UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

RealPage, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

REALPAGE, INC.

Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

June 5, 2018

We are pleased to invite you to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of RealPage, Inc.

When and Where: The meeting will be held on June 5, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., local time, at RealPage, Inc.’s principal executive offices located at 2201 Lakeside Blvd., Richardson, Texas 75082.

Items of Business: The meeting is being held to conduct the following items of business which are described in greater detail in the Proxy Statement accompanying this notice:

Record Date: Our board of directors set April 10, 2018 as the record date for the meeting. Our stockholders of record at the close of business on that date are entitled to receive this notice and to vote at the meeting.

Meeting Attendance and Voting: All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, we hope that you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote by completing, signing and dating your proxy card and mailing it in the postage-prepaid envelope enclosed for that purpose. Voting by written proxy will ensure your representation at the meeting if you do not attend in person. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please review the instructions on the proxy card. Stockholders who attend the meeting may vote in person even if they have submitted a proxy. However, if you have submitted a proxy and wish to vote in person at the meeting, you must notify the inspector of elections of your intention to revoke the proxy that you previously submitted and instead vote in person at the meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, trustee, bank or other nominee, please bring a proxy card from the broker, trustee, bank or other nominee with you to confirm that you are entitled to vote the shares.

Additional Information: The 2018 Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders are included with this notice and are also available at http://investor.realpage.com.

Richardson, Texas

April 25, 2018

REALPAGE, INC.

Proxy Statement

For the

2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REALPAGE, INC.

2201 Lakeside Boulevard

Richardson, Texas 75082

(972) 820-3000

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE

2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

April 25, 2018

We are furnishing you this proxy statement and proxy card to solicit proxies on behalf of the board of directors (the “Board”) of RealPage, Inc. (“RealPage”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) to be voted at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held at our principal executive offices located at 2201 Lakeside Boulevard, Richardson, Texas 75082 on June 5, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., local time. The proxies also may be voted at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

We are first mailing the proxy materials to stockholders on April 25, 2018. Please refer to “Information Concerning Solicitation and Voting” located on page 53 in this proxy statement for information relating to the distribution of our annual meeting materials to our stockholders.

All properly executed written proxies and all properly completed proxies submitted by telephone or Internet that are delivered pursuant to this solicitation will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions given in the proxy, unless the proxy is revoked prior to completion of voting at the Annual Meeting.

Only owners of record of shares of our common stock as of the close of business on April 10, 2018 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. Each owner of record on the Record Date is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held. On the Record Date, 84,401,694 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value, were issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

The Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 are available at http://investor.realpage.com.

1

GOVERNANCE

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Composition

Our Board is currently composed of seven members, divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. There are currently three directors in Class I, two directors in Class II and two directors in Class III. The current terms of office of the Class II directors, Mr. Scott S. Ingraham and Mr. Jeffrey T. Leeds, will expire at this Annual Meeting and Mr. Ingraham and Mr. Leeds will stand for re-election to our Board at the Annual Meeting.

The terms of office of the Class III directors, Mr. Stephen T. Winn and Mr. Jason A. Wright, will expire at the 2019 annual meeting. The terms of office of the Class I directors, Mr. Alfred R. Berkeley, III, Mr. Peter Gyenes and Mr. Charles F. Kane, will expire at the 2020 annual meeting. Our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws provide that the number of directors will be fixed from time to time by a resolution of the majority of our Board. Nine directors are currently authorized.

Required Vote

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. The two nominees who receive the greatest number of votes cast will be elected directors for three-year terms, in each case until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Withheld votes and broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted either for or against the election of a director nominee. Cumulative voting is not permitted by our certificate of incorporation.

Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for our nominees named below. If any of our nominees is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for any nominee who is designated by the present Board to fill the vacancy. It is not expected that any nominee will be unable or will decline to serve as a director.

Recommendation of our Board for Proposal One

Our Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the nominees listed below.

2018 DIRECTOR NOMINEES — CLASS II DIRECTORS

The nominating and governance committee of our Board (“Nominating and Governance Committee”) recommended the two individuals set forth in the table below for nomination by our Board. Based on such recommendations, our Board nominated such directors for election at the Annual Meeting as Class II directors to serve for a term expiring at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal.

2

Our Board and Nominating and Governance Committee believe that the combination of the various qualifications, skills and experiences of the director nominees will contribute to an effective and well-functioning Board and that, individually and as a whole, the director nominees possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight of our business and quality advice and counsel to our management.

The following sets forth information concerning the nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting, including information as to each nominee’s age as of the Record Date, current principal occupation and business experience.

Class II Directors (Terms Expire in 2018)

Scott S. Ingraham has served as a member of our Board since February 2012 and as a member of our Audit Committee and our Nominating and Governance Committee since February 2012. Mr. Ingraham is presently the co-founder and Principal of Zuma Capital, Inc., a private investment firm. He co-founded and served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Rent.com, an Internet residential real estate listing site, from 1999 until its acquisition by eBay in February 2005. Prior to founding Rent.com, Mr. Ingraham was the CEO, president and co-founder of Oasis Residential, a NYSE-traded apartment REIT which merged into Camden Property Trust in 1998. Mr. Ingraham is on the Board of Trust Managers of Camden Property Trust (NYSE: CPT), a real estate investment trust focused on the development and ownership of apartment properties. Camden Property Trust is one our larger customers. Mr. Ingraham also serves as a director of Kilroy Realty Corporation (NYSE: KRC), a publicly held real estate investment trust focused on the development and ownership of office and industrial properties. Mr. Ingraham graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a BBA in Finance. We believe Mr. Ingraham’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his substantial financial and business expertise as the chief executive officer of several companies in the real estate industry and his significant experience serving on boards of other publicly traded companies.

Jeffrey T. Leeds has served as a member of our Board and a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee since December 1999. Mr. Leeds has served as chairman of our Nominating and Governance committee since February 2012. Mr. Leeds is President and Co-Founder of Leeds Equity Partners. Leeds Equity Partners, based in New York, is the oldest and largest private equity firm in the United States focused exclusively on investments in the Knowledge Industries — education, training, and business and information services. Prior to co-founding Leeds Equity Partners in 1993, Mr. Leeds spent seven years specializing in mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance at Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, a subsidiary of Lazard Group LLC. Prior to joining Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, Mr. Leeds served as a law clerk to the Hon. William J. Brennan, Jr. of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1985 October Term. Mr. Leeds also worked in the corporate department of the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP in New York. Mr. Leeds currently serves on the board of directors of BARBRI, INTO University Partnerships, Knowledge Factor, Medley Management Inc. (NASDAQ: MDLY), Fusion Education Group, Endeavor Schools, LLC and Simplify Compliance Holdings, LLC. Mr. Leeds served on the Board of Education Management Corporation (NASDAQ: EDMC) from June 2006 through July 2015. Mr. Leeds is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a member of the Board of Visitors at The Colin L. Powell School for Civic and Global Leadership at The City College of New York. Mr. Leeds received his B.A. in history summa cum laude from Yale University and his J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. He was also a Marshall Scholar at the University of Oxford. We believe Mr. Leeds’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive business and legal experience in corporate finance and his knowledge gained from service on the boards of various publicly traded and private companies.

3

INCUMBENT DIRECTORS WHOSE TERMS OF OFFICE CONTINUE AFTER THE ANNUAL MEETING

The following sets forth information concerning our directors whose terms of office continue after the Annual Meeting, including information as to each director’s age as of the Record Date, current principal occupation and business experience.

Class III Directors (Terms Expire in 2019)

Stephen T. Winn has served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board since November 1998, during which time he served as Chairman of our Board, and as our President since August 2012, a position that Mr. Winn previously held from November 1998 to December 2009. From January 1998 to March 1999, Mr. Winn served in various executive positions, including President of Research Institute of America, a provider of information services to the accounting industry and a wholly owned subsidiary of Thomson Reuters Corporation. From June 1969 to January 1998, Mr. Winn served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Computer Language Research Inc., a publicly traded company focused on tax compliance, tax research and accounting software, which was acquired by Thomson Reuters Corporation. Mr. Winn is a member of the board of directors of the National Multifamily Housing Council. In January 2002, he was one of 25 people recognized by the National Apartment Association as a leader in the multifamily industry. Mr. Winn received Ernst & Young LLP’s “Entrepreneur of the Year 2012 Southwest Area North Technology Sector.” Mr. Winn received his B.S. in electrical engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and his M.S. in management science from Stanford University. In addition to Mr. Winn’s role as our Chief Executive Officer, we believe Mr. Winn’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his previous service in executive positions at various public and private technology companies and his extensive experience in the multifamily rental housing industry.

Jason A. Wright has served as a member of our Board since December 2003 and as our lead independent director since February 2012. Mr. Wright has served as a member of our Audit Committee since January 2004 and served as chairman of our Audit Committee from February 2012 until February 2013. Mr. Wright has served as a member of our Compensation Committee since October 2006 and a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee since February 2010. Mr. Wright is a partner in the Tech & Telecom Group at Apax Partners LLC, where he focuses primarily on investments in enterprise software and technology-enabled services. Prior to joining Apax in 2000, Mr. Wright served in a variety of roles at General Electric Capital Corporation, a subsidiary of General Electric Corporation, including the evaluation and execution of investment opportunities for the Technology Ventures Group, and Mr. Wright was also a consultant at Andersen Consulting, now Accenture plc. Mr. Wright currently serves on the board of directors of various private companies. Mr. Wright received his B.A. in economics from Tufts University and his M.B.A. in finance from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. We believe Mr. Wright’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive business and financial experience related to enterprise software and technology-enabled services companies.

4

Class I Directors (Terms Expire in 2020)

Alfred R. Berkeley, III has served as a member of our Board since December 2003 and as a member of our Compensation Committee since January 2004. Mr. Berkeley also served as a member and as chairman of our Audit Committee from January 2004 to February 2012 and as our lead independent director from February 2011 to February 2012. Mr. Berkeley has served as Chairman of Princeton Capital Management, Inc., an investment adviser, since December 2012 and Princeton Capital Management LLC since September 2017. Mr. Berkeley has served as Vice Chairman of Gentag, Inc., a developer of technology for near field communications, since November 2011. Mr. Berkeley served as the Chairman of Pipeline Financial Group, Inc., the parent of Pipeline Trading Systems LLC, a block trading brokerage service, from December 2003 until November 2011. From December 2003 to March 2010, Mr. Berkeley also served as the Chief Executive Officer of Pipeline Financial Group, Inc. He also served as Acting Chairman of the National Infrastructure Advisory Council for the President of the United States from 2001 until December 2011. Mr. Berkeley also served as a trustee of Johns Hopkins University and a member of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC from 1999 until June 2011. He formerly served as Vice Chairman of the Nomination Evaluation Committee for the National Medal of Technology and Innovation, which makes candidate recommendations to the Secretary of Commerce. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. in July 2000, serving through July 2003, and served as President of NASDAQ from 1996 until 2000. From 1972 to 1996, Mr. Berkeley served in a number of capacities at Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated, which was acquired by Bankers Trust New York Corporation and later by Deutsche Bank AG. Most recently, he was Managing Director in the corporate finance department where he financed computer software and electronic commerce companies. He joined Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated as a Research Analyst in 1972 and became a general partner in 1983. From 1985 to 1987, he served as Head of Information Services for the firm. From 1988 to 1990, Mr. Berkeley took a leave of absence from Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of Rabbit Software Inc., a public telecommunications software company. He served as a captain in the United States Air Force and a major in the United States Air Force Reserve.

Mr. Berkeley also served as a director of Kintera, Inc. until May 2008, when it was acquired by Blackbaud, Inc. (NASDAQ: BLKB). Mr. Berkeley also served on the board of Fortegra Financial Corporation (NYSE: FRF), an insurance services company that provides distribution and administration services and insurance-related products to insurance companies, insurance brokers and agents and other financial services companies in the United States from December 2010 to November 2011. Mr. Berkeley served on the boards of directors of ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW) from 2008 until June 2012 and Edgar Online, Inc. (NASDAQ: EDGR), which was sold to RR Donnelley, from November 2010 through August 2012. Mr. Berkeley also serves as a director of several private companies. Mr. Berkeley received his B.A. in English from the University of Virginia and his M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. On October 24, 2011, Mr. Berkeley entered into a consent decree with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) relating to his role at Pipeline Trading Systems, LLC. We believe Mr. Berkeley’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his extensive experience in corporate finance and securities matters, including his experience as chief executive officer of various companies and his leadership positions with the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc., and his knowledge gained from service on the boards of various publicly traded and private companies and federal committees.

Peter Gyenes has served as a member or our Board since January 2010, as chairman of our Compensation Committee since February 2010, as a member of our Audit Committee since February 2010, and as a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee since February 2010. Mr. Gyenes has served as the non-executive Chairman of the board of directors of Sophos Group plc (LSE: SOPH), a global security software company, since March 2006, lead independent director from September 2012 to July 2015, and again as Chairman since July 2015. Mr. Gyenes served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ascential Software Corporation, a market leader in data integration software, and its predecessor companies VMark Software, Ardent Software and Informix from 1996 until it was acquired by International Business Machines Corporation in 2005. Mr. Gyenes served on the board of directors of Netezza Corporation from 2008 until it was acquired by International

5

Business Machines Corporation in 2010. Mr. Gyenes also served on the board of Lawson Software, Inc. from 2006 until it was acquired by Infor in July 2011, served on the board of EnerNoc (NASDAQ: ENOC) from 2013 until 2015, served on the board of Cimpress NV (NASDAQ: CMPR) from 2009 until 2015, and served on the board of IntraLinks Holdings, Inc. from 2008 to January 2017. He currently serves on the boards of directors of Pegasystems Inc. (NASDAQ: PEGA), a leader in cloud software for customer engagement and operational excellence, and Carbonite, Inc. (NASDAQ: CARB), a leading provider of online backup solutions for consumers and small and medium sized businesses, and serves as trustee emeritus of the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council. Mr. Gyenes received his B.A. in mathematics and his M.B.A. in marketing from Columbia University. We believe Mr. Gyenes’ qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as the Chief Executive Officer of a publicly traded company, his knowledge gained from service on the boards of various public and private companies and his more than 40 years of experience in technology, sales, marketing and general management positions within the computer systems and software industry.

Charles F. Kane has served as a member of our Board, as a member of our Compensation Committee and as a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee since June 2012. Mr. Kane has served as a member of our Audit Committee since June 2012 and as chairman of our Audit Committee since February 2013. Mr. Kane is an adjunct professor of international finance at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan Graduate Business School of Management. Mr. Kane is also a Director and Strategic Advisor of One Laptop Per Child, a non-profit organization founded at Massachusetts Institute of Technology that provides computing and internet access for students in the developing world, for whom he served as President and Chief Operating Officer from 2008 until 2009. Mr. Kane served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of Global BPO Services Corp., a special purpose acquisition corporation, from July 2007 until March 2008, and as Chief Financial Officer of Global BPO from August 2007 until March 2008. Prior to joining Global BPO, he served as Chief Financial Officer of RSA Security Inc., a provider of e-security solutions, from May 2006 until RSA was acquired by EMC Corporation in October 2006. From July 2003 until May 2006, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Aspen Technology, Inc., a provider of supply chain management software and professional services. Mr. Kane is currently a director of Carbonite, Inc. (NASDAQ: CARB), a leading provider of online backup solutions for consumers and small and medium sized businesses, Progress Software (NASDAQ: PRGS) is a global software company that simplifies the development, deployment and management of business applications on-premise or in the cloud, on any platform or device, to any data source, with enhanced performance, minimal IT complexity and low total cost of ownership. Mr. Kane was previously a director of Applix Inc., Borland Software Corporation, Demandware Inc. and Netezza Corporation. Mr. Kane is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.B.A. in accounting from the University of Notre Dame and an M.B.A. in international finance from Babson College. We believe Mr. Kane’s experience as a senior executive officer at a number of publicly traded companies, including as chief financial officer of several of those companies, and his experience serving on the boards of directors of other public and private companies, qualify him to serve on our Board.

As an Audit Committee financial expert and chairman of our Audit Committee, Mr. Kane provides a high level of expertise and leadership experience in the areas of finance, accounting, audit oversight and risk analysis derived from his experience as the chief financial officer of publicly traded technology companies. Mr. Kane also offers substantial public company board experience to our Board.

BOARD AND COMMITTEE GOVERNANCE

Board Leadership Structure

Our governance framework provides our Board with flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure for us. The current leadership structure is composed of a combined chairman of the board and chief executive officer, a lead independent director, Board committees led by independent directors and active engagement by all directors. Our Board believes this structure provides an effective balance between strong Company leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight by independent directors.

6

Our Board believes that our Chief Executive Officer, Stephen T. Winn, is best situated to serve as Chairman because he is the director most familiar with our business and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of strategy. Our independent directors have different perspectives and roles in strategic development. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside our company and industry, while the Chief Executive Officer brings company-specific experience and expertise. Our Board believes that the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer promotes strategy development and execution, and facilitates information flow between management and our Board, which are essential to effective governance.

Mr. Jason A. Wright serves as our lead independent director. Our lead independent director is responsible for coordinating activities of our other independent directors, presiding at all meetings of our Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors, serving as liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors, having the authority to call meetings of the independent directors, and performing various other duties as directed by our Board. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the lead independent director is charged with relaying the discussions of the executive sessions to the Chief Executive Officer, as appropriate, participating in the discussion of Chief Executive Officer performance with our Compensation Committee, and ensuring that our Board annually conducts a self-assessment.

Director Qualifications

Our Board believes that maintaining a Board with a range of skills and experience meeting our needs is important, as is maintaining a size that facilitates group discussion and collegiality.

Our Nominating and Governance Committee, consisting solely of independent directors as determined under applicable NASDAQ listing standards, is responsible for reviewing with our Board, on an annual basis, the requisite skills and characteristics of potential new Board members as well as the composition of our Board as a whole. This assessment includes members’ qualification as independent, as well as consideration of character, judgment, diversity, age, skills, including financial literacy, and experience in the context of the needs of our Board and our business. Nominees for directorship are selected by our Nominating and Governance Committee and approved by our Board in accordance with such policies and principles as our Board may promulgate after considering the recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which were adopted by our Board on January 20, 2015, provide that each director should be able and prepared to devote sufficient time and effort to his or her duties as a director. Directors are not permitted to sit on more than six publicly traded company boards or, if such director is a CEO of a public company, he or she is not permitted to sit on the board of more than two public companies besides the board of his or her own company.

Our Board does not have term limits. Directors who have served on our Board for an extended period of time are able to provide valuable insight into our operations and future based on their experience with and understanding of our industry, business operations, history, policy and objectives. Our Board believes that, as an alternative to term limits, it can ensure that the Board continues to evolve through the evaluation and nomination process required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that, as a general matter, a director should not stand for re-election as a non-employee director after his or her 75th birthday. Non-employee directors are required to tender their resignation no later than the expiration of their elected term following their 75th birthday. Retirement of a director who has reached the age of retirement may be postponed if our Board determines that it would be in the best interests of RealPage and its stockholders under the particular circumstances. In addition, our Board may nominate any person for election as a non-employee director regardless of his or her age if our Board determines that, due to his or her unique capabilities or special circumstances, the election of such person is in the best interest of RealPage.

7

Director Independence

In accordance with the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a majority of our Board must be composed of independent directors. Our Board has determined that each of Mr. Berkeley, Mr. Gyenes, Mr. Ingraham, Mr. Kane, Mr. Leeds and Mr. Wright is independent under applicable NASDAQ listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act.”

Board and Committee Meetings and Attendance

Under our bylaws, regular meetings of our Board are held at such times as our Board may determine. Special meetings of our Board may be called by a majority of the authorized number of directors, the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer, the President or the Secretary. Our Board held a total of seven meetings during 2017. Each director attended 75% or more of the total number of meetings of our Board and the committees of our Board on which such director served during 2017.

The non-employee directors on our Board and Board committees generally meet quarterly in executive session. Executive sessions of our Board may include, among other things, a discussion of the performance of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, matters concerning the relationship of our Board with the management directors and other members of senior management, and such other matters as the non-employee directors deem appropriate. No formal action of our Board is taken during executive sessions of the non-employee directors, although the non-employee directors may subsequently recommend matters for consideration by the full Board. In addition, our Audit Committee holds an executive session at each of its meetings and our Compensation Committee holds an executive session at the meeting in which annual compensation is reviewed and determined. On occasion, our non-employee directors invite our Chief Legal Officer to attend executive sessions in the role as legal counsel, but members of management, including Mr. Winn, are otherwise not present at executive sessions of Board and committee meetings. Although all of our current non-employee directors are considered to be independent, if any non-employee directors were determined not to be independent, the independent directors would be required to meet alone in an executive session at least twice per year.

Board Committees

Our Board has three standing committees:

Committee members are appointed by our Board, which considers the recommendation of our Nominating and Governance Committee and the desires of the individual directors. The table below lists the current membership of each committee and the number of committee meetings held in 2017.

8

Our Board has determined that each member of each committee is independent under the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations. Our Board has adopted a charter for each committee. Copies of such charters are available without charge, upon request in writing to RealPage, Inc., 2201 Lakeside Boulevard, Richardson, Texas 75082, Attn: Chief Legal Officer or on our website at http://investor.realpage.com/governance-documents or https://www.realpage.com/ by clicking on “Company,” “Investor Relations,” “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Documents.” We believe that the composition, charter and functioning of each of our committees comply with the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to comply with future requirements to the extent they become applicable to us.

The primary responsibilities of each committee are described below.

Audit Committee

Our Audit Committee’s responsibilities are specifically set forth in the committee’s charter, which can be found at http://investor.realpage.com/governance-documents or https://www.realpage.com/ by clicking on “Company,” “Investor Relations,” “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Documents.” Among other things, our Audit Committee is responsible for:

Our Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is independent under the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations, meets the requirements for financial literacy and sophistication, and qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee’s responsibilities are specifically set forth in the committee’s charter, which can be found at http://investor.realpage.com/governance-documents or https://www.realpage.com/ by clicking on “Company,” “Investor Relations,” “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Documents.” Among other things, our Compensation Committee is responsible for:

9

Our Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is independent under the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations, is a non-employee director, as defined by Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and is an outside director, as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Additional information regarding the processes and procedures that our Compensation Committee employs when considering and determining director and executive compensation, including the committee’s engagement of independent compensation consultants for advice in connection with the exercise of its responsibilities, is set forth below under “Governance — Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Nominating and Governance Committee

Our Nominating and Governance Committee’s responsibilities are specifically set forth in the committee’s charter, which can be found at http://investor.realpage.com/governance-documents or https://www.realpage.com/

10

by clicking on “Company,” “Investor Relations,” “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Documents.” Among other things, our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for:

Our Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders provided such recommendations are made in accordance with procedures described in this proxy statement under “Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals for 2019 Annual Meeting.” When considering a potential director candidate, our Nominating and Governance Committee looks for demonstrated character, judgment, relevant business, functional and industry experience, and a high degree of acumen. Our Nominating and Governance Committee also considers issues of diversity, such as education, professional experience and differences in viewpoints and skills. Our Nominating and Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, our Board and Nominating and Governance Committee believe that it is important that the members of our Board represent diverse viewpoints. Our Nominating and Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating nominees typically involves a series of internal discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. From time to time, we have also engaged one or more executive search consulting firms to assist in the identification and recruitment of potential director candidates. There are no differences in the manner in which our Nominating and Governance Committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder.

Board Oversight of Risk

Our Board oversees risk management in a number of ways. Our Audit Committee oversees the management of financial and accounting related risks as an integral part of its duties. Similarly, our Compensation Committee considers risk management when setting the compensation policies and programs for our executive officers and other employees. Our full Board considers various risk-related items periodically, including risks related to intellectual property, taxes, products and employees. Our Board also considers our efforts to manage such risks through safety measures, insurance or self-insurance.

Communication with our Board

Stockholders may communicate with members of our Board by mail addressed to the Chairman, to any other individual member of our Board, to the full Board, or to a particular committee of our Board. In each case, such correspondence should be sent to the following address: 2201 Lakeside Boulevard, Richardson, Texas 75082, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Correspondence received that is addressed to the members of our Board will be reviewed by our Chief Legal Officer or our Chief Legal Officer’s designee, who will forward such correspondence to the appropriate members of our Board.

ADDITIONAL GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

We are committed to strong corporate governance, which we believe promotes the long-term interests of stockholders, strengthens Board and management accountability and helps build public trust in RealPage.

11

Articles and Bylaws

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws can be accessed through our filings located in the “Company Filings” portion of the SEC website at www.sec.gov , and were attached as Exhibit 3.2 and Exhibit 3.4, respectively, to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the SEC on July 26, 2010. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board committee charters and other governance materials can be accessed on our website, http://investor.realpage.com/governance-documents or https://www.realpage.com/, by clicking on “Company,” “Investor Relations,” “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Documents.”

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The code applies to all of our employees, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions), directors and agents. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on our website at http://investor.realpage.com/governance-documents or https://www.realpage.com/, by clicking on “Company,” “Investor Relations,” “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Documents.” A copy also is available without charge upon request in writing to RealPage, Inc., 2201 Lakeside Boulevard, Richardson, Texas 75082, Attn: Chief Legal Officer. We intend to disclose future amendments to provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to any principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, or our directors, on our website to the extent and in the manner permitted by Item 5.05 of Form 8-K.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that address matters pertaining to director qualifications, director responsibilities, lead independent director responsibilities, executive sessions of Board meetings, communications with stockholders, Board committee matters, director access to officers, employees and independent advisors, director compensation, director minimum stock ownership requirements, director orientation and continuing education, Chief Executive Officer evaluation, management and Board succession, indemnification and director and officer insurance, and annual Board performance evaluations. A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website at http://investor.realpage.com/governance-documents or https://www.realpage.com/, by clicking on “Company,” “Investor Relations,” “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance Documents.” A copy also is available without charge upon request in writing to RealPage, Inc., 2201 Lakeside Boulevard, Richardson, Texas 75082, Attn: Chief Legal Officer.

Director Minimum Stock Ownership Requirements

Our Board members are encouraged to make a substantial investment in Company stock. Accordingly, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require our directors to own a number of shares of our common stock with an aggregate value equal to at least three times their annual cash retainer within four years after joining our Board or as soon thereafter as is practicable. Our Board has also adopted a Stock Ownership Guidelines Policy for our Chief Executive Officer as described under “Executive Compensation — Other Executive Compensation Consideration — Executive Stock Ownership” below.

Hedging, Short Sale and Pledging Policy under our Insider Trading Policy

We have adopted an Insider Trading Policy. That policy prohibits all employees, including our executive officers, and all directors and agents from purchasing any financial instrument that is designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our securities. All employees, including our executive officers, and all of our directors and agents are also prohibited from pledging our securities or engaging in short sales of our securities.

12

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders

We encourage, but do not require, our directors to attend our annual stockholders’ meeting. Our 2017 annual stockholders’ meeting was attended by one of our directors, Stephen T. Winn, our Chairman, CEO and President.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Determining Compensation for Non-Employee Directors in 2017

Our Compensation Committee reviews and makes recommendations to our Board regarding the form and amount of compensation for non-employee directors. Directors who are employees of RealPage receive no compensation for service on our Board. Our director compensation program is designed to enable continued attraction and retention of highly qualified directors by ensuring that director compensation is in line with peer companies competing for director talent, and is designed to address the time, effort, expertise and accountability required of active board membership. Our Compensation Committee and our Board believe that annual compensation for non-employee directors should consist of both a cash component, designed to compensate members for their service on our Board and its committees, and an equity component, designed to align the interests of directors and stockholders and, by vesting over time, to create an incentive for continued service on our Board.

Discussion of Director Compensation

In 2017, the annual compensation for our non-employee directors was composed of cash compensation in the form of an annual retainer and meeting and committee fees and equity compensation in the form of restricted stock awards. Each of these components is described below.

Independent Director Compensation Plan

Our independent director compensation plan provided for the following compensation to our independent directors during 2017:

The term “independent directors” for purposes of our independent director compensation plan means each of our non-employee directors. The annual equity grants occur automatically on April 1 of each year, pursuant to the terms of the RealPage, Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated June 4, 2014), as further amended (the “2010 Equity Incentive Plan”).

On April 1, 2017, pursuant to our amended independent director compensation plan and the automatic annual restricted stock grant provisions of our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, we issued 5,729 shares of our restricted common stock to each of Alfred R. Berkeley, III, Peter Gyenes, Scott S. Ingraham, Charles F. Kane, Jeffrey T. Leeds, and Jason A. Wright.

13

On April 1, 2018, pursuant to our amended independent director compensation plan and the automatic annual restricted stock grant provisions of our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, we issued 3,843 shares of our restricted common stock to each of Alfred R. Berkeley, III, Peter Gyenes, Scott S. Ingraham, Charles F. Kane, Jeffrey T. Leeds, and Jason A. Wright.

Director Compensation Table for Year Ended December 31, 2017

The following table sets forth the annual director compensation paid or accrued by us to individuals who were directors during any part of 2017. The table excludes Stephen T. Winn, who is our Chief Executive Officer and who did not receive any compensation from us in his role as director in 2017.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS.

Since January 1, 2017, there has not been, nor is there currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or are a party in which the amount involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000 and in which any of our directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation arrangements with directors and executive officers, which are described under “Governance — Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and the following transaction. Ms. Glover’s sister in law has been a non-executive employee of RealPage since May 2011, and in such capacity receives annual compensation in excess of $120,000. Such employment terms were established by RealPage directly with Ms. Glover’s sister in law and are based upon market terms and not based upon Ms. Glover’s relationship with us.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

Certain restricted stock grants to our non-employee directors are described in “Director Compensation.”

Certain stock option and restricted stock grants to our named executive officers (“NEOs”) are described in “Executive Compensation — Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” “Executive Compensation — Compensation Tables — Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2017” and “Executive Compensation — Compensation Tables — Supplemental Information Regarding Arrangements With Executive Officers — Employment Agreements.”

14

Employment Arrangements and Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our executive officers that include, among other things, compensation terms, provisions regarding payments upon termination in certain circumstances and confidentiality, non-competition and indemnification provisions. The employment agreements with our NEOs are described under “Executive Compensation — Compensation Tables — Supplemental Information Regarding Arrangements With Executive Officers — Employment Agreements.”

Other Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

Our Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance any related party transaction. Our Audit Committee has not adopted specific policies or guidelines relating to the approval of related party transactions. Our directors who are members of our Audit Committee determine whether to approve related party transactions in the exercise of their fiduciary duties as directors and members of our Audit Committee.

Limitations on Liability and Indemnification Matters

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation contains provisions that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that we are required to indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and restated bylaws also provide that we are obligated to advance expenses incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to indemnify him or her under the provisions of Delaware law. We have entered into agreements to indemnify our directors, executive officers and other employees as determined by our Board. With specified exceptions, these agreements provide for indemnification for related expenses including, among other things, attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by any of these individuals in any action or proceeding. We believe that these bylaw provisions and indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may discourage stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and officers for breach of their fiduciary duties. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a stockholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as required by these indemnification provisions. At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers or employees for which indemnification is sought, and we are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification.

15

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

OWNERSHIP OF EQUITY SECURITIES OF REALPAGE

The following table sets forth information regarding ownership of our common stock by:

The amounts for our NEOs and executive officers and directors as a group and our significant stockholders are as of April 10, 2018, the Record Date, unless otherwise indicated in a footnote below (and in that case are based upon SEC filings made on behalf of such owners). Beneficial ownership in this table is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, the number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding includes all shares of restricted stock, and those shares issuable upon exercise of options held by the respective person or group that may be exercised within 60 days after April 10, 2018. For purposes of calculating each person’s or group’s percentage ownership, unvested stock options exercisable within 60 days and all shares of restricted stock are included for that person or group, but not for any other person or group. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on the shares of common stock outstanding as of April 10, 2018. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with an asterisk (*).

16

17

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and changes in ownership on Form 4 or Form 5 with the SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, we believe that, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10% stockholders were satisfied.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth the name, age, and position of each of our executive officers as of the Record Date.

Executive Officers

Stephen T. Winn serves as our Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, and is a member of our Board. See “Governance — Incumbent Directors Whose Terms Of Office Continue After The Annual Meeting” for additional information with respect to Mr. Winn.

W. Bryan Hill has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since May 2014. Mr. Hill previously served as our Senior Vice President-Finance from May 2007 to May 2014 with responsibilities including investor relations, credit facility management, financial planning and analysis, internal reporting, merger and acquisition support, product pricing control and billing. Mr. Hill previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of formerly publicly traded Dyncorp International, Inc. (acquired by Cerberus Capital Management in 2010), a provider of outsourced services to civilian and military government agencies, from August 2005 to April 2007. From April 2000 to August 2005, Mr. Hill held the position of Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and various other financial management positions at SourceHov LLC, a document and information outsourcing solution provider. Mr. Hill received his B.B.A. from Texas Christian University and has been a Certified Public Accountant in the State of Texas since 1996.

Andrew Blount has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Innovation Officer since January 2018, where he manages innovation of new products and services. Mr. Blount also served as Executive Vice President, Consumer Solutions from March 2017 until January 2018, where he managed product development for all prospect and resident-facing solutions. Mr. Blount also served as our Group Vice President of Consumer Solutions from December 2015 until March 2017 and as a consultant to us from December 2004 through December 2015 to provide services for development and assessment of software and websites. Mr. Blount served as the founder and CEO of Realhound.com, a commercial real estate software company, from November 2004 until December 2015. Mr. Blount developed and launched several successful ventures and served as a consultant for many large companies, including CB Richard Ellis, Fannie Mae and AT&T. Mr. Blount developed an application named Portfolio designed to provide business intelligence for multifamily owners and managers,

18

which RealPage purchased in June 2002. Mr. Blount also served as a city councilman from December 2012 until December 2016 and also as mayor from December 2013 until December 2016 of the City of Laguna Hills, California. Mr. Blount is a member of the National Multifamily Housing Council and National Apartment Association.

William P. Chaney has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Product Officer since January 2018 leading the Company’s product management, development and information technology. With his extensive experience in our enterprise solution offerings, Mr. Chaney served as our Executive Vice President, Enterprise Solutions from August 2012 until January 2018 where he led the Resident Management, Property Management and Leasing & Marketing product divisions as well as shared services for Contact Center, RealPage Exchange, Product Development and Information Technology. Previously he served as President, OneSite and Velocity from 2009 to August 2012 and managed all aspects of RealPage’s property management, resident billing, invoicing, payments, and infrastructure businesses. Mr. Chaney also previously served as our Senior Vice President of product management, leading the payment services team responsible for RealPage’s integrated web-based payment processing solution. Prior to joining RealPage, Mr. Chaney served as group president of Jack Henry & Associates Enterprise Payment Solutions from October 2004 to June 2008 and CEO of Select Payment Processing from August 1999 to October 2004. Mr. Chaney received his B.S. in computer science from Texas Christian University.

Ashley Glover has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer since January 2018. Ms. Glover manages international operations and customer acquisition, assimilation and retention organizations. Ms. Glover served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer from August 2016 until January 2018. Ms. Glover served as a consultant in real estate investment, operations, and strategy in the US and Europe from January 2014 to July 2016. Ms. Glover served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer from February 2012 to December 2013 and previously served as our Executive Vice President, Multifamily Solutions from January 2010 to February 2012, as our Executive Vice President, Resident Solutions from April 2009 to January 2010 and as our Senior Vice President, Velocity Utility and Billing Services, from March 2005 until April 2009. From November 2004 through early March 2005, Ms. Glover served in a consulting capacity for us in conjunction with our acquisition of The Pleco Group, LLC. From August 1995 to July 1997 and again from August 1999 to July 2003, Ms. Glover handled both international and domestic assignments for McKinsey & Company. Ms. Glover received her B.S. in computer science from Southern Methodist University and her M.B.A. from Harvard University.

David G. Monk has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since January 2016. Mr. Monk is responsible for management of our legal department and compliance operations. Mr. Monk previously served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary from May 2015 through January 2016, and as Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel from June 2010 through April 2015. Prior to joining us, Mr. Monk was a partner in private practice with the international law firm Baker Botts L.L.P., where he practiced from October 1992 to June 2010 and represented clients on a variety of matters including mergers and acquisitions, securities offerings, SEC compliance, corporate governance, technology and outsourcing transactions, and general corporate matters. Mr. Monk received his B.B.A. in finance from Texas A&M University and his J.D. from Southern Methodist University’s Dedman School of Law.

19

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or “CD&A,” describes our executive compensation program for 2017. In particular, this CD&A explains how the Compensation Committee of our Board made 2017 compensation decisions for the following named executive officers, or “NEOs”, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, who include our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and each of the three most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. This CD&A also describes decisions made by our Compensation Committee related to compensation that applies to the NEOs for 2018.

This CD&A should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures that follow this discussion.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our philosophy is to provide a compensation opportunity to each of our NEOs that is commensurate with his or her position and experience, provide incentives for the NEO to meet and exceed challenging but reasonably attainable short-term and long-term corporate objectives as determined by our Board and align the NEOs’ incentives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Additionally, our executive compensation program is intended to provide significant motivation for each of our NEOs to remain employed by us unless and until we determine that retention of the NEO is no longer in accord with our corporate objectives. Our Compensation Committee has also reviewed with management the design and operation of our incentive compensation arrangements for all employees and concluded that our compensation plans, programs and policies, considered as a whole, including applicable risk-mitigation features, are appropriate and do not encourage inappropriate risk taking or risk taking that is likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Based on this philosophy, the primary objectives of our Board and Compensation Committee with respect to executive compensation are to:

To achieve these objectives, our Compensation Committee periodically evaluates our executive compensation program with the goal of establishing compensation opportunities at levels our Compensation Committee believes to be competitive with those of our designated peer group companies. Additionally, we design our executive compensation program to tie a portion of each NEO’s overall cash compensation to key strategic, financial and operational goals set by our Board.

20

Compensation Decision-Making Process

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing and approving our executive compensation program. Our Compensation Committee currently consists of Alfred R. Berkeley, III, Peter Gyenes, Charles F. Kane, and Jason A. Wright. Mr. Gyenes has been appointed to serve as the Chairman of our Compensation Committee. Our Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is independent under the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations, is a non-employee director, as defined by Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and is an outside director, as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. For a discussion of the specific responsibilities of our Compensation Committee, see “Governance — Board and Committee Governance — Board Committees.”

Our Compensation Committee makes base salary, cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation recommendations for our Chief Executive Officer, based upon his performance and contributions to achieving our overall corporate objectives. Our Chief Executive Officer is not present during deliberations or voting by the Compensation Committee regarding his performance goals, performance evaluation or compensation level, and he abstains from voting on matters where our Board acts on our Compensation Committee’s recommendations regarding his compensation.

For purposes of determining compensation levels for our Chief Executive Officer, our Compensation Committee considers our overall achievement of corporate objectives, Company performance, the performance and individual contributions of our Chief Executive Officer, public company proxy data, survey group market data, advice from an independent executive compensation consultant, our Chief Executive Officer’s equity ownership and our Compensation Committee members’ own experience in compensation-related matters.

With respect to our other NEOs, our Chief Executive Officer makes base salary, cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation recommendations to our Compensation Committee based on the NEO’s level of responsibility, performance and contribution to achieving our overall corporate objectives. Our Compensation Committee also considers Company performance, public company proxy data, survey group market data, information received from our Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant, each NEO’s equity ownership and our Compensation Committee members’ own experience in compensation-related matters. Our Compensation Committee considers the Chief Executive Officer’s input but retains complete authority to approve all compensation related decisions for our NEOs.

Our Compensation Committee also considers the results of the advisory “say-on-pay” vote by our stockholders. Our last say-on-pay vote was at our 2017 annual stockholders’ meeting, where approximately 92% of the votes cast were voted to approve the executive compensation program described in our 2017 proxy statement. Our Compensation Committee will review the results of our say-on-pay vote at our 2018 annual stockholders’ meeting and will continue to consider the outcome of stockholder advisory votes on executive compensation when making future decisions relating to the compensation of our NEOs and our executive compensation programs and policies. Our Compensation Committee also continues to consider the alignment of NEO incentives with the long-term interests of our stockholders. In its compensation decisions in 2017 and 2018, our Compensation Committee continued to place emphasis on performance-based components, including market-based restricted stock and performance-based cash compensation, as described in this Proxy Statement. Our Compensation Committee structures performance-based cash and equity incentives to align directly with Company performance. Market-based long-term incentive awards do not vest if their share price targets are not achieved, and cash-based performance incentives are not earned if certain targets are not achieved. On an ongoing basis we also engage with our stockholders regarding various matters including executive compensation and corporate governance.

For purposes of evaluating compensation levels for 2017 and 2018, our Compensation Committee also considered competitive market benchmarking data as described in “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Competitive Positioning.”

21

Competitive Positioning

Competitive market data is an important component in determining the amount of each element of compensation for each of our NEOs. While actual compensation reflects our performance, our goal is for total target compensation, including each element of compensation, to be at or around the median target compensation for executives with similar positions in the 2017 Peer Group as described below. We incorporate flexibility into our compensation programs and into the assessment process to respond to changing business needs, and to take into consideration individual performance, including the relative complexity and strategic importance of specific roles.

Our Compensation Committee utilizes Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC, or “PM”, an executive compensation consulting firm, to provide advice regarding the structure of executive compensation as well as competitive data on base salary, target total cash compensation and long-term incentives. In addition, our Compensation Committee reviews the total compensation package for each NEO from the perspective of target total direct compensation, which includes base salary, total annual cash incentive plan and the value and structure of the long-term incentive award.

Pursuant to its charter, our Compensation Committee has the authority to select and retain independent advisors and counsel to assist with carrying out its duties and responsibilities, and we have provided appropriate funding to our Compensation Committee to engage outside consultants from time to time, to conduct market reviews of our executive compensation program and philosophy in order to assess the competitiveness of our program.

Our Compensation Committee regularly reviews the services provided by its outside consultants and believes that PM is independent in providing executive compensation consulting services. Our Compensation Committee conducted a specific review of its relationship with PM in 2017 and determined that PM’s work for the committee did not raise any conflicts of interest, consistent with the guidance provided under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), and by the SEC and NASDAQ. PM reports directly to our Compensation Committee Chair, takes direction from our Compensation Committee, and does not provide RealPage with any services other than the services provided at the request of our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee continues to monitor the independence of its compensation consultant on a periodic basis.

In the first quarter of 2017, our Compensation Committee engaged PM to conduct an independent market review of our executive compensation program. PM used public company proxy data and survey market data references to compare our total compensation practices for our executives to those in our market:

22

The 2017 Peer Group for this analysis was developed in consultation among our Compensation Committee, our management team and PM and consisted of the following organizations:

We periodically review our peer group to confirm that the roster of companies remains appropriate for external benchmarking in light of external merger and acquisition activity and our own business evolution. In the first quarter of 2017, we removed Constant Contact, Inc., Epiq Systems, Inc., HomeAway, Inc., Qlik Technologies, Inc. and SolarWinds Inc. from our peer group in recognition that these companies were no longer independently traded companies following merger and acquisition activity. We removed Ebix Inc. as we determined it was no longer an appropriate peer with respect to revenue size. We added Aspen Technology, Inc., Manhattan Associates, Inc., Splunk Inc. and TiVo Corporation to the 2017 peer group.

PM benchmarked our executive compensation levels, including base salaries, performance-based cash bonuses and long-term equity incentive awards, to those of other executives in the 2017 Peer Group. The PM report indicated that pay levels on average for target cash compensation (base salary plus target bonus) were competitive and close to the market median, while long-term incentive value compensation was somewhat higher, also taking into account a larger new-hire grant in 2017 for Ms. Glover. Compensation levels varied by executive role and among the peer group companies, and our total compensation pay levels including long-term incentives were at or within a 15% range of the market median for their comparative pay levels, with amounts varying by role. Based upon the peer group data and the competitive analysis performed by PM, we believe our total compensation levels are competitive with our peer group, and long-term incentive compensation is generally weighted more toward performance-based compensation than that of our peers, in particular with respect to long-term incentive compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, which is based solely upon our performance.

In February 2018, PM also performed a CEO pay-for-performance assessment. Our Compensation Committee reviewed the pay structure for our Chief Executive Officer and determined that Mr. Winn’s compensation is structured to promote alignment with our stock performance, and in particular long-term incentives are predicated upon achievement of stock price targets associated with stock price appreciation. In performing this assessment, PM evaluated our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation targets against the 2017 Peer Group.

2017 Elements of Executive Compensation

During 2017, the compensation of our NEOs included the following components:

23

Base Salaries

Base salaries are used to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of all of our NEOs. Base salaries for our NEOs typically have been negotiated as a part of the employment agreements with our NEOs at the outset of employment. From time to time, consistent with our executive compensation program objectives, base salaries for our NEOs, together with other components of compensation, are evaluated for adjustment by our Compensation Committee based on an assessment of the overall achievement of corporate objectives, each NEO’s sustained performance and compensation trends in our industry. Each NEO’s employment agreement requires that his or her base salary be reviewed no less frequently than annually; however, none of our NEOs has an employment agreement that provides for automatic or scheduled increases in base salary.

In addition to the factors described above, the base salary for our Chief Executive Officer takes into account Mr. Winn’s equity ownership in RealPage and his continuing contributions as the founder of RealPage.

In February 2017, our Compensation Committee conducted a review of our executive compensation program for purposes of evaluating compensation levels for our executives for 2017. Based on the considerations described above in “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Decision-Making Process,” our Compensation Committee approved base salaries for Mr. Winn, Mr. Hill, Mr. Blount, Mr. Chaney and Ms. Glover, each effective as of March 1, 2017, as outlined below.

Performance-Based Cash Bonuses

Our Chief Executive Officer’s performance-based cash bonus in 2017 was provided under the terms of a separate plan approved by our stockholders designed to qualify payments as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “162(m) Qualified MIP”). During 2017, Mr. Winn’s financial performance targets under the 162(m) Qualified MIP were based on our achievement of financial performance objectives, including non-GAAP total revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets, and an assessment of our Chief Executive Officer’s individual performance. The 162(m) Qualified MIP requires that the performance bonus, up to the maximum potential, is funded only if we achieve minimum target non-GAAP total revenue and adjusted EBITDA levels. The actual bonus for Mr. Winn is determined based on Compensation Committee evaluation of performance against the 162(m) Qualified MIP performance criteria. In February 2017, our Compensation Committee approved the continued participation by Mr. Winn in our 162(m) Qualified MIP for 2017, and Performance Goals (as defined in the 162(m) Qualified MIP) related to such plan for 2017. The target bonus for Mr. Winn for 2017 under the 162(m) Qualified MIP was 100% of Mr. Winn’s base salary with a maximum bonus potential of 200% of Mr. Winn’s target bonus for achieving financial and individual performance objectives in excess of the targets and a minimum bonus potential of 0% of Mr. Winn’s target bonus.

In 2017, our NEOs other than Mr. Winn participated in our annual non-equity management incentive plans, which also apply to our other senior managers. Our annual management incentive plans are intended to provide cash compensation to our other NEOs and senior managers for their contribution to the achievement of our strategic, operational and financial objectives. Our other NEOs earn amounts under our management incentive plans based on our achievement of financial performance objectives, including non-GAAP total revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets and an assessment of the NEO’s individual performance. In February 2017, our Compensation Committee approved the 2017 Management Incentive Plan (the “2017 MIP”), which outlines overall corporate objectives for the fiscal year in addition to establishing guidelines for calculating management

24

incentive plan bonuses in the event that performance objectives are partially achieved or exceeded. The financial performance objectives for the 2017 MIP were identical to those under the 162(m) Qualified Plan. In assessing an executive’s individual performance, we consider the executive’s level of job responsibilities, the prior performance of the executive, the executive’s experience and tenure, compensation of the other RealPage executive officers and the expected future contributions of the executive.

Participants in the 2017 MIP may receive a quarterly payout on a proportional basis based on progression towards the annual achievement of performance objectives for the 2017 MIP. The full-year annual cash bonuses paid to participants under our 2017 MIP with respect to a particular fiscal year are adjusted at year end based on actual achievement of both financial and individual performance objectives.

The 2017 MIP target bonus for each of Mr. Hill, Mr. Blount, Mr. Chaney, and Ms. Glover was 50% of such NEO’s base salary with a maximum bonus potential of 200% of such NEO’s target bonus for achieving financial and individual performance objectives in excess of the targets and a minimum bonus potential of 0% of such NEO’s target bonus.

For each of Mr. Winn, Mr. Hill, and Mr. Chaney, the 2017 performance targets for non-GAAP total revenue, adjusted EBITDA and individual performance ratings were weighted 30%, 45% and 25%, respectively. For Mr. Blount and Ms. Glover, the 2017 performance targets for non-GAAP total revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and individual performance ratings were weighted 45%, 30% and 25%, respectively.

The minimum targets for non-GAAP total revenue and adjusted EBITDA for 2017 were increased significantly from the actual results achieved on such measures in 2016, to reflect the growth of our business. The table below summarizes the minimum, target and maximum performance level and the actual results for each performance measure for 2017.

The performance metrics employed in the 162(m) Qualified MIP and 2017 MIP are adjusted from total revenue and EBITDA metrics calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) as follows:

Non-GAAP Total Revenue. We define this metric as total GAAP revenue plus acquisition-related and other deferred revenue adjustments.

Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss), plus (1) acquisition-related and other deferred revenue adjustments, (2) depreciation, asset impairment, and the loss on disposal of assets, (3) amortization of intangible assets, (4) acquisition-related expense (income), (5) costs arising from the Hart-Scott-Rodino review process for our acquisitions, (6) interest expense, net, (7) income tax expense (benefit), (8) headquarters relocation costs, and (9) stock-based expense. We believe that investors and financial analysts find this non-GAAP financial measure to be useful in analyzing our financial and operational performance, comparing this performance to our peers and competitors, and understanding our ability to generate income from ongoing business operations.

25

As a result of the calculations described above, our Compensation Committee determined that 2017 performance objectives were achieved and directed payments of the following bonuses to our NEOs pursuant to the 162(m) Qualified Plan or the 2017 MIP.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

Our equity award program is the primary vehicle for offering long-term incentives to our NEOs. In 2017, the equity awards to our NEOs consisted of restricted stock awards. We believe that equity-based compensation in the form of restricted stock awards provides our NEOs with a direct interest in our long-term performance, creates an ownership culture and aligns the interests of our NEOs and our stockholders.

In providing long-term incentives for our Chief Executive Officer, our Compensation Committee granted to Mr. Winn 100% performance-based equity incentives in the form of market-based restricted stock awards that become eligible to vest only if the trading price of our common stock rises to specified levels and exceeds those levels for a 20-day trading period. The stock price targets require significant stock price increases in order to vest, and thus are tied directly to our market performance. The market-based awards have eligibility and vesting terms based upon a target performance level, with lower vesting possible at a threshold level, and maximum vesting possible at a higher performance level. Once the applicable performance level is achieved, the associated portion of the award becomes eligible to vest in quarterly installments over a one-year period. The target payout amount for such award is 66.7% of the total number of shares issued, maximum payout is 100% of the total number of shares issued, and the threshold, target and maximum achievement levels, require a 25%, 35% and 50% increase, respectively, in our stock price in order to achieve at each such performance level. The stock price targets must be achieved over a period of 20 consecutive trading days, which we believe is an appropriate time period because it is a significant and sustained period of time. Once shares become eligible to vest under such award, they also contain an additional retentive time-based component, whereby such shares vest in quarterly increments over a one-year period thereafter (subject to acceleration of vesting on July 1, 2020 for any then-unvested shares that became eligible to vest prior to that date). Our Compensation Committee views these market-based restricted stock awards as directly linking achievement of our performance and stock price to our Chief Executive Officer’s long-term incentive compensation, and thus they are “pay for performance” compensation having value only if the stock price increases to the target.

In February 2017, our Compensation Committee granted to the NEOs other than Mr. Winn a combination of market-based and time-based restricted stock awards. The market-based restricted stock awards had the same performance criteria as those for Mr. Winn described above.

The time-based awards of restricted stock granted to our NEOs other than Mr. Winn in 2017 vest quarterly over a three-year period, subject to continued service to the Company. We believe that the three-year vesting period furthers our objective of executive retention as it provides an incentive to our executives to remain in our employ during the vesting period, and is consistent with competitive practice among our peers.

Our Compensation Committee typically grants equity awards to Mr. Winn and our other NEOs annually during the first quarter of the year, in connection with its annual review of our executive and employee compensation program, generally, and its assessment of achievement of prior-year performance targets for payments of cash bonuses under our management incentive plans as described under “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2017 Elements of Executive Compensation — Performance-Based Cash Bonuses.”

26

In determining the value of the equity grants for our Chief Executive Officer in 2017, our Compensation Committee considered comparative data for both the size of annual equity awards and total equity ownership of Chief Executive Officers employed by companies in our 2017 Peer Group, our overall achievement of corporate objectives, the Chief Executive Officer’s individual performance objectives, the achievement of certain strategic initiatives, the amount of equity previously awarded to the Chief Executive Officer, and the vesting of previous awards. In determining the value of equity grants to our NEOs other than our Chief Executive Officer in 2017, our Compensation Committee considered comparative data for both the size of annual equity awards and total equity ownership of executives employed by companies in our Select Peer Group, our overall achievement of corporate objectives, the applicable NEO’s achievement of individual performance objectives, the achievement of certain strategic initiatives, the amount of equity previously awarded to the NEO, the vesting of previous awards, and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer.

The amount and terms of the stock options and restricted stock we granted to our NEOs in 2017 are more fully described under “Executive Compensation — Compensation Tables — Grants of Plan-Based Awards.”

Benefits and Other Compensation

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in broad-based employee benefit plans, which are provided to all eligible U.S.-based employees. These plans include a group medical program, a group dental program, life insurance, disability insurance, flexible spending accounts and a 401(k) retirement savings plan. Additional benefit programs offered to our NEOs and all full-time U.S.-based employees include programs for job-related educational assistance, group term life insurance equivalent to 1.5 times an employee’s annual base salary up to a $600,000 maximum, and an employee assistance program. Our NEOs are also entitled to receive reimbursement for up to $3,500 per year for medical benefits to be used toward preventative medical expenses, including annual physical examinations.

We believe these benefits are consistent with the benefits offered by companies with which we compete for employees, including executive officers, and are necessary to attract and retain qualified individuals for those roles.

Perquisites

We believe that cash and equity compensation are the two key components in attracting and retaining management talent and therefore do not provide any additional perquisites to our NEOs.

2018 Compensation Determinations

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee performed a competitive assessment and evaluated the elements of our executive compensation program and the performance of RealPage and each of the NEOs in 2017. Our Compensation Committee also reviewed a revised 2018 Peer Group of 15 companies. In the first quarter of 2018, we removed Interactive Intelligence Group Inc. and NetSuite Inc. from our peer group in recognition that these companies were no longer independently traded companies following merger and acquisition activity. As in 2017, the peer group for 2018 compensation was used in combination with other survey data to analyze compensation trends. See “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Competitive Positioning.” In February 2018, our Compensation Committee approved the following elements of compensation for each of the NEOs for 2018.

27

Base Salaries

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee conducted a review of our executive compensation program for purposes of evaluating compensation levels for our executives for 2018. Based on the considerations described above in “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Decision-Making Process,” our Compensation Committee approved the following base salaries to be effective as of March 1, 2018:

Performance-Based Cash Bonuses

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee approved the participation by Mr. Winn and our other NEOs in the 2018 MIP. The 2018 target bonus under the 2018 MIP for Mr. Winn is 100% of his base salary with a maximum bonus potential of 200% of target bonus for achieving financial and individual performance objectives in excess of the targets, and a minimum bonus potential of 0% of Mr. Winn’s target bonus. The 2018 MIP target bonus for Mr. Hill is 60%, for Mr. Chaney and Ms. Glover is 55% and for Mr. Blount is 50% of such NEO’s base salary with a maximum bonus potential of 200% of such NEO’s target bonus for achieving financial and individual performance objectives in excess of the targets, and a minimum bonus potential of 0% of such NEO’s target bonus.

The performance metrics for our NEOs under the 2018 MIP will consist of the following:

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee approved grants to Mr. Winn consisting of 100% performance-based equity incentives in the form of market-based restricted stock awards that become eligible to vest only if the trading price of our common stock rises to specified levels and exceeds those levels for a 20-day trading period. Similar to the 2017 awards, the stock price targets require significant price increases in order to become eligible to vest, and thus are tied directly to our performance. The market-based awards have eligibility and vesting terms based upon a target performance level, with lower vesting possible at a threshold level, and maximum vesting possible at a higher performance level. Once the applicable performance levels are achieved, the associated portion of the award becomes eligible to vest in quarterly installments over a one-year period. The amounts reflected below are the maximum payout amounts that would be achieved upon reaching the maximum market achievement level. The target payout amounts are 50% of the maximum amounts set forth in the table, and the threshold, target, exceed and maximum achievement levels require a 25%, 37.5%, 50% and 75% increase, respectively, in our stock price in order to achieve at each such performance level. In February 2018, our Compensation Committee also approved grants of a combination of market-based and time-based restricted stock awards to each of the NEOs other than Mr. Winn. The market-based awards granted to the other NEOs had the same four-tier achievement requirements as those awarded to Mr. Winn. The time-based awards of restricted

28

stock granted to our NEOs other than Mr. Winn in 2018 vest quarterly over a three-year period, subject to continued service to the Company. The total awards (based on maximum payout percentages with respect to the market-based awards) were as follows:

2018 GRANTS FOR PLAN BASED AWARDS

Other Executive Compensation Considerations

Trading Controls and Hedging, Short Sale and Pledging Policies under our Insider Trading Policy

All employees, including our NEOs, directors and agents of RealPage are required to receive permission from us and certify they are not in possession of any non-public material inside information prior to entering into any transactions in our securities, including, but not limited to, gifts, grants and transactions involving derivatives. Generally, trading is permitted only during announced trading periods. Employees who are subject to trading restrictions, including our NEOs, may enter into trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. These trading plans may be entered into only during an open trading period and must be approved by us. Any employee, including any executive officer or affiliate bears full responsibility if he or she violates our policy by permitting shares to be bought or sold without preapproval or when trading is restricted. All of our employees, including our executive officers, directors and agents are prohibited from pledging our securities or from entering into hedging and short sale transactions with respect to our securities pursuant to our Insider Trading Policy.

Clawback Provisions

Equity awards granted to our NEOs under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan contain provisions under which the executives may be required to forfeit equity awards or profits from equity awards if they engage in certain conduct including, but not limited to, violations of our policies. Awards granted under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will be subject to recoupment in accordance with any clawback policy that we are required to adopt pursuant to the listing standards of any national securities exchange or association on which our securities are listed or as is otherwise required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act or other applicable law. In addition, the plan administrator may impose other clawback, recovery or recoupment provisions in an award agreement as the plan administrator determines necessary or appropriate, including a reacquisition right in respect of previously acquired shares of our common stock or other cash or property if it is determined that the participant violated non-compete, trade secret and confidentiality, or other provisions in the award agreement.

We intend to implement a Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act compliant clawback policy as soon as the SEC adopts rules that set forth the requirements for such clawback policies and as such rules become effective for us.

Executive Stock Ownership

Our Chief Executive Officer held approximately 22.70% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the Record Date. All other directors and executive officers also held shares as of the Record Date. See “Security Ownership.” Effective October 23, 2014, our Board adopted a Stock Ownership Guidelines Policy that suggests

29

minimum stock ownership guidelines for our Chief Executive Officer. The minimum stock ownership target suggested by the guidelines is based on a multiple of five times the Chief Executive Officer’s annual base salary. This policy also suggests that our Chief Executive Officer achieve the suggested minimum stock ownership target within three years of the adoption of such guidelines with respect to our current Chief Executive Officer or three years following appointment with respect to any successor. Our Chief Executive Officer’s stock ownership exceeds the suggested minimum stock ownership threshold.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

Our employment agreements with our NEOs provide for payments and other benefits in the event of termination of employment in certain circumstances. For a description of these payments and other benefits, see “Executive Compensation — Potential Payments on Termination or Change in Control” and “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2017 Elements of Executive Compensation — Amendment of Employment Agreement for Chief Executive Officer.”

We believe that these severance arrangements help us to attract and retain key management talent in an industry where there is significant competition for management talent. We believe that entering into these agreements helps the NEOs maintain continued focus and dedication to their assigned duties and helps maximize stockholder value. The terms of these agreements were determined after review by our Compensation Committee of our retention goals for each NEO, as well as analysis of market data, similar agreements established by our Select Peer Group and applicable law.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Prior to the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act discussed below, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallowed a tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1.0 million per year paid by a publicly held company to its chief executive officer or any of its three other most highly paid executive officers (other than the company’s chief financial officer). Qualifying performance-based compensation was not subject to the deduction limitation if specified requirements were met. We generally intended to structure the performance-based portion of our executive compensation, when feasible, to comply with exemptions in Section 162(m) so that the compensation remained tax deductible to us. Amounts paid under our compensation programs may be determined not to so qualify. We adopted the 162(m) Qualified MIP, which was approved by our stockholders at the 2014 annual meeting, to attempt to qualify payments made under that plan as deductible “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). We also structured the performance-based restricted stock awards with market based vesting to our NEOs in 2016 and 2017 to qualify as deductible “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m). We do not guarantee that any executive compensation intended to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) so qualifies.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which became law on December 22, 2017, generally eliminated the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m), effective January 1, 2018, subject to a special rule that “grandfathers” certain awards and arrangements that were in effect on November 2, 2017. To date, the IRS has not issued guidance interpreting the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

30

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT*

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Regulation S-K Item 402(b) (the “CD&A”) with management and based upon such review and discussion, our Compensation Committee recommended to our Board that the CD&A be included in our Proxy Statement.

31

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our “median employee” and that of our CEO, Mr. Stephen T. Winn. The pay ratio information provided below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with these new pay ratio disclosure rules.

For fiscal year 2017, our last completed fiscal year:

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that we used were as follows:

32

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The members of our Compensation Committee are set forth in “Governance — Board and Committee Governance — Board Committees.” None of the members of our Compensation Committee is an officer or employee of RealPage, was an officer or employee of RealPage during 2017, or was formerly an officer of RealPage. None of our executive officers currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Compensation Committee.

COMPENSATION TABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our NEOs during the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Additional information relevant to this table is set forth below at “Executive Compensation — Supplemental Information Regarding Arrangements with Executive Officers.”

33

2017 AND 2016 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION DETAIL

34

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of compensation in the form of plan-based awards made during 2017 to our NEOs. Additional information relevant to this table is set forth below at “Executive Compensation — Compensation Tables — Supplemental Information Regarding Arrangements with Executive Officers.”

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS