1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation — 

The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by PDF Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. The operating results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or the full fiscal year. The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of all intercompany balances and transactions.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Use of Estimates — 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these financial statements include significant estimates and judgments made in recognizing revenue, accounting for goodwill and intangible assets, stock-based compensation expense and accounting for income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. For a discussion of significant estimates and judgments made in recognizing revenue under the new revenue standard, see Note 2. Revenue Recognition.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements –

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605).” Subsequently, the FASB has issued several amendments to the standard, including clarification on accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations. Under Topic 606, the new revenue recognition standard provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to reflect the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company adopted this new standard on the first day of the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2018. The Company chose to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective transition method. See Note 2. Revenue Recognition, below for further information, including further discussion on the impact of adoption and changes in accounting policies relating to revenue recognition.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The purpose of this standard is to clarify the treatment of several cash flow categories. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, that will require that the amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance also requires certain disclosures to supplement the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. This standard clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements and footnote disclosures.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The update requires that most leases, including operating leases, be recorded on the balance sheet as an asset and a liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments. Subsequently, the lease asset will be amortized generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and the lease liability will bear interest expense and be reduced for lease payments. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies’ financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is still in the process of evaluating the impact of adopting this new accounting standard on its consolidated financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This standard eliminates step 2 from the annual goodwill impairment test. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied on a prospective basis. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effect from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Job Act ("TCJA") enacted in December 2017. This update will be effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures.

In March 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-05, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118". The staff of the SEC recognized the complexity of reflecting the impacts of the TCJA, and on December 22, 2017 issued guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118), which clarifies accounting for income taxes under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740 if information is not yet available or complete and provides for up to a one year period in which to complete the required analysis and accounting (the measurement period).  Refer to Note 5. Income Taxes, for further discussion regarding the impact of this standard to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

2. REVENUE RECOGNITION 

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 606, using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Under this method, the Company evaluated contracts that were in effect at the beginning of fiscal 2018 as if those contracts had been accounted for under Topic 606 from the beginning of their terms. Upon adoption, the Company recognized the cumulative effect of adopting this guidance as an adjustment to accumulated deficit on the date of initial application. The comparative information in prior periods has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.

The Company also considered the impact of subtopic ASC 340-40. Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, the Company expensed commission costs and related fringe benefits as incurred. Under ASC 340-40, the Company is required to capitalize and amortize the incremental costs of obtaining or fulfilling a contract over the period of the expected benefit. Incremental costs of obtaining and fulfilling a contract are recognized as an asset if the costs are expected to be recovered.

The most significant impacts of the adoption of Topic 606 are as follows:

The adoption of Topic 606 impacted the Company’s accounting for certain commercial software multi-element arrangements (“MEA”) that combine software-related deliverables, which may include software contracts with varying terms and service elements. Topic 605 required establishing vendor specific objective evidence of fair value ("VSOE"), for undelivered elements to recognize revenue separately for each of the different elements. Topic 606 requires the Company to allocate consideration to each separate different performance obligation through the use of stand-alone selling prices (“SSPs”) and to recognize the revenue as if those performance obligations had been sold on a standalone basis, either at a point-in-time or over time. The most significant impact of this change relates to the Company’s accounting for software license revenue. For the Company’s Exensio big data solution software which is licensed under a time-based license model, the Company will recognize a portion of revenue on these types of contracts at the time of delivery rather than ratably over the term of the license. For perpetual software license contracts, the Company will allocate consideration to the different performance obligations based on their SSPs rather than using the VSOE for undelivered elements as required under Topic 605. 

In addition, under the Company’s previous accounting practices, revenue was recognized from Gainshare performance incentive agreements in the period of receipt of related Gainshare acknowledgement reports, generally one quarter in arrears from the period in which the underlying sales (usage) occurred. Under Topic 606, the Company is now required to record Gainshare revenue in the same period in which the usage occurs. Because the Company generally does not receive the acknowledgment reports during a given quarter within the time frame necessary to adequately review the reports and include the actual amounts in quarterly results for such quarter, the Company accrues the related revenue based on estimates of customer's underlying sales achievement. As a result of accruing revenue for the quarter based on such estimates, adjustments will be required in the following quarter to true-up revenue to the actual amounts reported.

Under Topic 605, the Company recognized revenue for professional services, including revenue from fixed price solution implementation service contracts, either on a percentage of completion method or time and materials method. Under Topic 606, revenue related to these professional services will remain substantially unchanged.

The following table summarizes the effects of adopting Topic 606 on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018:

The impact of adopting Topic 606 to revenues, cost of revenues and net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 was not significant. There was no significant impact to the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share.

The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 did not change due to the adoption of Topic 606. The following table summarizes the effects of adopting Topic 606 on the financial statement line items of the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018:

The Company derives revenue from two sources: Design-to-silicon-yield solutions and Gainshare performance incentives.

Revenue is recognized when control of products or services is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those promised products or services.

The Company determines revenue recognition through the following five steps:

The Company accounts for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.

The Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations of licenses, products and services, some of which are distinct and are accounted for as separate performance obligations. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation, generally on a relative basis using its standalone selling price.

Nature of Products and Services

Design-to-silicon-yield solutions — The Company recognizes revenue for each element of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions as follows:

The Company generates a significant portion of its Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenue from fixed-price solution implementation service contracts delivered over a specific period of time. Revenue under project–based contracts for solution implementation services is recognized as services are performed using a percentage of completion method based on costs or labor-hours inputs, whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. Due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of costs or hours at completion is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Key factors reviewed by the Company to estimate costs to complete each contract are future labor and product costs and expected productivity efficiencies. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenues, costs,

or extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs. Losses on fixed-price solution implementation contracts are recognized in the period when they become probable. Revisions in profit estimates are reflected in the period in which the conditions that require the revisions become known and can be estimated (cumulative catch-up method).

On occasion, the Company includes its products as a component of its fixed-price service contracts. In such instances, the Company determines whether the services performed and products included, are distinct. In most cases, the arrangement is a single performance obligation and therefore follows the pattern of transfer as the service is provided. The Company applies a measure of progress (typically hours-to-hours or cost-to-cost) to any fixed consideration. As a result, revenue is generally recognized over the period the services are performed using percentage of completion method. This results in revenue recognition that corresponds with the value to the client of the services transferred to date relative to the remaining services promised.

The Company also licenses our Design-for-Inspection ("DFI") system as a separate component of fixed-price service contracts. The Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on their standalone selling prices, or SSP. In such instances, the Company applies judgment to estimate the range of SSPs for each performance obligation.

The Company licenses some of its software products separately from solution implementations, primarily its Exensio big data platform and related products.  The majority of these products are delivered as on premise software licenses, while others can be delivered entirely or partially through Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) or cloud delivery models. Revenue from perpetual (one-time charge) license software is recognized at the time of the inception of the arrangement when control transfers to the client, if the software license is distinct from the services offered by the Company. Revenue from post-contract support subscription is recognized over the contract term on a straight-line basis, because the Company is providing a service of standing ready to provide support, when-and-if needed, and is providing unspecified software upgrades on a when-and-if available basis over the contract term. Revenue from time-based license software is allocated to each performance obligation and is recognized either at a point in time or over time. The license component is recognized at the time of the delivery of the software license, with the post-contract support subscription component being recognized ratably over for the committed term of the contract. Revenue from software hosting or SaaS arrangements that allow for the use of a hosted software product or service over a contractually determined period of time without taking possession of software are accounted for as subscriptions and recognized as revenue ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the coverage period beginning on the date the service is made available to customers.

Gainshare Performance Incentives — When the Company enters into a contract to provide yield improvement services, the contract usually includes two components: (1) a fixed fee for performance by the Company of services delivered over a specific period of time; and (2) a Gainshare performance incentive component where the customer pays a variable fee, usually after the fixed fee period has ended, related to the usage of the Company's intellectual property.  Revenue derived from Gainshare performance incentives is contingent upon the Company’s customers reaching certain defined production yield levels. Gainshare performance incentive periods are usually subsequent to the delivery of all contractual services and performance obligations. The Company records Gainshare revenue as a usage-based royalty based on customers' usage of intellectual property and records it in the same period in which the usage occurs. 

The following table summarizes the effects of adopting Topic 606 on the financial statement line items of the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2018:

The following table summarizes the effects of adopting Topic 606 on the financial statement line items of the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018:

Disaggregation of revenue

In accordance with ASC 606-10-50, the Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers into geographical regions, major contract performance obligations and timing of transfer of goods and services. The Company determined that disaggregating revenue into these categories achieves the disclosure objective to depict how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.

The following table shows the revenues from contracts with customers by the nature of transactions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018:

          Product and licenses include a portion of time-based software which is recognized in the period, perpetual software and Gainshare performance incentives. The remaining portions of revenue from these contracts correspond to services or other types of performance obligations reported as either services revenue or other revenue.

Under Topic 606, the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied either over-time or at a point-in-time. Revenue from performance obligations, satisfied over time and at a point-in-time, accounted for approximately 68% and 32% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. International revenues accounted for approximately 57% and 58% of our total revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to 62% and 57% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. See Note 7. Customer and Geographic Information.

Significant Judgments

More judgments and estimates are required under Topic 606 than were required under Topic 605. Due to the complexity of certain contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under Topic 606 for the Company’s arrangements may be dependent on contract-specific terms and may vary in some instances.

In services arrangements, the Company typically satisfies the performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time. In Design-to-silicon-yield service arrangements, the performance obligation is satisfied over time either because the client controls the asset as it is created (e.g., when the asset is built at the customer site) or because the Company’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use and the Company has an enforceable right to payment plus a reasonable profit for performance completed to date. In most other services arrangements, the performance obligation is satisfied over time because the client simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided as the Company performs the services. 

For revenue under project–based contracts for fixed-price solution implementation services, revenue is recognized as services are performed using a percentage-of-completion method based on costs or labor-hours input method, whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. Due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of percentage of completion method is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Key factors reviewed by the Company to estimate costs to complete each contract are future labor and product costs and expected productivity efficiencies. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenues, costs, or extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs, and such revisions are reflected in revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis in the period in which the circumstances that gave rise to the revision become known.

The Company’s contracts with customers often include promises to transfer products, licenses and services, including professional services, technical support services, and rights to unspecified updates to a customer. Determining whether products, licenses and services are distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately, or not distinct and thus accounted for together, requires significant judgment. The Company rarely licenses or sells products on a standalone basis, so the Company is required to estimate the range of SSPs for each performance obligation. In instances where SSP is not directly observable because the Company does not sell the license, product or service separately, the Company determines the SSP using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs. The Company, in some cases, has more than one SSP for individual performance obligations. In these instances, the Company may use information such as the size of the customer and geographic region of the customer in determining the SSP.

The Company is required to record Gainshare royalty revenue in the same period in which the usage occurs. Because the Company generally does not receive the acknowledgment reports during a given quarter within the time frame necessary to adequately review the reports and include the actual amounts in quarterly results for such quarter, the Company accrues the related revenue based on estimates of customer's underlying sales achievement. The Company estimation process can be based on historical data, trends, seasonality, changes in the contract rate, knowledge of the changes in the industry and changes in the customer’s manufacturing environment learned through discussions with customers and sales personnel. As a result of accruing revenue for the quarter based on such estimates, adjustments will be required in the following quarter to true-up revenue to the actual amounts reported.

   Contract Balances  

The Company performs its obligation under a contract with a customer by transferring products or services in exchange for consideration from the customer. The timing of the Company’s performance often differs from the timing of the customer’s payment, which results in the recognition of a receivable, a contract asset or a contract liability. The Company classifies the right to consideration in exchange for products or services transferred to a client as either a receivable or a contract asset. A receivable is a right to consideration that is unconditional as compared to a contract asset which is a right to consideration that is conditional upon factors other than the passage of time. The majority of the Company’s contract assets represent unbilled amounts related to fixed-price solution implementation service contracts when the costs or labor-hours input method of revenue recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the client, and the right to consideration is subject to milestone completion or client acceptance. The contract assets are generally classified as current and are recorded on a net basis with deferred revenue (i.e., contract liabilities) at the contract level. The contract assets is included in prepaid expenses and other in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2018 and January 1, 2018, contract assets of $3.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively, are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The change in the contract assets balance during the period relates to the recording of revenues for which the right to consideration is subject to milestone completion or client acceptance and movement of previously recorded contract assets to receivables as the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Deferred revenues consist substantially of amounts invoiced in advance of revenue recognition and is recognized as the revenue recognition criteria are met. Deferred revenues that will be recognized during the succeeding twelve month period is recorded as current deferred revenues and the remaining portion is recorded as non- current deferred revenues. This balance was recorded in the other non-current liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Non-current portion of deferred revenue was $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2018 and January 1, 2018.

           During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized $5.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively, of revenue that was included in the deferred revenue balance, as adjusted for Topic 606, at the beginning of 2018.

 At June 30, 2018, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations related to customer contracts that were unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied was approximately $45.3 million. Given the applicable contract terms, the majority of this amount is expected to be recognized as revenue over the next 2 years, with the remainder in the following 5 years.  This amount does not include contracts to which the customer is not committed, nor contracts with original expected lengths of one year or less, nor contracts for which we recognize revenue equal to the amount we have the right to invoice for services performed, or future sales-based or usage-based royalty payments in exchange for a license of intellectual property. This amount is subject to change due to future revaluations of variable consideration, terminations, other contract modifications, or currency adjustments.  The estimated timing of the recognition of remaining unsatisfied performance obligations is subject to change and are affected by changes to the scope, change in timing of delivery of products and services, or contract modifications.

Payment terms and conditions vary by contract type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within 30 to 90 days. In instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that its contracts generally do not include a significant financing component. The primary purpose of invoicing terms is to provide customers with simplified and predictable ways of purchasing the Company’s products and services, and not to facilitate financing arrangements.

The amount of revenue recognized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 from performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in previous periods was ($0.2) million and $0.3 million, respectively. This amount primarily represents changes of estimated  percentage-of –completion based contracts and changes in estimated Gainshare performance incentives for those customers that reported actual Gainshare revenue with some time lag.

Costs to obtain or fulfill a contract

The Company capitalizes the incremental costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer, including direct sales commissions and related fees, when it expects to recover those costs. As a result, these costs will need to be capitalized and amortized over an appropriate period, which may exceed the initial contract term. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are costs that would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained. The Company uses the portfolio method to recognize the amortization expense related to these capitalized costs related to initial contracts and renewals and such expense is recognized over the period associated with the revenue of the related portfolio. Total capitalized direct sales commission costs as of June 30, 2018 were $0.5 million and the amortization of these assets were $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. There was no impairment loss in relation to the costs capitalized for the periods presented. Certain eligible initial project costs are capitalized when the costs relate directly to the contract, the costs generate or enhance resources of the company that will be used in satisfying the performance obligation in the future, and the costs are expected to be recovered. These costs primarily consist of transition and set-up costs related to the installation of systems and processes and other deferred fulfillment costs eligible for capitalization.  Capitalized costs are amortized consistent with the transfer to the client of the services to which the asset relates and recorded as a component of cost of revenues. The Company also incurred certain direct costs to provide solution implementation services in relation to the specific anticipated contracts. The Company recognizes such costs as a component of cost of revenues, the timing of which is dependent upon identification of a contract arrangement. The Company also defers costs from arrangements that required us to defer the revenues, typically due to the pattern of transfer of the performance obligations in the contract. These costs are recognized in proportion to the related revenue. At the end of the reporting period, the Company evaluates its deferred costs for their probable recoverability. The Company recognizes impairment of deferred costs when it is determined that the costs no longer have future benefits and are no longer recoverable. Deferred costs balance was $0.4 million and $0.6 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The balance was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other non-current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

3. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS 

Accounts receivable include amounts that are unbilled at the end of the period that are expected to be billed and collected within a 12-month period. Unbilled accounts receivable, included in accounts receivable, totaled $23.2 million and $22.2 million as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable that are not expected to be billed and collected during the succeeding 12-month period are recorded in other non-current assets and totaled $7.3 million and $8.6 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. 

Property and equipment, net consists of (in thousands): 

Test equipment includes DFI assets at customer sites that are contributing to DFI solution revenues. The construction-in-progress balance as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was primarily related to construction of DFI assets. Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.5 million and $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  

As of both June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, the carrying amount of goodwill was $1.9 million.

Intangible assets balance was $5.6 million and $6.1 million as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively. Intangible assets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consist of the following (in thousands):

The weighted average amortization period for acquired identifiable intangible assets was 6.31 years as of June 30, 2018. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, total intangible asset amortization expense was $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, total intangible asset amortization expense was $0.2 million and $0.4 million respectively. The Company expects annual amortization of acquired identifiable intangible assets to be as follows (in thousands):

Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, there were no indicators of impairment related to the Company’s intangible assets.

4. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Stock-based compensation is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, generally four years. Stock-based compensation expense before taxes related to the Company’s stock plans and employee stock purchase plan was allocated as follows (in thousands): 

On June 30, 2018, the Company had the following stock-based compensation plans:

Stock Plans — At the annual meeting of stockholders on November 16, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which was most recently amended and restated at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders on May 31, 2017, when the Company’s stockholders approved the Fourth Amended and Restated 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2011 Plan”). Under the 2011 Plan, the Company may award stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock grants or stock units covering shares of the Company's common stock to employees, directors, non-employee directors and contractors. The aggregate number of shares reserved for awards under this plan is 7,800,000 shares, plus up to 3,500,000 shares previously issued under the 2001 Plan that are forfeited or repurchased by the Company or shares subject to awards previously issued under the 2001 Stock Plan (the "2001 Plan") that expire or that terminate without having been exercised or settled in full on or after November 16, 2011. In case of awards other than options or stock appreciation rights, the aggregate number of shares reserved under the plan will be decreased at a rate of 1.33 shares issued pursuant to such awards. The exercise price for stock options must generally be at prices no less than the fair market value at the date of grant. Stock options generally expire ten years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable over a four-year period.

In 2001, the Company adopted a 2001 Plan. In 2003, in connection with its acquisition of IDS Systems Inc., the Company assumed IDS’ 2001 Stock Option / Stock Issuance Plan (the “IDS Plan”). Both of the 2001 and the IDS Plans expired in 2011. Stock options granted under the 2001 and IDS Plans generally expire ten years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable over a four -year period. Although no new awards may be granted under the 2001 or IDS Plans, awards made under the 2001 and IDS Plans that are currently outstanding remain subject to the terms of each such plan.   

As of June 30, 2018, 9.6 million shares of common stock were reserved to cover stock-based awards under the 2011 Plan, of which 4.1 million shares were available for future grant. The number of shares reserved and available under the 2011 Plan includes 0.5 million shares that were subject to awards previously made under the 2001 Plan which were forfeited, expired or repurchased by the Company after adoption of the 2011 Plan through June 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2018, there were no outstanding awards that had been granted outside of the 2011, 2001 or the IDS Plans (collectively, the "Stock Plans"). 

The Company estimated the fair value of share-based awards granted under the 2011 Stock Plan during the period using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, resulting in the following weighted average fair values: 

No stock options were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2018.

Stock option activity under the Company’s Stock Plans during the six months ended June 30, 2018, was as follows:

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of $11.98 per share as of June 30, 2018. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2018, was $0.3 million.

As of June 30, 2018, there was $0.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.0 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2018, was $0.2 million.

Restricted stock unit activity during the six months ended June 30, 2018, was as follows:

As of June 30, 2018, there was $15.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding restricted stock units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years. Restricted stock units do not have rights to dividends prior to vesting.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan — In July 2001, the Company adopted a ten-year Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended, the “Purchase Plan”) under which eligible employees can contribute up to 10% of their compensation, as defined in the Purchase Plan, towards the purchase of shares of PDF common stock at a price of 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning of the offering period or the end of the purchase period. The Purchase Plan consists of twenty-four-month offering periods with four six-month purchase periods in each offering period. Under the Purchase Plan, on January 1 of each year, starting with 2002, the number of shares reserved for issuance will automatically increase by the lesser of (1) 675,000 shares, (2) 2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding year, or (3) the number of shares determined by the board of directors. At the annual meeting of stockholders on May 18, 2010, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Purchase Plan to extend it through May 17, 2020. 

The Company estimated the fair value of purchase rights granted under the Purchase Plan during the period using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, resulting in the following weighted average fair values:

During the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, no shares were issued under the Purchase Plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, a total of 108,000 and 100,000 shares, respectively, were issued at a weighted-average purchase price of $9.29 and $9.13 per share, respectively. As of June 30, 2018, there was $1.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the Purchase Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.58 years. As of June 30, 2018, 4.2 million shares were available for future issuance under the Purchase Plan.   

Stock Repurchase Program - On May 29, 2018, the Board of Directors terminated the previous 2016 program, and adopted a new 2018 program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock both on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions, from time to time, over the next two years. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company repurchased 98,800 and 437,007 shares, respectively, under the 2016 program. As of June 30, 2018, 1,279,189 shares had been repurchased at an average price of $14.59 per share under the 2016 program, for a total purchase of $18.7 million. Under the 2018 program, as of June 30,.2018, $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock remained available for future repurchases. 

5. INCOME TAXES  

Income tax benefit decreased $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 to a $0.8 million compared to $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company’s effective tax rate benefit was 23% and 156% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate benefit decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, primarily due to lower excess tax benefits related to employee stock compensation and the impact of the recently enacted TCJA, such as a decrease in the maximum federal tax rate from 35% to 21%.

The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, as of June 30, 2018, was $13.0 million, of which $7.7 million, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, as of December 31, 2017, was $12.9 million, of which $7.7 million, if recognized, would affect the Company's effective tax rate. As of June 30, 2018, the Company has recorded unrecognized tax benefits of $2.9 million, including interest and penalties, as long-term taxes payable in its condensed consolidated balance sheet. The remaining $10.8 million has been recorded net of our deferred tax assets, of which $5.3 million is subject to a full valuation allowance. 

The valuation allowance was approximately $9.5 million and $9.1 million as of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively, which was related to California R&D tax credits and California net operating losses related to the Company's acquisition of Syntricity that it currently does not believe are more likely than not to be ultimately realized.

         The Company is required to assess whether it is more-likely-than-not that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and if the Company believes that they are not likely to be realizable before the expiration dates applicable to such assets then, to the extent the Company believes that recovery is not likely, establish a valuation allowance. Changes in the net deferred tax assets, less offsetting valuation allowance, in a financial reporting period are recorded through the income tax provision and could have a material impact to the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In December 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118), which allows companies to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend more than one year beyond the TCJA enactment date. Since the TCJA was passed late in the fourth quarter of 2017, and ongoing guidance and accounting interpretation are expected during the year, we consider the accounting for deferred tax remeasurements, the impact of the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial system and other provisions to be incomplete. There have been no material changes to the provisional adjustments disclosed in our 2017 Form 10-K. The Company is continuing to evaluate the estimates used to record and disclose the effects of the TCJA.

Effective January 1, 2018, the TCJA creates a new requirement to include in U.S. income global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”). The GILTI must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. Under U.S. GAAP, we are allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). During the first quarter of 2018, the Company selected the period cost method in recording the tax effects of GILTI in its financial statements.

The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state and foreign jurisdictions. Because the Company used some of the tax attributes carried forward from previous years to tax years that are still open, statutes of limitation remain open for all tax years to the extent of the attributes carried forward into tax year 2002 for federal and California tax purposes. The Company is not subject to income tax examinations in any of its major foreign subsidiaries’ jurisdictions.

6. NET INCOME PER SHARE

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (excluding outstanding stock options and shares subject to repurchase). Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the potential effect of dilutive securities which are convertible into common shares (using the treasury stock method), except in cases in which the effect would be anti-dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands except per share amount): 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, there are no potential dilutive common shares included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share because there was a net loss for both periods.

The following table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the diluted net income per share calculation above because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods indicated (in thousands):  

  7. CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker, the chief executive officer, reviews discrete financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of regularly making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. Accordingly, the Company considers itself to be in one operating segment, specifically the licensing and implementation of yield improvement solutions for companies designing and/or manufacturing integrated circuits. 

The Company had revenues from individual customers in excess of 10% of total revenues as follows: 

The Company had gross accounts receivable from individual customers in excess of 10% of gross accounts receivable as follows: 

Revenues from customers by geographic area based on the location of the customers’ work sites are as follows (in thousands):

Long-lived assets, net by geographic area are as follows (in thousands):

8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value is the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The multiple assumptions used to value financial instruments are referred to as inputs, and a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value is established, that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon its own market assumptions. These inputs are ranked according to a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.

The following table represents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018, and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):

The following table represents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017, and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, primarily on third-party accounts payables and intercompany balances. The primary objective of the Company’s hedging program is to reduce volatility of earnings related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The counterparty to these foreign currency forward contracts is a large global financial institution that the Company believes is creditworthy, and therefore, the Company believes the credit risk of counterparty nonperformance is not significant. These foreign currency forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. Therefore, the change in fair value of these contracts is recorded into earnings as a component of other income (expense), net, and offsets the change in fair value of the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, which is also recorded in other income (expense), net. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized a realized loss of $0.6 million and a realized gain $0.4 million on the contracts, respectively, which was recorded in other income (expense), net in the Company’s Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recognized a realized loss of $0.4 million and a realized gain $0.5 million on the contracts, respectively, which was recorded in other income (expense), net in the Company’s Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.  

The Company carries these derivatives financial instruments on its Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are classified as Level 2 because it is not actively traded and the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had one outstanding forward contract with a notional amount of $8.1 million and recorded $35,000 other current liabilities associated with this outstanding forward contract. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had one outstanding forward contract with a notional amount of $8.2 million and recorded $12,000 other current assets associated with the outstanding forward contract.  

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

The Company leases administrative and sales offices and certain equipment under noncancelable operating leases, which contain various renewal options and, in some cases, require payment of common area costs, taxes and utilities. These operating leases expire at various times through 2028. Rent expense was $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Rent expense was $1.3 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  

Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases at June 30, 2018, are as follows (in thousands): 

In April 2018, the Company entered into a new approximately 20,800 square foot lease, located in Santa Clara, California. The term of the new lease is approximately ten years commencing on or around September 1, 2018. Total lease obligation over the new lease term is approximately $7.0 million, less a lease abatement allowance of approximately $0.4 million. The terms of the new lease include a tenant improvement allowance of approximately $1.3 million. Future minimum lease payments under the lease are included in the above table.

Indemnifications — The Company generally provides a warranty to its customers that its software will perform substantially in accordance with documented specifications typically for a period of 90 days following initial delivery of its products. The Company also indemnifies certain customers from third-party claims of intellectual property infringement relating to the use of its products. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant. The Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on its future results of operations.

 Purchase obligations — The Company has purchase obligations with certain suppliers for the purchase of goods and services entered in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2018, total outstanding purchase obligations were $13.7 million, which are primarily due within the next 12 months.

Indemnification of Officers and Directors  — As permitted by the Delaware general corporation law, the Company has included a provision in its certificate of incorporation to eliminate the personal liability of its officers and directors for monetary damages for breach or alleged breach of their fiduciary duties as officers or directors, other than in cases of fraud or other willful misconduct.

In addition, the Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company is required to indemnify its officers and directors even when indemnification would otherwise be discretionary, and the Company is required to advance expenses to its officers and directors as incurred in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors containing provisions that are in some respects broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware general corporation law. The indemnification agreements require the Company to indemnify its officers and directors against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as officers and directors other than for liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature, to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified, and to obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance if available on reasonable terms. The Company has obtained directors’ and officers’ liability insurance in amounts comparable to other companies of the Company’s size and in the Company’s industry. Since a maximum obligation of the Company is not explicitly stated in the Company’s Bylaws or in its indemnification agreements and will depend on the facts and circumstances that arise out of any future claims, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated.

Litigation — From time to time, the Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues for losses related to litigation when a potential loss is probable and the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with FASB requirements. As of June 30, 2018, the Company was not party to any material legal proceedings, thus no loss was probable and no amount was accrued.