e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
OR
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the
transition period from
to
Commission file number 1-13175
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-1828067 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
One Valero Way
San Antonio, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
78249
(Zip Code)
(210) 345-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller
reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants only class of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding
as of April 30, 2010 was 565,475,748.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars, Except Par Value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments |
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
3,947 |
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Assets held for sale and assets related to discontinued operations |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
11,320 |
|
|
|
11,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
29,186 |
|
|
|
28,463 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(5,851 |
) |
|
|
(5,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
23,335 |
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
36,465 |
|
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,986 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
8,095 |
|
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
7,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,200,000,000 shares authorized;
673,501,593 and 673,501,593 shares issued |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,879 |
|
|
|
7,896 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 108,318,528 and 108,798,847 common shares |
|
|
(6,688 |
) |
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
13,036 |
|
|
|
13,178 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
14,666 |
|
|
|
14,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
36,465 |
|
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Millions of Dollars, Except per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues (1) |
|
$ |
19,643 |
|
|
$ |
13,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
18,136 |
|
|
|
11,204 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
19,675 |
|
|
|
12,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
593 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
364 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions) |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding assuming dilution (in millions) |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
Dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes excise taxes on sales by our U.S. retail system |
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
309 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Noncash interest expense and other income, net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
Changes in current assets and current liabilities |
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
Changes in deferred charges and credits and other operating activities, net |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(735 |
) |
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
Advance payments related to purchase of ethanol facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Purchase of ethanol facilities |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-bank debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable sales program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of receivables |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee benefit plans |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Benefit from tax deduction in excess of recognized stock-based compensation cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain reclassified into income, net of income
tax expense of $- and $- |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments
designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) arising during the period, net of income
tax (expense) benefit of $1 and $(32) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
Net gain reclassified into income, net of income
tax expense of $17 and $21 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(46 |
) |
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION, PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION, AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
As used in this report, the terms Valero, we, us, or our may refer to Valero Energy
Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or all of them taken as a whole.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Valero and subsidiaries
in which Valero has a controlling interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in significant non-controlled entities are accounted for
using the equity method.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for
complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. Financial information for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 included in these Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements is derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. Operating results for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial
statements as of that date. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
We have evaluated subsequent events that occurred after March 31, 2010 through the filing of this
Form 10-Q. Any material subsequent events that occurred during this time have been properly
recognized or disclosed in our financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires our management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis,
management reviews its estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and
circumstances may result in revised estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
As discussed in Note 4, we permanently shut down our Delaware City Refinery in the fourth quarter
of 2009, and our board of directors approved a plan of sale for our terminal, pipeline, and
shutdown refinery assets at Delaware City in the first quarter of 2010. As a result, these assets
have been presented in the consolidated balance sheet as assets held for sale and assets of
discontinued operations as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009. In addition, the results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery
have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for both
periods presented.
7
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asset impairment losses have been presented on a separate line in the 2009
consolidated statement of income. These losses resulted from the cancellation of certain capital projects classified as construction in
progress, and for the three months ended March 31, 2009, such losses have been reclassified from
operating expenses and presented separately. The asset impairment losses are also presented on a
separate line in the consolidated statements of cash flows, which resulted in an adjustment to
changes in deferred charges and credits and other operating activities, net previously reported
for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Asset impairment losses presented in the consolidated
statements of cash flows includes asset impairment losses associated with the Delaware City
Refinery. Such losses, however, are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated
statements of income.
2. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, Topic 860 of the Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification, or ASC),
Transfers and Servicing, was modified to clarify the requirements for derecognizing transferred
financial assets, remove the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and related exceptions,
and require additional disclosures related to transfers of financial assets. This guidance was
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
November 15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The adoption of these provisions of ASC
Topic 860 effective January 1, 2010 did not affect our financial position or results of operations.
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, was amended to modify provisions related to variable
interest entities to include entities previously considered qualifying special-purpose entities, as
the concept of these entities was eliminated. This modification also clarifies consolidation
requirements and expands disclosure requirements related to variable interest entities. These
provisions of ASC Topic 810 were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The
adoption of these provisions of ASC Topic 810 effective January 1, 2010 did not affect our
financial position or results of operations.
3. ACQUISITIONS
The acquired ethanol businesses discussed below involve the production and marketing of ethanol and
its co-products, including distillers grains. The operations of our ethanol business complement our existing clean
motor fuels business.
Acquisitions of ASA and Renew Assets
In December 2009, we signed an agreement with ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC (ASA) to buy two ethanol
plants located in Linden, Indiana and Bloomingburg, Ohio and made a $20 million advance payment
towards the purchase of these facilities. On January 13, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the
facilities, including certain inventories, for a total purchase price of $202 million.
8
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Also in December 2009, we received approval from a bankruptcy court to acquire an ethanol facility
located near Jefferson, Wisconsin from Renew Energy LLC (Renew) and made a $1 million advance
payment towards the purchase of this facility. We completed the acquisition of this facility,
including certain receivables and inventories, on February 4, 2010 for a total purchase price of
$79 million.
The assets acquired from ASA and Renew have been recognized at estimated acquisition-date fair
values as determined by preliminary independent appraisals and other evaluations as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, primarily inventory |
|
$ |
11 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration |
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither goodwill nor a gain from a bargain purchase is expected to be recognized in conjunction
with the ASA and Renew acquisitions, and no contingent assets or liabilities were acquired or
assumed. In addition, pro forma results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010
have not been presented for these acquisitions as the acquisitions were not material to our
financial position or results of operations. The consolidated statement of income for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 includes the results of the ASA and Renew acquisitions as of their
respective acquisition dates in the first quarter of 2010.
Acquisition of VeraSun Assets
In the second quarter of 2009, we acquired seven ethanol plants and a site under development from
VeraSun Energy Corporation (VeraSun). The acquisition of these ethanol plants (referred to as the
VeraSun Acquisition) was completed under three separate closing transactions. The purchase price
for the VeraSun Acquisition was $477 million plus $79 million primarily for inventory and certain
other working capital.
An independent appraisal of the assets acquired in the VeraSun Acquisition was completed, and the
assets acquired and the liabilities assumed have been recognized at their acquisition-date fair
values as determined by the appraisal and other evaluations as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, primarily inventory |
|
$ |
77 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
491 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
1 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration |
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither goodwill nor a gain from a bargain purchase was recognized in conjunction with the VeraSun
Acquisition, and no significant contingent assets or liabilities were acquired or assumed in the
acquisition.
The consolidated statements of income include the results of operations of the VeraSun Acquisition
commencing on the respective closing dates in the second quarter of 2009. As a result, pro forma
information for the three months ended March 31, 2010 has not been presented since the results of
operations of the VeraSun Acquisition have been included in our actual consolidated results of
operations for the entire period. The pro forma information presented below for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 assumes that the purchase price was funded with proceeds from the issuance of
$556 million of debt
9
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
on January 1, 2009. The consolidated pro forma operating revenues, net
income, and earnings per common share assuming dilution of the combined entity for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 had the VeraSun Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2009 are shown in
the table below (in millions,
except per share amounts). The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of
the results of future operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pro forma: |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
13,551 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
358 |
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
assuming dilution |
|
|
0.69 |
|
4. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On November 20, 2009, we announced the permanent shutdown of our Delaware City Refinery due to
financial losses caused by poor economic conditions, significant capital spending requirements, and
high operating costs. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.9 billion,
of which $1.4 billion represented the write-down of the book value of the refinery assets to net
realizable value. The results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been presented as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for both periods presented because
of the permanent shutdown of the refinery. Certain terminal and pipeline assets previously
associated with the refinery were not shut down and have continued to be operated, with the results
of their operations reflected in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income for
both periods presented.
In the first quarter of 2010, our board of directors approved a plan of sale for our terminal,
pipeline, and shutdown refinery assets at Delaware City. On April 7, 2010, we entered into an
agreement to sell those assets to wholly owned subsidiaries of PBF Energy Partners LP (PBF) for
$220 million in proceeds. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of 2010,
subject to regulatory approvals, as well as finalization of certain agreements with the state of
Delaware. As a result, the shutdown Delaware City Refinery assets and the associated terminal and
pipeline assets have been presented in the consolidated balance sheets within assets held for sale
and assets related to discontinued operations as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. All
other related assets, consisting primarily of accounts receivable and certain inventories, and
liabilities of the shutdown Delaware City Refinery that will not be sold are also presented as assets
and liabilities related to discontinued operations as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The
nature and significance of our post-closing participation in the terminalling agreement described
below represents a continuation of activities with the terminal operations of the Delaware City
Refinery for accounting purposes, and as such the results of operations related to these terminal
operations have not been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of
income for any of the periods presented.
In connection with this sale, we will enter into a terminalling and offtake agreement with PBF
under which PBF will provide certain terminalling services including receipt, storage, handling,
and redelivery of refined products for us. If PBF resumes refinery operations, the terminalling
agreement will terminate and we will purchase certain off-take products as prescribed in the
agreement. The initial term of this
10
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
agreement is for one year and shall automatically renew for 180-day periods until terminated
by either party.
Financial information related to the assets held for sale and the assets and liabilities related to
the discontinued operations is summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Related to |
|
|
|
|
Held |
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
for Sale |
|
Operations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Terminal and pipeline |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Related to |
|
|
|
|
Held |
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
for Sale |
|
Operations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Terminal and pipeline |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Results of operations for the Delaware City Refinery are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
Loss before income tax benefit |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
5. IMPAIRMENTS
Due to the economic slowdown that persisted throughout 2009 and its negative impact on the refining
industry, we evaluated our refining operating assets for potential impairment in 2009. Such
evaluations were based on expected future cash flows for each of our refineries using significant
estimates and assumptions about the future operations of those refineries, including overall
throughput volumes, types of crude oil processed, types of products produced, and prices for crude
oil and refined products. Prices for crude oil and refined products fluctuate significantly based
on market factors, including geopolitical matters. Prices, in turn, impact refinery throughput
assumptions. In addition, we considered matters specific to our Aruba Refinery and Paulsboro
Refinery to develop expected future cash flows for those refineries. We determined that there was
no indication of potential impairment of our refining operating assets as of December 31, 2009.
While the economy and refining industry fundamentals improved during the first quarter of 2010,
refining industry fundamentals continued to be negatively impacted by the economic slowdown. As a
result, we updated our evaluation of potential impairments of our refining operating assets as of
March 31, 2010, and we determined that there was no indication of impairment. Our cash flow
estimates are based on our continued expectation of improved refined product prices resulting from
an expected improvement in the worldwide economy, and we updated our assumptions related to matters
specific to our Aruba and Paulsboro Refineries that impact expected future cash flows for those
refineries. We believe that our estimates used to develop expected cash flows are reasonable;
however, future cash flows will differ from our estimates and such differences may be material.
The sensitivity of our estimates is most significant with respect to our Aruba and Paulsboro
Refineries. Therefore, should prices fail to improve as expected or other factors occur that
impact our expectations regarding these refineries, we may determine that either or both refineries
are impaired, and the resulting impairment loss could be material to our results of operations.
For further information regarding
impairments, see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
12
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery feedstocks |
|
$ |
2,549 |
|
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
Refined products and blendstocks |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
Ethanol feedstocks and products |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Convenience store merchandise |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
4,724 |
|
|
$ |
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the replacement cost (market value) of LIFO inventories
exceeded their LIFO carrying amounts by approximately $4.9 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively.
7. DEBT
Non-Bank Debt
In March 2009, we issued $750 million of 9.375% notes due March 15, 2019 and $250 million of 10.5%
notes due March 15, 2039. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled approximately $998
million, before deducting underwriting discounts and other issuance costs of $8 million.
In February 2010, we issued $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February 2015 and $850 million of
6.125% notes due in February 2020. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled approximately
$1.24 billion, before deducting underwriting discounts of $8 million.
On March 15, 2010, we redeemed our 7.50% senior notes with a maturity date of June 15, 2015 for
$294 million, or 102.5% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $296 million as of
the redemption date, resulting in a $2 million gain that was included in other income (expense),
net in the consolidated statement of income.
In March 2010, we called for redemption our 6.75% senior notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2014
for $190 million, or 102.25% of stated value. The redemption date was May 3, 2010. These notes
had a carrying amount of $187 million as of the redemption date, resulting in a loss on the
redemption of approximately $3 million.
Bank Credit Facilities
We have a revolving credit facility (the Revolver) that has a maturity date of November 2012.
As of March 31, 2010, the Revolver had a borrowing capacity of $2.4 billion. The Revolver
has certain restrictive covenants, including a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60%.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our debt-to-capitalization ratios, calculated in
accordance with the terms of the Revolver, were 30.6% and 30.9%, respectively.
We believe that we will remain in compliance with this covenant.
13
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the three months ended
March 31, 2010, we had no borrowings or repayments under our
Revolver or other revolving bank credit facilities. As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had no borrowings
outstanding under these
committed revolving credit facilities.
As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had $242 million
and $259 million, respectively, of letters of credit outstanding under our uncommitted
short-term bank credit facilities and $329 million and
$299 million, respectively, of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S.
committed revolving credit facilities. Under our Canadian committed revolving credit facility, we
had Cdn. $22 million of letters of credit outstanding as of both
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Accounts Receivable Sales Facility
We have an accounts receivable sales facility with a group of third-party entities and financial
institutions to sell on a revolving basis up to $1 billion of eligible trade receivables. We
amended our agreement in June 2009 to extend the maturity date to June 2010. As of December 31,
2009, the amount of eligible
receivables sold to the third-party entities and financial institutions was $200 million. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we sold and repaid $1.2 billion of eligible receivables to the
third-party entities and financial institutions. As of March 31, 2010, the amount of eligible
receivables sold to the third-party entities and financial institutions was $200 million. Proceeds
from the sale of receivables under this facility are reflected as debt in our consolidated balance
sheets.
Other Disclosures
The estimated fair value of our debt, including current portion, was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
$ |
8,313 |
|
|
$ |
7,364 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
9,329 |
|
|
|
8,228 |
|
8. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Treasury Stock
No significant purchases of our common stock were made during the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we issued 0.5 million and 0.2
million shares from treasury, respectively, for our employee benefit plans.
Common Stock Dividends
On April 29, 2010, our board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per
common share payable on June 16, 2010 to holders of record at the close of business on May 19,
2010.
14
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings (loss) per common share amounts were computed as follows (dollars and shares in millions,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Common |
|
Restricted |
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
Less dividends paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
Nonvested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per common share from continuing
operations assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
Common equivalent shares (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Performance awards and other benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Common equivalent shares were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 because the effect of including such shares would be
antidilutive. |
The following table reflects potentially dilutive securities that were excluded from the
calculation of earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations assuming dilution
as the effect of including such securities would have been antidilutive (in millions). For the
three months ended March 31, 2010, common equivalent shares, which represent primarily stock
options, were excluded as a
15
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
result of the net loss reported for the first quarter of 2010. In
addition, for both periods, certain stock option amounts presented below were excluded,
representing outstanding stock options for which the exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of the common shares during each respective reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equivalent shares |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
10. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
In order to determine net cash provided by operating activities, net income is adjusted by, among
other things, changes in current assets and current liabilities as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
Receivables, net |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(245 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in current assets and current liabilities |
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above changes in current assets and current liabilities differ from changes between amounts
reflected in the applicable consolidated balance sheets for the respective periods for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
the amounts shown above exclude changes in cash and temporary cash investments, deferred
income taxes, and current portion of debt and capital lease obligations, as well as the
effect of certain noncash investing and financing activities discussed below; |
|
|
|
|
amounts accrued for capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs are
reflected in investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows when such
amounts are paid; |
|
|
|
|
amounts accrued for common stock purchases in the open market that are not settled as of
the balance sheet date are reflected in financing activities in the consolidated statements
of cash flows when the purchases are settled and paid; |
|
|
|
|
changes in assets and liabilities related to the discontinued operations of the Delaware
City Refinery prior to its shutdown are reflected in the line items to which the changes
relate in the table above; and |
|
|
|
|
certain differences between consolidated balance sheet changes and consolidated
statement of cash flow changes reflected above result from translating foreign currency
denominated amounts at different exchange rates. |
16
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
There were no significant noncash investing or financing activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Cash flows related to the discontinued operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been combined
with the cash flows from continuing operations within each category in the consolidated statements
of cash flows for both periods presented and are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
Cash flows related to interest and income taxes were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid in excess of (less than) amount capitalized |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Income taxes paid (net of tax refunds received) |
|
|
(839 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
A fair value hierarchy (Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3) is used to categorize fair value amounts
based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value. Accordingly, fair values determined by
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair
values determined by Level 2 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include
situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. We use
appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of our
applicable assets and liabilities. When available, we measure fair value using Level 1 inputs
because they generally provide the most reliable evidence of fair value.
The tables below present information (dollars in millions) about our financial assets and
liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the fair value
hierarchy of the inputs utilized by us to determine the fair values as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
17
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Total as of |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
Nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
Certain nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
Total as of |
|
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
December 31, |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
Nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Certain nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
The valuation methods used to measure our financial instruments at fair value are as follows:
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts, consisting primarily of exchange-traded futures and
swaps, are measured at fair value using the market approach. Exchange-traded futures are
valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy. Swaps are priced using third-party broker quotes, industry pricing
services, and exchange-traded curves, with appropriate consideration of counterparty credit
risk, but since they have contractual terms that are not identical to exchange-traded
futures instruments with a comparable market price, these financial instruments are
categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
|
|
|
The nonqualified benefit plan assets and certain nonqualified benefit plan liabilities
categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a
market approach based on quotations from national securities exchanges. The nonqualified
benefit plan assets categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy represent insurance
contracts, the fair values of which are provided by the insurer. |
As of March 31, 2010, our obligation to pay cash collateral to brokers under master netting
arrangements of $25 million was netted against the fair value of the commodity derivatives
reflected in Level 1. As of December 31, 2009, cash received from brokers of $64 million,
resulting from the equity in broker accounts covered by master netting arrangements exceeding the
minimum margin requirements for such accounts, was netted against the fair value of the commodity
derivatives reflected in Level 1. Certain of our commodity derivative contracts under master
netting arrangements include both asset and liability
18
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
positions. We have elected to offset the
fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative instruments executed with the same
counterparty, including any related cash collateral asset or obligation.
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances (in millions) for fair value
measurements developed using significant unobservable inputs for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Net unrealized gains included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2009, which are reported in other income
(expense), net in the consolidated statement of income, related to the three-year earn-out
agreement with Alon Refining Krotz Springs Inc. (Alon) that was entered into in connection with the
sale of our Krotz Springs Refinery and was settled in August 2009. These unrealized gains were
offset by the recognition
in other income (expense), net of losses on derivative instruments entered into to hedge the risk
of changes in the fair value of the Alon earn-out agreement.
12. PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of commodities, interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we enter into derivative instruments to manage those
risks. We also enter into derivative instruments to manage the price risk on other contractual
derivatives into which we have entered. The only types of derivative instruments we enter into
are those related to the various commodities we purchase or produce, interest rate swaps,
and foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts, as described below.
All derivative instruments are recorded on our balance
sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair values.
When we enter into a derivative instrument, it is designated as a fair value hedge, a cash flow
hedge, an economic hedge, or a trading activity. The gain or loss on a derivative instrument
designated and qualifying as a fair value hedge, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the
hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized currently in income in the same period.
The effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as
a cash flow hedge is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and is then
recorded in income in the period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects
income. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the cash flow derivative instrument, if
any, is recognized in income as incurred. For our economic hedging relationships (hedges not
designated as fair value or cash flow hedges) and for derivative instruments entered into by us for
trading purposes, the derivative instrument is recorded at fair value and changes in the fair value
of the derivative instrument are recognized currently in income. The cash flow effects of all of
our derivative contracts are reflected in operating activities in the consolidated statements of
cash flows for both periods presented.
19
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily
gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), and natural gas used in our refining operations.
To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we use
commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options. We use the futures
markets for the available liquidity, which
provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging
and trading operations. We use swaps primarily to convert our floating price exposure to a fixed
price. Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily
basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has
been approved by our board of directors.
For risk management purposes, we use fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, and economic hedges. In
addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk, we also enter into
certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes. Our objective for entering into
each type of hedge or trading activity is described below.
Fair Value Hedges
Fair value hedges are used to hedge certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase
inventories. The level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our
operating inventories, and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our
previous year-end LIFO inventory levels.
As of March 31, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes in thousands of
barrels).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
Derivative Instrument / Maturity |
|
Contract Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil)
|
|
|
12,036 |
|
20
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash Flow Hedges
Cash flow hedges are used to hedge certain forecasted feedstock and product purchases, refined
product sales, and natural gas purchases. The objective of our cash flow hedges is to lock in the
price of forecasted feedstock, product, or natural gas purchases or refined product sales at
existing market prices that are deemed favorable by management.
As of March 31, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into to hedge forecasted purchases or sales of crude oil and refined products. The
information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity
(volumes in thousands of barrels).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
Derivative Instrument / Maturity |
|
Contract Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
11,925 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
20,025 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
11,925 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
20,025 |
|
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
89 |
|
21
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Economic Hedges
Economic hedges are hedges not designated as fair value or cash flow hedges that are used to (i)
manage price volatility in certain refinery feedstock, refined product, and corn inventories, and
(ii) manage price volatility in certain forecasted refinery feedstock, product, and corn
purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas purchases. Our objective in entering into
economic hedges is consistent with the objectives discussed above for fair value hedges and cash
flow hedges. However, the economic hedges are not designated as a fair value hedge or a cash flow
hedge for accounting purposes, usually due to the difficulty of establishing the required
documentation at the date that the derivative instrument is entered into that would allow us to
achieve hedge deferral accounting.
As of March 31, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into as economic hedges. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by
type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes in thousands of barrels, except those identified
as corn contracts that are presented in thousands of bushels).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
Derivative Instrument / Maturity |
|
Contract Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
82,679 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
39,621 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
8,475 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
48,600 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
5,850 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,950 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
63,691 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
54,114 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
11,475 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
48,600 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
5,850 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,950 |
|
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
150,251 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
63,635 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
26,501 |
|
2010 (corn) |
|
|
6,070 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
66 |
|
2011 (corn) |
|
|
150 |
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
142,324 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
52,155 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
45,238 |
|
2010 (corn) |
|
|
25,255 |
|
2011 (corn) |
|
|
860 |
|
Options long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
6 |
|
22
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Trading Activities
Derivatives entered into for trading activities represent commodity derivative instruments held or
issued for trading purposes. Our objective in entering into commodity derivative instruments for
trading purposes is to take advantage of existing market conditions related to crude oil and
refined products that management perceives as opportunities to benefit our results of operations
and cash flows, but for which there are no related physical transactions.
As of March 31, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into for trading purposes. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by
type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes represent thousands of barrels, except those
identified as natural gas contracts that are presented in billions of British thermal units).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
Derivative Instrument / Maturity |
|
Contract Volumes |
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
13,188 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,853 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
9,330 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
2,565 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
600 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
12,930 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,886 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
9,555 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
2,250 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
915 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
20,561 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,179 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
7,454 |
|
2010 (natural gas) |
|
|
310 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
1,040 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
10 |
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
22,334 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,121 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
7,307 |
|
2010 (natural gas) |
|
|
310 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
950 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
70 |
|
Options long: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
3,136 |
|
Options short: |
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
5,136 |
|
23
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary market risk exposure for changes in interest rates relates to our debt obligations. We
manage our exposure to changing interest rates through the use of a combination of fixed-rate and
floating-rate debt. In addition, we have at times used interest rate swap agreements to manage our
fixed to floating interest rate position by converting certain fixed-rate debt to floating-rate
debt. These interest rate swap agreements are generally accounted for as fair value hedges.
However, we have not had any outstanding interest rate swap agreements since 2006.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations on transactions related to our Canadian operations.
To manage our exposure to these exchange rate fluctuations, we use foreign currency exchange and
purchase contracts. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting
purposes, and therefore they are classified as economic hedges. As of March 31, 2010, we had
commitments to purchase $189 million of U.S. dollars. These commitments matured on or before
April 16, 2010, resulting in a $1 million loss in the second quarter of 2010.
24
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The following tables provide information about the fair values of our derivative instruments as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in millions) and the line items in the balance sheet in which
the fair values are reflected. See Note 11 for additional information related to the fair values
of our derivative instruments. As indicated in Note 11, we net fair value amounts recognized for
multiple similar derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under master netting
arrangements. The tables below, however, are presented on a gross asset and gross liability basis,
which results in the reflection of certain assets in liability accounts and certain liabilities in
asset accounts. In addition, in Note 11 we netted cash collateral
payable to brokers and cash received from brokers against the
fair value of the commodity derivatives; these cash amounts are not reflected in the tables
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
March 31, |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
March 31, |
|
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
32 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
35 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
64 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
254 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
224 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
353 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
238 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
7 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
32 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,128 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
424 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
321 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
869 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
882 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
8 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
3,442 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
4,093 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
December 31, |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
37 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
308 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
271 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
579 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
415 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
28 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as
hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
29 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,101 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
506 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
370 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
1,037 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
46 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
62 |
|
Options |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
3,729 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
4,658 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market and Counterparty Risk
Our price risk management activities involve the receipt or payment of fixed price commitments into
the future. These transactions give rise to market risk, the risk that future changes in market
conditions may make an instrument less valuable. We closely monitor and manage our exposure to
market risk on a daily basis in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors.
Market risks are monitored by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk
management policy. Concentrations of customers in the refining industry may impact our overall
exposure to counterparty risk, in that these customers may be similarly affected by changes in
economic or other conditions. In addition, financial services companies are the counterparties in
certain of our price risk management activities, and such financial services companies may be
adversely affected by periods of uncertainty and illiquidity in the credit and capital markets.
As of March 31, 2010, we had net receivables related to derivative instruments of $19 million from
counterparties in the refining industry and $83 million from counterparties in the financial
services industry. As of December 31, 2009, we had net receivables related to derivative
instruments of $19 million from counterparties in the refining industry and $157 million from
counterparties in the
26
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial services industry. These amounts represent the aggregate amount
payable to us by companies in those industries, reduced by payables from us to those companies
under master netting arrangements that allow for the setoff of amounts receivable from and payable
to the same party. We do not require any collateral or other security to support derivative instruments into which we enter. We also do not
have any derivative instruments that require us to maintain a minimum investment-grade credit
rating.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income
The following tables provide information about the gain or loss recognized in income and other
comprehensive income on our derivative instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 (in millions), and the line items in the financial statements in which such gains and losses
are reflected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
|
Amount of |
Derivatives in |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
Fair Value |
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized |
|
Recognized in Income |
Hedging |
|
Income on |
|
Income on |
|
Income on |
|
in Income on |
|
for Ineffective Portion |
Relationships |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
Hedged Item |
|
Hedged Item |
|
of Derivative (1) |
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For fair value hedges, no component of the derivative instruments gains or losses was
excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. No amounts were recognized in income for
hedged firm commitments that no longer qualify as fair value hedges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Amount of |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Amount of |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Accumulated |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Recognized in |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
Derivatives in |
|
Recognized in |
|
OCI |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Income on |
|
Recognized in |
Cash Flow |
|
OCI on |
|
into Income |
|
Accumulated OCI |
|
Derivatives |
|
Income on |
Hedging |
|
Derivatives |
|
(Effective |
|
into Income |
|
(Ineffective |
|
Derivatives |
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Portion) |
|
(Ineffective Portion) (1) |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts
(2) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No component of the derivative instruments gains or losses was excluded from the assessment
of hedge effectiveness. |
|
(2) |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, cash flow hedges primarily related to forward
sales of distillates and associated forward purchases of crude oil, with $84 million of
cumulative after-tax gains on cash flow hedges remaining in accumulated other comprehensive
income as of March 31, 2010. We expect that all of the deferred gains at
March 31, 2010 will be reclassified into cost of sales over the
next 12 months as a result
of hedged transactions that are forecasted to occur. The amount ultimately realized in
income, however, will differ as commodity prices change. For the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, there were no amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into
income as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting. |
27
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
Derivatives Designated as |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
Economic Hedges |
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
and Other |
|
Income on |
|
Income on |
Derivative Instruments |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
$ |
96 |
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alon earn-out agreement |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Alon earn-out hedge
(commodity contracts) |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of |
|
Amount of |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
Derivatives Designated as |
|
Income on |
|
Income on |
Trading Activities |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Prior to the second quarter of 2009, we had two reportable segments, which were refining and
retail. As a result of the VeraSun Acquisition during the second quarter of 2009 (as discussed in
Note 3), ethanol is presented as a third reportable segment.
The following table reflects activity related to continuing operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
Retail |
|
Ethanol |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
16,897 |
|
|
$ |
2,176 |
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,643 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external customers |
|
|
11,696 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,328 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
593 |
|
Total assets by reportable segment were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
$ |
31,114 |
|
|
$ |
30,901 |
|
Retail |
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
Ethanol |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
36,465 |
|
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate assets primarily include cash, corporate office buildings, and income tax receivables that may exist from time to time.
29
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to our defined benefit plans were as follows
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our anticipated contributions to our qualified pension plans during 2010 have not changed from
amounts previously disclosed in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009. During both of the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we
contributed $50 million to our qualified pension plans.
In March 2010, a comprehensive health care reform package composed of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Health Care
Reform) was enacted into law. As a result of the Health Care Reform, the income tax benefit
presented in our consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2010
includes a charge of $16 million related to the non-deductibility of certain retiree prescription
health care costs, to the extent of federal subsidies received. Although the tax change provisions
of the Health Care Reform are not effective until 2013, the effect of changes in tax laws or rates
on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the period that includes the enactment
date, even though the changes may not be effective until future periods. Other provisions of the
Health Care Reform are also expected to affect the future costs of our retiree health care plans.
An estimate of the additional impacts of the Health Care Reform is not yet practicable due to the
number and complexity of the provisions; however, we are currently evaluating the potential impact
of the Health Care Reform on our financial position and results of operations.
30
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Tax Matters
We are subject to extensive tax liabilities, including federal, state, and foreign income taxes and
transactional taxes such as excise, sales/use, payroll, franchise, withholding, and ad valorem
taxes. New tax laws and regulations and changes in existing tax laws and regulations are
continuously being enacted or proposed that could result in increased expenditures for tax
liabilities in the future. Many of these liabilities are subject to periodic audits by the
respective taxing authority. Subsequent changes to our tax liabilities as a result of these audits
may subject us to interest and penalties.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Government of Aruba (GOA) enacted a turnover tax on revenues from
the sale of goods produced and services rendered in Aruba. The turnover tax, which initially was
3% for on-island sales and services (but has subsequently been reduced to 1.5%) and 1% on export
sales, is being assessed by the GOA on sales by our Aruba Refinery. We disputed the GOAs
assessment of the turnover tax in arbitration proceedings with the Netherlands Arbitration
Institute (NAI) pursuant to which we sought to enforce our rights under a tax holiday agreement
related to the refinery and other agreements. The arbitration hearing was held on February 3-4,
2009. We also filed protests of these assessments through proceedings in Aruba.
In April 2008, we entered into an escrow agreement with the GOA and Caribbean Mercantile Bank NV
(CMB), pursuant to which we agreed to deposit an amount equal to the disputed turnover tax on
exports into an escrow account with CMB, pending resolution of the tax protest proceedings in
Aruba. Under this escrow agreement, we are required to continue to deposit an amount equal to the
disputed tax on a monthly basis until the tax dispute is resolved through the Aruba proceedings.
On April 20, 2009, we were notified that the Aruban tax court overruled our protests with respect
to the turnover tax assessed in January and February 2007, totaling $8 million. Under the escrow
agreement, we expensed and paid $8 million, plus $1 million of interest, to the GOA in the second
quarter of 2009. Amounts deposited under the escrow agreement, which totaled $115 million as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are reflected as restricted cash in our consolidated balance
sheets. In addition to the turnover tax described above, the GOA has asserted other tax amounts
including approximately $35 million related to various dividends. We also challenged approximately
$35 million in foreign exchange payments made to the Central Bank of Aruba as payments exempted
under our tax holiday, as well as other reasons. Both the dividend tax and the foreign exchange
payment matters were also addressed in the arbitration proceedings discussed above.
On November 3, 2009, we received an interim First Partial Award from the NAI arbitral panel. The
panels ruling validated our tax holiday agreement, but the panel also ruled in favor of the GOA on
our dispute of the $35 million in foreign exchange payments previously made to the Central Bank of
Aruba. The panels decision did not, however, fully resolve the remaining two items in the
arbitration, the applicable dividend tax rate and the turnover tax. With respect to the dividend
tax, the panel ruled that the dividend tax was not a profit tax covered by the tax holiday
agreement, but the panel did not address the fact that Aruban companies with tax holidays are
subject to a 0% dividend withholding rate rather than the 5% rate alleged by the GOA. With respect
to the turnover tax, the panel did reject our contractual claims but it decided that our
non-contractual claims against the turnover tax merited further discussion with and review by the
panel before a final decision could be rendered. Prior to this interim decision, no expense or
liability had been recognized in our consolidated financial statements with respect to unfunded
amounts. In light of the uncertain timing of any final resolution of these claims as a result of
31
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
the First Partial Award from the panel, we recorded a loss contingency accrual of approximately
$140 million, including interest, with respect to both the dividend and turnover taxes.
Following the November ruling, we entered into settlement discussions with the GOA. On
February 24, 2010, we signed a settlement agreement that details the parties proposed terms for
settlement of these disputes and provides a framework for taxation of our operations in Aruba on a
go-forward basis as our tax holiday was set to expire on December 31, 2010. Under the proposed
settlement, we will make a payment to the GOA of $118 million in consideration of a full release of
all tax claims prior to the effective date of the settlement, including the turnover tax disputed
in the Netherlands Arbitration. The GOA will eliminate the turnover tax on exports as of the
effective date of the settlement. In addition, we will agree to exit the tax holiday regime
following the effective date of the settlement agreement and will enter into a new tax regime under
which we will be subject to a net profit tax of less than 10% on an overall basis. Beginning on
the second anniversary of the settlement agreements effective date, we will also begin to make an
annual prepayment of taxes of $10 million, with the ability to carry forward any excess tax
prepayments to future tax years. The proposed settlement will not be effective until the
settlement agreement is approved by the Aruban Parliament and certain laws and regulations are
modified and/or established to provide for the terms of the settlement. The parties anticipate
that this will occur on or before June 1, 2010. If the settlement is not effective as of June 1,
2010, we both have the right to terminate the settlement agreement and return to arbitration and
the on-island proceedings to continue litigation.
Litigation
MTBE Litigation
As of May 7, 2010, we were named as a defendant in 38 active cases alleging liability related to
MTBE contamination in groundwater. The plaintiffs are generally water providers, governmental
authorities, and private water companies alleging that refiners and marketers of MTBE and gasoline
containing MTBE are liable for manufacturing or distributing a defective product. We have been
named in these lawsuits together with many other refining industry companies. We are being sued
primarily as a refiner and marketer of MTBE and gasoline containing MTBE. We do not own or operate
gasoline station facilities in most of the geographic locations in which damage is alleged to have
occurred. The lawsuits generally seek individual, unquantified compensatory and punitive damages,
injunctive relief, and attorneys fees. Many of the cases are pending in federal court and are
consolidated for pre-trial proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York (Multi-District Litigation Docket No. 1358, In re: Methyl-Tertiary Butyl Ether Products
Liability Litigation). Twenty cases are pending in state court. Discovery is open in all cases.
We believe that we have strong defenses to all claims and are vigorously defending the lawsuits.
We recently reached an agreement to settle 25 of the MTBE lawsuits. Final settlement is
subject to formal adoption of the settlement agreement under the administrative procedures of the
various plaintiffs. We expect this process to be completed in the
second quarter of
2010. We have recorded a loss contingency liability with respect to our MTBE
litigation portfolio. While we believe that it is reasonably possible that we may suffer a loss
with respect to one or more of the lawsuits in excess of the amount accrued, we do not believe that
such an outcome in any one or more of these lawsuits would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations or financial position.
32
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Retail Fuel Temperature Litigation
As of May 7, 2010, we were named in 21 consumer class action lawsuits relating to fuel
temperature. We have been named in these lawsuits together with several other defendants in the
retail and wholesale petroleum marketing business. The complaints, filed in federal courts in
several states, allege that because fuel volume increases with fuel temperature, the defendants
have violated state consumer protection laws by failing to adjust the volume or price of fuel when
the fuel temperature exceeded
60 degrees Fahrenheit. The complaints seek to certify classes of
retail consumers who purchased fuel in various locations. The complaints seek an order compelling
the installation of temperature correction devices as well as monetary relief. The federal
lawsuits are consolidated into a multi-district litigation case in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Kansas (Multi-District Litigation Docket No. 1840, In re: Motor Fuel Temperature Sales
Practices Litigation). Discovery has commenced. We expect the court to issue its ruling on the
Kansas-based class certification motion only in the second quarter of 2010, and then make a
decision on how to further proceed with the rest of the docket. We believe that we have several
strong defenses to these lawsuits and intend to contest them. We have not recorded a loss
contingency liability with respect to this matter, but due to the inherent uncertainty of
litigation, we believe that it is reasonably possible that we may suffer a loss with respect to one
or more of the lawsuits. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss from an adverse result
in all or substantially all of these cases cannot reasonably be made.
Rosolowski
Rosolowski v. Clark Refining & Marketing, Inc., et al., Judicial Circuit Court, Cook County,
Illinois (Case No. 95-L 014703). We assumed this lawsuit in our acquisition of Premcor Inc. The
lawsuit relates in part to a 1994 release to the atmosphere of spent catalyst from the now-closed
Blue Island, Illinois refinery. The case was certified as a class action in 2000 with three
classes, two of which received nominal or no damages, and one of which received a sizeable jury
verdict. That class consisted of local residents who claimed property damage or loss of use and
enjoyment of their property over a period of several years. In 2005, the jury returned a verdict
for the plaintiffs of $80 million in compensatory damages and $40 million in punitive damages.
However, following our motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict (citing,
among other things, misconduct by plaintiffs counsel and improper class certification), the trial
judge in 2006 vacated the jurys award and decertified the class. Plaintiffs appealed, and in June
2008 the state appeals court reversed the trial judges decision to decertify the class and set
aside the judgment. Thereafter, the Illinois Supreme Court refused to hear the case and returned
it to the trial court. We submitted renewed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or,
alternatively, a new trial. During the first quarter of 2010, we reached an agreement with our
insurance carrier on a claim of insurance coverage related to this litigation resulting in pre-tax
income of $40 million that was recorded as a reduction to general and administrative expenses. We
have also reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to settle this litigation.
We expect to finalize the settlement agreement in the second quarter of 2010.
We do
not believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material effect on our
financial position or results of operations.
Other Litigation
We are also a party to additional claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. We believe that there is only a remote likelihood that future costs related to known
contingent liabilities related to these legal proceedings would have a material adverse impact on
our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
33
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
16. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In conjunction with the acquisition of Premcor Inc. on September 1, 2005, Valero Energy Corporation
fully and unconditionally guaranteed the following debt of The Premcor Refining Group Inc. (PRG), a
wholly owned subsidiary of Valero Energy Corporation, that was outstanding as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
6.75% senior notes due February 2011, |
|
|
|
|
6.125% senior notes due May 2011, and |
|
|
|
|
6.75% senior notes due May 2014. |
In addition, PRG has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of the outstanding debt issued by
Valero Energy Corporation.
The following condensed consolidating financial information is provided for Valero and PRG as an
alternative to providing separate financial statements for PRG. The accounts for all companies
reflected herein are presented using the equity method of accounting for investments in
subsidiaries.
34
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2010
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments |
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
3,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,947 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
4,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
Assets held for sale and assets related to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
10,101 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
11,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
25,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,186 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(5,435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
19,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
Investment in Valero Energy affiliates |
|
|
6,107 |
|
|
|
4,093 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes receivable from affiliates |
|
|
15,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax receivable |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
23,693 |
|
|
$ |
8,299 |
|
|
$ |
31,229 |
|
|
$ |
(26,756 |
) |
|
$ |
36,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
5,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,986 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
6,889 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
8,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
7,482 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
9,370 |
|
|
|
(15,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,879 |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
6,760 |
|
|
|
(10,479 |
) |
|
|
7,879 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(6,688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,688 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
13,036 |
|
|
|
(3,718 |
) |
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
13,036 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
14,666 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
(10,195 |
) |
|
|
14,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
23,693 |
|
|
$ |
8,299 |
|
|
$ |
31,229 |
|
|
$ |
(26,756 |
) |
|
$ |
36,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
747 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
888 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
Assets held for sale and assets related to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
10,392 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
11,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
24,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,463 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
(5,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
19,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
Investment in Valero Energy affiliates |
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(10,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes receivable from affiliates |
|
|
14,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax receivable |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
22,515 |
|
|
$ |
8,239 |
|
|
$ |
31,054 |
|
|
$ |
(26,179 |
) |
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
7,747 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
6,236 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
|
|
8,257 |
|
|
|
(14,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
4,112 |
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,896 |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
6,887 |
|
|
|
(10,606 |
) |
|
|
7,896 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
13,178 |
|
|
|
(3,644 |
) |
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
13,178 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
14,725 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
10,263 |
|
|
|
(10,331 |
) |
|
|
14,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
22,515 |
|
|
$ |
8,239 |
|
|
$ |
31,054 |
|
|
$ |
(26,179 |
) |
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,788 |
|
|
$ |
21,473 |
|
|
$ |
(5,618 |
) |
|
$ |
19,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,157 |
|
|
|
19,597 |
|
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
|
|
18,136 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
912 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
|
21,073 |
|
|
|
(5,618 |
) |
|
|
19,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) (1) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) reflected in each column does not include any tax effect
of the equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries. |
37
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,238 |
|
|
$ |
13,704 |
|
|
$ |
(2,614 |
) |
|
$ |
13,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
11,536 |
|
|
|
(2,614 |
) |
|
|
11,204 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
845 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
12,923 |
|
|
|
(2,614 |
) |
|
|
12,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593 |
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) (1) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
364 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
(263 |
) |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) reflected in each column does not include any tax effect
of the equity in earnings of subsidiaries. |
38
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
911 |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
Purchase of ethanol facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
Net intercompany loans |
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Return of investment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
(856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-bank debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
Accounts receivable sales program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of receivables |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee
benefit plans |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Benefit from tax deduction in excess of recognized
stock-based compensation cost |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Dividend to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Net intercompany borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
(1,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
(1,318 |
) |
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
(201 |
) |
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(735 |
) |
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
Advance payments related to purchase of ethanol facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Net
intercompany loans |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
used in investing activities |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
(909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-bank debt repayments |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
Accounts receivable sales program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee benefit plans |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Benefit from tax deduction in excess of recognized stock-based
compensation cost |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
Net intercompany borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775 |
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION
REFORM ACT OF 1995
This
Form 10-Q, including without limitation our discussion below under
the heading Overview and Outlook, includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify
our forward-looking statements by the words anticipate, believe, expect, plan, intend,
estimate, project, projection, predict, budget, forecast, goal, guidance, target,
could, should, may, and similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding:
|
|
|
future refining margins, including gasoline and distillate margins; |
|
|
|
|
future retail margins, including gasoline, diesel, home heating oil, and convenience
store merchandise margins; |
|
|
|
|
future ethanol margins and the effect of the acquisition of certain ethanol plants on
our results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding feedstock costs, including crude oil differentials, and operating
expenses; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated levels of crude oil and refined product inventories; |
|
|
|
|
our anticipated level of capital investments, including deferred refinery turnaround and
catalyst costs and capital expenditures for environmental and other purposes, and the
effect of those capital investments on our results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated trends in the supply of and demand for crude oil and other feedstocks and
refined products in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere; |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding environmental, tax, and other regulatory initiatives; and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of general economic and other conditions on refining and retail industry
fundamentals. |
We based our forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates, and projections
about ourselves and our industry. We caution that these statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that we cannot predict. In addition,
we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove
to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from the future
performance that we have expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements. Differences
between actual results and any future performance suggested in these forward-looking statements
could result from a variety of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
acts of terrorism aimed at either our facilities or other facilities that could impair
our ability to produce or transport refined products or receive feedstocks; |
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions in nations that consume refined products, including
the United States, and in crude oil producing regions, including the Middle East and South
America; |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign demand for, and supplies of, refined products such as gasoline,
diesel fuel, jet fuel, home heating oil, and petrochemicals; |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign demand for, and supplies of, crude oil and other feedstocks; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
to agree on and to maintain crude oil price and production controls; |
|
|
|
|
the level of consumer demand, including seasonal fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
refinery overcapacity or undercapacity; |
|
|
|
|
the actions taken by competitors, including both pricing and adjustments to refining
capacity in response to market conditions; |
41
|
|
|
the level of foreign imports of refined products; |
|
|
|
|
accidents or other unscheduled shutdowns affecting our refineries, machinery, pipelines,
or equipment, or those of our suppliers or customers; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the cost or availability of transportation for feedstocks and refined
products; |
|
|
|
|
the price, availability, and acceptance of alternative fuels and alternative-fuel
vehicles; |
|
|
|
|
delay of, cancellation of, or failure to implement planned capital projects and realize
the various assumptions and benefits projected for such projects or cost overruns in
constructing such planned capital projects; |
|
|
|
|
ethanol margins may be lower than expected; |
|
|
|
|
earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and irregular weather, which can unforeseeably
affect the price or availability of natural gas, refinery, ethanol, and other feedstocks,
and refined products; |
|
|
|
|
rulings, judgments, or settlements in litigation or other legal or regulatory matters,
including unexpected environmental remediation costs, in excess of any reserves or
insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory action, including the introduction or enactment of federal,
state, municipal, or foreign legislation or rulemakings, including tax and environmental
regulations, which may adversely affect our business or operations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities and trade credit; |
|
|
|
|
changes in currency exchange rates, including the value of the Canadian dollar relative
to the U.S. dollar; and |
|
|
|
|
overall economic conditions, including the stability and liquidity of financial markets. |
Any one of these factors, or a combination of these factors, could materially affect our future
results of operations and whether any forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be accurate.
Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and
future performance may differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements.
We do not intend to update these statements unless we are required by the securities laws to do so.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting
on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. We undertake no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to any such forward-looking statements
that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
42
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
For the first quarter of 2010, we reported a loss from continuing operations of $101 million, or
$0.18 per share, compared to income from continuing operations of $364 million, or $0.70 per share,
for the first quarter of 2009. The first quarter 2010 loss is primarily due to a $51 million
operating loss in our refining segment, as compared to operating income of $693 million for the
first quarter of 2009. The decline in refining operating income was primarily due to lower margins
for most of the products we produce. We believe the economic slowdown has
negatively impacted refined product margins by weakening the demand for those products and causing product
inventories to build in the U.S. and throughout the world. There has also been a significant
increase in worldwide refining capacity due in part to strong worldwide economic growth in 2004
through 2007. This increase in capacity has contributed to a further increase in the available supply of
refined products.
We responded to this negative economic environment and its impact on our business by assessing the
operating performance and profitability of our refining segment assets. This has resulted in a
reduction in refinery utilization to optimize the profitability of each of our assets. In
addition, this assessment led to our decision to shut down our Aruba Refinery temporarily in July
2009 and to shut down our Delaware City Refinery permanently in November 2009. We also have
temporarily suspended construction activity on various capital projects and permanently cancelled
other projects in order to reduce the use of cash for capital expenditures. Due to the shutdown of
our Delaware City Refinery, we have reflected its results of operations as discontinued operations
in our consolidated statements of income for both periods presented, and we have excluded our
Delaware City Refinery from the operating highlights and refining operating highlights tables
that follow this overview.
Last year, we concluded that the Aruba Refinery, which processes heavy sour crude oil, was
temporarily uneconomical to operate due to a narrowing of the heavy sour crude oil differential.
The heavy sour crude oil differential is the difference between the price of sweet crude oil and
the price of heavy sour crude oil. This differential began to narrow in the first quarter of 2009
due to the decreased production of sour crude oil in response to lower
worldwide demand for all types of crude oil. The heavy sour crude oil differential continued to
narrow throughout 2009 and remained narrow during the first quarter of 2010 relative to the price
of sweet crude oil. As a result, the Aruba Refinery remained shut during the first quarter of
2010, which contributed to our throughput volumes for the first quarter of 2010 being 254,000
barrels per day lower than the first quarter of 2009. In addition, the Government of Arubas (GOA)
turnover tax introduced on January 1, 2007 further contributed to the uneconomical evaluation of the refinery.
The settlement agreement signed by us and the GOA in February 2010 provides for the repeal of
the turnover tax and a more stable overall tax regime. We anticipate that the settlement agreement
will be approved by the Aruban Parliament and new laws enacted to implement the settlement
agreements provisions prior to June 1, 2010.
However, notwithstanding the
settlement and new tax structure with the GOA, refining economics may not recover sufficiently to justify restarting this refinery.
In the second quarter of 2009, we entered the ethanol business through the acquisition of seven
ethanol facilities, and we acquired three additional facilities in the first quarter of 2010. We
entered the ethanol business because we believe that ethanol has
become and will continue to be a part of the transportation fuel supply mix in the U.S. We believe
that ethanol is a natural fit for us because we manufacture transportation fuels. During the first
quarter of 2010, our ethanol segment generated operating income of $57 million. There are
no comparative operating results for the first quarter of 2009 because this business was acquired
after the first quarter of 2009. The ethanol business is dependent on margins between ethanol and corn feedstocks and
can be impacted by U.S. government subsidies and biofuels (including ethanol) mandates.
43
Our retail segment generated operating income of $71 million for the first quarter of 2010,
compared to operating income of $56 million for the first quarter of 2009. The first quarter 2010
results are primarily due to strong retail fuel margins.
We continued to focus on maintaining our financial strength and liquidity during the current
challenging economic times, and as a result, we issued $1.25 billion in debt during the first
quarter of 2010 at interest rates favorable to those on our existing debt. We used a portion of
the proceeds to redeem our 7.50% senior notes for $294 million on March 15, 2010, and our
6.75% senior notes for $190 million on May 3, 2010; the remainder was used for general corporate purposes.
As 2010 progresses, we expect the U.S. and worldwide economies to continue to recover slowly, and we
expect refined product demand to increase. The increase in anticipated refined product demand is
expected to result in an increase in crude oil production, which we believe will result in the
production of more sour crude oils
and improved sour crude oil differentials. Thus far in 2010, sour crude oil
differentials have improved somewhat from the very low first quarter 2009 levels. The expected
increases in refined product demand and increases in sour crude oil production should favorably impact refined
product margins. However, we expect that the current surplus and growth in global refining
capacity will put pressure on refining margins and could result in continuing production constraints or
refinery shutdowns in the refining industry. We will continue to optimize our refining assets
based on market conditions.
During the remainder of 2010 and beyond, we will continue to monitor the progress and status of
carbon emission legislation (e.g., cap-and-trade) and the increased regulation from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Transportation (automobiles, aircraft, railroads, and shipping)
and utility (electricity generation and residential heating) activities have significant carbon
footprints. Our refined products are an energy source for many of these activities. As
such, future regulatory and tax legislation over carbon emissions could have a significant impact
on the supply, demand, and cost of our refined products, which could have a significant adverse
affect on our business.
44
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables highlight our results of operations, our operating performance, and market
prices that directly impact our operations. The narrative following these tables provides an
analysis of our results of operations.
First Quarter 2010 Compared to First Quarter 2009
Financial Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 (a) (b) |
|
2009 (b) |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
19,643 |
|
|
$ |
13,328 |
|
|
$ |
6,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
18,136 |
|
|
|
11,204 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Retail |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Ethanol |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Asset impairment loss (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
19,675 |
|
|
|
12,735 |
|
|
|
6,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
(465 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes (b) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
(422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming
dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
(0.88 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
(0.79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
the footnote references on page 49. |
45
Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel and per gallon amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
(744 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
5.79 |
|
|
$ |
8.87 |
|
|
$ |
(3.08 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.41 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
6.06 |
|
|
$ |
5.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedstocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy sour crude |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
Medium/light sour crude |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
Acidic sweet crude |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Sweet crude |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Residuals |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Other feedstocks |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total feedstocks |
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
Blendstocks and other |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total throughput volumes |
|
|
2,095 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields (thousand barrels per day): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasolines and blendstocks |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Distillates |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
Petrochemicals |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other products (e) |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total yields |
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
Company-operated fuel sites (average) |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Fuel volumes (gallons per day per site) |
|
|
4,942 |
|
|
|
4,984 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Fuel margin per gallon |
|
$ |
0.139 |
|
|
$ |
0.117 |
|
|
$ |
0.022 |
|
Merchandise sales |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Retail selling expenses |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Canada: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Fuel volumes (thousand gallons per day) |
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
Fuel margin per gallon |
|
$ |
0.299 |
|
|
$ |
0.250 |
|
|
$ |
0.049 |
|
Merchandise sales |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
See
the footnote references on page 49. |
46
Operating Highlights (continued)
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
Ethanol production (thousand gallons per day) |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
Gross margin per gallon of ethanol production |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
Operating costs per gallon of ethanol production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol operating expenses |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per gallon
of ethanol production |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
the footnote references on page 49. |
47
Refining Operating Highlights by Region (f)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
(201 |
) |
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
6.08 |
|
|
$ |
7.13 |
|
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.44 |
|
|
$ |
4.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
6.18 |
|
|
$ |
5.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Continent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
(184 |
) |
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
5.34 |
|
|
$ |
9.98 |
|
|
$ |
(4.64 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.07 |
|
|
$ |
3.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
5.67 |
|
|
$ |
5.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
(165 |
) |
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
5.80 |
|
|
$ |
9.76 |
|
|
$ |
(3.96 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.27 |
|
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
5.74 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(31 |
) |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
(216 |
) |
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
5.20 |
|
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
|
$ |
(9.20 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.97 |
|
|
$ |
5.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
$ |
6.93 |
|
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) for regions above |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
$ |
(766 |
) |
Asset impairment loss applicable to refining (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refining operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
(744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
the footnote references on page 49. |
48
Average Market Reference Prices and Differentials (g)
(dollars per barrel, except as noted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedstocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil |
|
$ |
78.67 |
|
|
$ |
42.97 |
|
|
$ |
35.70 |
|
WTI less sour crude oil at U.S. Gulf Coast (h) |
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
1.71 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
WTI less Mars crude oil |
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
|
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
3.72 |
|
WTI less Maya crude oil |
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Gulf Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
7.13 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
|
|
(1.01 |
) |
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
|
|
5.67 |
|
|
|
10.85 |
|
|
|
(5.18 |
) |
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
|
|
7.49 |
|
|
|
12.61 |
|
|
|
(5.12 |
) |
Propylene less WTI |
|
|
17.61 |
|
|
|
(6.49 |
) |
|
|
24.10 |
|
U.S. Mid-Continent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
|
(1.87 |
) |
Low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
11.64 |
|
|
|
(4.94 |
) |
U.S. Northeast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
7.88 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
|
|
6.88 |
|
|
|
13.43 |
|
|
|
(6.55 |
) |
Lube oils less WTI |
|
|
34.32 |
|
|
|
67.10 |
|
|
|
(32.78 |
) |
U.S. West Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARBOB 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
10.58 |
|
|
|
19.13 |
|
|
|
(8.55 |
) |
CARB diesel less WTI |
|
|
8.43 |
|
|
|
13.70 |
|
|
|
(5.27 |
) |
New York Harbor corn crush (dollars per gallon) |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
The
following notes relate to references on pages 45 through 49. |
|
(a) |
|
The information presented for the three months ended March 31, 2010 includes the operations
related to the acquisition of seven ethanol plants from VeraSun Energy Corporation in the
second quarter of 2009 including plants located Albert City,
Charles City, Fort Dodge, and
Hartley, Iowa; Aurora, South Dakota; Welcome, Minnesota; and Albion, Nebraska. In addition,
information presented for the three months ended March 31, 2010 includes operations related to
two ethanol plants purchased on January 13, 2010 from ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC located in
Bloomingburg, Ohio and Linden, Illinois and one ethanol plant purchased on February 4, 2010
from Renew Energy LLC located in Jefferson, Wisconsin. The ethanol production volumes
reflected for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are based on total production divided by
90 calendar days. |
|
(b) |
|
Due to the permanent shutdown of our refinery in Delaware City, Delaware during the fourth
quarter of 2009, the results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery for both periods
presented, as well as costs associated with the shutdown, are reflected as discontinued
operations. All refining operating highlights, both consolidated and for the Northeast
Region, exclude the Delaware City Refinery for both periods. |
|
(c) |
|
The asset impairment loss for the three months ended March 31, 2009 relates primarily to the
permanent cancellation of certain capital projects classified as construction in progress as
a result of the unfavorable impact of the economic slowdown on refining industry fundamentals.
Losses resulting from the permanent cancellation of certain capital projects in 2009 have
been reclassified from operating expenses and presented separately for comparability with the
2010 presentation. The asset impairment loss amounts are included in the refining segment
operating income but are excluded from the regional operating income amounts and the
consolidated and regional operating costs per barrel, resulting in an adjustment to the
operating costs per barrel previously reported in 2009. |
|
(d) |
|
Throughput margin per barrel represents operating revenues less cost of sales divided by
throughput volumes. |
|
(e) |
|
Other products primarily include gas oils, No. 6 fuel oil, petroleum coke, and asphalt. |
|
(f) |
|
The regions reflected herein contain the following refineries: the Gulf Coast refining region
includes the Corpus Christi East, Corpus Christi West, Texas City, Houston, Three Rivers,
St. Charles, Aruba, and Port Arthur Refineries; the Mid-Continent refining region includes the
McKee, Ardmore, and Memphis Refineries; the Northeast refining region includes the Quebec City
and Paulsboro Refineries; and the West Coast refining region includes the Benicia and
Wilmington Refineries. |
49
|
|
|
(g) |
|
The average market reference prices and differentials are based on posted prices from various
pricing services. The average market reference prices and differentials are presented to
provide users of the consolidated financial statements with economic indicators that
significantly affect our operations and profitability. |
|
(h) |
|
The market reference differential for sour crude oil is based on 50% Arab Medium and 50% Arab
Light posted prices. |
General
Operating revenues increased 47% (or $6 billion) for the first quarter of 2010 compared to the
first quarter of 2009 primarily as a result of higher refined product prices between the two
periods. Operating income declined $625 million and income from continuing operations declined
$465 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to amounts in the first quarter of
2009 primarily due to a $744 million decrease in refining segment operating income discussed below.
Refining
Results from operations of our refining segment decreased from operating income of $693 million for
the first quarter of 2009 to an operating loss of $51 million for the first quarter of 2010
resulting from a 35% decrease in throughput margin per barrel
($3.08 per barrel) and an 11% decline in throughput volumes (254,000 barrels per day).
The decrease in the refining throughput margin per barrel for the first quarter of 2010 was primarily due to a significant decrease in gasoline and distillate margins in all of our refining regions. Changes in the margin that we receive for our products have a material impact on our results of operations. For example, the benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast No. 2 fuel oil, which is a type of distillate, was $5.67 per barrel for the first quarter of 2010, compared to $10.85 per barrel for the first quarter of 2009, representing a decrease of $5.18 per barrel. Similar decreases in distillate margins were experienced in other regions. We estimate that the decrease in margin for distillates had a $400 million negative impact to our overall refining margin, quarter versus quarter, as we produced 659,000 barrels per day of distillates during the first quarter of 2010.
Similarly,
the benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast Conventional 87
gasoline was $7.13 per barrel for the first quarter of 2010, compared
to $8.14 per barrel
for the first quarter of 2009, representing a decrease of $1.01 per barrel.
Conventional 87 gasoline benchmark reference margins decreased
quarter versus quarter to an even greater extent in the Mid-Continent region ($1.87 per barrel decrease) and West Coast region ($8.55 per barrel decrease). We estimate that the decrease in gasoline margins had a $180 million negative impact to our overall refining margin, quarter versus quarter, as we produced 1.03 million barrels per day of gasoline during the first quarter of 2010.
Gasoline and distillate margins were lower in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the first
quarter of 2009 despite an increase in gasoline and distillate prices in the first quarter of 2010.
The decrease in the margin for these products resulted from gasoline and distillate prices
increasing at a slower rate than the increase in the price of crude oil. We
believe that the increase in the prices of these and other refined products was constrained as
compared to the increase in the price of crude oil due to weak demand caused by the economic
slowdown and overall customer sensitivity to the absolute prices of these products.
The decrease in throughput volumes during 2010 compared to 2009 was due primarily to the
temporary shutdown of our Aruba Refinery commencing in July 2009.
50
Retail
Retail operating income was $71 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to
$56 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. This 27% increase was primarily due to improved
retail fuel margins combined with lower selling expenses in our U.S. retail operations, partially
offset by increased selling expenses in our Canadian retail operations attributable largely to a
decrease in the Canadian dollar exchange rate relative to the U.S. dollar.
Ethanol
Ethanol operating income was $57 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, which
represents the operations of the seven ethanol plants acquired in the VeraSun Acquisition in the
second quarter of 2009 and the three ethanol plants acquired in the ASA and Renew acquisitions in
the first quarter of 2010, as described in Note 3 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Corporate Expenses and Other
General and administrative expenses decreased $48 million from the first quarter of 2009 to the
first quarter of 2010 due mainly to a $40 million insurance agreement related to certain
litigation, as described in Note 15 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other income (expense), net for the first quarter of 2010 increased from the first quarter of
2009 primarily due to an increase in the market value of assets held by certain of our nonqualified
defined benefit and defined contribution plans. These plan assets consist
primarily of publicly traded securities.
Interest and debt expense increased from the first quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of 2010 due
mainly to interest incurred on $1.0 billion of debt issued in March 2009 and $1.25 billion of debt
issued in February 2010, as described in Note 7 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Income tax expense decreased $195 million from the first quarter of 2009 to the first quarter of
2010 mainly as a result of lower operating income, partially offset by a $16 million charge in the
first quarter of 2010 related to the non-deductibility of certain retiree prescription health care
costs beginning in 2013 in connection with provisions of the recently passed health care reform
legislation.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$982 million compared to $781 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in
cash generated from operating activities was primarily due to the receipt of a $923 million tax
refund in March 2010. Changes in cash provided by or used for working capital during the first
three months of 2010 and 2009 are shown in Note 10 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The net cash generated from operating activities during the first three months of 2010, combined
with $1.24 billion of proceeds from the issuance of $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February
2015 and $850 million of 6.125% notes due in February 2020 as discussed in Note 7 of Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, were used mainly to:
|
|
|
fund $611 million of capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs; |
|
|
|
|
pay common stock dividends of $28 million; |
|
|
|
|
redeem our 7.50% senior notes for $294 million; |
51
|
|
|
|
purchase additional ethanol facilities for $260 million; and |
|
|
|
|
increase available cash on hand by $1.1 billion. |
The net cash generated from operating activities during the first three months of 2009, combined
with $998 million of proceeds from the issuance of $1 billion of notes in March 2009 as discussed
in Note 7 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, were used mainly to:
|
|
|
fund $902 million of capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs; |
|
|
|
|
pay common stock dividends of $77 million; |
|
|
|
|
make a $13 million advance payment for the purchase of certain VeraSun ethanol plants;
and |
|
|
|
|
increase available cash on hand by $775 million. |
Cash flows related to the discontinued operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been combined
with the cash flows from continuing operations within each category in the consolidated statements
of cash flows for both periods presented and are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Month Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Capital Investments
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we expended $382 million for capital expenditures and
$229 million for deferred turnaround and catalyst costs. Capital expenditures for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 included $173 million of costs related to environmental projects.
For 2010, we expect to incur approximately $2.0 billion for capital investments, including
approximately $1.5 billion for capital expenditures (approximately $800 million of which is for
environmental projects) and approximately $500 million for deferred turnaround and catalyst costs.
The capital expenditure estimate excludes expenditures related to strategic acquisitions. We
continuously evaluate our capital budget and make changes as economic conditions warrant.
In January 2010, we acquired two ethanol plants and inventories from ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC for
a total purchase price of $202 million. The plants are located in Linden, Indiana and
Bloomingburg, Ohio. In February 2010, we acquired an additional ethanol plant located near
Jefferson, Wisconsin from Renew Energy LLC plus certain receivables and inventories for a total
purchase price of $79 million. Of the $281 million total purchase price paid for these
acquisitions, $21 million was paid in the fourth quarter of 2009.
On April 7, 2010, we entered into an agreement to sell the shutdown Delaware City Refinery assets
and associated terminal and pipeline assets to wholly owned subsidiaries of PBF Energy Partners LP
for $220 million in proceeds. The transaction is expected to close during the second quarter of 2010, subject
to regulatory approvals, as well as finalization of certain agreements with the state of Delaware.
Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2010, our contractual obligations included debt, capital lease obligations,
operating leases, purchase obligations, and other long-term liabilities.
In February 2010, we issued $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February 2015 and $850 million of
6.125% notes due in February 2020. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled approximately
$1.24 billion, before deducting underwriting discounts of $8 million.
52
On March 15, 2010, we redeemed our 7.50% senior notes with a maturity date of June 15, 2015 for
$294 million, or 102.5% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $296 million as of
the
redemption date, resulting in a $2 million gain that was included in other income (expense), net
in the consolidated statement of income.
In March 2010, we called for redemption our 6.75% senior notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2014
for $190 million, or 102.25% of stated value. The redemption date was May 3, 2010. These notes
had a carrying amount of $187 million as of the redemption date, resulting in a loss on the
redemption of approximately $3 million.
We have an accounts receivable sales facility with a group of third-party entities and financial
institutions to sell on a revolving basis up to $1 billion of eligible trade receivables, which
matures in June 2010. As of March 31, 2010, the amount of eligible receivables sold to the
third-party entities and financial institutions was $200 million. We anticipate that we will be
able to renew this facility prior to its expiration in June 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we had no material changes outside the ordinary
course of our business in capital lease obligations, operating leases, purchase obligations, or
other long-term liabilities.
Our agreements do not have rating agency triggers that would automatically require us to post
additional collateral. However, in the event of certain downgrades of our senior unsecured debt to
below investment grade ratings by Moodys Investors Service and Standard & Poors Ratings Services,
the cost of borrowings under some of our bank credit facilities and other arrangements would
increase. As of March 31, 2010, all of our ratings on our senior unsecured debt are at or above
investment grade level as follows:
|
|
|
Rating Agency |
|
Rating |
|
|
|
Standard & Poors Ratings Services
|
|
BBB (negative outlook) |
Moodys Investors Service
|
|
Baa2 (negative outlook) |
Fitch Ratings
|
|
BBB (negative outlook) |
The rating agencies have placed a negative outlook on the ratings, which we believe is a result of
the weak refining margin environment and general economic slowdown. We cannot provide assurance
that these ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these
ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. We note that these credit
ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold our securities and may be revised or
withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any
other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of our credit ratings could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to obtain short- and long-term financing and the cost of
such financings.
53
Other Commercial Commitments
As of March 31, 2010, our committed lines of credit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing |
|
|
|
|
Capacity |
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of credit facility
|
|
$300 million
|
|
June 2010 |
Revolving
credit facility (Revolver)
|
|
$2.4 billion
|
|
November 2012 |
Canadian revolving credit facility
|
|
Cdn. $115 million
|
|
December 2012 |
The Revolver has certain restrictive covenants, including a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60%.
As of March 31, 2010, our debt-to-capitalization ratio, calculated in accordance with the terms of the
Revolver, was 30.6%. We believe that we will remain in compliance with this covenant.
As of March 31, 2010, we had $242 million of letters of credit outstanding under our uncommitted
short-term bank credit facilities and $329 million of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S.
committed credit facilities. Under our Canadian committed revolving credit facility, we had
Cdn. $22 million of letters of credit outstanding as of March 31, 2010. Our letters of credit
expire during 2010 and 2011. We anticipate that we will be able to renew the letter of credit
facility that will expire in June 2010.
Stock Purchase Programs
As of March 31, 2010, we have approvals under common stock purchase programs previously approved by
our board of directors to purchase approximately $3.5 billion of our common stock.
Tax Matters
As discussed in Note 15 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we are subject to
extensive tax liabilities. New tax laws and regulations and changes in existing tax laws and
regulations are continuously being enacted or proposed that could result in increased expenditures
for tax liabilities in the future. Many of these liabilities are subject to periodic audits by the
respective taxing authority. Subsequent changes to our tax liabilities as a result of these audits
may subject us to interest and penalties.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Government of Aruba (GOA) enacted a turnover tax on revenues from
the sale of goods produced and services rendered in Aruba. The turnover tax, which initially was
3% for on-island sales and services (but has subsequently been reduced to 1.5%) and 1% on export
sales, is being assessed by the GOA on sales by our Aruba Refinery. We disputed the GOAs
assessment of the turnover tax in arbitration proceedings with the Netherlands Arbitration
Institute (NAI) pursuant to which we sought to enforce our rights under a tax holiday agreement
related to the refinery and other agreements. The arbitration hearing was held on February 3-4,
2009. We also filed protests of these assessments through proceedings in Aruba.
In April 2008, we entered into an escrow agreement with the GOA and Caribbean Mercantile Bank NV
(CMB), pursuant to which we agreed to deposit an amount equal to the disputed turnover tax on
exports into an escrow account with CMB, pending resolution of the tax protest proceedings in
Aruba. Under this escrow agreement, we are required to continue to deposit an amount equal to the
disputed tax on a monthly basis until the tax dispute is resolved through the Aruba proceedings.
On April 20, 2009, we were notified that the Aruban tax court overruled our protests with respect
to the turnover tax assessed in January and February 2007, totaling $8 million. Under the escrow
agreement, we expensed and paid $8 million, plus $1 million of interest, to the GOA in the second
quarter of 2009. Amounts deposited under the escrow agreement, which totaled $115 million as of
both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, are reflected as restricted cash in our
consolidated balance sheets. In addition to the turnover tax described above, the GOA has asserted
other tax amounts including approximately
54
$35 million related to various dividends. We also
challenged approximately $35 million in foreign exchange payments made to the Central Bank of Aruba
as payments exempted under our tax holiday, as well as other reasons. Both the dividend tax and
the foreign exchange payment matters were also addressed in the arbitration proceedings discussed
above.
On November 3, 2009, we received an interim First Partial Award from the NAI arbitral panel. The
panels ruling validated our tax holiday agreement, but the panel also ruled in favor of the GOA on
our dispute of the $35 million in foreign exchange payments previously made to the Central Bank of
Aruba. The panels decision did not, however, fully resolve the remaining two items in the
arbitration, the applicable dividend tax rate and the turnover tax. With respect to the dividend
tax, the panel ruled that the dividend tax was not a profit tax covered by the tax holiday
agreement, but the panel did not address the fact that Aruban companies with tax holidays are
subject to a 0% dividend withholding rate rather than the 5% rate alleged by the GOA. With respect
to the turnover tax, the panel did reject our contractual claims but it decided that our
non-contractual claims against the turnover tax merited further discussion with and review by the
panel before a final decision could be rendered. Prior to this interim decision, no expense or
liability had been recognized in our consolidated financial statements with respect to unfunded
amounts. In light of the uncertain timing of any final resolution of these claims as a result of
the First Partial Award from the panel, we recorded a loss contingency accrual of approximately
$140 million, including interest, with respect to both the dividend and turnover taxes.
Following the November ruling, we entered into settlement discussions with the GOA. On
February 24, 2010, we signed a settlement agreement that details the parties proposed terms for
settlement of these disputes and provides a framework for taxation of our operations in Aruba on a
go-forward basis as our tax holiday was set to expire on December 31, 2010. Under the proposed
settlement, we will make a payment to the GOA of $118 million in consideration of a full release of
all tax claims prior to the effective date of the settlement, including the turnover tax disputed
in the Netherlands Arbitration. The GOA will eliminate the turnover tax on exports as of the
effective date of the settlement. In addition, we will agree to exit the tax holiday regime
following the effective date of the settlement agreement and will enter into a new tax regime under
which we will be subject to a net profit tax of less than 10% on an overall basis. Beginning on
the second anniversary of the settlement agreements effective date, we will also begin to make an
annual prepayment of taxes of $10 million, with the ability to carry forward any excess tax
prepayments to future tax years. The proposed settlement will not be effective until the
settlement agreement is approved by the Aruban Parliament and certain laws and regulations are
modified and/or established to provide for the terms of the settlement. The parties anticipate
that this will occur on or before June 1, 2010. If the settlement is not effective as of June 1,
2010, we both have the right to terminate the settlement agreement and return to arbitration and
the on-island proceedings to continue litigation.
Other Matters Impacting Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we contributed $50 million to our qualified pension
plans. No additional contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2010.
In April 2010, Somali pirates hijacked a South Korean supertanker off the East African coast with a cargo
of crude oil that we took title to in March upon loading into the vessel, and the vessel and its cargo
are currently in the possession of the Somali pirates. We paid our crude oil supplier for
the cargo in April. We believe that we will regain possession of the cargo, and we do not
anticipate this matter will have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity.
We are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, including
those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, pollution
prevention measures, greenhouse gas emissions, and characteristics and composition of gasolines and
distillates.
55
Because environmental laws and regulations are becoming more complex and stringent
and new environmental laws and regulations are continuously being enacted or proposed, the level of
future expenditures required for environmental matters could increase in the future. In addition,
any major
upgrades in any of our refineries could require material additional expenditures to comply with
environmental laws and regulations.
We believe that we have sufficient funds from operations and, to the extent necessary, from
borrowings under our credit facilities, to fund our ongoing operating requirements. We expect
that, to the extent necessary, we can raise additional funds from time to time through equity or
debt financings in the public and private capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit
facilities. However, there can be no assurances regarding the availability of any future
financings or additional credit facilities or whether such financings or additional credit
facilities can be made available on terms that are acceptable to us.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
As discussed in Note 2 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, certain new
financial accounting pronouncements have been issued that either have already been reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements, or will become effective for our financial
statements at various dates in the future.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of commodities, interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we enter into derivative instruments to manage those
risks. We also enter into derivative instruments to manage the price risk on other contractual
derivatives into which we have entered. The only types of derivative
instruments we enter into are those related to the various commodities we purchase or produce, interest rate swaps, and foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts as described below.
All derivative instruments are recorded on our balance
sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair values.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
We are exposed to market risks related to the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily
gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), and natural gas used in our refining operations.
To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we use
commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options. We use the futures
markets for the available liquidity, which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging
and trading operations. We use swaps primarily to convert our floating price exposure to a fixed
price. Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily
basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has
been approved by our board of directors.
For risk management purposes, we use fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, and economic hedges. In
addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk, we also enter into
certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes. Our objective for entering into
each type of hedge or trading activity is described below.
56
Fair
Value Hedges Fair value hedges are used to hedge certain inventories and firm
commitments to purchase inventories. The level of activity for our fair value hedges is based
on the level of our operating inventories, and generally represents the amount by which our
inventories differ from our previous year-end LIFO inventory levels.
Cash
Flow Hedges Cash flow hedges are used to hedge certain forecasted feedstock and
product purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas purchases. The objective of our
cash flow hedges is to lock in the price of forecasted feedstock, product, or natural gas
purchases or refined product sales at existing market prices that are deemed favorable by
management.
Economic
Hedges Economic hedges are hedges not designated as fair value or cash flow
hedges that are used to (i) manage price volatility in certain refinery feedstock, refined
product, and corn inventories, and (ii) manage price volatility in certain forecasted
refinery feedstock, product, and corn purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas
purchases. Our objective in entering into economic hedges is consistent with the objectives
discussed above for fair value hedges and cash flow hedges. However, the economic hedges are
not designated as a fair value hedge or cash flow hedge for accounting purposes, usually due
to the difficulty of establishing the required documentation at the date that the derivative
instrument is entered into that would allow us to achieve hedge deferral accounting.
Trading
Activities Derivatives entered into for trading activities represent commodity
derivative instruments held or issued for trading purposes. Our objective in entering into
commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes is to take advantage of existing market
conditions related to crude oil and refined products that management perceives as
opportunities to benefit our results of operations and cash flows, but for which there are no
related physical transactions.
The following tables include all positions at the end of the reporting period with which we have
market risk. Notional contract volumes are presented in thousands of barrels (for crude oil and refined
products), in billions of British thermal units (for natural gas), or in thousands of bushels (for
corn). The weighted-average pay and receive prices represent amounts per barrel (for crude oil
and refined products), amounts per million British thermal units (for natural gas), or amounts per
bushel (for corn). Volumes shown for swaps represent notional volumes, which are used to
calculate amounts due under the agreements. For futures, the contract value represents the
contract price of either the long or short position multiplied by the derivative notional contract volume,
while the market value amount represents the period-end market price of the commodity being hedged
multiplied by the derivative contract volume. The pre-tax fair value for futures, swaps, and
options represents the fair value of the derivative contract. The pre-tax fair value for swaps
represents the excess of the receive price over the pay price multiplied by the notional contract
volumes. For futures and options, the pre-tax fair value represents (i) the excess of the market
value amount over the contract amount for long positions, or (ii) the excess of the contract amount
over the market value amount for short positions. Additionally, for futures and options, the
weighted-average pay price represents the contract price for long positions and the
weighted-average receive price represents the contract price for short positions. The
weighted-average pay price and weighted-average receive price for options represents their strike
price. The contract values, market values, and pre-tax fair values
are stated in millions of dollars.
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Contract |
|
Pay |
|
Receive |
|
Contract |
|
Market |
|
Fair |
|
|
Volumes |
|
Price |
|
Price |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
12,036 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
82.40 |
|
|
$ |
992 |
|
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
11,925 |
|
|
$ |
60.67 |
|
|
|
84.96 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
20,025 |
|
|
|
80.86 |
|
|
|
94.38 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
11,925 |
|
|
|
84.96 |
|
|
|
76.81 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
20,025 |
|
|
|
94.38 |
|
|
|
77.72 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
82.17 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
82,679 |
|
|
|
80.87 |
|
|
|
84.66 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
39,621 |
|
|
|
84.16 |
|
|
|
94.30 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
79.80 |
|
|
|
92.12 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
84.43 |
|
|
|
86.07 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
88.76 |
|
|
|
97.77 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
84.26 |
|
|
|
93.64 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
63,691 |
|
|
|
84.68 |
|
|
|
75.50 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
(585 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
54,114 |
|
|
|
94.58 |
|
|
|
89.20 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
11,475 |
|
|
|
92.62 |
|
|
|
99.35 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
48,600 |
|
|
|
86.06 |
|
|
|
80.46 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
97.77 |
|
|
|
108.16 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
93.64 |
|
|
|
101.69 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
150,251 |
|
|
|
78.12 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
11,737 |
|
|
|
12,656 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
63,635 |
|
|
|
84.74 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
5,392 |
|
|
|
6,037 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
26,501 |
|
|
|
93.82 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
|
2,559 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
2010 (corn) |
|
|
6,070 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
91.19 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (corn) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
142,324 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
77.11 |
|
|
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
12,002 |
|
|
|
(1,028 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
52,155 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
83.64 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
45,238 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
94.24 |
|
|
|
4,263 |
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
2010 (corn) |
|
|
25,255 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
2011 (corn) |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
80.75 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Contract |
|
Pay |
|
Receive |
|
Contract |
|
Market |
|
Fair |
|
|
Volumes |
|
Price |
|
Price |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
13,188 |
|
|
$ |
73.30 |
|
|
$ |
84.85 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,853 |
|
|
|
80.95 |
|
|
|
93.95 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
9,330 |
|
|
|
72.27 |
|
|
|
93.00 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
79.30 |
|
|
|
86.00 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
96.86 |
|
|
|
98.71 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
80.80 |
|
|
|
93.99 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
12,930 |
|
|
|
84.85 |
|
|
|
72.38 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,886 |
|
|
|
94.05 |
|
|
|
81.28 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
9,555 |
|
|
|
92.95 |
|
|
|
77.65 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
85.98 |
|
|
|
84.10 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
98.55 |
|
|
|
94.95 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
93.99 |
|
|
|
79.62 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
20,561 |
|
|
|
80.51 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,734 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,179 |
|
|
|
89.17 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
7,454 |
|
|
|
91.85 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
2010 (natural gas) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
84.45 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
95.91 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
22,334 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
80.45 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,883 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
19,121 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
89.19 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
1,773 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
7,307 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
91.60 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
2010 (natural gas) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4.10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
84.40 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
99.04 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
64.39 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Options short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
53.38 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Contract |
|
Pay |
|
Receive |
|
Contract |
|
Market |
|
Fair |
|
|
Volumes |
|
Price |
|
Price |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
75.65 |
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
$ |
60.46 |
|
|
|
82.29 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
26,700 |
|
|
|
79.80 |
|
|
|
91.59 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
15,900 |
|
|
|
82.29 |
|
|
|
75.51 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
26,700 |
|
|
|
91.59 |
|
|
|
77.60 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
111,354 |
|
|
|
78.92 |
|
|
|
81.18 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
53,316 |
|
|
|
83.56 |
|
|
|
91.34 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
79.33 |
|
|
|
88.26 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
36,850 |
|
|
|
85.09 |
|
|
|
85.75 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
88.76 |
|
|
|
96.54 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
84.26 |
|
|
|
92.60 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
93,177 |
|
|
|
81.79 |
|
|
|
74.46 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(683 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
70,488 |
|
|
|
91.70 |
|
|
|
88.90 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
88.26 |
|
|
|
102.59 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
36,850 |
|
|
|
85.73 |
|
|
|
79.89 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
96.54 |
|
|
|
108.16 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,950 |
|
|
|
92.60 |
|
|
|
101.69 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
118,841 |
|
|
|
73.98 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
8,792 |
|
|
|
9,598 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
80,041 |
|
|
|
83.58 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6,690 |
|
|
|
7,376 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
85.24 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
2010 (corn) |
|
|
7,155 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2011 (corn) |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
130,676 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
74.68 |
|
|
|
9,759 |
|
|
|
10,603 |
|
|
|
(844 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
60,958 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
82.08 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
5,611 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
7,932 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
85.50 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
2010 (corn) |
|
|
23,250 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
2011 (corn) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
42.50 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
39.88 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
42.50 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Notional |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
Wtd Avg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Contract |
|
Pay |
|
Receive |
|
Contract |
|
Market |
|
Fair |
|
|
Volumes |
|
Price |
|
Price |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
16,134 |
|
|
$ |
72.43 |
|
|
$ |
82.27 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
23,718 |
|
|
|
79.88 |
|
|
|
91.01 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
72.19 |
|
|
|
89.06 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
77.45 |
|
|
|
85.45 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
80.80 |
|
|
|
92.84 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Swaps short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
16,191 |
|
|
|
82.26 |
|
|
|
72.30 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
23,796 |
|
|
|
91.26 |
|
|
|
80.34 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
89.15 |
|
|
|
76.58 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
2011 (crude oil) |
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
85.45 |
|
|
|
83.25 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
2011 (gasoline) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
92.84 |
|
|
|
79.62 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
Futures long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
17,544 |
|
|
|
77.38 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
18,285 |
|
|
|
87.75 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
86.50 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
2010 (natural gas) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
95.91 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Futures short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
17,464 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
77.18 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
2010 (distillate) |
|
|
18,269 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
87.74 |
|
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
2010 (gasoline) |
|
|
4,431 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
85.73 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
2010 (natural gas) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 (distillate) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
95.91 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options long: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
45.00 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options short: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (crude oil) |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
41.67 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
INTEREST RATE RISK
The following table provides information about our debt instruments (dollars in millions), the fair
value of which is sensitive to changes in interest rates. Principal cash flows and related
weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates are presented. We had no interest rate
derivative instruments outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
Expected Maturity Dates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
after |
|
Total |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
6,089 |
|
|
$ |
8,183 |
|
|
$ |
9,129 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Floating rate |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Expected Maturity Dates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
after |
|
Total |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
5,126 |
|
|
$ |
7,220 |
|
|
$ |
8,028 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Floating rate |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
As of March 31, 2010, we had commitments to purchase $189 million of U.S. dollars. Our market risk
was minimal on these contracts, as they matured on or before April 16, 2010, resulting in a
$1 million loss in the second quarter of 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) |
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. |
|
|
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the
period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of March 31, 2010. |
|
(b) |
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |
62
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information below describes new proceedings or material developments in proceedings that we
previously reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Litigation
For the legal proceedings listed below, we hereby incorporate by reference into this Item our
disclosures made in Part I, Item 1 of this Report included in Note 15 of Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption Litigation.
|
|
|
MTBE Litigation |
|
|
|
|
Retail Fuel Temperature Litigation |
|
|
|
|
Rosolowski |
|
|
|
|
Other Litigation |
Environmental Enforcement Matters
While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the following environmental proceedings, if any
one or more of them were decided against us, we believe that there would be no material effect on
our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We are reporting these proceedings
to comply with SEC regulations, which require us to disclose certain information about proceedings
arising under federal, state, or local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment or protecting the environment if we reasonably believe that such proceedings will
result in monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) (Paulsboro Refinery). The NJDEP has
issued four Administrative Order and Notice of Civil Administrative Penalty Assessments (Notices)
to our Paulsboro Refinery since December 2009 relating to alleged excess air emissions and
deviations reported for CCR catalyst samples and FCC scrubber monitoring. The Notices assess
penalties of $210,200 in the aggregate. We have commenced discussions with the NJDEP to resolve
these matters
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) (Wilmington Refinery). In our Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2009, we reported that we had 29 notices of violation (NOVs) issued by
the SCAQMD from 2008 to 2009 for various alleged air regulation and air permit violations at our
Wilmington Refinery and asphalt plant. In the first quarter of 2010, we completed the settlement
of all of these NOVs with the SCAQMD.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) (McKee Refinery). In our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009, we reported that our McKee Refinery had received an agreed order from the
TCEQ for a number of self-reported Title V permit deviations that occurred in 2008 and several
emission events that occurred in 2009. We settled this matter with the TCEQ in April 2010.
TCEQ (Port Arthur Refinery). In our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, we reported
that our Port Arthur Refinery had received a proposed agreed order from the TCEQ relating to
alleged multiple emissions events in 2008 and early 2009. In the first quarter of 2010, we settled
this matter with the TCEQ.
63
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Risk Factors section
of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. Not applicable.
(b) Use of Proceeds. Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. The following table discloses purchases of shares
of our common stock made by us or on our behalf for the periods shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares Not |
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid per |
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
Value) of Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
of Publicly |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Programs (1) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(at month end) (2) |
|
|
January 2010 |
|
|
|
29,628 |
|
|
|
$ |
17.98 |
|
|
|
|
29,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.46 billion |
|
|
February 2010 |
|
|
|
17,015 |
|
|
|
$ |
18.60 |
|
|
|
|
17,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.46 billion |
|
|
March 2010 |
|
|
|
8,694 |
|
|
|
$ |
18.90 |
|
|
|
|
8,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.46 billion |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
55,337 |
|
|
|
$ |
18.31 |
|
|
|
|
55,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.46 billion |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the first
quarter of 2010 relating to (a) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions
to meet our obligations under employee benefit plans, and (b) our purchases of shares
from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of
stock options, the vesting of restricted stock, and other stock compensation
transactions in accordance with the terms of our incentive compensation plans. |
|
(2) |
|
On April 26, 2007, we publicly announced an increase in our common stock
purchase program from $2 billion to $6 billion, as authorized by our board of
directors on April 25, 2007. The $6 billion common stock purchase program has no
expiration date. On February 28, 2008, we announced that our board of directors
approved a $3 billion common stock purchase program, which is in addition to the
$6 billion program. This $3 billion program has no expiration date. |
64
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
*12.01
|
|
Statements of Computations of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed
Charges and Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
Stock Dividends. |
|
|
|
*31.01
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal executive officer. |
|
|
|
*31.02
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal financial officer. |
|
|
|
*32.01
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications (as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). |
|
|
|
**101
|
|
The following materials from Valero Energy Corporations Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, formatted in XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated
Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) Consolidated
Statements of Other Comprehensive Income, and (v) Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks
of text. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Submitted electronically herewith. |
In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL information in Exhibit 101 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or
other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as
shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
65
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Michael S. Ciskowski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael S. Ciskowski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Date: May 7, 2010
66