e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 001-34571
PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
27-1055421
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2 Bethesda Metro Center, Suite 1530
Bethesda, Maryland
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
20814
(Zip Code) |
(240) 507-1300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at July 29, 2011 |
Common shares of beneficial interest ($0.01 par value per share)
|
|
50,897,688 |
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
1,120,085 |
|
|
$ |
599,714 |
|
Ground lease asset, net |
|
|
10,612 |
|
|
|
10,721 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
139,999 |
|
|
|
220,722 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
6,729 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $27 and $13, respectively) |
|
|
13,752 |
|
|
|
3,924 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
24,734 |
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,319,953 |
|
|
$ |
855,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage debt |
|
|
252,114 |
|
|
|
143,570 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
30,325 |
|
|
|
15,799 |
|
Advance deposits |
|
|
4,667 |
|
|
|
2,482 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Distribution payable |
|
|
8,297 |
|
|
|
4,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
296,188 |
|
|
|
167,063 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares of beneficial interest, stated at liquidation preference $25 per
share, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 5,000,000 and 0 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized;
50,771,380 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 39,814,760 issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
920,297 |
|
|
|
698,100 |
|
Accumulated deficit and distributions |
|
|
(24,320 |
) |
|
|
(11,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,021,485 |
|
|
|
686,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,023,765 |
|
|
|
688,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
1,319,953 |
|
|
$ |
855,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per-share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
$ |
45,601 |
|
|
$ |
1,360 |
|
|
|
71,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,360 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
23,166 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
37,953 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
4,343 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
6,662 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
73,110 |
|
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
115,775 |
|
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
|
11,866 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
19,507 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Food and beverage |
|
|
15,827 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
26,687 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
Other direct |
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Other indirect |
|
|
19,860 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
32,936 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
49,475 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
82,213 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,592 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
12,389 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and property insurance |
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
5,081 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Ground rent |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
4,726 |
|
|
|
3,642 |
|
Hotel acquisition costs |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
6,902 |
|
|
|
108,611 |
|
|
|
8,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
8,215 |
|
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
|
(6,262 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
5,109 |
|
|
|
(3,788 |
) |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
(4,387 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
4,299 |
|
|
|
(3,814 |
) |
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
(4,413 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company |
|
|
4,214 |
|
|
|
(3,814 |
) |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
(4,413 |
) |
Distributions to preferred shareholders |
|
|
(2,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
|
$ |
(3,814 |
) |
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares, basic and diluted |
|
|
50,193,672 |
|
|
|
20,260,590 |
|
|
|
45,026,715 |
|
|
|
20,260,319 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
(4,413 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,389 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of ground lease |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash, net |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel receivables |
|
|
(8,822 |
) |
|
|
(830 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(3,510 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
11,193 |
|
|
|
3,613 |
|
Advance deposits |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
15,381 |
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of hotel properties |
|
|
(467,135 |
) |
|
|
(157,078 |
) |
Improvements and additions to hotel properties |
|
|
(17,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deposit on investment in joint venture |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,500 |
) |
Investment in certificates of deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
Redemption of certificates of deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
Purchase of corporate office equipment, computer software, and furniture |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(409 |
) |
Restricted cash, net |
|
|
(2,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(496,609 |
) |
|
|
(134,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
|
235,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from issuance of preferred shares |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of offering costs common and preferred shares |
|
|
(14,215 |
) |
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
Contributions from non-controlling interest |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage debt |
|
|
67,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of mortgage debt |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of shares |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions common shares/units |
|
|
(9,807 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distributions preferred shares/units |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
400,505 |
|
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(80,723 |
) |
|
|
(137,061 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
220,722 |
|
|
|
319,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
139,999 |
|
|
$ |
182,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (the Company) was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust
on October 2, 2009 to opportunistically acquire and invest in hotel properties located primarily in
major United States cities, with an emphasis on major coastal markets.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company owned 14 hotels with a total of 3,812 guest rooms located in
the following markets: Atlanta (Buckhead), Georgia; Bethesda, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts;
Miami, Florida; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; San Diego, California; San
Francisco, California; Santa Monica, California; Seattle, Washington; Stevenson, Washington; and
Washington, D.C.
Substantially all of the Companys assets are held by, and all of the operations are conducted
through, Pebblebrook Hotel, L.P., (the Operating Partnership). The Company is the sole general
partner of the Operating Partnership. At June 30, 2011, the Company owned 98.2 percent of the
common Operating Partnership units issued by the Operating Partnership. The remaining 1.8 percent
of the common units issued by the Operating Partnership are owned by the other limited partners of
the Operating Partnership. For the Company to qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT)
under the Internal Revenue Code, it cannot operate the hotels it owns. Therefore, its Operating
Partnership and its subsidiaries lease the hotel properties to subsidiaries of Pebblebrook Hotel
Lessee, Inc. (collectively, PHL), the Companys taxable REIT subsidiary (TRS), which in turn
engages third-party eligible independent contractors to manage the hotels. PHL is consolidated into
the Companys financial statements.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and in
conformity with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
applicable to interim financial information. As such, certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in
accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. These unaudited consolidated financial
statements include all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated
balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash flows for
the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of full-year performance, as
the Company continues to deploy the net proceeds from its equity offerings to acquire hotel assets
and as a result of the impact of seasonal and other short-term variations. These consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries in accordance with U.S. GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The Companys comprehensive income (loss) equals its net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders and
the Company had no items classified as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses. These estimates are
prepared using managements best judgment, after considering past, current and expected events and
economic conditions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
6
Investment in Hotel Properties
Upon acquisition of hotel properties, the Company allocates the purchase price based on the
fair value of the acquired land, land improvements, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment,
identifiable intangible assets or liabilities, other assets and assumed liabilities. Identifiable
intangible assets or liabilities typically arise from contractual arrangement terms that are above
or below market compared to an estimated market agreement at the acquisition date. Acquisition-date
fair values of assets and assumed liabilities are determined based on replacement costs, appraised
values, and estimated fair values using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers and
that use appropriate discount and/or capitalization rates and available market information.
Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.
Hotel renovations and replacements of assets that improve or extend the life of the asset are
recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Furniture, fixtures and
equipment under capital leases are recorded at the present value of the minimum lease payments.
Repair and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Hotel properties are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over an
estimated useful life of 15 to 40 years for buildings, land improvements, and building improvements
and one to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized
over the shorter of the lease term or the useful lives of the related assets. Intangible assets
arising from contractual arrangements are typically amortized over the life of the contract. The
Company is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives and classification of
properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation expense to reflect each year with
respect to the assets. These assessments may impact the Companys results of operations.
The Company reviews its investments in hotel properties for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the hotel properties may not be
recoverable. Events or circumstances that may cause a review include, but are not limited to, when
a hotel property experiences a current or projected loss from operations, when it becomes more
likely than not that a hotel property will be sold before the end of its useful life, adverse
changes in the demand for lodging at the properties due to declining national or local economic
conditions and/or new hotel construction in markets where the hotels are located. When such
conditions exist, the Company performs an analysis to determine if the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows from operations and the proceeds from the ultimate disposition of a hotel exceed
its carrying value. If the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying
amount of the asset, an adjustment to reduce the carrying amount to the related hotels estimated
fair market value is recorded and an impairment loss recognized. In the evaluation of impairment of
its hotel properties, the Company makes many assumptions and estimates including projected cash
flows both from operations and eventual disposition, expected useful life and holding period,
future required capital expenditures, and fair values, including consideration of capitalization
rates, discount rates, and comparable selling prices. The Company will adjust its assumptions with
respect to the remaining useful life of the hotel property when circumstances change or it is more
likely than not that the hotel property will be sold prior to its previously expected useful life.
The Company will classify a hotel as held for sale when a binding agreement to purchase the
property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of nonrefundable
cash, no significant financing contingencies exist, and the sale is expected to close within one
year. If these criteria are met and if the fair value less costs to sell is lower than the carrying
amount of the hotel, the Company will record an impairment loss and will cease recording
depreciation expense. The Company will classify the loss, together with the related operating
results, as discontinued operations on the statements of operations and classify the assets and
related liabilities as held for sale on the balance sheet.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue consists of amounts derived from hotel operations, including the sales of rooms, food
and beverage, and other ancillary amenities. Revenue is recognized when rooms are occupied and
services have been rendered. The Company collects sales, use, occupancy and similar taxes at its
hotels which are presented on a net basis on the statement of operations.
Income Taxes
To qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the Company must meet a number of
organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute
at least 90 percent of its adjusted taxable income to its shareholders. As a REIT, the Company
generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of its taxable income
that is currently distributed to shareholders. The Company may be subject to certain state and
local taxes on its income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed
taxable income. In addition, the Companys wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiary, which leases the
Companys hotels from the Operating Partnership, is subject to federal and state income taxes. The
Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized
7
for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Valuation
allowances are provided if, based upon the weight of the available evidence, it is more likely than
not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to
common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders as
adjusted for potentially dilutive securities, by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding plus potentially dilutive securities. Any anti-dilutive securities are excluded from
the diluted per-share calculation.
Note 3. Acquisition of Hotel Properties
On February 16, 2011, the Company acquired the 252-room Argonaut Hotel located in San
Francisco, California for $84.0 million. The acquisition was funded with $42.0 million of available
cash and the assumption of a $42.0 million first mortgage loan. The hotel is subject to a long-term
ground lease agreement with the United States Department of the Interior that expires in 2059. The
hotel is required to pay the greater of a base rent of $1.2 million, as adjusted for consumer price
index CPI increases, or a percentage of rooms revenues, food and beverage revenues, and other
department revenues in excess of certain thresholds, as defined in the agreement. The fee, as a
percentage of rooms revenues, ranges from 8% to 12% in the initial years and 12% to 14% in the
later years. The fee as a percentage of food and beverage and other department revenues is 4% over
the term of the lease. The terms of the ground lease were evaluated and they were determined to
approximate current market terms. The Company retained Kimpton Hotels and Restaurants to manage the
hotel.
On April 6, 2011, the Company acquired the 450-room Westin Gaslamp Quarter located in San
Diego, California for $110.0 million. Prior to the acquisition, the hotel was undergoing a $25.0
million renovation project and, in addition to the purchase price, the Company reimbursed the
seller approximately $8.6 million for the renovation costs incurred and paid by the seller through
the date of closing. The remaining renovation costs will be paid by the Company. The Company
retained Starwood Hotels and Resorts to manage the hotel.
On April 7, 2011, the Company acquired the 189-room Hotel Monaco Seattle located in Seattle,
Washington for $51.2 million. The Company retained Kimpton Hotels and Restaurants to manage the
hotel.
On May 3, 2011, the Company acquired the 237-room Mondrian Los Angeles located in Los Angeles,
California for $137.0 million. The Company retained the Morgans Hotel Group to manage the hotel.
On May 26, 2011, the Company acquired the 148-room Viceroy Miami located in Miami, Florida for
$36.5 million. The Company retained the Viceroy Hotel Group to manage the hotel and PHL received
$3.0 million in key money from Viceroy Hotel Group to enter into the management agreement with
Viceroy Hotel Group which is amortized through management fee expense over the ten-year term of the
agreement.
On June 8, 2011, the Company acquired the 235-room W Boston located in Boston Massachusetts
for $89.5 million. The Company retained Starwood Hotels and Resorts to manage the hotel.
The allocation of fair value to the acquired assets and liabilities is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westin |
|
|
Hotel |
|
|
Mondrian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argonaut |
|
|
Gaslamp |
|
|
Monaco |
|
|
Los |
|
|
Viceroy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Seattle |
|
|
Angeles |
|
|
Miami |
|
|
W Boston |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,537 |
|
|
$ |
10,105 |
|
|
$ |
20,306 |
|
|
$ |
8,368 |
|
|
$ |
19,453 |
|
|
$ |
83,769 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
79,492 |
|
|
|
86,113 |
|
|
|
38,888 |
|
|
|
110,283 |
|
|
|
24,246 |
|
|
|
63,893 |
|
|
|
402,915 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
4,247 |
|
|
|
6,826 |
|
|
|
2,073 |
|
|
|
6,091 |
|
|
|
3,723 |
|
|
|
5,887 |
|
|
|
28,847 |
|
In place lease assets |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
Net working capital |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
(2,324 |
) |
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
84,193 |
|
|
$ |
117,623 |
|
|
$ |
50,899 |
|
|
$ |
136,829 |
|
|
$ |
36,354 |
|
|
$ |
88,237 |
|
|
$ |
514,135 |
|
|
|
|
The results of operations of the Argonaut Hotel, Westin Gaslamp Quarter, Hotel Monaco Seattle,
Mondrian Los Angeles, Viceroy Miami and W Boston are included in the consolidated statements of
operations beginning on their acquisition dates. The following
8
unaudited pro forma financial information presents the results of operations of the Company
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 as if the hotels acquired in 2010 and
2011 were acquired on January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for
comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of either the results of operations
that would have actually occurred had these transactions occurred on January 1, 2010 or the future
results of operations (in thousands, except per-share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months |
|
|
For the six months |
|
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
84,891 |
|
|
$ |
81,384 |
|
|
$ |
158,003 |
|
|
$ |
149,528 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
10,841 |
|
|
|
9,285 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
10,445 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
|
3,992 |
|
|
|
7,314 |
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
6,616 |
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
In June 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to invest approximately $153.6 million,
subject to working capital and other similar adjustments, for a 49% equity interest in a joint
venture that owns six Manhattan hotel properties in New York, New York (the Manhattan
Collection). The Company placed a $10.0 million deposit on this investment as of June 30, 2011.
The hotels are subject to approximately $596.6 million in existing first mortgage and mezzanine
debt and matures in February 2013. The Company is not a guarantor of any existing debt of the joint venture except for limited
customary carve-outs related to fraud or misapplication of funds. On July 29, 2011, the Company
closed on this investment using approximately $101.6 million in available cash, $10.0 million from
the deposit previously placed in escrow, and $42.0 million from borrowings on its credit facility.
The Company incurred approximately $8.2 million in acquisition costs related to this investment.
Note 4. Investment in Hotel Properties
Investment in hotel properties as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
190,197 |
|
|
$ |
106,428 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
873,815 |
|
|
|
460,988 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
73,992 |
|
|
|
37,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties |
|
$ |
1,138,004 |
|
|
$ |
605,382 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(17,919 |
) |
|
|
(5,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
1,120,085 |
|
|
$ |
599,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5. Debt
Senior Credit Facility
On June 3, 2011, the Company amended and restated in its entirety the credit agreement that it
had entered into in July 2010. The Companys credit facility is now unsecured and its borrowing
capacity is now $200.0 million, an increase of $50.0 million as compared to the prior credit
facilitys capacity. The credit facility matures on June 3, 2014, and the Company has a one-year
extension option. The Company has the ability to increase the credit facility borrowings up to
$400.0 million with lender approval. Borrowings on the credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus
2.5% to 3.5%, depending on the Companys leverage ratio. Additionally, the Company is required to
pay an unused commitment fee at an annual rate of 0.35% or 0.50% of the unused portion of the
senior credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings outstanding. The credit facility
contains certain financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum debt service
coverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, and minimum net worth. The Company incurred
approximately $1.3 million in fees in connection with this amendment which are amortized over the
term of the credit facility. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no
outstanding borrowings under the credit facility. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in
compliance with the credit facility debt covenants. For the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, the Company incurred unused commitment fees of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
The Company incurred no unused commitment fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
9
Mortgage Debt
Each of the Companys mortgage loans is secured by a first-mortgage lien on the underlying
property. The mortgages are non-recourse to the Company except for fraud or misapplication of
funds.
On January 6, 2011, the Company entered into a first-mortgage loan on the Skamania Lodge. The
debt has a principal balance of $31.0 million, a term of five years, bears interest at 5.44% and
requires monthly principal and interest payments of $174,898.
On January 21, 2011, the Company entered into a first-mortgage loan on the DoubleTree by
Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC. The debt has a principal balance of $36.0 million, a term of five
years, bears interest at 5.28% and requires interest-only payments for the first twelve months and,
beginning in March 2012, will require monthly principal and interest payments of $199,407 through
February 2016, the maturity date.
In conjunction with the Companys acquisition of the Argonaut Hotel, the Company assumed a
$42.0 million interest-only first mortgage loan. The debt matures in March 2012 and has a fixed
annual interest rate of 5.67%.
Mortgage debt as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Outstanding as of |
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Maturity Date |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Sofitel Philadelphia |
|
Floating(1) |
|
February 2012 |
|
$ |
56,070 |
|
|
$ |
56,070 |
|
Monaco Washington DC |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
March 2012 |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Argonaut Hotel |
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
March 2012 |
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
InterContinental Buckhead |
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
January 2016 |
|
|
52,182 |
|
|
|
52,500 |
|
Skamania Lodge |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
30,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
DoubleTree by Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC |
|
|
5.28 |
% |
|
February 2016 |
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
252,114 |
|
|
$ |
143,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mortgage debt bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.3%. The interest rates as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010 were 1.49% and 1.57%, respectively. |
The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt by discounting the future cash
flows of each instrument at estimated market rates, taking into consideration general market
conditions and maturity. The estimated fair value of the Companys debt as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 was $251.4 million and $143.9 million, respectively.
The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants as of June 30, 2011.
Note 6. Equity
Common Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest
(common shares), $.01 par value per share. Each outstanding common share entitles the holder to
one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Holders of the Companys common shares
are entitled to receive dividends when authorized by our board of trustees.
On April 6, 2011, the Company issued 10,925,000 common shares and raised $226.5 million, net
of underwriting discounts and offering costs, in a follow-on offering of common shares.
On April 13, 2011, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC.
Under this shelf registration statement, the Company may issue common shares, preferred shares,
debt securities, warrants and units from time to time.
Common Dividends
The Company paid or will pay the following dividends on common shares/units during the six
months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per |
|
For the quarter |
|
|
|
|
Share/Unit |
|
ended |
|
Record Date |
|
Payable Date |
$0.12 |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
April 15, 2011 |
$0.12 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
July 15, 2011 |
10
Preferred Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares, $.01 par value per
share.
The Company had no preferred shares outstanding as of December 31, 2010. On March 11, 2011,
the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of its 7.875% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
(Series A Preferred Shares) at a public offering price of $25.00 per share, for a total of
approximately $120.9 million of net proceeds, after deducting the underwriting discount and other
offering-related costs.
On July 14, 2011, the Company issued 600,000 Series A Preferred Shares at a price of $25.25
per share for a total of approximately $15.1 million in net proceeds.
Preferred Dividends
The Company paid or will pay the following dividends on preferred shares/units during the six
months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend per |
|
For the quarter |
|
|
|
|
Share/Unit |
|
ended |
|
Record Date |
|
Payable Date |
$0.19 (1) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
April 15, 2011 |
$0.49 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
July 15, 2011 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pro-rata payment for the partial quarter from the date of issuance. |
Non-controlling Interest of Common Units in Operating Partnership
Holders of Operating Partnership units have certain redemption rights which enable the unit
holders to cause the Operating Partnership to redeem their units in exchange for, at the Companys
option, cash per unit equal to the market price of the Companys common shares, at the time of
redemption or for the Companys common shares on a one-for-one basis. The number of shares issuable
upon exercise of the redemption rights will be adjusted upon the occurrence of share splits,
mergers, consolidations or similar pro-rata share transactions, which otherwise would have the
effect of diluting the ownership interests of our limited partners or our shareholders.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Operating Partnership had 929,099 and 0 units,
respectively, outstanding, all of which are long-term incentive partnership units that have reached
parity with other common Operating Partnership units. As of June 30, 2011, 185,820 of these LTIP
units have vested. Only vested LTIP units may be converted to common units of the Operating
Partnership which in turn can be redeemed for an equal number of common shares in the Company. As
of June 30, 2011, no LTIP units have been converted to common shares.
Note 7. Share-Based Compensation Plan
The Company maintains the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan to attract and retain independent
trustees, executive officers and other key employees and service providers. The plan provides for
the grant of options to purchase common shares, share awards, share appreciation rights,
performance units and other equity-based awards. Share awards under this plan generally vest over
three to five years. The Company pays dividends on unvested shares. Certain share awards may
provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control. As of June 30, 2011, there were
224,317 common shares available for issuance under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.
11
The following table provides a summary of restricted share activity as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Unvested at January 1, 2011 |
|
|
78,440 |
|
|
$ |
20.88 |
|
Granted |
|
|
79,330 |
|
|
|
22.03 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(22,709 |
) |
|
|
20.98 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2,232 |
) |
|
|
21.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
132,829 |
|
|
$ |
21.54 |
|
The fair value of each restricted share award is determined based on the closing price of the
Companys common shares on the grant date. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the
Company recognized approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of share-based
compensation expense related to these restricted shares in the consolidated statements of
operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized approximately
$0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of share-based compensation expense related to these
restricted shares in the consolidated statements of operations. As of June 30, 2011, there was $2.5
million of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested restricted
shares. The unrecognized share-based compensation expense is expected to be recognized over the
weighted-average remaining vesting period of 2.3 years.
Long-Term Incentive Partnership Units
Long-Term Incentive Partnership (LTIP) units, which are also referred to as profits interest
units, may be issued to eligible participants for the performance of services to or for the benefit
of the Operating Partnership. LTIP units are a class of partnership unit in the Companys Operating
Partnership and will receive, whether vested or not, the same per-unit profit distributions as the
other outstanding units in the Operating Partnership, which equal per-share distributions on common
shares. Prior to reaching parity with common units, LTIP units have a capital account balance of
zero, do not receive an allocation of net income (loss) and do not have full parity with the common
Operating Partnership units with respect to liquidating distributions. If such parity is reached,
vested LTIP units may be converted, at any time, into an equal number of common Operating
Partnership units and thereafter will possess all of the rights and interests of a common Operating
Partnership unit, including the right to redeem the common Operating Partnership unit for a common
share in the Company or cash, at the option of the Operating Partnership.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had 929,099 LTIP units outstanding. All of the LTIP units are
held by officers of the Company as of June 30, 2011. These LTIP units vest ratably on each of the
first five anniversaries of their date of grant. The LTIP units were valued using a Monte Carlo
simulation method model. The LTIP unit grants were valued at $8.50 per LTIP unit. As of June 30,
2011, 185,820 units have vested.
The Company recognized $0.4 million and $0.8 million in share-based compensation expense
related to the LTIP units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 respectively and $0.4
million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2011,
there was $5.5 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to LTIP
units. This unrecognized share-based compensation expense is expected to be recognized over the
weighted- average remaining vesting period of 3.5 years. The accrued expense related to the LTIP
unit grants is presented as non-controlling interest in the Companys consolidated balance sheets.
Upon the closing of the Companys equity offering of common shares on April 6, 2011, the
Company determined that a revaluation event occurred, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, and
the LTIP units achieved full parity with the common Operating Partnership units with respect to
liquidating distributions and all other purposes. These LTIP units are allocated their pro-rata
share of the Companys net income (loss).
Note 8. Earnings per Common Share
The following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in
thousands, except share and per-share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
|
$ |
(3,814 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,413 |
) |
Less: dividends paid on unvested restricted shares |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: dividends paid on LTIP units |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders-basic and
diluted |
|
$ |
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
(3,814 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,092 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares basic and diluted |
|
|
50,193,672 |
|
|
|
20,260,590 |
|
|
|
45,026,715 |
|
|
|
20,260,319 |
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders
basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.19 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
12
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, 132,829 of unvested restricted shares and
929,099 of LTIP units were excluded from diluted weighted-average common shares, as their effect
would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, 83,747 unvested
restricted shares were excluded from diluted weighted-average common shares, as their effect would
have been anti-dilutive.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
Management Agreements
The Companys hotel properties operate pursuant to separate management agreements for each
property with various management companies. The initial terms of these management agreements range
from 5 years to 20 years, not including renewals, and 5 years to 40 years, including renewals. Many
of the Companys management agreements are terminable at will by the Company upon paying a
termination fee and some are terminable by the Company upon sale of the property, with in some
cases, the payment of termination fees. Most of the agreements also provide the Company the ability
to terminate based on failure to achieve defined operating performance thresholds. Termination fees
range from zero to up to six times the annual base management and incentive management fees,
depending on the agreement and the reason for termination. Certain of the Companys management
agreements are non-terminable except upon the managers breach of a material representation or the
managers failure to meet performance thresholds as defined in the management agreement.
The management agreements require the payment of a base management fee generally between 2%
and 4% of hotel revenues. Under certain management agreements, the management companies are also
eligible to receive an incentive management fee if hotel operating income, cash flows or other
performance measures, as defined in the agreements, exceeds certain performance thresholds. The
incentive management fee is generally calculated as a percentage of hotel operating income after
the Company has received a priority return on its investment in the hotel. Combined base and
incentive management fees were $2.1 million and $3.3 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, and $0.1 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
Reserve Funds
Certain of the Companys agreements with its hotel managers, franchisors and lenders have
provisions for the Company to provide funds, typically 4.0% of hotel revenues, sufficient to cover
the cost of (a) certain non-routine repairs and maintenance to the hotels and (b) replacements and
renewals to the hotels furniture, fixtures and equipment.
Restricted Cash
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $6.7 million and $4.5 million,
respectively, in restricted cash, which consists of reserves for replacement of furniture and
fixtures or reserves to pay for real estate taxes or property insurance under certain hotel
management agreements or lender requirements.
Ground Lease
The Monaco Washington DC is subject to a long-term ground lease agreement on the land
underlying the hotel. The ground lease expires in 2059. The hotel is required to pay the greater of
a base rent of $0.2 million or a percentage of gross hotel revenues and gross food and beverage
revenues in excess of certain thresholds, as defined in the agreement. The lease contains certain
restrictions on modifications that can be made to the structure due to its status as a national
historic landmark.
The Company assumed a long-term ground lease agreement in connection with its acquisition of
the Argonaut Hotel. The ground lease expires in 2059. The hotel is required to pay the greater of a
base rent of $1.2 million or a percentage of rooms revenues, food
13
and beverage revenues and other department revenues in excess of certain thresholds, as
defined in the agreement. The lease contains certain restrictions on modifications that can be made
to the structure due to its status as a national historic landmark.
Litigation
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels, the Company and the Operating
Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The
Company may obtain insurance to cover certain potential material losses. The Company is not
presently subject to any material litigation nor, to the Companys knowledge, is any material
litigation threatened against the Company.
Note 10. Supplemental Information to Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
( in thousands) |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
5,086 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable to common shares/units |
|
$ |
6,219 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable to preferred shares/units |
|
$ |
2,078 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares for board of trustees compensation |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loan assumed in connection with acquisition |
|
$ |
42,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit applied to purchase price of acquisition |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Subsequent Events
On July 14, 2011, the Company issued 600,000 shares of its 7.875% Series A Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Shares at an offering price of $25.25 per share, for a total of approximately
$15.1 million of net proceeds.
On July 29, 2011, the Company closed on its $153.6 million investment for a 49% equity
interest in the Manhattan Collection. The hotels are subject to approximately $596.6 million in
existing first mortgage and mezzanine debt and matures in February 2013. The Company incurred approximately $8.2
million in acquisition costs related to this investment.
14
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
is a Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT. Substantially all of the operations are
conducted through Pebblebrook Hotel, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), a Delaware limited
partnership of which Pebblebrook Hotel Trust is the sole general partner. In this report, we use
the terms the Company, we or our to refer to Pebblebrook Hotel Trust and its subsidiaries,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the
Company, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking
statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and
expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words may, will, should, potential,
could, predict, continue, believe, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, project,
forecast or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include, among others,
statements about our business strategy, including our acquisition and development strategies,
industry trends, estimated revenues and expenses, ability to realize deferred tax assets and
expected liquidity needs and sources (including capital expenditures and the ability to obtain
financing or raise capital). You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that are, in some cases, beyond our
control and which could materially affect actual results, performances or achievements. Factors
that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
the timing and availability of potential hotel acquisitions and our ability to
identify and complete hotel acquisitions in accordance with our business strategy; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the hotel industry, including competition, increases in
employment costs, energy costs and other operating costs, or decreases in demand caused
by actual or threatened terrorist attacks, any type of flu or disease-related pandemic,
or downturns in general and local economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
the availability and terms of financing and capital and the general volatility of
securities markets; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on third-party managers of our hotels, including our inability to
implement strategic business decisions directly; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the real estate industry, including environmental
contamination and costs of complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act and similar
laws; |
|
|
|
|
interest rate increases; |
|
|
|
|
our possible failure to qualify as a REIT and the risk of changes in laws affecting
REITs; |
|
|
|
|
the possibility of uninsured losses; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with redevelopment and repositioning projects, including delays
and overruns; and |
|
|
|
|
the other factors discussed under the heading Risk Factors in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as updated elsewhere in
this report. |
Accordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations will be realized. Except as otherwise
required by the federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligations or undertaking to publicly
release any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein (or elsewhere)
to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions
or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
15
Overview
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust is an internally managed hotel investment company, organized in
October 2009, to opportunistically acquire and invest in hotel properties located primarily in
major U.S. cities, with an emphasis on the major coastal markets. As of June 30, 2011, we owned 14
hotels with a total of 3,812 guest rooms located in eight states and the District of Columbia.
During the second quarter of 2011, we raised $226.5 million from the follow-on equity offering
of 10.9 million common shares and acquired five additional hotel properties, The Westin Gaslamp
Quarter for $110.0 million, Hotel Monaco Seattle for $51.2 million, Mondrian Los Angeles for $137.0
million, Viceroy Miami for $36.5 million and W Boston for $89.5 million. In addition, in July
2011, we invested approximately $153.6 million for a 49% equity interest in a joint venture that
owns six Manhattan hotel properties in New York, New York.
In addition to being active with acquisitions and capital raising activities, we have been
actively employing our asset management initiatives at the properties we currently own. While we do
not operate our hotel properties, both our asset management team and our executive management team
monitor and work cooperatively with our hotel managers in all aspects of our hotels operations,
including property positioning and repositioning, revenue management, operations analysis, physical
design, renovation and capital improvements, guest experience and overall strategic direction.
Through these efforts, we seek to improve property efficiencies, lower costs, maximize revenues,
and enhance property operating margins which will enhance returns to our shareholders. During the
six months ended June 30, 2011, we completed renovation projects at the Sir Francis Drake, The
Grand Minneapolis and DoubleTree by Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC hotels. We expect to invest
approximately $63.0 million to $68.0 million, including
amounts paid upon acquisition of the Westin Gaslamp Quarter, in 2011 on renovation and repositioning projects and other capital
improvements.
The U.S. hotel industry sustained its strong recovery during the second quarter of 2011
despite the impact of negative unemployment and housing data, commodity inflation, foreign debt
concerns and deterioration in some economic indicators. Driven by continued strength in corporate
transient and group travel and increased international travel on the basis of a weak dollar and
growth in developing countries, the increased demand has fueled rising industry occupancies and
significant growth in average daily rates. Additionally, as a result of positive industry
fundamentals, acquisition transaction volume has seen significant year-over-year growth, still
primarily driven by lodging REITs and their lower cost of capital.
We remain optimistic about the lodging industry as a whole with industry supply growth
declining to below 1% and demand growth forecasted to continue to grow as the economy grows,
increasing occupancies allowing for further increases in ADR.
Key Indicators of Financial Condition and Operating Performance
We measure hotel results of operations and the operating performance of our business by
evaluating financial and nonfinancial metrics such as room revenue per available room (RevPAR);
average daily rate (ADR); occupancy rate (occupancy); funds from operations (FFO); earnings
before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA); and hotel EBITDA. We
evaluate individual hotel and company-wide performance with comparisons to budgets, prior periods
and competing properties. ADR, occupancy and RevPAR may be impacted by macroeconomic factors as
well as regional and local economies and events. See Non-GAAP Financial Matters for further
discussion of FFO and EBITDA.
Results of Operations
Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 include the operating
activities of the 14 hotels we owned since their respective dates of acquisition. We owned two
hotel properties, the DoubleTree by Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC and Sir Francis Drake, at June
30, 2010. Our net income attributable to common shareholders for the three months ended June 30,
2011 was $1.8 million compared with a net loss attributable to common shareholders of $3.8 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Our net loss attributable to common shareholders for the
six months ended June 30, 2011 was $1.8 million compared with a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Comparison of three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to three and six months ended June 30, 2010
The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 include the
operating activity of the two hotels for the periods from acquisition of each hotel to June 30,
2010. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011
include the operating activity for the eight hotels acquired in 2010 for the full periods and
the operating activity for the six hotels acquired in 2011 for the periods from acquisition of each
hotel to June 30, 2011.
16
Revenues Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $73.1 million
and $115.8 million, respectively, due to the additional twelve hotels acquired since June 2010.
Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were $2.2 million.
Hotel operating expenses Hotel operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011 increased to $49.5 million and $82.2 million, respectively, due to the additional twelve
hotels acquired since June 2010. Hotel operating expenses for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 were $1.4 million.
Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization expense for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 increased by approximately $7.4 million and $12.2 million, respectively, as a
result of the additional 12 hotels we acquired since June 2010.
Real estate taxes, personal property taxes and property insurance Real estate taxes, personal
property taxes and insurance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by
approximately $3.1 million and $5.0 million, respectively, as a result of the additional 12 hotels
we acquired since June 2010.
Ground rent Ground rent expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by
approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, resulting from the acquisitions of the
Hotel Monaco DC and the Argonaut Hotel, both of which are subject to long-term ground lease
arrangements.
Corporate general and administrative Total corporate general and administrative expenses for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased by approximately $0.3 million and $1.1 million,
respectively, as a result for growth in our portfolio since June 2010. Corporate general and
administrative expenses consist of employee compensation costs, professional fees, insurance and
other expenses.
Hotel property acquisition costs Hotel property acquisition costs for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 decreased by approximately $1.3 million from the three months ended June 30, 2010
primarily because the majority of the costs for the acquisitions made during the second quarter
of 2011 were incurred in the first quarter of 2011. In addition, the cost per
acquisition decreased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily as a result of higher transfer taxes and
legal fees associated with the DoubleTree by Hilton Bethesda-Washington DC which was acquired in
June 2010. Hotel property acquisition costs for the six months ended June 30, 2011, increased by
approximately $0.3 million as a result of six hotel acquisitions purchased in 2011 compared to two
hotel acquisitions purchased in 2010.
Interest income Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased from
the prior periods by approximately $0.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, as a result of cash
being used to acquire hotel properties resulting in a lower average cash balance as well as a
decrease in the interest rate on cash deposits.
Interest expense Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased
from the prior periods by approximately $3.4 million and $6.3 million, respectively, due to the
Company arranging or assuming mortgage financings on certain properties acquired after June 2010
while the Company had no debt as of June 30, 2010. Interest expense includes unused commitment
fees on our credit facility, interest on our mortgage debt and amortization of deferred financing
fees.
Income tax expense Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 increased
from the prior periods by approximately $0.8 million and $0.4 million respectively as a result of
income generated from the additional twelve hotels we acquired since June 2010.
Non-controlling interests Non-controlling interests represent the allocation of income or loss of
the Operating Partnership to the common units held by the LTIP unit holders. There was no
allocation of income or loss to these unit holders in 2010 as these units did not reach parity with
the common shares until April 2011.
Distributions to preferred shareholders Distributions to preferred shareholders for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately $2.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
The Company issued a series of preferred shares in March 2011. We had no preferred shares issued
in 2010.
17
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Non-GAAP financial measures are measures of our historical or future financial performance
that are different from measures calculated and presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We report
FFO and EBITDA, which are non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors as
key measures of our operating performance.
We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income (calculated in accordance with
GAAP), excluding depreciation and amortization, gains (losses) from sales of real estate, the
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles and adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets implicitly
assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate
values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, most industry investors
consider presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost
accounting to be insufficient by themselves. By excluding the effect of depreciation and
amortization and gains (losses) from sales of real estate, both of which are based on historical
cost accounting and which may be of lesser significance in evaluating current performance, we
believe that FFO provides investors a useful financial measure to evaluate our operating
performance.
The following table reconciles net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders to FFO
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands except share and per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
|
$ |
(3,814 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,413 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,560 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
12,327 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO |
|
$ |
9,398 |
|
|
$ |
(3,609 |
) |
|
$ |
10,574 |
|
|
$ |
(4,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization. We believe that EBITDA provides investors a useful financial measure to evaluate our
operating performance, excluding the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest expense)
and our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization).
The following table reconciles net income (loss) attributable to shareholders to EBITDA for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, |
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
1,753 |
|
|
$ |
(3,814 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,413 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,592 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
12,389 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to preferred shareholders |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
16,147 |
|
|
$ |
(3,565 |
) |
|
$ |
20,366 |
|
|
$ |
(4,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither FFO nor EBITDA represent cash generated from operating activities as determined
by U.S. GAAP and neither should be considered as an alternative to U.S. GAAP net income (loss), as
an indication of our financial performance, or to U.S. GAAP cash flow from operating activities, as
a measure of liquidity. In addition, FFO and EBITDA are not indicative of funds available to fund
cash needs, including the ability to make cash distributions.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be
materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use
of assumptions as to future
18
uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain critical accounting
policies, are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under our senior
revolving credit facility. We expect our existing cash balances and cash provided by operations
will be adequate to fund operating requirements, pay interest on any borrowings and fund dividends
in accordance with the REIT requirements of the federal income tax laws.
We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as hotel property acquisitions,
property redevelopment, capital investments, and debt maturities, through the net proceeds from
additional issuances of common shares, issuances of preferred shares, issuances of units of limited
partnership interest in our operating partnership, secured and unsecured borrowings, and cash
provided by operations. The success of our business strategy may depend in part on our ability to
access additional capital through issuances of debt and equity securities, which is dependent on
favorable market conditions.
Over the long-term, we intend to limit the sum of the outstanding principal amount of our
consolidated net indebtedness to not more than 4.5x our EBITDA for the 12-month period preceding
the incurrence of that debt. Net indebtedness consists of total debt less cash and cash equivalents
and investments. Compliance with this limitation will be measured at the time debt is incurred, and
a subsequent decrease in EBITDA will not require us to repay debt. In addition, if we assume or
incur debt in connection with our hotel acquisitions, our debt level could exceed the general
limitation described above.
In July 2011, we invested approximately $153.6 million for a 49% equity interest in a joint
venture that owns six hotels in New York City. We funded this investment using approximately $101.6 million in available cash, $10.0 million from the deposit previously placed in
escrow, and $42.0 million from borrowings on our credit facility. The hotels are subject to approximately $596.6
million in existing first mortgage and mezzanine debt and matures in February 2013. The Company incurred approximately $8.2
million in acquisition costs related to this investment.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash are cash from operations, borrowings under mortgage financings,
draws on our credit facility and the proceeds from offerings of our equity securities. Our
principal uses of cash are asset acquisitions, debt service, capital investments, operating costs,
corporate expenses and dividends.
Cash provided by Operations. Our cash provided by operating activities was $15.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our cash from operations includes the operating activities of
the fourteen owned hotels. Our cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30,
2010 was $0.5 million and relates principally to the two hotels we owned at June 30, 2010.
Cash used in Investing Activities. Our cash used in investing activities was $496.6 million
and $135.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the six
months ended June 30, 2011, we used $467.1 million to acquire six hotels, incurred capital
investments of $17.1 million at our hotels, placed a deposit of $10.0 million related to the joint
venture investment and had an increase in restricted cash of $2.3 million. During the six months
ended June 30, 2010, we used $157.1 million to acquire two hotels, placed deposits of $7.5 million
on potential acquisitions and redeemed a net amount of $30.0 million in certificates of deposits.
Cash provided by Financing Activities.$400.5 million of cash was provided by financing
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011, which consisted of $236.0 million of proceeds
received from our public offering of approximately 10.9 million common shares and $125.0 million of
proceeds received from our offering of Series A preferred shares, both of which were offset by an
aggregate of approximately $14.2 million in offering-related costs. We also received $67.0 million
of proceeds from the mortgage debt placed on the Skamania Lodge and DoubleTree hotels and paid
$10.7 million in distributions during the period. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we paid
$1.5 million in offering-related costs for our December 2009 initial public offering of common
shares and concurrent private placement.
Capital Investments
We intend to maintain all of our hotels, and will maintain each hotel that we acquire in the
future, in good repair and condition and in conformity with applicable laws and regulations and
when applicable, in accordance with the franchisors standards and the agreed-
19
upon requirements in
our management agreements. Routine capital investments will be administered by the hotel management
companies. However, we maintain approval rights over the capital investments as part of the annual
budget process and as otherwise required from time to time.
From time to time, certain of our hotel properties may undergo renovations as a result of our
decision to upgrade portions of the hotels, such as guestrooms, meeting space and restaurants, in
order to better compete with other hotels in our markets. In addition, after we acquire a hotel
property, we are often required by the franchisor or brand manager, if there is one, to complete a
property improvement plan (PIP) in order to bring the hotel property up to the franchisors or
brands standards. Generally we expect to fund the renovations and improvements with cash and cash
equivalents, borrowings under our credit facility, or proceeds from new mortgage debt or equity
offerings.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we invested $17.1 million in capital investments to
reposition and improve the properties we owned. We expect to invest approximately $45.9 million to $50.9 million
in capital investments for the remainder of 2011.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The table below summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2011 and the effect such
obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Mortgage loans (1) |
|
$ |
283,103 |
|
|
$ |
144,335 |
|
|
$ |
15,657 |
|
|
$ |
123,111 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Ground leases (2) |
|
|
66,813 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
59,913 |
|
Purchase commitments (3) |
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
4,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate office lease |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
355,736 |
|
|
$ |
150,869 |
|
|
$ |
18,983 |
|
|
$ |
125,971 |
|
|
$ |
59,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts include interest expense. |
|
(2) |
|
The long-term ground leases on the Hotel Monaco Washington DC and the Argonaut Hotel provide
for the greater of base or percentage rent, adjusted for CPI increases. The table assumes base
rent for all periods presented and does not include assumptions for CPI adjustments. |
|
(3) |
|
These represent purchase orders and contracts that have been executed for renovation projects
at the properties. We are committed to these purchase orders and contracts and anticipate
making similar arrangements in the future with the existing properties or any future
properties that we may acquire. |
In July 2011, we invested approximately $153.6 million for a 49% equity interest in a joint
venture that owns six hotels in New York City. The hotels are subject to approximately $596.6
million in existing first mortgage and mezzanine debt and matures in February 2013. The Company incurred approximately $8.2
million in acquisition costs related to this investment.
Inflation
We rely on the performance of the hotels to increase revenues to keep pace with inflation. Our
hotel operators possess the ability to adjust room rates daily although competitive pressures may
limit the ability of our operators to raise rates faster than inflation or even at the same rate.
Seasonality
Demand in the lodging industry is affected by recurring seasonal patterns. Generally, we
expect that we will have lower revenue, operating income and cash flow in the first and fourth
quarters and higher revenue, operating income and cash flow in the second and third quarters. These
general trends are, however, expected to be greatly influenced by overall economic cycles and the
geographic locations of the hotels we acquire.
20
Derivative Instruments
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to the effects of interest rate changes. We
may enter into derivative instruments including interest rate swaps, caps and collars to manage or
hedge interest rate risk. Derivative instruments are subject to fair value reporting at each
reporting date and the increase or decrease in fair value is recorded in net income (loss) or
accumulated other comprehensive income, based on the applicable hedge accounting guidance. As of
June 30, 2011, we have an interest rate cap in connection with the mortgage debt assumed with the
acquisition of the Sofitel Philadelphia hotel. This interest rate cap was not designated as a
hedging instrument and as such changes in the fair value of the instrument have been recorded in
our statement of operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the interest rate
cap had an immaterial effect on our statement of operations. We did not utilize any derivative
instruments during the three or six months ended June 30, 2010.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. We seek to limit the impact of
interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs by
closely monitoring the Companys variable rate debt and converting such debt to fixed rates when
the Company deems such conversion advantageous. As of June 30, 2011, $56.1 million of the Companys
aggregate indebtedness (22% of total indebtedness) was subject to variable interest rates.
If market rates of interest on the Companys variable rate debt fluctuate by 0.25%, interest
expense would increase or decrease, depending on rate movement, future earnings and cash flows by
$0.1 million annually. This assumes that the amount outstanding under our variable rate debt
remains at $56.1 million, the balance as of June 30, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most
recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels and the Company to the risk of
claims and litigation in the normal course of business. We are not presently subject to any
material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, other than
routine actions for negligence or other claims and administrative proceedings arising in the
ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability insurance and
all of which collectively are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity,
results of operations or our financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Risk Factors
section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
21
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved.]
Item 5. Other information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3.1*
|
|
Declaration of Trust, as amended and supplemented of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between Mondrian Holdings LLC, as seller, and Wolverines Owner
LLC, as purchaser. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2011, among Pebblebrook Hotel,
L.P., as borrower, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust, as the parent REIT and a guarantor, certain
subsidiaries of the borrower, as guarantors, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,
and the other lenders party hereto. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Contribution Agreement by and among Denihan Ownership Company, LLC, Denihan Mezz Holding
Company, LLC and Cardinals Owner LLC, dated as of June 20, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
|
|
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS XBRL
|
|
Instance Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.SCH XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.CAL XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.LAB XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.PRE XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
(1) |
|
Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive
data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes
of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise
is not subject to liability under these sections. |
22
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST
|
|
Date: August 2, 2011 |
/s/ Jon E. Bortz
|
|
|
Jon E. Bortz |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
23
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3.1*
|
|
Declaration of Trust, as amended and supplemented of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between Mondrian Holdings LLC, as seller, and Wolverines Owner
LLC, as purchaser. |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2011, among Pebblebrook Hotel,
L.P., as borrower, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust, as the parent REIT and a guarantor, certain
subsidiaries of the borrower, as guarantors, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent,
and the other lenders party hereto. |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Contribution Agreement by and among Denihan Ownership Company, LLC, Denihan Mezz Holding
Company, LLC and Cardinals Owner LLC, dated as of June 20, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . |
|
|
|
32.2**
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS XBRL
|
|
Instance Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.SCH XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.CAL XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.LAB XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1) |
|
|
|
101.PRE XBRL
|
|
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
(1) |
|
Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive
data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes
of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise
is not subject to liability under these sections. |
24