e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007
0-23494
(Commission File no.)
Brightpoint, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Indiana
|
|
35-1778566 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
2601 METROPOLIS PARKWAY, SUITE 210, PLAINFIELD, INDIANA 46168
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (317) 707-2355
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 Par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (NASDAQ Global Select Market) |
Preferred Share Purchase Rights |
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates as of June 29,
2007, which was the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter was $679,142,386.
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 20, 2008: 81,597,844
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the registrants proxy statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders
to be held in 2008, are incorporated by reference in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of
this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business.
General
Brightpoint, Inc. is a global leader in the distribution of wireless devices and accessories and
provision of customized logistic services to the wireless industry. We have operations centers
and/or sales offices in various countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Colombia, Denmark,
Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Philippines,
Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates
and the United States. We provide customized integrated logistic services including procurement,
inventory management, software loading, kitting and customized packaging, fulfillment, credit
services and receivables management, call center and activation services, website hosting,
e-fulfillment solutions and other services within the global wireless industry. Our customers
include mobile network operators, mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs), resellers, retailers
and wireless equipment manufacturers. We distribute wireless communication devices and we provide
value-added distribution and logistic services for wireless products manufactured by companies such
as High Tech Computer Corp., Kyocera, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, Siemens, Sony
Ericsson and UTStarcom.
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana in August 1989 under the name Wholesale
Cellular USA, Inc. and reincorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in March 1994. In
September 1995, we changed our name to Brightpoint, Inc. In June 2004, we reincorporated under the
laws of the State of Indiana under the name of Brightpoint, Inc.
Our website is www.brightpoint.com. We make available, free of charge, at this website our Code of
Business Conduct, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on
Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). The information on the website listed above is not and should not be considered
part of this annual report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated by reference in this document.
In addition, we will provide, at no cost, paper or electronic copies of our reports and other
filings made with the SEC. Requests for such filings should be directed to Investor Relations,
Brightpoint, Inc., 2601 Metropolis Parkway, Suite 210, Plainfield, Indiana 46168, telephone number:
(877) 447-2355.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Brightpoint, Company, we, our and us
means Brightpoint, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Financial Overview and Recent Developments
|
|
|
Dangaard Telecom Acquisition. On July 31, 2007, we completed the acquisition of all of
the issued and outstanding capital stock of Dangaard Telecom A/S, a Danish company
(Dangaard Telecom) from Dangaard Holding A/S, a Danish company for a purchase price of (i)
$100,000 in cash and (ii) 30,000,000 shares of the Companys unregistered Common Stock,
$0.01 par value (including 3,000,000 shares held in escrow). In addition, we assumed
approximately $348.7 million of Dangaard Telecoms indebtedness. The acquisition of
Dangaard Telecom expands our existing European operations. Dangaard Telecom was the leading
distributor of wireless devices and accessories in Europe. Results of operations for
Dangaard Telecom are included in our consolidated results of operations beginning on August
1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Significant Industry Developments. In November, AT&T Inc. acquired Dobson Communications
Corporation (Dobson). Dobson is a significant product distribution and logistic services
customer of our North America operations. On July 30, 2007, Verizon Wireless announced that
it will acquire Rural Cellular Corporation (RCC). RCC is a distribution customer of our
North America operations. The Verizon/RCC acquisition is expected to be completed in the
first half of 2008. On September 17, 2007, T-Mobile USA, Inc. announced that it will
acquire SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (SunCom). SunCom is a significant product
distribution and logistic services customer of our North America operations. This
acquisition is expected to close in the first quarter of 2008. These customers were also
customers of the operations acquired from CellStar. The acquisition of Dobson by AT&T and
the potential acquisitions of RCC by Verizon and of SunCom by T-Mobile may negatively
impact our operating results. Our North America operations are undertaking significant cost
cutting efforts which included consolidating the CellStar operations previously performed
in the Coppell, Texas facility into our other North America operations.
|
2
|
|
|
Savings associated
with this facility consolidation and other cost cutting efforts are intended to help
mitigate some
of the negative impact from AT&Ts acquisition of Dobson, Verizons pending acquisition of
RCC and T-Mobiles pending acquisition of SunCom. However, there can be no assurance that we
will be successful in achieving sufficient cost savings to mitigate any negative impacts. |
|
|
|
|
CellStar Corporation Acquisition. On March 30, 2007, we completed the acquisition of
certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities related to the U.S. operations and
the Miami-based Latin America business of CellStar Corporation for $67.5 million (including
direct acquisition costs). Results of operations related to this acquisition are included
in our Consolidated Statement of Operations beginning April 1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
New Global Credit Facility. On February 16, 2007, we entered into a credit agreement
(the Credit Agreement), by and among us, Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead
arranger and book manager, General Electric Capital Corporation, as syndication agent, ABN
AMRO Bank N.V., as documentation agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as documentation agent,
Bank of America, N.A., as administration agent and the other lenders party thereto. The
Credit Agreement established a five year senior secured revolving credit facility with a
line of credit in the initial amount of $165.0 million. The Credit Agreement contained an
uncommitted accordion facility pursuant to which we were able to increase the total
commitment under the revolving credit facility to $240.0 million. On March 30, 2007, we
entered into a Commitment Increase Agreement with the Guarantors, the Administrative Agent
and the Lenders to increase the total commitment under the revolving credit facility to
$240.0 million. The Credit Agreement replaced our $70.0 million North American asset based
credit facility under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 18, 2004,
as amended, and the $50.0 million Australian Dollar (approximately $39.0 million U.S.
Dollars) asset based credit facility in Australia under the credit agreement dated December
24, 2002, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Credit Facility. On July 31, 2007, we entered into the First Amendment to
the Credit Agreement, which, among other things, resulted in: (i) an increase in the amount
available for borrowing under the secured revolving credit facility from $240.0 million to
$300.0 million, (ii) the extension to the domestic borrowers of a term loan in an original
principal amount of $125.0 million, (iii) the extension to the foreign borrowers, including
one of the Dangaard companies, of a term loan in an original principal amount equivalent to
$125.0 million (denominated in Euros), (iv) the addition to the Credit Agreement of two
Dangaard companies as foreign borrowers and five other Dangaard companies as foreign
guarantors, and (v) increased commitments, in certain cases, from existing members of the
bank group, and new commitments from other lenders who became new members of the bank group
upon the closing of the First Amendment. |
Global Wireless Industry
The global wireless industrys primary purpose is to provide mobile voice and data connectivity to
subscribers. To enable this capability for the subscriber, the global wireless industry is
generally organized as follows:
|
|
|
Mobile network operators: build and operate wireless networks and provide voice and data
access services to subscribers. MVNOs resell voice and data access services, or airtime,
from other mobile operators and do not directly build and operate their own wireless
networks. |
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure designers, manufacturers, builders, and operators: companies who operate
in this segment provide mobile operators with technology, equipment, and cell sites to host
and operate the networks. |
|
|
|
|
Component designers and manufacturers: design technology and components that are embedded
within a wireless device. Components include semiconductor chip sets, displays, antennae and
others. |
|
|
|
|
Content providers: develop mobile content for use with wireless devices and provide
consumers with content such as ring tones, messaging, music, streaming video and television,
games and other applications. |
|
|
|
|
Wireless device manufacturers: design, manufacture, and market wireless devices, such as
cellular phones, wireless personal digital assistants, smart-phones and pagers, which
connect subscribers to a wireless network. |
|
|
|
|
Distributors, retailers and resellers: distributors provide logistic and distribution
services to physically move wireless devices and related products from manufacturers or
mobile operators closer to, or directly into, the hands of mobile subscribers; retailers,
value-added resellers and system integrators provide subscribers and potential subscribers
with an access point, either physical or on-line, to purchase a subscription and/or a
wireless device. |
3
Wireless voice and data services are available to consumers and businesses over regional, national
and multi-national networks through mobile operators who utilize digital and analog technological
standards, such as:
|
|
|
Generation |
|
Technology Standards |
1G Analog
|
|
AMPS |
2G Digital
|
|
TDMA, CDMA, GSM, iDEN |
2.5G Digital
|
|
GPRS, EDGE, CDMA 1xRTT |
3G Digital
|
|
W-CDMA/UMTS, CDMA 1xEV-DO, HSDPA |
Developments within the global wireless industry have allowed wireless subscribers to talk, send
text messages, send and receive email, capture and transmit digital images and video recordings
(multimedia messages), play games, browse the Internet and watch television using their wireless
devices. Wireless devices and services are also being used for monitoring services, point-of-sale
transaction processing, machine-to-machine communications, local area networks, location
monitoring, sales force automation and customer relationship management.
From 2006 to 2007, the estimated number of worldwide wireless subscribers increased by
approximately 500 million to over 3.1 billion. At the end of 2007, wireless penetration was
estimated to be approximately 50% of the worlds population. During 2007, shipments of wireless
devices in the global wireless industry increased by approximately 18% to an estimated 1.2 billion
wireless devices. Worldwide wireless device shipments are currently forecasted to be approximately
1.3 to 1.4 billion devices in 2008. The percentage of replacement wireless device shipments has
grown and replacement remains the single biggest factor driving global wireless device sell-in
demand. Additionally, the use of wireless data products, including interactive pagers, personal
digital assistants and other mobile computing devices, has seen recent growth and wider consumer
acceptance. The convergence of telecommunications, computing and media is further accelerating the
replacement cycle and driving demand. The industry data contained in this paragraph and elsewhere
in this subsection is based on Company and industry analyst estimates.
We believe the following major trends are taking place within the global wireless industry,
although there are no assurances that we will benefit from these trends (refer to Item 1A, Risk
Factors):
Replacement Devices. As overall subscriber penetration increases in many markets, growth in
wireless device volume is more dependent on the replacement of wireless devices by existing
subscribers. During 2007, approximately 750 million wireless devices sold were replacement devices.
In 2008, it is estimated that replacement device shipments could represent as much as 70% of total
wireless device shipments. We believe that the key drivers for the growth in volume of replacement
devices shipped will be the migration to next generation systems and devices (2.5G and 3G) with
streaming video and television, and increasing penetration of converged devices. Mobile data
(mobile music, mobile TV, mobile banking, mobile advertising, and mobile social networking) and the
availability of compelling content and enhanced device capabilities will continue to drive the
replacement cycle. We expect converged devices to be 15%-20% of the total wireless devices shipped
in 2008. While the new features, enhanced functionalities, converged and 3G devices and migration
to next generation systems are anticipated to increase both replacement device shipments and total
wireless device shipments, general economic conditions, consumer acceptance, component shortages,
manufacturing difficulties, supply constraints and other factors could negatively impact
anticipated wireless device shipments.
Increasing Subscribers. We expect the number of subscribers worldwide to continue to increase.
Greater economic growth, increased wireless service availability or lower cost of wireless service
compared to conventional fixed line systems and reductions in the cost of wireless devices may
result in an increase in subscribers. In particular, markets or regions such as Africa, India,
Latin America, China and Eastern Europe are expected to increase their number of subscribers
significantly. Increasing deregulation, the availability of additional spectrum, increased
competition and the emergence of new wireless technologies and related applications may further
increase the number of subscribers in markets that have historically had high penetration rates.
More mobile operators may offer services including seamless roaming, increased coverage, improved
signal quality and greater data handling capabilities through increased bandwidth, thereby
attracting more subscribers to mobile operators which offer such services.
Next Generation Systems. In order to provide a compelling service offering for their current and
prospective subscribers, mobile operators continue to expand and enhance their systems by migrating
to next generation systems such as 2.5G and 3G. These next generation systems allow subscribers to
send and receive email, capture and transmit digital images and video
4
recordings (multimedia
messages), play games, browse the Internet, watch television and take advantage of services such as
monitoring services, point-of-sale transaction processing, machine-to-machine communications,
location monitoring, sales force automation and customer relationship management. In order to
realize the full advantage of these services and capabilities, many current subscribers will need
to replace their wireless devices. As a result, the continued rollout of next generation systems is
expected to be a key driver for replacement sales of wireless devices. However, the ability and
timing of mobile operators to rollout these new services and manufacturers to provide devices which
utilize these technologies may have a significant impact on consumer adoption and the rate of sale
of replacement devices.
New or Expanding Industry Participants. With the opportunities presented by enhanced voice and
data capabilities and an expanding market for wireless devices, many companies are entering or
expanding their presence in the global wireless industry. For example, many companies have
announced their intentions to create MVNOs in order to leverage their content and brands in the
wireless space. In addition, companies such as Microsoft (wireless device operating systems
provider) and High Tech Computer Corp. (wireless device manufacturer) are bringing feature-rich
operating systems or wireless devices to market in order to provide subscribers with capabilities
that emulate their desktop computer. Furthermore, in January 2007, Apple introduced its iPhone,
which is a combination of a mobile phone, a widescreen iPod and a wireless internet communication
device. While we do not participate in the direct distribution of the iPhone, High Tech Computer
Corp., Microsoft, and Apple and their products may heighten competition with other existing
manufacturers and provide consumers with more feature-rich products, broader selection and new
market channels, which may result in increased wireless device shipments.
Pricing Factors and Average Selling Prices. Industry estimates are that in 2007 the global
wireless industrys average selling price for wireless devices remained flat or declined slightly
from 2006. A number of factors impacted the actual average selling prices including, but not
limited to, geographic mix, shortening of the product life cycle, decreasing manufacturing costs
due to higher volumes, manufacturing efficiencies, reductions in material costs, consumer demand,
manufacturers promotional activities, operators promotional activity and trends in pricing for
service plans, product availability, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, product mix and
device functionality. We anticipate that the global wireless industrys average selling prices for
wireless devices will continue to decline despite the fact that manufacturers have been adding
enhanced features; however, no assurance can be given regarding the rate of such decline. The
decline in average selling prices could offset any growth in revenue from overall growth in
wireless device shipments and have an adverse impact on both the industrys and our distribution
revenues. However, changes in average selling prices of wireless devices have little to no impact
on our revenue from logistic services, which are fee-based services.
Our Business
Our primary business is moving wireless devices closer to, or directly into, the hands of mobile
subscribers. With approximately 83 million wireless devices handled in 2007, we are the largest
dedicated distributor of wireless devices and provider of customized logistic services to mobile
operators, MVNOs, resellers, retailers and wireless equipment manufacturers. Our business includes
product distribution, logistic services, activation services and the sale of prepaid airtime. The
majority of our business is conducted through product distribution and logistic services. While our
activation services and prepaid airtime businesses are important to us, they are less significant
than our other businesses in terms of revenue and units handled.
Product Distribution. In our product distribution activities, we purchase a wide variety of
wireless voice and data products from leading manufacturers. We take ownership of the products and
receive them in our facilities or have them drop-shipped directly to our customers. We actively
market and sell these products to our worldwide customer base of approximately 25,000 customers.
Product distribution revenue includes the value of the product sold and generates higher revenue
per unit, as compared to our logistic services revenue, which does not include the value of the
product. We frequently review and evaluate wireless voice and data products in determining the mix
of products purchased for distribution and attempt to acquire distribution rights for those
products that we believe have the potential for enhanced financial return and significant market
penetration. In 2007, 2006 and 2005 approximately 92%, 86%, and 86% of our total revenue was
derived from product distribution. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, approximately 31%, 24% and 28%, of our
total wireless devices handled were sold through product distribution. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, our
gross margin on product distribution revenue was 4.2%, 3.9% and 3.9%. Cost of revenue for product
distribution includes the costs of the products sold and other direct costs such as freight, labor
and rent expense.
The wireless devices we distribute include a variety of devices designed to work on various
operating platforms and feature brand names such as High Tech Computer Corp., Kyocera, LG
Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, Siemens, Sony
5
Ericsson and UTStarcom. In 2007, 2006 and
2005, our sales of wireless devices through product distribution totaled 25.7
million, 12.8 million and 11.8 million devices. As the industrys average selling prices have
continued to decline, our average selling prices have also decreased due to the mix of wireless
devices we sell and the markets in which we operate. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, our average selling
price for wireless devices was approximately $143, $153, and $147 per unit. Our average selling
price increased to approximately $156 in the fourth quarter of 2007 primarily due to the addition of the
operations of Dangaard Telecom. However, because average selling price is dependent on the mix of
wireless devices we sell and the markets in which we operate, there can be no assurance that
average selling prices will remain consistent with the fourth quarter of 2007.
We also distribute accessories used in connection with wireless devices, such as batteries,
chargers, memory cards, car-kits, cases and hands-free products. We purchase and resell original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) and aftermarket accessories, either prepackaged or in bulk. Our
accessory packaging services provide mobile operators and retail chains with custom packaged and/or
branded accessories based on the specific requirements of those customers.
Logistic Services. Our logistic services include procurement, inventory management, software
loading, kitting and customized packaging, fulfillment, credit services and receivables management,
call center and activation services, website hosting, e-fulfillment solutions and other services.
Generally, logistic services are fee-based services. In many of our markets, we have contracts with
mobile operators and wireless equipment manufacturers to which we provide our logistic services.
These customers include, but are not limited to, operating companies or subsidiaries of ALLTEL
(United States), COMCEL (Colombia), Cricket Communications (United States), Debitel (Denmark,
France, and Germany), Euroset (Finland), MetroPCS (United States), Motorola (United States), P4
(Poland), Sprint Nextel (United States), T-Mobile (United States), T-Mobile Slovensko (Slovakia),
TracFone (United States), Virgin Mobile (United States) and Vodafone (Australia and New Zealand).
During 2007, 2006 and 2005, logistic services accounted for approximately 8%, 14% and 14% of our
total revenue and accounted for approximately 69%, 76% and 72% of the total wireless devices we
handled. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, our logistic services gross margin was 28.9%, 21.1% and 20.6%.
Cost of revenue for logistic services is primarily composed of costs such as freight, labor and
rent expense. Since we generally do not take ownership of the inventory in our logistic services
arrangements and the accounts receivable are lower due to the fee-based nature of these services,
the invested capital requirements and the risks assumed in providing logistic services generally
are significantly lower than our distribution business.
Activation Services. In our activation services business, we provide a cost-effective channel for
mobile operators and MVNOs to add new subscribers. We do this by establishing and managing a
network of independent authorized retailers (referred to as the Accesspoint Dealer Network). We
provide our Accesspoint Dealer Network with access to products and support them through commissions
management, sales and marketing programs, merchandising programs, training programs, incentive
programs and cooperative advertising. As these retailers activate or upgrade subscribers, they earn
commissions from mobile operators. We collect these commissions from the mobile operators and pay
the retailers their pro-rata portion of the commissions after deducting our fees. For mobile
operators and MVNOs, we provide them with incremental points of sale, a variable-cost model for
acquiring new subscribers and commissions management for our Accesspoint Dealer Network. Sales of
wireless devices and related accessories to our network of independent authorized retailers are
included in product distribution revenues and fees earned from commissions management services are
included in logistic services revenues. We currently provide activation services in the United
States to mobile operators such as Boost Mobile, Sprint Nextel and Virgin Mobile.
Prepaid Airtime. Through our prepaid airtime business model, we participate in the ongoing revenue
stream generated by prepaid subscribers. We do this by purchasing physical scratch cards or
electronic activation codes from mobile operators and MVNOs and distributing them to retail
channels. Much of our activity in the prepaid airtime business model is in our Europe and Americas
Divisions. Sales of physical scratch cards or electronic activation codes to retail customers are
included in logistic services revenues. We distribute prepaid airtime in many of our operations on
behalf of mobile operators and MVNOs such as: Virgin Mobile (United States), Sonofon (Denmark),
Tele2 (Sweden) and TeliaSonera (Sweden).
Our Strategy
Our strategy is to continue to grow as a leader in product distribution and logistic services in
the global wireless industry. Our objectives are to increase our earnings and market share, improve
our return on invested capital within certain debt-to-total-capital parameters and to enhance
customer satisfaction by increasing the value we offer relative to other service alternatives and
service offerings by our competitors.
6
Our strategy incorporates industry trends such as increasing sales of replacement devices,
increasing subscribers, the migration to next generation systems and new or expanding industry
participants as described in detail in the section entitled Global Wireless Industry. We will
endeavor to grow our business through organic growth opportunities, new product and service
offerings, start-up operations and joint ventures or acquisitions. In evaluating opportunities for
growth, key components of our decision making process include anticipated long-term rates of
return, short-term returns on invested capital and risk profiles as compared to the potential
returns. No assurances can be given on the success of our strategy, and we reference Item 1A, Risk
Factors.
Key elements of our strategy include:
Expand into New Geographic Markets. We estimate that the global wireless industry shipped
approximately 1.2 billion wireless devices in 2007. We believe that the wireless devices shipped in
the geographic markets where we currently operate (our addressable market) were less than one-third
of the global industry shipments of devices in 2007. We believe we are in a position to enter into
new markets, thereby expanding our addressable market. In 2008, we believe that there may be
additional expansion opportunities primarily in Latin America, Africa, and Asia.
Add New Products and Services in Current Markets. Our strategy includes the search for new
products and new service offerings within the current geographic markets in which we operate. With
increasing functionality of wireless devices resulting from technological advancements and enhanced
data speeds due to the migration to next generation systems, we believe that device manufacturers
will introduce new innovative products, which we may distribute. Potential new product categories
include wireless broadband; mobile media and applications including ring tones, images, games and
music; and smart device enterprise solutions providing bundled wireless solutions to small and
medium enterprise customers through the value-added resellers and system integrator channels.
Expand Existing Product and Service Offerings in Current Markets. Our plan includes the transfer
of our industry know-how, relationships, and capabilities from one market to another in an effort
to expand our product and service offerings within our current markets. This is intended to enhance
the service offerings and product lines of some of our operations, which have relatively limited
product lines and service offerings as compared to the collective product and service offerings of
the entire Company. Opportunities in expanding our product lines include wireless handsets, data
devices, memory cards, sim-cards and accessories. Opportunities in expanding our service offerings
include product fulfillment, electronic prepaid recharge services, reverse logistics management,
repair services, and activation services.
Continue to Build and Promote the Brightpoint Brand within the Global Wireless Industry. Many of
our customers and suppliers operate in multiple markets globally. We believe that strengthening our
corporate brand and delivering a consistent message globally may allow us to compete for business
more effectively than local unbranded distribution companies or logistic services providers who are
not solely dedicated to serving the global wireless industry. We have developed distribution and
logistics expertise that is unique to the global wireless industry and, with a solid brand, plan on
pursuing opportunities to further grow our business.
Customers
We provide our products and services to a customer base of approximately 25,000 consisting of
mobile operators, MVNOs, manufacturers, independent agents and dealers, retailers, and other
distributors. During 2007, customers in each of our primary sales channels include the following:
Mobile Operators and MVNOs: ALLTEL (United States), Dobson Cellular (United States), IDT (United
States), MetroPCS (United States), Sprint Nextel (United States), T-Mobile (United States),
TracFone (United States), Virgin Mobile (United States), COMCEL (Colombia), SingTel (Australia),
Telstra (Australia), Vodafone (Australia, New Zealand and Germany), Reliance Infocomm (India),
Tata TeleServices (India), Debitel AG (Europe), Telecom Italia (Italy), Netcom (Norway), Tele2
(Sweden) and T-Mobile Slovensko (Slovakia)
Dealers and Agents: Moorehead Communications (United States), One Stop (United States), Wireless
One (United States), Fone Zone (Australia), First Mobile Group (New Zealand), MV2 Telecoms Shop
(Philippines), Dialect (Sweden) and Klartsvar (Sweden)
7
Mass Retailers: Best Buy (United States), Target (United States), Strathfield (Australia),
Woolworths Group (Australia), Metro Group (Europe), and Pressbyran (Sweden)
Other Distributors: Strax (United States), Wireless Channels (United States), Generation Next
Group (formerly Computech) (Hong Kong and Singapore), Raduga Pte. Ltd (Singapore) and Excel
International Limited (Hong Kong)
Significant Industry Developments. In November, AT&T Inc acquired Dobson. Dobson is a significant
product distribution and logistic services customer of our North America operations. On July 30,
2007, Verizon Wireless announced that it will acquire RCC. RCC is a distribution customer of our
North America operations. The Verizon/RCC acquisition is expected to be completed in the first half
of 2008. On September 17, 2007, T-Mobile USA, Inc. announced that it will acquire SunCom. SunCom is
a significant product distribution and logistic services customer of our North America operations.
This acquisition is expected to close in the first half of 2008. These customers were also
customers of the operations acquired from CellStar. The acquisition of Dobson by AT&T and the
potential acquisitions of RCC by Verizon and of SunCom by T-Mobile may negatively impact our
operating results. Our North America operations are undertaking significant cost cutting efforts
which included consolidating the CellStar operations previously performed in the Coppell, Texas
facility into our other North America operations. Savings associated with this facility
consolidation and other cost cutting efforts are intended to help mitigate some of the negative
impact from AT&Ts acquisition of Dobson, Verizons pending acquisition of RCC and T-Mobiles
pending acquisition of SunCom. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in
achieving sufficient cost savings to entirely mitigate any negative impacts.
For 2007, 2006 and 2005, aggregate revenues generated from our five largest customers accounted for
approximately 23%, 26% and 26% of our total revenue. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, Generation Next Group,
a customer of our Singapore operations (2007) and our Brightpoint Asia Limited operations (2006 and
2005), accounted for approximately 10%, 13% and 12% of our total revenue and 29%, 29% and 23% of
the Asia-Pacific divisions revenue. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there were no amounts owed to
us from Generation Next. See Item 1A, Risk Factors THE LOSS OR REDUCTION IN ORDERS FROM
PRINCIPAL CUSTOMERS OR A REDUCTION IN PRICES WE ARE ABLE TO CHARGE THESE CUSTOMERS COULD MATERIALLY
ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.
We generally sell our products pursuant to customer purchase orders and subject to our terms and
conditions. We generally ship products on the same day orders are received from the customer.
Unless otherwise requested, substantially all of our products are delivered by common freight
carriers. Because orders are filled shortly after receipt, backlog is generally not material to our
business. Our logistic services are typically provided pursuant to agreements with terms between
one and three years which generally may be terminated by either party subject to a short notice
period.
Purchasing and Suppliers
We have established key relationships with leading manufacturers of wireless voice and data
equipment such as High Tech Computer Corp., Kyocera, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung,
Siemens, Sony Ericsson and UTStarcom. We generally negotiate directly with manufacturers and
suppliers in order to obtain inventories of brand name products. Inventory purchases are based on
customer demand, product availability, brand name recognition, price, service, and quality. Certain
of our suppliers may provide favorable purchasing terms to us, including credit, price protection,
cooperative advertising, volume incentive rebates, stock balancing and marketing allowances.
Product manufacturers typically provide limited warranties directly to the end consumer or to us,
which we generally pass through to our customers. In certain limited circumstances, we provide
warranties directly to the end customer.
Revenue from the sale of Nokia (our largest supplier of wireless devices and accessories) products
represented approximately 38%, 47% and 52% of total revenue in 2007, 2006 and 2005. Revenue from
the sale of Motorola products represented 16% of total revenue in 2007, and less than 10% of total
revenue in 2006 and 2005. None of the products we sold from our other suppliers accounted for 10%
or more of our total revenue in 2007, 2006 or 2005. Loss of the applicable contracts with Nokia or
other suppliers, or failure by Nokia or other suppliers to supply competitive products on a timely
basis, at competitive prices and on favorable terms, or at all, may have a material adverse
effect on our revenue and operating margins and our ability to obtain and deliver products on a
timely and competitive basis. See Competition.
We maintain agreements with certain of our significant suppliers, all of which relate to specific
geographic areas. Our agreements may be subject to certain conditions and exceptions including the
retention by manufacturers of certain direct accounts and restrictions regarding our sale of
products supplied by certain other competing manufacturers and to certain mobile operators.
Typically our agreements with suppliers are non-exclusive. Our supply agreements may require us to
satisfy purchase requirements based upon forecasts provided by us, in which a portion of these
forecasts may be binding. Our
8
supply agreements generally can be terminated on short notice by
either party. We purchase products from manufacturers pursuant to purchase orders placed from time
to time in the ordinary course of business. Purchase orders are typically filled,
subject to product availability, and shipped to our designated warehouses by common freight
carriers. We believe that our relationships with our suppliers are generally good. Any failure or
delay by our suppliers in supplying us with products on favorable terms and at competitive prices
may severely diminish our ability to obtain and deliver products to our customers on a timely and
competitive basis. If we lose any of our significant suppliers, or if any supplier imposes
substantial price increases or eliminates favorable terms provided to us and alternative sources of
supply are not readily available, it may have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
Sales and Marketing
We promote our product lines, our capabilities and the benefits of certain of our business models
through advertising in trade publications and attending various international, national and
regional trade shows, as well as through direct mail solicitation, media advertising and
telemarketing activities. Our suppliers and customers use a variety of methods to promote their
products and services directly to consumers, including Internet, print and media advertising.
Our sales and marketing efforts are coordinated in each of our three regional divisions by key
personnel responsible for that particular division. Divisional management devotes a substantial
amount of their time to developing and maintaining relationships with our customers and suppliers.
In addition to managing the overall operations of the divisions, each divisions sales and
operations centers are managed by either general or country managers who report to the appropriate
member of divisional management and are responsible for the daily sales and operations of their
particular location. Each country has sales associates who specialize in or focus on sales of our
products and services to a specific customer or customer category (e.g., mobile operator, MVNOs,
dealers and agents, reseller, retailer, subscriber, etc.). In addition, in many markets we have
dedicated a sales force to manage most of our mobile operator relationships and to promote our
logistic services including our activation services and prepaid airtime business models. Including
support and retail outlet personnel, we had 752 employees involved in sales and marketing at
December 31, 2007, of which 232 are in our Americas division, 348 in our Europe division, and 172
in our Asia-Pacific division.
Seasonality
The operating results of each of our three divisions may be influenced by a number of seasonal
factors in the different countries and markets in which we operate. These factors may cause our
revenue and operating results to fluctuate on a quarterly basis. These fluctuations are a result of
several factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
promotions and subsidies by mobile operators; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of local holidays and other events affecting consumer demand; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction of new products by our suppliers and competitors; |
|
|
|
|
purchasing patterns of customers in different markets; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
product availability and pricing. |
Consumer electronics and retail sales in many geographic markets tend to experience increased
volumes of sales at the end of the calendar year, largely because of gift-giving holidays. This and
other seasonal factors have contributed to increases in our revenue during the fourth quarter in
certain markets. Conversely, we have experienced decreases in demand in the first quarter
subsequent to the higher level of activity in the preceding fourth quarter. Our operating results
may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future. If unanticipated events occur, including
delays in securing adequate inventories of competitive products at times of peak sales or
significant decreases in sales during these periods, it could have a material adverse effect on our
operating results. In addition, as a result of seasonal factors, interim results may not be
indicative of annual results.
9
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive industry and in highly competitive markets and believe that such
competition may intensify in the future. The markets for wireless voice and data products are
characterized by intense price competition and significant price erosion over the lives of
products. We compete principally on the basis of value in terms of price, capability, time, product
knowledge, reliability, customer service and product availability. Our competitors may possess
substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than we do, which may
enable them to withstand substantial price competition, launch new products and implement extensive
advertising and promotional campaigns.
The distribution of wireless devices and the provision of logistic services within the global
wireless industry have, in the past, been characterized by relatively low barriers to entry. Our
ability to continue to compete successfully will be largely dependent on our ability to anticipate
and respond to various competitive and other factors affecting the industry, including new or
changing outsourcing requirements; new information technology requirements; new product
introductions; inconsistent or inadequate supply of product; changes in consumer preferences;
demographic trends; international, national, regional and local economic conditions; and discount
pricing strategies and promotional activities by competitors.
The markets for wireless communications products and integrated services are characterized by
rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards, often resulting in product
obsolescence, short product life cycles and changing competition. Accordingly, our success is
dependent upon our ability to anticipate and identify technological changes in the industry and
successfully adapt our offering of products and services, to satisfy evolving industry and customer
requirements. The wireless device industry is increasingly segmenting its product offering and
introducing products with enhanced functionality that competes with other non-wireless consumer
electronic products. Examples include wireless devices with embedded mega-pixel cameras, which now
compete to a certain extent with non-wireless digital cameras, and wireless devices with MP3
capabilities that compete with non-wireless handheld audio players. These non-wireless consumer
electronic products are distributed through other non-wireless distributors who may become our
competitors as the wireless industry continues to introduce wireless devices with enhanced
functionality. In addition, products that reach the market outside of normal distribution channels,
such as gray market resellers, may also have an adverse impact on our operations.
Our current competition and specific competitors varies by service line and division as follows:
Product Distribution. Our product distribution business competes with broad-based wireless
distributors who carry similar product lines and specialty distributors who may focus on segments
within the wireless industry such as WLAN, Wi-Fi and accessories. To a lesser extent we compete
with information technology distribution companies who offer wireless devices in certain markets.
Manufacturers also sell their products directly to large mobile operators and as mobile operator
customers grow in scale, manufacturers may pose a competitive threat to our business.
For product distribution, specific competitors and the divisions in which they generally compete
with us include Aerovoice (Americas), BrightStar Corporation (Americas and Asia-Pacific),
Infosonics (Americas), Tessco Technologies (Americas), Cellnet Group Ltd. (Asia-Pacific), Axcom
(Europe), 20:20 Logistics (Europe), and Ingram Micro (all divisions).
Logistic Services. Our logistic services business competes with general logistic services
companies who provide logistic services to multiple industries and specialize more in the
warehousing and transportation of finished goods. Manufacturers can also offer fulfillment services
to our customers. Certain mobile operators have their own distribution and logistics infrastructure
which competes with our outsource solutions.
For logistic services, specific competitors and the division in which they generally compete with
us include Aftermarket Technologies Corp. (Americas), CAT Logistics (Americas), PFSweb, Inc.
(Americas), Tessco Technologies (Americas), UPS Logistics (Americas), Avarto Logistics Services
(Europe), and Kuehne + Nagel (Americas and Europe).
During 2007, we acquired 470,000 shares representing 9.1% of the total outstanding shares of common
stock of Tessco Technologies Incorporated (Tessco). We purchased the shares because we believe that
the shares are currently undervalued in the marketplace and represent an attractive investment
opportunity. Depending upon then prevailing market conditions, other investment opportunities
available to us, the availability of shares at prices that would make the purchase of additional
shares desirable and other investment considerations, we may increase our position in Tessco.
Activation Services. Our activation services business competes with other specialists who establish
and manage independent authorized retailers and value-added resellers and with mobile operators who
have the infrastructure necessary to manage their indirect channels.
10
For activation services, specific competitors and the division in which they generally compete with
us include American Wireless (Americas), Cellular Network Communication Group (Americas), QDI
(Americas), Wireless Channels (Americas) and Avenir S.A. (Europe).
Prepaid Airtime. Our prepaid airtime business competes with broad-based wireless distributors who
sell prepaid airtime, specialty distributors who focus on prepaid airtime and companies who
manufacture or distribute electronic in-store terminals capable of delivering prepaid airtime. To a
lesser extent we compete with mobile operators themselves as they distribute prepaid airtime
through their own retail channels.
For prepaid airtime, specific competitors and the divisions in which they generally compete with us
include American Wireless (Americas), InComm (Americas), Alphyra (Europe), and Euronet (Europe).
Information Systems
The success of our operations is largely dependent on the functionality, architecture, performance
and utilization of our information systems. We have, and continue to implement, business
applications that enable us to provide our customers and suppliers with solutions for the
distribution of their products. These solutions include, but are not limited to, e-commerce;
electronic data interchange (EDI); web-based order entry, account management, supply chain
management; warehouse management, serialized inventory tracking, inventory management and
reporting. During 2007, 2006 and 2005, we invested approximately $8.6 million, $9.6 million and
$5.0 million, in our information systems with the focus of increasing the functionality and
flexibility of our systems. In the future, we intend to invest to further develop those solutions
and integrate our internal information systems throughout all of our divisions including the
acquired operations of Dangaard Telecom. At December 31, 2007, there were approximately 235
employees in our information technology departments worldwide.
Employees
As of December 31, 2007, we had 3,269 employees; 1,390 in our Americas division, 672 in our
Asia-Pacific division and 1,207 in our Europe division. Of these employees, nine were in executive
officer positions, 1,824 were engaged in service operations, 752 were in sales and marketing and
684 were in finance and administration (including 235 information technology employees). Our
distribution activities and logistic services are labor-intensive and we utilize temporary
laborers, particularly in our Americas division, due to the seasonal demands of our business. At
December 31, 2007, we had 1,579 temporary laborers; 1,283 in our Americas division, 113 in our
Asia-Pacific division and 183 in our Europe division. Of these temporary laborers, approximately
1,372 were engaged in service operations, 63 were in sales and marketing and 145 were in finance
and administration. Worldwide, none of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining
agreement, except for national collective labor agreements in Finland. We believe that our
relations with our employees are good. See Item 1A, Risk Factors WE ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN
PERSONNEL RELATED ISSUES.
Segment and Geographic Financial Information
Financial information concerning our segments and other geographic financial information is
included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There are many important factors that have affected, and in the future could affect our business,
including the factors discussed below which should be reviewed carefully, in conjunction with the
other information contained in this Form 10-K. Some of these factors are beyond our control and
future trends are difficult to predict. In addition, various statements, discussions and analyses
throughout this Form 10-K are not based on historical fact and contain forward-looking statements.
These statements are also subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed
below, which could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in
any forward-looking statements made by us. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement contained in this Form 10-K and should also be aware that we undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking information contained herein to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this Form 10-K or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events.
11
General risks related to our operations
We buy a significant amount of our products from a limited number of suppliers, and they may not
provide us with competitive products at reasonable prices when we need them in the future. We
purchase wireless devices and accessories that we sell from wireless communications equipment
manufacturers, network operators and distributors. We depend on these suppliers to provide us with
adequate inventories of currently popular brand name products on a timely basis and on favorable
pricing and other terms. Our agreements with our suppliers are generally non-exclusive, require us
to satisfy minimum purchase requirements, can be terminated on short notice and provide for certain
territorial restrictions, as is common in our industry. We generally purchase products pursuant to
purchase orders placed from time to time in the ordinary course of business. In the future, our
suppliers may not offer us competitive products on favorable terms without delays. From time to
time we have been unable to obtain sufficient product supplies from manufacturers in many markets
in which we operate. Any future failure or delay by our suppliers in supplying us with products on
favorable terms would severely diminish our ability to obtain and deliver products to our customers
on a timely and competitive basis. If we lose any of our principal suppliers, or if these suppliers
are unable to fulfill our product needs, or if any principal supplier imposes substantial price
increases and alternative sources of supply are not readily available, this may result in a loss of
customers and cause a decline in our results of operations.
We rely on our suppliers to provide trade credit facilities to adequately fund our on-going
operations and product purchases. Our business is dependent on our ability to obtain adequate
supplies of currently popular product at favorable pricing and on other favorable terms. Our
ability to fund our product purchases is dependent on our principal suppliers providing favorable
payment terms that allow us to maximize the efficiency of our capital usage. The payment terms we
receive from our suppliers is dependent on several factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
pledged cash requirements; |
|
|
|
|
our payment history with the supplier; |
|
|
|
|
the suppliers credit granting policies, contractual provisions; |
|
|
|
|
our overall credit rating as determined by various credit rating agencies; |
|
|
|
|
industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
our recent operating results, financial position and cash flows; and |
|
|
|
|
the suppliers ability to obtain credit insurance on amounts that we owe them. |
Adverse changes in any of these factors, some of which may not be in our control, could harm our
operations.
The loss or reduction in orders from principal customers or a reduction in the prices we are able
to charge these customers could cause our revenues to decline and impair our cash flows. During
the years ended December 31, 2007 2006, and 2005, Generation Next Group accounted for approximately
10%, 13%, and 12% of our total revenue and 29%, 29%, and 23% of our Asia-Pacific divisions
revenue. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there were no amounts owed to us from Generation Next
Group. Many of our customers in the markets we serve have experienced severe price competition and,
for this and other reasons, may seek to obtain products or services from us at lower prices than we
have been able to provide these customers in the past. The loss of any of our principal customers,
a reduction in the amount of product or services our principal customers order from us or our
inability to maintain current terms, including price, with these or other customers could cause our
revenues to decline and impair our cash flows. Although we have entered into contracts with certain
of our largest logistic services customers, we previously have experienced losses of certain of
these customers through expiration or cancellation of our contracts with them, and there can be no
assurance that any of our customers will continue to purchase products or services from us or that
their purchases will be at the same or greater levels than in prior periods.
Our business could be harmed by consolidation of mobile operators. The past several years have
witnessed a consolidation within the mobile operator community, and this trend is expected to
continue. This trend could result in a reduction or elimination of promotional activities by the
remaining mobile operators as they seek to reduce their expenditures, which could, in turn, result
in decreased demand for our products or services. Moreover, consolidation of mobile operators
reduces the number of potential contracts available to us and other providers of logistic services.
We could also lose business if mobile operators that are our customers are acquired by other mobile
operators that are not our customers.
We make significant investments in the technology used in our business and rely on that technology
to function effectively without interruptions. We have made significant investments in information
systems technology and have focused on the application of this technology to provide customized
distribution and logistic services to wireless communications equipment manufacturers
12
and network operators. Our ability to meet our customers technical and performance requirements is
highly dependent on the effective functioning of our information technology systems. Further,
certain of our contractual arrangements to provide services contain performance measures and
criteria that if not met could result in early termination of the agreement and claims for damages.
In connection with the implementation of this technology we have incurred significant costs and
have experienced significant business interruptions. Business interruptions can cause us to fall
below acceptable performance levels pursuant to our customers requirements and could result in the
loss of the related business relationship. We may experience additional costs and periodic business
interruptions related to our information systems as we implement new information systems in our
various operations. Our sales and marketing efforts, a large part of which are telemarketing based,
are highly dependent on computer and telephone equipment. We anticipate that we will need to
continue to invest significant amounts to enhance our information systems in order to maintain our
competitiveness and to develop new logistic services. Our property and business interruption
insurance may not compensate us adequately, or at all, for losses that we may incur if we lose our
equipment or systems either temporarily or permanently. In addition, a significant increase in the
costs of additional technology or telephone services that are not recoverable through an increase
in the price of our services could negatively impact our results of operations.
A substantial number of shares will be eligible for future sale by Dangaard Holding and the sale of
those shares could adversely affect our stock price. We issued 30,000,000 shares of our common
stock (including 3,000,000 shares held in escrow) to Dangaard Holding on July 31, 2007 as partial
consideration for our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement that we entered into with Dangaard Holding upon the closing of the acquisition, we have
granted registration rights to Dangaard Holding with respect to 8,000,000 of such 30,000,000
shares. If a registration statement is filed, all of those 8,000,000 shares will be eligible for
immediate public sale, which could cause a decline in the public market for our common stock if a
significant portion of those shares are offered for resale at any given time. Even without their
registration, Dangaard Holding may have the ability to sell a significant number of shares in the
public market after February 15, 2008 pursuant to Rule 144. We have also granted Dangaard Holding
demand and tag-along registration rights with respect to the other 22,000,000 of its shares
commencing August 1, 2008. Even without their registration, however, Dangaard Holding may have the
ability to sell a significant number of those other 22,000,000 shares in the public market
commencing August 1, 2008 pursuant to Rule 144. Any of such sales could also cause a significant
decline in the market price for our common stock.
We have debt facilities that could prevent us from borrowing additional funds, if needed. Our
global credit facility is secured by primarily all of our domestic assets and other foreign assets
and stock pledges. Our borrowing availability is based primarily on a leverage ratio test, measured
as total funded indebtedness over EBITDA adjusted as defined in the credit agreement. Consequently,
any significant decrease in adjusted EBITDA could limit our ability to borrow additional funds to
adequately finance our operations and expansion strategies. The terms of our global credit facility
also include negative covenants that, among other things, may limit our ability to incur additional
indebtedness, sell certain assets and make certain payments, including but not limited to,
dividends, repurchases of our common stock and other payments outside the normal course of
business, as well as prohibiting us from merging or consolidating with another corporation or
selling all or substantially all of our assets in the United States or assets of any other named
borrower. If we violate any of these loan covenants, default on these obligations or become subject
to a change of control, our indebtedness under the credit agreement would become immediately due
and payable, and the banks could foreclose on its security.
We may have difficulty collecting our accounts receivable. We currently offer and intend to offer
open account terms to certain of our customers, which may subject us to credit risks, particularly
in the event that any receivables represent sales to a limited number of customers or are
concentrated in particular geographic markets. The collection of our accounts receivable and our
ability to accelerate our collection cycle through the sale of accounts receivable is affected by
several factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
our credit granting policies, |
|
|
|
|
contractual provisions, |
|
|
|
|
our customers and our overall credit rating as determined by various credit rating agencies, |
|
|
|
|
industry and economic conditions, |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the customer to provide security, collateral or guarantees relative to credit granted by us, |
|
|
|
|
the customers and our recent operating results, financial position and cash flows; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain credit insurance on amounts that we are owed. |
13
Adverse changes in any of these factors, certain of which may not be wholly in our control, could
create delays in collecting or an inability to collect our accounts receivable which could impair
our cash flows and our financial position and cause a reduction in our results of operations.
Our future operating results will depend on our ability to continue to increase volumes and
maintain margins. A large percentage of our total revenues is derived from sales of wireless
devices, a part of our business that operates on a high-volume, low-margin basis. Our ability to
generate these sales is based upon demand for wireless voice and data products and our having
adequate supply of these products. The gross margins that we realize on sales of wireless devices
could be reduced due to increased competition or a growing industry emphasis on cost containment.
However, a sales mix shift to fee-based logistic services may place negative pressure on our
revenue growth while having a positive impact on our gross margins. Therefore, our future
profitability will depend on our ability to maintain our margins or to increase our sales to help
offset future declines in margins. We may not be able to maintain existing margins for products or
services offered by us or increase our sales. Even if our sales rates do increase, the gross
margins that we receive from our sales may not be sufficient to make our future operations
profitable.
Our business growth strategy includes acquisitions. We have acquired businesses in the past and
plan to continue to do so in the future based on our global business strategy. Prior or future
acquisitions may not meet our expectations at the time of purchase, which could adversely affect
our operations causing operating losses and subsequent write-downs due to asset impairments.
Our business depends on the continued tendency of wireless equipment manufacturers and network
operators to outsource aspects of their business to us in the future. We provide functions such as
distribution, inventory management, fulfillment, customized packaging, prepaid and e-commerce
solutions, activation management and other outsourced services for many wireless manufacturers and
network operators. Certain wireless equipment manufacturers and network operators have elected, and
others may elect, to undertake these services internally. Additionally, our customer service
levels, industry consolidation, competition, deregulation, technological changes or other
developments could reduce the degree to which members of the global wireless industry rely on
outsourced logistic services such as the services we provide. Any significant change in the market
for our outsourced services could harm our business. Our outsourced services are generally provided
under multi-year renewable contractual arrangements. Service periods under certain of our
contractual arrangements are expiring or will expire in the near future. The failure to obtain
renewals or otherwise maintain these agreements on terms, including price, consistent with our
current terms could cause a reduction in our revenues and cash flows.
We depend on third parties to manufacture products that we distribute and, accordingly, rely on
their quality control procedures. Product manufacturers typically provide limited warranties
directly to the end consumer or to us, which we generally pass through to our customers. If a
product we distribute for a manufacturer has quality or performance problems, our ability to
provide products to our customers could be disrupted, causing a delay and/or reduction in our
revenues.
Our operations could be harmed by fluctuations in regional demand patterns and economic factors.
The demand for our products and services has fluctuated and may continue to vary substantially
within the regions served by us. We believe that the enhanced functionality of wireless devices and
the roll-out of next generation systems has had and will continue to have an effect on overall
subscriber growth and handset replacement demand. Economic slow-downs in regions served by us or
changes in promotional programs offered by mobile operators may lower consumer demand and create
higher levels of inventories in our distribution channels which results in lower than anticipated
demand for the products and services that we offer and can decrease our gross and operating
margins. A prolonged economic slow-down in the United States or any other region in which we have
significant operations could negatively impact our results of operations and financial position.
Rapid technological changes in the global wireless industry could render our services or the
products we handle obsolete or less marketable. The technology relating to wireless voice and data
equipment changes rapidly resulting in product obsolescence or short product life cycles. We are
required to anticipate future technological changes in our industry and to continually identify,
obtain and market new products in order to satisfy evolving industry and customer requirements.
Competitors or manufacturers of wireless equipment may market products or services that have
perceived or actual advantages over our service offerings or the products that we handle or render
those products or services obsolete or less marketable. We have made and continue to make
significant working capital investments in accordance with evolving industry and customer
requirements including maintaining levels of inventories of currently popular products that we
believe are necessary based on current market conditions. These concentrations of working capital
increase our risk of loss due to product obsolescence.
14
A significant percentage of our revenues are generated outside of the United States in countries
that may have volatile currencies or other risks. We maintain operations centers and sales offices
in territories and countries outside of the United States. The fact that our business operations
are conducted in many countries exposes us to several additional risks, including, but not limited
to:
|
|
|
increased credit risks, customs duties, import quotas and other trade restrictions; |
|
|
|
|
potentially greater inflationary pressures; |
|
|
|
|
shipping delays; |
|
|
|
|
the risk of failure or material interruption of wireless systems and services; |
|
|
|
|
possible wireless product supply interruption; and |
|
|
|
|
potentially significant increases in wireless product prices. |
In addition, changes to our detriment may occur in social, political, regulatory and economic
conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade and investment in the territories and
countries where we currently have operations. U.S. laws and regulations relating to investment and
trade in foreign countries could also change to our detriment. Any of these factors could have a
negative impact on our business and operations. We purchase and sell products and services in a
number of foreign currencies, many of which have experienced fluctuations in currency exchange
rates. In the past, we entered into forward exchange swaps, futures or options contracts as a means
of hedging our currency transaction and balance sheet translation exposures. However, our
management has had limited prior experience in engaging in these types of transactions. Even if
done well, hedging may not effectively limit our exposure to a decline in operating results due to
foreign currency translation. We cannot predict the effect that future exchange rate fluctuations
will have on our operating results. We have ceased operations or divested several of our foreign
operations because they were not performing to acceptable levels. These actions resulted in
significant losses to us. We may in the future, decide to divest certain existing foreign
operations, which could result in our incurring significant additional losses.
Natural disasters, epidemics, hostilities and terrorist acts could disrupt our operations. Although
we have implemented policies and procedures designed to minimize the effects of natural disasters,
epidemics, outbreak of hostilities or terrorist attacks in markets served by us or on our
facilities, the actual effect of any such events on our operations cannot be determined at this
time. However, we believe any of these events could disrupt our operations and negatively impact
our business.
The global wireless industry is intensely competitive and we may not be able to continue to compete
successfully in this industry. We compete for sales of wireless voice and data equipment, and
expect that we will continue to compete, with numerous well-established mobile operators,
distributors and manufacturers, including our own suppliers. As a provider of logistic services, we
also compete with other distributors, logistic services companies and electronic manufacturing
services companies. Many of our competitors possess greater financial and other resources than we
do and may market similar products or services directly to our customers. The global wireless
industry has generally had low barriers to entry. As a result, additional competitors may choose to
enter our industry in the future. The markets for wireless handsets and accessories are
characterized by intense price competition and significant price erosion over the life of a
product. Many of our competitors have the financial resources to withstand substantial price
competition and to implement extensive advertising and promotional programs, both generally and in
response to efforts by additional competitors to enter into new markets or introduce new products.
Our ability to continue to compete successfully will depend largely on our ability to maintain our
current industry relationships. We may not be successful in anticipating and responding to
competitive factors affecting our industry, including new or changing outsourcing requirements, the
entry of additional well-capitalized competitors, new products which may be introduced, changes in
consumer preferences, demographic trends, international, national, regional and local economic
conditions and competitors discount pricing and promotion strategies. As wireless
telecommunications markets mature and as we seek to enter into new markets and offer new products
in the future, the competition that we face may change and grow more intense.
We may not be able to manage and sustain future growth at our historical or current rates. In prior
years we have experienced domestic and international growth. We will need to manage our expanding
operations effectively, maintain or accelerate our growth as planned and integrate any new
businesses which we may acquire into our operations successfully in order to continue our desired
growth. If we are unable to do so, particularly in instances in which we have made significant
capital investments, it could materially harm our operations. Our inability to absorb, through
revenue growth, the increasing
15
operating costs that we have incurred and continue to incur in connection with our activities and
the execution of our strategy could cause our future earnings to decline. In addition, our growth
prospects could be harmed by a decline in the global wireless industry generally or in one of our
regional divisions, either of which could result in reduction or deferral of expenditures by
prospective customers.
Our business strategy includes entering into relationships and financing that may provide us with
minimal returns or losses on our investments. We have entered into several relationships with
wireless equipment manufacturers, mobile operators and other participants in our industry. We intend to continue to enter into similar relationships as
opportunities arise. We may enter into distribution or logistic services agreements with these
parties and may provide them with equity or debt financing. Our ability to achieve future
profitability through these relationships will depend in part upon the economic viability, success
and motivation of the entities we select as partners and the amount of time and resources that
these partners devote to our alliances. We may receive minimal or no business from these
relationships and joint ventures, and any business we receive may not be significant or at the
level we anticipated. The returns we receive from these relationships, if any, may not offset
possible losses, our investments or the full amount of financings that we make upon entering into
these relationships. We may not achieve acceptable returns on our investments with these parties
within an acceptable period or at all.
Our operating results frequently vary significantly and respond to seasonal fluctuations in
purchasing patterns. The operating results of each of our three divisions may be influenced by a
number of seasonal factors in the different countries and markets in which we operate. These
factors may cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate on a quarterly basis. These
fluctuations are a result of several factors, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
promotions and subsidies by mobile operators; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of local holidays and other events affecting consumer demand; |
|
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction of new products by our suppliers and competitors; |
|
|
|
|
purchasing patterns of customers in different markets; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
product availability and pricing. |
Consumer electronics and retail sales in many geographic markets tend to experience increased
volumes of sales at the end of the calendar year, largely because of gift-giving holidays. This and
other seasonal factors have contributed to increases in our sales during the fourth quarter in
certain markets. Conversely, we have experienced decreases in demand in the first quarter
subsequent to the higher level of activity in the preceding fourth quarter. Our operating results
may continue to fluctuate significantly in the future. If unanticipated events occur, including
delays in securing adequate inventories of competitive products at times of peak sales or
significant decreases in sales during these periods, our operating results could be harmed. In
addition, as a result of seasonal factors, interim results may not be indicative of annual results.
We are subject to certain personnel related issues. Our success depends in large part on the
abilities and continued service of our executive officers and other key employees, including the
executives and other key employees of Dangaard Telecom who joined us as a result of our acquisition
of Dangaard Telecom. Although we have entered into employment agreements with several of our
officers and employees, we may not be able to retain their services. We also have non-competition
agreements with our executive officers and some of our existing key personnel. However, courts are
sometimes reluctant to enforce non-competition agreements. The loss of executive officers or other
key personnel could impede our ability to fully and timely implement our business plan and future
growth strategy. In addition, in order to support our continued growth, we will be required to
effectively recruit, develop and retain additional qualified management. Competition for such
personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully attract,
assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. The failure to retain and attract necessary
personnel could also delay or prevent us from executing our planned growth strategy.
We are subject to a number of regulatory and contractual restrictions governing our relations with
certain of our employees, including national collective labor agreements for certain of our
employees who are employed outside of the United States and individual employer labor agreements.
These arrangements address a number of specific issues affecting our working conditions including
hiring, work time, wages and benefits, and termination of employment. We could be required to make
16
significant payments in order to comply with these requirements. The cost of complying with these
requirements could be material.
Our distribution activities and logistic services are labor-intensive, and we experience high
personnel turnover. In addition, we are from time to time subject to shortages in the available
labor force in certain geographical areas where we operate. A significant portion of our labor
force is contracted through temporary agencies and a significant portion of our costs consists of
wages to hourly workers. Growth in our business, together with seasonal increases in units,
requires us to recruit and train personnel at an accelerated rate from time to time. We may not be
able to continue to hire, train and retain a significant labor force of qualified individuals when
needed, or at all. Our inability to do so, or an increase in hourly costs, employee benefit costs,
employment taxes or commission rates, could cause our operating results to decline. In addition, if
the turnover rate among our labor force increased further, we could be required to increase our
recruiting and training efforts and costs, and our operating efficiencies and productivity could
decrease.
We rely to a great extent on trade secret and copyright laws and agreements with our key employees
and other third parties to protect our proprietary rights. Our business success is substantially
dependent upon our proprietary business methods and software applications relating to our
information systems. We currently hold several patents relating to certain of our business methods.
With respect to other business methods and software we rely on trade secret and copyright laws to
protect our proprietary knowledge. We also regularly enter into non-disclosure agreements with our
key employees and limit access to and distribution of our trade secrets and other proprietary
information. These measures may not prove adequate to prevent misappropriation of our technology.
Our competitors could also independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or
superior to our technology, thereby eliminating one of our competitive advantages. We also have
offices and conduct our operations in a wide variety of countries outside the United States. The
laws of some other countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws
in the United States. In addition, although we believe that our business methods and proprietary
software have been developed independently and do not infringe upon the rights of others, third
parties might assert infringement claims against us in the future or our business methods and
software may be found to infringe upon the proprietary rights of others.
We have significant future payment obligations pursuant to certain leases and other long-term
contracts. We lease our office and warehouse/distribution facilities under real property and
personal equipment leases. Many of these leases are for terms that exceed one year and require us
to pay significant monetary charges for early termination or breach by us of the lease terms. We
cannot be certain of our ability to adequately fund these lease commitments from our future
operations and our decision to modify, change or abandon any of our existing facilities could
negatively impact our operations.
We depend on our computer and communications systems. As a multi-national corporation, we rely on
our computer and communication network to operate efficiently. Any interruption of this service
from power loss, telecommunications failure, weather, natural disasters or any similar event could
negatively impact our business and operations. Additionally, hackers and computer viruses have
disrupted operations at many major companies. We may be vulnerable to similar acts of sabotage,
which could materially harm our business and operations.
The market price of our common stock may continue to be volatile. The market price of our common
stock has fluctuated significantly from time to time. The trading price of our common stock could
experience significant fluctuations in the future, including as a result of:
17
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or financial position; |
|
|
|
|
repurchases of common stock; |
|
|
|
|
commencement of litigation; |
|
|
|
|
the introduction of new services, products or technologies by us, our suppliers or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in other conditions or trends in the wireless voice and data industry; |
|
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulation and the enforcement of such regulation; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the assessment of our credit rating as determined by various credit rating agencies; and |
|
|
|
|
changes in securities analysts estimates of our future performance or that of our competitors or
our industry in general. |
General market price declines or market volatility in the prices of stock for companies in the
global wireless industry or in the distribution or logistic services sectors of the global wireless
industry could also cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
There are amounts of our securities issuable pursuant to our 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan and our
Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock Compensation Plan that, if issued, could result in
dilution to existing shareholders, reduce earnings and earnings per share in future periods and
reduce the market price of our common stock. We have reserved a significant number of shares of
common stock that may be issuable pursuant to these plans. Grants made under these plans could
result in dilution to existing shareholders.
We have instituted measures to protect us against a takeover. Certain provisions of our By-laws,
shareholders rights and option plans, certain employment agreements and the Indiana Business
Corporation Law are designed to protect us in the event of a takeover attempt. These provisions
could prohibit or delay mergers or attempted takeovers or changes in control of the Company and,
accordingly, may discourage attempts to acquire us.
Our operating results may be negatively impacted in the event any or all of three recently
announced acquisitions of distribution customers of our North America operations are completed. In
November, AT&T Inc acquired Dobson. Dobson is a significant product distribution and logistic
services customer of our North America operations. On July 30, 2007, Verizon Wireless announced
that it will acquire RCC. RCC is a distribution customer of our North America operations. This
acquisition is expected to be completed in the first half of 2008. On September 17, 2007, T-Mobile
USA, Inc. announced that it will acquire SunCom. SunCom is a significant product distribution and
logistic services customer of our North America operations. This acquisition is expected to close
in the first quarter of 2008. These customers were also customers of the operations acquired from
CellStar. The acquisition of Dobson by AT&T and the potential acquisitions of RCC by Verizon and of
SunCom by T-Mobile may negatively impact our operating results. Our North America operations are
undertaking significant cost cutting efforts which included consolidating the CellStar operations
previously performed in the Coppell, Texas facility into our other North America operations.
Savings associated with this facility consolidation and other cost cutting efforts are intended to
help mitigate some of the negative impact from AT&Ts acquisition of Dobson, Verizons pending
acquisition of RCC and T-Mobiles pending acquisition of SunCom. However, there can be no assurance
that we will be successful in achieving sufficient cost savings to mitigate any negative impacts.
We incurred additional financial obligations as a result of the acquisitions of Dangaard Telecom
and the U.S. operations and the Miami-based Latin America business of CellStar Corporation in 2007,
and our inability to satisfy these could materially and adversely affect our operating results and
financial condition and harm our business. In connection with the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom,
we assumed all of Dangaard Telecoms liabilities, including approximately $348.7 million of its
outstanding debt. Upon the closing of the acquisition, we entered into an amendment to our existing
credit agreement to increase our borrowing capacity thereunder by $310 million, to $550 million,
and used proceeds from this amended facility to refinance substantially all of Dangaard Telecoms
obligations under its existing credit facilities. Accordingly, our borrowings and debt service
requirements have increased dramatically as a result of the acquisition and the related amendment
and expansion of our credit facilities. Our inability to satisfy our debt service requirements
could cause us to be in default under our credit facilities. If we materially default or breach our
obligations under our credit facilities, we could be required to pay a higher rate of interest on
our borrowings. Our lenders could also accelerate our repayment obligations or require us to repay
all amounts under the credit facilities. Accordingly, a default of obligations under our credit
18
facilities could significantly increase our cash flow needs and cause us to incur substantial
damages, all of which could harm our business.
We may become subject to suits alleging medical risks associated with our wireless devices.
Lawsuits or claims have been filed or made against manufacturers of wireless devices over the past
years alleging possible medical risks, including brain cancer, associated with the electromagnetic
fields emitted by wireless communications devices. There has been only limited relevant research in
this area, and this research has not been conclusive as to what effects, if any, exposure to
electromagnetic fields emitted by wireless devices has on human cells. Substantially all of our
revenues are derived, either directly or indirectly, from sales of wireless devices. We may become
subject to lawsuits filed by plaintiffs alleging various health risks from our products. If any
future studies find possible health risks associated with the use of wireless devices or if any
damages claim against us is successful, it could harm our business. Even an unsubstantiated
perception that health risks exist could negatively impact our ability or the ability of our
customers to market wireless devices.
Risks relating to our recent acquisition of Dangaard Telecom
If we are not able to integrate Dangaard Telecoms operations in a timely manner, we may not
realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition in a timely fashion, or at all, and our
business could be harmed . The success of our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom will depend, in part,
on our ability to realize the anticipated revenue enhancements, growth opportunities and synergies
expected from the combination of Dangaard Telecoms operations with our historical operations and
our ability to effectively utilize the additional resources that we acquired as a result of the
acquisition. The integration of Dangaard Telecom operations with our other operations will be a
complex, time-consuming and potentially expensive process and may disrupt our business if not
completed in a timely and efficient manner. During the process of integrating and managing the
acquired Dangaard Telecom technology, operations and personnel, we may encounter difficulties in
connection with, or as a result of, the following:
|
|
|
the integration of administrative, financial, information technology and
operating resources and the coordination of marketing and sales efforts; |
|
|
|
|
the implementation of financial, human resources, legal, information technology,
and other processes and related control environments; |
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements attention from other ongoing business concerns; and |
|
|
|
|
potential conflicts between business cultures. |
This integration may be especially difficult and unpredictable because our executive headquarters
are based in Indiana, and all of Dangaard Telecoms operations are based overseas. If we fail to
successfully integrate Dangaard Telecoms business and operations and/or fail to realize the
intended benefits of the acquisition, our business would be adversely impacted and the market price
of our common stock could decline. To achieve the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, we will
need to, among other things:
|
|
|
demonstrate to our vendors, suppliers and customers (including those of Dangaard
Telecom) that the acquisition has not resulted, and will not result, in adverse
changes to customer service standards or our business focus; and |
|
|
|
|
effectively control the progress of the integration process and the associated costs. |
Our assessment of the potential synergies and cost savings is preliminary and subject to change. We
may need to incur additional costs to realize the potential synergies and cost savings, and there
can be no assurance that such costs will not be material.
We could be exposed to unknown pre-existing liabilities of Dangaard Telecom, which could cause us
to incur substantial financial obligations and harm our business. In connection with the
acquisition, we may have assumed liabilities of Dangaard Telecom of which we are not aware and may
have little or no recourse against Dangaard Holding with respect thereto. If we were to discover
that there were intentional misrepresentations made to us by Dangaard Holding, or its
representatives, we would explore all possible legal remedies to compensate us for any loss,
including our rights to indemnification under the shareholder agreement that we entered into with
Dangaard Holding upon the closing of the Dangaard Telecom acquisition (the shareholder
agreement). However, there is no assurance that in such case legal remedies would be available or
collectible. If such unknown liabilities exist and we are not fully indemnified for any loss that
we incur as a result thereof, we could incur substantial financial obligations, which could
negatively impact our financial condition and harm our business.
19
Acquisition-related accounting impairment and amortization charges may delay and reduce our
post-acquisition profitability. Our acquisition of Dangaard Telecom has been accounted for under
the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, under generally accepted accounting principles, the
acquired assets and assumed liabilities of Dangaard Telecom have been recorded on our books
post-acquisition at their fair values at the date the acquisition was completed. Any excess of the
value of the consideration paid by us at the date the acquisition was completed over the fair value
of the identifiable tangible and finite-lived intangible assets of Dangaard Telecom is treated as
excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired (commonly known as goodwill).
Under current accounting standards, finite-lived intangible assets will be amortized to expense
over their estimated useful lives, which will reduce our post-acquisition profitability over
several years. In addition, goodwill will be tested on an annual basis for impairment, which may
result in non-cash accounting impairment charges.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2. Properties.
We provide our distribution and logistic services from our sales and operations centers located in
various countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, India, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal,
Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, and the United
States. All of these facilities are occupied pursuant to operating leases. The table below
summarizes information about our sales and operations centers by operating division.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Locations(1) |
|
|
Square Footage |
|
Americas |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,528,321 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
262,122 |
|
Europe |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
823,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
2,614,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refers to facilities operated by the Company that are greater than 1,000 square feet. |
We believe that our existing facilities are adequate for our current requirements and that suitable
additional space will be available as needed to accommodate future expansion of our operations.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
The Company is from time to time involved in certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of
conducting its business. While the ultimate liability pursuant to these actions cannot currently be
determined, the Company believes these legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on
its financial position or results of operations. For more information on legal proceedings, see
Note 12 Legal Proceedings, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders.
20
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities. |
Our Common Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CELL. The following
tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sale prices for our Common Stock as
reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
14.02 |
|
|
$ |
10.17 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
14.65 |
|
|
|
11.73 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
15.01 |
|
|
|
11.17 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
18.18 |
|
|
|
14.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
High |
|
Low |
First Quarter |
|
$ |
25.88 |
|
|
$ |
15.94 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
27.90 |
|
|
|
13.25 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
17.10 |
|
|
|
10.96 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
14.65 |
|
|
|
11.35 |
|
The Company has declared the following forward and reverse common stock splits. All of the forward
stock splits were effected in the form of common stock dividends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Payment or |
|
|
Declaration Date |
|
Stock Split Effective Date |
|
Split Ratio |
August 31, 1995
|
|
September 20, 1995
|
|
5 for 4 |
November 12, 1996
|
|
December 17, 1996
|
|
3 for 2 |
January 28, 1997
|
|
March 3, 1997
|
|
5 for 4 |
October 22, 1997
|
|
November 21, 1997
|
|
2 for 1 |
June 26, 2002
|
|
June 27, 2002
|
|
1 for 7 |
July 29, 2003
|
|
August 25, 2003
|
|
3 for 2 |
September 15, 2003
|
|
October 15, 2003
|
|
3 for 2 |
August 12, 2005
|
|
September 15, 2005
|
|
3 for 2 |
December 5, 2005
|
|
December 30, 2005
|
|
3 for 2 |
May 9, 2006
|
|
May 31, 2006
|
|
6 for 5 |
At February 20, 2008, there were 325 shareholders of record.
We have not paid cash dividends on our Common Stock other than S corporation distributions made to
shareholders during periods prior to the rescissions of S corporation elections. In addition,
certain of our bank agreements require consent from the lender prior to declaring or paying cash
dividends, making capital distributions or other payments to shareholders. The Board of Directors
intends to continue a policy of retaining earnings to finance the growth and development of the
business and does not expect to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
The information regarding equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference to Item 12 of this
Form 10-K, which incorporates by reference the information set forth in the Companys Definitive
Proxy Statement in connection with the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the 2007
fiscal year.
The following line graph compares, from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2007, the cumulative
total shareholder return on the Companys Common Stock with the cumulative total return on the
stocks comprising the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, NASDAQ Market Value Index and the Hemscott Group
Index (the Coredata Group Index was renamed the Hemscott Group Index in March of 2005). The
comparison assumes $100 was invested on January 2, 2003 in the Companys Common Stock and in each
of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of all cash dividends, if any, paid on such
securities. The Company has not paid any cash dividends and, therefore, the cumulative total return
calculation for the Company is based solely upon share price appreciation and not upon reinvestment
of cash dividends. Historical share price is not necessarily indicative of future stock price
performance.
21
COMPARISON
OF 5-YEAR COMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
ASSUMES
$100 INVESTED ON JAN. 1, 2003
ASSUMES DIVIDEND REINVESTED
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31, 2007
22
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2007(1) |
|
2006(1) |
|
2005 |
|
2004(1) |
|
2003(1) |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
4,300,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,140,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,772,424 |
|
|
$ |
1,692,580 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
270,586 |
|
|
|
150,906 |
|
|
|
132,012 |
|
|
|
104,764 |
|
|
|
86,324 |
|
Operating income from continuing
operations |
|
|
65,913 |
|
|
|
48,371 |
|
|
|
44,353 |
|
|
|
35,567 |
|
|
|
20,355 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
46,719 |
|
|
|
36,190 |
|
|
|
31,918 |
|
|
|
23,826 |
|
|
|
13,861 |
|
Total gain (loss) from discontinued operations, net
of income taxes |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(21,478 |
) |
|
|
(10,056 |
) |
|
|
(2,132 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
47,394 |
|
|
|
35,610 |
|
|
|
10,440 |
|
|
|
13,770 |
|
|
|
11,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.45 |
) |
|
|
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
525,778 |
|
|
$ |
159,760 |
|
|
$ |
121,336 |
|
|
$ |
103,525 |
|
|
$ |
96,839 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,972,361 |
|
|
|
778,353 |
|
|
|
487,824 |
|
|
|
437,584 |
|
|
|
444,690 |
|
Long-term obligations |
|
|
441,521 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,370,778 |
|
|
|
583,525 |
|
|
|
338,782 |
|
|
|
286,847 |
|
|
|
297,106 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
600,765 |
|
|
|
194,828 |
|
|
|
149,042 |
|
|
|
150,737 |
|
|
|
147,584 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating data includes certain items that were recorded in the years presented as follows:
restructuring charges in 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2003; and $16.1 million of tax benefits in 2007. See
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition. |
|
(2) |
|
Per share amounts for all periods have been adjusted to reflect the 6 for 5 Common Stock split
(paid in the form of a stock dividend) effected on May 31, 2006, and the 3 for 2 common stock
splits (paid in the form of stock dividends) effected on December 30, 2005, September 15, 2005,
October 15, 2003, and August 15, 2003. |
23
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
OVERVIEW AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Brightpoint, Inc. is a global leader in the distribution of wireless devices and accessories and
provision of customized logistic services to the wireless industry. We have operations centers
and/or sales offices in various countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Colombia, Denmark,
Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Philippines,
Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates
and the United States. We provide customized integrated logistic services including procurement,
inventory management, software loading, kitting and customized packaging, fulfillment, credit
services and receivables management, call center and activation services, website hosting,
e-fulfillment solutions and other services within the global wireless industry. Our customers
include mobile network operators, mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs), resellers, retailers
and wireless equipment manufacturers. We distribute wireless communication devices and we provide
value-added distribution and logistic services for wireless products manufactured by companies such
as High Tech Computer Corp., Kyocera, LG Electronics, Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, Siemens, Sony
Ericsson and UTStarcom.
We measure our performance by focusing on certain key performance indicators such as the number of
wireless devices handled, gross margin by service line, operating income, cash flow, cash
conversion cycle, return on invested capital and liquidity.
We manage our business based on two distinct service lines which include product distribution and
logistic services. During 2007, wireless devices sold through distribution grew by 100%, and
wireless devices handled through logistic services increased by 41%. Our distribution gross margin
increased by 0.3 percentage points to 4.2%, and our logistic services gross margin increased by 7.8
percentage points to 28.9%. We are focused on increasing the total volume of wireless devices
handled as opposed to increasing volume in one specific service line as both service lines provide
a reasonable return in relation to the capital invested and the risk assumed.
Our revenues are significantly influenced by growth in the total number of wireless devices sold to
subscribers globally by the entire industry. In 2007, it is estimated that the global wireless
industry shipped approximately 1.2 billion wireless devices. This was an increase of approximately
18% from 2006. The total number of wireless devices handled by us grew by 55% from 2006. For 2008,
we expect to handle over 100 million wireless devices. Revenues grew by 77% to $4.3 billion and
income from continuing operations was $46.7 million or $0.73 per diluted share which represented a
29% increase in income from continuing operations from 2006. Net income increased by 33% to $47.4
million, or $0.74 per diluted share in 2007 from $35.6 million, or $0.70 per diluted share in 2006.
Significant developments and events in 2007 include:
|
|
|
Dangaard Telecom Acquisition. On July 31, 2007, we completed the acquisition of all of
the issued and outstanding capital stock of Dangaard Telecom A/S, a Danish company
(Dangaard Telecom) from Dangaard Holding A/S, a Danish company for a purchase price of (i)
$100,000 in cash and (ii) 30,000,000 shares of the Companys unregistered Common Stock,
$0.01 par value (including 3,000,000 shares held in escrow). In addition, we assumed
approximately $348.7 million of Dangaard Telecoms indebtedness. The acquisition of
Dangaard Telecom expands our existing European operations. Dangaard Telecom was the leading
distributor of wireless devices and accessories in Europe. Results of operations for
Dangaard Telecom are included in our consolidated results of operations beginning on August
1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Significant Industry Developments. In November, AT&T Inc. acquired Dobson Communications
Corporation (Dobson). Dobson is a significant product distribution and logistic services
customer of our North America operations. On July 30, 2007, Verizon Wireless announced that
it will acquire Rural Cellular Corporation (RCC). RCC is a distribution customer of our
North America operations. The Verizon/RCC acquisition is expected to be completed in the
first half of 2008. On September 17, 2007, T-Mobile USA, Inc. announced that it will
acquire SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc. (SunCom). SunCom is a significant product
distribution and logistic services customer of our North America operations. This
acquisition is expected to close in the first quarter of 2008. These customers were also
customers of the operations acquired from CellStar. The acquisition of Dobson by AT&T and
the potential acquisitions of RCC by Verizon and of SunCom by T-Mobile may negatively
impact our operating results. Our North America operations are undertaking significant cost
cutting efforts which included consolidating the CellStar operations previously performed
in the Coppell, Texas facility into our other North America operations. Savings associated
with this facility consolidation and other cost cutting efforts are intended to help
mitigate some |
24
|
|
|
of the negative impact from AT&Ts acquisition of Dobson, Verizons pending acquisition of
RCC and T-Mobiles pending acquisition of SunCom. However, there can be no assurance that we
will be successful in achieving sufficient cost savings to mitigate any negative impacts. |
|
|
|
|
CellStar Corporation Acquisition. On March 30, 2007, we completed the acquisition of
certain assets and the assumption of certain liabilities related to the U.S. operations and
the Miami-based Latin America business of CellStar Corporation for $67.5 million (including
direct acquisition costs). Results of operations related to this acquisition are included
in our Consolidated Statement of Operations beginning April 1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
New Global Credit Facility. On February 16, 2007, we entered into a credit agreement
(the Credit Agreement), by and among us, Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead
arranger and book manager, General Electric Capital Corporation, as syndication agent, ABN
AMRO Bank N.V., as documentation agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as documentation agent,
Bank of America, N.A., as administration agent and the other lenders party thereto. The
Credit Agreement established a five year senior secured revolving credit facility with a
line of credit in the initial amount of $165.0 million. The Credit Agreement contained an
uncommitted accordion facility pursuant to which we were able to increase the total
commitment under the revolving credit facility to $240.0 million. On March 30, 2007, we
entered into a Commitment Increase Agreement with the Guarantors, the Administrative Agent
and the Lenders to increase the total commitment under the revolving credit facility to
$240.0 million. The Credit Agreement replaced our $70.0 million North American asset based
credit facility under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 18, 2004,
as amended, and the $50.0 million Australian Dollar (approximately $39.0 million U.S.
Dollars) asset based credit facility in Australia under the credit agreement dated December
24, 2002, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Credit Facility. On July 31, 2007, we entered into the First Amendment to
the Credit Agreement, which, among other things, resulted in: (i) an increase in the amount
available for borrowing under the secured revolving credit facility from $240.0 million to
$300.0 million, (ii) the extension to the domestic borrowers of a term loan in an original
principal amount of $125.0 million, (iii) the extension to the foreign borrowers, including
one of the Dangaard companies, of a term loan in an original principal amount equivalent to
$125.0 million (denominated in Euros), (iv) the addition to the Credit Agreement of two
Dangaard companies as foreign borrowers and five other Dangaard companies as foreign
guarantors, and (v) increased commitments, in certain cases, from existing members of the
bank group, and new commitments from other lenders who became new members of the bank group
upon the closing of the First Amendment. |
2007 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenue and units handled by division and service line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
960,405 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
$ |
612,386 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,521,684 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
1,088,247 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
1,460,006 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
396,877 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
268 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,942,095 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,097,510 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logistic services revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
195,028 |
|
|
|
55 |
% |
|
$ |
202,202 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
36,445 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
27,487 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
126,707 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
98,174 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
358,180 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
327,863 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
1,155,433 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
$ |
814,588 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,558,129 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
1,115,734 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
1,586,713 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
495,051 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
221 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,300,275 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless devices sold through distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
7,117 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
13,160 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
355 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
25,735 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
12,841 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wireless devices handled through logistic services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
52,492 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
38,446 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
425 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
57,207 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
40,698 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wireless devices handled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
59,609 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
42,740 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
14,916 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
8,417 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
377 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
82,942 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
53,539 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2007 revenues by service line compared with
the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling price, foreign currency, and
acquisitions had on these percentage changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2006 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume (1) |
|
revenue (2) |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Subtotal (3) |
|
Acquisitions |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Handset based revenue includes revenue from wireless devices sold through our distribution
business and revenue from wireless devices handled through our logistic services business. |
|
(2) |
|
Non-handset distribution revenue includes revenue from accessories sold, freight, non-voice
navigation devices and PCs and PC accessories sold through our distribution business. Non-handset
based logistic services revenue includes revenue from the sale of prepaid airtime, freight billed,
and fee based services other than fees earned from wireless devices handled. |
|
(3) |
|
The subtotal represents the percent change in distribution revenue and logistic services
revenue excluding the impact the acquisitions of the North America and Latin America operations of
CellStar on March 31, 2007 and the acqusition of Dangaard Telecom on July 31, 2007. |
26
Revenue and wireless devices handled by division:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Americas |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
2007 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
960,405 |
|
|
|
83 |
% |
|
$ |
612,386 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
195,028 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
202,202 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,155,433 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
814,588 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
7,117 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
52,492 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
38,446 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
59,609 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
42,740 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2007 revenues for our Americas division by
service line compared with the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling price,
and foreign currency had on these percentage changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2006 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
CellStar |
|
|
|
|
volume |
|
revenue |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Subtotal |
|
Acquisition |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
(11 |
%) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
The increase in wireless devices handled through logistic services in our Americas division was
primarily driven by our successful launch of logistic services for T-Mobile during the second
quarter of 2007, increased demand due to market growth in North America experienced by current
logistic services customers as well as expanded services offered to our current logistic services
customers. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in wireless devices handled through
logistic services as a result of a reduction in units handled in Columbia due to a reduction in
promotional activities by our customer and due to increased competition. The decrease in revenue
from non-handset based logistic services was due to a shift in mix to fee based prepaid airtime
fulfillment (net method) from prepaid airtime transactions recorded using the gross method. Average
fulfillment fee per unit decreased due to a reduced fee structure associated with the modification
and extension of a logistic services agreement with a significant customer in our North America
business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
2007 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
1,521,684 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
$ |
1,088,247 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
36,445 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
27,487 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,558,129 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,115,734 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
13,160 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
14,916 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2007 revenues for our Asia-Pacific division
by service line compared with the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling
price, and foreign currency had on these percentage changes.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2006 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
volume |
|
revenue |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(40 |
%) |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
The increases in distribution revenue and wireless devices sold in our Asia-Pacific division were
driven by increased volume of devices sold to customers served by our Singapore business
(previously served by our Brightpoint Asia Limited business) as a result of improved product
availability at competitive prices as well as new products launched by our suppliers. In addition,
we believe we sold more devices to these customers as a result of improved visibility into these
channels by serving these customers through our business in Singapore rather than our Brightpoint
Asia Limited business. The decrease in average selling price in our Asia-Pacific division was also
driven by our Singapore business as a result of a significant increase in sales of lower priced
handsets due to market demand for these handsets. The increase in non-handset based revenue was
primarily due to an increase in revenue from repair services in India.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
2007 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
1,460,006 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
$ |
396,877 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
268 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
126,707 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
98,174 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,586,713 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
495,051 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
221 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
355 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
2,959 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
425 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,417 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
377 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2007 revenues for our Europe division by
service line compared with the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling price,
foreign currency, and acquisitions had on these percentage changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2006 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
Dangaard |
|
|
|
|
volume |
|
revenue |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Subtotal |
|
Acquisition |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
%) |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
237 |
% |
|
|
268 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
The increase in distribution revenue was due primarily to the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom. The
acquisition of Dangaard Telecom expanded our Europe operations to include nine countries in which
we historically did not have a significant operating presence. In countries in which both companies
had a significant operating presence, the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom allowed us to increase
our market share. Excluding the Dangaard Telecom operations, distribution revenue in our Europe
division increased 31%. The increase in handset-based volume excluding the Dangaard Telecom
operations was primarily due to an increase in wireless devices sold by our Finland and Slovakia
operations. The increase in non-handset based revenue was due primarily to an increase in
accessories and non-voice capable navigation devices sold.
The increase in logistic services revenue was due primarily to the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom,
which was included in our results of operations beginning on August 1, 2007. In order to conform to
Brightpoint accounting policies and US GAAP, Dangaard Telecom changed its revenue recognition for
arrangements where Dangaard Telecom serves as the agent in the transaction. The revenue from
these arrangements is included in logistic services revenue. Excluding the Dangaard Telecom
operations, logistic services revenue in our Europe division increased 6%.
28
Gross Profit and Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
166,930 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
$ |
81,774 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
104 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
103,656 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
69,132 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
270,586 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
150,906 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
points |
|
Logistic services |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
points |
|
Gross margin |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
points |
|
The increase in gross profit in our distribution business was due to the growth in distribution
revenue primarily related to the acquisitions of Dangaard Telecom and CellStar. The increase in
distribution gross margin was primarily driven by a shift in mix toward higher margin distribution
business in Europe resulting from the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom. The increase in gross margin
in our Europe division was partially offset by a decrease in gross margin in our Asia-Pacific
division due to sales of the slow-moving inventory within Asia at lower prices in an effort to
improve sell-through of these devices. The decrease in Asia-Pacific gross margin was partially
offset by an increase in gross margin on devices sold to customers served by our Singapore
business. Distribution gross margin in our Singapore business was significantly higher than
historical levels during the second half of 2007 as a result of a strong product line-up from our
largest supplier as well as favorable product allocations. There can be no assurances that we will
continue to experience similar margins or as favorable product allocations in our Singapore
business in the future.
The increase in gross profit in our logistic services business was primarily due to the 7.8
percentage point increase in gross margin from logistic services. The increase in gross margin from
logistic services was primarily driven by our Americas division as a result of improved operating
efficiency, increased leverage of our cost infrastructure over higher volumes and a shift in mix to
fee based prepaid airtime fulfillment (net method) from prepaid airtime transactions recorded using
the gross method. The increase in wireless devices handled through logistic services in our
Americas division was primarily driven by our successful launch of logistic services for T-Mobile
during the second quarter of 2007 as well as an increase in devices handled for our existing
customers. Logistic services gross margin was also positively impacted by an increase in logistic
services gross profit and gross margin in our Europe division resulting from the acquisition of
Dangaard as well as improved profitability of our repair business in India.
Selling General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses |
|
$ |
185,484 |
|
|
$ |
102,253 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
Percent of revenue |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% points |
As a percent of revenue, SG&A expenses increased 0.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared
to the prior year. SG&A expenses associated with the Dangaard operations represented $46.8 million
of the overall increase in SG&A expenses for year ended December 31, 2007. We expect SG&A as a
percent of revenue to be slightly higher in 2008 as a result of the full year impact of the
operations of Dangaard Telecom including the impact of conforming Dangaard Telecom to Brightpoint
accounting policies. A majority of our SG&A expenses do not vary with seasonal changes in volume.
As a result, we would expect SG&A expenses as a percent of revenue to fluctuate on a quarterly
basis.
Amortization
Amortization expense was $10.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $0.3
million for the same period in the prior year. The increase in amortization expense relates to
finite-lived intangible assets acquired in connection with the CellStar and Dangaard Telecom
transactions. We allocated the purchase price of the Dangaard Telecom and CellStar acquisitions
based on preliminary estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
assets acquired in
29
connection with the Dangaard Telecom transaction included $123.1 million of finite-lived intangible
assets assigned to the customer relationships. The acquired finite-lived intangible assets have a
useful life of approximately fifteen years and are being amortized over the period that the assets
are expected to contribute to our future cash flows. The assets are being amortized on an
accelerated method based on the projected cash flows used for valuation purposes. We believe that
these cash flows are most reflective of the pattern in which the economic benefit of the
finite-lived intangible assets will be consumed. For the 2008 fiscal year, we expect to recognize
approximately $17.0 million to $20.0 million of amortization expense related to the finite-lived
intangible assets acquired in the Dangaard Telecom and CellStar acquisitions.
Restructuring charge
Restructuring charge was $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. In the fourth quarter
of 2007, we decided to terminate Dangaard Telecoms implementation of SAP enterprise resource
planning and related software. As part of that decision, the Company determined that costs
capitalized related to the project in the period after the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom were
impaired under SFAS 144. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $7.1 million was recorded in our
Europe division. In addition, we recorded $1.4 million in severance and other costs to consolidate
the Brightpoint and Dangaard Telecom operations in Germany. We anticipate taking an additional
restructuring charge during the first half of 2008 of approximately $3.2 million to $3.8 million
associated with the final exit of our redundant warehouse and office facility in Germany.
Operating Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
43,710 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
$ |
41,377 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
27,960 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
17,564 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
21,257 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
11,391 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(27,014 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
%) |
|
|
(21,961 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
%) |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
65,913 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
48,371 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income as a Percent of Revenue by Division:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
(1.3)% points |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
0.2% points |
Europe |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
(1.0)% points |
Total |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
(0.5)% points |
The increase in operating income from continuing operations in our Americas division for the year
ended December 31, 2007 was primarily as a result the acquisition of the CellStar operations and
the launch of logistic services for T-Mobile, which were partially offset by a lower average
fulfillment fee per unit due to a reduced fee structure associated with the modification and
extension of a logistic services agreement with a significant customer in our North America
business and reduced volumes in Colombia.
The increase in operating income from continuing operations in our Asia-Pacific division for the
year ended December 31, 2007 was primarily due to an increase in the volume of devices sold to
customers served by our Singapore business (previously served by our Brightpoint Asia Limited
business) as a result of improved product availability at competitive prices and new products
launched by our suppliers. Distribution gross margin in our Singapore business was significantly
higher than historical levels during the second half of 2007 as a result of a strong product
line-up from our largest supplier as well as favorable product allocations. This was partially
offset by a decrease in gross margin in our Asia-Pacific division due to sales of the slow-moving
inventory within Asia at lower prices in an effort
to improve sell-through of these devices. There can be no assurances that we will continue to
experience similar margins or as favorable product allocations in our Singapore business in the
future.
30
The increase in operating income from continuing operations in our Europe division was primarily
due to the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom, which significantly expanded our operations in Europe.
Operating loss from continuing operations in our corporate headquarters increased $5.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the prior year. The increase in operating loss was due
to a $3.0 million increase in personnel costs primarily due to an increase in headcount in support
of overall growth and incentive compensation as well as $1.6 million of incremental costs
associated with integrating the Dangaard Telecom acquisition.
Interest
The components of interest, net are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
20,072 |
|
|
$ |
2,278 |
|
|
|
781 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net |
|
$ |
18,017 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
|
3158 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense includes interest on outstanding debt, fees paid for unused capacity on credit
lines and amortization of deferred financing fees. The increase in interest expense for the year
December 31, 2007 compared to the prior year was primarily due to debt assumed in the Dangaard
Telecom acquisition and borrowings for the CellStar acquisition.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
12,238 |
|
|
|
(96 |
)% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
(24.4)% points |
Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 is net of a $2.1 million benefit resulting
from a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Germany as well as a $14.1 million benefit related to
the reversal of valuation allowances on certain foreign tax credit carryforwards. Based on taxable
income and utilization of prior net operating loss carryforwards, it became more likely than not
during the second quarter of 2007 that we will be able to utilize these foreign tax credits prior
to their expiration. Excluding the impact of these benefits, our effective tax rate would have been
35.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily due to a shift in mix of income between
jurisdictions. For the 2008 fiscal year, we expect our effective tax rate to be within the range of
32.0% to 35.0%. Our effective tax rate is typically lower than the United States statutory tax
rates primarily due to the benefit from foreign operations that have lower statutory rates than the
United States.
Return on Invested Capital from Operations (ROIC)
We believe that it is important for a business to manage its balance sheet as well as it manages
its statement of operations. A measurement that ties the statement of operations performance with
the balance sheet performance is Return on Invested Capital from Operations, or ROIC. We believe
that if we are able to grow our earnings while minimizing the use of invested capital, we will be
optimizing shareholder value while preserving resources in preparation for further potential growth
opportunities. We take a simple approach in calculating ROIC: we apply an estimated average tax
rate to the operating income of our continuing operations with adjustments for unusual items, such
as restructuring charges, and apply this tax-adjusted operating income to our average capital base,
which, in our case, is our shareholders equity and debt. The details of this measurement are
outlined below.
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
Operating income after taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
|
65,913 |
|
|
|
48,371 |
|
|
|
44,353 |
|
Plus: Restructuring charge (benefit) |
|
|
8,661 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
933 |
|
Less: estimated income taxes (1) |
|
|
(2,844 |
) |
|
|
(12,254 |
) |
|
|
(11,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income after taxes |
|
$ |
71,730 |
|
|
$ |
36,108 |
|
|
$ |
33,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
460,853 |
|
|
$ |
17,625 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
600,765 |
|
|
|
194,828 |
|
|
|
149,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested capital |
|
$ |
1,061,618 |
|
|
$ |
212,453 |
|
|
$ |
149,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average invested capital (2) |
|
$ |
573,913 |
|
|
$ |
170,480 |
|
|
$ |
149,578 |
|
ROIC (3) |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated income taxes were calculated by multiplying the sum of operating income from
continuing operations and the facility consolidation charge by the respective periods
effective tax rate. |
|
(2) |
|
Average invested capital for the annual periods represents the simple average of the invested
capital amounts for the current and four prior quarter period ends. |
|
(3) |
|
ROIC is calculated by dividing operating income after taxes by average invested capital. |
The decline in ROIC from 2006 to 2007 was primarily due to the increase in average invested capital
compared the prior year. Average invested capital was negatively impacted for the year ended
December 31, 2007 by an increase in invested capital to fund the acquisitions of Dangaard Telecom
and CellStar, including $318.2 million of acquired goodwill. Operating income after taxes was
positively impacted for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the prior year by the $2.1
million tax benefit resulting from a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Germany in the third
quarter of 2007. In addition, operating income after taxes was positively impacted for the year
ended December 31, 2007 by the $14.1 million tax benefit related to the reversal of valuation
allowances on certain foreign tax credits during the second quarter of 2007.
In addition, operating income after taxes was negatively impacted for the year ended December 31,
2007 by $6.8 million (after-tax) of non-cash amortization expense related to finite-lived
intangible assets in connection with the acquisitions of Dangaard Telecom and CellStar discussed
above.
Our overall ROIC may continue to decrease, and we currently estimate that it could go as low as
7% to 9%. We anticipate that our ROIC will trend upwards from this low point as we complete the
integration of Dangaard Telecom, obtain anticipated synergies, obtain combined balance sheet
improvements and reduce our debt.
32
2006 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenue and Wireless Devices Handled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
2005 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
REVENUE BY DIVISION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
814,588 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
675,074 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1,115,734 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
1,081,529 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
495,051 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
383,574 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,140,177 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE BY SERVICE LINE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
2,097,510 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
$ |
1,845,983 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
327,863 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
294,194 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,140,177 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED BY DIVISION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
42,740 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
33,002 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Europe |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
53,539 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
42,081 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED BY SERVICE LINE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
12,841 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
11,769 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
40,698 |
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
30,312 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
53,539 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
42,081 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2006 revenues by service line compared with
the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling price, and foreign currency had on
these percentage changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2005 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
volume (1) |
|
revenue (2) |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Handset based revenue includes revenue from wireless devices sold through our
distribution business and revenue from wireless devices handled through our logistic
services business. |
|
(2) |
|
Non-handset distribution revenue includes revenue from accessories sold, freight
billed, non-voice navigation devices and PCs and PC accessories sold through our
distribution business. Non-handset based logistic services revenue includes revenue
from the sale of prepaid airtime, freight, and fee based services other than fees
earned from wireless devices handled. |
33
Revenue and wireless devices handled by division:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Americas |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
2005 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
612,386 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
$ |
507,508 |
|
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
202,202 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
167,566 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
814,588 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
675,074 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
4,294 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
3,566 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
38,446 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
29,436 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
42,740 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
33,002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2006 revenues for our Americas division by
service line compared with the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling price,
and foreign currency had on these percentage changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2005 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
volume |
|
revenue |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
The number of wireless devices sold through our Americas distribution business increased primarily
as a result of an overall increase in market demand and the addition of new suppliers and customers
in 2006 and late 2005. Manufacturers continued to launch new and innovative products and offer
compelling pricing on products, which drove strong market demand. During 2006 we believe we
increased our market share with Tier 2 and Tier 3 operators through our preferred supplier
agreements with Revol and the Associated Carrier Group (ACG). We believe these preferred supplier
agreements continue to enhance our relationship with Motorola and other product suppliers within
the regional carrier channel.
The increase in wireless devices handled through logistic services in our Americas division was due
primarily to increased demand as a result of market growth experienced by current logistic services
customers as well as expanded services offered to our current logistic services customers. The
growth in wireless devices handled through logistic services in our Americas division was slowed by
a 13% decline in volume in Colombia resulting from a decision by our primary network operator
customer in Colombia to reduce promotional activities significantly during the second half of 2006
due to market saturation in Colombia. The higher volume of wireless devices we previously handled
in Colombia was driven primarily by aggressive promotional activity by this operator customer in
order to increase their market share. As a result of this operators decision to focus on
profitability and asset management, we do not expect volume to return to levels we experienced in
previous quarters. Average fulfillment fee per unit decreased primarily due to volume based tiered
pricing as a result of certain of our current logistic services customers meeting volume thresholds
to achieve a lower pricing tier during the fourth quarter of 2006. In addition, average fulfillment
fee was negatively impacted during the fourth quarter of 2006 due to a reduced fee structure
associated with the modification and extension of a logistic services agreement with a significant
customer in our North America business.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
2005 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
1,088,247 |
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
$ |
1,054,051 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
27,487 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
27,478 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,115,734 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,081,529 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
94 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
290 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2006 revenues for our Asia-Pacific division
by service line compared with the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling
price, and foreign currency had on these percentage changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2005 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
volume |
|
revenue |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
(17 |
%) |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
The increases in distribution revenue and wireless devices sold in our Asia-Pacific division were
driven by our Brightpoint Asia Limited business, our operations in India and our expanded global
relationship with a major original equipment manufacturer. The increase in distribution revenue and
wireless devices in our Brightpoint Asia Limited business was a result of improved product
availability at competitive prices. The increase in distribution revenue and wireless devices sold
through our operations in India was a result of increased volumes with our existing suppliers as
well as diversifying our supplier base. Revenue in our Asia-Pacific division also increased as a
result of an expanded global relationship with a major original equipment manufacturer. We made
significant purchases of wireless devices near the end of September 2006 and near the end of
December 2006, which were procured under the terms of an existing supply agreement with this
manufacturer in the Philippines. However, we intend to sell the products through all of our
international operations including those outside of the Asia-Pacific region. Sales of these
wireless devices positively contributed to growth in distribution revenue in our Asia-Pacific
division; however, a significant portion of this inventory remained unsold as of the end of 2006.
The terms of the purchase provided for more favorable payment terms than were reflected in the
existing supply agreement. The increases in distribution revenue and wireless devices from our
Brightpoint Asia Limited business, our operations in India and from this expanded global
relationship were partially offset by a decrease in revenue and wireless devices sold through our
distribution business in Australia. The decrease in revenue and wireless devices sold through our
distribution business in Australia was due to the decision by a certain network operator to change
to a closed distribution model for 3G wireless devices as well as a change in terms with a
significant customer in that market to a fee-based logistic services arrangement from a
distribution arrangement.
Increases in logistic services revenue in Australia and India were offset by a decrease in logistic
services revenue in New Zealand. The decrease in logistic services revenue in New Zealand was due
to the reduction in revenue from the sale of prepaid airtime in New Zealand as a result of the
decision by a major network operator to change from prepaid airtime cards to electronic
distribution. We are not participating in electronic airtime distribution in New Zealand. The
increase in logistic services revenue in Australia resulted from an increase in handset fulfillment
revenue due to a shift to a fee-based logistic services arrangement from a distribution arrangement
with a significant customer in that market as discussed previously. The increase in logistic
services revenue in India was driven by an increase in volume and improved profitability on our
repair business in that market.
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
2005 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
396,877 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
$ |
284,424 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
98,174 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
99,150 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
495,051 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
383,574 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WIRELESS DEVICES HANDLED : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the percentage changes in 2006 revenues for our Europe division by
service line compared with the prior year, including the effect of volume, average selling price,
and foreign currency had on these percentage changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Percentage Change in Revenue vs. 2005 |
|
|
Handset- |
|
Non-handset |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
based |
|
based |
|
Selling |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
volume |
|
revenue |
|
Price |
|
Currency |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
%) |
The increases in average selling price and the number of devices sold through distribution in our
Europe division were primarily due to increased demand for and availability of branded converged
wireless devices as well as our entry into Russia during the second quarter of 2006. In addition,
we believe our Europe division benefited from market share gains in Sweden.
The decrease in logistic services revenue was primarily due to a shift in mix to fee based prepaid
airtime fulfillment revenue from prepaid airtime distribution revenue. This decrease was partially
offset by growth in handset fulfillment revenue in Slovakia and growth in revenue from repair
services in Germany. The increase in handset fulfillment revenue in Slovakia was due to increased
volume with our primary network operator customer in that market as a result of promotional
activity as well as expanded services offered to this customer.
Gross Profit and Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
2005 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
$ |
81,774 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
$ |
71,371 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Logistic services |
|
|
69,132 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
60,641 |
|
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
150,906 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
132,012 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
0.0% points |
|
|
|
|
Logistic services |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
0.5% points |
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
0.0% points |
|
|
|
|
Overall, our gross profit increased 14% to $150.9 million in 2006 compared to $132.0 million in
2005 due to the 13% growth in revenue. Gross profit in our distribution business increased 15% to
$81.8 million in 2006 primarily due to the 14% growth
in distribution revenue. Gross profit in our logistic services business increased 14% to $69.1
million in 2006 due to the 11% increase in logistic services revenue and the 0.5% percentage point
increase in gross margin from logistic services.
The increase in gross margin from logistic services was driven by our Asia-Pacific and Europe
divisions. Gross margin from logistic services increased in our Asia-Pacific division due to
improved profitability on our repair business in India as
36
discussed previously. The increase in
gross margin from logistic services in Europe was due to improved profitability on prepaid airtime
sold in our Sweden business including the shift in mix to fee based prepaid airtime fulfillment
revenue from prepaid airtime distribution revenue. The increases were partially offset by a
decrease in gross margin from logistic services in our Americas division. Our Americas division
experienced lower gross margin from handset fulfillment due in part to the reduced volume in
Colombia as discussed previously. Gross margin from handset fulfillment in our Americas division
also declined due to a lower average fulfillment fee per unit, a shift in mix to more complex
handset fulfillment services for which we have yet to realize operational efficiencies as well as
incremental costs associated with our new distribution facility opened in Plainfield, Indiana
during the first quarter of 2006. Our Americas division continues to focus on leveraging our
increased capacity through continued investment in automation and infrastructure. The decrease in
handset fulfillment gross margin in our Americas division was partially offset by higher gross
margin and gross profit from non-handset based logistic services as a result of expanded services
offered to current logistic services customers as well as a change in mix of services. As discussed
above, we modified and extended a logistic services agreement with a significant customer in our
Brightpoint North America business, which negatively impacted our profitability in December 2006.
Selling General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
SG&A expenses |
|
$ |
102,544 |
|
|
$ |
86,726 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Percent of revenue |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% points |
SG&A expenses increased $15.8 million or 18% compared to the prior year. As a percent of revenue,
SG&A expenses increased 0.1 percentage point compared to the prior year. The increase in SG&A
expenses was due to a $6.5 million increase in personnel costs primarily in support of overall
growth in unit volumes, a $3.2 million increase in non-cash stock based compensation including the
effect of adopting Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123(R), a $2.1 million
increase to support our investment in AWS in the Americas, a $2.9 million increase related to our
acquisition of Persequor in Asia-Pacific during the first quarter of 2006 and a $2.6 million
increase due to fluctuations in foreign currencies. These increases were partially offset by a $1.4
million decrease in incentive compensation.
Operating Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
Total |
|
2005 |
|
Total |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
41,377 |
|
|
|
85 |
% |
|
$ |
39,921 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
17,564 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
18,939 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Europe |
|
|
11,391 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
4,634 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
146 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(21,961 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
%) |
|
|
(19,141 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
%) |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
48,371 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
44,353 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Operating Income as a Percent of Revenue by Division:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
(0.8)% points |
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
(0.2)% points |
Europe |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
1.1 % points |
Total |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
(0.1)% points |
Operating income from continuing operations increased to $48.4 million in 2006 from $44.4 million
in 2005. The increase in operating income was due to an $18.9 million increase in gross profit
compared to a $15.8 million increase in SG&A expenses. Operating income also improved due to the
$0.9 million facility consolidation charge during 2005 that did not recur during 2006.
In our Americas division, operating income from continuing operations increased to $41.4 million in
2006 from $39.9 million in 2005. As a percent of revenue, operating income decreased 0.8 percentage
points. The increase in operating income in our Americas division was primarily due to the 21%
growth in revenue in our Americas division. The decrease in operating income as a percent of
revenue was due to an 18% increase in SG&A expenses compared to an increase in gross profit of only
10%. The increase in SG&A expenses in our Americas division was primarily due to increases in
personnel costs primarily in support of overall growth in unit volumes and our continued investment
in AWS. As discussed above, we modified and extended a logistic services agreement with a
significant customer in our North America business, which negatively impacted our profitability in
December 2006.
Operating income from continuing operations in our Asia-Pacific division decreased 7% to $17.6
million in 2006 from $18.9 million in 2005. As a percent of revenue, operating income decreased 0.2
percentage points. The decrease in operating income was due to a 22% increase in SG&A expenses
compared to an increase in gross profit of only 5%. The increase in SG&A expenses in our
Asia-Pacific division was due to incremental costs associated with our acquisition of Persequor as
well as incremental personnel costs in support of overall growth in volume in that division.
Incremental costs associated with our acquisition of Persequor include personnel costs for
information technology employees who have been working on global strategic information technology
initiatives.
Operating income from continuing operations in our Europe division increased to $11.4 million in
2006 from $4.6 million in 2005. As a percent of revenue, operating income increased 1.1 percentage
points. This increase was due to higher gross profit as a result of increased demand for and
availability of branded converged wireless devices as well as our entry into Russia during the
second quarter of 2006, partially offset by higher SG&A expenses.
Operating loss from continuing operations in our corporate headquarters increased $2.8 million to
$22.0 million in 2006. This increase was primarily due to the increase in non-cash stock based
compensation as discussed previously.
38
Interest
The components of interest, net are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
2,278 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net |
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
(146 |
) |
|
|
(479 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense includes interest on outstanding debt, fees paid for unused capacity on credit
lines and amortization of deferred financing fees. Interest expense was partially offset by
interest income from short-term investments. At December 31, 2006, we had $17.6 million of
borrowings outstanding on our lines of credit. The timing of payments to suppliers and collections
from customers causes our cash balances and borrowings to fluctuate throughout the year. In
addition, in certain subsidiaries, our local lenders restrict the use of intercompany funds that
can be used to pay down lines of credit. During 2006, the largest outstanding borrowings on a given
day were approximately $55.7 million, and average outstanding borrowings were approximately $21.5
million. There were no outstanding balances on lines of credit at December 31, 2005. During 2005,
the largest outstanding borrowings on a given day were approximately $36.3 million, and average
outstanding borrowings were approximately $14.0 million.
Other (Income) Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expenses |
|
$ |
(610 |
) |
|
$ |
1,523 |
|
|
|
(140 |
)% |
Percent of revenue |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% points |
The decrease in other expenses was primarily due to our decision to discontinue the sale of trade
receivables to third party financial institutions in Sweden and Norway and the corresponding
decrease in costs associated with the sale of those receivables. Other income for the year ended
December 31, 2006 was primarily attributable to foreign currency transaction gains.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
12,238 |
|
|
$ |
11,058 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% points |
Income tax expense for 2006 was $12.2 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 25.3% compared
to an effective tax rate of 25.7% for 2005. Our effective tax rate is typically lower than the
United States statutory tax rates primarily due to the benefit from foreign operations that have
lower statutory tax rates than the United States.
39
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
We use the indirect method of preparing and presenting our statements of cash flows. In our
opinion, it is more practical than the direct method and provides the reader with a good
perspective and analysis of the Companys cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
73,301 |
|
|
$ |
(49,917 |
) |
|
$ |
123,218 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(99,034 |
) |
|
|
(17,085 |
) |
|
|
(81,949 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
65,765 |
|
|
|
11,908 |
|
|
|
53,857 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,420 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
4,249 |
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
47,452 |
|
|
$ |
(51,923 |
) |
|
$ |
99,375 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities was $73.3 million in 2007, a change of $123.2 million
compared to prior year primarily due to:
|
|
|
$109.7 million less cash used for working capital in 2007 compared to the prior year.
Cash provided by working capital was $6.3 million for year ended December 31, 2007
primarily due to cash provided by working capital in our Asia-Pacific division. |
|
|
|
|
$13.5 million more cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating
assets and liabilities in 2007 compared to the prior year. |
A large customer within our Europe division experienced IT difficulties at the end of December,
resulting in $62.2 million of anticipated payments being delayed into the first quarter. This
payment was received on January 2, 2008. We do not expect similar payment delays due to IT
difficulties from this customer in the future. Had this payment been received in 2007, net cash
provided by operating activities would have been $135.5 million.
Net cash used for investing activities was $99.0 million for 2007, an increase of $81.9 million
compared to prior year primarily due to:
|
|
|
$67.5 million more cash used for acquisitions during 2007 compared to 2006 due primarily
to the acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities related to the
U.S. operations and the Miami-based Latin America business of CellStar Corporation. |
Net cash provided by financing activities was $65.8 million, a change of $53.9 million compared to
prior year primarily due to:
|
|
|
$152.7 million additional proceeds from credit facilities in 2007 compared to the prior
year. |
|
|
|
|
$250.0 million proceeds from the Global Term Loans |
|
|
|
|
$18.0 million less cash used for the purchase of treasury stock in 2007 compared to the
prior year. |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
$353.5 million cash used for repayments of long-term debt compared to the prior year
including $348.7 million of cash used for repayments of debt acquired through the
acquisition of Dangaard Telecom and $4.8 million of cash used for repayments of the Global
Term Loans. |
40
Cash Conversion Cycle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Days inventory on-hand |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Days payable outstanding |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Conversion Cycle Days (1) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our calculation of the cash conversion cycle has not been adjusted to include pro-forma
results of operations for the U.S. operations and the Miami-based Latin America business of
CellStar Corporation and pro-forma results of operations for Dangaard Telecom as described in
Note 3 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, our cash conversion
cycle days are higher primarily due to the fact that daily sales and cost of products sold do
not include a full year of sales and cost of products sold for these acquisitions. |
A key source of our liquidity is our ability to invest in inventory, sell the inventory to our
customers, collect cash from our customers and pay our suppliers. We refer to this as the cash
conversion cycle. The cash conversion cycle is measured by the number of days it takes to effect
the cycle of investing in inventory, selling the inventory, paying suppliers and collecting cash
from customers. The components in the cash conversion cycle are days sales outstanding in accounts
receivable, days inventory on hand, and days payables outstanding. The cash conversion cycle, as we
measure it, is the netting of days sales outstanding in accounts receivable and days inventory on
hand with the days of payable outstanding. Circumstances when the cash conversion cycle decreases
generally generate cash for the Company. Conversely, circumstances when the cash conversion cycle
increases generally consume cash in the form of additional investment in working capital.
During 2007, the cash conversion cycle increased to 42 days from 25 days in 2006. The increase in
the cash conversion cycle was the primarily due to the Dangaard Telecom acquisition.
The detail calculation of the components of the cash conversion cycle is as follows:
(A) Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable = Ending accounts receivable for continuing
operations divided by average daily revenue (inclusive of value-added taxes for foreign
operations) for the period.
(B) Days inventory on-hand = Ending inventory for continuing operations divided by average daily
cost of revenue (excluding indirect product and service costs) for the period.
(C) Days payables outstanding = Ending accounts payable for continuing operations divided by
average daily cost of revenue (excluding indirect product and service costs) for the period.
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations revenue |
|
$ |
4,300,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,140,177 |
|
Value-added taxes invoiced for continuing operations |
|
|
217,749 |
|
|
|
123,916 |
|
|
|
110,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total continuing operations revenue and value-added taxes |
|
$ |
4,518,024 |
|
|
$ |
2,549,289 |
|
|
$ |
2,250,884 |
|
Daily sales including value-added taxes |
|
|
12,550 |
|
|
|
7,081 |
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
Continuing operations ending accounts receivable |
|
$ |
751,146 |
|
|
$ |
228,186 |
|
|
$ |
168,004 |
|
Agency accounts receivable |
|
|
(111,409 |
) |
|
|
(29,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable excluding agency receivables |
|
$ |
639,737 |
|
|
$ |
198,679 |
|
|
$ |
168,004 |
|
Days sales outstanding in accounts receivable(A) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days inventory on-hand: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations cost of revenue |
|
$ |
4,029,689 |
|
|
$ |
2,274,467 |
|
|
$ |
2,008,165 |
|
Indirect product and service costs |
|
|
(212,902 |
) |
|
|
(169,520 |
) |
|
|
(126,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total continuing operations cost of products sold |
|
$ |
3,816,787 |
|
|
$ |
2,104,947 |
|
|
$ |
1,881,465 |
|
Daily cost of products sold |
|
|
10,602 |
|
|
|
5,847 |
|
|
|
5,226 |
|
Continuing operations ending inventory |
|
$ |
474,951 |
|
|
$ |
391,657 |
|
|
$ |
124,864 |
|
Agency inventory |
|
|
(36,514 |
) |
|
|
(2,606 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory excluding agency inventory |
|
$ |
438,437 |
|
|
$ |
389,051 |
|
|
$ |
124,864 |
|
Days inventory on-hand(B) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days payables outstanding in accounts payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily cost of products sold |
|
$ |
10,602 |
|
|
$ |
5,847 |
|
|
$ |
5,226 |
|
Continuing operations ending accounts payable |
|
$ |
664,484 |
|
|
$ |
454,546 |
|
|
$ |
232,249 |
|
Agency accounts payable |
|
|
(136,117 |
) |
|
|
(46,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable excluding agency payables |
|
$ |
528,367 |
|
|
$ |
407,693 |
|
|
$ |
232,249 |
|
Days payable outstanding(C) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion cycle days (A+B-C) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Agency accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable represent amounts on our balance
sheet that include the full value of the product for which the revenue associated with these
transactions is recorded under the net method (excluding the value of the product sold). |
Borrowings
The table below summarizes borrowing capacity that was available to the Company as of December 31,
2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of Credit & |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Availability |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Guarantees |
|
|
Availability |
|
|
|
|
Global Term Loans |
|
$ |
252,454 |
|
|
$ |
252,454 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Global Credit Facility |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
208,399 |
|
|
|
23,288 |
|
|
|
68,313 |
|
Other |
|
|
62,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,122 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
614,576 |
|
|
$ |
460,853 |
|
|
$ |
23,288 |
|
|
$ |
130,435 |
|
|
|
|
As noted above, in conjunction with the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom we obtained additional
financing in the current year including: (i) an increase in the amount available under our secured
revolving credit facility to $300.0 million, (ii) the extension to the domestic borrowers of our
credit agreement of a term loan in an original principal amount of $125.0 million, (iii) the
extension to the foreign borrowers of our credit agreement, a term loan in an original principal
amount equivalent to $125.0 million (denominated in Euros).
42
Liquidity analysis
We measure liquidity as the total of unrestricted cash and unused borrowing availability, and we
use this measurement as an indicator of how much access to cash we have to either grow the business
through investment in new markets, acquisitions, or through expansion of existing service or
product lines or to contend with adversity such as unforeseen operating losses potentially caused
by reduced demand for our products and services, material uncollectible accounts receivable, or
material inventory write-downs, as examples. The table below shows our liquidity calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
% Change |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash |
|
$ |
101,582 |
|
|
$ |
54,130 |
|
|
|
88 |
% |
Unused borrowing availability |
|
|
130,435 |
|
|
|
75,704 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
$ |
232,017 |
|
|
$ |
129,834 |
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
|
A large customer within our Europe division experienced IT difficulties at the end of December,
resulting in $62.2 million of anticipated payments being delayed into the first quarter. This
payment was received on January 2, 2008. This cash payment was used to pay down borrowings on our
lines of credit. We do not expect similar payment delays due to IT difficulties from this customer
in the future. Had these payments been received in 2007, our unused borrowing availability would
have been $192.6 million.
Capital expenditures were $20.2 million, $20.8 million and $12.6 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005.
Capital expenditures were primarily related to investments in our information technology
infrastructure and software upgrades as well as equipment and leasehold improvements for new
facilities, particularly in the U.S. Expenditures for capital resources historically have been
composed of information systems, leasehold improvements and warehouse equipment. We expect this
pattern to continue in future periods. We expect to invest in a range of $28.0 million to $33.0
million in 2008. A key component of our strategic plan is geographic expansion. We expect our level
of capital expenditures to be affected by our geographic expansion activity.
We believe that existing capital resources and cash flows provided by future operations will enable
us to maintain our current level of operations and our planned operations including capital
expenditures for the foreseeable future. We believe that our current liquidity is sufficient to
operate the business successfully for the next twelve months and to invest in growth opportunities.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have agreements with unrelated third-parties for the factoring of specific accounts receivable
in our Spain and Germany operations acquired in the purchase of Dangaard Telecom in order to reduce
the amount of working capital required to fund such receivables. The factoring of accounts
receivable under these agreements are accounted for as sales in accordance with SFAS 140, Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, and accordingly, are
accounted for as off-balance sheet arrangements. Proceeds on the transfer reflect the face value of
the account less a discount. The discount is recorded as a charge in Interest, net in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period of the sale.
Net funds received reduced accounts receivable outstanding while increasing cash. We are the
collection agent on behalf of the third parties for these arrangements and have no significant
retained interests or servicing liabilities related to the accounts receivable that we have sold.
At December 31, 2007, we had sold $73.0 million of accounts receivable, which represents the face
amount of total outstanding receivables at that date. Fees paid under this program were $0.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
43
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
Our disclosures regarding cash requirements of contractual obligations and commercial commitments
are located in various parts of our regulatory filings. Information in the following table provides
a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
(Amounts in 000s) |
Operating leases |
|
$ |
116,894 |
|
|
$ |
20,783 |
|
|
$ |
32,286 |
|
|
$ |
22,526 |
|
|
$ |
41,299 |
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
460,853 |
|
|
|
19,332 |
|
|
|
77,715 |
|
|
|
363,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on third party debt and lines of credit (1) |
|
|
123,262 |
|
|
|
30,796 |
|
|
|
55,426 |
|
|
|
37,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(2) |
|
|
15,840 |
|
|
|
15,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension obligation |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,304 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
23,288 |
|
|
|
23,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
742,441 |
|
|
$ |
110,039 |
|
|
$ |
165,427 |
|
|
$ |
423,372 |
|
|
$ |
43,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest on third party debt is calculated based on the interest rate as of December 31, 2007
and repayments of outstanding debt in accordance with our credit agreement. Interest does not
include the effects of any prepayments of borrowings permitted under the credit agreement.
Prepayments could significantly decrease interest obligations in future years. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations exclude agreements that are cancelable without penalty. |
In addition to the amounts shown in the table above, $2.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits have
been recorded as liabilities in accordance with FIN 48, and we are uncertain as to if or when such
amounts may be settled.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities and related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and reported
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Some of those judgments can be
subjective and complex. Consequently, actual results could differ from those estimates. We
consider an accounting estimate to be critical if:
|
|
|
The accounting estimate requires us to make assumptions about matters that were
highly uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the estimate are reasonably likely to occur from period to period as new
information becomes available, or use of different estimates that we reasonably could
have used in the current period, would have a material impact on our financial
condition or results of operations. |
We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates we use to prepare the consolidated
financial statements. Our estimates are based on historical experience, information from
third-party professionals and various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable. Management has
discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit
Committee and the Audit Committee has reviewed the foregoing disclosure. In addition, there are
other items within our financial statements that require estimation, but are not deemed critical
based on the criteria above. Changes in estimates used in these and other items could have a
material impact on our financial statements in any one period.
Deferred Taxes and Effective Tax Rates
We estimate the effective tax rates and associated liabilities or assets for each legal entity in
accordance with SFAS 109. We use tax-planning to minimize or defer tax liabilities to future
periods. In recording effective tax rates and related liabilities and assets, we rely upon
estimates, which are based upon our interpretation of United States and local tax laws as they
apply to our legal entities and our overall tax structure. Audits by local tax jurisdictions,
including the United States Government, could yield different interpretations from our own and
cause the Company to owe more or less taxes than originally recorded. We utilize internal and
external skilled resources in the various tax jurisdictions to evaluate our position and to assist
in our calculation of tax expense and related liabilities.
44
For interim periods, we accrue our tax provision at the effective tax rate that we expect for the
full year. As the actual results from our various businesses vary from our estimates earlier in the
year, we adjust the succeeding interim periods effective tax rates to reflect our best estimate
for the year-to-date results and for the full year. As part of the effective tax rate, if we
determine that a deferred tax asset arising from temporary differences is not likely to be
utilized, we will establish a valuation allowance against that asset to record it at the expected
realizable value. At December 31, 2007, total deferred tax assets were $37.7 million, net of $8.7
million of valuation allowances.
Goodwill and Long-lived Asset Impairment
We assess goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently when indicators of impairment are
present. At December 31, 2007, we had $349.6 million of goodwill recorded as an asset. We perform
our annual impairment analysis during the fourth quarter, and based on our analysis performed in
2007, we determined that there was no impairment of the goodwill balance. In our impairment
analysis we estimate the fair value of an enterprise based on the present value of anticipated
future cash flows. We recognize an impairment loss to the extent the net assets of the enterprise
exceed the present value of anticipated future cash flows. As
permitted under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, our determination of the fair value of Dangaard Telecom
for use in our annual impairment analysis was carried forward from
the fair value used to determine the purchase price of Dangaard
Telecom.
We test our long-lived assets for impairment whenever there are indicators that the carrying value
of the assets may not be recoverable. For long-lived assets impairment testing, we determine
whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows attributable to the assets in question is
less than their carrying value. If less, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of
the carrying amount of the assets over their respective fair values. Fair value is determined by
discounted future cash flows, appraisals or other methods. If the assets determined to be impaired
are to be held and used, we recognize an impairment charge to the extent the present value of
anticipated net cash flows attributable to the asset are less than the assets carrying value. The
fair value of the asset then becomes the assets new carrying value, which we depreciate over the
remaining estimated useful life of the asset. At December 31, 2007, the carrying values of our
long-lived assets do not exceed their respective fair values, and there were no material impairment
charges in 2007 other than the restructuring charge described below.
As discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we decided to cease Dangaard
Telecoms implementation of SAP enterprise resource planning and related software. As part of that
decision, we determined that costs capitalized related to the project in the period after the
acquisition of Dangaard Telecom were impaired under SFAS 144. Accordingly, an impairment charge was
recorded in our Europe division and is included within Restructuring charge in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
CREDIT RATING
We are rated by Standard & Poors. As of December 31, 2007, our rating was BB- with a negative
outlook. An upgrade or downgrade in credit rating would not have an impact on our Credit Agreement,
however access to and pricing in capital markets could be impacted by a downgrade in our credit
rating.
45
SEASONALITY
We are subject to seasonal patterns that generally affect the wireless device industry. Wireless
devices are generally used by businesses, governments and consumers. For businesses and
governments, purchasing behavior is affected by fiscal year ends, while consumers are affected by
holiday gift-giving seasons. For the global wireless device industry, seasonal patterns for
wireless device units handled have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
1st Quarter |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
4th Quarter |
|
2007
|
|
23%
|
|
23%
|
|
25%
|
|
29% |
2006
|
|
22%
|
|
24%
|
|
25%
|
|
29% |
2005
|
|
21%
|
|
23%
|
|
26%
|
|
30% |
The seasonal patterns for wireless devices handled by us have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
1st Quarter |
|
2nd Quarter (1) |
|
3rd Quarter (1) |
|
4th Quarter (1) |
|
2007
|
|
18%
|
|
23%
|
|
27%
|
|
32% |
2006
|
|
23%
|
|
25%
|
|
24%
|
|
28% |
2005
|
|
18%
|
|
22%
|
|
26%
|
|
34% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our calculation of seasonality has not been adjusted to include pro-forma results of
operations for the U.S. operations and the Miami-based Latin America business of CellStar
Corporation and pro-forma results of operations for Dangaard Telecom as described in Note 3 in
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
46
FORWARD LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS
Certain information in this Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements regarding future
events or the future performance of the Company. These risk factors include, without limitation,
uncertainties relating to customer plans and commitments, including, without limitation, (i)
dependence upon principal suppliers and availability and price of wireless products including the
risk of consolidation of these suppliers; (ii) access to or the cost of increasing amounts of
capital, trade credit or other financing; (iii) the loss or reduction in orders from principal
customers or a reduction in prices we are able to charge to these customers (iv) possible adverse
effect on demand for our products resulting from consolidation of mobile operators; (v) investment
in and implementation of sophisticated information systems technologies and our reliance upon the
proper functioning of such systems; (vi) a substantial number of shares will be eligible for future
sale by Dangaard Holding and the sale of those shares could adversely affect our stock price; (vii)
our ability to borrow additional funds; (viii) possible difficulties collecting our accounts
receivable; (ix) our ability to increase volumes and maintain our margins; (x) our ability to
expand and implement our future growth strategy, including acquisitions; (xi) uncertainty whether
wireless equipment manufacturers and wireless network operators will continue to outsource aspects
of their business to us; (xii) our reliance upon third parties to manufacture products which we
distribute and reliance upon their quality control procedures; (xiii) our operations may be
materially affected by fluctuations in regional demand and economic factors; (xiv) our ability to
respond to rapid technological changes in the wireless communications and data industry; (xv) risks
of foreign operations, including currency, trade restrictions and political risks in our foreign
markets; (xvi) effect of natural disasters, epidemics, hostilities or terrorist attacks on our
operations; (xvii) our ability to meet intense industry competition; (xviii) our ability to manage
and sustain future growth at our historical or current rates; (xix) certain relationships and
financings, which may provide us with minimal returns or losses on our investments; (xx) the impact
that seasonality may have on our business and results; (xxi) our ability to attract and retain
qualified management and other personnel, cost of complying with labor agreements and high rate of
personnel turnover; (xxii) our ability to protect our proprietary information; (xxiii) our
significant payment obligations under certain debt, lease and other contractual arrangements and
our ability to reduce these obligations; (xxiv) the efficient operation of our computer and
communication systems; (xxv) uncertainty regarding future volatility in our Common Stock price;
(xxvi) the potential issuance of additional equity, including our Common Stock, which could result
in dilution of existing shareholders and may have an adverse impact on the price of our Common
Stock; (xxvii) existence of anti-takeover measures; (xxviii) loss of significant customers or a
reduction in prices we charge these customers; Dobson was recently acquired. In addition RCC and
SunCom have recently announced plans to be acquired. The completion of any of these acquisitions
may negatively impact our operating results. (xxix) we incurred significant financial obligations
as a result of the acquisitions of Dangaard Telecom and CellStar, and our inability to satisfy
these could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition and harm
our business; (xxx) possible adverse effects of future medical claims regarding the use of wireless
devices; (xxxi) if we are not able to integrate Dangaard Telecoms operations in a timely manner,
we may not realize anticipated benefits of the transaction in a timely fashion, or at all, and our
business could be harmed; (xxxii) exposure to unknown pre-existing liabilities of Dangaard Telecom
could cause us to incur substantial financial obligations and harm our business; (xxxiii)
acquisition related accounting impairment and amortization charges may delay and reduce our
post-acquisition profitability. Because of the aforementioned uncertainties affecting our future
operating results, past performance should not be considered to be a reliable indicator of future
performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate future results or trends.
The words believe, expect, anticipate, intend, and plan and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that such statement was made. We
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
47
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist
principally of cash investments, forward currency contracts and accounts receivable. We maintain
cash investments primarily in AAA rated money market mutual funds and overnight repurchase
agreements, which have minimal credit risk. We place forward currency contracts with high
credit-quality financial institutions in order to minimize credit risk exposure. Concentrations of
credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of
geographically dispersed customers. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers
financial condition and generally do not require collateral to secure accounts receivable. In many
circumstances, we have obtained credit insurance to mitigate our credit risk.
Exchange Rate Risk Management
A substantial portion of our revenue and expenses are transacted in markets worldwide and may be
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, our future results could be
adversely affected by a variety of factors, including changes in specific countries political,
economic or regulatory conditions and trade protection measures.
Our foreign currency risk management program is designed to reduce, but not eliminate,
unanticipated fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by volatility in currency exchange
rates by hedging. Generally, through the purchase of forward contracts, we hedge transactional
currency risk, but do not hedge foreign currency revenue or future operating income. Also, we do
not hedge our investment in foreign subsidiaries, where fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates may affect our comprehensive income or loss. An adverse change (defined as a 10%
strengthening of the U.S. dollar) in all exchange rates, relative to our foreign currency risk
management program, would have had no material impact on our results of operations for 2007 or
2006. At December 31, 2007, we had no cash flow or net investment hedges open. Our sensitivity
analysis of foreign currency exchange rate movements does not factor in a potential change in
volumes or local currency prices of our products sold or services provided. Actual results may
differ materially from those discussed above.
Interest Rate Risk Management
We are exposed to potential loss due to changes in interest rates. Investments with interest rate
risk include short-term marketable securities. Debt with interest rate risk includes the fixed and
variable rate debt. To mitigate interest rate risks, we utilize interest rate swaps to convert
certain portions of our variable rate debt to fixed interest rates.
We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with our borrowing arrangements. Our risk
management program seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects that market volatility may have
on interest expense. We use interest rate swaps to manage interest rate exposure. At December 31,
2007, swaps with a total notional amount of $65 million were outstanding. These swaps have maturity
dates ranging from 2009-2012. These derivative instruments are designated as hedges under SFAS 133.
Changes in market value, when effective, are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income
in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Amounts are recorded to interest expense as settled. A 10%
increase in short-term borrowing rates during the quarter would have resulted in only a nominal
increase in interest expense. The fair value liability associated with those swaps was $1.6 million
at December 31, 2007.
48
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of Brightpoint, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
|
50 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
51 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
52 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity |
|
|
53 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
54 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
79 |
|
49
Brightpoint, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution revenue |
|
$ |
3,942,095 |
|
|
$ |
2,097,510 |
|
|
$ |
1,845,983 |
|
Logistic services revenue |
|
|
358,180 |
|
|
|
327,863 |
|
|
|
294,194 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
4,300,275 |
|
|
|
2,425,373 |
|
|
|
2,140,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of distribution revenue |
|
|
3,775,165 |
|
|
|
2,015,736 |
|
|
|
1,774,612 |
|
Cost of logistic services revenue |
|
|
254,524 |
|
|
|
258,731 |
|
|
|
233,553 |
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
|
4,029,689 |
|
|
|
2,274,467 |
|
|
|
2,008,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
270,586 |
|
|
|
150,906 |
|
|
|
132,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
185,484 |
|
|
|
102,253 |
|
|
|
86,455 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
10,528 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
Restructuring charge (benefit) |
|
|
8,661 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
|
65,913 |
|
|
|
48,371 |
|
|
|
44,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net |
|
|
18,017 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
Other (income) expenses |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
47,506 |
|
|
|
48,428 |
|
|
|
42,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
12,238 |
|
|
|
11,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before minority interest |
|
|
47,066 |
|
|
|
36,190 |
|
|
|
31,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest, net of taxes |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
46,719 |
|
|
|
36,190 |
|
|
|
31,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(20,600 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(21,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
47,394 |
|
|
$ |
35,610 |
|
|
$ |
10,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.45 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
61,174 |
|
|
|
49,104 |
|
|
|
47,954 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
63,571 |
|
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
49,657 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
50
Brightpoint, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
101,582 |
|
|
$ |
54,130 |
|
Pledged cash |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful
accounts of $17,157 in 2007 and $4,926 in 2006) |
|
|
751,146 |
|
|
|
228,186 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
474,951 |
|
|
|
391,657 |
|
Contract financing receivable |
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
20,161 |
|
Contract financing inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,293 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
69,261 |
|
|
|
25,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,400,610 |
|
|
|
727,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
55,732 |
|
|
|
37,904 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
349,646 |
|
|
|
6,976 |
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
135,431 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
30,942 |
|
|
|
4,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,972,361 |
|
|
$ |
778,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
664,484 |
|
|
$ |
454,552 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
189,415 |
|
|
|
68,320 |
|
Contract financing payable |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
30,991 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
19,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
874,832 |
|
|
|
567,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit, long-term |
|
|
208,399 |
|
|
|
3,750 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
233,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
54,425 |
|
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
495,946 |
|
|
|
15,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,370,778 |
|
|
|
583,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 1,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000 shares
authorized; 88,418 issued in 2007
and 57,536 issued in 2006 |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
584,806 |
|
|
|
266,756 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 6,930 shares in 2007 and
6,891 shares in 2006 |
|
|
(58,695 |
) |
|
|
(58,295 |
) |
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
|
29,467 |
|
|
|
(17,918 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
44,303 |
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
600,765 |
|
|
|
194,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,972,361 |
|
|
$ |
778,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
51
Brightpoint, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
47,394 |
|
|
$ |
35,610 |
|
|
$ |
10,440 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,747 |
|
|
|
12,234 |
|
|
|
11,101 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
21,478 |
|
Net operating cash flows used in discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,085 |
) |
Pledged cash requirements |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
13,662 |
|
Non-cash compensation |
|
|
6,104 |
|
|
|
6,005 |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
Restructuring charge (benefit) |
|
|
8,661 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
933 |
|
Change in deferred taxes |
|
|
(25,625 |
) |
|
|
(3,020 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
Income tax benefits from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,377 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash |
|
|
6,459 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,041 |
|
|
|
53,511 |
|
|
|
63,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities,
net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(123,195 |
) |
|
|
(41,135 |
) |
|
|
(47,778 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
160,596 |
|
|
|
(258,070 |
) |
|
|
(23,656 |
) |
Other operating assets |
|
|
(7,156 |
) |
|
|
(1,542 |
) |
|
|
(6,183 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(23,985 |
) |
|
|
197,319 |
|
|
|
82,823 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
73,301 |
|
|
|
(49,917 |
) |
|
|
68,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(20,247 |
) |
|
|
(20,779 |
) |
|
|
(12,649 |
) |
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(68,902 |
) |
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
|
|
(413 |
) |
Net investing cash flow from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) contract financing arrangements |
|
|
(4,838 |
) |
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
(5,285 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
(5,047 |
) |
|
|
(1,853 |
) |
|
|
3,945 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(99,034 |
) |
|
|
(17,085 |
) |
|
|
(15,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from credit facilities |
|
|
168,493 |
|
|
|
15,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on debt assumed from Dangaard Telecom |
|
|
(348,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Global Term Loans |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on Global Term Loans |
|
|
(4,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs paid |
|
|
(4,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(18,367 |
) |
|
|
(15,918 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from equity based compensation |
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from common stock issuances under employee stock
option plans |
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
65,765 |
|
|
|
11,908 |
|
|
|
(11,168 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7,420 |
|
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
(8,360 |
) |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
47,452 |
|
|
|
(51,923 |
) |
|
|
33,933 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
54,130 |
|
|
|
106,053 |
|
|
|
72,120 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
101,582 |
|
|
$ |
54,130 |
|
|
$ |
106,053 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
52
Brightpoint, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued in connection with employee stock plans
and related income tax benefit |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued for purchase of Dangaard Telecom |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
266,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued in connection with employee stock plans
and related income tax benefit |
|
|
14,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued for purchase of Dangaard Telecom |
|
|
303,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
584,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (deficit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(17,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,968 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
47,394 |
|
|
$ |
47,394 |
|
|
|
35,610 |
|
|
$ |
35,610 |
|
|
|
10,440 |
|
|
$ |
10,440 |
|
Adjustment to adopt FASB Interpretation 48,
net of tax |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
29,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation of foreign investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,131 |
) |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
classified as available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to adopt Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards 158, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
40,593 |
|
|
|
40,593 |
|
|
|
8,548 |
|
|
|
8,548 |
|
|
|
(9,131 |
) |
|
|
(9,131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
44,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(58,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
(58,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,295 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,928 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned compensation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted stock unearned
compensation, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
$ |
600,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
194,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
149,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
53
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business
Brightpoint, Inc. (the Company) is a global leader in the distribution of wireless devices and
accessories and provision of customized logistic services to the wireless industry including
wireless network operators (also referred to as mobile operators), Mobile Virtual Network
Operators (MVNOs) and manufacturers with operations centers and/or sales offices in various
countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
Italy, India, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia,
Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Arab Emirates and the United States.
The Company provides integrated logistic services including procurement, inventory management,
software loading, kitting and customized packaging, fulfillment, credit services and receivables
management, call center and activation services, website hosting, e-fulfillment solutions and other
services within the global wireless industry. The Companys customers include mobile operators,
MVNOs, resellers, retailers and wireless equipment manufacturers. The Company distributes wireless
communication devices and provides value-added distribution and logistic services for wireless
products manufactured by companies such as High Tech Computer Corp., Kyocera, LG Electronics,
Motorola, Nokia, Samsung, Siemens, Sony Ericsson and UTStarcom.
The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana in August 1989 under the name
Wholesale Cellular USA, Inc. and reincorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in March
1994. In September 1995, the Company changed its name to Brightpoint, Inc. In June 2004, the
Company reincorporated under the laws of the State of Indiana under the name of Brightpoint, Inc.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all
of which are wholly-owned with the exception of the Moobi Norway A/S subsidiary that is 76% owned
by the Company. On July 31, 2007 the Company completed its acquisition of Dangaard Telecom. Results
of operations related to this acquisition are included in the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Operations beginning on August 1, 2007. See Note 3 for further
details regarding this acquisition. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities at the financial
statement date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an
on-going basis, the Company reviews its estimates and assumptions. The Companys estimates were
based on its historical experience and various other assumptions that the Company believes to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from those estimates under
different assumptions or conditions, but management does not believe such differences will
materially affect the Companys financial position or results of operations.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104, Revenue
Recognition. Revenue is recognized when the title and risk of loss have passed to the customer,
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been
rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. The
amount of revenue is determined based on either the gross method or the net method. The amount
under the gross method includes the value of the product sold while the amount under the net method
does not include the value of the product sold.
For distribution revenue, which is recorded using the gross method, the criteria of SAB 104 are
generally met upon shipment to customers, including title transfer; and therefore, revenue is
recognized at the time of shipment. In some circumstances, the customer may take legal title and
assume risk of loss upon delivery; and therefore, revenue is recognized on the delivery date. In
certain countries, title is retained by the Company for collection purposes only, which does not
impact the timing of
54
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
revenue recognition in accordance with the provisions of SAB 104. Sales are
recorded net of discounts, rebates, returns and
allowances. The Company does not have any material post-shipment obligations (e.g. customer
acceptance) or other arrangements.
A portion of the Companys sales involves shipments of products directly from its suppliers to its
customers. In such circumstances, the Company negotiates the price with the supplier and the
customer, assumes responsibility for the delivery of the product and, at times, takes the ownership
risk while the product is in transit, pays the supplier directly for the product shipped,
establishes payment terms and bears credit risk of collecting payment from its customers. In
addition, the Company bears responsibility for accepting returns of products from the customer in
these arrangements. Under these arrangements, the Company serves as the principal with the
customer, as defined by Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross
as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, and therefore recognizes the sale and cost of sale of the
product upon receiving notification from the supplier that the product has shipped or in cases of
FOB destination, CIP destination, or similar terms, the Company recognizes the sales upon
confirmation of delivery to the customer at the named destination.
For logistic services revenue, the criteria of SAB 104 are met when the Companys logistic services
have been performed and, therefore, revenue is recognized at that time. In general, logistic
services are fee-based services. The Company has certain arrangements for which it records
receivables, inventory and payables based on the gross amount of the transactions; however, the
Company records revenue for these logistic services at the amount of net margin because it is
acting as an agent for mobile operators as defined by EITF 99-19. The Company also records revenue
from the sale of prepaid airtime within logistic services. In certain circumstances, the Company
recognizes revenue for the sales of prepaid airtime using the gross method (based on the full sales
price of the airtime to its customers) because the Company has general inventory risk, latitude in
setting price and other gross reporting indicators as defined by EITF 99-19. If all of the
Companys prepaid airtime transactions that are currently recorded using the gross method were
accounted for using the net method, logistic services revenue would have been lower by $90.2
million, $121.7 million and $136.7 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005.
In other logistic services arrangements, the Company receives activation commissions for acquiring
subscribers on behalf of mobile operators through its independent dealer/agents. In the event
activation occurs through an independent dealer/agent, a portion of the commission is passed on to
the dealer/agent. These arrangements may contain provisions for additional residual commissions
based on subscriber usage. These agreements may also provide for the reduction or elimination of
activation commissions if subscribers deactivate service within stipulated periods. The Company
recognizes revenue for activation commissions upon activation of the subscribers service and
residual commissions when earned. An allowance is established for estimated wireless service
deactivations as a reduction of accounts receivable and revenues. In circumstances where the
Company is acting as an agent for mobile operators as defined by EITF 99-19, the Company recognizes
the revenue using the net method. Performance penalty clauses may be included in certain contracts
whereby the Company provides logistic services. In general, these penalties are in the form of
reduced per unit fees or a specific dollar amount. In the event the Company has incurred
performance penalties, revenues are reduced accordingly within each calendar month.
Gross Profit
The Company determines its gross profit as the difference between revenue and cost of revenue. Cost
of revenue includes the direct product costs and other costs such as freight, labor and rent
expense.
Vendor Programs
The Company has three major types of incentive arrangements with various suppliers: price
protection, volume incentive rebates, and marketing, training and promotional funds. The Company
follows EITF 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration
Received from a Vendor and EITF 03-10, Application of Issue No. 02-16 by Resellers to Sales
Incentives Offered to Consumers by Manufacturers, in accounting for vendor programs. To the extent
that the Company receives excess funds from suppliers for reimbursement of its costs, the Company
recognizes the excess as a liability due to the supplier, which is applied to future costs incurred
on behalf of the supplier.
|
|
Price protection: consideration is received from certain, but not all, suppliers in the
form of a credit memo based on market conditions as determined by the supplier. The amount is
determined based on the difference between original purchase price from the supplier and
revised list price from the supplier. The terms of the price protection varies by supplier and
product, but is typically less than one month from original date of purchase. This amount is
accrued as a reduction of trade accounts payable until a credit memo is received and applied
as a debit to the outstanding accounts |
55
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
payable. This same amount is either a reduction of inventory cost or is a reduction of cost of
sales for those wireless devices already sold.
|
|
Volume incentive rebates: consideration is received from certain suppliers when purchase or
sell-through targets are attained or exceeded within a specified time period. The amount of
rebate earned in any financial reporting period is accrued as a vendor receivable, which is
classified as a reduction of trade accounts payable. This same amount is either a reduction of
inventory cost or is a reduction of cost of sales for those devices already sold. In certain
markets, the amount of the rebate is determined based on actual volumes purchased for the
incentive period to date at the established rebate percentage without minimum volume purchase
requirements. In other markets, where the arrangement has a tiered rate structure for
increasing volumes, the rate of the rebate accrual is determined based on the actual volumes
purchased plus reasonable, predictable estimates of future volumes within the incentive
period. In the event the future volumes are not reasonably estimable, the Company records the
incentive at the conclusion of the rebate period or at the point in time when the volumes are
reasonably estimable. Upon expiration of the rebate period an adjustment is recognized through
inventory or cost of sales for devices already sold if there is any variance between estimated
rebate receivable and actual rebate earned. To the extent that the Company passes-through
rebates to its customers, the amount is recognized as a liability in the period that it is
probable and reasonably estimable. |
|
|
Marketing, training and promotional funds: consideration is received from certain suppliers
for cooperative arrangements related to market development, training and special promotions
agreed upon in advance. The amount received is generally in the form of a credit memo, which
is applied to trade accounts payable. The same amount is recorded as a current liability.
Expenditures made pursuant to the agreed upon activity reduce this liability. To the extent
that the Company incurs costs in excess of the established supplier fund, the Company
recognizes the amount as a selling expense. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased are
considered to be cash equivalents. Pledged cash represents cash reserved as collateral for letters
of credit issued by financial institutions on behalf of the Company or its subsidiaries and as
collateral for vendor credit.
Concentrations of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist
primarily of trade accounts receivable. These receivables are generated from product sales and
services provided to mobile operators, agents, resellers, dealers and retailers in the global
wireless industry and are dispersed throughout the world, including North America, Latin America,
Asia, the Pacific Rim and Europe. The Company performs periodic credit evaluations of its customers
and provides credit in the normal course of business to a large number of its customers. However,
consistent with industry practice, the Company does not generally require collateral from its
customers to secure trade accounts receivable.
In 2007, 2006 and 2005, Generation Next Group (formerly Computech), a customer of the Companys
Singapore operations (2007) and the Companys Brightpoint Asia Limited operations (2006 and 2005),
accounted for approximately 10%, 13% and 12% of the Companys total revenue and 29%, 29% and 23% of
the Asia-Pacific divisions revenue. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there were no amounts owed to
the Company from Generation Next Group. The loss or a significant reduction in business activities
by the Companys customers could have a material adverse affect on the Companys revenue and
results of operations.
The Company is primarily dependent upon wireless equipment manufacturers for its supply of wireless
voice and data equipment. Revenue from the sale of Nokia products represented approximately 38%,
47% and 52% of total revenue in 2007, 2006 and 2005. The Company is dependent on the ability of its
suppliers to provide an adequate supply of products on a timely basis and on favorable pricing
terms. The loss of certain principal suppliers or a significant reduction in product availability
from principal suppliers could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company also
relies on its suppliers to provide trade credit facilities and favorable payment terms to
adequately fund its on-going operations and product purchases. In certain circumstances, the
Company has issued cash-secured letters of credit on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries in
support of their vendor credit facilities. The payment terms received from the Companys suppliers
is dependent on several factors, including, but not limited to, the Companys payment history with
the supplier, the suppliers credit granting policies, contractual provisions, the Companys
overall credit rating as determined by various credit rating agencies, the Companys recent
operating results, financial position and cash flows and the suppliers ability to obtain credit
insurance on amounts that the Company owes them. Adverse changes in any of these factors, certain
of which may not be wholly in the Companys control, could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys operations. The Company believes
56
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
that its relationships with its suppliers are
satisfactory; however, it has periodically experienced inadequate supply of certain models from
certain wireless device manufacturers.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company evaluates the collectibility of its accounts receivable on an on-going basis. In
circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customers inability to meet its financial
obligations, the Company records a specific allowance against amounts due to reduce the net
recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably believes will be collected. For all
other customers, the Company recognizes allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of
time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and the Companys historical
experience. In certain circumstances, the Company has obtained credit insurance to mitigate its
credit risk.
Inventories
Inventories primarily consist of wireless devices and accessories and are stated at the lower of
cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Freight expense is capitalized for inventory held in
stock and expensed at the time the inventory is sold. At each balance sheet date, the Company
evaluates its ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence, considering any stock
balancing or rights of return that it may have with certain suppliers. This evaluation includes
analyses of sales levels by product and projections of future demand. The Company writes off
inventories that are considered obsolete. Remaining inventory balances are adjusted to approximate
the lower of cost or market. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had no
individually significant inventory valuation adjustments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts at December 31, 2007 and 2006, of cash and cash equivalents, pledged cash,
accounts receivable, contract financing receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued
expenses and contract financing payables approximate their fair values because of the short
maturity of those instruments. The carrying amount at December 31, 2007 and 2006 of the Companys
borrowings approximate their fair value because these borrowings bear interest at a variable
(market) rate.
The Company has $8.5 million of marketable securities classified as available-for-sale as of
December 31, 2007. During 2007, the Company acquired 470,000 shares representing 9.1% of the total
outstanding shares of common stock of Tessco Technologies Incorporated (Tessco). The shares were
purchased because the Company believed that the shares were currently undervalued in the
marketplace and represent an attractive investment opportunity. The shares have a fair value of
approximately $8.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and are included in Other current assets in
the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has approximately $1.2 million of unrealized gains
included as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity.
The Company enters into derivative instruments through purchase of forward contracts to reduce, not
eliminate, unanticipated fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by volatility in currency
exchange rates. The Company also enters into derivative instruments through purchase of forward
contracts to pay vendors who invoice the Company in a non-functional currency. The fair value of
these instruments is reported as a current asset or current liability in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. These derivative instruments are not designated as hedges under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities; and
therefore, changes in fair value of these instruments are included as a component of Other
(income) expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk associated with its borrowing arrangements. The
Companys risk management program seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effects that market
volatility may have on interest expense. The Company uses interest rate swaps to manage interest
rate exposure. At December 31, 2007, swaps with a total notional amount of $65.0 million were
outstanding. These swaps have maturity dates ranging from 2009-2012. These derivative instruments
are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. Changes in market value, when effective, are
recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Amounts are recorded to interest expense as settled. A 10% increase in short-term borrowing rates
during the quarter would have resulted in an immaterial increase in interest expense. The fair
value liability associated with those swaps was $1.6 million at December 31, 2007 and is included
as a component of Other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has
approximately $1.6
57
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
million of unrealized losses included as a component of Accumulated other
comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholders Equity.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciation is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three to seven years. Leasehold
improvements are stated at cost and depreciated ratably
over the shorter of the lease term of the associated property or the estimated life of the
leasehold improvement. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Impairment of Long-Lived Tangible and Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
The Company follows the principles of SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets. The Company periodically considers whether indicators of impairment of
long-lived tangible and finite-lived intangible assets are present. If such indicators are present,
the Company determines whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows attributable to the
assets in question is less than their carrying value. If less, the Company recognizes an impairment
loss based on the excess of the carrying amount of the assets over their respective fair values.
Fair value is determined by discounted future cash flows, appraisals or other methods. If the
assets determined to be impaired are to be held and used, the Company recognizes an impairment
charge to the extent the assets carrying value is greater than the present value of anticipated
future cash flows attributable to the asset. The fair value of the asset then becomes the assets
new carrying value, which, if applicable, the Company depreciates or amortizes over the remaining
estimated useful life of the asset. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the finite-lived intangible
assets total $135.4 million and $1.2 million, net of accumulated amortization of $12.2 million and
$1.5 million and are currently being amortized over three to fifteen years. See Note 3 for further
discussion regarding the finite-lived intangible assets acquired during 2007. For the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company incurred no impairment charges for these long-lived
tangible and finite-lived intangible assets. The following sets forth amortization expense for
finite-lived intangible assets the Company expects to recognize over the next five years (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
17,617 |
|
2009 |
|
|
16,169 |
|
2010 |
|
|
15,898 |
|
2011 |
|
|
14,993 |
|
2012 |
|
|
11,712 |
|
As discussed in Note 3, the Company decided to cease Dangaard Telecoms implementation of SAP
enterprise resource planning and related software. As part of that decision, the Company determined
that costs capitalized related to the project in the period after the acquisition of Dangaard
Telecom were impaired under SFAS 144. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $7.1 million was
recorded in the Companys Europe division and is included within Restructuring charges in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately
$2.3 million to write-down certain intangible assets in connection with the Companys decision to
sell its operations in France. This impairment charge is included as a component of Loss from
discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Goodwill
The Company follows the principles of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill is
not amortized but rather tested annually for impairment. In the third quarter of 2005, the Company
recorded an impairment charge of approximately $11.5 million as a result of its decision to sell
its operations in France. This impairment charge is included as a component of Loss from
discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. In the fourth quarter of
2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company performed the required annual impairment test on its goodwill and
incurred no additional impairment charges. The Companys reporting units are contained within
three geographic segments, the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific as defined under SFAS 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Based on the fact that each
reporting unit constitutes a business, has discrete financial information with similar economic
characteristics, and the operating results of the component are regularly reviewed by management,
the Company applies the provisions of SFAS 142 and performs the necessary goodwill impairment tests
at the reporting unit level. As
permitted under SFAS 142, the Companys determination of the fair value of Dangaard Telecom
for use in its annual impairment analysis was carried forward from
the fair value used to determine the purchase price of Dangaard
Telecom, as discussed in Note 3.
58
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the year ended December
31, 2007, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
Europe |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,796 |
|
|
$ |
1,671 |
|
|
$ |
5,647 |
|
Goodwill from acquisitions |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611 |
|
Effects of foreign currency fluctuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
611 |
|
|
$ |
4,584 |
|
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
|
$ |
6,976 |
|
Goodwill from acquisitions |
|
|
48,522 |
|
|
|
269,459 |
|
|
|
3,394 |
|
|
|
321,375 |
|
Effects of foreign currency fluctuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,101 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
21,295 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
49,133 |
|
|
$ |
295,144 |
|
|
$ |
5,369 |
|
|
$ |
349,646 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency for most of the Companys foreign subsidiaries is the respective local
currency. Revenue and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the U.S. dollar
at average exchange rates in effect during the period, and assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies are translated to the U.S. dollar at the exchange rate in effect at the end of
the period. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as a component of Other (income) expenses. Currency translation of
assets and liabilities (foreign investments) from the functional currency to the U.S. dollar are
included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive
income in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequence of
events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or income tax returns.
Income taxes are recognized during the year in which the underlying transactions are reflected in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Deferred taxes are provided for temporary differences
between amounts of assets and liabilities as recorded for financial reporting purposes and amounts
recorded for tax purposes. After determining the total amount of deferred tax assets, the Company
determines whether it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized. If the Company determines that a deferred tax asset is not likely to be realized, a
valuation allowance will be established against that asset to record it at its expected realizable
value. The Company recognizes uncertain tax positions when it is more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained upon examination by relevant taxing authorities, based on the technical
merits of the position. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is
greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during each period, and diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of
common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during each period. Per share
amounts for all periods presented in this report have been adjusted to reflect the 6 for 5 common
stock split effected in the form of a stock dividend paid on May 31, 2006 and the 3 for 2 common
stock splits effected in the form of stock dividends paid on September 30, 2005 and December 30,
2005. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per share computations (in thousands, except per share data):
59
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
46,719 |
|
|
$ |
36,190 |
|
|
$ |
31,918 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(21,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
47,394 |
|
|
$ |
35,610 |
|
|
$ |
10,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share |
|
|
61,174 |
|
|
|
49,104 |
|
|
|
47,954 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options, restricted stock units, shares held in
escrow, and restricted stock based on the treasury stock method using
average market price |
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
63,571 |
|
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
49,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007, approximately 0.2 million stock options and restricted stock units were
excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share because the effect of including these
shares would have been anti-dilutive to diluted earnings per share.
The Company excluded 3,000,000 shares held in escrow issued in connection with the purchase of
Dangaard Telecom from the weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share until
the end of the escrow period as required under the treasury stock method. The weighted average
impact of the 3,000,000 shares held in escrow is included reconciliation to the calculation of
weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R). This statement amends SFAS 141, Business
Combinations, and provides revised guidance for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets and
goodwill acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. It also
provides disclosure requirements to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature
and financial effects of the business combination. The provisions of SFAS 141(R) are effective for
the Company on January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 141(R) to have a
material impact on its financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. The provisions of SFAS 160 are effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. Based on
the conditions that existed as of December 31, 2007, the Company does not expect the adoption of
SFAS 160 to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS 159, the Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. SFAS 159 expands the use of fair value accounting, but does not affect existing
standards which require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a
company may elect to use fair value to measure financial instruments and certain other items, which
may reduce the need to apply complex hedge accounting provisions in order to mitigate volatility in
reported earnings. The fair value election is irrevocable and is generally made on an
instrument-by-instrument basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to
measure based on fair value. At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on existing items
for which fair value has been elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained
earnings. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 159, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings.
The provisions of SFAS
60
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
159 are effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. Based on the
conditions that existed as of December 31, 2007, the Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS
159 to have a material impact on its financial statements.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 157, Fair Value
Measurements. This Statement defines fair value and provides guidance for how to measure fair
value. SFAS 157 applies to assets and liabilities required or permitted to be measured at fair
value under other accounting pronouncements; however, this Statement does not provide guidance
whether assets and liabilities are required or permitted to be measured at fair value. The
provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for the Company on January 1, 2008 for financial assets and
liabilities and January 1, 2009 for non-financial assets and liabilities. Based on the conditions
that existed as of December 31, 2007, the Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have
a material impact on its financial statements.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires the recognition of a tax position when
it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by relevant
taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company adopted the
provisions of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of this statement did not have a
material impact on its financial statements.
Operating Segments
The Company has operations centers and/or sales offices in various countries including Australia,
Austria, Belgium, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, the Netherlands, New
Zealand, Norway, the Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, United Arab Emirates and the United States. All
of the Companys operating entities generate revenue from the distribution of wireless devices and
accessories and/or the provision of logistic services. The Company identifies its reportable
segments based on management responsibility of its three geographic divisions: the Americas,
Asia-Pacific and Europe. The Companys operating segments have been aggregated into these three
geographic reporting segments.
The Company evaluates the performance of and allocates resources to these segments based on
operating income from continuing operations (excluding corporate selling, general and
administrative expenses and other unallocated expenses). Previously, the Companys measurement of
segment profit included allocated corporate selling, general and administrative expenses. Segment
information for prior periods has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. A
summary of the Companys operations by segment is presented below (in thousands) for 2007, 2006 and
2005:
61
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
Europe |
|
Reconciling Items |
|
Total |
|
|
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution revenue |
|
$ |
960,405 |
|
|
$ |
1,521,684 |
|
|
$ |
1,460,006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,942,095 |
|
Logistic services revenue |
|
|
195,028 |
|
|
|
36,445 |
|
|
|
126,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358,180 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
1,155,433 |
|
|
$ |
1,558,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,586,713 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,300,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
43,710 |
|
|
$ |
27,960 |
|
|
$ |
21,257 |
|
|
$ |
(27,014 |
) |
|
$ |
65,913 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,236 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
|
|
10,936 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
24,747 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
10,937 |
|
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
6,132 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
20,247 |
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
354,910 |
|
|
|
243,084 |
|
|
|
1,343,621 |
|
|
|
30,746 |
|
|
|
1,972,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution revenue |
|
$ |
612,386 |
|
|
$ |
1,088,247 |
|
|
$ |
396,877 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,097,510 |
|
Logistic services revenue |
|
|
202,202 |
|
|
|
27,487 |
|
|
|
98,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327,863 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
814,588 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,734 |
|
|
$ |
495,051 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
41,377 |
|
|
$ |
17,564 |
|
|
$ |
11,391 |
|
|
$ |
(21,961 |
) |
|
$ |
48,371 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,581 |
|
|
|
2,487 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
12,234 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
16,873 |
|
|
|
2,662 |
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
20,779 |
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
226,634 |
|
|
|
379,129 |
|
|
|
162,598 |
|
|
|
9,992 |
|
|
|
778,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution revenue |
|
$ |
507,508 |
|
|
$ |
1,054,051 |
|
|
$ |
284,424 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,845,983 |
|
Logistic services revenue |
|
|
167,566 |
|
|
|
27,478 |
|
|
|
99,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,194 |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
675,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,081,529 |
|
|
$ |
383,574 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,140,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
39,921 |
|
|
$ |
18,939 |
|
|
$ |
4,634 |
|
|
$ |
(19,141 |
) |
|
$ |
44,353 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,961 |
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
11,101 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
12,649 |
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
192,206 |
|
|
|
172,414 |
|
|
|
103,802 |
|
|
|
19,402 |
|
|
|
487,824 |
|
Information about Geographic Areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
1,114,040 |
|
|
$ |
790,137 |
|
|
$ |
649,154 |
|
Other (2) |
|
|
41,393 |
|
|
|
24,451 |
|
|
|
25,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Americas |
|
$ |
1,155,433 |
|
|
$ |
814,588 |
|
|
$ |
675,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Arab Emirates |
|
$ |
26,866 |
|
|
$ |
618,507 |
|
|
$ |
553,402 |
|
Singapore |
|
|
939,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (2) |
|
|
591,813 |
|
|
|
497,227 |
|
|
|
528,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Asia-Pacific |
|
$ |
1,558,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,734 |
|
|
$ |
1,081,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe |
|
$ |
1,586,713 |
|
|
$ |
495,051 |
|
|
$ |
383,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,300,275 |
|
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,140,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenues are attributable to country based on selling location. |
|
(2) |
|
Other represents geographic areas that are individually less than 10% of the total
revenue for a reportable segment. |
62
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets (1) |
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
31,868 |
|
|
$ |
29,657 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,864 |
|
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,732 |
|
|
$ |
37,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation. |
2. Stock Based Compensation
On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value provisions of SFAS 123(R), Share-Based
Payment, using the modified prospective transition method. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company
used the intrinsic value method provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related Interpretations to account for stock based
compensation. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if
the Company had applied the fair value recognition provision of SFAS 123 for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
10,440 |
|
Add back; stock compensation included in net income |
|
|
1,746 |
|
Stock-based employee compensation costs, net of related tax effects,
that would have been included in the determination of net income
if the fair value method had been applied |
|
|
(3,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
8,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Add back; stock compensation included in net income |
|
|
0.04 |
|
Stock-based employee compensation costs, net of related tax effects,
that would have been included in the determination of net income
if the fair value method had been applied |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Add back; stock compensation included in net income |
|
|
0.04 |
|
Stock-based employee compensation costs, net of related tax effects,
that would have been included in the determination of net income
if the fair value method had been applied |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has equity compensation plans, which reserve shares of common stock for issuance to
executives, key employees, directors and others.
Amended 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan
During 2004, the Companys shareholders approved the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTI Plan)
whereby officers, other key employees of the Company and others are eligible to be granted
non-qualified incentive stock options, performance units, restricted stock, other stock-based
awards, and/or cash awards. No participant may be granted under the LTI Plan, during any year,
options or any other awards relating to more than 2.0 million shares of common stock in the
aggregate. During 2007, the Companys shareholders approved an amendment to the LTI Plan which
removed a limitation on the number of shares that are subject to non-option awards. Previously, the
LTI Plan limited the number of shares that can be the subject of non-option based awards under the
plan to 2.0 million shares. There are 4.1 million common shares reserved for issuance under
63
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
the LTI
Plan, of which approximately 2.6 million and 3.0 million were authorized but unissued at December
31, 2007 and 2006. Under this LTI Plan, 1.5 million shares remain available for grant as of
December 31, 2007.
For the above plans, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors
determines the time(s) at which the grants will be awarded, selects the officers or other
recipients of awards and determines the number of shares covered by each grant, as well as, the
purchase price, time of exercise of options (not to exceed ten years from the date of the grant)
and other terms and conditions. The Board of Directors has delegated authority to the Companys
Chief Executive Officer to grant up to approximately 0.6 million of awards to non-officer employees
per calendar year.
Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock Compensation Plan
During 2004, the Companys shareholders approved an Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock
Compensation Plan (the Director Stock Compensation Plan), pursuant to which 2.4 million shares of
common stock are reserved for issuance to non-employee directors, of which approximately 2.2 were
authorized but unissued at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The Director Stock Compensation Plan
provides for Initial Awards, consisting of restricted shares of the Companys common stock granted
to an Independent Director when he or she joins the Board; Annual Awards, consisting of up to an
aggregate of 5,400 restricted shares of the Companys common stock granted to all Independent
Directors on an annual basis; and Elective Awards, consisting of an award of restricted shares of
the Companys common stock equal to a percentage of the Independent Directors board compensation,
which are paid in June and December of each year.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Companys Corporate Governance Principles were amended by unanimous
written consent of the Board of Directors of the Company to eliminate the previous requirement that
50% of each Independent Directors annual compensation be paid in common stock unless a threshold
amount of share holdings equal to 200% of annual Board compensation
has already been attained.
Accordingly, the directors fees will be paid entirely in the form of an annual cash retainer
beginning in 2008.
Stock Options
The exercise price of stock options granted under the LTI Plan may not be less than the fair market
value of a share of common stock on the date of the grant. Options generally become exercisable in
periods ranging from one to three years after the date of the grant. For the year ended December
31, 2007, the Company granted 73,745 stock options with a weighted average fair value of $4.75:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Value as of |
|
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Life |
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
1,220,492 |
|
|
$ |
6.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
73,745 |
|
|
|
11.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(706,902 |
) |
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
7.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31 |
|
|
583,550 |
|
|
$ |
7.70 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
4,468,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31 |
|
|
250,249 |
|
|
$ |
6.87 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
2,125,295 |
|
64
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes information about the fixed price stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Number |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at |
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Outstanding at |
|
Average |
Range of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
December 31, |
|
Exercise |
Exercise Prices |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
Life |
|
Price |
|
2007 |
|
Price |
|
$ |
2.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
48,136 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
years |
|
$ |
4.87 |
|
|
|
48,136 |
|
|
$ |
4.87 |
|
$ |
6.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
198,118 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
years |
|
|
6.78 |
|
|
|
101,912 |
|
|
|
6.78 |
|
$ |
7.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
|
|
years |
|
|
7.08 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
|
$ |
7.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
212,400 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
years |
|
|
7.48 |
|
|
|
63,900 |
|
|
|
7.48 |
|
$ |
8.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
119,646 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
years |
|
|
10.78 |
|
|
|
33,301 |
|
|
|
8.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.70 |
|
|
|
250,249 |
|
|
$ |
6.87 |
|
The per-share weighted average fair value of stock options granted in 2005 was $4.17. The Company
did not grant stock options under its equity compensation plans during 2006. The fair value was
estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3.86 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
Expected life of the options (years) |
|
|
3.26 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
For the year ended December 31 2007, the Company granted 416,496 shares of restricted stock units
with a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.99 per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Stock |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Value as of |
|
|
Units |
|
Price |
|
Life |
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
612,130 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
416,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Released |
|
|
(127,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at December 31 |
|
|
901,424 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1.43 |
|
|
$ |
13,845,843 |
|
During 2007, the Company also granted 51,513 shares of restricted stock awards at a weighted
average grant date fair value of $13.73 per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Grant |
|
Remaining |
|
|
Stock |
|
Date |
|
Contractual |
|
|
Awards |
|
Fair Value |
|
Life |
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
1,248,158 |
|
|
$ |
9.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
51,513 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Released |
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
23.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5,577 |
) |
|
|
13.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31 |
|
|
1,279,094 |
|
|
$ |
9.31 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
The weighted average fair value of restricted stock units granted during 2006 and 2005 was $19.94
and $8.29 per share.
The weighted average fair value of restricted stock awards granted during 2006 and 2005 was $21.06
and $7.52 per share.
The Company typically grants performance based equity awards during the first quarter of the fiscal
year. A portion of the restricted stock units granted are subject to forfeiture if certain
performance goals are not achieved. Those restricted stock
65
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
units no longer subject to forfeiture
typically vest in three equal annual installments beginning with the first anniversary of the
grant.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised and restricted stock released (vested) during 2007,
2006 and 2005 was $7.5 million, $25.0 million and $20.4 million. As of December 31, 2007, total
compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was $14.3 million of which
approximately one-third will be recognized in each of the next three fiscal years. In addition, the
Company will recognize compensation expense for any new awards granted subsequent to December 31,
2007.
3. Acquisitions
On March 30, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of certain assets and the assumption of
certain liabilities related to the U.S. operations and the Miami-based Latin America business of
CellStar Corporation for $67.5 million (including direct acquisition costs). Results of operations
related to this acquisition have been included in the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Operations beginning in the second quarter of 2007.
On July 31, 2007, the Company completed its acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding
capital stock of Dangaard Telecom, a Danish company from Dangaard Holding A/S (Dangaard Holding), a
Danish company for a purchase price of (i) $100,000 in cash and (ii) 30,000,000 shares of the
Companys unregistered common stock (including 3,000,000 shares held in escrow). In addition, the
Company assumed approximately $348.7 million of Dangaard Telecoms indebtedness. The acquisition of
Dangaard Telecom expanded the Companys existing European operations as Dangaard Telecom was the
leading distributor of wireless devices and accessories in Europe.
The purchase price for the Dangaard Telecom acquisition was $311.1 million (including direct
acquisition costs). The fair value of the Companys common stock was measured in accordance with
EITF 99-12, Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities
Issued in a Purchase Business Combination. Total equity consideration was estimated using a stock
price of $11.25 per share, which represents the average closing stock price beginning two trading
days before and ending two trading days after February 20, 2007, the date of the public
announcement of the definitive purchase agreement. The allocation of the purchase price is based
upon preliminary estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Results of
operations related to this acquisition are included in the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Operations beginning on August 1, 2007.
The Company is in the process of finalizing its valuation of certain assets and liabilities of
Dangaard Telecom primarily related to the determination of amounts that will be paid in connection
with consolidating certain facilities. Prior to the completion of the acquisition of Dangaard
Telecom, Company management began formulating a plan to exit certain activities of the combined
company. Components of this preliminary plan included terminating Dangaard Telecoms implementation
of SAP enterprise resource planning (ERP) and related software and consolidating certain
facilities. As Company management finalizes the plan, additional liabilities may result primarily
related to involuntary employee termination costs and costs to exit certain facilities in our
Europe operations. These additional liabilities will be recognized as liabilities assumed in the
business combination and included in the allocation of the acquisition costs in accordance with
EITF 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchased Business Combination. A plan
is expected to be completed by the first quarter of 2008. Adjustments to the purchase price
allocation under the preliminary plan resulted in reductions of assets acquired of $16.7 million
and additional liabilities assumed of $2.7 million. In the process of finalizing its valuation, the
Company excluded the fair value of the 3,000,000 shares held in escrow from the total purchase
price as the Company believes there is a more than remote possibility that some or all of the
shares will be returned.
The Dangaard Telecom assets acquired included $123.1 million of finite-lived intangible assets
assigned to the customer relationships. The preparation of the valuation of finite-lived intangible
assets required the use of significant assumptions and estimates. Critical estimates included, but
were not limited to future expected cash flows and the applicable discount rates as of the date of
the acquisition. These estimates were based on assumptions that the Company believed to be
reasonable as of the date of acquisition; however, actual results may differ from these estimates.
The acquired finite-lived intangible assets have a useful life of approximately fifteen years and
are being amortized over the period that the assets are expected to contribute to the future cash
flows of the Company. The finite-lived intangible assets are being amortized on an accelerated
method based on the projected cash flows used for valuation purposes. As a result of applying this
accelerated method of amortization, approximately 53% of the original value assigned to these
assets will be amortized within the first five years after the acquisition date. The Company
believes that these cash flows are most reflective of the pattern in which the economic benefit of
the finite-lived intangible assets will be consumed. For the year ended December 31, 2007
66
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
approximately $8.3 million of amortization expense related to the acquired finite-lived intangible
assets was included in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The following balance sheets set forth the major assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
connection with the CellStar and Dangaard Telecom transactions discussed above (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dangaard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom |
|
|
CellStar |
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
7,104 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts Receivable |
|
|
288,158 |
|
|
|
66,191 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
183,391 |
|
|
|
32,974 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
21,671 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets: |
|
|
500,324 |
|
|
|
99,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
269,983 |
|
|
|
48,199 |
|
Intangible
assets subject to amortization |
|
|
123,148 |
|
|
|
11,620 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
9,247 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
911,227 |
|
|
$ |
160,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
142,409 |
|
|
$ |
80,909 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
68,218 |
|
|
|
12,015 |
|
Debt |
|
|
348,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
39,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilties assumed |
|
$ |
600,127 |
|
|
$ |
92,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
311,100 |
|
|
$ |
67,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various factors contributed to the goodwill recorded in connection with the CellStar and Dangaard
Telecom acquisitions, including the value of assembled workforces of the respective business at the
acquisition dates; the future revenue growth from increased market penetration and new customers;
and expected synergies. The goodwill recorded in connection with the Dangaard Telecom acquisition
is generally not deductible for tax purposes. However, the goodwill acquired in connection with the
CellStar transaction is deductible for tax purposes. The CellStar goodwill has been assigned to the
Americas reportable segment. The goodwill related to the Dangaard Telecom acquisition has been
assigned primarily to the Companys Europe reportable segment.
The following sets forth unaudited pro forma financial information in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States assuming each of the acquisitions discussed
above took place at the beginning of each period presented. The unaudited pro forma results include
certain adjustments as described in the notes below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
5,540,632 |
|
|
$ |
4,988,983 |
|
Income from
continuing operations |
|
|
31,327 |
|
|
|
51,995 |
|
Net income |
|
|
32,002 |
|
|
|
51,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
67
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dangaard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(amounts in 000s) |
|
CellStar |
|
Note |
|
Telecom |
|
Brightpoint |
|
Adjustments |
|
Note |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
126,991 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,268,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,300,275 |
|
|
$ |
(155,007 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
5,540,632 |
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8,722) |
(2) |
|
|
46,719 |
|
|
|
(6,597 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
31,327 |
|
Net income |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8,722 |
) |
|
|
47,394 |
|
|
|
(6,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,002 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,571 |
|
|
|
17,342 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
80,913 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
599,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,182,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,425,373 |
|
|
$ |
(218,355 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
4,988,983 |
|
Income from continuing
operations |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,388 |
|
|
|
36,190 |
|
|
|
(11,994 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
51,995 |
|
Net income |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,388 |
|
|
|
35,610 |
|
|
|
(11,994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,415 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,554 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
80,554 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
Pro-forma adjustments
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Results for CellStar are included in the financial results of Brightpoint for the
period April 1, 2007 December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Results for Dangaard Telecom are included in the financial results of Brightpoint for
the period August 1, 2007 December 31, 2007. Dangaard Telecom results for the seven
months ended July 31, 2007 include a charge of $2.1 million to write-off unamortized
deferred financing costs, $1.0 million of integration costs and charges of approximately
$11.0 million to $13.0 million of adjustments related to obsolescence, warranty and other
reserves. |
|
(3) |
|
To reclassify the cost of revenue that was historically presented by Dangaard Telecom
on a gross basis to a net basis to conform with EITF 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a
Principal versus Net as an Agent and Brightpoint accounting policy. |
|
(4) |
|
To record the following: |
|
|
|
amortization of the finite-lived intangible assets recorded as a result of the
acquisitions of CellStar and Dangaard Telecom, |
|
|
|
|
reversal of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs recorded in
July 2007, |
|
|
|
|
interest expense on borrowings used to finance the CellStar acquisition, and |
|
|
|
|
income tax provision for the effect of the pro forma adjustments above based on
statutory tax rates. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
To adjust the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to determine diluted
pro forma earnings per share assuming the 30,000,000 shares of the Companys unregistered
Common Stock (including escrow shares) used to acquire Dangaard Telecom were issued at the
beginning of the period presented. |
68
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4. Income Tax Expense
For financial reporting purposes, income from continuing operations before income taxes, by tax
jurisdiction, is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
11,944 |
|
|
$ |
17,428 |
|
|
$ |
17,234 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
35,562 |
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
25,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,506 |
|
|
$ |
48,428 |
|
|
$ |
42,976 |
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation for 2007, 2006 and 2005 of income tax expense (benefit) computed at the U.S.
Federal statutory tax rate to the Companys effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Tax at U.S. Federal statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and local income taxes, net of U.S. Federal benefit |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
Net benefit of tax on foreign operations |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
Release of valuation allowance |
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
|
The effective tax rate decreased from 2006 to 2007 primarily due to a $14.1 million benefit related
to the reversal of valuation allowances on certain foreign tax credit carryforwards as well as a
$2.1 million benefit resulting from a reduction in the statutory tax rate in Germany. Based on
taxable income and utilization of prior net operating loss carryforwards, it became more likely
than not during the second quarter of 2007 that the Company will be able to utilize these foreign
tax credits prior to their expiration.
Significant components of the provision for income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
5,693 |
|
|
$ |
6,788 |
|
|
$ |
4,549 |
|
State |
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
16,477 |
|
|
|
7,145 |
|
|
|
6,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,812 |
|
|
$ |
14,592 |
|
|
$ |
11,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
(14,664 |
) |
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
|
$ |
(751 |
) |
State |
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(8,393 |
) |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,372 |
) |
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
|
$ |
12,238 |
|
|
$ |
11,058 |
|
|
|
|
During 2007, there was no income tax expense recorded in discontinued operations. During 2006 and
2005 there was an income tax expense (benefit) recorded in discontinued operations of $0.1 million
and ($0.6) million.
Components of the Companys net deferred tax assets after valuation allowance are as follows (in
thousands):
69
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
12,631 |
|
|
|
8,174 |
|
Noncurrent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and other long-term assets |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
Net operating losses and other carryforwards |
|
|
30,079 |
|
|
|
23,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,407 |
|
|
|
33,498 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(8,713 |
) |
|
|
(22,940 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
37,694 |
|
|
|
10,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(1,184 |
) |
Noncurrent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
|
|
(2,357 |
) |
Other assets and long-term liabilities |
|
|
(34,376 |
) |
|
|
(1,961 |
) |
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(36,325 |
) |
|
|
(5,502 |
) |
|
|
|
Net deferred assets |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
5,056 |
|
|
|
|
Income tax payments for continuing operations were $ 14.7 million, $4.6 million and $6.6 million in
2007, 2006 and 2005.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$73.4 million of which $1.2 million expire between 2008 and 2011 and $72.2 million have no
expiration date. The Company also has U.S. foreign tax credits of $14.1 million of which $12.7
million expire during 2012 and $1.4 million expire between 2013 and 2015. The Company determined
that a portion of the deferred tax asset related to net operating loss carryforwards is not likely
to be realized, and a valuation allowance has been established against that asset to record it at
its expected realizable value. Undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign operations were
approximately $68.0 million at December 31, 2007. Those earnings are generally considered to be
indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal or state income taxes or
foreign withholding taxes has been made. Upon distribution of those earnings, the Company would be
subject to U.S. income taxes (subject to a reduction for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes
payable to the various foreign countries. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S.
income tax liability is not practical.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. The
provisions of FIN 48 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. This Interpretation
requires the recognition of a tax position when it is more likely than not that the tax position
will be sustained upon examination by relevant taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of
the position. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater
than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The adoption of FIN 48 did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. As of the date of adoption, the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits totaled $2.2 million ($0.1 in interest and $2.1 million of tax
positions), which if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. Interest costs and penalties
related to income taxes are classified as tax expense. The total amount of accrued interest and
penalties at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million
respectively. Interest recognized as part of the Companys provision for income taxes was not
material in 2007. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,119 |
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
|
659 |
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
(510 |
) |
Lapse of statute of limitations |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,177 |
|
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. Federal, various states and
various foreign jurisdictions. The Company remains subject to examination by U.S. Federal and major
state jurisdictions for years after 2002 and by major foreign tax jurisdictions for years after
2000. The Company does not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly
change within the next 12 months.
70
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5. Divestitures and Discontinued Operations
The Company records amounts in discontinued operations as required by SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance with SFAS 144, the results of operations
and related disposal costs, gains and losses for significant business units that the Company has
eliminated or sold are classified in discontinued operations, for all periods presented.
Details of discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
(337 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,208 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations (1) |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
(417 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations (2) |
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
(580 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $13.8 million of goodwill and intangible asset impairment charges for the year
ended December 31, 2005 related to the Companys operations in France. |
|
(2) |
|
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2005
includes $2.2 million loss on sale of France operations (net of approximately $3.5 million
gains related to cumulative currency translation adjustments), which is partially offset by
approximately $1.0 million of tax benefits from previous disposals. |
France Operations
On December 16, 2005, the Companys subsidiary, Brightpoint Holdings B.V., completed the sale of
all the equity securities of Brightpoint France SARL (Brightpoint France) to an entity formed by
the former managing director of Brightpoint France. Consideration for the sale consisted of a
loan receivable from the purchaser of which the Company received approximately $0.5 million during
2006 and $0.7 million during 2007 (including interest). The remaining face value of the loan
receivable from the purchaser at December 31, 2007 was approximately $0.6 million and is due in
December 2008. The Company recorded a loss from the sale of approximately $2.2 million,
representing the difference between the carrying value of Brightpoint France and the fair value of
consideration received. During the third quarter of 2005, the Company recorded impairment charges
in connection with its plan to sell Brightpoint France, including a $13.8 million non-cash
impairment charge to the value of goodwill and other intangible assets, which is included in Loss
from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Brightpoint France was
part of the Companys Europe division.
6. Property and Equipment
The components of property and equipment are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
Information systems equipment and software |
|
$ |
96,060 |
|
|
$ |
70,017 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
31,669 |
|
|
|
28,018 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
14,387 |
|
|
|
7,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,116 |
|
|
|
105,615 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(86,384 |
) |
|
|
(67,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,732 |
|
|
$ |
37,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense charged to continuing operations was $14.2 million, $11.9 million and $10.7
million in 2007, 2006 and 2005.
71
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7. Lease Arrangements
The Company leases its office and warehouse space as well as certain furniture and equipment under
operating leases. Total rent expense charged to continuing operations for these operating leases
was $15.2 million, $14.7 million and $10.5 million for 2007, 2006 and 2005.
The aggregate future minimum payments on the above leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
20,783 |
|
2009 |
|
|
17,803 |
|
2010 |
|
|
14,483 |
|
2011 |
|
|
12,546 |
|
2012 |
|
|
9,980 |
|
Thereafter* |
|
|
41,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes approximately $29.1 million related to the Companys 495,000 square foot facility
located in Plainfield, Indiana, for which the initial lease term expires in 2019 and
approximately $9.3 million related to the Companys 150,000 square foot Europe headquarters
located in Denmark for which the initial lease term expires in 2018. The minimum lease
payments increase every three years on the Plainfield lease agreement. The Company recognizes
rent expense on a straight-line basis, which results in deferred rent during the portion of
the lease term in which payments are less than the expense recognized. As a result, the
Company has a deferred rent liability for the Plainfield lease of $5.7 million and $5.6
million at December 31, 2007 and 2006 which is included as a component of Other long-term
liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
8. Borrowings
The table below summarizes the borrowings that were available to the Company as of December 31,
2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of Credit & |
|
Net |
|
|
Availability |
|
Outstanding |
|
Guarantees |
|
Availability |
|
|
|
Global Term Loans |
|
$ |
252,454 |
|
|
$ |
252,454 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Global Credit Facility |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
208,399 |
|
|
|
23,288 |
|
|
|
68,313 |
|
Other |
|
|
62,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,122 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
614,576 |
|
|
$ |
460,853 |
|
|
$ |
23,288 |
|
|
$ |
130,435 |
|
|
|
|
On February 16, 2007, the Company entered into a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) by and among
the Company (and certain of its subsidiaries identified therein), Banc of America Securities LLC,
as sole lead arranger and book manager, General Electric Capital Corporation, as syndication agent,
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as documentation agent, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as documentation agent, Bank of
America, N.A., as administration agent and the other lenders party thereto. The Credit Agreement
established a five year senior secured revolving credit facility with a line of credit in the
initial amount of $165.0 million (Global Credit Facility). The Global Credit Facility contained an
uncommitted accordion facility pursuant to which the Company was able to increase the total
commitment under the revolving credit facility to $240 million. The Credit Agreement is subject to
certain financial covenants and is secured by a lien on certain of the Companys property and a
pledge of the voting stock issued by certain of its subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement replaced the
$70.0 million North American asset based credit facility under the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of March 18, 2004, as amended, and the $50.0 million Australian Dollar
(approximately $39.0 million U.S. Dollars) asset based credit facility in Australia under the
credit agreement dated December 24, 2002, as amended.
On July 31, 2007 the parties to the Credit Agreement entered into the First Amendment to the Credit
Agreement (the First Amendment), which, among other things, resulted in: (i) an increase in the
amount available under the Global Credit Facility from $240.0 million to $300.0 million, (ii) the
extension to the domestic borrowers of a term loan in an original
72
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
principal amount of
$125.0 million, (iii) the extension to the foreign borrowers, including one of the Dangaard
companies, of a term loan in an original principal amount equivalent to $125.0 million (denominated
in Euros) (together with (ii), the Global Term Loans), (iv) the addition to the Credit Agreement
of two Dangaard Telecom companies as foreign borrowers and five other Dangaard Telecom companies as
foreign guarantors, and (v) increased commitments, in certain cases, from existing members of the
bank group, and new commitments from other lenders who became new members of the bank group upon
the closing of the First Amendment.
The Global Credit Facility and the Global Term Loans bear interest at a base rate plus an
adjustment based on the Companys consolidated leverage ratio. The base rate for borrowings
denominated in US Dollars under the Global Credit Facility is the higher of (a) the Federal Funds
Rate plus 0.50% or (b) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time
to time by Bank of America as its prime rate. The base rate for borrowings denominated in Euros
under the Global Credit Facility is LIBOR. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2007
was approximately 6.8%.
At December 31, 2007, the Company and its subsidiaries were in compliance with the covenants in
each of its credit agreements. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, interest
expense, which approximates cash payments of interest, was $20.1 million, $2.3 million and $1.2
million. Interest expense includes interest on outstanding debt, fees paid for unused capacity on
credit lines and amortization of deferred financing fees.
Principal payments on the debt discussed above, excluding the effects of permitted prepayments
which may be made under the Credit Agreement, for the next five years are expected to be as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
19,332 |
|
2009 |
|
|
32,381 |
|
2010 |
|
|
45,334 |
|
2011 |
|
|
90,667 |
|
2012 |
|
|
273,139 |
|
|
|
$ |
460,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Guarantees
In accordance with FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, guarantees are recorded at fair value and
disclosed, even when the likelihood of making any payments under such guarantees is remote.
In some circumstances, the Company purchases inventory with payment terms requiring letters of
credit. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has issued $23.3 million in standby letters of credit.
These standby letters of credit are generally issued for a one-year term and are supported by
availability under the Companys credit facilities. The underlying obligations for which these
letters of credit have been issued are recorded in the financial statements at their full value.
Should the Company fail to pay its obligation to one or all of these suppliers, the suppliers may
draw on the standby letter of credit issued for them. As of December 31, 2007, the maximum future
payments under these letters of credit are $23.3 million.
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors, to the
extent permitted by law, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to reimburse its officers and
directors for legal expenses in the event of litigation and regulatory matters. The terms of these
indemnification agreements provide for no limitation to the maximum potential future payments. The
Company has a directors and officers insurance policy that may, in certain instances, mitigate the
potential liability and payments.
Late in 2004, the Company entered into a non-exclusive agreement to distribute wireless devices in
Europe for a certain supplier. Subject to this agreement, the Company provides warranty repair
services on certain devices it distributes for this supplier. The warranty period for these devices
ranges from 12 to 24 months, and the Company is liable for providing warranty repair services
unless failure rates exceed a certain threshold. The Company records estimated expenses related to
future warranty repair at the time the devices are sold. Estimates for warranty costs are
calculated primarily based on managements assumptions related to cost of repairs and anticipated
failure rates. During 2006, this supplier re-branded its devices and provides aftermarket support
services including warranty repairs. The Company does not provide warranty repair services on the
re-branded devices on behalf of the supplier; however the Company does provide aftermarket support
services including warranty repairs for wireless devices sold by one of the Companys European
operations to one customer. Sales of
73
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
devices for which the Company provides warranty repair
services have decreased significantly since this supplier re-branded its devices. Warranty accruals
are adjusted from time to time when the Companys actual warranty claim experience differs from its
estimates and are recorded in Accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The change in
estimate for the year ended December 31, 2007 was a result of higher failure rates and higher cost
of repairs than previously experienced. The obligation assumed through the acquisition of Dangaard
Telecom is related to a similar program. A summary of the changes in the product warranty accrual
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
January 1 |
|
$ |
3,063 |
|
|
|
2,117 |
|
Warranty liability assumed from Dangaard |
|
|
3,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for product warranties |
|
|
3,386 |
|
|
|
4,837 |
|
Change in estimate |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
Settlements during the period |
|
|
(8,038 |
) |
|
|
(3,430 |
) |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
$ |
3,944 |
|
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
|
10. Shareholders Equity
In May 2006, the Board of Directors approved a 6 for 5 stock split paid in the form of a 20% stock
dividend. In 2005, the Board of Directors approved two 3 for 2 stock splits paid in the form of 50%
stock dividends. These stock splits were effected primarily to increase the liquidity of the stock,
increase the number of shares in the market and to improve the affordability of the stock for
investors. All references in the financial statements related to share amounts, per share amounts,
average shares outstanding and information concerning stock option plans have been adjusted
retroactively to reflect stock splits, including the Companys 6 for 5 stock split effected on May
31, 2006 and the 3 for 2 common stock splits effected on December 30, 2005 and September 15, 2005.
The Company has authorized 1.0 million shares of preferred stock, which remain unissued. The Board
of Directors has not yet determined the preferences, qualifications, relative voting or other
rights of the authorized shares of preferred stock.
Treasury Stock
As of December 31, 2007, the Company has repurchased a total of 6,929,716 shares of its own common
stock at a weighted average price of $8.47 totaling $58.7 million.
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
The Company has a Shareholders Rights Agreement, as amended, commonly known as a poison pill,
which provides that in the event an individual or entity becomes a beneficial holder of 15% or more
of the shares of the Companys capital stock (an Acquiring Event), other shareholders of the
Company shall have the right to purchase shares of the Companys (or in some cases, the acquirers)
common stock at 50% of its then market value. Pursuant to the Rights Agreement, a dividend of
Preferred Share Purchase Rights was paid to holders of record of common stock on the record date as
of the close of business on February 20, 1997. Each of these Rights entitles the registered holder
to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of the Companys Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock, par value $.01 per share. Holders of the Companys common stock will, upon the occurrence of
an Acquiring Event, be entitled to purchase these Preferred Shares from the Company at a price of
$135 per one one-thousandth of a Preferred Share, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
The description and terms of the Rights are set forth in a Rights Agreement between the Company and
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, as Rights Agent. Preferred Shares will not be
redeemable. Each Preferred Share will be entitled to a minimum preferential quarterly dividend
payment of $1.00 per share but will be entitled to an aggregate dividend of 1,000 times the
dividend declared per share of common stock. In the event of liquidation, the holders of the
Preferred Shares will be entitled to a minimum preferential liquidation payment of $1.00 per share
but will be entitled to an aggregate payment of 1,000 times the payment made per share of common
stock. Each Preferred Share will have 1,000 votes, voting together with the Common Stock.
11. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company maintains an employee savings plan, which permits employees based in the United States
with at least thirty days of service to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section
401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. After 90
74
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
days of service, the Company matches 50% of employee
contributions, up to 6% of each employees salary in cash. In connection with the required match,
the Companys contributions to the Plan were approximately $0.7 million, $0.4 million and $0.3
million in 2007, 2006 and 2005.
During 2005, the Company entered into Supplemental Retirement Benefit Agreements (Retirement
Agreements) with certain executive officers. Under the Retirement Agreements, the Company will
implement a supplemental retirement benefit providing these executives with a 10-year annuity. The
Company has accounted for these Retirement Agreements as a pension plan (the Plan) in accordance
with SFAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions as amended by SFAS 158. The Plan is
noncontributory and unfunded, and the Company does not expect to make any contributions to the Plan
in 2008. The amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability |
|
$ |
(2,304 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,754 |
) |
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
The accrued benefit liability is included as a component of Other long-term liabilities in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
12. Legal Proceedings and Contingencies
On July 31, 2007, we acquired Dangaard Telecom which had the following material claims and/or
disputes:
German value-added tax authorities
There are two disputes pending with Finanzamt Flensburg, the German value-added tax, or VAT,
authorities (the Finanzamt):
|
1. |
|
Dangaard Telecoms subsidiary, Dangaard Telecom Denmark A/S, received an assessment
from the Finanzamt claiming that local German VAT should be applied on sales made by
Dangaard Telecom Denmark A/S to two specific German customers in 1997 and 1998. Finanzamt
claimed approximately $2.9 million. The case is currently in abeyance waiting for a
principal decision or settlement involving similar cases pending in Germany. Dangaard
Telecom Denmark A/S continues to dispute this claim and intends to defend this matter
vigorously. The former shareholders of Dangaard Telecom agreed to indemnify Dangaard
Holding with respect to this dispute when Dangaard Holding acquired Dangaard Telecom, and
Dangaard Holding has agreed in the purchase agreement to transfer and assign these
indemnification rights to us (or enforce them on our behalf if such transfer or assignment
is not permitted). |
|
|
2. |
|
Dangaard Telecoms subsidiary, Dangaard Telecom Denmark A/S, received a notice from the
Finanzamt claiming that local German VAT should be applied on all sales made by Dangaard
Telecom Denmark A/S to German customers during the years 1999 to 2004. Finanzamt claimed
approximately $8.1 million. The case is currently in abeyance waiting for a principal
decision or settlement involving similar cases pending in Germany. Dangaard Telecom Denmark
A/S continues to dispute this claim and intends to defend this matter vigorously. The
former shareholders of Dangaard Telecom agreed to indemnify Dangaard Holding with respect
to 80% of this claim when Dangaard Holding acquired Dangaard Telecom, and Dangaard Holding
has agreed in the purchase agreement to transfer and assign these indemnification rights to
us (or enforce them on our behalf if such transfer or assignment is not permitted). |
Fleggaard group of companies
The former headquarters of Dangaard Telecom was in premises rented from a member of the Fleggaard
group of companies, which was a former shareholder of Dangaard Telecom. A fire in March 2006 caused
by another tenant in the building destroyed the headquarters and Dangaard Telecom had to leave the
building while awaiting renovation of its space. Because of Fleggards failure to renovate the
space, Dangaard Telecom terminated the lease. Fleggaard has disputed the lease termination and has
claimed $1.4 million in damages. Dangaard Telecom continues to dispute this claim and intends to
defend this matter vigorously.
Norwegian tax authorities
Dangaard Telecoms subsidiary, Dangaard Telecom Norway AS Group, received notice from the Norwegian
tax authorities regarding tax claims in connection with certain capital gains. The Norwegian tax
authorities have claimed $2.7 million.
75
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Dangaard Telecom Norway AS Group continues to dispute this claim and intends to defend this matter
vigorously. The former shareholders of Dangaard Telecom agreed to indemnify Dangaard Holding with
respect to 80% of this claim when Dangaard Holding acquired Dangaard Telecom, and Dangaard Holding
agreed in the purchase agreement with the Company Brightpoint to transfer and assign these
indemnification rights to the Company (or enforce them on our behalf if such transfer or assignment
is not permitted).
German tax authorities
Dangaard Telecoms subsidiary, Dangaard Telecom Germany Holding GmbH, received notice from the
German tax authorities regarding tax claims in connection with the deductibility of certain stock
adjustments and various fees during the period 1998 to 2002. Dangaard Telecom Germany Holding GmbH
agreed to pay part of the claim, and the current amount in dispute is $1.8 million. Dangaard
Telecom Germany Holding GmbH continues to dispute this claim and intends to defend this matter
vigorously. The former shareholders of Dangaard Telecom are obliged to indemnify Dangaard Holding
with respect to any such tax claims. Due to the claims limited size, however, it will be below an
agreed upon threshold, therefore the indemnification would not be activated by this claim if no
other claims for indemnification have been or are asserted.
13. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
641,629 |
|
|
$ |
850,995 |
|
|
$ |
1,177,986 |
|
|
$ |
1,629,665 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
32,715 |
|
|
|
41,583 |
|
|
|
78,041 |
|
|
|
118,247 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
17,721 |
|
|
|
12,984 |
|
|
|
14,172 |
|
Net income |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
17,688 |
|
|
|
12,962 |
|
|
|
14,894 |
|
Earnings per share-basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Earnings per share-diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
564,555 |
|
|
$ |
549,858 |
|
|
$ |
633,739 |
|
|
$ |
677,221 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
36,312 |
|
|
|
35,744 |
|
|
|
37,002 |
|
|
|
41,848 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
9,001 |
|
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
8,944 |
|
|
|
10,033 |
|
Net income |
|
|
8,868 |
|
|
|
8,241 |
|
|
|
8,764 |
|
|
|
9,737 |
|
Earnings per share-basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Earnings per share-diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
Note: Information in any one quarterly period should not be considered indicative of annual results
due to the effects of seasonality on the Companys business in certain markets. The information
presented above reflects:
|
|
|
the effects of the 6 for 5 common stock split effected on May 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of acquisitions as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of a $14.1 million benefit related to the reversal of valuation
allowances on certain foreign tax credit carryforwards in the second quarter of
2007; |
|
|
|
|
the effects of a $2.1 million benefit resulting from a reduction in the statutory
tax rate in Germany in the second quarter of 2007; |
|
|
|
|
and the effects of an $8.5 million restructuring charge in the fourth quarter of
2007. |
76
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
14. Accounts Receivable Factoring
Through the Spain and Germany operations acquired in the purchase of Dangaard Telecom, the Company
has agreements with unrelated third-parties for the factoring of specific accounts receivable of
these subsidiaries in order to reduce the amount of working capital required to fund such
receivables. The factoring of accounts receivable under these agreements are accounted for as sales
in accordance with SFAS 140, Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities, and accordingly, are accounted for as off-balance sheet arrangements. Proceeds on the
transfer reflect the face value of the account less a discount. The discount is recorded as a
charge in Interest, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the period of the sale.
Net funds received reduced accounts receivable outstanding while increasing cash. The Company is
the collection agent on behalf of the third parties for these arrangements and has no significant
retained interests or servicing liabilities related to the accounts receivable that it has sold.
At December 31, 2007, the Company had sold $73.0 million of accounts receivable pursuant to these
agreements, which represents the face amount of total outstanding receivables at that date. Fees
paid pursuant to these agreements were $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
15. Restructuring
Prior to the completion of the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom, Company management began
formulating a plan to exit certain activities of the combined company. Components of this
preliminary plan included terminating Dangaard Telecoms implementation of SAP and related software
and consolidating certain facilities. As part of that decision, the Company determined that costs
capitalized related to the implementation of SAP in the period after the acquisition of Dangaard
Telecom were impaired under SFAS 144. Accordingly, an impairment charge of $7.1 million was
recorded in the Companys Europe division. In addition, the Company recorded $1.6 million in
severance and other costs to consolidate the Brightpoint and Dangaard Telecom operations in
Germany. The Company anticipates taking an additional restructuring charge during the first half of
2008 of approximately $3.2 million to $3.8 million associated with the final exit of our redundant
warehouse and office facility in Germany.
As Company management finalizes the plan, additional liabilities may result primarily related to
involuntary employee termination costs and costs to exit certain facilities in our Europe
operations. These additional liabilities will be recognized as liabilities assumed in the business
combination and included in the allocation of the acquisition costs in accordance with EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchased Business Combination. A plan is expected
to be completed by the first quarter of 2008. Adjustments to the purchase price allocation under
the preliminary plan resulted in reductions of assets acquired of $16.7 million and additional
liabilities assumed of $2.7 million.
Reserve activity for the restructuring as of December 31, 2007 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Terminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
$ |
7,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,565 |
|
|
$ |
8,661 |
|
Dangaard Telecom goodwill adjustment |
|
|
16,698 |
|
|
|
2,663 |
|
|
|
19,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total activity: |
|
|
23,794 |
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
|
|
28,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash usage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
Non-cash usage |
|
|
(23,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,064 |
|
|
$ |
4,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
Brightpoint, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
16. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Currency translation of foreign investments |
|
$ |
45,170 |
|
|
$ |
4,169 |
|
|
$ |
(4,379 |
) |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities
classified as available for sale |
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefit obligation |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income: |
|
$ |
44,303 |
|
|
$ |
3,710 |
|
|
$ |
(4,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Brightpoint, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of Brightpoint, Inc. as of December
31, 2007 and 2006, and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations, Shareholders Equity and
Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007. Our audits also
include the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a) (2). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Brightpoint, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006
and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the financial information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) Share Based Payments on January 1, 2006.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Brightpoint, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2007, based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February
22, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 22, 2008
79
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Brightpoint, Inc.
We have audited Brightpoint, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Brightpoint,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material misstatement exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting,
managements assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting did not include the internal controls of Dangaard Telecom A/S and subsidiaries and
certain assets and liabilities of CellStar Latin America, which are included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements of Brightpoint, Inc. and constituted 63% and 84% of total and net assets,
respectively as of December 31, 2007 and 25% and 14% of revenues and net income respectively for
the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Brightpoint, Inc.
also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Dangaard
Telecom A/S and subsidiaries and certain assets and liabilities of CellStar Latin America.
In our opinion, Brightpoint, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Brightpoint, Inc. as of December 31, 2007
and 2006 and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations, Shareholders Equity, and Cash
Flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and the financial statement
schedule listed in Item 15(a)(2) of Brightpoint, Inc. and our report dated February 22, 2008
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
80
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 22, 2008
81
Item 9. Changes in and disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer has evaluated the effectiveness of its
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. Based on that
evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer also conducted an evaluation of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f))
(Internal Control) to determine whether any changes in Internal Control occurred during the
quarter ended December 31, 2007 that have materially affected or which are reasonably likely to
materially affect Internal Control. Based on that evaluation, there has been no change in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal
control over financial reporting, except that we are still in the process of integrating the
CellStar and Dangaard operations and will be incorporating these operations as part of our internal
controls. For purposes of this evaluation, the impact of the acquisition of certain assets and
assumption of certain liabilities from CellStar, which closed on the last day of the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2007, and the impact of the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom A/S, which closed on
July 31, 2007, on our internal controls over financial reporting has been excluded. See Note 3 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 for a discussion of the above
acquisitions.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2007 using the criteria set forth in Internal Control Integrated Framework
founded by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Managements
assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did
not include the internal controls of Dangaard Telecom A/S and subsidiaries and certain assets and
liabilities of CellStar Latin America, which were acquired by the Company in July 2007 and March
2007, respectively, which are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements of Brightpoint,
Inc. and constituted 63% of total assets as of December 31, 2007 and 25% of revenues for the year
then ended. Companies are allowed to exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal control
over financial reporting during the first year of the acquisition under guidelines established by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on this evaluation, management of Brightpoint, Inc.
has concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2007.
The management of Brightpoint, Inc. is responsible for the preparation and integrity of the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, establishing and maintaining adequate internal control
over financial reporting for the Company and all related information appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. The Company maintains accounting and internal control systems which are
intended to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized
use or disposition, transactions are executed in accordance with managements authorization and
accounting records are reliable for preparing financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. A staff of internal auditors regularly monitors, on a
worldwide basis, the adequacy and effectiveness of internal accounting controls. The Vice-President
of Internal Audit reports directly to the audit committee of the board of directors.
82
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can provide only
reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and may not prevent or
detect misstatements. In addition, any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting in future periods is subject to risk that
those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The financial statements for each of the years covered in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been
audited by independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP. Additionally, Ernst &
Young LLP has provided an independent assessment as to the fairness of the financial statements and
an attestation report on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007.
Audit Committee Oversight
The Board of Directors has appointed an Audit Committee whose current four members are not
employees of the Company. The Board of Directors has also adopted a written charter that
establishes the roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee. Pursuant to its charter, the
Audit Committee meets with certain members of management, internal audit and the independent
auditors to review the results of their work and satisfy itself that its responsibilities are being
properly discharged. The independent auditors have full and free access to the Audit Committee and
have discussions with the Audit Committee regarding appropriate matters, with and without
management present.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
83
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive
Proxy Statement related to the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2008, which
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end
of the 2007 fiscal year.
Code of Business Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct that applies to our employees, including our Directors
and Executive Officers. Copies of our Code of Business Conduct are available on our website
(www.brightpoint.com) and are also available without charge upon written request directed to
Investor Relations, Brightpoint, Inc., 2601 Metropolis Parkway, Suite 210, Plainfield, Indiana
46168. If we make changes to our Code of Business Conduct in any material respect or waive any
provision of the Code of Business Conduct for any of our Directors or Executive Officers, we expect
to provide the public with notice of any such change or waiver by publishing a description of such
event on our corporate website, www.brightpoint.com, or by other appropriate means as required by
applicable rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive
Proxy Statement related to the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2008, which
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end
of the 2007 fiscal year.
Item 12. Security Ownership of certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive
Proxy Statement related to the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2008, which
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end
of the 2007 fiscal year.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive
Proxy Statement related to the Companys Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2008, which
will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end
of the fiscal year.
84
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive
Proxy Statement related to the Companys 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days following the end of the fiscal
year.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of Brightpoint, Inc. are filed as part of this report under
Item 8.
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is
shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(a) (3) Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
2.1
|
|
Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of the entire issued share capital of Brightpoint (Ireland) Limited dated
February 19, 2004(11) |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Plan and Agreement of Merger between Brightpoint, Inc. and Brightpoint Indiana Corp. dated April 23, 2004(13) |
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Agreement for the Sale and Purchase of 100% of the Securities of Brightpoint France and Transfer of Shareholder
Loan(25) |
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Brightpoint Holdings B.V. and John Alexander Du Plessis Currie, the sole
shareholder of Persequor Limited effective as of January 1, 2006(26)** |
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 18, 2006 by and among 2601 Metropolis Corp., CellStar Corporation, National
Auto Center, Inc., CellStar Ltd. and CellStar Fulfillment Ltd.(28) |
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 19, 2007 as amended on April 19, 2007, May 17, 2007 and June 15, 2007 by and
among Brightpoint, Inc., Dangaard Holding A/S, Dangaard Telecom A/S and Nordic Capital Fund VI (for purposes of
Sections 6.16 and 12.14 only), consisting of: Nordic Capital VI Alpha, L.P., Nordic Capital Beta, L.P., NC VI
Limited and Nordic Industries Limited and First, Second and Third Amendments thereto. (33) |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Brightpoint, Inc. (formerly Brightpoint Indiana Corp.)(17) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-Laws of
Brightpoint, Inc. as amended (formerly Brightpoint Indiana Corp.)(36) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture between the Company and the Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee dated as of March 11, 1998 (2) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Termination Agreement effective as of January 1, 2006 terminating the Shareholders Agreement by and among
Brightpoint India Private Limited, Brightpoint Holdings B.V. and Persequor Limited dated as of November 1, 2003, as
amended(26) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Shareholder Agreement dated as of July 31, 2007 by and among Brightpoint, Inc. and Dangaard Holding A/S. (34) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 31, 2007 by and among Brightpoint, Inc. and Dangaard Holding A/S. (34) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of February 20, 1997, between Brightpoint, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer and Trust
Company, as Rights Agent(1) |
|
|
|
10.1.1
|
|
Amendment Number 1 to the Rights Agreement by and between Brightpoint, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, as Rights Agent, appointing American Stock Transfer & Trust Company dated as of January 4, 1999(4) |
|
|
|
10.1.2
|
|
Amendment Number 2 to the Rights Agreement by and between Brightpoint, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, as Rights Agent, dated as of April 12, 2004(16) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended(8)* |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan(5) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Brightpoint, Inc. 401(k) Plan (2001 Restatement)(9) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
First Amendment to the Brightpoint, Inc. 401(k) Plan effective January 1, 2002(9) |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Brightpoint, Inc. 401(k) Plan, effective October 1, 2002(10) |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan(14)* |
|
|
|
10.7.1
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan between the Company and Executive
Grantee(12)* |
|
|
|
10.7.2
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan between the Company and Non-executive
Grantee(12)* |
85
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.7.3
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement between the Company and Grantee(12)* |
|
|
|
10.7.4
|
|
Form of Executive Stock Option Agreement with Forfeiture Provision(20)* |
|
|
|
10.7.5
|
|
Form of Executive Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with Forfeiture Provision(20)* |
|
10.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Independent Director Stock Compensation Plan(15)* |
|
|
|
10.8.1
|
|
Summary Sheet of 2007 Director Fees and Named Executive Officer Compensation(31)* |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and Officers(12) |
|
|
|
10.9.2
|
|
Indemnification Agreement between Brightpoint and Mr. V. William Hunt dated February 11, 2004(11) |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert J. Laikin dated July 1, 1999(6)* |
|
|
|
10.10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated January 1, 2001 to the Amended and Restated Agreement between the Company and Robert J. Laikin
dated July 1, 1999(7)* |
|
|
|
10.10.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated January 1, 2003 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert J.
Laikin dated July 1, 1999(10)* |
|
|
|
10.10.3
|
|
Amendment No. 3 dated January 1, 2004 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert J.
Laikin dated July 1, 1999(11)* |
|
|
|
10.10.4
|
|
Amendment No. 4 dated April 7, 2005 to Amended and restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert J.
Laikin dated July 1, 1999(21)* |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and J. Mark Howell dated July 1, 1999(6)* |
|
|
|
10.11.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated January 1, 2001 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and J.
Mark Howell dated July 1, 1999(7)* |
|
|
|
10.11.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated January 1, 2003 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and J. Mark
Howell dated July 1, 1999 (10)* |
|
|
|
10.11.3
|
|
Amendment No. 3 dated January 1, 2004 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and J. Mark
Howell dated July 1, 1999 (11)* |
|
|
|
10.11.4
|
|
Amendment No. 4 dated April 7, 2005 to Amended and restated Employment Agreement between the Company and J. Mark
Howell dated July 1, 1999(21)* |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven E. Fivel dated July 1, 1999(6)* |
|
|
|
10.12.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated January 1, 2001 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and
Steven E. Fivel dated July 1, 1999(7)* |
|
|
|
10.12.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 dated January 1, 2002 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and
Steven E. Fivel dated July 1, 1999(9)* |
|
|
|
10.12.3
|
|
Amendment No. 3 dated January 1, 2003 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven E.
Fivel dated July 1, 1999(10)* |
|
|
|
10.12.4
|
|
Amendment No. 4 dated January 1, 2004 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven E.
Fivel dated July 1, 1999(11)* |
|
|
|
10.12.5
|
|
Amendment No. 5 dated April 7, 2005 to Amended and restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven E.
Fivel dated July 1, 1999(21)* |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Lease Agreement between the Company and Airtech Parkway Associates, LLC, dated September 18, 1998(3) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Lease Agreement between Wireless Fulfillment Services, LLC and Harbour Properties, LLC, dated April 25, 2000(7) |
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Lease Agreement between Brightpoint North America, L.P. and DP Industrial, LLC, dated as of October 1, 2004(18) |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Lease Agreement between Wireless Fulfillment Services, LLC and Perpetual Trustee Company Limited, dated November 10,
2004(19) |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Credit Agreement dated February 16, 2007 by and among Brightpoint, Inc. (and certain of its subsidiaries identified
therein), Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and book manager, General Electric Capital
Corporation, as syndication agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as documentation agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
administration agent, and the other lenders party thereto(29)* |
|
|
|
10.17.1
|
|
Commitment Increase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2007 among Brightpoint, Inc. (and certain of its subsidiaries
identified therein), the guarantors identified therein, the lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A.,
as administrative agent(31) |
|
|
|
10.17.2
|
|
First Amendment dated July 31, 2007 to Credit Agreement dated February 16, 2007 by and among the Brightpoint, Inc.
(and certain of its subsidiaries identified therein), Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and book
manager, |
86
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
General Electric Capital Corporation, as syndication agent, ABN AMRO Bank N.V., as documentation agent,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as documentation agent, Bank of America, N.A., as administration agent, and the other
lenders party thereto. (34) |
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement for Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefit dated as of January 18, 2006 by and
between Robert J. Laikin and Brightpoint, Inc.(23)* |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement for Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefit dated as of January 18, 2006 by and
between J. Mark Howell and Brightpoint, Inc.(23)* |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement for Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefit dated as of January 18, 2006 by and
between Steven E. Fivel and Brightpoint, Inc.(23)* |
|
|
|
10.21
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Brightpoint, Inc. dated as of
April 7, 2005 between Brightpoint, Inc. and Robert J. Laikin(21)* |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Brightpoint, Inc. dated as of
April 7, 2005 between Brightpoint, Inc. and J. Mark Howell(21)* |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement Pursuant to the 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Brightpoint, Inc. dated as of
April 7, 2005 between Brightpoint, Inc. and Steven E. Fivel(21)* |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Employment Agreement between Brightpoint, Inc. and Vincent Donargo dated as of November 9, 2006(30)* |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Employment Agreement between Brightpoint, Inc. and Anthony W. Boor dated October 17, 2005(22)* |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Lease Agreement between the Brightpoint North America L.P. and Opus North Corporation, dated February 9, 2006(24) |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Lease Agreement between Brightpoint Services, LLC and Louisville United, LLC(27) |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Employment Agreement dated February 23, 2006 between Brightpoint Asia Limited and John Alexander Du Plessis
Currie(26)* |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated February 23, 2006 between Brightpoint, Inc. and John Alexander Du Plessis
Currie(26)* |
|
|
|
10.30
|
|
Termination Agreement effective as of January 1, 2006 terminating the Management Services Agreement by and between
Brightpoint Asia Limited and Persequor Limited originally dated as of August 7, 2002, as amended and extended on
July 1, 2004(26) |
|
|
|
10.31
|
|
Termination Agreement effective as of January 1, 2006 terminating the Management Services Agreement by and between
Brightpoint India Private Limited and Persequor Limited dated November 1, 2003, as amended(26) |
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
Escrow Agreement dated as of July 31, 2007 by and among Brightpoint, Inc., Dangaard Holding A/S and American Stock
Transfer and Trust Company, as escrow agent(34) |
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Brightpoint, Inc. and Michael K. Milland, effective as of October
1, 2007. (35) |
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
Relocation Agreement between Brightpoint, Inc. and Michael K. Milland, effective as of October 1, 2007. (35) |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries(36) |
|
|
|
23
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm(36) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(36) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(36) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(36) |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(36) |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Cautionary Statements(36) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed March 28, 1997 for the event dated February 20, 1997. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K filed April 1, 1998 for the event dated March 5, 1998. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1998. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix B filed with the Companys Proxy Statement dated
April 15, 1999 relating to its Annual Shareholders meeting held May 18, 1999. |
87
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with Form 10-K/A, Amendment No.
1 to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Tender Offer
Statement on Schedule TO dated August 31, 2001. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix E to Brightpoint, Inc.s Proxy Statement dated
April 26, 2004 relating to its Annual Stockholders meeting held June 3, 2004 |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix D to Brightpoint, Inc.s Proxy Statement dated
April 26, 2004 relating to its Annual Stockholders meeting held June 3, 2004 |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to Brightpoint, Inc.s Proxy Statement dated
April 26, 2004 relating to its Annual Stockholders meeting held June 3, 2004 |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed April 16, 2004 for the event dated April 12, 2004 |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report of Form 8-K filed June 3, 2004 for the event dated June 3, 2004 |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed October 5, 2004 for the event dated October 1, 2004 |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
(20) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed February 25, 2005 |
|
(21) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on April 12, 2005 |
|
(22) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on October 18, 2005 |
|
(23) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on January 20, 2006 |
|
(24) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2006 |
|
(25) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
(26) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 |
|
(27) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 |
|
(28) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on December 19, 2006 |
|
(29) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2007 |
|
(30) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on February 22, 2007 |
|
(31) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2007 |
|
(32) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 8, 2007 |
88
|
|
|
(33) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed as Annex A to the
Companys Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A dated June 20, 2007 |
|
(34) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on August 2, 2007 |
|
(35) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the applicable exhibit filed with the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2007 |
|
(36) |
|
Filed herewith |
|
* |
|
Denotes management compensation plan or arrangement. |
|
** |
|
Portions of this document have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment, which was granted
under Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
89
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brightpoint, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Laikin
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Laikin |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Date:
February 28, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert J. Laikin
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
February
28, 2008 |
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Director (Principal |
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony W. Boor
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
Officer
and Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vincent Donargo
|
|
Vice President, Corporate
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
Controller,
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JAN GESMAR-LARSEN
Jan Gesmar-Larsen
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ E liza H ermann
Eliza Hermann
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JORN P. JENSEN
Jorn P. Jensen
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ THORLEIF KRARUP
Thorleif Krarup
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ M arisa E. P ratt
Marisa E. Pratt
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R ichard W. R oedel
Richard W. Roedel
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ J erre L. S tead
Jerre L. Stead
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ K.P. W ilska
K.P. Wilska
|
|
Director
|
|
February 28, 2008 |
90
BRIGHTPOINT, INC.
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Col. A |
|
Col. B |
|
Col. C |
|
Col. D |
|
Col. E |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning |
|
Costs and |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
End |
Description |
|
of Period |
|
Expenses |
|
Accounts(1) |
|
Deductions |
|
of Period |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
4,926 |
|
|
$ |
2,992 |
|
|
$ |
9,424 |
|
|
$ |
(185 |
) |
|
$ |
17,157 |
|
Restructuring reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,661 |
|
|
|
19,361 |
|
|
|
(23,958 |
)(2) |
|
|
4,064 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,926 |
|
|
$ |
11,653 |
|
|
$ |
28,785 |
|
|
$ |
(24,143 |
) |
|
$ |
21,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
3,621 |
|
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
$ |
4,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
6,215 |
|
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,874 |
) |
|
$ |
3,621 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes allowance for doubtful accounts assumed in the acquisition of Dangaard Telecom
and additional liabilities recognized as liabilities assumed in the business combination
and included in the allocation of the acquisition costs in accordance with EITF 95-3,
Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchased Business Combination, as more
fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes $23.8 million of non-cash charges associated with the Companys decision to
terminate Dangaard Telecoms implementation of SAP enterprise resource planning (ERP) and
related software as more fully described in Notes 3 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
91