FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-32938
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
98-0481737 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
27 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)
(441) 278-5400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of outstanding common shares, par value $0.03 per share, of Allied World Assurance
Company Holdings, Ltd as of August 4, 2008 was 48,978,591.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
maturity investments available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2008: $5,685,111; 2007: $5,595,943) |
|
$ |
5,733,523 |
|
|
$ |
5,707,143 |
|
Other invested assets available for sale, at fair value (cost: 2008: $81,241; 2007: $291,458) |
|
|
77,444 |
|
|
|
322,144 |
|
Other invested assets, at fair value |
|
|
192,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
6,003,628 |
|
|
|
6,029,287 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
439,933 |
|
|
|
202,582 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
84,492 |
|
|
|
67,886 |
|
Securities lending collateral |
|
|
190,960 |
|
|
|
147,241 |
|
Insurance balances receivable |
|
|
432,468 |
|
|
|
304,499 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance |
|
|
193,005 |
|
|
|
163,836 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
778,578 |
|
|
|
682,765 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
54,735 |
|
|
|
55,763 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
126,995 |
|
|
|
108,295 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
19,450 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
Balances receivable on sale of investments |
|
|
96,801 |
|
|
|
84,998 |
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
4,881 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
45,519 |
|
|
|
43,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,468,596 |
|
|
$ |
7,899,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
4,164,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,919,772 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
945,126 |
|
|
|
811,083 |
|
Unearned ceding commissions |
|
|
32,356 |
|
|
|
28,831 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
120,888 |
|
|
|
67,175 |
|
Securities lending payable |
|
|
190,960 |
|
|
|
147,241 |
|
Balances due on purchase of investments |
|
|
107,054 |
|
|
|
141,462 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
498,738 |
|
|
|
498,682 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
31,208 |
|
|
|
45,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
6,090,550 |
|
|
$ |
5,659,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, par value $0.03 per share, issued and outstanding 2008: 48,977,635 shares and
2007: 48,741,927 shares |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,298,375 |
|
|
|
1,281,832 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,039,154 |
|
|
|
820,334 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income: net
unrealized gains on investments, net of tax |
|
|
39,048 |
|
|
|
136,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,378,046 |
|
|
|
2,239,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
8,468,596 |
|
|
$ |
7,899,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-1-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
446,784 |
|
|
$ |
530,549 |
|
|
$ |
843,657 |
|
|
$ |
968,955 |
|
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(126,534 |
) |
|
|
(143,962 |
) |
|
|
(196,835 |
) |
|
|
(224,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
320,250 |
|
|
|
386,587 |
|
|
|
646,822 |
|
|
|
744,431 |
|
Change in unearned premiums |
|
|
(51,374 |
) |
|
|
(83,468 |
) |
|
|
(104,874 |
) |
|
|
(154,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
268,876 |
|
|
|
303,119 |
|
|
|
541,948 |
|
|
|
589,685 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
72,345 |
|
|
|
73,937 |
|
|
|
149,276 |
|
|
|
146,585 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
(4,393 |
) |
|
|
(1,481 |
) |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(7,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336,828 |
|
|
|
375,575 |
|
|
|
690,296 |
|
|
|
728,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
178,084 |
|
|
|
176,225 |
|
|
|
321,581 |
|
|
|
342,220 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
26,265 |
|
|
|
31,872 |
|
|
|
53,105 |
|
|
|
61,068 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
46,380 |
|
|
|
34,432 |
|
|
|
89,651 |
|
|
|
67,635 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,513 |
|
|
|
9,482 |
|
|
|
19,023 |
|
|
|
18,856 |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,843 |
|
|
|
252,543 |
|
|
|
483,437 |
|
|
|
490,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
76,985 |
|
|
|
123,032 |
|
|
|
206,859 |
|
|
|
237,962 |
|
Income tax (recovery) expense |
|
|
(2,220 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(3,291 |
) |
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
79,205 |
|
|
|
123,287 |
|
|
|
210,150 |
|
|
|
237,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investments
arising during the period net of
applicable deferred income tax
recovery for three months 2008: $493;
2007: $1,475; and six months
2008: $242; 2007: $2,292 |
|
|
(101,589 |
) |
|
|
(58,625 |
) |
|
|
(59,966 |
) |
|
|
(40,092 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for
net realized losses (gains)
included in net income |
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
(10,938 |
) |
|
|
7,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(96,577 |
) |
|
|
(57,144 |
) |
|
|
(70,904 |
) |
|
|
(32,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME |
|
$ |
(17,372 |
) |
|
$ |
66,143 |
|
|
$ |
139,246 |
|
|
$ |
205,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
4.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
$ |
4.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
48,897,931 |
|
|
|
60,397,591 |
|
|
|
48,585,015 |
|
|
|
60,028,523 |
|
Weighted average common shares and common
share equivalents outstanding |
|
|
50,873,712 |
|
|
|
62,874,235 |
|
|
|
51,013,633 |
|
|
|
62,277,010 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-2-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
$ |
1,281,832 |
|
|
$ |
136,214 |
|
|
$ |
820,334 |
|
|
$ |
2,239,842 |
|
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of FAS 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,262 |
) |
|
|
26,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210,150 |
|
|
|
210,150 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,592 |
) |
|
|
(17,592 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,904 |
) |
Stock compensation |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
16,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,298,375 |
|
|
$ |
39,048 |
|
|
$ |
1,039,154 |
|
|
$ |
2,378,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$ |
1,822,607 |
|
|
$ |
6,464 |
|
|
$ |
389,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,220,084 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,208 |
|
|
|
237,208 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,112 |
) |
|
|
(18,112 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,127 |
) |
Stock compensation |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
|
$ |
1,833,737 |
|
|
$ |
(25,663 |
) |
|
$ |
608,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,418,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-3-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
210,150 |
|
|
$ |
237,208 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains on sales of investments |
|
|
(48,215 |
) |
|
|
(4,358 |
) |
Impairment charges for other-than-temporary impairments on investments |
|
|
37,277 |
|
|
|
12,323 |
|
Change in fair value of hedge fund investments |
|
|
11,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premiums net of accrual of discounts on fixed maturities |
|
|
(3,787 |
) |
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
Amortization and depreciation of fixed assets |
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
3,992 |
|
Amortization of discount and expenses on senior notes |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
13,625 |
|
|
|
11,763 |
|
Insurance balances receivable |
|
|
(127,969 |
) |
|
|
(146,351 |
) |
Prepaid reinsurance |
|
|
(29,169 |
) |
|
|
(49,803 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
(95,813 |
) |
|
|
9,907 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
(5,243 |
) |
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
(18,700 |
) |
|
|
(31,042 |
) |
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(3,416 |
) |
|
|
(6,199 |
) |
Reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
|
244,448 |
|
|
|
106,683 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
134,043 |
|
|
|
204,550 |
|
Unearned ceding commissions |
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
11,698 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
53,713 |
|
|
|
40,132 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(13,812 |
) |
|
|
(5,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
376,628 |
|
|
|
389,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity investments |
|
|
(1,866,738 |
) |
|
|
(1,797,082 |
) |
Purchases of other invested assets |
|
|
(34,461 |
) |
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
Sales of fixed maturity investments |
|
|
1,738,412 |
|
|
|
1,203,750 |
|
Sales of other invested assets |
|
|
102,869 |
|
|
|
48,967 |
|
Net cash used for acquisition |
|
|
(44,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in securities lending collateral received |
|
|
(43,719 |
) |
|
|
(198,775 |
) |
Purchase of fixed assets |
|
|
(3,643 |
) |
|
|
(4,651 |
) |
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
(16,606 |
) |
|
|
86,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(167,938 |
) |
|
|
(666,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(17,592 |
) |
|
|
(18,112 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in securities lending collateral |
|
|
43,719 |
|
|
|
198,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
28,709 |
|
|
|
180,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency cash |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
237,351 |
|
|
|
(96,246 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
202,582 |
|
|
|
366,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
439,933 |
|
|
$ |
270,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
5,238 |
|
|
$ |
2,808 |
|
Cash paid for interest expense |
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
19,271 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in balance receivable on sale of investments |
|
|
(11,803 |
) |
|
|
(36,544 |
) |
Change in balance payable on purchase of investments |
|
|
(34,408 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-4-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
1. GENERAL
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd (Holdings) was incorporated in Bermuda on
November 13, 2001. Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company),
provides property and casualty insurance and reinsurance on a worldwide basis through operations in
Bermuda, the United States, Ireland and the United Kingdom.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND CONSOLIDATION
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings
and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with
Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments that are normal and recurring in nature and necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations as of the end of and for
the periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results for a full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. The significant estimates reflected in the Companys financial statements
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
The premium estimates for certain reinsurance agreements, |
|
|
|
|
Recoverability of deferred acquisition costs, |
|
|
|
|
The reserve for losses and loss expenses, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of ceded reinsurance recoverables, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of financial instruments, and |
|
|
|
|
Determination of other-than-temporary impairment of investments. |
Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation, and all entities
meeting consolidation requirements have been included in the consolidation. Certain immaterial
reclassifications in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows have been made
to the prior periods amounts to conform to the current periods presentation.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, including these notes, should be
read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financials statements, and related
notes thereto, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
3. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FAS 159). FAS 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity
to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities
differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This statement is expected
to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASBs long-term
measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. The fair value option will permit
all entities to choose to measure eligible items at
fair value at specified election dates. An entity shall record unrealized gains and losses on
items for which the fair value option has been elected through net income in the statement of
operations at each subsequent reporting date. The Company adopted FAS 159 as of January 1, 2008.
See Note 7 Fair Value of Financial Instruments regarding the Companys adoption of FAS 159.
-5-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This
statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. The Company adopted FAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. See Note 7 Fair Value of
Financial Instruments regarding the Companys adoption of FAS 157.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141(R) Business Combinations (FAS 141(R)). FAS
141(R) replaces FAS No. 141 Business Combinations (FAS 141), but retains the fundamental
requirements in FAS 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. FAS 141(R)
requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as
of that date. FAS 141(R) also requires acquisition-related costs to be recognized separately from
the acquisition, requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contractual
contingencies to be recognized at their acquisition-date fair values and requires goodwill to be
recognized as the excess of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair values of the identifiable net
assets acquired. FAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end companies). The Company is
currently evaluating the provisions of FAS 141(R) and its potential impact on future financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160). FAS 160 amends ARB No. 51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. FAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at
the amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent
and the noncontrolling interest. This statement also establishes a method of accounting for changes in
a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation and for changes
in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that does result in deconsolidation. FAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end companies). The presentation and
disclosure requirements of FAS 160 shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The
Company is currently evaluating the provisions of FAS 160 and its potential impact on future
financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (FAS 161). FAS 161 requires
enhanced interim and annual disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities
including how and why the entity uses derivative instruments, how the entity accounts for its
derivatives under FAS Statement No. 133 (Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities), and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the entitys financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end companies). The
Company is currently evaluating the provisions of FAS 161 and its potential impact on future
financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162 The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (FAS 162). FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for selecting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of entities that are
presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The current U.S. GAAP hierarchy is found in auditing
literature and is focused on the auditor rather than the entity. FAS 162 shall be effective 60
days after the SECs approval of the Public Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411
The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
Company does not anticipate any impact on future financial statements due to the adoption of FAS
162.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 163 Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance
Contracts an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60 (FAS 163). FAS 163 clarifies how FAS 60
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claim liabilities. FAS
163 also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. FAS 163
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar
year-end companies), and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company currently does not
provide financial guarantee insurance, and as such does not anticipate any impact on future
financial statements due to the adoption of FAS 163.
-6-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
4. ACQUISITION OF FINIAL INSURANCE COMPANY
In November 2007, Allied World Assurance Holdings (U.S.) Inc. entered into an agreement to
purchase all of the outstanding stock of Finial Insurance Company (formerly known as Converium
Insurance (North America) Inc.) from Finial Reinsurance Company, an affiliate of Berkshire Hathaway
Inc. Finial Insurance Company was renamed Allied World Reinsurance Company, is currently licensed
to write insurance and reinsurance in 49 states and the District of Columbia and has been used to
launch the Companys new reinsurance operations in the United States. This transaction closed on
February 29, 2008 for a purchase price of $12,000 plus the Finial Insurance Companys
policyholders surplus of $47,082 and an adjustment for the difference between the fair values of
investments acquired under U.S. GAAP and statutory reporting of $300. The total purchase price of
$59,382 was paid in cash from existing resources. As a part of the acquisition, the Company
recorded $12,000 of intangible assets with indefinite lives for the value of the insurance and
reinsurance licenses acquired. The remaining assets and liabilities acquired were principally
comprised of bonds, at fair value, of $31,690, cash of $15,330, other assets of $1,176, deferred
tax liabilities of $4,344 and a reserve for losses and loss expenses of $104,914, of which 100%
were recorded as reinsurance recoverable as the entire reserve for losses and loss expenses is
ceded to National Indemnity Company, an affiliate of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. The Company also
recognized goodwill of $3,530 related to this acquisition, which is included in goodwill and other
intangible assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
5. INVESTMENTS
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value of total
investments by category as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
2,046,132 |
|
|
$ |
45,292 |
|
|
$ |
(914 |
) |
|
$ |
2,090,510 |
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
113,526 |
|
|
|
18,197 |
|
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
131,325 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,368,520 |
|
|
|
6,799 |
|
|
|
(13,318 |
) |
|
|
1,362,001 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
63,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,409 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
1,969,844 |
|
|
|
15,298 |
|
|
|
(22,998 |
) |
|
|
1,962,144 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
123,680 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
124,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available for sale |
|
|
5,685,111 |
|
|
|
86,110 |
|
|
|
(37,698 |
) |
|
|
5,733,523 |
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
192,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,661 |
|
Global high-yield bond fund |
|
|
81,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,797 |
) |
|
|
77,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,959,013 |
|
|
$ |
86,110 |
|
|
$ |
(41,495 |
) |
|
$ |
6,003,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
1,987,577 |
|
|
$ |
65,653 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
2,053,224 |
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
100,440 |
|
|
|
18,694 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
118,843 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,248,338 |
|
|
|
10,114 |
|
|
|
(5,835 |
) |
|
|
1,252,617 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
2,095,561 |
|
|
|
22,880 |
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
2,117,539 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
164,027 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
164,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available for sale |
|
|
5,595,943 |
|
|
|
118,238 |
|
|
|
(7,038 |
) |
|
|
5,707,143 |
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
215,173 |
|
|
|
27,250 |
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
241,435 |
|
Global high-yield bond fund |
|
|
75,125 |
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,549 |
|
Other invested asset |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,887,401 |
|
|
$ |
149,912 |
|
|
$ |
(8,026 |
) |
|
$ |
6,029,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the adoption of FAS 159 as of January 1, 2008, the Companys investment in hedge funds
is included in other invested assets, at fair value on the unaudited condensed consolidated
balance sheet. As of June 30, 2008, the Companys investment in the global high-yield bond fund is
included in other invested assets available for sale, at fair value on the unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2007, the Companys investment in hedge funds, the
global high-yield bond fund and
other invested assets were included in other invested assets available for sale, at fair
value on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet.
-7-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the carrying value of its investments to determine
if a decline in value is considered to be other than temporary. This review involves consideration
of several factors including: (i) the significance of the decline in value and the resulting
unrealized loss position; (ii) the time period for which there has been a significant decline in
value; (iii) an analysis of the issuer of the investment, including its liquidity, business
prospects and overall financial position; and (iv) the Companys intent and ability to hold the
investment for a sufficient period of time for the value to recover. The identification of
potentially impaired investments involves significant management judgment that includes the
determination of their fair value and the assessment of whether any decline in value is other than
temporary. If the decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, then the Company
records a realized loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income in
the period that it is determined.
As of June 30, 2008, the Companys investment portfolio had gross unrealized losses of
$41,495, that were primarily the result of increases in market interest rates during 2008 for fixed
maturity investments with similar duration to our fixed maturity investments, which caused the
market price of our fixed maturity investments to decrease. Following the Companys review of the
securities in its investment portfolio, 124 and 207 securities were considered to be
other-than-temporarily impaired for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Consequently, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $25,907 and $37,277
within net realized investment losses on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
The declines in market value of these securities were primarily due to the write-down of
residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities due to the widening of credit spreads caused
by the continued decline in the U.S. housing market. All of the residential and commercial
mortgage-backed securities written down were AAA rated securities. Given the current market
environment for mortgage-backed securities, it is difficult to determine when recovery will occur
and as such the Company recorded an other-than-temporary charge. Also included in the
other-than-temporary impairment charge during the three months ended June 30, 2008 was a write-down
of $1,000 related to the Companys investment in bonds issued by a commercial bank and a write down
of $1,160 of the other invested asset. The Company performed an analysis of the issuers, including
their liquidity, business prospects and overall financial position and concluded that an
other-than-temporary charge should be recognized.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, 73 and 375 securities were considered to
be other-than-temporarily impaired and as a result the Company recorded an other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $2,941 and $12,323, within net realized investment losses on the unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
During 2007, the Company submitted a redemption notice to sell its shares in the Goldman Sachs
Global Equity Opportunities Fund, plc. The Company sold its shares on February 29, 2008 and
recognized a loss on the sale of $278, which is included in net realized investment losses in the
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
On June 30, 2007, the Company sold its shares in the Goldman Sachs Liquid Trading
Opportunities Fund Offshore, Ltd. (the LTO Fund). The gain on the sale amounted to $484, which
has been included in net realized investment losses in the unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
6. DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
On July 21, 2006, the Company issued $500,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Notes
due August 1, 2016 (Senior Notes), with interest on the Senior Notes payable on August 1 and
February 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2007. The Senior Notes were offered by the
underwriters at a price of 99.71% of their principal amount, providing an effective yield to
investors of 7.54%. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the Senior Notes to repay the
outstanding amount of its then existing credit agreement as well as to provide additional capital
to its subsidiaries and for other general corporate purposes.
The Senior Notes can be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity subject to payment of a
make-whole premium. The Company has no current expectations of calling the Senior Notes prior to
maturity. The Senior Notes contain certain covenants that include: (i) limitations on liens on
stock of designated subsidiaries; (ii) limitation as to the disposition of stock of designated
subsidiaries; and (iii) limitations on mergers, amalgamations, consolidations or sale of assets.
The Company was in compliance with all covenants related to its Senior Notes as of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007.
-8-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
Events of default include: (i) the default in the payment of any interest or principal on any
outstanding notes, and the continuance of such default for a period of 30 days; (ii) the default in
the performance, or breach, of any of the covenants in the indenture (other than a covenant added
solely for the benefit of another series of debt securities) and continuance of such default or
breach for a period of 60 days after the Company has received written notice specifying such
default or breach; and (iii) certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization. Where an
event of default occurs and is continuing, either the trustee of the Senior Notes or the holders of
not less than 25% in principal amount of the Senior Notes may have the right to declare that all
unpaid principal amounts and accrued interest then outstanding be due and payable immediately.
In March 2007, the Company entered into a collateralized $750,000 amended letter of credit
facility (the Credit Facility) with Citibank Europe plc. The Credit Facility will be used to
issue standby letters of credit.
In November 2007, the Company entered into a $800,000 five-year senior credit facility
(the Facility) with a syndication of lenders. The Facility consists of a $400,000 secured letter
of credit facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit (the Secured Facility) and a
$400,000 unsecured facility for the making of revolving loans and for the issuance of standby
letters of credit (the Unsecured Facility). Both the Secured Facility and the Unsecured Facility
have options to increase the aggregate commitments by up to $200,000, subject to approval of the
lenders. The Facility will be used for general corporate purposes and to issue standby letters of
credit. The Facility contains representations, warranties and covenants customary for similar bank
loan facilities, including a covenant to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to total
capitalization as of the last day of each fiscal quarter or fiscal year of not greater than 0.35 to
1.0 and a covenant under the Unsecured Facility to maintain a certain consolidated net worth. In
addition, each material insurance subsidiary must maintain a financial strength rating from A.M.
Best Company of at least A- under the Unsecured Facility and of at least B++ under the Secured
Facility. The Company is in compliance with all covenants under the Facility as of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007.
The Company currently has access to up to $1,550,000 in letters of credit under the two
letter of credit facilities described above. These facilities are used to provide security to
reinsureds and are collateralized by the Company, at least to the extent of letters of credit
outstanding at any given time. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were outstanding
letters of credit totaling $887,018 and $922,206, respectively, under the two facilities.
Collateral committed to support the letter of credit facilities was $1,188,937 as of June 30, 2008,
compared to $1,170,731 as of December 31, 2007.
At this time, the Company uses trust accounts primarily to meet security requirements for
inter-company and certain related-party reinsurance transactions. The Company also has cash and
cash equivalents and investments on deposit with various state or government insurance departments
or pledged in favor of ceding companies in order to comply with relevant insurance regulations. As
of June 30, 2008, total trust account deposits were $735,807 compared to $802,737 as of December
31, 2007.
7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company adopted FAS 159 as of January 1, 2008, and has elected the fair value option for
its hedge fund investments, which are classified as other invested assets, at fair value in the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. At the time of adoption, the fair value and
carrying value of the hedge fund investments were $241,435 and the net unrealized gain was $26,262.
These funds are comprised of liquid portfolios that have no fixed maturity with the objective of
achieving current income and capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair value option
for its hedge fund investments as the Company believes that recognizing changes in the fair value
of the hedge funds in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income each
period better reflects the results of the Companys investment in the hedge funds rather than
recognizing changes in fair value in accumulated other comprehensive income.
Upon adoption of FAS 159, the Company reclassified the net unrealized gain related to the
hedge funds of $26,262 from accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded a
cumulative-effect adjustment in retained earnings. There was no net deferred tax liability
associated with the net unrealized gain as the hedge fund investments are held by Holdings Bermuda
insurance subsidiary, which pays no income tax. Any subsequent change in unrealized gain or loss
of other invested assets, at fair value will be recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income and included in net realized investment gains or losses. Prior
to the adoption of FAS 159 any change in unrealized gain or loss was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. The net gain
recognized for the change in fair value of the hedge fund investments in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income during the three months ended June
30, 2008 was $621. The net loss recognized for the change in fair value of the hedge fund
investments in the
-9-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income during the
six months ended June 30, 2008 was $11,866.
The Company adopted FAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. This statement defines fair value and
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP. FAS 157 defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 also established a
three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy
is based upon whether the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability are observable or
unobservable in the market at the measurement date, with quoted market prices being the highest
level (Level 1) and unobservable inputs being the lowest level (Level 3). A fair value measurement
will fall within the level of the hierarchy based on the input that is significant to determining
such measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or
liability. |
The following table shows the fair value of the Companys financial instruments and where in
the FAS 157 fair value hierarchy the fair value measurements are included as of June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
markets for |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Total fair |
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
inputs (Level 3) |
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
2,090,510 |
|
|
$ |
2,090,510 |
|
|
$ |
957,331 |
|
|
$ |
1,133,179 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
131,325 |
|
|
|
131,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,362,001 |
|
|
|
1,362,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,362,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions |
|
|
63,409 |
|
|
|
63,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
1,962,144 |
|
|
|
1,962,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,962,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed |
|
|
124,134 |
|
|
|
124,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available
for sale |
|
|
5,733,523 |
|
|
|
5,733,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other invested assets, available for sale |
|
|
77,444 |
|
|
|
77,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other invested assets, fair value |
|
|
192,661 |
|
|
|
192,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
6,003,628 |
|
|
|
6,003,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
498,738 |
|
|
|
474,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine the fair
value of financial instruments held as of June 30, 2008.
U.S. government and U.S. government agencies: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the U.S.
Treasury, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal
National Mortgage Association. The fair values of the Companys U.S. government securities are
based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are included in the Level 1 fair value
hierarchy. The Company believes the market for U.S. Treasury securities is an actively traded
market given the high level of daily trading volume. The fair values of U.S. government agency
securities are priced using the spread above the risk-free yield curve. As
-10-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
the yields for the
risk-free yield curve are observable market inputs, the fair values of U.S. government agency
securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Non-U.S. government and government agencies: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
non-U.S. governmental entities. The fair values of these securities are based on broker-dealer
quotes, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Corporate: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations that on acquisition are rated BBB-/Baa3
or higher provided that, in aggregate, corporate bonds with ratings of BBB-/Baa3 do not constitute
more than 5% of the market value of the Companys fixed income securities and are diversified
across a wide range of issuers and industries. The fair values of corporate bonds that are
short-term are priced using spread above the London Interbank Offering Rate yield curve, and the
fair value of corporate bonds that are long-term are priced using the spread above the risk-free
yield curve. The spreads are sourced from dealer quotes, trade prices and the new issue market.
As the inputs used to price corporate bonds are observable market inputs, the fair values of
corporate bonds are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
States, municipalities and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
U.S. domiciled state and municipality entities. The fair values of these securities are based on
broker-dealer quotes and the new issue market, and are included in the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy.
Mortgage-backed: Principally comprised of AAA-rated pools of residential and commercial
mortgages originated by both agency (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association) and
non-agency originators. The fair values of mortgage-backed securities originated by U.S.
government agencies and non-U.S. government agencies are based on a pricing model that incorporates
prepayment speeds and spreads to determine appropriate average life of mortgage-backed securities.
The spreads are sourced from dealer quotes, trade prices and the new issue market. As the inputs
used to price the mortgage-backed securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of these
securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Asset-backed: Comprised of primarily AAA-rated bonds backed by pools of automobile loan
receivables, home equity loans and credit card receivables originated by a variety of financial
institutions. The fair values of asset-backed securities are priced using prepayment speed and
spread inputs that are sourced from the new issue market. As the inputs used to price the
asset-backed securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of these securities are
included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Other invested assets available for sale: Comprised of an open-end global high-yield bond
fund that invests in non-investment grade bonds issued by various issuers and industries. The fair
value of the global high-yield bond fund is based on the net asset value as reported by the fund
manager. The net asset value is an observable input as it is quoted on a market exchange on a
daily basis. The fair value of the global high-yield bond fund is included in the Level 2 fair
value hierarchy.
Other invested assets, at fair value: Comprised of several hedge funds with objectives to
seek attractive long-term returns with lower volatility by investing in a range of diversified
investment strategies. The fair values of the hedge funds are based on the net asset value of the
funds as reported by the fund manager less a liquidity discount where hedge fund investments
contain lock-up provisions that prevent immediate dissolution. The Company considers these lock-up
provisions to be obligations that market participants would assign a value to in determining the
price of these hedge funds, and as such have considered these obligations in determining the fair
value measurement of the related hedge funds. The liquidity discount was estimated by calculating
the value of a protective put over the lock-up period. The protective put measures the risk of
holding a restricted asset over a certain time period. The Company used the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to estimate the value of the protective put for each hedge fund. The
aggregate liquidity discount recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $54
and $269, respectively. The net asset value and the liquidity discount are significant
unobservable inputs, and as such the fair values of the Companys hedge funds are included in the
Level 3 fair value hierarchy.
Senior notes: The fair value of the senior notes is based on the price as published by
Bloomberg, which was 94.94% of their principal amount, providing an effective yield of 8.37% as of
June 30, 2008. The fair value of the senior notes is included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
-11-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of financial instruments
using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using significant |
|
|
|
unobservable inputs (Level 3): |
|
|
|
hedge funds |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Opening balance |
|
$ |
191,195 |
|
|
$ |
241,435 |
|
Total gains or losses included in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
6,113 |
|
Change in fair value of hedge fund investments |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
(11,866 |
) |
Purchases or sales |
|
|
(4,039 |
) |
|
|
(43,021 |
) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
192,661 |
|
|
$ |
192,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. INCOME TAXES
Certain subsidiaries of Holdings file U.S. federal income tax returns and various U.S. state
income tax returns, as well as income tax returns in the U.K. and Ireland. The tax years open to
examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for the U.S. subsidiaries are the fiscal years
from 2004 to the present. The tax years open to examination by the Inland Revenue for the U.K.
branches are fiscal years from 2004 to the present. The tax years open to examination by Irish
Revenue Commissioners for the Irish subsidiaries are the
fiscal years from 2003 to the present. To the best of the Companys knowledge, there are no
examinations pending by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, the Inland Revenue or the Irish Revenue
Commissioners.
Management has deemed all material tax provisions to have a greater than 50% likelihood of
being sustained based on technical merits if challenged. The Company has not recorded any interest
or penalties during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and has not accrued any
payment of interest and penalties as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
The Company does not expect any material unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of January
1, 2008.
9. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
a) Authorized shares
The authorized share capital of Holdings as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was
$10,000.
The issued share capital consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Common shares issued and fully paid, par value $0.03 per share |
|
|
48,977,635 |
|
|
|
48,741,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital at end of period |
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, there were outstanding 35,250,977 voting common shares and 13,726,658
non-voting common shares.
b) Dividends
In February 2008, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share payable
on April 3, 2008 to shareholders of record on March 18, 2008. The total dividend paid amounted to
$8,788. In May 2008, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share, payable
on June 12, 2008 to shareholders of record on May 27, 2008. The total dividend paid amounted to
$8,804.
In March 2007, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per common share payable on
April 5, 2007 to shareholders of record on March 20, 2007. The total dividend payable amounted to
$9,052. In May 2007, the Company declared a quarterly
-12-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
dividend of $0.15 per common share that was paid on June 14, 2007 to shareholders of record on
May 29, 2007. The total dividend paid amounted to $9,060.
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
a) Employee option plan
In 2001, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second
Amended and Restated 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, up to 4,000,000
common shares of Holdings may be issued. Holdings has filed a registration statement on Form S-8
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to register common shares issued or reserved for
issuance under the Plan. These options are exercisable in certain limited conditions, expire after
10 years, and generally vest pro-rata over four years from the date of grant. The exercise price of
options issued are determined by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors but shall not
be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares of Holdings on the date the option
award is granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
1,223,875 |
|
|
$ |
31.03 |
|
Granted |
|
|
270,300 |
|
|
|
43.15 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(90,081 |
) |
|
|
27.39 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,252 |
) |
|
|
37.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,396,842 |
|
|
$ |
33.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in the option-pricing model for the options granted during the six months
ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted during |
|
|
|
the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Expected term of option |
|
6.25 years |
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
|
2.52% |
Expected volatility |
|
23.46% |
Dividend yield |
|
1.66% |
Weighted average fair value on grant date |
|
$9.78 |
|
|
|
|
There is limited historical data available for the Company to base the expected term of the
options. As these options are considered to have standard characteristics, the Company has used
the simplified method to determine the expected life as set forth in the SECs Staff Accounting
Bulletins 107 and 110. Likewise, as the Company became a public company in July 2006, there is
limited historical data available on which to base the volatility of its common shares. As such,
the Company used the average of five volatility statistics from comparable companies, as well as
the Companys volatility, in order to derive the volatility value above. The Company has assumed a
forfeiture rate of 4.91% in determining the compensation expense over the service period.
Compensation expense of $632 and $627 relating to the options has been recognized in general
and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Compensation expense of $1,180 and $1,316 relating to the options has been recognized
in general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company recorded in additional
paid-in capital on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets amounts of $15,941 and
$11,840, respectively, in connection with all options granted.
-13-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
b) Stock incentive plan
In 2004, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second
Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan). The Stock Incentive
Plan provides for grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs), dividend equivalent
rights and other equity-based awards. A total of 2,000,000 common shares may be issued under the
Stock Incentive Plan. To date only RSUs have been granted. These RSUs generally vest pro-rata over
four years from the date of grant or in the fourth or fifth year from the original grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
RSUs |
|
Value |
Outstanding RSUs at beginning of period |
|
|
820,890 |
|
|
$ |
36.09 |
|
RSUs granted |
|
|
242,979 |
|
|
|
43.23 |
|
RSUs fully vested |
|
|
(139,664 |
) |
|
|
37.27 |
|
RSUs forfeited |
|
|
(31,210 |
) |
|
|
36.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding RSUs at end of period |
|
|
892,995 |
|
|
$ |
37.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense of $2,276 and $1,859 relating to the issuance of the RSUs has been
recognized in general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Compensation expense of $3,752 and $3,846 relating to the issuance of
the RSUs has been recognized in general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited
condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The compensation expense for the RSUs is based on the fair
market value of Holdings common shares at the time of grant. The Company has assumed a forfeiture
rate of 4.30% in determining the compensation expense over the service period. As of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, the Company has recorded $16,013 and $12,337, respectively, in additional
paid-in capital on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets in connection with the RSUs
awarded.
c) Long-term incentive plan
In 2006, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP ), which provides for performance based equity awards to key employees in
order to promote the long-term growth and profitability of the Company. Each award represents the
right to receive a number of common shares in the future, based upon the achievement of established
performance criteria during the applicable performance period. A total of 2,000,000 common shares
may be issued under the LTIP. The awards granted in 2008 will generally vest after the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2010, or in the fourth or fifth year from the original grant date, subject to
the achievement of the performance conditions and terms of the LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
LTIP |
|
Value |
Outstanding LTIP awards at beginning of period |
|
|
590,834 |
|
|
$ |
40.09 |
|
LTIP awards granted |
|
|
507,152 |
|
|
|
43.27 |
|
LTIP awards subjected to accelerated vesting |
|
|
(11,667 |
) |
|
|
34.00 |
|
LTIP awards forfeited |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
43.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding LTIP awards at end of period |
|
|
1,066,319 |
|
|
$ |
41.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense of $4,563 and $2,960 relating to the LTIP has been recognized in
general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Compensation expense of $8,693 and $6,601 relating to the LTIP has been recognized in
general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The compensation expense for the LTIP is based on the fair market value of Holdings
common shares at the time of grant. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the
-14-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
Company has recorded $25,079 and $16,403, respectively, in additional paid-in capital on the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets in connection with the LTIP awards.
In calculating the compensation expense, and in the determination of share equivalents for the
purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, it is estimated for the LTIP awards granted in
2006 and 2007 that the maximum performance goals as set by the LTIP are likely to be achieved over
the performance period. For the LTIP awards granted in 2008 it is estimated that the target
performance goals as set by the LTIP are likely to be achieved over the performance period. Based
on the target performance goals the LTIP awards granted in 2008 are expensed at 100% of the fair
market value of Holdings common shares on the date of grant. The expense is recognized over the
performance period.
The following table shows the stock compensation expense relating to the stock options, RSUs
and LTIP awards for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
632 |
|
|
$ |
627 |
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
RSUs |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
LTIP |
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
8,693 |
|
|
|
6,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense |
|
$ |
7,471 |
|
|
$ |
5,446 |
|
|
$ |
13,625 |
|
|
$ |
11,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the comparison of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
79,205 |
|
|
$ |
123,287 |
|
|
$ |
210,150 |
|
|
$ |
237,208 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
48,897,931 |
|
|
|
60,397,591 |
|
|
|
48,585,015 |
|
|
|
60,028,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
4.33 |
|
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
79,205 |
|
|
$ |
123,287 |
|
|
$ |
210,150 |
|
|
$ |
237,208 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
48,897,931 |
|
|
|
60,397,591 |
|
|
|
48,585,015 |
|
|
|
60,028,523 |
|
Share equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants and options |
|
|
1,125,506 |
|
|
|
1,833,078 |
|
|
|
1,436,960 |
|
|
|
1,651,842 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
327,128 |
|
|
|
340,305 |
|
|
|
391,518 |
|
|
|
351,913 |
|
LTIP awards |
|
|
523,147 |
|
|
|
303,261 |
|
|
|
600,140 |
|
|
|
244,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and common
share equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
50,873,712 |
|
|
|
62,874,235 |
|
|
|
51,013,633 |
|
|
|
62,277,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
$ |
4.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, a weighted average of 493,533 employee stock
options were considered antidilutive and were therefore excluded from the calculation of the
diluted earnings per share. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, a weighted average of
28,000 employee stock options were considered antidilutive and were therefore excluded from the
calculation of the diluted earnings per share.
For the three-month period ended June 30, 2007, a weighted average of 6,500 employee stock
options were considered antidilutive and were therefore excluded from the calculation of the
diluted earnings per share. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, a weighted average of
3,250 employee stock options were considered antidilutive and were therefore excluded from the
calculation of the diluted earnings per share.
-15-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The determination of reportable segments is based on how senior management monitors the
Companys underwriting operations. The Company measures the results of its underwriting operations
under three major business categories, namely property insurance, casualty insurance and
reinsurance. All product lines fall within these classifications.
The property segment provides direct coverage of physical property and energy-related risks.
These risks generally relate to tangible assets and are considered short-tail in that the time
from a claim being advised to the date when the claim is settled is relatively short. The casualty
segment provides direct coverage of general liability risks, professional liability risks and
healthcare risks. Such risks are long-tail in nature since the emergence and settlement of a
claim can take place many years after the policy period has expired. The reinsurance segment
includes any reinsurance of other companies in the insurance and reinsurance industries. The
Company writes reinsurance on both a treaty and facultative basis.
Responsibility and accountability for the results of underwriting operations are assigned by
major line of business on a worldwide basis. Because the Company does not manage its assets by
segment, investment income, interest expense and total assets are not allocated to individual
reportable segments.
Management measures results for each segment on the basis of the loss and loss expense
ratio, acquisition cost ratio, general and administrative expense ratio and the combined
ratio. The loss and loss expense ratio is derived by dividing net losses and loss expenses by
net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio is derived by dividing acquisition costs by net
premiums earned. The general and administrative expense ratio is derived by dividing general and
administrative expenses by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and
loss expense ratio, the acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
The following table provides a summary of the segment results for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
131,973 |
|
|
$ |
178,212 |
|
|
$ |
136,599 |
|
|
$ |
446,784 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
54,289 |
|
|
|
129,335 |
|
|
|
136,626 |
|
|
|
320,250 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
44,164 |
|
|
|
105,604 |
|
|
|
119,108 |
|
|
|
268,876 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(62,593 |
) |
|
|
(41,764 |
) |
|
|
(73,727 |
) |
|
|
(178,084 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
2,976 |
|
|
|
(5,229 |
) |
|
|
(24,012 |
) |
|
|
(26,265 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(10,963 |
) |
|
|
(24,286 |
) |
|
|
(11,131 |
) |
|
|
(46,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting (loss) income |
|
|
(26,416 |
) |
|
|
34,325 |
|
|
|
10,238 |
|
|
|
18,147 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,345 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,393 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,513 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
141.7 |
% |
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
(6.7 |
)% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
159.8 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
91.4 |
% |
|
|
93.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-16-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
156,463 |
|
|
$ |
188,091 |
|
|
$ |
185,995 |
|
|
$ |
530,549 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
58,947 |
|
|
|
141,620 |
|
|
|
186,020 |
|
|
|
386,587 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
48,318 |
|
|
|
123,715 |
|
|
|
131,086 |
|
|
|
303,119 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(34,149 |
) |
|
|
(60,908 |
) |
|
|
(81,168 |
) |
|
|
(176,225 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(5,033 |
) |
|
|
(26,734 |
) |
|
|
(31,872 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(8,163 |
) |
|
|
(16,711 |
) |
|
|
(9,558 |
) |
|
|
(34,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
5,901 |
|
|
|
41,063 |
|
|
|
13,626 |
|
|
|
60,590 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,937 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,481 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,482 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
70.7 |
% |
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
87.8 |
% |
|
|
66.8 |
% |
|
|
89.6 |
% |
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
218,033 |
|
|
$ |
299,274 |
|
|
$ |
326,350 |
|
|
$ |
843,657 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
100,886 |
|
|
|
219,970 |
|
|
|
325,966 |
|
|
|
646,822 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
87,745 |
|
|
|
214,718 |
|
|
|
239,485 |
|
|
|
541,948 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(77,340 |
) |
|
|
(114,879 |
) |
|
|
(129,362 |
) |
|
|
(321,581 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
2,427 |
|
|
|
(8,499 |
) |
|
|
(47,033 |
) |
|
|
(53,105 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(21,457 |
) |
|
|
(47,994 |
) |
|
|
(20,200 |
) |
|
|
(89,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting (loss) income |
|
|
(8,625 |
) |
|
|
43,346 |
|
|
|
42,890 |
|
|
|
77,611 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,276 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(928 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,023 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
206,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
88.1 |
% |
|
|
53.5 |
% |
|
|
54.0 |
% |
|
|
59.3 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
109.8 |
% |
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
82.0 |
% |
|
|
85.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2007 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
258,328 |
|
|
$ |
313,280 |
|
|
$ |
397,347 |
|
|
$ |
968,955 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
105,079 |
|
|
|
242,265 |
|
|
|
397,087 |
|
|
|
744,431 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
92,809 |
|
|
|
248,124 |
|
|
|
248,752 |
|
|
|
589,685 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(41,014 |
) |
|
|
(151,275 |
) |
|
|
(149,931 |
) |
|
|
(342,220 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(11,071 |
) |
|
|
(49,560 |
) |
|
|
(61,068 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(15,920 |
) |
|
|
(32,018 |
) |
|
|
(19,697 |
) |
|
|
(67,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
35,438 |
|
|
|
53,760 |
|
|
|
29,564 |
|
|
|
118,762 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,585 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,965 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,856 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
237,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
61.0 |
% |
|
|
60.3 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
61.8 |
% |
|
|
78.3 |
% |
|
|
88.1 |
% |
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-17-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share, per share and percentage information)
The following table shows an analysis of the Companys net premiums written by geographic
location of the Companys
subsidiaries for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. All inter-company
premiums have been eliminated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bermuda |
|
$ |
191,022 |
|
|
$ |
302,480 |
|
|
$ |
454,564 |
|
|
$ |
593,082 |
|
United States |
|
|
79,238 |
|
|
|
34,203 |
|
|
|
102,358 |
|
|
|
57,113 |
|
Europe |
|
|
49,990 |
|
|
|
49,904 |
|
|
|
89,900 |
|
|
|
94,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net premiums written |
|
$ |
320,250 |
|
|
$ |
386,587 |
|
|
$ |
646,822 |
|
|
$ |
744,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
COMMITMENTS AND SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Holdings entered into a definitive agreement and plan of merger (the Merger Agreement) on
June 27, 2008 with Allied World Merger Company, a newly formed Delaware corporation and an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (Merger Sub), and Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc.
(Darwin), a Delaware corporation. The Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Merger Sub
with and into Darwin, with Darwin continuing as the surviving corporation and an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings. Darwin offers a wide array of specialty and primary
professional lines coverages, including a healthcare professional liability franchise and a niche
errors and omissions division.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, stockholders of Darwin will be entitled to
receive $32.00 in cash for each share of Darwin common stock in exchange for 100% of their
interests in Darwin. Also, each outstanding Darwin stock option will fully vest and be converted
into an amount in cash equal to (i) the excess, if any, of $32.00 over the exercise price per share
of the stock option, multiplied by (ii) the total number of shares of Darwin common stock subject
to the stock option. In addition, each outstanding Darwin restricted share will fully vest and be
converted into the right to receive $32.00 in cash per restricted share, and each outstanding
director share unit will be converted into the right to receive $32.00 in cash per share unit. The
total cash consideration to be paid by the Company will be
approximately $550,000. The $32.00 per share purchase price is
subject to a downward adjustment in the event that certain
representations by Darwin in the Merger Agreement with respect to its
capitalization are breached and, as a result of such breach, the
aggregate consideration payable by the Company in the merger is
increased by more than $1,000. The transaction
is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2008 subject to customary closing
conditions, including regulatory approvals. The transaction will be accounted for as a purchase.
Under the purchase method of accounting for a business combination, the assets and liabilities of
Darwin will be recorded at their fair values on the acquisition date.
On August 7, 2008, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share,
payable on September 11, 2008 to shareholders of record on August 26, 2008.
-18-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. References in this Form 10-Q to the terms we, us,
our, the company or other similar terms mean the consolidated operations of Allied World
Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.
References in this Form 10-Q to the term Holdings means Allied World Assurance Company Holdings,
Ltd only.
Note on Forward-Looking Statement
This Form 10-Q and other publicly available documents may include, and our officers and
representatives may from time to time make, projections concerning financial information and
statements concerning future economic performance and events, plans and objectives relating to
management, operations, products and services, and assumptions underlying these projections and
statements. These projections and statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are not historical facts but instead
represent only our belief regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and outside our control. These projections and statements may address, among other
things, our strategy for growth, product development, financial results and reserves. Actual
results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from these projections and
statements and therefore you should not place undue reliance on them. Factors that could cause our
actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific projections and
statements are discussed throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and in Risk Factors in Item 1A. of Part I of our 2007 Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 29,
2008. We are under no obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to update or revise
any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
Overview
Our Business
We write a diversified portfolio of property and casualty insurance and reinsurance lines of
business internationally through our subsidiaries or branches based in Bermuda, the United States,
Ireland and the United Kingdom. We manage our business through three operating segments: property,
casualty and reinsurance. As of June 30, 2008, we had $8.5 billion of total assets, $2.4 billion
of shareholders equity and $2.9 billion of total capital, which includes shareholders equity and
senior notes.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we experienced rate declines from increased
competition across all of our operating segments. This trend of increased competition and
decreasing rates has continued during the six months ended June 30, 2008, and we expect this trend
to continue during the remainder of 2008. Given this trend, we continue to be selective in the
policies and reinsurance contracts we underwrite. Our consolidated gross premiums written
decreased $83.7 million, or 15.8%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2007. Our consolidated gross premiums decreased $125.3 million, or 12.9%,
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Our net
income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $44.1 million, or 35.8%, to $79.2 million
compared to $123.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. During the three months ended
June 30, 2008, we were negatively impacted by net losses and loss expenses recognized of $41.0
million related to both the floods in the U.S. Midwest and a gas pipeline explosion in Australia.
Our net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased $27.0 million, or 11.4%, to $210.2
million compared to $237.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Recent Developments
On
June 27, 2008, we entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Darwin Professional
Underwriters, Inc. (Darwin). Darwin offers healthcare professional liability, errors and
omissions and other specialty and primary professional liability coverages. Darwin had total gross
premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $280.3 million, which would have
represented, on a pro-forma basis, approximately 16% of our total gross premiums written for the
year ended December 31, 2007. Under the terms of the merger agreement, stockholders of Darwin will
be entitled to receive $32.00 per share in cash for each share of Darwin common stock in exchange
for 100% of their interests in Darwin. Also, each outstanding Darwin stock option will fully vest
and be converted
into an amount in cash equal to (i) the excess, if any, of $32.00 over the exercise price per
share of the stock option, multiplied by (ii) the total number of shares of Darwin common stock
subject to the stock option. In addition, each outstanding Darwin restricted share
-19-
will fully vest
and be converted into the right to receive $32.00 in cash per restricted share, and each
outstanding director share unit will be converted into the right to receive $32.00 in cash per
share unit. The total cash consideration to be paid by us will be
approximately $550 million. The $32.00 per share purchase price
is subject to a downward adjustment in the event that certain
representations by Darwin in the merger agreement with respect to its
capitalization are breached and, as a result of such breach, the
aggregate consideration payable by us in the merger is increased by
more than $1 million. The
transaction is expected to be completed during the fourth quarter of 2008 subject to customary
closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. The transaction will be accounted for as a
purchase. Under the purchase method of accounting for a business combination, the assets and
liabilities of Darwin will be recorded at their fair values on the acquisition date.
Relevant Factors
Revenues
We derive our revenues primarily from premiums on our insurance policies and reinsurance
contracts, net of any reinsurance or retrocessional coverage purchased. Insurance and reinsurance
premiums are a function of the amounts and types of policies and contracts we write, as well as
prevailing market prices. Our prices are determined before our ultimate costs, which may extend far
into the future, are known. In addition, our revenues include income generated from our investment
portfolio, consisting of net investment income and net realized gains or losses. Investment income
is principally derived from interest and dividends earned on investments, partially offset by
investment management fees and fees paid to our custodian bank. Net realized gains or losses
include (1) net realized investment gains or losses from the sale of investments, (2) write-downs
related to declines in the market value of securities on our available for sale portfolio that were
considered to be other than temporary and (3) the change in the fair value of investments that we
mark-to-market in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Expenses
Our expenses consist largely of net losses and loss expenses, acquisition costs and general
and administrative expenses. Net losses and loss expenses incurred are comprised of three main
components:
|
|
|
losses paid, which are actual cash payments to insureds or losses payable to insureds,
net of recoveries from reinsurers; |
|
|
|
|
outstanding loss or case reserves, which represent managements best estimate of the
likely settlement amount for known claims, less the portion that can be recovered from
reinsurers; and |
|
|
|
|
reserves for losses incurred but not reported, or IBNR, which are reserves established
by us for claims that are not yet reported but can reasonably be expected to have occurred
based on industry information, managements experience and/or actuarial evaluation. The
portion recoverable from reinsurers is deducted from the gross estimated loss. |
Acquisition costs are comprised of commissions, brokerage fees and insurance taxes.
Commissions and brokerage fees are usually calculated as a percentage of premiums and depend on the
market and line of business. Acquisition costs are reported after (1) deducting commissions
received on ceded reinsurance, (2) deducting the part of acquisition costs relating to unearned
premiums and (3) including the amortization of previously deferred acquisition costs.
General and administrative expenses include personnel expenses including stock-based
compensation charges, rent expense, professional fees, information technology costs and other
general operating expenses. We are experiencing increases in general and administrative expenses
resulting from additional staff, increased stock-based compensation expense, increased rent expense
for our U.S. offices, increased professional fees and additional amortization expense for
building-related and infrastructure expenditures. We believe this trend will continue during the
remainder of 2008 as we continue to hire additional staff and build our infrastructure.
Ratios
Management measures results for each segment on the basis of the loss and loss expense
ratio, acquisition cost ratio, general and administrative expense ratio, expense ratio and
the combined ratio. Because we do not manage our assets by segment, investment income, interest
expense and total assets are not allocated to individual reportable segments. General and
administrative expenses are allocated to segments based on various factors, including staff count
and each segments proportional share of gross premiums written. The loss and loss expense ratio
is derived by dividing net losses and loss expenses by net premiums earned. The
acquisition cost ratio is derived by dividing acquisition costs by net premiums earned. The
general and administrative expense ratio is derived by dividing general and administrative
expenses by net premiums earned. The expense ratio is the sum of the acquisition cost ratio and
the general and administrative expense ratio. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss
expense ratio, the acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
-20-
Critical Accounting Policies
It is important to understand our accounting policies in order to understand our financial
position and results of operations. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect determinations that are inherently subjective in nature and require management to make
assumptions and best estimates to determine the reported values. If events or other factors cause
actual results to differ materially from managements underlying assumptions or estimates, there
could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe
that some of the more critical judgments in the areas of accounting estimates and assumptions that
affect our financial condition and results of operations are related to reserves for losses and
loss expenses, reinsurance recoverables, premiums and acquisition costs, valuation of financial
instruments and other-than-temporary impairment of investments. For a detailed discussion of our
critical accounting policies please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC. There were no material changes in the application of our
critical accounting estimates subsequent to that report, except as discussed below related to the
valuation of financial instruments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Under existing accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP), we
are required to recognize certain assets at their fair value in our condensed consolidated balance
sheets. This includes our fixed maturity investments, global high-yield bond fund and hedge funds.
Fair value, as defined in Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (FAS
157), is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 also established
a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation
hierarchy is based upon whether the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability are observable
or unobservable in the market at the measurement date, with quoted market prices being the highest
level (Level 1) and unobservable inputs being the lowest level (Level 3). A fair value measurement
will fall within the level of the hierarchy based on the input that is significant to determining
such measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or
liability. |
At each measurement date, we estimate the fair value of the financial instruments using
various valuation techniques. We utilize, to the extent available, quoted market prices in active
markets or observable market inputs in estimating the fair value of our financial instruments.
When quoted market prices or observable market inputs are not available, we utilize valuation
techniques that rely on unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value of financial instruments.
The following describes the valuation techniques used by us to determine the fair value of
financial instruments held as of June 30, 2008 and what level within the FAS 157 fair value
hierarchy the valuation technique resides.
U.S. government and U.S. government agencies: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the U.S.
Treasury, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal
National Mortgage Association. The fair values of U.S. government securities are based on quoted
market prices in active markets, and are included in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy. We believe
the market for U.S. Treasury securities is an actively traded market given the high level of daily
trading volume. The fair values of U.S. government agency securities are priced using the spread
above the risk-free yield curve. As the yields for the risk-free yield curve are observable market
inputs, the fair values of U.S. government agency securities are included in the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy.
Non-U.S. government and government agencies: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
non-U.S. governmental entities. The fair values of these securities are based on broker-dealer
quotes, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Corporate: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations that on acquisition are rated BBB-/Baa3
or higher provided that, in aggregate, corporate bonds with ratings of BBB-/Baa3 do not constitute
more than 5% of the market value of our fixed income securities, and are diversified across a wide
range of issuers and industries. The fair values of corporate bonds that are short-term are
-21-
priced
using spread above the London Interbank Offering Rate yield curve, and the fair value of corporate
bonds that are long-term are priced using the spread above the risk-free yield curve. The spreads
are sourced from dealer quotes, trade prices and the new issue market. As the inputs used to price
corporate bonds are observable market inputs, the fair values of corporate bonds are included in
the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
States, municipalities and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
U.S. domiciled state and municipality entities. The fair values of these securities are based on
broker-dealer quotes and the new issue market, and are included in the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy.
Mortgage-backed: Principally comprised of AAA-rated pools of residential and commercial
mortgages originated by both agency (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association) and
non-agency originators. The fair values of mortgage-backed securities originated by U.S.
government agencies and non-U.S. government agencies are based on a pricing model that incorporates
prepayment speeds and spreads to determine appropriate average life of mortgage-backed securities.
The spreads are sourced from dealer quotes, trade prices and the new issue market. As the inputs
used to price the mortgage-backed securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of these
securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Asset-backed: Comprised of primarily AAA-rated bonds backed by pools of automobile loan
receivables, home equity loans and credit card receivables originated by a variety of financial
institutions. The fair values of asset-backed securities are priced using prepayment speed and
spread inputs that are sourced from the new issue market. As the inputs used to price the
asset-backed securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of these securities are
included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Other invested assets available for sale: Comprised of an open-end global high-yield bond
fund that invests in non-investment grade bonds issued by various issuers and industries. The fair
value of the global high-yield bond fund is based on the net asset value as reported by the fund
manager. The net asset value is an observable input as it is quoted on a market exchange on a
daily basis. The fair value of the global high-yield bond fund is included in the Level 2 fair
value hierarchy.
Other invested assets, at fair value: Comprised of several hedge funds with objectives to
seek attractive long-term returns with lower volatility by investing in a range of diversified
investment strategies. The fair values of the hedge funds are based on the net asset value of the
funds as reported by the fund manager less a liquidity discount where hedge fund investments
contain lock-up provisions that prevent immediate dissolution. We consider these lock-up
provisions to be obligations that market participants would assign a value to in determining the
price of these hedge funds, and as such have considered these obligations in determining the fair
value measurement of the related hedge funds. The liquidity discount was estimated by calculating
the value of a protective put over the lock-up period. The protective put measures the risk of
holding a restricted asset over a certain time period. We used the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model to estimate the value of the protective put for each hedge fund. The aggregate liquidity
discount recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $0.1 million and $0.3
million, respectively. The net asset value and the liquidity discount are significant unobservable
inputs, and as such the fair values of the hedge funds are included in the Level 3 fair value
hierarchy. Our hedge funds are the only assets that have significant Level 3 inputs in determining
fair value. The hedge funds represent 3.2% of our total investments.
There have been no material changes to any of our valuation techniques from what those used as
of December 31, 2007. Since fair valuing a financial instrument is an estimate of what a willing
buyer would pay for our asset if we sold it, we will not know the ultimate value of our financial
instruments until they are sold. We believe the valuation techniques utilized provide us with the
best estimate of the price that would be received to sell our assets in an orderly transaction
between participants at the measurement date.
-22-
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated statement of operations data for each
of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
446.8 |
|
|
$ |
530.5 |
|
|
$ |
843.7 |
|
|
$ |
969.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
320.3 |
|
|
$ |
386.6 |
|
|
$ |
646.8 |
|
|
$ |
744.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
268.9 |
|
|
|
303.1 |
|
|
|
541.9 |
|
|
|
589.7 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
72.4 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
149.3 |
|
|
|
146.6 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
336.9 |
|
|
$ |
375.5 |
|
|
$ |
690.3 |
|
|
$ |
728.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
178.1 |
|
|
$ |
176.2 |
|
|
$ |
321.6 |
|
|
$ |
342.2 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
34.4 |
|
|
|
89.6 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
259.9 |
|
|
$ |
252.5 |
|
|
$ |
483.4 |
|
|
$ |
490.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
77.0 |
|
|
$ |
123.0 |
|
|
$ |
206.9 |
|
|
$ |
238.0 |
|
Income tax (recovery) expense |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
79.2 |
|
|
$ |
123.3 |
|
|
$ |
210.2 |
|
|
$ |
237.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
58.1 |
% |
|
|
59.3 |
% |
|
|
58.0 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
93.2 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
85.6 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums
Gross premiums written decreased by $83.7 million, or 15.8%, for the three months ended June
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in gross premiums written
was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
The non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which
included pricing and/or policy and contract terms and conditions), increased competition
and decreasing rates for new and renewal business in each of our operating segments. |
|
|
|
|
In our reinsurance segment, adjustments on estimated premiums were lower by $17.0
million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2007. We recognized net downward adjustments of $5.9 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $11.1 million during
the three months ended June 30, 2007. Given declining market rates, actual premiums are
lower than the estimated premiums thus resulting in downward premium adjustments during
the three months ended June 30, 2008. As our historical experience develops, we may
have fewer or smaller adjustments to our estimated premiums. Gross premiums written
also decreased in our reinsurance segment by approximately $7.0 million because some
cedents purchased less reinsurance. |
|
|
|
|
In our property segment, we reduced the amount of gross premiums written in our
energy line of business by $12.8 million, or 40.6%, in response to deteriorating market
conditions. |
|
|
|
|
We also reduced the amount of gross premiums written for certain energy classes of
business within our casualty segment by $6.4 million in response to deteriorating market
conditions. |
-23-
The table below
illustrates our gross premiums written by geographic location for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Bermuda |
|
$ |
258.9 |
|
|
$ |
392.4 |
|
|
$ |
(133.5 |
) |
|
|
(34.0 |
)% |
United States |
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
Europe |
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
446.8 |
|
|
$ |
530.5 |
|
|
$ |
(83.7 |
) |
|
|
(15.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross premiums written for our Bermuda operations, in addition to the factors
discussed above, was due to the fact that certain policies and treaties that were previously
written in Bermuda during the three months ended June 30, 2007 were renewed in our U.S. companies
during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Our new U.S. reinsurance company commenced operations
in April 2008 and renewed treaties previously written in Bermuda
of $34.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Net premiums written decreased by $66.3 million, or 17.1%, for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. The difference between gross and net
premiums written is the cost to us of purchasing reinsurance, both on a proportional and a
non-proportional basis, including the cost of property catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We ceded
28.3% of gross premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 27.1% for the
same period in 2007. The increase in the cession percentage was primarily due to increased
reinsurance utilization in our casualty segment and an increase in the property catastrophe
reinsurance protection that we purchased. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we made the following changes
to our reinsurance program:
|
|
|
Renewed our property catastrophe reinsurance treaty from May 1, 2008 to April 30,
2009, which resulted in premiums ceded of $26.1 million. The cost of the property
catastrophe reinsurance treaty was higher than the expiring treaty by approximately $7.0
million. The increased cost of the property catastrophe reinsurance
treaty was
principally due to the new treaty expanding earthquake coverage in the U.S. and
increased exposure due to changes in our general property quota share reinsurance
treaty. |
|
|
|
|
Our international property catastrophe treaty was cancelled and rewritten effective
May 1, 2008. This treaty covers worldwide losses, excluding the United States and
Canada. The total ceded premiums written for the international property catastrophe
treaty were $2.0 million. There were no ceded premiums written related to the
international catastrophe property treaty during the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Purchased an excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty for our general property business with
a limit of $15 million excess of $10 million or 10 million excess of 10 million.
The total ceded premiums written for the excess-of-loss treaty were $3.4 million.
There was no excess-of-loss treaty in place during the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Offsetting the increases in reinsurance protection was a reduction in the cession
percentage on our general property quota share reinsurance treaty from 55% to 40%. |
Net premiums earned decreased by $34.2 million, or 11.3%, for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 as a result of lower net premiums written.
The percentage decrease in net premiums earned was lower than that of net premiums written due to
the continued earning of higher net premiums that were written prior to the three months ended June
30, 2008.
-24-
We evaluate our business by segment, distinguishing between property insurance, casualty
insurance and reinsurance. The following chart illustrates the mix of our business on both a gross
premiums written and net premiums earned basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Premiums |
|
Premiums |
|
|
Written |
|
Earned |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Property
|
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Casualty
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
The increase in the percentage of casualty gross premiums written reflects the continued
growth of our U.S. operations, where casualty gross premiums written increased by $9.9 million, or
32.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Net Investment Income and Realized Investment Losses
Net investment income decreased by $1.5 million, or 2.0%, for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily the result of
lower yields on our investment portfolio. The annualized period book yield of the investment
portfolio for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was 4.5% and 4.8%, respectively.
Investment management fees of $1.5 million and $1.6 million were incurred during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Our aggregate invested assets grew due to positive operating cash flows partially offset by
funds used to acquire our common shares from American International Group, Inc. (AIG) in December
2007. As of June 30, 2008, approximately 99% of our fixed income investments (which included
individually held securities and securities held in a global high-yield bond fund) consisted of
investment grade securities. The average credit rating of our fixed income portfolio was AA+ as
rated by Standard & Poors and Aa1 as rated by Moodys Investors Service, with an average duration
of approximately 3.4 years as of June 30, 2008.
Net realized investment losses increased by $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net realized investment losses of $4.4
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
A write-down of approximately $25.9 million related to declines in the market value
of securities in our available for sale portfolio that were considered to be other than
temporary. The declines in market value of these securities were primarily due to the
write-down of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities due to the widening
of credit spreads caused by the continued decline in the U.S. housing market. All of
the residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities written down were AAA rated
securities. Given the current market environment for mortgage-backed securities, it is
difficult to determine when recovery will occur and as such we recorded an
other-than-temporary charge. Also included in the other-than-temporary impairment
charge during the three months ended June 30, 2008 was a write-down of $1.0 million
related to our investment in bonds issued by a commercial bank and a write down of $1.2
million of other invested assets. We performed an analysis of the issuers, including
their liquidity, business prospects and overall financial position and concluded that an
other-than-temporary charge should be recognized. |
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $0.6 million related to the mark-to-market of our
hedge fund investments. On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FAS 159) and elected
to fair value our hedge fund investments. As a result, any change in the fair value of
our hedge fund investments is recognized as realized investment gains or losses in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income at each
reporting period. As we adopted FAS 159 in 2008, there were no realized investment
gains or losses recognized from our hedge fund investments in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income during the three months
ended June 30, 2007 as the change in fair value was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $20.9 million from the sale of securities. We sold a
number of securities during the three months ended June 30, 2008 to fund the increased
capitalization of our direct U.S. operations and our European operations. |
-25-
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, the net loss on fixed income investments included
a write-down of approximately $2.9 million related to declines in the market value of securities in
our available for sale portfolio that were considered to be other than temporary solely due to
changes in interest rates.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses
Net losses and loss expenses increased by $1.9 million, or 1.1%, for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in net losses and
loss expenses was due to higher than expected loss activity in the current period, which included
net losses and loss expenses incurred from the floods in the U.S. Midwest of $11.0 million and a
gas pipeline explosion in Australia of $30.0 million. On June 3, 2008, a pipeline rupture and fire
significantly reduced the supply of natural gas to Western Australia. While not directly exposed
to the pipeline, we provide business interruption protection as part of our property coverage to
other large institutional businesses that depend on the natural gas produced through the pipeline.
The losses from the gas pipeline explosion are in the very early
stages, and we will continue to
monitor our reserve for losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and adjust our
reserve for losses and loss expenses accordingly. The increased loss activity in the current
period was partially offset by net favorable prior year loss development and lower earned premiums
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Because our net exposures tend to vary with net premiums earned, lower net premiums earned will
reduce the ultimate loss reserve amount, and therefore, reduce the losses and loss expenses
incurred.
We recorded net favorable reserve development related to prior years of approximately $39.8
million and $32.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve development
for the three months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $38.0 million was recognized by our casualty
segment primarily as a result of general casualty, professional liability and healthcare
lines of business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss
emergence for the 2002 through 2004 loss years. During the three months ended June 30,
2008, we adjusted our weighting on actuarial methods utilized for these lines of business
and loss years from using the expected loss ratio method to a blend of the
Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported loss method and the expected loss ratio method. Placing
greater reliance on more responsive actuarial methods for certain lines of business and
loss years within our casualty segment is a natural progression as we mature as a company
and gain sufficient historical experience of our own that allows us to further refine our
estimate of the reserve for losses and loss expenses. |
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $2.0 million was recognized by our reinsurance
segment due to favorable development in the 2007 loss year related to windstorm Kyrill and
the floods in the U.K. and Australia. |
The following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve
development for the three months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $30.4 million for our casualty segment was
primarily comprised of $74.8 million of favorable reserve development related to low loss
emergence in our professional liability and healthcare lines of business for the 2003,
2004 and 2006 loss years, and our general casualty line of business for the 2004 loss
year. These favorable reserve developments were partially offset by $46.7 million of
unfavorable reserve development due to higher than anticipated loss emergence in our
general casualty line of business for the 2003 and 2005 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net unfavorable reserve development of $2.9 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our property segment was comprised of $16.0 million of unfavorable reserve
development, which primarily related to higher loss emergence than expected in our general
property line of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years and in our energy line of
business for the 2006 loss year, which was partially offset by $13.1 million of favorable
reserve development primarily in our general property line of business for the 2003 and
2006 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $1.6 million for our European property business
related to the 2004 windstorms. We had no prior year loss reserve development related to
Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma during the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $3.3 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our reinsurance segment comprised of $1.6 million related to low loss
emergence in our property reinsurance lines of business for the 2004 and 2005 |
-26-
|
|
|
loss years and $1.7 million related to low loss emergence in our accident and health
reinsurance line of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 66.2%, compared
to 58.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development recognized in
the three months ended June 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 14.8 percentage
points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods business was 81.0%.
Net favorable reserve development recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2007 reduced the
loss and loss expense ratio by 10.7 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio
related to that periods business was 68.8%. The increase in the current years loss and loss
expense ratio for the current period was primarily due to net incurred losses and loss expenses
related to the flooding in the U.S. Midwest and the gas pipeline explosion in Australia during the
three months ended June 30, 2008.
We continue to review the impact of the subprime and credit related downturn on professional
liability insurance policies and reinsurance contracts we write. We have high attachment points
for our professional liability policies and contracts, which makes estimating whether losses will
exceed our attachment point more difficult. Based on claims information received to date and our
analysis, the average attachment point for our professional liability policies with potential
subprime and credit related exposure is approximately $131 million with average limits of $12
million (gross of reinsurance). Our direct insurance policies with subprime and credit related
loss notices may have the benefit of facultative reinsurance, treaty reinsurance or a combination
of both. For our professional liability reinsurance contracts with potential subprime and credit
related exposure, the average attachment point is approximately $99 million with average limits of
$1.7 million. At this time we believe, based on the claims
information received to date, that our
current IBNR is adequate to meet any potential subprime and credit related losses. As of June 30,
2008, we have recorded case reserves of $5.0 million and $7.5 million in our casualty and
reinsurance operating segments, respectively, for subprime and credit related losses. We will
continue to monitor our reserve for losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and
adjust our reserve for losses and loss expenses accordingly.
The following table shows the components of the increase in net losses and loss expenses of
$1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Net losses paid |
|
$ |
82.9 |
|
|
$ |
107.9 |
|
|
$ |
(25.0 |
) |
Net change in reported case reserves |
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
Net change in IBNR |
|
|
59.8 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
178.1 |
|
|
$ |
176.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses paid have decreased $25.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008
primarily due to lower claim payments relating to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms than the amount paid
during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and due to lower claim payments for our casualty
segment. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, $12.6 million of net losses were paid in
relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to $23.5 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2007. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recovered $3.7 million on our
property catastrophe reinsurance protection in relation to losses paid as a result of the 2004 and
2005 windstorms compared to $8.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in
reported case reserves is due to increased case reserves for our property and reinsurance segments
partially offset by lower case reserves for our casualty segment. The increase in IBNR was
primarily due to increased reserves for losses and loss expenses for our current periods business
partially offset by higher net favorable loss reserve development.
-27-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
3,289.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,995.1 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
176.9 |
|
|
|
208.6 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.8 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
178.1 |
|
|
$ |
176.2 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
81.9 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
82.9 |
|
|
$ |
107.9 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
3,385.6 |
|
|
|
3,064.5 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
778.6 |
|
|
|
679.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
4,164.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,743.7 |
|
Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs decreased by $5.6 million, or 17.6%, for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. Acquisition costs as a percentage of net
premiums earned were 9.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 10.5% for the same
period in 2007. The decrease in this rate was primarily due to increased commissions received on
ceded reinsurance in our casualty segment.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $12.0 million, or 34.9%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The following is a breakdown of the major
factors contributing to the increase:
|
|
|
Salary and employee welfare costs increased by $7.6 million primarily due to our average
staff count increasing by approximately 13.3% as a result of the significant expansion of
our U.S. operations as part of our ongoing U.S. strategic initiatives. The increase in
salary and employee welfare costs of $7.6 million included increased stock-based
compensation costs of $2.0 million. |
|
|
|
|
Information technology costs increased by approximately $1.9 million due to consulting
costs required as part of the development of our technological infrastructure as well as an
increase in the cost of hardware and software. |
|
|
|
|
Professional fees increased by approximately $1.5 million due to increased legal and
other professional fees. |
|
|
|
|
Rent and building-related costs increased by approximately $0.7 million due to
additional office space in New York and Chicago and increased amortization of furniture and
fixtures. |
Our general and administrative expense ratio was 17.2% for the three months ended June 30,
2008, which was higher than the 11.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was
primarily due to the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned declined.
Our expense ratio was 27.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 21.9% for the
three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase resulted from increased general and administrative
expenses.
-28-
Interest Expense
During both the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, interest expense incurred of $9.5
million represented one quarter of the annual interest expense on the senior notes, which bear
interest at an annual rate of 7.50%.
Net Income
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $79.2 million compared to net income
of $123.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily the result
of lower net premiums earned, increased general and administrative expenses and increased loss
activity for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008
included a net foreign exchange gain of $0.4 million and income tax recovery of $2.2 million. Net
income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 included a net foreign exchange loss of $0.5
million and an income tax recovery of $0.3 million.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums
Gross premiums written decreased by $125.3 million, or 12.9%, for the six months ended June
30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in gross premiums written
was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
The non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which
included pricing and/or policy and contract terms and conditions), increased competition
and decreasing rates for new and renewal business in each of our operating segments. |
|
|
|
|
In our reinsurance segment, adjustments on estimated premiums were lower by $18.0
million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June
30, 2007. We recognized net downward adjustments of $8.0 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $10.0 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2007. Gross premiums written also decreased in our reinsurance
segment by approximately $12.0 million because some cedents purchased less reinsurance. |
|
|
|
|
In our property segment, we reduced the amount of gross premiums written in our
energy line of business by $17.6 million, or 33.1%, in response to deteriorating market
conditions. |
|
|
|
|
We also reduced the amount of gross premiums written for certain energy classes of
business within our casualty segment by $6.6 million in response to deteriorating market
conditions. |
The
table below illustrates our gross premiums written by geographic location for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Bermuda |
|
$ |
556.1 |
|
|
$ |
726.6 |
|
|
$ |
(170.5 |
) |
|
|
(23.5 |
)% |
United States |
|
|
145.1 |
|
|
|
89.1 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
Europe |
|
|
142.5 |
|
|
|
153.3 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
843.7 |
|
|
$ |
969.0 |
|
|
$ |
(125.3 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross premiums written for our Bermuda operations, in addition to the factors
discussed above, was due to the fact that certain policies and treaties that were previously
written in Bermuda during the six months ended June 30, 2007 were renewed in our U.S. companies
during the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our new U.S. reinsurance company commenced operations
in April 2008 and renewed treaties previously written in Bermuda
of $34.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Net premiums written decreased by $97.6 million, or 13.1%, for the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The difference between gross and net premiums
written is the cost to us of purchasing reinsurance, both on a proportional and a non-proportional
basis, including the cost of property catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We ceded 23.3% of gross
premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 23.2% for the same period in
2007.
Net premiums earned decreased by $47.8 million, or 8.1%, for the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 as a result of lower net premiums written. The
percentage decrease in net premiums earned was lower than that
-29-
of net premiums written due to the continued earning of higher net premiums that were written
prior to the six months ended June 30, 2008.
We evaluate our business by segment, distinguishing between property insurance, casualty
insurance and reinsurance. The following chart illustrates the mix of our business on both a gross
premiums written and net premiums earned basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Premiums |
|
Premiums |
|
|
Written |
|
Earned |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Property
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
Casualty
|
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
The increase in the percentage of casualty gross premiums written reflects the continued
growth of our U.S. operations, where casualty gross premiums written increased by $15.4 million, or
28.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Net Investment Income and Realized Investment Losses
Net investment income increased by $2.7 million, or 1.8%, for the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of an
increase in the dividend received from our global high-yield bond fund of $4.0 million, as well as
an approximate 4.1% increase in our average aggregate invested assets from June 30, 2007 to June
30, 2008. The dividend from the global high-yield bond fund increased from $2.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 to $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our aggregate
invested assets grew due to positive operating cash flows partially offset by funds used to acquire
our common shares from AIG in December 2007. For both the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
we incurred investment management fees of $3.0 million.
For both the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the annualized period book yield of the
investment portfolio was 4.7%. As of June 30, 2008, approximately 99% of our fixed income
investments (which included individually held securities and securities held in a global high-yield
bond fund) consisted of investment grade securities. The average credit rating of our fixed income
portfolio was AA+ as rated by Standard & Poors and Aa1 as rated by Moodys Investors Service, with
an average duration of approximately 3.4 years as of June 30, 2008.
Net realized investment losses decreased by $7.1 million, or 88.8%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net realized investment losses of
$0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
A write-down of approximately $37.3 million related to declines in the market value
of securities in our available for sale portfolio that were considered to be other than
temporary. The declines in market value of these securities were primarily due to the
write-down of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities due to the widening
of credit spreads caused by the continued decline in the U.S. housing market. All of
the residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities written down were AAA rated
securities. Given the current market environment for mortgage-backed securities, it is
difficult to determine when recovery will occur and as such we recorded an
other-than-temporary charge. Also included in the other-than-temporary impairment
charge during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was a write-down of $1.0 million
related to our investment in bonds issued by a commercial bank and a write down of $1.2
million of other invested assets. We performed an analysis of the issuers, including
their liquidity, business prospects and overall financial position and concluded that an
other-than-temporary charge should be recognized. |
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses of $11.9 million related to the mark-to-market of our
hedge fund investments. There were no realized investment gains or losses recognized
from our hedge fund investments during the six months ended June 30, 2007. |
-30-
|
|
|
Net realized investment gains of $48.3 million from the sale of securities. We sold
a number of securities during the six months ended June 30, 2008 to capitalize the
initial operations of our U.S. reinsurance platform and to fund the increased
capitalization of our direct U.S. operations and our European operations. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the net loss on fixed income investments included a
write-down of approximately $12.3 million related to declines in the market value of securities in
our available for sale portfolio that were considered to be other than temporary solely due to
changes in interest rates.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses
Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $20.6 million, or 6.0%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The primary reasons for the
reduction in these expenses were net favorable prior year reserve development and lower earned
premiums during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007,
partially offset by higher than expected loss activity for the current periods business.
We recorded net favorable reserve development related to prior years of approximately $92.9
million and $58.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve development
for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $33.2 million related to the 2005
windstorms, of which $10.5 million was recognized by our property segment and $22.7 million
was recognized by our reinsurance segment. We recognized the net favorable reserve
development for the 2005 windstorms due to less than anticipated reported loss activity
over the past several quarters. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2008, we estimated our net
losses related to Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma to be $387.7 million, which was a
reduction from our original estimate of $456.0 million. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $47.2 million was recognized by our casualty
segment primarily as a result of general casualty, professional liability and healthcare
lines of business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss
emergence for the 2002 through 2004 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $10.4 million, excluding the 2005 windstorms, was
recognized by our property segment primarily as a result of general property business
actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003,
2006 and 2007 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $2.1 million was recognized by our reinsurance
segment primarily due to favorable development in the 2007 loss year related to windstorm
Kyrill and the floods in the U.K. and Australia. |
The following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve
development for the six months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
Net favorable development of $29.7 million for our casualty segment, which consisted of
$107.6 million of favorable reserve development primarily related to low loss emergence in
our professional liability and healthcare lines of business for the 2003, 2004 and 2006
loss years and low loss emergence in our general casualty business for the 2004 loss year.
These favorable reserve developments were partially offset by $77.9 million of unfavorable
reserve development due to higher than anticipated loss emergence in our general casualty
line of business for the 2003 and 2005 loss years and our professional liability line of
business for the 2002 loss year. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $10.3 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our property segment which consisted of $27.5 million in favorable reserve
development that was primarily the result of general property business actual loss
emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 and 2006 loss
years, partially offset by unfavorable reserve development of $17.2 million that was
primarily the result of increased loss activity for our general property business for the
2004 and 2005 loss years and our energy business for the 2006 loss year. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $12.6 million related to Hurricanes Katrina, Rita
and Wilma. As of June 30, 2007, we estimated our net losses related to Hurricanes Katrina,
Rita and Wilma to be $443.4 million, which was a reduction from our original estimate of
$456.0 million. |
-31-
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $2.6 million related to the 2004 windstorms. This
included $1.0 million of additional recoveries under our property catastrophe reinsurance
protection related to Hurricane Frances and $1.6 million for our European property business
related to the 2004 windstorms. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $3.3 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our reinsurance segment comprised of $1.6 million related to low loss
emergence in our property reinsurance lines of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years
and $1.7 million related to low loss emergence in our accident and health reinsurance line
of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 59.3%, compared to
58.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development recognized in the
six months ended June 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 17.1 percentage points.
Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods business was 76.4%. Net
favorable reserve development recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2007 reduced the loss and
loss expense ratio by 9.9 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to that
periods business was 67.9%. The increase in the current years loss and loss expense ratio for
the current period was due to higher than expected reported loss activity and lower rates on new
and renewal business for each of our operating segments. During the six months ended June 30,
2008, we had exposure to a number of property losses that were higher
than normal, which included
fires, tornadoes, hail storms and floods in various regions of the United States and in other parts
of the world as well as the gas pipeline explosion in Australia.
The following table shows the components of the decrease in net losses and loss expenses of
$20.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net losses paid |
|
$ |
175.5 |
|
|
$ |
227.2 |
|
|
$ |
(51.7 |
) |
Net change in reported case reserves |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
39.3 |
|
Net change in IBNR |
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
117.5 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
321.6 |
|
|
$ |
342.2 |
|
|
$ |
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses paid have decreased $51.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily
due to lower claim payments relating to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms than the amount paid during
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and due to lower claim payments for our casualty segment.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, $26.3 million of net losses were paid in relation to the
2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to $58.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recovered $8.3 million on our property catastrophe
reinsurance protection in relation to losses paid as a result of the 2004 and 2005 windstorms
compared to $18.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in reported case
reserves is due to increased case reserves for our property and reinsurance segments partially
offset by lower case reserves for our casualty segment. The decrease in IBNR was primarily due to
net favorable loss reserve development and a reduction in business written, partially offset by
increased loss reserves for our current periods business.
-32-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
3,237.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,947.9 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
373.5 |
|
|
|
400.7 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(59.7 |
) |
|
|
(43.3 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
321.6 |
|
|
$ |
342.2 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
139.0 |
|
|
|
165.2 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
175.5 |
|
|
$ |
227.2 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
3,385.6 |
|
|
|
3,064.5 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
778.6 |
|
|
|
679.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
4,164.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,743.7 |
|
Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs decreased by $8.0 million, or 13.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Acquisition costs as a percentage of net premiums
earned were 9.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 10.4% for the same period in
2007. The decrease in this rate was primarily due to increased commissions received on ceded
reinsurance in our casualty segment.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $22.0 million, or 32.5%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The following is a breakdown of the major
factors contributing to the increase:
|
|
|
Salary and employee welfare costs increased by $13.2 million due to our average staff
count increasing by approximately 11.9%. This also included a one-time expense of $3.8
million for the reimbursement of stock compensation and signing bonuses for new executives
hired as a result of the continued expansion of our U.S. operations and increased
stock-based compensation costs of $1.9 million. |
|
|
|
|
Information technology costs increased by approximately $4.2 million due to consulting
costs required as part of the development of our technological infrastructure as well as an
increase in the cost of hardware and software. |
|
|
|
|
Professional fees increased by approximately $2.3 million due to increased legal and
other professional fees. |
|
|
|
|
Rent and related costs increased by approximately $1.8 million due to additional office
space in New York and Chicago and increased amortization of furniture and fixtures. There
was a gain of $0.6 million on the sale of fixed assets from our previous office space in
Bermuda during the six months ended June 30, 2007. No such gain on fixed assets occurred
during the six months ended June 30, 2008. |
-33-
Our general and administrative expense ratio was 16.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008,
which was higher than the 11.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily
due to the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned declined.
Our expense ratio was 26.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 21.9% for the
six months ended June 30, 2007. The increase resulted from increased general and administrative
expenses.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased by $0.1 million, or 0.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. Interest expense incurred during both the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 represented half of the annual interest expense on the senior
notes, which bear interest at an annual rate of 7.50%.
Net Income
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $210.2 million compared to net income of
$237.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily the result of
lower net premiums earned, increased general and administrative expenses and increased loss
activity for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008
included a net foreign exchange loss of $0.1 million and income tax recovery of $3.3 million. Net
income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 included a net foreign exchange loss of $0.5 million
and an income tax expense of $0.8 million.
Underwriting Results by Operating Segments
Our company is organized into three operating segments:
Property Segment. Our property segment provides direct coverage of physical property and
business interruption coverage for commercial property and energy-related risks. We write solely
commercial coverages and focus on the insurance of primary risk layers. This means that we are
typically part of the first group of insurers that cover a loss up to a specified limit.
Casualty Segment. Our casualty segment provides direct coverage for general and product
liability, professional liability and healthcare liability risks. We focus primarily on insurance
of excess layers, where we insure the second and/or subsequent layers of a policy above the primary
layer. Our direct casualty underwriters provide a variety of specialty insurance casualty products
to large and complex organizations around the world.
Reinsurance Segment. Our reinsurance segment includes the reinsurance of property, general
casualty, professional liability, specialty lines and property catastrophe coverages written by
other insurance companies. We presently write reinsurance on both a treaty and a facultative
basis, targeting several niche reinsurance markets including professional liability lines,
specialty casualty, property for U.S. regional insurers, accident and health and to a lesser extent
marine and aviation lines.
Property Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the property
segment for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
|
$ |
218.0 |
|
|
$ |
258.3 |
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
|
100.9 |
|
|
|
105.1 |
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses
|
|
$ |
62.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
|
$ |
77.3 |
|
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
Acquisition costs
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Underwriting (loss) income
|
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
35.5 |
|
-34-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Ratios |
|
($ in millions) |
Loss and loss expense ratio
|
|
|
141.7 |
% |
|
|
70.7 |
% |
|
|
88.1 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
General and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
159.8 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
109.8 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $24.5 million, or 15.7%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the
non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included pricing
and/or policy terms and conditions) and rate decreases from increased competition for new and
renewal business. In addition, we continued to reduce the amount of gross premiums written in our
energy line of business by $12.8 million, or 40.6%, in response to deteriorating market conditions.
We expect the trend of reducing our energy line of business to continue during the remainder of
the year.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
113.2 |
|
|
$ |
124.6 |
|
|
$ |
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
Energy |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
(40.6 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(75.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
|
$ |
(24.5 |
) |
|
|
(15.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased by $4.7 million, or 8.0%, for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. Overall, we ceded 58.9% of gross premiums
written for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 62.3% for the three months ended June
30, 2007. The decrease in the percentage of premiums ceded was caused by a reduction in the
cession percentage on our general property quota share reinsurance treaty from 55% to 40% and the
non-renewal of our energy quota share reinsurance treaty, which expired June 1, 2007, partially
offset by additional reinsurance protection purchased, which was as follows:
|
|
|
Renewed our property catastrophe reinsurance treaty, which resulted in ceded written
premiums of $26.1 million. The cost of the property catastrophe reinsurance treaty was
higher than the expiring treaty by approximately $7.0 million. The increased cost of
the property catastrophe reinsurance treaty is principally due to the new treaty
expanding earthquake coverage in the United States and increased exposure due to
changes in our general property quota share reinsurance treaty. |
|
|
|
|
Our international property catastrophe treaty was cancelled and rewritten effective
May 1, 2008. This treaty covers worldwide losses, excluding the United States and
Canada. The total ceded premiums written for the international property catastrophe
treaty were $2.0 million. There were no ceded premiums written related to the
international catastrophe property treaty during the six months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Purchased an excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty for our general property treaty with
a limit of $15 million excess of $10 million or
10 million excess of 10
million. The total ceded premiums written for the excess-of-loss
treaty were $3.4 million. There was no excess-of-loss treaty in place during the three months ended June
30, 2007. |
Net premiums earned decreased $4.1 million, or 8.5%, primarily due to lower net premiums
written. The percentage decrease in net premiums earned was lower than that of net premiums written
due to the continued earning of higher net premiums that were written prior to the three months
ended June 30, 2008.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $28.5 million, or
83.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The increase in net losses and loss expenses was primarily the result of higher than expected loss
activity for the current periods business partially offset by lower net premiums earned. During
the three
-35-
months ended June 30, 2008 our property segment recognized losses and loss expenses of $6.0
million related to the flooding in the U.S. Midwest and $30.0 million related to a gas pipeline
explosion in Australia. On June 3, 2008, a pipeline rupture and fire significantly reduced the
supply of natural gas to Western Australia. While not directly exposed to the pipeline, we provide
business interruption protection as part of our property coverage to other large institutional
businesses that depend on the natural gas produced through the pipeline. The losses from the gas
pipeline explosion are in the very early stages and we will continue to monitor our reserve for
losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and adjust our reserve for losses and loss
expenses accordingly.
Overall, our property segment recorded net unfavorable reserve development of $0.2 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to net unfavorable reserve development of $1.3
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The $1.3 million of net unfavorable reserve development during the three months ended June 30,
2007 included the following:
|
|
|
Net unfavorable reserve development of $2.9 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our property segment was comprised of $16.0 million of unfavorable reserve
development, which primarily related to higher loss emergence than expected in our general
property line of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years and in our energy line of
business for the 2006 loss year, and which was partially offset by $13.1 million of
favorable reserve development primarily in our general property line of business for the
2003 and 2006 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
The net favorable reserve development of $1.6 million for our European property business
related to the 2004 windstorms. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 141.7% compared
to 70.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net unfavorable reserve development recognized
in the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased the loss and loss expense ratio by 0.5%. Thus,
the loss and loss expense ratio for this periods business was 141.2%. In comparison, net
unfavorable reserve development recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2007 increased the
loss and loss expense ratio by 2.7 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio for
that periods business was 68.0%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current
periods business was due to higher than expected reported loss activity in the current period
primarily caused by $6.0 million in net losses and loss expense recognized related to the U.S.
Midwest floods and $30.0 million in net losses and loss expenses recognized related to the gas
pipeline explosion in Australia.
Net paid losses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $31.2 million and
$40.9 million, respectively. The decrease in paid losses was due to lower net paid losses related
to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, approximately
$2.0 million of net losses were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to
approximately $14.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
325.8 |
|
|
$ |
381.6 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
62.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.9 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve
for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
358.1 |
|
|
|
375.9 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
361.8 |
|
|
|
431.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
719.9 |
|
|
$ |
807.4 |
|
-36-
Acquisition
costs. Acquisition costs decreased by $3.1 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007. The decrease is primarily caused by an increase in ceding
commission percentage on our general property quota share treaty and an adjustment for outstanding
commissions payable. The acquisition cost ratio decreased to negative 6.7% for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 from 0.2% for the same period in 2007. The factors that will determine the
amount of acquisition costs going forward are the amount of brokerage fees and commissions incurred
on policies we write less ceding commissions earned on reinsurance we purchase. We normally
negotiate our reinsurance treaties on an annual basis, so the ceding commission rates and amounts
ceded will vary from renewal period to renewal period.
General and administrative expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased by
$2.8 million, or 34.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to three months ended
June 30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to increased
salary and employee welfare costs, increased building-related costs, increased professional fees
and higher costs associated with information technology. The increase in the general and
administrative expense ratio from 16.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 to 24.8% for the
same period in 2008 was the result of the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned
declined.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $40.3 million, or 15.6%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the
non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included pricing
and/or policy terms and conditions) and rate decreases from increased competition for new and
renewal business. In addition, we have continued to reduce the amount of gross premiums written in
our energy line of business by $17.6 million, or 33.1%, in response to deteriorating market
conditions. We expect the trend of reducing our energy line of business to continue during the
remainder of the year.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
182.1 |
|
|
$ |
204.5 |
|
|
$ |
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
)% |
Energy |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
(17.6 |
) |
|
|
(33.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(50.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
218.0 |
|
|
$ |
258.3 |
|
|
$ |
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
(15.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased by $4.2 million, or 4.0%, for the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. This was primarily the result of lower gross
premiums written partially offset by the changes to our reinsurance program discussed in the
comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2008. Overall, we ceded 53.7% of gross premiums
written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 59.3% for the six months ended June 30,
2007.
Net premiums earned decreased $5.1 million, or 5.5%, primarily due to lower net premiums
written. The percentage decrease in net premiums earned was lower than that of net premiums written
due to the continued earning of higher net premiums that were written prior to the three months
ended June 30, 2008.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $36.3 million, or
88.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
increase in net losses and loss expenses was primarily the result of higher than expected loss
activity for the current periods business partially offset by lower net premiums earned. Loss
activity in the current periods business included $6.0 million and $30.0 million in losses and
loss expenses recognized related to the flooding in the U.S. Midwest and the gas pipeline explosion
in Australia, respectively.
Overall, our property segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $20.9 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to net favorable reserve development of $24.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The $20.9 million of net favorable reserve development during the six months ended June 30,
2008 included the following:
-37-
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $10.5 million related to the 2005 windstorms due to
less than anticipated reported loss activity over the past several quarters. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $10.4 million, excluding the 2005 windstorms,
primarily the result of general property business actual loss emergence being lower than
the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003, 2006 and 2007 loss years. |
The $24.4 million of net favorable reserve development during the six months ended June 30,
2007 included the following:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $10.3 million, excluding 2004 and 2005 windstorms,
for our property segment which consisted of $27.5 million in net favorable reserve
development primarily the result of general property business actual loss emergence being
lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 and 2006 loss years, partially
offset by unfavorable reserve development of $17.2 million primarily the result of
increased loss activity for our general property business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years
and our energy business for the 2006 loss year. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $8.7 million for Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and
Wilma. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $5.4 million related to the 2004 windstorms. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 88.1% compared to
44.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development recognized in the
six months ended June 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 23.8 percentage points.
Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods business was 111.9%. In
comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2007
decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 26.2 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss
expense ratio for that periods business was 70.4%. The increase in the loss and loss expense
ratio for the current periods business was due to higher than expected reported loss activity in
the current period as well as lower rates on new and renewal business. During the six months
ended June 30, 2008, we had exposure to a number of property
losses that were higher than normal,
which included fires, tornadoes, hail storms and floods in various regions of the United States and
in other parts of the world as well as the gas pipeline explosion in Australia.
Net paid losses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were $82.3 million and
$90.6 million, respectively. The decrease in paid losses was due to lower net paid losses related
to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, approximately
$11.2 million of net losses were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to
approximately $38.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
360.6 |
|
|
$ |
423.9 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
62.2 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
77.3 |
|
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
49.1 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
82.3 |
|
|
$ |
90.6 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
358.1 |
|
|
|
375.9 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
361.8 |
|
|
|
431.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
719.9 |
|
|
$ |
807.4 |
|
-38-
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased by $2.8 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007 primarily due to an increase in ceding commission percentage on
our general property quota share treaty and an adjustment for outstanding commissions payable. The
acquisition cost ratio decreased to negative 2.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 0.4%
for the same period in 2007.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by
$5.5 million, or 34.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to six months ended June
30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to increased salary
and employee welfare costs including a one-time expense of $0.5 million for the reimbursement of
stock compensation and signing bonuses for new executives hired as a result of the continued
expansion of our U.S. operations, increased building-related costs, increased professional fees and
higher costs associated with information technology. The increase in the general and
administrative expense ratio from 17.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to 24.5% for the
same period in 2008 was the result of the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned
declined.
Casualty Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the casualty
segment for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
178.2 |
|
|
$ |
188.1 |
|
|
$ |
299.3 |
|
|
$ |
313.3 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
129.3 |
|
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
220.0 |
|
|
|
242.3 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
123.7 |
|
|
|
214.8 |
|
|
|
248.1 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
114.9 |
|
|
$ |
151.3 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
49.2 |
% |
|
|
53.5 |
% |
|
|
61.0 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
|
|
|
78.3 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $9.9 million, or 5.3%, for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the
non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included pricing
and/or policy terms and conditions) and rate decreases from increased competition for new and
renewal business. This was most noticeable for our Bermuda operations where gross premiums written
decreased $21.8 million, or 17.4%. We also reduced the amount of gross premiums written for
certain energy classes of business by $6.4 million in response to deteriorating market conditions.
These reductions were partially offset by an increase in the amount of business written through our
U.S. offices as a result of the continued expansion of our U.S. operations. Gross premiums written
by our U.S. operations increased $9.9 million, or 32.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
89.5 |
|
|
$ |
89.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
General casualty |
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
|
83.6 |
|
|
|
(17.0 |
) |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
165.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
178.2 |
|
|
$ |
188.1 |
|
|
$ |
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-39-
Net premiums written decreased $12.3 million, or 8.7%, for the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in net premiums written was
greater than the decrease in gross premiums written. This was due to an increase in reinsurance
purchased on our casualty business for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007. We ceded 27.4% of gross premiums written for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to 24.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The percentage of premiums ceded were
higher for each of our lines of business during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2007. Net premiums earned decreased $18.1 million, or 14.6%, due
to lower gross premiums written and increased reinsurance utilization.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $19.1 million, or
31.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable reserve
development recognized and the reduction in net premiums earned. Overall, our casualty segment
recorded net favorable reserve development of $38.0 million during the three months ended June 30,
2008 compared to net favorable reserve development of $30.4 million for the three months ended June
30, 2007.
The net favorable reserve development of $38.0 million recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 was primarily as a result of general casualty, professional liability and
healthcare lines of business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss
emergence for the 2002 through 2004 loss years. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we
adjusted our weighting on actuarial methods utilized for these lines of business and loss years
from using the expected loss ratio method to a blend of the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported loss
method and the expected loss ratio method. Placing greater reliance on more responsive actuarial
methods for certain lines of business and loss years within our casualty segment is a natural
progression as we mature as a company and gain sufficient historical experience of our own that
allows us to further refine our estimate of the reserve for losses and loss expenses.
The $30.4 million net favorable reserve development during the three months ended June 30,
2007 included the following:
|
|
|
Favorable reserve development of $74.8 million primarily related to low loss emergence
in our professional liability and healthcare lines of business for the 2003, 2004 and 2006
loss years and general casualty line of business for the 2004 loss year. |
|
|
|
|
This was partially offset by $46.7 million of unfavorable reserve development due
primarily to higher than anticipated loss emergence in our general casualty line of
business for the 2003 and 2005 loss years. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 39.5%, compared
to 49.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The net favorable reserve development
recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2008 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by
36.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods
business was 75.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Comparatively, the net favorable
reserve development recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2007 decreased the loss and
loss expense ratio by 24.6 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to
that periods business was 73.8%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current
periods business was due to lower rates on new and renewal policies.
We continue to review the impact of the subprime and credit related downturn on professional
liability insurance policies we write. We have high attachment points for our professional
liability policies, which makes estimating whether losses will exceed our attachment point more
difficult. Based on claims information received to date and our analysis, the average attachment
point for our professional liability policies with potential subprime and credit related exposure
is approximately $131 million with average limits of $12 million (gross of reinsurance). Our
direct insurance polices with subprime and credit related loss notices may have the benefit of
facultative reinsurance, treaty reinsurance or a combination of both. At this time we believe,
based on the claims information received to date, that our current IBNR is adequate to meet any
potential subprime and credit related losses. As of June 30, 2008, we have recorded a case reserve
of $5.0 million for subprime and credit related losses. We will continue to monitor our reserve
for losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and adjust our reserve for losses and
loss expenses accordingly.
Net paid losses were $19.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
$37.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease is due to the timing of
payments of claims that have already been reserved for in prior periods.
-40-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
1,937.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,758.3 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
91.3 |
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(38.0 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
37.0 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,959.6 |
|
|
|
1,782.2 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
407.3 |
|
|
|
220.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
2,366.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,002.2 |
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs increased $0.2 million, or 4.0%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily
related to increased premium taxes and broker commissions partially offset by lower gross premiums
written and an increase in ceding commission income with the increase in reinsurance we purchased.
The increase in the acquisition cost ratio from 4.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 to
5.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was due to the factors discussed above.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $7.6
million, or 45.5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June
30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to increased salary
and related costs, increased building-related costs, increased professional fees and higher costs
associated with information technology. The 9.5 percentage point increase in the general and
administrative expense ratio from 13.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 to 23.0% for the
same period in 2008 was primarily a result of the factors discussed above, while net premiums
earned declined.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $14.0 million, or 4.5%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the
non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included pricing
and/or policy terms and conditions) and rate decreases from increased competition for new and
renewal business. This was most noticeable for our Bermuda operations where gross premiums written
decreased $27.1 million, or 13.8%. We also reduced the amount of gross premiums written for certain
energy classes of business by $6.6 million in response to deteriorating market conditions. These
reductions were partially offset by an increase in the amount of business written through our
U.S. offices as a result of the continued expansion of our U.S. operations. Gross premiums written
by our U.S. operations increased $15.4 million, or 28.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007.
-41-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
140.6 |
|
|
$ |
145.3 |
|
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
General casualty |
|
|
108.0 |
|
|
|
134.2 |
|
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
208.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
299.3 |
|
|
$ |
313.3 |
|
|
$ |
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased $22.3 million, or 9.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in net premiums written was greater
than the decrease in gross premiums written. This was due to an increase in reinsurance purchased
on our casualty business for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007. We ceded 26.5% of gross premiums written for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
22.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The percentage of premiums ceded were higher for
each of our lines of business during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2007. Net premiums earned decreased $33.3 million, or 13.4%, due to lower gross
premiums written and increased reinsurance utilization.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $36.4 million, or
24.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable reserve
development recognized and the reduction in net premiums earned. Overall, our casualty segment
recorded net favorable reserve development of $47.2 million during the six months ended June 30,
2008 compared to net favorable reserve development of $29.7 million for the six months ended June
30, 2007.
The net favorable reserve development of $47.2 million recognized during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 was primarily as a result of general casualty, professional liability and healthcare
lines of business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for
the 2002 through 2004 loss years.
The $29.7 million net favorable reserve development during the six months ended June 30, 2007
included the following:
|
|
|
Favorable reserve development of $107.6 million related to low loss emergence primarily
in our professional liability and healthcare lines of business for the 2003, 2004 and 2006
loss years and general casualty line of business for the 2004 loss year. |
|
|
|
|
This was partially offset by $77.9 million of unfavorable reserve development due to
higher than anticipated loss emergence in our general casualty line of business for the
2003 and 2005 loss years and in our professional liability line for the 2002 loss year. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 53.5%, compared to
61.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The net favorable reserve development recognized
during the six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by
22.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods
business was 75.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Comparatively, the net favorable
reserve development recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2007 decreased the loss and
loss expense ratio by 12.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to
that periods business was 73.0%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current
periods business was due to lower rates on new and renewal policies.
Net paid losses were $33.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
$60.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease is due to the timing of
payments of claims that have already been reserved for in prior periods.
-42-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,878.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,691.2 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
162.1 |
|
|
|
181.0 |
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(47.2 |
) |
|
|
(29.7 |
) |
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
114.9 |
|
|
$ |
151.3 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
|
$ |
60.3 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,959.6 |
|
|
|
1,782.2 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
407.3 |
|
|
|
220.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
2,366.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,002.2 |
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased $2.6 million, or 23.4%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily
related to lower gross premiums written and an increase in ceding commission income with the
increase in reinsurance we purchased. The decrease in the acquisition cost ratio from 4.4% for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 to 4.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was due to the
increase in ceding commission received partially offset by increased premium taxes and broker
commissions.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $16.0
million, or 50.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to increased salary and
related costs including a one-time expense of $2.1 million for the reimbursement of stock
compensation and signing bonuses for new executives hired as a result of the continued expansion of
our U.S. operations, increased building-related costs, increased professional fees and higher costs
associated with information technology. The 9.5 percentage point increase in the general and
administrative expense ratio from 12.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to 22.4% for the
same period in 2008 was primarily a result of the factors discussed above, while net premiums
earned declined.
-43-
Reinsurance Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the
reinsurance segment for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
$ |
186.0 |
|
|
$ |
326.4 |
|
|
$ |
397.3 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
136.6 |
|
|
|
186.0 |
|
|
|
326.0 |
|
|
|
397.1 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
119.1 |
|
|
|
131.1 |
|
|
|
239.5 |
|
|
|
248.8 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
73.7 |
|
|
$ |
81.2 |
|
|
$ |
129.4 |
|
|
$ |
149.9 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
54.0 |
% |
|
|
60.3 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
89.6 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $49.4 million, or 26.6%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease in gross premiums written
was primarily due to non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which
included pricing and/or contract terms and conditions), rate decreases from increased competition
for new and renewal business, net downward adjustments on estimated premiums and some cedents
purchased less reinsurance. Adjustments on estimated premiums
were lower by $17.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2007. We recognized net downward adjustments of $5.9 million during the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $11.1 million during the
three months ended June 30, 2007. Given declining market rates, actual premiums are lower than the
estimated premiums thus resulting in downward premium adjustments during the three months ended
June 30, 2008. As our historical experience develops, we may have fewer or smaller adjustments to
our estimated premiums. The impact of some cedents purchasing less
reinsurance resulted in lower gross premiums written of approximately $7.0 million. During the
three months ended June 30, 2008, our Bermuda and U.S. reinsurance operations wrote gross premiums
written of $93.0 million and $43.6 million, respectively. The gross premiums written by our U.S.
reinsurance operations, which commenced business in April 2008, included the renewal of certain
treaties previously written in Bermuda of $34.9 million.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
International reinsurance |
|
$ |
40.7 |
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
% |
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
(19.7 |
) |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
Property reinsurance |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(24.3 |
) |
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
(21.9 |
) |
|
|
(44.8 |
) |
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(55.6 |
) |
Other |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
136.6 |
|
|
$ |
186.0 |
|
|
$ |
(49.4 |
) |
|
|
(26.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased by $49.4 million, or 26.6%, which was consistent with the
decrease in gross premiums written. Net premiums earned decreased $12.0 million, or 9.2%,
primarily as a result of lower net premiums written. Premiums related to our
-44-
reinsurance business earn at a slower rate than those related to our direct insurance
business. Direct insurance premiums typically earn ratably over the term of a policy. Reinsurance
premiums under a proportional contract are typically earned over the same period as the underlying
policies, or risks, covered by the contract. As a result, the earning pattern of a proportional
contract may extend up to 24 months, reflecting the inception dates of the underlying policies.
Property catastrophe premiums and premiums for other treaties written on a losses occurring basis
earn ratably over the term of the reinsurance contract.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $7.5 million, or
9.2%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
The decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to lower net premiums earned
partially offset by lower net favorable reserve development recognized during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. During the three months
ended June 30, 2008, we recognized net favorable reserve development of $2.0 million due to
favorable development in the 2007 loss year related to windstorm Kyrill and the floods in the U.K.
and Australia. Comparatively, we recorded net favorable reserve development of approximately
$3.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007 consisting of $1.6 million related to low
loss emergence in our property reinsurance lines of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years and
$1.7 million related to low loss emergence in our accident and health reinsurance line of business
for the 2004 and 2005 loss years.
The loss and loss expense ratio was 61.9% for both the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007. Net favorable development recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2008 reduced the
loss and loss expense ratio by 1.7 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio
related to the current periods business was 63.6%. In comparison, net favorable loss development
recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2007 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by
2.5 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to that periods business was
64.4%. Included in the current periods business were net incurred losses and loss expenses of $5.0
million related to the flooding in the U.S. Midwest. Comparatively during the three months ended
June 30, 2007, we recognized net losses and loss expenses of $9.0 million related to the floods in
the U.K. and Australia.
We continue to review the impact of the subprime and credit related downturn on professional
liability reinsurance contracts we write. We have high attachment points for our professional
liability contracts, which makes estimating whether losses will exceed our attachment point more
difficult. Based on claims information received to date and our analysis, the average attachment
point for our professional liability reinsurance contracts with potential subprime and credit
related exposure is approximately $99 million with average limits of $1.7 million. At this time we
believe, based on the claims information received to date, that our current IBNR is adequate to meet any
potential subprime and credit related losses. As of June 30, 2008, we have recorded a case reserve
of $7.5 million for subprime and credit related losses. We will continue to monitor our reserve
for losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and adjust our reserve for losses and
loss expenses accordingly.
Net paid losses were $32.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
$30.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase in paid losses was due to
higher net paid losses related to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms. During the three months ended June
30, 2008, approximately $10.6 million of net losses were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005
windstorms compared to approximately $8.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
-45-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months June 30, |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, April 1 |
|
$ |
1,026.3 |
|
|
$ |
855.2 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
73.7 |
|
|
$ |
81.2 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,067.9 |
|
|
|
906.4 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
1,077.3 |
|
|
$ |
934.1 |
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased by $2.7 million, or 10.1%, for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as a result
of the related decrease in net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio of 20.2% for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 was in line with the 20.4% acquisition cost ratio for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2007.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $1.5
million, or 15.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June
30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to increased salary
and related costs including a one-time expense of $0.5 million for the reimbursement of stock
compensation for new executives hired as a result of the build-out of our U.S. reinsurance
operations, increased building-related costs, increased professional fees and higher costs
associated with information technology. The 2.0 percentage point increase in the general and
administrative expense ratio from 7.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 to 9.3% for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily a result of the factors discussed above, while net
premiums earned declined.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $70.9 million, or 17.8%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease in gross premiums written was
primarily due to non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which
included pricing and/or contract terms and conditions), rate decreases from increased competition
for new and renewal business, net downward adjustments on estimated
premiums and some cedents purchased less reinsurance. Adjustments on estimated premiums
were lower by $18.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2007. We recognized net downward adjustments of $8.0 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $10.0 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2007. The impact of some cedents purchasing less
reinsurance resulted in lower gross premiums written of approximately $12.0 million.
-46-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
$ |
108.0 |
|
|
$ |
146.7 |
|
|
$ |
(38.7 |
) |
|
|
(26.4 |
)% |
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
(26.4 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Property reinsurance |
|
|
55.1 |
|
|
|
63.6 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(32.5 |
) |
Other |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
326.4 |
|
|
$ |
397.3 |
|
|
$ |
(70.9 |
) |
|
|
(17.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased by $71.1 million, or 17.9%, which was consistent with the
decrease in gross premiums written. Net premiums earned decreased $9.3 million, or 3.7%, as a
result of lower net premiums written.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $20.5 million, or
13.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007. The
decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable reserve
development recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized net favorable reserve
development of $24.8 million, which included net favorable reserve development of $22.7 million for
the 2005 windstorms, and net favorable reserve development of $2.1 million primarily due to
favorable development in the 2007 loss year related to windstorm Kyrill and the floods in the U.K.
and Australia. We recognized net favorable reserve development of approximately $4.4 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2007, which included net favorable reserve development of
approximately $1.1 million related to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms. The remaining net favorable
reserve development of $3.3 million was comprised of $1.6 million related to low loss emergence in
our property reinsurance lines of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years and $1.7 million
related to low loss emergence in our accident and health reinsurance line of business for the 2004
and 2005 loss years.
The loss and loss expense ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 54.0% compared to
60.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development recognized during
the six months ended June 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 10.4 percentage
points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods business was 64.4%.
In comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2007
reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 1.8 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense
ratio related to that periods business was 62.1%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio
for the current periods business was due to lower rates on new and renewal contracts, and higher
than expected reported loss activity including $5.0 million in net losses and loss expenses
recognized related to the floods in the U.S. Midwest.
Net paid losses were $59.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to
$76.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease reflects lower net losses paid
in relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms from $20.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 to $15.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and lower losses paid for our property
treaty line of business.
-47-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are reflected
net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
998.2 |
|
|
$ |
832.8 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
149.2 |
|
|
|
154.3 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
129.4 |
|
|
$ |
149.9 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
55.8 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
59.7 |
|
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
|
1,067.9 |
|
|
|
906.4 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, June 30 |
|
$ |
1,077.3 |
|
|
$ |
934.1 |
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased by $2.6 million, or 5.2%, for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily as a result of the
related decrease in net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio of 19.6% for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 was in line with the 19.9% acquisition cost ratio for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2007.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $0.5
million, or 2.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the six months ended June 30,
2007. The increase was primarily the result of a one-time expense of $1.2 million for the
reimbursement of stock compensation and signing bonuses for new executives hired as a result of the
continued expansion of our U.S. operations and increased building-related costs, increased
professional fees and higher costs associated with information technology partially offset by lower
salary and related costs. The 0.5 percentage point increase in the general and administrative
expense ratio from 7.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to 8.4% for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 was primarily a result of the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned
decreased.
Reserves for Losses and Loss Expenses
Reserves for losses and loss expenses as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were comprised
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Case reserves |
|
$ |
444.3 |
|
|
$ |
480.0 |
|
|
$ |
350.9 |
|
|
$ |
270.7 |
|
|
$ |
239.0 |
|
|
$ |
212.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,034.3 |
|
|
$ |
963.4 |
|
IBNR |
|
|
275.6 |
|
|
|
280.7 |
|
|
|
2,016.0 |
|
|
|
1,872.0 |
|
|
|
838.3 |
|
|
|
803.7 |
|
|
|
3,129.9 |
|
|
|
2,956.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses
and loss expenses |
|
|
719.9 |
|
|
|
760.7 |
|
|
|
2,366.9 |
|
|
|
2,142.7 |
|
|
|
1,077.3 |
|
|
|
1,016.4 |
|
|
|
4,164.2 |
|
|
|
3,919.8 |
|
Reinsurance
recoverables |
|
|
(361.8 |
) |
|
|
(400.1 |
) |
|
|
(407.3 |
) |
|
|
(264.5 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
(778.6 |
) |
|
|
(682.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for
losses and loss
expenses |
|
$ |
358.1 |
|
|
$ |
360.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,959.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,878.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,067.9 |
|
|
$ |
998.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,385.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,237.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the increase in reserves for losses and loss expenses for the casualty segment
from December 31, 2007 to June 30, 2008 was the reserves for losses and loss expenses assumed in
connection with the acquisition of Finial Insurance Company, now known as Allied World Reinsurance
Company. As a part of the acquisition, we assumed case reserves of $56.4 million and IBNR of $48.5
million. The case reserves and IBNR assumed were 100% ceded to National Indemnity Company, an
affiliate of Berkshire
-48-
Hathaway Inc., resulting in an increase of $104.9 million in reinsurance recoverables. Please
refer to Note 4 of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
additional information regarding the acquisition of Finial Insurance
Company. As of June 30, 2008, the case reserves and IBNR assumed from Finial Insurance Company were $56.4 million and $44.8
million, respectively.
We participate in certain lines of business where claims may not be reported for many years.
Accordingly, management does not solely rely upon reported claims on these lines for estimating
ultimate liabilities. As such, we also use statistical and actuarial methods to estimate expected
ultimate losses and loss expenses. Loss reserves do not represent an exact calculation of
liability. Rather, loss reserves are estimates of what we expect the ultimate resolution and
administration of claims will cost. These estimates are based on various factors including
underwriters expectations about loss experience, actuarial analysis, comparisons with the results
of industry benchmarks and loss experience to date. Loss reserve estimates are refined as
experience develops and as claims are reported and resolved. Establishing an appropriate level of
loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process. Ultimate losses and loss expenses may differ
from our reserves, possibly by material amounts.
The following tables provide our ranges of loss and loss expense reserve estimates by business
segment as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for Losses and Loss Expenses |
|
|
Gross of Reinsurance Recoverable(1) |
|
|
Carried |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
|
Reserves |
|
Estimate |
|
Estimate |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Property |
|
$ |
719.9 |
|
|
$ |
549.0 |
|
|
$ |
881.5 |
|
Casualty |
|
|
2,366.9 |
|
|
|
1,717.6 |
|
|
|
2,680.4 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
1,077.3 |
|
|
|
784.7 |
|
|
|
1,352.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for Losses and Loss Expenses |
|
|
Net of Reinsurance Recoverable(1) |
|
|
Carried |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
|
Reserves |
|
Estimate |
|
Estimate |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Property |
|
$ |
358.1 |
|
|
$ |
266.4 |
|
|
$ |
450.2 |
|
Casualty |
|
|
1,959.6 |
|
|
|
1,388.8 |
|
|
|
2,233.3 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
1,067.9 |
|
|
|
776.1 |
|
|
|
1,343.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For statistical reasons, it is not appropriate to add together the ranges of each
business segment in an effort to determine the low and high range around the consolidated
loss reserves. |
Our range for each business segment was determined by utilizing multiple actuarial loss
reserving methods along with various assumptions of reporting patterns and expected loss ratios by
loss year. The various outcomes of these techniques were combined to determine a reasonable range
of required loss and loss expense reserves.
Our selection of the actual carried reserves has typically been above the midpoint of the
range. We believe that we should be conservative in our reserving practices due to the lengthy
reporting patterns and relatively large limits of net liability for any one risk of our direct
excess casualty business and of our casualty reinsurance business. Thus, due to this uncertainty
regarding estimates for reserve for losses and loss expenses, we have historically carried our
consolidated reserve for losses and loss expenses, net of reinsurance recoverable, above the
midpoint of the low and high estimates for the consolidated net losses and loss expenses. These
long-tail lines of business include our entire casualty segment, as well as the general casualty,
professional liability, facultative casualty and the international casualty components of our
reinsurance segment. We believe that relying on the more conservative actuarial indications for
these lines of business is prudent for a relatively new company. For a discussion of loss and loss
expense reserve estimate, please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of OperationsCritical Accounting PoliciesReserve for Losses and Loss Expenses in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2008.
-49-
Reinsurance Recoverable
The following table illustrates our reinsurance recoverable as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance Recoverable |
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
Jun. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Ceded case reserves |
|
$ |
320.8 |
|
|
$ |
289.2 |
|
Ceded IBNR reserves |
|
|
457.8 |
|
|
|
393.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
$ |
778.6 |
|
|
$ |
682.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the increase in ceded case reserves and ceded IBNR from December 31, 2007 to June
30, 2008 was the reinsurance recoverable recorded for the reserves assumed as a part of the
acquisition of Finial Insurance Company. As a part of the acquisition, we assumed case reserves of
$56.4 million and IBNR of $48.5 million. The case reserves and IBNR assumed were 100% ceded to
National Indemnity Company, resulting in additional reinsurance recoverables of $104.9 million.
Please refer to Note 4 of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
for additional information regarding the acquisition of Finial Insurance Company. As of June 30,
2008, the reinsurance recoverables from National Indemnity Company were $101.2 million. We remain
obligated for amounts ceded in the event our reinsurers do not meet their obligations.
Accordingly, we have evaluated the reinsurers that are providing reinsurance protection to us and
will continue to monitor their credit ratings and financial stability. We generally have the right
to terminate our treaty reinsurance contracts at any time, upon prior written notice to the
reinsurer, under specified circumstances, including the assignment to the reinsurer by A.M. Best of
a financial strength rating of less than A-. Approximately 98% of ceded case reserves as of June
30, 2008 were recoverable from reinsurers who had an A.M. Best rating of A- or higher.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
As of June 30, 2008, our shareholders equity was $2.4 billion, a 6.2% increase compared to
$2.2 billion as of December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of net income for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 of $210.2 million partially offset by unrealized losses of
$70.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008. On January 1, 2008, we adopted FAS 159
and elected the fair value option for our hedge fund investments. Upon adoption of FAS 159, we
reclassified the net unrealized gain related to the hedge funds of $26.3 million from accumulated
other comprehensive income and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment in retained earnings. Any
subsequent change in the fair value of our hedge fund investments will be recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and included in net realized
investment gains (losses). Please refer to Note 7 of the notes to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements regarding our adoption of FAS 159.
Holdings is a holding company and transacts no business of its own. Cash flows to Holdings
may comprise dividends, advances and loans from its subsidiary companies. Holdings is therefore
reliant on receiving dividends and other permitted distributions from its subsidiaries to make
principal, interest and/or dividend payments on its senior notes and common shares.
Restrictions and Specific Requirements
The jurisdictions in which our insurance subsidiaries are licensed to write business impose
regulations requiring companies to maintain or meet various defined statutory ratios, including
solvency and liquidity requirements. Some jurisdictions also place restrictions on the declaration
and payment of dividends and other distributions.
The payment of dividends from Holdings Bermuda domiciled insurance subsidiary is, under
certain circumstances, limited under Bermuda law, which requires our Bermuda insurance subsidiary
to maintain certain measures of solvency and liquidity. Holdings
-50-
U.S. domiciled subsidiaries are subject to significant regulatory restrictions limiting their
ability to declare and pay dividends. In particular, payments of dividends by Allied World
Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc., Allied World National Assurance Company and Allied World Reinsurance
Company are subject to restrictions on statutory surplus pursuant to Delaware law, New Hampshire
law and New Jersey law, respectively. Each state requires prior regulatory approval of any payment
of extraordinary dividends. In addition, Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited and
Allied World Assurance Company (Reinsurance) Limited are subject to significant regulatory
restrictions limiting their ability to declare and pay any dividends without the consent of the
Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority. We
also have insurance subsidiaries that are the parent company for other insurance subsidiaries, which
means that dividends and other distributions will be subject to multiple layers of regulations as
funds are pushed up to Holdings. The inability of the subsidiaries of Holdings to pay dividends
and other permitted distributions could have a material adverse effect on Holdings cash
requirements and ability to make principal, interest and dividend payments on its senior notes and
common shares.
Holdings insurance subsidiary in Bermuda, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd, is neither
licensed nor admitted as an insurer, nor is it accredited as a reinsurer, in any jurisdiction in
the United States. As a result, it is required to post collateral security with respect to any
reinsurance liabilities it assumes from ceding insurers domiciled in the United States in order for
U.S. ceding companies to obtain credit on their U.S. statutory financial statements with respect to
insurance liabilities ceded to them. Under applicable statutory provisions, the security
arrangements may be in the form of letters of credit, reinsurance trusts maintained by trustees or
funds-withheld arrangements where assets are held by the ceding company.
At this time, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd uses trust accounts primarily to meet
security requirements for inter-company and certain related-party reinsurance transactions. We
also have cash and cash equivalents and investments on deposit with various state or government
insurance departments or pledged in favor of ceding companies in order to comply with relevant
insurance regulations. As of June 30, 2008, total trust account deposits were $735.8 million
compared to $802.7 million as of December 31, 2007. In addition, Allied World Assurance Company,
Ltd currently has access to up to $1.55 billion in letters of credit under two letter of credit
facilities, one with Citibank Europe plc and one with a syndication of lenders described below.
These facilities are used to provide security to reinsureds and are collateralized by us, at least
to the extent of letters of credit outstanding at any given time. As of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, there were outstanding letters of credit totaling $887.0 million and
$922.2 million, respectively, under the two facilities. Collateral committed to support the letter
of credit facilities was $1,188.9 million as of June 30, 2008, compared to $1,170.7 million as of
December 31, 2007.
In November 2007, we entered into a $800 million five-year senior credit facility (the
Facility) with a syndication of lenders. The Facility consists of a $400 million secured letter
of credit facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit (the Secured Facility) and a
$400 million unsecured facility for the making of revolving loans and for the issuance of standby
letters of credit (the Unsecured Facility). Both the Secured Facility and the Unsecured Facility
have options to increase the aggregate commitments by up to $200 million, subject to approval of
the lenders. The Facility will be used for general corporate purposes and to issue standby letters
of credit. The Facility contains representations, warranties and covenants customary for similar
bank loan facilities, including a covenant to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to
total capitalization as of the last day of each fiscal quarter or fiscal year of not greater than
0.35 to 1.0 and a covenant under the Unsecured Facility to maintain a certain consolidated net
worth. In addition, each material insurance subsidiary must maintain a financial strength rating
from A.M Best Company of at least A- under the Unsecured Facility and of at least B++ under the
Secured Facility. Concurrent with this new Facility, we terminated the Letter of Credit Facility
with Barclays Bank PLC and all outstanding letters of credit issued thereunder were transferred to
the Secured Facility. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Facility as of June 30,
2008.
Security arrangements with ceding insurers may subject our assets to security interests or
require that a portion of our assets be pledged to, or otherwise held by, third parties. Both of
our letter of credit facilities are fully collateralized by assets held in custodial accounts at
the Bank of New York Mellon held for the benefit of the banks. Although the investment income
derived from our assets while held in trust accrues to our benefit, the investment of these assets
is governed by the terms of the letter of credit facilities or the investment regulations of the
state or territory of domicile of the ceding insurer, which may be more restrictive than the
investment regulations applicable to us under Bermuda law. The restrictions may result in lower
investment yields on these assets, which may adversely affect our profitability.
We participate in a securities lending program whereby the securities we own that are included
in fixed maturity investments available for sale are loaned to third parties, primarily brokerage
firms, for a short period of time through a lending agent. We maintain control over the securities
we lend and can recall them at any time for any reason. We receive amounts equal to all interest
and dividends associated with the loaned securities and receive a fee from the borrower for the
temporary use of the securities. Collateral in the form of cash is required initially at a minimum
rate of 102% of the market value of the loaned securities and may not
-51-
decrease below 100% of the market value of the loaned securities before additional collateral
is required. We had $189.2 million and $144.6 million in securities on loan as of June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively, with collateral held against such loaned securities amounting
to $191.0 million and $147.2 million, respectively.
We do not anticipate that the restrictions on liquidity resulting from restrictions on the
payments of dividends by our subsidiary companies or from assets committed in trust accounts or to
collateralize the letter of credit facilities or by our securities lending program will have a
material impact on our ability to carry out our normal business activities, including interest and
dividend payments, respectively, on our senior notes and common shares.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Our sources of funds primarily consist of premium receipts net of commissions, investment
income, net proceeds from capital raising activities that may include the issuance of common
shares, senior notes and other debt or equity issuances, and proceeds from sales and redemption of
investments. Cash is used primarily to pay losses and loss expenses, purchase reinsurance, pay
general and administrative expenses and taxes, and pay dividends and interest, with the remainder
made available to our investment managers for investment in accordance with our investment policy.
On December 31, 2007, we filed a shelf-registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-148409)
with the SEC in which we may offer from time to time common shares, preference shares, depository
shares representing common shares or preference shares, senior or subordinated debt securities,
warrants to purchase common shares, preference shares and debt securities, share purchase
contracts, share purchase units and units which may consist of any combination of the securities
listed above. The proceeds from any issuance may be used for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions and other general corporate purposes.
Cash flows from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were $376.6 million compared
to $389.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in cash flows from
operations was primarily due to lower net premiums written.
Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of proceeds on the sale of investments
and payments for investments acquired. We had cash flows used in investing activities of $167.9
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $666.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007. The decrease in investing cash flows was due to higher proceeds on the sale of
fixed maturity securities caused by selling securities to capitalize the initial operations of our
U.S. reinsurance platform and to increase the capitalization of our U.S. and European operations,
some of which have not yet been reinvested. Also included in the cash flows used in investing
activities was the net cash paid for Finial Insurance Company of $44.1 million. Please refer to
Note 4 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements regarding our acquisition of
Finial Insurance Company.
Cash flows used in financing activities consist primarily of the payment of dividends and any
capital raising activities, which would include the issuance of common shares or debt. During the
six months ended June 30, 2008 we paid dividends of $17.6 million compared to $18.1 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2007.
-52-
On August 7, 2008, our board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share, or
approximately $8.8 million in aggregate, payable on September 11, 2008 to the shareholders of
record as of August 26, 2008. We expect our operating cash flows, together with our existing
capital base, to be sufficient to meet these requirements and to operate our business. Our funds
are primarily invested in liquid, high-grade fixed income securities. As of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, including a global high-yield bond fund, 99% of our fixed income portfolio consisted of
investment grade securities. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, net accumulated unrealized
gains, net of income taxes, were $39.0 million and $136.2 million, respectively. This change
reflected movements in interest rates partially offset by the recognition of approximately $37.3
million of realized losses on securities that were considered to be impaired on an
other-than-temporary-basis. The maturity distribution of our fixed income portfolio (on a market
value basis) as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
468.3 |
|
|
$ |
474.1 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
1,760.0 |
|
|
|
1,982.1 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
1,104.0 |
|
|
|
869.0 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
315.0 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
1,962.1 |
|
|
|
2,117.5 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
|
164.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,733.5 |
|
|
$ |
5,707.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have investments in various hedge funds, the market value of which was $192.7 million as of
June 30, 2008. Each of the hedge funds has redemption notice requirements. For those hedge funds
that are in the form of limited partnerships, liquidity is allowed after the term of the
partnership and could be extended at the option of the general partner. As of June 30, 2008, we
had two hedge funds that were in the form of limited partnerships, which allow for liquidity in
2010 unless extended by the general partners. Our other hedge funds typically allow liquidity an
average of three months after we give notice of redemption.
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations. The potential exists, after a catastrophe loss, for the development of inflationary
pressures in a local economy. The effects of inflation are considered implicitly in pricing. Loss
reserves are established to recognize likely loss settlements at the date payment is made. Those
reserves inherently recognize the effects of inflation. The actual effects of inflation on our
results cannot be accurately known, however, until claims are ultimately resolved.
Financial Strength Ratings
Financial strength ratings and senior unsecured debt ratings represent the opinions of rating
agencies on our capacity to meet our obligations. Some of our reinsurance treaties contain special
funding and termination clauses that are triggered in the event that we or one of our subsidiaries
is downgraded by one of the major rating agencies to levels specified in the treaties, or our
capital is significantly reduced. If such an event were to happen, we would be required, in
certain instances, to post collateral in the form of letters of credit and/or trust accounts
against existing outstanding losses, if any, related to the treaty. In a limited number of
instances, the subject treaties could be cancelled retroactively or commuted by the cedent and
might affect our ability to write business.
The following were our financial strength ratings as of August 4, 2008:
|
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
A/stable |
Moodys*
|
|
A2/negative |
Standard & Poors
|
|
A-/ under review with negative
implications |
|
|
|
* |
|
Moodys financial strength ratings are for the companys Bermuda and U.S. insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries. |
The following were our senior unsecured debt ratings as of August 4, 2008:
|
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
bbb/stable |
Moodys
|
|
Baa1/negative |
Standard & Poors
|
|
BBB/under review with negative
implications |
-53-
Long-Term Debt
On July 21, 2006, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.50% senior notes
due August 1, 2016, with interest payable August 1 and February 1 each year, commencing February 1,
2007. We can redeem the senior notes prior to maturity, subject to payment of a make-whole
premium, however, we currently have no intention of redeeming the notes. The senior notes include
certain covenants that include:
|
|
|
Limitation on liens on stock of designated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
Limitation as to the disposition of stock of designated subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on mergers, amalgamations, consolidations or sale of assets. |
We were in compliance with all covenants related to our senior notes as of June 30, 2008.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2008, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk: interest rate risk,
credit risk and currency risk.
The fixed income securities in our investment portfolio are subject to interest rate risk.
Any change in interest rates has a direct effect on the market values of fixed income securities.
As interest rates rise, the market values fall, and vice versa. We estimate that an immediate
adverse parallel shift in the U.S. Treasury yield curve of 200 basis points would cause an
aggregate decrease in the market value of our fixed maturity investments and cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $394.7 million, or 6.5%, as set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points |
|
|
-200 |
|
-100 |
|
-50 |
|
0 |
|
+50 |
|
+100 |
|
+200 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Total market value |
|
$ |
6,681.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,466.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,361.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,258.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,156.6 |
|
|
$ |
6,057.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,863.3 |
|
Market value change from base |
|
|
423.8 |
|
|
|
208.2 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(101.4 |
) |
|
|
(201.0 |
) |
|
|
(394.7 |
) |
Change in unrealized appreciation/
(depreciation) |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
(6.5 |
)% |
As a holder of fixed income securities, we also have exposure to credit risk. In an effort to
minimize this risk, our investment guidelines have been defined to ensure that the assets held are
well diversified and are primarily high-quality securities. As of June 30, 2008, approximately 99%
of our fixed income investments (which includes individually held securities and securities held in
a global high-yield bond fund) consisted of investment grade securities. We were not exposed to any
significant concentrations of credit risk.
As of June 30, 2008, we held $1,962.1 million, or 30.1%, of our aggregate invested assets in
mortgage-backed securities. These assets are exposed to prepayment risk, which occurs when holders
of individual mortgages increase the frequency with which they prepay the outstanding principal
before the maturity date to refinance at a lower interest rate cost. Given the proportion that
these securities comprise of the overall portfolio, and the current interest rate environment,
prepayment risk is not considered significant at this time. In addition, nearly all of our
investments in mortgage-backed securities were rated Aaa by Moodys and AAA by Standard &
Poors as of June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, our mortgage-backed securities that have exposure
to subprime mortgages was limited to $2.5 million, or 0.04%, of our fixed maturity investments.
As of June 30, 2008, we invested in various hedge funds with a market value of $192.7 million.
Investments in hedge funds involve certain risks related to, among other things, the illiquid
nature of the fund shares, the limited operating history of the fund, as well as risks associated
with the strategies employed by the managers of the funds. The funds objectives are generally to
seek attractive long-term returns with lower volatility by investing in a range of diversified
investment strategies. As our reserves and capital continue to build, we may consider additional
investments in these or other alternative investments.
-54-
The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the functional currency of all of our operating
subsidiaries. We enter into insurance and reinsurance contracts where the premiums receivable and
losses payable are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In addition, we maintain
a portion of our investments and liabilities in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily
Euro, British Sterling and the Canadian dollar. Assets in non-U.S. currencies are generally
converted into U.S. dollars at the time of receipt. When we incur a liability in a
non-U.S. currency, we carry such liability on our books in the original currency. These
liabilities are converted from the non-U.S. currency to U.S. dollars at the time of payment. As a
result, we have an exposure to foreign currency risk resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates.
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, 2.2% and 2.3%, respectively, of our aggregate
invested assets were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Of our business written
in the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, approximately 18% and 15% was written in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar, respectively. Of our business written in the year ended December 31,
2007, approximately 14% was written in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We utilize a hedging
strategy whose objective is to minimize the potential loss of value caused by currency fluctuations
by using foreign currency forward contract derivatives that expire in 90 days.
Our foreign exchange (loss) gain for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the year
ended December 31, 2007 are set forth in the chart below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Realized exchange (loss) gain |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Unrealized exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange (loss) gain |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, our management has performed an
evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2008. Disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified by SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow for
timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2008, our companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified by SEC rules and forms and accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for
timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated,
can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are
met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide an absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been
detected.
No changes were made in our internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
-55-
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are and in the future may become involved in various claims and legal proceedings that
arise in the normal course of our business. While any claim or legal proceeding contains an
element of uncertainty, we do not currently believe that any claim or legal proceeding to which we
are presently a party to is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business is subject to a number of risks, including those identified in Item 1A. of Part I
of our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, that could have a material effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity and that could cause our
operating results to vary significantly from period to period. The risks described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also could have a material effect
on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.
On June 27, 2008, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement)
with Allied World Merger Company, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, and Darwin. The
Merger Agreement provides for the merger of Allied World Merger Company with and into Darwin, with
Darwin continuing as the surviving corporation and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ours.
The following are a number of risks we face in connection with this proposed acquisition.
The occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination
of the Merger Agreement could adversely affect our future business.
There are significant risks and uncertainties associated with our proposed acquisition of
Darwin. The occurrence of certain events, changes or any other circumstances could give rise to
the termination of the Merger Agreement and cause the acquisition not to be completed. For
instance, there is no assurance that we will receive the necessary state insurance regulatory
approvals or Darwin will receive the approval of its stockholders. If either party fails to obtain
such approvals or meet other conditions necessary to complete the acquisition set forth in the Merger
Agreement, we would not be able to close this transaction. Failure to complete the acquisition
would prevent us from realizing its anticipated benefits to our business.
Our business could be adversely impacted by uncertainty related to the proposed acquisition,
whether or not the acquisition is completed.
Whether or not the acquisition is completed, the announcement and pendency of the acquisition
could impact our business, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations and the success of the acquisition, including:
|
|
|
that the proposed acquisition disrupts our current business plans and operations; |
|
|
|
|
our managements attention being directed toward the completion of the acquisition and
transaction-related considerations and being diverted away from our day-to-day business
operations and the execution of our current business plans; |
|
|
|
|
current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles
with the company, which might adversely affect our ability to attract and retain employees
who generate and service our business; and |
|
|
|
|
incurring transaction costs, such as legal, financing and accounting fees, and other
costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the acquisition, whether or not the
acquisition is completed. |
-56-
We must obtain several state regulatory approvals to complete the acquisition, which, if delayed,
not granted or granted with unacceptable conditions may jeopardize or delay the acquisition, result
in additional expense or reduce the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.
We must obtain certain approvals from state regulatory authorities prior to the completion of
the acquisition of Darwin and its insurance subsidiaries. State insurance laws generally require
that, prior to the acquisition of an insurance company, the acquiring party must obtain approval
from the insurance commissioner of the insurance companys state of domicile or, in certain
jurisdictions, where such insurance company is commercially domiciled. The regulatory authorities
from which we seek approvals have broad discretion in administering relevant laws and regulations.
As a condition to the approval of the acquisition, regulatory authorities may impose requirements
or limitations that could negatively affect the way Darwin conducts its business post-acquisition.
If we agree to any material conditions or restrictions in order to obtain any approvals required to
complete the acquisition, these conditions or restrictions could adversely affect our ability to
integrate each companys businesses or reduce the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.
The anticipated benefits of the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer
to realize than expected.
The acquisition involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated
independently. The two companies will devote significant management attention and resources to
integrating the two companies. Delays in this process could adversely affect our business, results
of operations, financial condition and share price after the completion of the acquisition.
Achieving the anticipated benefits of the acquisition is subject to a number of uncertainties,
including whether Darwins and our businesses are integrated in an efficient and effective manner,
and general competitive factors in the marketplace. We may experience unanticipated difficulties
or expenses in connection with integrating these businesses, including:
|
|
|
retaining existing employees, clients, brokers, agents and program administrators of
Darwin; |
|
|
|
|
retaining and integrating management and other key employees of Darwin; and |
|
|
|
|
potential charges to earnings resulting from the application of purchase accounting to
the transaction. |
Even if the business operations are integrated successfully, there can be no assurance that we
will realize the full benefits of synergies, cost savings and operating efficiencies that we
currently expect from this integration or that these benefits will be achieved within the
anticipated time frame. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in increased
costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of managements time and energy
and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
(a) On May 8, 2008, we held our 2008 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual
General Meeting).
(b) Proxies were solicited by our management in connection with the Annual General Meeting at
which the following matters were acted upon with the voting results indicated below. There was no
solicitation of opposition to our nominees listed in the proxy statement. Our Class I directors
were re-elected for a three-year term as described in (c) (1) below.
The other directors, whose term of office continued after the Annual General Meeting are:
Scott A. Carmilani
James F. Duffy
Bart Friedman
-57-
Scott Hunter
Michael I.D. Morrison
(c) 1. Election of Directors
Our board of directors is divided into three classes: Class I, Class II and Class III, each of
approximately equal size. In accordance with our Bye-laws, directors are elected by shareholders
holding a plurality of the votes cast. At the Annual General Meeting, our shareholders elected our
Class I directors to hold office until our companys Annual General Meeting of Shareholders in
2011, or until their successors are duly elected and qualified or their office is otherwise
vacated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Votes For |
|
Withheld Authority |
Mark R. Patterson |
|
|
14,219,537 |
|
|
|
14,584,555 |
|
Samuel J. Weinhoff |
|
|
14,399,854 |
|
|
|
14,404,238 |
|
2. Approval of Eligible Subsidiary Directors
In accordance with our Bye-laws, no person may be elected as a director of our companys
non-U.S. subsidiaries (excluding Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd) unless such person has been
approved by our companys shareholders. At our Annual General Meeting, the following slates of
nominees were approved as eligible subsidiary directors of our non-U.S. subsidiaries:
Allied World Assurance Holdings (Ireland) Ltd - the slate of Scott A. Carmilani, John
Clifford, Wesley D. Dupont, Hugh Governey, Michael I.D. Morrison and John T. Redmond.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
28,476,139
|
|
321,279
|
|
6,416 |
Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited - the slate of J. Michael Baldwin, Scott A.
Carmilani, John Clifford, Hugh Governey, Michael I.D. Morrison and John T. Redmond.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
28,476,462
|
|
321,274
|
|
6,356 |
Allied World Assurance Company (Reinsurance) Limited - the slate of J. Michael Baldwin, Scott
A. Carmilani, John Clifford, Hugh Governey, Michael I.D. Morrison and John T. Redmond.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
28,476,447
|
|
321,289
|
|
6,356 |
Newmarket Administrative Services (Bermuda), Ltd- the slate of Scott A. Carmilani, Joan H.
Dillard, Wesley D. Dupont and Richard E. Jodoin.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
28,564,590
|
|
232,888
|
|
6,356 |
Newmarket Administrative Services (Ireland) Limited- the slate of Scott A. Carmilani, John
Clifford, Hugh Governey and John T. Redmond.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
28,565,939
|
|
232,782
|
|
5,371 |
-58-
3. Approval of Second Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan
Our shareholders approved the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second Amended and
Restated 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Non-Votes |
24,845,661
|
|
1,711,173
|
|
4,075
|
|
2,243,183 |
4. Approval of Second Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan
Our shareholders approved the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second Amended and
Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Non-Votes |
23,685,961
|
|
2,871,048
|
|
3,900
|
|
2,243,183 |
5. Approval of Employee Share Purchase Plan
Our shareholders approved the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd 2008 Employee Share
Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Non-Votes |
26,413,930
|
|
152,440
|
|
3,539
|
|
2,243,183 |
6. Approval and Adoption of Second Amended and Restated Bye-Laws
Our shareholders approved and adopted the Second Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Allied World
Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
28,573,125
|
|
217,945
|
|
13,022 |
7. Appointment of Independent Auditors
Our shareholders approved the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as our independent auditors to
serve until our 2009 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstain |
28,785,575
|
|
18,377
|
|
140 |
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1(1)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 27, 2008, by and among Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, Allied World Merger Company and Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc. |
|
|
|
2.2(1)
|
|
Voting Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2008, by and among Allied World Assurance Company Holdings,
Ltd, Allied World Merger Company, and Alleghany Insurance Holdings, LLC. |
-59-
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.1(2)
|
|
Discretionary Investment Management Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2008, by and between Allied World
Reinsurance Company and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, filed with the SEC on June 30, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, filed with the SEC on May 16, 2008. |
|
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
|
* |
|
These certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States
Code) and are not being filed as part of this report. |
-60-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2008
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Scott A. Carmilani
Scott A. Carmilani
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2008
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Joan H. Dillard
Joan H. Dillard
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
-61-
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1(1)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 27, 2008, by and among Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, Allied World Merger Company and Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc. |
|
|
|
2.2(1)
|
|
Voting Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2008, by and among Allied World Assurance Company Holdings,
Ltd, Allied World Merger Company, and Alleghany Insurance Holdings, LLC. |
|
|
|
10.1(2)
|
|
Discretionary Investment Management Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2008, by and between Allied World
Reinsurance Company and Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc. Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, filed with the SEC on June 30, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, filed with the SEC on May 16, 2008. |
|
|
|
Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. |
|
* |
|
These certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States
Code) and are not being filed as part of this report. |
-62-