e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-14749
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Colorado
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
84-0910696
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
265 Turner Drive, Durango, CO 81303
(Address of principal executive offices)
(970) 259-0554
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(b) Of The Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock $.03 Par Value per Share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(g) Of The Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15 (d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§
229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On April 30, 2010, there were 6,030,938 shares of Common Stock outstanding. The aggregate market
value of the Common Stock (based on the closing price as quoted on the Nasdaq Market on August 31,
2009) held by non-affiliates was $27,831,397.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants proxy statement furnished to stockholders in connection with the 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the Proxy Statement) are incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Report. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within
120 days of the close of the registrants fiscal year.
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Founded in 1981 and incorporated in Colorado in 1982, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (the
Company, and sometimes referred to herein with the pronouns we, us, or our) is an
international franchisor and confectionery manufacturer. We are headquartered in Durango, Colorado
and manufacture an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. As
of March 31, 2010 there were 11 Company-owned, 29 franchisee/licensee owned and 305 franchised
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores operating in 36 states, Canada, and the United Arab
Emirates.
We believe approximately 55% of the products sold at Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores are
prepared on the premises. We believe this in-store preparation creates a special store ambiance and
the aroma and sight of products being made attracts foot traffic and assures customers that
products are fresh.
Our principal competitive strengths lie in our brand name recognition, our reputation for the
quality, variety and taste of our products; the special ambiance of our stores; our knowledge and
experience in applying criteria for selection of new store locations; our expertise in the
manufacture of chocolate candy products and the merchandising and marketing of chocolate and other
candy products; and the control and training infrastructures we have implemented to assure
consistent customer service and execution of successful practices and techniques at our stores.
We believe our manufacturing expertise and reputation for quality has facilitated the sale of
selected products through specialty markets. We are currently selling our products in a select
number of specialty markets including wholesaling, fundraising, corporate sales, mail order and
internet sales.
Our revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: (i) sales to franchisees and
others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by us (72-72-75%); (ii) sales at
Company-owned stores of chocolates and other confectionery products (including products
manufactured by us) (7-7-5%) and (iii) the collection of initial franchise fees and royalties from
franchisees (21-21-20%). Our revenues are derived from domestic (97-97-97%) and international
(3-3-3%) sources. The figures in parentheses show the percentage of total revenues attributable to
each source for fiscal years ended February 28 (29), 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
According to the National Confectioners Association, the total U.S. candy market approximated $29.3
billion of retail sales in 2009 with chocolate generating sales of approximately $16.9 billion.
According to the Department of Commerce, per capita consumption of chocolate in 2009 was
approximately 14 pounds per year nationally and increased 4% when compared to 2008.
Business Strategy
Our objective is to build on our position as a leading international franchisor and manufacturer of
high quality chocolate and other confectionery products. We continually seek opportunities to
profitably expand our business. To accomplish this objective, we employ a business strategy that
includes the following elements:
Product Quality and Variety
We maintain gourmet taste and quality of our chocolate candies by using only the finest chocolate
and other wholesome ingredients. We use our own proprietary recipes, primarily developed by our
master candy makers. A typical Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store offers up to 100 of our
chocolate candies throughout the year and as many as 200, including many packaged candies, during
the holiday seasons. Individual stores also offer numerous varieties of premium fudge and gourmet
caramel apples, as well as other products prepared in the store from Company recipes.
Store Atmosphere and Ambiance
We seek to establish an enjoyable and inviting atmosphere in each Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
store. Each store prepares numerous products, including fudge, barks and caramel apples, in the
store. In-store preparation is designed both to be fun and entertaining for customers and to convey
an image of freshness and homemade quality. Our design staff has developed easily replicable
designs and specifications to ensure that the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory concept is
consistently implemented throughout the system.
3
We have evaluated and updated our store design from our original Victorian store concept to a
more contemporary design, through our own testing and the input of a nationally recognized design
firm. The objective of store design is threefold: (1) increase average revenue per unit thereby
opening untapped real estate environments; (2) further emphasize the entertainment and freshness
value of our in-store confectionery factory; and (3) improve operational efficiency through optimal
store layout. Through March 31, 2010, 221 stores incorporating new designs are in operation.
Site Selection
Careful selection of a site is critical to the success of a Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store.
We consider many factors in identifying suitable sites, including tenant mix, visibility,
attractiveness, accessibility, level of foot traffic and occupancy costs. Final site selection
occurs only after our senior management has approved the site. We believe that the experience of
our management team in evaluating a potential site is one of our competitive strengths.
Customer Service Commitment
We emphasize excellence in customer service and seek to employ and to sell franchises to motivated
and energetic people. We also foster enthusiasm for our customer service philosophy and the Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory concept through our bi-annual franchisee convention, regional meetings
and other frequent contacts with our franchisees.
Increase Same Store Retail Sales at Existing Locations
We seek to increase profitability of our store system through increasing sales at existing store
locations. Changes in system wide domestic same store retail sales are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
(0.9 |
%) |
2009 |
|
|
(5.4 |
%) |
2010 |
|
|
(2.9 |
%) |
We believe that the negative trend in FY 2008, FY 2009 and FY 2010 was due to the global economic
recession that significantly impacted retailing, in general, and regional shopping mall customer
traffic, in particular, throughout the United States during all of 2008, 2009 and the first three
quarters of FY 2010 resulting in the worst economic and retail environment in our history. We
experienced a decrease in same store sales of (6.7%) in our fiscal first quarter of 2010 followed
by decreases in same store sales of (4.6%) and (3.2%) in our fiscal second and third quarters and
an increase of 1.4% in our fiscal fourth quarter of 2010 compared with the same periods in FY 2009.
We have designed a contemporary and coordinated line of packaged products that capture and convey
the freshness, fun and excitement of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory retail store experience.
We also believe that the successful launch of new packaging has had a positive impact on same store
sales.
Increase Same Store Pounds Purchased by Existing Locations
In FY 2010, same store pounds purchased by franchisees decreased 4.2% compared to the prior fiscal
year. We continue to add new products and focus our existing product lines in an effort to increase
same store pounds purchased by existing locations. We believe the decrease in same store pounds
purchased was due in part to a product mix shift from factory-made products to products made in the
store such as caramel apples and fudge and a decline in same store retail sales. We believe the
decline in same store pounds purchased over and above the decline related to decreased same store
sales is primarily a result of the United States recession and the resulting financial pressure the
recession has created for our system of franchise owned stores.
Enhanced Operating Efficiencies
We seek to improve our profitability by controlling costs and increasing the efficiency of our
operations. Efforts in the last several years include: the purchase of additional automated factory
equipment, implementation of a comprehensive Advanced Planning and Scheduling (APS) system,
implementation of alternative manufacturing strategies and installation of enhanced Point-of-Sale
(POS) systems in all of our Company-owned and 172 of our franchised stores through March 31, 2010.
These measures have significantly improved our ability to deliver our products to our stores
safely, quickly and cost-effectively and impact store operations. Additionally, the divestiture of
substantially all of the Company-owned stores in FY 2002 has reduced our exposure to real estate
risk, improved our operating margins and allowed us to increase our focus on franchising.
4
Expansion Strategy
Key elements of our expansion strategy include:
Unit Growth
The cornerstone of our growth strategy is to aggressively pursue unit growth opportunities in
locations where we have traditionally been successful, to pursue new and developing real estate
environments for franchisees which appear promising based on early sales results, and to improve
and expand the retail store concept, such that previously untapped and unfeasible environments
(such as most regional centers) generate sufficient revenue to support a successful Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory location.
High Traffic Environments
We currently establish franchised stores in the following environments: outlet centers, tourist
environments, regional centers, street fronts, airports and other entertainment oriented
environments. Over the last several years, we have had a particular focus on regional center
locations. We are optimistic that our exciting store design will allow us to continue targeting the
over 1,400 regional centers in the United States. We have established a business relationship with
most of the major developers in the United States and believe that these relationships provide us
with the opportunity to take advantage of attractive sites in new and existing real estate
environments.
Name Recognition and New Market Penetration
We believe the visibility of our stores and the high foot traffic at many of our locations has
generated strong name recognition of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory and demand for our
franchises. The Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system has historically been concentrated in the
western and Rocky Mountain region of the United States, but recent growth has generated a gradual
easterly momentum as new stores have been opened in the eastern half of the country. This growth
has further increased our name recognition and demand for our franchises. Distribution of Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory products through specialty markets also increases name recognition and
brand awareness in areas of the country in which we have not previously had a significant presence.
We believe that by distributing selected Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory products through
specialty markets increases our name brand recognition and will improve and benefit our entire
store system.
Store Concept
We seek to establish a fun and inviting atmosphere in our Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store
locations. Unlike most other confectionery stores, each Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store
prepares certain products, including fudge and caramel apples, in the store. Customers can observe
store personnel making fudge from start to finish, including the mixing of ingredients in
old-fashioned copper kettles and the cooling of the fudge on large granite or marble tables, and
are often invited to sample the stores products. We believe that an average of approximately 55%
of the revenues of franchised stores is generated by sales of products prepared on the premises. We
believe the in-store preparation and aroma of our products enhance the ambiance at Rocky Mountain
Chocolate Factory stores, are fun and entertaining for our customers and convey an image of
freshness and homemade quality.
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores opened prior to FY 2002 have a distinctive country
Victorian decor, which further enhances their friendly and enjoyable atmosphere. Each store
includes finely crafted wood cabinetry, copper and brass accents, etched mirrors and large marble
tables on which fudge and other products are made. To ensure that all stores conform to the Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory image, our design staff provides working drawings and specifications and
approves the construction plans for each new store. We also control the signage and building
materials that may be used in the stores.
In FY 2002, we launched our revised store design concept intended specifically for high foot
traffic regional shopping centers. The revised store design concept is modern with crisp and clean
site lines and an even stronger emphasis on our unique upscale kitchen. We are requiring that all
new Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores incorporate the revised store design concept. We also
require that key elements of the revised store design concept be incorporated into existing store
design upon renewal of the Franchise Agreement, or transfer in store ownership.
The average store size is approximately 1,000 square feet, approximately 650 square feet of which
is selling space. Most stores are open seven days a week. Typical hours are 10 a.m. to 9 p.m.,
Monday through Saturday, and 12 noon to 6 p.m. on Sundays. Store hours in tourist areas may vary
depending upon the tourist season.
5
Co-branding Strategy
On January 26, 2007 we began testing co-branded locations with a variety of strategic partners.
Co-branding a location is a potential vehicle to possibly exploit retail environments that would
not typically support a stand alone Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store. Co-branding can also
be used to more efficiently manage rent structure, payroll and other operating costs in
environments that have not historically supported stand alone Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
stores. Our co-branded partners franchisees currently operate 29 locations.
We are still in the testing and evaluation stage of our co-branding strategy and believe that if
this strategy proves financially viable it could represent a significant future growth opportunity
for us.
Products and Packaging
We typically produce approximately 300 chocolate candies and other confectionery products, using
proprietary recipes developed primarily by our master candy makers. These products include many
varieties of clusters, caramels, creams, mints and truffles. We continue to engage in a major
effort to expand our product line by developing additional exciting and attractive new products.
During the Christmas, Easter and Valentines Day holiday seasons, we may make as many as 100
additional items, including many candies offered in packages specially designed for the holidays. A
typical Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store offers up to 100 of these candies throughout the
year and up to an additional 100 during holiday seasons. Individual stores also offer more than 15
premium fudges and other products prepared in the store. We believe that, on average, approximately
40% of the revenues of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores are generated by products
manufactured at our factory, 55% by products made in individual stores using our recipes and
ingredients purchased from us or approved suppliers and the remaining 5% by products, such as ice
cream, coffee and other sundries, purchased from approved suppliers.
We use only the finest chocolates, nut meats and other wholesome ingredients in our candies and
continually strive to offer new confectionery items in order to maintain the excitement and appeal
of its products. We develop special packaging for the Christmas, Valentines Day and Easter
holidays, and customers can have their purchases packaged in decorative boxes and fancy tins
throughout the year.
Chocolate candies that we manufacture are sold at prices ranging from $16.50 to $30.00 per pound,
with an average price of $19.43 per pound. Franchisees set their own retail prices, though we do
recommend prices for all of our products.
Operating Environment
We currently establish Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in six primary environments:
regional centers, tourist areas, outlet centers, street fronts, airports and other entertainment
oriented shopping centers. Each of these environments has a number of attractive features,
including high levels of foot traffic. Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory domestic franchise
locations in operation as of February 28, 2010 include:
|
|
|
|
|
Regional Centers |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
Outlet Centers |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Festival/Community Centers |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
Tourist Areas |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
Street Fronts |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
Airports |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Other |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Regional Centers
As of February 28, 2010, there were Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in approximately 71
regional centers, including a location in the Mall of America in Bloomington, Minnesota. Although
often providing favorable levels of foot traffic, regional centers typically involve more expensive
rent structures and competing food and beverage concepts. Our existing store concept is designed to
unlock the potential of the regional center environment.
Outlet Centers
We have established business relationships with most of the major outlet center developers in the
United States. Although not all factory outlet centers provide desirable locations for our stores,
management believes that our relationships with these developers will provide us with the
opportunity to take advantage of attractive sites in new and existing outlet centers.
6
Tourist Areas, Street Fronts and Other Entertainment Oriented Shopping Centers
As of February 28, 2010, there were approximately 40 Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in
locations considered to be tourist areas, including Fishermans Wharf in San Francisco, California
and the Riverwalk in San Antonio, Texas. Tourist areas are very attractive locations because they
offer high levels of foot traffic and favorable customer spending characteristics, and greatly
increase our visibility and name recognition. We believe significant opportunities exist to expand
into additional tourist areas with high levels of foot traffic.
Other Environments
We believe there are a number of other environments that have the characteristics necessary for the
successful operation of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores such as airports and sports arenas.
Thirteen franchised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores exist at airport locations: two at
Atlanta International (Hartsfield-Jackson), two at Denver International Airport, one at Charlotte
International Airport, two at Chicago OHare International Airport; one at Houston George Bush
Intercontinental Airport, one at Minneapolis International Airport, one at Salt Lake City
International Airport, one at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport; one at Edmonton
International Airport, and one at Toronto Pearson International Airport.
On July 20, 2007 we entered into an exclusive airport development agreement with The Grove, Inc.
Pursuant to this agreement, The Grove had the exclusive right to open Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory stores in all airports in the United States where there are no Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory stores currently operating or under development. Additionally, the agreement sets forth a
commission on the initial franchise fee and future royalty revenue to be paid by us to The Grove,
Inc. for any third-party, qualified, franchisees who develop an airport location under the
agreement. Six stores were opened under the agreement which expired on July 20, 2009.
Franchising Program
General
Our franchising philosophy is one of service and commitment to our franchise system, and we
continuously seek to improve our franchise support services. Our concept has consistently been
rated as an outstanding franchise opportunity by publications and organizations rating such
opportunities. In January 2010, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory was rated the number one franchise
opportunity in the candy category by Entrepreneur Magazine. As of March 31, 2010, there were 312
franchised stores in the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system.
Franchisee Sourcing and Selection
The majority of new franchises are awarded to persons referred by existing franchisees, to
interested consumers who have visited Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores and to existing
franchisees. We also advertise for new franchisees in national and regional newspapers as suitable
potential store locations come to our attention. Franchisees are approved by us on the basis of the
applicants net worth and liquidity, together with an assessment of work ethic and personality
compatibility with our operating philosophy.
In FY 1992, we entered into a franchise development agreement covering Canada with Immaculate
Confections, Ltd. of Vancouver, British Columbia. Pursuant to this agreement, Immaculate
Confections purchased the exclusive right to franchise and operate Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
stores in Canada. As of March 31, 2010, Immaculate Confections operated 48 stores under this
agreement.
In FY 2000, we entered into a franchise development agreement covering the Gulf Cooperation Council
States of United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Oman with Al Muhairy Group
of United Arab Emirates. Pursuant to this agreement, Al Muhairy Group purchased the exclusive
right to franchise and operate Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in the Gulf Cooperation
Council States. As of March 31, 2010, Al Muhairy Group operated 3 stores under this agreement.
On August 18, 2009 we entered into a definitive Master License Agreement with Kahala Franchise
Corp. Under the terms of the agreement, select current and future Cold Stone Creamery franchise
stores are anticipated to be co-branded with both the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory and the Cold
Stone Creamery brands. Locations developed or modified under the agreement are subject to the
approval of both parties. Locations developed or modified under the agreement will remain
franchisees of Cold Stone Creamery and will be licensed to offer the Rocky Mountain Chocolate
Factory brand. The agreement runs until the date upon which the last co-branded store ceases to be
open for business or unless earlier terminated by an event of
either partys default. As of March 31, 2010, Cold Stone Creamery franchisees operated 22
7
stores under this agreement. This Agreement is the License Agreement contemplated by the Test
License Agreement described on Form 8-K that we filed on April 21, 2009 and furnished as Exhibit
10.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009.
Training and Support
Each domestic franchisee owner/operator and each store manager for a domestic franchisee is
required to complete a 7-day comprehensive training program in store operations and management. We
have established a training center at our Durango headquarters in the form of a full-sized replica
of a properly configured and merchandised Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store. Topics covered in
the training course include our philosophy of store operation and management, customer service,
merchandising, pricing, cooking, inventory and cost control, quality standards, record keeping,
labor scheduling and personnel management. Training is based on standard operating policies and
procedures contained in an operations manual provided to all franchisees, which the franchisee is
required to follow by terms of the franchise agreement. Additionally, and importantly, trainees are
provided with a complete orientation to our operations by working in key factory operational areas
and by meeting with members of our senior management.
Our operating objectives include providing knowledge and expertise in merchandising, marketing and
customer service to all front-line store level employees to maximize their skills and ensure that
they are fully versed in our proven techniques.
We provide ongoing support to franchisees through our field consultants, who maintain regular and
frequent communication with the stores by phone and by site visits. The field consultants also
review and discuss with the franchisee, store operating results and provide advice and guidance in
improving store profitability and in developing and executing store marketing and merchandising
programs. We have developed a handbook containing a pre-packaged local store marketing plan,
which allows franchisees to implement cost-effective promotional programs that have proven
successful in other Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores.
Quality Standards and Control
The franchise agreement for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchisees requires compliance with
our procedures of operation and food quality specifications and permits audits and inspections by
us.
Operating standards for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores are set forth in operating manuals.
These manuals cover general operations, factory ordering, merchandising, advertising and accounting
procedures. Through their regular visits to franchised stores, our field consultants audit
performance and adherence to our standards. We have the right to terminate any franchise agreement
for non-compliance with our operating standards. Products sold at the stores and ingredients used
in the preparation of products approved for on-site preparation must be purchased from us or from
approved suppliers.
The Franchise Agreement: Terms and Conditions
The domestic offer and sale of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises is made pursuant to the
Franchise Disclosure Document prepared in accordance with federal and state laws and regulations.
States that regulate the sale and operation of franchises require a franchiser to register or file
certain notices with the state authorities prior to offering and selling franchises in those
states.
Under the current form of domestic Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchise agreement,
franchisees pay us (i) an initial franchise fee for each store, (ii) royalties based on monthly
gross sales, and (iii) a marketing fee based on monthly gross sales. Franchisees are generally
granted exclusive territory with respect to the operation of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
stores only in the immediate vicinity of their stores. Chocolate products not made on the premises
by franchisees must be purchased from us or approved suppliers. The franchise agreements require
franchisees to comply with our procedures of operation and food quality specifications, to permit
inspections and audits by us and to remodel stores to conform with standards then in effect. We may
terminate the franchise agreement upon the failure of the franchisee to comply with the conditions
of the agreement and upon the occurrence of certain events, such as insolvency or bankruptcy of the
franchisee or the commission by the franchisee of any unlawful or deceptive practice, which in our
judgment is likely to adversely affect the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system. Our ability to
terminate franchise agreements pursuant to such provisions is subject to applicable bankruptcy and
state laws and regulations. See Business Regulation.
The agreements prohibit the transfer or assignment of any interest in a franchise without our prior
written consent. The agreements also give us a right of first refusal to purchase any
8
interest in a franchise if a proposed transfer would result in a change of control of that
franchise. The refusal right, if exercised, would allow us to purchase the interest proposed to be
transferred under the same terms and conditions and for the same price as offered by the proposed
transferee.
The term of each Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchise agreement is ten years, and franchisees
have the right to renew for one additional ten-year term.
Franchise Financing
We do not provide prospective franchisees with financing for their stores, but we have developed
relationships with several sources of franchisee financing to whom we will refer franchisees.
Typically, franchisees have obtained their own sources of such financing and have not required our
assistance.
Company Store Program
As of March 31, 2010 there were 11 Company-owned Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores.
Company-owned stores provide a training ground for Company-owned store personnel and district
managers and a controllable testing ground for new products and promotions, operating and training
methods and merchandising techniques, which may then be incorporated into the franchise store
operations.
Managers of Company-owned stores are required to comply with all Company operating standards and
undergo training and receive support from us similar to the training and support provided to
franchisees. See Franchising Program-Training and Support and Franchising Program-Quality
Standards and Control.
Manufacturing Operations
General
We manufacture our chocolate candies at our factory in Durango, Colorado. All products are produced
consistent with our philosophy of using only the finest, highest quality ingredients to achieve our
marketing motto of the Peak of Perfection in Handmade Chocolates®.
Our management has always believed that we should control the manufacturing of our own chocolate
products. By controlling manufacturing, we can better maintain our high product quality standards,
offer unique, proprietary products, manage costs, control production and shipment schedules and
potentially pursue new or under-utilized distribution channels.
Manufacturing Processes
The manufacturing process primarily involves cooking or preparing candy centers, including nuts,
caramel, peanut butter, creams and jellies, and then coating them with chocolate or other toppings.
All of these processes are conducted in carefully controlled temperature ranges, and we employ
strict quality control procedures at every stage of the manufacturing process. We use a combination
of manual and automated processes at our factory. Although we believe that it is currently
preferable to perform certain manufacturing processes, such as dipping of some large pieces, by
hand, automation increases the speed and efficiency of the manufacturing process. We have from time
to time automated processes formerly performed by hand where it has become cost-effective for us to
do so without compromising product quality or appearance.
We seek to ensure the freshness of products sold in Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores with
frequent shipments. Most Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stores do not have significant space for
the storage of inventory, and we encourage franchisees and store managers to order only the
quantities that they can reasonably expect to sell within approximately two to four weeks. For
these reasons, we generally do not have a significant backlog of orders.
Ingredients
The principal ingredients used in our products are chocolate, nuts, sugar, corn syrup, cream and
butter. The factory receives shipments of ingredients daily. To ensure the consistency of our
products, we buy ingredients from a limited number of reliable suppliers. In order to assure a
continuous supply of chocolate and certain nuts, we frequently enter into purchase contracts of
between six to eighteen months for these products. Because prices for these products may fluctuate,
we may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts, but we may be required to pay
above-market prices if prices fall. We have one or more alternative sources for all essential
ingredients and therefore believe that the loss of any supplier would not have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations. We currently purchase small amounts of finished candy from
third parties on a private label basis for sale in Rocky Mountain Chocolate
9
Factory stores.
Trucking Operations
We operate eight trucks and ship a substantial portion of our products from the factory on our own
fleet. Our trucking operations enable us to deliver our products to the stores quickly and
cost-effectively. In addition, we back-haul our own ingredients and supplies, as well as products
from third parties, on return trips, which helps achieve even greater efficiencies and cost
savings.
Marketing
We rely primarily on in-store promotion and point-of-purchase materials to promote the sale of our
products. The monthly marketing fees collected from franchisees are used by us to develop new
packaging and in-store promotion and point-of-purchase materials, and to create and update our
local store marketing handbooks.
We focus on local store marketing efforts by providing customizable marketing materials, including
advertisements, coupons, flyers and mail order catalogs generated by its in-house Creative Services
department. The department works directly with franchisees to implement local store marketing
programs.
We aggressively seek low cost, high return publicity opportunities through participation in local
and regional events, sponsorships and charitable causes. We have not historically and do not intend
to engage in national advertising in the near future.
Competition
The retailing of confectionery products is highly competitive. We and our franchisees compete with
numerous businesses that offer confectionery products. Many of these competitors have greater name
recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than us. In addition, there is intense
competition among retailers for real estate sites, store personnel and qualified franchisees.
We believe that our principal competitive strengths lie in our name recognition and our reputation
for the quality, value, variety and taste of our products and the special ambiance of our stores;
our knowledge and experience in applying criteria for selection of new store locations; our
expertise in merchandising and marketing of chocolate and other candy products; and the control and
training infrastructures we have implemented to assure execution of successful practices and
techniques at its store locations. In addition, by controlling the manufacturing of our own
chocolate products, we can better maintain our high product quality standards for those products,
offer proprietary products, manage costs, control production and shipment schedules and pursue new
or under-utilized distribution channels.
Trade Name and Trademarks
The trade name Rocky Mountain Chocolate FactoryÒ, the phrases, The Peak of Perfection in
Handmade ChocolatesÒ, Americas ChocolatierÒ, The Worlds Chocolatierâ as
well as all other trademarks, service marks, symbols, slogans, emblems, logos and designs used in
the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory system, are our proprietary rights. We believe that all of the
foregoing of material importance to our business. The registration for the trademark Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory is registered in the United States and Canada. Applications have been
filed to register the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory trademark and/or obtained in certain foreign
countries.
We have not attempted to obtain patent protection for the proprietary recipes developed by our
master candy-maker and instead rely upon our ability to maintain the confidentiality of those
recipes.
Employees
At February 28, 2010, we employed approximately 250 people. Most employees, with the exception of
store management, factory management and corporate management, are paid on an hourly basis. We also
employ some people on a temporary basis during peak periods of store and factory operations. We
seek to assure that participatory management processes, mutual respect and professionalism and high
performance expectations for the employee exist throughout the organization. We believe that we
provide working conditions, wages and benefits that compare favorably with those of our
competitors. Our employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our
employee relations to be good.
10
Executive Officers
The executive officers of the Company and their ages at April 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
Franklin E. Crail |
|
|
68 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Director |
Bryan J. Merryman |
|
|
49 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Director |
Gregory L. Pope |
|
|
44 |
|
|
Sr. Vice President Franchise Development
and Operations |
Edward L. Dudley |
|
|
46 |
|
|
Sr. Vice President Sales and Marketing |
William K. Jobson |
|
|
54 |
|
|
Chief Information Officer |
Jay B. Haws |
|
|
60 |
|
|
Vice President Creative Services |
Jeremy M. Kinney |
|
|
33 |
|
|
Vice President Finance |
Donna L. Coupe |
|
|
44 |
|
|
Vice President Franchise Support and
Training |
Virginia M. Perez |
|
|
72 |
|
|
Corporate Secretary |
Mr. Crail co-founded the first Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store in May 1981. Since the
incorporation of the Company in November 1982, he has served as its President and a Director. He
was elected Chairman of the Board in March 1986. Prior to founding the Company, Mr. Crail was
co-founder and president of CNI Data Processing, Inc., a software firm which developed automated
billing systems for the cable television industry.
Mr. Merryman joined the Company in December 1997 as Vice President Finance and Chief Financial
Officer. Since April 1999 Mr. Merryman has also served the Company as the Chief Operating Officer
and as a Director, and since January 2000 as its Treasurer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr.
Merryman was a principal in Knightsbridge Holdings, Inc. (a leveraged buyout firm) from January
1997 to December 1997. Mr. Merryman also served as Chief Financial Officer of Super Shops, Inc., a
retailer and manufacturer of aftermarket auto parts from July 1996 to November 1997 and was
employed for more than eleven years by Deloitte and Touche LLP, most recently as a senior manager.
Mr. Pope became Sr. Vice President of Franchise Development and Operations in May 2004. Since
joining the Company in October 1990, he has served in various positions including store manager,
new store opener and franchise field consultant. In March 1996 he became Director of Franchise
Development and Support. In June 2001 he became Vice President of Franchise Development, a position
he held until he was promoted to his present position.
Mr. Dudley joined the Company in January 1997 to spearhead the Companys newly formed Product Sales
Development function as Vice President Sales and Marketing, with the goal of increasing the
Companys factory and retail sales. He was promoted to Senior Vice President in June 2001. During
his 10 year career with Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Mr. Dudley served in a number of senior
marketing and sales management capacities, including most recently that of Director, Distribution
Services from March 1996 to January 1997.
Mr. Jobson joined the Company in July 1998 as Director of Information Technology. In June 2001, he
was promoted to Chief Information Officer, a position created to enhance the Companys strategic
focus on information and information technology. From July 1995 to July 1998, Mr. Jobson worked for
ADAC Laboratories in Durango, Colorado, a leading provider of diagnostic imaging and information
systems solutions in the healthcare industry, as Manager of Technical Services and before that,
Regional Manager.
Mr. Haws joined the Company in August 1991 as Vice President of Creative Services. Since 1981, Mr.
Haws had been closely associated with the Company both as a franchisee and marketing/graphic design
consultant. From 1986 to 1991 he operated two Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises located
in San Francisco, California. From 1983 to 1989 he served as Vice President of Marketing for Image
Group, Inc., a marketing communications firm based in Northern California. Concurrently, Mr. Haws
was co-owner of two other Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchises located in Sacramento, and
Walnut Creek California. From 1973 to 1983 he was principal of Jay Haws and Associates, an
advertising and graphic design agency.
Mr. Kinney became Vice President of Finance in May 2008. Since joining the Company in March 1999,
he has served in various operational and financial positions including Director of Retail
Operations and Operational Analysis. In May 2007 he became Corporate Controller, a position he held
until he was promoted to his present position.
Ms. Coupe became Vice President of Franchise Support and Training in June 2008. From 1992-1997 she
managed franchised stores in Northern California for absentee owners. Since joining the company in
October 1997, she has served in various positions including Field Consultant, Regional Manager and
Director of Franchise Support.
11
Ms. Perez joined the Company in June 1996 and has served as the Companys corporate secretary since
February, 1997. From 1992 until joining the Company, she was employed by Huettig & Schromm, Inc., a
property management and development firm in Palo Alto, California. Ms. Perez is a paralegal and
has held various administrative positions during her career including executive assistant to the
Chairman and owner of Sunset Magazine & Books, Inc.
Seasonal Factors
Our sales and earnings are seasonal, with significantly higher sales and earnings occurring during
the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons than at other times of the year, which causes
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations. In addition, quarterly results have been, and
in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and the sale of
franchises. Because of the seasonality of our business and the impact of new store openings and
sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
Regulation
Each of the Company-owned and franchised stores is subject to licensing and regulation by the
health, sanitation, safety, building and fire agencies in the state or municipality where located.
Difficulties or failures in obtaining the required licensing or approvals could delay or prevent
the opening of new stores. New stores must also comply with landlord and developer criteria.
Many states have laws regulating franchise operations, including registration and disclosure
requirements in the offer and sale of franchises. We are also subject to the Federal Trade
Commission regulations relating to disclosure requirements in the sale of franchises and ongoing
disclosure obligations.
Additionally, certain states have enacted and others may enact laws and regulations governing the
termination or non-renewal of franchises and other aspects of the franchise relationship that are
intended to protect franchisees. Although these laws and regulations, and related court decisions,
may limit our ability to terminate franchises and alter franchise agreements, we do not believe
that such laws or decisions will have a material adverse effect on our franchise operations.
However, the laws applicable to franchise operations and relationships continue to develop, and we
are unable to predict the effect on our intended operations of additional requirements or
restrictions that may be enacted or of court decisions that may be adverse to franchisers.
Federal and state environmental regulations have not had a material impact on our operations but
more stringent and varied requirements of local governmental bodies with respect to zoning, land
use and environmental factors could delay construction of new stores.
Companies engaged in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products are subject to
extensive regulation by various governmental agencies. A finding of a failure to comply with one or
more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of all or a
portion of our facilities for an indeterminate period of time. Our product labeling is subject to
and complies with the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 and the Food Allergen Labeling
and Consumer Protection Act of 2004.
We provide a limited amount of trucking services to third parties, to fill available space on our
trucks. Our trucking operations are subject to various federal and state regulations, including
regulations of the Federal Highway Administration and other federal and state agencies applicable
to motor carriers, safety requirements of the Department of Transportation relating to interstate
transportation and federal, state and Canadian provincial regulations governing matters such as
vehicle weight and dimensions.
We believe that we are operating in substantial compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations.
Available Information
The Internet address of our website is www.rmcf.com.
We make available free of charge, through our Internet website, our annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed
or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC).
12
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Current Financial Crisis and General Economic Conditions Could Have A Material Adverse Effect
on the Companys Business, Results of Operations and Liquidity
Consumer purchases of discretionary items, including the Companys products generally decline
during recessionary periods and other periods where disposable income is adversely affected. The
Companys performance is subject to factors that affect worldwide economic conditions including
employment, consumer debt, reductions in net worth based on recent severe market declines,
residential real estate and mortgage markets, taxation, fuel and energy prices, interest rates,
consumer confidence, value of the U.S. dollar versus foreign currencies and other macroeconomic
factors. Recently, these factors have caused consumer spending to deteriorate significantly and
may cause levels of spending to remain depressed for the foreseeable future. These factors may
cause consumers to purchase products from lower priced competitors or to defer purchases of
products altogether.
The economic downturn could have a material effect on the Companys results of operations and its
liquidity and capital resources. It could also impact the Companys ability to fund its growth
and/or result in the Company becoming reliant on external financing, the availability of which may
be uncertain.
In addition, the current economic environment may exacerbate some of the risks noted below.
Comparable Store Sales Have Been Negatively Affected by the Economy and Will Continue to Fluctuate
on a Regular Basis
The Companys comparable store sales defined as year-over-year sales for a store that has been open
at least one year, have fluctuated significantly in the past on an annual and quarterly basis and
are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. During the past five fiscal years, comparable
sales results have fluctuated as follows: (a) from (5.4%) to 2.4% for annual results; (b) from
(10.0%) to 4.1% for quarterly results. The Companys comparable store sales were particularly
adversely affected by the economy in the fourth quarter of FY 2009 and continue to be adversely
affected through the first three quarters of FY 2010. Same store sales increased 1.4% in the
fourth quarter of FY 2010. Sustained declines in comparable store sales or significant comparable
store sales declines in any single period could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations.
The Availability and Price of Principal Ingredients Used in Our Products Are Subject to Factors
Beyond Our Control
Several of the principal ingredients used in our products, including chocolate and nuts, are
subject to significant price fluctuations. Although cocoa beans, the primary raw material used in
the production of chocolate, are grown commercially in Africa, Brazil and several other countries
around the world, cocoa beans are traded in the commodities market, and their supply and price are
therefore subject to volatility. We believe our principal chocolate supplier purchases most of its
beans at negotiated prices from African growers, often at a premium to commodity prices. The supply
and price of cocoa beans, and in turn of chocolate, are affected by many factors, including
monetary fluctuations and economic, political and weather conditions in countries in which cocoa
beans are grown. We purchase most of our nut meats from domestic suppliers who procure their
products from growers around the world. The price and supply of nuts are also affected by many
factors, including weather conditions in the various regions in which the nuts we use are grown.
Although we often enter into purchase contracts for these products, significant or prolonged
increases in the prices of chocolate or of one or more types of nuts, or the unavailability of
adequate supplies of chocolate or nuts of the quality sought by us, could have a material adverse
effect on us and our results of operations.
Our Expansion Plans Are Dependent on the Availability of Suitable Sites for Franchised Stores at
Reasonable Occupancy Costs
Our expansion plans are critically dependent on our ability to obtain suitable sites at reasonable
occupancy costs for our franchised stores in the regional center environment. There is no assurance
that we will be able to obtain suitable locations for our franchised stores and kiosks in this
environment at a cost that will allow such stores to be economically viable.
Our Growth is Dependent Upon Attracting and Retaining Qualified Franchisees and Their Ability to
Operate Their Franchised Stores Successfully
Our continued growth and success is dependent in part upon our ability to attract, retain and
contract with qualified franchisees and the ability of those franchisees to operate their
13
stores successfully and to promote and develop the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory store concept
and our reputation for an enjoyable in-store experience and product quality. Although we have
established criteria to evaluate prospective franchisees and have been successful in attracting
franchisees, there can be no assurance that franchisees will be able to operate successfully Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory stores in their franchise areas in a manner consistent with our concepts
and standards.
We Are Subject to Federal, State and Local Regulation
We are subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission and must comply with certain state
laws governing the offer, sale and termination of franchises and the refusal to renew franchises.
Many state laws also regulate substantive aspects of the franchisor-franchisee relationship by, for
example, requiring the franchisor to deal with its franchisees in good faith, prohibiting
interference with the right of free association among franchisees and regulating discrimination
among franchisees in charges, royalties or fees. Franchise laws continue to develop and change, and
changes in such laws could impose additional costs and burdens on franchisors. Our failure to
obtain approvals to sell franchises and the adoption of new franchise laws, or changes in existing
laws, could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of operations.
Each of our Company-owned and franchised stores is subject to licensing and regulation by the
health, sanitation, safety, building and fire agencies in the state or municipality where located.
Difficulties or failures in obtaining required licenses or approvals from such agencies could delay
or prevent the opening of a new store. We and our franchisees are also subject to laws governing
our relationships with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working and safety
conditions and citizenship requirements. Because a significant number of our employees are paid at
rates related to the federal minimum wage, increases in the minimum wage would increase our labor
costs. The failure to obtain required licenses or approvals, or an increase in the minimum wage
rate, employee benefits costs (including costs associated with mandated health insurance coverage)
or other costs associated with employees, could have a material adverse effect on us and our
results of operations.
Companies engaged in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of food products are subject to
extensive regulation by various governmental agencies. A finding of a failure to comply with one or
more regulations could result in the imposition of sanctions, including the closing of all or a
portion of our facilities for an indeterminate period of time, and could have a material adverse
effect on us and our results of operations.
The Retailing of Confectionery Products is Highly Competitive and Many of Our Competitors Have
Competitive Advantages Over Us.
The retailing of confectionery products is highly competitive. We and our franchisees compete with
numerous businesses that offer confectionery products. Many of these competitors have greater name
recognition and financial, marketing and other resources than we do. In addition, there is intense
competition among retailers for real estate sites, store personnel and qualified franchisees.
Competitive market conditions could have a material adverse effect on us and our results of
operations and our ability to expand successfully.
Changes in Consumer Tastes and Trends Could Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Operations
The sale of our products is affected by changes in consumer tastes and eating habits, including
views regarding consumption of chocolate. Numerous other factors that we cannot control, such as
economic conditions, demographic trends, traffic patterns and weather conditions, influence the
sale of our products. Changes in any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on us
and our results of operations.
A Significant Shift by Franchisees from Company Manufactured Products to Products Produced By Third
Parties Could Adversely Effect Our Operations
We believe that approximately 40% of franchised stores revenues are generated by sales of products
manufactured by and purchased from us, 55% by sales of products made in the stores with ingredients
purchased from us or approved suppliers and 5% by sales of products purchased from approved
suppliers for resale in the stores. Franchisees sales of products manufactured by us generate
higher revenues to us than sales of store-made or other products. A significant decrease in the
amount of products franchisees purchase from us, therefore, could adversely affect our total
revenues and results of operations. Such a decrease could result from franchisees decisions to
sell more store-made products or products purchased from third party suppliers.
14
Increases in Costs of Ingredients and Labor Could Adversely Effect Our Operations
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs of ingredients, energy and labor directly
affect our operations. Most of our leases provide for cost-of-living adjustments and require us to
pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses, all of which are subject to inflation. Additionally,
our future lease costs for new facilities may reflect potentially escalating costs of real estate
and construction. There is no assurance that we will be able to pass on our increased costs to our
customers.
The Seasonality of Our Sales Can Have a Significant Impact on Our Financial Results from Quarter to
Quarter
Our sales and earnings are seasonal, with significantly higher sales and earnings occurring during
the Christmas and summer vacation seasons than at other times of the year, which causes
fluctuations in our quarterly results of operations. In addition, quarterly results have been, and
in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and the sale of
franchises. Because of the seasonality of our business and the impact of new store openings and
sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year. See Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Companys manufacturing operations and corporate headquarters are located at its 53,000 square
foot manufacturing facility, which it owns, in Durango, Colorado. During FY 2010, the Companys
factory produced approximately 2.33 million pounds of chocolate candies, an increase of 5% from the
approximately 2.21 million pounds produced in FY 2009. During FY 2008 the Company conducted a study
of factory capacity. As a result of this study, the Company believes the factory has the capacity
to produce approximately 5.3 million pounds per year. In January 1998, the Company acquired a
two-acre parcel adjacent to its factory to ensure the availability of adequate space to expand the
factory as volume demands.
As of March 31, 2010, 10 of the 11 Company-owned stores were occupied pursuant to non-cancelable
leases of five to ten years having varying expiration dates from December 2010 to December 2019,
some of which contain optional five-year renewal rights. The Company does not deem any individual
store lease to be significant in relation to its overall operations.
The Company acts as primary lessee of some franchised store premises, which it then subleases to
franchisees, but the majority of existing locations are leased by the franchisee directly. Current
Company policy is not to act as primary lessee on any further franchised locations. At March 31,
2010, the Company was the primary lessee at 2 of its 312 franchised stores. The subleases for such
stores are on the same terms as the Companys leases of the premises. For information as to the
amount of the Companys rental obligations under leases on both Company-owned and franchised
stores, see Note 5 of Notes to financial statements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not currently involved in any material legal proceedings other than ordinary routine
litigation incidental to its business.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
Part II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
The Companys Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market which is part of The Nasdaq Stock
Market under the trading symbol RMCF. On February 17, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a
fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.10 cents per common share outstanding. The cash dividend was
paid March 13, 2009 to shareholders of record as of February 27, 2009. On February 17, 2010, the
Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.10 cents per common share
outstanding. The cash dividend was paid March 12, 2010 to shareholders of record as of February 26,
2010.
15
The table below sets forth high and low price information and dividends declared for the Common
Stock for each quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009.
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
HIGH |
|
LOW |
|
declared |
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
8.93 |
|
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
9.20 |
|
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
8.65 |
|
|
$ |
7.50 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
9.19 |
|
|
$ |
4.08 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended February 28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
HIGH |
|
LOW |
|
declared |
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
|
$ |
5.30 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
9.60 |
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
11.99 |
|
|
$ |
8.51 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
13.29 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
|
|
.1000 |
|
On April 30, 2010 the closing price for the Common Stock was $9.52.
Holders
On April 30, 2010 there were approximately 400 record holders of the Companys Common Stock. The
Company believes that there are more than 800 beneficial owners of its Common Stock.
16
Comparison of Return on Equity
The following graph reflects the total return, which assumes reinvestment of dividends, of a
$100 investment in the Companys Common Stock, in the Nasdaq Index, in the Russell 2000 Index and
in a Peer Group Index of companies in the confectionery industry, on February 28, 2005. The stock
price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price
performance.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Period |
|
Return |
|
Return |
|
Return |
|
Return |
|
Return |
Company/Index Name |
|
2/2005 |
|
2/2006 |
|
2/2007 |
|
2/2008 |
|
2/2009 |
|
2/2010 |
|
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
102.15 |
|
|
|
93.06 |
|
|
|
93.28 |
|
|
|
44.67 |
|
|
|
69.31 |
|
NASDAQ Composite |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
110.59 |
|
|
|
120.76 |
|
|
|
112.35 |
|
|
|
68.35 |
|
|
|
110.80 |
|
Russell 2000 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
116.59 |
|
|
|
128.10 |
|
|
|
112.16 |
|
|
|
64.62 |
|
|
|
105.95 |
|
Peer Group (1) |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
89.42 |
|
|
|
98.58 |
|
|
|
100.53 |
|
|
|
86.30 |
|
|
|
110.72 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comprised of the following companies: The Hershey Company, Imperial Sugar Company,
Paradise, Inc., Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc., and Valhi, Inc. |
17
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented below for the fiscal years ended February 28 or 29, 2006
through 2010, are derived from the Financial Statements of the Company, which have been audited by
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC, independent registered public accounting firm. The selected
financial data should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Report and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29, |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Selected Statement of
Operations Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
28,437 |
|
|
$ |
28,539 |
|
|
$ |
31,878 |
|
|
$ |
31,573 |
|
|
$ |
28,074 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
5,819 |
|
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
|
7,561 |
|
|
|
6,459 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,580 |
|
|
$ |
3,719 |
|
|
$ |
4,961 |
|
|
$ |
4,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Common
Share |
|
$ |
.60 |
|
|
$ |
.62 |
|
|
$ |
.78 |
|
|
$ |
.74 |
|
|
$ |
.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per
Common Share |
|
$ |
.58 |
|
|
$ |
.60 |
|
|
$ |
.76 |
|
|
$ |
.71 |
|
|
$ |
.58 |
|
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding |
|
|
6,013 |
|
|
|
5,985 |
|
|
|
6,341 |
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
6,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding, assuming
dilution |
|
|
6,210 |
|
|
|
6,157 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
Selected Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
8,930 |
|
|
$ |
7,371 |
|
|
$ |
5,152 |
|
|
$ |
7,503 |
|
|
$ |
7,533 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
18,920 |
|
|
|
16,841 |
|
|
|
16,147 |
|
|
|
18,456 |
|
|
|
19,057 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
14,731 |
|
|
|
13,242 |
|
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
|
14,515 |
|
|
|
15,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividend Declared per
Common Share |
|
$ |
.400 |
|
|
$ |
.400 |
|
|
$ |
.390 |
|
|
$ |
.324 |
|
|
$ |
.271 |
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
A Note About Forward Looking Statements
The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related Notes of
the Company included elsewhere in this report. This Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The nature of the
Companys operations and the environment in which it operates subject it to changing economic,
competitive, regulatory and technological conditions, risks and uncertainties. The statements,
other than statements of historical fact, included in this report are forward-looking statements.
Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this document may be identified by the use of
forward-looking words such as will, intend, believe, expect, anticipate, should,
plan, estimate and potential, or similar expressions. Factors which could cause results to
differ include, but are not limited to: changes in the confectionery business environment,
seasonality, consumer interest in the Companys products, general economic conditions, consumer
trends, costs and availability of raw materials, competition, the success of our co-branding
strategy and the effect of government regulations. Government regulations which the Company and its
franchisees either are or may be subject to and which could cause results to differ from
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: local, state and federal laws regarding
health, sanitation, safety, building and fire codes, franchising, employment, manufacturing,
packaging and distribution of food products and motor carriers. For a detailed discussion of the
risks and uncertainties that may cause the Companys actual results to differ from the
forward-looking statements contained herein, please see the Risk Factors contained in this
document at 1A. These forward-looking statements apply only as of the date of this report. As such
they should not be unduly relied upon for more current circumstances. Except as required by law,
the Company is not obligated to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements
that might reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or those that
might reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
18
Current Trends and Outlook
The fourth quarter retail environment of FY 2009 proved to be the most challenging in the Companys
history. Global economic turmoil resulted in a swift and steep decline in consumer spending and a
shopping landscape dominated by promotional activity.
The Company experienced this difficult environment throughout FY 2010. Therefore, the Company has
and will continue to focus on managing the business in a seasoned, disciplined and controlled
manner.
In managing the business in FY 2011, the Company is taking a conservative view of market
conditions. The Company will continue to focus on its long-term objectives while seeking to
maintain flexibility to respond to market conditions.
The Company is a product-based international franchisor. The Companys revenues and profitability
are derived principally from its franchised system of retail stores that feature chocolate and
other confectionery products. The Company also sells its candy in selected locations outside its
system of retail stores to build brand awareness. The Company operates eleven retail units as a
laboratory to test marketing, design and operational initiatives.
The Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales because of the location of its
franchisees, which have traditionally been located in resort or tourist locations. As the Company
expands its geographical diversity to include regional centers, it has seen some moderation to its
seasonal sales mix. Seasonal fluctuation in sales causes fluctuations in quarterly results of
operations. Historically, the strongest sales of the Companys products have occurred during the
Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons. Additionally, quarterly results have been, and in
the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and sales of franchises.
Because of the seasonality of the Companys business and the impact of new store openings and sales
of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results that may be
achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
The most important factors in continued growth in the Companys earnings are ongoing unit growth,
increased same store sales and increased same store pounds purchased from the factory.
Historically, unit growth has more than offset decreases in same store sales and same store pounds
purchased.
The Companys ability to successfully achieve expansion of its Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
franchise system depends on many factors not within the Companys control including the
availability of suitable sites for new store establishment and the availability of qualified
franchisees to support such expansion.
Efforts to reverse the decline in same store pounds purchased from the factory by franchised stores
and to increase total factory sales depend on many factors, including new store openings,
competition, the receptivity of the Companys franchise system to the Companys product
introductions and promotional programs. Same store pounds purchased from the factory by franchised
stores declined approximately 6% in the first quarter, declined approximately 9% in the second
quarter, declined approximately 4% in the third quarter, were unchanged in the fourth quarter and
declined approximately 4% overall in FY 2010 as compared to the same periods in FY 2009.
On May 11, 2009 the Company announced the expansion of the co-branding test relationship with Cold
Stone Creamery. The Company and Cold Stone Creamery, Inc. have agreed to expand the co-branding
relationship to several hundred potential locations, based upon the performance of several test
locations, operating under the test agreement announced in October 2008. The Company believes that
if this co-branding strategy proves financially viable it could represent a significant future
growth opportunity. As of February 28, 2010, licensees operated 19 co-branded locations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based
upon the Companys financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures. Estimates and assumptions
include, but are not limited to, the carrying value of accounts and notes receivable from
franchisees, inventories, the useful lives of fixed assets, goodwill, and other intangible assets,
income taxes, contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on analyses, of which
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates.
19
We believe that the following represent our more critical estimates and assumptions used in the
preparation of our financial statements, although not all inclusive.
Accounts and Notes Receivable In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to
customers, primarily franchisees, that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria. The Company believes
that it has limited concentration of credit risk primarily because its receivables are secured by
the assets of the franchisees to which the Company ordinarily extends credit, including, but not
limited to, their franchise rights and inventories. An allowance for doubtful accounts is
determined through analysis of the aging of accounts receivable, assessments of collectability
based on historical trends, and an evaluation of the impact of current and projected economic
conditions. The process by which the Company performs its analysis is conducted on a customer by
customer, or franchisee by franchisee, basis and takes into account, among other relevant factors,
sales history, outstanding receivables, customer financial strength, as well as customer specific
and geographic market factors relevant to projected performance. The Company monitors the
collectability of its accounts receivable on an ongoing basis by assessing the credit worthiness of
its customers and evaluating the impact of reasonably likely changes in economic conditions that
may impact credit risks. Estimates with regard to the collectability of accounts receivable are
reasonably likely to change in the future.
The Company recorded average expense of approximately $171,000 per year for potential uncollectible
accounts over the three-year period ended February 28, 2010. Write-offs of uncollectible accounts
net of recoveries averaged approximately $102,000 over the same period. The provision for
uncollectible accounts is recognized as general and administrative expense in the Statements of
Income. Over the past three years, the allowances for doubtful notes and accounts have ranged from
2.8% to 7.6% of gross receivables.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes revenue on sales of products to franchisees and other
customers at the time of delivery. Franchise fee revenue is recognized upon the opening of the
store. The Company also recognizes a marketing and promotion fee of one percent (1%) of the Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory franchised stores gross retail sales and a royalty fee based on gross
retail sales. Beginning with franchise store openings in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004, the
Company modified its royalty structure. Under the current structure, the Company recognizes no
royalty on franchised stores retail sales of products purchased from the Company and recognizes a
ten percent (10%) royalty on all other sales of product sold at franchise locations. For franchise
stores opened prior to the third quarter of FY 2004 the Company recognizes a royalty fee of five
percent (5%) of franchised stores gross retail sales.
Inventories The Companys inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value and are
reduced by an allowance for slow-moving, excess, discontinued and shelf-life expired inventories.
Our estimate for such allowance is based on our review of inventories on hand compared to estimated
future usage and demand for our products. Such review encompasses not only potentially perishable
inventories but also specialty packaging, much of it specific to certain holiday seasons. If actual
future usage and demand for our products are less favorable than those projected by our review,
inventory reserve adjustments may be required. We closely monitor our inventory, both perishable
and non-perishable, and related shelf and product lives. Historically we have experienced low
levels of obsolete inventory or returns of products that have exceeded their shelf life. Over the
three-year period ended February 28, 2010, the Company recorded expense averaging approximately
$77,000 per year for potential inventory losses, or approximately 0.5% of total cost of sales for
that period.
Goodwill Goodwill consists of the excess of purchase price over the fair market value of acquired
assets and liabilities. Effective March 1, 2002, under ASC Topic 350 all goodwill with indefinite
lives is no longer subject to amortization. ASC Topic 350 requires that an impairment test be
conducted annually or in the event of an impairment indicator. Our test conducted in FY 2010 showed
no impairment of our goodwill.
Other accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of the Companys financial statements
include estimates associated with its evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets, as
well as those used in the determination of liabilities related to litigation and taxation. Various
assumptions and other factors underlie the determination of these significant estimates. The
process of determining significant estimates is fact specific and takes into account factors such
as historical experience, current and expected economic conditions, and product mix. The Company
constantly re-evaluates these significant factors and makes adjustments where facts and
circumstances dictate. Historically, actual results have not significantly deviated from those
determined using the estimates described above.
20
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2010 Compared To Fiscal 2009
Results Summary
Basic earnings per share decreased 3.2% from $.62 in FY 2009 to $.60 in FY 2010. Revenues decreased
0.4% from FY 2009 to FY 2010. Operating income decreased 3.0% from $5.8 million in FY 2009 to $5.6
million in FY 2010. Net income decreased 3.7% from $3.7 million in FY 2009 to $3.6 million in FY
2010. The decrease in revenue, earnings per share, operating income, and net income in FY 2010
compared to FY 2009 was due primarily to decreased same store sales, a decrease in the average
number of domestic franchise stores in operation and decreased same store pounds purchased by
domestic franchise locations.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Factory sales |
|
$ |
20,118.2 |
|
|
$ |
20,572.5 |
|
|
|
(454.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
Retail sales |
|
|
2,825.8 |
|
|
|
1,880.7 |
|
|
|
945.1 |
|
|
|
50.3 |
% |
Royalty and marketing fees |
|
|
5,288.0 |
|
|
|
5,627.0 |
|
|
|
(339.0 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
%) |
Franchise fees |
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
458.5 |
|
|
|
(254.0 |
) |
|
|
(55.4 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
28,436.5 |
|
|
$ |
28,538.7 |
|
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
Factory Sales
Factory sales decreased in FY 2010 compared to FY 2009 due to a decrease in same store pounds
purchased by domestic franchise stores partially offset by an 11.0% increase in product shipments
to specialty markets customers. Same store pounds purchased in FY 2010 were down approximately 4%
from FY 2009. The Company believes the decrease in same store pounds purchased is due primarily to
a product mix shift from factory products to products made in the stores and is primarily a result
of the United States recession and the resulting financial pressure the recession has created for
our system of franchised stores.
Retail Sales
The increase in total retail sales was due to an increase in the average number of Company-owned
stores in operation from six during FY 2009 to nine Company-owned stores in FY 2010. Same store
retail sales at Company-owned store declined 1.7% in FY 2010 compared to FY 2009.
Royalties, Marketing Fees and Franchise Fees
The decrease in royalties and marketing fees resulted from a decrease in same store sales of 2.9%
and a decrease in the average number of domestic units in operation from 284 in FY 2009 to 266 in
FY 2010. Franchise fee revenues decreased due to a decrease in the number of domestic franchises
opened during the year when compared to the same period in the prior year, partially offset by
license fees related to the Companys Cold Stone Creamery co-branding initiative.
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Cost of sales factory
adjusted |
|
$ |
13,830.4 |
|
|
$ |
14,360.3 |
|
|
$ |
(529.9 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
%) |
Cost of sales retail |
|
|
1,080.2 |
|
|
|
716.8 |
|
|
|
363.4 |
|
|
|
50.7 |
% |
Franchise costs |
|
|
1,499.5 |
|
|
|
1,718.6 |
|
|
|
(219.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
%) |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,505.4 |
|
|
|
1,495.4 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
2,422.1 |
|
|
|
2,562.3 |
|
|
|
(140.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
%) |
Retail operating |
|
|
1,757.0 |
|
|
|
1,107.9 |
|
|
|
649.1 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
% |
Total |
|
$ |
22,094.6 |
|
|
$ |
21,961.3 |
|
|
|
133.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
6,287.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,212.2 |
|
|
$ |
75.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
1,745.6 |
|
|
|
1,163.9 |
|
|
|
581.7 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
Total |
|
$ |
8,033.4 |
|
|
$ |
7,376.1 |
|
|
$ |
657.3 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Retail |
|
|
61.8 |
% |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
%) |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
Total |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
21
Fiscal 2010 Compared To Fiscal 2009 CONTINUED
Adjusted gross margin is equal to gross margin minus depreciation and amortization expense. We
believe adjusted gross margin is helpful in understanding our past performance as a supplement to
gross margin and other performance measures calculated in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). We believe that adjusted gross margin is useful
to investors because it provides a measure of operating performance and our ability to generate
cash that is unaffected by non-cash accounting measures. Additionally, we use adjusted gross
margin rather than gross margin to make incremental pricing decisions. Adjusted gross margin has
limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization
expense and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for any measure reported
under GAAP. Our use of capital assets makes depreciation and amortization expense a necessary
element of our costs and our ability to generate income. Due to these limitations, we use adjusted
gross margin as a measure of performance only in conjunction with GAAP measures of performance such
as gross margin. The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to gross
margin, the most comparable performance measure under GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
6,287.8 |
|
|
$ |
6,212.2 |
|
Less: Depreciated and Amortization |
|
|
336.0 |
|
|
|
370.5 |
|
Factory GAAP gross margin |
|
$ |
5,951.8 |
|
|
$ |
5,841.7 |
|
Cost of Sales
Factory margins increased 110 basis points from FY 2009 compared to FY 2010 due primarily to
lower transportation related costs resulting from a decrease in fuel costs during FY 2010 versus FY
2009 and an increase in manufacturing efficiencies related to increased production.
Franchise Costs
The decrease in franchise costs is due to lower professional fees in FY 2010 compared with FY 2009.
As a percentage of total royalty and marketing fees and franchise fee revenue, franchise costs
decreased to 27.3% in FY 2010 from 28.2% in FY 2009.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing costs were approximately the same in FY 2010 as in FY 2009.
General and Administrative
The decrease in general and administrative costs is due primarily to a decrease in professional
fees. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased to 8.5% in
FY 2010 compared to 9.0% in FY 2009.
Retail Operating Expenses
The increase in retail operating expenses during FY 2010 compared to FY 2009 was due primarily to
an increase in the average number of Company-owned stores in operation from six during FY 2009 to
nine average Company-owned stores in FY 2010. Retail operating expenses, as a percentage of retail
sales, increased from 58.9% in FY 2009 to 62.2% in FY 2010 due to a higher increase in costs
relative to the increase in revenues.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of $699,000 in FY 2010 decreased 7.8% from $758,000 incurred in FY
2009 due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
Other, Net
Other, net of $27,200 realized in FY 2010 represents an increase of $21,700 from the $5,500
realized in FY 2009 due to an increase in interest income related to higher average notes
receivable balances and higher average outstanding cash balances.
Income Tax Expense
The Companys effective income tax rate in FY 2010 was 36.9% which is an increase of 0.7% compared
to FY 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to a decrease in allowable
deductions.
22
Fiscal 2010 Compared To Fiscal 2009 CONTINUED
The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. ASC
740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
Company adopted the guidance of ASC Topic 740 related to uncertainty in income taxes effective
March 1, 2007 with no impact on the Companys financial statements.
Fiscal 2009 Compared To Fiscal 2008
Results Summary
Basic earnings per share decreased 20.5% from $.78 in FY 2008 to $.62 in FY 2009. Revenues
decreased 10.5% from FY 2008 to FY 2009. Operating income decreased 26.5% from $7.9 million in FY
2008 to $5.8 million in FY 2009. Net income decreased 25.0% from $5.0 million in FY 2008 to $3.7
million in FY 2009. The decrease in revenue, earnings per share, operating income, and net income
in FY 2009 compared to FY 2008 was due primarily to decreased sales to specialty markets and
decreased same store pounds purchased by domestic franchise locations.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Factory sales |
|
$ |
20,572.5 |
|
|
$ |
23,758.2 |
|
|
$ |
(3,185.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
%) |
Retail sales |
|
|
1,880.7 |
|
|
|
1,800.0 |
|
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Royalty and marketing fees |
|
|
5,627.0 |
|
|
|
5,696.9 |
|
|
|
(69.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
%) |
Franchise fees |
|
|
458.5 |
|
|
|
623.1 |
|
|
|
(164.6 |
) |
|
|
(26.4 |
%) |
Total |
|
$ |
28,538.7 |
|
|
$ |
31,878.2 |
|
|
$ |
(3,339.5 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
%) |
Factory Sales
Factory sales decreased in FY 2009 compared to FY 2008 due to a decrease of 29.0% in product
shipments to specialty markets and a decline in same store pounds purchased by domestic franchise
stores. Same store pounds purchased in FY 2009 were down approximately 15% from FY 2008. The
Company believes the decrease in same store pounds purchased is due primarily to a product mix
shift from factory products to products made in the stores and is primarily a result of the United
States recession and the resulting financial pressure the recession has created for our system of
franchised stores.
Retail Sales
The increase in total retail sales was due to a change in the number of Company-owned stores in
operation during FY 2009 compared to FY 2008 resulting from the closure of one Company-owned store
in the first quarter of FY 2009 and the acquisition of one Company-owned store in the second
quarter and two Company-owned stores in the fourth quarter of FY 2009. Same store retail sales at
Company-owned store declined 4.9% in FY 2009 compared to FY 2008.
Royalties, Marketing Fees and Franchise Fees
The decrease in royalties and marketing fees resulted from a decrease in same store sales of 5.4%,
which more than offset the growth in the average number of domestic units in operation from 281 in
FY 2008 to 284 in FY 2009. Franchise fee revenues decreased due to a decrease in the number of
domestic franchises opened during the year when compared to the same period in the prior year.
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
Cost of sales factory
adjusted |
|
$ |
14,360.3 |
|
|
$ |
15,948.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,588.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
%) |
Cost of sales retail |
|
|
716.8 |
|
|
|
729.8 |
|
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
Franchise costs |
|
|
1,718.6 |
|
|
|
1,498.7 |
|
|
|
219.9 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,495.4 |
|
|
|
1,503.2 |
|
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
%) |
General and administrative |
|
|
2,562.3 |
|
|
|
2,505.7 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Retail operating |
|
|
1,107.9 |
|
|
|
994.8 |
|
|
|
113.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Total |
|
$ |
21,961.3 |
|
|
$ |
23,180.9 |
|
|
$ |
(1,219.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
%) |
23
Fiscal 2009 Compared To Fiscal 2008 CONTINUED
Adjusted Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
6,212.2 |
|
|
$ |
7,809.5 |
|
|
$ |
(1,597.3 |
) |
|
|
(20.5 |
%) |
Retail |
|
|
1,163.9 |
|
|
|
1,070.2 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Total |
|
$ |
7,376.1 |
|
|
$ |
8,879.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,503.6 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Percent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
(2.7 |
%) |
|
|
(8.2 |
%) |
Retail |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
59.5 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Total |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
|
|
(5.2 |
%) |
Adjusted gross margin is equal to gross margin minus depreciation and amortization expense. We
believe adjusted gross margin is helpful in understanding our past performance as a supplement to
gross margin and other performance measures calculated in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). We believe that adjusted gross margin is useful
to investors because it provides a measure of operating performance and our ability to generate
cash that is unaffected by non-cash accounting measures. Additionally, we use adjusted gross
margin rather than gross margin to make incremental pricing decisions. Adjusted gross margin has
limitations as an analytical tool because it excludes the impact of depreciation and amortization
expense and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for any measure reported
under GAAP. Our use of capital assets makes depreciation and amortization expense a necessary
element of our costs and our ability to generate income. Due to these limitations, we use adjusted
gross margin as a measure of performance only in conjunction with GAAP measures of performance such
as gross margin. The following table provides a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to gross
margin, the most comparable performance measure under GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($s in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Factory adjusted gross margin |
|
$ |
6,212.2 |
|
|
$ |
7,809.5 |
|
Less: Depreciated and Amortization |
|
|
370.5 |
|
|
|
389.3 |
|
Factory GAAP gross margin |
|
$ |
5,841.7 |
|
|
$ |
7,420.2 |
|
Cost of Sales
Factory margins decreased 270 basis points from the FY 2008 compared to FY 2009 due to lower
manufacturing efficiencies associated with lower production volume and higher commodity prices
during FY 2009 versus FY 2008.
Franchise Costs
The increase in franchise costs is due to higher professional fees and higher compensation costs in
FY 2009 compared with FY 2008. As a percentage of total royalty and marketing fees and franchise
fee revenue, franchise costs increased to 28.2% in FY 2009 from 23.7% in FY 2008.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing costs were approximately the same in FY 2009 as in FY 2008.
General and Administrative
The increase in general and administrative costs is due primarily to an increase in the allowance
for doubtful accounts. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses
increased to 9.0% in FY 2009 compared to 7.9% in FY 2008.
Retail Operating Expenses
The increase in retail operating expenses during FY 2009 compared to FY 2008 was due primarily to
costs associated with the acquisition of three Company-owned stores during FY 2009. Retail
operating expenses, as a percentage of retail sales, increased from 55.3% in FY 2008 to 58.9% in FY
2009 due to a higher increase in costs relative to the increase in revenues.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization of $758,000 in FY 2009 decreased 3.1% from $783,000 incurred in FY
2008 due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated.
24
Fiscal 2009 Compared To Fiscal 2008 CONTINUED
Other, Net
Other, net of $5,500 realized in FY 2009 represents a decrease of $95,500 from the $101,000
realized in FY 2008 due to lower average outstanding cash balances and an increase in interest
expense incurred related to use of the operating line of credit.
Income Tax Expense
The Companys effective income tax rate in FY 2009 was 36.2% which is a decrease of 1.9% compared
to FY 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to an increase in allowable
deductions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of February 28, 2010, working capital was $8.9 million compared with $7.4 million as of February
28, 2009. The change in working capital was due primarily to operating results less the
payment of $2.4 million in cash dividends.
Cash and cash equivalent balances increased from $1.3 million as of February 28, 2009 to $3.7
million as of February 28, 2010 as a result of cash flows generated by operating and investing
activities being greater than cash flows used in financing activities. The Companys current ratio
was 3.71 to 1 at February 28, 2010 in comparison with 3.66 to 1 at February 28, 2009. The Company
monitors current and anticipated future levels of cash and cash equivalents in relation to
anticipated operating, financing and investing requirements.
The Company has a $5 million credit line, of which $5 million was available (subject to certain
borrowing base limitations) as of February 28, 2010, secured by substantially all of the Companys
assets except retail store assets. The credit line is subject to renewal in July, 2011.
The table below presents significant contractual obligations of the Company at February 28, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 years |
|
|
More Than 5 years |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Total Contractual cash obligations |
|
|
3,465 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
For FY 2011, the Company anticipates making capital expenditures of approximately $500,000, which
will be used to maintain and improve existing factory and administrative infrastructure and update
certain Company-owned stores. The Company believes that cash flow from operations will be
sufficient to fund capital expenditures and working capital requirements for FY 2011. If necessary,
the Company has an available bank line of credit to help meet these requirements.
Impact of Inflation
Inflationary factors such as increases in the costs of ingredients and labor directly affect the
Companys operations. Most of the Companys leases provide for cost-of-living adjustments and
require it to pay taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses, all of which are subject to inflation.
Additionally, the Companys future lease cost for new facilities may include potentially escalating
costs of real estate and construction. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to pass
on increased costs to its customers.
Depreciation expense is based on the historical cost to the Company of its fixed assets, and is
therefore potentially less than it would be if it were based on current replacement cost. While
property and equipment acquired in prior years will ultimately have to be replaced at higher
prices, it is expected that replacement will be a gradual process over many years.
Seasonality
The Company is subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales, which cause fluctuations in quarterly
results of operations. Historically, the strongest sales of the Companys products have occurred
during the Christmas holiday and summer vacation seasons. In addition, quarterly results have
been, and in the future are likely to be, affected by the timing of new store openings and sales
25
of franchises. Because of the seasonality of the Companys business and the impact of new store
openings and sales of franchises, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be achieved in other quarters or for a full fiscal year.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company does not engage in commodity futures trading or hedging activities and does not enter
into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading or other speculative purposes. The
Company also does not engage in transactions in foreign currencies or in interest rate swap
transactions that could expose the Company to market risk. However, the Company is exposed to some
commodity price and interest rate risks.
The Company frequently enters into purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for
chocolate and certain nuts. These contracts permit the Company to purchase the specified commodity
at a fixed price on an as-needed basis during the term of the contract. Because prices for these
products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts,
but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall and it is unable to renegotiate
the terms of the contract.
The Company has a $5 million bank line of credit that bears interest at a variable rate. As of
February 28, 2010, no amount was outstanding under the line of credit. The Company does not believe
that it is exposed to any material interest rate risk related to the line of credit.
The Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company has primary responsibility
over the Companys long-term and short-term debt and has primary responsibility for determining the
timing and duration of commodity purchase contracts and negotiating the terms and conditions of
those contracts.
26
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
27
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.
Durango, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (the
Company) as of February 28, 2010 and February 28, 2009, and the related statements of income,
changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
February 28, 2010. In connection with our audit of the financial statements, we have also audited
the financial statement Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three
years in the period ended February 28, 2010. The financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. An audit also included performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 28, 2010 and February 28, 2009, and
the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
February 28, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule II for each of the
three years in the period ended February 28, 2010, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
May 18, 2010
Denver, Colorado
28
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
22,944,017 |
|
|
$ |
22,453,165 |
|
|
$ |
25,558,198 |
|
Franchise and royalty fees |
|
|
5,492,531 |
|
|
|
6,085,534 |
|
|
|
6,319,985 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
28,436,548 |
|
|
|
28,538,699 |
|
|
|
31,878,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales, exclusive of
depreciation and amortization
expense of $336,009, $370,485
and $389,273, respectively |
|
|
14,910,622 |
|
|
|
15,077,143 |
|
|
|
16,678,472 |
|
Franchise costs |
|
|
1,499,477 |
|
|
|
1,718,595 |
|
|
|
1,498,709 |
|
Sales & marketing |
|
|
1,505,431 |
|
|
|
1,495,442 |
|
|
|
1,503,224 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
2,422,147 |
|
|
|
2,562,280 |
|
|
|
2,505,676 |
|
Retail operating |
|
|
1,756,956 |
|
|
|
1,107,872 |
|
|
|
994,789 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
698,580 |
|
|
|
758,322 |
|
|
|
782,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
22,793,213 |
|
|
|
22,719,654 |
|
|
|
23,963,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
5,643,335 |
|
|
|
5,819,045 |
|
|
|
7,914,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,851 |
) |
|
|
(1,566 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
27,210 |
|
|
|
21,341 |
|
|
|
102,360 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
27,210 |
|
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
100,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
5,670,545 |
|
|
|
5,824,535 |
|
|
|
8,015,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
2,090,468 |
|
|
|
2,105,972 |
|
|
|
3,053,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
3,580,077 |
|
|
$ |
3,718,563 |
|
|
$ |
4,961,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
.60 |
|
|
$ |
.62 |
|
|
$ |
.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common Share |
|
$ |
.58 |
|
|
$ |
.60 |
|
|
$ |
.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares
Outstanding |
|
|
6,012,717 |
|
|
|
5,984,791 |
|
|
|
6,341,286 |
|
Dilutive Effect of Employee
Stock Options |
|
|
197,521 |
|
|
|
172,265 |
|
|
|
159,386 |
|
Weighted Average Common Shares
Outstanding, Assuming Dilution |
|
|
6,210,238 |
|
|
|
6,157,056 |
|
|
|
6,500,672 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
29
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AS OF FEBRUARY 28 or 29 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
3,743,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,253,947 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for
doubtful accounts of $395,291 and
$332,719, respectively |
|
|
4,427,526 |
|
|
|
4,229,733 |
|
Notes receivable, current |
|
|
91,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, less reserve for slow
moving inventory of $263,872 and
$251,922, respectively |
|
|
3,281,447 |
|
|
|
4,064,611 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
461,249 |
|
|
|
369,197 |
|
Other |
|
|
220,163 |
|
|
|
224,378 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
12,224,536 |
|
|
|
10,141,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net |
|
|
5,186,709 |
|
|
|
5,253,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable, less current portion |
|
|
263,650 |
|
|
|
124,452 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
1,046,944 |
|
|
|
1,046,944 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
110,025 |
|
|
|
183,135 |
|
Other |
|
|
88,050 |
|
|
|
91,057 |
|
Total other assets |
|
|
1,508,669 |
|
|
|
1,445,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
18,919,914 |
|
|
$ |
16,841,052 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
877,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,074,643 |
|
Accrued salaries and wages |
|
|
646,156 |
|
|
|
423,789 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
946,528 |
|
|
|
531,941 |
|
Dividend payable |
|
|
602,694 |
|
|
|
598,986 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
220,938 |
|
|
|
142,000 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
3,294,148 |
|
|
|
2,771,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
894,429 |
|
|
|
827,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.10 par value; 250,000 authorized;
-0- shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, authorized 50,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undesignated series, authorized 200,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.03 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 6,026,938 and 5,989,858 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively |
|
|
180,808 |
|
|
|
179,696 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,626,602 |
|
|
|
7,311,280 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
6,923,927 |
|
|
|
5,751,017 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
14,731,337 |
|
|
|
13,241,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
18,919,914 |
|
|
$ |
16,841,052 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
30
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
179,696 |
|
|
$ |
179,428 |
|
|
$ |
192,567 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,518 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options, vesting of
restricted stock units and other |
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
1,379 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
180,808 |
|
|
|
179,696 |
|
|
|
179,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-In Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
7,311,280 |
|
|
|
7,047,142 |
|
|
|
6,987,558 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,918,087 |
) |
Stock dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,415,148 |
|
Costs related to stock splits and
dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,647 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
21,080 |
|
|
|
49,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options, vesting of
restricted stock units and other |
|
|
294,243 |
|
|
|
214,863 |
|
|
|
388,290 |
|
Tax benefit from employee stock
transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,880 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
7,626,602 |
|
|
|
7,311,280 |
|
|
|
7,047,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
5,751,017 |
|
|
|
4,428,467 |
|
|
|
7,334,388 |
|
Net income |
|
|
3,580,077 |
|
|
|
3,718,563 |
|
|
|
4,961,376 |
|
Stock dividends declared |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,415,148 |
) |
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
(2,407,167 |
) |
|
|
(2,396,013 |
) |
|
|
(2,452,149 |
) |
Balance at end of year |
|
|
6,923,927 |
|
|
|
5,751,017 |
|
|
|
4,428,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
14,731,337 |
|
|
$ |
13,241,993 |
|
|
$ |
11,655,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
5,989,858 |
|
|
|
5,980,919 |
|
|
|
6,418,905 |
|
Repurchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(483,935 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options, vesting of
restricted stock units and other |
|
|
33,080 |
|
|
|
4,689 |
|
|
|
45,949 |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
6,026,938 |
|
|
|
5,989,858 |
|
|
|
5,980,919 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
31
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED FEBRUARY 28 or 29 |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,580,077 |
|
|
$ |
3,718,563 |
|
|
$ |
4,961,376 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
698,580 |
|
|
|
758,322 |
|
|
|
782,951 |
|
Provision for loss on accounts receivable |
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
219,000 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Provision for inventory loss |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |
|
|
(82,033 |
) |
|
|
20,990 |
|
|
|
34,744 |
|
Expense recorded for stock compensation |
|
|
316,434 |
|
|
|
240,013 |
|
|
|
58,355 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(25,323 |
) |
|
|
(105,180 |
) |
|
|
150,941 |
|
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(470,209 |
) |
|
|
(669,508 |
) |
|
|
(117,460 |
) |
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,357 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
723,164 |
|
|
|
(125,754 |
) |
|
|
(623,320 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(4,709 |
) |
|
|
21,742 |
|
|
|
76,891 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(196,811 |
) |
|
|
(635,861 |
) |
|
|
811,586 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
308,086 |
|
|
|
99,613 |
|
|
|
(167,965 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
328,867 |
|
|
|
21,433 |
|
|
|
(449,784 |
) |
Deferred income |
|
|
78,938 |
|
|
|
(161,000 |
) |
|
|
14,500 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
5,535,061 |
|
|
|
3,482,373 |
|
|
|
5,634,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to notes receivable |
|
|
(230,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds received on notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
132,702 |
|
Proceeds from sale or distribution of
assets |
|
|
116,800 |
|
|
|
8,910 |
|
|
|
29,382 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
(30,169 |
) |
|
|
13,364 |
|
|
|
158,826 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(498,832 |
) |
|
|
(256,034 |
) |
|
|
(578,433 |
) |
Net cash used in investing
activities |
|
|
(642,458 |
) |
|
|
(231,962 |
) |
|
|
(257,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in line of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300,000 |
) |
|
|
300,000 |
|
Costs of stock split or dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,647 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,393 |
|
|
|
331,313 |
|
Tax benefit of stock option exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,880 |
|
Repurchase and redemption of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,932,605 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(2,403,458 |
) |
|
|
(2,396,499 |
) |
|
|
(2,404,409 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(2,403,458 |
) |
|
|
(2,672,106 |
) |
|
|
(7,531,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase In Cash And Cash Equivalents |
|
|
2,489,145 |
|
|
|
578,305 |
|
|
|
(2,154,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash And Cash Equivalents At
Beginning Of Year |
|
|
1,253,947 |
|
|
|
675,642 |
|
|
|
2,830,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash And Cash Equivalents At End Of Year |
|
$ |
3,743,092 |
|
|
$ |
1,253,947 |
|
|
$ |
675,642 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
32
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. is an international franchiser, confectionery manufacturer
and retail operator in the United States, Canada, and the United Arab Emirates. The Company
manufactures an extensive line of premium chocolate candies and other confectionery products. The
Companys revenues are currently derived from three principal sources: sales to franchisees and
others of chocolates and other confectionery products manufactured by the Company; the collection
of initial franchise fees and royalties from franchisees sales; and sales at Company-owned stores
of chocolates and other confectionery products. The following table summarizes the number of Rocky
Mountain Chocolate Factory stores at February 28, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold, Not Yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open |
|
Open |
|
Total |
Company owned stores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Franchise stores Domestic stores |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
Franchise stores Domestic kiosks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Franchise stores International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Cold Stone Creamery Co-branded |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of six
months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the
credit quality of, the financial institutions with which it invests. As of the balance sheet date,
and periodically throughout the year, the Company has maintained balances in various operating
accounts in excess of federally insured limits. This amount was approximately $3,018,000 at
February 28, 2010.
Accounts and Notes Receivable
In the normal course of business, the Company extends credit to customers, primarily franchisees
that satisfy pre-defined credit criteria. The Company believes that it has limited concentration of
credit risk primarily because its receivables are secured by the assets of the franchisees to which
the Company ordinarily extends credit, including, but not limited to, their franchise rights and
inventories. An allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through analysis of the aging of
accounts receivable, assessments of collectability based on historical trends, and an evaluation of
the impact of current and projected economic conditions. The process by which the Company performs
its analysis is conducted on a customer by customer, or franchisee by franchisee, basis and takes
into account, among other relevant factors, sales history, outstanding receivables, customer
financial strength, as well as customer specific and geographic market factors relevant to
projected performance. The Company monitors the collectability of its accounts receivable on an
ongoing basis by assessing the credit worthiness of its customers and evaluating the impact of
reasonably likely changes in economic conditions that may impact credit risks. Estimates with
regard to the collectability of accounts receivable are reasonably likely to change in the future.
At February 28, 2010, the Company has $354,709 of notes receivable outstanding. The notes require
monthly payments and bear interest rates ranging from 6% to 8%. The notes mature through March 2012
and approximately $124,000 of notes receivable are secured by the assets financed.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in,
first-out method.
Property and Equipment and Other Assets
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the
straight-line method based upon the estimated useful life of the asset, which range from five to
thirty-nine years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the
lives of the respective leases or the service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
The Company reviews its long-lived assets through analysis of estimated fair value, including
identifiable intangible assets, whenever events or changes indicate the carrying amount of such
assets may not be recoverable. The Companys policy is to review the recoverability of all assets,
at a minimum, on an annual basis.
33
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
Income Taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the tax
basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements that will
result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. The Companys temporary differences are
listed in Note 6.
Goodwill
Goodwill arose from two transaction types. The first type was the result of the incorporation of
the Company after its inception as a partnership. The goodwill recorded was the excess of the
purchase price of the Company over the fair value of its assets. The Company has allocated this
goodwill equally between its Franchising and Manufacturing operations. The second type was the
purchase of various retail stores, either individually or as a group, for which the purchase price
was in excess of the fair value of the assets acquired.
The Company performs a goodwill impairment test on an annual basis or more frequently when events
or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit more likely than not exceeds
its fair value. Recoverability of goodwill is evaluated through comparison of the fair value of
each of our reporting units with its carrying value. To the extent that a reporting units carrying
value exceeds the implied fair value of its goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized. The Company
performed impairment testing with no impact to its financial results for the years ended February
28, 2010 and 2009.
Insurance and Self-Insurance Reserves
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance plans to provide for the potential
liabilities for workers compensation, general liability, property insurance, director and
officers liability insurance, vehicle liability and employee health care benefits. Liabilities
associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are estimated, in part, by considering
historical claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors and other assumptions. While
the Company believes that its assumptions are appropriate, the estimated accruals for these
liabilities could be significantly affected if future occurrences and claims differ from these
assumptions and historical trends.
Sales
Sales of products to franchisees and other customers are recognized at the time of delivery. Sales
of products at retail stores are recognized at the time of sale.
Shipping Fees
Shipping fees charged to customers by the Companys trucking department are reported as sales.
Shipping costs incurred by the Company for inventory are reported as cost of sales or inventory.
Franchise and Royalty Fees
Franchise fee revenue is recognized upon opening of the franchise store. In addition to the initial franchise fee, the Company also recognizes a
marketing and promotion fee of one percent (1%) of the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory franchised
stores gross retail sales and a royalty fee based on gross retail sales. Beginning with franchise
store openings in the third quarter of FY 2004, the Company modified its royalty structure. Under
the current structure, the Company recognizes no royalty on franchised stores retail sales of
products purchased from the Company and recognizes a ten percent (10%) royalty on all other sales
of product sold at franchise locations. For franchise stores opened prior to the third quarter of
FY 2004 the Company recognizes a royalty fee of five percent (5%) of franchised stores gross
retail sales.
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities,
at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Vulnerability Due to Certain Concentrations
As of February 28, 2010, the Company had a note receivable of approximately $124,000 due from one
franchisee. The note is collateralized by the underlying store assets. The Company is, therefore,
vulnerable to changes in the cash flow from this location.
34
NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES CONTINUED
Revenue from one customer of the Companys Manufacturing segment represented approximately $3.0
million or 11% of the Companys revenues during year ended February 28, 2010. The Companys future
results may be adversely impacted by a change in the purchases of this customer.
Stock-Based Compensation
At February 28, 2010, the Company had stock-based compensation plans for employees and nonemployee
directors which authorized the granting of stock awards.
The Company recognized $316,434, $240,013 and $58,355 related equity-based compensation expense
during the years ended February 28 or 29, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Compensation costs
related to share-based compensation are generally amortized over the vesting period.
On February 21, 2006, the Company accelerated the vesting of all outstanding stock options and
recognized a share-based compensation charge related to this acceleration. The Company recognized
an additional share-based compensation charge of $0, $11,240 and $25,158 for the years ended
February 28 or 29, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to this acceleration due to changes
in certain estimates and assumptions related to employee turnover since the acceleration date. Tax
benefits in excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock options are reported as financing
cash flows in the accompanying Statements of Cash Flows. The excess tax benefit included in net
cash provided by financing activities for the years ended February 28 or 29, 2010, 2009 and 2008
was $0, $0 and $183,880, respectively.
There were no stock options or restricted stock units granted to employees during FY 2010. During
FY 2009, the Company granted 170,400 shares of restricted common stock units with a grant date fair
value of $1,541,040 or $9.04 per share. The restricted stock unit grants vest 20% annually over a
period of five years. The Company recognized $295,235 of equity-based compensation expense related
to this grant during FY 2010 compared with $179,371 in FY 2009. Total unrecognized compensation
expense of non-vested, non-forfeited shares granted, as of February 28, 2010 was $992,708, which is
expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 3.4 years.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed as net earnings divided by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential
dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options. During 2010, 2009 and
2008, 124,896, 316,206, and 136,119, respectively, stock options were excluded from diluted shares
as their affect was anti-dilutive.
Advertising and Promotional Expenses
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Total advertising expense amounted to $225,460,
$221,715, and $261,663 for the fiscal years ended February 28 or 29, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables,
payables, and notes receivable. The fair value of all instruments approximates the carrying value.
NOTE 2 INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following at February 28:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Ingredients and supplies |
|
$ |
1,945,626 |
|
|
$ |
2,461,020 |
|
Finished candy |
|
|
1,335,821 |
|
|
|
1,603,591 |
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
3,281,447 |
|
|
$ |
4,064,611 |
|
35
NOTE 3 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consists of the following at February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Land |
|
$ |
513,618 |
|
|
$ |
513,618 |
|
Building |
|
|
4,699,167 |
|
|
|
4,707,381 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
7,006,146 |
|
|
|
6,977,006 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
794,387 |
|
|
|
676,970 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
404,191 |
|
|
|
347,124 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
379,238 |
|
|
|
350,714 |
|
|
|
|
13,796,747 |
|
|
|
13,572,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
8,610,038 |
|
|
|
8,319,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
5,186,709 |
|
|
$ |
5,253,598 |
|
NOTE 4 LINE OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
Line of Credit
At February 28, 2010 the Company had a $5 million line of credit from a bank, collateralized by
substantially all of the Companys assets with the exception of the Companys retail store assets.
Draws may be made under the line at 75% of eligible accounts receivable plus 50% of eligible
inventories. Interest on borrowings is at prime less 50 basis points or at 5.0%, whichever is
greater (5.0% at February 28, 2010). At February 28, 2010, $5 million was available for borrowings
under the line of credit, subject to borrowing base limitations. Terms of the line require that the
line be rested (that is, that there be no outstanding balance) for a period of 30 consecutive days
during the term of the loan. Additionally, the line of credit is subject to various financial ratio
and leverage covenants. At February 28, 2010 the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
The credit line is subject to renewal in July, 2010.
NOTE 5 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating leases
The Company conducts its retail operations in facilities leased under five to ten-year
noncancelable operating leases. Certain leases contain renewal options for between five and ten
additional years at increased monthly rentals. The majority of the leases provide for contingent
rentals based on sales in excess of predetermined base levels.
The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental
payments required under such leases for the years ending
February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
404,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
321,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
332,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
290,000 |
|
2015 |
|
|
157,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
154,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,658,000 |
|
In some instances, in order to retain the right to site selection or because of requirements
imposed by the lessor, the Company has leased space for its proposed franchise outlets. When a
franchise was sold, the store was subleased to the franchisee who is responsible for the monthly
rent and other obligations under the lease. The Companys liability as primary lessee on sublet
franchise outlets, all of which is offset by sublease rentals, is as follows for the years ending
February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
121,600 |
|
2012 |
|
|
125,300 |
|
2013 |
|
|
129,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
132,300 |
|
2015 |
|
|
136,900 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
227,800 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
872,900 |
|
36
NOTE 5 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES CONTINUED
The following is a schedule of lease expense for all retail operating leases for the three years
ended February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Minimum rentals |
|
$ |
404,191 |
|
|
$ |
340,612 |
|
|
$ |
336,859 |
|
Less sublease rentals |
|
|
(69,700 |
) |
|
|
(87,300 |
) |
|
|
(100,900 |
) |
Contingent rentals |
|
|
18,300 |
|
|
|
16,806 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
$ |
352,791 |
|
|
$ |
270,118 |
|
|
$ |
258,435 |
|
In FY 2008 the Company entered into an operating lease for warehouse space in the immediate
vicinity of its manufacturing operation. The following is a schedule, by year, of future minimum
rental payments required under such lease for the years ending February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
113,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
117,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
121,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
31,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
382,000 |
|
The Company also leases trucking equipment under operating leases. The following is a schedule by
year of future minimum rental payments required under such leases for the years ending February 28
or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
189,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
141,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
141,000 |
|
2014 |
|
|
82,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
553,000 |
|
The following is a schedule of lease expense for trucking equipment operating leases for the three
years ended February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
209,094 |
|
|
|
213,417 |
|
|
|
222,682 |
|
Purchase contracts
The Company frequently enters into purchase contracts of between six to eighteen months for
chocolate and certain nuts. These contracts permit the Company to purchase the specified commodity
at a fixed price on an as-needed basis during the term of the contract. Because prices for these
products may fluctuate, the Company may benefit if prices rise during the terms of these contracts,
but it may be required to pay above-market prices if prices fall and it is unable to renegotiate
the terms of the contract. Currently the Company has contracted for approximately $2 million of
raw materials under such agreements.
Contingencies
The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
Management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a significant adverse effect
on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense is comprised of the following for the years ending February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
1,801,479 |
|
|
$ |
1,927,612 |
|
|
$ |
2,435,496 |
|
State |
|
|
314,312 |
|
|
|
283,540 |
|
|
|
467,342 |
|
Total Current |
|
|
2,115,791 |
|
|
|
2,211,152 |
|
|
|
2,902,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(22,603 |
) |
|
|
(93,862 |
) |
|
|
131,776 |
|
State |
|
|
(2,720 |
) |
|
|
(11,318 |
) |
|
|
19,166 |
|
Total Deferred |
|
|
(25,323 |
) |
|
|
(105,180 |
) |
|
|
150,942 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,090,468 |
|
|
$ |
2,105,972 |
|
|
$ |
3,053,780 |
|
37
NOTE 6
INCOME TAXES CONTINUED
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective rate as a percentage of
pretax income is as follows for the years ending February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Statutory rate |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Effective Rate |
|
|
36.9 |
% |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
The components of deferred income taxes at February 28 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and notes |
|
$ |
150,606 |
|
|
$ |
126,766 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
100,535 |
|
|
|
95,982 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
189,579 |
|
|
|
118,555 |
|
Loss provisions and deferred income |
|
|
34,290 |
|
|
|
34,290 |
|
Self insurance accrual |
|
|
20,529 |
|
|
|
27,893 |
|
Amortization, design costs |
|
|
88,465 |
|
|
|
81,558 |
|
|
|
|
584,004 |
|
|
|
485,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,017,184 |
) |
|
|
(943,547 |
) |
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
1,017,184 |
) |
|
$ |
(943,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
461,249 |
|
|
$ |
369,197 |
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(894,429 |
) |
|
|
(827,700 |
) |
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
(433,180 |
) |
|
$ |
(458,503 |
) |
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and various state taxing
jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal and state tax
examinations in its major tax jurisdictions for periods before FY 2005.
Realization of the Companys deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company generating
sufficient taxable income, in the appropriate tax jurisdictions, in future years to obtain benefit
from the reversal of net deductible temporary differences. The amount of deferred tax assets
considered realizable is subject to adjustment in future periods if estimates of future taxable
income are changed. Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will
realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets as of February 28, 2010.
The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes by recognizing the tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained
on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The
Company measures the tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position based
on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate
resolution. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. As such, the Company is
required to make judgments regarding income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance
surrounding income tax law and regulations change over time and may result in changes to the
Companys judgments which can materially affect amounts recognized in the balance sheets and
statements of operations. The result of the assessment of the Companys tax positions did not have
an impact on the financial statements for the years ended February 28, 2010 or 2009. The Companys
federal tax returns for all years after 2006 and the Companys state tax returns after 2005 are
subject to future examination by tax authorities for all of the Companys tax jurisdictions. The
Company does not have any significant unrecognized tax benefits and does not anticipate a
significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.
Amounts are recognized for income tax related interest and penalties as a component of general and
administrative expense in the statement of income and are immaterial for years ended February 28,
2010 or 2009.
NOTE 7 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Stock Issuance
In September 2008 the Company issued 250 shares of stock valued at $2,323 for franchise recognition
at the Companys National Convention.
38
NOTE 7 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY CONTINUED
Shareholder Rights Plan
On May 19, 2009, the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. entered into an Amended and
Restated Shareholder Rights Agreement (Rights Agreement) which amended and restated the existing
Shareholder Rights Agreement dated May 28, 1999, (Existing Rights Plan). In connection with the
Existing Rights Plan the Companys board of directors declared a dividend of one right to purchase
one one-hundredth of a share of the Companys Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par
value $0.10 per share, for each outstanding share of the Companys common stock, par value $0.03
per share, of the Company that was outstanding on May 28, 1999. Each share of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock originally entitled the holder to one hundred votes and dividends
equal to one hundred times the aggregate per share amount of dividends declared per common share.
There are no shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock outstanding. The Existing
Rights Plan was set to expire on May 28, 2009 and, through board declaration, was replaced in its
entirety on May 18, 2009 when the Board of Directors of the Company authorized and declared a
dividend of one Right (a Right) for each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company (the
Common Shares). The dividend is payable on May 19, 2009 (the Record Date) to the holders of
record of the Common Shares at the close of business on that date. The Rights will become
exercisable and detachable only following the earlier of 10 days following a public announcement
that a person or group has acquired beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of the outstanding
Common Shares or 10 business days following the announcement of a tender offer or exchange offer
for 15 percent or more of the outstanding Common Shares. In addition, the Company has authorized
the issuance of one Right with respect to each share of Common Stock that shall become outstanding
between the Record Date and the earliest of the Distribution Date, the Redemption Date and the
Final Expiration Date. When exercisable each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase from
the Company one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par
value $0.10 per share, of the Company (the Preferred Shares), at a price of $30 per one
one-thousandth of a Preferred Share (the Purchase Price), subject to adjustment. Each share of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock entitles the holder to one thousand votes and
dividends equal to one thousand times the aggregate per share amount of dividends declared per
common share.
Stock Repurchases
Between January 9, 2008 and February 8, 2008, the Company repurchased 391,600 shares at an average
price of $11.94. Between August 15, 2007 and August 28, 2007, the Company repurchased 16,000 shares
at an average price of $15.96 per share. Between March 1, 2007 and May 15, 2007 the Company
repurchased 76,335 shares at an average price of $13.12 per share.
Cash Dividend
The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0857 per common share on March 16, 2007 to
shareholders of record on March 2, 2007. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.0952 per
common share on June 15, 2007 to shareholders of record on June 1, 2007. The Company paid a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.0950 per common share on September 14, 2007 to shareholders of record
on September 4, 2007. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per common share on
December 14, 2007 and March 14, 2008 to shareholders of record on December 3, 2007 and February 29,
2008. The Company paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per common share on June 13, 2008,
September 12, 2008, December 12, 2008 and March 13, 2009 to shareholders of record on June 2, 2008,
September 2, 2008, December 1, 2008 and February 27, 2009, respectively. The Company paid a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per common share on June 12, 2009, September 18, 2009, December
11, 2009 and March 12, 2010 to shareholders of record on June 1, 2009, September 8, 2009, November
30, 2009 and February 26, 2010, respectively.
Future declaration of dividends will depend on, among other things, the Companys results of
operations, capital requirements, financial condition and on such other factors as the Companys
Board of Directors may in its discretion consider relevant and in the best long term interest of
the shareholders.
NOTE 8 STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
In FY 2008 shareholders approved the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan). The 2007 Plan
allows awards of stock options; stock appreciation rights; stock awards, restricted stock, and
stock units; performance shares and performance units; other stock or cash based awards. As of
February 28, 2010, 170,400 restricted stock units and 8,000 unrestricted shares have been awarded
under the 2007 Plan and 248,643 shares of common stock is available for award under the plan
consisting of 300,000 shares originally authorized, 85,340 previously reserved for issuance under
earlier plans and 41,703 shares forfeited under the 2007 Plan and suspended plans, less shares
awarded under the Plan.
39
NOTE 8 STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS CONTINUED
Under the 1995 Stock Option Plan (the 1995 Plan), the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the 2004 Plan)the
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the Directors Plan) and the 2000
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the 2000 Directors Plan), options to
purchase up to 970,200, 441,000, 279,720 and 299,060 shares, respectively, of the Companys common
stock were previously authorized to be granted at prices not less than market value at the date of
grant. Options granted may not have a term exceeding ten years under the 1995 plan, the 2004 plan
and the Directors Plan. Options granted may not have a term exceeding five years under the 2000
Directors Plan. Options representing the right to purchase 67,420, 271,236, 0 and 29,106 shares of
the Companys common stock were outstanding under the 1995 Plan, the 2004 Plan, the Directors
Plan, and the 2000 Directors Plan, respectively, at February 28, 2010. On February 21, 2006, the
Company accelerated the vesting of all outstanding stock options in order to prevent past option
grants from having an impact on future results. The options outstanding under these plans will
expire, if not exercised through February 2016.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model utilizing the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2.60 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
4.69 |
% |
Expected life of options |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
5 years |
Information with respect to stock awards outstanding under the Plans at February 28, 2010,
and changes for the three years then ended was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
371,437 |
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
$ |
17.83 |
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
367,762 |
|
|
$ |
9.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at February 28, 2010 |
|
|
367,762 |
|
|
$ |
9.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
400,129 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(4,689 |
) |
|
|
5.20 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(24,003 |
) |
|
|
11.67 |
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
371,437 |
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at February 28, 2009 |
|
|
371,437 |
|
|
$ |
10.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
440,041 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
Granted |
|
|
12,936 |
|
|
|
13.16 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(45,813 |
) |
|
|
7.23 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,035 |
) |
|
|
18.69 |
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
400,129 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at February 29, 2008 |
|
|
400,129 |
|
|
$ |
10.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value per share
of options granted during 2010, 2009
and 2008 were $0 , $0 and $2.69
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional information about stock options outstanding at February 28, 2010 is summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted average remaining |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
Range of exercise prices |
|
exercisable |
|
|
contractual life |
|
|
exercise price |
|
$1.527 to $3.748 |
|
|
67,420 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
$ |
3.35 |
|
$7.408 to $7.415 |
|
|
174,636 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
$ |
7.41 |
|
$13.162 to $20.571 |
|
|
125,706 |
|
|
|
4.84 |
|
|
$ |
16.95 |
|
40
NOTE 9 OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Company classifies its business interests into two reportable segments: Franchising and
Manufacturing. The Company has eleven Company-owned stores. Company-owned stores provide an
environment for testing new products and promotions, operating and training methods and
merchandising techniques. Company management evaluates these stores in relation to their
contribution to franchising efforts. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. The Company evaluates
performance and allocates resources based on operating contribution, which excludes unallocated
corporate general and administrative costs, provision for loss on accounts and income tax expense
or benefit. The Companys reportable segments are strategic businesses that utilize common
merchandising, distribution, and marketing functions, as well as common information systems and
corporate administration. All inter-segment sales prices are market based. Each segment is
managed separately because of the differences in required infrastructure and the difference in
products and services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchising |
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
FY 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
8,318,282 |
|
|
$ |
22,087,355 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,405,637 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,969,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,969,089 |
) |
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
8,318,282 |
|
|
|
20,118,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,436,548 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
2,660,216 |
|
|
|
5,666,968 |
|
|
|
(2,656,639 |
) |
|
|
5,670,545 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
3,273,153 |
|
|
|
10,163,829 |
|
|
|
5,482,932 |
|
|
|
18,919,914 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
283,541 |
|
|
|
152,644 |
|
|
|
62,647 |
|
|
|
498,832 |
|
Total
depreciation & amortization |
|
|
176,576 |
|
|
|
342,943 |
|
|
|
179,061 |
|
|
|
698,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
7,966,207 |
|
|
|
22,160,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,126,397 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,587,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,587,698 |
) |
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
7,966,207 |
|
|
|
20,572,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,538,699 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
2,977,855 |
|
|
|
5,586,950 |
|
|
|
(2,740,270 |
) |
|
|
5,824,535 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,817,399 |
|
|
|
11,068,874 |
|
|
|
2,876,282 |
|
|
|
16,762,555 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
88,099 |
|
|
|
87,823 |
|
|
|
80,112 |
|
|
|
256,034 |
|
Total
depreciation & amortization |
|
|
162,049 |
|
|
|
391,803 |
|
|
|
204,470 |
|
|
|
758,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
8,119,957 |
|
|
$ |
25,531,054 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,651,011 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772,828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772,828 |
) |
Revenue from external customers |
|
|
8,119,957 |
|
|
|
23,758,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,878,183 |
|
Segment profit (loss) |
|
|
3,416,155 |
|
|
|
7,190,535 |
|
|
|
(2,591,534 |
) |
|
|
8,015,156 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,341,722 |
|
|
|
11,494,058 |
|
|
|
2,311,680 |
|
|
|
16,147,460 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
25,835 |
|
|
|
415,377 |
|
|
|
137,221 |
|
|
|
578,433 |
|
Total
depreciation & amortization |
|
|
186,865 |
|
|
|
410,660 |
|
|
|
185,426 |
|
|
|
782,951 |
|
Revenue from one customer of the Companys Manufacturing segment represents approximately
$3.0 million of the Companys revenues from external customers during year ended February 28, 2010.
NOTE 10 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For the three years ended February 28 or 29:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,851 |
|
|
$ |
1,566 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
1,807,705 |
|
|
|
2,111,568 |
|
|
|
2,950,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend payable |
|
$ |
3,708 |
|
|
$ |
(487 |
) |
|
$ |
47,740 |
|
Issue stock for rights and services |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets received upon
settlement of notes and accounts
receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store assets |
|
|
63,101 |
|
|
|
19,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company has a 401(k) plan called the Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. 401(k) Plan.
Eligible participants are permitted to make contributions up to statutory limits. The Company makes
a matching contribution, which vests ratably over a 3-year period, and is 25% of the employees
contribution up to a maximum of 1.5% of the employees compensation. During the years ended
February 28 or 29, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Companys contribution was approximately $62,000,
$35,000, and $46,000, respectively, to the plan.
41
NOTE 12 SUMMARIZED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)
Following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the fiscal years ended February
28, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
6,669,187 |
|
|
$ |
6,086,905 |
|
|
$ |
6,881,354 |
|
|
$ |
8,799,102 |
|
|
$ |
28,436,548 |
|
Gross margin before
depreciation |
|
|
1,778,958 |
|
|
|
1,739,218 |
|
|
|
1,991,536 |
|
|
|
2,523,683 |
|
|
|
8,033,395 |
|
Net income |
|
|
747,749 |
|
|
|
882,327 |
|
|
|
749,963 |
|
|
|
1,200,038 |
|
|
|
3,580,077 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
.12 |
|
|
|
.15 |
|
|
|
.12 |
|
|
|
.20 |
|
|
|
.60 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
.12 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.12 |
|
|
|
.19 |
|
|
|
.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Quarter |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
7,060,475 |
|
|
$ |
6,289,515 |
|
|
$ |
7,443,796 |
|
|
$ |
7,744,913 |
|
|
$ |
28,538,699 |
|
Gross margin before
depreciation |
|
|
1,753,331 |
|
|
|
1,572,324 |
|
|
|
1,897,811 |
|
|
|
2,152,556 |
|
|
|
7,376,022 |
|
Net income |
|
|
1,003,973 |
|
|
|
832,942 |
|
|
|
842,004 |
|
|
|
1,039,644 |
|
|
|
3,718,563 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
.62 |
|
Dilute earnings per share |
|
|
.16 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
.17 |
|
|
|
.60 |
|
NOTE 13 GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following at February 28:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store design |
|
10 Years |
|
|
|
205,777 |
|
|
|
169,535 |
|
|
|
205,777 |
|
|
|
148,425 |
|
Packaging licenses |
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
|
120,830 |
|
|
|
119,164 |
|
|
|
120,830 |
|
|
|
114,164 |
|
Packaging design |
|
10 Years |
|
|
|
430,973 |
|
|
|
358,856 |
|
|
|
430,973 |
|
|
|
311,856 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
757,580 |
|
|
|
647,555 |
|
|
|
757,580 |
|
|
|
574,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchising segment- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company stores goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099,328 |
|
|
|
267,020 |
|
|
|
1,099,328 |
|
|
|
267,020 |
|
Franchising goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
Manufacturing segment-Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
197,682 |
|
Trademark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,709,328 |
|
|
|
662,384 |
|
|
|
1,709,328 |
|
|
|
662,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,466,908 |
|
|
$ |
1,309,939 |
|
|
$ |
2,466,908 |
|
|
$ |
1,236,829 |
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets totaled $73,111, $73,111, and $73,111
during the fiscal year ended February 28 or 29, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The aggregate estimated
amortization expense for intangible assets remaining as of February 28, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
64,400 |
|
2012 |
|
|
40,200 |
|
2013 |
|
|
4,700 |
|
2014 |
|
|
725 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
110,025 |
|
NOTE 14 STORE PURCHASE
Effective August 1, 2008 the Company took possession of a previously financed franchise store and
related inventory in satisfaction of $110,289 of notes, accrued interest, and accounts receivable.
The Company currently intends to retain and operate the store. The following table summarizes the
allocation of the purchase price:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets received upon settlement
of note, accrued interest, and accounts
receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store assets |
|
$ |
19,021 |
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
3,398 |
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
87,870 |
|
Total fair value of business combination |
|
$ |
110,289 |
|
42
NOTE 15
ASSETS ACQUIRED FROM FRANCHISEES
During the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 the Company took possession of assets related
to four previously franchise operated stores in satisfaction of $91,113 of accounts receivable.
The Company currently intends to retain and operate these stores
NOTE 16 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105-10, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which replaces FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS No. 162 identified the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in preparing financial
statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. It arranged these sources of GAAP in a
hierarchy for users to apply. ASC 105-10 contents carry the same level of authority, effectively
superseding SFAS No. 162. Thus, the GAAP hierarchy will be modified to include only two levels of
GAAP: authoritative and non-authoritative. ASC 105-10 is effective for financial statements issued
for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 105-10 did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Limitations on Controls and Procedures Because of their inherent limitations, disclosure controls
and procedures and internal control over financial reporting (collectively, Control Systems) may
not prevent or detect all failures or misstatements of the type sought to be avoided by Control
Systems. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the Companys Control Systems
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(the CFO), does not expect that the Companys Control Systems will prevent all error or all
fraud. A Control System, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the Control System are met. Further, the design of a
Control System must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
Control Systems, no evaluation can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These reports by management, including the
CEO and CFO, on the effectiveness of the Companys Control Systems express only reasonable
assurance of the conclusions reached.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act)) that are designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known
to the officers who certify the Companys financial reports and to other members of senior
management and the Board of Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys reports that are filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act, are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers,
or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of
February 28, 2010, of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation,
the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of February 28, 2010.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Management is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Companys internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed under supervision of the Companys principal executive
officer and principal financial officer to provide reasonable assurance
43
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of the Companys financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness, as of
February 28, 2010, of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. In making this
evaluation, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission in its publication Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on that
evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of February 28, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by
paragraph (d) of Section 240.13a-15 of the Exchange Act that occurred during the Companys last
fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not
subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the
SEC that permit the Company to provide only managements report in this Annual Report.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Certain information with respect to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in the
section entitled Executive Officers in Part I of this report.
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 28, 2010 under the caption Election
of Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance and
is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 28, 2010 is under the caption
Executive Compensation and is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 28, 2009 under the caption Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters is
incorporated herein by this reference.
The following table provides information with respect to the Companys equity compensation plans as
of February 28, 2010.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities to be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issued upon exercise |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
of outstanding |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
securities |
|
|
|
options, warrants and |
|
|
outstanding options, |
|
|
remaining available |
|
|
|
Plan category |
|
rights |
|
|
warrants and rights |
|
|
for future issuance |
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
497,042 |
|
|
$ |
7.34 |
|
|
|
248,643 |
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
Total |
|
|
497,042 |
|
|
$ |
7.34 |
|
|
|
248,643 |
|
44
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for
our Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 28, 2010 is under the caption
Certain Transactions is incorporated herein by this reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item will be set forth in our Definitive Proxy Statement for our
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed no later than June 28, 2010 is under the caption
Principal Accountant Fees and Services is incorporated herein by this reference.
45
PART IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS and FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) |
|
The following documents are filed as part of this report: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Income |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements |
|
|
33 |
|
|
2. |
|
Financial Statement Schedule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
SCHEDULE II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
46 |
|
SCHEDULE II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Additions Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of |
|
|
|
Beginning of Period |
|
|
to Costs & Exp. |
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
Period |
|
Year Ended February 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance for
Accounts and Notes
Receivable |
|
|
332,719 |
|
|
|
220,000 |
|
|
|
157,428 |
|
|
|
395,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance for
Accounts and Notes
Receivable |
|
|
114,271 |
|
|
|
219,000 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
332,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended February 29, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance for
Accounts and Notes
Receivable |
|
|
187,519 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
148,248 |
|
|
|
114,271 |
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the year
ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of
the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 3.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K of the
Registrant filed December
14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock
Certificate
|
|
Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Business Loan Agreement dated
July 31, 2008 between Wells
Fargo Bank and the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended August
31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1**
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement
between the Registrant and its
officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Airport Development Agreement
between The Grove, Inc. and the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended November
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Current form of franchise
agreement used by the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended May 31,
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4**
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan of
the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-145986) filed on
September 11, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5**
|
|
Form of Indemnification
Agreement between the
Registrant and its directors
|
|
Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6**
|
|
Form of Indemnification
Agreement between the
Registrant and its officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7**
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan of the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.9 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-62149) filed August 25,
1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8**
|
|
Forms of Incentive Stock Option
Agreement for 1995 Stock Option
Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.10 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-62149) filed on August
25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9**
|
|
Forms of Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement for 1995 Stock
Option Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.11 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-62149) filed on August
25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10**
|
|
2000 Nonqualified Stock Option
Plan for Nonemployee Directors
Of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-109936 filed on October
23, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11**
|
|
2004 Stock Option Plan of the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-119107) filed September
17, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12*
|
|
Master License Agreement between
Kahala Franchise Corp. and the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended August
31, 2009. |
47
EXHIBIT INDEX continued
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
10.13*
|
|
Commodity Contract with
Guittard Chocolate Company
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
Test License Agreement between
Cold Stone Creamery, Inc. and
the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.14 to the
Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Registrant
for the fiscal year
ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Promissory Note dated July 31,
2009 in the amount of
$5,000,000 between Wells Fargo
Bank and the Registrant.
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the
quarter ended August
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Commercial Security Agreement
dated July 31, 2009 between
Wells Fargo Bank and the
Registrant.
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 to the
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the
quarter ended August
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith |
|
|
|
* |
|
Contains material that has been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment and such material has
been filed separately with the Commission. |
|
** |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan |
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHOCOLATE FACTORY, INC.
|
|
Date: May 18, 2010 |
|
/S/ Bryan J. Merryman
|
|
|
|
BRYAN J. MERRYMAN |
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Director |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 18, 2010 |
|
/S/ Franklin E. Crail
|
|
|
|
FRANKLIN E. CRAIL |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of
Directors, President, and
Director
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 18, 2010 |
|
/S/ Bryan J. Merryman
|
|
|
|
BRYAN J. MERRYMAN |
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Director
(principal financial and
accounting officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 18, 2010 |
|
/S/ Gerald A. Kien
|
|
|
|
GERALD A. KIEN, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 18, 2010 |
|
/S/ Lee N. Mortenson
|
|
|
|
LEE N. MORTENSON, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 18, 2010 |
|
/S/ Clyde Wm. Engle
|
|
|
|
CLYDE Wm. ENGLE, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 18, 2010 |
|
/S/ Scott G. Capdevielle
|
|
|
|
SCOTT G. CAPDEVIELLE, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
49
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant, as amended
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 to Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the year
ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of
the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 3.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K of the
Registrant filed December
14, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock
Certificate
|
|
Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Business Loan Agreement dated
July 31, 2008 between Wells
Fargo Bank and the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended August
31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1**
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement
between the Registrant and its
officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Airport Development Agreement
between The Grove, Inc. and the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended November
30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Current form of franchise
agreement used by the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended May 31,
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4**
|
|
2007 Equity Incentive Plan of
the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-145986) filed on
September 11, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5**
|
|
Form of Indemnification
Agreement between the
Registrant and its directors
|
|
Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6**
|
|
Form of Indemnification
Agreement between the
Registrant and its officers
|
|
Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the
Registrant for the fiscal
year ended February 28,
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7**
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan of the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.9 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-62149) filed August 25,
1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8**
|
|
Forms of Incentive Stock Option
Agreement for 1995 Stock Option
Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.10 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-62149) filed on August
25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9**
|
|
Forms of Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement for 1995 Stock
Option Plan
|
|
Exhibit 10.11 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Registration No.
33-62149) filed on August
25, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.10**
|
|
2000 Nonqualified Stock Option
Plan for Nonemployee Directors
Of the Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-109936 filed on October
23, 2003. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.11**
|
|
2004 Stock Option Plan of the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 99.1 to
Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-119107) filed September
17, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.12*
|
|
Master License Agreement between
Kahala Franchise Corp. and the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.3 to the
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for
the quarter ended August
31, 2009. |
EXHIBIT INDEX continued
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
Incorporated by Reference to |
10.13*
|
|
Commodity Contract with
Guittard Chocolate Company
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.14*
|
|
Test License Agreement between
Cold Stone Creamery, Inc. and
the
Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 10.14 to the
Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Registrant
for the fiscal year
ended February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Promissory Note dated July 31,
2009 in the amount of
$5,000,000 between Wells Fargo
Bank and the Registrant.
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 to the
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the
quarter ended August
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Commercial Security Agreement
dated July 31, 2009 between
Wells Fargo Bank and the
Registrant.
|
|
Exhibit 10.2 to the
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the
Registrant for the
quarter ended August
31, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Contains material that has been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment and such material has
been filed separately with the Commission. |
|
** |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan |