UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
Summer Infant, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Commission file number 001-33346
Delaware |
|
20-1994619 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction Of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
1275 Park East Drive |
|
|
Woonsocket, RI 02895 |
|
(401) 671-6550 |
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code) |
|
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the last 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of, October 31, 2012, there were 18,126,280 shares outstanding of the registrants Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share.
Summer Infant, Inc.
Form 10-Q
|
|
Page Number |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 | |
|
|
|
|
3 | |
|
|
|
|
4 | |
|
|
|
|
5 | |
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
12 | |
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 |
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Summer Infant, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
Note that all amounts presented in the table below are in thousands of dollars except share amounts and par value amounts.
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
| ||
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11,899 |
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
53,033 |
|
47,670 |
| ||
Inventory, net |
|
48,629 |
|
50,014 |
| ||
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
3,026 |
|
4,095 |
| ||
Deferred tax assets |
|
265 |
|
265 |
| ||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
|
116,852 |
|
103,259 |
| ||
Property and equipment, net |
|
16,599 |
|
17,682 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
|
|
61,908 |
| ||
Intangible assets, net |
|
20,929 |
|
30,045 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
398 |
|
21 |
| ||
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
154,778 |
|
$ |
212,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ |
38,181 |
|
$ |
40,633 |
|
Current portion of long term debt |
|
584 |
|
736 |
| ||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
38,765 |
|
41,369 |
| ||
Long term debt, less current portion |
|
76,838 |
|
62,479 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
3,539 |
|
3,726 |
| ||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
4,594 |
|
11,439 |
| ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
|
123,736 |
|
119,013 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common Stock $.0001 par value, issued and outstanding 18,126,280 and 17,717,667 shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
|
2 |
|
2 |
| ||
Treasury Stock at cost (271,649 shares at September 30, 2012 and 141,134 shares at December 31, 2011) |
|
(1,283 |
) |
(956 |
) | ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
72,668 |
|
71,158 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
(40,232 |
) |
24,301 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) |
|
(113 |
) |
(603 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
31,042 |
|
93,902 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
154,778 |
|
$ |
212,915 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Summer Infant, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Note that all amounts presented in the table below are in thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts.
|
|
Unaudited |
|
Unaudited |
| ||||||||
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
63,984 |
|
$ |
63,342 |
|
$ |
188,714 |
|
$ |
182,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of goods sold |
|
44,359 |
|
41,347 |
|
127,198 |
|
120,895 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross profit |
|
19,625 |
|
21,995 |
|
61,516 |
|
61,908 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
18,178 |
|
16,976 |
|
53,447 |
|
49,794 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Depreciation and Amortization |
|
2,050 |
|
1,562 |
|
5,728 |
|
4,646 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangibles |
|
70,198 |
|
|
|
70,198 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net operating income (loss) |
|
(70,801 |
) |
3,457 |
|
(67,857 |
) |
7,468 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(938 |
) |
(774 |
) |
(2,557 |
) |
(2,096 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
(71,739 |
) |
2,683 |
|
(70,414 |
) |
5,372 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
(6,310 |
) |
604 |
|
(5,883 |
) |
1,209 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
(65,429 |
) |
$ |
2,079 |
|
$ |
(64,531 |
) |
$ |
4,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
BASIC |
|
$ |
(3.65 |
) |
$ |
.12 |
|
$ |
(3.61 |
) |
$ |
.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
DILUTED |
|
$ |
(3.65 |
) |
$ |
.11 |
|
$ |
(3.61 |
) |
$ |
.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
BASIC |
|
17,926,885 |
|
17,547,739 |
|
17,870,502 |
|
16,971,628 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
DILUTED |
|
17,926,885 |
|
18,366,097 |
|
17,870,502 |
|
17,832,691 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Summer Infant, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Note that all amounts presented in the table below are in thousands of dollars.
|
|
Unaudited |
|
Unaudited |
| ||||||||
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the nine months ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
|
September |
| ||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(65,429 |
) |
$ |
2,079 |
|
$ |
(64,531 |
) |
$ |
4,163 |
|
Other Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cumulative changes in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
124 |
|
(373 |
) |
(113 |
) |
78 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(65,305 |
) |
$ |
1,706 |
|
$ |
(64,644 |
) |
$ |
4,241 |
|
Summer Infant, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Note that all amounts presented in the table below are in thousands of dollars.
|
|
Unaudited |
| ||||
|
|
For the nine months ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(64,531 |
) |
$ |
4,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets |
|
70,198 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
5,728 |
|
4,646 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
766 |
|
837 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Change in value of interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
|
(209 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities net of effects of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Increase in trade receivables |
|
(4,975 |
) |
(7,016 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Decrease in inventory |
|
1,849 |
|
4,519 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(Increase) decrease in prepaids and other current assets |
|
725 |
|
(773 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
(9,718 |
) |
997 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
42 |
|
7,164 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisitions of property and equipment |
|
(3,806 |
) |
(4,888 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(13,960 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(3,806 |
) |
(18,848 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds upon issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options |
|
417 |
|
2,407 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net borrowings on line of credit and other debt |
|
14,144 |
|
9,984 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
14,561 |
|
12,391 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(113 |
) |
78 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
10,684 |
|
785 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
1,215 |
|
1,138 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
11,899 |
|
$ |
1,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash payments on capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
313 |
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
2,385 |
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
(302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Issuance of common stock in conjunction with acquisition of Born Free |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
9,651 |
|
SUMMER INFANT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(amounts in thousands of dollars except share and per share amounts)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Summer Infant, Inc. (the Company or Summer) are unaudited, but in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. Accordingly, they do not include all information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for complete financial statements. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period. The balance sheet at December 31, 2011 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 29, 2012.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is based on the Companys estimated annualized effective tax rate for the year. The Company does not provide for U.S. tax on certain foreign earnings considered permanently invested.
Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method of accounting. Under the asset and liability method, a deferred tax asset or liability is recognized for estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carry forwards. The measurement of deferred income tax assets is adjusted by a valuation allowance, if necessary, to recognize future tax benefits only to the extent, based on available evidence it is more likely than not such benefits will be realized. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions in interest expense. No interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were accrued at September 30, 2012. The tax years 2009 through 2011 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Our federal tax returns for 2009 have been audited by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The audit is substantially complete as of September 30, 2012, and all audit adjustments have been recorded without significant impact on our results of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net Income or (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings or loss per share for the Company are computed by dividing net income or loss, as applicable, by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive impact of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted shares.
Translation of Foreign Currencies
All assets and liabilities of the Companys foreign affiliates, whose functional currency is not U.S. dollars, are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the quarter and the income and expense accounts of these affiliates have been translated at average rates prevailing during each respective quarter. Resulting translation adjustments are made to a separate component of stockholders equity within accumulated other comprehensive loss. Transaction gains and losses are included in the statement of operations.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance, an entity may present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either case, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. For public companies, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and shall be applied retrospectively. Other than a change in presentation, the implementation of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting guidance for fair value measurement and disclosure. Among other things, the guidance expands the disclosure requirements around fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and requires disclosure of the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but whose fair value must be disclosed. It also clarifies and expands upon existing requirements for measurement of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities as well as instruments classified in shareholders equity. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards if currently adopted would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
2. ACQUISITION OF BORN FREE
On March 24, 2011, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of Born Free Holdings Ltd. (Born Free) pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Stock Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) by and among the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary Summer Infant (USA), Inc., Born Free and the stockholders of Born Free. The aggregate consideration paid by the Company to the Born Free stockholders at closing was $24,567, consisting of $13,960 in cash and approximately $10,607 in shares of the Companys common stock, or 1,510,989 shares based on a price per share of $7.02 (the closing price on the date of acquisition). Under the Purchase Agreement, the Born Free stockholders could have received earn-out payments upon achievement of certain financial targets over the twelve months subsequent to the acquisition up to a maximum amount of $13,000. A portion of the shares issued at closing was deposited in escrow for a period of 18 months as security for any breach of the representations, warranties and covenants of Born Free and the Born Free stockholders contained in the Purchase Agreement. On September 30, 2011 the Company received $1,000 in common stock from the Born Free escrow account due to a preliminary net asset adjustment as defined in the Purchase Agreement. This was accounted for on the balance sheet through an increase in acquired accrued liabilities by $1,000, and increasing treasury stock by $956 and goodwill by $44.
On August 15, 2012, the Company settled all outstanding claims related to the net asset adjustment and earn-out provisions in the Purchase Agreement, resulting in a charge to general and administrative expense of approximately $453. The settlement included finalizing the net asset adjustment in the amount of $1,400. This adjustment also resulted in an increase to treasury stock of $327 reflecting additional shares (130,515) returned to the Company. In addition, there was no payment required under the earn-out provision of the Purchase Agreement. As a result of this final settlement, the Company does not expect any future liability under the net asset adjustment or earn-out provisions under the Purchase Agreement.
The results of operations of Born Free are included in the results of the Company from the date of acquisition forward. Related deal costs were expensed in the 2011 statement of operations.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price for Born Free has been assigned to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. Approximately $16,400 and $11,532 were assigned to certain intangible assets and goodwill, respectively, based on independent valuations received by the Company. In addition, the estimated amount of the contingent earn-out was valued at zero as of December 31, 2011 and September 30, 2012 based on the Companys best estimate of the earn-out computation. The acquisition was recorded as of the closing date, reflecting the assets and liabilities of Born Free, at
their acquisition date fair values. Intangible assets that were identifiable were recognized separately from goodwill which was measured and recognized as the excess of the fair value of Born Free, as a whole, over the net amount of the recognized identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The acquisition accounting was finalized during the fourth quarter of 2011.
Calculation of assignment consideration:
Cash |
|
$ |
13,960 |
|
Stock |
|
9,607 |
(1) | |
|
|
|
| |
Actual Consideration |
|
$ |
23,567 |
|
Assignment of consideration among assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of March 24, 2011:
Trade receivables |
|
$ |
2,226 |
|
Inventory |
|
2,595 |
| |
Property and equipment, net |
|
53 |
| |
Brand name |
|
11,800 |
| |
Customer relationship |
|
4,600 |
| |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
(5,176 |
) | |
Deferred tax liability |
|
(4,063 |
) | |
Goodwill |
|
11,532 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total assigned purchase price |
|
$ |
23,567 |
|
(1) The stock portion of the acquisition consists of 1,369,855 shares at a price per share of $7.02 which reflects the preliminary net asset adjustment taken in September 2011 and the final net asset adjustment in August 2012 explained above.
The estimated pro forma effect on net revenues, earnings, and earnings per share amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, assuming the Born Free transaction had closed on January 1, 2011, are as follows
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
$ |
186,276 |
|
Net Income |
|
N/A |
|
2,989 |
| ||
Earnings per share |
|
$ |
N/A |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
The above amounts in 2011 include all deal related expenses incurred by Born Free plus various non-recurring charges.
3. DEBT
Credit Facility
In August 2010, the Company and its subsidiaries entered into a secured credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each of the financial institutions as a signatory to the agreement. The agreement was subsequently amended on March 24, 2011, November 9, 2011, May 11, 2012 and, as described below, on November 7, 2012 (as amended, the Loan Agreement). The Loan Agreement provides for an $80,000 working capital revolving credit facility. The amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility are payable in full upon maturity of the credit facility on December 31, 2013. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of
the assets of the Company. The amount outstanding on the credit facility at September 30, 2012 was $76,500; the total borrowing capacity at September 30, 2012 was approximately $80,000.
As of September 30, 2012, the Company was not in compliance with the consolidated EBITDA and the consolidated leverage ratio covenants under the terms of the Loan Agreement as of that date. On November 7, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment (the Fourth Amendment) that waived these covenant defaults, revised the Companys financial covenants, added additional applicable rate margin spread pricing tiers and added a payment in kind (PIK) interest rate of 200 basis points on any outstanding loan balance effective October 1, 2012. See Note 10 for a description of the Fourth Amendment.
The Companys ability to borrow under the Loan Agreement is subject to its ongoing compliance with certain financial covenants, as revised in the Fourth Amendment, including that (a) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain and earn on a consolidated basis as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Loan Agreement) for the twelve month period ending on such date equal to or greater than (i) $12,500 beginning with the twelve month period ending September 30, 2012, (ii) $10,500 for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2012, (iii) $10,000 for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2013, (iv) $12,500 for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2013, and (v) $17,000 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2013 and thereafter; (b) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain a ratio of consolidated total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (the consolidated leverage ratio) of not greater than 6.25:1.00 beginning with the twelve month period ending September 30, 2012, of not greater than 6.75:1.00 for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2012, of not greater than 7.00:1.00 for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2013, of not greater than 6.00:1.00 for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2013, and of not greater than 4.00:1.00 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2013, and thereafter; and (c) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain a fixed charge ratio of at least 1.50 to 1.00 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2012, 1.10:1.00 for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2012, 1.00:1.00 for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2013, 1.25:1.00 for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2013, and 1.50:1.00 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2013 and thereafter. The Company was required to pay a fee in the amount of $200 in connection with the Fourth Amendment.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt related to this credit facility are as follows:
Year ending December 31: |
2012 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
2013 |
|
76,500 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,500 |
|
As of September 30, 2012, the Loan Agreement allows the Company to borrow under the credit facility at LIBOR or at a base rate, plus applicable margins based on the funded debt to EBITDA leverage ratio for the most recent twelve month rolling quarter end. Applicable margins at September 30, 2012 varied between a 200 to 375 basis point spread over LIBOR and between a zero to 175 basis point spread on base rate loans. The Company has also entered into various interest rate swap agreements which effectively fix the interest rates on a portion of the outstanding debt, of which, the last agreement matured on June 7, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, the interest rate on these credit facility dates averaged 4.09%. In addition, the credit facility has an unused line fee based on the unused amount of the credit facility equal to 25 basis points. Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, as further described in Note 10, beginning October 1, 2012, the applicable margins no longer vary depending upon the funded debt to EBITDA leverage ratio and are instead fixed at 4.75% for Eurodollar or BBA LIBOR rate loans and L/C fees and 2.75% for base rate loans through March 31, 2013, increasing by 1.00% each fiscal quarter thereafter. In addition, beginning on October 1, 2012, loans will begin bearing additional interest of 2.00% per annum not paid in cash but payable in kind by adding such accrued interest to the outstanding principal of the loans, or PIK interest.
The Loan Agreement also contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision and a change of control provision. In the event of a default, all of the obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Loan Agreement may be declared immediately due and payable. For certain events of default relating to insolvency and receivership, all outstanding obligations become due and payable. Accordingly, as a result of the
failure to meet any of these financial covenants contained in the Fourth Amendment or any other covenants under the Loan Agreement, the lenders may declare an event of default, which would have a material adverse affect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. If access to our credit facility is limited or terminated liquidity would be constrained, affecting the Companys operations and growth prospects, and the Company would need to seek additional equity or debt financing. There is no assurance that such alternative financing would be available on acceptable terms or at all. Furthermore, any equity financing may result in dilution to existing stockholders and any debt financing may include restrictive covenants that could impede the Companys ability to effectively operate and grow its business in the future.
4. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES IMPAIRMENT
The components of goodwill and intangibles as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are set forth in the schedule below:
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
Impairment |
|
Amortization |
|
September 30, |
| ||||
Goodwill |
|
$ |
61,908 |
|
$ |
61,908 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Intangibles, indefinite-lived |
|
22,546 |
|
8,290 |
|
|
|
14,255 |
| ||||
Intangibles, definite-lived |
|
7,499 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
6,674 |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
91,953 |
|
$ |
70,198 |
|
$ |
825 |
|
$ |
20,929 |
|
The Company reviews goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment by applying a fair-value based test annually in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances warrant, in accordance with ASC 350, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (ASC 350). Potential impairment of indefinite-lived intangibles is measured by comparing the estimated fair value to its carrying value. Potential goodwill impairment is then measured based upon a two-step process. In the first step, the Company compares the fair value of its single reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill using a discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation method. Future cash flows are discounted based on a market comparable weighted average cost of capital rate, adjusted for market and other risks where appropriate. If the fair value of the single reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, the goodwill is considered not impaired, thus rendering unnecessary the second step in impairment testing. If the fair value of the single reporting unit is less than the carrying value, a second step is performed in which the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill is compared to the carrying value of the goodwill. The implied fair value of the goodwill is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the single reporting unit and the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the single reporting unit. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value, the difference is recognized as an impairment charge.
Due to the sustained decrease in our results of operations (below forecasts) and stock price during the third quarter of 2012, we undertook an interim goodwill and intangible asset impairment analysis and engaged a third party to assist management in valuing goodwill and other intangible assets recorded on our balance sheet.
As a result of its analysis and the valuation study, management first determined that the estimated fair value of certain indefinite lived intangibles were lower than carrying value and recorded a write-down summarized above.
The Step I test for goodwill resulted in the determination that the carrying value of the goodwill exceeded its fair value thus requiring the Company to measure the amount of any goodwill impairment by performing the second step of the impairment test. The second step (defined as Step II) of the goodwill impairment test, used to measure the amount of impairment loss, compared the implied fair value of the single reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the Companys goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The loss recognized cannot exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to its assets and liabilities is the implied amount of goodwill. The Company estimates the fair value of several tangible and intangible assets during the process that are valued during this process. Intangible assets included trade names, customer relationships and patents. For intangible assets, the Company selected an income approach to value trade names, customer relationships and patents. The customer relationships were valued using a discounted cash flow methodology.
The trade names and patents were valued using a relief from royalty method.
As a result of its analysis and the valuation study discussed above, management also determined the implied fair value of our goodwill was lower than its respective carrying value, and the Company recorded an estimated aggregate non-cash impairment charge of $70,198 in the three months ended September 30, 2012. The non-cash impairment charge consisted of a write down of goodwill of $61,908 and a write down of a portion of intangible assets of $8,290. The Company is finalizing its review of the valuation studies but does not expect material changes to the impairment charge.
5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company adopted the FASB standard regarding fair value, the framework of which determines the fair value of its financial instruments, based on a three-level valuation hierarchy based upon observable and non-observable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Companys market assumptions. Preference is given to observable inputs. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
Level 1Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
The Company maintains policies and procedures to value instruments using the best and most relevant data available. In addition, the Company utilizes risk management resources that review valuation, including independent price validation.
The Companys interest rate swaps are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Prior to June 2012, the Company recognized the fair value of interest rate swaps using Level 2 inputs. (See Note 6)
The Companys financial instruments that are not required to record at fair value on a recurring basis include: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, capital lease obligations, and short term and long term debt. Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value based on their short term nature. The fair value of the Companys capital lease obligations and short term and long term debt approximates fair value based on current rates available, which are level 2 inputs.
6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The Company is required under its Loan Agreement, to mitigate fluctuations in interest rates through the use of derivatives. As a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivatives for speculative purposes.
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its borrowing activities. The Companys long-term debt is a variable rate instrument. The Company currently does not hold any interest rate swap contracts at September 30, 2012. The one contract previously held by the Company matured on June 7, 2012. Based on the maturity date of the Companys current credit agreement of December 31, 2013, the Company is not required to enter into another interest rate swap contract.
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Company is a party to routine litigation and administrative complaints incidental to its business. Management does not believe that the resolution of any or all of such routine litigation and administrative complaints is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
8. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has granted stock-based awards under its 2006 Performance Equity Plan (2006 Plan). Under the 2006 Plan, awards may be granted to participants in the form of Non-Qualified Stock Options, Incentive Stock Options, Restricted Stock, Deferred Stock, Stock Reload Options and other stock-based awards. Subject to the provisions of the 2006 Plan, awards may be granted to employees, officers, directors, advisors and consultants who are deemed to have rendered or are able to render significant services to the Company and who are deemed to have contributed or to have the potential to contribute to the Companys success. The Company has issued both stock options and restricted shares to employees and board members.
In April 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved and recommended to the Companys Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, the adoption of the Companys 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (The 2012 Plan), subject to the approval of the Companys stockholders. The Companys stockholders approved the 2012 Plan on June 14, 2012. The purpose of the 2012 Plan is to assist the Company and its subsidiaries and other designated affiliates which we refer to as related entities, in attracting, motivating, retaining and rewarding high quality executives and other employees, officers, directors, consultants, and other persons who provide services to the Company or its related entities. The persons eligible to receive awards under the 2012 Plan are the officers, directors, employees, consultants and other persons who provide services to the Company or any related entity. The types of awards that may be made under the 2012 Plan include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, bonus shares, non-employee director awards, awards in lieu of obligations, performance-based awards and other stock-based awards.
Under the 2012 Plan, the total number of shares of the Companys common stock reserved and available for delivery under the 2012 Plan at any time during the term of the 2012 Plan shall be 500,000, subject to adjustment as provided for in the 2012 Plan. As of September 30, 2012, no awards have been made pursuant to the 2012 Plan. From time to time, the Company may also make stock-based awards outside its 2006 Plan or 2012 Plan.
Share-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $766 and $837, respectively. As of September 30, 2012, there were 1,247,020 stock options outstanding and 170,013 unvested restricted shares outstanding.
During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company granted stock options under the 2006 Plan. The key assumptions used in determining the valuation included:
· |
|
Expected life |
|
- |
|
6 years |
|
· |
|
Volatility |
|
- |
|
55 |
% |
· |
|
Discount rate |
|
- |
|
1.71 |
% |
In July 2012, a newly-appointed member of the Companys Board of Directors received a restricted stock grant of 9,146 shares of the Companys common stock under the 2006 Plan equal in value to approximately $30 and vesting in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The grant was made pursuant to the Board of Directors compensation program previously approved by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors.
In September 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors approved the grant of equity awards to an executive officer outside the 2006 Plan and 2012 Plan, consisting of (i) an option to purchase 40,000 shares of the Companys common stock and (ii) a restricted stock grant of 20,000 shares of the Companys common stock equal in value to approximately $51, with each such equity award vesting in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
In September 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors approved the grant of an option to purchase 2,000 shares of the Companys common stock under the 2006 Plan to an eligible employee that vests in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
9. WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
Basic and diluted earnings or loss per share (EPS) is based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. The Company does not include the anti-dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, including stock options, in computing net income (loss) per diluted common share. The computation per diluted common share for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2012 excluded all potentially dilutive instruments from the computation of diluted EPS since the effect would be anti-dilutive because of the net loss. The computation per diluted common share for the three-month period ended September 30, 2012 and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2012, excluded 714,118 and 686,118 stock options outstanding, respectively. In the same periods of the prior year 2011, there was no anti-dilutive effect on any outstanding stock options; therefore no other options had to be excluded in the earning per share calculation for those periods.
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 7, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment (the Fourth Amendment) to its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of America and the other lenders signatory thereto (the Loan Agreement). The Amendment amended the Loan Agreement to provide that the applicable interest rate margin for loans under the Loan Agreement for period October 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013 will be at fixed rate of 4.75% for Eurodollar or BBA LIBOR rate loans and L/C fees and 2.75% for base rate loans, thereafter each rate increasing by 1.00% in each fiscal quarter, and that, beginning October 1, 2012, loans under the Loan Agreement will bear additional interest of 2.00% per annum not paid in cash but payable in kind by adding such accrued interest to the outstanding principal of the loans, or PIK interest. PIK interest is due and payable on the earliest of (i) the maturity date of the loans, (ii) the date all loans are paid in full and all loan commitments are terminated, and (iii) the date of acceleration of loans upon an event of default, provided that if all obligations under the Loan Agreement are paid in full and all commitments terminated on or prior to March 31, 2013, the Lender will forgive 50% of the accrued and unpaid PIK interest.
Under the Fourth Amendment, the Company is subject to ongoing compliance with certain financial covenants, including that (i) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain and earn on a consolidated basis as of the last day of each fiscal quarter a specified consolidated EBITDA amount (as defined in the Loan Agreement) for the 12-month period ending on the last day of each fiscal quarter beginning September 30, 2012; (ii) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain a certain ratio of consolidated total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA; and (iii) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain a minimum fixed charge ratio.
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking information and statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These include statements regarding our expectations, intentions, or strategies regarding future matters. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof. It is important to note that our actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our ability to grow our business through developing new products, obtaining new customers, increasing our sales territory, and making strategic acquisitions, and our anticipated cash flow for the next 12 months. These statements are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include the Companys ability to integrate acquired businesses, the concentration of the Companys business with retail customers; the ability of the Company to compete in the industry; the Companys dependence on key personnel; the Companys reliance on foreign suppliers; the Companys ability to meet its debt covenants; and other risks as detailed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Form 10-Q. All these matters are difficult or impossible to predict accurately, many of which may be beyond our control. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q will prove to be accurate.
The information contained in this section has been derived from the Companys consolidated financial statements and should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this filing and with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. All dollar amounts in the following section are in thousands of U.S. dollars.
The following discussion is intended to assist in the assessment of significant changes and trends related to the results of operations and financial condition of Summer Infant, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein.
Summary of critical accounting policies and estimates
The Companys critical accounting policies are disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There have been no material changes to these policies during the first nine months of 2012. The policies noted below are presented to assist in understanding the consolidated financial statements appearing in this report. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Management of the Company is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The accounting policies described below are those that management considers critical in preparing the Companys financial statements. Some of these policies include significant estimates made by management using information available at the time the estimates were made. The Companys significant accounting estimates have historically been and are expected to remain reasonably accurate, but actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Sales
Our sales are primarily derived from the sale of juvenile health, safety and wellness products and are recognized upon transfer of title of product to our customers. Our products are marketed through several distribution channels including mass merchant retailers, independent specialty retailers, on-line retailers and direct to consumers. There are not significant variations in seasonal demand for our products.
Over 90% of sales are currently made to customers in North America, with remaining sales primarily made to customers in the United Kingdom. Sales are made utilizing standard credit terms of 30 to 60 days. We generally accept returns only for defective merchandise.
Cost of goods sold and other expenses
Our products are manufactured by third parties, principally located in Asia, with approximately 90% of the manufactured cost dollar value occurring in that region. The majority of the balance of our products are manufactured in the United States. Cost of goods sold primarily represents purchases of finished products from these third party manufacturers. The remainder of our cost of goods sold includes duties on certain imported items, freight-in from suppliers and miscellaneous charges from contract manufacturers. Substantially all of our purchases are made in US dollars; therefore, most of this activity is not subject to currency fluctuations. If our suppliers experience increased raw materials, labor or other costs and pass along such cost increases through higher prices for finished goods, our costs of sales would increase, and to the extent we are unable to pass such price increases along to our customers, our gross margins would decrease, and therefore, adversely affect our profitability.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of payroll, insurance, professional fees, royalties, freight out to customers, warehouse operations costs, product development costs, advertising and marketing expenses (including co-op advertising allowances as negotiated with certain customers), stock based compensation and sales commissions. Several of these items fluctuate with volume based on sales to particular customers and or sales of particular products.
Inventory Valuation
Inventory is comprised of finished goods and is stated at the lower of cost, inclusive of freight and duty, or market (net realizable value) using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Our warehousing costs are charged to
expense as incurred. We regularly review slow-moving and excess inventory and write-down inventories as appropriate. Management uses estimates to record write-downs based on its review of inventory by product category, including length of time on hand and estimates of future orders for each product. Changes in consumer preferences, as well as demand for products, customer buying patterns and inventory management could impact the inventory valuation.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. An asset is considered to be impaired when its carrying amount exceeds the sum of the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Long-lived assets include property and equipment. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is charged by the Company to current operations. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2012 and each of the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, no such impairment existed.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with accounting guidance that requires that goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives and not subject to amortization be tested at least annually for impairment. We evaluate goodwill, at a minimum, on an annual basis and whenever events and changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment of goodwill is tested by comparing the carrying value, including goodwill, to the Companys fair value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, a second step is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. Under this second step, the implied goodwill value is determined, in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, to assess the level of goodwill impairment, if any. We determine the Companys fair value using the income, or discounted cash flows, approach. (DCF model) and verify the reasonableness of such fair value calculations using the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies data. The completion of the DCF model requires that we make a number of significant assumptions to produce an estimate of future cash flows. These assumptions include projections of future revenue, costs and working capital changes. In addition, we make assumptions about the estimated cost of capital and other relevant variables, as required, in estimating fair value. The projections that we use in our DCF model are updated annually and will change over time based on the historical performance and changing business conditions. The determination of whether goodwill is impaired involves a significant level of judgment in these assumptions, and changes in our business strategy, government regulations, or economic or market conditions, or a decline in our stock price could significantly impact these judgments. As of December 31, 2011, the estimated fair value of the Company exceeded the carrying value of our reporting unit. Management evaluates the remaining useful life of any intangible asset that is not being amortized each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. If an intangible asset that is not being amortized is subsequently determined to have a finite useful life, it is amortized prospectively over its estimated remaining useful life. As described below and in Note 4 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report, during our quarterly review process we determined that goodwill and certain other intangible assets were impaired as of September 30, 2012.
Company Overview
We are a designer, marketer, and distributor of branded durable juvenile health, safety and wellness products (for ages 0-3 years) that are sold principally to large North American and United Kingdom retailers. We currently sell and distribute products in various product categories including nursery audio/video monitors, safety gates, durable bath products, bed rails, nursery products, booster and potty seats, bouncers, travel accessories, high chairs, swings, feeding products, car seats, and nursery furniture. Our business has grown organically in all our markets. Our revenue is driven by our ability to design and market desirable products, identify business opportunities and secure new and renew existing distribution channels. Our income from operations is derived from our ability to generate revenue and collect cash in excess of labor and other cost of providing our product and selling, general and administrative costs.
Our strategy is to grow our sales through a variety of methods, including:
· increased product penetration (more products at each store);
· increased store penetration (more stores within each retail customer);
· new products (at existing and new customers);
· new mass merchant retail customers;
· new distribution channels (food and drug chains, price clubs, home centers, and web-based retailers);
· new geographies (international expansion);
· new product categories; and
· acquisitions.
We have has been able to grow our annual revenues historically through a combination of all of the above factors. Each year we have been able to expand the number of products in our main distribution channel, mass merchant retailers, and have also added new customers each year.
For 2012 and beyond, our growth strategy will be to continue to develop and sell new products to our existing customer base, sell new and existing products to new customers (or expand relationships with existing customers), and to expand in the United Kingdom and in other geographic regions (including Japan, Mexico and Australia).
In addition, in the past we have pursued and we expect to continue to pursue potential acquisition candidates to obtain new innovative products, acquire product categories in which we currently do not participate, gain shelf space by adding retail customers or expand distribution with the addition of new sales territories.
As we continue to grow through internal initiatives and potential future acquisitions, we will incur additional expenses, particularly in the areas of sales and product development. To grow sales, we will likely hire additional sales personnel to service new geographic territories, focus existing resources on specific parts of the United States market and retain product line specialists to drive sales of new and existing products in specific areas in which we believe we can readily increase sales. Product development expenses are expected to increase as we develop new products in existing and new categories. As a result of our acquisition strategy, we will face various challenges such as the integration of the acquired companies product lines, employees, marketing requirements and information systems. Ongoing infrastructure investment may be required to support realized growth, including expenditures with respect to upgraded and expanded information systems and enhancing the Companys management team.
Recent Developments
Amendment to Credit Facility
As of September 30, 2012, the Company was not in compliance with the consolidated EBITDA, and the Consolidated Leverage Ratio Covenants under the terms of the Loan Agreement as of that date. On November 7, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment (the Fourth Amendment) that waived these covenant defaults, revised the Companys financial covenants, added additional applicable rate margin spread pricing tiers and effective October 1, 2012, added a payment in kind (PIK) interest rate of 200 basis points, a portion of which is payable under certain conditions.
Direct Import Programs
We have begun to move a portion of our business with certain customers to a direct import program. With a direct import program, product is shipped FOB directly to the customer from the supplier at the time of shipment and we are able to receive payment from the customer prior to paying the supplier, thereby improving our cash flow. Currently, approximately 2% of our sales are made under a direct import program and we continue to work with key customers to increase participation in direct import programs.
Goodwill and Intangible Asset Impairment
Due to the sustained decrease in our results of operations (below forecasts) and stock price during the third quarter of 2012, we undertook an interim goodwill and intangible asset impairment analysis and engaged a third party to assist management in valuing goodwill and other intangible assets recorded on our balance sheet. As a result, management determined that the estimated fair value of certain indefinite lived intangibles and implied fair value of our goodwill were lower than their respective carrying value, and the Company recorded an estimated aggregate non-cash impairment charge of $70,198 in the third quarter of 2012. The non-cash impairment charge consisted of a write down of goodwill of $61,908 and a write down of a portion of intangible assets of $8,290. These charges affected our financial condition and results of operation for the third quarter ended September 30, 2012; however, they have no impact on our day-to-day operations or liquidity and will not result in any future cash expenditures. We are finalizing our review of the valuation studies but do not expect any material changes to the impairment charge.
Outlook
Our business, financial condition and results of operations have and may continue to be affected by various economic factors. Although other factors will likely impact us, including some we do not foresee and those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, we believe our performance in 2012 will continue to be affected by the following:
· Economic Climate. Periods of global economic uncertainty, such as the recession experienced in 2008 and much of 2009, as well as recent market disruptions, can lead to reduced consumer and business spending. The current economic climate continues to affect our business in direct and indirect ways, including reduced consumer demand for our products, tighter inventory management by retailers, reduced profit margins due to pricing pressures from mass merchant retailers and a sales mix favoring lower margin products. In addition, reduced access to credit has and may continue to adversely affect consumers who desire to purchase our products from retailers and the ability of our own customers to pay us.
· Retail Market Conditions. Our industry is very competitive, with increasing pressure from mass merchant retailers on pricing in reaction to perceived lack of consumer confidence. These customers continue to seek favorable pricing and increased promotional activity from us and we expect this trend will continue through the end of 2012 and into 2013. We continue to seek to reduce pressure on gross margins through a variety of methods, including reducing manufacturing costs and locating lower-cost sources of supply. We have also begun raising prices on certain products and phasing out lower margin products. However, we may not be able to increase prices or decline requests for mark-downs and/other other allowances from some of our larger, retail customers due to market and competitive factors.
· Debt Financing. In November 2012, we amended our existing credit facility which modified financial covenants under that agreement. The Companys ability to borrow under the Loan Agreement is subject to its ongoing compliance with these modified financial covenants. As of September 30, 2012, we had an outstanding principal balance of approximately $76.5 million under the agreement. Because part of our cash flow must go to interest payments on our existing indebtedness, the amount of available cash for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes may be limited.
Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income
For the Three and Nine Months Ending September 30, 2012 and 2011
|
|
For the three |
|
For the nine months |
| ||||||||
|
|
months ended |
|
ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||||||
|
|
30-Sep-12 |
|
30-Sep-11 |
|
30-Sep-12 |
|
30-Sep-11 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Sales |
|
$ |
63,984 |
|
$ |
63,342 |
|
$ |
188,714 |
|
$ |
182,803 |
|
Cost of Goods Sold |
|
44,359 |
|
41,347 |
|
127,198 |
|
120,895 |
| ||||
Gross Profit |
|
19,625 |
|
21,995 |
|
61,516 |
|
61,908 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
|
18,178 |
|
16,976 |
|
53,447 |
|
49,794 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
2,050 |
|
1,562 |
|
5,728 |
|
4,646 |
| ||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangibles |
|
70,198 |
|
|
|
70,198 |
|
|
| ||||
Net operating income (loss) |
|
(70,801 |
) |
3,457 |
|
(67,857 |
) |
7,468 |
| ||||
Interest expense, net |
|
(938 |
) |
(774 |
) |
(2,557 |
) |
(2,096 |
) | ||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
|
(71,739 |
) |
2,683 |
|
(70,414 |
) |
5,372 |
| ||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
(6,310 |
) |
604 |
|
(5,883 |
) |
1,209 |
| ||||
Net Income (loss) |
|
$ |
(65,429 |
) |
$ |
(2,079 |
) |
$ |
(64,531 |
) |
$ |
4,163 |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with three months ended September 30, 2011
Net sales increased by 1.0% from approximately $63,342 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 to approximately $63,984 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The sales increase was primarily attributable to higher sales in the furniture, nursery and play categories partially offset by lower sales in the gear product category.
Gross profit decreased by $2,370 to approximately $19,625 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from approximately $21,995 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in gross profit in the third quarter ended September 30, 2012 resulted from an unfavorable product mix caused primarily by higher sales in the lower margin furniture category, a decline in sales in the higher margin gear category and a one-time $530 charge to cost of goods sold to write off obsolete inventory acquired from Born Free., Ltd. In addition, markdown and returned goods allowances were higher by $1,558 in the three months ended September 30, 2012 as compared with the same period in the prior year.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation) increased by 8.3% from approximately $16,641 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 to approximately $18,030 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase of $1,389 is mainly comprised of an increase in selling expense related to higher promotional costs in customer cooperative advertising, higher out bound freight expense and increased royalty payments under licensing agreements. General and administrative expense declined in the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in the prior year by approximately $800 which is net of a one time non-cash charge of $453. The reduction in general and administrative expense is the result of various overhead cost reduction efforts initiated by the Company at the end of the second quarter of this year. The $453 charge is the result of the Company finalizing the net asset adjustment as defined in the Purchase Agreement relating to the acquisition of Born Free. We do not expect any future charges will be required to the net asset adjustment or potential earn-out payments in connection with the Born Free acquisition.
Interest expense increased to approximately $938 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from approximately $774 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, primarily as a result of higher interest costs and increased borrowings required to fund working capital needs.
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with nine months ended September 30, 2011
Net sales increased by 3.2% from approximately $182,803 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to approximately $188,714 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The sales increase was primarily attributable to higher sales in the furniture, nursery, feeding and safety categories offset, in part, by lower sales in the monitor and gear categories in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared with the same period in the prior year.
Gross profit decreased by $392 from approximately $61,908 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to approximately $61,516 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decline in gross profit in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 can be attributed to an unfavorable product mix, in particular, caused by an increase in lower margin sales in the furniture category, a decrease in sales in the higher margin monitor category and a one-time $530 adjustment to cost of goods sold pertaining to the write off of obsolete inventory acquired from Born Free. In addition, markdown and returned goods allowances were higher by $3,480 in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation) increased by about 7.6% from approximately $48,957 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to approximately $52,680 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase is mainly the result of higher promotional costs related to customer cooperative advertising and placement of consumer ads, higher royalty payments under licensing agreements and an increase in other variable selling costs associated with the increase in sales. Excluding the one-time charge of $453 related to the Born Free net asset adjustment, general and administrative expense was slightly lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in the prior year as we begin to benefit from overhead cost reductions initiated at the end of the second quarter of 2012.
Interest expense increased from approximately $2,096 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to approximately $2,557 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily as a result of higher interest costs and increased borrowings required to fund working capital needs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Currently, our principal sources of liquidity are generated from cash flow from operations and borrowings from availability under our bank credit facility.
Our sales have increased significantly over the past several years. This sales growth has led to a substantial increase in working capital requirements, specifically trade receivables and inventory. The typical cash flow cycle is as follows:
· Inventory is purchased to meet expected demand plus a safety stock. Because the majority of our vendors are based in Asia, inventory takes from four to six weeks to arrive from Asia to the various distribution points we maintain in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Payment terms for these vendors are approximately 30-60 days from the date the product ships from Asia, therefore, we are generally paying for the product a short time after it is physically received in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. The increased sales we have experienced result in the requirement for increased levels of inventory purchases, and therefore an increase in the amount of cash required to fund our inventory level. During the third quarter, we were successful in negotiating extended terms with our supplier base thereby improving cash flow and our working capital position.
· Sales to customers generally have payment terms of 60 days. The increased sales have resulted in an increase in the level of accounts receivable, and therefore have increased the amount of cash required to fund working capital. During the third quarter of 2012, we were also able to negotiate improved payment terms with customers thereby improving our working capital position.
The majority of our capital expenditures are for tools related to new product introductions. We receive indications from retailers generally around the middle of each year related to product orders they will be taking for the upcoming year. Based on these indications, we will then place tooling capital orders required to build the products. In most cases, the payments for the tools are amortized over a three to four month period.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $42 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $7,164 at September 30, 2011. In 2012, this decline in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a net loss of $64,531 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2012, an increase in trade receivables of $4,975 and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $9,718. In 2011, net cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of net income earned in the amount of $4,163 and a decrease in inventory of $4,519.
Net cash used in investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $3,806 compared to $18,848 at September 30, 2011. The significant decrease is due to the fact that the nine months ended September 30, 2011 reflects the recording of the acquisition of Born Free of $13,960 and lower purchases of property, plant and equipment of approximately $1,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with the same period in the prior year.
Net cash provided by financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $14,561 compared to $12,391 at September 30, 2011. The increase in cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 is attributable to higher borrowings of approximately $4,160 offset by fewer stock options being exercised of approximately $1,990.
Based on the above factors, the net cash increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $10,684, resulting in a cash balance of $11,899 at September 30, 2012.
We have traditionally funded our increased working capital needs utilizing operating cash flow and our credit facility as recently amended, as further described below. Based on current assumptions regarding the timing of expenditures and forecasted cash flow, our operating cash flow combined with borrowings under our credit facility are expected to be sufficient to fund our operations and capital requirements for at least the next 12 months.
However, any significant deviation in actual results from our expected results of operations, any significant deviation in the timing of material expenditures from current estimates, any significant business or product acquisitions, or other significant unanticipated expenses could result in our not meeting our financial covenants under the terms of our recently amended credit facility and the lenders could declare a default, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If access to our credit facility is limited or terminated, our liquidity would be constrained affecting our operations and growth prospects, and we would need to seek additional equity or debt financing. There is no assurance that such financing would be available on acceptable terms or at all. Furthermore, any equity financing may result in dilution to existing stockholders and any debt financing may include restrictive covenants that could impede our ability to effectively operate and grow our business in the future.
In addition, based on the scheduled credit facility maturity date of December 31, 2013, absent a further amendment or restructuring of the debt, all obligations under the credit facility will need to be reclassified to short-term debt on our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. As a result, prior to the issuance of the annual financial statements we intend to replace the facility with alternative bank financing or other equity or debt financing. While we are currently in the process of seeking financing to replace the existing credit facility, there can be no guarantee that we will obtain such financing on acceptable terms, within the time period required, and any such terms may be less favorable to the Company. As noted above, any financing may also include an equity financing, which could result in dilution to our existing stockholders. If we are unsuccessful at obtaining financing to replace our existing credit facility or an extension of the maturity date of our existing facility, our ability to continue as a going concern may be adversely affected by the reclassification of our long-term debt to short-term debt and subsequent maturity of our existing credit facility.
Credit Facility
In August 2010, the Company and its subsidiaries entered into a secured credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, and each of the financial institutions as a signatory to the agreement. The agreement was subsequently amended on March 24, 2011, November 9, 2011, May 11, 2012 and, as described below, on November 7, 2012 (as amended, the Loan Agreement). The Loan Agreement provides for an $80,000 working capital revolving credit facility. The amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility are payable in full upon maturity of the credit facility on December 31, 2013. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The amount outstanding on the credit facility at September 30, 2012 was $76,500; the total borrowing capacity at September 30, 2012 was approximately $80,000.
As of September 30, 2012, the Company was not in compliance with the consolidated EBITDA and the consolidated leverage ratio covenants under the terms of the Loan Agreement as of that date. On November 7, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment (the Fourth Amendment) that waived these covenant defaults, revised the Companys financial covenants, added additional applicable rate margin spread pricing tiers and added a payment in kind (PIK) interest rate of 200 basis points on any outstanding loan balance effective October 1, 2012, as further described in Note 10 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this report.
The Companys ability to borrow under the Loan Agreement is subject to its ongoing compliance with certain financial covenants, as revised in the Fourth Amendment, including that (a) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain and earn on a consolidated basis as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Loan Agreement) for the twelve month period ending on such date equal to or greater than (i) $12,500 beginning with the twelve month period ending September 30, 2012,(ii) $10,500 for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2012, (iii) $10,000 for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2013, (iv) $12,500 for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2013, and (v) $17,000 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2013 and thereafter; (b) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain a ratio of consolidated total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (the consolidated leverage ratio) of not greater than 6.25:1.00 beginning with the twelve month period ending September 30, 2012, of not greater than 6.75:1.00 for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2012, of not greater than 7.00:1.0 for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2013, of not greater than 6.00:1.0 for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2013, and of not greater than 4.00:1.00 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2013, and thereafter; and (c) the Company and its subsidiaries maintain a fixed charge ratio of at least 1.50 to 1.00 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2012, 1.10:1.00 for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2012, 1.00:1.00 for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2013, 1.25:1.00 for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2013, and 1.50:1.00 for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2013 and thereafter. The Company was required to pay a fee in the amount of $200 in connection with the Fourth Amendment.
Consolidated EBITDA for purposes of the Loan Agreement means for any period, for the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, an amount equal to consolidated net income (excluding extraordinary gains and extraordinary losses) for such period plus (1) the following to the extent deducted in calculating consolidated net income: (A) consolidated interest charges for such period, (B) the provision for federal, state, local and foreign income taxes payable by the Company and its subsidiaries for such period, (C) depreciation and amortization expense, (D) permitted add-backs, if any, (E) non-cash stock option expense and (F) other non-recurring expenses of the Company and its subsidiaries reducing net income in the relevant period and consented to in writing by the Bank, less (2) the following to the extent included in calculating consolidated net income: (A) federal, state, local and foreign income tax credits of the Company and its subsidiaries for such period and (B) all non-cash items increasing consolidated net income for such period.
Aggregate maturities of long term debt related to this note are as follows:
Year ending December 31: |
2012 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
2013 |
|
76,500 |
| |
|
Total |
|
$ |
76,500 |
|
As of September 30, 2012, the Loan Agreement allows the Company to borrow under the credit facility at LIBOR or at a base rate, plus applicable margins based on the funded debt to EBITDA leverage ratio for the most recent twelve month rolling quarter end. Applicable margins at September 30, 2012 varied between a 200 to 375 basis point spread over LIBOR and between a zero to 175 basis point spread on base rate loans. The Company has also entered into various interest rate swap agreements which effectively fix the interest rates on a portion of the outstanding debt, of which, the last agreement matured on June 7, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, the interest rate on these credit facility dates averaged 4.09%. In addition, the credit facility has an unused line fee based on the unused amount of the credit facility equal to 25 basis points. Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, as further described in Note 10, beginning October 1, 2012, the applicable margins no longer vary depending upon the funded debt to EBITDA leverage ratio and are instead fixed at 4.75% for Eurodollar or BBA LIBOR rate loans and L/C fees and 2.75% for base rate loans through March 31, 2013, increasing by 1.00% each fiscal quarter thereafter. In addition, beginning on October 1, 2012, loans will begin bearing additional interest of 2.00% per annum not paid in cash but payable in kind by adding such accrued interest to the outstanding principal of the loans, or PIK interest.
The Loan Agreement also contains customary events of default, including a cross default provision and a change of control provision. In the event of a default, all of the obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Loan Agreement may be declared immediately due and payable. For certain events of default relating to insolvency and receivership, all outstanding obligations become due and payable. Accordingly, as a result of the failure to meet any of the financial or other covenants under the Loan Agreement, the lenders may declare an event of default, which would have a material adverse affect on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. If access to our credit facility is limited or terminated, liquidity would be constrained, affecting the Companys operations and growth prospects, and the Company would need to seek additional equity or debt financing. There is no assurance that such alternative financing would be available on acceptable terms or at all. Furthermore, any equity financing may result in dilution to existing stockholders and any debt financing may include restrictive covenants that could impede the Companys ability to effectively operate and grow its business in the future.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not required.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of September 30, 2012. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on this evaluation, that our controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2012.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We are not aware of any such proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I., Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as set forth below:
Deviations from expected results of operations and expected cash requirements could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations
Any significant deviation in actual results from our expected results of operations, any significant deviation in the timing of material expenditures from current estimates, any significant business or product acquisitions, or other significant unanticipated expenses could result in our not meeting our financial covenants under the terms of our recently amended credit facility and the lenders could declare a default, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If actual events, circumstances, outcomes and amounts differ from judgments, assumptions and estimates made or used in determining the amount of certain assets (including the amount of recoverability of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, valuation allowances for receivables, inventories and deferred income tax assets), liabilities (including accruals for income taxes and liabilities) and or other items reflected in our consolidated financial statements, it could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. If access to our credit facility is limited or terminated, our liquidity would be constrained, affecting our operations and growth prospects, and we would need to seek additional equity or debt financing. There is no assurance that such financing would be available on acceptable terms or at all. Furthermore, any equity financing may result in dilution to existing stockholders and any debt financing may include restrictive covenants that could impede our ability to effectively operate and grow our business in the future.
We anticipate that we will be required to restructure our indebtedness.
Based on the scheduled credit facility maturity date of December 31, 2013, absent a further amendment or restructuring of the debt, all obligations under the credit facility will need to be reclassified to short-term debt on our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. As a result, prior to the issuance of these financial statements we intend to replace the facility with alternative bank financing or other equity or debt financing. While we are currently in the process of seeking financing to replace the existing credit facility, there can be no guarantee that we will obtain such financing on acceptable terms, within the time period required, and any such terms may be less favorable to the Company. As noted above, any financing may also include an equity financing, which could result in dilution to our existing stockholders. If we are unsuccessful at obtaining financing to replace our existing credit facility or an extension of the maturity date of our existing facility, our ability to continue as a going concern may be adversely affected by the reclassification of our long-term debt to short-term debt and maturity of our existing credit facility.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Funds.
None.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
None.
The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the exhibits are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Summer Infant, Inc. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2012 |
By: |
/s/ Jason Macari |
|
|
Jason Macari |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: November 14, 2012 |
By: |
/s/ Paul Francese |
|
|
Paul Francese |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Offer Letter and Change of Control Agreement between Summer Infant, Inc. and Paul Francese (Incorporated by reference to Exhibits to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 13, 2012) |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Registrant and Paul Francese |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement between the Registrant and Paul Francese |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
101.INS * |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH * |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL * |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF * |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB * |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE * |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.