Central Federal Corp. 10KSB
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-25045
CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
34-1877137
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2923 Smith Road, Fairlawn, Ohio
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
44333
(Zip Code) |
(330) 666-7979
(Issuers Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act o
Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B
contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the
Exchange Act) YES o NO þ
The registrants revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $14.5 million.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by
non-affiliates as of March 15, 2007 was $27,687,000 based upon the closing price as reported on the
Nasdaq® Capital Market for that date.
As of March 15, 2007, there were 4,559,787 shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Rule 14a-3(b) Annual Report to Shareholders for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 and its Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
May 17, 2007, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on March
29, 2007, are incorporated herein by reference into Parts II and III, respectively, of this Form
10-KSB.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One): YES o NO þ
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-KSB contains forward-looking statements which may be identified by the use of such
words as may, believe, expect, anticipate, should, plan, estimate, predict,
continue and potential or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.
Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to
our financial condition, results of operations and business that are subject to various factors
which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include,
but are not limited to (i) general and local economic conditions, (ii) changes in interest rates,
deposit flows, demand for mortgages and other loans, real estate values and competition, (iii)
changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines, (iv) changes in legislation or regulation
and (v) other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technological factors affecting
our operations, pricing, products and services.
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Form 10-KSB and in any other public statements
we make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or
by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be
guaranteed and we caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly release revisions to any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
PART I
Item 1 Description of Business
General
Central Federal Corporation (the Company), formerly known as Grand Central Financial Corp., was
organized as a Delaware corporation in September 1998 as the holding company for CFBank, a
community-oriented savings institution which was originally organized in 1892, formerly known as
Central Federal Savings and Loan Association of Wellsville and more recently as Central Federal
Bank, in connection with CFBanks conversion from a mutual to stock form of organization. As used
herein, the terms we, us, our and the Company refer to Central Federal Corporation and its
subsidiaries, unless the context indicates to the contrary. As a savings and loan holding company,
we are subject to regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). Reserve Mortgage Services,
Inc. (Reserve), a wholly owned subsidiary of CFBank from October 2004 until May 12, 2005 when it
was merged into CFBank, was acquired in October 2004 to expand our mortgage services business.
Central Federal Capital Trust I (the Trust), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed
in 2003 to raise additional funding for the Company. Under accounting guidance in Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46, as revised in December 2003, the Trust is
not consolidated with the Company. Accordingly, the Company does not report the securities issued
by the Trust as liabilities, and instead reports as liabilities the subordinated debentures issued
by the Company and held by the Trust. Ghent Road, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,
was formed in 2006 and owns land adjacent to CFBanks Fairlawn office. Currently, we do not
transact any material business other than through CFBank and the Trust. At December 31, 2006,
assets totaled $236.0 million and stockholders equity totaled $29.1 million.
CFBank is a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to
meet the needs of the communities we serve. Our client-centric method of operation emphasizes
personalized service, clients access to decision makers, solution-driven lending and quick
execution, efficient use of
3
technology and the convenience of remote deposit, telephone banking, corporate cash management and
online internet banking. We attract deposits from the general public and use the deposits,
together with borrowings and other funds, primarily to originate commercial and commercial real
estate loans, single-family and multi-family residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of
credit. We also invest in consumer loans, construction and land loans and securities. In 2003, we
began originating more commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans than in
the past as part of our expansion into business financial services. Revenues are derived
principally from the generation of interest and fees on loans originated and, to a lesser extent,
interest and dividends on securities. Our primary sources of funds are retail savings deposits and
certificates of deposit and, to a lesser extent, brokered certificates of deposit, principal and
interest payments on loans and securities, Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances and other
borrowings and proceeds from the sale of loans. Our principal market area for loans and deposits
includes the following Ohio counties: Summit County through our office in Fairlawn, Ohio; Franklin
County through our office in Columbus, Ohio; and Columbiana County through our offices in Calcutta
and Wellsville, Ohio. We have a residential mortgage origination office in Akron, Ohio. We
originate commercial and conventional real estate loans and business loans throughout Ohio.
Market Area and Competition
Our primary market area is a competitive market for financial services and we face competition both
in making loans and in attracting deposits. Direct competition comes from a number of financial
institutions operating in our market area, many with a statewide or regional presence, and in some
cases, a national presence. Many of these financial institutions are significantly larger and have
greater financial resources than us. Competition for loans and deposits comes from savings
institutions, mortgage banking companies, commercial banks, credit unions, brokerage firms and
insurance companies.
Lending Activities
Loan Portfolio Composition. The loan portfolio consists primarily of mortgage loans secured by
single-family and multi-family residences and commercial real estate loans. At December 31, 2006,
gross loans receivable totaled $187.1 million. Commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family
mortgage loans totaled $126.6 million and represented 67.7% of the gross loan portfolio at December
31, 2006 compared to 57.7% at December 31, 2005 and 48.3% at December 31, 2004. The increase in
the percentage of commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans in the
portfolio was a result of the growth strategy implemented in 2003 to expand into business financial
services. Single-family residential mortgage loans totaled $30.2 million and represented 16.2% of
total gross loans at year-end 2006 compared to $23.6 million or 18.8% at year-end 2005 and $42.6
million or 39.0% at year-end 2004. The decline in single-family residential loans in 2005 was due
to a securitization of $18.6 million of these loans in June 2005. The remainder of the portfolio
consisted of consumer loans, which totaled $30.2 million, or 16.2% of gross loans receivable at
year-end 2006.
The types of loans originated are subject to federal and state law and regulations. Interest rates
charged on loans are affected by the demand for such loans, the supply of money available for
lending purposes and the rates offered by competitors. In turn, these factors are affected by,
among other things, economic conditions, fiscal policies of the federal government, monetary
policies of the Federal Reserve Board and legislative tax policies.
4
The following table sets forth the composition of the loan portfolio in dollar amounts and as a
percentage of the portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
of Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate mortgage loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family |
|
$ |
30,209 |
|
|
|
16.15 |
% |
|
$ |
23,627 |
|
|
|
18.81 |
% |
|
$ |
42,577 |
|
|
|
38.97 |
% |
Multi-family |
|
|
47,247 |
|
|
|
25.25 |
% |
|
|
30,206 |
|
|
|
24.04 |
% |
|
|
25,602 |
|
|
|
23.43 |
% |
Commercial real estate |
|
|
47,474 |
|
|
|
25.37 |
% |
|
|
25,937 |
|
|
|
20.64 |
% |
|
|
20,105 |
|
|
|
18.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
mortgage loans |
|
|
124,930 |
|
|
|
66.77 |
% |
|
|
79,770 |
|
|
|
63.49 |
% |
|
|
88,284 |
|
|
|
80.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
% |
Home equity lines of credit |
|
|
22,148 |
|
|
|
11.84 |
% |
|
|
23,852 |
|
|
|
18.98 |
% |
|
|
5,928 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
Automobile |
|
|
6,448 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
4,237 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
6,735 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
% |
Other |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
30,246 |
|
|
|
16.17 |
% |
|
|
29,540 |
|
|
|
23.50 |
% |
|
|
13,952 |
|
|
|
12.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
31,913 |
|
|
|
17.06 |
% |
|
|
16,347 |
|
|
|
13.01 |
% |
|
|
7,030 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable |
|
|
187,089 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
125,657 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
109,266 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan fees |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(2,109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
184,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
124,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate mortgage loans include $4,454, $1,466 and $9,774 in construction loans at year-end 2006, 2005 and
2004.
5
Loan Maturity. The following table shows the remaining contractual maturity of the loan
portfolio at December 31, 2006. Demand loans and other loans having no stated schedule of
repayments or no stated maturity are reported as due within one year. The table does not include
potential prepayments or scheduled principal amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
9,676 |
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
$ |
21,802 |
|
|
$ |
32,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than one year to three years |
|
|
8,519 |
|
|
|
2,131 |
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
More than three years to five
years |
|
|
12,122 |
|
|
|
4,781 |
|
|
|
3,072 |
|
|
|
19,975 |
|
More than five years to 10 years |
|
|
44,596 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
50,128 |
|
More than 10 years to 15 years |
|
|
20,397 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
21,723 |
|
More than 15 years |
|
|
29,620 |
|
|
|
20,077 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
49,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total due after 2007 |
|
|
115,254 |
|
|
|
29,244 |
|
|
|
10,111 |
|
|
|
154,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount due |
|
$ |
124,930 |
|
|
$ |
30,246 |
|
|
$ |
31,913 |
|
|
$ |
187,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth at December 31, 2006, the dollar amount of total loans
receivable contractually due after December 31, 2007, and whether such loans have fixed interest
rates or adjustable interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Adjustable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate mortgage loans |
|
$ |
42,281 |
|
|
$ |
72,973 |
|
|
$ |
115,254 |
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
7,447 |
|
|
|
21,797 |
|
|
|
29,244 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
6,438 |
|
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
10,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
56,166 |
|
|
$ |
98,443 |
|
|
$ |
154,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Origination of Loans. Lending activities are conducted through our offices. In 2003, we
began originating commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans to take
advantage of opportunities for expansion into business financial services and growth in the
Fairlawn and Columbus, Ohio markets. These loans are predominantly adjustable rate loans. A
majority of our single-family mortgage loan originations are fixed-rate loans. Current
originations of long-term fixed-rate single-family mortgages are generally sold rather than
retained in portfolio. Although the decision to sell current single-family mortgage originations
rather than retain the loans in portfolio has resulted in declining single-family loan portfolio
balances and lower earnings from that portfolio in the near term, it protects future profitability,
and we believe it is not prudent to retain all of these long-term, fixed-rate loan originations and
subject our performance to the interest rate risk and reduced future earnings associated with a
rise in interest rates. In a transaction with Freddie Mac in the second quarter of 2005, we
securitized single-family residential mortgage loans held in our portfolio with an outstanding
principal balance of $18.6 million, reducing single-family mortgage loan balances. The
securitization increased
6
liquidity as the securities retained were readily marketable, eliminated credit risk on the loans
and reduced CFBanks risk-based capital requirement. Although we currently expect that most of the
long-term fixed-rate mortgage loan originations will continue to be sold on a servicing-released
basis, a portion of the loans may be retained for portfolio within our interest rate risk and
profitability guidelines.
Single-Family Mortgage Lending. A significant lending activity has been the origination of
permanent conventional mortgage loans secured by single-family residences located predominantly in
our primary market area. We currently sell substantially all of the fixed-rate single-family
mortgage loans that we originate on a servicing released basis. Prior to 2004, servicing rights
were generally retained on loans sold. Most single-family mortgage loans are underwritten
according to Freddie Mac guidelines. Loan originations are obtained from our loan officers and
their contacts with the local real estate industry, existing or past customers, and members of the
local communities. At December 31, 2006, single-family mortgage loans totaled $30.2 million, or
16.2% of total loans, of which $13.7 million, or 45.5% were fixed-rate loans.
Our policy is to originate single-family residential mortgage loans in amounts up to 80% of the
appraised value of the property securing the loan and up to 95% of the appraised value if private
mortgage insurance is obtained. Mortgage loans generally include due-on-sale clauses which provide
us with the contractual right to deem the loan immediately due and payable in the event the
borrower transfers ownership of the property without our consent. Due-on-sale clauses are an
important means of adjusting the rates on the fixed-rate mortgage loan portfolio, and we exercise
our rights under these clauses. The single-family mortgage loan originations are generally for
terms to maturity of up to 30 years.
We offer several adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loan programs with terms of up to 30 years and
interest rates that adjust with a maximum adjustment limitation of 2.0% per year and a 6.0%
lifetime cap. The interest rate adjustments on ARM loans currently offered are indexed to a
variety of established indices and these loans do not provide for initial deep discount interest
rates or for negative amortization.
The volume and types of single-family ARM loans originated have been affected by such market
factors as the level of interest rates, consumer preferences, competition and the availability of
funds. In recent years, demand for single-family ARM loans in our primary market area has been
weak due to the low interest rate environment and consumer preference for fixed-rate loans.
Consequently, in recent years our origination of ARM loans on single-family residential properties
has not been significant as compared to our origination of fixed-rate loans.
Commercial and Multi-Family Real Estate Lending. Beginning in 2003, we expanded into business
financial services and positioned ourselves for growth in the Fairlawn and Columbus, Ohio markets
and, as a result, originations of commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage
loans increased significantly. Commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans
totaled $94.7 million at December 31, 20006 or 50.6% of gross loans, an increase of $38.6 million
or 68.8% from $56.1 million at December 31, 2005 or 44.7% of gross loans, and an increase of $49.0
million or 107.2% from $45.7 million or 41.8% of gross loans at December 31, 2004. We anticipate
that commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage lending activities will continue
to grow in the future as we continue to execute our strategic growth plan.
We originate commercial real estate loans that are secured by properties used for business
purposes, such as manufacturing facilities, office buildings or retail facilities. Commercial real
estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans are secured by properties generally located in
our primary market area. Underwriting policies provide that commercial real estate and
multi-family residential mortgage loans may be made in amounts up to 80% of the appraised value of
the property. In underwriting commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans,
we consider the appraisal value and net operating income of the property, the debt service ratio
and the property owners financial strength, expertise and credit history.
7
Commercial real estate and multi-family residential mortgage loans are generally considered to
involve a greater degree of risk than single-family residential mortgage loans. Because payments
on loans secured by commercial real estate and multi-family properties are dependent on successful
operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater
extent to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. We seek to minimize these
risks through underwriting policies which require such loans to be qualified at origination on the
basis of the propertys income and debt coverage ratio and the financial strength of the owners.
Commercial Lending. Expansion into business financial services in 2003 also resulted in increased
originations of commercial loans. Commercial loans totaled $31.9 million, or 17.1% of gross loans
at December 31, 2006, an increase of $15.6 million or 95.7% from $16.3 million, or 13.0% of gross
loans at December 31, 2005, and an increase of $24.9 million or 355.7% from $7.0 million or 6.4% of
gross loans at December 31, 2004. We anticipate that commercial lending activities will continue
to grow in the future.
We make commercial business loans primarily to small businesses that are generally secured by
business equipment, inventory, accounts receivable and other business assets. In underwriting
commercial loans, we consider the net operating income of the company, the debt service ratio and
the financial strength, expertise and credit history of the owners.
Commercial loans are generally considered to involve a greater degree of risk than loans secured by
real estate. Because payments on commercial loans are dependent on successful operation of the
business enterprise, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent to adverse
conditions in the economy. We seek to minimize these risks through underwriting policies which
require such loans to be qualified at origination on the basis of the enterprises income and debt
coverage ratio and the financial strength of the owners.
Construction and Land Lending. To a lesser extent, we originate construction and land development
loans in our primary market areas. Construction loans are made to finance the construction of
residential and commercial properties. Construction loans are fixed or adjustable-rate loans which
may convert to permanent loans with maturities of up to 30 years. Policies provide that
construction loans may be made in amounts up to 80% of the appraised value of the property, and an
independent appraisal of the property is required. Loan proceeds are disbursed in increments as
construction progresses and as inspections warrant and regular inspections are required to monitor
the progress of construction. Land loans are determined on an individual basis, but generally they
do not exceed 75% of the actual cost or current appraised value of the property, whichever is less.
Construction and land financing is considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than
long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan
is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the propertys value at
completion of construction or development compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of
construction. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted with a
project, when completed, having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment.
Consumer and Other Lending. The consumer loan portfolio generally consists of home equity lines of
credit, automobile loans, home equity and home improvement loans and loans secured by deposits. At
December 31, 2006, the consumer loan portfolio totaled $30.2 million, or 16.2% of gross loans
receivable.
Home equity lines of credit comprise the majority of consumer loan balances and totaled $22.1
million at December 31, 2006. We offer a variable rate home equity line of credit with rates
adjusting monthly at up to 2% above the prime rate of interest as disclosed in The Wall Street
Journal. The amount of the line
8
is based on the borrowers income and equity in the home. When combined with the balance of the
prior mortgage liens, these lines generally may not exceed 100% of the appraised value of the
property at the time of the loan commitment. These loans are secured by a subordinate lien on the
underlying real estate.
Prior to 2003, we were in the business of making indirect automobile loans and loans secured by
automobiles declined to $6.7 million or 6.2% of total loans at year-end 2004. We no longer
originate indirect automobile loans and make few direct automobile loans. In 2005, we purchased
$5.1 million in auto loans and, as a result, balances increased to $6.4 million, or 3.5% of total
loans at December 31, 2006 compared to $4.2 million or 3.4% of total loans at December 31, 2005.
Delinquencies and Classified Assets. The Board of Directors monitors the status of all delinquent
loans thirty days or more past due, past due statistics and trends for all loans monthly.
Procedures with respect to resolving delinquencies vary depending on the nature and type of the
loan and period of delinquency. In general, we make every effort, consistent with safety and
soundness principles, to work with the borrower to have the loan brought current. If the loan is
not brought current, it then becomes necessary to repossess collateral and/or take legal action.
Federal regulations and CFBanks asset classification policy require use of an internal asset
classification system as a means of reporting and monitoring assets. We have incorporated the OTS
internal asset classifications as a part of our credit monitoring system. In accordance with
regulations, problem assets are classified as substandard, doubtful or loss and the
classifications are subject to review by the OTS. An asset is considered substandard under the
regulations if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the
obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. An asset considered doubtful under the regulations
has all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic
that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets considered loss under
the regulations are those considered uncollectible and having so little value that their
continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss allowance is not warranted.
Assets are required to be designated special mention when they posses weaknesses but do not
currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of
these categories. In order to more closely monitor credit risk as we employ our growth strategy in
business financial services, we have developed internal loan review procedures and a credit grading
system for commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans, and also utilize an
independent, external firm for loan review annually.
At December 31, 2006, $965,000 in assets were designated as special mention, representing one
commercial real estate loan; $460,000 in assets were classified as substandard, including $288,000
in single-family mortgage loans, $163,000 in commercial loans and $9,000 in auto loans; and no
assets were classified as doubtful or loss.
9
The following table sets forth information concerning delinquent loans in dollar amounts and as a
percentage of the total loan portfolio. The amounts presented represent the total remaining
principal balances of the loans rather than the actual payment amounts which are overdue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days or More |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
of |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
of |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
of |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
of |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
of |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity loans and lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent loans |
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquent loans as a percent of
total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26 |
% |
The table does not include delinquent loans less than 60 days past due. At December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
total loans past due 30 to 59 days totaled $1,533,000, $859,000 and $549,000, respectively.
10
Nonperforming Assets. The following table contains information regarding nonperforming loans
and real estate owned (REO). At December 31, 2006, nonperforming loans totaled $297,000. CFBanks
policy is to stop accruing interest on loans 90 days or more past due and set up reserves for all
previously accrued interest. At December 31, 2006, the amount of additional interest income that
would have been recognized on nonaccrual loans, if such loans had continued to perform in
accordance with their contractual terms, was approximately $16,000. At December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, there were no impaired loans or troubled debt restructurings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Nonaccrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family real estate |
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(1) |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
Real estate owned (REO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets(2) |
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
0.26 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total nonaccrual loans equal total nonperforming loans. |
|
(2) |
|
Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and REO. |
Allowance for Loan Losses. Management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses
regularly through reviews of the performance of the loan portfolio considering economic conditions,
changes in interest rates and the effect of such changes on real estate values and changes in the
composition of the loan portfolio. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans for which
full collectibility may not be reasonably assured, considers, among other matters, the estimated
fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical loan loss experience,
changes in the size and growth of the loan portfolio and other factors that warrant recognition in
providing for an adequate loan loss allowance. The allowance for loan losses is established
through a provision for loan losses based on managements evaluation of the risk in its loan
portfolio. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of the examination process,
periodically review the allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require additional provisions
for loan losses based upon information available at the time of the review. At December 31, 2006,
the allowance for loan losses totaled 1.13% of total loans as compared to 1.19% at December 31,
2005.
The OTS, in conjunction with the other federal banking agencies, has adopted an interagency policy
statement on the allowance for loan and lease losses. The policy statement provides guidance for
financial institutions on both the responsibilities of management for the assessment and
establishment of adequate allowances in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
and guidance for banking agency examiners to use in evaluating the allowances. The policy
statement requires that institutions have effective systems and controls to identify, monitor and
address asset quality problems; that management analyze all significant factors that affect the
collectibility of the portfolio in a reasonable manner; and that management establish acceptable
allowance evaluation processes that meet the objectives set forth in the policy statement. CFBank
adopted an Allowance for Loan Losses Policy designed to provide a thorough, disciplined and
consistently applied process that incorporates managements current judgments about the credit
quality of the loan portfolio into determination of the
11
allowance for loan losses in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
supervisory guidance. Management believes that an adequate allowance for loan losses has been
established. However, actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further
additions to the level of allowances for estimated loan losses may become necessary.
The following table sets forth activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family real estate |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Recoveries on loans previously charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family real estate |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses, end of period |
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.13 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
.90 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
710.10 |
% |
|
|
186.88 |
% |
|
|
341.96 |
% |
Net charge-offs to the allowance for losses |
|
|
9.77 |
% |
|
|
10.50 |
% |
|
|
8.49 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
.13 |
% |
|
|
.14 |
% |
|
|
.10 |
% |
Expansion into business financial services and the significant growth in commercial,
commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage loans during 2004 through 2006 required an
increase in the provision and allowance for loan losses related to these loan types. The provision
for loan losses totaled $820,000 in 2006 compared to $674,000 in 2005 and $646,000 in 2004. At
December 31, 2006, the allowance for commercial, commercial real estate and multi-family mortgage
loans totaled $1.9 million, an increase of $628,000 from $1.3 million at December 31, 2005 and $1.1
million from $862,000 at December 31, 2004 as these loan types grew from 48.3% at year-end 2004 to
67.7% at year-end 2006. These loans tend to be larger balance, higher risk loans and, as a result,
92.3% of the allowance was allocated to these loan types at December 31, 2006.
12
The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses in each of the categories listed
at the dates indicated and the percentage of such amounts to the total allowance and loans in each
category as a percent of total loans. Although the allowance may be allocated to specific loans or
loan types, the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in managements judgment, should
be charged-off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Total |
|
|
to Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Total |
|
|
to Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Total |
|
|
to Total |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single-family mortgage loans |
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
|
16.15 |
% |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
18.81 |
% |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
|
.41 |
% |
|
|
38.97 |
% |
Consumer loans |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
% |
|
|
16.17 |
% |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
8.03 |
% |
|
|
23.50 |
% |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
11.45 |
% |
|
|
12.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, commercial real
estate and multi-family mortgage
loans |
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
92.27 |
% |
|
|
67.68 |
% |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
88.16 |
% |
|
|
57.69 |
% |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
88.14 |
% |
|
|
48.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
1,495 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
978 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Real Estate Owned
At December 31, 2006, there was no real estate owned. Assets acquired through or instead of loan
foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. If
fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense.
Costs after acquisition are expensed.
Investment Activities
Federally chartered savings institutions have the authority to invest in various types of liquid
assets, including United States Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies,
certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, bankers acceptances and federal
funds. Subject to various restrictions, federally chartered savings institutions may also invest
their assets in commercial paper, municipal bonds, investment-grade corporate debt securities and
mutual funds whose assets conform to the investments that a federally chartered savings institution
is otherwise authorized to make directly.
The investment policy established by the Board of Directors is designed to provide and maintain
liquidity, generate a favorable return on investments without incurring undue interest rate and
credit risk, and complement lending activities. The policy provides authority to invest in United
States Treasury and federal agency securities meeting the policys guidelines, mortgage-backed
securities guaranteed by the U.S. government and agencies thereof, and municipal bonds. To improve
liquidity and eliminate the credit risk associated with mortgages held in our portfolio, we
securitized single-family residential mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance of $18.6
million in a transaction with Freddie Mac in 2005. The securitization (i) increased liquidity as
the securities retained were readily marketable, (ii) eliminated credit risk on the loans and (iii)
reduced CFBanks risk-based capital requirement. At December 31, 2006, the securities portfolio
totaled $29.3 million.
At December 31, 2006, all mortgage-backed securities in the securities portfolio were insured or
guaranteed by Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.
14
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost and fair value of
securities at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency |
|
$ |
6,005 |
|
|
$ |
5,883 |
|
|
$ |
6,007 |
|
|
$ |
5,838 |
|
|
$ |
5,018 |
|
|
$ |
4,983 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
21,345 |
|
|
|
21,464 |
|
|
|
22,803 |
|
|
|
23,047 |
|
|
|
8,398 |
|
|
|
8,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
|
29,364 |
|
|
|
29,326 |
|
|
|
30,830 |
|
|
|
30,872 |
|
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
13,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on
securities available for sale |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities |
|
$ |
29,326 |
|
|
$ |
29,326 |
|
|
$ |
30,872 |
|
|
$ |
30,872 |
|
|
$ |
13,508 |
|
|
$ |
13,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the carrying value, weighted average
yields and contractual maturities of securities available for sale as of December 31, 2006. Yields
are stated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year to |
|
|
More than Five Years to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
More than Ten Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal agency |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,883 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,883 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
State and municipal |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
% |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,979 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
% |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
2,924 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
18,159 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
21,464 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities at fair value |
|
$ |
1,107 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
$ |
7,137 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
% |
|
$ |
2,924 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
$ |
18,159 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
$ |
29,326 |
|
|
|
5.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Sources of Funds
General. Primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and
securities, borrowings, and funds generated from operations of the Bank. Contractual loan payments
are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments
are significantly influenced by general market interest rates and economic conditions. Borrowings
may be used on a short-term basis for liquidity purposes or on a long-term basis to fund asset
growth.
Deposits. CFBank offers a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms
including savings accounts, retail and business checking accounts, money market accounts and
certificates of deposit. Management regularly evaluates the internal cost of funds, surveys rates
offered by competitors, reviews cash flow requirements for lending and liquidity and executes rate
changes when necessary as part of its asset/liability management, profitability and growth
objectives. For the year ended December 31, 2006, certificates of deposit constituted 56.9% of
total average deposits. The term of the certificates of deposit offered vary from seven days to
five years at rates established by management. Specific terms of an individual account vary
according to the type of account, the minimum balance required, the time period funds must remain
on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. The flow of deposits is influenced
significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market rates, prevailing interest
rates and competition. At December 31, 2006, certificate accounts maturing in less than one year
totaled $77.3 million. Most of these accounts are expected to be reinvested and we do not believe
that there is any material risk associated with the respective maturities of these certificates.
We rely primarily on a willingness to pay market-competitive interest rates to attract and retain
retail deposits. Accordingly, rates offered by competing financial institutions affect our ability
to attract and retain deposits. Deposits are obtained predominantly from the areas in which CFBank
offices are located, and brokered deposits are accepted. We consider brokered deposits to be a
useful element of a diversified funding strategy and an alternative to borrowings. Management
regularly compares rates on brokered certificates of deposit with other funding sources in order to
determine the best mix of funding sources balancing the costs of funding with the mix of
maturities. At December 31, 2006, brokered deposits totaled $30.5 million.
Certificate accounts in amounts of $100,000 or more totaled $44.6 million at December 31, 2006,
maturing as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
Maturity Period |
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Three months or less |
|
$ |
10,055 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
% |
Over 3 through 6 months |
|
|
9,264 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
Over 6 through 12 months |
|
|
12,271 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
Over 12 months |
|
|
13,001 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
44,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
The following table sets forth the distribution of average deposit account balances for the
periods indicated and the weighted average interest rates on each category of deposits presented.
Averages for the periods presented are based on month-end balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-bearing checking
accounts |
|
$ |
9,522 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
2.16 |
% |
|
$ |
11,321 |
|
|
|
9.59 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
$ |
11,602 |
|
|
|
13.82 |
% |
|
|
.58 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
31,754 |
|
|
|
21.25 |
% |
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
23,202 |
|
|
|
19.65 |
% |
|
|
3.01 |
% |
|
|
10,688 |
|
|
|
12.73 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
12,770 |
|
|
|
8.55 |
% |
|
|
.60 |
% |
|
|
16,121 |
|
|
|
13.65 |
% |
|
|
.61 |
% |
|
|
18,730 |
|
|
|
22.30 |
% |
|
|
.57 |
% |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
85,010 |
|
|
|
56.88 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
59,957 |
|
|
|
50.78 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
39,285 |
|
|
|
46.78 |
% |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
Noninterest-bearing deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
10,386 |
|
|
|
6.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
$ |
149,442 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
3.80 |
% |
|
$ |
118,072 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
$ |
83,979 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents by various rate categories, the amount of certificate accounts
outstanding at the dates indicated and the periods to maturity of the certificate accounts
outstanding at December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period to Maturity from December 31, 2006 |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
One to Two |
|
|
Two to Three |
|
|
Over Three |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Certificate accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 1.99% |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
4,273 |
|
|
$ |
11,847 |
|
2.00 to 2.99% |
|
|
4,614 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,696 |
|
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
17,555 |
|
3.00 to 3.99% |
|
|
7,996 |
|
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
11,955 |
|
|
|
21,376 |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
4.00 to 4.99% |
|
|
15,870 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
19,250 |
|
|
|
34,676 |
|
|
|
6,273 |
|
5.00 to 5.99% |
|
|
48,832 |
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
8,393 |
|
|
|
61,537 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
6.00% and above |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificate accounts |
|
$ |
77,332 |
|
|
$ |
6,800 |
|
|
$ |
4,245 |
|
|
$ |
9,081 |
|
|
$ |
97,458 |
|
|
$ |
68,627 |
|
|
$ |
46,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Borrowings. FHLB advances are used as an alternative to retail deposits to fund operations as
part of our operating strategy. The advances are collateralized primarily by certain mortgage
loans, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate loans and mortgage-backed securities and
secondarily by investment in capital stock of the FHLB. FHLB advances are made pursuant to several
credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. The maximum
amount that the FHLB will advance to member institutions fluctuates from time to time in accordance
with the policies of the FHLB.
The Company obtained a $5.0 million line of credit with a commercial bank in 2006. Interest on the
line is at the fed funds rate plus .63%. There was no outstanding balance at year-end 2006.
A revolving line of credit with an unaffiliated bank acquired in the Reserve acquisition in 2004
provided financing primarily for single-family mortgage loan originations and was collateralized by
loans held for sale. This line of credit was repaid and closed in 2005.
In 2003, we formed the Trust, which issued $5.0 million of 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) plus 2.85% floating rate trust preferred securities as part of a pooled private offering of
such securities. We issued $5.2 million of subordinated debentures to the Trust in exchange for
ownership of all of the common stock of the Trust and the proceeds of the preferred securities sold
by the Trust. The subordinated debentures mature on December 30, 2033 and we may redeem the
subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, at par plus accrued and unpaid interest, any time
after December 30, 2008. We have the option to defer interest payments on the subordinated
debentures from time to time for a period not to exceed five consecutive years. There are no
required payments on the subordinated debentures over the next 5 years. Under FASB Interpretation
No. 46, as revised in December 2003, the Trust is not consolidated with the Company. Accordingly,
we do not report the securities issued by the Trust as liabilities, and instead report the
subordinated debentures issued by the Company and held by the Trust as liabilities.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding borrowed funds at or for the periods
ended on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
FHLB advances and other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance outstanding |
|
$ |
33,201 |
|
|
$ |
24,860 |
|
|
$ |
31,265 |
|
Maximum amount outstanding at any month-end
during the period |
|
|
41,604 |
|
|
|
47,062 |
|
|
|
48,574 |
|
Balance outstanding at end of period |
|
|
37,675 |
|
|
|
28,150 |
|
|
|
48,574 |
|
Weighted average interest rate during the period |
|
|
4.85 |
% |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
5.28 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
Subsidiary Activities
As of December 31, 2006, we maintained CFBank, Ghent Road, Inc. and the Trust as wholly owned
subsidiaries.
Personnel
As of December 31, 2006, we had 57 full-time and five part-time employees.
19
Regulation and Supervision
General. CFBank is a federally-chartered savings association. It is subject to regulation,
examination and supervision by the OTS and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as its
deposit insurer. CFBanks deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC through
the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). The FDIC merged the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings
Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) to form the DIF on March 31, 2006, in accordance with the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005. CFBank also is a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, which is
one of the 12 regional FHLBs. CFBank must file reports with the OTS concerning its activities and
financial condition, and must obtain regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain
transactions, such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other depository institutions. The OTS
conducts periodic examinations to assess CFBanks compliance with various regulatory requirements.
This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which a
savings association can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund
and depositors. Under the holding company form of organization, the Company is also required to
file certain reports with, and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of the OTS and of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) under the federal securities laws.
The OTS and the FDIC have significant discretion in connection with their supervisory and
enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the
classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory
purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the OTS, the FDIC, the Commission or the United
States Congress, could have a material adverse impact on the Company, CFBank and our operations and
shareholders. The following discussion is intended to be a summary of the material statutes and
regulations applicable to savings associations and their holding companies, but it does not purport
to be a comprehensive description of all such statutes and regulations.
Regulation of Federal Savings Associations
Business Activities. CFBank derives its lending and investment powers from the Home Owners Loan
Act, as amended (HOLA), and OTS regulations. Under these laws and regulations, CFBank may invest
in mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans,
certain types of debt securities and certain other assets. CFBank may also establish service
corporations that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for CFBank, including certain
real estate equity investments and securities and insurance brokerage activities. CFBanks
authority to invest in certain types of loans or other investments is limited by federal law.
Loans to One Borrower. CFBank is generally subject to the same limits on loans to one borrower as
is a national bank. With specified exceptions, CFBanks total loans or extensions of credit to a
single borrower cannot exceed 15% of CFBanks unimpaired capital and surplus, which does not
include accumulated other comprehensive income. CFBank may lend additional amounts up to 10% of
its unimpaired capital and surplus which does not include accumulated other comprehensive income,
if the loans or extensions of credit are fully-secured by readily marketable collateral. CFBank
currently complies with applicable loans-to-one-borrower limitations.
QTL Test. The HOLA requires that CFBank, as a savings association, comply with the qualified thrift
lender (QTL) test. Under the QTL test, CFBank is required to maintain at least 65% of its
portfolio assets in certain qualified thrift investments for at least nine months of the most
recent twelve-month period. Portfolio assets means, in general, CFBanks total assets less the
sum of (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, (ii) goodwill and other intangible
assets and (iii) the value of property used to conduct
20
CFBanks business. CFBank may also satisfy the QTL test by qualifying as a domestic building and
loan association as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). CFBank
met the QTL test at December 31, 2006 and in each of the prior 12 months, and, therefore, qualified
as a thrift lender. If CFBank fails the QTL test, it must either operate under certain
restrictions on its activities or convert to a national bank charter.
Capital Requirements. The OTS regulations require savings associations to meet three minimum
capital standards: (i) a tangible capital ratio requirement of 1.5% of total assets as adjusted
under the OTS regulations; (ii) a leverage ratio requirement of 3.0% of core capital to such
adjusted total assets, if a savings association has been assigned the highest composite rating of 1
under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System; and (iii) a risk-based capital ratio
requirement of 8.0% of core and supplementary capital to total risk-based assets. The minimum
leverage capital ratio for any other depository institution that does not have a composite rating
of 1 will be 4%, unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular
circumstances or risk profile of the depository institution. In determining the amount of
risk-weighted assets for purposes of the risk-based capital requirement, a savings association must
compute its risk-based assets by multiplying its assets and certain off-balance sheet items by risk
weights, which range from 0% for cash and obligations issued by the United States Government or its
agencies to 100% for consumer and commercial loans, as assigned by the OTS capital regulation based
on the risks found by the OTS to be inherent in the type of asset.
Tangible capital is defined, generally, as common shareholders equity (including retained
earnings), certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related earnings, minority
interests in equity accounts of fully consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles (other than
certain mortgage servicing rights), and investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in
activities not permissible for a national bank. Core capital is defined similarly to tangible
capital, but core capital also includes certain qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain
purchased credit card relationships. Supplementary capital currently includes cumulative and other
preferred stock, mandatory convertible debt securities, subordinated debt and intermediate
preferred stock and the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, up to 45% of unrealized
gains on available-for-sale equity securities with a readily determinable fair value may be
included in tier 2 capital. The allowance for loan and lease losses includable in supplementary
capital is limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, and the amount of supplementary
capital that may be included as total capital cannot exceed the amount of core capital. At
December 31, 2006, CFBank met each of its capital requirements, in each case on a fully phased-in
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess |
|
Capital |
|
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
(Deficiency) |
|
Actual |
|
Required |
|
|
Capital |
|
Capital |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Percent |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Tangible |
|
$ |
22,863 |
|
|
$ |
3,503 |
|
|
$ |
19,360 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core (Leverage) |
|
|
22,863 |
|
|
|
9,342 |
|
|
|
13,521 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-based |
|
|
24,972 |
|
|
|
15,915 |
|
|
|
9,057 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
21
Capital Distributions. OTS regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by savings
institutions, such as cash dividends, payments to repurchase or otherwise acquire the savings
institutions shares, payments to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger and
other distributions charged against capital. The rule establishes three tiers of institutions,
which are based primarily on an institutions capital level. An institution that exceeds all fully
phased-in capital requirements before and after a proposed capital distribution (Tier 1 Bank) and
that has not been advised by the OTS that it is in need of more than normal supervision, could,
after prior notice, but without obtaining approval of the OTS, make capital distributions during a
calendar year equal to the greater of (i) 100% of its net earnings to date during the calendar year
plus the amount that would reduce by one-half its surplus capital ratio (the excess capital over
its fully phased-in capital requirements) at the beginning of the calendar year or (ii) 75% of its
net earnings for the previous four quarters. Any additional capital distributions would require
prior regulatory approval. In the event CFBanks capital fell below its regulatory requirements or
the OTS notified it that it was in need of more than normal supervision, CFBanks ability to make
capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the OTS could prohibit a proposed capital
distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the OTS
determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. At December 31,
2006, CFBank was classified as a Tier 1 Bank.
Under OTS capital distribution regulations, an application to and the prior approval of the OTS is
required before an institution makes a capital distribution if (i) the institution does not meet
certain criteria for expedited treatment for applications under the regulations, (ii) the total
capital distributions by the institution for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus
the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, (iii) the institution would be
undercapitalized following the distribution or (iv) the distribution would otherwise be contrary to
a statute, regulation or agreement with the OTS. If an application is not required, the institution
may still need to give advance notice to the OTS of the capital distribution. The Companys ability
to pay dividends, service debt obligations and repurchase common stock is dependent upon receipt of
dividend payments from CFBank.
Branching. OTS regulations permit federally-chartered savings associations to branch nationwide
under certain conditions. Generally, federal savings associations may establish interstate networks
and geographically diversify their loan portfolios and lines of business. The OTS authority
preempts any state law purporting to regulate branching by federal savings associations.
Community Reinvestment. Under the Community Reinvestment Act (the CRA), as implemented by OTS
regulations, a savings association has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its
safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and
moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or
programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institutions discretion to develop the
types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community,
consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the OTS, in connection with its examination of a savings
association, to assess the associations record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to
take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by the association. The
CRA also requires each institution to publicly disclose its CRA rating. CFBanks CRA rating based
on the latest assessment by the OTS was satisfactory.
The CRA regulations establish an assessment system that bases an associations rating on its actual
performance in meeting community needs. In particular, the assessment system focuses on three
tests: (i) a lending test, to evaluate the institutions record of making loans in its assessment
areas; (ii) an investment test, to evaluate the institutions record of investing in community
development projects, affordable housing and programs benefiting low- or moderate-income
individuals and businesses; and (iii) a service test, to evaluate the institutions delivery of
services through its branches, ATMs and other offices.
22
Transactions with Related Parties. CFBanks authority to engage in transactions with related
parties or affiliates (i.e., any company that controls or is under common control with an
institution, including the Company and any non-savings institution subsidiaries that the Company
may establish) is limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act (FRA). Section 23A
restricts the aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate to 10% of the
capital and surplus of the savings institution and also limits the aggregate amount of transactions
with all affiliates to 20% of the savings institutions capital and surplus. Certain transactions
with affiliates are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in
Section 23A and the purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited. Section
23B generally requires that certain transactions with affiliates, including loans and asset
purchases, must be on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that are
substantially the same or at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time
for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. A savings association also is prohibited
from extending credit to any affiliate engaged in activities not permitted for a bank holding
company and may not purchase the securities of an affiliate (other than a subsidiary).
Section 22(h) of the FRA restricts a savings association with respect to loans to directors,
executive officers and principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h), loans to directors, executive
officers and stockholders who control, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of voting securities of
a savings association, and certain related interests of any of the foregoing, may not exceed,
together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated entities, the savings
associations total unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(h) also prohibits any
loan above amounts prescribed by the appropriate federal banking agency to directors, executive
officers, and stockholders who directly or indirectly control 10% or more of voting securities of a
stock savings association, and their respective related interests, unless such loan is approved in
advance by a majority of the board of directors of the savings association. Any interested
director may not participate in the voting. The loan amount (which includes all other outstanding
loans to such person) as to which such prior board of director approval is required, is the greater
of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus. Furthermore, any loan, when aggregated with all other
extensions of credit to that person, which exceeds $500,000, must receive prior approval by the
board. Further, pursuant to Section 22(h), loans to directors, executive officers and principal
stockholders must be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to
other persons except for extensions of credit made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program
that is widely available to the institutions employees and does not give preference to insiders
over other employees. Section 22(g) of the FRA places additional limitations on loans to executive
officers.
Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) prohibits the extension of
personal loans to directors and executive officers of issuers. The prohibition, however, does not
apply to mortgages advanced by an insured depository institution, such as CFBank, which are subject
to the insider lending restrictions of Section 22(h) of the FRA.
Enforcement. The OTS has primary enforcement responsibility over savings associations, including
CFBank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money
penalties, to issue cease and desist orders and to remove directors and officers. In general,
these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and to
unsafe or unsound practices.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Under federal law, the OTS has adopted a set of guidelines
prescribing safety and soundness standards. These guidelines establish general standards relating
to internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit
underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings standards,
compensation, fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require appropriate systems and
practices to identify and manage
23
the risks and exposures specified in the guidelines. In addition, the OTS adopted regulations that
authorize, but do not require, the OTS to order an institution that has been given notice that it
is not satisfying these safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If, after
being notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable plan of compliance or fails in any
material respect to implement an accepted plan, the OTS must issue an order directing action to
correct the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which an
undercapitalized association is subject under the prompt corrective action provisions of federal
law. If an institution fails to comply with such an order, the OTS may seek to enforce such order
in judicial proceedings and to impose civil money penalties.
Real Estate Lending Standards. The OTS and the other federal banking agencies adopted regulations
to prescribe standards for extensions of credit that (i) are secured by real estate or (ii) are
made for the purpose of financing the construction of improvements on real estate. The OTS
regulations require each savings association to establish and maintain written internal real estate
lending standards that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices and appropriate to the
size of the association and the nature and scope of its real estate lending activities. The
standards also must be consistent with accompanying OTS guidelines, which include loan-to-value
ratios for the different types of real estate loans. Associations are also permitted to make a
limited amount of loans that do not conform to the proposed loan-to-value limitations so long as
such exceptions are reviewed and justified appropriately. The guidelines also list a number of
lending situations in which exceptions to the loan-to-value standards are justified.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Under the OTS prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is
required to take certain, and is authorized to take other, supervisory actions against
undercapitalized savings associations. For this purpose, a savings association would be placed in
one of the following four categories based on the associations capital: (i) well-capitalized; (ii)
adequately capitalized; (iii) undercapitalized; or (iv) critically undercapitalized.
At December 31, 2006, CFBank met the criteria for being considered well-capitalized. When
appropriate, the OTS can require corrective action by a savings association holding company under
the prompt corrective action provision of federal law.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The FDIC has adopted a risk-based insurance assessment system. The
FDIC assigns an institution to one of three capital categories based on the institutions financial
information, as of the reporting period ending seven months before the assessment period,
consisting of (i) well capitalized, (ii) adequately capitalized or (iii) undercapitalized, and one
of three supervisory subcategories within each capital group. The supervisory subgroup to which an
institution is assigned is based on a supervisory evaluation provided to the FDIC by the
institutions primary federal regulator and information that the FDIC determines to be relevant to
the institutions financial condition and the risk posed to the deposit insurance funds. An
institutions assessment rate depends on the capital category and supervisory category to which it
is assigned. Assessment rates for DIF member institutions currently range from 0 basis points to 27
basis points. The FDIC is authorized to raise the assessment rates in certain circumstances. The
FDIC has exercised this authority several times in the past and may raise insurance premiums in the
future. If the FDIC takes such action, it could have an adverse effect on the earnings of CFBank
and the Company.
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to pay on bonds
issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation (FICO) to recapitalize the predecessor to the
SAIF (now a predecessor to the DIF).
A significant increase in DIF insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the
operating expenses and results of operations of CFBank. Under the FDI Act, insurance of deposits
may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound
practices, is
24
in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law,
regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or the OTS. The management of the Company
does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit
insurance.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. CFBank is a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, which is one of the
regional FHLBs composing the FHLB System. Each FHLB provides a central credit facility primarily
for its member institutions: (i) the greater of $1,000 or 0.20% of the members mortgage-related
assets; and (ii) 4.50% of the dollar amount of any outstanding advances under such members
advances, collateral pledge and security agreement with the FHLB. CFBank, as a member of the FHLB
of Cincinnati is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB of Cincinnati in
an amount at least equal to 0.12% of the total assets of CFBank. CFBank is also required to own
activity based stock, which is based on 4.45% of CFBanks outstanding advances. These percentages
are subject to change by the FHLB. CFBank was in compliance with this requirement with an
investment in FHLB of Cincinnati stock at December 31, 2006 of $2.8 million. Any advances from a
FHLB must be secured by specified types of collateral, and all long-term advances may be obtained
only for the purpose of providing funds for residential housing finance.
The FHLBs are required to provide funds for the resolution of insolvent thrifts and to contribute
funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements could reduce the amount of earnings that
the FHLBs can pay as dividends to their members and could also result in the FHLBs imposing a
higher rate of interest on advances to their members. If dividends were reduced, or interest on
future FHLB advances increased, CFBanks net interest income would be affected. Under the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLB Act), membership in the FHLB is now voluntary for all
federally-chartered savings associations, such as CFBank. The GLB Act also replaces the existing
redeemable stock structure of the FHLB System with a capital structure that requires each FHLB to
meet a leverage limit and a risk-based permanent capital requirement. Two classes of stock are
authorized: Class A (redeemable on six-month notice) and Class B (redeemable on five-year notice).
Federal Reserve System. CFBank is subject to provisions of the FRA and the FRBs regulations
pursuant to which depositary institutions may be required to maintain non-interest-earning reserves
against their deposit accounts and certain other liabilities. Currently, reserves must be
maintained against transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking accounts). The FRB
regulations generally require that reserves be maintained in the amount of 3.0% of the aggregate of
transaction accounts up to $45.8 million. The amount of aggregate transaction accounts in excess of
$45.8 million are currently subject to a reserve ratio of $1.119 million plus 10.0%. The FRB
regulations currently exempt $8.5 million of otherwise reservable balances from the reserve
requirements, which exemption is adjusted by the FRB at the end of each year. CFBank is in
compliance with the foregoing reserve requirements. Because required reserves must be maintained in
the form of vault cash, a non interest-bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, or a pass-through
account as defined by the FRB, the effect of this reserve requirement is to reduce CFBanks
interest-earning assets. The balances maintained to meet the reserve requirements imposed by the
FRB may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements imposed by the OTS. FHLB System members are also
authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve discount window, but FRB regulations require such
institutions to exhaust all FHLB sources before borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank.
Privacy Regulations. The OTS has published final regulations implementing the privacy protection
provisions of the GLB Act. The new regulations generally require that CFBank disclose its privacy
policy, including identifying with whom it shares a customers non-public personal information,
to any customer at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter. In
addition, CFBank is required to provide its customers with the ability to opt-out of having their
personal information shared with unaffiliated third parties and not to disclose account numbers or
access codes to non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes. CFBank currently has a
privacy protection policy in
25
place and believes that such policy is in compliance with the regulations.
The USA PATRIOT Act. The USA Patriot Act of 2001 was enacted on October 26, 2001 and was renewed in
substantially the same form on March 9, 2006. This act contains the International Money Laundering
Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 (the IMLAFA). The IMLAFA contains anti-money
laundering measures affecting insured depository institutions, broker-dealers and certain other
financial institutions. The IMLAFA requires U.S. financial institutions to adopt new policies and
procedures to combat money laundering and grants the Secretary of the Treasury broad authority to
establish regulations and to impose requirements and restrictions on financial institutions
operations.
Holding Company Regulation
The Company is a savings and loan holding company regulated by the OTS and, as such, is registered
with and subject to OTS examination and supervision, as well as certain reporting requirements. In
addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over the holding company and any of our non-savings
institution subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the OTS to restrict or
prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or
stability of a subsidiary savings institution. Unlike bank holding companies, federal savings and
loan holding companies are not subject to any regulatory capital requirements or to supervision by
the Federal Reserve System.
Permissible Activities of Central Federal Corporation. Because we acquired CFBank prior to May 4,
1999, we are permitted to engage in the following non-financial activities under the GLB Act: (i)
furnishing or performing management services for a savings institution subsidiary; (ii) conducting
an insurance agency or escrow business; (iii) holding, managing or liquidating assets owned or
acquired from a savings institution subsidiary; (iv) holding or managing properties used or
occupied by a savings institution subsidiary; (v) acting as trustee under a deed of trust; (vi) any
other activity (a) that the FRB, by regulation, has determined to be permissible for bank holding
companies under Section 4(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the BHC Act), unless the
Director of the OTS, by regulation, prohibits or limits any such activity for savings and loan
holding companies, or (b) in which multiple savings and loan holding companies were authorized by
regulation to directly engage in on March 5, 1987; (vii) purchasing, holding, or disposing of stock
acquired in connection with a qualified stock issuance if the purchase of such stock by such
holding company is approved by the Director of the OTS; and (viii) any activity permissible for
financial holding companies under section 4(k) of the BHC Act.
Permissible activities which are deemed to be financial in nature or incidental thereto under
section 4(k) of the BHC Act include: (i) lending, exchanging, transferring, investing for others or
safeguarding money or securities; (ii) insurance activities or providing and issuing annuities, and
acting as principal, agent or broker; (iii) financial, investment or economic advisory services;
(iv) issuing or selling instruments representing interests in pools of assets that a bank is
permitted to hold directly; (v) underwriting, dealing in or making a market in securities; (vi)
activities previously determined by the FRB to be closely related to banking; (vii) activities that
bank holding companies are permitted to engage in outside of the United States; and (viii)
portfolio investments made by an insurance company.
Restrictions Applicable to All Savings and Loan Holding Companies. Federal law prohibits a savings
and loan holding company, including us, directly or indirectly, from acquiring: (i) control (as
defined under HOLA) of another savings institution (or a holding company parent) without prior OTS
approval; (ii) through merger, consolidation or purchase of assets, another savings institution or
a holding company thereof, or acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of such institution
(or a holding company) without prior OTS approval; or (iii) control of any depository institution
not insured by the FDIC (except through a merger with and into the holding companys savings
institution subsidiary that is approved by
26
the OTS).
A savings and loan holding company may not acquire as a separate subsidiary an insured institution
that has a principal office outside of the state where the principal office of its subsidiary
institution is located, except (i) in the case of certain emergency acquisitions approved by the
FDIC, (ii) if such holding company controls a savings institution subsidiary that operated a home
or branch office in such additional state as of March 5, 1987 or (iii) if the laws of the state in
which the savings institution to be acquired is located specifically authorize a savings
institution chartered by that state to be acquired by a savings institution chartered by the state
where the acquiring savings institution or savings and loan holding company is located or by a
holding company that controls such a state-chartered association.
If the savings institution subsidiary of a federal mutual holding company fails to meet the QTL
test set forth in Section 10(m) of the HOLA and regulations of the OTS, the holding company must
register with the FRB as a bank holding company under the BHC Act within one year of the savings
institutions failure to so qualify.
Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. Federal savings banks are subject to the prohibitions of
12 U.S.C. §1972 on certain tying arrangements. A depository institution is prohibited, subject to
some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the
consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain
some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a
competitor of the institution.
Federal Securities Laws. Our common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(g) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and, accordingly, we are
subject to information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions, and other
requirements under the Exchange Act.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a public company, we are subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which implements
a broad range of corporate governance and accounting measures for public companies designed to
promote honesty and transparency in corporate America and better protect investors from corporate
wrongdoing. The Sarbanes-Oxley Acts principal legislation and the derivative regulation and rule
making promulgated by the SEC includes: (i) the creation of an independent accounting oversight
board; (ii) auditor independence provisions that restrict non-audit services that accountants may
provide to their audit clients; (iii) additional corporate governance and responsibility measures,
including the requirement that the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
certify financial statements; (iv) a requirement that companies establish and maintain a system of
internal control over financial reporting and that a companys management provide an annual report
regarding its assessment of the effectiveness of such internal control over financial reporting to
its independent accountants and that such accountants provide an attestation report with respect to
managements assessment of the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial
reporting; (v) the forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the
sale of the companys securities by directors and senior officers in the twelve month period
following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement; (vi) an
increase in the oversight of, and enhancement of certain requirements relating to audit committees
of public companies and how they interact with independent auditors; (vii) the requirement that
audit committee members must be independent and are absolutely barred from accepting consulting,
advisory or other compensatory fees from the issuer; (viii) the requirement that companies disclose
whether at least one member of the audit committee is a financial expert (as such term is defined
by the SEC) and if not, why not; (ix) expanded disclosure requirements for corporate insiders,
including accelerated reporting of stock transactions by insiders and a prohibition on insider
trading during pension blackout periods; (x) a prohibition on personal loans to directors and
officers, except certain loans made by insured financial institutions; (xi) disclosure of a code of
ethics and the requirement of filing of a Form 8-K for a change or waiver of such code; (xii)
mandatory disclosure by analysts of potential conflicts of
27
interest; and (xiii) a range of enhanced penalties for fraud and other violations.
Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder may have a
material impact on our results of operations and financial condition, as the internal control rules
become applicable to the Company as a non-accelerated filer for the year ending December 31,
2007. The SEC has been delegated the task of enacting rules to implement various provisions with
respect to, among other matters, disclosure in periodic filings pursuant to the Exchange Act. To
date, the SEC has implemented some of the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. However, the SEC
continues to issue final rules, reports, and press releases. As the SEC provides new requirements,
we will continue to review those rules and comply as required.
Quotation on Nasdaq®. Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq® Capital Market. In order to
maintain such quotation, we are subject to certain corporate governance requirements, including:
(i) a majority of our Board of Directors must be composed of independent directors; (ii) we are
required to have an audit committee composed of at least three directors, each of whom is an
independent director, as such term is defined by both the rules of the National Association of
Securities Dealers (NASD) and by Exchange Act regulations; (iii) our nominating committee and
compensation committee must also be composed entirely of independent directors; and (iv) each of
our audit committee and nominating committee must have a publicly available written charter.
Federal and State Taxation
Federal Taxation
General. We report income on a calendar year, consolidated basis using the accrual method of
accounting, and we are subject to federal income taxation in the same manner as other corporations,
with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as
a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the
Company and CFBank. We are subject to a maximum federal income tax rate of 34% for 2006. The
Company currently has net operating losses totaling $2.2 million, $2.7 million and $431,000 that
expire in 2023, 2024 and 2025, respectively, and originated in tax years 2003, 2004 and 2005.
Distributions. Under the 1996 Act, if CFBank makes non-dividend distributions to the holding
company, such distributions will be considered to have been made from CFBanks unrecaptured tax bad
debt reserves (including the balance of its reserves as of December 31, 1987) to the extent
thereof, and then from CFBanks supplemental reserve for losses on loans, to the extent thereof,
and an amount based on the amount distributed (but not in excess of the amount of such reserves)
will be included in CFBanks taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in
excess of CFBanks current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income
tax purposes, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete
liquidation. Dividends paid out of CFBanks current or accumulated earnings and profits will not
be so included in CFBanks taxable income.
The amount of additional taxable income triggered by a non-dividend distribution is an amount that,
when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution.
Thus, if CFBank makes a non-dividend distribution to the holding company, approximately one and
one-half times the amount of such distribution (but not in excess of the amount of such reserves)
would be includable in income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% federal corporate
income tax rate. CFBank does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a recapture of any
portion of its bad debt reserves.
Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes a tax on
alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI) at a rate of 20%. Only 90% of AMTI can be offset by AMT
net operating loss carryovers The company currently has AMT net operating losses totaling $2.1
million,
28
$2.6 million and $324,000 that originated in tax years 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. AMTI is
increased by an amount equal to 75% of the amount by which the Companys adjusted current earnings
exceeds its AMTI (determined without regard to this preference and prior to reduction for net
operating losses).
Ohio Taxation
We are subject to the Ohio corporate franchise tax, which, as applied to the holding company and
Ghent Road, Inc., is a tax measured by both net earnings and net worth. In general, the tax
liability is the greater of 5.1% on the first $50,000 of computed Ohio taxable income and 8.5% of
computed Ohio taxable income in excess of $50,000 or 0.4% times taxable net worth. Under these
alternative measures of computing tax liability, complex formulas determine the jurisdictions to
which total net income and total net worth are apportioned or allocated. The minimum tax is either
$50 or $1,000 per year based on the size of the corporation, and maximum tax liability as measured
by net worth is limited to $150,000 per year.
A special litter tax also applies to all corporations, including the holding company, subject to
the Ohio corporate franchise tax. This litter tax does not apply to financial institutions. If
the franchise tax is paid on the net income basis, the litter tax is equal to 0.11% of the first
$50,000 of computed Ohio taxable income and 0.22% of computed Ohio taxable income in excess of
$50,000. If the franchise tax is paid on the net worth basis, the litter tax is equal to 0.014%
times taxable net worth.
Certain holding companies, such as Central Federal Corporation, will qualify for complete exemption
from the net worth tax if certain conditions are met. The holding company will most likely meet
these conditions, and thus, calculate its Ohio franchise tax on the net income basis.
CFBank is a financial institution for State of Ohio tax purposes. As such, it is subject to the
Ohio corporate franchise tax on financial institutions, which is imposed annually at a rate of
1.3% of CFBanks apportioned book net worth, determined in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, less any statutory deductions. As a financial institution, CFBank is not
subject to any tax based upon net income or net profits imposed by the State of Ohio.
As a result of recent legislation, the franchise tax for corporations other than financial
institutions and their related affiliates will be phased out 20% per year over five years beginning
with tax due for calendar 2006. The franchise tax for financial institutions and their related
affiliates remains unchanged by the recent legislation. Neither the Company nor any of its
affiliated companies currently is subject to the Ohio Commercial Activity Tax.
Delaware Taxation
As a Delaware holding company not earning income in Delaware, we are exempted from Delaware
corporate income tax but are required to file an annual report with and pay an annual franchise tax
to the State of Delaware.
Available Information
Our website address is www.CFBankonline.com. We make available free of charge through our website
our annual report on Form 10-KSB, quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB, current reports on Form 8-K and
any amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
reports with the Commission. These reports can be found on our website under the caption CF News
and Links Investor Relations SEC Filings. Investors also can obtain copies of our filings
from the Commissions website at www.sec.gov.
29
Item 2 Description of Property
We conduct our business through five offices located in Summit, Columbiana, and Franklin Counties,
Ohio. The net book value of the Companys properties and leasehold improvements totaled $2.9
million at December 31, 2006 and included $1.3 million in land acquisition and construction costs
of a new CFBank office in Worthington, Ohio (also located in Franklin County) which will replace
CFBanks current office in Columbus, Ohio. The new high traffic, high visibility location will
provide us with access to a market which has approximately $1 billion in retail deposits and a
larger group of commercial and retail customers. Relocation is expected to occur in the second
quarter of 2007. Additionally, Ghent Road, Inc. owns land located adjacent to the Fairlawn office
held for future development that totaled $170,000 at year-end 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
|
|
Leased or |
|
Year Leased |
|
Date of Lease |
Location |
|
Owned |
|
or Acquired |
|
Expiration |
Administrative/Home Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2923 Smith Rd |
|
Leased |
|
2004 |
|
2014 |
Fairlawn, Ohio 44333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
601 Main Street |
|
Owned |
|
1989 |
|
|
Wellsville, Ohio 43968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49028 Foulks Drive |
|
Owned |
|
1979 |
|
|
East Liverpool, Ohio 43920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4249 Easton Way, Suite 125 |
|
Leased |
|
2003 |
|
2007 |
Columbus, Ohio 43219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage Origination Office: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1730 Akron-Peninsula Rd |
|
Leased |
|
2004 |
|
2009 |
Akron, Ohio 44313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3 Legal Proceedings
We may, from time to time, be involved in various legal proceedings in the normal course of
business. Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits involving CFBank, such as
claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which CFBank holds security
interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues
incident to our business.
In December 2005, CFBank terminated the employment of Richard J. ODonnell, then serving as
President of Reserve. The former President filed a request for arbitration against CFBank,
contending that CFBank owes him $600,000 for breaching an employment agreement between him and
CFBank by discharging him without just cause. CFBank responded by denying that it breached the
employment agreement, in that CFBank had just cause to discharge him for flagrant misconduct and
malfeasance, alleging causes of action for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach
of duty of loyalty. The arbitration is in the discovery stage and the outcome cannot be determined
at this time. An
30
arbitration hearing is scheduled for March 2007. Mr. ODonnell owned 5.5% of the Companys
outstanding shares at the time the dispute arose. In January 2006, the Company issued 2.3 million
shares of its common stock in a public stock offering and, as a result of the increase in the
number of outstanding shares, Mr. ODonnells ownership was reduced to 2.7%.
In June 2005, CFBank executed an agreement with Kaleidico LLC for creation of a residential
mortgage lead generation interface system. CFBank maintains that it owns the intellectual property
developed under the contract. CFBank, further maintaining that the system developed under the
contract by Kaleidico is functionally inadequate, seeks the return of the intellectual property.
Kaleidico resists CFBanks ownership claim. The contract between CFBank and Kaleidico calls for
dispute resolution through arbitration, although CFBank is first attempting to schedule informal
resolution through meetings with Kaleidico. An outcome cannot be determined at this time.
We are not a party to any other pending legal proceeding that management believes would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations, if decided adversely to us.
No tax shelter penalty was assessed against the Company or any of our subsidiaries by the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) in calendar year 2006 or at any other time, in connection with any
transaction deemed by the IRS to be abusive or to have a significant tax avoidance purpose.
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5 |
|
Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
During the period covered by this report, the Company did not sell any securities that were not
registered under the Securities Act, and, during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, the
Company did not repurchase any of its securities.
The market information required by Item 201(a), the stockholders information required by Item
201(b) and the dividend information required by Item 201(c) of Regulation S-B is incorporated by
reference to our 2006 Annual Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to
the Commission under Rule 14a-3(b) of the Exchange Act; the information appears under the caption
Market Prices and Dividends Declared on page 17 and in Note 16 Capital Requirements and
Restrictions on Retained Earnings at page 43 therein, respectively.
The equity compensation plan information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-B is set forth
herein under Part III, Item 11, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 6 Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
Information required by Item 303 of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our 2006 Annual
Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to the Commission under Rule
14a-3(b) of the Exchange Act; the information appears under the caption Managements Discussion
and Analysis
31
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations at page 4 therein.
Item 7 Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements required by Item 310(a) of Regulation S-B are incorporated by
reference to our 2006 Annual Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to
the Commission under Rules 14a-3(b) and (c) of the Exchange Act; the financial statements appear
under the caption Financial Statements at page 18 therein and include the following:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
Item 8 |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None
Item 8A Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of disclosure
controls and procedures in Rule 13a-14(c). Management, with the participation of our principal
executive and financial officers, has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as
of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording,
processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by
us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. We made no significant changes in our
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to
the date of the completion of the evaluation of those controls by our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer.
Item 8B Other Information
None
32
PART III
|
|
|
Item 9 |
|
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act |
Directors. Information required by Item 401 of Regulation S-B with respect to our directors and
committees of the Board of Directors is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement
for our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 29, 2007, under the
caption PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age at |
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Name |
|
2006 |
|
Position held with the Company and/or Subsidiaries |
Mark S. Allio
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Company; Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond E. Heh
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer, CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Parker MacDonell
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Regional President Columbus, CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloise L. Mackus
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary, Company and CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. OBrien
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Senior Vice President Mortgage Operations,
CFBank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Therese Ann Liutkus
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
Company and CFBank |
Mark S. Allio, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Federal and Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of CFBank, joined us in February 2005 and has more than 30 years of banking
and banking-related experience, including service as President and Chief Executive Officer of Rock
Bank in Livonia, Michigan, an affiliate of Quicken Loans, Inc. from April 2003 to December 2004.
He was previously President of Third Federal Savings, MHC in Cleveland, Ohio, a multi-billion
dollar thrift holding company from January 2000 to December 2002 and Chief Financial Officer of
Third Federal from 1988 through 1999.
Raymond E. Heh, President and Chief Operating Officer, joined CFBank in June 2003. Formerly, Mr.
Heh held numerous positions at Bank One Akron NA including Chairman, President and CEO. He was
with Bank One Akron NA for 18 years and has over 40 years of experience in the commercial banking
industry. Mr. Heh is a graduate of The Pennsylvania State University.
R. Parker MacDonell, Regional President Columbus, joined CFBank in May 2003. Mr. MacDonell is a
third generation Ohio banker with 19 years of commercial banking experience. He is a former Senior
Vice President of Bank One Columbus NA, a position he held for three years during his 15 year
tenure with Bank One. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College and received his masters degree from
Yale
33
University.
Eloise L. Mackus is Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company and CFBank.
Prior to joining us in July 2003, Ms. Mackus practiced in law firms in Connecticut and Ohio and
was the Vice President and General Manager of International Markets for The J. M. Smucker Company.
Ms. Mackus completed a bachelors degree at Calvin College and a juris doctorate at The University
of Akron School of Law.
Timothy M. OBrien was Senior Vice President Mortgage Operations of CF Bank at year-end 2006 and
left CFBank to pursue other interests in February 2007. Prior to joining us in August 2005, Mr.
OBrien was Director of Asset & Risk Management at DeepGreen Financial and Senior Vice President at
Greystone Funding Corporation. Mr. OBrien has 13 years of banking experience concentrating in
commercial, residential and consumer product lines. He received a bachelors degree in Business
Administration from the University of Toledo in 1988.
Therese Ann Liutkus joined the Company and CFBank as Chief Financial Officer in November 2003.
Prior to that time, Ms. Liutkus was Chief Financial Officer of First Place Financial Corp. and
First Place Bank for six years and she has more than 20 years of banking experience. Ms. Liutkus
is a certified public accountant and has a bachelors degree in accounting from Cleveland State
University.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Information required by Item 405 of Regulation
S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 29, 2007, under the caption ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
ABOUT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS -Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
Copies of Section 16 reports, Forms 3, 4 and 5, are available on our website, www.CFBankonline.com
under the caption CF News and Links Investor Relations Section 16 Filings.
Code of Ethics. We have adopted a code of ethics, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which
meets the requirements of Item 406 of Regulation S-B and applies to all employees, including our
principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Since
our inception in 1998, we have had a code of ethics. We require all directors, officers and other
employees to adhere to the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct in addressing the legal and ethical
issues encountered in conducting their work. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct requires that
our employees avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements,
conduct business in an honest and ethical manner and otherwise act with integrity and in the
Companys best interest. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our
website, www.CFBankonline.com under the caption CF News and Links Investor Relations Corporate
Governance.
Corporate Governance. Information required by Items 407(c)(3), (d)(4) and (d)(5) of Regulation S-B
is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 29, 2007, under the caption PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS.
Item 10 Executive Compensation
Information required by Item 402 of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive
Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 29,
2007, under the caption EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
34
|
|
Item 11 |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. Information required by Item 403
of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 29, 2007, under the caption
STOCK OWNERSHIP.
Related Stockholder Matters Equity Compensation Plan Information. Information required by Item
201(d) of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our
2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on March 29, 2007, under the caption
PROPOSAL 2: THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION 2003 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN -
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION.
See Part II, Item 7, Financial Statements, Notes 1 and 15, for a description of the principal
provisions of our equity compensation plans. The information required by Item 7 is incorporated by
reference to our 2006 Annual Report to shareholders distributed to shareholders and furnished to
the Commission under Rules 14a-3(b) and (c) of the Exchange Act; the financial statements appear
under the caption Financial Statements at page 18 therein.
Item 12 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information required by Items 404 and 407(a) of Regulation S-B is incorporated by reference to our
definitive Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Commission on
March 29, 2007, under the caption ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
Item 13 Exhibits
See Exhibit Index at page 37 of this report on Form 10-KSB.
Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information required by Item 9(e) of Schedule 14A pursuant to this Item 14 is incorporated by
reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with
the Commission on March 29, 2007, under the caption PROPOSAL 3: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.
35
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark S. Allio
Mark S. Allio
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 29, 2007 |
|
|
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark S. Allio
Mark S. Allio
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Therese Ann Liutkus
Therese Ann Liutkus, CPA
|
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
(principal accounting |
|
|
|
|
and financial officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David C. Vernon
David C. Vernon
|
|
Vice-Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey W. Aldrich
Jeffrey W. Aldrich
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas P. Ash
Thomas P. Ash
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William R. Downing
William R. Downing
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gerry W. Grace
Gerry W. Grace
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jerry F. Whitmer
Jerry F. Whitmer
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the registrants Registration Statement on Form SB-2 No. 333-64089 filed with the Commission
on September 23, 1998) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form S-2 No. 333-129315 filed with
the Commission on October 28, 2005) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to
the registrants Registration Statement on Form S-2 No. 333-129315 filed with the Commission
on October 28, 2005) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Stock Certificate of Central Federal Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.0 to the registrants Registration Statement on Form SB-2 No. 333-64089 filed with
the Commission on September 23, 1998) |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Salary Continuation Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Employment Agreement between CFBank and Richard J. ODonnell (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004,
filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Employment Agreement between the registrant and David C. Vernon (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
filed with the Commission on March 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Employment Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
filed with the Commission on March 30, 2004) |
|
|
|
10.5*
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the registrant and David C. Vernon (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between the registrant and David C. Vernon
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.8*
|
|
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the registrants Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2005) |
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement between Central Federal Corporation and David C.
Vernon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrants Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on January 8, 2007) |
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
Third Amendment to Employment Agreement between CFBank and David C. Vernon (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrants Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 8,
2007) |
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings |
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Annual Report to Security Holders for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement identified pursuant to Item 13
of Form 10-KSB |
37