e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-14429
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
95-4376145
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
228 Manhattan Beach Blvd., Manhattan Beach, California
|
|
90266 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (310) 318-3100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on
Which Registered |
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K(§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check
mark whether the
registrant is a
large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a
smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated
filer
and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company
o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2008, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting Class A and Class B
Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $657 million based upon the
closing price of $19.76 of the Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.
The number of shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding as of February 15, 2009: 33,412,409.
The number of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding as of February 15, 2009: 12,782,385.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement issued in connection with the 2009 Annual
Meeting of the Stockholders of the Registrant are incorporated by reference into Part III.
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
i
SPECIAL NOTE ON FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to
the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including
statements with regards to future revenue, projected 2009 results, earnings, spending, margins,
cash flow, orders, expected timing of shipment of products, inventory levels, future growth or
success in specific countries, categories or market sectors, continued or expected distribution to
specific retailers, liquidity, capital resources and market risk, strategies and objectives.
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or simply state future results, performance or achievements, and can be identified by the
use of forward looking language such as believe, anticipate, expect, estimate, intend,
plan, project, will be, will continue, will result, could, may, might, or any
variations of such words with similar meanings. Any such statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in
forward-looking statements.
Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include: international, national
and local general economic, political and market conditions including the recent global economic
slowdown and financial crisis; the ability to sustain, manage and forecast our costs and proper
inventory levels; the loss of any significant customers, decreased demand by industry retailers and
cancellation of order commitments due to the credit crisis in the global financial markets or other
difficulties in their businesses; the failure of financial institutions to fulfill their
commitments under our secured line of credit; changes in fashion trends and consumer demands; the
level of sales during the spring, back-to-school and holiday selling seasons; the ability to
anticipate, identify, interpret or forecast changes in fashion trends, consumer demand for the
products and the various market factors described above; new standards regarding lead content in
childrens products including footwear under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008;
the ability to maintain brand image; intense competition among sellers of footwear for consumers;
further changes to the global economic slowdown that could affect our ability to open retail stores
in new markets and/or the sales performance of existing stores; potential disruptions in
manufacturing related to overseas sourcing and concentration of production in China, including,
without limitation, difficulties associated with political instability in China, the occurrence of
a natural disaster or outbreak of a pandemic disease in China, or electrical shortages, labor
shortages or work stoppages that may lead to higher production costs and/or production delays;
changes in monetary controls and valuations of the Yuan by the Chinese government; increased costs
of freight and transportation to meet delivery deadlines; potential imposition of additional
duties, tariffs or other trade restrictions; violation of labor or other laws by independent
contract manufacturers, suppliers or licensees; popularity of particular designs and categories of
products; changes in business strategy or development plans; the ability to attract and retain
qualified personnel; the disruption, expense and potential liability associated with existing or
unanticipated future litigation; the ability to secure and protect trademarks, patents and other
intellectual property; business disruptions resulting from natural disasters such as an earthquake
due to the location of domestic warehouse, headquarters and a substantial number of retail stores
in California; and other factors referenced or incorporated by reference in this report and other
reports that we filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include
additional factors that could adversely impact our business and financial performance. We operate
in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and we
cannot predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on the
business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and
uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of
actual results. Moreover, reported results should not be considered an indication of future
performance. Investors should also be aware that while we do, from time to time, communicate with
securities analysts, we do not disclose any material non-public information or other confidential
commercial information to them. Accordingly, individuals should not assume that we agree with any
statement or report issued by any analyst, regardless of the content of the report. Thus, to the
extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections, forecasts or opinions,
such reports are not our responsibility.
1
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
We were incorporated in California in 1992 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1999. Throughout
this annual report, we refer to Skechers U.S.A., Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated
subsidiaries as we, us, our, our company and Skechers unless otherwise indicated. Our
Internet website address is www.skechers.com. Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Form 3s, 4s and 5s filed on behalf of directors,
officers and 10% stockholders, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge on our
website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the SEC. You can learn more about us by reviewing such filings on our website or at
the SECs website at www.sec.gov.
GENERAL
We design and market Skechers-branded contemporary footwear for men, women and children under
several unique lines. Our footwear reflects a combination of style, quality and value that appeals
to a broad range of consumers. In addition to Skechers-branded lines, we also offer several
uniquely branded designer, fashion and street-focused footwear lines for men, women and children.
These lines are branded and marketed separately from Skechers and appeal to specific audiences. Our
brands are sold through department stores, specialty stores, athletic retailers, and boutiques as
well as catalog and Internet retailers. Along with wholesale distribution, our footwear is
available at our e-commerce website and our own retail stores. We operate 84 concept stores, 83
factory outlet stores and 37 warehouse outlet stores in the United States, and 16 concept stores
and three factory outlets internationally. Our objective is to profitably grow our operations
worldwide while leveraging our recognizable Skechers brand through our strong product lines,
innovative advertising and diversified distribution channels.
We seek to offer consumers a vast array of fashionable footwear that satisfies their active,
casual, dress casual and dress footwear needs. Our core consumers are style-conscious 12 to 24
year-old men and women attracted to our youthful brand image and fashion forward designs. Many of
our best-selling and core styles are also developed for children with colors and materials that
reflect a playful image appropriate for this demographic.
We believe that brand recognition is an important element for success in the footwear
business. We have aggressively promoted our brands through comprehensive marketing campaigns for
men, women and children. During 2008, our Skechers brand was supported by print, television and
outdoor campaigns for men and women; animated kids television campaigns featuring our own action
heroes and characters; print and outdoor campaigns featuring our endorsee and American Idol winner
David Cook; and family-focused celebrity ads that included singer Brandy and reality stars Trista
and Ryan Sutter. Our Marc Ecko and Zoo York footwear lines are also supported by print and
television ads developed by Marc Ecko. The Red by Marc Ecko womens line featured High School
Musical stars Ashley Tisdale and Vanessa Hudgens in print and television campaigns through 2008,
while the Zoo York campaign featured skateboarders Donny Barley and Kevin Shetler. Actress Eva
Longoria appeared in the Bebe Sport footwear campaign in 2008.
Since we introduced our first line, Skechers USA Sport Utility Footwear, in December 1992, we
have expanded our product offering and grown our net sales while substantially increasing the
breadth and penetration of our account base. Our mens, womens and childrens Skechers-branded
product lines benefit from the Skechers reputation for contemporary and progressive styling,
quality, comfort and affordability. Our lines that are not branded with the Skechers name benefit
from our marketing support, quality management and expertise. To promote innovation and brand
relevance, we manage our product lines separately by utilizing dedicated sales and design teams.
Our product lines share back office services in order to limit our operating expenses and fully
utilize our managements vast experience in the footwear industry.
SKECHERS LINES
Skechers USA. Our Skechers USA category for men and women includes: (i) Casuals, (ii) Dress
Casuals, (iii) Relaxed Fit (for men only), (iv) Seriously Lightweight (for men only) (v) Sandals
and (vi) Casual Fusion. This category is generally sold through mid-tier retailers, department
stores and some footwear specialty shops.
|
|
|
The Casuals line for men and women is defined by lugged outsoles and utilizes
value-oriented and leather materials in the uppers. For men, the Casuals category includes
black and brown boots, shoes and sandals that generally have a rugged urban |
2
|
|
|
design some with industrial-inspired fashion features. For women, the Casuals category
includes basic black and brown oxfords and slip-ons, lug outsole boots, and casual sandals.
We design and price both the mens and womens categories to appeal primarily to younger
consumers with broad acceptance across age groups. |
|
|
|
|
The Dress Casuals category for men is comprised of basic black and brown mens shoes
that feature shiny leathers and dress details, but may utilize traditional or lugged
outsoles as well as value-oriented materials. The Dress Casual line for women is comprised
of trend-influenced stylized boots and shoes, which may include leather uppers, shearling or
faux fur lining or trim. |
|
|
|
|
Skechers Relaxed Fit is a line of trend-right casuals for men who want all-day comfort
without compromising style. Characteristics of the line include comfortable outsoles,
cushioned insoles and quality leather uppers. A category with unique features, we market and
package the Skechers Relaxed Fit styles in a shoe box that is distinct from that of other
categories in the Skechers USA line of footwear. |
|
|
|
|
Our Seriously Lightweight styles for men primarily consist of designs similar to our
casual looks, but feature ultra lightweight outsoles, making them ideal travel and work
shoes. A category with unique features, we market and package the Skechers Seriously
Lightweight styles in a shoe box that is distinct from that of other categories in the
Skechers USA line of footwear. |
|
|
|
|
Our Sandals collection for men and women is designed with many of our existing and proven
outsoles for our Casuals, Dress Casuals and Casual Fusion lines, stylized with basic or core
uppers as well as fresh looks. These styles are generally made with quality leather uppers,
but may also be in canvas or fabric. |
|
|
|
|
Our Casual Fusion line is comprised of low-profile, sport-influenced Euro casuals
targeted to trend-conscious young men and women. The outsoles are primarily rubber and
adopted from our mens Sport and womens Active lines. This collection features leather or
nubuck uppers, but may also include mesh. |
Skechers Sport. Our Skechers Sport footwear for men and women includes: (i) Joggers, Trail
Runners, Sport Hikers, Terrainers, (ii) Performance (for men only), (iii) Skechers DLites (for
women only), and (iv) Sport Sandals. Our Skechers Sport category is distinguished by its technical
performance-inspired looks; however, we generally do not promote the technical performance features
of these shoes. Skechers Sport is typically sold through specialty shoe stores, department stores
and athletic footwear retailers.
|
|
|
Our Jogger, Trail Runner, Sport Hiker and cross trainer-inspired Terrainer designs are
lightweight constructions that include cushioned heels, polyurethane midsoles, phylon and
other synthetic outsoles, as well as leather or synthetic uppers such as durabuck, cordura
and nylon mesh. Careful attention is devoted to the design, pattern and construction of the
outsoles, which vary greatly depending on the intended use. This category features earth
tones and athletic-inspired hues with contrasting pop colors such as lime green, orange and
red in addition to traditional athletic white. |
|
|
|
|
The Performance category is comprised of multi-purpose running shoes that are marketed as
mens lifestyle athletic footwear. Some styles include 3M reflective accents, breathable
upper construction, quality leathers, abrasion-resistant toe and heel cap, removable
moisture wicking molded ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA) sock liner, outsole forefoot flex
grooves for improved flexibility, non-marking rubber lugs with impact dispersment technology
(IDT), aggressive all terrain traction lugs, external torsion stabilizer and tuned
dual-density molded EVA midsole with pronation control. |
|
|
|
|
Skechers DLites are ultra lightweight womens sneakers that feature sturdy, sculpted
midsoles for all-day comfort, durable rubber treads for improved traction and a sole design
that provides superior flexibility and cushioning. The uppers are designed in leather,
suede, nubuck and mesh. A category with unique features, we market and package Skechers
DLites in a shoe box that is distinct from that of other categories in the Skechers Sport
line of footwear. |
|
|
|
|
Our Sport Sandals are primarily designed from existing Skechers Sport outsoles and may
include many of the same sport features as our sneakers with the addition of new
technologies geared toward making a comfortable sport sandal. Sport sandals are designed as
seasonal footwear for the consumer who already wears our Skechers Sport sneakers. |
Skechers Active. A natural companion to Skechers Sport, Skechers Active has grown from a
casual everyday line into a complete line of fusion and sport fusion sneakers for females of all
ages. Marked by low-profile outsoles, the Active line is available in a multitude of colors as well
as solid white or black, in fabrics, leathers and meshes, and with various closures traditional
laces, zig-zag and cross straps, among others. The line also now includes Mary Janes, sandals and
open back styles. Active sneakers are typically retailed through specialty casual shoe stores and
department stores.
3
Skechers Cali. Our Skechers Cali is a line of sneakers, skimmers, wedges and sandals for young
women designed to typify the California lifestyle. The uppers are primarily in canvas, fabrics and
leather with unique prints, some with patch details. The sandals range from dress casual looks to
casual to beach thongs. Skechers Cali is sold through specialty casual shoe stores and department
stores.
Skechers Work. Expanding on our heritage of cutting-edge utility footwear, Skechers Work
offers a complete line of mens and womens casuals, field boots, hikers and athletic shoes. The
Skechers Work line includes athletic-inspired, casual safety toe, and non-slip safety toe
categories that may feature lightweight aluminum safety toe, electrical hazard, and slip-resistant
technologies, as well as breathable, seam-sealed waterproof membranes. Designed for men and women
with jobs that require certain safety requirements, these durable styles are constructed on
high-abrasion, long wearing soles, and feature breathable lining, oil and abrasion resistant
outsoles offering all-day comfort and prolonged durability. The uppers are comprised of
high-quality leather, nubuck, trubuck and durabuck. Our safety toe athletic sneakers, boots,
hikers, and casuals are ideal for environments requiring safety footwear and offer comfort and
safety in dry or wet conditions. Our slip-resistant boots, hikers, athletics, casuals and clogs
are ideal for the service industry. Our safety toe products have been independently tested and
certified to meet ASTM standards, and our slip-resistant soles have been tested pursuant to the
Mark II testing method for slip resistance. Skechers Work is typically sold through department
stores, athletic footwear retailers and specialty shoe stores, as well as marketed directly to
consumers through business-to-business channels.
Skechers Kids. The Skechers Kids line includes: (i) Skechers Kids, which is a range of
infants, toddlers, boys and girls boots, shoes and sneakers; (ii) S-Lights and Hot Lights by
Skechers; (iii) Skechers Cali for Girls, which is trend-inspired boots, shoes, sandals and dress
sneakers; (iv) Airators by Skechers; (v) Skechers Super Z-Strap; (vi) Skechers Bungees; (vii) HyDee
HyTop from Skechers; and (viii) Babiez by Skechers. Skechers Kids and Skechers Cali for Girls are
comprised primarily of shoes that are designed as takedowns of their adult counterparts, allowing
the younger set the opportunity to wear the same popular styles as their older siblings and
schoolmates. This takedown strategy maintains the products integrity by offering premium
leathers, hardware and outsoles without the attendant costs involved in designing and developing
new products. In addition, we adapt current fashions from our mens and womens lines by modifying
designs and choosing colors and materials that are more suitable for the playful image that we have
established in the childrens footwear market. Each Skechers Kids line is marketed and packaged
separately with a distinct shoe box. Skechers Kids shoes are available at department stores and
specialty and athletic retailers.
|
|
|
The Skechers Kids line includes embellishments or adornments such as fresh colors and
fabrics from our Skechers adult shoes. Some of these styles are also adapted for toddlers
with softer, more pliable outsoles and for infants with soft, leather-sole crib shoes. |
|
|
|
|
S-Lights and Hot Lights by Skechers are lighted sneakers and sandals for boys and girls.
The S-Lights combine patterns of lights on the outsoles and sides of the shoes while Hot
Lights feature lights on the front of the toe to simulate headlights as well as on other
areas of the shoes. We market and package each of these lines in unique shoe boxes that are
distinct from that of other categories in the Skechers Kids line of footwear. |
|
|
|
|
Skechers Cali for Girls is a line of sneakers, skimmers and sandals for young women
designed to typify the California lifestyle. The sneakers are designed primarily with canvas
uppers in unique prints, some with patch details, on vulcanized outsoles. The skimmers and
flats are designed with many of the same upper materials and outsoles as the sneakers. |
|
|
|
|
Airators by Skechers is a line of boys sneakers with a foot-cooling system designed to
pump air from the heel through to the toes. The line is marketed with the character Kewl
Breeze. |
|
|
|
|
Skechers Super Z-Strap is a line of athletic styled sneakers with a unique z shaped
closure system for easy closure. The line is marketed with the character Z-Strap. |
|
|
|
|
Skechers Bungees is a line of girls sneakers with bungee closures. The line is marketed
with the character Elastika. |
|
|
|
|
HyDee HyTop from Skechers is a line of colorful high-top sneakers for young girls. The
line is marketed with the character HyDee HyTop. |
4
|
|
|
Babiez by Skechers is a line of crib shoes for infants. The uppers and outsoles are
designed in leather and are extremely flexible for newborn feet. |
FASHION AND STREET BRANDS
The Fashion and Street Division and its brands are marketed and packaged separately from Skechers.
Unltd. by Marc Ecko and Red by Marc Ecko. Unltd. by Marc Ecko is a line of mens
street-inspired traditional sneakers, fusion sneakers and urban-focused casuals. Red by Marc Ecko
is a line of womens classic and fashion-forward fusion sneakers, sandals and Mary Janes for young
women. Targeted to the street-savvy 18 to 34 year-old consumer, the footwear reflects Ecko Unltd.s
mens apparel and the Ecko Red womens apparel, and effectively utilizes the globally recognized
Rhino logo on the majority of sneakers and casuals. The mens and womens footwear collections are
designed in leather, canvas, mesh, as well as other materials. Unltd. by Marc Ecko for boys and
Rhino Red for girls sneaker lines primarily consist of takedowns from the adult Marc Ecko footwear
lines with additional or different colorways geared toward children and that reflect the boys and
girls Ecko Unltd. and Ecko Red clothing. The licensed brands are sold through select department
stores and specialty retailers.
Zoo York. Zoo York footwear is a line of action sports and lifestyle footwear for men, women
and boys. The Zoo York footwear follows the color palette and trends of Zoo York apparel and
targets skateboarders and those that embrace skate fashion. The licensed brand is available in
skate and specialty shops as well as select athletic and department stores.
310 Premium Footwear. The 310 Premium Footwear collection for men utilizes top-quality
leathers, a fashion-forward approach to design and comfort, and materials that are derived from 310
Motorings customized cars, including wood burl and carbon fiber. The line consists of high-design
boots, shoes, and stylized athletics. 310 Premium Footwear is available in select department
stores, specialty retailers and urban independents.
Mark Nason and Siren by Mark Nason. Mark Nason is a sophisticated and fashion forward footwear
collection, marketed to style-conscious men, designed to complement designer denim and dress casual
wear. Primarily crafted and constructed in Italy, the Mark Nason collection is comprised of classic
and modern boots, shoes and sandals with distinctive profiles and luxurious hand-distressed
leathers. The Mark Nason line distinguishes itself with high quality individual styling and may
utilize unique materials such as premium leathers, etched and tattooed leathers, hand-treated,
hand-scraped and hand-cut leathers, hand-treated leather uppers and soles, snakeskin and eel skin.
Siren by Mark Nason is the ultimate accompaniment to designer denim and casual couture for
discerning women. The lines boots are fueled with bold profiles, alluring details and distinct
textures. Handcrafted in Italy, the boots utilize premium leathers, hand-treated details, leather
outsoles, and some may include snakeskin and other exotic materials. The Mark Nason lines are
available in better department stores and boutiques.
Bebe Sport. Skechers acquired the footwear license for Bebe Sport footwear in 2008.
Embracing the style and design of the Bebe Sport apparel, the sneaker and sandal line features such
details as rhinestones, satin laces, and patent leather. The footwear is designed for women 18 to
34. The licensed brand is available at department stores and specialty boutiques.
Punkrose and Public Royalty. Skechers acquired the junior brands Punkrose and Public Royalty
in 2008. Punkrose for women and Public Royalty for men are cutting-edge street ready footwear.
Inspired by music, art, fashion, and action sports, the Public Royalty collection consists of
high-top and low-top sneakers, slip-ons and boots. Punkrose styles include sneakers, high-tops,
skimmers, boots and sandals. Vibrant color combos and get-noticed prints are a trademark of this
brand. Both brands are available at department stores, sneaker shops and specialty boutiques.
PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
Our principal goal in product design is to generate new and exciting footwear in all of our
product lines with contemporary and progressive styles and comfort-enhancing performance features.
Targeted to the active, youthful and style-savvy, we design most new styles to be fashionable and
marketable to the 12 to 24 year-old consumer, while substantially all of our lines appeal to the
broader range of 5 to 40 year-old consumers, with an exclusive selection for infants and toddlers.
While some of our shoes have performance features, we generally do not position our shoes in the
marketplace as technical performance shoes.
We believe that our products success is related to our ability to recognize trends in the
footwear markets and to design products that anticipate and accommodate consumers ever-evolving
preferences. We are able to quickly translate the latest fashion trends into stylish, quality
footwear at a reasonable price by analyzing and interpreting current and emerging lifestyle trends.
Lifestyle trend
5
information is compiled and analyzed by our designers from various sources, including the
review and analysis of modern music, television, cinema, clothing, alternative sports and other
trend-setting media; traveling to domestic and international fashion markets to identify and
confirm current trends; consulting with our retail and e-commerce customers for information on
current retail selling trends; participating in major footwear trade shows to stay abreast of
popular brands, fashions and styles; and subscribing to various fashion and color information
services. In addition, a key component of our design philosophy is to continually reinterpret and
develop our successful styles in our brands image.
The footwear design process typically begins about nine months before the start of a season.
Our products are designed and developed primarily by our in-house design staff. To promote
innovation and brand relevance, we utilize dedicated design teams, who report to our senior design
executives and focus on each of the mens, womens and childrens categories. In addition, we
utilize outside design firms on an item-specific basis to supplement our internal design efforts.
The design process is extremely collaborative, as members of the design staff frequently meet with
the heads of retail, merchandising, sales, production and sourcing to further refine our products
to meet the particular needs of the target market.
After a design team arrives at a consensus regarding the fashion themes for the coming season,
the designers then translate these themes into our products. These interpretations include
variations in product color, material structure and embellishments, which are arrived at after
close consultation with our production department. Prototype blueprints and specifications are
created and forwarded to our manufacturers for a design prototype. The design prototypes are then
sent back to our design teams. Our major retail customers may also review these new design
concepts. Customer input not only allows us to measure consumer reaction to the latest designs, but
also affords us an opportunity to foster deeper and more collaborative relationships with our
customers. We also occasionally order limited production runs that may initially be tested in our
concept stores. By working closely with store personnel, we obtain customer feedback that often
influences product design and development. Our design teams can easily and quickly modify and
refine a design based on customer input. Generally, the production process can take six months to
nine months from design concept to commercialization.
SOURCING
Factories. Our products are produced by independent contract manufacturers located primarily
in China and, to a lesser extent, in Italy, Vietnam, Brazil and various other countries. We do not
own or operate any manufacturing facilities as we believe that the use of independent manufacturers
substantially increases our production flexibility and capacity while reducing capital expenditures
and avoiding the costs of managing a large production work force.
When possible, we seek to use manufacturers that have previously produced our footwear, which
we believe enhances continuity and quality while controlling production costs. We attempt to
monitor our selection of independent factories to ensure that no one manufacturer is responsible
for a disproportionate amount of our merchandise. We source product for styles that account for a
significant percentage of our net sales from at least four different manufacturers. During 2008,
four of our contract manufacturers accounted for approximately 58.2% of total purchases. One
manufacturer accounted for 30.6%, and one other accounted for over 10.0% of our total purchases. To
date, we have not experienced difficulty in obtaining manufacturing services.
We finance our production activities in part through the use of interest-bearing open purchase
arrangements with certain of our Asian manufacturers. These facilities currently bear interest at a
rate between 0% and 1.5% for 30 to 60 days financing, depending on the factory. We believe that the
use of these arrangements afford us additional liquidity and flexibility. We do not have any
long-term contracts with any of our manufacturers; however, we have long-standing relationships
with many of our manufacturers and believe our relationships to be good.
We closely monitor sales activity after initial introduction of a product in our concept
stores to determine whether there is substantial demand for a style, thereby aiding us in our
sourcing decisions. Styles that have substantial consumer appeal are highlighted in upcoming
collections or offered as part of our periodic style offerings, while less popular styles can be
discontinued after only a limited production run. We believe that sales in our concept stores can
also help forecast sales in national retail stores, and we share this sales information with our
wholesale customers. Sales, merchandising, production and allocations management analyze historical
and current sales and market data from our wholesale account base and our own retail stores to
develop an internal product quantity forecast that allows us to better manage our future production
and inventory levels. For those styles with high sell-through percentages, we maintain an in-stock
position to minimize the time necessary to fill customer orders by placing orders with our
manufacturers prior to the time we receive customers orders for such footwear.
6
Production Oversight. To safeguard product quality and consistency, we oversee the key aspects
of production from initial prototype manufacture through initial production runs to final
manufacture. Monitoring of all production is performed in the United States by our in-house
production department and in Asia through an approximately 200-person staff working from our
offices in China. We believe that our Asian presence allows us to negotiate supplier and
manufacturer arrangements more effectively, decrease product turnaround time and ensure timely
delivery of finished footwear. In addition, we require our manufacturers to certify that neither
convicted, forced nor indentured labor (as defined under U.S. law) nor child labor (as defined by
law in the manufacturers country) is used in the production process, and that compensation will be
paid according to local law and that the factory is in compliance with local safety regulations.
Quality Control. We believe that quality control is an important and effective means of
maintaining the quality and reputation of our products. Our quality control program is designed to
ensure that not only finished goods meet our established design specifications, but also that all
goods bearing our trademarks meet our standards for quality. Our quality control personnel located
in China perform an array of inspection procedures at various stages of the production process,
including examination and testing of prototypes of key raw materials prior to manufacture, samples
and materials at various stages of production and final products prior to shipment. Our employees
are on-site at each of our major manufacturers to oversee production. For some of our lower volume
manufacturers, our staff is on-site during significant production runs or we will perform
unannounced visits to their manufacturing sites to further monitor compliance with our
manufacturing specifications.
ADVERTISING AND MARKETING
With a marketing philosophy of Unseen, Untold, Unsold, we take a targeted approach to
marketing to drive traffic, build brand recognition and properly position our diverse lines within
the marketplace. Senior management is directly involved in shaping our image and the conception,
development and implementation of our advertising and marketing activities. The focus of our
marketing plan is print and television advertising, which is supported by outdoor, trend-influenced
marketing, public relations, promotions and in-store support. In addition, we utilize celebrity
endorsers in our advertisements. We also believe our websites and trade shows are effective
marketing tools to both consumers and corporate accounts. We have historically budgeted advertising
as a percentage of projected net sales.
The majority of our advertising is conceptualized by our in-house design team. We believe that
our advertising strategies, methods and creative campaigns are directly related to our success.
Through our lifestyle and image-driven advertising, we generally seek to build and increase brand
awareness by linking the Skechers brand and our fashion and street brands to youthful, contemporary
lifestyles and attitudes. We have built on this approach by featuring select styles in our
lifestyle ads. In addition to our compelling Skechers lifestyle ads, we have also created product
specific ads for our mens lines to appeal to men as well as women who purchase footwear for men.
Our ads are designed to provide merchandise flexibility and to facilitate the brands and product
designs direction of evolving footwear fashions and consumer preferences.
To further build brand awareness and influence consumer spending, we have selectively signed
endorsement agreements with celebrities whom we believe would reach new markets. In 2008, we signed
American Idol winner David Cook to appear in Skechers marketing campaigns through 2009. In past
years, we had similar endorsement agreements for Skechers with singers Ashlee Simpson, Carrie
Underwood, Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears, professional basketball player and actor Rick
Fox, and actors Robert Downey, Jr., Matt Dillon and Rob Lowe. From time to time, we may sign other
celebrities to endorse our brand name and image in order to strategically market our products among
specific consumer groups in the future.
In addition to advertising our Skechers branded lines through mens, womens and childrens
ads, we also support Mark Nason, 310 Premium Footwear, Marc Ecko, Zoo York, Punkrose and Bebe Sport
lines through individual unique print and/or television advertisements some of which may include
celebrity endorsees. For Mark Nason, we have focused on key-selling styles in product-driven ads
that captured the brands essence. For the Marc Ecko footwear brands, Marc Eckos design team has
created relevant targeted print and television commercials for men and women. These include a
multi-media mens campaign featuring our graffiti painted shoe as well commercials for Unltd. by
Marc Ecko for boys. During 2008, High School Musical stars Ashley Tisdale and Vanessa Hudgens were
the faces of Red by Marc Ecko, appearing in print, outdoor and television advertisements. Vanessa
Hudgens will continue through 2009. For Punkrose, the approach has been lifestyle advertisements
that embrace the feeling of the footwear. During 2008, Bebe Sport was supported by actress Eva
Longoria who appeared in the print advertisements.
With a targeted approach, our print ads appear regularly in popular fashion and lifestyle
consumer publications, such as GQ, Cosmopolitan, Elle, Lucky, In Style, Seventeen, Maxim, Mens
Fitness, and Complex, as well as in weekly publications such as People,
7
Us Weekly, Star, Sports Illustrated and InTouch, among others. Our advertisements also appear
in international magazines around the world.
Our television commercials are produced both in-house and through producers that we have
utilized in the past and who are familiar with our brands. In 2008, we developed commercials for
men, women and children for our Skechers brands, including our animated spots for kids featuring
our own action heroes. We have found these to be a cost-effective way to advertise during key
national and cable programming in high selling seasons. In 2008, for the first time, we translated
our commercials into multiple languages and aired the spots in Brazil, Canada, United Kingdom,
France, the Benelux Region, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria and Switzerland.
Outdoor. In an effort to reach consumers where they shop and in high-traffic areas as they
travel to and from work, we continued our multi-level outdoor campaign that included kiosks in key
malls across the United States and billboards, transportation systems and telephone kiosks in North
America and Europe. We believe these are effective and efficient ways to reach a broad range of
consumers and leave a lasting impression for our brands.
Trend-Influenced Marketing/Public Relations. Our public relations objectives are to secure
product placement in key fashion magazines, place our footwear on the feet of trend-setting
celebrities, and gain positive and accurate press on our company. Through our commitment to
aggressively promote our upcoming styles, our products are often featured in leading fashion and
pop culture magazines, as well as in select films and popular television shows. Our footwear and
our company have been prominently displayed and referenced on news and magazine shows
including Oprah, Extra, Laura Ingraham on Fox News and E!; and on television programs,
including Burn Notice, The Hills, The Bachelorette, and Americas Next Top Model, among others.
We have also amassed an array of prominent product placements in magazines including Lucky,
Seventeen, OK!, US Weekly, Mens Fitness, Slam, Dime and Footwear News. In addition, our brands have
been associated with cutting edge events and select celebrities, and our product has been seen worn
by trend-setters like Denis Leary, Vin Diesel, Forest Whitaker and Vanessa Hudgens.
Promotions. By applying creative sales techniques via a broad spectrum of media, our marketing
team seeks to build brand recognition and drive traffic to Skechers retail stores, websites and
our retail partners locations. Skechers promotional strategies have encompassed in-store
specials, charity events, product tie-ins and giveaways, and collaborations with national retailers
and radio stations. Our imaginative promotions are consistent with Skechers imaging and lifestyle.
Visual Merchandising. Our in-house visual merchandising department supports wholesale
customers, distributors and our retail stores by developing displays that effectively leverage our
products at the point of sale. Our point-of-purchase display items include signage, graphics,
displays, counter cards, banners and other merchandising items for each of our brands. These
materials mirror the look and feel of each brand and reinforce the image as well as draw consumers
into stores.
Our visual merchandising coordinators (VMCs) work with our sales force and directly with
our customers to ensure better sell-through at the retail level by generating greater consumer
awareness through Skechers brand displays. Our VMCs communicate with and visit our wholesale
customers on a regular basis to aid in proper display of our merchandise. They also run in-store
promotions to enhance the sale of Skechers footwear and create excitement surrounding the Skechers
brand. We believe that these efforts help stimulate impulse sales and repeat purchases.
Trade Shows. To better showcase our diverse products to footwear buyers in the United States
and Europe and to distributors around the world, we regularly exhibit at leading trade shows. Along
with specialty trade shows, we exhibit at WSAs The Shoe Show, FFANY, ASR and MAGIC in the United
States; GDS, MICAM, Bread & Butter, MODA, Mess Around and Whos Next in Europe; and Couromoda in
Brazil. Our dynamic, state-of-the-art trade show exhibits are developed by our in-house architect
to showcase our latest product offerings in a lifestyle setting reflective of each of our brands.
By investing in innovative displays and individual rooms showcasing each line, our sales force can
present a sales plan for each line and buyers are able to truly understand the breadth and depth of
our offerings, thereby optimizing commitments and sales at the retail level.
Internet.
We also promote our brands through our e-commerce websites
www.skechers.com and
www.soholab.com. We have also established a unique Internet website for Mark Nason
(www.marknason.com) designed to serve primarily as a marketing tool. These websites currently
enable us to present information on our products, provide a brand experience and store locations to
consumers, and allow consumers the ability to directly order products on the Internet. These sites
also provide us a mechanism for customer feedback as well as allowing us to receive and respond
directly to consumer feedback. Our websites are intended to enhance the Skechers and fashion
brands, and to increase sales through all our retail channels. Our websites also allow us to
leverage our brand awareness at a lower cost than traditional distribution channels.
8
PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS
We have four reportable segments domestic wholesale sales, international wholesale sales,
retail sales and e-commerce sales. In the United States, our products are available through a
network of wholesale customers comprised of department, athletic and specialty stores.
Internationally, our products are available through wholesale customers in more than 100 countries
and territories via our global network of distributors and our subsidiaries in Asia, Europe, Canada
and Brazil. Skechers owns and operates retail stores both domestically and internationally through
three integrated retail formatsconcept, factory outlet and warehouse outlet stores. Each of these
channels serves an integral function in the global distribution of our products. Fifteen
distributors have opened 94 distributor-owned Skechers retail stores in 25 countries as of December
31, 2008.
Domestic Wholesale. We distribute our footwear through the following domestic wholesale
distribution channels: department stores, specialty stores, athletic shoe stores and independent
retailers, as well as catalog and Internet retailers. While department stores and specialty
retailers are the largest distribution channels, we believe that we appeal to a variety of
wholesale customers, many of whom may operate stores within the same retail location due to our
distinct product lines, variety of styles and the price criteria of their specific customers.
Management has a clearly defined growth strategy for each of our channels of distribution. An
integral component of our strategy is to offer our accounts the highest level of customer service
so that our products will be fully represented in existing retail locations and new locations of
each customer.
In an effort to provide knowledgeable and personalized service to our wholesale customers, the
sales force is segregated by product line, each of which is headed by a vice president or national
sales manager. Reporting to each sales manager are knowledgeable account executives and territory
managers. Our vice presidents and national sales managers report to a senior vice president of
sales. All of our vice presidents and national sales managers are compensated on a salary basis,
while our account executives and territory managers are compensated on a commission basis. None of
our domestic sales personnel sells competing products.
We believe that we have developed a loyal customer base through exceptional customer service.
We believe that our close relationships with these accounts help us to maximize their retail
sell-throughs. Our visual merchandise coordinators work with our wholesale customers to ensure that
our merchandise and point-of-purchase marketing materials are properly presented. Sales executives
and merchandise personnel work closely with accounts to ensure that appropriate styles are
purchased for specific accounts and for specific stores within those accounts as well as to ensure
that appropriate inventory levels are carried at each store. Such information is then utilized to
help develop sales projections and determine the product needs of our wholesale customers. The
value-added services we provide our wholesale customers help us maintain strong relationships with
our existing wholesale customers and attract potential new wholesale customers.
International Wholesale. Our products are sold in more than 100 countries and territories
throughout the world. We generate revenues from outside the United States from three principal
sources: (i) direct sales to department stores and specialty retail stores through our subsidiaries
in Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Malaysia, Thailand, the
Benelux Region, the United Kingdom and Brazil; (ii) sales to foreign distributors who distribute
our footwear to department stores and specialty retail stores in countries and territories across
Eastern Europe, Asia, Latin America, South America, Africa, the Middle East and Australia, among
other regions; and (iii) to a lesser extent, royalties from licensees who manufacture and
distribute our non-footwear products outside the United States.
We believe that international distribution of our products represents a significant
opportunity to increase sales and profits. We intend to further increase our share of the
international footwear market by heightening our marketing in those countries in which we currently
have a presence through our international advertising campaigns, which are designed to establish
Skechers as a global brand synonymous with trend-right casual shoes.
|
|
|
International Subsidiaries |
Europe
We currently distribute product in most of Western Europe through the following
subsidiaries: Skechers USA Ltd., with its offices and showrooms in London, England; Skechers
S.a.r.l., with its offices and showrooms in Lausanne, Switzerland; Skechers USA France
S.A.S., with its offices and showrooms in Paris, France; Skechers USA Deutschland GmbH, with
its offices and showrooms in Dietzenbach, Germany; Skechers USA Iberia, S.L., with its
offices and showrooms in Madrid,
9
Spain; Skechers USA Benelux B.V., with its offices and showrooms in Waalwijk, the
Netherlands; and Skechers USA Italia S.r.l., with its offices and showroom in Verona, Italy.
Skechers-owned retail stores in Europe include eight concept stores and two factory
outlet stores located in six countries, including the key locations of Oxford Street in
London, Alstadt District in Düsseldorf and Kalverstraat Street in Amsterdam.
To accommodate our European subsidiaries operations, we operate an approximately
240,000 square foot distribution center in Liege, Belgium. This distribution center is
currently used to store and deliver product to our subsidiaries and retail stores throughout
Europe. During 2008, we entered into a lease to add an additional 250,000 square foot
distribution facility adjacent to our existing facility which we expect to occupy in 2009.
Canada
Merchandising and marketing of our product in Canada is managed by our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Skechers USA Canada, Inc. with its offices and showrooms outside Toronto in
Mississauga, Ontario. Product sold in Canada is primarily sourced from our U.S. distribution
center in Ontario, California. We have two concept stores, Torontos Eaton Centre and West
Edmonton Mall, and one factory outlet store in Toronto.
Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand
Merchandising and marketing of our product in Malaysia and Thailand is managed by two of
our subsidiaries, Skechers Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. and Skechers (Thailand) Limited with their
respective offices in Kuala Lumpur and Bangkok. Product sold in these countries is primarily
sourced from a third party distribution center in Selangor, Malaysia. We have six concept
stores in Malaysia and Thailand: three in Kuala Lumpur, two in Selangor, and one in Bangkok.
We also established a subsidiary in Singapore, Skechers Singapore Pte. Ltd. We entered into
an agreement in November 2008 to contribute certain assets and shares of stock of these
subsidiaries to Skechers Southeast Asia Limited, a joint venture in which we have a 50%
interest.
Brazil
Merchandising and marketing of our product in Brazil is managed by our wholly-owned
subsidiary, Skechers Do Brasil Calcados LTDA., with its offices located in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Product sold in Brazil is primarily shipped directly from our contract manufacturers
factories in China and occasionally from our U.S. distribution center in Ontario, California.
China and Hong Kong
We have a 50% interest in a joint venture in China and a minority interest in a joint
venture in Hong Kong that generate net sales in those countries. Under the joint venture
agreements, the joint venture partners contribute capital in proportion to their respective
ownership interests. The joint ventures operate 15 direct-owned stores and in excess of 90
shops-in-shop in China and 6 direct-owned stores and 11 shops-in-shop in Hong Kong. The
joint ventures are included in our 2008 consolidated financial statements.
Outside of Western Europe and Canada, our footwear is distributed through an extensive
network of more than 30 distributors who sell our products to department, athletic and
specialty stores in more than 100 countries around the world. Through agreements with 15 of
these distributors, 94 distributor-owned Skechers retail stores are open in 25 countries,
including 37 stores that were opened in 2008, while three distributor-owned stores were
closed.
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STORE |
|
NUMBER OF |
|
|
REGION |
|
FORMAT |
|
STORES |
|
LOCATION (1) |
Asia
|
|
Concept
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Japan (2); Korea (10); Philippines (2); Taiwan (2) |
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Japan (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
Concept
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Melbourne, Sydney |
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Cairns, Canberra, Melbourne, Perth, Sydney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central America/ South America
|
|
Concept
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Chile (10); Columbia (9); Ecuador (2); Guatemala (2); Panama (2); Peru (3); Venezuela (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Europe
|
|
Concept
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Czech Republic; Russia (7); Turkey; Ukraine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Europe
|
|
Concept
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Denmark; Estonia (2); Finland; Lithuania (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle East
|
|
Concept
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Bahrain (2); Kuwait (2); Saudi Arabia; UAE (5) |
|
|
Warehouse
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
UAE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Africa
|
|
Concept
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Sandton |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
One store per location except as otherwise noted. |
The distributors are responsible for their respective stores operations, have ownership
of their respective stores assets, and select the broad collection of our products to sell
to consumers in their regions. In order to maintain a globally consistent image, we provide
architectural, graphic and visual guidance and materials for the design of the stores, and we
train the local staff on our products and corporate culture. We intend to expand our
international presence and global recognition of the Skechers brand name by continuing to
sell our footwear to foreign distributors and by opening flagship retail stores with
distributors that have local market expertise.
Retail Stores. We pursue our retail store strategy through our three integrated retail
formats: the concept store, the factory outlet store and the warehouse outlet store. Our three
store formats enable us to promote the full Skechers product offering in an attractive environment
that appeals to a broad group of consumers. In addition, most of our retail stores are profitable
and have a positive effect on our operating results. As of February 15, 2009, we owned and operated
84 concept stores, 83 factory outlet stores and 37 warehouse outlet stores in the United States,
and 16 concept stores and three factory outlet stores internationally. We closed two stores and
opened 34 new stores in 2008. We plan to open an additional 15 to 18 domestic stores and two
international stores by the end of 2009.
Our concept stores are located at either marquee street locations or in major shopping
malls in large metropolitan cities. Our concept stores have a threefold purpose in our
operating strategy. First, concept stores serve as a showcase for a wide range of our product
offering for the current season as we estimate that our average wholesale customer carries no
more than 5% of the complete Skechers line in any one location. Our concept stores showcase
our products in a cutting-edge, open-floor setting, providing the customer with the complete
Skechers story. Second, retail locations are generally chosen to generate maximum marketing
value for the Skechers brand name through signage, store front presentation and interior
design. Domestic locations include concept stores at Times Square and 34th Street in New
York, Powell Street in San Francisco, Hollywood and Highland in Hollywood, Santa Monicas
Third Street Promenade, Dallas Northpark Center, Las Vegas Fashion Show Mall, Seattles
Bellevue Square Mall, and Woodfield Mall outside Chicago. International locations include
Oxford Street in London, Alstadt District in Dusseldorf, Torontos Eaton Centre, and
Kalverstraat Street in Amsterdam. The stores are typically designed to create a distinctive
Skechers look and feel, and enhance customer association of the Skechers brand name with
current youthful lifestyle trends and styles. Third, the concept stores serve as marketing
and product testing venues. We believe that product sell-through information and rapid
customer feedback derived from our concept stores enables our design, sales, merchandising
and production staff to respond to market changes and new product introductions. Such
responses serve to augment sales and limit our inventory markdowns and customer returns and
allowances. We opened 19 domestic concept stores and three international concept stores, and
we closed two domestic concept stores in 2008.
The typical Skechers concept store is approximately 2,500 square feet, although in
certain markets we have opened concept stores as large as 7,800 square feet or as small as
1,500 square feet. When deciding where to open concept stores, we
11
identify top geographic
markets in the larger metropolitan cities in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. When
selecting a specific site, we evaluate the proposed sites traffic pattern, co-tenancies,
sales volume of neighboring concept stores, lease economics and other factors considered
important within the specific location. If we are considering opening a concept store in a
shopping mall, our strategy is to obtain space as centrally located as possible in the mall
where we expect foot traffic to be most concentrated. We believe that the strength of the
Skechers brand name has enabled us to negotiate more favorable terms with shopping malls that
want us to open up concept stores to attract customer traffic to their venues.
Our factory outlet stores are generally located in manufacturers direct outlet centers
throughout the United States. In addition, we have three international outlet stores one
in Canada, one in England, and one in Scotland. Our factory outlet stores provide
opportunities for us to sell discontinued and excess merchandise, thereby reducing the need
to sell such merchandise to discounters at excessively low prices and potentially compromise
the Skechers brand image. Skechers factory outlet stores range in size from approximately
1,900 to 9,000 square feet. Inventory in these stores is supplemented by certain first-line
styles sold at full retail price points. We opened 10 domestic
factory outlet stores and one international factory outlet store in 2008.
|
|
|
Warehouse Outlet Stores. |
Our free-standing warehouse outlet stores, which are located throughout the United
States, enable us to liquidate excess merchandise, discontinued lines and odd-size inventory
in a cost-efficient manner. Skechers warehouse outlet stores range in size from
approximately 5,200 to 13,500 square feet. Our warehouse outlet stores enable us to sell
discontinued and excess merchandise that would otherwise typically be sold to discounters at
excessively low prices, which could otherwise compromise the Skechers brand image. We seek to
open our warehouse outlet stores in areas that are in close proximity to our concept stores
in order to facilitate the timely transfer of inventory that we want to liquidate as soon as
practicable. We opened two new domestic warehouse outlet stores in 2008.
Electronic
Commerce. Our websites, www.skechers.com and
www.soholab.com are virtual
storefronts that promote the Skechers and Fashion and Street Divisions brands. Our websites are
designed to provide a positive shopping and brand experience, showcasing our products in an
easy-to-navigate format, allowing consumers to browse our selections and purchase our footwear.
These virtual stores have provided a convenient alternative-shopping environment and brand
experience. These websites are an efficient and effective additional retail distribution channel,
and they have improved our customer service.
LICENSING
We believe that selective licensing of the Skechers brand name and our product line names to
manufacturers may broaden and enhance the individual brands without requiring significant capital
investments or additional incremental operating expenses. Our multiple product lines plus
additional subcategories present many potential licensing opportunities on terms with licensees
that we believe will provide more effective manufacturing, distribution or marketing of
non-footwear products. We also believe that the reputation of Skechers and its history in launching
brands has also enabled us to partner with reputable non-footwear brands in order to design and
market their footwear.
As of January 31, 2009, we had 12 active domestic and international licensing agreements in
which we are the licensor. We have international licensing agreements for the design and
distribution of mens and womens active apparel in Israel; mens and womens apparel in select
European countries; bags in select Central and South American countries; watches in the
Philippines; and apparel in Japan and Korea.
Additionally, we have signed agreements to design, develop and market footwear for the street
lifestyle apparel brands Ecko Unltd., Ecko Red, Red by Marc Ecko, and Zoo York under the Marc Ecko
Enterprises umbrella as well as TapouT and Bebe Sport.
DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS
We believe that strong distribution support is a critical factor in our operations. Once
manufactured, our products are packaged in shoe boxes bearing bar codes that are shipped either (i)
to our five distribution centers located in Ontario, California, which measure in aggregate
approximately 1.7 million square-feet; (ii) to our approximately 240,000 square-foot distribution
center located in Liege, Belgium or (iii) directly from third-party manufacturers to our other
international customers and other international third party distribution centers. Upon receipt at
either of the distribution centers, merchandise is inspected and recorded in our management
12
information system and packaged according to customers orders for delivery. Merchandise is shipped
to customers by whatever means each customer requests, which is usually by common carrier. The
distribution centers have multi-access docks, enabling us to receive and ship simultaneously, and
to pack separate trailers for shipments to different customers at the same time. We have an
electronic data interchange system, or EDI system, to which some of our larger customers are
linked. This system allows these customers to automatically place orders with us, thereby
eliminating the time involved in transmitting and inputting orders, and it includes direct billing
and shipping information.
During 2007, we entered into an eleven-year lease to build a new 1.8 million square foot
distribution facility in Moreno Valley, California, which when completed we expect to occupy in
2010. This single facility will replace the existing five facilities located in
Ontario, California, of which four are on short-term leases. In addition during 2008, we
entered into a twenty-year lease to add an additional 250,000 square foot distribution facility
adjacent to our existing facility in Liege, Belgium, which we expect to occupy in 2009.
BACKLOG
As of December 31, 2008, our backlog was $325.3 million, compared to $416.5 million as of
December 31, 2007. Backlog orders are subject to cancellation by customers, as evidenced by the
cancellations that we have recently experienced due to the weakening U.S. economy. For a variety
of reasons, including changes in the economy, customer demand for our products, the timing of
shipments, product mix of customer orders, the amount of in-season orders and a shift towards
tighter lead times within backlog levels, backlog may not be a reliable measure of future sales for
any succeeding period.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
We own and utilize a variety of trademarks, including the Skechers trademark. We have a
significant number of both registrations and pending applications for our trademarks in the United
States. In addition, we have trademark registrations and trademark applications in approximately 94
foreign countries. We also have design patents and pending design and utility patent applications
in both the United States and approximately 27 foreign countries. We continuously look to increase
the number of our patents and trademarks both domestically and internationally where necessary to
protect valuable intellectual property. We regard our trademarks and other intellectual property as
valuable assets and believe that they have significant value in the marketing of our products. We
vigorously protect our trademarks against infringement, including through the use of cease and
desist letters, administrative proceedings and lawsuits.
We rely on trademark, patent, copyright and trade secret protection, non-disclosure agreements
and licensing arrangements to establish, protect and enforce intellectual property rights in our
logos, tradenames and in the design of our products. In particular, we believe that our future
success will largely depend on our ability to maintain and protect the Skechers trademark and other
key trademarks. Despite our efforts to safeguard and maintain our intellectual property rights, we
cannot be certain that we will be successful in this regard. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that
our trademarks, products and promotional materials or other intellectual property rights do not or
will not violate the intellectual property rights of others, that our intellectual property would
be upheld if challenged, or that we would, in such an event, not be prevented from using our
trademarks or other intellectual property rights. Such claims, if proven, could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, although
any such claims may ultimately prove to be without merit, the necessary management attention to and
legal costs associated with litigation or other resolution of future claims concerning trademarks
and other intellectual property rights could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. We have sued and have been sued by third parties for
infringement of intellectual property. It is our opinion that none of these claims has materially
impaired our ability to utilize our intellectual property rights.
The laws of certain foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same
extent or in the same manner as do the laws of the United States. Although we continue to implement
protective measures and intend to defend our intellectual property rights vigorously, these efforts
may not be successful or the costs associated with protecting our rights in certain jurisdictions
may be prohibitive. From time to time we discover products in the marketplace that are counterfeit
reproductions of our products or that otherwise infringe upon intellectual property rights held by
us. Actions taken by us to establish and protect our trademarks and other intellectual property
rights may not be adequate to prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from
seeking to block sales of our products as violating trademarks and intellectual property rights. If
we are unsuccessful in challenging a third partys products on the basis of infringement of our
intellectual property rights, continued sales of such products by that or any other third party
could adversely impact the Skechers brand, result in the shift of consumer preferences away from
our products and generally have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
13
COMPETITION
Competition in the footwear industry is intense. Although we believe that we do not compete
directly with any single company with respect to its entire range of products, our products compete
with other branded products within their product category as well as with private label products
sold by retailers, including some of our customers. Our utility footwear and casual shoes compete
with footwear offered by companies such as The Timberland Company, Dr. Martens, Kenneth Cole
Productions Inc., Steven Madden, Ltd., Wolverine World Wide, Inc., and V.F. Corporation. Our
athletic lifestyle shoes compete with footwear offered by companies such as Nike, Inc., adidas AG,
Puma AG, New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. and K-Swiss Inc. Our childrens shoes compete with
footwear
offered by companies such as Collective Brands Inc. In varying degrees, depending on the
product category involved, we compete on the basis of style, price, quality, comfort and brand name
prestige and recognition, among other considerations. These and other competitors pose challenges
to our market share in our major domestic markets and may make it more difficult to establish our
products in Europe, Asia and other international regions. We also compete with numerous
manufacturers, importers and distributors of footwear for the limited shelf space available for the
display of such products to the consumer. Moreover, the general availability of contract
manufacturing capacity allows ease of access by new market entrants. Many of our competitors are
larger, have been in existence for a longer period of time, have achieved greater recognition for
their brand names, have captured greater market share and/or have substantially greater financial,
distribution, marketing and other resources than we do. We cannot be certain that we will be able
to compete successfully against present or future competitors, or that competitive pressures will
not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
EMPLOYEES
As of February 1, 2009, we employed 4,130 persons, 2,112 of whom were employed on a full-time
basis and 2,018 of whom were employed on a part-time basis. None of our employees is subject to a
collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relations with our employees are satisfactory.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information in this annual report, the following factors should be
considered in evaluating us and our business.
The Effects Of The Recent Global Economic Slowdown May Continue To Have A Negative Impact On Our
Business, Results Of Operations Or Financial Condition.
The recent global economic slowdown has caused disruptions and extreme volatility in global
financial markets, increased rates of default and bankruptcy, and declining consumer and business
confidence, which has led to decreased levels of consumer spending, particularly on discretionary
items such as footwear. These macroeconomic developments have and could continue to negatively
impact our business, which depends on the general economic environment and levels of consumer
spending in the United States and other parts of the world that affect not only the ultimate
consumer, but also retailers, who are our primary direct customers. As a result, we may not be
able to maintain or increase our sales to existing customers, make sales to new customers, open and
operate new retail stores, maintain sales levels at our existing stores, maintain or increase our
international operations on a profitable basis, or maintain or improve our earnings from operations
as a percentage of net sales. If the global economic slowdown continues for a significant period
or continues to worsen, our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows could be
materially adversely affected.
Our Business Could Be Harmed If We Fail To Maintain Proper Inventory Levels.
We place orders with our manufacturers for some of our products prior to the time we receive
all of our customers orders. We do this to minimize purchasing costs, the time necessary to fill
customer orders and the risk of non-delivery. We also maintain an inventory of certain products
that we anticipate will be in greater demand. However, the current global economic slowdown makes
it increasingly difficult of us and our customers to accurately forecast product demand trends, and
we may be unable to sell the products we have ordered in advance from manufacturers or that we have
in our inventory. Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in inventory
write-downs, and the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices could significantly impair our
brand image and have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
Conversely, if we underestimate consumer demand for our products or if our manufacturers fail to
supply the quality products that we require at the time we need them, we may experience
14
inventory
shortages. Inventory shortages might delay shipments to customers, negatively impact retailer and
distributor relationships, and diminish brand loyalty.
Our Business Could Be Adversely Affected By Changes In The Business Or Financial Condition Of
Significant Customers Due To The Current And Future Conditions In The Global Financial Markets.
The current global financial crisis affecting the banking system and financial markets and the
possibility that financial institutions may consolidate or go out of business have resulted in a
tightening in the credit markets, more stringent lending standards and terms, and higher volatility
in fixed income, credit, currency and equity markets. There could be a number of follow-on effects
from the
credit crisis on our business, including insolvency of certain of our key distributors, which
could impair our distribution channels, or our significant customers, including our distributors,
may experience diminished liquidity or an inability to obtain credit to finance purchases of our
product. Our customers may also experience weak demand for our products or other difficulties in
their businesses. If conditions in the global financial markets become more severe or continue
longer than we anticipate, our forecasted demand may not materialize to the levels that we require
to achieve our anticipated financial results. Any of these events would likely harm our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
We May Have Difficulty Managing Our Costs As A Result Of The Recent Global Economic Slowdown.
Our future results of operations will depend on our overall ability to manage our costs.
These challenges include (i) managing our infrastructure, including the anticipated addition of our
new warehouse facility in Moreno Valley, California, (ii) retaining and hiring, as required, the
appropriate number of qualified employees, (iii) managing inventory levels and (iv) controlling
other expenses. If the global economic slowdown worsens and leads to an unexpected decline in our
revenues without a corresponding and timely reduction in expenses or a failure to manage other
aspects of our operations, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations or financial condition.
We May Be Adversely Affected By The Failure Of Financial Institutions To Fulfill Their Commitments
Under Our Secured Line Of Credit.
As discussed in Part II, Item 7 (Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources) of this report, we have a secured line
of credit with financial institutions available for our use, for which we pay commitment fees. The
line of credit is provided by a syndicate of three financial institutions, with each institution
agreeing severally (and not jointly) to make revolving credit loans to us in accordance with the
terms of the related loan agreement. If one or more of the financial institutions providing the
line of credit were to default on its obligation to fund its commitment, the portion of the line of
credit provided by such defaulting financial institution would not be available to us, which could
have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.
Our Future Success Depends On Our Ability To Respond To Changing Consumer Demands, Identify And
Interpret Fashion Trends And Successfully Market New Products.
The footwear industry is subject to rapidly changing consumer demands and fashion trends.
Accordingly, we must identify and interpret fashion trends and respond in a timely manner. Demand
for and market acceptance of new products are uncertain and achieving market acceptance for new
products generally requires substantial product development and marketing efforts and expenditures.
If we do not continue to meet changing consumer demands and develop successful styles in the
future, our growth and profitability will be negatively impacted. We frequently make decisions
about product designs and marketing expenditures several months in advance of the time when
consumer acceptance can be determined. If we fail to anticipate, identify or react appropriately to
changes in styles and trends or are not successful in marketing new products, we could experience
excess inventories, higher than normal markdowns or an inability to profitably sell our products.
Because of these risks, a number of companies in the footwear industry specifically, and others in
the fashion and apparel industry in general, have experienced periods of rapid growth in revenues
and earnings and thereafter periods of declining sales and losses, which in some cases have
resulted in companies in these industries ceasing to do business. Similarly, these risks could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Our Childrens Shoe Business May Be Negatively Impacted By The Consumer Product Safety Improvement
Act Of 2008.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued new standards, effective February 10, 2009,
under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA) regarding lead content in
consumer products directed at children 12 years of age and under, including childrens shoes. The
new standard applies retroactively to all products that exist on February 10, 2009 and it is not
15
limited to new manufacturing. We have been working to ensure that covered products are
appropriately tested. There is still uncertainty regarding the meaning of the CPSIA and how it
applies to products or product components and the level of detail that each of our retailers will
require. Consequently, we are unable to predict whether the total financial impact of these new
standards will have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operation or financial
condition.
Our Business And The Success Of Our Products Could Be Harmed If We Are Unable To Maintain Our Brand
Image.
Our success to date has been due in large part to the strength of the Skechers brand, and to a
lesser degree, the reputation of our fashion brands. If we are unable to timely and appropriately
respond to changing consumer demand, our brand name and brand image
may be impaired. Even if we react appropriately to changes in consumer preferences, consumers
may consider our brand image to be outdated or associate our brand with styles of footwear that are
no longer popular. In the past, several footwear companies including ours have experienced periods
of rapid growth in revenues and earnings followed by periods of declining sales and losses. Our
business may be similarly affected in the future.
We Face Intense Competition, Including Competition From Companies With Significantly Greater
Resources Than Ours, And If We Are Unable To Compete Effectively With These Companies, Our Market
Share May Decline And Our Business Could Be Harmed.
We face intense competition in the footwear industry from other established companies. A
number of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technological, engineering,
manufacturing, marketing and distribution resources than we do. Their greater capabilities in these
areas may enable them to better withstand periodic downturns in the footwear industry, compete more
effectively on the basis of price and production and more quickly develop new products. In
addition, new companies may enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing competition
in the footwear industry.
We believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including
the style and quality of our products and the strength of our brand name, as well as many factors
beyond our control. We may not be able to compete successfully in the future, and increased
competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins, loss of market share and an
inability to generate cash flows that are sufficient to maintain or expand our development and
marketing of new products, which would adversely impact the trading price of our Class A Common
Stock.
We Depend Upon A Relatively Small Group Of Customers For A Large Portion Of Our Sales.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, our net sales to our five largest customers accounted for
approximately 24.1%, 25.3%, and 24.9% of total net sales, respectively. No customer accounted for
more than 10.0% of our net sales during 2008, 2007 and 2006. No customer accounted for over 10.0%
of net trade receivables at December 31, 2008. One customer accounted for 10.0% of net trade
receivables at December 31, 2007. Although we have long-term relationships with many of our
customers, our customers do not have a contractual obligation to purchase our products and we
cannot be certain that we will be able to retain our existing major customers. Furthermore, the
retail industry regularly experiences consolidation, contractions and closings which may result in
our loss of customers or our inability to collect accounts receivable of major customers. If we
lose a major customer, experience a significant decrease in sales to a major customer or are unable
to collect the accounts receivable of a major customer, our business could be harmed.
We May Be Unable To Successfully Execute Our Growth Strategy Or Maintain Our Growth.
Although our company has generally exhibited steady growth since we began operations, we had a
decrease in net sales in the past and our rate of growth has declined at times as well, and we may
experience similar decreases in net sales or declines in rate of growth again in the future. Our
ability to grow in the future depends upon, among other things, the continued success of our
efforts to maintain our brand image and expand our footwear offerings and distribution channels.
As our business grows, we may need to improve and enhance our overall financial and managerial
controls, reporting systems and procedures to effectively manage our growth. We may be unable to
successfully implement our current growth strategy or other growth strategies or effectively manage
our growth, any of which would negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Furthermore, in anticipation of continued increases in net sales, we have significantly
expanded our infrastructure and workforce to achieve economies of scale. Because these expenses are
mostly fixed in the short term, our operating results and margins will be adversely impacted if we
do not continue to grow as anticipated.
16
Many Of Our Retail Stores Depend Heavily On The Customer Traffic Generated By Shopping And Factory
Outlet Malls Or By Tourism.
Many of our concept stores are located in shopping malls and some of our factory outlet stores
are located in manufacturers outlet malls where we depend on obtaining prominent locations and the
overall success of the malls to generate customer traffic. We cannot control the success of
individual malls, and an increase in store closures by other retailers may lead to mall vacancies
and reduced foot traffic. Some of our concept stores occupy street locations that are heavily
dependent on customer traffic generated by tourism. Any substantial decrease in tourism resulting
from the global economic slowdown, political, social or military events or otherwise, is likely to
adversely affect sales in our existing stores, particularly those with street locations. The
effects of these factors could reduce sales of particular existing stores or hinder our ability to
open retail stores in new markets, which could negatively affect our operating results.
Our International Sales And Manufacturing Operations Are Subject To The Risks Of Doing Business
Abroad, Particularly In China, Which Could Affect Our Ability To Sell Or Manufacture Our Products
In International Markets, Obtain Products From Foreign Suppliers Or Control The Costs Of Our
Products.
Substantially all of our net sales during the year ended December 31, 2008 were derived from
sales of footwear manufactured in foreign countries, with most manufactured in China and, to a
lesser extent, in Italy, Vietnam and Brazil. We also sell our footwear in several foreign countries
and plan to increase our international sales efforts as part of our growth strategy. Foreign
manufacturing and sales are subject to a number of risks, including the following: political and
social unrest, including the military presence in Iraq and terrorism; changing economic conditions,
including higher labor costs; increased costs of raw materials; currency exchange rate
fluctuations; labor shortages and work stoppages; electrical shortages; transportation delays; loss
or damage to products in transit; expropriation; nationalization; the adjustment, elimination or
imposition of domestic and international duties, tariffs, quotas, import and export controls and
other non-tariff barriers; exposure to different legal standards (particularly with respect to
intellectual property); compliance with foreign laws; and changes in domestic and foreign
governmental policies. We have not, to date, been materially affected by any such risks, but we
cannot predict the likelihood of such developments occurring or the resulting long-term adverse
impact on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
In particular, because most of our products are manufactured in China, the possibility of
adverse changes in trade or political relations with China, political instability in China,
increases in labor costs, the occurrence of prolonged adverse weather conditions or a natural
disaster such as an earthquake or typhoon in China, or the outbreak of a pandemic disease such as
the Avian Flu in China could severely interfere with the manufacture and/or shipment of our
products and would have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, electrical
shortages, labor shortages or work stoppages may extend the production time necessary to produce
our orders, and there may be circumstances in the future where we may have to incur premium freight
charges to expedite the delivery of product to our customers. If we incur a significant amount of
premium charges to airfreight product for our customers, our gross profit will be negatively
affected if we are unable to collect those charges.
Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations In China Could Result In Higher Costs And Decreased Margins.
Our manufacturers located in China may be subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations
should the Chinese currency not remain stable with the U.S. dollar. The value of the Chinese
currency depends to a large extent on the Chinese governments policies and Chinas domestic and
international economic and political developments. Since 1994, the official exchange rate for the
conversion of the Chinese currency was pegged to the U.S. dollar at a virtually fixed rate of
approximately 8.28 Yuan per U.S. dollar. However, on July 21, 2005, the Chinese government revalued
the Yuan by 2.1%, setting the exchange rate at 8.11 Yuan per U.S. dollar, and adopted a more
flexible system based on a trade-weighted basket of foreign currencies of Chinas main trading
partners. Under the new managed float policy, the exchange rate of the Yuan may shift each day up
to 0.3% in either direction from the previous days close, and as a result, the exchange rate
measured 6.82 Yuan per U.S. dollar at December 31, 2008. The valuation of the Yuan may continue to
increase incrementally over time should the China central bank allow it to do so, which could
significantly increase labor and other costs incurred in the production of our footwear in China,
resulting in an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The Potential Imposition Of Additional Duties, Quotas, Tariffs And Other Trade Restrictions Could
Have An Adverse Impact On Our Sales And Profitability.
All of our products manufactured overseas and imported into the United States, the European
Union (EU) and other countries are subject to customs duties collected by customs authorities.
Customs information submitted by us is routinely subject to review by customs authorities. We are
unable to predict whether additional customs duties, quotas, tariffs, anti-dumping duties,
safeguard
17
measures, cargo restrictions to prevent terrorism or other trade restrictions may be imposed
on the importation of our products in the future. Such actions could result in increases in the
cost of our products generally and might adversely affect the sales and profitability of Skechers
and the imported footwear industry as a whole.
Our Quarterly Revenues And Operating Results Fluctuate As A Result Of A Variety Of Factors,
Including Seasonal Fluctuations In Demand For Footwear, Delivery Date Delays And Potential
Fluctuations In Our Annualized Tax Rate, Which May Result In Volatility Of Our Stock Price.
Our quarterly revenues and operating results have varied significantly in the past and can be
expected to fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our
control. Our major customers generally have no obligation to purchase forecasted amounts and may
cancel orders, change delivery schedules or change the mix of products ordered with minimal notice
and without penalty. As a result, we may not be able to accurately predict our quarterly sales. In
addition, sales of footwear products have historically been somewhat seasonal in nature with the
strongest sales generally occurring in our second and third quarters for the back-to-school selling
season. Back-to-school sales typically ship in June, July and August, and delays in the timing,
cancellation, or rescheduling of these customer orders and shipments by our wholesale customers
could negatively impact our net sales and results of operations for our second or third quarters.
More specifically, the timing of when products are shipped is determined by the delivery schedules
set by our wholesale customers, which could cause sales to shift between our second and third
quarters. Because our expense levels are partially based on our expectations of future net sales,
our expenses may be disproportionately large relative to our revenues, and we may be unable to
adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shifts, which could
have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Our annualized tax rate is based on projections of our domestic and international operating
results for the year, which we review and revise as necessary at the end of each quarter, and it is
highly sensitive to fluctuations in projected international earnings. Any quarterly fluctuations in
our annualized tax rate that may occur could have a material impact on our quarterly operating
results. As a result of these specific and other general factors, our operating results will likely
vary from quarter to quarter and the results for any particular quarter may not be necessarily
indicative of results for the full year. Any shortfall in revenues or net income from levels
expected by securities analysts and investors could cause a decrease in the trading price of our
Class A Common Stock.
We Rely On Independent Contract Manufacturers And, As A Result, Are Exposed To Potential
Disruptions In Product Supply.
Our footwear products are currently manufactured by independent contract manufacturers. During
2008 and 2007, the top four manufacturers of our products produced approximately 58.2% and 58.4% of
our total purchases, respectively. One manufacturer accounted for 30.6% and 29.7% of total
purchases during 2008 and 2007, respectively. One other manufacturer accounted for over 10.0% of
our total purchases during 2008. Two other manufacturers each accounted for over 10.0% of our
total purchases during 2007. We do not have long-term contracts with our manufacturers, and we
compete with other footwear companies for production facilities. We could experience difficulties
with these manufacturers, including reductions in the availability of production capacity, failure
to meet our quality control standards, failure to meet production deadlines or increased
manufacturing costs. In particular, manufacturers in China are facing a labor shortage as migrant
workers seek better wages and working conditions in farming and other vocations, and if this trend
continues, our current manufacturers operations could be adversely affected.
If our current manufacturers cease doing business with us, we could experience an interruption
in the manufacture of our products. Although we believe that we could find alternative
manufacturers, we may be unable to establish relationships with alternative manufacturers that will
be as favorable as the relationships we have now. For example, new manufacturers may have higher
prices, less favorable payment terms, lower manufacturing capacity, lower quality standards or
higher lead times for delivery. If we are unable to provide products consistent with our standards
or the manufacture of our footwear is delayed or becomes more expensive, this could result in our
customers canceling orders, refusing to accept deliveries or demanding reductions in purchase
prices, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of
operations.
Our Business Could Be Harmed If Our Contract Manufacturers, Suppliers Or Licensees Violate Labor,
Trade Or Other Laws.
We require our independent contract manufacturers, suppliers and licensees to operate in
compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Manufacturers are required to certify that neither
convicted, forced or indentured labor (as defined under United States law) nor child labor (as
defined by law in the manufacturers country) is used in the production process, that compensation
is paid in accordance with local law and that their factories are in compliance with local safety
regulations. Although we promote ethical
18
business practices and our sourcing personnel periodically visit and monitor the operations of
our independent contract manufacturers, suppliers and licensees, we do not control them or their
labor practices. If one of our independent contract manufacturers, suppliers or licensees violates
labor or other laws or diverges from those labor practices generally accepted as ethical in the
United States, it could result in adverse publicity for us, damage our reputation in the United
States or render our conduct of business in a particular foreign country undesirable or
impractical, any of which could harm our business.
In addition, if we, or our foreign manufacturers, violate United States or foreign trade laws
or regulations, we may be subject to extra duties, significant monetary penalties, the seizure and
the forfeiture of the products we are attempting to import or the loss of our import privileges.
Possible violations of United States or foreign laws or regulations could include inadequate record
keeping of our imported products, misstatements or errors as to the origin, quota category,
classification, marketing or valuation of our imported products, fraudulent visas or labor
violations. The effects of these factors could render our conduct of business in a particular
country undesirable or impractical and have a negative impact on our operating results.
Our Operating Results Could Be Negatively Impacted If Our Sales Are Concentrated In Any One Style
Or Group Of Styles.
If any one style or group of similar styles of our footwear were to represent a substantial
portion of our net sales, we could be exposed to risk should consumer demand for such style or
group of styles decrease in subsequent periods. We attempt to mitigate this risk by offering a
broad range of products, and no style comprised over 5% of our gross wholesale sales during 2008 or
2007. However, this may change in the future and fluctuations in sales of any given style that
represents a significant portion of our future net sales could have a negative impact on our
operating results.
Our Strategies Involve A Number Of Risks That Could Prevent Or Delay Any Successful Opening Of New
Stores As Well As Impact The Performance Of Our Existing Stores.
Our ability to open and operate new stores successfully depends on many factors, including,
among others, our ability to identify suitable store locations, the availability of which is
outside of our control; negotiate acceptable lease terms, including desired tenant improvement
allowances; source sufficient levels of inventory to meet the needs of new stores; hire, train and
retain store personnel; successfully integrate new stores into our existing operations; and satisfy
the fashion preferences in new geographic areas.
In addition, some or a substantial number of new stores could be opened in regions of the
United States in which we currently have few or no stores. Any expansion into new markets may
present competitive, merchandising and distribution challenges that are different from those
currently encountered in our existing markets. Any of these challenges could adversely affect our
business and results of operations. In addition, to the extent that any new store openings are in
existing markets, we may experience reduced net sales volumes in existing stores in those markets.
We Depend On Key Personnel To Manage Our Business Effectively In A Rapidly Changing Market, And If
We Are Unable To Retain Existing Personnel, Our Business Could Be Harmed.
Our future success depends upon the continued services of Robert Greenberg, Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Greenberg, President, and David Weinberg, Executive Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer. The loss of the services of any of these individuals or any
other key employee could harm us. Our future success also depends on our ability to identify,
attract and retain additional qualified personnel. Competition for employees in our industry is
intense and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
The Disruption, Expense And Potential Liability Associated With Existing And Unanticipated Future
Litigation Against Us Could Have A Material Adverse Effect On Our Business, Results Of Operations
And Financial Condition.
We are subject to various legal proceedings and threatened legal proceedings from time to time
as part of our business. We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings or aware of any
threatened legal proceedings, the adverse outcome of which, individually or in the aggregate, we
believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial
condition. However, any unanticipated litigation in the future, regardless of its merits, could
significantly divert managements attention from our operations and result in substantial legal
fees to us. Further, there can be no assurance that any actions that have been or will be brought
against us will be resolved in our favor or, if significant monetary judgments are rendered against
us, that we will have the ability to pay such judgments. Such disruptions, legal fees and any
losses resulting from these claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
19
Our Ability To Compete Could Be Jeopardized If We Are Unable To Protect Our Intellectual Property
Rights Or If We Are Sued For Intellectual Property Infringement.
We believe that our trademarks, design patents and other proprietary rights are important to
our success and our competitive position. We use trademarks on nearly all of our products and
believe that having distinctive marks that are readily identifiable is an important factor in
creating a market for our goods, in identifying us and in distinguishing our goods from the goods
of others. We consider our Skechers®, S in Shield Design® and Performance-S Shifted Design®
trademarks to be among our most valuable assets, and we have registered these trademarks in many
countries. In addition, we own many other trademarks that we utilize in marketing our products. We
also have a number of design patents and a limited number of utility patents covering components
and features used in various shoes. We believe that our patents and trademarks are generally
sufficient to permit us to carry on our business as presently conducted. While we vigorously
protect our trademarks against infringement, we cannot assure you that we will be able to secure
patents or trademark protection for our intellectual property in the future or that protection will
be adequate for future products. Further, we have been sued for patent and trademark infringement
and cannot be sure that our activities do not and will not infringe on the intellectual property
rights of others. If we are compelled to prosecute infringing parties, defend our intellectual
property or defend ourselves from intellectual property claims made by others, we may face
significant expenses and liability as well as the diversion of managements attention from our
business, each of which could negatively impact our business or financial condition.
In addition, the laws of foreign countries where we source and distribute our products may not
protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. We
cannot assure you that the actions we have taken to establish and protect our trademarks and other
intellectual property rights outside the United States will be adequate to prevent imitation of our
products by others or, if necessary, successfully challenge another partys counterfeit products or
products that otherwise infringe on our intellectual property rights on the basis of trademark or
patent infringement. Continued sales of these products could adversely affect our sales and our
brand and result in the shift of consumer preference away from our products. We may face
significant expenses and liability in connection with the protection of our intellectual property
rights outside the United States, and if we are unable to successfully protect our rights or
resolve intellectual property conflicts with others, our business or financial condition could be
adversely affected.
Natural Disasters Or A Decline In Economic Conditions In California Could Increase Our Operating
Expenses Or Adversely Affect Our Sales Revenue.
A substantial portion of our operations are located in California, including 47 of our retail
stores, our headquarters in Manhattan Beach, our current domestic distribution center in Ontario
and our future domestic distribution center in Moreno Valley. Because a significant portion of our
net sales is derived from sales in California, a decline in the economic conditions in California,
whether or not such decline spreads beyond California, could materially adversely affect our
business. Furthermore, a natural disaster or other catastrophic event, such as an earthquake or
wild fires affecting California, could significantly disrupt our business including the operation
of our only domestic distribution center. We may be more susceptible to these issues than our
competitors whose operations are not as concentrated in California.
One Principal Stockholder Is Able To Control Substantially All Matters Requiring A Vote Of Our
Stockholders And His Interests May Differ From The Interests Of Our Other Stockholders.
As of December 31, 2008, Robert Greenberg, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
beneficially owned 78.3% of our outstanding Class B Common Stock and members of Mr. Greenbergs
immediate family beneficially owned the remainder of our outstanding Class B Common Stock. The
holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock have identical rights except that holders
of Class A Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share while holders of Class B Common Stock
are entitled to ten votes per share on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. As a
result, as of December 31, 2008, Mr. Greenberg beneficially owned approximately 62.0% of the
aggregate number of votes eligible to be cast by our stockholders, and together with shares
beneficially owned by other members of his immediate family, he beneficially owned approximately
79.3% of the aggregate number of votes eligible to be cast by our stockholders. Mr. Greenberg may
have different interests than our other stockholders, and because he is able to control
substantially all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, he may direct the operations of
our business in a manner contrary to the interests of our other stockholders. Matters that require
the approval of our stockholders include the election of directors and the approval of mergers or
other business combination transactions. Mr. Greenberg also has control over our management and
affairs. As a result of such control, certain transactions are not possible without the approval
of Mr. Greenberg, including proxy contests, tender offers, open market purchase programs or other
transactions that can give our stockholders the opportunity to realize a premium over the
then-prevailing market prices for their shares of our Class A Common Stock. The
20
differential in the voting rights may adversely affect the value of our Class A Common Stock
to the extent that investors or any potential future purchaser view the superior voting rights of
our Class B Common Stock to have value.
Our Charter Documents And Delaware Law May Inhibit A Takeover, Which May Cause A Decline In The
Value Of Our Stock.
Provisions of Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws could make it more
difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if closing such a transaction would be beneficial
to our stockholders. Mr. Greenbergs substantial beneficial ownership position, together with the
authorization of Preferred Stock, the disparate voting rights between our Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock, the classification of our Board of Directors and the lack of cumulative
voting in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, may have the effect of delaying, deferring
or preventing a change in control, may discourage bids for our Class A Common Stock at a premium
over the market price of the Class A Common Stock and may adversely affect the market price of our
Class A Common Stock.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our corporate headquarters and additional administrative offices are located at five premises
in Manhattan Beach, California, which consist of an aggregate of approximately 150,000 square feet.
We own and lease portions of our corporate headquarters and administrative offices. The property
leases expire between October 2010 and February 2012, with options to extend these leases in some
cases, and the current aggregate annual rent for the leased property is approximately $0.5 million.
Our U.S. distribution center consists of four leased facilities and one that we own, which are
located in Ontario, California. The four leased facilities aggregate approximately 1,410,000 square
feet, with an annual base rent of approximately $5.9 million. The owned distribution facility is
approximately 264,000 square feet. The property leases expire between May 2009 and May 2011, and
these leases contain rent escalation provisions. During 2007, we entered into a lease to build a
new approximately 1.8 million square foot distribution facility in Moreno Valley, California which
we expect to be substantially completed during 2009. Once completed, we will occupy the facility
under an eleven-year lease with one option to extend the lease four years followed by two options
to extend the lease by additional five-year terms, and we will move out of our existing
distribution facilities in Ontario, California. Base rent for the new facility will be $679,540
per month for month 1 through month 60 and $788,267 per month for month 61 through month 132.
Our European distribution center consists of two leased facilities which aggregate
approximately 490,000 square-feet in Liege, Belgium under a 20-year operating lease with base rent
of approximately $2.9 million per year. The lease agreement also provides for early termination
rights at five-year intervals beginning in April 2014, pending notification as prescribed in the
lease, of which the first such right was not exercised.
All of our domestic retail stores and showrooms are leased with terms expiring between July
2009 and June 2023. The leases provide for rent escalations tied to either increases in the
lessors operating expenses, fluctuations in the consumer price index in the relevant geographical
area or a percentage of the stores gross sales in excess of the base annual rent. Total base rent
expense related to our domestic retail stores and showrooms was $29.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
We also lease all of our international administrative offices, retail stores and showrooms
located in Brazil, Malaysia, Thailand, Canada, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain,
Italy, and Netherlands. The property leases expire at various dates between February 2010 and April
2018. Total rent for the leased properties aggregated approximately $11.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See note 13 to the financial statements on page 57 of this annual report for a discussion of
legal proceedings as required under applicable SEC disclosure rules and regulations.
21
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to our security holders to be voted on during the fourth quarter of
2008.
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our Class A Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol SKX. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our Class A
Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIGH |
|
LOW |
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
23.36 |
|
|
$ |
16.05 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
25.20 |
|
|
|
17.14 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
24.00 |
|
|
|
15.56 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
16.84 |
|
|
|
9.25 |
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
38.03 |
|
|
$ |
31.95 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
36.87 |
|
|
|
28.41 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
30.44 |
|
|
|
17.36 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
25.57 |
|
|
|
18.75 |
|
HOLDERS
As of February 15, 2009, there were 109 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock
(including holders who are nominees for an undetermined number of beneficial owners) and 18 holders
of record of our Class B Common Stock. These figures do not include beneficial owners who hold
shares in nominee name. The Class B Common Stock is not publicly traded but each share is
convertible upon request of the holder into one share of Class A Common Stock.
DIVIDEND POLICY
Since our conversion from an S Corporation to a C Corporation prior to the initial public
offering of our Class A Common Stock in 1999, earnings have been and will be retained for the
foreseeable future in the operations of our business. We have not declared or paid any cash
dividends on our Class A Common Stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. Our current policy is to retain all of our earnings to finance the growth and
development of our business.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Our equity compensation plan information is provided as set forth in Part III, Item 12 of this
annual report.
22
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph demonstrates the total return to stockholders of our companys Class A
Common Stock from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2008, relative to the performance of the
Russell 2000 Index, which includes our Class A Common Stock, and our peer group index, which
consists of seven companies believed to be engaged in similar businesses: Nike, Inc., adidas AG,
K-Swiss Inc., Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., Steven Madden, Ltd., The Timberland Company and
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2003 in each of our companys Class A
Common Stock and the stocks comprising each of the Russell 2000 Index and the customized peer group
index. Each of the indices assumes that all dividends were reinvested. The stock performance of
our companys Class A Common Stock shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future
performance. We will not make nor endorse any predictions as to our future stock performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company/Index |
|
12/31/03 |
|
12/31/04 |
|
12/31/05 |
|
12/31/06 |
|
12/31/07 |
|
12/31/08 |
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
159.02 |
|
|
|
187.98 |
|
|
|
408.71 |
|
|
|
239.39 |
|
|
|
157.30 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
118.33 |
|
|
|
123.72 |
|
|
|
146.44 |
|
|
|
144.15 |
|
|
|
95.44 |
|
Custom Peer Group |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
131.39 |
|
|
|
139.20 |
|
|
|
156.54 |
|
|
|
195.81 |
|
|
|
164.17 |
|
23
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables set forth our companys selected consolidated financial data as of and
for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2008 and should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included under
Part II, Item 8 of this annual report.
(In thousands, except net earnings per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS DATA: |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,440,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,205,368 |
|
|
$ |
1,006,477 |
|
|
$ |
920,322 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
595,922 |
|
|
|
599,989 |
|
|
|
523,346 |
|
|
|
420,482 |
|
|
|
370,857 |
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
57,892 |
|
|
|
112,930 |
|
|
|
112,544 |
|
|
|
76,296 |
|
|
|
49,245 |
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
60,743 |
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
112,648 |
|
|
|
72,797 |
|
|
|
38,720 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
55,396 |
|
|
|
75,686 |
|
|
|
70,994 |
|
|
|
44,717 |
|
|
|
23,553 |
|
Net earnings per share:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
1.13 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
Weighted average shares:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
46,031 |
|
|
|
45,262 |
|
|
|
41,079 |
|
|
|
39,686 |
|
|
|
38,638 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
46,708 |
|
|
|
46,741 |
|
|
|
46,139 |
|
|
|
44,518 |
|
|
|
39,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF DECEMBER 31, |
BALANCE SHEET DATA: |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Working capital |
|
$ |
413,771 |
|
|
$ |
523,888 |
|
|
$ |
450,787 |
|
|
$ |
361,210 |
|
|
$ |
313,883 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
876,316 |
|
|
|
827,977 |
|
|
|
737,053 |
|
|
|
581,957 |
|
|
|
518,653 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current portion |
|
|
16,188 |
|
|
|
16,462 |
|
|
|
106,805 |
|
|
|
107,288 |
|
|
|
113,038 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
668,693 |
|
|
|
626,663 |
|
|
|
449,087 |
|
|
|
343,830 |
|
|
|
294,895 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Basic earnings per share represents net earnings divided by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share, in addition to the
weighted average determined for basic earnings per share, reflects the potential dilution that
could occur if options to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock and
assumes the conversion of our 4.50% convertible subordinated notes for the period outstanding
since their issuance in April 2002 until their conversion in February 2007, unless their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive. |
24
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
We design, market and sell contemporary footwear for men, women and children under the
Skechers brand as well as several other fashion and street brands. Our footwear is sold through a
wide range of department stores and leading specialty retail stores, mid-tier retailers, boutiques,
our own retail stores, distributor-owned international retail stores and our e-commerce website.
Our objective is to continue to profitably grow our domestic operations while leveraging our brand
name to expand internationally.
Our operations are organized along our distribution channels, and we have the following four
reportable sales segments domestic wholesale sales, international wholesale sales, retail sales
and e-commerce sales. We evaluate segment performance based primarily on net sales and gross
margins. See detailed segment information in note 14 to our consolidated financial statements
included under Part II, Item 8 of this annual report.
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
Our net sales for 2008 were $1.441 billion, an increase of $46.6 million or 3.3% over net
sales of $1.394 billion in 2007. Net earnings were $55.4 million, a decrease of $20.3 million or
26.8% from net earnings of $75.7 million in 2007. Diluted earnings per share were $1.19, which
reflected a 27% decrease from the $1.63 reported in the prior year. Working capital was $413.8
million at December 31, 2008, a decrease of $110.1 million from working capital of $523.9 million
at December 31, 2007. Cash and short-term investments decreased by $189.1 million to $114.9
million in 2008 compared to $304.0 million at December 31, 2007, primarily due to our
reclassification of $81.9 million of our investments in auction rate securities to long-term
assets, increases in capital expenditures, increased inventory and accounts receivable balances.
2008 INITIATIVES
Our 2008 initiatives focused on product development, domestic and international growth, and
development of infrastructure.
New product design and delivery. Our success depends on our ability to design and deliver
trend-right, affordable product in a diverse range. In 2008, we focused on continuously updating
our core styles, adding fresh looks to our existing lines, and developing or acquiring new lines.
This approach has broadened our product offering and ensured the relevance of our brands. During
2008, we added Punkrose, Public Royalty and Bebe Sport to our fashion and street brands.
Grow our domestic business with new opportunities. In 2008, our focus was on maintaining our
core Skechers business in our domestic wholesale accounts while finding new opportunities to add
shelf space with the addition of new categories within the Skechers brand and our new fashion
brands.
Further develop our international businesses. In 2008, we continued to focus on improving our
international operations by (i) increasing our customer base within our existing subsidiary
business; (ii) increasing the product offering within each account; (iii) delivering the right
product into the right markets; (iv) building our offering of Marc Ecko and Zoo York product in
select global markets, (v) growing our distributor business, and (vi) growing our presence in
existing markets by developing joint ventures. We established three joint ventures: China, Hong
Kong and Malaysia/Thailand/Singapore, which are intended to enable us to access these fast growing
markets with partners knowledgeable in those regions in an efficient manner.
Develop our infrastructure to support continued growth. During 2007, we entered into a lease
agreement to build a new 1.8 million square foot distribution facility to consolidate all of our
domestic distribution facilities into one location that we expect to be completed by the end of
2009 and to occupy in 2010. Once this new facility is built, we plan to move out of our five
existing distribution facilities in Ontario, California.
OUTLOOK FOR 2009
In 2009, we are focusing on maintaining our domestic and international market share in a
difficult global retail environment by continuing to offer fresh and stylish products at affordable
values. We will also introduce new categories and brands, such as TapouT, in the domestic market,
and possibly introduce these brands internationally. These new products do not directly compete
with our
25
existing brands and allow us the opportunity to broaden the targeted demographic profile of
our consumer base, increase our shelf space and open new doors without detracting from existing
business.
We will continue to grow our international business with the goal of increasing that business
to 25% to 30% of our total business. We are also seeking to increase our global presence through
our joint ventures in Asia, and we will continue to develop our new Brazilian subsidiarys business
in that country. We are also looking to grow in new markets with new distributors as well as
increase our presence in existing markets.
We will also continue to expand our retail distribution channel by opening another 15 to 18
domestic stores and two international company-owned stores in 2009.
We are also focusing on our profitability in 2009 by reducing our inventory levels and
expenses to be in line with our current expected sales. We will continue to manage our balance
sheet and the cash position that we have carefully grown over the years. We are committed to
continuing to develop Skechers as a relevant brand with compelling products and meeting the
footwear needs of our wholesale customers and consumers.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
Net sales
Net sales for 2008 were $1.441 billion, an increase of $46.6 million, or 3.3%, over net sales
of $1.394 billion in 2007. The increase in net sales was primarily due to increased international
wholesale sales and growth within the domestic retail segment from an increased store base
partially offset by lower domestic wholesale sales.
Our domestic wholesale net sales decreased 2.9%, or $24.2 million, to $807.0 million in 2008
compared to $831.2 million in 2007. The decrease in our domestic wholesale segment was broad-based
and across key divisions primarily due to the weak U.S. retail environment. The average selling
price per pair within the domestic wholesale segment decreased to $19.21 per pair for 2008 from
$19.22 in 2007. The decrease in domestic wholesale segment sales came on a 2.8% unit sales volume
decrease to 42.0 million pairs in 2008 from 43.2 million pairs in 2007.
Our international wholesale segment net sales increased $64.9 million to $332.5 million in
2008, a 24.2% increase over sales of $267.6 million in 2007. Our international wholesale sales
consist of direct subsidiary sales those we make to department stores and specialty retailers
and sales to our distributors who in turn sell to department stores and specialty retailers in
various international regions where we do not sell direct. Direct subsidiary sales increased $61.0
million, or 42.3%, to $205.0 million compared to sales of $144.0 million in 2007. The increase in
direct subsidiary sales was primarily due to increased sales into Germany, UK, Switzerland, and
Brazil. Our distributor net sales increased $3.9 million to $127.5 million in 2008, a 3.2%
increase over sales of $123.6 million in 2007. This was primarily due to increased sales to our
distributors in Dubai, Panama, and Chile.
Our retail segment net sales increased $3.7 million to $283.1 million in 2008, a 1.4% increase
over sales of $279.4 million in 2007. The increase in retail sales was due to a net increase of 32
stores partially offset by negative comparable store sales (i.e., sales by stores open for at least
one year). For 2008, our domestic retail sales increased 1.0% while our international retail sales
increased 4.7% compared to the prior year. During 2008, we realized negative comparable store
sales of 9.3% in our domestic stores, while we realized negative comparable store sales of 3.3% in
our international stores. During 2008, we opened 31 new domestic stores and three international
stores, and we closed two domestic stores. These new stores contributed $13.8 million in net sales
during 2008 as compared to new store sales of $16.9 million for 42 other stores opened in 2007.
Of our new store additions, 22 were concept stores, 10 were outlet stores, and two were warehouse
stores.
We had 204 domestic stores and 19 international retail stores as of February 15, 2009, and we
currently plan to open approximately 15 to 18 domestic and two international stores in 2009.
During 2008, we closed two stores, and we also closed two stores in 2007. We periodically review
all of our stores for impairment. During 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $1.7 million
related to eight of our domestic stores. During 2007, we did not record a similar impairment
charge. Further, we carefully review our under-performing stores and may consider the non-renewal
of leases upon completion of the current term of the applicable lease.
Our e-commerce net sales increased $2.2 million to $18.1 million in 2008, a 13.4% increase
over sales of $15.9 million in 2007. Our e-commerce sales made up 1% of our consolidated sales in
both 2008 and 2007.
26
Gross profit
Gross profit for 2008 decreased $4.1 million to $595.9 million as compared to $600.0 million
in 2007. Gross margin decreased to 41.4% in 2008 from 43.0% in 2007. The gross margin decrease
was largely the result of reduced domestic wholesale margins that were partially offset by higher
international wholesale margins caused by a higher proportion of our revenues coming from our
international wholesale segment through foreign subsidiaries, which achieved higher gross margins
than our domestic wholesale segment or sales through our foreign distributors. Gross profit for
our domestic wholesale segment decreased $43.8 million, or 13.7%, to $276.6 million in 2008
compared to $320.4 million in 2007. Domestic wholesale margins decreased to 34.3% in 2008 from
38.5% for 2007. The decrease in domestic wholesale margins was due to higher closeouts, product
mix changes and continued price pressure resulting from the weak U.S. retail environment.
Gross profit for our international wholesale segment increased $38.0 million, or 38.2%, to
$137.8 million for 2008 compared to $99.8 million in 2007. Gross margins were 41.5% for 2008
compared to 37.3% in 2007. Gross margins for our direct subsidiary sales were 49.2% in 2008 as
compared to 45.0% in 2007. Gross margins for our distributor sales were 29.0% in 2008 as compared
to 28.2% in 2007. The increase in gross margins for the international wholesale segment was due to
increased subsidiary sales, which achieved higher gross margins than our international wholesale
sales through our foreign distributors.
Gross profit for our retail segment increased $1.1 million, or 0.7%, to $172.9 million in 2008
as compared to $171.8 million in 2007. Gross margins were 61.1% for 2008 compared to 61.5% in
2007. Gross margins for our international stores were 66.2% in 2008 as compared to 62.3% in 2007.
Gross margins for our domestic stores were 60.6% in 2008 as compared to 61.4% in 2007. The
decrease in domestic retail margins was due to higher closeouts, product mix changes and continued
price pressure resulting from the weak U.S. retail environment.
Our cost of sales includes the cost of footwear purchased from our manufacturers, royalties,
duties, quota costs, inbound freight (including ocean, air and freight from the dock to our
distribution centers), broker fees and storage costs. Because we include expenses related to our
distribution network in general and administrative expenses while some of our competitors may
include expenses of this type in cost of sales, our gross margins may not be comparable, and we may
report higher gross margins than some of our competitors in part for this reason.
Selling expenses
Selling expenses increased by $0.4 million, or 0.3%, to $126.9 million for 2008 from $126.5
million in 2007. As a percentage of net sales, selling expenses were 8.8% and 9.1% in 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase in selling expenses was primarily due to higher sample costs and
selling commissions partially offset by lower promotional costs and reduced trade show expenses.
Selling expenses consist primarily of the following: sales representative sample costs, sales
commissions, trade shows, advertising and promotional costs, which may include television and ad
production costs, and expenses associated with marketing materials.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $48.9 million, or 13.4%, to $413.6 million
for 2008 from $364.7 million in 2007. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative
expenses were 28.7% and 26.2% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in general and
administrative expenses was primarily due to increased salaries and wages along with payroll
expenses and benefit costs of $11.7 million including stock compensation costs of $2.3 million,
higher rent expense of $8.4 million due to an additional 32 stores from prior year and new
international facilities, increased bad debt expense of $5.7 million, and increased warehouse and
distribution costs of $5.6 million. In addition, the expenses related to our distribution network,
including the functions of purchasing, receiving, inspecting, allocating, warehousing and packaging
of our products totaled $112.6 million and $97.6 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
$15.0 million increase was due in part to the addition of our fifth domestic distribution facility
in Ontario, California and its functional integration with the existing domestic distribution
facility, as well as increased sales volume.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of the following: salaries, wages and
related taxes, various overhead costs associated with our corporate staff, stock-based
compensation, domestic and international retail operations, non-selling related costs of our
international operations, costs associated with our domestic and European distribution centers,
professional fees related to both legal and accounting, insurance, and depreciation and
amortization, asset impairment, amongst other expenses. Our distribution network related costs are
included in general and administrative expenses and are not allocated to specific segments.
27
We believe that we have established our presence in most major domestic and international
retail markets. We opened 31 domestic retail stores and three international retail stores in 2008,
while closing two domestic stores. We currently plan to open between 15 and 18 domestic stores and
two international stores in 2009.
We continue to review our cost structure to bring our expenses in line with our anticipated
reduced sales levels in 2009.
Interest income
Interest income for 2008 decreased $2.7 million to $7.3 million as compared to $10.0 million
for the same period in 2007. The decrease in interest income resulted from lower interest rates
during 2008 when compared to the same period in 2007. Interest income earned on our investment
balances was primarily tax exempt.
Interest expense
Interest expense for 2008 decreased $0.2 million to $4.6 million as compared to $4.8 million
for the same period in 2007. Interest expense was incurred on mortgages on our distribution center
and our corporate office located in Manhattan Beach, California, and amounts owed to our foreign
manufacturers.
Other income (expense)
Other income, net was $0.1 million for both 2008 and 2007.
Income taxes
The effective tax rate for 2008 was 11.9% as compared to 36.0% in 2007. Income tax expense
for 2008 was $7.3 million compared to $42.6 million for 2007. On August 1, 2008, we received a
decision on our advance pricing agreement (APA) with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The
APA provides us with greater certainty with respect to the transfer pricing of certain intercompany
transactions. As a result of this agreement and other discrete items, we recorded an income tax
benefit of $7.0 million, or $0.15 per diluted share, relating to the reversal of income tax expense
recorded in prior years. Excluding the impact of these discrete items, our effective tax rate would
have been 23.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008. We expect our ongoing effective annual tax
rate in 2009 to be between 25 and 30 percent.
Income taxes were computed using the effective tax rates applicable to each of our domestic
and international taxable jurisdictions. The rate for the year ended December 31, 2008 is lower
than the expected domestic rate of approximately 40% due to our non-U.S. subsidiary earnings in
lower tax rate jurisdictions and our planned permanent reinvestment of undistributed earnings from
our non-U.S. subsidiaries, thereby indefinitely postponing their repatriation to the United States.
As such, we did not provide for deferred income taxes on accumulated undistributed earnings of our
non-U.S. subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2008, withholding and U.S. taxes have not been recorded
on approximately $64.1 million of cumulative undistributed earnings.
The APA obtained in 2008 provided for transfer pricing adjustments which resulted in the
reclassification of approximately $21.4 million of prior year earnings from the U.S. to non-U.S.
subsidiaries. If these reclassified earnings had been accounted for as non-U.S. earnings as of
December 31, 2007, the balance of accumulated undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries
for which withholding and U.S. taxes had not been recorded would have increased from $15.5 million
to $36.9 million.
Minority interest in net loss of consolidated subsidiary
Minority interest of $1.9 million for 2008 represents the share of net loss that is
attributable to the equity that we do not own of Skechers China, our joint venture that was formed
in October 2007.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 COMPARED TO THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
Net sales
Net sales for 2007 were $1.394 billion, an increase of $188.8 million, or 15.7%, over net
sales of $1.205 billion in 2006. The increase in net sales was due to increased international
wholesale sales, domestic wholesale sales, and retail sales primarily due to acceptance of new
designs and styles for our in-season product including sport fusion, casual fusion footwear and the
introduction of
28
our Cali Gear footwear. The increase in net sales was also due to growth within the domestic
retail segment from an increased store base as well as positive domestic and international
comparative store sales increases.
Our domestic wholesale segment increased 7.5%, or $58.3 million, to $831.2 million compared to
$772.9 million in 2006. The increase in domestic wholesale segment net sales came on an 8.7% unit
sales volume increase to 43.2 million pairs from 39.8 million pairs in 2006. The strongest
increases in domestic wholesale came in our Womens Active, Mens USA, and Kids lines, along with
the introduction of our Cali Gear line. Our average selling price per pair decreased 1.2% to
$19.22 from $19.44 in 2006.
Our international wholesale segment sales increased $83.9 million to $267.6 million in 2007, a
45.7% increase over sales of $183.7 million in 2006. Direct subsidiary sales increased $49.9
million, or 53.1%, to $144.0 million compared to net sales of $94.1 million in 2006. The increase
in direct subsidiary sales was primarily due to increased sales into UK, Canada, Benelux, and
Germany. Our distributor sales increased $34.0 million to $123.6 million in 2007, a 37.9% increase
over sales of $89.6 million in 2006. This was primarily due to increased sales to our distributors
in Russia, Panama, Serbia and Japan.
Our retail segment sales increased $42.0 million to $279.4 million in 2007, a 17.7% increase
over sales of $237.4 million in 2006. The increase in retail sales was due to a net increase of 36
domestic stores, increased sales across all three store formats and positive comparable store
sales. During 2007, we opened 42 new stores and closed three stores. These new stores contributed
$16.9 million in net sales during 2007 as compared to new store sales of $10.0 million for 22 other
stores opened in 2006. Of our new store additions, 28 were concept stores, 11 were outlet stores,
and three were warehouse stores. In addition, during 2007, we realized positive comparable store
sales increases in our domestic retail stores of 5.1% and 16.7% in our international retail stores.
Our domestic retail sales increased 17.5% due to positive comparable sales and having 22 retail
stores that were opened in 2006 being open the entire year in 2007. Our international retail sales
increased 20.2% in 2007 compared to 2006, due to increased comparable sales, the opening of three
additional stores, as well as favorable currency translation adjustments.
Our e-commerce sales increased $4.5 million to $15.9 million in 2007, a 40.2% increase over
sales of $11.4 million in 2006. Our
e-commerce sales made up 1% of our consolidated net sales in both 2007 and 2006.
Gross profit
Gross profit for 2007 increased $76.7 million to $600.0 million as compared to $523.3 million
in 2006. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales, or gross margin, decreased to 43.0% in 2007
from 43.4% in 2006. This gross margin decrease was the result of the decrease in domestic
wholesale margins and a decrease in retail margins to 61.5% in 2007 from 63.8% in 2006. This was
partially offset by the increase in international wholesale margins, which increased to 37.3% in
2007 from 35.4% in 2006.
Our domestic wholesale segment increased $19.2 million, or 6.4%, to $320.4 million in 2006
compared to $301.2 million in 2006. Domestic wholesale margins decreased to 38.5% in 2007 from
39.0% for 2006. The decrease in domestic wholesale margins was due to lower average selling prices
related to the introduction of our Cali Gear line and lower margins from closing out our
discontinued fashion brands.
Gross profit for our international wholesale segment increased $34.8 million, or 53.4%, to
$99.8 million for 2007 compared to $65.0 million in 2006. Gross margins were 37.3% for 2007
compared to 35.4% in 2006. Gross margins for our direct subsidiary sales were 45.0% in 2007 as
compared to 42.4% in 2006. Gross margins for our distributor sales were 28.2% in 2007 as compared
to 28.1% in 2006. The increase in gross margins for the international wholesale segment was due to
increased subsidiary sales, which achieve higher gross margins than our international wholesale
sales through our foreign distributors.
Gross profit for our retail segment increased $20.4 million, or 13.4%, to $171.8 million in
2007 as compared to $151.4 million in 2006. This increase in gross profit was due to 22 stores
that were opened in 2006 being open the entire year in 2007 and positive comparable store sales
increases of 16.7% and 5.1% in our international and domestic stores, respectively. During 2007,
we opened 38 new domestic stores, and closed two other domestic stores. Gross margins decreased to
61.5% in 2007 as compared to 63.8% in 2006. Again, the decrease in margins was due to lower
average selling prices related to the introduction of our Cali Gear line and lower margins from
closing out our discontinued fashion brands.
29
Selling expenses
Selling expenses increased by $16.6 million, or 15.1%, to $126.5 million for 2007 from $109.9
million in 2006. As a percentage of net sales, selling expenses were 9.1% in 2007 and 2006. The
increase in selling expenses was primarily due to increased television and print advertising of
$14.5 million and increased promotional costs of $2.4 million due to the launch of our Cali Gear
line.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $59.7 million, or 19.6%, to $364.7 million
for 2007 from $305.0 million in 2006. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative
expenses were 26.2% and 25.3% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in general and
administrative expenses was primarily due to increased salaries and wages of $19.3 million, which
includes stock compensation costs of $1.1 million, higher rent expense of $8.5 million due to the
opening of 42 retail stores, and increased warehouse and distribution costs of $8.2 million and
increased temporary help of $5.1 million due to increased sales and the addition of another
domestic distribution facility. In addition, the expenses related to our distribution network,
including the functions of purchasing, receiving, inspecting, allocating, warehousing and packaging
of our products totaled $97.6 million and $77.6 million for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The $20.0
million increase was due in part to the addition of our fifth domestic distribution facility in
Ontario, California and its functional integration with the existing domestic distribution
facility, as well as increased sales volume.
Interest income
Interest income for 2007 increased $1.6 million to $10.0 million as compared to $8.4 million
for the same period in 2006. The increase in interest income resulted from higher average cash and
investment balances during 2007 when compared to the same period in 2006 and interest received on a
legal settlement in 2007. Interest income earned on our short-term investment balances was
primarily tax exempt.
Interest expense
Interest expense for 2007 decreased $4.4 million to $4.8 million as compared to $9.2 million
for the same period in 2006. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the conversion
of our 4.5% convertible subordinated notes to shares of our Class A common stock on or prior to
February 20, 2007. Interest expense was incurred on mortgages on our distribution center and our
corporate office located in Manhattan Beach, California, and amounts owed to our foreign
manufacturers.
Other income (expense)
Other income, net for 2007 decreased $0.9 million to $0.1 million as compared to $1.0 million
for the same period in 2006. The decrease in other income was mainly due to foreign currency
losses.
Income taxes
The effective tax rate for 2007 was 36.0% as compared to 37.0% in 2006. Income tax expense
for 2007 was $42.6 million compared to $41.7 million for 2006. Income taxes were computed using
the effective tax rates applicable to each of our domestic and international taxable jurisdictions.
The rate for the year ended December 31, 2007 is lower than the expected domestic rate of
approximately 40% due to our non-U.S. subsidiary earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions and our
planned permanent reinvestment of undistributed earnings from our non-U.S. subsidiaries, thereby
indefinitely postponing their repatriation to the United States. As such, we did not provide for
deferred income taxes on accumulated undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries. As of
December 31, 2007, withholding and U.S. taxes have not been recorded on approximately $15.5 million
of cumulative undistributed earnings.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our working capital at December 31, 2008 was $413.8 million, a decrease of $110.1 million from
working capital of $523.9 million at December 31, 2007. Our cash and cash equivalents at December
31, 2008 were $114.9 million compared to $199.5 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease in cash
and cash equivalents of $84.6 million was primarily due to capital expenditures of $72.5 million
and an increased inventory balance of $58.2 million that were partially offset by our net earnings
of $55.4 million.
As a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets,
periodic auctions for our auction rate securities have failed since mid-February 2008. A failed
auction is not necessarily an indication of an increased credit risk or a
30
reduction in the underlying collateral; however, we will not be able to liquidate the
investments until a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside the auction process, the
securities are called or refinanced by the issuer, or the securities mature. Accordingly, there is
no assurance that future auctions will succeed or that other events will occur to provide
liquidity. As a result, our ability to liquidate our investments in the near term may be limited
or may not exist and thus our auction rate securities are classified as long-term investments as of
December 31, 2008. In connection with this classification, we recorded a $13.7 million unrealized
loss on these securities based on what we believe is a temporary decline in value. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, issuers refinanced $14.0 million of our preferred stock investments at par
value.
We determined that there were no observable market transactions for which to determine the
fair value of these securities, nor was there a consistent methodology employed by broker-dealers
to provide values to their clients for these investments. Consequently, we estimated the fair
value of our holdings of these securities based on a calculated discount using internal assumptions
and limited market data as well as ongoing plans announced by certain issuers to partially redeem
or attempt to restore liquidity to these securities and whether any of these efforts will be
successful. We calculated a discount of $13.7 million, of which $3.8 million, or approximately 4.9%
of the par value, related to our investment in auction rate preferred stocks, and $9.9 million, or
approximately 52% of the par value, related to our investment in auction rate Dividend Received
Deduction (DRD) preferred securities. Our valuation is highly subjective and could change
significantly based on the various assumptions used.
The auction rate securities that we hold were purchased from Wachovia Securities. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, Wachovia Securities announced that it had agreed to a settlement with
state and federal regulators whereby it would repurchase all of the auction rate securities it had
sold to clients prior to the collapse of the auction rate market in February 2008. We believe that
all of our auction rate securities are subject to this settlement and, as a result, expect to
receive an offer to repurchase these securities between June 10, 2009 and June 30, 2009. Until
such time as (a) the formal offer is received and Wachovia repurchases these securities, (b) they
are redeemed by the issuer(s), or (c) they can be sold at par value, we intend to consider these
securities as available for sale securities and classify them as long-term assets. In the
meantime, the issuers of these securities continue to make interest payments at specified default
rates. We believe our operating cash flows, existing cash balances and credit facilities will
provide sufficient liquidity for our ongoing operations and growth initiatives.
During 2008, net cash used in our operating activities was $21.8 million compared to cash
provided by operating activities of $101.4 million for 2007. The significant decrease in our
operating cash flows for 2008 when compared to 2007 was mainly the result of a large increase in
our inventory in 2008 compared to 2007. This can be attributed to the weak retail environment
toward the end of 2008, which led to a higher level of cancellations, returns, decreases in open to
buy and at-once orders and reduced demand stemming from a number of retail bankruptcies and going
out of business sales. Due to these events, we began to manage our inventory levels down at
reduced prices in late 2008, which is continuing into 2009.
Net cash used in investing activities was $68.2 million for 2008 as compared to $75.7 million
in 2007. During 2008, we sold or had redeemed $20.6 million of long-term investments which was
partially offset by purchases of $11.7 million. During 2008, we purchased selected assets of Nunez
& Rothman Enterprises, Inc., dba Punkrose (Punkrose) a designer and developer of specialty
footwear located in the City of Industry in California. The purchase included certain inventories
and equipment for a cash payment of approximately $4.6 million. Capital expenditures for 2008 were
approximately $72.5 million, which primarily consisted of 34 new store openings and several store
remodels, corporate real property purchased, and warehouse equipment for our new distribution
center in Moreno Valley, California. This was compared to capital expenditures of $31.2 million in
the prior year, which primarily related to construction of our new corporate headquarters, new
store openings and remodels and warehouse equipment upgrades. Excluding the construction of our
new distribution center in Moreno Valley, California, we expect our capital expenditures for 2009
to be approximately $25 million, which includes opening between 15 to 18 domestic retail stores and
two international retail stores as well as investments in information technology. We are currently
in the process of designing and purchasing the equipment and tenant improvements to be used in our
new distribution center and estimate the cost of this equipment and tenant improvements to be
approximately $85.0 million, of which $23.1 million was incurred as of December 31, 2008. We expect
the remaining balance of approximately $62.0 million to be incurred during 2009. Our operating
cash flows, current cash, and available lines of credit should be adequate to fund these capital
expenditures, although we may seek additional funding for all of a portion of these expenditures.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $8.6 million during 2008 compared to net cash
provided by financing activities of $9.9 million during 2007. The decrease in cash provided by
financing activities was due to lower proceeds from the issuance of Class A common stock upon the
exercise of stock options during the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year
which was partially offset by a $5.0 million capital contribution by the minority partner to our
joint venture.
31
In April 2002, we issued $90.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% convertible
subordinated notes due April 15, 2007. On January 19, 2007, we called these notes for redemption.
The redemption date was February 20, 2007. The aggregate principal amount of notes outstanding was
$90.0 million. Holders of $89.969 million principal amount of the notes converted their notes into
shares of our Class A common stock prior to the redemption date, which included $2.5 million of
principal amount of the notes held by us. As a result of these conversions, 3,464,594 shares of
Class A common stock were issued to holders of the notes, which included 96,272 shares issued to us
that were immediately retired. In connection with these conversions, we paid approximately $500 in
cash to holders who elected to convert their notes, which represented cash paid in lieu of
fractional shares. In addition, we paid approximately $32,000 to holders who redeemed their notes,
which represented the redemption price of 100.9% of $31,000 principal amount of the notes plus
accrued interest.
We have outstanding debt of $16.8 million that primarily relates to notes payable for one of
our distribution center warehouses and one of our administrative offices, which notes are secured
by the respective properties.
On May 31, 2006, we amended our secured line of credit, which permits our company and certain
of our subsidiaries to borrow up to $150.0 million based upon eligible accounts receivable and
inventory, which line of credit can be increased to $250.0 million at our request, if the lenders
agree to such increase. Borrowings bear interest at the borrowers election based on either the
prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Prime rate loans will bear interest at a
rate equal to JPMorgan Chase Banks publicly announced prime rate less up to 0.50%. LIBOR loans
will bear interest at a rate equal to the applicable LIBOR plus up to an additional 1.75%. We pay
a monthly unused line of credit fee of 0.25% per annum. The loan agreement, which expires on May
31, 2011, provides for the issuance of letters of credit up to a maximum of $30.0 million. The
loan agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for secured credit facilities
of this type, including a financial covenant requiring a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less
than 1.1 at the end of each quarter if excess availability of eligible account receivable and
inventory is less than $50.0 million at any time during such quarter. Excess availability was not
less than $50.0 million during the year-ended December 31, 2008; hence, the fixed charge ratio
requirement was not applicable at such date. No amounts were outstanding and we were in compliance
with all other covenants of the loan agreement at December 31, 2008. We had $2.9 million of
outstanding letters of credit as December 31, 2008.
We believe that anticipated cash flows from operations, available borrowings under our secured
line of credit, cash on hand, investments and our financing arrangements will be sufficient to
provide us with the liquidity necessary to fund our anticipated working capital and capital
requirements through 2009. However, in connection with our current strategies, we will have
significant working capital requirements and will incur significant capital expenditures. Our
future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, costs
associated with moving to a new distribution facility, the levels at which we maintain inventory,
the market acceptance of our footwear, the success of our international operations, the levels of
promotion and advertising required to promote our footwear, the extent to which we invest in new
product design and improvements to our existing product design, acquisition of other brands or
companies, and the number and timing of new store openings. To the extent that available funds are
insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or
private financing of debt or equity. We cannot be assured that additional financing will be
available or that, if available, it can be obtained on terms favorable to our stockholders and us.
Failure to obtain such financing could delay or prevent our planned expansion, which could
adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if
additional capital is raised through the sale of additional equity or convertible securities,
dilution to our stockholders could occur.
32
DISCLOSURE ABOUT CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
The following table aggregates all material contractual obligations and commercial commitments as
of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period (In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
One to |
|
|
Three to |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One |
|
|
Three |
|
|
Five |
|
|
Five |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
Other long-term debt |
|
$ |
19,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
|
$ |
17,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations (1) |
|
|
549,077 |
|
|
|
67,849 |
|
|
|
138,471 |
|
|
$ |
102,352 |
|
|
$ |
240,405 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
166,896 |
|
|
|
166,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction contract |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warehousing equipment (3) |
|
|
61,884 |
|
|
|
61,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum payments related to our
licensing arrangements |
|
|
7,145 |
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,933 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
805,237 |
|
|
$ |
300,965 |
|
|
$ |
156,107 |
|
|
$ |
105,285 |
|
|
$ |
242,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating lease obligations consists primarily of real property leases for our retail
stores, corporate offices and distribution centers. These leases frequently include options
that permit us to extend beyond the terms of the initial fixed term. Payments for these
lease terms are provided for by cash flows generated from operations or, if needed, by our
$150.0 million secured line of credit, for which no amounts were outstanding at December
31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations include the following: (i) accounts payable balances for the
purchase of footwear of $79.6 million, (ii) outstanding letters of credit of $2.9 million
and (iii) open purchase commitments with our foreign manufacturers for $84.4 million. We
currently expect to fund these commitments with cash flows from operations and cash on
hand. |
|
(3) |
|
We plan to spend approximately $85.0 million for equipment relating to our new
warehouse in Moreno Valley, of which $23.1 million was incurred as of December 31, 2008.
We expect the remaining balance to be incurred in 2009, which we expect to fund with cash
flows from operations, investment balances and existing cash balances. |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships such
as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities that would have
been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance-sheet arrangements or for other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity,
market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND USE OF ESTIMATES
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make difficult, subjective and complex estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities.
We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, other available information, and
on other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. In
determining whether an estimate is critical, we consider if the nature of the estimates or
assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment or the susceptibility of
such matters to change, and if the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition
or operating performance is material. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting estimates are affected by significant judgments
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements: revenue recognition, allowance
for bad debts, returns, sales allowances and customer chargebacks, inventory write-downs, valuation
of long-lived assets, litigation reserves, valuation of deferred income taxes, uncertain tax
positions, foreign currency translation and stock-based compensation.
33
Revenue Recognition. We derive income from the sale of footwear and royalties earned from
licensing the Skechers brand. Domestically, goods are shipped Free on Board (FOB) shipping point
directly from our domestic distribution center in Ontario, California. For our international
wholesale customers in the European community, product is shipped FOB shipping point direct from
our distribution center in Liege, Belgium. For our distributor sales, the goods are generally
delivered directly from the independent factories to our distributors freight forwarders on a Free
Named Carrier (FCA) basis. We recognize revenue on wholesale sales when products are shipped and
the customer takes title and assumes risk of loss, collection of relevant receivable is probable,
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable. This
generally occurs at time of shipment. While customers do not have the right to return goods, we
periodically decide to accept returns or provide customers with credits.
Allowances for estimated returns, discounts, doubtful accounts and chargebacks are provided
for when related revenue is recorded. Related costs paid to third-party shipping companies are
recorded as a cost of sales. We recognize revenue from retail sales at the point of sale.
Royalty income is earned from our licensing arrangements. Upon signing a new licensing
agreement, we receive up-front fees, which are generally characterized as prepaid royalties. These
fees are initially deferred and recognized as revenue as earned (i.e., as licensed sales are
reported to the company or on a straight line basis over the term of the agreement). The first
calculated royalty payment is based on actual sales of the licensed product or, in some cases
minimum royalty payments. Typically, at each quarter end we receive correspondence from our
licensees indicating what the actual sales for the period were. This information is used to
calculate and accrue the related royalties currently receivable based on the terms of the
agreement.
Allowance for bad debts, returns, sales allowances and customer chargebacks. We provide a
reserve against our receivables for estimated losses that may result from our customers inability
to pay. To minimize the likelihood of uncollectibility, customers credit-worthiness is reviewed
periodically based on external credit reporting services, financial statements issued by the
customer and our experience with the account, and it is adjusted accordingly. When a customers
account becomes significantly past due, we generally place a hold on the account and discontinue
further shipments to that customer, minimizing further risk of loss. We determine the amount of the
reserve by analyzing known uncollectible accounts, aged receivables, economic conditions in the
customers countries or industries, historical losses and our customers credit-worthiness. Amounts
later determined and specifically identified to be uncollectible are charged or written off against
this reserve.
We also reserve for potential disputed amounts or chargebacks from our customers. Our
chargeback reserve is based on a collectibility percentage based on factors such as historical
trends, current economic conditions, and nature of the chargeback receivables. We also reserve for
potential sales returns and allowances based on historical trends.
The likelihood of a material loss on an uncollectible account would be mainly dependent on
deterioration in the overall economic conditions in a particular country or environment. Reserves
are fully provided for all probable losses of this nature. For receivables that are not
specifically identified as high risk, we provide a reserve based upon our historical loss rate as a
percentage of sales. Gross trade accounts receivable balance was $189.9 million and $177.7
million and the allowance for bad debts, returns, sales allowances and customer chargebacks was
$14.9 million and $10.3 million, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Inventory write-downs. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. We review our
inventory on a regular basis for excess and slow moving inventory. Our review is based on inventory
on hand, prior sales and our expected net realizable value. Our analysis includes a review of
inventory quantities on hand at period end in relation to year-to-date sales, existing orders from
customers and projections for sales in the near future. The net realizable value, or market value,
is determined based on our estimate of sales prices of such inventory based upon historical sales
experience on a style by style basis. A write-down of inventory is considered permanent and creates
a new cost basis for those units. The likelihood of any material inventory write-down is dependent
primarily on our expectation of future consumer demand for our product. A misinterpretation or
misunderstanding of future consumer demand for our product or of the economy, or other failure to
estimate correctly, could result in inventory valuation changes, either favorably or unfavorably,
compared to the requirement determined to be appropriate as of the balance sheet date. Our gross
inventory value was $274.4 million and $206.1 million and our inventory reserve was $13.2 million
and $1.9 million, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Valuation of long-lived assets. When circumstances warrant, we assess the impairment of
long-lived assets that require us to make assumptions and judgments regarding the carrying value of
these assets. The assets are considered to be impaired if we determine that the carrying value may
not be recoverable based upon our assessment of the following events or changes in circumstances:
34
|
|
|
the assets ability to continue to generate income; |
|
|
|
|
any loss of legal ownership or title to the asset(s); |
|
|
|
|
any significant changes in our strategic business objectives and utilization of the
asset(s); or |
|
|
|
|
the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends. |
If the assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment we recognize is the amount by
which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. In addition, we base
the useful lives and related amortization or depreciation expense on our estimate of the period
that the assets will generate revenues or otherwise be used by us. If a change were to occur in any
of the above-mentioned factors or estimates, the likelihood of a material change in our reported
results would increase. In addition, we prepare a summary of store contribution from our domestic
retail stores to assess potential impairment of the fixed assets and leasehold improvements. Stores
with negative contribution opened in excess of twenty-four months are then reviewed in detail to
determine if impairment exists. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a $1.7 million
impairment charge for eight of our domestic stores. We did not record an impairment charge in 2007
or 2006.
Litigation reserves. Estimated amounts for claims that are probable and can be reasonably
estimated are recorded as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. The likelihood of a
material change in these estimated reserves would depend on new claims as they may arise and the
favorable or unfavorable outcome of the particular litigation. Both the amount and range of loss on
a large portion of the remaining pending litigation is uncertain. As such, we are unable to make a
reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from unfavorable outcomes in litigation. As
additional information becomes available, we will assess the potential liability related to our
pending litigation and revise our estimates. Such revisions in our estimates of the potential
liability could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Valuation of deferred income taxes. We record a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce
our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The likelihood
of a material change in our expected realization of our deferred tax assets depends on future
taxable income and the effectiveness of our tax planning strategies amongst the various domestic
and international tax jurisdictions in which we operate. We evaluate our projections of taxable
income to determine the recoverability of our deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation
allowance. As of December 31, 2008, we had net deferred tax assets of $34.0 million reduced by a
valuation allowance of $3.9 million against loss carry-forwards not expected to be utilized by
certain foreign subsidiaries.
Uncertain tax positions. Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109), which
contains a two-step process for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to determine whether or not a tax benefit should
be recognized. A tax benefit will be recognized if the weight of available evidence indicates that
the tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax
authorities, assuming the tax authorities have full knowledge of all the relevant information. The
second step is to measure the tax benefit of those tax positions meeting the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold. The tax benefit is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is more
than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authorities. The
recognition and measurement of benefits related to our tax positions requires significant judgment
as uncertainties often exist with respect to new laws, new interpretations of existing laws, and
rulings by taxing authorities. Upon adoption, we recognized approximately a $3.4 million increase
in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as a reduction to the
January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings.
Foreign currency translation. Our international operations generally use their respective
local currencies as their functional currency. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation (SFAS 52), revenues and expenses from our
international subsidiaries are translated using the monthly average exchange rates in effect for
the period in which such revenues and expenses occur. International subsidiaries that use their
local currency as their functional currency translate their assets and liabilities using current
rates of exchange at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation gains and losses for such
subsidiaries are included within accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of
stockholders equity. One international subsidiary has a functional currency of the U.S. dollar.
Resulting remeasurement gains and losses from this subsidiary are included in the determination of
net earnings. A substantial portion of our intercompany loans are considered long-term investments
and the gains or losses from currency fluctuations are included as a component of translation
adjustment in other comprehensive income.
35
Stock-based compensation. Beginning on January 1, 2006, we implemented and adopted a new
critical accounting policy, Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment (SFAS 123(R)), which requires us to recognize compensation for stock options, nonvested
shares and employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) shares at fair value. Under the fair value
recognition provisions for SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant
date based on the fair value of the awards expected to vest and recognized as expense ratably over
the requisite service period of the award. We have used the Black-Scholes valuation model to
estimate the fair value of our stock option awards, which requires various judgmental assumptions
including estimating stock price volatility, forfeiture rates, and expected life. Our computation
of expected volatility is based on historical volatility. In addition, we consider many factors
when estimating expected forfeitures and expected life, including types of awards, employee class,
and historical experience. If any of the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model change
significantly, stock-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that
recorded in the current period. We adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method which
requires the application of the accounting standard as of January 1, 2006. Stock compensation
expense as a result of SFAS 123(R) was recorded to general and administrative expenses and was $2.3
million, $1.1 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. In accordance with the modified prospective method, the consolidated financial
statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of
SFAS 123(R).
INFLATION
We do not believe that the relatively moderate rates of inflation experienced in the United
States over the last three years have had a significant effect on our sales or profitability.
However, we cannot accurately predict the effect of inflation on future operating results. Although
higher rates of inflation have been experienced in a number of foreign countries in which our
products are manufactured, we do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our sales
or profitability. While we have been able to offset our foreign product cost increases by
increasing prices or changing suppliers in the past, we cannot assure you that we will be able to
continue to make such increases or changes in the future.
EXCHANGE RATES
We receive U.S. dollars for substantially all of our product sales and our royalty income.
Inventory purchases from offshore contract manufacturers are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars;
however, purchase prices for our products may be impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rate
between the U.S. dollar and the local currencies of the contract manufacturers, which may have the
effect of increasing our cost of goods in the future. During 2008 and 2007, exchange rate
fluctuations did not have a material impact on our inventory costs. We do not engage in hedging
activities with respect to such exchange rate risk.
FUTURE ACCOUNTING CHANGES
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 162, The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources
of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of
financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This
statement shall be effective 60 days following the Securities Exchange and Commissions approval of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present
Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not expect that the
adoption of SFAS 162 will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB-14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That
May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP APB-14-1). FSP
APB 14-1 clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion
(including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14,
Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. Additionally, this
FSP specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and
equity components in a manner that will reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate
when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This FSP is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of
this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements; however, we do not expect that the adoption
of FSP APB-14-1 will have a material impact on our previously reported financial condition or
results of operations.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). This Statement requires
enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities, including (a) how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
36
are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 133), and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our
Consolidated Financial Statements; however, we do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 161 will
have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Accounting for Noncontrolling Interests (SFAS
160), which clarifies the classification of noncontrolling interests in consolidated statements of
financial position and the accounting for and reporting of transactions between the reporting
entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. SFAS 160 will be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our
Consolidated Financial Statements; however, we expect that the adoption of SFAS 160 will have an
impact on our financial condition and results of operations, however, we do not believe that impact
to be material.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) Applying the Acquisition Method (SFAS
141(R)), which clarifies the accounting for a business combination and requires an acquirer to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. SFAS 141(R) will
be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the
impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements; however, we do not expect that
the adoption of SFAS 141(R) will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
MARKET RISK
Market risk is the potential loss arising from the adverse changes in market rates and prices,
such as interest rates, marketable debt security prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
Changes in interest rates, marketable debt security prices and changes in foreign currency exchange
rates have and will have an impact on our results of operations. We do not hold any derivative
securities that require fair value presentation under FASB Statement No. 133.
Market risk and interest rate fluctuations. Our investments consist of corporate and
municipal debt and preferred stock auction rate securities. Recently, several auctions for our
investments in auction rate securities have failed as a result of illiquidity and imbalance in
order flow. A failed auction is not an indication of an increased credit risk or a reduction in
the underlying collateral; however, parties wishing to sell securities could not do so. Based on
current market conditions, it is not known when or if the capital markets will come back into
balance to achieve successful auctions for these securities. If these auctions continue to fail,
it could result in our holding securities beyond their next scheduled auction reset dates and will
limit the short-term liquidity of these investments. We currently believe these securities are not
significantly impaired, primarily due to the collateral underlying these securities and/or the
creditworthiness of the issuer; however, we have calculated a discount of $13.7 million, of which
$3.8 million, or approximately 4.9% of the par value, related to our investments in auction rate
preferred stocks, and $9.9 million, or approximately 52% of the par value, related to our
investments in auction rate DRD preferred securities. Based on our expected operating cash flows,
and our other sources and uses of cash, we do not anticipate that the potential lack of liquidity
on these investments will affect our ability to execute our current business plan.
The interest rate charged on our line of credit facility is based on either the prime rate of
interest or the LIBOR, and changes in the either of these rates of interest could have an effect on
the interest charged on our outstanding balances. At December 31, 2008, no amounts were
outstanding that were subject to changes in interest rates.
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations. We face market risk to the extent that changes in foreign
currency exchange rates affect our non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiarys
revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. In addition, changes in foreign exchange rates may
affect the value of our inventory commitments. Also, inventory purchases of our products may be
impacted by fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the local currencies of
the contract manufacturers, which could have the effect of increasing the cost of goods sold in the
future. We manage these risks by primarily denominating these purchases and commitments in U.S.
dollars. We do not currently engage in hedging activities with respect to such exchange rate risks.
37
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
38
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008. In connection with our audits of the consolidated
financial statements, we also have audited the related financial statement schedule. These
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007
the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), Skechers U.S.A. Inc.s, internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our
report dated March 2, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 2, 2009
39
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.:
We have audited Skechers U.S.A., Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Skechers U.S.A.,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. maintained in all material respects effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the related financial statement schedule, and our
report dated March 2, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 2, 2009
40
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
114,941 |
|
|
$ |
199,516 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104,500 |
|
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $14,880 in 2008 and $10,284 in 2007 |
|
|
175,064 |
|
|
|
167,406 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
7,816 |
|
|
|
10,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables |
|
|
182,880 |
|
|
|
177,926 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
261,209 |
|
|
|
204,211 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
31,022 |
|
|
|
13,993 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
11,955 |
|
|
|
8,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
602,007 |
|
|
|
708,740 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
157,757 |
|
|
|
98,400 |
|
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization |
|
|
5,407 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
13,983 |
|
Long-term marketable securities |
|
|
81,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, at cost |
|
|
11,062 |
|
|
|
6,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
876,316 |
|
|
$ |
827,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current installments of long-term borrowings |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
164,643 |
|
|
|
164,466 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
23,021 |
|
|
|
19,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
188,236 |
|
|
|
184,852 |
|
Long-term borrowings, excluding current installments |
|
|
16,188 |
|
|
|
16,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
204,424 |
|
|
|
201,314 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $.001 par value; 10,000 authorized; none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 33,410 and
32,992 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Class B Common Stock, $.001 par value; 60,000 shares authorized; 12,782 and
12,852 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
264,200 |
|
|
|
258,084 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(4,719 |
) |
|
|
14,763 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
409,166 |
|
|
|
353,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
668,693 |
|
|
|
626,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
876,316 |
|
|
$ |
827,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,440,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,205,368 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
844,821 |
|
|
|
794,192 |
|
|
|
682,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
595,922 |
|
|
|
599,989 |
|
|
|
523,346 |
|
Royalty income, net |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
|
4,179 |
|
|
|
4,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
598,383 |
|
|
|
604,168 |
|
|
|
527,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling |
|
|
126,890 |
|
|
|
126,527 |
|
|
|
109,886 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
413,601 |
|
|
|
364,711 |
|
|
|
305,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,491 |
|
|
|
491,238 |
|
|
|
414,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
57,892 |
|
|
|
112,930 |
|
|
|
112,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
7,337 |
|
|
|
10,040 |
|
|
|
8,351 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4,606 |
) |
|
|
(4,763 |
) |
|
|
(9,227 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
|
5,375 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before taxes and minority interest |
|
|
60,743 |
|
|
|
118,305 |
|
|
|
112,648 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
7,258 |
|
|
|
42,619 |
|
|
|
41,654 |
|
Minority interest in loss of consolidated subsidiary |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
55,396 |
|
|
$ |
75,686 |
|
|
$ |
70,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
46,031 |
|
|
|
45,262 |
|
|
|
41,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
46,708 |
|
|
|
46,741 |
|
|
|
46,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
|
AMOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCUMULATED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLASS A |
|
|
CLASS B |
|
|
CLASS A |
|
|
CLASS B |
|
|
ADDITIONAL |
|
|
OTHER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
COMMON |
|
|
COMMON |
|
|
COMMON |
|
|
COMMON |
|
|
PAID-IN |
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE |
|
|
RETAINED |
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
|
STOCK |
|
|
STOCK |
|
|
STOCK |
|
|
STOCK |
|
|
CAPITAL |
|
|
INCOME |
|
|
EARNINGS |
|
|
EQUITY |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
23,382 |
|
|
|
16,651 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
126,274 |
|
|
$ |
7,039 |
|
|
$ |
210,477 |
|
|
$ |
343,830 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,994 |
|
|
|
70,994 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under the employee stock
purchase plan |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under the employee stock option
plan |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,055 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,110 |
|
Conversion of Class B Common Stock
into Class A Common Stock |
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
28,103 |
|
|
|
13,768 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
156,374 |
|
|
$ |
11,200 |
|
|
$ |
281,471 |
|
|
$ |
449,087 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,686 |
|
|
|
75,686 |
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting
change adjustment to retained
earnings upon adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,387 |
) |
|
|
(3,387 |
) |
Redemption of convertible
subordinated notes |
|
|
3,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,746 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under the employee stock
purchase plan |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under the employee stock option
plan |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,127 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
Conversion of Class B Common Stock
into Class A Common Stock |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
(916 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
32,992 |
|
|
|
12,852 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
258,084 |
|
|
$ |
14,763 |
|
|
$ |
353,770 |
|
|
$ |
626,663 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,396 |
|
|
|
55,396 |
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,151 |
) |
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
( 11,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under the employee stock
purchase plan |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock under the employee stock option
plan |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
Tax benefit of stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
Conversion of Class B Common Stock
into Class A Common Stock |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
33,410 |
|
|
|
12,782 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
264,200 |
|
|
$ |
(4,719 |
) |
|
$ |
409,166 |
|
|
$ |
668,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
43
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
55,396 |
|
|
$ |
75,686 |
|
|
$ |
70,994 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
|
|
17,069 |
|
|
|
17,220 |
|
|
|
16,203 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
Provision for bad debts and returns |
|
|
10,787 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
4,144 |
|
Non cash stock compensation |
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
2,030 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,988 |
) |
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
(6,382 |
) |
Loss on disposal of equipment |
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
(Increase) decrease in assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(27,462 |
) |
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
(47,994 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(58,240 |
) |
|
|
(3,045 |
) |
|
|
(64,364 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(17,609 |
) |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(6,221 |
) |
|
|
(1,671 |
) |
|
|
1,340 |
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
49,563 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
(3,005 |
) |
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided (used in) by operating activities |
|
|
(21,829 |
) |
|
|
101,355 |
|
|
|
26,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(72,461 |
) |
|
|
(31,175 |
) |
|
|
(27,560 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(11,725 |
) |
|
|
(249,450 |
) |
|
|
(113,100 |
) |
Maturities of investments |
|
|
20,600 |
|
|
|
204,950 |
|
|
|
53,100 |
|
Cash paid for acquisitions |
|
|
(4,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(68,226 |
) |
|
|
(75,675 |
) |
|
|
(87,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the issuances of stock through employee
stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock options |
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
8,193 |
|
|
|
18,963 |
|
Contribution from minority interest holder of consolidated entity |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
4,966 |
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
(1,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
8,557 |
|
|
|
9,911 |
|
|
|
22,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(81,498 |
) |
|
|
35,591 |
|
|
|
(38,600 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,077 |
) |
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
199,516 |
|
|
|
160,485 |
|
|
|
197,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
114,941 |
|
|
$ |
199,516 |
|
|
$ |
160,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
4,902 |
|
|
$ |
4,714 |
|
|
$ |
8,560 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
17,834 |
|
|
|
41,481 |
|
|
|
47,064 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
The Company issued approximately 3.5 million shares of Class A common stock to note holders
upon conversion of our 4.50% convertible subordinated debt with a carrying value of $89,969 during
the year ended December 31, 2007.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) The Company
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (the Company) designs, develops, markets and distributes footwear. The
Company also operates retail stores and an e-commerce business.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
(b) Use of Estimates
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to
prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates relate
primarily to the revenue recognition, allowance for bad debts, returns, sales allowances and
customer chargebacks, inventory write-downs, valuation of long-lived assets, litigation reserves,
valuation of deferred income taxes, uncertain tax positions, foreign currency translation and
stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(c) Minority interest
Minority interest in the Companys consolidated financial statements results from the
accounting for a noncontrolling interest in a consolidated subsidiary or affiliate. Minority
interest represents a partially-owned subsidiarys or consolidated affiliates income, losses, and
components of other comprehensive income which is attributable to the noncontrolling parties
interests. The Company has a 50 percent interest in Skechers China Limited (Skechers China), a
joint venture which was formed in October 2007, and made an initial cash capital contribution of
$5.0 million and also contributed the net assets of its retail operation in China in the amount of
$0.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our joint venture partner also made a
corresponding cash capital contribution during the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company
consolidates this joint venture into its financial statements because it has control of the board
of directors. Minority interest of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 represents
the share of net loss that is attributable to the equity of Skechers China that we do not own.
Transactions between Skechers China and Skechers have been eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements.
(d) Business Segment Information
Skechers operations and segments are organized along its distribution channels and consists of
the following: domestic wholesale, international wholesale, retail and e-commerce sales.
Information regarding these segments is summarized in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(e) Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue on wholesale sales when products are shipped and the customer
takes ownership and assumes risk of loss, collection of the relevant receivable is probable,
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable. This
generally occurs at the time of shipment. Allowances for estimated returns, sales allowances,
discounts, doubtful accounts and chargebacks are provided for when related revenue is recorded.
Related costs paid to third-party shipping companies are recorded as a cost of sales. The Company
recognizes revenue from retail sales at the point of sale.
Net royalty income is earned from our licensing arrangements. Upon signing a new licensing
agreement, we receive up-front fees, which are generally characterized as prepaid royalties. These
fees are initially deferred and recognized as revenue as earned based on the terms of the contract
(i.e. as licensed sales are reported to the company or on a straight line basis over the term of
the agreement). The first calculated royalty payment is based on actual sales of the licensed
product. Typically, at each quarter end we receive correspondence from our licensees indicating
what the actual sales for the period were. This information is used to calculate and accrue the
related royalties based on the terms of the agreement.
45
(f) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of certificates of deposit with an initial term of
less than three months. For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company
considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be
cash equivalents.
(g) Investments
In general, investments with original maturities of greater than three months and remaining
maturities of less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Highly liquid
investments with maturities beyond one year may also be classified as short-term based on their
liquidity, managements intentions and because such marketable securities represent the investment
of cash that is available for current operations. Long-term investments consist of auction rate
securities, which are corporate and municipal debt securities and preferred stocks which have
underlying long-term maturities or preferred equity.
Since February 2008, as a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and
capital markets, periodic auctions for the Companys auction rate securities have failed. As a
result of these failed auctions, the interest rates on the investments reset to specified default
rates. A failed auction is not necessarily an indication of increased credit risk or a reduction
in the underlying collateral; however, the Company will not be able to liquidate the investments
until a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside the auction process, the securities are
called or refinanced by the issuer, or the securities mature. Accordingly, there is no assurance
that future auctions will succeed or that other events will occur to provide liquidity, and as a
result, our ability to liquidate our investments in the near term may be limited or may not exist.
(h) Foreign Currency Translation
In accordance with SFAS 52, certain international operations use the respective local
currencies as their functional currency, while other international operations use the U.S. Dollar
as their functional currency. The Company considers the U.S. dollar as its functional currency.
The Company operates internationally through several foreign subsidiaries. Translation adjustments
for these subsidiaries are included in other comprehensive income. Additionally, one international
subsidiary, Skechers S.a.r.l. located in Switzerland, operates with a functional currency of the
U.S. dollar. Resulting remeasurement gains and losses from this subsidiary are included in the
determination of net earnings (loss). Assets and liabilities of the foreign operations denominated
in local currencies are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date. Revenues and
expenses are translated at the weighted average rate of exchange during the period. Translation of
intercompany loans of a long-term investment nature are included as a component of translation
adjustment in other comprehensive income.
(i) Inventories
Inventories, principally finished goods, are stated at the lower of cost (based on the
first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company provides for estimated losses from obsolete or
slow-moving inventories and writes down the cost of inventory at the time such determinations are
made. Reserves are estimated based upon inventory on hand, historical sales activity, and the
expected net realizable value. The net realizable value is determined based upon estimated sales
prices of such inventory through off-price or discount store channels.
(j) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS 109, which requires that the
Company recognize deferred tax liabilities for taxable temporary differences and deferred assets
for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards using enacted tax rates in
effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax benefit or expense
is recognized as a result of changes in net deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities. A
valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all of any deferred
tax assets will not be realized.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FIN 48, which contains a two-step
process for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS
No. 109. The first step is to determine whether or not a tax benefit should be recognized. A tax
benefit will be recognized if the weight of available evidence indicates that the tax position is
more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the relevant tax authorities. The
recognition and measurement of benefits related to our tax positions requires significant judgment
as uncertainties often exist with respect to new laws, new interpretations of existing laws,
46
and rulings by taxing authorities. Differences between actual results and our assumptions, or
changes in our assumptions in future periods, are recorded in the period they become known.
(k) Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is computed using the straight-line
method based on the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
20 years |
Building improvements |
|
10 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
5 years |
Leasehold improvements |
|
Useful life or remaining lease term, whichever is shorter |
(l) Intangible Assets
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are measured for impairment at least annually
and more often when events indicate that impairment exists. Intellectual property, which include
intellectual property, artwork and design, trade name and trademark are amortized over their useful
lives ranging from 110 years, generally on a straight-line basis. Intangible assets, as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Intellectual property |
|
$ |
6,800 |
|
|
$ |
3,300 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
(3,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible Assets |
|
$ |
5,407 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(m) Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to
amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and
used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds
its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The Company recorded an
impairment charge of $1.7 million in 2008. The Company did not record an impairment charge in 2007
or 2006.
(n) Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which the advertisements are first run or over
the life of the endorsement contract. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 was approximately $97.3 million, $99.2 million, and $83.0 million, respectively.
Prepaid advertising costs at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were both $0.8 million. Prepaid amounts
outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007 represent the unamortized portion of endorsement
contracts and advertising in trade publications which had not run as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
(o) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represents net earnings divided by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share, in addition to the weighted
average determined for basic earnings per share, includes potential common shares which would arise
from the exercise of stock options using the treasury stock method, and the conversion of the
Companys 4.50% convertible subordinated notes for the period outstanding since their issuance in
April 2002 until their conversion in February 2007, if their effects are dilutive.
47
The following is a reconciliation of net earnings and weighted average common shares
outstanding for purposes of calculating earnings per share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
Basic earnings per share |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Net earnings |
|
$ |
55,396 |
|
|
$ |
75,686 |
|
|
$ |
70,994 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
46,031 |
|
|
|
45,262 |
|
|
|
41,079 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
55,396 |
|
|
$ |
75,686 |
|
|
$ |
70,994 |
|
After tax effect of interest expense on
4.50% convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings for purposes of
computing diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
55,396 |
|
|
$ |
76,047 |
|
|
$ |
73,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
46,031 |
|
|
|
45,262 |
|
|
|
41,079 |
|
Dilutive stock options |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
Weighted average assumed conversion of
4.50% convertible subordinated notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
46,708 |
|
|
|
46,741 |
|
|
|
46,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 156,716 shares of Class A common stock were excluded from the computation
of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2008 because their inclusion would
have been anti-dilutive. There were no options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings
per share for the year ended December 31, 2007 or 2006.
(p) Product Design and Development Costs
The Company charges all product design and development costs to expense when incurred. Product
design and development costs aggregated approximately $8.8 million, $9.2 million, and $8.3 million
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
(q) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of the Companys financial instruments, which principally include cash and
cash equivalents, investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses,
approximates fair value due to the relatively short maturity of such instruments.
The carrying amount of the Companys long-term borrowings approximates the fair value based
upon current rates and terms available to the Company for similar debt.
(r) New Accounting Standards
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162 The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for
selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental
entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. This statement shall be effective 60 days
following the Securities Exchange and Commissions approval of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 162 will have
a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB-14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That
May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)). FSP APB 14-1
clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including
partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, Accounting for
48
Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. Additionally, this FSP
specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity
components in a manner that will reflect the entitys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when
interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This FSP is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on
our Consolidated Financial Statements; however, we do not expect that the adoption of FSP APB-14-1
will have a material impact on our previously reported financial condition or results of
operations.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activitiesan amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. This Statement requires enhanced
disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities, including (a) how and why an
entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect
an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.
We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements;
however, we do not expect that the adoption of SFAS 161 will have a material impact on our
financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Accounting for Noncontrolling Interests, which
clarifies the classification of noncontrolling interests in consolidated statements of financial
position and the accounting for and reporting of transactions between the reporting entity and
holders of such noncontrolling interests. SFAS 160 will be effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our
Consolidated Financial Statements; however, we expect that the adoption of SFAS 160 will have an
impact on our financial condition and results of operations, however, we do not believe that impact
to be material.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) Applying the Acquisition Method, which
clarifies the accounting for a business combination and requires an acquirer to recognize the
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the
acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. SFAS 141(R) will be effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact of this
standard on our Consolidated Financial Statements; however, we do not expect that the adoption of
SFAS 141(R) will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
(2) INVESTMENTS
Investments in marketable securities consist of certain auction rate preferred stocks and
auction rate DRD preferred securities aggregating $81.9 million at December 31, 2008, net of
unrealized losses of $13.7 million, and $104.5 million at December 31, 2007. These investments
have been classified as noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008
based on their illiquidity resulting from the failure of the auction rate market discussed below.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 issuers refinanced $14.0 million of our preferred
stock investments at par. Our available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2008 included $76.4
million of auction rate preferred stocks and $19.2 million of auction rate DRD preferred
securities. The auction rate preferred stocks are collateralized by portfolios of municipal bonds
issued by various state and local governments, collateral is required to be maintained at 200% of
the amount of preferred stock, and interest rates are reset at weekly auctions every seven days.
The auction rate DRD preferred securities are collateralized by corporate preferred stocks, and
interest rates are reset at auctions every 90 days.
Since February 2008, as a result of the liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and
capital markets, periodic auctions for the Companys auction rate securities have failed. As a
result of these failed auctions, the interest rates on the investments reset to specified default
rates. A failed auction is not necessarily an indication of increased credit risk or a reduction
in the underlying collateral; however, the Company will not be able to liquidate the investments
until a successful auction occurs, a buyer is found outside the auction process, the securities are
called or refinanced by the issuer, or the securities mature. Accordingly, there is no assurance
that future auctions will succeed or that other events will occur to provide liquidity, and as a
result, our ability to liquidate our investments in the near term may be limited or may not exist.
On a quarterly basis, the Company assesses its investments for impairment. If the investments
are deemed to be impaired, the Company then determines whether the impairment is temporary or other
than temporary. If the impairment is deemed to be temporary, the Company records an unrealized
loss in other comprehensive income. If the impairment is deemed to be other than temporary, the
Company records the impairment in the Companys consolidated statements of earnings.
49
Because of the lack of liquidity noted above, the Company determined that there were no
observable market transactions for which to determine the fair value of these auction rate
securities, nor was there a consistent methodology employed by broker-dealers to provide values to
their clients for these investments. As a result, the Company determined that these investments
met the definition of the Level III fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157. The Companys management
estimated the fair value of the Companys holdings of these securities based on a calculated
discount based on internal assumptions and limited market data as well as ongoing plans announced
by certain issuers to partially redeem or attempt to restore liquidity to these securities and
whether any of these efforts will be successful. The Company calculated a discount of $13.7
million, of which $3.8 million, or approximately 4.9% of the par value related to auction rate
preferred stocks and $9.9 million, or approximately 52% of the par value related to the auction
rate DRD preferred securities. The Companys valuation is highly subjective and could change
significantly based on the assumptions used. Our marketable securities are the only assets and
liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value using the SFAS 157 hierarchy.
The auction rate securities held by the Company were purchased from Wachovia Securities.
During 2008, Wachovia Securities announced that it had agreed to a settlement with state and
federal regulators whereby it would repurchase all of the auction rate securities it had sold to
clients prior to the collapse of the auction rate market in February 2008. The Company believes
that all of its auction rate securities are subject to this settlement and, as a result, expects to
receive an offer to repurchase these securities between June 10, 2009 and June 30, 2009. Until
such time as (a) the formal offer is received and Wachovia repurchases these securities, (b) they
are redeemed by the issuer(s), or (c) they can be sold at par value, the Company intends to
consider these securities as available for sale securities and classify them as long-term assets.
In the meantime, the issuers of these securities continue to make interest payments at specified
default rates.
(3) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
28,951 |
|
|
$ |
14,358 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
88,181 |
|
|
|
56,012 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
92,209 |
|
|
|
85,354 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
98,140 |
|
|
|
79,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment |
|
|
307,481 |
|
|
|
235,101 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
149,724 |
|
|
|
136,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
157,757 |
|
|
$ |
98,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company capitalized $1.0 million and $0.9 million of interest expense during 2008 and
2007, respectively, relating to the construction of our corporate headquarters.
(4) ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accrued inventory purchases |
|
$ |
5,913 |
|
|
$ |
3,937 |
|
Accrued payroll and related taxes |
|
|
17,108 |
|
|
|
14,919 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
$ |
23,021 |
|
|
$ |
19,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS OR LINE OF CREDIT
On May 31, 2006, the Company amended its secured line of credit, which permits the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries to borrow up to $150.0 million based upon eligible accounts receivable
and inventory, which line can be increased to $250.0 million at our request, if the lenders agree
to such increase. Borrowings bear interest at the borrowers election based on either the prime
rate or LIBOR. Prime rate loans will bear interest at a rate equal to JPMorgan Chase Banks
publicly announced prime rate less up to 0.50%. LIBOR loans will bear interest at a rate equal to
the applicable LIBOR plus up to an additional 1.75%. The Company pays a monthly
50
unused line of credit fee of 0.25% per annum. The loan agreement, which expires on May 31,
2011, provides for the issuance of letters of credit up to a maximum of $30.0 million. The loan
agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for secured credit facilities of
this type, including a financial covenant requiring a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than
1.1 at the end of each quarter if excess availability of eligible account receivable and inventory
is less than $50.0 million at any time during such quarter. Excess availability was not less than
$50.0 million during the three months ended December 31, 2008; hence, the fixed charge ratio
requirement was not applicable at such date. No amounts were outstanding and the Company was in
compliance with all other covenants of the loan agreement at December 31, 2008. The Company had
$2.9 million and $9.6 million of outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
(6) LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
Long-term debt at December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Note payable to bank, due in monthly
installments of $82.2 (includes
principal and interest), fixed rate
interest at 7.79%, secured by property,
balloon payment of $8,716 due January
2011 |
|
$ |
9,306 |
|
|
$ |
9,557 |
|
Note payable to bank, due in monthly
installments of $57.6 (includes
principal and interest), fixed rate
interest at 7.89%, secured by property,
balloon payment of $6,776 due February
2011 |
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
7,268 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
16,760 |
|
|
|
16,899 |
|
Less current installments |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
16,188 |
|
|
$ |
16,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate maturities of long-term borrowings at December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
572 |
|
2010 |
|
|
547 |
|
2011 |
|
|
15,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys long-term debt obligations contain both financial and non-financial covenants,
including cross default provisions. The Company is in compliance with its non-financial covenants,
including any cross default provisions, and financial covenants of our long-term debt as of
December 31, 2008.
(7) STOCK COMPENSATION
(a) Equity Incentive Plans
In January 1998, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 1998 Stock Option, Deferred
Stock and Restricted Stock Plan for the grant of qualified incentive stock options (ISOs), non
qualified stock options and deferred and restricted stock (the Equity Incentive Plan). The
exercise price for any option granted may not be less than fair value (110% of fair value for ISOs
granted to certain employees). In June 2001, the stockholders approved an amendment to the plan to
increase the number of shares of Class A Common Stock authorized for issuance under the plan to
8,215,154. In May 2003, stockholders approved an amendment to the plan to increase the number of
shares of Class A Common Stock authorized for issuance under the plan to 11,215,154. Option awards
are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys stock at
the date of grant. Stock option awards generally become exercisable over a graded vesting period
and expire ten years from the date of grant.
On April 16, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the
2007 Plan), and the 2007 Plan became effective upon approval by the Companys stockholders on May
24, 2007. The Companys Board of Directors terminated the Equity Incentive Plan as of May 24,
2007, with no additional granting of awards being permitted thereafter, although any awards then
outstanding under the Equity Incentive Plan remain in force according to the terms of the
terminated plan and the applicable award agreements. A total of 7,500,000 shares of Class A Common
Stock are reserved for issuance under the 2007 Plan, which provides for grants of stock options,
restricted stock and various other types of awards as described in the plan to the
51
employees, consultants and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. The 2007 Plan is
administered by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors.
(b) Valuation Assumptions
For net earnings purposes, the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model that uses the assumptions noted in the following
table. Expected volatility is based on historical share price data. The Company uses historical
employee exercise and cancellation data to estimate expected term and forfeiture rates. The
risk-free rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant. Employees that
have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Option
valuation methods require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock
price volatility, expected term and forfeiture rate. Because the Black-Scholes based option
valuation models incorporate assumptions for inputs, those inputs are disclosed in the table as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
62 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.52 |
% |
Expected life of option |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no ISOs granted during 2008 or 2007. Using the Black-Scholes option valuation
model, the weighted-average fair value per share of options granted during 2006 was $12.70. The
total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $2.7 million, $9.9
million, and $25.5 million, respectively.
(c) Stock-Based Payment Awards
A summary of the status and changes of our nonvested shares related to the Equity Incentive
Plan and the 2007 Plan as of and during the period ended December 31, 2008 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE |
|
|
SHARES |
|
GRANT-DATE FAIR VALUE |
Nonvested at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
15,167 |
|
|
$ |
18.32 |
|
Granted |
|
|
218,046 |
|
|
|
16.85 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(10,001 |
) |
|
|
16.26 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(5,928 |
) |
|
|
17.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
217,284 |
|
|
$ |
16.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares generally vest over a graded vesting schedule from one to four years and
expire ten years from the date of grant.
52
Shares subject to option under the Equity Incentive Plan and the 2007 Plan were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED |
|
|
|
SHARES |
|
|
OPTION EXERCISE PRICE |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
4,209,437 |
|
|
$ |
10.98 |
|
Granted |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
19.49 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,711,945 |
) |
|
|
9.96 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(26,910 |
) |
|
|
10.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,485,582 |
|
|
|
11.74 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(501,874 |
) |
|
|
12.23 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(21,952 |
) |
|
|
16.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,961,756 |
|
|
|
11.56 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(206,844 |
) |
|
|
9.06 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(15,191 |
) |
|
|
19.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,739,721 |
|
|
$ |
11.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares and options available for grant at
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
7,287,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was approximately $2.2 million and $0.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options and restricted stock granted under our Equity Incentive Plan or
the 2007 Plan as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years and 1 year, respectively. The total fair
value of shares vested during the period ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $0.1 million and $1.1
million, respectively. The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding
and exercisable at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING |
|
OPTIONS EXERCISABLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
WEIGHTED |
|
WEIGHTED |
|
NUMBER |
|
AVERAGE |
RANGE OF |
|
OUTSTANDING |
|
AVERAGE REMAINING |
|
AVERAGE |
|
EXERCISABLE AT |
|
EXERCISE |
EXERCISE PRICE |
|
DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
CONTRACTUAL LIFE |
|
EXERCISE PRICE |
|
DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
PRICE |
$3.94 to $5.90 |
|
|
28,749 |
|
|
1.1 years |
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
28,749 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
$6.95 to $9.28 |
|
|
606,774 |
|
|
4.3 years |
|
|
7.47 |
|
|
|
606,774 |
|
|
|
7.47 |
|
$10.58 to $15.50 |
|
|
947,482 |
|
|
2.0 years |
|
|
12.83 |
|
|
|
944,232 |
|
|
|
12.83 |
|
$19.18 to $24.00 |
|
|
156,716 |
|
|
2.3 years |
|
|
23.69 |
|
|
|
156,716 |
|
|
|
23.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,739,721 |
|
|
2.8 years |
|
$ |
11.79 |
|
|
|
1,736,471 |
|
|
$ |
11.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Stock Purchase Plans
Effective July 1, 1998, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the 1998 ESPP). The 1998 ESPP provides that a total of 2,781,415 shares of Class A
Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the plan. The 1998 ESPP, which is intended to qualify
as an employee stock purchase plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, is implemented utilizing six-month offerings with purchases occurring at six-month
intervals. The 1998 ESPP administration is overseen by the Board of Directors. Employees are
eligible to participate if they are employed by the Company for at least 20 hours per week and more
than five months in any calendar year. The 1998 ESPP permits eligible employees to purchase Class
A Common Stock through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of an employees compensation.
The price of Class A Common Stock purchased under the 1998 ESPP is 85% of the lower of the fair
market value of the Class A Common Stock at the beginning of each six-month offering period or on
the applicable purchase date. Employees may end their participation in an offering at any time
during the offering period.
53
On April 16, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the 2008 ESPP), and the Companys stockholders approved the 2008 ESPP on May 24, 2007. The
2008 ESPP became effective on January 1, 2008, and the Companys Board of Directors terminated the
1998 ESPP as of such date, with no additional granting of rights being permitted under the 1998
ESPP. The 2008 ESPP provides that a total of 3,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock are reserved
for issuance under the plan. This number of shares that may be made available for sale is subject
to automatic increases on the first day of each fiscal year during the term of the 2008 ESPP as
provided in the plan. The 2008 ESPP is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan
under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The terms of the 2008 ESPP,
which are substantially similar to those of the 1998 ESPP, permit eligible employees to purchase
Class A Common Stock at six-month intervals through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of
an employees compensation. The price of Class A Common Stock purchased under the 2008 ESPP is 85%
of the lower of the fair market value of the Class A Common Stock at the beginning of each
six-month offering period or on the applicable purchase date. The 2008 ESPP is administered by the
Companys Board of Directors.
During 2008, 132,300 shares were issued under the 2008 ESPP for which the Company received
approximately $1.8 million, and during 2007 and 2006, 98,349 and 121,378 shares were issued,
respectively, under the 1998 ESPP for which the Company received approximately $2.1 million, and
$1.9 million, respectively.
(8) STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Stock Issuances
The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 100,000,000 shares of Class A Common
Stock, par value $.001 per share, 60,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $.001 per
share, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value per share.
The Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock have identical rights other than with
respect to voting, conversion and transfer. The Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote per
share, while the Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes per share on all matters submitted
to a vote of stockholders. The shares of Class B Common Stock are convertible at any time at the
option of the holder into shares of Class A Common Stock on a share-for-share basis. In addition,
shares of Class B Common Stock will be automatically converted into a like number of shares of
Class A Common Stock upon any transfer to any person or entity which is not a permitted transferee.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006 certain Class B stockholders converted 69,404, 916,400, and
2,883,000 shares, respectively, of Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock.
(9) TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET
Other income (expense), net at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency transactions |
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
(295 |
) |
|
$ |
116 |
|
Legal settlements |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income, net |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
(10) INCOME TAXES
The provisions for income tax expense were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Federal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
9,026 |
|
|
$ |
33,354 |
|
|
$ |
38,252 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(6,714 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(4,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total federal |
|
|
2,312 |
|
|
|
33,053 |
|
|
|
33,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
7,255 |
|
|
|
7,398 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total state |
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
7,189 |
|
|
|
6,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
2,686 |
|
|
|
2,192 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign |
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
$ |
7,258 |
|
|
$ |
42,619 |
|
|
$ |
41,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes differ from the statutory tax rates as applied to earnings before income taxes as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Expected income tax expense |
|
$ |
21,260 |
|
|
$ |
41,407 |
|
|
$ |
39,427 |
|
State income tax, net of federal benefit |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
4,031 |
|
Rate differential on foreign income |
|
|
(10,697 |
) |
|
|
(9,699 |
) |
|
|
(4,820 |
) |
Change in unrecognized tax benefits |
|
|
(7,896 |
) |
|
|
7,024 |
|
|
|
3,393 |
|
Exempt income |
|
|
(1,241 |
) |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(967 |
) |
Other |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
7,258 |
|
|
$ |
42,619 |
|
|
$ |
41,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred
tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are presented below (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS: |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred tax assets current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory adjustments |
|
$ |
5,337 |
|
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
6,658 |
|
|
|
6,540 |
|
Allowances for bad debts and
chargebacks |
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
15,396 |
|
|
|
11,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets long term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation on property and equipment |
|
|
10,735 |
|
|
|
11,441 |
|
Unrealized loss on securities |
|
|
5,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss carryforwards |
|
|
5,273 |
|
|
|
3,133 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(3,934 |
) |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term assets |
|
|
18,158 |
|
|
|
13,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
33,554 |
|
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
30,113 |
|
|
$ |
22,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Management believes it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will
generate sufficient taxable income to realize the net deferred tax assets.
Consolidated U.S. income before income taxes was $27.9 million, $87.3 million, and $98.2
million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The corresponding
income before income taxes for non-U.S. based operations was $32.9 million, $31.0 million, and
$14.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The amounts of
2007 and 2006 U.S. and non-U.S. income before taxes reflected in this paragraph have been adjusted
to reflect the reclassifications of income between U.S. and non-U.S. operations resulting from the
advanced pricing agreement entered into with the IRS in 2008.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had combined foreign operating loss
carry-forwards available to reduce future taxable income of approximately $17.5 million and $8.7
million, respectively. Some of these net operating losses expire beginning in 2011, however others
can be carried forward indefinitely. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, a valuation allowance
against deferred tax assets of $3.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively, had been set up for
those loss carry-forwards that are not more likely than not to be fully utilized in reducing future
taxable income.
As of December 31, 2008, withholding and U.S. taxes have not been provided on approximately
$64.1 million of cumulative undistributed earnings of the Companys non-U.S. subsidiaries because
the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest these earnings in its non-U.S. subsidiaries.
We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a result of the implementation of
FIN 48, we recognized approximately a $3.4 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax
benefits, which was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained
earnings.
The balance of unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $9.0 million during the year. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
18,698 |
|
Additions for current year tax positions |
|
|
317 |
|
Additions for prior year tax positions |
|
|
|
|
Reductions for prior year tax positions |
|
|
|
|
Settlement of uncertain tax positions |
|
|
(6,537 |
) |
Reductions related to lapse of statute of limitations |
|
|
(2,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
9,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
If recognized, the entire amount of unrecognized tax benefits would be recorded as a reduction
in income tax expense.
Estimated interest and penalties related to the underpayment of income taxes are classified as
a component of income tax expense and totaled less than $0.1 million, $0.5 million, and $0.1
million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Accrued interest and
penalties were $1.2 million and $1.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local
and foreign jurisdictions. The Company has completed U.S. federal audits through 2003, and is not
currently under examination by the United States Internal Revenue Service; however the company is
under examination by a number of states. It is reasonably possible that most or all of these
examinations could be settled within the next twelve months which would reduce the balance of 2008
and prior year unrecognized tax benefits by $2.2 million.
With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state, local or non-U.S. income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years before 2005. During the third quarter, the statute of
limitations for the 2004 tax year lapsed for the U.S. federal and several state tax jurisdictions.
The lapse in statute reduced the balance of prior year unrecognized tax benefits by $2.9 million.
Tax years 2005 through 2007 remain open to examination by the U.S. federal, state, and foreign
taxing jurisdictions under which we are subject. It is reasonably possible that the statute of
limitations for the 2005 tax year will lapse for the U.S. federal and most state tax jurisdictions
during 2009, which would reduce the balance of 2008 and prior year unrecognized tax benefits by
$0.5 million.
56
We have applied for advanced pricing agreements with various tax authorities related to the
pricing of certain intercompany transactions. During the third quarter, the Company entered into an
APA with the IRS related to certain intercompany transactions. As a result of this agreement the
prior year balance of unrecognized tax benefits was reduced by $6.5 million. It is reasonably
possible that we will receive final decisions on the remaining application within the next twelve
months which would reduce the balance of 2008 and prior year unrecognized tax benefits by $0.5
million. If the advanced pricing agreements are not resolved in 2009, we will continue to add to
the unrecognized tax benefits during the year, and that increase could be approximately $0.1
million to $0.3 million.
(11) BUSINESS AND CREDIT CONCENTRATIONS
The Company operates in the footwear industry and generates most of its sales in the United
States, although its products are sold into various foreign countries. The footwear industry is
impacted by the general economy. Changes in the marketplace may significantly affect managements
estimates and the Companys performance. Management performs regular evaluations concerning the
ability of its customers to satisfy their obligations and provides for estimated doubtful accounts.
Domestic accounts receivable, which generally do not require collateral from customers, amounted
to $111.9 million and $110.3 million before allowances for bad debts and sales returns, and
chargebacks at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Foreign accounts receivable, which
generally are collateralized by letters of credit, amounted to $78.1 million and $67.4 million
before allowance for bad debts, sales returns, and chargebacks at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. International net sales amounted to $357.2 million, $291.3 million, and $203.3
million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Companys credit
losses due to write-offs for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $10.8 million,
$1.6 million, and $4.6 million, respectively, and were primarily from domestic accounts.
Net sales to customers in North America exceeded 75% of total net sales for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008. Assets located outside the United States consist
primarily of cash, accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and other assets. Net
assets held outside the United States were $120.5 million and $126.1 million at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
During 2008, 2007, and 2006, no customer accounted for 10.0% or more of net sales. No customer
accounted for more than 10.0% of net trade receivables at December 31, 2008. One customer
accounted for 10.0% and 12.0% of net trade receivables at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
During 2008, 2007 and 2006, our net sales to our five largest customers were approximately 24.1%,
25.3%, and 24.9%, respectively.
During 2008, the Company had four manufacturers which accounted for between 6.6% and 30.6% of
total purchases. During 2007, the Company had four manufacturers which accounted for between 7.9%
and 29.7% of total purchases. During 2006, the Company had four manufacturers which accounted for
between 8.9% and 30.8% of total purchases.
Most of the Companys products are produced in China. The Companys operations are subject to
the customary risks of doing business abroad, including, but not limited to, currency fluctuations,
custom duties and related fees, various import controls and other monetary barriers, restrictions
on the transfer of funds, labor unrest and strikes and, in certain parts of the world, political
instability. The Company believes it has acted to reduce these risks by diversifying manufacturing
among various factories. To date, these risk factors have not had a material adverse impact on the
Companys operations.
(12) BENEFIT PLAN
The Company has adopted a 401(K) profit sharing plan covering all employees who are 21 years
of age and have completed six months of service. Employees may contribute up to 15.0% of annual
compensation. Company contributions to the plan are discretionary and vest over a six year period.
The Companys cash contributions to the plan amounted to $1.2 million and $1.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company did not make a contribution for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
(13) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(a) Leases
The Company leases facilities under operating lease agreements expiring through March 2029.
The Company pays taxes, maintenance and insurance in addition to the lease obligation. The Company
also leases certain equipment and automobiles under
57
operating lease agreements expiring at various dates through November 2013. Rent expense for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 approximated $57.4 million, $48.9 million, and
$40.4 million, respectively.
The Company also leases certain property and equipment under capital lease agreements
requiring monthly installment payments through June 2010.
Minimum lease payments, which takes into account escalation clauses, are recognized on a
straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. Subsequent adjustments to our lease payments due
to changes in an existing index, usually the consumer price index, are typically included in our
calculation of the minimum lease payments when the adjustment is known. Reimbursements for
leasehold improvements are recorded as liabilities and are amortized over the lease term. Lease
concessions, in our case usually a free rent period, are considered in the calculation of our
minimum lease payments for the minimum lease term.
Future minimum lease payments under noncancellable leases at December 31, 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL |
|
|
OPERATING |
|
|
|
LEASES |
|
|
LEASES |
|
Year ending December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
$ |
67,849 |
|
2010 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
73,305 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,166 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,515 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,837 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
$ |
549,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Litigation
The Company recognizes legal expense in connection with loss contingencies as incurred.
On July 10, 2008, Crocs, Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court
for the District of Colorado, CROCS, INC. v. SKECHERS U.S.A., INC. (Case No. 08cv01450-RPM). The
complaint alleges patent infringement, trade dress infringement and dilution, unfair competition
and deceptive trade practices arising out of the Companys manufacture, distribution and sales of
footwear that is allegedly similar to several Crocs products. The lawsuit seeks, among other
things, actual damages, treble or punitive damages as applicable, profits, attorneys fees and
costs, and a preliminary and/or permanent injunction against the Company to prevent any future
manufacturing, distribution or sales of footwear that infringes Crocs design patents or trade
dress or that uses any mark that is confusingly similar to Crocs animated crocodile design mark.
Subsequently, the parties reached a settlement in principle, and on December 2, 2008, they reduced
it to writing and finalized a formal settlement agreement. The settlement did not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
The Company has no reason to believe that any liability with respect to pending legal actions,
individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements or results of operations. The Company occasionally becomes involved in
litigation arising from the normal course of business, and management is unable to determine the
extent of any liability that may arise from unanticipated future litigation.
(c) Product and Other Financing
The Company finances production activities in part through the use of interest-bearing open
purchase arrangements with certain of its international manufacturers. These arrangements currently
bear interest at rates between 0% and 1.5% per 30 to 60 day term. The amounts outstanding under
these arrangements at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were $79.6 million and $81.3 million,
respectively, which are included in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Interest expense incurred by the Company under these arrangements amounted to $3.6 million
in 2008, $3.3 million in 2007, and $2.9 million in 2006. The Company has contractual commitments
relating to licensing arrangements of $7.1 million through 2014 and open purchase commitments with
our foreign manufacturers of $84.4 million which are not included in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. The company is currently in the process of designing and purchasing the equipment
to be used in its new distribution center. The total cost of this equipment is expected to be
approximately $85.0 million, of which $23.1 million was incurred as of December 31, 2008.
58
(14) SEGMENT INFORMATION
We have four reportable segments domestic wholesale sales, international wholesale sales,
retail sales, and e-commerce sales. Management evaluates segment performance based primarily on
net sales and gross margins. All other costs and expenses of the Company are analyzed on an
aggregate basis, and these costs are not allocated to the Companys segments. Net sales, gross
margins and identifiable assets for the domestic wholesale segment, international wholesale,
retail, and the e-commerce segment on a combined basis were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic wholesale |
|
$ |
807,047 |
|
|
$ |
831,235 |
|
|
$ |
772,920 |
|
International wholesale |
|
|
332,503 |
|
|
|
267,648 |
|
|
|
183,687 |
|
Retail |
|
|
283,128 |
|
|
|
279,361 |
|
|
|
237,390 |
|
E-commerce |
|
|
18,065 |
|
|
|
15,937 |
|
|
|
11,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,440,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,205,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic wholesale |
|
$ |
276,604 |
|
|
$ |
320,364 |
|
|
$ |
301,215 |
|
International wholesale |
|
|
137,840 |
|
|
|
99,759 |
|
|
|
65,034 |
|
Retail |
|
|
172,870 |
|
|
|
171,758 |
|
|
|
151,456 |
|
E-commerce |
|
|
8,608 |
|
|
|
8,108 |
|
|
|
5,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
595,922 |
|
|
$ |
599,989 |
|
|
$ |
523,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Identifiable assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic wholesale |
|
$ |
678,881 |
|
|
$ |
629,377 |
|
International wholesale |
|
|
110,930 |
|
|
|
118,195 |
|
Retail |
|
|
86,236 |
|
|
|
80,250 |
|
E-commerce |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
876,316 |
|
|
$ |
827,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic wholesale |
|
$ |
45,709 |
|
|
$ |
11,371 |
|
International wholesale |
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
Retail |
|
|
19,859 |
|
|
|
18,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
72,461 |
|
|
$ |
31,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
Geographic Information
The following summarizes our operations in different geographic areas for the year indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net Sales (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,083,498 |
|
|
$ |
1,102,895 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,022 |
|
Canada |
|
|
43,088 |
|
|
|
38,060 |
|
|
|
25,276 |
|
Other International (2) |
|
|
314,157 |
|
|
|
253,226 |
|
|
|
178,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,440,743 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,205,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Long-lived Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
148,228 |
|
|
$ |
96,044 |
|
Canada |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Other International (2) |
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
157,757 |
|
|
$ |
98,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company has subsidiaries in Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Italy,
Netherlands, Brazil, Thailand and Malaysia that generate net sales within those respective
countries and in some cases the neighboring regions. The Company has joint ventures in China
and Hong Kong that generate net sales from those countries. The Company also has a subsidiary
in Switzerland that generates net sales from that country in addition to net sales to our
distributors located in numerous non-European countries. Net sales are attributable to
geographic regions based on the location of the Company subsidiary. |
|
(2) |
|
Other international consists of Brazil, Malaysia, Thailand, China, Hong Kong, Switzerland,
United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, and Netherlands. |
(15) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company paid approximately $183,000, $175,000 and $177,000 during 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, to the Manhattan Inn Operating Company, LLC (MIOC) for lodging, food and events
including the Companys holiday party at the Shade Hotel, which is owned and operated by MIOC.
Michael Greenberg, President and a director of the Company, owns a 12% beneficial ownership
interest in MIOC, and four other officers, directors and senior vice presidents of the Company own
in aggregate an additional 5% beneficial ownership in MIOC. The Company had no outstanding
accounts receivable or payable with MIOC or the Shade Hotel at December 31, 2008.
The Company had receivables from officers and employees of $0.5 million and $0.3 million at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts primarily relate to travel advances and
incidental personal purchases on Company-issued credit cards that are not business-related
expenses. These receivables are short-term and are expected to be repaid within a reasonable
period of time. During 2008, the Company purchased an automobile at fair market value for $140,000
from Michael Greenberg, President and a director of the Company.
We had no other significant transactions with or payables to officers, directors or
significant shareholders of the Company.
60
(16) SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Summarized unaudited financial data are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
MARCH 31 |
|
JUNE 30 |
|
SEPTEMBER 30 |
|
DECEMBER 31 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
384,922 |
|
|
$ |
354,574 |
|
|
$ |
403,159 |
|
|
$ |
298,088 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
172,172 |
|
|
|
157,193 |
|
|
|
171,531 |
|
|
|
95,026 |
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
|
32,844 |
|
|
|
14,641 |
|
|
|
28,289 |
|
|
|
(20,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
MARCH 31 |
|
JUNE 30 |
|
SEPTEMBER 30 |
|
DECEMBER 31 |
Net sales |
|
$ |
344,896 |
|
|
$ |
352,211 |
|
|
$ |
395,033 |
|
|
$ |
302,041 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
149,039 |
|
|
|
152,028 |
|
|
|
171,670 |
|
|
|
127,252 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
23,900 |
|
|
|
14,948 |
|
|
|
24,744 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Attached as exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K are certifications of our Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), which are required in accordance
with Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). This
Controls and Procedures section includes information concerning the controls and controls
evaluation referred to in the certifications.
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The term disclosure controls and procedures refers to the controls and other procedures of a
company that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. We have established disclosure
controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Skechers and its
consolidated subsidiaries is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports, as well
as other members of senior management and the Board of Directors, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures. As of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form
10-K, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based upon that
evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
61
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions
and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our
assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our evaluation under the
framework in Internal Control- Integrated Framework, our management has concluded that as of
December 31, 2008, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Our independent registered public accountants, KPMG LLP, audited the consolidated financial
statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K and have issued an attestation report on the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which is
included in Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.
INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
There were no significant changes to our internal controls over financial reporting that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2008, and we have completed our efforts regarding
compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The results of our evaluation are discussed above in Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On January 22, 2009, our Compensation Committee approved the 2009 annual incentive
compensation formulae for our executive management, including the Named Executive Officers (as
defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K), which will allow for executive management to earn incentive
compensation on a quarterly basis in the event that certain specified performance goals are
achieved under our 2006 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2006 Plan). The purpose is to
provide our executive management with the opportunity to earn incentive compensation based on our
financial performance by linking incentive award opportunities to the achievement of certain
performance goals.
The Compensation Committee approved the business criteria to be used in the formulae to
calculate the incentive compensation to be paid to our executive management on a quarterly basis
for 2009. The business criteria that will be used to calculate the incentive compensation of
Robert Greenberg (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), Michael Greenberg (President), David
Weinberg (Chief Operating Officer) and Mark Nason (Executive Vice President of Product Development)
are our net sales and EBITDA, while our net sales will be used for calculating the incentive
compensation of Fred Schneider (Chief Financial Officer). The Compensation Committee believes that
each of these criteria provides an accurate and comprehensive measure of our annual performance.
62
The potential payments of incentive compensation to our executive management, including the
Named Executive Officers, are performance-driven and therefore completely at risk. The payment of
any incentive compensation is conditioned on our company achieving at least certain threshold
performance levels of the business criteria approved by the Compensation Committee, and no payments
will be made to the Named Executive Officers if the threshold performance levels are not met. Any
incentive compensation to be paid to the Named Executive Officers in excess of the threshold
amounts is based on the Compensation Committees pre-approved business criteria and formulae for
the respective Named Executive Officers. In approving the percentages that will be used in the
formulae to calculate the Named Executive Officers potential payments of incentive compensation
for 2009, the Compensation Committee considered each Named Executive Officers position,
responsibilities and prospective contribution to the attainment of the Companys specified
performance goals. The threshold performance levels for 2009 are attainable, and additional
incentive compensation may be earned based on our companys financial performance exceeding
increasingly challenging levels of performance goals, none of which is certain to be achieved.
Consistent with the prior year, the Compensation Committee did not place a maximum limit on the
incentive compensation that may be earned by the Named Executive Officers in 2009, although the
maximum amount of incentive compensation that any Named Executive Officer may earn in a 12-month
period under the 2006 Plan is $5,000,000.
63
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our
definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of
our 2008 fiscal year.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our
definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of
our 2008 fiscal year.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our
definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of
our 2008 fiscal year.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our
definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of
our 2008 fiscal year.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our
definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of
our 2008 fiscal year.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
1. |
|
Financial Statements: See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedule in Part II, Item 8 on page 38 of this annual report on Form 10-K. |
2. |
|
Financial Statement Schedule: See Schedule IIValuation and Qualifying Accounts on page 65
of this annual report on Form 10-K. |
3. |
|
Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed or
incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-K. |
64
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT |
|
CHARGED TO |
|
DEDUCTIONS |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
BEGINNING OF |
|
COSTS AND |
|
AND |
|
AT END |
DESCRIPTION |
|
PERIOD |
|
EXPENSES |
|
WRITE-OFFS |
|
OF PERIOD |
Year-ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for chargebacks |
|
$ |
623 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
$ |
(359 |
) |
|
$ |
1,501 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
(573 |
) |
|
|
2,699 |
|
Reserve for sales returns and
allowances |
|
|
4,608 |
|
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
6,358 |
|
Year-ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for chargebacks |
|
$ |
1,501 |
|
|
$ |
1,684 |
|
|
$ |
(613 |
) |
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
2,348 |
|
Reserve for sales returns and
allowances |
|
|
6,358 |
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
5,364 |
|
Year-ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for chargebacks |
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,940 |
|
|
$ |
(1,598 |
) |
|
$ |
3,914 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
5,495 |
|
|
|
(3,421 |
) |
|
|
4,422 |
|
Reserve for sales returns and
allowances |
|
|
5,364 |
|
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
|
|
6,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT |
|
CHARGED TO |
|
DEDUCTIONS |
|
BALANCE |
|
|
BEGINNING OF |
|
COSTS AND |
|
AND |
|
AT END |
DESCRIPTION |
|
PERIOD |
|
EXPENSES |
|
WRITE-OFFS |
|
OF PERIOD |
Year-ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for shrinkage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for obsolescence |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
Year-ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for shrinkage |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
Reserve for obsolescence |
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
Year-ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for shrinkage |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
Reserve for obsolescence |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
11,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,023 |
|
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm
65
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated April 29,
1999 (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.1 of the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File
No. 333-60065), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on May 12, 1999). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws dated May 28, 1998 (incorporated by reference to exhibit
number 3.2 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-60065) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 29, 1998). |
|
|
|
3.2(a)
|
|
Amendment to Bylaws dated as of April 8, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to exhibit number 3.2(a) of the Registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005). |
|
|
|
3.2(b)
|
|
Second Amendment to Bylaws dated as of December 18, 2007
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 3.1 of the
Registrants Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 20, 2007). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Specimen Class A Common Stock Certificate (incorporated
by reference to exhibit number 4.1 of the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No.
333-60065), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 12, 1999). |
|
|
|
10.1**
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option, Deferred Stock and
Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit
number 10.1 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (File No. 333-60065) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 29, 1998). |
|
|
|
10.1(a)**
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option,
Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to exhibit number 4.4 of the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-71114), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2001). |
|
|
|
10.1(b)**
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option,
Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to exhibit number 4.5 of the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-135049), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.1(c)**
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option,
Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to exhibit number 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23,
2007). |
|
|
|
10.2**
|
|
2006 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Appendix A of the Registrants Definitive Proxy
Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 1, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.3**
|
|
2007 Incentive Award Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit
number 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.4**
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under 2007 Incentive Award
Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.3 of the
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.5**
|
|
2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
exhibit number 10.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 24, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.6**
|
|
Indemnification Agreement dated June 7, 1999 between the
Registrant and its directors and executive officers (incorporated
by reference to exhibit number 10.6 of the Registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999). |
|
|
|
10.6(a)**
|
|
List of Registrants directors and executive officers who entered
into Indemnification Agreement referenced in Exhibit 10.6 with
the Registrant (incorporated by reference to exhibit number
10.6(a) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005). |
66
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
10.7
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated June 9, 1999, between the
Registrant, the Greenberg Family Trust and Michael Greenberg
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.7 of the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999). |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Tax Indemnification Agreement dated June 8, 1999, between the
Registrant and certain shareholders (incorporated by reference
to exhibit number 10.8 of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1999). |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated
May 31, 2006, by and among the Registrant and certain of its
subsidiaries that are also borrowers under the Agreement,
certain of its subsidiaries who are guarantors under the
Agreement, and certain lenders including The CIT
Group/Commercial Services, Inc., which acts as agent for the
lenders (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 of
the Registrants Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 6, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Promissory Note, dated December 27, 2000, between the
Registrant and Washington Mutual Bank, FA, for the purchase of
property located at 225 South Sepulveda Boulevard, Manhattan
Beach,
California (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.23
of the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000). |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Loan Agreement, dated December 21, 2000, between Yale
Investments, LLC, and MONY Life Insurance Company, for the
purchase of property located at 1670 South Champagne Avenue,
Ontario, California (incorporated by reference to exhibit
number 10.25 of the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000). |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Promissory Note, dated December 21, 2000, between Yale
Investments, LLC, and MONY Life Insurance Company, for the
purchase of property located at 1670 Champagne Avenue, Ontario,
California (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.26
of the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000). |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Agreement dated August 25, 2005 between Duncan Investments,
LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Registrant, and Morley
Construction Company regarding 330 South Sepulveda Boulevard,
Manhattan Beach, California (incorporated by reference to
exhibit number 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
General Conditions of the Contract for Construction regarding
330 South Sepulveda Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.2 of the
Registrants Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 29, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated November 21, 1997, between the
Registrant and The Prudential Insurance Company of America,
regarding 1661 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.14 of the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-60065) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 29, 1998). |
|
|
|
10.15(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated April 26, 2002,
between the Registrant and ProLogis California I LLC, regarding
1661 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California (incorporated by
reference to exhibit number 10.14(a) of the Registrants Form
10-K for the year ended December 21, 2002). |
|
|
|
10.15(b)
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated December 10, 2007,
between the Registrant and ProLogis California I LLC, regarding
1661 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California (incorporated by
reference to exhibit number 10.15(b) of the Registrants Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated November 21, 1997, between the
Registrant and The Prudential Insurance Company of America,
regarding 1777 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.15 of the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-60065) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 29, 1998). |
67
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
10.16(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated April 26, 2002, between the Registrant and Cabot
Industrial Properties, L.P., regarding 1777 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.15(a) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 21, 2002). |
|
|
|
10.16(b)
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated May 14, 2002, between the Registrant and Cabot
Industrial Properties, L.P., regarding 1777 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.16(b) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.16(c)
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated May 7, 2007, between the Registrant and Cabot
Industrial Properties, L.P., regarding 1777 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.16(c) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.16(d)
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated November 10, 2007, between the Registrant and
Cabot Industrial Properties, L.P., regarding 1777 South Vintage Avenue, Ontario, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.16(d) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated April 10, 2001, between the Registrant and ProLogis California I LLC,
regarding 4100 East Mission Boulevard, Ontario, California (incorporated by reference to
exhibit number 10.28 of the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001). |
|
|
|
10.17(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated October 22, 2003, between the Registrant and
ProLogis California I LLC, regarding 4100 East Mission Boulevard, Ontario, California
(incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.28(a) of the Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Lease Agreement, dated February 8, 2002, between Skechers International, a subsidiary of the
Registrant, and ProLogis Belgium II SPRL, regarding ProLogis Park Liege Distribution Center
I in Liege, Belgium (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.29 of the Registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002). |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Lease Agreement dated September 25, 2007 between the Registrant and HF Logistics I, LLC,
regarding distribution facility in Moreno Valley, California (incorporated by reference to
exhibit number 10.1 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 27, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Lease Agreement dated May 20, 2008 between Skechers EDC SPRL, a subsidiary of the
Registrant, and ProLogis Belgium III SPRL, regarding ProLogis Park Liege Distribution Center
II in Liege, Belgium (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.1 of the Registrants
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 27, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Addendum to Lease Agreement dated May 20, 2008 between Skechers EDC SPRL, a subsidiary of
the Registrant, and ProLogis Belgium III SPRL, regarding ProLogis Park Liege Distribution
Center I in Liege, Belgium (incorporated by reference to exhibit number 10.2 of the
Registrants Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 27, 2008). |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
** |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit. |
68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Manhattan Beach, State of California on the 2nd day of March 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ ROBERT GREENBERG
|
|
|
|
Robert Greenberg |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE |
|
TITLE |
|
DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ ROBERT GREENBERG
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ MICHAEL GREENBERG
|
|
President and Director
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ DAVID WEINBERG
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
and
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ FREDERICK H. SCHNEIDER
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ JEFFREY GREENBERG
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ J. GEYER KOSINSKI
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ MORTON D. ERLICH
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ RICHARD SISKIND
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
69