlobeImmune to market and sell the compounds and products developed under the agreement. The agreement may expire on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis as the Company satisfies its royalty payment obligation with respect to each product in each country.

Prior to its expiration as described above, the agreement may be terminated by:

(i)

the Company at its sole discretion, or

(ii)

either party if the other party:

materially breaches any of its material obligations under the agreement, or

files for bankruptcy.

If the agreement is terminated by the Company at its sole discretion or by GlobeImmune for a material breach by the Company, then the Company’s rights to the compounds and products developed under the agreement will revert to GlobeImmune. If the agreement is terminated by the Company for a material breach by GlobeImmune, then, among other things, the Company’s royalty payment obligations under the agreement will be reduced by 50%, the Company’s development milestone payment obligations under the agreement will be reduced by 50% or terminated entirely and the Company’s sales milestone payment obligations under the agreement will be terminated entirely.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: On April 14, 2010, the Company entered into a discovery and development collaboration and license agreement with Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Agios, which focuses on cancer metabolism targets and the discovery, development and commercialization of associated therapeutics. As part of the agreement, the Company paid Agios a $121.2 million non-refundable, upfront payment, which was expensed by the Company as research and development in the second quarter of 2010. The Company also made an $8.8 million equity investment in Agios Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, representing approximately a 10.94% ownership interest in Agios and is included in other non-current assets in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company receives an initial period of exclusivity during which it has the option to develop any drugs resulting from the Agios cancer metabolism research platform and may extend this exclusivity period by providing Agios additional funding. The Company has an exclusive option to license any resulting clinical candidates developed during this period and will lead and fund global development and commercialization of certain licensed programs. With respect to each product in a program that the Company chooses to license, Agios could receive up to $120.0 million upon achievement of certain milestones plus royalties on sales, and Agios may also participate in the development and commercialization of certain products in the United States. Agios may also receive a one-time milestone payment of $25.0 million upon dosing of the final human subject in a Phase II study, such payment to be made only once with respect to only one program.

Unless the agreement is earlier terminated or the option term is extended, the Company’s option will terminate on April 14, 2013. However, if certain development targets are not met, the Company may unilaterally extend the option term: (a) for up to an additional one year without payment; (b) subject to certain criteria and upon payment of certain predetermined amounts to Agios, for up to two additional years thereafter.

Following expiration of the option, the agreement will continue in place with respect to programs to which the Company has exercised its option or otherwise is granted rights to develop. The agreement may expire on a product-by-product and country-by-country basis as the Company satisfies its payment obligation with respect to each product in each country. Upon the expiration of the agreement with respect to a product in a country, all licenses granted by one party to the other party for such product in such country shall become fully paid-up, perpetual, sub licensable, irrevocable and royalty-free.

Prior to its expiration as described above, the agreement may be terminated by:

(i)

the Company at its sole discretion after, or

(ii)

either party if the other party:

materially breaches the agreement and fails to cure such breach within the specified period, or

files for bankruptcy.

The party terminating under (i) or (ii)(a) above has the right to terminate on a program-by-program basis, leaving the agreement in effect with respect to remaining programs. If the agreement or any program is terminated by the Company for convenience or by Agios for a material breach or bankruptcy by the Company, then, among other things, depending on the type of program and territorial rights: (a) certain licenses granted by the Company to Agios shall stay in place, subject to Agios’ payment of certain royalties to the Company: and (b) Celgene will grant Agios a non-exclusive, perpetual, royalty-free license to certain technology developed in the conduct of the collaboration and used in the program (which license is exclusive with respect to certain limited collaboration technology). If the agreement or any program is terminated by the Company for a material breach or bankruptcy by Agios, then, among other things, all licenses granted by Celgene to Agios will terminate and: (i) Celgene’s license from Agios will continue in perpetuity and all payment obligations will be reduced or will terminate; (ii) Celgene’s license for certain programs will become exclusive worldwide: and (iii) with regard to any program where the Company has exercised buy-in rights, Agios shall continue to pay certain royalties to Celgene.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Company has determined that Agios is a variable interest entity; however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of Agios. Although the Company would have the right to receive the benefits from the collaboration and license agreement and it is probable that this agreement incorporates the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of Agios for up to six years, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities under the collaboration and license agreement as Agios has the decision-making authority for the Joint Steering Committee and Joint Research Committee until the Company exercises its option to license a product. The Company’s interest in Agios is limited to its 10.94% equity ownership and it does not have any obligations or rights to the future losses or returns of Agios beyond this ownership. The collaboration agreement, including the upfront payment and series B convertible preferred stock investment, does not entitle the Company to participate in future returns beyond the 10.94% ownership and it does not obligate the Company to absorb future losses beyond the $8.8 million investment in Agios Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. In addition, there are no other agreements other than the collaboration agreement that entitle the Company to receive returns beyond the 10.94% ownership or obligate the Company to absorb additional losses.

17. Commitments and Contingencies

Collaboration Arrangements: The Company has entered into certain research and development collaboration agreements, as identified in Note 16, with third parties that include the funding of certain development, manufacturing and commercialization efforts with the potential for future milestone and royalty payments upon the achievement of pre-established developmental, regulatory and/or commercial targets. The Company’s obligation to fund these efforts is contingent upon continued involvement in the programs and/or the lack of any adverse events which could cause the discontinuance of the programs. Due to the nature of these arrangements, the future potential payments are inherently uncertain, and accordingly no amounts have been recorded in the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Contingencies: The Company believes it maintains insurance coverage adequate for its current needs. The Company’s operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations, which impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for the treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. The Company reviews the effects of such laws and regulations on its operations and modifies its operations as appropriate. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC. The FTC requested documents and other information relating to requests by generic companies to purchase the Company’s patented REVLIMID^® and THALOMID^® brand drugs in order to evaluate whether there is reason to believe that the Company has engaged in unfair methods of competition. In the first quarter of 2010, the State of Connecticut referenced the same issues as those referenced in the 2009 CID and issued a subpoena. In the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company received a second CID from the FTC relating to this matter. The Company continues to respond to requests for information.

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company received a letter from the United States Attorney for the Central District of California informing the Company that it was under investigation relating to its promotion of the drugs THALOMID^® and REVLIMID^® regarding off-label marketing and improper payments to physicians. The Company is cooperating with the Unites States Attorney in connection with this investigation.

On January 20, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the jurisdiction of the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, or the PMPRB, extends to sales of drugs to Canadian patients even if the locus of sale is within the United States. As a result of this ruling, the Company’s U.S. sales of THALOMID^® brand drug to Canadian patients under the special access program are subject to PMPRB jurisdiction on and after January 12, 1995. In accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada, we have provided to-date data regarding these special access program sales to the PMPRB. In light of the approval of THALOMID^® brand drug for multiple myeloma by Health Canada on August 4, 2010, this drug is currently sold through the Company’s Canadian entity and is no longer sold to Canadian patients in the United States. The PMPRB’s proposed pricing arrangement has not been determined. Depending on the calculation, the Company may be requested to return certain revenues associated with these sales and to pay fines. Should this occur, the Company would have to consider various legal options to address whether the pricing determination was reasonable.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

18. Legal Proceedings

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are involved in various patent, commercial and other claims; government investigations; and other legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. These legal proceedings and other matters are complex in nature and have outcomes that are difficult to predict and could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Patent proceedings include challenges to scope, validity or enforceability of our patents relating to the Company’s various products or processes. Although the Company believes it has substantial defenses to these challenges with respect to all its material patents, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these matters, and a loss in any of these cases could result in a loss of patent protection for the drug at issue, which could lead to a significant loss of sales of that drug and could materially affect future results of operations.

Among the principal matters pending to which the Company is a party, are the following:

REVLIMID^®

The Company has publicly announced that it has received a notice letter dated August 30, 2010, sent from Natco Pharma Limited of India (“Natco”) notifying it of a Paragraph IV certification alleging that patents listed for REVLIMID^® in the Orange Book are invalid, and/or not infringed (the Notice Letter). The Notice Letter was sent pursuant to Natco having filed an ANDA seeking permission from the FDA to market a generic version of 25mg, 15mg, 10mg and 5mg capsules of REVLIMID^®. Under the federal Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, any generic manufacturer may file an ANDA with a certification (a “Paragraph IV certification”) challenging the validity or infringement of a patent listed in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (the “Orange Book”) four years after the pioneer company obtains approval of its New Drug Application, or an NDA. On October 8, 2010, we filed an infringement action in the United States District Court of New Jersey against Natco in response to the Notice Letter with respect to United States Patent Nos. 5,635,517 (the “’517 patent”), 6,045,501 (the “’501 patent”), 6,281,230 (the “’230 patent”), 6,315,720 (the “’720 patent”), 6,555,554 (the “’554 patent”), 6,561,976 (the “’976 patent”), 6,561,977 (the “’977 patent”), 6,755,784 (the “’784 patent”), 7,119,106 (the “’106 patent”), and 7,465,800 (the “’800 patent”). If Natco is successful in challenging the Company’s patents listed in the Orange Book, and the FDA were to approve the ANDA with a comprehensive education and risk management program for a generic version of lenalidomide, sales of REVLIMID^® could be significantly reduced in the United States by the entrance of a generic lenalidomide product, potentially reducing the Company’s revenue.

Natco responded to the Company’s infringement action on November 18, 2010, with its Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. Natco has alleged (through affirmative defenses and counterclaims) that the patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed by Natco’s proposed generic productions. After filing the infringement action, the Company learned the identity of Natco’s U.S. partner, Arrow International Limited, and filed an amended complaint on January 7, 2011, adding Arrow as a defendant.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

ELAN PHARMA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

As previously disclosed, on February 23, 2011, the parties entered into a settlement and license agreement for $78.0 million, whereby all claims were resolved and the Company obtained the rights to certain patents in and related to the litigation including rights to U.S. Reissue Patent REI 41,884 (the “Reissued Patent”), as well as all foreign counterparts, all of which expire in 2016. Prior to the settlement, on July 19, 2006, Elan Pharmaceutical Int’l Ltd. filed a lawsuit against the predecessor entity of Abraxis (“Old Abraxis”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that Old Abraxis willfully infringed two of its patents by making, using and selling the ABRAXANE^® brand drug. Elan sought unspecified damages and an injunction. In response, Old Abraxis contended that it did not infringe the Elan patents and that the Elan patents are invalid and unenforceable. Before trial, Elan dropped its claim that Old Abraxis infringed one of the two asserted patents. Elan also dropped its request for an injunction as to the remaining patent. On June 13, 2008, after a trial with respect to the remaining patent, a jury ruled that Old Abraxis had infringed that patent, that Abraxis’ infringement was not willful, and that the patent was valid and enforceable. The jury awarded Elan $55.2 million in damages for sales of ABRAXANE^® through the judgment date. For accounting purposes, Abraxis assumed approximately a 6% royalty on all U.S. sales, moving forward from the verdict, of ABRAXANE^® brand drug, plus interest. The patent expired on January 25, 2011. The settlement was accrued for in its entirety as part of the allocation of the purchase price of Abraxis and did not have a material impact on the results of operations, cash flows or financial position of the Company.

ABRAXIS SHAREHOLDER LAWSUIT

Abraxis, the members of the Abraxis board of directors and Celgene Corporation were named as defendants in putative class action lawsuits brought by Abraxis stockholders challenging the Abraxis acquisition in Los Angeles County Superior Court. On September 14, 2010, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the actions. The defendants agreed, among other things, to make additional disclosures relating to the acquisition, and to provide the plaintiffs’ counsel with limited discovery to confirm the fairness and adequacy of the settlement. Additionally, Abraxis, on behalf of itself and for the benefit of the other defendants in the actions, agreed to pay the plaintiffs’ counsel $600,000 for their fees and expenses. Plaintiffs agreed to release all claims against the Company and Abraxis relating to the Company’s acquisition of Abraxis. The settlement was approved by the court on April 25, 2011.

19. Subsequent Events

Sale of Assets Held for Sale

In April 2011, the Company sold certain of the non-core assets obtained by the Company in the Abraxis merger to a number of companies that are owned or controlled by Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, the former majority shareholder and executive chairman of Abraxis. The assets and liabilities included in the sales agreement were classified as assets held for sale and liabilities of disposal group, respectively, in the allocation of the purchase price of Abraxis.

The sales price consists of cash consideration of $110.0 million, 10% equity ownership in an entity to be formed with some of these assets and a future royalty stream based on net sales of certain products of the entity to be formed. The royalties, which commence in 2014 and are not to exceed an annual amount of $128.0 million, will be calculated based on a range between 10% and 12.5% of net sales of certain future products. The valuation of the consideration received has not yet been completed. The Company does not expect any material gain or loss to result from the sale.

CELGENE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Contribution Agreement

In April 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with The Institute for Advanced Health, or the Institute, that included an upfront contribution, future contingent matching contributions and an additional milestone-based contingent payment. The Institute is a non-profit organization dedicated to research and technology development in personalized molecular medicine of which Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company made an initial contribution with a value of $42.0 million. The agreement provides for additional contributions of up to $50.0 million to be made by the Company based on the level of other third-party contributions received by the Institute. A final additional $25.0 million milestone-based payment is contingent upon the Institute achieving specified results related to the collection of DNA data and genomic sequences and the initiation of research and development alliances to be achieved before December 31, 2015. Contributions made under this agreement will be recognized on the Company’s Statement of Income as research and development expense.

As part of the contribution agreement, the Company will receive a right of first offer and a right of last look with respect to all oncology products developed, funded, acquired or licensed by the Institute, the right to designate one of its employees to the Institute’s Scientific Advisory Board and will be the exclusive oncology therapeutics sponsor of the Institute. These rights will continue for as long as the Company continues to make payments under a preexisting agreement.


Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements concerning our business, results of operations, economic performance and financial condition based on our current expectations. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as “forecast,” “project,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “strategy,” “intend,” “potential,” “outlook,” “target,” “seek,” “continue,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “probable,” “should,” “will” or other words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

Executive Summary

Celgene Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively “we”, “our” or “us”) is a global biopharmaceutical company primarily engaged in the discovery, development and commercialization of innovative therapies designed to treat cancer and immune-inflammatory related diseases. We are dedicated to innovative research and development which is designed to bring new therapies to market and is involved in research in several scientific areas that may deliver proprietary next-generation therapies, targeting areas such as intracellular signaling pathways in cancer and immune cells, immunomodulation in cancer and autoimmunity and placental cell, including stem and progenitor cell, research.

Our primary commercial stage products include REVLIMID^®, VIDAZA^®, THALOMID^® (inclusive of Thalidomide Celgene^® and Thalidomide Pharmion^®), ABRAXANE^® and ISTODAX^®. REVLIMID^® is an oral immunomodulatory drug primarily marketed in the United States and select international markets, in combination with dexamethasone, for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy and for the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia due to low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, or MDS, associated with a deletion 5q cytogenetic abnormality with or without additional cytogenetic abnormalities. VIDAZA^®,which is licensed from Pfizer, is a pyrimidine nucleoside analog that has been shown to reverse the effects of DNA hypermethylation and promote subsequent gene re-expression. VIDAZA^® is a Category 1 recommended treatment for patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, or NCCN, and is marketed in the United States for the treatment of all subtypes of MDS. VIDAZA^{^®}was granted orphan drug designation for the treatment of MDS through May 2011. Upon the expiration or loss of regulatory exclusivity for VIDAZA^®, we may quickly lose a significant portion of our sales. We anticipate a generic version of VIDAZA^{^®}to be introduced sometime during 2011. In Europe, VIDAZA^{^®}is marketed for the treatment of certain qualified adult patients and has been granted orphan drug designation for the treatment of MDS and acute myeloid leukemia, or AML. THALOMID^® is marketed for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and for the acute treatment of the cutaneous manifestations of moderate to severe erythema nodosum leprosum, or ENL, an inflammatory complication of leprosy and as maintenance therapy for prevention and suppression of the cutaneous manifestation of ENL recurrence. ABRAXANE^®, which was obtained in the 2010 acquisition of Abraxis BioScience Inc., or Abraxis, is a nanoparticle, albumin-bound paclitaxel that was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. ABRAXANE^® is based on a tumor-targeting platform known as nab^® technology. ISTODAX^®, which was obtained in the 2010 acquisition of Gloucester Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Gloucester, was approved by the FDA for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, or CTCL, in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. ISTODAX^® has received both orphan drug designation for the treatment of non-Hodgkin’s T-cell lymphomas, which includes CTCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, or PTCL, and fast-track status in PTCL from the FDA. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, or EMA, has granted orphan status designation for ISTODAX^® for the treatment of both CTCL and PTCL. We also sell FOCALIN^®, which is approved for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, exclusively to Novartis Pharma AG, or Novartis.

Additional sources of revenue include a licensing agreement with Novartis, which entitles us to royalties on FOCALIN XR^® and the entire RITALIN^® family of drugs and the sale of services through our Cellular Therapeutics subsidiary and other miscellaneous licensing agreements. Through the end of March 2011, we received residual payments from GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, based upon GSK’s ALKERAN^® revenues.

We continue to invest substantially in research and development, and the drug candidates in our pipeline are at various stages of preclinical and clinical development. These candidates include our IMiDs^{^®}compounds, which are a class of compounds proprietary to us and having certain immunomodulatory and other biologically important properties, our leading oral anti-inflammatory agents, cell products and our nanoparticle, albumin-bound compounds. We believe that continued acceptance of our primary commercial stage products, participation in research and development collaboration arrangements, depth of our product pipeline, regulatory approvals of both new products and expanded use of existing products provide the catalysts for future growth.

The following table summarizes total revenue and earnings for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,						Percent
(In thousands $, except earnings per share)	2011		2010		Increase		Change

Total revenue	$	1,125,281	$	791,254	$	334,027		42.2	%
Net income attributable to Celgene	$	255,590	$	234,442	$	21,148		9.0	%
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Celgene	$	0.54	$	0.50	$	0.04		8.0	%

Total revenue increased by $334.0 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to the continued growth of REVLIMID^® and VIDAZA^® in both U.S. and international markets, in addition to sales of ABRAXANE^® subsequent to the acquisition of Abraxis in October 2010. Net income and diluted earnings per share for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 reflect the higher level of revenue, partly offset by additional costs incurred resulting from the acquisition of Abraxis, in addition to increased spending for new product launches and research and development activities.

Results of Operations:

Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

Total Revenue: Total revenue and related percentages for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,				Increase			Percent
(In thousands $)	2011		2010		(Decrease)			Change

Net product sales:
REVLIMID ^®	$	737,870	$	530,466	$	207,404			39.1	%
VIDAZA ^®		163,283		120,345		42,938			35.7	%
THALOMID ^®		85,422		104,017		(18,595	)		-17.9	%
ABRAXANE ^®		74,049		—		74,049			N/A
ISTODAX ^®		5,734		560		5,174			923.9	%
Other		17,251		4,023		13,228			328.8	%

Total net product sales	$	1,083,609	$	759,411	$	324,198			42.7	%
Collaborative agreements and other revenue		9,303		2,380		6,923			290.9	%
Royalty revenue		32,369		29,463		2,906			9.9	%

Total revenue	$	1,125,281	$	791,254	$	334,027			42.2	%

Total revenue increased by $334.0 million, or 42.2%, to $1.125 billion for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, reflecting increases of $190.2 million, or 40.1%, in the United States, and $143.8 million, or 45.4%, in international markets.

Net Product Sales:

Total net product sales for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 increased by $324.2 million, or 42.7%, to $1.084 billion compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The increase was comprised of net volume increases of $357.4 million, price decreases of $36.5 million and the favorable impact from foreign exchange of $3.3 million. The decrease in prices was primarily due to increased Medicaid rebates resulting from the U.S. Health Care Reform Act and an increase in rebates to U.S. and international governments resulting from their attempts to reduce health care costs.

REVLIMID^® net sales increased by $207.4 million, or 39.1%, to $737.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to increased unit sales in both U.S. and international markets. Increased market penetration and the increase in treatment duration of patients using REVLIMID^® in multiple myeloma contributed to U.S. growth. The growth in international markets reflects the expansion of our commercial activities in addition to product reimbursement approvals and the launch of REVLIMID^® in Japan in the latter part of 2010.

VIDAZA^® net sales increased by $42.9 million, or 35.7%, to $163.3 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to increased sales in international markets resulting from the increase in treatment duration of patients using VIDAZA^®.

THALOMID^® net sales decreased by $18.6 million, or 17.9%, to $85.4 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to lower unit volumes in the United States resulting from the increased use of REVLIMID^®.

ABRAXANE^® was obtained in the acquisition of Abraxis in October 2010 and was approved by the FDA in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

ISTODAX^® was obtained in the acquisition of Gloucester in January 2010 and was approved by the FDA for the treatment of CTCL in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. ISTODAX^® was launched in March of 2010.

The “other” net product sales category for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 primarily includes sales of non-core products obtained from the acquisitions of Abraxis and Pharmion, which are to be divested. The “other” net product sales category for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 primarily includes sales of FOCALIN^® and Pharmion products to be divested.

Collaborative Agreements and Other Revenue: Revenues from collaborative agreements and other sources increased by $6.9 million to $9.3 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to receipt of a $6.3 million milestone payment in 2011 related to the approval of VIDAZA^® in Japan and the inclusion of certain manufacturing and management fees in the current year quarter.

Royalty Revenue: Royalty revenue increased by $2.9 million to $32.4 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to an increase in royalties earned from Novartis based upon its FOCALIN XR^® sales, which was partly offset by a decrease in residual payments earned by us based upon GSK’s ALKERAN^® revenues subsequent to the conclusion of the ALKERAN^® license with GSK.

Gross to Net Sales Accruals: We record gross to net sales accruals for sales returns and allowances, sales discounts, government rebates, and chargebacks and distributor service fees.

REVLIMID^® is distributed in the United States primarily through contracted pharmacies under the RevAssist^® program, which is a proprietary risk-management distribution program tailored specifically to help ensure the safe and appropriate distribution and use of REVLIMID^®. Internationally, REVLIMID^® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local competent authorities’ specifications to help ensure the product’s safe and appropriate distribution and use. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. THALOMID^® is distributed in the United States under our “System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety,” or S.T.E.P.S.^®, program which we developed and is a proprietary comprehensive education and risk-management distribution program with the objective of providing for the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID^®. Internationally, THALOMID^® is distributed under mandatory risk-management distribution programs tailored to meet local competent authorities’ specifications to help ensure the safe and appropriate distribution and use of THALOMID^®. These programs may vary by country and, depending upon the country and the design of the risk-management program, the product may be sold through hospitals or retail pharmacies. VIDAZA^®, ISTODAX^® and ABRAXANE^® are distributed through the more traditional pharmaceutical industry supply chain and are not subject to the same risk-management distribution programs as THALOMID^® and REVLIMID^®.

We base our sales returns allowance on estimated on-hand retail/hospital inventories, measured end-customer demand as reported by third-party sources, actual returns history and other factors, such as the trend experience for lots where product is still being returned or inventory centralization and rationalization initiatives conducted by major pharmacy chains, as applicable. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates do not properly reflect future returns, then a change in the allowance would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be materially affected. Under this methodology, we track actual returns by individual production lots. Returns on closed lots, that is, lots no longer eligible for return credits, are analyzed to determine historical returns experience. Returns on open lots, that is, lots still eligible for return credits, are monitored and compared with historical return trend rates. Any changes from the historical trend rates are considered in determining the current sales return allowance. As noted above, REVLIMID^® is distributed primarily through hospitals and contracted pharmacies, lending itself to tighter controls of inventory quantities within the supply channel and, thus, resulting in lower returns activity to date. THALOMID^® is drop-shipped directly to the prescribing pharmacy and, as a result, wholesalers do not stock the product.

Sales discount accruals are based on payment terms extended to customers.

Government rebate accruals are based on estimated payments due to governmental agencies for purchases made by third parties under various governmental programs. U.S. Medicaid rebate accruals are generally based on historical payment data and estimates of future Medicaid beneficiary utilization applied to the Medicaid unit rebate formula established by the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Net revenues for the period ended March 31, 2011 were negatively impacted by two components of the U.S. Health Care Reform Act. The Medicaid Rebate of 23.1% was extended to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations effective March 23, 2010 and was estimated based on historical patient data related to Medicaid Managed Care Organizations. In addition, effective January 1, 2011, manufacturers of pharmaceutical products are responsible for 50% of the patient’s cost of branded prescription drugs related to the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap. In order to estimate the cost to us of this coverage gap responsibility, we analyze data for eligible Medicare Part D enrollee patients against data for eligible Medicare Part D patients treated with our products. We will recognize this expense throughout the year as incurred. In addition, certain international markets have government-sponsored programs that require rebates to be paid based on program specific rules and, accordingly, the rebate accruals are determined primarily on estimated eligible sales. The U.S. Health Care Reform Act of 2010 mandated an annual fee payable by branded prescription drug manufacturers and importers on branded prescription drugs. The fee, which is not material, is included in selling, general and administrative on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Rebates or administrative fees are offered to certain wholesale customers, group purchasing organizations and end-user customers, consistent with pharmaceutical industry practices. Settlement of rebates and fees may generally occur from one to 15 months from date of sale. We provide a provision for rebates at the time of sale based on the contracted rates and historical redemption rates. Assumptions used to establish the provision include level of wholesaler inventories, contract sales volumes and average contract pricing. We regularly review the information related to these estimates and adjust the provision accordingly.

Chargeback accruals are based on the differentials between product acquisition prices paid by wholesalers and lower government contract pricing paid by eligible customers covered under federally qualified programs. Distributor service fee accruals are based on contractual fees to be paid to the wholesale distributor for services provided. TRICARE is a health care program of the U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System that provides civilian health benefits for military personnel, military retirees and their dependents. TRICARE rebate accruals are based on estimated Department of Defense eligible sales multiplied by the TRICARE rebate formula.

See Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of gross to net sales accruals.

Gross to net sales accruals and the balance in the related allowance accounts for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:


	Returns									Chargebacks
	and						Government			and Distributor
(In thousands $) 2011	Allowances			Discounts			Rebates			Service Fees			Total

Balance at December 31, 2010	$	4,779		$	8,272		$	84,964		$	47,367		$	145,382
Allowances for sales during prior periods		—			—			—			2,084			2,084
Allowances for sales during 2011		1,527			17,100			64,038			38,849			121,514
Credits/deductions issued for prior year sales		(1,381	)		(4,803	)		(30,180	)		(25,205	)		(61,569	)
Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2011		(466	)		(9,771	)		(3,539	)		(19,024	)		(32,800	)

Balance at March 31, 2011	$	4,459		$	10,798		$	115,283		$	44,071		$	174,611


	Returns									Chargebacks
	and						Government			and Distributor
(In thousands $) 2010	Allowances			Discounts			Rebates			Service Fees			Total

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	7,360		$	3,598		$	18,111		$	29,241		$	58,310
Allowances for sales during 2010		6,036			10,878			17,160			27,270			61,344
Credits/deductions issued for prior year sales		(2,579	)		(937	)		(7,894	)		(11,105	)		(22,515	)
Credits/deductions issued for sales during 2010		(803	)		(9,432	)		(5,335	)		(12,964	)		(28,534	)

Balance at March 31, 2010	$	10,014		$	4,107		$	22,042		$	32,442		$	68,605

A comparison of allowances for sales within each of the four categories noted above for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 follows:

Returns and allowances decreased by $4.5 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to reduced U.S. provisions resulting from decreased revenue from products with higher return rates.

Discounts increased by $6.2 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to revenue increases in the United States and international markets, both of which offer different discount programs, and expansion into new international markets.

Government rebates increased by $46.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to an approximate $26.2 million increase in Medicaid rebates and costs associated with the Medicare Part D coverage gap resulting from the Health Care Reform Act, $20.2 million from reimbursement rate increases in certain international markets and approvals in new markets and the inclusion of ABRAXANE^® sales subsequent to the October 2010 acquisition of Abraxis.

Chargebacks and distributor service fees increased by $13.7 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. Chargebacks increased by $10.5 million primarily due to $4.3 million in chargebacks related to ABRAXANE^® and an increase in chargebacks related to VIDAZA^® ($2.2 million as a result of increased sales and a $2.1 million charge related to disputed claims from 2010). Additionally, distributor service fees increased by approximately $3.2 million primarily due to the inclusion of ABRAXANE^®.

Operating Costs and Expenses: Operating costs, expenses and related percentages for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,									Percent
(Amounts in thousands)	2011			2010			Increase			Change

Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets)	$	127,268		$	61,915		$	65,353			105.6	%
Percent of net product sales		11.7	%		8.2	%

Research and development	$	435,478		$	204,657		$	230,821			112.8	%
Percent of total revenue		38.7	%		25.9	%

Selling, general and administrative	$	302,261		$	207,978		$	94,283			45.3	%
Percent of total revenue		26.9	%		26.3	%

Amortization of acquired intangible assets	$	69,050		$	41,593		$	27,457			66.0	%

Acquisition related (gains) charges	$	(96,744	)	$	4,862		$	(101,606	)		N/A

Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets): Cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased by $65.4 million to $127.3 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the inclusion of a $41.7 million inventory step-up amortization adjustment related to sales of ABRAXANE^® subsequent to the acquisition of Abraxis, in addition to increased sales activity. As a percent of net product sales, cost of goods sold (excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets) increased to 11.7% in the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to 8.2% for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to the inventory step-up amortization for ABRAXANE^®. Excluding the step-up adjustment, the cost of goods sold ratio for 2010 was 7.9%.

Research and Development: Research and development expenses increased by $230.8 million to $435.5 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, partly due to a $118.0 million impairment charge to the in-process research and development, or IPR&D acquired intangible asset related to a change in the probability of obtaining progression free survival labeling for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer for ABRAXANE^® in the United States and an increase in research and development project spending in support of multiple programs across a broad range of diseases. In addition, the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 included $49.1 million in expenses related to the Abraxis business acquired in October 2010.

The following table provides a breakdown of research and development expenses:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
(In thousands $)	2011		2010		Increase

Human pharmaceutical clinical programs	$	171,806	$	100,418	$	71,388
Other pharmaceutical programs (1)		217,864		73,057		144,807
Drug discovery and development		40,467		26,242		14,225
Placental stem cell		5,341		4,940		401

Total	$	435,478	$	204,657	$	230,821


(1)		Other pharmaceutical programs for 2011 includes a $118,000 impairment charge to the in-process research and development intangible asset related to the Abraxis acquisition.

Research and development expenditures support multiple ongoing clinical proprietary development programs for REVLIMID^âandother IMiDs^â compounds; VIDAZA^â; ABRAXANE^â in melanoma, non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancers; ISTODAX^â for treatment of CTCL and PTCL; ABI compounds, which are targeted nanoparticle, albumin-bound compounds for treatment of solid tumor cancers; amrubicin, our lead compound for small cell lung cancer; apremilast (CC-10004), our lead anti-inflammatory compound that inhibits multiple proinflammatory mediators and which is currently being evaluated in Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis; pomalidomide, which is currently being evaluated in Phase I, II and III clinical trials; CC-11050, for which Phase II clinical trials are planned; our kinase inhibitor programs; as well as our cell therapy programs.

Selling, General and Administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $94.3 million to $302.3 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, partly due to a $22.3 million increase in donations to non-profit foundations and higher marketing and sales related expenses due to ongoing product launch activities, including REVLIMID^â in Japan, VIDAZA^â in Europe and ISTODAX^â in the United States. In addition, the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 included $13.6 million in expenses related to the Abraxis business acquired in October 2010.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets: Amortization of acquired intangible assets is summarized below for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,				Increase
(In thousands $)	2011		2010		(Decrease)

Abraxis acquisition	$	22,563	$	—	$	22,563
Gloucester acquisition		6,550		1,656		4,894
Pharmion acquisition		39,937		39,937		—


Total amortization	$	69,050	$	41,593	$	27,457

Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased by $27.5 million to $69.1 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to the October 2010 acquisition of Abraxis and a full quarter’s amortization related to the January 2010 acquisition of Gloucester being included in the 2011 three-month period.

Acquisition Related (Gains) Charges and Restructuring, net: Acquisition related (gains) charges and restructuring, net was a net gain of $96.7 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 and a net charge of $4.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The net gain in 2011 was due to a $105.6 million favorable adjustment to the fair value of our liability related to publicly traded contingent value rights, or CVRs, that were issued as part of the acquisition of Abraxis, partly offset by a $6.1 million accretion in contingent liabilities related to the Gloucester acquisition and $2.8 million in additional costs related to the Abraxis acquisition.

Interest and Investment Income, Net: Interest and investment income, net decreased by $9.6 million to $4.5 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a $6.3 million net reduction in gains on sales of marketable securities and a $4.2 million reduction in interest income due to lower overall yields and the liquidation of securities to fund the Abraxis acquisition, partly offset by a $0.9 million net decrease in the amortization of costs related to the purchase of marketable securities.

Equity in Losses of Affiliated Companies: Under the equity method of accounting, we recorded a loss of $0.6 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 and a gain of $0.7 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The loss for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 included $1.8 million in losses from non-core former Abraxis equity method investments.

Interest Expense: Interest expense increased by $11.3 million to $11.8 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, reflecting the interest accrued on the $1.25 billion in senior notes issued in October 2010.

Other income, net: Other income, net increased by $2.9 million to $6.6 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to an increase in net gains on foreign currency forward contracts that had not been designated as hedges entered into in order to offset net foreign exchange gains and losses.

Income Tax Provision: The income tax provision decreased by $22.2 million to $31.7 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The March 31, 2011 effective tax rate of 11.1% reflects the impact from our low tax Swiss manufacturing operations, the favorable impact of a shift in projected earnings between the U.S. and lower tax foreign jurisdictions, and tax deductions related to our acquisitions. The decrease in the effective tax rate reflects benefits from an increase in acquisition related charges, including an IPR&D asset impairment charge of $118.0 million, and a non-taxable gain from a decrease in the fair value of our liability under the CVR agreement related to the acquisition of Abraxis of $105.6 million.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:


	Three-Month Periods Ended
	March 31,
(In thousands $)	2011			2010			Change

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	275,270		$	284,650		$	(9,380	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	275,622		$	(363,551	)	$	639,173
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	(426,928	)	$	43,897		$	(470,825	)

Operating Activities: Net cash provided by operating activities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 decreased by $9.4 million to $275.3 million as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to payments for the Elan settlement, accounts payable and other compensation accruals, partially offset by the expansion of our operations and related increase in net earnings.

Investing Activities: Net cash provided by investing activities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 increased by $639.2 million to $275.6 million as compared to a net cash use of $363.6 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The increase in net cash provided by investing activities was principally related to proceeds from the net sales of marketable securities during the three-month period as well as the net cash used in the 2010 period for the acquisition of Gloucester of $337.6 million. Net sales of marketable securities available for sale amounted to $300.6 million during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to net purchases of $3.8 million in the three-month period ended March 31, 2010.

Financing Activities: Net cash used in financing activities for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 was $426.9 million compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $43.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The $470.8 million increase in net cash used in financing activities in 2011 was primarily attributable to $450.0 million of cash used for the repurchase of our common stock as well as a decrease in the amount of net proceeds from the exercise of common stock options and their associated tax benefits.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, Marketable Securities Available for Sale and Working Capital: Cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities available for sale and working capital as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:


	March 31,		December 31,
(In thousands $)	2011		2010		(Decrease)

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale	$	2,430,619	$	2,601,301	$	(170,682	)
Working capital (1)	$	2,731,889	$	2,835,427	$	(103,538	)


(1)		Includes cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale, accounts receivable, net of allowances, inventory and other current assets, less accounts payable, accrued expenses, income taxes payable and other current liabilities.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities Available for Sale: We invest our excess cash primarily in money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities and global corporate debt securities. All liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents and all investments with maturities of greater than three months from the date of purchase are classified as marketable securities available for sale. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments in marketable debt and equity securities at the time of purchase. The $170.7 million decrease in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities available for sale at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 was primarily due to the $450.0 million cash paid out under our share repurchase program announced in April 2009, partly offset by cash generated from operations.

Accounts Receivable, Net: Accounts receivable, net increased by $97.6 million to $804.0 million as of March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010, primarily due to increased U.S. and international sales of REVLIMID^® and VIDAZA^® among existing customers as well as new customers in countries we have recently entered. Days of sales outstanding at March 31, 2011 increased to 66 days compared to 59 days at December 31, 2010. The increase in days of sales outstanding was primarily due to increased international sales in countries where payment terms are typically greater than 60 days, thereby extending collection periods beyond those in the United States. We expect this trend to continue as our international sales continue to expand.

Inventory: Inventory balances decreased by $36.9 million to $223.2 million at March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010, primarily due to a $41.7 million reduction in ABRAXANE^® inventory related to the inventory step-up adjustment to fair value resulting from the acquisition of Abraxis, which flowed through cost of goods sold during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011.

Other Current Assets: Other current assets decreased by $29.1 million to $246.0 million as of March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 primarily due to a reduction in prepaid expenses, decrease in the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts and a decrease in prepaid royalties related to VIDAZA^® sales.

Accounts Payable, Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities: Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased by $32.1 million to $963.9 million as of March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to payments for the Elan settlement, accounts payable and other compensation accruals, partly offset by increases in governmental rebates and Medicaid reimbursements, changes in the fair value of foreign currency forward derivative contracts and an increase in accrued interest expense.

Income Taxes Payable (Current and Non-Current): Income taxes payable increased by $23.7 million to $587.0 million as of March 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 primarily from the current provision for income taxes of $96.6 million, mostly offset by tax payments of $33.0 million, a reduction of prepaid income taxes of $32.1 million and a tax benefit of stock options of $5.7 million.

We expect continued growth in our expenditures, particularly those related to research and development, clinical trials, commercialization of new products, international expansion and capital investments. However, we anticipate that existing cash and cash equivalent balances and marketable securities available for sale, combined with cash generated from future net product sales, will provide sufficient capital resources to fund our normal operations for the foreseeable future.

Financial Condition

At March 31, 2011, our marketable securities available for sale consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities, global corporate debt securities and a marketable equity security. U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, or MBS, includes mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities, consist of direct obligations of highly rated governments of nations other than the United States, obligations of sponsored agencies and other entities that are guaranteed or supported by highly rated governments of nations other than the United States. Corporate debt–global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations, including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies.

Marketable securities available for sale are carried at fair value, held for an unspecified period of time and are intended for use in meeting our ongoing liquidity needs. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, which are deemed to be temporary, are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, net of tax. The cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. The amortization, along with realized gains and losses and other than temporary impairment charges, is included in interest and investment income, net.

As of March 31, 2011, our financial assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value. We have classified our financial assets and liabilities as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Fair values determined based on Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Our Level 1 assets consist of marketable equity securities, including equity securities obtained from the acquisition of Abraxis in October 2010. Fair values determined based on Level 2 inputs utilize observable quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and observable quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not very active. Our Level 2 assets consist primarily of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities, global corporate debt securities and forward currency contracts. Fair values determined based on Level 3 inputs utilize unobservable inputs and include valuations of assets or liabilities for which there is little, if any, market activity. Our Level 3 asset securities consist of warrants for the purchase of equity securities in non-publicly traded companies, an investment in common shares of a small biopharmaceutical company and debt securities obtained from the acquisition of Abraxis. Our Level 1 liability relates to publicly traded CVRs. Our Level 3 liabilities consist of a contingent consideration related to undeveloped product rights resulting from the Gloucester acquisition.

A majority of our financial assets and liabilities have been classified as Level 2. These assets and liabilities were initially valued at the transaction price and subsequently valued based on inputs utilizing observable quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and observable quoted prices from identical or similar assets in markets that are not very active.

Contractual Obligations

For a discussion of our contractual obligations, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes to such contractual obligations or potential milestone payments since December 31, 2010 aside from those disclosed in Note 17.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Significant Accounting Policies

A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operation and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our critical accounting estimates are disclosed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes to such significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates since December 31, 2010.


Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The following discussion provides forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our potential exposure to market risk. Market risk represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in the value of financial instruments. The risk of loss is assessed based on the likelihood of adverse changes in fair values, cash flows or future earnings.

We have established guidelines relative to the diversification and maturities of investments to maintain safety and liquidity. These guidelines are reviewed periodically and may be modified depending on market conditions. Although investments may be subject to credit risk, our investment policy specifies credit quality standards for our investments and limits the amount of credit exposure from any single issue, issuer or type of investment. At March 31, 2011, our market risk sensitive instruments consisted of marketable securities available for sale, our long-term debt, our note payable and certain foreign currency forward contracts.

Marketable Securities Available for Sale: At March 31, 2011, our marketable securities available for sale consisted of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, U.S. government-sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities, global corporate debt securities and marketable equity securities. U.S. government-sponsored agency securities include general unsecured obligations either issued directly by or guaranteed by U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises. U.S. government-sponsored agency MBS include mortgage backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. Non-U.S. government, agency and Supranational securities consist of direct obligations of highly rated governments of nations other than the United States, obligations of sponsored agencies and other entities that are guaranteed or supported by highly rated governments of nations other than the United States. Corporate debt–global includes obligations issued by investment-grade corporations including some issues that have been guaranteed by governments and government agencies.

As of March 31, 2011, the principal amounts, fair values and related weighted-average interest rates of our investments in debt securities classified as marketable securities available for sale were as follows:


	Duration
	Less than
(In thousands $)	1 Year			1 to 3 Years			3 to 5 Years			Total

Principal amount	$	226,104		$	681,874		$	18,346		$	926,324
Fair value	$	230,452		$	693,782		$	18,976		$	943,210
Average interest rate		0.7	%		1.1	%		2.1	%		1.0	%

Long-Term Debt: On October 7, 2010, we issued a total of $1.25 billion principal amount of senior notes consisting of $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2.45% Senior Notes due 2015, $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.95% Senior Notes due 2020 and $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.7% Senior Notes due 2040. The notes were issued at 99.854%, 99.745% and 99.813% of par, respectively, and the discount amortized as additional interest expense over the period from issuance through maturity. Offering costs of approximately $10.5 million have been recorded as debt issuance costs on our consolidated balance sheet and are amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the period from issuance through maturity. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 each year beginning April 15, 2011 and the principal on each note is due in full at their respective maturity dates. The notes may be redeemed at our option, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price defined in a make-whole clause equaling accrued and unpaid interest plus the greater of 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of interest and principal. If we experience a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the debt to below investment grade, we will be required to offer to repurchase the notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. We are subject to covenants which limit our ability to pledge properties as security under borrowing arrangements and limit our ability to perform sale and leaseback transactions involving our property. At March 31, 2011, the fair value of our senior notes outstanding was $1.199 billion.

Note Payable: In December 2006, we purchased an active pharmaceutical ingredient, or API, manufacturing facility and certain other assets and liabilities from Siegfried. At March 31, 2011, the fair value of our note payable to Siegfried approximated the carrying value of the note of $25.9 million. Assuming other factors are held constant, an increase in interest rates generally will result in a decrease in the fair value of the note. The note is denominated in Swiss francs and its fair value will also be affected by changes in the U.S. dollar / Swiss franc exchange rate. The carrying value of the note reflects the U.S. dollar / Swiss franc exchange rate and Swiss interest rates.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts: We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge specific forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies and to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to protect against changes in anticipated foreign currency cash flows resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily associated with non-functional currency denominated revenues and expenses of foreign subsidiaries. The foreign currency forward hedging contracts outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 had settlement dates within 36 months. These foreign currency forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815 and, accordingly, to the extent effective, any unrealized gains or losses on them are reported in other comprehensive income (loss), or OCI, and reclassified to operations in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect operations. Any ineffectiveness on these foreign currency forward contracts is reported in other income, net. Foreign currency forward contracts entered into to hedge forecasted revenue and expenses were as follows:


	Notional Amount
	March 31,		December 31,
(In thousands $)	2011		2010
Foreign Currency:
British Pound	$	44,209	$	58,440
Canadian Dollar		164,839		133,128
Euro		513,872		675,438
Japanese Yen		617,798		632,962
Swiss Franc		71,524		77,669
Others		40,408		54,644

Total	$	1,452,650	$	1,632,281

We consider the impact of our own and the counterparties’ credit risk on the fair value of the contracts as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract. As of December 31, 2010, credit risk did not materially change the fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts.

We recognized an increase in net product sales for certain effective cash flow hedge instruments of $4.6 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 and an increase in net product sales of $0.2 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. These settlements were recorded in the same period as the related forecasted sales occurred. Changes in time value, which we excluded from the hedge effectiveness assessment, were included in other income, net.

We also enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce exposures to foreign currency fluctuations of certain recognized assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. These foreign currency forward contracts have not been designated as hedges under ASC 815 and, accordingly, any changes in their fair value are recognized in other income, net in the current period resulting in losses of $29.0 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011 compared to a gain of $18.5 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2010. The aggregate notional amount of the foreign currency forward non-designated hedging contracts outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $724.2 million and $848.6 million, respectively.

Although not predictive in nature, we believe a hypothetical 10% threshold reflects a reasonably possible near-term change in foreign currency rates. Assuming that the March 31, 2011 exchange rates were to change by a hypothetical 10%, the fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts would change by approximately $224.3 million. However, since the contracts either hedge specific forecasted intercompany transactions denominated in foreign currencies or relate to assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the entities’ functional currencies, any change in the fair value of the contract would be either reported in other comprehensive income and reclassified to earnings in the same periods during which the underlying hedged transactions affect earnings or re-measured through earnings each period along with the underlying asset or liability.

We entered into interest rate swap contracts in February and March 2011 to convert a portion of our interest rate exposure from fixed rate to floating rate to more closely align interest expense with interest income received on its cash equivalent and investment balances. The floating rate is benchmarked to LIBOR. The swap is designated as a fair value hedge on the fixed-rate debt issue maturing October 2015. Since the specific terms and notional amount of the swap match those of the debt being hedged, it is assumed to be a highly effective hedge and all changes in fair value of the swaps will be recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets with no net impact recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of this filing, the total notional amount of debt hedged with an interest rate swap is $500.0 million. Although not predictive in nature, we believe a hypothetical 100 basis points in short-term and long-term interest rates would decrease the fair value of our interest rate swaps by $25.8 million, excluding the effects of counterparty credit risk and, if realized, would affect earnings over the remaining life of the swaps.


Item 4.		Controls and Procedures

	(a)		Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), or the Exchange Act). Based upon the foregoing evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

			There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.		Legal Proceedings

The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by reference to Note 18 included in Part I, Item 1, Unaudited Financial Statements — Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


ITEM 1A.		RISK FACTORS

The following statements describe the major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. Any of these factors could significantly and negatively affect our business, prospects, financial condition, operating results or credit ratings, which could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. The risks described below are not the only risks we may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or risks that we currently consider immaterial, could also negatively affect our business, our results and operations.

We may experience significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results which could cause our financial results to be below expectations and cause our stock price to be volatile.

We have historically experienced, and may continue to experience, significant fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. These fluctuations are due to a number of factors, many of which are outside our control, and may result in volatility of our stock price. Future operating results will depend on many factors, including:

	•		demand or lack of demand for our products, including demand that adversely affects our ability to optimize the use of our manufacturing facilities;

	•		the introduction and pricing of products competitive with ours, including generic competition;

	•		developments regarding the safety or efficacy of our products;

	•		regulatory approvals for our products and pricing determinations with respect to our products;

	•		regulatory approvals for our and our competitor’s manufacturing facilities;

	•		timing and levels of spending for research and development, sales and marketing;

	•		timing and levels of reimbursement from third-party payers for our products;

	•		development or expansion of business infrastructure in new clinical and geographic markets;

	•		the acquisition of new products and companies;

	•		tax rates in the jurisdictions in which we operate;

	•		timing and recognition of certain research and development milestones and license fees;

	•		ability to control our costs;

	•		fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; and

	•		economic and market instability.

We are dependent on the continued commercial success of our primary products REVLIMID^®, VIDAZA^®, THALOMID^® and ABRAXANE^® and a significant decline in demand for or use of these products or our other commercially available products could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

During the next several years, the growth of our business will be largely dependent on the commercial success of REVLIMID^®, VIDAZA^®, THALOMID^®, and ABRAXANE^®. We cannot predict whether these or our other existing or new products will be accepted by regulators, physicians, patients and other key opinion leaders as effective drugs with certain advantages over existing or future therapies. We are continuing to introduce our products in additional international markets and to obtain approvals for additional indications both in the United States and internationally. A delay in gaining the requisite regulatory approvals for these markets or indications could negatively impact our growth plans and the value of our stock.

Further, if unexpected adverse experiences are reported in connection with the use of our products, physician and patient comfort with the product could be undermined, the commercial success of such productscould be adversely affected and the acceptance of our other products could be negatively impacted. We are subject to adverse event reporting regulations that require us to report to the FDA or similar bodies in other countries if our products are associated with a death or serious injury. These adverse events, among others, could result in additional regulatory controls, such as the performance of costly post-approval clinical studies or revisions to our approved labeling, which could limit the indications or patient population for our products or could even lead to the withdrawal of a product from the market. Similarly, the occurrence of serious adverse events known or suspected to be related to the products could negatively impact product sales. For example, THALOMID^® is known to be toxic to the human fetus and exposure to the drug during pregnancy could result in significant deformities in the baby. REVLIMID^® is also considered fetal toxic and there are warnings against use of VIDAZA^® in pregnant women as well. While we have restricted distribution systems for both THALOMID^® and REVLIMID^® and we endeavor to educate patients regarding the potential known adverse events including pregnancy risks, we cannot ensure that all such warnings and recommendations will be complied with or that adverse events resulting from non-compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

It is necessary that our primary products achieve and maintain market acceptance as well as our other products including ISTODAX^®, FOCALIN XR^® and the RITALIN^® family of drugs. A number of factors may adversely impact the degree of market acceptance of our products, including the products’ efficacy, safety and advantages, if any, over competing products, as well as the reimbursement policies of third-party payers, such as government and private insurance plans, patent disputes and claims about adverse side effects.

If we do not gain or maintain regulatory approval of our products we will be unable to sell our current products and products in development.

Changes in law, government regulations or policies can have a significant impact on our results of operations. The discovery, preclinical development, clinical trials, manufacturing, risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (such as our S.T.E.P.S.^® and RevAssist^® programs), marketing and labeling of pharmaceuticals and biologics are all subject to extensive laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the U.S. Public Health Service Act, Medicare Modernization Act, Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, patent laws, environmental laws, privacy laws and other federal and state statutes, including anti-kickback, antitrust and false claims laws, as well as similar laws in foreign jurisdictions. Enforcement of and changes in laws, government regulations or policies can have a significant adverse impact on our ability to continue to commercialize our products or introduce new products to the market, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

If we or our agents, contractors or collaborators are delayed in receiving, or are unable to obtain all, necessary governmental approvals, we will be unable to effectively market our products.

The testing, marketing and manufacturing of our products requires regulatory approval, including approval from the FDA and, in some cases, from the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, or governmental authorities outside of the United States that perform roles similar to those of the FDA and EPA, including the EMA, EC, the Swissmedic, the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration and Health Canada. Certain of our pharmaceutical products, such as FOCALIN^®, fall under the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 that requires authorization by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, or DEA, of the U.S. Department of Justice in order to handle and distribute these products.

The regulatory approval process presents a number of risks to us, principally:

	•		In general, preclinical tests and clinical trials can take many years, and require the expenditure of substantial resources, and the data obtained from these tests and trials can be susceptible to varying interpretation that could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval;

	•		Delays or rejections may be encountered during any stage of the regulatory process based upon the failure of the clinical or other data to demonstrate compliance with, or upon the failure of the product to meet, a regulatory agency’s requirements for safety, efficacy and quality or, in the case of a product seeking an orphan drug indication, because another designee received approval first or receives approval of other labeled indications;

	•		Requirements for approval may become more stringent due to changes in regulatory agency policy, or the adoption of new regulations or legislation;

	•		The scope of any regulatory approval, when obtained, may significantly limit the indicated uses for which a product may be marketed and reimbursed and may impose significant limitations in the nature of warnings, precautions and contra-indications that could materially affect the sales and profitability of the drug;

	•		Approved products, as well as their manufacturers, are subject to continuing and ongoing review, and discovery of previously unknown problems with these products or the failure to adhere to manufacturing or quality control requirements may result in restrictions on their manufacture, sale or use or in their withdrawal from the market;

	•		Regulatory authorities and agencies of the United States or foreign governments may promulgate additional regulations restricting the sale of our existing and proposed products, including specifically tailored risk evaluation and mitigation strategies;

	•		Guidelines and recommendations published by various governmental and non-governmental organizations can reduce the use of our products;

	•		Once a product receives marketing approval, we may not market that product for broader or different applications, and the FDA may not grant us approval with respect to separate product applications that represent extensions of our basic technology. In addition, the FDA may withdraw or modify existing approvals in a significant manner or promulgate additional regulations restricting the sale of our present or proposed products. The FDA may also request that we perform additional clinical trials or change the labeling of our existing or proposed products if we or others identify side effects after our products are on the market;

	•		Products, such as REVLIMID^®, that are subject to accelerated approval can be subject to an expedited withdrawal if the post-marketing study commitments are not completed with due diligence, the post-marketing restrictions are not adhered to or are shown to be inadequate to assure the safe use of the drug, or evidence demonstrates that the drug is not shown to be safe and effective under its conditions of use. Additionally, promotional materials for such products are subject to enhanced surveillance, including pre-approval review of all promotional materials used within 120 days following marketing approval and a requirement for the submissions 30 days prior to initial dissemination of all promotional materials disseminated after 120 days following marketing approval; and

	•		Our risk evaluation and mitigation strategies, labeling and promotional activities relating to our products as well as our post-marketing activities are regulated by the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission, The United States Department of Justice, the DEA, state regulatory agencies and foreign regulatory agencies and are subject to associated risks. In addition, individual states, acting through their attorneys general, have become active as well, seeking to regulate the marketing of prescription drugs under state consumer protection and false advertising laws. If we fail to comply with regulations regarding the promotion and sale of our products, appropriate distribution of our products under our restricted distribution systems, prohibition on off-label promotion and the promotion of unapproved products, such agencies may bring enforcement actions against us that could inhibit our commercial capabilities as well as result in significant penalties.

Other matters that may be the subject of governmental or regulatory action which could adversely affect our business include:

	•		changes in laws and regulations, including without limitation, patent, environmental, privacy, health care and competition laws;

	•		importation of prescription drugs from outside the U.S. at prices that are regulated by the governments of various foreign countries;

	•		additional restrictions on interactions with healthcare professionals; and

	•		privacy restrictions that may limit our ability to share data from foreign jurisdictions.

We collect placentas and umbilical cord blood for our unrelated allogeneic and private stem cell banking businesses. The FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research currently regulates human tissue or cells intended for transplantation, implantation, infusion or transfer to a human recipient under 21 CFR Parts 1270 and 1271. Part 1271 requires cell and tissue establishments to screen and test donors, to prepare and follow written procedures for the prevention of the spread of communicable disease and to register the establishment with FDA. This part also provides for inspection by the FDA of cell and tissue establishments. The FDA recently announced that as of October 21, 2011, a BLA will be required to distribute cord blood for unrelated allogeneic use. Currently, we are required to be, and are, licensed to operate in New York, New Jersey, Maryland and California. If other states adopt similar licensing requirements, we would need to obtain such licenses to continue operating our stem cell banking businesses. If we are delayed in receiving, or are unable to obtain at all, necessary licenses, we will be unable to provide services in those states and this could impact negatively on our revenues.

Sales of our products will be significantly reduced if access to and reimbursement for our products by governmental and other third-party payers is reduced or terminated.

Sales of our products will depend, in part, on the extent to which the costs of our products will be paid by health maintenance, managed care, pharmacy benefit and similar health care management organizations, or reimbursed by government health administration authorities, private health coverage insurers and other third-party payers. Generally, in Europe and other countries outside the United States, the government-sponsored healthcare system is the primary payer of healthcare costs of patients. These health care management organizations and third-party payers are increasingly challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. Additionally, the newly enacted Health Care Reform Act has provided sweeping health care reform, which may impact the prices of drugs. In addition to the newly enacted federal legislation, state legislatures and foreign governments have also shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. The establishment of limitations on patient access to our drugs, adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures in new jurisdictions or programs, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, including the impact of the Health Care Reform Act, could adversely impact our business and future results. If these organizations and third-party payers do not consider our products to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not reimburse providers or consumers of our products or, if they do, the level of reimbursement may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a profitable basis.

Our ability to sell our products to hospitals in the United States depends in part on our relationships with group purchasing organizations, or GPOs. Many existing and potential customers for our products become members of GPOs. GPOs negotiate pricing arrangements and contracts, sometimes on an exclusive basis, with medical supply manufacturers and distributors, and these negotiated prices are made available to a GPO’s affiliated hospitals and other members. If we are not one of the providers selected by a GPO, affiliated hospitals and other members may be less likely to purchase our products, and if the GPO has negotiated a strict sole source, market share compliance or bundling contract for another manufacturer’s products, we may be precluded from making sales to members of the GPO for the duration of the contractual arrangement. Our failure to renew contracts with GPOs may cause us to lose market share and could have a material adverse effect on our sales, financial condition and results of operations. We cannot assure you that we will be able to renew these contracts at the current or substantially similar terms. If we are unable to keep our relationships and develop new relationships with GPOs, our competitive position may suffer.

We encounter similar regulatory and legislative issues in most countries outside the United States. International operations are generally subject to extensive governmental price controls and other market regulations, and we believe the increasing emphasis on cost-containment initiatives in Europe and other countries has and will continue to put pressure on the price and usage of our products. Although we cannot predict the extent to which our business may be affected by future cost-containment measures or other potential legislative or regulatory developments, additional foreign price controls or other changes in pricing regulation could restrict the amount that we are able to charge for our current and future products, which could adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.

Our long-term success depends, in part, on intellectual property protection.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and enforce patents, protect trade secrets, obtain licenses to technology owned by third parties and to conduct our business without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, including ours, can be uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions including those related to our risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (such as our S.T.E.P.S.^® and RevAssist^® programs). In addition, the coverage sought in a patent application can be significantly reduced before the patent is issued.

Consequently, we do not know whether any of our owned or licensed pending patent applications, which have not already been allowed, will result in the issuance of patents or, if any patents are issued, whether they will be dominated by third-party patent rights, whether they will provide significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage or whether they will be circumvented, opposed, invalidated, rendered unenforceable or infringed by others. Further, we are aware of third-party U.S. patents that relate to, for example, the use of certain stem cell technologies and cannot be assured as to any impact to our potential products, or guarantee that our patents or pending applications will not be involved in, or be defeated as a result of, opposition proceedings before a foreign patent office or any interference proceedings before the United States Patent & Trademark Office, or PTO.

With respect to patents and patent applications we have licensed-in, there can be no assurance that additional patents will be issued to any of the third parties from whom we have licensed patent rights, or that, if any new patents are issued, such patents will not be opposed, challenged, invalidated, infringed or dominated or provide us with significant proprietary protection or commercial advantage. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any of the existing licensed patents will provide us with proprietary protection or commercial advantage. Nor can we guarantee that these licensed patents will not be either infringed, invalidated or circumvented by others, or that the relevant agreements will not be terminated. Any termination of material licenses granted to us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Because 1) patent applications filed in the United States on or before November 28, 2000 are maintained in secrecy until patents issue, 2) patent applications filed in the United States on or after November 29, 2000 are not published until approximately 18 months after their earliest claimed priority date, 3) United States patent applications that are not filed outside the United States may not publish at all until issued, and 4) publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we, or our licensors, were the first to make the inventions covered by each of the issued patents or pending patent applications or that we, or our licensors, were the first to file patent applications for such inventions. In the event a third party has also filed a patent for any of our inventions, we, or our licensors, may have to participate in interference proceedings before the PTO to determine priority of invention, which could result in the loss of a U.S. patent or loss of any opportunity to secure U.S. patent protection for the invention. Even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us, such interference proceedings could result in substantial cost to us.

We may in the future have to prove that we are not infringing patents or we may be required to obtain licenses to such patents. However, we do not know whether such licenses will be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Prosecution of patent applications and litigation to establish the validity and scope of patents, to assert patent infringement claims against others and to defend against patent infringement claims by others can be expensive and time-consuming. There can be no assurance that, in the event that claims of any of our owned or licensed patents are challenged by one or more third parties, any court or patent authority ruling on such challenge will determine that such patent claims are valid and enforceable. An adverse outcome in such litigation could

cause us to lose exclusivity relating to the subject matter delineated by such patent claims and may have a material adverse effect on our business. If a third party is found to have rights covering products or processes used by us, we could be forced to cease using the products or processes covered by the disputed rights, be subject to significant liabilities to such third party and/or be required to license technologies from such third party. Also, different countries have different procedures for obtaining patents, and patents issued by different countries provide different degrees of protection against the use of a patented invention by others. There can be no assurance, therefore, that the issuance to us in one country of a patent covering an invention will be followed by the issuance in other countries of patents covering the same invention or that any judicial interpretation of the validity, enforceability or scope of the claims in a patent issued in one country will be similar to the judicial interpretation given to a corresponding patent issued in another country. Competitors have chosen and in the future may choose to file oppositions to patent applications, which have been deemed allowable by foreign patent examiners. Furthermore, even if our owned or licensed patents are determined to be valid and enforceable, there can be no assurance that competitors will not be able to design around such patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology. Additionally, for these same reasons, we cannot be sure that patents of a broader scope than ours may be issued and thereby create freedom to operate issues. If this occurs we may need to reevaluate pursuing such technology, which is dominated by others’ patent rights, or alternatively, seek a license to practice our own invention, whether or not patented.

We also rely upon unpatented, proprietary and trade secret technology that we seek to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our collaborative partners, employees, consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors. There can be no assurance that these agreements provide meaningful protection or that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any such breach or that our trade secrets, proprietary know-how and technological advances will not otherwise become known to others. In addition, there can be no assurance that, despite precautions taken by us, others have not and will not obtain access to our proprietary technology or that such technology will not be found to be non-proprietary or not a trade secret.

Our products may face competition from lower cost generic or follow-on products and providers of these products may be able to sell them at a substantially lower cost than us.

Generic drug manufacturers are seeking to compete with our drugs, and present an important challenge to us. Even if our patent applications, or those we have licensed-in, are issued, innovative and generic drug manufacturers and other competitors may challenge the scope, validity or enforceability of such patents in court, requiring us to engage in complex, lengthy and costly litigation. Alternatively, innovative and generic drug manufacturers and other competitors may be able to design around our owned or licensed patents and compete with us using the resulting alternative technology. If any of our issued or licensed patents are infringed or challenged, we may not be successful in enforcing or defending our or our licensor’s intellectual property rights and subsequently may not be able to develop or market the applicable product exclusively.

Upon the expiration or loss of patent protection for one of our products, or upon the “at-risk” launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation against the generic product) by a generic manufacturer of a generic version of one of our products, we can quickly lose a significant portion of our sales of that product, which can adversely affect our business. In addition, if generic versions of our competitors’ branded products lose their market exclusivity, our patented products may face increased competition which can adversely affect our business.

The FDA approval process allows for the approval of an ANDA or 505(b)(2) application for a generic version of our approved products upon the expiration, through passage of time or successful legal challenge, of relevant patent or non-patent exclusivity protection. Generic manufacturers pursuing ANDA approvals are not required to conduct costly and time-consuming clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of their products; rather, they are permitted to rely on the innovator’s data regarding safety and efficacy. Thus, generic manufacturers can sell their products at prices much lower than those charged by the innovative pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies who have incurred substantial expenses associated with the research and development of the drug product. Accordingly, while our products currently may retain certain regulatory and or patent exclusivity, our products are or will be subject to ANDA applications to the FDA in light of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The ANDA procedure includes provisions allowing generic manufacturers to challenge the effectiveness of the innovator’s patent protection prior to the generic manufacturer actually commercializing their products—the so-called “Paragraph IV” certification procedure. In recent years, generic manufacturers have used Paragraph IV certifications extensively to challenge the applicability of Orange Book-listed patents on a wide array of innovative pharmaceuticals, and we expect this trend to continue and to implicate drug products with even relatively modest revenues. During the exclusivity periods, the FDA is generally prevented from granting effective approval of an ANDA. Upon the expiration of the applicable exclusivities, through passage of time or successful legal challenge, the FDA may grant effective approval of an ANDA for a generic drug, or may accept reference to a previously protected NDA in a 505(b)(2) application. Further, upon such expiration event, the FDA may require a generic competitor to participate in some form of risk management system which could include our participation as well. Depending upon the scope of the applicable exclusivities, any such approval could be limited to certain formulations and/or indications/claims, i.e., those not covered by any outstanding exclusivities.

If an ANDA filer or a generic manufacturer were to receive approval to sell a generic or follow-on version of one of our products, that product would become subject to increased competition and our revenues for that product would be adversely affected.

We have received a Paragraph IV Certification Letter dated August 30, 2010, advising us that Natco Pharma Limited of Hyderabad, India, or Natco, submitted an ANDA to the FDA. See Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings — REVLIMID^®” of this report for further discussion.

If we are not able to effectively compete our business will be adversely affected.

The pharmaceutical and biotech industry in which we operate is highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. Our present and potential competitors include major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as specialty pharmaceutical firms, including, but not limited to:

	•		Takeda and Johnson & Johnson, which compete with REVLIMID^® and THALOMID^{^®}in the treatment of multiple myeloma and in clinical trials with our compounds;

	•		Eisai Co., Ltd., SuperGen, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, which compete or may potentially compete with VIDAZA^®, in addition Eisai Co., Ltd. potentially competes with ABRAXANE^®, and in other oncology products in general;

	•		Amgen, which potentially competes with our TNF-α and kinase inhibitors;

	•		AstraZeneca plc, which potentially competes in clinical trials with our compounds and TNF-α inhibitors;

	•		Biogen Idec Inc. and Genzyme Corporation, both of which are generally developing drugs that address the oncology and immunology markets;

	•		Bristol Myers Squibb Co., which potentially competes with ABRAXANE^®, and in clinical trials with our compounds and TNF-α inhibitors, in addition to other oncology products in general;

	•		F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., which potentially competes in clinical trials with our IMiDs^® compounds and TNF-α inhibitors, in addition to other oncology products in general;

	•		Johnson & Johnson, which potentially competes with certain of our proprietary programs, including our oral anti-inflammatory programs;

	•		Abbott Laboratories, which potentially competes with our oral anti-inflammatory programs;

	•		Novartis, which potentially competes with our compounds and kinase programs;

	•		Pfizer, which potentially competes in clinical trials with our kinase inhibitors; and

	•		Sanofi-Aventis, which competes with ABRAXANE^®, in addition to other oncology products in general.

Many of these companies have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. This enables them, among other things, to make greater research and development investments and spread their research and development costs, as well as their marketing and promotion costs, over a broader revenue base. Our competitors may also have more experience and expertise in obtaining marketing approvals from the FDA, and other regulatory authorities. We also experience competition from universities and other research institutions, and in some instances, we compete with others in acquiring technology from these sources. The pharmaceutical industry has undergone, and is expected to continue to undergo, rapid and significant technological change, and we expect competition to intensify as technical advances in the field are made and become more widely known. The development of products, including generics, or processes by our competitors with significant advantages over those that we are seeking to develop could cause the marketability of our products to stagnate or decline.

We may be required to modify our business practices, pay fines and significant expenses or experience losses due to litigation or governmental investigations.

From time to time, we may be subject to litigation or governmental investigation on a variety of matters, including, without limitation, regulatory, intellectual property, product liability, antitrust, consumer, whistleblower, commercial, securities and employment litigation and claims and other legal proceedings that may arise from the conduct of our business as currently conducted or as conducted in the future.

In particular, we are subject to significant product liability risks as a result of the testing of our products in human clinical trials and for products that we sell after regulatory approval.

Pharmaceutical companies involved in Hatch-Waxman litigation are often subject to follow-on lawsuits and governmental investigations, which may be costly and could result in lower-priced generic products that are competitive with our products being introduced to the market.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, we received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or the FTC. The FTC requested documents and other information relating to requests by generic companies to purchase our patented REVLIMID^® and THALOMID^® brand drugs in order to evaluate whether there is reason to believe that we have engaged in unfair methods of competition. In the first quarter of 2010, the State of Connecticut referenced the same issues as those referenced in the 2009 CID and issued a subpoena. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we received a second CID from the FTC relating to this matter. We continue to respond to requests for information.

In the first quarter of 2011, we received a letter from the United States Attorney for the Central District of California informing us that we were under investigation relating to our promotion of the drugs THALOMID^® and REVLIMID^® regarding off-label marketing and improper payments to physicians. We are cooperating with the Unites States Attorney in connection with this investigation.

On January 20, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the jurisdiction of the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, or the PMPRB, extends to sales of drugs to Canadian patients even if the locus of sale is within the United States. This means that our U.S. sales of THALOMID^® brand drug to Canadian patients under the special access program are subject to PMPRB jurisdiction from and after January 12, 1995. In accordance with the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada, we have provided to-date data regarding these special access program sales to the PMPRB. In light of the approval of THALOMID^® brand drug for multiple myeloma by Health Canada on August 4, 2010, this drug is now sold through our Canadian entity and is no longer sold to Canadian patients in the United States. The PMPRB’s proposed pricing arrangement has not been determined. Depending on the calculation, we may be requested to return certain revenues associated with these sales and to pay fines. Should this occur, we would have to consider various legal options to address whether the pricing determination was reasonable.

Litigation and governmental investigations are inherently unpredictable and may:

	•		result in rulings that are materially unfavorable to us, including claims for significant damages, fines or penalties, and administrative remedies, such as exclusion and/or debarment from government programs, or other rulings that prevent us from operating our business in a certain manner;

	•		cause us to change our business operations to avoid perceived risks associated with such litigation or investigations;

	•		have an adverse affect on our reputation and the demand for our products; and

	•		require the expenditure of significant time and resources, which may divert the attention of our management and interfere with the pursuit of our strategic objectives.

While we maintain insurance for certain risks, the amount of our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover the total amount of all insured claims and liabilities. It also is not possible to obtain insurance to protect against all potential risks and liabilities. If any litigation or governmental investigation were to have a material adverse result, there could be a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See also Legal Proceedings contained in Part II, Item 1 of this report.

The development of new biopharmaceutical products involves a lengthy and complex process, and we may be unable to commercialize any of the products we are currently developing.

Many of our drug candidates are in the early or mid-stages of research and development and will require the commitment of substantial financial resources, extensive research, development, preclinical testing, clinical trials, manufacturing scale-up and regulatory approval prior to being ready for sale. This process involves a high degree of risk and takes many years. Our product development efforts with respect to a product candidate may fail for many reasons, including the failure of the product candidate in preclinical studies; adverse patient reactions to the product candidate or indications or other safety concerns; insufficient clinical trial data to support the effectiveness or superiority of the product candidate; our inability to manufacture sufficient quantities of the product candidate for development or commercialization activities in a timely and cost-efficient manner; our failure to obtain, or delays in obtaining, the required regulatory approvals for the product candidate, the facilities or the process used to manufacture the product candidate; or changes in the regulatory environment, including pricing and reimbursement, that make development of a new product or of an existing product for a new indication no longer desirable. Moreover, our commercially available products may require additional studies with respect to approved indications as well as new indications pending approval.

The stem cell products that we are developing through our CCT subsidiary may represent substantial departures from established treatment methods and will compete with a number of traditional products and therapies which are now, or may be in the future, manufactured and marketed by major pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies. Furthermore, public attitudes may be influenced by claims that stem cell therapy is unsafe, and stem cell therapy may not gain the acceptance of the public or the medical community.

Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in conducting clinical studies, we can give no assurances that our studies will have a positive result or that we will receive regulatory approvals for our new products or new indications.

Manufacturing and distribution risks including a disruption at certain of our manufacturing and distribution sites would significantly interrupt our production capabilities, which could result in significant product delays and adversely affect our results.

We have our own manufacturing facilities for many of our products and we have contracted with third-party manufacturers and distributors to provide API, encapsulation, finishing services packaging and distribution services to meet our needs. These risks include the possibility that our or our suppliers’ manufacturing processes and distribution channels could be partially or completely disrupted by a fire, natural disaster, terrorist attack, governmental action or military action. In the case of a disruption, we may need to establish alternative manufacturing sources for these products. This would likely lead to substantial production delays as we build or locate replacement facilities and seek and obtain the necessary regulatory approvals. If this occurs, and our finished goods inventories are insufficient to meet demand, we may be unable to satisfy customer orders on a timely basis, if at all. Further, our business interruption insurance may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur and we would have to bear the additional cost of any disruption. For these reasons, a significant disruptive event at certain of our manufacturing facilities or sites could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. In addition, if we fail to predict market demand for our products, we may be unable to sufficiently increase production capacity to satisfy demand or may incur costs associated with excess inventory that we manufacture.

In all the countries where we sell our products, governmental regulations exist to define standards for manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution and storing. All of our suppliers of raw materials, contract manufacturers and distributors must comply with these regulations as applicable. In the United States, the FDA requires that all suppliers of pharmaceutical bulk material and all manufacturers of pharmaceuticals for sale in or from the United States achieve and maintain compliance with the FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practice regulations and guidelines. Our failure to comply, or failure of our third-party manufacturers to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on them or us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, disgorgement, suspension or withdrawal of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect supplies of our products. In addition, before any product batch produced by our manufacturers can be shipped, it must conform to release specifications pre-approved by regulators for the content of the pharmaceutical product. If the operations of one or more of our manufacturers were to become unavailable for any reason, any required FDA review and approval of the operations of an alternative supplier could cause a delay in the manufacture of our products.

If our outside manufacturers do not meet our requirements for quality, quantity or timeliness, or do not achieve and maintain compliance with all applicable regulations, our ability to continue supplying such products at a level that meets demand could be adversely affected.

We have contracted with specialty distributors, to distribute REVLIMID^®, THALOMID^®, VIDAZA^®, ABRAXANE^® and ISTODAX^® in the United States. If our distributors fail to perform and we cannot secure a replacement distributor within a reasonable period of time, we may experience adverse effects to our business and results of operations.

We are continuing to establish marketing and distribution capabilities in international markets with respect to our products. At the same time, we are in the process of obtaining necessary governmental and regulatory approvals to sell our products in certain countries. If we have not successfully completed and implemented adequate marketing and distribution support services upon our receipt of such approvals, our ability to effectively launch our products in these countries would be severely restricted.

The consolidation of drug wholesalers and other wholesaler actions could increase competitive and pricing pressures on pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us.

We sell our pharmaceutical products in the United States primarily through wholesale distributors and contracted pharmacies. These wholesale customers comprise a significant part of the distribution network for pharmaceutical products in the United States. This distribution network is continuing to undergo significant consolidation. As a result, a smaller number of large wholesale distributors and pharmacy chains control a significant share of the market. We expect that consolidation of drug wholesalers and pharmacy chains will increase competitive and pricing pressures on pharmaceutical manufacturers, including us. In addition, wholesalers may apply pricing pressure through fee-for-service arrangements, and their purchases may exceed customer demand, resulting in reduced wholesaler purchases in later quarters. We cannot assure you that we can manage these pressures or that wholesaler purchases will not decrease as a result of this potential excess buying.

Risks from the improper conduct of employees, agents or contractors or collaborators could adversely affect our business or reputation.

We cannot ensure that our compliance controls, policies and procedures will in every instance protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators that would violate the laws or regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including without limitation, employment, foreign corrupt practices, environmental, competition and privacy laws. Such improper actions could subject us to civil or criminal investigations, monetary and injunctive penalties and could adversely impact our ability to conduct business, results of operations and reputation.

The integration of Abraxis and other acquired businesses may present significant challenges to us.

We may face significant challenges in effectively integrating entities and businesses that we acquire, such as Abraxis, and we may not realize the benefits anticipated from such acquisitions. Achieving the anticipated benefits of our acquisition of Abraxis will depend in part upon whether we can integrate our businesses in an efficient and effective manner. Our integration of Abraxis involves a number of risks, including, but not limited to:

•		demands on management related to the increase in our size after the acquisition;

•		the diversion of management’s attention from the management of daily operations to the integration of operations;

•		higher integration costs than anticipated;

•		failure to achieve expected synergies and costs savings;

•		difficulties in the assimilation and retention of employees;

•

difficulties in the assimilation of different cultures and practices, as well as in the assimilation of broad and geographically dispersed personnel and operations; and

•

difficulties in the integration of departments, systems, including accounting systems, technologies, books and records, and procedures, as well as in maintaining uniform standards, controls, including internal control over financial reporting required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related procedures and policies.

If we cannot successfully integrate Abraxis we may experience material negative consequences to our business, financial condition or results of operations. Successful integration of Abraxis will depend on our ability to manage these operations, to realize opportunities for revenue growth presented by offerings and expanded geographic market coverage and, to some degree, to eliminate redundant and excess costs. Because of difficulties in combining geographically distant operations, we may not be able to achieve the benefits that we hope to achieve as a result of the acquisition with Abraxis.

Our inability to continue to attract and retain key leadership, managerial, commercial and scientific talent could adversely affect our business.

The success of our business depends, in large part, on our continued ability to (i) attract and retain highly qualified management, scientific, manufacturing and commercial personnel, (ii) successfully integrate large numbers of new employees into our corporate culture and (iii) develop and maintain important relationships with leading research and medical institutions and key distributors. Competition for these types of personnel and relationships is intense.

Among other benefits, we use share-based compensation to attract and retain personnel. Share-based compensation accounting rules require us to recognize all share-based compensation costs as expenses. These or other factors could reduce the number of shares and options management and our board of directors grants under our incentive plan. We cannot be sure that we will be able to attract or retain skilled personnel or maintain key relationships, or that the costs of retaining such personnel or maintaining such relationships will not materially increase.

We could be subject to significant liability as a result of risks associated with using hazardous materials in our business.

We use certain hazardous materials in our research, development, manufacturing and general business activities. While we believe we are currently in substantial compliance with the federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use of these materials, we cannot be certain that accidental injury or contamination will not occur. If an accident or environmental discharge occurs, or if we discover contamination caused by prior operations, including by prior owners and operators of properties we acquire, we could be liable for cleanup obligations, damages and fines. This could result in substantial liabilities that could exceed our insurance coverage and financial resources. Additionally, the cost of compliance with environmental and safety laws and regulations may increase in the future, requiring us to expend more financial resources either in compliance or in purchasing supplemental insurance coverage.

Changes in our effective income tax rate could adversely affect our results of operations.

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and various foreign jurisdictions, and our domestic and international tax liabilities are dependent upon the distribution of income among these different jurisdictions. Various factors may have favorable or unfavorable effects on our effective income tax rate. These factors include, but are not limited to, interpretations of existing tax laws, the accounting for stock options and other share-based compensation, changes in tax laws and rates, future levels of research and development spending, changes in accounting standards, changes in the mix of earnings in the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate, the outcome of examinations by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other jurisdictions, the accuracy of our estimates for unrecognized tax benefits and realization of deferred tax assets, and changes in overall levels of pre-tax earnings. The impact on our income tax provision resulting from the above-mentioned factors may be significant and could have an impact on our results of operations.

Currency fluctuations and changes in exchange rates could increase our costs and may cause our profitability to decline.

We collect and pay a substantial portion of our sales and expenditures in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Therefore, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates affect our operating results.

We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to manage foreign currency risk, but not to engage in currency speculation. We use these forward contracts to hedge certain forecasted transactions and balance sheet exposures denominated in foreign currencies. We use derivative instruments, including those not designated as part of a hedging transaction, to manage our exposure to movements in foreign exchange rates. The use of these derivative instruments mitigates the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce our risk or cost but may not fully offset any change in operating results that result from fluctuations in foreign currencies. Any significant foreign exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

We may experience an adverse market reaction if we are unable to meet our financial reporting obligations.

As we continue to expand at a rapid pace, the development of new and/or improved automated systems will remain an ongoing priority. During this expansion period, our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements in our financial reporting. Such misstatements may result in litigation and/or negative publicity and possibly cause an adverse market reaction that may negatively impact our growth plans and the value of our common stock.

A decline of global economic conditions could adversely affect our results of operations.

Sales of our products are dependent, in large part, on reimbursement from government health administration authorities, private health insurers, distribution partners and other organizations. As a result of global credit and financial market conditions, these organizations may be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations or may delay payment. In addition, U.S. federal and state health authorities may reduce Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements, and private insurers may increase their scrutiny of claims. A reduction in the availability or extent of reimbursement could negatively affect our product sales, revenue and cash flows.

Due to tightened global credit, there may be a disruption or delay in the performance of our third-party contractors, suppliers or collaborators. We rely on third parties for several important aspects of our business, including portions of our product manufacturing, royalty revenue, clinical development of future collaboration products, conduct of clinical trials and raw materials. If such third parties are unable to satisfy their commitments to us, our business could be adversely affected.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly and you may lose some or all of your investment in us.

The market for our shares of common stock may be subject to conditions that could cause volatility in its price. The following key factors may have an adverse impact on the market price of our common stock:

	•		results of our clinical trials or adverse events associated with our marketed products;

	•		fluctuations in our commercial and operating results;

	•		announcements of technical or product developments by us or our competitors;

	•		market conditions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology stocks in particular;

	•		stock market conditions generally;

	•		changes in governmental regulations and laws, including, without limitation, changes in tax laws, health care legislation, environmental laws, competition laws, and patent laws;

	•		new accounting pronouncements or regulatory rulings;

	•		public announcements regarding medical advances in the treatment of the disease states that we are targeting;

	•		patent or proprietary rights developments;

	•		changes in pricing and third-party reimbursement policies for our products;

	•		the outcome of litigation involving our products or processes related to production and formulation of those products or uses of those products;

	•		other litigation or governmental investigations;

	•		competition; and

	•		investor reaction to announcements regarding business or product acquisitions.

In addition, our operations may be materially affected by conditions in the global markets and economic conditions throughout the world. The global market and economic climate may deteriorate because of many factors beyond our control, including economic instability and market volatility, sovereign debt issues, rising interest rates or inflation, terrorism or political uncertainty. In the event of a market downturn in general and/or the biopharmaceutical sector in particular, the market price of our common stock may be adversely affected.

Our business could be adversely affected if we are unable to service our obligations under our recently incurred indebtedness.

On October 7, 2010, we issued a total of $1.25 billion principal amount of senior notes, consisting of the 2015 notes, the 2020 notes and the 2040 notes, collectively referred to as the notes. Our ability to pay interest on the notes, to repay the principal amount of the notes when due at maturity, to comply with the covenants of the notes or to repurchase the notes if a change of control occurs will depend upon, among other things, continued commercial success of our products and other factors that affect our future financial and operating performance, including, without limitation, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business, and regulatory factors, many of which are beyond our control.

If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service the debt service requirements under the notes, we may be forced to take actions such as:

	•		restructuring or refinancing our debt, including the notes;

	•		seeking additional debt or equity capital;

	•		reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions, investments or capital expenditures; or

	•		selling assets.

Such measures might not be successful and might not enable us to service our obligations under the notes. In addition, any such financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available on economically favorable terms.

A breakdown or breach of our information technology systems could subject us to liability or interrupt the operation of our business.

We rely upon our information technology systems and infrastructure for our business. The size and complexity of our computer systems make them potentially vulnerable to breakdown, malicious intrusion and random attack. Likewise, data privacy breaches by employees and others who access our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. While we believe that we have taken appropriate security measures to protect our data and information technology systems, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent breakdowns or breaches in our systems that could adversely affect our business.

We have certain charter and by-law provisions that may deter a third-party from acquiring us and may impede the stockholders’ ability to remove and replace our management or board of directors.

Our board of directors has the authority to issue, at any time, without further stockholder approval, up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, and to determine the price, rights, privileges and preferences of those shares. An issuance of preferred stock could discourage a third-party from acquiring a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Additionally, our board of directors has adopted certain amendments to our by-laws intended to strengthen the board’s position in the event of a hostile takeover attempt. These provisions could impede the stockholders’ ability to remove and replace our management and/or board of directors. Furthermore, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an anti-takeover law, which may also dissuade a potential acquirer of our common stock.

In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, CVR holders are subject to additional risks.

On October 15, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Abraxis BioScience, Inc. and in connection with our acquisition, contingent value rights, or CVRs, were issued under a CVR agreement entered into by and between us and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, the trustee. A copy of the CVR agreement was filed on Form 8-A with the SEC on October 15, 2010. Pursuant to the CVR agreement, each holder of a CVR is entitled to receive a pro rata portion, based on the number of CVRs then outstanding, of certain milestone and net sales payments, each of the following cash payments that we are obligated to pay. See Note 3, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report.

In addition to the risks relating to our common stock, CVR holders are subject to additional risks, including:

	•		an active public market for the CVRs may not develop or the CVRs may trade at low volumes, both of which could have an adverse effect on the resale price, if any, of the CVRs;

	•		because a public market for the CVRs has a limited history, the market price and trading volume of the CVRs may be volatile;

	•		if the clinical approval milestones specified in the CVR agreement are not achieved for any reason within the time periods specified therein, and if net sales do not exceed the thresholds set forth in the CVR agreement for any reason within the time periods specified therein, no payment will be made under the CVRs and the CVRs will expire valueless;

	•		since the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the CVRs is unclear, any part of any CVR payment could be treated as ordinary income and required to be included in income prior to the receipt of the CVR payment;

	•		any payments in respect of the CVRs are subordinated to the right of payment of certain indebtedness of ours;

	•		we may under certain circumstances redeem the CVRs; and

	•		upon expiration of our obligations to use diligent efforts to achieve each of the CVR milestones and to sell ABRAXANE^® or any of the other Abraxis pipeline products, we may discontinue such efforts, which would have an adverse effect on the value, if any, of the CVRs.


Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table presents the total number of shares purchased during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase program and the approximate dollar value of shares that still could have been purchased:


							Maximum Number (or
					Total Number of		Approximate Dollar
					Shares (or Units)		Value) of Shares (or
	Total Number of				Purchased as Part of		Units) that may yet be
	Shares (or Units)		Average Price Paid per		Publicly Announced		Purchased Under the
Period	Purchased		Share (or Unit)		Plans or Programs		Plans or Programs

January 1 – January 31		3,363,257	$	54.64		3,363,257	$	423,642,140
February 1 – February 28		3,098,680	$	50.95		3,098,680	$	1,265,753,189
March 1 – March 31		2,048,843	$	52.88		2,048,843	$	1,157,409,106

In April 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a $500.0 million common share repurchase program and, on December 15, 2010, authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $500.0 million of common shares, extending the repurchase period to December 2012. On February 16, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $1.0 billion of the Company’s common shares, resulting in an aggregate of up to $2.0 billion of the Company’s common shares that may be repurchased through December 2012 under this program. Approved amounts exclude share repurchase transaction fees.

As of March 31, 2011 an aggregate 16,072,008 common shares were repurchased under the program at an average price of $52.43 per common share and total cost of $842.6 million.

During the period covered by this report, we did not sell any of our equity shares that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.


Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.


Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.


Item 5.		Other Information

None.


Item 6.		Exhibits


	31.1			Certification by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

	31.2			Certification by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

	32.1			Certification by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

	32.2			Certification by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

	101			The following materials from Celgene Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	CELGENE CORPORATION
DATE: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ Jacqualyn A. Fouse
		Jacqualyn A. Fouse
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

DATE: May 5, 2011	By:	/s/ Andre Van Hoek
		Andre Van Hoek
		Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer