e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 1-13175
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
74-1828067
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
One Valero Way
San Antonio, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
78249
(Zip Code)
(210) 345-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants only class of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding
as of July 30, 2010 was 566,260,467.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars, Except Par Value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments |
|
$ |
2,001 |
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
888 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
Assets held for sale and assets related to discontinued operations |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
11,348 |
|
|
|
11,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
29,439 |
|
|
|
28,463 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(6,076 |
) |
|
|
(5,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
23,363 |
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
36,477 |
|
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
523 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion |
|
|
7,511 |
|
|
|
7,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,200,000,000 shares authorized;
673,501,593 and 673,501,593 shares issued |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,833 |
|
|
|
7,896 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 107,249,003 and 108,798,847 common shares |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
13,591 |
|
|
|
13,178 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
15,051 |
|
|
|
14,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
36,477 |
|
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Millions of Dollars, Except per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues (1) |
|
$ |
21,775 |
|
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
|
$ |
41,418 |
|
|
$ |
30,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
19,320 |
|
|
|
16,014 |
|
|
|
37,456 |
|
|
|
27,218 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
20,854 |
|
|
|
17,568 |
|
|
|
40,529 |
|
|
|
30,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
(in millions) |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
assuming dilution (in millions) |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
Dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes excise taxes on sales by our U.S. retail system |
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Gain on sale of Delaware City Refinery assets |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noncash interest expense and other income, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
Changes in current assets and current liabilities |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Changes in deferred charges and credits and other operating activities, net |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(785 |
) |
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(249 |
) |
Purchase of ethanol facilities |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(556 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of the Delaware City Refinery assets and associated
terminal and pipeline assets |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minor acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-bank debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(517 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
Accounts receivable sales program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of receivables |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(1,325 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net of issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
799 |
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee benefit plans |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
|
$ |
2,001 |
|
|
$ |
1,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss arising during the period, net of income
tax benefit of $, $, $, and $ |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain reclassified into income, net of income
tax expense of $, $, $, and $ |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on pension and other
postretirement benefits |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
designated and qualifying
as cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) arising during the period, net of income
tax (expense) benefit of $, $(2), $1, and $(34) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
Net gain reclassified into income, net of income
tax expense of $17, $39, $34, and $60 |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on cash flow hedges |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
(132 |
) |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION, PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION, AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
As used in this report, the terms Valero, we, us, or our may refer to Valero Energy
Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or all of them taken as a whole.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Valero and subsidiaries
in which Valero has a controlling interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in significant non-controlled entities are accounted for
using the equity method.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for
complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. Financial information for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 included in these Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements is derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. Operating results for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial
statements as of that date. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
We have evaluated subsequent events that occurred after June 30, 2010 through the filing of this
Form 10-Q. Any material subsequent events that occurred during this time have been properly
recognized or disclosed in our financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis,
we review our estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and
circumstances may result in revised estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
As discussed in Note 4, we permanently shut down our Delaware City Refinery in the fourth quarter
of 2009, and our board of directors approved a plan of sale for our shutdown refinery and associated terminal and pipeline assets at Delaware City in the first quarter of 2010. As a result, these assets
have been presented in the consolidated balance sheet as assets held for sale and assets of
discontinued operations as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. In addition, the results of
operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been presented as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of income for all periods presented.
7
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asset impairment losses have been presented on a separate line in the consolidated statements of
income. These asset impairment losses resulted from the cancellation of certain capital projects
classified as construction in progress, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
such losses have been reclassified from operating expenses and presented separately. The asset
impairment losses are also presented on a separate line in the consolidated statements of cash
flows, which resulted in an adjustment to changes in deferred charges and credits and other
operating activities, net previously reported for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Asset
impairment losses presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 includes asset impairment losses associated with the Delaware City Refinery, but such
losses are included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income.
2. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, Topic 860 of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC),
Transfers and Servicing, was modified to clarify the requirements for derecognizing transferred
financial assets, remove the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and related exceptions,
and require additional disclosures related to transfers of financial assets. This guidance was
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November
15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The adoption of these provisions of ASC Topic
860 effective January 1, 2010 did not affect our financial position or results of operations.
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, was amended to modify provisions related to variable
interest entities to include entities previously considered qualifying special-purpose entities, as
the concept of these entities was eliminated. This modification also clarifies consolidation
requirements and expands disclosure requirements related to variable interest entities. These
provisions of ASC Topic 810 were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The
adoption of these provisions of ASC Topic 810 effective January 1, 2010 did not affect our
financial position or results of operations.
3. ACQUISITIONS
The acquired ethanol businesses discussed below involve the production and marketing of ethanol and
its co-products, including distillers grains. The operations of our ethanol business complement
our existing clean motor fuels business.
Acquisitions of ASA and Renew Assets
In December 2009, we signed an agreement with ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC (ASA) to buy two ethanol
plants located in Linden, Indiana and Bloomingburg, Ohio and made a $20 million advance payment
towards the purchase of these facilities. On January 13, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the
facilities, including certain inventories, for a total purchase price of $202 million.
Also in December 2009, we received approval from a bankruptcy court to acquire an ethanol facility
located near Jefferson, Wisconsin from Renew Energy LLC (Renew) and made a $1 million advance
payment towards the purchase of this facility. We completed the acquisition of this facility,
including certain receivables and inventories, on February 4, 2010 for a total purchase price of
$79 million.
8
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assets acquired from ASA and Renew were recognized at acquisition-date fair values as
determined by independent appraisals and other evaluations as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, primarily inventory |
|
$ |
11 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
269 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration |
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither goodwill nor a gain from a bargain purchase was recognized in conjunction with the ASA and
Renew acquisitions, and no contingent assets or liabilities were acquired or assumed. In addition,
pro forma results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 have not been
presented for these acquisitions as the acquisitions were not material to our financial position or
results of operations. The consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2010
includes the results of the ASA and Renew acquisitions as of their acquisition dates in
the first quarter of 2010.
Acquisition of VeraSun Assets
In the second quarter of 2009, we acquired seven ethanol plants and a site under development from
VeraSun Energy Corporation (VeraSun). The acquisition of these ethanol plants (referred to as the
VeraSun Acquisition) was completed under three separate closing transactions. The purchase price
for the VeraSun Acquisition was $477 million plus $79 million primarily for inventory and certain
other working capital.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values
as determined by an independent appraisal and other evaluations as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, primarily inventory |
|
$ |
77 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
491 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
1 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration |
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither goodwill nor a gain from a bargain purchase was recognized in conjunction with the VeraSun
Acquisition, and no contingent assets or liabilities were acquired or assumed in the acquisition.
9
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The consolidated statements of income include the results of operations of the ethanol plants
commencing on their closing dates in the second quarter of 2009. Two of the acquired plants with closing dates
subsequent to April 1, 2009 were not operating at the time of acquisition. Therefore, pro forma information for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 is the same as our actual consolidated results of operations for that period.
The pro forma
information presented below for the six months ended June 30, 2009 assumes that the VeraSun Acquisition
occurred on January 1, 2009 and that the purchase price
was funded with proceeds from the issuance of $556 million of debt on January 1, 2009. The
consolidated pro forma operating revenues, net income, and earnings per common share assuming
dilution of the combined entity are shown in the table below (in millions, except per share amount).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pro forma: |
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
30,927 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
166 |
|
Earnings per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution |
|
|
0.32 |
|
4. SALE OF DELAWARE CITY REFINERY ASSETS AND ASSOCIATED TERMINAL AND PIPELINE ASSETS
On November 20, 2009, we announced the permanent shutdown of our Delaware City Refinery due to
financial losses caused by poor economic conditions, significant capital spending requirements, and
high operating costs. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.9 billion,
of which $1.4 billion represented the write-down of the book value of the refinery assets to net
realizable value. The results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been presented as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented because
of the permanent shutdown of the refinery. Certain terminal and pipeline assets previously
associated with the refinery were not shut down and continued to be operated until the date of
their sale. The results of their operations are reflected in continuing operations in the
consolidated statements of income for all periods presented due to our post-closing participation
in the terminalling agreement described below.
In the first quarter of 2010, our board of directors
approved a plan of sale for our shutdown refinery assets and associated terminal and
pipeline assets at Delaware City. Effective June 1, 2010, we sold these
assets to wholly owned subsidiaries of PBF Energy Partners LP (PBF) for $220 million of cash
proceeds. The sale resulted in a gain of $92 million related to the shutdown refinery assets and a
gain of $3 million related to the terminal and pipeline assets. The gain on the sale of the shutdown
refinery assets
primarily resulted from the scrap value of the assets and the reversal of certain liabilities
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the refinery, which we will not
incur because of the sale. This gain
is presented in income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
in the consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
The shutdown refinery assets and the associated terminal and pipeline assets were
presented in the consolidated balance sheets within assets held for sale as of December 31, 2009.
All other related assets and liabilities of the shutdown refinery that were not sold
are presented as assets and liabilities related to discontinued operations as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 summarized as follows (in millions).
10
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Related to |
|
|
|
|
Held |
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
for Sale |
|
Operations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Related to |
|
|
|
|
Held |
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
for Sale |
|
Operations |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Terminal and pipeline |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations for the Delaware City Refinery prior to its sale, excluding the gain on the
sale, are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
549 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
Loss before income tax benefit |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
11
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with this sale, we entered into a terminalling and offtake agreement with PBF under
which PBF will provide certain terminalling services including receipt, storage, handling, and
redelivery of refined products for us. If PBF resumes refinery operations, the terminalling
agreement will terminate and we have agreed to purchase certain off-take products as prescribed in the
agreement. The initial term of this agreement is for one year and shall automatically renew for
180-day periods until terminated by either party.
5. IMPAIRMENTS
Due to the economic slowdown that persisted throughout 2009 and its negative impact on the refining
industry, we evaluated our refining operating assets for potential impairment in 2009. Such
evaluations were based on expected future cash flows for each of our refineries using significant
estimates and assumptions about the future operations of those refineries, including overall
throughput volumes, types of crude oil processed, types of products produced, and prices for crude
oil and refined products. Prices for crude oil and refined products fluctuate significantly based
on market factors, including geopolitical matters. Prices, in turn, impact refinery throughput
assumptions. In addition, we considered strategic alternatives, including potential sales of our Aruba and Paulsboro Refineries to develop expected future cash flows for those refineries.
We determined that there was no indication of impairment of our refining operating assets
as of December 31, 2009.
While the economy and refining industry fundamentals improved during the first six months of 2010,
refining industry fundamentals continued to be negatively impacted by the economic slowdown. As a
result, we updated our evaluation of potential impairments of our refining operating assets as of
June 30, 2010, and we determined that there was no indication of impairment. Our cash flow
estimates are based on expected improvements in refined product prices resulting from
an expected improvement in the U.S. and worldwide economies. We updated our assumptions related to matters
specific to our Aruba and Paulsboro Refineries that impact their expected future cash flows, as
further discussed below, because the sensitivity of our estimates is most significant with respect
to those refineries. We believe that our estimates used to develop expected cash flows are
reasonable; however, future cash flows will differ from our estimates and such differences may be
material.
Our Aruba Refinery was shut down in July 2009 because narrow heavy sour crude oil differentials
made the refinery uneconomical to operate. In addition, various tax disputes with the
Government of Aruba (GOA) created uncertainties with respect to the future economics of the
refinery. As discussed in Note 15, we entered into a settlement agreement with the GOA on February
24, 2010, and that agreement became effective June 1, 2010. We also entered into a new tax regime
in Aruba effective June 1, 2010, which resolved uncertainties regarding the tax environment in
Aruba. In addition, heavy sour crude oil differentials began to widen in the first six months of
2010. Because of these positive developments, we commenced refinery-wide maintenance to
prepare the refinerys production units for potential restart by the end of the third
quarter of 2010. We considered these positive developments in our updated impairment evaluation of
the operating assets of the Aruba Refinery, and that evaluation indicated that there was no
impairment. However, future decisions regarding the timing of a restart of the refinery that
differ materially from our expectations or a decision to permanently shut down the refinery would
have a significant impact on our cash flow estimates, and we could determine that the refinerys
operating assets are impaired. The Aruba Refinery had a net book value of $1.1 billion as of June
30, 2010; therefore, an impairment loss could be material to our results of operations.
12
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have continued to evaluate strategic alternatives for our Paulsboro Refinery, and we entered
into negotiations related to a potential sale of the refinery in
the second quarter of 2010. Negotiations are proceeding, but there is no certainty that we will
sell the refinery. Our updated evaluation of a potential
impairment of the operating assets of the Paulsboro Refinery considered the possibility of selling
the refinery based on the facts and circumstances that existed as of June 30, 2010, and that
evaluation indicated that there was no impairment. The Paulsboro Refinery had a net book value of
$1.3
billion as of June 30, 2010; therefore, an impairment loss could be material to our results of operations.
For further information regarding impairments, see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery feedstocks |
|
$ |
2,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,124 |
|
Refined products and blendstocks |
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
Ethanol feedstocks and products |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Convenience store merchandise |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
4,767 |
|
|
$ |
4,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the replacement cost (market value) of LIFO inventories
exceeded their LIFO carrying amounts by approximately $4.3 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively.
7. DEBT
Non-Bank Debt
In March 2009, we issued $750 million of 9.375% notes due March 15, 2019 and $250 million of 10.5%
notes due March 15, 2039. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled $998 million, before
deducting underwriting discounts and other issuance costs of $8 million.
In April 2009, we made scheduled debt repayments of $200 million related to our 3.5% notes and $9
million related to our 5.125% Series 1997D industrial revenue bonds.
In February 2010, we issued $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February 2015 and $850 million of
6.125% notes due in February 2020. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled $1.244
billion, before deducting underwriting discounts and other issuance costs of $10 million.
In March 2010, we redeemed our 7.50% senior notes with a maturity date of June 15, 2015 for $294
million, or 102.5% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $296 million as of the
redemption date, resulting in a $2 million gain that was included in other income (expense)
in the consolidated statements of income.
13
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In April 2010, we made scheduled debt repayments of $8 million related to our Series A 5.45%,
Series B 5.40%, and Series C 5.40% industrial revenue bonds.
In May 2010, we redeemed our 6.75% senior notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2014 for $190
million, or 102.25% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $187 million as of the
redemption date, resulting in a $3 million dollar loss that was included in other income
(expense) in the consolidated statements of income.
In June 2010, we made scheduled debt repayments of $25 million related to our 7.25% debentures.
Bank Credit Facilities
We have a revolving credit facility (the Revolver) that has a maturity date of November 2012. As
of June 30, 2010, the Revolver had a borrowing capacity of $2.4 billion. The Revolver has certain
restrictive covenants, including a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60%. As of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, our debt-to-capitalization ratios, calculated in accordance with the
terms of the Revolver, were 28.6% and 30.9%, respectively. We believe that we will remain in
compliance with this covenant.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings or repayments under our Revolver or
other revolving bank credit facilities. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had no
borrowings outstanding under these committed revolving bank credit facilities.
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had $76 million and $259 million, respectively, of
letters of credit outstanding under our uncommitted short-term bank credit facilities and $225
million and $299 million, respectively, of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S. committed
revolving credit facilities. Under our Canadian committed revolving credit facility, we had Cdn.
$20 million and Cdn. $22 million of letters of credit outstanding as of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009 respectively.
In June 2010, we entered into a one-year committed revolving letter of credit facility under which
we may obtain letters of credit of up to $300 million to support certain of our crude oil
purchases. This agreement matures in June 2011.
Accounts Receivable Sales Facility
We have an accounts receivable sales facility with a group of third-party entities and financial
institutions to sell on a revolving basis up to $1 billion of eligible trade receivables. We
amended our agreement in June 2010 to extend the maturity date to June 2011. As of December 31,
2009, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $200 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we sold $1.2 billion of
eligible receivables and repaid $1.3
billion. As of June 30, 2010, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $100 million. Proceeds from the sale of receivables under this
facility are reflected as debt in our consolidated balance sheets.
14
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Disclosures
The estimated fair value of our debt, including the current portion, was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
$ |
7,996 |
|
|
$ |
7,364 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
9,360 |
|
|
|
8,228 |
|
8. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Treasury Stock
No significant purchases of our common stock were made during the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we issued 1.5 million shares and 0.5
million shares from treasury, respectively, for our employee benefit plans.
Common Stock Dividends
On July 29, 2010, our board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per
common share payable on September 15, 2010 to holders of record at the close of business on August
18, 2010.
Common Stock Offering
On June 3, 2009, we sold in a public offering 46 million shares of our common stock, which included
6 million shares related to an overallotment option exercised by the underwriters, at a price of
$18.00 per share and received proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other
issuance costs, of $799 million.
15
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings (loss) per common share amounts were computed as follows (dollars and shares in millions,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Common |
|
Restricted |
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(191 |
) |
Less dividends paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
Nonvested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings (loss) per common share
from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations
assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
Common equivalent shares (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance awards and unvested
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Common equivalent shares were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 because the effect of including such shares would be
antidilutive. |
16
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Common |
|
Restricted |
|
Common |
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
Less dividends paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
Nonvested restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
Undistributed earnings |
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings per common share from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520 |
|
Common equivalent shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Performance awards and unvested
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reflects potentially dilutive securities
(in millions) that were excluded from the
calculation of earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations assuming dilution
as the effect of including such securities would have been antidilutive. These potentially dilutive securities
included common equivalent shares (primarily stock options), which were excluded due to the loss from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and stock options for which the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares
during each respective reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equivalent shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
10. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
In order to determine net cash provided by operating activities, net income is adjusted by, among
other things, changes in current assets and current liabilities as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
Receivables, net |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
1,592 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in current assets and current liabilities |
|
$ |
613 |
|
|
$ |
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above changes in current assets and current liabilities differ from changes between amounts
reflected in the applicable consolidated balance sheets for the respective periods for the
following reasons:
|
|
|
the amounts shown above exclude changes in cash and temporary cash investments, deferred
income taxes, and current portion of debt and capital lease obligations, as well as the
effect of certain noncash investing and financing activities discussed below; |
|
|
|
|
amounts accrued for capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs are
reflected in investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows when such
amounts are paid; |
|
|
|
|
amounts accrued for common stock purchases in the open market that are not settled as of
the balance sheet date are reflected in financing activities in the consolidated statements
of cash flows when the purchases are settled and paid; |
|
|
|
|
changes in assets and liabilities related to the discontinued operations of the Delaware
City Refinery prior to its shutdown are reflected in the line items to which the changes
relate in the table above; and |
18
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
certain differences between consolidated balance sheet changes and consolidated
statement of cash flow changes reflected above result from translating foreign currency
denominated amounts at different exchange rates. |
There were no significant noncash investing or financing activities for the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009.
Cash flows related to interest and income taxes were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid in excess of amount capitalized |
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
Income taxes paid (received), net |
|
|
(797 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
Cash flows related to the discontinued operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been combined
with the cash flows from continuing operations within each category in the consolidated statements
of cash flows for both periods presented and are summarized as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
(134 |
) |
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
A fair value hierarchy (Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3) is used to categorize fair value amounts
based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value. Accordingly, fair values determined by
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair
values determined by Level 2 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include
situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. We use
appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of our
applicable assets and liabilities. When available, we measure fair value using Level 1 inputs
because they generally provide the most reliable evidence of fair value.
The tables below present information (dollars in millions) about our financial assets and
liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the fair value
hierarchy of the inputs utilized by us to determine the fair values as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
19
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
Total as of |
|
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
Nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
Total as of |
|
|
Markets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
December 31, |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
359 |
|
Nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Nonqualified benefit plans |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
The valuation methods used to measure our financial instruments at fair value are as follows:
|
|
|
Commodity derivative contracts, consisting primarily of exchange-traded futures and
swaps, are measured at fair value using the market approach. Exchange-traded futures are
valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy. Swaps are priced using third-party broker quotes, industry pricing
services, and exchange-traded curves, with appropriate consideration of counterparty credit
risk, but since they have contractual terms that are not identical to exchange-traded
futures instruments with a comparable market price, these financial instruments are
categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
|
|
|
|
The nonqualified benefit plan assets and nonqualified benefit plan liabilities
categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a
market approach based on quotations from national securities exchanges. The nonqualified
benefit plan assets categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy represent insurance
contracts, the fair value of which is provided by the insurer. |
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, cash received from brokers of $58 million and $64
million, respectively, resulting from the equity in broker accounts covered by master netting
arrangements exceeding the minimum margin requirements for such accounts, is netted against the
fair value of the commodity derivatives reflected in Level 1.
Certain of our commodity derivative
contracts under master netting arrangements include both asset and liability positions. We have
elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative instruments
executed with the same counterparty, including any related cash
collateral asset or obligation.
20
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances (in millions) for fair value
measurements developed using significant unobservable inputs for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Net unrealized gains included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, which are reported in other
income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of income, relate to the three-year earn-out
agreement with Alon Refining Krotz Springs Inc. (Alon) that was entered into in connection with the
sale of our Krotz Springs Refinery. That agreement was settled in August 2009. These unrealized
gains were offset by the recognition in other income (expense), net of losses on commodity derivative
instruments entered into to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of the Alon earn-out
agreement.
12. PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of commodities, interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we enter into derivative instruments to manage those
risks. We also enter into derivative instruments to manage the price risk on other contractual
derivatives into which we have entered. The only types of derivative instruments we enter into are
those related to the various commodities we purchase or produce, interest rate swaps, and foreign
currency exchange and purchase contracts, as described below. All derivative instruments are
recorded on our balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair values.
When we enter into a derivative instrument, it is designated as a fair value hedge, a cash flow
hedge, an economic hedge, or a trading activity. The gain or loss on a derivative instrument
designated and qualifying as a fair value hedge, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the
hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized currently in income in the same period.
The effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as
a cash flow hedge is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and is then
recorded in income in the period or periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects
income. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the cash flow derivative instrument, if
any, is recognized in income as incurred. For our economic hedging relationships (hedges not
designated as fair value or cash flow hedges) and for derivative instruments entered into by us for
trading purposes, the derivative instrument is recorded at fair value and changes in the fair value
of the derivative instrument are recognized currently in income. The cash flow effects of all of
our derivative contracts are reflected in operating activities in the consolidated statements of
cash flows for both periods presented.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily
gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), and natural gas used in our refining operations.
To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we use
commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options. We use the futures
markets for the available liquidity, which
21
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations. We use swaps
primarily to convert our floating price exposure to a fixed price. Our positions in commodity
derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure
compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors.
For risk management purposes, we use fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, and economic hedges. In
addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk, we also enter into
certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes. Our objective for entering into
each type of hedge or trading activity is described below.
Fair Value Hedges
Fair value hedges are used to hedge certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase
inventories. The level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our
operating inventories, and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our
previous year-end LIFO inventory levels.
As of June 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories. The information presents the
notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes in
thousands of barrels).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Contract |
|
|
Volumes by |
Derivative Instrument |
|
Year of Maturity |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil and refined products: |
|
|
|
|
Futures - short |
|
|
17,796 |
|
Cash Flow Hedges
Cash flow hedges are used to hedge certain forecasted feedstock and refined product purchases, refined
product sales, and natural gas purchases. The objective of our cash flow hedges is to lock in the
price of forecasted feedstock, refined product or natural gas purchases or refined product sales at
existing market prices that we deem favorable.
As of June 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into to hedge forecasted purchases or sales of crude oil and refined products. The
information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of
maturity (volumes in thousands of barrels).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Contract |
|
|
Volumes by |
Derivative Instrument |
|
Year of Maturity |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil and refined products: |
|
|
|
|
Swaps - long |
|
|
21,300 |
|
Swaps - short |
|
|
21,300 |
|
22
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Economic Hedges
Economic hedges are hedges not designated as fair value or cash flow hedges that are used to (i)
manage price volatility in certain refinery feedstock, refined product and corn inventories, and
(ii) manage price volatility in certain forecasted refinery feedstock, refined product and corn purchases,
refined product sales, and natural gas purchases. Our objective in entering into economic hedges
is consistent with the objectives discussed above for fair value hedges and cash flow hedges.
However, the economic hedges are not designated as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge for
accounting purposes, usually due to the difficulty of establishing the required documentation at
the date that the derivative instrument is entered into that would allow us to achieve hedge
deferral accounting.
As of June 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into as economic hedges. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding
contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes in thousands of barrels, except those
identified as corn contracts that are presented in thousands of bushels).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Contract Volumes by |
Derivative Instrument |
|
Year of Maturity |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil and refined products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps - long |
|
|
120,048 |
|
|
|
83,017 |
|
Swaps - short |
|
|
118,363 |
|
|
|
83,005 |
|
Futures - long |
|
|
334,198 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
Futures - short |
|
|
327,138 |
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
Corn: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures - long |
|
|
24,535 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Futures - short |
|
|
49,305 |
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
23
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Trading Activities
Derivatives entered into for trading purposes represent commodity derivative instruments held or
issued for trading purposes. Our objective in entering into commodity derivative instruments for
trading purposes is to take advantage of existing market conditions related to crude oil and
refined products that we perceive as opportunities to benefit our results of operations
and cash flows, but for which there are no related physical transactions.
As of June 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that were
entered into for trading purposes. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding
contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes represent thousands of barrels,
except those identified as natural gas contracts that are presented in billions of British thermal
units).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Contract Volumes by |
Derivative Instrument |
|
Year of Maturity |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil and refined products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps - long |
|
|
29,809 |
|
|
|
9,720 |
|
Swaps - short |
|
|
29,384 |
|
|
|
9,720 |
|
Futures - long |
|
|
50,291 |
|
|
|
3,296 |
|
Futures - short |
|
|
50,602 |
|
|
|
3,079 |
|
Options - long |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options - short |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures - long |
|
|
3,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
Futures - short |
|
|
3,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary market risk exposure for changes in interest rates relates to our debt obligations. We
manage our exposure to changing interest rates through the use of a combination of fixed-rate and
floating-rate debt. In addition, at times we have used interest rate swap agreements to manage our
fixed to floating interest rate position by converting certain fixed-rate debt to floating-rate
debt. These interest rate swap agreements are generally accounted for as fair value hedges.
However, we have not had any outstanding interest rate swap agreements since 2006.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations on transactions related to our Canadian operations.
To manage our exposure to these exchange rate fluctuations, we use foreign currency exchange and
purchase contracts. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting
purposes, and therefore they are classified as economic hedges. As of June 30, 2010, we had
commitments to purchase $325 million of U.S. dollars. These commitments matured on or before July
30, 2010.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The following tables provide information about the fair values of our derivative instruments as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in millions) and the line items in the balance sheet in which
the fair values are reflected. See Note 11 for additional information related to the fair values
of our derivative instruments. As indicated in Note 11, we net fair value amounts recognized for
multiple similar derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under master netting
arrangements. The
24
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
tables below, however, are presented on a gross asset and gross liability basis, which results in
the reflection of certain assets in liability accounts and certain liabilities in asset accounts.
In addition, in Note 11, we netted cash collateral received from brokers against the fair value of
the commodity derivatives; these cash amounts are not reflected in the tables below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
June 30, |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
June 30, |
|
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
6 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
442 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
520 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
114 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
101 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
153 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
70 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
21 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
3,061 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
276 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
195 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
638 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
645 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
11 |
|
Options |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
4,143 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
4,864 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
December 31, |
|
Balance Sheet |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
Location |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
2 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
13 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
37 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
308 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
271 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
579 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
415 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
28 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives
designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
29 |
|
Futures |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
2,101 |
|
Swaps |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
506 |
|
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
370 |
|
Swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
1,037 |
|
Swaps |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
46 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
62 |
|
Options |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not
designated
as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
3,729 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
4,658 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market and Counterparty Risk
Our price risk management activities involve the receipt or payment of fixed price commitments into
the future. These transactions give rise to market risk, which is the risk that future changes in market
conditions may make an instrument less valuable. We closely monitor and manage our exposure to
market risk on a daily basis in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors.
Market risks are monitored by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk
management policy. Concentrations of customers in the refining industry may impact our overall
exposure to counterparty risk because these customers may be similarly affected by changes in
economic or other conditions. In addition, financial services companies are the counterparties in
certain of our price risk management activities, and such financial services companies may be
adversely affected by periods of uncertainty and illiquidity in the credit and capital markets.
As of June 30, 2010, we had net receivables related to derivative instruments of $11 million from
counterparties in the refining industry and $65 million from counterparties in the financial
services industry. As of December 31, 2009, we had net receivables related to derivative
instruments of $19 million from counterparties in the refining industry and $157 million from
counterparties in the
26
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial services industry. These amounts represent the aggregate amount payable to us by
companies in those industries, reduced by payables from us to those companies under master netting
arrangements that allow for the setoff of amounts receivable from and payable to the same party.
We do not require any collateral or other security to support derivative instruments into which we
enter. We also do not have any derivative instruments that require us to maintain a minimum
investment-grade credit rating.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on Statements of Income and Statements of Comprehensive Income
The following tables provide information about the gain or loss recognized in income and other
comprehensive income on our derivative instruments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009 (in millions), and the line items in the financial statements in which such gains and
losses are reflected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
Derivatives in |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Recognized in |
Fair Value |
|
Recognized in |
|
Recognized in |
|
Income for |
Hedging |
|
Income on |
|
Income on |
|
Ineffective Portion |
Relationships |
|
Derivatives |
|
Hedged Item |
|
of Derivative (1) |
|
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Three months ended June 30: |
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(207 |
) |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30: |
Commodity
contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For fair value hedges, no component of the derivative instruments gains or losses was
excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. No amounts were recognized in income for
hedged firm commitments that no longer qualify as fair value hedges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Derivatives in |
|
Recognized in |
|
Reclassified from |
|
Gain or (Loss) |
Cash Flow |
|
OCI on |
|
Accumulated OCI into |
|
Recognized in |
Hedging |
|
Derivatives |
|
Income |
|
Income on Derivatives |
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
(Ineffective Portion) (1) |
|
|
Amount |
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
Location |
|
Amount |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Three months ended June
30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts (2) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
Six months ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts (2) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No component of the derivative instruments gains or losses was excluded from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness. |
|
(2) |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, cash flow hedges primarily related to
forward sales of distillates and associated forward purchases of crude oil, with $52 million
of cumulative after-tax gains on cash flow hedges remaining in accumulated other comprehensive
income as of June 30, 2010. We expect that all of the deferred gains as of June 30, 2010 will be
reclassified into cost of sales over the next 12 months as a result of hedged transactions
that are forecasted to occur. The amount ultimately realized in income, however, will differ
as commodity prices change. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, there
were no amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income as a
result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedge accounting. |
27
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
Economic Hedges and Other |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
Recognized in |
Derivative Instruments |
|
Derivatives |
|
Income on Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Three Months Ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alon earn-out agreement |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Alon earn-out hedge
(commodity contracts) |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
$ |
38 |
|
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alon earn-out agreement |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Alon earn-out hedge
(commodity contracts) |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(112 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
Derivatives Designated as |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
Recognized in Income on |
Trading Activities |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Three Months Ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
28
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Prior to the second quarter of 2009, we had two reportable segments, which were refining and
retail. As a result of the VeraSun Acquisition during the second quarter of 2009 (as discussed in
Note 3), ethanol is presented as a third reportable segment.
The following table reflects activity related to continuing operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
Retail |
|
Ethanol |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external
customers |
|
$ |
18,760 |
|
|
$ |
2,357 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,775 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,647 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external
customers |
|
|
15,144 |
|
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,376 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external
customers |
|
|
35,657 |
|
|
|
4,533 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,418 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues from external
customers |
|
|
26,840 |
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,704 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
2,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
401 |
|
Total assets by reportable segment were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
$ |
31,010 |
|
|
$ |
30,901 |
|
Retail |
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
Ethanol |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
2,682 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
36,477 |
|
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate assets primarily include cash, corporate office buildings, and income tax receivables
that may exist from time to time.
29
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to our defined benefit plans were as follows
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
Pension Plans |
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our anticipated contributions to our qualified pension plans during 2010 have not changed from
amounts previously disclosed in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2009. During both of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, we contributed $50
million to our qualified pension plans.
In March 2010, a comprehensive health care reform package composed of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Health Care
Reform) was enacted into law. As a result of the Health Care Reform, the income tax expense
presented in our consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 includes a
charge of $16 million related to the non-deductibility of certain retiree prescription health care
costs, to the extent of federal subsidies received. Although the tax change provisions of the
Health Care Reform are not effective until 2013, the effect of changes in tax laws or rates on
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the period that includes the enactment date,
even though the changes may not be effective until future periods. Other provisions of the Health
Care Reform are also expected to affect the future costs of our health care plans. An
estimate of the additional impacts of the Health Care Reform is not yet practicable due to the
number and complexity of the provisions; however, we are currently evaluating the potential impact
of the Health Care Reform on our financial position and results of operations.
30
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Tax Matters
We are subject to extensive tax liabilities, including federal, state, and foreign income taxes and
transactional taxes such as excise, sales/use, payroll, franchise, withholding, and ad valorem
taxes. New tax laws and regulations and changes in existing tax laws and regulations are
continuously being enacted or proposed that could result in increased expenditures for tax
liabilities in the future. Many of these liabilities are subject to periodic audits by the
respective taxing authority. Subsequent changes to our tax liabilities as a result of these audits
may subject us to interest and penalties.
Effective June 1, 2010, the GOA enacted a new tax
regime applicable to refinery and terminal operations in Aruba. Under the new tax regime, we are subject to a profit
tax rate of 7% and a dividend withholding tax rate of 0%. In addition, all imports and exports are exempt from turnover
tax and throughput fees. Beginning June 1, 2012, we will also make a
minimum annual tax payment of $10 million (payable in equal quarterly installments), with the
ability to carry forward any excess tax prepayments to future tax years.
The new tax regime was the result of a settlement agreement
entered into on February 24, 2010 between the GOA and us that set the parties proposed terms for settlement of a lengthy
and complicated tax dispute between the parties. On May 30, 2010, the Aruban Parliament adopted several laws that
implemented the provisions of the settlement agreement,
which became effective June 1, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, we relinquished
the provisions of the previous tax holiday regime. On June 4, 2010, we made a payment to the GOA of $118
million (primarily from restricted cash held in escrow) in consideration of a full release of all tax claims
prior to June 1, 2010. This settlement resulted in an after-tax gain of $30 million recognized primarily as
a reduction to interest expense of $8 million and an income tax benefit of $20 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Environmental Matter
On June 30, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) formally disapproved the flexible
permits program submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in 1994 for
inclusion in its clean-air implementation plan. The EPA determined that Texas flexible permit
program did not meet several requirements under the federal Clean Air Act. Our Port Arthur, Texas City, Three
Rivers, McKee and Corpus Christi East and West Refineries operate under flexible permits
administered by the TCEQ. Accordingly, the permit status of these facilities has been called into
question. Litigation regarding the EPAs actions is anticipated.
We are currently evaluating the impacts of this new regulatory action and cannot estimate the financial or operational impacts on our business.
Depending on the final
resolution, the EPAs actions could result in material increased compliance costs for us, costly
remedial actions, increased capital expenditures, increased operating costs, and additional
operating restrictions for our business, resulting in an increase in the cost of the products we
produce, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, and liquidity.
Litigation
Retail Fuel Temperature Litigation
As of July 31, 2010, we were named in 21 consumer class action lawsuits relating to fuel
temperature. We have been named in these lawsuits together with several other defendants in the
retail and wholesale petroleum marketing business. The complaints, filed in federal courts in
several states, allege that because fuel volume increases with fuel temperature, the defendants
have violated state consumer
31
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
protection laws by failing to adjust the volume or price of fuel when
the fuel temperature exceeded 60 degrees Fahrenheit. The complaints seek to certify classes of
retail consumers who purchased fuel in various locations. The complaints seek an order compelling
the installation of temperature correction devices as well as monetary relief. The federal
lawsuits are consolidated into a multi-district litigation case in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Kansas (Multi-District Litigation Docket No. 1840, In re: Motor Fuel Temperature Sales
Practices Litigation). Discovery has commenced. In May 2010, the court issued an order in
response to the plaintiffs motion for class certification of only the Kansas cases. The court
certified an injunction class covering nonmonetary relief but deferred ruling on a damages
class. The defendants have filed a petition to appeal the certification order. We believe that
we have several strong defenses to these lawsuits and intend to contest them. We have not recorded
a loss contingency liability with respect to this matter, but due to the inherent uncertainty of
litigation, we believe that it is reasonably possible that we may suffer a loss with respect to one
or more of the lawsuits. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss from an adverse result
in all or substantially all of these cases cannot reasonably be made.
Other Litigation
We are also a party to additional claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. We believe that there is only a remote likelihood that future costs related to known
contingent liabilities related to these legal proceedings would have a material adverse impact on
our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
16. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In conjunction with the acquisition of Premcor Inc. on September 1, 2005, Valero Energy Corporation
has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the following debt of The Premcor Refining Group Inc.
(PRG), a wholly owned subsidiary of Valero Energy Corporation, that was outstanding as of June 30,
2010:
|
|
|
6.75% senior notes due February 2011 and |
|
|
|
|
6.125% senior notes due May 2011. |
In addition, PRG has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of the outstanding debt issued by
Valero Energy Corporation.
The following condensed consolidating financial information is provided for Valero and PRG as an
alternative to providing separate financial statements for PRG. The accounts for all companies
reflected herein are presented using the equity method of accounting for investments in
subsidiaries.
32
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments |
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,001 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
Assets held for sale and assets related
to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
10,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
25,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,439 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
(5,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
|
|
19,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
|
Investment in Valero Energy affiliates |
|
|
6,540 |
|
|
|
4,515 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(11,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes receivable from affiliates |
|
|
16,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax receivable |
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
24,075 |
|
|
$ |
8,504 |
|
|
$ |
31,733 |
|
|
$ |
(27,835 |
) |
|
$ |
36,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt and capital lease
obligations |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
523 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
5,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
572 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
6,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current
portion |
|
|
7,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,889 |
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
|
(16,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,833 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
6,876 |
|
|
|
(10,596 |
) |
|
|
7,833 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,620 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
13,591 |
|
|
|
(3,611 |
) |
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
13,591 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
15,051 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
11,055 |
|
|
|
(11,158 |
) |
|
|
15,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
24,075 |
|
|
$ |
8,504 |
|
|
$ |
31,733 |
|
|
$ |
(27,835 |
) |
|
$ |
36,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
747 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
825 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
888 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
Assets held for sale and assets related
to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
10,392 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
11,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
|
24,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,463 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
(5,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,699 |
|
|
|
19,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227 |
|
Investment in Valero Energy affiliates |
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(10,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes receivable from affiliates |
|
|
14,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax receivable |
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
22,515 |
|
|
$ |
8,239 |
|
|
$ |
31,054 |
|
|
$ |
(26,179 |
) |
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of debt and capital lease
obligations |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
5,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
7,747 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
7,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current
portion |
|
|
6,236 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,924 |
|
|
|
8,257 |
|
|
|
(14,181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
4,112 |
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
7,896 |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
6,887 |
|
|
|
(10,606 |
) |
|
|
7,896 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,721 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
13,178 |
|
|
|
(3,644 |
) |
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
13,178 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
14,725 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
10,263 |
|
|
|
(10,331 |
) |
|
|
14,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
22,515 |
|
|
$ |
8,239 |
|
|
$ |
31,054 |
|
|
$ |
(26,179 |
) |
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,404 |
|
|
$ |
20,496 |
|
|
$ |
(2,125 |
) |
|
$ |
21,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,728 |
|
|
|
17,717 |
|
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
19,320 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
847 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,831 |
|
|
|
19,148 |
|
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
20,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
921 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
806 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) (1) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
530 |
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
931 |
|
|
$ |
(1,039 |
) |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) reflected in each column does not include any tax effect of
the equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries. |
35
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
17,766 |
|
|
$ |
(3,298 |
) |
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,197 |
|
|
|
16,115 |
|
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
16,014 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
781 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
17,505 |
|
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
17,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before
income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) (1) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
(255 |
) |
|
$ |
(112 |
) |
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) reflected in each column does not include any tax effect
of the equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries. |
36
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,192 |
|
|
$ |
41,969 |
|
|
$ |
(7,743 |
) |
|
$ |
41,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,885 |
|
|
|
37,314 |
|
|
|
(7,743 |
) |
|
|
37,456 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,759 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
360 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
724 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,051 |
|
|
|
40,221 |
|
|
|
(7,743 |
) |
|
|
40,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
889 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
658 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) (1) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
Income from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
$ |
(1,089 |
) |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) reflected in each column does not include any tax
effect of the equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries. |
37
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Elimination |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,146 |
|
|
$ |
31,470 |
|
|
$ |
(5,912 |
) |
|
$ |
30,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,479 |
|
|
|
27,651 |
|
|
|
(5,912 |
) |
|
|
27,218 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
711 |
|
Asset impairment loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,786 |
|
|
|
30,428 |
|
|
|
(5,912 |
) |
|
|
30,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(640 |
) |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before
income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) (1) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operation |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
(360 |
) |
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The income tax expense (benefit) reflected in each column does not include any tax
effect of the equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries. |
38
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
(525 |
) |
|
$ |
1,289 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(785 |
) |
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(343 |
) |
Purchase of ethanol facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of the Delaware City Refinery
assets
and associated terminal and pipeline assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
Net intercompany loan repayments |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
Return of investment |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities |
|
|
(1,524 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-bank debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,244 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(517 |
) |
Accounts receivable sales program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,325 |
) |
Issuance of common stock in connection with
employee benefit plans |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
Dividend to parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Net intercompany borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
(1,524 |
) |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
Cash and temporary cash investments
at beginning of period |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of
period |
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
(unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valero |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation |
|
PRG |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(819 |
) |
|
$ |
2,234 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(1,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
Purchase of ethanol facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(556 |
) |
Minor acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Net intercompany loan repayments |
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other investing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-bank debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
Accounts receivable sales program: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
Repayments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net of
issuance costs |
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799 |
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with
employee benefit plans |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Common stock dividends |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Net intercompany borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
683 |
|
Cash and temporary cash investments
at beginning of period |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION
REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Form 10-Q, including without limitation our discussion below under the heading Overview and
Outlook, includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify our
forward-looking statements by the words anticipate, believe, expect, plan, intend,
estimate, project, projection, predict, budget, forecast, goal, guidance, target,
could, should, may, and similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding:
|
|
|
future refining margins, including gasoline and distillate margins; |
|
|
|
|
future retail margins, including gasoline, diesel, home heating oil, and convenience
store merchandise margins; |
|
|
|
|
future ethanol margins and the effect of the acquisition of ethanol plants on our
results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding feedstock costs, including crude oil differentials, and operating
expenses; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated levels of crude oil and refined product inventories; |
|
|
|
|
our anticipated level of capital investments, including deferred refinery turnaround and
catalyst costs and capital expenditures for environmental and other purposes, and the
effect of those capital investments on our results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
anticipated trends in the supply of and demand for crude oil and other feedstocks and
refined products in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere; |
|
|
|
|
expectations regarding environmental, tax, and other regulatory initiatives; and |
|
|
|
|
the effect of general economic and other conditions on refining and retail industry
fundamentals. |
We based our forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates, and projections
about ourselves and our industry. We caution that these statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that we cannot predict. In addition,
we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove
to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from the future
performance that we have expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements. Differences
between actual results and any future performance suggested in these forward-looking statements
could result from a variety of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
acts of terrorism aimed at either our facilities or other facilities that could impair
our ability to produce or transport refined products or receive feedstocks; |
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions in nations that consume refined products, including
the United States, and in crude oil producing regions, including the Middle East and South
America; |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign demand for, and supplies of, refined products such as gasoline,
diesel fuel, jet fuel, home heating oil, and petrochemicals; |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign demand for, and supplies of, crude oil and other feedstocks; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
to agree on and to maintain crude oil price and production controls; |
|
|
|
|
the level of consumer demand, including seasonal fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
refinery overcapacity or undercapacity; |
|
|
|
|
the actions taken by competitors, including both pricing and adjustments to refining
capacity in response to market conditions; |
41
|
|
|
the level of foreign imports of refined products; |
|
|
|
|
accidents or other unscheduled shutdowns affecting our refineries, machinery, pipelines,
or equipment, or those of our suppliers or customers; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the cost or availability of transportation for feedstocks and refined
products; |
|
|
|
|
the price, availability, and acceptance of alternative fuels and alternative-fuel
vehicles; |
|
|
|
|
delay of, cancellation of, or failure to implement planned capital projects and realize
the various assumptions and benefits projected for such projects or cost overruns in
constructing such planned capital projects; |
|
|
|
|
ethanol margins may be lower than expected; |
|
|
|
|
earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and irregular weather, which can unforeseeably
affect the price or availability of natural gas, crude oil, grain and other feedstocks,
and refined products and ethanol; |
|
|
|
|
rulings, judgments, or settlements in litigation or other legal or regulatory matters,
including unexpected environmental remediation costs, in excess of any reserves or
insurance coverage; |
|
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory action, including the introduction or enactment of federal,
state, municipal, or foreign legislation or rulemakings, including tax and environmental
regulations, which may adversely affect our business or operations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities and trade credit; |
|
|
|
|
changes in currency exchange rates, including the value of the Canadian dollar relative
to the U.S. dollar; and |
|
|
|
|
overall economic conditions, including the stability and liquidity of financial markets. |
Any one of these factors, or a combination of these factors, could materially affect our future
results of operations and whether any forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be accurate.
Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and
future performance may differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements.
We do not intend to update these statements unless we are required by the securities laws to do so.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting
on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. We undertake no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to any such forward-looking statements
that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
42
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
For the second quarter of 2010, we reported
income from continuing operations of $530 million, or $0.93 per share, compared to a loss from continuing
operations of $191 million, or $0.36 per share, for the second quarter of 2009. For the first six months
of 2010, we reported income from continuing operations of $429 million, or $0.76 per share, compared to $173 million,
or $0.33 per share, for the first six months of 2009. These results were primarily due to our refining
segment operations, which generated operating income of $921 million in the second quarter of 2010 and an
operating loss of $143 million in the second quarter of 2009. Refining segment operating income was
$870 million for the first six months of 2010 and $550 million for the first six months of 2009. The
increase in refining operating income for both comparable periods (2010 vs. 2009) was primarily due to
improved margins for the distillate products we produce and wider sour crude oil differentials. The
sour crude oil differential is the difference between the price of sweet crude oil and the price of sour
crude oil. We believe that the improved distillate margins are due to an increase in the demand for refined
products resulting from the slowly improving U.S. and worldwide economies. This refined product demand,
however, has not returned to levels experienced prior to the economic slowdown that began in 2008. In addition,
we believe there is excess worldwide refinery capacity and refined product inventories remain high. These factors
continue to constrain the margins for refined products.
In response to the worldwide economic slowdown, and as a result of our assessment of the operating performance and profitability of our refineries, we temporarily shut down our Aruba Refinery in July 2009 and permanently shut down our Delaware City Refinery in November 2009. Due to the shutdown of our Delaware City Refinery, we have reflected its results of operations as
discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of income and the operating highlights and refining operating highlights tables that follow this overview. On June 1, 2010, we completed the sale of our shutdown Delaware City Refinery assets and associated terminal and pipeline assets for $220 million of cash proceeds. We are also evaluating strategic alternatives for our Paulsboro Refinery and have entered into negotiations to sell the refinery.
Our Aruba Refinery has remained shut since July 2009 primarily because it has been uneconomical to operate due to narrow heavy sour crude oil differentials. However, in June 2010, due to the recent widening of the heavy sour crude oil differentials and the overall improvement in refining economics, we commenced refinery-wide maintenance to prepare the refinerys production units for potential restart by the end of the third quarter of 2010. This decision was also in response to our settlement of tax disputes with the Government of Aruba (GOA) effective June 1, 2010, which resolved uncertainties regarding our tax environment in Aruba. In connection with the settlement, we paid the GOA $118 million, consisting primarily of cash that had been escrowed in connection with those disputes. There is no certainty, however, that refining economics will recover sufficiently to justify restarting the refinery.
In the second quarter of 2009, we entered the ethanol business through the acquisition of seven ethanol facilities, and we acquired three additional facilities in the first quarter of 2010. We believe that ethanol is a natural fit for us because we manufacture transportation fuels. During the second quarter and first half of 2010, our ethanol segment generated operating income of
$35 million and $92 million, respectively, compared to $22 million for the second quarter
and first half of 2009. The ethanol business is dependent on margins between ethanol and
corn feedstocks and can be impacted by U.S. government subsidies and biofuels (including ethanol)
mandates.
Our retail segment generated operating income of $109 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to operating income of $65 million for the second quarter of 2009. Retail operating income was $180 million for the first six months of 2010, compared to $121 million for the comparable period in 2009. The 2010 results benefited from the blending of ethanol with the gasoline sold by our retail
43
segment. Ethanol is currently a lower cost product than gasoline and this lower cost results in an increase in retail fuel margins.
To support our financial strength and liquidity, we issued $1.25 billion in debt during the first quarter of 2010 at interest rates favorable to those on our existing debt. We used a portion of the proceeds to redeem our 7.50% senior notes for $294 million in March 2010, and our 6.75% senior notes for $190 million in May 2010; the remainder was used for general corporate purposes.
We expect the U.S. and worldwide economies to continue
to recover slowly, and we expect refined product demand to increase. The increase in anticipated refined product
demand is expected to result in an increase in crude oil production, which we believe will result in the production of
more sour crude oils and continued improvement in sour crude oil differentials. The expected increases in refined product
demand and sour crude oil production should favorably impact our refined product margins. However, we expect that the
current surplus and growth in global refining capacity will put pressure on refining margins and could result in
ongoing production constraints or refinery shutdowns in the refining industry. We will continue to optimize our refining assets based on market conditions.
44
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables highlight our results of operations, our operating performance, and market
prices that directly impact our operations. The narrative following these tables provides an
analysis of our results of operations.
Second Quarter 2010 Compared to Second Quarter 2009
Financial Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 (a) (b) |
|
2009 (a) (b) |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
21,775 |
|
|
$ |
17,376 |
|
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
19,320 |
|
|
|
16,014 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Ethanol |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Asset impairment loss (c) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
20,854 |
|
|
|
17,568 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
1,113 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
1,105 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
721 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes (b) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share
assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
(0.36 |
) |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.48 |
) |
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the footnote references on page 49.
45
Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel and per gallon amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) (c) |
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
9.39 |
|
|
$ |
4.74 |
|
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.55 |
|
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
$ |
4.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedstocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy sour crude |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Medium/light sour crude |
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Acidic sweet crude |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Sweet crude |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Residuals |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Other feedstocks |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total feedstocks |
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Blendstocks and other |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total throughput volumes |
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields (thousand barrels per day): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasolines and blendstocks |
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Distillates |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Petrochemicals |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other products (e) |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total yields |
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
2,394 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
Company-operated fuel sites (average) |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Fuel volumes (gallons per day per site) |
|
|
5,196 |
|
|
|
5,119 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Fuel margin per gallon |
|
$ |
0.220 |
|
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.095 |
|
Merchandise sales |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Canada: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Fuel volumes (thousand gallons per day) |
|
|
3,098 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Fuel margin per gallon |
|
$ |
0.276 |
|
|
$ |
0.253 |
|
|
$ |
0.023 |
|
Merchandise sales |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
See the footnote references on page 49.
46
Operating Highlights (continued)
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Ethanol production (thousand gallons per day) |
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
Gross margin per gallon of ethanol production |
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Operating costs per gallon of ethanol production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol operating expenses |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per gallon of
ethanol production |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the footnote references on page 49.
47
Refining Operating Highlights by Region (f)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
731 |
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
10.28 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
$ |
6.34 |
|
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.34 |
|
|
$ |
3.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
4.91 |
|
|
$ |
4.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Continent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
9.13 |
|
|
$ |
6.03 |
|
|
$ |
3.10 |
|
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.54 |
|
|
$ |
3.75 |
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
(0.36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
|
$ |
5.47 |
|
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
66 |
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
5.49 |
|
|
$ |
3.05 |
|
|
$ |
2.44 |
|
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.38 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
4.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
10.55 |
|
|
$ |
9.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.52 |
|
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.87 |
|
|
$ |
4.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
6.44 |
|
|
$ |
5.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) for regions above |
|
$ |
923 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
949 |
|
Asset impairment loss applicable to refining (c) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refining operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the footnote references on page 49.
48
Average Market Reference Prices and Differentials (g)
(dollars per barrel)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedstocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil |
|
$ |
77.80 |
|
|
$ |
59.54 |
|
|
$ |
18.26 |
|
WTI less sour crude oil at U.S. Gulf Coast (h) |
|
|
3.78 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
WTI less Mars crude oil |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
(1.83 |
) |
WTI less Maya crude oil |
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Gulf Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
|
|
(0.35 |
) |
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
|
|
9.21 |
|
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
|
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
|
|
12.14 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
|
Propylene less WTI |
|
|
6.11 |
|
|
|
(10.89 |
) |
|
|
17.00 |
|
U.S. Mid-Continent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
10.39 |
|
|
|
10.58 |
|
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
Low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
|
|
13.29 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
U.S. Northeast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
9.49 |
|
|
|
9.85 |
|
|
|
(0.36 |
) |
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
|
4.69 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
Lube oils less WTI |
|
|
52.36 |
|
|
|
25.64 |
|
|
|
26.72 |
|
U.S. West Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARBOB 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
|
18.07 |
|
|
|
(1.57 |
) |
CARB diesel less WTI |
|
|
14.45 |
|
|
|
7.92 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
New York Harbor corn crush (dollars per gallon) |
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
The following notes relate to references on pages 45 through 49. |
|
(a) |
|
The information presented for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 includes the
operations related to the acquisition of seven ethanol plants from VeraSun Energy Corporation
(VeraSun) beginning on their respective closing dates in the second quarter of 2009 including
plants located in Albert City, Charles City, Fort Dodge, and Hartley, Iowa; Aurora, South
Dakota; Welcome, Minnesota; and Albion, Nebraska. In addition, information presented for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 includes operations related to two ethanol plants purchased
on January 13, 2010 from ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC (ASA) located in Bloomingburg, Ohio and
Linden, Illinois and one ethanol plant purchased on February 4, 2010 from Renew Energy LLC
(Renew) located in Jefferson, Wisconsin. The ethanol production volumes reflected for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are based on total production during each period
divided by actual calendar days per period. |
|
(b) |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we permanently shut down our refinery in Delaware City,
Delaware, and wrote down the book value of the refinery assets to net realizable value. On
June 1, 2010, we sold the shutdown refinery assets and the terminal and pipeline assets also
located in Delaware City to PBF Energy Partners LP (PBF) for $220 million of cash proceeds. The
results of operations of the shutdown refinery are reflected as discontinued operations for
both periods presented. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, those results include a gain
of $92 million ($58 million after taxes) on the sale of the refinery assets. The gain
primarily resulted from the scrap value of the refinery assets and the reversal of certain
liabilities recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the
refinery, which will not be incurred because of the sale. The terminal and pipeline assets
previously associated with the refinery were not shut down and continued to be operated until
the date of their sale. The results of operations of those assets, including an insignificant
gain on sale, are reflected in continuing operations for both periods presented. All refining
operating highlights, both consolidated and for the Northeast Region, exclude the Delaware
City Refinery for both periods presented. |
|
(c) |
|
The asset impairment loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 relates primarily to the
permanent cancellation of certain capital projects classified as construction in progress as
a result of the unfavorable impact of the economic slowdown on refining industry fundamentals.
This loss has
been reclassified from operating expenses and presented separately for comparability with the
2010 presentation. The asset impairment loss amounts are included in the refining segment
operating income but are excluded from the regional operating income amounts and the consolidated and regional operating costs per barrel, resulting
in an adjustment to the operating costs per barrel previously reported in 2009. |
49
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Throughput margin per barrel represents operating revenues less cost of sales divided by
throughput volumes. |
|
(e) |
|
Other products primarily include gas oils, No. 6 fuel oil, petroleum coke, and asphalt. |
|
(f) |
|
The regions reflected herein contain the following refineries: the Gulf Coast refining region
includes the Corpus Christi East, Corpus Christi West, Texas City, Houston, Three Rivers,
St. Charles, Aruba, and Port Arthur Refineries; the Mid-Continent refining region includes the
McKee, Ardmore, and Memphis Refineries; the Northeast refining region includes the Quebec City
and Paulsboro Refineries; and the West Coast refining region includes the Benicia and
Wilmington Refineries. |
|
(g) |
|
The average market reference prices and differentials are based on posted prices from various
pricing services. The average market reference prices and differentials are presented to
provide users of the consolidated financial statements with economic indicators that
significantly affect our operations and profitability. |
|
(h) |
|
The market reference differential for sour crude oil is based on 50% Arab Medium and 50% Arab
Light posted prices. |
General
Operating revenues increased 25% (or $4.4 billion) for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the
second quarter of 2009 primarily as a result of higher refined product prices between the two
periods. Operating income increased $1.1 billion and income from continuing operations increased
$721 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to amounts reported for the second quarter of
2009 primarily due to a $1.1 billion increase in refining segment operating income discussed below.
Refining
Results of operations of our refining segment increased from an operating loss of $143 million for the
second quarter of 2009 to operating income of $921 million for the second quarter of 2010, resulting from
a 98% increase in throughput margin per barrel (a $4.65 per barrel increase between the comparable
periods) partially offset by a 2% decline in total throughput volumes (a 55,000 barrel per day decrease
between the comparable periods). The increase in the refining throughput margin per barrel for the
second quarter of 2010 was partially due to a significant improvement in distillate margins, but that
improvement was somewhat offset by a decline in gasoline margins in all of our refining regions.
Throughput margin per barrel also benefited from wider sour crude oil differentials. The impact of these
factors on our throughput margin per barrel is described below.
Changes in the margin that we receive for our products have a material impact on our results of
operations. For example, the benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast No. 2 fuel oil, which is a
type of distillate, was $9.21 per barrel for the second quarter of 2010, compared to $3.84 per barrel for the
second quarter of 2009, representing a favorable increase of $5.37 per barrel. Similar increases in
distillate margins were experienced in other regions. We estimate that the increase in margin for
distillates had a $332 million positive impact to our overall refining margin, quarter versus quarter, as we
produced 780,000 barrels per day of distillates during the second quarter of 2010. Distillate margins were
higher in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009 due to an increase in the
industrial demand for these products resulting from the ongoing recovery of the U.S. and worldwide
economies and exports.
Similarly, the benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast Conventional 87 gasoline (Gulf Coast 87 gasoline) was $10.22 per
barrel for the second quarter of 2010, compared to $10.57 per barrel for the second quarter of 2009,
representing an unfavorable decrease of $0.35 per barrel. Conventional 87 gasoline benchmark reference
margins decreased quarter versus quarter to an even greater extent in the West Coast region (a $1.57 per
barrel unfavorable decrease). We estimate that the decrease in gasoline margins had a $159 million
negative impact to our overall refining margin, quarter versus quarter, as we produced 1.15 million barrels
per day of gasoline during the second quarter of 2010. Gasoline margins were lower in the second quarter
of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009 despite an increase in gasoline prices in the second
quarter of 2010. We believe that the margins for gasoline were constrained due to continued weak consumer demand and high levels of inventory. In addition, our downstream
50
customers increased the use
of ethanol as a component in transportation fuels because its price was cheaper than gasoline.
The cost of crude oil we process also has a material impact on our results of operations because many of
our refineries have been designed to process sour crude oils, which we can purchase at a discount to sweet
crude oils. For example, Maya crude oil, which is a type of sour crude oil, sold at a discount of $9.75 per
barrel to West Texas Intermediate crude oil, which is a type of sweet crude oil, during the second quarter
of 2010. This compares to a discount of $4.57 per barrel during the second quarter of 2009, representing
a favorable increase of $5.18 per barrel. We estimate that the wider discounts for all types of sour crude
oil that we process had a $204 million positive impact to our overall refining margin, quarter versus
quarter, as we processed 994,000 barrels per day of sour crude oils.
The decrease in throughput volumes during 2010 compared to 2009 was due primarily to the temporary
shutdown of our Aruba Refinery commencing in July 2009.
Retail
Retail operating income was $109 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to $65 million for
the second quarter of 2009. This 68% (or $44 million) increase was due to improved retail fuel
margins of $51 million, partially offset by higher selling expenses of $16 million, $9 million of which relates to our
Canadian retail operations.
Retail fuel margins benefited from the blending of ethanol with the gasoline sold
by our retail segment. Ethanol is currently a lower cost product than gasoline and this lower cost results
in an increase in retail fuel margins. For example, the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) price for a gallon of ethanol was
$0.54 less than a gallon of Gulf Coast 87 gasoline for the second quarter of 2010, but
there was no difference between the prices of these products for the second quarter of
2009. In addition, approximately 80% of the gasoline we sold during the second quarter
of 2010 contained 10% ethanol.
The increase in selling expenses from our Canadian retail operations was due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar.
Ethanol
Ethanol operating income was $35 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to $22 million for
the second quarter of 2009. This increase of $13 million was primarily due to an increase in the
number of ethanol plants we operate. As more fully described in Note 3 of Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, we acquired three ethanol plants in the first quarter of 2010,
and these plants generated $6 million of operating income during the second quarter of 2010.
Corporate Expenses and Other
General and administrative expenses, including depreciation and amortization expense, increased
$10 million from the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2010 primarily due to a
$6 million increase in environmental remediation costs at a non-operating site.
Other income (expense), net for the second quarter of 2010 increased $24 million from the second
quarter of 2009 due mainly to a $34 million net loss in 2009 resulting from an increase of $14 million in the fair value of
an earn-out agreement that was entered into in connection with the sale of our Krotz
Springs Refinery in 2008, offset by a loss of $48 million related to commodity derivative
instruments entered into to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of the earn-out agreement.
51
Interest and debt expense for the second quarter of 2010 increased $32 million from the second
quarter of 2009. This increase is composed of a $20 million increase in interest
expense incurred primarily on $1.25 billion of debt issued in February 2010, as described in Note 7 of
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and a $12 million decrease in capitalized
interest due to a corresponding reduction in capital expenditures between the quarters and the
temporary suspension of activity on certain construction projects. We will not capitalize
interest with respect to suspended construction projects until significant construction
activities resume.
Income tax expense increased $384 million from the second quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of
2010 mainly as a result of higher operating income.
Income from discontinued operations of $53 million
for the second quarter of 2010 represents
a $58 million after-tax gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets at
Delaware City, partially offset by a $5 million net loss from the refinerys
operations prior to the sale. The gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets primarily
resulted from the scrap value of the assets and the reversal of certain liabilities recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the refinery, which we will not incur because of the sale.
52
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Financial Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 (a) (b) |
|
2009 (a) (b) |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
41,418 |
|
|
$ |
30,704 |
|
|
$ |
10,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
37,456 |
|
|
|
27,218 |
|
|
|
10,238 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,759 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Retail |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Ethanol |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Asset impairment loss (c) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
40,529 |
|
|
|
30,303 |
|
|
|
10,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
Interest and debt expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Capitalized |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income tax expense |
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes (b) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share
assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the footnote references on page 57.
53
Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel and per gallon amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (c) |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
7.70 |
|
|
$ |
6.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.96 |
|
|
$ |
3.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
5.53 |
|
|
$ |
5.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedstocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy sour crude |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Medium/light sour crude |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
Acidic sweet crude |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Sweet crude |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Residuals |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other feedstocks |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total feedstocks |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
Blendstocks and other |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total throughput volumes |
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields (thousand barrels per day): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gasolines and blendstocks |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Distillates |
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
Petrochemicals |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Other products (e) |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total yields |
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail U.S.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
Company-operated fuel sites (average) |
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Fuel volumes (gallons per day per site) |
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
5,052 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Fuel margin per gallon |
|
$ |
0.181 |
|
|
$ |
0.121 |
|
|
$ |
0.060 |
|
Merchandise sales |
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Canada: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
Fuel volumes (thousand gallons per day) |
|
|
3,088 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Fuel margin per gallon |
|
$ |
0.287 |
|
|
$ |
0.252 |
|
|
$ |
0.035 |
|
Merchandise sales |
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
|
|
31.0 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Retail selling expenses |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
See the footnote references on page 57.
54
Operating Highlights (continued)
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol (a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
Ethanol production (thousand gallons per day) |
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
Gross margin per gallon of ethanol production |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Operating costs per gallon of ethanol production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethanol operating expenses |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per gallon of
ethanol production |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the footnote references on page 57.
55
Refining Operating Highlights by Region (f)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
639 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
8.35 |
|
|
$ |
5.48 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.85 |
|
|
$ |
3.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
5.49 |
|
|
$ |
5.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Continent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
7.32 |
|
|
$ |
8.07 |
|
|
$ |
(0.75 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.79 |
|
|
$ |
3.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
5.27 |
|
|
$ |
5.32 |
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast (b): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
(99 |
) |
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
|
$ |
6.46 |
|
|
$ |
(0.82 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
3.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.40 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
5.21 |
|
|
$ |
4.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
West Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
(197 |
) |
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
|
$ |
7.89 |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
$ |
(3.77 |
) |
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refining operating expenses |
|
$ |
4.92 |
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs per barrel |
|
$ |
6.47 |
|
|
$ |
6.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income for regions above |
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
689 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
Asset impairment loss applicable to refining (c) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total refining operating income |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
550 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the footnote references on page 57.
56
Average Market Reference Prices and Differentials (g)
(dollars per barrel)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feedstocks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WTI crude oil |
|
$ |
78.24 |
|
|
$ |
51.26 |
|
|
$ |
26.98 |
|
WTI less sour crude oil at U.S. Gulf Coast (h) |
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
WTI less Mars crude oil |
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
WTI less Maya crude oil |
|
|
9.33 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Gulf Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
8.68 |
|
|
|
9.36 |
|
|
|
(0.68 |
) |
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
|
|
7.44 |
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
|
|
9.82 |
|
|
|
9.38 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
Propylene less WTI |
|
|
11.86 |
|
|
|
(8.69 |
) |
|
|
20.55 |
|
U.S. Mid-Continent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
8.55 |
|
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
|
(1.03 |
) |
Low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
|
8.94 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
U.S. Northeast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
8.68 |
|
|
|
8.99 |
|
|
|
(0.31 |
) |
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
9.06 |
|
|
|
(0.56 |
) |
Lube oils less WTI |
|
|
43.34 |
|
|
|
46.37 |
|
|
|
(3.03 |
) |
U.S. West Coast: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CARBOB 87 gasoline less WTI |
|
|
13.54 |
|
|
|
18.60 |
|
|
|
(5.06 |
) |
CARB diesel less WTI |
|
|
11.44 |
|
|
|
10.81 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
New York harbor corn crush (dollars per gallon) |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
The following notes relate to references on pages 53 through 57. |
|
(a) |
|
The information presented for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 includes the
operations related to the acquisition of seven ethanol plants from VeraSun beginning on their
respective closing dates in the second quarter of 2009 including plants located in Albert
City, Charles City, Fort Dodge, and Hartley, Iowa; Aurora, South Dakota; Welcome, Minnesota;
and Albion, Nebraska. In addition, information presented for the six months ended June 30,
2010 includes operations related to two ethanol plants purchased on January 13, 2010 from ASA
located in Bloomingburg, Ohio and Linden, Illinois and one ethanol plant purchased on February
4, 2010 from Renew located in Jefferson, Wisconsin. The ethanol production volumes reflected
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are based on total production during the
period divided by actual calendar days per period. |
|
(b) |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we permanently shut down our refinery in Delaware City,
Delaware, and wrote down the book value of the refinery assets to net realizable value. On
June 1, 2010, we sold the shutdown refinery assets and the terminal and pipeline assets also
located in Delaware City to PBF for $220 million of cash proceeds. The results of operations of
the shutdown refinery are reflected as discontinued operations for both periods presented. For
the six months ended June 30, 2010, those results include a gain of $92 million ($58 million
after taxes) on the sale of the refinery assets. The gain primarily resulted from the scrap
value of the refinery assets and the reversal of certain liabilities recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the refinery, which will not be incurred
because of the sale. The terminal and pipeline assets previously associated with the refinery
were not shut down and continued to be operated until the date of their sale. The results of
operations of those assets, including an insignificant gain on sale, are reflected in
continuing operations for both periods presented. All refining operating highlights, both
consolidated and for the Northeast Region, exclude the Delaware City Refinery for both periods
presented. |
|
(c) |
|
The asset impairment loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 relates primarily to the
permanent cancellation of certain capital projects classified as construction in progress as
a result of the unfavorable impact of the economic slowdown on refining industry fundamentals.
This loss has
been reclassified from operating expenses and presented separately for comparability with the
2010 presentation. The asset impairment loss amounts are included in the refining segment
operating income but are excluded from the regional operating income amounts and the
consolidated and regional operating costs per barrel, resulting in an adjustment to the
operating costs per barrel previously reported in 2009. |
57
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Throughput margin per barrel represents operating revenues less cost of sales divided by
throughput volumes. |
|
(e) |
|
Other products primarily include gas oils, No. 6 fuel oil, petroleum coke, and asphalt. |
|
(f) |
|
The regions reflected herein contain the following refineries: the Gulf Coast refining region
includes the Corpus Christi East, Corpus Christi West, Texas City, Houston, Three Rivers,
St. Charles, Aruba, and Port Arthur Refineries; the Mid-Continent refining region includes the
McKee, Ardmore, and Memphis Refineries; the Northeast refining region includes the Quebec City
and Paulsboro Refineries; and the West Coast refining region includes the Benicia and
Wilmington Refineries. |
|
(g) |
|
The average market reference prices and differentials are based on posted prices from various
pricing services. The average market reference prices and differentials are presented to
provide users of the consolidated financial statements with economic indicators that
significantly affect our operations and profitability. |
|
(h) |
|
The market reference differential for sour crude oil is based on 50% Arab Medium and 50% Arab
Light posted prices. |
General
Operating revenues increased 35% (or $10.7 billion) for the first six months of 2010 compared to
the first six months of 2009 primarily as a result of higher refined product prices between the two
periods. Operating income increased $488 million and income from continuing operations increased
$256 million for the first six months of 2010 compared to the amounts reported in the first six
months of 2009 primarily due to a $320 million increase in refining segment operating income
discussed below.
Refining
Operating income for our refining segment increased from $550 million for the first six months of
2009 to $870 million for the first six months of 2010, primarily due to the decline of $137 million
in asset impairment losses from $139 million for the first six months of 2009 to
$2 million for the first six months of 2010. As discussed in the Overview and Outlook above, we
responded in a number of ways to the economic slowdown that began in 2008, including the evaluation
of all of our ongoing construction projects. This evaluation resulted in our decision to
permanently cancel certain projects throughout 2009. While this evaluation process has continued
into 2010, the number and significance of projects cancelled has substantially declined.
Changes
in the margin that we receive for our refined products typically have a material impact on our results of
operations. However, the difference in margins between the first six months of 2010 and 2009 was
not significant. In addition, the cost of crude oil we process typically has a material impact on our results operations. For
the first six months of 2010, the discount applicable to the price of sour crude oil as compared to the price
of sweet crude oil was wider than the discount for the first six months of 2009. For example, Maya crude
oil, which is a type of sour crude oil, sold at a discount of $9.33 per barrel to West Texas Intermediate
crude oil, which is a type of sweet crude oil, during the first six months of 2010. This compared to a
discount of $4.51 per barrel during the first six months of 2009, representing a favorable increase of
$4.82 per barrel. The benefit of this wider discount, however, was offset by a reduction of
114,000 barrels per day of sour crude oil that we processed during the first six months of 2010 as
compared to the first six months of 2009.
Retail
Retail operating income was $180 million for the first six months of 2010 compared to $121 million
for the first six months of 2009. This 49% (or $59 million) increase was primarily due to improved
retail fuel margins of $69 million offset by a $16 million increase in selling expenses in our
Canadian retail operations.
Retail fuel margins benefited from the blending of ethanol with the gasoline sold
by our retail segment. Ethanol is currently a lower cost product
than gasoline and this lower cost results in an increase in retail fuel margins. For example, the CBOT price for a
gallon of ethanol was $0.45 less than a gallon of
58
Gulf Coast 87 gasoline for the first six months of 2010,
but a gallon of ethanol was $0.17
higher than a gallon of Gulf Coast 87 gasoline for the first six months of 2009. In
addition, approximately 80% of the gasoline we sold during the first six months of 2010
contained 10% ethanol.
The increase in selling expenses from our Canadian retail operations
was due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar.
Ethanol
Ethanol operating income was $92 million for the first six months of 2010 compared to $22 million
for the first six months of 2009. The increase of $70 million was due to a full six months of
operations of the seven ethanol plants acquired in the VeraSun Acquisition in the second quarter of
2009 and the addition of three ethanol plants acquired in the
first quarter of 2010, as described more fully in Note 3 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Corporate Expenses and Other
General and administrative expenses, including depreciation and amortization expense, decreased
$37 million from the first six months of 2009 to the first six months of 2010 due mainly to a
favorable settlement with an insurance company for $40 million. This settlement related to our
claim of insurance coverage in connection with losses incurred in prior periods related to certain
litigation.
Other income (expense), net for the first six months of 2010 increased $36 million from the first
six months of 2009 primarily due to a $38 million net loss in 2009 resulting from an increase of $25 million in the fair value
of an earn-out agreement that was entered into in connection with the sale of
our Krotz Springs Refinery in 2008, offset by a loss of $63 million related to commodity derivative
instruments entered into to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of the earn-out agreement.
Interest and debt expense increased $79 million from the first six months of 2009 to the first six
months of 2010. This increase is composed of a $48 million increase in interest incurred on
$1.25 billion of debt issued in February 2010 and $1.0 billion of debt issued in March 2009 (see
Note 7 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and a $31 million decrease in
capitalized interest due to a corresponding reduction in capital expenditures between the quarters
and the temporary suspension of activity on certain construction projects. We will not capitalize
interest with respect to suspended construction projects until significant construction
activities resume.
Income tax expense increased $189 million from the first six months of 2009 to the first six months
of 2010 due to higher operating income.
Income from discontinued operations
of $41 million for the first six months of 2010 represents
a $58 million after-tax gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets at
Delaware City, partially offset by a $17 million net loss from the refinerys
operations prior to the sale. The gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets primarily
resulted from the scrap value of the assets and the reversal of certain liabilities
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the refinery, which
we will not incur because of the sale.
59
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of 2010 was $1.8 billion
compared to $1.4 billion for the first six months of 2009. The increase in cash generated from
operating activities was primarily due to the receipt of a $923 million tax refund in 2010.
Changes in cash provided by or used for working capital during the first six months of 2010 and
2009 are shown in Note 10 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net cash generated from operating activities during the first six months of 2010, combined with
$1.244 billion of proceeds from the issuance of $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February 2015
and $850 million of 6.125% notes due in February 2020 as discussed in Note 7 of Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, and $220 million of proceeds from the sale of the Delaware City
Refinery assets and associated terminal and pipeline assets as discussed in Note 4 of Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, were used mainly to:
|
|
|
fund $1.1 billion of capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs; |
|
|
|
|
redeem our 7.5% senior notes for $294 million and our 6.75% senior notes for
$190 million; |
|
|
|
|
make scheduled long-term note repayments of $33 million; |
|
|
|
|
make repayments under our accounts receivable sales facility of $100 million; |
|
|
|
|
pay common stock dividends of $57 million; |
|
|
|
|
purchase additional ethanol facilities for $260 million; and |
|
|
|
|
increase available cash on hand by $1.2 billion. |
The net cash generated from operating activities during the first six months of 2009, combined with
$998 million of proceeds from the issuance of $1 billion of notes in March 2009 as discussed in
Note 7 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and $799 million of net proceeds
from the issuance of 46 million shares of common stock in June 2009 as discussed in Note 8 of
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, were used mainly to:
|
|
|
fund $1.6 billion of capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs; |
|
|
|
|
fund the VeraSun Acquisition for $556 million; |
|
|
|
|
make scheduled long-term note repayments of $209 million; |
|
|
|
|
pay common stock dividends of $155 million; |
|
|
|
|
fund a $29 million acquisition of two pipelines; and |
|
|
|
|
increase available cash on hand by $683 million. |
Capital Investments
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we expended $785 million for capital expenditures and
$343 million for deferred turnaround and catalyst costs. Capital expenditures for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 included $369 million of costs related to environmental projects.
For 2010, we expect to incur approximately $2.3 billion for capital investments, including
approximately $1.8 billion for capital expenditures (approximately $780 million of which is for
environmental projects) and approximately $500 million for deferred turnaround and catalyst costs.
The capital expenditure estimate excludes expenditures related to strategic acquisitions. We
continuously evaluate our capital budget and make changes as economic conditions warrant.
In January 2010, we acquired two ethanol plants and inventories from ASA for a total purchase price
of $202 million. The plants are located in Linden, Indiana and Bloomingburg, Ohio. In February
2010, we acquired an additional ethanol plant located near Jefferson, Wisconsin from Renew plus
certain
60
receivables and inventories for a total purchase price of $79 million. Of the $281 million
total purchase price paid for these acquisitions, $21 million was paid in the fourth quarter of
2009.
Effective June 1, 2010, we sold the shutdown Delaware City Refinery assets and associated terminal
and pipeline assets to PBF for $220 million of cash proceeds. The
sale resulted in a gain of $92 million related to the shutdown refinery assets and a $3 million
gain related to the terminal and pipeline assets. The gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets
primarily resulted from the scrap value of the assets and the reversal of certain liabilities
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the refinery, which we will not incur because of the sale.
This gain
is presented in income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the
consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2010, our contractual obligations included debt, capital lease obligations,
operating leases, purchase obligations, and other long-term liabilities.
In February 2010, we issued $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February 2015 and $850 million of
6.125% notes due in February 2020. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled $1.244 billion, before deducting underwriting discounts and other issuance costs of $10 million.
In March 2010, we redeemed our 7.50% senior notes with a maturity date of June 15, 2015 for
$294 million, or 102.5% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $296 million as of
the redemption date, resulting in a $2 million gain that was included in other income (expense),
net in the consolidated statements of income.
In April 2010, we made scheduled debt
repayments of $8 million related to our Series A
5.45%, Series B 5.40%, and Series C 5.40% industrial revenue bonds.
In May 2010, we redeemed our 6.75% senior notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2014 for
$190 million, or 102.25% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $187 million as of
the redemption date, resulting in a $3 million dollar loss that was included in other income
(expense), net in the consolidated statements of income.
In June 2010, we made scheduled debt repayments of $25 million related to our 7.25% debentures.
We have an accounts receivable sales facility with a group of third-party entities and financial
institutions to sell on a revolving basis up to $1 billion of eligible trade receivables, which
matures in June 2011. As of June 30, 2010, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $100 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we had no material changes outside the ordinary course
of our business in capital lease obligations, operating leases, purchase obligations, or other
long-term liabilities.
61
Our agreements do not have rating agency triggers that would automatically require us to post
additional collateral. However, in the event of certain downgrades of our senior unsecured debt to
below investment grade ratings by Moodys Investors Service and Standard & Poors Ratings Services,
the cost of borrowings under some of our bank credit facilities and other arrangements would
increase. As of June 30, 2010, all of our ratings on our senior unsecured debt are at or above
investment grade level as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating Agency |
|
Rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Poors Ratings Services
|
|
BBB (negative outlook) |
|
|
Moodys Investors Service
|
|
Baa2 (negative outlook) |
|
|
Fitch Ratings
|
|
BBB (negative outlook) |
The ratings agencies have placed a negative outlook on the ratings, which we believe is a result of
the weak refining margin environment and general economic slowdown. We cannot provide assurance
that these ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these
ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. We note that these credit
ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold our securities and may be revised or
withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any
other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of our credit ratings could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to obtain short- and long-term financing as well as the cost of
such financings.
Other Commercial Commitments
As of June 30, 2010, our committed lines of credit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity |
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of credit facility
|
|
$300 million
|
|
June 2011 |
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$2.4 billion
|
|
November 2012 |
|
|
Canadian revolving credit facility
|
|
Cdn. $115 million
|
|
December 2012 |
As of June 30, 2010, we had $76 million of letters of credit outstanding under our uncommitted
short-term bank credit facilities and $225 million of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S.
committed
revolving credit facilities. Under our Canadian committed revolving credit facility, we
had
Cdn. $20 million of letters of credit outstanding as of June 30, 2010. Our letters of credit
expire during 2010 and 2011.
Stock Purchase Programs
As of June 30, 2010, we have approvals under common stock purchase programs previously approved by
our board of directors to purchase approximately $3.5 billion of our common stock.
Tax Matters
We are subject to extensive tax liabilities, including federal, state, and foreign income taxes and
transactional taxes such as excise, sales/use, payroll, franchise, withholding, and ad valorem
taxes. New tax laws and regulations and changes in existing tax laws and regulations are
continuously being enacted or proposed that could result in increased expenditures for tax
liabilities in the future. Many of these liabilities are subject to periodic audits by the
respective taxing authority. Subsequent changes to our tax liabilities as a result of these audits
may subject us to interest and penalties.
Effective June 1, 2010, the GOA enacted a new
tax regime applicable to refinery and terminal operations in Aruba. Under the new tax regime, we are subject to a
profit tax rate of 7% and a dividend withholding tax rate of 0%. In addition, all imports and exports are exempt from
turnover tax and throughput fees.
62
Beginning June 1, 2012, we will also make a minimum
annual tax payment of $10 million (payable in equal quarterly installments), with the ability to carry forward any
excess tax prepayments to future tax years.
The new tax regime was the result of a settlement
agreement entered into on February 24, 2010 between the GOA and us that set the parties proposed terms for settlement
of a lengthy and complicated tax dispute between the parties. On May 30, 2010, the Aruban Parliament adopted several
laws that implemented the provisions of the settlement agreement,
which became effective June 1, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, we relinquished the provisions
of the previous tax holiday regime. On June 4, 2010, we made a payment to the GOA of $118 million (primarily from restricted
cash held in escrow) in consideration of a full release of all tax claims prior to June 1, 2010. This settlement resulted in
an after-tax gain of $30 million recognized primarily as a reduction to interest expense of $8 million and an income tax benefit
of $20 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Other Matters Impacting Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we contributed $50 million to our qualified pension
plans. No additional contributions to the qualified pension plans are anticipated during 2010.
In April 2010, Somali pirates hijacked a South Korean supertanker off the East African coast with a
cargo of crude oil that we took title to in March upon loading into the vessel. The vessel and
its cargo are currently in the possession of the Somali pirates. We paid our crude oil supplier
for the cargo in April. We believe that we will regain possession of the cargo, and we do not
anticipate this matter will have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity.
Financial Regulatory Reform
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Wall Street Reform Act). The Wall Street Reform Act, among many things, creates
new regulations for companies that extend credit to consumers and requires most derivative instruments
to be traded on exchanges and routed through clearinghouses. Rules to implement the Wall Street
Reform Act are being finalized and therefore, the impact to our operations is not yet known.
However, implementation could result in higher margin requirements, higher clearing costs, and more
reporting requirements with respect to our derivative activities.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, including
those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, pollution
prevention measures, greenhouse gas emissions, and characteristics and composition of gasolines and
distillates. Because environmental laws and regulations are becoming more complex and stringent
and new environmental laws and regulations are continuously being enacted or proposed, the level of
future expenditures required for environmental matters could increase in the future. In addition,
any major upgrades in any of our refineries could require material additional expenditures to
comply with environmental laws and regulations.
Currently, some of the proposed federal cap-and-trade legislation would require businesses that emit
greenhouse gases to buy emission credits from the government, other businesses, or through an auction
process. In addition, refiners would be obligated to purchase emission credits associated with the
transportation fuels (gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel) sold and consumed in the United States. As a result of
such a program, we would be required to purchase emission credits for greenhouse gas emissions
resulting from our own operations as well as from the fuels we sell. Although it is not possible at this
time to predict the final form of a cap-and-trade bill (or whether such a bill will be passed by Congress),
any new federal restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions including a cap-and-trade program could
63
result in material increased compliance costs, additional operating restrictions for our business, and an
increase in the cost of the products we produce, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.
On June 30, 2010, the EPA formally disapproved the flexible
permits program submitted by the TCEQ in 1994 for
inclusion in its clean-air implementation plan. The EPA determined that Texas flexible permit
program did not meet several requirements under the federal Clean Air Act. Our Port Arthur, Texas City, Three
Rivers, McKee and Corpus Christi East and West Refineries operate under flexible permits
administered by the TCEQ. Accordingly, the permit status of these facilities has been called into
question. Litigation regarding the EPAs actions is anticipated.
We are currently evaluating the impacts of this new regulatory
action and cannot estimate the financial or operational impacts on our business.
Depending on the final resolution,
the EPAs actions could result in material increased compliance costs for us, costly remedial
actions, increased capital expenditures, increased operating costs, and additional operating
restrictions for our business, resulting in an increase in the cost
of the products we produce, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position,
results of operations, and liquidity.
Other
We believe that we have sufficient funds from operations and, to the extent necessary, from
borrowings under our credit facilities, to fund our ongoing operating requirements. We expect
that, to the extent necessary, we can raise additional funds from time to time through equity or
debt financings in the public and private capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit
facilities. However, there can be no assurances regarding the availability of any future
financings or additional credit facilities or whether such financings or additional credit
facilities can be made available on terms that are acceptable to us.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
As discussed in Note 2 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, certain new
financial accounting pronouncements have been issued that have already been reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
64
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of commodities, interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we enter into derivative instruments to manage those
risks. We also enter into derivative instruments to manage the price risk on other contractual
derivatives into which we have entered. The only types of derivative instruments we enter into are
those related to the various commodities we purchase or produce, interest rate swaps, and foreign
currency exchange and purchase
contracts as described below. All derivative instruments are
recorded on our balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair values.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
We are exposed to market risks related to the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily
gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), and natural gas used in our refining operations.
To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we enter into
commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options to hedge:
|
|
|
inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories generally for amounts by which
our current year LIFO inventory levels differ from our previous year-end LIFO inventory
levels and |
|
|
|
|
forecasted feedstock and refined product purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas
purchases to lock in the price of those forecasted transactions at existing market prices
that we deem favorable. |
We use the futures markets for the available liquidity, which provides greater flexibility in
transacting our hedging and trading operations. We use swaps primarily to convert our floating
price exposure to a fixed price. We also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for
trading purposes to take advantage of existing market conditions related to crude oil and refined
products that we perceive as
opportunities to benefit our results of operations and cash flows, but for which there are no
related physical transactions.
Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a
risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been
approved by our board of directors.
The following sensitivity analysis includes all positions at the end of the reporting period with which we have
market risk (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Held For |
|
|
Non-Trading |
|
Trading |
|
|
Purposes |
|
Purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% increase in underlying commodity prices |
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
10% decrease in underlying commodity prices |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) in fair value due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% increase in underlying commodity prices |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
10% decrease in underlying commodity prices |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 12 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for notional volumes associated
with these derivative contracts as of June 30, 2010.
65
INTEREST RATE RISK
The following table provides information about our debt instruments (dollars in millions), the fair
value of which is sensitive to changes in interest rates. Principal cash flows and related
weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates are presented. We had no interest rate
derivative instruments outstanding as of June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Expected Maturity Dates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
after |
|
Total |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
6,089 |
|
|
$ |
7,964 |
|
|
$ |
9,260 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Floating rate |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Expected Maturity Dates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2014 |
|
after |
|
Total |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
489 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
5,126 |
|
|
$ |
7,220 |
|
|
$ |
8,028 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Floating rate |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
As of June 30, 2010, we had commitments to purchase $325 million of U.S. dollars. Our market risk
was minimal on these contracts, as they matured on or before July 30, 2010, resulting in an
$8 million loss in the third quarter of 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the
period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of June 30, 2010.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
66
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information below describes new proceedings or material developments in proceedings that we
previously reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, or our
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Litigation
For the legal proceedings listed below, we hereby incorporate by reference into this Item our
disclosures made in Part I, Item 1 of this Report included in Note 15 of Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption Litigation.
|
|
|
Retail Fuel Temperature Litigation |
|
|
|
|
Other Litigation |
Environmental Enforcement Matters
While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the following environmental proceedings, if any
one or more of them were decided against us, we believe that there would be no material effect on
our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We are reporting these proceedings
to comply with SEC regulations, which require us to disclose certain information about proceedings
arising under federal, state, or local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment or protecting the environment if we reasonably believe that such proceedings will
result in monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) (Benicia Refinery). In June 2010, our Benicia
Refinery received two violation notices (VNs) issued by the BAAQMD alleging excess emissions and
public nuisance. The VNs relate to emission events that occurred in the second quarter of 2010 in
connection with certain operational issues concerning the refinerys coker unit. No penalties were
specified in these VNs. We are evaluating our response to the VNs.
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DDNREC) (Delaware City
Refinery) (this matter was last disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009). We recently signed an agreement with the DDNREC to settle all then-outstanding
air, water, and waste enforcement actions pertaining to the Delaware City Refinery. The settlement
included all notices of violation and other open matters that we previously disclosed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
67
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) (Paulsboro Refinery) (this matter was
last disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009). In March
2009 and August 2009, the NJDEP issued Notices of Revocation (Notices) to our Paulsboro Refinery
alleging that the refinery exceeded emission limits for particulate matter and hydrogen cyanide.
The first Notice relates to a fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) stack test conducted in 2007. The
second Notice relates to an FCC stack test conducted in February 2009. The Notices assess
penalties of $40,000 and $285,000, respectively, and direct the refinery either to perform a new
stack test or submit an application to modify the permit limits. We continue our discussions
with the NJDEP to resolve this matter, and we continue to work with the NJDEP on additional stack
testing. We have filed appeals on both Notices, and our request for a stay on both Notices has
been granted. A compliance order staying the Notices as they relate to excess emissions of
hydrogen cyanide pending revision of the applicable emission limit was issued in May 2010. A
parallel compliance order to address the Notices as they relate to emissions of particulate matter
is being negotiated with the NJDEP.
State of Ohio, Office of the Attorney General, Environmental Enforcement (The Premcor Refining
Group Inc. former Clark retail sites) (this matter was last disclosed in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009). In June 2008, the Attorney Generals office of the
State of Ohio issued a penalty demand to our wholly owned subsidiary, The Premcor Refining Group
Inc., for alleged environmental violations arising from a predecessors operation or ownership of
underground storage tanks at several sites. We have settled this matter with the Attorney
Generals office, and have finalized the terms of the consent orders (one for each county) for
final resolution.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our risk factor entitled Compliance with and changes in environmental laws, including proposed
climate change laws and regulations, could adversely affect our performance, as disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, is hereby amended and restated as
follows.
Compliance with and changes in environmental laws, including proposed climate change laws and
regulations, could adversely affect our performance.
The principal environmental risks associated with our operations are emissions into the air and
releases into the soil, surface water, or groundwater. Our operations are subject to extensive
federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, including those relating to the
discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, pollution prevention measures,
greenhouse gas emissions, and characteristics and composition of gasoline and diesel fuels. If we
violate or fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we could be fined or otherwise
sanctioned. Because environmental laws and regulations are becoming more stringent and new
environmental laws and regulations are continuously being enacted or proposed, such as those
relating to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change (e.g., Californias AB-32 Global Warming
Solutions Act, the U.S. House of Representatives American Clean Energy and Security Act of
2009, the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Clean Energy Jobs and American
Power Act of 2009, initiatives and rulemaking following the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencys
2009 Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of
the Clean Air Act), the level of expenditures required for environmental matters could increase in
the future. In particular, under certain permitting activities, the self-executing provisions of
the Clean Air Act following the EPAs endangerment finding and subsequent rule-making, lead to
environmental controls review for greenhouse gas emissions beginning January 2, 2011. This and
future legislative action and regulatory initiatives could result in changes to operating permits,
additional remedial actions, material changes in operations, increased capital expenditures and
operating costs, increased costs of the goods we sell, and decreased demand for our products that
cannot be assessed with certainty at this time.
68
Some of the proposed federal cap-and-trade legislation would require businesses that emit
greenhouse gases to buy emission credits from the government, other businesses, or through an
auction process. In addition, refiners would be obligated to purchase emission credits associated
with the transportation fuels (gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel) sold and consumed in the United
States. As a result of such a program, we would be required to purchase emission credits for
greenhouse gas emissions resulting from our own operations as well as from the fuels we sell.
Although it is not possible at this time to predict the final form of a cap-and-trade bill (or
whether such a bill will be passed by Congress), any new federal restrictions on greenhouse gas
emissions including a cap-and-trade program could result in material increased compliance
costs, additional operating restrictions for our business, and an increase in the cost of the
products we produce, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results
of operations, and liquidity.
On June 30, 2010, the EPA formally disapproved the long-standing flexible permitting rules that
the TCEQ uses as part of the states air quality program.
Although the program has been in place since 1994, the EPA now claims that the Texas program did not meet several requirements under the federal Clean Air Act. Our Port Arthur, Texas City, Three Rivers, McKee,
Corpus Christi East and West refineries have these so-called flex permits. Accordingly, the
permit status of these facilities has been called into question. Litigation regarding the EPAs
actions is anticipated.
We are currently evaluating the impacts of this new
regulatory action and cannot estimate the financial or operational impacts on our business.
Depending on the final resolution, the EPAs action could result in
material increased compliance costs for us, costly remedial actions, increased capital
expenditures, increased operating costs, and additional operating restrictions for our business,
resulting in an increase in the cost of the products we produce, which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.
69
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. Not applicable.
(b) Use of Proceeds. Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. The following table discloses purchases of shares
of our common stock made by us or on our behalf for the periods shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares Not |
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid per |
|
|
Purchased as Part |
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
Value) of Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
of Publicly |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or
Programs (1) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(at month end) (2) |
|
|
April 2010 |
|
|
|
14,416 |
|
|
|
$ |
20.64 |
|
|
|
|
14,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3.46 billion |
|
|
May 2010 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
$ |
20.59 |
|
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3.46 billion |
|
|
June 2010 |
|
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
|
$ |
17.56 |
|
|
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3.46 billion |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
18,908 |
|
|
|
$ |
20.00 |
|
|
|
|
18,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3.46 billion |
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the second
quarter of 2010 relating to (a) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions
to meet our obligations under employee benefit plans, and (b) our purchases of shares
from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of
stock options, the vesting of restricted stock, and other stock compensation
transactions in accordance with the terms of our incentive compensation plans. |
(2) |
|
On April 26, 2007, we publicly announced an increase in our common stock
purchase program from $2 billion to $6 billion, as authorized by our board of
directors on April 25, 2007. The $6 billion common stock purchase program has no
expiration date. On February 28, 2008, we announced that our board of directors
approved a $3 billion common stock purchase program. This program is in addition to
the $6 billion program. This $3 billion program has no expiration date. |
70
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
*12.01
|
|
Statements of Computations of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed
Charges and Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
Stock Dividends. |
|
|
|
*31.01
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal executive officer. |
|
|
|
*31.02
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal financial officer. |
|
|
|
*32.01
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications (as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). |
|
|
|
**101
|
|
The following materials from Valero Energy Corporations Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL
(Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated
Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income, and (v) Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Submitted electronically herewith. |
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL information in Exhibit 101 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or
other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as
shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
71
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michael S. Ciskowski
|
|
|
|
Michael S. Ciskowski |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Date: August 6, 2010
72