PROASSURANCE CORPORATION
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-16533
ProAssurance Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
63-1261433 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
100 Brookwood Place, Birmingham, AL
|
|
35209 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(205) 877-4400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name, Former Address, and Former Fiscal Year,
if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 1, 2008 there were 33,492,005 shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Any statements in this Form 10Q that are not historical facts are specifically identified as
forward-looking statements. These statements are based upon our estimates and anticipation of
future events and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
vary materially from the expected results described in the forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are identified by words such as, but not limited to, anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect, hope, hopeful, intend, may, optimistic, preliminary,
potential, project, should, will and other analogous expressions. There are numerous
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. Thus, sentences and phrases that we use to convey our view of future events and trends
are expressly designated as forward-looking statements as are sections of this Form 10Q that are
identified as giving our outlook on future business.
Forward-looking statements relating to our business include among other things: statements
concerning liquidity and capital requirements, return on equity, financial ratios, net income,
premiums, losses and loss reserves, premium rates and retention of current business, competition
and market conditions, the expansion of product lines, the development or acquisition of business
in new geographical areas, the availability of acceptable reinsurance, actions by regulators and
rating agencies, court actions, legislative actions, payment or performance of obligations under
indebtedness, payment of dividends, and other matters.
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and
uncertainties, including, among other things, the following factors that could affect the actual
outcome of future events:
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, that are
different than anticipated; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory, legislative and judicial actions or decisions that affect our
business plans or operations; |
|
|
|
|
inflation, particularly in loss costs trends; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the interest rate environment; |
|
|
|
|
performance of financial markets affecting the fair value of our investments or
making it difficult to determine the value of our investments; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws or government regulations affecting medical professional
liability insurance; |
|
|
|
|
changes to our ratings assigned by rating agencies; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of changes in the health care delivery system; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainties inherent in the estimate of loss and loss adjustment expense
reserves and reinsurance, and changes in the availability, cost, quality, or
collectibility of insurance/reinsurance; |
|
|
|
|
the results of litigation, including pre-or-post-trial motions, trials and/or
appeals we undertake; |
|
|
|
|
bad faith litigation which may arise from our handling of any particular claim,
including failure to settle; |
|
|
|
|
changes in competition among insurance providers and related pricing weaknesses
in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
loss of independent agents; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to purchase reinsurance and collect payments from our reinsurers; |
|
|
|
|
increases in guaranty fund assessments; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve continued growth through expansion into other states or
through acquisitions or business combinations; |
|
|
|
|
the expected benefits from acquisitions may not be achieved or may be delayed
longer than expected due to, among other reasons, business disruption, loss of
customers and employees, increased operating costs or inability to achieve cost
savings, and assumption of greater than expected liabilities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices that may be adopted by our
regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the Securities
and Exchange Commission; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain and recruit senior management. |
2
Our results may differ materially from those we expect and discuss in any forward-looking
statements. The principal risk factors that may cause these differences are described in Item 1A,
Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10K and other documents we file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, such as our current reports on Form 8-K, and our regular reports on Forms 10-Q
and 10-K.
We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date made, and advise readers that the factors listed above could affect our
financial performance and could cause actual results for future periods to differ materially from
any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.
Except as required by law or regulations, we do not undertake and specifically decline any
obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the
occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
3
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale, at fair value |
|
$ |
3,172,913 |
|
|
$ |
3,236,739 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
16,056 |
|
|
|
15,451 |
|
Equity securities, trading, at fair value |
|
|
16,054 |
|
|
|
14,173 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
307,208 |
|
|
|
229,817 |
|
Business owned life insurance |
|
|
62,689 |
|
|
|
61,509 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
47,484 |
|
|
|
26,767 |
|
Other |
|
|
52,008 |
|
|
|
54,939 |
|
|
|
|
Total Investments |
|
|
3,674,412 |
|
|
|
3,639,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
8,389 |
|
|
|
30,274 |
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
94,720 |
|
|
|
98,693 |
|
Receivable from reinsurers on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
281,149 |
|
|
|
327,111 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
13,827 |
|
|
|
14,835 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
108,613 |
|
|
|
103,105 |
|
Real estate, net |
|
|
23,962 |
|
|
|
24,004 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
171,902 |
|
|
|
203,391 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,376,974 |
|
|
$ |
4,440,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy liabilities and accruals: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
2,506,661 |
|
|
$ |
2,559,707 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
207,775 |
|
|
|
218,028 |
|
Reinsurance premiums payable |
|
|
124,840 |
|
|
|
128,582 |
|
|
|
|
Total Policy Liabilities |
|
|
2,839,276 |
|
|
|
2,906,317 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
118,711 |
|
|
|
115,263 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
164,380 |
|
|
|
164,158 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
3,122,367 |
|
|
|
3,185,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share
100,000,000 shares authorized, 33,640,830 and
33,570,685 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
514,173 |
|
|
|
505,923 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred
tax expense (benefit) of ($8,078) and $5,334, respectively |
|
|
(15,006 |
) |
|
|
9,902 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
872,352 |
|
|
|
793,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,371,856 |
|
|
|
1,309,327 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,362,013 shares and 1,128,111 shares, respectively |
|
|
(117,249 |
) |
|
|
(54,257 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,254,607 |
|
|
|
1,255,070 |
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,376,974 |
|
|
$ |
4,440,808 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
4
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Capital (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
Retained |
Capital |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Earnings |
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,255,070 |
|
|
$ |
9,902 |
|
|
$ |
793,166 |
|
|
$ |
452,002 |
|
Net income |
|
|
79,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
(24,908 |
) |
|
|
(24,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(62,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,992 |
) |
Common shares issued as compensation |
|
|
3,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,687 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,545 |
|
Net effect of stock options exercised |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,254,607 |
|
|
|
($15,006 |
) |
|
$ |
872,352 |
|
|
$ |
397,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
Retained |
Capital |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Earnings |
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,118,547 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
622,310 |
|
|
$ |
496,126 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
73,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
(28,293 |
) |
|
|
(28,293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(20,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,012 |
) |
Common shares issued as compensation |
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,137 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
Net effect of stock options exercised |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,154,254 |
|
|
$ |
(28,182 |
) |
|
$ |
698,691 |
|
|
$ |
483,745 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
5
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
88,005 |
|
|
$ |
105,747 |
|
|
$ |
248,272 |
|
|
$ |
291,049 |
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
78,784 |
|
|
$ |
90,867 |
|
|
$ |
227,199 |
|
|
$ |
262,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
126,407 |
|
|
$ |
148,622 |
|
|
$ |
258,425 |
|
|
$ |
299,306 |
|
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(10,639 |
) |
|
|
(15,959 |
) |
|
|
(22,080 |
) |
|
|
(29,466 |
) |
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
115,768 |
|
|
|
132,663 |
|
|
|
236,345 |
|
|
|
269,840 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
41,313 |
|
|
|
44,548 |
|
|
|
82,372 |
|
|
|
87,119 |
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
1,831 |
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(5,349 |
) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(6,775 |
) |
|
|
(2,885 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
153,066 |
|
|
|
180,134 |
|
|
|
312,692 |
|
|
|
359,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
77,715 |
|
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
168,294 |
|
|
|
239,651 |
|
Reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(12,044 |
) |
|
|
(11,257 |
) |
|
|
(20,940 |
) |
|
|
(41,811 |
) |
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
65,671 |
|
|
|
98,793 |
|
|
|
147,354 |
|
|
|
197,840 |
|
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses |
|
|
25,157 |
|
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
51,399 |
|
|
|
52,475 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
5,944 |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
93,120 |
|
|
|
127,425 |
|
|
|
203,467 |
|
|
|
256,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
59,946 |
|
|
|
52,709 |
|
|
|
109,225 |
|
|
|
102,753 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current expense (benefit) |
|
|
16,770 |
|
|
|
10,607 |
|
|
|
22,135 |
|
|
|
22,204 |
|
Deferred expense (benefit) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
4,481 |
|
|
|
7,904 |
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,628 |
|
|
|
15,088 |
|
|
|
30,039 |
|
|
|
29,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
43,318 |
|
|
$ |
37,621 |
|
|
$ |
79,186 |
|
|
$ |
73,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
31,868 |
|
|
|
33,178 |
|
|
|
32,025 |
|
|
|
33,236 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
34,739 |
|
|
|
36,093 |
|
|
|
34,904 |
|
|
|
36,125 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
6
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
43,318 |
|
|
$ |
37,621 |
|
|
$ |
79,186 |
|
|
$ |
73,711 |
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments,
after tax, net of reclassification adjustments |
|
|
(27,567 |
) |
|
|
(29,787 |
) |
|
|
(24,908 |
) |
|
|
(28,293 |
) |
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
15,751 |
|
|
$ |
7,834 |
|
|
$ |
54,278 |
|
|
$ |
45,418 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
7
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
79,186 |
|
|
$ |
73,711 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
7,789 |
|
Net realized investment (gains) losses |
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
Net sales (purchases) of trading portfolio securities |
|
|
(2,497 |
) |
|
|
(4,180 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7,904 |
|
|
|
6,838 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums receivable |
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
6,703 |
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(53,046 |
) |
|
|
(4,411 |
) |
Unearned premiums |
|
|
(10,253 |
) |
|
|
(7,590 |
) |
Reinsurance related assets and liabilities |
|
|
43,228 |
|
|
|
38,168 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,422 |
|
|
|
(28,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
98,958 |
|
|
|
94,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
(468,362 |
) |
|
|
(663,487 |
) |
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
(2,346 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(2,051 |
) |
Cash invested in unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(22,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale or maturities of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities available for sale |
|
|
485,276 |
|
|
|
672,888 |
|
Equity securities available for sale |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
7,045 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in short-term investments |
|
|
(77,390 |
) |
|
|
(106,821 |
) |
Other |
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
(8,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities |
|
|
(77,020 |
) |
|
|
(100,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(62,992 |
) |
|
|
(16,770 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from options exercised |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
Book overdraft |
|
|
13,330 |
|
|
|
10,594 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
|
(43,823 |
) |
|
|
(4,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(21,885 |
) |
|
|
(10,382 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
30,274 |
|
|
|
21,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
8,389 |
|
|
$ |
10,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Non-cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities transferred, at fair value, to other investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,732 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
8
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
ProAssurance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries (ProAssurance). The financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of
normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2008. The accompanying Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes contained in ProAssurances December 31, 2007 report on Form 10-K.
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior period consolidated financial statements
to conform to the current period presentation.
Accounting Changes
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS 157). The standard establishes a revised definition of fair value: fair value is
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a
framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 is applicable to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair
value measurements but does not establish new guidance regarding the assets and liabilities
required or allowed to be measured at fair value. The statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. ProAssurance adopted SFAS 157 on
January 1, 2008. ProAssurance did not recognize any cumulative effect related to the adoption of
SFAS 157 and adoption did not have a significant effect on ProAssurances results of operations or
financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits many financial assets and liabilities to be reported at fair value that are not otherwise
required under GAAP to be measured at fair value. Under SFAS 159 guidance, the election of fair
value treatment is specific to individual assets and liabilities, with changes in fair value
recognized in earnings as they occur. The election of fair value measurement is generally
irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early
adoption permitted. ProAssurance adopted SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008 but did not elect fair value
measurement for any financial assets or liabilities that were not otherwise required to be measured
at fair value.
Recent Accounting Developments
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which
will alter the accounting for ProAssurances Convertible Debentures. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers
to account for convertible debt securities that allow for either mandatory or optional cash
settlement (including partial cash settlement) by separating the liability and equity components in
a manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance and
requires recognition of additional (non-cash) interest expense in subsequent periods based on the
nonconvertible rate. Additionally, FSP APB 14-1 requires that when such debt instruments are repaid
or converted any consideration transferred at settlement should be allocated between the
extinguishment of the liability component and the reacquisition of the equity component. FSP APB
14-1 is effective for ProAssurance on January 1, 2009, and must be applied retrospectively with a
cumulative effect adjustment being made as of the earliest period presented. Early adoption is not
permitted. ProAssurance is currently assessing
9
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation (continued)
the impact that the adoption will have on its financial condition and results of operations, but
expects no impact on ending Total Stockholders Equity after the conversion of the Convertible Debentures
(July 2, 2008).
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. The Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. ProAssurance will
adopt the Statement on its effective date. Adoption is not expected to have an effect on
ProAssurances results of operations or financial position.
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS 141R
replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, but retains the fundamental requirement in
SFAS 141 that the acquisition method (referred to as the purchase method in SFAS 141) of accounting
be used for all business combinations. SFAS 141R provides new or additional guidance with respect
to business combinations including: defining the acquirer in a transaction, the valuation of assets
and liabilities when noncontrolling interests exist, the treatment of contingent consideration, the
treatment of costs incurred to effect the acquisition, the treatment of reorganization costs, and
the valuation of assets and liabilities when the purchase price is below the net fair value of
assets acquired. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. ProAssurance will adopt the Statement on its
effective date.
2. Fair Value Measurement
Effective January 1, 2008 ProAssurance adopted SFAS 157 which establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and requires specific disclosures regarding assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value.
As defined in SFAS 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. SFAS 157 establishes a three level hierarchy for valuing assets and liabilities
based on how transparent (observable) the inputs are that are used to determine fair value, with
the inputs considered most observable categorized as Level 1 and those that are the least
observable categorized as Level 3. Hierarchy levels are defined by SFAS 157 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities. For ProAssurance, Level 1 inputs are generally quotes for debt or
equity securities actively traded in exchange or over-the-counter markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
|
market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity
(observable inputs). For ProAssurance, Level 2 inputs generally include quoted
prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets/liabilities,
and other observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are
generally available at commonly quoted intervals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
|
the reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant assumptions
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).
For ProAssurance, Level 3 inputs are used in situations where little or no Level 1 or 2 inputs are
available or are inappropriate given the
particular circumstances. Level 3 inputs include results from pricing models
and discounted cash flow methodologies as well as adjustments to externally
quoted prices that are based on management judgment or estimation. |
10
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
2. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
The following tables present information about ProAssurances assets measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008, and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the valuation
techniques utilized to determine such value. No liabilities are measured at fair value at June 30,
2008. For some assets, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the
fair value hierarchy. When this is the case, the asset is categorized in the table based on the
lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
ProAssurances assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the assets being valued.
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
Total |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
217,282 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
217,282 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
893,248 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
894,824 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
5,071 |
|
|
|
597,408 |
|
|
|
60,487 |
|
|
|
662,966 |
|
State and municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,386,699 |
|
|
|
11,142 |
|
|
|
1,397,841 |
|
Equity securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
15,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
16,056 |
|
Equity securities, trading |
|
|
16,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,054 |
|
Other investments(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,156 |
|
|
|
19,156 |
|
Short-term investments(2) |
|
|
188,228 |
|
|
|
118,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,208 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
224,669 |
|
|
$ |
3,213,617 |
|
|
$ |
93,101 |
|
|
$ |
3,531,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other investments also include investments of $32.9 million accounted for using the cost method. |
|
(2) |
|
Short-term investments are reported at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
Level 3 assets in the above table consist primarily of asset-backed securities (as shown in
the table), private placement senior notes (included in Corporate bonds), auction rate municipal
bonds (included in State and Municipal bonds), and a beneficial interest in asset-backed securities
held in a private investment fund (included in Other investments).
The private placement senior notes are unconditionally guaranteed by large regional banks
rated A or better. The asset-backed securities have a weighted average rating of AA+, and are
collateralized by a timber trust and a Fannie Mae mortgage backed security. The auction rate
municipal bonds are rated AA-. The fair value of these assets are primarily derived using pricing
models that may require multiple market input parameters as is considered appropriate for the asset
being valued.
The asset-backed securities held in a private investment fund are rated BB+ and are valued
using a broker dealer quote.
11
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
2. Fair Value Measurement (continued)
The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair value using
Level 3 inputs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
Asset- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
backed |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Municipal |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Invested |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
|
$ |
64,703 |
|
|
$ |
15,621 |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
19,740 |
|
|
$ |
105,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses), realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of net
realized investment gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales or settlements |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
3,463 |
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
(2,934 |
) |
|
|
(10,798 |
) |
|
|
(993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,725 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
60,487 |
|
|
$ |
11,142 |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
19,156 |
|
|
$ |
93,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 related to assets still
held at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(883 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(490 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
33,283 |
|
|
$ |
86,969 |
|
|
$ |
7,183 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,981 |
|
|
$ |
148,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses), realized and unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings, as a part of net
realized investment gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,713 |
) |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,265 |
) |
|
|
(4,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales or settlements |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
14,128 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
13,748 |
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
(29,592 |
) |
|
|
(39,995 |
) |
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,584 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
60,487 |
|
|
$ |
11,142 |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
19,156 |
|
|
$ |
93,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) included in other
comprehensive income for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 related to assets still
held at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
$ |
(883 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,264 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,821 |
) |
|
|
|
The transfers out of Level 3 into Level 2 primarily consist of $40 million (including $11
million transferred after March 31, 2008) of bank loans and $30 million (including $3 million
transferred after March 31, 2008) of asset backed bonds that were previously valued using either a pricing model or a single
broker dealer quote. The securities are now priced using multiple observable inputs including
pricing services that use multiple broker quotes for their evaluation.
12
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
3. Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale fixed maturities and equity
securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
3,189,360 |
|
|
$ |
26,128 |
|
|
$ |
(42,575 |
) |
|
$ |
3,172,913 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
15,599 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
16,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,204,959 |
|
|
$ |
27,697 |
|
|
$ |
(43,687 |
) |
|
$ |
3,188,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
3,217,194 |
|
|
$ |
37,246 |
|
|
$ |
(17,701 |
) |
|
$ |
3,236,739 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
|
|
15,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,231,125 |
|
|
$ |
39,970 |
|
|
$ |
(18,905 |
) |
|
$ |
3,252,190 |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturities and equity securities during the six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007 are $228.3 million and $495.4 million, respectively, including proceeds from
sales of adjustable rate, short-duration fixed maturities of approximately $106.1 million and
$326.3 million, respectively. Purchases of adjustable rate, short-duration fixed maturities
approximated $77.3 million and $242.0 million during the same respective periods.
Net realized investment gains (losses) are comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains |
|
$ |
688 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,734 |
|
Gross realized (losses) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairment (losses) |
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,307 |
) |
|
|
(4,174 |
) |
Trading portfolio net gains (losses) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(5,349 |
) |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
(6,775 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,885 |
) |
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2008 ProAssurance recognized other-than-temporary impairment
losses of $5.5 million, which included $4.7 million related to asset backed bonds, $433,000 related
to corporate bonds and $271,000 related to equity holdings. During the first quarter of 2008
ProAssurance recognized impairment losses of $857,000 including impairments of $396,000 related to
asset backed bonds, $80,000 related to a corporate bond, $353,000 related to a passive investment
that ProAssurance holds in a private investment fund and $28,000 related to an equity position that
was sold shortly after the end of the first quarter. Other-than-temporary impairment losses
recognized in 2007 related to high yield asset backed bonds, particularly those with sub-prime loan
exposures.
In January 2007, ProAssurance transferred high yield asset backed bonds (previously considered as
available-for-sale securities) having a fair value of approximately $34.7 million to a private
investment fund that is primarily focused on managing such investments. ProAssurance maintains a
direct beneficial interest (the separate interest) in the securities originally contributed to the
fund. ProAssurance recognized an impairment of $4.2 million related to these securities in 2007.
The securities held in the separate interest are included in Other Investments, at fair value
totaling $14.1 million at June 30, 2008 (net of unrealized losses of $7.1 million). Cash flows of
the separate interest, including net investment earnings and proceeds from sales or maturities,
(totaling $12.0 million to date), are routinely transferred to a joint interest (the joint
interest) of the fund.
13
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
3. Investments (continued)
The joint interest is accounted for using the equity method and is included in Investment in
Unconsolidated Subsidiaries. In March 2008 ProAssurance contributed an additional $20 million to
the joint interest to take advantage of current dislocations in the credit market. At June 30, 2008
the carrying value of the joint interest is $30.7 million and ProAssurances ownership interest
approximates 22%.
4. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is different from that which would be obtained by applying the
statutory Federal income tax rate to income before taxes primarily because a portion of
ProAssurances investment income is tax-exempt.
5. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs, most significantly commissions, premium taxes, and underwriting
salaries, that are primarily and directly related to the production of new and renewal premiums are
capitalized as policy acquisition costs and amortized to expense as the related premium revenues
are earned.
Amortization of deferred acquisition costs are $11.7 million and $24.0 million for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008. Amortization of deferred acquisition costs was $13.2 million
and $26.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. Unamortized deferred
acquisition costs are included in Other Assets totaling $20.6 million and $22.1 million at June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007.
6. Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The reserve for losses is established based on estimates of individual claims and actuarially
determined estimates of future losses based on ProAssurances past loss experience, available
industry data and projections as to future claims frequency, severity, inflationary trends and
settlement patterns. Estimating reserves is a complex process. Claims may be resolved over an
extended period of time, often five years or more, and may be subject to litigation. Estimating
losses for liability claims requires ProAssurance to make and revise judgments and assessments
regarding multiple uncertainties over an extended period of time. As a result, reserve estimates
may vary significantly from the eventual outcome. The assumptions used in establishing
ProAssurances reserves are regularly reviewed and updated by management as new data becomes
available. Changes to estimates of previously established reserves are included in earnings in the
period in which the estimate is changed.
ProAssurance recognized favorable net loss development of $31.3 million related to previously
established reserves for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and recognized $51.3 million of
favorable net loss development for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The favorable net loss
development reflects reductions in the Companys estimates of claim severity, principally for the
2003 through 2006 accident years but also includes $3.7 million recognized in the second quarter of
2008 related to prior year reinsurance contracts that were commuted during the period.
ProAssurance recognized favorable net loss development of $20.0 million for the three months
and $35.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to reflect reductions in estimated claim
severity principally for accident years 2003 through 2005, offset by an increase to the reserves
for losses in excess of policy limits.
14
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
7. Long-term Debt
Outstanding long-term debt, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
December 31 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debentures due June 2023 but
all converted into common stock in July
2008, see below. Unsecured, principal of
$107.6 million bearing a fixed interest
rate of 3.9%, net of unamortized
discounts of $1.5 million and $1.6
million at June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively. |
|
$ |
106,121 |
|
|
$ |
105,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Subordinated Debentures
(the 2034 Subordinated Debentures),
unsecured, bearing interest at a
floating rate, adjustable quarterly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due |
|
6/30/2008 Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2034 |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
13,403 |
|
|
|
13,403 |
|
|
|
May 2034 |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
32,992 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surplus Notes due May 2034 (the Surplus
Notes), unsecured, net of unamortized
discounts of $0.1 million and $0.2
million at June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, principal of $12.0 million
bearing a fixed interest rate of 7.7%,
until May 2009. |
|
|
11,864 |
|
|
|
11,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
164,380 |
|
|
$ |
164,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debentures
On June 2, 2008 ProAssurance notified holders of its intent to redeem all of its outstanding
Convertible Debentures (aggregate principal amount of $107.6 million) on July 7, 2008. As discussed
in Note 11, prior to the redemption date all holders of the Convertible Debentures requested
conversion and on July 2, 2008 all of the Convertible Debentures were converted into 2,572,029
shares of ProAssurance Corporation common stock.
Fair Value
At June 30, 2008, the fair value of the 2034 Subordinated Debentures approximated 85% of their
face value of $46.4 million and the fair value of the Surplus Notes approximated 86% of their face
value of $12.0 million, based on the present value of underlying cash flows discounted at rates
available at June 30, 2008 for similar debt.
Additional Information
For additional information regarding the terms of ProAssurances outstanding long-term debt
see Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in ProAssurances December 31,
2007 Annual Report on Form 10K.
15
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
8. Stockholders Equity
At June 30, 2008 ProAssurance had 100 million shares of authorized common stock and 50 million
shares of authorized preferred stock. The Board of Directors of ProAssurance Corporation (the
Board) has the authority to determine the provisions for the issuance of preferred shares,
including the number of shares to be issued, the designations, powers, preferences and rights, and
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such shares. To date, no preferred stock has
been authorized or issued.
In 2007, the Board authorized $150 million to repurchase its common shares or debt securities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 approximately $63.0 million of the authorization was
utilized to repurchase approximately 1.2 million common shares, all of which are held as treasury
shares on June 30, 2008. Treasury shares are reported at cost, and are reflected on the balance
sheet as an unallocated reduction of total equity. As of June 30, 2008 approximately $17.3 million
of the Board repurchase authorization remains available for use.
As discussed in Note 11, on July 2, 2008 approximately 2.12 million treasury shares were
re-issued and 450,000 new common shares were issued to complete the conversion of ProAssurances
Convertible Debentures.
ProAssurance adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. In accordance with the guidance provided in the statement, the
cumulative effect of adoption, a $2.7 million reduction in tax liabilities, was recorded as an
increase to beginning retained earnings.
ProAssurance provides performance-based stock compensation to employees under the ProAssurance
2004 Equity Incentive Plan and the ProAssurance Corporation Incentive Compensation Stock Plan.
Share-based compensation expense of approximately $2.1 million and $4.5 million with a related tax
benefit of approximately $720,000 and $1.6 million was recognized during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008. Share-based compensation expense of approximately $1.5 million and $3.7
million with a related tax benefit of approximately $493,000 and $1.3 million was recognized during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
ProAssurance granted approximately 133,000 options during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The estimated fair value of the options averaged $16.49 per option. Fair values were estimated as
of the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
Weighted average assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.1% |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
0.23 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0% |
|
Expected average term (in years) |
|
|
6 |
|
16
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
8. Stockholders Equity (continued)
ProAssurance also granted Performance Share awards to employees in March 2008 under the
ProAssurance 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The Performance Share awards vest at the end of a three
year service period if specified Performance Measures are attained. The number of Performance
Shares ultimately awarded varies from 75% to 125% of the target award depending upon the degree to
which Performance Measures are attained. The fair value of each Performance Share was estimated as
the market value of ProAssurances common shares on the respective date of grant. The following
table provides information regarding ProAssurances Performance Shares awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
2008 |
100% vesting date |
|
|
12/31/2010 |
|
Shares awarded (target) |
|
|
73,000 |
|
Grant date fair value |
|
$ |
54.28 |
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
As
a result of the acquisition of NCRIC Corporation (NCRIC) in 2005, ProAssurance assumed the risk of loss for a
judgment entered against NCRIC on February 20, 2004 by a District of Columbia Superior Court in
favor of Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc. (CHW) in the amount of $18.2 million (the
judgment). The judgment is on appeal to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. ProAssurance has
established a liability related to the judgment of $22.1 million, which includes the estimated
costs associated with pursuing appellate relief and projected post-trial interest, $19.5 million of
which was established as a component of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in the allocation of the NCRIC purchase price. ProAssurance has posted a $21.1 million appellate
bond to secure payment of the judgment plus interest and costs, in the event the judgment is
ultimately affirmed and paid.
ProAssurance is involved in various other legal actions arising primarily from claims against
ProAssurance related to insurance policies and claims handling, including but not limited to claims
asserted by policyholders. Such legal actions have been considered by ProAssurance in establishing
its loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. The outcome of such legal actions is not presently
determinable for a number of reasons. For example, in the event that ProAssurance or its insureds
receive adverse verdicts, post-trial motions may be denied, in whole or in part; any appeals that
may be undertaken may be unsuccessful; ProAssurance may be unsuccessful in legal efforts to limit
the scope of coverage available to its insureds, and ProAssurance may become a party to bad faith
litigation over the amount of the judgment above an insureds policy limits. ProAssurances
management is of the opinion, based on consultation with legal counsel, that the resolution of
these actions will not have a material adverse effect on ProAssurances financial position.
However, the ultimate cost of resolving these legal actions may differ from the reserves
established; the resulting difference could have a material effect on ProAssurances results of
operations for the period in which any such action is resolved.
17
ProAssurance Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2008
10. Earnings Per Share
The following table provides detailed information regarding the calculation of basic and
diluted earnings per share for each period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
43,318 |
|
|
$ |
37,621 |
|
|
$ |
79,186 |
|
|
$ |
73,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
31,868 |
|
|
|
33,178 |
|
|
|
32,025 |
|
|
|
33,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
43,318 |
|
|
$ |
37,621 |
|
|
$ |
79,186 |
|
|
$ |
73,711 |
|
Effect of assumed conversion of contingently convertible
debt instruments |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
|
Net incomediluted computation |
|
$ |
44,060 |
|
|
$ |
38,363 |
|
|
$ |
80,670 |
|
|
$ |
75,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
31,868 |
|
|
|
33,178 |
|
|
|
32,025 |
|
|
|
33,236 |
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and issuance of
performance shares |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Assumed conversion of contingently convertible debt
instruments |
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average equivalent shares |
|
|
34,739 |
|
|
|
36,093 |
|
|
|
34,904 |
|
|
|
36,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS 128, Earnings per Share, the diluted weighted average number of shares
outstanding includes an incremental adjustment for the assumed exercise of dilutive stock options.
The adjustment is computed quarterly; the annual incremental adjustment is the average of the
quarterly adjustments. Stock options are considered dilutive stock options if the assumed exercise
of the options, using the treasury stock method as specified by SFAS 128, produces an increased
number of shares. Approximately 370,000 and 200,000 of ProAssurances outstanding options, on
average, were not considered to be dilutive during the six-months periods ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
11. Subsequent Event
On June 2, 2008, ProAssurance notified holders of its Convertible Debentures of its intent to
redeem 100% of its outstanding debentures (aggregate principal of $107.6 million) on July 7, 2008.
Prior to redemption, all holders of the Convertible Debentures requested conversion. The conversion
rate under the Indenture was 23.9037 shares of Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of
debentures surrendered for conversion. ProAssurance completed the conversion of all of the
outstanding debentures on July 2, 2008 by reissuing 2.12 million treasury shares and 450,000 newly
issued common shares. The transaction will result in a net increase to Stockholders Equity of
approximately $112 million in the third quarter of 2008. No gain or loss will be recorded related
to the conversion.
Approximately 360,000 common shares were repurchased in July 2008 which fully utilized the
purchase authorization that remained at June 30, 2008. On August 5, 2008 the Board of Directors of
ProAssurance authorized, effective immediately, an additional $100 million for the repurchase of
common shares or retirement of outstanding debt.
18
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to those statements which accompany this report as well
as ProAssurances Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which includes a
glossary of insurance terms and phrases. Throughout the discussion, references to ProAssurance,
we, us and our refers to ProAssurance Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. The
discussion contains certain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. As
discussed under Forward-Looking Statements, our actual financial condition and operating results
could differ significantly from these forward-looking statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts we
report on those statements. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis based
on current and historical developments, market conditions, industry trends and other information
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual
results will conform to our estimates and assumptions; reported results of operations may be
materially affected by changes in these estimates and assumptions.
Management considers the following accounting estimates to be critical because they involve
significant judgment by management and the effect of those judgments could result in a material
effect on our financial statements.
Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses (reserve for losses or reserve)
The largest component of our liabilities is our reserve for losses and the largest component
of expense for our operations is incurred losses. Net losses in any period reflect our estimate of
net losses incurred related to the premiums earned in that period as well as any changes to our
estimates of the reserve established for net losses of prior periods.
The estimation of medical professional liability losses is inherently difficult. Ultimate loss
costs, even for claims with similar characteristics, vary significantly depending upon many
factors, including but not limited to, the nature of the injury and the personal situation of the
claimant or the claimants family, the outcome of jury trials, the legislative and judicial climate
where the insured event occurred, general economic conditions and the trend of health care costs.
Medical professional liability claims are typically resolved over an extended period of time, often
five years or more. The combination of changing conditions and the extended time required for claim
resolution results in a loss cost estimation process that requires actuarial skill and the
application of judgment, and such estimates require periodic revision.
In establishing our reserve for losses, management considers a variety of factors including
claims frequency, historical paid and incurred loss development trends, the effect of inflation on
medical care, general economic trends and the legal environment. We perform an in-depth review of
our reserve for losses on a semi-annual basis. Additionally, during each reporting period we update
and review the data underlying the estimation of our reserve for losses and make adjustments that
we believe best reflect emerging data. Any adjustments are reflected in the then-current
operations. Due to the size of our reserve for losses, even a small percentage adjustment to these
estimates could have a material effect on our results of operations for the period in which the
adjustment is made.
19
Reinsurance
We use insurance and reinsurance (collectively, reinsurance) to provide capacity to write
larger limits of liability, to provide protection against losses in excess of policy limits, and to
stabilize underwriting results in years in which higher losses occur. The purchase of reinsurance
does not relieve us from the ultimate risk on our policies, but it does provide reimbursement for
certain losses we pay.
We evaluate each of our ceded reinsurance contracts at inception to determine if there is
sufficient risk transfer to allow the contract to be accounted for as reinsurance under current
accounting guidance. At June 30, 2008 all ceded contracts are accounted for as risk transferring
contracts.
Our receivable from reinsurers on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses represents our
estimate of the amount of our reserve for losses that will be recoverable under our insurance and
reinsurance programs. We base our estimate of funds recoverable upon our expectation of ultimate
losses and the portion of those losses that we estimate to be allocable to reinsurers based upon
the terms of our reinsurance agreements. As losses are paid, the related amount expected to be
collected from reinsurers is recorded as a receivable in Other Assets.
We estimate premiums ceded under reinsurance agreements wherein the premium due to the
reinsurer, subject to certain maximums and minimums, is based in part on losses reimbursed or to be
reimbursed under the agreement. Our estimates of the amounts due from and to reinsurers are
regularly reviewed and updated by management as new data becomes available. Our assessment of the
collectibility of the recorded amounts receivable from reinsurers considers the payment history of
the reinsurer, publicly available financial and rating agency data, our interpretation of the
underlying contracts and policies, and responses by reinsurers. Appropriate reserves are
established for any balances we believe may not be collected.
Given the uncertainty of the ultimate amounts of our losses, our estimates of losses and
related amounts recoverable may vary significantly from the eventual outcome. Any adjustments are
reflected in then-current operations. Due to the size of our reinsurance balances, an adjustment to
these estimates could have a material effect on our results of operations for the period in which
the adjustment is made.
Investment Valuations
We adopted a new accounting pronouncement, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 157,
Fair Value Measurements, effective January 1, 2008. The new pronouncement revises the definition of
fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value. The pronouncement defines fair
value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The framework establishes
a three level hierarchy for valuing assets and liabilities based on how transparent (observable)
the inputs are that are used to determine fair value. For example, a quoted market price for an
actively traded security on an established trading exchange is considered the most transparent
(observable) input used to fair value that security and is classified as a Level 1 in the fair
value hierarchy. An investment valued using multiple broker dealer quotes is considered to be
valued using observable input that is not as transparent as a quoted market price on an exchange
and is classified as a Level 2. An investment valued using either a single broker dealer quote or
based on a cash flow valuation model is considered to be valued based on limited observable input
and a significant amount of judgment and is classified as Level 3. For further information on the
adoption of the pronouncement and the fair value of our investments, see Note 2 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
A significant portion of our financial assets are comprised of investments recorded at fair
value. Of the Companys investments recorded at fair value totaling $3.5 billion, a substantial
percentage (approximately 97%) is based on observable market prices, observable market parameters
(i.e. broker quotes, benchmark yield curves, issuer spreads, bids, etc.) or is derived from such
prices or parameters. The availability of observable market prices and pricing parameters (referred
to as observable inputs) can vary from investment to investment. We utilize observable inputs,
where available, to value our investments. In many cases, we obtain multiple observable inputs for
an investment to derive the fair value without requiring significant judgments.
20
For investments that are not actively traded, limited or no observable inputs may be available
and fair value is determined using valuation techniques appropriate for that investment whether
valued internally or externally. The valuation techniques involve some degree of judgment. The
portion of our investments valued using less observable market inputs and valuation techniques
totaling $93 million (approximately 3% of investments recorded at fair value) consist of
asset-backed securities that are priced by external managers using single broker dealer quotes,
private placements, and auction rate securities and other investments valued internally by
management.
Most of our investments recorded at fair value are considered available-for-sale with a small
portion classified as trading. For investments considered as available-for-sale, changes in the
fair value are recognized as unrealized gains and losses and are included, net of related tax
effects, in stockholders equity as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Gains or
losses on these investments are recognized in earnings in the period the investment is sold or an
other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred. Changes in the fair value of
investments considered as trading are recorded in realized investment gains and losses in the
current period.
We also have other investments, primarily comprised of equity interests in private investment
funds (non-public investment partnerships and limited liability companies), $47.5 million of which
are accounted for using the equity method and $32.9 million of which are carried at cost. We
evaluate these investments for other-than-temporary impairment by considering any declines in fair
value below the recorded value. Determining whether there has been a decline in fair value involves
assumptions and estimates as there are typically no observable inputs to determine the fair value
of these investments.
We evaluate all our investments on at least a quarterly basis for declines in fair value that
represent other-than-temporary impairments. Some of the factors we consider in the evaluation of
our investments are:
|
|
|
the extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its
recorded basis, |
|
|
|
|
the length of time for which the fair value of the investment has been
less than its recorded basis, |
|
|
|
|
the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer underlying
the investment, taking into consideration the economic prospects of the
issuers industry and geographical region, to the extent that information
is publicly available, |
|
|
|
|
third party research and credit rating reports, |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which the decline in fair value is attributable to credit risk specifically
associated with an investment or its issuer, |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we believe market assessments of credit risk for a specific investment
or category of investments are either well founded or are speculative, |
|
|
|
|
our internal assessments and those of our external portfolio managers regarding specific
circumstances surrounding an investment, which can cause us to believe the investment is more or
less likely to recover its value than other investments with a similar structure, |
|
|
|
|
for asset backed securities: the origination date of the underlying loans, the remaining
average life, the probability that credit performance of the underlying loans will deteriorate in
the future, and our assessment of the quality of the collateral
underlying the loan, and |
|
|
|
|
our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. |
21
Determining whether a decline in the fair value of investments is an other-than-temporary
impairment may also involve a variety of assumptions and estimates, particularly for investments
that are not actively traded in established markets or during periods of market dislocation. For
example, assessing the value of certain investments requires us to perform an analysis of expected
future cash flows or prepayments. For investments in tranches of structured transactions, we are
required to assess the credit worthiness of the underlying investments of the structured
transaction.
When we judge a decline in fair value to be other-than-temporary, we reduce the basis of the
investment to fair value and recognize a loss in the current period income statement for the amount
of the reduction. In subsequent periods, we base any measurement of gain or loss or decline in
value upon the adjusted cost basis of the investment.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs, primarily commissions, premium taxes and underwriting salaries,
which are primarily and directly related to the acquisition of new and renewal premiums are
capitalized as deferred policy acquisition costs and charged to expense as the related premium
revenue is recognized. We evaluate the recoverability of our deferred policy acquisition costs and
any amounts estimated to be unrecoverable are charged to expense in the current period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Guidance
In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible
Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement),
which will alter the accounting for our Convertible Debentures. FSP APB 14-1 requires issuers to
account for convertible debt securities that allow for either mandatory or optional cash settlement
(including partial cash settlement) by separating the liability and equity components in a manner
that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance and requires
recognition of additional (non-cash) interest expense in subsequent periods based on the
nonconvertible rate. Additionally, FSP APB 14-1 requires that when such debt instruments are repaid
or converted any consideration transferred at settlement should be allocated between the
extinguishment of the liability component and the reacquisition of the equity component. FSP APB
14-1 will become effective for ProAssurance on January 1, 2009 and must be applied retrospectively
with a cumulative effect adjustment being made as of the earliest period presented. Early adoption
is not permitted. We are currently assessing the impact that the adoption will have on our
financial condition and results of operations but expect no impact on
Total Stockholders Equity after
the conversion of the Convertible Debentures (July 2, 2008).
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. The Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We will adopt the
Statement on its effective date. The adoption is not expected to have an effect on our results of
operations or financial position.
22
In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS 141 (Revised December 2007), Business Combinations. SFAS
141R replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, but retains the fundamental
requirement in SFAS 141 that the acquisition method (referred to as the purchase method in SFAS
141) of accounting be used for all business combinations. SFAS 141R provides new or additional
guidance with respect to business combinations including: defining the acquirer in a transaction,
the valuation of assets and liabilities when noncontrolling interests exist, the treatment of
contingent consideration, the treatment of costs incurred to effect the acquisition, the treatment
of reorganization costs, and the valuation of assets and liabilities when the purchase price is
below the net fair value of assets acquired. SFAS 141R applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We will
adopt the Statement on its effective date.
Accounting Changes
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. The standard revises the
definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is applicable to other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements but does not establish new guidance
regarding the assets and liabilities required or allowed to be measured at fair value. The
statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption
permitted. We adopted SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. We did not recognize any cumulative effect
related to the adoption of SFAS 157 and the adoption did not have a significant effect on our
results of operations or financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS 159 permits many
financial assets and liabilities to be reported at fair value that are not otherwise required under
GAAP to be measured at fair value. Under SFAS 159 guidance, the election of fair value treatment is
specific to individual assets and liabilities, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as
they occur. The election of fair value measurement is generally irrevocable. SFAS 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. We adopted SFAS
159 on January 1, 2008 but did not elect fair value measurement for any financial assets or
liabilities that were not otherwise required to be measured at fair value.
23
Liquidity and Capital Resources and Financial Condition
Overview
ProAssurance Corporation is a holding company and is a legal entity separate and distinct from
its subsidiaries. Because it has no other business operations, dividends from its operating
subsidiaries represent a significant source of funds for its obligations, including debt service.
The ability of our insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends is subject to limitation by state
insurance regulations. See our discussions under Regulation of Dividends and Other Payments from
Our Operating Subsidiaries in Part I, and in Note 15 of our Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements in our December 31, 2007 Form 10K for additional information regarding the ordinary
dividends that can be paid by our insurance subsidiaries in 2008. At June 30, 2008 we held cash and
investments of approximately $124 million outside of our insurance subsidiaries that are available
for use without regulatory approval. Additionally, in early August, 2008 we received dividends of
$125 million from and also contributed capital of $25 million to our insurance subsidiaries.
Cash Flows
The principal components of our operating cash flows are the excess of net investment income
and premiums collected over net losses paid and operating costs, including income taxes. Timing
delays exist between the collection of premiums and the ultimate payment of losses. Premiums are
generally collected within the twelve-month period after the policy is written while our claim
payments are generally paid over a more extended period of time. Likewise, timing delays exist
between the payment of claims and the collection of reinsurance recoveries. Our operating
activities provided positive cash flows of approximately $99.0 million and $94.7 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Operating cash flows during the first half of 2008 increased as compared to the same period in
2007 principally due to lower loss payments, net of reinsurance received (including $24 million
received related to the commutation of a group of prior year contracts). Additionally, cash inflows
were affected by lower premium receipts as a result of declines in gross premiums written,
increased premium payments to our reinsurers for adjustments related to losses recovered under the
contract in the preceding year, and higher income tax payments (attributable to an increase in
taxable income in the fourth quarter of 2007 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2006).
Two metrics commonly used to analyze the operating cash flows of insurance companies are the
paid-to-incurred ratio and the paid loss ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Paid-to-incurred ratio |
|
|
100.2 |
% |
|
|
109.8 |
% |
|
|
104.8 |
% |
|
|
92.8 |
% |
Paid loss ratio |
|
|
56.8 |
% |
|
|
81.8 |
% |
|
|
65.3 |
% |
|
|
68.1 |
% |
The paid-to-incurred ratio is calculated as net paid losses divided by net incurred losses.
The paid loss ratio is calculated as net paid losses divided by net premiums earned. In calculating
both of these ratios, net paid losses is defined as losses and loss adjustment expenses paid during
the period, net of the anticipated reinsurance recoveries related to those losses.
For a long-tailed business such as ProAssurance, fluctuations in the ratios over short periods
of time are not unexpected and are not necessarily indicative of either positive or negative
changes in loss experience. The timing of our indemnity payments is affected by many factors,
including the nature and number of the claims in process during any one period and the speed at
which cases work through the trial and appellate process. The ratios are affected not only by
variations in net paid losses, but also by variations in premium volume and the recognition of
reserve development.
The paid loss ratio and paid-to-incurred ratio declined in the second quarter 2008 as compared
to 2007 because of lower net paid losses, including the effect of a reinsurance commutation of $24
million. The decrease in net paid losses more than offset the effects of lower ratio denominators
(net earned premiums for the paid loss ratio; net incurred losses for the paid-to-incurred ratio).
24
Net earned
premiums and net incurred losses both reflect reductions in insured risks in 2008 as compared to 2007;
net incurred losses also reflect a greater amount of prior year favorable net loss development in
2008 than 2007.
The reduction in net paid losses was much less pronounced on a year-to-date basis, and thus
had a smaller effect on both ratios for the six-month period. In the case of the paid-to-incurred
ratio, the decrease to the ratio caused by lower net paid losses did not completely offset the
increase to the ratio that resulted from lower net incurred losses.
Losses paid in 2008 have not, as a whole, exceeded amounts reserved for those losses as of
December 31, 2007, nor has the payment of losses accelerated in an unexpected manner. In the
contractual obligations table included in Part II of our December 31, 2007 Form 10K we projected,
largely based on historical payment patterns, that we would pay gross losses of $541 million during
2008 related to the reserves that were established at December 31, 2007. Through June 30, 2008, our
gross loss payments total approximately $221 million, which, when annualized, is consistent with
the amount estimated for purposes of the table.
Investments
We manage our investments to ensure that we will have sufficient liquidity to meet our
obligations, taking into consideration the timing of cash flows from our investments, including
interest payments, dividends and principal payments, as well as the expected cash flows to be
generated by our operations. Typically, between $50 million and $75 million of our investments
mature or are paid down in a given quarter and are available, if needed, to meet our cash flow
requirements. At our insurance subsidiaries level, the primary outflow of cash is related to net
paid losses and operating costs, including income taxes. The payment of individual claims cannot be
predicted with certainty; therefore, we rely upon the history of paid claims in estimating the
timing of future claims payments. To the extent that we have an unanticipated shortfall in cash we
may either liquidate securities or borrow funds under previously established borrowing
arrangements. However, given the relatively short duration of our investments, we do not foresee
any such shortfall.
We held cash and short-term securities of $315.6 million at June 30, 2008 as compared to
$260.1 million at December 31, 2007. We are holding additional funds in our short-term portfolio as
a means of increasing our flexibility in a volatile investment market.
Our investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries increased to $47.5 million at June 30, 2008 as
compared to $26.8 million at December 31, 2007. Late in the first quarter of 2008 we increased our
investment in one of our unconsolidated subsidiaries by $20 million in order to take advantage of
dislocations in the credit market.
As of June 30, 2008 our available-for-sale fixed maturity securities of $3.2 billion comprise
86% of our total investments. Substantially all of our fixed maturities are either United States
government agency obligations or investment grade securities as determined by national rating
agencies. Our available-for-sale fixed maturities have a dollar weighted average rating of AA at
June 30, 2008. The weighted average effective duration of our fixed maturity securities at June 30,
2008 is 4.3 years; the weighted average effective duration of our fixed maturity securities and our
short-term securities combined is 3.9 years.
Fair values of our fixed maturity securities decreased by approximately $36 million during the
first half of 2008 primarily because of increases in market interest rates. Treasury yields at June
30, 2008 remained relatively flat as compared to December 31, 2007. However, because spreads
widened, our portfolio market yields increased, which reduced the fair value of our securities.
Changes in market interest rate levels generally affect our net income to the extent that
reinvestment yields are different than the yields on maturing securities. Changes in market
interest rates also affect the fair value of our fixed maturity securities. On a pre-tax basis, net
unrealized gains (losses) on our available-for-sale fixed maturity securities are comprised as
follows:
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
$ |
37.2 |
|
Gross unrealized (losses) |
|
|
(42.6 |
) |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(16.5 |
) |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 94% of the unrealized loss positions in our portfolio are interest-rate and
spread related. We have the intent, and, due to the duration of our overall portfolio and positive
cash flows, believe we have the ability to hold these bonds to recovery of book value or maturity
and do not consider the declines in value to be other-than-temporary. For a discussion of the
potential effects that future changes in interest rates may have on our investment portfolio see
Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
As of June 30, 2008, our fixed maturity securities include securities with a fair value of
approximately $15.5 million (adjusted cost basis of the securities is approximately $17.5 million)
that are supported by collateral we classify as sub-prime, of which approximately 62% are AAA
rated, 26% are AA, 10% are A and 2% are BBB. Additionally, we have approximately $2.6 million
(adjusted cost basis of the securities is approximately $7.5 million) of securities exposure to
below investment grade fixed income securities with sub-prime exposure within a high-yield
investment fund; the average rating of the securities is BB+. During the first half of 2008 we
evaluated our exposure to the sub-prime market and determined that $452,000 of write downs were
warranted for other-than-temporary impairments.
Subsequent to June 30, 2008 the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Freddie Mac), both Government Sponsored Entities (GSEs), have been
subject to significant market disruptions and regulatory discussions which have caused declines in
related securities. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or guarantee about half of the mortgages in the
United States. We have direct exposure to these GSEs in our fixed income portfolio of approximately
$104 million in senior debt and indirect exposure of $492 million through mortgage-backed
securities guaranteed by these agencies. We also hold approximately $9 million of preferred stocks
and $123,000 of common stocks of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Based upon our analysis of these
securities and the implicit and explicit support the GSEs are receiving from the Federal Government
we continue to view these securities as an appropriate asset class. Whether or not the government
will inject capital to boost the financial strength of these GSEs and whether that capital will
rank equally to current preferred stocks is still uncertain and may impact the value of our
preferred and common stocks in the future. We will continue to monitor the value of the securities
we hold as related market events unfold as part of our ongoing other-than-temporary impairment
process.
Speculation has also been made with regard to financial institutions, as a whole, and their
financial strength in light of the recent credit crisis. As of June 30, 2008 we hold fixed income
securities of financial institutions that have a fair value of approximately $350 million (adjusted
cost basis of the securities is approximately $359 million). The average rating of these securities
is between AA- and A and the duration is approximately 2.8 years. Our largest fixed income
exposures are to Lehman Brothers totaling $23.8 million and Morgan Stanley totaling $21.3 million.
These securities are experiencing price and rating volatility. We have reviewed the individual
securities and do not believe any of our holdings warrant a write down for other-than-temporary
impairment.
Equity investments represent less than 1% of our total investments and less than 3% of our
stockholders equity at both June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. At June 30, 2008, the carrying
value of our equity investments (including equities in our available-for-sale and trading
portfolios) totaled $32.1 million as compared to $29.6 million at December 31, 2007.
26
Reinsurance
At June 30, 2008 our reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses is $281.1 million. Our
receivable from reinsurers on paid losses, which is classified as a part of other assets, is $23.7
million.
We use reinsurance to provide capacity to write larger limits of liability, to provide
protection against losses in excess of policy limits, and to stabilize underwriting results in
years in which higher losses occur. The purchase of reinsurance does not relieve us from the
ultimate risk on our policies, but it does provide reimbursement from the reinsurer for certain
losses paid by us.
Our risk retention level is dependent upon numerous factors including our risk appetite and
the capital we have to support it, the price and availability of reinsurance, volume of business,
level of experience and our analysis of the potential underwriting results within each state. We
purchase reinsurance from a number of companies to mitigate concentrations of credit risk. Our
reinsurance broker assists us in the analysis of the credit quality of our reinsurers. We base our
reinsurance buying decisions on an evaluation of the then-current financial strength, rating and
stability of prospective reinsurers. However, the financial strength of our reinsurers, and their
corresponding ability to pay us, may change in the future due to forces or events we cannot control
or anticipate.
Periodically, reinsurers may dispute our claim for reimbursement from them; however, we have
not experienced significant collection difficulties due to the financial condition of the
reinsurer. We have established appropriate reserves for any balances that we believe may not be
ultimately collected. Should future events lead us to believe that any reinsurer will not meet its
obligations to us, adjustments to the amounts recoverable would be reflected in the results of
current operations. Such an adjustment has the potential to be significant to the results of
operations in the period in which it is recorded; however, we would not expect such an adjustment
to have a material effect on our capital position or our liquidity.
Debt
Our long-term debt at June 30, 2008 is comprised of the following.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
First |
(In thousands, except %) |
|
Rate |
|
2008 |
|
|
Redemption Date |
|
|
|
Convertible Debentures |
|
3.9%, fixed
|
|
$ |
106,121 |
|
|
Converted July 2008 (see below) |
2034 Subordinated Debentures |
|
6.5%, Libor adjusted
|
|
|
46,395 |
|
|
May 2009 |
2034 Surplus Notes |
|
7.7%, fixed until May 2009
|
|
|
11,864 |
|
|
May 2009* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
164,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Subject to approval by the Wisconsin Commissioner of Insurance |
A detailed description of our debt is provided in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
As discussed in Notes 7 and 11, on June 2, 2008 we notified holders of our Convertible
Debentures of our intent to redeem all of the outstanding debentures on July 7, 2008; prior to
redemption all holders requested conversion. On July 2, 2008 all outstanding Convertible Debentures
were converted into 2.57 million shares of our common stock; comprised of approximately 2.12
million reissued treasury shares and 450,000 newly issued common shares. The transaction will
result in a net increase to Stockholders Equity of approximately $112 million in the third quarter
of 2008. No gain or loss will be recorded related to the conversion. Because the dilutive effect of
the debentures has been included in our calculation of fully diluted earnings per share, the
conversion of the debentures has no impact on this measurement. However, the conversion will result
in an increase in book value per share of approximately $0.28.
27
Treasury Stock
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 we repurchased 1.2 million shares of our common
stock at a total cost of $63.0 million. At June 30, 2008 approximately $17.3 million of our Boards
authorization for the repurchase of common shares or debt securities remained available for use. As
previously discussed, approximately 2.1 million shares of treasury shares were reissued in July
2008 as a part of the conversion of our Convertible Debentures.
In July 2008 we repurchased approximately 360,000 common shares which exhausted our existing
Board authorization. On August 5, 2008 our Board authorized, effective immediately, an additional
$100 million for the repurchase of common shares or retire
outstanding debt.
Litigation
We are involved in various legal actions arising primarily from claims against us related to
insurance policies and claims handling, including, but not limited to, claims asserted by our
policyholders. Legal actions are generally divided into two categories: (1) Legal actions dealing
with claims and claim-related activities which we consider in our evaluation of our reserve for
losses, and (2) legal actions falling outside of these areas which we evaluate and reserve for
separately as a part of our Other Liabilities.
Claim-related actions are considered as a part of our reserving process under the guidance
provided by SFAS 60 Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. We evaluate the likely
outcomes from these actions giving consideration to the facts and laws applicable to each case,
appellate issues, coverage issues, potential recoveries from our insurance and reinsurance
programs, and settlement discussions as well as our historical claims resolution practices. This
data is then given consideration in the overall evaluation of our reserve for losses.
For non-claim-related actions we evaluate each case separately and establish what we believe
is an appropriate reserve under the guidance provided by SFAS 5 Accounting for Contingencies. As a
result of the acquisition of NCRIC in 2005, ProAssurance assumed the risk of loss for a judgment
entered against NCRIC on February 20, 2004 by a District of Columbia Superior Court in favor of
Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc. (CHW) in the amount of $18.2 million (the CHW
judgment). The CHW judgment is on appeal to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. ProAssurance
has established a liability for this judgment of $22.1 million, which includes the estimated costs
associated with pursuing appellate relief and projected post-trial interest, $19.5 million of which
was established as a component of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the
allocation of the NCRIC purchase price.
There are risks, as outlined in our Risk Factors in Part 1 of our 10K, that individual actions
could cost us more than our estimates. In particular, we or our insureds may receive adverse
verdicts; post-trial motions may be denied, in whole or in part; any appeals that may be undertaken
may be unsuccessful; we may be unsuccessful in our legal efforts to limit the scope of coverage
available to insureds; and we may become a party to bad faith litigation over the settlement of a
claim. To the extent that the cost of resolving these actions exceeds our estimates, the legal
actions could have a material effect on ProAssurances results of operations in the period in which
any such action is resolved.
28
Overview of ResultsThree and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Net income totaled $43.3 million and $79.2 million for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 as compared to $37.6 million and $73.7 million, respectively, for the same periods in
2007. Net income per diluted share was $1.27 and $2.31 for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, as compared to $1.06 and $2.08 for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The increase in net income earnings per share is attributable to
both the increase in net income and treasury shares purchased during the twelve months preceding
June 30, 2008, which reduced our weighted average shares outstanding as compared to 2007.
Our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compare to the same respective
periods in 2007 as follows:
Revenues
Net premiums earned declined in 2008 by approximately $16.9 million (13%) for the three- month
period and $33.5 million (12%) for the six-month period. The declines reflect the effects of a
highly competitive market place and rate reductions.
Our net investment result, which includes both net investment income and earnings from
unconsolidated subsidiaries, declined in 2008 by $4.2 million (9.2%) for the three-month period and
$8.5 million (9.6%) for the six-month period. The decline primarily reflects lower interest rates
during 2008 and unfavorable conditions in the bond market.
We recognized net investment losses during both the three- and six-month periods of 2008,
primarily due to the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments which increased $5.5 million
and $2.1 million for the quarter and year-to-date periods as compared to 2007.
Expenses
Net losses decreased in 2008 as compared to 2007 by $33.1 million for the three months and by
$50.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to a decline in insured risks and
increased recognition of favorable prior year loss development of $11.3 million for the second
quarter and $15.7 million for the first half of 2008. Underwriting, acquisition and insurance
expenses declined by approximately $500,000 and $1.1 million for the comparative three- and
six-month periods, respectively. Interest expense declined by $700,000 for the three months and by
$1.2 million for the six months.
Ratios
Our net loss ratio decreased in 2008 by 17.8 points for the three-month period and 11.0 points
for the six-month period as a result of the recognition of favorable net loss development as
discussed above. Our expense ratio increased by 2.4 points for the three months and 2.3 points for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily as a result of flat operating expenses and the decline
in premium. Our operating ratio decreased by 17.5 points for the three months and 11.3 points for
the six months. Return on equity (annualized) increased by 0.7 points to 13.7% for the three months
and decreased by 0.4 points to 12.6% for the six-month period.
29
Results of Operations-Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Selected consolidated financial data for each period is summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands, except share data) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
88,005 |
|
|
$ |
105,747 |
|
|
$ |
(17,742 |
) |
|
$ |
248,272 |
|
|
$ |
291,049 |
|
|
$ |
(42,777 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
78,784 |
|
|
$ |
90,867 |
|
|
$ |
(12,083 |
) |
|
$ |
227,199 |
|
|
$ |
262,326 |
|
|
$ |
(35,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
126,407 |
|
|
$ |
148,622 |
|
|
$ |
(22,215 |
) |
|
$ |
258,425 |
|
|
$ |
299,306 |
|
|
$ |
(40,881 |
) |
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(10,639 |
) |
|
|
(15,959 |
) |
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
(22,080 |
) |
|
|
(29,466 |
) |
|
|
7,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
115,768 |
|
|
|
132,663 |
|
|
|
(16,895 |
) |
|
|
236,345 |
|
|
|
269,840 |
|
|
|
(33,495 |
) |
Net investment income |
|
|
41,313 |
|
|
|
44,548 |
|
|
|
(3,235 |
) |
|
|
82,372 |
|
|
|
87,119 |
|
|
|
(4,747 |
) |
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
(966 |
) |
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
(3,780 |
) |
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
|
(5,349 |
) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(5,626 |
) |
|
|
(6,775 |
) |
|
|
(2,885 |
) |
|
|
(3,890 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
153,066 |
|
|
|
180,134 |
|
|
|
(27,068 |
) |
|
|
312,692 |
|
|
|
359,012 |
|
|
|
(46,320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
77,715 |
|
|
|
110,050 |
|
|
|
(32,335 |
) |
|
|
168,294 |
|
|
|
239,651 |
|
|
|
(71,357 |
) |
Reinsurance recoveries |
|
|
(12,044 |
) |
|
|
(11,257 |
) |
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
(20,940 |
) |
|
|
(41,811 |
) |
|
|
20,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment
expenses |
|
|
65,671 |
|
|
|
98,793 |
|
|
|
(33,122 |
) |
|
|
147,354 |
|
|
|
197,840 |
|
|
|
(50,486 |
) |
Underwriting, acquisition and
insurance expenses |
|
|
25,157 |
|
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
(491 |
) |
|
|
51,399 |
|
|
|
52,475 |
|
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
2,984 |
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
4,714 |
|
|
|
5,944 |
|
|
|
(1,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
93,120 |
|
|
|
127,425 |
|
|
|
(34,305 |
) |
|
|
203,467 |
|
|
|
256,259 |
|
|
|
(52,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
59,946 |
|
|
|
52,709 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
109,225 |
|
|
|
102,753 |
|
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
16,628 |
|
|
|
15,088 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
30,039 |
|
|
|
29,042 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
43,318 |
|
|
$ |
37,621 |
|
|
$ |
5,697 |
|
|
$ |
79,186 |
|
|
$ |
73,711 |
|
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss ratio |
|
|
56.7 |
% |
|
|
74.5 |
% |
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
62.3 |
% |
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
Underwriting expense ratio |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
78.4 |
% |
|
|
93.8 |
% |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
92.7 |
% |
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating ratio |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
49.1 |
% |
|
|
60.4 |
% |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Return on equity* |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
30
Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
88,005 |
|
|
$ |
105,747 |
|
|
$ |
(17,742 |
) |
|
|
(16.8 |
%) |
|
$ |
248,272 |
|
|
$ |
291,049 |
|
|
$ |
(42,777 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
126,407 |
|
|
$ |
148,622 |
|
|
$ |
(22,215 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
%) |
|
$ |
258,425 |
|
|
$ |
299,306 |
|
|
$ |
(40,881 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(10,639 |
) |
|
|
(15,959 |
) |
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
(33.3 |
%) |
|
|
(22,080 |
) |
|
|
(29,466 |
) |
|
|
7,386 |
|
|
|
(25.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
115,768 |
|
|
$ |
132,663 |
|
|
$ |
(16,895 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
%) |
|
$ |
236,345 |
|
|
$ |
269,840 |
|
|
$ |
(33,495 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Premiums Written
Gross premiums written declined during both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007, reflecting the effects of lower premium rates and a
very competitive market. During 2007 we began to see the impact of improving loss trends in our
rate making analysis and as a result have lowered rates where indicated; as policies take effect at
these lower rates our premiums written have declined. While such rate reductions do result in lower
premiums, they have allowed us to maintain a favorable retention rate and we continue to price our
business at what we believe to be profitable levels. We continue to face price-based competition in
virtually all of our markets which makes the acquisition of new business challenging. While we
persist in seeking new business opportunities, we are unwilling to provide coverage at rates that
we do not believe to be profitable. We continue to believe that inadequate pricing risks erosion of
reserves, deterioration of underwriting results and failure to achieve returns for our
shareholders.
Physician premiums represent 78% and 80% of gross premiums written for the three months and
84% and 86% of gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Physician premiums decreased by 19% for the comparative three-month periods and by
16% for the comparative six-month periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Physician Premiums* |
|
$ |
69,002 |
|
|
$ |
84,885 |
|
|
$ |
(15,883 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
%) |
|
$ |
208,734 |
|
|
$ |
249,255 |
|
|
$ |
(40,521 |
) |
|
|
(16.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Exclusive of tail premiums as discussed below |
Our overall retention rate (without adjustment to eliminate retirees or any risks sought to be
renewed by us) based on the number of physician risks that renew with us, is approximately 85% and
88% for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, as compared to 85% for
both the three- and the six-month periods ended June 30, 2007. On our renewed business, our charged
rates reflect average decreases of 7% and 6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
respectively. Charged rates include the effects of filed rates, surcharges and discounts.
Premiums written for non-physician coverages represent 16% and 14% of our total gross premiums
written for the three months and 11% and 10% of our total gross premiums written for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-physician Premiums* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospital and facility |
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
$ |
8,857 |
|
|
$ |
(450 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
%) |
|
$ |
15,547 |
|
|
$ |
16,956 |
|
|
$ |
(1,409 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
%) |
Other non-physician |
|
|
5,732 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
%) |
|
|
12,583 |
|
|
|
13,174 |
|
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,139 |
|
|
$ |
14,676 |
|
|
$ |
(537 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
%) |
|
$ |
28,130 |
|
|
$ |
30,130 |
|
|
$ |
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exclusive of tail premiums as discussed below |
Hospital and facility coverages are the most significant component of non-physician premiums
and represent 10% and 8% of our total gross premiums written during the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and represent 6% of our total gross premiums written during
each of the six-month periods in 2008 and 2007. Other non-physician coverages consist primarily of
professional liability coverages provided to lawyers and to other health care professionals such as
dentists and nurses. We are seeing the same competitive pressures in these areas as we are seeing
in our physician business.
31
We are required to offer extended reporting endorsement or tail policies to insureds that
are discontinuing their claims-made coverage with us, but we do not market such coverages
separately. The amount of tail premium written and earned can vary widely from period to period.
Tail premiums totaled approximately $4.9 million and $11.4 million (6% and 5% of gross written
premiums) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, decreases of $1.3 million
and $0.3 million as compared to the same respective periods in 2007.
Premiums Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
126,407 |
|
|
$ |
148,622 |
|
|
$ |
(22,215 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
%) |
|
$ |
258,425 |
|
|
$ |
299,306 |
|
|
$ |
(40,881 |
) |
|
|
(13.7 |
%) |
Because premiums are generally earned pro rata over the entire policy period, fluctuations in
premiums earned tend to lag those of premiums written. Our policies generally carry a term of one
year. Tail premiums are 100% earned in the period written because the policies insure only
incidents that occurred in prior periods and are not cancellable.
Exclusive of the effect of tail premiums, the decline in premiums earned for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 reflects declines in gross
premiums written during 2007 and 2008, as well as a decline of $3.8 million for the three months
and $10.0 million for the six months that is due to premium earned in 2007 related to unearned
premiums acquired in the merger with PIC Wisconsin.
During the twelve months preceding June 30, 2008, our written premiums have declined as
compared to written premiums for the twelve months preceding June 30, 2007. Consequently, 2008
earned premiums are expected to continue to be lower than 2007 earned premiums.
Premiums Ceded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums ceded |
|
$ |
10,639 |
|
|
$ |
15,959 |
|
|
$ |
(5,320 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
%) |
|
$ |
22,080 |
|
|
$ |
29,466 |
|
|
$ |
(7,386 |
) |
|
|
(25.1 |
%) |
Premiums ceded represent the portion of earned premiums that we pay our reinsurers for their
assumption of a portion of our losses. The premium that we cede to our reinsurers is determined, in
part, by the loss experience (subject to minimums and maximums) of the business ceded to them. It
takes a number of years before all losses are known, and in the intervening period, premiums due to
the reinsurers are estimated.
Our reinsurance expense ratio (ceded premiums as a percentage of premiums earned) is 8.4% for
the three months and 8.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to a 9% ratio
(adjusted to exclude an increase in ceded premiums of $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2007 to
reflect the impact of increases in our projection of ceded losses for prior year agreements) for
both the three- and six-month periods of 2007. The decrease in the ratio in 2008 is primarily
because proportionally more of the 2008 premium decline resulted from ceded business rather than
from retained business. Also, in 2007 a portion of PIC Wisconsin premiums were earned under
pre-acquisition reinsurance arrangements; those arrangements ceded a greater portion of all premium
to reinsurers than do the post-acquisition reinsurance arrangements.
32
Net Investment Income, Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses); Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
41,313 |
|
|
$ |
44,548 |
|
|
$ |
(3,235 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
%) |
|
$ |
82,372 |
|
|
$ |
87,119 |
|
|
$ |
(4,747 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
%) |
Net investment income is primarily derived from the income earned by our fixed maturity
securities and also includes income from short-term, trading portfolio and cash equivalent
investments, dividend income from equity securities, earnings from other investments and increases
in the cash surrender value of business owned executive life insurance contracts. Investment fees
and expenses are deducted from investment income.
Net investment income by investment category is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities |
|
$ |
39,112 |
|
|
$ |
37,861 |
|
|
$ |
77,865 |
|
|
$ |
74,179 |
|
Equities |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1,617 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
3,945 |
|
|
|
7,709 |
|
Other invested assets |
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
6,140 |
|
Business owned life insurance |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
Investment expenses |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
(1,077 |
) |
|
|
(2,351 |
) |
|
|
(2,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
|
$ |
41,313 |
|
|
$ |
44,548 |
|
|
$ |
82,372 |
|
|
$ |
87,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in net investment income from fixed maturities for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods in 2007 reflects both higher average invested funds
and slightly improved yields. Our average invested funds have increased as a result of the
investment of cash flows from our insurance operations. Market interest rates during 2007 and 2008
allowed us to consistently invest new and matured funds at rates that exceed the average held in
our portfolio, which improved our yields in 2008 as compared to 2007. Average yields for our
available-for-sale fixed maturity securities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average income yield |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Average tax equivalent income yield |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
The decline in investment income from short term investments during 2008 as compared to 2007
reflects lower market interest rates, on average 280 basis points, for these types of securities in
2008.
Income from other invested assets is principally derived from private investment funds
accounted for on a cost basis. Because we recognize the income related to these funds as it is
distributed to us, our income from these holdings can vary significantly from period to period. In
particular, the company has an investment in a distressed debt fund that has reduced its quarterly
distributions given the turmoil in the debt markets.
33
Equity in Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings (loss) of
unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
964 |
|
|
$ |
(966 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,949 |
) |
|
$ |
1,831 |
|
|
$ |
(3,780 |
) |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated subsidiaries is derived from our ownership
interests in three private investment funds accounted for on the equity basis. Year-to-date
performance of the three funds reflected the decline and volatility of equity and credit markets in
2008. During the quarter, the negative return from our investment in a high-yield asset backed
securities fund was largely offset by a positive return in a long/short equity fund. The third fund
is an early phase private equity fund of funds that is still incurring the costs associated with
its startup phase.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses)
The components of net realized investment gains (losses) are shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) from sales |
|
$ |
(171 |
) |
|
$ |
1,214 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
1,474 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment (losses) |
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,307 |
) |
|
|
(4,174 |
) |
Trading portfolio gains (losses) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
|
(614 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(5,349 |
) |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
(6,775 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,885 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2008 we recognized other-than-temporary impairment losses of $5.5
million, which included $4.7 million related to asset backed bonds, $433,000 related to corporate
bonds and $271,000 related to our equity holdings. During the first quarter of 2008 we recognized
impairment losses of $857,000 including impairments of $396,000 related to asset backed bonds,
$80,000 related to a corporate bond, $353,000 related to a passive investment that we hold in a
private investment fund and $28,000 related to an equity position that was sold shortly after the
end of the first quarter. Other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in 2007 related to high
yield asset backed bonds, particularly those with sub-prime loan exposures.
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
The determination of calendar year losses involves the actuarial evaluation of incurred losses
for the current accident year and the actuarial re-evaluation of incurred losses for prior accident
years, including an evaluation of the reserve amounts required for losses in excess of policy
limits.
Accident year refers to the accounting period in which the insured event becomes a liability
of the insurer. For occurrence policies the insured event becomes a liability when the event takes
place; for claims-made policies, which represent the majority of the Companys business, the
insured event generally becomes a liability when the event is first reported to the insurer. We
believe that measuring losses on an accident year basis is the most indicative measure of the
underlying profitability of the premiums earned in that period since it associates policy premiums
earned with the estimate of the losses incurred related to those policy premiums.
34
The following table summarizes calendar year net losses and net loss ratios for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 by separating losses between the current accident year and
all prior accident years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Losses |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
(In millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year |
|
$ |
97.0 |
|
|
$ |
118.8 |
|
|
$ |
(21.8 |
) |
|
$ |
198.7 |
|
|
$ |
233.4 |
|
|
$ |
(34.7 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(31.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(51.3 |
) |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year |
|
$ |
65.7 |
|
|
$ |
98.8 |
|
|
$ |
(33.1 |
) |
|
$ |
147.4 |
|
|
$ |
197.8 |
|
|
$ |
(50.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss Ratios* |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accident year |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
|
89.5 |
% |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
84.0 |
% |
|
|
86.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
Prior accident years |
|
|
(27.0 |
%) |
|
|
(15.0 |
%) |
|
|
(12.0 |
) |
|
|
(21.7 |
%) |
|
|
(13.2 |
%) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year |
|
|
56.7 |
% |
|
|
74.5 |
% |
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
62.3 |
% |
|
|
73.3 |
% |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net losses as specified divided by net premiums earned. |
Our current accident year loss ratios for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
decreased as compared to 2007. In the second quarter of 2007 the Company increased its current
accident year loss reserves relating to excess of policy limit losses, which increased the current
accident year loss ratio by 3.8 and 1.9 percentage points for the quarter and year-to-date periods,
respectively. Excluding this item the current accident year loss ratios for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and the comparable period in 2007 vary only as a result of the mix of insured risks.
Based upon claims data, we have reduced our expectation of claims severity within our retained
layers of coverage. As a result, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 we recognized
favorable net loss development of $31.3 million and $51.3 million, respectively, generally related
to our previously established (prior accident year) reserves. In particular, we have observed
claims severity below our initial expectations, within the first $1 million of coverage, for the
2003 through 2006 accident years. Given both the long tailed nature of our business and the past
volatility of claims, we are generally cautious in recognizing the impact of the underlying trends
that lead to the recognition of favorable net loss development. As we conclude that sufficient data
with respect to these trends exists to credibly impact our actuarial analysis we take appropriate
actions. In the case of the claims severity trends for 2003-2006, we believe it is appropriate to
recognize the impact of these trends in our actuarial evaluation of prior period loss estimates
while also remaining cautious about the past volatility of claims severity. Favorable net loss
development also includes $3.7 million recognized in the second quarter of 2008 related to prior
year reinsurance contracts that were commuted during the period.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 we recognized favorable net loss
development of $20.0 million and $35.6 million, respectively, related to our previously established
(prior accident year) reserves, primarily to reflect reductions in our estimates of claim severity,
within our retained layer of risk, for the 2003 through 2005 accident years.
Assumptions used in establishing our reserve are regularly reviewed and updated by management
as new data becomes available. Any adjustments necessary are reflected in then current operations.
Due to the size of our reserve, even a small percentage adjustment to the assumptions can have a
material effect on our results of operations for the period in which the change is made.
35
Underwriting, Acquisition and Insurance Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
($ in thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting,
acquisition and
insurance expenses |
|
$ |
25,157 |
|
|
$ |
25,648 |
|
|
$ |
(491 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
%) |
|
$ |
51,399 |
|
|
$ |
52,475 |
|
|
$ |
(1,076 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting expense ratio |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
|
The increase in the underwriting expense ratio (expense ratio) for both the three- and
six-month periods is the result of modestly higher fixed costs associated with our insurance
operations and the reduction in net earned premiums. Offsetting the higher operating expenses are
lower underwriting and acquisition expenses, which are down in proportion to the decline in net
earned premium.
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses include stock-based compensation expense of
approximately $2.1 million for the three months and $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2008, as compared to $1.5 million and $3.7 million for the same periods in 2007, respectively.
Stock-based compensation expense of $680,000 and $1.2 million for the six-month periods ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, relates to awards given to employees who are eligible for
retirement. Awards issued to retirement eligible employees are expensed when granted rather than
over the vesting period of the award.
In certain states the Company is permitted to recoup previous guarantee fund assessments
through surcharges collected from our insureds. Total net guaranty fund recoupments of
approximately $270,000 and $639,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively,
include recoupment of approximately $304,000 and $648,000, respectively, primarily related to
assessments previously paid to the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. Net guaranty fund
recoupments totaled approximately $90,000 and $134,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, and include benefits of approximately $96,000 and $154,000, respectively, related to amounts
recouped from our insureds.
36
Interest Expense
The decrease in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 as compared
to the same periods in 2007 is primarily due to the redemption of our 2032 Subordinated Debentures
in December 2007. Also, our 2034 Subordinated Debentures variable interest rates (based on LIBOR)
were approximately 250 basis points lower for the three-month period and approximately 200 basis
points lower for the six-month period of 2008.
Interest expense by debt obligation is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Debentures |
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
2032 Subordinated Debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
(787 |
) |
2034 Subordinated Debentures |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
Surplus Notes |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,292 |
|
|
$ |
2,984 |
|
|
$ |
(692 |
) |
|
$ |
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
5,944 |
|
|
$ |
(1,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed in Notes 7 and 11, our Convertible Debentures were converted into common shares
on July 2, 2008 which will reduce interest expense for the remainder of 2008.
Taxes
Our effective tax rate for each period is significantly lower than the 35% statutory rate
because a considerable portion of our net investment income is tax-exempt. The effect of tax-exempt
income on our effective tax rate is shown in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Tax-exempt income |
|
|
(7.6 |
%) |
|
|
(7.3 |
%) |
|
|
(8.1 |
%) |
|
|
(7.3 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
37
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk related to our
investment operations. These risks are interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Our fixed maturities portfolio is exposed to interest rate risk. Fluctuations in interest
rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of these securities. As interest rates rise,
market values of fixed income portfolios fall and vice versa. Certain of the securities are held in
an unrealized loss position; we have the current ability and intent to hold such securities until
recovery of book value or maturity.
The following table summarizes estimated changes in the fair value of our available-for-sale
and trading fixed maturity securities for specific hypothetical changes in interest rates as of
June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except duration) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Change in |
|
Effective |
|
Portfolio |
|
Effective |
Interest
Rates |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Duration |
|
Value |
|
Duration |
|
200 basis point rise |
|
$ |
2,891 |
|
|
$ |
(282 |
) |
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
$ |
2,953 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
|
100 basis point rise |
|
$ |
3,030 |
|
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
$ |
3,095 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
Current rate * |
|
$ |
3,173 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
|
$ |
3,237 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
100 basis point decline |
|
$ |
3,309 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
$ |
3,366 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
|
200 basis point decline |
|
$ |
3,435 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Current rates are as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. |
At June 30, 2008, the fair value of our investment in preferred stocks was $10.1 million,
including net unrealized losses of $1.0 million. Preferred stocks are primarily subject to interest
rate risk because they bear a fixed rate of return. The investments in the above table do not
include preferred stocks.
Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including the maintenance of the existing level and composition of fixed
income security assets, and should not be relied on as indicative of future results.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the computation of
the fair value of fixed rate instruments. Actual values may differ from those projections presented
should market conditions vary from assumptions used in the calculation of the fair value of
individual securities, including non-parallel shifts in the term structure of interest rates and
changing individual issuer credit spreads.
ProAssurances cash and short-term investment portfolio at June 30, 2008 was on a cost basis
which approximated its fair value. This portfolio lacks significant interest rate sensitivity due
to its short duration.
Credit Risk
We have exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of fixed income securities. We control
this exposure by emphasizing investment grade credit quality in the fixed income securities we
purchase.
As of June 30, 2008, 97.8% of our fixed maturity securities are rated investment grade as
determined by Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs), (e.g. Moodys,
Standard & Poors and Fitch). We believe that this concentration in investment grade securities
reduces our exposure to credit risk on our fixed income investments to an acceptable level.
However, investment grade securities, in spite of their rating, can rapidly deteriorate and result
in significant losses. Ratings published by the NRSROs are one of the tools used to evaluate the
credit worthiness of our securities. The ratings reflect the subjective opinion of the rating
agencies as to the credit worthiness of the securities, and therefore, we may be subject to
additional credit exposure should the rating prove to be unreliable.
38
We hold $1.4 billion of municipal bonds. Municipal bonds may have improved credit ratings from
guarantees of the debt obligations by a monoline insurer. Approximately $888.6 million (64%) of our
municipal bonds are insured. As of June 30, 2008, our municipal bonds have a weighted average
rating of AA and a stand-alone rating, excluding benefits of insurance protection, of AA. As of
June 30, 2008, our fixed maturity securities include securities with a fair value of approximately
$15.5 million (adjusted cost basis of the securities is approximately $17.5 million) that are
supported by collateral we classify as sub-prime, of which approximately 62% are AAA rated, 26% are
AA, 10% are A and 2% are BBB. Additionally, we have approximately $2.6 million (adjusted cost basis
of the securities is approximately $7.5 million) of securities exposure to below investment grade
fixed income securities with sub-prime exposure within a high-yield investment fund; the average
rating of these securities is BB+. During the second quarter of 2008 we evaluated our exposure to
the sub-prime market and determined that $452,000 of write downs was warranted for
other-than-temporary impairments.
We have direct and indirect exposure to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other financial
institutions. We have direct exposure to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of approximately $104 million
in senior debt, $9 million of preferred stocks and $123,000 of common stocks and indirect exposure
of $492 million through mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by these agencies. We hold
approximately $350 million of fixed income securities directly related to other financial
institutions with an average rating between AA- and A. Our largest exposures are to Lehman Brothers
totaling $23.8 million and Morgan Stanley totaling $21.3 million. We have indirect exposure to JP
Morgan related to our business owned life insurance policies, of which $16 million is held in a
separate account with a stable value agreement guaranteed by JP Morgan. In light of the recent
credit crisis and market dislocations, these institutions have experienced market disruptions. The
value of theses securities or ultimate settlement of obligations is subject to the financial
performance of these entities. We have reviewed these securities and determined that
other-than-temporary impairment is not warranted as of June 30, 2008.
Equity Price Risk
At June 30, 2008 the fair value of our investment in common stocks was $22.1 million. These
securities are subject to equity price risk, which is defined as the potential for loss in fair
value due to a decline in equity prices. The weighted average Beta of this group of securities is
0.93. Beta measures the price sensitivity of an equity security or group of equity securities to a
change in the broader equity market, in this case the S&P 500 Index. If the value of the S&P 500
Index increased by 10%, the fair value of these securities would be expected to increase by 9.3% to
$24.1 million. Conversely, a 10% decrease in the S&P 500 Index would imply a decrease of 9.3% in
the fair value of these securities to $20.0 million. The selected hypothetical changes of plus or
minus 10% do not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios and are used for
illustrative purposes only.
39
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company participated in
managements evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rule
13a-15(e)) as of June 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, those controls during the
quarter.
40
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 9 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are no changes to the Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A of the 2007 Form 10K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Items 2(a) and (b) are inapplicable.
(c) Information required by Item 703 of Regulation S-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average |
|
of Publicly |
|
Purchased Under |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price Paid |
|
Announced Plans or |
|
the Plans or |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
per Share |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
April 1, 2008 - April 30, 2008 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
52.02 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
56,743,370 |
|
May 1, 2008 - May 31, 2008 |
|
|
241,162 |
|
|
$ |
50.23 |
|
|
|
241,162 |
|
|
$ |
44,628,753 |
|
June 1, 2008 - June 30, 2008 |
|
|
544,527 |
|
|
$ |
50.11 |
|
|
|
544,527 |
|
|
$ |
17,343,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
788,689 |
|
|
$ |
50.15 |
|
|
|
788,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
(a) |
|
The Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of ProAssurance was held on May 21, 2008. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Item 4(b) is not applicable |
|
|
(c) |
|
At the meeting the shareholders of ProAssurance considered and acted upon the
following: |
|
(1) |
|
Elected directors to serve until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
Name |
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
Abstain |
|
Nonvotes |
|
Lucian F. Bloodworth |
|
|
18,482,181 |
|
|
|
9,083,169 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
8,918,205 |
|
A. Derrill Crowe, M.D. |
|
|
26,878,932 |
|
|
|
686,418 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
521,454 |
|
Robert E. Flowers,
M.D. |
|
|
27,399,661 |
|
|
|
165,689 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Ann F. Putallaz |
|
|
27,390,865 |
|
|
|
174,485 |
|
|
NA |
|
|
9,521 |
|
Drayton Nabers |
|
|
27,322,093 |
|
|
|
233,257 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
68,293 |
|
|
(2) |
|
Ratified the election of W. Stancil Starnes as a Class III director as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Nonvotes |
|
|
26,936,460 |
|
|
|
619,066 |
|
|
|
9,824 |
|
|
|
4,522,444 |
|
|
(3) |
|
Approved the ProAssurance Corporation 2008 Annual Incentive compensation as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Nonvotes |
|
|
23,221,217 |
|
|
|
834,077 |
|
|
|
16,114 |
|
|
|
8,016,386 |
|
|
(4) |
|
Approved the ProAssurance Corporation 2008 Equity Incentive Plan as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Nonvotes |
|
|
19,558,249 |
|
|
|
4,498,414 |
|
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
8,016,416 |
|
41
|
(5) |
|
Ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Nonvotes |
|
|
27,522,674 |
|
|
|
33,099 |
|
|
|
9,576 |
|
|
|
4,522,445 |
|
|
(d) |
|
Item 4(d) is not applicable |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer of ProAssurance as required under
SEC Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1350). |
42
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
August 6, 2008 |
PROASSURANCE CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward L. Rand, Jr.
|
|
|
Edward L. Rand, Jr. |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) |
|
|
43