e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 2, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 000-24923
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1799439 |
(State of incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
4000 MacArthur Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92660-3095
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(949) 483-4600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of
August 2, 2010, there were 81,269,042 shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities
laws. Any statements that do not relate to historical or current facts or matters are
forward-looking statements. You can identify some of the forward-looking statements by the use of
forward-looking words, such as may, will, could, project, believe, anticipate,
expect, estimate, continue, potential, plan, forecasts, and the like, the negatives of
such expressions, or the use of future tense. Statements concerning current conditions may also be
forward-looking if they imply a continuation of current conditions. Examples of forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the market share of our products, growth in the markets we serve and our market
opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding price and product competition; |
|
|
|
|
continued demand and future growth in demand for our products in the communications, PC and consumer markets we serve; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the declines in our legacy products; |
|
|
|
|
our plans and expectations regarding the transition of our semiconductor products to smaller line width geometries; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to sustain the recoverability of our goodwill, intangible and tangible long-term assets; |
|
|
|
|
our product development plans; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the sale of our real property in Newport Beach; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that our largest customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenue; |
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding our contractual obligations and commitments; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to protect our products and services with proprietary technology and intellectual
property protection; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to meet our lease obligations (and other financial commitments); |
|
|
|
|
our expectations, subject to the qualifications expressed, regarding the sufficiency of our existing sources of
liquidity, together with cash expected to be generated from operations, to fund our operations, research and development, anticipated
capital expenditures, and working capital for at least the next twelve months; |
|
|
|
|
our expectation that we will be able to continue to rely on third party manufacturers to manufacture, assemble and test
our products to meet our customers demands; and |
|
|
|
|
our expectations that we will be able to use our net operating losses and other tax attributes to offset future taxable
income. |
Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to
carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and other factors that may affect our
business and operating results, including, but not limited to, those made in Part II, Item 1A of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and any of those made in our other reports filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Please consider our forward-looking statements in light
of those risks as you read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document. We
do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to publish revised forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
1
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except for par value amount)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
125,385 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
23,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
Receivables, net of allowances of $419 and $453 at July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, respectively |
|
|
36,226 |
|
|
|
30,110 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
9,314 |
|
|
|
9,216 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
21,651 |
|
|
|
26,148 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
12,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
148,815 |
|
|
|
199,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $31,390 and $70,139
at July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, respectively |
|
|
6,397 |
|
|
|
15,299 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
109,908 |
|
|
|
109,908 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
40,869 |
|
|
|
25,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
305,989 |
|
|
$ |
350,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,400 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
10,836 |
|
|
|
28,653 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
15,989 |
|
|
|
24,553 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
8,728 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
35,179 |
|
|
|
33,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
68,579 |
|
|
|
157,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
173,462 |
|
|
|
228,578 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
60,451 |
|
|
|
62,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
302,492 |
|
|
|
447,979 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity (deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and junior preferred stock: 20,000 and 5,000 shares authorized, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 200,000 shares authorized; 81,208 and 56,917
shares issued and outstanding at July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, respectively |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,917,855 |
|
|
|
4,833,919 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,917,983 |
) |
|
|
(4,929,743 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
(2,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
3,497 |
|
|
|
(97,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
305,989 |
|
|
$ |
350,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts reflect the retrospective application of the accounting guidance
for convertible debt instruments adopted effective October 3, 2009 (See Note 3). |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
$ |
60,730 |
|
|
$ |
50,844 |
|
|
$ |
184,411 |
|
|
$ |
152,272 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
23,645 |
|
|
|
20,533 |
|
|
|
71,936 |
|
|
|
64,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
37,085 |
|
|
|
30,311 |
|
|
|
112,475 |
|
|
|
87,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
14,569 |
|
|
|
12,450 |
|
|
|
41,914 |
|
|
|
38,783 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
11,647 |
|
|
|
14,813 |
|
|
|
36,730 |
|
|
|
49,739 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
Gain on sale of intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,858 |
) |
Special charges |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
13,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
27,224 |
|
|
|
29,013 |
|
|
|
80,468 |
|
|
|
91,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
9,861 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
32,007 |
|
|
|
(4,001 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
8,449 |
|
|
|
24,437 |
|
|
|
25,708 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
9,248 |
|
|
|
(3,567 |
) |
|
|
(5,711 |
) |
|
|
(3,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income
taxes and (loss) income on equity method investments |
|
|
(6,546 |
) |
|
|
(3,584 |
) |
|
|
13,281 |
|
|
|
(26,254 |
) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before loss on equity method
investments |
|
|
(6,868 |
) |
|
|
(3,760 |
) |
|
|
12,858 |
|
|
|
(27,073 |
) |
Loss on equity method investments |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(485 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(6,998 |
) |
|
|
(4,245 |
) |
|
|
12,483 |
|
|
|
(29,239 |
) |
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(455 |
) |
|
|
3,557 |
|
|
|
(723 |
) |
|
|
(9,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(7,453 |
) |
|
$ |
(688 |
) |
|
$ |
11,760 |
|
|
$ |
(38,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income per share from continuing operations basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
(0.59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income per share from discontinued operations basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in basic per-share computations |
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
|
49,867 |
|
|
|
70,120 |
|
|
|
49,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in diluted per-share computations |
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
|
49,867 |
|
|
|
70,964 |
|
|
|
49,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts reflect the retrospective application of the accounting guidance
for convertible debt instruments adopted effective October 3, 2009 (See Note
3). |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 (1) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
11,760 |
|
|
$ |
(38,793 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
6,595 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
Reversal of provision for bad debts, net |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
Charges for inventory provisions, net |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
|
10,426 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
5,359 |
|
Increase in fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
(11,353 |
) |
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
Losses on equity method investments |
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
3,046 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,635 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of cost method investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
Loss on termination of swap |
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
18,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(12,911 |
) |
|
|
(1,856 |
) |
Gain on resolution of pre-acquisition contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
Gain on sale of intellectual property |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,858 |
) |
Other items, net |
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
|
|
1,422 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(6,082 |
) |
|
|
8,634 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
18,009 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(9,405 |
) |
|
|
(7,808 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(15,435 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(1,896 |
) |
|
|
16,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
6,280 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
(555 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from resolution of pre-acquisition contingency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
Payments for acquisitions |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities |
|
|
88,634 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
Purchases of marketable securities |
|
|
(95,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Release of restricted cash |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
12,570 |
|
Proceeds from sale of intellectual property, net of expenses of $132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
27,481 |
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments of short-term debt, including debt costs of $483 and $901 |
|
|
(29,136 |
) |
|
|
(10,279 |
) |
Extinguishment of debt, including costs of $3,445 |
|
|
(288,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from common stock offerings, net of expenses of $4,881 and $0 |
|
|
62,510 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior secured notes, net of expenses of $4,918 |
|
|
168,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock plans |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares upon exercise of employee stock awards |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap security deposit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
Repayment of shareholder note receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(86,947 |
) |
|
|
(10,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(79,587 |
) |
|
|
17,511 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
125,385 |
|
|
|
105,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
123,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts reflect the retrospective application of the accounting guidance
for convertible debt instruments adopted effective October 3, 2009 (See Note 3). |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Description of Business
Conexant Systems, Inc. (Conexant, the Company, we, us or our) designs, develops and
sells semiconductor system solutions, comprised of semiconductor devices, software and reference
designs, for imaging, audio, embedded-modem, and video applications. These solutions include a
comprehensive portfolio of imaging solutions for multifunction printers (MFPs), fax platforms, and
connected frame market segments. The Companys audio solutions include high-definition (HD) audio
integrated circuits, HD audio codecs, and speakers-on-a-chip solutions for personal computers
(PCs), PC peripheral sound systems, audio subsystems, speakers, notebook docking stations,
voice-over-IP speakerphones, intercom, door phone, and audio-enabled surveillance applications. The
Company also offers a full suite of embedded-modem solutions for set-top boxes, point-of-sale
systems, home automation and security systems, and desktop and notebook PCs. Additional products
include decoders and media bridges for video surveillance and security applications, and system
solutions for analog video-based multimedia applications.
2. Sale of Assets and Discontinued Operations
Sale of Property
In November 2009, the Company committed to a plan for the sale of certain of the Companys property
located on Jamboree Road adjacent to its Newport Beach, California headquarters. The property
consists of an approximately 25-acre site, including two leased buildings, certain personal
property on the site, and all easements and other intangible rights appurtenant to the property.
The Company determined that this property met the criteria for held for sale in accordance with
the accounting guidance for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and has presented the
respective group of assets separately on the face of the consolidated balance sheet as of July 2,
2010.
Sale of Broadband Access Business
On August 24, 2009, the Company completed the sale of its Broadband Access (BBA) business to
Ikanos Communications, Inc. (Ikanos). The results of the BBA business have been reported as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Interest expense has been allocated based on the accounting guidance for allocation of interest to
discontinued operations. For the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009, interest
expense allocated to discontinued operations was $0.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
For the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010, there were no BBA revenues and pretax income classified
as discontinued operations was $0.1 million. For the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009, BBA
revenues and pretax income classified as discontinued operations was $33.8 million and $3.6
million, respectively.
For the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, BBA revenues and pretax income classified as
discontinued operations was $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively. For the nine fiscal months
ended July 3, 2009, BBA revenues and pretax loss classified as discontinued operations was $93.3
million and $2.8 million, respectively.
The Company has entered into a short-term transitional services agreement (TSA) with Ikanos which
provides for ongoing logistical support by the Company to Ikanos, for which Ikanos will reimburse
the Company. As of July 2, 2010, the Company had a receivable under the TSA from Ikanos of
approximately $0.6 million, which is classified in other current assets.
Sale of Broadband Media Processing Business
On August 8, 2008, the Company completed the sale of its Broadband Media Processing (BMP)
business to NXP B.V. (NXP). The results of the BMP business have been reported as discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
For the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010, there were no BMP revenues and the pretax loss
classified as discontinued operations was $0.5 million. For the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009,
there were no BMP revenues and pretax income classified as discontinued operations was $0.1
million.
For the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, there were no BMP revenues and the pretax loss
classified as discontinued operations was $1.4 million. For the nine fiscal months ended July 3,
2009, BMP revenues and pretax loss classified as discontinued operations were $3.0 million and $6.0
million, respectively.
The Company anticipates it will continue to accumulate pretax losses in discontinued operations due
to accretion on lease liabilities from restructured facilities related to the BMP business.
6
3. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Interim Reporting The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended October 2, 2009 and the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 8, 2010.
The financial information presented in the accompanying statements reflects all adjustments that
are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the periods indicated. All
such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements. Prior year quarterly information has been recast to
reflect the reclassification of discontinued operations described in Note 2 and the retrospective
application of the accounting guidance for convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly
or partially in cash on conversion, adopted effective October 3, 2009.
Fiscal Periods The Companys fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Friday
closest to September 30. In a 52-week year, each fiscal quarter consists of 13 weeks. The
additional week in a 53-week year is added to the fourth quarter, making such quarter consist of 14
weeks. Fiscal 2010 consists of, and fiscal 2009 consisted of, 52 weeks.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Among the significant estimates affecting the consolidated financial
statements are those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, reserves
related to inventories and sales returns, long-lived assets (including goodwill and intangible
assets), deferred income taxes, valuation of warrants, stock-based compensation and restructuring
charges. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates based upon currently available
information. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the sales price and terms are fixed and
determinable, and (iv) the collection of the receivable is reasonably assured. These terms are
typically met upon shipment of product to the customer. The majority of the Companys distributors
have limited stock rotation rights, which allow them to rotate up to 10% of product in their
inventory two times per year. The Company recognizes revenue to these distributors upon shipment of
product to the distributor, as the stock rotation rights are limited and the Company believes that
it has the ability to reasonably estimate and establish allowances for expected product returns in
accordance with the accounting guidance for revenue recognition when right of return exists.
Development revenue is recognized when services are performed and was not significant for any
periods presented.
Marketable Securities The Company defines marketable securities as income yielding debt
securities that can be readily converted into cash and equity securities acquired through strategic
non-marketable investments that subsequently became listed on public markets. All of the Companys
marketable debt securities are U.S. Treasury obligations rated Aaa or AAA by the major credit
rating agencies.
The Company accounts for its investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale and
determines the appropriate classification of such securities at the time of purchase and
re-evaluates such classification as of each balance sheet date. Marketable securities are reported
at fair value with the related unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), a component of shareholders equity (deficit), on the Companys
consolidated balance sheets. Realized gains and losses were included in other expense (income), net
in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations. Gains and losses on the sale
of available-for-sale securities were determined using the specific-identification method. The
Company did not hold any securities for speculative or trading purposes.
Restricted Cash Upon the expiration of the Companys $50 million credit facility and repayment
of the amount owed under the agreement, $8.5 million of restricted cash included in the
consolidated balance sheets as of October 2, 2009 was released back to the Company.
The Company has outstanding letters of credit collateralized by restricted cash aggregating $5.9
million to secure various long-term operating leases and the Companys self-insured workers
compensation plan. The restricted cash associated with these letters of credit is classified as
other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Inventories On a quarterly basis, the Company also assesses the net realizable value of its
inventories. When the estimated average selling prices, less cost to sell its inventory, falls
below its inventory cost, the Company adjusts its inventory to its current estimated market value.
Lower of cost or market adjustments may be required based upon actual average selling prices and
changes to the Companys current estimates, which could impact the Companys gross margin
percentage. There were no lower of cost or market adjustments in the fiscal quarters ended July 2,
2010 and July 3, 2009 or the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009.
7
Assets Held for Sale The Company evaluates the asset at the time an asset qualifies for held
for sale criteria, to determine whether or not the carrying value exceeds its fair value less cost
to sell. Any loss as a result of the carrying value being in excess of fair value less cost to sell
is recorded in the period the assets meet the criteria. Management judgment is required to assess
whether the criteria is met and estimate the expected net amount recoverable upon sale. As of July
2, 2010, the carrying values of the respective assets held for sale did not exceed their fair
values less costs to sell.
Accounting for Convertible Debt On October 3, 2009, the Company adopted the accounting guidance
for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial
cash settlement). The accounting guidance requires the issuer to separately account for the
liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments in a manner that reflects the
issuers hypothetical nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The guidance resulted in the Company
recognizing higher interest expense in the statement of operations due to amortization of the
discount that results from separating the liability and equity components. The provisions of the
accounting guidance were retrospectively applied, and all prior period amounts have been adjusted
to apply the method of accounting.
The accounting guidance applies to our 4.00% convertible subordinated notes issued in 2006. In
March 2006, the Company issued $200.0 million principal amount of 4.00% convertible subordinated
notes due March 2026 (convertible notes) and, in May 2006, the initial purchaser of the
convertible notes exercised its option to purchase an additional $50.0 million principal amount of
the convertible notes. Total proceeds to the Company from these issuances, net of issuance costs,
were $243.6 million. The convertible notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company.
Interest on the convertible notes is payable in arrears semiannually on each March 1 and September
1, beginning on September 1, 2006. The notes are convertible, at the option of the holder upon
satisfaction of certain conditions, into shares of the Companys common stock at a conversion price
of $49.20 per share, subject to adjustment for certain events. Upon conversion, the Company has the
right to deliver, in lieu of common stock, cash or a combination of cash and common stock.
Beginning on March 1, 2011, the convertible notes may be redeemed at the Companys option at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. Holders may
require the Company to repurchase, for cash, all or part of their convertible notes on March 1,
2011, March 1, 2016 and March 1, 2021 at a price of 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued
and unpaid interest.
The Company applied the accounting guidance to measure the fair value of the liability component of
the convertible notes using a discounted cash flow model. The Company assessed the expected life
and approximate discount rate of the liability component to be 5.0 years and 11.8% for the $200.0
million convertible notes and 4.8 years and 10.3% for the $50.0 million convertible notes, based on
yields of similarly rated nonconvertible instruments. The Company determined the carrying amount of
the equity component by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal
amount of the convertible notes. Since the Companys effective tax rate is zero, there was no tax
effect for the temporary basis difference associated with the liability component of the
convertible notes. The Company amortizes the transaction costs related to the liability component
to interest expense over the expected life of the convertible notes.
The adoption of the accounting guidance for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in
cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) resulted in the following amounts
recognized in our financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal of the liability component of 4.00% convertible
subordinated notes |
|
$ |
11,218 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
Unamortized debt discount |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(21,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount of liability component of 4.00%
convertible subordinated notes |
|
$ |
10,836 |
|
|
$ |
228,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount of equity component of 4.00% convertible
subordinated notes (net of $1,742 issuance costs) |
|
$ |
66,045 |
|
|
$ |
66,045 |
|
Interest expense related to the 4.00% convertible subordinated notes (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Contractual interest coupon |
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
$ |
5,271 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
Amortization of the debt discount on the liability component |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
7,683 |
|
|
|
10,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,239 |
|
|
$ |
6,031 |
|
|
$ |
12,954 |
|
|
$ |
17,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective interest rate for the liability component for the period |
|
|
9.63 |
% |
|
|
9.65 |
% |
|
|
9.89 |
% |
|
|
9.56 |
% |
8
The estimated amortization expense for the debt discount for the 4.00% convertible subordinated
notes through the remaining expected life of 8 months is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2010 |
|
FY 2011 |
Estimated debt discount amortization expense |
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
The adoption of the accounting guidance requires the retrospective application to all periods
presented as of the beginning of the first period presented. As of October 3, 2009, the accounting
guidance was adopted and comparative financial statements for prior periods have been adjusted to
apply it retrospectively. The line items for the financial statements that are affected by the
change in accounting principle are indicated below (in thousands):
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Change |
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
199,359 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
199,359 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
15,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,299 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
109,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,908 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
26,284 |
|
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
25,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
350,850 |
|
|
$ |
(649 |
) |
|
$ |
350,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
$ |
157,312 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
157,312 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
(21,422 |
) |
|
|
228,578 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
62,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
469,401 |
|
|
|
(21,422 |
) |
|
|
447,979 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders deficit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred and junior preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
4,767,874 |
|
|
|
66,045 |
|
|
|
4,833,919 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,884,471 |
) |
|
|
(45,272 |
) |
|
|
(4,929,743 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,524 |
) |
Shareholder notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders deficit |
|
|
(118,551 |
) |
|
|
20,773 |
|
|
|
(97,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders deficit |
|
$ |
350,850 |
|
|
$ |
(649 |
) |
|
$ |
350,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended July 3, 2009 |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended July 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
As |
|
|
As |
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Adjusted |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
5,035 |
|
|
$ |
3,414 |
|
|
$ |
8,449 |
|
|
$ |
15,634 |
|
|
$ |
10,074 |
|
|
$ |
25,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and (loss) gain
on equity method investments |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(3,414 |
) |
|
|
(3,584 |
) |
|
|
(16,180 |
) |
|
|
(10,074 |
) |
|
|
(26,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before (loss) gain on equity method
investments |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(3,414 |
) |
|
|
(3,760 |
) |
|
|
(16,999 |
) |
|
|
(10,074 |
) |
|
|
(27,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(831 |
) |
|
|
(3,414 |
) |
|
|
(4,245 |
) |
|
|
(19,165 |
) |
|
|
(10,074 |
) |
|
|
(29,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
2,726 |
|
|
$ |
(3,414 |
) |
|
$ |
(688 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,719 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,074 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended July 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
As Reported |
|
|
Effect of Change |
|
|
As Adjusted |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(28,719 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,074 |
) |
|
$ |
(38,793 |
) |
Debt discount amortization |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,426 |
|
|
$ |
10,426 |
|
Other items, net |
|
$ |
1,773 |
|
|
$ |
(352 |
) |
|
$ |
1,421 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
(0 |
) |
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments The Companys derivative financial instruments as of July 2,
2010 principally consisted of the Companys warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed
Technologies, Inc. (Mindspeed) common stock (See Note 5).
Supplemental Cash Flow Information Cash paid for interest was $7.0 million and $12.4 million for
the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. Cash paid for income
taxes for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 was $2.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Non-cash financing activity associated with the
accrued purchase of property, plant and equipment was $0.8 million for the nine fiscal months ended
July 2, 2010.
Net (Loss) income Per Share Net (loss) income per share is computed in accordance with the
accounting guidance for earnings per share. Basic net (loss) income per share is computed by
dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted net (loss) income per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive securities
outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive securities include stock options, restricted
stock units and shares of stock issuable upon conversion of the Companys convertible notes. The
dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock units is computed under the treasury stock
method, and the dilutive effect of convertible notes is computed using the if-converted method.
Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computations of diluted net (loss) income per
share if their effect would be antidilutive.
The following potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the diluted net (loss) income
per share calculations because their effect would have been antidilutive (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
July 2, |
|
July 3, |
|
July 2, |
|
July 3, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
3,301 |
|
|
|
5,905 |
|
4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026 |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
5,081 |
|
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
5,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
10,135 |
|
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
|
10,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following potentially dilutive securities have been included in the diluted net (loss) income
per share calculations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
July 2, |
|
July 3, |
|
July 2, |
|
July 3, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for basic net (loss) income per share |
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
|
49,867 |
|
|
|
70,120 |
|
|
|
49,760 |
|
Employee stock options and restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares for diluted (loss) income per share |
|
|
81,200 |
|
|
|
49,867 |
|
|
|
70,964 |
|
|
|
49,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions In the fiscal quarter ended January 2, 2009, the Company acquired certain assets
from Analog Devices Inc. (ADI) used in the operation of ADIs Integrated Audio Group (ADI
Audio) and a license to manufacture and sell certain products related to ADI Audio. Payments
through July 2, 2010 for the acquired assets totaled $3.8 million.
Goodwill Goodwill is tested annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and, if necessary, whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. During
the third fiscal quarter of 2010, based on current business forecasts, the Company determined there
were no indicators of impairment and therefore no interim goodwill impairment analysis was
considered necessary for this period.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
On October 3, 2009, the Company adopted accounting guidance for convertible debt instruments that
may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement), which requires the
issuer to separately account for the liability and equity components of convertible debt
instruments in a manner that reflects the issuers hypothetical nonconvertible debt borrowing rate.
The guidance resulted in the Company recognizing higher interest expense in the statement of
operations due to amortization of the discount that
10
results from separating the liability and
equity components. The provisions of the accounting guidance were retrospectively applied, and all
prior period amounts have been adjusted to apply the new method of accounting.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for the accounting of transfers of financial assets.
This guidance improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the
information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of
financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.
This accounting guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
not permitted. The Company does not believe that adoption of this guidance will have a material
impact on its financial position and results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued revised guidance for the accounting of variable interest entities,
which replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards approach with a qualitative approach that
focuses on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable
interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. This accounting
guidance also requires an ongoing reassessment of whether an entity is the primary beneficiary and
requires additional disclosures about an enterprises involvement in variable interest entities.
This accounting guidance will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
not permitted. The Company does not believe that adoption of this guidance will have a material
impact on its financial position and results of operations.
4. Fair Value of Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities
In accordance with the accounting guidance for fair value measurements, the following represents
the Companys fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of July 2, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
20,079 |
|
|
|
23,345 |
|
Mindspeed warrant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,407 |
|
|
|
16,407 |
|
Long-term restricted cash |
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
54,963 |
|
|
$ |
36,486 |
|
|
$ |
91,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1assets consist of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash and
marketable securities with a market value listed from a stock exchange.
Level 2 assets consist of the Companys marketable debt securities, whose values are based on
broker or dealer quotes or the pricing of a similar security, and the Companys warrant to purchase
approximately 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at an exercise price of $16.74 per share
through June 2013. See Note 5 for the fair valuation of these warrants.
The Company had no financial assets or liabilities classified as Level 3 as of July 2, 2010.
The fair value of other financial instruments, which consist of the Companys 4.00% convertible
subordinated notes due March 2026 and the Companys 11.25% senior secured notes due 2015, was $11.2
million (for the 4.00% convertible subordinated notes) and $175.9 million (for the 11.25% senior
secured notes) as of July 2, 2010. The fair value of the 4.00% convertible subordinated notes was
calculated using a quoted market price in an active market. The fair value of the 11.25% senior
secured notes is based on an indicative bid price provided by the underwriter of the senior secured
notes.
5. Supplemental Financial Information
Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
$ |
5,980 |
|
|
$ |
5,002 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
3,334 |
|
|
|
4,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
9,314 |
|
|
$ |
9,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
At July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, inventories were net of excess and obsolete inventory reserves
of $3.2 million and $6.4 million, respectively.
During the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, the Company recorded $0.3 million
and $0.6 million of charges, respectively, for excess and obsolete (E&O) inventory. During the
nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, the charges recorded were $1.4 million and
$1.9 million, respectively, for E&O inventory.
The Company reviews its E&O inventory balances at a product level on a quarterly basis and
regularly evaluates the disposition of all E&O inventory products. During the fiscal quarter ended
July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, the reserved products sold were $0.3 million and $0.4 million,
respectively. During the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, the reserved
products sold were $1.3 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2010 |
|
|
October 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
Product licenses |
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
(628 |
) |
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
6,830 |
|
|
|
(3,726 |
) |
|
|
3,104 |
|
|
|
6,830 |
|
|
|
(3,045 |
) |
|
|
3,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
$ |
(4,638 |
) |
|
$ |
4,592 |
|
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
$ |
(3,673 |
) |
|
$ |
5,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets are amortized over a weighted-average remaining period of approximately 4.7
years. Annual amortization expense is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
Thereafter |
Amortization expense |
|
$ |
284 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
Assets Held for Sale
The cost of the assets classified as held for sale consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,662 |
|
Land and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
307 |
|
Buildings, net |
|
|
5,312 |
|
Machinery and equipment, net |
|
|
268 |
|
Site development costs |
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects that the sale of these assets will be completed within approximately a
one-year time period from the respective period that they met the held for sale criteria.
Mindspeed Warrant
The Company has a warrant to purchase approximately 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at
an exercise price of $16.74 per share through June 2013. At July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, the
market value of Mindspeed common stock was $6.67 and $3.05 per share, respectively. The Company
accounts for the Mindspeed warrant as a derivative instrument, and changes in the fair value of the
warrant are included in other expense (income), net for each period. At July 2, 2010 and October 2,
2009, the aggregate fair value of the Mindspeed warrant included on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets was $16.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively. At July 2, 2010, the warrant was
valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton model with an expected term of 3 years, expected volatility
of 96%, a risk-free interest rate of approximately 1.0% and no dividend yield. The aggregate fair
value of the warrant is reflected as a long-term asset on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets because the Company does not intend to liquidate any portion of the warrant in the next
twelve months.
The valuation of this derivative instrument is subjective, and option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Changes in
these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. The Company could, at any point in
time, ultimately realize amounts significantly different than the carrying value.
12
Debt
Debt consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026, net of debt discount of $0.4 million (1) |
|
$ |
10,836 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts receivable financing facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,653 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
10,836 |
|
|
$ |
90,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Floating rate senior secured notes due November 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
61,400 |
|
4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026, net of debt discount of $21.4 million (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
228,578 |
|
11.25% senior secured notes due March 2015, net of discount of $1,538 |
|
|
173,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
173,462 |
|
|
|
289,978 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
173,462 |
|
|
$ |
228,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts reflect the retrospective application of the accounting
guidance for convertible debt instruments adopted effective
October 3, 2009 (See Note 3). |
11.25% senior secured notes due 2015 In March 2010, the Company issued $175.0 million aggregate
principal amount of senior secured notes due 2015 (senior notes) that mature on March 15, 2015.
The senior notes were sold at 99.06% of the principal amount, resulting in gross proceeds of
approximately $173.4 million. Deferred debt offering expenses were approximately $4.9 million, and
are being amortized over the term of the debt. The senior notes have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be sold in the United States absent registration or
an applicable exemption from registration requirements. The senior notes accrue interest at a rate
of 11.25% per annum payable semiannually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on
September 15, 2010. The senior notes mature on March 15, 2015. The obligations under the senior
notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior secured basis,
by all of the Companys existing domestic subsidiaries (except for Conexant CF, LLC) and by all of
the Companys future domestic subsidiaries (except for immaterial subsidiaries and receivables
financing subsidiaries). Conexant CF, LLC is the Companys receivables financing subsidiary. In
addition, the senior notes and the note guarantees are secured by liens on substantially all of the
Companys and the guarantors tangible and intangible property, subject to certain exceptions and
permitted liens. On or after March 15, 2013, the Company may redeem all or a part of the senior
notes at a price of 105.625% of the principal amount of the senior notes during the remainder of
2013 and 100.00% of the principal amount of the senior notes thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. In addition, at any time prior to March 15,
2013, the Company may, on one or more occasions, redeem all or a part of the senior notes at any
time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes redeemed, plus
a make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption
date. On or after January 1, 2011 until March 15, 2013, the Company may also redeem up to 35% of
the original aggregate principal amount of the senior notes, using the proceeds of certain
qualified equity offerings, at a redemption price of 111.25% of the principal amount thereof, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. If a change of control
occurs, the Company must offer to repurchase the senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 101%
of the principal amount of the senior notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the applicable repurchase date. In addition, certain asset dispositions will be triggering
events that may require the Company to use the proceeds from those sales to make an offer to
repurchase the senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
senior notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable repurchase
date if such proceeds are not otherwise invested in the Companys business within a specific period
of time. The senior notes and the note guarantees rank senior to all of the Companys and the
guarantors existing and future subordinated indebtedness, including the convertible notes, but
they are structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities
(including non-trade payables) of the Companys non-guarantor subsidiaries.
Floating rate senior secured notes due November 2010 In December 2009, the Company repurchased
all outstanding floating rate senior secured notes due November 2010 at a price of 101% of par and
recorded a loss on extinguishment of $0.6 million. The notes were guaranteed by certain of the
Companys U.S. subsidiaries. The guarantee was released on December 22, 2009.
13
4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026 In March 2006, the Company issued $200.0
million principal amount of convertible notes and, in May 2006, the initial purchaser of the
convertible notes exercised its option to purchase an additional $50.0 million principal amount of
the convertible notes. Total proceeds to the Company from these issuances, net of issuance costs,
were $243.6 million. The convertible notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company.
Interest on the convertible notes is payable in arrears semiannually on each March 1 and September
1, beginning on September 1, 2006. The convertible notes are convertible, at the option of the
holder upon satisfaction of certain conditions, into shares of the Companys common stock at a
conversion price of $49.20 per share, subject to adjustment for certain events. Upon conversion,
the Company has the right to deliver, in lieu of common stock, cash or a combination of cash and
common stock. Beginning on March 1, 2011, the convertible notes may be redeemed at the Companys
option at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
Holders may require the Company to repurchase, for cash, all or part of their convertible notes on
March 1, 2011, March 1, 2016 and March 1, 2021 at a price of 100% of the principal amount, plus any
accrued and unpaid interest.
During the fiscal quarter and nine months ended July 2, 2010, the Company extinguished
approximately $116.5 and $238.8 million of its convertible
notes. As a result of the extinguishment,
the Company included $5.8 million and $13.4 million of unamortized debt discount in the loss on
extinguishment during the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010. The remaining $10.8 million balance of 4.00% convertible subordinated notes, net
of unamortized debt discount of $0.4 million, is classified as short term.
Accounts
Receivable Financing Facility On November 29, 2005, the Company established an accounts receivable financing facility whereby it
sold, from time to time, certain accounts receivable to Conexant USA, LLC (Conexant USA), a
special purpose entity that was a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. Under the terms of the
Companys agreements with Conexant USA, the Company retained the responsibility to service and
collect accounts receivable sold to Conexant USA and received a weekly fee from Conexant USA for
handling administrative matters, which equaled to 1.0%, on a per annum basis, of the uncollected
value of the accounts receivable. The Companys $50.0 million credit facility secured by the assets
of Conexant USA expired on November 27, 2009. All amounts owed on the credit facility were repaid
as of January 1, 2010. Conexant USA was merged into Conexant CF in the fiscal quarter ended July 2,
2010.
On December 22, 2009, the Company established a new accounts receivable financing facility whereby
it sells, from time to time, certain accounts receivable to Conexant CF, LLC (Conexant CF), a
special purpose entity which is a consolidated subsidiary of the Company. Under the terms of the
Companys agreements with Conexant CF, the Company retains the responsibility to service and
collect accounts receivable sold to Conexant CF and receives a weekly fee from Conexant CF for
handling administrative matters which is equal to 1.0%, on a per annum basis, of the uncollected
value of the purchased accounts receivable.
Concurrently with entering into the new accounts receivable financing facility, Conexant CF entered
into a new credit facility with a bank to finance the cash portion of the purchase price of
eligible receivables. The new credit facility is secured by the assets of Conexant CF. Conexant CF
is required to maintain certain minimum amounts on deposit (restricted cash) of approximately $0.8
million with the bank during the term of the credit agreement. Borrowings under the credit
facility, which cannot exceed the lesser of $15.0 million (which may be increased up to $20 million
pursuant to certain conditions set forth in the credit agreement) or 60% of the uncollected value
of purchased accounts receivable that are eligible for coverage under an insurance policy for the
receivables and bear interest equal to the bank Prime Rate (minimum of 4%) plus applicable margins
(between 1.5% to 2.25%). In addition, if the aggregate amount of interest earned by the bank in any
month is less than $20,000, Conexant CF pays an amount equal to the minimum monthly interest of
$20,000 minus the aggregate amount of all interest earned by the bank. The credit agreement matures
on December 31, 2010 and remains subject to additional 364-day renewal periods at the discretion of
the bank.
The credit facility is subject to financial covenants including a minimum level of shareholders
equity covenant, an adjusted quick ratio covenant, and a minimum cash and cash equivalents
covenant. Further, any failure by the Company or Conexant CF to pay their respective debts as they
become due would allow the bank to terminate the credit agreement and cause all borrowings under
the credit facility to immediately become due and payable. At July 2, 2010, Conexant CF had not
borrowed any amounts under this credit facility.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
Certain claims have been asserted against the Company, including claims alleging the use of the
intellectual property rights of others in certain of the Companys products. The resolution of
these matters may entail the negotiation of a license agreement, a settlement, or the adjudication
of such claims through arbitration or litigation. The outcome of litigation cannot be predicted
with certainty, and some lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably for the
Company. Many intellectual property disputes have a risk of injunctive relief and there can be no
assurance that a license will be granted. Injunctive relief could have a material adverse effect on
the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. Based on its evaluation of matters
that are pending or asserted and taking into account the Companys reserves for such matters,
management believes that the disposition of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on
the Companys financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
14
Guarantees and Indemnifications
The Company has made guarantees and indemnities, under which it may be required to make payments to
a guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions. In connection with the
Companys spin-off from Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell), the Company assumed
responsibility for all contingent liabilities and then-current and future litigation (including
environmental and intellectual property proceedings) against Rockwell or its subsidiaries in
respect of the operations of the semiconductor systems business of Rockwell. In connection with the
Companys contribution of certain of its manufacturing operations to TowerJazz, Inc. (TowerJazz),
the Company agreed to indemnify TowerJazz for certain environmental matters and other customary
divestiture-related matters. In connection with the Companys sale of the BMP business to NXP, the
Company agreed to indemnify NXP for certain claims related to the transaction. In connection with
the Companys sale of the BBA business to Ikanos, the Company agreed to indemnify Ikanos for
certain claims related to the transaction. In connection with the sales of its products, the
Company provides intellectual property indemnities to its customers. In connection with certain
facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessors for certain claims arising from the
facility or the lease. The Company indemnifies its directors and officers to the maximum extent
permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The durations of the Companys guarantees and indemnities vary, and in many cases are indefinite.
The guarantees and indemnities to customers in connection with product sales generally are subject
to limits based upon the amount of the related product sales. The majority of other guarantees and
indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company
could be obligated to make. The Company has not recorded any liability for these guarantees and
indemnities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as they are not estimated to be
material. Product warranty costs are not significant.
7. Stock-Based Award Plans
The Company has stock option plans and long-term incentive plans under which employees and
directors may be granted options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock. As of July 2,
2010, approximately 10.0 million shares of the Companys common stock are available for grant under
the stock option and long-term incentive plans. Stock options are granted with exercise prices of
not less than the fair market value at grant date, generally vest over three to four years and
expire eight or ten years after the grant date. The Company settles stock option exercises with newly issued shares of common stock. The Company
has also assumed stock option plans in connection with business combinations.
Stock Options
The Company accounts for its stock options in accordance with the accounting guidance for
share-based payments. The Company is required to measure compensation cost for all stock-based
awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognize compensation expense in its consolidated
statements of operations over the service period that the awards are expected to vest. The Company
measures the fair value of service-based awards on the date of grant.
A summary of stock option activity is as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
Outstanding, October 2, 2009 |
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
$ |
23.20 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
0.59 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,836 |
) |
|
|
25.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, July 2, 2010 |
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
|
21.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares vested and expected to vest, July 2, 2010 |
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
21.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, July 2, 2010 |
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
$ |
22.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At July 2, 2010, of the 2.3 million stock options outstanding, approximately 1.8 million options
were held by current employees and directors of the Company, and approximately 0.5 million options
were held by employees of former businesses of the Company (i.e., Mindspeed, Skyworks) who remain
employed by one of these businesses. At July 2, 2010, stock options outstanding had an immaterial
aggregate intrinsic value and a weighted-average remaining contractual term of 2.5 years. At July
2, 2010, exercisable stock options had an immaterial aggregate intrinsic value and a
weighted-average remaining contractual term of 2.4 years. No options were exercised during the
fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. At July 2, 2010, the total unrecognized fair value compensation
cost related to non-vested stock option awards was $0.2 million, which is expected to be recognized
over a remaining weighted average period of approximately one year.
During the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense of $0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for stock options,
in its consolidated statements of operations. During the fiscal quarter
15
and nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0.7 million and
$3.8 million, respectively, for stock options, in its consolidated statements of operations.
Restricted Stock Units
The Companys long-term incentive plans also provide for the issuance of share-based restricted
stock unit (RSU) awards to officers and other employees and certain non-employees of the Company.
These awards are subject to forfeiture if employment terminates during the prescribed vesting
period (generally within one to two years of the date of award). The Company maintains the 2010
Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by stockholders in February 2010 and under which the
Company has reserved 12 million shares for issuance and the 2004 New Hire Equity Incentive Plan,
under which it reserved 1.2 million shares for issuance. The 2000 Non-Qualified plan expired in the
fiscal quarter ended January 1, 2010 and the Company may not make new awards under that plan after
its expiration. All awards granted under these plans are service-based awards. Awards issued under
the 2000 Non-Qualified Plan and the 2004 New Hire Equity Incentive Plan are settled in shares of
common stock.
A summary of RSU award activity under the Companys plans is as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
Outstanding, October 2, 2009 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
$ |
2.82 |
|
Granted |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
3.54 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
2.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, July 2, 2010 |
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively, related to RSU
awards. During the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense of $0.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, related to RSU
awards. At July 2, 2010, the total unrecognized fair value stock-based compensation cost related to
RSU awards was $8.1 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.3 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In the first fiscal quarter of 2010, the Company reinstated the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) for eligible domestic employees and the 1999 Non Qualified ESPP for eligible international
employees. The first purchase period commenced February 1, 2010. The ESPP allows eligible employees
to purchase shares of the Companys common stock at six-month intervals during an offering period
at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first day of the offering period or the
purchase date. Under the ESPP, employees authorize the Company to withhold up to 15% of their
compensation for each pay period, up to a maximum annual amount of $25,000, to purchase shares
under the plan, subject to certain limitations, and employees are limited to the purchase of 600
shares per offering period. Offering periods generally commence on the first trading day of
February and August of each year and are generally six months in duration, but may be terminated
earlier under certain circumstances.
During the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, the Company recognized
stock-based compensation expense of $0.1 million for stock purchase plans in its consolidated
statements of operations. During the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009, the
Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $0 and $0.1 million, respectively, for stock
purchase plans in its consolidated statements of operations.
16
8. Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(7,453 |
) |
|
$ |
(688 |
) |
|
$ |
11,760 |
|
|
$ |
(38,793 |
) |
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
(1,230 |
) |
Change in unrealized (losses) gains on marketable securities |
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,728 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Unrealized losses on foreign currency forward hedge contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,803 |
) |
Realized loss on impairment of marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
Sale of marketable securities |
|
|
(6,566 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(6,566 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
Realized loss on interest rate swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on settlement of foreign currency forward hedge contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(7,681 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
5,336 |
|
|
|
(1,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(15,134 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,076 |
) |
|
$ |
17,096 |
|
|
$ |
(40,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
$ |
(350 |
) |
|
$ |
(796 |
) |
Unrealized gains on marketable securities |
|
$ |
3,162 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,812 |
|
|
$ |
(2,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Income Taxes
The Company recorded a tax provision of $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the fiscal quarter and
nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, respectively, primarily reflecting income taxes imposed on
our foreign subsidiaries. The Company recorded a tax provision of $0.2 million and $0.8 million for
the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009, respectively, primarily reflecting
income taxes imposed on our foreign subsidiaries. All of our U.S. federal income taxes and the
majority of our state income taxes are offset by fully reserved deferred tax assets.
10. Gain on Sale of Intellectual Property
In October 2008, the Company sold a portfolio of patents, including patents related to its prior
wireless networking technology, to a third party for cash of $14.5 million, net of costs, and
recognized a gain of $12.9 million on the transaction for the quarter ended January 2, 2009. In
accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, the Company retains a
cross-license to this portfolio of patents.
11. Special Charges
For the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010, special charges consisted of $0.5
million for restructuring expense primarily related to accretion of lease liability, and $0.2
million related to impairment of a facility lease and lease deposits. For the nine fiscal months
ended July 2, 2010, special charges consisted of $0.6 million for restructuring charges primarily
related to accretion of lease liability and $0.3 million primarily related to impairment of a
facility lease and lease deposits. For the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009, special charges
consisted primarily of $0.5 million of restructuring charges related to workforce reductions
implemented during the quarter and $0.5 million related to accretion of lease liability. For the
nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009, special charges of $13.7 million consisted primarily of
restructuring charges of $2.7 million related to workforce reductions, $6.9 million related to
revised sublease assumptions and accretion of lease liability associated with vacated facilities, a
$3.7 million charge for a legal settlement and $0.4 million of loss on disposal of property, plant
and equipment.
Restructuring Charges
The Company has implemented a number of cost reduction initiatives since fiscal 2005 to improve its
operating cost structure. The cost reduction initiatives included workforce reductions and the
closure or consolidation of certain facilities, among other actions.
As of July 2, 2010, the Company has remaining restructuring accruals of $36.5 million, of which
$0.1 million relates to workforce reductions and $36.4 million relates to facility and other costs.
Of the $36.5 million of restructuring accruals at July 2, 2010, $4.4 million is included in other
current liabilities and $32.1 million is included in other non-current liabilities in the
accompanying
17
consolidated balance sheets. The Company expects to pay the amounts accrued for the
workforce reductions through fiscal 2010 and expects to pay the obligations for the non-cancelable
lease and other commitments over their respective terms, which expire at various dates through
fiscal 2021. The Companys accrued liabilities include the net present value of the future lease
obligations of $56.8 million, net of contracted sublease income of $11.7 million, and projected
sublease income of $8.7 million, and the Company will accrete the remaining amounts into expense
over the remaining terms of the non-cancellable leases. Cash payments to complete the restructuring
actions will be funded from available cash reserves and funds from operating activities and are not
expected to significantly impact the Companys liquidity. In the nine fiscal months ended July 2,
2010, the Company accrued additional restructuring expense of $1.8 million, primarily due to
accretion of lease liability on restructured facilities. Of this amount, $1.2 million was
classified in discontinued operations and the remaining $0.6 million was recorded as special
charges as described above.
Fiscal 2009 Restructuring Actions As part of a workforce reduction implemented during fiscal
2009, the Company recorded an adjustment to severance expense of $26 thousand for the nine months
ended July 2, 2010 related to the 2009 restructuring action.
Fiscal 2008 Restructuring Actions During fiscal 2008, the Company announced its decision to
discontinue investments in standalone wireless networking solutions and other product areas.
Restructuring charges in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 related to the fiscal 2008
restructuring actions included $0.1 million of additional facility charges.
Fiscal 2007
Restructuring Actions During fiscal 2007, the Company announced several facility closures and
workforce reductions.
Restructuring charges in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 related to the fiscal 2007
restructuring actions additional facility charges of $2.2 million resulting from accretion of lease
liability on restructured facilities offset by a credit to facility charges of $1.1 million due to
re-utilization of the facility. Of these amounts, $1.2 million was classified in discontinued
operations because it related to the BMP facility.
Activity and liability balances recorded as part of the fiscal 2007 restructuring actions through
July 2, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
|
and Other |
|
Restructuring balance, October 2, 2009 |
|
$ |
27,233 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
1,069 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(4,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, July 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
23,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006 and 2005 Restructuring Actions During fiscal years 2006 and 2005, the Company
announced operating site closures and workforce reductions.
Restructuring charges in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 related to the fiscal 2006 and
2005 restructuring actions included $0.6 million of additional facility charges due to accretion of
lease liability.
Activity and liability balances recorded as part of the fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 restructuring
actions through July 2, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility |
|
|
|
and Other |
|
Restructuring balance, October 2, 2009 |
|
$ |
13,851 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
553 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(1,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring balance, July 2, 2010 |
|
$ |
12,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
18
12. Other Expense (Income), net
Other expense (income), net consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Investment and interest income |
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
|
$ |
(257 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,589 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(5,177 |
) |
|
|
(1,803 |
) |
|
|
(12,911 |
) |
|
|
(1,856 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
7,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities
and cost based investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
Decrease (increase) in the fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
(11,353 |
) |
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
$ |
9,248 |
|
|
$ |
(3,567 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,711 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense of $9.2 million, net during the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 primarily consisted
of a loss of $8.0 million on extinguishment of convertible debt, which consists of $5.8 million of
unamortized debt discount and a $2.1 million premium over par paid upon repurchase, and a $6.9
million decrease in the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed
common stock, partially offset by a $5.2 million gain on sale of equity investments and $0.4
million of investment and interest income on invested cash balances and other gains. Other income
of $5.7 million, net during the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 primarily consisted of a
$12.9 million gain on sale of equity investments and an $11.4 million increase in the fair value of
our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock, partially offset by a loss of
$18.6 million on extinguishment of debt, which consists of $13.4 million of unamortized debt
discount, $1.8 million premium over par paid upon repurchase and $3.4 million of transaction costs.
Other income of $3.6 million, net during the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 primarily consisted
of a $1.8 million gain on sale of equity investments, a $1.2 million increase in the fair value of
our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock and $0.6 million of investment
and interest income on invested cash balances and other gains. Other income of $3.5 million, net
during the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009 primarily consisted of a $1.9 million gain on sale
of equity investments, a $1.8 million increase in the fair value of the Companys warrant to
purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock, $1.6 million of investment and interest
income on invested cash balances and $1.0 million of other gains partially offset by
other-than-temporary impairments of marketable securities and cost method investments of $2.8
million.
13. Related Party Transactions
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc.
As of July 2, 2010, the Company holds a warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common
stock at an exercise price of $16.74 per share exercisable through June 2013. In addition, one
member of the Companys Board of Directors also serves on the Board of Mindspeed. No amounts were
due to or receivable from Mindspeed at July 2, 2010 or at October 2, 2009.
Lease Agreement The Companys sublease of an office building to Mindspeed expired on June 27,
2010. During the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, the
Company recorded income related to the Mindspeed sublease agreement of $0.4 million and $0.5
million, and $1.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Additionally, Mindspeed made payments
directly to the Companys landlord totaling $0.8 million and $0.9 million during the fiscal
quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively, and $2.6 million and $2.5 million
during the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. Also during the
fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 we received $0.1 million from Mindspeed for resolution of
outstanding matters related to the lease and sale of furniture and fixtures.
19
14. Geographic Information
Net revenues by geographic area, based upon country of destination, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
5,458 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
11,299 |
|
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
Other Americas |
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
3,418 |
|
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas |
|
|
6,491 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
14,717 |
|
|
|
7,073 |
|
China |
|
|
37,326 |
|
|
|
33,522 |
|
|
|
108,537 |
|
|
|
97,360 |
|
Other Asia-Pacific |
|
|
16,249 |
|
|
|
15,467 |
|
|
|
58,794 |
|
|
|
45,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asia-Pacific |
|
|
53,575 |
|
|
|
48,989 |
|
|
|
167,331 |
|
|
|
142,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60,730 |
|
|
$ |
50,844 |
|
|
$ |
184,411 |
|
|
$ |
152,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company believes that a portion of the products sold to original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs) and third-party manufacturing service providers in the Asia-Pacific region is ultimately
shipped to end-markets in the Americas and Europe. One distributor, Sertek Incorporated, accounted
for 15% and 22% of net revenues for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009,
respectively, and 14% and 20% of net revenues for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and
July 3, 2009, respectively. Sales to the Companys twenty largest customers represented
approximately 84% and 85% of net revenues for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 and July 3,
2009, respectively, and 82% and 76% of net revenues for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010
and July 3, 2009, respectively.
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment and certain other long-term assets.
Long-lived assets by geographic area were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
October 2, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
23,093 |
|
|
$ |
26,064 |
|
India |
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
China |
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
Other Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,267 |
|
|
$ |
30,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following have been excluded from the geographic presentation of long-lived assets above as of
July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, respectively: Goodwill totaling $109.9 million and $109.9
million, Intangible assets totaling $4.6 million and $5.6 million, and the Mindspeed warrant
totaling $16.4 million and $5.1 million. These items are located in the United States and disclosed
separately.
15. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events subsequent to July 2, 2010 to assess the need for potential
recognition or disclosure in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Such events were evaluated till
the date these financial statements were issued. Based upon this evaluation, it was determined that
no subsequent events occurred that require recognition in the financial statements.
20
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report, as
well as other cautionary statements and risks described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, and our
audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2009.
Overview
We design, develop and sell semiconductor system solutions, comprised of semiconductor devices,
software and reference designs, for imaging, audio, embedded-modem, and video applications. These
solutions include a comprehensive portfolio of imaging solutions for multifunction printers (MFPs),
fax platforms, and connected frame market segments. Our audio solutions include high-definition
(HD) audio integrated circuits, HD audio codecs, and speakers-on-a-chip solutions for personal
computers (PCs), PC peripheral sound systems, audio subsystems, speakers, notebook docking
stations, voice-over-IP speakerphones, intercom, door phone, and audio-enabled surveillance
applications. We also offer a full suite of embedded-modem solutions for set-top boxes,
point-of-sale systems, home automation and security systems, and desktop and notebook PCs.
Additional products include decoders and media bridges for video surveillance and security
applications, and system solutions for analog video-based multimedia applications.
We market and sell our semiconductor products and system solutions directly to leading original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of communication electronics products, and indirectly through
electronic components distributors. We also sell our products to third-party electronic
manufacturing service providers, who manufacture products incorporating our semiconductor products
for OEMs. Sales to distributors and other resellers accounted for approximately 25% and 24% of our
net revenues in the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, respectively,
compared to 36% and 30% of our net revenues in the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July
3, 2009, respectively. One distributor, Sertek Incorporated, accounted for 15% and 22% of net
revenues for the fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. The same
distributor accounted for 14% and 20% of net revenues for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010
and July 3, 2009, respectively. Our top 20 customers accounted for approximately 84% and 85% of net
revenues for the fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively, and 82% and 76%
of net revenues for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively.
Revenues derived from customers located in the Americas, the Asia-Pacific region and Europe
(including the Middle East and Africa) accounted for 11%, 88% and 1%, respectively, of our net
revenues for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 compared to 3%, 96% and 1%, respectively, of our
net revenues for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009. Revenues derived from customers located in
the Americas, the Asia-Pacific region and Europe (including the Middle East and Africa) accounted
for 8%, 91% and 1%, respectively, of our net revenues for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010
compared to 5%, 94% and 1%, respectively, of our net revenues for the nine fiscal months ended July
3, 2009. We believe a portion of the products we sell to OEMs and third-party manufacturing service
providers in the Asia-Pacific region is ultimately shipped to end-markets in the Americas and
Europe.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP), which require us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements, revenues and expenses during the periods reported, and related
disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Information with respect to our
critical accounting policies that we believe have the most significant effect on our reported
results and require subjective or complex judgments of management is contained on pages 41-46 of
the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2009. Management believes that at
July 2, 2010, other than the addition of a policy related to marketable securities, there has been
no material change to this information.
Sale of Property
In November 2009, we committed to a plan for the sale of certain of our property located on
Jamboree Road adjacent to our Newport Beach, California headquarters. The property consists of an
approximately 25-acre site, including two leased buildings, certain personal property on the site,
and all easements and other intangible rights appurtenant to the property. We determined that this
property met the criteria for held for sale in accordance with the accounting guidance for
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and have presented the respective group of assets
separately on the face of the consolidated balance sheet as of July 2, 2010. We expect that the
sale of these assets will be completed within approximately a one-year time period from the
respective period that they met the held for sale criteria.
21
Sale of Broadband Access Products Business
On August 24, 2009, we completed the sale of our Broadband Access (BBA) business to Ikanos
Communications, Inc. (Ikanos). The results of the BBA business have been reported as discontinued
operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Sale of Broadband Media Processing Business
On August 8, 2008, we completed the sale of our Broadband Media Processing (BMP) business to NXP
B.V. (NXP). The results of the BMP business have been reported as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.
Recent Financing Activities
In October 2009, we raised additional net proceeds of approximately $2.6 million from the exercise
of the over-allotment option in connection with our September 2009 common stock offering.
In December 2009, we repurchased all outstanding floating rate senior secured notes due November
2010, amounting to $61.4 million, at a price of 101% of par. We also entered into exchange
agreements with certain holders of our outstanding 4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March
2026 to issue an aggregate of 7.1 million shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, in
exchange for $17.6 million aggregate principal amount of the notes.
In March 2010, we raised net proceeds of approximately $59.9 million in a common stock offering and
sold $175.0 million of 11.25% senior secured notes due 2015 at a price of 99.06% raising proceeds
of $168.4 million, net of expenses of $4.9 million. We also repurchased by means of a tender offer
approximately $104.7 million of our 4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026.
In May 2010, we repurchased by means of negotiated transactions approximately $116.5 million of our
4.00% convertible subordinated notes due March 2026.
At July 2, 2010, we had a total of $11.2 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% convertible
subordinated notes outstanding. These notes are due in March 2026, but the holders may require us
to repurchase, for cash, all or part of their notes on March 1, 2011, March 1, 2016 and March 1,
2021 at a price of 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
We believe that our existing sources of liquidity, together with cash expected to be generated from
operations, will be sufficient to fund our operations, research and development, anticipated
capital expenditures and working capital for at least the next twelve months.
Results of Operations
Net Revenues
We recognize revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has
occurred, (iii) the sales price and terms are fixed and determinable, and (iv) the collection of
the receivable is reasonably assured. These terms are typically met upon shipment of product to the
customer. The majority of our distributors have limited stock rotation rights, which allow them to
rotate up to 10% of product in their inventory two times per year. We recognize revenue to these
distributors upon shipment of product to the distributor, as the stock rotation rights are limited
and we believe that we have the ability to reasonably estimate and establish allowances for
expected product returns in accordance with the accounting guidance for revenue recognition.
Development revenue is recognized when services are performed and was not significant for any
periods presented.
Our net revenues increased 19% to $60.7 million for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 from
$50.8 million for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009. The increase in net revenues was driven by
a 13% increase in unit volume shipments and a 6% increase in average selling prices (ASPs). The
volume increase between the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 and the fiscal quarter ended July 3,
2009 was driven by the shipment growth of our imaging, audio, and video solutions, partially offset
by declines in our legacy businesses, including our computer modems and modems for digital
television platforms in Japan. The increase in ASPs was attributable to a change in product mix,
partially offset by pricing erosion in certain businesses.
Our net revenues increased 21% to $184.4 million for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 from
$152.3 million for the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. The increase in net revenues was
driven by a 30% increase in imaging, audio, and video unit volume shipments, offset by an 8%
decrease in ASPs attributable to pricing erosion in certain businesses.
We remain focused on capturing market share for our existing products and delivering new solutions
for imaging, audio, embedded modem, and video surveillance applications. We also plan to apply our
core capabilities in analog and mixed-signal design and firmware and software development to
capitalize on new opportunities in adjacent markets. While we remain enthusiastic about our
22
current
products and markets, we expect that declines in our legacy businesses, which include wireless
networking solutions, computer modems, and modems for digital television platforms in Japan, will
make it difficult to deliver overall revenue growth for the next several quarters.
Gross Margin
Gross margin represents net revenues less cost of goods sold. As a fabless semiconductor company,
we use third parties for wafer production and assembly and test services. Our cost of goods sold
consists predominantly of purchased finished wafers, assembly and test services, royalties, other
intellectual property costs, labor and overhead associated with product procurement and non-cash
stock-based compensation charges for procurement personnel.
Our gross margin percentage for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 was 61% compared with 60% for
the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009. The one point gross margin percentage increase is
attributable to lower product costs in the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010.
Our gross margin percentage for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was 61% compared with 58%
for the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. The three point gross margin percentage increase is
attributable to a favorable product mix, lower product costs and lower excess inventory provisions
for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010.
Research and Development
Our research and development (R&D) expenses consist principally of direct personnel costs to
develop new semiconductor products, allocated indirect costs of the R&D function, photo mask and
other costs for pre-production evaluation and testing of new devices, and design and test tool
costs. Our R&D expenses also include the costs for design automation advanced package development
and non-cash stock-based compensation charges for R&D personnel.
R&D expense increased $2.1 million, or 17%, in the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 compared to
the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009. The increase is due to higher compensation and higher
project expenses.
R&D expense increased $3.1 million, or 8%, in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 compared to
the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. The increase is due to higher compensation expenses.
Selling, General and Administrative
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include personnel costs, sales
representative commissions, advertising and other marketing costs. Our SG&A expenses also include
costs of corporate functions including legal, accounting, treasury, human resources, customer
service, sales, marketing, field application engineering, allocated indirect costs of the SG&A
function, and non-cash stock-based compensation charges for SG&A personnel.
SG&A expense decreased $3.2 million, or 21%, for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 compared to
the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009. The decrease is primarily due to a 20% decline in SG&A
headcount during the corresponding quarterly periods resulting from restructuring measures and
other cost-cutting efforts.
SG&A expense decreased $13.0 million, or 26%, in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 compared
to the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. The decrease is primarily due to a 25% decline in
SG&A headcount during the corresponding nine fiscal months resulting from restructuring measures
and other cost cutting efforts.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization of intangible assets consists of amortization expense for intangible assets acquired
in various business combinations. Our intangible assets are being amortized over a weighted-average
remaining period of approximately 4.7 years.
Amortization expense decreased by $0.4 million, or 59%, in the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010
compared to the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009. The decrease in amortization expense is
primarily attributable to the intangible assets that became fully amortized in fiscal 2009.
Amortization expense decreased $1.6 million, or 62%, in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010
compared to the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. The decrease in amortization expense is
primarily attributable to the intangible assets that became fully amortized in fiscal 2009.
23
Gain on Sale of Intellectual Property
In October 2008, we sold a portfolio of patents including patents related to our prior wireless
networking technology to a third party for cash of $14.5 million, net of costs, and recognized a
gain of $12.9 million on the transaction during the fiscal quarter ended January 2, 2009. In
accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, we retain a cross-license to this
portfolio of patents.
Special Charges
For the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, special charges of $0.7 million
and $0.9 million, respectively, consisted primarily of restructuring charges related to accretion
of lease liability and impairment of a facility lease and lease deposits.
For the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009, special charges consisted primarily of $0.5 million of
restructuring charges related to workforce reductions implemented during this period and $0.5
million related to accretion of lease liability. For the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009,
special charges of $13.7 million consisted primarily of restructuring charges of $2.7 million
related to workforce reductions, $6.9 million related to revised sublease assumptions and accretion
of lease liability associated with vacated facilities, a $3.7 million charge for a legal settlement
and $0.4 million of loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $1.3 million, or 15%, in the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 compared
to the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributable to lower debt
balances due to the extinguishment of $116.5 million of our 4.00% convertible subordinated notes
partially offset by a higher interest rate charged on our 11.25% senior secured notes. Interest
expense in the fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 includes debt discount
amortization of $0.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
Interest expense decreased $1.3 million, or 5%, in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010
compared to the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributable to
lower debt balances due to the extinguishment of $238.8 million of our 4.00% convertible
subordinated notes partially offset by a higher interest rate charged on our 11.25% senior secured
notes. Interest expense in the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009 includes debt
discount amortization of $7.0 million and $10.1 million, respectively.
Other expense (income), net
Other expense (income), net consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Investment and interest income |
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
|
$ |
(257 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,589 |
) |
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(5,177 |
) |
|
|
(1,803 |
) |
|
|
(12,911 |
) |
|
|
(1,856 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
7,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities
and cost based investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,770 |
|
Decrease (increase) in the fair value of derivative instruments |
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
(11,353 |
) |
|
|
(1,762 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
$ |
9,248 |
|
|
$ |
(3,567 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,711 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense of $9.2 million, net during the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010 primarily consisted
of a loss of $8.0 million on extinguishment of convertible debt, which consisted of $5.9 million of
unamortized debt discount, and a $2.1 million premium over par paid upon repurchase, and a $6.8
million decrease in the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed
common stock, partially offset by a $5.2 million gain on sale of equity investments and $0.4
million of investment and interest income on invested cash balances and other gains. Other income
of $5.7 million, net during the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 primarily consisted of a
$12.9 million gain on sale of equity investments and an $11.4 million increase in the fair value of
our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock, partially offset by a loss of
$18.6 million on extinguishment of debt, which consisted of $13.4 million of unamortized debt
discount, $1.8 million premium over par paid upon repurchase and $3.4 million of transaction costs.
24
Other income of $3.6 million, net during the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2009 primarily consisted
of a $1.8 million gain on sale of equity investments, a $1.2 million increase in the fair value of
our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock and $0.6 million of investment
and interest income on invested cash balances and other gains. Other income of $3.5 million, net
during the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009 primarily consisted of a $1.9 million gain on sale
of equity investments, a $1.8 million increase in the fair value of our warrant to purchase 6.1
million shares of Mindspeed common stock, $1.6 million of investment and interest income on
invested cash balances and $1.0 million of other gains, partially offset by other-than-temporary
impairments of marketable securities and cost method investments of $2.8 million.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded a tax provision of $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal
months ended July 2, 2010, primarily reflecting income taxes imposed on our foreign subsidiaries.
We recorded a tax provision of $0.2 million and $0.8 million for the fiscal quarter and nine fiscal
months ended July 3, 2009, primarily reflecting income taxes imposed on our foreign subsidiaries.
All of our U.S. federal income taxes and the majority of our state income taxes are offset by fully
reserved deferred tax assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents, sales of non-core assets,
borrowings and operating cash flow. In addition, we have generated additional liquidity in the past
through the sale of equity securities and may from time to time do so in the future.
Our cash and cash equivalents decreased $79.6 million from $125.4 million at October 2, 2009 to
$45.8 million at July 2, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the repurchase of our long-term
and short-term debt, partially offset by the common stock offering and issuance of senior secured notes,
cash generated by operations and restricted cash released upon repayment of our short-term debt,
partially offset by the net purchase of marketable securities.
Cash flows are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Fiscal Months Ended |
|
|
|
July 2, |
|
|
July 3, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
6,280 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
27,481 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(86,947 |
) |
|
|
(10,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(79,587 |
) |
|
|
17,511 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period |
|
|
125,385 |
|
|
|
105,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the ending of period |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
123,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $6.3 million for the nine fiscal months ended July
2, 2010 compared to $0.7 million for the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. Cash provided by
operating activities for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was
primarily driven by $11.8 million in net income, net non-cash operating expenses of $12.4
million, partially offset by net cash used by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $17.9
million. Cash provided by operating activities for the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009 was
primarily driven by net non-cash operating expenses of $19.3 million, net cash provided by changes
in operating assets and liabilities of $20.2 million, partially offset by a net loss of $38.8
million.
Investing Activities
Cash provided by investing activities was $1.1 million for the nine fiscal months ended July
2, 2010 compared to $27.5 million for the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. Cash provided by
investing activities for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 was primarily due to the release
of restricted cash of $8.5 million associated with our repayment of short-term debt, partially
offset by our net purchase of marketable securities of $6.7 million and capital expenditures of
$0.8 million. Cash provided by investing activities for the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009
was primarily due to the net proceeds of $14.5 million related to our prior wireless networking
technology and $12.6 million of restricted cash released associated with standby letters of credit,
partially offset by payments for acquisitions of $3.6 million.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $86.9 million for the nine fiscal months ended July 2,
2010 compared to $10.7 million for the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009. Cash used in
financing activities for the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010, was
25
primarily due to the
repurchase of our remaining senior secured notes for $62.0 million, extinguishment of our
convertible subordinated notes for $226.7 million and repayment of $29.1 million of our short-term
debt, partially offset by the common stock offering and issuance of senior secured notes, net of
expenses, of $62.5 million and $168.4 million, respectively. Cash used in investing activities for
the nine fiscal months ended July 3, 2009 was primarily due to net repayments of short-term debt.
During the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010, we repurchased by means of negotiated transactions
approximately $116.5 million of our 4.00% convertible subordinated notes. At July 2, 2010, we had a
total of $11.2 million aggregate principal amount of 4.00% convertible subordinated notes
outstanding. As further described below, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Conexant CF, LLC, has a $15.0
million credit facility with a bank. We are required to maintain certain minimum amounts on deposit
(restricted cash) of approximately $0.8 million with the bank during the term of the credit
agreement. As of July 2, 2010, no amounts had been borrowed under this facility.
At July 2, 2010, we also had a total of $175.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured
notes due 2015 outstanding. The senior notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and may not be sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable
exemption from registration requirements. The senior notes accrue interest at a rate of 11.25% per
annum payable semiannually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15,
2010. The senior notes mature on March 15, 2015. The obligations under the senior notes are fully
and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior secured basis, by all of our
existing domestic subsidiaries (except for Conexant CF, LLC) and by all of our future domestic
subsidiaries (except for immaterial subsidiaries and receivables financing subsidiaries). Conexant
CF, LLC is our receivables financing subsidiary. In addition, the senior notes and the note
guarantees are secured by liens on substantially all of our and the guarantors tangible and
intangible property, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens. On or after March 15, 2013,
we may redeem all or a part of the senior notes at a price of 105.625% of the principal amount of
the senior notes during the remainder of 2013 and 100.00% of the principal amount of the senior
notes thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. In
addition, at any time prior to March 15, 2013, we may, on one or more occasions, redeem all or a
part of the senior notes at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of
the senior notes redeemed, plus a make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the applicable redemption date. On or after January 1, 2011 until March 15, 2013, we may also
redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the senior notes, using the proceeds
of certain qualified equity offerings, at a redemption price of 111.25% of the principal amount
thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date. If a change
of control occurs, we must offer to repurchase the senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 101%
of the principal amount of the senior notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the applicable repurchase date. In addition, certain asset dispositions will be triggering
events that may require us to use the proceeds from those sales to make an offer to repurchase the
senior notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes
repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable repurchase date if such
proceeds are not otherwise invested in our business within a specific period of time. The senior
notes and the note guarantees rank senior to all of our and the guarantors existing and future
subordinated indebtedness, including the 4.00% convertible subordinated notes, but they are
structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities (including
non-trade payables) of our non-guarantor subsidiaries. We believe that our existing sources of
liquidity, together with cash expected to be generated from operations, will be sufficient to fund
our operations, research and development, anticipated capital expenditures and working capital for
at least the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations
Other than our recent debt transactions discussed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial
statements in Item 1, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations from those
previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year
ended October 2, 2009. For a summary of the contractual commitments at October 2, 2009, see Part
II, Item 7, page 37 in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have made guarantees and indemnities, under which we may be required to make payments to a
guaranteed or indemnified party, in relation to certain transactions. In connection with our
spin-off from Rockwell, we assumed responsibility for all contingent liabilities and then-current
and future litigation (including environmental and intellectual property proceedings) against
Rockwell or its subsidiaries in respect of the operations of the semiconductor systems business of
Rockwell. In connection with our contribution of certain of our manufacturing operations to
TowerJazz, we agreed to indemnify TowerJazz for certain environmental matters and other customary
divestiture-related matters. In connection with our sale of the BMP business to NXP, we agreed to
indemnify NXP for certain claims related to the transaction. In connection with the sales of our
products, we provide intellectual property indemnities to our customers. In connection with certain
facility leases, we have indemnified our lessors for certain claims arising from the facility or
the lease. We indemnify our directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws
of the State of Delaware.
The durations of our guarantees and indemnities vary, and in many cases are indefinite. The
guarantees and indemnities to customers in connection with product sales generally are subject to
limits based upon the amount of the related product sales. The majority of
26
other guarantees and
indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments we could be
obligated to make. We have not recorded any liability for these guarantees and indemnities in our
consolidated balance sheets. Product warranty costs are not significant.
We have other outstanding letters of credit collateralized by restricted cash aggregating $5.9
million to secure various long-term operating leases and our self-insured workers compensation
plan. The restricted cash associated with these letters of credit is classified as other long-term
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Special Purpose Entity
We have one special purpose entity, Conexant CF, LLC (Conexant CF) which is our wholly-owned,
consolidated subsidiary. Conexant CF is not permitted, nor may its assets be used, to guarantee or
satisfy any of our obligations or those of our subsidiaries.
On November 29, 2005, we established an lunts receivable financing facility whereby we sold,
from time to time, certain accounts receivable to Conexant USA. Under the terms of our agreements
with Conexant USA, we retained the responsibility to service and collect accounts receivable sold
to Conexant USA and received a weekly fee from Conexant USA for handling administrative matters
that equaled 1.0%, on a per annum basis, of the uncollected value of the accounts receivable. Our
$50.0 million credit facility secured by the assets of Conexant USA expired on November 27, 2009.
As permitted by the credit facility, all amounts owed on the credit facility were repaid as of
January 1, 2010. Conexant USA was merged into Conexant CF in the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010.
On December 22, 2009, we established a new accounts receivable financing facility whereby we sell,
from time to time, certain accounts receivable to Conexant CF. Under the terms of our agreements
with Conexant CF, we retain the responsibility to service and collect accounts receivable sold to
Conexant CF and receive a weekly fee from Conexant CF for handling administrative matters that is
equal to 1.0%, on a per annum basis, of the uncollected value of the purchased accounts receivable.
Concurrently with entering into the new accounts receivable financing facility, Conexant CF entered
into a new credit facility to finance the cash portion of the purchase price of eligible
receivables. The new credit facility is secured by the assets of Conexant CF. Conexant CF is
required to maintain certain minimum amounts on deposit (restricted cash) of approximately $0.8
million with the bank during the term of the credit agreement. Borrowings under the credit
facility, which cannot exceed the lesser of $15.0 million or 60% of the uncollected value of
purchased accounts receivable that are eligible for coverage under an insurance policy for the
receivables, bear interest equal to the bank Prime Rate (minimum of 3.25%) plus applicable margins
(between 1.5% to 2.25%). In addition, if the aggregate amount of interest earned by the bank in any
month is less than $20,000, Conexant CF pays an amount equal to the minimum monthly interest of
$20,000 minus the aggregate amount of all interest earned by the bank. The credit agreement matures
on December 31, 2010 and remains subject to additional 364-day renewal periods at the discretion of
the bank.
The credit facility is subject to financial covenants including a minimum level of shareholders
equity covenant, an adjusted quick ratio covenant, and a minimum cash and cash equivalents
covenant. Further, any failure by us or Conexant CF to pay their respective debts as they become
due would allow the bank to terminate the credit agreement and cause all borrowings under the
credit facility to immediately become due and payable. At July 2, 2010, Conexant CF had not
borrowed any amounts under this credit facility and was in compliance with all covenants under the
credit facility.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 3Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial
statements in Part I, Item 1 for information related to recently issued and adopted accounting
pronouncements.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, equity securities, our warrant to
purchase Mindspeed common stock, restricted cash and long-term debt. Our main investment objectives
are the preservation of investment capital and the maximization of after tax returns on our
investment portfolio. Consequently, we invest with only high credit quality issuers, and we limit
the amount of our credit exposure to any one issuer.
Our cash and cash equivalents are not subject to significant interest rate risk due to the short
maturities of these instruments. As of July 2, 2010, the carrying value of our cash and cash
equivalents approximated fair value.
Other equity securities include marketable securities with a market value listed from a stock
exchange as of July 2, 2010. We hold a warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common
stock at an exercise price of $16.74 per share through June 2013. For financial accounting
purposes, this is a derivative instrument and the fair value of the warrant is subject to
significant risk related to changes in the market price of Mindspeed common stock. As of July 2,
2010, a 10% decrease in the market price of Mindspeed common stock would result in a decrease of
$2.3 million in the fair value of this warrant. At July 2, 2010, the market price of Mindspeed
common stock was $6.67 per share. During the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010, the market price of
Mindspeed common stock ranged from a low of $6.67 per share to a high of $10.71 per share.
27
Our short-term debt consists of 4.00% convertible subordinated notes with interest at fixed rates.
The fair value of our 4.00% convertible subordinated notes is subject to significant fluctuation
due to their convertibility into shares of our common stock.
The following table shows the fair values of our financial instruments as of July 2, 2010 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Fair Value |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
|
$ |
45,798 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
23,345 |
|
|
|
23,345 |
|
Mindspeed warrant |
|
|
16,407 |
|
|
|
16,407 |
|
Long-term restricted cash |
|
|
5,899 |
|
|
|
5,899 |
|
Short-term debt: convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
11,218 |
|
|
|
11,190 |
|
Long-term debt: senior secured notes |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
175,875 |
|
Exchange Rate Risk
We consider our direct exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations to be minimal. Currently,
sales to customers and arrangements with third-party manufacturers provide for pricing and payment
in United States dollars and, therefore, are not subject to exchange rate fluctuations. Increases
in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies could make our products more
expensive, which could negatively impact our ability to compete. Conversely, decreases in the value
of the United States dollar relative to other currencies could result in our suppliers raising
their prices to continue doing business with us. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could
affect our business in the future. At July 2, 2010, we did not have any foreign currency forward
exchange contracts outstanding.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that, as
of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter
ended July 2, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
None
Our business, financial condition and results of operations can be impacted by a number of risk
factors, any one of which could cause our actual results to vary materially from recent results or
from our anticipated future results. Any of these risks could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations, which in turn could materially and
adversely affect the price of our common stock or other securities.
We have updated the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended October 2, 2009, as set forth below. We have added risk factors regarding decreasing
average selling prices of legacy products, limited visibility into customer sales volume and
inventory levels, lengthy sales cycles and loss of sales due to order cancelations and R&D
expenditures not yielding products with enough sales volume to deliver growth. In addition, we
have made material changes in the order of importance in which the risk factors are listed below.
References in this section to our fiscal year refer to the fiscal year ending on the Friday nearest
September 30 of each year.
We are a much smaller company than in the recent past and dependent on fewer products for our
success.
We are a much smaller company than in the recent past with a narrower, less diversified
and more focused portfolio of products. Our smaller size could cause our cash flow and growth
prospects to be more volatile and make us more vulnerable to focused competition. As a smaller
company, we will have less capital available for research and development and for strategic
investments and acquisitions. As a smaller company, we will be subject to greater revenue
fluctuations if our older product lines sales were to decline faster than we anticipate. We could
also face greater challenges in satisfying or refinancing our debt obligations as they become due.
In addition, we may not be able to appropriately restructure our supporting functions to fit the
needs of a smaller company.
28
Our success depends on our ability to timely develop competitive new products to offset
declines in our legacy products, increase market share, and reduce costs.
Our operating results depend largely on our ability to introduce new and enhanced semiconductor
products on a timely basis to enable us to grow and to replace decreasing revenue from our
established legacy products, which include wireless networking solutions, computer modems and
modems for digital television platforms in Japan. Successful product development and introduction
depends on numerous factors, including, among others, our ability to:
|
|
|
anticipate customer and market requirements and changes in technology and industry
standards; |
|
|
|
|
accurately define new products; |
|
|
|
|
complete development of new products and bring our products to market on a timely basis; |
|
|
|
|
differentiate our products from offerings of our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
achieve overall market acceptance of our products; and |
|
|
|
|
coordinate product development efforts between and among our sites, particularly in
India and China, to manage the development of products at remote geographic locations. |
We may not have sufficient resources to make the substantial investment in research and development
in order to develop and bring to market new and enhanced products. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to develop and introduce new or enhanced products in a timely and cost-effective
manner, that our products will satisfy customer requirements or achieve market acceptance, or that
we will be able to anticipate new industry standards and technological changes. The complexity of
our products may lead to errors, defects and bugs which could subject us to significant costs or
damages and adversely affect market acceptance of our products. We also cannot assure you that we
will be able to respond successfully to new product announcements and introductions by competitors.
The average selling prices of our established legacy products in our markets have historically
decreased rapidly and will likely do so in the future, which could harm our revenue and gross
profits.
Many of our products face significant competition and are subject to rapid declines in average
selling prices over the life of the products. We have historically decreased the average selling
prices of many of our products in order to meet market demand, and we expect that we will continue
to reduce prices in the future. Reductions in our average selling prices to one customer could
impact our average selling prices to all customers. A decline in average selling prices could harm
our gross margins. Historically, we have generally been able to substantially offset reductions in
our average selling prices with decreases in our product costs and increases in our unit volumes.
Our financial results will suffer if we are unable to offset any future reductions in our average
selling prices by increasing our unit volumes, reducing our costs or developing new or enhanced
products on a timely basis with higher selling prices or gross profit. While gross profit may
decline as a result of reductions in average selling prices, we may continue to incur research and
development costs at higher or existing levels to develop future products. This continued spending
would have an adverse impact on our immediate operating results if our revenue does not continue to
grow or our gross margins decline.
We are subject to intense competition.
The communications semiconductor industry in general, and the markets in which we compete in
particular, are intensely competitive. We compete worldwide with a number of U.S. and international
semiconductor providers that are both larger and smaller than us in terms of resources and market
share. We continually face significant competition in our markets. This competition results in
declining average selling prices for our products. We also anticipate that additional competitors
will enter our markets as a result of expected growth opportunities, technological and public
policy changes and relatively low barriers to entry in certain markets of the industry. Many of our
competitors have certain advantages over us, such as significantly greater sales and marketing,
manufacturing, distribution, technical, financial and other resources. In addition, many of our
current and potential competitors have a stronger
29
financial position, less indebtedness and greater financial resources than we do. These competitors
may be able to devote greater financial resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products than we can.
We believe that the principal competitive factors for semiconductor suppliers in our addressed
markets are:
|
|
|
time-to-market; |
|
|
|
|
product quality, reliability and performance; |
|
|
|
|
level of integration; |
|
|
|
|
price and total system cost; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with industry standards; |
|
|
|
|
design and engineering capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
strategic relationships with customers; |
|
|
|
|
customer support; |
|
|
|
|
new product innovation; and |
|
|
|
|
access to manufacturing capacity. |
In addition, the financial stability of suppliers is an important consideration in our customers
purchasing decisions. Our relationship with existing and potential customers could be adversely
affected if our customers perceive that we lack an appropriate level of financial liquidity or
stability or if they think we are too small to do business with.
Current and potential competitors also have established or may establish financial or strategic
relationships among themselves or with our existing or potential customers, resellers or other
third parties. These relationships may affect customers purchasing decisions. Accordingly, it is
possible that new competitors or alliances could emerge and rapidly acquire significant market
share. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current and
potential competitors.
We operate in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry, which is subject to significant downturns
that may negatively impact our business, financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and is characterized by constant and rapid
technological change, rapid product obsolescence and price erosion, evolving technical standards,
short product life cycles (for semiconductors and for the end-user products in which they are used)
and wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. Recent domestic and global economic conditions
have presented unprecedented and challenging conditions reflecting continued concerns about the
availability and cost of credit, the U.S. mortgage market, declining real estate values, increased
energy costs, decreased consumer confidence and spending and added concerns fueled by the U.S.
federal governments interventions in the U.S. financial and credit markets. These conditions have
contributed to instability in both U.S. and international capital and credit markets and diminished
expectations for the U.S. and global economy. In addition, these conditions make it extremely
difficult for our customers to accurately forecast and plan future business activities and could
cause U.S. and foreign businesses to slow spending on our products, which could cause our sales to
decrease or result in an extension of our sales cycles. Further, given uncertainty in the economic
environment, our customers may have difficulties obtaining capital at adequate or historical levels
to finance their ongoing business and operations, which could impair their ability to make timely
payments to us. If that were to occur, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful
accounts and our days sales outstanding would be negatively impacted. We cannot predict the timing,
strength or duration of any economic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery, worldwide or within
our industry. If the economy or markets in which we operate continue to be subject to these adverse
economic conditions, our business, financial condition, cash flow and results of operations will be
adversely affected.
30
Since we have limited visibility as to the volume of sales of our products by our customers and
inventory levels of our products held by our customers, our ability to forecast accurately future
demand for and sales of our products is limited.
We sell our chipsets to OEMs who integrate our chipsets into their products or to ODMs who include
our chipsets in the products they supply to OEMs. We have limited visibility as to the volume of
our products that our OEM and ODM customers are selling to their customers or carrying in their
inventory. If our customers have excess inventory or experience a slowing of products sold through
to their end customers, it would likely result in a slowdown in orders from our customers and
adversely impact our future sales and inventory.
Our products typically have lengthy sales cycles. A customer may decide to cancel or change its
product plans, which could cause us to lose anticipated sales and we may incur significant expenses
before we generate any revenues
After we have developed and delivered a product to a customer, the customer will usually evaluate
our product prior to designing its own equipment to incorporate our product. Our customers may need
several months to test, evaluate and choose whether to adopt our product, and to begin volume
production of equipment that incorporates our product. Due to these lengthy sales cycles, we may
experience significant delays from the time we incur certain research and development costs,
selling, general and administrative expenses, and build initial inventory, until the time we
generate revenue from these products. It is possible that we may never generate any revenue from
these products after incurring such expenditures. Even if a customer selects our solution to
incorporate into its product, we have no assurances that the customer will ultimately market and
sell its product or that such efforts by our customer will be successful. The delays inherent in
our lengthy sales cycle also increase the risk that a customer will decide to cancel or curtail,
reduce or delay its product plans. Such a cancellation or change in plans by a customer could cause
us to lose sales that we had anticipated.
We will continue to expend substantial resources developing products for new applications or
markets and may never achieve the sales volume that we anticipate for these products, which may
limit our future growth and harm our results of operations.
We have focused our R&D investments in Imaging, Audio and Video areas. Through the acquisition of
the Sigmatel MFP business in 2008, and the purchase of assets and certain liabilities of the ADI
audio business in 2009 and our internal development efforts, we have increased our sales in these
application areas. Although we plan to continue to drive growth in these applications and other
new areas, we still have significant portion of revenue coming from our legacy modem businesses.
Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to offer products outside of this legacy
business, and we face a number of risks in connection with these products, including those
described in other risk factors in this report. We have in the past, and will likely in the future,
expend substantial resources in developing new and additional products for new applications and
markets. We may experience unforeseen difficulties and delays in developing these products and
defects upon volume production and broad deployment. In addition, we will have limited experience
in these new markets, and we may be unsuccessful in marketing and selling any products we develop
for these or other new markets. The markets we choose to enter will likely be highly competitive
and many of our competitors will have substantially more experience in these markets. Our success
will depend on the growth of the markets we enter, the competitiveness of our products and our
ability to increase our market share in these markets. If we choose to enter markets that do not
achieve or sustain the growth we anticipate, or if our products are not competitive, we may not
achieve volume sales, which may limit our future growth and would harm our results of operations.
The loss of a key customer could seriously impact our revenue levels and harm our business. In
addition, if we are unable to continue to sell existing and new products to our key customers in
significant quantities or to attract new significant customers, our future operating results could
be adversely affected. In addition, if a second source supplier becomes available to a key
customer for whom we are the sole supplier, our revenue from that key customer could be adversely
affected.
We have derived a substantial portion of our past revenue from sales to a relatively small number
of customers. As a result, the loss of any significant customer could materially and adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Sales to our 20 largest customers, including distributors, represented approximately 84% and 85% of
our net revenues in the fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively, and
approximately 82% and 76% of our net revenues in the nine fiscal
31
months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. Sales to our 20 largest customers,
including distributors, represented approximately 87%, 83% and 82% of our net revenues in the
fiscal years ended October 2, 2009, October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively. For the
fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, one distributor accounted for 15% and 22%,
respectively, of our net revenues. For the nine fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009,
one distributor accounted for 14% and 20%, respectively, of our net revenues. For each of the
fiscal years ended October 2, 2009, October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, one distributor
accounted for 23% of our net revenues. We expect that our largest customers will continue to
account for a substantial portion of our net revenue in future periods. The identities of our
largest customers and their respective contributions to our net revenue have varied and will likely
continue to vary from period to period. We may not be able to maintain or increase sales to certain
of our key customers for a variety of reasons, including the following:
|
|
|
most of our customers can stop incorporating our products into their own products
with limited notice to us and suffer little or no penalty; |
|
|
|
|
our agreements with our customers typically do not require them to purchase a minimum
quantity of our products; |
|
|
|
|
our customers perceptions of our liquidity and viability may have a negative impact
on their decisions to incorporate our products into their own products; |
|
|
|
|
many of our customers have pre-existing or concurrent relationships with our current
or potential competitors that may affect the customers decisions to purchase our
products; |
|
|
|
|
our customers face intense competition from other manufacturers that do not use our
products; |
|
|
|
|
some of our customers offer or may offer products that compete with our products; |
|
|
|
|
some of our customers liquidity may be negatively affected by continued uncertainty
in global economic conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
our small size, our cost-savings efforts and any future liquidity constraints may
limit our ability to develop and deliver new products to customers. |
In addition, our longstanding relationships with some larger customers may also deter other
potential customers who compete with these customers from buying our products. To attract new
customers or retain existing customers, we may offer certain customers favorable prices on our
products. The loss of a key customer, a reduction in sales to any key customer or our inability to
attract new significant customers could seriously impact our revenue and materially and adversely
affect our results of operations.
Further, our product portfolio consists predominantly of semiconductor solutions for the
communications, PC, and consumer markets. Recently, unfavorable domestic and global economic
conditions have had an adverse impact on demand in these end-user markets by reducing overall
consumer spending or shifting consumer spending to products other than those made by our customers.
Any prolonged or significant decrease in consumer spending by customers in these end-markets will
adversely impact demand by our customers for our products and could also slow new product
introductions by our customers and by us. Lower net sales of our products would have an adverse
effect on our revenue, cash flow and results of operations.
We may not be able to keep abreast of the rapid technological changes in our markets.
The demand for our products can change quickly and in ways we may not anticipate because the
markets we operate in generally exhibit the following characteristics:
|
|
|
rapid technological developments; |
|
|
|
|
rapid changes in customer requirements; |
|
|
|
|
frequent new product introductions and enhancements; |
|
|
|
|
short product life cycles with declining prices over the life cycle of the products; |
32
|
|
|
evolving industry standards; and |
|
|
|
|
constant transitioning to smaller geometry process technologies or in achieving
higher levels of design integration, which may result in reduced manufacturing yields,
delays in product deliveries, increased expenses and loss of design wins to our
competitors. |
Our products could become obsolete sooner than anticipated because of a faster than anticipated
change in one or more of the technologies related to our products or in market demand for products
based on a particular technology, particularly due to the introduction of new technology that
represents a substantial advance over current technology. Currently accepted industry standards are
also subject to change, which may contribute to the obsolescence of our products.
If OEMs of electronics products do not design our products into their equipment, we will be unable
to sell those products. Moreover, a design win from a customer does not guarantee future sales to
that customer.
Our products are components of other products. As a result, we rely on OEMs of electronics products
to select our products from among alternative offerings to be designed into their equipment. We may
be unable to achieve these design wins. Without design wins from OEMs, we would be unable to sell
our products. Once an OEM designs another suppliers semiconductors into one of its product
platforms, it will be more difficult for us to achieve future design wins with that OEMs product
platform because changing suppliers involves significant cost, time, effort and risk. Achieving a
design win with a customer does not ensure that we will receive significant revenues from that
customer and we may be unable to convert design wins into actual sales. Even after a design win,
the customer is not obligated to purchase our products and can choose at any time to stop using our
products if, for example, it or its own products are not commercially successful.
Our operating and financial flexibility is limited by the terms of the agreement governing our
accounts receivable financing facility and the terms of the indenture governing our senior secured
notes due in 2015.
The agreement governing our accounts receivable financing facility and the indenture governing our
senior secured notes due in 2015 contain financial and other covenants that may limit our ability
to take, or prevent us from taking certain actions that we believe are in the best interests of our
business and our stockholders. For example, the indenture governing our senior secured notes
contains covenants that restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability and the ability of our
subsidiaries who are guarantors of our senior secured notes to incur or guarantee additional
indebtedness or issue certain redeemable or preferred stock; repurchase capital stock; pay
dividends on or make other distributions in respect of our capital stock or make other restricted
payments; make certain investments; create liens; redeem junior debt; sell certain assets;
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; enter into
certain types of transactions with affiliates; and enter into sale-leaseback transactions. In
addition, we are required to use the proceeds of certain asset dispositions to offer to repurchase
our senior secured notes if we do not use the proceeds within 360 days to invest in assets (other
than current assets) to be used in our business; and this requirement limits our ability to use
asset sale proceeds to fund our operations. The restrictions imposed by the agreement governing our
accounts receivable financing facility and the indenture governing our senior secured notes may
prevent us from taking actions that could help to grow our business or increase the value of our
securities.
We are subject to the risks of doing business internationally.
For the fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, net revenues from customers located
outside of the United States (U.S.), primarily in the Asia-Pacific region, represented
approximately 91% and 99%, respectively, of our total net revenues. For the nine fiscal months
ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, net revenues from customers located outside of the U.S.,
primarily in the Asia-Pacific region, represented approximately 94% and 97%, respectively, of our
total net revenues. In addition, many of our key suppliers are located outside of the U.S. Our
international operations consist of research and development, sales offices, and other general and
administrative functions. Our international operations are subject to a number of risks inherent in
operating abroad. These include, but are not limited to, risks regarding:
33
|
|
|
difficulty in obtaining distribution and support; |
|
|
|
|
local economic and political conditions; |
|
|
|
|
limitations on our ability under local laws to protect our intellectual property; |
|
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions of commerce and capital or trading markets due to or related to
terrorist activity, armed conflict, or natural disasters; |
|
|
|
|
restrictive governmental actions, such as restrictions on the transfer or
repatriation of funds and trade protection measures, including export duties and quotas
and customs duties and tariffs; |
|
|
|
|
the laws and policies of the U.S. and other countries affecting trade, foreign
investment and loans, and import or export licensing requirements; and |
|
|
|
|
tax laws, including the cost of services provided and products sold between us and our
subsidiaries which are subject to review by taxing authorities. |
Recently proposed significant changes to the U.S. international tax laws would limit U.S.
deductions for expenses related to un-repatriated foreign-source income and modify the U.S. foreign
tax credit and check-the-box rules. We cannot determine whether these proposals will be enacted
into law or what, if any, changes may be made to such proposals prior to their being enacted into
law. If the U.S. tax laws change in a manner that increases our tax obligation, it could result in
a material adverse impact on our net income and our financial position.
Further, because most of our international sales are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, our
products could become less competitive in international markets if the value of the U.S. dollar
increases relative to foreign currencies. From time to time, we may enter into foreign currency
forward exchange contracts to minimize risk of loss from currency exchange rate fluctuations for
foreign currency commitments entered into during the ordinary course of business. We have not
entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts for other purposes. As of July 2, 2010, we
did not have any outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Our financial condition
and results of operations could be affected (adversely or favorably) by currency fluctuations.
We also conduct a significant portion of our international sales through distributors. Sales to
distributors and other resellers accounted for approximately 25% and 36% of our net revenues for
the fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively, and 24% and 30% for the nine
fiscal months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. Our arrangements with these
distributors are terminable at any time, and the loss of these arrangements could have an adverse
effect on our operating results.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to effect suitable investments, alliances,
acquisitions and where appropriate, divestitures and restructurings.
Although we invest significant resources in research and development activities, the complexity and
speed of technological changes make it impractical for us to pursue development of all
technological solutions on our own. On an ongoing basis, we review investment, alliance and
acquisition prospects that would complement our existing product offerings, augment our market
coverage or enhance our technological capabilities. However, we cannot assure you that we will be
able to identify and consummate suitable investment, alliance or acquisition transactions in the
future.
Moreover, if we consummate such transactions, they could result in:
|
|
|
large initial one-time write-offs of in-process research and development; |
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial debt and assumption of unknown liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key employees from the acquired company; |
34
|
|
|
amortization expenses related to intangible assets; and |
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other business concerns. |
Integrating acquired organizations and their products and services may be expensive, time-consuming
and a strain on our resources and our relationships with employees and customers, and ultimately
may not be successful. The process of integrating operations could cause an interruption of, or
loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of our products and the loss of key personnel.
The diversion of managements attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection
with acquisitions and the integration of multiple operations could have an adverse effect on our
business, results of operations or financial condition.
Moreover, in the event that we have unprofitable operations or products we may be forced to
restructure or divest such operations or products. There is no guarantee that we will be able to
restructure or divest such operations or products on a timely basis or at a value that will avoid
further losses or that will successfully mitigate the negative impact on our overall operations or
financial results.
Uncertainties involving the ordering and shipment of our products could adversely affect our
business.
Our sales are typically made pursuant to individual purchase orders and we generally do not have
long-term supply arrangements with our customers. Generally, our customers may cancel orders until
30 days prior to shipment. In addition, we sell a portion of our products through distributors and
other resellers, some of whom have a right to return unsold products to us. Sales to distributors
and other resellers accounted for approximately 25% and 36% of our net revenues for the fiscal
quarters ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively, and 24% and 30% for the nine fiscal
months ended July 2, 2010 and July 3, 2009, respectively. Our distributors may offer products of
several different suppliers, including products that may be competitive with ours. Accordingly,
there is a risk that the distributors may give priority to other suppliers products and may not
sell our products as quickly as forecasted, which may impact the distributors future order levels.
We routinely purchase inventory based on estimates of end-market demand for our customers
products, which is difficult to predict. This difficulty may be compounded when we sell to OEMs
indirectly through distributors and other resellers or contract manufacturers, or both, as our
forecasts of demand are then based on estimates provided by multiple parties. In addition, our
customers may change their inventory practices on short notice for any reason. The cancellation or
deferral of product orders, the return of previously sold products or overproduction due to the
failure of anticipated orders to materialize could result in our holding excess or obsolete
inventory, which could result in write-downs of inventory.
We are dependent upon third parties for the manufacture, assembly and test of our products.
We are entirely dependent upon outside wafer fabrication facilities (known as foundries or fabs).
Therefore, our revenue growth is dependent on our ability to obtain sufficient external
manufacturing capacity, including wafer fabrication capacity. If the semiconductor industry
experiences a shortage of wafer fabrication capacity in the future, we risk experiencing delays in
access to key process technologies, production or shipments and increased manufacturing costs.
Moreover, our foundry partners often require significant amounts of financing in order to build or
expand wafer fabrication facilities. However, current unfavorable economic conditions have also
resulted in a tightening in the credit markets, decreased the level of liquidity in many financial
markets and resulted in significant volatility in the credit and equity markets. These conditions
may make it difficult for foundries to obtain adequate or historical levels of capital to finance
the building or expansion of their wafer fabrication facilities, which would have an adverse impact
on their production capacity and could in turn negatively impact our wafer output. In addition,
certain of our suppliers have required that we keep in place standby letters of credit for all or
part of the products we order. Such requirement, or a requirement that we pre-pay for all or part
of vendor invoices or that we shorten our payment cycle times in the future, may negatively impact
our liquidity and cash position, or may not be available to us due to our then current liquidity or
cash position, and would have a negative impact on our ability to produce and deliver products to
our customers on a timely basis.
The foundries we use may allocate their limited capacity to fulfill the production requirements of
other customers that are larger and better financed than us. If we choose to use a new foundry, it
typically takes several months to redesign our products for the process
35
technology and intellectual property cores of the new foundry and to complete the qualification
process before we can begin shipping products from the new foundry.
We are also dependent upon third parties for the assembly and testing of our products. Our reliance
on others to assemble and test our products subjects us to many of the same risks that we have with
respect to our reliance on outside wafer fabrication facilities.
Wafer fabrication processes are subject to obsolescence, and foundries may discontinue a wafer
fabrication process used for certain of our products. In such event, we generally offer our
customers a last time buy program to satisfy their anticipated requirements for our products. The
unanticipated discontinuation of wafer fabrication processes on which we rely may adversely affect
our revenues and our customer relationships.
In the event of a disruption of the operations of one or more of our suppliers, we may not have a
second manufacturing source immediately available. Such an event could cause significant delays in
shipments until we could shift the products from an affected facility or supplier to another
facility or supplier. The manufacturing processes we rely on are specialized and are available from
a limited number of suppliers. Alternate sources of manufacturing capacity, particularly wafer
fabrication capacity, may not be available to us on a timely basis. Even if alternate wafer
fabrication capacity is available, we may not be able to obtain it on favorable terms, or at all.
All such delays or disruptions could impair our ability to meet our customers requirements and
have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
In addition, the highly complex and technologically demanding nature of semiconductor manufacturing
has caused foundries from time to time to experience lower than anticipated manufacturing yields,
particularly in connection with the introduction of new products and the installation and start-up
of new process technologies. Lower than anticipated manufacturing yields may affect our ability to
fulfill our customers demands for our products on a timely basis and may adversely affect our cost
of goods sold and our results of operations.
If we are not successful in protecting our intellectual property rights, it may harm our ability to
compete.
We use a significant amount of intellectual property in our business. We rely primarily on patent,
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements
and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies and processes. At times, we incorporate
intellectual property licensed from our customers and other third parties into our designs, and we
have obligations with respect to the non-use and non-disclosure of their intellectual property. In
the past, we have engaged in litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our
trade secrets or to determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights of others, including our
customers. We may engage in future litigation on similar grounds, which may require us to expend
significant resources and to divert the efforts and attention of our management from our business
operations. We cannot assure you that:
|
|
|
the steps we take to prevent misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual
property or the intellectual property of our customers will be successful; |
|
|
|
|
any existing or future patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented; or |
|
|
|
|
any of the measures described above would provide meaningful protection. |
Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use
our technology without authorization, develop similar technology independently or design around our
patents. If any of our patents fails to protect our technology, it would make it easier for our
competitors to offer similar products. In addition, effective patent, copyright, trademark and
trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain countries.
A significant portion of our intellectual property rights is located in foreign jurisdictions.
Because of the differences in foreign patent, trademark and other laws concerning proprietary
rights, our intellectual property rights frequently do not receive the same degree of protection in
foreign jurisdictions as they would in the U.S. Our failure to obtain or maintain adequate
protection of our intellectual property rights for any reason could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
36
We may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights or demands
that we license third-party technology, which could result in significant expense and loss of our
ability to use, make, sell, export or import our products or one or more components comprising our
products.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual
property rights. From time to time, third parties have asserted and may in the future assert
patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are
important to our business and have demanded and may in the future demand that we license their
patents and technologies. Any litigation to determine the validity of claims that our products
infringe or may infringe these rights, including claims arising through our contractual
indemnification of our customers, regardless of their merit or resolution, could be costly and
divert the efforts and attention of our management and technical personnel. We cannot assure you
that we would prevail in litigation given the complex technical issues and inherent uncertainties
in intellectual property litigation. If litigation results in an adverse ruling we could be
required to:
|
|
|
pay substantial damages; |
|
|
|
|
cease the manufacture, use or sale of infringing products, processes or technologies; |
|
|
|
|
discontinue the use of infringing technology; |
|
|
|
|
expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology, which we may not be
successful in developing; or |
|
|
|
|
license technology from the third party claiming infringement, which license may not
be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. |
The price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for you to
resell your common stock when you want or at prices you find attractive.
The price of our common stock is volatile and may fluctuate significantly. For example, since
September 29, 2007, the price of our stock has ranged from a high of $14.80 per share to a low of
$0.26 per share. We cannot assure you as to the prices at which our common stock will trade or that
an active trading market in our common stock will be sustained in the future. In addition to the
matters discussed in other risk factors included herein, some of the reasons for fluctuations in
our stock price could include:
|
|
|
our operating and financial performance and prospects; |
|
|
|
|
the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
investor perception of us and the industry in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
the level of research coverage of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by analysts; |
|
|
|
|
general financial, domestic, international, economic and other market conditions; |
|
|
|
|
proposed acquisitions by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
the hiring or departure of key personnel; and |
|
|
|
|
adverse judgments or settlements obligating us to pay damages. |
In addition, public stock markets have experienced, and may in the future experience, extreme price
and trading volume volatility, particularly in the technology sectors of the market. This
volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies
for reasons frequently unrelated to or disproportionately impacted by the operating performance of
these companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our
common stock.
37
We own or lease a significant amount of space in which we do not conduct operations, and doing so
exposes us to the financial risks of default by our tenants and subtenants and expenses related to
carrying vacant property.
As a result of our various reorganization and restructuring related activities, we lease or own a
number of domestic facilities in which we do not operate. At July 2, 2010, we had 407,175 square
feet of leased space and 456,000 square feet of owned space, of which approximately 89% was being
leased to third parties and 11% was vacant and offered for lease. Included in these amounts are
389,000 square feet of owned space in Newport Beach, California that we have leased to TowerJazz.
As of July 2, 2010, the aggregate amount owed to landlords under space we lease but do not operate
over the remaining terms of the leases was approximately $59.8 million and, of this amount,
subtenants had lease obligations to us in the aggregate amount of $13.0 million. The space we have
subleased to others is, in some cases, at rates less than the amounts we are required to pay
landlords and, of the aggregate obligations we had to landlords for unused space at July 2, 2010,
approximately $8.7 million was attributable to space we were attempting to sublease. In the event
one or more of our subtenants fails to make lease payments to us or otherwise defaults on their
obligations to us, we could incur substantial unanticipated payment obligations to landlords. In
addition, in the event tenants of space we own fail to make lease payments to us or otherwise
default on their obligations to us, we could be required to seek new tenants and we cannot assure
you that our efforts to do so would be successful or that the rates at which we could do so would
be attractive. In the event our estimates regarding our ability to sublet our available space are
incorrect, we would be required to adjust our restructuring reserves, which could have a material
impact on our financial results in the future.
We have historically incurred substantial losses and may incur additional future losses.
Our loss from continuing operations for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2009, October 3, 2008 and
September 28, 2007 was $40.5 million, $12.7 million and $179.3 million, respectively. These results
have had a negative impact on our financial condition and operating cash flows. We cannot assure
you that our business will be profitable or that we will not incur additional substantial losses in
the future. Additional operating losses or lower than expected product sales will adversely affect
our cash flow and financial condition and could impair our ability to satisfy our indebtedness
obligations as such obligations come due.
The value of our warrant to purchase 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock is subject to
material increases and decreases in value based on factors beyond our control.
We have a warrant to purchase approximately 6.1 million shares of Mindspeed common stock at an
exercise price of $16.74 per share through June 2013. At July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, the
market value of Mindspeed common stock was $6.67 and $3.05 per share, respectively. We account for
the Mindspeed warrant as a derivative instrument, and changes in the fair value of the warrant are
included under other expense (income), net in the statement of operations for each period. At July
2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, the aggregate fair value of the Mindspeed warrant included on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets was $16.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively. At July
2, 2010, the warrant was valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton model with an expected term of 3.00
years, expected volatility of 96%, risk-free interest rate of 1.00% and no dividend yield. The
aggregate fair value of the warrant is reflected as a long-term asset on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets because we do not intend to liquidate any portion of the warrant in the
next twelve months. At July 2, 2010 and October 2, 2009, the value of the warrant represented 5%
and 1%, respectively, of total assets.
The valuation of this derivative instrument is subjective, and option valuation models require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Changes in
these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. We could, at any point in time,
ultimately realize amounts significantly different than the carrying value.
We may not be able to attract and retain qualified management, technical and other personnel
necessary for the design, development and sale of our products. Our success could be negatively
affected if key personnel leave.
Our future success depends on our ability to attract and to retain the continued service and
availability of skilled personnel at all levels of our business. As the source of our technological
and product innovations, our key technical personnel represent a significant asset. The competition
for such personnel can be intense. While we have entered into employment agreements with some of
our key
38
personnel, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and retain qualified management and
other personnel necessary for the design, development and sale of our products.
Litigation could be costly and harmful to our business.
We are involved in various claims and lawsuits from time to time. For example, in February 2005,
certain of our current and former officers and our Employee Benefits Plan Committee were named as
defendants in a purported breach of fiduciary duties class action lawsuit that we recently settled
for $3.25 million. Any of these claims or legal actions could adversely affect our business,
financial position and results of operations and divert managements attention and resources from
other matters.
If any of the tax holidays or favorable tax incentives under which we operate in certain foreign
jurisdictions are terminated, our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We currently operate under tax holidays and favorable tax incentives in certain foreign
jurisdictions. While we believe we qualify for these incentives that reduce our income taxes and
operating costs, the incentives require us to meet specified criteria, which are subject to audit
and review. We cannot assure that we will continue to meet such criteria and enjoy such tax
holidays and incentives or realize any tax benefits from the tax holidays and incentives. If any
of our tax holidays or incentives are terminated, our results of operations may be materially and
adversely affected.
Our ability to use our net operating losses (NOLs) and other tax attributes to offset future
taxable income could be limited by an ownership change and/or decisions by California and other
states to suspend the use of NOLs.
We have significant NOLs, R&D tax credits, capitalized R&D and amortizable goodwill available to
offset our future U.S. federal and state taxable income. A significant amount of our NOLs were
acquired in the acquisition of certain of our subsidiaries. Those NOLs are subject to limitations
imposed by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (and applicable state law). In addition, our
ability to utilize any of our NOLs and other tax attributes may be subject to significant
limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (and applicable state law) if we undergo
an ownership change. An ownership change occurs for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code if, among other things, 5% stockholders (i.e., stockholders who own or have owned 5% or more
of our stock (with certain groups of less-than-5% stockholders treated as single stockholders for
this purpose)) increase their aggregate percentage ownership of our common stock by more than fifty
percentage points above the lowest percentage of the stock owned by these stockholders at any time
during the relevant testing period. Stock ownership for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code is determined under a complex set of attribution rules, so that a person is treated as
owning stock directly, indirectly (i.e., through certain entities) and constructively (through
certain related persons and certain unrelated persons acting as a group). In the event of an
ownership change, Section 382 imposes an annual limitation (based upon our value at the time of the
ownership change, as determined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code) on the amount of
taxable income a corporation may offset with NOLs. If we undergo an ownership change, Section 383
would also limit our ability to use R&D tax credits. In addition, if the tax basis of our assets
exceeded the fair market value of our assets at the time of the ownership change, Section 382 could
also limit our ability to use amortization of capitalized R&D and goodwill to offset taxable income
for the first five years following an ownership change. Any unused annual limitation may be carried
over to later years until the applicable expiration date for the respective NOLs. As a result, our
inability to utilize these NOLs, credits or amortization as a result of any ownership changes could
adversely impact our operating results and financial condition.
In addition, California and certain states have suspended use of NOLs and credits for certain
taxable years, and other states are considering similar measures. As a result, we may incur higher
state income tax expense in the future. Depending on our future tax position, continued suspension
of our ability to use NOLs, credits and tax attributes in states in which we are subject to income
tax could have an adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.
39
In the event of a change of control, we may not be able to repurchase our outstanding debt as
required by the applicable indenture, which would result in a default under the indenture.
Upon a change of control, we will be required to offer to repurchase all of our senior notes at
101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable
repurchase date. As of July 2, 2010, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the senior
notes was $175.0 million. Future debt agreements may contain similar provisions. We may not have
the financial resources to repurchase our indebtedness.
We have significant goodwill and intangible assets, and future impairment of our goodwill and
intangible assets could have a material negative impact on our financial condition and results of
operations.
At July 2, 2010, we had $109.9 million of goodwill and $4.6 million of intangible assets, net,
which together represented approximately 37% of our total assets. In periods subsequent to an
acquisition, at least on an annual basis or when indicators of impairment exist, we must evaluate
goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets for impairment. When such assets are found to be
impaired, they will be written down to estimated fair value, with a charge against earnings. If our
market capitalization drops below our book value for a prolonged period of time, our assumptions
regarding our future operating performance change or other indicators of impairment are present, we
may be required to write-down the value of our goodwill and acquisition-related intangible assets
by taking a charge against earnings.
Our remaining goodwill is associated with our business. Goodwill is tested at the reporting unit
level annually in the fourth fiscal quarter and, if necessary, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. During the fourth fiscal
quarter of 2009, we determined that the fair value of our business was greater than its carrying
value and therefore there was no impairment of goodwill as of October 2, 2009. There were no
indicators of impairment requiring testing during the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2010. Because of
the significance of our remaining goodwill and intangible asset balances, any future impairment of
these assets could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations, although, as a charge, it would have no effect on our cash flow. Significant
impairments may also impact shareholders equity (deficit).
Our revenues, cash flow from operations and results of operations have fluctuated in the past and
may fluctuate in the future, particularly given adverse domestic and global economic conditions.
Our revenues, cash flow and results of operations have fluctuated in the past and may fluctuate in
the future. These fluctuations are due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our
control. These factors include, among others:
|
|
|
changes in end-user demand for the products manufactured and sold by our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of receipt, reduction or cancellation of significant orders by customers; |
|
|
|
|
adverse economic conditions, including the unavailability or high cost of credit to our
customers; |
|
|
|
|
the inability of our customers to forecast demand based on adverse economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
seasonal customer demand; |
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant customers; |
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products and our customers products; |
40
|
|
|
our ability to develop, introduce and market new products and technologies on a timely
basis; |
|
|
|
|
the timing and extent of product development costs; |
|
|
|
|
new product and technology introductions by competitors; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products we develop and sell; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in manufacturing yields; |
|
|
|
|
availability and cost of products from our suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
intellectual property disputes; and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of competitive pricing pressures, including decreases in average selling prices
of our products. |
The foregoing factors are difficult to forecast, and these, as well as other factors, could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flow and results of operations.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(a) or 15d-15(a). |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(a) or 15d-15(a). |
|
32 |
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
41
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 2, 2010 |
By |
/s/ JEAN HU
|
|
|
|
Jean Hu |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Senior Vice President, Business Development
(principal financial officer) |
|
42
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(a) or 15d-15(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(a) or 15d-15(a). |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. |
43