clorox_10q.htm
UNITED STATES SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
——————————
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2009. |
OR |
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 1-07151 |
————————— |
THE CLOROX
COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter) |
|
Delaware |
31-0595760 |
(State or
other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
1221
Broadway |
|
Oakland,
California |
94612-1888 |
(Address of
principal executive offices) |
(Zip
code) |
|
(510)
271-7000 |
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
|
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
since last report) |
——————————
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes þ
No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated
filer, ” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act (Check One):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer |
Non-accelerated filer |
Smaller Reporting
Company |
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes No þ
As of December 31, 2009, there were 140,239,949
shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock (par value - $1.00), the
registrant's only outstanding class of stock.
The Clorox Company
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Net sales |
$ |
1,279 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
$ |
2,651 |
|
$ |
2,600 |
Cost of products sold |
|
718 |
|
|
730 |
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
1,552 |
Gross profit |
|
561 |
|
|
486 |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,048 |
|
Selling and administrative
expenses |
|
187 |
|
|
172 |
|
|
362 |
|
|
356 |
Advertising costs |
|
127 |
|
|
107 |
|
|
254 |
|
|
226 |
Research and development costs |
|
29 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
54 |
Restructuring costs |
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
Interest expense |
|
37 |
|
|
44 |
|
|
73 |
|
|
86 |
Other expense, net |
|
16 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
7 |
Earnings before income taxes |
|
163 |
|
|
131 |
|
|
407 |
|
|
317 |
Income taxes |
|
53 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
140 |
|
|
103 |
Net earnings |
$ |
110 |
|
$ |
86 |
|
$ |
267 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$ |
0.78 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
1.89 |
|
$ |
1.53 |
Diluted |
$ |
0.77 |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (in
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
140,303 |
|
|
139,086 |
|
|
140,023 |
|
|
138,772 |
Diluted |
|
141,528 |
|
|
140,349 |
|
|
141,211 |
|
|
140,109 |
|
Dividend declared per
share |
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
$ |
0.92 |
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 3
|
12/31/2009 |
|
6/30/2009 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
423 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
409 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Other current assets |
|
117 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Total current assets |
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
937 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
Goodwill |
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
1,630 |
|
Trademarks, net |
|
559 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
98 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Other assets |
|
146 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
4,489 |
|
|
$ |
4,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(DEFICIT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and loans payable |
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
Current maturities of long-term
debt |
|
575 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
301 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
436 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
35 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Total current
liabilities |
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
2,435 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
626 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
29 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
4,462 |
|
|
|
4,751 |
|
Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $1.00 par value; 750,000,000
shares authorized; 158,741,461 shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009;
and 140,239,949 and 139,157,976 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding at December 31, 2009 and June
30, 2009, respectively |
|
159 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
576 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
753 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost: 18,501,512 and
19,583,485 shares at December 31, 2009 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009,
respectively |
|
(1,144 |
) |
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive net
losses |
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(347 |
) |
Stockholders’
equity (deficit) |
|
27 |
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
Total liabilities and stockholders’
equity (deficit) |
$ |
4,489 |
|
|
$ |
4,576 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 4
|
Six Months Ended |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
$
|
267 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile earnings from
operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
95 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
25 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
5 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Other |
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
66 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
- |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Net cash provided by operations |
|
246 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Other |
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and loans payable |
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
Long-term debt borrowings, net of issuance
costs |
|
297 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Long-term debt repayments |
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
Issuance of common stock for employee stock
plans and other |
|
31 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Net cash used for financing
activities |
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents |
|
2 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
206 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
End of year |
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
See Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 5
NOTE 1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated results of operations,
financial position and cash flows of The Clorox Company and its subsidiaries
(the Company) for the periods presented. Certain prior period amounts have been
reclassified in the condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to
the current period presentation. The results for the interim period ended
December 31, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, or for any future period. The
Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements were evaluated for
subsequent events after the balance sheet date through February 5, 2010, the
date the consolidated financial statements were issued.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been omitted or
condensed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). The information in this report should be read in
conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, which includes a complete set of footnote
disclosures, including the Company’s significant accounting policies.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could
differ materially from estimates and assumptions made.
Foreign Currency Translation
Prior to December 31, 2009, the Company translated its Venezuelan
subsidiary’s financial statements using Venezuela’s official exchange rate,
which had been fixed by the Venezuelan government at 2.15 Bolivar Fuertes (VEF)
to the U.S. dollar. However, the Company’s access to the official exchange rate
has become increasingly limited
due to delays in obtaining U.S. dollars through the government sponsored
currency exchange process at the official exchange rate and the removal of some
products from the official list of items that may be imported at the official
exchange rate. This has led to the substantial use of the parallel market
currency exchange rate to convert VEFs to U.S. dollars to pay for certain
imported inventory purchases. The parallel market currency exchange rate
represents the rates negotiated with local financial intermediaries. Due to
these circumstances, effective December 31, 2009, the Company began translating
its Venezuelan subsidiary’s financial statements using the parallel market
currency exchange rate, the rate at which the Company expects to be able to
remit dividends or return capital. The rate used at December 31, 2009, was 5.87
VEF to the U.S. dollar. On a pre-tax basis, the translation resulted in a
remeasurement loss of $12.
During the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, net sales in
Venezuela were approximately 3% of total Company net sales. As of December 31,
2009, total assets in Venezuela were approximately 1% of total Company assets.
Effective January 1, 2010, according to U.S. GAAP, Venezuela has been
designated as a hyper-inflationary economy. A hyper-inflationary economy
designation occurs when a country has experienced cumulative inflation of
approximately 100 percent or more over a 3 year period. The hyper-inflationary designation requires
the local subsidiary in Venezuela to record all transactions as if they were
denominated in U.S. dollars. Bolivar denominated monetary assets will be
remeasured at the parallel market currency rate and will be recognized in
earnings rather than in currency translation adjustment on the balance
sheet.
Page 6
NOTE 1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
New Accounting Pronouncements
Recently adopted pronouncements
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which provides that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities that
must be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the
two-class method. These payment awards were previously not considered
participating securities. Accordingly, the Company’s unvested performance units,
restricted stock awards and restricted stock units that provide such
nonforfeitable rights are now considered participating securities in the
calculation of net earnings per share (EPS). The Company’s share-based payment
awards granted in fiscal year 2010 are not participating securities. The new
standard requires the retrospective adjustment of the Company’s earnings per
share data. The impact of the retrospective adoption of the new accounting
standard on the fiscal year 2009 reported EPS data was as follows:
|
Basic |
|
Diluted |
|
As previously |
|
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
|
reported |
|
As restated |
|
reported |
|
As restated |
Three months ended December 31,
2008 |
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.61 |
Six months ended December 31, 2008 |
|
1.55 |
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
1.51 |
|
Three months ended March 31,
2009 |
|
1.09 |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
1.08 |
Nine months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
2.64 |
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
2.59 |
|
Three months ended June 30,
2009 |
|
1.22 |
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
1.20 |
Year ended June 30, 2009 |
|
3.86 |
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
3.79 |
The calculation of EPS
under the new accounting standard is disclosed in Note 7.
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,
including contingent liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquired
business. The new accounting standard also provides for recognizing and
measuring the goodwill acquired in a business combination and requires
disclosure of information to enable users of the financial statements to
evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The
adoption of the new accounting standard had no impact on the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which establishes new accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously
referred to as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
The new standard establishes accounting and reporting standards that require the
noncontrolling interest to be reported as a component of equity. Changes in a
parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest
will be accounted for as equity transactions and any retained noncontrolling
equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary will be initially
measured at fair value. The adoption of the new accounting standard had no
material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Page 7
NOTE 1. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which requires disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments in interim financial information (See Note 3).
The Company already complies with the provisions of this accounting standard for
its annual reporting.
On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of the accounting
standard on fair value measurements that apply to nonfinancial assets and
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a non-recurring
basis. The adoption of these provisions did not have an impact on the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
On September 30, 2009,
the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (the Codification). The Codification is the single
official source of authoritative U.S. GAAP (other than the SEC’s views),
superseding all other accounting literature except that issued by the SEC. The
adoption of the Codification had no impact on the condensed consolidated balance
sheets, statements of operations or cash flows.
Pronouncements to be adopted
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard that will
require additional disclosures about the major categories of plan assets and
concentrations of risk for an employer’s plan assets of a defined benefit
pension or other postretirement plan, as well as disclosure of fair value
levels, similar to the disclosure requirements of the fair value measurements
accounting standard. This standard is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009, with early application permitted. The Company will provide
these enhanced disclosures about plan assets in its 2010 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
In January 2010, the
FASB issued an accounting standard update (ASU) to Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies existing
disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. Specifically, the Company
will be required to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in
and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to also describe the
reasons for the transfers. This ASU is applicable for the Company beginning in
its fiscal 2010 third quarter. The Company does not expect the adoption of this
ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
disclosures.
NOTE 2. RESTRUCTURING
In fiscal year 2008, the
Company began a restructuring plan that involves simplifying its supply chain
and other restructuring activities (Supply Chain and Other restructuring plan),
which was subsequently expanded to include additional costs, primarily
severance, associated with the Company’s plan to reduce certain staffing levels.
The Company anticipates the Supply Chain and Other restructuring plan will be
completed in fiscal year 2012.
The following table
summarizes restructuring costs associated with the Company’s Supply Chain and
Other restructuring plan by affected reportable segment, with unallocated
amounts set forth in Corporate:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Cleaning |
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
Corporate |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
Total Company |
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Page 8
NOTE 2. RESTRUCTURING (Continued)
For the three months
ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized in cost of products sold
restructuring-related costs associated with the Supply Chain and Other
restructuring plan of $4. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, the
Company recognized restructuring-related costs associated with the Supply Chain
and Other restructuring plan of $1 and $7, included in selling and
administrative expenses and cost of products sold, respectively.
For the three and six
months ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized in cost of products sold
restructuring-related costs associated with the Supply Chain and Other
restructuring plan of $2 and $7, respectively.
The following table
summarizes restructuring-related costs associated with the Company’s Supply
Chain and Other restructuring plan by affected reportable segment, with
unallocated amounts set forth in Corporate:
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Cleaning |
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
3 |
Household |
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
International |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
Corporate |
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
Total Company |
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
Total costs associated
with the Supply Chain and Other restructuring plan since inception through
December 31, 2009, were $110, of which $34, $43, $12 and $21 related to the
Cleaning, Household, International segments and Corporate, respectively.
The Company anticipates
incurring approximately $18 to $25 of Supply Chain and Other
restructuring-related charges in fiscal year 2010, of which approximately $2 are
expected to be noncash related. The Company anticipates approximately $5 to $8
of the fiscal year 2010 charges to be in Corporate and $9 to $11 to be in the
Cleaning segment, of which approximately $7 to $9 are expected to be recognized
as cost of products sold charges. The remaining estimated charges of $4 to $6
are expected to be recognized as cost of products sold in the Household segment.
The total anticipated charges related to the Supply Chain and Other
restructuring plan for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 are estimated to be
approximately $10 to $12.
Page
9
NOTE 2. RESTRUCTURING (Continued)
The following table
reconciles the accrual for the Supply Chain and Other restructuring charges
discussed above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
Depreciation |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Accrual Balance as of June 30,
2009 |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Charges |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Charges
against assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Accrual Balance as of September 30,
2009 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Charges |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Charges
against assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Accrual Balance as of December 31,
2009 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
|
|
The Company may, from
time to time, decide to pursue additional restructuring-related initiatives that
involve charges in future periods.
NOTE 3. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS
The Company is exposed
to certain commodity and foreign currency risks relating to its ongoing business
operations. The Company uses commodity futures and fixed price swap contracts to
fix the price of a portion of its forecasted raw material requirements. Contract
maturities, which are generally no longer than 18 months, are matched to the
length of the raw material purchase contracts. The Company also enters into
certain foreign currency related derivative contracts to manage a portion of the
Company’s foreign exchange risk associated with the purchase of inventory. These
foreign currency contracts generally have durations no longer than 12 months.
The accounting for
changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument
depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as a hedge, and on the
type of the hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments designated
and qualifying as hedging instruments, the Company must designate the hedging
instrument as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. The Company designates as
cash flow hedges, commodity forward and future contracts of forecasted purchases
for raw materials and foreign currency forward contracts of forecasted purchases
of inventory. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, the
Company had no hedging instruments designated as a fair value hedge.
For derivative
instruments designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of
other comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The
estimated amount of the existing net gain at the reporting date expected to be
reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is $3. Gains and losses on
the derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge
components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in
current earnings. During the three and six month periods ended December 31,
2009, the hedge ineffectiveness was not material.
Page
10
NOTE 3. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
The Company’s derivative
financial instruments designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair
value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
Balance Sheet location |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
6/30/2009 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity purchase contracts |
|
Other current assets |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
Commodity purchase contracts |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(21 |
) |
|
The effects of
derivative instruments on OCI and on the statement of earnings were as follows:
|
|
Three months ended
12/31/2009 |
|
Six months ended
12/31/2009 |
Cash flow hedges |
|
Gain recognized in
OCI |
|
Loss reclassified from OCI
and recognized in earnings |
|
Gain (Loss) recognized
in OCI |
|
Loss reclassified from OCI
and recognized in earnings |
Commodity purchase contracts |
|
$ |
|
12 |
|
$ |
|
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
|
(17 |
) |
Foreign
exchange contracts |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
|
12 |
|
$ |
|
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
|
(19 |
) |
|
The losses reclassified
from OCI and recognized in earnings during the three and six month periods ended
December 31, 2009, are included in cost of products sold.
As of December 31, 2009,
the net notional value of commodity derivatives was $83, of which $52 related to
diesel fuel, $16 related to jet fuel, $13 related to soybean oil and $2 related
to unleaded gas.
As of December 31, 2009,
the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge
forecasted purchases of inventory of $36 and $8 related to its subsidiaries in
Canada and Australia, respectively.
Page
11
NOTE 3. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
MEASUREMENTS (Continued)
Certain terms of the
agreements governing the Company’s over-the-counter derivative instruments
require the Company or the counterparty to post collateral when the fair value
of the derivative instruments exceeds contractually defined counterparty
liability position limits. There was no collateral posted at December 31, 2009.
Certain terms of the
agreements governing the over-the-counter derivative instruments contain
provisions that require the credit ratings, as assigned by Standard and Poor’s
and Moody’s to the Company and its counterparties, to remain at a level equal to
or better than the minimum of an investment grade credit rating. As of December
31, 2009, the Company and each of its counterparties maintained investment grade
ratings with both Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s.
U.S. GAAP prioritizes
the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Quoted market
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable
market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market
data.
Level 3: Unobservable
inputs reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
At December 31, 2009,
the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value
on a recurring basis during the year were level 2 commodity purchase contracts
with a fair value of $7 (included in other current assets), and commodity
purchase and foreign exchange contracts with a fair value of $3 and $1,
respectively, (included in accrued liabilities).
Commodity purchase
contracts are fair valued using market quotations obtained off of the New York
Mercantile Exchange.
The foreign exchange
contracts are fair valued using foreign exchange rates and forward points quoted
by foreign exchange dealers.
The carrying values of
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes and
loans payable approximate their fair values at December 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009, due to the short maturity and nature of those balances. The estimated fair
value of long-term debt, including current maturities, was $3,155 and $2,816 at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The Company accounts for its
long-term debt at face value, net of any unamortized discounts or premiums. The
fair value of long-term debt was determined using secondary market prices quoted
by corporate bond dealers.
NOTE 4. INVENTORIES, NET
Inventories, net,
consisted of the following at:
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
6/30/2009 |
Finished goods |
|
$ |
342 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
Raw
materials and packaging |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
LIFO
allowances |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Allowances for obsolescence |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
Page
12
NOTE 5. OTHER LIABILITIES
Other liabilities
consisted of the following at:
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
6/30/2009 |
Venture agreement net terminal
obligation |
|
$ |
271 |
|
$ |
269 |
Employee benefit obligations |
|
|
245 |
|
|
266 |
Taxes |
|
|
71 |
|
|
65 |
Other |
|
|
39 |
|
|
40 |
Total |
|
$ |
626 |
|
$ |
640 |
|
NOTE 6. DEBT
In November 2009, the
Company issued $300 of long-term debt in senior notes. The notes carry an annual
fixed interest rate of 3.55% payable semi-annually in May and November. The
notes mature on November 1, 2015. Proceeds from the notes were used to retire
commercial paper. The notes rank equally with all of the Company’s existing and
future senior indebtedness.
NOTE 7. NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company computes EPS
using the two-class method (See Note 1), which is an earnings allocation formula
that determines EPS for common stock and participating securities.
EPS for common stock is
computed by dividing net earnings applicable to common stock by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding each period on an unrounded basis.
Net earnings applicable to common stock includes dividends paid to common
shareholders during the period plus a proportionate share of undistributed net
earnings which is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock
and participating securities outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS for common
stock reflects the earnings dilution that could occur from common shares that
may be issued through stock options, restricted stock awards, performance units
and restricted stock units, that are not participating securities. Excluded from
this calculation are amounts allocated to participating securities.
The following are
reconciliations of net earnings to net earnings applicable to common stock, and
the number of common shares outstanding (in thousands) used to calculate basic
EPS to those used to calculate diluted EPS:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Net earnings |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
Less:
Earnings allocated to participating securities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net earnings applicable to common
stock |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
Page
13
NOTE 7. NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
(Continued)
|
Weighted Average Number
of |
|
Weighted Average Number
of |
|
Shares Outstanding for
the |
|
Shares Outstanding for
the |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Basic |
140,303 |
|
139,086 |
|
140,023 |
|
138,772 |
Dilutive effect of stock options and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(excludes participating
securities) |
1,225 |
|
1,263 |
|
1,188 |
|
1,337 |
Diluted |
141,528 |
|
140,349 |
|
141,211 |
|
140,109
|
|
During the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009, the Company did not include stock options to
purchase 4,126 thousand and 4,150 thousand shares, respectively, of the
Company’s common stock, in the calculations of diluted EPS because their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
During the three and six
months ended December 31, 2008, the Company did not include stock options to
purchase 5,000 thousand of the Company’s common stock, in the calculations of
diluted EPS because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
During the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 450 thousand and 1,312
thousand shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock.
During the three and six
months ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 325 thousand and 1,180
thousand shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock.
The Company did not
repurchase any shares during the three and six months ended December 31, 2009
and 2008.
NOTE 8. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS)
Comprehensive income
(loss) includes net earnings and certain adjustments that are excluded from net
earnings, but included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity
(deficit), net of tax. Comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Net earnings |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
$ |
214 |
|
Other
comprehensive gains (losses), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency
translation |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
(120 |
) |
Net derivative
adjustments |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Pension and
postretirement benefit adjustments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
Total
comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
297 |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
Page
14
NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES
In determining its
quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual
effective tax rate, which is based on expected annual income, statutory tax
rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in
which the Company operates. Certain significant or unusual items are separately
recognized in the quarter in which they occur and can be a source of variability
in the effective tax rates from quarter to quarter.
As of December 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $86 and
$98, respectively, of which $86 and $91, respectively, would reduce income tax
expense and the effective tax rate if recognized.
The Company recognizes
interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of
income tax expense. As of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, the total balance
of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was $20 and
$17, respectively. Interest and penalties included in income tax expense were $2
and $5 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, and $1 and $(1) for
the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
The Company files income
tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state, local and foreign
jurisdictions. Certain issues relating to 2003, 2004 and 2006 are under review
by the IRS Appeals Division. The Company made payments of tax and interest to
the IRS related to fiscal years 2004 and 2006 in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010 of $8. No tax benefits had previously been recognized for these
payments. Various income tax returns in state and foreign jurisdictions are
currently in the process of examination.
In the twelve months
succeeding December 31, 2009, audit resolutions could potentially reduce total
unrecognized tax benefits by up to $26, primarily as a result of cash settlement
payments. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are subject to
significant uncertainty.
NOTE 10. RETIREMENT INCOME AND HEALTH CARE
BENEFIT PLANS
The following table
summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s
retirement income and health care plans:
|
|
Retirement Income Plans for
the |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Components of net periodic benefit cost
(income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Expected return on plan
assets |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Amortization of
unrecognized items |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total
net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
Page
15
NOTE 10. RETIREMENT INCOME AND HEALTH CARE
BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)
|
|
Health Care Plans for
the |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Components of net periodic benefit cost
(income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Amortization of
unrecognized items |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total net periodic benefit
cost |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
During its first quarter
of fiscal year 2010, the Company made a $33 discretionary contribution to the
U.S. pension plan. Based on current pension funding rules, the Company is not
required to make any contributions in fiscal year 2010.
NOTE 11. CONTINGENCIES
The Company is involved
in certain environmental matters, including Superfund and other response actions
at various locations. The Company has a recorded liability of $18 and $19 at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, for its share of the related
aggregate future remediation cost. One matter in Dickinson County, Michigan, for
which the Company is jointly and severally liable, accounts for a substantial
majority of the recorded liability at both December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
The Company is subject to a cost-sharing arrangement with Ford Motor Co. (Ford)
for this matter, under which the Company has agreed to be liable for 24.3% of
the aggregate remediation and associated costs, other than legal fees, as the
Company and Ford are each responsible for their own such fees. If Ford is unable
to pay its share of the response and remediation obligations, the Company would
likely be responsible for such obligations. In October 2004, the Company and
Ford agreed to a consent judgment with the Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality, which sets forth certain remediation goals and monitoring activities.
Based on the current status of this matter, and with the assistance of
environmental consultants, the Company maintains an undiscounted liability
representing its best estimate of its share of costs associated with the capital
expenditures, maintenance and other costs to be incurred over an estimated
30-year remediation period. The most significant components of the liability
relate to the estimated costs associated with the remediation of groundwater
contamination and excess levels of subterranean methane deposits. The Company
made payments of less than $1 during each of the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, towards remediation efforts. Currently, the Company
cannot accurately predict the timing of the payments that will likely be made
under this estimated obligation. In addition, the Company’s estimated loss
exposure is sensitive to a variety of uncertain factors, including the efficacy
of remediation efforts, changes in remediation requirements and the timing,
varying costs and alternative clean-up technologies that may become available in
the future. Although it is possible that the Company’s exposure may exceed the
amount recorded, any amount of such additional exposures, or range of exposures,
is not estimable at this time.
The Company is subject
to various other lawsuits and claims relating to issues such as contract
disputes, product liability, patents and trademarks, advertising, employee and
other matters. Although the results of claims and litigation cannot be predicted
with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of
these matters, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a
material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
Page
16
NOTE 12. SEGMENT RESULTS
The Company operates
through strategic business units which are aggregated into four reportable
segments: Cleaning, Household, Lifestyle and International. The four reportable
segments consist of the following:
- Cleaning consists of laundry,
home-care, professional products and auto-care products marketed and sold in
the United States. Products within this segment include laundry additives,
including bleaches, under the Clorox® and Clorox 2® brands; home-care
products, primarily under the Clorox®, Formula 409®, Liquid-Plumr®, Pine-Sol®, S.O.S® and Tilex® brands; natural
cleaning and laundry products under the Green Works™ brand; and auto-care
products primarily under the Armor All® and STP®
brands.
- Household consists of charcoal,
cat litter and plastic bags, wraps and container products marketed and sold in
the United States. Products within this segment include plastic bags, wraps
and containers, under the Glad® brand; cat litter
products, under the Fresh Step®, Scoop Away® and Ever Clean® brands; and charcoal
products under the Kingsford® and Match Light®
brands.
- Lifestyle consists of food
products and water-filtration systems and filters marketed and sold in the
United States and all natural personal care products. Products within this
segment include dressings and sauces, primarily under the Hidden Valley® and K C
Masterpiece®
brands, water-filtration systems and filters under the Brita® brand; and all
natural personal care products under the Burt’s Bees®
brand.
- International consists of products
sold outside the United States, excluding natural personal care products.
Corporate includes
certain nonallocated administrative costs, interest income, interest expense and
certain other nonoperating income and expenses. Corporate assets include cash
and cash equivalents, the Company’s headquarters and research and development
facilities, information systems hardware and software, pension balances, and
other investments.
The table below presents
reportable segment information and a reconciliation of the segment information
to the Company’s net sales and earnings before income taxes, with amounts that
are not allocated to the operating segments shown as Corporate.
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Cleaning |
|
$ |
424 |
|
$ |
413 |
|
$ |
927 |
|
$ |
900 |
Household |
|
|
334 |
|
|
354 |
|
|
715 |
|
|
781 |
Lifestyle |
|
|
212 |
|
|
193 |
|
|
412 |
|
|
387 |
International |
|
|
309 |
|
|
256 |
|
|
597 |
|
|
532 |
Corporate |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Total
Company |
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
$ |
2,651 |
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
Page
17
NOTE 12.
SEGMENT RESULTS (Continued)
|
|
Earnings
(Losses) |
|
|
Before Income Taxes |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Cleaning |
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
Household |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Lifestyle |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
International |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
Total
Company |
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
407 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
All intersegment sales
are eliminated and are not included in the Company’s reportable segments’ net
sales.
Net sales to the
Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, were 26%
of consolidated net sales for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009
and 2008.
NOTE 13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January 2010, the Company acquired the assets of Caltech Industries, a
company which provides disinfectants for the health care industry, for an
aggregate price of $23, with the objective of expanding the Company’s
capabilities in the areas of health and wellness. In connection with the
purchase, the Company acquired Caltech Industries’ facility and its employees.
The transaction was structured as an all cash acquisition.
Page
18
Overview
The Clorox Company (the
Company or Clorox) is a leading manufacturer and marketer of consumer products.
The Company sells its products primarily through mass merchandisers, grocery
stores and other retail outlets. Clorox markets some of consumers’ most trusted
and recognized brand names, including its namesake bleach and cleaning products,
Green Works ™
natural cleaners and laundry products, Poett® and Mistolín® cleaning products,
Armor All® and
STP® auto-care
products, Fresh Step® and Scoop Away® cat litter,
Kingsford®
charcoal, Hidden Valley® and K C
Masterpiece®
dressings and sauces, Brita® water-filtration
systems, Glad®
bags, wraps and containers, and Burt’s Bees® natural personal care
products. With approximately 8,300 employees worldwide, the Company manufactures
products in more than two dozen countries and markets them in more than 100
countries.
The Company operates
through strategic business units which are aggregated into four reportable
segments: Cleaning, Household,
Lifestyle and International. The four reportable segments consist of the
following:
- Cleaning consists of laundry,
home-care, professional products and auto-care products marketed and sold in
the United States. Products within this segment include laundry additives,
including bleaches, under the Clorox® and Clorox 2® brands; home-care
products, primarily under the Clorox®, Formula 409®, Liquid-Plumr®, Pine-Sol®, S.O.S® and Tilex® brands; natural
cleaning and laundry products under the Green Works™ brand; and auto-care
products primarily under the Armor All® and STP®
brands.
- Household consists of charcoal,
cat litter and plastic bags, wraps and container products marketed and sold in
the United States. Products within this segment include plastic bags, wraps
and containers, under the Glad® brand; cat litter
products, under the Fresh Step®, Scoop Away® and Ever Clean® brands; and charcoal
products under the Kingsford® and Match Light®
brands.
- Lifestyle consists of food
products and water-filtration systems and filters marketed and sold in the
United States and all natural personal care products. Products within this
segment include dressings and sauces, primarily under the Hidden Valley® and K C
Masterpiece®
brands, water-filtration systems and filters under the Brita® brand; and all
natural personal care products under the Burt’s Bees®
brand.
- International consists of products
sold outside the United States, excluding natural personal care
products.
Corporate includes
certain nonallocated administrative costs, interest income, interest expense and
certain other nonoperating income and expenses. Corporate assets include cash
and cash equivalents, the Company’s headquarters and research and development
facilities, information systems hardware and software, pension balances, and
other investments.
The Company primarily
markets its leading brands in midsized categories considered to have attractive
economic profit potential. Most of the Company’s products compete with other
nationally-advertised brands within each category and with “private-label”
brands.
Page
19
The Company reported net
earnings of $110 and $267 and diluted net earnings per share of $0.77 and $1.88
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, respectively. This
compares to net earnings of $86 and $214 and diluted net earnings per share of
$0.61 and $1.51 for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008,
respectively. Restructuring-related charges were $0.03 and $0.06 per diluted
share for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009, respectively, and
$0.01 and $0.04 per diluted share for the three and six months ended December
31, 2008, respectively (See “Restructuring costs” below). The impact of foreign
currency losses was $0.09 and $0.13 per diluted share for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009, respectively, and $0.01 and $0.02 per diluted
share for the three and six months ended December 31, 2008, of, respectively.
The foreign currency losses during the three months ended December 31, 2009,
include $0.06 per diluted share in currency translation losses for the
remeasurement of U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities in Venezuela
(See “Operating Activities” below).
The following discussion
of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2009, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
August 25, 2009, and the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
and related notes contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Results of Operations
Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of the Results of Operations, unless otherwise noted, compares the
three and six months ended December 31, 2009 (the current periods), to the three
and six months ended December 31, 2008 (the prior periods), using percentages
calculated on a rounded basis, except as noted.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales |
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
5 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
561 |
|
|
486 |
|
15 |
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
Selling
and administrative expenses |
|
|
187 |
|
|
172 |
|
9 |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
14.1 |
|
Advertising costs |
|
|
127 |
|
|
107 |
|
19 |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
8.8 |
|
Research and development costs |
|
|
29 |
|
|
27 |
|
7 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
% of Net Sales |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales |
|
$ |
2,651 |
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
2 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
|
100.0 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
1,048 |
|
13 |
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
40.3 |
|
Selling
and administrative expenses |
|
|
362 |
|
|
356 |
|
2 |
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
13.7 |
|
Advertising costs |
|
|
254 |
|
|
226 |
|
12 |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
8.7 |
|
Research and development costs |
|
|
56 |
|
|
54 |
|
4 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
Diluted net earnings per share increased $0.16 and $0.37 in the current
periods, respectively, compared to the prior periods primarily due to favorable
commodity costs, cost savings, price increases, and lower interest expense.
These increases were partially offset by increased advertising costs,
unfavorable product mix, increased manufacturing and logistics costs and
increased foreign currency losses attributable to the Company’s operations in
Venezuela (See “Operating Activities” below).
Page 20
Net sales
and volume increased in the current periods as compared to the prior periods.
Volume growth of 5% for the current quarter was primarily driven by
increased shipments of disinfecting products due to the H1N1 flu pandemic. Also
contributing to the increase in shipments were Brita® water-filtration
products. Partially offsetting these volume increases were lower shipments of
Glad® products
primarily due to competitive activity in the trash bag category.
Volume growth of 3%
during the six months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by increased
shipments of disinfecting products due to the H1N1 flu pandemic. Also
contributing to the increase were higher shipments of Hidden Valley® salad dressing and
Brita®
water-filtration products. Partially offsetting these volume increases were
lower shipments of Glad® products primarily due
to competitive activity in the trash bag category and the exit from a
private-label food bags business.
Gross profit
increased in the current periods as compared to the prior periods. Gross margin
expansion in the current quarter reflects approximately 300 basis points due to
favorable commodity costs, 160 basis points from cost savings and 80 basis
points from pricing. These factors were partially offset by 80 basis points and
60 basis points from increased manufacturing and logistics costs and trade
promotion spending, respectively.
Gross margin expansion
for the six months ended December 31, 2009, reflects approximately 270 basis
points due to favorable commodity costs, 160 basis points from cost savings and
130 basis points from pricing. These factors were partially offset by
approximately 60 basis points from increased manufacturing and logistics
costs.
Selling and administrative expenses increased in the current periods as compared
to the prior periods, primarily due to higher legal costs partially offset
primarily by lower consulting spending and lower incentive compensation accruals
in the prior period.
Advertising costs increased in the current periods as compared to the prior periods. The
increase for the current periods was primarily due to higher spending to support
new product launches for International and Burt’s Bees® natural personal care
products, continued support of Hidden Valley® and higher spending to
support Glad®
premium trash bags. Also contributing to the increase in the six months ended
December 31, 2009, was higher spending to support the new product launch for
Green Works™
natural laundry detergent.
Research and development costs remained relatively unchanged in comparison
to the prior periods as the Company continues to support its new products and
established brands.
Restructuring costs in the current and prior periods relate to the Company’s Supply Chain
and Other restructuring initiative. In fiscal year 2008, the Company began a
restructuring plan that involves simplifying its supply chain and other
restructuring activities (Supply Chain and Other restructuring plan), which was
subsequently expanded to include additional costs, primarily severance,
associated with the Company’s plan to reduce certain staffing levels. The
Company anticipates the Supply Chain restructuring will be completed in fiscal
year 2012.
Page 21
The following table
summarizes restructuring costs associated with the Company’s Supply Chain and
Other restructuring plan by affected reportable segment, with unallocated
amounts set forth in Corporate:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Cleaning |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
2 |
Corporate |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
Total
Company |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
For the three months
ended December 31, 2009, the Company recognized in cost of products sold
restructuring-related costs associated with the Supply Chain and Other
restructuring plan of $4. For the six months ended December 31, 2009, the
Company recognized restructuring-related costs associated with the Supply Chain
and Other restructuring plan of $1 and $7, included in selling and
administrative expenses and cost of products sold,
respectively.
For the three and six
months ended December 31, 2008, the Company recognized in cost of products sold
restructuring-related costs associated with the Supply Chain and Other
restructuring plan of $2 and $7, respectively.
The following table
summarizes restructuring-related costs associated with the Company’s Supply
Chain and Other restructuring plan by affected reportable segment, with
unallocated amounts set forth in Corporate:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
Cleaning |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
3 |
Household |
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
International |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
Corporate |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
Total
Company |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
Total costs associated
with the Supply Chain and Other restructuring plan since inception through
December 31, 2009, were $110, of which $34, $43, $12 and $21 related to the
Cleaning, Household, International segments and Corporate, respectively.
The Company anticipates
incurring approximately $18 to $25 of Supply Chain and Other
restructuring-related charges in fiscal year 2010, of which approximately $2 are
expected to be noncash related. The Company anticipates approximately $5 to $8
of the fiscal year 2010 charges to be in Corporate and $9 to $11 to be in the
Cleaning segment, of which approximately $7 to $9 are expected to be recognized
as cost of products sold charges. The remaining estimated charges of $4 to $6
are expected to be recognized as cost of products sold in the Household segment.
The total anticipated charges related to the Supply Chain and Other
restructuring plan for the fiscal years 2011 and 2012 are estimated to be
approximately $10 to $12.
Page 22
The following table
reconciles the accrual for the Supply Chain and Other restructuring charges
discussed above:
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severence |
|
Depreciation |
|
Other |
|
Total |
Accrual Balance as of June 30,
2009 |
|
$
|
15 |
|
|
$
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Charges |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Charges
against assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Accrual Balance as of September 30,
2009 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Charges |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Charges
against assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Accrual Balance as of December 31,
2009 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
The Company may, from time to time, decide to
pursue additional restructuring-related initiatives that involve charges in
future periods.
Interest expense decreased by $7 and $13, respectively, in the current periods, primarily
due to a decline in average debt balances and a lower weighted average interest
rate for total debt.
Other expense, net increased $12 and $17, respectively, in the current periods, primarily
from translating the Venezuelan subsidiary’s financial statements using the
parallel exchange rate. The translation resulted in a remeasurement loss of $12
(See “Operating Activities” below).
The effective tax rate was 32.7% and 34.4% for the current periods,
respectively, as compared to 33.9% and 32.5% for the prior periods,
respectively, on an unrounded basis. The lower rate in the current quarter was
primarily due to lower foreign tax expense, partially offset by higher valuation
allowances in the current quarter and favorable tax settlements in the year-ago
period. The lower rate in the prior year-to-date period was primarily the result
of favorable tax settlements in the prior period.
SEGMENT RESULTS
The following presents
the results of operations from the Company’s reportable segments excluding
certain unallocated costs included in Corporate:
CLEANING
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
424 |
|
$ |
413 |
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
927 |
|
$ |
900 |
|
3 |
% |
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
85 |
|
|
78 |
|
9 |
% |
|
|
222 |
|
|
193 |
|
15 |
% |
Page 23
Net sales, volume and earnings
before income taxes increased in the current periods as compared to the year-ago
periods. Volume growth of 8% in the current quarter and 6% during the six months
ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by increased shipments of
disinfecting products to meet demand associated with the H1N1 flu pandemic and
increased shipments of Clorox® toilet bathroom
cleaners. During the current quarter there were also increased shipments of
Armor All®
auto-care products, partially offset by lower shipments of Tilex®. During the six months
ended December 31, 2009, the volume increases were partially offset by category
softness in the auto category.
Volume growth outpaced
net sales growth in both periods primarily due to unfavorable product mix
(approximately 330 basis points and 200 basis points, respectively) and higher
trade-promotion spending (approximately 200 basis points and 100 basis points,
respectively).
The increase in earnings
before income taxes in both periods was primarily due to higher net sales and
lower commodity costs of $13 and $22, primarily resin, and cost savings of $6
and $14, respectively, including more efficient sourcing of raw materials and
transportation costs, the implementation of cost-effective packaging, including
a concentrated formulation of Clorox 2® stain fighter and
color booster and packaging simplification. During the six months ended December
31, 2009, the increase in earnings before income taxes also reflects the benefit
of price increases of $7.
HOUSEHOLD
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
334 |
|
$ |
354 |
|
(6 |
)% |
|
$ |
715 |
|
$ |
781 |
|
(8 |
)% |
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
27 |
|
|
27 |
|
- |
% |
|
|
82 |
|
|
88 |
|
(7 |
)% |
Net sales declined while
volume and earnings before income taxes were flat during the current quarter, as
compared to the year-ago quarter. For the six months ended December 31, 2009,
net sales, volume and earnings before income taxes declined as compared to the
year-ago period.
Volume in the current
quarter was primarily driven by higher shipments of Fresh Step® scoopable cat litter
and Glad® trash
bags, offset by lower shipments of Glad® food storage products
primarily due to competitive activity.
Volume decline of 4%
during the six months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by lower
shipments of Glad®
products primarily due to category softness, competitive activity and the
company’s exit from its private label food bags business, partially offset by
increased shipments of Fresh Step® cat
litter.
The variance between
changes in volume and sales during the three and six months ended December 31,
2009, was primarily due to price declines on Glad® trash bags in the
previous fiscal year to bring the pricing in line with resin costs, which have
dropped below year-ago levels (approximately 470 basis points and 250 basis
points, respectively).
Page 24
Earnings before income
taxes for the current quarter reflect the impact of lower sales of Glad® products and higher
advertising of $7 in response to competitive activity partially offset by lower
commodity costs of $17, primarily resin, and cost savings of $7 primarily
associated with the Company’s diversification of its supplier base and various
manufacturing efficiencies.
The decline in earnings
before income taxes for the six months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily
driven by lower sales of Glad® products and higher
advertising of $11 partially offset by lower commodity costs of $35 and cost
savings of $14, primarily associated with the Company’s diversification of its
supplier base and various manufacturing efficiencies.
LIFESTYLE
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
212 |
|
$ |
193 |
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
412 |
|
$ |
387 |
|
6 |
% |
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
78 |
|
|
67 |
|
16 |
% |
|
|
144 |
|
|
123 |
|
17 |
% |
Net sales, volume and earnings
before income taxes increased in the current periods as compared to the year-ago
periods. Volume growth of 12 % in the current quarter and 8% during the six
months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by increased shipments of
Brita®
water-filtration products and Hidden Valley® salad dressing. During
the current quarter there were also increased shipments of Burt’s Bees® natural personal care
products.
Volume growth outpaced net sales
growth in both periods primarily due to increased trade-promotion spending
(approximately 130 basis points and 70 basis points, respectively) and
unfavorable product mix (approximately 110 basis points and 140 basis points,
respectively).
The increase in earnings
before income taxes in both periods was primarily due to higher net sales and
lower commodity costs of $6 and $10, respectively.
INTERNATIONAL
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
309 |
|
$ |
256 |
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
597 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
12 |
% |
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
39 |
|
|
35 |
|
11 |
% |
|
|
86 |
|
|
69 |
|
25 |
% |
Net sales, volume and
earnings before income taxes increased in the current periods as compared to the
year-ago periods. Volume growth of 1% in the current quarter and 2% during the
six months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily driven by increased shipments
of bleach and other disinfecting products in Latin America due to increased
demand as a result of the H1N1 flu pandemic.
Net sales growth
outpaced volume growth in the current quarter primarily due to price increases
(approximately 1,040 basis points) and the impact of favorable foreign exchange
rates (approximately 770 basis points). Net sales growth outpaced volume growth
during the six months ended December 31, 2009, primarily due to price increases
(approximately 1,070 basis points).
Page 25
The increase in earnings before
income taxes for the current period was primarily due to increased sales. This was partially
offset by a foreign currency loss of $12 from remeasuring Venezuela's net
monetary USD-denominated liabilities using the parallel market exchange rate,
foreign currency transaction losses of $7 also from Venezuela as a result of
converting local currency to U.S. dollars through the parallel market currency
exchange rate to
pay for certain
inventory purchases (see “Operating Activities” section below), and higher
advertising of $7 behind infection control support and new product launches.
The increase in earnings
before income taxes during the six months ended December 31, 2009, was primarily
due to increased sales. This was
partially offset by Venezuela foreign currency transaction losses of $15, the
foreign currency remeasurement loss of $12 from Venezuela described above,
higher advertising of $9 and the negative impact of foreign exchange rates of
$9.
CORPORATE
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
12/31/2008 |
|
% Change |
Loss before income taxes |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$
|
(76 |
) |
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
(127 |
) |
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
|
(19 |
)% |
The decrease in losses before
income taxes attributable to Corporate during the current periods was primarily
due to lower interest expense primarily due to a decline in average debt
balances and a decrease in average interest rate paid on commercial paper
borrowings. Also contributing to the decrease in losses before income taxes for
the six months ended December 31, 2009, were lower consulting costs.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Operating Activities
The Company’s financial
condition and liquidity remains strong as of December 31, 2009. Net cash
provided by operations was $246 for the six months ended December 31, 2009 as
compared to $191 for the year-ago period. The increase was primarily due to
higher net earnings and the positive cash impact of changes in working capital,
partially offset by a $33 million voluntary pension plan contribution made
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Based on current pension funding
rules, the Company is not required to make any contributions in fiscal year
2010.
Foreign currency translation
Prior to December 31,
2009, the Company translated its Venezuelan subsidiary’s financial statements
using Venezuela’s official exchange rate, which had been fixed by the Venezuelan
government at 2.15 Bolivar Fuertes (VEF) to the U.S. dollar. However, the
Company’s access to the official exchange rate has become increasingly limited due to
delays in obtaining U.S. dollars through the government sponsored currency
exchange process at the official exchange rate and the removal of some products
from the official list of items that may be imported at the official exchange
rate. This has led to the substantial use of the parallel market currency
exchange rate to convert VEFs to U.S. dollars to pay for certain
imported inventory purchases. The parallel market currency exchange rate
represents the rates negotiated with local financial intermediaries. Due to
these circumstances, effective December 31, 2009, the Company began translating
its Venezuelan subsidiary’s financial statements using the parallel market
currency exchange rate, the rate at which the Company expects to be able to
remit dividends or return capital. The rate used at December 31, 2009, was 5.87
VEF to the U.S. dollar. On a pre-tax basis, the translation resulted in a
remeasurement loss of $12.
Page 26
During the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009, net sales in Venezuela were approximately 3% of
total Company net sales. As of December 31, 2009, total assets in Venezuela were
approximately 1% of total Company assets.
Effective January 1,
2010, according to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (U.S. GAAP), Venezuela has been designated as a hyper-inflationary
economy. A hyper-inflationary economy designation occurs when a country has
experienced cumulative inflation of approximately 100 percent or more over a 3
year period. The hyper-inflationary designation requires
the local subsidiary in Venezuela to record all transactions as if they were
denominated in U.S. dollars. Bolivar denominated monetary assets will be
remeasured at the parallel market currency rate and will be recognized in
earnings rather than in currency translation adjustment on the balance
sheet.
The Company estimates
pre-tax foreign currency losses for Venezuela of approximately $20 or about 9
cents per diluted share in the second half of fiscal 2010, resulting primarily
from transacting at the parallel market currency rate. The Company further
estimates that net sales will be reduced by approximately 2% during the same
period.
Working Capital
The Company’s working capital,
defined in this context as total current assets net of total current
liabilities, increased by $488 from June 30, 2009 to December 31, 2009,
principally due to a decrease in notes and loans payable by $396 resulting from
the use of proceeds from a new bond issuance (See “Financing Activities” below)
and other Company cash flows to pay down commercial paper. Also contributing to
the increase in working capital was a decrease in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities primarily driven by a $54 reduction as a result of improved vendor
accounts management and timing of vendor payments, and a $28 reduction related
to the payment of the fiscal year 2009 annual incentive program and value
sharing awards, net of fiscal year 2010 first half annual incentive and value
sharing accruals.
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures
were $76 during the six months ended December 31, 2009, compared to $84 in the
comparable prior year period. Capital spending as a percentage of net sales was
2.9% during the six months ended December 31, 2009, compared to 3.2% during the
six months ended December 31, 2008. Higher capital spending during the six
months ended December 31, 2008, was driven primarily by the Company’s
manufacturing network consolidation efforts.
In January 2010, the Company acquired the assets of Caltech Industries, a
company which provides disinfectants for the health care industry, for an
aggregate price of $23, with the objective of expanding the Company’s
capabilities in the areas of health and wellness. In connection with the
purchase, the Company acquired Caltech Industries’ facility and its employees.
The transaction was structured as an all cash acquisition.
Financing Activities
Net cash used for
financing activities was $225 for the six months ended December 31, 2009,
compared to net cash used for financing activities of $210 in the comparable
prior year period. The increase in cash used for financing activities was
primarily due to an increase in dividend payment.
In November 2009, the
Company issued $300 of long-term debt in senior notes. The notes carry an annual
fixed interest rate of 3.55% payable semi-annually in May and November. The
notes mature on November 1, 2015. Proceeds from the notes were used to retire
commercial paper. The notes rank equally with all of the Company’s existing and
future senior indebtedness.
Page 27
At December 31, 2009,
the Company had $22 of commercial paper outstanding at a weighted average
interest rate of 0.3%. In January 2010, $575 of debt became due and was paid.
The Company funded the debt repayment through the use of commercial paper and to
a lesser extent, operating cash flows. The Company continues to successfully
issue commercial paper. Continued volatility in the capital markets may increase
costs associated with issuing commercial paper or other debt instruments or
affect our ability to access those markets in the future. Notwithstanding these
adverse market conditions, the Company believes that current cash balances and
cash generated by operations, together with access to external sources of funds
as described below, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s operating and
capital needs in the foreseeable future.
Credit Arrangements
At December 31, 2009,
the Company had a $1,100 revolving credit agreement with an expiration date of
April 2013. There were no borrowings under this revolving credit arrangement,
which the Company believes is now available and will continue to be available
for general corporate purposes and to support commercial paper issuances. The
revolving credit agreement includes certain restrictive covenants. The primary
restrictive covenant is a maximum ratio of total debt to EBITDA for the trailing
4 quarters (EBITDA ratio), as defined in the Company’s lending agreements, of
3.25. EBITDA, as defined by the revolving credit agreement, may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities. The Company’s
EBITDA ratio at December 31, 2009, was 2.45.
The following table sets
forth the calculation of the EBITDA ratio, as defined in the Company’s lending
agreement, at December 31, 2009:
|
|
3/31/2009 |
|
6/30/2009 |
|
9/30/2009 |
|
12/31/2009 |
|
Total |
Net earnings |
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
Add
back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
Asset impairment
charges |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Deduct: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
EBITDA |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
|
|
Debt at December 31,
2009 |
|
$ |
3,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
ratio |
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
The Company is in
compliance with all restrictive covenants and limitations as of December 31,
2009. The Company anticipates being in compliance with all restrictive covenants
for the foreseeable future.
The Company continues to
monitor the financial markets and assess its ability to fully draw under its
revolving credit facility, but expects that any drawing under the facility will
be fully funded.
In addition, the Company
had $45 of foreign working capital credit lines and other facilities at December
31, 2009, of which $31 was available for borrowing. The Company was also a party
to letters of credit of $20, primarily related to one of its insurance carriers.
Page 28
Share Repurchases
The Company has two
share repurchase programs: an open-market purchase program, which had, as of
December 31, 2009, a total authorization of $750, and a program to offset the
impact of share dilution related to share-based awards (the Evergreen Program),
which has no authorization limit as to amount or timing of repurchases.
The Company did not
repurchase any shares during the three or six month periods ended December 31,
2009 and 2008.
The Company is involved
in certain environmental matters, including Superfund and other response actions
at various locations. The Company has a recorded liability of $18 and 19 at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, for its share of the related
aggregate future remediation cost. One matter in Dickinson County, Michigan, for
which the Company is jointly and severally liable, accounts for a substantial
majority of the recorded liability at both December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
The Company is subject to a cost-sharing arrangement with Ford Motor Co. (Ford)
for this matter, under which the Company has agreed to be liable for 24.3% of
the aggregate remediation and associated costs, other than legal fees, as the
Company and Ford are each responsible for their own such fees. If Ford is unable
to pay its share of the response and remediation obligations, the Company would
likely be responsible for such obligations. In October 2004, the Company and
Ford agreed to a consent judgment with the Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality, which sets forth certain remediation goals and monitoring activities.
Based on the current status of this matter, and with the assistance of
environmental consultants, the Company maintains an undiscounted liability
representing its best estimate of its share of costs associated with the capital
expenditures, maintenance and other costs to be incurred over an estimated
30-year remediation period. The most significant components of the liability
relate to the estimated costs associated with the remediation of groundwater
contamination and excess levels of subterranean methane deposits. The Company
made payments of less than $1 during each of the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, towards remediation efforts. Currently, the Company
cannot accurately predict the timing of the payments that will likely be made
under this estimated obligation. In addition, the Company’s estimated loss
exposure is sensitive to a variety of uncertain factors, including the efficacy
of remediation efforts, changes in remediation requirements and the timing,
varying costs and alternative clean-up technologies that may become available in
the future. Although it is possible that the Company’s exposure may exceed the
amount recorded, any amount of such additional exposures, or range of exposures,
is not estimable at this time.
The Company is subject
to various other lawsuits and claims relating to issues such as contract
disputes, product liability, patents and trademarks, advertising, employee and
other matters. Although the results of claims and litigation cannot be predicted
with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of
these matters, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a
material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
Page 29
Recently adopted pronouncements
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which provides that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities that
must be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the
two-class method. These payment awards were previously not considered
participating securities. Accordingly, the Company’s unvested performance units,
restricted stock awards and restricted stock units that provide such
nonforfeitable rights are now considered participating securities in the
calculation of net earnings per share (EPS). The Company’s share-based payment
awards granted in fiscal year 2010 are not participating securities. The new
standard requires the retrospective adjustment of the Company’s earnings per
share data. The impact of the retrospective adoption of the new accounting
standard on the fiscal year 2009 reported EPS data was as follows:
|
|
Basic |
|
Diluted |
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
|
As previously |
|
|
|
|
|
reported |
|
As restated |
|
reported |
|
As restated |
Three months ended December 31,
2008 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
$ |
0.61 |
Six
months ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
1.51 |
|
Three months ended March 31,
2009 |
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
1.08 |
Nine
months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
2.59 |
|
Three months ended June 30,
2009 |
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
1.20 |
Year
ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3.86 |
|
|
3.82 |
|
|
3.81 |
|
|
3.79 |
The calculation of EPS
under the new accounting standard is disclosed in Note 7 to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which establishes principles and
requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed,
including contingent liabilities, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquired
business. The new accounting standard also provides for recognizing and
measuring the goodwill acquired in a business combination and requires
disclosure of information to enable users of the financial statements to
evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The
adoption of the new accounting standard had no impact on the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which establishes new accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (previously
referred to as minority interest) and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
The new standard establishes accounting and reporting standards that require the
noncontrolling interest to be reported as a component of equity. Changes in a
parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest
will be accounted for as equity transactions and any retained noncontrolling
equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary will be initially
measured at fair value. The adoption of the new accounting standard had no
material impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Page 30
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted a new accounting standard which requires disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments in interim financial information (See Note 3
to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company already complies with the
provisions of this accounting standard for its annual reporting.
On July 1, 2009, the
Company adopted the provisions of the accounting standard on fair value
measurements that apply to nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The adoption of
these provisions did not have an impact on the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
On September 30, 2009, the Company
adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification). The Codification is the single official source
of authoritative U.S. GAAP (other than the SEC’s views), superseding all other
accounting literature except that issued by the SEC. The adoption of the
Codification had no impact on the condensed consolidated balance sheets,
statements of operations or cash flows.
Pronouncements to be adopted
On December 30, 2008,
the FASB issued an accounting standard that will require additional disclosures
about the major categories of plan assets and concentrations of risk for an
employer’s plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement
plan, as well as disclosure of fair value levels, similar to the disclosure
requirements of the fair value measurements accounting standard. This standard
is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, with early
application permitted. The Company will provide these enhanced disclosures about
plan assets in its 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In January 2010, the
FASB issued an accounting standard update (ASU) to Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies existing
disclosure requirements about fair value measurement. Specifically, the Company
will be required to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in
and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to also describe the
reasons for the transfers. This ASU is applicable for the Company beginning in
its fiscal 2010 third quarter. The Company does not expect the adoption of this
ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements
disclosures.
Page 31
Cautionary Statement
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q (this Report), including the exhibits hereto contains “forward looking
statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and such forward looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. Except for historical information, matters discussed
below, including statements about future volume, sales, costs, cost savings,
earnings, cash flows, plans, objectives, expectations, growth, or profitability,
are forward looking statements based on management’s estimates, assumptions and
projections. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,”
“projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and variations
on such words, and similar expressions, are intended to identify such forward
looking statements. These forward looking statements are only predictions,
subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially
from those discussed below. Important factors that could affect performance and
cause results to differ materially from management’s expectations are described
in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009, as updated from
time to time in the Company’s SEC filings. These factors include, but are not
limited to: unfavorable general economic and marketplace conditions and events,
including consumer confidence and consumer spending levels, the rate of economic
growth, the rate of inflation, and the financial condition of our customers,
suppliers and service providers; foreign currency exchange rate and interest
rate fluctuations; unfavorable political conditions in international markets and
risks relating to international operations; the Company’s costs, including
volatility and increases in commodity costs such as resin, diesel, chlor-alkali,
agricultural commodities and other raw materials; increases in energy costs; the
impact of the volatility of the debt markets on the Company’s cost of borrowing
and access to funds, including commercial paper and its credit facility; risks
relating to changes in the Company’s capital structure; risks arising from
declines in cash flow, whether resulting from tax payments, debt payments, share
repurchases, interest cost increases greater than management’s expectations, or
increases in debt or changes in credit ratings, or otherwise; changes in the
Company’s tax rate; the success of the Company’s strategies, including its
previously announced Centennial Strategy; risks relating to acquisitions,
mergers and divestitures, including the Company’s ability to achieve the
projected strategic and financial benefits from the Burt’s Bees acquisition; the
ability of the Company to implement and generate expected savings from its
programs to reduce costs, including its Supply Chain Restructuring and Other
restructuring plan changes; the need for any unanticipated restructuring or
asset-impairment charges; the success of new products and the ability of the
Company to develop products that delight the consumer; consumer and customer
reaction to price increases; risks related to customer concentration;
customer-specific ordering patterns and trends; competitive actions; supply
disruptions or any future supply constraints that may affect key commodities or
product inputs; risks inherent in supplier relationships, including
sole-supplier relationships; risks related to the handling and/or transportation
of hazardous substances, including but not limited to chlorine; risks related to
the conversion of the Company’s information systems, including potential
disruptions and costs; risks arising out of natural disasters; the impact of
disease outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics on the Company’s operations; risks
inherent in litigation; risks inherent in maintaining an effective system of
internal controls, including the potential impact of acquisitions or the use of
third-party service providers; the ability to manage and realize the benefit of
joint ventures and other cooperative relationships, including the Company’s
joint venture regarding the Company’s Glad® plastic bags, wraps
and containers business, and the agreements relating to the provision of
information technology and related services by third parties; the ability of the
Company to successfully manage tax, regulatory, product liability, intellectual
property, environmental and other legal matters, including the risk resulting
from joint and several liability for environmental contingencies and risks
inherent in litigation including class action litigation; and the Company’s
ability to maintain its business reputation and the reputation of its
brands.
The Company’s forward
looking statements in this Report are based on management’s current views and
assumptions regarding future events and speak only as of their dates. The
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward
looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by the federal securities laws.
In this Report, unless
the context requires otherwise, the terms “the Company” and “Clorox” refer to
The Clorox Company and its subsidiaries.
Page 32
There have not been any
material changes to the Company’s market risk during the three and six months
ended December 31, 2009. For additional information, refer to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
The Company’s
management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, were effective such that the
information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii)
accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding disclosure. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Page 33
For information
regarding Risk Factors, please refer to Item 1.A. in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009.
The following table sets
out the purchases of the Company’s securities by the Company and any affiliated
purchasers within the meaning of Rule 10b-18(a)(3) (17 CFR 240.10b-18(a)(3))
during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010.
|
|
[a] |
|
[b] |
|
[c] |
|
[d] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Value) that May Yet |
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Be Purchased Under
the |
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
per Share (or Unit) |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Plans or Programs(2) |
October 1 to 31, 2009 |
|
13,707 |
|
|
$ |
57.53 |
|
- |
|
$ |
750,000,000 |
November 1 to 30, 2009 |
|
959 |
|
|
$ |
59.02 |
|
- |
|
$ |
750,000,000 |
December 1 to 31, 2009 |
|
1,228 |
|
|
$ |
59.63 |
|
- |
|
$ |
750,000,000 |
____________________
(1) |
|
The
shares purchased in October, November and December 2009 relate entirely to
the surrender to the Company of shares of common stock to satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of stock options
and vesting of restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance
units. |
|
(2) |
|
On May
13, 2008, the board of directors approved a new $750,000,000 share
repurchase program, all of which remains available for repurchase as of
June 30, 2009. On September 1, 1999, the Company announced a share
repurchase program to reduce or eliminate dilution upon the issuance of
shares pursuant to the Company’s stock compensation plans. The program
initiated in 1999 has no specified cap and therefore is not included in
column [d] above. On November 15, 2005, the Board of Directors authorized
the extension of the 1999 program to reduce or eliminate dilution in
connection with issuances of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2005
Stock Incentive Plan. None of these programs has a specified termination
date. |
Page 34
The 2009 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders of The Clorox Company was held on November 18, 2009. The
following individuals were elected as directors for terms expiring at the next
annual meeting of the stockholders.
|
FOR |
AGAINST |
ABSTAINED |
Daniel Boggan, Jr. |
115,176,316 |
1,879,615 |
283,873 |
Richard H. Carmona |
115,235,564 |
1,842,018 |
262,222 |
Tully M. Friedman |
115,322,530 |
1,751,394 |
265,880 |
George J. Harad |
115,422,333 |
1,637,082 |
280,389 |
Donald R. Knauss |
114,713,624 |
2,357,418 |
268,762 |
Robert W. Matschullat |
114,914,998 |
2,162,153 |
262,653 |
Gary
G. Michael |
116,113,063 |
943,868 |
282,873 |
Edward A. Mueller |
112,896,429 |
4,173,567 |
269,808 |
Jan
L. Murley |
115,308,173 |
1,759,714 |
271,917 |
Pamela Thomas-Graham |
116,025,142 |
1,032,290 |
282,372 |
Carolyn M. Ticknor |
116,182,335 |
921,362 |
236,107 |
Stockholders also acted
upon the following proposals at the Annual Meeting:
A proposal to ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered
public accountants for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, was approved. There
were 116,716,627 votes in favor of the proposal, 414,468 against and 208,709
abstentions.
A stockholder proposal
was not approved. There were 18,193,558 votes in favor of the proposal,
74,929,616 against, 23,820,307
abstentions and
23,820,307 broker non-votes.
(a) Exhibits
3.2 |
|
Bylaws
(amended and Restated) of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 20, 2009, incorporated herein by
reference.) |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
101 |
|
The
following materials from The Clorox Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, formatted in eXtensible
Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets,
(iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of
text. |
Page 35
S I G N A T U R E
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
THE CLOROX COMPANY |
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATE: February 5, 2010 |
BY |
/s/ Thomas
D. Johnson |
|
|
Thomas D.
Johnson |
|
|
Vice
President – Global Business Services and |
|
|
Chief
Accounting Officer |
Page 36
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit No.
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
101 |
|
The
following materials from The Clorox Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, formatted in eXtensible
Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets,
(iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of
text. |
Page 37