e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-6402-1
Service Corporation
International
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
74-1488375
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
|
|
|
1929 Allen Parkway
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
77019
(Zip code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
713/522-5141
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock ($1 par value)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming that the
registrants only affiliates are its officers and
directors) was $3,455,228,251 based upon a closing market price
of $12.78 on June 30, 2007 of a share of common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions Tape.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common
stock as of February 22, 2008 was 261,814,225 (net of
treasury shares)
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement in connection
with its 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (Part III)
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
2
GLOSSARY
The following terms are common to the deathcare industry, are
used throughout this report, and have the following meanings:
Atneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements
after the death has occurred.
Burial Vaults A reinforced outer burial
container intended to protect the casket against the weight of
the earth.
Cremation The reduction of human remains to
bone fragments by intense heat.
General Agency (GA) Revenues Commissions paid
to the General Agency (GA) for life insurance policies or
annuities sold to preneed customers for the purpose of funding
preneed funeral arrangements. The commission rate paid is
determined based on the product type sold, the length of payment
terms, and the age of the insured/annuitant. The commission rate
is applied to the face amount of the policy purchased to
determine the commission amount payable to the GA. GA revenues
are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance purchase
transaction between the customer and third party insurance
provider is completed.
Interment The burial or final placement of
human remains in the ground.
Lawn Crypt An outer burial receptacle
constructed of concrete and reinforced steel, which is usually
pre-installed in predetermined designated areas.
Marker A method of identifying the remains in
a particular burial space, crypt, or niche. Permanent burial
markers are usually made of bronze, granite, or stone.
Maturity At the time of
death. This is the point at which preneed contracts
are converted to atneed contracts.
Mausoleum An above ground structure that is
designed to house caskets and cremation urns.
Perpetual Care or Endowment Care Fund A trust
fund used for the maintenance and upkeep of burial spaces within
a cemetery in perpetuity.
Preneed Purchase of products and services
prior to use.
Preneed Backlog Future revenues from
unfulfilled preneed funeral and cemetery contractual
arrangements.
Production Sales of preneed funeral and
preneed or atneed cemetery contracts.
As used herein, SCI, Company,
we, our, and us refer to
Service Corporation International and companies owned directly
or indirectly by Service Corporation International, unless the
context requires otherwise.
3
PART I
General
Service Corporation International (SCI) is North Americas
leading provider of deathcare products and services, with a
network of funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic
scale and reach. At December 31, 2007, we operated 1,329
funeral service locations and 366 cemeteries (including 207
combination locations) in North America, which are
geographically diversified across 43 states, eight Canadian
provinces, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our
funeral segment also includes the operations of 13 funeral homes
in Germany that we intend to exit when economic values and
conditions are conducive to a sale. As part of the Alderwoods
Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) transaction, we acquired Mayflower
National Life Insurance Company (Mayflower), an insurance
business that we sold in July 2007. The operations of this
business through the date of sale are presented as discontinued
operations in our consolidated statement of operations.
History
We were incorporated in Texas in July of 1962. Prior to 1999, we
focused on the acquisition and consolidation of independent
funeral homes and cemeteries in the fragmented deathcare
industry in North America. During the 1990s, we also expanded
our operations through acquisitions in Europe, Australia, South
America, and the Pacific Rim. During the mid to late 1990s,
acquisitions of deathcare facilities became extremely
competitive resulting in increased prices for acquisitions and
substantially reduced returns on invested capital. In 1999, we
significantly reduced our level of acquisition activity and
began to focus on identifying and addressing non-strategic or
underperforming businesses.
This focus resulted in the divestiture of several North America
and international operations beginning in 2001. During 2001 and
2002, we completed joint ventures of operations in Australia,
the United Kingdom, Spain, and Portugal. In 2003, we sold our
equity investment in our operations in Australia, Spain, and
Portugal. During 2004, we sold our funeral operations in France
and obtained an unconsolidated investment in the acquiring
entity. We also sold our equity investment in the United
Kingdom. During 2005, we divested of all of our operations in
Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile. During 2006, we sold our funeral
service location in Singapore, leaving our operations in Germany
as our sole remaining funeral service locations outside of North
America. During 2007, we sold our equity investment in France.
We also divested 70% of the operations of Kenyon International
Emergency Services (Kenyon). We may pursue discussions with
various third parties concerning the sale or joint venture of
our operations in Germany when economic values and conditions
are conducive to a sale.
In 2006, as part of our strategy to enhance our position as
North Americas premier funeral and cemetery provider, we
acquired Alderwoods for $20.00 per share in cash. The purchase
price of $1.2 billion included the refinancing of
$357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million of
Alderwoods debt. Alderwoods operations were substantially
integrated into our operations as of December 31, 2007.
These operations are operated in the same manner as our
incumbent operations and are reported in the appropriate
reporting segment (funeral or cemetery) in our consolidated
financial statements.
Funeral
and Cemetery Operations
Worldwide, we have 1,342 funeral service locations and 366
cemeteries (including 207 combination locations) covering
43 states, eight Canadian provinces, the District of
Columbia, Puerto Rico, and Germany. See Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ,
Note 17 of this
Form 10-K
for financial information about our business segments and
geographic areas.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses. We
provide all professional services relating to funerals and
cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor
vehicles, and preparation and embalming services. Funeral
related merchandise, including caskets, burial vaults, cremation
receptacles, flowers, and other ancillary products and services,
is sold at funeral service locations. Our cemeteries provide
cemetery property
4
interment rights, including mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn
crypts, and sell cemetery related merchandise and services,
including stone and bronze memorials, burial vaults, casket and
cremation memorialization products, merchandise installations,
and burial openings and closings. We also sell preneed funeral
and cemetery preneed products and services whereby a customer
contractually agrees to the terms of certain products and
services to be delivered and performed in the future.
Funeral service/cemetery combination locations are those
businesses in which a funeral service location is physically
located within or adjoining a cemetery that we own. Combination
locations allow certain facility, personnel, and equipment costs
to be shared between the funeral service location and cemetery.
Such combination facilities typically can be cost competitive
and have higher gross margins than if the funeral and cemetery
operations were operated separately. Combination locations also
create synergies between funeral and cemetery sales force
personnel and give families added convenience to purchase both
funeral and cemetery products and services at a single location.
With the acquisition of Alderwoods, we acquired Rose Hills,
which is the largest combination operation in the United States,
performing approximately 5,000 funeral services and 8,000
interments per year.
Our operations in the United States and Canada are organized
into 37 major markets and 45 middle markets (including eight
Hispana markets). Each market is led by a market director with
responsibility for funeral
and/or
cemetery operations and preneed sales. Within each market, the
funeral homes and cemeteries share common resources such as
personnel, preparation services, and vehicles. There are four
market support centers in North America to assist market
directors with financial, administrative, pricing, and human
resource needs. These support centers are located in Houston,
Miami, New York, and Los Angeles. The primary functions of the
support centers are to help facilitate the execution of
corporate strategies, coordinate communication between the field
and corporate offices, and serve as liaisons for the
implementation of policies and procedures.
See Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 17 of this
Form 10-K
for financial information related to our reportable segments and
geographic areas.
The following table (which includes businesses
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2007) provides the number of our
funeral homes and cemeteries by country, and by state,
territory, or province:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Country, State/Territory/Province
|
|
Funeral Homes
|
|
|
Cemeteries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
California
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Iowa
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Maine
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Country, State/Territory/Province
|
|
Funeral Homes
|
|
|
Cemeteries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Montana
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Nebraska
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
New York
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alberta
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
British Columbia
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Manitoba
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
New Brunswick
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Nova Scotia
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Ontario
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Quebec
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Saskatchewan
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes businesses held for sale at December 31, 2007. |
We believe we have satisfactory title to the properties owned
and used in our business, subject to various liens,
encumbrances, and easements, which are incidental to ownership
rights and uses and do not materially detract from
6
the value of the property. We also lease a number of facilities
that we use in our business under both capital and operating
leases.
At December 31, 2007, we owned approximately 90% of the
real estate and buildings used at our facilities, and the
remainder of the facilities were leased. At December 31,
2007, our 366 cemeteries contained a total of approximately
28,362 acres, of which approximately 62% was developed.
A map of our locations in North America is presented below:
Competition
Although there are several public companies that own funeral
homes and cemeteries, the majority of deathcare businesses are
locally-owned, independent operations. We estimate that our
funeral and cemetery market share in North America is
approximately 13% based on estimated total industry revenues.
The position of a single funeral home or cemetery in any
community is a function of the name, reputation, and location of
that funeral home or cemetery, although competitive pricing,
professional service and attention, and well-maintained
locations are also important.
We believe we have an unparalleled network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries that offer high quality products and
services at prices that are competitive with local competing
funeral homes, cemeteries, and retail locations. Within this
network, the funeral service locations and cemeteries operate
under various names as most operations were acquired as existing
businesses. We have branded our funeral operations in North
America under the name Dignity
Memorial®.
We believe our national branding strategy gives us a strategic
advantage and identity in the industry. While this branding
process is intended to emphasize our seamless national network
of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the original names
associated with acquired operations, and their inherent goodwill
and heritage, generally remain the same. For example, Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now Geo. H.
Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity
Memorial®
provider.
Employees
At December 31, 2007, we employed 13,499 (13,456 in North
America) individuals on a full time basis and 7,092 (7,088 in
North America) individuals on a part time basis. Of the full
time employees, 12,845 were employed in the funeral and cemetery
operations and 654 were employed in corporate or other overhead
activities and
7
services. All eligible employees in the United States who so
elect are covered by our group health and life insurance plans.
Eligible employees in the United States are participants in
retirement plans of SCI or various subsidiaries, while
international employees are covered by other SCI (or SCI
subsidiary) defined or government mandated benefit plans.
Approximately 3.9% of our employees in North America are
represented by unions. Although labor disputes are experienced
from time to time, relations with employees are generally
considered favorable.
Regulation
Our operations are subject to regulations, supervision, and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local
laws, ordinances, and regulations, including extensive
regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and
cemetery products and services, and various other aspects of our
business. We strive to comply in all material respects with the
provisions of these laws, ordinances, and regulations. Since
1984, we have operated in the United States under the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) comprehensive trade regulation rule for
the funeral industry. The rule contains requirements for funeral
industry practices, including extensive price and other
affirmative disclosures and imposes mandatory itemization of
funeral goods and services.
Other
Our corporate headquarters are located at 1929 Allen Parkway,
Houston, Texas 77019. The property consists of approximately
120,000 square feet of office space and 185,000 square
feet of parking space. We own and utilize two buildings located
in Houston, Texas for corporate activities containing a total of
approximately 172,000 square feet of office space.
We make available free of charge, on or through our website, our
annual, quarterly, and current reports and any amendments to
those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after
electronically filing such reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Our website is
http://www.sci-corp.com
and our telephone number is
(713) 522-5141.
The SEC also maintains an internet site at
http://www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC
at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information
on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
Each of our Board of Directors standing committee
charters, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of
Ethics for Board Members, and our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees are available, free of charge, through our website
or, upon request, in print. We will post on our internet website
all waivers to or amendments of our Code of Conduct for Officers
and Employees, which are required to be disclosed by applicable
law and rules of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.
Information contained on our website is not part of this report.
Cautionary
Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this
Form 10-K
that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements may be accompanied by words such as
believe, estimate, project,
expect, anticipate, or
predict that convey the uncertainty of future events
or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we
believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could
cause our actual consolidated results in the future to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and
in any other documents or oral presentations made by, or on
behalf of, the Company. These factors are discussed below. We
assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements made herein or any other
forward-looking statements made by the Company, whether as a
result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
8
Our
ability to execute our business plan depends on many factors,
many of which are beyond our control.
Our strategic plan is focused on cost management and the
continued implementation of key revenue initiatives, including
strategic pricing, designed to generate future internal growth
in our core funeral and cemetery operations. Many of the factors
necessary for the execution of our strategic plan, such as the
number of deaths and general economic conditions, are beyond our
control. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to
execute any or all of our strategic plan. Failure to execute any
or all of the strategic plan could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.
Our
credit agreements and debt securities contain covenants that may
prevent us from engaging in certain transactions.
Our credit agreements and debt securities contain, among other
things, various affirmative and negative covenants that may
prevent us from engaging in certain transactions that might
otherwise be considered beneficial to us. These covenants limit,
among other things, our and our subsidiaries ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
Incur additional secured indebtedness (including guarantee
obligations);
|
|
|
|
Create liens on assets;
|
|
|
|
Engage in certain transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
|
Enter into sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
|
Engage in mergers, liquidations, and dissolutions;
|
|
|
|
Sell assets;
|
|
|
|
Enter into leases;
|
|
|
|
Pay dividends, distributions, and other payments in respect of
capital stock and purchase our capital stock in the open market;
|
|
|
|
Make investments, loans, or advances;
|
|
|
|
Repay subordinated indebtedness or amend the agreements relating
thereto;
|
|
|
|
Change our fiscal year;
|
|
|
|
Create restrictions on our ability to receive distributions from
subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
Change our lines of business.
|
Our bank credit facility also requires us to maintain certain
leverage and interest coverage ratios. See Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,
Note 11 of this
Form 10-K
for further information related to our bank credit facility.
If we
lost the ability to use surety bonding to support our preneed
funeral and preneed cemetery activities, we may be required to
make material cash payments to fund certain trust
funds.
We have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies
whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf
as financial assurance or as required by existing state and
local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various
business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds
issued and outstanding have been issued to support our preneed
funeral and cemetery activities. In the event all of the surety
companies cancelled or did not renew our surety bonds, which are
generally renewed for twelve-month periods, we would be required
to either obtain replacement coverage or fund approximately
$235.9 million as of December 31, 2007 into
state-mandated trust accounts.
9
The
funeral home and cemetery industry continues to be increasingly
competitive.
In North America, the funeral and cemetery industry is
characterized by a large number of locally owned, independent
operations. To compete successfully, our funeral service
locations and cemeteries must maintain good reputations and high
professional standards, as well as offer attractive products and
services at competitive prices. In addition, we must market the
Company in such a manner as to distinguish us from our
competitors. We have historically experienced price competition
from independent funeral home and cemetery operators, monument
dealers, casket retailers, low-cost funeral providers, and other
non-traditional providers of services and merchandise. If we are
unable to successfully compete, our financial condition, results
of operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely
affected.
Our
affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in
equity securities, fixed income securities, and mutual funds,
which are affected by financial market conditions that are
beyond our control.
In connection with our preneed funeral and preneed cemetery
merchandise and service sales, most affiliated funeral and
cemetery trust funds own investments in equity securities and
mutual funds. Our earnings and investment gains and losses on
these equity securities and mutual funds are affected by
financial market conditions that are beyond our control. In
addition, our investments in our funeral, cemetery, and
perpetual care trusts have an indirect exposure, through our
investment fund managers, to mortgage-backed securities and
therefore to sub-prime mortgage markets. At December 31,
2007, our exposure to sub-prime mortgage investments is
approximately $18 million, or less than 1.0% of our total
investment portfolio of over $3 billion.
As of December 31, 2007, net unrealized appreciation in the
preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services trust
funds amounted to $5.9 million and $29.4 million,
respectively. Our perpetual care trust funds had net unrealized
depreciation of $2.9 million as of December 31, 2007.
The following table summarizes our investment returns, excluding
fees, on our trust funds for the last three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Preneed funeral trust funds
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
Cemetery merchandise and services trust funds
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
Perpetual care trust funds
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
If earnings from our trust funds decline, we would likely
experience a decline in future revenues. In addition, if the
trust funds experienced significant investment losses, there
could be insufficient funds in the trusts to cover the costs of
delivering services and merchandise or maintaining cemeteries in
the future. We would have to cover any such shortfall with cash
flows from operations, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flows.
Increasing
death benefits related to preneed funeral contracts funded
through life insurance or annuity contracts may not cover future
increases in the cost of providing a price-guaranteed funeral
service.
We sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through
various programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. For preneed funeral
contracts funded through life insurance or annuity contracts, we
receive in cash a general agency commission that typically
averages approximately 14% of the total sale from the third
party insurance company. Additionally, there is an increasing
death benefit associated with the contract of approximately 1%
per year to be received in cash at the time the funeral is
performed. There is no guarantee that the increasing death
benefit will cover future increases in the cost of providing a
price-guaranteed funeral service, which could materially
adversely affect our future cash flows, revenues, and operating
margins.
Unfavorable
results of litigation could have a material adverse impact on
our financial statements.
As discussed in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, Note 13 of this
Form 10-K,
we are subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits in the
ordinary course of our business. Adverse outcomes in some or all
of the pending cases may result in significant monetary damages
or injunctive relief against us. While management currently
believes that resolving all of these matters, individually or in
the aggregate, will not have
10
a material adverse impact on our financial position, cash flows,
or results of operations, litigation and other claims are
subject to inherent uncertainties and managements view of
these matters may change in the future. There exists the
possibility of a material adverse impact on our financial
position, cash flows, and the results of operations for the
period in which the effect of an unfavorable final outcome
becomes probable and reasonably estimable.
If the
number of deaths in our markets declines, our cash flows and
revenues may decrease.
If the number of deaths declines, the number of funeral services
and interments performed by us could decrease and our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
The
continuing upward trend in the number of cremations performed in
North America could result in lower revenue and gross profit
dollars.
There is a continuing upward trend in the number of cremations
performed in North America as an alternative to traditional
funeral service dispositions. However, we have seen a recent
stabilization in the trend for our businesses as our strategic
pricing initiative and discounting policies have resulted in a
decline in highly-discounted, low-service cremation customers.
In our operations in North America during 2007, 41.6% of the
comparable funeral services we performed were cremation cases
compared to 41.5% and 41.4% performed in 2006 and 2005,
respectively. We expect this continuing upward trend to resume
in the near future. We continue to expand our cremation
memorialization products and services, which have resulted in
higher average sales for cremation services. If we are unable to
successfully expand our cremation memorialization products and
services, and cremations continue to be a significant percentage
of our funeral services, our financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows could be materially adversely
affected.
The
funeral home and cemetery businesses are high fixed-cost
businesses.
The majority of our operations are managed in groups called
markets. Markets are geographical groups of funeral
service locations and cemeteries that share common resources
such as operating personnel, preparation services, clerical
staff, motor vehicles, and preneed sales personnel. Personnel
costs, the largest of our operating expenses, are the cost
components most beneficially affected by this grouping. We must
incur many of these costs regardless of the number of funeral
services or interments performed. Because we cannot necessarily
decrease these costs when we experience lower sales volumes, a
sales decline may cause margin percentages to decline at a
greater rate than the decline in revenues.
Regulation
and compliance could have a material adverse impact on our
financial results.
Our operations are subject to regulation, supervision, and
licensing under numerous foreign, federal, state, and local
laws, ordinances, and regulations, including extensive
regulations concerning trust funds, preneed sales of funeral and
cemetery products and services, and various other aspects of our
business. The impact of such regulations varies depending on the
location of our funeral and cemetery operations. Violations of
applicable laws could result in fines or sanctions to us.
In addition, from time to time, governments and agencies propose
to amend or add regulations, which would increase costs and
decrease cash flows. For example, foreign, federal, state,
local, and other regulatory agencies have considered and may
enact additional legislation or regulations that could affect
the deathcare industry, such as regulations that require more
liberal refund and cancellation policies for preneed sales of
products and services, limit or eliminate our ability to use
surety bonding, increase trust requirements,
and/or
prohibit the common ownership of funeral homes and cemeteries in
the same market. If adopted by the regulatory authorities of the
jurisdictions in which we operate, these and other possible
proposals could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards, and
customs concerning burial procedures and the handling and care
of human remains is critical to the continued success of our
business and any operations we may acquire. Litigation and
regulatory proceedings regarding these issues could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows. We are continually monitoring and
reviewing our
11
operations in an effort to insure that we are in compliance with
these laws, regulations, and standards and, where appropriate,
taking appropriate corrective action.
A
number of years may elapse before particular tax matters, for
which we have established accruals, are audited and finally
resolved.
The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on
the tax jurisdiction. In the United States, the Internal Revenue
Service is currently examining our tax returns for 1999 through
2005 and various state jurisdictions are auditing years through
2006. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome
or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, we
believe that our accruals reflect the probable outcome of known
tax contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular
issue would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the use of
cash. Favorable resolution could result in reduced income tax
expense reported in the financial statements in the future.
Failure
to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting
could adversely affect our financial results, our operations and
our stock price, and cause investors to lose confidence in the
reliability of our financial statements.
Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary
for us to provide reliable financial reports. When we identify
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting, such as those disclosed in Item 9A, we are unable to
conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is
effective. In such event, our financial results, operations and
stock price could be adversely affected, and investors could
lose confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
Information regarding properties is set forth in Part I,
Item 1. Business of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 13 of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
None.
12
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth as of February 29, 2008 the
name and age of each executive officer of the Company, the
office held, and the year first elected an officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year First
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Became
|
Officer Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Officer
|
|
R. L. Waltrip
|
|
77
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
1962
|
|
Thomas L. Ryan
|
|
42
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
1999
|
|
Michael R. Webb
|
|
49
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
1998
|
|
J. Daniel Garrison
|
|
56
|
|
Senior Vice President Operations Support
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Philip C. Jacobs
|
|
53
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Stephen M. Mack
|
|
56
|
|
Senior Vice President Middle Market Operations
|
|
|
1998
|
|
Gregory T. Sangalis
|
|
52
|
|
Senior Vice President General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Eric D. Tanzberger
|
|
39
|
|
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
2000
|
|
Sumner J. Waring, III
|
|
39
|
|
Senior Vice President Major Market Operations
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Jeffrey I. Beason
|
|
59
|
|
Vice President Corporate Controller
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Christopher H. Cruger
|
|
33
|
|
Vice President Business Development
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Joseph A. Hayes
|
|
51
|
|
Vice President Ethics and Business Conduct and Assistant General
Counsel
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Jane D. Jones
|
|
52
|
|
Vice President Human Resources
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Albert R. Lohse
|
|
47
|
|
Vice President Litigation and Risk Management
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Elisabeth G. Nash
|
|
46
|
|
Vice President Process and Technology
|
|
|
2004
|
|
Donald R. Robinson
|
|
50
|
|
Vice President Supply Chain Management
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Mr. Waltrip is the founder, Chairman of the Company, and a
licensed funeral director. He grew up in his familys
funeral business and assumed management of the firm in the 1950s
after earning a Bachelors degree in Business
Administration from the University of Houston. He began buying
additional funeral homes in the 1960s, achieving cost
efficiencies by pooling their resources. At the end of 2007, the
network he began had grown to include more than 1,700 funeral
service locations and cemeteries. Mr. Waltrip took the
Company public in 1969. He has provided leadership to the
Company for over 40 years. In 2005, Mr. Waltrip
resigned as Chief Executive Officer, but he continues to serve
as Chairman of the Board.
Mr. Ryan joined the Company in June 1996 and served in a
variety of financial management roles within the Company. In
February 1999, Mr. Ryan was promoted to Vice President
International Finance. In November 2000, he was promoted to
Chief Executive Officer of European Operations based in Paris,
France. In July 2002, Mr. Ryan was appointed President and
Chief Operating Officer. In February 2005, he was promoted to
Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Ryan was a Certified Public Accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years.
Mr. Ryan is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University
of Texas-Austin.
Mr. Webb joined the Company in 1991 when it acquired
Arlington Corporation, a regional funeral and cemetery
consolidator, where he was then Chief Financial Officer. Prior
to joining Arlington Corporation, Mr. Webb held various
executive financial and development roles at Days Inns of
America and Telemundo Group, Inc. In 1993, Mr. Webb joined
our corporate development group, which he later led on a global
basis before accepting operational responsibility for our
Australian and Hispanic businesses. Mr. Webb was promoted
to Vice President
13
International Corporate Development in February 1998 and was
named Executive Vice President in July 2002. In February 2005,
he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. He is a graduate of
the University of Georgia, where he earned a Bachelor of
Business Administration degree.
Mr. Garrison joined the Company in 1978 and worked in a
series of management positions until he was promoted to
President of the Southeastern Region in 1992. In 1998,
Mr. Garrison was promoted to Vice President International
Operations. In 2000, Mr. Garrison became Vice President
North American Cemetery Operations and was promoted to Vice
President Operations Services in August 2002. He assumed his
current position as Senior Vice President Operations Support in
February 2005. Mr. Garrison has a Bachelor of Science
degree in Administrative Management from Clemson University.
Mr. Jacobs joined SCI in 2007 as Senior Vice President and
Chief Marketing Officer. Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Jacobs was employed by CompUSA as Chief Marketing
Officer. Prior to that he was employed by Publicis Worldwide as
Chief Marketing Officer and prior to that held other management
roles over the past 23 years at several of the
nations top advertising agencies, as well as client-side
positions. Mr. Jacobs holds a Bachelor of Science degree
from the University of Tennessee and a Masters degree from
Vanderbilt University.
Mr. Mack joined the Company in 1973 as a resident director
after graduating from Farmingdale State University of New York.
He became Vice President of the Eastern Region in 1987 and in
February 1998 Mr. Mack was appointed Vice President North
American Funeral Operations. Mr. Mack was promoted to
Senior Vice President Eastern Operations in August 2002 and
assumed the office of Senior Vice President Middle Market
Operations, his current position, in May 2004.
Mr. Sangalis joined the Company in 2007 as Senior Vice
President General Counsel and Secretary. He previously served as
Senior Vice President, Law and Administration for Team Inc., a
leading provider of specialty industrial maintenance and
construction services. Prior to that, Mr. Sangalis served
as Managing Director and General Counsel of Main Street Equity
Ventures II, a private equity investment firm, and as Senior
Vice President General Counsel and Secretary for Waste
Management Inc., the leading provider of waste management
services in North America. Mr. Sangalis holds a
bachelors degree in finance from Indiana University and an
M.B.A. from the University of Minnesota. He earned his juris
doctorate from the University of Minnesota Law School.
Mr. Tanzberger joined the Company in August 1996 as Manager
of Budgets & Financial Analysis. He was promoted to
Vice President Investor Relations and Assistant Corporate
Controller in January 2000 and to Corporate Controller in August
2002. In 2006, Mr. Tanzberger was promoted to the position
of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. In 2007,
Mr. Tanzberger was appointed Treasurer. Prior to joining
the Company, Mr. Tanzberger was Assistant Corporate
Controller at Kirby Marine Transportation Corporation, an inland
waterway barge and tanker company, from January through August
1996. Prior thereto, he was a Certified Public Accountant with
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. for more than five years.
Mr. Tanzberger is a graduate of the University of Notre
Dame, where he earned a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree.
Mr. Waring, a licensed funeral director, joined the Company
as an Area Vice President in 1996 when we merged with his
familys funeral business. Mr. Waring was appointed
Regional President of the Northeast Region in 1999 and was
promoted to Regional President of the Pacific Region in
September 2001. Mr. Waring was promoted to Vice President
Western Operations in August 2002 and assumed the office of Vice
President Major Market Operations in November 2003. In February
2006, Mr. Waring was promoted to Senior Vice President
Major Market Operations. Mr. Waring holds a Bachelor of
Science degree in Business Administration from Stetson
University in Deland, Florida, a degree in Mortuary Science from
Mt. Ida College and a Masters of Business Administration degree
from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.
Mr. Beason joined SCI in July 2006 as Vice President and
Corporate Controller. Prior to joining SCI, he was an employee
of El Paso Corporation, a natural gas transmission and
production company. Mr. Beason joined El Paso in 1978
and held various accounting and reporting roles until 1993. From
1993 to 1996, he held the position of Sr. Vice President
Administration of Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, a wholly
owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation. From 1996 to
November 2005, Mr. Beason was Senior Vice President
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of El Paso
Corporation. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a
Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting degree from
Texas Tech University.
14
Mr. Cruger oversees Corporate Development, real estate, and
the Dignity
Memorial®
affiliate network of independent funeral homes. He initially
served the Company as a financial analyst in the corporate
development department from 1996 until 1999, when he left to
become Manager of Financial Analysis for R. H. Donnelley
Corporation. During 2000, he returned to SCI to focus on
international divestitures. From 2003 to February 2005, he
served as Managing Director of Corporate Development. In
February 2005, he was promoted to Vice President of Business
Development. Mr. Cruger graduated from Lehigh University
with a Bachelor of Science in Finance.
Mr. Hayes was appointed Vice President Ethics and Business
Conduct and Assistant General Counsel in November 2007.
Mr. Hayes joined the Company in 1991 as corporate counsel.
He was named Managing Counsel in 1996 and Assistant General
Counsel in 2005. Prior to joining SCI, Mr. Hayes practiced
law in Chicago and San Diego, specializing in securities,
mergers and acquisitions, and commercial transactions. He
received a bachelors degree in commerce from DePaul University
and earned his juris doctorate from the University of California
at Berkeley.
Mrs. Jones joined SCI in 2003 from Dynegy, Inc., where she
served as Vice President of Total Rewards. She oversees human
resources, training and education, and payroll and commission
services activities that assist approximately
20,000 employees in North America. Mrs. Jones was
promoted to Vice President Human Resources in February 2005. She
holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting
with a minor in Finance from Southern Methodist University. She
is a Certified Compensation Professional.
Mr. Lohse joined SCI in 2000 as Managing Director of
Litigation and has since been involved in the resolution of
major litigation issues for the Company. In 2004, Mr. Lohse
was promoted to Vice President Corporate Governance. Before
joining the Company, Mr. Lohse was Managing Partner at
McDade, Fogler, Maines & Lohse where he conducted a general
civil trial practice. Prior to that, he practiced tort and
commercial litigation at Fulbright & Jaworski.
Mr. Lohse received a Bachelor of Business Administration
degree from the University of Texas and a Juris Doctor from the
University of Houston Law Center.
Ms. Nash joined SCI in 2002 as Managing Director of
Strategic Planning and Process Improvement. Prior to joining
SCI, Ms. Nash worked for the Pennzoil Corporation and held
various senior management accounting and financial positions. In
2004, Ms. Nash was promoted to Vice President Continuous
Process Improvement. Her primary responsibilities include
improving operating systems, reducing overhead costs, and
identifying and assisting in the implementation of initiatives
to improve operating profit margins and cash flow. She is a
graduate of Texas A&M University where she received a
Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting.
Mr. Robinson joined SCI in 1996 as Director of Procurement.
Prior to joining the Company Mr. Robinson was employed by
Marathon Oil Company, where he spent 16 years in a variety
of procurement, logistics, and information technology positions.
In February 2005, he was promoted to Vice President Supply Chain
Management. Prior to this promotion, he was Managing Director of
Business Support Services, a position in which he oversaw fleet
management and office services; voice, travel, and shipping
services; and supply chain and purchasing activities.
Mr. Robinson holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business
Administration with a minor in Computer Service from Taylor
University in Upland, Indiana.
Each officer of the Company is elected by the Board of Directors
and holds their office until a successor is elected and
qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or removal in the
manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Company. Each officer of
a subsidiary of the Company is elected by the subsidiarys
board of directors and holds their office until a successor is
elected and qualified or until earlier death, resignation, or
removal in the manner prescribed in the Bylaws of the Subsidiary.
15
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
since May 14, 1974. On December 31, 2007, there were
5,018 holders of record of our common stock. In calculating the
number of shareholders, we consider clearing agencies and
security position listings as one shareholder for each agency or
listing. At December 31, 2007, we had
262,858,169 shares outstanding, net of 1,961,300 treasury
shares.
During 2007, we paid cash dividends totaling $34.6 million
and accrued $10.6 million for dividends paid on
January 31, 2008. While we intend to pay regular quarterly
cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent
dividends are subject to final determination by our Board of
Directors each quarter after its review of our financial
performance.
The table below shows our quarterly high and low closing common
stock prices for the two years ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
12.20
|
|
|
$
|
10.31
|
|
|
$
|
8.46
|
|
|
$
|
7.75
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
13.98
|
|
|
$
|
11.66
|
|
|
$
|
8.50
|
|
|
$
|
7.73
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
|
$
|
11.04
|
|
|
$
|
9.34
|
|
|
$
|
7.37
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
14.47
|
|
|
$
|
12.83
|
|
|
$
|
10.45
|
|
|
$
|
8.97
|
|
Options in our common stock are traded on the Philadelphia Stock
Exchange. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SCI.
Stock Performance Graph. This graph assumes
the total return on $100 invested on December 31, 2002, in
SCI Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index, and a peer group
selected by the Company (the Peer Group). The Peer
Group is comprised of Alderwoods Group, Inc., Carriage Services,
Inc., Hillenbrand Industries, Inc., Matthews International
Corp., Rock of Ages Corporation, and Stewart Enterprises,
Inc. Alderwoods Group is included in the Peer Group until
November 28, 2006, when it was acquired by SCI. Total
return data assumes reinvestment of dividends.
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER RETURNS
For equity compensation plan information, see Part III of
this
Form 10-K.
16
On October 31, 2007, we issued 361 deferred common stock
equivalents or units pursuant to provisions regarding the
receipt of dividends under the Amended and Restated Director Fee
Plan to four non-employee directors. These issuances were
unregistered as they did not constitute a sale
within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
Since 2004, we have repurchased a total of $868.4 million
of common stock at an average cost per share of $9.70. During
the three months ended December 31, 2007, we repurchased
21,614,539 shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost
of $293.4 million and an average cost per share of $13.57.
In November 2007, our Board of Directors approved an increase in
our share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to
an additional $250 million to repurchase our common stock.
The remaining dollar value of shares to be purchased under the
share repurchase program was $145.6 million at
December 31, 2007. As discussed in Item 1A, our credit
agreement and debt securities contain covenants that restrict
our ability to repurchase our common stock. Pursuant to the
program, we repurchased shares of our common stock during the
fourth quarter of 2007 as set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value of
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Shares That May
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet be Purchased
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Announced Programs
|
|
|
Under the Program
|
|
|
October 1, 2007 October 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,518,100
|
|
|
$
|
13.21
|
|
|
|
3,518,100
|
|
|
$
|
142,477,192
|
|
November 1, 2007 November 30, 2007
|
|
|
13,590,245
|
|
|
$
|
13.68
|
|
|
|
13,590,245
|
|
|
$
|
206,609,329
|
|
December 1, 2007 December 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,506,194
|
|
|
$
|
13.54
|
|
|
|
4,506,194
|
|
|
$
|
145,598,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,614,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,614,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to December 31, 2007, we repurchased an
additional 1,645,600 shares of common stock at an aggregate
cost of $22.5 million including commissions (average cost
per share of $13.68). After these purchases, the remaining
dollar value of shares authorized to be purchased under our
share repurchase program was approximately $123.1 million.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
The table below contains selected consolidated financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2003 through
December 31, 2007. The statement of operations data
includes reclassifications of certain items to conform to
current period presentations with no impact on net income or
financial position.
The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the
consolidated financial statements included in this
Form 10-K.
This historical information is not necessarily indicative of
future results.
17
Selected
Consolidated Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007(5)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,285.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,752.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,717.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,832.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,314.5
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
$
|
243.3
|
|
|
$
|
52.6
|
|
|
$
|
55.1
|
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
|
$
|
69.1
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(1)
|
|
$
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
43.8
|
|
|
$
|
16.0
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(187.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
247.7
|
|
|
$
|
56.5
|
|
|
$
|
(127.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
110.7
|
|
|
$
|
85.1
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.37
|
|
|
$
|
.23
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.36
|
|
|
$
|
.23
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.35
|
|
|
$
|
.28
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
$
|
.34
|
|
|
$
|
.28
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.105
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at December 31):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
8,932.2
|
|
|
$
|
9,729.4
|
|
|
$
|
7,544.8
|
|
|
$
|
8,227.2
|
|
|
$
|
7,571.2
|
|
Long-term debt (less current maturities), including capital
leases
|
|
$
|
1,820.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,912.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,186.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,200.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,530.1
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,492.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,594.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,581.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,843.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,516.3
|
|
Selected Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
356.2
|
|
|
$
|
324.2
|
|
|
$
|
312.9
|
|
|
$
|
94.2
|
|
|
$
|
374.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our operations in Singapore, which were sold in 2006 and in
Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile, which were sold in 2005 have been
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The operations of Mayflower, which were sold in 2007, have been
classified as discontinued operations in 2007 and 2006 (since
acquisition). For more information regarding discontinued
operations, see Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, Note 20, of this
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Results for 2007, 2006, and 2005 reflect our change in
accounting for direct selling costs related to preneed funeral
and cemetery contracts. Results for 2005 include a
$187.5 million charge, net of tax, for the cumulative
effect of this change. For more information regarding this
accounting change, see Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 3, of this
Form 10-K. |
|
(3) |
|
On March 18, 2004, we implemented revised Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46
(FIN 46R). Under the provisions of FIN 46R, we are
required to consolidate our preneed funeral and cemetery
merchandise and service trust assets, cemetery perpetual care
trusts, and certain cemeteries. As a result of this accounting
change, we recognized a cumulative effect charge of
$14.0 million, net of tax, in 2004. |
|
(4) |
|
Results for 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004 reflect our change in
accounting for pension gains and losses. Results for 2004
include a $36.6 million charge, net of tax, for the
cumulative effect of this change. |
|
(5) |
|
Results for 2007 include a $158.1 million pretax gain on
redemption of securities. |
18
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The
Company
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare
products and services, with a network of funeral homes and
cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. During
2007, we accomplished our key goal by substantially completing
the integration of Alderwoods into our operations. By combining
the two leading companies in the deathcare industry, we have
realized several cost-saving synergies through the elimination
of duplicate information technology systems and infrastructure;
duplicate accounting, finance, legal, and other systems;
overlapping management; and duplicate executive and public
company costs. In connection with the acquisition of Alderwoods,
we identified annual pretax cost savings and revenue enhancement
opportunities totaling $90 million to $100 million
related to our integration of Alderwoods.
We continue to focus on returning capital to our shareholders.
Since August 2004, we have invested nearly $1 billion in
cumulative stock repurchases and quarterly dividends. We
currently have over $123.1 million authorized to repurchase
our common stock. Our financial stability is further enhanced by
our $6.7 billion backlog of future revenues at
December 31, 2007, which is the result of preneed funeral
and cemetery sales. We believe we have the financial strength
and flexibility to reward shareholders through dividends while
maintaining a prudent capital structure and pursuing new
opportunities for profitable growth.
Strategies
for Growth
We are confident about our competitive position, our financial
strength, and our ability to further our principal strategies to
generate profitable growth over the long-term are as follows:
Target
Our Customer
In 2007, we made good progress in better understanding our
atneed consumers and their preferences. We are replacing the
industrys traditional one-size-fits-all service approach
with a flexible operating and marketing strategy that is
tailored to our customers needs. By doing so, we can focus
our resources on the most profitable customer categories and
improve our effectiveness. We continue to refine our pricing,
product and market strategies to support this approach.
Consistent with this strategy, we made local business decisions
in the last few years to exit unprofitable business
relationships and activities, which resulted in a decrease in
the number of total funeral services performed. However, we also
experienced significant improvements in average revenue per
funeral service. We expect these improvements to continue into
the future as we redeploy resources to more profitable areas. We
continue to analyze our existing operations, including those
acquired in the Alderwoods acquisition, and may exit certain
business relationships or activities that do not fit our
customer segmentation strategy.
Going forward, our primary focus is shifting to the preneed
consumer. We intend to develop a more compelling marketing
message that is tailored to our customers and explore new
marketing channels that will take advantage of our size. We are
improving our selling approach and process to better attract and
educate prospective customers. We continue to review our product
and service offerings for opportunities to better serve our
customers. And, we are working to establish an appropriate and
effective means of ongoing communications with our preneed
consumers that will lead to referrals.
Drive
Operating Discipline and Leverage Our Scale
Although we have already made substantial improvements to our
infrastructure, we believe we can continue to achieve operating
improvements through better centralization and standardization
of processes for staffing, central care, fleet management and
cemetery maintenance. The acquisition of Alderwoods provides
further opportunities for synergies and operating efficiencies,
which will allow us to utilize our scale and increase
profitability. We have developed and will continue to refine
operating standards and track shared best practices to support
higher productivity. We also intend to continue to capitalize on
our nationwide network of properties by pursuing strategic
affinity partnerships. Over the longer term, we believe these
relationships can be important to potential customers in their
funeral home and cemetery selection process.
19
Manage
and Grow the Footprint
We are managing our network of business locations by positioning
each business location to support the preferences of its local
customer base while monitoring each market for changing
demographics and competitive dynamics. As we develop
comprehensive plans for each of our markets, we anticipate that
we will have opportunities to decrease the number of locations
without losing significant earnings. In addition, we expect to
pursue selective business expansion through construction or
targeted acquisitions of cemeteries and funeral homes with a
focus on the highest return customer categories. Over the long
term, our size and scale also allow us the opportunity to pursue
a franchise business model, which could drive incremental
revenue at very little cost.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital
Allocation Considerations
Since 1999, we have gained significant financial flexibility by
reducing debt and improving our cash flow. We rely on cash flow
from operations as a significant source of liquidity. Our cash
flow from operating activities provided $356.2 million in
2007. Our current cash and cash equivalents balance is
approximately $150 million as of February 25, 2008. In
addition, we have approximately $246 million in borrowing
capacity under our
5-year
revolving credit facility (which is currently supporting
$54.3 million of letters of credit). We have
$45.2 million in 6.5% notes due in March 2008;
however, we intend to refinance these notes on a long-term basis
through the utilization of our revolving credit agreement. We
believe these sources of liquidity can be supplemented by our
ability to access the capital markets for additional debt or
equity securities.
In order to finance the Alderwoods acquisition, we significantly
increased our indebtedness in the fourth quarter of 2006. In
addition to using $608 million of cash on hand, we issued
$500 million in senior notes, $200 million in
privately placed debt securities, and took out a
$150 million term loan for up to three years under our new
credit facility. We prepaid $50 million of our term loan
indebtedness in December 2006 and prepaid the remaining
$100 million in 2007. At December 31, 2007, our
current liabilities exceeded our current assets by
$5.1 million. We believe our future operating cash flows
and the available capacity under our credit facility described
above will be adequate to meet our working capital needs.
During 2007, we had the following issuances and repayments of
our debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Due Date
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
Issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
6.75%
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
2015
|
Notes
|
|
|
7.5%
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances through December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments normal retirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
6.875%
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
2007
|
Other
|
|
|
various
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
various
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments through December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments early extinguishment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
|
2008
|
Notes
|
|
|
7.7%
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
2009
|
Senior Notes Series A
|
|
|
Libor + 2.0%
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
2011
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
Libor + 2.0%
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments through December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will continue to focus on funding growth initiatives that
generate increased profitability, revenue, and cash flows. These
capital investments include the construction of high-end
cemetery property (such as private family estates) and the
construction of funeral home facilities. We will also consider
the acquisition of additional deathcare operations that fit our
long-term customer-focused strategy, if the expected returns
exceed our cost of capital.
20
We paid our shareholders cash dividends from 1974 to 1999. In
early 2005, we resumed paying shareholders a quarterly cash
dividend of $0.025 per common share. In November 2006, we
increased our quarterly dividend to $0.03 per common share. In
November 2007, we increased our dividend to $0.04 per common
share. While we intend to pay regular quarterly cash dividends
for the foreseeable future, all future dividends are subject to
final determination by our Board of Directors each quarter after
its review of our financial performance and to limitations in
debt covenants.
We currently have approximately $123.1 million authorized
under our share repurchase program. We intend to make purchases
from time to time in the open market or through privately
negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions, debt
covenants, and normal trading restrictions. Our credit agreement
and privately-placed debt securities contain covenants that
limit our ability to repurchase our common stock. There can be
no assurance that we will buy our common stock under our share
repurchase program in the future.
Cash
Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is
one of our fundamental financial strengths and provides us with
substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing
needs. Highlights of cash flow for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
Operating Activities Cash flows from
operating activities were $356.2 million in 2007 compared
to $324.2 million in 2006. The 2006 cash flows from
operating activities increased by $11.4 million as compared
to the operating cash flows in 2005. Included in 2007 are
one-time transition costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition
of $38.6 million, $11.7 million of premiums paid on
the early extinguishment of debt, pension termination costs of
$40.9 million, and a distribution from our equity
investment in our French operations of $17.0 million.
Included in 2006 are transition costs related to the Alderwoods
acquisition of $3.2 million and $15.7 million of
premiums paid on the early extinguishment of debt. Included in
2005 was a federal income tax refund of $29.0 million and
$12.2 million of premiums paid on the early extinguishment
of debt.
Excluding the above items, cash flows from operating activities
in 2007 increased approximately $87 million compared to
2006. This increase includes additional cash flow and synergies
achieved related to the Alderwoods acquisition as well as
$26.1 million in trust proceeds arising from our recent
reconciliations of the preneed funeral and cemetery backlogs of
Alderwoods. These increases were partially offset by
$42.4 million in additional interest payments resulting
from increased borrowings to finance the Alderwoods acquisition
and $29 million in additional cash tax payments.
In addition to the items discussed above, the increase in
operating cash flows in 2006 as compared to 2005 is the result
of $21.2 million of rent payments that were classified in
operating cash flows in 2005, but which are classified as
principal payments on capital leases as a component of cash
flows from financing activities in 2006 due to our revised lease
terms. The remaining increase is the result of
$10.9 million in proceeds from the redemption of
convertible preferred equity certificates received in connection
with our disposition of our operations in France, the receipt of
$7.9 million of endowment care proceeds as a result of the
resolution of disputes over ownership rights, and a net source
of approximately $10.0 million from working capital. This
working capital source resulted from an increase in preneed and
atneed cash receipts, and increases in cash interest income,
which were partially offset by an increase in bonus and
long-term incentive compensation payments in 2006 related to a
2003 compensation program.
We did not pay federal income taxes in 2006 or 2005. Because of
our net operating loss carryforwards, we did not pay federal
income taxes until the fourth quarter of 2007. The federal
income tax payment was $8.3 million in 2007. We expect to
pay federal income taxes in 2008. Foreign, state, and local
income tax payments increased $20.6 million to
$36.2 million in 2007 as compared to $15.6 million in
2006 and $6.6 million in 2005 primarily as a result of the
additional taxable income generated from our Alderwoods
operations acquired at the end of 2006.
Investing Activities Investing activities
provided net cash flows of $378.1 million in 2007 compared
to net cash used of $1.3 billion in 2006, due to
$1.3 billion in cash outflows for acquisitions in 2006
(primarily Alderwoods) and a $327.5 million increase in
proceeds from divestitures in 2007 compared to 2006. The 2006
net
21
cash outflows from investing activities of $1.3 billion
represents a $1.5 billion change from 2005 primarily due to
the 2006 acquisition of Alderwoods.
In 2007, we completed the sale of Mayflower National Life
Insurance Company, Alderwoods former insurance subsidiary, and
we divested all of our properties required to be divested by the
FTC as a result of the Alderwoods acquisition. We also received
$4.7 million of proceeds held as an income tax receivable
related to the 2005 sale of our operations in Chile,
$1.9 million in cash proceeds related to the 2006 sale of
our operations in Singapore, and $144.0 million related to
redemption of securities.
In 2006, we acquired Alderwoods for $1.2 billion, including
refinancing of $357.7 million of Alderwoods debt. We also
received $11.0 million of proceeds held as an income tax
receivable related to the 2005 sale of our operations in Chile
and $10.6 million in cash proceeds from the fourth quarter
2006 sale of our operations in Singapore.
In 2005, we received $90.4 million from the disposition of
our cemetery operations in Chile, $42.7 million related to
the collection of the EUR 10 million note receivable
and the redemption of preferred equity certificates related to
our equity investment in our former French operations (of which
$39.7 million is reported as an investing activity), and
$21.6 million from the disposition of our Argentina and
Uruguay businesses.
Financing Activities Cash flows from
financing activities used $607.5 million in 2007 compared
to generating $565.2 million in 2006. This
$1.2 billion net decrease in financing cash flows in 2007
compared to 2006 was driven by lower proceeds from the issuance
of long-term debt, higher share repurchases, and an increase in
debt extinguishments. Cash flows from financing activities
generated incremental cash of $891.6 million in 2006
compared to 2005 primarily due to higher proceeds from the
issuance of long-term debt, a reduction in share repurchases,
and a reduction in debt payments.
Proceeds from long-term debt (net of debt issuance costs) were
$392.6 million in 2007 due to the issuance of
$200.0 million of senior unsecured 6.75% notes due
2015 and $200.0 million of senior unsecured
7.50% notes due 2027. Proceeds from long-term debt (net of
debt issuance costs) were $825.3 million in 2006 due to the
issuance of $250.0 million of senior unsecured
7.625% notes due 2018, $250.0 million of senior
unsecured 7.375% notes due 2014, $200 million of
private placement offerings, and $150 million term loan.
Proceeds from long term debt (net of debt issuance costs) were
$291.5 million in 2005 due to the issuance of
$300 million of senior unsecured 7.00% notes due 2017.
Payments of debt in 2007 were $528.8 million due to early
extinguishments of $472.5 million, the acceptance of the
tender of $13.5 million of our 6.875% notes due
October 2007, $3.7 million in scheduled debt payments,
$27.1 million in payments on capital leases, and
$12.0 million of other note payments. Payments of debt in
2006 were $228.9 million due to early extinguishments of
$181.5 million, $26.1 million in scheduled debt
payments, and $21.3 million in payments on capital leases.
The $377.1 million of debt payments in 2005 include early
extinguishments of $291.3 million, the $63.5 million
final payment of our 6.00% notes due December 2005 and
$22.3 million of other note payments.
We repurchased 38.5 million shares of common stock for
$505.1 million in 2007, compared to 3.4 million shares
for $27.9 million in 2006 and 31.0 million shares for
$225.1 million in 2005.
We paid $34.6 million of cash dividends during 2007,
$29.4 million of cash dividends during 2006 and
$22.6 million of cash dividends during 2005 related to the
quarterly cash dividend reinstated in 2005 by the Board of
Directors.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commercial and
Contingent Commitments
We have assumed various financial obligations and commitments in
the ordinary course of conducting our business. We have
contractual obligations requiring future cash payments under
existing contractual arrangements, such as debt maturities,
interest on long-term debt, and employment, consulting, and
non-competition agreements. We also have commercial and
contingent obligations that result in cash payments only if
certain events occur requiring our performance pursuant to a
funding commitment.
22
The following table details our known future cash payments (on
an undiscounted basis) related to various contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009-2010
|
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Debt maturities(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
36.6
|
|
|
$
|
91.4
|
|
|
$
|
209.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,519.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,856.7
|
|
Interest obligation on long-term debt(3)
|
|
|
131.1
|
|
|
|
254.0
|
|
|
|
233.3
|
|
|
|
570.1
|
|
|
|
1,188.5
|
|
Operating lease agreements(4)
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
55.4
|
|
|
|
98.2
|
|
Employment, consulting, and non-competition agreements(5)
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
Pension termination(6)
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
190.8
|
|
|
$
|
369.4
|
|
|
$
|
457.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,146.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,164.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our outstanding indebtedness contains standard provisions, such
as payment delinquency default clauses and change of control
clauses. In addition, our bank credit agreement contains a
maximum leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio.
See Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 11 of this
Form 10-K
for additional details of our long-term debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in
2011-2012 is
$45.2 million of 6.5% notes due March 2008 which we
intend to refinance on a long-term basis through the utilization
of our revolving credit agreement due November 2011. |
|
(3) |
|
Approximately 89% of our total debt is fixed rate debt for which
the interest obligation was calculated at the stated rate.
Future interest obligations on our floating rate debt are based
on the current forward rate curve of the underlying index. |
|
(4) |
|
The majority of our lease arrangements contain options to
(i) purchase the property at fair value on the exercise
date, (ii) purchase the property for a value determined at
the inception of the leases, or (iii) renew for the fair
rental value at the end of the primary lease term. Our leases
primarily relate to funeral service locations and cemetery
operating and maintenance equipment. See Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,
Note 13 of this
Form 10-K
for additional details related to leases. |
|
(5) |
|
We have entered into management employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements which contractually require us to
make cash payments over the contractual period. The agreements
have been primarily entered into with certain officers and
employees and former owners of businesses acquired. Agreements
with contractual periods less than one year are excluded. See
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 13 of this
Form 10-K
for additional details related to these agreements. |
|
(6) |
|
We have committed to a plan to terminate the Employee Retirement
Plan of Rose Hills in 2008. See Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 16 of
this
Form 10-K
for additional details related to our pension plans. |
The following table details our known potential or possible
future cash payments (on an undiscounted basis) related to
various commercial and contingent obligations as of
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration by Period
|
|
Commercial and Contingent Obligations
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009-2010
|
|
|
2011-2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Surety obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
235.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
235.9
|
|
Long-term obligations related to uncertain tax positions(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177.8
|
|
Letters of credit(3)
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.3
|
|
Representations and warranties(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
Income distributions from trust(5)
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and contingent obligations
|
|
$
|
334.4
|
|
|
$
|
211.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
545.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the aggregate refund obligation associated with our
surety bond arrangements. See the section titled Financial
Assurances following this table in this
Form 10-K
for more information related to surety bonds. |
|
(2) |
|
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007
(see Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 10 for additional information). In
accordance with the provisions of FIN 48, we have recorded
$177.8 million of unrecognized tax benefits and related
interest and penalties. Due to the uncertainty regarding the
timing and completion of audits and possible outcomes, it is not
possible to estimate the ranges of increase and decrease and the
timing thereof; however, we believe the existing liabilities
will expire by 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
We are occasionally required to post letters of credit, issued
by a financial institution, to secure certain insurance programs
or other obligations. Letters of credit generally authorize the
financial institution to make a payment to the beneficiary upon
the satisfaction of a certain event or the failure to satisfy an
obligation. The letters of credit are generally posted for
one-year terms and are usually automatically renewed upon
maturity until such time as we have satisfied the commitment
secured by the letter of credit. We are obligated to reimburse
the issuer only if the beneficiary collects on the letter of
credit. We believe that it is unlikely we will be required to
fund a claim under our outstanding letters of credit. As of
December 31, 2007, the full amount of the letters of credit
was supported by our credit facility which expires November 2011. |
|
(4) |
|
In addition to the letters of credit described above, we
currently have contingent obligations of $33.5 million
related to our asset sales and joint venture transactions. We
have agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties
associated with such disposition transactions with letters of
credit or interest-bearing cash investments. We have
interest-bearing cash investments of $23.0 million included
in Deferred charges and other assets pledged as
collateral for certain of these contingent obligations. We do
not believe we will ultimately be required to fund to third
parties any claims against these representations and warranties.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recognized
$35.8 million of contractual obligations related to
representations and warranties associated with the disposition
of our funeral operations in France. The remaining obligations
of $23.5 million at December 31, 2007 are primarily
related to certain foreign taxes and certain litigation matters.
This amount is recorded in Other liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheet. See Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 13 for
additional information related to this obligation. |
|
(5) |
|
In certain states and provinces, we have withdrawn allowable
distributable earnings including unrealized gains prior to the
maturity or cancellation of the related contract. In the event
of market declines, we may be required to re-deposit portions or
all of these amounts into the respective trusts in some future
period. |
Financial
Assurances
In support of our operations, we have entered into arrangements
with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to
issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance
and/or as
required by existing state and local regulations. The surety
bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the
majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been
used to support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales
activities. The obligations underlying these surety bonds are
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred
preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and
cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other
activities, is described below.
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Preneed funeral
|
|
$
|
134.9
|
|
|
$
|
137.0
|
|
Preneed cemetery:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise and services
|
|
|
148.0
|
|
|
|
162.0
|
|
Pre-construction
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations
|
|
|
289.3
|
|
|
|
307.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed business permits
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total surety bonds outstanding
|
|
$
|
303.1
|
|
|
$
|
323.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post
surety bonds where allowed by state law. We post the surety
bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received
from the customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally
determined by the total amount of the preneed contract that
would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with
applicable state law. For the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005, we had $38.4 million,
$50.9 million and $64.0 million, respectively, of cash
receipts attributable to bonded sales. These amounts do not
consider reductions associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or
other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically
renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts,
unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for
cemetery pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the
surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety
bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety
company was to cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain
replacement surety assurance from another surety company or fund
a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond
amount. Management does not expect we will be required to fund
material future amounts related to these surety bonds because of
lack of surety capacity.
Preneed
Funeral and Cemetery Activities and Backlog of
Contracts
In addition to selling our products and services to client
families at the time of need, we sell price-guaranteed preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral
or cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and
cemetery services or merchandise will not be provided until some
time in the future, most states and provinces require that all
or a portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed
funeral and cemetery contracts be paid into merchandise and
service trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service
is performed. In certain situations, as described above, where
permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a surety bond as
financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed funeral
or cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust
accounts. Our backlog of funeral and cemetery contracts shown
below represents the total amount of future revenues we have
under contract at the end of 2007 and 2006.
Trust-Funded Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The funds deposited into trust (in
accordance with various state and provincial laws) are invested
by independent trustees in accordance with the investment
guidelines established by statute or, where the prudent investor
rule is applicable, the guidelines established by the Investment
Committee of our Board of Directors. We retain any funds above
the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use
them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the
selling and administrative costs of the preneed programs.
Investment earnings associated with the trust investments are
expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing the
preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the
future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale.
The preneed funeral and cemetery trust assets are consolidated
and recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at market value.
Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in
the trust and distributed as the revenue associated with the
preneed funeral or cemetery contract is recognized or cancelled
by the customer. In certain states and provinces, the trusts are
allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us
prior to that date.
25
If a preneed funeral or cemetery contract is cancelled prior to
delivery, state or provincial law determines the amount of the
refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the
attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive
the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously
undistributed net investment earnings and, where required, issue
a refund to the customer. We retain excess funds, if any, and
recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any
investment earnings payable to the customer) as revenue in our
consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions,
we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts
deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. Based on
our historical experience, we have included a cancellation
reserve for preneed funeral and cemetery contracts in our
consolidated balance sheet of $143.7 million and
$151.3 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
The cash flow activity over the life of a trust funded preneed
funeral or cemetery contract from the date of sale to its
recognition or cancellation is captured in the operating cash
flow line items (Increase) decrease in preneed receivables
and trust investments, Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed
revenue, Increase (decrease) in non-controlling interest and
Net income (loss) in the consolidated statement of cash
flows. While the contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided
by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer
and any distributed investment earnings. At the time of death
maturity, we receive the principal and undistributed investment
earnings from the funeral trust and any remaining receivable due
from the customer. At the time of delivery or storage of
cemetery merchandise and service items for which we were
required to deposit funds to trust, we receive the principal and
undistributed investment earnings from the cemetery trust. There
is generally no remaining receivable due from the customer, as
our policy is to deliver preneed cemetery merchandise and
service items only upon payment of the contract balance in full.
This cash flow at the time of service, delivery, or storage is
generally less than the associated revenue recognized, thus
reducing cash flow from operating activities.
26
The tables below detail our North America results of preneed
funeral and cemetery production and maturities, excluding
insurance contracts, for the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Funeral:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust-funded (including bonded):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production
|
|
$
|
148.5
|
|
|
$
|
121.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts)
|
|
|
30,363
|
|
|
|
27,062
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
$
|
210.1
|
|
|
$
|
166.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
46,998
|
|
|
|
40,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
399.3
|
|
|
$
|
308.0
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
272.8
|
|
|
|
219.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production
|
|
|
672.1
|
|
|
|
527.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production deferred to backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
169.7
|
|
|
$
|
146.9
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
204.7
|
|
|
|
164.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production deferred to backlog
|
|
|
374.4
|
|
|
|
311.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue recognized from backlog:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
$
|
176.1
|
|
|
$
|
143.5
|
|
Atneed
|
|
|
203.4
|
|
|
|
162.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue recognized from backlog
|
|
|
379.5
|
|
|
|
305.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-Funded Preneed Funeral
Contracts: Where permitted by state or provincial
law, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by
purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third-party
insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as general
sales agent for the insurance company. These general agency
commissions (GA revenues) are based on a percentage per contract
sold and are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance
purchase transaction between the customer and third-party
insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs incurred
pursuant to the sale of insurance-funded preneed funeral
contracts are expensed as incurred. The policy amount of the
insurance contract between the customer and the third-party
insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed
funeral contract. We do not reflect the unfulfilled
insurance-funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our
consolidated balance sheet. Approximately 66% of our North
America preneed funeral production in 2007 relates to
insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts.
The third-party insurance company collects funds related to the
insurance contract directly from the customer. The life
insurance contracts include a death benefit escalation
provision, which is expected to offset the inflationary costs of
providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the
future at the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the
preneed sale. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy
benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral
contract at the time of need.
Additionally, we may receive cash overrides based on achieving
certain dollar volume targets of life insurance policies sold as
a result of marketing agreements entered into in connection with
the sale of our insurance subsidiaries in 2000.
27
The table below details the North America results of
insurance-funded preneed funeral production and maturities for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the number
of contracts associated with those transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Preneed funeral insurance-funded(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production
|
|
$
|
285.8
|
|
|
$
|
192.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts)
|
|
|
50,566
|
|
|
|
36,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General agency revenue
|
|
$
|
44.8
|
|
|
$
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
$
|
241.6
|
|
|
$
|
192.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts)
|
|
|
51,240
|
|
|
|
42,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. |
North America Backlog of Preneed Funeral and Cemetery
Contracts: The following table reflects our North
America backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral and
cemetery contract revenues including amounts related to
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
at December 31, 2007 and 2006. Additionally, the table
reflects our North America backlog of unfulfilled
insurance-funded contracts (which was not included in our
consolidated balance sheet) at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we
believe will cancel before maturity based on historical
experience.
The table also reflects our North America preneed funeral and
cemetery receivables and trust investments (market and cost
bases) associated with the backlog of deferred preneed funeral
and cemetery contract revenues, net of the estimated
cancellation allowance. We believe that the table below is
meaningful because it sets forth the aggregate amount of future
revenues we expect to recognize as a result of preneed sales, as
well as the amount of assets associated with those revenues.
Because the future revenues exceed the asset amounts, future
revenues will exceed the cash distributions actually received
from the associated trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions)
|
|
|
Backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
1.62
|
|
Backlog of insurance-funded preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
|
$
|
4.89
|
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
|
$
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed
funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
Insurance policies associated with insurance-funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral revenues
|
|
$
|
4.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.67
|
|
|
$
|
4.43
|
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of deferred cemetery revenues,
net of estimated allowance for cancellation
|
|
$
|
1.27
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.36
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
The market value of funeral and cemetery trust investments was
based primarily on quoted market prices at December 31,
2007 and 2006. The difference between the backlog and asset
amounts represents the contracts for which we have posted surety
bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts
collected from customers that were not required to be deposited
into trust, and allowable cash distributions from trust assets.
The table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from
insurance companies through the assignment of policy proceeds
related to insurance-funded funeral contracts.
Results
of Operations Years Ended December 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005
Management
Summary
Our primary focus in 2007 was on integrating the operations of
former Alderwoods businesses into our own. These businesses
contributed $558.9 million in revenues during 2007. Other
key highlights in 2007 included:
|
|
|
|
|
an improvement in 2007 gross margin percentage to 20.5%
from 20.0% in 2006;
|
|
|
|
a 5.3% increase in North America comparable average revenue per
funeral service compared to 2006, which more than offset a 4.0%
decline in North America comparable funeral services performed;
and
|
|
|
|
comparable cemetery revenue increased $16.8 million, or
3.1%, in 2007 compared to 2006.
|
Results
of Operations
In 2007, we reported consolidated net income of
$247.7 million ($.85 per diluted share) compared to net
income in 2006 of $56.5 million ($.19 per diluted share)
and a net loss in 2005 of $127.9 million ($(.42) per
diluted share). These results were impacted by large
non-recurring items that decreased earnings, including:
|
|
|
|
|
after-tax accounting changes of $187.5 million in 2005;
|
|
|
|
net after-tax losses on asset sales of $50.1 million in
2006 and $31.2 million in 2005;
|
|
|
|
after-tax losses from the early extinguishment of debt of
$8.7 million in 2007, $10.7 million in 2006, and
$9.3 million in 2005;
|
|
|
|
after-tax expenses related to our acquisition and integration of
Alderwoods of $16.5 million in 2007 and $4.3 million
in 2006;
|
|
|
|
after-tax expenses related to our Alderwoods bridge financing of
$3.9 million in 2006; and
|
|
|
|
after-tax expenses to settle our Cash Balance pension plan of
$6.5 million in 2007.
|
Significant non-recurring items that increased earnings included:
|
|
|
|
|
state net operating loss tax benefits of $11.9 million in
2005;
|
|
|
|
after-tax earnings from discontinued operations of
$4.4 million in 2007, $3.9 million in 2006, and
$4.5 million in 2005;
|
|
|
|
net after-tax gain from the sale of assets of $6.0 million
in 2007;
|
|
|
|
after-tax gain on redemption of securities of $99.8 million
in 2007; and
|
|
|
|
after-tax gain on sale of our equity investment in French
operations of $17.6 million in 2007.
|
29
Consolidated
Versus Comparable Results Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005
The table below reconciles our consolidated GAAP results to our
comparable, or same store, results for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005. We define
comparable operations (or same store operations) as those
funeral and cemetery locations that were owned for the entire
period beginning January 1, 2006 and ending
December 31, 2007. The following tables present operating
results for funeral and cemetery locations that were owned by us
for all three years. As implied by our definition of comparable
operations, these results specifically exclude any impact from
the Alderwoods acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/New
|
|
|
Associated with
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,518.2
|
|
|
$
|
389.2
|
|
|
$
|
75.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,053.9
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
760.0
|
|
|
|
169.7
|
|
|
|
36.7
|
|
|
|
553.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,278.2
|
|
|
|
558.9
|
|
|
|
111.8
|
|
|
|
1,607.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
2,285.3
|
|
|
$
|
558.9
|
|
|
$
|
111.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,614.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
308.4
|
|
|
$
|
85.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
222.2
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
159.9
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
118.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468.3
|
|
|
|
124.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
340.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
468.5
|
|
|
$
|
124.8
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
340.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition/ New
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,155.3
|
|
|
$
|
30.4
|
|
|
$
|
83.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,041.1
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
591.1
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
536.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746.4
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
|
|
|
124.3
|
|
|
|
1,577.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,752.9
|
|
|
$
|
44.2
|
|
|
$
|
124.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,584.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
241.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
230.0
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
108.3
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
104.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349.9
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
334.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
350.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
$
|
334.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
Comparable
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,149.5
|
|
|
$
|
142.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,006.8
|
|
Cemetery revenue
|
|
|
560.4
|
|
|
|
56.0
|
|
|
|
504.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,709.9
|
|
|
|
198.7
|
|
|
|
1,511.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,717.0
|
|
|
$
|
198.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,518.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
$
|
220.7
|
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
211.0
|
|
Cemetery gross profits
|
|
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
81.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
302.6
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
292.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$
|
303.0
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
292.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our
consolidated average revenue per funeral service for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005. We calculate
average revenue per funeral service by dividing consolidated
North America funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA)
revenues and other revenues in order to avoid distorting
31
our averages of normal funeral services revenue, by the number
of funeral services performed during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average revenue per funeral
service)
|
|
|
Consolidated funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,525.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,161.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,156.6
|
|
Less: GA revenues
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
Less: Other revenues
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Consolidated funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,468.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,114.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,091.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated funeral services performed
|
|
|
299,801
|
|
|
|
235,384
|
|
|
|
251,020
|
|
Consolidated average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$
|
4,897
|
|
|
$
|
4,734
|
|
|
$
|
4,347
|
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our
comparable average revenue per funeral service for the years
ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005. We calculate
average revenue per funeral service by dividing comparable
funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA) revenues and
other revenues in order to avoid distorting our averages of
normal funeral services revenue, by the comparable number of
funeral services performed during the period. The following data
specifically excludes any impact from the Alderwoods acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except average revenue per funeral
service)
|
|
|
Comparable funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,061.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,047.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,013.8
|
|
Less: GA revenues
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
33.6
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
Less: Other revenues
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Comparable funeral revenue
|
|
$
|
1,016.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,006.2
|
|
|
$
|
975.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable funeral services performed
|
|
|
201,377
|
|
|
|
209,775
|
|
|
|
221,883
|
|
Comparable average revenue per funeral service
|
|
$
|
5,049
|
|
|
$
|
4,797
|
|
|
$
|
4,396
|
|
Funeral
Results
Funeral
Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were
$1,525.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to $1,161.8 million in the same period of 2006.
The increase is primarily the result of the addition of
Alderwoods and other operations, which contributed an additional
$358.8 million in funeral revenues. Alderwoods average
revenue per funeral for the year ended December 31, 2007
was approximately 2% above our expectation and Alderwoods
funeral case volume was approximately 3% below our expectations,
which we believe is generally consistent with death trends in
North America in 2007. This is partially offset by an
$8.7 million decline in revenue from divested locations.
Our comparable funeral revenues were up $13.4 million, or
1.3% compared to the year ended December 31, 2006 primarily
driven by the continued benefits of our strategic pricing
initiatives at legacy locations.
Consolidated revenue from funeral operations increased
$5.2 million in 2006 compared to 2005 primarily due to
$30.4 million of revenues from former Alderwoods businesses
since the acquisition date, combined with higher average revenue
per funeral service and an increase in floral revenues of
approximately $10.7 million. These increases were partially
offset by a decline in funeral services performed due to a
decrease in funeral properties as a result of our continuing
efforts to dispose of non-strategic locations. We also believe
the decline reflects a decrease in the number of deaths in the
markets we serve. Additionally, Kenyons revenue declined
$19.3 million to $4.6 million, as services related to
catastrophic events in Asia, Greece, and the U.S. Gulf
Coast in 2005 were not repeated in 2006. Comparable funeral
revenue in 2006 increased $33.8 million, or 3.3%, over
2005. The increase was primarily a result of an increase in
comparable atneed revenue resulting from an increase in funeral
services performed and higher average revenue per funeral.
32
Funeral
Services Performed
Our consolidated funeral services performed increased 64,417, or
27.4%, in the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the
same period in 2006. This increase includes 92,338 funeral
services performed by locations acquired in the Alderwoods
transaction. This increase was partially offset by a decrease
from divested locations of 19,523 funeral services.
Additionally, our comparable funeral services performed
decreased 8,398, or 4.0%, which we attribute to certain local
business decisions to exit unprofitable business relationships,
primarily related to highly-discounted, low-service cremation
funeral activities, and a decrease in the number of deaths in
our markets in 2007. The local business decisions mentioned
above were made based on our customer segmentation strategy,
which focuses on more profitable opportunities with certain
customer segments. We will continue to evaluate existing
relationships and may ultimately choose to exit other markets as
we continue to employ our strategy. Our comparable cremation
rate of 41.6% in the year ended December 31, 2007 was up
slightly compared to 41.5% for the same period in 2006. We have
seen a relative stabilization in our cremation rate despite the
continued increase in cremation generally in the markets where
we compete, reflecting the impact of our decision to exit
unprofitable immediate cremation activities.
Average
Revenue Per Funeral Service
Our consolidated average revenue per funeral service increased
$163, or 3.4%, in the year ended December 31, 2007 over the
same period of 2006. Our comparable average revenue per funeral
service (which excludes the Alderwoods locations) increased
5.3%, or $252 per funeral service, reflecting the continued
benefits from our strategic pricing initiative at legacy
locations. Pursuant to this strategy, we have realigned our
pricing focus away from our products to our service offerings,
reflecting our competitive advantage and concentration on those
services that our customers believe add the most value. This
strategy has resulted in a decline in highly discounted,
low-service cremation funeral services. These initiatives,
although reducing our funeral services volume, have generated
improvements in average revenue per funeral service. Our
strategic pricing initiative was implemented at former
Alderwoods locations in 2007. We expect our average revenue per
funeral service to continue to improve as we see the full impact
of this initiative.
Funeral
Gross Profit
Consolidated funeral gross profits increased $66.6 million
in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily due to additional gross
profits contributed from former Alderwoods and other operations
of $78.5 million. This increase was partially offset by a
$3.9 million decline in gross profit from divested
locations. Gross profit from our comparable funeral locations
decreased $8.0 million, or 3.5%, and our comparable gross
margin percentage decreased to 21.0% from 22.0% in 2007 compared
to 2006. Comparable gross profits before allocation of corporate
and field overhead costs increased $8.2 million, or 2.7%.
Our corporate and field overhead includes costs related to the
addition of the former Alderwoods funeral homes and
cemeteries. We cannot separately identify and allocate these
additional overhead costs; therefore, they negatively impact our
gross profit and gross margin percentage for 2007 on a
comparable basis.
Consolidated funeral gross profit increased $20.9 million
in 2006, primarily due to decreases in costs and
$7.3 million contributed in gross profits from former
Alderwoods operations. Significant cost decreases included a
$10.7 million decline in salary and fringe expense due to
more centralization and standardization in our organization as
well as a decrease in selling costs resulting from lower funeral
production. These gross profit improvements were partially
offset by a $4.6 million decline in Kenyons gross
profits, which resulted from fixed costs incurred over a lower
revenue base. Comparable funeral gross profit increased
$19.0 million, or 9.0%, in 2006 versus 2005. The comparable
funeral gross margin percentage increased to 22.0% in 2006
compared to 20.9% in 2005 due to the comparable revenue
increases described above and continued cost improvements to our
infrastructure, including a decrease in salary and fringe
expense totaling $5.8 million.
33
Cemetery
Results
Cemetery
Revenue
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations increased
$168.9 million, or 28.6%, in 2007 versus 2006, reflecting a
$155.9 million increase from operations acquired from
Alderwoods. This increase was partially offset by a
$3.8 million decline in revenue from divested locations.
Our comparable cemetery revenues rose $16.8 million, or
3.1%, in 2007 compared to 2006, as a result of our
tiered-product strategy, which focused on the development of
high-end cemetery property.
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations increased
$30.7 million in 2006 compared to 2005, reflecting higher
atneed revenues and increased delivery of preneed merchandise
combined with a $13.8 million increase from acquired
Alderwoods operations. Also contributing to the increase was the
receipt and recognition of $7.9 million in endowment care
income in 2006. Comparable cemetery revenue increased
$32.4 million or 6.4% in 2006 compared to 2005. This
increase primarily resulted from a $10.0 million increase
in cemetery atneed revenues as well as an increase in trust fund
income, partially offset by lower interest income on preneed
receivables.
Cemetery
Gross Profits
Consolidated cemetery gross profit increased $51.6 million,
or 47.6%, in 2007 compared to 2006, reflecting the addition of
$36.6 million of gross profit from acquired Alderwoods
operations and $1.0 million of incremental gross profit from
divested locations in 2007 compared to 2006. Consolidated
cemetery gross margin percentage grew to 21.0% in 2007 compared
to 18.3% in 2006. Our comparable cemetery gross profit increased
$14.0 million, or 13.4%, in 2007 compared to 2006 as
increases in revenue were partially offset by the receipt and
recognition of $7.9 million of endowment care trust fund
income in 2006. The comparable cemetery margin percentage was
21.3% in 2007 compared to 19.4% in 2006.
Consolidated cemetery gross profit increased $26.4 million
or 32.2% in 2006 compared to 2005. Cemetery gross margin
percentages increased from 14.6% in 2005 to 18.3% in 2006,
reflecting $2.4 million from acquired Alderwoods
operations, the $7.9 million of endowment care income
received and recognized in 2006 related to the resolution of a
dispute over the funds, and an increase in other trust fund
income. Comparable cemetery gross profits increased
$22.8 million in 2006 compared to 2005. The comparable
cemetery gross margin percentage increased to 19.4% in 2006 from
16.1% in 2005. These improvements were a result of the increases
in atneed cemetery revenues and in endowment care trust fund
income discussed above and cost improvements. Selling and salary
expenses decreased in 2006 due to increased centralization
within our organization. The decrease in these expenses was
partially offset by higher maintenance and utilities costs
primarily resulting from increased fuel costs.
Other
Financial Statement Items
General
and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $137.4 million in
2007 compared to $94.9 million in 2006 and
$84.8 million in 2005. For 2007 compared to 2006, general
and administrative costs increased $42.5 million primarily
due to $28.4 million in costs related to the integration of
Alderwoods and $11.2 million in costs to terminate our Cash
Balance pension plan. For 2006 compared to 2005, general and
administrative costs increased $10.1 million primarily due
to $7.0 million in expenses related to our acquisition of
Alderwoods and $3.9 million of share-based compensation
costs related to stock options expensed under FAS 123(R).
These costs were partially offset by a decrease in salary
expense.
Gains
(Losses) on Dispositions and Impairment Charges, Net
In 2007, we recognized a $16.9 million net pre-tax gain on
asset divestitures. This gain was primarily associated with the
disposition of funeral and cemetery businesses in the United
States and Canada, including a $21.8 million gain on assets
sold to StoneMor Partners LP, a $21.1 million gain from
real estate dispositions, partially offset by $26.0 million
in losses on FTC and non-strategic divestitures.
34
In 2006, we recognized a $58.7 million net pre-tax
impairment loss. This loss was primarily associated with the
disposition of underperforming funeral and cemetery businesses
in North America, including a $16.6 million impairment of
assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP in 2006 and a
$26.4 million impairment of certain assets in Michigan for
which we have commenced a plan to sell and which are classified
as assets held for sale at December 31, 2007. Additionally,
in connection with the Alderwoods acquisition, we entered into a
consent agreement with the Federal Trade Commission to divest
certain of our non-Alderwoods properties, and we recorded an
impairment charge of $12.9 million for these properties
which were owned by us and classified as assets held for sale at
December 31, 2006.
In 2005, we recognized a $26.1 million net pretax loss from
impairments. This loss was primarily associated with the
disposition of underperforming funeral and cemetery businesses
in North America (including a $30.0 million impairment of
assets sold to StoneMor Partners LP). The net loss was partially
offset by the release of approximately $15.6 million in
indemnification liabilities previously recorded in connection
with the 2004 sales of our United Kingdom and French operations.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense increased to $146.9 million in 2007,
compared to $123.4 million in 2006 and $103.7 million
in 2005.
The increase of $23.5 million in interest expense between
2007 and 2006 resulted primarily from an incremental
$31.5 million of interest costs related to our increased
borrowings to finance the Alderwoods transaction.
The increase of $19.7 million in interest expense between
2006 and 2005 resulted primarily from $6.4 million in
one-time bridge financing costs related to the Alderwoods
acquisition and an incremental $10.5 million of interest
costs related to our increased borrowings to finance the
Alderwoods acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2006.
Interest
Income
Interest income of $11.7 million in 2007, compared to
$31.2 million in 2006, reflects the decrease in our cash
balance as a result of the acquisition of Alderwoods.
Interest income of $31.2 million in 2006, a
$14.5 million increase over 2005, reflects the increase in
our cash balance for most of 2006 coupled with an increase in
interest rates.
Loss on
Early Extinguishment of Debt
During 2007, we repaid $100.0 million of our term loan,
$50 million of our Series A Senior Notes, and
purchased $149.8 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.50% Notes due 2008 and $173.8 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.70% Notes due 2009 in a tender
offer. As a result of these transactions, we recognized a loss
of $15.0 million, which represents the write-off of
unamortized deferred loan costs of $3.3 million, a
$1.0 million loss on a related interest rate hedge, and
$10.7 million in premiums paid to extinguish the debt.
During 2006, we repurchased $139.0 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.7% notes due 2009 in a tender
offer and prepaid $50.0 million of our term loan in
December 2006. As a result of these transactions, we recognized
a loss of $17.5 million, which is comprised of the
redemption premiums paid of $8.2 million and the write-off
of unamortized deferred loan costs of $9.3 million.
During 2005, we repurchased $16.6 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.70% notes due 2009 in the open
market, and $0.3 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. Also during 2005,
we redeemed $130.0 million aggregate principal amount of
our 6.875% notes due 2007 and $139.3 million aggregate
principal amount of our 7.20% notes due 2006, pursuant to a
tender offer for such notes. As a result of these transactions,
we recognized a loss of $14.3 million, which is comprised
of the redemption premiums paid of $12.2 million and the
write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of
$2.1 million.
35
Equity in
Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Equity income from our equity investment in France was
$36.6 million in 2007 compared to $1.1 million in
2006. This increase is primarily attributable to equity earnings
generated by the sale of our unconsolidated subsidiarys
business operations in the fourth quarter of 2007.
Gain on
Redemption of Securities
Gain on redemption of securities was $158.1 million in 2007
compared to $10.9 million in 2006. The 2007 and 2006 income
is primarily related to the redemption of our convertible
preferred equity certificates in our unconsolidated equity
interest. This investment was liquidated in the fourth quarter
of 2007. See Note 20 to the consolidated financial
statements.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The 2007 consolidated effective tax rate was 37.1%, compared to
46.0% and 36.8% in 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the
fourth quarter of 2007, we generated taxable capital gains from
the sale of our equity investment in our French operations which
allowed us to recognize the benefit of capital loss
carryforwards that we had previously concluded were more likely
than not to expire unutilized. The 2007, 2006, and 2005 tax
rates were negatively impacted by permanent differences between
the book and tax bases of North American asset dispositions and
the 2005 tax rate was partially offset by state net operating
loss benefits.
Weighted
Average Shares
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was
290.4 million in 2007, compared to 297.4 million in
2006 and 306.7 million in 2005. The decrease in all years
was mainly due to our share repurchase program, which began in
the third quarter of 2004.
Critical
Accounting Policies, Recent Accounting Pronouncements and
Accounting Changes
Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the
accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made
by management during their preparation. See Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data,
Note 2 of this
Form 10-K.
Estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of assets
and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could
differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with
the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting
measurements. The following is a discussion of our critical
accounting policies pertaining to revenue recognition, business
combinations, the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets,
and the use of estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
Funeral revenue is recognized when funeral services are
performed. Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts
due for funeral services already performed. Revenue associated
with cemetery merchandise and services is recognized when the
service is performed or merchandise is delivered. Revenue
associated with cemetery property interment rights is recognized
in accordance with the retail land sales provision of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until a
minimum percentage (10%) of the sales price has been collected.
Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery
property is deferred until it is constructed and 10% of the
sales price is collected.
When a customer enters into a preneed funeral trust contract,
the entire purchase price is deferred and the revenue is
recognized at the time of maturity. The revenues associated with
a preneed cemetery contract, however, may be recognized as
different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery
interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when
a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the
property has been constructed or is available for interment. For
personalized marker merchandise, with the customers
direction generally obtained at the time of sale, we can choose
to order, store, and transfer title to the customer. Upon the
earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in our
cemetery, we recognize the associated revenues and record the
cost of sale. For services and non-personalized merchandise
(such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the services are
performed and the merchandise is delivered. In situations in
which we have no further obligation or involvement related to
the merchandise, we recognize revenues and record the cost of
sales in accordance with SAB 104 upon the earlier of vendor
storage of these items or delivery in our cemetery.
36
Business
Combinations
We apply the principles provided in SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141) when we
acquire businesses. Tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair value and
goodwill recognized for any difference between the price of the
acquisition and our fair value determination. We customarily
estimate our purchase costs and other related transactions known
to us at closing of the acquisition. To the extent that
information not available to us at the closing date subsequently
becomes available during the allocation period, as defined by
SFAS 141, we may adjust our goodwill, assets, or
liabilities associated with the acquisition. These changes are
disclosed in future reports as they occur.
On November 28, 2006, we completed the acquisition of
Alderwoods for $20.00 per share in cash, resulting in a purchase
price of $1.2 billion, which includes the refinancing of
$357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million of
Alderwoods debt resulting in goodwill of
$183.0 million. Alderwoods properties have been
substantially integrated into our operations as of
December 31, 2007. These properties are operated in the
same manner as our incumbent properties, under our leadership,
and are reported in the appropriate reporting unit (segment)
whether funeral or cemetery in our consolidated financial
statements. See Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data, Note 4 of this
Form 10-K
for details related to this acquisition.
Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
We test for impairment of goodwill using a two-step approach as
prescribed in SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (SFAS 142). The first
step of our goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill.
Our reporting units are the funeral and cemetery segments. We do
not record an impairment of goodwill in instances where the fair
value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. If fair
value is less than the carrying amount for a reporting unit, we
would perform the second step, which is to compare the implied
fair value of goodwill (as defined in SFAS 142) to the
carrying amount of goodwill. If the carrying amount of a
reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount
equal to that excess. Fair market value of a reporting unit is
determined using a calculation based on multiples of revenue and
multiples of EBITDA, or earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization, of both SCI and its competitors.
Based on our impairment tests performed during the fourth
quarter using September 30th financial information, there
was no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2007 or 2006.
We review our other non-goodwill long-lived assets for
impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and
assets not expected to provide any future service potential are
recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value
less estimated cost to sell. For additional information
regarding impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, see
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 18 of this
Form 10-K.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
(GAAP) requires management to make certain estimates and
assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the carrying
values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results
could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated
with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical
accounting measurements. Key estimates used by management, among
others, include:
Allowances We provide various allowances
and/or
cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and
atneed receivables, as well as for our preneed funeral and
preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based
on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. We also record
an estimate of general agency revenues that may be cancelled in
their first year, where the revenue would be charged back by the
insurance company. These estimates are impacted by a number of
factors, including changes in economy, relocation, and
demographic or competitive changes in our areas of operation.
37
Valuation of trust investments With the
implementation of revised FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an
Interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (FIN 46R), as of
March 31, 2004, we removed the receivables due from trust
assets recorded at cost from our balance sheet and added the
actual trust investments recorded at market value. The trust
investments include marketable securities that are classified as
available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
Where quoted market prices are not available, we estimate
the fair value based on the market value of the underlying real
estate and private equity investments. The underlying real
estate value is determined using the most recent appraisals. The
private equity investments are valued using appraisals and a
discounted cash flow methodology depending on the underlying
assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of
replacement cost, comparative sales analysis, and discounted
cash flow analysis.
Legal liability reserves Contingent
liabilities, principally for legal liability matters, are
recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred
and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Liabilities accrued for legal matters require judgments
regarding projected outcomes and range of loss based on
historical experience and recommendations of legal counsel.
However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and excessive
verdicts do occur. As disclosed in Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 13 of
this
Form 10-K,
our legal exposures and the ultimate outcome of these legal
proceedings could be material to operating results or cash flows
in any given quarter or year.
Depreciation of long-lived assets We
depreciate our long-lived assets ratably over their estimated
useful lives. These estimates of useful lives may be affected by
such factors as changing market conditions or changes in
regulatory requirements.
Valuation of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed We apply the principles of SFAS 141
when we acquire businesses. Tangible and intangible assets and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their fair value and
goodwill recognized for any difference between the price of
acquisition and our fair value determination. We customarily
estimate our purchase costs and other related transactions known
to us at closing of the acquisition. To the extent that
information not available to us at the closing date subsequently
becomes available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we may adjust our goodwill, assets, or
liabilities associated with the acquisition.
Income taxes Our ability to realize the
benefit of our federal and state deferred tax assets requires us
to achieve certain future earnings levels. We have established a
valuation allowance against a portion of our deferred tax assets
and could be required to further adjust that valuation allowance
if market conditions change materially and future earnings are,
or are projected to be, significantly different than our current
estimates.
We intend to permanently reinvest the unremitted earnings of
certain of our foreign subsidiaries in those businesses outside
the United States. Therefore, we have not provided for deferred
federal income taxes on such unremitted foreign earnings.
We file income tax returns, including tax returns for our
subsidiaries, with U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign
jurisdictions. Our tax returns are subject to routine compliance
review by the various federal, state, and foreign taxing
authorities in the jurisdictions in which we have operated and
filed tax returns in the ordinary course of business. We accrue
tax expense to reduce our tax benefits in those situations where
it is more likely than not that we will not prevail against the
tax authorities should they challenge the tax return position
that gave rise to the benefit. We believe that our tax returns
are materially correct as filed and we will vigorously defend
any challenges and proposed adjustments to those filing made by
the tax authorities. A number of years may elapse before
particular tax matters, for which we have established accruals,
are audited and finally resolved. The number of tax years that
may be subject to a tax audit varies depending on the tax
jurisdiction. In the United States, our open tax years are 1994
and 1996 to 2007. The Internal Revenue Service is currently
examining our tax returns for 1999 through 2005 and various
state jurisdictions are auditing years through 2006. While it is
often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of
resolution of any particular tax matter, we believe that our
accruals reflect the probable outcome of known tax
contingencies. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue
would reduce a deferred tax asset or require the payment of
cash. Favorable
38
resolution could result in reduced income tax expense reported
in the financial statements in the future. Our tax accruals are
presented in the balance sheet within Deferred income taxes
and Other liabilities.
Pension cost Our pension plans are frozen
with no benefits accruing to participants except interest.
Pension costs and liabilities are actuarially determined based
on certain assumptions, including the discount rate used to
compute future benefit obligations. On January 1, 2004, we
changed our method of accounting for gains and losses on pension
assets and obligations to recognize such gains and losses in our
consolidated statement of operations during the year in which
they occur. Therefore, the concept of an expected rate of return
on plan assets is not applicable.
Discount rates used to determine pension obligations for our
pension plans in 2007 and 2006 were 5.75% for the SCI SERP,
Senior SERP and Directors Plans and 5.5% for all other plans. We
determine the discount rate used to compute future benefit
obligations using an analysis of expected future benefit
payments. We verify the reasonableness of the discount rate by
comparing our rate to the rate earned on high-quality fixed
income investments, such as the Moodys Aa index. In 2007,
we completed the termination of our U.S. Pension Plan and there
are no remaining assets or liabilities under the plan.
A sensitivity analysis of the net periodic benefit cost was
modeled to assess the impact that changing discount rates could
have on pre-tax earnings. The sensitivity analysis assumes a
0.25% adverse change to the discount rate with all other
variables held constant. Using this model, our pre-tax earnings
would have decreased by less than $0.5 million, or less
than $.01 per diluted share, for the year ended
December 31, 2007. See Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 16 of this
Form 10-K
for more information related to our pension plans.
Insurance loss reserves We purchase
comprehensive general liability, morticians and cemetery
professional liability, automobile liability, and workers
compensation insurance coverages structured with high
deductibles. This high deductible insurance program means we are
primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and
losses covered by these policies. Historical insurance industry
experience indicates a high degree of inherent variability in
assessing the ultimate amount of losses associated with casualty
insurance claims. This is especially true with respect to
liability and workers compensation exposures due to the
extended period of time that transpires between when the claim
might occur and the full settlement of such claim, often many
years. We continually evaluate loss estimates associated with
claims and losses related to these insurance coverages falling
within the deductible of each coverage. Assumptions based on
factors such as claim settlement patterns, claim development
trends, claim frequency and severity patterns, inflationary
trends, and data reasonableness will generally affect the
analysis and determination of the best estimate of
the projected ultimate claim losses. The results of these
evaluations are used to both analyze and adjust our insurance
loss reserves.
As of December 31, 2007, reported losses within our
retention for workers compensation, general liability, and
auto liability incurred during the period May 1, 1987
through December 31, 2007 were approximately
$275.1 million over 20.7 years. The selected fully
developed ultimate settlement value estimated was
$329.5 million for the same period. Paid losses were
$259.6 million indicating a reserve requirement of
$69.9 million.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the balances in the reserve
for workers compensation, general, and auto liability and
the related activity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
49.0
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(31.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
67.7
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
35.9
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
(33.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
For discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and
accounting changes, see Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 3 of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data, Note 1 of this
Form 10-K.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, 89% and 82%, respectively,
of our total debt consisted of fixed rate debt at a weighted
average rate of 7.09% and 7.30%, respectively.
At December 31, 2007, approximately 14% of our
stockholders equity and 8% of our operating income were
denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian
dollar. Approximately 11% of our stockholders equity and
7% of our operating income were denominated in foreign
currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar, at December 31,
2006. We do not have a significant investment in foreign
operations that are in highly inflationary economies.
Marketable
Equity and Debt Securities Price Risk
In connection with our preneed funeral operations and preneed
cemetery merchandise and service sales, the related funeral and
cemetery trust funds own investments in equity and debt
securities and mutual funds, which are sensitive to current
market prices. Cost and market values as of December 31,
2007 are presented in Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data, Notes 5, 6, and 7 of
this
Form 10-K.
Market-Rate
Sensitive Instruments Interest Rate and Currency
Risk
We perform a sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of
interest rate and exchange rate risks on earnings. This analysis
determines the effect of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in
market rates. In actuality, market rate volatility is dependent
on many factors that are impossible to forecast. Therefore, the
adverse changes described below could differ substantially from
the hypothetical 10% change.
We are currently not subject to significant interest rate risk
on our outstanding debt as 89% of such debt has fixed rate
interest terms. The fair market value of our debt was
approximately $30.9 million less than its carrying value at
December 31, 2007. A fifty basis point increase in our
floating rate risk would increase interest expense by
$1 million.
A similar model was used to assess the impact of changes in
exchange rates for foreign currencies on our consolidated
statement of operations. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, our
foreign currency exposure was primarily associated with the
Canadian dollar, and the euro. A 10% adverse change in the
strength of the U.S. dollar relative to the foreign
currency instruments would have negatively affected our income
from our continuing operations on an annual basis, by
$0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
$0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
40
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
All other schedules have been omitted because the required
information is not applicable or is not present in amounts
sufficient to require submission or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
the related notes thereto.
41
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Service Corporation International:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Service Corporation International and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, the
Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) because material weaknesses in internal
control over financial reporting related to (i) the
accounting for income taxes and (ii) certain account
reconciliations existed as of that date. A material weakness is
a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal
control over financial reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the
annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses referred to
above are described in Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under
Item 9A. We considered these material weaknesses in
determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests
applied in our audit of the 2007 consolidated financial
statements and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting does
not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial
statements. The Companys management is responsible for
these financial statements and financial statement schedule, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting included in managements report
referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on
these financial statements, on the financial statement schedule,
and on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement and whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
uncertain income tax positions effective January 1, 2007,
its method of accounting for share-based compensation effective
January 1, 2006, and its method of accounting for deferred
selling costs related to preneed funeral and cemetery contracts
effective January 1, 2005.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
42
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Houston, Texas
March 2, 2008
43
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
|
$
|
1,717,007
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(1,816,803
|
)
|
|
|
(1,402,627
|
)
|
|
|
(1,413,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
468,500
|
|
|
|
350,261
|
|
|
|
303,042
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(137,406
|
)
|
|
|
(94,900
|
)
|
|
|
(84,834
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
16,920
|
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
|
(26,093
|
)
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
346,166
|
|
|
|
196,678
|
|
|
|
192,115
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(146,854
|
)
|
|
|
(123,399
|
)
|
|
|
(103,733
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
11,725
|
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
|
|
16,706
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(14,986
|
)
|
|
|
(17,532
|
)
|
|
|
(14,258
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
36,607
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on redemption of securities
|
|
|
158,133
|
|
|
|
10,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
386,987
|
|
|
|
97,449
|
|
|
|
87,127
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(143,670
|
)
|
|
|
(44,845
|
)
|
|
|
(32,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
|
243,317
|
|
|
|
52,604
|
|
|
|
55,091
|
|
Income from discontinued operations (net of income tax
(provision) benefit of $(4,818), $2,548 and $(5,961),
respectively)
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
4,506
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes (net of income tax
benefit of $117,428)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
247,729
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
.02
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.02
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
284,966
|
|
|
|
292,859
|
|
|
|
302,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
.02
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares
|
|
|
290,444
|
|
|
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
306,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
.13
|
|
|
$
|
.105
|
|
|
$
|
.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
44
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
168,594
|
|
|
$
|
39,880
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
113,793
|
|
|
|
107,194
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
73,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
36,203
|
|
|
|
39,535
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
Current assets held for sale
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
6,330
|
|
Other
|
|
|
27,261
|
|
|
|
43,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
421,327
|
|
|
|
238,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,434,403
|
|
|
|
1,516,676
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
1,428,057
|
|
|
|
1,522,584
|
|
Cemetery property, at cost
|
|
|
1,451,666
|
|
|
|
1,495,248
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net
|
|
|
1,569,534
|
|
|
|
1,641,353
|
|
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371,132
|
|
Non-current assets held for sale
|
|
|
122,626
|
|
|
|
349,311
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,198,153
|
|
|
|
1,264,272
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
400,734
|
|
|
|
436,545
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
905,744
|
|
|
|
893,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,932,244
|
|
|
$
|
9,729,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
343,392
|
|
|
$
|
341,173
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
36,594
|
|
|
|
46,176
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
Current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
46,305
|
|
|
|
17,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
426,440
|
|
|
|
407,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,820,106
|
|
|
|
1,912,696
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
526,668
|
|
|
|
537,792
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
753,876
|
|
|
|
754,193
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
140,623
|
|
|
|
177,341
|
|
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,498
|
|
Non-current liabilities held for sale
|
|
|
91,928
|
|
|
|
239,800
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
383,642
|
|
|
|
357,418
|
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
|
|
|
2,390,288
|
|
|
|
2,548,743
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
906,590
|
|
|
|
887,186
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par value, 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 262,858,169 and 293,222,114 issued and outstanding
(net of 1,961,300 and 10,000 treasury shares at par,
respectively)
|
|
|
262,858
|
|
|
|
293,222
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
1,874,600
|
|
|
|
2,135,649
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(797,965
|
)
|
|
|
(906,394
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
152,590
|
|
|
|
72,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,492,083
|
|
|
|
1,594,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,932,244
|
|
|
$
|
9,729,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
45
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
247,729
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
(4,412
|
)
|
|
|
(3,907
|
)
|
|
|
(4,506
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of cash
received
|
|
|
(19,566
|
)
|
|
|
(1,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
14,986
|
|
|
|
17,532
|
|
|
|
14,258
|
|
Premiums paid on early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
(11,650
|
)
|
|
|
(15,725
|
)
|
|
|
(12,186
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,538
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
130,429
|
|
|
|
96,684
|
|
|
|
74,866
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
Amortization of loan costs
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
16,328
|
|
|
|
10,788
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
10,754
|
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
34,652
|
|
|
|
38,257
|
|
|
|
24,854
|
|
(Gains) losses on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(16,920
|
)
|
|
|
58,683
|
|
|
|
26,093
|
|
Gain on redemption of securities
|
|
|
(158,133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
|
|
|
(10,469
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from
acquisitions and dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in receivables
|
|
|
(24,650
|
)
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
10,257
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(7,938
|
)
|
|
|
16,043
|
|
Increase (decrease) in payables and other liabilities
|
|
|
51,407
|
|
|
|
(10,607
|
)
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
Net effect of preneed funeral production and deliveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
102,080
|
|
|
|
33,064
|
|
|
|
29,717
|
|
Increase in deferred preneed funeral revenue
|
|
|
21,419
|
|
|
|
5,533
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Decrease in funeral non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(95,581
|
)
|
|
|
(29,968
|
)
|
|
|
(24,651
|
)
|
Net effect of preneed cemetery production and maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
83,689
|
|
|
|
34,018
|
|
|
|
49,601
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred preneed cemetery revenue
|
|
|
10,561
|
|
|
|
(28,916
|
)
|
|
|
24,583
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cemetery non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(77,640
|
)
|
|
|
21,626
|
|
|
|
(21,203
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing
operations
|
|
|
338,903
|
|
|
|
322,188
|
|
|
|
318,303
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
17,279
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
(5,451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
356,182
|
|
|
|
324,219
|
|
|
|
312,852
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(157,011
|
)
|
|
|
(97,527
|
)
|
|
|
(98,605
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(8,355
|
)
|
|
|
(1,301,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
410,689
|
|
|
|
83,146
|
|
|
|
223,518
|
|
Proceeds from redemption of securities
|
|
|
158,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,839
|
|
Proceeds from notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,835
|
|
Net (deposits) withdrawals of restricted funds and other
|
|
|
(17,347
|
)
|
|
|
8,639
|
|
|
|
7,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
386,667
|
|
|
|
(1,307,101
|
)
|
|
|
171,816
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from
discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8,546
|
)
|
|
|
9,599
|
|
|
|
(801
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
378,121
|
|
|
|
(1,297,502
|
)
|
|
|
171,015
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt
|
|
|
(29,234
|
)
|
|
|
(26,053
|
)
|
|
|
(85,692
|
)
|
Principal payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(27,057
|
)
|
|
|
(21,346
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Proceeds from long-term debt issued
|
|
|
398,996
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
|
297,041
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(6,443
|
)
|
|
|
(24,716
|
)
|
|
|
(5,538
|
)
|
Early extinguishments of debt
|
|
|
(472,545
|
)
|
|
|
(181,543
|
)
|
|
|
(291,277
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
52,938
|
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards
|
|
|
10,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(505,121
|
)
|
|
|
(27,870
|
)
|
|
|
(225,152
|
)
|
Payments of dividends
|
|
|
(34,629
|
)
|
|
|
(29,431
|
)
|
|
|
(22,637
|
)
|
Bank overdrafts and other
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
|
|
20,480
|
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(605,417
|
)
|
|
|
565,467
|
|
|
|
(326,385
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(2,113
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities from
continuing operations
|
|
|
(607,530
|
)
|
|
|
565,213
|
|
|
|
(326,385
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
1,168
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
128,714
|
|
|
|
(406,902
|
)
|
|
|
158,997
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
39,880
|
|
|
|
446,782
|
|
|
|
287,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
168,594
|
|
|
$
|
39,880
|
|
|
$
|
446,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
46
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Capital in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Stock, Par
|
|
|
Excess of
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Par Value
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
323,225
|
|
|
|
$
|
341,727
|
|
|
$
|
(18,502
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,395,057
|
|
|
$
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
$
|
(834,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,349
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,842,947
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127,941
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustments realized in net
income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,848
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,093
|
)
|
Dividends on common stock ($.10 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,052
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,052
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
3,161
|
|
|
|
(3,657
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(30,956
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,956
|
)
|
|
|
(194,196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225,152
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
294,809
|
|
|
|
|
343,771
|
|
|
|
(48,962
|
)
|
|
|
2,182,745
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
|
(962,905
|
)
|
|
|
70,499
|
|
|
|
1,581,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,511
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
Reclassification for translation adjustments realized in net
income, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,422
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,933
|
|
Adjustment for initial adoption of FAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Dividends on common stock ($.105 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,764
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,764
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
1,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,945
|
|
Reclassification of unearned compensation for restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593
|
)
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,942
|
)
|
|
|
51,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures and other
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Employee share-based compensation earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,035
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(3,420
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,420
|
)
|
|
|
(24,450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,870
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
293,222
|
|
|
|
$
|
293,232
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,135,649
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(906,394
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,594,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247,729
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,003
|
|
|
|
92,003
|
|
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
Reclassification for losses on available-for-sale securities
realized in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net gain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
Recognition of prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,292
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,021
|
|
Cumulative effect of FIN 48 adoption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,853
|
|
Tax benefits related to share-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,513
|
|
Dividends on common stock ($.13 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,426
|
)
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
7,732
|
|
|
|
|
7,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,938
|
|
Restricted stock award, net of forfeitures and other
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Employee share-based compensation earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,787
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock
|
|
|
(38,470
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,470
|
)
|
|
|
(297,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(505,121
|
)
|
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,459
|
)
|
|
|
36,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
262,858
|
|
|
|
$
|
264,819
|
|
|
$
|
(1,961
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,874,600
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(797,965
|
)
|
|
$
|
152,590
|
|
|
$
|
1,492,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to consolidated financial statements)
47
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
We are a provider of deathcare products and services, with a
network of funeral service locations and cemeteries primarily
operating in the United States and Canada. We divested our
unconsolidated investment in the funeral operations of an entity
in France in the fourth quarter of 2007. Additionally, we
divested 70% of Kenyon International Emergency Services
(Kenyon), a company that specializes in providing disaster
management services in mass fatality incidents as well as
training, planning, and crisis communications consulting
services, in the fourth quarter of 2007. Kenyons results
are included in our funeral operations segment through the date
of the sale. As part of the Alderwoods transaction, we acquired
an insurance business that we sold in the third quarter of 2007.
The operations of this business through the date of the sale are
presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated
statement of operations.
Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral
service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery
combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses.
Funeral service locations provide all professional services
relating to funerals and cremations, including the use of
funeral facilities and motor vehicles and preparation and
embalming services. Funeral-related merchandise, including
caskets, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers, and
other ancillary products and services, is sold at funeral
service locations. Cemeteries provide cemetery property
interment rights, including mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn
crypts, and sell cemetery related merchandise and services,
including stone and bronze memorials, markers, casket and
cremation memorialization products, merchandise installations,
and burial openings and closings. We also sell preneed funeral
and cemetery products and services whereby a customer
contractually agrees to the terms of certain products and
services to be provided in the future.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Service Corporation International (SCI) and all wholly-owned
subsidiaries. These statements also include the accounts of the
funeral trusts, cemetery merchandise and services trusts, and
perpetual care trusts in which we have a variable interest and
are the primary beneficiary. Intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Business
Combinations
We apply the principles provided in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) 141 when we acquire businesses.
Tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
are recorded at fair value and goodwill is recognized for any
difference between the price of the acquisition and our fair
value determination. We customarily estimate our purchase costs
and other related transactions known at closing of the
acquisition. To the extent that information is not practicably
available to us at the closing date subsequently becomes
available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we may adjust goodwill, assets, or liabilities
associated with the acquisition.
On November 28, 2006, we completed the acquisition of
Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) for $20.00 per share in
cash, resulting in a purchase price of $1.2 billion, which
includes the refinancing of $357.7 million and the
assumption of $2.2 million of Alderwoods debt.
Alderwoods properties were substantially integrated into our
operations at December 31, 2007. These properties are
operated in the same manner as our incumbent properties, and are
reported in the appropriate reporting unit (segment) whether
funeral or cemetery in our consolidated financial statements.
For further information related to this acquisition, see
Note 4.
48
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years to
conform to current period financial statement presentation with
no effect on our previously reported consolidated financial
position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Use of
Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting
period. As a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with an original
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At
December 31, 2007, the majority of our cash was invested in
commercial paper.
Accounts
Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Our trade receivables primarily consist of amounts due for
funeral services already performed. We provide various
allowances
and/or
cancellation reserves for our funeral and cemetery preneed and
atneed receivables as well as for our preneed funeral and
preneed cemetery deferred revenues. These allowances are based
on an analysis of historical trends and include, where
applicable, collection and cancellation activity. Atneed funeral
and cemetery receivables are considered past due after
30 days. Collections are managed by the locations until a
receivable is 180 days delinquent at which time it is fully
reserved and sent to a collection agency. These estimates are
impacted by a number of factors, including changes in economy,
relocation, and demographic or competitive changes in our areas
of operation.
Inventories
and Cemetery Property
Funeral and cemetery merchandise are stated at the lower of
average cost or market. Cemetery property is recorded at cost.
Inventory costs and cemetery property are primarily relieved
using specific identification in performance of a contract.
Property
and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and
repairs are charged to expense whereas renewals and major
replacements that extend the assets useful lives are
capitalized. Depreciation is recognized ratably over the
estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets.
Property is depreciated over a period ranging from seven to
forty years, equipment is depreciated over a period from three
to eight years and leasehold improvements are depreciated over
the shorter of the lease term or ten years. Depreciation expense
related to property and equipment was $115.7 million,
$84.0 million and $60.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. When
property is sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet;
resulting gains and losses are included in the consolidated
statement of operations in the period of sale or disposal.
Leases
We have lease arrangements primarily related to funeral service
locations and transportation equipment which were primarily
classified as capital leases at December 31, 2007. Lease
terms related to funeral home properties generally range from
one to 35 years with options to renew at varying terms.
Lease terms related to transportation
49
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
equipment generally range from one to five years with options to
renew at varying terms. We calculate operating lease expense
ratably over the lease term. We consider reasonably assured
renewal options and fixed escalation provisions in our
calculation. For more information related to leases, see
Note 13 to these consolidated financial statements.
Goodwill
The excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable
net assets acquired in business combinations accounted for as
purchases is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is tested annually
for impairment or as otherwise required by assessing the fair
value of each of our reporting units. As of December 31,
2007, our funeral segment reporting unit includes assets in
North America and Germany. Our cemetery segment reporting unit
includes assets in North America. The acquisition of Alderwoods
resulted in an increase in goodwill to both our funeral and
cemetery segments.
We test for impairment of goodwill in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142) annually during the fourth quarter
using information as of September 30.
We test for impairment of goodwill using a two-step approach as
prescribed in SFAS 142. The first step of our goodwill
impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit to
its carrying amount, including goodwill. Our reporting units are
the funeral and cemetery segments. We do not record an
impairment of goodwill in instances where the fair value of a
reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. If fair value is
less than the carrying amount for a reporting unit, we compare
the implied fair value of goodwill (as defined in
SFAS 142) to the carrying amount of goodwill. If the
carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied
fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in
an amount equal to that excess. Fair market value of a reporting
unit is determined using a calculation based on discounted cash
flows and multiples of EBITDA, or earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, of both SCI and its
competitors. Based on the impairment tests performed during the
fourth quarter using September 30 information, we concluded that
there was no impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2007 or
2006. See Note 9 of these consolidated financial statements.
Other
Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets include cemetery customer relationships,
trademarks and tradenames, and other assets primarily resulting
from the acquisition of Alderwoods. Our trademark, tradename,
and water rights assets are considered to have an indefinite
life and are not subject to amortization; rather, such assets
are tested annually, and as otherwise needed, for impairment.
Based on the impairment tests performed during the fourth
quarter using September 30 information, we concluded there was
no impairment of these intangible assets as of December 31,
2007. Our preneed deferred revenue intangible asset is relieved
using specific identification in performance of a contract. We
amortize all other intangible assets on a straight-line basis
over their estimated useful lives of
10-20 years.
Amortization expense for other intangible assets was
$14.7 million, $12.7 million, and $14.2 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively.
Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
We review our other definite-lived long-lived assets for
impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS 144). SFAS 144 requires that long-lived
assets to be held and used are reported at the lower of their
carrying amount or fair value. Assets to be disposed of and
assets not expected to provide any future service potential are
recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value
less estimated cost to sell.
50
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Treasury
Stock
We make treasury stock purchases in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions
and normal trading restrictions. We account for the repurchase
of our common stock under the par value method. We use the
average cost method upon the subsequent reissuance of treasury
shares. On December 15, 2007, we cancelled
36.5 million shares of common stock held in our treasury.
These retired treasury shares were changed to authorized but
unissued status.
Foreign
Currency Translation
All assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect as
of the end of the reporting period. Revenue and expense items
are translated at the average exchange rates for the reporting
period. The resulting translation adjustments are included in
stockholders equity as a component of Accumulated other
comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of
stockholders equity and balance sheet.
The functional currency of SCI and its subsidiaries is the
respective local currency. The transactional currency gains and
losses that arise from transactions denominated in currencies
other than the functional currencies of our operations are
recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated
statement of operations. We do not operate in countries which
are considered to have hyperinflationary economies.
Funeral
Operations
Revenue is recognized when the funeral services are performed
and funeral merchandise is delivered. Our funeral trade
receivables consist of amounts due for services already
performed and merchandise delivered. An allowance for doubtful
accounts is provided based on historical experience. We sell
price guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through various
programs providing for future funeral services at prices
prevailing when the agreements are signed. Revenues associated
with sales of preneed funeral contracts are deferred until such
time that the funeral services are performed. Allowances for
customer cancellations are based upon historical experience.
Sales taxes collected are recognized on a net basis.
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from funeral merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. We defer
investment earnings related to these merchandise and services
trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or services
are performed. Costs related to sales of merchandise and
services are charged to expense when merchandise is delivered
and services performed. See Note 5 to the consolidated
financial statements regarding preneed funeral activities.
Cemetery
Operations
Revenue associated with sales of cemetery merchandise and
services is recognized when the service is performed or
merchandise is delivered. Our cemetery trade receivables consist
of amounts due for services already performed and merchandise
already delivered. An allowance for doubtful accounts has been
provided based on historical experience. Revenue associated with
sales of preneed cemetery interment rights is recognized in
accordance with the retail land sales provisions of
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for the Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). Under SFAS 66, revenue
from constructed cemetery property is not recognized until 10%
of the sales price has been collected. Revenue related to the
preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred
until it is constructed and 10% of the sales price is collected.
Revenue associated with sales of preneed merchandise and
services is not recognized until the merchandise is delivered or
the services are performed. Allowances for customer
cancellations for preneed cemetery contracts are based upon
historical experience. For personalized marker merchandise, with
the customers direction generally obtained at the time of
sale, we can choose to order, store, and transfer title to the
customer. In situations in which we have no further obligation
or involvement related to the merchandise, we recognize revenues
and record the cost of sales in accordance with SAB 104
upon the earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in
our cemetery. For services and non-personalized merchandise
(such as
51
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
vaults), we defer the revenues until the services are performed
and the merchandise is delivered. Sales taxes collected are
recognized on a net basis.
Pursuant to state or provincial law, all or a portion of the
proceeds from cemetery merchandise or services sold on a preneed
basis may be required to be paid into trust funds. We defer
investment earnings related to these merchandise and services
trusts until the associated merchandise is delivered or services
are performed.
A portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property
interment rights is required by state or provincial law to be
paid into perpetual care trust funds. Investment earnings from
these trusts are distributed to us regularly, are recognized in
current cemetery revenues, and are intended to defray cemetery
maintenance costs, which are expensed as incurred. The principal
of such perpetual care trust funds generally cannot be withdrawn.
Costs related to the sale of property interment rights include
the property and construction costs specifically identified by
project. At the completion of the project, construction costs
are charged to expense in the same period revenue is recognized.
Costs related to sales of merchandise and services are charged
to expense when merchandise is delivered and when services are
performed. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial
statements regarding preneed cemetery activities.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are computed using the liability method. Deferred
taxes are provided on all temporary differences between the
financial bases and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We
record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets
when uncertainty regarding their realization exists. We intend
to permanently reinvest the unremitted earnings of certain of
our foreign subsidiaries in those businesses outside the United
States and, therefore, have not provided for deferred federal
income taxes on such unremitted foreign earnings. For more
information related to income taxes, see Note 10 to the
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
3.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
|
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which establishes
principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired (including goodwill), the liabilities assumed and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree. SFAS 141(R) also
establishes disclosure requirements to enable users of the
financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is
effective for us for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on after January 1, 2009. The impact of
adopting SFAS 141(R) will be dependent on the future
business combinations, if any, that we may pursue after its
effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160), which establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies
that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is
sometimes referred to as unconsolidated investment, is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be
reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial
statements. Among other requirements, SFAS 160 requires
consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include
the amounts attributable to both the parent and the
non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the
face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. The provisions of SFAS 160 are
effective for us on January 1, 2009. We are currently
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 160 on our
consolidated financial statements.
In March 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 06-10
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Agreements
(EITF 06-10).
EITF 06-10
provides guidance for determining a liability for the
postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and
measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of
a collateral assignment agreement. The provisions of
EITF 06-10
are
52
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting
EITF 06-10
on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits entities to choose to measure various financial assets
and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
are reported in earnings. The provisions of SFAS 159 are
effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. The adoption of
this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS 158),
which requires recognition of the funded status of a benefit
plan in the balance sheet. SFAS 158 also requires
recognition, in other comprehensive income, of certain gains and
losses that arise during the period but which were deferred
under previous pension accounting rules. SFAS 158 also
modifies the requirements for the timing of reports and
disclosures. SFAS 158 provides recognition and disclosure
elements that are effective for us during the year ended
December 31, 2006 and measurement date elements that will
be effective for us during the year ended December 31,
2008. We terminated our cash balance plan in 2007. We adopted
the recognition and disclosure element of SFAS 158
effective December 31, 2006 and as a result we reclassified
$0.6 million of unamortized prior service costs from
Other long-term liabilities to Accumulated other
comprehensive income.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for
us beginning January 1, 2008. We do not expect the adoption
of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on our financial
position or results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 06-5,
Accounting for Purchases of Life Insurance
Determining the Amount that Could be Realized in Accordance with
FASB Technical
Bulletin 85-4
(EITF 06-5).
The EITF concluded that a policyholder should consider any
additional amounts included in the contractual terms of the life
insurance policy in determining the amount that could be
realized under the insurance contract. For group policies
with multiple certificates or multiple policies with a group
rider, the EITF also tentatively concluded that the amount that
could be realized should be determined at the individual policy
or certificate level, (i.e., amounts that would be realized only
upon surrendering all of the policies or certificates would not
be included when measuring the assets). We adopted the
provisions of
EITF 06-5
effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of
EITF 06-5
had no impact to our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertain
income tax positions recognized in an enterprises
financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. This
interpretation requires companies to use a prescribed model for
assessing the financial statement recognition and measurement of
all tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax
returns. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. See Note 10 for a
detailed description of the impact of the adoption of
FIN 48 on our 2007 consolidated financial statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 133 and 140 (SFAS 155). SFAS 155
amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), and SFAS No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
(SFAS 140). This statement also resolves issues
addressed in Statement No. 133 Implementation Issue
No. D1, Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial
Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.
SFAS 155 permits fair value remeasurement for any
hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative
that otherwise would require bifurcation and clarifies which
interest-only
53
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the
requirements of SFAS 133. SFAS 140 is amended to
eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity
from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to
a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument. We adopted the provisions of SFAS 155 effective
January 1, 2007. The adoption of SFAS 155 had no
impact to our consolidated financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2005, we changed our method of
accounting for direct selling costs related to the acquisition
of preneed funeral and preneed cemetery contracts. Prior to this
change, we capitalized these direct selling costs and amortized
them in proportion to the revenue recognized. Under the new
method of accounting, we expense direct selling costs as
incurred. We believe the new method is preferable because it
better reflects the economics of our business. We recorded a
cumulative effect charge of $187.5 million, net of tax of
$117.4 million.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB
25). Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of the
intrinsic value method of accounting and requires companies to
recognize in the statement of operations the cost of employee
services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments
based on the grant-date fair value of those awards. We adopted
SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 utilizing the
modified-prospective transition method.
Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based
payments using the intrinsic value recognition method prescribed
by APB 25. Because all of our stock options were granted at
market value on the date of each grant, no stock-based
compensation expense related to stock options was reflected in
net income prior to adopting SFAS 123R.
Under the modified-prospective transition method, we recognize
compensation expense on a straight-line basis in our
consolidated financial statements issued subsequent to the date
of adoption for all share-based payments granted, modified or
settled after December 31, 2005, as well as for any awards
that were granted prior to December 31, 2005 for which
requisite service will be provided after December 31, 2005.
The compensation expense on awards granted prior to
December 31, 2005 is recognized using the fair values
determined for the pro forma disclosures on stock-based
compensation included in prior filings. The amount of
compensation expense recognized on awards that were not fully
vested at the date of SFAS 123R adoption excludes the
compensation expense cumulatively recognized in the pro forma
disclosures on stock-based compensation. Further, we assume no
forfeitures on restricted shares granted prior to the adoption
of SFAS 123R due to the nature of the employees to whom the
shares were granted; thus, we recorded no cumulative effect of
accounting change upon the adoption of SFAS 123R. For
further information on share-based compensation see Note 15.
At the adoption date of SFAS 123R, 1,959,283 options were
outstanding with alternative vesting methods. These shares were
fully vested prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R and,
as such, compensation expense for these options is not included
in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, 255,160 and 1,868,163,
respectively, of these options remain outstanding. No additional
options with alternative vesting methods were granted during the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R, Income from
continuing operations before income taxes was reduced by
$4.0 million, Income from continuing operations and
Net income were both reduced by $2.2 million, and
basic and diluted earnings per share were both reduced by $.01
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Results for the year ended December 31, 2005 have not been
restated to reflect the impact of compensation expense for our
stock option plans. If, prior to January 1, 2006, we had
elected to recognize compensation expense
54
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for our stock option plans, based on the fair value of awards at
the grant dates, Net loss and Loss per share would
have changed for the year ended December 31, 2005 by the
following pro forma amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per
|
|
|
|
share amounts)
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method, net of related
tax benefit
|
|
|
(1,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(129,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method, net of related
tax benefit
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(.43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method, net of related
tax benefit
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(.43
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R, we amortized
stock-based compensation cost for employees eligible to retire
over the three-year standard vesting period of the grants. Upon
adoption of SFAS 123R, we recognize costs on new option
grants to such retirement-eligible employees immediately upon
grant, consistent with the retirement vesting acceleration
provisions of these grants. If we had historically computed
stock-based compensation cost for these employees under this
accelerated method, $0.4 million or less than $.01 per
diluted share of after-tax compensation cost would have been
accelerated and cumulatively included in the pro forma expense
above for the year ended December 31, 2005. The tax benefit
associated with this additional compensation expense would have
been $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
4.
|
Alderwoods
Acquisition
|
On November 28, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding
common stock of Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) for $20.00
per share in cash, resulting in a purchase price of
approximately $1.2 billion, which includes the refinancing
of $357.7 million and the assumption of $2.2 million
of Alderwoods debt. Included in our results of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2006 are the results of
Alderwoods operations from the date of acquisition through
December 31, 2006.
The primary reasons for the merger and the principal factors
that contributed to the recognition of goodwill in this
acquisition were:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Alderwoods creates a stronger company with
the benefits of increased size and scale, enabling us to serve a
number of new, complementary areas;
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Alderwoods preneed backlog of deferred
revenues enhances our long-term stability; and
|
|
|
|
combining the two companies operations provides
significant synergies and related cost savings.
|
The allocation of the purchase price to specific assets and
liabilities was based upon the fair value of Alderwoods
assets and liabilities and from information obtained from the
accounting systems of Alderwoods. The
55
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fair value of assets and liabilities was determined using
various methodologies and assumptions including the direct cost
approach, expected sales proceeds of divested Alderwoods
locations, historical operating results and income and market
approaches. To the extent that information was not practicably
available to us at the closing date, but subsequently became
available during the allocation period, as defined in
SFAS 141, we adjusted goodwill, assets, or liabilities
associated with the acquisition. For more information on these
adjustments, see Note 9. The following table summarizes,
based on our final purchase price allocation, the fair values of
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Alderwoods
acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
54,679
|
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
190,299
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
723,983
|
|
Preneed funeral and cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
767,676
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
134,156
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
343,611
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
95,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
2,309,444
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
129,396
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
9,090
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery revenues and
non-controlling interest in trusts
|
|
|
781,710
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
159,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
1,079,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
1,229,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, land and certain identifiable intangible assets
recorded in the acquisition are not subject to amortization;
however, the goodwill and intangible assets are tested
periodically for impairment as required by SFAS 142. Of the
$95.0 million in goodwill recognized, $21.0 million
was allocated to our cemetery segment and $74.0 million was
allocated to our funeral segment. None of this goodwill is
deductible for tax purposes. The $134.2 million of
identified intangible assets acquired in the Alderwoods
acquisition consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful life
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Asset
|
Preneed customer relationships related to insurance claims
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
$
|
16,900
|
|
Referral relationships
|
|
|
10-20 years
|
|
|
|
16,400
|
|
Preneed deferred revenue
|
|
|
10-14 years
|
|
|
|
51,456
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Licenses and permits
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Water rights
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents information
as if the merger had occurred as of January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,358,644
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting change
|
|
|
15,505
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
22,450
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effects of
accounting change per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
.05
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.05
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
.08
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
.08
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Preneed
Funeral Activities
|
Preneed
Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments, net of allowance for cancellation,
represent trust investments, including investment earnings, and
customer receivables related to unperformed, price-guaranteed
preneed funeral contracts. When we, as the primary beneficiary,
receive payments from the customer, we deposit the amount
required by law into the trust and reclassify the corresponding
amount from Deferred preneed funeral revenues into
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts after the contract is
performed. We deposited $84.7 million, $77.7 million,
and $72.0 million into and withdrew $176.5 million,
$109.8 million, and $97.1 million from trusts during
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively. Cash flows from preneed funeral contracts are
presented as operating cash flows in our consolidated statement
of cash flows.
The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
1,244,181
|
|
|
$
|
1,329,922
|
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
225,905
|
|
|
|
230,183
|
|
Unearned finance charge
|
|
|
(5,961
|
)
|
|
|
(5,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,464,125
|
|
|
|
1,554,662
|
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(29,722
|
)
|
|
|
(37,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,434,403
|
|
|
$
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An allowance for contract cancellation is estimated based on
historical experience. Upon cancellation of a trust funded
preneed funeral contract, a customer is generally entitled to
receive a refund of the funds held in trust. In many
jurisdictions, we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the
amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust
including investment returns. Therefore, when realized or
unrealized losses of a trust result in preneed funeral contracts
being insufficient to meet contingent customer withdrawals, we
assess such contracts to determine
57
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
whether a loss provision should be recorded. No such loss
provisions were required to be recognized as of
December 31, 2007 or 2006.
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments are
reduced by the trust investment earnings (realized and
unrealized) that we have been allowed to withdraw in certain
states prior to maturity. These earnings are recorded in
Deferred preneed funeral revenues until the service is
performed or the merchandise is delivered.
The activity in Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Preneed funeral receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,192
|
|
|
$
|
1,267,784
|
|
Net preneed contract sales
|
|
|
146,250
|
|
|
|
121,287
|
|
|
|
132,157
|
|
Cash receipts from customers
|
|
|
(119,458
|
)
|
|
|
(110,438
|
)
|
|
|
(109,879
|
)
|
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
84,712
|
|
|
|
77,691
|
|
|
|
71,961
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of businesses, net
|
|
|
(73,502
|
)
|
|
|
256,138
|
|
|
|
(17,257
|
)
|
Net undistributed investment earnings
|
|
|
54,397
|
|
|
|
82,007
|
|
|
|
27,140
|
|
Maturities and distributed earnings
|
|
|
(184,579
|
)
|
|
|
(130,852
|
)
|
|
|
(131,651
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
8,816
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(10,714
|
)
|
Sale of debt associated with certain trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,800
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
(4,817
|
)
|
|
|
28,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed funeral receivables and trust
investments
|
|
$
|
1,434,403
|
|
|
$
|
1,516,676
|
|
|
$
|
1,226,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with funeral trust
investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are detailed
below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of
control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private
equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of
the underlying securities or cash held by the common trust
funds, mutual funds at published values, and the estimated
market value of private equity investments (including debt as
well as the estimated fair value related to the contract
holders equity in majority-owned real estate investments).
The fair market value of funeral trust investments, which in the
aggregate represented 100% and 103% of the related cost basis of
such investments as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, was based primarily on quoted market prices at
December 31, 2007 and 2006. We assess our trust investments
for
other-than-temporary
declines in fair value on a quarterly basis, primarily using
actively traded, published values, in accordance with
SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115). As a
result of our reviews during 2007, we recorded a
$3.6 million impairment charge for other-than-temporary
declines in fair value related to unrealized losses on certain
private equity and other investments. Such impairment charges
are recognized as investment losses and offset by interest
income related to non-controlling interest in funeral trust
investments in Other expense, net in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations. As a result of our most recent review
at December 31, 2007, we recorded no additional impairment
charges. The review at December 31, 2006 resulted in no
adjustments for unrealized losses related to certain private
equity and other investments. See Note 8 to the
consolidated financial statements for further information
related to non-controlling interest in funeral trust investments.
58
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
194,728
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,728
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
79,430
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
79,682
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
68,205
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
67,975
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
7,062
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
7,169
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
2,670
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
Insurance-backed
|
|
|
196,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,406
|
|
Asset-backed
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
378,628
|
|
|
|
12,415
|
|
|
|
(6,131
|
)
|
|
|
384,912
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
129,351
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
140,857
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)
|
|
|
142,250
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
49,854
|
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
(6,518
|
)
|
|
|
46,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,247,060
|
|
|
$
|
23,534
|
|
|
$
|
(17,598
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,252,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,244,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
235,178
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
235,178
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
72,280
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
(278
|
)
|
|
|
73,650
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
86,770
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
86,907
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
4,390
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
Insurance-backed
|
|
|
203,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,709
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
756
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
328,672
|
|
|
|
22,425
|
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
348,399
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
124,154
|
|
|
|
12,896
|
|
|
|
(539
|
)
|
|
|
136,511
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
212,302
|
|
|
|
8,561
|
|
|
|
(2,254
|
)
|
|
|
218,609
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
65,127
|
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
|
|
(783
|
)
|
|
|
65,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,338,140
|
|
|
$
|
47,761
|
|
|
$
|
(7,115
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,378,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,864
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,329,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2007 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2007 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
140,881
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
70,471
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
92,852
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
49,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
353,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have determined that unrealized losses in our funeral trust
investments at both December 31, 2007 and 2006 are
considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses were
due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity
prices. We believe that none of the securities are
other-than-temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the
investments as well as our discussions with trustees, money
managers and consultants. Our funeral
60
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
trust investment unrealized losses, their durations and the fair
market value as of December 31, 2007, are shown in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
9,712
|
|
|
$
|
(284
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,913
|
|
|
$
|
(94
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,625
|
|
|
$
|
(378
|
)
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
6,975
|
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
9,204
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
16,179
|
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
139,050
|
|
|
|
(4,439
|
)
|
|
|
45,594
|
|
|
|
(1,692
|
)
|
|
|
184,644
|
|
|
|
(6,131
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
47,543
|
|
|
|
(1,631
|
)
|
|
|
13,882
|
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
61,425
|
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
46,640
|
|
|
|
(1,153
|
)
|
|
|
15,940
|
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
62,580
|
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
27,234
|
|
|
|
(6,500
|
)
|
|
|
27,280
|
|
|
|
(6,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
253,001
|
|
|
$
|
(8,016
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,901
|
|
|
$
|
(9,582
|
)
|
|
$
|
368,902
|
|
|
$
|
(17,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, purchases and
sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$1,093.3 million and $901.6 million, respectively.
These sale transactions resulted in $106.4 million and
$29.9 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2007. During
the year ended December 31, 2006, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$646.7 million and $862.5 million, respectively. These
sale transactions resulted in $83.4 million and
$36.7 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively for the year ended December 31, 2006. During
the year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$835.0 million and $1,036.0 million, respectively.
These sale transactions resulted in $56.6 million and
$19.5 million of realized gains and losses, respectively,
for the year ended December 31, 2005. We use the first in,
first out (FIFO) method to determine the cost of funeral trust
available-for-sale
securities sold during the period.
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current
funeral revenues when the service is performed, merchandise is
delivered, or upon cancellation of the amount we are entitled to
retain. Recognized earnings (realized and unrealized) related to
these trust investments were $45.8 million,
$35.1 million, and $37.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
Deferred
Preneed Funeral Revenues
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, Deferred preneed funeral
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future funeral service revenues, including distributed trust
investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded
preneed funeral contracts that are not held in trust accounts.
Deferred preneed funeral revenues are recognized in
current funeral revenues when the service is performed or
merchandise is delivered. Future funeral service revenues and
net trust investment earnings that are held in trust accounts
are included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and
cemetery trusts.
61
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed funeral revenues for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Deferred preneed funeral revenues,
net
|
|
$
|
537,792
|
|
|
$
|
535,384
|
|
|
$
|
540,794
|
|
Net preneed contract sales
|
|
|
135,417
|
|
|
|
107,291
|
|
|
|
129,459
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of businesses, net
|
|
|
(120,290
|
)
|
|
|
25,758
|
|
|
|
(18,253
|
)
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
56,779
|
|
|
|
76,127
|
|
|
|
22,783
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed revenues
|
|
|
(173,126
|
)
|
|
|
(136,376
|
)
|
|
|
(157,861
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
6,499
|
|
|
|
(7,815
|
)
|
|
|
(5,539
|
)
|
Change in non-controlling interest
|
|
|
76,370
|
|
|
|
(52,512
|
)
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
|
|
(10,065
|
)
|
|
|
15,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Deferred preneed funeral revenues, net
|
|
$
|
526,668
|
|
|
$
|
537,792
|
|
|
$
|
535,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-Funded
Preneed Funeral Contracts
Not included in the consolidated balance sheet are
insurance-funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded
by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third party
insurers. The proceeds of the life insurance policies or annuity
contracts will be reflected in funeral revenues as these
funerals are performed by the Company.
|
|
6.
|
Preneed
Cemetery Activities
|
Preneed
Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, net
of allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments,
including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of
unearned finance charges, for contracts sold in advance of when
the property interment rights, merchandise, or services are
needed. When we, as the primary beneficiary, receive payments
from the customer, we deposit the amount required by law into
the trust, remove the corresponding amount from Deferred
preneed cemetery revenues, and record the amount into
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts when the contract is
performed. We deposited $115.7 million,
$117.5 million, and $114.3 million into and withdrew
$148.6 million, $88.7 million, and $128.2 million
from the trusts during the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005, respectively. Cash flows from preneed cemetery
contracts are presented as operating cash flows in our
consolidated statement of cash flows.
The components of Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments in the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market
|
|
$
|
1,158,516
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,446
|
|
Receivables from customers
|
|
|
351,409
|
|
|
|
384,428
|
|
Unearned finance charges
|
|
|
(47,527
|
)
|
|
|
(54,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,462,398
|
|
|
|
1,566,170
|
|
Allowance for cancellation
|
|
|
(34,341
|
)
|
|
|
(43,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,428,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The activity in Preneed cemetery receivables and trust
investments for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,399,778
|
|
Net sales including deferred and recognized revenue
|
|
|
499,965
|
|
|
|
324,713
|
|
|
|
334,615
|
|
Acquisitions (dispositions) of businesses, net
|
|
|
(105,428
|
)
|
|
|
155,224
|
|
|
|
(65,112
|
)
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
88,700
|
|
|
|
107,760
|
|
|
|
27,229
|
|
Cash receipts from customers, net of refunds
|
|
|
(521,475
|
)
|
|
|
(381,688
|
)
|
|
|
(368,234
|
)
|
Deposits to trust
|
|
|
115,651
|
|
|
|
117,518
|
|
|
|
114,303
|
|
Maturities, deliveries, and associated earnings
|
|
|
(148,627
|
)
|
|
|
(88,673
|
)
|
|
|
(128,196
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
Sale of debt associated with certain trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,367
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(32,437
|
)
|
|
|
(1,675
|
)
|
|
|
(2,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Preneed cemetery receivables and
trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,428,057
|
|
|
$
|
1,522,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,288,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with the cemetery
merchandise and service trust investments at December 31,
2007 and 2006 are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment
(net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds,
mutual funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value
represents the value of the underlying securities or cash held
by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and
the estimated market value of private equity investments
(including debt as well as the estimated fair value related to
the contract holders equity in majority-owned real estate
investments). The fair market value of cemetery trust
investments, which in the aggregate represented 102% and 106% of
the related cost basis of such investments as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, was based
primarily on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. We
assess our trust investments for
other-than-temporary
declines in fair value on a quarterly basis, primarily using
actively traded, published values, in accordance with
SFAS 115. As a result of our reviews during 2007, we
recorded a $3.2 million impairment charge for
other-than-temporary declines in fair value related to
unrealized losses on certain private equity and other
investments. Such impairment charges are recognized as
investment losses and offset by interest income related to
non-controlling interest in cemetery trust investments in
Other expense, net in our consolidated statements of
operations. As a result of our most recent review at
December 31, 2007, we recorded no additional impairment
charges. The review at December 31, 2006 resulted in no
adjustments for unrealized
63
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
losses related to certain private equity and other investments.
See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for
further information related to non-controlling interest in
cemetery trust investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
399,301
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
399,301
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
19,371
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
20,065
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
23,301
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
23,662
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
8,012
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
8,309
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
3,090
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
395,942
|
|
|
|
20,923
|
|
|
|
(4,823
|
)
|
|
|
412,042
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
182,214
|
|
|
|
12,905
|
|
|
|
(2,861
|
)
|
|
|
192,258
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
126,728
|
|
|
|
5,535
|
|
|
|
(1,185
|
)
|
|
|
131,078
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
32,210
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
(4,626
|
)
|
|
|
29,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,190,058
|
|
|
$
|
43,257
|
|
|
$
|
(13,823
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,219,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,158,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
258,365
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,365
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
61,785
|
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
|
|
(2,147
|
)
|
|
|
63,833
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
25,187
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
25,902
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
5,223
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
2,200
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
300,188
|
|
|
|
26,726
|
|
|
|
(1,756
|
)
|
|
|
325,158
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
208,396
|
|
|
|
28,309
|
|
|
|
(729
|
)
|
|
|
235,976
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
374,636
|
|
|
|
21,204
|
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
392,801
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
28,802
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
(4,153
|
)
|
|
|
25,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments
|
|
$
|
1,264,636
|
|
|
$
|
82,234
|
|
|
$
|
(11,898
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,334,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98,526
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2008 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2007 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
1,028
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
23,631
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
17,516
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have determined that unrealized losses in our cemetery trust
investments are considered temporary in nature, as the
unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest
rates and equity prices. We believe that none of the securities
are other-than-temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the
investments as well as our discussions with trustees, money
managers and consultants. Our cemetery trust investment
unrealized losses, their durations and their fair market value
as of December 31, 2007, are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
5,049
|
|
|
$
|
(166
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,883
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,932
|
|
|
$
|
(205
|
)
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
108,127
|
|
|
|
(4,026
|
)
|
|
|
38,552
|
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
|
146,679
|
|
|
|
(4,823
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
59,092
|
|
|
|
(2,238
|
)
|
|
|
13,975
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
73,067
|
|
|
|
(2,861
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
25,865
|
|
|
|
(837
|
)
|
|
|
15,907
|
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
41,772
|
|
|
|
(1,185
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
|
|
(4,626
|
)
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
|
|
(4,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
202,604
|
|
|
$
|
(7,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
92,502
|
|
|
$
|
(6,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
295,106
|
|
|
$
|
(13,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, purchases and
sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$1,067.2 million and $1,377.9 million, respectively.
These sale transactions resulted in $196.9 million and
$77.5 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2007. During
the year ended December 31, 2006, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$772.9 million and $990.1 million, respectively. These
sale transactions resulted in $100.3 million and
$47.3 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively for year ended December 31, 2006. During the
year ended December 31, 2005 purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities included in trust investments were
$916.0 million and $1.0 billion, respectively. These
transactions resulted in $67.7 million and
$21.5 million of realized gains and realized losses,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2005. We use
the FIFO method to determine the cost of cemetery trust
available-for-sale
securities sold during the period.
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in current
cemetery revenues when the service is performed or the
merchandise is delivered or upon cancellation of the amount we
are entitled to retain. Recognized earnings
65
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(realized and unrealized) related to these trust investments
were $25.9 million, $15.0 million, and
$13.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005, respectively.
Deferred
Preneed Cemetery Revenues
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, Deferred preneed cemetery
revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent
future cemetery revenues, including distributed trust investment
earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed
cemetery contracts that are not held in trust accounts.
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues are recognized in
current cemetery revenues when the service is performed or
merchandise delivered. Future cemetery revenues and net trust
investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included
in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery
trusts.
The following table summarizes the activity in Deferred
preneed cemetery revenues for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
754,193
|
|
|
$
|
792,485
|
|
|
$
|
803,144
|
|
Net preneed and atneed deferred sales
|
|
|
374,412
|
|
|
|
311,077
|
|
|
|
308,202
|
|
Dispositions of businesses, net
|
|
|
(20,321
|
)
|
|
|
(12,073
|
)
|
|
|
(68,378
|
)
|
Net investment earnings
|
|
|
91,601
|
|
|
|
103,587
|
|
|
|
27,260
|
|
Recognized deferred preneed revenues
|
|
|
(405,891
|
)
|
|
|
(320,076
|
)
|
|
|
(315,663
|
)
|
Change in cancellation allowance
|
|
|
3,233
|
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
Change in non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(21,347
|
)
|
|
|
(129,180
|
)
|
|
|
27,889
|
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
(22,004
|
)
|
|
|
5,662
|
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
$
|
753,876
|
|
|
$
|
754,193
|
|
|
$
|
792,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Cemetery
Perpetual Care Trusts
|
We are required by state or provincial law to pay into perpetual
care trusts a portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery
property interment rights. As the primary beneficiary of the
trusts, we consolidate the perpetual care trust investments with
a corresponding amount recorded as Non-controlling interest
in perpetual care trusts. We deposited $26.3 million,
$22.5 million, and $21.3 million into trusts and
withdrew $26.4 million, $43.3 million, and
$28.1 million from trusts during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Cash flows
from cemetery perpetual care contracts are presented as
operating cash flows in our consolidated statement of cash flows.
The cost and market values associated with trust investments
held in perpetual care trusts at December 31, 2007 and 2006
are detailed below. Cost reflects the investment (net of
redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual
funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value
represents the value of the underlying securities or cash held
by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and
the estimated market value of private equity investments
(including debt as well as the estimated fair value related to
the contract holders equity in majority-owned real estate
investments). The fair market value of perpetual care trusts,
which in the aggregate represented 100% and 105% of the related
cost basis of such investments as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively, was based primarily on quoted market prices
at the balance sheet date. We assess our trust investments for
other-than-temporary
declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. As a result of our
reviews during 2007, we recorded a $1.2 million impairment
charge for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related
to unrealized losses on certain private equity and other
investments. Such impairment charges are recognized as
investment losses and offset by interest income related to
non-controlling interest in perpetual care trust investments in
Other (expense) income, net in our consolidated
statements of operations. As a result of our most recent review
at
66
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, we recorded no additional impairment
charges. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial
statements for further information related to non-controlling
interest in perpetual care trust investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
88,516
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
88,516
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3,349
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
25,065
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
25,841
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
42,437
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
42,107
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
128,815
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
(2,840
|
)
|
|
|
129,476
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
44,221
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
|
44,426
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
555,509
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
(10,714
|
)
|
|
|
548,051
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
34,894
|
|
|
|
3,145
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
37,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$
|
924,855
|
|
|
$
|
12,847
|
|
|
$
|
(15,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
921,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
905,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
167,464
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
167,464
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
11,557
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
28,738
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
29,589
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
24,067
|
|
|
|
1,255
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
25,309
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
633
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
8,487
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
86,945
|
|
|
|
8,806
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
95,636
|
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
61,498
|
|
|
|
5,077
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
66,363
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
481,267
|
|
|
|
24,048
|
|
|
|
(1,431
|
)
|
|
|
503,884
|
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
36,948
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
38,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual care trust investments
|
|
$
|
907,054
|
|
|
$
|
43,798
|
|
|
$
|
(2,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
948,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,229
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
893,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have determined that unrealized losses in our perpetual care
trust investments are considered temporary in nature, as the
unrealized losses were due to temporary fluctuations in interest
rates and equity prices. We believe that none of the securities
are other-than-temporarily impaired based on an analysis of the
investments as well as our
68
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
discussions with trustees, money managers and consultants. Our
perpetual care trust investment unrealized losses, their
durations and fair market values as of December 31, 2007,
are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed income securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign government
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
12,237
|
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
|
|
10,347
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
22,584
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
39,947
|
|
|
|
(1,776
|
)
|
|
|
46,233
|
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
|
|
86,180
|
|
|
|
(2,840
|
)
|
Mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
12,250
|
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
14,551
|
|
|
|
(447
|
)
|
|
|
26,801
|
|
|
|
(1,003
|
)
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
163,313
|
|
|
|
(5,896
|
)
|
|
|
203,975
|
|
|
|
(4,818
|
)
|
|
|
367,288
|
|
|
|
(10,714
|
)
|
Private equity and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,652
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
12,652
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
229,596
|
|
|
$
|
(8,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
288,685
|
|
|
$
|
(7,131
|
)
|
|
$
|
518,281
|
|
|
$
|
(15,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity dates of the fixed income securities range from 2008 to
2038. Maturities of fixed income securities at December 31,
2007 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
2,529
|
|
Due in one to five years
|
|
|
35,227
|
|
Due in five to ten years
|
|
|
16,817
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
17,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2007, purchases and
sales of
available-for-sale
securities in the perpetual care trust were $727.7 million
and $470.7 million, respectively. These sale transactions
resulted in $45.2 million and $15.3 million of
realized gains and realized losses, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2006, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities in the perpetual care trusts were $915.9 million
and $1.1 billion, respectively. These sales transactions
resulted in $40.9 million and $26.7 million of
realized gains and realized losses, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2005, purchases and sales of
available-for-sale
securities in the perpetual care trusts were $920.0 million
and $970.3 million, respectively. These sales transactions
resulted in $19.1 million and $9.7 million of realized
gains and losses, respectively. We use the FIFO method to
determine the cost of perpetual care trusts
available-for-sale
securities sold during the period.
Distributable earnings from these perpetual care trust
investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues to the
extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized
earnings related to these perpetual care trust investments were
$44.9 million, $42.1 million, and $26.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively.
69
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Non-Controlling
Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts and in Perpetual Care
Trusts
|
Non-Controlling
Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts
We consolidate in our balance sheet the merchandise and service
trusts associated with our preneed funeral and cemetery
activities in accordance with FIN 46R. Although
FIN 46R requires the consolidation of the merchandise and
service trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among
the trusts, us or our customers. The customers are the legal
beneficiaries of these merchandise and service trusts, and
therefore their interests in these trusts represent a
non-controlling interest in subsidiaries.
Non-Controlling
Interest in Perpetual Care Trusts
The Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
reflected in the consolidated balance sheet represents the
cemetery perpetual care trusts, net of the accrued expenses and
other long-term liabilities of the perpetual care trusts.
The components of Non-controlling interest in funeral and
cemetery trusts and Non-controlling interest in perpetual
care trusts in our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Perpetual Care
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market value
|
|
$
|
1,244,181
|
|
|
$
|
1,158,516
|
|
|
$
|
2,402,697
|
|
|
$
|
905,744
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
(3,737
|
)
|
|
|
(8,672
|
)
|
|
|
(12,409
|
)
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
$
|
1,240,444
|
|
|
$
|
1,149,844
|
|
|
$
|
2,390,288
|
|
|
$
|
906,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
Preneed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Perpetual Care
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trust investments, at market value
|
|
$
|
1,329,922
|
|
|
$
|
1,236,446
|
|
|
$
|
2,566,368
|
|
|
$
|
893,931
|
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred taxes and other
|
|
|
(6,052
|
)
|
|
|
(11,573
|
)
|
|
|
(17,625
|
)
|
|
|
(6,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
$
|
1,323,870
|
|
|
$
|
1,224,873
|
|
|
$
|
2,548,743
|
|
|
$
|
887,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Expense, Net
The components of Other expense, net in our consolidated
statement of operations for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005 are detailed below. See Notes 5
through 7 to the consolidated financial statements for further
discussion of the amounts related to the funeral, cemetery and
perpetual care trusts.
70
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
106,394
|
|
|
$
|
196,880
|
|
|
$
|
45,203
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
348,477
|
|
Realized losses and impairment charges
|
|
|
(33,507
|
)
|
|
|
(80,732
|
)
|
|
|
(16,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,744
|
)
|
Interest, dividend and other ordinary income
|
|
|
26,791
|
|
|
|
41,218
|
|
|
|
40,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,722
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(10,534
|
)
|
|
|
(17,264
|
)
|
|
|
(4,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
89,144
|
|
|
|
140,102
|
|
|
|
64,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,013
|
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trust investments
|
|
|
(89,144
|
)
|
|
|
(140,102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,246
|
)
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
83,350
|
|
|
$
|
100,326
|
|
|
$
|
40,934
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
224,610
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(36,653
|
)
|
|
|
(47,256
|
)
|
|
|
(26,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,584
|
)
|
Interest, dividend and other ordinary income
|
|
|
22,614
|
|
|
|
36,337
|
|
|
|
30,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,832
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(8,492
|
)
|
|
|
(12,989
|
)
|
|
|
(2,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
60,819
|
|
|
|
76,418
|
|
|
|
42,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,229
|
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trust investments
|
|
|
(60,819
|
)
|
|
|
(76,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137,237
|
)
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Cemetery Perpetual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Care Trusts
|
|
|
Other, Net(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Realized gains
|
|
$
|
56,560
|
|
|
$
|
67,732
|
|
|
$
|
19,088
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,380
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(19,503
|
)
|
|
|
(21,506
|
)
|
|
|
(9,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,727
|
)
|
Interest, dividend and other ordinary income
|
|
|
19,894
|
|
|
|
23,458
|
|
|
|
29,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,351
|
|
Trust expenses and income taxes
|
|
|
(11,924
|
)
|
|
|
(13,419
|
)
|
|
|
(8,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income
|
|
|
45,027
|
|
|
|
56,265
|
|
|
|
30,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,011
|
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in funeral
and cemetery trust investments
|
|
|
(45,027
|
)
|
|
|
(56,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,292
|
)
|
Interest expense related to non-controlling interest in
perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts included within Other expense, net primarily
relate to foreign currency gains and losses and surety bonding
expenses. |
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for our funeral
and cemetery segments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
1,123,888
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,123,888
|
|
Increase in goodwill related to acquisitions
|
|
|
165,308
|
|
|
|
22,606
|
|
|
|
187,914
|
|
Reduction of goodwill related to dispositions
|
|
|
(48,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,605
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,241,666
|
|
|
|
22,606
|
|
|
|
1,264,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction in goodwill related to the Alderwoods acquisition
|
|
|
(86,437
|
)
|
|
|
(1,561
|
)
|
|
|
(87,998
|
)
|
Increase in goodwill related to other acquisitions
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
6,432
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
Reduction of goodwill related to dispositions
|
|
|
(27,045
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(27,224
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency and other
|
|
|
41,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,170,855
|
|
|
$
|
27,298
|
|
|
$
|
1,198,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During 2007, we adjusted our goodwill for various purchase price
allocation adjustments as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to fair value of deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
(2,681
|
)
|
Adjustments to fair value of intangible assets
|
|
|
35,158
|
|
Adjustments to fair value of trust assets
|
|
|
26,906
|
|
Adjustments to fair value of acquired locations
|
|
|
(49,469
|
)
|
Adjustments to deferred taxes
|
|
|
(93,656
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(4,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustment to Alderwoods goodwill
|
|
$
|
(87,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2007, we finalized our assessment of the fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in our Alderwoods
acquisition. Accordingly, we reflected the final impact of the
assessment on goodwill and deferred federal income taxes,
including the impact of the adoption of FIN 48 as explained
in Note 10. Additionally, we recorded adjustments to our
acquired Alderwoods goodwill related to our verification of the
contract status and fair values of preneed cemetery and funeral
deferred revenues and related trust and intangible assets. We
also adjusted the fair values of certain assets and liabilities
sold during 2007 in relation to certain Alderwoods locations
mandated for divestment pursuant to our recent FTC decree.
The provision or benefit for income taxes includes
U.S. federal income taxes, determined on a consolidated
return basis, foreign and state income taxes.
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effects of accounting changes for the years ended
December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
369,730
|
|
|
$
|
85,928
|
|
|
$
|
71,311
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
17,257
|
|
|
|
11,521
|
|
|
|
15,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
386,987
|
|
|
$
|
97,449
|
|
|
$
|
87,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
84,405
|
|
|
$
|
2,522
|
|
|
$
|
2,328
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
|
|
8,236
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
State
|
|
|
16,317
|
|
|
|
(4,170
|
)
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current income taxes
|
|
|
109,018
|
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
7,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
16,058
|
|
|
$
|
33,114
|
|
|
$
|
38,128
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(1,982
|
)
|
|
|
5,704
|
|
State
|
|
|
18,804
|
|
|
|
7,125
|
|
|
|
(18,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred income taxes
|
|
|
34,652
|
|
|
|
38,257
|
|
|
|
24,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes
|
|
$
|
143,670
|
|
|
$
|
44,845
|
|
|
$
|
32,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory income
tax rate and our effective tax rate for the years ended December
31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Computed tax provision at the applicable federal statutory
income tax rate
|
|
$
|
135,446
|
|
|
$
|
34,108
|
|
|
$
|
30,494
|
|
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefits
|
|
|
22,829
|
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
(10,081
|
)
|
Dividends received deduction and tax exempt interest
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Foreign jurisdiction differences
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,343
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Write down of assets and other losses with no tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Permanent differences associated with dispositions
|
|
|
14,611
|
|
|
|
9,508
|
|
|
|
11,799
|
|
Tax benefit associated with uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
(29,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,873
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(496
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
143,670
|
|
|
$
|
44,845
|
|
|
$
|
32,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total effective tax rate
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
|
36.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2007 we generated taxable capital
gains on the sale of our investment in our French unconsolidated
subsidiary (See Note 20) which allowed us to recognize the
benefit of capital loss carryforwards that we had previously
concluded were more likely than not to expire unutilized because
of uncertainty with respect to the timing of the deduction. That
benefit decreased our 2007 effective tax rate by nine percentage
points. Our 2007, 2006, and 2005 effective tax rates were
negatively impacted by permanent differences between the book
and tax bases of North American asset dispositions and the 2005
tax rate was partially offset by state net operating loss
benefits.
75
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred taxes are determined based on differences between the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and
are measured using the enacted tax rates. The tax effects of
temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to
significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities as
of December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Inventories and cemetery property, principally due to purchase
accounting adjustments
|
|
$
|
(325,051
|
)
|
|
$
|
(353,797
|
)
|
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in
depreciation methods and purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(72,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(46,992
|
)
|
|
|
(14,016
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,120
|
)
|
Receivables, principally due to sales of cemetery interment
rights and related products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128,247
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
(176,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(444,883
|
)
|
|
|
(718,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts,
principally due to earnings from trust funds
|
|
|
141,767
|
|
|
|
258,692
|
|
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in
depreciation methods and purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,461
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, principally due to sales of cemetery interment
rights and related products
|
|
|
30,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
271,581
|
|
|
|
273,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
445,911
|
|
|
|
(607,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(68,469
|
)
|
|
|
(70,547
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
(67,441
|
)
|
|
$
|
(181,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, prior to the adoption of FIN 48,
we previously disclosed multi-jurisdictional long-term tax
liabilities of $104.9 million in the Other line of
the Deferred tax liabilities section above. See below for
a discussion of FIN 48 which changed the application of how
we valued and disclosed these liabilities.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, U.S. income taxes had not
been provided on $121.8 million and $71.9 million,
respectively, of the remaining undistributed earnings of our
Canadian subsidiaries. We intend to permanently reinvest these
undistributed foreign earnings in those businesses outside the
United States. It is not practicable to determine the amount of
federal income taxes, if any, that might become due if such
earnings are repatriated.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the
accounting for uncertain income tax positions recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This
interpretation requires companies to use a prescribed model for
assessing the financial statement recognition and measurement of
all tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax
returns. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition.
76
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross
unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2007 to
December 31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal, State and
|
|
|
|
Foreign Tax
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
198,773
|
|
Additions to tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
803
|
|
Reductions to tax positions related to prior years
|
|
|
(45,115
|
)
|
Reductions to tax positions related to acquired entities in
prior years, offset to goodwill
|
|
|
(774
|
)
|
Statute expirations
|
|
|
(5,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
147,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would
affect our effective tax rate was $41.9 million as of
December 31, 2007.
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. As a result of the initial adoption of FIN 48, we
recognized a $12.0 million net increase in our liability
for unrecognized tax benefits, which was recorded as a
$24.0 million increase to goodwill (related to uncertain
tax positions acquired in the recent Alderwoods transaction) and
a $12.0 million decrease in our Accumulated deficit
as of January 1, 2007. As of the date of the initial
adoption and after considering the impact of recognizing the net
liability increase noted above, our unrecognized tax benefits
totaled $257.1 million, of which $156.3 million would
impact our effective tax rate, if recognized.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, we identified certain
computational errors in our initial FIN 48 adoption impact
related to both unrecognized tax benefits and the potential
accrued interest associated with such unrecognized tax benefits
at the time of adoption. The net effect of these computational
errors, including an $11.1 million adjustment for interest,
was recorded as a $17.9 million decrease in our liability
for unrecognized tax benefits during the fourth quarter of 2007.
As revised for this immaterial correction of an error, our
FIN 48 adoption resulted in our recording a
$5.9 million reduction in our liability for unrecognized
tax benefits, of which $24.0 million was recorded as an
increase to goodwill and $29.9 million was recorded as a
decrease in our Accumulated deficit as of January 1,
2007. As of the date of adoption and after considering the
impact of recognizing the immaterial correction of an error
noted above, our unrecognized tax benefits totalled
$198.8 million, of which $80.0 million would impact
our effective tax rate, if recognized.
Consistent with our historical financial reporting, we include
potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized
tax benefits within our income tax provision account. We have
accrued $22.6 million and $29.8 million for the
payment of interest, net of tax benefits, and penalties as
January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007 respectively. To
the extent interest and penalties are not assessed with respect
to uncertain tax positions or the uncertainty of deductions in
the future, amounts accrued will be reduced and reflected as a
reduction of the overall income tax provision.
During the fourth quarter of 2007 we generated taxable capital
gains from the sale of our investment in our French operations
which allowed us to recognize the benefit of capital loss
carryforwards that we had previously concluded were more likely
than not to expire unutilized. The reduction to the tax
associated with prior years of $45.1 million primarily
relates to the recognition of capital loss carryforward amounts.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we recorded a net decrease in our
liability for uncertain tax positions of approximately
$5.8 million relating to uncertain positions taken in prior
years, as a result of expiring federal, state, and foreign
statute of limitations.
We file income tax returns, including tax returns for our
subsidiaries, with federal, state, local, and foreign
jurisdictions. Our tax returns are subject to routine compliance
review by the taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in
77
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
which we file tax returns in the ordinary course of business. We
consider the United States to be our most significant tax
jurisdiction; however, the taxing authorities in France and
Spain are auditing various tax returns. Current audits are
occurring in the United States and various state and foreign
locations covering open tax years through 2006. The Internal
Revenue Service has recently completed its field of work for tax
years 1999 through 2002 and is currently auditing tax years 2003
through 2005. It is reasonably possible that changes to our
global unrecognized tax benefits could be significant, however
due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of completion of
audits and possible outcomes, a current estimate of the range of
increases or decreases that may occur within the next twelve
months cannot be made.
Various subsidiaries have foreign, federal and state
carryforwards of $2.2 billion with expiration dates through
2025.
The loss carryforwards will expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
$
|
11,561
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,045
|
|
2009
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
30,534
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
31,545
|
|
2010
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
16,898
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
17,929
|
|
2011
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
68,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,153
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
377,093
|
|
|
|
1,656,901
|
|
|
|
47,687
|
|
|
|
2,081,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
379,517
|
|
|
$
|
1,784,658
|
|
|
$
|
48,178
|
|
|
$
|
2,212,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that some uncertainty exists with respect to future
realization of certain loss carryforwards, therefore a valuation
allowance has been established for those carryforwards where
uncertainty exists. The valuation allowance is primarily
attributable to state net operating losses and is due to
complexities of the various state laws restricting state net
operating loss utilization. The 2007 decrease in valuation
allowance is due to a $7.3 million decrease in valuation
allowance on state operating losses and an offsetting increase
of $5.2 million increase in valuation allowances on tax
losses in foreign jurisdictions. At December 31, 2007, the
loss and credit carryforward tax assets and associated valuation
allowances by jurisdiction are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Loss and tax credit carryforwards
|
|
$
|
132,861
|
|
|
$
|
115,881
|
|
|
$
|
22,839
|
|
|
$
|
271,581
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
2,617
|
|
|
$
|
50,109
|
|
|
$
|
15,743
|
|
|
$
|
68,469
|
|
78
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Debt as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
6.875% notes due October 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,497
|
|
6.5% notes due March 2008
|
|
|
45,209
|
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
7.7% notes due April 2009
|
|
|
28,731
|
|
|
|
202,588
|
|
7.875% debentures due February 2013
|
|
|
55,627
|
|
|
|
55,627
|
|
7.375% senior notes due October 2014
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
6.75% notes due April 2015
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75% notes due April 2016
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
7.0% notes due June 2017
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
7.625% senior notes due October 2018
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
7.5% notes due April 2027
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan due 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Series A and Series B senior notes due November 2011
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest
rates at 5.00%, conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share
|
|
|
4,175
|
|
|
|
9,925
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
112,507
|
|
|
|
113,484
|
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
|
|
|
15,742
|
|
|
|
26,304
|
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and other
|
|
|
(5,291
|
)
|
|
|
(7,553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,856,700
|
|
|
|
1,958,872
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
(36,594
|
)
|
|
|
(46,176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,820,106
|
|
|
$
|
1,912,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt at December 31, 2007 were
comprised primarily of convertible debentures and capital
leases. Our 6.5% notes due March 2008 are classified as
long-term as we intend to refinance these notes through a
drawdown on our revolving credit agreement. Our consolidated
debt had a weighted average interest rate of 7.09% and 7.30% at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Approximately 89%
and 82% of our total debt had a fixed interest rate at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The aggregate maturities of our debt for the five years
subsequent to December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
36,594
|
|
2009
|
|
|
49,643
|
|
2010
|
|
|
41,756
|
|
2011
|
|
|
204,741
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,465
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,519,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,856,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Bank
Credit Facility
We entered into a five-year $450 million bank credit
facility in November 2006 with a syndicate of financial
institutions, comprised of a $300 million revolving credit
facility and a $150 million term loan facility, including a
sublimit of $175 million for letters of credit. The term
loan was funded under the credit facility. We repaid
$50 million of the term loan in December 2006 and the
remaining $100 million in the first quarter of 2007. The
$300 million revolving credit facility remains unfunded.
The bank credit facility matures in November 2011. As of
December 31, 2007, we have used the facility to support
$54.3 million of letters of credit. The credit facility
provides us with flexibility for working capital, if needed, and
is guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries. The subsidiary
guaranty is a guaranty of payment of the outstanding amount of
the total lending commitment. It covers the term of the credit
facility, including extensions, and totaled a maximum potential
amount of $54.3 million at December 31, 2007. The
credit facility contains certain financial covenants, including
a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio,
maximum capital expenditure limitations, and certain cash
distribution and share repurchase restrictions. As of
December 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all of our
debt covenants. We also pay a quarterly fee on the unused
commitment, which ranges from 0.25% to 0.50%.
Debt
Issuances and Additions
In April 2007, we completed a private offering of
$400.0 million aggregate principal unsecured senior notes,
consisting of $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of
6.75% Senior Notes due 2015 and $200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Notes due 2027.
We are entitled to redeem the notes at any time by paying a
make-whole premium. The notes are subject to the provisions of
our Senior Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993, as
amended, which includes covenants limiting, among other things,
the creation of liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback
transactions. As of December 31, 2007, we were in
compliance with all such debt covenants. We used the net
proceeds from the offering to fund the closing of the tender
offers for our 6.50% Notes due 2008 and 7.70% Notes
due 2009 as further discussed below and for general corporate
purposes. Under the terms of the registration rights agreement
entered into in connection with the offerings of the notes, we
filed a registration statement with the SEC with respect to an
offer to exchange the notes for registered notes with
substantially identical terms. The registration statement was
declared effective by the SEC and the offering to exchange was
completed in the third quarter of 2007.
On November 28, 2006, in connection with the closing of the
Alderwoods acquisition, SCI issued $200.0 million of
privately placed debt securities, consisting of
$50.0 million of Floating Rate Series A Senior Notes
due October 2011 and $150.0 million of Floating Rate
Series B Notes due October 2011. Interest on these
privately placed debt securities will accrue at the rate of
3-month
LIBOR plus 2.0% (7.05% at December 31, 2007) and will
be payable quarterly in arrears.
On October 3, 2006, we completed a private offering of
$500.0 million aggregate principal unsecured senior notes,
consisting of $250.0 million aggregate principal of
7.375% Senior Notes due 2014 and $250.0 million
aggregate principal of 7.625% Senior Notes due 2018. We are
entitled to redeem the notes at any time by paying a make-whole
premium. The notes are subject to the provisions of our Senior
Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993, as amended, which
includes certain covenants limiting, among other things, the
creation of liens securing indebtedness and sale-leaseback
transactions. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we completed
the required registration statement and exchanged publicly held
registered notes for the unregistered notes.
Debt
Extinguishments and Reductions
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we repaid $13.5 million
aggregate principal amount of our 6.875% notes due October
2007. In addition to this repayment, we also prepaid
$50 million of our Series A Senior Notes due November
2011. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a loss of
$0.5 million recorded in Loss on early
80
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
extinguishment of debt in our condensed consolidated
statement of operations, which represents the write-off of
unamortized deferred loan costs of $0.5 million.
In the second quarter of 2007, we purchased $149.8 million
aggregate principal amount of our 6.50% Notes due 2008 and
$173.8 million aggregate principal amount of our
7.70% Notes due 2009 in a tender offer. In connection with
the repurchase of the notes, we recognized a Loss on early
extinguishment of debt of approximately $12.1 million,
which represents the write-off of unamortized deferred loan
costs of $1.1 million, a $1.0 million loss on a
related interest rate hedge, and $10.0 million in premiums
paid to extinguish the debt.
In the first quarter of 2007, we repaid $100.0 million
aggregate principal amount of our term loan. As a result of this
transaction, we recognized a loss of $2.4 million recorded
in Loss on early extinguishment of debt in our
consolidated statement of operations, which represents the
write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of
$1.7 million and a $0.7 million premium to early
extinguish the debt.
In the fourth quarter of 2006, we purchased $139.0 million
aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 7.70% notes
due 2009 in a tender offer. As a result of this transaction, we
recognized a loss of $17.5 million recorded in Loss on
early extinguishment of debt, in our consolidated statement
of operations. Also in the fourth quarter of 2006, we redeemed
$11.3 million aggregate principal amount of our debentures
associated with the acquisitions of various locations. These
transactions resulted in no recognized gain or loss.
During the second quarter of 2006, our 7.2% notes matured,
and we made a payment consisting of $10.7 million in
principal and $0.4 million in interest to the debtholders
and redeemed $1.0 million aggregate principal amount of our
debentures associated with the acquisition of various locations.
These transactions resulted in no recognized gain or loss.
On December 15, 2005, as required by the terms of the
agreement, we repaid the remaining $63.5 million of the
6.00% notes due 2005.
Capital
Leases
In 2007, we acquired $31.7 million of transportation
equipment using capital leases.
In 2006, we acquired $126.4 million of transportation
equipment using capital leases, of which $102.3 million was
classified as operating leases in prior periods. See additional
information regarding these leases in Note 13 of these
consolidated financial statements.
Additional
Debt Disclosures
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, we had deposited
$23.7 million and $10.1 million, respectively, in
restricted, interest-bearing accounts that were pledged as
collateral for various credit instruments and commercial
commitments. This restricted cash is included in Deferred
charges and other assets in our consolidated balance sheet.
Unamortized pricing discounts, totaling $5.3 million and
$4.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, primarily relate to our September 2002 exchange
offering of the 7.7% notes due in 2009.
We had assets of approximately $4.8 million and
$6.9 million pledged as collateral for the mortgage notes
and other debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Cash interest payments for the three years ended December 31
were, in thousands, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
140,298
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
104,789
|
|
2005
|
|
$
|
95,678
|
|
Cash interest payments in 2006 include $6.4 million of
bridge financing costs related to the Alderwoods acquisition.
81
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash interest payments forecasted as of December 31, 2007
for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2007 are, in
thousands, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
131,070
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
128,017
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
125,995
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
123,225
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
110,083
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
$
|
570,100
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Credit
Risk and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
Fair
Value Estimates
The fair value estimates of the following financial instruments
have been determined using available market information and
appropriate valuation methodologies. The carrying values of cash
and cash equivalents, trade receivables, and trade payables
approximate the fair values of those instruments due to the
short-term nature of the instruments. The fair values of
receivables on preneed funeral contracts and cemetery contracts
are impracticable to estimate because of the lack of a trading
market and the diverse number of individual contracts with
varying terms. The carrying value of other notes receivable
approximates the fair value. At December 31, 2007 and 2006,
notes receivable included in Receivables, net totaled
$4.8 million and $6.1 million, respectively, and
long-term notes receivable included in Deferred charges and
other assets in the consolidated balance sheet totaled
$25.2 million and $28.0 million, respectively.
The fair value of our debt at December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
6.875% notes due 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,571
|
|
6.5% notes due 2008
|
|
|
45,209
|
|
|
|
195,975
|
|
7.7% notes due 2009
|
|
|
28,444
|
|
|
|
210,185
|
|
7.875% debentures due 2013
|
|
|
55,071
|
|
|
|
58,408
|
|
7.375% senior notes due 2014
|
|
|
253,750
|
|
|
|
260,625
|
|
6.75% notes due 2015
|
|
|
196,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.75% notes due 2016
|
|
|
239,375
|
|
|
|
248,438
|
|
7.0% notes due 2017
|
|
|
288,750
|
|
|
|
302,625
|
|
7.625% senior notes due 2018
|
|
|
251,250
|
|
|
|
263,125
|
|
7.5% notes due 2027
|
|
|
185,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Floating rate series A and series B senior notes
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
112,507
|
|
|
|
113,484
|
|
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest
rates at 5.00%, conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share
|
|
|
4,175
|
|
|
|
9,925
|
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050
|
|
|
15,742
|
|
|
|
26,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of debt
|
|
$
|
1,825,773
|
|
|
$
|
2,002,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair values of our long-term, fixed rate and convertible
debt securities were estimated using market prices for those
securities or for other securities having similar terms and
maturities. Mortgage notes and other debt have been reported at
face value because of the diverse terms and conditions and
non-marketable nature of these notes.
Credit
Risk Exposure
Our cash deposits, some of which exceed insured limits, are
distributed among various market and national banks in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, we regularly
invest excess cash in financial instruments which are not
insured, such as money-market funds and Eurodollar time
deposits, that are offered by a variety of reputable financial
institutions and commercial paper that is offered by
corporations with quality credit ratings. We believe that the
credit risk associated with such instruments is minimal.
We grant credit to customers in the normal course of business.
The credit risk associated with funeral, cemetery, and preneed
funeral and preneed cemetery receivables due from customers is
generally considered minimal because of the diversification of
the customers served. Furthermore, bad debts have not been
significant relative to the volume of deferred revenues.
Customer payments on preneed funeral or preneed cemetery
contracts that are either placed into state regulated trusts or
used to pay premiums on life insurance contracts generally do
not subject us to collection risk. Insurance funded contracts
are subject to supervision by state insurance departments and
are protected in the majority of states by insurance guaranty
acts.
|
|
13.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases
Our leases principally relate to funeral home facilities and
transportation equipment. The majority of our lease arrangements
contain options to (i) purchase the property at fair value
on the exercise date, (ii) purchase the property for a
value determined at the inception of the leases, or
(iii) renew for the fair rental value at the end of the
primary lease term. Rental expense for these leases was
$30.1 million, $24.5 million, and $54.2 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005,
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, future minimum lease
payments for non-cancelable operating and capital leases
exceeding one year are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
11,267
|
|
|
$
|
30,024
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,040
|
|
|
|
25,116
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8,319
|
|
|
|
45,272
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,806
|
|
|
|
10,552
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,247
|
|
|
|
6,996
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
55,522
|
|
|
|
27,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
98,201
|
|
|
$
|
145,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payable on capital leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management,
Consulting and Non-Competition Agreements
We have entered into management, employment, consulting and
non-competition agreements, generally for five to ten years,
with certain officers and employees and former owners of
businesses that we acquired. At
83
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
December 31, 2007, the maximum estimated future cash
commitment under agreements with remaining commitment terms was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
|
|
|
Consulting
|
|
|
Non-Competition
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,389
|
|
|
$
|
1,479
|
|
|
$
|
5,022
|
|
|
$
|
7,890
|
|
2009
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
3,698
|
|
2010
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
1,874
|
|
2011
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
2012
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
2013 and thereafter
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,283
|
|
|
$
|
3,684
|
|
|
$
|
11,012
|
|
|
$
|
16,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Representations
and Warranties
As of December 31, 2007, we have contingent obligations of
$33.5 million (of which $27.5 million is reflected in
our financial statements as a liability) resulting from our
previous international asset sales and joint venture
transactions. In some cases, we have agreed to guarantee certain
representations and warranties made in such disposition
transactions with letters of credit or interest-bearing cash
investments. We have interest-bearing cash investments of
$23.0 million included in Deferred charges and other
assets collateralizing certain of these contingent
obligations. We believe it is remote that it will ultimately be
required to fund to third parties claims against these
representations and warranties above the carrying value of the
liability.
In March 2004, we disposed of our funeral operations in France
to a newly formed, third party company. As a result of this
sale, we recognized $35.8 million of contractual
obligations related to representations, warranties, and other
indemnifications in accordance with the provisions of
FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. During 2007, we paid
$0.2 million to settle certain tax and litigation matters.
The remaining obligation of $23.5 million at
December 31, 2007 represents the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Potential
|
|
|
Value as of
|
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Future
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Obligation
|
|
|
Time Limit
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Tax reserve liability
|
|
$
|
18,610
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
30 million
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Litigation provision
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
Until entire resolution of
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) the relevant claims or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) settlement of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
claim by the purchaser at the request
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the vendor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee litigation provision
|
|
|
6,512
|
|
|
One month after expiration of
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
6,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the statutory period of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAT taxes
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
One month after expiration of
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the statutory period of limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
|
Until entire resolution of (i) the relevant claims or
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
3,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) settlement of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
claim by the purchaser at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the request of the vendor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Deductible of majority equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
owner
|
|
|
(4,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is
20.0 million or $29.4 million at
December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is
40.0 million or $58.8 million at
December 31, 2007. |
84
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Insurance
Loss Reserves
We purchase comprehensive general liability, morticians and
cemetery professional liability, automobile liability and
workers compensation insurance coverage structured with
high deductibles. The high deductible insurance program means we
are primarily self-insured for claims and associated costs and
losses covered by these policies. As of December 31, 2007
and 2006 we had recorded a reserve of $69.9 million and
$67.7 million, respectively.
Litigation
We are a party to various litigation matters, investigations,
and proceedings. For each of our outstanding legal matters, we
evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter,
possible legal or settlement strategies, and the likelihood of
an unfavorable outcome. We intend to defend ourselves in the
lawsuits described herein; however, if we determine that an
unfavorable outcome is probable and can be reasonably estimated,
we establish the necessary accruals. We hold certain insurance
policies that may reduce cash outflows with respect to an
adverse outcome of certain of these litigation matters. We
accrue such insurance recoveries when they become probable of
being paid and can be reasonably estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation
International, et al; Civil Action 04-MD-1609; In the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The
2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and
consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
of three lawsuits Edgar Neufeld v. Service
Corporation International, et al; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et. Al .; Cause
No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL;
In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada;
and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation
International, et. Al. ; Cause
No. 04-CV-20114;
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants SCI and
several of SCIs current and former executive officers or
directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class
action alleging that the defendants failed to disclose the
unlawful treatment of human remains and gravesites at two
cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida.
Since the action is in its preliminary stages, no discovery has
occurred, and we cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any,
for the payment of damages.
Burial Practices Claims. We are named as a
defendant in various lawsuits alleging improper burial practices
at certain of our cemetery locations. These lawsuits include the
Valls and Garcia lawsuits described in the
following paragraphs.
Maria Valls, Pedro Valls and Roberto Valls, on behalf of
themselves and all other similarly situated v. SCI Funeral
Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Memorial Plan a/k/a Flagler
Memorial Park, John Does and Jane Does ; Case
No. 23693CA08; In the Circuit Court of the
11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida
(Valls Lawsuit). The Valls Lawsuit was filed
December 5, 2005, and named a subsidiary of SCI as a
defendant. Plaintiffs have requested that the court certify this
matter as a class action. The plaintiffs allege the defendants
improperly handled remains, did not keep adequate records of
interments, and engaged in various other improprieties in
connection with the operation of the cemetery. Although the
plaintiffs seek to certify as a class all family members of
persons buried at the cemetery, the court dismissed
plaintiffs class action allegations on two occasions;
however, the dismissals were without prejudice. Plaintiffs have
filed a third amended complaint and we have again moved to
dismiss the class action allegations. The plaintiffs are seeking
monetary damages and have reserved the right to seek leave from
the court to claim punitive damages. The plaintiffs are also
seeking injunctive relief. Since the action is in its
preliminary stages, we cannot quantify our ultimate liability,
if any, for the payment of any damages.
In addition to the Valls Lawsuit, we have met with separate
counsel representing other families who have made burial
practices claims related to this cemetery. In cooperation with
the families, our cemetery management
85
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
initiated an investigation into certain of the families
claims. After working with the families and their counsel, we
reached an agreement to settle all of their claims.
Reyvis Garcia and Alicia Garcia v. Alderwoods Group,
Inc., Osiris Holding of Florida, Inc, a Florida corporation,
d/b/a Graceland Memorial Park South, f/k/a Paradise Memorial
Gardens, Inc. , was filed in December 2004, in the Circuit
Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade
County, Florida, Case No.:
04-25646 CA
32. Plaintiffs are the son and sister of the decedent, Eloisa
Garcia, who was buried at Graceland Memorial Park South in March
1986, when the cemetery was owned by Paradise Memorial Gardens,
Inc. Initially, the suit sought damages on the individual claims
of the plaintiffs relating to the burial of Eloisa Garcia.
Plaintiffs claimed that due to poor record keeping, spacing
issues and maps, and the fact that the family could not afford
to purchase a marker for the grave, the burial location of the
decedent could not be readily located. Subsequently, the
decedents grave was located and verified. In July 2006,
plaintiffs amended their complaint, seeking to certify a class
of all persons buried at this cemetery whose burial sites cannot
be located, claiming that this is due to poor record keeping,
maps, and surveys at the cemetery. Plaintiffs subsequently filed
a third amended class action complaint and added two additional
named plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified
monetary damages, as well as equitable and injunctive relief. No
class has been certified in this matter. Since the action is in
its preliminary stages, we cannot quantify our ultimate
liability, if any, for the payment of any damages.
Funeral Regulations Lawsuits. We are named as
a defendant in various lawsuits alleging violations of federal
and state funeral related regulations
and/or
statutes, including the Hijar, Baudino, and
Sanchez lawsuits described in the following paragraphs.
David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI
Funeral Services, Inc., and Service Corporation
International; In the County Court of El Paso, County,
Texas, County Court at Law Number Three; Cause Number
2002-740,
(the Hijar Lawsuit). The Hijar Lawsuit was initially
filed as a putative state-wide class action brought on behalf of
all persons, entities, and organizations who purchased funeral
services from SCI or its subsidiaries in Texas at any time since
March 18, 1998. Plaintiffs allege that federal and Texas
funeral related regulations
and/or
statutes (Rules) required us to disclose our markups
on all items obtained from third parties in connection with
funeral service contracts and that the failure to make certain
disclosures of markups resulted in breach of contract and other
legal claims. The plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified
amount of monetary damages. The plaintiffs also seek
attorneys fees, costs of court, pre- and post-judgment
interest, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory
relief. We deny that the plaintiffs have standing to sue
for violations of the Texas Occupations Code or the Rules, deny
that plaintiffs have standing to sue for violations under the
relevant regulations and statutes, deny that any breaches of
contractual terms occurred, and on other grounds deny liability
on all of the plaintiffs claims. We deny that the Hijar
Lawsuit satisfies the requirements for class certification.
In May 2004, the trial court heard summary judgment
cross-motions filed by us and plaintiff Hijar (at that time, the
only plaintiff). The trial court granted Hijars motion for
partial summary judgment and denied our motion. In its partial
summary judgment order, the trial court made certain findings to
govern the case, consistent with its summary judgment ruling.
Our request for rehearing was denied.
During the course of the Hijar Lawsuit, the parties disputed the
proper scope and substance of discovery. Following briefing by
both parties and evidentiary hearings, the trial court entered
three orders against us for which we sought appellate review:
(a) a January 2005 discovery sanctions order; (b) an
April 2005 discovery sanctions order; and (c) an April 2005
certification order, certifying a class and two subclasses. On
April 29, 2005, we filed an appeal regarding the
certification order and, concurrently with our initial brief in
that appeal, filed a separate mandamus proceeding regarding the
sanctions orders.
In the certification appeal, the court of appeals issued an
opinion holding that the plaintiffs do not have a private right
of action for monetary damages under the relevant regulations
and statutes. The opinion concludes that the plaintiffs do not
have standing to assert their claims for monetary damages on
behalf of themselves or the class. The court of appeals
therefore reversed the trial courts order certifying a
class, rendered judgment against the
86
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
plaintiffs on their claims for damages, and remanded the
remaining general individual claims for injunctive relief back
to the trial court (without opining on the merits of those
claims) for further handling consistent with the courts
opinion. Plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing on
August 11, 2006. On January 11, 2007, in response to
the motion, the court of appeals issued a substitute opinion in
which the court revised a portion of its discussion but reached
the same result on certification (i.e., the class was
decertified). Plaintiffs second motion for rehearing was
denied.
On March 20, 2007, plaintiffs filed a petition for review
in the Supreme Court of Texas. At the Supreme Courts
request, we filed a response. On September 28, 2007, the
Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs petition for review.
The Supreme Court issued its final order to the court of appeals
on November 13, 2007. On November 27, 2007, the court
of appeals issued its mandate, returning jurisdiction over the
individual plaintiffs lawsuit to the trial court for
proceedings consistent with the court of appeals opinion
on rehearing.
In the mandamus proceeding, the court of appeals denied the
mandamus petition in January 2006, and denied rehearing on
March 15, 2006. We filed a petition for writ of mandamus in
the Supreme Court of Texas, which on September 11, 2006
requested full briefing on the merits. On October 12, 2007,
after full briefing on the merits, the Supreme Court of Texas
granted our request and directed the trial court to vacate its
sanction orders. On February 21, 2008, the plaintiffs
voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, all of their claims
against us, ending the case.
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al; the plaintiffs counsel in the
Hijar Lawsuit initiated an arbitration claim raising similar
issues in California and filed in November 2004 a case styled
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al ; in Los Angeles County Superior
Court; Case No. BC324007 (Baudino Lawsuit). The
Baudino Lawsuit makes claims similar to those made in the Hijar
lawsuit. However, the Baudino Lawsuit seeks a nation-wide class
of plaintiffs. On September 15, 2006, the trial court
granted our motion for summary judgment on the merits.
Plaintiffs are appealing the summary judgment ruling.
Richard Sanchez et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
et al was filed in February 2005 in the Superior Court
of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles,
Central District; Case No. BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to
certify a nationwide class on behalf of all consumers who
purchased funeral goods and services from Alderwoods. Plaintiffs
allege in essence that the Federal Trade Commissions
Funeral Rule requires Alderwoods to disclose its markups on all
items obtained from third-parties in connection with funeral
service contracts. Plaintiffs allege further that Alderwoods has
failed to make such disclosures. Plaintiffs seek to recover an
unspecified amount of monetary damages, attorneys fees,
costs, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory
relief. This case is substantially similar to the Baudino
Lawsuit, and we expect that the outcome of this case will be
governed by the law applied in the Baudino Lawsuit.
Antitrust Claims. We are named as a defendant
in two related class action antitrust cases filed in 2005. The
first case is Cause No 4:05-CV-03394; Funeral Consumers
Alliance, Inc. v. Service Corporation International,
et al ; In the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas Houston (Funeral
Consumers Case). This is a purported class action on
behalf of casket consumers throughout the United States alleging
that we and several other companies involved in the funeral
industry violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws
by engaging in various anti-competitive conduct associated with
the sale of caskets.
The second case is Cause
No. 4:05-CV-03399;
Pioneer Valley Casket, et al. v. Service Corporation
International, et al.; In the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division
(Pioneer Valley Case). This lawsuit makes the same
allegations as the Funeral Consumers Case and is also brought
against several other companies involved in the funeral
industry. Unlike the Funeral Consumers Case, the Pioneer Case is
a purported class action on behalf of all independent casket
distributors that are in the business or were in the business
any time between July 18, 2001 to the present.
The Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case seek
injunctions, monetary damages, and treble damages. The
plaintiffs in the Funeral Consumers Case filed an expert report
indicating that the damages sought from all defendants range
from approximately $950 million to $1.5 billion,
before trebling. Additionally, the
87
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
plaintiffs in the Pioneer Valley Case filed an expert report
indicating that the damages sought from all defendants would be
approximately $99 million, before trebling. We deny that we
engaged in anticompetitive practices related to our casket sales
and intend to vigorously contest these claims and
plaintiffs damages reports. In both cases, we have filed
reports of our experts which vigorously dispute the validity of
the plaintiffs damages theories and calculations. Since
the litigation is in its preliminary stages, we cannot quantify
our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
In addition to the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley
Case, we received Civil Investigative Demands, dated August 2005
and February 2006, from the Attorney General of Maryland on
behalf of itself and other state attorneys general, who have
commenced an investigation of alleged anticompetitive practices
in the funeral industry. We have also received similar Civil
Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General of Florida and
Connecticut.
Wage and Hour Claims. We are named a defendant
in various lawsuits alleging violations of federal and state
laws regulating wage and hour overtime pay, including the
lawsuits described in the following paragraphs.
Prise, et al., v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., and Service
Corporation International; Cause
No. 06-164;
In the United States District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania (the Wage and Hour Lawsuit). The Wage
and Hour Lawsuit was filed by two former Alderwoods
(Pennsylvania), Inc., employees in December 2006 and purports to
have been brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA) on behalf of all Alderwoods and SCI
affiliated employees who performed work for which they were not
fully compensated, including work for which overtime pay was
owed. The court has conditionally certified a class of claims as
to certain job positions for Alderwoods employees. On three
occasions, the court has denied without prejudice
plaintiffs request for certification of claims against SCI
and has dismissed such claims without prejudice.
Plaintiffs allege causes of action for violations of the FLSA,
failure to maintain proper records, breach of contract,
violations of state wage and hour laws, unjust enrichment, fraud
and deceit, quantum meruit, negligent misrepresentation, and
negligence. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, unpaid wages,
liquidated, compensatory, consequential and punitive damages,
attorneys fees and costs, and pre- and post-judgment
interest. The Wage and Hour Lawsuit is in its preliminary stages
and we cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any.
Prise, et al., v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., and Service
Corporation International; Cause No. RG7384642; In the
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda.
This lawsuit is related to the Wage and Hour Lawsuit and was
filed in July 2007. It raises state law claims that were
previously dismissed by the court in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit.
We removed the case to federal court and moved to dismiss the
plaintiffs claims. In response, the plaintiffs voluntarily
dismissed the case in December 2007.
Bryant, et al. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., Service Corporation
International, et al.; Case
No. 3:07-CV-5696-SI;
In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California. This lawsuit was filed on November 8, 2007
against SCI and various subsidiaries and individuals. It too is
related to the Wage and Hour Lawsuit, raising similar claims and
brought by the same attorneys. The lawsuit is in its preliminary
stages, and we cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any.
Bryant, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al.;
Case
No. RG-07359593;
and Helm, et al. v. AWGI & SCI; Case
No. RG-07359602;
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
Almeda. These cases were filed on December 5, 2007 by
counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit. These cases
assert state law claims like those previously dismissed in the
Wage and Hour Lawsuit. The lawsuits are in their preliminary
stages, and we cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any.
Stickle, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et
al.; Case
No. 08-CV-83;
In the U.S. District Court for Arizona, Phoenix Division.
Counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit filed this
case on January 17, 2008, against SCI and various related
entities and individuals asserting FLSA and other ancillary
claims based on the alleged failure to pay for overtime.
Plaintiffs seek the same class notice to SCI and related
entities that were rejected
88
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
by the Court in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit. The lawsuit is in its
preliminary stages and we cannot quantify our ultimate
liability, if any.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above cannot be
determined at this time. We intend to aggressively defend all of
the above lawsuits; however, an adverse decision in one or more
of such matters could have a material adverse effect on us, our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
(All
shares reported in whole numbers)
Share
Authorization
We are authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $1 per share par value. No preferred shares were issued
as of December 31, 2007 or 2006. At December 31, 2007
and 2006, 500,000,000 common shares of $1 par value were
authorized. We had 262,858,169 and 293,222,114 shares
issued and outstanding, net of 1,961,300 and 10,000 shares
held in treasury at par at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Share
Purchase Rights Plan
Our preferred share purchase rights plan declares a dividend of
one preferred share purchase right for each share of common
stock outstanding. The rights are exercisable in the event
certain investors attempt to acquire 20% or more of our common
stock and entitle the rights holders to purchase certain of our
securities or the securities of the acquiring company. The
rights, which are redeemable by us for $.01 per right, expire in
July 2008 unless extended.
89
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Our components of accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
income at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(38,349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38,349
|
)
|
Activity in 2005
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,226
|
)
|
|
|
(69,226
|
)
|
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity attributable
to the non-controlling interest holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,226
|
|
|
|
69,226
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net loss
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
70,499
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
70,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in 2006
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
|
(2,692
|
)
|
Adjustment upon initial adoption of FAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(623
|
)
|
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,751
|
)
|
|
|
(37,751
|
)
|
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity attributable
to the non-controlling interest holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,751
|
|
|
|
37,751
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment realized in net loss
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
76,652
|
|
|
$
|
(623
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,731
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in 2007
|
|
|
92,003
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
(5,699
|
)
|
|
|
86,927
|
|
Increase in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,438
|
|
|
|
105,438
|
|
Reclassification of unrealized gains activity attributable to
the non-controlling interest holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105,438
|
)
|
|
|
(105,438
|
)
|
Reclassification for losses on available-for-sale securities
realized in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
|
|
9,430
|
|
Reclassification for translation adjustment in net gain
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
152,590
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reclassification for losses on available-for-sale securities
adjustment of $9.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 primarily relates to the sale of a
consolidated subsidiary and is included in Income from
discontinued operations on the consolidated statement of
operations. The reclassification for translation adjustment of
$16.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
relates to the sale of our unconsolidated French subsidiary and
is included in equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
on our consolidated statement of operations.
The reclassification adjustment of $5.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 primarily relates to the sale
of our operations in Singapore. The $3.7 million unrealized
loss on investment securities is related to investment
securities held by a consolidated subsidiary. The
reclassification adjustment of $101.6 million during the
year ended December 31, 2005 includes $71.8 million
related to the sale of our operations in Argentina and Uruguay
and $29.8 million related to the sale of our cemetery
businesses in Chile.
90
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated
into U.S. dollars using the current exchange rate. The
U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as
well as exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a
long-term investment nature, are included in the cumulative
currency translation adjustments in Accumulated other
comprehensive (loss) income. Income taxes are generally not
provided for foreign currency translation.
Share
Repurchase Program
Subject to market conditions, normal trading restrictions, and
limitations in our debt covenants, we may make purchases in the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions under
our share repurchase program. During 2007, we repurchased
38.5 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$505.1 million including commissions, or an average cost
per share of $13.13. During 2006, we repurchased
3.4 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$27.9 million. During 2005, we repurchased
31.0 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of
$225.2 million. In November 2007, our Board of Directors
approved an increase in our share repurchase program authorizing
the investment of up to an additional $250 million to
repurchase our common stock. The remaining dollar value of
shares authorized to be purchased under the share repurchase
program was $145.6 million at December 31, 2007.
Subsequent to December 31, 2007, we repurchased an
additional 1.6 million shares of common stock at an
aggregate cost of $22.5 million including commissions, or
an average cost per share of $13.68. After these purchases, the
remaining dollar value of shares authorized to be purchased
under our share repurchase program was approximately
$123.1 million.
Cash
Dividends
On November 14, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a
cash dividend of $.04 per common share. At December 31,
2007, this dividend totaling $10.6 million was recorded in
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and Capital
in Excess of Par Value in the consolidated balance
sheet. Subsequent to December 31, 2007, this dividend was
paid. We paid $34.6 million and $29.4 million in cash
dividends in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
15.
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
Stock
Benefit Plans
We maintain benefit plans whereby shares of our common stock may
be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options or
restricted stock granted to officers and key employees. Our
Amended 1996 Incentive Plan reserves 34,000,000 shares of
common stock for outstanding and future awards of stock options,
restricted stock, and other stock based awards to officers and
key employees.
The benefit plans allow for options to be granted as either
non-qualified or incentive stock options. The options
historically have been granted only once each year, or upon
hire, as approved by the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors. The options are granted with an exercise price equal
to the market price of our common stock on the date the grant is
approved by the compensation committee of the Board of
Directors. The options are generally exercisable at a rate of
331/3%
each year unless alternative vesting methods are approved by the
compensation committee of the Board of Directors. Restricted
stock awards are generally expensed to income ratably over the
period during which the restrictions lapse. At December 31,
2007 and 2006, 13,358,979 and 2,615,487 shares,
respectively, were reserved for future option and restricted
stock grants under these stock benefit plans.
We utilize the Black-Scholes option valuation model for
estimating the fair value of our stock options. This model
allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility,
the risk-free interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend
yield. The expected volatility utilized in the valuation model
is based on implied volatilities from traded options on our
stock and the historical volatility of our stock price. The
dividend yield and the expected holding period are both based on
historical experience and managements estimate of future
events. The risk-free
91
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve
based on the expected life of the option in effect at the time
of grant. The fair values of our stock options are calculated
using the following weighted average assumptions based on the
methods described above for the years ended December 31,
2007, 2006, and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Expected holding period
|
|
|
5.9 years
|
|
|
|
5.6 years
|
|
|
|
5.5 years
|
|
The following table shows a summary of information with respect
to stock option and restricted share compensation for 2007 and
2006 and for 2005, which are included in our consolidated
statement of operations for those respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total pretax share-based compensation expense included in net
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
8,787
|
|
|
$
|
7,035
|
|
|
$
|
2,086
|
|
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation included
in net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,401
|
|
|
$
|
3,198
|
|
|
$
|
782
|
|
Stock
Options
The following table sets forth stock option activity for the
year ended December 31, 2007:
(Shares reported in whole numbers and not in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
22,531,316
|
|
|
$
|
7.79
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,234,900
|
|
|
|
10.86
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(7,732,382
|
)
|
|
|
6.83
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(17,600
|
)
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(3,447,789
|
)
|
|
|
17.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13,568,445
|
|
|
$
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
10,068,822
|
|
|
$
|
5.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value for
stock options outstanding and exercisable was
$106.7 million and $91.4 million, respectively. Set
forth below is certain information related to stock options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007:
(Shares reported in whole numbers and not in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Exercisable at
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Range of
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$0.00 4.00
|
|
|
4,719,000
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
|
|
4,719,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
4.01 6.00
|
|
|
3,425,000
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
3,425,000
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
6.01 9.00
|
|
|
2,986,722
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
7.57
|
|
|
|
1,606,399
|
|
|
|
7.29
|
|
9.01 15.00
|
|
|
2,175,300
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
10.87
|
|
|
|
56,000
|
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
15.01 38.00
|
|
|
262,423
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
17.20
|
|
|
|
262,423
|
|
|
|
17.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.00 38.00
|
|
|
13,568,445
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
10,068,822
|
|
|
$
|
5.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other information pertaining to option activity during the years
ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted
(valued using Black-Scholes model)
|
|
$
|
4.35
|
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
$
|
2.71
|
|
Total fair value of stock options vested
|
|
$
|
3,965
|
|
|
$
|
1,987
|
|
|
$
|
6,003
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
$
|
47,800
|
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
|
$
|
7,523
|
|
We calculated our historical pool of windfall tax benefits by
comparing the book expense for individual stock grants and the
related tax deduction for options granted after January 1,
1995. Adjustments were made to exclude windfall tax benefits
that were not realized due to our net operating loss position
prior to December 31, 2006. Upon completion of this
calculation, we determined an additional paid in capital pool of
$2.1 million. The tax benefits realized from stock option
exercises in 2007 was $18.5 million.
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, cash
received from the exercise of stock options was
$52.9 million and $5.9 million, respectively. We
recognized compensation cost of $5.4 million and
$4.0 million related to stock options in the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of
December 31, 2007, the unrecognized compensation expense
related to stock options of $7.8 million is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
Restricted
Shares
Restricted shares awarded under the Amended 1996 Incentive Plan
were 313,800 in 2007 and 359,900 in 2006. The weighted average
fair market value per share at the date of grant for shares
granted during 2007 and 2006 was $10.73 and $8.24, respectively.
The fair market value of the stock, as determined on the grant
date, is being amortized and charged to income (with an
offsetting credit to Capital in excess of par value)
generally over the average period during which the restrictions
lapse. At December 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation
expense of $3.3 million related to restricted shares, which
is recorded in Capital in excess of par value on the
balance sheet, is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.3 years. Prior to the implementation of
SFAS 123R, we recorded this compensation as Unrecognized
compensation on the balance sheet. We recognized
compensation cost of $3.4 million, $3.0 million, and
$2.1 million in the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006, and 2005, respectively, related to the restricted shares
of this Plan.
93
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Restricted share activity was as follows:
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
795,176
|
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
313,800
|
|
|
$
|
10.73
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(434,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.41
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to termination in the fourth quarter of 2007, we had a
non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering employees
in the United States (U.S. Pension Plan). We currently have a
supplemental retirement plan for certain current and former key
employees (SERP), a supplemental retirement plan for officers
and certain key employees (Senior SERP), a retirement plan for
certain non-employee directors (Directors Plan), the
Employees Retirement Plan of Rose Hills, the Retirement Plan for
Rose Hills Trustees, and the Rose Hills Supplemental Retirement
Plan (collectively, the Plans). We also provide a
401(k) employee savings plan.
Effective January 1, 2001, we curtailed our U.S. Pension
Plan, SERP, Senior SERP, and Directors Plan. Additionally,
the plans assumed in connection with the Alderwoods acquisition
are frozen. As the Plans have been frozen, the participants do
not earn incremental benefits from additional years of service
and have not incurred new service cost after December 31,
2000.
Retirement benefits under the SERP are based on years of service
and average monthly compensation, reduced by benefits under the
US Pension Plan and Social Security. The Senior SERP provides
retirement benefits based on years of service and position. The
Directors Plan provides for an annual benefit to directors
following retirement, based on a vesting schedule.
The components of the Plans net periodic benefit cost for
the years ended December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
6,559
|
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
|
$
|
8,111
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(5,483
|
)
|
|
|
(6,829
|
)
|
|
|
(7,226
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Recognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
2,961
|
|
|
|
8,124
|
|
Plan dissolution and other
|
|
|
11,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,472
|
|
|
$
|
3,663
|
|
|
$
|
9,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Plans funded status at December 31 was as follows
(based on valuations as of September 30):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
|
$
|
137,252
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,183
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
6,559
|
|
|
|
7,348
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
11,558
|
|
|
|
2,644
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(64,034
|
)
|
|
|
(17,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
104,207
|
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
84,686
|
|
|
$
|
80,803
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,746
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
|
|
6,829
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
41,894
|
|
|
|
3,928
|
|
Benefits paid, including expenses
|
|
|
(64,959
|
)
|
|
|
(17,620
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
67,104
|
|
|
$
|
84,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status of plan
|
|
$
|
(37,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(65,438
|
)
|
Adoption of SFAS 158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
$
|
(37,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligations
|
|
$
|
104,207
|
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
104,207
|
|
|
$
|
150,124
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
$
|
67,104
|
|
|
$
|
84,686
|
|
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$
|
(37,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(65,438
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
$
|
(37,103
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,815
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The retirement benefits under the SERP, Senior SERP,
Directors Plan, the Rose Hills Trustee Plan, and the Rose
Hills SERP Plan are unfunded obligations of the Company. As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the benefit obligation of the
SERP, Senior SERP, and Directors Plan (excluding the Rose
Hills SERP) was $27.7 million and $29.0 million,
respectively. We have purchased various life insurance policies
on the participants in the Senior SERP with the intent to use
the proceeds or any cash value buildup from such policies to
assist in meeting, at least to the extent of such assets, the
plans funding requirements. The face value of these
insurance policies at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was
$59.5 million and $55.7 million, respectively, and the
cash surrender value was $42.0 million and
$38.7 million as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. No loans are outstanding against the policies, but
there are no restrictions in the policies regarding loans.
The Plans weighted-average assumptions used to determine
the benefit obligation and net benefit cost were as follows: We
base our discount rate used to compute future benefit
obligations using an analysis of expected future benefit
payments. The reasonableness of our discount rate is verified by
comparing the rate to the rate earned on high-quality fixed
income investments, such as the Moodys Aa index, on
high-quality fixed income investments plus 50 basis points.
Weighted-average discount rates used to determine pension
obligations for the Plans were
95
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
5.64%, 5.55%, and 5.75% for the years ended 2007, 2006, and
2005, respectively. The assumed rate of return on plan assets
was not applicable as we recognize gains and losses on plan
assets during the year in which they occur. As all Plans are
curtailed, the assumed rate of compensation increase is zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Discount rate used to determine obligations
|
|
|
5.64
|
%
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Assumed rate of return on plan assets
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Discount rate used to determine net periodic pension cost
|
|
|
5.53
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
The Plans weighted-average asset allocations at December
31 by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Fixed income investments
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Equity securities(1)
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equity securities do not include shares of our common stock at
December 31, 2007 or 2006. |
Our non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan covering
approximately 34% of our United States employees was terminated
in December 2007. The revaluation of projected benefit
obligation (PBO) on a plan termination basis resulted in an
additional PBO of $4.7 million. On the asset side, the fund
experienced a negative actual return in the fourth quarter and
paid expenses from the fund, the total of which was
$0.5 million. In 2007 we made a contribution of
$38.8 million to fully fund the plan bringing the value of
assets to $56.4 million prior to adjusting for benefits
paid and settlement of the obligation. To effect the termination
of the plan, we settled all remaining obligations in December
2007. Monthly annuities paid were $0.8 million for the
fourth quarter, lump sums paid were $14.4 million, and the
total annuity purchase for remaining obligations was
$41.2 million for a total of $56.4 million. Of this,
the lump sums paid and annuity purchases totaling
$55.6 million were considered settlements under
FAS 88. After all fourth quarter FAS 88 adjustments
were made, the outstanding balances of our PBO and accumulated
other comprehensive income related to the U.S. Pension Plan are
$0.
The following Plan benefit payments are expected to be paid
(assuming no plan terminations):
|
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
$
|
4,017
|
|
2009
|
|
|
4,386
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,671
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,656
|
|
Years 2013 through 2017
|
|
|
20,603
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the $4.0 million expected benefit payments for
2008 is $3.2 million we expect to contribute for the SERP,
Senior SERP, Directors Plan, Rose Hills Retirement Plan
for Trustees, and Rose Hills SERP expected benefit payments. |
On December 31, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement
No. 158 Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. The
objective of the Statement is to improve financial reporting by
requiring an employer to recognize the funded status of a
benefit plan measured as the difference between plan
assets at fair value and the projected benefit
obligation in its statement of financial position.
SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize as a component
of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the gains and losses
and prior service costs or credits that arise during the period
which were not recognized as components of net periodic benefit
96
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
costs pursuant to FASB Statement No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, or No. 106, Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension.
The Statement calls for measuring the defined benefit plan
assets and obligations as of the date of the employers
fiscal year-end statement of financial position. The requirement
to change the measurement date is effective for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2008. All of the Plans have a
measurement date of December 31.
The unfunded status of the pension plan had been recognized as a
non-current liability prior to the adoption of SFAS 158. At
year end December 31, 2007 and 2006, the unfunded status
was $37.1 million and $64.8 million, respectively.
We have an employee savings plan that qualifies under
section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for the
exclusive benefit of our United States employees. Under the
plan, participating employees may contribute a portion of their
pretax
and/or after
tax income in accordance with specified guidelines up to a
maximum of 50%. During 2007, 2006, and 2005, we matched a
percentage of the employee contributions through contributions
of cash. For each of the three years, our matching contribution
was based upon the following:
|
|
|
Years of Vesting Service
|
|
Percentage of Deferred Compensation
|
|
0 5 years
|
|
75% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
6 10 years
|
|
110% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
11 or more years
|
|
135% of the first 6% of deferred compensation
|
The amount of our matched contributions in 2007, 2006, and 2005
was $17.0 million, $16.8 million and
$16.5 million, respectively.
Our operations are both product based and geographically based,
and the reportable operating segments presented below include
our funeral and cemetery operations. Our geographic areas
include United States and Foreign.
Alderwoods operating results are included in our full-year 2007
results and since November 28, 2006 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Please refer to Note 4 for pro
forma presentations related to the Alderwoods acquisition for
2006.
Foreign operations consists of our operations in Canada and
Germany. Results from our funeral and cemetery businesses in
Argentina and Uruguay, which were sold in the first quarter of
2005, our cemetery business in Chile, which was sold in the
third quarter of 2005, and our funeral business in Singapore,
which was sold in the fourth quarter of 2006, are classified as
discontinued operations for all periods presented. We conduct
both funeral and cemetery operations in the United States and
Canada and funeral operations in Germany.
97
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,525,349
|
|
|
$
|
759,954
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,897
|
|
|
|
1,837
|
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
100,451
|
|
|
|
25,457
|
|
|
|
125,908
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
308,626
|
|
|
|
159,874
|
|
|
|
468,500
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,245,164
|
|
|
|
4,262,264
|
|
|
|
8,507,428
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
77,625
|
|
|
|
78,777
|
|
|
|
156,402
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,161,762
|
|
|
$
|
591,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,384
|
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
69,036
|
|
|
|
18,037
|
|
|
|
87,073
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
241,963
|
|
|
|
108,298
|
|
|
|
350,261
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,505,437
|
|
|
|
4,575,424
|
|
|
|
9,080,861
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
38,031
|
|
|
|
53,506
|
|
|
|
91,537
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,156,627
|
|
|
$
|
560,380
|
|
|
$
|
1,717,007
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
5,663
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
49,529
|
|
|
|
17,828
|
|
|
|
67,357
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
221,121
|
|
|
|
81,921
|
|
|
|
303,042
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,360,546
|
|
|
|
3,600,473
|
|
|
|
6,961,019
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
48,153
|
|
|
|
46,756
|
|
|
|
94,909
|
|
98
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reconciles certain reportable segment
amounts to our corresponding consolidated amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
|
|
138,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,854
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
125,908
|
|
|
|
4,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,429
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,507,428
|
|
|
|
424,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,932,244
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
156,402
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,011
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,852
|
|
|
|
114,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,399
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
87,073
|
|
|
|
9,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,684
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,080,861
|
|
|
|
275,160
|
|
|
|
373,368
|
|
|
|
9,729,389
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
91,537
|
|
|
|
5,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,527
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,717,007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,717,007
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,663
|
|
|
|
98,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,733
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
67,357
|
|
|
|
7,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,866
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,961,019
|
|
|
|
583,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,544,769
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
94,909
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,605
|
|
The following table reconciles gross profits from reportable
segments shown above to our consolidated income from continuing
operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of
accounting changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gross profit from reportable segments
|
|
$
|
468,500
|
|
|
$
|
350,261
|
|
|
$
|
303,042
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(137,406
|
)
|
|
|
(94,900
|
)
|
|
|
(84,834
|
)
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
16,920
|
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
|
(26,093
|
)
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
346,166
|
|
|
|
196,678
|
|
|
|
192,115
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(146,854
|
)
|
|
|
(123,399
|
)
|
|
|
(103,733
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
11,725
|
|
|
|
31,171
|
|
|
|
16,706
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(14,986
|
)
|
|
|
(17,532
|
)
|
|
|
(14,258
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
36,607
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on redemption of securities
|
|
|
158,133
|
|
|
|
10,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(3,804
|
)
|
|
|
(1,453
|
)
|
|
|
(3,703
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
$
|
386,987
|
|
|
$
|
97,449
|
|
|
$
|
87,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our geographic area information was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
2,079,088
|
|
|
$
|
206,215
|
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(146,632
|
)
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
(146,854
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
116,071
|
|
|
|
14,358
|
|
|
|
130,429
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
31,454
|
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
35,824
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
318,348
|
|
|
|
27,818
|
|
|
|
346,166
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
18,942
|
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
16,920
|
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
4,161,000
|
|
|
$
|
581,713
|
|
|
$
|
4,742,713
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,630,680
|
|
|
$
|
122,208
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
123,112
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
123,399
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
88,908
|
|
|
|
7,776
|
|
|
|
96,684
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
25,829
|
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
28,263
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
178,943
|
|
|
|
17,735
|
|
|
|
196,678
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(56,710
|
)
|
|
|
(1,973
|
)
|
|
|
(58,683
|
)
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
5,043,144
|
|
|
$
|
514,718
|
|
|
$
|
5,557,862
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,602,419
|
|
|
$
|
114,588
|
|
|
$
|
1,717,007
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
103,650
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
103,733
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
69,791
|
|
|
|
5,075
|
|
|
|
74,866
|
|
Amortization of cemetery property
|
|
|
24,167
|
|
|
|
3,338
|
|
|
|
27,505
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
167,783
|
|
|
|
24,332
|
|
|
|
192,115
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
(27,597
|
)
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
(26,093
|
)
|
Long-lived assets
|
|
$
|
3,433,506
|
|
|
$
|
245,791
|
|
|
$
|
3,679,297
|
|
100
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Supplementary
Information
|
The detail of certain balance sheet accounts is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
42,928
|
|
|
$
|
14,883
|
|
Commercial paper and temporary investments
|
|
|
125,666
|
|
|
|
24,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
168,594
|
|
|
$
|
39,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable
|
|
$
|
4,753
|
|
|
$
|
6,144
|
|
Atneed funeral receivables, net
|
|
|
82,734
|
|
|
|
82,450
|
|
Atneed cemetery receivables, net
|
|
|
16,068
|
|
|
|
6,869
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,238
|
|
|
|
11,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,793
|
|
|
$
|
107,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
$
|
2,255
|
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
Prepaid insurance
|
|
|
4,932
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20,074
|
|
|
|
30,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,261
|
|
|
$
|
43,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undeveloped land
|
|
$
|
1,078,322
|
|
|
$
|
1,136,334
|
|
Developed land, lawn crypts and mausoleums
|
|
|
373,344
|
|
|
|
358,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,451,666
|
|
|
$
|
1,495,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
494,715
|
|
|
$
|
516,256
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
1,355,324
|
|
|
|
1,337,286
|
|
Operating equipment
|
|
|
464,153
|
|
|
|
414,670
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
24,314
|
|
|
|
26,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,338,506
|
|
|
|
2,294,705
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(768,972
|
)
|
|
|
(653,352
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,569,534
|
|
|
$
|
1,641,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid covenants-not-to-compete, net
|
|
$
|
58,640
|
|
|
$
|
68,850
|
|
Investments, net
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
4,839
|
|
Preneed backlog intangible assets
|
|
|
40,900
|
|
|
|
86,640
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
77,321
|
|
|
|
79,886
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
23,658
|
|
|
|
7,354
|
|
Notes receivable, net
|
|
|
25,172
|
|
|
|
28,042
|
|
Cash surrender value of insurance policies
|
|
|
75,385
|
|
|
|
61,405
|
|
Other
|
|
|
95,098
|
|
|
|
99,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
400,734
|
|
|
$
|
436,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Receivables, net on our consolidated balance
sheet are funeral and cemetery atneed allowances for doubtful
accounts of approximately $19.5 million and
$25.8 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
101
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
53,739
|
|
|
$
|
75,037
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
59,389
|
|
|
|
57,153
|
|
Restructuring liability
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
|
|
7,564
|
|
Accrued dividend
|
|
|
10,585
|
|
|
|
8,788
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
26,101
|
|
|
|
25,805
|
|
Self insurance
|
|
|
69,914
|
|
|
|
67,698
|
|
Accrued trust expenses
|
|
|
10,066
|
|
|
|
11,069
|
|
Bank overdraft
|
|
|
27,689
|
|
|
|
20,480
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
82,850
|
|
|
|
67,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
343,392
|
|
|
$
|
341,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension
|
|
$
|
37,103
|
|
|
$
|
65,438
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
24,105
|
|
|
|
15,565
|
|
Customer refund obligation reserve
|
|
|
93,626
|
|
|
|
83,951
|
|
Tax liability
|
|
|
146,995
|
|
|
|
104,874
|
|
Indemnification liability
|
|
|
27,532
|
|
|
|
26,364
|
|
Other
|
|
|
54,281
|
|
|
|
61,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
383,642
|
|
|
$
|
357,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenues
and Costs and Expenses
The detail of certain income statement accounts in thousands is
as follows for the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Merchandise revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$
|
515,944
|
|
|
$
|
424,786
|
|
|
$
|
504,415
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
519,066
|
|
|
|
391,231
|
|
|
|
381,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total merchandise revenues
|
|
|
1,035,010
|
|
|
|
816,017
|
|
|
|
885,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
962,854
|
|
|
|
700,506
|
|
|
|
617,760
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
207,007
|
|
|
|
170,523
|
|
|
|
146,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services revenues
|
|
|
1,169,861
|
|
|
|
871,029
|
|
|
|
763,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
80,432
|
|
|
|
65,842
|
|
|
|
67,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
2,285,303
|
|
|
$
|
1,752,888
|
|
|
$
|
1,717,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
$
|
256,753
|
|
|
$
|
198,053
|
|
|
$
|
196,015
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
205,629
|
|
|
|
161,157
|
|
|
|
158,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of merchandise
|
|
|
462,382
|
|
|
|
359,210
|
|
|
|
354,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
|
|
|
473,559
|
|
|
|
353,117
|
|
|
|
375,840
|
|
Cemetery
|
|
|
112,175
|
|
|
|
93,881
|
|
|
|
96,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services
|
|
|
585,734
|
|
|
|
446,998
|
|
|
|
472,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead and other expenses
|
|
|
768,687
|
|
|
|
596,419
|
|
|
|
586,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
$
|
1,816,803
|
|
|
$
|
1,402,627
|
|
|
$
|
1,413,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain
Non-Cash Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Value of StoneMor partnership units received in disposition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,875
|
|
|
$
|
5,900
|
|
Dividends accrued but not paid
|
|
$
|
10,585
|
|
|
$
|
8,788
|
|
|
$
|
7,415
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share (EPS) excludes dilution
and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other obligations to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that then shared in our earnings
(losses).
103
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted EPS for the three years ended December 31 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes basic
|
|
$
|
243,317
|
|
|
$
|
52,604
|
|
|
$
|
55,091
|
|
After tax interest on convertible debt
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of
accounting changes diluted
|
|
$
|
243,496
|
|
|
$
|
52,604
|
|
|
$
|
55,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
$
|
4,412
|
|
|
$
|
3,907
|
|
|
$
|
4,506
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(187,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (numerator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic
|
|
$
|
247,729
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
After tax interest on convertible debt
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income diluted
|
|
$
|
247,908
|
|
|
$
|
56,511
|
|
|
$
|
(127,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares (denominator):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic
|
|
|
284,966
|
|
|
|
292,859
|
|
|
|
302,213
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
|
|
4,399
|
|
Convertible debt
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
290,444
|
|
|
|
297,371
|
|
|
|
306,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting changes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.83
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
|
$
|
.18
|
|
Income per share from discontinued operations, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.02
|
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
$
|
.02
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.02
|
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
|
$
|
.01
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes per share, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(.62
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(.61
|
)
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.85
|
|
|
$
|
.19
|
|
|
$
|
(.42
|
)
|
The computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share excludes
outstanding stock options and convertible debt in certain
periods in which the inclusion of such options and debt would be
antidilutive in the periods presented. Total
104
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
options and convertible debentures not currently included in the
computation of dilutive earnings (loss) per share for the
respective periods are as follows (in shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Antidilutive options
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
7,039
|
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents excluded from computations
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
7,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Divestiture-Related
Activities
|
As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or
losses on the sale of such businesses are recognized in the
income statement line item Gains (losses) on
dispositions and impairment charges, net. Additionally, as
dispositions occur pursuant to our ongoing asset sale programs,
adjustments are made through this income statement line item to
reflect the difference between actual proceeds received from the
sale compared to the original estimates.
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net
consists of the following for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions, net
|
|
$
|
30,083
|
|
|
$
|
(18,726
|
)
|
|
$
|
68,167
|
|
Impairment losses on assets held for sale
|
|
|
(13,163
|
)
|
|
|
(39,957
|
)
|
|
|
(94,260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,920
|
|
|
$
|
(58,683
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale
of Kenyon Operations
In October 2007, we divested 70% of our Kenyon investment for
proceeds of $0.7 million. We recognized a pre-tax gain of
$0.4 million in Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net in our consolidated statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Sale
of Operations in Michigan
In 2006, our Board of Directors approved a plan to divest
certain funeral homes and cemeteries in Michigan. As a result,
we recognized a pretax impairment charge in 2006 of
$26.4 million on these properties. As of December 31,
2007, these locations are classified as assets held for sale and
we have recorded an additional impairment charge of
approximately $1.6 million.
Sale
of Operations in Singapore
In October 2006, we sold our businesses in Singapore for
proceeds of approximately $11.6 million. We recognized an
after-tax gain in 2006 of $2.9 million in Income from
discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of
operations as a result of this transaction. In 2007, we received
proceeds totaling $1.9 million and recorded a receivable of
$0.8 million related to this sale. We recognized an
after-tax gain in 2007 of $1.5 million in Income from
discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of
operations as a result of this transaction.
Sale
of Operations in Chile
In September 2005, we completed the sale of our cemetery
operations in Chile for proceeds of approximately
$106 million. We received net cash proceeds of
$90.0 million upon completion of the sale and received
additional cash proceeds of CLP 5.8 billion or
approximately $11.0 million in 2006. In the first quarter
of 2007, we received the remainder of the proceeds totaling CLP
2.5 billion or approximately $4.7 million.
105
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Sales
of Assets to StoneMor Partners LP
In December 2007, we sold 46 cemeteries and 30 funeral homes to
StoneMor Partners LP for proceeds of approximately
$71.0 million. As a result of this transaction, we
recognized a pre-tax gain of $21.1 million in Gains
(losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net in our
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
In September 2006, we sold 21 cemeteries and 14 funeral homes to
StoneMor Partners LP (StoneMor) for proceeds of approximately
$11.8 million. We received net cash proceeds of
$5.9 million and 275,046 StoneMor units valued at
$5.9 million. As a result of this transaction, we
recognized a pre-tax loss of $16.6 million in Gains
(losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net in our
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
In November 2005, we sold 21 cemeteries and six funeral homes to
StoneMor for $12.7 million. In the third quarter of 2005,
we had classified these properties as held for sale and recorded
an impairment charge in Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net in our consolidated statement of
operations of approximately $19.6 million, net of a tax
benefit of $10.5 million in our consolidated statement of
operations. In connection with this sale, we received
$6.8 million in cash and 280,952 StoneMor units, valued at
$5.9 million in November of 2005. In 2006, we disposed of
our investment in these StoneMor Limited Partners LP units for
$6.0 million, resulting in a pretax gain of
$0.1 million.
Sale
of Mayflower National Life Insurance Company
In July 2007, we completed the sale of Mayflower National Life
Insurance Company, Alderwoods former insurance subsidiary, to
Assurant Inc. for proceeds of approximately $67.5 million.
We recognized a $1.5 million gain related to this sale in
the third quarter of 2007. The operations of this subsidiary are
presented as discontinued operations in our condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
Equity
Investment and Redemption of Securities
In October 2007, we sold our remaining equity investment in our
French operations for 12.0 million euros, or
$17.0 million and recognized a gain on disposition of
$17.6 million recorded in Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated subsidiaries. Proceeds received from this
sale are classified as an operating cash flow in the
accompanying statement of cash flows. In connection with this
sale, we also received 101.5 million euros, or
$144.0 million, in cash from the redemption of the
remainder of our convertible preferred equity certificates,
which were received in connection with the original disposition
of our operations in France in March 2004. The securities had a
carrying value of zero. In addition, 10 million euros, or
approximately $14.1 million, related to the redemption were
deposited into a euro-denominated escrow account for potential
payment for existing indemnification liabilities. We recognized
a gain of $158.1 million related to the redemption of these
convertible preferred equity certificates. Proceeds of
$158.7 million are classified as investing activities in
the accompanying statement of cash flows.
Assets
Held for Sale
In connection with the acquisition of Alderwoods, we agreed to a
consent order with the staff of the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) whereby we would divest of certain properties identified
by the FTC. In 2007, we divested of all these properties.
In addition, we had committed to a plan to sell certain other
operating properties as of both December 31, 2007 and 2006.
In connection with these assets held for sale, we recorded
impairment losses of approximately $13 million and
$40 million, respectively, in our consolidated statement of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
106
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Net assets held for sale were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
|
$
|
6,330
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
9,944
|
|
|
|
56,968
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments
|
|
|
64,751
|
|
|
|
107,796
|
|
Cemetery property
|
|
|
9,341
|
|
|
|
65,448
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost (net)
|
|
|
9,968
|
|
|
|
23,829
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
12,390
|
|
|
|
13,914
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,127
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
16,232
|
|
|
|
54,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
124,920
|
|
|
|
355,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues
|
|
|
8,388
|
|
|
|
66,841
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues
|
|
|
67,141
|
|
|
|
117,604
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
16,232
|
|
|
|
54,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
92,077
|
|
|
|
240,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets held for sale
|
|
$
|
32,843
|
|
|
$
|
115,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued
Operations
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we disposed of our funeral
operations in Singapore. During the first quarter of 2005, we
disposed of our funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and
Uruguay. During the third quarter of 2005, we also disposed of
our cemetery operations in Chile. Our operations in these
countries are classified as discontinued operations for all
periods presented.
As part of the Alderwoods transaction, we acquired an insurance
subsidiary that we sold on June 30, 2007. The operations of
this subsidiary from November 28, 2006 to June 30,
2007 are presented as discontinued operations in our
consolidated statement of operations and as assets and
liabilities of discontinued operations on our consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2006.
107
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The results of our discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
42,626
|
|
|
$
|
12,324
|
|
|
$
|
27,651
|
|
Gains on dispositions and impairment charges, net
|
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Costs and other expenses
|
|
|
(36,448
|
)
|
|
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
|
(17,433
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
9,230
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
10,467
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,818
|
)
|
|
|
2,548
|
|
|
|
(5,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
4,412
|
|
|
$
|
3,907
|
|
|
$
|
4,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, we reported assets and liabilities
related to discontinued operations as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$
|
2,236
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,974
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
366,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
373,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(2,351
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(311,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
(313,849
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
59,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
21.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
Quarterly financial data for 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
607,555
|
|
|
$
|
565,492
|
|
|
$
|
539,334
|
|
|
$
|
572,922
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(466,401
|
)
|
|
|
(462,131
|
)
|
|
|
(436,814
|
)
|
|
|
(451,457
|
)
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
141,154
|
|
|
|
103,361
|
|
|
|
102,520
|
|
|
|
121,465
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
98,075
|
|
|
|
82,823
|
|
|
|
75,332
|
|
|
|
89,936
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
58,214
|
|
|
|
41,850
|
|
|
|
42,907
|
|
|
|
244,016
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(23,497
|
)
|
|
|
(28,941
|
)
|
|
|
(14,062
|
)
|
|
|
(77,170
|
)
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
34,717
|
|
|
|
12,909
|
|
|
|
28,845
|
|
|
|
166,846
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,925
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
37,642
|
|
|
|
15,118
|
|
|
|
28,170
|
|
|
|
166,799
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
.13
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
.10
|
|
|
|
.61
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
.13
|
|
|
|
.05
|
|
|
|
.10
|
|
|
|
.60
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
442,001
|
|
|
$
|
431,400
|
|
|
$
|
400,389
|
|
|
$
|
479,098
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(353,307
|
)
|
|
|
(347,212
|
)
|
|
|
(327,341
|
)
|
|
|
(374,767
|
)
|
Gross profits
|
|
|
88,694
|
|
|
|
84,188
|
|
|
|
73,048
|
|
|
|
104,331
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
62,177
|
|
|
|
60,385
|
|
|
|
21,342
|
|
|
|
52,774
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
42,422
|
|
|
|
40,761
|
|
|
|
7,603
|
|
|
|
6,663
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(15,645
|
)
|
|
|
(15,404
|
)
|
|
|
(4,797
|
)
|
|
|
(8,999
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
26,777
|
|
|
|
25,357
|
|
|
|
2,806
|
|
|
|
(2,336
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
3,106
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
26,926
|
|
|
|
25,450
|
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
Diluted EPS
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
.00
|
|
109
SERVICE
CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Three
Years Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Accounts(1)
|
|
|
Write-Offs(2)
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
25,793
|
|
|
$
|
11,489
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(17,816
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,475
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
11,835
|
|
|
|
10,020
|
|
|
|
12,060
|
|
|
|
(8,122
|
)
|
|
|
25,793
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
12,572
|
|
|
|
9,470
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(10,168
|
)
|
|
|
11,835
|
|
Due After One Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
3,844
|
|
|
$
|
(705
|
)
|
|
$
|
(314
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,825
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
|
|
(2,100
|
)
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
(1,818
|
)
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
33,362
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(25,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,312
|
|
Preneed Funeral and Preneed Cemetery Asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
81,572
|
|
|
$
|
(3,546
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,964
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,062
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
60,358
|
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
22,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,572
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
53,340
|
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
7,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,358
|
|
Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
(151,341
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,611
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(143,730
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
(112,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151,341
|
)
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
(112,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,002
|
)
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
70,547
|
|
|
$
|
8,034
|
|
|
$
|
(10,112
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,469
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
34,829
|
|
|
|
(3,033
|
)
|
|
|
38,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,547
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
43,908
|
|
|
|
(9,079
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,829
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Primarily relates to cumulative effect of accounting change and
acquisitions and dispositions of operations. |
|
(2) |
|
Uncollected receivables written off, net of recoveries. |
110
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
effective disclosure controls and procedures. As of
December 31, 2007, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)). Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) reports we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the
time period specified by the SECs rules and forms and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In light of the discussion of material weaknesses
set forth below, these officers have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of
December 31, 2007. To address the material weaknesses
described below, we performed additional analyses and other
post-closing procedures to ensure our consolidated financial
statements were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(US GAAP). These measures included, among other things:
(i) expansion of our normal year-end closing and testing
procedures, (ii) assignment of a dedicated team of
personnel to review all account reconciliations, including
reconciliations performed by our outsourced accounting
functions, and (iii) deployment of significant in-house and
external resources to complete our income tax provision and
various account reconciliations, ensure posting of all
transactions, and perform a detailed review and comprehensive
analysis of account balances and reconciliations. Based on the
additional procedures performed, management has determined that
the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
fairly present, in all material respects, our financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods
presented.
Managements
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of,
the companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, and effected by the board of directors, management,
and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with US
GAAP including those policies and procedures that:
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company,
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with US GAAP and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company, and
(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we have assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, our
management used the criteria described in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on this assessment and those criteria, our
management concluded that the Company did not
111
maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007 as a result of material weaknesses in
(a) accounting for income taxes and (b) account
reconciliations.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Companys annual or interim financial
statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Management identified the following material weaknesses as of
December 31, 2007.
Accounting
for Income Taxes:
As of December 31, 2007, we did not maintain effective
controls over the calculation of the completeness, accuracy, and
presentation of our accounting for income taxes, including the
tax provision and related tax assets and liabilities.
Specifically, our controls related to the determination and
review of our quarterly and annual tax provisions were not
adequate to ensure the timely and accurate preparation of the
income tax provision and related current and deferred tax asset
and liability accounts in accordance with US GAAP. This control
deficiency resulted in the fourth quarter 2007 revision of the
Companys adoption impact of FIN 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48) and various audit adjustments to the
consolidated financial statements in the second, third, and
fourth quarters of 2007. Additionally, this control deficiency,
if not corrected, could result in a material misstatement of the
income tax accounts that would result in a material misstatement
in our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that
would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Therefore,
we have concluded that this control deficiency constitutes a
material weakness.
Account
Reconciliations:
As of December 31, 2007, we did not maintain effective
controls over the timely completion and review of certain of our
balance sheet account reconciliations, including reconciliations
related to our outsourced accounting functions and accounts
acquired in our recent Alderwoods transaction. Specifically, our
controls related to the preparation and review of account
reconciliations related to certain trust accounts, cemetery
properties, leases, divested properties, merchandise inventory,
and sales and property taxes were not adequate to ensure the
accurate and complete presentation of these balance sheet and
related income statement accounts in accordance with US GAAP.
This control deficiency resulted in various adjustments,
including audit adjustments, to the consolidated financial
statements in the fourth quarter of 2007 which were not
material. Additionally, this control deficiency, if not
corrected, could result in a material misstatement to our annual
or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. Therefore, we have
concluded that this control deficiency constitutes a material
weakness.
The effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 has been
audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is
included herein.
Remediation
Efforts and Plans for Material Weaknesses in Internal Control
over Financial Reporting
In response to the identified material weaknesses, our
management, with oversight from the Companys Audit
Committee has dedicated significant in-house and external
resources to implement enhancements to the Companys
internal control over financial reporting and remediate the
material weaknesses described above. These ongoing efforts are
focused on (i) expanding our organizational capabilities to
improve our monitoring, communications, training, and governance
processes, (ii) implementing process improvements to
strengthen our internal control and monitoring activities, and
(iii) placement of additional staff to timely complete the
Companys income tax provision and account reconciliations,
thus allowing for proper review and oversight.
Until the remediation steps set forth below are fully
implemented, the material weaknesses described above will
continue to exist.
112
Accounting
for Income Taxes:
The principal factors contributing to the material weakness in
accounting for income taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Incorrect application of the provisions of
SFAS No. 109 and FIN 48 resulting in errors in
the accounting for income taxes;
|
|
|
|
Improper verification of data used in tax provision and tax
reserve computations; and
|
|
|
|
Insufficient or ineffective review and approval of income tax
schedules and journal entries resulting in errors not being
prevented or detected in a timely manner.
|
In response to these contributing factors, our management has
implemented or will implement the following remediation steps to
enhance our internal controls over the calculation of the
Companys income tax provision and related balance sheet
accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
The hiring of an experienced Managing Director in the first
quarter of 2008 to lead the Companys tax department, with
responsibility for direction and oversight of all income tax and
other tax functions.
|
|
|
|
The engagement of third party contract tax advisors in the
fourth quarter of 2007; such tax advisors have provided and will
continue to provide day-to-day oversight and review of the
Companys tax provision and compliance processes, pending
our Managing Directors assessment of resource requirements
and capabilities.
|
|
|
|
The commitment to reevaluate existing roles and responsibilities
within the tax function to ensure they are staffed by
appropriate personnel.
|
|
|
|
The enhancement of standardized documentation and processes in
the income tax provision area, including the review and approval
of related journal entries by experienced tax and finance
personnel.
|
Account
Reconciliations:
The principal factors contributing to the material weakness in
account reconciliations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inadequate policies and procedures in place to effectively
reconcile general ledger accounts to supporting detail;
|
|
|
|
High turnover within the accounting and finance function, which
led to the extensive use of contract and temporary resources to
prepare certain account reconciliations; and
|
|
|
|
Insufficient or ineffective review and approval of certain
account reconciliations resulting in errors not being prevented
or detected in a timely manner.
|
In response to these contributing factors, our management has
implemented or will implement the following remediation steps to
enhance our internal controls over the timely completion and
review of account reconciliations:
|
|
|
|
|
The creation of a monitoring function within the Companys
financial reporting group in the fourth quarter of 2007 to
periodically review all account reconciliations.
|
|
|
|
The hiring and training of additional in-house resources and
ongoing commitment to evaluate existing roles and
responsibilities within the accounting and finance function.
|
|
|
|
The performance of an effectiveness review of certain financial
processes and related controls to help evaluate the
Companys organizational structure and control environment;
such review will encompass processes, policies and procedures,
personnel, and technology.
|
|
|
|
The refinement of certain entity-level monitoring controls,
first implemented in the third quarter of 2007 to gain
visibility into material issues within business functions, in
order to achieve the level of precision and operating
effectiveness desired by our management.
|
113
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
Information required by PART III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13
and 14) has been omitted as we intend to file with the
Commission not later than 120 days after the end of our
fiscal year a definitive proxy statement that includes such
information. Such information is set forth in such proxy
statement (i) with respect to Item 10, under the
captions Proxy Voting: Questions and Answers,
Election of Directors, Other
Matters Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance and Report of the Audit
Committee, (ii) with respect to Items 11 and 13,
under the captions Election of Directors,
Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
Compensation Committee Report, Certain
Information with Respect to Officers and Directors,
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation and Certain Transactions,
(iii) with respect to Item 12, under the caption
Voting Securities and Principal Holders, and
(iv) with respect to Item 14, under the caption
Proposal to Approve the Selection of Independent
Accountants Audit Fees and All Other Fees. The
information as specified in the preceding sentence is
incorporated herein by reference; provided however,
notwithstanding anything set forth in this
Form 10-K,
the information under the captions Compensation Committee
Report and Report of the Audit Committee in
such proxy statement, is not incorporated by reference into this
Form 10-K.
The information regarding our executive officers called for by
Item 401 of
Regulation S-K
and the information regarding our code of ethics called for by
Item 406 of
Regulation S-K
has been included in PART I of this report. The information
regarding our equity compensation plan information called for by
Item 201(d) of
Regulation S-K
is set forth below.
Equity Compensation Plan Information at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
Issued upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
11,910,044
|
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
|
|
13,358,979
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
1,658,401
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
|
|
|
829,474
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,568,445
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
14,188,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes options outstanding under the Equity Corporation
International 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan which became
exercisable to acquire our common stock when we acquired Equity
Corporation International in January 1999. The outstanding
options cover an aggregate of 7,263 shares at a
weighted-average exercise price of $29.82 per share. No shares
of our common stock are available for any future grants under
this plan. |
|
|
|
Also includes options outstanding under the 1996 Nonqualified
Incentive Plan under which nonqualified stock options were
granted to employees who are not officers or directors. We have
1,651,138 total options outstanding under the 1996 Non-qualified
Incentive Plan. No shares of our common stock are available for
any future grants under this plan. See Note 4 to the
consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K
for a further description of 1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan.
These plans have not been submitted for shareholder approval. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes an estimated 829,474 shares available under the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Under such plan, a dollar value of
shares (not an amount of shares) are registered. The above
estimate was determined by dividing (i) the remaining
unissued dollar value of registered shares at December 31,
2007, which was $11.7 million, by (ii) the closing
price of $14.05 per share of common stock at December 31,
2007. |
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan enables Company employees in
North America to invest via payroll deductions up to $500 (or
$700 Canadian) per month in our common stock. Contributions are
utilized to purchase the stock in the open market. With respect
to Canadian employees who meet certain requirements, we will
provide annually a match equal to 25% of the amount of the
employees contribution subject to a maximum contribution
per participant of $2,100 Canadian. This plan has not been
submitted for shareholder approval.
Certifications
In 2007, the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange
the Section 12(a) certification by the Companys Chief
Executive Officer regarding compliance with the Exchanges
corporate governance listing standards. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Section 302 certifications regarding the quality of the
Companys public disclosure are attached as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this report on
Form 10-K.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedule
|
(a)(1)-(2) Financial Statements and Schedule:
The financial statements and schedule are listed in the
accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Related Schedule
on page 41 of this report.
(3) Exhibits:
The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index on
pages
118-121 are
filed as part of this report.
(b) Included in (a) above.
(c) Included in (a) above.
115
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant, Service
Corporation International, has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ gregory
t. sangalis
|
(Gregory T. Sangalis,
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel, and Secretary)
Dated: March 3, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ R.
L. WALTRIP*
(R.
L. Waltrip)
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THOMAS
L. RYAN*
(Thomas
L. Ryan)
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ERIC
D. TANZBERGER*
(Eric
D. Tanzberger)
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JEFFREY
I. BEASON*
(Jeffrey
I. Beason)
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller (Chief Accounting
Officer)
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ALAN
R. BUCKWALTER, III*
(Alan
R. Buckwalter, III)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ANTHONY
L. COELHO*
(Anthony
L. Coelho)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ A.
J. FOYT, JR.*
(A.
J. Foyt, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MALCOLM
GILLIS*
(Malcolm
Gillis)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ VICTOR
L. LUND*
(Victor
L. Lund)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
W. MECOM, JR.*
(John
W. Mecom, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ CLIFTON
H. MORRIS, JR.*
(Clifton
H. Morris, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ W.
BLAIR WALTRIP*
(W.
Blair Waltrip)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ EDWARD
E. WILLIAMS*
(Edward
E. Williams)
|
|
Director
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By
|
|
/s/ GREGORY
T. SANGALIS
(Gregory
T. Sangalis, as Attorney-In-Fact
For each of the Persons indicated)
|
|
|
|
March 3, 2008
|
117
EXHIBIT INDEX
PURSUANT
TO ITEM 601 OF REG. S-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement
No. 333-10867
on
Form S-3).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Articles of Amendment to Restated Articles of Incorporation.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1996).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Statement of Resolution Establishing Series of Shares of
Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock, dated
July 27, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1998).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Bylaws, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K
dated November 16, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of May 14, 1998 between the
Company and Harris Trust and Savings Bank. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
Form 8-K
dated May 14, 1998).
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Agreement Appointing a Successor Rights Agent Under Rights
Agreement, dated June 1, 1999, by the Company, Harris Trust
and Savings Bank and The Bank of New York. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1999).
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Senior Indenture dated as of February 1, 1993 by and
between the Company and The Bank of New York, as trustee.
(Incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to
Form S-4
filed September 2, 2004 (File
No. 333-118763)).
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Agreement of Resignation, Appointment of Acceptance, dated
October 21, 2005, among the Company, The Bank of New York
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., appointing a
successor trustee for the Senior Indenture dated as of
February 1, 1993. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan For Non-Employee Directors. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Retirement Plan For Non-Employee Directors.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Agreement dated May 14, 1992 between the Company, R. L.
Waltrip and related parties relating to life insurance.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1992).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated December 28, 2006, between SCI
Executive Services, Inc. and R.L. Waltrip (including
Non-Competition Agreement and Amendment to Employment Agreement,
dated November 11, 1991, among the Company, R. L. Waltrip
and Claire Waltrip). (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
R. L. Waltrip.
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1,
2004, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Thomas L. Ryan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
December 1, 2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Thomas L. Ryan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12
to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Thomas L. Ryan.
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1,
2004, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Michael R. Webb.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
December 1, 2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Michael R. Webb. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Michael R. Webb.
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 28,
2006 between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Eric D.
Tanzberger. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
Eric D. Tanzberger.
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1,
2004, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and James Shelger;
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated
December 1, 2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and
James M. Shelger. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
Executive Retirement and Consulting Agreement and General
Release, dated December 28, 2007, between SCI Executive
Services, Inc. and James M. Shelger. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K
dated January 2, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Form of Employment and Noncompetition Agreement pertaining to
non-senior officers. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003).
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
Form of Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement
pertaining to the preceding exhibit. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
Form of Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement
dated November 30, 2007, between SCI Executive Services,
Inc. and non-senior officers.
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Registration Statement
No. 333-00179
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated
February 12, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Option Plan, dated
November 13, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to
Form 10-K
for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Amended 1996 Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Appendix A to Proxy Statement dated April 6, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.36 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Senior Officers (as
Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 1998).
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for
Senior Officers. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000).
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan as Amended and Restated.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Registration
Statement
No. 333-119681).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, and
Third Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Director Fee Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Annex A to Proxy Statement dated
April 17, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
|
|
1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 to Registration Statement
No. 333-33101).
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan dated
November 13, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.2 to Registration Statement
No. 333-50084).
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan dated
November 11, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.3 Registration Statement
No. 333-50084).
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
|
|
Amendment to 1996 Nonqualified Incentive Plan dated
February 14, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.4 to Registration Statement
No. 333-67800).
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 to Registration Statement
No. 2-62484
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 15.1 to Registration
Statement
No. 2-62484
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28.3 to Registration
Statement
No. 33-25061
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 28.4 to Registration
Statement
No. 33-35708
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated December 21, 1993).
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10.31 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999).
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
|
|
Agreement between Merrill Lynch Canada Inc. and Service
Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 28.5 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement
No. 33-8907
on
Form S-8).
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement between Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.
and Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated December 21, 1993).
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan Administration Agreement dated
July 25, 2001 between Service Corporation International
(Canada) Limited and Fastrak Systems Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.48 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004).
|
|
10
|
.48
|
|
|
|
Form of Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.52 to
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.49
|
|
|
|
Form of amendment to Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
10
|
.50
|
|
|
|
Form of Performance Unit Grant Award Agreement. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to
Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.51
|
|
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated November 28, 2006 among
Service Corporation International and Purchasers identified
therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 28, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.52
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of
June 11, 2007, among the Company and the purchasers party
thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 8-K
dated June 20, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.53
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated November 28, 2006 among Service
Corporation International, the lenders party thereto, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
dated November 28, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.54
|
|
|
|
Agreement and First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of
June 14, 2007, among the Company and the lenders party
thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Form 8-K
dated June 20, 2007).
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP).
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Powers of Attorney.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Principal Executive Officer
in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial
Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as
Principal Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906
of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Eric D.
Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
In the above list, the management contracts or compensatory
plans or arrangements are set forth in Exhibits 10.1
through 10.50.
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of
Regulation S-K,
there are not filed as exhibits to this report certain
instruments with respect to long-term debt under which the total
amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed
10 percent of the total assets of Registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Registrant agrees to
furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Commission upon
request.
121