e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-14267
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
65-0716904 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
18500 NORTH ALLIED WAY |
|
|
PHOENIX, ARIZONA
|
|
85054 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (480) 627-2700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On July 20, 2011, the registrant had outstanding 376,530,530 shares of Common Stock, par value
$.01 per share (excluding treasury shares of 25,219,427).
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
320.5 |
|
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $47.1 and $50.9,
respectively |
|
|
872.3 |
|
|
|
828.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
169.6 |
|
|
|
207.4 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
121.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,479.6 |
|
|
|
1,246.1 |
|
Restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
|
160.1 |
|
|
|
172.8 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
6,702.7 |
|
|
|
6,698.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10,640.2 |
|
|
|
10,655.3 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
439.2 |
|
|
|
451.3 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
260.2 |
|
|
|
237.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
19,682.0 |
|
|
$ |
19,461.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
476.8 |
|
|
$ |
606.5 |
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
397.8 |
|
|
|
878.5 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
304.9 |
|
|
|
295.1 |
|
Accrued landfill and environmental costs, current portion |
|
|
187.9 |
|
|
|
182.0 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
84.4 |
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
752.2 |
|
|
|
621.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,204.0 |
|
|
|
2,676.5 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
6,907.7 |
|
|
|
5,865.1 |
|
Accrued landfill and environmental costs, net of current portion |
|
|
1,433.8 |
|
|
|
1,416.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other long-term tax liabilities |
|
|
975.7 |
|
|
|
1,044.8 |
|
Self-insurance reserves, net of current portion |
|
|
299.6 |
|
|
|
304.5 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
194.5 |
|
|
|
305.5 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 50 shares authorized; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 750 shares authorized; 401.6 and 400.2
issued including shares held in treasury, respectively |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
6,477.1 |
|
|
|
6,431.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,943.5 |
|
|
|
1,890.3 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (25.1 and 16.5 shares, respectively) |
|
|
(763.7 |
) |
|
|
(500.8 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Republic Services, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
7,664.7 |
|
|
|
7,846.5 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,666.7 |
|
|
|
7,848.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
19,682.0 |
|
|
$ |
19,461.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,086.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,066.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,051.5 |
|
|
$ |
4,024.1 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
1,237.8 |
|
|
|
1,218.3 |
|
|
|
2,397.5 |
|
|
|
2,355.1 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
|
|
208.6 |
|
|
|
213.8 |
|
|
|
414.4 |
|
|
|
416.8 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
200.1 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
404.0 |
|
|
|
421.1 |
|
Loss on disposition of assets and impairments, net |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
401.2 |
|
|
|
400.8 |
|
|
|
777.4 |
|
|
|
782.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(111.4 |
) |
|
|
(130.5 |
) |
|
|
(227.1 |
) |
|
|
(265.0 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(199.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201.3 |
) |
|
|
(132.3 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
91.3 |
|
|
|
270.3 |
|
|
|
351.3 |
|
|
|
386.5 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
110.4 |
|
|
|
147.0 |
|
|
|
161.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
46.2 |
|
|
|
159.9 |
|
|
|
204.3 |
|
|
|
225.1 |
|
Net loss (income) attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Republic Services,
Inc. |
|
$ |
46.5 |
|
|
$ |
159.7 |
|
|
$ |
204.7 |
|
|
$ |
224.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to Republic
Services, Inc. stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
378.2 |
|
|
|
382.5 |
|
|
|
380.2 |
|
|
|
382.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Republic
Services, Inc. stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares outstanding |
|
|
380.2 |
|
|
|
384.7 |
|
|
|
382.1 |
|
|
|
384.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Republic Services, Inc. Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Income (Loss), |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Net of Tax |
|
|
Interests |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
7,848.9 |
|
|
|
400.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,431.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,890.3 |
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(500.8 |
) |
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
Net income |
|
|
204.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
|
(151.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
|
|
(262.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
(262.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
7,666.7 |
|
|
|
401.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,477.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,943.5 |
|
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(763.7 |
) |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
204.3 |
|
|
$ |
225.1 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
|
|
256.0 |
|
|
|
255.9 |
|
Landfill depletion and amortization |
|
|
120.8 |
|
|
|
125.7 |
|
Amortization of intangible and other assets |
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
Non-cash interest expense debt |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
Non-cash interest expense other |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(58.3 |
) |
|
|
(58.3 |
) |
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of adjustments |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Asset impairments |
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
Gain on disposition of assets, net |
|
|
(29.8 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Other non-cash items |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(47.6 |
) |
|
|
(43.9 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(33.1 |
) |
|
|
(62.8 |
) |
Restructuring and synergy related expenditures |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
Capping, closure and post-closure expenditures |
|
|
(35.2 |
) |
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
Remediation expenditures |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
795.6 |
|
|
|
594.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(481.7 |
) |
|
|
(385.4 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Cash used in acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Cash proceeds from divestitures, net of cash divested |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
(76.0 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(472.2 |
) |
|
|
(449.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
819.5 |
|
|
|
1,020.2 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of discount |
|
|
1,844.9 |
|
|
|
1,499.4 |
|
Payments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
(2,228.3 |
) |
|
|
(2,494.8 |
) |
Premiums paid on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(86.8 |
) |
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
Fees paid to issue and retire senior notes and certain hedging relationships |
|
|
(58.6 |
) |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Purchases of common stock for treasury |
|
|
(262.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(152.5 |
) |
|
|
(144.9 |
) |
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(137.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
232.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
320.5 |
|
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Republic Services, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its subsidiaries (also referred to
collectively as Republic, we, us, our, or the company in this report) is the second largest
provider of non-hazardous solid waste collection, transfer, recycling and disposal services in the
United States, as measured by revenue. We manage and evaluate our operations through four
geographic regions Eastern, Midwestern, Southern, and Western, which we have identified as our
reportable segments.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Republic and
its wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). We account for investments in entities in
which we do not have a controlling financial interest under either the equity method or cost method
of accounting, as appropriate. Our investments in variable interest entities are not material to
our consolidated financial statements.
We have prepared these unaudited consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). All significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated. Certain information related to our organization, significant
accounting policies and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP has been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, these
financial statements include all adjustments that, unless otherwise disclosed, are of a normal
recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Operating results for interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for a full year. You should read these
interim financial statements in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
For comparative purposes, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current year presentation.
Managements Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing our financial statements, we include numerous estimates and assumptions that affect
the accounting, recognition and disclosure of assets, liabilities, stockholders equity, revenue
and expenses. We must make these estimates and assumptions because certain information that we use
is dependent on future events, cannot be calculated with a high degree of precision from data
available or simply cannot be readily calculated based on generally accepted methodologies. In some
cases, these estimates are particularly difficult to determine and we must exercise significant
judgment. In preparing our financial statements, the most difficult, subjective and complex
estimates and assumptions that deal with the greatest amount of uncertainty relate to our
accounting for our long-lived assets, landfill development costs, final capping, closure and
post-closure costs and the recoverability of goodwill; our valuation allowances for accounts
receivable and deferred tax assets; our liabilities for potential litigation, claims and
assessments; and our liabilities for environmental remediation, employee benefit plans, stock-based
compensation, deferred taxes, uncertain tax positions and self-insurance. Each of these items is
discussed in more detail in our description of our significant accounting policies in Note 2,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Our actual results may differ
significantly from our estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Goodwill Impairment Test
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance
which modifies the requirements of Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with
zero or negative carrying amounts. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2011, and it did
not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Other Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the presentation of comprehensive
income. The new standard requires the presentation of comprehensive income, the components of net
income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new standard also
7
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
requires presentation of adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive
income to net income in the statement where the components of net income and the components of
other comprehensive income are presented. We will adopt this new presentation standard as of the
beginning of 2012. The adoption of this standard will only impact the presentation of our financial
statements and will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
2. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITION OF ASSETS AND ASSET IMPAIRMENTS
Acquisitions
We acquired various solid waste businesses
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. These
acquisitions resulted in cash used of $28.0 million and $0.8
million, respectively. The
purchase price paid for these acquisitions and the allocation of the purchase price as of June 30
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
$ |
28.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
Fair value of operations surrendered |
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Holdbacks |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
76.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Other liabilities, net |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed |
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price to be allocated |
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess purchase price to be allocated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocated |
|
$ |
35.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Substantially all of the goodwill and intangible assets recorded for these acquisitions are
deductible for tax purposes.
Disposition of Assets and Asset Impairments
We disposed of various solid waste assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
These divestitures resulted in cash proceeds of $5.5 million and $10.4 million, respectively.
The components of the loss on disposition of assets and impairments, net during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Gain on the disposition of businesses |
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
Southern Region landfill asset impairment |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
Western Region asset impairment |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
All other, net |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposition of assets and impairments, net |
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We disposed of businesses in three markets in our Southern Region during the three months ended
June 30, 2011, resulting in a gain of $17.1 million. In connection with the disposition of these
businesses, we closed a landfill site resulting in an asset impairment charge of $28.5 million for
the remaining landfill assets and the acceleration of capping, closure and post-closure costs.
8
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Separately, during the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded asset impairments of $7.2
million for expected losses on the divestiture of certain businesses and related goodwill in our
Western Region.
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Goodwill
A summary of the activity and balances in goodwill accounts by operating segment is as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
2011 |
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
2,791.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
2,794.3 |
|
Midwestern |
|
|
2,129.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,134.4 |
|
Southern |
|
|
2,721.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(19.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
2,704.3 |
|
Western |
|
|
3,012.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
3,007.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,655.3 |
|
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
(24.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
10,640.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
2010 |
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
2,818.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
2,817.1 |
|
Midwestern |
|
|
2,118.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
2,117.1 |
|
Southern |
|
|
2,724.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
2,723.2 |
|
Western |
|
|
3,005.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
3,004.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,667.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
|
$ |
10,661.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets, Net
Other intangible assets, net, include values assigned to customer relationships, franchise
agreements, other municipal agreements, non-compete agreements and trade names, and are amortized
over periods ranging from 2 to 23 years.
A summary of the activity and balances by intangible asset type is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Intangible Assets |
|
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Intangibles at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Charged |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
to Expense |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
Customer relationships, franchise
and other municipal agreements |
|
$ |
537.1 |
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
558.7 |
|
|
$ |
(130.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(31.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(161.9 |
) |
|
$ |
396.8 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
14.5 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
(41.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(42.7 |
) |
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
642.9 |
|
|
$ |
24.5 |
|
|
$ |
667.4 |
|
|
$ |
(191.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(36.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(228.2 |
) |
|
$ |
439.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Intangible Assets |
|
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Intangibles at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
to |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Charged |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
to Expense |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Customer relationships,
franchise
and other municipal agreements |
|
$ |
521.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
521.6 |
|
|
$ |
(70.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(29.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(100.3 |
) |
|
$ |
421.3 |
|
Trade names |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
20.5 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Other intangibles assets |
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
621.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
622.0 |
|
|
$ |
(121.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(34.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(156.3 |
) |
|
$ |
465.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
4. OTHER ASSETS
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
A summary of prepaid expenses and other current assets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Inventories |
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
31.3 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
Other non-trade receivables |
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
169.6 |
|
|
$ |
207.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-trade receivables include the fair value of our interest rate swaps of $1.0 million and
$5.2 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Other current assets include
the fair value of fuel and commodity hedges of $4.6 million and $3.5 million as of June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Other Assets
A summary of other assets as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
$ |
57.9 |
|
|
$ |
41.1 |
|
Deferred compensation plan |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
Notes and other receivables |
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Reinsurance receivable |
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
78.5 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
260.2 |
|
|
$ |
237.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. OTHER LIABILITIES
Other Accrued Liabilities
A summary of other accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Accrued payroll and benefits |
|
$ |
169.9 |
|
|
$ |
158.4 |
|
Accrued fees and taxes |
|
|
119.0 |
|
|
|
111.8 |
|
Self-insurance reserves, current portion |
|
|
121.0 |
|
|
|
112.7 |
|
Accrued dividends |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
Synergy incentive plan |
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax liabilities |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liabilities |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Accrued professional fees and legal settlement reserves |
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
752.2 |
|
|
$ |
621.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities include the fair value of fuel and commodity hedges of $7.2 million and
$8.4 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
10
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
We expect to pay amounts earned under the synergy incentive plan during the first quarter of 2012.
The synergy incentive plan was fully accrued and was included in Other Long-Term Liabilities as of
December 31, 2010 in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Other Long-Term Liabilities
A summary of other long-term liabilities as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Deferred compensation liability |
|
$ |
37.2 |
|
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
Pension and other postretirement liabilities |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
Contingent legal liabilities |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
105.8 |
|
Ceded insurance reserves |
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
Synergy incentive plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
194.5 |
|
|
$ |
305.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Insurance Reserves
In general, our self-insurance reserves are recorded on an undiscounted basis. However, the
self-insurance liabilities we acquired in the acquisition of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. (Allied)
have been recorded at our estimate of fair value, and, therefore, have been discounted to present
value using a rate of 9.75%. Discounted reserves are accreted to interest expense through the
period they are paid.
Our liabilities for unpaid and incurred but not reported claims at June 30, 2011 (which includes
claims for workers compensation, general liability, vehicle liability and employee health care
benefits) were $420.6 million under our current risk management program and are included in other
accrued liabilities and self-insurance reserves in our consolidated balance sheets. While the
ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on future developments, we believe recorded
reserves are adequate to cover the future payment of claims. However, it is possible that recorded
reserves may not be adequate to cover the future payment of claims. Adjustments, if any, to
estimates recorded resulting from ultimate claim payments will be reflected in our consolidated
statements of income in the periods in which such adjustments are known.
Accrued Liabilities Associated with the Allied Acquisition
We evaluated our operating contracts and leases acquired from Allied and recorded liabilities for
unfavorable contract and lease exit costs. The underlying lease agreements and contracts have
remaining non-cancellable terms ranging from 1 to 21 years.
The following tables reflect activity during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 associated with unfavorable contracts and lease
exit liabilities included in other accrued liabilities (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Payments / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2011 |
|
Unfavorable contracts |
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
(5.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
Lease exit costs |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42.6 |
|
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.9 |
) |
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Payments / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2010 |
|
Unfavorable contracts |
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
43.6 |
|
Lease exit costs |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
55.4 |
|
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. LANDFILL AND ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS
As of June 30, 2011, we owned or operated 193 active solid waste landfills with total available
disposal capacity of approximately 4.8 billion in-place cubic yards. Additionally, we currently
have post-closure responsibility for 130 closed landfills.
Accrued Landfill and Environmental Costs
A summary of landfill and environmental liabilities as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Landfill final capping, closure and post-closure liabilities |
|
$ |
1,066.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,046.5 |
|
Remediation |
|
|
555.4 |
|
|
|
552.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,621.7 |
|
|
|
1,598.6 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(187.9 |
) |
|
|
(182.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
1,433.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,416.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Capping, Closure and Post-Closure Costs
The following table summarizes the activity in our asset retirement obligation liabilities, which
includes liabilities for final capping, closure and post-closure, for the six months ended June 30
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Asset retirement obligation liabilities, beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,046.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,074.5 |
|
Non-cash additions |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
Acquisitions and other adjustments |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Asset retirement obligation adjustments |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
Payments |
|
|
(35.2 |
) |
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation liabilities, end of period |
|
|
1,066.3 |
|
|
|
1,094.2 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(96.7 |
) |
|
|
(123.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
969.6 |
|
|
$ |
970.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annually, in the fourth quarter, we review our calculations for asset retirement obligations.
However, if there are significant changes in the facts and circumstances related to a site during
the year, we will update our assumptions prospectively in the period that all the relevant facts
and circumstances are known.
The fair value of assets that are legally restricted for purposes of collateralizing certain of our
final capping, closure and post-closure obligations was $50.7 million and $59.1 million as of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Such assets are included in restricted cash and
marketable securities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
We accrue for remediation costs when they become probable and can be reasonably estimated. We
believe that the amounts accrued for remediation costs are adequate. There can sometimes be a range
of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with remediation of a site. In these cases, we use
the amount within the range that constitutes our best estimate. If no amount within the range
appears to be a better estimate than any other, we use the amount that is at the low end of such
range. It is reasonably possible that we will need
12
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
to adjust the liabilities recorded for
remediation to reflect the effects of new or additional information, to the extent such information
impacts the costs, timing or duration of the required actions. If we used the reasonably possible
high ends of our ranges, our aggregate potential remediation liability at June 30, 2011 would be
approximately $141 million higher than the amounts recorded. Future changes in our estimates of the
cost, timing or duration of the required actions could have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The following table summarizes the activity in our environmental remediation liabilities for the
six months ended June 30 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Remediation liabilities, beginning of year |
|
$ |
552.1 |
|
|
$ |
554.1 |
|
Acquisitions and other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remediation liabilities, end of period |
|
|
555.4 |
|
|
|
549.3 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
464.2 |
|
|
$ |
447.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a discussion of certain of our significant remediation matters:
Countywide Landfill. In September 2009, Republic Services of Ohio II, LLC entered into Final
Findings and Orders with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency that require us to implement a
comprehensive operation and maintenance program to manage the remediation area at the Countywide
Recycling and Disposal Facility (Countywide). The remediation liability for Countywide recorded as
of June 30, 2011 is $63.9 million, of which $4.6 million is expected to be paid during the next
twelve months. We believe the reasonably possible range of loss for remediation costs is $55
million to $76 million.
West Contra Costa County Landfill. In 2006, we were issued an Enforcement Order by the California
Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) for the Class 1 Hazardous waste cell at the West
Contra Costa County Landfill (West County). Subsequently, we entered into a Consent Agreement with
DTSC in 2007 in which we agreed to undertake certain remedial actions. The remediation liability
for West County recorded as of June 30, 2011 is $45.7 million, of which $2.4 million is expected to
be paid during the next twelve months. We believe the reasonably possible range of loss for
remediation costs is $36 million to $62 million.
Sunrise Landfill. In August 2008, Republic Services of Southern Nevada (RSSN), signed a Consent
Decree with the EPA, the Bureau of Land Management and Clark County, Nevada related to the Sunrise
Landfill. Under the Consent Decree, RSSN has agreed to perform certain remedial actions at the
Sunrise Landfill for which RSSN and Clark County were otherwise jointly and severally liable. The
remediation liability for Sunrise recorded as of June 30, 2011 is $36.8 million, of which $24.0
million is expected to be paid during the next twelve months. We believe the reasonably possible
range of loss for remediation costs is $28 million to $43 million.
Congress Landfill. In August 2010, Congress Development Company agreed with the State of Illinois
to have a Final Consent Order (Final Order) entered by the Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County.
Pursuant to the Final Order, we have agreed to continue to implement certain remedial activities at
the Congress Landfill. The remediation liability recorded as of June 30, 2011 is $83.7 million, of
which $8.0 million is expected to be paid during the next twelve months. We believe the reasonably
possible range of loss for remediation costs is $44 million to $144 million.
It is reasonably possible that we will need to adjust the liabilities noted above to reflect the
effects of new or additional information, to the extent that such information impacts the costs,
timing or duration of the required actions. Future changes in our estimates of the costs, timing or
duration of the required actions could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Environmental Operating Costs
In the normal course of business, we incur various operating costs associated with environmental
compliance. These costs include, among other things, leachate treatment and disposal, methane gas
and groundwater monitoring and systems maintenance, interim cap
13
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
maintenance, costs associated with
the application of daily cover materials, and the legal and administrative costs of ongoing
environmental compliance. These costs are expensed as costs of operations in the period in which
they are incurred.
7. DEBT
Our notes payable, capital leases and long-term debt as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are
listed in the following table in millions, and are presented net of unamortized discounts,
adjustments to fair value related to hedging transactions and the unamortized portion of
adjustments to fair value recorded in purchase accounting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
$1.75 billion Revolver due 2013, amended to $1.25 billion due 2013 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
$1.0 billion Revolver due 2012, amended to $1.25 billion due 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 5.750%, due February 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
261.7 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 6.375%, due April 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
215.1 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 6.750%, due August 2011 |
|
|
388.0 |
|
|
|
392.0 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 7.125%, due May 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
535.5 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 6.875%, due June 2017 |
|
|
669.1 |
|
|
|
663.9 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 3.800%, due May 2018 |
|
|
699.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 5.500%, due September 2019 |
|
|
646.0 |
|
|
|
645.8 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 5.000%, due March 2020 |
|
|
849.9 |
|
|
|
849.9 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 5.250%, due November 2021 |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
600.0 |
|
Debentures, fixed interest rate of 9.250%, due May 2021 |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
93.4 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 4.750%, due May 2023 |
|
|
548.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 6.086%, due March 2035 |
|
|
250.1 |
|
|
|
249.8 |
|
Debentures, fixed interest rate of 7.400%, due September 2035 |
|
|
132.0 |
|
|
|
267.6 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 6.200%, due March 2040 |
|
|
649.5 |
|
|
|
649.5 |
|
Senior notes, fixed interest rate of 5.700%, due May 2041 |
|
|
596.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings; fixed and floating
interest
rates ranging from 0.08% to 8.25%; maturities ranging from 2013 to 2035 |
|
|
1,151.7 |
|
|
|
1,151.8 |
|
Other debt unsecured and secured by real property, equipment and other
assets;
interest rates ranging from 5.00% to 11.90% maturing through 2042 |
|
|
91.0 |
|
|
|
92.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
7,305.5 |
|
|
|
6,743.6 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(397.8 |
) |
|
|
(878.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
6,907.7 |
|
|
$ |
5,865.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we completed refinancing transactions
that resulted in cash paid for premiums and professional fees to repurchase outstanding debt as
well as the non-cash write-off of unamortized debt discounts and deferred issuance costs:
14
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid |
|
|
Non-cash |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Loss on |
|
|
Loss on |
|
|
Loss on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Repaid |
|
|
of Debt |
|
|
of Debt |
|
|
of Debt |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$99.5 million 9.250% debentures due May 2021 |
|
First |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Credit Facilities |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
$600.0 million 7.125% senior notes due May 2016 |
|
Second |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
$99.5 million 9.250% debentures due May 2021 |
|
Second |
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
$360.0 million 7.400% debentures due September 2035 |
|
Second |
|
|
182.7 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
Ineffective portion of interest rate lock settlements |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable securitization program |
|
First |
|
$ |
300.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$425.0 million 6.125% senior notes due February 2014 |
|
First |
|
|
425.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
$600.0 million 7.250% senior notes due March 2015 |
|
First |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
101.8 |
|
|
$ |
132.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facilities
In April 2011, we amended and restated our $1.0 billion revolving credit facility due April 2012 (the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility) to increase the borrowing capacity to $1.25 billion and to
extend the maturity to April 2016. The Amended and Restated Credit Facility includes a feature that
will allow us to increase availability, at our option, by an aggregate amount up to $500 million
through increased commitments from existing lenders or the addition of new lenders. At our option,
borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility bear interest at a Base Rate, or a
Eurodollar Rate, plus an applicable margin based on our Debt Ratings (all as defined in the
agreements). Substantially all of our subsidiaries guarantee all obligations under the Amended and
Restated Credit Facility.
Contemporaneous with the execution of the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, we entered into
Amendment No. 2 to our existing $1.75 billion credit facility (the Existing Credit Facility and,
together with the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, the Credit Facilities), to reduce the
commitments under the Existing Credit Facility to $1.25 billion and conform certain terms of the
Existing Credit Facility with those of the Amended and Restated Credit Facility. Amendment No. 2
does not extend the maturity date under the Existing Credit Facility, which matures in September
2013. Substantially all of our subsidiaries continue to guarantee all obligations under the
Existing Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2010, the interest rate for our borrowings under our Credit Facilities was
1.56%. Our Credit Facilities also are subject to facility fees based on applicable rates defined in
the agreements and the aggregate commitments, regardless of usage. Availability under our Credit
Facilities can be used for working capital, capital expenditures, letters of credit and other
general corporate purposes. The agreements governing our Credit Facilities require us to maintain
certain financial and other covenants. We may pay dividends and repurchase common stock provided
that we are in compliance with these covenants. We had no borrowings under our Credit Facilities at
June 30, 2011. We had $75.0 million of Eurodollar Rate borrowings as of December 31, 2010. We had
$923.4 million and $1,037.5 million of letters of credit utilizing availability under our Credit
Facilities, leaving $1,576.6 million and
$1,637.5 million of availability under our Credit Facilities, at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. We were in compliance with the covenants under our Credit Facilities at June
30, 2011.
Senior Notes and Debentures
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we issued $700.0 million of 3.800% senior notes due
2018 (the 3.800% Notes), $550.0 million of 4.750% senior notes due 2023 (the 4.750% Notes) and
$600.0 million of 5.700% senior notes due 2041 (the 5.700% Notes, and together with the 3.800%
Notes and the 4.750% Notes, the Notes). The Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and
are guaranteed by each of our subsidiaries that also guarantees the Credit Facilities. These
guarantees are general senior unsecured obligations of our subsidiary guarantors. We used the net
proceeds from the Notes as follows (i) $621.4 million to fund the redemption of our $600.0 million
7.125% senior notes maturing in 2016; (ii) $81.6 million to purchase $59.2 million of our
subsidiary Browning-Ferris Industries, LLCs 9.250% debentures maturing in 2021; (iii) $221.8
million to purchase $180.7 million of
15
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
our subsidiary Browning-Ferris Industries, LLCs 7.400%
debentures maturing in 2035; (iv) $619.0 million to repay borrowings under our revolving credit
facilities; and (v) the remainder for general corporate purposes.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, our 6.375% senior notes matured. We used cash on hand
and incremental borrowings under our Credit Facilities to repay $216.9 million of principal due on
these notes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, our 5.750% senior notes matured. We used cash on hand
and incremental borrowings under our Credit Facilities to repay $262.9 million of principal due on
these notes.
In March 2010, we issued $850.0 million of 5.00% senior notes due 2020 and $650.0 million of 6.20%
senior notes due 2040 (the 2020 and 2040 Notes). We used the net proceeds to retire
certain outstanding debt and to reduce amounts outstanding under our Credit Facilities and for
general corporate purposes.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our senior notes and debentures totaled $6,062.8 million
and $5,424.2 million, respectively, net of unamortized discounts and adjustments to fair value
recorded in purchase accounting for the debt assumed from Allied of $163.6 million and $282.9
million, respectively, which is being amortized over the remaining term of the notes, and
adjustments to fair value related to our interest rate swap agreements of $1.0 million and $5.2
million, respectively.
Tax-Exempt Financings
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had $1,151.7 million and $1,151.8 million,
respectively, of fixed and variable rate tax-exempt financings outstanding with maturities ranging
from 2012 to 2035. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total of the unamortized
adjustment to fair value recorded in purchase accounting for the tax-exempt financings assumed from
Allied was $20.6 million and $21.9 million, respectively, which is being amortized to interest
expense over the remaining terms of the debt.
Approximately two-thirds of our tax-exempt financings are remarketed quarterly, weekly or daily by
a remarketing agent to effectively maintain a variable yield. Certain of these variable rate
tax-exempt financings are credit enhanced with letters of credit having terms in excess of one year
issued by banks with credit ratings of AA or better. The holders of the bonds can put them back to
the remarketing agent at the end of each interest period. To date, the remarketing agents have been
able to remarket our variable rate unsecured tax-exempt bonds. These bonds have been classified as
long term because of our ability and intent to refinance these bonds using availability under our
revolving Credit Facilities, if necessary.
As of June 30, 2011, we had $160.1 million of restricted cash and marketable securities, of which
$29.2 million represented proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt
financings and will be used to fund capital expenditures under the terms of the agreements.
Restricted cash also includes amounts held in trust as a financial guarantee of our performance.
Other Debt
Other debt includes capital lease liabilities of $90.0 million and $91.8 million as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, with maturities ranging from 2011 to 2042.
Fair Value of Debt
The fair value of our fixed rate senior notes using quoted market rates was $6.5 billion and $6.0
billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The carrying value of our fixed rate
senior notes was $6.1 billion and $5.4 billion at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. The carrying amounts of our remaining notes payable and tax-exempt financings
approximate fair value because interest rates are variable and, accordingly, approximate current
market rates for instruments with similar risk and maturities. The fair value of our debt is
determined as of the balance sheet date and is subject to change.
Guarantees
Substantially all of our subsidiaries have guaranteed our obligations under the Credit Facilities.
Substantially all of our subsidiaries guarantee each series of senior notes issued by our parent
company, Republic Services, Inc. Our parent company and substantially all of our subsidiaries
guarantee each series of senior notes issued by our subsidiary Allied Waste North America, Inc.
(AWNA notes) and each series of senior notes issued by our subsidiary Browning-Ferris Industries,
LLC
16
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(successor to Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.) (BFI notes). All of these guarantees would be
automatically released upon the release of our subsidiaries from their guarantee obligations under
the Credit Facilities, except the guarantee of Allied in the case of the AWNA notes, and the
guarantees of Allied and Allied Waste North America, Inc. in the case of the BFI notes.
We have guaranteed some of the tax-exempt bonds of our subsidiaries. If a subsidiary fails to meet
its obligations associated with tax-exempt bonds as they come due, we will be required to perform
under the related guarantee agreement.
No additional liability has been recorded for these guarantees mentioned above because the
underlying obligations are reflected in our consolidated balance sheets.
Interest Rate Swap and Lock Agreements
Our ability to obtain financing through the capital markets is a key component of our financial
strategy. Historically, we have managed risk associated with executing this strategy, particularly
as it relates to fluctuations in interest rates, by using a combination of fixed and floating rate
debt. We also entered into interest rate swap agreements to manage risk associated with
fluctuations in interest rates. The swap agreements have a total notional value of $210.0 million
and mature in August 2011. This maturity is identical to our unsecured notes that also mature in
2011. Under the swap agreements, we pay interest at floating rates based on changes in LIBOR and
receive interest at a fixed rate of 6.75%. We have designated these agreements as hedges of changes
in the fair value of our fixed-rate debt. We have determined that these agreements qualify for the
short-cut method and, therefore, changes in the fair value of the agreements are assumed to be
perfectly effective in hedging changes in the fair value of our fixed rate debt due to changes in
interest rates.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, interest rate swap agreements are reflected at their
fair value of $1.0 million and $5.2 million, respectively, in other non-trade receivables and as an
adjustment to notes payable and current maturities of long term debt in our consolidated balance
sheets.
The following table summarizes the reduction to interest expense due to periodic settlements of
active swap agreements on our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction to interest expense |
|
|
due to periodic settlements |
|
|
of active swap agreements |
Consolidated Statement of Income Classification |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Interest expense |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
From time to time, we enter into treasury and interest rate locks for the purpose of managing
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates in anticipation of future debt issuances. During the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we entered into a number of interest rate lock agreements
having an aggregate notional amount of $725.0 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 3.10%
to 4.61% to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates in anticipation of the planned
issuance of the Notes. Upon issuance of the Notes in the second quarter of 2011, we terminated the
interest rate locks and paid $36.5 million to the counterparties. The effective portion of the
interest rate locks, recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, was $36.2
million, or $21.2 million net of tax. The effective portion of the interest rate locks will be
amortized as an increase to interest expense over the life of the issued debt. We expect to
amortize $1.4 million over the next twelve months as a yield adjustment of the Notes. This
transaction was accounted for as a cash flow hedge. As of June 30, 2011, no interest rate lock cash
flow hedges were outstanding.
During the first quarter of 2010, we entered into interest rate lock agreements having an
aggregate notional amount of $500.0 million to hedge interest rates in connection with the issuance
of the 2020 and 2040 Notes. Upon issuance of these notes, we terminated the interest rate locks and
paid approximately $7.0 million to the counterparties. The effective portion of the interest rate
locks, recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, was $6.4 million or $3.7
million net of tax. The effective portion of the
17
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
interest rate locks will be amortized as an
increase to interest expense over the life of the issued debt, of which $0.3 million is scheduled
to be amortized over the next twelve months as a yield adjustment to the 2020 and 2040 Notes.
The following table summarizes the gain (loss) on our interest rate locks (settlement and
amortization) included in comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, net of
tax (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
Derivatives (Effective Portion) |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Interest rate locks |
|
$ |
(13.6 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Interest rate locks |
|
$ |
(21.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
8. INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate, exclusive of noncontrolling interests, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 was 49.3% and 41.8%, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our
effective tax rate was negatively impacted by the write-off of book goodwill with no corresponding
tax basis and the impact of lower pre-tax book earnings as a result
of the loss on extinguishment of debt. For the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 our effective tax rate was 40.9% and 41.8%, respectively. We
record income tax expense based upon our anticipated full year effective income tax rate.
Income
taxes paid, net of refunds received were $107.4 million and $284.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively.
We are subject to income tax in the United States and Puerto Rico, as well as income tax in
multiple state jurisdictions. We have also acquired Allieds open tax periods as a result of the
2008 merger. Consequently, we are currently under examination or administrative review by various
state and federal taxing authorities for certain tax years, including federal income tax audits for
calendar years 2000 through 2009.
We recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in the
consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2011, we have accrued a liability for penalties
of $0.8 million and interest (including interest on penalties) of $106.0 million related to our
uncertain tax positions.
We believe that the liabilities for uncertain tax positions recorded are adequate. However, during
the next twelve months we believe it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax
benefits will increase or decrease. We are unable to estimate a range at this time. A significant
assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Exchange of Partnership Interests
In April 2002, Allied exchanged minority partnership interests in four waste-to-energy facilities
for majority partnership interests in equipment purchasing businesses, which are now wholly owned
subsidiaries. In November 2008, the IRS issued a formal disallowance to Allied contending that the
exchange was instead a sale on which a corresponding gain should have been recognized. This issue
is currently before the Appeals division of the IRS. We believe our position is supported by
relevant technical authorities and strong business purpose. Although we intend to vigorously defend
our position on this matter, if the exchange is treated as a sale, we estimate it could have a
potential federal and state cash tax impact of $156.2 million plus accrued interest through June
30, 2011 of approximately $78.0 million. In addition, the IRS has asserted a penalty of 20% of the
additional income tax due. At June 30, 2011, the amount of the asserted penalty and penalty-related
interest was approximately $49.8 million. The potential tax and interest (but not penalty or
penalty-related interest) for this matter have been fully reserved in our consolidated balance
sheets. The successful assertion by the IRS of penalty and penalty-related interest in connection
with this matter could have an adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations or cash
flows.
18
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Methane Gas
As part of its examination of Allieds 2000 through 2008 federal income tax returns, the IRS
reviewed Allieds treatment of costs associated with its landfill operations. As a result of this
review, the IRS has proposed that certain landfill costs be allocated to the collection and control
of methane gas that is naturally produced within the landfill. The IRS position is that the
methane gas produced by a landfill is a joint product resulting from operation of the landfill and,
therefore, these costs should not be expensed until the methane gas is sold or otherwise disposed.
We are contesting this issue at the Appeals Office of the IRS. We believe we have several
meritorious defenses, including the fact that methane gas is not actively produced for sale by us
but rather arises naturally in the context of providing disposal services. Therefore, we believe
that the resolution of this issue will not have a material adverse impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
9. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Available Shares
In March 2011, our Board of Directors approved the Amended and Restated Republic Services, Inc.
2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the Amended and Restated Plan). The Amended and Restated Plan was
ratified by the Companys stockholders in May 2011. We currently have 22.0 million shares of common
stock reserved for future grants under our Amended and Restated Plan.
Stock Options
We use a
binomial option pricing model to fair value our stock option grants. We recognize
compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately
vesting portion of the award, or to the employees retirement eligible date, if earlier. Expected
volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical
rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option. The risk-free
interest rate is based on Federal Reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to
the expected term of the option. We use historical data to estimate future option exercises,
forfeitures and expected life of the options. When appropriate, separate groups of employees that
have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock
options granted were $5.35 and $5.25 per option, respectively, which were calculated using the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Expected volatility |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Contractual life (in years) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Expected forfeiture rate |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011:
19
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
Price per Share |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
$ |
24.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
29.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
$ |
22.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
30.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.04 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
24.90 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
49.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, compensation expense for stock options was $7.1
million and $6.2 million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2011, total unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options
was $17.5 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.
Other Stock Awards
The following table summarizes the restricted stock unit and restricted stock activity for the six
months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units and Shares of |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock |
|
|
Fair Value per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Unissued at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
849.3 |
|
|
$ |
26.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
169.4 |
|
|
$ |
30.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and Issued |
|
|
(134.8 |
) |
|
$ |
25.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
$ |
24.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unissued at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
875.8 |
|
|
$ |
27.21 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
27.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and unissued at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
477.8 |
|
|
$ |
27.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our non-employee directors were awarded 82,500
restricted stock units, which vested immediately. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we
awarded 76,699 restricted stock units to executives that vest in four equal annual installments
beginning on the anniversary date of the original grant. In addition, 10,217 restricted stock units
were earned as dividend equivalents. The restricted stock units do not carry any voting or dividend
rights, except the right to receive additional restricted stock units in lieu of dividends.
The fair value of restricted stock units and restricted stock is based on the closing market price
on the date of the grant. The compensation expense related to restricted stock units and restricted
stock is amortized ratably over the vesting period.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, compensation expense related to restricted
stock units and restricted stock totaled $5.0 million and $5.8 million, respectively.
10. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
In November 2010, our board of directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we
may repurchase up to $400.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock. From November 2010
to June 30, 2011, we repurchased 10.1 million shares of our stock for $303.2 million at a weighted
average cost per share of $30.08. We expect to use the remaining funds in this program to
repurchase shares during the remainder of 2011.
We initiated a quarterly cash dividend in July 2003. The dividend has been increased from time to
time thereafter. In July 2011, the board of directors approved an increase in the quarterly
dividend to $0.22 per share. Cash dividends declared were $151.1 million
20
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
and $145.3 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, we recorded a
quarterly dividend payable of $75.3 million to stockholders of record at the close of business on
July 1, 2011.
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc.
by the weighted average number of common shares (including restricted stock and vested but unissued
restricted stock units) outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is based on the
combined weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding which
include, where appropriate, the assumed exercise of employee stock options, unvested restricted
stock and unvested restricted stock units. In computing diluted earnings per share, we utilize the
treasury stock method.
Earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30 are calculated as follows (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
46,500 |
|
|
$ |
159,700 |
|
|
$ |
204,700 |
|
|
$ |
224,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
378,197 |
|
|
|
382,509 |
|
|
|
380,185 |
|
|
|
381,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
46,500 |
|
|
$ |
159,700 |
|
|
$ |
204,700 |
|
|
$ |
224,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
378,197 |
|
|
|
382,509 |
|
|
|
380,185 |
|
|
|
381,968 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase common stock |
|
|
1,826 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
Unvested restricted stock awards |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares outstanding |
|
|
380,166 |
|
|
|
384,710 |
|
|
|
382,073 |
|
|
|
383,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antidilutive securities not included in the diluted
earnings per share calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase common stock |
|
|
3,660 |
|
|
|
3,940 |
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
11. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
A summary of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30 is as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
46.2 |
|
|
$ |
159.9 |
|
|
$ |
204.3 |
|
|
$ |
225.1 |
|
Change in value, settlements and amortization of interest rate locks, net of tax |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Change in value of commodity hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
Change in value of fuel hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Employee benefit plan liability adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
159.7 |
|
|
|
186.2 |
|
|
|
218.1 |
|
Less: comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Republic Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
159.5 |
|
|
$ |
186.6 |
|
|
$ |
217.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
The effective tax rates used to calculate the changes in other comprehensive income shown in the
table above were 41.5% and 42.0% for 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Fuel Hedges
We have entered into multiple swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to mitigate some of
our exposure related to changes in diesel fuel prices. The swaps qualified for, and were designated
as, effective hedges of changes in the prices of forecasted diesel fuel purchases (fuel hedges).
The following table summarizes our outstanding fuel hedges at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in Gallons |
|
Contract Price |
Inception Date |
|
Commencement Date |
|
Termination Date |
|
per Month) |
|
per Gallon |
November 5, 2007 |
|
January 5, 2009 |
|
December 30, 2013 |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
3.28 |
|
March 17, 2008 |
|
January 5, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
March 17, 2008 |
|
January 5, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
September 22, 2008 |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
4.16 - 4.17 |
|
July 10, 2009 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
July 10, 2009 |
|
January 1, 2012 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
If the national U.S. on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel (average price) as
published by the Department of Energy exceeds the contract price per gallon, we receive the
difference between the average price and the contract price (multiplied by the notional gallons)
from the counter-party. If the national U.S. on-highway average price for a gallon of diesel fuel
is less than the contract price per gallon, we pay the difference to the counter-party.
The fair values of our fuel hedges are obtained from third-party counter-parties and are determined
using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices being based on those
observed in underlying markets (Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy). The aggregated fair values of
our outstanding fuel hedges at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were current assets of $2.8
million and $1.6 million, respectively, and current liabilities of $0.3 million and $1.9 million,
respectively, and have been recorded in other current assets and other accrued liabilities in our
consolidated balance sheets, respectively.
The following table summarizes the impact of our fuel hedges on our results of operations and
comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Recognized in |
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion and |
Derivatives in |
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Amount |
|
Amount Excluded |
Cash Flow |
|
OCI on |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of |
|
Excluded from |
|
from |
Hedging |
|
Derivatives |
|
Income |
|
Realized Gain or |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Effectiveness |
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Classification |
|
(Loss) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Fuel hedges |
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
Cost of operations |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
Other expense, net |
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Fuel hedges |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
Cost of operations |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
22
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Recycling Commodity Hedges
Our revenue from sales of recycling commodities is primarily from sales of old corrugated cardboard
(OCC) and old newspaper (ONP). We use derivative instruments such as swaps and costless collars
designated as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to changes in prices of these commodities. We
have entered into multiple agreements related to forecasted OCC and ONP sales. The agreements
qualified for, and were designated as, effective hedges of changes in the prices of certain
forecasted recycling commodity sales (commodity hedges).
The following table summarizes our outstanding commodity swaps at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
Contract Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
(in Short Tons |
|
Per Short |
Inception Date |
|
Commencement Date |
|
Termination Date |
|
Hedged |
|
per Month) |
|
Ton |
December 8, 2009 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
ONP |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
76.00 |
|
December 10, 2009 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
82.00 |
|
December 11, 2009 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
82.00 |
|
January 5, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
ONP |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
84.00 |
|
January 6, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
OCC |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
January 27, 2010 |
|
February 1, 2010 |
|
January 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
September 23, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
ONP |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
95.00 |
|
September 28, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
ONP |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
95.00 |
|
October 11, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
115.00 |
|
If the price per short ton of the hedging instrument (average price) as reported on the Official
Board Market is less than the contract price per short ton, we receive the difference between the
average price and the contract price (multiplied by the notional short tons) from the
counter-party. If the price of the commodity exceeds the contract price per short ton, we pay the
difference to the counter-party.
The fair values of our commodity swaps are obtained from third-party counter-parties and are
determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices being
based on those observed in underlying markets (Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy).
We entered into costless collar agreements on forecasted sales of 21,000 short tons of OCC and ONP
a month. The agreements involve combining a purchased put option giving us the right to sell 21,000
short tons of OCC and ONP monthly at an established floor strike price with a written call option
obligating us to deliver 21,000 short tons of OCC and ONP monthly at an established cap
strike price. The puts and calls have the same settlement dates, are net settled in cash on such
dates and have the same terms to expiration. The contemporaneous combination of options resulted in
no net premium for us and represent costless collars. Under the agreements, no payments would be
made or received by us, as long as the settlement price is between the floor price and cap price.
However, if the settlement price is above the cap, we would be required to pay the counterparty an
amount equal to the excess of the settlement price over the cap times the monthly volumes hedged.
Also, if the settlement price is below the floor, the counterparty would be required to pay us the
deficit of the settlement price below the floor times the monthly volumes hedged. The objective of
these agreements is to reduce the variability of the cash flows of the forecasted sales of OCC and
ONP between two designated strike prices.
The following costless collar hedges were outstanding at June 30, 2011:
23
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor |
|
Cap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
Strike Price |
|
Strike Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction |
|
(in Short Tons |
|
Per Short |
|
Per Short |
Inception Date |
|
Commencement Date |
|
Termination Date |
|
Hedged |
|
per Month) |
|
Ton |
|
Ton |
December 8, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
80.00 |
|
|
$ |
180.00 |
|
December 8, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
86.00 |
|
|
|
210.00 |
|
December 8, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
81.00 |
|
|
|
190.00 |
|
December 8, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
85.00 |
|
|
|
195.00 |
|
December 8, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
87.00 |
|
|
|
195.00 |
|
January 19, 2011 |
|
February 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
|
|
155.00 |
|
January 19, 2011 |
|
February 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
|
|
155.00 |
|
April 15, 2011 |
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
|
|
155.00 |
|
April 15, 2011 |
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
OCC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
|
|
155.00 |
|
April 26, 2011 |
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
ONP |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
|
|
165.00 |
|
April 26, 2011 |
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
|
ONP |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
90.00 |
|
|
|
165.00 |
|
The costless collar hedges are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair values of the
costless collars are obtained from the third-party counter party and are determined using standard
option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based upon forward commodity price
curves in underlying markets (Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy).
The aggregated fair values of the outstanding commodity hedges at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010 were current assets of $1.8 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and current liabilities of
$6.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively, and have been recorded in other current assets and
other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, respectively.
The following table summarizes the impact of our commodity hedges on our results of operations and
comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized |
|
Recognized in |
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Income on Derivative |
|
Income on Derivative |
|
|
or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion |
|
(Ineffective Portion and |
Derivatives in |
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Amount |
|
Amount Excluded |
Cash Flow |
|
OCI on |
|
Statement of |
|
Amount of |
|
Excluded from |
|
from |
Hedging |
|
Derivatives |
|
Income |
|
Realized Gain or |
|
Effectiveness |
|
Effectiveness |
Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
Classification |
|
(Loss) |
|
Testing) |
|
Testing) |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Recycling commodity hedges |
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Recycling commodity hedges |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
Fair Value Measurements
In measuring fair values of assets and liabilities, we use valuation techniques that maximize the
use of observable inputs (Level 1) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs (Level 3). We also
use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability, including assumptions about risk when appropriate.
24
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis include the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Total as of |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
$ |
160.1 |
|
|
$ |
160.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fuel hedges other current assets |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity hedges other current assets |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps other non-trade receivables |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
165.7 |
|
|
$ |
160.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedges other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commodity hedges other accrued liabilities |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
Total as of |
|
|
Markets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
$ |
172.8 |
|
|
$ |
172.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fuel hedges other current assets |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity hedges other current assets |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps other assets |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
181.5 |
|
|
$ |
172.8 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel hedges other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commodity hedges other accrued liabilities |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. SEGMENT REPORTING
Our operations are managed and evaluated through four regions: Eastern, Midwestern, Southern and
Western. These four regions are presented below as our reportable segments. These reportable
segments provide integrated waste management services consisting of collection, transfer, recycling
and disposal of domestic non-hazardous solid waste.
Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is shown in the following tables (in millions):
25
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization, |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Depletion and |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
633.4 |
|
|
$ |
(96.3 |
) |
|
$ |
537.1 |
|
|
$ |
47.6 |
|
|
$ |
136.7 |
|
|
$ |
54.4 |
|
|
$ |
4,450.7 |
|
Midwestern |
|
|
571.3 |
|
|
|
(104.5 |
) |
|
|
466.8 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
3,798.9 |
|
Southern |
|
|
594.6 |
|
|
|
(80.4 |
) |
|
|
514.2 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
4,876.7 |
|
Western |
|
|
664.1 |
|
|
|
(120.2 |
) |
|
|
543.9 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
117.9 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
|
|
5,498.4 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
(60.1 |
) |
|
|
(31.7 |
) |
|
|
1,057.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,492.3 |
|
|
$ |
(405.7 |
) |
|
$ |
2,086.6 |
|
|
$ |
228.1 |
|
|
$ |
401.2 |
|
|
$ |
184.5 |
|
|
$ |
19,682.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
626.6 |
|
|
$ |
(94.4 |
) |
|
$ |
532.2 |
|
|
$ |
52.9 |
|
|
$ |
122.6 |
|
|
$ |
43.9 |
|
|
$ |
4,481.6 |
|
Midwestern |
|
|
567.5 |
|
|
|
(109.8 |
) |
|
|
457.7 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
|
|
3,665.3 |
|
Southern |
|
|
584.7 |
|
|
|
(81.6 |
) |
|
|
503.1 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
119.7 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
4,845.5 |
|
Western |
|
|
671.1 |
|
|
|
(124.8 |
) |
|
|
546.3 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
131.3 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
5,479.9 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
(73.5 |
) |
|
|
(30.5 |
) |
|
|
1,099.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,480.9 |
|
|
$ |
(414.5 |
) |
|
$ |
2,066.4 |
|
|
$ |
234.0 |
|
|
$ |
400.8 |
|
|
$ |
177.0 |
|
|
$ |
19,571.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization, |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Intercompany |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Depletion and |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
1,217.3 |
|
|
$ |
(178.9 |
) |
|
$ |
1,038.4 |
|
|
$ |
99.0 |
|
|
$ |
254.4 |
|
|
$ |
114.3 |
|
|
$ |
4,450.7 |
|
Midwestern |
|
|
1,076.6 |
|
|
|
(190.9 |
) |
|
|
885.7 |
|
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
176.8 |
|
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
3,798.9 |
|
Southern |
|
|
1,165.4 |
|
|
|
(156.6 |
) |
|
|
1,008.8 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
229.9 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
4,876.7 |
|
Western |
|
|
1,306.1 |
|
|
|
(233.4 |
) |
|
|
1,072.7 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
240.9 |
|
|
|
123.9 |
|
|
|
5,498.4 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
54.1 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
(124.6 |
) |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
1,057.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,819.5 |
|
|
$ |
(768.0 |
) |
|
$ |
4,051.5 |
|
|
$ |
453.6 |
|
|
$ |
777.4 |
|
|
$ |
481.7 |
|
|
$ |
19,682.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
1,211.9 |
|
|
$ |
(177.6 |
) |
|
$ |
1,034.3 |
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
250.8 |
|
|
$ |
85.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,481.6 |
|
Midwestern |
|
|
1,070.8 |
|
|
|
(198.2 |
) |
|
|
872.6 |
|
|
|
106.6 |
|
|
|
189.5 |
|
|
|
121.4 |
|
|
|
3,665.3 |
|
Southern |
|
|
1,150.3 |
|
|
|
(157.6 |
) |
|
|
992.7 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
240.3 |
|
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
|
4,845.5 |
|
Western |
|
|
1,315.7 |
|
|
|
(243.6 |
) |
|
|
1,072.1 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
261.9 |
|
|
|
93.2 |
|
|
|
5,479.9 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
|
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
(160.4 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1,099.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,810.7 |
|
|
$ |
(786.6 |
) |
|
$ |
4,024.1 |
|
|
$ |
457.2 |
|
|
$ |
782.1 |
|
|
$ |
385.4 |
|
|
$ |
19,571.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany revenue reflects transactions within and between segments that are generally made on a
basis intended to reflect the market value of such services.
Corporate functions include legal, tax, treasury, information technology, risk management, human
resources, corporate accounts and other typical administrative functions. Capital expenditures for
corporate entities primarily include vehicle inventory acquired but not yet assigned to operating
locations and facilities.
The following table shows our total reported revenue by service line for the three and six months
ended June 30 (in millions of dollars or as a percentage of revenue):
26
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Collection: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
537.6 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
$ |
546.2 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,063.3 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,080.9 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
627.6 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
622.7 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
1,245.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
1,244.2 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
390.6 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
383.2 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
744.2 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
731.3 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total collection |
|
|
1,563.8 |
|
|
|
74.9 |
|
|
|
1,559.1 |
|
|
|
75.5 |
|
|
|
3,069.0 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
3,070.2 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer and disposal |
|
|
766.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,440.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,483.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Intercompany |
|
|
(387.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(732.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(757.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer and disposal, net |
|
|
379.3 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
391.1 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
708.6 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
726.0 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of recycling materials |
|
|
107.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
205.6 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
148.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Other non-core |
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
143.5 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
116.2 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
273.9 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
227.9 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,086.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,066.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,051.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,024.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenue consists primarily of sales of recycled materials and revenue from National Accounts.
National Accounts revenue included in other revenue represents the portion of revenue generated
from nationwide contracts in markets outside our operating areas, and, as such, the associated
waste handling services are subcontracted to local operators. Consequently, substantially all of
this revenue is offset with related subcontract costs which are recorded in cost of operations.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
We are subject to extensive and evolving laws and regulations and have implemented our own
safeguards to respond to regulatory requirements. In the normal course of conducting our
operations, we become involved in legal proceedings. Some of these actions
may result in fines, penalties or judgments against us, which may impact earnings and cash flows
for a particular period. Although we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any legal matter with
certainty, except as described below or in Note 8, Income Taxes, in the discussion of our
outstanding tax dispute with the IRS, we do not believe that the outcome of our pending legal
proceedings will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
As used herein, legal proceedings refers to litigation and similar claims against us and our
subsidiaries, excluding: (i) ordinary course accidents, general commercial liability and workers
compensation claims, which are covered by insurance programs, subject to customary deductibles, and
which, together with self-insured employee health care costs, are discussed in Note 5, Other
Liabilities-Self-Insurance Reserves; (ii) tax-related matters, which are discussed in Note 8,
Income Taxes; and (iii) environmental remediation liabilities, which are discussed in Note 6,
Landfill and Environmental Costs.
We accrue for legal proceedings when losses become probable and reasonably estimable. We have
recorded an aggregate accrual of approximately $111 million relating to our outstanding legal
proceedings as of June 30, 2011, including those described herein and others not specifically
identified herein. As of the end of each applicable reporting period, we review each of our legal
proceedings and, where it is probable that a liability has been incurred, we accrue for all
probable and reasonably estimable losses. Where we are able to reasonably estimate a range of
losses we may incur with respect to such a matter, we record an accrual for the amount within the
range that constitutes our best estimate. If we are able to reasonably estimate a range but no
amount within the range appears to be a better estimate than any other, we use the amount that is
the low end of such range. If we used the high ends of such ranges, our aggregate potential
liability would have been approximately $110 million higher than the amount recorded as of June 30,
2011.
Countywide Matters
In September 2009, Republic Services of Ohio II, LLC (Republic-Ohio) entered into Final Findings
and Orders with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency that require us to implement a
comprehensive operation and maintenance program to manage the remediation area at the Countywide
Recycling and Disposal Facility (Countywide). The remediation liability for Countywide recorded
27
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
as of June 30, 2011 is $63.9 million, of which $4.6 million is expected to be paid during
2011. The reasonably possible range of loss for remediation costs is $55 million to $76 million.
In a suit filed on October 8, 2008 in the Tuscarawas County Ohio Court of Common Pleas,
approximately 700 individuals and businesses located in the area around Countywide sued Republic
Services, Inc. and Republic-Ohio for alleged negligence and nuisance. Republic-Ohio has owned and
operated Countywide since February 1, 1999. Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management Ohio, Inc.,
previous owners and operators of Countywide, have been named as defendants as well. Plaintiffs
allege that due to the acceptance of a specific waste stream and operational issues and conditions,
the landfill has generated odors and other unsafe emissions that have impaired the use and value of
their property and may have adverse health effects. A second almost identical lawsuit was filed by
approximately 82 plaintiffs on October 13, 2009 in the Tuscarawas County Ohio Court of Common Pleas
against Republic Services, Inc., Republic-Ohio, Waste Management, Inc., and Waste Management Ohio,
Inc. The court has consolidated the two actions. We have assumed both the defense and the liability
of the Waste Management entities in the consolidated action. The relief requested on behalf of each
plaintiff in the consolidated action is: (1) an award of compensatory damages according to proof in
an amount in excess of $25,000 for each of the three counts of the amended complaint; (2) an award
of punitive damages in the amount of two times compensatory damages, pursuant to applicable
statute, or in such amount as may be awarded at trial for each of the three counts of the amended
complaint; (3) costs for medical screening and monitoring of each plaintiff; (4) interest on the
damages according to law; (5) costs and disbursements of the lawsuit; (6) reasonable fees for
attorneys and expert witnesses; and (7) any other and further relief as the court deems just,
proper and equitable. Plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint on September 9, 2010,
which no longer asserts a claim for medical monitoring. As a result of various dismissals of
plaintiffs, this case presently consists of approximately 600 plaintiffs. Discovery is ongoing. In
February 2011, the court granted our motion to dismiss plaintiffs qualified statutory nuisance
claims. We will continue to vigorously defend against the plaintiffs allegations in the
consolidated action.
Luri Matter
On August 17, 2007, a former employee, Ronald Luri, sued Republic Services, Inc., Republic Services
of Ohio Hauling LLC, Republic Services of Ohio I LLC, Jim Bowen and Ron Krall in the Cuyahoga
County Common Pleas Court in Ohio. Plaintiff alleges that he was unlawfully fired in retaliation
for refusing to discharge or demote three employees who were all over 50 years old. On July 3,
2008, a jury verdict was awarded against us in the amount of $46.6 million, including $43.1 million
in punitive damages. On September 24, 2008, the Court awarded pre-judgment interest of $0.3 million
and attorney fees and litigation costs of $1.1 million. Post-judgment interest accrued at a rate of
8% for 2008 and 5% for 2009, and is accruing at a rate of 4% thereafter. Management anticipates
that post-judgment interest could accrue through the middle of 2012
for a total of up to $9.0 million. We
appealed to the Court of Appeals, and on May 19, 2011 the court reduced the punitive damages award
to $7.0 million. Both sides are now pursuing an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court. It is reasonably possible
that following all appeals a final judgment of liability for compensatory and punitive damages may
be assessed against us related to this matter.
Litigation Related to Fuel and Administrative Fees
On November 20, 2009, Klinglers European Bake Shop & Deli, Inc., filed a complaint against BFI
Waste Services, LLC in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, in which plaintiff complains
about fuel recovery fees and administrative fees charged. The complaint purports to be filed on
behalf of a class of similarly situated plaintiffs in Alabama. This complaint asserts various legal
and equitable theories of recovery and alleges in essence that the fees were not properly
disclosed, were unfair, and were contrary to contract. Class-certification-related discovery is
underway. Plaintiffs deadline for moving for class certification is November 10, 2011. Plaintiff
has not specified the amount of damages sought. Although the range of reasonably possible loss
cannot be estimated, we do not believe that this matter will have a material impact on our
consolidated financial positions, results of operations or cash flows. We will continue to
vigorously defend the claims in this lawsuit.
Contracting Matter
We discovered actions of non-compliance by one of our subsidiaries with the subcontracting
provisions of certain government contracts in one of our markets. We reported the discovery to, and
expect further discussions with, law enforcement authorities and other authorities. Such
non-compliance could result in payments by us in the form of restitution, damages, or penalties, or
the loss of future business in the affected market or markets. Based on the information currently
available to us, including our expectation that our self-disclosure will be viewed favorably by the
applicable authorities, we presently believe that the resolution of the matter, while it may have a
material impact on our results of operations or cash flows in the period in which it is recognized
or paid, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.
28
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Congress Development Landfill Matters
Congress Development Co. (CDC) is a general partnership that owns and operates the Congress
Landfill. The general partners in CDC are our subsidiary, Allied Waste Transportation, Inc. (Allied
Transportation), and an unaffiliated entity, John Sexton Sand & Gravel Corporation (Sexton). Sexton
was the operator of the landfill through early 2007, when Allied Transportation took over as the
operator. The general partners likely will be jointly and severally liable for the costs associated
with the following matters relating to the Congress Landfill.
In August 2010, Congress Development Company agreed with the State of Illinois to have a Final
Consent Order (Final Order) entered by the Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County. Pursuant to the
Final Order, we have agreed to continue to implement certain remedial activities at the Congress
Landfill. The remediation liability recorded as of June 30, 2011 is $83.7 million, of which $8.0
million is expected to be paid during 2011. The reasonably possible range of loss for remediation
costs is $44 million to $144 million.
In a suit originally filed on December 23, 2009 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois and
subsequently amended to add additional plaintiffs, approximately 2,400 plaintiffs sued our
subsidiaries Allied Transportation and Allied Waste Industries, Inc., CDC and Sexton. The
plaintiffs allege bodily injury, property damage and inability to have normal use and enjoyment of
property arising from, among other things, odors and other damages arising from landfill gas
leaking, and they base their claims on negligence, trespass, and nuisance. On April 29, 2011,
plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint to seek punitive damages. Briefing on
that motion is ongoing.
Following the courts order in our favor striking the plaintiffs allegations requesting actual
damages in excess of $50 million and punitive damages in excess of $50 million, the amount of
damages being sought is unspecified. The court entered an order dismissing Allied Waste Industries,
Inc. without prejudice on October 26, 2010. Discovery is ongoing. We intend to vigorously defend
against the plaintiffs allegations in this action.
Livingston Matter
On October 13, 2009, the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, State of
Louisiana, issued its Post Class Certification Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in a lawsuit
alleging nuisance from the activities of the CECOS hazardous waste facility located in Livingston
Parish, Louisiana. The court granted class certification for all those living within a six mile
radius of the CECOS site between the years 1977 and 1990. We have filed a notice of appeal with
respect to the class certification order and oral argument is scheduled for August, 2011. The
parties are working towards resolving the lawsuit through a negotiated settlement. If these efforts
are not successful, we intend to continue to defend this lawsuit vigorously.
Multi-Employer Pension Plans
We contribute to 28 multi-employer pension plans under collective bargaining agreements covering
union-represented employees. Approximately 20% of our total current employees are participants in
such multi-employer plans. These plans generally provide retirement benefits to participants based
on their service to contributing employers. We do not administer these multi-employer plans. In
general, these plans are managed by a board of trustees with the unions appointing certain trustees
and other contributing employers of the plan appointing certain members. We generally are not
represented on the board of trustees.
Furthermore, under current law regarding multi-employer benefit plans, a plans termination, our
voluntary withdrawal (which we consider from time to time), or the mass withdrawal of all
contributing employers from any under-funded, multi-employer pension plan would require us to make
payments to the plan for our proportionate share of the multi-employer plans unfunded vested
liabilities. In the near future, as to any one or more of these plans, we may voluntarily withdraw
from the plan, there may be a mass withdrawal of employees contributing to the plan or the plan may
terminate. We could have adjustments to our estimates for these matters in the near term that could
have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
Restricted Cash and Marketable Securities
Our restricted cash deposits and marketable securities include, among other things, restricted cash
held for capital expenditures under certain debt facilities, restricted cash and marketable
securities used to settle claims related to our self insurance programs, and restricted cash and
marketable securities pledged to regulatory agencies and governmental entities as financial
guarantees of our performance related to our final capping, closure and post-closure obligations at
our landfills, as follows (in millions):
29
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Financing proceeds |
|
$ |
29.2 |
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
Capping, closure and post-closure obligations |
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
Self-insurance |
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
$ |
160.1 |
|
|
$ |
172.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations, other than operating leases and the
financial assurances discussed above, which are not classified as debt. We have no transactions or
obligations with related parties that are not disclosed, consolidated into or reflected in our
reported financial position or results of operations. We have not guaranteed any third-party debt.
14. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We are the primary obligor under certain of the Senior Notes issued by us. Substantially all of our
subsidiaries have jointly and severally guaranteed these notes. All of the subsidiary guarantors
are 100% wholly owned direct or indirect subsidiaries of the parent, and all guarantees are full,
unconditional and joint and several with respect to principal, interest and liquidated damages, if
any. As such, we present condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, condensed consolidating statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 for each of Republic
Services, Inc. (Parent), guarantor subsidiaries and the other non-guarantor subsidiaries with any
consolidating adjustments.
30
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
301.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
320.5 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
845.0 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872.3 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169.6 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
192.8 |
|
|
|
1,224.3 |
|
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,479.6 |
|
Restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
83.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.1 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
6,283.1 |
|
|
|
369.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,702.7 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,640.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,640.2 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
420.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439.2 |
|
Investment and net advances to affiliate |
|
|
15,161.0 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
150.5 |
|
|
|
(15,344.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
111.8 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
15,563.5 |
|
|
$ |
18,744.2 |
|
|
$ |
718.4 |
|
|
$ |
(15,344.1 |
) |
|
$ |
19,682.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
157.6 |
|
|
$ |
307.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
476.8 |
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term
debt |
|
|
388.6 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397.8 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
301.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304.9 |
|
Accrued landfill and environmental costs, current
portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187.9 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
336.9 |
|
|
|
229.7 |
|
|
|
185.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
955.8 |
|
|
|
1,045.1 |
|
|
|
203.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,204.0 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
5,861.3 |
|
|
|
1,032.4 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,907.7 |
|
Accrued landfill and environmental costs, net of current
portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163.6 |
|
|
|
270.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,433.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other long-term tax liabilities |
|
|
984.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
975.7 |
|
Self-insurance reserves, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.2 |
|
|
|
216.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
97.4 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194.5 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Other equity |
|
|
7,660.7 |
|
|
|
15,374.6 |
|
|
|
(30.5 |
) |
|
|
(15,344.1 |
) |
|
|
7,660.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Republic Services, Inc. stockholders
equity |
|
|
7,664.7 |
|
|
|
15,374.6 |
|
|
|
(30.5 |
) |
|
|
(15,344.1 |
) |
|
|
7,664.7 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,664.7 |
|
|
|
15,374.6 |
|
|
|
(28.5 |
) |
|
|
(15,344.1 |
) |
|
|
7,666.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
15,563.5 |
|
|
$ |
18,744.2 |
|
|
$ |
718.4 |
|
|
$ |
(15,344.1 |
) |
|
$ |
19,682.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
71.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
800.6 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207.4 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
111.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
237.7 |
|
|
|
946.5 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,246.1 |
|
Restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172.8 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
6,280.6 |
|
|
|
370.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,698.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,655.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,655.3 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
429.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451.3 |
|
Investment and net advances to affiliate |
|
|
13,513.9 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
149.1 |
|
|
|
(13,703.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,948.6 |
|
|
$ |
18,494.5 |
|
|
$ |
722.7 |
|
|
$ |
(13,703.9 |
) |
|
$ |
19,461.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
89.7 |
|
|
$ |
500.2 |
|
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
606.5 |
|
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term
debt |
|
|
392.2 |
|
|
|
484.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878.5 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
291.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295.1 |
|
Accrued landfill and environmental costs, current
portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182.0 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
222.3 |
|
|
|
200.5 |
|
|
|
198.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
765.6 |
|
|
|
1,690.5 |
|
|
|
220.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,676.5 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
|
|
4,090.8 |
|
|
|
1,760.0 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,865.1 |
|
Accrued landfill and environmental costs, net of current
portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,148.1 |
|
|
|
268.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,416.6 |
|
Deferred income taxes and other long-term tax liabilities |
|
|
1,053.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,044.8 |
|
Self-insurance reserves, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304.5 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
192.4 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305.5 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Other equity |
|
|
7,842.5 |
|
|
|
13,739.6 |
|
|
|
(35.7 |
) |
|
|
(13,703.9 |
) |
|
|
7,842.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Republic Services, Inc. stockholders
equity |
|
|
7,846.5 |
|
|
|
13,739.6 |
|
|
|
(35.7 |
) |
|
|
(13,703.9 |
) |
|
|
7,846.5 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
7,846.5 |
|
|
|
13,739.6 |
|
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
(13,703.9 |
) |
|
|
7,848.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
13,948.6 |
|
|
$ |
18,494.5 |
|
|
$ |
722.7 |
|
|
$ |
(13,703.9 |
) |
|
$ |
19,461.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,030.7 |
|
|
$ |
74.1 |
|
|
$ |
(18.2 |
) |
|
$ |
2,086.6 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1,201.5 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
1,237.8 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
198.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208.6 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
163.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.1 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets
and impairments, net |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
|
|
426.5 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(69.3 |
) |
|
|
(41.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111.4 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(197.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(199.5 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
111.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(114.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany interest income (expense) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
184.2 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
(114.3 |
) |
|
|
91.3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(46.1 |
) |
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
100.8 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
(114.3 |
) |
|
|
46.2 |
|
Net loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Republic Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
46.5 |
|
|
$ |
100.8 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
|
$ |
(114.3 |
) |
|
$ |
46.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,946.1 |
|
|
$ |
138.9 |
|
|
$ |
(33.5 |
) |
|
$ |
4,051.5 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2,325.6 |
|
|
|
101.6 |
|
|
|
(33.5 |
) |
|
|
2,397.5 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
394.2 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414.4 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
72.6 |
|
|
|
320.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404.0 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets
and impairments, net |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(85.2 |
) |
|
|
845.5 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777.4 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(125.7 |
) |
|
|
(101.6 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227.1 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(199.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(201.3 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
449.6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(456.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany interest income (expense) |
|
|
(194.0 |
) |
|
|
188.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
743.6 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
(456.7 |
) |
|
|
351.3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(173.8 |
) |
|
|
308.4 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
204.7 |
|
|
|
435.2 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
(456.7 |
) |
|
|
204.3 |
|
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Republic Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
204.7 |
|
|
$ |
435.2 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
(456.7 |
) |
|
$ |
204.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,009.9 |
|
|
$ |
73.9 |
|
|
$ |
(17.4 |
) |
|
$ |
2,066.4 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1,176.6 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
1,218.3 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
204.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213.8 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
44.7 |
|
|
|
163.4 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets
and impairments, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(51.9 |
) |
|
|
458.6 |
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(55.5 |
) |
|
|
(75.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130.5 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(145.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany interest income (expense) |
|
|
143.1 |
|
|
|
(162.9 |
) |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
173.9 |
|
|
|
222.8 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
(145.6 |
) |
|
|
270.3 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
14.2 |
|
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
159.7 |
|
|
|
133.6 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
(145.6 |
) |
|
|
159.9 |
|
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Republic Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
159.7 |
|
|
$ |
133.4 |
|
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
|
$ |
(145.6 |
) |
|
$ |
159.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,912.2 |
|
|
$ |
144.8 |
|
|
$ |
(32.9 |
) |
|
$ |
4,024.1 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2,279.9 |
|
|
|
104.9 |
|
|
|
(32.9 |
) |
|
|
2,355.1 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
399.5 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416.8 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
97.2 |
|
|
|
318.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421.1 |
|
Loss on disposition of assets and
impairments, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(110.7 |
) |
|
|
897.4 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
782.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(97.9 |
) |
|
|
(167.8 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(265.0 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(132.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132.3 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other (expense) income, net |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
191.7 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(206.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intercompany interest income (expense) |
|
|
266.4 |
|
|
|
(306.2 |
) |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
248.7 |
|
|
|
301.8 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
(206.0 |
) |
|
|
386.5 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
121.4 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
224.7 |
|
|
|
180.4 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
(206.0 |
) |
|
|
225.1 |
|
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to
Republic Services, Inc. |
|
$ |
224.7 |
|
|
$ |
180.0 |
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
(206.0 |
) |
|
$ |
224.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
204.7 |
|
|
$ |
435.2 |
|
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
$ |
(456.7 |
) |
|
$ |
204.3 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of taxes |
|
|
(449.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
456.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
(277.6 |
) |
|
|
878.8 |
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
591.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating
Activities |
|
|
(522.5 |
) |
|
|
1,308.4 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
795.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(481.7 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Cash used in acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
Cash proceeds from divestitures, net of cash divested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Change in restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Change in investment and net advances to affiliate |
|
|
(817.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing
Activities |
|
|
(806.5 |
) |
|
|
(474.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
817.1 |
|
|
|
(472.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
819.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
819.5 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of discount |
|
|
1,844.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,844.9 |
|
Payments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
(894.5 |
) |
|
|
(1,333.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,228.3 |
) |
Premiums paid on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86.8 |
) |
Fees paid to issue and retire senior notes and certain
hedging
relationships |
|
|
(57.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58.6 |
) |
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Purchases of common stock for treasury |
|
|
(262.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262.9 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(152.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152.5 |
) |
Change in investment and net advances from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
817.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(817.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing
Activities |
|
|
1,330.1 |
|
|
|
(603.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(817.1 |
) |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
230.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232.2 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
71.1 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
15.6 |
|
|
$ |
301.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
320.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
REPUBLIC
SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTINUED
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Cash (Used
in) Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
224.7 |
|
|
$ |
180.4 |
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
(206.0 |
) |
|
$ |
225.1 |
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of taxes |
|
|
(191.7 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
206.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments |
|
|
(67.3 |
) |
|
|
357.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Used
in) Provided by Operating
Activities |
|
|
(34.3 |
) |
|
|
524.7 |
|
|
|
104.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
594.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(385.4 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Cash used in acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Change in restricted cash and marketable securities |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
(93.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76.0 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Change in investment and net advances to affiliate |
|
|
(1,315.4 |
) |
|
|
(300.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
1,619.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing
Activities |
|
|
(1,306.0 |
) |
|
|
(657.9 |
) |
|
|
(105.3 |
) |
|
|
1,619.7 |
|
|
|
(449.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
1,020.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020.2 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net of discount |
|
|
1,499.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,499.4 |
|
Payments of notes payable and long-term debt |
|
|
(1,139.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,054.3 |
) |
|
|
(300.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,494.8 |
) |
Premiums paid on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.4 |
) |
Fees paid to issue and retire senior notes and certain
hedging
relationships |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from stock option exercises |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Purchases of common stock for treasury |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(144.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144.9 |
) |
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Change in investment and net advances from parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,319.7 |
|
|
|
300.0 |
|
|
|
(1,619.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing
Activities |
|
|
1,248.9 |
|
|
|
235.0 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(1,619.7 |
) |
|
|
(137.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(91.4 |
) |
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
(62.6 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
At its regular quarterly meeting held in July 2011, our board of directors approved a 10%
increase in our regular quarterly dividend to $0.22 per share. The quarterly dividend of $0.22
per share will be paid on October 17, 2011 to stockholders of record on October 3, 2011.
36
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included under Item 1. In addition, you should refer to our audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and related Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Overview
We are the second largest provider of services in the domestic non-hazardous solid waste industry,
as measured by revenue. We provide non-hazardous solid waste collection services for commercial,
industrial, municipal and residential customers through 343 collection companies in 39 states and
Puerto Rico. We own or operate 197 transfer stations, 193 active solid waste landfills and 72
recycling facilities. We also operate 70 landfill gas and renewable energy projects.
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $4,051.5 million compared to $4,024.1
million for the same period in 2010. Core price for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased
1.0%, fuel surcharges increased 0.9% and commodity revenue increased 1.2%. Offsetting this revenue
growth of 3.1% were decreases of 1.4% due to the expiration of our San Mateo County contract and
our transportation and disposal contract with the City of Toronto effective December 31, 2010, 0.9%
from volume declines and 0.1% related to divestitures.
The following table summarizes our revenue, costs and expenses for the three and six months ended
June 30 (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
2,086.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,066.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,051.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,024.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of operations |
|
|
1,237.8 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
1,218.3 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
|
|
|
2,397.5 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
2,355.1 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and
depletion of property and
equipment |
|
|
189.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
196.2 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
376.8 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
381.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Amortization of other intangible
assets and other assets |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
200.1 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
210.8 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
404.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
421.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Loss on disposition of assets and
impairments, net |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
401.2 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
$ |
400.8 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
$ |
777.4 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
$ |
782.1 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our pre-tax income was $91.3 million and $351.3 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, versus $270.3 million and $386.5 million for the comparable 2010
periods, respectively. Our net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc. was $46.5 million and
$204.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, or $0.12 and $0.54 per diluted
share, respectively, versus $159.7 million and $224.7 million, or $0.42 and $0.59 per diluted share
for the comparable 2010 periods, respectively.
During each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, we recorded a number of charges and
other expenses that impacted our pre-tax income, net income attributable to Republic Services, Inc.
(Net Income Republic) and diluted earnings per share. These items primarily consist of the
following (in millions, except per share data):
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Income - |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Income - |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Republic |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Republic |
|
|
per Share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
91.3 |
|
|
$ |
46.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
270.3 |
|
|
$ |
159.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
199.5 |
|
|
|
120.3 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs to achieve synergies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposition of assets
and impairments, net |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted |
|
$ |
310.2 |
|
|
$ |
184.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
281.3 |
|
|
$ |
166.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Income - |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
|
Income - |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Republic |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Republic |
|
|
per Share |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
351.3 |
|
|
$ |
204.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
386.5 |
|
|
$ |
224.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
|
121.4 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
Costs to achieve synergies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Loss on disposition of assets
and impairments, net |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted |
|
$ |
571.6 |
|
|
$ |
344.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
544.9 |
|
|
$ |
324.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that the presentation of adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted net income attributable
to Republic Services, Inc. and adjusted diluted earnings per share, which are not measures
determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S.
GAAP), provide an understanding of operational activities before the financial impact of certain
non-operational items. We use these measures, and believe investors will find them helpful, in
understanding the ongoing performance of our operations separate from items that have a
disproportionate impact on our results for a particular period. Comparable charges and costs have
been incurred in prior periods, and similar types of adjustments can reasonably be expected to be
recorded in future periods. Our definition of adjusted pre-tax income, adjusted net income
attributable to Republic Services, Inc. and adjusted diluted earnings per share may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we
completed refinancing transactions that resulted in cash paid for premiums and professional fees to
repurchase outstanding debt as well as the non-cash write-off of unamortized debt discounts and
deferred issuance costs. For more detailed discussion of the components of these costs and the
debt series to which they relate, see our Loss on Extinguishment of Debt discussion contained in
the Results of Operations section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Costs to achieve synergies. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred $8.5
million and $17.5 million, respectively, of incremental costs to achieve our synergy plan that are
recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. These incremental costs primarily related
to a synergy incentive plan as well as other integration costs. We expect to pay amounts earned
under the synergy incentive plan during the first quarter of 2012.
Restructuring charges. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred $1.4
million and $7.0 million, respectively, of restructuring and integration charges related to our
merger with Allied. These charges consisted of severance and other employee termination and
relocation benefits as well as consulting and professional fees. Substantially all of these charges
were recorded in our corporate segment. As of June 30, 2011, $0.6 million remains accrued for
severance and other employee termination benefits. We expect that the majority of these charges
will be paid during 2011.
Loss on Disposition of Assets and Impairments, Net. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, we recorded a loss on disposition of assets and impairments, net of $19.4 million and $19.0
million, respectively. For more detailed discussion of the components of these costs, see our
Loss on Disposition of Assets and Impairments, Net discussion contained in the Results of
Operations section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
38
Recent Developments
At its regular quarterly meeting held in July 2011, our board of directors approved a 10% percent
increase in our regular quarterly dividend to $0.22 per share. The quarterly dividend of $0.22
per share will be paid on October 17, 2011 to stockholders of record on October 3, 2011.
Results of Operations
Revenue
We generate revenue primarily from our solid waste collection operations. Our remaining revenue is
from other services, including transfer stations, landfill disposal and recycling. Our revenue from
collection operations consists of fees we receive from commercial, industrial, municipal and
residential customers. Our residential and commercial collection operations in some markets are
based on long-term contracts with municipalities. Certain of our municipal contracts have annual
price escalation clauses that are tied to changes in an underlying base index such as the consumer
price index. We generally provide commercial and industrial collection services to customers under
contracts with terms up to three years. Our transfer stations, landfills and, to a lesser extent,
our material recovery facilities generate revenue from disposal or tipping fees charged to third
parties. In general, we integrate our recycling operations with our collection operations and
obtain revenue from the sale of recyclable materials. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue
from sales of recyclable materials and revenue from National Accounts. National Accounts revenue
included in other revenue represents the portion of revenue generated from nationwide contracts in
markets outside our operating areas, and, as such, the associated waste handling services are
subcontracted to local operators. Consequently, substantially all of this revenue is offset with
related subcontract costs, which are recorded in cost of operations.
The following table reflects our revenue by service line for the three and six months ended June 30
(in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Collection: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
537.6 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
$ |
546.2 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,063.3 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
$ |
1,080.9 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
627.6 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
622.7 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
1,245.6 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
1,244.2 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
390.6 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
383.2 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
744.2 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
731.3 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total collection |
|
|
1,563.8 |
|
|
|
74.9 |
|
|
|
1,559.1 |
|
|
|
75.5 |
|
|
|
3,069.0 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
3,070.2 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer and disposal |
|
|
766.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
791.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,440.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,483.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Intercompany |
|
|
(387.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(732.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(757.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer and disposal, net |
|
|
379.3 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
391.1 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
708.6 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
726.0 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
Sale of recycling materials |
|
|
107.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
77.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
205.6 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
148.8 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Other non-core |
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
79.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
143.5 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
116.2 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
273.9 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
227.9 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
2,086.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
2,066.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,051.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,024.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 50% of our annual revenue is restricted as to the amount of certain pricing
changes. Such restrictions on price increases include but are not limited to the following:
|
|
Price changes based upon fluctuation in a specific index as defined in the contract; |
|
|
Fixed price increases based on stated contract terms; or |
|
|
Price changes based on cost plus a specific profit margin or other measurement. |
Of these restricted pricing arrangements, approximately 70% are based on a consumer price index,
20% are fixed arrangements and the remainder are based upon a cost plus or other specific
arrangement. The consumer price index varies from either a single historical stated period of time
or an average of trailing historical rates over a stated period of time. In addition, many pricing
resets lag between
39
the measurement period and the date the revised pricing goes into effect. As a
result, current changes in a specific index, such as the consumer price index, may not manifest
themselves in our reported pricing for several quarters into the future.
The following table reflects changes in our core revenue for the three and six months ended June
30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Core price |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
Fuel surcharges |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Recycling Commodities |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total price |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Mateo and Toronto contract
losses |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total internal growth |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions / divestitures, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, our total price increased 3.4% and 3.1%
primarily due to core price increases, fuel surcharges price increases, and commodity price
increases. Our San Mateo County contract and our transportation and disposal contract with the City
of Toronto expired effective December 31, 2010, which reduced our internal revenue growth by 1.4%.
Our collection and transfer station lines of business continue to experience declines in volume due
to the challenging economic environment; however, our landfill line of business experienced
positive volume growth primarily due to special waste volumes.
Cost of Operations
Cost of operations includes labor and related benefits, which consists of salaries and wages,
health and welfare benefits, incentive compensation and payroll taxes. It also includes transfer
and disposal costs representing tipping fees paid to third party disposal facilities and transfer
stations; maintenance and repairs relating to our vehicles, equipment and containers, including
related labor and benefit costs; transportation and subcontractor costs, which include costs for
independent haulers who transport our waste to disposal facilities and costs for local operators
who provide waste handling services associated with our National Accounts in markets outside our
standard operating areas; fuel, which includes the direct cost of fuel used by our vehicles, net of
fuel credits; disposal franchise fees and taxes consisting of landfill taxes, municipal franchise
fees, host community fees and royalties; landfill operating costs, which includes landfill
accretion, financial assurance, leachate disposal and other landfill maintenance costs; risk
management, which includes casualty insurance premiums and claims; cost of goods sold, which
includes material costs paid to suppliers associated with recycling commodities; and other, which
includes expenses such as facility operating costs, equipment rent and gains or losses on sale of
assets used in our operations.
The following table summarizes the major components of our cost of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30 (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue):
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Labor and related benefits |
|
$ |
383.5 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
$ |
383.7 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
$ |
760.7 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
$ |
759.4 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
Transfer and disposal costs |
|
|
167.6 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
174.1 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
316.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
329.6 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Maintenance and repairs |
|
|
158.1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
155.0 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
305.5 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
301.4 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Transportation and subcontract costs |
|
|
113.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
212.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
235.8 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
Fuel |
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
255.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
198.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Franchise fees and taxes |
|
|
100.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
101.4 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
192.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
195.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Landfill operating costs |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
58.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
64.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Risk management |
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
72.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
134.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
136.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of operations |
|
$ |
1,237.8 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,218.3 |
|
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
$ |
2,397.5 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
% |
|
$ |
2,355.1 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost categories shown above may change from time to time and may not be comparable to similarly
titled categories used by other companies. As such, you should take care when comparing our cost of
operations by cost component to that of other companies.
Our cost of operations as a percentage of revenue increased 0.4% and 0.7% for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, versus the comparable 2010 periods, primarily as a result
of the following:
|
|
|
Average fuel costs per gallon for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were $4.01
and $3.81, respectively, versus $3.03 and $2.94 for the comparable 2010 periods, an increase
of $0.98 and $0.87 or 32.3% and 29.6%, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold increased primarily as a result of changes in the market prices of
commodities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 versus the comparable 2010
period. Average prices for old corrugated cardboard (OCC) for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 were $162.61 per ton and $162.24 per ton, respectively, versus
$134.64 per ton and $139.70 per ton for the comparable 2010 periods, an increase of $27.97 per
ton and $22.54 per ton or 20.8% and 16.1%, respectively. Average prices of old newspaper (ONP)
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 were $152.09 per ton and $149.55 per ton,
respectively versus $111.08 per ton and $107.14 per ton for the comparable 2010 periods, an
increase of $41.01 per ton and $42.41 per ton or 36.9% and 39.6%, respectively. |
The increases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
Transfer and disposal costs decreased during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 versus the comparable 2010 periods
primarily due to the divestiture of a New York transfer station in 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Transportation and subcontract costs decreased during the three and six months ended June
30, 2011 versus the comparable 2010 periods primarily due to the expiration of our San Mateo
County contract and our transportation and disposal contract with the City of Toronto. |
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, approximately 66%, respectively, of the total
waste volume that we collected was disposed at landfill sites that we own or operate
(internalization), versus 67% and 68% for the comparable 2010 periods.
Depreciation, Amortization and Depletion of Property and Equipment
The following table summarizes depreciation, amortization and depletion of property and equipment
for the three and six months ended June 30 (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue):
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of
property and equipment |
|
$ |
128.5 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
$ |
126.9 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
$ |
256.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
$ |
255.9 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Landfill depletion and amortization |
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
120.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
125.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and
depletion expense |
|
$ |
189.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
$ |
196.2 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
$ |
376.8 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
$ |
381.6 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and depletion expenses for property and equipment were $189.7 million
and $376.8 million or, as a percentage of revenue, 9.1% and 9.3% for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, respectively, versus $196.2 million and $381.6 million or, as a percentage of
revenue, 9.5% for the comparable 2010 periods. The decrease in landfill depletion and amortization
as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011 versus the comparable 2010
period is due primarily to a favorable adjustment to landfill depletion and amortization expense
for asset retirement obligations of $7.4 million.
Amortization of Other Intangible and Other Assets
Expenses for amortization of intangible and other assets were $18.9 million and $37.6 million or,
as a percentage of revenue, 0.9% and 0.8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, versus $17.6 million and $35.2 million or, as a percentage of revenue, 0.8% and 0.9%
for the comparable 2010 periods. Our other intangible assets primarily relate to customer lists,
franchise agreements, municipal contracts and agreements, tradenames and, to a lesser extent,
non-compete agreements.
Accretion Expenses
Accretion expenses were $19.5 million and $39.2 million or, as a percentage of revenue, 1.0% for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, versus $20.2 million and $40.4 million
or, as a percentage of revenue, 1.0% for the comparable 2010 periods. The amounts have remained
relatively unchanged as our asset retirement obligations remained relatively consistent period over
period.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, health and welfare benefits and
incentive compensation for corporate and field general management, field support functions, sales
force, accounting and finance, legal, management information systems and clerical and
administrative departments. Other expenses include rent and office costs, fees for professional
services provided by third parties, marketing, investor and community relations services,
directors and officers insurance, general employee relocation, travel, entertainment and bank
charges, but exclude any such amounts recorded as restructuring charges.
The following table summarizes our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and
six months ended June 30 (in millions of dollars and as a percentage of revenue):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
130.1 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
$ |
134.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
265.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
$ |
268.2 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Costs to achieve synergies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
125.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
$ |
200.1 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
$ |
210.8 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
$ |
404.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
421.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost categories shown above may change from time to time and may not be comparable to similarly
titled categories used by other companies. As such, you should take care when comparing our
selling, general and administrative expenses by cost component to those of other companies.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred $8.5 million and $17.5 million,
respectively, of incremental costs to achieve our synergy plan that are recorded in selling,
general and administrative expenses. These incremental costs primarily relate to
42
a synergy
incentive plan as well as other integration costs. All costs related to the synergy plan have been
accrued as of December 31, 2010. We expect to pay amounts earned under the synergy incentive plan
during the first quarter of 2012.
Loss on Disposition of Assets and Impairments, Net
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 we recorded a loss on disposition of assets and
impairments, net of $19.4 million and $19.0 million, respectively. The components of the loss on
disposition of assets and impairments, net during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Gain on the disposition of businesses |
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.1 |
) |
Southern Region landfill asset impairment |
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
Western Region asset impairment |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
All other, net |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposition of assets and impairments, net |
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We disposed of businesses in three markets in our Southern Region during the three months ended
June 30, 2011, resulting in a gain of $17.1 million. In connection with the disposition of these
businesses, we closed a landfill site resulting in an asset impairment charge of $28.5 million for
the remaining landfill assets and the acceleration of capping, closure and post-closure costs.
Separately, we recorded asset impairments of $7.2 million for expected losses on the divestiture of
certain businesses and goodwill in our Western Region.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a net loss of $1.1 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, for certain legal expenses and other costs for various divestiture
transaction activities.
Restructuring Charges
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred $1.4 million and $7.0 million,
respectively, of restructuring and integration charges related to our merger with Allied. These
charges consisted of severance and other employee termination and relocation benefits as well as
consulting and professional fees. Substantially all of these charges were recorded in our corporate
segment. As of June 30, 2011, $0.6 million remains accrued for severance and other employee
termination benefits. We expect that the majority of these charges will be paid during 2011. We did
not incur any such charges during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
Interest Expense
The following table provides the components of interest expense, including accretion of debt
discounts and accretion primarily associated with environmental and self-funded risk insurance
liabilities assumed in the acquisition of Allied for the three and six months ended June 30 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest expense on debt and capital
lease obligations |
|
$ |
94.8 |
|
|
$ |
107.4 |
|
|
$ |
189.6 |
|
|
$ |
214.4 |
|
Accretion of debt discounts |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
Accretion of remediation and risk reserves |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Less: capitalized interest |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
111.4 |
|
|
$ |
130.5 |
|
|
$ |
227.1 |
|
|
$ |
265.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest expense and accretion of debt discounts during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 versus the comparable 2010 periods is primarily due to refinancing certain of
our higher interest rate debt in 2010. Cash paid for interest was $200.9 million and $209.1 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
43
The debt we assumed from Allied was recorded at fair value as of December 5, 2008. We recorded a
discount of $624.3 million that is amortized as interest expense over the applicable terms of the
related debt instruments or written-off upon refinancing. The remaining unamortized discounts as of
June 30, 2011 on the outstanding debt assumed from Allied are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Over the Next |
|
|
|
Discount |
|
|
Twelve Months |
|
$750.0 million 6.875% senior notes due June 2017 |
|
$ |
80.9 |
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
$99.5 million 9.250% debentures due May 2021 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
$360.0 million 7.400% debentures due September 2035 |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Other, maturing 2014 through 2018 |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
148.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we completed the following financing
transactions resulting in cash paid for premiums and professional fees to repurchase debt as well
as the non-cash write-off of unamortized debt discounts and deferred issuance costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid |
|
|
Non-cash |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Loss on |
|
|
Loss on |
|
|
Loss on |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
Repaid |
|
|
of Debt |
|
|
of Debt |
|
|
of Debt |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$99.5 million 9.250% debentures due May 2021 |
|
First |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Credit Facilities |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
$600.0 million 7.125% senior notes due May 2016 |
|
Second |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
$99.5 million 9.250% debentures due May 2021 |
|
Second |
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
$360.0 million 7.400% debentures due September 2035 |
|
Second |
|
|
182.7 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
Ineffective portion of interest rate lock settlements |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable securitization program |
|
First |
|
$ |
300.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$425.0 million 6.125% senior notes due February 2014 |
|
First |
|
|
425.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
$600.0 million 7.250% senior notes due March 2015 |
|
First |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
101.8 |
|
|
$ |
132.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See also our Financial Condition section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes was $45.1 million and $147.0 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, respectively, versus $110.4 million and $161.4 million for the comparable 2010
periods. Our effective income tax rate was 49.3% and 41.8% for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, respectively, versus 40.9% and 41.8% for the comparable
2010 periods. The effective tax rate for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 was higher than expected due to the write-off of
book goodwill with no corresponding tax basis and the impact of lower
pre-tax book earnings as a result of the loss on extinguishment of
debt.
In the future we may choose to divest of certain operating assets that have little or no tax basis,
thereby resulting in a higher taxable gain than otherwise would be recognized. The higher taxable
gain will increase our effective rate in the quarter in which the divestiture is consummated.
44
Reportable Segments
Our operations are managed and reviewed through four geographic regions that we designate as our
reportable segments. Summarized financial information concerning our reportable segments for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is shown in the following table (in millions of
dollars and as a percentage of revenue):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, |
|
|
Disposition of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization, |
|
|
Assets, Net |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Depletion and |
|
|
and Asset |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Margin |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
537.1 |
|
|
$ |
47.6 |
|
|
$ |
(2.7 |
) |
|
$ |
136.7 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
Midwestern |
|
|
466.8 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Southern |
|
|
514.2 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
110.3 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
Western |
|
|
543.9 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
117.9 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(60.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,086.6 |
|
|
$ |
228.1 |
|
|
$ |
(19.4 |
) |
|
$ |
401.2 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
532.2 |
|
|
$ |
52.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
122.6 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Midwestern |
|
|
457.7 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Southern |
|
|
503.1 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
119.7 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Western |
|
|
546.3 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
131.3 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,066.4 |
|
|
$ |
234.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
$ |
400.8 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, |
|
|
Disposition of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization, |
|
|
Assets, Net |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Depletion and |
|
|
and Asset |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Accretion |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Margin |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
1,038.4 |
|
|
$ |
99.0 |
|
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
$ |
254.4 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
Midwestern |
|
|
885.7 |
|
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
176.8 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Southern |
|
|
1,008.8 |
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
229.9 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
Western |
|
|
1,072.7 |
|
|
|
111.0 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
240.9 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(124.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,051.5 |
|
|
$ |
453.6 |
|
|
$ |
(19.0 |
) |
|
$ |
777.4 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern |
|
$ |
1,034.3 |
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
250.8 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
% |
Midwestern |
|
|
872.6 |
|
|
|
106.6 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
189.5 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
Southern |
|
|
992.7 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
240.3 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Western |
|
|
1,072.1 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
261.9 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
Corporate entities |
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,024.1 |
|
|
$ |
457.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
$ |
782.1 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate entities include legal, tax, treasury, information technology, risk management, human
resources, corporate accounts and other typical administrative functions. National Accounts revenue
included in corporate entities represents the portion of revenue generated from nationwide
contracts in markets outside our operating areas, and, as such, the associated waste handling
services are subcontracted to local operators. Consequently, substantially all of this revenue is
offset with related subcontract costs, which are recorded in cost of operations.
45
Significant changes in the revenue and operating margins of our reportable segments comparing the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 with 2010 are discussed in the following paragraphs. The
results of our reportable segments affected by the disposition of certain assets and liabilities in
the normal course of business are noted below where significant.
Eastern Region
Revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 benefited from core price growth in all
lines of business except residential collection. We experienced volume increases in our residential
collection and landfill lines of business.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, operating margins were 25.5% and 24.5%,
respectively, versus 23.0% and 24.2% for the comparable 2010 periods. The increase in operating
margins is due primarily to a favorable adjustment to landfill depletion and amortization expense
for asset retirement obligations of $6.9 million and renegotiation and settlement of certain
landfill operating maintenance agreements of $5.2 million. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, margins were favorably impacted by lower disposal, subcontract and transportation
costs as a result of a decline in subcontracted volumes. These favorable items were partially
offset by higher fuel and risk management costs.
Midwestern Region
Revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 benefited from core price growth in all
lines of business and an increase in recycling commodity revenue. These increases were offset by
volume declines in all lines of business, except for commercial and industrial collection, in part
due to the expiration of the City of Toronto transportation and disposal contract.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, operating margins were 20.7% and 20.0%,
respectively, versus 22.0% and 21.7% for the comparable 2010 periods. The decrease in operating
margins is due primarily to higher fuel costs and legal settlements, partially offset by lower
disposal, subcontract and transportation costs as a result of a decline in subcontracted volumes.
Southern Region
Revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 benefited from core price growth in all
collection lines of business, except residential, and an increase in landfill core price growth.
These increases were partially offset by volume declines in our commercial and residential
collection lines of business.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, operating margins were 21.5% and 22.8%,
respectively, versus 23.8% and 24.2% for the comparable 2010 periods. The decrease in operating
margins is due primarily to the early closure of a landfill site resulting in an impairment charge
of $28.5 million for the write-off of the remaining landfill assets and the acceleration of
capping, closure and post-closure costs partially offset by a gain of $17.1 million relating to the
disposition of businesses in three markets. Additionally, margins were affected by higher fuel
costs, partially offset by lower disposal costs, during both the three and six months ended June
30, 2011 versus the same comparable 2010 periods.
Western Region
Revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 benefited from core price growth in all
lines of business and an increase in recycling commodity revenues. Offsetting these increases were
volume declines in all lines of business, primarily due to the expiration of our San Mateo County
contract.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, operating margins were 21.7% and 22.5%,
respectively, versus 24.0% and 24.4% for the comparable 2010 periods. The decrease in operating
margins is due primarily to a $7.2 million charge related to expected losses from the divestiture
of a business and the write-off of goodwill associated with that business. Higher fuel costs
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and the impact of a $5.7 million first quarter
2010 favorable adjustment to landfill depletion and amortization expense for asset retirement
obligations were partially offset by lower labor, benefit and disposal costs due to the expiration
of our San Mateo County contract.
Corporate Entities
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, operating loss improved $13.4 million and $35.8
million, respectively, versus the comparable 2010 periods. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, we incurred $8.5 million and $17.5 million,
46
respectively, of incremental costs to achieve our synergy plan and $1.4 million and $7.0
million, respectively, of restructuring and integration charges related to our merger with Allied
that are recorded in our corporate segment, as well as accruals for litigation costs. We did not
incur these expenses during the comparable 2011 periods.
Landfill and Environmental Matters
Available Airspace
The following table reflects landfill airspace activity for active landfills owned or operated by
us for the six months ended June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Landfills |
|
|
Permits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Acquired, |
|
|
Granted, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Airspace |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
Closures |
|
|
Consumed |
|
|
2011 |
|
Cubic yards (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permitted airspace |
|
|
4,595.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
4,612.4 |
|
Probable expansion airspace |
|
|
149.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cubic yards (in millions) |
|
|
4,744.6 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
(38.9 |
) |
|
|
4,753.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of sites: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permitted airspace |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probable expansion airspace |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in engineering estimates typically include modifications to the available disposal capacity
of a landfill based on a refinement of the capacity calculations resulting from updated
information. Changes in design typically include significant modifications to a landfills
footprint or vertical slopes.
As of June 30, 2011, we owned or operated 193 active solid waste landfills with total available
disposal capacity estimated to be 4.8 billion in-place cubic yards. Total available disposal
capacity represents the sum of estimated permitted airspace plus an estimate of probable expansion
airspace. These estimates are developed at least annually by engineers utilizing information
provided by annual aerial surveys. As of June 30, 2011, total available disposal capacity is
estimated to be 4.6 billion in-place cubic yards of permitted airspace plus 0.2 billion in-place
cubic yards of probable expansion airspace. Before airspace included in an expansion area is deemed
to be probable expansion airspace and, therefore, included in our calculation of total available
disposal capacity, it must meet all of our expansion criteria. During the six months ended June 30,
2011, total available airspace increased by 47.3 million cubic yards, net, primarily due to
recovery of past permitted airspace at our Countywide landfill of approximately 20 million cubic
yards coupled with new expansions, net of closure and acquisitions, net of divestiture, offset by
38.9 million cubic yards of airspace consumed.
As of June 30, 2011, seven of our landfills met all of our criteria for including their probable
expansion airspace in our total available disposal capacity. At projected annual volumes, these
landfills have an estimated remaining average site life of 48 years, including probable expansion
airspace. The average estimated remaining life of all of our landfills is 54 years. We have other
expansion opportunities that are not included in our total available airspace because they do not
meet all of our criteria to be deemed probable expansion airspace.
Final Capping, Closure and Post-Closure Costs
As of June 30, 2011, accrued final capping, closure and post-closure costs were 1,066.3 million, of
which $96.7 million is current and $969.6 million is long-term as reflected in our unaudited
consolidated balance sheet in accrued landfill and environmental costs.
Environmental Remediation Liabilities
The following is a discussion of certain of our significant remediation matters:
47
Countywide Landfill. In September 2009, Republic Services of Ohio II, LLC entered into Final
Findings and Orders with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency that require us to implement a
comprehensive operation and maintenance program to manage the remediation area at the Countywide
Recycling and Disposal Facility (Countywide). The remediation liability for Countywide recorded as
of June 30, 2011 is $63.9 million, of which $4.6 million is expected to be paid during the next
twelve months. We believe the reasonably possible range of loss for remediation costs is $55
million to $76 million.
West Contra Costa County Landfill. In 2006, we were issued an Enforcement Order by the California
Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) for the Class 1 Hazardous waste cell at the West
Contra Costa County Landfill (West County). Subsequently, we entered into a Consent Agreement with
DTSC in 2007 in which we agreed to undertake certain remedial actions. The remediation liability
for West County recorded as of June 30, 2011 is $45.7 million, of which $2.4 million is expected to
be paid during the next twelve months. We believe the reasonably possible range of loss for
remediation costs is $36 million to $62 million.
Sunrise Landfill. In August 2008, Republic Services of Southern Nevada (RSSN), signed a Consent
Decree with the EPA, the Bureau of Land Management and Clark County, Nevada related to the Sunrise
Landfill. Under the Consent Decree, RSSN has agreed to perform certain remedial actions at the
Sunrise Landfill for which RSSN and Clark County were otherwise jointly and severally liable. The
remediation liability for Sunrise recorded as of June 30, 2011 is $36.8 million, of which $24.0
million is expected to be paid during the next twelve months. We believe the reasonably possible
range of loss for remediation costs is $28 million to $43 million.
Congress Landfill. In August 2010, Congress Development Company agreed with the State of Illinois
to have a Final Consent Order (Final Order) entered by the Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County.
Pursuant to the Final Order, we have agreed to continue to implement certain remedial activities at
the Congress Landfill. The remediation liability recorded as of June 30, 2011 is $83.7 million, of
which $8.0 million is expected to be paid during the next twelve months. We believe the reasonably
possible range of loss for remediation costs is $44 million to $144 million.
It is reasonably possible that we will need to adjust the liabilities noted above to reflect the
effects of new or additional information, to the extent that such information impacts the costs,
timing or duration of the required actions. Future changes in our estimates of the costs, timing or
duration of the required actions could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Investment in Landfills
The following tables reflect changes in our investment in landfills for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and the future expected investment as of June 30, 2011 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash |
|
|
Impairments, |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
for |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
for Asset |
|
|
and |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
2011 |
|
Non-depletable landfill land |
|
$ |
158.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
157.2 |
|
Landfill development costs |
|
|
4,575.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
4,623.5 |
|
Construction-in-progress landfill |
|
|
133.2 |
|
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.3 |
|
Accumulated depletion and
amortization |
|
|
(1,504.6 |
) |
|
|
(108.7 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
(1,606.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in landfill land and
development costs |
|
$ |
3,361.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
(39.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.3 |
) |
|
$ |
3,338.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Expected |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Future |
|
|
Expected |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Investment |
|
Non-depletable landfill land |
|
$ |
157.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
157.2 |
|
Landfill development costs |
|
|
4,623.5 |
|
|
|
6,325.6 |
|
|
|
10,949.1 |
|
Construction-in-progress landfill |
|
|
164.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164.3 |
|
Accumulated depletion and amortization |
|
|
(1,606.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,606.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in landfill land and development costs |
|
$ |
3,338.9 |
|
|
$ |
6,325.6 |
|
|
$ |
9,664.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
The following table reflects our net investment in our landfills, excluding non-depletable land,
and our depletion, amortization and accretion expense for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Number of landfills owned or operated |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment, excluding non-depletable land (in millions) |
|
$ |
3,181.7 |
|
|
$ |
3,157.8 |
|
Total estimated available disposal capacity (in millions of cubic yards) |
|
|
4,753.0 |
|
|
|
4,640.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment per cubic yard |
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landfill depletion and amortization expense (in millions) |
|
$ |
120.8 |
|
|
$ |
125.7 |
|
Accretion expense (in millions) |
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
160.0 |
|
|
$ |
166.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Airspace consumed (in millions of cubic yards) |
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion, amortization and accretion expense per cubic yard of airspace consumed |
|
$ |
4.11 |
|
|
$ |
3.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the investment in our landfills, in aggregate dollars, is primarily due to new
expansions and acquisitions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our weighted-average compaction rate was approximately
1,800 pounds per cubic yard based on our three-year historical moving average as compared to 1,700
pounds per cubic yard for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our compaction rates may improve as a
result of the settlement and decomposition of waste.
As of June 30, 2011, we expect to spend an estimated additional $6.3 billion on existing landfills,
primarily related to cell construction and environmental structures, over their expected remaining
lives. Our total expected investment, excluding non-depletable land, estimated to be $9.5 billion
or $2.00 per cubic yard, is used in determining our depletion and amortization expense based on
airspace consumed using the units-of-consumption method.
Selected Balance Sheet Accounts
The following tables reflect the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts, final capping,
closure, post-closure and remediation liabilities, and accrued self-insurance during the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Final Capping, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful |
|
|
Closure and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self- |
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
Post-Closure |
|
|
Remediation |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
50.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,046.5 |
|
|
$ |
552.1 |
|
|
$ |
417.2 |
|
Non-cash additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
190.8 |
|
Payments or usage |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(35.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(190.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
|
|
47.1 |
|
|
|
1,066.3 |
|
|
|
555.4 |
|
|
|
420.6 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(47.1 |
) |
|
|
(96.7 |
) |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(121.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
969.6 |
|
|
$ |
464.2 |
|
|
$ |
299.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Final Capping, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doubtful |
|
|
Closure and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self- |
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
Post-Closure |
|
|
Remediation |
|
|
Insurance |
|
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,074.5 |
|
|
$ |
554.1 |
|
|
$ |
412.9 |
|
Non-cash additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and other adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions charged to expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Transfers to assets held for sale |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
177.5 |
|
Payments or usage |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(28.0 |
) |
|
|
(23.4 |
) |
|
|
(173.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
1,094.2 |
|
|
|
549.3 |
|
|
|
421.1 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
|
(52.5 |
) |
|
|
(123.7 |
) |
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
|
|
(119.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
970.5 |
|
|
$ |
447.1 |
|
|
$ |
301.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, accounts receivable were $872.3 million, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $47.1 million, resulting in days sales outstanding of 38, or 25 days net of deferred
revenue. In addition, at June 30, 2011, our accounts receivable in excess of 90 days old totaled
$47.4 million, or 5.15% of gross receivables outstanding.
Property and Equipment
The following tables reflect the activity in our property and equipment accounts for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Property and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
Impairments, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
for |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, |
|
|
for Asset |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
and |
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
Other |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
2011 |
|
Other land |
|
$ |
391.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
|
$ |
387.4 |
|
Non-depletable landfill land |
|
|
158.0 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
157.2 |
|
Landfill development costs |
|
|
4,575.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
4,623.5 |
|
Vehicles and equipment |
|
|
4,142.1 |
|
|
|
262.3 |
|
|
|
(69.7 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
4,337.6 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
768.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
779.1 |
|
Construction-in-progress landfill |
|
|
133.2 |
|
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74.9 |
) |
|
|
164.3 |
|
Construction-in-progress other |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,196.1 |
|
|
$ |
387.6 |
|
|
$ |
(73.1 |
) |
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
(15.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(45.5 |
) |
|
$ |
10,478.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation, Amortization and Depletion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of |
|
|
Retirement |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Retirements |
|
|
Divestitures |
|
|
Obligations |
|
|
2011 |
|
Landfill development costs |
|
$ |
(1,504.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(108.7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1,606.1 |
) |
Vehicles and equipment |
|
|
(1,820.6 |
) |
|
|
(240.4 |
) |
|
|
62.4 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,981.4 |
) |
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
(172.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3,497.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(366.3 |
) |
|
$ |
63.4 |
|
|
$ |
17.9 |
|
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
(3,775.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The major components of changes in cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are
discussed in the following paragraphs. The following table summarizes our cash flow from operating
activities, investing activities and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010 (in millions):
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
795.6 |
|
|
$ |
594.8 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(472.2 |
) |
|
|
(449.5 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(91.2 |
) |
|
|
(137.3 |
) |
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
The most significant items affecting the comparison of our operating cash flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below:
Earnings decrease. Our net income decreased by $20.8 million during the six months ended June 30,
2011 versus the comparable 2010 period. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we incurred a
loss of $201.3 million for premiums paid to repurchase debt, charges for unamortized debt discounts
and professional fees paid to effectuate the repurchase of the senior notes versus $132.3 million
incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from business acquisitions and divestitures.
Changes in assets and liabilities decreased our cash flow from operations by $66.5 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2011 versus a decrease of $229.6 million in the comparable 2010 period,
primarily as a result of the following:
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we received a net income tax refund of $49.8
million primarily due to the December 2010 tax law change for bonus depreciation. During the
six months ended June 30, 2010 we paid $110.6 million related to the settlement of certain
tax liabilities regarding BFI risk management companies. |
|
|
|
|
Total cash paid for taxes, net of refunds received was $107.4 million and $284.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for restructuring and synergy related charges was $10.3 million lower during
the six months ended June 30, 2011 than the comparable 2010 period. |
We use cash flows from operations to fund capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividend payments,
share repurchases and debt repayments.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
The most significant items affecting the comparison of our cash flows used in investing activities
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below:
Capital expenditures. Capital expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $481.7
million, compared with $385.4 million in the comparable 2010 period. During 2011, we expect our
capital expenditures to approximate $870 million. However, we expect property and equipment
received during 2011 to be approximately $750 million, which excludes $120 million of property and
equipment received during 2010 but paid for during 2011.
Cash used in acquisitions. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we acquired various solid
waste businesses for which we paid $28.0 million. We had no significant acquisitions during the six
month period ended June 30, 2010.
Cash proceeds from divestitures. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we divested of certain
assets in our Southern, Western and Eastern Regions for which we received $10.4 million. We had no
significant divestitures during the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
Change in restricted cash and marketable securities. Changes in our restricted cash and marketable
securities balances, which are related to the issuance of tax-exempt bonds for our capital needs,
collateral for certain of our obligations and amounts held in trust as a guarantee of performance,
provided $12.7 million to our investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Changes in our restricted cash and marketable securities balances for the six months ended June 30,
2010 decreased our cash used in investing activities by $76.0 million due to funding of premiums
used to settle claims related to our self-insurance programs. Funds received from issuances of
tax-exempt bonds are deposited directly into trust accounts by the bonding authority at the time of
issuance. As we do not have the ability to use these funds for general operating purposes, they are
classified as restricted cash in our consolidated
51
balance sheets. Proceeds from bond issuances into restricted trust accounts represent cash used in
investing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows. Reimbursements from the trust
for qualifying expenditures are presented as cash provided by investing activities in our
consolidated statements of cash flows.
We intend to finance capital expenditures and acquisitions through cash on hand, restricted cash
held for capital expenditures, cash flows from operations, our Credit Facilities, and tax-exempt
bonds and other financings. We expect to use primarily cash for future business acquisitions.
Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities
The most significant items affecting the comparison of our cash flows used in financing activities
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below:
Net debt repayments or borrowings. Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt and issuance of
senior notes net of payments of notes payable and long-term debt were $436.1 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2011 versus net proceeds of $24.8 million in the comparable 2010 period. See
also our Financial Condition section of this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
Premiums and fees paid to issue and retire senior notes. Cash premiums and fees paid in connection
with the issuance of our senior notes and tax-exempt financings as well as purchasing and retiring
certain indebtedness were $145.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 versus $51.2
million in the comparable 2010 period.
Purchases of common stock for treasury. In November 2010, our board of directors approved a share
repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to $400.0 million of our outstanding
shares of common stock. From November 2010 to June 30, 2011, we repurchased 10.1 million shares of
our stock for $303.2 million at a weighted average cost per share of $30.08. During the six months
ended June 30, 2011, we repurchased 8.6 million shares for $262.1 million at a weighted average
cost per share of $30.35.
Cash dividends paid. We initiated a quarterly cash dividend in July 2003. The dividend has been
increased from time to time thereafter. In July 2010, the board of directors approved an increase
in the quarterly dividend to $0.20 per share. Dividends paid were $152.5 million and $144.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Financial Condition
As of June 30, 2011, we had $320.5 million of cash and cash equivalents, and $160.1 million of
restricted cash deposits and restricted marketable securities, including $29.2 million of
restricted cash held for capital expenditures under certain debt facilities.
Credit Facilities
In April 2011, we amended and restated our $1.0 billion revolving credit facility due April 2012
(the Amended and Restated Credit Facility) to increase the borrowing capacity to $1.25 billion and
to extend the maturity to April 2016. The Amended and Restated Credit Facility includes a feature
that will allow us to increase availability, at our option, by an aggregate amount up to $500
million, through increased commitments from existing lenders or the addition of new lenders. At our
option, borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility bear interest at a Base Rate, or
a Eurodollar Rate, plus an applicable margin based on our Debt Ratings (all as defined in the
agreements).
Contemporaneous with the execution of the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, we entered into
Amendment No. 2, to our existing $1.75 billion credit facility (the Existing Credit Facility and,
together with the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, the Credit Facilities), to reduce the
commitments under the Existing Credit Facility to $1.25 billion and conform certain terms of the
Existing Credit Facility with those of the Amended and Restated Credit Facility. Amendment No. 2
does not extend the maturity date under the Existing Credit Facility, which matures in September
2013. Substantially all of our subsidiaries continue to guarantee all obligations under the
Existing Credit Facility.
As of December 31, 2010, the interest rate for our borrowings under our Credit Facilities was
1.56%. Our Credit Facilities also are subject to facility fees based on applicable rates defined in
the agreements and the aggregate commitments, regardless of usage. Availability under our Credit
Facilities can be used for working capital, capital expenditures, letters of credit and other
general corporate purposes. We had no borrowings under our Credit Facilities at June 30, 2011. We
had $75.0 million of Eurodollar Rate
52
borrowings as of December 31, 2010. We had $923.4 million and $1,037.5 million of letters of credit
utilizing availability under our Credit Facilities, leaving $1,576.6 million and $1,637.5 million
of availability under our Credit Facilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The agreements governing our Credit Facilities require us to comply with certain financial and
other covenants. We may pay dividends and repurchase common stock if we are in compliance with
these covenants. Compliance with these covenants is a condition for any incremental borrowings
under our Credit Facilities and failure to meet these covenants would enable the lenders to require
repayment of any outstanding loans (which would adversely affect our liquidity). At June 30, 2011,
our EBITDA to interest ratio was 4.86 compared to the 3.00 minimum required by the covenants, and
our total debt to EBITDA ratio was 3.19 compared to the 3.50 maximum allowed by the covenants. At
June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Credit Facilities, and we expect to
be in compliance throughout 2011.
EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure, is calculated as defined in our Credit Facility agreements. In
this context, EBITDA is used solely to provide information regarding the extent to which we are in
compliance with debt covenants and is not comparable to EBITDA used by other companies or used by
us for other purposes.
Senior Notes and Debentures
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we issued $700.0 million of 3.800% senior notes due
2018 (the 3.800% Notes), $550.0 million of 4.750% senior notes due 2023 (the 4.750% Notes) and
$600.0 million of 5.700% senior notes due 2041 (the 5.700% Notes, and together with the 3.800%
Notes and the 4.750% Notes, the Notes). The Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and
are guaranteed by each of our subsidiaries that also guarantees the Credit Facilities. These
guarantees are general senior unsecured obligations of our subsidiary guarantors. We used the net
proceeds from the Notes as follows (i) $621.4 million to fund the redemption of our $600.0 million
7.125% senior notes maturing in 2016; (ii) $81.6 million to purchase $59.2 million of our
subsidiary Browning-Ferris Industries, LLCs 9.250% debentures maturing in 2021; (iii) $221.8
million to purchase $180.7 million of our subsidiary Browning-Ferris Industries, LLCs 7.400%
debentures maturing in 2035; (iv) $619.0 million to repay borrowings under our revolving credit
facilities; and (v) the remainder for general corporate purposes.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 we completed refinancing transactions
that resulted in cash paid for premiums and professional fees to repurchase outstanding debt as
well as the non-cash write-off of unamortized debt discounts and deferred issuance costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid |
|
|
Non-cash |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Loss on |
|
|
Loss on |
|
|
Loss on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
Extinguishment |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Repaid |
|
|
of Debt |
|
|
of Debt |
|
|
of Debt |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$99.5 million 9.250% debentures due May 2021 |
|
First |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Credit Facilities |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
$600.0 million 7.125% senior notes due May 2016 |
|
Second |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
61.3 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
$99.5 million 9.250% debentures due May 2021 |
|
Second |
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
$360.0 million 7.400% debentures due September 2035 |
|
Second |
|
|
182.7 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
Ineffective portion of interest rate lock settlements |
|
Second |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87.8 |
|
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
201.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable securitization program |
|
First |
|
$ |
300.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$425.0 million 6.125% senior notes due February 2014 |
|
First |
|
|
425.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
$600.0 million 7.250% senior notes due March 2015 |
|
First |
|
|
600.0 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
101.8 |
|
|
$ |
132.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, our 6.375% senior notes matured. We used cash on
hand and incremental borrowings under our Credit Facilities to repay $216.9 million of principal
due on these notes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, our 5.750% senior notes matured. We used cash on hand
and incremental borrowings under our Credit Facilities to repay $262.9 million of principal due on
these notes.
53
In March 2010, we issued $850.0 million of 5.00% senior notes due 2020 and $650.0 million of 6.20%
senior notes due 2040. We used the net proceeds to retire certain outstanding debt and to reduce
amounts outstanding under our Credit Facilities and for general corporate purposes.
Tax-Exempt Financings
At June 30, 2011, we had $1,151.7 million of tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings
outstanding. Borrowings under these bonds and other financings bear interest based on fixed or
floating interest rates at prevailing market rates ranging from 0.08% to 8.25% at June 30, 2011 and
have maturities ranging from 2012 to 2035. As of June 30, 2011, we had $29.2 million of restricted
cash related to proceeds from tax-exempt bonds and other tax-exempt financings. This restricted
cash will be used to reimburse capital expenditures under the terms of the agreements.
Approximately two-thirds of our tax-exempt financings are remarketed quarterly, weekly or daily by
a remarketing agent to effectively maintain a variable yield. Certain of these variable rate
tax-exempt financings are credit enhanced with letters of credit having terms in excess of one year
issued by banks with credit ratings of AA or better. The holders of the bonds can put them back to
the remarketing agent at the end of each interest period. To date, the remarketing agents have been
able to remarket our variable rate unsecured tax-exempt bonds.
Intended Uses of Cash
We intend to use excess cash on hand and cash from operating activities to fund capital
expenditures, acquisitions, dividend payments, share repurchases and debt repayments. Debt
repayments may include purchases of our outstanding indebtedness in the secondary market or
otherwise. We believe that our excess cash, cash from operating activities and our availability to
draw from our Credit Facilities provide us with sufficient financial resources to meet our
anticipated capital requirements and maturing obligations as they come due.
We may choose to voluntarily retire certain portions of our outstanding debt before their maturity
dates using cash from operations or additional borrowings. We also may explore opportunities in
capital markets to fund redemptions should market conditions be favorable. Any early extinguishment
of debt may result in an impairment charge in the period in which the debt is repurchased and
retired. The loss on early extinguishment of debt relates to premiums paid to effectuate the
repurchase and the write off of the relative portion of unamortized note discounts and deferred
issuance costs.
Credit Rating
We have received investment grade credit ratings. As of June 30, 2011, our senior debt was rated
BBB, Baa3, and BBB by Standard & Poors Rating Services, Inc., Moodys Investors Service, Inc. and
Fitch, Inc., respectively.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations, other than financial assurance
instruments and operating leases that are not classified as debt. We do not guarantee any
third-party debt.
Free Cash Flow
We define free cash flow, which is not a measure determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as cash
provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment, plus proceeds from sales
of property and equipment as presented in our unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows.
The following table calculates our free cash flow for the three and six months ended June 30 (in
millions):
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
361.9 |
|
|
$ |
295.7 |
|
|
$ |
795.6 |
|
|
$ |
594.8 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(184.5 |
) |
|
|
(177.0 |
) |
|
|
(481.7 |
) |
|
|
(385.4 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property and
equipment |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
186.8 |
|
|
$ |
125.4 |
|
|
$ |
330.2 |
|
|
$ |
222.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For a discussion of the changes in the components of free cash flow, you should read our discussion
regarding Cash Flows Provided By Operating Activities and Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities
contained elsewhere herein.
Purchases of property and equipment as reflected in our consolidated statements of cash flows and
as presented in the free cash flow table above represent amounts paid during the period for such
expenditures. The following table provides a reconciliation of property and equipment reflected in
the unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows to property and equipment received during the
three and six months ended June 30 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment per the
unaudited
consolidated statements of cash flows |
|
$ |
184.5 |
|
|
$ |
177.0 |
|
|
$ |
481.7 |
|
|
$ |
385.4 |
|
Adjustments for property and equipment received
during the prior period but paid for in the
following period, net |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
(94.1 |
) |
|
|
(57.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment received during the period |
|
$ |
218.6 |
|
|
$ |
199.6 |
|
|
$ |
387.6 |
|
|
$ |
327.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustments noted above do not affect our net change in cash and cash equivalents as reflected
in our unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows.
We believe that the presentation of free cash flow provides useful information regarding our
recurring cash provided by operating activities after expenditures for property and equipment
received, plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment. It also demonstrates our ability to
execute our financial strategy, which includes reinvesting in existing capital assets to ensure a
high level of customer service, investing in capital assets to facilitate growth in our customer
base and services provided, maintaining our investment grade credit rating and minimizing debt,
paying cash dividends and repurchasing common stock, and maintaining and improving our market
position through business optimization. In addition, free cash flow is a key metric used to
determine compensation. The presentation of free cash flow has material limitations. Free cash flow
does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary expenditures because it excludes
certain expenditures that are required or that we have committed to such as debt service
requirements and dividend payments. Our definition of free cash flow may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures presented by other companies.
Seasonality and Severe Weather
Our operations can be adversely affected by periods of inclement or severe weather, which could
increase the volume of waste collected under our existing contracts (without corresponding
compensation), delay the collection and disposal of waste, reduce the volume of waste delivered to
our disposal sites, or delay the construction or expansion of our landfill sites and other
facilities. Our operations also can be favorably affected by severe weather, which could increase
the volume of waste in situations where we are able to charge for our additional services.
Contingencies
For a description of our commitments and contingencies, see Note 6, Landfill and Environmental
Costs, Note 8, Income Taxes, and Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, to our consolidated
financial statements included under Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
55
Critical Accounting Judgments and Estimates
We identified and discussed our critical accounting judgments and estimates in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Although we believe that our estimates and
assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available at the time the judgment or
estimate is made. Actual results may differ significantly from estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
New Accounting Standards
For a description of the new accounting standards that affect us, see Note 1, Basis of Presentation
and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, to our consolidated financial statements included
under Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking information about us that is
intended to be covered by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not
historical facts. Words such as expect, will, may, anticipate, plan, estimate,
project, intend, should, can, likely, could and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These statements include statements about the expected
benefits of the merger and our plans, strategies and prospects. Forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of performance. These statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of
our management and are subject to risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and
statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the expectations will prove to be correct. Among the
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in the
forward-looking statements are:
|
|
|
the impact on us of our substantial indebtedness, including on our ability to obtain
financing on acceptable terms to finance our operations and growth strategy and to operate
within the limitations imposed by financing arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions, including the current global economic and
financial market crisis, inflation and changes in commodity pricing, fuel, labor, risk and
health insurance and other variable costs that are generally not within our control, and our
exposure to credit and counterparty risk; |
|
|
|
|
whether our estimates and assumptions concerning our selected balance sheet accounts,
income tax accounts, final capping, closure, post-closure and remediation costs, available
airspace, and projected costs and expenses related to our landfills and property and
equipment (including our estimates of the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired
in our acquisition of Allied), and labor, fuel rates and economic and inflationary trends,
turn out to be correct or appropriate; |
|
|
|
|
competition and demand for services in the solid waste industry; |
|
|
|
|
the fact that price increases to our customers may not be adequate to offset the impact
of increased costs, including labor, third-party disposal and fuel, and may cause us to lose
volume; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to manage growth and execute our growth strategy; |
|
|
|
|
our compliance with, and future changes in, environmental and flow control regulations
and our ability to obtain approvals from regulatory agencies in connection with operating
and expanding our landfills; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain our investment grade ratings for our debt; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on key personnel; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence on large, long-term collection, transfer and disposal contracts; |
|
|
|
|
our business is capital intensive and may consume cash in excess of cash flow from
operations; |
56
|
|
|
any exposure to environmental liabilities, to the extent not adequately covered by
insurance, could result in substantial expenses; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with undisclosed liabilities of acquired businesses; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with pending and future legal proceedings, including litigation, audits
or investigations brought by or before any governmental body; |
|
|
|
|
severe weather conditions, which could impair our financial results by causing increased
costs, loss of revenue, reduced operational efficiency or disruptions to our operations; |
|
|
|
|
compliance with existing and future legal and regulatory requirements, including
limitations or bans on disposal of certain types of wastes or on the transportation of
waste, which could limit our ability to conduct or grow our business, increase our costs to
operate or require additional capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
|
workforce factors, including potential increases in our costs if we are required to
provide additional funding to any multi-employer pension plan to which we contribute and the
negative impact on our operations of union organizing campaigns, work stoppages or labor
shortages; |
|
|
|
|
the negative effect that trends toward requiring recycling, waste reduction at the source
and prohibiting the disposal of certain types of wastes could have on volumes of waste going
to landfills; |
|
|
|
|
changes by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other accounting regulatory bodies
to generally accepted accounting principles or policies; and |
|
|
|
|
acts of war, riots or terrorism, including the events taking place in the Middle East and
the continuing war on terrorism, as well as actions taken or to be taken by the United
States or other governments as a result of further acts or threats of terrorism, and the
impact of these acts on economic, financial and social conditions in the United States. |
The risks included here are not exhaustive. Refer to Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for further discussion regarding
our exposure to risks. Additionally, new risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not
possible for us to predict all such risk factors, or to assess the impact such risk factors might
have on our business or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should not
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.
Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update
or publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date
hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Fuel Price Risk
Fuel costs represent a significant operating expense. When economically practical, we may enter
into new or renew contracts, or engage in other strategies to mitigate market risk. Where
appropriate, we have implemented a fuel recovery fee that is designed to recover our fuel costs.
While we charge these fees to a majority of our customers, we cannot charge such fees to all
customers.
Consequently, an increase in fuel costs results in (1) an increase in our cost of operations, (2) a
smaller increase in our revenue (from the fuel recovery fee) and (3) a decrease in our operating
margin percentage, because the increase in revenue is more than offset by the increase in cost.
Conversely, a decrease in fuel costs results in (1) a decrease in our cost of operations, (2) a
smaller decrease in our revenue and (3) an increase in our operating margin percentage.
At our current consumption levels, a one-cent change in the price of diesel fuel changes our fuel
costs by $1.4 million on an annual basis, which would be partially offset by a smaller change in
the fuel recovery fees charged to our customers. Accordingly, a substantial rise or drop in fuel
costs could result in a material impact to our revenue and cost of operations.
57
Our operations also require the use of certain petroleum-based products (such as liners at our
landfills) whose costs may vary with the price of oil. An increase in the price of petrochemicals
could increase the cost of those products, which would increase our operating and capital costs. We
are also susceptible to increases in indirect fuel surcharges from our vendors.
Commodities Price Risk
We market recycled products such as cardboard and newspaper from our material recycling facilities.
As a result, changes in the market prices of these items will impact our results of operations.
Revenue from sales of these products during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $205.6
million and $148.8 million, respectively.
See Note 11, Other Comprehensive Income and Financial Instruments, of the notes to our unaudited
consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our fuel and recycling commodity
hedges.
Interest Rate Risk
We are subject to interest rate risk on our variable rate long-term debt. From time to time, to
reduce the risk from interest rate fluctuations, we have entered into interest rate swap contracts
that have been authorized pursuant to our policies and procedures. We do not use financial
instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any leveraged derivatives.
At
June 30, 2011, we had $866.5 million of floating rate debt and $210.0 million of floating
interest rate swap contracts. If interest rates increased or decreased by 100 basis points,
annualized interest expense and cash payments for interest would increase or decrease by
approximately $11 million. This analysis does not reflect the effect that interest rates would have
on other items, such as new borrowings. See Note 7, Debt, of the notes to our unaudited
consolidated financial statements for further information regarding how we manage interest rate
risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e), and 15d-15(e)) as
of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Based on an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, there has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this Form 10-Q identified in
connection with that evaluation, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We are subject to extensive and evolving laws and regulations and have implemented our own
safeguards to respond to regulatory requirements. In the normal course of conducting our
operations, we become involved in legal proceedings. Some of these actions may result in fines,
penalties or judgments against us, which may impact earnings and cash flows for a particular
period. Although we cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any legal matter with certainty, except
as described below or in Note 7 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements, Income Taxes,
in the discussion of our outstanding tax dispute with the IRS, we do not believe that the outcome
of our pending legal proceedings will have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
As used herein, legal proceedings refers to litigation and similar claims against us and our
subsidiaries, excluding: (i) ordinary course accidents, general commercial liability and workers
compensation claims, which are covered by insurance programs, subject to
58
customary deductibles, and which, together with self-insured employee health care costs, are
discussed in Note 4 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements, Other
Liabilities-Self-Insurance Reserves; (ii) tax-related matters, which are discussed in Note 7 to our
unaudited consolidated financial statements, Income Taxes; and (iii) environmental remediation
liabilities, which are discussed in Note 5 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements,
Landfill and Environmental Costs. Please see our unaudited consolidated financial statements
included in this Form 10-Q under Item 1 for information about these matters.
We accrue for legal proceedings when losses become probable and reasonably estimable. We have
recorded an aggregate accrual of approximately $111 million relating to our outstanding legal
proceedings as of June 30, 2011, including those described herein and others not specifically
identified herein. As of the end of each applicable reporting period, we review each of our legal
proceedings and, where it is probable that a liability has been incurred, we accrue for all
probable and reasonably estimable losses. Where we are able to reasonably estimate a range of
losses we may incur with respect to such a matter, we record an accrual for the amount within the
range that constitutes our best estimate. If we are able to reasonably estimate a range but no
amount within the range appears to be a better estimate than any other, we use the amount that is
the low end of such range. If we used the high ends of such ranges, our aggregate potential
liability would have been approximately $110 million higher than the amount recorded as of June 30,
2011.
General Legal Proceedings
Countywide Matter
In a suit filed on October 8, 2008 in the Tuscarawas County Ohio Court of Common Pleas,
approximately 700 individuals and businesses located in the area around Countywide sued Republic
Services, Inc. and Republic-Ohio for alleged negligence and nuisance. Republic-Ohio has owned and
operated Countywide since February 1, 1999. Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management Ohio, Inc.,
previous owners and operators of Countywide, have been named as defendants as well. Plaintiffs
allege that due to the acceptance of a specific waste stream and operational issues and conditions,
the landfill has generated odors and other unsafe emissions that have impaired the use and value of
their property and may have adverse health effects. A second almost identical lawsuit was filed by
approximately 82 plaintiffs on October 13, 2009 in the Tuscarawas County Ohio Court of Common Pleas
against Republic Services, Inc., Republic-Ohio, Waste Management, Inc., and Waste Management Ohio,
Inc. The court has consolidated the two actions. We have assumed both the defense and the liability
of the Waste Management entities in the consolidated action. The relief requested on behalf of each
plaintiff in the consolidated action is: (1) an award of compensatory damages according to proof in
an amount in excess of $25,000 for each of the three counts of the amended complaint; (2) an award
of punitive damages in the amount of two times compensatory damages, pursuant to applicable
statute, or in such amount as may be awarded at trial for each of the three counts of the amended
complaint; (3) costs for medical screening and monitoring of each plaintiff; (4) interest on the
damages according to law; (5) costs and disbursements of the lawsuit; (6) reasonable fees for
attorneys and expert witnesses; and (7) any other and further relief as the court deems just,
proper and equitable. Plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint on September 9, 2010,
which no longer asserts a claim for medical monitoring. As a result of various dismissals of
plaintiffs, this case presently consists of approximately 600 plaintiffs. Discovery is ongoing. In
February 2011, the court granted our motion to dismiss plaintiffs qualified statutory public
nuisance claims. We will continue to vigorously defend against the plaintiffs allegations in the
consolidated action.
Luri Matter
On August 17, 2007, a former employee, Ronald Luri, sued Republic Services, Inc., Republic Services
of Ohio Hauling LLC, Republic Services of Ohio I LLC, Jim Bowen and Ron Krall in the Cuyahoga
County Common Pleas Court in Ohio. Plaintiff alleges that he was unlawfully fired in retaliation
for refusing to discharge or demote three employees who were all over 50 years old. On July 3,
2008, a jury verdict was awarded against us in the amount of $46.6 million, including $43.1 million
in punitive damages. On September 24, 2008, the court awarded pre-judgment interest of $0.3 million
and attorney fees and litigation costs of $1.1 million. Post-judgment interest accrued at a rate of
8% for 2008 and 5% for 2009, and is accruing at a rate of 4% thereafter. Management anticipates
that post-judgment interest could accrue through the middle of 2012 for a total of up to $9.0 million. We
appealed to the Court of Appeals, and on May 19, 2011 the court reduced the punitive damages award
to $7.0 million. Both sides are now pursuing an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court. It is reasonably possible
that following all appeals a final judgment of liability for compensatory and punitive damages may
be assessed against us related to this matter.
Litigation Related to Fuel and Administrative Fees
On November 20, 2009, Klinglers European Bake Shop & Deli, Inc., filed a complaint against BFI
Waste Services, LLC in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, in which plaintiff complains
about fuel recovery fees and administrative fees charged.
59
The complaint purports to be filed on behalf of a class of similarly situated plaintiffs in
Alabama. This complaint asserts various legal and equitable theories of recovery and alleges in
essence that the fees were not properly disclosed, were unfair, and were contrary to contract.
Class-certification-related discovery is underway. Plaintiffs deadline for moving for class
certification is November 10, 2011. Plaintiff has not specified the amount of damages sought.
Although the range of reasonably possible loss cannot be estimated, we do not believe that this
matter will have a material impact on our consolidated financial positions, results of operations
or cash flows. We will continue to vigorously defend the claims in this lawsuit.
Proxy Disclosure Matter
In late 2009, a stockholder sued Republic Services, Inc. in Federal court in Delaware challenging
our disclosures in our 2009 proxy statement with respect to the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) that
was approved by our stockholders at the 2009 annual meeting. The lawsuit is styled as a combined
proxy disclosure claim and derivative action. We are a defendant only with respect to the proxy
disclosure claim, which seeks only to require us to make additional disclosures regarding the EIP
and to hold a new stockholder vote prior to making any payments under the EIP. The derivative claim
is purportedly brought on behalf of our company against all of our directors and the individuals
who were executive officers at the time of the 2009 annual meeting and alleges, among other things,
breach of fiduciary duty. That claim also seeks injunctive relief and seeks to recoup on behalf of
our company an unspecified amount of the incentive compensation that may be paid to our executives
under the EIP, as well as the amount of any tax deductions that may be lost if the EIP does not
comply with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Defendants motions to dismiss plaintiffs
complaint have been fully briefed. On March 30, 2011, the court granted the companys motion to
dismiss the proxy disclosure claim with prejudice for failure to state a claim, and dismissed the
derivative action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. No appeal was filed and the dismissal
is therefore considered final.
Compensation Matter
Shortly after the dismissal of his lawsuit in the Proxy Disclosure Matter discussed above, the same
plaintiff sued Republic Services, Inc., its directors, and several executive officers in the Court
of Chancery in Delaware. His new lawsuit, filed in May 2011, challenges certain compensation
decisions that were made by the Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee. The lawsuit is
purportedly brought on behalf of our company against all of our directors and several executive
officers. In particular, the plaintiffs complaint: (1) challenges certain payments totaling $3.05
million to our former Chief Executive Officer, James OConnor, under his June 25, 2010
Retirement Agreement; (2) contends that the company committed waste by awarding restricted stock
units that vest over time (which typically would not be tax deductible) rather than awarding
performance-based units (which typically would be tax deductible); and (3) alleges that the Board
overpaid itself by awarding directors too many restricted stock units in 2009 and 2010. The
complaint seeks injunctive relief and seeks an equitable accounting for unspecified losses the
company purportedly sustained. We believe the lawsuit is without merit and is not material. The
defendants will defend the lawsuit vigorously and have filed motions to dismiss the complaint.
Contracting Matter
We discovered actions of non-compliance by one of our subsidiaries with the subcontracting
provisions of certain government contracts in one of our markets. We reported the discovery to, and
have had further discussions with, law enforcement and other authorities. Such non-compliance could
result in payments by us in the form of restitution, damages, or penalties, or the loss of future
business in the affected market or other markets. Based on the information currently available to
us, including our expectation that our self-disclosure will be viewed favorably by the applicable
authorities, we presently believe that the resolution of the matter, while it may have a material
impact on our results of operations or cash flows in the period in which it is recognized or paid,
will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position.
Congress Development Landfill Matters
Congress Development Co. (CDC) is a general partnership that owns and operates the Congress
Landfill. The general partners in CDC are our subsidiary, Allied Waste Transportation, Inc. (Allied
Transportation), and an unaffiliated entity, John Sexton Sand & Gravel Corporation (Sexton). Sexton
was the operator of the landfill through early 2007, when Allied Transportation took over as the
operator. The general partners likely will be jointly and severally liable for the costs associated
with the following matters relating to the Congress Landfill.
In a suit originally filed on December 23, 2009 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois and
subsequently amended to add additional plaintiffs, approximately 2,400 plaintiffs sued our
subsidiaries Allied Transportation and Allied Waste Industries, Inc., CDC
60
and Sexton. The plaintiffs allege bodily injury, property damage and inability to have normal use
and enjoyment of property arising from, among other things, odors and other damages arising from
landfill gas leaking, and they base their claims on negligence, trespass, and nuisance. On April
29, 2011, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint to seek punitive damages.
Briefing on that motion is ongoing.
Following the courts order in our favor striking the plaintiffs allegations requesting actual
damages in excess of $50 million and punitive damages in excess of $50 million, the amount of
damages being sought is unspecified. The court entered an order dismissing Allied Waste Industries,
Inc. without prejudice on October 26, 2010. Discovery is ongoing. We intend to vigorously defend
against the plaintiffs allegations in this action.
Livingston Matter
On October 13, 2009, the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, State of
Louisiana, issued its Post Class Certification Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in a lawsuit
alleging nuisance from the activities of the CECOS hazardous waste facility located in Livingston
Parish, Louisiana. The court granted class certification for all those living within a six mile
radius of the CECOS site between the years 1977 and 1990. We have filed a notice of appeal with
respect to the class certification order and oral argument is scheduled for August, 2011. The
parties are working toward resolving the lawsuit through a negotiated settlement. If these efforts
are not successful, we intend to continue to defend this lawsuit vigorously.
Legal Proceedings over Certain Environmental Matters Involving Governmental Authorities with
Possible Sanctions of $100,000 or More
Item 103 of the SECs Regulation S-K requires disclosure of certain environmental matters when a
governmental authority is a party to the proceedings and the proceedings involve potential monetary
sanctions unless we reasonably believe that the monetary sanctions will not equal or exceed
$100,000. We are disclosing the following matters in accordance with that requirement:
Forward Matters
The District Attorney for San Joaquin County filed a civil action against Forward, Inc. and Allied
Waste Industries, Inc. on February 14, 2008 in the Superior Court of California, County of San
Joaquin. The complaint seeks civil penalties of $2,500 for each alleged violation, but no less than
$10.0 million, and an injunction against Forward and Allied for alleged permit and regulatory
violations at the Forward Landfill. The District Attorney contends that the alleged violations
constitute unfair business practices under the California Business and Professions Code section
17200, et seq., by virtue of violations of Public Resources Code Division 30, Part 4, Chapter 3,
Article 1, sections 44004 and 44014(b); California Code of Regulations Title 27, Chapter 3,
Subchapter 4, Article 6, sections 20690(11) and 20919.5; and Health and Safety Code sections 25200,
25100, et seq., and 25500, et seq. Although the complaint is worded very broadly and does not
identify specific permit or regulatory violations, the District Attorney has articulated three
primary concerns in past communications, alleging that the landfill: (1) used green waste
containing food as alternative daily cover, (2) exceeded its daily solid waste tonnage receipt
limitations under its solid waste facility permit, and (3) received hazardous waste in violation of
its permit (i.e., auto shredder waste). Additionally, the District Attorney alleges that landfill
gas measured by a monitoring probe at the property boundary has exceeded an action level of five
percent methane. We are vigorously defending against the allegations.
On March 2, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IX and the San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District filed a civil action against Forward, Inc. in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint seeks civil penalties of up
to $75,000 for each day of alleged violation, an order directing Forward to comply with various
Clean Air Act regulations and the landfills Title V permit, and unspecified injunctive relief. The
facility is jointly regulated by the EPA and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.
The alleged violations include operating gas collection wellheads at greater than 15% oxygen,
experiencing a subsurface oxidation event on multiple occasions, submitting inaccurate compliance
certifications, and operating a compost facility and associated equipment without a permit. We are
undergoing nonbinding mediation with the agencies as we continue to vigorously defend against the
allegations.
Sunshine Canyon Matter
On November 17, 2009, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) issued a Petition
for an Order for Abatement (Petition) as a result of a series of odor complaints and notices of
violation alleged to be associated with the operations at the Sunshine Canyon Landfill located in
Sylmar, California (Sunshine Canyon). The Petition described eight notices of violation beginning
in
61
November 2008 and continuing to November 2009. The SCAQMDs independent Hearing Board held a series
of public hearings between December 2009 and March 2010, after which it issued a final order
(Order) that requires certain operational changes aimed at odor control, and further requires
Sunshine Canyon to perform several studies regarding odor control techniques, equipment and site
meteorology. In July 2010, the Hearing Board approved an amended Order suspending certain
operational requirements contained in the initial Order pending completion of additional odor
control studies. While the District prosecutors office has stated its intention to assess a
penalty on Sunshine Canyon, it has not indicated the amount or type of such a penalty. In September
2010, the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works (Department) issued a directive to
Sunshine Canyon requiring the implementation of certain corrective measures aimed at reducing
odors. Since September 2010 and continuing into 2011, Sunshine Canyon has received several Notices
of Violation from the SCAQMD based on confirmed odor complaints from the neighborhood near the
landfill.
Lorain County Landfill Matter
Since 2006, the Lorain County Landfill located in Lorain, Ohio has agreed to two consensual
Directors Final Findings and Orders (DFFOs) issued by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
related to operational issues, including odor nuisances. The Ohio Attorney Generals office has
advised us that it intends to initiate legal proceedings against our subsidiary, Lorain County
Landfill, LLC, and against Lorain County LFG Power Station Energy Developments, Inc., which has
operated and maintained the landfills gas collection system, for violations that are alleged to
continue to occur in violation of the DFFOs and are related to continuing alleged nuisance odors.
We are engaging in discussions with representatives of the Attorney Generals office to attempt to
amicably resolve the States issues and to negotiate a consent order that would be filed with the
common pleas court. The Attorney Generals office has communicated an initial settlement demand to
Lorain County Landfill, LLC. We understand that the Attorney Generals Office also is seeking a
penalty against Lorain County LFG Power Station Energy Developments, Inc. The Attorney Generals
office also is seeking injunctive relief related to ongoing landfill operations, including the
landfill gas collection and control system. Settlement discussions with the Attorney Generals
office are ongoing.
Queen Creek Matter
The Maricopa County Air Quality Department issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the Maricopa
County Solid Waste Department in March 2010 and to the Town of Queen Creek (Queen Creek) and Allied
Waste Industries (Arizona), Inc. (Allied Waste) in October 2010 relating to the Queen Creek
Landfill (Landfill). The NOV alleges violations of the Clean Air Act relating to the Landfill while
it was in operation. The Landfill was owned by Maricopa County and operated by Allied Waste under
contract with Queen Creek between 1996 and 2007, at which time it was closed. The NOV alleges the
failure to design, install and operate a landfill gas collection control system, failure to timely
apply for an air quality permit, and failure to provide required reports relating to landfill
capacity, status and closure. Under the terms of several intergovernmental agreements between
Maricopa County and Queen Creek, Maricopa County agreed to be responsible for the majority of
activities that are the subject of the NOVs and to indemnify Queen Creek and its contractors for
Maricopa Countys failure to meet its obligations under the agreements. We will vigorously defend
against the allegations and seek indemnification from Maricopa County.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
There were no material changes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 in the risk factors
previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information relating to our purchases of shares of our common stock
during the three months ended June 30, 2011:
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Value of Shares that |
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
May Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Purchased (a) |
|
|
per Share (a) |
|
|
Announced Program (b) |
|
|
Under the Program (c) |
|
April 2011 |
|
|
37,474 |
|
|
$ |
29.27 |
|
|
|
37,412 |
|
|
$ |
210,411,727 |
|
May 2011 |
|
|
2,362,220 |
|
|
$ |
32.06 |
|
|
|
2,362,220 |
|
|
$ |
134,679,790 |
|
June 2011 |
|
|
1,242,916 |
|
|
$ |
30.66 |
|
|
|
1,236,209 |
|
|
$ |
96,770,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,642,610 |
|
|
$ |
31.56 |
|
|
|
3,635,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we may
repurchase up to $400.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock through December 31,
2011 (the 2010 Program). The 2010 Program was publicly announced on November 4, 2010. Share
repurchases under the 2010 Program may be made through open market purchases or privately
negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. While the board
of directors has approved the 2010 Program, the timing of any purchases, the prices and the
number of shares of common stock to be purchased will be determined by our management, at its
discretion, and will depend upon market conditions and other factors. The 2010 Program may be
extended, suspended or discontinued at any time. |
|
(b) |
|
The total number of shares purchased during the three months ended June 30, 2011 includes:
(i) 3,635,841 shares of common stock purchased pursuant to the 2010 Program; and (ii) 6,769
shares of common stock surrendered to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding obligations in
connection with the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees. We expect to continue to
satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of outstanding
restricted stock through the withholding of shares. |
|
(c) |
|
Shares that may be purchased under the program excludes shares of common stock that may be
surrendered to satisfy statutory minimum tax withholding obligations in connection with the
vesting of restricted stock issued to employees. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
4.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2011, by and among Republic
Services, Inc., as Borrower, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line
Lender and L/C Issuer, the other lenders party thereto and the Guarantors party thereto
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
dated April 21, 2011). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 20, 2011, by and among Republic
Services, Inc., as Borrower, the Guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, and each of the lenders signatory thereto (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2011). |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 9, 2011, to the
Indenture, dated as of September 8, 2009, by and among Republic
Services, Inc., the guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York
Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys |
63
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9,
2011). |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 9, 2011, to the
Indenture, dated as of September 8, 2009, by and among Republic
Services, Inc., the guarantors named therein and the Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K dated May 9, 2011). |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 9, 2011, to the
Indenture, dated as of September 8, 2009, by and among Republic
Services, Inc., the guarantors named therein and the Bank of New
York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K dated May 9, 2011). |
|
|
|
10.1+
|
|
Republic Services Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Companys
Definitive Proxy Statement dated April 1, 2011). |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
101.INS**
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF**
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
+ |
|
Indicates a management or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
This exhibit is being furnished rather than filed, and shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference into any filing, in accordance with
Item 601 of Regulation S-K. |
64
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant, Republic
Services, Inc., has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 28, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ TOD C. HOLMES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tod C. Holmes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: July 28, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ CHARLES F. SERIANNI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles F. Serianni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
65