10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2008
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
No. 001-33732
Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
United States of America
|
|
42-1572539
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1410 St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey
|
|
07001
|
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices)
|
|
Zip Code
|
(732)
499-7200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
|
|
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by
reference to price at which the common equity was last sold on
June 30, 2008 was $481,632,906.
As of March 2, 2009, there were outstanding
45,544,061 shares of the Registrants common stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
the Registrant (Part III).
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
Forward
Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking
statements, which can be identified by the use of such
words as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan,
seek, and similar expressions. These forward looking statements
include:
|
|
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions, and expectations;
|
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans and prospects and growth
and operating strategies;
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the quality of our assets, including our
loan and investment portfolios; and
|
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
|
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant
risks, assumptions, and uncertainties, including, among other
things, the following important factors that could affect the
actual outcome of future events:
|
|
|
|
|
significantly increased competition among depository and other
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that
reduce our interest margins or reduce the fair value of
financial instruments;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market
areas, that are worse than expected;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets;
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our
business;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and take advantage
of growth opportunities, and the possible dilutive effect of
potential acquisitions or de novo branches, if any;
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted
by bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board, or other promulgating authorities;
|
|
|
|
inability of third-party providers to perform their obligations
to us; and
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans.
|
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future
results may be materially different from the results indicated
by these forward-looking statements.
Northfield
Bancorp, MHC
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is a federally-chartered mutual holding
company and owns 55.0% of the outstanding shares of common stock
of Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as of December 31, 2008.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC has not engaged in any significant
business activity other than owning the common stock of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc., and does not intend to expand its
business activities at this time. So long as Northfield Bancorp,
MHC exists, it is required to own a majority of the voting stock
of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. The home office of Northfield
Bancorp, MHC is located at 1731 Victory Boulevard, Staten
Island, New York, and its telephone number is
(718) 448-1000.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is subject to comprehensive regulation
and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a federal corporation that completed
its initial public stock offering on November 7, 2007.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s home office is located at 1410
St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey 07001 and the telephone
number is
(732) 499-7200.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s significant business
1
activities have been holding the common stock of Northfield Bank
(the Bank) and investing the proceeds from its initial public
offering in short-term investments. Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as
the holding company of Northfield Bank, is authorized to pursue
other business activities permitted by applicable laws and
regulations for subsidiaries of federally-chartered mutual
holding companies, which may include the acquisition of banking
and financial services companies. We have no plans for any
mergers or acquisitions, or other diversification of the
activities of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at the present time. In
addition to the Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. also owns
Northfield Investments, Inc., a New Jersey investment company,
which currently is inactive. When we use the term
Company, We, or Our we are
referring to the activities of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries. When we refer to the holding company
we are referring to the stand-alone activities of Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. When we refer to the Bank we are
referring to the activities of Northfield Bank and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
Our cash flow depends on the cash proceeds we retained from our
initial public stock offering, earnings on our investments, and
from dividends received from Northfield Bank. Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. neither owns nor leases any property from outside
parties, but instead uses the premises, equipment, and furniture
of Northfield Bank. At the present time, we employ as officers
only certain persons who are also officers of Northfield Bank
and we use the support staff of Northfield Bank from time to
time. These persons are not separately compensated by Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. reimburses Northfield
Bank for significant costs incurred by the Bank on its behalf.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may hire additional employees, as
appropriate, to the extent it expands its business in the future.
Northfield
Bank
Northfield Bank was organized in 1887 and is currently a
federally chartered savings bank. Northfield Bank conducts
business from its home office located at 1731 Victory Boulevard,
Staten Island, New York and its 17 additional branch offices
located in New York and New Jersey. The branch offices are
located in the New York counties of Richmond (Staten Island) and
Kings (Brooklyn) and the New Jersey counties of Union and
Middlesex. The telephone number at Northfield Banks home
office is
(718) 448-1000.
Northfield Banks principal business consists of
originating commercial real estate loans and multifamily real
estate loans, purchasing investment securities including
mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds, as well as
depositing funds in other financial institutions. Northfield
Bank also offers construction and land loans, commercial and
industrial loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage
loans, and home equity loans and lines of credit. Northfield
Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts, including
certificates of deposit, passbook, statement, and money market
savings accounts, transactions deposit accounts (Negotiable
Orders of Withdrawal (NOW) accounts and non-interest bearing
demand accounts), and individual retirement accounts. Deposits
are Northfield Banks primary source of funds for its
lending and investing activities. Northfield Bank also uses
borrowed funds as a source of funds, principally from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. In addition to traditional
banking services, Northfield Bank offers insurance products
through NSB Insurance Agency, Inc. Northfield Bank owns 100% of
NSB Services Corp., which, in turn, owns 100% of the voting
common stock of a real estate investment trust, NSB Realty
Trust, which holds mortgage loans and other investments.
Available
Information
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a public company, and files interim,
quarterly, and annual reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These respective reports are on file and a matter of
public record with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
may be read and copied at the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an Internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements,
and other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC
(http://www.sec.gov).
2
Our website address is www.eNorthfield.com. Information
on our website should not be considered a part of this annual
report.
Market
Area and Competition
We have been in business for over 120 years, offering a
variety of financial products and services to meet the needs of
the communities we serve. Our retail banking network consists of
multiple delivery channels including full-service banking
offices, automated teller machines, and telephone and internet
banking capabilities. We consider our competitive products and
pricing, branch network, reputation for superior customer
service, and financial strength, as our major strengths in
attracting and retaining customers in our market areas.
We face intense competition in our market areas both in making
loans and attracting deposits. Our market areas have a high
concentration of financial institutions, including large money
center and regional banks, community banks, and credit unions.
We face additional competition for deposits from money market
funds, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and insurance companies.
Some of our competitors offer products and services that we do
not offer, such as trust services and private banking.
In addition, recent turmoil in the United States and world
economies, and more specifically in the financial services
industry, has resulted in financial services companies such as
investment banking institutions, and automobile and real estate
finance companies, electing to become bank holding companies.
These financial services companies have traditionally received
their funding from sources other than insured bank deposits.
Many of the alternative funding sources traditionally utilized
by these companies is no longer available and has resulted in
these companies relying more on insured bank deposits to fund
their operations, increasing competition for deposits and
related costs of such deposits.
Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the
communities surrounding our banking offices in the, New York
Counties of Richmond (Staten Island) and Kings (Brooklyn), and
Union, and Middlesex Counties in New Jersey. As of June 30,
2008 (the latest date for which information is publicly
available), we ranked fifth in deposit market share, with a
7.61% market share, in the Staten Island market area. In
Middlesex and Union Counties in New Jersey, as of June 30,
2008, we ranked 23rd, on a combined basis, with a 0.66% market
share.
Lending
Activities
Our principal lending activity is the origination of commercial
real estate loans and multifamily real estate loans. We also
originate one- to four-family residential real estate loans,
construction and land loans, commercial and industrial loans,
and home equity loans and lines of credit.
3
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following
table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio, by type
of loan at the dates indicated, excluding loans held for sale of
$0, $270,000, $125,000, $0, and $99,000 at December 31,
2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
289,123
|
|
|
|
49.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
243,902
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
207,680
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
%
|
|
$
|
165,657
|
|
|
|
42.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
125,033
|
|
|
|
38.98
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
103,128
|
|
|
|
17.49
|
|
|
|
95,246
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
107,572
|
|
|
|
26.29
|
|
|
|
127,477
|
|
|
|
32.87
|
|
|
|
131,358
|
|
|
|
40.95
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
52,158
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
44,850
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
52,124
|
|
|
|
12.74
|
|
|
|
52,890
|
|
|
|
13.64
|
|
|
|
27,898
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
108,534
|
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
14,164
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
14,105
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
|
|
12,506
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
24,182
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
12,797
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
13,922
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
16,105
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
17,027
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
11,397
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
11,022
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
8,068
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
3,597
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
3,510
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
589,489
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
424,198
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
409,193
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
387,812
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
320,744
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs (fees), net
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,166
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
$
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
404,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
382,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
317,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Portfolio Maturities. The following table
summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio at
December 31, 2008. Demand loans (loans having no stated
repayment schedule or maturity) and overdraft loans are reported
as being due in the year ending December 31, 2009.
Maturities are based on the final contractual payment date and
do not reflect the effect of prepayments and scheduled principal
amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
One- to Four-Family Residential
|
|
|
Land Loans
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Due during the years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
12,139
|
|
|
|
6.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
|
7.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,569
|
|
|
|
6.78
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
6.83
|
|
|
|
17,153
|
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
6 ,201
|
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
5.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
7.95
|
|
2012 to 2013
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
2014 to 2018
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
21,993
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
6.72
|
|
2019 to 2023
|
|
|
22,385
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
|
|
17,155
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,844
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
2024 and beyond
|
|
|
231,845
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
|
|
|
58,907
|
|
|
|
5.79
|
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
89,724
|
|
|
|
5.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
289,123
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
103,128
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,158
|
|
|
|
6.17
|
%
|
|
$
|
108,534
|
|
|
|
5.85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity and Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Credit
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Due during the years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
|
5.94
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,092
|
|
|
|
6.48
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
$
|
43,515
|
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
2010
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
1,963
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
7.14
|
|
|
|
29,953
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
2011
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
|
|
|
1,713
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
8,691
|
|
|
|
6.30
|
|
2012 to 2013
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
6.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,600
|
|
|
|
6.03
|
|
2014 to 2018
|
|
|
4,415
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
7.46
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
39,447
|
|
|
|
5.97
|
|
2019 to 2023
|
|
|
6,783
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,432
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
2024 and beyond
|
|
|
9,444
|
|
|
|
5.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,851
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,182
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
6.49
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
$
|
589,489
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of
fixed- and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2008, that
are contractually due after December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
Adjustable Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
20,764
|
|
|
$
|
256,220
|
|
|
$
|
276,984
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
54,174
|
|
|
|
48,496
|
|
|
|
102,670
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
25,573
|
|
|
|
26,589
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
6,397
|
|
|
|
102,137
|
|
|
|
108,534
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
11,332
|
|
|
|
24,128
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
6,933
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
97,687
|
|
|
$
|
448,287
|
|
|
$
|
545,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Prior to 2008
our principal lending activity had been the origination of
commercial real estate loans. During 2008, the Company focused
on originating multifamily real estate loans. Commercial real
estate loans totaled $289.1 million, or 49.05% of our loan
portfolio as of December 31, 2008. Commercial real estate
loans at December 31, 2008 included $31.3 million in
hotels and motels, $44.6 million in office buildings, and
$128.9 million in owner-occupied businesses. At
December 31, 2008, our commercial real estate loan
portfolio consisted of 333 loans with an average loan balance of
approximately $868,000 although there are a large number of
loans with balances substantially greater than this average. At
December 31, 2008, our largest commercial real estate loan
had a principal balance of $9.9 million, and was secured by
a hotel. At December 31, 2008, this loan was performing in
accordance with its original contractual terms.
Substantially all of our commercial real estate loans are
secured by properties located in our primary market areas.
Our commercial real estate loans typically amortize over 20- to
25-years
with interest rates that adjust after an initial five- or
10-year
period, and every five years thereafter. Margins generally range
from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the
average yield on United States Treasury securities, adjusted to
a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the Federal
Reserve Board. Recently, variable rate loan originations have
been indexed to the five year London Interbank Offering Rate
(LIBOR) swaps rate plus a negotiated margin, as published in the
Federal Reserve Statistical Release. We also originate, to
lesser extent, 10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our commercial
real estate loans have interest rate floors
5
equal to the interest rate on the date the loan is originated,
and have prepayment penalties should the loan be repaid in the
first three to five years.
In the underwriting of commercial real estate loans, we lend up
to the lesser of 75% of the propertys appraised value or
purchase price. We base our decision to lend primarily on the
economic viability of the property and the creditworthiness of
the borrower. In evaluating a proposed commercial real estate
loan, we emphasize the ratio of the propertys projected
net cash flow to the loans debt service requirement
(generally requiring a minimum ratio of 120%), computed after
deduction for a vacancy factor, where applicable, and property
expenses we deem appropriate. Personal guarantees are usually
obtained from commercial real estate borrowers. We require title
insurance, fire and extended coverage casualty insurance, and,
if appropriate, flood insurance, in order to protect our
security interest in the underlying property. Although a
significant portion of our commercial real estate loans are
referred by brokers, we underwrite all commercial real estate
loans in accordance with our underwriting standards.
Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher interest
rates and have shorter terms than one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans
generally have greater credit risks compared to one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, as they typically
involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers
or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment of
loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends
on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the
loan generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income
from the property to cover operating expenses and debt service.
Changes in economic conditions that are not in the control of
the borrower or lender could affect the value of the collateral
for the loan or the future cash flow of the property.
Additionally, any decline in real estate values may be more
pronounced for commercial real estate than residential
properties.
Multifamily Real Estate Loans. Loans secured
by multifamily and mixed use properties real estate loans
totaled approximately $108.5 million, or 18.41% of our
total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2008. Mixed use
properties classified as mulitfamily are defined by the Company
as having more than four residential family units and a business
or businesses. At December 31, 2008, we had 100 multifamily
real estate loans with an average loan balance of approximately
$1.1 million. At December 31, 2008, our largest
multifamily real estate loan had a principal balance of
$8.0 million and was performing in accordance with its
original contractual terms. Substantially all of our multifamily
real estate loans are secured by properties located in our
market areas.
Our multifamily real estate loans typically amortize over 20- to
25-years
with interest rates that adjust after an initial five- or
10-year
period, and every five years thereafter. Margins generally range
from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the
average yield on United States Treasury securities, adjusted to
a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the Federal
Reserve Board. Recently, variable rate loan originations have
been indexed to the five year LIBOR swaps rate plus a negotiated
margin, as published in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release.
We also originate, to lesser extent, 10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our multifamily
real estate loans have interest rate floors equal to the
interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and have
prepayment penalties should the loan be prepaid in the first
three to five years.
In underwriting multifamily real estate loans, we consider a
number of factors, including the projected net cash flow to the
loans debt service requirement (generally requiring a
minimum ratio of 115%), the age and condition of the collateral,
the financial resources and income level of the borrower, and
the borrowers experience in owning or managing similar
properties. Multifamily real estate loans are originated in
amounts up to 75% of the appraised value of the property
securing the loan. We typically do not obtain personal
guarantees from multifamily real estate borrowers.
Loans secured by multifamily real estate properties generally
have greater credit risk than one- to four-family residential
real estate loans. This increased credit risk is a result of
several factors, including the concentration of principal in a
limited number of loans and borrowers, the effects of general
economic conditions on income producing properties, and the
increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of
loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by
multifamily real estate properties typically
6
depends on the successful operation of the property. If the cash
flow from the project is reduced, the borrowers ability to
repay the loan may be impaired.
Construction and Land Loans. At
December 31, 2008, construction and land loans totaled
$52.2 million, or 8.85% of total loans receivable. At
December 31, 2008, the additional unadvanced portion of
these construction loans totaled $20.1 million. At
December 31, 2008, we had 63 construction and loan loans
with an average loan balance of approximately $828,000. At
December 31, 2008, our largest construction and land loan
had a principal balance of $5.0 million and was for the
purpose of purchasing land. This loan is performing in
accordance with its original contractual terms.
Our construction and land loans are typically interest only
loans with interest rates that are tied to an index that
typically is prime. Margins generally range from zero basis
points to 200 basis points above the prime rate index. We
also originate, to lesser extent, 10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing land loans. In general, our
construction and land loans have interest rate floors equal to
the interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and we do
not typically charge prepayment penalties.
We grant construction and land loans to experienced developers
for the construction of single-family residences including
condominiums, and commercial properties. Construction and land
loans are also made to individuals for the construction of their
personal residences. Advances on construction loans are made in
accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction,
but are generally limited to a
loan-to-completed-appraised-value
ratio of 70%. Repayment of construction loans on residential
properties is normally expected from the sale of units to
individual purchasers or in the case of individuals building
their own, with a permanent mortgage. In the case of
income-producing property, repayment is usually expected from
permanent financing upon completion of construction. We
typically offer the permanent mortgage financing on our
construction loans on income-producing properties.
Land loans also help finance the purchase of land intended for
future development, including single-family houses, multifamily
housing, and commercial property. In some cases, we may make an
acquisition loan before the borrower has received approval to
develop the land. In general, the maximum
loan-to-value
ratio for a land acquisition loan is 50% of the appraised value
of the property, and the maximum term of these loans is two
years. If the maturity of the loan exceeds two years, the loan
must be an amortizing loan.
In underwriting a construction loan, we require an appraisal of
the property by a independent licensed appraiser approved by the
Companys board of directors . We review and inspect
properties before disbursement of funds during the term of a
construction loan.
Construction and land loans generally carry higher interest
rates have shorter terms than one- to four- family residential
real estate loans. Construction and land loans have greater
credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied
real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely
upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the
property at completion of construction compared to the estimated
cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions.
If the estimate of construction costs is inaccurate, we may
decide to advance additional funds beyond the amount originally
committed in order to protect the value of the property.
Moreover, if the estimated value of the completed project is
inaccurate, the borrower may hold a property with a value that
is insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction
loan upon the sale of the property. In the event we make a land
acquisition loan on property that is not yet approved for the
planned development, there is the risk that approvals will not
be granted or will be delayed. Construction loans also expose us
to the risk that improvements will not be completed on time in
accordance with specifications and projected costs. In addition,
the ultimate sale or rental of the property may not occur as
anticipated and the market value of collateral, when completed,
may be less that the outstanding loans against the property.
Substantially all of our construction and land loans are secured
by property located in our primary market areas.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. At
December 31, 2008, commercial and industrial loans totaled
$11.0 million, or 1.87% of the total loan portfolio. As of
December 31, 2008, we had 61 commercial and industrial
loans with an average loan balance of approximately $181,000,
although we originate these types of loans in amounts
substantially greater and smaller than this average. At
December 31, 2008, our largest
7
commercial and industrial loan had a principal balance of
$1.0 million and was performing in accordance with its
original contractual terms.
Our commercial and industrial loans typically amortize over
10 years with interest rates that are tied to an index that
is typically prime. Margins generally range from zero basis
points to 300 basis points above the prime rate index. We
also originate, to lesser extent, 10 year fixed-rate, fully
amortizing loans. In general, our commercial and industrial
loans have interest rate floors equal to the interest rate on
the date the loan is originated and have prepayment penalties.
We make various types of secured and unsecured commercial and
industrial loans to customers in our market area for the purpose
of working capital and other general business purposes. The
terms of these loans generally range from less than one year to
a maximum of 15 years. The loans are either negotiated on a
fixed-rate basis or carry adjustable interest rates indexed to a
market rate index.
Commercial credit decisions are based on our credit assessment
of the applicant. We evaluate the applicants ability to
repay in accordance with the proposed terms of the loan and
assess the risks involved. Personal guarantees of the principals
are typically obtained. In addition to evaluating the loan
applicants financial statements, we consider the adequacy
of the primary and secondary sources of repayment for the loan.
Credit agency reports of the guarantors personal credit history
supplement our analysis of the applicants
creditworthiness. We also perform credit checks with other banks
and conduct trade investigations. Collateral supporting a
secured transaction also is analyzed to determine its
marketability.
Commercial and industrial loans generally carry higher interest
rates than one- to four- family residential real estate loans of
like maturity because they have a higher risk of default since
their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of
the borrowers business. Commercial and industrial loans
have greater credit risk than one- to four- family residential
real estate loans.
One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate
Loans. At December 31, 2008, we had 654 one-
to four-family residential real estate loans outstanding with an
aggregate balance of $103.1 million, or 17.49% of our total
loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2008, the average
balance of one- to four-family residential mortgage real estate
loans was approximately $158,000, although we originate this
type of loan in amounts substantially greater and smaller than
this average. At December 31, 2008, our largest loan of
this type had a principal balance of $2.5 million and was
performing in accordance with its original terms.
One- to four-family residential mortgage real estate loans are
generally underwritten according to Freddie Mac guidelines using
their proprietary automated underwriting software
LP, and we refer to loans that conform to such
guidelines as conforming loans. We generally
originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate loans in amounts up to
the maximum conforming loan limits as established by the Office
of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which is $417,0000 as
of December 31, 2008 for single-family homes. We also
originate loans above the lending limit for conforming loans,
which are referred to as jumbo loans. Jumbo loans
are common in our market area. We originate fixed-rate jumbo
loans with terms up to 15 years and adjustable-rate jumbo
loans with an initial fixed-rate period of 10 years. We
generally underwrite jumbo loans in a manner similar to
conforming loans. These loans are generally eligible for sale to
various firms that specialize in purchasing non-conforming
loans. Jumbo loans are common in our market area although we
have never sold jumbo loans to any third parties.
We will originate loans with
loan-to-value
ratios in excess of 80%, up to and including a
loan-to-value
ratio of 95%. We require private mortgage insurance for all
loans with
loan-to-value
ratios exceeding 80%. Generally, we will retain in our portfolio
loans with
loan-to-value
ratios up to and including 90%, and sell loans with
loan-to-value
ratios that exceed 90%. We currently retain the servicing rights
on loans sold which generates fee income or income tax credits.
We do not offer interest only mortgage loans on one-
to four-family residential properties, where the borrower pays
interest for an initial period, after which the loan converts to
a fully amortizing loan. We also do not offer loans that provide
for negative amortization of principal, such as Option
ARM loans, where the borrower can pay less than the
interest owed on their loan, resulting in an increased principal
balance during the life of the loan. We do not offer
subprime loans (loans that generally target
borrowers with weakened
8
credit histories typically characterized by payment
delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or
borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by
low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios).
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. At
December 31, 2008, we had 361 home equity loans and lines
of credits with an aggregate outstanding balance of
$24.2 million, or 4.10% of our total loan portfolio,
including the outstanding balance of home equity lines of credit
of $9.9 million, or 1.68% of our total loan portfolio. At
December 31, 2008, the average home equity loans and lines
of credit balance was approximately $67,000 although we
originate these types of loans in amounts substantially greater
and lower than this average. At December 31, 2008, our
largest home equity line of credit was $1.5 million and our
largest home equity loan was $368,000 and both were performing
in accordance with their original terms.
We offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit that
are secured by the borrowers primary residence or second
home. Historically, we have not focused on originating these
types of loans; but in 2007 we hired an experienced loan officer
in an effort to increase our origination of these loans. Home
equity lines of credit have a maximum term of 20 years
during which time the borrower is required to make principal
payments based on a
20-year
amortization, and are variable rate loans. The borrower is
permitted to draw against the line during the entire term. Our
home equity lines of credit have a ceiling rate and in 2008, we
instituted a floor rate. Our home equity loans are typically
fully amortizing with fixed terms to 20 years. Home equity
loans and lines of credit are generally underwritten with the
same criteria that we use to underwrite fixed-rate, one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. Home equity loans and
lines of credit may be underwritten with a
loan-to-value
ratio of 80% when combined with the principal balance of the
existing mortgage loan. We appraise the property securing the
loan at the time of the loan application to determine the value
of the property. At the time we close a home equity loan or line
of credit, we record a mortgage to perfect our security interest
in the underlying collateral.
Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations and
Servicing. Lending activities are conducted in
our Staten Island, New Jersey, and Brooklyn branch office
locations. All loans we originate for our portfolio are
underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures. Freddie
Mac underwriting standards are utilized for loans we originate
to sell in the secondary market. We may, based on proper
approvals, make exceptions to our policies and procedures. We
originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. Our ability
to originate fixed- or adjustable-rate loans is dependent on the
relative customer demand for such loans, which is affected by
various factors including current market interest rates as well
as anticipated future market interest rates. Our loan
origination and sales activity may be adversely affected by a
rising interest rate environment that typically results in
decreased loan demand. A significant portion of our commercial
real estate loans and multifamily real estate loans are
generated by referrals from loan brokers, accountants, and other
professional contacts. Most of our one- to four-family
residential real estate loans are generated through referrals
from branch personnel. Our home equity loans and lines of credit
are typically generated through direct mail advertisements,
newspaper advertisements, and referrals from branch personnel.
We generally retain in our portfolio all adjustable-rate loans
we originate, as well as shorter-term, fixed-rate residential
loans (terms of 10 years or less). Loans we sell consist
primarily of conforming, longer-term, fixed-rate residential
loans. However, due to market conditions in the secondary market
throughout 2008, we held in portfolio substantially all fixed
rate residential loans that we originated. We sold
$4.1 million of one- to four-family residential real estate
loans (all fixed-rate loans, with terms of 15 years or
longer) during the year ended December 31, 2008, and had no
loans
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2008.
We sell our loans without recourse, except for standard
representations and warranties provided in secondary market
transactions. Currently, we retain the servicing rights on one-
to four-family residential real estate loans we sell. At
December 31, 2008, we were servicing loans owned by others
with a principal balance of $77.5 million, consisting of
$77.3 million of one- to four-family residential mortgage
loans and $250,000 of construction and land loans. We have
entered into a limited number of loan participations in recent
years. Historically, the origination of loans held for sale and
related servicing activity has not been material to our
operations. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting
loan payments, accounting for principal and interest, contacting
delinquent borrowers, supervising foreclosures and property
dispositions in the event of
9
unremedied defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments
on behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the
loans. We retain a portion of the interest paid by the borrower
on the loans we service as consideration for our servicing
activities or receive a tax credit.
Loan Approval Procedures and
Authority. Northfield Banks lending
activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting
standards established by Northfield Banks board of
directors. The loan approval process is intended to assess the
borrowers ability to repay the loan and value of the
property that will secure the loan, if any. To assess the
borrowers ability to repay, we review the borrowers
employment and credit history, and information on the historical
and projected income and expenses of the borrower.
Northfield Banks lending officers have individual lending
authority that is approved by the Board of Directors.
1st Vice
Presidents may approve aggregate lending relationships for loans
up to $1 million secured by properly margined real estate,
which includes loans for construction, land, or multifamily
purposes, and $250 thousand for loans that are not secured by
properly margined real estate which includes loans that are
unsecured. Loans in excess of those thresholds require the
concurrence of the Chief Lending Officer when the aggregate
relationship is up to $2.5 million or $500 thousand,
respectively and the approval of the Chief Executive Officer for
those instances when the aggregation thresholds exceed those
established for the Chief Lending Officer, up to
$10 million. Extensions of credit of over $10 million
requires the board of directors to approve an exception to the
Chief Lending Officer and Chief Executive Officer lending
authorities. All loans are reported to the board of directors in
the month following the closing.
Northfield Bank also uses automated underwriting systems to
assist in the underwriting of one- to four-family residential
real estate loans, home equity loans, and home equity lines of
credit. Applications for loan amounts in excess of the
conforming loan limit may be approved, subject to an appraisal
of the subject property. We require appraisals by independent,
licensed, third-party appraisers of all real property securing
loans greater than $250,000. Management evaluates and the board
of directors approves all appraisers annually.
Non-Performing
and Problem Assets
When a loan is over 15 days delinquent, we generally send
the borrower a late charge notice. When the loan is 30 days
past due, we generally mail the borrower a letter reminding the
borrower of the delinquency and, except for loans secured by
one- to four-family residential real estate, we attempt
personal, direct contact with the borrower to determine the
reason for the delinquency, to ensure that the borrower
correctly understands the terms of the loan, and to emphasize
the importance of making payments on or before the due date. If
necessary, additional late charges and delinquency notices are
issued and the account will be monitored periodically. After the
90th day
of delinquency, we will send the borrower a final demand for
payment and refer the loan to legal counsel to commence
foreclosure proceedings. Our loan officers can shorten these
time frames in consultation with the Chief Lending Officer.
Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when payment
of principal or interest is 90 days or greater delinquent
unless the loan is considered well-secured and in the process of
collection. Loans also are placed on non-accrual status at any
time if the ultimate collection of principal or interest in full
is in doubt. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid
accrued interest is reversed, and further income is recognized
only to the extent received, if the principal balance is deemed
fully collectible. The loan may be returned to accrual status if
both principal and interest payments are brought current and
factors indicating doubtful collection no longer exist,
including performance by the borrower under the loan terms for a
six-month period. Our Chief Lending Officer reports monitored
loans, including all loans rated watch, special mention,
substandard, doubtful or loss, to the board of directors on a
monthly basis.
For economic reasons and to maximize the recovery of a loan, the
Company works with borrowers experiencing financial
difficulties, and will consider modifications to a
borrowers existing loan terms and conditions that it would
not otherwise consider, commonly referred to as troubled debt
restructurings. The Company records an impairment loss, if any,
based on the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the original loans effective interest rate.
The Company will report the loan as a troubled debt
restructuring through the end of the calendar year that the
restructuring takes place and until such time that the
10
loan yields a market rate of interest (a rate equal to or
greater than the rate the Company was willing to accept at the
time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk).
Government legislation is currently being considered that could,
by law or court ruling, require the Company to make loan
concessions that it would not ordinarily consider, including the
forgiveness of principal, extension of loan terms,
and/or the
reduction of a loans contractual interest rate. The
Company cannot, at this time, estimate the effect such
legislation could have on the Companys financial condition
or results of operations. Also, the Company cannot, at this
time, estimate the effect such legislation could have on its
mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
Non-Performing and Restructured Assets. The
table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our
non-performing assets at the dates indicated. At
December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, we had
troubled debt restructurings of $1.0 million,
$1.3 million, $1.7 million, $885,000, and $0,
respectively, all of which appear within the caption of
non-accrual loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
4,416
|
|
|
$
|
4,792
|
|
|
$
|
5,167
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
3,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
9,502
|
|
|
|
8,606
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or greater and still accruing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days or greater and still accruing
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
9,834
|
|
|
|
7,115
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
10,710
|
|
|
$
|
9,834
|
|
|
$
|
7,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,294,747
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,566,564
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
|
|
424,329
|
|
|
|
409,189
|
|
|
|
387,467
|
|
|
|
320,691
|
|
11
For the year ended December 31, 2008, gross interest income
that would have been recorded had our non-accruing loans been
current in accordance with their original terms was $911,000. No
interest income was recognized on such non-accruing loans on a
cash basis.
Other Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired
by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of
foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. At the date
property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value, establishing a new cost basis. Estimated
fair value generally represents the sale price a buyer would be
willing to pay on the basis of current market conditions,
including normal terms from other financial institutions, less
the estimated costs to sell the property. Holding costs and
declines in estimated fair value result in charges to expense
after acquisition. At December 31, 2008, the Company owned
with a combined carrying value of $1.1 million. The
properties consist of six mixed use properties and six
1-4 family
properties residential units located in Trenton, New Jersey. The
Company is currently renting certain of the properties and has
contracted with a third party to assist the Company in
evaluating its options for disposal of the properties. The
Company did not have any other real estate owned in four years
preceding 2008.
Potential Problem Loans. The current economic
environment is negatively affecting certain borrowers. Our loan
officers continue to monitor their loan portfolios, including
the evaluation of borrowers business operations, current
financial condition, underlying values of any collateral, and
assessment of their financial prospects in the current and
deteriorating economic environment. Based on this evaluation, we
determine an appropriate strategy to assist borrowers, with the
objective of maximizing the recovery of the related loan
balances.
At December 31, 2008, management has begun negotiations
with a borrower who is a developer in our market area to
restructure certain loans within their total relationship. The
borrower has relationships totaling $14.3 million at
December 31, 2008. The borrower has requested to
restructure loans totaling $6.5 million. At
December 31, 2008, all loans within the relationship are
performing in accordance with their original contractual terms
and management believes each loan is well secured. Impairment,
if any, on the restructured loans is not expected to have a
significant affect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
Classification of Assets. Our policies,
consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for the
classification of loans and other assets that are considered to
be of lesser quality as substandard, doubtful, or loss assets.
An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately
protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the
obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets
include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility
that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the
weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the
added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection
or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and
improbable. Assets (or portions of assets) classified as loss
are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that
their continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not
expose us to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of
the aforementioned categories, but which possess potential
weaknesses that deserve our close attention, are designated as
special mention. On the basis of our review of our assets at
December 31, 2008, classified assets (which are not
reported as non-performing assets in the preceding table)
consisted of substandard assets of $3.0 million ,no
doubtful or loss assets, and $2.6 million of assets
designated as special mention.
Our determination as to the classification of our assets (and
the amount of our loss allowances) will be subject to review by
our principal federal regulator, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, which can require that we adjust our classification
and related loss allowances. We regularly review our asset
portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification
in accordance with applicable regulations.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
We provide for loan losses based on the consistent application
of our documented allowance for loan loss methodology. Loan
losses are charged to the allowance for loans losses and
recoveries are credited to it. Additions to the allowance for
loan losses are provided by charges against income based on
various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current
recognition in estimating probable losses. We regularly review
the
12
loan portfolio and make adjustments for loan losses in order to
maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The allowance for loan losses consists
primarily of the following two components:
(1) Allowances are established for impaired loans
(generally defined as non-accrual loans with an outstanding
balance of $500,000 or greater). The amount of impairment
provided for as an allowance is represented by the deficiency,
if any, between the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the original loans effective interest rate
or the underlying collateral (less estimated costs to sell,) if
the loan is collateral dependent, and the carrying value of the
loan. Impaired loans that have no impairment losses are not
considered for general valuation allowances described below.
(2) General allowances are established for loan losses on a
portfolio basis for loans that do not meet the definition of
impaired. The portfolio is grouped into similar risk
characteristics, primarily loan type,
loan-to-value,
if collateral dependent, and delinquency status. We apply an
estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates applied
are based on our loss experience adjusted, as appropriate, for
the environmental factors discussed below. This evaluation is
inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that
may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes
in economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan
losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan
losses we have established, which could have a material negative
effect on our financial results.
The adjustments to our loss experience are based on our
evaluation of several environmental factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in local, regional, national, and international economic
and business conditions and developments that affect the
collectibility of our portfolio, including the condition of
various market segments;
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of our portfolio and in the
terms of our loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending
management and other relevant staff;
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume
of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely
classified or graded loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of underlying collateral for
collateral-dependent loans;
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and
changes in the level of such concentrations; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and
legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated
credit losses in our existing portfolio.
|
We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based on the combined
total of the impaired and general components. Generally when the
loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, our allowance
for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of
estimated probable losses than would be the case without the
increase. Generally when the loan portfolio decreases, absent
other factors, our allowance for loan loss methodology results
in a lower dollar amount of estimated probable losses than would
be the case without the decrease.
On a quarterly basis we evaluate the allowance for loan losses
and adjust the allowance as appropriate through a provision or
recovery for loan losses. While we use the best information
available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the
allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially
from the information used in making the evaluations. In
addition, as an integral part of their examination process, the
Office of Thrift Supervision will periodically review the
allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may
require us to adjust the allowance based on their analysis of
information available to them at the time of their examination.
13
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for
loan losses for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
$
|
4,795
|
|
|
$
|
3,166
|
|
|
$
|
2,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
$
|
4,795
|
|
|
$
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of year
|
|
|
91.07
|
|
|
|
57.31
|
|
|
|
70.70
|
|
|
|
232.88
|
|
|
|
136.58
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans held-for- investment, net at
end of year
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The
following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses
allocated by loan category, the total loan balances by category,
and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the
dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each
category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any
particular category and does not restrict the use of the
allowance to absorb losses in other categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
49.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
17.49
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
26.29
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
12.74
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
Other
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
4,988
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
42.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
38.98
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
32.87
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
40.95
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
13.64
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
8.70
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
3,141
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
Management has established a management asset liability
committee comprised of our Treasurer, who chairs this Committee,
our Chief Executive Officer, our Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, our Executive Vice President and Chief
Lending Officer, and our Executive Vice President of Operations.
This committee is responsible for evaluating the interest rate
risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for recommending to
the asset liability management committee of our board of
directors the level of risk that is appropriate, given our
business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and
performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent
with the guidelines approved by the board of directors. This
committee reports to our asset liability committee of the board
of directors, consisting of four non-employee board members,
which has primary responsibility, among other things, for
establishing and overseeing our investment policy, subject to
oversight by our entire board of directors. The investment
policy is reviewed at least annually by the asset liability
committee, and any changes to the policy are subject to
ratification by the full board of directors. This policy
dictates that investment decisions give consideration to the
safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential
returns, the ability to provide collateral for pledging
requirements, and consistency with our interest rate risk
management strategy. Our Treasurer executes our securities
portfolio transactions, within policy requirements, with the
approval of either the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief
Financial Officer. NSB Services Corp.s and NSB Realty
Trusts Investment Officers execute securities portfolio
transactions in accordance with investment policies that
substantially mirror Northfield Banks investment policy.
All purchase and sale transactions are formally reviewed by the
asset liability committee at least quarterly.
Our current investment policy permits investments in
mortgage-backed securities, including pass-through securities
and real estate mortgage investment conduits
(REMICs). The investment policy also permits, with
certain limitations, investments in debt securities issued by
the United States Government, agencies of the United States
Government or United States Government-sponsored enterprises
(GSEs), asset-backed securities, money market mutual funds,
federal funds, investment grade corporate bonds, reverse
repurchase agreements and certificates of deposit.
Northfield Banks investment policy does not permit
investment in municipal bonds, preferred and common stock of
other entities including U.S. Government sponsored
enterprises or equity securities other than our required
investment in the common stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York, or as permitted for community reinvestment purposes or
for the purposes of funding the Banks deferred
compensation plan. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may invest in equity
securities of other financial institutions up to certain
15
limitations. As of December 31, 2008, we held no
asset-backed securities other than mortgage-backed securities.
Our board of directors may make changes to these limitations in
the future.
Our current investment policy does not permit hedging through
the use of such instruments as financial futures, interest rate
options, and swaps.
SFAS No. 115 Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities requires that, at the time
of purchase, we designate a security as either
held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale,
or trading, based upon our ability and intent to hold such
securities. Trading securities and securities
available-for-sale
are reported at estimated fair value, and securities
held-to-maturity
are reported at amortized cost. A periodic review and evaluation
of the
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios is conducted to determine if the estimated
fair value of any security has declined below its carrying value
and whether such impairment is
other-than-temporary.
If such impairment is deemed to be
other-than-temporary,
the security is written down to a new cost basis and the
resulting loss is charged against earnings. The estimated fair
values of our securities are obtained from an independent
nationally recognized pricing service (see Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies for further discussion). At
December 31, 2008, our investment portfolio consisted
primarily of mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises and to a lesser
extent mutual funds, corporate securities and private label
mortgaged-backed securities. The market for these securities
primarily consists of other financial institutions, insurance
companies, real estate investment trusts, and mutual funds.
Our
available-for-sale
securities portfolio at December 31, 2008, consisted of
securities with the following amortized cost:
$597.9 million of pass-through mortgage-backed securities,
of which $532.9 million were issued or guaranteed by GSEs
and $65.0 million issued by non-GSEs; $333.0 million
of REMICs, of which $242.6 million were issued or
guaranteed by GSEs and $90.4 million issued by non-GSEs;
and $26.3 million of other securities, consisting of
corporate obligations and equity securities which primarily
consisted of a money market mutual fund.
Included in the above
available-for-sale
security amounts, at December 31, 2008, were 16 residential
mortgage-backed senior class securities issued by non-GSEs
with an amortized cost of $155.5 million and an estimated
fair value of $139.5 million. Twelve of these securities
were in an unrealized loss position with an amortized cost of
$110.7 million and estimated fair value of
$93.8 million. Management has evaluated each of these 12
securities and concluded that as of December 31, 2008, the
unrealized losses on these securities were temporary.
Of the 12 non-GSE securities in an unrealized loss position all
but two were rated AAA at December 31, 2008. These two
securities had a total amortized cost of $17.7 million.
Both of these securities were rated investment grade at
December 31, 2008. The first security, with an amortized
cost of $9.5, and estimated fair value of $5.4 million, was
rated Aa2 at December 31, 2008, and was subsequently
downgraded to Baa2 (investment grade) as of February 28,
2009. The second security with an amortized cost of
$8.2 million, and estimated fair value of
$5.8 million, was rated Baa3 at December 31, 2008.
Management has evaluated each of the 12 securities in an
unrealized loss position at December 31, 2008. Seven of the
12 securities experienced unrealized losses of less than ten
percent at December 31, 2008. These seven securities, with
an amortized cost of $58.8 million, and estimated fair
value of $55.9 million, were reviewed for key underlying
loan risk characteristics including origination dates, interest
rates levels and composition of variable and fixed rates, reset
dates (including related pricing indexes), current loan to
original collateral values, locations of collateral, delinquency
status of loans, and current credit support. These seven
securities experienced a majority of their unrealized losses in
the fourth quarter of 2008.
The remaining five residential mortgage backed securities issued
by non-GSEs at December 31, 2008, had an amortized cost of
$51.9 million, and estimated fair value of
$37.9 million, representing unrealized losses of 10% or
more of their amortized cost. In addition to reviewing the
underlying loan risk characteristics described above for
non-GSEs with realized losses of less than 10%, management also
reviewed historical and expected default rates and related
historical and expected losses on the disposal of the underlying
collateral on
16
defaulted loans. Based on this evaluation, management believes
that it is not probable that the Company will not receive all
amounts due under the contractual terms of the securities.
We purchase mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed
primarily by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae and to a
lesser extent securities issued by private companies (private
label). We invest in mortgage-backed securities to achieve
positive interest rate spreads with minimal administrative
expense, and to lower our credit risk as a result of the
guarantees provided by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae.
Mortgage-backed securities are securities sold in the secondary
market that are collateralized by pools of mortgages. Certain
types of mortgage-backed securities are commonly referred to as
pass-through certificates because the principal and
interest of the underlying loans is passed through
pro rata to investors, net of certain costs, including servicing
and guarantee fees, in proportion to an investors
ownership in the entire pool. The issuers of such securities
pool and resell the participation interests in the form of
securities to investors such as us. The interest rate of the
security is lower than the interest rates of the underlying
loans to allow for payment of servicing and guaranty fees.
Ginnie Mae, a United States Government agency, and GSEs, such as
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, may guarantee the payments or
guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest to
investors.
Mortgage-backed securities generally yield less than the loans
that underlie such securities because of the cost of servicing
fees, payment guarantees, and credit enhancements. However,
mortgage-backed securities are more liquid than individual
mortgage loans since there is a trading mechanism for such
securities. In addition, mortgage-backed securities may be used
to collateralize our specific liabilities and obligations.
Investments in mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed
by GSEs involve a risk that actual payments will be greater or
less than the prepayment rate estimated at the time of purchase,
which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium
or accretion of any discount relating to such interests, thereby
affecting the net yield on our securities. We periodically
review current prepayment speeds to determine whether prepayment
estimates require modification that could cause adjustment of
amortization or accretion.
REMICs are a type of mortgage-backed security issued by
special-purpose entities that aggregate pools of mortgages and
mortgage-backed securities and creates different classes of
securities with varying maturities and amortization schedules,
as well as a residual interest, with each class possessing
different risk characteristics. The cash flows from the
underlying collateral are generally divided into
tranches or classes that have descending priorities
with respect to the distribution of principal and interest cash
flows, while cash flows on pass-through mortgage-backed
securities are distributed pro rata to all security holders.
The timely payment of principal and interest on these REMICs are
generally supported (credit enhanced) in varying degrees by
either insurance issued by a financial guarantee insurer,
letters of credit, over collateralization, or subordination
techniques. Substantially all of these securities are triple
A rated by Standard & Poors or Moodys at
the time of purchase. Privately issued REMICs and pass-throughs
can be subject to certain credit-related risks normally not
associated with United States Government agency and United
States Government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed
securities. The loss protection generally provided by the
various forms of credit enhancements is limited, and losses in
excess of certain levels are not protected. Furthermore, the
credit enhancement itself may be subject to the creditworthiness
of the credit enhancer. Thus, in the event a credit enhancer
does not fulfill its obligations, the holder could be subject to
risk of loss similar to a purchaser of a whole loan pool.
Management believes that the credit enhancements are adequate to
protect us from material losses on our privately issued
mortgage-backed securities.
At December 31, 2008, our corporate bond portfolio
consisted of $17.4 million of short-term investment grade
securities. Our investment policy provides that we may invest up
to 15% of our tier-one risk-based capital in corporate bonds
from individual issuers which, at the time of purchase, are
within the three highest investment-grade ratings from
Standard & Poors or Moodys. The maturity of these
bonds may not exceed 10 years, and there is no aggregate
limit for this security type. Corporate bonds from individual
issuers with investment-grade ratings, at the time of purchase,
below the top three ratings are limited to the lesser of 1% of
our total assets or 15% of our tier-one risk-based capital and
must have a maturity of less than one year. Aggregate holdings
of this security type cannot exceed 5% of our total assets.
Bonds that subsequently
17
experience a decline in credit rating below investment grade are
monitored at least monthly to determine whether we should
continue to hold the bond.
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated
fair value of our
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios (excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York common stock) at the dates indicated. As of
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, we had a trading
portfolio with a market value of $2.5 million,
$3.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively,
consisting of mutual funds quoted in actively traded markets.
These securities are utilized to fund non-qualified deferred
compensation obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
532,870
|
|
|
$
|
546,244
|
|
|
$
|
491,758
|
|
|
$
|
486,562
|
|
|
$
|
552,683
|
|
|
$
|
533,051
|
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
|
|
55,778
|
|
|
|
29,200
|
|
|
|
28,867
|
|
|
|
33,853
|
|
|
|
33,215
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
242,557
|
|
|
|
245,492
|
|
|
|
171,709
|
|
|
|
171,207
|
|
|
|
98,601
|
|
|
|
95,439
|
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
90,446
|
|
|
|
83,695
|
|
|
|
36,141
|
|
|
|
36,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
65,146
|
|
|
|
65,247
|
|
|
|
44,390
|
|
|
|
44,345
|
|
Equity investments(1)
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
14,427
|
|
|
|
14,412
|
|
|
|
7,491
|
|
|
|
7,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
957,257
|
|
|
$
|
957,585
|
|
|
$
|
808,381
|
|
|
$
|
802,817
|
|
|
$
|
737,018
|
|
|
$
|
713,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of money market mutual funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
$
|
6,273
|
|
|
$
|
9,206
|
|
|
$
|
9,320
|
|
|
$
|
12,739
|
|
|
$
|
12,694
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
10,480
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
13,430
|
|
|
|
12,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
14,479
|
|
|
$
|
14,588
|
|
|
$
|
19,686
|
|
|
$
|
19,440
|
|
|
$
|
26,169
|
|
|
$
|
25,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The
composition and maturities of the investment securities
portfolio at December 31, 2008, are summarized in the
following table. Maturities are based on the final contractual
payment dates, and do not reflect the effect of scheduled
principal repayments, prepayments, or early redemptions that may
occur. All of our securities at December 31, 2008, were
taxable securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less
|
|
|
More than One Year through Five Years
|
|
|
More than Five Years through Ten Years
|
|
|
More than Ten Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
212,987
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
233,894
|
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
$
|
85,989
|
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
|
$
|
532,870
|
|
|
$
|
546,244
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
%
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
35,663
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
29,377
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
%
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
|
|
55,778
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
7,110
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
|
17,515
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
25,185
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
%
|
|
|
192,748
|
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
|
242,557
|
|
|
|
245,492
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
39,378
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
%
|
|
|
51,067
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
%
|
|
|
90,446
|
|
|
|
83,695
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
%
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
1.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
33,454
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
266,165
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
298,457
|
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
$
|
359,181
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
957,257
|
|
|
$
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,195
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
$
|
6,273
|
|
|
|
5.43
|
%
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
5.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
5.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,473
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,479
|
|
|
$
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of Funds
General. Deposits traditionally have been our
primary source of funds for our investment and lending
activities. We also borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York and other financial institutions to supplement cash
flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for
interest rate risk management purposes, and to manage our cost
of funds. Our additional sources of funds are the proceeds of
loan sales, scheduled loan payments, maturing investments, loan
prepayments, and retained income on other earning assets.
Deposits. We accept deposits primarily from
the areas in which our offices are located. We rely on our
convenient locations, customer service, and competitive products
and pricing to attract and retain deposits. We offer a variety
of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms.
Our deposit accounts consist of transaction accounts (NOW and
non-interest bearing checking accounts), savings accounts (money
market, passbook, and statement savings), and certificates of
deposit, including individual retirement accounts. We accept
brokered deposits on a limited basis. At December 31, 2008,
we had no brokered deposits.
Interest rates offered are generally established weekly,
maturity terms, service fees, and withdrawal penalties are
reviewed on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based
primarily on current operating strategies and market interest
rates, liquidity requirements, and our deposit growth goals.
At December 31, 2008, we had a total of $417.6 million
in certificates of deposit, of which $377.9 million had
remaining maturities of one year or less. Based on our
experience and current pricing strategy, we believe we will
retain a significant portion of these accounts at maturity.
19
The following tables set forth the distribution of our average
total deposit accounts, by account type, for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand
|
|
$
|
94,499
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
96,796
|
|
|
|
9.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
NOW
|
|
|
63,512
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
46,436
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
64,444
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
317,426
|
|
|
|
34.97
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
401,003
|
|
|
|
39.64
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
367,806
|
|
|
|
40.52
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
464,552
|
|
|
|
45.92
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
907,687
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,011,560
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand
|
|
$
|
89,989
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
NOW
|
|
|
37,454
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
398,852
|
|
|
|
39.86
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
474,313
|
|
|
|
47.41
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,000,608
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate amount of our
outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or
equal to $100,000 was $165.2 million. The following table
sets forth the maturity of these certificates at
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
57,209
|
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
|
42,349
|
|
Over six months through one year
|
|
|
54,122
|
|
Over one year to three years
|
|
|
10,088
|
|
Over three years
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
165,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings. Our borrowings consist primarily
of securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements) with third party financial institutions, as well as
advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and the
Federal Reserve Bank. As of December 31, 2008, our
repurchase agreements totaled $170.0 million, or 12.4% of
total liabilities, capitalized lease obligations totaled
$2.3 million, or 0.17% of total liabilities, and our
Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled $159.8 million, or
11.7% of total liabilities. At December 31, 2008, we had
the ability to borrow an additional $200.0 million under
our existing credit facilities with the Federal Home Loan Bank
of New York. Repurchase agreements are secured by
mortgage-backed securities. Advances from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York are secured by our investment in the common
stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York as well by
pledged mortgage-backed securities.
20
The following table sets forth information concerning balances
and interest rates on our borrowings at and for the years
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
332,084
|
|
|
$
|
124,420
|
|
|
$
|
128,534
|
|
Average balance during year
|
|
$
|
277,227
|
|
|
$
|
127,926
|
|
|
$
|
181,296
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end
|
|
$
|
382,107
|
|
|
$
|
156,459
|
|
|
$
|
220,222
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
Average interest rate during year
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, we had 186 full-time
employees and 33 part-time employees. Our employees are not
represented by any collective bargaining group. Management
believes that we have a good working relationship with our
employees.
Subsidiary
Activities
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. owns 100% of Northfield Investment,
Inc., an inactive New Jersey investment company, and 100% of
Northfield Bank. Northfield Bank owns 100% of NSB Services
Corp., a Delaware corporation, which in turn owns 100% of the
voting common stock of NSB Realty Trust. NSB Realty Trust is a
Maryland real estate investment trust that holds mortgage loans,
mortgage-backed securities and other investments. These entities
enable us to segregate certain assets for management purposes,
and promote our ability to raise regulatory capital in the
future through the sale of preferred stock or other
capital-enhancing securities or borrow against assets or stock
of these entities for liquidity purposes. At December 31,
2008, Northfield Banks investment in NSB Services Corp.
was $583.0 million, and NSB Services Corp. had assets of
$584.8 million and liabilities of $1.8 million at that
date. At December 31, 2008, NSB Services Corp.s
investment in NSB Realty Trust was $572.8 million, and NSB
Realty Trust had $575.9 million in assets and liabilities
of $3.1 million at that date. NSB Insurance Agency, Inc. is
a New York corporation that receives nominal commissions from
the sale of life insurance by employees of Northfield Bank. At
December 31, 2008, Northfield Banks investment in NSB
Insurance Agency was $1,000. Northfield Bank also owns all or a
portion of three additional, inactive corporations.
SUPERVISION
AND REGULATION
General
Northfield Bank is examined and supervised by the Office of
Thrift Supervision and is subject to examination by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and supervision
establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an
institution may engage and is intended primarily for the
protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations
deposit insurance funds and the institutions depositors.
Under this system of federal regulation, financial institutions
are periodically examined to ensure that they satisfy applicable
standards with respect to their capital adequacy, assets,
management, earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to market
risks. Following completion of its examination, the federal
agency critiques the institutions operations and assigns
its rating (known as an institutions CAMELS rating). Under
federal law, an institution may not disclose its CAMELS rating
to the public. Northfield Bank also is regulated to a lesser
extent by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
governing reserves to be maintained against deposits and other
matters. The Office of Thrift Supervision examines Northfield
Bank and prepares reports of its findings for the consideration
of its board of directors. Northfield Banks relationship
with its depositors and borrowers also is regulated to a great
extent by federal law and, to a much lesser extent, state law,
especially in matters concerning the ownership of deposit
accounts and the form and content of Northfield Banks loan
documents.
21
Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision,
or Congress, could have a material adverse effect on Northfield
Bancorp, Inc., and Northfield Bank and their operations.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC, as savings
and loan holding companies, are required to file certain reports
with, are subject to examination by, and otherwise must comply
with the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift
Supervision. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. also is subject to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the federal securities laws.
Certain of the regulatory requirements that are or will be
applicable to Northfield Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc., and
Northfield Bancorp, MHC are described below. This description of
statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete
explanation of such statutes and regulations and their influence
on Northfield Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield
Bancorp, MHC and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the actual statutes and regulations.
Federal
Banking Regulation
Business Activities. A federal savings bank
derives its lending and investment powers from the Home
Owners Loan Act, as amended, and the regulations of the
Office of Thrift Supervision. Under these laws and regulations,
Northfield Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by one- to
four-residential real estate without limitations as to a
percentage of assets, and may invest in non-residential real
estate loans up to 400% of capital in the aggregate, commercial
business loans up to 20% of assets in the aggregate and consumer
loans up to 35% of assets in the aggregate, and in certain types
of debt securities and certain other assets. Northfield Bank
also may establish subsidiaries that may engage in activities
not otherwise permissible for Northfield Bank, including real
estate investment, and securities and insurance brokerage.
Capital Requirements. Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations require savings banks to meet three
minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital ratio, a 4%
(core) capital ratio, and an 8% total risk-based capital ratio.
The risk-based capital standard for savings banks requires the
maintenance total capital (which is defined as core capital and
supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8%.
In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets,
including certain off-balance sheet obligations, are multiplied
by a risk-weight factor assigned by the Office of Thrift
Supervision, based on the risks believed inherent in the type of
asset. Core capital is defined as common stockholders
equity (including retained earnings), certain noncumulative
perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority
interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less
intangibles other than certain mortgage servicing rights and
credit card relationships. The components of supplementary
capital currently include cumulative preferred stock, long-term
perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities,
subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the
allowance for loan and lease losses (limited to a maximum of
1.25% of risk-weighted assets) and up to 45% of net unrealized
gains on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values.
Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of
total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital. Additionally,
a savings bank that retains credit risk in connection with an
asset sale may be required to maintain additional regulatory
capital because of the possible recourse to the savings bank.
At December 31, 2008, Northfield Banks capital
exceeded all applicable requirements.
Loans-to-One
Borrower. Generally, a federal savings bank may
not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of
borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. An
additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired
capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily
marketable collateral, which generally does not include real
estate. As of December 31, 2008, Northfield Banks
largest lending relationship with a single or related group of
borrowers totaled $17.9 million, which represented 6.6% of
unimpaired capital and surplus; therefore, Northfield Bank was
in compliance with the
loans-to-one
borrower limitations at December 31, 2008.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. As a federal
savings bank, Northfield Bank must satisfy the qualified thrift
lender, or QTL, test. Under the QTL test, Northfield
Bank must maintain at least 65% of its portfolio
22
assets in qualified thrift investments
(primarily residential mortgages and related investments,
including mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months of
the most recent
12-month
period. Portfolio assets generally means total
assets of a savings institution, less the sum of specified
liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, goodwill and other
intangible assets, and the value of property used in the conduct
of the savings banks business.
A savings bank that fails the qualified thrift lender test must
either convert to a bank charter or operate under specified
restrictions. At December 31, 2008, Northfield Bank
maintained approximately 78.3% of its portfolio assets in
qualified thrift investments and, therefore, satisfied the QTL
test.
Capital Distributions. Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations govern capital distributions by a
federal savings bank, including cash dividends, stock
repurchases, and other transactions charged to the capital
account. A savings bank must file an application for approval of
a capital distribution if:
|
|
|
|
|
the total capital distributions for the applicable calendar year
exceed the sum of the savings banks net income for that
year to date plus the savings banks retained net income
for the preceding two years;
|
|
|
|
the savings bank would not be at least adequately capitalized
following the distribution;
|
|
|
|
the distribution would violate any applicable statute,
regulation, agreement, or Office of Thrift Supervision-imposed
condition; or
|
|
|
|
the savings bank is not eligible for expedited treatment of its
application or notice filings.
|
Even if an application is not otherwise required, every savings
bank that is a subsidiary of a holding company must still file a
notice with the Office of Thrift Supervision at least
30 days before the board of directors declares a dividend
or approves a capital distribution.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may disapprove a notice or
application if:
|
|
|
|
|
the savings bank would be undercapitalized following the
distribution;
|
|
|
|
the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness
concerns; or
|
|
|
|
the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained
in any statute, regulation, or agreement.
|
In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an
insured depository institution shall not make any capital
distribution if, after making such distribution, the institution
would be undercapitalized.
Liquidity. A federal savings bank is required
to maintain a sufficient amount of liquidity to ensure its safe
and sound operation. We seek to maintain a ratio of liquid
assets not subject to pledge as a percentage of deposits and
borrowings not subject to pledge of 35% or greater. At
December 31, 2008, this ratio was 74.51%.
Assessments. The Office of Thrift Supervision
charges assessments to recover the costs of examining savings
banks and their affiliates. These assessments are based on three
components: the size of the savings bank on which the basic
assessment is based; the savings banks supervisory condition,
which results in an additional assessment based on a percentage
of the basic assessment for any savings bank with a composite
rating of 3, 4, or 5 in its most recent safety and soundness
examination; and the complexity of the banks operations. For
2008, the Companys combined assessment was $304,000.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending
Laws. All Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insured institutions have a responsibility under the Community
Reinvestment Act and related regulations of the Office of Thrift
Supervision to help meet the credit needs of their communities,
including low- and moderate-income areas. Further, in connection
with its examination of a federal savings bank, the Office of
Thrift Supervision is required to assess the savings banks
record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. In
addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing
Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending
practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those
statutes. A savings banks failure to comply with the
provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could, at a
minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications such
as branches or mergers, or in restrictions on its activities.
The
23
failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the
Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the
Office of Thrift Supervision, as well as other federal
regulatory agencies including the Department of Justice.
Northfield Bank received a satisfactory Community Reinvestment
Act rating in its most recent examination conducted by the
Office of Thrift Supervision.
Transactions with Related Parties. A federal
savings banks authority to engage in transactions with its
affiliates is limited by Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations and by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act and its implementing Regulation W. An affiliate
is a company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with an insured depository institution such as
Northfield Bank. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is an affiliate of
Northfield Bank. In general, loan transactions between an
insured depository institution and its affiliates are subject to
certain quantitative and collateral requirements. In this
regard, transactions between an insured depository institution
and its affiliates are limited to 10% of the institutions
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus for transactions with
any one affiliate and 20% of unimpaired capital and unimpaired
surplus for transactions in the aggregate with all affiliates.
Collateral in specified amounts ranging from 100% to 130% of the
amount of the transaction must usually be provided by affiliates
in order to receive loans from the savings bank. In addition,
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit a savings bank
from lending to any of its affiliates that are engaged in
activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies,
and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other than
a subsidiary. Finally, transactions with affiliates must be
consistent with safe and sound banking practices, not involve
low-quality assets, and be on terms that are as favorable to the
institution as comparable transactions with non-affiliates. The
Office of Thrift Supervision requires savings banks to maintain
detailed records of all transactions with affiliates.
Northfield Banks authority to extend credit to its
directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders, as
well as to entities controlled by such persons, is governed by
the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal
Reserve Act (FRA) and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve
Board. Among other things, these provisions require that
extensions of credit to insiders:
(i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as,
and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less
stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions
with unaffiliated persons, and that do not involve more than the
normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable
features; and
(ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit
extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate,
which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Northfield
Banks capital.
In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits to
any director, executive officer, or principal stockholder must
be approved by Northfield Banks board of directors.
Section 402 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
prohibits the extension of personal loans to directors and
executive officers of issuers (as defined by in Sarbanes-Oxley).
The prohibition, however, does not apply to any loans made or
maintained by an insured depository institution, such as
Northfield Bank, that is subject to the insider lending
restrictions of the FRA and other applicable rules and
regulations.
Enforcement. The Office of Thrift Supervision
has primary enforcement responsibility over federal savings
institutions and has the authority to bring enforcement action
against all institution-affiliated parties,
including stockholders, attorneys, appraisers, and accountants
who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful actions
likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution.
Formal enforcement action by the Office of Thrift Supervision
may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and
desist order, to removal of officers or directors of the
institution and the appointment of a receiver or conservator.
Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and actions,
and range up to $25,000 per day, unless a finding of reckless
disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as
$1 million per day. The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation also has the authority to terminate deposit
insurance or to recommend to the Director of the Office of
Thrift Supervision that enforcement action be taken with respect
to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by
the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has
authority to take actions under specified circumstances.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal
law requires each federal banking agency to prescribe certain
standards for all insured depository institutions. These
standards relate to, among other things, internal
24
controls, information systems and audit systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure,
asset growth, compensation, and other operational and managerial
standards as the agency deems appropriate. The federal banking
agencies adopted Interagency Guidelines Prescribing Standards
for Safety and Soundness to implement the safety and soundness
standards required under federal law. The guidelines set forth
the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking
agencies use to identify and address problems at insured
depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the
appropriate federal banking agency determines that an
institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the
guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to
the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the
standard. If an institution fails to meet these standards, the
appropriate federal banking agency may require the institution
to submit a compliance plan.
Prompt Corrective Action Regulations. Under
the prompt corrective action regulations, the Office of Thrift
Supervision is required and authorized to take supervisory
actions against undercapitalized savings banks. For this
purpose, a savings bank is placed in one of the following five
categories based on the savings banks capital:
|
|
|
|
|
well-capitalized (at least 5% (core) capital, 6% Tier 1
risk-based capital and 10% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
adequately capitalized (at least 4% leverage capital, 4%
Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1
risk-based capital or 8% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
significantly undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital,
3% Tier 1 risk-based capital or 6% total risk-based
capital); and
|
|
|
|
critically undercapitalized (less than 2% tangible capital).
|
Generally, the banking regulator is required to appoint a
receiver or conservator for a savings bank that is
critically undercapitalized within specific time
frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration
plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision within
45 days of the date a savings bank receives notice that it
is undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized. The criteria for an acceptable capital
restoration plan include, among other things, the establishment
of the methodology and assumptions for attaining adequately
capitalized status on an annual basis, procedures for ensuring
compliance with restrictions imposed by applicable federal
regulations, the identification of the types and levels of
activities the savings bank will engage in while the capital
restoration plan is in effect, and assurances that the capital
restoration plan will not appreciably increase the current risk
profile of the savings bank. Any holding company for the savings
bank required to submit a capital restoration plan must
guarantee the lesser of an amount equal to 5% of the savings
banks assets at the time it was notified or deemed to be
undercapitalized by the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the
amount necessary to restore the savings bank to adequately
capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place until the
Office of Thrift Supervision notifies the savings bank that it
has maintained adequately capitalized status for each of four
consecutive calendar quarters, and the Office of Thrift
Supervision has the authority to require payment and collect
payment under the guarantee. Failure by a holding company to
provide the required guarantee will result in certain operating
restrictions on the savings bank, such as restrictions on the
ability to declare and pay dividends, pay executive compensation
and management fees, and increase assets or expand operations.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may also take any one of a
number of discretionary supervisory actions against
undercapitalized associations, including the issuance of a
capital directive and the replacement of senior executive
officers and directors.
At December 31, 2008, Northfield Bank met the criteria for
being considered well-capitalized.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The FDIC
insures deposit accounts in Northfield Bank generally up to a
maximum of $100,000 per separately-insured depositor, and up to
a maximum of $250,000 per separately-insured depositor for
certain retirement accounts As an FDIC-insured depository
institutions, Northfield Bank
25
is required to pay deposit insurance premiums based on the risk
each institution poses to the Deposit Insurance Fund. As of
December 31, 2008, the annual FDIC assessment rate ranged
from $0.05 to $0.43 per $100 of insured deposits, based on the
institutions relative risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund,
as measured by the institutions regulatory capital
position and other supervisory factors. The FDIC also has the
authority to raise or lower assessment rates on insured
deposits, subject to limits, and to impose special additional
assessments.
As a result of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
(EESA) signed into law on October 3, 2008, the
$100,000 limit on insured deposits has been increased to
$250,000, matching the limit on qualified retirement accounts,
through December 31, 2009. In addition, Northfield Bank has
elected to participate in the Transaction Account Guarantee
Program under the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guaranty
Program (TLGP). Under the Transaction Account
Guarantee Program, non-interest bearing transaction deposit
accounts and interest bearing transaction accounts
paying 50 basis points or less will be fully insured above
and beyond the $250,000 limit through the same date. While this
unlimited insurance coverage is in effect, covered deposits in
excess of the $250,000 limit are subject to a surcharge of $0.10
per $100 of deposits insured by the FDIC.
In addition, the FDIC collects funds from insured institutions
sufficient to pay interest on debt obligations of the Financing
Corporation (FICO). FICO is a government-sponsored entity that
was formed to borrow the money necessary to carry out the
closing and ultimate disposition of failed thrift institutions
by the Resolution Trust Corporation. For the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, the annualized FICO assessment was equal
to $0.012 for each $100 of insured domestic deposits maintained
at an institution.
In 2008, we were assessed total FDIC premiums of $590,000,
consisting of $482,000 in deposit insurance premiums and
$108,000 in FICO assessments. Northfield Bank was permitted to
reduce its 2008 deposit insurance premium payments by $460,000
in FDIC credits, previously earned by Northfield
Bank for its participation in the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Northfield Bank has no remaining deposit insurance credits at
December 31, 2008.
Due to losses incurred by the DIF in 2008, and in anticipation
of future losses, the FDIC adopted an
across-the-board
seven basis point increase in the assessment range, effective
January 2009. In addition to this increase, Banks will be
assessed up to an additional nine basis points, beginning in the
second quarter of 2009 assessment period, as a result of
subsequent refinements made by the FDIC to the risk-based
assessment system. Furthermore, on February 27, 2009, the
FDIC adopted an interim rule imposing a 20-basis point emergency
special assessment on the industry as of June 30, 2009,
which is to be collected on September 30, 2009. The interim
rule also permits the FDIC to impose an emergency special
assessment of up to ten basis points after June 30, 2009,
if necessary, to maintain public confidence in federal deposit
insurance. Comments on the interim rule on special assessments
are due no later than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has purchased equity
positions in a wide variety of financial services companies
under a program, known as the Troubled Asset Relief
Program-Capital Purchase Program (the TARP Capital
Purchase Program).
The Treasury has made capital available to U.S. financial
services companies in the form of preferred stock. In
conjunction with the purchase of preferred stock, which will
yield 5% for the first five years that it is outstanding, and 9%
thereafter, until it is redeemed, the Treasury will receive
warrants to purchase common stock with an aggregate market value
equal to 15% of the preferred investment. The TARP Capital
Purchase Program also has other terms and conditions, including
limitations of cash dividends, restrictions on treasury stock
repurchases and executive compensation limitations.
Northfield Bank has a strong capital position, with total
capital to risk-weighted assets in excess of 34% and has
decided, after careful consideration, not to apply to
participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program.
Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has implemented a
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program has two primary components: the Debt Guarantee
Program, by which the
26
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will guarantee the payment
of certain newly-issued senior unsecured debt, and the
Transaction Account Guarantee Program, by which the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation will guarantee certain
noninterest-bearing transaction accounts. The Company and the
Bank, by regulation, were automatically participating in the
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program through December 5,
2008.
The Company has carefully evaluated each of these two programs
and decided to opt-out of continued participation in
the Debt Guarantee Program. The Bank did not opt-out
of the Transaction Account Guarantee Program and therefore will
continue to participate in that program providing unlimited
Federal Deposit Insurance, through December 31, 2009, to
certain noninterest-bearing transaction accounts held at
Northfield Bank. The cost of participate in the Transaction
Account Guarantee Program is not expected to have a significant
impact on the operations of the Company.
On January 16, 2009, in an effort to further strengthen the
financial system and U.S. economy, the FDIC announced that
it will soon propose rule changes to the Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program to extend the maturity of the guarantee from
three to up to 10 years where the debt is supported by
collateral and the issuance supports new consumer lending. Until
the details of this extended program are finalized and
published, we cannot determine to what extent, if any, we would
participate in this program.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System
Northfield Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks.
The Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit
facility primarily for member institutions. As a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, Northfield Bank is required
to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home
Loan Bank of New York in an amount determined by a
membership investment component and an
activity-based investment component. The membership
investment component is the greater of 0.20% of an
institutions Mortgage-related Assets, as
defined by the Federal Home Loan Bank, or $1,000. The
activity-based investment component is equal to 4.5% of the
institutions outstanding advances with the Federal Home
Loan Bank. The activity-based investment component also
considers other transactions, including assets originated for or
sold to the Federal Home Loan Bank and delivery commitments
issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank. Northfield Bank currently
does not enter into these other types of transactions with the
Federal Home Loan Bank. As of December 31, 2008, Northfield
Bank was in compliance with its ownership requirement. At
December 31, 2008, Northfield Bank held $9.4 million
of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York common stock.
Other
Regulations
Some interest and other charges collected or contracted for by
Northfield Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws
concerning interest rates and charges. Northfield Banks
operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit
transactions, such as the:
|
|
|
|
|
Truth-In-Lending
Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
|
|
|
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions
to provide information to enable the public and public officials
to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its
obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it
serves;
|
|
|
|
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the
basis of race, creed, or other prohibited factors in extending
credit;
|
|
|
|
Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of
information to credit reporting agencies;
|
|
|
|
Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer
debts may be collected by collection agencies; and
|
|
|
|
rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged
with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.
|
27
The operations of Northfield Bank also are subject to the:
|
|
|
|
|
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain
confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes
procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of
financial records;
|
|
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated
thereunder, that govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals
from deposit accounts and customers rights and liabilities
arising from the use of automated teller machines and other
electronic banking services;
|
|
|
|
Title III of The Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001 (referred to as the USA PATRIOT
Act), which significantly expanded the responsibilities of
financial institutions, in preventing the use of the United
States financial system to fund terrorist activities. Among
other things, the USA PATRIOT Act and the related regulations of
the Office of Thrift Supervision require savings banks operating
in the United States to develop anti-money laundering compliance
programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the
detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required
compliance programs are intended to supplement existing
compliance requirements, also applicable to financial
institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of
Foreign Assets Control Regulations; and
|
|
|
|
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the
sharing of consumer financial information by financial
institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions
offering financial products or services to retail customers to
provide such customers with the financial institutions
privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to
opt out of the sharing of certain personal financial
information with unaffiliated third parties, if the financial
institution customarily shares such information.
|
Holding
Company Regulation
General. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. are non-diversified savings and loan
holding companies within the meaning of the Home Owners
Loan Act. As such, Northfield Bancorp, MHC, and Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. are registered with the Office of Thrift
Supervision and subject to Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations, examinations, supervision, and reporting
requirements. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has
enforcement authority over Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and their subsidiaries. Among other
things, this authority permits the Office of Thrift Supervision
to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a
serious risk to the subsidiary savings institution. As federal
corporations, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. are generally not subject to state business organization
laws.
Permitted Activities. Pursuant to
Section 10(o) of the Home Owners Loan Act and Office
of Thrift Supervision regulations and policy, a mutual holding
company and a federally chartered mid-tier holding company, such
as Northfield Bancorp, Inc., may engage in the following
activities:
(i) investing in the stock of a savings bank;
(ii) acquiring a mutual association through the merger of
such association into a savings bank subsidiary of such holding
company or an interim savings bank subsidiary of such holding
company;
(iii) merging with or acquiring another holding company,
one of whose subsidiaries is a savings bank;
(iv) investing in a corporation, the capital stock of which
is available for purchase by a savings bank under federal law or
under the law of any state where the subsidiary savings bank or
association share their home offices;
(v) furnishing or performing management services for a
savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(vi) holding, managing, or liquidating assets owned or
acquired from a savings bank subsidiary of such company;
28
(vii) holding or managing properties used or occupied by a
savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(viii) acting as trustee under deeds of trust;
(ix) any other activity:
(a) that the Federal Reserve Board, by regulation, has
determined to be permissible for bank holding companies under
Section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
unless the Director, by regulation, prohibits or limits any such
activity for savings and loan holding companies; or
(b) in which multiple savings and loan holding companies
were authorized (by regulation) to directly engage on
March 5, 1987;
(x) any activity permissible for financial holding
companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company
Act, including securities and insurance underwriting; and
(xi) purchasing, holding, or disposing of stock acquired in
connection with a qualified stock issuance if the purchase of
such stock by such savings and loan holding company is approved
by the Director.
(xii) If a mutual holding company acquires or merges with
another holding company, the holding company acquired or the
holding company resulting from such merger or acquisition may
only invest in assets and engage in activities listed in
(i) through (x) above, and has a period of two years
to cease any nonconforming activities and divest any
nonconforming investments.
The Home Owners Loan Act prohibits a savings and loan
holding company, including Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, directly or indirectly, or through one
or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of another
savings institution or holding company thereof, without prior
written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. It also
prohibits the acquisition or retention of, with certain
exceptions, more than 5% of a nonsubsidiary company engaged in
activities other than those permitted by the Home Owners
Loan Act or acquiring or retaining control of an institution
that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by
holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Office of
Thrift Supervision must consider the financial and managerial
resources, future prospects of the company and institution
involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the
federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the
community and competitive factors.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is prohibited from approving
any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan
holding company controlling savings institutions in more than
one state, subject to two exceptions:
(i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by
savings and loan holding companies; and
(ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in another
state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution
specifically permit such acquisition.
The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate
savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
Waivers of Dividends by Northfield Bancorp,
MHC. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations
require Northfield Bancorp, MHC to notify the Office of Thrift
Supervision of any proposed waiver of its receipt of dividends
from Northfield Bancorp, Inc. The Office of Thrift Supervision
reviews dividend waiver notices on a
case-by-case
basis, and, in general, does not object to any such waiver if:
(i) the waiver would not be detrimental to the safe and
sound operation of the subsidiary savings bank; and
(ii) the mutual holding companys board of directors
determines that such waiver is consistent with such
directors fiduciary duties to the mutual holding
companys members. Northfield Bancorp, MHC waived
approximately $985,000 in dividends declared in 2008.
29
Conversion of Northfield Bancorp, MHC to Stock
Form. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations
permit Northfield Bancorp, MHC to convert from the mutual form
of organization to the capital stock form of organization. There
can be no assurance when, if ever, a conversion transaction will
occur, and the board of directors has no current intention or
plan to undertake a conversion transaction. In a conversion
transaction, a new stock holding company would be formed as the
successor to Northfield Bancorp, Inc., Northfield Bancorp,
MHCs corporate existence would end, and certain depositors
of Northfield Bank would receive the right to subscribe for
additional shares of the new holding company. In a conversion
transaction, each share of common stock held by stockholders
other than Northfield Bancorp, MHC would be automatically
converted into a number of shares of common stock of the new
holding company determined pursuant an exchange ratio that
ensures that stockholders other than Northfield Bancorp, MHC own
the same percentage of common stock in the new holding company
as they owned in Northfield Bancorp, Inc. immediately prior to
the conversion transaction, subject to adjustment for any assets
held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC. Any such transaction would
require the approval of our stockholders, including, under
current Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, stockholders
other than Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as well as depositors of
Northfield Bank.
Liquidation Rights. Each depositor of
Northfield Bank has both a deposit account in Northfield Bank
and a pro rata ownership interest in the net worth of Northfield
Bancorp, MHC based on the deposit balance in his or her account.
This ownership interest is tied to the depositors account
and has no tangible market value separate from the deposit
account. This interest may only be realized in the unlikely
event of a complete liquidation of Northfield Bank. Any
depositor who opens a deposit account obtains a pro rata
ownership interest in Northfield Bancorp, MHC without any
additional payment beyond the amount of the deposit. A depositor
who reduces or closes his or her account receives a portion or
all, respectively, of the balance in the deposit account but
nothing for his or her ownership interest in the net worth of
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, which is lost to the extent that the
balance in the account is reduced or closed.
In the unlikely event of a complete liquidation of Northfield
Bank, all claims of creditors of Northfield Bank, including
those of depositors of Northfield Bank (to the extent of their
deposit balances), would be paid first. Thereafter, if there
were any assets of Northfield Bank remaining, these assets would
be distributed to Northfield Bancorp, Inc. as Northfield
Banks sole stockholder. Then, if there were any assets of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. remaining, depositors of Northfield
Bank would receive those remaining assets, pro rata, based upon
the deposit balances in their deposit account in Northfield Bank
immediately prior to liquidation.
Federal
Securities Laws
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s common stock is registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is
subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading
restrictions, and other requirements under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues,
corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive
compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate
information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer will be required
to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act have several requirements, including having these officers
certify that: (i) they are responsible for establishing,
maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting; (ii) they have
made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee
of the board of directors about our internal control over
financial reporting; and (iii) they have included
information in our quarterly and annual reports about their
evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal
control over financial reporting or in other factors that could
materially affect internal control over financial reporting. For
the year ended December 31, 2008, we became subject to
further reporting and audit requirements under the requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
30
TAXATION
Federal
Taxation
General. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
Northfield Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the
same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions
discussed below. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank
are part of a consolidated tax group and file consolidated tax
returns including Northfield Banks wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Northfield Bancorp, MHC does not own at least 80%
of the common stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and therefore
files a separate federal tax return.
Northfield Bancorp, Incs consolidated federal tax returns
are not currently under audit, and have not been audited during
the past five years. The following discussion of federal
taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal
income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the
tax rules applicable to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield
Bancorp, Inc., or Northfield Bank.
Method of Accounting. For federal income tax
purposes, Northfield Bancorp, MHC reports its income and
expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year
ending December 31 for filing its federal and state income tax
returns.
Bad Debt Reserves. Historically, Northfield
Bank was subject to special provisions in the tax law applicable
to qualifying savings banks regarding allowable tax bad debt
deductions and related reserves. Tax law changes were enacted in
1996 that eliminated the ability of savings banks to use the
percentage of taxable income method for computing tax bad debt
reserves for tax years after 1995, and required recapture into
taxable income over a six-year period of all bad debt reserves
accumulated after a savings banks last tax year beginning
before January 1, 1988. Northfield Bank recaptured its post
December 31, 1987 bad-debt reserve balance over the
six-year period ended December 31, 2004.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is required to use the specific charge
off method to account for tax bad debt deductions in the future.
Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to
1996, bad debt reserves created prior to 1988 were subject to
recapture into taxable income if Northfield Bank failed to meet
certain thrift asset and definitional tests or made certain
distributions. Tax law changes in 1996 eliminated thrift-related
recapture rules. However, under current law, pre-1988 tax bad
debt reserves remain subject to recapture if Northfield Bank
makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any of its
common stock, pays dividends in excess of earnings and profits,
or fails to qualify as a bank for tax purposes.
At December 31, 2008, the total federal pre-base year bad
debt reserve of Northfield Bank was approximately
$5.9 million.
Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum tax at
a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain
tax preferences, less any available exemption. The alternative
minimum tax is imposed to the extent it exceeds the regular
income tax. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of
alternative taxable income. Certain payments of alternative
minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax
liabilities in future years. Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s
consolidated group has not been subject to the alternative
minimum tax and has no such amounts available as credits for
carryover.
Net Operating Loss Carryovers. A financial
institution may carry back net operating losses to the preceding
two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable
years. At December 31, 2008, Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
consolidated group had no net operating loss carryforwards for
federal income tax purposes.
Corporate Dividends-Received
Deduction. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may exclude
from its federal taxable income 100% of dividends received from
Northfield Bank as a wholly-owned subsidiary by filing
consolidated tax returns. The corporate dividends-received
deduction is 80% when the corporation receiving the dividend
owns at least 20% of the stock of the distributing corporation.
The dividends-received deduction is 70% when the corporation
receiving the dividend owns less than 20% of the distributing
corporation.
31
State/City
Taxation
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a
calendar year basis to New York State. New York State franchise
tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater
of (a) 7.1% (for 2007 and forward) of entire net
income allocable to New York State, (b) 3% of
alternative entire net income allocable to New York
State, or (c) 0.01% of the average value of assets
allocable to New York State plus nominal minimum tax of $250 per
company. Entire net income is based on federal taxable income,
subject to certain modifications. Alternative entire net income
is equal to entire net income without certain modifications.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a
calendar year basis to New York City. New York City franchise
tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater
of (a) 9.0% of entire net income allocable to
New York State, (b) 3% of alternative entire net
income allocable to New York City, or (c) 0.01%
of the average value of assets allocable to New York City plus
nominal minimum tax of $250 per company. Entire net income is
based on federal taxable income, subject to certain
modifications. Alternative entire net income is equal to entire
net income without certain modifications.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank file New Jersey
Corporation Business Tax returns on a calendar year basis.
Generally, the income derived from New Jersey sources is subject
to New Jersey tax. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank
pay the greater of the corporate business tax (CBT)
at 9% of taxable income or the minimum tax of $1,200 per entity.
At December 31, 2005, Northfield Bank did not meet the
definition of a domestic building and loan association for New
York State and City tax purposes. As a result, we were required
to recognize a $2.2 million deferred tax liability for
state and city thrift-related base-year bad debt reserves
accumulated after December 31, 1987.
Our state tax returns are not currently under audit or have not
been subject to an audit during the past five years, except as
follows. Our New York state tax returns for the years ended
December 31, 2000, through December 31, 2006, were
subject to an audit by the State of New York with respect to our
operation of NSB Services Corp. as a Delaware corporation not
subject to New York State taxation. In 2007, the Company
concluded the audit by the State of New York with respect to the
Companys combined state tax returns for years 2000 through
2006.
The risks set forth below, in addition to the other risks
described in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
operating results. In addition to the risks set forth below and
the other risks described in this annual report, there may also
be additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently
known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial that
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition or operating results. As a result, past financial
performance may not be a reliable indicator of future
performance, and historical trends should not be used to
anticipate results or trends in future periods. Further, to the
extent that any of the information contained in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors set
forth below also are cautionary statements identifying important
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by
or on behalf of us.
Current
Market and Economic Conditions and Related Government Responses
May Significantly Affect Our Operations, Financial Condition,
and Earnings
Recent negative developments in the national and global credit
markets have resulted in uncertainty in the financial markets
with the expectation of a continued downturn in general economic
conditions, including increased levels of unemployment,
continuing into 2009 and beyond. The resulting economic pressure
on consumers and businesses may adversely affect our business,
financial condition, and results of operations. A worsening of
these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of
these difficult market conditions on us and others in the
financial services industry.
32
In general, loan and investment securities credit quality has
deteriorated at many institutions and the values of real estate
collateral supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages
have declined and may continue to decline. Financial
companies stock prices have been negatively affected, as
has the ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise
capital or borrow in the debt markets. As a result, the
potential exists for new federal or state laws and regulations
regarding revisions to the overall regulatory framework, as well
as lending and funding practices and liquidity standards. Bank
regulatory agencies are expected to be active in responding to
concerns and trends identified in examinations. Negative
developments in the financial industry and the domestic and
international credit markets, and the impact of new legislation
in response to those developments, may negatively impact our
operations by restricting our business operations, including our
ability to originate or sell loans, modify loan terms, or
foreclose on property securing a loan. These events may have a
significant adverse impact our financial performance. In
addition, these risks could affect the performance and value of
our loan portfolio as well as the performance and value of our
investment securities portfolio, which would also negatively
affect our financial performance.
Deflationary pressures while possibly lowering our operating
costs, could have a significant negative affect on our
borrowers, especially our business borrowers, and the values of
underlying collateral securing loans, which could negatively
effect our financial performance.
Lack of
Consumer Confidence in Financial Institutions May Decrease Our
Level of Deposits
Our level of deposits may be affected by lack of consumer
confidence in financial institutions, which have caused fewer
depositors to be willing to maintain deposits that are not
FDIC-insured accounts. That may cause depositors to withdraw
deposits and place them in other institutions or to invest
uninsured funds in investments perceived as being more secure,
such as securities issued by the United States Treasury. These
consumer preferences may cause us to be forced to pay higher
interest rates to retain deposits and may constrain liquidity as
we seek to meet funding needs caused by reduced deposit levels.
Legislative
or Regulatory Responses to Perceived Financial and Market
Problems Could Impair Our Rights Against Borrowers.
Current and future proposals made by members of Congress and
others that would reduce the amount distressed borrowers are
otherwise contractually obligated to pay under their mortgage
loans and may limit an institutions ability to foreclose
on mortgage collateral. If proposals such as these, or other
proposals limiting the Banks rights as a creditor, were to
be implemented, we could experience increased credit losses on
our loans or mortgage-backed securities portfolio, or increased
expense in pursuing our remedies as a creditor.
Our
Expenses Will Increase as a Result of Increases in FDIC
Insurance Premiums
The FDIC imposes an assessment against institutions for deposit
insurance. This assessment is based on the risk category of the
institution and currently ranges from five to 43 basis
points of the institutions deposits. In February 2009, the
FDIC published the final rule that will raise the current
deposit insurance assessment rates (to a range from 8 to
77.5 basis points) in 2009 and included an interim rule
related to a one time assessment of 20 basis points as of
the June 30, 2009, payable September 30, 2009.
Based upon our initial review of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporations final rule, our annual expense for FDIC
insurance based on deposits as of December 31, 2008, would
increase by approximately $1.3 million. Additionally our
expense would increase an additional $2.0 million based the
interim rule related to the one time assessment of 20 basis
points.
Our
concentration in Multifamily Loan, Commercial Real Estate Loans
and Construction and Land Lending Could Expose Us To Increased
Lending Risks and related Loan Losses.
Our current business strategy is to continue to emphasize
multifamily loans and to a lesser extent commercial real estate
loans. At December 31, 2008, $449.8 million, or 76.3%
of our total loan portfolio, consisted of multifamily,
commercial real estate, and construction and land loans. As a
result, our credit risk profile may be higher than traditional
thrift institutions that have higher concentrations of one- to
four-family
33
mortgage loans. In addition, at December 31, 2008, our
largest concentration of commercial real estate loans was hotel
and motel loans, which totaled $31.3 million, or 10.8% of
commercial real estate loans at that date.
A
Significant Portion of Our Loan Portfolio is
Unseasoned
Our loan portfolio has grown to $589.9 million at
December 31, 2008 from $320.7 million at
December 31, 2004. It is difficult to assess the future
performance of these recently originated loans because of our
relatively limited experience in commercial real estate,
multifamily, and construction lending. We cannot assure you that
these loans will not have delinquency or charge-off levels above
our historical experience, which could adversely affect our
future performance.
If Our
Allowance for Loan Losses is Not Sufficient to Cover Actual Loan
Losses, Our Earnings Could Decrease
We make various assumptions and judgments about the
collectibility of our loan portfolio, including the
creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real
estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment
of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance
for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and
delinquency experience, and we evaluate other factors including,
among other things, current economic conditions. If our
assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not
be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio,
resulting in additions to our allowance. Material additions to
our allowance could materially decrease our net income.
In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance
for loan losses and may, based upon information available to
them at the time of their review, require us to increase our
allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs.
An increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs
as required by these regulatory authorities may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Because
Most of Our Borrowers are Located in the New York Metropolitan
Area, a Downturn in the Local Economy, a Decline in Local Real
Estate Values Could Cause an Increase in Nonperforming Loans, or
a Decrease in Loan Demand, Which Could Reduce our
Profits.
Substantially all of the loans in our loan portfolio are secured
by real estate located in our primary market areas. Negative
conditions in the economic and real estate markets where our
borrowers and collateral are located could adversely affect the
ability of our borrowers to repay their loans and the value of
the collateral securing the loans. Real estate values are
affected by various other factors, including supply and demand,
changes in general or regional economic conditions, interest
rates, governmental rules or policies, natural disasters and
terrorist attacks.
Negative economic conditions could also result in reduced loan
demand and a decline in loan originations.
Changes
in Market Interest Rates Could Adversely Affect Our Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Our financial condition and results of operations are
significantly affected by changes in market interest rates. Our
results of operations substantially depend on our net interest
income, which is the difference between the interest income we
earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense we
pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-bearing
liabilities generally reprice or mature more quickly than our
interest-earning assets. If rates increase rapidly as a result
of perceived inflationary pressures, we may have to increase the
rates paid on our deposits and borrowed funds more quickly than
loans and investments reprice, resulting in a negative effect on
interest spreads and net interest income. In addition, the
effect of rising rates could be compounded if deposit customers
move funds from savings accounts to higher rate certificate of
deposit accounts. Conversely, should market interest rates
continue to fall below current levels, our net interest margin
could also be negatively affected, as competitive pressures
could keep us from further reducing rates on our deposits, and
prepayments and curtailments on assets may continue.
34
We also are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes
in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect the
average life of loans and mortgage-related securities. Decreases
in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans
and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance their
loans to reduce borrowings costs. Under these circumstances, we
are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent that we are
unable to reinvest the cash received from such prepayments in
loans or other investments that have interest rates that are
comparable to the interest rates on existing loans and
securities. Additionally, increases in interest rates may
decrease loan demand
and/or may
make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate
loans.
Changes in interest rates also affect the value of our interest
earning assets and in particular our securities portfolio.
Generally, the value of securities fluctuates inversely with
changes in interest rates.
Strong
Competition Within Our Market Areas May Limit Our Growth and
Profitability
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is
intense. In our market areas, we compete with commercial banks,
savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, money market funds, insurance
companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating
locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have greater name
recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting
business, and offer certain services that we do not or cannot
provide. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price
loans and deposits more aggressively than we do.
In addition, recent turmoil in the United States and world
economies, and more specifically in the financial services
industry, has resulted in financial services companies such as
investment banking institutions, and automobile and real estate
finance companies, electing to become bank holding companies.
These financial services companies have traditionally received
their funding from sources other than insured bank deposits.
Many of the alternative funding sources traditionally utilized
by these companies is no longer available and has resulted in
these companies relying more on insured bank deposits to fund
their operations, increasing competition for deposits and
related costs of such deposits.
Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to
successfully compete in our market areas. For additional
information see Business of Northfield Bank
Market Area and Competition.
The Need
to Account for Certain Assets at Estimated Fair Value May
Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations
We report certain assets, including securities, at fair value.
Generally, for assets that are reported at fair value we use
quoted market prices or valuation models that utilize market
data inputs to estimate fair value. Because we carry these
assets on our books at their estimated fair value, we may incur
losses even if the asset in question presents minimal credit
risk. Given the continued disruption in the capital markets, we
may be required to recognize
other-than-temporary
impairments in future periods with respect to our securities
portfolio. The amount and timing of any impairment recognized
will depend on the severity and duration of the decline in the
estimated fair value of the securities and our estimation of the
anticipated recovery period.
If the
Companys Investment in the Common Stock of the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York is Classified as
Other-Than-Temporarily
Impaired or as Permanently Impaired, Earnings and
Stockholders Equity Could Decrease
The Company owns stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
(FHLB). The FHLB common stock is held to qualify for membership
in the Federal Home Loan Bank System and to be eligible to
borrow funds under the FHLBs advance programs. The
aggregate cost of our FHLB common stock as of December 31,
2008, was $9.4 million based on its par value. There is no
market for FHLB common stock.
Recent published reports indicate that certain member banks of
the Federal Home Loan Bank System may be subject to accounting
rules and asset quality risks that could result in materially
lower regulatory capital levels. In an extreme situation, it is
possible that the capital of a Federal Home Loan Bank system,
including the FHLB, could be substantially diminished or reduced
to zero. Consequently, there is a risk that the Companys
investment
35
in FHLB common stock could be deemed
other-than-temporarily
impaired at some time in the future, and if this occurs, it
would cause earnings and stockholders equity to decrease
by the impairment charge.
Risks
Associated with System Failures, Interruptions, or Breaches of
Security Could Negatively Affect Our Earnings
Information technology systems are critical to our business. We
use various technology systems to manage our customer
relationships, general ledger, securities, deposits, and loans.
We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit
the impact of system failures, interruptions, and security
breaches, but there can be no assurance that such events will
not occur or that they will be adequately addressed if they do.
In addition any compromise of our systems could deter customers
from using our products and services. Although we rely on
security systems to provide security and authentication
necessary to effect the secure transmission of data, these
precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or
breaches of security.
In addition, we outsource a majority of our data processing to
certain third-party providers. If these third-party providers
encounter difficulties, or if we have difficulty in
communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and
account for transactions could be affected, and our business
operations could be adversely impacted. Threats to information
security also exist in the processing of customer information
through various other vendors and their personnel.
The occurrence of any system failures, interruption, or breach
of security could damage our reputation and result in a loss of
customers and business subjecting us to additional regulatory
scrutiny, or could expose us to litigation and possible
financial liability. Any of these events could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
We Are
Subject to Extensive Regulatory Oversight
We and our subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and
supervision. Regulators have intensified their focus on bank
lending criteria and controls, and on the USA PATRIOT Acts
anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act compliance
requirements. There is also increased scrutiny of our compliance
with the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
In order to comply with regulations, guidelines and examination
procedures in the anti-money laundering area, we have been
required to adopt policies and procedures and to install
systems. We cannot be certain that the policies, procedures and
systems we have in place are flawless. Therefore, there is no
assurance that in every instance we are in full compliance with
these requirements. Our failure to comply with these and other
regulatory requirements can lead to, among other remedies,
administrative enforcement actions, and legal proceedings. In
addition, recently enacted, proposed and future legislation and
regulations have had, will continue to have or may have
significant impact on the financial services industry.
Regulatory or legislative changes could make regulatory
compliance more difficult or expensive for us, and could cause
us to change or limit some of our products and services, or the
way we operate our business.
We Have
Implemented an Equity Incentive Plan That Will Increase
Operating Expenses
We have issued restricted stock and stock options to certain
employees and directors in accordance with the 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan. The grants were made in January 2009, and
generally vest over five years. In the event of certain events
as defined by the plan, including death, disability, retirement
(for employees only) and a termination following a change in
control, the vesting of restricted stock and option grants
accelerate. Compensation expense will increase significantly as
a result of these awards.
The Price
and Trading of Our Common Stock is Subject to Various Factors
Many That Are Out of the Control of the Company
The price of our common stock can fluctuate significantly in
response to various factors, including, but not limited to:
actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;
news reports regarding trends and issues in the financial
services industry; the real estate market; interest rates;
earnings estimates and recommendations of securities analyst;
the performance and stock price of other companies that
investors or analyst deem comparable to us; actual or
anticipated changes in the economy; capital market activities;
mergers and acquisitions involving our peers and speculation
regarding our merger and acquisition activities; speculation
about, or an actual change, dividend payments; changes in
legislation or regulation impacting
36
financial services industry in particular, or publicly traded
companies in general; regulatory enforcement or other actions
against the Company or the Bank or its affiliates; threats of
terrorism or military conflicts; and in general market
fluctuations. Fluctuations in our stock price may make it more
difficult for you to sell your common stock at an attractive
price.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
No unresolved staff comments.
The Bank operates from its home office in Staten Island, New
York and our additional 17 branch offices located in New York
and New Jersey. Our branch offices are located in the New York
Counties of Richmond, and Kings and the New Jersey Counties of
Middlesex and Union. The net book value of our premises, land,
and equipment was $8.9 million at December 31, 2008.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In the normal course of business, we may be party to various
outstanding legal proceedings and claims. In the opinion of
management, the consolidated financial statements will not be
materially affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and
claims as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this
report, we submitted one matter to the vote of security holders.
A Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the
Meeting) was held on December 17, 2008. There
were outstanding and entitled to vote at the Meeting
44,803,061 shares of Common Stock of the Company, including
24,641,684 shares held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC, the
mutual holding parent of the Company, which held 55% of the
outstanding stock. The shares of Northfield Bancorp, MHC were
only eligible to vote for purposes of determining a quorum.
There were present at the meeting or by proxy the holders of
35,986,726 shares of Common Stock representing 80.3% of the
total shares entitled to vote. The proposal considered and voted
on by the Companys stockholders at the Meeting and the
vote of the stockholders eligible to vote (excluding the
24,641,684 shares of Northfield Bancorp, MHC) was as
follows:
Proposal 1. Approval of the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
9,963,795
|
|
1,270,398
|
|
110,849
|
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
(a) Our shares of common stock are traded on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the symbol NFBK. The
approximate number of holders of record of Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.s common stock as of December 31, 2008 was 5,238.
Certain shares of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. are held in
nominee or street name and accordingly,
the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or
included in the foregoing number. The following table presents
quarterly market information for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s
37
common stock for the periods indicated. The following
information was provided by the NASDAQ Global Stock Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
12.50
|
|
|
$
|
9.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
$
|
10.25
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
11.75
|
|
|
$
|
10.02
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
10.77
|
|
|
$
|
9.78
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The sources of funds for the payment of a cash dividend are the
retained proceeds from the initial sale of shares of common
stock and earnings on those proceeds, interest, and principal
payments on Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s investments,
including its loan to Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s Employee
Stock Ownership Plan, and dividends from Northfield Bank.
For a discussion of Northfield Banks ability to pay
dividends, see Supervision and Regulation
Federal Banking Regulation.
38
Stock
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a stock performance graph comparing
(a) the cumulative total return on the Companys
Common Stock for the period November 8, 2007, through
December 31, 2008, (b) the cumulative total return of
the stocks included in the Nasdaq Composite Index over such
period, and, (c) the cumulative total return on stocks
included in the Nasdaq Bank Index over such period. Cumulative
return assumes the reinvestment of dividends, and is expressed
in dollars based on an assumed investment of $100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
|
11/8/2007
|
|
|
11/30/2007
|
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
3/31/2008
|
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
|
9/30/2008
|
|
|
12/31/2008
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
102.20
|
|
|
|
|
103.54
|
|
|
|
|
98.09
|
|
|
|
|
102.87
|
|
|
|
|
115.89
|
|
|
|
|
108.02
|
|
NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
102.50
|
|
|
|
|
96.93
|
|
|
|
|
92.77
|
|
|
|
|
74.65
|
|
|
|
|
88.30
|
|
|
|
|
73.74
|
|
NASDAQ Composite Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
98.70
|
|
|
|
|
98.38
|
|
|
|
|
84.54
|
|
|
|
|
85.05
|
|
|
|
|
77.59
|
|
|
|
|
58.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has in place at December 31, 2008, the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan which was approved by stockholders on
December 17, 2008. The 2008 Equity Incentive Plan provides
for the issuance of up to 3,073,488 equity awards. On
January 30, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors awarded 832,450 shares of restricted stock,
and 2,102,600 stock options with tandem stock appreciation
rights.
39
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The summary information presented below at the dates or for each
of the years presented is derived in part from our consolidated
financial statements. The following information is only a
summary, and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and notes included in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Financial Condition Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,294,747
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,566,564
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
60,624
|
|
|
|
38,368
|
|
|
|
94,297
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Securities available-for-sale, at estimated market value
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
802,417
|
|
|
|
713,098
|
|
|
|
863,064
|
|
|
|
1,012,367
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
19,686
|
|
|
|
26,169
|
|
|
|
34,841
|
|
|
|
56,148
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
404,159
|
|
|
|
382,672
|
|
|
|
317,525
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
42,001
|
|
|
|
41,560
|
|
|
|
32,866
|
|
|
|
31,635
|
|
|
|
30,425
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
6,702
|
|
|
|
7,186
|
|
|
|
11,529
|
|
|
|
15,675
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,371,183
|
|
|
|
1,019,578
|
|
|
|
1,130,753
|
|
|
|
1,256,803
|
|
|
|
1,414,580
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
332,084
|
|
|
|
124,420
|
|
|
|
128,534
|
|
|
|
233,629
|
|
|
|
361,708
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
877,225
|
|
|
|
989,789
|
|
|
|
1,010,146
|
|
|
|
1,041,533
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
163,994
|
|
|
|
151,759
|
|
|
|
151,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
75,049
|
|
|
$
|
65,702
|
|
|
$
|
64,867
|
|
|
$
|
66,302
|
|
|
$
|
58,851
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
28,836
|
|
|
|
28,406
|
|
|
|
24,234
|
|
|
|
18,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
|
|
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
36,866
|
|
|
|
36,461
|
|
|
|
42,068
|
|
|
|
40,579
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
35,424
|
|
|
|
36,226
|
|
|
|
40,439
|
|
|
|
40,169
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
|
|
5,401
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
24,852
|
|
|
|
35,950
|
|
|
|
23,818
|
|
|
|
21,258
|
|
|
|
19,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
17,008
|
|
|
|
23,535
|
|
|
|
26,034
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
10,376
|
|
|
|
9,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
$
|
10,507
|
|
|
$
|
10,842
|
|
|
$
|
13,159
|
|
|
$
|
16,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
|
|
43,076,586
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share in 2007 is calculated for the period that the
Companys shares of common stock were outstanding
(November 8, 2007 through December 31, 2007). The net
loss for this period was $1,500,000. |
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)(1)
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)(1)
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
|
|
11.34
|
%
|
Interest rate spread(1)(3)
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
|
|
2.71
|
%
|
Net interest margin(1)(2)
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
|
2.91
|
%
|
Dividend payout ratio(6)
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio(1)(4)
|
|
|
46.94
|
%
|
|
|
77.57
|
%
|
|
|
58.01
|
%
|
|
|
45.79
|
%
|
|
|
42.49
|
%
|
Non-interest expense to average total assets(1)
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
1.77
|
%
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
136.94
|
%
|
|
|
123.33
|
%
|
|
|
118.89
|
%
|
|
|
115.69
|
%
|
|
|
115.25
|
%
|
Average equity to average total assets
|
|
|
23.84
|
%
|
|
|
14.73
|
%
|
|
|
11.47
|
%
|
|
|
10.21
|
%
|
|
|
9.97
|
%
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
91.07
|
%
|
|
|
57.31
|
%
|
|
|
70.70
|
%
|
|
|
232.88
|
%
|
|
|
136.58
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
1.49
|
%
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)(5)
|
|
|
34.81
|
%
|
|
|
38.07
|
%
|
|
|
25.03
|
%
|
|
|
23.72
|
%
|
|
|
23.81
|
%
|
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)(5)
|
|
|
33.68
|
%
|
|
|
37.23
|
%
|
|
|
24.25
|
%
|
|
|
22.97
|
%
|
|
|
23.27
|
%
|
Tier I capital (to adjusted assets (OTS), average assets
FDIC)(5)
|
|
|
15.98
|
%
|
|
|
18.84
|
%
|
|
|
12.38
|
%
|
|
|
10.62
|
%
|
|
|
9.15
|
%
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service offices
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Full time equivalent employees
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
2008 performance ratios include a $2.5 million tax-exempt
gain from the death of an officer and $463,000 ($292,000, net of
tax) in costs associated with the Banks conversion to a
new core processing system that was completed in January 2009.
2007 performance ratios include the after-tax effect of: a
charge of $7.8 million due to the Companys
contribution to the Northfield Bank Foundation; a gain of
$2.4 million as a result of the sale of two branch
locations, and associated deposit relationships; net interest
income of approximately $0.8 million, for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as it relates to short-term investment
returns earned on subscription proceeds (net of interest paid
during the stock offering); and the reversal of state and local
tax liabilities of approximately $4.5 million, net of
federal taxes. 2006 performance ratios include the after tax
effect of a $0.9 million charge related to a supplemental
retirement agreement entered into by the Company with its former
president. |
|
(2) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a
percent of average interest-earning assets for the period. |
|
(3) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the
weighted-average yield on interest earning assets and the
weighted-average costs of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by
the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. |
|
(5) |
|
Ratios for 2004 through 2006 were determined pursuant to Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations. Beginning
November 6, 2007, Northfield Bank became subject to the
capital requirements under Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations, while the capital regulations of these two agencies
are substantially similar, they are not identical. |
|
(6) |
|
Dividend payout ratio is calculated as total dividends declared
for the year (excluding dividends waived by Northfield Bancorp,
MHC) divided by net income for the year. |
41
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report
(collectively, the Financial Statements).
Overview
On November 7, 2007, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. completed its
initial stock offering whereby the Company sold
19,265,316 shares of common stock, for a price of $10.00
per share. The transaction closed at the adjusted maximum level
of shares permitted by the offering. The shares sold represented
43.0% of the shares of the Companys common stock
outstanding following the stock offering. The Company also
contributed 2.0% of the shares of our outstanding common stock,
or 896,061 shares, and $3.0 million in cash, to the
Northfield Bank Foundation, a charitable foundation established
by Northfield Bank. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, the Companys
federally chartered mutual holding company parent, owns 55.0% of
the Companys outstanding common stock as of
December 31, 2008.
Our goal as a public company is to enhance stockholder value
through the continual enhancement of our banking franchise that
focuses on offering competitively priced products, through
superior customer service, and a convenient branch and
electronic delivery system. We also continue to focus on growing
our core business of originating multifamily real estate, and
commercial real estate loans and establishing deposit
relationships in the markets we serve, while maintaining strong
asset quality and controlling operating expenses. We believe
that focusing on Northfield as place where people want to work,
customers want to bank, and investors want to invest, will
provide the greatest long-term value to our stockholders.
Total assets increased to $1.8 billion at December 31,
2008, an approximate $370 million increase, as compared to
$1.4 billion at December 31, 2007. The increases were
primarily in loans held-for-investment, net of
$165.7 million, securities available-for-sale of
$155.2 million, and cash and cash equivalents and
certificates of deposits of $54.2 million. The increases in
these asset categories was primarily related to increased loan
originations in 2008, implementation of ongoing securities
leverage strategies within our board approved risk parameters,
and the maintenance of additional liquidity in the current
negative economic climate. Total liabilities increased to
$1.4 billion at December 31, 2008, from
$1.0 billion at December 31, 2007. The increase was
primarily attributable to increases in deposits of
$147.2 million and borrowings (securities sold under
reverse repurchase agreements and other borrowings) of
$207.7 million. The increase in deposits was primarily due
to an increase on $131.4 million in savings accounts (money
market and statement) due to deposit promotions implemented in
2008. The increase in borrowings was due primarily to the
execution of leverage strategies.
At December 31, 2008, non-performing assets totaled
$10.7 million (0.61% of total assets) and consisted of
$9.6 million of non-performing loans (1.63% of loans held
for investment, net) and $1.1 million of other real estate
owned. At December 31, 2007, non-performing assets,
consisting solely of non-performing loans, totaled
$9.8 million (0.71% of total assets and 2.32% of loans held
for investment, net). There was no other real estate owned at
December 31, 2007.
Net income increased $5.3 million, to $15.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Net income for 2008 and 2007 included certain significant
non-routine items (net of tax effect.)
Included in 2008 net income is a $2.5 million
tax-exempt gain from the death of an officer and $463,000
($292,000, net of tax) in costs associated with the Banks
conversion to a new core processing system that was completed in
January 2009. Included in 2007 net income is a
$12.0 million ($7.8 million, net of tax) charge
related to the Companys contribution to the Northfield
Bank Foundation, which was substantially offset by net interest
income of approximately $1.4 million ($795,000, net of tax)
related to short-term investment returns earned on subscription
proceeds (net of interest paid during the stock offering), the
reversal of state and local tax liabilities of
$4.5 million, net of federal taxes, as a result of the
Company concluding an audit by
42
the State of New York with respect to the Companys
combined state tax returns for years 2000 through 2006, and a
gain of $4.3 million ($2.4 million, net of tax)
related to the sale of two branch locations and associated
deposit relationships.
Recent
Events
Stock
Repurchase Plan
On February 13, 2009, we announced that the Board of
Directors authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to
which we intend to repurchase up to 2,240,153 shares of our
common stock.
Equity
Awards
On January 30, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors awarded 832,450 shares of restricted
stock, and 2,102,600 stock options with tandem stock
appreciation rights to employees and directors in accordance
with the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan approved by the stockholders
of the Company on December 17, 2008.
Dividend
Declaration
On January 28, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a cash
dividend of $0.04 per share, payable February 25, 2009, to
stockholders of record at the close business on
February 11, 2009.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially
result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions. We believe that the most critical
accounting policies upon which our financial condition and
results of operation depend, and which involve the most complex
subjective decisions or assessments, are the following:
Allowance for Loan Losses, Impaired Loans, and Troubled Debt
Restructurings. The allowance for loan losses is
the estimated amount considered necessary to cover probable and
reasonably estimatable credit losses inherent in the loan
portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is
established through the provision for loan losses that is
charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan
losses, we make significant estimates and judgments and,
therefore, have identified the allowance as a critical
accounting policy. The methodology for determining the allowance
for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by
management because of the high degree of judgment involved, the
subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for
changes in the economic environment that could result in changes
to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance
with GAAP. We are responsible for the timely and periodic
determination of the amount of the allowance required. We
believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover
identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our
portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not
specifically identifiable.
Management performs a formal quarterly evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The analysis of the
allowance for loan losses has a component for impaired loan
losses and a component for general loan losses. Management has
defined an impaired loan to be a loan for which it is probable,
based on current information, that the Company will not collect
all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. We have defined the population of impaired loans
to be all non-accrual loans with an outstanding balance of
$500,000 or greater, and all loans subject to a troubled debt
restructuring. Impaired loans are individually assessed to
determine that the loans carrying value is not in excess
of the estimated fair value of the collateral (less cost to
sell), if the loan is collateral dependent, or the present value
of the expected future cash flows, if the loan is not collateral
dependent. Management performs a detailed evaluation of each
impaired loan and adjusts estimated fair values to appropriately
consider existing market conditions and costs to dispose of any
supporting collateral. Determining the estimated fair value of
underlying loan collateral (and related costs to sell) can be
43
difficult in illiquid real estate markets and is subject to
significant assumptions and estimates. Projecting the expected
cash flows under troubled debt restructurings is inherently
subjective and requires, among other things, an evaluation of
the borrowers current and projected financial condition.
Actual results may be significantly different than our
projections, and our established allowance for loan losses on
these loans, and could have a material effect on our financial
results.
The second component of the allowance for loan losses is the
general loss allocation. This assessment is performed on a
portfolio basis, excluding impaired and trouble debt
restructured loans, with loans being grouped into similar risk
characteristics, primarily loan type, loan-to-value (if
collateral dependent) and delinquency status. We apply an
estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates applied
are based on our loss experience as adjusted for our qualitative
assessment of relevant changes related to: underwriting
standards; delinquency trends; collection, charge-off and
recovery practices; the nature or volume of the loan group;
lending staff; concentration of loan type; current economic
conditions; and other relevant factors considered appropriate by
management. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it
requires material estimates that may be susceptible to
significant revisions based on changes in economic and real
estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be
significantly different than the allowance for loan losses we
have established, and could have a material effect on our
financial results.
Management reviews the status of our loans in order to evaluate
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly
basis. As part of this evaluation process, impaired loans are
analyzed to determine their potential risk of loss. To determine
the adequacy of collateral on a particular loan, an estimate of
the fair value of the collateral is based on the most current
appraised value and adjusted to reflect current market and
property specific conditions, net of estimated costs to sell.
Any shortfall results in a recommendation of a charge to the
allowance if the likelihood of loss is evaluated as probable.
This quarterly process is performed by credit administration and
approved by the Chief Lending Officer. The Chief Financial
Officer performs a final review of the calculation. All
supporting documentation with regard to the evaluation process
is maintained by credit administration. Each quarter a summary
of the allowance for loan losses is presented by the Chief
Lending Officer to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
We have a concentration of loans secured by real property
located in New York and New Jersey. As a substantial amount of
our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals
of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical
in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific
loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in
determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic
assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could
significantly impact the valuation of a property securing a loan
and the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting
such appraisals are reviewed by management to determine that the
resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the
collateral. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, we
believe the primary risks are increases in interest rates, a
decline in the economy generally, and a decline in real estate
market values in New York or New Jersey. Any one or a
combination of these events may adversely affect our loan
portfolio resulting in delinquencies, increased loan losses, and
future loan loss provisions.
Although we believe we have established and maintained the
allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, changes may be
necessary if future economic or other conditions differ
substantially from our estimation of the current operating
environment. Although management uses the information available,
the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate
that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.
In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral
part of their examination process, will periodically review our
allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to
recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments
about information available to them at the time of their
examination.
We also maintain an allowance for estimated losses on
off-balance sheet credit risks related to loan commitments and
standby letters of credit. Management utilizes a methodology
similar to its allowance
44
for loan loss methodology to estimate losses on these items. The
allowance for estimated credit losses on these items is included
in other liabilities and any changes to the allowance are
recorded as a component of other non-interest expense.
Goodwill. Acquisitions accounted for under
purchase accounting must follow SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
SFAS No. 141 requires us to record as assets on our
financial statements goodwill, an unidentifiable intangible
asset which is equal to the excess of the purchase price which
we pay for another company over the estimated fair value of the
net assets acquired. Net assets acquired include identifiable
intangible assets such as core deposit intangibles and
non-compete agreements. Under SFAS No. 142, we
evaluate goodwill for impairment annually on December 31,
and more often if circumstances warrant, and we will reduce its
carrying value through a charge to earnings if impairment
exists. The valuation techniques used by us to determine the
carrying value of tangible and intangible assets acquired in
acquisitions and the estimated lives of identifiable intangible
assets involve estimates for discount rates, projected future
cash flows and time period calculations, all of which are
susceptible to change based on changes in economic conditions
and other factors. Future events or changes in the estimates
that we use to determine the carrying value of our goodwill or
which otherwise adversely affect its value could have a material
adverse impact on our results of operations. As of
December 31, 2008, goodwill had a carrying value of
$16.2 million.
Securities Valuation and Impairment. Our
securities portfolio is comprised of mortgage-backed securities
and to a lesser extent corporate bonds and mutual funds. Our
available-for-sale securities portfolio is carried at estimated
fair value, with any unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes,
reported as accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in
stockholders equity. Our trading securities portfolio is
reported at estimated fair value. Our held-to-maturity
securities portfolio, consisting of debt securities for which we
have a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is
carried at amortized cost. We conduct a quarterly review and
evaluation of the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
securities portfolios to determine if the estimated fair value
of any security has declined below its amortized cost, and
whether such decline is other-than-temporary. If such decline is
deemed other-than-temporary, we adjust the cost basis of the
security by writing down the security to estimated fair value
through a charge to current period operations. The estimated
fair values of our securities are primarily affected by changes
in interest rates, credit quality, and market liquidity.
Management is responsible for determining the estimated fair
value of the Companys securities. In determining estimated
fair values, management utilizes the services of an independent
third party recognized as an expert in pricing securities. The
independent pricing service utilizes market prices of same or
similar securities whenever such prices are available. Prices
involving distressed sellers are not utilized in determining
fair value. Where necessary, the independent third party pricing
service estimates fair value using models employing techniques
such as discounted cash flow analyses. The assumptions used in
these models typically include assumptions for interest rates,
credit losses, and prepayments, utilizing market observable
data, where available. Where the market price of the same or
similar securities is not available, the valuation becomes more
subjective and involves a high degree of judgment. On a
quarterly basis, we review the pricing methodologies utilized by
the independent third party pricing service for each security
type. In addition, we compare securities prices to a second
independent pricing service that is utilized as part of our
asset liability risk management process. At December 31,
2008, and for each quarter end in 2008, all securities were
priced by the independent third party pricing service, and
management made no adjustment to the prices received.
Determining that a securities decline in estimated fair value is
other-than-temporary, is inherently subjective, and becomes
increasing difficult as it relates to mortgage-backed securities
that are not guaranteed by the U.S. Government, or a
U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprise (e.g.. Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac). In performing our evaluation of securities in an
unrealized loss position, we consider among other things, the
severity, and duration of time that the security has been in an
unrealized loss position and the credit quality of the issuer.
As it relates to mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by
the U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, we perform
a review of the key underlying loan collateral risk
characteristics including, among other things, origination
dates, interest rates levels,
45
composition of variable and fixed rates, reset dates (including
related pricing indexes), current loan to original collateral
values, locations of collateral, delinquency status of loans,
and current credit support. In addition, for securities
experiencing declines in estimated fair values of over 10%, as
compared to its amortized cost, management also reviews
historical and expected underlying loan collateral default rates
and related historical and expected losses on the disposal of
the underlying collateral on defaulted loans. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires estimates of future events,
many of which are difficult to predict. Actual results could be
significantly different than our estimates and could have a
material effect on our financial results.
Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and
liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. If it is
determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is
established. We consider the determination of this valuation
allowance to be a critical accounting policy because of the need
to exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and
timing of recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets,
including projections of future taxable income. These judgments
and estimates are reviewed quarterly as regulatory and business
factors change. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
may be required if the amounts of taxes recoverable through loss
carry backs decline, or if we project lower levels of future
taxable income. Such a valuation allowance would be established
and any subsequent changes to such allowance would require an
adjustment to income tax expense that could adversely affect our
operating results.
Comparison
of Financial Condition at December 31, 2008 and
2007
Total assets increased $370.8 million, or 26.7%, to
$1.758 billion at December 31, 2008, from
$1.386 billion at December 31, 2007, and was
reflective of increases in cash and cash equivalents, and
certificates of deposits of $54.2 million, securities
available-for-sale of $155.2 million, and loans
held-for-investment, net of $165.7 million.
Cash and cash equivalents (cash and due from banks,
interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions and
federal funds sold) increased $25.0 million, or 99.8%, to
$50.1 million at December 31, 2008, from
$25.1 million at December 31, 2007. This increase was
primarily the result of the Company maintaining increased
balances at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and to a
lesser extent, well-capitalized financial institutions, to
maintain additional liquidity in the current negative economic
and credit environment.
Securities available-for-sale increased $155.2 million, or
19.3%, to $957.6 million at December 31, 2008, from
$802.4 million at December 31, 2007. The increase was
primarily due to the purchase of approximately $421.7 million of
securities partially offset by pay-downs, maturities, and sales
of $273.4 million. The purchases were primarily funded by
borrowings, pay-downs and maturities. The Company continued to
implement securities leveraging strategies in 2008 within board
approved risk parameters.
Loans held-for-investment, net of deferred loan fees, increased
$165.7 million, or 39.0%, to $589.9 million at
December 31, 2008, from $424.3 million at
December 31, 2007. Commercial real estate and multifamily
real estate loans increased $139.6 million, or 54.1%, to
$397.7 million at December 31, 2008, from
$258.1 million at December 31, 2007. We continue to
focus on originating multifamily, and commercial real estate
loans to the extent such loan demand exists while meeting our
underwriting standards. One-to-four-family residential mortgage
loans increased $7.9 million, or 8.3%, to
$103.1 million at December 31, 2008, from
$95.2 million at December 31, 2007. Construction and
land loans increased $7.3 million, or 16.3%, to
$52.2 million at December 31, 2008, from
$44.9 million at December 31, 2007. Home equity loans
and lines of credit increased $11.4 million, or 89.0%, to
$24.2 million at December 31, 2008, from
$12.8 million at December 31, 2007.
Deposits increased $147.2 million, or 16.8%, to
$1,024 billion at December 31, 2008, from
$877.2 million at December 31, 2007. Savings and money
market accounts increased $131.4 million, or 41.3%, to
46
$449.3 million at December 31, 2008, from
$317.9 million at December 31, 2007. Certificates of
deposit increased $15.0 million, or 3.7%, to
$417.6 million at December 31, 2008, from
$402.6 million at December 31, 2007. Transaction
accounts decreased modestly. The increases in deposits was
attributable primarily to the Companys continued focus on
growing the deposit franchise by offering competitive pricing,
including the introduction in 2008 of a money market account and
a high-yielding statement savings account.
Total borrowings increased $207.7 million, or 167.0%, to
$332.1 million at December 31, 2008, from
$124.4 million at December 31, 2007. The increase in
borrowings was attributable primarily to securities leveraging
strategies implemented in 2008.
Total stockholders equity increased $19.2 million, or
5.2% to $386.6 million at December 31, 2008, from
$367.3 million at December 31, 2007. The increase was
due primarily to net income of $15.8 million in 2008, and a
reduction of accumulated other comprehensive losses (primarily a
decrease in unrealized losses on securities available for sale,
net of tax). Unrealized losses on securities available for sale
decreased, in part, due to a general decline in interest rates
which typically results in increases in the estimated fair value
of the Companys securities available for sale. These
increases were partially offset by the declaration of
approximately $738,000 in cash dividends in 2008.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2008
and 2007
General. Net income increased
$5.3 million or 50.7%, to $15.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $10.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. Included in 2008 net
income is a $2.5 million tax-exempt gain from the death of
an officer and $463,000 ($292,000, net of tax) in costs
associated with the Banks conversion to a new core
processing system that was completed in January 2009. Included
in 2007 net income is a $12.0 million
($7.8 million, net of tax) charge related to the
Companys contribution to the Northfield Bank Foundation,
which was substantially offset by net interest income of
approximately $1.4 million ($795,000, net of tax) related
to short-term investment returns earned on subscription proceeds
(net of interest paid during the stock offering), the reversal
of state and local tax liabilities of $4.5 million, net of
federal taxes, as a result of the Company concluding an audit by
the State of New York with respect to the Companys
combined state tax returns for years 2000 through 2006, and a
gain of $4.3 million ($2.4 million, net of tax)
related to the sale of two branch locations and associated
deposit relationships.
Interest Income. Interest income increased by
$9.3 million, or 14.2%, to $75.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $65.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $207.2 million, or 16.1%, partially offset by a
decrease in the average rate earned of eight basis points, or
1.6%, to 5.03% for the year ended December 31, 2008, from
5.11% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest income on loans increased $3.2 million, or 11.3%,
to $31.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $28.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The average balance of loans increased $80.0 million,
or 18.9%, to $503.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $423.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, reflecting our current efforts to
grow our multifamily and commercial real estate loan portfolios.
The yield on our loan portfolio decreased 43 basis points,
or 6.4%, to 6.27% for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from 6.70% for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily
as a result of decreases in interest rates on our
adjustable-rate loans, and the generally lower interest rate
environment in 2008. The Federal Reserve decreased short-term
rates 400 basis points during 2008.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased
$7.5 million, or 24.5%, to $38.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $30.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The increase resulted from an
increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of
$126.2 million, or 17.6%, to $844.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $718.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is due
primarily to the implementation of ongoing leveraging strategies
within board approved risk parameters. The yield we earned on
mortgage-backed securities increased 25 basis points to
4.51% for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 4.26% for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
47
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions
decreased $749,000, or 18.2%, to $3.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $4.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of
deposits in other financial institutions increased
$5.0 million, or 5.4%, to $97.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $92.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The yield on deposits in
other financial institutions decreased 100 basis points, or
22.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 4.46% for
the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to general
decline in the interest rate environment in 2008.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$580,000, or 2.01%, to $28.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $28.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The decrease resulted from an
increase of $47.7 million, or 4.6% in the average balance
of interest-bearing liabilities being more than offset by a
decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of
18 basis points, or 6.5%, to 2.59% for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from 2.77% for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased
$5.2 million, or 22.1%, to $18.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $23.8 million,
for the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease was due
to a decrease in average interest bearing deposits of
$101.6 million, or 11.1%, to $813.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $914.8 for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in average
interest-bearing deposits was the result of the Company
maintaining its deposit pricing discipline in 2008, and choosing
not to compete on interest rate, in certain circumstances. In
the latter part 2008, pricing competition somewhat
subsided, depositor awareness of a financial institutions
financial strength increased, and the introduction by the
Company of a competitively priced money market account, and
statement savings account, were the primary reasons that our
year end deposit balances increasing to over $1 billion.
The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased
32 basis points, or 12.3%, to 2.28% for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to 2.60% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The rate paid on certificates of deposit
decreased 91 basis points, or 20.9%, to 3.44% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 4.35%, for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The rate paid on savings, NOW, and
money market accounts increased 53 basis points, or 67.1%,
to 1.32% for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared
to 0.79%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to the
introduction of competitively priced money market and statement
savings accounts in the latter part of 2008.
Interest expense on borrowings (repurchase agreements and other
borrowings) increased $4.6 million, or 91.9%, to
$9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $5.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The average balance of borrowings increased
$149.3 million, or 116.7%, to $277.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $127.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of
borrowings increased due to the Company implementing securities
leverage strategies within board approved risk parameters in
2008. The average rate paid on borrowings decreased
46 basis points to 3.51%, or 11.6%, for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from 3.97% for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Net Interest Income. The increase in net
interest income of $9.9 million, or 26.9%, for the year
ended December 31, 2008, was primarily the result of an
increase in average interest-earning assets of
$207.2 million, or 16.1%, coupled with an increase in the
net interest margin of 26 basis points, or 9.1%, from 2.87%
to 3.13%. The change in average interest-earning assets and the
net interest margin, for the current year was due partially to
the Companys completion of its stock issuance in November
2007, resulting in gross proceeds of $192.7 million, which
included $82.4 million in transfers from deposit accounts.
The Company deployed the net proceeds into loans, short-term
investments, and securities.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a
provision for loan losses of $5.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, and $1.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. We had charge-offs of
$1.9 million and $836,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The allowance for
loans losses was $8.8 million, or 1.49% of total loans
receivable at December 31, 2008, compared to
$5.6 million, or 1.33% of total loans receivable at
December 31, 2007. The increase in the provision for loan
losses was due primarily to loan growth, provisions for impaired
loans, and increases in certain general loss factors utilized in
managements calculation of the allowance for loan losses
in response to continued deterioration in general real estate
collateral values and weakness in the overall economy.
48
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income
decreased $3.3 million or 35.1%, to $6.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, from $9.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease was
primarily attributable to a $4.3 million gain on the sale
of two branch offices and associated deposit relationships
recognized in March 2007. Non-interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2008, also included market losses of
$1.3 million on trading securities as compared to $71,000
in market gains for the year ended December 31, 2007. These
decreases were partially offset by the recognition of a
$2.5 million nontaxable death benefit realized on bank
owned life insurance for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense
decreased $11.1 million, or 30.9%, to $24.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, from
$36.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
This decrease was primarily attributable to the contribution of
shares of our common stock and cash with a value of
$12.0 million to the Northfield Bank Foundation during the
fourth quarter of 2007. In addition, compensation and employee
benefits decreased by $962,000, to $11.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $12.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease was
primarily related to $1.3 million in market losses on
trading securities utilized to fund the Companys deferred
compensation plan for certain officers and directors who chose
to defer all or a portion of their compensation from the
Company. The market losses recorded as a reduction to
non-interest income have the direct result of reducing amounts
owed to the deferred compensation plan participants. Excluding
this adjustment, compensation and employee benefits expense
increased approximately $338,000, or 2.6%, and was primarily the
result on annual cost of living, merit, and competitive market
adjustments to salaries.
Occupancy, and furniture and equipment expense increased
$946,000, or 24.2%, to $4.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to $3.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The increases were due to the
occupancy of our new back office operations center and
depreciation on capital improvements. Professional fees
increased $366,000, or 30.0%, to $1.6 million, for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $1.2 million,
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in
professional fees was due primarily to additional costs of being
a public company, third party consultants utilized to assist the
Company in complying with internal control reporting
requirements under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, and
third-party consultation related to the implementation of our
equity incentive plan.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded a
provision for income taxes of $7.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to a benefit of
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
increase in income tax expense of $8.7 million was due
primarily to the reversal of $4.5 million in state and
local income tax liabilities, net of federal taxes for the year
ended December 31, 2007. In 2007, the Company concluded an
audit by the State of New York with respect to the
Companys combined state tax returns for years 2000 through
2006. In addition, the increase in income tax expense for the
year ended December 31, 2008, was due to an increased level
of taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
compared to year ended December 31, 2007.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2007
and 2006
General. Net income decreased $335,000, or
3.1%, to $10.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2007, from $10.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The decrease was reflective of an
increase in non-interest expense and an increase in the
provision for loan losses, partially offset by an increase in
net interest income, total non-interest income, and a decrease
in income tax expense. For the year ended December 31,
2007, non-interest expense included a charge due to our
contribution to the Northfield Bank Foundation, net interest
income included net interest income earned on subscription
proceeds, non interest income included a gain as a result of the
sale of two branch locations and associated deposit
relationships, and income tax benefit included the reversal of
state and local tax liabilities, net of federal taxes. The
Company concluded an audit by the State of New York with respect
to the Companys combined state tax returns for years 2000
through 2006. Net income for the year ended December 31,
2006, reflects a charge related to a supplemental retirement
agreement entered into by the Company with its former president.
Interest Income. Interest income increased
$835,000, or 1.3%, to $65.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from $64.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The increase resulted from an
49
increase in the average yield earned on interest-earning assets
of 11 basis points to 5.11% for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from 5.00% for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The yield on interest-earning assets
increased primarily due to the change in the mix of average
earning assets. Average balances of loans as a percentage of
average interest-earning assets increased to 33.0% for the year
ended December 31, 2007, from 31.4% for the prior year. The
increase in average yield earned on interest-earning assets was
partially offset by a decrease of $12.2 million in the
average balances of interest-earning assets to
$1.286 billion for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $1.298 billion of the year ended December 31,
2006. The decrease in average interest-earning assets was due
primarily to a decrease in the average balance of
mortgage-backed securities of $81.0 million, partially
offset by an increase in average loans of $16.9 million and
interest earning deposits of $61.8 million in 2007 as
compared to 2006.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities decreased
$2.2 million, or 6.7%, to $30.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, from $32.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease resulted from a
decrease in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of
$81.0 million, or 10.1%, to $718.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007, from $799.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006. We used the proceeds from
principal repayments and maturities of securities
available-for-sale to fund loan originations and deposit
withdrawals and to repay borrowings. The yield we earned on
mortgage-backed securities increased 16 basis points to
4.26% for the year ended December 31, 2007, from 4.10% for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
Interest income on loans increased $876,000, or 3.2%, to
$28.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $27.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. The average balance of loans increased $16.9 million,
or 4.1%, to $423.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from $407.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006, reflecting our continued efforts
to grow our loan portfolio. The yield on our loan portfolio
decreased six basis points, to 6.70% for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from 6.76% for the year ended
December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of decreases in
interest rates on our adjustable-rate loans. The Federal Reserve
decreased short-term rates 100 basis points during the
second half of 2007.
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions
increased $2.5 million, or 158.1%, to $4.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, from $1.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006. The average balance
of deposits in other financial institutions increased
$61.8 million, or 202.9%, to $92.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007, from $30.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of
our holding liquid assets, representing proceeds from our
initial public stock offering. The yield on deposits in other
financial institutions decreased 77 basis points, to 4.46%
for the year ended December 31, 2007, from 5.23% for the
year ended December 31, 2006, primarily due to Federal
Reserve cuts on short-term rates of 100 basis points during
the second half of 2007.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$430,000, or 1.5%, to $28.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from $28.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The increase resulted from an
increase in interest expense on certificates of deposit and
interest bearing NOW accounts. Although the average balance of
total interest bearing deposits decreased in 2007 as compared to
2006, the composition of those deposits shifted to higher cost
deposits.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits increased
$1.8 million, or 8.3%, to $23.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, as compared to $21.9 million,
for the year ended December 31, 2006. This increase was due
to a increase in average interest bearing deposits of
$4.1 million, or 0.5%, to $914.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, from $910.6 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase in average interest-bearing
deposits was the result of an increase of $13.9 million in
the average balance of savings, NOW and money market accounts
partially offset by a decrease in the average balance of
certificate of deposits of $9.8 million. The average rate
paid on interest-bearing deposits increased 19 basis
points, or 7.8%, to 2.60% for the year ended December 31,
2007, as compared to 2.41% for the year ended December 31,
2006. The rate paid on certificates of deposit increased
39 basis points, or 9.8%, to 4.35% for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as compared to 3.96%, for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The rate paid on savings, NOW, and money
market accounts increased 7 basis points, or 9.7%, to 0.79%
for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to 0.72%,
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
50
Interest expense on borrowings (repurchase agreements and other
borrowings) decreased $1.4 million, or 21.6%, to
$5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $6.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. The average balance of borrowings decreased
$53.4 million, or 29.4%, to $127.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007, from $181.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006, as we used the proceeds
from principal repayments and maturities of securities
available-for-sale to fund our operations and to repay
borrowings. The average rate paid on borrowings increased
40 basis points to 3.97% for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from 3.57% for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income
increased $405,000, or 1.1%, to $36.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, from $36.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Our net interest margin
increased six basis points to 2.87% for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from 2.81% for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The margin for the year ended
December 31, 2007, included net interest income earned on
stock subscription proceeds held in escrow at the Northfield
Bank until the stock offering was completed. Average
interest-earning assets decreased by $12.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the prior year
due primarily to the sale of two branch locations and related
deposit liabilities in the first quarter of 2007, and pay-downs
of mortgage-backed securities, partially offset by subscription
proceeds received.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a
provision for loan losses of $1.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, and $235,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. We had charge-offs of $836,000 and $0
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The allowance for loans losses was
$5.6 million, or 1.33% of total loans receivable at
December 31, 2007, compared to $5.0 million, or 1.23%
of total loans receivable at December 31, 2006. The
increase in the provision for loan losses was primarily
attributable to increases in loss reserves on impaired loans
related to declines in estimated fair values of real estate
securing these loans, as well as an increase in loan loss
factors utilized in the calculation of loan loss reserves for
commercial real estate, land, and construction loans to reflect
general deterioration in economic conditions and real estate
values in our market place.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income
increased $4.9 million or 106.0%, to $9.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, from $4.6 million
for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was
primarily attributable to the gain on sale of two branch offices
and associated deposit relationships in March 2007, which
resulted in our recognizing a gain of approximately
$4.3 million. Non-interest income was also positively
impacted by an increase in income on bank owned life insurance
of $463,000. Income on bank owned life insurance increased due
to the purchase of $7.0 million of new policies during the
first quarter of 2007.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense
increased $12.1 million, or 50.9%, to $36.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007, from
$23.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
This increase was primarily attributable to the contribution of
shares of our common stock and cash with a value of
$12.0 million to the Northfield Bank Foundation during the
fourth quarter of 2007. Compensation and employee benefits
decreased by $766,000 to $12.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from $13.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily related
to a $1.6 million charge related to a supplemental
retirement agreement entered into by the Company with its former
president, during the third quarter of 2006, partially offset by
annual merit and cost of living increases as well as increased
staff in the lending and compliance departments. Other expenses
increased $728,000 to $3.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, from $3.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. This increase is attributable to
increases in advertising and employee training.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded a
benefit for income taxes of $1.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as compared to a provision of
$6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
decline in income tax expense related to a decrease in pre-tax
income, as well as our reversal of $4.5 million in state
and local income tax liabilities, net of federal taxes. The
Company concluded an audit by the State of New York with respect
to the Companys combined state tax returns for years 2000
through 2006.
51
Average
Balances and Yields.
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average
yields and costs, and certain other information for the years
indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made,
as we had no tax-free interest-earning assets during the years.
All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual
loans were included in the computation of average balances. The
yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees,
discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to
interest income or interest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
503,897
|
|
|
$
|
31,617
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
423,947
|
|
|
$
|
28,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
%
|
|
$
|
407,068
|
|
|
$
|
27,522
|
|
|
|
6.76
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
844,435
|
|
|
|
38,072
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
718,279
|
|
|
|
30,576
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
799,244
|
|
|
|
32,764
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
35,977
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
45,077
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
51,883
|
|
|
|
2,397
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
11,653
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
6,486
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
9,582
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
97,223
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
92,202
|
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
30,435
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
1,493,185
|
|
|
|
75,049
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
|
|
1,285,991
|
|
|
|
65,702
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
|
|
1,298,212
|
|
|
|
64,867
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
|
|
80,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,573,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,352,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,347,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW, and money market accounts
|
|
$
|
445,382
|
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
450,212
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
$
|
436,306
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
367,806
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
464,552
|
|
|
|
20,212
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
474,313
|
|
|
|
18,797
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
813,188
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
914,764
|
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
910,619
|
|
|
|
21,934
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
277,227
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
127,926
|
|
|
|
5,073
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
|
|
|
181,296
|
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,090,415
|
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
1,042,690
|
|
|
|
28,836
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
|
|
1,091,915
|
|
|
|
28,406
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
94,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
13,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,198,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
375,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,573,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,352,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,347,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
Net interest-earning assets(2)
|
|
$
|
402,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
206,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
136.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the
weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the
weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning
assets less total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by
average total interest-earning assets. |
52
Rate/Volume
Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and
volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The
rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate
(changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column
shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in
volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents
the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table,
changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be
segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the
changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Due to
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Due to
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
4,845
|
|
|
$
|
(1,626
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,219
|
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
$
|
(252
|
)
|
|
$
|
876
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
5,608
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
7,496
|
|
|
|
(3,524
|
)
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
(2,188
|
)
|
Other securities
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(297
|
)
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
(844
|
)
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
9,347
|
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
|
|
1,677
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW and money market accounts
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(3,770
|
)
|
|
|
(3,786
|
)
|
|
|
(7,556
|
)
|
|
|
(377
|
)
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
(3,808
|
)
|
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
|
(5,241
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
(2,279
|
)
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
(1,399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(2,505
|
)
|
|
|
2,935
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
$
|
9,165
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
$
|
9,927
|
|
|
$
|
1,663
|
|
|
$
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management
of Market Risk
General. Since a majority of our assets and
liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most
significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our
assets, consisting primarily of mortgage-related assets and
loans, have longer maturities than our liabilities, consisting
primarily of deposits. As a result, a principal part of our
business strategy involves managing interest rate risk and
limiting the exposure of our net interest income to changes in
market interest rates. Accordingly, our board of directors has
established a management asset liability committee, comprised of
our Treasurer, who chairs this Committee, our Chief Executive
Officer, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, our Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer
and our Executive Vice President of Operations. This committee
is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in
our assets and liabilities, for recommending to the asset
liability management committee of our board of directors
the level of risk that is appropriate, given our business
strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and
performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent
with the guidelines approved by the board of directors.
We seek to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize
the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest
rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability management, we
currently use the following strategies to manage our interest
rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
originate commercial real estate loans and multifamily real
estate loans that generally tend to have interest rates that
reset at five years;
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
invest in shorter maturity investment grade corporate securities
and mortgage-backed securities; and
|
|
|
|
obtaining general financing through lower cost deposits and
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and repurchase agreements.
|
Net Portfolio Value Analysis. We compute the
net present value of our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (net portfolio value or
NPV) over a range of assumed market interest rates.
Our simulation model uses a discounted cash flow analysis to
measure the net portfolio value. We estimate the economic value
of these assets and liabilities under the assumption that
interest rates experience an instantaneous, parallel, and
sustained increase or decrease of 100 and 200 basis points.
A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and
100 basis points equals one percent. An increase in
interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a
100 basis point increase in the Change in Interest
Rates column below.
Net Interest Income Analysis. We also analyze
our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through our net
interest income model. Net interest income is the difference
between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning
assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest we pay on
our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and
borrowings. We estimate what our net interest income would be
for a twelve-month period. We then calculate what the net
interest income would be for the same period under the
assumption that interest rates experience an instantaneous and
sustained increase of 100, 200, or 300 basis points or a
decrease of 100 and 200 which is based on the current interest
rate environment.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2008, our
calculation of the estimated changes in our net portfolio value,
net present value ratio, and percent change in net interest
income that would result from the designated instantaneous and
sustained changes in interest rates. Computations of prospective
effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market
interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and should
not be relied on as indicative of actual results (dollars in
thousands.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV(2)
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Present
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
NPV/Present
|
|
Net Interest
|
Interest
Rates(1)
|
|
Value of
|
|
Value of
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Change In
|
|
Value
|
|
Income Percent
|
(Basis Points)
|
|
Assets
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
NPV
|
|
NPV
|
|
of Assets Ratio
|
|
Change
|
|
|
+300
|
|
|
$
|
1,648,127
|
|
|
$
|
1,286,149
|
|
|
$
|
361,978
|
|
|
$
|
(81,791
|
)
|
|
|
21.96
|
%
|
|
|
(2.68
|
)%
|
|
+200
|
|
|
|
1,695,983
|
|
|
|
1,307,131
|
|
|
|
388,852
|
|
|
|
(54,917
|
)
|
|
|
22.93
|
%
|
|
|
(0.63
|
)%
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
1,746,926
|
|
|
|
1,328,839
|
|
|
|
418,087
|
|
|
|
(25,682
|
)
|
|
|
23.93
|
%
|
|
|
(0.16
|
)%
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,795,077
|
|
|
|
1,351,308
|
|
|
|
443,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
−100
|
|
|
|
1,818,978
|
|
|
|
1,372,387
|
|
|
|
446,591
|
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
24.55
|
%
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
−200
|
|
|
|
1,833,920
|
|
|
|
1,393,041
|
|
|
|
440,879
|
|
|
|
(2,890
|
)
|
|
|
24.04
|
%
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes an instantaneous and sustained uniform change in
interest rates at all maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
NPV includes non-interest earning assets and liabilities. |
The table above indicates that at December 31, 2008, in the
event of a 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we
would experience a 0.65% decrease in estimated net portfolio
value and an 4.63% increase in net interest income. In the event
of a 300 basis point increase in interest rates, we would
experience an 18.43% decrease in net portfolio value and a 2.68%
decrease in net interest income. Our policies provide that, in
the event of a 200 basis point increase/decrease or less in
interest rates, our net present value ratio should decrease by
no more than 400 basis points and our projected net
interest income should decrease by no more than 20%.
Additionally, our policy states that our net portfolio value
should be at least 8.5% of total assets before and after such
shock at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008, we
were in compliance with all board approved policies with respect
to interest rate risk management.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in
determining interest rate risk through changes in net portfolio
value and net interest income. Our model requires us to make
certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in
which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market
interest
54
rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value and net interest
income information presented assume that the composition of our
interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the
beginning of a period remains constant over the period being
measured and assume that a particular change in interest rates
is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the
duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities.
Accordingly, although interest rate risk calculations provide an
indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular
point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not
provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market
interest rates on our net interest income and will differ from
actual results.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to fund assets and meet obligations as
they come due. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit
inflows, loan repayments, borrowings through repurchase
agreements and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York, and repayments, maturities and sales of securities. In
addition, we have the ability to borrow through repurchase
agreements in wholesale markets. While maturities and scheduled
amortization of loans and securities are fairly predictable
sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are
greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic
conditions, and competition. Our Board Asset and Liability
Committee is responsible for establishing and monitoring our
liquidity targets and strategies in order to ensure that
sufficient liquidity exists for meeting the borrowing needs and
deposit withdrawals of our customers as well as unanticipated
contingencies. We seek to maintain a ratio of liquid assets (not
subject to pledge) as a percentage of deposits and borrowings
(not subject to pledge) of 35% or greater. At December 31,
2008, this ratio was 74.51%. We believe that we had enough
sources of liquidity to satisfy our short- and long-term
liquidity needs as of December 31, 2008.
We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon
our assessment of:
|
|
|
|
|
expected loan demand;
|
|
|
|
expected deposit flows;
|
|
|
|
yields available on interest-earning deposits and
securities; and
|
|
|
|
the objectives of our asset/liability management program.
|
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, and
unpledged mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by the
U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, that we can
either borrow against or sell. We also have the ability to
redeem certificates of deposit in other financial institutions,
which would however subject us to certain early redemption
penalties. We also have the ability to surrender bank owned life
insurance contracts. The surrender of these contracts would
subject the Company to income taxes and penalties for increases
in the cash surrender values over the original premium payments.
The Company had the following primary sources of liquidity at
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
50,128
|
|
Unpledged mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
456,571
|
|
(Issued or Guaranteed By the
U.S. Government, Fannie Mae
or, Freddie Mac)
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit in other financial institutions
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
At December 31, 2008, we had $44.0 million in
outstanding loan commitments. In addition, we had
$36.2 million in unused lines of credit to borrowers.
Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31,
2008 totaled $377.9 million, or 36.9% of total deposits. If
these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to
seek other sources of funds, including loan sales, other deposit
products, including replacement certificates of deposit,
securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements), and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York and other borrowing sources. Depending on market
conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such
deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the
certificates of deposit due on or before December 31, 2009.
We believe, based on past
55
experience, that a significant portion of such deposits will
remain with us, and we have the ability to attract and retain
deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.
The Company has a detailed contingency funding plan that is
reviewed and reported to the board asset liability committee on
at least a quarterly basis. This plan includes monitoring cash
on a daily basis to determine the liquidity needs of the Bank.
Additionally, Management stress tests the Banks retail
deposits and wholesale funding sources in several scenarios on a
quarterly basis. The stress scenarios include deposit run-off of
up to 50% and sale of our securities available-for- sale
portfolio at a discount of 10% to its current estimated fair
value. The Bank continues to maintain significant liquidity
under all stress scenarios.
Northfield Bank is subject to various regulatory capital
requirements, including a risk-based capital measure. The
risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of
capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by
assigning assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk
categories. At December 31, 2008, Northfield Bank exceeded
all regulatory capital requirements. Northfield Bank is
considered well capitalized under regulatory
guidelines. See Supervision and Regulation
Federal Banking Regulation Capital
Requirements and Note 11 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual
Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider,
we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit
and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations
represent our potential future cash requirements, a significant
portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being
drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit
policies and approval process applicable to loans we originate.
In addition, we routinely enter into commitments to sell
mortgage loans; such amounts are not significant to our
operations. For additional information, see Note 10 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary
course of our operations we enter into certain contractual
obligations. Such obligations include leases for premises and
equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit
liabilities, and agreements with respect to investments.
The following table summarizes our significant fixed and
determinable contractual obligations and other funding needs by
payment date at December 31, 2008. The payment amounts
represent those amounts due to the recipient and do not include
any unamortized premiums or discounts or other similar carrying
amount adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
One to
|
|
|
Three to Five
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
110,223
|
|
|
$
|
95,000
|
|
|
$
|
121,300
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
331,523
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
3,801
|
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
23,652
|
|
|
|
32,948
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
786
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
377,854
|
|
|
|
32,967
|
|
|
|
6,760
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
417,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
490,444
|
|
|
$
|
132,511
|
|
|
$
|
125,949
|
|
|
$
|
25,220
|
|
|
$
|
785,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
80,628
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances, repurchase
agreements and accrued interest payable at December 31,
2008. |
Impact of
Recent Accounting Standards and Interpretations
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements, SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB
56
Staff Position
157-1,
Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease
Classification or Measurement under Statement 13
(FSP 157-1)
and
FSP 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2).
FSP 157-1
amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing
transactions from its scope.
FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for
items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. These nonfinancial
items include assets and liabilities such as reporting units
measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and
nonfinancial assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination. The provisions of Statement No. 157
were adopted by the Company, as it applies to its financial
instruments, effective beginning January 1, 2008. The
impact of adoption of SFAS No. 157 is discussed in
Note 13 of the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The
standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective
is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The Company
adopted the statement effective January 1, 2008. The
adoption of Statement No. 159 did not have a material
impact on the Companys financial statements as the Company
did not choose to measure any additional financial instruments
or certain other items at fair value.
In June 2008,
EITF 03-6-1
Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method
under FASB Statement No. 128 was issued which
addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and,
therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in
computing earnings per share. The Statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of
EITF 03-6-1
is not expected to have a material affect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP
FAS 157-3).
FSP
FAS 157-3
clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in an
inactive market environment and provides an example which
illustrates key considerations in determining the fair value of
a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is
not active. The FSP allows for the use of an entitys own
assumptions about future cash flows with appropriately
risk-adjusted discount rates to estimate fair value when
relevant observable inputs are not available. The FSP does not
change the principles established by SFAS No. 157 and
is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. We adopted FSP
FAS 157-3
as of September 30, 2008 with no material impact to our
consolidated financial statements.
Impact of
Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes have
been prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP generally requires
the measurement of financial position and operating results in
terms of historical dollars without consideration for changes in
the relative purchasing power of money over time due to
inflation. The effect of inflation is reflected in the increased
cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets
and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result,
changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on our
performance than the effects of inflation.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For information regarding market risk see
Item 7-
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations Management of
Market Risk.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
57
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)), and our
report dated March 16, 2009, expressed an
unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
Short Hills, New Jersey
March 16, 2009
58
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Northfield Bancorp, Inc, and subsidiaries
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Northfield Bancorp, Inc and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and our
report dated March 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Short Hills, New Jersey
March 16, 2009
59
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
9,014
|
|
|
|
7,277
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
41,114
|
|
|
|
17,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
Securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value
(encumbered $183,711 in 2008 and $26,603 in 2007)
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
802,417
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (estimated fair
value of $14,588 and $19,440 in 2008 and 2007, respectively)
(encumbered $1,241 in 2008 and $0 in 2007)
|
|
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
19,686
|
|
Loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
|
|
424,329
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
(5,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
8,319
|
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
42,001
|
|
|
|
41,560
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
6,702
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
8,899
|
|
|
|
7,727
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
16,159
|
|
|
|
16,159
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
14,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
877,225
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
162,084
|
|
|
|
104,420
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
|
|
17,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,371,183
|
|
|
|
1,019,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 90,000,000 shares
authorized, 44,803,061 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
199,453
|
|
|
|
199,395
|
|
Unallocated common stock held by employee stock ownership plan
|
|
|
(16,391
|
)
|
|
|
(16,977
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
203,085
|
|
|
|
187,992
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(3,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
60
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
31,617
|
|
|
|
28,398
|
|
|
|
27,522
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
38,072
|
|
|
|
30,576
|
|
|
|
32,764
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
2,397
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York dividends
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
Deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
75,049
|
|
|
|
65,702
|
|
|
|
64,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
|
|
21,934
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
5,073
|
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
28,836
|
|
|
|
28,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
36,866
|
|
|
|
36,461
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
35,424
|
|
|
|
36,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges for customer services
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
Income on bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
(Loss) gain on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
(1,318
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment and deposit relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
11,723
|
|
|
|
12,685
|
|
|
|
13,451
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
3,864
|
|
|
|
3,062
|
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
Contribution to Northfield Bank Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
3,756
|
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
24,852
|
|
|
|
35,950
|
|
|
|
23,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
17,008
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share(1)
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
|
|
43,076,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share is calculated for the period that the
Companys shares of common stock were outstanding
(November 8, 2007 through December 31, 2007). The net
loss for this period was $1,501,000 and the weighted average
common shares outstanding were 43,076,586. Per share data and
shares outstanding information is not applicable prior to
November 8, 2007. |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
61
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Held by the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Employee Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
(Loss) Income,
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Ownership Plan
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,889
|
|
|
|
(15,640
|
)
|
|
|
151,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
year (net of tax of $1,042)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
(net of tax of $24)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption SFAS 158 (net of tax of $116)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,731
|
|
|
|
(14,247
|
)
|
|
|
163,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
year (net of tax of $7,069)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,897
|
|
|
|
10,897
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
(net of tax of $4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Net actuarial loss on other postretirement benefits arising
during year (net of tax of $145)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for net actuarial loss included in
net income (net of tax of $7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for service cost included in net
income (net of tax of $6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Sale of 19,265,316 shares of common stock, issuance of
24,641,584 shares to the mutual holding company, and
issuance of 896,061 shares to Northfield Bank Foundation
|
|
|
44,802,961
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
198,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,552
|
|
Purchase of common stock by the ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
44,803,061
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
199,395
|
|
|
|
(16,977
|
)
|
|
|
187,992
|
|
|
|
(3,518
|
)
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
year (net of tax of $2,434)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
(net of tax of $6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Net actuarial loss on other postretirement benefits arising
during year (net of tax of $12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net actuarial loss included in
net income (net of tax of $9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for service cost included in net
income (net of tax of $7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.04 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
44,803,061
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
199,453
|
|
|
|
(16,391
|
)
|
|
|
203,085
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
62
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
(Accretion) amortization of premium and discounts on securities,
and deferred loan fees and costs
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
781
|
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Income on bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(4,235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,694
|
)
|
|
|
(1,231
|
)
|
Contribution of common stock to Northfield Bank Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of loans
|
|
|
4,092
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
Origination of mortgage loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
(3,793
|
)
|
|
|
(6,350
|
)
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
Gain on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
Gain on sale of deposit relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(5,283
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
ESOP expense
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10,396
|
)
|
|
|
(526
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
5,443
|
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
11,412
|
|
|
|
10,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans receivable
|
|
|
(163,643
|
)
|
|
|
(16,029
|
)
|
|
|
(21,269
|
)
|
(Purchases) redemptions of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
stock, net
|
|
|
(2,708
|
)
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
4,343
|
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(421,696
|
)
|
|
|
(309,396
|
)
|
|
|
(40,532
|
)
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
270,091
|
|
|
|
234,457
|
|
|
|
171,774
|
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
8,668
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
20,100
|
|
Purchases of certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(118,653
|
)
|
|
|
(50,500
|
)
|
|
|
(10,210
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of certificates of deposit
|
|
|
89,500
|
|
|
|
31,200
|
|
|
|
5,220
|
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from bank owned life insurance contracts
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to premises and equipment
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(1,115
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(337,413
|
)
|
|
|
(106,027
|
)
|
|
|
136,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits
|
|
|
147,214
|
|
|
|
(3,560
|
)
|
|
|
(20,357
|
)
|
Deposit relationship sold, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,985
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock for ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in advance payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Repayments under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
other borrowings
|
|
|
410,800
|
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Repayments related to securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and other borrowings
|
|
|
(203,000
|
)
|
|
|
(87,000
|
)
|
|
|
(110,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
357,120
|
|
|
|
59,079
|
|
|
|
(125,508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
25,040
|
|
|
|
(35,536
|
)
|
|
|
22,256
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
60,624
|
|
|
|
38,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
60,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
27,322
|
|
|
|
28,657
|
|
|
|
28,809
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
11,316
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
8,760
|
|
Transfer of premises and equipment to held-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
749
|
|
Deposits utilized to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
63
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
|
|
(1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The following significant accounting and reporting policies of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company), conform to U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or (GAAP), and are used in preparing and
presenting these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(a)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the
accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries,
Northfield Investment, Inc. and Northfield Bank (the
Bank) and the Banks wholly-owned significant
subsidiaries, NSB Services Corp. and NSB Realty Trust. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
In 1995, the Bank completed a Plan of Mutual Holding Company
Reorganization, utilizing a single-tier mutual holding company
structure. In a series of steps, the Bank formed a New
York-chartered mutual holding company (NSB Holding Corp.) which
owned 100% of the common stock of the Bank. In 2002, NSB Holding
Corp. formed Northfield Holdings Corp., a New York-chartered
stock corporation, and contributed 100% of the common stock of
the Bank into Northfield Holdings Corp. which owned 100% of the
common stock of Northfield Holdings Corp. In 2006, Northfield
Holdings Corp.s name was changed to Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. and Northfield Savings Bank name was changed to Northfield
Bank. In 2007, NSB Holdings Corp. name was changed to Northfield
Bancorp, MHC.
As part of the stock issuance plan announced in April 2007,
Northfield Bank converted to a federally-charted savings bank
from a New York-chartered savings bank effective
November 6, 2007. Northfield Banks primary federal
regulator is the Office of Thrift Supervision (the
OTS) and was the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the FDIC) prior to our November 2007
conversion. Simultaneously with Northfield Banks
conversion, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
converted to federal-chartered holding companies from New
York-chartered holding companies.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management
is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
balance sheets and revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results may differ significantly from those
estimates and assumptions. A material estimate that is
particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term
is the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the
determination of this allowance, management generally obtains
independent appraisals for significant properties. Judgments
related to goodwill, and securities valuation and impairment are
also critical because they involve a higher degree of complexity
and subjectivity and require estimates and assumptions about
highly uncertain matters. Actual results may differ from the
estimates and assumptions.
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation. In addition, the Company
determined that $82 million of Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York borrowings classified as securities sold under
agreement to repurchase in 2007 should be classifed as Federal
Home Loan Bank advances and included in other borrowings.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank,
provides a full range of banking services primarily to
individuals and corporate customers in Richmond and Kings
Counties, in New York, and Union and Middlesex Counties, in New
Jersey. The Company is subject to competition from other
financial institutions and to the regulations of certain federal
and state agencies, and undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
64
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, due from banks,
federal funds sold, and interest-bearing deposits in other
financial institutions with an original term of three months or
less. Certificates of deposit with original maturities of
greater than three months are excluded from cash equivalents and
reported as a separate line item on the consolidated balance
sheets.
Securities are classified at the time of purchase, based on
managements intention, as securities held-to-maturity,
securities available-for-sale, or trading account securities.
Securities held-to-maturity are those that management has the
positive intent and ability to hold until maturity. Securities
held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost, adjusted for
amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the
level-yield method over the contractual term of the securities,
adjusted for actual prepayments. Trading securities are
securities that are bought and may be held for the purpose of
selling them in the near term. Trading securities are reported
at estimated fair value, with unrealized holding gains and
losses reported as a component of (loss) gain on securities
transactions, net in non-interest income. Securities
available-for-sale represents all securities not classified as
either held-to-maturity or trading. Securities
available-for-sale are carried at estimated fair value with
unrealized holding gains and losses (net of related tax effects)
on such securities excluded from earnings, but included as a
separate component of stockholders equity, titled
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. The
cost of securities sold is determined using the
specific-identification method. Security transactions are
recorded on a trade-date basis. A periodic review and evaluation
of the securities held-to-maturity and securities
available-for-sale is conducted to determine if the estimated
fair value of any security has declined below its carrying value
and whether such impairment is other-than-temporary. If such
decline is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the security is
written down to a new cost basis and the resulting loss charged
to earnings. The estimated fair value of debt securities,
including mortgage-backed securities and corporate debt
obligations is furnished by an independent third party pricing
service. The third party pricing service primarily utilizes
pricing models and methodologies that incorporate observable
market inputs including among other things benchmark yields,
reported trades, and projected prepayment and default rates.
Management reviews the data and assumptions used in pricing the
securities by its third party provider for reasonableness.
Net loans held-for-investment, are stated at unpaid principal
balance, adjusted by unamortized premiums and unearned
discounts, deferred origination fees and certain direct
origination costs, and the allowance for loan losses. Interest
income on loans is accrued and credited to income as earned. Net
loan origination fees/costs are deferred and accreted/amortized
to interest income over the loans contractual life using
the level-yield method, adjusted for actual prepayments. Loans
held-for-sale are designated at time of origination and
generally consist of fixed rate residential loans with terms of
15 years or more and are recorded at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value in the aggregate. Gains are recognized on a
settlement-date basis and are determined by the difference
between the net sales proceeds and the carrying value of the
loans, including any net deferred fees or costs.
The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is
probable, based on current information, that the Company will
not collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loan agreement. Homogeneous loans collectively
evaluated for impairment, such as smaller balance loans are
excluded from the impaired loan portfolio. The Company has
defined the population of impaired loans to be all non-accrual
loans with an outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater.
Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that the
loans carrying value is not in excess of the estimated
fair value of the loan, or the underlying collateral (less
estimated costs to sell) if the loan is collateral dependent. If
the estimated fair
65
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
value of the loan is below the carrying value, the Company
provides a specific valuation allowance, which is included in
the allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for
loan losses charged against income and is decreased by
charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loan losses are charged-off in
the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed
uncollectible. Generally, the Company will record a loan
charge-off (including partial charge-off) to reduce a loan to
the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost
to sell, if it is determined that it is probable that recovery
will come primarily from the sale of such collateral. The
provision for loan losses is based on managements
evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance which considers,
among other things, the estimated fair value of impaired loans,
past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the
portfolio, existing adverse situations that may affect the
borrowers ability to repay, estimated value of any
underlying collateral, changes if any, in: underwriting
standards; collection; charge-off and recovery practices; the
nature or volume of the portfolio; lending staff; concentration
of loans; as well as current economic conditions; and other
relevant factors. Management believes the allowance for loan
losses is adequate to provide for probable and reasonably
estimatable losses at the date of the consolidated balance
sheets. The Company also maintains an allowance for estimated
losses on off-balance sheet credit risks related to loan
commitments and standby letters of credit. Management utilizes a
methodology similar to its allowance for loan loss adequacy
methodology to estimate losses on these commitments. The
allowance for estimated credit losses on off-balance sheet
commitments is included in other liabilities and any changes to
the allowance are recorded as a component of other non-interest
expense.
While management uses available information to recognize
probable and reasonably estimatable losses on loans, future
additions may be necessary based on changes in conditions,
including changes in economic conditions, particularly in
Richmond and Kings Counties in New York, and Union and Middlesex
Counties in New Jersey. Accordingly, as with most financial
institutions in the market area, the ultimate collectibility of
a substantial portion of the Companys loan portfolio is
susceptible to changes in conditions in the Companys
marketplace. In addition, future changes in laws and regulations
could make it more difficult for the Company to collect all
contractual amounts due on its loans and mortgage-backed
securities.
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of
their examination process, periodically review the
Companys allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may
require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance
based on their judgments about information available to them at
the time of their examination.
Troubled Debt Restructured loans are those loans whose terms
have been modified, because of deterioration in the financial
condition of the borrower. Modifications could include extension
of the terms of the loan: reduced interest rates, forgiveness of
accrued interest
and/or
principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of
such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured
until paid in full or, if the obligation yields a market rate (a
rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing
to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with
comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which
the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has
performed under the modified terms for a six-month period. The
Company records an impairment charge equal to the difference
between the present value of estimated future cash flows under
the restructured terms discounted at the original loans
effective interest rate, and the original loans carrying value.
A loan is considered past due when it is not paid in accordance
with its contractual terms. The accrual of income on loans,
including impaired loans, and other loans in the process of
foreclosure, is generally discontinued when a loan becomes
90 days or more delinquent, or when certain factors that
the ultimate collection of principal and interest is in doubt.
Loans on which the accrual of income has been discontinued are
designated as non-accrual loans. All previously accrued interest
is reversed against interest income and income is recognized
subsequently only in the period that cash is received, provided
no principal payments are due and the remaining principal
balance outstanding is deemed collectible. A non-accrual loan is
not returned
66
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
to accrual status until both principal and interest payments are
brought current and factors indicating doubtful collection no
longer exist, including performance by the borrower under the
loan terms for a six-month period.
|
|
(f)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
|
The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
(the FHLB), is required to hold shares of capital
stock in the FHLB as a condition to both becoming a member and
engaging in certain transactions with the FHLB. The minimum
investment requirement is determined by a membership
investment component and an activity-based
investment component. The membership investment component is the
greater of 0.20% of the Banks Mortgage-related Assets, as
defined by the FHLB, or $1,000. The activity-based investment
component is equal to 4.5% of the Banks outstanding
advances with the FHLB. The activity-based investment component
also considers other transactions, including assets originated
for or sold to the FHLB and delivery commitments issued by the
FHLB. The Company currently does not enter into these other
types of transactions with the FHLB.
|
|
(g)
|
Premises
and Equipment, Net
|
Premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are
carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment,
including capital leases, are computed on a straight-line basis
over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The
estimated useful lives of significant classes of assets are
generally as follows: buildings forty years;
furniture and equipment five to seven years; and
purchased computer software three years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the term of the
related lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
Major improvements are capitalized, while repairs and
maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon
retirement or sale, any gain or loss is credited or charged to
operations.
|
|
(h)
|
Bank
Owned Life Insurance
|
The Company has purchased bank owned life insurance contracts in
consideration of its obligations for certain employee benefit
costs. The Companys investment in such insurance contracts
has been reported in the consolidated balance sheets at their
cash surrender values. Changes in cash surrender values and
death benefit proceeds received in excess of the related cash
surrender values are recorded as non-interest income.
Goodwill is presumed to have an indefinite useful life and is
not amortized, but rather is tested, at least annually, for
impairment at the reporting unit level. For purposes of the
Companys goodwill impairment testing, management has
identified a single reporting unit. The Company uses the quoted
market price of its common stock on the impairment testing date
as the basis for estimating the fair value of the Companys
reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds
its carrying amount, further evaluation is not necessary.
However, if the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
its carrying amount, further evaluation is required to compare
the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill to
its carrying amount to determine if a write-down of goodwill is
required. As of December 31, 2008, the carrying value of
goodwill totaled $16.2 million. The Company performed its
annual goodwill impairment test, as of December 31, 2008,
and determined the fair value of the Companys one
reporting unit to be in excess of its carrying value.
Accordingly, as of the annual impairment test date, there was no
indication of goodwill impairment. The Company will test
goodwill for impairment between annual test if an event occurs
or circumstances change that would indicate the fair value of
the reporting unit is below its carrying amount. No events have
occurred and no circumstances have changed since the annual
impairment test date that would indicate the fair value of the
reporting unit is below its carrying amount.
67
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply in the year in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Where
applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes- an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, or FIN 48, which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance
on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties,
accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. There
was no change to the net amount of assets and liabilities
recognized in the balance sheet as a result of our adoption of
FIN 48.
|
|
(k)
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to future undiscounted (and without interest) net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets
are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized
is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
(l)
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other
Borrowings
|
The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to
repurchase (Repurchase Agreements) and collateral pledge
agreements (Pledge Agreements) with selected dealers and banks.
Such agreements are accounted for as secured financing
transactions since the Company maintains effective control over
the transferred or pledged securities and the transfer meets the
other criteria for such accounting. Obligations under these
agreements are reflected as a liability in the consolidated
balance sheets. Securities underlying the agreements are
maintained at selected dealers and banks as collateral for each
transaction executed and may be sold or pledged by the
counterparty. Collateral underlying Repurchase Agreements which
permit the counterparty to sell or pledge the underlying
collateral is disclosed on the consolidated balance sheets as
encumbered. The Company retains the right under all
Repurchase Agreements and Pledge Agreements to substitute
acceptable collateral throughout the terms of the agreement.
Comprehensive income includes net income and the change in
unrealized holding gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale, change in actuarial gains and losses on
other post retirement benefits, and change in service cost on
other postretirement benefits, net of taxes. Comprehensive
income is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders Equity.
68
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company sponsors a defined postretirement benefit plan that
provides for medical and life insurance coverage to certain
retirees, as well as life insurance to all qualifying employees
of the Company. The estimated cost of postretirement benefits
earned is accrued during the individuals estimated service
period to the Company. The Company records compensation expense
related to the ESOP at an amount equal to the shares allocated
by the ESOP multiplied by the average fair value of our common
stock during the reporting period. The difference between the
fair value of shares for the period and the cost of the shares
allocated by the ESOP is recorded as an adjustment to additional
paid-in capital.
As a community-focused financial institution, substantially all
of the Companys operations involve the delivery of loan
and deposit products to customers. Management makes operating
decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of
these community banking operations, which constitute the
Companys only operating segment for financial reporting
purposes.
|
|
(p)
|
Net
Income (Loss) per Share
|
Net income per share is computed for the year ended
December 31, 2008, by dividing the net income available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. The weighted average common shares
outstanding includes the average number of shares of common
stock outstanding, including shares held by Northfield Bancorp
Inc., MHC and allocated or committed to be released Employee
Stock Ownership Plan shares.
Net loss per share is computed for the period that the common
stock was outstanding in 2007 (November 8, 2007, to
December 31, 2007,) by dividing the net loss available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding for the period from November 8, 2007, to
December 31, 2007. The weighted average common shares
outstanding includes the average number of shares of common
stock outstanding, including shares held by Northfield Bancorp
Inc., MHC and allocated or committed to be released Employee
Stock Ownership Plan shares.
Diluted earnings per share is computed using the same method as
basic earnings per share, but reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if stock options were exercised and converted
into common stock. These potentially dilutive shares would then
be included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding
for the period using the treasury stock method. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, no dilutive securities were
outstanding.
|
|
(q)
|
Other
Real Estate Owned
|
Assets acquired through or
deed-in-lieu
of loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded
at estimated fair value less estimated selling costs when
acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Costs after
acquisition are generally expensed. If the estimated fair value
of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through expense.
The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and
may be adjusted in the future because of changes in economic
conditions. Foreclosed assets, consisting entirely of other real
estate owned, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
totaled $1.1 million at December 31, 2008. There were
no foreclosed assets at December 31, 2007.
The Company completed its initial public stock offering on
November 7, 2007. The Company sold 19,265,316 shares,
or 43.0% of its outstanding common stock, to subscribers in the
offering, including 1,756,279 shares purchased by the
Northfield Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(ESOP). Northfield
69
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Bancorp, MHC, the Companys federally chartered mutual
holding company parent holds 24,641,684 shares, or 55.0% of
the Companys outstanding common stock. Additionally, the
Company contributed $3.0 million in cash, and issued
896,061 shares of common stock, or 2.0% of the
Companys outstanding common stock to the Northfield Bank
Charitable Foundation. The Northfield Bank Charitable Foundation
purchased the common stock for $8,961. This action resulted in a
$12.0 million pre-tax expense recorded in the quarter ended
December 31, 2007. Proceeds from the offering, including
the value of shares issued to the charitable foundation but net
of expenses, were $198.6 million. The Company contributed
$94.8 million of the proceeds to Northfield Bank.
|
|
(2)
|
Securities
Available-for-Sale
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed
securities and other securities available-for- sale at
December 31, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored enterprises (GSE)
|
|
$
|
532,870
|
|
|
|
13,457
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
546,244
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
9,621
|
|
|
|
55,778
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
242,557
|
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
245,492
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
90,446
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
|
83,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930,913
|
|
|
|
17,380
|
|
|
|
17,084
|
|
|
|
931,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments- Money market mutual fund
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,344
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
26,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
957,257
|
|
|
|
17,482
|
|
|
|
17,154
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored enterprises (GSE)
|
|
$
|
491,758
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
|
486,562
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
29,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
28,867
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
171,709
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
171,207
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
36,141
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728,808
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
8,309
|
|
|
|
723,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
14,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
14,012
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
65,146
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,173
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
79,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
807,981
|
|
|
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
8,324
|
|
|
|
802,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the expected maturity distribution
of debt securities available-for-sale other than mortgage-backed
securities at December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities on mortgage-backed securities will differ
from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to
call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
Certain securities available-for-sale are pledged to secure
borrowings under Pledge Agreements and Repurchase Agreements and
for other purposes required by law. At December 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007, securities available-for-sale with a
carrying value of $3,772,000 and $7,834,000, respectively, were
pledged to secure deposits. See note 7 for further
discussion regarding securities pledged for borrowings.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company had gross
proceeds of $3,350,000 on sales of securities available-for-sale
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $15,000 and $0, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, the Company had gross proceeds of
$3,705,000 on sales of securities available-for-sale with gross
realized gains and gross realized losses of approximately $9,000
and $0, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2006,
the Company had gross proceeds of $20,100,000 on sales of
securities available-for-sale with gross realized gains and
gross realized losses of approximately $60,000 and $0,
respectively.
71
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities, equity
securities, and corporate bonds available-for-sale, and the
estimated fair value of the related securities, aggregated by
security category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
7,290
|
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
17,525
|
|
|
|
9,621
|
|
|
|
24,815
|
|
REMICs GSE
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
29,267
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
18,981
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
48,248
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
|
68,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
|
68,966
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,088
|
|
|
|
110,455
|
|
|
|
7,066
|
|
|
|
37,852
|
|
|
|
17,154
|
|
|
|
148,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
6,594
|
|
|
|
338,344
|
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
|
339,186
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
28,867
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
28,867
|
|
REMICs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
21,082
|
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
91,737
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
112,819
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
21,924
|
|
|
|
8,253
|
|
|
|
461,171
|
|
|
|
8,324
|
|
|
|
483,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above available-for-sale security amounts, at
December 31, 2008, were 12 residential mortgage backed
senior class securities issued by non-GSEs with an amortized
cost of $110.7 million and an estimated fair value of
$93.8 million. Eight of these securities were purchased
prior to 2008, and had an amortized cost of $65.6 million
and estimated fair value of $65.4 million at
December 31, 2007. Management has evaluated each of these
12 securities and concluded that as of December 31, 2008,
the unrealized losses on these securities were temporary. The
securities cannot be prepaid in a manner that would result in
the Company not receiving substantially all of its amortized
cost. Management has the intent and the Company has the ability
to hold these securities until there is a market price recovery.
Each of the 12 non-GSE securities were rated AAA at
December 31, 2008, with the exception of two securities
with a total amortized cost of $17.7 million. Both of these
securities were rated investment grade at December 31,
2008. The first security, with an amortized cost of $9.5, and
estimated fair value of $5.4 million, was rated Aa2, and
the second security with an amortized cost of $8.2 million,
and estimated fair value of $5.8 million, was rated Baa3.
Management has evaluated each of the 12 securities at
December 31, 2008. Seven of the 12 securities experienced
unrealized losses of less than 10% at December 31, 2008.
These seven securities, with an amortized cost of
$58.8 million, and estimated fair value of
$55.9 million, were reviewed for key underlying
72
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
loan risk characteristics including origination dates, interest
rates levels and composition of variable and fixed rates, reset
dates (including related pricing indexes), current loan to
original collateral values, locations of collateral, delinquency
status of loans, and current credit support. These seven
securities experienced a majority of their unrealized losses in
the fourth quarter of 2008.
The remaining five residential mortgage backed securities issued
by non-GSEs at December 31, 2008, had an amortized
cost of $51.9 million, and estimated fair value of
$37.9 million, representing unrealized losses of 10% or
more of their amortized cost. In addition to reviewing the
underlying loan risk characteristics described above for
non-GSEs with realized losses of less than 10%, management also
reviewed historical and expected default rates and related
historical and expected losses on the disposal of the underlying
collateral on defaulted loans. Based on this evaluation,
management believes that it is not probable that the Company
will not receive all amounts due under the contractual terms of
the securities.
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs and
corporate bonds are investment grade securities with no apparent
credit weaknesses. The declines in value are deemed to relate to
the general interest rate environment and are considered
temporary. The securities cannot be prepaid in a manner that
would result in the Company not receiving substantially all of
its amortized cost. Management has the intent and the Company
has the ability to hold these securities until there is a market
price recovery.
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in
the future if the underlying performance of the collateral for
the collateralized mortgage obligation or other securities
deteriorate and our credit enhancement levels does not provide
sufficient protections to our contractual principal and
interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary impairments may occur in the future given
the current economic environment.
|
|
(3)
|
Securities
Held-to-Maturity
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed
securities held-to-maturity at December 31, (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
9,206
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
9,320
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
10,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
19,686
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
19,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company did not sell any held-to-maturity securities during
the three-year period ended December 31, 2008.
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities
held-to-maturity and the estimated fair value of the related
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time
that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized
loss position, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
11,313
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
11,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs are
investment grade securities with no apparent credit weaknesses.
The declines in value are deemed to relate to the general
interest rate environment and are considered temporary. The
securities cannot be prepaid in a manner that would result in
the Company not receiving substantially all of its amortized
cost. Management has the intent and the Company has the ability
to hold these securities until there is a market price recovery.
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in
the future if the underlying performance of the collateral for
the collateralized mortgage obligation or other securities
deteriorate and our credit enhancement levels does not provide
sufficient protections to our contractual principal and
interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary impairments may occur in the future given
the current economic environment.
74
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Loans held-for-investment, net, consists of the following at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
289,123
|
|
|
|
243,902
|
|
One -to- four family residential
|
|
|
103,128
|
|
|
|
95,246
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
52,158
|
|
|
|
44,850
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
108,534
|
|
|
|
14,164
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
24,182
|
|
|
|
12,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
577,125
|
|
|
|
410,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
11,397
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and industrial and other loans
|
|
|
12,364
|
|
|
|
13,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-investment
|
|
|
589,489
|
|
|
|
424,198
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment, net
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
|
|
424,329
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
(5,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment
|
|
$
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale consists of the following at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One -to- four family residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-sale
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company does not have any lending programs commonly referred
to as subprime lending. Subprime lending generally targets
borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized
by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments,
bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity
as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank, also
services first mortgage residential loans for others. The
principal balance of residential loans serviced amounted to
$77,291,000 and $80,081,000 at December 31, 2008, and 2007,
respectively. In addition, the Company serviced $250,000 in
construction loans at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Servicing of loans for others does not have a
significant affect on our financial position or results of
operations.
75
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in loans receivable are loans for which the accrual of
interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in
the financial condition of the borrowers. The principal amount
of these nonaccrual loans (including impaired loans) was
$9,502,000 and $8,606,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Loans past due ninety days or more and still
accruing interest were $137,000 and $1,228,000 at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and consisted of
loans that were considered both well-secured and in the process
of collection. The Company is under no commitment to lend
additional funds to borrowers whose loans are on a non-accrual
status or who are past due ninety days or more and still
accruing interest.
The following tables summarize impaired loans, all of which were
on non-accrual status (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
5,679
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
5,494
|
|
Trouble debt restructured
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
6,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
7,426
|
|
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
7,426
|
|
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no commitments to
lend additional funds to these borrowers. The average recorded
balance of impaired loans for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006 was approximately $6,997,000, $8,139,000,
and $1,217,000, respectively. The Company did not record any
interest income on a cash basis related to impaired loans for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
76
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(5)
|
Premises
and Equipment, Net
|
At December 31, 2008, and 2007, premises and equipment,
less accumulated depreciation and amortization, consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
At cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
11,755
|
|
|
|
9,827
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
6,376
|
|
|
|
6,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,469
|
|
|
|
21,807
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(15,570
|
)
|
|
|
(14,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
8,899
|
|
|
|
7,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006 was $1,490,000, $1,326,000, and $1,298,000,
respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a gain of approximately $648,000 as result of the
sale of premises and equipment.
Deposits account balances at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negotiable orders of withdrawal
|
|
$
|
64,382
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
|
|
57,555
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
Non-interest bearing checking
|
|
|
93,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total transaction
|
|
|
157,552
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
156,763
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
88,241
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
6,034
|
|
|
|
3.89
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
361,061
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
311,841
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total savings
|
|
|
449,302
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
317,875
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000
|
|
|
252,426
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
|
|
254,964
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
$100,000 or more
|
|
|
165,159
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
|
|
|
147,623
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit
|
|
|
417,585
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
402,587
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
877,225
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit at
December 31, 2008, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
377,854
|
|
2010
|
|
|
25,326
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7,641
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,349
|
|
2012 and after
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
417,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 is summarized as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Negotiable orders of withdrawal and money market
|
|
$
|
3,147
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Savings-passbook, statement, and tiered
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
Subscription proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
20,212
|
|
|
|
18,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
|
|
21,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other
Borrowings
|
Borrowings consisted of Securities Sold under Agreements to
Repurchase, FHLB advances, and obligations under capital leases
and are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
$
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
159,800
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
2,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
332,084
|
|
|
|
124,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances are secured by a blanket lien on unencumbered
securities and the Companys investment in FHLB capital
stock.
78
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Repurchase Agreements and FHLB advances have contractual
maturities at December 31, 2008 as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
FHLB
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
88,500
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
2010
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
2013 and after
|
|
|
16,300
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,800
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank has an overnight line of credit with the Federal Home
Loan Bank of New York for $100,000,000. Additionally, the Bank
has a line of credit for $100,000,000 from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York which permits the Bank to borrow for a term of
one month. These lines are limited to the amount of securities
available to be pledged. The Bank had no outstanding balances
under these lines at December 31, 2008. These lines expire
on July 31, 2009 and may be renewed at the option of the
FHLB. Additionally, the Company has the ability to borrow at the
Federal Reserve Bank discount window to the extent the Bank has
collateral to pledge.
Interest expense on borrowings for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 are summarized as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
6,655
|
|
|
|
3,464
|
|
|
|
5,305
|
|
FHLB over-night borrowings
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
5,073
|
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 consists of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Federal tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
6,130
|
|
|
|
8,964
|
|
|
|
6,635
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
(2,907
|
)
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,585
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
5,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
57
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
(7,489
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
(7,612
|
)
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company has recognized income tax expense related to changes
in unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale
of $2,428,000, $7,065,000, and $1,018,000, in 2008, 2007, and
2006, respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of
comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of changes
in stockholders equity.
The Company has also recognized an income tax expense (benefit)
related to net actuarial losses from other postretirement
benefits of $51,000, $(132,000) and $(116,000) in 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of
accumulated comprehensive income in the consolidated statements
of changes in stockholders equity.
Reconciliation between the amount of reported total income tax
expense and the amount computed by multiplying the applicable
statutory income tax rate for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Tax expense at statutory rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
8,054
|
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
5,953
|
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax, net of federal income tax
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(4,947
|
)
|
|
|
259
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
Change in state apportionment, net of federal tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization of State of New York net operating loss
carryforwards, net of federal tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
Charitable deduction carryforward
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
4,339
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
Unrealized actuarial losses on post retirement benefits
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
Unrealized loss on securities AFS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
Straight-line leases adjustment
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Federal benefit on state income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
Reserve for accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Reserve for loan commitments
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Other
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
12,141
|
|
|
|
14,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities AFS
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired loans
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired investment
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Other
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
9,657
|
|
|
|
12,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has determined that a valuation allowance should be
established for certain state and local tax benefits related to
the Companys contribution to the Northfield Bank
Foundation. The Company has determined that it is not required
to establish a valuation reserve for the remaining net deferred
tax asset account since it is more likely than not
that the net deferred tax assets will be realized through future
reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future
taxable income and tax planning strategies. The conclusion that
it is more likely than not that the remaining net
deferred tax assets will be realized is based on the history of
earnings and the prospects for continued profitability.
Management will continue to review the tax criteria related to
the recognition of deferred tax assets.
Certain amendments to the Federal, New York State, and New York
City tax laws regarding bad debt deductions were enacted in July
1996, August 1996, and March 1997, respectively. The Federal
amendments include elimination of the
percentage-of-taxable-income method for tax years beginning
after December 31,
81
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
1995 and imposition of a requirement to recapture into taxable
income (over a six-year period) the bad debt reserves in excess
of the base-year amounts. The New York State and City amendments
redesignated the Companys state and city bad debt reserves
at December 31, 1995 as the base-year amount and also
provided for future additions to the base-year reserve using the
percentage-of-taxable-income method.
The Companys Federal, state, and city base-year reserves
were approximately $5,900,000, respectively, at
December 31, 2008 and 2007. Under the tax laws as amended,
events that would result in taxation of certain of these
reserves include the following: (a) the Companys
retained earnings represented by this reserve are used for
purposes other than to absorb losses from bad debts, including
excess dividends or distributions in liquidation; (b) the
Company redeems its stock; (c) the Company fails to meet
the definition of a bank for Federal purposes or a thrift for
state and city purposes; or (d) there is a change in the
federal, state, or city tax laws. At December 31, 2005, the
Companys unrecognized deferred tax liabilities with
respect to its base-year reserves for Federal, state, and city
taxes totaled approximately $2,800,000. Deferred tax liabilities
have not been recognized with respect to the 1987 base-year
reserves, since the Company does not expect that these amounts
will become taxable in the foreseeable future.
At December 31, 2005, the Company did not meet the
definition of a thrift for New York State and City purposes, and
as a result, recorded a state and local tax expense of
approximately $2,200,000 pertaining to the recapture of the
state and city base-year reserves accumulated after
December 31, 1987.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States
federal jurisdiction and in New York State and City
jurisdictions. The Companys subsidiary also files income
tax returns in the State of New Jersey. With few exceptions, the
Company is no longer subject to federal and local income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2004. The
State of New York has concluded examining the Companys tax
returns filed from 2000 to 2006, resulting in the Company
reversing of state and local tax liabilities of approximately
$4.5 million, net of federal taxes during 2007.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007. The amounts have not been
reduced by the federal deferred tax effects of unrecognized
state benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
2,259
|
|
Additions of positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
Settlement of unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
(2,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records interest accrued related to uncertain tax
benefits as tax expense. During the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company accrued $62,000 and
$350,000, respectively, in interest on uncertain tax positions.
The Company records penalties accrued as other expenses. The
Company has not incurred any tax penalties.
The Company has a 401(k) plan for its employees, which grants
eligible employees (those salaried employees with at least one
year of service) the opportunity to invest from 2% to 15% of
their base compensation in certain investment alternatives. The
Company contributes an amount equal to one-quarter of employee
contributions up to the first 6% of base compensation
contributed by eligible employees for the first three years of
participation. Subsequent years of participation in excess of
three years will increase the Company matching contribution from
25% to 50% of an employees contributions, up to the first
6% of base compensation contributed by eligible employees. A
member becomes fully vested in the Companys
82
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
contributions upon (a) completion of five years of service,
or (b) normal retirement, early retirement, permanent
disability, or death.
During 2007, the Company modified the employer match for the
401(k) plan. Prior to July 9, 2007, the Company contributed
an amount equal to one-half of the employee contribution up to
the first 6% of base compensation contributed by eligible
employees for the first three years of participation. Subsequent
years of participation in excess of three years increased the
Company matching contribution from 50% to 100% of an
employees contributions, up to the first 6% of base
compensation contributed by eligible employees.
The Company also maintains a profit-sharing plan in which the
Company can contribute to the participants 401(k) account,
at its discretion, up to the legal limit of the Internal Revenue
Code. The Companys contributions to these plans aggregated
approximately $166,000, $270,000, and $444,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The
Company did not contribute to the profit sharing plan during
2008 and 2007.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the
Northfield Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ESOP). The
ESOP is a tax-qualified plan designed to invest primarily in the
Companys common stock. The ESOP provides employees with
the opportunity to receive a funded retirement benefit from the
Bank, based primarily on the value of the Companys common
stock. The ESOP was authorized to and did purchase,
1,756,279 shares of the Companys common stock in the
Companys initial public offering at a price of $10.00 per
share. This purchase was funded with a loan from Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. to the ESOP. The first payment on the loan from
the ESOP to the Company was due and paid on December 31,
2007 and the outstanding balance at December 31, 2008 and
2007 was $16.2 million and $16.4 million,
respectively. The shares of the Companys common stock
purchased in the initial public offering are pledged as
collateral for the loan. Shares will be released for allocation
to participants as loan payments are made. A total of 58,643 and
58,543 shares were released and allocated to participants
for the ESOP year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. ESOP compensation expense for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, was $644,000 and $621,000,
respectively.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted a
Supplemental Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the SESOP) a
non-qualified plan that provides supplemental benefits to
certain executives who are prevented from receiving the full
benefits contemplated by ESOPs benefit formula under tax
law limits for tax-qualified plans. The supplemental payments
for the SESOP consist of cash payments representing the value of
Company shares that cannot be allocated to participants under
the ESOP due to legal limitations imposed on tax-qualified
plans. SESOP compensation expense for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, was $70,000 and $48,000,
respectively.
83
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following tables set forth the funded status and components
of postretirement benefit costs at December 31 measurement dates
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
1,285
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
303
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation end of year
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability (included in accrued expenses and other
liabilities)
|
|
$
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amounts recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
187
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
455
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss, transition obligation and prior service
cost that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into net periodic cost in 2009 are $17,000,
$17,000 and $16,000, respectively.
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic
postretirement benefit costs for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit cost included in compensation and
employee benefits
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed discount rate related to plan obligations reflects
the weighted average of published market rates for high-quality
corporate bonds with terms similar to those of the plans
expected benefit payments,
84
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
rounded to the nearest quarter percentage point. The
Companys discount rate and rate of compensation increase
used in accounting for the plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at period end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the
year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
At December 31, 2008, a medical cost trend rate of 12.0%
for 2008 decreasing 1.0% per year thereafter until an ultimate
rate of 5.0% is reached, was used in the plans valuation.
The Companys healthcare cost trend rate is based, among
other things, on the Companys own experience and third
party analysis of recent and projected healthcare cost trends.
At December 31, 2007, a medical cost trend rate of 13.00%
for 2008 decreasing 1.00% per year thereafter until an ultimate
rate of 5.0% is reached, was used in the plans valuation.
The Companys healthcare cost trend rate is based, among
other things, on the Companys own experience and third
party analysis of recent and projected healthcare cost trends.
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends
would have the following effects (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Effect on benefits earned and interest cost
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends
would have the following effects (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Aggregate of service and interest components of net periodic
cost (benefit)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments of approximately $88,000, $83,000, and $91,000,
were made in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The benefits
expected to be paid under the postretirement health benefits
plan for the next five years are as follows: $114,000 in 2009;
$121,000 in 2010; $126,000 in 2011; $130,000 in 2012; and
$134,000 in 2013. The benefit payments expected to be paid in
the aggregate for the years 2014 through 2018 are $681,000. The
expected benefits are based on the same assumptions used to
measure the Companys benefit obligation at
December 31, 2008, and include estimated future employee
service.
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act of 2003, or Medicare Act, introduced both a Medicare
prescription-drug benefit and a federal subsidy to sponsors of
retiree health-care plans that provide a benefit at least
actuarially equivalent to the Medicare benefit. The
Company has evaluated the estimated potential subsidy available
under the Medicare Act and the related costs associated with
qualifying for the subsidy. Due to the limited number of
participants in the plan, the Company has concluded that it is
not cost beneficial to apply for the subsidy. Therefore, the
accumulated postretirement
85
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
benefit obligation information and related net periodic
postretirement benefit costs do not reflect the effect of any
potential subsidy.
The Company maintains a nonqualified plan to provide for the
elective deferral of all or a portion of director fees by
members of the participating board of directors, deferral of all
or a portion of the compensation
and/or
annual bonus payable to eligible employees of the Company, and
to provide to certain officers of the Company benefits in excess
of those permitted to be paid by the Companys savings
plan, ESOP, and profit-sharing plan under the applicable
Internal Revenue Code. The plan obligation was approximately
$2,498,000 and $3,653,000 at December 31, 2008, and 2007,
respectively, and is included in accrued expenses and other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. (Income) Expense
under this plan was $(1,331,000), $62,000, and $219,000, for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. The Company invests to fund this future
obligation, in various mutual funds designated as trading
securities. The securities are marked-to-market through current
period earnings as a component of non-interest income. Accrued
obligations under this plan are credited or charged with the
return on the trading securities portfolio as a component of
compensation and benefits expense.
The Company entered into a supplemental retirement agreement
with its former president and current director on July 18,
2006. The agreement provides for 120 monthly payments of
$17,450. The present value of the obligation, of approximately
$1,625,000, was recorded in compensation and benefits expense in
2006. The present value of the obligation as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $1,334,000 and
$1,470,000, respectively.
|
|
(10)
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to
commitments that involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk
in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated
financial statements. These commitments include unused lines of
credit and commitments to extend credit.
At December 31, 2008, the following commitment and
contingent liabilities existed that are not reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
44,012
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
|
36,215
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
401
|
|
The Companys maximum exposure to credit losses in the
event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments
is represented by the contractual amount. The Company uses the
same credit policies in granting commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for amounts recorded in the consolidated
balance sheets. These commitments and obligations do not
necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Company
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary,
is based on managements assessment of risk. The unused
consumer lines of credit are collateralized by mortgages on real
estate. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments
issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer
to a third party. The guarantees generally extend for a term of
up to one year and are fully collateralized. For each guarantee
issued, if the customer defaults on a payment to the third
party, the Company would have to perform under the guarantee.
The unamortized fee on standby letters of credit approximates
their fair value; such fees were insignificant at
December 31, 2008. The Company maintains an allowance for
estimated losses on commitments to extend credit. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the allowance was $390,000 and
$204,000, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, the Company was obligated under
noncancelable operating leases and capitalized leases on
property used for banking purposes. Most leases contain
escalation clauses and renewal options which provide for
increased rentals as well as for increases in certain property
costs including real estate taxes, common area maintenance, and
insurance.
86
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The projected minimum annual rental payments and receipts under
the capitalized leases and operating leases are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Receipts
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2010
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2011
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2012
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2013
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
23,652
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
32,948
|
|
|
|
2,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net, rental expense included in occupancy expense amounted to
approximately $1,466,000, $1,140,000, and $1,181,000, for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the Company may be a party to
various outstanding legal proceedings and claims. In the opinion
of management, the consolidated financial statements will not be
materially affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and
claims.
The Bank is required by regulation to maintain a certain level
of cash balances on hand
and/or on
deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. As of
December 31, 2008, and 2007, the Bank was required to
maintain balances of $3,762,000 and $2,647,000, respectively.
The Bank has entered into employment agreements with its Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and the other executive officers of the
Bank to ensure the continuity of executive leadership, to
clarify the roles and responsibilities of executives, and to
make explicit the terms and conditions of executive employment.
These agreements are for a term of three-years subject to review
and annual renewal, and provide for certain levels of base
annual salary and in the event of a change in control, as
defined, or event of termination, as defined, certain levels of
base salary, bonus payments, and benefits for a period of up to
three-years.
On May 26, 2006, the Bank entered into a purchase and
assumption agreement with a third party which includes the
purchase of certain premises, equipment, and leaseholds of two
of the Banks branches. The agreement also provides for the
third party to assume the deposit liabilities of the two
branches, totaling approximately $29.0 million as of
December 31, 2006, and related lease obligations. The
purchase and assumption agreement is at or above the Banks
carrying value of the related assets purchased and liabilities
and obligations being assumed. The transaction closed in the
first quarter of 2007 and the Company recognized a gain on the
sale of premises and equipment and related deposit relationships
of approximately $4.3 million.
|
|
(11)
|
Regulatory
Requirements
|
Northfield Bank converted to a federally-charted savings bank
from a New York-chartered savings bank effective
November 6, 2007. Northfield Banks regulator is the
Office of Thrift Supervision OTS (previously Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC). Simultaneously
with Northfield Banks conversion, Northfield Bancorp, MHC
and Northfield Bancorp, Inc. converted to federal-charters from
New York-chartered holding companies.
87
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The OTS requires banks to maintain a minimum tangible capital
ratio to tangible assets of 1.5%, a minimum core capital ratio
to total adjusted assets of 4.0%, and a minimum ratio of total
risk-adjusted total assets of 8.0%.
Under prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is required
to take certain supervisory actions (and may take additional
discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized
institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on
the institutions financial statements. The regulations
establish a framework for the classification of savings
institutions into five categories: well capitalized, adequately
capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized,
and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is
considered well capitalized if it has a core capital ratio of at
least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6%,
and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%.
The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are
also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about
capital components, risk weighting, and other factors.
Management believes that, as of December 31, 2008, the Bank
met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
Further, the most recent OTS notification categorized the Bank
as a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective
action regulations. There have been no conditions or events
since that notification that management believes have changed
the Banks capital classification.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is regulated, supervised and examined
by the OTS as a savings and loan holding company and, as such,
is not subject to regulatory capital requirements.
The following is a summary of Northfield Banks regulatory
capital amounts and ratios compared to the OTS requirements as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, for classification as well
capitalized institution and minimum capital (dollars in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTS Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital Adequacy
|
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Purposes
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to tangible assets
|
|
$
|
272,480
|
|
|
|
15.98
|
%
|
|
|
25,577
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Tier 1 captial (core) (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
272,480
|
|
|
|
15.98
|
|
|
|
68,205
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
85,257
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Total capital (to risk- weighted assets)
|
|
|
281,648
|
|
|
|
34.81
|
|
|
|
64,728
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
80,910
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
As of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to tangible assets
|
|
$
|
257,274
|
|
|
|
18.84
|
%
|
|
|
20,484
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Tier 1 captial (core) (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
257,274
|
|
|
|
18.84
|
|
|
|
54,622
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
68,278
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Total capital (to risk- weighted assets)
|
|
|
263,114
|
|
|
|
38.07
|
|
|
|
55,286
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
69,107
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth
below for the Companys financial instruments.
|
|
(a)
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents, and Certificates of Deposit
|
Cash and cash equivalents are short-term in nature with original
maturities of three months or less; the carrying amount
approximates fair value. Certificates of deposits having
original terms of six-months or less;
88
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
carrying value generally approximates fair value. Certificate of
deposits with an original maturity of six months or greater the
fair value is derived from discounted cash flows.
The fair values for substantially all of our securities are
obtained from an independent nationally recognized pricing
service. The independent pricing service utilizes market prices
of same or similar securities whenever such prices are
available. Prices involving distressed sellers are not utilized
in determining fair value. Where necessary, the independent
third party pricing service estimates fair value using models
employing techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses. The
assumptions used in these models typically include assumptions
for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayments, utilizing
market observable data where available.
|
|
(c)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York Stock
|
The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock is
its carrying value, since this is the amount for which it could
be redeemed and there is no active market for this stock.
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar
financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as
residential mortgage, construction, land, multifamily,
commercial and consumer. Each loan category is further segmented
into amortizing and
non-amortizing
and fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing
and nonperforming categories. The fair value of loans is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current
prepayment assumptions and current rates at which similar loans
would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for
the same remaining maturities.
Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on
external appraisals of collateral securing such loans, adjusted
for the timing of anticipated cash flows.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as
non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, and NOW and money
market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The
fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted
value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated
using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
|
|
(f)
|
Commitments
to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit
|
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged
to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the
remaining terms of the agreements and the present
creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan
commitments, fair value also considers the difference between
current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The
fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments is insignificant and
therefore not included in the following table.
The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting future
cash flows based on rates currently available for debt with
similar terms and remaining maturity.
89
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(h)
|
Advance
Payments by Borrowers
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance have no
stated maturity; the fair value is equal to the amount currently
payable.
The estimated fair values of the Companys significant
financial instruments at December 31, 2008, and 2007, are
presented in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
|
|
53,873
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
|
24,546
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
802,817
|
|
|
|
802,817
|
|
Securities held-to- maturity
|
|
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
19,686
|
|
|
|
19,440
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
6,702
|
|
|
|
6,702
|
|
Net loans held-for-investment
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
610,713
|
|
|
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
419,449
|
|
Loans held-for-sale
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
1,027,896
|
|
|
|
877,225
|
|
|
|
878,230
|
|
Repurchase Agreements and other borrowings
|
|
|
332,084
|
|
|
|
340,404
|
|
|
|
124,420
|
|
|
|
125,176
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers
|
|
$
|
3,823
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based
on relevant market information and information about the
financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium
or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time
the Companys entire holdings of a particular financial
instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion
of the Companys financial instruments, fair value
estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of
various financial instruments, and other factors. These
estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and
matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could
significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and
off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to
estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value
of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial
instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the
realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a
significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been
considered in the estimates.
|
|
(13)
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
The following table presents the assets reported on the
consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair value as of
December 31, 2008, by level within the fair value hierarchy
as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. Financial assets and liabilities are
90
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
classified in their entirety based on the level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value
hierarchy is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement
date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices
included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability (for example,
interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss
severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are
derived principally from or corroborated by observable market
data by correlations or other means.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs Significant unobservable inputs
that reflect the Companys own assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
|
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2008, segregated by the level of the valuation
inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair
value:
Fair
Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
931,209
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
931,209
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
948,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
960,083
|
|
|
$
|
11,523
|
|
|
$
|
948,560
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale Securities: The estimated
fair values for mortgage-backed and corporate securities are
obtained from a nationally recognized third-party pricing
service. The estimated fair values are derived primarily from
cash flow models, which include assumptions for interest rates,
credit losses, and prepayment speeds. Broker/dealer quotes are
utilized as well when such quotes are available and deemed
representative of the market. The significant inputs utilized in
the cash flow models are based on market data obtained from
sources independent of the Company (observable inputs,) and are
therefore classified as Level 2 within the fair value
hierarchy. Management reviews the data and assumptions used in
pricing the securities by its third party provider to ensure the
lowest level of significant input is market observable data. The
estimated fair value of equity securities classified as Level 1
are derived from quoted market prices in active markets, these
assets consist of money market mutual funds.
Trading Securities: Fair values are derived
from quoted market prices in active markets. The assets consist
of publicly traded mutual funds.
91
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure
the fair value of certain other financial assets on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value
usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market
accounting or write downs of individual assets.
Impaired Assets: At December 31, 2008,
the Company had impaired loans with outstanding principal
balances of $6.6 million that were recorded at their
estimated fair value of $6.3 million. The Company recorded
impairment charges of $1.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, utilizing Level 3 inputs.
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Company transferred a loan with a principal balance of
$2.1 million and an estimated fair value, less costs to
sell , of $1.1 million to other real estate owned. During
the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company recorded
impairment charges of $402,000 prior to the transfer of the loan
to OREO utilizing Level 3 inputs. Impaired assets are
valued utilizing current appraisals adjusted downward by
management, as necessary, for changes in relevant valuation
factors subsequent to the appraisal date.
Certain non-financial assets and liabilities measured on a
recurring and nonrecurring basis include goodwill and other
intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets. The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has
delayed provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to the fair
value measurement of non-financial assets and liabilities until
fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008;
therefore, the Company will apply the applicable provisions of
SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities
beginning January 1, 2009.
|
|
(14)
|
Parent-only
Financial Information
|
The following condensed parent company only financial
information reflects Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s investment
in its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, Northfield Bank,
using the equity method of accounting.
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in Northfield Bank
|
|
$
|
42,555
|
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
30,153
|
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
Investment in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
289,097
|
|
|
|
270,738
|
|
Corporate bonds available-for-sale
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP loan receivable
|
|
|
16,179
|
|
|
|
16,358
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
|
|
5,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
367,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
367,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest on ESOP loan
|
|
$
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on deposit in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on corporate bonds
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of Northfield Bank
|
|
|
14,103
|
|
|
|
18,083
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
17,883
|
|
|
|
18,419
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution to charitable foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
(4,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
7,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
Contribution of stock to charitable foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
(3,336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in due from Northfield Bank
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in other assets
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premium on corporate bond
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of Northfield Bank
|
|
|
(14,103
|
)
|
|
|
(18,083
|
)
|
|
|
(10,842
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional investment in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of corporate bond
|
|
|
(4,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on ESOP loan receivable
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchase of certificate of deposits
|
|
|
(23,653
|
)
|
|
|
(6,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(27,942
|
)
|
|
|
(117,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock offering, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from Northfield Bancorp, MHC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(25,869
|
)
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
42,555
|
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 30, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors awarded 832,450 shares of restricted
stock, and 2,102,600 stock options with tandem stock
appreciation rights to employees and directors in accordance
with the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan approved by the stockholders
of the Company on December 17, 2008.
On February 13, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the
Company intends to repurchase up to 2,240,153 shares,
representing approximately 5% of its outstanding shares. The
timing of the repurchases will depend on certain factors,
including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the
Companys liquidity and capital requirements, and
alternative uses of capital. Any repurchased shares will be held
as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate
purposes. The Company is conducting such repurchases in
accordance with a
Rule 10b5-1
trading plan.
94
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly
financial data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
17,315
|
|
|
|
18,097
|
|
|
|
19,034
|
|
|
|
20,603
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,724
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
|
|
8,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
10,591
|
|
|
|
11,547
|
|
|
|
12,242
|
|
|
|
12,413
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
1,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,993
|
|
|
|
10,307
|
|
|
|
10,966
|
|
|
|
10,445
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
5,986
|
|
|
|
5,939
|
|
|
|
6,703
|
|
|
|
6,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
7,406
|
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,605
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
15,502
|
|
|
|
15,644
|
|
|
|
16,637
|
|
|
|
17,919
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,244
|
|
|
|
7,397
|
|
|
|
7,478
|
|
|
|
6,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
8,258
|
|
|
|
8,247
|
|
|
|
9,159
|
|
|
|
11,202
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7,818
|
|
|
|
8,150
|
|
|
|
8,959
|
|
|
|
10,497
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,602
|
|
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
18,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
7,394
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
4,920
|
|
|
|
(6,885
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
2,701
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
1,855
|
|
|
|
(7,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
4,693
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share(1)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share is calculated for the period that the
Companys shares of common stock were outstanding
(November 8, 2007 through December 31, 2007). The net
loss for this period was $1,501,000 and the weighted average
common shares outstanding were 43,076,586. |
95
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
John W. Alexander, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Steven M. Klein, our Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) the
Exchange Act as of December 31, 2008. Based
upon their evaluation, they each found that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file
and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported as and when required and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2008 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting and we
identified no material weaknesses requiring corrective action
with respect to those controls.
Management
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
in the Exchange Act. The Companys internal control system
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the
Companys management and board of directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies
and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions
and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and the directors of the Company;
and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on our
financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have
inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, we used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment we believe that, as of
December 31, 2008, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm
that audited the consolidated financial statements has issued an
audit report on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,
and is included in Item 8, under Part II of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
This report appears on page 59 of the document.
96
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The sections of the Companys definitive proxy statement
for the Companys 2009 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders
(the 2009 Proxy Statement) entitled
Proposal I-Election
of Directors, Other Information-Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Corporate
Governance and Board Matters -Codes of Conduct and Ethics,
-Stockholder Communications, and -Board of
Directors, Meetings and Standing Committees-Audit
Committee are incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The section of the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement entitled
Corporate Governance and Board
Matters-Director
Compensation, and Executive Compensation are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The Section of the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement entitled
Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof and
Proposal I-Election
of Directors are incorporated herein by reference
The Company does not have any equity compensation program that
was not approved by stockholders, other than its employee stock
ownership plan.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The Section of the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement entitled
Corporate Governance and Board Matters-Transactions with
Certain Related Persons is incorporated herein by reference
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The section of the Companys 2009 Proxy Statement entitled
Audit-Related Matters-Policy for Approval of Audit and
Permitted Non-audit Services and Auditor Fees
and Services are incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following documents are filed as part of this
Form 10-K.
(A) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(B) Consolidated Balance Sheets at
December 31, 2008, and 2007
(C) Consolidated Statements of Income Years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
(D) Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders Equity Years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
(E) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
(F) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
97
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
(a)(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Charter of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.*
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.*
|
|
4
|
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.*
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Employee Stock Ownership Plan***
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Kenneth J. Doherty**
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Steven M. Klein**
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Albert J. Regen*
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Northfield Bank 2009 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan****
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Short Term Disability and Long Term Disability for Senior
Management*
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Northfield Bank Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan***
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Northfield Bank Non Qualified Supplemental Employee Stock
Ownership Plan***
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with John W. Alexander
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Michael J. Widmer
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment to Northfield Bank Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Amendment to Northfield Bank Non Qualified Supplemental Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreements with Steven M. Klein and
Kenneth J. Doherty
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan*****
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Director Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement
under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Employee Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement
under the Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Form of Employee Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under
the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant*
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (File
No. 333-143643),
originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 11, 2007. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated July 1, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 1, 2008 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
dated December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 31, 2008 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
**** |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
dated December 17, 2008, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 19, 2008 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
***** |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2008
(File Number
001-33732). |
98
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John
W. Alexander
|
John W. Alexander
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Representative)
Date: March 16, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
W. Alexander
John
W. Alexander
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
M. Klein
Steven
M. Klein
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stanley
A. Applebaum
Stanley
A. Applebaum
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
R. Bowen
John
R. Bowen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Annette
Catino
Annette
Catino
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gil
Chapman
Gil
Chapman
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
P. Connors, Jr.
John
P. Connors, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
J. DePierro
John
J. DePierro
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Susan
Lamberti
Susan
Lamberti
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Albert
J. Regen
Albert
J. Regen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick
E. Scura, Jr.
Patrick
E. Scura, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
99