Edgar Filing: SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO

Document

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the Period Ended March 31, 2017



o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-04851

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



OHIO	34-0526850
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

101 West Prospect Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio	44115-1075
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(216) 566-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one:)



Large accelerated filer	x		Accelerated filer	o

Non-accelerated filer	o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

Emerging growth company	o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value – 93,128,304 shares as of March 31, 2017.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements	2
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	26
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	27

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	28
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	29
Item 5. Other Information	30
Item 6. Exhibits	31

SIGNATURES	32
INDEX TO EXHIBITS	33
EX-4.1
EX-4.2
EX-4.3
EX-10.1
EX-10.2
EX-10.3
EX-31(a)
EX-31(b)
EX-32(a)
EX-32(b)
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABEL LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

Thousands of dollars, except per share data



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016 ⁽¹⁾
Net sales	$	2,761,387		$	2,574,024
Cost of goods sold	1,418,247			1,312,279
Gross profit	1,343,140			1,261,745
Percent to net sales	48.6		%	49.0		%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	1,016,211			1,002,355
Percent to net sales	36.8		%	38.9		%
Other general expense - net	276			17,554
Interest expense	25,695			25,732
Interest and net investment income	(1,280		)	(487		)
Other (income) expense - net	(4,367		)	226
Income before income taxes	306,605			216,365
Income taxes	67,453			51,489
Net income	$	239,152		$	164,876
Net income per common share:
Basic	$	2.58		$	1.80
Diluted	$	2.53		$	1.75
Average shares outstanding - basic	92,550,559			91,475,860
Average shares and equivalents outstanding - diluted	94,541,859			94,114,114
Comprehensive income	$	230,090		$	183,886

⁽¹⁾First quarter 2016 income taxes, net income, basic and diluted net income per common share and diluted average shares and equivalents outstanding are restated due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 in the second quarter of 2016.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

Thousands of dollars



	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			March 31, 2016
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,017,808		$	889,793		$	70,548
Accounts receivable, less allowance	1,356,851			1,230,987			1,290,749
Inventories:
Finished goods	1,069,673			898,627			972,037
Work in process and raw materials	178,015			169,699			175,324
	1,247,688			1,068,326			1,147,361
Deferred income taxes	—			57,162			97,562
Other current assets	254,317			381,030			282,405
Total current assets	3,876,664			3,627,298			2,888,625
Goodwill	1,129,783			1,126,892			1,147,047
Intangible assets	252,934			255,010			250,574
Deferred pension assets	224,212			225,529			246,035
Other assets	442,215			421,904			449,003
Property, plant and equipment:
Land	116,077			115,555			120,568
Buildings	721,469			714,815			704,594
Machinery and equipment	2,205,706			2,153,437			2,071,637
Construction in progress	70,895			117,126			89,839
	3,114,147			3,100,933			2,986,638
Less allowances for depreciation	2,051,052			2,005,045			1,929,613
	1,063,095			1,095,888			1,057,025
Total Assets	$	6,988,903		$	6,752,521		$	6,038,309

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	$	41,909		$	40,739		$	128,675
Accounts payable	1,221,778			1,034,608			1,152,923
Compensation and taxes withheld	296,176			398,045			284,860
Accrued taxes	158,587			76,765			115,403
Current portion of long-term debt	700,786			700,475			2,179
Other accruals	519,766			578,547			578,521
Total current liabilities	2,939,002			2,829,179			2,262,561
Long-term debt	1,211,512			1,211,326			1,908,774
Postretirement benefits other than pensions	252,031			250,397			250,168
Other long-term liabilities	521,008			583,178			615,983
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock—$1.00 par value:
93,128,304, 93,013,031 and 92,495,113 shares outstanding
at March 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016, respectively	116,775			116,563			116,043
Other capital	2,547,621			2,488,564			2,372,641
Retained earnings	4,209,198			4,049,497			3,316,018
Treasury stock, at cost	(4,258,831		)	(4,235,832		)	(4,235,794		)
Cumulative other comprehensive loss	(549,413		)	(540,351		)	(568,085		)
Total shareholders' equity	2,065,350			1,878,441			1,000,823
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	6,988,903		$	6,752,521		$	6,038,309

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Thousands of dollars



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	239,152		$	164,876
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net operating cash:
Depreciation	44,595			42,895
Amortization of intangible assets	6,182			5,782
Stock-based compensation expense	17,321			15,765
Amortization of credit facility and debt issuance costs	984			6,656
Provisions for qualified exit costs	2,856			1,126
Provisions for environmental-related matters	519			18,029
Defined benefit pension plans net cost	5,155			6,992
Net increase in postretirement liability	1,910			961
Other	(37,379		)	(147		)
Change in working capital accounts - net	(58,402		)	(298,341		)
Costs incurred for environmental-related matters	(3,372		)	(5,036		)
Costs incurred for qualified exit costs	(996		)	(2,868		)
Other	13,291			(18,749		)
Net operating cash	231,816			(62,059		)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures	(41,479		)	(51,999		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	34,762			988
Increase in other investments	(23,194		)	(10,526		)
Net investing cash	(29,911		)	(61,537		)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in short-term borrowings	326			85,770
Payments of long-term debt	(71		)	—
Payments for credit facility and debt issuance costs	(7		)	(41,850		)
Payments of cash dividends	(79,450		)	(77,734		)
Proceeds from stock options exercised	41,762			19,717
Other	(22,702		)	(9,583		)
Net financing cash	(60,142		)	(23,680		)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(13,748		)	12,080
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	128,015			(135,196		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	889,793			205,744
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,017,808		$	70,548

Income taxes paid	$	8,675		$	23,155
Interest paid	30,841			30,552

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

There have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies since December 31, 2016. Accounting estimates were revised as necessary during the first three months of 2017 based on new information and changes in facts and circumstances. Certain amounts in the 2016 condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2017 presentation.

The Company primarily uses the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of valuing inventory. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. In addition, interim inventory levels include management’s estimates of annual inventory losses due to shrinkage and other factors. The final year-end valuation of inventory is based on an annual physical inventory count performed during the fourth quarter. For further information on inventory valuations and other matters, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The consolidated results for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

NOTE 2—IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted the Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2015-17, "Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes," which eliminates the requirement for separate presentation of current and non-current portions of deferred tax. Subsequent to adoption, all deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented as non-current on the balance sheet. The changes have been applied prospectively as permitted by the ASU and prior years have not been restated. The adoption of this ASU does not have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2017-07, "Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Costs." The standard requires the service component of pension and other postretirement benefit expense to be presented in the same income statement lines as other employee compensation costs, however, the other components will be presented outside of operating income. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. The standard is effective starting in 2018, with early adoption permitted. Retrospective application is required for the guidance on the income statement presentation. Prospective application is required for the guidance on the cost capitalization in assets. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the standard.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” This standard simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment by elimination the Step 2 requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill. Instead, if a reporting unit's carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge will be recorded based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard will be applied prospectively and is effective for impairment tests performed after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases,” which consists of a comprehensive lease accounting standard. Under the new standard, assets and liabilities arising from most leases will be recognized on the balance sheet. Leases will be classified as either operating or financing, and the lease classification will determine whether expense is recognized on a straight line basis (operating leases) or based on an effective interest method (financing leases). The new standard is effective for interim and annual periods starting in 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required with certain practical

expedients available. The Company has made significant progress with its assessment process, and anticipates this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated balance sheet. While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, it currently believes the most significant impact relates to recording lease assets and related liabilities on the balance sheet for the Paint Store Group's retail operations.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which amends the guidance for certain aspects of recognition, measurement and disclosure of financial instruments. The standard is effective for interim and annual periods starting in 2018, and early adoption is not permitted. Although the Company continues to assess the potential impacts of the standard, it currently believes that the main impact will be that changes in fair value of marketable securities currently classified as available-for-sale will be recognized in earnings rather than in other comprehensive income. The standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which consists of a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The issuance of ASU No. 2015-14 in August 2015 delays the effective date of the standard to interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Either full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption is permitted. In addition to expanded disclosures regarding revenue, this pronouncement may impact timing of recognition in some arrangements with variable consideration or contracts for the sale of goods or services. The Company has made significant progress with its assessment process. In addition, the Company is currently developing plans for enhancements to its information systems and internal controls in response to the new rule requirements. The Company plans to adopt the standard using the full retrospective method of adoption, which requires the restatement of prior periods presented. The Company expects to have expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and is in process of evaluating the impact on the results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

NOTE 3—DIVIDENDS

Dividends paid on common stock during the first quarter of 2017 and 2016 were $.85 per common share and $.84 per common share, respectively.

NOTE 4—CHANGES IN CUMULATIVE OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following tables summarize the changes in Cumulative other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:




(Thousands of dollars)	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments			Unrealized Net Gains on Available-for-Sale Securities		Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges			Total Cumulative Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	(501,277	)	$	(125,096	)	$	1,015	$	85,007		$	(540,351	)
Amounts recognized in Other comprehensive loss⁽¹⁾	20,778						630		(30,754		)	(9,346		)
Amounts reclassified from Other comprehensive loss ⁽²⁾				279			5					284
Net change	20,778			279			635		(30,754		)	(9,062		)
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	(480,499	)	$	(124,817	)	$	1,650	$	54,253		$	(549,413	)

⁽¹⁾Net of taxes of $(389) for unrealized net gains on available-for-sale securities and $18,895 for unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges.

⁽²⁾ Net of taxes of $(142) for pension and other postretirement benefit adjustments and $(3) for realized losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities.




(Thousands of dollars)	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Adjustments			Unrealized Net (Losses) Gains on Available-for-Sale Securities			Unrealized Net Losses on Cash Flow Hedges			Total Cumulative Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(482,629	)	$	(104,346	)	$	(120	)				$	(587,095	)
Amounts recognized in Other comprehensive loss⁽³⁾	33,546						(42		)	$	(14,682	)	18,822
Amounts reclassified from Other comprehensive loss ⁽⁴⁾				168			20						188
Net change	33,546			168			(22		)	(14,682		)	19,010
Balance at March 31, 2016	$	(449,083	)	$	(104,178	)	$	(142	)	$	(14,682	)	$	(568,085	)

⁽³⁾Net of taxes of $25 for unrealized net losses on available-for-sale securities and $9,075 for unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges.

⁽⁴⁾Net of taxes of $(3) for pension and other postretirement benefit adjustments and $(12) for realized losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities.

NOTE 5—PRODUCT WARRANTIES

Changes in the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims during the first three months of 2017 and 2016, including customer satisfaction settlements, were as follows:



(Thousands of dollars)
	2017			2016
Balance at January 1	$	34,419		$	31,878
Charges to expense	6,076			5,541
Settlements	(7,508		)	(5,135		)
Balance at March 31	$	32,987		$	32,284

For further details on the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

NOTE 6—EXIT OR DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES

Liabilities associated with exit or disposal activities are recognized as incurred in accordance with the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic of the ASC. Qualified exit costs primarily include post-closure rent expenses, incremental post-closure costs and costs of employee terminations. Adjustments may be made to liabilities accrued for qualified exit costs if information becomes available upon which more accurate amounts can be reasonably estimated. Concurrently, property, plant and equipment is tested for impairment in accordance with the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the ASC, and if impairment exists, the carrying value of the related assets is reduced to estimated fair value. Additional impairment may be recorded for subsequent revisions in estimated fair value.

In the three months ended March 31, 2017, three stores in the Paint Stores Group and one branch in the Global Finishes Group were closed due to lower demand or redundancy.

The following table summarizes the activity and remaining liabilities associated with qualified exit costs at March 31, 2017:



(Thousands of dollars)
Exit Plan	Balance at December 31, 2016		Provisions in Cost of goods sold or SG&A		Actual expenditures charged to accrual			Balance at March 31, 2017
Consumer Group facilities shutdown in 2016:
Severance and related costs	$	907	$	2,756				$	3,663
Global Finishes Group stores shutdown in 2016:
Severance and related costs	136				$	(95	)	41
Other qualified exit costs	269		97		(74		)	292
Paint Stores Group stores shutdown in 2015:
Other qualified exit costs	195		3		(20		)	178
Global Finishes Group exit of a business in 2015:
Other qualified exit costs	433				(383		)	50
Severance and other qualified exit costs for facilities shutdown prior to 2015	1,908				(424		)	1,484
Totals	$	3,848	$	2,856	$	(996	)	$	5,708

For further details on the Company’s exit or disposal activities, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

NOTE 7—HEALTH CARE, PENSION AND OTHER BENEFITS

Shown below are the components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost (credit) for domestic defined benefit pension plans, foreign defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefits other than pensions:



(Thousands of dollars)	Domestic Defined Benefit Pension Plans						Foreign Defined Benefit Pension Plans						Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016
Three Months Ended March 31:
Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	5,313		$	5,489		$	1,918		$	1,341		$	543		$	561
Interest cost	6,410			6,643			1,638			2,080			2,643			2,752
Expected return on assets	(10,309		)	(12,567		)	(1,764		)	(1,846		)
Amortization of:
Prior service cost (credit)	341			301									(1,645		)	(1,645		)
Actuarial loss	1,661			1,152			(53		)	361			11
Settlement costs										4,038
Net periodic benefit cost	$	3,416		$	1,018		$	1,739		$	5,974		$	1,552		$	1,668

The settlement charge recognized in the first quarter of 2016 relates to the wind up of an acquired Canada plan. For further details on the Company’s health care, pension and other benefits, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

NOTE 8—OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

The Company initially provides for estimated costs of environmental-related activities relating to its past operations and third party sites for which commitments or clean-up plans have been developed and when such costs can be reasonably estimated based on industry standards and professional judgment. These estimated costs are determined based on currently available facts regarding each site. If the best estimate of costs can only be identified as a range and no specific amount within that range can be determined more likely than any other amount within the range, the minimum of the range is provided. At March 31, 2017, the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes is $86.6 million higher than the minimum.

The Company continuously assesses its potential liability for investigation and remediation-related activities and adjusts its environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Actual costs incurred may vary from these estimates due to the inherent uncertainties involved including, among others, the number and financial condition of parties involved with respect to any given site, the volumetric contribution which may be attributed to the Company relative to that attributed to other parties, the nature and magnitude of the wastes involved, the various technologies that can be used for remediation and the determination of acceptable remediation with respect to a particular site.

Included in Other long-term liabilities at March 31, 2017 and 2016 were accruals for extended environmental-related activities of $161.6 million and $143.4 million, respectively. Estimated costs of current investigation and remediation activities of $20.0 million and $22.5 million are included in Other accruals at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Three of the Company’s currently and formerly owned manufacturing sites account for the majority of the accrual for environmental-related activities and the unaccrued maximum of the estimated range of possible outcomes at March 31, 2017. At March 31, 2017, $151.4 million, or 83.4 percent of the total accrual, related directly to these three sites. In the aggregate unaccrued maximum of $86.6 million at March 31, 2017, $70.5 million, or 81.4 percent, related to the three manufacturing sites. While environmental investigations and remedial actions are in different stages at these sites, additional investigations, remedial actions and monitoring will likely be required at each site.

Management cannot presently estimate the ultimate potential loss contingencies related to these sites or other less significant sites until such time as a substantial portion of the investigation at the sites is completed and remedial action plans are developed. In the event any future loss contingency significantly exceeds the current amount accrued, the recording of the ultimate liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the additional costs are accrued. Management does not believe that any potential liability ultimately attributed to the Company for its environmental-related matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow due to the extended period of time during which environmental investigation and remediation takes place. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s operations cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.

Management expects these contingent environmental-related liabilities to be resolved over an extended period of time. Management is unable to provide a more specific time frame due to the indefinite amount of time to conduct investigation activities at any site, the indefinite amount of time to obtain environmental agency approval, as necessary, with respect to investigation and remediation activities, and the indefinite amount of time necessary to conduct remediation activities.

For further details on the Company’s Other long-term liabilities, see Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

NOTE 9 – LITIGATION

In the course of its business, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits, including, but not limited to, litigation relating to product liability and warranty, personal injury, environmental, intellectual property, commercial, contractual and antitrust claims that are inherently subject to many uncertainties regarding the possibility of a loss to the Company. These uncertainties will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur confirming the incurrence of a liability or the reduction of a liability. In accordance with the Contingencies Topic of the ASC, the Company accrues for these contingencies by a charge to income when it is both probable that one or more future events will occur confirming the fact of a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. In the event that the Company’s loss contingency is ultimately determined to be significantly higher than currently accrued, the recording of the additional liability may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such additional liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded because it is not probable that a liability has

been incurred and the amount of any such loss cannot be reasonably estimated, any potential liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. In those cases where no accrual is recorded or exposure to loss exists in excess of the amount accrued, the Contingencies Topic of the ASC requires disclosure of the contingency when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or additional loss may have been incurred.

Lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. The Company’s past operations included the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The Company, along with other companies, is and has been a defendant in a number of legal proceedings, including individual personal injury actions, purported class actions, and actions brought by various counties, cities, school districts and other government-related entities, arising from the manufacture and sale of lead pigments and lead-based paints. The plaintiffs’ claims have been based upon various legal theories, including negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentations and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentations and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy, violations of unfair trade practice and consumer protection laws, enterprise liability, market share liability, public nuisance, unjust enrichment and other theories. The plaintiffs seek various damages and relief, including personal injury and property damage, costs relating to the detection and abatement of lead-based paint from buildings, costs associated with a public education campaign, medical monitoring costs and others. The Company has also been a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the manufacture and sale of non-lead-based paints that seek recovery based upon various legal theories, including the failure to adequately warn of potential exposure to lead during surface preparation when using non-lead-based paint on surfaces previously painted with lead-based paint. The Company believes that the litigation brought to date is without merit or subject to meritorious defenses and is vigorously defending such litigation. The Company has not settled any material lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation. The Company expects that additional lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation may be filed against the Company in the future asserting similar or different legal theories and seeking similar or different types of damages and relief.

Notwithstanding the Company’s views on the merits, litigation is inherently subject to many uncertainties, and the Company ultimately may not prevail. Adverse court rulings or determinations of liability, among other factors, could affect the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation against the Company and encourage an increase in the number and nature of future claims and proceedings. In addition, from time to time, various legislation and administrative regulations have been enacted, promulgated or proposed to impose obligations on present and former manufacturers of lead pigments and lead-based paints respecting asserted health concerns associated with such products or to overturn the effect of court decisions in which the Company and other manufacturers have been successful.

Due to the uncertainties involved, management is unable to predict the outcome of the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, the number or nature of possible future claims and proceedings or the effect that any legislation and/or administrative regulations may have on the litigation or against the Company. In addition, management cannot reasonably determine the scope or amount of the potential costs and liabilities related to such litigation, or resulting from any such legislation and regulations. The Company has not accrued any amounts for such litigation. With respect to such litigation, including the public nuisance litigation, the Company does not believe that it is probable that a loss has occurred, and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential losses as there is no prior history of a loss of this nature and there is no substantive information upon which an estimate could be based. In addition, any potential liability that may result from any changes to legislation and regulations cannot reasonably be estimated. In the event any significant liability is determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation, the recording of the liability may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued. Additionally, due to the uncertainties associated with the amount of any such liability and/or the nature of any other remedy which may be imposed in such litigation, any potential liability determined to be attributable to the Company arising out of such litigation may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. An estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition cannot be made due to the aforementioned uncertainties.

Public nuisance claim litigation. The Company and other companies are or were defendants in legal proceedings seeking recovery based on public nuisance liability theories, among other theories, brought by the State of Rhode Island, the City of St. Louis, Missouri, various cities and counties in the State of New Jersey, various cities in the State of Ohio and the State of Ohio, the City of Chicago, Illinois, the City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and the County of Santa Clara, California and other public entities in the State of California. Except for the Santa Clara County, California proceeding, all of these legal proceedings have been concluded in favor of the Company and other defendants at various stages in the proceedings.

The proceedings initiated by the State of Rhode Island included two jury trials. At the conclusion of the second trial, the jury returned a verdict finding that (i) the cumulative presence of lead pigment in paints and coatings on buildings in the State of Rhode Island constitutes a public nuisance, (ii) the Company, along with two other defendants, caused or substantially contributed to the creation of the public nuisance and (iii) the Company and two other defendants should be ordered to abate the public nuisance. The Company and two other defendants appealed and, on July 1, 2008, the Rhode Island Supreme Court,

among other determinations, reversed the judgment of abatement with respect to the Company and two other defendants. The Rhode Island Supreme Court’s decision reversed the public nuisance liability judgment against the Company on the basis that the complaint failed to state a public nuisance claim as a matter of law.

The Santa Clara County, California proceeding was initiated in March 2000 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara. In the original complaint, the plaintiffs asserted various claims including fraud and concealment, strict product liability/failure to warn, strict product liability/design defect, negligence, negligent breach of a special duty, public nuisance, private nuisance, and violations of California’s Business and Professions Code. A number of the asserted claims were resolved in favor of the defendants through pre-trial proceedings. The named plaintiffs in the Fourth Amended Complaint, filed on March 16, 2011, are the Counties of Santa Clara, Alameda, Los Angeles, Monterey, San Mateo, Solano and Ventura, the Cities of Oakland and San Diego and the City and County of San Francisco. The Fourth Amended Complaint asserted a sole claim for public nuisance, alleging that the presence of lead pigments for use in paint and coatings in, on and around residences in the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions constitutes a public nuisance. The plaintiffs sought the abatement of the alleged public nuisance that exists within the plaintiffs’ jurisdictions. A trial commenced on July 15, 2013 and ended on August 22, 2013. The court entered final judgment on January 27, 2014, finding in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Company and two other defendants (ConAgra Grocery Products Company and NL Industries, Inc.). The final judgment held the Company jointly and severally liable with the other two defendants to pay $1.15 billion into a fund to abate the public nuisance. The Company strongly disagrees with the judgment. On February 18, 2014, the Company filed a motion for new trial and a motion to vacate the judgment. The court denied these motions on March 24, 2014. On March 28, 2014, the Company filed a notice of appeal to the Sixth District Court of Appeal for the State of California. The filing of the notice of appeal effects an automatic stay of the judgment without the requirement to post a bond. The appeal is fully briefed, and the parties are waiting for the Sixth District Court of Appeal to set a date for oral argument. The date for oral argument is at the discretion of the Sixth District Court of Appeal. The Company expects the Sixth District Court of Appeal to issue its ruling within 90 days following oral argument. The Company believes that the judgment conflicts with established principles of law and is unsupported by the evidence. The Company has had a favorable history with respect to lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, particularly other public nuisance litigation, and accordingly, the Company believes that it is not probable that a loss has occurred and it is not possible to estimate the range of potential loss with respect to the case.

Litigation seeking damages from alleged personal injury. The Company and other companies are defendants in a number of legal proceedings seeking monetary damages and other relief from alleged personal injuries. These proceedings include claims by children allegedly injured from ingestion of lead pigment or lead-containing paint and claims for damages allegedly incurred by the children’s parents or guardians. These proceedings generally seek compensatory and punitive damages, and seek other relief including medical monitoring costs. These proceedings include purported claims by individuals, groups of individuals and class actions.

The plaintiff in Thomas v. Lead Industries Association, et al., initiated an action in state court against the Company, other alleged former lead pigment manufacturers and the Lead Industries Association in September 1999. The claims against the Company and the other defendants included strict liability, negligence, negligent misrepresentation and omissions, fraudulent misrepresentation and omissions, concert of action, civil conspiracy and enterprise liability. Implicit within these claims is the theory of “risk contribution” liability (Wisconsin’s theory which is similar to market share liability, except that liability can be joint and several) due to the plaintiff’s inability to identify the manufacturer of any product that allegedly injured the plaintiff. The case ultimately proceeded to trial and, on November 5, 2007, the jury returned a defense verdict, finding that the plaintiff had ingested white lead carbonate, but was not brain damaged or injured as a result. The plaintiff appealed and, on December 16, 2010, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the final judgment in favor of the Company and other defendants.

Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction to date to apply a theory of liability with respect to alleged personal injury (i.e., risk contribution/market share liability) that does not require the plaintiff to identify the manufacturer of the product that allegedly injured the plaintiff in the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Although the risk contribution liability theory was applied during the Thomas trial, the constitutionality of this theory as applied to the lead pigment cases has not been judicially determined by the Wisconsin state courts. However, in an unrelated action filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., on November 15, 2010, the District Court held that Wisconsin’s risk contribution theory as applied in that case violated the defendants’ right to substantive due process and is unconstitutionally retroactive. The District Court's decision in Gibson v. American Cyanamid, et al., was appealed by the plaintiff to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On July 24, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed the judgment and remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings. On January 16, 2015, the defendants filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court seeking that Court's review of the Seventh Circuit's decision, and on May 18, 2015, the United States Supreme Court denied the defendants' petition. The case is currently pending in the District Court. Three cases also currently pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Wisconsin (Ravon Owens v. American Cyanamid, et al., Cesar Sifuentes v. American Cyanamid, et al., and Glenn Burton, Jr. v. American Cyanamid, et al.) are being prepared for trial, although no trial dates have been set by the District Court.

In Yasmine Clark v. The Sherwin-Williams Company, et al., the Wisconsin Circuit Court, Milwaukee County, on March 25, 2014, held that the application to a pending case of Section 895.046 of the Wisconsin Statutes (which clarifies the application of the risk contribution theory) is unconstitutional as a violation of the plaintiff’s right to due process of law under the Wisconsin Constitution. On August 21, 2014, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals granted defendants' petition to hear the issue as an interlocutory appeal. On September 29, 2015, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals certified the appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its determination. Oral argument before the Wisconsin Supreme Court occurred on April 5, 2016. On April 15, 2016, the Wisconsin Supreme Court published its decision, deciding in a 3 to 3 split decision to remand the case back to the Wisconsin Court of Appeals for its consideration. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on September 20, 2016 and remanded the case back to the Wisconsin Circuit Court for further proceedings. The previously scheduled trial date of October 2017 in the Wisconsin Circuit Court has been vacated, and the Court has not set a new trial date.

Insurance coverage litigation. The Company and its liability insurers, including certain underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, initiated legal proceedings against each other to primarily determine, among other things, whether the costs and liabilities associated with the abatement of lead pigment are covered under certain insurance policies issued to the Company. The Company’s action, filed on March 3, 2006 in the Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, is currently stayed and inactive. The liability insurers’ action, which was filed on February 23, 2006 in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, has been dismissed. An ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation would mean that insurance proceeds could be unavailable under the policies at issue to mitigate any ultimate abatement related costs and liabilities. The Company has not recorded any assets related to these insurance policies or otherwise assumed that proceeds from these insurance policies would be received in estimating any contingent liability accrual. Therefore, an ultimate loss in the insurance coverage litigation without a determination of liability against the Company in the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation will have no impact on the Company’s results of operation, liquidity or financial condition. As previously stated, however, the Company has not accrued any amounts for the lead pigment or lead-based paint litigation and any significant liability ultimately determined to be attributable to the Company relating to such litigation may result in a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition for the annual or interim period during which such liability is accrued.

NOTE 10—OTHER

Other general expense - net

Included in Other general expense - net were the following:



(Thousands of dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Provisions for environmental matters - net	$	519		$	18,029
Gain on sale or disposition of assets	(243		)	(475		)
Total	$	276		$	17,554

Provisions for environmental matters - net represent site-specific increases or decreases to environmental-related accruals as information becomes available upon which more accurate costs can be reasonably estimated and as additional accounting guidelines are issued. Environmental-related accruals are not recorded net of insurance proceeds in accordance with the Offsetting Subtopic of the Balance Sheet Topic of the ASC. See Note 8 for further details on the Company’s environmental-related activities.

The gain on disposition of assets represents net realized gains associated with the sale or disposal of fixed assets previously used in the conduct of the primary business of the Company.

Other (income) expense - net

Included in Other (income) expense - net were the following:



(Thousands of dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Dividend and royalty income	$	(1,844	)	$	(1,166	)
Net expense from banking activities	2,472			2,263
Foreign currency transaction related (gains) losses	(3,586		)	1,690
Other income	(4,960		)	(4,880		)
Other expense	3,551			2,319
Total	$	(4,367	)	$	226

Foreign currency transaction related (gains) losses represent net realized (gains) losses on U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities of foreign subsidiaries and net realized and unrealized (gains) losses from foreign currency option and forward contracts. There were no material foreign currency option and forward contracts outstanding at March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Other income and Other expense included items of revenue, gains, expenses and losses that were unrelated to the primary business purpose of the Company. There were no other items within the other income or other expense caption that were individually significant.

NOTE 11—INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate was 22.0 percent for the first quarter of 2017 compared to 23.8 percent for the first quarter of 2016 (as restated for the retrospective adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 in 2016). The decrease in the effective tax rate was primarily due to the Company's adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. Excluding the impact of ASU No. 2016-09, the effective tax rate was 32.8 percent and 32.0 percent for the first quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively.

At December 31, 2016, the Company had $32.8 million in unrecognized tax benefits, the recognition of which would have an effect of $27.7 million on the effective tax rate. Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 was $2.6 million related to tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts could significantly change during the next twelve months. This amount represents a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits comprised primarily of items related to federal audits of partnership investments and expiring statutes in federal, foreign and state jurisdictions.

The Company classifies all income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense. At December 31, 2016, the Company had accrued $9.3 million for the potential payment of income tax interest and penalties.

There were no significant changes to any of the balances of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 during the first three months of 2017.

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As of March 31, 2017, there were no examinations being conducted by the IRS, however, the statute of limitations has not expired for the 2013, 2014 and 2015 tax years.

As of March 31, 2017, the Company is subject to non-U.S. income tax examinations for the tax years of 2010 through 2016. In addition, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations for the tax years 2003 through 2016.

NOTE 12—NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated using the treasury stock method.



(Thousands of dollars except per share data)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016 ⁽²⁾
Basic
Average common shares outstanding	92,550,559		91,475,860
Net income	$	239,152	$	164,876
Basic net income per common share	$	2.58	$	1.80

Diluted
Average common shares outstanding	92,550,559		91,475,860
Stock options and other contingently issuable shares ⁽¹⁾	1,931,574		2,083,367
Non-vested restricted stock grants	59,726		554,887
Average common shares outstanding assuming dilution	94,541,859		94,114,114

Net income	$	239,152	$	164,876
Diluted net income per common share	$	2.53	$	1.75


⁽¹⁾	Stock options and other contingently issuable shares excludes 40,074 and 34,208 shares due to their anti-dilutive effect for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

⁽²⁾ First quarter 2016 is restated due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 in the second quarter of 2016.

NOTE 13—REPORTABLE SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company reports segment information in the same way that management internally organizes its business for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources in accordance with the Segment Disclosures Topic of the ASC. The Company has determined that it has four reportable operating segments: Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (individually, a "Reportable Segment" and collectively, the “Reportable Segments”).



(Thousands of dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Paint Stores Group		Consumer Group		Global Finishes Group		Latin America Coatings Group		Administrative			Consolidated Totals
Net external sales	$	1,810,357	$	337,484	$	470,336	$	141,389	$	1,821		$	2,761,387
Intersegment transfers			695,838		3,799		2,340		(701,977		)
Total net sales and intersegment transfers	$	1,810,357	$	1,033,322	$	474,135	$	143,729	$	(700,156	)	$	2,761,387

Segment profit	$	304,053	$	60,591	$	52,435	$	1,171				$	418,250
Interest expense									$	(25,695	)	(25,695		)
Administrative expenses and other									(85,950		)	(85,950		)
Income before income taxes	$	304,053	$	60,591	$	52,435	$	1,171	$	(111,645	)	$	306,605



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Paint Stores Group		Consumer Group		Global Finishes Group		Latin America Coatings Group			Administrative			Consolidated Totals
Net external sales	$	1,615,307	$	378,086	$	454,166	$	125,187		$	1,278		$	2,574,024
Intersegment transfers			613,630		1,956		8,693			(624,279		)
Total net sales and intersegment transfers	$	1,615,307	$	991,716	$	456,122	$	133,880		$	(623,001	)	$	2,574,024

Segment profit	$	253,534	$	63,964	$	48,582	$	(928	)				$	365,152
Interest expense										$	(25,732	)	(25,732		)
Administrative expenses and other										(123,055		)	(123,055		)
Income before income taxes	$	253,534	$	63,964	$	48,582	$	(928	)	$	(148,787	)	$	216,365

In the reportable segment financial information, Segment profit was total net sales and intersegment transfers less operating costs and expenses. Domestic intersegment transfers were accounted for at the approximate fully absorbed manufactured cost, based on normal capacity volumes, plus customary distribution costs. International intersegment transfers were accounted for at values comparable to normal unaffiliated customer sales. The Administrative segment includes the administrative expenses of the Company’s corporate headquarters site. Also included in the Administrative segment was interest expense, interest and investment income, certain expenses related to closed facilities and environmental-related matters, and other expenses which were not directly associated with the Reportable Segments. The Administrative segment did not include any significant foreign operations. Also included in the Administrative segment was a real estate management unit that is responsible for the ownership, management and leasing of non-retail properties held primarily for use by the Company, including the Company’s headquarters site, and disposal of idle facilities. Sales of this segment represented external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space or leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary businesses. Gains and losses from the sale of property were not a significant operating factor in determining the performance of the Administrative segment.

Net external sales and segment profit of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were $419.0 million and $13.8 million, respectively, for the first quarter of 2017, and $400.7 million and $10.2 million, respectively, for the first quarter of 2016. Long-lived assets of these subsidiaries totaled $497.1 million and $509.8 million at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively. Domestic operations accounted for the remaining net external sales, segment profits and long-lived assets. No single geographic area outside the United States was significant relative to consolidated net external sales, income before taxes, or consolidated long-lived assets.

Export sales and sales to any individual customer were each less than 10 percent of consolidated sales to unaffiliated customers during all periods presented.

NOTE 14—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC applies to the Company’s financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. The guidance applies when other standards require or permit the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities. The Company did not have any fair value measurements for its non-financial assets and liabilities during the first quarter. The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, categorized using the fair value hierarchy:

(Thousands of dollars)

Quoted Prices

in Active

Significant

Fair Value at

Markets for

Significant Other

Unobservable

March 31,

Identical Assets

Observable Inputs

Inputs

2017

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Assets:

Deferred compensation plan asset ⁽¹⁾

28,941

4,189

24,752

Liabilities:

Deferred compensation plan liability ⁽²⁾

37,719

⁽¹⁾

The deferred compensation plan asset consists of the investment funds maintained for the future payments under the Company’s executive deferred compensation plan, which is structured as a rabbi trust. The investments are marketable securities accounted for under the Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the ASC. The level 1 investments are valued using quoted market prices multiplied by the number of shares. The level 2 investments are valued based on vendor or broker models. The cost basis of the investment funds is $26,843.

⁽²⁾The deferred compensation plan liability is the Company’s liability under its executive deferred compensation plan. The liability represents the fair value of the participant shadow accounts, and the value is based on quoted market prices.

NOTE 15—DEBT

The table below summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s publicly traded debt and non-publicly traded debt in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC. The fair values of the Company’s publicly traded debt are based on quoted market prices. The fair values of the Company’s non-traded debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The Company’s publicly traded debt and non-traded debt are classified as level 1 and level 2, respectively, in the fair value hierarchy.



(Thousands of dollars)	March 31, 2017				March 31, 2016
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Publicly traded debt	$	1,908,209	$	1,925,031	$	1,906,160	$	1,943,160
Non-traded debt	4,089		3,770		4,793		4,476

In April 2016, the Company entered into a $7.3 billion Bridge Loan and a $2.0 billion Term Loan as committed financing for the Valspar acquisition. See Note 17. No balances were drawn against these facilities as of March 31, 2017.

As previously disclosed, during the first six months of 2016, in anticipation of a probable issuance of new long-term fixed rate debt within the next twelve months, the Company entered into a series of interest rate lock agreements (collectively, the interest rate locks) on a combined notional amount of $3.6 billion. The objective of the interest rate locks was to hedge the variability in the future semi-annual payments on the anticipated debt attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate (U.S. Treasury) during the hedge periods. The future semi-annual interest payments are exposed to interest rate risk due to changes in the benchmark interest rate from the inception of the hedge to the time of issuance. The interest rate locks were evaluated for hedge accounting treatment and were designated as cash flow hedges. The interest rate locks were settled in March 2017. The resulting pretax gain of $87.6 million was recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss as the Company expects to issue the new long-term fixed rate debt during the second quarter. There was no material ineffectiveness as of March 31, 2017. The unrealized gain recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will be reclassified to Interest expense in periods following

the issuance of the new debt. The Company expects to amortize unrealized gains of $6.9 million from Cumulative other comprehensive loss as a reduction to Interest expense during the next twelve months.

During the first three months of 2017, the Company amended the five-year credit agreement entered into in May 2016 to increase the aggregate availability to $350.0 million. The credit agreement will be used for general corporate purposes. There were no borrowings outstanding under this credit agreement at March 31, 2017.

NOTE 16—NON-TRADED INVESTMENTS

The Company has invested in the U.S. affordable housing and historic renovation real estate markets. These non-traded investments have been identified as variable interest entities. However, because the Company does not have the power to direct the day-to-day operations of the investments and the risk of loss is limited to the amount of contributed capital, the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the Consolidation Topic of the ASC, the investments are not consolidated. For affordable housing investments entered into prior to the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the effective yield method to determine the carrying value of the investments. Under the effective yield method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense over the period that the tax credits are recognized. For affordable housing investments entered into on or after the January 1, 2015 adoption of ASU No. 2014-01, the Company uses the proportional amortization method. Under the proportional amortization method, the initial cost of the investments is amortized to income tax expense in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received. The carrying amount of the affordable housing and historic renovation investments, included in Other assets, was $197.6 million and $202.8 million at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The liability for estimated future capital contributions to the investments was $166.0 million and $178.9 million at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

NOTE 17—ACQUISITIONS

On March 19, 2016, the Company and The Valspar Corporation (Valspar) entered into a definitive agreement under which the Company will acquire Valspar for $113 per share in an all cash transaction, or a value of approximately $9.5 billion and assumption of Valspar debt. The acquisition will expand Sherwin-Williams' diversified array of brands and technologies, expand its global platform and add new capabilities in the packaging and coil segments. The transaction is subject to certain conditions and regulatory approvals. If in connection with obtaining the required regulatory approvals, the parties are required to divest assets of Valspar or the Company representing, in the aggregate, more than $650 million of Valspar's 2015 revenues, then the per share consideration will be $105 in cash. The Company is not required to consummate the acquisition if regulatory authorities require the divestiture of assets of Valspar or the Company representing, in the aggregate, more than $1.5 billion. Valspar's architectural coatings assets in Australia are excluded from the calculation of the $650 million and/or $1.5 billion threshold if such assets are required to be divested.

On March 20, 2017, the end date of the definitive agreement was extended from the original end date of March 21, 2017 to June 21, 2017. On April 11, 2017, Sherwin-Williams and Valspar entered into a definitive agreement with Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. to divest the assets related to Valspar's North American industrial wood coatings business for approximately $420 million. The planned divestiture represents annual revenues below the $650 million threshold. Therefore, the acquisition is expected to be completed at a price of $113 per share. The completion of the acquisition remains subject to customary conditions, including the receipt of antitrust approvals.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred SG&A of $5.0 million and $31.1 million, respectively, and interest expense of $5.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively, related to the anticipated acquisition of Valspar.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND

ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SUMMARY

The Sherwin-Williams Company, founded in 1866, and its consolidated wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) are engaged in the development, manufacture, distribution and sale of paint, coatings and related products to professional, industrial, commercial and retail customers primarily in North and South America with additional operations in the Caribbean region, Europe and Asia. The Company is structured into four reportable segments—Paint Stores Group, Consumer Group, Global Finishes Group and Latin America Coatings Group (collectively, the “Reportable Segments”)—and an Administrative segment in the same way it is internally organized for assessing performance and making decisions regarding allocation of resources. See pages 8 through 17 and Note 18, on pages 72 through 75, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for more information concerning the Reportable Segments.

Consolidated net sales increased 7.3 percent in the first quarter of 2017 to $2.761 billion from $2.574 billion in the first quarter of 2016. The increase was due primarily to higher paint sales volume in our Paint Stores Group and the impact of a change in revenue classification beginning in the third quarter 2016 related to grossing up third-party service revenue and related costs which were previously netted and immaterial in prior periods. Consolidated gross profit as a percent of consolidated net sales decreased in the first quarter of 2017 to 48.6 percent compared to 2016 at 49.0 percent due primarily to the impact of the change in revenue classification and higher raw material costs partially offset by increased paint volume. Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) decreased as a percent of consolidated net sales to 36.8 percent from 38.9 percent in the first quarter of 2016 primarily due to reduced SG&A costs associated with the anticipated acquisition of Valspar (Acquisition costs) of $5.0 million in the first quarter of 2017 versus $31.1 million in first quarter of 2016.

Interest expense was essentially flat in the first quarter of 2017 versus 2016 due to comparable amortization of credit facility costs incurred in early 2016 and stable debt levels. The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2017 was 22.0 percent compared to 23.8 percent in 2016. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to a larger tax benefit from the Company's adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. Excluding the impact of ASU No. 2016-09, the effective income tax rate was 32.8 percent and 32.0 percent for the first quarter of 2017 and 2016, respectively. Diluted net income per common share in the quarter increased to $2.53 per share from $1.75 per share in 2016, as restated due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. First quarter diluted net income per common share includes an increase of $.34 per share related to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 partially offset by an $.08 per share charge from Acquisition costs. First quarter diluted net income per common share in 2016 included a $.24 per share charge from Acquisition costs partially offset by an increase of $.18 per share related to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated unaudited interim financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report are the responsibility of management. The financial statements and footnotes have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and contain certain amounts that were based upon management’s best estimates, judgments and assumptions that were believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management considered the impact of the uncertain economic environment and utilized certain outside sources of economic information when developing the basis for their estimates and assumptions. The impact of the global economic conditions on the estimates and assumptions used by management was believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management used assumptions based on historical results, considering the current economic trends, and other assumptions to form the basis for determining appropriate carrying values of assets and liabilities that were not readily available from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Also, materially different amounts may result under materially different conditions, materially different economic trends or from using materially different assumptions. However, management believes that any materially different amounts resulting from materially different conditions or material changes in

facts or circumstances are unlikely to significantly impact the current valuation of assets and liabilities that were not readily available from other sources.

A comprehensive discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies and management estimates and significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the financial statements is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1, on pages 44 through 48, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. There have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies, management estimates or accounting policies followed since the year ended December 31, 2016.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CASH FLOW

Overview

The Company’s financial condition, liquidity and cash flow continued to be strong through the first three months of 2017 primarily due to improved operating results in our Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups and lower expenses in the Administrative segment. Net working capital increased $311.6 million at March 31, 2017 compared to the end of the first quarter of 2016 due to a due to a significant increase in cash and other current assets partially offset by a significant increase in current liabilities. Cash and cash equivalents increased $947.3 million from cash generated from operations, accounts receivable increased $66.1 million, and inventories increased $100.3 million. Accounts payable increased $68.9 million while other accruals decreased $58.8 million, primarily due to Acquisition cost accruals, from March 31, 2016. Accrued taxes and compensation and taxes withheld liabilities both increased primarily due to timing. Short-term borrowings decreased $86.8 million and current portion of long-term debt increased $698.6 million resulting from 1.35% senior notes becoming due in 2017. In April 2016, the Company entered into a $7.3 billion bridge credit agreement (Bridge Loan) and a $2.0 billion term loan credit agreement (Term Loan) as committed financing for the Valspar acquisition (Valspar) as disclosed in Note 17. No balances were drawn against these facilities as of March 31, 2017. Debt issuance costs of $65.1 million related to these facilities were substantially amortized and included in Interest expense in the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company continues to maintain sufficient short-term borrowing capacity at reasonable rates, and the Company has sufficient cash on hand and total available borrowing capacity to fund its current operating needs. In the first three months of 2017, cash and cash equivalents increased $128.0 million, accounts receivable increased $125.9 million and inventories increased $179.4 million when normal seasonal trends typically require significant growth in these categories. Accounts payable increased $187.2 million and other accruals decreased $58.8 million, primarily due to Acquisition cost accruals. Short-term borrowings increased $1.2 million. Accrued taxes increased $81.8 million and compensation and taxes withheld liabilities decreased $101.9 million both primarily due to timing of payments. Total debt at March 31, 2017 decreased $85.4 million to $1.954 billion from $2.040 billion at March 31, 2016 and decreased as a percentage of total capitalization to 48.6 percent from 67.1 percent at the end of the first quarter last year. Total debt increased $1.7 million from December 31, 2016 and decreased as a percentage of total capitalization from 51.0 percent to 48.6 percent. At March 31, 2017, the Company had remaining short-term borrowing ability of $1.934 billion. Net operating cash improved $293.9 million in the first three months of 2017 to a cash source of $231.8 million from a cash usage of $62.1 million in 2016. In the twelve month period from April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017, the Company generated net operating cash of $1.602 billion.

Net Working Capital, Debt and Other Long-Term Assets and Liabilities

Cash and cash equivalents increased $128.0 million during the first three months of 2017. Cash and cash equivalents on hand funded cash requirements for increased sales and normal seasonal increases in working capital, capital expenditures of $41.5 million, and payments of cash dividends of $79.5 million. At March 31, 2017, the Company’s current ratio was 1.32 compared to 1.28 at December 31, 2016 and 1.28 a year ago. The increase from a year ago resulted primarily from the increase in cash and cash equivalents.

Goodwill and intangible assets increased $0.8 million from December 31, 2016 and decreased $14.9 million from March 31, 2016. The net increase during the first three months of 2017 was primarily due to capitalized software additions of $2.5 million and foreign currency translation of $4.5 million partially offset by amortization of $6.2 million. The net decrease over the twelve month period from March 31, 2016 was primarily due to amortization of $26.0 million, goodwill impairment of $10.7 million and foreign currency translation of $10.7 million partially offset by capitalized software additions of $24.2 million. See Note 4, on pages 49 and 50, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for more information concerning goodwill and intangible assets.

Deferred pension assets decreased $1.3 million during the first three months of 2017 and decreased $21.8 million from March 31, 2016. The decrease in the last twelve months was due to increased pension benefit obligations, primarily due to changes in actuarial assumptions, and a decrease in the fair value of plan assets. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for more information concerning the Company’s benefit plan assets.

Other assets at March 31, 2017 increased $20.3 million in the first three months of 2017 primarily due to the reclass of current deferred tax assets to non-current due to the adoption of ASU No. 2015-17. See Note 2. Other assets decreased $6.8 million from a year ago primarily due to decreased long-term deposits partially offset by the reclass of current deferred tax assets to non-current.

Net property, plant and equipment decreased $32.8 million in the first three months of 2017 and increased $6.1 million in the twelve months since March 31, 2016. The decrease in the first three months was primarily due to depreciation expense of $44.6 million and sale or disposition of fixed assets of $34.5 million partially offset by capital expenditures of $41.5 million and changes in currency translation rates of $4.9 million. Since March 31, 2016, capital expenditures of $228.5 million were partially offset by depreciation expense of $173.8 million, dispositions or sale of assets with remaining net book value of $41.9 million and changes in currency translation rates of $6.5 million. Capital expenditures during the first three months of 2017 primarily represented expenditures associated with improvements and normal equipment replacement in manufacturing and distribution facilities in the Consumer Group, normal equipment replacement in the Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups, and information systems hardware in the Administrative Segment.

At March 31, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the commercial paper program and short-term borrowings under the Company's global five-year $1.350 billion credit agreement were $16.0 million with a weighted average interest rate of 0.9 percent. Short-term borrowings under various other foreign programs were $25.9 million with a weighted average interest rate of 13.1 percent. The Company had unused capacity of $1.334 billion at March 31, 2017 under the credit agreement. In April 2016, the Company entered into a $7.3 billion Bridge Loan and a $2.0 billion Term Loan as committed financing for the Valspar acquisition as disclosed in Note 17. No balances were drawn against these facilities as of March 31, 2017. During the first six months of 2016, in anticipation of a probable issuance of new long-term fixed rate debt within the next twelve months, the Company entered into a series of interest rate lock agreements (collectively, the interest rate locks) on a combined notional amount of $3.6 billion. The objective of the interest rate locks was to hedge the variability in the future semi-annual payments on the anticipated debt attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate (U.S. Treasury) during the hedge periods. The future semi-annual interest payments are exposed to interest rate risk due to changes in the benchmark interest rate from the inception of the hedge to the time of issuance. The interest rate locks were evaluated for hedge accounting treatment and were designated as cash flow hedges. The interest rate locks were settled in March 2017. The resulting pretax gain of $87.6 million was recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss as the Company expects to issue the new long-term fixed rate debt during the second quarter. There was no material ineffectiveness as of March 31, 2017. The unrealized gain recognized in Cumulative other comprehensive loss will be reclassified to Interest expense in periods following the issuance of the new debt. The Company expects to amortize unrealized gains of $6.9 million from Cumulative other comprehensive loss to Interest expense during the next twelve months.

In May 2016 and subsequently amended in 2017, the Company entered into a five-year $350.0 million credit agreement. The credit agreement will be used for general corporate purposes. There were no borrowings outstanding under this credit agreement at March 31, 2017. See Note 7, on pages 60 and 61, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for more information concerning the Company’s debt.

Long-term liabilities for postretirement benefits other than pensions did not change significantly from December 31, 2016 and from March 31, 2016. See Note 6, on pages 54 through 59, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for more information concerning the Company’s benefit plan obligations.

Other long-term liabilities at March 31, 2017 decreased $62.2 million in the first three months of 2017 primarily due to a decrease in non-current deferred tax liabilities, and decreased $95.0 million from a year ago primarily due to decreased non-current deferred tax liabilities offset by an increase in accruals for extended environmental-related liabilities.

Environmental-Related Liabilities

The operations of the Company, like those of other companies in the same industry, are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations not only govern current operations and products, but also impose potential liability on the Company for past operations. Management expects environmental laws and regulations to impose increasingly stringent requirements upon the Company and the industry in the future. Management believes that the Company conducts its operations in compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and has implemented various programs designed to protect the environment and promote continued compliance.

Depreciation of capital expenditures and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were included in the normal operating expenses of conducting business. The Company’s capital expenditures, depreciation and other expenses related to ongoing environmental compliance measures were not material to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations during the first three months of 2017. Management does not expect that such capital expenditures,

depreciation and other expenses will be material to the Company’s financial condition, liquidity, cash flow or results of operations in 2017. See Note 8 for further information on environmental-related long-term liabilities.

Contractual Obligations, Commercial Commitments and Warranties

Short-term borrowings increased $1.2 million to $41.9 million at March 31, 2017 from $40.7 million at December 31, 2016. Total long-term debt increased $0.5 million to $1.912 billion at March 31, 2017 from $1.912 billion at December 31, 2016, and increased $1.3 million from $1.911 billion at March 31, 2016. On March 19, 2016, the Company and Valspar entered into a definitive agreement under which the Company will acquire Valspar for $113 per share in an all cash transaction. The transaction is subject to certain conditions and regulatory approvals. On March 20, 2017, the end date of the definitive agreement was extended from the original end date of March 21, 2017 to June 21, 2017. On April 11, 2017, Sherwin-Williams and Valspar entered into a definitive agreement with Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. to divest the assets related to Valspar's North American industrial wood coatings business for approximately $420 million. The planned divestiture represents annual revenues below the $650 million threshold. Therefore, the acquisition is expected to be completed at a price of $113 per share. The completion of the acquisition remains subject to customary conditions, including the receipt of antitrust approvals. See Note 17 for more information. During the first six months of 2016, in anticipation of a probable issuance of new long-term fixed rate debt, the Company entered into a series of interest rate lock agreements on a combined notional amount of $3.6 billion. The interest rate locks were settled in March 2017. See Note 15 for more information. There have been no other significant changes to the Company’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments in the first quarter of 2017 as summarized in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Changes to the Company’s accrual for product warranty claims in the first three months of 2017 are disclosed in Note 5.

Litigation

See Note 9 for information concerning litigation.

Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ equity increased $186.9 million to $2.065 billion at March 31, 2017 from $1.878 billion at December 31, 2016 and increased $1.065 billion from $1.001 billion at March 31, 2016. The increase in Shareholders’ equity for the first three months of 2017 resulted primarily from net income of $239.2 million, an increase in Other capital of $59.1 million, resulting primarily from stock option exercises, partially offset by cash dividends paid on common stock of $79.5 million and an increase in Cumulative other comprehensive loss of $9.1 million. Since March 31, 2016, net income of $1.207 billion, an increase in Other capital of $175.0 million, and a decrease in Cumulative other comprehensive loss of $18.7 million more than offset cash dividends paid on common stock of $313.8 million in twelve months. During the first three months of 2017 and fiscal year 2016, the Company did not purchase any shares of its common stock for treasury purposes through open market purchases due to cash being accumulated in anticipation of the Valspar acquisition closing. The Company acquires its common stock for general corporate purposes, and depending on its cash position and market conditions, it may acquire additional shares in the future. The Company had remaining authorization at March 31, 2017 to purchase 11.65 million shares of its common stock. In February 2017, the Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend from $.84 per common share to $.85 per common share. This quarterly dividend will result in an annual dividend for 2017 of $3.40 per common share or a 28.4 percent payout of 2016 diluted net income per common share.

Cash Flow

Net operating cash improved $293.9 million in the first three months of 2017 to a cash source of $231.8 million from a cash usage of $62.1 million in 2016 primarily due to decreased cash used for working capital accounts and other assets and liabilities along with cash generated from increased net income and cash received of $87.6 million for the settlement of the interest rate lock agreements. Net investing cash usage decreased $31.6 million in the first three months of 2017 to a usage of $29.9 million from a usage of $61.5 million in 2016 primarily due to decreased cash used for capital expenditures and increased proceeds from sale of assets. Land and building of a Company owned distribution center was sold at approximately net book value during the first three months of 2017. Net financing cash usage increased $36.5 million to a usage of $60.1 million in the first three months of 2017 from a usage of $23.7 million in 2016 primarily due to decreased net proceeds from short-term borrowings partially offset by cash used for debt issuance costs of $43.7 million in the first three months of 2016. In the twelve month period from April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017, the Company generated net operating cash of $1.602 billion, used $272.1 million in investing activities and used $343.8 million in financing activities. In that same period, the Company invested $228.5 million in capital additions and improvements, paid $313.8 million in cash dividends to its shareholders of common stock, and decreased short-term borrowings by $86.3 million.

Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk associated with interest rate, foreign currency and commodity fluctuations. The Company occasionally utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy, but does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. In the first six months of 2016, the Company entered into forward currency exchange contracts with maturity dates of less than twelve months to hedge against value changes in foreign currency. The Company believes it may be exposed to continuing market risk from foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations. However, the Company does not expect that foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations or hedging contract losses will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Financial Covenant

Certain borrowings contain a consolidated leverage covenant. The covenant states the Company’s leverage ratio is not to exceed 3.50 to 1.00 (or 5.25 to 1.00 after pending acquisition close). The leverage ratio is defined as the ratio of total indebtedness (the sum of Short-term borrowings, Current portion of long-term debt and Long-term debt) at the reporting date to consolidated “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization” (EBITDA) for the twelve month period ended on the same date. Refer to the “Results of Operations” caption below for a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net income. At March 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with the covenant. The Company’s Notes, Debentures and revolving credit agreements contain various default and cross-default provisions. In the event of default under any one of these arrangements, acceleration of the maturity of any one or more of these borrowings may result. See Note 7, on pages 60 and 61, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for more information concerning the Company’s debt and related covenant.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Shown below are net sales and income before taxes by segment for the first quarter:



(Thousands of dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016		Change
Net Sales:
Paint Stores Group	$	1,810,357	$	1,615,307	12.1	%
Consumer Group	337,484		378,086		-10.7	%
Global Finishes Group	470,336		454,166		3.6	%
Latin America Coatings Group	141,389		125,187		12.9	%
Administrative	1,821		1,278		42.5	%
Total	$	2,761,387	$	2,574,024	7.3	%



(Thousands of dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			Change
Income Before Income Taxes:
Paint Stores Group	$	304,053		$	253,534		19.9	%
Consumer Group	60,591			63,964			-5.3	%
Global Finishes Group	52,435			48,582			7.9	%
Latin America Coatings Group	1,171			(928		)	226.2	%
Administrative	(111,645		)	(148,787		)	25.0	%
Total	$	306,605		$	216,365		41.7	%

Consolidated net sales increased in the first quarter of 2017 due primarily to higher paint sales volume in our Paint Stores Group and the impact of a change in revenue classification beginning in the third quarter of 2016 related to grossing up third-party service revenue and related costs which were previously netted and immaterial in prior periods. The change in revenue classification increased consolidated net sales in the quarter 2.2 percent. This prospective change primarily impacts the Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups. This change had no impact on operating profit, but reduced the operating margins of the affected Groups. Currency translation rate changes did not have a material impact on consolidated net sales in the quarter.

Net sales of all consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 4.6 percent to $419.0 million in the quarter versus $400.7 million in the same period last year. The increase in net sales for all consolidated foreign subsidiaries in the quarter was due primarily to price increases while foreign translation rate changes did not have a material impact. Net sales of all operations other than consolidated foreign subsidiaries were up 7.8 percent to $2.342 billion in the quarter as compared to $2.173 billion in the same period last year.

Net sales in the Paint Stores Group increased in the first quarter due primarily to higher architectural paint sales volume and the impact of the change in revenue classification. Net sales from stores open for more than twelve calendar months, excluding the change in revenue classification, increased 7.5 percent in the quarter compared to last year’s comparable period. Sales of non-paint products, excluding the change in revenue classification, increased by 6.1 percent over last year's first quarter. A discussion of changes in volume versus pricing for sales of products other than paint is not pertinent due to the wide assortment of general merchandise sold. Net sales of the Consumer Group decreased in the first quarter primarily due to lower volume sales to most of the Group’s retail and commercial customers. Net sales in the Global Finishes Group stated in U.S. dollars increased in the first quarter due primarily to higher paint sales volume and selling price increases. Net sales in the Latin America Coatings Group stated in U.S. dollars increased in the first quarter primarily due to selling price increases and favorable foreign currency translation rate changes partially offset by volume declines. Currency translation rate changes increased net sales by 5.7 percent in the quarter. Net sales in the Administrative segment, which primarily consist of external leasing revenue of excess headquarters space and leasing of facilities no longer used by the Company in its primary business, were essentially flat in the first quarter.

Consolidated gross profit increased $81.4 million in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to increased paint sales volume partially offset by higher raw material costs. Consolidated gross profit as a percent of consolidated net sales decreased in the first quarter of 2017 to 48.6 percent compared to 2016 at 49.0 percent due primarily to the impact of the change in revenue classification and higher raw material costs partially offset by increased paint volume.

The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit was higher than last year by $82.5 million in the first quarter due to higher paint sales volume. The Paint Stores Group’s gross profit margins decreased in the quarter, primarily due to the impact of the change in revenue classification and increased raw material costs only partially offset by increased paint sales volume. The Consumer Group’s gross profit decreased by $10.2 million in the quarter compared to the same period last year primarily due to lower sales and increased raw material costs. The Consumer Group’s gross profit margins were up as a percent of sales in the quarter compared to the same period last year due primarily to manufacturing efficiencies. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit increased $6.6 million in the first quarter compared to the same period last year, when stated in U.S. dollars, primarily due to selling price increases and sales volume partially offset by higher raw material costs. The Global Finishes Group’s gross profit margins were up as a percent of sales in the quarter compared to the same period last year due primarily for those same reasons. The Latin America Coatings Group’s gross profit increased by $4.9 million in the first quarter from the same period in the prior year, when stated in U.S. dollars, primarily due to selling price increases and favorable foreign currency translation rate changes partially offset by volume declines. The Administrative segment’s gross profit decreased by $2.4 million in the first quarter compared to the same period last year.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased $13.9 million in the first quarter of 2017 versus last year due primarily to increased expenses to support higher sales levels and net new store openings partially offset by lower expenses associated with the anticipated acquisition of Valspar. In the first quarter of 2017, expenses associated with the upcoming acquisition of Valspar were $5.0 million compared to $31.1 million in 2016. As a percent of sales, consolidated SG&A decreased slightly to 36.8 percent in the quarter of 2017 from 38.9 percent in the first quarter of 2016.

The Paint Stores Group’s SG&A increased $31.6 million in the first quarter due primarily to net new store openings and general comparable store expenses to support higher sales levels. The Consumer Group’s SG&A decreased $6.3 million in the quarter compared to the same period last year primarily due to good cost control. The Global Finishes Group’s SG&A increased $3.6 million in the quarter primarily due to supporting increased sales. The Latin America Coatings Group’s SG&A increased $5.5 million in the first quarter due to currency translation rate changes and timing of spending. The Administrative segment’s SG&A decreased $20.6 million in the first quarter primarily due to decreased costs associated with the anticipated acquisition of Valspar.

Interest expense was essentially flat in the first quarter of 2017 versus 2016 due to comparable amortization of credit facility costs incurred in early 2016 and stable debt levels.

Other general expense—net decreased $17.3 million in the first quarter due to decreased provisions for environmental expenses in the Administrative segment.

Other expense (income) —net improved $4.6 million in the first quarter as compared to 2016 primarily due to foreign currency transaction related gains in both Global Finishes and Latin America Coatings Groups in 2017.

Consolidated income before income taxes increased $90.2 million in the first quarter, primarily due to higher segment profits in the Paint Stores and Global Finishes Groups and lower expenses in the Administrative segment. The Administrative segment incurred the costs associated with the anticipated acquisition of Valspar and amortization of credit facility costs incurred in 2016 and related servicing fees totaling $13.0 million and $37.1 million for the first quarter in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The effective income tax rate for the first quarter of 2017 was 22.0 percent compared to 23.8 percent in 2016. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to a larger tax benefit from the Company's adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. Excluding the impact of ASU No. 2016-09, the effective income tax rate was 32.8 percent and 32.0 percent for the first quarter of 2017 and 2016.

Diluted net income per common share in the quarter increased to $2.53 per share from $1.75 per share in 2016, as restated due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. First quarter diluted net income per common share includes an increase of $.34 per share related to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 partially offset by an $.08 per share charge from Acquisition costs. First quarter diluted net income per common share in 2016 included a $.24 per share charge from Acquisition costs partially offset by an increase of $.18 per share related to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09.

Management considers a measurement that is not in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles a useful measurement of the operational profitability of the Company. Some investment professionals also utilize such a measurement as an indicator of the value of profits and cash that are generated strictly from operating activities, putting aside working capital and certain other balance sheet changes. For this measurement, management increases net income for significant non-operating and non-cash expense items to arrive at an amount known as “Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization” (EBITDA). The reader is cautioned that the following value for EBITDA should not be compared to other entities unknowingly. EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income or cash flows from operating activities as an indicator of operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. The reader should refer to the determination of net income and cash flows from operating activities in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles disclosed in the Statements of Consolidated Income and Comprehensive Income and Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. EBITDA as used by management is calculated as follows:



(Thousands of dollars)	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Net income	$	239,152	$	164,876
Interest expense	25,695		25,732
Income taxes	67,453		51,489
Depreciation	44,595		42,895
Amortization	6,182		5,782
EBITDA	$	383,077	$	290,774

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerning future events and conditions and may discuss, among other things, anticipated future performance (including sales and earnings), expected growth, future business plans and the costs and potential liability for environmental-related matters and the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation. Any statement that is not historical in nature is a forward-looking statement and may be identified by the use of words and phrases such as "believe," "expect," "may," "will," "should," "project," "could," "plan," "goal," "potential," "seek," "intend" or "anticipate" or the negative thereof or comparable terminology.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside our control that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements and from our historical results and experience. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include such things as:


•	general business conditions, strengths of retail and manufacturing economies and the growth in the coatings industry;


•	legal, regulatory and other matters that may affect the timing of our ability to complete the planned acquisition of The Valspar Corporation, or Valspar, if at all, including the potential for regulatory authorities to require divestitures in connection with the proposed transaction;


•	our ability to successfully integrate past and future acquisitions into our existing operations, including Valspar, as well as the performance of the businesses acquired;


•	risks inherent in the achievement of cost synergies and the timing thereof for the planned acquisition of Valspar;


•	competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation and quality;


•	changes in raw material and energy supplies and pricing;


•	changes in our relationships with customers and suppliers;


•	our ability to attain cost savings from productivity initiatives;


•	changes in general domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates, unemployment rates, higher labor and healthcare costs, recessions, and changing government policies, laws and regulations;


•	risks and uncertainties associated with our expansion into and our operations in Asia, Europe, South America and other foreign markets, including general economic conditions, inflation rates, recessions, foreign currency exchange rates, foreign investment and repatriation restrictions, legal and regulatory constraints, civil unrest and other external economic and political factors;


•	the achievement of growth in foreign markets, such as Asia, Europe and South America;


•	increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting health, safety and the environment;


•	inherent uncertainties involved in assessing our potential liability for environmental-related activities;


•	other changes in governmental policies, laws and regulations, including changes in accounting policies and standards and taxation requirements (such as new tax laws and new or revised tax law interpretations);


•	the nature, cost, quantity and outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims, including the lead pigment and lead-based paint litigation, and the effect of any legislation and administrative regulations relating thereto; and


•	unusual weather conditions.

Readers are cautioned that it is not possible to predict or identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results and that the above list should not be considered to be a complete list. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to market risk associated with interest rate, foreign currency and commodity fluctuations. The Company occasionally utilizes derivative instruments as part of its overall financial risk management policy, but does not use derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company enters into option and forward currency exchange contracts and commodity swaps to hedge against value changes in foreign currency and commodities. The Company believes it may experience continuing losses from foreign currency translation and commodity price fluctuations. However, the Company does not expect currency translation, transaction, commodity price fluctuations or hedging contract losses to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. There were no material changes in the Company’s exposure to market risk since the disclosure included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 and Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to our management including our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our Senior Vice President—Finance and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For information with respect to certain environmental-related matters and legal proceedings, see the information included under the captions entitled “Environmental-Related Liabilities” and “Litigation” of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Notes 8 and 9 of the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

A summary of the repurchase activity for the Company’s first quarter is as follows:



Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan	Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
January 1 - January 31
	Share repurchase program ⁽¹⁾					11,650,000
	Employee transactions ⁽²⁾	1,329	$	300.12		NA

February 1 - February 28
	Employee transactions ⁽²⁾	72,484	$	311.37		NA

March 1 - March 31
	Employee transactions ⁽²⁾	460	311.12			NA
Total
	Share repurchase program⁽¹⁾					11,650,000
	Employee transactions⁽²⁾	74,273	$	311.17		NA


⁽¹⁾	All shares were purchased through the Company’s publicly announced share repurchase program. There is no expiration date specified for the program. The Company had remaining authorization at March 31, 2017 to purchase 11,650,000 shares.


⁽²⁾	All shares were delivered to satisfy the exercise price and/or tax withholding obligations by employees who exercised stock options or had shares of restricted stock vest.

Item 5. Other Information.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved permitted non-audit services to be performed by Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. These non-audit services were approved within categories related to domestic advisory tax and tax compliance services and international tax compliance.

Item 6. Exhibits.




4.1	Amendment No. 4 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2017, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.2	Amendment No. 5 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2017, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.3	Amendment No. 6 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2017, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.

10.1	The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Director Deferred Fee Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of April 18, 2017) (filed herewith).

10.2	The Sherwin-Williams Company 2007 Executive Annual Performance Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 19, 2017) (filed herewith).

10.3	The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 19, 2017) (filed herewith).

31(a)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith).

31(b)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith).

32(a)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (furnished herewith).

32(b)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (furnished herewith).

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY

April 21, 2017	By:	/s/ Jane M. Cronin
April 21, 2017		Jane M. Cronin
		Senior Vice President-Corporate Controller

April 21, 2017	By:	/s/ Catherine M. Kilbane
April 21, 2017		Catherine M. Kilbane
		Senior Vice President, General
		Counsel and Secretary



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description
4.1	Amendment No. 4 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2017, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.2	Amendment No. 5 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 13, 2017, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 13, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.

4.3	Amendment No. 6 to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2017, by and among the Company, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and issuing bank, and the lenders party thereto, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.

10.1	The Sherwin-Williams Company 2005 Director Deferred Fee Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of April 18, 2017) (filed herewith).

10.2	The Sherwin-Williams Company 2007 Executive Annual Performance Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 19, 2017) (filed herewith).

10.3	The Sherwin-Williams Company 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (Amended and Restated as of April 19, 2017) (filed herewith).

31(a)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith).

31(b)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith).

32(a)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (furnished herewith).

32(b)	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (furnished herewith).

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document