e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32868
DELEK US HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
52-2319066 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
7102 Commerce Way
|
|
37027 |
Brentwood, Tennessee
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
(615) 771-6701
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
At November 2, 2009, there were 53,700,570 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value,
outstanding.
Part I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except share and per share data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
120.1 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
351.2 |
|
|
|
200.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
848.2 |
|
|
|
708.9 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(158.0 |
) |
|
|
(127.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
690.2 |
|
|
|
581.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Minority investment |
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
|
131.6 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,266.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,017.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
201.9 |
|
|
$ |
68.0 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
68.9 |
|
Note payable |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
302.8 |
|
|
|
186.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
287.1 |
|
|
|
202.1 |
|
Environmental liabilities, net of current portion |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
71.1 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
411.6 |
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 110,000,000 shares authorized, 53,700,570 and 53,682,070 shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
280.1 |
|
|
|
277.8 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
271.8 |
|
|
|
256.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
552.2 |
|
|
|
533.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,266.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,017.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except share and per share data) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
817.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,402.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,766.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,957.1 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
745.1 |
|
|
|
1,271.2 |
|
|
|
1,562.9 |
|
|
|
3,654.7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
154.8 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
Insurance proceeds business interruption |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property damage proceeds, net |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
820.1 |
|
|
|
1,357.8 |
|
|
|
1,713.0 |
|
|
|
3,897.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Loss from equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Other expenses (income), net |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expenses |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
53,700,497 |
|
|
|
53,680,570 |
|
|
|
53,690,793 |
|
|
|
53,673,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
53,700,497 |
|
|
|
54,380,835 |
|
|
|
54,449,404 |
|
|
|
54,414,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share outstanding |
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
$ |
0.1125 |
|
|
$ |
0.1125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
4
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Accretion of asset retirement obligations |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss from equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Loss on interest rate derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Loss on sale of investments |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
Loss on sale of assets held for sale |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
Inventories and other current assets |
|
|
(42.1 |
) |
|
|
23.4 |
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities |
|
|
146.1 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
Non-current assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
151.3 |
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(472.8 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
517.2 |
|
Expenditures to rebuild refinery |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property damage insurance proceeds |
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(153.6 |
) |
|
|
(90.9 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(105.1 |
) |
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolvers |
|
|
377.6 |
|
|
|
730.0 |
|
Payments on revolvers |
|
|
(323.3 |
) |
|
|
(794.3 |
) |
Proceeds from other debt instruments |
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
Payments on debt and capital lease obligations |
|
|
(63.8 |
) |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Deferred financing costs paid |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
(85.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
(25.6 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
|
$ |
79.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized interest of $1.3 and $2.9 in the 2009 and 2008 periods, respectively |
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements
5
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. General
Delek US Holdings, Inc. (Delek, we, our or us) is the sole shareholder of MAPCO Express, Inc.
(Express), MAPCO Fleet, Inc. (Fleet), Delek Refining, Inc. (Refining), Delek Finance, Inc.
(Finance) and Delek Marketing & Supply, Inc. (Marketing) (collectively, the Subsidiaries).
We are a Delaware corporation formed in connection with our acquisition in May 2001 of 198
retail fuel and convenience stores from a subsidiary of the Williams Companies. Since then, we have
completed several other acquisitions of retail fuel and convenience stores. In April 2005, we
expanded our scope of operations to include complementary petroleum refining and wholesale and
distribution businesses by acquiring a refinery in Tyler, Texas. We initiated operations of our
marketing segment in August 2006 with the purchase of assets from Pride Companies LP and affiliates
(Pride Acquisition). Delek and Express were incorporated during April 2001 in the State of
Delaware. Fleet, Refining, Finance, and Marketing were incorporated in the State of Delaware during
January 2004, February 2005, April 2005 and June 2006, respectively.
Delek is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol DK. As of September
30, 2009, 73.8% of our outstanding shares are beneficially owned by Delek Group Ltd. (Delek Group)
located in Natanya, Israel.
2. Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Delek and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) have been condensed or omitted, although management believes that the disclosures herein are
adequate to make the financial information presented not misleading. Our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP applied on a
consistent basis with those of the annual audited financial statements included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). These unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year
ended December 31, 2008 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9,
2009.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods have been included. All
significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
All adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Operating results for the interim period should
not be viewed as representative of results that may be expected for any future interim period or
for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Segment Reporting
Delek is a diversified energy business focused on petroleum refining, wholesale sales of
refined products and retail marketing. Management views operating results in three segments:
refining, marketing and retail. The refining segment owns a high conversion, independent refinery
in Tyler, Texas. The marketing segment sells refined products on a wholesale basis in west Texas
through company-owned and third-party operated terminals and crude oil pipelines and owns certain
refined product and crude oil storage facilities. The retail segment markets gasoline, diesel and
other refined petroleum products, and convenience merchandise through a network of 443
company-operated retail fuel and convenience stores. Additionally, we operate 9 retail fuel and
convenience stores that are classified as held for sale and included as discontinued operations as
of September 30, 2009. Segment reporting is more fully discussed in Note 9.
6
Discontinued Operations
In December 2008, we met the requirements under the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360, Property, Plant and Equipment
(ASC 360), to classify our retail segments Virginia division (Virginia stores) as a group of
assets held for sale. The fair value assessment of these assets, performed in the fourth quarter of
2008, did not result in an impairment. We have ceased depreciation of these assets. We sold 12 of
the 36 Virginia stores during December 2008 and an additional 15 of the Virginia stores during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. We expect that we will dispose of the remaining stores in
2009.
Reclassifications
Having classified the Virginia stores as assets held for sale, the condensed consolidated
balance sheets for all periods presented have been reclassified to reflect net assets held for sale
and net liabilities associated with assets held for sale. The statements of operations for all
periods presented have been reclassified to reflect the results of the Virginia stores as income
from discontinued operations, net of taxes.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Delek maintains cash and cash equivalents in accounts with large, national financial
institutions and retains nominal amounts of cash at the convenience store locations as petty cash.
All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are
considered to be cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2009, these cash equivalents consisted
primarily of overnight investments in U.S. Government obligations and bank repurchase obligations
collateralized by U.S. Government obligations.
Investments
We have owned an investment in auction rate securities, valued at $5.6 million, since the
auction rate market began to fail in 2008. During 2008, because of these failed auctions, we
reclassified our auction rate investment from short-term investments to other non-current assets.
The $5.6 million investment we held in auction rate securities had an underlying investment in a
single series of preferred stock of Bank of America.
In June 2009, Bank of America made an offer to exchange shares of common stock of Bank of
America for certain series of its preferred shares that were then outstanding. On June 22, 2009, we
redeemed our auction rate trust certificates for Bank of Americas Series 5, floating rate,
non-cumulative preferred stock, which we exchanged on June 23, 2009, for 286,496 shares of common
stock of Bank of America. Due to the consideration paid for the Bank
of America preferred shares under the terms of the exchange offer, we recognized a loss of approximately $2.0 million on this exchange, which is
included in other expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
However, in September 2009, we sold the 286,496 shares of Bank of America common stock
received in the exchange, and recognized a gain of $1.4 million relating to the sale. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized gains (losses) of $1.4 million and
($0.6) million, respectively, which are included in other expenses on the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of operations. Upon the sale of these 286,496
shares, we had no remaining
position in auction rate securities or in the capital stock of Bank of America.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable primarily represent receivables related to credit card sales, receivables
from vendor promotions and trade receivables generated in the ordinary course of business. All
accounts receivable amounts are considered to be fully collectible.
Inventory
Refinery inventory consists of crude oil, refined products and blendstocks which are stated at
the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) valuation
method. Cost of crude oil, refined product and blendstock inventories in excess of market value are
charged to cost of goods sold. Such changes are subject to reversal in subsequent periods, not to
exceed LIFO cost, if prices recover.
7
Marketing inventory consists of refined products which are stated at the lower of cost or
market on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis.
Retail merchandise inventory consists of gasoline, diesel fuel, other petroleum products,
cigarettes, beer, convenience merchandise and food service merchandise. Fuel inventories are stated
at the lower of cost or market on a FIFO basis. Non-fuel inventories are stated at estimated cost
as determined by the retail inventory method.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Assets acquired by Delek are recorded at estimated fair market value in accordance with the
purchase method of accounting as prescribed in ASC 805, Business Combinations. Other acquisitions
of property and equipment are carried at cost. Betterments, renewals and extraordinary repairs that
extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense
as incurred. Delek owns certain fixed assets on leased locations and depreciates these assets and
asset improvements over the lesser of managements estimated useful lives of the assets or the
remaining lease term.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over managements estimated useful
lives of the related assets, which are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Automobiles |
|
3-5 years |
Computer equipment and software |
|
3-10 years |
Refinery turnaround costs |
|
4 years |
Furniture and fixtures |
|
5-15 years |
Retail store equipment |
|
7-15 years |
Asset retirement obligation assets |
|
15-40 years |
Refinery machinery and equipment |
|
15-40 years |
Petroleum and other site (POS) improvements |
|
8-40 years |
Building and building improvements |
|
40 years |
Property, plant and equipment and accumulated depreciation by reporting segment as of and for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
and Other |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
421.0 |
|
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
|
$ |
390.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
848.2 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(47.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(105.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(158.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
373.6 |
|
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
285.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
690.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
accordance with ASC 360, Delek evaluates the realizability
of property, plant and equipment as events occur that might indicate potential impairment.
Capitalized Interest
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, Delek had several ongoing capital
construction projects in the refining segment and construction related to a new store being built
and several re-image projects in the retail segment. The refining segment capitalized interest of
$0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
and $0.5 million and $2.7 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008. The retail segment capitalized a nominal amount of interest for both the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and a nominal amount and $0.2 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively. There was no interest capitalized by the marketing segment
for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008.
Refinery Turnaround Costs
Refinery turnaround costs are incurred in connection with planned shutdowns and inspections of
the refinerys major units to perform necessary repairs and replacements. Refinery turnaround costs
are deferred when incurred, classified as property, plant and
8
equipment and amortized on a straight-line basis over that period of time estimated to lapse
until the next planned turnaround occurs. Refinery turnaround costs include, among other things,
the cost to repair, restore, refurbish or replace refinery equipment such as vessels, tanks,
reactors, piping, rotating equipment, instrumentation, electrical equipment, heat exchangers and
fired heaters. During the second quarter of 2009, we successfully completed a major turnaround on
all of the units at the refinery.
Goodwill and Potential Impairment
Goodwill in an acquisition represents the excess of the aggregate purchase price over the fair
value of the identifiable net assets. Deleks goodwill, all of which was acquired in various
purchase business combinations, is recorded at original fair value and is not amortized. Goodwill
is subject to annual assessment to determine if an impairment of value has occurred and Delek
performs this review annually in the fourth quarter. We could also be required to evaluate our
goodwill if, prior to our annual assessment, we experience disruptions in our business, have
unexpected significant declines in operating results, or sustain a permanent market capitalization
decline. No events occurred during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2009 that would
require an evaluation of our goodwill. If a reporting units carrying amount exceeds its fair
value, the impairment assessment leads to the testing of the implied fair value of the reporting
units goodwill to its carrying amount. If the implied fair value is less than the carrying amount,
a goodwill impairment charge is recorded. We do not believe any goodwill impairment existed as of
September 30, 2009.
Derivatives
Delek records all derivative financial instruments, including interest rate swap and cap
agreements, fuel-related derivatives, over the counter (OTC) future swaps and forward contracts at
estimated fair value regardless of their intended use in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). Changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are
recognized in operations, unless we elect to apply the hedging treatment permitted under the
provisions of ASC 815 allowing such changes to be classified as other comprehensive income. We
validate the fair value of all derivative financial instruments on a monthly basis, utilizing
valuations from third party financial and brokerage institutions. On a regular basis, Delek enters
into commodity contracts with counterparties for crude oil and various finished products. These
contracts usually qualify for the normal purchase / normal sale exemption under the standard and,
as such, are not measured at fair value.
Deleks policy under the guidance of ASC 815-10-45, Derivatives and Hedging Other
Presentation Matters (ASC 815-10-45), is to net the fair value amounts recognized for multiple
derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty and offset these values against the cash
collateral arising from these derivative positions.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair values of financial instruments are estimated based upon current market conditions
and quoted market prices for the same or similar instruments. Management estimates that the
carrying value approximates fair value for all of Deleks assets and liabilities that fall under
the scope of ASC 825, Financial Instruments (ASC 825).
Delek applies the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (ASC 820) in
its presentation and disclosures regarding fair value, which pertain to certain financial assets
and liabilities measured at fair value in the statement of position on a recurring basis. ASC 820
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about
such measurements that are permitted or required under other accounting pronouncements. See Note 10
for further discussion.
Delek also applies the provisions of ASC 825 as it pertains to the fair value option. This
standard permits the election to carry financial instruments and certain other items similar to
financial instruments at fair value on the balance sheet, with all changes in fair value reported
in earnings. By electing the fair value option in conjunction with a derivative, an entity can
achieve an accounting result similar to a fair value hedge without having to comply with complex
hedge accounting rules. As of September 30, 2009, we did not make the fair value election for any
financial instruments not already carried at fair value in accordance with other standards.
Self-Insurance Reserves
Delek is primarily self-insured for employee medical, workers compensation and general
liability costs, with varying limits of per claim and aggregate stop loss insurance coverage in
amounts determined reasonable by management. We maintain an accrual for these costs based on claims
filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported. Differences between actual settlements
and recorded accruals are recorded in the period identified.
9
Vendor Discounts and Deferred Revenue
Delek receives cash discounts or cash payments from certain vendors related to product
promotions based upon factors such as quantities purchased, quantities sold, merchandise
exclusivity, store space and various other factors. In accordance with ASC 605-50, Revenue
Recognition Customer Payments and Incentives, we recognize these amounts as a reduction of
inventory until the products are sold, at which time the amounts are reflected as a reduction in
cost of goods sold. Certain of these amounts are received from vendors related to agreements
covering several periods. These amounts are initially recorded as deferred revenue, are
reclassified as a reduction in inventory upon receipt of the products, and are subsequently
recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold as the products are sold.
Delek also receives advance payments from certain vendors relating to non-inventory
agreements. These amounts are recorded as deferred revenue and are subsequently recognized as a
reduction of cost of goods sold as earned.
Environmental Expenditures
It is Deleks policy to accrue environmental and clean-up related costs of a non-capital
nature when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably
estimated. Environmental liabilities represent the current estimated costs to investigate and
remediate contamination at our properties. This estimate is based on internal and third-party
assessments of the extent of the contamination, the selected remediation technology and review of
applicable environmental regulations, typically considering estimated activities and costs for the
next 15 years, unless a specific longer range estimate is practicable. Accruals for estimated costs
from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the
remedial feasibility study and include, but are not limited to, costs to perform remedial actions
and costs of machinery and equipment that are dedicated to the remedial actions and that do not
have an alternative use. Such accruals are adjusted as further information develops or
circumstances change. We discount environmental liabilities to their present value if the payments
are fixed and determinable. Expenditures for equipment necessary for environmental issues relating
to ongoing operations are capitalized.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Delek recognizes liabilities which represent the fair value of a legal obligation to perform
asset retirement activities, including those that are conditioned on a future event when the amount
can be reasonably estimated. In the retail segment, these obligations relate to the net present
value of estimated costs to remove underground storage tanks at owned and leased retail sites which
are legally required under the applicable leases. The asset retirement obligation for storage tank
removal on retail sites is being accreted over the expected life of the owned retail site or the
average retail site lease term. In the refining segment, these obligations relate to the required
disposal of waste in certain storage tanks, asbestos abatement at an identified location and other
estimated costs that would be legally required upon final closure of the refinery. In the marketing
segment, these obligations relate to the required cleanout of the pipeline and terminal tanks, and
removal of certain above-grade portions of the pipeline situated on right-of-way property.
The reconciliation of the beginning and ending carrying amounts of asset retirement
obligations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008
is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
Additional liabilities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount represents managements recognition of an asset retirement obligation
associated with additional underground storage tanks at various retail stores which previously
was not assessed as required. |
In order to determine fair value, management must make certain estimates and assumptions
including, among other things, projected cash flows, a credit-adjusted risk-free rate and an
assessment of market conditions that could significantly impact the estimated fair value of the
asset retirement obligation.
10
Revenue Recognition
Revenues for products sold are recorded at the point of sale upon delivery of product, which
is the point at which title to the product is transferred, and when payment has either been
received or collection is reasonably assured.
Delek derives service revenue from the sale of lottery tickets, money orders, car washes and
other ancillary product and service offerings. Service revenue and related costs are recorded at
gross amounts and net amounts, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 605-45,
Revenue Recognition Principal Agent Considerations (ASC 605-45). We record service revenue and
related costs at gross amounts when Delek is the primary obligor, is subject to inventory risk, has
latitude in establishing prices and selecting suppliers, influences product or service
specifications, or has several but not all of these indicators. When Delek is not the primary
obligor and does not possess other indicators of gross reporting as discussed previously, we record
net service revenue.
Cost of Goods Sold and Operating Expenses
For the retail segment, cost of goods sold comprises the costs of specific products sold.
Operating expenses include costs such as wages of employees at the stores, lease and utilities
expense for the stores, credit card interchange transaction charges and other costs of operating
the stores. For the refining segment, cost of goods sold includes all the costs of crude oil,
feedstocks and external costs. Operating expenses include the costs associated with the actual
operations of the refinery. For the marketing segment, cost of goods sold includes all costs of
refined products, additives and related transportation. Operating expenses include the costs
associated with the actual operation of owned terminals, terminaling expense at third-party
locations and pipeline maintenance costs.
Sales, Use and Excise Taxes
Deleks policy is to exclude sales, use and excise taxes from revenue when we are an agent of
the taxing authority, in accordance with ASC 605-45.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs represent expenses related to issuing our long-term debt and
obtaining our lines of credit. These amounts are amortized over the remaining term of the
respective financing and are included in interest expense. See Note 7 for further information.
Advertising Costs
Delek expenses advertising costs as the advertising space is utilized. Advertising expense for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $0.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively,
and was $0.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2008.
Operating Leases
Delek leases land and buildings under various operating lease arrangements, most of which
provide the option, after the initial lease term, to renew the leases. Some of these lease
arrangements include fixed rental rate increases, while others include rental rate increases based
upon such factors as changes, if any, in defined inflationary indices.
In accordance with ASC 840-20, Leases Operating Leases, for all leases that include fixed
rental rate increases, Delek calculates the total rent expense for the entire lease period,
considering renewals for all periods for which failure to renew the lease imposes economic penalty,
and records rental expense on a straight-line basis in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of operations.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740). This
statement generally requires Delek to record deferred income taxes for the differences between the
book and tax bases of its assets and liabilities, which are measured using enacted tax rates and
laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax
expense or benefit represents the net change during the year in our deferred income tax assets and
liabilities.
11
ASC 740 also prescribes a comprehensive model for how companies should recognize, measure,
present and disclose in their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be
taken on a tax return and prescribes the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required
to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Finally, ASC 740 requires an annual
tabular rollforward of unrecognized tax benefits.
Delek files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, as well as income tax returns in
various state jurisdictions. Delek is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by
tax authorities for years before 2006 or state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities
for the years before 2004. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has examined Deleks income tax
returns through 2006.
Delek recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as an
adjustment to the current provision for income taxes. Interest of $0.2 and $0.3 million was
recognized related to unrecognized tax benefits during the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009, respectively. Interest of $0.2 million was recognized related to unrecognized tax
benefits during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) are computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average common shares outstanding. The common shares used to compute Deleks basic and diluted
earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the |
|
|
For the |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
53,700,497 |
|
|
|
53,680,570 |
|
|
|
53,690,793 |
|
|
|
53,673,290 |
|
Dilutive effect of equity instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,265 |
|
|
|
758,611 |
|
|
|
740,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding,
assuming dilution |
|
|
53,700,497 |
|
|
|
54,380,835 |
|
|
|
54,449,404 |
|
|
|
54,414,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding stock options totaling 3,508,137 and 3,434,262 common shares were excluded from
the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
respectively. Outstanding stock options totaling 1,807,859 and 1,866,059 common shares were
excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. These share equivalents did not have a dilutive effect under the
treasury stock method. Outstanding stock options totaling 723,006 were also excluded from the
diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended September 30, 2009 because of
their anti-dilutive effect due to the net loss for the period.
Shareholders Equity
On August 5, 2009, our Board of Directors voted to declare a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.0375 per share, payable on September 16, 2009 to shareholders of record on August 26, 2009.
Stock-Based Compensation
ASC 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC 718), requires the use of a valuation model
to calculate the fair value of stock-based awards. Delek uses the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock-based awards as of the date of grant.
Restricted stock units (RSUs) are measured based on the fair market value of the underlying
stock on the date of grant. Vested RSUs are not issued until the minimum statutory withholding
requirements have been remitted to us for payment to the taxing authority. As a result, the actual
number of shares accounted for as issued may be less than the number of RSUs vested, due to any
withholding amounts which have not been remitted.
We generally recognize compensation expense related to stock-based awards with graded or cliff
vesting on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Comprehensive Income
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, comprehensive income includes net
income, recognition of unrealized gains on derivative instruments previously designated as cash
flow hedges and changes in the fair value of available for sale investments. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, comprehensive income includes net income and changes in the
12
fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in millions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the |
|
|
For the |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on
derivative instruments, net of
tax expense (benefit) of $0.1 and
$5.3 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively and $0.3 and $(2.8)
for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4.4 |
) |
|
$ |
34.2 |
|
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance regarding subsequent events, which is effective for
interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and should be applied prospectively. This
guidance is largely similar to the current guidance in the auditing literature with some exceptions
which are not intended to result in significant changes in practice. Delek adopted this guidance in
May 2009. The adoption did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on the recognition and presentation of
other-than-temporary-impairments and provide some new disclosure requirements for debt securities.
This pronouncement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, and is
applied to existing and new investments held by an entity as of the beginning of the period in
which it was adopted. Delek adopted this guidance in April 2009. The adoption did not have an
impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and activity
for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for
the asset or liability. This pronouncement also provides additional guidance on circumstances that
may indicate a transaction is not orderly. Delek adopted this guidance in April 2009. The adoption
did not have an impact on our financial positions or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance that extends the disclosure requirements regarding the
fair value of financial instruments to interim financial statements of publicly traded companies.
This pronouncement is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Delek
adopted this pronouncement in April 2009. The additional disclosures required did not have an
impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance requiring the acquiring entity in a business
combination to recognize the fair value of all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the
transaction, establishes the acquisition-date as the fair value measurement point, and modifies the
disclosure requirements. This guidance applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. However, accounting for changes in valuation
allowances for acquired deferred tax assets and the resolution of uncertain tax positions for prior
business combinations will impact tax expense instead of impacting the prior business combination
accounting starting January 1, 2009. Delek adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009 and
wrote-off $0.7 million in previously capitalized transaction costs as a result of the adoption. We
will also assess the impact of this guidance in the event we enter into a business combination in
the future.
Also
in December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that changes the classification of non-controlling
interests, sometimes called minority interest, in the consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, this guidance establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a parent
companys ownership interest that do not result in deconsolidation and requires a parent company to
recognize a gain or loss when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This guidance is effective January 1,
2009, and will be applied prospectively with the exception of the presentation and disclosure
requirements which must be applied retrospectively. Delek has no minority interest reporting in its
consolidated reporting, therefore adoption of this guidance does not have an impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued guidance regarding the disclosure about derivative instruments
and hedging activities, which applies to all derivative instruments and non-derivative instruments
that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments and related hedged items. The standard
requires entities to provide greater transparency through additional disclosures about how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged
items affect an entitys financial position, results of operations, and
13
cash flows. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. Delek has adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009. See
Note 11 for discussion of our derivative activities.
3. Explosion and Fire at the Tyler, Texas Refinery
On November 20, 2008, an explosion and fire occurred at our 60,000 barrels per day (bpd)
refinery in Tyler, Texas. Some individuals have claimed injury and two of our employees died as a
result of the event. The event caused damage to both our saturates gas plant and naphtha
hydrotreater and resulted in an immediate suspension of our refining operations. We resumed normal
operations in May 2009.
Several parallel investigations were commenced following the event, including our own
investigation and inspections by the U.S. Department of Labors Occupational Safety & Health
Administration (OSHA), U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). OSHA concluded its inspection in May 2009 and issued
citations assessing an aggregate penalty of approximately $0.2 million. We are contesting these
citations and do not believe that the outcome will have a material effect on our business. We
cannot assure you as to the outcome of the other investigations, including possible civil penalties
or other enforcement actions.
We carry insurance coverage of $1.0 billion in combined limits to insure against property
damage and business interruption. We are subject to a $5.0 million deductible for property damage
insurance and a 45 calendar day waiting period for business interruption insurance. During the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized income from insurance proceeds of
$12.0 million and $100.2 million, respectively, of which, $6.0 million and $64.1 million,
respectively, is included as business interruption proceeds and $6.0 million and $36.1 million,
respectively, is included as property damage proceeds. We also recorded expenses of $0.2 million
and $11.4 million, respectively, resulting in a net gain of $5.8 million and $24.7 million,
respectively, related to property damage proceeds on the accompanying condensed consolidated
statement of operations. At December 31, 2008, a receivable of $8.4 million was recorded relating
to expected insurance proceeds covering certain losses incurred to limit commodity inventory
exposure with the suspension of operations at the refinery. This receivable was reversed in January
2009 upon receipt of insurance monies.
4. Dispositions and Assets Held for Sale
Virginia Stores
As of December 31, 2008, the retail segments Virginia division met the requirements as
enumerated in ASC 360, requiring the separate reporting of assets held for sale. Management
committed to a plan to sell the retail segments Virginia stores and proceeded with efforts to
locate buyers. However, until we obtained the necessary amendments to our credit agreements, we
were encumbered from taking that action. At the time the credit agreement limitations were lifted
in December 2008, we had contracts to sell 28 of the 36 Virginia properties. As of September 30,
2009, we have completed the sale of 27 of those 28 properties, 15 of which were sold during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. We continue our efforts to sell the remaining properties. We
received proceeds from the sales of the Virginia stores completed during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, net of expenses, of $9.3 million, recognizing losses on those sales of $1.1
million. In addition to the property, plant and equipment sold, we sold $0.9 million in inventory,
at cost, to the buyers during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The carrying amounts of the Virginia store assets sold during the nine months ended September
30, 2009 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine |
|
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
Property, plant & equipment, net of accumulated
depreciation of $4.0 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
14
The carrying amounts of the major classes of assets and liabilities included in assets
held for sale and liabilities associated with assets held for sale as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
Property, plant & equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $2.8 million and
$6.8 million as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held for sale |
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the Virginia stores were identified as assets held for sale, the operations associated
with these properties qualified for reporting as discontinued operations under ASC 360.
Accordingly, the operating results, net of tax, from discontinued operations are presented
separately in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and the notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to exclude the discontinued operations. The
amounts eliminated from continuing operations did not include allocations of corporate expenses
included in the selling, general and administrative expenses caption in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations, nor the income tax benefits from such expenses. Components of amounts
reflected in income from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the |
|
|
For the |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
62.6 |
|
|
$ |
57.5 |
|
|
$ |
175.8 |
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
(60.9 |
) |
|
|
(56.5 |
) |
|
|
(172.6 |
) |
Gain (loss) on sale of assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Write-down of goodwill associated with the sale of assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Inventory
Carrying value of inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
20.8 |
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
Refinery work in process |
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Refinery finished goods |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Retail fuel |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
Retail merchandise |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
Marketing refined products |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
120.1 |
|
|
$ |
80.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, market values had fallen below most of our LIFO inventory layer values
and, as a result, we recognized a pre-tax loss of approximately $10.9 million relating to the
reflection of market value at a level below cost. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
we recognized gains of $9.0 million relating to the recovery of these losses, not to exceed LIFO
cost, due to the recovery of market values. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we
recognized a reversal of loss recovery of $1.0 million due to a reduction in market price increases
since June 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the excess of replacement cost (FIFO) over the
carrying value (LIFO) of refinery inventories was $10.7 million. The excess of replacement cost
(FIFO) over the carrying value (LIFO) of refinery inventories at December 31, 2008 was nominal.
15
Temporary Liquidations
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred a temporary LIFO liquidation
gain in our refinery inventory of $5.2 million, which we expect to be restored by the end of the
year. The temporary LIFO liquidation gain has been deferred as a component of accrued expenses and
other current liabilities in the accompanying September 30, 2009 condensed consolidated balance
sheet.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we incurred a temporary LIFO liquidation
gain in our refinery inventory of $8.1 million, which was restored by the end of the year. The
temporary LIFO liquidation gain was deferred as a component of accrued expenses and other current
liabilities.
Permanent Liquidations
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we incurred a permanent reduction
in the LIFO layer, resulting in a liquidation of our refinery inventory in the amount of $0.5
million and $1.2 million, respectively. This liquidation, which represents a reduction of
approximately 62,000 barrels, was recognized as a component of cost of goods sold in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we incurred a permanent reduction in the
LIFO layer resulting in a liquidation in our refinery work in process and finished goods
inventories in the amount of $14.9 million and during the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
incurred a change in the value of this reduction in the LIFO layer, resulting in a liquidation loss
of $7.9 million. The total liquidation gain incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
was $7.0 million. This liquidation, which represents a reduction of approximately 177,000 barrels,
was recognized as a reduction of cost of goods sold in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
6. Minority Investment
Investment in Lion Oil Company
On August 22, 2007, Delek completed the acquisition of approximately 28.4% of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of Lion Oil Company (Lion Oil). On September 25, 2007, Delek
completed the acquisition of an additional approximately 6.2% of the issued and outstanding shares
of Lion Oil, bringing its total ownership interest to approximately 34.6%. Total cash consideration
paid to the sellers by Delek in both transactions totaled approximately $88.2 million. Delek also
incurred and capitalized $0.9 million in acquisition transaction costs. In addition to cash
consideration, Delek issued to one of the sellers 1,916,667 shares of Delek common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, valued at $51.2 million using the closing price of our stock on the date of the
acquisition. As of December 31, 2007, our total investment in Lion Oil was $139.5 million.
Lion Oil, a privately held Arkansas corporation, owns and operates a 75,000 barrel per day,
crude oil refinery in El Dorado, Arkansas, three crude oil pipelines, a crude oil gathering system
and two refined petroleum product terminals in Memphis and Nashville, Tennessee. The two terminals
supply products to some of Deleks approximately 180 convenience stores in the Memphis and
Nashville markets. These product purchases are made at market value and totaled $1.6 million and
$7.2 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $2.0
million and $10.4 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The refining segment also had sales of $2.5 million of intermediate products to the Lion Oil
refinery during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. All
such sales were made on arms length terms and conditions. No sales of intermediate
products were made during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2008.
At the time of acquisition, we acknowledged that our ownership percentage set a presumption
for the use of the equity method of accounting as established in ASC 323, Investments Equity
Method and Joint Ventures (ASC 323). As a result, we reported our investment using the equity
method from acquisition through September 30, 2008. However, our interactions with Lion Oil since
acquisition led us to conclude that the initial presumption under ASC 323 had been rebutted.
Beginning October 1, 2008, we began reporting our investment in Lion Oil using the cost method of
accounting. We carried our investment in Lion Oil at $131.6 million as of both September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008.
16
7. Long-Term Obligations and Short-Term Note Payable
Outstanding borrowings under Deleks existing debt instruments and capital lease obligations
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Senior secured credit facility term loan |
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
121.2 |
|
Senior secured credit facility revolver |
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Fifth Third revolver |
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Reliant Bank revolver |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Lehman note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
Promissory notes |
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
|
95.0 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341.5 |
|
|
|
286.0 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt, notes payable and capital lease obligations |
|
|
54.4 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
287.1 |
|
|
$ |
202.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility
The senior secured credit facility consists of a $120.0 million revolving credit facility and
$165.0 million term loan facility, which, as of September 30, 2009, had $29.7 million outstanding
under the revolver and $85.3 million outstanding under the term loan. As of September 30, 2009,
Fifth Third Bank, N.A. (Fifth Third) was the administrative agent and a lender under the facility.
On September 1, 2009, Fifth Third assumed the role of successor administrative agent under the
facility from the resigning administrative agent Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. (LCPI). During
September 2008, upon the bankruptcy filing of its parent company, LCPI informed Express that it
would not be funding its pro rata lender participation of future borrowings under the revolving
credit facility. Since the communication of its intention through the date of its resignation as
administrative agent, LCPI did not participate in any borrowings by Express under the revolving
credit facility. LCPIs commitment amount under the revolving credit facility is $12 million,
leaving Express with an effective revolving credit facility of $108.0 million. LCPI remains,
despite the September 1, 2009 amendment hereinafter discussed, a lender to Express under the term
loan facility. The unavailability of LCPIs pro rata lender participation in the revolving credit
facility has not had and is not expected to have a material impact on Express liquidity or its
operations.
Borrowings under the senior secured credit facility are secured by substantially all the
assets of Express and its subsidiaries. Letters of credit issued under the facility totaled $15.9
million as of September 30, 2009. The senior secured credit facility term loan requires quarterly
principal payments of 0.25% of the principal balance through March 31, 2011 and a balloon payment
of the remaining principal balance due upon maturity on April 28, 2011. We are also required to
make certain prepayments of this facility depending on excess cash flow as defined in the credit
agreement. In accordance with this excess cash flow calculation, we prepaid $19.7 million and $9.5
million in March 2009 and 2008, respectively. In June 2008, Express sold real property operated by
a third party for $3.9 million. In September 2008, Express sold its leasehold interest in a
location it operated for $4.5 million. The proceeds of the June sale, net of expenses, were used to
pay down the term loan, while the net proceeds of the September sale were retained, pursuant to the
terms of the facility, for asset reinvestment purposes. During the period from December 2008
through the quarter ended June 30, 2009, consistent with the terms of the December 3, 2008
amendment discussed below, Express disposed of 30 real property assets, of which 27 were located in
Virginia. The application of the proceeds from these asset sales, net of any amounts set aside
pursuant to the terms of the facility for reinvestment purposes, resulted in the prepayment of the
term loan facility in the amount of $19.5 million. During the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
Express disposed of an additional 16 non-core real estate assets, none of which were located in
Virginia. The application of the net proceeds from these asset sales resulted in the reduction of
debt under the overall facility in the amount of $9.1 million. The senior secured credit facility revolver
is payable in full upon maturity on April 28, 2010. The senior secured credit facility term and
senior secured credit facility revolver loans bear interest based on predetermined pricing grids
which allow us to choose between a Base Rate or Eurodollar rate. At September 30, 2009, the
weighted average borrowing rate was approximately 5.75% for the senior secured credit facility term
loan and 5.25% for the senior secured credit facility revolver. Additionally, the senior secured
credit facility requires us to pay a quarterly fee of 0.5% per year on the average available
revolving commitment under the senior secured credit facility revolver. Amounts available under the
senior secured revolver as of September 30, 2009 were approximately $62.3 million excluding the
commitment of LCPI as a lender under this facility.
On December 3, 2008, the credit facility was amended to allow for the disposition of specific
Express real and personal property assets in certain of its geographic operating regions. The
amendment also allows for additional asset sales of up to $35.0 million per calendar year subject
to such sales meeting certain financial criteria. Additionally, the amendment appointed Fifth Third
Bank as the
17
successor administrative agent subject to the resignation or removal of LCPI. As stated above,
the resignation of LCPI and the subsequent assumption of the role of administrative agent by Fifth
Third were consummated on September 1, 2009. On January 28, 2009, the credit facility was further
amended to allow for the one-time prepayment in the amount of $25.0 million toward the outstanding
principal of certain subordinated debt owed to Delek and incurred in conjunction with Deleks
purchase, through its Express subsidiary, of 107 retail fuel and convenience stores located in
northern Georgia and eastern Tennessee, and related assets, from the Calfee Company of Dalton, Inc.
and its affiliates in 2007 (the Calfee acquisition). Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the
$25.0 million prepayment was completed on March 5, 2009. The amendment also implemented a 100 basis
point credit spread increase across all tiers in the pricing grid and implemented a LIBOR rate
floor of 2.75% for all Eurodollar rate borrowings.
On September 1, 2009, the borrowers and lenders under the credit facility executed a
resignation and appointment agreement that consummated the resignation of LCPI as administrative
agent and swing line lender under the facility and the appointment of Fifth Third as the successor
administrative agent and successor swing line lender under the facility. The agreement also
clarifies that as long as LCPI remains a non-performing lender under
the credit facility, it has no voting rights and is not entitled to any fees under the facility.
Additionally, under the terms of the September 1, 2009 amendment, Express, along with other
relevant parties, released LCPI from any and all liabilities they may
have arising out of or in
connection with the credit facility, including LCPIs non-performance as a lender under the
facility.
We are required to comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants under the senior
secured credit facility. We believe we were in compliance with all covenant requirements as of
September 30, 2009.
SunTrust ABL Revolver
On October 13, 2006, we amended and restated our existing asset based revolving credit
facility. The amended and restated agreement, among other things, increased the size of the
facility from $250 to $300 million, including a $300 million sub-limit for letters of credit, and
extended the maturity of the facility by one year to April 28, 2010. The revolving credit agreement
bears interest based on predetermined pricing grids that allow us to choose between a Base Rate
or Eurodollar rate. Availability under the SunTrust ABL revolver is determined by a borrowing
base calculation defined in the credit agreement and is supported primarily by cash, certain
accounts receivable and inventory.
Effective December 15, 2008 and in light of the temporary suspension of our refining
operations, the SunTrust ABL revolver was amended to eliminate any need to maintain minimum levels
of borrowing base availability during all times that there are zero utilizations of credit (i.e.,
loans or letters of credit outstanding) under the facility. During times that there are outstanding
utilizations of credit under the facility, in the event that our availability (net of a $15.0
million availability block requirement) under the borrowing base is less than $30.0 million or less
than $15.0 million on any given measurement date, we become subject to certain reporting
obligations and certain covenants, respectively. Then, effective February 18, 2009, we further
amended the SunTrust ABL revolver to suspend the credit facility while the refinery was
non-operational. The amendment also provided for a series of conditions precedent to the renewed
access to the full terms of the credit facility while allowing for limited letter of credit access
during the restart phase of refinery operations. The amendment also added a covenant that requires
the restart, by September 30, 2009, of the refining operations at a prescribed throughput level to
last for a prescribed duration. This amendment also permitted the sale of refinerys pipeline and
tankage assets located outside of the refinery gates to a subsidiary of Marketing & Supply for net
proceeds of no less than $27.5 million which proceeds were required to be used in the refinery. The
sale of the assets was subsequently completed on March 31, 2009 for a total consideration of $29.7
million. The amendment also increased credit spreads by 125 basis points across all tiers of the
pricing grid and increased the commitment fees by up to 25 basis points. As of September 30, 2009,
we had satisfied all conditions precedent to the renewed access to the full terms of the credit
facility and therefore full access had been restored. We believe we were in compliance with all
covenant requirements under this facility as of September 30, 2009.
The SunTrust ABL revolver primarily supports our issuance of letters of credit used in
connection with the purchases of crude oil for use in our refinery. Such letter of credit usage and
any borrowings under the facility may at no time exceed the aggregate borrowing capacity available
under the SunTrust ABL revolver. As of September 30, 2009, we had no outstanding loans under the
agreement but had letters of credit issued under the facility totaling approximately $120.9
million. Borrowing capacity, as calculated and reported under the terms of the SunTrust
ABL revolver, net of a $15.0 million availability block requirement, as of September 30, 2009 was
$36.1 million.
The SunTrust ABL revolver contains certain customary non-financial covenants, including a
negative covenant that prohibits us from creating, incurring or assuming any liens, mortgages,
pledges, security interests or other similar arrangements against the property, plant and equipment
of the refinery, subject to customary exceptions for certain permitted liens.
18
Fifth Third Revolver
On July 27, 2006, Delek executed a short-term revolver with Fifth Third Bank, as
administrative agent, in the amount of $50.0 million. The proceeds of this revolver were used to
fund the working capital needs of the newly formed subsidiary, Delek Marketing & Supply, LP. The
Fifth Third revolver initially had a maturity date of July 30, 2007, but on July 27, 2007 the
maturity was extended until January 31, 2008. On December 19, 2007, we amended and restated our
existing revolving credit facility. The amended and restated agreement, among other things,
increased the size of the facility from $50.0 to $75.0 million, including a $25.0 million sub-limit
for letters of credit, and extended the maturity of the facility to December 19, 2012. On October
17, 2008, the agreement was further amended to permit the payment of a one-time distribution of
$20.0 million from the borrower, Delek Marketing & Supply, LP, a subsidiary of Marketing to Delek,
increase the size of the sub-limit for letters of credit to $35.0 million and reduce the leverage
ratio financial covenant limit.
On March 31, 2009, the credit agreement was amended to permit the use of facility proceeds for
the purchase of the crude pipeline and tankage assets of the refinery that are located outside the
gates of the refinery and which are used to supply substantially all of the necessary crude
feedstock to the refinery from the refining subsidiary to a newly-formed subsidiary of Delek
Marketing & Supply LP. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the purchase of the crude pipeline
and tankage assets was completed on March 31, 2009 for a total consideration of $29.7 million, all
of which was borrowed from the Fifth Third revolver. The amendment also increased credit spreads by
up to 225 basis points and commitment fees by up to 20 basis points across the various tiers of the
pricing grid. In addition, on May 6, 2009, the credit agreement was further amended, effective
March 31, 2009, related to the definition of certain covenant terms.
The revolver bears interest based on predetermined pricing grids that allow us to choose
between Base Rate or Eurodollar rate loans. Borrowings under the Fifth Third revolver are
secured by substantially all of the assets of Delek Marketing & Supply LP. As of September 30,
2009, we had $53.7 million outstanding borrowings under the facility at a weighted average
borrowing rate of 3.8%. We also had letters of credit issued under the facility of $10.0 million as
of September 30, 2009. Amounts available under the Fifth Third revolver as of September 30, 2009
were approximately $11.3 million.
We are required to comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants under this
revolver. We believe we were in compliance with all covenant requirements as of September 30, 2009.
Lehman Credit Agreement
On March 30, 2007, Delek entered into a credit agreement with Lehman Commercial Paper Inc.
(LCPI) as administrative agent. Through March 30, 2009, LCPI remained the administrative agent
under this facility. The credit agreement provided for unsecured loans of $65.0 million, the
proceeds of which were used to pay a portion of the costs for the Calfee acquisition in April 2007.
In December 2008, a related party to the borrower, Finance, purchased a participating stake in the
loan outstanding as permitted under the terms of the agreement. At a consolidated level, this
resulted in a gain of $1.6 million on the extinguishment of debt. The loans matured on March 30,
2009 and the facility was repaid in full on the maturity date.
Promissory Notes
On July 27, 2006, Delek executed a three year promissory note in favor of Bank Leumi USA (Bank
Leumi) in the amount of $30.0 million (2006 Leumi Note). The proceeds of this note were used
to fund an acquisition and working capital needs. On June 23, 2009, this note was amended to extend
the maturity date to January 3, 2011 and require quarterly principal amortization in amounts of
$2.0 million beginning on April 1, 2010, with a balloon payment of the remaining principal amount
due at maturity. As amended, the note bears interest at the greater of a fixed spread over 3 month
LIBOR or an interest rate floor of 4.5%. The amendment also introduced certain financial and
non-financial covenants and requires a perfected collateral pledge of Deleks shares in Lion Oil by
January 4, 2010. The shares to be pledged will secure any Delek debt obligations outstanding on
January 4, 2010 under all current promissory notes from Bank Leumi as
well as current promissory notes from the Israel Discount
Bank of New York (IDB) on a pari passu basis in accordance with the terms of an intercreditor
agreement and the stock pledge agreements executed on June 23, 2009 between Bank Leumi, IDB, and
Delek. As of September 30, 2009, the weighted average borrowing rate for amounts borrowed under
this note was 4.5%. We are required to comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants
under the 2006 Leumi Note, as amended. We believe we were in compliance with all covenant
requirements as of September 30, 2009.
On May 12, 2008, Delek executed a second promissory note in favor of Bank Leumi for $20.0
million, maturing on May 11, 2011 (2008 Leumi Note). The proceeds of this note were used to
reduce short term debt and for working capital needs. This note was
19
amended in December 2008 to change the financial covenant calculation methodology and
applicability. The note was further amended on June 23, 2009 to require quarterly principal
amortization in the amount of $1.0 million beginning on July 1, 2010, with a balloon payment of the
remaining principal amount due at maturity. The amendment also modified certain financial and
non-financial covenants and requires a perfected collateral pledge of Deleks shares in Lion Oil by
January 4, 2010, as discussed above. As amended, the note bears interest at the greater of a fixed
spread over LIBOR for periods of 30 or 90 days, as elected by the borrower, or an interest rate
floor of 4.5%. As of September 30, 2009, the weighted average borrowing rate for amounts borrowed
under this note was 4.5%. We are required to comply with certain financial and non-financial
covenants under the note, as amended. We believe we were in compliance with all covenant
requirements as of September 30, 2009.
On May 23, 2006, Delek executed a $30.0 million promissory note in favor of IDB (2006 IDB
Note). The proceeds of this note were used to repay the then existing promissory notes in favor of
IDB and Bank Leumi. On December 30, 2008, the 2006 IDB Note was amended and restated. As amended
and restated, the 2006 IDB Note matures on December 31, 2011 and requires quarterly principal
amortization in amounts of $1.25 million beginning on March 31, 2010, with a balloon payment of
remaining principal amount due at maturity. The amendment also
introduced certain financial and non-financial covenants. The 2006 IDB Note bears interest at the greater of a
fixed spread over 3 month LIBOR or an interest rate floor of
5.0%. Additionally, on June 23, 2009, Delek agreed to pledge its shares in
Lion Oil by January 4, 2010, to secure its obligations under the
2006 IDB Note, in pari passu with certain other notes, as discussed above. As of September 30, 2009, the weighted average
borrowing rate for amounts borrowed under the 2006 IDB Note was 5.0%. We believe we were in
compliance with all covenant requirements as of September 30, 2009.
On December 30, 2008, Delek executed a second promissory note in favor of IDB for $15.0
million (2008 IDB Note). The proceeds of this note were used to repay the then existing note in
favor of Delek Petroleum. This note matures on December 31, 2009 and is reflected in notes payable
on the accompanying consolidated statement of position. The note bears interest at the greater of a
fixed spread over 3 month LIBOR or an interest rate floor of
5.0%. Additionally, on June 23, 2009, Delek agreed to
pledge its shares in Lion Oil by January 4, 2010 to
secure its obligations under the 2008 IDB Note, in pari passu with
certain other notes, as discussed above. As of September 30, 2009, the
weighted average borrowing rate for amounts borrowed under the note was 5.0%. We are required to
comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants under the note. We believe we were in
compliance with all covenant requirements as of September 30, 2009.
On September 29, 2009, Delek executed a promissory note in favor of Delek Petroleum, Ltd.
(Delek Petroleum), an Israeli corporation controlled by our beneficial majority stockholder, Delek
Group, in the amount of $65.0 million for general corporate
purposes. The note
matures on October 1, 2010 and bears interest at 8.5% (net of any applicable withholding taxes)
payable on a quarterly basis. Additionally, the lender has the option, any time after December 31,
2009, to elect a one-time adjustment to the functional currency of the principal amount. The note
also provides the lender the option to make an adjustment to the interest rate, once during the
note life; provided, however, that such adjustment cannot exceed the then prevailing market interest rate. The note is
unsecured. The loan is prepayable in whole or in part at any time
without penalty or premium at the borrowers election.
Reliant Bank Revolver
On March 28, 2008, we entered into a revolving credit agreement with Reliant Bank, a Tennessee
bank, headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee. The credit agreement provides for unsecured loans of
up to $12.0 million. As of September 30, 2009 we had $12.0 million outstanding under this facility
at a weighted average borrowing rate of 2.8%. The facility matures on March 28, 2011 and bears
interest at a fixed spread over the 30 day LIBOR rate. This agreement was amended in September 2008
to conform certain portions of the financial covenant definition to those contained in some of our
other credit agreements. We are required to comply with certain financial and non-financial
covenants under this revolver. We believe we were in compliance with all covenant requirements as
of September 30, 2009.
Letters of Credit
As of September 30, 2009, Delek had in place letters of credit totaling approximately $150.8
million with various financial institutions securing obligations with respect to its workers
compensation self-insurance programs, as well as purchases of crude oil for the refinery, gasoline
and diesel for the marketing segment and fuel for our retail fuel and convenience stores. No
amounts were outstanding under these facilities at September 30, 2009.
20
Interest-Rate Derivative Instruments
Delek had interest rate cap agreements in place totaling $60.0 million and $73.8 million of
notional principal amounts at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. These
agreements are intended to economically hedge floating rate debt related to our current borrowings
under the Senior Secured Credit Facility. However, as we have elected to not apply the permitted
hedge accounting treatment, including formal hedge designation and documentation, in accordance
with the provisions of ASC 815 the fair value of the derivatives is recorded in other non-current
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets with the offset recognized in earnings. The
derivative instruments mature in July 2010. The estimated fair value of our interest rate
derivatives at both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was nominal.
In accordance with ASC 815 we recorded non-cash expense (income) representing the change in
estimated fair value of the interest rate cap agreements of nominal amounts for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, and $0.1 million and $0.8 million for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
While Delek has not elected to apply permitted hedge accounting treatment for these interest
rate derivatives in accordance with the provisions of ASC 815 in the past, we may choose to elect
that treatment in future transactions.
8. Stock Based Compensation
In April 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the Delek US Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the Plan) pursuant to which we may issue an aggregate of 3,053,392 shares of our
Common Stock. Under the terms of the Plan, we may grant stock options, stock appreciation rights
(SARs), restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs) and other stock-based awards to certain
directors, officers, employees, consultants and other individuals who perform services for us or
our affiliates. The options granted under the Plan are non-qualified and granted at market price or
higher. All of the options granted require continued service as a condition to vesting except that
the vesting of stock-based awards granted to two executive employees could, under certain
circumstances, accelerate upon termination of their employment.
On May 13, 2009, we filed a Tender Offer statement that gave eligible employees and directors
the ability to exchange outstanding options under the Plan with per share exercise prices ranging
between $16.00 and $35.08, for new options under the Plan to purchase fewer shares of our common
stock at a lower exercise price. This offer expired on June 10, 2009 and we accepted for exchange
options to purchase an aggregate of 1,398,641 shares of our common stock, representing 84.28% of
the 1,659,589 shares covered by eligible options. We granted replacement options to purchase
803,385 shares of common stock in exchange for the tendered options. The exercise price per share
of each replacement option granted pursuant to the Offer was $9.17, the closing price of our common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date, June 10, 2009. This modification resulted
in an additional $0.1 million in stock-based compensation expense, which will be recognized over
the remaining terms of the original options granted. Prior to the Tender Offer, approximately 75%
of grants under the Plan vested ratably over a period between three to five years and approximately
25% of the grants vested at the end of the fourth year. Following the Tender Offer, we expect that
most new awards granted under the Plan will vest ratably over a period of four years.
On September 25, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with our President and Chief
Executive Officer, Mr. Yemin, which contains a deferred compensation element. Under the terms of
the Agreement, Mr. Yemin was granted 1,850,040 SARs under the Plan on September 30, 2009. The SARs
vest over a period of approximately four years. 640,440 of the SARs are subject to a base price of
$8.57 per share (the fair market value at the date of grant), 246,400 SARs each are subject to base
prices of $12.40, $13.20, $14.00, and $14.80 per share and the remaining 224,000 SARs are subject
to a base price of $15.60 per share. The SARs will expire upon the earlier of the first
anniversary of Mr. Yemins termination of employment or October 31, 2014 (the first anniversary of
the expiration of the agreement). The SARs may be settled in shares of Common Stock or cash at
Deleks sole discretion.
Compensation Expense Related to Equity-based Awards
Compensation expense for the equity-based awards amounted to $0.6 million ($0.4 million, net
of taxes) and $2.3 million ($1.5 million, net of taxes), respectively, for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and $0.8 million ($0.5 million, net of taxes) and $2.5 million
($1.7 million, net of taxes), respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
These amounts are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
As of September 30, 2009, there was $6.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
21
9. Segment Data
We report our operating results in three reportable segments: refining, marketing and retail.
Decisions concerning the allocation of resources and assessment of operating performance are made
based on this segmentation. Management measures the operating performance of each of its reportable
segments based on the segment contribution margin.
Segment contribution margin is defined as net sales less cost of sales and operating expenses,
excluding depreciation and amortization. Operations which are not specifically included in the
reportable segments are included in the corporate and other category, which primarily consists of
operating expenses, depreciation and amortization expense and interest income and expense
associated with corporate headquarters.
The refining segment processes crude oil that is transported through our crude oil pipeline
and an unrelated third-party pipeline. The refinery processes the crude and other purchased
feedstocks for the manufacture of transportation motor fuels including various grades of gasoline,
diesel fuel, aviation fuel and other petroleum-based products that are distributed through its
product terminal located at the refinery.
Our marketing segment sells refined products on a wholesale basis in west Texas through
company-owned and third-party operated terminals. This segment also provides marketing services to
the Tyler refinery.
In order to more appropriately align business activities, certain pipeline assets which had
been held and managed by the refining segment were sold to the marketing segment on March 31, 2009.
These assets and their earnings streams are now reflected in the activities of the marketing
segment.
Our retail segment markets gasoline, diesel, other refined petroleum products and convenience
merchandise through a network of company-operated retail fuel and convenience stores throughout the
southeastern United States. As of September 30, 2009, we had 443 stores in total consisting of 248
located in Tennessee, 94 in Alabama, 81 in Georgia, and 13 in Arkansas. The remaining 7 stores are
located in Kentucky, Louisiana and Mississippi. The retail fuel and convenience stores operate
under Deleks brand names MAPCO
Express®,
MAPCO
Mart®,
Discount Food
Marttm,
Fast Food and Fueltm and Favorite Markets® brands. Additionally, we operated 9
retail fuel and convenience stores in Virginia under the East Coast® brand, which were classified
as held for sale as of September 30, 2009. The operating results for these stores, in all periods
presented herein, have been included in discontinued operations. In the retail segment, management
reviews operating results on a divisional basis, where a division represents a specific geographic
market. These divisional operating segments exhibit similar economic characteristics, provide the
same products and services, and operate in a manner such that aggregation of these operations
is appropriate for segment presentation.
Our refining business has a services agreement with our marketing segment, which among other
things, requires the refining segment to pay service fees to the marketing segment based on the
number of gallons sold at the Tyler refinery and a sharing of a portion of the marketing margin
achieved in return for providing marketing, sales and customer services. This intercompany
transaction fee was $1.2 million and $8.6 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and $4.8 million and $10.8 million in the three and nine months ended September
30, 2008, respectively. Additionally, in April 2009, the refining segment began paying crude
transportation and storage fees to the marketing segment, relating to the utilization of certain
crude pipeline assets. These fees were $2.4 million and $4.4 million during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, refining sold finished product to marketing in the amount of $3.3 million. There were no
such sales during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. All inter-segment
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
22
The following is a summary of business segment operating performance as measured by
contribution margin for the period indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
366.1 |
|
|
$ |
365.2 |
|
|
$ |
86.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
817.9 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
347.5 |
|
|
|
315.1 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
745.1 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
55.6 |
|
Insurance proceeds business interruption |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Property damage proceeds, net |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
554.0 |
|
|
$ |
434.6 |
|
|
$ |
67.4 |
|
|
$ |
210.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,266.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail(1) |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
675.3 |
|
|
$ |
506.9 |
|
|
$ |
220.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,402.5 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
612.8 |
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
|
|
217.4 |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
1,271.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
457.1 |
|
|
$ |
505.2 |
|
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
195.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,242.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
528.2 |
|
|
$ |
990.5 |
|
|
$ |
246.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,766.1 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
465.6 |
|
|
|
858.6 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
1,562.9 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
154.8 |
|
Insurance proceeds business interruption |
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
Property damage proceeds, net |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
86.1 |
|
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
137.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
142.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail(1) |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
1,868.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,454.3 |
|
|
$ |
633.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,957.1 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
1,723.4 |
|
|
|
1,304.1 |
|
|
|
625.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3,654.7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
75.5 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
57.7 |
|
|
$ |
47.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
73.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Retail operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 have
been restated to reflect the reclassification of the Virginia stores to discontinued
operations. |
10. Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for its measurement and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. We elected to implement this statement with the one-year
deferral permitted by ASC 820 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair
value, except those that are recognized or disclosed on a recurring basis (at least annually). The
deferral applies to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in a business
combination; impaired properties, plant and equipment; intangible assets and goodwill; and initial
recognition of asset retirement obligations and restructuring costs for which we use fair value. We
adopted ASC 820 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value
effective January 1, 2009. Because we do not hold any non-financial assets or liabilities measured
at fair value, this adoption did not impact to our consolidated financial statements.
ASC 820 applies to our interest rate and commodity derivatives that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis. The standard also requires that we assess the impact of nonperformance risk
on our derivatives. Nonperformance risk is not considered material at this time.
ASC 820 requires disclosures that categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value
into one of three different levels depending on the observability of the inputs employed in the
measurement. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 2 inputs are observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market-corroborated inputs. Level
3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability reflecting our assumptions about
pricing by market participants.
We value our available for sale investments using unadjusted closing prices provided by the
NYSE as of the balance sheet date, and these would be classified as Level 1 in the fair value
hierarchy. OTC commodity swaps, physical commodity purchase and sale contracts and interest rate
swaps are generally valued using industry-standard models that consider various assumptions,
including quoted forward prices for interest rates, time value, volatility factors and contractual
prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. The degree to
which these inputs are observable in the forward markets determines the classification as Level 2
or 3. Our contracts are valued using quotations provided by brokers based on exchange pricing
and/or price index developers such as PLATTS or ARGUS. These are classified as Level 2.
24
The fair value hierarchy for our financial assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a
recurring basis at September 30, 2009, was (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The derivative values above are based on analysis of each contract as the fundamental unit of
account as required by ASC 820. Derivative assets and liabilities with the same counterparty are
not netted, where the legal right of offset exists. This differs from the presentation in the
financial statements which reflects the companys policy under the guidance of ASC 815-10-45,
wherein we have elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative
instruments executed with the same counterparty. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively, $10.1 million and $26.9 million of net derivative positions are included in other
current assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2009,
$0.9 million of cash collateral is held by counterparty brokerage firms. These amounts have been
netted with the net derivative positions with each counterparty.
11. Derivative Instruments
From time to time, Delek enters into swaps, forwards, futures and option contracts for the
following purposes:
|
|
|
To limit the exposure to price fluctuations for physical purchases and sales of crude oil
and finished products in the normal course of business; and |
|
|
|
|
To limit the exposure to floating-rate fluctuations on current borrowings. |
We use derivatives to reduce normal operating and market risks with a primary objective in
derivative instrument use being the reduction of the impact of market price volatility on our
results of operations. The following discussion provides additional details regarding the types of
derivative contracts held during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Swaps
In December 2007, in conjunction with providing E-10 products in our retail markets, we
entered into a series of OTC swaps based on the futures price of ethanol as quoted on the Chicago
Board of Trade, which fixed the purchase price of ethanol for a predetermined number of gallons at
future dates from April 2008 through December 2009. We also entered into a series of OTC swaps
based on the future price of unleaded gasoline as quoted on the NYMEX, which fixed the sales price
of unleaded gasoline for a predetermined number of gallons at future dates from April 2008 through
December 2009. Delek recognized gains (losses) of $8.7 million and $(1.8) million, respectively,
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. These gains and losses were included as
an adjustment to cost of goods sold in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations. There were no gains or losses recognized on these swaps during the three or nine
months ended September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, total unrealized
gains of $1.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively, are held as other current assets on the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
In March 2008, we entered into a series of OTC swaps based on the future price of West Texas
Intermediate Crude (WTI) as quoted on the NYMEX which fixed the purchase price of WTI for a
predetermined number of barrels at future dates from July 2008 through December 2009. We also
entered into a series of OTC swaps based on the future price of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) as
quoted on the Gulf Coast ULSD PLATTS which fixed the sales price of ULSD for a predetermined number
of gallons at future dates from July 2008 through December 2009.
In accordance with ASC 815, the WTI and ULSD swaps were designated as cash flow hedges with
the change in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income. However, as of November 20, 2008,
due to the suspension of operations at the refinery, the cash flow designation was removed because
the probability of occurrence of the hedged forecasted transactions for the period of the shutdown
became remote. All changes in the fair value of these swaps subsequent to November 20, 2008 have
been recognized in the statement of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, we recognized (losses) gains of $(0.2) million and
25
$10.0 million, respectively, which are included as an adjustment to cost of goods sold in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations as a result of the discontinuation of these cash
flow hedges. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, Delek recorded unrealized
gains (losses) as a component of other comprehensive income of $14.2 million ($8.8 million, net of
deferred taxes) and $(8.1) million ($(5.4) million, net of deferred taxes), respectively, related
to the change in the fair value of these swaps. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
Delek had total unrealized losses, net of deferred income taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive
income of $0.2 million and $0.6 million associated with these hedges. The fair value of these
contracts remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income will be recognized in income as the
positions are closed and the hedged transactions are recognized in income. As of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, total unrealized gains of $8.2 million and $11.6 million, respectively,
are held as other current assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Forward Fuel Contracts
From time to time, Delek enters into forward fuel contracts with major financial institutions
that fix the purchase price of finished grade fuel for a predetermined number of units at a future
date and have fulfillment terms of less than 90 days. Delek recognized losses of $0.5 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and gains of
$2.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, which are included as an adjustment to cost of goods sold in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, total
unrealized gains (losses) of $0.2 million and $(0.8) million, respectively, are held as other
current assets (liabilities) on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Options
In the first quarter of 2008, Delek entered into a put option with a major financial
institution that fixes the sales price of crude oil for a predetermined number of units, which
expired in December 2008. Delek recognized gains (losses) of $0.3 million and $(0.1) million,
respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, which are included as an
adjustment to cost of goods sold in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations. There were no option contracts outstanding during the three or nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Futures Contracts
From time to time, Delek enters into futures contracts with major financial institutions that
fix the purchase price of crude oil and the sales price of finished grade fuel for a predetermined
number of units at a future date and have fulfillment terms of less than 90 days. Delek recognized
gains (losses) of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009, and $2.2 million and $(5.4) million, respectively, during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, which are included as an adjustment to cost of goods sold in
the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, total unrealized gains (losses) of $(0.2) million and $0.1 million,
respectively, are held as other current assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
From time to time, Delek also enters into futures contracts with fuel supply vendors that
secure supply of product to be purchased for use in the normal course of business at our refining
and retail segments. These contracts are priced based on an index that is clearly and closely
related to the product being purchased, contain no net settlement provisions and typically qualify
under the normal purchase exemption from derivative accounting treatment under ASC 815.
Due to the suspension of operations at the refinery in November 2008, Delek was unable to take
delivery under the refining contracts covering the period of the refinery shutdown and settled
these contracts net with the vendors, even though no net settlement provisions exist. Therefore,
Delek discontinued the normal purchase exemption under ASC 815 for the refining contracts covering
the periods from January 2009 through April 2009. Delek has recognized losses $2.0 million relating
to the market value of these contracts for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. There were no
futures contracts recorded at fair value under ASC 815 during the three or nine months ended
September 30, 2008. As of December 31, 2008, total unrealized gains of $5.4 million were held as
other current assets on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. There were no
outstanding contracts as of September 30, 2009.
26
Interest Rate Instruments
From time to time, Delek enters into interest rate swap and cap agreements that are intended
to economically hedge floating rate debt related to our current borrowings. These interest rate
derivative instruments are discussed in conjunction with our long term debt in Note 7.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
In the ordinary conduct of our business, we are from time to time subject to lawsuits,
investigations and claims, including, environmental claims and employee related matters. In
addition, the EPA is conducting an inspection under Section 114 of the Clean Air Act concerning the
explosion and fire that occurred at the Tyler refinery on November 20, 2008 and certain private
parties who claim they were adversely affected by this incident have commenced litigation against
us. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations
and claims asserted against us, including civil penalties or other enforcement actions, we do not
believe that any currently pending legal proceeding or proceedings to which we are a party will
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Self-insurance
Delek is self-insured for employee medical claims up to $0.1 million per employee per year or
an aggregate cost exposure of approximately $5.5 million per year.
Delek is self-insured for workers compensation claims up to $1.0 million on a per accident
basis. We self-insure for general liability claims up to $4.0 million on a per occurrence basis. We
self-insure for auto liability up to $4.0 million on a per accident basis.
We have umbrella liability insurance available to each of our segments in an amount determined
reasonable by management.
Environmental Health and Safety
Delek is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws. These laws raise
potential exposure to future claims and lawsuits involving environmental matters which could
include soil and water contamination, air pollution, personal injury and property damage allegedly
caused by substances which we manufactured, handled, used, released or disposed, or that relate to
pre-existing conditions for which we have assumed responsibility. While it is often difficult to
quantify future environmental-related expenditures, Delek anticipates that continuing capital
investments will be required for the foreseeable future to comply with existing regulations.
Based upon environmental evaluations performed internally and by third parties subsequent to
our purchase of the Tyler refinery, we have recorded a liability of approximately $7.0 million as
of September 30, 2009 relative to the probable estimated costs of remediating or otherwise
addressing certain environmental issues of a non-capital nature. This liability includes estimated
costs for on-going investigation and remediation efforts for known contamination of soil and
groundwater which were already being performed by the former owner, as well as estimated costs for
additional issues which have been identified subsequent to the purchase. Approximately $3.1 million
of the liability is expected to be expended over the next 12 months with the remaining balance of
$3.9 million expendable by 2022.
In late 2004, the prior refinery owner began discussions with the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding
certain Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements at the refinery. The prior refinery owner expected to
settle the matter with EPA and the DOJ by the end of 2005, however, the negotiations were not
finalized until July 2009. A consent decree was entered by the Court and became effective on
September 23, 2009. The consent decree does not allege any violations by Delek subsequent to the
purchase of the refinery and the prior owner is responsible for payment of the assessed penalty.
The capital projects required by the consent decree have either been completed (such as a new
electrical substation to increase operational reliability and additional sulfur removal capacity to
address upsets) or will not have a material adverse effect upon our future financial results. In
addition, the consent decree requires certain on-going operational changes that will increase
future operating expenses at the refinery. We believe any such costs will not have a material
adverse effect upon our business, financial condition or operations.
27
In October 2007, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) approved an Agreed Order
that resolved alleged violations of certain air rules that had continued after the Tyler refinery
was acquired. The Agreed Order required the refinery to pay a penalty and fund a Supplemental
Environmental Project for which we had previously reserved adequate amounts. In addition, the
refinery was required to implement certain corrective measures, which the company is scheduled to
complete as specified in Agreed Order Docket No. 2006-1433-AIR-E, with one exception. In a letter
dated July 31, 2009, the TCEQ confirmed that Delek is no longer required to install a continuous
emission monitoring system (CEMS) on the wastewater flare at the Tyler refinery under the Agreed
Order due to an amendment to the EPA regulation, on which the requirement was based.
Contemporaneous with the refinery purchase, Delek became a party to a Waiver and Compliance
Plan with the EPA that extended the implementation deadline for low sulfur gasoline from January 1,
2006 to May 2008, based on the capital investment option we chose. In return for the extension, we
agreed to produce 95% of the diesel fuel at the refinery with a sulfur content of 15 ppm or less by
June 1, 2006 through the remainder of the term of the Waiver. During the first quarter of 2008, it
became apparent to us that the construction of our gasoline hydrotreater would not be completed by
the original deadline of May 31, 2008 due to the continuing shortage of skilled labor and ongoing
delays in the receipt of equipment. We began discussions with EPA regarding this potential delay in
the completion of the gasoline hydrotreater and EPA agreed to extend certain provisions of the
Waiver that allowed us to exceed the 80 ppm per-gallon sulfur maximum for up to two months past the
original May 31, 2008 compliance date. Construction and commissioning of the gasoline hydrotreater
was completed in June 2008 and all gasoline has met low sulfur specifications since the end of
June. All requirements of the Waiver and Compliance Plan have been completed and EPA terminated the
Waiver in early June, 2009.
The EPA has issued final rules for gasoline formulation that will require further reductions
in benzene content by 2011. We have identified and evaluated options for complying with this
requirement and are now in the preliminary design phase for the selected option.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires increasing amounts of renewable fuel to be incorporated
into the gasoline pool through 2012. Under final rules implementing this Act (the Renewable Fuel
Standard), the Tyler refinery is classified as a small refinery exempt from renewable fuel
standards through 2010. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 increased the amounts of
renewable fuel required by the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The EPA has not promulgated implementing
rules for the 2007 Act so it is not yet possible to determine what the Tyler refinery compliance
requirement will be. Although temporarily exempt from this rule, the Tyler refinery began supplying
an E-10 gasoline-ethanol blend in January 2008.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known
as Superfund, imposes liability, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct,
on certain classes of persons who are considered to be responsible for the release of a hazardous
substance into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of the disposal site
or sites where the release occurred and companies that disposed or arranged for the disposal of the
hazardous substances. Under CERCLA, such persons may be subject to joint and several liabilities
for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment,
for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. It is not uncommon
for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property
damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances or other pollutants released into the environment.
Analogous state laws impose similar responsibilities and liabilities on responsible parties. In the
course of the refinerys ordinary operations, waste is generated, some of which falls within the
statutory definition of a hazardous substance and some of which may have been disposed of at
sites that may require cleanup under Superfund. At this time, we have not been named as a
potentially responsible party at any Superfund sites and under the terms of the refinery purchase
agreement, we did not assume any liability for wastes disposed of at third party owned treatment,
storage or disposal sites prior to our ownership.
In June 2007, OSHA announced that, under a National Emphasis Program (NEP) addressing
workplace hazards at petroleum refineries, it would conduct inspections of process safety
management programs at approximately 80 refineries nationwide. OSHA conducted an NEP inspection at
our Tyler, Texas refinery between February and August of 2008 and issued citations assessing an
aggregate penalty of less than $0.1 million. We are contesting the NEP citations. Between November
2008 and May 2009, OSHA conducted another inspection at our Tyler refinery as a result of the
explosion and fire that occurred there and issued citations assessing an aggregate penalty of
approximately $0.2 million. We are also contesting these citations and do not believe that the
outcome of any pending OSHA citations (whether alone or in the aggregate) will have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition to OSHA, the Chemical Safety Board (CSB) also requested information pertaining to
the November 2008 incident and the EPA has requested information pertaining to our compliance with
the chemical accident prevention standards of the Clean Air Act.
28
The investigations by the CSB and EPA are ongoing.
Vendor Commitments
Delek maintains an agreement with a significant vendor that requires the purchase of certain
general merchandise exclusively from this vendor over a specified period of time. Additionally, we
maintain agreements with certain fuel suppliers which contain terms which generally require the
purchase of predetermined quantities of third-party branded fuel for a specified period of time. In
certain fuel vendor contracts, penalty provisions exist if minimum quantities are not met.
Letters of Credit
As of September 30, 2009, Delek had in place letters of credit totaling approximately $150.8
million with various financial institutions securing obligations with respect to its workers
compensation self-insurance programs, as well as purchases of crude oil for the refinery, gasoline
and diesel for the marketing segment and fuel for our retail fuel and convenience stores. No
amounts were outstanding under these facilities at September 30, 2009.
13. Related Party Transactions
At September 30, 2009, Delek Group beneficially owned approximately 73.8% of our outstanding
common stock. As a result, Delek Group and its controlling shareholder, Mr. Itshak Sharon (Tshuva),
will continue to control the election of our directors, influence our corporate and management
policies and determine, without the consent of our other stockholders, the outcome of any corporate
transaction or other matter submitted to our stockholders for approval, including potential mergers
or acquisitions, asset sales and other significant corporate transactions.
On September 29, 2009, Delek executed a promissory note in favor of Delek Petroleum in the
amount of $65.0 million. The note matures on October 1, 2010 and bears interest at 8.5% (net of
any applicable withholding taxes) payable on a quarterly basis.
Additionally, the lender has the option, any time after
December 31, 2009, to elect a one-time adjustment to the
functional currency of the principal amount. The note also provides
the lender the option to make an adjustment to the interest rate,
once during the note life, but that adjustment cannot exceed the then
prevailing market interest rate. The
note is unsecured. The loan is prepayable in whole or in part at any
time without penalty or premium at the borrowers election.
In December 2008, Finance, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delek, borrowed $15 million from Delek
Petroleum. The interest rate was LIBOR plus 4% and the debt was fully repaid on December 31, 2008.
On January 22, 2007, we granted 28,000 stock options to Gabriel Last, one of our directors,
under our 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan. These options vest ratably over four years, have an
exercise price of $16.00 per share and will expire on January 22, 2017. The grant to Mr. Last was a
special, one-time grant in consideration of his supervision and direction of management and
consulting services provided to us by Delek Group. The grant was not compensation for his service
as a director. This grant does not mark the adoption of a policy to compensate our non-employee
related directors and we do not intend to issue further grants to Mr. Last in the future.
On December 10, 2006, we granted 28,000 stock options to Asaf Bartfeld, one of our directors,
under our 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan. These options vest ratably over four years and have an
exercise price of $17.64 per share and will expire on December 10, 2016. The grant to Mr. Bartfeld
was a special, one-time grant in consideration of his supervision and direction of management and
consulting services provided to us by Delek Group. The grant was not compensation for his service
as a director. This grant does not mark the adoption of a policy to compensate our non-employee
related directors and we do not intend to issue further grants to Mr. Bartfeld in the future.
On January 12, 2006, we entered into a consulting agreement with Charles H. Green, the father
of one of our named executive officers, Frederec Green. Under the terms of the agreement, Charles
Green provides assistance and guidance, primarily in the area of electrical reliability, at our
Tyler refinery, and is paid $100 per hour for services rendered. We paid nominal amounts to Mr.
Green in 2009 and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for these services during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2006, Delek entered into a management and consulting agreement with Delek
Group, pursuant to which key management personnel of Delek Group provide management and consulting
services to Delek, including matters relating to long-term planning, operational issues and
financing strategies. The agreement had an initial term of one year and continues thereafter until
either party terminates the agreement upon 30 days advance notice. As compensation, the agreement
provides for payment to Delek
29
Group of $125 thousand per calendar quarter payable within 90 days of the end of each quarter
and reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket costs and expenses incurred.
As of May 1, 2005, Delek entered into a consulting agreement with Greenfeld-Energy Consulting,
Ltd., (Greenfeld) a company owned and controlled by one of Deleks directors. Under the terms of
the agreement, the director personally provides consulting services relating to the refining
industry and Greenfeld receives monthly consideration and reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
From May 2005 through August 2005, Delek paid Greenfeld approximately $7 thousand per month. Since
September 2005, Delek has paid Greenfeld a monthly payment of approximately $8 thousand. In April
2006, Delek paid Greenfeld a bonus of $70 thousand for services rendered in 2005. Pursuant to the
agreement, on May 3, 2006, we granted Mr. Greenfeld options to purchase 130,000 shares of our
common stock at $16.00 per share, our initial public offering price, pursuant to our 2006 Long-Term
Incentive Plan. These options vest ratably over five years. The agreement continues in effect until
terminated by either party upon six months advance notice to the other party.
14. Subsequent Events
Dividend Declaration
On November 4, 2009, our Board of Directors voted to declare a quarterly cash dividend of
$0.0375 per share, payable on December 15, 2009 to shareholders of record on November 24, 2009.
Subsequent Event Evaluation
We have evaluated subsequent events from September 30, 2009 through the date of the filing of
this Form-10Q on November 6, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued. No material
subsequent events have occurred during this time which would require recognition in the condensed
consolidated financial statements or footnotes as of and for the three or nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
30
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL POSITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
is managements analysis of our financial performance and of significant trends that may affect our
future performance. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in the Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 9, 2009. Those statements in the MD&A that are not historical in nature
should be deemed forward-looking statements that are inherently uncertain.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward looking statements that reflect our current estimates,
expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities.
Forward-looking statements include, among other things, the information concerning our possible
future results of operations, business and growth strategies, financing plans, expectations that
regulatory developments or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business or
financial condition, our competitive position and the effects of competition, the projected growth
of the industry in which we operate, and the benefits and synergies to be obtained from our
completed and any future acquisitions, and statements of managements goals and objectives, and
other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Words such as may,
will, should, could, would, predicts, potential, continue, expects, anticipates,
future, intends, plans, believes, estimates, appears, projects and similar
expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results,
and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or
results will be achieved. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time
and/or managements good faith belief with respect to future events, and is subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those
expressed in the statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are
not limited to:
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
changes in, or the failure to comply with, the extensive government regulations
applicable to our industry segments; |
|
|
|
|
decreases in our refining margins or fuel gross profit as a result of increases in the
prices of crude oil, other feedstocks and refined petroleum products; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute our strategy of growth through acquisitions and transactional
risks in acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions, particularly levels of spending relating to
travel and tourism or conditions affecting the southeastern United States; |
|
|
|
|
dependence on one wholesaler for a significant portion of our convenience store
merchandise; |
|
|
|
|
unanticipated increases in cost or scope of, or significant delays in the completion of
our capital improvement projects; |
|
|
|
|
risks and uncertainties with respect to the quantities and costs of refined petroleum
products supplied to our pipelines and/or held in our terminals; |
|
|
|
|
operating hazards, natural disasters, casualty losses and other matters beyond our
control; |
|
|
|
|
increases in our debt levels; |
|
|
|
|
compliance, or failure to comply, with restrictive and financial covenants in our various
debt agreements; |
|
|
|
|
seasonality; |
|
|
|
|
terrorist attacks; |
|
|
|
|
volatility of derivative instruments; |
31
|
|
|
potential conflicts of interest between our major stockholder and other stockholders; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors discussed under the heading Managements Discussion and Analysis and in
our other filings with the SEC. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, our actual results of operations and
execution of our business strategy could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by,
the forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance upon them. In addition,
past financial and/or operating performance is not necessarily a reliable indicator of future
performance and you should not use our historical performance to anticipate results or future
period trends. We can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking
statements will occur or, if any of them do, what impact they will have on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. We assume no
obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions
or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information except to the extent required by
applicable securities laws. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference
should be drawn that we will make additional updates with respect thereto or with respect to other
forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a diversified energy business focused on petroleum refining, wholesale sales of refined
products and retail marketing. Our business consists of three operating segments: refining,
marketing and retail. Our refining segment owns a high conversion, moderate complexity independent
refinery in Tyler, Texas, with a design crude distillation capacity of 60,000 barrels per day (bpd)
and light products loading facilities. Our marketing segment sells refined products on a wholesale
basis in east and west Texas through company-owned and third-party operated terminals and crude oil
pipelines and owns and leases certain refined product and crude oil storage facilities. Our retail
segment markets gasoline, diesel, other refined petroleum products and convenience merchandise
through a network of 452 company-operated retail fuel and convenience stores located in Alabama,
Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Virginia. Of these 452
locations, the 9 stores located in Virginia are currently classified as held for sale for
accounting purposes. Additionally, we own a minority interest in Lion Oil Company (Lion Oil), a
privately-held Arkansas corporation, which operates a 75,000 bpd moderate complexity crude oil
refinery located in El Dorado, Arkansas and other pipeline and product terminals.
The cost to acquire feedstocks and the price of the refined petroleum products we ultimately
sell from our refinery depend on numerous factors beyond our control, including the supply of, and
demand for, crude oil, gasoline and other refined petroleum products which, in turn, depend on,
among other factors, changes in domestic and foreign economies, weather conditions, domestic and
foreign political affairs, global conflict, production levels, the availability of imports, the
marketing of competitive fuels and government regulation. Other significant factors that influence
our results in our refining segment include the cost of crude, our primary raw material, the
refinerys operating costs, particularly the cost of natural gas used for fuel and the cost of
electricity, seasonal factors, refinery utilization rates and planned or unplanned maintenance
activities or turnarounds.
The pricing of our refined petroleum products fluctuate significantly with movements in both
crude oil and refined petroleum product markets. Both the spread between crude oil and refined
petroleum product prices, and more recently the time lag between the fluctuations in those prices,
affect our earnings. We compare our per barrel refining operating margin to certain industry
benchmarks, specifically the U.S. Gulf Coast 5-3-2 crack spread. The U.S. Gulf Coast 5-3-2 crack
spread represents the differential between Platts quotations for 3/5 of a barrel of U.S. Gulf
Coast Pipeline 87 Octane Conventional Gasoline and 2/5 of a barrel of U.S. Gulf Coast Pipeline No.
2 Heating Oil (high sulfur diesel) and the first month futures price of 5/5 of a barrel of light
sweet crude oil on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
While the increases in the cost of crude oil are reflected in the changes of light refined
products over time, the value of heavier products, such as fuel oil, asphalt and coke, do not
always move in parallel with crude cost. These disparities in markets may cause additional pressure
on our refining margins.
As we have previously reported, on November 20, 2008, an explosion and fire occurred at our
refinery in Tyler, Texas which halted our production. The explosion and fire caused damage to both
our saturates gas plant and naphtha hydrotreater and resulted in an immediate suspension of our
refining operations. The refinery was subject to a gradual, monitored restart in early May 2009,
culminating in a full resumption of operations on May 18, 2009. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the refinery was fully operational for a total of 136 days.
32
We carry insurance coverage with $1.0 billion in combined limits to insure property damage and
business interruption, which is likely to cover the bulk of the reconstruction and business
interruption expenses that we incur during the transitional recovery period. Thus far, through
September 30, 2009, we have recorded insurance proceeds of $100.2 million, of which $64.1 million
is included as business interruption proceeds and $36.1 million is included as property damage
proceeds. We also recorded expenses of $11.4 million, resulting in a net gain of $24.7 million
related to property damage proceeds. The final total insurance claim has not yet been resolved for
a number of reasons, including, without limitation, the interpretation of insurance policy
provisions, the length of the insurance claim, insurance deductible amounts and periods, market
conditions that affect projected revenues and firm profits, actual operating and rebuild costs and
expenses, additional or revised information, audit adjustments and other verifications of the
insurance claim and subsequent events.
The cost to acquire the refined fuel products we sell to our wholesale customers in our
marketing segment and at our convenience stores in our retail segment depends on numerous factors
beyond our control, including the supply of, and demand for, crude oil, gasoline and other refined
petroleum products which, in turn, depends on, among other factors, changes in domestic and foreign
economies, weather conditions, domestic and foreign political affairs, production levels, the
availability of imports, the marketing of competitive fuels and government regulation. Our retail
merchandise sales are driven by convenience, customer service, competitive pricing and branding.
Motor fuel margin is sales less the delivered cost of fuel and motor fuel taxes, measured on a
cents per gallon basis. Our motor fuel margins are impacted by local supply, demand, weather,
competitor pricing and product brand.
As part of our overall business strategy, we regularly evaluate opportunities to expand and
complement our business and may at any time be discussing or negotiating a transaction that, if
consummated, could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or
results of operations.
Executive Summary of Recent Developments
Refining segment activity
The third quarter of 2009 was the first full quarter of operations for the Tyler refinery
since the suspension of operations due to the explosion and fire that occurred in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
For the third quarter of 2009, capacity utilization at the refinery was 82.6%, as compared to
86.0% in the same quarter 2008. We produced 54,092 barrels per day in the 2009 third quarter,
versus 55,339 barrels per day in the 2008 third quarter.
During the third quarter of 2009, we sought to optimize our production slate to take advantage
of a gasoline crack which, while weak, was still stronger than the distillate crack. As a result,
55.0% of our total production was gasoline, while 36.2% was distillate and 8.8% was residual
products.
Marketing segment activity
Our marketing segment generated net sales for the 2009 third quarter of $90.1 million on sales
of approximately 11,897 barrels per day of refined products compared to $224.9 million on sales of
approximately 16,900 barrels per day in the third quarter of 2008.
Inventories of refined products in central Texas rose to unusually
high levels during the period. Refined product volumes that are
typically shipped by competitors into upper Midwestern markets
remained in central Texas during the period, as summer demand in the
outside markets declined below historical levels. Given these
competitive dynamics, sales and profit margins within the marketing
segment were under pressure during the third quarter of 2009.
Retail segment activity
In the third quarter of 2009, the retail segment reported positive same-store gallons sold and
positive same-store merchandise sales when compared to the same quarter of 2008. We believe that a
combination of lower fuel prices and stabilization in unemployment rates in certain of our core
markets in Tennessee and Georgia have helped contribute to this improvement.
Market Trends
Our results of operations are significantly affected by the cost of commodities. Sudden change
in petroleum prices is our primary source of market risk. Our business model is affected more by
the volatility of petroleum prices than by the cost of the petroleum that we sell.
We continually experience volatility in the energy markets. Concerns about the U.S. economy
and continued uncertainty in several
33
oil-producing regions of the world resulted in volatility in the price of crude oil and
product prices in 2009 and 2008. The average price of crude oil in the third quarters of 2009 and
2008 was $68.24 and $118.70 per barrel, respectively. The U.S. Gulf Coast 5-3-2 crack spread ranged
from a high of $11.82 per barrel to a low of $1.89 per barrel and averaged $6.38 per barrel during
the third quarter of 2009, compared to an average of $15.08 in the third quarter of 2008.
We also continue to experience high volatility in the wholesale cost of fuel. The U.S. Gulf
Coast price for unleaded gasoline ranged from a low of $1.59 per gallon to a high of $2.03 per
gallon during the third quarter of 2009 and averaged $1.81 per gallon in the 2009 third quarter,
which compares to an average of $3.12 per gallon in the third quarter of 2008. If this volatility
continues and we are unable to fully pass our cost increases on to our customers, our retail fuel
margins will decline.
The cost of natural gas used for fuel in our Tyler refinery has also shown historic
volatility. Our average cost of natural gas decreased to $3.15 per million British Thermal Units
(MMBtu) in the third quarter of 2009 from $9.12 per million MMBtu in the third quarter of 2008.
As part of our overall business strategy, management determines, based on the market and other
factors, whether to maintain, increase or decrease inventory levels of crude or other intermediate
feedstocks. At the end of 2008, we reduced certain of our crude and feedstock inventories primarily
as a result of the refinery shutdown resulting from the fire in November 2008. In April 2009, in
preparation for the reinitiating of operations at the refinery, we resumed purchasing activities
and began building crude and intermediate inventories to appropriate, on-going operating levels.
Factors Affecting Comparability
The comparability of our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 is affected by the
following factors:
|
|
|
The explosion and fire at the Tyler, Texas refinery on November 20, 2008 which shut down
operations at the refinery for a portion of the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Operations fully resumed on May 18, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Volatile commodity prices in both 2009 and 2008, which have dramatically impacted sales
and costs of sales, and |
|
|
|
|
Change in the accounting for the investment in Lion Oil from the equity method to the
cost method. |
34
Summary Financial and Other Information
The following table provides summary financial data for Delek.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In millions, except share and per share data) |
|
Net sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
$ |
368.2 |
|
|
$ |
670.5 |
|
|
$ |
522.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,856.6 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
90.1 |
|
|
|
224.9 |
|
|
|
259.9 |
|
|
|
645.7 |
|
Retail |
|
|
365.2 |
|
|
|
506.9 |
|
|
|
990.5 |
|
|
|
1,454.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
817.9 |
|
|
|
1,402.5 |
|
|
|
1,766.1 |
|
|
|
3,957.1 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
745.1 |
|
|
|
1,271.2 |
|
|
|
1,562.9 |
|
|
|
3,654.7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
154.8 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
Insurance proceeds business interruption |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property damage proceeds, net |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
820.1 |
|
|
|
1,357.8 |
|
|
|
1,713.0 |
|
|
|
3,897.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Loss from equity method investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Other expenses (income), net |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expenses |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(4.8 |
) |
|
$ |
25.4 |
|
|
$ |
21.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
53,700,497 |
|
|
|
53,680,570 |
|
|
|
53,690,793 |
|
|
|
53,673,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
53,700,497 |
|
|
|
54,380,835 |
|
|
|
54,449,404 |
|
|
|
54,414,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share outstanding |
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
$ |
0.0375 |
|
|
$ |
0.1125 |
|
|
$ |
0.1125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
151.3 |
|
|
$ |
98.4 |
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105.1 |
) |
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
(85.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
366.1 |
|
|
$ |
365.2 |
|
|
$ |
86.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
817.9 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
347.5 |
|
|
|
315.1 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
745.1 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
55.6 |
|
Insurance proceeds business interruption |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Property damage proceeds, net |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
554.0 |
|
|
$ |
434.6 |
|
|
$ |
67.4 |
|
|
$ |
210.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,266.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail(1) |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
675.3 |
|
|
$ |
506.9 |
|
|
$ |
220.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,402.5 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
612.8 |
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
|
|
217.4 |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
1,271.2 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
29.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
457.1 |
|
|
$ |
505.2 |
|
|
$ |
85.3 |
|
|
$ |
195.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,242.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
528.2 |
|
|
$ |
990.5 |
|
|
$ |
246.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,766.1 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
465.6 |
|
|
|
858.6 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
1,562.9 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
154.8 |
|
Insurance proceeds business interruption |
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64.1 |
) |
Property damage proceeds, net |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
86.1 |
|
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
137.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
Loss on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
142.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
Retail(1) |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net sales (excluding intercompany marketing fees and sales) |
|
$ |
1,868.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,454.3 |
|
|
$ |
633.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,957.1 |
|
Intercompany marketing fees and sales |
|
|
(11.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
1,723.4 |
|
|
|
1,304.1 |
|
|
|
625.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
3,654.7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
75.5 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
179.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment contribution margin |
|
$ |
57.7 |
|
|
$ |
47.0 |
|
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
122.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital spending (excluding business combinations) |
|
$ |
73.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Retail operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 have
been restated to reflect the reclassification of the Virginia stores to discontinued
operations. |
Results of Operations
Consolidated Results of Operations Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
versus the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
For the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, we generated net sales of $817.9 million and $1,402.5
million, respectively, a decrease of $584.6 million or 41.7%. The decrease in net sales is
primarily due to decreased fuel sales prices at the refining, retail and marketing segments.
Cost of goods sold was $745.1 million for the 2009 third quarter compared to $1,271.2 million
for the 2008 third quarter, a decrease of $526.1 million or 41.4%. The decrease in cost of goods
sold primarily resulted from lower cost of crude at the refinery and decreased fuel costs at the
retail and marketing segments. Cost of goods sold for the third quarter of 2009 and 2008 also
include net gains (losses) on derivative activity of $(0.5) million and $13.5 million,
respectively.
Operating expenses were $55.6 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to $64.0 million
for the 2008 third quarter, a decrease of $8.4 million or 13.1%. This decrease was primarily due to
lower utility costs at the refinery and decreases in credit expense and salaries at the retail
segment.
During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded insurance proceeds of $12.0 million related to
the fourth quarter 2008 incident at the refinery, of which $6.0 million is included as business
interruption proceeds and $6.0 million is included as property damage proceeds. We also recorded
expenses of $0.2 million, resulting in a net gain of $5.8 million related to property damage
proceeds.
General and administrative expenses were $15.4 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared
to $16.3 million for the 2008 third quarter, a decrease of $0.9 million or 5.5%. The overall
decrease was primarily due to decreases in salaried labor and benefits expenses. We do not allocate
general and administrative expenses to our operating segments.
Depreciation and amortization was $13.9 million for the 2009 third quarter compared to $10.3
million for the 2008 third quarter, an increase of $3.6 million or 35.0%. This increase was
primarily due to several capital projects that were placed in service at the refinery, including
the saturates gas plant rebuild due to the fourth quarter 2008 explosion and fire, the turnaround
activities completed in the second quarter of 2009 and crude optimization projects completed in the
second quarter of 2009.
Interest expense was $6.8 million and $6.5 million in the 2009 and 2008 third quarters,
respectively. This increase is the net result of a number of partially offsetting factors. An
increase in our letter of credit rates was partially offset by a reduction in the amount of letters
of credit issued and an increase in our funded debt levels was partially offset by a decrease in
our average interest rate for our variable rate debt. Additionally, capitalized interest in the
third quarter of 2009 was lower than in the third quarter 2008, contributing to an increase in
interest expense. Interest income was nominal in the 2009 third quarter and $0.4 million for the
2008 third quarter. This decrease was primarily due to lower cash balances and lower investment
returns.
37
Beginning October 1, 2008, Delek began reporting its investment in Lion Oil using the cost
method of accounting. Accordingly, there was no income from equity method investment in the third
quarter of 2009. In the third quarter of 2008, the loss from equity method investment was $0.8
million, which included our proportionate share of the loss from our investment for this period of
$0.7 million, as well as amortization expense of $0.1 million related to the fair value
differential determined at the acquisition date of our minority investment. We included our
proportionate share of the operating results of Lion Oil in our consolidated statements of
operations two months in arrears.
Other expenses (income), net were $(1.4) million and $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2009
and 2008, respectively. In the third quarter of 2009, we sold our available for sale investment in
shares of common stock in Bank of America. This sale resulted in a gain of $1.4 million in the
third quarter of 2009. Other expenses in the third quarter of 2008 primarily relate to the change
in fair market value of our interest rate derivatives.
Income tax (benefit) expense was $(2.5) million for the third quarter of 2009, compared to
$13.3 million for the 2008 third quarter. Our effective tax rate was 32.9% for the third quarter of
2009, compared to 35.3% for the third quarter of 2008.
Consolidated Results of Operations Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 versus
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we generated net sales of $1,766.1
million and $3,957.1 million, respectively, a decrease of $2,191.0 million or 55.4%. The decrease
in net sales is primarily due to the suspension of our operations at the refinery as a result of
the explosion and fire on November 20, 2008 and decreased fuel sales prices at the refining, retail
and marketing segments. The refinery resumed operations in May 2009.
Cost of goods sold was $1,562.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to $3,654.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $2,091.8 million or
57.2%. The decrease in cost of goods sold resulted from the suspension of our operations at the
refinery, decreased cost of crude at the refinery and decreased fuel costs at the retail and
marketing segments. The refinery resumed operations in May 2009. Cost of goods sold for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 also include net gains (losses) on derivative activity of
$7.2 million and $(6.7) million, respectively.
Operating expenses were $154.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to $179.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $25.0 million or
13.9%. This decrease was primarily due to the suspension of our operations at the refinery and
decreases in credit expense and salaries at the retail segment.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded insurance proceeds of $100.2
million, of which $64.1 million is included as business interruption proceeds and $36.1 million is
included as property damage proceeds. We also recorded expenses of $11.4 million, resulting in a
net gain of $24.7 million related to property damage proceeds.
General and administrative expenses were $45.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to $41.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $3.7
million or 8.8%. The overall increase was primarily due to increases in property taxes, salaried
labor and benefits expenses. We do not allocate general and administrative expenses to the
segments.
Depreciation and amortization was $36.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
compared to $28.1 million for the comparable period in 2008. This increase was primarily due to
several capital projects that were placed in service at the refinery in the second quarter of 2009,
including the saturates gas plant rebuild due to the fourth quarter 2008 explosion and fire, the
turnaround and crude optimization projects completed in the second quarter of 2009.
Interest expense was $17.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$18.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $1.0 million. This
decrease is the net result of a number of offsetting factors. A large reduction in the amount of
letters of credit issued due to the suspension of operations at the refinery during the first part
of the year was partially offset by an increase in our letter of credit fees and a decrease in our
average interest rate for our variable rate debt was partially offset by an increase in our funded
debt levels. Additionally, capitalized interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
lower than in the same period 2008, lessening the interest expense decrease. Interest income was
$0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $2.0 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $1.9 million. This decrease was due to lower cash
balances and lower investment returns during the first nine months of 2009.
Beginning October 1, 2008, Delek began reporting its investment in Lion Oil using the cost
method of accounting. Accordingly, there was no income from equity method investment in the
comparable period of 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our loss from equity
investment was $7.9 million, which included our proportionate share of the income for this period
of $7.1 million and $0.8 million of amortization expense related to the fair value differential
determined at the acquisition date of our equity
38
investment. We included our proportionate share of the operating results of Lion Oil in our
consolidated statements of operations two months in arrears.
Other expenses, net were $0.6 million and $0.8 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. In the second quarter of 2009, we exchanged our auction rate
securities investment for shares of common stock in Bank of America to be held as available for
sale securities. This conversion resulted in a loss of $2.0 million. In the third quarter of 2009,
we sold the common stock of Bank of America. This sale resulted in a gain of $1.4 million, which
partially offset the loss recognized on conversion. Other expenses during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily related to the change in fair market value of our interest rate
derivatives.
Income tax expense (benefit) was $12.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to $12.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $0.5
million. Our effective tax rate was 35.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to
35.0% for the comparable period in 2008.
Operating Segments
We review operating results in three reportable segments: refining, marketing and retail.
Refining Segment
The table below sets forth certain information concerning our refining segment operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Days operated in period |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Total sales volume (average barrels per day)(1) |
|
|
54,266 |
|
|
|
55,854 |
|
|
|
55,758 |
|
|
|
55,034 |
|
Products manufactured (average barrels per day)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline |
|
|
29,735 |
|
|
|
30,158 |
|
|
|
28,653 |
|
|
|
29,718 |
|
Diesel/Jet |
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
20,611 |
|
|
|
20,168 |
|
|
|
20,553 |
|
Petrochemicals, LPG, NGLs |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total production |
|
|
54,092 |
|
|
|
55,339 |
|
|
|
53,773 |
|
|
|
54,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput (average barrels per day)(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil |
|
|
49,530 |
|
|
|
51,616 |
|
|
|
51,555 |
|
|
|
51,381 |
|
Other feedstocks |
|
|
6,388 |
|
|
|
4,946 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
4,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total throughput |
|
|
55,918 |
|
|
|
56,562 |
|
|
|
55,877 |
|
|
|
56,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per barrel of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating margin |
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
$ |
11.23 |
|
|
$ |
7.87 |
|
|
$ |
8.83 |
|
Refining operating margin excluding intercompany marketing
service fees |
|
$ |
4.37 |
|
|
$ |
12.16 |
|
|
$ |
9.03 |
|
|
$ |
9.61 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.82 |
|
|
$ |
5.46 |
|
|
$ |
7.69 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
Pricing statistics (average for the period presented)(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTI Cushing crude oil (per barrel) |
|
$ |
68.24 |
|
|
$ |
118.70 |
|
|
$ |
68.00 |
|
|
$ |
113.59 |
|
US Gulf Coast 5-3-2 crack spread (per barrel)(3) |
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
|
$ |
15.08 |
|
|
$ |
6.93 |
|
|
$ |
11.63 |
|
US Gulf Coast Unleaded Gasoline (per gallon) |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
Ultra low sulfur diesel (per gallon) |
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
3.28 |
|
Natural gas (per MMBTU) |
|
$ |
3.15 |
|
|
$ |
9.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.35 |
|
|
$ |
9.68 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Results include nominal throughputs and production for the period of gradual restart
of the refinery from May 1, 2009 through May 17, 2009. The refinery resumed full operations on
May 18, 2009. Sales volumes also include minimal sales of intermediate products made prior to
the restart of the refinery. |
|
(2) |
|
This information for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is calculated for the
136 days that the refinery was fully operational. |
|
(3) |
|
The average US Gulf Coast 5-3-2 crack spread was $7.76 for the full nine months
ended September 30, 2009. |
39
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 versus the Three Months Ended September 30,
2008
Net sales for the refining segment were $368.2 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared
to $670.5 million for the 2008 third quarter, a decrease of $302.3 million or 45.1%. This decrease
is primarily due to a decrease in the sales price of finished products. The average sales price
per barrel sold decreased $56.73 per barrel, to $73.75 per barrel during the third quarter of 2009
from $130.48 per barrel during third quarter of 2008.
Cost of goods sold for the third quarter of 2009 was $347.5 million compared to $612.8 million
for the 2008 third quarter, a decrease of $265.3 million or 43.3%. This decrease is primarily due
to a decrease in the average cost of crude oil from $118.70 per barrel in the third quarter of 2008
to $68.22 per barrel in the third quarter of 2009. Cost of goods sold for the third quarter of
2009 and 2008 include gains (losses) of a nominal amount and $2.5 million, respectively, related to
derivative contract activity.
Our refining segment has a service agreement with our marketing segment, which among other
things, requires the refining segment to pay service fees based on the number of gallons sold at
the Tyler refinery and to share with the marketing segment a portion of the marketing margin
achieved in return for providing marketing, sales and customer services. This fee was $1.2 million
during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to $4.8 million in the same period of 2008. We
eliminate this intercompany fee in consolidation.
During the third quarter of 2009, we recorded insurance proceeds of $12.0 million related to
the fourth quarter 2008 incident at the refinery, of which $6.0 million is included as business
interruption proceeds and $6.0 million is included as property damage proceeds. We also recorded
expenses of $0.2 million, resulting in a net gain of $5.8 million related to property damage
proceeds.
Operating expenses were $24.1 million for the 2009 third quarter compared to $28.1 million for
the 2008 third quarter. This decrease in operating expense was primarily due to decreases in
utilities, including a decrease in the cost of natural gas of $5.97
per MMBtu from $9.12 in the
third quarter of 2008 to $3.15 in the third quarter of 2009. This decrease was partially offset by
a $1.8 million increase in transportation and pipeline expenses, which are paid to the marketing
segment. We eliminate these fees in consolidation.
Contribution margin for the refining segment in the 2009 third quarter was $8.4 million, or
29.0% of our consolidated contribution margin.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 versus the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
Net sales for the refining segment were $522.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to $1,856.6 million for the same period in 2008, a decrease of $1,333.7 million or
71.8%. This decrease is primarily due to the November 20, 2008 explosion and fire that led to the
suspension of operations at the refinery and a decrease in selling prices on finished products. The
average sales price per barrel sold decreased $54.16 per barrel, to $68.96 per barrel during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $123.12 per barrel during the nine months ended September
30, 2008. The refinery resumed operations in May 2009.
Cost of goods sold for our refining segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$465.6 million compared to $1,723.4 million for the comparable period of 2008, a decrease of
$1,257.8 million or 73.0%. This decrease is due to the November 20, 2008 explosion and fire that
led to the suspension of operations at the refinery and a decrease in the average cost of crude
oil, from $113.59 per barrel during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $68.00 per barrel
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The refinery resumed operations in May 2009. Cost
of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 include gains (losses) of $8.2
million and $(5.2) million, respectively, related to derivative contract activity.
Our refining segment has a services agreement with our marketing segment, which among other
things, requires the refining segment to pay service fees to the marketing segment based on the
number of gallons sold at the Tyler refinery and a sharing of a portion of the marketing margin
achieved in return for providing marketing, sales and customer services. This fee was $8.6 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $11.8 million in the same period of
2008. We eliminate this intercompany fee in consolidation.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded insurance proceeds of $100.2
million related to the fourth quarter 2008 incident at the refinery, of which, $64.1 million is
included as business interruption proceeds and $36.1 million is included as property damage. We
also recorded expenses of $11.4 million, resulting in a net gain of $24.7 million related to
property damage proceeds.
Operating expenses were $60.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$75.5 million for the nine
40
months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease in operating expense was primarily due to
decreases in utilities and chemicals due to the suspension of operations and a decrease in the cost
of natural gas of $6.33 per MMBTU from $9.68 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $3.35
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease was partially offset by a $2.5 million
increase in transportation and pipeline expenses, which are paid to the marketing segment. We
eliminate these fees in consolidation.
Segment contribution margin for the refining segment for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 represented 62.8% of our consolidated segment contribution margin, or $86.1 million.
Marketing Segment
The table below sets forth certain information concerning our marketing segment operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Days operated in period |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Total sales volume (average barrels per day) |
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
16,946 |
|
|
|
13,151 |
|
|
|
17,316 |
|
Products sold (average barrels per day): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasoline |
|
|
6,423 |
|
|
|
8,349 |
|
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
8,440 |
|
Diesel/Jet |
|
|
5,434 |
|
|
|
8,531 |
|
|
|
6,251 |
|
|
|
8,810 |
|
Other |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
|
|
11,897 |
|
|
|
16,946 |
|
|
|
13,151 |
|
|
|
17,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses (per barrel of sales) |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 versus the Three Months Ended September 30,
2008
Net sales for the marketing segment were $90.1 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared
to $224.9 million for the 2008 third quarter. Total sales volume averaged 11,897 barrels per day in
the 2009 third quarter compared to 16,946 in the 2008 third quarter. The average sales price per
gallon of gasoline decreased to $1.89 per gallon in the third quarter of 2009 from $3.21 in the
third quarter of 2008. The average price of diesel also decreased to $1.87 per gallon in the third
quarter of 2009 compared to $3.52 per gallon in the third quarter of 2008. Constraints in the
midcontinent market related to lower demand put pricing pressure on our west Texas market.
Additionally, diminished oil drilling activity in the west Texas area reduced demand for diesel.
Net sales included $1.2 million and $4.8 million of net service fees for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $2.4 million in transportation and storage fees for
the three months ended September 30, 2009. These fees were paid by our refining segment to our
marketing segment and are eliminated in consolidation. The service fees were based on the number
of gallons sold and a shared portion of the margin achieved in return for providing sales and
customer support services.
Cost of goods sold was $85.7 million in the third quarter of 2009 approximating a cost per
barrel sold of $78.28. This compares to cost of goods sold of $217.4 million for the third quarter
of 2008, approximating a cost per barrel sold of $139.46. This cost per barrel resulted in an
average gross margin of $4.02 per barrel in the 2009 third quarter compared to $4.77 per barrel in
the 2008 third quarter. Additionally, we recognized (losses) gains during the third quarters of
2009 and 2008 of $(0.5) million and $2.1 million, respectively, associated with settlement of
nomination differences under long-term purchase contracts.
Operating expenses in the marketing segment were approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million
for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, and primarily relate to utilities and
insurance costs.
Contribution margin for the marketing segment in the 2009 third quarter was $3.9 million, or
13.4% of our consolidated segment contribution margin.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 versus the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
Net sales for the marketing segment were $259.9 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to $645.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Total sales volume
averaged 13,151 barrels per day during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 17,316
in the 2008 comparable period. The average sales price per gallon of gasoline decreased to $1.65
per gallon in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $2.97 for the same period in 2008. The
average price of diesel also decreased to $1.63 per gallon in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to $3.39 per gallon in the comparable period of 2008. Constraints in the midcontinent
market related to lower demand put pricing pressure on our west Texas
41
market throughout the period. Additionally, in the second quarter, diminished oil drilling
activity in the west Texas area reduced demand for diesel. Net sales included $8.6 million and
$11.8 million of net service fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $4.4 million in transportation and storage fees for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. These fees were paid by our refining segment to our marketing segment and are
eliminated in consolidation. In the first half of 2009, during the period of suspension of
operations at the refinery, the service fees were partially based on the modeled sales included in
the refining segments business interruption insurance claims. In the remainder of the second
quarter and in the third quarter 2009 when the refinery was in operation and in the 2008 second
quarter, the service fees were based on the number of gallons sold and a shared portion of the
margin achieved in return for providing sales and customer support services.
Cost of goods sold was $242.4 million in the nine months of 2009 approximating a cost per
barrel sold of $67.52. This compares to cost of goods sold of $625.3 million for the same period in
2008, approximating a cost per barrel sold of $131.80. This cost per barrel resulted in an average
gross margin of $4.88 per barrel for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $4.30 per
barrel for the same period in 2008. Additionally, we recognized losses during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 of $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively, associated with
settlement of nomination differences under long-term purchase contracts.
Operating expenses in the marketing segment were approximately $0.9 million and $0.8 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and primarily relate to utilities and
insurance costs.
Contribution margin for the marketing segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$16.6 million, or 12.1% of our consolidated segment contribution margin.
Retail Segment
The table below sets forth certain information concerning our retail segment continuing
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008(1) |
|
2009 |
|
2008(1) |
Number of stores (end of period) |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
Average number of stores |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
Retail fuel sales (thousands of gallons) |
|
|
102,391 |
|
|
|
100,875 |
|
|
|
305,968 |
|
|
|
308,371 |
|
Average retail gallons per average number of stores (in thousands) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
Retail fuel margin ($ per gallon) |
|
$ |
0.178 |
|
|
$ |
0.241 |
|
|
$ |
0.137 |
|
|
$ |
0.180 |
|
Merchandise sales (in thousands) |
|
$ |
99,547 |
|
|
$ |
98,033 |
|
|
$ |
284,185 |
|
|
$ |
288,393 |
|
Merchandise margin % |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Credit expense (% of gross margin) |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
Merchandise and cash over/short (% of net sales) |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Operating expense/merchandise sales plus total gallons |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Retail operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 have been
restated to reflect the reclassification of the Virginia stores to discontinued operations. |
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 versus the Three Months Ended September 30,
2008
Net sales for our retail segment in the third quarter of 2009 decreased 28.0% to $365.2
million from $506.9 million in the 2008 third quarter. This decrease was primarily due to a
decrease in the retail fuel price per gallon of 35.8% to an average price of $2.42 per gallon in
the third quarter of 2009 from an average price of $3.77 per gallon in the third quarter of 2008.
Retail fuel sales were 102.4 million gallons for the 2009 third quarter, compared to 100.9
million gallons for the 2008 third quarter. Comparable store gallons increased 2.2% between the
third quarter of 2009 and the third quarter of 2008. Total fuel sales, including wholesale dollars,
decreased 35.1% to $265.6 million in the third quarter of 2009 from $409 million in the third
quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $1.35 per gallon in the average
retail price per gallon ($2.42 per gallon in the third quarter of 2009 compared to $3.77 per gallon
in the third quarter of 2008), partially offset by a increase in gallons sold noted above.
Merchandise sales increased 1.5% to $99.5 million in the third quarter of 2009. On April 1,
2009, a federal tax increase of 62 cents per cigarette pack went into effect and increased our
merchandise sales dollars. Without the cigarette tax increase, merchandise sales
42
would have declined for the quarter due to lower sales in the beer category, the snacks
category, and the dairy category, which includes water, juice, energy drinks and dairy items. Our
comparable store merchandise sales increased by 1.9% for primarily the same reason.
Cost of goods sold for our retail segment decreased 30% from $450.0 million in the third
quarter of 2008 to $315.1 million in the third quarter of 2009. This decrease was primarily due to
the decrease in the average cost per gallon of 36.5%, or an average cost of $2.24 per gallon in the
third quarter of 2009 when compared to an average cost of $3.53 per gallon in the third quarter of
2008.
Operating expenses were $33.4 million in the 2009 third quarter compared to $35.4 million in
the 2008 third quarter, a decrease of $2.0 million, or 5.6%. This decrease was due primarily to a
decrease in credit expenses. The ratio of operating expenses to merchandise sales plus total
gallons sold in our retail operations decreased to 15.9% in the third quarter of 2009 from 17.2% in
the third quarter of 2008.
Contribution margin for the retail segment in the 2009 third quarter was $16.7 million, or
57.6% of our consolidated contribution margin.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 versus the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
Net sales for our retail segment in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 31.9%
to $990.5 million from $1,454.3 million in the comparable 2008 period. This decrease was primarily
due to a decrease in the retail fuel price per gallon of 38.7% to an average price of $2.15 per gallon
in the first nine months of 2009 from an average price of $3.51 per gallon in the first nine months
of 2008.
Retail fuel sales were 306.0 million gallons for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to 308.4 million gallons for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Total fuel sales,
including wholesale dollars, decreased 39.4% to $706.2 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease of $1.36 per gallon in the average retail
price per gallon ($2.15 per gallon in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $3.51
per gallon in the nine months ended September 30, 2008).
Merchandise sales decreased 1.5% to $284.2 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009. This decrease was primarily due to decreases in the dairy, beer, general merchandise, and
snacks categories. These decreases were partially offset by higher cigarette sales, which can be
attributed to the April 1, 2009 federal tax increase on cigarettes. Our comparable store
merchandise sales decreased by 1.1% for primarily the same reasons.
Cost of goods sold for our retail segment decreased 34.2% from $1,304.1 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to $858.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This
decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average cost of fuel of $1.32 per gallon, to $2.01
per gallon in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $3.33 per gallon in the 2008
comparable period.
Operating expenses were $98.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to
$103.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $4.9 million, or 4.7%.
This decrease was due primarily to lower credit card expenses. The ratio of operating expenses to
merchandise sales plus total gallons sold in our retail operations decreased to 16% in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 from 16.6% in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Segment contribution margin for the retail segment for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 represented 24.5% of our total contribution margin or $33.6 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from our operating activities, borrowings
under our revolving credit facilities and, due to the refinery incident in the fourth quarter of
2008, business interruption and property damage insurance proceeds covering the period of downtime
experienced by the refinery and necessary capital expenditures to repair and replace assets damaged
in the incident. We believe that our cash flows from operations, borrowings under our current
credit facilities and insurance proceeds will be sufficient to satisfy the anticipated cash
requirements associated with our existing operations for at least the next 12 months.
Additional capital may be required in order to consummate significant acquisitions. We would
likely seek these additional funds
43
from a variety of sources, including public or private debt and stock offerings, and
borrowings under credit lines or other sources, including our parent company. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to raise additional funds on favorable terms or at all.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated cash flows for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flow Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
151.3 |
|
|
$ |
98.4 |
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(105.1 |
) |
|
|
(38.2 |
) |
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
(85.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
92.4 |
|
|
$ |
(25.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $151.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $98.4 million for the same period in 2008. The increase in cash
flows from operations in 2009 from 2008 was primarily due to a $30.1 million increase in deferred
taxes and an increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities. These changes were
partially offset by an increase in inventories and other current assets.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $105.1 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 compared to $38.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This increase is
primarily due to a $62.7 million increase in capital spending in the first nine months of 2009 as
compared to the first nine months of 2008 and the cash provided by purchase and sales activity of
$44.4 million associated with our short-term investments in the first nine months of 2008. We had
no short-term investment activity in the first nine months of 2009.
Cash used in investing activities includes our capital expenditures during the current period
of approximately $153.6 million, of which $142.9 million was spent on projects at our refinery,
including the rebuild of the saturates gas plant damaged in the explosion and fire in the fourth
quarter of 2008, and $10.7 million in our retail segment. During the nine months ended September
30, 2008, we spent $73.8 million on projects at our refinery, $16.2 million in our retail segment
and $0.9 million in our marketing segment.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $46.2 million during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to ($85.8) million in the first nine months of 2008. The
increase in net cash provided by financing activities in the first nine months of 2009 primarily
consisted of net proceeds from long-term revolvers of $54.3 million and proceeds from a new related
party note payable of $65.0 million, compared to net revolver payments of $21.3 million and note
proceeds of $20.0 million in the first nine months of 2008. The increase was partially offset by
payments on debt and capital lease obligations of $63.8 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2009, as compared to payments of $35.6 million in the same period of 2008.
Cash Position and Indebtedness
As of September 30, 2009, our total cash and cash equivalents were $107.7 million and we had
total indebtedness of approximately $341.5 million. Borrowing availability under our four separate
revolving credit facilities was approximately $109.7 million and we had letters of credit issued of
$150.8 million. We believe we were in compliance with our covenants in all debt facilities as of
September 30, 2009.
44
Capital Spending
A key component of our long-term strategy is our capital expenditure program. Our capital
expenditures through the 2009 third quarter were $153.6 million, of which approximately $142.9
million was spent in our refining segment and approximately $10.7 million was spent in our retail
segment. Our capital expenditure budget is approximately $175.3 million for 2009. The following
table summarizes our actual capital expenditures through the third quarter of 2009 and planned
capital expenditures for the full year 2009 by operating segment and major category (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Full Year |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 Budget |
|
|
2009 Actual |
|
Refining: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustaining maintenance |
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Turnaround |
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
Regulatory |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Saturates Gas Plant rebuild |
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
Discretionary projects |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining segment total |
|
|
155.8 |
|
|
|
142.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discretionary projects |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing segment total |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sustaining maintenance |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Store enhancements |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Re-image/builds |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail segment total |
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital spending |
|
$ |
175.3 |
|
|
$ |
153.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009, we plan to spend approximately $18.0 million in the retail segment, $14.0 million of
which is expected to consist of one raze and rebuild and the re-imaging of 35 to 40 of our
existing stores. Through the third quarter of 2009, we spent $6.6 million on these projects. We
expect to spend approximately $15.9 million on regulatory projects in the refining segment in 2009.
We spent $10.8 million on such projects through the third quarter of 2009. We expect the spending
on crude optimization projects in 2009 to be approximately $30.6 million and approximately $10.1
million for other maintenance and discretionary projects. In the first nine months of 2009, we
spent approximately $45.7 million related to scheduled turnaround activities and approximately
$49.0 million to rebuild the saturates gas plant due to the refinery fire and explosion.
Our total planned capital expenditures for the refining segment has increased by approximately
$3.0 million from our previous estimates. This increase is primarily attributable to increases in
the scope of work being performed in regulatory projects.
The amount of our capital expenditure budget is subject to change due to unanticipated
increases in the cost, scope and completion time for our capital projects. For example, we may
experience increases in the cost of and/or timing to obtain necessary equipment required for our
continued compliance with government regulations or to complete improvement projects to the
refinery. Additionally, the scope and cost of employee or contractor labor expense related with
installation of that equipment could increase from our projections.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2009.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Changes in commodity prices (mainly petroleum crude oil and unleaded gasoline) and interest
rates are our primary sources of market risk. When we manage our market exposure, our objective is
generally to avoid losses from negative price changes, realizing we will not obtain the benefit of
positive price changes.
45
Commodity Price Risk
Impact of Changing Prices. Our revenues and cash flows, as well as estimates of future cash
flows, are sensitive to changes in energy prices. Major shifts in the cost of crude oil, the prices
of refined products and the cost of ethanol can generate large changes in the operating margin in
each of our segments. Gains and losses on transactions accounted for using mark-to-market
accounting are reflected in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations at each
period end. Gains or losses on commodity derivative contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges are
recognized in other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheets and ultimately, when
the forecasted transactions are completed in net sales or cost of goods sold in the consolidated
statements of operations.
Price Risk Management Activities. At times, we enter into commodity derivative contracts to
manage our price exposure to our inventory positions, future purchases of crude oil and ethanol,
future sales of refined products or to fix margins on future production. During 2007, in connection
with our marketing segments supply contracts, we entered into certain futures contracts. In
accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815), all of these commodity futures
contracts are recorded at fair value, and any change in fair value between periods has historically
been recorded in the profit and loss section of our consolidated financial statements. At September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had open derivative contracts representing 231,000 barrels and
148,000 barrels, respectively, of refined petroleum products with an unrealized net loss of $0.1
million and $0.8 million, respectively.
In December 2007, in connection with our offering of renewable fuels in our retail segment
markets, we entered into a series of OTC swaps based on the futures price of ethanol as quoted on
the Chicago Board of Trade and a series of OTC swaps based on the futures price of unleaded
gasoline as quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange. In accordance with ASC 815, all of these
swaps are recorded at fair value, and any change in fair value between periods has historically
been recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008, we had open derivative contracts representing 383,905 barrels and 1,214,548 barrels of
ethanol, respectively, with unrealized net losses of $2.1 million and $6.8 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we also had open derivative contracts representing
384,000 barrels and 1,200,000 barrels, respectively, of unleaded gasoline with unrealized net gains
of $3.2 million and $11.1 million, respectively.
In March 2008, we entered into a series of OTC swaps based on the future price of West Texas
Intermediate Crude (WTI) as quoted on the NYMEX which fixed the purchase price of WTI for a
predetermined number of barrels at future dates from July 2008 through December 2009. We also
entered into a series of OTC swaps based on the future price of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) as
quoted on the Gulf Coast ULSD PLATTS which fixed the sales price of ULSD for a predetermined number
of gallons at future dates from July 2008 through December 2009.
In accordance with ASC 815, the WTI and ULSD swaps were designated as cash flow hedges with
the change in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income. However, as of November 20, 2008,
due to the suspension of operations at the refinery, the cash flow designation was removed because
the probability of occurrence of the hedged forecasted transactions for the period of the shutdown
became remote. All changes in the fair value of these swaps subsequent to November 20, 2008 have
been recognized in the statement of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, we recognized (losses) gains of $(0.2) million and $10.2 million, respectively, which are
included as an adjustment to cost of goods sold in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations as a result of the discontinuation of these cash flow hedges. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, Delek recorded unrealized gains (losses) as a component of other
comprehensive income of $14.2 million ($8.8 million, net of deferred taxes) and $(8.1) million
($(5.4) million, net of deferred taxes), respectively, related to the change in the fair value of
these swaps. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Delek had total unrealized losses, net
of deferred income taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income of $0.2 million and $0.6
million associated with these hedges. The fair value of these contracts remaining in accumulated
other comprehensive income will be recognized in income as the positions are closed and the hedged
transactions are recognized in income.
We maintain at our refinery and in third-party facilities inventories of crude oil, feedstocks
and refined petroleum products, the values of which are subject to wide fluctuations in market
prices driven by world economic conditions, regional and global inventory levels and seasonal
conditions. At September 30, 2009, we held approximately 1.2 million barrels of crude and product
inventories valued under the LIFO valuation method with an average cost of $58.03 per barrel. At
December 31, 2008, market values had fallen below most of our LIFO inventory layer values and, as a
result, we recognized a pre-tax loss of approximately $10.9 million relating to the reflection of
market value at a level below cost. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized
gains of $9.0 million relating to the recovery of these losses, not to exceed LIFO cost, due to the
recovery of market values. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a
reversal of loss recovery of $1.0 million due to a reduction in market price increases since June
30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the excess of replacement cost (FIFO) over the carrying value
(LIFO) of refinery inventories was $10.7 million. The excess of replacement cost (FIFO) over the
carrying value (LIFO) of refinery inventories at December 31,
46
2008 was nominal. We refer to this excess as our LIFO reserve.
Interest Rate Risk
We have market exposure to changes in interest rates relating to our outstanding variable rate
borrowings, which totaled $276.6 million as of September 30, 2009. We help manage this risk through
interest rate swap and cap agreements that modify the interest characteristics of our outstanding
long-term debt. In accordance with ASC 815, all interest rate hedging instruments are recorded at
fair value and any changes in the fair value between periods are recognized in earnings. The fair
value of our interest rate hedging instruments decreased by a nominal amount and $0.1 million,
respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The fair values of our
interest rate swaps and cap agreements are obtained from dealer quotes. These values represent the
estimated amount that we would receive or pay to terminate the agreements taking into account the
difference between the contract rate of interest and rates currently quoted for agreements, of
similar terms and maturities. We expect that interest rate derivatives will reduce our exposure to
short-term interest rate movements. The annualized impact of a hypothetical one percent change in
interest rates on floating rate debt outstanding as of September 30, 2009 would be to change
interest expense by $2.8 million. Increases in rates would be partially mitigated by interest rate
derivatives mentioned above. As of September 30, 2009, we had interest rate cap agreements in place
representing $60.0 million in notional value with settlement dates in July 2010. These interest
rate caps range from 3.75% to 4.00% as measured by the 3-month LIBOR rate and include a knock-out
feature at rates ranging from 6.65% to 7.15% using the same measurement rate. The fair value of our
interest rate derivatives was nominal as of both September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The types of instruments used in our hedging and trading activities described above include
swaps and futures. Our positions in derivative commodity instruments are monitored and managed on a
daily basis by a risk management committee to ensure compliance with our risk management strategies
which have been approved by our board of directors.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive and principal
financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period
covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective
to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that
we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and
forms.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as described in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during our last fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary conduct of our business, we are from time to time subject to lawsuits,
investigations and claims, including environmental claims and employee related matters. Between
February and August of 2008, OSHA conducted an inspection at our Tyler, Texas refinery and issued
citations assessing an aggregate penalty of less than $0.1 million. Between November 2008 and May
2009, OSHA conducted another inspection at our Tyler, Texas refinery as a result of the explosion
and fire that occurred on November 20, 2008, and issued citations assessing an aggregate penalty of
approximately $0.2 million. We are contesting these citations. Although we cannot predict with
certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us,
including civil penalties or other enforcement actions, we do not believe that any currently
pending legal proceeding or proceedings to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
47
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Deleks Annual
Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2009.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by Affiliated Purchasers (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Shares That May Yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Programs |
|
the Plans or |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
Paid Per Share |
|
(2) |
|
Programs |
7/1/2009 7/31/2009 |
|
None |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
8/1/2009 8/31/2009 |
|
|
101,481 |
|
|
$ |
7.94 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
9/1/2009 9/30/2009 |
|
|
52,711 |
|
|
$ |
8.06 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
Total |
|
|
154,192 |
|
|
$ |
7.98 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The table reflects open market purchases of our common stock by Delek Petroleum
Ltd., a subsidiary of our controlling stockholder, Delek Group, Ltd., and is based upon Delek
Petroleums filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under Exchange Act Rule
10b-18, Delek Petroleum may be deemed to be an affiliated purchaser because it is under
common control with us. We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the
periods reflected in the table. |
|
(2) |
|
No purchases reflected in the table were made pursuant to a publicly announced plan
or program. |
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
On November 4, 2009, our Board of Directors approved non-substantive amendments to our Code of
Business Conduct & Ethics (the Code). The Code is available on our website at www.DelekUS.com.
48
Item 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated August 25, 2009 by and between
Delek US Holdings, Inc. and Mark B. Cox. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 2009 by and between
Delek US Holdings, Inc. and Ezra Uzi Yemin. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Resignation, Waiver, Consent and Appointment Agreement dated
September 1, 2009 by and between Fifth Third Bank, N.A.,
Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. and MAPCO Express, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Term Promissory Note dated September 29, 2009 in the principal
amount of $65,000,000 between Delek US Holdings, Inc. and
Delek Petroleum, Ltd. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delek US Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ezra Uzi Yemin
|
|
|
|
Ezra Uzi Yemin |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Mark Cox
|
|
|
|
Mark Cox |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
Dated: November 6, 2009
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
10.1*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated August 25, 2009 by and between
Delek US Holdings, Inc. and Mark B. Cox. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of May 1, 2009 by and between
Delek US Holdings, Inc. and Ezra Uzi Yemin. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Resignation, Waiver, Consent and Appointment Agreement dated
September 1, 2009 by and between Fifth Third Bank, N.A.,
Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. and MAPCO Express, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Term Promissory Note dated September 29, 2009 in the principal
amount of $65,000,000 between Delek US Holdings, Inc. and
Delek Petroleum, Ltd. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) under the Securities
Exchange Act. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Companys Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
51