e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2009
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File
No. 001-33732
Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
United States of America
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
42-1572539
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1410 St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
07001
Zip Code
|
(732) 499-7200
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
|
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). YES o NO þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by
reference to price at which the common equity was last sold on
June 30, 2009 was $221,368,111.
As of March 8, 2010, there were outstanding
43,728,268 shares of the Registrants common stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of
the Registrant (Part III).
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC.
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
Forward
Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking
statements, which can be identified by the use of such
words as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan,
seek, and similar expressions. These forward looking statements
include:
|
|
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions, and expectations;
|
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans and prospects and growth
and operating strategies;
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the quality of our assets, including our
loan and investment portfolios; and
|
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.
|
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant
risks, assumptions, and uncertainties, including, among other
things, the following important factors that could affect the
actual outcome of future events:
|
|
|
|
|
significantly increased competition among depository and other
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that
reduce our interest margins or reduce the fair value of
financial instruments;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market
areas, that are worse than expected;
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets;
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our
business;
|
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and take advantage
of growth opportunities, and the possible dilutive effect of
potential acquisitions or de novo branches, if any;
|
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted
by bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB), or other promulgating authorities;
|
|
|
|
inability of third-party providers to perform their obligations
to us; and
|
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans.
|
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future
results may be materially different from the results indicated
by these forward-looking statements.
Northfield
Bancorp, MHC
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is a federally-chartered mutual holding
company and owns 56.12% of the outstanding shares of common
stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as of December 31, 2009.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC has not engaged in any significant
business activity other than owning the common stock of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc., and does not intend to expand its
business activities at this time. So long as Northfield Bancorp,
MHC exists, it is required to own a majority of the voting stock
of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. The home office of Northfield
Bancorp, MHC is located at 1731 Victory Boulevard, Staten
Island, New York, and its telephone number is
(718) 448-1000.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC is subject to comprehensive regulation
and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a federal corporation that completed
its initial public stock offering on November 7, 2007.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s home office is located at 1410
St. Georges Avenue, Avenel, New Jersey 07001 and the telephone
number is
(732) 499-7200.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s significant business
1
activities have been holding the common stock of Northfield Bank
(the Bank) and investing the proceeds from its initial public
offering. Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as the holding company of
Northfield Bank, is authorized to pursue other business
activities permitted by applicable laws and regulations for
subsidiaries of federally-chartered mutual holding companies,
which may include the acquisition of banking and financial
services companies. We have no plans for any mergers or
acquisitions, or other diversification of the activities of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at the present time. In addition to the
Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. also owns Northfield Investments,
Inc., a New Jersey investment company, which currently is
inactive. When we use the term Company,
We, or Our we are referring to the
activities of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries. When we refer to the holding company we are
referring to the stand-alone activities of Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. When we refer to the Bank we are referring to
the activities of Northfield Bank and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
Our cash flow depends on earnings on our investments and from
dividends received from Northfield Bank. Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. neither owns nor leases any property from outside parties,
but instead uses the premises, equipment, and furniture of
Northfield Bank. At the present time, we employ as officers only
certain persons who are also officers of Northfield Bank and we
use the support staff of Northfield Bank from time to time.
These persons are not separately compensated by Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. reimburses Northfield
Bank for significant costs incurred by the Bank on its behalf.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may hire additional employees, as
appropriate, to the extent it expands its business in the future.
Northfield
Bank
Northfield Bank was organized in 1887 and is currently a
federally chartered savings bank. Northfield Bank conducts
business primarily from its home office located at 1731 Victory
Boulevard, Staten Island, New York, its operations center
located at 581 Main Street, Woodbridge, NJ, and its 17
additional branch offices located in New York and New Jersey.
The branch offices are located in the New York counties of
Richmond (Staten Island) and Kings (Brooklyn) and the New Jersey
counties of Union and Middlesex. The telephone number at
Northfield Banks home office is
(718) 448-1000.
Northfield Banks principal business consists of
originating commercial real estate loans and multifamily real
estate loans, purchasing investment securities including
mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds, as well as
depositing funds in other financial institutions. Northfield
Bank also offers construction and land loans, commercial and
industrial loans, one- to four-family residential mortgage
loans, and home equity loans and lines of credit. Northfield
Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts, including
certificates of deposit, passbook, statement, and money market
savings accounts, transactions deposit accounts (Negotiable
Orders of Withdrawal (NOW) accounts and non-interest bearing
demand accounts), individual retirement accounts, and to a
lesser extent when it is deemed cost effective, brokered
deposits. Deposits are Northfield Banks primary source of
funds for its lending and investing activities. Northfield Bank
also uses borrowed funds as a source of funds, principally from
the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLB). In addition to
traditional banking services, Northfield Bank offers insurance
products through NSB Insurance Agency, Inc. Northfield Bank owns
100% of NSB Services Corp., which, in turn, owns 100% of the
voting common stock of a real estate investment trust, NSB
Realty Trust, which holds primarily mortgage loans and other
real estate related investments.
Available
Information
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is a public company, and files interim,
quarterly, and annual reports with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These respective reports are on file and a matter of
public record with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
may be read and copied at the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an Internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements,
and other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC
(http://www.sec.gov).
2
Our website address is www.eNorthfield.com. Information
on our website should not be considered a part of this annual
report.
Market
Area and Competition
We have been in business for over 122 years, offering a
variety of financial products and services to meet the needs of
the communities we serve. Our retail banking network consists of
multiple delivery channels including full-service banking
offices, automated teller machines, and telephone and internet
banking capabilities. We consider our competitive products and
pricing, branch network, reputation for superior customer
service, and financial strength, as our major strengths in
attracting and retaining customers in our market areas.
We face intense competition in our market areas both in making
loans and attracting deposits. Our market areas have a high
concentration of financial institutions, including large money
center and regional banks, community banks, and credit unions.
We face additional competition for deposits from money market
funds, brokerage firms, mutual funds, and insurance companies.
Some of our competitors offer products and services that we do
not offer, such as trust services and private banking.
In addition, turmoil in the United States and world economies,
and more specifically in the financial services industry, has
resulted in financial services companies such as investment
banking institutions, and automobile and real estate finance
companies, electing to become bank holding companies. These
financial services companies have traditionally received their
funding from sources other than insured bank deposits. Many of
the alternative funding sources traditionally utilized by these
companies are no longer available and has resulted in these
companies relying more on insured bank deposits to fund their
operations, increasing competition for deposits and related
costs of such deposits.
Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the
communities surrounding our banking offices in the New York
Counties of Richmond (Staten Island) and Kings (Brooklyn), and
Union and Middlesex Counties in New Jersey. As of June 30,
2009 (the latest date for which information is publicly
available), we ranked fifth in deposit market share, with an
8.85% market share, in Staten Island, with 0.09% market share in
Brooklyn, New York. In Middlesex and Union Counties in New
Jersey, as of June 30, 2009, we had a combined market share
of 0.69%.
While the disruption in the financial markets has negatively
impacted the banking industry, it has created other
opportunities for the Bank. With many lenders reducing the
amount of loans being made, we continued lending to qualified
borrowers and increased the number of new customers and new
loans. While our lending has increased in this difficult
environment, we remain focused on maintaining our loan
underwriting standards. We do not originate or purchase
sub-prime
loans, negative amortization loans or option ARM loans. The
continued deterioration in the economy could make it more
difficult in the future to maintain the loan growth we
experienced during 2009.
Lending
Activities
Our principal lending activity is the origination of multifamily
real estate loans and commercial real estate loans. We also
originate one- to four-family residential real estate loans,
construction and land loans, commercial and industrial loans,
and home equity loans and lines of credit. In October 2009, we
began to offer loans to finance premiums on insurance policies,
including commercial property and casualty, and professional
liability insurance.
3
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following
table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio, by type
of loan at the dates indicated, excluding loans held for sale of
$0, $0, $270,000, $125,000, and $0 at December 31, 2009,
2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
327,802
|
|
|
|
44.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
289,123
|
|
|
|
49.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
243,902
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
207,680
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
%
|
|
$
|
165,657
|
|
|
|
42.72
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
90,898
|
|
|
|
12.48
|
|
|
|
103,128
|
|
|
|
17.49
|
|
|
|
95,246
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
107,572
|
|
|
|
26.29
|
|
|
|
127,477
|
|
|
|
32.87
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
44,548
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
52,158
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
44,850
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
52,124
|
|
|
|
12.74
|
|
|
|
52,890
|
|
|
|
13.64
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
178,401
|
|
|
|
24.48
|
|
|
|
108,534
|
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
14,164
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
14,105
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
26,118
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
24,182
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
12,797
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
|
|
13,922
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
16,105
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
19,252
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
11,397
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
11,022
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
8,068
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
40,382
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
3,597
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
3,510
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
728,700
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
589,489
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
424,198
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
409,193
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
387,812
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs (fees), net
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,636
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,030
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
$
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
404,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
382,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Portfolio Maturities. The following table
summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio at
December 31, 2009. Demand loans (loans having no stated
repayment schedule or maturity) and overdraft loans are reported
as being due in the year ending December 31, 2010.
Maturities are based on the final contractual payment date and
do not reflect the effect of prepayments and scheduled principal
amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
|
One- to Four-Family Residential
|
|
|
Construction and Land
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Due during the years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
|
$
|
22,322
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,496
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
6,219
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
6.19
|
|
|
|
12,084
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
6.93
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
|
7.02
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 to 2014
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
6.39
|
|
2015 to 2019
|
|
|
8,129
|
|
|
|
6.55
|
|
|
|
21,032
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
2020 to 2024
|
|
|
27,460
|
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
|
|
10,687
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
7.75
|
|
|
|
13,952
|
|
|
|
6.64
|
|
2025 and beyond
|
|
|
276,779
|
|
|
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
55,176
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
|
|
|
9,564
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
157,384
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
327,802
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
90,898
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
%
|
|
$
|
44,548
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
$
|
178,401
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity and Lines of Credit
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
|
Insurance Premium
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Due during the years ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
6.23
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,349
|
|
|
|
6.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,229
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
|
$
|
83,299
|
|
|
|
6.24
|
%
|
2011
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
19,862
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,227
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
9.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
2013 to 2014
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
5.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,627
|
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
2015 to 2019
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
7.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,617
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
2020 to 2024
|
|
|
6,527
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
|
|
|
5,078
|
|
|
|
6.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,841
|
|
|
|
6.21
|
|
2025 and beyond
|
|
|
11,729
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511,371
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26,118
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
19,252
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
40,382
|
|
|
|
6.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
%
|
|
$
|
728,700
|
|
|
|
6.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has a total of $511.4 million in loans due to
mature in 2025 and beyond, of which $33.5 million or 6.6%,
are fixed rate loans.
The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of
fixed- and adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2009, that
are contractually due after December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
Adjustable Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
21,538
|
|
|
$
|
300,458
|
|
|
$
|
321,996
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
49,528
|
|
|
|
41,346
|
|
|
|
90,874
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
13,823
|
|
|
|
22,226
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
|
|
163,816
|
|
|
|
172,905
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
15,487
|
|
|
|
10,015
|
|
|
|
25,502
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
8,452
|
|
|
|
11,795
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
107,491
|
|
|
$
|
537,910
|
|
|
$
|
645,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Commercial real
estate loans totaled $327.8 million, or 44.99% of our loan
portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Commercial real estate
loans at December 31, 2009 included $31.1 million
secured primarily by hotels and motels, $57.0 million
secured by office buildings, and $65.5 million secured by
manufacturing buildings. Approximately $152.1 million of
our commercial real estate loans are owner-occupied businesses.
At December 31, 2009, our commercial real estate loan
portfolio consisted of 327 loans with an average loan balance of
approximately $1.0 million although there are a large
number of loans with balances substantially greater than this
average. At December 31, 2009, our largest commercial real
estate loan had a principal balance of $9.7 million, and
was secured by a hotel. At December 31, 2009, this loan was
performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
Substantially all of our commercial real estate loans are
secured by properties located in our primary market areas.
Our commercial real estate loans typically amortize over 20- to
25-years
with interest rates that adjust after an initial five- or
10-year
period, and every five years thereafter. Margins generally range
from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the
average yield on United States Treasury securities, adjusted to
a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the Federal
Reserve Board. Variable rate loans originated during
5
2009, have generally been indexed to the five year London
Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) swaps rate as published in the
Federal Reserve Statistical Release adjusted for a negotiated
margin. We also originate, to a lesser extent, 10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our commercial
real estate loans have interest rate floors equal to the
interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and have
prepayment penalties should the loan be repaid in the first
three to five years.
In the underwriting of commercial real estate loans, we
generally lend up to the lesser of 75% of the propertys
appraised value or purchase price. Certain single use property
types have lower loan to appraised value ratios. We base our
decision to lend primarily on the economic viability of the
property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In evaluating
a proposed commercial real estate loan, we emphasize the ratio
of the propertys projected net cash flow to the
loans debt service requirement (generally requiring a
minimum ratio of 120%), computed after deduction for a vacancy
factor, where applicable, and property expenses we deem
appropriate. Personal guarantees are usually obtained from
commercial real estate borrowers. We require title insurance,
fire and extended coverage casualty insurance, and, if
appropriate, flood insurance, in order to protect our security
interest in the underlying property. Although a significant
portion of our commercial real estate loans are referred by
brokers, we underwrite all commercial real estate loans in
accordance with our underwriting standards.
Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher interest
rates and have shorter terms than one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans
generally have greater credit risks compared to one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, as they typically
involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers
or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment of
loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends
on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the
loan generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income
from the property to cover operating expenses and debt service.
Changes in economic conditions that are not in the control of
the borrower or lender could affect the value of the collateral
for the loan or the future cash flow of the property.
Additionally, any decline in real estate values may be more
pronounced for commercial real estate than residential
properties.
Multifamily Real Estate Loans. In recent
years, the Company has focused on originating multifamily real
estate loans. Loans secured by multifamily and mixed use
properties totaled approximately $178.4 million, or 24.48%
of our total loan portfolio, at December 31, 2009. Mixed
use properties classified as multifamily are defined by the
Company as having more than four residential family units and a
business or businesses. At December 31, 2009, we had 219
multifamily real estate loans with an average loan balance of
approximately $815,000. At December 31, 2009, our largest
multifamily real estate loan had a principal balance of
$7.9 million and was performing in accordance with its
original contractual terms. Substantially all of our multifamily
real estate loans are secured by properties located in our
market areas.
Our multifamily real estate loans typically amortize over 20- to
30-years
with interest rates that adjust after an initial five- or
10-year
period, and every five years thereafter. Margins generally range
from 275 basis points to 350 basis points above the
average yield on United States Treasury securities, adjusted to
a constant maturity of similar term, as published by the Federal
Reserve Board. Variable rate loans originated during 2009
generally have been indexed to the five year LIBOR swaps rate as
published in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release adjusted
for a negotiated margin. We also originate, to a lesser extent,
10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our multifamily
real estate loans have interest rate floors equal to the
interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and have
prepayment penalties should the loan be prepaid in the first
three to five years.
In underwriting multifamily real estate loans, we consider a
number of factors, including the projected net cash flow to the
loans debt service requirement (generally requiring a
minimum ratio of 115%), the age and condition of the collateral,
the financial resources and income level of the borrower, and
the borrowers experience in owning or managing similar
properties. Multifamily real estate loans generally are
originated in amounts up to 75% of the appraised value of the
property securing the loan. Due to competitor considerations, we
typically do not obtain personal guarantees from multifamily
real estate borrowers.
6
Loans secured by multifamily real estate properties generally
have greater credit risk than one- to four-family residential
real estate loans. This increased credit risk is a result of
several factors, including the concentration of principal in a
limited number of loans and borrowers, the effects of general
economic conditions on income producing properties, and the
increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of
loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by
multifamily real estate properties typically depends on the
successful operation of the property. If the cash flow from the
project is reduced, the borrowers ability to repay the
loan may be impaired.
In a ruling that was contrary to a 1996 advisory opinion from
the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal
that owners of housing units who benefited from the receipt of
J-51
tax incentives under the Rent Stabilization Law are eligible to
decontrol apartments, the New York State Court of Appeals ruled,
on October 22, 2009, that residential housing units located
in two major housing complexes in New York City had been
illegally decontrolled by the current and previous property
owners. This ruling may subject other property owners that have
previously or are currently benefiting from a J-51 tax incentive
to litigation, possibly resulting in a significant reduction to
property cashflows. Based on managements assessment of its
multifamily loan portfolio, it believes that only one loan may
be affected by the recent ruling regarding
J-51. The
loan has a principal balance of $7.9 million at
December 31, 2009, and is correct to its original
contractual terms.
Construction and Land Loans. At
December 31, 2009, construction and land loans totaled
$44.5 million, or 6.11% of total loans receivable. At
December 31, 2009, the additional unadvanced portion of
these construction loans totaled $7.7 million. At
December 31, 2009, we had 50 construction and land loans
with an average loan balance of approximately $890,000. At
December 31, 2009, our largest construction and land loan
had a principal balance of $4.9 million and was for the
purpose of purchasing land. This loan is performing in
accordance with its original contractual terms.
Our construction and land loans typically are interest only
loans with interest rates that are tied to a prime rate index as
published by the Wall Street Journal. Margins generally range
from zero basis points to 200 basis points above the prime
rate index. We also originate, to a lesser extent, 10- to
15-year
fixed-rate, fully amortizing land loans. In general, our
construction and land loans have interest rate floors equal to
the interest rate on the date the loan is originated, and we do
not typically charge prepayment penalties.
We grant construction and land loans to experienced developers
for the construction of single-family residences including
condominiums, and commercial properties. Construction and land
loans also are made to individuals for the construction of their
personal residences. Advances on construction loans are made in
accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction,
but are generally limited to a
loan-to-completed-appraised-value
ratio of 70%. Repayment of construction loans on residential
properties normally is expected from the sale of units to
individual purchasers, or in the case of individuals building
their own, with a permanent mortgage. In the case of
income-producing property, repayment usually is expected from
permanent financing upon completion of construction. We
typically offer the permanent mortgage financing on our
construction loans on income-producing properties.
Land loans also help finance the purchase of land intended for
future development, including single-family housing, multifamily
housing, and commercial property. In some cases, we may make an
acquisition loan before the borrower has received approval to
develop the land. In general, the maximum
loan-to-value
ratio for a land acquisition loan is 50% of the appraised value
of the property, and the maximum term of these loans is two
years. If the maturity of the loan exceeds two years, the loan
must be an amortizing loan.
Construction and land loans generally carry higher interest
rates and have shorter terms than one- to four- family
residential real estate loans. Construction and land loans have
greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved,
owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan
depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the
value of the real estate at completion of construction as
compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of
construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of
construction costs is inaccurate, we may decide to advance
additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order
to protect the value of the real estate. However, if the
estimated value of the completed project is inaccurate, the
borrower may hold the real estate with a value that is
insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction loan
upon its sale. In the event we make a land acquisition loan on
real estate that is not yet
7
approved for the planned development, there is a risk that
approvals will not be granted or will be delayed. Construction
loans also expose us to a risk that improvements will not be
completed on time in accordance with specifications and
projected costs. In addition, the ultimate sale or rental of the
real estate may not occur as anticipated and the market value of
collateral, when completed, may be less that the outstanding
loans against the real estate. Substantially all of our
construction and land loans are secured by real estate located
in our primary market areas.
Commercial and Industrial Loans. At
December 31, 2009, commercial and industrial loans totaled
$19.3 million, or 2.64% of the total loan portfolio. As of
December 31, 2009, we had 85 commercial and industrial
loans with an average loan balance of approximately $227,000,
although we originate these types of loans in amounts
substantially greater and smaller than this average. At
December 31, 2009, our largest commercial and industrial
loan had a principal balance of $3.0 million and was
performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
Our commercial and industrial loans typically amortize over
10 years with interest rates that are tied to a prime rate
index as published in the Wall Street Journal. Margins generally
range from zero basis points to 300 basis points above the
prime rate index. We also originate, to a lesser extent,
10 year fixed-rate, fully amortizing loans. In general, our
commercial and industrial loans have interest rate floors equal
to the interest rate on the date the loan is originated and have
prepayment penalties.
We make various types of secured and unsecured commercial and
industrial loans to customers in our market area for the purpose
of working capital and other general business purposes. The
terms of these loans generally range from less than one year to
a maximum of 15 years. The loans are either negotiated on a
fixed-rate basis or carry adjustable interest rates indexed to a
market rate index.
Commercial credit decisions are based on our credit assessment
of the applicant. We evaluate the applicants ability to
repay in accordance with the proposed terms of the loan and
assess the risks involved. Personal guarantees of the principals
are typically obtained. In addition to evaluating the loan
applicants financial statements, we consider the adequacy
of the primary and secondary sources of repayment for the loan.
Credit agency reports of the guarantors personal credit
history supplement our analysis of the applicants
creditworthiness. We also attempt to confirm with other banks
and conduct trade investigations as part of our credit
assessment of the borrower. Collateral supporting a secured
transaction also is analyzed to determine its marketability.
Commercial and industrial loans generally carry higher interest
rates than one- to four- family residential real estate loans of
like maturity because they have a higher risk of default since
their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of
the borrowers business. Commercial and industrial loans
have greater credit risk than one- to four- family residential
real estate loans.
Insurance premium loans. At December 31,
2009, insurance premium loans totaled $40.4 million, or
5.54% of the total loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2009,
we had 3,925 insurance premium loans with an average loan
balance of approximately $10,000, although we originate these
types of loans in amounts substantially greater and smaller than
this average. At December 31, 2009, our largest insurance
premium loan had a principal balance of $2.1 million and
was performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
Our insurance premium loans typically amortize over nine to
twelve months at fixed rates and typically require a down
payment of 15 20%. These loans are structured (down
payment and repayment term) such that the unpaid loan balance is
generally fully secured by the unearned premiums refundable by
insurance carriers. Insurance premium loan credit decisions
generally are based on our credit assessment of the insurance
carrier, and in some instances, the credit assessment of the
borrower.
One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate
Loans. At December 31, 2009, we had 568 one-
to four-family residential real estate loans outstanding with an
aggregate balance of $90.9 million, or 12.48% of our total
loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2009, the average
balance of one- to four-family residential mortgage real estate
loans was approximately $160,000, although we originate this
type of loan in amounts substantially greater and smaller than
this average. At December 31, 2009, our largest loan of
this type had a principal balance of $2.5 million and was
performing in accordance with its original contractual terms.
8
One- to four-family residential mortgage real estate loans
generally are underwritten according to Freddie Mac guidelines
using their proprietary automated underwriting software
LP, and we refer to loans that conform to such
guidelines as conforming loans. We generally
originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate loans in amounts up to
the maximum conforming loan limits as established by the Office
of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which as of
December 31, 2009, is generally $417,000 for single-family
homes. We also originate loans above the lending limit for
conforming loans, which are referred to as jumbo
loans. We originate a limited number of fixed-rate jumbo
loans with terms generally up to 15 years and
adjustable-rate jumbo loans with an initial fixed-rate period of
10 years. We generally underwrite jumbo loans in a manner
similar to conforming loans. These loans generally are eligible
for sale to various firms that specialize in purchasing
non-conforming loans. Jumbo loans are common in our market area
although we have never sold jumbo loans to any third parties.
We will originate loans with
loan-to-value
ratios in excess of 80%, up to and including a
loan-to-value
ratio of 95%. We require private mortgage insurance for all
loans with
loan-to-value
ratios exceeding 80%. Generally, we will retain in our portfolio
loans with
loan-to-value
ratios up to and including 90%, and sell loans with
loan-to-value
ratios that exceed 90%. We currently retain the servicing rights
on loans sold which generates fee income, or income tax credits,
in the case of loans serviced for the State of New York Mortgage
Agency.
We do not offer interest only mortgage loans on one-
to four-family residential properties, where the borrower pays
interest for an initial period, after which the loan converts to
a fully amortizing loan. We also do not offer loans that provide
for negative amortization of principal, such as Option
ARM loans, where the borrower can pay less than the
interest owed on their loan, resulting in an increased principal
balance during the life of the loan. We do not offer
subprime loans (loans that generally target
borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized
by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments,
bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity
as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios).
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. At
December 31, 2009, we had 452 home equity loans and lines
of credit with an aggregate outstanding balance of
$26.1 million, or 3.58% of our total loan portfolio. Of
this total, there were outstanding home equity lines of credit
of $11.6 million, or 1.59% of our total loan portfolio. At
December 31, 2009, the average home equity loans and lines
of credit balance was approximately $58,000 although we
originate these types of loans in amounts substantially greater
and lower than this average. At December 31, 2009, our
largest home equity line of credit was $1.5 million and our
largest home equity loan was $248,000 and both were performing
in accordance with their original contractual terms.
We offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit that
are secured by the borrowers primary residence or second
home. Home equity lines of credit are variable rate loans tied
to a prime rate index as published in the Wall Street Journal
adjusted for a margin, and have a maximum term of 20 years
during which time the borrower is required to make principal
payments based on a
20-year
amortization. Home equity lines generally have interest rate
floors and ceilings. The borrower is permitted to draw against
the line during the entire term. Our home equity lines of credit
have a ceiling rate and a floor rate. Our home equity loans
typically are fully amortizing with fixed terms to
20 years. Home equity loans and lines of credit generally
are underwritten with the same criteria we use to underwrite
fixed-rate, one- to four-family residential real estate loans.
Home equity loans and lines of credit may be underwritten with a
loan-to-value
ratio of 80% when combined with the principal balance of the
existing mortgage loan. We appraise the property securing the
loan at the time of the loan application to determine the value
of the property. At the time we close a home equity loan or line
of credit, we record a mortgage to perfect our security interest
in the underlying collateral.
Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations, and
Servicing. Lending activities are conducted in
all branch locations. All loans we originate for our portfolio
are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures.
Freddie Mac underwriting standards are utilized for loans we
originate to sell in the secondary market. We may, based on
proper approvals, make exceptions to our policies and
procedures. We originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate
loans. Our ability to originate fixed- or adjustable-rate loans
is dependent
9
on the relative customer demand for such loans, which is
affected by various factors including current market interest
rates as well as anticipated future market interest rates. Our
loan origination and sales activity may be adversely affected by
a rising interest rate environment that typically results in
decreased loan demand. A significant portion of our commercial
real estate loans and multifamily real estate loans are
generated by referrals from loan brokers, accountants, and other
professional contacts. Most of our one- to four-family
residential real estate loans are generated through referrals
from branch personnel. Our home equity loans and lines of credit
typically are generated through direct mail advertisements,
newspaper advertisements, and referrals from branch personnel.
We generally retain in our portfolio all adjustable-rate loans
we originate, as well as shorter-term, fixed-rate residential
loans (terms of 10 years or less). Loans we sell consist
primarily of conforming, longer-term, fixed-rate residential
loans. We sold $7.4 million of one- to four-family
residential real estate loans (generally fixed-rate loans, with
terms of 15 years or longer) during the year ended
December 31, 2009, and had no loans
held-for-sale
at December 31, 2009.
We sell our loans without recourse, except for standard
representations and warranties provided in secondary market
transactions. Currently, we retain the servicing rights on all
one- to four-family residential real estate loans we sell. At
December 31, 2009, we were servicing loans owned by others
which consisted of $73.8 million of one- to four-family
residential mortgage loans. Historically, the origination of
loans held for sale and related servicing activity has not been
material to our operations. Loan servicing includes collecting
and remitting loan payments, accounting for principal and
interest, contacting delinquent borrowers, supervising
foreclosures and property dispositions in the event of
unremedied defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments
on behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the
loans. We retain a portion of the interest paid by the borrower
on the loans we service as consideration for our servicing
activities, or receive an income tax credit, in the case of
loans serviced for the State of New York Mortgage Agency.
During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company purchased
approximately $35.4 million in insurance premium loans.
Loan Approval Procedures and
Authority. Northfield Banks lending
activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting
standards established by the Banks board of directors. The
loan approval process is intended to assess the borrowers
ability to repay the loan and value of the collateral that will
secure the loan, if any. To assess the borrowers ability
to repay, we review the borrowers employment and credit
history, and information on the historical and projected income
and expenses of the borrower.
In underwriting a loan secured by real property, we require an
appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser
approved by the Companys board of directors. The appraisal
is subject to review by an independent third party hired by the
Company. We review and inspect properties before disbursement of
funds during the term of a construction loan. Generally,
management obtains updated appraisals when a loan is deemed
impaired. These appraisals may be more limited than those
prepared for the underwriting of a new loan. In addition, when
the Company acquires other real estate owned, it generally
obtains a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying
value of the asset.
In January of 2010, the board of directors established a loan
committee consisting of four bank directors to periodically
review and recommend for approval the Companys policies
related to lending (collectively, the loan policies)
as prepared by management; approve or reject loans meeting
certain criteria; monitor loan quality including concentrations,
and certain other aspects of the lending functions of the
Company, as applicable. Northfield Banks lending officers
have individual lending authority that is approved by the board
of directors.
Non-Performing
and Problem Assets
When a loan is over 15 days delinquent, we generally send
the borrower a late charge notice. When the loan is 30 days
past due, we generally mail the borrower a letter reminding the
borrower of the delinquency and, except for loans secured by
one- to four-family residential real estate, we attempt
personal, direct contact with the borrower to determine the
reason for the delinquency, to ensure that the borrower
correctly
10
understands the terms of the loan, and to emphasize the
importance of making payments on or before the due date. If
necessary, additional late charges and delinquency notices are
issued and the account will be monitored periodically. After the
90th day of delinquency, we will send the borrower a final
demand for payment and generally refer the loan to legal counsel
to commence foreclosure and related legal proceedings. Our loan
officers can shorten these time frames in consultation with the
Chief Lending Officer.
Generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when payment
of principal or interest is 90 days or more delinquent
unless the loan is considered well-secured and in the process of
collection. Loans also are placed on non-accrual status at any
time if the ultimate collection of principal or interest in full
is in doubt. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid
accrued interest is reversed, and further income is recognized
only to the extent received, and only if the principal balance
is deemed fully collectible. The loan may be returned to accrual
status if both principal and interest payments are brought
current and factors indicating doubtful collection no longer
exist, including performance by the borrower under the loan
terms for a six-month period. Our Chief Lending Officer reports
monitored loans, including all loans rated watch, special
mention, substandard, doubtful or loss, to the board of
directors on a monthly basis.
For economic reasons and to maximize the recovery of loans, the
Company works with borrowers experiencing financial
difficulties, and will consider modifications to a
borrowers existing loan terms and conditions that it would
not otherwise consider, commonly referred to as troubled debt
restructurings (TDR). The Company records an
impairment loss associated with TDRs, if any, based on the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the
original loans effective interest rate. The Company will
report the loan as a troubled debt restructuring through the end
of the calendar year that the restructuring takes place and
until such time that the loan yields a market rate of interest
(a rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was
willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new
loan with comparable risk).
Non-Performing and Restructured Loans. The
table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our
non-performing assets at the dates indicated. At
December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005, we had
troubled debt restructurings of $10.7 million,
$1.0 million, $1.3 million, $1.7 million, and
$885,000, respectively, which are included in the appropriate
categories which appear within non-accrual loans. Additionally,
we had $7.3 million of troubled debt restructurings on
accrual status at December 31, 2009 that do not appear in
the table below. We had no troubled debt restructurings on
accrual status at December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
28,802
|
|
|
$
|
4,416
|
|
|
$
|
4,792
|
|
|
$
|
5,167
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
3,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
885
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
41,631
|
|
|
|
9,502
|
|
|
|
8,606
|
|
|
|
6,342
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days or more and still accruing
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
41,822
|
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
9,834
|
|
|
|
7,115
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
43,760
|
|
|
$
|
10,710
|
|
|
$
|
9,834
|
|
|
$
|
7,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,294,747
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,562
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
|
|
424,329
|
|
|
|
409,189
|
|
|
|
387,467
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired
by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of
foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. On the date
property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value, establishing a new cost basis. Estimated
fair value generally represents the sale price a buyer would be
willing to pay on the basis of current market conditions,
including normal terms from other financial institutions, less
the estimated costs to sell the property. Holding costs and
declines in estimated fair value result in charges to expense
after acquisition. At December 31, 2009, the Company owned
12 properties with a combined carrying value of
$1.9 million. The properties consist of 11 single family
and mixed use properties located in Trenton, New Jersey, and one
commercial real estate property located in South Orange, New
Jersey. The Company currently is renting certain of the
properties and has contracted with a third party to assist in
disposing of all properties.
Potential Problem Loans and Classification of
Assets. The current economic environment is
negatively affecting certain borrowers. Our loan officers
continue to monitor their loan portfolios, including evaluation
of borrowers business operations, current financial
condition, underlying values of any collateral, and assessment
of their financial prospects in the current and deteriorating
economic environment. Based on this evaluation, we determine an
appropriate strategy to assist borrowers, with the objective of
maximizing the recovery of the related loan balances.
Our policies, consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for
the classification of loans and other assets that are considered
to be of lesser quality as substandard, doubtful, or loss
assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately
protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the
obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets
include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility
that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the
weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the
added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection
or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly
12
questionable and improbable. Assets (or portions of assets)
classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of
such little value that their continuance as assets is not
warranted. Assets that do not expose us to risk sufficient to
warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories,
but which possess potential weaknesses that deserve our close
attention, are designated as special mention. On the basis of
our review of our assets at December 31, 2009, classified
assets (which are not reported as non-performing assets in the
preceding table) consisted of substandard assets of
$11.5 million, no doubtful or loss assets, and
$14.2 million of assets designated as special mention.
Our determination as to the classification of our assets (and
the amount of our loss allowances) will be subject to review by
our principal federal regulator, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, which can require that we adjust our classification
and related loss allowances. We regularly review our asset
portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification
in accordance with applicable regulations.
Allowance
for Loan Losses
We provide for loan losses based on the consistent application
of our documented allowance for loan loss methodology. Loan
losses are charged to the allowance for loans losses and
recoveries are credited to it. Additions to the allowance for
loan losses are provided by charges against income based on
various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current
recognition in estimating probable losses. We regularly review
the loan portfolio and make adjustments for loan losses in order
to maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The allowance for loan losses consists
primarily of the following two components:
(1) Allowances are established for impaired loans
(generally defined by the company as non-accrual loans with an
outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater). The amount of
impairment provided for as an allowance is represented by the
deficiency, if any, between the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the original loans effective
interest rate or the underlying collateral value (less estimated
costs to sell,) if the loan is collateral dependent, and the
carrying value of the loan. Impaired loans that have no
impairment losses are not considered for general valuation
allowances described below.
(2) General allowances are established for loan losses on a
portfolio basis for loans that do not meet the definition of
impaired. The portfolio is grouped into similar risk
characteristics, primarily loan type,
loan-to-value,
if collateral dependent, and delinquency status. We apply an
estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates applied
are based on our cumulative prior two year loss experience
adjusted, as appropriate, for the environmental factors
discussed below. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it
requires material estimates that may be susceptible to
significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real
estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be
significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we have
established, which could have a material negative effect on our
financial results.
The adjustments to our loss experience are based on our
evaluation of several environmental factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in local, regional, national, and international economic
and business conditions and developments that affect the
collectability of our portfolio, including the condition of
various market segments;
|
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of our portfolio and in the
terms of our loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending
management and other relevant staff;
|
|
|
|
changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume
of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely
classified or graded loans;
|
|
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system;
|
|
|
|
changes in the value of underlying collateral for
collateral-dependent loans;
|
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and
changes in the level of such concentrations; and
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
the effect of other external factors such as competition and
legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated
credit losses in our existing portfolio.
|
In evaluating the estimated loss factors to be utilized for each
loan group, management also reviews actual loss history over an
extended period of time as reported by the OTS and FDIC for
institutions both nationally and in our market area for periods
that are believed to have been under similar economic conditions.
We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based on the combined
total of the impaired and general components. Generally when the
loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, our allowance
for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of
estimated probable losses than would be the case without the
increase. Generally when the loan portfolio decreases, absent
other factors, our allowance for loan loss methodology results
in a lower dollar amount of estimated probable losses than would
be the case without the decrease.
Each quarter we evaluate the allowance for loan losses and
adjust the allowance as appropriate through a provision or
recovery for loan losses. While we use the best information
available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the
allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially
from the information used in making the evaluations. In
addition, as an integral part of their examination process, the
Office of Thrift Supervision will periodically review the
allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may
require us to adjust the allowance based on their analysis of
information available to them at the time of their examination.
Our last examination was as of June 30, 2009.
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for
loan losses for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
$
|
4,795
|
|
|
$
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
(1,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
$
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.37
|
%
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of year
|
|
|
36.86
|
|
|
|
91.07
|
|
|
|
57.31
|
|
|
|
70.70
|
|
|
|
232.88
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans held-for- investment, net at
end of year
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
14
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The
following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses
allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each
category to total loans at the dates indicated. The allowance
for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily
indicative of future losses in any particular category and does
not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other
categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
44.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
49.05
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
57.50
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
12.48
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
17.49
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
24.48
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
3.02
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
Insurance premium loans
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
5.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
15,063
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each
|
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
Allowance for
|
|
|
Category to
|
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
42.72
|
%
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
26.29
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
32.87
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
12.74
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
13.64
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
3.64
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
Insurance premium finance loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
4,988
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
We conduct investment transactions in accordance with our board
approved investment policy which is reviewed at least annually
by the asset liability committee, and any changes to the policy
are subject to ratification by the full board of directors. This
policy dictates that investment decisions give consideration to
the safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential
returns, the ability to provide collateral for pledging
requirements, and consistency with our interest rate risk
management strategy. Our Treasurer executes our securities
portfolio transactions, within policy requirements, with the
approval of either the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief
Financial Officer. NSB Services Corp.s and NSB Realty
Trusts Investment Officers execute security portfolio
transactions in accordance with investment policies that
substantially mirror
15
the Banks investment policy. All purchase and sale
transactions are reviewed by the asset liability committee at
least quarterly.
Our current investment policy permits investments in
mortgage-backed securities, including pass-through securities
and real estate mortgage investment conduits
(REMICs). The investment policy also permits, with
certain limitations, investments in debt securities issued by
the United States Government, agencies of the United States
Government or United States Government-sponsored enterprises
(GSEs), asset-backed securities, money market mutual funds,
federal funds, investment grade corporate bonds, reverse
repurchase agreements, and certificates of deposit.
The Banks investment policy does not permit investment in
municipal bonds, preferred and common stock of other entities
including U.S. Government sponsored enterprises or equity
securities other than our required investment in the common
stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, or as permitted
for community reinvestment purposes or for the purposes of
funding the Banks deferred compensation plan. Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. may invest in equity securities of other financial
institutions up to certain limitations. As of December 31,
2009, we held no asset-backed securities other than
mortgage-backed securities. Our board of directors may change
these limitations in the future.
Our current investment policy does not permit hedging through
the use of such instruments as financial futures, interest rate
options, and swaps.
At the time of purchase, the Company must designate a security
as either
held-to-maturity,
available-for-sale,
or trading, based upon our ability and intent to hold such
securities. Trading securities and securities
available-for-sale
are reported at estimated fair value, and securities
held-to-maturity
are reported at amortized cost. A periodic review and evaluation
of the
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios is conducted to determine if the estimated
fair value of any security has declined below its carrying value
and whether such impairment is
other-than-temporary.
If such impairment is deemed to be
other-than-temporary,
the security is written down to a new cost basis and the
resulting loss is charged against earnings. The estimated fair
values of our securities are obtained from an independent
nationally recognized pricing service (see Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical
Accounting Policies for further discussion). At
December 31, 2009, our investment portfolio consisted
primarily of mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by GSEs and
to a lesser extent private label mortgage-backed securities,
mutual funds, corporate securities, and agency bonds. The market
for these securities primarily consists of other financial
institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment
trusts, and mutual funds.
We purchase mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed
primarily by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae, and to a
lesser extent, we acquire securities issued by private companies
(private label). We invest in mortgage-backed securities to
achieve positive interest rate spreads with minimal
administrative expense, and to lower our credit risk as a result
of the guarantees provided by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie
Mae. In September 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency
placed Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship. The
U.S. Treasury Department has established financing
agreements to ensure that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae meet their
obligations to holders of mortgage-backed securities that they
have issued or guaranteed.
Mortgage-backed securities are securities sold in the secondary
market that are collateralized by pools of mortgages. Certain
types of mortgage-backed securities are commonly referred to as
pass-through certificates because the principal and
interest of the underlying loans is passed through
pro rata to investors, net of certain costs, including servicing
and guarantee fees, in proportion to an investors
ownership in the entire pool. The issuers of such securities
pool mortgages and resell the participation interests in the
form of securities to investors. The interest rate of the
security is lower than the interest rates of the underlying
loans to allow for payment of servicing and guaranty fees.
Ginnie Mae, a United States Government agency, and GSEs, such as
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, may guarantee the payments or
guarantee the timely payment of principal and interest to
investors.
16
Mortgage-backed securities are more liquid than individual
mortgage loans since there is a more active market for such
securities. In addition, mortgage-backed securities may be used
to collateralize our specific liabilities and obligations.
Investments in mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed
by GSEs involve a risk that actual payments will be greater or
less than estimated at the time of purchase, which may require
adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of
any discount relating to such interests, thereby affecting the
net yield on our securities. We periodically review current
prepayment speeds to determine whether prepayment estimates
require modification that could cause adjustment of amortization
or accretion.
REMICs are a type of mortgage-backed security issued by
special-purpose entities that aggregate pools of mortgages and
mortgage-backed securities and create different classes of
securities with varying maturities and amortization schedules,
as well as a residual interest, with each class possessing
different risk characteristics. The cash flows from the
underlying collateral are generally divided into
tranches or classes that have descending priorities
with respect to the distribution of principal and interest cash
flows, while cash flows on pass-through mortgage-backed
securities are distributed pro rata to all security holders.
The timely payment of principal and interest on these REMICs is
generally supported (credit enhanced) in varying degrees by
either insurance issued by a financial guarantee insurer,
letters of credit, over collateralization, or subordination
techniques. Substantially all of these securities are rated
AAA by Standard & Poors or Moodys at the
time of purchase. Privately issued REMICs and pass-throughs can
be subject to certain credit-related risks normally not
associated with U.S. Government agency and
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed
securities. The loss protection generally provided by the
various forms of credit enhancements is limited, and losses in
excess of certain levels are not protected. Furthermore, the
credit enhancement itself may be subject to the creditworthiness
of the credit enhancer. Thus, in the event a credit enhancer
does not fulfill its obligations, the holder could be subject to
risk of loss similar to a purchaser of a whole loan pool.
Management believes that the credit enhancements are adequate to
protect us from material losses on our privately issued
mortgage-backed securities.
At December 31, 2009, our corporate bond portfolio
consisted of $137.1 million of short-term investment grade
securities. Our investment policy provides that we may invest up
to 15% of our tier-one risk-based capital in corporate bonds
from individual issuers which, at the time of purchase, are
within the three highest investment-grade ratings from
Standard & Poors or Moodys. The maturity of these
bonds may not exceed 10 years, and there is no aggregate
limit for this security type. Corporate bonds from individual
issuers with investment-grade ratings, at the time of purchase,
below the top three ratings are limited to the lesser of 1% of
our total assets or 15% of our tier-one risk-based capital and
must have a maturity of less than one year. Aggregate holdings
of this security type cannot exceed 5% of our total assets.
Bonds that subsequently experience a decline in credit rating
below investment grade are monitored at least monthly.
17
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and estimated
fair value of our
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios (excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York common stock) at the dates indicated. As of
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, we also had a trading
portfolio with a market value of $3.4 million,
$2.5 million and $3.6 million, respectively,
consisting of mutual funds quoted in actively traded markets.
These securities are utilized to fund non-qualified deferred
compensation obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
404,128
|
|
|
$
|
418,060
|
|
|
$
|
532,870
|
|
|
$
|
546,244
|
|
|
$
|
491,758
|
|
|
$
|
486,562
|
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
65,363
|
|
|
|
62,466
|
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
|
|
55,778
|
|
|
|
29,200
|
|
|
|
28,867
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
344,150
|
|
|
|
349,088
|
|
|
|
242,557
|
|
|
|
245,492
|
|
|
|
171,709
|
|
|
|
171,207
|
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
111,756
|
|
|
|
114,194
|
|
|
|
90,446
|
|
|
|
83,695
|
|
|
|
36,141
|
|
|
|
36,522
|
|
Equity investments(1)
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
14,427
|
|
|
|
14,412
|
|
GSE bonds bonds
|
|
|
28,994
|
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
134,595
|
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
65,146
|
|
|
|
65,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
1,110,806
|
|
|
$
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
$
|
957,257
|
|
|
$
|
957,585
|
|
|
$
|
808,381
|
|
|
$
|
802,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists primarily of money market mutual funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
$
|
6,273
|
|
|
$
|
9,206
|
|
|
$
|
9,320
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
10,480
|
|
|
|
10,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
6,740
|
|
|
$
|
6,930
|
|
|
$
|
14,479
|
|
|
$
|
14,588
|
|
|
$
|
19,686
|
|
|
$
|
19,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The
composition and maturities of the investment securities
portfolio at December 31, 2009, are summarized in the
following table. Maturities are based on the final contractual
payment dates, and do not reflect the effect of scheduled
principal repayments, prepayments, or early redemptions that may
occur. All of our securities at December 31, 2009, were
taxable securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less
|
|
|
More than One Year through Five Years
|
|
|
More than Five Years through Ten Years
|
|
|
More than Ten Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
142,833
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
189,552
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
%
|
|
$
|
71,743
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
404,128
|
|
|
$
|
418,060
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
%
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
25,256
|
|
|
|
5.02
|
%
|
|
|
40,107
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
|
65,363
|
|
|
|
62,466
|
|
|
|
5.07
|
%
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
139,729
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
50,052
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
|
150,402
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
|
344,150
|
|
|
|
349,088
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
%
|
Non-GSEs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
91,076
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
|
|
20,680
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
|
|
111,756
|
|
|
|
114,194
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
28,994
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
28,994
|
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
12,294
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
122,301
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
134,595
|
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
38,081
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
$
|
433,857
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
$
|
355,936
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
282,932
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,110,806
|
|
|
$
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSEs
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,740
|
|
|
$
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
3.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of Funds
General. Deposits traditionally have been our
primary source of funds for our investment and lending
activities. We also borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
New York and other financial institutions to supplement cash
flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for
interest rate risk management purposes, and to manage our cost
of funds. Our additional sources of funds are the proceeds of
loan sales, scheduled loan payments, maturing investments, loan
prepayments, and retained income on other earning assets.
Deposits. We accept deposits primarily from
the areas in which our offices are located. We rely on our
convenient locations, customer service, and competitive products
and pricing to attract and retain deposits. We offer a variety
of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms.
Our deposit accounts consist of transaction accounts (NOW and
non-interest bearing checking accounts), savings accounts (money
market, passbook, and statement savings), and certificates of
deposit, including individual retirement accounts. We accept
brokered deposits on a limited basis. At December 31, 2009,
we had brokered certificates of deposits totaling
$54.8 million.
Interest rates offered generally are established weekly, while
maturity terms, service fees, and withdrawal penalties are
reviewed on a periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based
primarily on current operating strategies and market interest
rates, liquidity requirements, and our deposit growth goals.
At December 31, 2009, we had a total of $579.4 million
in certificates of deposit, of which $518.0 million had
remaining maturities of one year or less. Based on our
experience and current pricing strategy, we believe we will
retain a significant portion of these accounts at maturity.
19
The following tables set forth the distribution of our average
total deposit accounts, by account type, for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand
|
|
$
|
99,950
|
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
94,499
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
NOW
|
|
|
51,336
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
63,512
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
157,620
|
|
|
|
13.40
|
|
|
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
64,444
|
|
|
|
7.10
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
357,938
|
|
|
|
30.43
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
317,426
|
|
|
|
34.97
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
509,610
|
|
|
|
43.31
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
367,806
|
|
|
|
40.52
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,176,454
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.55
|
%
|
|
$
|
907,687
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand
|
|
$
|
96,796
|
|
|
|
9.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
NOW
|
|
|
46,436
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
401,003
|
|
|
|
39.64
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
464,552
|
|
|
|
45.92
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,011,560
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate amount of our
outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or
equal to $100,000 was $276.5 million. The following table
sets forth the maturity of these certificates at
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
156,626
|
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
|
67,854
|
|
Over six months through one year
|
|
|
24,538
|
|
Over one year to three years
|
|
|
10,314
|
|
Over three years
|
|
|
17,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
276,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings. Our borrowings consist primarily
of securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements) with third party financial institutions, as well as
advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and the
Federal Reserve Bank. As of December 31, 2009, our
repurchase agreements totaled $200.0 million, or 12.4% of
total liabilities, capitalized lease obligations totaled
$2.1 million, or 0.13% of total liabilities, overnight
borrowings totaled $6.0 million, or 0.37% of total
liabilities, and our Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled
$71.3 million, or 4.4% of total liabilities. At
December 31, 2009, we had the ability to borrow an
additional $194.0 million under our existing credit
facilities with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.
Repurchase agreements are primarily secured by mortgage-backed
securities. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
are secured by our investment in the common stock of the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York as well by pledged mortgage-backed
securities.
20
The following table sets forth information concerning balances
and interest rates on our borrowings at and for the years
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
279,424
|
|
|
$
|
332,084
|
|
|
$
|
124,420
|
|
Average balance during year
|
|
$
|
297,365
|
|
|
$
|
277,227
|
|
|
$
|
127,926
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end
|
|
$
|
345,506
|
|
|
$
|
382,107
|
|
|
$
|
156,459
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
Average interest rate during year
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, we had 208 full-time
employees and 30 part-time employees. Our employees are not
represented by any collective bargaining group. Management
believes that we have a good working relationship with our
employees.
Subsidiary
Activities
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. owns 100% of Northfield Investment,
Inc., an inactive New Jersey investment company, and 100% of
Northfield Bank. Northfield Bank owns 100% of NSB Services
Corp., a Delaware corporation, which in turn owns 100% of the
voting common stock of NSB Realty Trust. NSB Realty Trust is a
Maryland real estate investment trust that holds mortgage loans,
mortgage-backed securities and other investments. These entities
enable us to segregate certain assets for management purposes,
and promote our ability to raise regulatory capital in the
future through the sale of preferred stock or other
capital-enhancing securities or borrow against assets or stock
of these entities for liquidity purposes. At December 31,
2009, Northfield Banks investment in NSB Services Corp.
was $575.8 million, and NSB Services Corp. had assets of
$576.0 million and liabilities of $132,000 at that date. At
December 31, 2009, NSB Services Corp.s investment in
NSB Realty Trust was $577.1 million, and NSB Realty Trust
had $577.1 million in assets, and liabilities of $15,000 at
that date. NSB Insurance Agency, Inc. is a New York corporation
that receives nominal commissions from the sale of life
insurance by employees of Northfield Bank. At December 31,
2009, Northfield Banks investment in NSB Insurance Agency
was $1,000.
SUPERVISION
AND REGULATION
General
Northfield Bank is examined and supervised by the Office of
Thrift Supervision and also is subject to examination by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and
supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities
in which an institution may engage and is intended primarily for
the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporations deposit insurance fund and the
institutions depositors. Under this system of federal
regulation, financial institutions are periodically examined to
ensure that they satisfy applicable standards with respect to
capital adequacy, asset quality, management, earnings,
liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk. Following completion
of its examination, the federal agency critiques the
institutions operations and assigns its rating (known as
an institutions CAMELS rating). Under federal law, an
institution may not disclose its CAMELS rating to the public.
Northfield Bank also is regulated to a lesser extent by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, governing
reserves to be maintained against deposits and other matters.
The Office of Thrift Supervision examines Northfield Bank and
prepares reports of its findings for the consideration of its
board of directors. Northfield Banks relationship with its
depositors and borrowers also is regulated to a great extent by
federal law and, to a much lesser extent, state law, especially
in matters concerning the ownership of deposit accounts and the
form and content of Northfield Banks loan documents.
21
Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision,
or Congress, could have a material adverse effect on Northfield
Bancorp, Inc., Northfield Bank, and their operations.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC, are
savings and loan holding companies, and are required to file
certain reports with, be examined by, and otherwise comply with
the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. also is subject to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
federal securities laws.
Certain of the regulatory requirements that are or will be
applicable to Northfield Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc., and
Northfield Bancorp, MHC are described below. This description of
statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete
explanation of such statutes and regulations and their effect on
Northfield Bank, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield
Bancorp, MHC and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the actual statutes and regulations.
Proposed
Federal Legislation
Legislation has been proposed that would implement sweeping
changes to the current bank regulatory structure, including
eliminating our current primary federal regulator, the Office of
Thrift Supervision, by merging the Office of Thrift Supervision
into the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal
regulator for national banks). The proposed legislation would
also establish a Financial Services Oversight Council and grant
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System exclusive
authority to regulate all bank and thrift holding companies. As
a result, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC
would become bank holding companies subject to supervision by
the Federal Reserve Board as opposed to the Office of Thrift
Supervision, and would become subject to the Federal
Reserves regulations, including holding company capital
requirements which differ from those applicable to Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC as savings and loan
holding companies. In addition, compliance with new regulations
and being supervised by one or more new regulatory agencies
could increase our expenses.
Federal
Banking Regulation
Business Activities. A federal savings bank
derives its lending and investment powers from the Home
Owners Loan Act, as amended, and the regulations of the
Office of Thrift Supervision. Under these laws and regulations,
Northfield Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by one- to
four-residential real estate without limitation as a percentage
of assets, and may invest in non-residential real estate loans
up to 400% of capital in the aggregate, commercial business
loans up to 20% of assets in the aggregate and consumer loans up
to 35% of assets in the aggregate, and in certain types of debt
securities and certain other assets. Northfield Bank also may
establish subsidiaries that may engage in activities not
otherwise permissible for Northfield Bank, including real estate
investment, and securities and insurance brokerage.
Capital Requirements. Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations require savings banks to meet three
minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital ratio, a 4%
(core) capital ratio, and an 8% total risk-based capital ratio.
The risk-based capital standard for savings banks requires the
maintenance of total capital (which is defined as core capital
and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least
8%. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all
assets, including certain off-balance sheet obligations, are
multiplied by a risk-weight factor assigned by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, based on the risks believed inherent in the
type of asset. Core capital is defined as common
stockholders equity (including retained earnings), certain
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and
minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated
subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain mortgage
servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components
of supplementary capital currently include cumulative preferred
stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory
convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate
preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease losses
(limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets) and up
to 45% of net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
equity securities with readily determinable fair values.
Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of
total capital cannot exceed 100% of core
22
capital. Additionally, a savings bank that retains credit risk
in connection with an asset sale may be required to maintain
additional regulatory capital because of the possible recourse
to the savings bank.
At December 31, 2009, Northfield Banks capital
exceeded all applicable requirements.
Loans-to-One
Borrower. Generally, a federal savings bank may
not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of
borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. An
additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired
capital and surplus, if the loan is secured by readily
marketable collateral, which generally does not include real
estate. As of December 31, 2009, Northfield Banks
largest lending relationship with a single or related group of
borrowers totaled $17.8 million, which represented 6.5% of
unimpaired capital and surplus. Therefore, Northfield Bank was
in compliance with the
loans-to-one
borrower limitations at December 31, 2009.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. As a federal
savings bank, Northfield Bank must satisfy the qualified thrift
lender, or QTL, test. Under the QTL test, Northfield
Bank must maintain at least 65% of its portfolio
assets in qualified thrift investments
(primarily residential mortgages and related investments,
including mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months of
the most recent
12-month
period. Portfolio assets generally means total
assets of a savings institution, less the sum of specified
liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, goodwill and other
intangible assets, and the value of property used in the conduct
of the savings banks business.
A savings bank that fails the qualified thrift lender test must
either convert to a bank charter or operate under specified
restrictions. At December 31, 2009, Northfield Bank
maintained approximately 77.6% of its portfolio assets in
qualified thrift investments and, therefore, satisfied the QTL
test.
Capital Distributions. Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations govern capital distributions by a
federal savings bank, including cash dividends, stock
repurchases, and other transactions charged to the capital
account. A savings bank must file an application for approval of
a capital distribution if:
|
|
|
|
|
the total capital distributions for the applicable calendar year
exceed the sum of the savings banks net income for that
year to date plus the savings banks retained net income
for the preceding two years;
|
|
|
|
the savings bank would not be at least adequately capitalized
following the distribution;
|
|
|
|
the distribution would violate any applicable statute,
regulation, agreement, or Office of Thrift Supervision-imposed
condition; or
|
|
|
|
the savings bank is not eligible for expedited treatment of its
application or notice filings.
|
Even if an application is not otherwise required, every savings
bank that is a subsidiary of a holding company must still file a
notice with the Office of Thrift Supervision at least
30 days before the board of directors declares a dividend
or approves a capital distribution.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may disapprove a notice or
application if:
|
|
|
|
|
the savings bank would be undercapitalized following the
distribution;
|
|
|
|
the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness
concerns; or
|
|
|
|
the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained
in any statute, regulation, or agreement.
|
In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an
insured depository institution shall not make any capital
distribution if, after making such distribution, the institution
would be undercapitalized.
Liquidity. A federal savings bank is required
to maintain a sufficient amount of liquidity to ensure its safe
and sound operation. We seek to maintain a ratio of liquid
assets not subject to pledge as a percentage of deposits and
borrowings not subject to pledge of 35% or greater. At
December 31, 2009, this ratio was 70.83%.
Assessments. The Office of Thrift Supervision
charges assessments to recover the costs of examining savings
banks and their affiliates. These assessments are based on three
components: the size of the savings
23
bank on which the basic assessment is based; the savings
banks supervisory condition, which results in an
additional assessment based on a percentage of the basic
assessment for any savings bank with a composite rating of 3, 4,
or 5 in its most recent safety and soundness examination; and
the complexity of the banks operations. For 2009, the
Companys combined assessment was $336,000.
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending
Laws. All Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insured institutions have a responsibility under the Community
Reinvestment Act and related regulations of the Office of Thrift
Supervision to help meet the credit needs of their communities,
including low- and moderate-income areas. Further, in connection
with its examination of a federal savings bank, the Office of
Thrift Supervision is required to assess the savings banks
record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. In
addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing
Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending
practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those
statutes. A savings banks failure to comply with the
provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could, at a
minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications such
as branches or mergers, or in restrictions on its activities.
The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and
the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the
Office of Thrift Supervision, as well as other federal
regulatory agencies including the Department of Justice.
Northfield Bank received a satisfactory Community Reinvestment
Act rating in its most recent examination conducted by the
Office of Thrift Supervision.
Transactions with Related Parties. A federal
savings banks authority to engage in transactions with its
affiliates is limited by Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations and by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act and its implementing Regulation W. An affiliate
is a company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with an insured depository institution such as
Northfield Bank. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is an affiliate of
Northfield Bank. In general, loan transactions between an
insured depository institution and its affiliates are subject to
certain quantitative and collateral requirements. In this
regard, transactions between an insured depository institution
and its affiliates are limited to 10% of the institutions
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus for transactions with
any one affiliate and 20% of unimpaired capital and unimpaired
surplus for transactions in the aggregate with all affiliates.
Collateral in specified amounts ranging from 100% to 130% of the
amount of the transaction must usually be provided by affiliates
in order to receive loans from the savings bank. In addition,
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit a savings bank
from lending to any of its affiliates that are engaged in
activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies,
and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other than
a subsidiary. Finally, transactions with affiliates must be
consistent with safe and sound banking practices, not involve
low-quality assets, and be on terms that are as favorable to the
institution as comparable transactions with non-affiliates. The
Office of Thrift Supervision requires savings banks to maintain
detailed records of all transactions with affiliates.
Northfield Banks authority to extend credit to its
directors, executive officers, and principal stockholders, as
well as to entities controlled by such persons, is governed by
the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal
Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal Reserve Board.
Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of
credit to insiders:
(i) be made on terms that are substantially the same as,
and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less
stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions
with unaffiliated persons, and that do not involve more than the
normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable
features; and
(ii) not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit
extended to such persons, individually and in the aggregate,
which limits are based, in part, on the amount of Northfield
Banks capital.
In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits to
any director, executive officer, or principal stockholder must
be approved by Northfield Banks board of directors.
Section 402 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
prohibits the extension of personal loans to directors and
executive officers of issuers (as defined by in Sarbanes-Oxley).
The prohibition, however, does not apply to any loans made or
maintained by an insured depository institution, such as
Northfield Bank, that is subject to the insider lending
restrictions of the Federal Reserve Act and other applicable
rules and regulations.
24
Enforcement. The Office of Thrift Supervision
has primary enforcement responsibility over federal savings
institutions and has the authority to bring enforcement action
against all institution-affiliated parties,
including stockholders, attorneys, appraisers, and accountants
who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful actions
likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution.
Formal enforcement action by the Office of Thrift Supervision
may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and
desist order, to removal of officers or directors of the
institution and the appointment of a receiver or conservator.
Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and actions,
and range up to $25,000 per day, unless a finding of reckless
disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as
$1 million per day. The Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation also has the authority to terminate deposit
insurance or to recommend to the Director of the Office of
Thrift Supervision that enforcement action be taken with respect
to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by
the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has
authority to take actions under specified circumstances.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal
law requires each federal banking agency to prescribe certain
standards for all insured depository institutions. These
standards relate to, among other things, internal controls,
information systems and audit systems, loan documentation,
credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth,
compensation, and other operational and managerial standards as
the agency deems appropriate. The federal banking agencies
adopted Interagency Guidelines Prescribing Standards for Safety
and Soundness to implement the safety and soundness standards
required under federal law. The guidelines set forth the safety
and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to
identify and address problems at insured depository institutions
before capital becomes impaired. If the appropriate federal
banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any
standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require
the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to
achieve compliance with the standard. If an institution fails to
meet these standards, the appropriate federal banking agency may
require the institution to submit a compliance plan.
Prompt Corrective Action Regulations. Under
the prompt corrective action regulations, the Office of Thrift
Supervision is required and authorized to take supervisory
actions against undercapitalized savings banks. For this
purpose, a savings bank is placed in one of the following five
categories based on the savings banks capital:
|
|
|
|
|
well-capitalized (at least 5% (core) capital, 6% Tier 1
risk-based capital and 10% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
adequately capitalized (at least 4% leverage capital, 4%
Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1
risk-based capital or 8% total risk-based capital);
|
|
|
|
significantly undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital,
3% Tier 1 risk-based capital or 6% total risk-based
capital); and
|
|
|
|
critically undercapitalized (less than 2% tangible capital).
|
Generally, the banking regulator is required to appoint a
receiver or conservator for a savings bank that is
critically undercapitalized within specific time
frames. The regulations also provide that a capital restoration
plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision within
45 days of the date a savings bank receives notice that it
is undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized, or critically
undercapitalized. The criteria for an acceptable capital
restoration plan include, among other things, the establishment
of the methodology and assumptions for attaining adequately
capitalized status on an annual basis, procedures for ensuring
compliance with restrictions imposed by applicable federal
regulations, the identification of the types and levels of
activities the savings bank will engage in while the capital
restoration plan is in effect, and assurances that the capital
restoration plan will not appreciably increase the current risk
profile of the savings bank. Any holding company for the savings
bank required to submit a capital restoration plan must
guarantee the lesser of an amount equal to 5% of the savings
banks assets at the time it was notified or deemed to be
undercapitalized by the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the
amount necessary to restore the savings bank to
25
adequately capitalized status. This guarantee remains in place
until the Office of Thrift Supervision notifies the savings bank
that it has maintained adequately capitalized status for each of
four consecutive calendar quarters, and the Office of Thrift
Supervision has the authority to require payment and collect
payment under the guarantee. Failure by a holding company to
provide the required guarantee will result in certain operating
restrictions on the savings bank, such as restrictions on the
ability to declare and pay dividends, pay executive compensation
and management fees, and increase assets or expand operations.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may also take any one of a
number of discretionary supervisory actions against
undercapitalized associations, including the issuance of a
capital directive and the replacement of senior executive
officers and directors.
At December 31, 2009, Northfield Bank met the criteria for
being considered well-capitalized.
Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve
System requires all depository institutions to maintain
noninterest-bearing reserves at specified levels against their
checking, NOW and Super NOW checking accounts and non-personal
time deposits. The balances maintained to meet the reserve
requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve System may be used
to satisfy the Office of Thrift Supervision liquidity
requirements.
Savings institutions have authority to borrow from the Federal
Reserve System discount window. Northfield Bank
maintains a primary credit facility at the Federal
Reserves discount window. Northfield Bank had no
borrowings from the Federal Reserves discount window as of
December 31, 2009.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. In October
2008, deposit insurance by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation was increased to a maximum of $250,000 per
depositor. On January 1, 2014, the maximum insurance amount
will return to $100,000 per depositor for all deposit accounts
except certain retirement accounts, which will remain at
$250,000 per depositor. In addition, under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporations Transaction Account Guarantee
Program, most of our non-interest-bearing transaction accounts
are guaranteed regardless of amount until June 30, 2010.
Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005
(the Reform Act), the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the
Deposit Insurance Fund annually at between 1.15% and 1.5% of
estimated insured deposits. As of June 30, 2008, the
reserve ratio had decreased to 1.01% as a result of bank
failures. As part of a plan to restore the reserve ratio to
1.15%, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation imposed a
special assessment equal to five basis points of assets less
Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, which was payable
on September 30, 2009. In addition, the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation has increased its quarterly deposit
insurance assessment rates and amended the method by which rates
are calculated. Beginning in the second quarter of 2009,
institutions are assigned an initial base assessment rate
ranging from 12 to 45 basis points of deposits depending on
risk category. The initial base assessment is then adjusted
based upon the level of unsecured debt, secured liabilities, and
brokered deposits to establish a total base assessment rate
ranging from seven to 77.5 basis points.
On November 12, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation approved a final rule requiring insured depository
institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, their
estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth
quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. Estimated
assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010
are based upon the assessment rate in effect on
September 30, 2009, with three basis points added for the
2011 and 2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual growth
in the assessment base is assumed. Prepaid assessments are to be
applied against the actual quarterly assessments until
exhausted, and may not be applied to any special assessments
that may occur in the future. Any unused prepayments will be
returned to the institution on June 30, 2013. On
December 30, 2009, we prepaid $5.7 million in
estimated assessment fees for the fourth quarter of 2009 through
2012. Because the prepaid assessments represent the prepayment
of future expense, they do not affect our regulatory capital
(the prepaid asset will have a risk-weighting of 0%) or current
tax obligations.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation upon a finding that an institution has
engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or
unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any
applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by
the Federal
26
Deposit Insurance Corporation. We do not currently know of any
practice, condition, or violation that may lead to termination
of our deposit insurance.
In addition to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
assessments, the Financing Corporation (FICO) is
authorized to impose and collect, with the approval of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, assessments for
anticipated payments, issuance costs and custodial fees on bonds
issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the former
Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. The bonds issued
by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For the
quarter ended December 31, 2009, the annualized FICO
assessment was equal to 1.06 basis points for each $100 in
domestic deposits maintained at an institution.
Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program
The Bank participates in the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporations Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program which
provides full federal deposit insurance coverage for
non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, regardless of
dollar amount, until June 30, 2010. Beginning
January 1, 2010, the fees will be based on the
institutions risk category rating assigned with respect to
regular Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments.
Institutions in Risk Category I (generally well-capitalized
institutions with composite CAMELS 1 or 2 ratings) will pay an
annualized assessment rate of 15 basis points. Institutions
in Risk Category II (generally adequately capitalized
institutions with composite CAMELS 3 or better) will pay an
annualized assessment rate of 20 basis points. Institutions
in Risk Category III or IV (generally under
capitalized or composite CAMELS 4 or 5) will pay an
annualized assessment rate of 25 basis points.
Federal
Home Loan Bank System
Northfield Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks.
The Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit
facility primarily for member institutions. As a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, Northfield Bank is required
to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home
Loan Bank of New York in an amount determined by a
membership investment component and an
activity-based investment component. The membership
investment component is the greater of 0.20% of an
institutions Mortgage-related Assets, as
defined by the Federal Home Loan Bank, or $1,000. The
activity-based investment component is equal to 4.5% of the
institutions outstanding advances with the Federal Home
Loan Bank. The activity-based investment component also
considers other transactions, including assets originated for or
sold to the Federal Home Loan Bank and delivery commitments
issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank. Northfield Bank currently
does not enter into these other types of transactions with the
Federal Home Loan Bank. As of December 31, 2009, Northfield
Bank was in compliance with its ownership requirement. At
December 31, 2009, Northfield Bank held $6.4 million
of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York common stock.
Overdraft
Fees
New restrictions mandated by the Federal Reserve Board under
Regulation E are currently set to take effect July 1,
2010. These restrictions will prohibit overdraft fees on ATM
withdrawals or signature debit transactions unless consumers
voluntarily opt in for overdraft protection. We are currently
assessing the impact of the new regulation on future earnings.
However, we expect compliance with this new regulation to reduce
our non-interest income.
Other
Regulations
Some interest and other charges collected or contracted by
Northfield Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws
concerning interest rates and charges. Northfield Banks
operations also are subject to federal laws applicable to credit
transactions, such as the:
|
|
|
|
|
Truth-In-Lending
Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers
for mortgage loans for one- to four-family residential real
estate receive various disclosures, including good faith
estimates of settlement
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
costs, lender servicing and escrow account practices, and
prohibiting certain practices that increase the cost of
settlement services;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions
to provide information to enable the public and public officials
to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its
obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it
serves;
|
|
|
|
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the
basis of race, creed, or other prohibited factors in extending
credit;
|
|
|
|
Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of
information to credit reporting agencies;
|
|
|
|
Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer
debts may be collected by collection agencies; and
|
|
|
|
Rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged
with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.
|
The operations of Northfield Bank also are subject to the:
|
|
|
|
|
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain
confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes
procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of
financial records;
|
|
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated
thereunder, that govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals
from deposit accounts and customers rights and liabilities
arising from the use of automated teller machines and other
electronic banking services;
|
|
|
|
Title III of The Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001 (referred to as the USA PATRIOT
Act), which significantly expanded the responsibilities of
financial institutions, in preventing the use of the United
States financial system to fund terrorist activities. Among
other things, the USA PATRIOT Act and the related regulations of
the Office of Thrift Supervision require savings banks operating
in the United States to develop anti-money laundering
compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to
ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such
required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing
compliance requirements, also applicable to financial
institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of
Foreign Assets Control Regulations; and
|
|
|
|
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the
sharing of consumer financial information by financial
institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions
offering financial products or services to retail customers to
provide such customers with the financial institutions
privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to
opt out of the sharing of certain personal financial
information with unaffiliated third parties, if the financial
institution customarily shares such information.
|
Holding
Company Regulation
General. Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. are non-diversified savings and loan
holding companies within the meaning of the Home Owners
Loan Act. As such, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. are registered with the Office of Thrift
Supervision and subject to Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations, examinations, supervision, and reporting
requirements. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has
enforcement authority over Northfield Bancorp, MHC and
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and their subsidiaries. Among other
things, this authority permits the Office of Thrift Supervision
to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a
serious risk to the subsidiary savings institution. As federal
corporations, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. generally are not subject to state business organization
laws.
28
Permitted Activities. Pursuant to
Section 10(o) of the Home Owners Loan Act and Office
of Thrift Supervision regulations and policy, a mutual holding
company and a federally chartered mid-tier holding company, such
as Northfield Bancorp, Inc., may engage in the following
activities:
(i) investing in the stock of a savings bank;
(ii) acquiring a mutual association through the merger of
such association into a savings bank subsidiary of such holding
company or an interim savings bank subsidiary of such holding
company;
(iii) merging with or acquiring another holding company,
one of whose subsidiaries is a savings bank;
(iv) investing in a corporation, the capital stock of which
is available for purchase by a savings bank under federal law or
under the law of any state where the subsidiary savings bank or
association share their home offices;
(v) furnishing or performing management services for a
savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(vi) holding, managing, or liquidating assets owned or
acquired from a savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(vii) holding or managing properties used or occupied by a
savings bank subsidiary of such company;
(viii) acting as trustee under deeds of trust;
(ix) any other activity:
(a) that the Federal Reserve Board, by regulation, has
determined to be permissible for bank holding companies under
Section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
unless the Director, by regulation, prohibits or limits any such
activity for savings and loan holding companies; or
(b) in which multiple savings and loan holding companies
were authorized (by regulation) to directly engage on
March 5, 1987;
(x) any activity permissible for financial holding
companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company
Act, including securities and insurance underwriting; and
(xi) purchasing, holding, or disposing of stock acquired in
connection with a qualified stock issuance if the purchase of
such stock by such savings and loan holding company is approved
by the Director.
(xii) If a mutual holding company acquires or merges with
another holding company, the holding company acquired or the
holding company resulting from such merger or acquisition may
only invest in assets and engage in activities listed in
(i) through (x) above, and has a period of two years
to cease any nonconforming activities and divest any
nonconforming investments.
The Home Owners Loan Act prohibits a savings and loan
holding company, including Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, directly or indirectly, or through one
or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of another
savings institution or holding company thereof, without prior
written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. It also
prohibits the acquisition or retention of, with certain
exceptions, more than 5% of a nonsubsidiary company engaged in
activities other than those permitted by the Home Owners
Loan Act or acquiring or retaining control of an institution
that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by
holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Office of
Thrift Supervision must consider the financial and managerial
resources, future prospects of the company and institution
involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the
federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the
community and competitive factors.
29
The Office of Thrift Supervision is prohibited from approving
any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan
holding company controlling savings institutions in more than
one state, subject to two exceptions:
(i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by
savings and loan holding companies; and
(ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in another
state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution
specifically permit such acquisition.
The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate
savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
Activities Restrictions. The
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999,
or GLBA, provides that no company may acquire control of a
savings association after May 4, 1999, unless it engages
only in the financial activities permitted for financial holding
companies under the law or for multiple savings and loan holding
companies as described below. Upon any non-supervisory
acquisition by Northfield Bancorp of another savings association
as a separate subsidiary, Northfield Bancorp would become a
multiple savings and loan holding company and would be limited
to activities permitted multiple holding companies by Office of
Thrift Supervision regulation. The Office of Thrift Supervision
has issued an interpretation concluding that multiple savings
holding companies may also engage in activities permitted for
financial holding companies, including lending, trust services,
insurance activities and underwriting, investment banking, and
real estate investments.
Mergers and Acquisitions. Northfield Bancorp
must obtain approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision
before acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another
savings institution or savings and loan holding company or
acquiring such an institution or holding company by merger,
consolidation, or purchase of its assets. In evaluating an
application for Northfield Bancorp to acquire control of a
savings institution, the Office of Thrift Supervision would
consider the financial and managerial resources and future
prospects of Northfield Bancorp and the target institution, the
effect of the acquisition on the risk to the Deposit Insurance
Fund, the convenience and the needs of the community, and
competitive factors.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may not approve any acquisition
that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company
controlling savings institutions in more than one state, subject
to two exceptions; (i) the approval of interstate
supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies
and (ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in
another state if the laws of the state of the target savings
institution specifically permit such acquisitions. The states
vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and
loan holding company acquisitions.
Waivers of Dividends by Northfield Bancorp,
MHC. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations
require Northfield Bancorp, MHC to notify the Office of Thrift
Supervision of any proposed waiver of its receipt of dividends
from Northfield Bancorp, Inc. The Office of Thrift Supervision
reviews dividend waiver notices on a
case-by-case
basis, and, in general, does not object to any such waiver if:
(i) the waiver would not be detrimental to the safe and
sound operation of the subsidiary savings bank; and
(ii) the mutual holding companys board of directors
determines that such waiver is consistent with such
directors fiduciary duties to the mutual holding
companys members. Northfield Bancorp, MHC waived
approximately $3.9 million in dividends declared in 2009.
Conversion of Northfield Bancorp, MHC to Stock
Form. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations
permit Northfield Bancorp, MHC to convert from the mutual form
of organization to the capital stock form of organization. There
can be no assurance when, if ever, a conversion transaction will
occur, and the board of directors has no current intention or
plan to undertake a conversion transaction. In a conversion
transaction, a new stock holding company would be formed as the
successor to Northfield Bancorp, Inc., Northfield Bancorp,
MHCs corporate existence would end, and certain depositors
of Northfield Bank would receive the right to subscribe for
additional shares of the new holding company. In a conversion
transaction, each share of common stock held by stockholders
other than Northfield Bancorp, MHC would be automatically
converted
30
into a number of shares of common stock of the new holding
company determined pursuant to an exchange ratio that ensures
that stockholders other than Northfield Bancorp, MHC own the
same percentage of common stock in the new holding company as
they owned in Northfield Bancorp, Inc. immediately prior to the
conversion transaction, subject to adjustment for any assets
held by Northfield Bancorp, MHC. Any such transaction would
require the approval of our stockholders, including, under
current Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, stockholders
other than Northfield Bancorp, Inc., as well as depositors of
Northfield Bank.
Liquidation Rights. Each depositor of
Northfield Bank has both a deposit account in Northfield Bank
and a pro rata ownership interest in the net worth of Northfield
Bancorp, MHC based on the deposit balance in his or her account.
This ownership interest is tied to the depositors account
and has no tangible market value separate from the deposit
account. This interest may only be realized in the unlikely
event of a complete liquidation of Northfield Bank. Any
depositor who opens a deposit account obtains a pro rata
ownership interest in Northfield Bancorp, MHC without any
additional payment beyond the amount of the deposit. A depositor
who reduces or closes his or her account receives a portion or
all, respectively, of the balance in the deposit account but
nothing for his or her ownership interest in the net worth of
Northfield Bancorp, MHC, which is lost to the extent that the
balance in the account is reduced or closed.
In the unlikely event of a complete liquidation of Northfield
Bank, all claims of creditors of Northfield Bank, including
those of depositors of Northfield Bank (to the extent of their
deposit balances), would be paid first. Thereafter, if there
were any assets of Northfield Bank remaining, these assets would
be distributed to Northfield Bancorp, Inc. as Northfield
Banks sole stockholder. Then, if there were any assets of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. remaining, depositors of Northfield
Bank would receive those remaining assets, pro rata, based upon
the deposit balances in their deposit account in Northfield Bank
immediately prior to liquidation.
Federal
Securities Laws
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s common stock is registered with
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is
subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading
restrictions, and other requirements under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues,
corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive
compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate
information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer will be required
to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by
the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act have several requirements, including having these officers
certify that: (i) they are responsible for establishing,
maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting; (ii) they have
made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee
of the board of directors about our internal control over
financial reporting; and (iii) they have included
information in our quarterly and annual reports about their
evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal
control over financial reporting or in other factors that could
materially affect internal control over financial reporting.
31
TAXATION
Federal
Taxation
General. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
Northfield Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the
same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions
discussed below. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank
are part of a consolidated tax group and file consolidated tax
returns including Northfield Banks wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Northfield Bancorp, MHC does not own at least 80%
of the common stock of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and therefore
files a separate federal tax return.
Northfield Bancorp, Incs consolidated federal tax returns
are not currently under audit, and have not been audited during
the past five years. The following discussion of federal
taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal
income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the
tax rules applicable to Northfield Bancorp, MHC, Northfield
Bancorp, Inc., or Northfield Bank.
Method of Accounting. For federal income tax
purposes, Northfield Bancorp, MHC reports its income and
expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year
ending December 31 for filing its federal and state income tax
returns.
Bad Debt Reserves. Historically, Northfield
Bank was subject to special provisions in the tax law applicable
to qualifying savings banks regarding allowable tax bad debt
deductions and related reserves. Tax law changes were enacted in
1996 that eliminated the ability of savings banks to use the
percentage of taxable income method for computing tax bad debt
reserves for tax years after 1995, and required recapture into
taxable income over a six-year period of all bad debt reserves
accumulated after a savings banks last tax year beginning
before January 1, 1988. Northfield Bank recaptured its post
December 31, 1987, bad-debt reserve balance over the
six-year period ended December 31, 2004.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is required to use the specific charge
off method to account for tax bad debt deductions.
Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to
1996, bad debt reserves created prior to 1988 were subject to
recapture into taxable income if Northfield Bank failed to meet
certain thrift asset and definitional tests or made certain
distributions. Tax law changes in 1996 eliminated thrift-related
recapture rules. However, under current law, pre-1988 tax bad
debt reserves remain subject to recapture if Northfield Bank
makes certain non-dividend distributions, repurchases any of its
common stock, pays dividends in excess of earnings and profits,
or fails to qualify as a bank for tax purposes.
At December 31, 2009, the total federal pre-base year bad
debt reserve of Northfield Bank was approximately
$5.9 million.
Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum tax at
a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain
tax preferences, less any available exemption. The alternative
minimum tax is imposed to the extent it exceeds the regular
income tax. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of
alternative taxable income. Certain payments of alternative
minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax
liabilities in future years. Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s
consolidated group has not been subject to the alternative
minimum tax and has no such amounts available as credits for
carryover.
Net Operating Loss Carryovers. A financial
institution may carry back net operating losses to the preceding
two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable
years. At December 31, 2009, Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
consolidated group had no net operating loss carryforwards for
federal income tax purposes.
Corporate Dividends-Received
Deduction. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. may exclude
from its federal taxable income 100% of dividends received from
Northfield Bank as a wholly-owned subsidiary by filing
consolidated tax returns. The corporate dividends-received
deduction is 80% when the corporation receiving the dividend
owns at least 20% of the stock of the distributing corporation.
The dividends-received deduction is 70% when the corporation
receiving the dividend owns less than 20% of the distributing
corporation.
32
State/City
Taxation
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a
calendar year basis to New York State. New York State franchise
tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater
of (a) 7.1% (for 2007 and forward) of entire net
income allocable to New York State, (b) 3% of
alternative entire net income allocable to New York
State, or (c) 0.01% of the average value of assets
allocable to New York State plus nominal minimum tax of $250 per
company. Entire net income is based on federal taxable income,
subject to certain modifications. Alternative entire net income
is equal to entire net income without certain modifications.
Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bank report income on a
calendar year basis to New York City. New York City franchise
tax on corporations is imposed in an amount equal to the greater
of (a) 9.0% of entire net income allocable to
New York State, (b) 3% of alternative entire net
income allocable to New York City, or (c) 0.01% of
the average value of assets allocable to New York City plus
nominal minimum tax of $250 per company. Entire net income is
based on federal taxable income, subject to certain
modifications. Alternative entire net income is equal to entire
net income without certain modifications.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank file New Jersey
Corporation Business Tax returns on a calendar year basis.
Generally, the income derived from New Jersey sources is subject
to New Jersey tax. Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bank
pay the greater of the corporate business tax (CBT)
at 9% of taxable income or the minimum tax of $1,200 per entity.
At December 31, 2005, Northfield Bank did not meet the
definition of a domestic building and loan association for New
York State and City tax purposes. As a result, we were required
to recognize a $2.2 million deferred tax liability for
state and city thrift-related base-year bad debt reserves
accumulated after December 31, 1987.
Our state tax returns are not currently under audit or have not
been subject to an audit during the past five years, except as
follows. Our New York state tax returns for the years ended
December 31, 2000, through December 31, 2006, were
subject to an audit by the State of New York with respect to our
operation of NSB Services Corp. as a Delaware corporation not
subject to New York State taxation. In 2007, the Company
concluded the audit by the State of New York with respect to the
Companys combined state tax returns for years 2000 through
2006.
The
Prolonged Negative Effect of the Recession and Weak Economic
Recovery
The severe recession and weak economic recovery has resulted in
continued uncertainty in the financial markets in general and
concern about the possibility of another economic downturn. The
Federal Reserve, in an attempt to help the overall economy, has,
among other things, kept interest rates low through its targeted
federal funds rate and the purchase of mortgage-backed
securities. If the Federal Reserve increases the federal funds
rate, overall interest rates will likely rise which may
negatively impact the housing markets and the U.S. economic
recovery. A prolonged weakness in the economy generally, and in
the financial services industry in particular, could negatively
affect our operations by causing an increase in our provision
for loan losses and a deterioration of our loan portfolio which
would adversely affect our ability to originate loans. The
occurrence of any of these events could have an adverse impact
on our financial performance.
Current
Market and Economic Conditions and Related Government Responses
May Significantly Affect Our Operations, Financial Condition,
and Earnings
The severe economic recession of 2008 and 2009 and the weak
economic recovery since then have resulted in continued
uncertainty in the financial markets and the expectation of weak
general economic conditions, including high levels of
unemployment, continuing through 2010. The resulting economic
pressure on consumers and businesses would adversely affect our
business, financial condition, and results of operations. The
credit quality of loan and investment securities portfolios has
deteriorated at many financial institutions and the values of
real estate collateral supporting many commercial loans and home
mortgages
33
have declined and may continue to decline. Financial
companies stock prices have been negatively affected, as
has the ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise
capital or borrow in the debt markets.
Because of the recession and financial crisis, the potential
exists for new federal or state laws and regulations that would
change the bank regulatory framework, as well as lending and
funding practices and liquidity standards. Bank regulatory
agencies are expected to be active in responding to concerns and
trends identified in examinations. Negative developments in the
financial services industry and the domestic and international
credit markets, and the effect of new legislation in response to
these developments, may adversely affect our operations by
restricting our business operations, including our ability to
originate or sell loans, modify loan terms, or foreclose on
property securing a loan. These events may have a significant
adverse effect on our financial performance. In addition, these
risks could affect the performance and value of our loan and
investment securities portfolios, which also would negatively
affect our financial performance.
In addition, deflationary pressures, while possibly lowering our
operating costs, could have a significant negative effect on our
borrowers, especially our business borrowers, and the values of
underlying collateral securing loans, which could negatively
affect our financial performance.
Changes
in Market Interest Rates Could Adversely Affect Our Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Our financial condition and results of operations are
significantly affected by changes in market interest rates. Our
results of operations substantially depend on our net interest
income, which is the difference between the interest income we
earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense we
pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-bearing
liabilities generally reprice or mature more quickly than our
interest-earning assets. If rates increase rapidly, we may have
to increase the rates we are willing to pay on our deposits and
borrowed funds more quickly than any changes in interest rates
on our loans and investments, resulting in a negative effect on
interest spreads and net interest income. In addition, the
effect of rising rates could be compounded if deposit customers
move funds from savings accounts to higher rate certificate of
deposit accounts. Conversely, should market interest rates fall
below current levels, our net interest margin could also be
negatively affected if competitive pressures keep us from
further reducing rates on our deposits, while the yields on our
assets decrease more rapidly through loan prepayments and
interest rate adjustments.
We also are subject to reinvestment risk associated with changes
in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect the
average life of loans and mortgage-related securities. Decreases
in interest rates often result in increased prepayments of loans
and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance their
loans to reduce borrowings costs. Under these circumstances, we
are subject to reinvestment risk to the extent we are unable to
reinvest the cash received from such prepayments in loans or
other investments that have interest rates that are comparable
to the interest rates on existing loans and securities.
Additionally, increases in interest rates may decrease loan
demand
and/or may
make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate
loans.
Changes in interest rates also affect the value of our interest
earning assets and in particular our securities portfolio.
Generally, the value of securities fluctuates inversely with
changes in interest rates.
Because
Most of Our Borrowers are Located in the New York Metropolitan
Area, a Downturn in the Local Economy, and a Decline in Local
Real Estate Values Could Cause an Increase in Nonperforming
Loans, or a Decrease in Loan Demand, Which Would Reduce our
Profits
Substantially all loans are secured by real estate located in
our primary market areas. Continued weakness in our economy and
our real estate markets could adversely affect the ability of
our borrowers to repay their loans and the value of the
collateral securing our loans. Real estate values are affected
by various other factors, including supply and demand, changes
in general or regional economic conditions, interest rates,
governmental rules or policies, natural disasters, and terrorist
attacks.
Continued negative economic conditions also could result in
reduced loan demand and a decline in loan originations.
34
Declines
in Real Estate Values Could Decrease Our Loan Originations and
Increase Delinquencies and Defaults
Declines in real estate values in our market area could
adversely impact our results from operations. Like all financial
institutions, we are subject to the effects of any economic
downturn. In particular, a significant decline in real estate
values would likely lead to a decrease in new multifamily,
commercial real estate, and home equity loan originations and
increased delinquencies and defaults in our real estate loan
portfolio. Declines in the average sale prices of real estate in
our primary markets could lead to higher loan losses.
Our
Concentration in Multifamily Loans, Commercial Real Estate
Loans, and Construction and Land Lending Could Expose Us to
Increased Lending Risks and Related Loan Losses
Our current business strategy is to continue to emphasize
multifamily loans and to a lesser extent commercial real estate
loans. At December 31, 2009, $550.8 million, or 75.6%
of our total loan portfolio, consisted of multifamily,
commercial real estate, and construction and land loans. As a
result, our credit risk profile may be higher than traditional
thrift institutions that have higher concentrations of one- to
four-family residential mortgage loans. In addition, at
December 31, 2009, our largest industry concentration of
commercial real estate loans was hotels and motels, which
totaled $31.1 million, or 9.5% of commercial real estate
loans at that date.
A
Significant Portion of Our Loan Portfolio is
Unseasoned
Our loan portfolio has grown to $728.7 million at
December 31, 2009, from $387.8 million at
December 31, 2005. It is difficult to assess the future
performance of these recently originated loans because of our
relatively limited history in commercial real estate,
multifamily, and construction lending. We cannot assure you that
these loans will not have delinquency or charge-off levels above
our historical experience, which could adversely affect our
future performance.
If Our
Allowance for Loan Losses is Not Sufficient to Cover Actual Loan
Losses, Our Earnings Could Decrease
We make various assumptions and judgments about the
collectability of our loan portfolio, including the
creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real
estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment
of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance
for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and
delinquency experience, as well as the experience of other
similarly situated institutions, and we evaluate other factors
including, among other things, current economic conditions. If
our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may
not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan
portfolio, which would require additions to our allowance.
Material additions to our allowance would materially decrease
our net income.
In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance
for loan losses and, based on information available to them at
the time of their review, may require us to increase our
allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs.
An increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs
as required by these regulatory authorities may have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Lack of
Consumer Confidence in Financial Institutions May Decrease Our
Level of Deposits
Our level of deposits may be affected by lack of consumer
confidence in financial institutions, which has caused fewer
depositors to be willing to maintain deposits that are not
FDIC-insured. This may cause depositors to withdraw deposits and
place them in other institutions or to invest uninsured funds in
investments perceived as being more secure, such as securities
issued by the United States Treasury. These consumer preferences
may require us to pay higher interest rates to retain deposits
and may constrain liquidity as we seek to meet funding needs
caused by reduced deposit levels.
35
Strong
Competition Within Our Market Areas May Limit Our Growth and
Profitability
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is
intense. In our market areas, we compete with commercial banks,
savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, money market funds, insurance
companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating
locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have greater name
recognition and market presence which benefit them in attracting
business and offer certain services that we do not or cannot
provide. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price
loans and deposits more aggressively than we do.
In addition, the
2008-2009
crisis in the financial services industry has resulted in a
number of financial services companies such as investment banks
and automobile and real estate finance companies, electing to
become bank holding companies. These financial services
companies traditionally have generated funds from sources other
than insured bank deposits. Many of the alternative funding
sources traditionally utilized by these companies are no longer
available. This has resulted in these companies relying more on
insured bank deposits to fund their operations, which has
increased competition for deposits and the related costs of such
deposits.
Our profitability depends on our continued ability to compete
successfully in our market areas. For additional information see
Business of Northfield Bank Market Area and
Competition.
The Need
to Account for Certain Assets at Estimated Fair Value May
Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations
We report certain assets, including securities, at fair value.
Generally, for assets that are reported at fair value, we use
quoted market prices or valuation models that utilize observable
market inputs to estimate fair value. Because we carry these
assets on our books at their estimated fair value, we may incur
losses even if the asset in question presents minimal credit
risk. Elevated delinquencies, defaults, and estimated losses
from the disposition of collateral in our private-label
mortgage-backed securities portfolio may require us to recognize
additional
other-than-temporary
impairments in future periods with respect to our securities
portfolio. The amount and timing of any impairment recognized
will depend on the severity and duration of the decline in the
estimated fair value of the securities and our estimation of the
anticipated recovery period.
If the
Companys Investment in the Common Stock of the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York is Classified as
Other-Than-Temporarily
Impaired or as Permanently Impaired, Earnings and
Stockholders Equity Could Decrease
The Company owns stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
(FHLB-NY), which is part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.
The FHLB-NY common stock is held to qualify for membership in
the FHLB-NY and to be eligible to borrow funds under the
FHLB-NYs advance programs. The aggregate cost of our
FHLB-NY common stock as of December 31, 2009, was
$6.4 million based on its par value. There is no market for
FHLB-NY common stock.
Although the FHLB-NY is not reporting current operating
difficulties, recent published reports indicate that certain
member banks of the Federal Home Loan Bank System may be subject
to accounting rules and asset quality risks that could result in
materially lower regulatory capital levels. In an extreme
situation, it is possible that the capital of the Federal Home
Loan Bank System, including the FHLB-NY, could be substantially
diminished. Consequently, there is a risk that the
Companys investment in FHLB-NY common stock could be
deemed
other-than-temporarily
impaired at some time in the future, and if this occurs, it
would cause earnings and stockholders equity to decrease
by the impairment charge.
The Price
and Trading of Our Common Stock is Subject to Various Factors
Many of Which Are Beyond the Control of the Company
The price of our common stock can fluctuate significantly in
response to various factors, including, but not limited to:
actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;
news reports regarding trends and issues in the financial
services industry; the real estate market; interest rates;
earnings estimates and
36
recommendations of securities analysts; the performance and
stock price of other companies that investors or analysts deem
comparable to us; actual or anticipated changes in the economy;
capital market activities; mergers and acquisitions involving
our peers and speculation regarding our merger and acquisition
activities; speculation about, or an actual change in, dividend
payments; changes in legislation or regulation impacting the
financial services industry in particular, or publicly traded
companies in general; regulatory enforcement or other actions
against the Company or the Bank or its affiliates; threats of
terrorism or military conflicts; and general market
fluctuations. Fluctuations in our stock price may make it more
difficult for you to sell your common stock at an attractive
price.
We Hold
Certain Intangible Assets that Could Be Classified as Impaired
in The Future. If These Assets Are Considered To Be Either
Partially or Fully Impaired in the Future, Our Earnings and the
Book Values of These Assets Would Decrease
We are required to test our goodwill and core deposit intangible
assets for impairment on a periodic basis. The impairment
testing process considers a variety of factors, including the
current market price of our common shares, the estimated net
present value of our assets and liabilities and information
concerning the terminal valuation of similarly situated insured
depository institutions. It is possible that future impairment
testing could result in a partial or full impairment of the
value of our goodwill or core deposit intangible assets, or
both. If an impairment determination is made in a future
reporting period, our earnings and the book value of these
intangible assets will be reduced by the amount of the
impairment. If an impairment loss is recorded, it will have
little or no impact on the tangible book value of our shares of
common stock or our regulatory capital levels.
We Are
Subject to Extensive Regulatory Oversight
We and our subsidiaries are subject to extensive regulation and
supervision. Regulators have intensified their focus on bank
lending criteria and controls, and on the USA PATRIOT Acts
anti-money laundering and Bank Secrecy Act compliance
requirements. There also is increased scrutiny of our compliance
with the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control.
In order to comply with regulations, guidelines and examination
procedures in the anti-money laundering area, we have been
required to adopt policies and procedures and to install
systems. We cannot be certain that the policies, procedures, and
systems we have in place are flawless. Therefore, there is no
assurance that in every instance we will be in full compliance
with these requirements. Our failure to comply with these and
other regulatory requirements can lead to, among other remedies,
administrative enforcement actions, and legal proceedings. In
addition, recently enacted and proposed future legislation and
regulations have had, and are likely to continue to have a
significant effect on the financial services industry.
Regulatory or legislative changes could make regulatory
compliance more difficult or expensive for us, and could cause
us to change or limit some of our products and services, or the
way we operate our business.
Legislative
or Regulatory Responses to Perceived Financial and Market
Problems Could Impair Our Rights Against Borrowers.
Current and future proposals made by members of Congress would
reduce the amount distressed borrowers are otherwise
contractually obligated to pay under their mortgage loans, and
may limit the ability of lenders to foreclose on mortgage
collateral. If proposals such as these, or other proposals
limiting the banks rights as creditors, were to be
implemented, we could experience increased credit losses on our
loans and mortgage-backed securities, or increased expense in
pursuing our remedies as a creditor.
Northfield
Bank is Required to Maintain a Significant Percentage of its
Total Assets in Residential Mortgage Loans and Investments
Secured by Residential Mortgage Loans, Which Restricts Our
Ability to Diversify Our Loan Portfolio.
A federal savings bank or thrift differs from a commercial bank
in that it is required to maintain at least 65% of its total
assets in qualified thrift investments which
generally include loans and investments, for the purchase,
refinance, construction, improvement, or repair of residential
real estate, as well as home equity
37
loans, education loans and small business loans. To maintain our
federal savings bank charter we have to be a qualified
thrift lender or QTL in nine out of each 12
immediately preceding months. The QTL requirement limits the
extent to which we can grow our commercial loan portfolio.
However, a loan that does not exceed $2 million (including
a group of loans to one borrower) that is for commercial,
corporate, business, or agricultural purposes is included in our
qualified thrift investments. Because of the QTL requirement, we
may be limited in our ability to change our asset mix and
increase the yield on our earning assets by growing our
commercial loan portfolio.
In addition, if we continue to grow our commercial loan
portfolio and our single-family residential mortgage loan
portfolio decreases, it is possible that in order to maintain
our QTL status, we could be forced to buy mortgage-backed
securities or other qualifying assets at times when the terms of
such investments may not be attractive. Alternatively, we may
find it necessary to pursue different structures, including
converting Northfield Banks savings bank charter to a
commercial bank charter.
If
Enacted, Proposed Regulatory Reform Legislation May Have a
Material Effect on Our Operations.
Legislation has been proposed that would implement sweeping
changes to the current bank regulatory structure, including
eliminating our current primary federal regulator, the Office of
Thrift Supervision, by merging the Office of Thrift Supervision
into the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal
regulator for national banks). The proposed legislation would
also establish a Financial Services Oversight Council and grant
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System exclusive
authority to regulate all bank and thrift holding companies. As
a result, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC
would become bank holding companies subject to supervision by
the Federal Reserve Board as opposed to the Office of Thrift
Supervision, and would become subject to the Federal
Reserves regulations, including holding company capital
requirements which differ from those applicable to Northfield
Bancorp, Inc. and Northfield Bancorp, MHC as savings and loan
holding companies. In addition, compliance with new regulations
and being supervised by one or more new regulatory agencies
could increase our expenses.
The Office of Thrift Supervisions current regulations
allow mutual holding companies to waive the receipt of dividends
from their subsidiary banks or holding companies, and provides
that it will not take into account the amount of waived
dividends in determining an appropriate exchange ratio for
minority shares in the event of the conversion of a mutual
holding company to stock form. If the Office of Thrift
Supervision is eliminated, the Federal Reserve would likely
become the exclusive regulator of mutual holding companies, and
the Federal Reserve does not currently allow mutual holding
companies to waive dividends. This could have an adverse effect
on the Companys financial condition and the value of our
common stock.
Any
Future Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Insurance Premiums
or Special Assessments Will Adversely Affect Our
Earnings.
As part of its plan to restore the FDICs insurance reserve
ratio to 1.15 of estimated insured deposits, the FDIC imposed a
special assessment equal to 5 basis points of assets less
Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, which was payable
on September 30, 2009. In addition, the FDIC increased its
quarterly deposit insurance assessment rates and amended the
method by which rates are calculated. Institutions are now
assigned a base assessment rate ranging from 12 to 45 basis
points of deposits depending on the risk category of the
institution, which is then adjusted based on a certain risk
factors to establish a total base assessment rate ranging from 7
to 77.5 basis points.
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC also approved a final rule
requiring insured depository institutions to prepay on
December 30, 2009, their estimated quarterly risk-based
assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010,
2011, and 2012. Estimated assessments for the fourth quarter of
2009 and for all 2010 are based upon the assessment rate in
effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added
for the 2011 and 2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual
growth rate in the assessment base is assumed. Prepaid
assessments are to be applied against the actual quarterly
assessments until exhausted, and may not be applied to any
special assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused
prepayments will be returned to the
38
institution on June 30, 2013. On December 30, 2009, we
prepaid $5.7 million in estimated assessment fees for the
fourth quarter of 2009 through 2012.
The FDIC reported that as of December 31, 2009, the Deposit
Insurance Fund ratio was (at negative 0.39 percent) the
lowest reserve ratio for a combined bank and thrift insurance
fund on record. On September 29, 2009, the FDIC adopted an
amended restoration plan to allow the Deposit Insurance Fund to
return to a reserve ratio of 1.15 percent within eight
years. Actions the FDIC takes in the future to implement its
plan could result in significantly higher deposit insurance
premiums, special assessments, or prepaid assessments, which
could have a significant affect on our earnings.
Risks
Associated with System Failures, Interruptions, or Breaches of
Security Could Negatively Affect Our Earnings
Information technology systems are critical to our business. We
use various technology systems to manage our customer
relationships, general ledger, securities, deposits, and loans.
We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit
the impact of system failures, interruptions, and security
breaches, but there can be no assurance that such events will
not occur or that they will be adequately addressed if they do.
In addition any compromise of our systems could deter customers
from using our products and services. Although we rely on
security systems to provide security and authentication
necessary to effect the secure transmission of data, these
precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or
breaches of security.
In addition, we outsource a majority of our data processing to
certain third-party providers. If these third-party providers
encounter difficulties, or if we have difficulty communicating
with them, our ability to adequately process and account for
transactions could be affected, and our business operations
could be adversely affected. Threats to information security
also exist in the processing of customer information through
various other vendors and their personnel.
The occurrence of any system failures, interruption, or breach
of security could damage our reputation and result in a loss of
customers and business thereby subjecting us to additional
regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to litigation and
possible financial liability. Any of these events could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
No unresolved staff comments.
The Bank operates from our home office in Staten Island, New
York, our operations center located at 581 Main Street,
Woodbridge, NJ, and our additional 17 branch offices located in
New York and New Jersey. Our branch offices are located in the
New York Counties of Richmond, and Kings and the New Jersey
Counties of Middlesex and Union. The Bank also has a customer
service center in Lawrenceville, Georgia related to insurance
premium financing. The net book value of our premises, land, and
equipment was $12.7 million at December 31, 2009.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
In the normal course of business, we may be party to various
outstanding legal proceedings and claims. In the opinion of
management, the consolidated financial statements will not be
materially affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and
claims as of December 31, 2009.
39
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
|
(a) Our shares of common stock are traded on the Nasdaq
Global Select Market under the symbol NFBK. The
approximate number of holders of record of Northfield Bancorp,
Inc.s common stock as of December 31, 2009 was 4,828.
Certain shares of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. are held in
nominee or street name and accordingly,
the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or
included in the foregoing number. The following table presents
quarterly market information for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s
common stock for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
following information was provided by the NASDAQ Global Stock
Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
13.94
|
|
|
$
|
12.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
13.10
|
|
|
$
|
11.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
12.19
|
|
|
$
|
10.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
11.25
|
|
|
$
|
8.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
The sources of funds for the payment of a cash dividend are the
retained proceeds from the initial sale of shares of common
stock and earnings on those proceeds, interest, and principal
payments on Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s investments,
including its loan to Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s Employee
Stock Ownership Plan, and dividends from Northfield Bank.
For a discussion of Northfield Banks ability to pay
dividends, see Supervision and Regulation
Federal Banking Regulation.
40
Stock
Performance Graph
Set forth below is a stock performance graph comparing
(a) the cumulative total return on the Companys
Common Stock for the period November 8, 2007, through
December 31, 2009, (b) the cumulative total return of
the stocks included in the Nasdaq Composite Index over such
period, and, (c) the cumulative total return on stocks
included in the Nasdaq Bank Index over such period. Cumulative
return assumes the reinvestment of dividends, and is expressed
in dollars based on an assumed investment of $100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ending
|
Index
|
|
|
11/08/07
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
06/30/08
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
06/30/09
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (MHC)
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
103.54
|
|
|
|
|
102.87
|
|
|
|
|
108.02
|
|
|
|
|
112.40
|
|
|
|
|
131.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Composite Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
98.38
|
|
|
|
|
85.05
|
|
|
|
|
58.50
|
|
|
|
|
68.07
|
|
|
|
|
84.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ Bank Index
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
96.93
|
|
|
|
|
74.65
|
|
|
|
|
73.74
|
|
|
|
|
56.25
|
|
|
|
|
60.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had in effect at December 31, 2009, the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan which was approved by stockholders on
December 17, 2008. The 2008 Equity Incentive Plan provides
for the issuance of up to 3,073,488 equity awards. On
January 30, 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors awarded 832,450 shares of restricted stock,
and 2,102,600 stock options with tandem stock appreciation
rights.
41
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table shows the Companys repurchase of its
common stock for each calendar month in the three months ended
December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
of Shares that May Yet
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid per
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
Be Purchased Under
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
or Programs(1)
|
|
|
Plans or Programs(1)
|
|
|
October 1, 2009, through October 31, 2009
|
|
|
231,443
|
|
|
|
12.82
|
|
|
|
231,443
|
|
|
|
833,660
|
|
November 1, 2009, through November 30, 2009
|
|
|
221,050
|
|
|
|
12.76
|
|
|
|
221,050
|
|
|
|
612,610
|
|
December 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009
|
|
|
88,520
|
|
|
|
13.13
|
|
|
|
88,520
|
|
|
|
524,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
541,013
|
|
|
|
12.85
|
|
|
|
541,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On February 13, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Company
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the
Company intends to repurchase up to 2,240,153 shares,
representing approximately 5% of its outstanding shares. This
program has no expiration date. |
42
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The summary information presented below at the dates or for each
of the years presented is derived in part from our consolidated
financial statements. The following information is only a
summary, and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and notes included in this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Financial Condition Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
$
|
1,386,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,294,747
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,562
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
60,624
|
|
|
|
38,368
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
2,360
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale,
at estimated market value
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
802,417
|
|
|
|
713,098
|
|
|
|
863,064
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
19,686
|
|
|
|
26,169
|
|
|
|
34,841
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
|
|
424,329
|
|
|
|
409,189
|
|
|
|
387,467
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
(5,636
|
)
|
|
|
(5,030
|
)
|
|
|
(4,795
|
)
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
418,693
|
|
|
|
404,159
|
|
|
|
382,672
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
43,751
|
|
|
|
42,001
|
|
|
|
41,560
|
|
|
|
32,866
|
|
|
|
31,635
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
6,702
|
|
|
|
7,186
|
|
|
|
11,529
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,316,885
|
|
|
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
877,225
|
|
|
|
989,789
|
|
|
|
1,010,146
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
279,424
|
|
|
|
332,084
|
|
|
|
124,420
|
|
|
|
128,534
|
|
|
|
233,629
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,610,734
|
|
|
|
1,371,183
|
|
|
|
1,019,578
|
|
|
|
1,130,753
|
|
|
|
1,256,803
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
163,994
|
|
|
|
151,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
85,568
|
|
|
$
|
75,049
|
|
|
$
|
65,702
|
|
|
$
|
64,867
|
|
|
$
|
66,302
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,977
|
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
28,836
|
|
|
|
28,406
|
|
|
|
24,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income before provision for loan losses
|
|
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
36,866
|
|
|
|
36,461
|
|
|
|
42,068
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
47,553
|
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
35,424
|
|
|
|
36,226
|
|
|
|
40,439
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
4,354
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
34,254
|
|
|
|
24,852
|
|
|
|
35,950
|
|
|
|
23,818
|
|
|
|
21,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
17,008
|
|
|
|
23,535
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
6,166
|
|
|
|
10,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
|
$
|
15,831
|
|
|
$
|
10,507
|
|
|
$
|
10,842
|
|
|
$
|
13,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic and diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
42,405,774
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
|
|
43,076,586
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
42,532,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share in 2007 is calculated for the period that the
Companys shares of common stock were outstanding
(November 8, 2007, through December 31, 2007). The net
loss for this period was $1,500,000. |
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)(1)
|
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
|
|
0.88
|
%
|
Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)(1)
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
Interest rate spread(1)(3)
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
2.37
|
%
|
|
|
2.34
|
%
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
Net interest margin(1)(2)
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
2.81
|
%
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
Dividend payout ratio(6)
|
|
|
24.54
|
%
|
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio(1)(4)
|
|
|
55.26
|
%
|
|
|
46.94
|
%
|
|
|
77.57
|
%
|
|
|
58.01
|
%
|
|
|
45.79
|
%
|
Non-interest expense to average total assets(1)
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
1.77
|
%
|
|
|
1.42
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
130.44
|
%
|
|
|
136.94
|
%
|
|
|
123.33
|
%
|
|
|
118.89
|
%
|
|
|
115.69
|
%
|
Average equity to average total assets
|
|
|
20.82
|
%
|
|
|
23.84
|
%
|
|
|
14.73
|
%
|
|
|
11.47
|
%
|
|
|
10.21
|
%
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
5.73
|
%
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
0.53
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
36.86
|
%
|
|
|
91.07
|
%
|
|
|
57.31
|
%
|
|
|
70.70
|
%
|
|
|
232.88
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
2.11
|
%
|
|
|
1.49
|
%
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
1.23
|
%
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)(5)
|
|
|
28.52
|
%
|
|
|
34.81
|
%
|
|
|
38.07
|
%
|
|
|
25.03
|
%
|
|
|
23.72
|
%
|
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)(5)
|
|
|
27.24
|
%
|
|
|
33.68
|
%
|
|
|
37.23
|
%
|
|
|
24.25
|
%
|
|
|
22.97
|
%
|
Tier I capital (to adjusted assets (OTS), average assets
FDIC)(5)
|
|
|
14.35
|
%
|
|
|
15.98
|
%
|
|
|
18.84
|
%
|
|
|
12.38
|
%
|
|
|
10.62
|
%
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service offices
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Full time equivalent employees
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
2008 performance ratios include a $2.5 million tax-exempt
gain from the death of an officer and $463,000 ($292,000, net of
tax) in costs associated with the Banks conversion to a
new core processing system that was completed in January 2009.
2007 performance ratios include the after-tax effect of: a
charge of $7.8 million due to the Companys
contribution to the Northfield Bank Foundation; a gain of
$2.4 million as a result of the sale of two branch
locations, and associated deposit relationships; net interest
income of approximately $0.8 million, for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as it relates to short-term investment
returns earned on subscription proceeds (net of interest paid
during the stock offering); and the reversal of state and local
tax liabilities of approximately $4.5 million, net of
federal taxes. 2006 performance ratios include the after tax
effect of a $0.9 million charge related to a supplemental
retirement agreement entered into by the Company with its former
president. |
|
(2) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a
percent of average interest-earning assets for the period. |
|
(3) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the
weighted-average yield on interest earning assets and the
weighted-average costs of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by
the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. |
|
(5) |
|
Ratios for 2004 through 2006 were determined pursuant to Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations. Beginning
November 6, 2007, Northfield Bank became subject to the
capital requirements under Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations, while the capital regulations of these two agencies
are substantially similar, they are not identical. |
|
(6) |
|
Dividend payout ratio is calculated as total dividends declared
for the year (excluding dividends waived by Northfield Bancorp,
MHC) divided by net income for the year. |
44
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report
(collectively, the Financial Statements).
Overview
On November 7, 2007, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. completed its
initial stock offering whereby the Company sold
19,265,316 shares of common stock, for a price of $10.00
per share. The transaction closed at the adjusted maximum level
of shares permitted by the offering. The shares sold represented
43.0% of the shares of the Companys common stock
outstanding following the stock offering. The Company also
contributed 2.0% of the shares of our outstanding common stock,
or 896,061 shares, and $3.0 million in cash, to the
Northfield Bank Foundation, a charitable foundation established
by Northfield Bank. Northfield Bancorp, MHC, the Companys
federally chartered mutual holding company parent, owns 56.12%
of the Companys outstanding common stock as of
December 31, 2009.
Net income amounted to $12.1 million for 2009, as compared
to $15.8 million for 2008. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, our return on average assets and average
shareholders equity were 0.64% and 3.09%, respectively, as
compared to 1.01% and 4.22% for 2008. The decreases in our
return on average equity and average assets are due primarily to
the decrease in our net income during 2009 as compared to 2008.
Included in 2008 net income was a $2.5 million
tax-exempt gain from the death of an officer and $463,000
($292,000, net of tax) in costs associated with the Banks
conversion to a new core processing system that was completed in
January 2009.
Net interest income increased $9.8 million, or 20.9%, to
$56.6 million for the 2009 as compared to
$46.8 million for 2008. During 2009, our net interest
margin increased 3 basis points to 3.16% as compared to
2008. The increases in our net interest margin was due to a
steeper yield curve which allowed us to reduce deposit costs at
a faster pace than the decrease in our investment and loan
yields.
The provision for loan losses amounted to $9.0 million for
2009 as compared to $5.1 million for 2008. The increase in
the provision for loan losses reflects the risks inherent in our
loan portfolio due to an increase in total loans outstanding,
changes in composition, elevated levels of nonperforming loans
and delinquencies, impairment losses on specific loans, and
increases in general loss factors utilized in managements
estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio in
recognition of the current recessionary economic environment and
real estate market. Non-performing loans were $41.8 million
or 5.73% of total loans at December 31, 2009 as compared to
$9.6 million or 1.63% of total loans at December 31,
2008.
Total non-interest income was $5.4 million for 2009 as
compared to $6.2 million for 2008. Included in non-interest
income were fee and service charges of $2.7 million and
income on bank owned life insurance of $1.8 million. In
addition, the Company recognized net gains on securities
transactions of $891,000, which consisted of $299,000 in gains
resulting from the sale of smaller balance mortgage-backed
securities, and $592,000 related to the Companys trading
portfolio which is utilized to fund the Companys deferred
compensation obligation to certain employees and directors in
the plan.
Total non-interest expense increased $9.4 million, or
37.8%, to $34.3 million for 2009 from $24.9 million
for 2008. The increase is primarily due to increases in FDIC
insurance costs of $2.1 million, $5.2 million in
compensation and employee benefits expense, and $793,000 in
director compensation expense.
We grew our assets by 13.9% to $2.002 billion at
December 31, 2009, from $1.758 billion at
December 31, 2008. The increase in total assets was
reflective of increases in securities and loans held for
investment, net, partially offset by a decrease in certificates
of deposit in other financial institutions.
Net loans held for investment increased $132.6 million to
$713.9 million at December 31, 2009, from
$581.2 million at December 31, 2008. We continue to
focus on originating multifamily and commercial real estate
loans to the extent such loan demand exists while meeting our
underwriting standards. In addition, the
45
Company purchased approximately $35.4 million of insurance
premium loans during the quarter ended December 31, 2009,
and grew this portfolio to $40.4 million at year end.
Total securities increased $167.4 million to
$1.1 billion at December 31, 2009, from
$974.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in
securities was primarily due to purchases of $655.8 million
of securities partially offset by pay-downs and maturities of
$505.1 million and sales of $6.7 million.
The increase in our total assets during 2009 was funded
primarily by an increase in customer deposits. Deposits
increased $292.4 million to $1.317 billion at
December 31, 2009, from $1.024 billion at
December 31, 2008. The increase in deposits was
attributable to growth in all deposit categories (transaction,
savings, and time deposits). Borrowed funds decreased
$52.7 million to $279.4 million at December 31,
2009, from $332.1 million at December 31, 2008. We
anticipate that we will be able to fund our future growth
primarily with customer deposits, using borrowed funds as a
supplemental funding source if cost effective deposits are not
available.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that involve
significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially
result in materially different results under different
assumptions and conditions. We believe that the most critical
accounting policies upon which our financial condition and
results of operation depend, and which involve the most complex
subjective decisions or assessments, are the following:
Allowance for Loan Losses, Impaired Loans, Troubled Debt
Restructurings and Other Real Estate Owned. The
allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered
necessary to cover probable and reasonably estimatable credit
losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date.
The allowance is established through the provision for loan
losses that is charged against income. In determining the
allowance for loan losses, we make significant estimates and
judgments. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is
considered a critical accounting policy by management because of
the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the
assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the economic
environment that could result in changes to the amount of the
recorded allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance
with GAAP. We are responsible for the timely and periodic
determination of the amount of the allowance required. We
believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover
identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our
portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not
specifically identifiable.
Management performs a formal quarterly evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The analysis of the
allowance for loan losses has a component for impaired loan
losses and a component for general loan losses. Management has
defined an impaired loan to be a loan for which it is probable,
based on current information, that the Company will not collect
all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. We have defined the population of impaired loans
to be all non-accrual loans with an outstanding balance of
$500,000 or greater, and all loans subject to a troubled debt
restructuring. Impaired loans are individually assessed to
determine that the loans carrying value is not in excess
of the estimated fair value of the collateral (less cost to
sell), if the loan is collateral dependent, or the present value
of the expected future cash flows, if the loan is not collateral
dependent. Management performs a detailed evaluation of each
impaired loan and generally obtains updated appraisals as part
of the evaluation. In addition, management adjusts estimated
fair values down to appropriately consider recent market
conditions, our willingness to accept lower sales price to
effect a quick sale, and costs to dispose of any supporting
collateral. Determining the estimated fair value of underlying
collateral (and related costs to sell) can be difficult in
illiquid real estate markets and is subject to significant
assumptions and estimates. Management employs an independent
third party expert in appraisal preparation and review to
ascertain the reasonableness of updated appraisals. Projecting
the expected cash flows under troubled debt restructurings is
inherently subjective and requires, among other things, an
evaluation of the borrowers current and projected
financial condition. Actual results may be
46
significantly different than our projections, and our
established allowance for loan losses on these loans, and could
have a material effect on our financial results.
The second component of the allowance for loan losses is the
general loss allocation. This assessment is performed on a
portfolio basis, excluding impaired and trouble debt
restructured loans, with loans being grouped into similar risk
characteristics, primarily loan type,
loan-to-value
(if collateral dependent) and delinquency status. We apply an
estimated loss rate to each loan group. The loss rates applied
are based on our loss experience as adjusted for our qualitative
assessment of relevant changes related to: underwriting
standards; delinquency trends; collection, charge-off and
recovery practices; the nature or volume of the loan group;
lending staff; concentration of loan type; current economic
conditions; and other relevant factors considered appropriate by
management. In evaluating the estimated loss factors to be
utilized for each loan group, management also reviews actual
loss history over an extended period of time as reported by the
OTS and FDIC for institutions both nationally and in our market
area, for periods that are believed to have been under similar
economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as
it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to
significant revisions based on changes in economic and real
estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be
significantly different than the allowance for loan losses we
have established, and could have a material effect on our
financial results.
This quarterly process is performed by the credit administration
department and approved by the Chief Lending Officer. The Chief
Financial Officer performs a final review of the calculation.
All supporting documentation with regard to the evaluation
process is maintained by credit administration. Each quarter a
summary of the allowance for loan losses is presented by the
Chief Lending Officer to the Audit Committee of the board of
directors.
We have a concentration of loans secured by real property
located in New York and New Jersey. As a substantial amount of
our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals
of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical
in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific
loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in
determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic
assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could
significantly impact the valuation of a property securing a loan
and the related allowance determined. The assumptions supporting
such appraisals are reviewed by management to determine that the
resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the
collateral. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, we
believe the primary risks are increases in interest rates, a
decline in the economy generally, and a decline in real estate
market values in New York or New Jersey. Any one or a
combination of these events may adversely affect our loan
portfolio resulting in delinquencies, increased loan losses, and
future loan loss provisions.
Although we believe we have established and maintained the
allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, changes may be
necessary if future economic or other conditions differ
substantially from our estimation of the current operating
environment. Although management uses the information available,
the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate
that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change.
In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral
part of their examination process, will periodically review our
allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to
recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments
about information available to them at the time of their
examination.
We also maintain an allowance for estimated losses on
off-balance sheet credit risks related to loan commitments and
standby letters of credit. Management utilizes a methodology
similar to its allowance for loan loss methodology to estimate
losses on these items. The allowance for estimated credit losses
on these items is included in other liabilities and any changes
to the allowance are recorded as a component of other
non-interest expense.
Real estate acquired by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed
in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. When
the Company acquires other real estate owned, it generally
obtains a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying
value of the asset. The asset is recorded at the lower of cost
or
47
estimated fair value, establishing a new cost basis. Holding
costs and declines in estimated fair value result in charges to
expense after acquisition.
Goodwill. Business combinations accounted for
under the acquisition method requires us to record as assets on
our financial statements goodwill, an unidentifiable intangible
asset which is equal to the excess of the purchase price which
we pay for another company over the estimated fair value of the
net assets acquired. Net assets acquired include identifiable
intangible assets such as core deposit intangibles and
non-compete agreements. We evaluate goodwill for impairment
annually on December 31, and more often if circumstances
warrant, and we will reduce its carrying value through a charge
to earnings if impairment exists. Future events or changes in
the estimates that we use to determine the carrying value of our
goodwill or which otherwise adversely affect its value could
have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. As
of December 31, 2009, goodwill had a carrying value of
$16.2 million.
Securities Valuation and Impairment. Our
securities portfolio is comprised of mortgage-backed securities
and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, agency bonds, and mutual
funds. Our
available-for-sale
securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with
any unrealized gains or losses, net of taxes, reported as
accumulated other comprehensive income or loss in
stockholders equity. Our trading securities portfolio is
reported at estimated fair value. Our
held-to-maturity
securities portfolio, consisting of debt securities for which we
have a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity, is
carried at amortized cost. We conduct a quarterly review and
evaluation of the
available-for-sale
and
held-to-maturity
securities portfolios to determine if the estimated fair value
of any security has declined below its amortized cost, and
whether such decline is
other-than-temporary.
If such decline is deemed
other-than-temporary,
we adjust the cost basis of the security by writing down the
security to estimated fair value through a charge to current
period operations. The estimated fair values of our securities
are primarily affected by changes in interest rates, credit
quality, and market liquidity.
Management is responsible for determining the estimated fair
value of the Companys securities. In determining estimated
fair values, management utilizes the services of an independent
third party recognized as a specialist in pricing securities.
The independent pricing service utilizes market prices of same
or similar securities whenever such prices are available. Prices
involving distressed sellers are not utilized in determining
fair value. Where necessary, the independent third party pricing
service estimates fair value using models employing techniques
such as discounted cash flow analyses. The assumptions used in
these models typically include assumptions for interest rates,
credit losses, and prepayments, utilizing observable market
data, where available. Where the market price of the same or
similar securities is not available, the valuation becomes more
subjective and involves a high degree of judgment. On a
quarterly basis, we review the pricing methodologies utilized by
the independent third party pricing service for each security
type. In addition, we compare securities prices to a second
independent pricing service that is utilized as part of our
asset liability risk management process. At December 31,
2009, and for each quarter end in 2009, all securities were
priced by the independent third party pricing service, and
management made no adjustment to the prices received.
Determining that a securitys decline in estimated fair
value is
other-than-temporary
is inherently subjective, and becomes increasing difficult as it
relates to mortgage-backed securities that are not guaranteed by
the U.S. Government, or a U.S. Government Sponsored
Enterprise (e.g., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). In performing our
evaluation of securities in an unrealized loss position, we
consider among other things, the severity, and duration of time
that the security has been in an unrealized loss position and
the credit quality of the issuer. As it relates to
mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by the
U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, we perform a
review of the key underlying loan collateral risk
characteristics including, among other things, origination
dates, interest rate levels, composition of variable and fixed
rates, reset dates (including related pricing indices), current
loan to original collateral values, locations of collateral,
delinquency status of loans, and current credit support. In
addition, for securities experiencing declines in estimated fair
values of over 10%, as compared to its amortized cost,
management also reviews published historical and expected
prepayment speeds, underlying loan collateral default rates, and
related historical and expected losses on the disposal of the
underlying collateral on defaulted loans. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires estimates of
48
future events, many of which are difficult to predict. Actual
results could be significantly different than our estimates and
could have a material effect on our financial results.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock Impairment
Assessment. Northfield Bank is a member of the
Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional
Federal Home Loan Banks. As a member of the Federal Home Loan
Bank of New York (FHLB-NY), Northfield Bank is required to
acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB-NY in an
amount determined by a membership investment
component and an activity-based investment
component. As of December 31, 2009, Northfield Bank was in
compliance with its ownership requirement. At December 31,
2009, Northfield Bank held $6.4 million of FHLB-NY common
stock. In performing our evaluation of our investment in FHLB-NY
stock, on a quarterly basis, management reviews the most recent
financial statements of the FHLB of New York and determines
whether there have been any adverse changes to its capital
position as compared to the trailing period. In addition,
management reviews the FHLB-NYs most recent
Presidents Report in order to determine whether or not a
dividend has been declared for the current reporting period.
Furthermore, management obtains the credit rating of the FHLB-NY
from an accredited credit rating industry to ensure that no
downgrades have occurred. At December 31, 2009, it was
determined by management that the Banks investment in FHLB
stock was not impaired.
Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and
liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. If it is
determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is
established. We consider the determination of this valuation
allowance to be a critical accounting policy because of the need
to exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and
timing of recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets,
including projections of future taxable income. These judgments
and estimates are reviewed quarterly as regulatory and business
factors change. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
may be required if the amounts of taxes recoverable through loss
carry backs decline, or if we project lower levels of future
taxable income. Such a valuation allowance would be established
and any subsequent changes to such allowance would require an
adjustment to income tax expense that could adversely affect our
operating results.
Stock Based Compensation. We recognize the
cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of
equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value for all
awards granted.
We estimate the per share fair value of option grants on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using
assumptions for the expected dividend yield, expected stock
price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected option
term. These assumptions are based on our judgments regarding
future option exercise experience and market conditions. These
assumptions are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties,
and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The
Black-Scholes option pricing model also contains certain
inherent limitations when applied to options that are not traded
on public markets.
The per share fair value of options is highly sensitive to
changes in assumptions. In general, the per share fair value of
options will move in the same direction as changes in the
expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and
expected option term, and in the opposite direction of changes
in the expected dividend yield. For example, the per share fair
value of options will generally increase as expected stock price
volatility increases, risk-free interest rate increases,
expected option term increases and expected dividend yield
decreases. The use of different assumptions or different option
pricing models could result in materially different per share
fair values of options.
As our Companys stock does not have a significant amount
of historical price volatility, we utilized the historical stock
price volatility of a peer group when pricing stock options.
49
Comparison
of Financial Condition at December 31, 2009 and
2008
Total assets increased $244.5 million, or 13.9%, to
$2.0 billion at December 31, 2009, from
$1.8 billion at December 31, 2008. The increase in
total assets was reflective of increases in securities of
$167.4 million and loans held for investment, net of
$139.3 million, partially offset by a decrease of
$53.7 million in certificates of deposit in other financial
institutions.
Certificates of deposit in other financial institutions
decreased $53.7 million, or 100.0%, from December 31,
2008, to $0 at December 31, 2009. The decrease was
primarily a result of the Company utilizing the excess cash to
fund loans and purchase higher yielding investment securities
during the year.
Loans
held-for-investment,
net of deferred loan fees, increased $139.3 million, or
23.6%, to $729.3 million at December 31, 2009, from
$590.0 million at December 31, 2008. We continue to
focus on originating multifamily and commercial real estate
loans to the extent such loan demand exists while meeting our
underwriting standards. Multi-family real estate loans increased
$69.9 million, or 64.4%, to $178.4 million, from
$108.5 million at December 31, 2008. Commercial real
estate loans increased $38.7 million, or 13.4%, to
$327.8 million, commercial and industrial loans increased
$8.2 million, or 74.6%, to $19.3 million, and home
equity loans and lines increased $1.9 million, or 8.0%,
from $24.2 million at December 31, 2008. In addition,
the Company purchased approximately $35.4 million of
insurance premium loans during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, and grew this portfolio to
$40.4 million at year end. These increases were partially
offset by decreases in residential loans, and land and
construction loans.
The Companys securities portfolio totaled
$1.1 billion at December 31, 2009, as compared to
$974.6 million at year end 2008, an increase of
$167.4 million, or 17.2%. Securities
available-for-sale
increased $174.2 million, or 18.2%, to $1.1 billion at
December 31, 2009, from $957.6 million at
December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to the
purchase of approximately $655.8 million of securities
partially offset by pay-downs and maturities of
$500.5 million and sales of $3.3 million. The
purchases were funded primarily by increased deposits,
pay-downs, and maturities. Securities
held-to-maturity
decreased $7.7 million, or 53.4%, to $6.7 million at
December 31, 2009, from $14.5 million at
December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable
to sales of approximately $3.4 million, coupled with
pay-downs and maturities of $4.6 million. The Company
routinely sells securities after a substantial portion (85% of
the principal) has been recovered through repayments as the cost
of servicing such investments becomes prohibitive.
At December 31, 2009, $773.9 million of the
Companys security portfolio were residential
mortgage-backed
securities issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and
Ginnie Mae. At the end of 2009, the Company also held
residential mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae, referred to as private
label securities.
Our
available-for-sale
securities portfolio at December 31, 2009, consisted of
securities with the following amortized cost:
$469.5 million of pass-through mortgage-backed securities,
of which $404.1 million were issued or guaranteed by GSEs
and $65.4 million were issued by non-GSEs;
$455.9 million of REMICs, of which $344.2 million were
issued or guaranteed by GSEs and $111.8 million were issued
by non-GSEs; and $185.4 million of other securities,
consisting of corporate obligations, GSE bonds, and equity
securities which primarily consisted of a money market mutual
fund.
Included in the above
available-for-sale
security amounts, at December 31, 2009, were 23 residential
mortgage-backed senior class securities issued by non-GSEs with
an amortized cost of $177.1 million and an estimated fair
value of $176.7 million. Eight of these securities were in
an unrealized loss position with an amortized cost of
$40.1 million and estimated fair value of
$36.3 million.
Of the eight non-GSE securities in an unrealized loss position
all but three were rated AAA at December 31, 2009. These
three securities had a total amortized cost of
$20.1 million and an estimated fair value of
$16.6 million at December 31, 2009. The first of these
three securities had an estimated fair value of
$5.5 million, was rated AA (downgraded to a rating of A
subsequent to December 31, 2009), and had the following
underlying collateral characteristics; 84% originated in 2004
and 16% originated in 2005. The second security had an estimated
fair value of $5.9 million, was rated Baa2, and had the
following underlying collateral characteristics; 83% originated
in 2004 and 17% originated in 2005. The remaining security had
an
50
estimated fair value of $5.2 million, was rated CCC, and
was supported by collateral entirely originated in 2006.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Company
recognized
another-than-temporary
impairment of $1.4 million on the $5.2 million
security that was rated CCC. Since management does not have the
intent to sell the security, and it is more likely than not that
the Company will not be required to sell the security before the
anticipated recovery of the estimated fair value, the credit
component of $176,000 was recognized in earnings during the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, and the non-credit
component of $1.2 million was recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. The Company
continues to receive principal and interest payments in
accordance with the contractual terms of these securities.
Management has evaluated, among other things, delinquency
status, estimated prepayment speeds and the estimated default
rates and loss severity in liquidating the underlying collateral
for each of these three securities. As a result of
managements evaluation of these securities, the Company
believes that unrealized losses at December 31, 2009, are
temporary, and as such, are recorded as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. All other
losses within the Companys investment portfolio were
deemed to be temporary at December 31, 2009.
Management evaluated the remaining five non-GSE securities that
experienced unrealized losses of less than five percent at
December 31, 2009. These five securities, with an amortized
cost of $20.1 million, and estimated fair value of
$19.7 million, were reviewed for key underlying loan risk
characteristics including origination dates, interest rate
levels and composition of variable and fixed rates, reset dates
(including related pricing indices), current loan to original
collateral values, locations of collateral, delinquency status
of loans, and current credit support. Management believes that
it is not probable that the Company will not receive all amounts
due under the contractual terms of the securities.
Deposits increased $292.4 million, or 28.5%, to
$1.3 billion at December 31, 2009, from
$1.0 billion at December 31, 2008. Certificates of
deposit increased $161.8 million, or 38.7%, to
$579.4 million at December 31, 2009, from
$417.6 million at December 31, 2008. Savings and money
market accounts increased $115.3 million, or 25.7%, to
$564.6 million at December 31, 2009, from
$449.3 million at December 31, 2008. Transaction
accounts increased $15.4 million, or 9.8%, to
$172.9 million at December 31, 2009, from
$157.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in
deposits was attributable primarily to the Companys
continued focus on growing the deposit franchise by offering
competitive pricing and products, as well as an increase in
consumer demand for FDIC insured deposit products related to the
financial market turmoil experienced in late 2008 and continuing
into 2009.
Total borrowings decreased $52.7 million, or 15.9%, to
$279.4 million at December 31, 2009, from
$332.1 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in
borrowings was attributable primarily to maturities during the
year with such funding being replaced with deposits.
Total stockholders equity increased to $391.5 million
at December 31, 2009, from $386.6 million at
December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily attributable
to net income of $12.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and other comprehensive income of
$12.2 million resulting primarily from a decrease in market
interest rates that resulted in an increase in the estimated
fair value of our securities available for sale. The increase in
stockholders equity also was attributable to a
$3.0 million increase in additional paid-in capital
primarily related to the recognition of compensation expense
associated with equity awards. These increases were partially
offset by $19.9 million in stock repurchases and the
declaration and payment of approximately $3.0 million in
dividends for the year ended December 31, 2009. In February
2009, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may repurchase
up to 2,240,153 shares of its outstanding shares. The
Company is conducting the repurchases in accordance with a
Rule 10b5-1
trading plan, and through December 31, 2009, has purchased
1,716,063 shares of common stock, at an average cost of
$11.61 per share.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2009
and 2008
General. Net income decreased
$3.8 million or 23.7%, to $12.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $15.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. Included in 2008 net
income was a
51
$2.5 million tax-exempt gain from the death of an officer
and $463,000 ($292,000, net of tax) in costs associated with the
Banks conversion to a new core processing system that was
completed in January 2009.
Interest Income. Interest income increased by
$10.5 million, or 14.0%, to $85.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $75.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $298.9 million, or 20.0%, partially offset by a
decrease in the average rate earned of 26 basis points, or
5.2%, to 4.77% for the year ended December 31, 2009, from
5.03% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Interest income on loans increased $7.3 million, or 23.0%,
to $38.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
from $31.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The average balance of loans increased
$149.9 million, or 29.7%, to $653.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009, from $503.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, reflecting our current
efforts to grow our multifamily and commercial real estate loan
portfolios, and the purchase of an insurance premium loan
portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2009. The yield on our
loan portfolio decreased 32 basis points, or 5.1%, to 5.95%
for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 6.27% for the
year ended December 31, 2008, primarily as a result of
decreases in interest rates on new originations and on our
adjustable-rate loans, due to the lower interest rate
environment in 2009, and the effect of non-accrual loans.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased
$4.2 million, or 11.0%, to $42.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $38.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The increase resulted from an
increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of
$76.4 million, or 9.0%, to $920.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $844.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The increase is due primarily
to the implementation of ongoing leveraging strategies within
board approved risk parameters. The yield we earned on
mortgage-backed securities increased eight basis points, or
1.8%, to 4.59% for the year ended December 31, 2009, from
4.51% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in
rate earned was due primarily to paydowns on lower yielding
securities and the purchase of higher yielding private-label
mortgage-backed securities.
Interest income on other securities increased $1.9 million,
or 139.1%, to $3.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from $1.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The increase resulted from an
increase in the average balance of other securities, primarily
corporate bonds, of $91.0 million, or 252.9%, to
$127.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
from $36.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008, partially offset by a 121 basis point decrease in the
yield on this portfolio, to 2.54% for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in other securities related
primarily to the purchase of shorter-term bonds with relatively
low interest rates due to the current interest rate environment.
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions
decreased $2.6 million, or 76.2%, to $801,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $3.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The average balance of
deposits in other financial institutions decreased
$14.1 million, or 14.5%, to $83.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $97.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The yield on deposits in
other financial institutions decreased 250 basis points for
the year ended December 31, 2009, from 3.46% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to the continued
general decline in the interest rate environment in 2009.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased
$721,000, or 2.6%, to $29.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from $28.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The increase resulted from an
increase of $283.5 million, or 26.0%, in the average
balance of interest-bearing liabilities being partially offset
by a decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities
of 48 basis points, or 18.5%, to 2.11% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, from 2.59% for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased
$308,000, or 1.7%, to $18.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to $18.5 million, for
the year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease was a
result of a 59 basis point, or 25.9%, decline in the
average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, to 1.69% for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2.28% for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The rate paid on certificates
of deposit decreased 105 basis points, or 30.5%, to 2.39%
52
for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 3.44%,
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The rate paid on
savings, NOW, and money market accounts also decreased
25 basis points, or 18.9%, to 1.07% for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as compared to 1.32%, for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The decrease in the cost of deposits was
partially offset by an increase of $263.3 million, or
32.4%, in the average balance of deposits outstanding, to
$1.077 billion at December 31, 2009.
Interest expense on borrowings (repurchase agreements and other
borrowings) increased $1.0 million, or 10.6%, to
$10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
from $9.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The average balance of borrowings increased
$20.1 million, or 7.3%, to $297.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $277.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The average balance of
borrowings increased due to the Company implementing
shorter-term securities leverage strategies within board
approved risk parameters in 2009. The average rate paid on
borrowings also increased 11 basis points to 3.62%, or
3.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 3.51% for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Net Interest Income. The increase in net
interest income of $9.8 million, or 20.9%, for the year
ended December 31, 2009, was primarily the result of an
increase in average interest-earning assets of
$298.9 million, or 20.0%, and the expansion in the net
interest margin of three basis points for the reasons detailed
above.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a
provision for loan losses of $9.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, and $5.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. We had charge-offs of
$2.4 million and $1.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in
charge-offs in 2009 was primarily attributable to an increase of
$346,000 in charge-offs related to commercial real estate loans
and an increase of $164,000 in charge-offs related to
multifamily real estate loans. The increased provisioning and
charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2009, as
compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, resulted in
an allowance for loans losses of $15.4 million, or 2.11% of
total loans receivable at December 31, 2009, compared to
$8.8 million, or 1.49% of total loans receivable at
December 31, 2008. The increase in the provision for loan
losses in the current year was due to a number of factors
including an increase in total loans outstanding, changes in
composition, increases in non-accrual loans and delinquencies,
impairment losses on specific loans, and increases in general
loss factors utilized in managements estimate of credit
losses inherent in the loan portfolio in recognition of the
current recessionary economic environment and real estate market.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income
decreased $760,000, or 12.4%, to $5.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, from $6.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was due
primarily to the absence of a previously recognized
$2.5 million, nontaxable, death benefit realized on bank
owned life insurance during the year ended December 31,
2008. This was partially offset by an increase of
$2.2 million, or 167.6%, in gains on securities
transactions, net, from a loss of $1.3 million during the
year ended December 31, 2008, to a gain of $891,000
recognized during the year ended December 31, 2009. The
Company recorded net securities gains during 2009 of $299,000,
which primarily resulted from the sale of smaller balance
mortgage-backed securities. The Company routinely sells these
smaller balance securities as the cost of servicing becomes
prohibitive. Securities gains during 2009 also included $592,000
related to the Companys trading portfolio which is
utilized to fund the Companys deferred compensation
obligation to certain employees and directors in the plan. The
Company recorded securities losses of $1.3 million in 2008
in its trading portfolio. The participants of this plan, at
their election, defer a portion of their compensation. Gains and
losses on trading securities have no effect on net income since
participants benefit from, and bear the full risk of, changes in
the trading securities market values. Therefore, the
Company records an equal and offsetting amount in non-interest
expense, reflecting the change in the Companys obligations
under the plan.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense
increased $9.4 million, or 37.8%, to $34.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, from $24.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. This includes a
$2.1 million increase in FDIC deposit insurance expense for
the year ended December 31, 2009, of which approximately
$770,000 related to the FDICs special assessment
recognized in the second quarter of 2009. Non-interest expense
also increased in 2009 due to an increase of $5.2 million
in compensation and employee benefits expense, which included
$2.1 million for equity awards. The remaining increase in
employee
53
compensation and benefits costs pertained to an increase of
approximately $1.9 million related to the deferred
compensation plan (explained in the prior paragraph), coupled
with increases in personnel, higher health care costs, and merit
and market salary adjustments effective January 1, 2009.
Non-interest expense also increased in 2009 due to higher levels
of professional fees associated with loan restructurings and
collection efforts, increases in personnel, and higher premises
and equipment costs associated with additional operations center
leasehold improvements, branch improvements, and lease payments
on future branch locations.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded a
provision for income taxes of $6.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $7.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The effective tax
rate for the year ended December 31, 2009, was 35.4%, as
compared to 31.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
increase in the effective tax rate was the result of a higher
percentage of pre-tax income being subject to taxation in 2009,
as compared to 2008. Income on bank owned life insurance in 2008
included a $2.5 million, nontaxable, death benefit.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2008
and 2007
General. Net income increased
$5.3 million or 50.7%, to $15.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $10.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. Included in 2008 net
income is a $2.5 million tax-exempt life insurance gain due
to the death of an officer and $463,000 ($292,000, net of tax)
in costs associated with the Banks conversion to a new
core processing system that was completed in January 2009.
Included in 2007 net income is a $12.0 million
($7.8 million, net of tax) charge related to the
Companys contribution to the Northfield Bank Foundation,
which was substantially offset by net interest income of
approximately $1.4 million ($795,000, net of tax) related
to short-term investment returns earned on subscription proceeds
(net of interest paid during the stock offering), the reversal
of state and local tax liabilities of $4.5 million, net of
federal taxes, as a result of the Company concluding an audit by
the State of New York with respect to the Companys
combined state tax returns for years 2000 through 2006, and a
gain of $4.3 million ($2.4 million, net of tax)
related to the sale of two branch locations and associated
deposit relationships.
Interest Income. Interest income increased by
$9.3 million, or 14.2%, to $75.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $65.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase in average interest-earning
assets of $207.2 million, or 16.1%, partially offset by a
decrease in the average rate earned of eight basis points, or
1.6%, to 5.03% for the year ended December 31, 2008, from
5.11% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest income on loans increased $3.2 million, or 11.3%,
to $31.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $28.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The average balance of loans increased $80.0 million,
or 18.9%, to $503.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $423.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, reflecting our current efforts to
grow our multifamily and commercial real estate loan portfolios.
The yield on our loan portfolio decreased 43 basis points,
or 6.4%, to 6.27% for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from 6.70% for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily
as a result of decreases in interest rates on our
adjustable-rate loans, and the generally lower interest rate
environment in 2008. The Federal Reserve decreased short-term
rates 400 basis points during 2008.
Interest income on mortgage-backed securities increased
$7.5 million, or 24.5%, to $38.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $30.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The increase resulted from an
increase in the average balance of mortgage-backed securities of
$126.2 million, or 17.6%, to $844.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $718.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is due
primarily to the implementation of ongoing leveraging strategies
within board approved risk parameters. The yield earned on
mortgage-backed securities increased 25 basis points to
4.51% for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 4.26% for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest income on deposits in other financial institutions
decreased $749,000, or 18.2%, to $3.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $4.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of
deposits in other financial institutions increased
$5.0 million, or 5.4%, to $97.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, from $92.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The yield on deposits
54
in other financial institutions decreased 100 basis points,
or 22.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 4.46%
for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to
general decline in the interest rate environment in 2008.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$580,000, or 2.01%, to $28.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from $28.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The decrease resulted from an
increase of $47.7 million, or 4.6% in the average balance
of interest-bearing liabilities being more than offset by a
decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of
18 basis points, or 6.5%, to 2.59% for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from 2.77% for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits decreased
$5.2 million, or 22.1%, to $18.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $23.8 million,
for the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease was due
to a decrease in average interest bearing deposits of
$101.6 million, or 11.1%, to $813.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $914.8 for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in average
interest-bearing deposits was the result of the Company
maintaining its deposit pricing discipline in 2008, and choosing
not to compete on interest rate, in certain circumstances. In
the latter part 2008, pricing competition somewhat
subsided, depositor awareness of a financial institutions
financial strength increased, and the introduction by the
Company of a competitively priced money market account, and
statement savings account, were the primary reasons that our
year end deposit balances increasing to over $1 billion.
The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased
32 basis points, or 12.3%, to 2.28% for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to 2.60% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The rate paid on certificates of deposit
decreased 91 basis points, or 20.9%, to 3.44% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 4.35%, for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The rate paid on savings, NOW, and
money market accounts increased 53 basis points, or 67.1%,
to 1.32% for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared
to 0.79%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to the
introduction of competitively priced money market and statement
savings accounts in the latter part of 2008.
Interest expense on borrowings (repurchase agreements and other
borrowings) increased $4.6 million, or 91.9%, to
$9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $5.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The average balance of borrowings increased
$149.3 million, or 116.7%, to $277.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $127.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The average balance of
borrowings increased due to the Company implementing securities
leverage strategies within board approved risk parameters in
2008. The average rate paid on borrowings decreased
46 basis points to 3.51%, or 11.6%, for the year ended
December 31, 2008, from 3.97% for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Net Interest Income. The increase in net
interest income of $9.9 million, or 26.9%, for the year
ended December 31, 2008, was primarily the result of an
increase in average interest-earning assets of
$207.2 million, or 16.1%, coupled with an increase in the
net interest margin of 26 basis points, or 9.1%, from 2.87%
to 3.13%. The change in average interest-earning assets and the
net interest margin, for the current year was due partially to
the Companys completion of its stock issuance in November
2007, resulting in gross proceeds of $192.7 million, which
included $82.4 million in transfers from deposit accounts.
The Company deployed the net proceeds into loans, short-term
investments, and securities.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a
provision for loan losses of $5.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, and $1.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. We had charge-offs of
$1.9 million and $836,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The allowance for
loans losses was $8.8 million, or 1.49% of total loans
receivable at December 31, 2008, compared to
$5.6 million, or 1.33% of total loans receivable at
December 31, 2007. The increase in the provision for loan
losses was due primarily to loan growth, provisions for impaired
loans, and increases in certain general loss factors utilized in
managements calculation of the allowance for loan losses
in response to continued deterioration in general real estate
collateral values and weakness in the overall economy.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income
decreased $3.3 million or 35.1%, to $6.2 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, from $9.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease was
primarily attributable to a $4.3 million gain on the sale
of two branch offices and associated deposit relationships
recognized in March 2007. Non-interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2008, also
55
included market losses of $1.3 million on trading
securities as compared to $71,000 in market gains for the year
ended December 31, 2007. These decreases were partially
offset by the recognition of a $2.5 million nontaxable
death benefit realized on bank owned life insurance for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense
decreased $11.1 million, or 30.9%, to $24.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, from
$36.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
This decrease was primarily attributable to the contribution of
shares of our common stock and cash with a value of
$12.0 million to the Northfield Bank Foundation during the
fourth quarter of 2007. In addition, compensation and employee
benefits decreased by $962,000, to $11.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $12.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease was
primarily related to $1.3 million in market losses on
trading securities utilized to fund the Companys deferred
compensation plan for certain officers and directors who chose
to defer all or a portion of their compensation from the
Company. The market losses recorded as a reduction to
non-interest income have the direct result of reducing amounts
owed to the deferred compensation plan participants. Excluding
this adjustment, compensation and employee benefits expense
increased approximately $338,000, or 2.6%, and was primarily the
result on annual cost of living, merit, and competitive market
adjustments to salaries.
Occupancy, and furniture and equipment expense increased
$946,000, or 24.2%, to $4.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as compared to $3.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007. The increases were due to the
occupancy of our new back office operations center and
depreciation on capital improvements. Professional fees
increased $366,000, or 30.0%, to $1.6 million, for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to $1.2 million,
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in
professional fees was due primarily to additional costs of being
a public company, third party consultants utilized to assist the
Company in complying with internal control reporting
requirements under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, and
third-party consultation related to the implementation of our
equity incentive plan.
Income Tax Expense. The Company recorded a
provision for income taxes of $7.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008, as compared to a benefit of
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The
increase in income tax expense of $8.7 million was due
primarily to the reversal of $4.5 million in state and
local income tax liabilities, net of federal taxes for the year
ended December 31, 2007. In 2007, the Company concluded an
audit by the State of New York with respect to the
Companys combined state tax returns for years 2000 through
2006. In addition, the increase in income tax expense for the
year ended December 31, 2008, was due to an increased level
of taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
compared to year ended December 31, 2007.
56
Average Balances and Yields. The following
tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and
costs, and certain other information for the years indicated. No
tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as we had no
tax-free interest-earning assets during the years. All average
balances are daily average balances based upon amortized costs.
Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average
balances. The yields set forth below include the effect of
deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or
accreted to interest income or interest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
653,748
|
|
|
$
|
38,889
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
$
|
503,897
|
|
|
$
|
31,617
|
|
|
|
6.27
|
%
|
|
$
|
423,947
|
|
|
$
|
28,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
920,785
|
|
|
|
42,256
|
|
|
|
4.59
|
|
|
|
844,435
|
|
|
|
38,072
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
718,279
|
|
|
|
30,576
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
126,954
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
35,977
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
|
|
45,077
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
4.66
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
7,428
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
|
|
|
11,653
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
6,486
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
83,159
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
97,223
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
92,202
|
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
|
4.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
1,792,074
|
|
|
|
85,568
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
1,493,185
|
|
|
|
75,049
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
|
|
1,285,991
|
|
|
|
65,702
|
|
|
|
5.11
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
|
|
87,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,879,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,573,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,352,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW, and money market accounts
|
|
$
|
566,894
|
|
|
|
6,046
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
$
|
445,382
|
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
450,212
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
509,610
|
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
367,806
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
3.44
|
|
|
|
464,552
|
|
|
|
20,212
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,076,504
|
|
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
813,188
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
914,764
|
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
297,365
|
|
|
|
10,763
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
277,227
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
127,926
|
|
|
|
5,073
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,373,869
|
|
|
|
28,977
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
1,090,415
|
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
1,042,690
|
|
|
|
28,836
|
|
|
|
2.77
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
99,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
14,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,487,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
391,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,879,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,573,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,352,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
Net interest-earning assets(2)
|
|
$
|
418,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
402,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
130.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the
weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the
weighted average rate of interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning
assets less total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(3) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by
average total interest-earning assets. |
Rate/Volume
Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and
volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The
rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate
(changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column
shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in
volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents
the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table,
57
changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be
segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the
changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Due to
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Due to
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
8,811
|
|
|
$
|
(1,539
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,272
|
|
|
$
|
4,845
|
|
|
$
|
(1,626
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,219
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,494
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
4,184
|
|
|
|
5,608
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
|
|
7,496
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
133
|
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(2,132
|
)
|
|
|
(2,559
|
)
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
13,799
|
|
|
|
(3,280
|
)
|
|
|
10,519
|
|
|
|
10,525
|
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
9,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW and money market accounts
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
4,043
|
|
|
|
(4,531
|
)
|
|
|
(488
|
)
|
|
|
(3,770
|
)
|
|
|
(3,786
|
)
|
|
|
(7,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
4,638
|
|
|
|
(4,946
|
)
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
|
|
(3,808
|
)
|
|
|
(1,433
|
)
|
|
|
(5,241
|
)
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
5,168
|
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
5,360
|
|
|
|
(4,639
|
)
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
1,360
|
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
$
|
8,439
|
|
|
$
|
1,359
|
|
|
$
|
9,798
|
|
|
$
|
9,165
|
|
|
$
|
762
|
|
|
$
|
9,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
Quality
General. One of the Companys key
objectives has been and continues to be to maintain a high level
of asset quality. In addition to maintaining sound credit
standards for new loan originations, the Bank employs proactive
collection and workout processes associated with delinquent or
problem loans. The Bank actively markets properties that it
acquires through foreclosure or otherwise in the loan collection
process.
Delinquent Loans and Non-performing
Loans. Non-performing loans increased
$32.2 million, or 333.0%, from $9.7 million at
December 31, 2008, to $41.8 million at
December 31, 2009. The following table details
non-performing loans at December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
28,802
|
|
|
|
4,391
|
|
One-to four-family residential
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
|
|
2,812
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,822
|
|
|
|
9,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, loans are placed on non-accruing status when they
become 90 days or more delinquent, and remain on
non-accrual status until they are brought current, have six
months of performance under the loan
58
terms, and factors indicating reasonable doubt about the timely
collection of payments no longer exist. Therefore, loans may be
current in accordance with their loan terms, or may be less than
90 days delinquent and still be on a non-accruing status.
The following table details the delinquency status of
non-performing loans at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-30
|
|
|
31-89
|
|
|
90+
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
2,585
|
|
|
|
10,480
|
|
|
|
15,737
|
|
|
|
28,802
|
|
One -to- four family residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
5,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
2,118
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
$
|
9,981
|
|
|
|
11,402
|
|
|
|
20,439
|
|
|
|
41,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in non-performing loans is primarily attributable
to an increase of $24.4 million in non-performing
commercial real estate loans from December 31, 2008, to
December 31, 2009. During 2009, fifteen commercial real
estate loans totaling $26.3 million were placed on
non-accrual status, while one loan that was previously
classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2008 was
reclassified to other real estate owned. The increase in
non-performing loans also is attributable to an increase of
$4.0 million in construction and land loans over the same
time period. During 2009, six construction and land loans
totaling $6.8 million were placed on non-accrual status,
while one loan that was previously classified as non-accrual at
December 31, 2008, was sold.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had $28.3 million of
accruing loans that were 30 to 89 days delinquent, as
compared to $6.2 million at December 31, 2008.
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements increased
to $10.7 million at December 31, 2009, from
$1.0 million at December 31, 2008. During the year
ended December 31, 2009, the Company entered into eight
troubled debt restructurings totaling $9.8 million that
were classified as non-accrual at December 31, 2009.
In addition, the Company entered into six troubled debt
restructuring agreements totaling $7.3 million for which
interest is still accruing at December 31, 2009. The table
below sets forth the amounts and categories of the troubled debt
restructurings as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Non-Accruing
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Non-Accruing
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
3,960
|
|
|
$
|
5,499
|
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,717
|
|
|
$
|
7,250
|
|
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increases in delinquencies and non-performing loans has been
directly related to the current economic downturn. As a result
of increased unemployment rates, and decreasing real estate
values, delinquencies and non-accrual loans have risen from
December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009. These factors
have attributed to the growth in the Companys allowance
for loan losses as detailed below.
59
The allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of
year decreased from 91.07% at December 31, 2008 to 36.86%
at December 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily
attributable to an increase in non-performing loans of
$32.2 million, from $9.6 million at December 31,
2008, to $41.8 million at December 31, 2009, partially
offset by an increase of $6.6 million, or 75.6%, in the
allowance for loan losses over the same time period. As
previously discussed, the increase in non-accrual loans was
primarily attributable to increases in commercial real estate,
and to a lesser extent, construction and land loans during the
same time period. These loans were secured by real estate with
either current appraisals, or appraisals that are relatively
current (within 18 months) and have been adjusted downward
when appropriate by management for perceived declines in real
estate values. Generally loans are charged down to the appraised
values less costs to sell which reduces the coverage ratio of
the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans.
The allowance for loan losses to loans
held-for-investment,
net, increased to 2.11% at December 31, 2009, from 1.49% at
December 31, 2008. This increase was attributable to an
increase of $6.6 million, or 75.6%, in the allowance for
loan losses from December 31, 2008, to December 31,
2009, partially offset by an increase in the loan portfolio over
the same time period. The increase in the Companys
allowance for loan losses during the year is primarily
attributable to specific reserves on impaired loans, and an
increase in general loss factors related to increases in
non-accrual loans, loans 30 to 89 days delinquent, and declines
in general economic conditions and real estate values.
Impairment losses on specific loans increased $2.1 million,
or 674.3%, from $310,000 for the year ended December 31,
2008, to $2.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2009. At December 31, 2008, the Company had four loans
classified as impaired and recorded impairment losses totaling
$310,000 on two of the four impaired loans. At December 31,
2009, the Company had 30 loans classified as impaired and
recorded a total of $2.4 million of specific reserves on
eleven of the 30 impaired loans. The increase in specific
reserves recorded on impaired loans was attributable to an
increase in impaired loans coupled with decreasing values of the
underlying loan collateral.
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for
loan losses, by loan type, for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four Family
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Lines of
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
and Land
|
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Industrial
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
5,030
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,176
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,348
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
8,403
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
1,877
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
15,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
recorded charge-offs of $2.4 million, an increase of
$462,000, or 23.8%, as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2008. The increase in charge-offs was
primarily attributable to a $346,000 increase in charge-offs
related to commercial real estate loans.
60
As a result of higher charge-offs, an increase in non-accrual
commercial real estate loans and commercial real estate loans
past due 30 to 89 days, coupled with the general decline in
real estate values and the current economic downturn, the
Companys historical and general loss factors have
increased, thus increasing the allowance for loan losses
allocated to commercial real estate loans by $3.2 million,
or 62.3%, from $5.2 million December 31, 2008, to
$8.4 million at December 31, 2009. In addition, the
Company experienced increased charge-offs of approximately
$164,000 in multifamily real estate loans, an increase of 100%
from the year ended December 31, 2008. As a result of the
charge-offs incurred, as well as increased levels of multifamily
real estate loans on non-accrual status and 30 to 89 days
past due, coupled with the general decline in real estate values
and the current economic downturn, the Companys historical
and general loss factors have increased, thus increasing the
allowance for loan losses allocated to multifamily real estate
loans by $1.1 million, or 136.8%, from $788,000 at
December 31, 2008, to $1.9 million at
December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses allocated
to commercial and industrial loans and construction and land
loans also increased $1.4 million and $427,000,
respectively, from December 31, 2008, to December 31,
2009. These increases were attributable to increased historical
and general loss factors which resulted from additional
charge-offs taken during the year ended December 31, 2009,
coupled with increased levels of non-accrual loans, and loans
that are 30 to 89 days past due, and the current economic
downturn. The Company could experience an increase in its
allowance for loan losses in future periods if charge-offs and
non-performing loans continue to increase.
Management
of Market Risk
General. A majority of our assets and
liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most
significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our
assets, consisting primarily of mortgage-related assets and
loans, generally have longer maturities than our liabilities,
which consist primarily of deposits and wholesale funding. As a
result, a principal part of our business strategy involves
managing interest rate risk and limiting the exposure of our net
interest income to changes in market interest rates.
Accordingly, our board of directors has established a management
asset liability committee, comprised of our Treasurer, who
chairs this Committee, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief
Financial Officer, our Chief Lending Officer, and our Executive
Vice President of Operations. This committee is responsible for,
among other things, evaluating the interest rate risk inherent
in our assets and liabilities, for recommending to the asset
liability management committee of our board of directors
the level of risk that is appropriate given our business
strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and
performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent
with the guidelines approved by the board of directors.
We seek to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize
the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest
rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability management, we
currently use the following strategies to manage our interest
rate risk:
|
|
|
|
|
originate commercial real estate loans and multifamily real
estate loans that generally have interest rates that reset every
five years;
|
|
|
|
invest in shorter maturity investment grade corporate securities
and mortgage-related securities; and
|
|
|
|
obtain general financing through lower cost deposits and
wholesale funding and repurchase agreements.
|
Net Portfolio Value Analysis. We compute the
net present value of our interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities (net portfolio value or
NPV) over a range of assumed market interest rates.
Our simulation model uses a discounted cash flow analysis to
measure the net portfolio value. We estimate the economic value
of these assets and liabilities under the assumption that
interest rates experience an instantaneous, parallel, and
sustained increase of 100, 200, or 300 basis points, or a
decrease of 100 and 200 which is based on the current interest
rate environment. A basis point equals one-hundredth of one
percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An
increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for
example, a 100 basis point increase in the Change in
Interest Rates column below.
Net Interest Income Analysis. We also analyze
our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through our net
interest income model. Net interest income is the difference
between the interest income we earn on our
61
interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the
interest we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as
deposits and borrowings. We estimate what our net interest
income would be for a twelve-month period. We then calculate
what the net interest income would be for the same period under
the assumption that interest rates experience an instantaneous
and sustained increase of 100, 200, or 300 basis points or
a decrease of 100 and 200 which is based on the current interest
rate environment.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2009, our
calculation of the estimated changes in our net portfolio value,
net present value ratio, and percent change in net interest
income that would result from the designated instantaneous and
sustained changes in interest rates. Computations of prospective
effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market
interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and should
not be relied on as indicative of actual results (dollars in
thousands.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
Present
|
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
NPV/Present
|
|
|
Net Interest
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Change In
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Income Percent
|
|
(Basis Points)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
NPV
|
|
|
NPV
|
|
|
Assets Ratio
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
+300
|
|
|
$
|
1,884,900
|
|
|
$
|
1,502,093
|
|
|
$
|
382,807
|
|
|
$
|
(62,473
|
)
|
|
|
20.31
|
%
|
|
|
(5.24
|
)%
|
|
+200
|
|
|
|
1,931,727
|
|
|
|
1,524,764
|
|
|
|
406,963
|
|
|
|
(38,317
|
)
|
|
|
21.07
|
%
|
|
|
(3.36
|
)%
|
|
+100
|
|
|
|
1,977,999
|
|
|
|
1,548,205
|
|
|
|
429,794
|
|
|
|
(15,486
|
)
|
|
|
21.73
|
%
|
|
|
(1.36
|
)%
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,017,733
|
|
|
|
1,572,453
|
|
|
|
445,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
−100
|
|
|
|
2,054,930
|
|
|
|
1,596,234
|
|
|
|
458,696
|
|
|
|
13,416
|
|
|
|
22.32
|
%
|
|
|
2.48
|
%
|
|
−200
|
|
|
|
2,072,124
|
|
|
|
1,618,733
|
|
|
|
453,391
|
|
|
|
8,111
|
|
|
|
21.88
|
%
|
|
|
(2.39
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes an instantaneous and sustained uniform change in
interest rates at all maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
NPV includes non-interest earning assets and liabilities. |
The table above indicates that at December 31, 2009, in the
event of a 200 basis point decrease in interest rates, we
would experience a 1.82% increase in estimated net portfolio
value and a 2.39% decrease in net interest income. In the event
of a 300 basis point increase in interest rates, we would
experience a 14.03% decrease in net portfolio value and a 5.24%
decrease in net interest income. Our policies provide that, in
the event of a 300 basis point increase/decrease or less in
interest rates, our net present value ratio should decrease by
no more than 400 basis points and in the event of a
200 basis point increase/decrease, our projected net
interest income should decrease by no more than 20%.
Additionally, our policy states that our net portfolio value
should be at least 8.5% of total assets before and after such
shock at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2009, we
were in compliance with all board approved policies with respect
to interest rate risk management.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in
determining interest rate risk through changes in net portfolio
value and net interest income. Our model requires us to make
certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in
which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market
interest rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value and net
interest income information presented assume that the
composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities
existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the
period being measured and assume that a particular change in
interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve
regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and
liabilities. Accordingly, although interest rate risk
calculations provide an indication of our interest rate risk
exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are
not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the
effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest
income and will differ from actual results.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to fund assets and meet obligations as
they come due. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit
inflows, loan repayments, borrowings through repurchase
agreements and advances from money center banks and the Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York, and repayments, maturities and
62
sales of securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization
of loans and securities are reasonably predictable sources of
funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly
influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and
competition. Our board asset and liability management committee
is responsible for establishing and monitoring our liquidity
targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient
liquidity exists for meeting the borrowing needs and deposit
withdrawals of our customers as well as unanticipated
contingencies. We seek to maintain a ratio of liquid assets (not
subject to pledge) as a percentage of deposits and borrowings of
35% or greater. At December 31, 2009, this ratio was
70.83%. We believe that we had sufficient sources of liquidity
to satisfy our short- and long-term liquidity needs.
We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon
our assessment of:
|
|
|
|
|
expected loan demand;
|
|
|
|
expected deposit flows;
|
|
|
|
yields available on interest-earning deposits and
securities; and
|
|
|
|
the objectives of our asset/liability management program.
|
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents, and
unpledged mortgage-related securities issued or guaranteed by
the U.S. Government, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac, that we
can either borrow against or sell. We also have the ability to
surrender bank owned life insurance contracts. The surrender of
these contracts would subject the Company to income taxes and
penalties for increases in the cash surrender values over the
original premium payments.
The Company had the following primary sources of liquidity at
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42,544
|
|
Unpledged mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
481,393
|
|
(Issued or Guaranteed By the
U.S. Government, Fannie Mae
or, Freddie Mac)
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, we had $4.3 million in
outstanding loan commitments. In addition, we had
$36.0 million in unused lines of credit to borrowers.
Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31,
2009, totaled $518.0 million, or 39.3% of total deposits.
If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to
seek other sources of funds, including loan sales, other deposit
products, including replacement certificates of deposit,
securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase
agreements), and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York and other borrowing sources. Depending on market
conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such
deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the
certificates of deposit due on or before December 31, 2010.
We believe, based on past experience, that a significant portion
of such deposits will remain with us, and we have the ability to
attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates
offered.
The Company has a detailed contingency funding plan that is
reviewed and reported to the board asset liability management
committee on at least a quarterly basis. This plan includes
monitoring cash on a daily basis to determine the liquidity
needs of the Bank. Additionally, management performs a stress
test on the Banks retail deposits and wholesale funding
sources in several scenarios on a quarterly basis. The stress
scenarios include deposit attrition of up to 50%, and selling
our securities
available-for-sale
portfolio at a discount of 10% to its current estimated fair
value. The Bank continues to maintain significant liquidity
under all stress scenarios.
Northfield Bank is subject to various regulatory capital
requirements, including a risk-based capital measure. The
risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of
capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by
assigning assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk
categories. At December 31, 2009, Northfield Bank exceeded
all regulatory capital requirements and is considered well
capitalized under regulatory guidelines. See
Supervision and Regulation Federal Banking
Regulation Capital Requirements and
Note 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
63
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual
Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider,
we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit,
and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations
represent our potential future cash requirements, a significant
portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being
drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit
policies and approval process applicable to loans we originate.
In addition, we routinely enter into commitments to sell
mortgage loans; such amounts are not significant to our
operations. For additional information, see Note 11 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary
course of our operations we enter into certain contractual
obligations. Such obligations include leases for premises and
equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit
liabilities, and agreements with respect to investments.
The following table summarizes our significant fixed and
determinable contractual obligations and other funding needs by
payment date at December 31, 2009. The payment amounts
represent those amounts due to the recipient and do not include
any unamortized premiums or discounts or other similar carrying
amount adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
One to Three
|
|
|
Three to Five
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
$
|
61,382
|
|
|
$
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
118,800
|
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
$
|
272,682
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
4,110
|
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
|
|
22,686
|
|
|
|
32,999
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
3,013
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
517,986
|
|
|
|
33,104
|
|
|
|
28,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
581,910
|
|
|
$
|
127,977
|
|
|
$
|
151,919
|
|
|
$
|
26,261
|
|
|
$
|
888,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit(2)
|
|
$
|
43,472
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes repurchase agreements, Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York advances, and accrued interest payable at December 31,
2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes unused lines of credit which are assumed to be funded
within the year. |
Impact of
Recent Accounting Standards and Interpretations
Effective July 1, 2009, FASB established the Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) as the source of authoritative
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles recognized by
the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretative releases of the SEC under authority of federal
securities laws are also sources of authoritative guidance for
SEC registrants. The ASC did not have a significant effect on
the Companys consolidated financial statements.
ASC 810, Consolidation, replaces the quantitative-based
risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise,
if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable
interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which
enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable
interest entity that most significantly effect the entitys
economic performance and (i) the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or (ii) the right to receive benefits
from the entity. The pronouncement is effective January 1,
2010, and is not expected to have a significant effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, improves the
information a reporting entity provides in its financial
statements about a transfer of financial assets, including the
effect of a transfer on an entitys financial position,
financial performance and cash flows and the transferors
continuing involvement in the transferred assets. ASC 860
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity
and changes the guidance for evaluation for consolidation. This
pronouncement is effective January 1, 2010, and is not
expected to have a significant effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
64
ASC 855, Subsequent Events, establishes general standards
of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or
available to be issued. ASC 855 sets forth (i) the period
after the balance sheet date during which management of a
reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may
occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity
should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements and
(iii) the disclosures that an entity should make about
events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet
date. ASC 855 was effective for the period ended June 30,
2009, and did not have a significant effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-09
under ASC 855 removes the requirement for an SEC filer to
disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between
subtopic
855-10 and
the SECs requirements. The new guidance did not have a
significant effect on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need
to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings
per share. This ASC was effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
The adoption of ASC 260 did not have a material affect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
These following three ASCs (ASC 820, ASC 825, and ASC
320) were effective for the period ended June 30, 2009.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
provides guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and
level of activity for the asset or liability have decreased
significantly. ASC 820 also provides guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The
adoption of ASC 820 did not have a significant effect on
the Companys consolidated financial statements other than
additional disclosures.
ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosures
about fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting
periods of publicly traded companies that previously were only
required to be disclosed in annual financial statements. The
adoption of ASC 825 did not have a significant effect on
the Companys consolidated financial statements other than
additional disclosures.
ASC 320, Investments Debt and Equity
Securities, amends previous
other-than-temporary
impairment guidance in generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) for debt securities to make the guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of
other-than-temporary
impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. This ASC does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to
other-than-temporary
impairments of equity securities. The adoption of ASC 320
resulted in $1.2 million of impairment charges being
recorded in other comprehensive income.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2009-05
under ASC 820 provides clarification for circumstances in which
a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability
is not available. In such circumstances, a reporting entity is
required to measure fair value using one or more of the
following techniques: (i) a valuation technique that uses:
(a) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded
as an asset; or (b) quoted prices for similar liabilities
or similar liabilities when traded as assets; or
(ii) another valuation technique that is consistent with
the principles of ASC 820, such as an income approach or a
market approach. The update clarifies that when estimating the
fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to
include a separate adjustment relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The new
authoritative accounting guidance also clarifies that the quoted
price for an identical liability traded as an asset in an active
market would also be a Level 1 measurement, provided that
the quoted price does not need to be adjusted to reflect factors
specific to the asset that do no apply to the fair value
measurement of the liability. The new guidance did not have a
significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-06
under ASC 820 requires new disclosures and clarifies certain
existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.
Specifically, the update requires an entity to
65
disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and
out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and
describe the reasons for such transfers. A reporting entity is
required to present separately information about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair
value measurements using Level 3 inputs. In addition, the
update clarifies the following requirements of the existing
disclosure: (i) for the purposes of reporting fair value
measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a
reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the
appropriate classes of assets; and (ii) a reporting entity
is required to include disclosures about the valuation
techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both
recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The
amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
separate disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. The new guidance is not
expected to have a significant impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Update
No. 2009-12
under ASC 820 amends Subtopic
820-10 to
permit a reporting entity to measure the fair value of certain
investments on the basis of net asset value per share of the
investment (or its equivalent). This Update also requires new
disclosure, by major category of investments, about the
attributes of investments within the scope of this amendment to
the Codification. The new guidance under ASC 820 became
effective for financial statements issued for periods ending
after December 15, 2009. The Companys adoption of
this new authoritative guidance did not have a significant
impact on the Companys financial statements or its
disclosures at December 31, 2009.
ASC 805, Business Combinations, applies to all
transactions and other events in which one entity obtains
control over one or more other businesses. The new guidance
requires an acquirer, upon initially obtaining control of
another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the
acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be
recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition
rather than at a later date when the amount of that
consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable doubt.
This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process
previously required whereby the cost of an acquisition was
allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities
assumed based on their estimated fair value. The new guidance
requires acquirers to expense acquisition-related costs as
incurred rather than allocating such costs to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, as was previously the case.
Specific requirements must be met in order to accrue for a
restructuring plan in purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition
contingencies are to be recognized at fair value, unless it is a
non-contractual contingency that is not likely to materialize,
in which case, nothing should be recognized in purchase
accounting, and, instead, that contingency would be subject to
the probable and estimable recognition criteria of
contingencies. The new guidance is effective for all business
combinations closing after January 1, 2009 and will impact
the Banks accounting for business combinations after such
date.
Additional new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC 805,
requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination that arise from contingencies be recognized
at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated. If fair
value of such an asset or liability cannot be reasonably
estimated, the asset or liability would generally be recognized
in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies. This new
guidance removes subsequent accounting guidance for assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies and requires entities to
develop a systematic and rational basis for subsequently
measuring and accounting for assets and liabilities arising from
contingencies. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to
disclose an estimate of the range of outcomes of recognized
contingencies at the acquisition date. For unrecognized
contingencies, entities are required to include only the
disclosures required under ASC 450. The new guidance also
requires that contingent consideration arrangements of an
acquiree assumed by the acquirer in a business combination be
treated as contingent consideration of the acquirer and should
be initially and subsequently measured at fair value. ASC 805 is
effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies
in business combinations after January 1, 2009.
66
Impact of
Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes have
been prepared in accordance with GAAP. GAAP generally requires
the measurement of financial position and operating results in
terms of historical dollars without consideration for changes in
the relative purchasing power of money over time due to
inflation. The effect of inflation is reflected in the increased
cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets
and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result,
changes in market interest rates have a greater effect on our
performance than inflation.
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
For information regarding market risk see
Item 7-
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations Management of
Market Risk.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
67
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc, and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of evaluating
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities due to the adoption of new
accounting requirements issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, as of April 1, 2009.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 16, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Short Hills, New Jersey
March 16, 2010
68
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries:
We have audited Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In
addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and our
report dated March 16, 2010 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Short Hills, New Jersey
March 16, 2010
69
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS:
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
10,183
|
|
|
|
9,014
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
32,361
|
|
|
|
41,114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale,
at estimated fair value (encumbered $219,446 in 2009 and
$183,711 in 2008)
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $6,930 and $14,588 in
2009 and 2008, respectively) (encumbered $0 in 2009 and $1,241
in 2008)
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
14,479
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
8,054
|
|
|
|
8,319
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
43,751
|
|
|
|
42,001
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
12,676
|
|
|
|
8,899
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
16,159
|
|
|
|
16,159
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
14,930
|
|
|
|
12,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
LIABILITIES:
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,316,885
|
|
|
|
1,024,439
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
79,424
|
|
|
|
162,084
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
13,668
|
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,610,734
|
|
|
|
1,371,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 90,000,000 shares
authorized, 45,628,211 and 44,803,061 shares issued at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, 43,912,148 and
44,803,061 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
202,479
|
|
|
|
199,453
|
|
Unallocated common stock held by employee stock ownership plan
|
|
|
(15,807
|
)
|
|
|
(16,391
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
212,196
|
|
|
|
203,085
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Treasury stock at cost; 1,716,063 and 0 shares at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,002,274
|
|
|
|
1,757,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
70
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
38,889
|
|
|
|
31,617
|
|
|
|
28,398
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
42,256
|
|
|
|
38,072
|
|
|
|
30,576
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York dividends
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
Deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
4,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
85,568
|
|
|
|
75,049
|
|
|
|
65,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
10,763
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
5,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
28,977
|
|
|
|
28,256
|
|
|
|
28,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
56,591
|
|
|
|
46,793
|
|
|
|
36,866
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
47,553
|
|
|
|
41,711
|
|
|
|
35,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and service charges for customer services
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
Income on bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
1,750
|
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
Gain (loss) on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
(1,318
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment and deposit relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,308
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment losses on securities
|
|
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income
|
|
|
5,393
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
16,896
|
|
|
|
11,723
|
|
|
|
12,685
|
|
Director compensation
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
3,864
|
|
|
|
3,062
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
852
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
3,021
|
|
|
|
2,425
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
Contribution to Northfield Bank Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,418
|
|
|
|
2,868
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
|
34,254
|
|
|
|
24,852
|
|
|
|
35,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic and
diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic(1)
|
|
|
42,405,774
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
|
|
43,076,586
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
42,532,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share is calculated for the period that the
Companys shares of common stock were outstanding
(November 8, 2007, through December 31, 2007). The net
loss for this period was $1,501,000 and the weighted average
common shares outstanding were 43,076,586. Per share data and
shares outstanding information is not applicable prior to
November 8, 2007 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
71
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Held by the
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Employee Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Income (Loss),
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Ownership Plan
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,731
|
|
|
|
(14,247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
year (net of tax of $7,069)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,897
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
(net of tax of $4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $158)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution from Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Sale of 19,265,316 shares of common stock, issuance of
24,641,584 shares to the mutual holding company, and
issuance of 896,061 shares to Northfield Bank Foundation
|
|
|
44,802,961
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
198,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,552
|
|
Purchase of common stock by the ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
44,803,061
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
199,395
|
|
|
|
(16,977
|
)
|
|
|
187,992
|
|
|
|
(3,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
year (net of tax of $2,434)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
(net of tax of $6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $28)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.04 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
44,803,061
|
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
|
199,453
|
|
|
|
(16,391
|
)
|
|
|
203,085
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains on securities arising during the
year (net of tax of $8,438)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,075
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income
(net of tax of $35)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Post retirement benefits adjustment (net of tax $26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI impairment included in net
income (net of tax of $70)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,942
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($0.16 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
825,150
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Treasury stock (average cost of $11.61 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
45,628,211
|
|
|
$
|
456
|
|
|
|
202,479
|
|
|
|
(15,807
|
)
|
|
|
212,196
|
|
|
|
12,145
|
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
72
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
Accretion of discounts, and deferred loan fees, net of
amortization of premiums
|
|
|
(1,486
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
Income on bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(1,750
|
)
|
|
|
(4,235
|
)
|
|
|
(1,694
|
)
|
Contribution of common stock to Northfield Bank Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
Net gain on sale of loans
held-for-sale
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of loans
held-for-sale
|
|
|
7,509
|
|
|
|
4,092
|
|
|
|
6,265
|
|
Origination of loans
held-for-sale
|
|
|
(7,371
|
)
|
|
|
(3,793
|
)
|
|
|
(6,350
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on securities transactions, net
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Net impairment losses on securities recognized in earnings
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of deposit relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,660
|
)
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
Net purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
(5,283
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
Prepaid FDIC assessment
|
|
|
(5,736
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESOP and stock compensation expense
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(4,938
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(10,396
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
2,831
|
|
|
|
(6,253
|
)
|
|
|
5,443
|
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
15,164
|
|
|
|
5,333
|
|
|
|
11,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in loans receivable
|
|
|
(108,385
|
)
|
|
|
(163,643
|
)
|
|
|
(16,029
|
)
|
Purchases of loans
|
|
|
(35,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemptions (purchases) of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
stock, net
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
|
|
(2,708
|
)
|
|
|
484
|
|
Purchases of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
(655,765
|
)
|
|
|
(421,696
|
)
|
|
|
(309,396
|
)
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
500,518
|
|
|
|
270,091
|
|
|
|
234,457
|
|
Principal payments and maturities on securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
5,214
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
3,293
|
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
3,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of certificates of deposit in other financial
institutions
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
(118,653
|
)
|
|
|
(50,500
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of certificates of deposit in other
financial institutions
|
|
|
53,716
|
|
|
|
89,500
|
|
|
|
31,200
|
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
Cash received from bank owned life insurance contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and improvements of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(5,456
|
)
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(236,576
|
)
|
|
|
(337,413
|
)
|
|
|
(106,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
292,446
|
|
|
|
147,214
|
|
|
|
(3,560
|
)
|
Deposit relationship sold, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,985
|
)
|
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,241
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock for ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes
and insurance
|
|
|
(3,066
|
)
|
|
|
2,980
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Repayments under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
other borrowings
|
|
|
138,600
|
|
|
|
410,800
|
|
|
|
83,000
|
|
Repayments related to securities sold under agreements to
repurchase and other borrowings
|
|
|
(191,100
|
)
|
|
|
(203,000
|
)
|
|
|
(87,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
213,828
|
|
|
|
357,120
|
|
|
|
59,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(7,584
|
)
|
|
|
25,040
|
|
|
|
(35,536
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
60,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
29,334
|
|
|
|
27,322
|
|
|
|
28,657
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
10,351
|
|
|
|
11,316
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits utilized to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,359
|
|
Loans charged-off, net
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
73
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
|
|
(1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The following significant accounting and reporting policies of
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company), conform to U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or (GAAP), and are used in
preparing and presenting these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
(a)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the
accounts of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Northfield Investment, Inc. and Northfield Bank
(the Bank) and the Banks wholly-owned
significant subsidiaries, NSB Services Corp. and NSB Realty
Trust. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
In 1995, the Bank completed a Plan of Mutual Holding Company
Reorganization, utilizing a single-tier mutual holding company
structure. In a series of steps, the Bank formed a New
York-chartered mutual holding company (NSB Holding Corp.) which
owned 100% of the common stock of the Bank. In 2002, NSB Holding
Corp. formed Northfield Holdings Corp., a New York-chartered
stock corporation, and contributed 100% of the common stock of
the Bank into Northfield Holdings Corp. which owned 100% of the
common stock of Northfield Holdings Corp. In 2006, Northfield
Holdings Corp.s name was changed to Northfield Bancorp,
Inc. and Northfield Savings Banks name was changed to
Northfield Bank. In 2007, NSB Holdings Corp.s name was
changed to Northfield Bancorp, MHC.
As part of the stock issuance plan announced in April 2007,
Northfield Bank converted to a federally-charted savings bank
from a New York-chartered savings bank effective
November 6, 2007. Northfield Banks primary federal
regulator is the Office of Thrift Supervision (the
OTS) and was the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the FDIC) prior to our November 2007
conversion. Simultaneously with Northfield Banks
conversion, Northfield Bancorp, MHC and Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
converted to federal-chartered holding companies from New
York-chartered holding companies.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management
is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the
balance sheets and revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results may differ significantly from those
estimates and assumptions. A material estimate that is
particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term
is the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the
determination of this allowance, management generally obtains
independent appraisals for significant properties. Judgments
related to goodwill, and securities valuation and impairment
also are critical because they involve a higher degree of
complexity and subjectivity and require estimates and
assumptions about highly uncertain matters. Actual results may
differ from the estimates and assumptions.
Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank,
provides a full range of banking services primarily to
individuals and corporate customers in Richmond and Kings
Counties in New York, and Union and Middlesex Counties in New
Jersey. The Company also finances insurance premiums for
commercial customers throughout the contiguous United States.
The Company is subject to competition from other financial
institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state
agencies, and undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
74
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, due from banks,
federal funds sold, and interest-bearing deposits in other
financial institutions with an original term of three months or
less. Certificates of deposit with original maturities of
greater than three months are excluded from cash equivalents and
reported as a separate line item on the consolidated balance
sheets.
Securities are classified at the time of purchase, based on
managements intention, as securities held-to-maturity,
securities
available-for-sale,
or trading account securities. Securities
held-to-maturity
are those that management has the positive intent and ability to
hold until maturity. Securities
held-to-maturity
are carried at amortized cost, adjusted for amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts using the level-yield method
over the contractual term of the securities, adjusted for actual
prepayments. Trading securities are securities that are bought
and may be held for the purpose of selling them in the near
term. Trading securities are reported at estimated fair value,
with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a component
of gain (loss) on securities transactions, net in non-interest
income. Securities
available-for-sale
represents all securities not classified as either
held-to-maturity
or trading. Securities
available-for-sale
are carried at estimated fair value with unrealized holding
gains and losses (net of related tax effects) on such securities
excluded from earnings, but included as a separate component of
stockholders equity, titled Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). The cost of securities sold
is determined using the specific-identification method. Security
transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis. Our evaluation
of
other-than-temporary
impairment considers the duration and severity of the
impairment, our intent and ability to hold the securities and
our assessments of the reason for the decline in value and the
likelihood of a near-term recovery. If a determination is made
that a debt security is
other-than-temporarily
impaired, the Company will estimate the amount of the unrealized
loss that is attributable to credit and all other non-credit
related factors. The credit related component will be recognized
as an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge in non-interest income as a component of gain
(loss) on securities, net. The non-credit related component will
be recorded as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of tax. The estimated fair value of debt
securities, including mortgage-backed securities and corporate
debt obligations is furnished by an independent third party
pricing service. The third party pricing service primarily
utilizes pricing models and methodologies that incorporate
observable market inputs, including among other things,
benchmark yields, reported trades, and projected prepayment and
default rates. Management reviews the data and assumptions used
in pricing the securities by its third party provider for
reasonableness.
Net loans
held-for-investment
are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted by unamortized
premiums and unearned discounts, deferred origination fees and
certain direct origination costs, and the allowance for loan
losses. Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to
income as earned. Net loan origination fees/costs are deferred
and accreted/amortized to interest income over the loans
contractual life using the level-yield method, adjusted for
actual prepayments. Loans
held-for-sale
are designated at time of origination and generally consist of
fixed rate residential loans with terms of 15 years or more
and are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in
the aggregate. Gains are recognized on a settlement-date basis
and are determined by the difference between the net sales
proceeds and the carrying value of the loans, including any net
deferred fees or costs.
The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is
probable, based on current information, that the Company will
not collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual
terms of the loan agreement. The Company has defined the
population of impaired loans to be all non-accrual loans with an
outstanding balance of $500,000 or greater. Impaired loans are
individually assessed to determine that the
75
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
loans carrying value is not in excess of the expected
future cash flows, discounted at the loans original effective
interest rate, or the underlying collateral (less estimated
costs to sell) if the loan is collateral dependent. Impairments
are recognized through a charge to the provision for loan losses
for the amount that the loans carrying value exceeds the
discounted cash flow analysis or estimated fair value of
collateral (less estimated costs to sell) if the loan is
collateral dependent. Homogeneous loans with balances less than
$500,000 are collectively evaluated for impairment.
The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for
loan losses charged against income and is decreased by
charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loan losses are charged-off in
the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed
uncollectible. Generally, the Company will record a loan
charge-off (including a partial charge-off) to reduce a loan to
the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less cost
to sell, if it is determined that it is probable that recovery
will come primarily from the sale of such collateral. The
provision for loan losses is based on managements
evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance which considers,
among other things, impaired loans, past loan loss experience,
known and inherent risks in the portfolio, existing adverse
situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay,
and estimated value of any underlying collateral securing loans.
Additionally, management evaluates changes, if any, in
underwriting standards, collection, charge-off and recovery
practices, the nature or volume of the portfolio, lending staff,
concentration of loans, as well as current economic conditions,
and other relevant factors. Management believes the allowance
for loan losses is adequate to provide for probable and
reasonably estimatable losses at the date of the consolidated
balance sheets. The Company also maintains an allowance for
estimated losses on off-balance sheet credit risks related to
loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Management
utilizes a methodology similar to its allowance for loan loss
adequacy methodology to estimate losses on these commitments.
The allowance for estimated credit losses on off-balance sheet
commitments is included in other liabilities and any changes to
the allowance are recorded as a component of other non-interest
expense.
While management uses available information to recognize
probable and reasonably estimatable losses on loans, future
additions may be necessary based on changes in conditions,
including changes in economic conditions, particularly in
Richmond and Kings Counties in New York, and Union and Middlesex
Counties in New Jersey. Accordingly, as with most financial
institutions in the market area, the ultimate collectibility of
a substantial portion of the Companys loan portfolio is
susceptible to changes in conditions in the Companys
marketplace. In addition, future changes in laws and regulations
could make it more difficult for the Company to collect all
contractual amounts due on its loans and mortgage-backed
securities.
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of
their examination process, periodically review the
Companys allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may
require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance
based on their judgments about information available to them at
the time of their examination.
Troubled debt restructured loans are those loans whose terms
have been modified because of deterioration in the financial
condition of the borrower. Modifications could include extension
of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and
forgiveness of accrued interest
and/or
principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of
such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured
until paid in full or, if the obligation yields a market rate (a
rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing
to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with
comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which
the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has
performed under the modified terms for a six-month period. The
Company records an impairment charge equal to the difference
between the present value of estimated future cash flows under
the restructured terms discounted at the original loans
effective interest rate, and the original loans carrying value.
Changes in present values attributable to the passage of time
are recorded as a component of the provision for loan losses.
A loan is considered past due when it is not paid in accordance
with its contractual terms. The accrual of income on loans,
including impaired loans, and other loans in the process of
foreclosure, is generally
76
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days or more
delinquent, or when certain factors indicate that the ultimate
collection of principal and interest is in doubt. Loans on which
the accrual of income has been discontinued are designated as
non-accrual loans. All previously accrued interest is reversed
against interest income, and income is recognized subsequently
only in the period that cash is received, provided no principal
payments are due and the remaining principal balance outstanding
is deemed collectible. A non-accrual loan is not returned to
accrual status until both principal and interest payments are
brought current and factors indicating doubtful collection no
longer exist, including performance by the borrower under the
loan terms for a six-month period.
|
|
(f)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock
|
The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
(the FHLB), is required to hold shares of capital
stock in the FHLB as a condition to both becoming a member and
engaging in certain transactions with the FHLB. The minimum
investment requirement is determined by a membership
investment component and an activity-based
investment component. The membership investment component is the
greater of 0.20% of the Banks mortgage-related assets, as
defined by the FHLB, or $1,000. The activity-based investment
component is equal to 4.5% of the Banks outstanding
advances with the FHLB. The activity-based investment component
also considers other transactions, including assets originated
for or sold to the FHLB, and delivery commitments issued by the
FHLB. The Company currently does not enter into these other
types of transactions with the FHLB.
On a quarterly basis, we perform our
other-than-temporary
impairment analysis of FHLB stock, we evaluated, among other
things, (i) its earnings performance, including the
significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as
compared to the regulatory capital amount of the FHLB,
(ii) the commitment by the FHLB to continue dividend
payments, and (iii) the liquidity position of the FHLB. We
do not consider this security to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired at December 31, 2009.
|
|
(g)
|
Premises
and Equipment, Net
|
Premises and equipment, including leasehold improvements, are
carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment,
including capital leases, are computed on a straight-line basis
over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The
estimated useful lives of significant classes of assets are
generally as follows: buildings forty years;
furniture and equipment five to seven years; and
purchased computer software three years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the term of the
related lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
Major improvements are capitalized, while repairs and
maintenance costs are charged to operations as incurred. Upon
retirement or sale, any gain or loss is credited or charged to
operations.
|
|
(h)
|
Bank
Owned Life Insurance
|
The Company has purchased bank owned life insurance contracts to
help fund its obligations for certain employee benefit costs.
The Companys investment in such insurance contracts has
been reported in the consolidated balance sheets at their cash
surrender values. Changes in cash surrender values and death
benefit proceeds received in excess of the related cash
surrender values are recorded as non-interest income.
Goodwill is presumed to have an indefinite useful life and is
not amortized, but rather is tested, at least annually, for
impairment at the reporting unit level. For purposes of the
Companys goodwill impairment testing, management has
identified a single reporting unit. The Company uses the quoted
market price of its common stock on the impairment testing date
as the basis for estimating the fair value of the Companys
reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds
its carrying amount, further evaluation is not
77
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
necessary. However, if the fair value of the reporting unit is
less than its carrying amount, further evaluation is required to
compare the implied fair value of the reporting units
goodwill to its carrying amount to determine if a write-down of
goodwill is required. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying
value of goodwill totaled $16.2 million. The Company
performed its annual goodwill impairment test, as of
December 31, 2009, and determined the fair value of the
Companys one reporting unit to be in excess of its
carrying value. Accordingly, as of the annual impairment test
date, there was no indication of goodwill impairment. The
Company will test goodwill for impairment between annual test
dates if an event occurs or circumstances change that would
indicate the fair value of the reporting unit is below its
carrying amount. No events have occurred and no circumstances
have changed since the annual impairment test date that would
indicate the fair value of the reporting unit is below its
carrying amount.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted
tax rates expected to apply in the year in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. When
applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in
tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date.
The Company accounts for income taxes as required by the income
taxes topic of the FASB Accounting Standards. The topic
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It also
provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition.
|
|
(k)
|
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
|
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to future undiscounted (and without interest) net
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets
are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized
is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
(l)
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other
Borrowings
|
The Company enters into sales of securities under agreements to
repurchase (Repurchase Agreements) and collateral pledge
agreements (Pledge Agreements) with selected dealers and banks.
Such agreements are accounted for as secured financing
transactions since the Company maintains effective control over
the transferred or pledged securities and the transfer meets the
other accounting and recognition criteria as required by the
transfer and servicing topic of the FASB Accounting Standards.
Obligations under these agreements are reflected as a liability
in the consolidated balance sheets. Securities underlying the
agreements are maintained at selected dealers and banks as
collateral for each transaction executed and may be sold or
pledged by the counterparty. Collateral underlying Repurchase
Agreements which permit the counterparty to sell or pledge the
underlying collateral is disclosed on the consolidated balance
sheets as encumbered. The
78
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Company retains the right under all Repurchase Agreements and
Pledge Agreements to substitute acceptable collateral throughout
the terms of the agreement.
Comprehensive income includes net income and the change in
unrealized holding gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale,
change in actuarial gains and losses on other post retirement
benefits, and change in service cost on other postretirement
benefits, net of taxes. Comprehensive income is presented in the
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity.
The Company sponsors a defined postretirement benefit plan that
provides for medical and life insurance coverage to a limited
number of retirees, as well as life insurance to all qualifying
employees of the Company. The estimated cost of postretirement
benefits earned is accrued during an individuals estimated
service period to the Company. The Company recognizes in its
statement of financial position the over-funded or under-funded
status of a defined benefit postretirement plan measured as the
difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit
obligation at the end of our calendar year. The actuarial gains
and losses and the prior service costs and credits that arise
during the period are recognized as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax.
Funds borrowed by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) from
the Company to purchase the Companys common stock are
being repaid from the Banks contributions over a period of
up to 30 years. The Companys common stock not yet
allocated to participants is recorded as a reduction of
stockholders equity at cost. The Company records
compensation expense related to the ESOP at an amount equal to
the shares allocated by the ESOP multiplied by the average fair
value of our common stock during the reporting period.
The Company recognizes the grant-date fair value of stock based
awards issued to employees as compensation cost in the
consolidated statements of income. The fair value of common
stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock
as reported on the NASDAQ Stock Market on the grant date. The
expense related to stock options is based on the estimated fair
value of the options at the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes pricing model. The awards are fixed in nature and
compensation cost related to stock based awards is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.
The Bank has a 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees.
Contributions to the plan are expensed as incurred.
As a community-focused financial institution, substantially all
of the Companys operations involve the delivery of loan
and deposit products to customers. Management makes operating
decisions and assesses performance based on an ongoing review of
these community banking operations, which constitute the
Companys only operating segment for financial reporting
purposes.
|
|
(p)
|
Net
Income (Loss) per Common Share
|
Net income per common share-basic is computed for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, by dividing the net income
available to common stockholders by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding, excluding unallocated ESOP shares
and unearned common stock award shares. The weighted average
common shares outstanding includes the average number of shares
of common stock outstanding, including shares held by Northfield
Bancorp, MHC and allocated or committed to be released ESOP
shares.
79
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Net loss per common share is computed for the period the common
stock was outstanding in 2007 (November 8, 2007, to
December 31, 2007) by dividing the net loss available
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding for the period from November 8, 2007, to
December 31, 2007, excluding unallocated ESOP shares. The
weighted average common shares outstanding includes the average
number of shares of common stock outstanding, including shares
held by Northfield Bancorp Inc, MHC and allocated or committed
to be released ESOP shares.
Net income per common share-diluted is computed using the same
method as basic earnings per share, but reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if stock options and unvested shares
of restricted stock were exercised and converted into common
stock. These potentially dilutive shares are included in the
weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period
using the treasury stock method. When applying the treasury
stock method, we add: (1) the assumed proceeds from option
exercises; (2) the tax benefit, if any, that would have
been credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of
non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of restricted
stock; and (3) the average unamortized compensation costs
related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock
options. We then divide this sum by our average stock price for
the period to calculate assumed shares repurchased. The excess
of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares
assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average
common shares to calculate diluted earnings per share. At
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, there were 126,794, 0,
and 0 dilutive shares outstanding, respectively.
|
|
(q)
|
Other
Real Estate Owned
|
Assets acquired through, or
deed-in-lieu
of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially
recorded at estimated fair value less estimated selling costs
when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Costs after
acquisition are generally expensed. If the estimated fair value
of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through other
non-interest expense.
The Company completed its initial public stock offering on
November 7, 2007. The Company sold 19,265,316 shares,
or 43.0% of its outstanding common stock, to subscribers in the
offering, including 1,756,279 shares purchased by the
Northfield Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Northfield
Bancorp, MHC, the Companys federally chartered mutual
holding company parent originally held 24,641,684 shares,
or 55.0% of the Companys outstanding common stock.
Additionally, the Company contributed $3.0 million in cash,
and issued 896,061 shares of common stock, or 2.0% of the
Companys outstanding common stock to the Northfield Bank
Charitable Foundation. The Northfield Bank Charitable Foundation
purchased the common stock at par value. This action resulted in
a $12.0 million pre-tax expense recorded in the quarter
ended December 31, 2007. Proceeds from the offering,
including the value of shares issued to the charitable
foundation, net of expenses, were $198.6 million. The
Company contributed $94.8 million of the proceeds to
Northfield Bank.
80
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(2)
|
Securities
Available-for-Sale
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed
securities and other securities available-for- sale at December
31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored enterprises (GSE)
|
|
$
|
404,128
|
|
|
|
13,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,060
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
65,363
|
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
62,466
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
344,150
|
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
349,088
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
111,756
|
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
114,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
925,397
|
|
|
|
22,726
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
|
|
943,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments mutual funds
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
28,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
134,595
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,409
|
|
|
|
2,647
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
187,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
1,110,806
|
|
|
|
25,373
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government sponsored enterprises (GSE)
|
|
$
|
532,870
|
|
|
|
13,457
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
546,244
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
65,040
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
9,621
|
|
|
|
55,778
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
242,557
|
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
245,492
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
90,446
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
|
83,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930,913
|
|
|
|
17,380
|
|
|
|
17,084
|
|
|
|
931,209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments mutual funds
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
17,319
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,344
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
26,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
957,257
|
|
|
|
17,482
|
|
|
|
17,154
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following is a summary of the expected maturity distribution
of debt securities
available-for-sale
other than mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2009
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
12,294
|
|
|
|
12,478
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
151,295
|
|
|
|
153,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
163,589
|
|
|
|
166,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities on mortgage-backed securities will differ
from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to
call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
Certain securities
available-for-sale
are pledged to secure borrowings under Pledge Agreements and
Repurchase Agreements and for other purposes required by law. At
December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, securities
available-for-sale
with a carrying value of $6,537,000 and $3,772,000,
respectively, were pledged to secure deposits. See note 7
for further discussion regarding securities pledged for
borrowings.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had gross
proceeds of $3,293,000 on sales of securities
available-for-sale
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $89,000 and $0, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company had gross proceeds of
$3,350,000 on sales of securities
available-for-sale
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $15,000 and $0, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, the Company had gross proceeds of
$3,705,000 on sales of securities
available-for-sale
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $9,000 and $0, respectively.
As a result of the Companys adoption of new authoritative
guidance related to Investments Debt and Equity
Securities on April 1, 2009, the Company recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $1.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2009 related to one private label
mortgage-backed security. The company recognized the credit
component of $176,000 in earnings and the non-credit component
of $1.2 million as a part of accumulated other
comprehensive income, net of tax. The Company did not record
other-than-temporary
impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007.
Activity related to the credit component recognized in earnings
on debt securities for which a portion of
other-than-temporary
impairment was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive
income for the year ended December 31, 2009, is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
Additions to the credit component on debt securities in which
other-than-temporary
impairment was not previously recognized
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities, equity
securities, and corporate bonds
available-for-sale,
and the estimated fair value of the related securities,
aggregated by security category and length
82
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
27,832
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
29,294
|
|
REMICs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
116,478
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
16,507
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
132,985
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
6,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
6,970
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4,019
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
|
144,946
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
|
|
44,339
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
189,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
7,290
|
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
17,525
|
|
|
|
9,621
|
|
|
|
24,815
|
|
REMICs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
29,267
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
18,981
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
48,248
|
|
Non-GSE
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
|
68,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,266
|
|
|
|
68,966
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,088
|
|
|
|
110,455
|
|
|
|
7,066
|
|
|
|
37,852
|
|
|
|
17,154
|
|
|
|
148,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the above
available-for-sale
security amounts at December 31, 2009, were eight non-GSE
mortgage-backed securities in an unrealized loss position. Only
three of these securities with an estimated fair value of
$16.6 million are rated less than AAA at December 31,
2009. The first of these three securities had an estimated fair
value of $5.2 million (unrealized loss of $911,000) and was
rated CCC, the second had an estimated fair value of
$5.9 million (unrealized loss of $1.7 million) and was
rated Baa2, with the third having an estimated fair value of
$5.5 million (unrealized loss of $845,000) and was rated AA
(downgraded to a rating of A subsequent to December 31,
2009). The Company continues to receive principal and interest
payments in accordance with the contractual terms on each of the
three securities. Management has evaluated, among other things,
delinquency status, estimated prepayment speeds and the
estimated default rates and loss severity in liquidating the
underlying collateral for each of these three securities. As a
result of managements evaluation of these securities, the
Company recognized, during the quarter ended September 30,
2009, an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $1.4 million on the security rated
CCC. The credit component of $176,000 was recognized in earnings
and the non-credit component of $1.2 million was recorded
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax. The Company has no intent to sell, nor is it more likely
than not than the Company will be required to sell, the
securities contained in the table above before the recovery of
their amortized cost basis or, if necessary, maturity.
83
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In evaluating the range of likely cash flows for the impaired
private label security, the Company applied security specific,
as well as market assumptions, based on the credit
characteristics of the security to a cash flow model. Under
certain stress scenarios estimated future losses may arise. For
the security in which the Company recorded
other-than-temporary
impairment, the average portfolio FICO score at origination was
740 and the weighted average loan to value ratio was 70.3%. Cash
flow assumptions incorporated an expected constant default rate
of 6.8% and an ultimate loss on disposition of underlying
collateral of 47.4%. The securitys cash flows were
discounted at the securitys effective interest rate (the
yield expected to be earned at date of purchase). Although
management recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges on this security, the security continues to
receive principal and interest payments in accordance with its
contractual terms.
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs (ten
securities), GSE bonds (one security) and corporate bonds (one
security) are investment grade securities. The declines in value
are deemed to relate to the general interest rate environment
and are considered temporary. The securities cannot be prepaid
in a manner that would result in the Company not receiving
substantially all of its amortized cost. The Company has no
intent to sell, nor is it more likely than not that the Company
will be required to sell, the securities contained in the table
above before the recovery of their amortized cost basis or, if
necessary, maturity.
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in
the future if the underlying performance of the collateral for
the collateralized mortgage obligations or other securities
deteriorates and our credit enhancement levels do not provide
sufficient protections to our contractual principal and
interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary
impairments may occur in the future given the current economic
environment.
|
|
(3)
|
Securities
Held-to-Maturity
|
The following is a comparative summary of mortgage-backed
securities
held-to-maturity
at December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
874
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,273
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
|
8,347
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company had gross
proceeds of $3,371,000 on sales of securities
held-to-maturity
with gross realized gains and gross realized losses of
approximately $210,000 and $0, respectively, which primarily
resulted from the sale of smaller balance (less than 15% of
original purchased principal) mortgage-backed securities. The
Company sells these smaller balance securities as the cost of
servicing becomes prohibitive. The Company did not sell any
held-to-maturity
securities during the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007.
Gross unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities
held-to-maturity
and the estimated fair value of the related securities,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, at December 31, 2008, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
REMICs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities issued or guaranteed by GSEs are
investment grade securities with no apparent credit weaknesses.
The declines in value are deemed to relate to the general
interest rate environment and are considered temporary. The
securities cannot be prepaid in a manner that would result in
the Company not receiving substantially all of its amortized
cost. Management has the intent and the Company has the ability
to hold these securities until there is a market price recovery.
The fair values of our investment securities could decline in
the future if the underlying performance of the collateral for
the collateralized mortgage obligation or other securities
deteriorates and our credit enhancement levels do not provide
sufficient protections to our contractual principal and
interest. As a result, there is a risk that significant
other-than-temporary
impairments may occur in the future given the current economic
environment.
85
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Loans
held-for-investment,
net, consists of the following at December 31, 2009 and
2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
327,802
|
|
|
|
289,123
|
|
One -to- four family residential
|
|
|
90,898
|
|
|
|
103,128
|
|
Construction and land
|
|
|
44,548
|
|
|
|
52,158
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
178,401
|
|
|
|
108,534
|
|
Home equity and lines of credit
|
|
|
26,118
|
|
|
|
24,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
667,767
|
|
|
|
577,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans
|
|
|
19,252
|
|
|
|
11,025
|
|
Insurance premium finance loans
|
|
|
40,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
728,700
|
|
|
|
589,489
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
569
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
held-for-investment,
net
|
|
|
729,269
|
|
|
|
589,984
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(15,414
|
)
|
|
|
(8,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
$
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not have any loans-held-for-sale at
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
The Company does not have any lending programs commonly referred
to as subprime lending. Subprime lending generally targets
borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized
by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments,
bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity
as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios.
The Company, through its principal subsidiary, the Bank, also
services first mortgage residential loans for others. The
principal balance of residential loans serviced amounted to
$73,800,000 and $77,291,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. In addition, the Company serviced $0 and $250,000
in construction loans at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Servicing of loans for others does not have a
significant effect on our financial position or results of
operations.
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
5,030
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(2,402
|
)
|
|
|
(1,940
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
15,414
|
|
|
|
8,778
|
|
|
|
5,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in loans receivable are loans for which the accrual of
interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in
the financial condition of the borrowers. The principal amount
of these nonaccrual loans
86
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(including impaired loans) was $41,631,000 and $9,502,000 at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Loans past due
ninety days or more and still accruing interest were $191,000
and $137,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
and consisted of loans that are in the process of renewal. The
Company is under commitment to lend additional funds totaling
$360,000 to one borrower whose loan is on non-accrual status at
December 31, 2009.
The following tables summarize impaired loans (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans
|
|
$
|
26,113
|
|
|
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
|
24,517
|
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements
|
|
|
10,717
|
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
10,308
|
|
Accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements
|
|
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
(395
|
)
|
|
|
6,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
44,080
|
|
|
|
(2,400
|
)
|
|
|
41,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
for Loan
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans
|
|
$
|
5,679
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
5,494
|
|
Non-accruing loans subject to restructuring agreements
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
6,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to loans written down by specific reserves recorded
during December 31, 2009, $7.9 million of the
$44.1 million of impaired loans at December 31, 2009
were written down during the year to their recorded investment
by charge-offs amounting to $735,000. Included in the table
above at December 31, 2009, are loans with carrying
balances of $12.7 million that were not written down by
either charge-offs or specific reserves in our allowances for
loan losses.
In addition to the specific reserves recorded during 2008,
$2.7 million of the $6.6 million of impaired loans at
December 31, 2008 were written down during the year by
charge-offs amounting to $761,000. Included in the table above
at December 31, 2008, are loans with carrying balances of
$1.1 million that were not written down by either
charge-offs or specific reserves in our allowances for loan
losses.
At December 31, 2009, there was a commitment to lend
$360,000 in additional funds to one borrower with an outstanding
non-accrual construction loan subject to restructuring. At
December 31, 2008, there were no commitments to lend
additional funds to these borrowers. The average recorded
balance of impaired loans for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007 was approximately $27,152,000, $6,997,000,
and $8,139,000, respectively. The Company recorded $624,000 of
interest income on impaired loans for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The Company did not record any interest
income on impaired loans for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007.
87
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(5)
|
Premises
and Equipment, Net
|
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, premises and equipment, less
accumulated depreciation and amortization, consists of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
At cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
12,782
|
|
|
|
11,755
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
10,570
|
|
|
|
6,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,925
|
|
|
|
24,469
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(17,249
|
)
|
|
|
(15,570
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
12,676
|
|
|
|
8,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007 was $1,679,000, $1,490,000, and $1,326,000,
respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a gain of approximately $648,000 as a result of the
sale of premises and equipment.
Deposits account balances at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Average Rate
|
|
|
Transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negotiable orders of withdrawal
|
|
$
|
62,904
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,382
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
Non-interest bearing checking
|
|
|
110,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total transaction
|
|
|
172,919
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
157,552
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
195,055
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
88,241
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
369,538
|
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
361,061
|
|
|
|
1.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total savings
|
|
|
564,593
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
449,302
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000
|
|
|
302,869
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
252,426
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
|
$100,000 or more
|
|
|
276,504
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
165,159
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificates of deposit
|
|
|
579,373
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
417,585
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
1,316,885
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit at
December 31, 2009, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
517,986
|
|
2011
|
|
|
24,741
|
|
2012
|
|
|
8,363
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
2014 and after
|
|
|
25,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
579,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 is summarized as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Negotiable orders of withdrawal and money market
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
3,147
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
Savings-passbook, statement, and tiered
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
Subscription proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
|
12,168
|
|
|
|
12,656
|
|
|
|
20,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
18,522
|
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other
Borrowings
|
Borrowings consisted of Securities Sold under Agreements to
Repurchase, FHLB advances, and obligations under capital leases
and are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
71,300
|
|
|
|
159,800
|
|
Over-night borrowings
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
279,424
|
|
|
|
332,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances are secured by a blanket lien on unencumbered
securities and the Companys investment in FHLB capital
stock.
89
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Repurchase agreements and FHLB advances have contractual
maturities at December 31, 2009, as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
|
FHLB
|
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
2011
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
2012
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
2013
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
2014 and after
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
71,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Banks repurchase agreements all mature over
90 days and have a weighted average rate of 3.76%. The
repurchase agreements are secured primarily by mortgage-backed
securities with an amortized cost of $212.5 million, and a
market value of $219.4 million, at December 31, 2009.
The Bank has an overnight line of credit with the Federal Home
Loan Bank of New York for $100,000,000. Additionally, the Bank
has a term line of credit for $100,000,000 from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of New York which permits the Bank to borrow for one
month. These lines are limited to the amount of securities
available to be pledged. The Bank had $6.0 million of
outstanding balances under these lines at December 31,
2009. These lines expire on July 31, 2010, and may be
renewed at the option of the FHLB. Additionally, the Company has
the ability to borrow at the Federal Reserve Bank discount
window to the extent the Bank has acceptable collateral to
pledge.
Interest expense on borrowings for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 are summarized as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
$
|
7,158
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
|
|
6,655
|
|
|
|
3,464
|
|
Over-night borrowings
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,763
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
|
|
5,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 consists of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
9,434
|
|
|
|
6,130
|
|
|
|
8,964
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(3,758
|
)
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
(2,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,676
|
|
|
|
6,585
|
|
|
|
6,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(1,180
|
)
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
(7,489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
(7,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recognized income tax expense related to changes
in unrealized gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale
of $8,473,000, $2,428,000, and $7,065,000, in 2009, 2008, and
2007, respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of
comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of changes
in stockholders equity.
The Company has also recognized an income tax expense (benefit)
related to net actuarial losses from other postretirement
benefits of $26,000, $28,000, and $(158,000) in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Such amounts are recorded as a component of
accumulated comprehensive income in the consolidated statements
of changes in stockholders equity.
Reconciliation between the amount of reported total income tax
expense and the amount computed by multiplying the applicable
statutory income tax rate for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense at statutory rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
6,542
|
|
|
|
8,054
|
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State tax, net of federal income tax
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(4,947
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in state apportionment, net of federal tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization of State of New York net operating loss
carryforwards, net of federal tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inome tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
6,618
|
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
(1,555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008, are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
6,346
|
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
Charitable deduction carryforward
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Equity awards
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized actuarial losses on post retirement benefits
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Straight-line leases adjustment
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
Asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Reserve for accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,047
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
Reserve for loan commitments
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Other
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
16,445
|
|
|
|
11,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities AFS
|
|
|
8,558
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired loans
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
Step up to fair market value of acquired investment
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Other
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
9,260
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
9,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has determined that a valuation allowance should be
established for certain state and local tax benefits related to
the Companys contribution to the Northfield Bank
Foundation. The Company has determined that it is not required
to establish a valuation reserve for the remaining net deferred
tax asset account since it is more likely than not
that the net deferred tax assets will be realized through future
reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future
taxable income and tax planning strategies. The conclusion that
it is more likely than not that the remaining net
deferred tax assets will be realized is based on the history of
earnings and the prospects for continued profitability.
Management will continue to review the tax criteria related to
the recognition of deferred tax assets.
Certain amendments to the Federal, New York State, and New York
City tax laws regarding bad debt deductions were enacted in July
1996, August 1996, and March 1997, respectively. The Federal
amendments include elimination of the
percentage-of-taxable-income
method for tax years beginning after December 31, 1995, and
imposition of a requirement to recapture into taxable income
(over a six-year period) the bad debt
92
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
reserves in excess of the base-year amounts. The New York State
and City amendments redesignated the Companys state and
city bad debt reserves at December 31, 1995, as the
base-year amount and also provided for future additions to the
base-year reserve using the
percentage-of-taxable-income
method.
The Companys Federal, state, and city base-year reserves
were approximately $5,900,000, respectively, at
December 31, 2009 and 2008. Under the tax laws as amended,
events that would result in taxation of certain of these
reserves include the following: (a) the Companys
retained earnings represented by this reserve are used for
purposes other than to absorb losses from bad debts, including
excess dividends or distributions in liquidation; (b) the
Company redeems its stock; (c) the Company fails to meet
the definition of a bank for Federal purposes or a thrift for
state and city purposes; or (d) there is a change in the
federal, state, or city tax laws. At December 31, 2005, the
Companys unrecognized deferred tax liabilities with
respect to its base-year reserves for Federal, state, and city
taxes totaled approximately $2,800,000. Deferred tax liabilities
have not been recognized with respect to the 1987 base-year
reserves, since the Company does not expect that these amounts
will become taxable in the foreseeable future.
At December 31, 2005, the Company did not meet the
definition of athrift for New York State and City purposes, and
as a result, recorded a state and local tax expense of
approximately $2,200,000 pertaining to the recapture of the
state and city base-year reserves accumulated after
December 31, 1987.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States
federal jurisdiction and in New York State and City
jurisdictions. The Companys subsidiary also files income
tax returns in the State of New Jersey. With few exceptions, the
Company is no longer subject to federal and local income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2005. The
State of New York has concluded examining the Companys tax
returns filed from 2000 to 2006, resulting in the Company
reversing of state and local tax liabilities of approximately
$4.5 million, net of federal taxes during 2007.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending
amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007. The amounts have not been
reduced by the federal deferred tax effects of unrecognized
state benefits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
Additions of positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company records interest accrued related to uncertain tax
benefits as tax expense. During the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company accrued $62,000 and
$350,000, respectively, in interest on uncertain tax positions.
The Company records penalties accrued as other expenses. The
Company has not incurred any tax penalties.
The Company has a 401(k) plan for its employees, which grants
eligible employees (those salaried employees with at least one
year of service) the opportunity to invest from 2% to 15% of
their base compensation in certain investment alternatives. The
Company contributes an amount equal to 25% of employee
contributions on the first 6% of base compensation contributed
by eligible employees for the first three years of
participation. Subsequent years of participation in excess of
three years will increase the Company matching contribution from
25% to 50% of an employees contributions, on the first 6%
of base compensation contributed by eligible employees. A member
becomes fully vested in the Companys contributions upon
(a) completion of five years of service, or (b) normal
retirement, early retirement, permanent disability, or death.
93
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
During 2007, the Company modified the employer match for the
401(k) plan. Prior to July 9, 2007, the Company contributed
an amount equal to one-half of the employee contribution on the
first 6% of base compensation contributed by eligible employees
for the first three years of participation. Subsequent years of
participation in excess of three years increased the Company
matching contribution from 50% to 100% of an employees
contributions, on the first 6% of base compensation contributed
by eligible employees. The Companys contribution to this
plan amounted to approximately $156,000, $166,000, and $270,000
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.
The Company also maintains a profit-sharing plan in which the
Company can contribute to the participants 401(k) account,
at its discretion, up to the legal limit of the Internal Revenue
Code. The Company did not contribute to the profit sharing plan
during 2009, 2008 and 2007.
The Company maintains the Northfield Bank Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (the ESOP). The ESOP is a tax-qualified plan
designed to invest primarily in the Companys common stock.
The ESOP provides employees with the opportunity to receive a
funded retirement benefit from the Bank, based primarily on the
value of the Companys common stock. The ESOP was
authorized to, and did purchase, 1,756,279 shares of the
Companys common stock in the Companys initial public
offering at a price of $10.00 per share. This purchase was
funded with a loan from Northfield Bancorp, Inc. to the ESOP.
The first payment on the loan from the ESOP to the Company was
due and paid on December 31, 2007, and the outstanding
balance at December 31, 2009 and 2008, was
$15.8 million and $16.2 million, respectively. The
shares of the Companys common stock purchased in the
initial public offering are pledged as collateral for the loan.
Shares will be released for allocation to participants as loan
payments are made. A total of 58,539 and 58,643 shares were
released and allocated to participants for the ESOP year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. ESOP compensation
expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$676,000 and $644,000, respectively. Cash dividends on
unallocated shares are utilized to satisfy required debt
payments. Dividends on allocated shares are utilized to prepay
debt which releases additional shares to participants.
The Company maintains a Supplemental Employee Stock Ownership
Plan (the SESOP) a non-qualified plan that provides supplemental
benefits to certain executives who are prevented from receiving
the full benefits contemplated by the ESOPs benefit
formula under tax law limits for tax-qualified plans. The
supplemental payments for the SESOP consist of cash payments
representing the value of Company shares that cannot be
allocated to participants under the ESOP due to legal
limitations imposed on tax-qualified plans. The Company made a
contribution to the SESOP plan of $41,000 and $54,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
94
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following tables set forth the funded status and components
of postretirement benefit costs at December 31 measurement dates
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation end of year
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability (included in accrued expenses and other
liabilities)
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amounts recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Transition obligation
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss, transition obligation, and prior service
cost that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into net periodic cost in 2010 are $17,000,
$17,000 and $16,000, respectively.
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic
postretirement benefit costs for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Amortization of transition obligation
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit cost included in compensation and
employee benefits
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumed discount rate related to plan obligations reflects
the weighted average of published market rates for high-quality
corporate bonds with terms similar to those of the plans
expected benefit payments,
95
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
rounded to the nearest quarter percentage point. The
Companys discount rate and rate of compensation increase
used in accounting for the plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at period end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost for the
year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
Rate of increase in compensation
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
At December 31, 2009, a medical cost trend rate of 9.0% for
2009, decreasing 0.50% per year thereafter until an ultimate
rate of 5.0% is reached, was used in the plans valuation.
The Companys healthcare cost trend rate is based, among
other things, on the Companys own experience and third
party analysis of recent and projected healthcare cost trends.
At December 31, 2008, a medical cost trend rate of 12.00%
for 2008, decreasing 1.00% per year thereafter until an ultimate
rate of 5.0% is reached, was used in the plans valuation.
The Companys healthcare cost trend rate is based, among
other things, on the Companys own experience and third
party analysis of recent and projected healthcare cost trends.
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends
would have the following effects (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Effect on benefits earned and interest cost
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A one percentage-point change in assumed heath care cost trends
would have the following effects (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
One Percentage
|
|
|
|
Point Increase
|
|
|
Point Decrease
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Aggregate of service and interest components of net periodic
cost (benefit)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit payments of approximately $97,000, $88,000, and $83,000
were made in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively. The benefits
expected to be paid under the postretirement health benefits
plan for the next five years are as follows: $130,000 in 2010;
$133,000 in 2011; $136,000 in 2012; $139,000 in 2013; and
$141,000 in 2014. The benefit payments expected to be paid in
the aggregate for the years 2015 through 2019 are $689,000. The
expected benefits are based on the same assumptions used to
measure the Companys benefit obligation at
December 31, 2009, and include estimated future employee
service.
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act of 2003, or Medicare Act, introduced both a Medicare
prescription-drug benefit and a federal subsidy to sponsors of
retiree health-care plans that provide a benefit at least
actuarially equivalent to the Medicare benefit. The
Company has evaluated the estimated potential subsidy available
under the Medicare Act and the related costs associated with
qualifying for the subsidy. Due to the limited number of
participants in the plan, the Company has concluded that it is
not cost beneficial to apply for the subsidy. Therefore, the
accumulated postretirement
96
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
benefit obligation information and related net periodic
postretirement benefit costs do not reflect the effect of any
potential subsidy.
The Company maintains a nonqualified plan to provide for the
elective deferral of all or a portion of director fees by
members of the participating board of directors, deferral of all
or a portion of the compensation
and/or
annual bonus payable to eligible employees of the Company, and
to provide to certain officers of the Company benefits in excess
of those permitted to be paid by the Companys savings
plan, ESOP, and profit-sharing plan under the applicable
Internal Revenue Code. The plan obligation was approximately
$3,403,000 and $2,498,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and is included in accrued expenses and other
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Expense (income)
under this plan was $592,000, $(1,331,000), and $62,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively. The Company invests to fund this future
obligation, in various mutual funds designated as trading
securities. The securities are
marked-to-market
through current period earnings as a component of non-interest
income. Accrued obligations under this plan are credited or
charged with the return on the trading securities portfolio as a
component of compensation and benefits expense.
The Company entered into a supplemental retirement agreement
with its former president and current director on July 18,
2006. The agreement provides for 120 monthly payments of
$17,450. The present value of the obligation, of approximately
$1,625,000, was recorded in compensation and benefits expense in
2006. The present value of the obligation as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, was approximately $1,190,000
and $1,334,000, respectively.
|
|
(10)
|
Equity
Incentive Plan
|
The Company maintains the Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity
Incentive Plan to grant common stock or options to purchase
common stock at specific prices to directors and employees of
the Company. The Plan provides for the issuance or delivery of
up to 3,073,488 shares of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. common
stock subject to certain Plan limitations. On January 30,
2009, certain officers and employees of the Company were granted
an aggregate of 1,478,900 stock options and 582,700 shares
of restricted stock, and non-employee directors received an
aggregate of 623,700 stock options and 249,750 shares of
restricted stock. On May 29, 2009, an employee was granted
3,800 stock options and 4,200 restricted stock awards. All stock
options and restricted stock vest in equal installments over a
five year period beginning one year from the date of grant. The
vesting of options and restricted stock awards may accelerate in
accordance with terms of the plan. Stock options were granted at
an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Companys
common stock on the grant date based on quoted market prices and
all have an expiration period of ten years. The fair value of
stock options granted on January 30, 2009, was estimated
utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the
following assumptions: an expected life of 6.5 years
utilizing the simplified method, risk-free rate of return of
2.17%, volatility of 35.33% and a dividend yield of 1.61%. The
fair value of stock options granted on May 29, 2009, was
estimated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model using
the following assumptions: an expected life of 6.5 years
utilizing the simplified method, risk-free rate of return of
2.88%, volatility of 38.39% and a dividend yield of 1.50%. The
Company is expensing the grant date fair value of all employee
and director share-based compensation over the requisite service
periods on a straight-line basis.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
recorded $2.9 million of stock-based compensation. There
was no stock based compensation during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
97
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table is a summary of the Companys
non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2009, and
changes therein during the year then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,106,400
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(23,000
|
)
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding- December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,083,400
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
9.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable- December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock option expense related to the non-vested
options outstanding as of December 31, 2009, is
$5.5 million over an average period of 4.0 years.
The following is a summary of the status of the Companys
restricted shares as of December 31, 2009, and changes
therein during the year then ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Awarded
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
836,650
|
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(11,500
|
)
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
825,150
|
|
|
$
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected future stock award expense related to the non-vested
restricted awards as of December 31, 2009 is
$6.7 million over an average period of 4.0 years.
Upon the exercise of stock options, management expects to
utilize treasury stock as the source of issuance for these
shares.
|
|
(11)
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to
commitments that involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk
in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated
financial statements. These commitments include unused lines of
credit and commitments to extend credit.
At December 31, 2009, the following commitment and
contingent liabilities existed that are not reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
4,264
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
|
36,027
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
3,181
|
|
The Companys maximum exposure to credit losses in the
event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments
is represented by the contractual amount. The Company uses the
same credit policies in granting commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for amounts recorded in the consolidated
balance sheets. These commitments and obligations do not
necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. The Company
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral
98
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on managements
assessment of risk. Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance
of a customer to a third party. The guarantees generally extend
for a term of up to one year and are fully collateralized. For
each guarantee issued, if the customer defaults on a payment to
the third party, the Company would have to perform under the
guarantee. The unamortized fee on standby letters of credit
approximates their fair value; such fees were insignificant at
December 31, 2009. The Company maintains an allowance for
estimated losses on commitments to extend credit. At
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the allowance was $266,000 and
$390,000, respectively, and is recorded as a component of other
non-interest expense.
At December 31, 2009, the Company was obligated under
non-cancelable operating leases and capitalized leases on
property used for banking purposes. Most leases contain
escalation clauses and renewal options which provide for
increased rentals as well as for increases in certain property
costs including real estate taxes, common area maintenance, and
insurance.
The projected minimum annual rental payments and receipts under
the capitalized leases and operating leases are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Receipts
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
365
|
|
|
|
2,177
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2011
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
2,083
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2012
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
2013
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
2014
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
22,686
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
32,999
|
|
|
|
2,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net rental expense included in occupancy expense was
approximately $2,128,000, $1,466,000, and $1,140,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
In December of 2009, the Bank entered in an agreement to lease a
building located in Brooklyn, New York. The Bank intends to
operate a bank branch at this location. The Bank anticipates
taking possession of the building during 2010 at which time the
lease will commence. The initial lease is term is 15 years
with an average monthly rental expense of $22,000 per month. The
Bank has two five year renewal options.
In December of 2009, the Bank entered in an agreement to lease a
building located on in Staten Island, New York. The Bank intends
to operate a bank branch at this location. The Bank anticipates
taking possession of the building during 2010 at which time the
lease will commence. The lease is for a term of 15 years
with an average monthly rental expense of $15,000 per month. The
Bank has two five year renewal options.
In the normal course of business, the Company may be a party to
various outstanding legal proceedings and claims. In the opinion
of management, the consolidated financial statements will not be
materially affected by the outcome of such legal proceedings and
claims.
The Bank is required by regulation to maintain a certain level
of cash balances on hand
and/or on
deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Bank was required to
maintain balances of $483,000 and $3,762,000, respectively.
The Bank has entered into employment agreements with its Chief
Executive Officer and the other executive officers of the Bank
to ensure the continuity of executive leadership, to clarify the
roles and
99
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
responsibilities of executives, and to make explicit the terms
and conditions of executive employment. These agreements are for
a term of three-years subject to review and annual renewal, and
provide for certain levels of base annual salary and in the
event of a change in control, as defined, or in the event of
termination, as defined, certain levels of base salary, bonus
payments, and benefits for a period of up to three-years.
On May 26, 2006, the Bank entered into a purchase and
assumption agreement with a third party which includes the
purchase of certain premises, equipment, and leaseholds of two
of the Banks branches. The agreement also provides for the
third party to assume the deposit liabilities of the two
branches, totaling approximately $29.0 million as of
December 31, 2006, and related lease obligations. The
purchase and assumption agreement is at or above the Banks
carrying value of the related assets purchased and liabilities
and obligations being assumed. The transaction closed in the
first quarter of 2007 and the Company recognized a gain on the
sale of premises and equipment and related deposit relationships
of approximately $4.3 million.
|
|
(12)
|
Regulatory
Requirements
|
Northfield Bank converted to a federally-charted savings bank
from a New York-chartered savings bank effective
November 6, 2007. Northfield Banks regulator is the
Office of Thrift Supervision OTS (previously Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC). Simultaneously
with Northfield Banks conversion, Northfield Bancorp, MHC
and Northfield Bancorp, Inc. converted to federal-charters from
New York-chartered holding companies.
The OTS requires banks to maintain a minimum tangible capital
ratio to tangible assets of 1.5%, a minimum core capital ratio
to total adjusted assets of 4.0%, and a minimum ratio of total
risk-adjusted total assets of 8.0%.
Under prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is required
to take certain supervisory actions (and may take additional
discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized
institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on
the institutions financial statements. The regulations
establish a framework for the classification of savings
institutions into five categories: well capitalized, adequately
capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized,
and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is
considered well capitalized if it has a core capital ratio of at
least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6%,
and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%.
The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific
quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications also
are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about
capital components, risk weighting, and other factors.
Management believes that as of December 31, 2009, the Bank
met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
Further, the most recent OTS notification categorized the Bank
as a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective
action regulations. There have been no conditions or events
since that notification that management believes have changed
the Banks capital classification.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is regulated, supervised, and examined
by the OTS as a savings and loan holding company and, as such,
is not subject to regulatory capital requirements.
The following is a summary of Northfield Banks regulatory
capital amounts and ratios compared to the OTS requirements as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, for classification as a
well-capitalized institution and minimum capital (dollars in
thousands).
100
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTS Requirements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For well
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
As of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to tangible assets
|
|
$
|
274,236
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
28,666
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
%
|
Tier 1 captial (core) (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
274,236
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
76,442
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
95,553
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Total capital (to risk- weighted assets)
|
|
|
287,085
|
|
|
|
28.52
|
|
|
|
80,529
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
100,661
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
As of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible capital to tangible assets
|
|
$
|
272,480
|
|
|
|
15.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,577
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
NA
|
|
|
|
NA
|
%
|
Tier 1 captial (core) (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
272,480
|
|
|
|
15.98
|
|
|
|
68,205
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
85,257
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Total capital (to risk- weighted assets)
|
|
|
281,648
|
|
|
|
34.81
|
|
|
|
64,728
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
80,910
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
The following table presents the assets reported on the
consolidated balance sheet at their estimated fair value as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, by level within the Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification. Financial assets and liabilities are
classified in their entirety based on the level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value
hierarchy is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement
date.
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices
included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets,
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability (for example,
interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss
severities, credit risks and default rates) or inputs that are
derived principally from or corroborated by observable market
data by correlations or other means.
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs Significant unobservable inputs
that reflect the Companys own assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.
|
101
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following tables summarize financial assets and financial
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, segregated by the level of the
valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to
measure fair value (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
943,808
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
943,808
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
GSE bonds
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
21,872
|
|
|
|
1,109,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,135,206
|
|
|
$
|
25,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,109,931
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
931,209
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
931,209
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
948,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
960,083
|
|
|
$
|
11,523
|
|
|
$
|
948,560
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available -for- Sale Securities: The estimated
fair values for mortgage-backed securities, GSE bonds, and
corporate securities are obtained from a nationally recognized
third-party pricing service. The estimated fair values are
derived primarily from cash flow models, which include
assumptions for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayment
speeds. Broker/dealer quotes are utilized as well when such
quotes are available and deemed representative of the market.
The significant inputs utilized in the cash flow models are
based on market data obtained from sources independent of the
Company (observable inputs,) and are therefore classified as
Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair
value of equity securities classified as Level 1, are
derived from quoted market prices in active markets. Equity
securities consist primarily of money market mutual funds.
Trading Securities: Fair values are derived
from quoted market prices in active markets. The assets consist
of publicly traded mutual funds.
102
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Also, the Company may be required, from time to time, to measure
the fair value of certain other financial assets on a
nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value
usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market
accounting or write downs of individual assets.
Impaired Loans: At December 31, 2009 and
2008, the Company had impaired loans with outstanding principal
balances of $31.4 million and $5.5 million that were
recorded at their estimated fair value of $29.0 million and
$5.2 million, respectively. The Company recorded impairment
charges of $2.4 million and $300,000, for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, utilizing
Level 3 inputs. In addition, the Company recorded
charge-offs on impaired loans amounting to $940,000 and
$761,000, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, also utilizing Level 3 inputs. Impaired
assets are valued utilizing independent appraisals, if the loan
is collateral dependent, adjusted downward by management, as
necessary, for changes in relevant valuation factors subsequent
to the appraisal date or the present value of expected future
cash flows for non-collateral dependent loans and troubled debt
restructurings.
Other Real Estate Owned: At December 31,
2009 and 2008, the Company had assets acquired through or
deed-in-lieu
of foreclosure of $1.9 million and $1.1 million,
respectively, recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated
selling costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis.
Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These
appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the
appraisers market knowledge and experience, and are
considered level 3 inputs. When an asset is acquired, the
excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated
selling costs, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If
the estimated fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is
recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is
subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because
of changes in the economic conditions.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
transferred a loan with a principal balance of $1.9 million
and an estimated fair value, less costs to sell, of
$1.4 million to other real estate owned. During the year
ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded impairment
charges of $489,000 prior to the transfer of the loan to OREO
utilizing Level 3 inputs. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company transferred a loan with a
principal balance of $2.1 million and an estimated fair
value, less costs to sell, of $1.1 million to other real
estate owned. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Company recorded impairment charges of $1.0 million prior
to the transfer of the loan to OREO utilizing Level 3
inputs. Subsequent valuation adjustments to other real estate
owned totaled $516,000 and $0 for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, reflective of
continued deterioration in estimated fair values. Operating
costs after acquisition are generally expensed.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The FASB Accounting Standards Topic for Financial Instruments
requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and
financial liabilities, including those financial assets and
financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair
value on a recurring or non-recurring basis. The methodologies
for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or
non-recurring basis are discussed above. The following methods
and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other
financial assets and financial liabilities not already discussed
above:
|
|
(a)
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents, and Certificates of Deposit
|
Cash and cash equivalents are short-term in nature with original
maturities of three months or less; the carrying amount
approximates fair value. Certificates of deposits having
original terms of six-months or less; carrying value generally
approximates fair value. Certificate of deposits with an
original maturity of six months or greater the fair value is
derived from discounted cash flows.
103
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(b)
|
Securities
(Held to Maturity)
|
The fair values for substantially all of our securities are
obtained from an independent nationally recognized pricing
service. The independent pricing service utilizes market prices
of same or similar securities whenever such prices are
available. Prices involving distressed sellers are not utilized
in determining fair value. Where necessary, the independent
third-party pricing service estimates fair value using models
employing techniques such as discounted cash flow analyses. The
assumptions used in these models typically include assumptions
for interest rates, credit losses, and prepayments, utilizing
market observable data where available.
|
|
(c)
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York Stock
|
The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock is
its carrying value, since this is the amount for which it could
be redeemed and there is no active market for this stock.
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar
financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as
residential mortgage, construction, land, multifamily,
commercial and consumer. Each loan category is further segmented
into amortizing and
non-amortizing
and fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing
and nonperforming categories. The fair value of loans is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current
prepayment assumptions and current rates at which similar loans
would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for
the same remaining maturities. This method of estimating fair
value does not incorporate the exit price concept of fair value
prescribed by the FASB ASC Topic for Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as
non-interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW and money
market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The
fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted
value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated
using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
|
|
(f)
|
Commitments
to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit
|
The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby
letters of credit are estimated using the fees currently charged
to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the
remaining terms of the agreements and the present
creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan
commitments, fair value also considers the difference between
current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The
fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments is insignificant and
therefore not included in the following table.
The fair value of borrowings is estimated by discounting future
cash flows based on rates currently available for debt with
similar terms and remaining maturity.
|
|
(h)
|
Advance
Payments by Borrowers
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance have no
stated maturity; the fair value is equal to the amount currently
payable.
104
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Companys significant
financial instruments at December 31, 2009, and 2008, are
presented in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Value
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
42,544
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
|
|
50,128
|
|
Certificates of deposit in other financial institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,653
|
|
|
|
53,873
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
3,403
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
1,131,803
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
|
|
957,585
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
|
|
6,930
|
|
|
|
14,479
|
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
6,421
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
Net loans
held-for-investment
|
|
|
713,855
|
|
|
|
726,475
|
|
|
|
581,206
|
|
|
|
610,713
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,316,885
|
|
|
|
1,319,612
|
|
|
|
1,024,439
|
|
|
|
1,027,896
|
|
Repurchase Agreements and other borrowings
|
|
|
279,424
|
|
|
|
288,737
|
|
|
|
332,084
|
|
|
|
340,404
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
Limitations
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based
on relevant market information and information about the
financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium
or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time
the Companys entire holdings of a particular financial
instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion
of the Companys financial instruments, fair value
estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of
various financial instruments, and other factors. These
estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and
matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could
significantly affect the estimates.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and
off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to
estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value
of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial
instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the
realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a
significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been
considered in the estimates.
|
|
(14)
|
Stock
Repurchase Program
|
On February 13, 2009, the board of directors of the Company
authorized a stock repurchase program pursuant to which the
Company intends to repurchase up to 2,240,153 shares,
representing approximately 5% of its outstanding shares. The
timing of the repurchases depends on certain factors, including
but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the
Companys liquidity and capital requirements, and
alternative uses of capital. All repurchased shares are expected
to be held as treasury stock and available for general corporate
purposes. The Company is conducting such repurchases in
accordance with a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. As of
December 31, 2009, a total of 1,716,063 shares were
purchased under this repurchase plan at a weighted average cost
of $11.61 per share.
105
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(15)
|
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
|
The following is a summary of the Companys earnings per
share calculations and reconciliation of basic to diluted
earnings per share for the periods indicated (in thousands,
except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic
|
|
|
42,405,774
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
|
|
43,076,586
|
|
Effect of non-vested restricted stock and stock options
outstanding
|
|
|
126,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
42,532,568
|
|
|
|
43,133,856
|
|
|
|
43,076,586
|
|
Earnings per share-basic(1)
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
Earnings per share-diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net loss per share is calculated for the period that the
Companys shares of common stock were outstanding
(November 8, 2007, through December 31, 2007). The net
loss for this period was $1,501,000 and the weighted average
common shares outstanding were 43,076,586. Per share data and
shares outstanding information is not applicable prior to
November 8, 2007. |
|
|
(16)
|
Parent-only
Financial Information
|
The following condensed parent company only financial
information reflects Northfield Bancorp, Inc.s investment
in its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary, Northfield Bank,
using the equity method of accounting.
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in Northfield Bank
|
|
$
|
18,095
|
|
|
|
42,555
|
|
Interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,153
|
|
Investment in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
302,260
|
|
|
|
289,097
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
(corporate bonds)
|
|
|
50,511
|
|
|
|
4,298
|
|
ESOP loan receivable
|
|
|
15,798
|
|
|
|
16,179
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
3,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
391,674
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
391,540
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
391,674
|
|
|
|
386,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest on ESOP loan
|
|
$
|
526
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
Interest income on deposit in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Interest income on certificates of deposit
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Interest income on corporate bonds
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of Northfield Bank
|
|
|
11,521
|
|
|
|
14,103
|
|
|
|
18,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
13,513
|
|
|
|
17,883
|
|
|
|
18,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution to charitable foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
(4,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
7,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Northfield
Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
15,831
|
|
|
|
10,507
|
|
Contribution of stock to charitable foundation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
(3,336
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in due from Northfield Bank
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
(1,287
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in other assets
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
Amortization of premium on corporate bond
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
46
|
|
Undistributed earnings of Northfield Bank
|
|
|
(11,521
|
)
|
|
|
(14,103
|
)
|
|
|
(18,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
(3,944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional investment in Northfield Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,874
|
)
|
Dividend from Northfield Bank
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of corporate bonds
|
|
|
(50,323
|
)
|
|
|
(4,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of corporate bonds
|
|
|
4,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan to ESOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,563
|
)
|
Principal payments on ESOP loan receivable
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
1,205
|
|
Maturities (purchases) of certificate of deposits
|
|
|
30,153
|
|
|
|
(23,653
|
)
|
|
|
(6,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(1,499
|
)
|
|
|
(27,942
|
)
|
|
|
(117,732
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock offering, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,600
|
|
Contribution from Northfield Bancorp, MHC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(19,929
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(22,892
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(22,667
|
)
|
|
|
(25,869
|
)
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
42,555
|
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
19,888
|
|
|
|
42,555
|
|
|
|
68,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
NORTHFIELD
BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly
financial data for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
20,482
|
|
|
|
21,013
|
|
|
|
21,855
|
|
|
|
22,218
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
7,078
|
|
|
|
7,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
13,837
|
|
|
|
14,777
|
|
|
|
15,216
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
3,099
|
|
|
|
2,723
|
|
|
|
1,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
11,117
|
|
|
|
10,738
|
|
|
|
12,054
|
|
|
|
13,644
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
7,782
|
|
|
|
9,061
|
|
|
|
8,429
|
|
|
|
8,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
3,201
|
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
6,205
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share- basis and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
17,315
|
|
|
|
18,097
|
|
|
|
19,034
|
|
|
|
20,603
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6,724
|
|
|
|
6,550
|
|
|
|
6,792
|
|
|
|
8,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
10,591
|
|
|
|
11,547
|
|
|
|
12,242
|
|
|
|
12,413
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
1,276
|
|
|
|
1,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,993
|
|
|
|
10,307
|
|
|
|
10,966
|
|
|
|
10,445
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,399
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
820
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
5,986
|
|
|
|
5,939
|
|
|
|
6,703
|
|
|
|
6,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
7,406
|
|
|
|
5,575
|
|
|
|
5,083
|
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
5,605
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share- basis and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
109
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
John W. Alexander, our Chief Executive Officer, and Steven M.
Klein, our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) the
Exchange Act as of December 31, 2009. Based
upon their evaluation, they each found that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file
and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported as and when required and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2009 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting and we
identified no material weaknesses requiring corrective action
with respect to those controls.
Management
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
in the Exchange Act. The Companys internal control system
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the
Companys management and board of directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies
and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions
and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and the directors of the Company;
and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on our
financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have
inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management assessed the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, we used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment we believe that, as of
December 31, 2009, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm
that audited the consolidated financial statements has issued an
audit report on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,
and it is included in Item 8, under Part II of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
This report appears on page 69 of the document.
110
|
|
ITEM 9A(T).
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
The registrant is an accelerated filer therefore the disclosure
under this item is not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The sections of the Companys definitive proxy statement
for the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders
(the 2010 Proxy Statement) entitled
Proposal I-Election
of Directors, Other Information-Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Corporate
Governance and Board Matters -Codes of Conduct and Ethics,
Stockholder Communications, and Board of
Directors, Leadership Structure, Role in Risk Oversight,
Meetings and Standing Committees-Audit Committee are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The sections of the Companys 2010 Proxy Statement entitled
Corporate Governance and Board
Matters-Director
Compensation, and Executive Compensation are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The sections of the Companys 2010 Proxy Statement entitled
Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof,
Corporate Governance and Board Matters Equity
Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders and
Proposal I-Election
of Directors are incorporated herein by reference.
The Company does not have any equity compensation program that
was not approved by stockholders, other than its employee stock
ownership plan.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The section of the Companys 2010 Proxy Statement entitled
Corporate Governance and Board Matters-Transactions with
Certain Related Persons is incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The sections of the Companys 2010 Proxy Statement entitled
Audit-Related Matters-Policy for Approval of Audit and
Permitted Non-audit Services and Auditor Fees and
Services are incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following documents are filed as part of this
Form 10-K.
(A) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
(B) Consolidated Balance Sheets at
December 31, 2009, and 2008
(C) Consolidated Statements of Income Years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(D) Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders Equity-Years ended December 31, 2009,
2008, and 2007
(E) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
(F) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
111
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
(a)(3) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Charter of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amendments to Bylaws of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Kenneth J. Doherty(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Steven M. Klein(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement with Albert J.
Regen(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Northfield Bank 2010 Management Cash Incentive Compensation
Plan(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Short Term Disability and Long Term Disability for Senior
Management(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Northfield Bank Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Northfield Bank Non Qualified Supplemental Employee Stock
Ownership Plan(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with John W. Alexander(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amended Employment Agreement with Michael J. Widmer(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment to Northfield Bank Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment to Northfield Bank Non Qualified Supplemental Employee
Stock Ownership Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Director Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement
under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Director Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Employee Non-Statutory Stock Option Award Agreement
under the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Form of Employee Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under
the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Form of Employee Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2008
Equity Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. Management Cash Incentive Plan(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1
of Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (File
No. 333-143643),
originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 11, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on Form
8-K, dated
June 24, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 26, 2009 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Annual Report on Form
10-K, dated
December 31, 2007, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 31, 2008 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on Form
8-K, dated
December 23, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 23, 2009 (File Number
001-33732). |
112
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2008
(File Number
001-33732). |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Annual Report on Form
10-K, dated
December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 16, 2009 (File Number
0001-33732). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of Northfield
Bancorp Inc.s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (File
No. 001-33732)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 23, 2009). |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on Form
8-K, dated
January 4, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 5, 2010 (File Number
001-33732). |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Northfield Bancorp Inc.s
Current Report on Form
8-K, dated
March 25, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 25, 2009 (File Number
001-33732) |
113
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
NORTHFIELD BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John
W. Alexander
|
John W. Alexander
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Representative)
Date: March 16, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
W. Alexander
John
W. Alexander
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Steven
M. Klein
Steven
M. Klein
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
R. Bowen
John
R. Bowen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Annette
Catino
Annette
Catino
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gil
Chapman
Gil
Chapman
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
P. Connors, Jr
John
P. Connors, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
J. DePierro
John
J. DePierro
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Susan
Lamberti
Susan
Lamberti
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Albert
J. Regen
Albert
J. Regen
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick
E. Scura, Jr.
Patrick
E. Scura, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2010
|
114