e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 |
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-20278
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
75-2274963
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1329 Millwood Road
McKinney, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
75069
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (972) 562-9473
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number
of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01, outstanding as of August 4, 2011: 23,292,475
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements. |
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(See Note) |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
46,802 |
|
|
$ |
103,252 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance
of $2,579 and $2,582) |
|
|
246,750 |
|
|
|
190,364 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
55,155 |
|
|
|
42,104 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes receivable |
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
4,485 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
357,056 |
|
|
|
342,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and land improvements |
|
|
17,971 |
|
|
|
17,971 |
|
Construction-in-progress |
|
|
8,758 |
|
|
|
15,564 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
75,611 |
|
|
|
69,440 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
179,993 |
|
|
|
174,916 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
7,440 |
|
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
|
289,773 |
|
|
|
284,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(155,579 |
) |
|
|
(149,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net |
|
|
134,194 |
|
|
|
134,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
491,472 |
|
|
$ |
477,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010, as presented, is
derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. |
See accompanying notes.
1
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
In Thousands of Dollars, Except Share Data |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(See Note) |
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
30,070 |
|
|
$ |
32,897 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
21,969 |
|
|
|
23,191 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
52,039 |
|
|
|
58,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred income taxes |
|
|
12,018 |
|
|
|
11,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized shares 2,000,000; none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized shares 40,000,000;
Issued shares 26,442,752 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,366,752 |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
45,893 |
|
|
|
45,040 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost 3,150,277 and 3,150,277 shares |
|
|
(21,294 |
) |
|
|
(21,294 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
402,552 |
|
|
|
383,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
427,415 |
|
|
|
407,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
491,472 |
|
|
$ |
477,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010, as presented, is
derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. |
See accompanying notes.
2
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
In Thousands, Except Per Share Data |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
309,469 |
|
|
$ |
236,094 |
|
|
$ |
612,820 |
|
|
$ |
411,323 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
278,837 |
|
|
|
209,179 |
|
|
|
548,432 |
|
|
|
373,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
30,632 |
|
|
|
26,915 |
|
|
|
64,388 |
|
|
|
37,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses |
|
|
16,083 |
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
34,232 |
|
|
|
26,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
14,549 |
|
|
|
12,847 |
|
|
|
30,156 |
|
|
|
11,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest and other (income) expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
14,549 |
|
|
|
12,753 |
|
|
|
30,161 |
|
|
|
8,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
4,618 |
|
|
|
10,046 |
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,461 |
|
|
$ |
8,135 |
|
|
$ |
20,115 |
|
|
$ |
5,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common and common
equivalent share basic |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares basic |
|
|
23,264 |
|
|
|
23,171 |
|
|
|
23,241 |
|
|
|
23,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common and common
equivalent share diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares diluted |
|
|
23,405 |
|
|
|
23,334 |
|
|
|
23,392 |
|
|
|
23,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
20,115 |
|
|
$ |
5,669 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
6,861 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
Long-term debt prepayment fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
Other |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(56,386 |
) |
|
|
(49,287 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(13,051 |
) |
|
|
2,571 |
|
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(4,050 |
) |
|
|
6,681 |
|
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
(773 |
) |
|
|
1,120 |
|
Current income taxes receivable / payable |
|
|
(3,040 |
) |
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(50,619 |
) |
|
|
(21,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(5,515 |
) |
|
|
(11,175 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(5,515 |
) |
|
|
(11,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,919 |
) |
Deferred financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Proceeds from issuances of common stock |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Dividend paid |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
(927 |
) |
Excess tax benefits of options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(103,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(56,450 |
) |
|
|
(136,266 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
103,252 |
|
|
|
226,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
46,802 |
|
|
$ |
90,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Encore Wire Corporation (the Company) have
been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim
information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they
do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for complete annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation, have been included. Results of operations for interim periods presented do not
necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the entire year. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010.
NOTE 2 INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, or
market.
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
18,465 |
|
|
$ |
27,092 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
31,673 |
|
|
|
19,889 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
93,244 |
|
|
|
81,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,382 |
|
|
|
128,921 |
|
Adjust to LIFO cost |
|
|
(88,227 |
) |
|
|
(86,817 |
) |
Lower of cost or market adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,155 |
|
|
$ |
42,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFO pools are established at the end of each fiscal year. During the first three quarters of
every year, LIFO calculations are based on the inventory levels and costs at that time.
Accordingly, interim LIFO balances will fluctuate up and down in tandem with inventory levels and
costs.
During the first six months of 2011, the Company did not liquidate any LIFO inventory layers
established in prior years. During the first six months of 2010, the Company liquidated a portion
of the layer established in 2005. As a result, under the LIFO method, this inventory layer was
liquidated at historical costs that were less than current costs, which favorably impacted net
income for the second quarter of 2010 by $644,000 and the first six months of 2010 by $1,480,000.
5
NOTE 3 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
In Thousands of Dollars |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Sales volume discounts payable |
|
$ |
15,397 |
|
|
$ |
14,997 |
|
Property taxes payable |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
2,648 |
|
Commissions payable |
|
|
2,638 |
|
|
|
2,290 |
|
Accrued salaries |
|
|
1,891 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,969 |
|
|
$ |
23,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4 INCOME TAXES
Income taxes were accrued at an effective rate of 35.0% in the second quarter of 2011 versus 36.2%
in the second quarter of 2010, consistent with the Companys estimated liabilities. For the six
months ended June 30, the Companys effective tax rate was approximately 33.3% in 2011 and 34.6% in
2010.
NOTE 5 NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Net earnings (loss) per common and common equivalent share are computed using the weighted average
number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. If
dilutive, the effect of stock options, treated as common stock equivalents, is calculated using the
treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
In Thousands |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,461 |
|
|
$ |
8,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic
earnings per share
weighted average
shares |
|
|
23,264 |
|
|
|
23,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
weighted average shares |
|
|
23,405 |
|
|
|
23,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
The number of weighted average employee stock options excluded from the determination of diluted earnings per share for the
second quarter was 80,500 in 2011 and 211,857 in 2010. Such options were anti-dilutive for the respective periods.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
In Thousands |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
20,115 |
|
|
$ |
5,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per
share weighted average shares |
|
|
23,241 |
|
|
|
23,165 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per
share weighted average shares |
|
|
23,392 |
|
|
|
23,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of weighted average employee stock options excluded from the determination of
diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30 was 80,500 in 2011 and 347,758 in 2010. Such options were
anti-dilutive for the respective periods.
NOTE 6 LONG TERM NOTES PAYABLE
The Company is party to a Financing Agreement with two banks, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (as amended, the Financing Agreement). The Financing
Agreement extends through August 6, 2013, and provides for maximum borrowings of the lesser of
$150,000,000 or the amount of eligible accounts receivable plus the amount of eligible finished
goods and raw materials, less any reserves established by the banks. The calculated maximum
borrowing amount available at June 30, 2011, as computed under the Financing Agreement, was
$149,660,000. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest, at the Companys option, at either
(1) LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 1.0% to 1.75% depending upon the ratio of debt outstanding
to adjusted earnings or (2) the base rate (which is the higher of the federal funds rate plus 0.5%
or the prime rate) plus 0% to 0.25% (depending upon the ratio of debt outstanding to adjusted
earnings). A commitment fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.375% (depending upon the ratio of debt
outstanding to adjusted earnings) is payable on the unused line of credit. At June 30, 2011, there
were no borrowings outstanding under the Financing Agreement. Obligations under the Financing
Agreement are the only contractual borrowing obligations or commercial borrowing commitments of the
Company.
7
Obligations under the Financing Agreement are unsecured and contain customary covenants and events
of default. The Company was in compliance with the covenants as of June 30, 2011.
NOTE 7 STOCK REPURCHASE AUTHORIZATION
On November 10, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the
Company to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through December 31, 2007 on the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prices determined by the President of
the Company. The Companys Board of Directors has subsequently authorized annual extensions of
this stock repurchase program through March 31, 2012 and has authorized the repurchase of up to
2,610,000 shares of its common stock. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its stock in
the first six months of 2011 or 2010.
NOTE 8 CONTINGENCIES
On July 7, 2009, Southwire Company, a Delaware corporation (Southwire), filed a complaint for
patent infringement against the Company and Cerro Wire, Inc. (Cerro) in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In the complaint, Southwire alleged that the
Company infringed one or more claims of United States Patent No. 7,557,301 (the 301 patent),
entitled Method of Manufacturing Electrical Cable Having Reduced Required Force for Installation,
by making and selling electrical cables, including the Companys Super Slick cables. The case has
been transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and the parties have agreed to stay it pending
reexamination of the 301 patent by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the USPTO).
On June 23, 2011, the USPTO issued an office action in the reexamination finally rejecting all the
claims of the 301 patent. Southwire has until August 7, 2011 to file a written response with the
USPTO.
On August 24, 2009, Southwire filed a second complaint for patent and trademark infringement
against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In the
second complaint, Southwire alleged that the Company infringed one or more of the claims of United
States Patent No. 6,486,395 entitled Interlocked Metal Clad Cable (the 395 Patent) by making
and selling electrical cables, including the Companys MCMP Multipurpose cables. Southwire also
alleged that the Company infringed Southwires United States Trademark Registration No. 3,292,777
for the mark, MCAP. The second complaint also alleged a variety of related federal and state
statutory and common law claims including unfair competition. The Company filed counterclaims
against Southwire alleging claims of statutory and common law unfair competition, tortious
interference with existing and prospective business relations, misappropriation and claims for
declaratory relief. The parties dismissed without prejudice all claims and counterclaims of the
case. An agreed dismissal order was entered April 14, 2011.
On July 2, 2010, the Company filed a complaint against Southwire in the Northern District of
Georgia. The complaint alleged that Southwire was using a deceptively misdescriptive trademark on
its SimPull products, and that Southwire had made false statements about the Companys Slick Wire
products. Southwires United States Patent No. 7,749,024 (the 024 patent) issued on July 6,
2010. The morning the patent issued, the Company amended its complaint to seek a declaratory
judgment that the
8
Companys Slick Wire products do not infringe the 024 patent. Later that same day, Southwire
filed a separate complaint against the Company and Cerro Wire in the Eastern District of Texas
alleging infringement of the 024 patent. The Companys complaint against Southwire was stayed by
agreement on April 11, 2011. The case will remain stayed until the USPTO issues a certificate of
reexamination of the 024 patent. The complaint filed by Southwire in the Eastern District of
Texas has been voluntarily dismissed and Southwire will have the option to pursue its claims
against the Company in the Northern District of Georgia, once the reexamination is completed. On
October 8, 2010, the Company filed a request with the USPTO for an inter partes reexamination of
the 024 patent. On November 9, 2010, the USPTO ordered the reexamination of the 024 patent. In
ordering reexamination of Southwires 024 patent, the USPTO determined that the Companys
submission of prior art raised a substantial new question of patentability of the claims of the
024 patent. On December 3, 2010, the USPTO issued a non-final office action rejecting all of the
claims of the 024 Patent. Southwire filed a response to the non-final office action on February
3, 2011, which included legal arguments and supporting technical declarations. The Company filed
its comments to the Southwire response on March 3, 2011, including points and authorities, legal
arguments, and supporting technical declarations. The reexamination continues and the parties are
awaiting the Examiners action on the parties latest filings.
Southwires complaints sought unspecified damages and injunctive relief. At this time, all pending
litigation between Encore and Southwire has been dismissed or stayed pending the outcome of the
reexaminations of the 024 and 301 Patents.
The potentially applicable factual and legal issues related to the above claims asserted against
the Company have not been resolved. The Company is currently unable to determine if liability is
probable, and the Company cannot reasonably estimate the amount of any potential loss associated
with these matters. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a liability for these pending
lawsuits. The Company disputes all of Southwires claims and alleged damages and intends to
vigorously defend the lawsuits and vigorously pursue its own claims against Southwire if and when
the litigation resumes. The Company is also a party to litigation and claims arising out of the
ordinary business of the Company.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
General
Encore is a low-cost manufacturer of copper electrical building wire and cable. The Company is a
significant supplier of building wire for interior electrical wiring in commercial and industrial
buildings, homes, apartments, and manufactured housing.
The Companys operating results in any given time period are driven by several key factors,
including the volume of product produced and shipped, the cost of copper and other raw materials,
the competitive pricing environment in the wire industry and the resulting influence on gross
margins and the efficiency with which the Companys plants operate during the period, among others.
Price competition for electrical wire and cable is intense, and the Company sells its products in
accordance with prevailing market prices. Copper is the principal raw material used by the Company
in manufacturing its products. Copper accounted for approximately 81.1% and 73.5% of the Companys
cost
9
of goods sold during fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively. The price of copper fluctuates, depending
on general economic conditions and in relation to supply and demand and other factors, which causes
monthly variations in the cost of copper purchased by the Company. The Company cannot predict
future copper prices or the effect of fluctuations in the cost of copper on the Companys future
operating results.
The following discussion and analysis relates to factors that have affected the operating results
of the Company for the quarterly and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Reference
should also be made to the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Results of Operations
Quarter Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
Net sales for the second quarter of 2011 were $309.5 million compared with net sales of $236.1
million for the second quarter of 2010. This dollar increase was primarily the result of a 28.6%
increase in the price of wire sold and a 1.9% increase in the unit volume of product shipped. Unit
volume is measured in pounds of copper contained in the wire shipped during the period. The
average cost per pound of raw copper purchased increased 30.7% in the second quarter of 2011
compared to the second quarter of 2010, and was the principal driver of the increased average sales
price of wire. Fluctuations in sales prices are primarily a result of changing copper raw material
prices and product price competition.
Cost of goods sold increased to $278.8 million, or 90.1% of net sales, in the second quarter of
2011, compared to $209.2 million, or 88.6% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2010. Gross
profit increased to $30.6 million, or 9.9% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2011 versus $26.9
million, or 11.4% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2010. The increased gross profit dollars
resulted primarily from the large sales dollar increase while the small decrease in gross profit
margin percentage was primarily the result of the increased total cost of all raw materials,
including the LIFO adjustment, as a percentage of net sales. This total cost of raw materials
percentage increased from 81.1% in the second quarter of 2010 to 83.7% in the second quarter of
2011.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, as calculated using the last-in, first out (LIFO)
method, or market. The Company maintains only one inventory pool for LIFO purposes as all
inventories held by the Company generally relate to the Companys only business segment, the
manufacture and sale of copper electrical building wire products. The Company maintains its
inventory costs and cost of goods sold on a first-in, first-out (FIFO) basis and makes a monthly
adjustment to adjust total inventory and cost of goods sold from FIFO to LIFO. The Company applies
the lower of cost or market (LCM) test by comparing the LIFO cost of its raw materials,
work-in-process and finished goods inventories to estimated market values, which are based
primarily upon the most recent quoted market price of copper and finished wire prices as of the end
of each reporting period. The Company performs a lower of cost or market calculation quarterly.
Based on copper prices as of June 30, 2011, no LCM adjustment was required. However, decreases in
copper prices could necessitate establishing an LCM reserve in future periods. Additionally,
future reductions in the quantity of inventory on hand could cause copper that is carried in
inventory at costs different from the cost of copper in the period
10
in which the reduction occurs to be included in costs of goods sold for that period at the
different price.
Copper costs were mildly volatile during the quarter, falling early and then recovering slightly
near the end of the quarter. Primarily due to decreasing copper
costs, slightly offset by
a small increase in inventory quantities on hand during the second quarter of 2011, a LIFO
adjustment was recorded decreasing cost of sales by $6.8 million during the quarter.
Selling expenses, consisting of commissions and freight, for the second quarter of 2011 were $12.6
million, or 4.1% of net sales, compared to $10.0 million, or 4.3% of net sales, in the second
quarter of 2010. Commissions paid to independent manufacturers representatives are paid as a
relatively stable percentage of sales, and therefore, rose $1.6 million in concert with the
increased sales dollars. Additionally, freight costs increased by $1.0 million due partially to
the 1.9% increase in unit sales. Freight barely declined as a percentage of net sales due to the
fact that freight rose on a cost per pound basis due to increased fuel prices, smaller customers
order quantities and small shifts in demand from various areas of the country. General and
administrative expenses decreased slightly to $3.5 million, or 1.1% of net sales, in the second
quarter of 2011 compared to $4.0 million, or 1.7% of net sales, in the second quarter of 2010. The
decrease was primarily the result of a gain on the exchange of assets of $534,000 recognized in
2011. Equipment with a fair market value of $7.3 million was traded (along with $800,000 of cash)
for new equipment worth $8.1 million. The provision for bad debts was $0 and $75,000 in the second
quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Net interest and other (income) expense was zero in the second quarter of 2011 versus $94,000 of
expense in the second quarter of 2010. Income taxes were accrued at an effective rate of 35.0% in
the second quarter of 2011, versus an effective rate of 36.2% in the second quarter of 2010,
commensurate with the Companys estimated liabilities.
As a result of the foregoing factors, the Companys net income increased to $9.5 million in the
second quarter of 2011 from $8.1 million in the second quarter of 2010.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Net sales for the first six months of 2011 were $612.8 million compared with net sales of $411.3
million for the first half of 2010. This dollar increase was the result of a 31.5% increase in the
average price of wire sold and a 13.4% increase in the unit volume of wire sold, measured in pounds
of copper contained in the wire. The average cost per pound of raw copper purchased increased
31.9% in the first six months of 2011 compared to the first six months of 2010, but increased less
than the selling price of wire per copper pound did in dollar terms. In comparing the first half
of 2011 to the first half of 2010, the average sales price of wire that contained a pound of copper
increased more than the average price of copper purchased during the period. Margins expanded as
the spread between the price of wire sold and the cost of raw copper purchased increased by 30.4%,
due primarily to industry pricing discipline. Fluctuations in sales prices are primarily a result
of changing copper raw material prices and product price competition.
Cost of goods sold increased to $548.4 million in the first six months of 2011, compared to $373.8
million in the first six months of 2010. Gross profit increased to $64.4 million,
11
or 10.5% of net sales, in the first six months of 2011 versus $37.5 million, or 9.1% of net sales,
in the first six months of 2010. The increased gross profit dollars were primarily the result of
the 49.0% increase in net sales dollars and the increased copper spreads in the first six months of
2011 versus the same period in 2010 as discussed above.
As a result of decreasing copper costs in the second quarter offset slightly by a small increase in
the amount of inventory on hand during the first six months of 2011, a LIFO adjustment was recorded
increasing cost of sales by $1.4 million during the six month period. Based on the current copper
prices, there is no LCM adjustment necessary. Future reductions in the price of copper could
require the Company to record an LCM adjustment against the related inventory balance, which would
result in a negative impact on net income.
Selling expenses for the first six months of 2011 increased to $24.3 million, or 4.0% of net sales,
compared to $17.7 million, or 4.3% of net sales, in the same period of 2010. Commissions paid to
independent manufacturers representatives are calculated as a percentage of sales, and therefore,
rose $4.7 million in concert with the increased sales dollars. Freight costs increased $1.9
million due to the increase in unit sales and other factors noted in the quarterly analysis above,
but declined as a percentage of net sales due to the large net sales dollar increase. Commissions
were 2.5% and 2.6% in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. General and
administrative expenses increased to $10.0 million, or 1.6% of net sales, in the first six months
of 2011 compared to $8.2 million, or 2.0% of net sales, in the same period of 2010. The general
and administrative costs rose primarily due to increased legal and administrative costs, while
decreasing slightly as a percentage of net sales. The provision for bad debts was zero and
$150,000 in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Net interest and other expense (income) was $5,000 of income in the first six months of 2011
compared to a $2.8 million expense in the first half of 2010, due primarily to a $2.6 million
one-time charge associated with the early retirement of the Companys $100 million in long-term
notes payable in the first half of 2010. Income taxes were accrued at an effective rate of 33.3%
in the first six months of 2011 versus 34.6% in the first six months of 2010 consistent with the
Companys estimated liabilities.
As a result of the foregoing factors, the Companys net income increased to $20.1 million in the
first half of 2011 from $5.7 million in the first half of 2010.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company maintains a substantial inventory of finished products to satisfy customers prompt
delivery requirements. As is customary in the industry, the Company provides payment terms to most
of its customers that exceed terms that it receives from its suppliers. Therefore, the Companys
liquidity needs have generally consisted of working capital necessary to finance receivables and
inventory. Capital expenditures have historically been necessary to expand and update the
production capacity of the Companys manufacturing operations. The Company has historically
satisfied its liquidity and capital expenditure needs with cash generated from operations,
borrowings under its various debt arrangements and sales of its common stock. Prior to building
the current substantial cash balance, the Company historically used its revolving credit facility
to manage day to day operating cash needs as required by daily fluctuations in working capital, and
has the facility in place should such a need arise in the future.
12
The Company is party to a Financing Agreement with two banks, Bank of America, N.A., as Agent, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (as amended, the Financing Agreement). The Financing
Agreement extends through August 6, 2013, and provides for maximum borrowings of the lesser of
$150,000,000 or the amount of eligible accounts receivable plus the amount of eligible finished
goods and raw materials, less any reserves established by the banks. The calculated maximum
borrowing amount available at June 30, 2011, as computed under the Financing Agreement, was
$149,660,000. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest, at the Companys option, at either
(1) LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 1.0% to 1.75% depending upon the ratio of debt outstanding
to adjusted earnings or (2) the base rate (which is the higher of the federal funds rate plus 0.5%
or the prime rate) plus 0% to 0.25% (depending upon the ratio of debt outstanding to adjusted
earnings). A commitment fee ranging from 0.20% to 0.375% (depending upon the ratio of debt
outstanding to adjusted earnings) is payable on the unused line of credit. At June 30, 2011, there
were no borrowings outstanding under the Financing Agreement. Obligations under the Financing
Agreement are the only contractual borrowing obligations or commercial borrowing commitments of the
Company.
Obligations under the Financing Agreement are unsecured and contain customary covenants and events
of default. The Company was in compliance with the covenants as of June 30, 2011.
Cash used in operating activities was $50.6 million in the first six months of 2011 compared to
$21.4 million in the first six months of 2010. The following changes in components of cash flow
were notable. The Company had net income of $20.1 million in the first six months of 2011 versus
net income of $5.7 million in the first six months of 2010. Accounts receivable increased in the
first six months of 2011 and 2010, resulting in a $56.4 million and a $49.3 million use of cash,
respectively. Accounts receivable increased in concert with the increased dollar sales in both
years versus the prior years. Inventory increased in 2011, resulting in a $13.1 million use of
cash, while inventory decreased in 2010, which provided a
$2.6 million source of cash. This resulted in an overall
decrease in cash provided of $15.7 million. Trade accounts
payable and accrued liabilities resulted in a $10.7 million decrease in cash provided in the first
half of 2011 versus the first half of 2010 due primarily to the decrease in accounts payable,
attributable primarily to the timing of inventory receipts at quarter end. These changes in cash
flow were the primary drivers of the $29.2 million decrease in cash flow from operations in the
first half of 2011 versus the first half of 2010.
Cash used in investing activities decreased to $5.5 million in the first six months of 2011 from
$11.2 million in the first six months of 2010. The funds were used primarily for equipment
purchases in both years. The Company used $0.3 million of cash in financing activities in the
first six months of 2011 versus the $103.7 million of cash used in the first six months of 2010.
The large amount of cash used in 2010 was primarily the result of the Companys early retirement of
long-term notes payable. In the first half of 2011, the Companys revolving line of credit
remained at $0. The Companys cash balance was $46.8 million at June 30, 2011.
During the remainder of 2011, the Company expects its capital expenditures will consist primarily
of purchases of additional plant and equipment for its building wire operations. The total capital
expenditures for all of 2011 associated with these projects are currently estimated to be between
$16 million and $18 million. The Company will continue to
13
manage its working capital requirements. These requirements may increase as a result of increased
sales and may be impacted by the price of copper. The Company believes that the current cash
balance, cash flow from operations, and the financing available under the Financing Agreement will
satisfy working capital and capital expenditure requirements during 2011.
Information Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements (within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and information that are based on managements belief as well as
assumptions made by and information currently available to management. The words believes,
estimates, anticipates, plans, seeks, expects, intends and similar expressions identify
some of the forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such
expectations will prove to have been correct. Such statements are subject to certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those
expected. Among the key factors that may have a direct bearing on the Companys operating results
are fluctuations in the economy and in the level of activity in the building and construction
industry, demand for the Companys products, the impact of price competition and fluctuations in
the price of copper. For more information regarding forward looking statements see Information
Regarding Forward Looking Statements in Part II, Item 7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
There have been no material changes from the information provided in Item 7A, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by it in the reports it files with or submits to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in
such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Based on an evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report conducted by the Companys management,
with the participation of the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, the Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officers concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it
files with or submits to the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the
14
Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting or in other
factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal
control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
Please refer to Note 8 Contingencies in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for information on legal proceedings.
There have been no material changes to the Companys risk factors as disclosed in Item 1A, Risk
Factors, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
On November 10, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program authorizing the
Company to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through December 31, 2007 on the
open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prices determined by the President of
the Company. The Companys Board of Directors has subsequently authorized annual extensions of
this stock repurchase program through March 31, 2012 and has authorized the repurchase of up to
2,610,000 shares of its common stock. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its stock in
the first six months of 2011 or 2010.
The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this
Form 10-Q.
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENCORE WIRE CORPORATION |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 4, 2011 |
/s/ DANIEL L. JONES
|
|
|
Daniel L. Jones, President and |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 4, 2011 |
/s/ FRANK J. BILBAN
|
|
|
Frank J. Bilban, |
|
|
Vice President Finance,
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary |
|
16
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Encore Wire Corporation and all
amendments thereto (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Encore Wire Corporation, as
amended through December 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Daniel L. Jones, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, dated August 4, 2011 and submitted
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) and pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Frank J. Bilban, Vice President Finance,
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
dated August 4, 2011 and submitted pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) and pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification by Daniel L. Jones, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, dated August 4, 2011 as required by 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification by Frank J. Bilban, Vice President Finance,
Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, dated August 4,
2011 as required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |