Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-Q

Commission File No. 1-15371

---

iSTAR FINANCIAL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 930-9400

---

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o    No ý

        As of July 31, 2008 there were 133,768,348 shares of common stock, $0.001/par value per share of iStar Financial Inc., ("Common Stock") outstanding.

---

iStar Financial Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q

---

Table of Contents

PART 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item I.    Financial Statements

iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

2

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

HPU holders are Company employees who purchased high performance common stock units under the Company's High Performance Unit Program (see Note 12).

(2)

See Note 13—Earnings Per Share for additional information.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
(In thousands)
(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

5

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1—Business and Organization

         Business—iStar Financial Inc. (the "Company") is a leading publicly-traded finance company focused on the commercial real estate industry. The Company primarily provides custom-tailored financing to high-end private and corporate owners of real estate, including senior and mezzanine real estate debt, senior and mezzanine corporate capital, corporate net lease financing and equity. The Company, which is taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT"), seeks to deliver strong dividends and superior risk-adjusted returns on equity to shareholders by providing innovative and value-added financing solutions to its customers. The Company's two primary lines of business are lending and corporate tenant leasing.

        The lending business is primarily comprised of senior and mezzanine real estate loans that typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million and have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years. These loans may be either fixed rate (based on the U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread) or variable rate (based on LIBOR plus a spread) and are structured to meet the specific financing needs of the borrowers. The Company also provides senior and subordinated capital to corporations, particularly those engaged in real estate or real estate related businesses. These financings may be either secured or unsecured, typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million and have maturities generally ranging from three to ten years. As part of the lending business, the Company also acquires whole loans, loan participations and debt securities which present attractive risk-reward opportunities.

        The Company's corporate tenant leasing business provides capital to corporations and other owners who control facilities leased to single creditworthy customers. The Company's net leased assets are generally mission critical headquarters or distribution facilities that are subject to long-term leases with public companies, many of which are rated corporate credits, and many of which provide for most expenses at the facility to be paid by the corporate customer on a triple net lease basis. Corporate tenant lease, or CTL, transactions have initial terms generally ranging from 15 to 20 years and typically range in size from $20 million to $150 million.

        The Company's primary sources of revenues are interest income, which is the interest that borrowers pay on loans, and operating lease income, which is the rent that corporate customers pay to lease our CTL properties. A smaller and more variable source of revenue is other income, which consists primarily of prepayment penalties and realized gains that occur when borrowers repay their loans before the maturity date. The Company primarily generates income through the "spread" or "margin," which is the difference between the revenues generated from loans and leases and interest expense and the cost of CTL operations. The Company generally seeks to match-fund our revenue generating assets with either fixed or floating rate debt of a similar maturity so that changes in interest rates or the shape of the yield curve will have a minimal impact on earnings.

         Organization—The Company began its business in 1993 through private investment funds. In 1998, the Company converted its organizational form to a Maryland corporation and the Company replaced its former dual class common share structure with a single class of common stock. The Company's common stock ("Common Stock") began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 4, 1999. Prior to this date, the Company's Common Stock was traded on the American Stock Exchange. Since that time, the Company has grown through the origination of new lending and leasing transactions, as well as through corporate acquisitions, including the acquisition of TriNet Corporate Realty Trust, Inc. in 1999, the acquisition of Falcon Financial Investment Trust, the acquisition of a significant non-controlling interest in Oak Hill Advisors, L.P. and affiliates in 2005, and the acquisition of the commercial real estate lending

6

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 1—Business and Organization (Continued)

business of Fremont Investment and Loan ("Fremont CRE"), a division of Fremont General Corporation, in 2007.

Note 2—Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X for interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP") for complete financial statements. These unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

        The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company, its qualified REIT subsidiaries, its majority-owned and controlled partnerships and other entities that are consolidated under the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46R, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," an interpretation of ARB 51 ("FIN 46R") (see Note 3). Certain investments in joint ventures or other entities which the Company does not control are accounted for under the equity method or the cost method (see Note 3 and Note 6 for further detail). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

        In the opinion of management, the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the Company's consolidated financial position at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the results of its operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, its changes in shareholders' equity for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and its cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. Such operating results may not be indicative of the expected results for any other interim periods or the entire year.

        The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes to conform to the 2008 presentation.

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

         Loans and other lending investments, net—As described in Note 4, "Loans and Other Lending Investments" includes the following investments: senior mortgages, subordinate mortgages, corporate/partnership loans and other lending investments-securities. Management considers nearly all of its loans and other lending investments to be held-for-investment or held-to-maturity, although a small number of investments may be classified as held-for-sale or available-for-sale. Items classified as held-for-investment or held-to-maturity are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized acquisition premiums or discounts and unamortized deferred loan costs or fees. These items also include accrued and paid-in-kind interest and accrued exit fees that the Company determines are probable of being collected. Items classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and

7

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

losses included in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are not included on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

         Corporate tenant lease assets and depreciation—CTL assets are generally recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Certain improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend the useful life, increase capacity or improve the efficiency of the asset. Repairs and maintenance items are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method of cost recovery over the shorter of estimated useful lives or 40 years for facilities, five years for furniture and equipment, the shorter of the remaining lease term or expected life for tenant improvements and the remaining useful life of the facility for facility improvements.

        CTL assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or estimated fair value less costs to sell and are included in "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company also periodically reviews long-lived assets to be held and used for an impairment in value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.

        Regarding the Company's acquisition of facilities, purchase costs are allocated to the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated fair values. The value of the tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings, building improvements and tenant improvements, is determined as if these assets are vacant, that is, at replacement cost. Intangible assets may include above-market or below-market value of leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of customer relationships and are recorded at their relative fair values.

        The capitalized above-market (or below-market) lease value is amortized as a reduction of (or, increase to) operating lease income over the remaining non-cancelable term of each lease plus any renewal periods with fixed rental terms that are considered to be below-market. The Company generally engages in sale/leaseback transactions and typically executes leases with the occupant simultaneously with the purchase of the CTL asset at market-rate rents. Because of this, no above-market or below-market lease value is ascribed to these transactions. The value of customer relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the initial and renewal terms of the leases, but no amortization period for intangible assets will exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. In the event that a customer terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of each intangible asset, including market rate adjustments, lease origination costs, in-place lease values and customer relationship values, would be charged to expense.

         Other real estate owned—Other real estate owned ("OREO") consists of properties acquired by foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure in partial or total satisfaction of non-performing loans. OREO obtained in satisfaction of a loan is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of transfer. The excess of the carrying value of the loan over the fair value of the property less estimated costs to sell is charged-off to the reserve for loan losses. Any decline in the estimated fair value of OREO that occurs after the initial transfer from the loan portfolio and any costs of holding the property are recorded in "Other expense" in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. Significant property improvements may be capitalized to the extent that the carrying value does not exceed the estimated fair value less costs to sell. The gain or loss on final disposition of an OREO is recorded in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations, and is considered income/loss from continuing operations because it represents the final stage of the Company's loan collection process.

8

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

         Equity investments—Purchased equity interests that are not publicly traded and/or do not have a readily determinable fair value are accounted for pursuant to the equity method of accounting if our ownership position is large enough to significantly influence the operating and financial policies of an investee. This is generally presumed to exist when we own between 20% and 50% of a corporation, or when we own greater than 5% of a limited partnership or limited liability company. Our share of earnings and losses in equity method investees is included in "Earnings (loss) from equity method investments" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. If our ownership position is too small to provide such influence, the cost method is used to account for the equity interest.

        For investments accounted for using the cost or equity method of accounting, management evaluates information such as budgets, business plans, and financial statements of the investee in addition to quoted market prices, if any, in determining whether an other-than-temporary decline in value exists. Factors indicative of an other-than-temporary decline in value include, but are not limited to, recurring operating losses and credit defaults. For any of our investments in which the estimated fair value is less than its carrying value, we consider whether the impairment of that investment is other-than-temporary and record impairment charges as necessary.

         Timber and timberlands—Timber and timberlands, including logging roads, are stated at cost less accumulated depletion for timber harvested and accumulated road amortization. The Company capitalizes timber and timberland purchases and reforestation costs and other costs associated with the planting and growing of timber, such as site preparation, growing or purchases of seedlings, planting, silviculture, herbicide application and the thinning of tree stands to improve growth. The cost of timber and timberlands typically is allocated between the timber and the land acquired, based on estimated relative fair values.

        Timber carrying costs, such as real estate taxes, insect and wildlife control and timberland management fees, are expensed as incurred. Net carrying value of the timber and timberlands is used to compute the gain or loss in connection with timberland sales. Timber and timberlands are included in "Other investments" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 6 for further detail).

         Capitalized interest and project costs—The Company capitalizes pre-construction costs essential to the development of property, development costs, construction costs, real estate taxes, insurance and interest costs incurred during the construction periods for qualified build-to-suit projects for corporate tenants. The Company ceases cost capitalization when the property is held available for occupancy upon substantial completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from the completion of major construction activity.

         Cash and cash equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in banks or invested in money market accounts with original maturity terms of less than 90 days.

         Restricted cash—Restricted cash represents amounts required to be maintained in escrow under certain of the Company's debt obligations, leasing and derivative transactions.

         Variable interest entities—In accordance with FIN 46R, the Company identifies entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (a "variable interest entity" or "VIE"), and determines when and which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIE. In addition, the Company discloses information pertaining to such entities wherein the Company is the primary beneficiary or other entities wherein the Company has a significant variable interest.

9

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        During 2007, the Company closed on a €100 million commitment in Moor Park Real Estate Partners II, L.P. Incorporated ("Moor Park"). Moor Park is a third-party managed fund that was created to make investments in European real estate as a 33% investor along-side a sister fund. The Company determined that Moor Park is a VIE and that the Company is the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company consolidates this entity for financial statement purposes. As of June 30, 2008, Moor Park had $50.2 million of total assets, $2.3 million in debt and $1.4 million of minority interest. The investments held by this entity are presented in "Other investments" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008.

        During 2006, the Company made an investment in TN NRDC, LLC ("TN"). TN was created to invest in a strategic real estate related opportunity in Canada. The Company determined that TN is a VIE and that the Company is the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company consolidates TN for financial statement purposes. As of June 30, 2008, TN had $101.6 million of total assets, no debt and $4.2 million of minority interest. The cost method investment held by this entity is presented in "Other investments" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        During 2006, the Company made an investment in Madison Deutsche Andau Holdings, LP ("Madison DA"). Madison DA was created to invest in mortgage loans secured by real estate in Europe. The Company determined that Madison DA is a VIE and that the Company is the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company consolidates Madison DA for financial statement purposes. As of June 30, 2008, Madison DA had $72.8 million of total assets, no debt and $11.1 million of minority interest. The investments held by this entity are presented in "Loans and other lending investments" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

         Identified intangible assets and goodwill—Upon the acquisition of a business, the Company records intangible assets acquired at their estimated fair values separate and apart from goodwill. The Company determines whether such intangible assets have finite or indefinite lives. As of June 30, 2008, all such intangible assets acquired by the Company have finite lives. The Company amortizes finite lived intangible assets based on the period over which the assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the future cash flows of the business acquired. The Company reviews finite lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes impairment loss on finite lived intangible assets if the carrying amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable and its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value.

        The excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired (including identified intangible assets) and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test is done at a level of reporting referred to as a reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value.

        Fair values for goodwill and other finite lived intangible assets are determined using the market approach, income approach or cost approach, as appropriate.

        Due to an overall deterioration in market conditions within the commercial real estate lending environment as evidenced by increased provisions for loan losses recorded during the quarter and a decrease in expected originations, the Company determined that it was necessary to evaluate goodwill for impairment as of June 30, 2008. The Company estimated the fair value of its reporting unit using a market-

10

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

based valuation. The fair value of the assets and liabilities were then allocated to the reporting unit based on an analysis of discounted cash flows. As a result of this analysis, the Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $39.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2008 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill within the real estate lending reporting unit to zero. As of June 30, 2008, the remaining $4.2 million of goodwill relates to our corporate tenant leasing reporting unit.

        In addition, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $12.5 million to reduce the carrying value of certain intangible assets, related to the Fremont CRE acquisition, based on their revised fair values. This charge was recorded to "Impairment of other assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $75.8 million of unamortized finite lived intangible assets, of which $63.0 million related to the acquisitions of new CTL facilities. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had $98.6 million of unamortized finite live intangibles. The total amortization expense for these intangible assets was $3.8 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $7.6 million and $3.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

         Revenue recognition—The Company's revenue recognition policies are as follows:

         Loans and other lending investments:    Interest income on loans and other lending investments is recognized on an accrual basis using the interest method.

        On occasion, the Company may acquire loans at premiums or discounts based on the credit characteristics of such loans. Deferred costs or fees, discounts and premiums are typically amortized over the contractual term of the loan using the interest method. Exit fees are also deferred and recognized over the lives of the related loans as a yield adjustment, if management believes it is probable that such amounts will be received. If loans with premiums, discounts, loan origination or exit fees are prepaid, the Company immediately recognizes the unamortized portion as a decrease or increase in the prepayment gain or loss which is included in "Other income" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        The Company considers a loan to be non-performing and places loans on non-accrual status at such time as: (1) management determines the borrower is incapable of, or has ceased efforts toward, curing the cause of an impairment; (2) the loan becomes 90 days delinquent; or (3) the loan has a maturity default. While on non-accrual status, loans are either accounted for on a cash basis, in which interest income is recognized only upon actual receipt, or on a cost-recovery basis, in which all receipts reduce loan carrying value, based on the Company's judgment as to collectability of principal.

        A small number of the Company's loans provide for accrual of interest at specified rates that differ from current payment terms. Interest is recognized on such loans at the accrual rate subject to management's determination that accrued interest and outstanding principal are ultimately collectible, based on the underlying collateral and operations of the borrower.

        Prepayment penalties or yield maintenance payments from borrowers are recognized as additional income when received. Certain of the Company's loan investments provide for additional interest based on the borrower's operating cash flow or appreciation of the underlying collateral. Such amounts are considered contingent interest and are reflected as income only upon certainty of collection.

11

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

         Leasing investments:    Operating lease revenue is recognized on the straight-line method of accounting from the later of the date of the origination of the lease or the date of acquisition of the facility subject to existing leases. Accordingly, contractual lease payment increases are recognized evenly over the term of the lease. The cumulative difference between lease revenue recognized under this method and contractual lease payment terms is recorded as "Deferred operating lease income receivable" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

         Reserve for loan losses—The reserve for loan losses is a valuation allowance that reflects management's estimate of loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The reserve for loan losses includes a formula-based component and an asset-specific component. The reserve is increased through the "Provision for loan losses" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations and is decreased by charge-offs when losses are confirmed through the receipt of assets such as cash in a pre-foreclosure sale or via ownership control of the underlying collateral in full satisfaction of the loan upon foreclosure or when significant collection efforts have ceased.

        The formula-based reserve component covers performing loans and provisions for loan losses are recorded when (i) available information as of each balance sheet date indicates that it is probable a loss has occurred in the portfolio and (ii) the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies" ("SFAS 5"). Required reserve balances for the performing loan portfolio are derived from probabilities of principal loss and loss given default estimates assigned to the portfolio during the Company's quarterly internal risk rating assessment. Probabilities of principal loss and severity factors are based on industry and/or internal experience and may be adjusted for significant factors that, based on the Company's judgment, impact the collectability of the loans as of the balance sheet date.

        The asset-specific component relates to reserves for losses on loans considered impaired and measured pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairments of a Loan (an amendment of FASB Statement No. 5 and 15)," ("SFAS 114"). In accordance with SFAS 114, the Company considers a loan to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it believes that it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A reserve is established when the present value of payments expected to be received, observable market prices, or the estimated fair value of the collateral (for loans that are solely dependent on the collateral for repayment) of an impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. Each of our non-performing loans, or NPLs, are considered impaired and are evaluated individually to determine required asset-specific reserves.

         Allowance for doubtful accounts—The Company has established policies that require a reserve on the Company's accrued operating lease income receivable balances and on the deferred operating lease income receivable balances. The reserve covers asset specific problems (e.g., tenant bankruptcy) as they arise, as well as a portfolio reserve based on management's evaluation of the credit risks associated with these receivables.

         Derivative instruments and hedging activity—The Company recognizes derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability.

12

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        For fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative, along with changes in the fair value of the respective hedged item are reported in earnings in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The effective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative that is designated as a cash flow hedge is reported in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and the ineffective portion of a change in fair value of a cash flow hedge is reported in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net interest receivable or payable on the interest rate swaps is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to "Interest expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        Derivatives, such as foreign currency hedges and interest rate caps, that are not designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are considered economic hedges, with changes in fair value reported in current earnings in "Other income" or "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company does not enter into derivatives for trading purposes.

        The Company formally documents all hedging relationships at inception, including its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. The hedge instrument and the hedged item are designated at the execution of the hedge instrument or upon re-designation during the life of the hedge. Hedge effectiveness is assessed and measured under identical time periods and depending on the hedging strategy, the Company uses the hypothetical derivative method and statistical regression to assess effectiveness, and the hypothetical derivative method to measure ineffectiveness. In addition, the Company does not exclude any component of the derivative's gain or loss in the assessment of effectiveness.

         Stock-based compensation—The Company measures compensation costs for restricted stock awards as of the date of grant and expenses such amounts against earnings, either at the grant date (if no vesting period exists) or ratably over the respective vesting/service period.

        The Company follows the fair-value method of accounting for options issued to employees or directors. Accordingly, the Company recognizes a charge equal to the fair value of these options at the date of grant multiplied by the number of options issued. This charge is amortized over the related remaining vesting terms to individuals as additional compensation.

         Disposal of long-lived assets—The results of operations from CTL assets and our timber asset group that were sold or held for sale in the current and prior periods are classified as "Income from discontinued operations" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations even though such income was actually recognized by the Company prior to the asset sale. Gains from the sale of CTL assets and our timber asset group are classified as "Gain from discontinued operations, net of minority interest" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

         Depletion—Depletion relates to the Company's investment in timberland assets. Assumptions and estimates are used in the recording of depletion. An annual depletion rate for each timberland investment is established by dividing book cost of timber by estimated standing merchantable inventory. Changes in the assumptions and/or estimations used in these calculations may affect the Company's results, in particular depletion costs. Factors that can impact timber volume include weather changes, losses due to natural causes, differences in actual versus estimated growth rates and changes in the age when timber is considered merchantable.

13

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

         Income taxes—The Company is subject to federal income taxation at corporate rates on its "REIT taxable income;" however, the Company is allowed a deduction for the amount of dividends paid to its shareholders, thereby subjecting the distributed net income of the Company to taxation at the shareholder level only. In addition, the Company is allowed several other deductions in computing its "REIT taxable income," including non-cash items such as depreciation expense. These deductions allow the Company to shelter a portion of its operating cash flow from its dividend payout requirement under federal tax laws. The Company intends to operate in a manner consistent with and to elect to be treated as a REIT for tax purposes.

        The Company can participate in certain activities from which it was previously precluded in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, as long as these activities are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable subsidiaries under the Code, subject to certain limitations. As such, the Company, through its taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRSs"), is engaged in various real estate related opportunities, including but not limited to: (1) managing corporate credit-oriented investment strategies; (2) certain activities related to the purchase and sale of timber and timberlands; and (3) servicing certain loan portfolios. The Company will consider other investments through TRS entities if suitable opportunities arise. The Company's TRS entities are not consolidated for federal income tax purposes and are taxed as corporations. For financial reporting purposes, current and deferred taxes are provided for in the portion of earnings recognized by the Company with respect to its interest in TRS entities and are included in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company also recognizes interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, included in "General and administrative" on the Company's Consolidated Statements Operations. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The tax effects of our temporary differences and carryforwards are recorded as deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, included in "Deferred expenses and other assets" and "Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities", respectively, on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Such amounts are not material to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, except for the Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries, no current or deferred federal taxes are provided for in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

         Earnings per common share—In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6, ("EITF 03-6"), "Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share," the Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") for common shareholders and High Performance Unit ("HPU") holders (see Note 11). EITF 03-6 must be utilized in calculating earnings per share by a company that has issued securities other than common stock that contractually entitles the holder to participate in dividends and earnings of the company when, and if, the company declares dividends on its common stock. Vested HPU shares are entitled to dividends of the Company when dividends are declared. Basic earnings per share ("Basic EPS") for the Company's Common Stock and HPU shares are computed by dividing net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and HPU shares outstanding for the period, respectively. Diluted earnings per share ("Diluted EPS") would be computed similarly, however, it reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower earnings per share amount.

14

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        As of June 30, 2008, the conditions for conversion related to the Company's $800 million convertible senior floating rate notes due 2012 ("Convertible Notes") have not been met. If the conditions for conversion are met, the Company may choose to pay in cash and/or Common Stock; however, if this occurs, the Company has the intent and ability to settle this debt in cash. Accordingly, there was no impact on the Company's diluted earnings per share for any of the periods presented (see FSP APB 14-1 below for further discussion).

New accounting standards

        In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position ("FSP") FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method as described in SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Under the guidance in FSP EITF 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. All prior-period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions of this FSP. Early application is not permitted. The Company will adopt this interpretation on January 1, 2009, as required, and management is still evaluating the impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1 "Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)". This FSP clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants. Additionally, this FSP specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity's nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt this interpretation on January 1, 2009, as required, and management is still evaluating the impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets" ("FSP FAS 142-3"). FSP FAS 142-3 removes the requirement of SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS No. 142") for an entity to consider, when determining the useful life of an acquired intangible asset, whether the intangible asset can be renewed without substantial cost or material modifications to the existing terms and conditions associated with the intangible asset. FSP FAS 142-3 replaces the previous useful-life assessment criteria with a requirement that an entity considers its own experience in renewing similar arrangements. If the entity has no relevant experience, it would consider market participant assumptions regarding renewal. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company will adopt this interpretation on January 1, 2009,

15

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

as required, and management is still evaluating the impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133" ("SFAS No. 161"). The Statement requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures regarding derivative instruments and hedging activities. It requires companies to better convey the purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that such company is intending to manage. Disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a company's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows are required. This Statement retains the same scope as SFAS No. 133 and is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009, as required, and management is still evaluating the impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In February 2008, the FASB issued a FASB Staff Position ("FSP") on Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions "FSP FAS 140-3." This FSP addresses the issue of whether or not these transactions should be viewed as two separate transactions or as one "linked" transaction. The FSP includes a "rebuttable presumption" that presumes linkage of the two transactions unless the presumption can be overcome by meeting certain criteria. The FSP will be effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and will apply only to original transfers made after that date; early adoption will not be allowed. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this interpretation will have on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), "Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141(R)"). SFAS 141(R) expands the definition of transactions and events that qualify as business combinations; requires that the acquired assets and liabilities, including contingencies, be recorded at the fair value determined on the acquisition date and changes thereafter reflected in revenue, not goodwill; changes the recognition timing for restructuring costs; and requires acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred. Adoption of SFAS 141(R) is required for combinations after December 15, 2008. Early adoption and retroactive application of SFAS 141(R) to fiscal years preceding the effective date are not permitted. The Company will adopt SFAS 141(R) as required, and management is still evaluating the impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements" ("SFAS 160"). SFAS 160 re-characterizes minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries as non-controlling interests and requires the classification of minority interests as a component of equity. Under SFAS 160, a change in control will be measured at fair value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. The effective date for SFAS 160 is for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption and retroactive application of SFAS 160 to fiscal years preceding the effective date are not permitted. The Company will adopt SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009, as required, and management is still evaluating the impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In February 2007, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 ("SFAS No. 159"), "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115." SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value and is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, as required, but did not elect to apply the fair value

16

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 3—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

option to any of its financial assets or liabilities. As such, the adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have an impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements

        In September 2006, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 ("SFAS No. 157"), "Fair Value Measurements." This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the exchange price notion in the fair value definition to mean the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). This statement also clarifies that market participant assumptions should include assumptions about risk, should include assumptions about the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and should reflect its nonperformance risk (the risk that the obligation will not be fulfilled). Nonperformance risk should include the reporting entity's credit risk.

        In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-1, "Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13" ("FSP 157-1") and FSP 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157" ("FSP 157-2"). FSP 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its scope. FSP 157-2 provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. These nonfinancial items include assets and liabilities such as reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test and nonfinancial assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and was adopted by the Company, as it applies to its financial instruments, effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to financial instruments did not have a significant impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 15—Fair Value of Financial Instruments for additional details. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 157 as it relates to its non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities effective January 1, 2009, and management is still evaluating the impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

17

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4—Loans and Other Lending Investments

        The following is a summary description of the Company's loans and other lending investments ($ in thousands)(1):

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

Details (other than carrying values) are for loans outstanding as of June 30, 2008.

(2)

Substantially all variable-rate loans are based on either 30-day LIBOR and reprice monthly or six-month LIBOR and reprice semi-annually. The 30-day LIBOR and six-month LIBOR on June 30, 2008 was 2.46% and 3.11%, respectively. As of June 30, 2008, 10 loans with a combined carrying value of $421.9 million have a stated accrual rate that exceeds the stated pay rate.

(3)

Certain loans require fixed payments of principal resulting in partial principal amortization over the term of the loan with the remaining principal due at maturity.

(4)

As of June 30, 2008, 39 loans with a combined carrying value of $1.07 billion are on non-accrual status. As of December 31, 2007, 31 loans with a combined carrying value of $719.4 million were on non-accrual status.

(5)

As of June 30, 2008, five loans with a combined carrying value of $136.1 million have stated accrual rates of up to 25%, however, no interest is due until their scheduled maturities ranging from 2008 to 2017. One Corporate/Partnership loan, with a carrying value of $60.7 million, has a stated accrual rate of 12.4% and no interest is due until its scheduled maturity in 2046.

(6)

As of June 30, 2008, includes foreign denominated loans with combined carrying values of approximately £169.0 million, €119.2 million, CAD 53.0 million and SEK 103.6 million. Amounts in table have been converted to U.S. dollars based on exchange rates in effect at June 30, 2008.

(7)

As of June 30, 2008, securities with a combined carrying value of $133.6 million are on non-accrual status. As of December 31, 2007, no securities were on non-accrual status.

18

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4—Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the Company originated or acquired an aggregate of approximately $11.6 million and $1.65 billion in loans and other lending investments, funded $1.91 billion and $765.3 million under existing loan commitments, and received principal repayments of $2.58 billion and $1.39 billion.

        As of June 30, 2008, the Company had 215 loans with unfunded commitments totaling $3.64 billion, of which $522.6 million was discretionary and $3.12 billion was non-discretionary.

        As of June 30, 2008, $703.2 million of loans and other lending investments were pledged as collateral on two of our secured term loans (see Note 8 for further detail).

         Reserve for loan losses—Changes in the Company's reserve for loan losses were as follows (in thousands):

        As of June 30, 2008, the Company identified loans with a carrying value of $1.12 billion and a gross loan value of $1.38 billion that were impaired in accordance with SFAS 114 (see Note 3—Reserve for loan losses for further detail). The Company assessed each of the impaired loans for specific impairment and determined that loans with a gross loan value of $957.2 million required specific reserves totaling $237.2 million and that the remaining impaired loans did not require any specific reserves. The total reserve for loan losses of $460.1 million includes the $237.2 million of SFAS 114 asset specific reserves and the remainder represents SFAS 5 general reserves.

        Gross loan value represents the Company's carrying value of a loan and the participation interest sold on the Fremont CRE portfolio. It represents what the carrying value of the loan would have been if the loan participation had not occurred. Under the terms of the participation, the Fremont CRE participation will receive 70% of all loan principal payments, including principal that the Company has funded. Therefore, the Company is in the first loss position. As such, the Company believes that presentation of the total recorded investment is more relevant than a presentation of the Company's carrying value when assessing the Company's risk of loss on the loans in the Fremont CRE Portfolio.

        The average carrying value of impaired loans was approximately $1.12 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the Company recorded cash payments of $2.8 million from impaired loans in "Interest income" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Impaired loans are included on the Company's non-performing loan list and are on non-accrual status as of June 30, 2008.

        During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold loans with a total cumulative carrying value of $26.1 million and $183.9 million, respectively, for which it recorded net realized losses of $1.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively. There were no loans sold during the three or six months ended June 30, 2007. Gains and losses on sales of loans are reported in "Other income" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

19

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4—Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

         Securities—As of June 30, 2008, the carrying value of Other Lending Investment-Securities includes $384.1 million of held-to-maturity securities with an aggregate fair value of $380.1 million and gross unrealized gains of $3.5 million and unrealized losses of $7.5 million. As of June 30, 2008, the securities with unrealized losses of $7.5 million had an aggregate fair value of $213.1 million and none of these securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer. The carrying value of Other Lending Investments—Securities also includes $15.2 million of available-for-sale securities recorded at fair value.

        Included in Other Lending Investments-Securities are $232.2 million of held-to-maturity securities that mature in one to five years, $151.9 million of held-to-maturity securities that mature in five to ten years and $15.2 million of available-for-sale securities that mature in five to ten years.

        As of June 30, 2008, the Company determined that unrealized losses on certain securities were other than temporary and recorded impairment charges totaling $40.0 million in "Impairment of other assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The impairment charge was based on market prices as of June 30, 2008.

         SOP 03-3 loans—AICPA Statement of Position 03-3 ("SOP 03-3") prescribes the accounting treatment for acquired loans with evidence of credit deterioration for which it is probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments will not be received. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had SOP 03-3 loans with a cumulative principal balance of $269.5 million and $273.6 million, respectively, and a cumulative carrying value of $228.1 million and $231.8 million, respectively. The Company does not have a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected on the SOP 03-3 loans and is recognizing income using the cash basis of accounting or applying cash using the cost recovery method. The majority of the Company's SOP 03-3 loans were acquired in the acquisition of Fremont CRE.

         Other real estate owned—("OREO") on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets included real estate assets received through foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure on certain non-performing loans in the Company's loan portfolio. The Company records OREO at estimated fair value less costs to sell, as the Company intends to sell these assets. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company received titles to properties in satisfaction of senior mortgage loans with cumulative carrying values of $265.3 million, for which those properties had served as collateral and recorded charge-offs totaling $46.6 million related to these loans. The amounts charged-off represent the difference between the Company's carrying values in the loans and the respective estimated fair values of the net assets received through foreclosure or in lieu of payment less costs to sell. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold two of these properties for net proceeds of $81.3 million, and a net gain of $0.5 million, recorded in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company also sold units within the OREO properties for net proceeds of $5.0 million.

        The Company recorded $4.8 million and $7.1 million of net expense in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations related to holding costs for these properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

         Fremont CRE participation—On July 2, 2007, the Company completed the sale of a $4.20 billion participation interest in the $6.27 billion Fremont CRE portfolio. Under the terms of the participation, the Company pays 70% of all principal collected from the Fremont CRE portfolio, including principal collected from amounts funded on the loans subsequent to the acquisition of the portfolio, until the participation is fully repaid. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had unfunded loan commitments of

20

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 4—Loans and Other Lending Investments (Continued)

$1.16 billion related to the Fremont CRE portfolio. The Fremont CRE participation pays floating interest at LIBOR + 1.50%.

        Changes in the outstanding Fremont CRE participation balance were as follows (in thousands):

Explanatory Note:

---

(1)

Includes $156.5 million of principal repayments received by the Company that have not yet been remitted to the Fremont CRE participation and are reflected as a payable in "Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Note 5—Corporate Tenant Lease Assets

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company acquired an aggregate of approximately $2.0 million and $168.7 million in CTL assets, respectively, and disposed of CTL assets for net proceeds of approximately $253.3 million and $64.7 million, respectively, resulting in gains of $25.4 million and $6.8 million, respectively.

        During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company sold a portfolio of 32 CTL assets to one buyer in addition to the sale of four CTL assets to three different buyers for aggregate net proceeds of approximately $245.1 million and realized gains of approximately $23.3 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company disposed of four CTL assets for net proceeds of $29.8 million and recognized gains of approximately $5.4 million.

        The Company's investments in CTL assets, at cost, were as follows (in thousands):

        Under certain leases, the Company is entitled to receive additional participating lease payments to the extent gross revenues of the corporate customer exceed a base amount. The Company earned approximately $1.4 million and $0.1 million in additional participating lease payments on such leases during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In addition, the Company also receives reimbursements from customers for certain facility operating expenses including common area costs, insurance and real estate taxes. Customer expense reimbursements for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were approximately $9.5 million and $9.0 million, respectively, and $18.6 million and $15.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and are included as a reduction of "Operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        The Company is subject to expansion option agreements with three existing customers which could require the Company to fund and to construct up to 171,000 square feet of additional adjacent space on which the Company would receive additional operating lease income under the terms of the option agreements. Upon exercise of such expansion option agreements, the corporate customers would be

21

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 5—Corporate Tenant Lease Assets (Continued)

required to simultaneously extend their existing lease terms for additional periods ranging from six to ten years.

        Certain CTL assets are subject to mortgage liens. As of June 30, 2008, 60 CTL assets with an aggregate net book value of $1.54 billion were encumbered with mortgages. As of December 31, 2007, 27 CTL assets with an aggregate net book value of $381.4 million were encumbered with mortgages.

        As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $28.2 million of non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to four CTL investments. These commitments generally fall into two categories: (1) pre-approved capital improvement projects; and (2) new or additional construction costs. Upon completion of the improvements or construction, the Company will receive additional operating lease income from the customers. In addition, the Company had $7.1 million of non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to eight existing customers in the form of tenant improvements which were negotiated between the Company and the customers at the commencement of the leases.

        As of June 30, 2008, there were two CTL assets with an aggregate book value of $74.9 million classified as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

        The Company capitalized $2.1 million and $1.1 million of interest on build-to-suit CTL assets for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Note 6—Other Investments

        Other investments consist of the following items (in thousands):

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

Accumulated amortization on CTL intangibles was $20.0 million and $15.5 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.



(2)

Accumulated depletion on timber and timberlands was $0 and $14.1 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

         Equity method investments—As of June 30, 2008, the Company owned 47.5% interests in Oak Hill Advisors, L.P., Oak Hill Credit Alpha MGP, LLC, Oak Hill Credit Opportunities MGP, LLC, OHA Finance MGP, LLC, OHA Capital Solutions MGP, LLC and OHA Strategic Credit Fund, LLC, and 48.1% interests in OHSF GP Partners II, LLC and OHSF GP Partners (Investors), LLC, (collectively, "Oak Hill"). Oak Hill engages in investment and asset management services. The Company has determined that all of these entities are variable interest entities and that an external member is the primary beneficiary. As such, the Company accounts for these ventures under the equity method. Upon acquisition of the original interests in Oak Hill there was a difference between the Company's book value of the equity investments and the underlying equity in the net assets of Oak Hill of approximately $200.2 million. The Company allocated this value to identifiable intangible assets of approximately $81.8 million and goodwill of

22

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6—Other Investments (Continued)

$118.4 million. The unamortized balance related to intangible assets for these investments was approximately $55.4 million and $58.4 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The Company's carrying value in Oak Hill was $178.7 million and $199.6 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and the Company recognized equity in earnings from these entities of $5.8 million and $5.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $11.0 million and $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        Prior to selling our interest, the Company owned a 46.7% interest in TimberStar Southwest Holdco LLC ("TimberStar Southwest"), through its majority owned subsidiary TimberStar Operating Partnership, L.P. ("TimberStar"). TimberStar Southwest was created to acquire and manage a diversified portfolio of timberlands located in Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas. The Company accounted for this investment under the equity method due to the venture's external partners having certain participating rights giving them shared control. Upon acquisition, there was a $1.0 million difference between the Company's book value of the equity investment and the underlying equity in the net assets of the entity, which the Company allocated to identifiable intangible assets. On April 1, 2008, the Company closed on the sale of its TimberStar Southwest joint venture and the venture's approximately 900,000-acre portfolio of forestland and related assets for a gross sales price of $1.71 billion, including the assumption of debt. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $417.0 million for its interest in the venture and recorded a gain of $261.7 million, net of minority interest.

        The Company recognized equity in losses from the investment of $0.5 million and $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and $3.2 million and $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company's share of depletion, depreciation and amortization expense from the entity was $0 and $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $6.7 million and $17.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and consists primarily of depletion from the harvesting and sale of timber.

        As of June 30, 2008, the Company owned a 29.52% interest in Madison International Real Estate Fund II, LP, a 32.92% interest in Madison International Real Estate Fund III, LP, and a 29.52% interest in Madison GP1 Investors, LP (collectively, the "Madison Funds"). The Madison Funds invest in illiquid ownership positions of entities that own real estate assets. The Company's carrying value in the Madison Funds was $51.1 million and $38.0 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and the Company recognized equity in earnings from these investments of $1.1 million and equity in losses of $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and equity in losses of $1.5 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        The Company also had investments in 16 and 15 additional entities that were accounted for under the equity method as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The Company's ownership in these entities ranged from 0.83% to 50.0% as of June 30, 2008 and the Company's carrying value in these investments was $101.0 million and $99.2 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The Company recognized cumulative net equity in earnings of $1.2 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and net equity in earnings of $0.2 million and $4.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $89.6 million of non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to eight equity method investments.

23

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 6—Other Investments (Continued)

        The following table presents the summarized financial information of the Company's equity method investments (in thousands):

         Cost method investments—The Company had investments in 19 separate real estate related funds or other strategic investment opportunities within niche markets that are accounted for under the cost method and had cumulative carrying values of $241.1 million and $173.8 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $159.7 million of non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to three cost method investments. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company reclassified a loan with a net carrying value of $69.4 million from "Loans and other lending investments, net" to "Other investments" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets, as a cost method investment. As of June 30, 2008, the Company determined that unrealized losses on this investment were other-than-temporary and, as such, recorded a $5.2 million non-cash impairment charge which is reflected in "Impairment of other assets" on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company redeemed its interest in a profits participation that was originally received as part of a prior lending investment and carried as a cost method investment prior to redemption. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded a note receivable of $44.2 million and an equal amount of income in "Other income" in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

         Timber and timberlands—On June 30, 2008, the Company closed on the sale of its Maine Timber property for net proceeds of $152.9 million resulting in a gain of $23.4 million, net of minority interest, which is included in "Gain from discontinued operations" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. Net income of $0.6 million and $0.8 million is reflected in "Income from discontinued operations" for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.4 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Note 7—Other Assets and Other Liabilities

        Deferred expenses and other assets consist of the following items (in thousands):

24

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 7—Other Assets and Other Liabilities (Continued)

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

Accumulated amortization on deferred financing fees was $35.1 million and $27.6 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.



(2)

Accumulated depreciation on corporate furniture, fixture and equipment was $5.9 million and $4.8 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.



(3)

Accumulated amortization on leasing costs was $7.8 million and $8.4 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.



(4)

Accumulated amortization on intangible assets was $9.4 million and $6.0 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

        Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities consist of the following items (in thousands):

25

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8—Debt Obligations

        As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company has debt obligations under various arrangements with financial institutions as follows (in thousands):

26

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8—Debt Obligations (Continued)

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

All interest rates and maturity dates are for debt outstanding as of June 30, 2008. Some variable-rate debt obligations are based on 30-day LIBOR and reprice monthly. Foreign variable-rate debt obligations are based on 30-day UK LIBOR for British pound borrowing, 30-day EURIBOR for euro borrowing and 30-day Canadian LIBOR for Canadian dollar borrowing. The 30-day LIBOR rate on June 30, 2008 was 2.46%. The 30-day UK LIBOR, EURIBOR and Canadian LIBOR rates on June 30, 2008 were 5.50%, 4.40% and 3.16%, respectively. Other variable-rate debt obligations are based on 90-day LIBOR and reprice every three months. The 90-day LIBOR rate on June 30, 2008 was 2.78%.

(2)

This facility has an unused commitment fee of 0.25% on any undrawn amounts.

(3)

Maturity date reflects one-year extension at the Company's option.

(4)

As of June 30, 2008, the line of credit included foreign borrowings of £79.0 million, €182.0 million, and CAD 39.0 million bearing interest at weighted average rates of 6.03%, 5.01%, and 3.73%, respectively. Amounts in the table have been converted to U.S. dollars based on exchange rates in effect at June 30, 2008.

(5)

These facilities have an annual commitment fee of 0.125%.

(6)

As of June 30, 2008, the line of credit included foreign borrowings of £53.0 million and CAD 13.0 million bearing interest at weighted average rates of 6.03% and 3.64%, respectively. Amounts in the table have been converted to U.S. dollars based on exchange rates in effect at June 30, 2008.

(7)

Maturity date reflects six-month extension at the Company's option.

(8)

This short-term financing has been extended consecutively in short-term intervals with varying interest rates since August 2007. It currently matures in August 2008.

         Unsecured/Secured Credit Facilities—The Company's primary source of short-term funds is an aggregate of $3.42 billion of available credit under its two committed unsecured revolving credit facilities, which includes a $2.22 billion facility, maturing in June 2011, as well as a $1.20 billion facility, maturing in June 2012. As of June 30, 2008, there was approximately $974.5 million which was immediately available to draw under these facilities at the Company's discretion. In addition, the Company has a $500.0 million secured revolving credit facility for which availability is based on percentage borrowing base calculations. There were no amounts outstanding under this secured credit facility as of June 30, 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company amended and restated its $500.0 million secured credit facility to allow it to extend the maturity from September 2008 to September 2009.

        During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company repaid all outstanding indebtedness on the interim financing facility that was used to fund the Fremont CRE acquisition in July 2007.

         Capital Markets Activity—In May 2008, the Company issued $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes bearing interest at an annual rate of 8.625% and maturing in June 2013. The Company primarily used the proceeds from the issuance of these securities to repay outstanding indebtedness under its unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company also entered into interest rate swap agreements to swap the fixed interest rate on the $750.0 million Senior Notes for a variable interest rate (see Note 10 for further details).

        In May 2008, the Company repurchased $13.6 million of its Senior Floating Rate Notes maturing in March 2009 and $10.0 million of its Senior Floating Rate Notes maturing in September 2009 in open market transactions. In connection with these repurchases, the Company recorded an aggregate net gain on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.6 million and reflected this as a reduction of "Other expense."

27

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 8—Debt Obligations (Continued)

        In March 2008, the Company repaid $570.0 million aggregate principal amount of both fixed and floating rate Senior Notes.

         Other Financing Activity—During the second quarter of 2008, the Company closed on a $947.9 million secured term financing maturing in April 2011. This financing is collateralized by 34 properties in our Corporate Tenant Lease portfolio and bears interest at the greater of 6.25% or LIBOR + 3.40%.

        In March 2008, the Company entered into a $300 million senior secured term loan maturing in March 2009 with a six-month extension available at the Company's option. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 2.50% and are collateralized by investments included in our loans and other lending investments portfolio.

        Also in March 2008, the Company closed on a $53.3 million secured term note maturing in March 2011. This note is collateralized by four assets in our Corporate Tenant Lease portfolio and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.65%.

        As of June 30, 2008, future scheduled maturities of outstanding long-term debt obligations are as follows (in thousands)(1)(2):

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

Assumes exercise of extensions to the extent such extensions are at the Company's option.



(2)

This table excludes $28.7 million of borrowings under secured term loans as these amounts have original maturities of less than one year.

Note 9—Shareholders' Equity

         DRIP/Stock Purchase Plan—During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company issued a total of approximately 32,000 shares and 12,400 shares of its Common Stock, respectively, and during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company issued a total of approximately 57,000 and 19,800 shares of its Common Stock, respectively, through both plans. Net proceeds for each of the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $0.6 million, and $1.1 million and $0.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There are approximately 2.0 million shares available for issuance under the plan as of June 30, 2008.

         Stock Repurchase Program—During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased 235,000 shares of its outstanding Common Stock for a cost of approximately $3.7 million at an average cost

28

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 9—Shareholders' Equity (Continued)

per share of $15.57. During the six months ended June 30 2008, the Company repurchased 335,000 shares of its outstanding Common Stock for a cost of approximately $5.2 million at an average cost per share of $15.52. There were no shares repurchased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. As of June 30, 2008, there were approximately 1.4 million shares available to purchase under the Company's 5.0 million share repurchase program.

Note 10—Risk Management and Derivatives

         Risk management—In the normal course of its on-going business operations, the Company encounters economic risk. There are three main components of economic risk: interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. The Company is subject to interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice at different points in time and potentially at different bases, than its interest-earning assets. Credit risk is the risk of default on the Company's lending and CTL investments that results from a borrower's or corporate tenant's inability or unwillingness to make contractually required payments. Market risk reflects changes in the value of loans and other lending investments due to changes in interest rates or other market factors, including the rate of prepayments of principal and the value of the collateral underlying loans, the valuation of CTL facilities held by the Company and changes in foreign currency exchange rates.

         Use of derivative financial instruments—As of June 30, 2008, the Company had forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge variability in cash flows on $125.0 million of debt forecasted and probable to be issued in 2009. The Company also had interest rate swaps that hedge the change in fair value associated with $2.0 billion of existing fixed-rate debt and foreign currency derivatives to hedge the exposure to foreign exchange rate movements related to a loan originated in Swedish Krona and an equity investment in Indian Rupee. The foreign exchange derivatives were not designated as hedges under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS No. 133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," therefore, changes in fair value are recorded in "Other income" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2008, no derivatives were designated as hedges of net investments in foreign operations.

        The following table represents the notional principal amounts and fair values of interest rate swaps by class (in thousands):

        The Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements, designated as fair-value hedges, with notional amounts totaling $750.0 million and variable interest rates that reset quarterly based on three-month LIBOR. These swap agreements were entered into to exchange the 8.625% fixed-rate interest payments on the Company's $750.0 million Senior Notes due in 2013 for variable-rate interest payments based on three-month LIBOR.

29

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10—Risk Management and Derivatives (Continued)

        The following table presents the Company's foreign currency derivatives outstanding as of June 30, 2008 (in thousands):

        Pursuant to the terms of the Company's $947.9 million secured financing, the Company purchased two interest rate caps with notional amounts totaling $947.9 million and cap rates of 4.0%, which expire in May 2011. In order to offset the economic impact of the purchased caps, the Company simultaneously sold two interest rate caps with the same terms as the purchased caps. The interest rate caps were not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, therefore, the changes in the fair market value are recorded in "Other expense" on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations.

        The following table represents the notional principal amounts and fair values of interest rate caps by class (in thousands):

        At June 30, 2008, derivatives with a fair value of $29.9 million were included in other assets and derivatives with a fair value of $25.2 million were included in other liabilities.

         Credit risk concentrations—Concentrations of credit risks arise when a number of borrowers or customers related to the Company's investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. The Company regularly monitors various segments of its portfolio to assess potential concentrations of credit risks. Management believes the current portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of credit risks.

        Substantially all of the Company's CTL assets (including those held by joint ventures) and loans and other lending investments are collateralized by facilities located in the United States, with California (15.1%), Florida (11.9%) and New York (10.5%) representing the only significant concentration (greater than 10.0%) as of June 30, 2008. These assets also contain significant concentrations in the following asset types as of June 30, 2008: apartment/residential (22.9%), land (14.0%) and office-CTL (11.2%).

        The Company underwrites the credit of prospective borrowers and customers and often requires them to provide some form of credit support such as corporate guarantees, letters of credit and/or cash security deposits. Although the Company's loans and other lending investments and corporate customer lease assets are geographically diverse and the borrowers and customers operate in a variety of industries, to the

30

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 10—Risk Management and Derivatives (Continued)

extent the Company has a significant concentration of interest or operating lease revenues from any single borrower or customer, the inability of that borrower or customer to make its payment could have an adverse effect on the Company.

Note 11—Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Employee Benefits

        The Company's 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "LTIP Plan") is designed to provide equity-based incentive compensation for officers, key employees, directors, consultants and advisers of the Company. This Plan was effective May 31, 2006 and replaces the original 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The Plan provides for awards of stock options, shares of restricted stock, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights and other performance awards. There is a maximum of 4,550,000 shares of Common Stock available for awards under the Plan provided that the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for grants of options designated as incentive stock options is 1.0 million, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions in the Plan. All awards under the Plan are at the discretion of the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors. At June 30, 2008, options to purchase approximately 531,000 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and approximately 1.8 million shares of restricted stock were outstanding. Many of these options and shares of restricted stock were issued under the original 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan. A total of approximately 2.8 million shares remain available for awards under the LTIP Plan as of June 30, 2008.

        The Company's 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan ("Incentive Plan") was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors in 2007 in order to establish performance goals for selected officers and other key employees and to determine bonuses that will be awarded to those officers and other key employees based on the extent to which they achieve those performance goals. Equity-based awards made under the Incentive Plan will be limited to the number of shares of the Company's common stock available for award under the 2006 LTIP Plan.

        Changes in options outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2008, are as follows (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands, except for weighted average strike price):

31

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 11—Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Employee Benefits (Continued)

        The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable options as of June 30, 2008 (in thousands):

        The Company has not issued any options since 2003. Cash received from option exercises during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $0 and $7.2 million. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was $0 and $2.0 million. Future charges may be taken to the extent of additional option grants, which are at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

        Changes in non-vested restricted stock units during the six months ended June 30, 2008, are as follows (shares and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands):

        During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company granted 897,708 restricted stock units to employees that vest proportionately over periods of three to five years on the anniversary date of the initial grant of which 819,880 units remain outstanding as of June 30, 2008. As of June 30, 2008, there are 427,671 units, 110,220 units, and 11,083 units outstanding from restricted stock unit grants made in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The unvested restricted stock units granted after January 1, 2006 that are subject to service conditions, are paid dividends as dividends are paid on shares of the Company's Common Stock and these dividends are accounted for in a manner consistent with the Company's Common Stock dividends, as a reduction to retained earnings.

        During the first quarter of 2008, the Company also granted 478,856 market condition-based restricted stock units to employees that cliff vest on December 31, 2010, only if the total shareholder return on the Company's common stock is at least 20% (compounded annually, including dividends) from the date of the

32

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 11—Stock-Based Compensation Plans and Employee Benefits (Continued)

award through the end of the vesting period. No dividends will be paid on these units unless and until they are vested. As of June 30, 2008, there are 476,195 market condition-based restricted stock units outstanding

        For accounting purposes, the Company measures compensation costs for restricted stock units, not including any contingently issuable shares, as of the date of the grant using the market price of the Company's common stock and expenses such amounts against earnings either at the grant date (if no vesting period exists or ratably over the respective vesting/service period). The fair value of the market condition-based restricted stock is based on the grant-date market value of the awards utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation model to simulate a range of possible future stock prices for the Company's common stock. The following are the assumptions used to estimate the grant date fair value of these awards:

        The Company recorded $8.0 million and $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $12.8 million and $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, of stock based compensation expense in "General and administrative" costs on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of June 30, 2008, there was $34.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock units. That cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting/service period for the respective grants.

High Performance Unit Program

        The Company's High Performance Unit (HPU) program and Senior Executive HPU program are performance-based employee compensation plans that have significant value to the participants only if the Company provides superior returns to its shareholders. The programs are more fully described in the Company's annual proxy statement and in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. If at the end of the three-year valuation period ending on December 31, 2008, the total rate of shareholder return on the Company's common stock exceeds certain performance thresholds, the HPU participants and Senior Executive HPU participants of the 2008 plans will receive cash distributions in the nature of dividends payable on a calculated equivalent amount of our common stock, as defined by the plan documents, after the respective valuation dates. However, if the total rate of shareholder return for the relevant valuation period does not exceed these performance thresholds, then the HPU shares only have a nominal value.

        The 2008 plan under the HPU Program has 5,000 shares of High Performance Common Stock and had an aggregate initial purchase price of $0.8 million. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had received net contributions of $0.8 million under the 2008 plan.

        The 2008 plan under the Senior Executive HPU Program has 5,000 shares of High Performance Common Stock and had an aggregate initial purchase price of $0.5 million. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had received net contributions of $0.5 million under the 2008 plan.

401(k) Plan

        The Company made gross contributions of approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company made gross contributions of approximately $1.1 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

33

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12—Earnings Per Share

        EPS is calculated using the two-class method, pursuant to EITF 03-6. The two-class method is required as the Company's HPU shares each have the right to receive dividends should dividends be declared on the Company's Common Stock. HPU holders are Company employees or former employees who purchased high performance common stock units under the Company's High Performance Unit Program.

        The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 for common shares (in thousands, except per share data):

Explanatory Note:

---

(1)

For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes the allocable portions of $1 and $28 of joint venture income, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes the allocable portions of $2 and $56 of joint venture income, respectively.

34

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12—Earnings Per Share (Continued)

        As more fully described in Note 11, HPU shares are sold to employees as part of a performance-based employee compensation plan. As of June 30, 2008, the 2002-2007 HPU plans have vested, however, the 2005, 2006 and 2007 plans did not meet the required performance thresholds. Therefore, the Company redeemed the HPU shares from its employees at nominal value. The 2002-2004 plans each have 5,000 shares outstanding. The shares in each plan receive dividends based on a common stock equivalent that is separately determined for each plan depending on the Company's performance during a three-year valuation period. These HPU Shares are treated as a separate class of common stock under EITF 03-06. The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 for HPU shares (in thousands, except per share data):

Explanatory Note:

---

(1)

For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes the allocable portion of $1 and $28 of joint venture income, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 includes the allocable portion of $2 and $56 of joint venture income, respectively.

35

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 12—Earnings Per Share (Continued)

        For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the following shares were anti-dilutive (in thousands):

Note 13—Comprehensive Income

        Total comprehensive income was $53.2 million and $118.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $127.7 million and $208.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The primary components of comprehensive income, other than net income, consist of amounts attributable to the Company's cash flow hedges and changes in the fair value of the Company's available-for-sale investments. The statement of comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):

        Unrealized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale securities and cash flow hedges are recorded as adjustments to shareholders' equity through "Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses)" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets and are not included in net income unless realized.

        As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) reflected in the Company's shareholders' equity is comprised of the following (in thousands):

36

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 14—Dividends

        In order to maintain its election to qualify as a REIT, the Company must currently distribute, at a minimum, an amount equal to 90% of its taxable income and must distribute 100% of its taxable income to avoid paying corporate federal income taxes. The Company anticipates it will distribute all of its taxable income to its shareholders. Because taxable income differs from cash flow from operations due to non-cash revenues and expenses (such as depreciation and certain asset impairments), in certain circumstances, the Company may generate operating cash flow in excess of its dividends or, alternatively, may be required to borrow to make sufficient dividend payments.

        Total dividends declared by the Company aggregated $117.0 million or $0.87 per share of Common Stock during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and were paid on April 30, 2008 to shareholders of record and holders of certain share equivalents on March 17, 2008. On July 1, 2008, the Company declared a dividend of approximately $116.6 million or $0.87 per common share payable to shareholders of record and holders of certain share equivalents on July 15, 2008. The Company also declared and paid dividends aggregating $4.0 million, $5.5 million, $3.9 million, $3.4 million and $4.7 million on its Series D, E, F, G, and I preferred stock, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2008. There are no dividend arrearages on any of the preferred shares currently outstanding.

        The Company pays dividends to the unit holders in the 2002, 2003, and 2004 HPU Plans in the same amount per equivalent share and on the same distribution dates as the Company's common stock, based on 819,254 shares, 987,149 shares and 1,031,875 shares, respectively. Therefore, in connection with the common dividend declared during the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company paid dividends on April 30, 2008 of $0.7 million, $0.9 million and $0.9 million to the unit holders in the 2002, 2003 and 2004 HPU Plans, respectively. In connection with the common dividend declared on July 1, 2008, the Company will pay dividends of $0.7 million, $0.9 million, and $0.9 million to the unit holders in the 2002, 2003, and 2004 HPU Plans, respectively.

        The Company also pays dividends on outstanding restricted stock units with service conditions that were granted to employees after January 1, 2006, in the same amount per unit and on the same distribution dates as the Company's common stock. Therefore, in connection with the common dividends declared during the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company paid dividends on April 30, 2008 of $1.3 million to employees based on 1.5 million restricted stock units outstanding as of March 17, 2008. In connection with the common dividend declared on July 1, 2008, the Company will pay dividends of $1.2 million to employees based on 1.4 million restricted stock units outstanding as of the record date.

Note 15—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS No. 157 applies to all financial assets and financial liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. The statement requires fair value measurement be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

37

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 15—Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis by the above SFAS No. 157 categories as of June 30, 2008 (in thousands):

        Currently, the Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and foreign currency derivatives to manage its interest rate and foreign currency risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. To comply with the provisions of SFAS No. 157, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty's nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

        Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of June 30, 2008, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

        Other lending investments—securities and marketable securities are all securities traded actively in the secondary market and have been valued using quoted market prices.

        All of the Company's loans identified as being impaired under the provisions of SFAS No. 114 are collateral dependent loans and are evaluated for impairment by comparing the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell to the carrying value of each loan. Due to the nature of the individual property collateralizing the Company's loans, the Company uses the income approach through internally developed valuation models to estimate the fair value of the collateral. This approach requires the Company to make significant judgments in respect to discount rates and the timing and amounts of estimated future cash

38

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 15—Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)

flows that are considered Level 3 inputs in accordance with SFAS No. 157. These cash flows include costs of completion, operating costs, and lot and unit sale prices.

        The Company periodically evaluates its cost method investments to determine whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred in that period that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. If an impairment indicator is present, the Company estimates the fair value of the investment using internally developed valuation models that rely primarily on the market comparables.

Note 16—Segment Reporting

        The Company has determined that it has two reportable operating segments: Real Estate Lending and Corporate Tenant Leasing. The reportable segments were determined based on the management approach, which looks to the Company's internal organizational structure. These two lines of business require different support infrastructures.

        The Real Estate Lending segment includes all of the Company's activities related to senior and mezzanine real estate debt and senior and mezzanine corporate capital investment activities and the financing thereof. These include a dedicated management team for real estate and corporate lending origination, acquisition and servicing.

        The Corporate Tenant Leasing segment includes all of the Company's activities related to the ownership and leasing of corporate facilities.

39

---

Table of Contents

iStar Financial Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 16—Segment Reporting (Continued)

        The Company evaluates performance based on the following financial measures for each segment (in thousands):

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

Corporate and Other represents all corporate level items, including general and administrative expenses and any intercompany eliminations necessary to reconcile to the consolidated Company totals. This caption also includes the Company's timber operations, non-CTL related joint venture investments, strategic investments and marketable securities, which are not considered material separate segments.

(2)

Total revenue represents all revenue earned during the period from the assets in each segment. Revenue from the Real Estate Lending business primarily represents interest income and revenue from the Corporate Tenant Leasing business primarily represents operating lease income.

(3)

Total operating and interest expense includes provision for loan losses for the Real Estate Lending business and operating costs on CTL assets for the Corporate Tenant Leasing business, as well as interest expense and loss on early extinguishment of debt specifically related to each segment. Interest expense on unsecured notes and the unsecured and secured revolving credit facilities and general and administrative expense is included in Corporate/Other for all periods. Depreciation and amortization of $24.9 million and $21.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $49.6 million and $40.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are included in the amounts presented above.

(4)

Net operating income represents income before minority interest, income from discontinued operations, gain from discontinued operations and gain on sale of joint venture interest.

(5)

Total long-lived assets are comprised of Loans and other lending investments, net, Corporate tenant lease assets, net, and timber and timberlands, net for the Real Estate Lending, Corporate Tenant Leasing and Corporate/Other segments, respectively.

Note 17—Subsequent Events

        On July 31, 2008, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a $50 million Common Stock share repurchase program. This program is in addition to the Company's previously disclosed 5.0 million share program (see Note 9 for further detail).

        Subsequent to June 30, 2008, an issuer of a security held by the Company, which had an aggregate carrying value of $63.4 million as of June 30, 2008, declared bankruptcy. The Company recorded an other-than-temporary impairment charge on this security based on its market price as of June 30, 2008 and will continue to evaluate this security for impairment in future periods.

40

---

Table of Contents

Item 2.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

        This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting our consolidated operating results, financial condition and liquidity and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes in this quarterly report on form 10-Q and our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "2007 Annual Report"). These historical financial statements may not be indicative of our future performance. We reclassified certain items in our consolidated financial statements of prior periods to conform to our current financial statements presentation. This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risks described in Item 1a. "Risk Factors" in our 2007 Annual Report.

Introduction

        iStar Financial Inc. is a leading publicly-traded finance company focused on the commercial real estate industry. We primarily provide custom-tailored financing to high-end private and corporate owners of real estate, including senior and mezzanine real estate debt, senior and mezzanine corporate capital, corporate net lease financing and equity. Our company, which is taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT"), seeks to deliver strong dividends and superior risk-adjusted returns on equity to shareholders by providing innovative and value added financing solutions to our customers. Our two primary lines of business are lending and corporate tenant leasing.

        Our primary sources of revenues are interest income, which is the interest that our borrowers pay on our loans, and operating lease income, which is the rent that our corporate customers pay us to lease our CTL properties. A smaller and more variable source of revenue is other income, which consists primarily of prepayment penalties and realized gains that occur when our borrowers repay their loans before the maturity date. We primarily generate income through the "spread" or "margin," which is the difference between the revenues generated from our loans and leases and our interest expense and the cost of our CTL operations. We generally seek to match-fund our revenue generating assets with either fixed or floating rate debt of a similar maturity so that changes in interest rates or the shape of the yield curve will have a minimal impact on our earnings.

Executive Overview

        The credit crisis, which began in earnest in mid-2007, has significantly impacted corporate credit spreads, increasing our cost of funds and limiting our access to the unsecured debt markets—our primary source of debt financing. The current financial turmoil has also adversely impacted certain of our borrowers' ability to service their debt and refinance their loans as they mature. In addition, a large percentage of our portfolio is residential condominium construction loans and land intended to be used for residential development. The proceeds from residential condominium sales are generally used to repay principal on our loans. The slow down in residential sales due to falling home prices and reduced availability in the single family mortgage market and concerns over the capital adequacy of U.S. Government-sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have contributed to significant deterioration in the overall financial markets and the ability of some of our borrowers to repay.

        We generated $31.1 million of net income on over $324.1 million of revenue resulting in $0.15 of diluted earnings per common share and $(1.46) of adjusted diluted earnings per common share.

        Our new commitments for the second quarter totaled $13.0 million in two separate transactions and we funded $2.6 million of these commitments during the quarter. However, we also funded $978.5 million of pre-existing commitments during the quarter and received gross principal repayments of approximately $1.18 billion. We ended the quarter with $15.62 billion in total assets and $17.50 billion in assets under management (including participated assets).

41

---

Table of Contents

        Our results of operations continue to be impacted by the credit crisis. It has also had a negative impact on the value of some of our investments. Based on increased risks in our loan portfolio, as well as the deterioration in economic and financial conditions, we had provisions for loan losses of $276.7 million this quarter, versus $5.0 million in the second quarter of 2007. As the severity and longevity of the credit crisis has continued, we have had material increases in our watch list and non-performing loans.

Key Performance Measures

        We use the following metrics to measure our profitability:

•

Adjusted Diluted EPS, calculated as adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders divided by diluted weighted average common shares outstanding. (See section captioned "Adjusted Earnings" for more information on this metric).



•

Net Finance Margin, calculated as the rate of return on assets less the cost of debt. The rate of return on assets is the sum of interest income and operating lease income, divided by the sum of the average book value of gross corporate tenant lease assets, loans and other lending investments, purchased intangibles and assets held for sale over the period. The cost of debt is the sum of interest expense and operating costs for corporate tenant lease assets, divided by the average book value of gross debt obligations during the period.



•

Return on Average Common Book Equity, calculated as net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders divided by average common book equity.



•

Adjusted Return on Average Common Book Equity, calculated as adjusted basic earnings allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders divided by average common book equity.

The following table summarizes these key metrics:

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, operating lease income used to calculate the net finance margin includes amounts from discontinued operations of $3,434 and $342, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, operating costs—corporate tenant lease assets used to calculate the net finance margin includes amounts from discontinued operations of $(169) and $24, respectively.



(2)

Net finance margin for the three months ended June 30, 2008 includes the amortization of the Fremont CRE loan purchase discount of $16.9 million. Excluding this amortization, the net finance margin would have been 2.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2008.

42

---

Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2007

Revenue

        The increase in total revenue in the second quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007 was primarily due to additional interest income of $73.8 million resulting from the Fremont CRE acquisition. Included in this interest on the acquired loans was $16.9 million of discount amortization related to the initial purchase discount that we recorded on the Fremont CRE acquisition. This was offset by a decrease in interest income due to a decrease in the average outstanding balance of loans and other lending investments in our core portfolio, excluding the loans acquired from Fremont CRE, and an increase in our non-performing loans. In addition, there was a decrease in interest income on the Company's variable-rate lending investments as a result of lower average one-month LIBOR rates of 2.6% in the second quarter of 2008, compared to 5.3% in the second quarter of 2007.

        Operating lease income also contributed to the increase in total revenue primarily due to increased income from properties acquired in 2007 and in 2008.

        Other income was lower in the second quarter of 2008 than the second quarter of 2007 primarily due to a decrease in income from prepayment penalties. During the second quarter of 2008 other income included income from loan prepayment penalties and loan repayments of $5.9 million and other income of $1.9 million. During the second quarter 2007, other income included income from loan prepayment penalties and loan repayments of $31.5 million, and other income of $6.4 million.

Interest Expense

        During the second quarter of 2008, our average outstanding debt balance was $3.91 billion higher than it was during the same period in 2007, resulting in the majority of the increase in interest expense. The increase in borrowings was attributed to the interim financing facility used to finance the Fremont CRE acquisition, increased borrowings on both of our unsecured and secured credit facilities, as well as the new secured term loans in 2008. Higher borrowings were partially offset by lower average rates, which decreased to 4.71% during the second quarter of 2008 as compared to 5.68% during the same period in 2007.

43

---

Table of Contents

Other Costs and Expenses

        Total other costs and expenses increased by approximately $376.1 million primarily due to the increase in our provision for loan losses and non-cash asset impairment charges recorded during the second quarter of 2008.

        The $271.7 million increase in our provision for loan losses was attributed to additional asset-specific reserves as well as negative trends in the overall economy and growth in our historical portfolio and our acquired loan portfolio, as further described in the "Risk Management" section.

        At the end of the second quarter of 2008 due to an overall deterioration in market conditions within the commercial real estate lending environment, as evidenced by our increased provision for loan losses and a decrease in expected originations, we evaluated our goodwill for impairment. As a result of our analysis, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $39.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill in our real estate lending reporting unit to zero.

        In addition, we recorded a non-cash charge of $12.5 million, reflected in "Impairment of other assets", to reduce the carrying value of certain intangible assets related to the Fremont CRE acquisition based on their revised estimated fair values.

        Also included in "Impairment of other assets" are non-cash impairment charges of $40.0 million related to certain held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities in our loans and other lending investments portfolio as well as a $5.2 million non-cash impairment charge for a cost method investment included in our other investments portfolio. Each of these impairments were determined based on our assessment that the decline in fair value of these securities was other than temporary.

Other Components of Net Income

         Gain on sale of joint venture interest, net of minority interest—On April 1, 2008, we closed on the sale of our TimberStar Southwest joint venture and the venture's approximately 900,000-acre portfolio of forestland and related assets for a gross sales price of $1.71 billion, including the assumption of debt. We received net proceeds of approximately $417.0 million for our interest in the venture and recorded a gain of $261.7 million, net of minority interest.

         Earnings (losses) from equity method investments—Earnings from equity method investments increased to $6.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to a loss of $0.1 million for the same period in 2007, primarily due to the sale of our TimberStar Southwest joint venture, as described above. Our share of losses from this venture was $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to losses of $3.2 million during the same period in 2007.

         Income from discontinued operations—For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, operating income earned by the Company on CTL and timber assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale of approximately $3.7 million and $9.3 million, respectively, is classified as "discontinued operations," even

44

---

Table of Contents

though such income was recognized by the Company prior to the asset dispositions or classification as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

         Gain from discontinued operations—During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we sold a portfolio of 32 CTL assets to one buyer and also sold four CTL assets to three different buyers for aggregate net proceeds of $245.1 million, and recognized gains of approximately $23.3 million. In addition, we also closed on the sale of our Maine Timber property for net proceeds of $152.9 million resulting in a gain of $23.4 million, net of minority interest.

        During the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company disposed of four CTL assets for net proceeds of $29.8 million and recognized a gain of approximately $5.4 million.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007

Revenue

        The increase in total revenue in the first six months of 2008 compared to the first six months of 2007 was primarily due to additional interest income of $159.8 million resulting from the Fremont CRE acquisition. Included in this interest on the acquired loans was $45.2 million of discount amortization related to the initial purchase discount that we recorded on the Fremont CRE acquisition. This was offset by a decrease in interest income due to a decrease in the average outstanding balance of loans and other lending investments in our core portfolio, excluding the loans acquired from Fremont CRE, and an increase in our non-performing loans. In addition, there was a decrease in interest income on the Company's variable-rate lending investments as a result of lower average one-month LIBOR rates of 2.9% in the first six months of 2008, compared to 5.3% in the first six months of 2007.

        Operating lease income also contributed to the increase in total revenue primarily due to increased income from properties that were acquired and have become fully operational in the second half of 2007 and 2008.

        Other income for the first half of 2008 was essentially the same as compared to the first half of 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, other income primarily included income from loan prepayment penalties and loan repayments of $14.8 million and a $44.9 million gain resulting from the redemption of a participation interest that was received as part of a prior lending investment. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, other income included income from loan prepayment penalties and loan repayments of $32.2 million and income from a loan participation feature of $19.0 million.

Interest Expense

45

---

Table of Contents

        During the first half of 2008, our average outstanding debt balance was $4.14 billion higher than it was during the same period in 2007, resulting in the majority of the increase in interest expense. The increase in borrowings was attributed to the interim financing facility used to finance the Fremont CRE acquisition, increased borrowings on both our unsecured and secured credit facilities as well as the new secured term loans in 2008. Higher borrowings were partially offset by lower average rates, which decreased to 5.03% during the first half of 2008 as compared to 5.77% during the same period in 2007.

Other Costs and Expenses

        Total other costs and expenses increased by approximately $474.5 million primarily due to the increase in our provisions for loan losses and non-cash asset impairment charges recorded during the first half of 2008.

        The $356.2 million increase in our provision for loan losses was attributed to additional asset-specific reserves as well as negative trends in the overall economy and growth in our historical portfolio and our acquired loan portfolio, as further described in the "Risk Management" section.

        At the end of the second quarter of 2008, due to an overall deterioration in market conditions within the commercial real estate lending environment, as evidenced by our increased specific provision for loan losses and a decrease in expected originations we evaluated our goodwill for impairment. As a result of our analysis, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $39.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the goodwill in our real estate lending reporting unit to zero.

        In addition, we recorded a non-cash charge of $12.5 million, reflected in "Impairment of other assets", to reduce the carrying value of certain intangible assets related to the Fremont CRE acquisition, based on their revised estimated fair values.

        Also included in "Impairment of other assets" are non-cash impairment charges of $40.0 million related to certain held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities in our loans and other lending investments portfolio as well as a $5.2 million non-cash impairment charge for a cost method investment included in our other investments portfolio. Each of these impairments were determined based on our assessment that the decline in fair value of these securities was other than temporary.

        General and administrative expenses increased $9.8 million primarily due to higher payroll related costs resulting from increased headcount as a result of the Fremont acquisition in July 2007.

        Depreciation and amortization increased $9.3 million as a result of the acquisitions and improvements of new CTL assets.

46

---

Table of Contents

Other Components of Net Income

         Gain on sale of joint venture interest, net of minority interest—On April 1, 2008, we closed on the sale of our TimberStar Southwest joint venture and the venture's approximately 900,000-acre portfolio of forestland and related assets for a gross sales price of $1.71 billion, including the assumption of debt. We received net proceeds of approximately $417.0 million for our interest in the venture and recorded a gain of $261.7 million, net of minority interest.

         Earnings (losses) from equity method investments—Earnings from equity method investments increased to $3.5 million for the first six months of 2008 compared to a loss of $1.5 million for the same period in 2007, primarily due to the sale of our TimberStar Southwest joint venture, as described above. Our share of losses from this venture was $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to losses of $7.2 million during the same period in 2007.

         Income from discontinued operations—For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, operating income earned by the Company on CTL and timber assets sold (prior to their sale) and assets held for sale of approximately $9.2 million and $19.2 million, respectively, is classified as "discontinued operations," even though such income was recognized by the Company prior to the asset dispositions or classification as "Assets held for sale" on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

         Gain from discontinued operations—During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we sold a portfolio of 32 CTL assets to one buyer and also six CTL assets to five different buyers for net aggregate proceeds of $253.3 million, and recognized gains of approximately $25.4 million. In addition, we also closed on the sale of our Maine Timber property for net proceeds of $152.9 million resulting in a gain of $23.4 million, net of minority interest.

        During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company disposed of six CTL assets for net proceeds of $64.7 million and recognized gains of approximately $6.8 million.

Adjusted Earnings

        We measure our performance using adjusted earnings in addition to net income. Adjusted earnings represent net income allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders computed in accordance with GAAP, before depreciation, depletion, amortization, gain from discontinued operations, ineffectiveness on interest rate hedges, impairments of goodwill and intangible assets, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. Adjustments for joint ventures reflect our share of adjusted earnings calculated on the same basis.

        We believe that adjusted earnings is a helpful measure to consider, in addition to net income, because this measure helps us to evaluate how our commercial real estate finance business is performing compared to other commercial finance companies, without the effects of certain GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of current operating performance. The most significant GAAP adjustments that we exclude in determining adjusted earnings are depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments of goodwill and intangible assets, which are typically non-cash charges. As a commercial finance company that focuses on real estate and corporate lending and corporate tenant leasing, we record significant depreciation on our real estate assets, depletion on our timber assets, and amortization of deferred financing costs associated with our borrowings. Depreciation, depletion and amortization do not affect our daily operations, but they do impact financial results under GAAP. By measuring our performance using adjusted earnings and net income, we are able to evaluate how our business is performing both before and after giving effect to recurring GAAP adjustments such as depreciation, depletion and amortization (including earnings from joint venture interests on the same basis) and excluding impairments of goodwill and intangible assets which are non-recurring items and gains or losses from the sale of assets that will no longer be part of continuing operations.

47

---

Table of Contents

        Adjusted earnings is not an alternative or substitute for net income in accordance with GAAP as a measure of our performance. Rather, we believe that adjusted earnings is an additional measure that helps us analyze how our business is performing. This measure is also used to track compliance with covenants in certain of our material borrowing arrangements that have covenants based upon this measure. Adjusted earnings should not be viewed as an alternative measure of either our operating liquidity or funds available for our cash needs or for distribution to our shareholders. In addition, we may not calculate adjusted earnings in the same manner as other companies that use a similarly titled measure.

Explanatory Note:

---

(1)

HPU holders are Company employees who purchased high performance common stock units under the Company's High Performance Unit Program. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, adjusted diluted earnings allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders includes $(4,139) and $2,886 of adjusted earnings (loss) allocable to HPU holders, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, adjusted diluted earnings (loss) allocable to common shareholders and HPU holders includes $(1,668) and $5,519 of adjusted earnings (loss) allocable to HPU holders, respectively

48

---

Table of Contents

Risk Management

         Loan Credit Statistics—The table below summarizes our non-performing loans and details the reserve for loan losses associated with our loans (in thousands):

Explanatory Note:

---

(1)

Non-performing loans includes our carrying value and the Fremont CRE participation interest on the associated assets.

         Non-Performing Loans—All non-performing loans are placed on non-accrual status and income is recognized only upon actual cash receipt. We designate loans as non-performing at such time as: (1) management determines the borrower is incapable of, or has ceased efforts towards, curing the cause of an impairment; (2) the loan becomes 90 days delinquent; or (3) the loan has a maturity default. As of June 30, 2008, we had 39 non-performing loans with an aggregate carrying value of $1.07 billion and an aggregate gross loan value of $1.34 billion, or 10.5% of total gross loan value. Given the changing current commercial real estate market conditions, the process of estimating collateral values and reserves will continue to require significant judgment on the part of management. Management believes there is adequate collateral and reserves to support the book values of the loans.

         Watch List Assets—We conduct a quarterly comprehensive credit review, resulting in an individual risk rating being assigned to each asset. This review is designed to enable management to evaluate and proactively manage asset- specific credit issues and identify credit trends on a portfolio-wide basis as an "early warning system." As of June 30, 2008, we had 30 assets on the credit watch list, excluding those assets included in non-performing loans above, with an aggregate carrying value of $1.28 billion and an aggregate gross loan value of $1.45 billion, or 11.4% of total gross loan value.

         Reserve For Loan Losses—During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we added $242.2 million to the reserve for loan losses, which was the result of $366.2 million of provisioning for loan losses reduced by $123.9 million of charge-offs. The reserve is generally increased through the provision for loan losses, which reduces income in the period recorded and reduced through actual charge-offs.

        The reserve for loan losses includes an asset-specific component and a formula-based component. As of June 30, 2008, we had $237.2 million of asset-specific reserves related to 30 non-performing loans. A reserve is established for a non-performing loan when the estimated fair value of the loan less costs to sell is lower than the carrying value of the loan. All of our non-performing loans were tested for impairment as of June 30, 2008.

49

---

Table of Contents

        The formula-based general reserve was $223.0 million on June 30, 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we have increased reserves to reflect the continued deterioration in the overall credit markets and its impact on our portfolio. Required balances for this reserve are derived from probabilities of principal loss and loss given default estimates assigned to the portfolio during the Company's quarterly internal risk rating assessment. Probabilities of principal loss and severity factors are based on industry and/or internal experience and may be adjusted for significant factors that, based on the Company's judgment, impact the collectability of the loans as of the balance sheet date.

         Other Real Estate Owned—During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we acquired by foreclosure, or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, property valued at $218.7 million. The carrying value of the loans that these properties collateralized at the time we took title was $265.3 million. The transfer of these assets from loans to OREO resulted in $46.6 million in charge-offs against the reserve for loan losses. In addition, during the six months ended June 30, 2008 we sold two of the properties held in OREO for net proceeds of $81.3 million, resulting in a gain of $0.5 million. We also sold units within the OREO properties during the six months ended June 30, 2008 for net proceeds of $5.0 million.

         Gross Loan Value—Gross Loan Value of a loan is computed by adding iStar's carrying value of the loan and the participation interest sold on the Fremont CRE portfolio. It represents what the carrying value of the loan would have been if the loan participation had not occurred. Under the terms of the participation, the Fremont CRE participation will receive 70% of all loan principal payments, including principal that iStar has funded. Therefore, iStar is in the first loss position and we believe that presentation of the Gross Loan Value is more relevant than a presentation of our carrying value when discussing our risk of loss on the loans in the Fremont CRE Portfolio.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        We require significant capital to fund our investment activities and operating expenses. While the distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code limit our ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital committed to our operations, we believe we have sufficient access to capital resources to fund our existing business plan, which includes our real estate and corporate lending and corporate tenant leasing businesses. Our capital sources include cash flow from operations, borrowings under lines of credit, additional term borrowings, unsecured corporate debt financing, financings secured by our assets, trust preferred debt, and the issuance of common, convertible and/or preferred equity securities. Further, we may acquire other businesses or assets using our capital stock, cash or a combination thereof.

        Liquidity in the capital markets has been severely constrained since the beginning of the credit crisis, increasing our cost of funds and limiting our access to the unsecured debt markets- our primary source of debt financing. However during 2008, we have generated approximately $2.87 billion in liquidity through various capital markets initiatives and strategic asset sales. Such transactions included $1.30 billion of secured financings, $750.0 million of unsecured financings and net proceeds totaling $823.2 million associated with strategic asset sales of our Timber investments and certain CTL portfolio assets. We used a portion of the proceeds from these transactions to repay the $1.29 billion balance outstanding on the interim facility that we used to acquire Fremont and as a result our only remaining long-term debt obligation in 2008 is $50.3 million of senior notes maturing in August 2008.

        As of June 30, 2008 we had $1.42 billion of cash and credit facility available, and expect to receive additional proceeds from asset repayments during the third and fourth quarters. We expect amounts available under our credit facilities, repayments received from our existing loans and proceeds generated from certain asset sales will be sufficient to meet our near term liquidity needs including the senior notes due in August 2008. As a result we do not expect to raise additional debt or equity in the capital markets this year. However, our ability to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements will be impacted by our borrowers' ability to repay their obligations to us and our ability to execute certain asset sales. Therefore, we

50

---

Table of Contents

will continue to assess the market and consider raising additional liquidity through the issuance of unsecured debt or equity, at a higher cost of funds than our secured financing alternatives, if necessary.

        Our ability to obtain additional debt and equity financing will depend in part on our ability to comply with the financial covenants in our unsecured credit facilities and our publicly held debt securities, as further described in the Debt Covenants section below. In addition, any decision by our lenders and investors to provide us with additional financing will depend upon a number of other factors, such as our compliance with the terms of existing credit arrangements, our financial performance, our credit rating, industry or market trends, the general availability of and rates applicable to financing transactions, such lenders' and investors' resources and policies concerning the terms under which they make capital commitments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities. Additionally, our borrowers' abilities to access capital to repay their obligations to us may also impact our ability to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements.

        The following table outlines the contractual obligations related to our long-term debt agreements and operating lease obligations as of June 30, 2008. We have no other long-term liabilities that would constitute a contractual obligation.

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

Assumes exercise of extensions to the extent such extensions are at our option.

(2)

This table excludes $28.7 million of borrowings under secured term loans as these amounts have original maturities of less than one year.

(3)

All variable rate debt assumes a 30-day LIBOR rate of 2.46% (the 30-day LIBOR rate at June 30, 2008).

(4)

We also have a $1.0 million letter of credit outstanding as security for a corporate office lease.

(5)

We also have letters of credit outstanding totaling $13.9 million as additional collateral for two of our investments. See "Off-Balance Sheet Transactions" below, for a discussion of certain unfunded commitments related to our lending and CTL business.

        Our primary source of short-term funds is an aggregate of $3.42 billion of available credit under our two committed unsecured revolving credit facilities, which includes a $2.22 billion facility, maturing in June 2011, as well as a $1.20 billion facility, maturing in June 2012. As of June 30, 2008, there was approximately $974.5 million which was immediately available to draw under these facilities at our discretion. In addition, we have a $500.0 million secured revolving credit facility for which availability is based on percentage borrowing base calculations. There were no amounts outstanding under the secured credit facility as of June 30, 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we amended and restated our $500.0 million secured credit facility to allow us to extend the maturity from September 2008 to September 2009.

        During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we repaid all outstanding indebtedness on the interim financing facility that we used to fund the Fremont CRE acquisition in July 2007.

51

---

Table of Contents

         Unencumbered Assets/Unsecured Debt—The following table shows the ratio of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (in thousands):

Explanatory Note:

---

(1)

See Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for a more detailed description of our unsecured debt.

         Capital Markets Activity—In May 2008, we issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes bearing interest at an annual rate of 8.625% and maturing in June 2013. We primarily used the proceeds from the issuance of these securities to repay outstanding indebtedness under our unsecured revolving credit facility. We also entered into interest rate swap agreements to swap the fixed interest rate on the $750 million Senior Notes for a variable interest rate (see Note 10 for further details).

        In May 2008, we repurchased $13.6 million of our Senior Floating Rate Notes maturing in March 2009 and $10.0 million of our Senior Floating Rate Notes maturing in September 2009 in open market transactions. In connection with these repurchases, we recorded an aggregate net gain on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.6 million and reflected this as a reduction of "Other expense". We may repurchase additional debt securities that we have issued from time to time in open market transactions or privately negotiated purchases. There can be no assurance as to the timing or amount of any such repurchases.

        In March 2008, we repaid $570 million aggregate principal amount of both fixed and floating rate Senior Notes.

         Other Financing Activity—During the second quarter of 2008, we closed on a $947.9 million secured term note maturing in April 30, 2011. This note is collateralized by 34 properties in our Corporate Tenant Lease portfolio and bears interest at the greater of 6.25% or LIBOR + 3.40%.

        In March 2008, we entered into a $300 million senior secured term loan maturing in March 2009 with a six-month extension at our option. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 2.50% and are collateralized by investments included in our loans and other lending investments portfolio.

        Also in March 2008, we closed on a $53.3 million secured term note maturing in March 2011. This note is collateralized by four assets in our Corporate Tenant Lease portfolio and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.65%.

52

---

Table of Contents

        As of June 30, 2008, future scheduled maturities of outstanding long-term debt obligations are as follows (in thousands)(1)(2):

Explanatory Notes:

---

(1)

Assumes exercise of extensions to the extent such extensions are at our option.



(2)

This table excludes $28.7 million of borrowings under secured term loans as these amounts have original maturities of less than one year.

         Hedging Activities—We have variable-rate lending assets and variable-rate debt obligations. These assets and liabilities create a natural hedge against changes in variable interest rates. This means that as interest rates increase, we earn more on our variable-rate lending assets and pay more on our variable-rate debt obligations and, conversely, as interest rates decrease, we earn less on our variable-rate lending assets and pay less on our variable-rate debt obligations. When the amount of our variable-rate debt obligations exceeds the amount of our variable-rate lending assets, we use derivative instruments to limit the impact of changing interest rates on our net income. We have a policy in place, that is administered by the Audit Committee, which requires us to enter into hedging transactions to mitigate the impact of rising interest rates on our earnings. The policy states that a 100 basis point increase in short-term rates, excluding the impact of interest rate floors and ceilings in certain loan assets, cannot have a greater than 2.5% impact on quarterly earnings. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes. The derivative instruments we use are typically in the form of interest rate swaps and interest rate caps. Interest rate swaps effectively can either convert variable-rate debt obligations to fixed-rate debt obligations or convert fixed-rate debt obligations into variable-rate debt obligations. Interest rate caps effectively limit the maximum interest rate payable on variable-rate debt obligations. In addition, we also use derivative instruments to manage our exposure to foreign exchange rate movements.

        The primary risks related to our use of derivative instruments are the risks that a counterparty to a hedging arrangement could default on its obligation and the risk that we may have to pay certain costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if we terminate a hedging arrangement. As a matter of policy, we enter into hedging arrangements with counterparties that are large, creditworthy financial institutions typically rated at least A/A2 by S&P and Moody's, respectively. Our hedging strategy is approved and monitored by our Audit Committee on behalf of the Board of Directors and may be changed by the Board of Directors without shareholder approval.

        At June 30, 2008, derivatives with a fair value of $29.9 million were included in other assets and derivatives with a fair value of $25.2 million were included in other liabilities.

         Off-Balance Sheet Transactions—We are not dependent on the use of any off-balance sheet financing arrangements for liquidity.

        We have certain discretionary and non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to our loans, CTLs and other lending investments that we may be required to, or choose to, fund in the future. Discretionary commitments are those under which we have sole discretion with respect to future funding. Non-discretionary commitments are those that we are generally obligated to fund at the request of the

53

---

Table of Contents

borrower or upon the occurrence of events outside of our direct control. As of June 30, 2008, we had 215 loans with unfunded commitments totaling $3.64 billion, of which $3.12 billion was non-discretionary. In addition, we had $28.2 million of non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to four CTL investments. These commitments generally fall into two categories: (1) pre-approved capital improvement projects; and (2) new or additional construction costs. Upon completion of the improvements or construction, we would receive additional operating lease income from the customers. In addition, we have $7.1 million of non-discretionary unfunded commitments related to eight existing customers in the form of tenant improvements which were negotiated between the Company and the customers at the commencement of the leases. Further, we had 11 strategic investments with unfunded non-discretionary commitments of $249.3 million.

         Debt Covenants—Our ability to borrow under our unsecured credit facilities is dependent on maintaining compliance with various covenants, including minimum net worth as well as specified financial ratios such as fixed charge coverage, unencumbered assets to unsecured indebtedness, and leverage. As of June 30, 2008, we believe we are in full compliance with these covenants.

        Our publicly held debt securities also contain covenants for fixed charge coverage and unencumbered assets to unsecured indebtedness. If breached, the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant imposes limitations on incurrence of indebtedness. Based on our unsecured credit ratings at the end of the quarter, the financial covenants in some series of our publicly held debt securities were not operative. However, as a result of subsequent downgrades discussed below, the financial covenants in all of our publicly held debt securities are operative. We believe we are in full compliance with these covenants as of June 30, 2008; however, our ability to remain in compliance with the financial covenants will be challenged by increases in general loan loss reserves, non-performing loans and the slow-down in asset originations. See below for further discussion of ratings triggers as they relate to our covenants.

         Ratings Triggers—The two committed unsecured revolving credit facilities aggregating $3.42 billion that we had in place at June 30, 2008, bear interest at LIBOR + 0.525% per annum based on our senior unsecured credit ratings of BBB from S&P, Baa2 from Moody's and BBB from Fitch as of the end of the quarter. Our ability to borrow under our unsecured revolving credit facilities is not dependent on our credit ratings. The interest rate that we incur on borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facilities are based on the higher of our credit ratings from S&P and Moody's. Subsequent to quarter end, our senior unsecured debt ratings were downgraded one notch by Moody's and Fitch, to Baa3 and BBB-. These recent downgrades did not affect the pricing on our credit facilities. However, if we were to be downgraded by S&P, our borrowings under these facilities would bear interest at LIBOR + 0.70% per annum. Further downgrades from both S&P and Moody's would also further increase our borrowing rates under these facilities.

        As a result of these downgrades the financial covenants in our publicly held debt securities, including limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and maintenance of unencumbered assets compared to unsecured indebtedness, are operative. We believe we are currently in full compliance with these covenants.

        Except as described above, there are no other ratings triggers in any of our debt instruments or other operating or financial agreements at June 30, 2008.

         Transactions with Related Parties—We have substantial investments in minority interests of Oak Hill Advisors, L.P., Oak Hill Credit Alpha MGP LLC, OHSF GP Partners II, LLC, Oak Hill Credit Opportunities MGP, LLC, OHSF GP Partners (Investors), LLC, OHA Finance MGP, LLC, OHA Capital Solutions MGP, LLC and OHA Strategic Credit Fund. (see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail). In relation to our investment in these entities, we appointed to our Board of Directors a member that holds a substantial investment in these same eight entities. As of June 30, 2008,

54

---

Table of Contents

the carrying value in these ventures was $178.7 million. We have also invested in eight funds managed by Oak Hill Advisors, L.P., which have a carrying value of $9.2 million as of June 30, 2008.

         DRIP/Stock Purchase Plans—During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we issued a total of approximately 32,000 shares and 12,400 shares of common stock, respectively, and during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we issued approximately 57,000 and 19,800 shares of its common stock, respectively, through the dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plans. Net proceeds for each of the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was approximately $0.6 million and $1.1 million and $0.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. There are approximately 2.0 million shares available for issuance under the plan as of June 30, 2008

         Stock Repurchase Program—During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 235,000 shares of our outstanding common stock for a cost of approximately $3.7 million at an average cost per share of $15.57. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased 335,000 shares of our outstanding common stock for a cost of approximately $5.2 million at an average cost per share of $15.52. There were no shares repurchased during the three and six months ended June 30, 2007. As of June 30, 2008, there were approximately 1.4 million shares available to purchase under our 5.0 million share repurchase program. On July 31, 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors has authorized us to repurchase an additional $50 million of our common stock in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions from time to time. There can be no assurance as to the timing or amount of any such repurchases.

Critical Accounting Policies

        The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported as assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We have established detailed policies and control procedures intended to ensure that valuation methods, including any judgments made as part of such methods, are well controlled, reviewed and applied consistently from period to period. We base our estimates on historical corporate and industry experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be appropriate under the circumstances. For all of these estimates, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and, therefore, routinely require adjustment.

        A summary of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition. There have been no significant changes to our policies during 2008 except for the adoption of SFAS No. 157, as noted below. Management has reviewed and evaluated these critical accounting estimates and believes they are appropriate.

         Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the financial asset or paid to transfer the financial liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

        The degree of management judgment involved in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities is dependent upon the availability of quoted market prices or observable market parameters. For financial instruments that trade actively and have quoted market prices or observable market parameters, there is minimal subjectivity involved in measuring fair value. When observable market prices and parameters are not fully available, management judgment is necessary to estimate fair value. In addition, changes in market conditions may reduce the availability of quoted prices or observable data. For example, reduced liquidity in the capital markets or changes in secondary market activities could result in observable market inputs becoming unavailable. Therefore, when market data is not available, we would use valuation techniques requiring more management judgment to estimate the appropriate fair value measurement.

        See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion on our use of fair valuation of financial assets and financial liabilities and the related measurement techniques.

55

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

        There have been no material changes in Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for the first six months of 2008 as compared to the disclosures included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. See discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk under "Item 2—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

56

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

        The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company has formed a disclosure committee that is responsible for considering the materiality of information and determining the disclosure obligations of the Company on a timely basis. The disclosure committee reports directly to the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer is currently a member of the disclosure committee.

        As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the disclosure committee and other members of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

        There have been no changes during the last fiscal quarter in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in the Company's periodic reports.

57

---

Table of Contents

(This page has been left blank intentionally.)

58

---

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Arnold v. iStar Financial Inc., et al.

        On April 16, 2008, Lee Arnold, a purported shareholder of the Company, filed a Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against current and former members of the Board of Directors and several current executive officers, and named the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duties, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment and violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, resulting from an alleged failure to disclose the impact of the Company's acquisition of the commercial real estate business and portfolio of Fremont Investment and Loan. Plaintiff alleges that this conduct has caused substantial monetary losses to the Company and seeks restitution, attorneys' fees and costs, corporate governance reforms and other equitable relief.

Securities Class Action Litigations

        Two purported class action lawsuits are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On April 14, 2008, Citiline Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit and on April 24, 2008, Dennis Christenson filed a substantially similar lawsuit. Both suits are purportedly filed on behalf of the same putative class of investors who purchased common stock in the Company's December 13, 2007 public offering. The complaints name the Company and certain of its current executive officers as defendants and allege violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in connection with the December 2007 public offering. The complaints seek certification as a class action, compensatory damages plus interest and attorneys' fees, and rescission of the public offering. The Court has not yet appointed a lead plaintiff for this litigation, no class has been certified and discovery has not begun.

        The Company and the individual defendants believe these suits have no merit and intend to defend themselves vigorously against the actions.

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

        No changes from those disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.

ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

        The following table sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the Company of its common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2008:

Explanatory Note:

---

(1)

In 1999, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase, from time to time, on the open market or otherwise, of up to 5.0 million shares of its Common Stock at prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. There is no fixed expiration date to this plan.

59

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 3.   DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

        None

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

        The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company was held on May 28, 2008.

        1.    Election of Directors:    At the meeting, seven directors were elected for terms expiring in 2009. For each nominee, the numbers of votes cast for and withheld were as follows:

        2.    Non-Employee Directors' Deferral Plan:    Also at the meeting, the shareholders approved the proposal to reauthorize the issuance of common stock equivalents to non-employee directors as part of their annual directors' compensation under the iStar Financial Inc. Non-Employee Directors' Deferral Plan. The numbers of votes cast for and against the proposal and the number of abstentions were as follows:

        3.    Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:    Also at the meeting, the shareholders ratified the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2008. The number of votes cast for and against the ratification of the selection of independent registered public accounting firm and the number of abstentions were as follows:

ITEM 5.    OTHER INFORMATION

        None

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS

a.     Exhibits

4.1

Twentieth Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 21, 2008 between iStar Financial Inc. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 27, 2008).



4.2

Global Note evidencing 8.625% Senior Notes due 2013 issued on May 21, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 27, 2008).



10.1

Form of restricted stock unit award agreement (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's March 31, 2008 Form 10-Q).



31.0

Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.



32.0

Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

60

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

61

---