sv11
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 6, 2005
Registration
No. 333-[ ]
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form S-11
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Governing
Instruments)
17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 222
San Diego, California 92128
(858) 485-9840
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
Alan D. Gold
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 222
San Diego, California 92128
(858) 485-9840
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Scott N. Wolfe, Esq.
Craig M. Garner, Esq.
Latham & Watkins LLP
12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300
San Diego, California 92130
(858) 523-5400 |
|
Brad S. Markoff, Esq.
Christine C. Lehr, Esq.
DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP
4700 Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
(919) 786-2000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following
box. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
|
|
Amount Being |
|
Offering Price |
|
Aggregate |
|
Amount of |
Title of Securities Being Registered |
|
Registered(1) |
|
per Unit(2) |
|
Offering Price(2) |
|
Registration Fee |
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
12,650,000 shares |
|
$22.09 |
|
$279,438,500 |
|
$32,890 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 1,650,000 shares that may be purchased pursuant to
an over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. |
|
(2) |
The stock price of $22.09, which was the average of the high and
low prices of the Registrants common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange on June 2, 2005, is set forth solely for the
purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with
Rule 457(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until this
registration statement shall become effective on such date as
the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The information
in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may
not sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission becomes effective.
This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it
is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED JUNE 6, 2005
PROSPECTUS
11,000,000 Shares
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Common Stock
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust,
or REIT, focused on acquiring, developing, owning, leasing and
managing laboratory and office space for the life science
industry. Our tenants include biotechnology and pharmaceutical
companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies
and other entities involved in the life science industry. Our
current properties and our primary acquisition targets are
located in markets with well established reputations as centers
for scientific research, including Boston, San Diego,
San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania and New
York/ New Jersey. Since the completion of our initial public
offering in August 2004, when we acquired 13 properties
with an aggregate of 2.3 million rentable square feet of
laboratory and office space, we have acquired an additional 20
properties bringing our total real estate portfolio to 33
properties with an aggregate of 4.3 million rentable square
feet of laboratory and office space.
We are
offering 11,000,000 shares of our common stock in this
offering. All of the shares of our common stock offered pursuant
to this prospectus are being sold by us.
Our
common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol BMR. The last reported sale price of our
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 2, 2005
was $21.86 per share.
To
assist us in complying with certain federal income tax
requirements applicable to REITs, our charter contains certain
restrictions relating to the ownership and transfer of our
stock, including an ownership limit of 9.8% on our common
stock.
You should consider the risks that we have described in
Risk Factors beginning on page 11 before buying
shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Share | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The underwriters may purchase up to an additional
1,650,000 shares from us at the public offering price, less
the underwriting discount, within 30 days from the date of
this prospectus, to cover over-allotments.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The
underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on or
before
[ ],
2005.
The date of this prospectus is
[ ],
2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
i
ii
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information that is different from that contained in this
prospectus. We are offering to sell shares of common stock and
seeking offers to buy shares of common stock only in
jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The
information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of
the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery
of this prospectus or of any sale of the common stock.
This document is for distribution in the United Kingdom only
to persons of a kind described in Articles 19 or 49 of the
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion)
Order 2001 (as amended) or who otherwise may lawfully receive
it.
iii
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
You should read the following summary together with the more
detailed information regarding our company and the historical
and pro forma financial statements appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus, including under the caption Risk
Factors. References in this prospectus to we,
our, us and our company
refer to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation,
BioMed Realty, L.P., and any of our other subsidiaries. BioMed
Realty, L.P. is a Maryland limited partnership of which we are
the sole general partner and to which we refer in this
prospectus as our operating partnership. Unless otherwise
indicated, the information contained in this prospectus is as of
March 31, 2005 and assumes that the underwriters
over-allotment option is not exercised.
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
We are a REIT focused on acquiring, developing, owning, leasing
and managing laboratory and office space for the life science
industry. Our tenants include biotechnology and pharmaceutical
companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies
and other entities involved in the life science industry. Our
current properties and our primary acquisition targets are
located in markets with well established reputations as centers
for scientific research, including Boston, San Diego,
San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania and
New York/New Jersey.
We completed an initial public offering, or IPO, of our common
stock in August 2004 and raised net proceeds of
approximately $429.3 million. In connection with the IPO,
we acquired 13 properties with an aggregate of
2.3 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space. Since the completion of the IPO, we have acquired an
additional 20 properties with an aggregate of
2.0 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space for aggregate cash consideration of $546.9 million
and the assumption of $143.0 million of debt. As of
May 31, 2005, we owned 33 properties with an aggregate
of 4.3 million rentable square feet of laboratory and
office space. Our properties were approximately 92.2% leased to
76 tenants. Of the remaining unleased space, approximately
149,412 square feet, or 3.5% of our total rentable square
footage, was under redevelopment.
Our senior management team has significant experience in the
real estate industry, principally focusing on properties
designed for life science tenants. We operate as a fully
integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT, providing
management, leasing, development and administrative services to
our properties.
Our executive offices are located at 17140 Bernardo Center
Drive, Suite 222, San Diego, California 92128. Our
telephone number at that location is (858) 485-9840. Our
website is located at www.biomedrealty.com. The information
found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not
incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this prospectus
or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Recent Developments
On May 31, 2005, we completed the acquisition of a
portfolio of eight properties including one parking structure in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, and an additional property in Lebanon,
New Hampshire, from The Lyme Timber Company, an affiliate of
Lyme Properties. We refer to these properties as the Lyme
portfolio. The Lyme portfolio consists of ten buildings with an
aggregate of approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet
of laboratory and office space, which is currently 96.8% leased
with an average remaining term of ten years, and includes the
parking structure with 447 parking spaces. The purchase
price was $523.6 million, excluding closing costs, and was
funded through borrowings under three credit facilities with
KeyBank National Association and other lenders and the
assumption of approximately $131.2 million of indebtedness.
In order to finance the Lyme portfolio acquisition and provide
additional working capital, on May 31, 2005, we entered
into three credit facilities with KeyBank and other lenders
under which we initially borrowed $485.0 million of a total
of $600.0 million available under these facilities. The
credit facilities include a senior unsecured revolving credit
facility of $250.0 million, under which we initially
borrowed
1
$135.0 million, a senior unsecured term loan facility of
$100.0 million and a senior secured term loan facility of
$250.0 million. We borrowed the full amounts under the
senior unsecured term loan and senior secured term loan
facilities. The senior unsecured facilities have a maturity date
of May 30, 2008 and bear interest at a floating rate equal
to, at our option, either (1) reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a
spread which ranges from 120 to 200 basis points, depending
on our leverage, or (2) the higher of (a) the prime
rate then in effect plus a spread which ranges from 0 to
50 basis points and (b) the federal funds rate then in
effect plus a spread which ranges from 50 to 100 basis
points, in each case, depending on our leverage. The secured
credit facility has a maturity date of May 30, 2010 and
bears interest at a floating rate equal to, at our option,
either (1) reserve adjusted LIBOR plus 225 basis
points or (2) the higher of (a) the prime rate then in
effect plus 50 basis points and (b) the federal funds
rate then in effect plus 100 basis points and is initially
secured by 13 properties. We entered into an interest rate
swap agreement in connection with the closing of the credit
facilities, which will have the effect of fixing the interest
rate on the $250.0 million secured term loan at
approximately 6.4%.
In addition to the acquisition of the Lyme portfolio, since
March 31, 2005, we have acquired Fresh Pond Research Park,
located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Coolidge Avenue, in
Watertown, Massachusetts, Phoenixville Pike in Malvern,
Pennsylvania, Nancy Ridge Drive in San Diego and Dumbarton
Circle in Fremont, California, for aggregate cash consideration
of $56.9 million and the assumption of $7.0 million of
debt. These properties contain a total of approximately 318,640
rentable square feet of laboratory and office space.
On April 19, 2005, we entered into a lease amendment with
Centocor, Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
Under the amendment, Centocor has agreed to lease an additional
79,667 rentable square feet at our King of Prussia property
located in Radnor, Pennsylvania from May 1, 2005 through
March 31, 2010. The new lease replaces the existing portion
of the master lease with an affiliate of The Rubenstein Company,
the original seller of the property, with respect to this space.
Annualized base rent of $1.3 million and certain tenant
reimbursements received under the new lease will correspondingly
reduce the rent received under the master lease.
Our Properties
The following table presents an overview of our property
portfolio as of May 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Rentable | |
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
|
|
|
of | |
|
Square | |
|
Year Built/ | |
|
Percent | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Percent | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
|
Property Location |
|
Buildings | |
|
Feet | |
|
Renovated | |
|
Ownership | |
|
Lab Space | |
|
Leased | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
Primary Tenant |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Boston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kendall Square D(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
349,325 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
$ |
15,397 |
|
|
Genzyme Corporation |
Kendall Square A(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
302,919 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
14,536 |
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
Sidney Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
191,904 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
40 Erie Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
100,854 |
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
Fresh Pond Research Park(1)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
90,702 |
|
|
|
1948/2002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
Curis |
Albany Street
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
75,003 |
|
|
|
1922/1998 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
Millennium Pharmaceuticals |
Vassar Street(2)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
52,520 |
|
|
|
1950/1998 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
Monsanto Company |
21 Erie Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
48,238 |
|
|
|
1925/2004 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
769 |
|
|
Metabolix |
Coolidge Avenue(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
37,400 |
|
|
|
1962/1999 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
935 |
|
|
V.I. Technologies |
Lucent Drive(1)(3)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
548 |
|
|
Trustees of Dartmouth College |
47 Erie Street Parking Structure(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
Various |
New York/New Jersey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landmark at Eastview(4)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
751,648 |
|
|
|
1958/1999 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
14,105 |
|
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals |
Graphics Drive
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
72,300 |
|
|
|
1992/2001 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
148 |
|
|
Medeikon |
San Francisco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridgeview
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
263,073 |
|
|
|
1977/2002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
Cell Genesys |
Bayshore Boulevard
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
183,344 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
Intermune |
Industrial Road(5)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
171,965 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
5,480 |
|
|
Nektar Therapeutics |
Ardentech Court
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
55,588 |
|
|
|
1997/2001 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
Vicuron Pharmaceuticals |
Dumbarton Circle
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
1990 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
633 |
|
|
ARYx Therapeutics |
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Rentable | |
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
|
|
|
of | |
|
Square | |
|
Year Built/ | |
|
Percent | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Percent | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
|
Property Location |
|
Buildings | |
|
Feet | |
|
Renovated | |
|
Ownership | |
|
Lab Space | |
|
Leased | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
Primary Tenant |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King of Prussia(6)
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
427,109 |
|
|
|
1954/2004 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9,060 |
|
|
Centocor |
Phoenixville Pike
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
104,400 |
|
|
|
1989 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
783 |
|
|
Cephalon |
Eisenhower Road
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
27,750 |
|
|
|
1973/2000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
378 |
|
|
Crane Environmental |
San Diego
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towne Centre Drive(7)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
115,870 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
Illumina |
Bunker Hill Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
105,364 |
|
|
|
1973/2002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
SCVSI |
McKellar Court
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
72,863 |
|
|
|
1988 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
Quidel Corporation |
Bernardo Center Drive(9)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
61,286 |
|
|
|
1974/1992 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
University of California Regents |
Science Center Drive
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
53,740 |
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
Ligand Pharmaceuticals |
Waples Street(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
|
|
1983 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
None (under redevelopment) |
Nancy Ridge Drive
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
42,138 |
|
|
|
1983/2001 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
BioMedica |
Balboa Avenue
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
35,344 |
|
|
|
1968/2000 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
642 |
|
|
General Services Administration |
Seattle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elliott Avenue
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
134,989 |
|
|
|
1925/1984 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
5,204 |
|
|
Chiron Corporation |
Monte Villa Parkway
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
1996/2002 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
Nastech Pharmaceutical |
Maryland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tributary Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
91,592 |
|
|
|
1983/1998 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
Guilford Pharmaceuticals |
Beckley Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
77,225 |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
Guilford Pharmaceuticals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
4,255,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
$ |
109,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This property is managed by a third-party not affiliated with us. |
|
(2) |
Monsanto Company is the guarantor under the sublease of its
wholly owned subsidiary Cereon Genomics, LLC. |
|
(3) |
Located in Lebanon, New Hampshire. |
|
(4) |
We own a leasehold interest in the property through a 99-year
ground lease, which will convert into a fee simple interest upon
the completion of certain property subdivisions. |
|
(5) |
Includes rent from a lease with Nuvelo, Inc., which is expected
to commence in September 2005. |
|
(6) |
We own an 88.5% limited partnership interest and a 0.5% general
partnership interest in the limited partnership that owns this
property. |
|
(7) |
A portion of one of the buildings on this property, representing
6,600 square feet, is subleased by Illumina to an unaffiliated
third party for a period of 47 years, for which we will
receive no economic benefit. |
|
(8) |
We own the general partnership interest in the limited
partnership that owns the McKellar Court property, which
entitles us to 75% of the gains upon a sale of the property and
21% of the operating cash flows. |
|
(9) |
This property is occupied by the Centre for Health Care as a
medical office facility. Centre for Health Care, which occupies
the property with the consent of the University of California
Regents, pays the monthly rent and other obligations, but the
University of California Regents remain ultimately liable under
the lease. |
|
|
(10) |
We own 70% of the limited liability company that owns the Waples
Street property, which entitles us to 90% of the cash flow from
operations up to a 9.5% cumulative annual return, and then 75%
of such distributions thereafter. The other member of the
limited liability company has the right to put its interest to
us after completion of the initial improvements, and can require
us to issue partnership units as payment for such interest. |
In these tables and other tables throughout this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
Year built/renovated includes the year in which construction was
completed and, where applicable, the year of most recent major
renovation. |
|
|
|
Approximate percentage laboratory space is based on
managements estimates and reflects the percentage of
built-out, leased space that is considered laboratory space. |
|
|
|
Annualized base rent means the monthly contractual rent under
existing leases at May 31, 2005, or if rent has not yet
commenced, the first monthly rent payment due, multiplied by
twelve months. Includes contractual amounts to be received
pursuant to master lease agreements with the sellers on certain
properties, which are not included in rental income for GAAP. In
the case of triple-net leases, annualized base rent does not
include real estate taxes and insurance, common area and other
operating expenses, substantially all of which are borne by the
tenants. |
|
|
|
Primary tenant represents the tenant in each property that has
the highest annualized base rent. |
3
Industry Overview
The life science industry represents a large and fast growing
segment of the U.S. economy. In 2004, according to the
Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, or CMS, health care
spending grew 7.5% to an estimated $1.8 trillion, and
represented 15.4% of U.S. gross domestic product. CMS
projects that annual health care spending will grow faster than
the broader economy for the next ten years, reaching $3.6
trillion in 2014, representing 18.7% of U.S. gross domestic
product. Within the life science industry, we primarily focus on
the following tenants: biotechnology and pharmaceutical
companies, scientific research institutions and government
agencies.
Life science entities have unique and strategic location and
facility needs with respect to laboratory and office space.
Specifically, many of these entities desire properties that are
strategically located near leading academic and research
institutions and that have unique design and construction
elements necessary to accommodate their mission-critical
research, product development, clinical testing and
manufacturing activities.
We target facilities located in markets containing mature and
established centers of medical research and biotechnology
development, including Boston, San Diego,
San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania and
New York/New Jersey. According to a 2004 study by
Rosen Consulting, which we commissioned, or the Rosen Study,
these target markets have in excess of 87.0 million
rentable square feet of life science real estate, not including
owner-occupied properties. Also, according to the Rosen Study,
the average market occupancy rate for life science real estate
in these markets is seven percentage points greater than the
occupancy rate for generic office properties. These target
markets contain highly respected public and private scientific
research and medical institutions, which create demand for life
science laboratory and office space.
Investment Highlights
We believe that life science tenants have been underserved by
commercial property investors and lenders, creating a unique
market for us with significant investment opportunities. We
believe that the following factors distinguish our business
model from other owners/operators of real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Experienced management team with demonstrated track
record. Our senior executive officers have worked together
for a number of years focused on investing in properties for
lease to tenants in the life science industry. |
|
|
|
Positive life science industry trends. Based on the
long-term trends and projections for the life science industry,
we expect to see growth in revenues and research and development
spending from biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies,
scientific research institutions, government agencies and other
entities involved in the life science industry over the
foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
Quality portfolio in high barrier-to-entry markets. Our
properties are well-located in each of our primary target
markets, including Boston, San Diego, San Francisco,
Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York/ New Jersey. We
consider these properties to be high quality based on their
strategic location in our primary target markets and significant
level of improvements. |
|
|
|
Highly scalable business model. We intend to acquire
assets with triple-net leases, which will enable us to manage a
large property portfolio with a cost-effective management
infrastructure. Triple-net refers to leases where
the tenant is responsible for the payment or reimbursement of
its pro rata share of substantially all operating costs of the
property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and
utilities. Under some of the triple-net leases, we may remain
responsible for the maintenance and repair of structural
components of the building. |
|
|
|
Conservative balance sheet with growth capacity. Upon
completion of this offering, we will have $499.9 million in
total debt, resulting in a debt-to-total market capitalization
ratio of 33.5%. We believe our conservative balance sheet will
provide us with access to significant growth capital to fund
future property acquisitions. |
4
|
|
|
|
|
Strong tenant base. As of May 31, 2005, 91.6% of our
annualized base rent was derived from tenants that are public
companies or government agencies, and 33.3% of our annualized
base rent was derived from investment grade tenants (according
to Standard & Poors) or their subsidiaries. |
Summary Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the matters discussed in the
Risk Factors section beginning on page 11
before you decide whether to invest in our common stock. The
material risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
As of May 31, 2005, we had 76 tenants in
33 properties. Two of our tenants, Vertex Pharmaceuticals
and Genzyme Corporation, represented 20.7% and 14.0%,
respectively, of our annualized base rent and 14.9% and 8.7%,
respectively, of our total leased rentable square footage, and
our ten largest tenants comprised 64.0% of our annualized base
rent. To the extent we are dependent on rental payments from a
limited number of tenants, the inability of any single tenant to
make its lease payments could adversely affect us and our
ability to make distributions to stockholders. |
|
|
|
Life science entities comprise the vast majority of our tenant
base. Because of our dependence on a single industry, adverse
conditions affecting that industry will more adversely affect
our business, and thus the value of your investment in us and
our ability to make distributions to you, than if our business
strategy included a more diverse industry tenant base. |
|
|
|
Because of the unique and specific improvements required for our
life science tenants, we may be required to incur substantial
renovation costs to make our properties suitable for other life
science tenants or other office tenants, which could adversely
affect our operating performance. |
|
|
|
Ten of our properties are located in the Boston area. In
addition, 13 of our properties are located in California, with
eight in San Diego and five in San Francisco. Because
of our concentration in these geographic regions, we are
particularly vulnerable to adverse conditions affecting these
areas. In addition, we cannot assure you that these markets will
continue to grow or will remain favorable to the life science
industry. |
|
|
|
In our formation transactions, our executive officers,
Alan D. Gold, Gary A. Kreitzer, John F.
Wilson, II and Matthew G. McDevitt, and certain other
individuals contributed six properties to our operating
partnership. If we were to dispose of these contributed assets
in a taxable transaction, Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson
and McDevitt and the other contributors of those assets would
suffer adverse tax consequences. In connection with these
contribution transactions, we agreed to indemnify those
contributors against such adverse tax consequences for a period
of ten years. We have also agreed to use reasonable best efforts
consistent with our fiduciary duties to maintain at least
$8.0 million of debt, some of which must be property
specific, that the contributors can guarantee in order to defer
any taxable gain they may incur if our operating partnership
repays existing debt. These tax indemnification and debt
maintenance obligations may limit our operating flexibility. |
|
|
|
We were formed in April 2004 and have a limited operating
history as a REIT and as a public company. We cannot assure you
that our management teams past experience will be
sufficient to operate our company successfully as a REIT or as a
public company. Failure to maintain REIT status would have an
adverse effect on our cash available for distribution to
stockholders. |
|
|
|
We expect to continue to expand rapidly and may not be able to
adapt our management and operational systems to respond to the
acquisition and integration of additional properties without
unanticipated disruption or expense, which may harm our cash
flow and ability to pay distributions. |
|
|
|
We use debt to finance our property acquisitions. After we
complete this offering, we expect to have outstanding mortgage
indebtedness of $247.0 million (including unamortized debt
premium of $12.3 million) and $250.0 million of
borrowings under our secured term loan facility, secured by
13 properties, and $3.0 million of borrowings under
our senior unsecured revolving credit facility. |
5
|
|
|
|
|
We expect to incur additional debt in connection with future
acquisitions and additional borrowings under the credit
facilities. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount
or percentage of debt that we may incur. Our use of debt may
cause a material decrease in cash available for distributions. |
|
|
|
We have and may continue to enter into interest rate hedging
transactions, which may reduce our net income because they may
be unsuccessful or the counterparties to hedging transactions
may not perform their obligations. We may be unable to
effectively hedge against interest rate risks because the REIT
qualification rules require us to limit our income from hedging
transactions. |
|
|
|
We face significant competition, which may decrease or prevent
increases in our properties occupancy and rental rates and
may reduce our investment opportunities. |
|
|
|
If we experience an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of
insurance policy limits, we could lose the capital invested in
the damaged properties as well as the anticipated future cash
flows from those properties. In addition, if the damaged
properties are subject to recourse indebtedness, we would
continue to be liable for the indebtedness, even if those
properties were irreparably damaged. |
|
|
|
Our charter, the Maryland General Corporation Law, or MGCL, and
the partnership agreement of our operating partnership contain
provisions, including a 9.8% limit on ownership of our common
stock, that may delay or prevent a change of control transaction
or limit the opportunity for stockholders to receive a premium
for their common stock in such a transaction. |
|
|
|
If we ever fail to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, we will be taxed as a corporation, and our liability
for federal, state and local income taxes would significantly
increase. This would result in a material decrease in cash
available for distribution and would adversely affect the price
of our common stock. |
6
The Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
11,000,000 shares(1) |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
42,444,558 shares(2) |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect that the net proceeds of this offering will be
approximately $229.1 million after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and our expenses (and approximately
$263.6 million if the underwriters exercise their option to
purchase additional shares in full). We will contribute the net
proceeds of this offering to our operating partnership. Our
operating partnership will subsequently use the net proceeds as
follows: |
|
|
|
$100.0 million
to repay indebtedness under our senior unsecured term loan
facility, and |
|
|
|
$129.1 million
to repay indebtedness under our senior unsecured revolving
credit facility. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
BMR |
|
|
(1) |
12,650,000 shares of common stock if the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full. |
|
(2) |
44,094,558 shares of common stock if the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full. Based on the
number of shares of common stock outstanding as of May 31,
2005 and excludes (a) 2,870,564 shares issuable upon
conversion of outstanding units of our operating partnership,
(b) 2,105,442 shares available for future issuance
under our incentive award plan and (c) 270,000 shares
issuable upon exercise of a warrant issued to Raymond
James & Associates, Inc. in connection with our IPO. |
Distribution Policy
Since our IPO through March 31, 2005, we have declared
aggregate dividends on our common stock and distributions on our
operating partnership units of $0.6897 per common share and
unit, representing a full quarterly dividend for each of the
fourth quarter of 2004 and first quarter of 2005 of $0.27 per
common share and unit and a partial third quarter dividend for
2004 of $0.1497 per common share and unit. In addition, on
June 3, 2005, we declared a dividend for the second quarter
of 2005 of $0.27 per common share and unit payable to holders of
record on June 15, 2005. The dividends are equivalent to an
annual rate of $1.08 per common share and unit.
To maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required and
intend to make annual distributions to our stockholders of at
least 90% of our taxable income (which does not necessarily
equal net income as calculated in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP).
Distributions will be authorized by our board of directors and
declared by us out of funds legally available therefor based
upon a variety of factors our directors deem relevant. We cannot
assure you that our distribution policy will not change in the
future. Our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders
will depend, in part, upon our receipt of distributions from our
operating partnership, which we control, and will be based on
revenues we derive from our rental properties. Distributions to
our stockholders generally will be taxable as ordinary income to
our stockholders and will not, in most cases, be eligible for
the recently enacted 15% federal tax rate on certain
corporate dividends.
Our charter allows us to issue preferred stock with a preference
on distributions. We currently have no intention to issue any
preferred stock, but if we do, the dividend preference on the
preferred stock could limit our ability to make a dividend
distribution to our common stockholders.
7
SUMMARY SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating
data on a pro forma and historical basis for BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc., and on an historical basis for Inhale
201 Industrial Road, L.P., or 201 Industrial. We
have not presented historical information for BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. prior to August 11, 2004, the date on which we
consummated our IPO, because during the period from our
formation until our IPO we did not have any material corporate
activity and because we believe that a discussion of the results
of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. during that period would not be
meaningful.
You should read the following pro forma and historical
information in conjunction with our pro forma consolidated
financial statements and historical financial statements and
notes thereto, as well as with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
The selected historical balance sheet information as of
December 31, 2004 for BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002 for 201 Industrial, and the
historical statements of income and other data for the period
from August 11, 2004 through December 31, 2004 for
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and for the period from
January 1, 2004 through August 17, 2004 and the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 for 201 Industrial, have
been derived from our historical financial statements audited by
KPMG LLP, independent registered public accountants, whose
report with respect thereto is included elsewhere in this
prospectus, except as it relates to the historical balance sheet
information as of December 31, 2002, of 201 Industrial,
which report is not included in this prospectus.
201 Industrial is the largest property contributed to the
company in connection with our formation transactions and
therefore has been identified as the accounting acquirer
pursuant to paragraph 17 of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards, or SFAS No. 141. The
contribution of 201 Industrial as part of our formation
transactions was completed on August 17, 2004. The
contribution of the interests in all of the other contribution
properties and all acquisitions have been accounted for as a
purchase in accordance with SFAS No. 141. The
historical balance sheet information at March 31, 2005, and
the historical statement of operations and other data for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, have been
derived from the unaudited historical financial statements of
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and 201 Industrial.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data are
presented as if this offering had occurred on March 31,
2005. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of
operations and other data for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004,
are presented as if this offering, the IPO, and all acquisitions
and contributions had occurred on January 1, 2004. The
pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what
our actual financial position or results of operations would
have been as of or for the periods indicated, nor does it
purport to represent our future financial position or results of
operations.
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Period | |
|
Period | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
August 11, 2004 | |
|
January 1, 2004 | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
August 17, | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statements of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
27,695 |
|
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
111,696 |
|
|
$ |
19,432 |
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
6,275 |
|
|
$ |
5,869 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
11,853 |
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
41,142 |
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
|
|
24,471 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
154,216 |
|
|
|
28,654 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
6,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
8,529 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
33,093 |
|
|
|
10,030 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
16,453 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
42,807 |
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,357 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
26,889 |
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
102,710 |
|
|
|
22,602 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
16,147 |
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
51,506 |
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,155 |
) |
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(28,955 |
) |
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
(1,760 |
) |
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
|
|
(3,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
8,121 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
23,003 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
21,840 |
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share(3)
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share(4)
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
42,129,613 |
|
|
|
31,129,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,965,178 |
|
|
|
30,965,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
45,148,820 |
|
|
|
34,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,767,575 |
|
|
|
33,767,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental properties, net
|
|
$ |
1,035,489 |
|
|
$ |
489,136 |
|
|
$ |
79,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
468,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,025 |
|
|
$ |
47,853 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,226,780 |
|
|
|
601,617 |
|
|
|
84,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,056 |
|
|
|
50,732 |
|
Mortgages and other secured loans
|
|
|
496,982 |
|
|
|
101,594 |
|
|
|
64,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,208 |
|
|
|
37,743 |
|
Unsecured line of credit
|
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
557,233 |
|
|
|
159,258 |
|
|
|
69,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,597 |
|
|
|
38,563 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity and partners capital
|
|
|
647,061 |
|
|
|
419,873 |
|
|
|
15,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
12,169 |
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
1,226,780 |
|
|
|
601,617 |
|
|
|
84,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,056 |
|
|
|
50,732 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations(5)
|
|
$ |
19,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,959 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456,680 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,433 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Represents the results and financial position of the Predecessor
for the three months ended March 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Consolidated and combined cash flow information of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and the Predecessor for the year ended
December 31, 2004. |
|
(3) |
Basic earnings per share equals net income divided by the number
of shares of our common stock outstanding excluding the weighted
average of the number of unvested shares of restricted stock.
Pro-forma basic earnings per share is computed assuming this
offering was consummated as of the first day of the period
presented. |
|
(4) |
Diluted earnings per share equals pro forma net income divided
by the sum of the number of shares of our common stock
outstanding excluding the weighted average number of unvested
shares of restricted stock, plus an amount computed using the
treasury stock method with respect to the unvested shares of our
restricted stock. Pro-forma diluted earnings per share is
computed assuming this offering was consummated as of the first
day of the period presented. |
|
(5) |
As defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts, or NAREIT, funds from operations, or FFO, represents net
income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or
losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related
depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of loan
origination costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures. We present FFO because we
consider it an important |
9
|
|
|
supplemental measure of our
operating performance and believe it is frequently used by
securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in
the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when
reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP
historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and
related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate
assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real
estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions.
Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to
real estate, gains and losses from property dispositions and
extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that,
when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations
from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs,
development activities and interest costs, providing perspective
not immediately apparent from net income. We compute FFO in
accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors
of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as amended in November
1999 and April 2002), which may differ from the methodology for
calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly,
may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not
represent amounts available for managements discretionary
use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt
service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. FFO
should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss)
(computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our
financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities
(computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our
liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our
cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make
distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reconciliation of Pro Forma Funds from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
$ |
21,840 |
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma minority interests
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
Pro forma real estate depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
42,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma funds from operations
|
|
$ |
19,348 |
|
|
$ |
66,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves risks. In addition
to other information contained in this prospectus, you should
carefully consider the following factors before acquiring shares
of our common stock offered by this prospectus. The occurrence
of any of the following risks might cause you to lose all or a
part of your investment. Some statements in this prospectus,
including statements in the following risk factors, constitute
forward-looking statements. Please refer to the section entitled
Forward-Looking Statements.
Risks Related to Our Properties, Our Business and Our Growth
Strategy
Because we lease our properties to a limited number of
tenants, and to the extent we depend on a limited number of
tenants in the future, the inability of any single tenant to
make its lease payments could adversely affect our business and
our ability to make distributions to you.
As of May 31, 2005, we had 76 tenants in 33 properties. Two
of our tenants, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Genzyme Corporation,
represented 20.7% and 14.0%, respectively, of our annualized
base rent, and 14.9% and 8.7%, respectively, of our total leased
rentable square footage, and our ten largest tenants comprised
64.0% of our annualized base rent. While we evaluate the
creditworthiness of our tenants by reviewing available financial
and other pertinent information, there can be no assurance that
any tenant will be able to make timely rental payments or avoid
defaulting under its lease. If a tenant defaults, we may
experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may
incur substantial costs in protecting our investment. Because we
depend on rental payments from a limited number of tenants, the
inability of any single tenant to make its lease payments could
adversely affect us and our ability to make distributions to you.
Tenants in the life science industry face high levels of
regulation, expense and uncertainty that may adversely affect
their ability to pay us rent and consequently adversely affect
our business.
Life science entities comprise the vast majority of our tenant
base. Because of our dependence on a single industry, adverse
conditions affecting that industry will more adversely affect
our business, and thus our ability to make distributions to you,
than if our business strategy included a more diverse tenant
base. Life science industry tenants, particularly those involved
in developing and marketing drugs and drug delivery
technologies, fail from time to time as a result of various
factors. Many of these factors are particular to the life
science industry. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
Our tenants require significant outlays of funds for the
research and development and clinical testing of their products
and technologies. If private investors, the government or other
sources of funding are unavailable to support such development,
a tenants business may fail. |
|
|
|
The research and development, clinical testing, manufacture and
marketing of some of our tenants products require federal,
state and foreign regulatory approvals. The approval process is
typically long, expensive and uncertain. Even if our tenants
have sufficient funds to seek approvals, one or all of their
products may fail to obtain the required regulatory approvals on
a timely basis or at all. Furthermore, our tenants may only have
a small number of products under development. If one product
fails to receive the required approvals at any stage of
development, it could significantly adversely affect our
tenants entire business and its ability to pay rent. |
|
|
|
Our tenants with marketable products may be adversely affected
by health care reform efforts and the reimbursement policies of
government or private health care payors. |
|
|
|
Our tenants may be unable to adequately protect their
intellectual property under patent, copyright or trade secret
laws. Failure to do so could jeopardize their ability to profit
from their efforts and to protect their products from
competition. |
|
|
|
Collaborative relationships with other life science entities may
be crucial to the development, manufacturing, distribution or
marketing of our tenants products. If these other entities
fail to fulfill their obligations under these collaborative
arrangements, our tenants businesses will suffer. |
11
We cannot assure you that our tenants in the life science
industry will be successful in their businesses. If our
tenants businesses are adversely affected, they may have
difficulty paying us rent.
Because particular upgrades are required for life science
tenants, improvements to our properties involve greater
expenditures than traditional office space, which costs may not
be covered by the rents our tenants pay.
The improvements generally required for our properties
infrastructure are more costly than for other property types.
Typical infrastructural improvements include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
reinforced concrete floors, |
|
|
|
upgraded roof structures for greater load capacity, |
|
|
|
increased floor-to-ceiling clear heights, |
|
|
|
heavy-duty HVAC systems, |
|
|
|
enhanced environmental control technology, |
|
|
|
significantly upgraded electrical, gas and plumbing
infrastructure, and |
|
|
|
laboratory benchwork. |
Our tenants generally pay higher rent on our properties than
tenants in traditional office space. However, we cannot assure
you that our tenants will continue to do so in the future or
that the rents paid will cover the additional costs of upgrading
the properties.
Because of the unique and specific improvements required for
our life science tenants, we may be required to incur
substantial renovation costs to make our properties suitable for
other life science tenants or other office tenants, which could
adversely affect our operating performance.
We acquire or develop properties that include laboratory space
and other features that we believe are generally desirable for
life science industry tenants. However, different life science
industry tenants may require different features in their
properties, depending on each tenants particular focus
within the life science industry. If a current tenant is unable
to pay rent and vacates a property, we may incur substantial
expenditures to modify the property before we are able to
re-lease the space to another life science industry tenant. This
could hurt our operating performance and the value of your
investment. Also, if the property needs to be renovated to
accommodate multiple tenants, we may incur substantial
expenditures before we are able to re-lease the space.
Additionally, our properties may not be suitable for lease to
traditional office tenants without significant expenditures or
renovations. Accordingly, any downturn in the life science
industry may have a substantial negative impact on our
properties values.
The geographic concentration of our properties in Boston and
California makes our business particularly vulnerable to adverse
conditions affecting these markets.
Ten of our 33 properties are located in the Boston area. As of
May 31, 2005, these properties represented 43.2% of our
annualized base rent and 31.1% of our total leased rentable
square footage. In addition, 13 of our 33 properties are located
in California, with eight in San Diego and five in
San Francisco. As of May 31, 2005, these properties
represented 25.9% of our annualized base rent and 28.3% of our
total leased rentable square footage. Because of this
concentration in two geographic regions, we are particularly
vulnerable to adverse conditions affecting Boston and
California, including general economic conditions, increased
competition, a downturn in the local life science industry, real
estate conditions, terrorist attacks, earthquakes (with respect
to California) and other natural disasters occurring in these
regions. In addition, we cannot assure you that these markets
will continue to grow or remain favorable to the life science
industry. The performance of the life science industry and the
economy in general in these geographic markets may affect
occupancy, market rental rates and expenses, and thus may affect
our performance and the value of our properties. We are also
subject to greater risk of loss from
12
earthquakes because of our properties concentration in
California. The close proximity of our five properties in
San Francisco to a fault line makes them more vulnerable to
earthquakes than properties in many other parts of the country.
Our tax indemnification and debt maintenance obligations
require us to make payments if we sell certain properties or
repay certain debt, which could limit our operating
flexibility.
In our formation transactions, our executive officers, Alan D.
Gold, Gary A. Kreitzer, John F. Wilson, II and Matthew G.
McDevitt, and certain other individuals contributed six
properties to our operating partnership. If we were to dispose
of these contributed assets in a taxable transaction,
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt and the other
contributors of those assets would suffer adverse tax
consequences. In connection with these contribution
transactions, we agreed to indemnify those contributors against
such adverse tax consequences for a period of ten years. This
indemnification will help those contributors to preserve their
tax positions after their contributions. The tax indemnification
provisions were not negotiated in an arms length
transaction but were determined by our management team. We have
also agreed to use reasonable best efforts consistent with our
fiduciary duties to maintain at least $8.0 million of debt,
some of which must be property specific, that the contributors
can guarantee in order to defer any taxable gain they may incur
if our operating partnership repays existing debt. These tax
indemnification and debt maintenance obligations may affect the
way in which we conduct our business. During the indemnification
period, these obligations may impact the timing and
circumstances under which we sell the contributed properties or
interests in entities holding the properties. For example, these
tax indemnification payments could effectively reduce or
eliminate any gain we might otherwise realize upon the sale or
other disposition of the related properties. Accordingly, even
if market conditions might otherwise dictate that it would be
desirable to dispose of these properties, the existence of the
tax indemnification obligations could result in a decision to
retain the properties in our portfolio to avoid having to pay
the tax indemnity payments. The existence of the debt
maintenance obligations could require us to maintain debt at a
higher level than we might otherwise choose. Higher debt levels
could adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
While we may seek to enter into tax-efficient joint ventures
with third party investors, we currently have no intention of
disposing of these properties or interests in entities holding
the properties in transactions that would trigger our tax
indemnification obligations. The involuntary condemnation of one
or more of these properties during the indemnification period
could, however, trigger the tax indemnification obligations
described above. The tax indemnity would equal the amount of the
federal and state income tax liability the contributor would
incur with respect to the gain allocated to the contributor. The
calculation of the indemnity payment would not be reduced due to
the time value of money or the time remaining within the
indemnification period. The terms of the contribution agreements
also require us to gross up the tax indemnity payment for the
amount of income taxes due as a result of the tax indemnity
payment. Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt are
potential recipients of these indemnification payments. Because
of these potential payments their personal interests may diverge
from those of our stockholders.
We have a limited operating history as a REIT and as a public
company and may not be successful in operating as a public REIT,
which may adversely affect our ability to make distributions to
stockholders.
We were formed in April 2004 and have a limited operating
history as a REIT and as a public company. Our board of
directors and executive officers have overall responsibility for
our management, but only our Chief Executive Officer, Executive
Vice President and one of our independent directors have prior
experience in operating a business in accordance with the
requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,
or the Code, for maintaining qualification as a REIT. We cannot
assure you that our management teams past experience will
be sufficient to operate our company successfully as a REIT or
as a public company. Failure to maintain REIT status would have
an adverse effect on our cash available for distribution to
stockholders and would adversely affect the price of our common
stock.
13
Our expansion strategy may not yield the returns expected,
may result in disruptions to our business, may strain our
management resources and may adversely affect our operations.
We own properties in Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle,
Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York/ New Jersey, each of which
is currently a leading market in the United States for the life
science industry. We cannot assure you that these markets will
remain favorable to the life science industry, that these
markets will continue to grow or that we will be successful
expanding in these markets.
In addition to the 13 properties we acquired at our IPO, we have
acquired an additional 20 properties, and we expect to continue
to expand. This anticipated growth will require substantial
attention from our existing management team, which may divert
managements attention from our current properties.
Implementing our growth plan will also require that we expand
our management and staff with qualified and experienced
personnel and that we implement administrative, accounting and
operational systems sufficient to integrate new properties into
our portfolio. We also must manage future property acquisitions
without incurring unanticipated costs or disrupting the
operations at our existing properties. Managing new properties
requires a focus on leasing and retaining tenants. If we fail to
successfully integrate future acquisitions into our portfolio,
or if newly acquired properties fail to perform as we expect,
our results of operations, financial condition and ability to
pay distributions could suffer.
We may be unable to acquire, develop or operate new
properties successfully, which could harm our financial
condition and ability to pay distributions to you.
We continue to evaluate the market for available properties and
may acquire office, laboratory and other properties when
opportunities exist. We also may develop or substantially
renovate office and other properties. Acquisition, development
and renovation activities are subject to significant risks,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
changing market conditions, including competition from others,
may diminish our opportunities for acquiring a desired property
on favorable terms or at all. Even if we enter into agreements
for the acquisition of properties, these agreements are subject
to customary conditions to closing, including completion of due
diligence investigations to our satisfaction, |
|
|
|
we may be unable to obtain financing on favorable terms (or at
all), |
|
|
|
we may spend more time or money than we budget to improve or
renovate acquired properties or to develop new properties, |
|
|
|
we may be unable to quickly and efficiently integrate new
properties, particularly if we acquire portfolios of properties,
into our existing operations, |
|
|
|
market conditions may result in higher than expected vacancy
rates and lower than expected rental rates, |
|
|
|
if we develop properties, we may encounter delays or refusals in
obtaining all necessary zoning, land use, building, occupancy
and other required governmental permits and authorizations, |
|
|
|
we are less familiar with the development of properties in
markets outside of California, |
|
|
|
acquired and developed properties may have defects we do not
discover through our inspection processes, including latent
defects that may not reveal themselves until many years after we
put a property in service, and |
|
|
|
we may acquire land, properties or entities owning properties
which are subject to liabilities and for which, in the case of
unknown liabilities, we may have limited or no recourse. |
The realization of any of the above risks could significantly
and adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common
stock, ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and
ability to pay distributions to you.
14
Our success depends on key personnel with extensive
experience dealing with the real estate needs of life science
tenants, and the loss of these key personnel could threaten our
ability to operate our business successfully.
Our future success depends, to a significant extent, on the
continued services of our management team. In particular, we
depend on the efforts of Mr. Gold, our Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kreitzer, our Executive
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Mr. Wilson,
our Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. McDevitt, our Vice
President, Acquisitions. Among the reasons that
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt are important
to our success is that each has a national or regional
reputation in the life science industry based on their extensive
real estate experience in dealing with life science tenants and
properties. Each member of our management team has developed
informal relationships through past business dealings with
numerous members of the scientific community, life science
investors, current and prospective life science industry
tenants, and real estate brokers. We expect that their
reputations will attract business and investment opportunities
before the active marketing of properties and will assist us in
negotiations with lenders, existing and potential tenants, and
industry personnel. If we lost their services, our relationships
with such lenders, existing and prospective tenants, and
industry personnel could suffer. We have entered into employment
agreements with each of Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and
McDevitt, but we cannot guarantee that they will not terminate
their employment prior to the end of the term.
The bankruptcy of a tenant may adversely affect the income
produced by and the value of our properties.
The bankruptcy or insolvency of a tenant may adversely affect
the income produced by our properties. If any tenant becomes a
debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code, we cannot evict the
tenant solely because of the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court
also might authorize the tenant to reject and terminate its
lease with us, which would generally result in any unpaid,
pre-bankruptcy rent being treated as an unsecured claim. In
addition, our claim against the tenant for unpaid, future rent
would be subject to a statutory cap equal to the greater of
(1) one year of rent or (2) 15% of the remaining rent
on the lease (not to exceed three years of rent). This cap might
be substantially less than the remaining rent actually owed
under the lease. Additionally, a Bankruptcy Court may require us
to turn over to the estate all or a portion of any deposits,
amounts in escrow, or prepaid rents. Our claim for unpaid,
pre-bankruptcy rent, our lease termination damages and claims
relating to damages for which we hold deposits or other amounts
that we were forced to repay would likely not be paid in full.
Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance
and public disclosure may result in additional expenses and may
have a negative impact on our business.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and new rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE,
are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. These new
or changed laws, regulations and standards are subject to
varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of
specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may
evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and
governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty
regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by
ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our
efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards
have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in,
increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of
management time and attention from revenue-generating activities
to compliance activities. In particular, our efforts to comply
with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the
related regulations regarding our required assessment of our
internal control over financial reporting and our external
auditors audit of that assessment has required the
commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. We
expect these efforts to require the continued commitment of
significant resources. Further, our board members, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer could face an
increased risk of personal liability in connection with the
performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty
attracting and retaining qualified board members and executive
officers, which could harm our business. If our efforts
15
to comply with new or changed laws, regulations and standards
differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing
bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, our reputation
may be harmed.
Future acts of terrorism or war or the risk of war may have a
negative impact on our business.
The continued threat of terrorism and the potential for military
action and heightened security measures in response to this
threat may cause significant disruption to commerce. There can
be no assurance that the armed hostilities will not escalate or
that these terrorist attacks, or the United States
responses to them, will not lead to further acts of terrorism
and civil disturbances, which may further contribute to economic
instability. Any armed conflict, civil unrest or additional
terrorist activities, and the attendant political instability
and societal disruption, may adversely affect our results of
operations, financial condition and future growth.
Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry
Significant competition may decrease or prevent increases in
our properties occupancy and rental rates and may reduce
our investment opportunities.
We are one of only two publicly traded entities focusing
primarily on the acquisition, management, expansion and
selective development of properties designed for life science
tenants. However, various entities, including other REITs, such
as health care REITs and suburban office property REITs, pension
funds, insurance companies, investment funds and companies,
partnerships, and developers invest in properties containing
life science tenants and therefore compete for investment
opportunities with us. Many of these entities have substantially
greater financial resources than we do and may be able to accept
more risk than we can prudently manage, including risks with
respect to the creditworthiness of a tenant or the geographic
location of its investments. In the future, competition from
these entities may reduce the number of suitable investment
opportunities offered to us or increase the bargaining power of
property owners seeking to sell. Further, as a result of their
greater resources, those entities may have more flexibility than
we do in their ability to offer rental concessions to attract
tenants. This could put pressure on our ability to maintain or
raise rents and could adversely affect our ability to attract or
retain tenants. As a result, our financial condition, results of
operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common
stock, ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and
ability to pay distributions to you may be adversely affected.
Uninsured and underinsured losses could adversely affect our
operating results and our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders.
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, workers
compensation, extended coverage, terrorism and rental loss
insurance covering all of our properties under a blanket policy,
except with respect to property and fire insurance on our
McKellar Court and Science Center Drive properties, which is
carried directly by the tenants. We believe the policy
specifications and insured limits are appropriate given the
relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry
practice. We also carry environmental remediation insurance for
our properties. This insurance, subject to certain exclusions
and deductibles, covers the cost to remediate environmental
damage caused by unintentional future spills or the historic
presence of previously undiscovered hazardous substances. We
intend to carry similar insurance with respect to future
acquisitions as appropriate. We do not carry insurance for
generally uninsurable losses such as loss from riots or acts of
God. A substantial portion of our properties are located in
San Diego and San Francisco, California, areas
especially subject to earthquakes. We presently carry earthquake
insurance on our Industrial Road property in San Francisco
but do not carry earthquake insurance on our other properties in
San Francisco or San Diego. The amount of earthquake
insurance coverage we do carry may not be sufficient to fully
cover losses from earthquakes. In addition, we may discontinue
earthquake, terrorism or other insurance, or may elect not to
procure such insurance, on some or all of our properties in the
future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies
exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted
for the risk of loss.
If we experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds policy
limits, we could lose the capital invested in the damaged
properties as well as the anticipated future cash flows from
those properties. In
16
addition, if the damaged properties are subject to recourse
indebtedness, we would continue to be liable for the
indebtedness, even if these properties were irreparably damaged.
Our performance and value are subject to risks associated
with the ownership and operation of real estate assets and with
factors affecting the real estate industry.
Our ability to make expected distributions to our stockholders
depends on our ability to generate revenues in excess of
expenses, our scheduled principal payments on debt and our
capital expenditure requirements. Events and conditions that are
beyond our control may decrease our cash available for
distribution and the value of our properties. These events
include:
|
|
|
|
|
local oversupply, increased competition or reduced demand for
life science office and laboratory space, |
|
|
|
inability to collect rent from tenants, |
|
|
|
vacancies or our inability to rent space on favorable terms, |
|
|
|
increased operating costs, including insurance premiums,
utilities and real estate taxes, |
|
|
|
the ongoing need for capital improvements, particularly in older
structures, |
|
|
|
costs of complying with changes in governmental regulations,
including tax laws, |
|
|
|
the relative illiquidity of real estate investments, |
|
|
|
changing submarket demographics, and |
|
|
|
civil unrest, acts of war and natural disasters, including
earthquakes, floods and fires, which may result in uninsured and
underinsured losses. |
In addition, we could experience a general decline in rents or
an increased incidence of defaults under existing leases if any
of the following occur:
|
|
|
|
|
periods of economic slowdown or recession, |
|
|
|
rising interest rates, |
|
|
|
declining demand for real estate, or |
|
|
|
the public perception that any of these events may occur. |
Any of these events could adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations, cash flow, per share trading
price of our common stock, ability to satisfy our debt service
obligations and ability to pay distributions to you.
Illiquidity of real estate investments may make it difficult
for us to sell properties in response to market conditions and
could harm our financial condition and ability to make
distributions.
Equity real estate investments are relatively illiquid and
therefore will tend to limit our ability to vary our portfolio
promptly in response to changing economic or other conditions.
To the extent the properties are not subject to triple-net
leases, some significant expenditures such as real estate taxes
and maintenance costs are generally not reduced when
circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investment.
Should these events occur, our income and funds available for
distribution could be adversely affected. Furthermore, our
Landmark at Eastview property is subject to a ground lease until
certain property subdivisions are completed, at which time the
ground lease will terminate and we will obtain fee simple title
to the property. If those subdivisions are not completed, the
property will remain subject to the ground lease, which could
make it more difficult to sell the property. If any of the
parking leases or licenses associated with the Lyme portfolio
were to expire, or if we were unable to assign these leases to a
buyer, it would be more difficult for us to sell these
properties and would adversely affect our ability to retain
current tenants or attract new tenants at these properties. In
addition, REIT requirements may subject us to confiscatory taxes
on gain recognized from the sale of property if the property is
considered
17
to be held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary
course of our business. To prevent these taxes, we may comply
with safe harbor rules relating to the number of properties sold
in a year, how long we owned the properties, their tax bases and
the cost of improvements made to those properties. However, we
can provide no assurance that we will be able to successfully
comply with these safe harbors. If compliance is possible, the
safe harbor rules may restrict our ability to sell assets in the
future and achieve liquidity that may be necessary to fund
distributions.
We may be unable to renew leases, lease vacant space or
re-lease space as leases expire, which could adversely affect
our business and our ability to pay distributions to you.
If we cannot renew leases, we may be unable to re-lease our
properties at rates equal to or above the current rate. Even if
we can renew leases, tenants may be able to negotiate lower
rates as a result of market conditions. Market conditions may
also hinder our ability to lease vacant space in newly developed
properties. In addition, we may enter into or acquire leases for
properties that are specially suited to the needs of a
particular tenant. Such properties may require renovations,
tenant improvements or other concessions in order to lease them
to other tenants if the initial leases terminate. Any of these
factors could adversely impact our financial condition, results
of operations, cash flow, per share trading price of our common
stock, our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and
our ability to pay distributions to you.
We could incur significant costs related to government
regulation and private litigation over environmental matters
involving the presence, discharge or threat of discharge of
hazardous or toxic substances, which could adversely affect our
operations, the value of our properties, and our ability to make
distributions to you.
Our properties may be subject to environmental liabilities.
Under various federal, state and local laws, a current or
previous owner, operator or tenant of real estate can face
liability for environmental contamination created by the
presence, discharge or threat of discharge of hazardous or toxic
substances. Liabilities can include the cost to investigate,
clean up and monitor the actual or threatened contamination and
damages caused by the contamination (or threatened
contamination). Environmental laws typically impose such
liability regardless of:
|
|
|
|
|
our knowledge of the contamination, |
|
|
|
the timing of the contamination, |
|
|
|
the cause of the contamination, or |
|
|
|
the party responsible for the contamination. |
The liability under such laws may be strict, joint and several,
meaning that we may be liable regardless of whether we knew of,
or were responsible for, the presence of the contaminants, and
the government entity or private party may seek recovery of the
entire amount from us even if there are other responsible
parties. Liabilities associated with environmental conditions
may be significant and can sometimes exceed the value of the
affected property. The presence of hazardous substances on a
property may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent that
property or to borrow using that property as collateral.
Some of our properties have had contamination in the past that
required cleanup. We believe the contamination has been
effectively remediated, and that any remaining contamination
either does not require remediation or that the costs associated
with such remediation will not be material. However, we cannot
guarantee that such contamination does not continue to pose a
threat to the environment or that we will not have continued
liability in connection with such prior contamination. Our
Kendall Square A and Kendall Square D properties are
located on the site of a former manufactured gas plant. Various
remedial actions were performed on these properties, including
soil stabilization to control the spread of oil and hazardous
materials in the soil. Another of our properties, Elliott
Avenue, has known soil contamination beneath a portion of the
building located on the property. Based on environmental
consultant reports, management does not believe any remediation
would be required unless major structural changes were made to
the building that resulted in the soil becoming exposed. We do
not expect these matters to
18
materially adversely affect such properties value or the
cash flows related to such properties, but we can provide no
assurances to that effect.
Environmental laws also:
|
|
|
|
|
may require the removal or upgrade of underground storage tanks, |
|
|
|
regulate storm water, wastewater and water pollutant discharge, |
|
|
|
regulate air pollutant emissions, |
|
|
|
regulate hazardous materials generation, management and
disposal, and |
|
|
|
regulate workplace health and safety. |
Life science industry tenants, our primary tenant industry
focus, frequently use hazardous materials, chemicals, heavy
metals, and biological and radioactive compounds. Our
tenants controlled use of these materials subjects us and
our tenants to laws that govern using, manufacturing, storing,
handling and disposing of such materials and certain byproducts
of those materials. We are unaware of any of our existing
tenants violating applicable laws and regulations, but we and
our tenants cannot completely eliminate the risk of
contamination or injury from these materials. If our properties
become contaminated, or if a party is injured, we could be held
liable for any damages that result. Such liability could exceed
our resources and any environmental remediation insurance
coverage we have, which could adversely affect our operations,
the value of our properties, and our ability to make
distributions to you.
We could incur significant costs related to governmental
regulation and private litigation over environmental matters
involving asbestos-containing materials, which could adversely
affect our operations, the value of our properties, and our
ability to make distributions to you.
Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance and
removal of asbestos-containing materials, or ACMs, and may
impose fines and penalties if we fail to comply with these
requirements. Failure to comply with these laws, or even the
presence of ACMs, may expose us to third-party liability. Some
of our properties contain ACMs, and we could be liable for such
fines or penalties, as described below in Business and
Properties Regulation Environmental
Matters.
Our properties may contain or develop harmful mold, which
could lead to liability for adverse health effects and costs of
remediating the problem, which could adversely affect the value
of the affected property and our ability to make distributions
to you.
When excessive moisture accumulates in buildings or on building
materials, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture
problem remains undiscovered or is not addressed over a period
of time. Some molds may produce airborne toxins or irritants.
Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing
because exposure to mold may cause a variety of adverse health
effects and symptoms, including allergic or other reactions. As
a result, the presence of significant mold at any of our
properties could require us to undertake a costly remediation
program to contain or remove the mold from the affected
property. In addition, the presence of significant mold could
expose us to liability to our tenants, their or our employees,
and others if property damage or health concerns arise.
Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
similar laws may require us to make significant unanticipated
expenditures.
All of our properties are required to comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, or the ADA. The ADA
requires that all public accommodations must meet federal
requirements related to access and use by disabled persons.
Although we believe that our properties substantially comply
with present requirements of the ADA, we have not conducted an
audit of all of such properties to determine compliance. If one
or more properties is not in compliance with the ADA, then we
would be required to bring the offending properties into
compliance. Compliance with the ADA could require removing
access barriers. Non-compliance could result in imposition of
fines by the U.S. government or an award of damages to
private litigants, or both. Additional federal, state and local
laws also may require us
19
to modify properties or could restrict our ability to renovate
properties. Complying with the ADA or other legislation could be
very expensive. If we incur substantial costs to comply with
such laws, our financial condition, results of operations, cash
flow, per share trading price of our common stock, our ability
to satisfy our debt service obligations and our ability to pay
distributions to you could be adversely affected.
We may incur significant unexpected costs to comply with
fire, safety and other regulations, which could adversely impact
our financial condition, results of operations, and ability to
make distributions.
Our properties are subject to various federal, state and local
regulatory requirements, such as state and local fire and safety
requirements, building codes and land use regulations. Failure
to comply with these requirements could subject us to
governmental fines or private litigant damage awards. We believe
that our properties are currently in material compliance with
all applicable regulatory requirements. However, we do not know
whether existing requirements will change or whether future
requirements will require us to make significant unanticipated
expenditures that will adversely impact our financial condition,
results of operations, cash flow, the per share trading price of
our common stock, our ability to satisfy our debt service
obligations and our ability to pay distributions to you.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
Conflicts of interest could result in our management acting
other than in our stockholders best interests.
Our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
beneficially owns 4.4% of our common stock on a fully diluted
basis and exercises substantial influence over our business and,
as a result, he may delay, defer or prevent us from taking
actions that would be beneficial to our other
stockholders. As of May 31, 2005, Mr. Gold,
our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer,
beneficially owned 136,867 shares of our common stock and
units which may be exchanged for 1,320,780 shares of our
common stock, representing a total of approximately 4.4% of our
outstanding common stock, or approximately 3.3% of our
outstanding common stock upon completion of this offering.
Consequently, Mr. Gold has substantial influence over us
and could exercise his influence in a manner that may not be in
the best interests of our stockholders.
We may choose not to enforce, or to enforce less
vigorously, our rights under contribution and other agreements
because of conflicts of interest with certain of our
officers. Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and
McDevitt, some of their spouses and parents, and other
individuals and entities not affiliated with us or our
management, had ownership interests in the properties
contributed to our operating partnership in our formation
transactions. Under the agreements relating to the contribution
of those interests, we are entitled to indemnification and
damages in the event of breaches of representations or
warranties made by Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and
McDevitt and other contributors. In addition, Messrs. Gold,
Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt have entered into employment
agreements with us pursuant to which they have agreed to devote
substantially full-time attention to our affairs. None of these
contribution and employment agreements were negotiated on an
arms-length basis. We may choose not to enforce, or to
enforce less vigorously, our rights under these contribution and
employment agreements because of our desire to maintain our
ongoing relationships with the individuals involved.
Our charter and Maryland law contain provisions that may
delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction and may
prevent stockholders from receiving a premium for their
shares.
Our charter contains a 9.8% ownership limit that may
delay, defer or prevent a change of control transaction.
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors
to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve
our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted by our board of
directors, no person may own more than 9.8% of the value of our
outstanding shares of capital stock or more than 9.8% in value
or number (whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding
shares of our common stock. The board may not grant such an
exemption to any proposed transferee whose ownership of in
excess of 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares would
result in the termination of our status as a REIT. These
restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if
our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our
best interests to attempt to qualify as a REIT. The ownership
limit
20
may delay or impede a transaction or a change of control that
might involve a premium price for our common stock or otherwise
be in the best interest of our stockholders.
We could authorize and issue stock without stockholder
approval that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control
transaction. Our charter authorizes us to issue
additional authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or
preferred stock. In addition, our board of directors may
classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock
or preferred stock and may set the preferences, rights and other
terms of the classified or reclassified shares. The board may
also, without stockholder approval, amend our charter to
increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock or
our preferred stock that we may issue. The board of directors
could establish a series of common stock or preferred stock that
could, depending on the terms of such series, delay, defer or
prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve
a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best
interests of our stockholders.
Certain provisions of Maryland law could inhibit changes
in control that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control
transaction. Certain provisions of the MGCL may have the
effect of inhibiting a third party from making a proposal to
acquire us or of impeding a change of control. In some cases,
such an acquisition or change of control could provide you with
the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing
market price of your shares. These MGCL provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
business combination provisions that, subject to
limitations, prohibit certain business combinations between us
and an interested stockholder for certain periods.
An interested stockholder is generally any person
who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our
shares or an affiliate thereof. The business combinations are
prohibited for five years after the most recent date on which
the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. After that
period, the MGCL imposes special voting requirements on such
combinations, and |
|
|
|
control share provisions that provide that
control shares of our company acquired in a
control share acquisition have no voting rights
unless holders of two-thirds of our voting stock (excluding
interested shares) consent. Control shares are
shares that, when aggregated with other shares controlled by the
stockholder, entitle the stockholder to exercise one of three
increasing ranges of voting power in electing directors. A
control share acquisition is the direct or indirect
acquisition of ownership or control of control
shares. |
We have opted out of these provisions of the MGCL. In the case
of the business combination provisions of the MGCL, we opted out
by resolution of our board of directors with respect to any
business combination between us and any person provided such
business combination is first approved by our board of directors
(including a majority of directors who are not affiliates or
associates of such person). In the case of the control share
provisions of the MGCL, we opted out pursuant to a provision in
our bylaws. However, our board of directors may by resolution
elect to opt in to the business combination provisions of the
MGCL. Further, we may opt in to the control share provisions of
the MGCL in the future by amending our bylaws, which our board
of directors can do without stockholder approval.
The partnership agreement, Maryland law, and our charter and
bylaws also contain other provisions that may delay, defer or
prevent a transaction or a change of control that might involve
a premium price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best
interest of our stockholders.
Our board of directors may amend our investing and financing
policies without stockholder approval, and, accordingly, you
would have limited control over changes in our policies that
could increase the risk we default under our debt obligations or
that could harm our business, results of operations and share
price.
Our board of directors has adopted a policy of limiting our
indebtedness to approximately 60% of our total market
capitalization. Total market capitalization is defined as the
sum of the market value of our outstanding common stock (which
may decrease, thereby increasing our debt-to-total
capitalization ratio), plus the aggregate value of operating
partnership units we do not own, plus the book value of our
total consolidated indebtedness. However, our organizational
documents do not limit the amount or percentage
21
of debt that we may incur, nor do they limit the types of
properties we may acquire or develop. Our board of directors may
alter or eliminate our current policy on borrowing or investing
at any time without stockholder approval. Changes in our
strategy or in our investment or leverage policies could expose
us to greater credit risk and interest rate risk and could also
result in a more leveraged balance sheet. These factors could
result in an increase in our debt service and could adversely
affect our cash flow and our ability to make expected
distributions to you. Higher leverage also increases the risk we
would default on our debt.
We may invest in properties with other entities, and our lack
of sole decision-making authority or reliance on a
co-venturers financial condition could make these joint
venture investments risky.
We have in the past and may continue in the future to co-invest
with third parties through partnerships, joint ventures or other
entities. We may acquire non-controlling interests or share
responsibility for managing the affairs of a property,
partnership, joint venture or other entity. In such events, we
would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making
authority regarding the property or entity. Investments in
entities may, under certain circumstances, involve risks not
present were a third party not involved. These risks include the
possibility that partners or co-venturers:
|
|
|
|
|
might become bankrupt or fail to fund their share of required
capital contributions, |
|
|
|
may have economic or other business interests or goals that are
inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and |
|
|
|
may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or
objectives. |
Such investments may also have the potential risk of impasses on
decisions, such as a sale, because neither we nor the partner or
co-venturer would have full control over the partnership or
joint venture. Disputes between us and partners or co-venturers
may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our
expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing
their time and effort on our business. In addition, we may in
certain circumstances be liable for the actions of our
third-party partners or co-venturers if:
|
|
|
|
|
we structure a joint venture or conduct business in a manner
that is deemed to be a general partnership with a third party,
in which case we could be liable for the acts of that third
party, |
|
|
|
third-party managers incur debt or other liabilities on behalf
of a joint venture which the joint venture is unable to pay, and
the joint venture agreement provides for capital calls, in which
case we could be liable to make contributions as set forth in
any such joint venture agreement, or |
|
|
|
we agree to cross-default provisions or to cross-collateralize
our properties with the properties in a joint venture, in which
case we could face liability if there is a default relating to
those properties in the joint venture or the obligations
relating to those properties. |
Risks Related to Our Capital Structure
Debt obligations expose us to increased risk of property
losses and may have adverse consequences on our business
operations and our ability to make distributions.
We have used and will continue to use debt to finance property
acquisitions. Our use of debt may have adverse consequences,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Required payments of principal and interest may be greater than
our cash flow from operations. |
|
|
|
We may be forced to dispose of one or more of our properties,
possibly on disadvantageous terms, to make payments on our debt. |
|
|
|
If we default on our debt obligations, the lenders or mortgagees
may foreclose on our properties that secure those loans.
Further, if we default under a mortgage loan, we will
automatically be in default on any other loan that has
cross-default provisions, and we may lose the properties
securing all of these loans. |
22
|
|
|
|
|
A foreclosure on one of our properties will be treated as a sale
of the property for a purchase price equal to the outstanding
balance of the secured debt. If the outstanding balance of the
secured debt exceeds our tax basis in the property, we would
recognize taxable income on foreclosure without realizing any
accompanying cash proceeds to pay the tax (or to make
distributions based on REIT taxable income). |
|
|
|
We may not be able to refinance or extend our existing debt. If
we cannot repay, refinance or extend our debt at maturity, in
addition to our failure to repay our debt, we may be unable to
make distributions to our stockholders at expected levels or at
all. |
|
|
|
Even if we are able to refinance or extend our existing debt,
the terms of any refinancing or extension may not be as
favorable as the terms of our existing debt. If the refinancing
involves a higher interest rate, it could adversely affect our
cash flow and ability to make distributions to stockholders. |
As of March 31, 2005, we had outstanding mortgage
indebtedness of $101.6 million (including unamortized debt
premium of $5.1 million), secured by eight properties, as
well as $2.3 million associated with our unconsolidated
partnership. We had $19.5 million outstanding under our
$100.0 million unsecured credit facility. Upon completion
of this offering, we will have mortgage indebtedness of
approximately $247.0 million (including unamortized debt
premium of $12.3 million) and $250.0 million under our
secured term loan facility, secured by 13 properties, as well as
$2.3 million associated with our unconsolidated
partnership. In addition, we will have $3.0 million
outstanding under our senior unsecured revolving credit
facility. We may incur additional debt in connection with future
acquisitions. Our organizational documents do not limit the
amount or percentage of debt that we may incur.
Our credit facilities include restrictive covenants relating
to our operations, which could limit our ability to respond to
changing market conditions and our ability to make distributions
to our stockholders.
Our credit facilities impose restrictions on us that affect our
distribution and operating policies and our ability to incur
additional debt. For example, we are subject to a maximum
leverage ratio of 60% during the term of the loan, which could
have the effect of reducing our ability to incur additional debt
and consequently reduce our ability to make distributions to our
stockholders. Our credit facilities also contain limitations on
our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in excess
of those required to maintain our REIT status. Specifically, our
credit facilities limit distributions to 95% of funds from
operations or 100% of funds available for distribution plus cash
payments received under master leases on our King of Prussia and
Bayshore Boulevard properties, but not less than the minimum
necessary to enable us to meet our REIT income distribution
requirements. In addition, our credit facilities contain
covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to further
mortgage our properties or reduce insurance coverage, and that
require us to maintain specified levels of net worth. These or
other limitations may adversely affect our flexibility and our
ability to achieve our operating plans.
We may continue to engage in hedging transactions, which can
limit our gains and increase exposure to losses.
We may continue to enter into hedging transactions to protect us
from the effects of interest rate fluctuations on floating rate
debt. Our hedging transactions may include entering into
interest rate swap agreements or interest rate cap or floor
agreements, or other interest rate exchange contracts. Hedging
activities may not have the desired beneficial impact on our
results of operations or financial condition. No hedging
activity can completely insulate us from the risks associated
with changes in interest rates. Moreover, interest rate hedging
could fail to protect us or adversely affect us because, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
Available interest rate hedging may not correspond directly with
the interest rate risk for which we seek protection. |
|
|
|
The duration of the hedge may not match the duration of the
related liability. |
|
|
|
The party owing money in the hedging transaction may default on
its obligation to pay. |
23
|
|
|
|
|
The credit quality of the party owing money on the hedge may be
downgraded to such an extent that it impairs our ability to sell
or assign our side of the hedging transaction. |
|
|
|
The value of derivatives used for hedging may be adjusted from
time to time in accordance with accounting rules to reflect
changes in fair value. Downward adjustments, or
mark-to-market losses, would reduce our
stockholders equity. |
Hedging involves risk and typically involves costs, including
transaction costs, that may reduce our overall returns on our
investments. These costs increase as the period covered by the
hedging increases and during periods of rising and volatile
interest rates. These costs will also limit the amount of cash
available for distribution to stockholders. We generally intend
to hedge as much of the interest rate risk as management
determines is in our best interests given the cost of such
hedging transactions. The REIT qualification rules may limit our
ability to enter into hedging transactions by requiring us to
limit our income from hedges. If we are unable to hedge
effectively because of the REIT rules, we will face greater
interest rate exposure than may be commercially prudent. For the
period from August 11, 2004 to March 31, 2005, we were
not a party to any hedging transactions. In connection with the
KeyBank $250.0 million secured term loan, we have entered
into an interest rate swap agreement, which will have the effect
of fixing the interest rate on the $250.0 million secured
term loan at approximately 6.4%.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our
debt payments and adversely affect our ability to pay
distributions to our stockholders.
Interest we pay could reduce cash available for distributions.
Additionally, if we incur variable rate debt, including
borrowings under our senior secured term loan facility and our
senior unsecured revolving credit facility, to the extent not
adequately hedged, increases in interest rates would increase
our interest costs. These increased interest costs would reduce
our cash flows and our ability to make distributions to you. In
addition, if we need to repay existing debt during a period of
rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or
more of our investments in properties at times that may not
permit realization of the maximum return on such investments.
If we fail to obtain external sources of capital, which is
outside of our control, we may be unable to make distributions
to our stockholders, maintain our REIT qualification, or fund
growth.
In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are
required to distribute annually at least 90% of our net taxable
income, excluding any net capital gain. In addition, we will be
subject to income tax at regular corporate rates to the extent
that we distribute less than 100% of our net taxable income,
including any net capital gains. Because of these distribution
requirements, we may not be able to fund future capital needs,
including any necessary acquisition financing, from operating
cash flow. Consequently, we rely on third-party sources to fund
our capital needs. We may not be able to obtain financings on
favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of
capital depends, in part, on:
|
|
|
|
|
general market conditions, |
|
|
|
the markets perception of our growth potential, |
|
|
|
with respect to acquisition financing, the markets
perception of the value of the properties to be acquired, |
|
|
|
our current debt levels, |
|
|
|
our current and expected future earnings, |
|
|
|
our cash flow and cash distributions, and |
|
|
|
the market price per share of our common stock. |
Additionally, if the ground lease underlying our Landmark at
Eastview property remains in place, it could be more difficult
to borrow using those properties as collateral. Our inability to
obtain capital from third-party sources will adversely affect
our business and limit our growth. Without sufficient capital,
we may not be able to acquire or develop properties when
strategic opportunities exist, satisfy our debt service
24
obligations or make the cash distributions to our stockholders
necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
Risks Related to Our REIT Status
Our failure to qualify as a REIT under the Code would result
in significant adverse tax consequences to us and would
adversely affect our business and the value of our stock.
We believe that we have operated and intend to continue
operating in a manner that will allow us to qualify as a REIT
for federal income tax purposes under the Code. However, the
REIT qualification requirements under the Code are complex and
technical, and the judicial and administrative interpretations
of these Code provisions are limited. The fact that we hold
substantially all of our assets through a partnership further
complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a
seemingly minor technical or inadvertent mistake could
jeopardize our REIT status. Our REIT status depends upon various
factual matters and circumstances that may not be entirely
within our control. In addition, new legislation, regulations,
administrative interpretations or court decisions, each of which
could have retroactive effect, may make it more difficult or
impossible for us to qualify as a REIT, or could reduce the
desirability of an investment in a REIT relative to other
investments. We have not requested and do not plan to request a
ruling from the IRS that we qualify as a REIT, and the
statements in this prospectus are not binding on the IRS or any
court. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that we will be
successful in qualifying as a REIT.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any tax year, we will face
serious adverse tax consequences that would substantially reduce
the funds available for distribution to you for each of the
years involved because:
|
|
|
|
|
we would not be allowed to deduct distributions to stockholders
in computing our taxable income and would be subject to federal
income tax at regular corporate rates, |
|
|
|
we could also be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax
and possibly increased state and local taxes, and |
|
|
|
unless we are entitled to relief under applicable statutory
provisions, we could not elect to be taxed as a REIT for four
taxable years following the year in which we were disqualified. |
In addition, if we fail to qualify as a REIT, we will not be
required to make distributions to stockholders, and all
distributions to stockholders will be subject to tax as ordinary
corporate distributions. As a result of all these factors, our
failure to qualify as a REIT could impair our ability to expand
our business and raise capital and would adversely affect the
value of our common stock.
Even if we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes,
we may be subject to other tax liabilities that reduce our cash
flow.
Even if we remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes, we may
be subject to some federal, state and local taxes on our income
or property. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute annually at
least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders. To the
extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but
distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, we will be
subject to federal corporate income tax on the undistributed
amount. |
|
|
|
We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the
amount, if any, by which distributions we pay in any calendar
year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of
our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income
from prior years. |
|
|
|
If we have net income from the sale or other disposition of
foreclosure property that we hold primarily for sale
to customers in the ordinary course of business or other
non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we must pay tax
on that income at the highest corporate rate. |
25
|
|
|
|
|
If we sell a property in a prohibited transaction,
our gain from the sale would be subject to a 100% penalty tax. A
prohibited transaction is, in general, a sale or
other disposition of property, other than foreclosure property,
held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business. |
To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to borrow funds
during unfavorable market conditions to make distributions to
our stockholders.
To qualify as a REIT, we must distribute to our stockholders
certain amounts each year based on our income as described
above. At times, we may not have sufficient funds to satisfy
these distribution requirements and may need to borrow funds to
maintain our REIT status and avoid the payment of income and
excise taxes. These borrowing needs could result from:
|
|
|
|
|
differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and
inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes, |
|
|
|
the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, |
|
|
|
the creation of reserves, or |
|
|
|
required debt or amortization payments. |
We may need to borrow funds at times when the then-prevailing
market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These
borrowings could increase our costs or reduce our equity and
adversely affect the value of our common stock.
To maintain our REIT status, we may be forced to forego
otherwise attractive opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy tests concerning, among
other things, the sources of our income, the nature and
diversification of our assets, the amounts we distribute to our
stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may be required
to make distributions to stockholders at times when it would be
more advantageous to reinvest cash in our business or when we do
not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus,
compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to
operate solely on the basis of maximizing profits.
The ownership limitations in our charter may restrict or
prevent you from engaging in certain transfers of our stock.
Our charter contains restrictions on the ownership and transfer
of our capital stock that are intended to assist us in complying
with the requirements imposed on REITs by the Code. The
ownership limits contained in our charter provide that, subject
to certain specified exceptions, no person or entity may own
more than 9.8% of the value of our outstanding shares of capital
stock, and no person or entity may own more than 9.8% (by number
or value, whichever is more restrictive) of the outstanding
shares of our common stock. Our charter also (1) prohibits
any person from actually or constructively owning shares of our
capital stock that would cause us to be closely held
under Section 856(h) of the Code or would otherwise cause
us to fail to qualify as a REIT and (2) voids any transfer
that would result in shares of our capital stock being owned by
fewer than 100 persons. The constructive ownership rules of the
Code are complex, and may cause shares of our capital stock
owned actually or constructively by a group of related
individuals and/or entities to be constructively owned by one
individual or entity. As a result, acquisition of less than 9.8%
of the shares of our capital stock (or the acquisition of an
interest in equity of, or in certain affiliates or subsidiaries
of, an entity that owns, actually or constructively, our capital
stock) by an individual or entity, could cause that individual
or entity, or another individual or entity, to own
constructively shares in a manner that would violate the 9.8%
ownership limits or such other limit as provided in our charter
or permitted by our board of directors. Our board of directors
may, but in no event will be required to, waive the 9.8%
ownership limit with respect to a particular stockholder if it
determines that the ownership will not jeopardize our status as
a REIT. As a condition of granting such a waiver, our board of
directors may require a ruling from the IRS or an opinion of
counsel satisfactory to our board and will obtain undertakings
or representations from the applicant with respect to preserving
our status as
26
a REIT. Pursuant to our charter, if any purported transfer of
our capital stock or any other event would result in any person
violating the ownership limits set forth in our charter or
otherwise permitted by our board of directors, then that number
of shares in excess of the applicable limit will be
automatically transferred, pursuant to our charter, to a trust,
the beneficiary of which will be a qualified charitable
organization we select or, under certain circumstances, the
transfer of our capital stock or other event will be void and of
no force or effect.
Risks Related to This Offering
Several of our underwriters may have conflicts of interest
that arise out of a contractual relationship with affiliates of
those underwriters.
We have entered into credit facilities with a number of
financial institutions, including KeyBank National Association,
an affiliate of KeyBanc Capital Markets, Royal Bank of Canada,
an affiliate of RBC Capital Markets Corporation, and Raymond
James Bank, FSB, an affiliate of Raymond James & Associates,
Inc., which facilities allow for total borrowings of
$600.0 million. As members of the credit facility
syndicate, these affiliates will benefit from this offering
because substantially all of the net proceeds of this offering
will be used to repay loans made under such facilities prior to
this offering. This repayment gives the identified affiliates an
interest in the successful completion of this offering beyond
the customary underwriting discounts and commissions received by
the underwriters in this offering. This could result in a
conflict of interest, as our underwriters obligations to
us and the investors in this offering may conflict with those of
their affiliates.
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may
be volatile following this offering, and you could experience a
loss if you sell your shares.
The market price of our common stock may be volatile. In
addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate
and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market
price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be
unable to resell your shares at or above the public offering
price. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common
stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future.
Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price
or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our
common stock include:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating
results or dividends, |
|
|
|
changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates, |
|
|
|
publication of research reports about us or the real estate
industry, |
|
|
|
increases in market interest rates that lead purchasers of our
shares to demand a higher yield, |
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies, |
|
|
|
adverse market reaction to any additional debt we incur or
acquisitions we make in the future, |
|
|
|
additions or departures of key management personnel, |
|
|
|
actions by institutional stockholders, |
|
|
|
speculation in the press or investment community, |
|
|
|
the realization of any of the other risk factors presented in
this prospectus, and |
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions. |
An increase in market interest rates may have an adverse
effect on the market price of our securities.
Changes in market interest rates have historically affected the
trading prices of equity securities issued by REITs. One of the
factors that will influence the price of our common stock will
be the dividend yield on our common stock (as a percentage of
the price of our common stock) relative to market interest rates.
27
An increase in market interest rates, which are currently at low
levels relative to historical rates, may lead prospective
purchasers of our common stock to expect a higher dividend
yield. Further, higher interest rates would likely increase our
borrowing costs and potentially decrease funds available for
distribution. Thus, higher market interest rates could harm our
financial condition and results of operations and could cause
the market price of our common stock to fall.
Broad market fluctuations could negatively impact the market
price of our common stock.
The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations that have affected the market price of many
companies in industries similar or related to ours and that have
been unrelated to these companies operating performance.
These broad market fluctuations could reduce the market price of
our common stock. Furthermore, our operating results and
prospects may be below the expectations of public market
analysts and investors or may be lower than those of companies
with comparable market capitalizations. Either of these factors
could lead to a material decline in the market price of our
common stock.
Our distributions to stockholders may decline at any time.
We may not continue our current level of distributions to
stockholders. Our board of directors will determine future
distributions based on a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
cash available for distribution, |
|
|
|
operating results, |
|
|
|
our financial condition, especially in relation to our
anticipated future capital needs, |
|
|
|
then current expansion plans, |
|
|
|
the distribution requirements for REITs under the Code, and |
|
|
|
other factors our board deems relevant. |
The number of shares of our common stock available for future
sale could adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
We cannot predict whether future issuances of shares of our
common stock or the availability of shares for resale in the
open market will decrease the market price per share of our
common stock. Upon completion of this offering, we will have
outstanding 42,444,558 shares of our common stock
(44,094,558 shares if the underwriters exercise their over
allotment option in full), as well as units in our operating
partnership which may be exchanged for 2,870,564 shares of
our common stock. In addition, we have reserved an additional
2,105,442 shares of common stock for future issuance under
our incentive award plan and have issued a warrant to Raymond
James in connection with our IPO to purchase 270,000 shares of
our common stock at the IPO price. Sales of substantial amounts
of shares of our common stock in the public market, or upon
exchange of operating partnership units, or the perception that
such sales might occur, could adversely affect the market price
of our common stock.
Any of the following could have an adverse effect on the market
price of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
the exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option, |
|
|
|
the exchange of units for common stock, |
|
|
|
the exercise of any options granted to certain directors,
executive officers and other employees under our incentive award
plan, |
|
|
|
issuances of preferred stock with liquidation or distribution
preferences, and |
|
|
|
other issuances of our common stock. |
Additionally, the existence of units, options and shares of our
common stock reserved for issuance upon exchange of units may
adversely affect the terms upon which we may be able to obtain
additional
28
capital through the sale of equity securities. In addition,
future sales of shares of our common stock may be dilutive to
existing stockholders.
Each of our then-current executive officers entered into a
lock-up agreement restricting the sale of his shares for up to
one year following our IPO, which expires in August 2005.
Further, in connection with this offering, each of our executive
officers entered into a lock-up agreement restricting the sale
of his or her shares for up to 90 days following the
completion of this offering. Raymond James &
Associates, Inc., at any time, may release all or a portion of
the common stock subject to the foregoing lock-up provisions.
When determining whether or not to release shares subject to a
lock-up agreement, Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
will consider, among other factors, the persons reasons
for requesting the release, the number of shares for which the
release is being requested and the possible impact of the
release of the shares on the market price of our common stock.
If the restrictions under such agreements are waived, the
affected common stock may be available for sale into the market,
which could reduce the market price of our common stock.
From time to time we also may issue shares of our common stock
or operating partnership units in connection with property,
portfolio or business acquisitions. We may grant additional
demand or piggyback registration rights in connection with these
issuances. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or
the perception that these sales could occur, may adversely
affect the prevailing market price of our common stock or may
adversely affect the terms upon which we may be able to obtain
additional capital through the sale of equity securities.
29
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We make statements in this prospectus that are forward-looking
statements. In particular, statements pertaining to our capital
resources, portfolio performance and results of operations
contain forward-looking statements. Likewise, our pro forma
financial statements and our statements regarding anticipated
growth in our funds from operations and anticipated market
conditions, demographics and results of operations are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve
numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them
as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements
depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or
imprecise, and we may not be able to realize them. We do not
guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen
as described (or that they will happen at all). You can identify
forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, expects,
may, will, should,
seeks, approximately,
intends, plans, pro forma,
estimates or anticipates or the negative
of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can
also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of
strategy, plans or intentions. The following factors, among
others, could cause actual results and future events to differ
materially from those set forth or contemplated in the
forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
adverse economic or real estate developments in the life science
industry or the Boston or California regions, |
|
|
|
general economic conditions, |
|
|
|
our ability to compete effectively, |
|
|
|
defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants, |
|
|
|
increased interest rates and operating costs, |
|
|
|
our failure to obtain necessary outside financing, |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully complete real estate acquisitions,
developments and dispositions, |
|
|
|
our failure to successfully operate acquired properties and
operations, |
|
|
|
our failure to maintain our status as a REIT, |
|
|
|
government approvals, actions and initiatives, including the
need for compliance with environmental requirements, |
|
|
|
financial market fluctuations, and |
|
|
|
changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real
property tax rates. |
While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs,
they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. For a further discussion of these and other factors
that could impact our future results, performance or
transactions, see the section above entitled Risk
Factors.
30
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds of this offering will be
approximately $229.1 million, after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses we will
pay. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, our net proceeds will be approximately $263.6 million.
We will contribute the net proceeds of this offering to our
operating partnership. Our operating partnership will
subsequently use the proceeds received from us as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
$100.0 million to repay indebtedness under our senior
unsecured term loan facility, and |
|
|
|
$129.1 million to repay indebtedness under our senior
unsecured revolving credit facility. |
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, we expect to use the additional net proceeds, which will
be $34.4 million, to further repay indebtedness under our
senior unsecured revolving credit facility, and any remaining
proceeds to fund future property acquisitions and for other
general corporate and working capital purposes.
The senior unsecured term loan facility and the senior unsecured
revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association and
several other lenders bears interest at a floating rate equal
to, at our option, either (1) reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a
spread which ranges from 120 to 200 basis points, depending
on our leverage or (2) the higher of (a) the prime
rate then in effect plus a spread which ranges from 0 to
50 basis points and (b) the federal funds rate then in
effect plus a spread which ranges from 50 to 100 basis
points, in each case, depending on our leverage, and matures in
May 2008. The proceeds of the senior unsecured term loan
facility and the senior unsecured revolving credit facility were
used to partially fund the acquisition of the Lyme portfolio.
In the ordinary course of our business, we continually evaluate
properties for possible acquisition by us. At any given time, we
may be a party to one or more non-binding letters of intent or
conditional purchase agreements with respect to these possible
acquisitions and may be in various stages of due diligence and
underwriting as part of our evaluations. As of the date of this
prospectus, we were party to non-binding letters of intent with
respect to certain acquisitions. Consummation of any potential
transaction is necessarily subject to significant outstanding
conditions, including satisfactory completion of our due
diligence or, in the case of letters of intent, the negotiation
of definitive purchase or loan agreements. As a result, we can
make no assurance that any such transaction will be completed,
or, if completed, what the terms or timing of the transaction
will be.
Pending application of cash proceeds, we will invest such
portion of the net proceeds in interest-bearing accounts and
short-term, interest-bearing securities, which are consistent
with our intention to qualify for taxation as a REIT.
31
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK AND DISTRIBUTION POLICY
Our common stock has been listed on the NYSE under the symbol
BMR since August 6, 2004. The following table
sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low and last
sale prices in dollars on the NYSE for our common stock and the
distributions we declared with respect to the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividend | |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Last | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Period August 6, 2004 to September 30, 2004
|
|
$ |
18.05 |
|
|
$ |
15.75 |
|
|
$ |
17.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.1497 |
|
Quarter Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
22.95 |
|
|
$ |
17.10 |
|
|
$ |
22.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.2700 |
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
22.40 |
|
|
$ |
19.40 |
|
|
$ |
20.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.2700 |
|
Period April 1, 2005 to May 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
22.73 |
|
|
$ |
19.39 |
|
|
$ |
22.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.2700 |
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
On June 3, 2005, we declared a dividend of $0.27 per common
share and unit, for the period from April 1, 2005 to
June 30, 2005, payable to holders of record on
June 15, 2005. |
We intend to continue to declare quarterly distributions on our
common stock. The actual amount and timing of distributions,
however, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and
will depend upon our financial condition in addition to the
requirements of the Code, and no assurance can be given as to
the amounts or timing of future distributions.
Subject to the distribution requirements applicable to REITs
under the Code, we intend, to the extent practicable, to invest
substantially all of the proceeds from sales and refinancings of
our assets in real estate-related assets and other assets. We
may, however, under certain circumstances, make a distribution
of capital or of assets. Such distributions, if any, will be
made at the discretion of our board of directors. Distributions
will be made in cash to extent that cash is available for
distribution.
On June 2, 2005, the closing sale price for our common
stock, as reported on the NYSE, was $21.86. As of May 31,
2005, there were 38 record holders of our common stock. This
figure does not reflect the beneficial ownership of shares held
in nominee name.
32
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth the historical consolidated
capitalization of our company as of March 31, 2005 and our
pro forma consolidated capitalization as of March 31, 2005,
as adjusted to give effect to this offering. You should read
this table in conjunction with Use of Proceeds,
Selected Financial Data, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources and
our consolidated financial statements and the notes to our
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Mortgages and other secured loans
|
|
$ |
101,594 |
|
|
$ |
496,982 |
|
Unsecured loans and lines of credit
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
2,958 |
|
Minority interest in our operating partnership
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 31,432,558 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2005; 42,432,558 shares issued and
outstanding on a pro forma basis(1)
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
435,010 |
|
|
|
664,039 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
|
Dividends in excess of earnings
|
|
|
(11,041 |
) |
|
|
(12,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
419,873 |
|
|
|
647,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
563,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,169,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The common stock outstanding as shown excludes
(a) 2,870,564 shares issuable upon conversion of
outstanding units of our operating partnership,
(b) 2,117,442 shares available for future issuance
under our incentive award plan which includes certain grants of
restricted stock, of which 12,000 shares were granted after
March 31, 2005 and (c) 270,000 shares issuable
upon exercise of a warrant issued to Raymond James &
Associates, Inc. in connection with our IPO. |
33
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected financial and operating
data on a pro forma and historical basis for BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc., and on an historical basis for 201 Industrial. We
have not presented historical information for BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. prior to August 11, 2004, the date on which we
consummated our IPO, because during the period from our
formation until our IPO we did not have any material corporate
activity and because we believe that a discussion of the results
of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. during that period would not be
meaningful.
You should read the following pro forma and historical
information in conjunction with our pro forma consolidated
financial statements and historical financial statements and
notes thereto, as well as with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, which are included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
The selected historical balance sheet information as of
December 31, 2004, for BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002 for 201 Industrial, and the
historical statements of income and other data for the period
from August 11, 2004 through December 31, 2004 for
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and for period from January 1,
2004 through August 17, 2004 and for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 for 201 Industrial, have
been derived from our historical financial statements audited by
KPMG LLP, independent registered public accountants, whose
report with respect thereto is included elsewhere in this
prospectus, except as it relates to the historical balance sheet
information as of December 31, 2002 of 201 Industrial,
which report is not included in this prospectus. The historical
balance sheet and statement of income and other data as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 of 201
Industrial, is unaudited. 201 Industrial is the largest property
contributed to the company in connection with our formation
transactions and therefore has been identified as the accounting
acquirer pursuant to paragraph 17 of
SFAS No. 141. The contribution of 201 Industrial
as part of our formation transactions was completed on
August 17, 2004. The contribution of the interests in all
of the other contribution properties and all acquisitions have
been accounted for as a purchase in accordance with
SFAS No. 141. The historical balance sheet information
at March 31, 2005, and the historical statement of
operations and other data for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, have been derived from the
unaudited historical financial statements of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and 201 Industrial.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data are
presented as if this offering had occurred on March 31,
2005. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of
operations and other data for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004,
are presented as if this offering, the IPO, and all acquisitions
and contributions had occurred on January 1, 2004. The pro
forma information is not necessarily indicative of what our
actual financial position or results of operations would have
been as of or for the periods indicated, nor does it purport to
represent our future financial position or results of operations.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period | |
|
Period | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
August 11, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
2004 through | |
|
2004 through | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
August 17, | |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Statements of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
27,695 |
|
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
111,696 |
|
|
$ |
19,432 |
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
6,275 |
|
|
$ |
5,869 |
|
|
$ |
4,421 |
|
|
$ |
955 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
11,853 |
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
41,142 |
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
|
|
24,471 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
154,216 |
|
|
|
28,654 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
6,587 |
|
|
|
4,704 |
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
8,529 |
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
33,093 |
|
|
|
10,030 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
16,453 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
42,807 |
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,357 |
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
26,889 |
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
102,710 |
|
|
|
22,602 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
16,147 |
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
51,506 |
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
Equity in net income (loss) of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,155 |
) |
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(28,955 |
) |
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
(1,760 |
) |
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
|
|
(3,154 |
) |
|
|
(2,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
8,121 |
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
23,003 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,058 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
21,840 |
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share(3)
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share(4)
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
42,129,613 |
|
|
|
31,129,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,965,178 |
|
|
|
30,965,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
45,148,820 |
|
|
|
34,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,767,775 |
|
|
|
33,767,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental properties, net
|
|
$ |
1,035,489 |
|
|
$ |
489,136 |
|
|
$ |
79,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
468,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,025 |
|
|
$ |
47,853 |
|
|
$ |
48,627 |
|
|
$ |
36,279 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,226,780 |
|
|
|
601,617 |
|
|
|
84,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,056 |
|
|
|
50,732 |
|
|
|
50,500 |
|
|
|
37,755 |
|
Mortgages and other secured loans
|
|
|
496,962 |
|
|
|
101,594 |
|
|
|
64,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,208 |
|
|
|
37,743 |
|
|
|
36,879 |
|
|
|
16,039 |
|
Unsecured line of credit
|
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
557,834 |
|
|
|
159,258 |
|
|
|
69,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,597 |
|
|
|
38,563 |
|
|
|
37,961 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity and partners capital
|
|
|
646,460 |
|
|
|
419,873 |
|
|
|
15,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
12,169 |
|
|
|
12,539 |
|
|
|
12,752 |
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
1,226,780 |
|
|
|
601,617 |
|
|
|
84,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,056 |
|
|
|
50,732 |
|
|
|
50,500 |
|
|
|
37,752 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations(5)
|
|
$ |
19,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,959 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456,680 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(17,703 |
) |
|
|
(18,482 |
) |
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
470,433 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
16,569 |
|
|
|
18,906 |
|
35
|
|
(1) |
Represents the results and financial position of the Predecessor
for the three months ended March 31, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Consolidated and combined cash flow information of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and the Predecessor for the year ended
December 31, 2004. |
|
(3) |
Basic earnings per share equals net income divided by the number
of shares of our common stock outstanding excluding the weighted
average of the number of unvested shares of restricted stock.
Pro forma basic earnings per share is computed assuming this
offering was consummated as of the first day of the period
presented. |
|
(4) |
Diluted earnings per share equals pro forma net income divided
by the sum of the number of shares of our common stock
outstanding excluding the weighted average number of unvested
shares of restricted stock, plus an amount computed using the
treasury stock method with respect to the unvested shares of our
restricted stock. Pro forma diluted earnings per share is
computed assuming this offering was consummated as of the first
day of the period presented. |
|
(5) |
As defined by NAREIT, FFO represents net income (computed in
accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of
property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization
(excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
We present FFO because we consider it an important supplemental
measure of our operating performance and believe it is
frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other
interested parties in the evaluation of REITs, many of which
present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to
exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of
real estate and related assets which assumes that the value of
real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically,
however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market
conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization
unique to real estate, gains and losses from property
dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance
measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact
to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates,
operating costs, development activities and interest costs,
providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income.
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the
Board of Governors of NAREIT in its March 1995 White Paper (as
amended in November 1999 and April 2002), which may differ from
the methodology for calculating FFO utilized by other equity
REITs and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other
REITs. Further, FFO does not represent amounts available for
managements discretionary use because of needed capital
replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other
commitments and uncertainties. FFO should not be considered as
an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with
GAAP) as an indicator of our financial performance or to cash
flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with
GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of
funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to
pay dividends or make distributions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reconciliation of Pro Forma Funds from Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
$ |
21,840 |
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma minority interests
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
Pro forma real estate depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
42,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma funds from operations
|
|
$ |
19,348 |
|
|
$ |
66,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with
Selected Financial Data and the financial statements
and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus. Where appropriate, the following discussion includes
analysis of the effects of our IPO and the related formation
transactions. These effects are reflected in the historical and
pro forma consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere
in this prospectus. References to we, us
and our refer to BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Overview
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. is a Maryland corporation formed in
April 2004. We operate as a REIT focused on acquiring,
developing, owning, leasing and managing laboratory and office
space for the life science industry. Our tenants include
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research
institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in
the life science industry. Our current properties and our
primary acquisition targets are located in markets with well
established reputations as centers for scientific research,
including Boston, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle,
Maryland, Pennsylvania and New York/ New Jersey.
We completed an IPO of our common stock in August 2004. In
connection with the IPO, we acquired 13 properties with an
aggregate of 2.3 million rentable square feet of laboratory
and office space. We acquired Industrial Road, Science Center
Drive, Bernardo Center Drive, Balboa Avenue, Eisenhower Road and
a general partnership interest in McKellar Court from affiliates
and others for an aggregate of 2.9 million operating
partnership units, aggregate cash consideration of
$77.0 million using net proceeds of the IPO and the
assumption of $14.0 million of debt (excluding
$10.9 million of principal associated with our McKellar
Court property, which is owned through an unconsolidated
partnership, and excluding $1.8 million of premium). In
addition, we acquired seven properties from unaffiliated third
parties: Landmark at Eastview, King of Prussia, Elliott Avenue,
Monte Villa Parkway, Bridgeview, Bayshore Boulevard and Towne
Centre Drive. These properties were acquired for aggregate cash
consideration of $323.2 million using net proceeds of the
IPO and the assumption of $29.0 million of debt (excluding
$3.2 million of premium). The seller of the Bridgeview
property exercised its right to extend the closing date on a
portion of the property, consisting of one building representing
$16.2 million (or approximately 50% of the purchase price),
to March 2005 to facilitate a like-kind exchange under
Section 1031 of the Code.
Since the completion of the IPO, we have acquired
20 properties and the third building on our Bridgeview
property in Hayward, California, with an aggregate of
2.0 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space. We acquired San Diego Science Center, Ardentech
Court in Fremont, California, Beckley Street and Tributary
Street in Baltimore, Maryland (in a sale-leaseback transaction
with Guilford Pharmaceuticals Inc.), Waples Street in
San Diego (through a majority-owned joint venture),
Graphics Drive in Ewing, New Jersey, Fresh Pond Research Park in
Cambridge, Massachusetts, Coolidge Avenue in Watertown,
Massachusetts, Phoenixville Pike in Malvern, Pennsylvania, Nancy
Ridge Drive in San Diego, Dumbarton Circle in Fremont,
California and the Lyme portfolio from unaffiliated third
parties for aggregate cash consideration of $546.9 million
and the assumption of $143.0 million of debt (excluding
$7.8 million of premium). As of May 31, 2005, our
properties were approximately 92.2% leased to 76 tenants. Of the
remaining unleased space, approximately 149,412 square
feet, or 3.5% of our total rentable square footage, was under
redevelopment.
On May 31, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the Lyme
portfolio. The Lyme portfolio consists of ten buildings with an
aggregate of approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet
of laboratory and office space which is currently 96.8% leased
with an average remaining term of ten years, and includes the
parking structure with 447 parking spaces. The purchase price
was $523.6 million, excluding closing costs, and was funded
through borrowings under three credit facilities with KeyBank
and other lenders and the assumption of approximately $131.2 of
indebtedness.
37
Our business consists of acquiring and managing office and
laboratory properties primarily leased on a triple-net basis to
life science tenants. We acquired our existing portfolio using
our focused acquisition strategy. This strategy emphasizes a
critical review of each propertys location, design
elements and suitability for alternative tenants. In most cases,
we acquire properties with leases in place and we structure our
acquisition based on our careful consideration of the financial
position and prospects of the tenants, as well as the lease
structure and remaining term of the lease. See Business
and Properties Our Business Strategy.
Our tenant focus is on entities in the life science industry.
Compared to more generic office and industrial properties,
properties suitable for use by life science tenants often have
enhanced floor rigidity and load bearing capacities, higher
floor-to-ceiling clear heights, enhanced electrical, plumbing
and HVAC systems and other improved infrastructure.
We believe that properties suitable for tenants in the life
science industry will provide a favorable risk-adjusted rate of
return. This belief is based on a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
high demand for this property type due to overall growth in the
life science industry and the mission-critical nature of these
properties to tenants in that industry, and |
|
|
|
restricted supply of this property type resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
lack of familiarity with the investment merits of the life
science industry by the real estate market in general, |
|
|
|
the unique construction and design elements for this property
type, which keep many landlords focused on lower-cost office
space, warehouse space and other types of real estate
investments, and |
|
|
|
low availability of suitable financing for properties containing
life science tenants. Managements experience is that many
lenders will not underwrite properties designed for life science
tenants because of the high cost per square foot and the fact
that many tenants in the industry are not profitable. |
Leases for life science tenants typically are triple-net leases
but also include gross leases and modified gross leases.
Triple-net leases require the tenant to pay its pro rata share
of substantially all property operating expenses, including
property taxes, insurance, maintenance and utilities. Gross
leases require the landlord to pay all property operating
expenses, and modified gross leases require the landlord and the
tenant each to pay a portion of the property operating expenses.
Our portfolio primarily consists of triple-net leases where the
tenants reimburse us for substantially all of their pro rata
share of the properties operating expenses. Our leases
typically include annual rent escalations, either at fixed rates
or indexed escalations (based on the Consumer Price Index or
other measures).
Consistent with life science industry practices with respect to
triple-net leases, our tenants are generally responsible for
capital expenditures and maintenance necessary to maintain the
condition of the property. The shifting of all or a large
portion of operating and capital expenditures to tenants under
triple-net or modified gross leases results in a business with
relatively low overhead and that, as a consequence, we believe
is highly scalable. Furthermore, our tenants typically make
significant expenditures for tenant improvements. Many of these
improvements become our property at the conclusion of the lease.
This investment serves as a barrier to exit for our current
tenants and as an inducement for prospective tenants if we need
to re-lease the space.
Our objective is to use debt to finance, on average,
approximately 50% of the acquisition cost of the properties that
we buy. We intend to leverage the equity we raise in this
offering by financing our future acquisitions with a combination
of equity, long-term fixed- or floating-rate debt as well as
floating-rate credit facilities. Our objective is to finance
each property with long-term fixed-rate debt with a maturity
matching or exceeding, to the extent possible, the remaining
term of the lease. This strategy minimizes interest rate risk
and should result in more consistent and reliable cash flows. We
believe that our
38
financing plan will enable us to execute on our acquisition
strategy as detailed in Business and
Properties Our Business Strategy.
Factors Which May Influence Future Operations
Approximately 3.6% of our leased square footage expires during
2005 and approximately 3.8% of our leased square footage expires
during 2006. Our leasing strategy focuses on leasing currently
vacant space and negotiating renewals for leases scheduled to
expire, and identifying new tenants or existing tenants seeking
additional space to occupy the spaces for which we are unable to
negotiate such renewals. Additionally, we will seek to lease
space that is currently under master lease arrangements at our
Bayshore and King of Prussia properties, which expire in 2006
and 2008, respectively.
Our corporate strategy is to continue to focus on acquiring,
developing, owning, leasing and managing laboratory and office
space for the life science industry. Our leasing strategy
focuses on executing long-term leases with creditworthy tenants.
We also intend to proceed with new developments, when prudent.
The success of our leasing and development strategy will be
dependent upon the general economic conditions in the United
States and in our primary target markets of Boston,
San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland,
Pennsylvania and New York/ New Jersey.
We believe that, on a portfolio basis, rental rates on leases
expiring in 2005 and 2006 are at or below market rental rates
that are currently being achieved in our markets. However, we
cannot give any assurance that leases will be renewed or that
available space will be re-leased at rental rates equal to or
above the current contractual rental rates or at all.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to use judgment in the application of
accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. These judgments affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
periods. If our judgment or interpretation of the facts and
circumstances relating to various transactions had been
different, it is possible that different accounting policies
would have been applied resulting in a different presentation of
our financial statements. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our
estimates and assumptions. In the event estimates or assumptions
prove to be different from actual results, adjustments are made
in subsequent periods to reflect more current information. Below
is a discussion of accounting policies that we consider critical
in that they may require complex judgment in their application
or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Code.
Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly
technical and complex provisions of the Code to our operations
and financial results and the determination of various factual
matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. We
believe that our current organization and method of operation
comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Code
to enable us to qualify, and continue to qualify, as a REIT.
However, it is possible that we have been organized or have
operated in a manner that would not allow us to qualify as a
REIT, or that our future operations could cause us to fail to
qualify.
If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, then we
will be required to pay federal income tax (including any
applicable alternative minimum tax) and, in most of the states
in which we operate, state income tax on our taxable income at
regular corporate tax rates. We are subject to certain state and
local taxes. If we lose our REIT status, then our net earnings
available for investment or distribution to stockholders would
be significantly reduced for each of the years involved, and we
would no longer be required to make distributions to our
stockholders.
39
|
|
|
Investments in Rental Property |
Purchase accounting was applied, on a pro-rata basis where
appropriate, to the assets and liabilities of real estate
entities in which we acquired an interest or a partial interest.
The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property (which
includes land, buildings, and improvements) is determined by
valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the
as-if-vacant value is then allocated to land,
buildings and improvements based on managements
determination of the relative fair value of these assets. We
determine the as-if-vacant fair value using methods similar to
those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by us
in performing these analyses include an estimate of the carrying
costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market
conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating
carrying costs, we include real estate taxes, insurance and
other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental revenue
during the expected lease-up periods based on current market
demand.
In allocating fair value to the identified intangible assets and
liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and
below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present
value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks
associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between
(1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the
in-place leases and (2) our estimate of the fair market
lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over
a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the
leases. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized
as a reduction of rental income over the remaining
non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized
below-market lease values (presented as acquired lease
obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) are
amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term
and any fixed rate renewal periods in the respective leases. If
a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination
of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease,
any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be
written off.
The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets consists
of acquired in-place leases and acquired management agreements.
The fair value allocated to acquired in-place leases consists of
a variety of components including, but not necessarily limited
to: (1) the value associated with avoiding the cost of
originating the acquired in-place leases (i.e. the market cost
to execute a lease, including leasing commissions and legal
fees, if any); (2) the value associated with lost revenue
related to tenant reimbursable operating costs estimated to be
incurred during the assumed lease-up period (i.e. real estate
taxes, insurance and other operating expenses); (3) the
value associated with lost rental revenue from existing leases
during the assumed lease-up period; and (4) the value
associated with avoided tenant improvement costs or other
inducements to secure a tenant lease. The fair value assigned to
the acquired management agreements are recorded at the present
value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks
associated with the management agreements acquired) of the
acquired management agreements with certain tenants of the
acquired properties. The values of in-place leases and
management agreements (presented as deferred leasing costs on
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) are amortized to
expense over the remaining non-cancelable period of the
respective leases or agreements. If a lease were to be
terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized
amounts related to that lease would be written off.
Costs related to acquisition, development, construction and
improvements are capitalized. Capitalized costs associated with
unsuccessful acquisitions are charged to expense when an
acquisition is abandoned.
Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expenses as incurred
and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized.
Repairs and maintenance costs include all costs that do not
extend the useful life of an asset or increase its operating
efficiency. Significant replacement and betterments represent
costs that extend an assets useful life or increase its
operating efficiency.
Rental income is recognized using the straight-line method over
the terms of the tenant leases. Accrued straight-line rents
included in our consolidated balance sheets represent the
aggregate excess of rental revenue recognized on a straight-line
basis over the contractual rent. Our leases generally contain
40
provisions under which the tenants reimburse us for a portion of
property operating expenses and real estate taxes incurred by
us. Such reimbursements are recognized in the period that the
expenses are incurred. Lease termination fees are recognized
when the related leases are canceled and we have no continuing
obligation to provide services to such former tenants. As
discussed above, we recognize amortization of the value of
acquired above or below market tenant leases as a reduction of
rental income in the case of above market leases or an increase
to rental revenue in the case of below market leases.
We must make subjective estimates related to when our revenue is
earned and the collectibility of our accounts receivable related
to minimum rent, deferred rent, expense reimbursements, lease
termination fees and other income. We specifically analyze
accounts receivable and historical bad debts, tenant
concentrations, tenant creditworthiness, and current economic
trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable. These estimates have a direct
impact on our net income because a higher bad debt allowance
would result in lower net income, and recognizing rental revenue
as earned in one period versus another would result in higher or
lower net income for a particular period.
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
We compute depreciation and amortization on our properties using
the straight-line method based on estimated useful asset lives.
In accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations, we allocate the acquisition cost of real
estate to land, building, tenant improvements, acquired above-
and below-market leases, origination costs and acquired in-place
leases based on an assessment of their relative fair values and
depreciate or amortize these assets over their useful lives. The
amortization of acquired above- and below-market leases and
acquired in-place leases is recorded as an adjustment to revenue
and depreciation and amortization, respectively, in the
consolidated statements of income.
Results of Operations
The following is a comparison, for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, of the consolidated operating
results of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., the operating results of
201 Industrial Road, L.P., our predecessor, and the combined
operating results of Bernardo Center Drive, Science Center Drive
and Balboa Avenue. We refer to Bernardo Center Drive, Science
Center Drive and Balboa Avenue as the Combined Contribution
Properties. As part of our formation transactions, our
predecessor was contributed to us on August 17, 2004 in
exchange for 1,461,451 units in our operating partnership,
and the Combined Contribution Properties, which were under
common management with our predecessor, were contributed to us
in exchange for 1,153,708 units in our operating
partnership.
Our predecessor is considered for accounting purposes to be our
acquirer. As such, the historical financial statements presented
herein for our predecessor were prepared on a stand-alone basis.
The financial statements of the Combined Contribution Properties
are presented herein on an historical combined basis. Management
does not consider the financial condition and operating results
of our predecessor on a stand-alone basis to be indicative of
the historical operating results of our company taken as a
whole. Therefore, the following discussion relates to the
financial condition and operating results of our predecessor and
the Combined Contribution Properties, the other properties
contributed to us over which our management has provided
continuous common management throughout the applicable reporting
periods, on a combined historical basis. Subsequent to the dates
they were contributed to us, the financial information for each
of our predecessor and the Combined Contribution Properties is
included in the financial information for BioMed Realty Trust,
which commenced operations on August 11, 2004. Management
believes this presentation provides a more meaningful discussion
of the financial condition and operating results of BioMed
Realty Trust, our predecessor and the Combined Contribution
Properties. In order to present these results on a meaningful
combined basis, the historical combined financial information
for all periods presented includes combining entries to reflect
the partners capital of our predecessor which was not
owned by management.
41
The following tables set forth the basis for presenting the
historical combined financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
Combined Contribution Properties | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Period | |
|
Period | |
|
Period | |
|
|
|
|
August 11, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
|
2004 through | |
|
2004 through | |
|
2004 through | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
August 17, | |
|
the Date of | |
|
Combining | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Contribution | |
|
Entries | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
19,432 |
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,602 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,654 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
11,619 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,325 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,996 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,602 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,130 |
|
|
Equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
(1,760 |
) |
|
|
(1,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(582 |
) |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
(582 |
) |
|
$ |
5,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution | |
|
Combining | |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Properties | |
|
Entries | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
6,275 |
|
|
$ |
4,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,464 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,524 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
|
|
(2,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
(1,367 |
) |
|
$ |
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution | |
|
Combining | |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Properties | |
|
Entries | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
5,869 |
|
|
$ |
4,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,058 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,587 |
|
|
|
4,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,086 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(3,154 |
) |
|
|
(2,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(965 |
) |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
$ |
(965 |
) |
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
|
|
Contribution | |
|
Combining | |
|
|
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
Predecessor | |
|
Properties | |
|
Entries | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Three Months Ended March 31 (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
24,471 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
Equity in net income of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
$ |
(370 |
) |
|
$ |
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 |
Rental Revenues. Rental revenues increased
$11.6 million to $14.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 compared to $2.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was
primarily due to the inclusion of rental revenues for the
properties acquired in connection with our IPO as well as
acquisitions subsequent to our IPO.
Tenant Recoveries. Revenues from tenant reimbursements
increased $7.0 million to $7.3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $332,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was
primarily due to the inclusion of tenant reimbursements for the
properties acquired in connection with our IPO as well as
acquisitions subsequent to our IPO.
Other Income. Other income is comprised of a gain on
early termination of lease of a portion of the Nektar lease at
Industrial Road of $3.0 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 compared to $0 for the three months ended
March 31, 2004.
Rental Operations Expense. Rental operations expenses
increased $6.3 million to $6.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $139,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was
primarily due to the inclusion of rental property operations
expenses for the properties acquired in connection with our IPO
as well as acquisitions subsequent to our IPO.
Real Estate Tax Expense. Real estate tax expense
increased $1.7 million to $1.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $144,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was
primarily due to the inclusion of property taxes for the
properties acquired in connection with our IPO as well as
additional property acquisitions subsequent to our IPO.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased $5.8 million to
$6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005
compared to $446,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2004. The increase was primarily due to the inclusion of
depreciation and amortization expense for the properties
acquired in connection with our IPO as well as acquisitions
subsequent to our IPO.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and
administrative expenses increased to $2.6 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 from $58,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was
primarily due to the IPO, the hiring of new personnel after the
IPO, the addition of expenses relating to operating as a public
company, compensation expense related to unvested restricted
stock compensation awards accrued during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and higher consulting and professional fees
associated with corporate governance and Sarbanes-Oxley
Section 404 implementation.
Interest Income. Interest income increased to $78,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $5,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. This is primarily due to
interest earned on an increase of funds held by us during the
three months ended March 31, 2005.
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased $100,000 to
$1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005
compared to $1.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2004. The increase in interest is a result of
more overall debt outstanding after the consummation of the IPO
partially offset by a reduction of interest expense in 2005 due
to the accretion of debt premium, which decreased interest
expense by $261,000.
Minority Interests. Minority interests decreased to
$429,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from
$442,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The
minority interest allocations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 are not comparable due to the IPO.
The 2004 allocation was a result of the percentage allocation to
non-controlling interests of the Combined Contribution
Properties and for our predecessor. The 2005 allocation was
allocated to the limited partner unit holders of our operating
partnership.
44
|
|
|
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
Our results of operations for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003 include the accounts of our predecessor through
the date of its contribution to us. Our predecessor is the
largest of the properties contributed in our IPO and therefore
has been identified as the accounting acquirer pursuant to
paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations. As such, the historical financial statements
presented herein for our predecessor were prepared on a
stand-alone basis. The financial information for the Combined
Contribution Properties also is included through the date of
contribution for each property. Subsequent to the dates they
were contributed to us, the financial information for each of
our predecessor and the Combined Contribution Properties is
included in the financial information for BioMed Realty Trust,
which commenced operations on August 11, 2004.
Rental Revenues. Rental revenues increased
$15.1 million to $25.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $10.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily
due to the inclusion of rental revenues for the properties
acquired in connection with our IPO as well as additional
property acquisitions subsequent to our IPO. Rental revenues for
the additional properties acquired during 2004 is net of
amortization of the value recorded for acquired above market
leases and includes amortization of acquired lease obligations
related to below market leases, both related to purchase
accounting entries recorded upon acquisition of the interests in
these properties.
Tenant Recoveries. Revenues from tenant reimbursements
increased $8.6 million to $10.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared to $1.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was
primarily due to the inclusion of tenant reimbursements for the
properties acquired in connection with our IPO as well as
additional property acquisitions subsequent to our IPO.
Rental Operations Expenses. Rental operations expenses
increased $10.8 million to $12.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared to $1.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was
primarily due to the inclusion of rental property operations
expenses for the properties acquired in connection with our IPO
as well as additional property acquisitions subsequent to our
IPO. These expenses include insurance, property taxes and other
operating expenses, most of which were recovered from the
tenants.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased $7.2 million to
$9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $1.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily due to the
inclusion of depreciation and amortization expense for the
properties acquired in connection with our IPO as well as
additional property acquisitions subsequent to our IPO.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and
administrative expenses increased $3.1 million to
$3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $155,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The increase was primarily due to the IPO, the hiring of new
personnel after the IPO, the addition of expenses relating to
operating as a public company, and the compensation expense
related to unvested restricted stock compensation awards accrued
during the period from August 11, 2004 to December 31,
2004.
Interest Income. Interest income increased to $200,000
for the year ended December 31, 2004 from $34,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2003. This is primarily due to
interest earned on funds held by us following the consummation
of the IPO.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased to
$4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $5.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The decrease in interest is a result of
the payoff of notes related to the Bernardo Center Drive and
Balboa Avenue properties in connection with our IPO. In
addition, interest expense was reduced in 2004 due to the
accretion of debt premium, which decreased interest expense by
$307,000.
Minority Interests. Minority interests decreased to
$1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
compared to $1.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The minority interest allocation for
45
2004 and 2003 are not comparable due to the IPO. The 2003
allocation was a result of the percentage allocation to
non-controlling interests of the Combined Contribution
Properties and for our predecessor. The 2004 allocation was
allocated to the limited partner unit holders of our operating
partnership.
|
|
|
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2003 to the
Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
Rental Revenues. Rental revenues increased by $406,000,
or 4.0%, to $10.5 million for 2003 compared to
$10.1 million for 2002. The increase resulted from reduced
rental rates charged during the build-out period for a portion
of the Industrial Road property. Specifically, the tenant
received a temporary rent reduction of $531,000 from October
2001 to October 2002, based on a pre-established formula as
defined in the lease agreement.
Tenant Recoveries. Revenues from tenant reimbursements
remained consistent at approximately $1.5 million for 2003
and 2002.
Rental Operations Expenses. Rental operations expenses
remained consistent at approximately $1.5 million for 2003
and 2002. These expenses include insurance, property taxes and
other operating expenses, most of which were recovered from the
tenants.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and
amortization expense remained consistent at $1.8 million
for 2003 and 2002.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and
administrative expenses remained consistent at $155,000 for 2003
and $161,000 for 2002.
Interest Income. Interest income was $34,000 for 2003
compared to $60,000 for 2002. The decrease was primarily due to
a decrease in an amount due from a tenant for tenant
improvements at the Balboa Avenue property. Additionally, we
earned lower interest rates on cash balances in 2003 compared to
2002.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $383,000,
or 6.7%, to $5.4 million for 2003 compared to
$5.7 million for 2002. This decrease resulted from
reductions in the principal balances outstanding and a decrease
in the interest rate floor (minimum contractual rate) on one of
our variable-rate loans in August 2002. The weighted-average
effective interest rate on our borrowings remained constant at
7.42% from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003.
Minority Interests. Minority interests increased
$462,000, or 38.5%, to $1.7 million for 2003 compared to
$1.2 million in 2002. The increase in minority interest is
a result of the consistent percentage allocation to
non-controlling interests of income before minority interest,
which increased as a result of the changes discussed above.
Funds from Operations
We present funds from operations, or FFO, because we consider it
an important supplemental measure of our operating performance
and believe it is frequently used by securities analysts,
investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of
REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results.
FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and
amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes
that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over
time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or
fallen with market conditions. Because FFO excludes depreciation
and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from
property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a
performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects
the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental
rates, operating costs, development activities and interest
costs, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net
income. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established
by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, in its March 1995 White
Paper (as amended in November 1999 and April 2002). As defined
by NAREIT, FFO represents net income (computed in accordance
with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property,
plus real estate related depreciation and amortization
(excluding amortization of loan origination costs) and after
adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint
46
ventures. Our computation may differ from the methodology for
calculating FFO utilized by other equity REITs and, accordingly,
may not be comparable to such other REITs. Further, FFO does not
represent amounts available for managements discretionary
use because of needed capital replacement or expansion, debt
service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. FFO
should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss)
(computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our
financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities
(computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our
liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our
cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or make
distributions.
The following tables provide the calculation of our FFO and a
reconciliation to net income for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 and for the period from August 11, 2004
through December 31, 2004 (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended | |
|
August 11, 2004 | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
to December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization real estate assets
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$ |
12,554 |
|
|
$ |
13,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
34,148,820 |
|
|
|
33,767,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds
to pay for operating expenses and other expenditures directly
associated with our properties, including:
|
|
|
|
|
interest expense and scheduled principal payments on outstanding
indebtedness, |
|
|
|
general and administrative expenses, |
|
|
|
future distributions expected to be paid to our
stockholders, and |
|
|
|
capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing
commissions. |
We expect to satisfy our short-term liquidity requirements
through our existing working capital and cash provided by our
operations. Our rental revenue, provided by our triple-net
leases, and minimal unreimbursed operating expenses generally
provide cash inflows to meet our debt service obligations, pay
general and administrative expenses, and fund regular
distributions.
Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds
to pay for scheduled debt maturities, renovations, expansions
and other non-recurring capital expenditures that need to be
made periodically and the costs associated with acquisitions of
properties that we pursue. We expect to satisfy our long-term
liquidity requirements through our existing working capital,
cash provided by operations, long-term secured and unsecured
indebtedness, the issuance of additional equity or debt
securities and the use of net proceeds from the disposition of
non-strategic assets. We also expect to use funds available
under our revolving unsecured loan agreement to finance
acquisition and development activities and capital expenditures
on an interim basis.
Our total market capitalization at March 31, 2005 was
approximately $822.7 million based on the market closing
price of our common stock at March 31, 2005 of
$20.60 per share (assuming the conversion of 2,870,564
operating partnership units into common stock) and our debt
outstanding was approximately $116.0 million (exclusive of
unamortized debt premium and accounts payable and accrued
expenses). As a result, our debt-to-total market capitalization
ratio was approximately 14.1% at March 31, 2005. Following
completion of this offering and application of the proceeds, our
ratio of debt-to-total
47
market capitalization will be approximately 33.5% (32.6% if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full). Our
board of directors adopted a policy of limiting our indebtedness
to approximately 60% of our total market capitalization.
However, our board of directors may from time to time modify our
debt policy in light of current economic or market conditions
including, but not limited to, the relative costs of debt and
equity capital, market conditions for debt and equity securities
and fluctuations in the market price of our common stock.
Accordingly, we may increase or decrease our debt to market
capitalization ratio beyond the limit described above.
On May 31, 2005, in order to finance the Lyme portfolio
acquisition and provide additional working capital, we entered
into three credit facilities with KeyBank and other lenders
under which we initially borrowed $485.0 million of a total
of $600.0 million available under these facilities. The
credit facilities include a senior unsecured revolving credit
facility of $250.0 million, under which we initially
borrowed $135.0 million, a senior unsecured term loan
facility of $100.0 million and a senior secured term loan
facility of $250.0 million. We borrowed the full amounts
under the senior unsecured term loan and senior secured term
loan facilities. The senior unsecured facilities have a maturity
date of May 30, 2008 and bear interest at a floating rate
equal to, at our option, either (1) reserve adjusted LIBOR
plus a spread which ranges from 120 to 200 basis points,
depending on our leverage, or (2) the higher of
(a) the prime rate then in effect plus a spread which
ranges from 0 to 50 basis points and (b) the federal
funds rate then in effect plus a spread which ranges from 50 to
100 basis points, in each case, depending on our leverage.
The secured credit facility has a maturity date of May 30,
2010 and bears interest at a floating rate equal to, at our
option, either (1) reserve adjusted LIBOR plus
225 basis points or (2) the higher of (a) the
prime rate then in effect plus 50 basis points and
(b) the federal funds rate then in effect plus
100 basis points and is initially secured by 13 properties.
The secured facility is also secured by our interest in any
distributions from these properties and a pledge of the equity
interests in a subsidiary owning one of these properties. We may
not prepay the secured term loan facility prior to May 2006. We
entered into an interest rate swap agreement in connection with
the closing of the credit facilities, which will have the effect
of fixing the interest rate on the $250.0 million secured
term loan at approximately 6.4%.
The terms of these credit facilities include certain
restrictions and covenants, which limit, among other things, the
payment of dividends, and the incurrence of additional
indebtedness and liens. The terms also require compliance with
financial ratios relating to the minimum amounts of net worth,
fixed charge coverage, unsecured debt service coverage, leverage
ratio, interest coverage, the maximum amount of unsecured,
secured and recourse indebtedness, and certain investment
limitations. The dividend restriction referred to above provides
that, except to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT for
federal income tax purposes, we will not during any four
consecutive quarters make distributions with respect to common
stock or other equity interests in an aggregate amount in excess
of 95% of funds from operations or 100% of funds available for
distribution, each as defined, for such period, subject to other
adjustments. These credit facilities specify a number of events
of default (some of which are subject to applicable cure
periods), including, among others, the failure to make payments
when due, noncompliance with covenants and defaults under other
agreements or instruments of indebtedness. Upon the occurrence
of an event of default, the lenders may terminate the facilities
and declare all amounts outstanding to be immediately due and
payable.
On December 28, 2004, we completed a $49.3 million,
five-year mortgage financing with The Northwestern Mutual Life
Insurance Company at a rate of 4.55% per annum that matures
on January 1, 2010. We may prepay the loan in full upon
payment of a 1% fee. The debt is secured by three properties:
Towne Centre Drive, Monte Villa Parkway and Bayshore Boulevard.
The proceeds were used in part to repay outstanding borrowings
under our revolving credit facility.
48
A summary of our outstanding consolidated secured indebtedness
as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Fixed | |
|
Effective | |
|
|
|
Unamortized | |
|
Value at | |
|
Value at | |
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Principal | |
|
Premium | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
Rate | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Maturity Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ardentech Court
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
$ |
4,807 |
|
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
5,398 |
|
|
$ |
5,440 |
|
|
|
July 1, 2012 |
|
Bayshore Boulevard
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
16,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,378 |
|
|
|
16,438 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
Bridgeview
|
|
|
8.07 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
11,798 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
13,578 |
|
|
|
13,681 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
Eisenhower Road
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
May 5, 2008 |
|
Elliott Avenue
|
|
|
7.38 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
16,881 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
17,898 |
|
|
|
18,107 |
|
|
|
November 24, 2007 |
|
Monte Villa Parkway
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
Science Center Drive
|
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
|
13,376 |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
Towne Centre Drive
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
22,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,774 |
|
|
|
22,856 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,520 |
|
|
$ |
5,074 |
|
|
$ |
101,594 |
|
|
$ |
102,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding secured notes payable due to affiliates as of
December 31, 2003 was repaid on August 17, 2004.
Mortgage debt aggregating $77.0 million secured by the King
of Prussia property was repaid in August 2004 concurrent with
the purchase of the property. Premiums were recorded upon
assumption of the notes at the time of the related acquisition
to account for above-market interest rates. Amortization of
these premiums is recorded as a reduction to interest expense
over the remaining term of the respective note.
As of March 31, 2005, principal payments due for our
consolidated indebtedness were as follows (in thousands and
excluding unamortized premiums):
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,456 |
|
2006
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
2007
|
|
|
37,112 |
|
2008
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
69,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
We may in the future continue to enter into derivative financial
instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks
in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related
financial instrument. In connection with the KeyBank
$250.0 million secured term loan, we have entered into an
interest rate swap agreement, which will have the effect of
fixing the interest rate on the $250.0 million secured term
loan at approximately 6.4%. However, we were not a party to any
derivative financial instruments at March 31, 2005.
Further, we do not enter into derivative or interest rate
transactions for speculative or trading purposes.
49
The following table provides information with respect to our
contractual obligations at March 31, 2005, including the
maturities and scheduled principal repayments and related
interest payments of our secured debt. We were not subject to
any material capital lease obligations or unconditional purchase
obligations as of March 31, 2005.
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation |
|
of 2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Mortgage notes payable(1)
|
|
$ |
5,787 |
|
|
$ |
7,718 |
|
|
$ |
23,126 |
|
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,833 |
|
|
$ |
73,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured line of credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share of secured debt of unconsolidated partnership(2)
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
2,159 |
|
Tenant obligations(3)
|
|
|
9,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction projects
|
|
|
3,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
18,640 |
|
|
$ |
7,937 |
|
|
$ |
42,845 |
|
|
$ |
8,219 |
|
|
$ |
6,052 |
|
|
$ |
75,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Balance excludes $5.1 million of unamortized debt premium. |
|
(2) |
Balance excludes $385,000 of unamortized debt premium. |
|
(3) |
Committed tenant-related obligations based on executed leases as
of March 31, 2005. |
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2005, we had an investment in McKellar
Court, L.P., which owns a single tenant occupied property
located in San Diego. The acquisition of the investment in
McKellar Court closed on September 30, 2004. McKellar Court
is a variable interest entity as defined in Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities;
however, we are not the primary beneficiary. The limited partner
is also the only tenant in the property and will bear a
disproportionate amount of any losses. We, as the general
partner, will receive 21% of the operating cash flows and 75% of
the gains upon sale of the property. We account for our general
partner interest using the equity method. Significant accounting
policies used by the unconsolidated partnership that owns this
property are similar to those used by us. At March 31,
2005, our share of the debt related to this investment was equal
to approximately $2.3 million (excluding unamortized debt
premium). The assets and liabilities of McKellar Court were
$18.9 million and $12.9 million, respectively, at
March 31, 2005. The table below summarizes our share of the
outstanding debt (based on our respective ownership interests)
of this investment at March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed | |
|
Effective | |
|
|
|
Unamortized | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Principal | |
|
Premium | |
|
Book | |
|
|
|
|
Rate | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
Maturity Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
McKellar Court
|
|
|
8.56 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
2,656 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
50
Cash Flows
The following summary discussion of our cash flows is based on
the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows included
in the Financial Statements in this prospectus and is not meant
to be an all inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash
flows for the periods presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
Contribution | |
|
|
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
Properties | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
10,062 |
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
8,925 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
|
(1,254 |
) |
|
|
11,090 |
|
Ending cash balance
|
|
|
15,570 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
15,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor and | |
|
|
|
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
|
|
Trust, Inc. and | |
|
Contribution | |
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
Properties | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
13,959 |
|
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
|
$ |
9,576 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(456,680 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(456,575 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
470,433 |
|
|
|
(4,563 |
) |
|
|
474,996 |
|
Ending cash balance
|
|
|
27,869 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
27,514 |
|
Our statements of cash flows and those of our predecessor have
been combined for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
statements of cash flows of our predecessor have been combined
with those of the Combined Contribution Properties for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and the year ended
December 31, 2003 because management does not consider the
cash flows of our predecessor on a stand-alone basis to be
indicative of the historical cash flows of our company taken as
a whole.
|
|
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 |
Cash and cash equivalents were $15.6 million and $238,000,
respectively, at March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004.
Net cash provided by operating activities increased
$8.9 million to $10.0 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 compared to $1.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was
primarily due to the increases in operating income before
depreciation and amortization, and changes in other operating
assets and liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $32.2 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $0 for
the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase was
primarily due to $33.0 million paid to acquire interests in
real estate entities and funds held in escrow for acquisitions
partially offset by receipts of master lease payments.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased
$11.1 million to $9.8 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 compared to cash used of
$1.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004. The increase was primarily due to borrowings under our
revolving unsecured loan agreement offset by principal payments
on mortgage loans, and payments of dividends and distributions.
|
|
|
Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2004 to the
Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased
$9.6 million to $14.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $4.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily
due to the acquisition of properties acquired in connection with
our IPO.
51
Net cash used in investing activities increased
$456.6 million to $456.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $105,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The increase was primarily due to
$459.2 million paid to acquire properties, funds held in
escrow for acquisitions, and the repayment of related party
payables, partially offset by funds received from prior owners
for security deposits and tenant improvements and receipts of
master lease payments.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased
$475.0 million to $470.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to net cash used of
$4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
increase was primarily due to the net proceeds received from the
IPO of our common stock on August 11, 2004 and the exercise
of the underwriters over-allotment option on
August 16, 2004, offset by the payment of offering costs,
principal payments on secured notes payable, the payment of loan
costs, distributions to owners of the predecessor, and dividends
paid to stockholders.
Cash and cash equivalents were $27.9 million and $355,000
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Cash Distribution Policy
We will elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing
with our taxable year ended December 31, 2004. To qualify
as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and
operational requirements, including the requirement that we
distribute currently at least 90% of our ordinary taxable income
to our stockholders. It is our intention to comply with these
requirements and maintain our REIT status. As a REIT, we
generally will not be subject to corporate federal, state or
local income taxes on taxable income we distribute currently (in
accordance with the Code and applicable regulations) to our
stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable
year, we will be subject to federal, state and local income
taxes at regular corporate rates and may not be able to qualify
as a REIT for subsequent tax years. Even if we qualify for
federal taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state
and local taxes on our income and to federal income and excise
taxes on our undistributed taxable income,
i.e., taxable income not distributed in the amounts
and in the time frames prescribed by the Code and applicable
regulations thereunder.
Since our IPO through March 31, 2005, we have declared
aggregate dividends on our common stock and distributions on our
operating partnership units of $0.6897 per common share and
unit, representing a full quarterly dividend for each of the
fourth quarter of 2004 and first quarter of 2005 of $0.27 per
common share and unit and a partial third quarter dividend for
2004 of $0.1497 per common share and unit. The dividends
are equivalent to an annual rate of $1.08 per common share
and unit.
Inflation
Some of our leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the
adverse impact of inflation. These provisions generally increase
rental rates during the terms of the leases either at fixed
rates or indexed escalations (based on the Consumer Price Index
or other measures). We may be adversely impacted by inflation on
the leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. In
addition, most of our leases require the tenant to pay an
allocable share of operating expenses, including common area
maintenance costs, real estate taxes and insurance. This may
reduce our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses
resulting from inflation, assuming our properties remain leased
and tenants fulfill their obligations to reimburse us for such
expenses.
Our revolving loan agreement and our new credit facilities bear
interest at a variable rate, which, to the extent not adequately
hedged, will be influenced by changes in short-term interest
rates, and will be sensitive to inflation.
Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, or SFAS 123R. SFAS 123R
replaces SFAS 123. SFAS 123R requires the compensation
cost relating to share-based
52
payment transactions be recognized in financial statements and
be measured based on the fair value of the equity instrument
issued. SFAS 123R is effective in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, our
equity issuances for compensation have consisted entirely of
restricted stock grants to directors and employees. We do not
believe that the treatment of our restricted stock grants under
SFAS 123R differ from the treatment under SFAS 123. As
a result, we do not expect the adoption of SFAS 123R to
have a material impact on our results of operations, financial
position or liquidity. On April 14, 2005, the Securities
and Exchange Commission announced a deferral of the effective
date of SFAS 123R for calendar year companies until the
beginning of 2006.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchange of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion
No. 29, or SFAS 153. The amendments made by
SFAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of
nonmonetary assets should be measured on the fair value of
assets exchanged. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception for
nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces
it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets
that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 is
effective for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not expect the
adoption of SFAS 153 to have a material impact on our
results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to
financial instruments depend upon prevailing market interest
rates. Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from
changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates,
commodity prices and equity prices. The primary market risk to
which we believe we are exposed is interest rate risk. Many
factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies,
domestic and international economic and political considerations
and other factors that are beyond our control contribute to
interest rate risk.
As of March 31, 2005, our consolidated debt consisted of
eight fixed-rate notes with a carrying value of
$101.6 million (including $5.1 million of unamortized
premium) and a weighted-average effective interest rate of 4.71%
and our credit facility with an outstanding balance of
$19.5 million and a weighted-average variable interest rate
of 4.03%. To determine fair value, the fixed-rate debt is
discounted at a rate based on an estimate of current lending
rates, assuming the debt is outstanding through maturity and
considering the notes collateral. At March 31, 2005,
the fair value of the fixed-rate debt was estimated to be
$99.0 million compared to the net carrying value of
$101.6 million (including $5.1 million of unamortized
premium). We do not believe that the interest rate risk
represented by our fixed rate debt was material as of
March 31, 2005 in relation to total assets of
$601.6 million and equity market capitalization of
$706.7 million of our common stock and operating units. At
March 31, 2005, the fair value of the debt of our
investment in unconsolidated partnership approximated the
carrying value.
If interest rates were to increase by 10%, or 40 basis
points, the increase in interest expense on our
$19.5 million in variable rate debt would decrease future
annual earnings and cash flows by approximately $72,000. If
interest rates were to decrease by 10%, or 40 basis points,
the decrease in interest expense on our $19.5 million in
variable rate debt would increase our future annual earnings and
cash flows by approximately $72,000.
These amounts were determined by considering the impact of
hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments. These
analyses do not consider the effect of any change in overall
economic activity that could occur in that environment. Further,
in the event of a change of the magnitude discussed above, we
may take actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change.
However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that
would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume
no changes in our financial structure.
In order to modify and manage the interest rate characteristics
of our outstanding debt and to limit the effects of interest
rate risks on our operations, we may utilize a variety of
financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps and
treasury locks in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a
related financial instrument. The use of these types of
instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in interest
53
rates carries additional risks, including counterparty credit
risk, the enforceability of hedging contracts and the risk that
unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates will
cause a significant loss of basis in the contract. To limit
counterparty credit risk we will seek to enter into such
agreements with major financial institutions with high credit
ratings. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
adequately protect against the foregoing risks and will
ultimately realize an economic benefit that exceeds the related
amounts incurred in connection with engaging in such hedging
activities. We do not enter into such contracts for speculative
or trading purposes. For the period from August 11, 2004 to
March 31, 2005, we were not a party to any such financial
instruments. In connection with the KeyBank $250.0 million
secured term loan, we have entered into an interest rate swap
agreement, which will have the effect of fixing the interest
rate on the $250.0 million secured term loan at
approximately 6.4%.
54
BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES
Business Overview
We are a REIT focused on acquiring, developing, owning, leasing
and managing laboratory and office space for the life science
industry. Our tenants include biotechnology and pharmaceutical
companies, scientific research institutions, government agencies
and other entities involved in the life science industry. Our
current properties and our primary acquisition targets are
located in markets with well established reputations as centers
for scientific research, including Boston, San Diego,
San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania and
New York/ New Jersey.
We completed an IPO of our common stock in August 2004 and
raised net proceeds of approximately $429.3 million. In
connection with the IPO, we acquired 13 properties with an
aggregate of 2.3 million rentable square feet of laboratory
and office space. Since the completion of the IPO, we have
acquired an additional 20 properties with an aggregate of
2.0 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space for aggregate cash consideration of $546.9 million
and the assumption of $143.0 million of debt. As of
May 31, 2005, we owned 33 properties with an aggregate of
4.3 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space. Our properties were approximately 92.2% leased to
76 tenants. Of the remaining unleased space, approximately
149,412 square feet, or 3.5% of our total rentable square
footage, was under redevelopment.
On May 31, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the Lyme
portfolio, described below under Lyme
Portfolio Properties. The Lyme portfolio consists of ten
buildings with an aggregate of approximately 1.1 million
rentable square feet of laboratory and office space which is
currently 96.8% leased with an average remaining term of ten
years, and includes the parking structure with 447 parking
spaces. The purchase price was $523.6 million, excluding
closing costs, and was funded through borrowings under three
credit facilities with KeyBank and other lenders and the
assumption of approximately $131.2 of indebtedness.
Our senior management team has significant experience in the
real estate industry, principally focusing on properties
designed for life science tenants. We operate as a fully
integrated, self-administered and self-managed REIT, providing
management, leasing, development and administrative services to
our properties.
Our executive offices are located at 17140 Bernardo Center
Drive, Suite 222, San Diego, California 92128. Our
telephone number at that location is (858) 485-9840. Our
website is located at www.biomedrealty.com. The information
found on, or otherwise accessible through, our website is not
incorporated into, and does not form a part of, this prospectus
or any other report or document we file with or furnish to the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
55
Industry Overview
The life science industry represents a large and fast growing
segment of the U.S. economy. In 2004, according to CMS,
health care spending grew 7.5% to an estimated
$1.8 trillion, representing 15.4% of U.S. gross
domestic product, and annual health care spending is projected
to grow faster than the broader economy for the next ten years,
reaching $3.6 trillion in 2014, representing 18.7% of
U.S. gross domestic product, as shown in the chart below.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in the
health services industry is forecasted to grow at approximately
twice the rate of the broader economy. In addition, according to
a 2001 study by Research!America, it was estimated that for
every dollar spent on health care $0.06 was spent on research,
which would represent approximately $100 billion in 2003.
Within the life science industry, we primarily focus on the
following tenants: biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies,
scientific research institutions and government agencies.
National Health Expenditures and Their Share of Gross
Domestic Product, 1994-2014
Source: CMS
56
Biotechnology is a large and growing, well-financed segment of
total health care spending and employment. According to NDC
Health, the market for prescription drugs accounted for
approximately $251 billion in 2004, and has grown 51.2%
since 2000. This revenue growth has been supported by
significant increases in research and development spending. In
the 2004 Ernst & Young Global Biotechnology Report
issued in June 2004, or E&Y Report, Ernst & Young
LLP estimates that public U.S. biotechnology companies
spent $13.6 billion on research and development in 2003,
representing a 101% increase since 1998. Ernst & Young
estimates that this sector received approximately
$75 billion in total financings. Also, since 1998,
biotechnology employment by public U.S. biotechnology
companies has grown 38% to an aggregate of
146,100 employees. The strengthening financial condition of
the biotechnology industry is reflected in the revenue growth
demonstrated in the chart below, with revenues growing from
$12 billion in 1994 to $36 billion in 2003.
Domestic Biotechnology Revenues
Source:
Ernst & Young LLP
57
Pharmaceutical companies are an important segment of the life
science industry. Pharmaceutical companies not only require
increasing amounts of research and development space but
directly and indirectly drive demand for additional life science
facilities. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America, or PhRMA, estimates that the domestic pharmaceutical
industry spent approximately $27.1 billion on research and
development in 2003, an increase of 158% in the last ten years
(as shown below), and has increased this spending every year
since 1970. Over the same period, domestic pharmaceutical sales
increased over 200%. Research and development spending has
benefited from this sales growth, as well as more complex
disease targets and a more extensive regulatory process.
Domestic Pharmaceutical R&D Expenditures
Source:
PhRMA
|
|
|
Scientific Research Institutions |
Demand for our space is also driven by university and non-profit
research institute spending. These institutions directly drive
the demand for laboratory space through their own research
efforts and indirectly through funding private sector research
and supplying access to their research facilities and equipment.
For example, the Scripps Research Institute in San Diego
utilizes over one million square feet of laboratory space and
employs more than 2,800 scientists, technicians and other
professionals. Other examples of non-profit research
institutions in our target markets include the American Heart
Association, the American Lung Association, the American Cancer
Society, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, the
Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, the National Cancer
Institute, the Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research and
the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Universities and
research hospitals such as the University of California,
San Diego, the University of California,
San Francisco, Stanford University, Johns Hopkins
University, the University of Pennsylvania, Princeton
University, Columbia University, Harvard University and
Massachusetts General Hospital also have active research and
development efforts and are important drivers of demand for
rental space in the markets in which they operate.
58
Government Agencies
A fourth major demand driver and tenant focus for us is federal
and state government agencies. Government agencies drive the
need for space directly through their research and development
programs and indirectly through research funding provided to
university, non-profit research institutes and for-profit life
science entities. The National Institutes of Health alone has an
approved budget of $26.9 billion for research and
development spending for 2004, and its total annual expenditures
have increased from approximately $10.3 billion in 1994 to
approximately $25.2 billion in 2003, as shown below. Other
federal government agencies that fund health care research
include: the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food
and Drug Administration, or FDA, the Department of Homeland
Security, the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department
of Agriculture. These efforts are also supplemented by research
grants and tax benefits from state and local government programs
and agencies.
R&D Expenditures by the National Institutes of Health
Source:
National Institutes of Health
We believe that there is a high likelihood for continued growth
in the life science industry due to several factors, including
(1) the existing high level of and continuing increase in
research and development expenditures, (2) the aging of the
U.S. population resulting from the transition of baby
boomers to senior citizens, which has increased the demand for
new drugs and services, and (3) escalating health care
costs, which drive the demand for better drugs, less expensive
treatments and more services in an attempt to manage such costs.
Life Science Real Estate Characteristics
Life science entities desire properties that are strategically
located near leading academic and research institutions and that
have unique design and construction requirements to accommodate
their research, development, clinical testing and product
development needs. To accommodate the additional building
infrastructure and tenant owned furniture, fixtures and
equipment, properties are designed with enhanced structural
floor rigidity and load bearing capacities ranging between 100
and 150 pounds per square foot and unobstructed floor-to-ceiling
clear heights of 12.5 to 16 feet. In contrast, many of the
existing multi-story office buildings in the market today have
elevated floors with structural load bearing capacities ranging
between 60 and 80 pounds per square foot and floor-to-ceiling
clear heights of only 10.5 to twelve
59
feet. Also, properties must have enhanced electrical, plumbing
and HVAC systems. In addition, due to the critical nature of the
tenants operations, life science properties typically
require building systems to have significant excess capacity not
found in generic office or industrial space.
As an example, a typical office space environment cycles the
volume of air within the space four to six times per hour using
10% to 20% of fresh outside air with the balance of the air
re-circulated. A typical life science laboratory space
environment cycles the volume of air within the space ten to 15
times per hour using 100% fresh air. This differential in the
amount of fresh air and volume cycles significantly increases
the amount and size of the facilities electrical, plumbing
and HVAC equipment needs.
Historically, the markets for properties designed for life
science tenants with laboratory space have been characterized by
fragmented ownership and scarce market data, with a limited
number of institutional investors investing in and owning life
science properties. Limited familiarity with the unique aspects
of the property type and the high cost per square foot compared
to traditional office and warehouse property have led to a lack
of participation from traditional commercial property lenders in
the sector. The limited access to cost-effective debt financing
has in turn resulted in a limited number of competitors with the
requisite expertise and access to capital necessary to acquire,
develop and own properties designed for life science tenants.
Target Markets
We focus our investment efforts in seven key markets: Boston,
San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland,
Pennsylvania and New York/ New Jersey. These target markets have
emerged as primary hubs for research and development and
production in the life science industry. These markets generally
have reputations for scientific excellence and are often
associated with a concentration of academic centers. Each
markets reputation for scientific excellence is enhanced
by having some mature health care companies in the region which
provide scale and stability to the market, in addition to a
regular supply of new startups, which are drawn to the market by
the ability to leverage off of the existing industry
infrastructure. Furthermore, these markets generally provide a
high quality of life for the skilled workforce. Unless otherwise
noted, the following information regarding our target markets
was provided in the Rosen Study.
The Boston life science market has approximately
14.0 million rentable square feet of life science space,
the majority of which is located in the Cambridge sub-market.
Demand for laboratory and office space in this market is driven
by its proximity to several prominent universities and research
institutions, including Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Harvard University, the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical
Research, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Massachusetts
General Hospital. The New England area, including Connecticut,
Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island, is listed
in the E&Y Report as having 51 publicly traded biotechnology
companies. This list includes Genzyme Corporation, Biogen Idec
Inc. and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., each of which is
located in the Boston area.
Over the course of the last several decades, San Diego has
emerged as one of the primary centers for life science research
and development, driven in large part by the concentration of
academic centers, including the University of California,
San Diego, the Scripps Research Institute and the Salk
Institute for Biological Studies. The San Diego market has
approximately 14.0 million rentable square feet of life
science space. A significant portion of the biotechnology
research effort is concentrated in a relatively high-density
area of La Jolla, a suburb of San Diego, and its
surrounding area. San Diego is listed in the E&Y Report
as having 27 publicly traded biotechnology companies,
including Elan Corporation, plc, Ligand Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated, Quidel Corporation and Invitrogen Corporation.
60
The San Francisco life science market has approximately
26.0 million rentable square feet of life science space and
has emerged as one of the largest life science centers in the
United States. The San Francisco Bay area is listed in the
E&Y Report as having 59 publicly traded biotechnology
companies, including Genentech, Inc., Alza Corporation, Chiron
Corporation, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Nektar Therapeutics.
Other regional drivers include Stanford University, the
University of California, Berkeley and the University of
California, San Francisco. A significant portion of the
biotechnology research effort is concentrated near
Genentechs corporate headquarters in South
San Francisco.
The Seattle life science market has approximately
6.5 million rentable square feet of life science space and
is driven primarily by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
Center and the University of Washington. The Pacific Northwest
region, including Oregon and Washington, is listed in the
E&Y Report as having 19 publicly traded biotechnology
companies. These companies include Amgen Inc. (Helix campus),
ICOS Corporation, ZymoGenetics, Inc. and Cell Therapeutics,
Inc., each of which is located in the Seattle area.
The Maryland life science market has approximately
10.0 million rentable square feet of life science space and
is driven by its proximity to government health agencies,
including the FDA, the National Institutes of Health, the
Department of Homeland Security and the National Cancer
Institute, and several universities and institutes, such as
Johns Hopkins University, the University of Maryland and the
Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The Mid-Atlantic market,
including Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C., is
listed in the E&Y Report as having 20 publicly traded
biotechnology companies, including Medimmune, Inc., Human Genome
Sciences, Inc. and Celera Genomics group, a business segment of
Applera Corporation. Each of these entities is located in
Maryland.
The Pennsylvania life science market has approximately
3.8 million rentable square feet of life science space and
is driven by several research institutions and biotechnology
companies, including the University of Pennsylvania,
Pennsylvania State University, the University Science Center,
The Wistar Institute and Hershey Medical Center. The
Pennsylvania/ Delaware Valley market is listed in the E&Y
Report as having eleven publicly traded biotechnology companies,
including Cephalon, Inc., Centocor, Inc. and Neose Technologies,
Inc.
The New York/ New Jersey life science market has approximately
13.5 million rentable square feet of life science space and
is driven by several research institutions, large pharmaceutical
companies and biotechnology companies, including Princeton
University, Columbia University, New York University, Rutgers
University, Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research,
Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Wyeth
and Pfizer Inc. This region is listed in the E&Y Report as
having 42 publicly traded biotechnology companies,
including Celgene Corporation, Immunomedics, Inc., Lifecell
Corporation, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Emisphere Technologies, Inc. and
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Our Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to own, acquire, lease, manage and
selectively develop laboratory and office space for lease to
life science tenants in our target markets. This highly focused
business strategy, coupled with our management expertise,
provides significant internal and external growth opportunities.
61
Our internal growth strategy is designed to maximize
distributions to our stockholders by capitalizing on our
significant management expertise through the following means:
|
|
|
|
|
Maximize occupancy. We believe our access to
cost-effective capital enables us to finance tenant improvements
and lease our available space to high quality tenants. We
believe that this maximizes occupancy and drives revenue growth. |
|
|
|
Contractual rental rate increases. Our leases generally
include annual rent escalations, which provide us with
predictable and consistent earnings growth. |
|
|
|
Tenant monitoring. We closely monitor changes in our
existing tenants financial position, prospects and
creditworthiness in order to identify and address opportunities
to renew, extend or modify existing leases and find additional
expansion opportunities. |
|
|
|
Opportunistic laboratory space conversions. We
continually evaluate opportunities to convert existing office
and industrial space into laboratory space and significantly
increase our return on invested capital. |
|
|
|
Tenant financed improvements. Our tenants generally
contribute tenant improvements necessary to conform a property
to their specific needs. These upfront costs and the requirement
that many of these improvements remain with the property upon
lease termination afford us the opportunity to substantially
increase rental rates at the end of the lease, provide built-in
growth above contractual rent increases and serve as a
significant incentive for the tenant to renew its lease. |
Based on our management teams extensive acquisition
experience and its established network of informal relationships
through past business dealings with existing and potential life
science tenants, property owners and real estate brokers, we
believe that we are well-positioned to be a significant acquirer
in a fragmented niche of the real estate industry. According to
the Rosen Study, our target markets have in excess of
87.0 million rentable square feet of life science real
estate, not including owner-occupied properties. Also, according
to the Rosen Study, the average market occupancy rate for life
science real estate in these markets is seven percentage points
greater than the occupancy rate for generic office properties.
Our acquisition focus is to buy properties leased to high
quality life science tenants at attractive cash-on-cash yields
with potential upside through lease-up, redevelopment or
additional development. Our acquisition strategy is a real
estate-based formulation, combining extensive tenant analysis
and risk-based underwriting. Our acquisition strategy includes:
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Underwriting. Our primary consideration is
the location of a property in relation to academic and research
institutions and other demand generators in our target markets,
a critical factor in determining long-term value. In addition,
we assess the propertys suitability for life science
tenants and the amount of generic laboratory space in order to
maximize the flexibility to attract new or replacement tenants.
We also focus on the building improvements financed by the
tenant, which provide significant downside protection to our
investment while increasing tenant retention and providing
future rental increases. Next, we consider the propertys
basic design and construction and its ability to accommodate
life science tenants. Features we examine include, among others,
floor-to-ceiling clear heights, floor rigidity and load bearing
capacity, and electrical, plumbing and HVAC systems. We
generally seek to acquire properties with generic laboratory
space (space that we can easily convert to support alternative
uses within the life science industry). We believe we can more
easily re-lease such space to future tenants or convert it to
multi-tenant use. |
|
|
|
Tenant Credit Analysis. Our tenant credit analysis
considers three key elements in evaluating prospective tenants:
(1) financial condition, (2) management team and
(3) scientific focus. We perform a thorough review of the
prospective tenants financial statements, considering the
current |
62
|
|
|
|
|
liquidity and cash resources as well as the tenants
prospects for raising additional capital. We meet with the
prospective tenants senior management team in order to
evaluate the quality of the management team, their scientific
focus and their ability to raise capital. In addition, we review
the prospective tenants investors and/or venture capital
partners in order to obtain further validation of the
tenants prospects. In order to assess the viability of the
prospective tenants scientific focus, we rely on our
contacts in the scientific community to provide insight on the
prospective tenant and its competitors. |
|
|
|
Lease Structuring. After careful consideration of the
subject property and the prospective tenant, we analyze our
leases to provide the appropriate economic return based on our
risk assessment. Depending on the business plan for each
individual property, our leases generally range from five to
15 years, with extension options, and include a fixed
rental rate with scheduled annual escalations. The leases
typically are triple-net. In addition, our tenants typically are
responsible for capital improvements necessary to maintain the
property in its original condition. Accordingly, we believe that
we will have the capability to substantially increase the number
of properties we own and manage without proportionate increases
in overhead costs. Under some of the leases, we may remain
responsible for the repair and maintenance of the foundation,
exterior walls and other structural components of the building. |
In addition to the heavily improved nature of generic laboratory
space, a significant amount of tenant improvements are made by
the tenant in order to conform the property to the tenants
specific needs. While we may pay for a limited portion of these
improvements, tenants generally bear the majority of these
costs. These sunk costs serve as a significant incentive for the
tenant to remain in the property, increasing the likelihood that
they renew their leases upon expiration. Furthermore, when
tenants do leave, they generally are required under their leases
to leave tenant improvements with the property, which in turn
enhances our ability to attract new tenants. These tenant
improvements typically include wall-coverings, carpeting,
flooring, built-in cabinet and laboratory casework, paneling,
electrical, mechanical and plumbing equipment and related ducts,
shafts and conduits, gas and air delivery systems, autoclaves
and glassware sterilization equipment, exterior venting fume
hoods, walk-in freezers and refrigerators, clean-rooms,
climatized rooms, electrical panels, circuits and back-up power
distribution systems.
Property Portfolio
At May 31, 2005, our portfolio consisted of
33 properties, which included 56 buildings with an
aggregate of approximately 4.3 million rentable square feet
of laboratory and office space. We also owned undeveloped land
that we estimate can support up to 548,000 rentable square feet
of laboratory and office space.
The following summarizes our existing portfolio at May 31,
2005 by location:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Rentable | |
|
Rentable | |
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
Percent | |
|
Rent | |
|
|
of | |
|
Square | |
|
Square | |
|
Percent | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
Annualized | |
|
Per Leased | |
Market |
|
Properties | |
|
Feet | |
|
Feet | |
|
Leased | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
Rent | |
|
Square Foot | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Boston
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1,270,365 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
$ |
47,383 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
% |
|
$ |
37.92 |
|
New York/New Jersey
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
823,948 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
88 |
% |
|
|
14,253 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
19.66 |
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
717,970 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
14,078 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
22.00 |
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
559,259 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
10,221 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
19.86 |
|
San Diego(1)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
529,641 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
14,397 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
30.66 |
|
Seattle
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
185,989 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
6,819 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
36.67 |
|
Maryland
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
168,817 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
15.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average:
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
4,255,989 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
$ |
109,776 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
27.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 72,863 square feet (or 1.7% of the portfolio) of
an unconsolidated partnership, of which we own 21%. |
63
The following table sets forth information related to the
properties we owned, or had an ownership interest in, as of
May 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
Rentable | |
|
Rentable | |
|
Approximate | |
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
Percent | |
|
Rent Per | |
|
|
|
|
of | |
|
Year Built/ | |
|
Square | |
|
Square | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Percent | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
Annualized | |
|
Leased | |
|
|
Property Location |
|
Buildings | |
|
Renovated | |
|
Feet | |
|
Feet | |
|
Lab Space | |
|
Leased | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
Rent | |
|
Square Foot | |
|
Primary Tenant | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Boston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kendall Square D(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
349,325 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
98 |
% |
|
$ |
15,397 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
$ |
44.89 |
|
|
|
Genzyme Corporation |
|
Kendall Square A(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
302,919 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
14,536 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
49.61 |
|
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
|
Sidney Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
191,904 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
21.17 |
|
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
|
40 Erie Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
|
100,854 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
40.63 |
|
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
|
Fresh Pond Research Park(1)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1948/2002 |
|
|
|
90,702 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
13.59 |
|
|
|
Curis |
|
Albany Street
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1922/1998 |
|
|
|
75,003 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
46.21 |
|
|
Millennium Pharmaceuticals |
Vassar Street(2)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1950/1998 |
|
|
|
52,520 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
26.13 |
|
|
|
Monsanto Company |
|
21 Erie Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1925/2004 |
|
|
|
48,238 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
27.46 |
|
|
|
Metabolix |
|
Coolidge Avenue(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1962/1999 |
|
|
|
37,400 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
25.00 |
|
|
|
V.I. Technologies |
|
Lucent Drive(1)(3)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
25.49 |
|
|
Trustees of Dartmouth College |
47 Erie Street Parking Structure(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
Various |
|
New York/New Jersey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Landmark at Eastview(4)
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1958/1999 |
|
|
|
751,648 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
14,105 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
19.75 |
|
|
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals |
|
Graphics Drive
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1992/2001 |
|
|
|
72,300 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
13.86 |
|
|
|
Medeikon |
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridgeview
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1977/2002 |
|
|
|
263,073 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
12.78 |
|
|
|
Cell Genesys |
|
Bayshore Boulevard
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
183,344 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,203 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
22.92 |
|
|
|
Intermune |
|
Industrial Road(5)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
171,965 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
5,480 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
38.67 |
|
|
|
Nektar Therapeutics |
|
Ardentech Court
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1997/2001 |
|
|
|
55,588 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
18.17 |
|
|
|
Vicuron Pharmaceuticals |
|
Dumbarton Circle
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1990 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
14.37 |
|
|
|
ARYx Therapeutics |
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King of Prussia(6)
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1954/2004 |
|
|
|
427,109 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
9,060 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
21.21 |
|
|
|
Centocor |
|
Phoenixville Pike
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1989 |
|
|
|
104,400 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
13.13 |
|
|
|
Cephalon |
|
Eisenhower Road
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1973/2000 |
|
|
|
27,750 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
13.60 |
|
|
|
Crane Environmental |
|
San Diego
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towne Centre Drive(7)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
115,870 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
33.00 |
|
|
|
Illumina |
|
Bunker Hill Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1973/2002 |
|
|
|
105,364 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
3,137 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
35.50 |
|
|
|
SCVSI |
|
McKellar Court(8)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1988 |
|
|
|
72,863 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
22.94 |
|
|
|
Quidel Corporation |
|
Bernardo Center Drive(9)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1974/1992 |
|
|
|
61,286 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
34.48 |
|
|
University of California Regents |
Science Center Drive
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
53,740 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
30.88 |
|
|
|
Ligand Pharmaceuticals |
|
Waples Street(1)(10)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1983 |
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
None (under redevelopment) |
Nancy Ridge Drive
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1983/2001 |
|
|
|
42,138 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
32.03 |
|
|
|
BioMedica |
|
Balboa Avenue
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1968/2000 |
|
|
|
35,344 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
18.18 |
|
|
General Services Administration |
Seattle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elliott Avenue
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1925/1984 |
|
|
|
134,989 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
5,204 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
38.55 |
|
|
|
Chiron Corporation |
|
Monte Villa Parkway
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1996/2002 |
|
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
31.67 |
|
|
|
Nastech Pharmaceutical |
|
Maryland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tributary Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1983/1998 |
|
|
|
91,592 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
11.46 |
|
|
|
Guilford Pharmaceuticals |
|
Beckley Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
77,225 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
20.39 |
|
|
|
Guilford Pharmaceuticals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted Average
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,255,989 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
92 |
% |
|
$ |
109,776 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
27.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) This property is managed by a third-party not
affiliated with us.
(2) Monsanto Company is the guarantor under the sublease of
its wholly owned subsidiary Cereon Genomics, LLC.
(3) Located in Lebanon, New Hampshire.
|
|
(4) |
We own a leasehold interest in the property through a 99-year
ground lease, which will convert into a fee simple interest upon
the completion of certain property subdivisions. |
64
|
|
(5) |
Includes rent from a lease with Nuvelo, Inc., which is expected
to commence in September 2005. |
|
(6) |
We own an 88.5% limited partnership interest and a 0.5% general
partnership interest in the limited partnership that owns this
property. |
|
(7) |
A portion of one of the buildings on this property, representing
6,600 square feet, is subleased by Illumina to an
unaffiliated third party for a period of 47 years, for
which we will receive no economic benefit. |
|
(8) |
We own the general partnership interest in the limited
partnership that owns the McKellar Court property, which
entitles us to 75% of the gains upon a sale of the property and
21% of the operating cash flows. |
|
(9) |
This property is occupied by the Centre for Health Care as a
medical office facility. Centre for Health Care, which occupies
the property with the consent of the University of California
Regents, pays the monthly rent and other obligations, but the
University of California Regents remain ultimately liable under
the lease. |
|
|
(10) |
We own 70% of the limited liability company that owns the Waples
Street property, which entitles us to 90% of the cash flow from
operations up to a 9.5% cumulative annual return, and then 75%
of such distributions thereafter. The other member of the
limited liability company has the right to put its interest to
us after completion of the initial improvements, and can require
us to issue partnership units as payment for such interest. |
Description of Significant Existing Properties
Our Landmark at Eastview and King of Prussia properties are the
only properties that represented more than 10% of our total
assets or more than 10% of our gross revenues as of
December 31, 2004.
Our Landmark at Eastview property, located in Tarrytown, New
York, consists of eight buildings representing
751,648 rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space. We have a leasehold interest in the property through a
99-year ground lease with the existing property owner. The owner
retains a fee simple interest in the property. The transaction
was structured as a ground lease to allow the seller to complete
certain property subdivisions. Under the terms of the ground
lease, we retain in escrow $1.0 million, which will be
transferred to the seller upon completion of the property
subdivisions, after which time the ground lease will terminate
and a fee simple interest in the property will be transferred to
us for no additional consideration. The buildings were
constructed between 1958 and 1971 as the Union Carbide Research
and Development Campus. We acquired the property in August 2004.
We intend to make $4.0 million of capital improvements from
future borrowings or other capital sources. The property is
currently 95% leased to 18 tenants, of which 73.5% of the
rentable square footage is leased under triple-net leases. The
following table summarizes the information regarding the tenants
of Landmark at Eastview representing more than 10% of the total
rentable square footage, as of May 31, 2005, all of which
lease space pursuant to triple-net leases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Property | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased | |
|
Leased | |
|
Annualized | |
|
|
Principal Nature | |
|
Lease | |
|
Renewal | |
|
Square | |
|
Square | |
|
Base Rent | |
Name |
|
of Business | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Options | |
|
Feet | |
|
Feet | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
|
Biotech |
|
|
|
Dec. 2007 |
(1) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
211,813 |
|
|
|
29.7% |
|
|
$ |
3,950 |
|
Crompton Corporation
|
|
|
Chemical R&D |
|
|
|
Dec. 2009 |
|
|
|
2 5-yr. |
|
|
|
182,829 |
|
|
|
25.6% |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
Emisphere Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
Biotech |
|
|
|
Aug. 2007 |
|
|
|
2 5-yr. |
|
|
|
87,022 |
|
|
|
12.2% |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
(1) |
A lease representing 73,727 square feet of this space
expires in December 2009, subject to the tenants option to
renew the lease for one additional five-year period. |
65
The following table schedules the lease expirations for leases
in place at our Landmark at Eastview property as of May 31,
2005, assuming that tenants exercise no renewal options and all
early termination options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Annualized | |
|
Property | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Square Footage of | |
|
Property Leased | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
Annualized | |
Year of Lease Expiration |
|
Leases Expiring | |
|
Expiring Leases | |
|
Square Feet | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2005
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
55,296 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
2006
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
16,563 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
2007
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
225,108 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
% |
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
2008
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
2009
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
297,021 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
% |
|
|
5,915 |
|
|
|
41.9 |
% |
2010
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
110,452 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
714,224 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
14,106 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month-to-month leases totaling 21,863 square feet are
included in leases expiring in 2005. Unleased space of
37,424 square feet is not represented in the above table.
The current real estate tax rate for the property is 2.4%, and
the total annual tax for the property at this rate for the 2004
tax year was $1.3 million (at a taxable assessed value of
$60.0 million). As of May 31, 2005, our federal tax
basis for the property was $100.7 million. We compute
depreciation on the property using the straight-line method
based on an estimated useful life of 39 years, at an
annualized average depreciation rate of 2.56%.
Our King of Prussia property, located near Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, consists of five buildings representing
427,109 rentable square feet of laboratory, office and
warehouse space. The buildings were constructed in phases
between 1952 and 1982 and most recently were renovated in 2004.
We own an 89% interest in BMR-King of Prussia Road LP,
the limited partnership that owns the King of Prussia property.
Our interest includes an 88.5% limited partnership interest
and a 0.5% general partnership interest.
The limited partner in the partnership owns an 11% limited
partnership interest, which entitles it to $1.3 million,
plus a 10% cumulative preferred return, upon sale of the
property and none of the propertys operating cash flow.
After the third anniversary of our acquisition of the property,
the limited partner has a put option to sell its remaining
ownership interest to us for $1.6 million, which is
exercisable for a period of three months. We have a call option
on the limited partners remaining ownership interest for
$1.8 million beginning six months after the expiration
of the limited partners put option, which is exercisable
for a period of three months.
In addition, the primary tenant under a triple-net lease,
Centocor, Inc. (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), has
the right, which expires in April 2008, to purchase the
property at a purchase price using a formula based on the
capitalization rate and in-place rents. Our share of the
purchase price under the option would be higher than the price
we paid to acquire the 89% interest in the partnership that owns
the property.
66
We acquired the property in August 2004. BMR-King of Prussia
Road LP owns fee simple title to the property.
The property is 100% leased to two tenants, one of which is
an affiliate of The Rubenstein Company, as master lessee,
pursuant to a modified gross lease. A Rubenstein Company
affiliate has the right to lease all or portions of the space on
our behalf to Centocor, Inc., or to other tenants with our
approval, in which event the master lessee will be relieved of
the portion of its obligation to pay rent that equals the rent
payable by the new tenants during the term of the master lease.
To the extent any new lease extends beyond the term of the
master lease, that new lease must be on market terms. The
following table summarizes the information regarding the two
tenants as of May 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Property | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased | |
|
Leased | |
|
Annualized | |
|
|
Principal Nature | |
|
Lease | |
|
Renewal | |
|
Square | |
|
Square | |
|
Base Rent | |
Name |
|
of Business | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Options | |
|
Feet | |
|
Feet | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Centocor, Inc.
|
|
|
Biotech |
|
|
|
Mar. 2010 |
|
|
|
1 4-yr. |
|
|
|
331,398 |
|
|
|
77.6 |
% |
|
$ |
7,826 |
|
The Rubenstein Company
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
|
Feb. 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,711 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
The current real estate tax rate for the property is 1.9%, and
the total annual tax for the property at this rate for the 2004
tax year was $780,000 (at a taxable assessed value of
$41.6 million). As of May 31, 2005, our federal tax
basis for the property was $88.3 million. We compute
depreciation on the property using the straight-line method
based on an estimated useful life of 39 years, at an
annualized average depreciation rate of 2.56%.
Lyme Portfolio Properties
On May 31, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the Lyme
portfolio, consisting of ten buildings with an aggregate of
approximately 1.1 million rentable square feet of
laboratory and office space which is currently 96.8% leased with
an average remaining term of ten years, including the parking
structure with 447 parking spaces. The purchase price was
$523.6 million, excluding closing costs, and was funded
through borrowings under three credit facilities with KeyBank
and other lenders and the assumption of approximately $131.2 of
indebtedness.
The following table presents an overview of the Lyme portfolio
as of May 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
Rentable | |
|
Rentable | |
|
Approximate | |
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
Percent | |
|
Rent Per | |
|
|
|
|
of | |
|
Year Built/ | |
|
Square | |
|
Square | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Percent | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
Annualized | |
|
Leased | |
|
|
Property Location |
|
Buildings | |
|
Renovated | |
|
Feet | |
|
Feet | |
|
Lab Space | |
|
Leased | |
|
($ in 000s) | |
|
Rent | |
|
Square Foot | |
|
Primary Tenant |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Kendall Square D(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
349,325 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
% |
|
$ |
15,397 |
|
|
|
33.9% |
|
|
$ |
44.89 |
|
|
Genzyme Corporation |
Kendall Square A(1)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
302,919 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
14,536 |
|
|
|
32.0% |
|
|
|
49.61 |
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
Sidney Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
191,904 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,063 |
|
|
|
8.9% |
|
|
|
21.17 |
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
40 Erie Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
|
100,854 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4,098 |
|
|
|
9.0% |
|
|
|
40.63 |
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals |
Albany Street
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1922/1998 |
|
|
|
75,003 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
7.6% |
|
|
|
46.21 |
|
|
Millennium Pharmaceuticals |
Vassar Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1950/1998 |
|
|
|
52,520 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
26.13 |
|
|
Monsanto Company |
21 Erie Street
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1925/2004 |
|
|
|
48,238 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
1.7% |
|
|
|
27.46 |
|
|
Metabolix |
Lucent Drive
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
1.2% |
|
|
|
25.49 |
|
|
Trustees of Dartmouth College |
47 Erie Street Parking Structure
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
2.7% |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/ Weighted Average
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142,263 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
97 |
% |
|
$ |
45,421 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
$ |
41.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represented more than 10% of our total assets as of May 31,
2005 |
Our Kendall Square D property is located at 500 Kendall Street
in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This property was built in 2002 and
consists of one building, representing 349,325 rentable
square feet of laboratory and office space. We intend to perform
construction work at the property at a cost of up to
$1.8 million. The property is 98.2% leased to one tenant,
Genzyme Corporation, a public biotechnology
67
company with a broad product and service portfolio focused on
rare genetic disorders, renal disease, orthopaedics, organ
transplant and diagnostic and predictive testing, pursuant to a
triple-net lease. The lease expires in July 2018, subject to the
tenants option to renew the lease for two additional
ten-year periods. Annualized base rent under the lease is
$15.4 million. We own fee simple title to the property.
The current real estate tax rate for the property is 1.8%, and
the total annual tax for the property at this rate for the 2004
tax year was $2.1 million (at a taxable assessed value of
$113.8 million). As of May 31, 2005, our federal tax
basis for the property was $192.0 million. We compute
depreciation on the property using the straight-line method
based on an estimated useful life of 39 years, at an
annualized average depreciation rate of 2.56%.
The property is subject to a mortgage loan having an outstanding
balance as of May 31, 2005 of $73.2 million. The
mortgage has a fixed interest rate of 6.4% per annum, a
monthly payment of principal and interest of $501,000 and a
maturity date of December 1, 2018. We may prepay the
mortgage in full at any time upon payment of a prepayment
premium.
Our Kendall Square A property is located at 675 West Kendall
Street in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This property was built in
2002 and consists of one building, representing
302,919 rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space. The property is 96.7% leased to two tenants. Vertex
Pharmaceuticals, a public biotechnology company committed to the
discovery and development of breakthrough small molecule drugs
for serious diseases, leases 96.0% of the space pursuant to a
triple-net lease, of which 45,000 square feet is subleased
to Momenta Pharmaceuticals. The lease expires in April 2018,
subject to the tenants option to renew the lease for two
additional ten-year periods. Annualized base rent under the
lease is $14.5 million. We own fee simple title to the
property.
The current real estate tax rate for the property is 1.8%, and
the total annual tax for the property at this rate for the 2004
tax year was $1.3 million (at a taxable assessed value of
$70.9 million). Upon our acquisition of this property, our
federal tax basis for the property will be $150.3 million.
We will compute depreciation on the property using the
straight-line method based on an estimated useful life of
39 years, at an annualized average depreciation rate of
2.56%.
Our Sidney Street property is located in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. This property was built in 2000 and consists of
one building, representing 191,904 rentable square feet of
laboratory and office space. The property is 99.8% leased to
Vertex Pharmaceuticals pursuant to a triple-net lease. The lease
expires in August 2010, subject to the tenants option to
renew the lease for two additional ten-year periods. We own fee
simple title to the property.
This property and the 47 Erie Street parking structure are
subject to a mortgage loan having an outstanding balance as of
May 31, 2005 of $31.8 million. The mortgage has a
fixed interest rate of 7.2% per annum, a monthly payment of
principal and interest of $245,000 and a maturity date of
June 1, 2012. The loan may not be prepaid until May 2006,
and thereafter may be prepaid in full upon payment of a 1%
prepayment fee.
Our 40 Erie Street property is located in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. This property was built in 1996 and consists of
one building, representing 100,854 rentable square feet of
laboratory and office space. The property is fully leased to
Vertex Pharmaceuticals pursuant to a triple-net lease. The lease
term covering the original premises of 59,322 rentable
square feet expires in December 2010, subject to the
tenants option to renew the lease for one additional
five-year period. The term for the additional lease for
41,532 rentable square feet expires in March 2009, subject
to the tenants option to renew the lease for two
additional five-year periods. We own fee simple title to the
property.
68
The property is subject to a mortgage loan having an outstanding
balance as of May 31, 2005 of $20.2 million. The
mortgage has a fixed interest rate of 7.3% per annum, a
monthly payment of principal and interest of $199,000 and a
maturity date of July 1, 2008. The mortgage may be prepaid
in full at any time upon payment of a 1% prepayment fee.
Our Albany Street property is located in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. This property was built in 1922 and was most
recently renovated in 1998. The property consists of two
buildings, representing 75,003 rentable square feet of
laboratory and office space. The property is 99.8% leased to two
tenants. The propertys primary tenant is Millennium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a public biopharmaceutical company
focused on developing and commercializing breakthrough products
in the areas of cancer, cardiovascular disease and inflammatory
disease, which occupies 73,347 rentable square feet subject
to a triple-net lease. The lease expires in September 2013,
subject to Millennium Pharmaceuticals option to renew the
lease for two additional five-year periods. We own fee simple
title to the property.
Our Vassar Street property is located in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. This property was built in 1950 and was most
recently renovated in 1998. The property consists of one
building, representing 52,520 rentable square feet of
laboratory and office space. The property is fully leased to one
tenant, Monsanto Company, a public company specializing in
providing technology-based solutions and agricultural products
that improve farm productivity and food quality, pursuant to a
triple-net lease. A portion of the premises is subleased to
Modular Genetics, Inc. The lease expires in June 2010, subject
to the tenants option to renew the lease for two
additional five-year periods. We own fee simple title to the
property.
Our 21 Erie Street property is located in Cambridge,
Massachusetts. This property was built in 1925 and was most
recently renovated in 2004. The property consists of one
building, representing 48,238 rentable square feet of
laboratory and office space. The property is 58.1% leased to
Metabolix, Inc., a private company focused on using
biotechnology to produce performance plastics from renewable
resources, pursuant to a triple-net lease. The lease expires in
May 2014, subject to Metabolixs option to renew the lease
for two additional five-year periods and subject to
Metabolixs one-time right to terminate the lease during
the initial ten-year term of the lease. We own fee simple title
to the property.
|
|
|
47 Erie Street Parking Structure |
Our 47 Erie Street parking structure is a six-level, open-air
parking structure located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The
parking structure, which contains 447 parking spaces, was built
in 1998 and provides parking for the tenants at the Sidney
Street, 40 Erie Street, Albany Street and 21 Erie Street
properties. Revenue for the parking structure is derived from
separate parking leases between the entity that owns the parking
structure and the entities that own the Sidney Street, 40 Erie
Street and Albany Street properties. We own fee simple title to
the property.
This property is subject to the mortgage loan described above
under Sidney Street.
Our Lucent Drive property is located in Lebanon, New Hampshire.
The property was built in 2004 and consists of one building,
representing 21,500 rentable square feet of laboratory and
office space. The property is fully leased to one tenant,
Trustees of Dartmouth College, pursuant to a triple-net lease.
The lease expires in August 2014, subject to the tenants
option to renew the lease for one additional ten-year period.
The tenant has an option to purchase the property on or before
March 1, 2014 at the fair market value at the time the
option is exercised. We own fee simple title to the property.
69
The property is subject to a mortgage loan having an outstanding
balance as of May 31, 2005 of $6.0 million. The
mortgage has a fixed interest rate of 5.5% per annum,
subject to adjustment on each fifth anniversary of the loan, a
monthly payment of principal and interest of $42,000 and a
maturity date of January 21, 2015. We may prepay the loan
at any time without penalty.
Tenants
As of May 31, 2005, our properties were leased to 76
tenants, 91.6% of which are public companies or government
agencies, and 33.3% of which are investment grade (according to
Standard & Poors) or their subsidiaries. The
table that follows presents information regarding our 20 largest
tenants based on current annualized rent as of May 31,
2005. Current annualized rent is the monthly contractual rent as
of May 31, 2005, or if rent has not yet commenced, the
first monthly rent payment due, multiplied by twelve months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
Annualized | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased | |
|
Annualized | |
|
Rent per | |
|
Rent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
Square | |
|
Total | |
|
Lease |
Tenant |
|
Market |
|
Feet | |
|
(in thousands) | |
|
Foot | |
|
Portfolio | |
|
Expiration Date |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Boston |
|
|
583,474 |
|
|
$ |
22,696 |
|
|
$ |
38.90 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
April 2018(1) |
Genzyme Corporation
|
|
Boston |
|
|
343,000 |
|
|
|
15,397 |
|
|
|
44.89 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
June 2018 |
Centocor, Inc. (Johnson & Johnson)
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
331,398 |
|
|
|
7,826 |
|
|
|
23.62 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
March 2010 |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
New York/New Jersey |
|
|
211,813 |
|
|
|
3,950 |
|
|
|
18.65 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
December 2007(2) |
Illumina, Inc.
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
115,870 |
|
|
|
3,824 |
|
|
|
33.00 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
August 2014 |
Nektar Therapeutics
|
|
San Francisco |
|
|
79,917 |
|
|
|
3,737 |
|
|
|
46.76 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
October 2016 |
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|
|
Boston |
|
|
73,347 |
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
46.62 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
September 2013 |
Crompton Corporation
|
|
New York/New Jersey |
|
|
182,829 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
|
18.47 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
December 2009 |
Intermune, Inc.
|
|
San Francisco |
|
|
55,898 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
57.37 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
April 2011 |
Chiron Corporation
|
|
Seattle |
|
|
71,153 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
40.17 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
March 2008 |
Guilford Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Maryland |
|
|
168,817 |
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
15.55 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
December 2019 |
Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
|
|
Seattle |
|
|
63,836 |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
36.75 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
January 2008 |
University of California Regents
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
61,286 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
34.48 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
April 2007 |
ACS
|
|
New York/New Jersey |
|
|
71,399 |
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
25.08 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
December 2012 |
Emisphere Technologies, Inc.
|
|
New York/New Jersey |
|
|
87,022 |
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
|
|
20.04 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
August 2007 |
Nuvelo, Inc.(3)
|
|
San Francisco |
|
|
61,826 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
28.20 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
August 2012 |
Quidel Corporation(4)
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
72,863 |
|
|
|
1,671 |
|
|
|
22.94 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
December 2014 |
Ligand Pharmaceuticals
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
53,740 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
30.88 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
August 2015 |
Nastech Pharmaceutical
|
|
Seattle |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
31.67 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
January 2016 |
The Rubenstein Company
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
95,711 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
12.89 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
June 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/ Weighted Average(5)
|
|
|
|
|
2,836,199 |
|
|
$ |
88,833 |
|
|
$ |
31.32 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
41,532 square feet expires March 2009, 191,904 square
feet expires August 2010, 59,322 square feet expires
December 2010, and 290,714 square feet expires April 2018.
45,000 square feet of this space is subleased to Momenta
Pharmaceuticals. |
|
(2) |
138,086 square feet expires December 2007 and
73,726 square feet expires December 2009. |
|
(3) |
Rent is expected to commence on September 1, 2005. |
|
(4) |
This tenant occupies a property that is an unconsolidated
partnership, of which we own 21%. |
|
(5) |
Without regard to any early lease terminations and/or renewal
options. |
70
Lease Expirations
The following table presents a summary schedule of available
space at May 31, 2005 and lease expirations over the next
ten calendar years for leases in place at May 31, 2005.
This table assumes that none of the tenants exercise renewal
options or early termination rights, if any, at or prior to the
scheduled expirations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable | |
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
|
|
Annualized | |
|
Annualized | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square | |
|
Percent | |
|
Base | |
|
|
|
Rent per | |
|
Rent at | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Revenue per | |
|
|
Feet of | |
|
of Total | |
|
Rent (in | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Leased | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Annualized | |
|
Leased | |
|
|
Expiring | |
|
Square | |
|
thousands) | |
|
Annualized | |
|
Square | |
|
(in thousands) | |
|
Rent at | |
|
Square Foot | |
Year of Lease Expiration |
|
Leases | |
|
Feet | |
|
(1) | |
|
Base Rent | |
|
Foot | |
|
(1) | |
|
Expiration | |
|
at Expiration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Vacant
|
|
|
184,154 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Development
|
|
|
149,412 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
152,300 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
2,215 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
14.54 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
18.46 |
|
2006
|
|
|
160,799 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
2,786 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
17.33 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
17.69 |
|
2007
|
|
|
352,141 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
7,226 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
20.52 |
|
|
|
7,836 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
22.25 |
|
2008
|
|
|
246,959 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
7,240 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
29.32 |
|
|
|
7,720 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
31.26 |
|
2009
|
|
|
422,898 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
9,374 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
22.17 |
|
|
|
10,085 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
23.85 |
|
2010
|
|
|
760,319 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
17,845 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
23.47 |
|
|
|
19,310 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
25.40 |
|
2011
|
|
|
55,898 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
57.37 |
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
72.59 |
|
2012
|
|
|
221,496 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5,880 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
26.55 |
|
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
31.49 |
|
2013
|
|
|
222,299 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
4,903 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
22.05 |
|
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
31.41 |
|
2014
|
|
|
238,252 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
6,812 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
28.59 |
|
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
36.47 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,089,062 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
41,111 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
37.75 |
|
|
|
54,400 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
% |
|
|
49.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/ Weighted Average
|
|
|
4,255,989 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
108,599 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
27.69 |
|
|
$ |
131,711 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
33.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes rent for the 47 Erie Street parking structure. |
Property Improvements
The improvements generally required for our properties
infrastructure are more extensive than for other property types.
Typical improvements include reinforced concrete floors,
upgraded roof loading capacity, increased floor-to-ceiling
heights, heavy-duty HVAC systems, enhanced environmental control
technology, significantly upgraded electrical, gas and plumbing
infrastructure, and laboratory benchwork. Our tenants generally
are responsible for all capital improvements and are
contractually obligated to perform all maintenance on the
properties as well, or reimburse us for all of the expenses
relating to these functions. We provide a tenant improvement
allowance in accordance with prevailing market conditions. With
the exception of the capital improvements described above for
our Landmark at Eastview and Kendall Square D properties,
and an aggregate of $40.3 million relating to capital
improvements at our Bayshore Boulevard, Bridgeview, Elliott
Avenue, Fresh Pond Research Park, Graphics Drive, Industrial
Road, Phoenixville Pike and Waples Street properties, we have no
present plans for any material renovations, improvements or
development of our properties.
Regulation
Our properties are subject to various laws, ordinances and
regulations, including regulations relating to common areas. We
believe that we have the necessary permits and approvals to
operate each of our properties.
|
|
|
Americans with Disabilities Act |
Our properties must comply with Title III of the ADA, to
the extent that such properties are public
accommodations as defined by the ADA. The ADA may require
removal of structural barriers to access by persons with
disabilities in certain public areas of our properties where
such removal is readily
71
achievable. We believe that our properties are in substantial
compliance with the ADA and that we will not be required to make
substantial capital expenditures to address the requirements of
the ADA. The tenants are generally responsible for any
additional amounts required to conform their construction
projects to the ADA. However, noncompliance with the ADA could
result in imposition of fines or an award of damages to private
litigants. The obligation to make readily achievable
accommodations is an ongoing one, and we will continue to assess
our properties and to make alterations as appropriate in this
respect.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations, a current or previous owner, operator or tenant of
real estate may be required to investigate and remove hazardous
or toxic substances or petroleum product releases or threats of
releases at such property, and may be held liable for property
damage and for investigation, clean-up and monitoring costs
incurred in connection with the actual or threatened
contamination. Such laws typically impose clean-up
responsibility and liability without regard to fault, or whether
the owner, operator or tenant knew of or caused the presence of
the contamination. The liability under such laws may be joint
and several for the full amount of the investigation, clean-up
and monitoring costs incurred or to be incurred or actions to be
undertaken, although a party held jointly and severally liable
may obtain contributions from the other identified, solvent,
responsible parties of their fair share toward these costs.
These costs may be substantial, and can exceed the value of the
property. The presence of contamination, or the failure to
properly remediate contamination, on a property may adversely
affect the ability of the owner, operator or tenant to sell or
rent that property or to borrow using such property as
collateral, and may adversely impact our investment on that
property.
A former creosoting works, located adjacent to our Elliott
Avenue property, has been the subject of extensive investigation
and sampling by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and the State of Washington Department of Ecology, or Ecology
Department. Studies of this adjacent site have shown it to be
contaminated with hazardous substances. The previous owner of
the Elliott Avenue property engaged an environmental consulting
firm to evaluate potential impacts to the Elliott Avenue
property from the adjacent site and from a nearby former service
station. The Phase II report completed in June
2004 states that the Ecology Department entered into a
prospective purchaser consent decree with the property owner of
the adjacent site for cleanup of that site. Further, the
Phase II report states that the Elliott Avenue property has
been impacted by hazardous contamination with constituents that
may be related to the adjacent site, and that one of such
constituents slightly exceeded the cleanup levels
for the soil selected for the adjacent site. However, the
consultant concluded that the soil that slightly exceeded the
cleanup levels, and the entire Elliott Avenue property, lies
below existing concrete pavement and does not represent a risk
to human health or the environment. The Phase II report
also states that no petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants were
detected in soil or groundwater samples. Although levels of
contamination detected at the Elliott Avenue property were
mostly below the cleanup standards established for the adjacent
site, future investigatory and remedial or related regulatory
activities or restrictions may be needed. We believe that costs
in connection with such activities or restrictions will not have
a material adverse effect on the propertys value or
operations.
Federal regulations require building owners and those exercising
control over a buildings management to identify and warn,
via signs and labels, of potential hazards posed by workplace
exposure to installed asbestos-containing materials, or ACMs,
and potential ACMs in their building. The regulations also set
forth employee training, record keeping and due diligence
requirements pertaining to ACMs and potential ACMs. Significant
fines can be assessed for violating these regulations. Building
owners and those exercising control over a buildings
management may be subject to an increased risk of personal
injury lawsuits by workers and others exposed to ACMs and
potential ACMs as a result of these regulations. The regulations
may affect the value of a building containing ACMs and potential
ACMs in which we have invested. Federal, state and local laws
and regulations also govern the removal, encapsulation,
disturbance, handling and/or disposal of ACMs and potential ACMs
when such materials are in poor condition or in the event of
construction, remodeling, renovation or demolition of a
building. Such laws may impose liability for improper handling
or a release to the environment of ACMs and potential ACMs and
may
72
provide for fines to, and for third parties to seek recovery
from, owners or operators of real properties for personal injury
or improper work exposure associated with ACMs and potential
ACMs. See Risk Factors Risks Related to the
Real Estate Industry We could incur significant
costs related to government regulation and private litigation
over environmental matters involving asbestos-containing
materials, which could adversely affect our operations, the
value of our properties, and our ability to make distributions
you.
Federal, state and local laws and regulations also require
removing or upgrading certain underground storage tanks and
regulate the discharge of storm water, wastewater and any water
pollutants; the emission of air pollutants; the generation,
management and disposal of hazardous or toxic chemicals,
substances or wastes; and workplace health and safety. Life
science industry tenants, including certain of our tenants,
engage in various research and development activities involving
the controlled use of hazardous materials, chemicals, heavy
metals, biological and radioactive compounds. Although we
believe that the tenants activities involving such
materials comply in all material respects with applicable laws
and regulations, the risk of contamination or injury from these
materials cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of such
contamination or injury, we could be held liable for any damages
that result, and any such liability could exceed our resources
and our environmental remediation insurance coverage. See
Risk Factors Risks Related to the Real Estate
Industry We could incur significant costs related to
government regulation and private litigation over environmental
matters involving the presence, discharge or threat of discharge
of hazardous or toxic substances, which could adversely affect
our operations, the value of our properties, and our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders.
In addition, our leases generally provide that (1) the
tenant is responsible for all environmental liabilities relating
to the tenants operations, (2) we are indemnified for
such liabilities and (3) the tenant must comply with all
environmental laws and regulations. Such a contractual
arrangement, however, does not eliminate our statutory liability
or preclude claims against us by governmental authorities or
persons who are not parties to such an arrangement.
Noncompliance with environmental or health and safety
requirements may also result in the need to cease or alter
operations at a property, which could affect the financial
health of a tenant and its ability to make lease payments. In
addition, if there is a violation of such a requirement in
connection with a tenants operations, it is possible that
we, as the owner of the property, could be held accountable by
governmental authorities for such violation and could be
required to correct the violation and pay related fines.
Prior to closing any property acquisition, we obtain
environmental assessments in a manner we believe prudent in
order to attempt to identify potential environment concerns at
such properties. These assessments are carried out in accordance
with an appropriate level of due diligence and generally include
a physical site inspection, a review of relevant federal, state
and local environmental and health agency database records, one
or more interviews with appropriate site-related personnel,
review of the propertys chain of title and review of
historic aerial photographs and other information on past uses
of the property. We may also conduct limited subsurface
investigations and test for substances of concern where the
results of the first phase of the environmental assessments or
other information indicates possible contamination or where our
consultants recommend such procedures.
While we may purchase our properties on an as is
basis, all of our purchase contracts contain an environmental
contingency clause, which permits us to reject a property
because of any environmental hazard at such property. We receive
environmental reports on all prospective properties.
We believe that our properties comply in all material respects
with all federal and state regulations regarding hazardous or
toxic substances and other environmental matters.
Insurance
We carry comprehensive liability, fire, workers
compensation, extended coverage, terrorism and rental loss
insurance covering all of our properties under a blanket policy,
except with respect to property and fire insurance on our
McKellar Court and Science Center Drive properties, which is
carried directly by the tenants. We believe the policy
specifications and insured limits are appropriate given the
relative risk of
73
loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice. We do not
carry insurance for generally uninsurable losses such as loss
from riots or acts of God. We also carry environmental
remediation insurance for our properties. This insurance,
subject to certain exclusions and deductibles, covers the cost
to remediate environmental damage caused by future spills or the
historic presence of previously undiscovered hazardous
substances. We intend to carry similar insurance with respect to
future acquisitions as appropriate. Our properties located in
the San Diego and San Francisco areas are subject to
earthquakes. We presently carry earthquake insurance on our
Industrial Road property in San Francisco but do not carry
earthquake insurance on our other properties in
San Francisco or San Diego. The amount of earthquake
insurance coverage we do carry may not be sufficient to fully
cover losses from earthquakes. In addition, we may discontinue
earthquake, terrorism or other insurance, or may elect not to
procure such insurance, on some or all of our properties in the
future if the cost of premiums for any of these policies
exceeds, in our judgment, the value of the coverage discounted
for the risk of loss. See Risk Factors Risks
Related to the Real Estate Industry Uninsured and
underinsured losses could adversely affect our operating results
and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
However, we believe that all of our properties are adequately
insured, consistent with industry standards.
Competition
We are one of only two publicly traded entities focusing
primarily on the acquisition, management, expansion and
selective development of properties designed for life science
tenants (the other such entity being Alexandria Real Estate
Equities, Inc.). However, various entities, including other
REITs, such as health care REITs and suburban office property
REITs, pension funds, insurance companies, investment funds and
companies, partnerships, and developers invest in properties
occupied by life science tenants and therefore compete for
investment opportunities with us. Because properties designed
for life science tenants typically contain improvements that are
specific to tenants operating in the life science industry, we
believe that we will be able to maximize returns on investments
as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
our expertise in understanding the real estate needs of life
science industry tenants; |
|
|
|
our ability to identify and acquire those properties with
generic laboratory infrastructure that appeal to a wide range of
life science industry tenants; and |
|
|
|
our expertise in identifying and evaluating life science
industry tenants. |
However, many of our competitors have substantially greater
financial resources than we do and may be able to accept more
risks, including risks with respect to the creditworthiness of a
tenant or the geographic proximity of its investments. In the
future, competition from these entities may reduce the number of
suitable investment opportunities offered to us or increase the
bargaining power of property owners seeking to sell. Further, as
a result of their greater resources, those entities may have
more flexibility than we do in their ability to offer rental
concessions to attract tenants. These concessions could put
pressure on our ability to maintain or raise rents and could
adversely affect our ability to attract or retain tenants.
Additionally, our ability to compete depends upon, among other
factors, trends of the national and local economies, investment
alternatives, financial condition and operating results of
current and prospective tenants, availability and cost of
capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental
regulations, legislation and population trends.
Employees
As of May 31, 2005, we had 30 employees, none of which were
represented by a labor union. We believe that our labor
relations are generally good.
Offices
Our headquarters is located in San Diego, California, and
we have regional offices located in West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania and at our Landmark at Eastview property. Based on
the anticipated growth
74
of our company, we intend to relocate our corporate headquarters
to a larger facility in the future. We may also add additional
regional offices depending upon our future operational needs.
Legal Proceedings
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings
nor, to our knowledge, is any legal proceeding threatened
against us that would have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
75
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
Our board of directors consists of seven members, including a
majority of directors who are independent directors. Pursuant to
our charter, each of our directors is elected by our
stockholders to serve until the next annual meeting and until
his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. See
Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and
Bylaws Our Board of Directors. Subject to
rights pursuant to any employment agreements, officers serve at
the pleasure of our board of directors.
The following table sets forth information about our executive
officers and directors as of May 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
|
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold
|
|
45 |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
50 |
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Director |
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
43 |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
39 |
|
Vice President, Acquisitions |
Barbara R. Cambon
|
|
51 |
|
Director |
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D.
|
|
63 |
|
Director |
Mark J. Riedy, Ph.D.
|
|
62 |
|
Director |
Theodore D. Roth
|
|
54 |
|
Director |
M. Faye Wilson
|
|
67 |
|
Director |
The following is a biographical summary of the experience of our
directors and executive officers:
Alan D. Gold has served as our Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer since our formation in 2004.
Mr. Gold also served in the same role with Bernardo
Property Advisors, Inc. since August 1998. Mr. Gold was a
co-founder and served as President and a director of Alexandria
Real Estate Equities, Inc., a REIT specializing in acquiring and
managing laboratory properties for lease to the life science
industry, from its predecessors inception in 1994 until he
resigned as President in August 1998 and as a director at the
end of 1998. Mr. Gold served as managing partner of Gold
Stone Real Estate Finance and Investments, a partnership engaged
in the real estate and mortgage business, from 1989 to 1994. He
also served as Assistant Vice President of Commercial Real
Estate for Northland Financial Company, a full service
commercial property mortgage banker, from 1989 to 1990 and as
Real Estate Investment Officer Commercial Real
Estate for John Burnham Company, a regional full service real
estate company, from 1985 to 1989. Mr. Gold received his
Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration and his
Master of Business Administration with an emphasis in real
estate finance from San Diego State University.
Gary A. Kreitzer has served as our Executive Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary and as a director since
our formation in 2004. Mr. Kreitzer also served in the same
role with Bernardo Property Advisors since December 1998.
Mr. Kreitzer was a co-founder and served as Senior Vice
President and In-House Counsel of Alexandria Real Estate
Equities, Inc. from its predecessors inception in 1994
until December 1998. From 1990 to 1994, Mr. Kreitzer was
In-House Counsel and Vice President for Seawest Energy
Corporation, an alternative energy facilities development
company. Mr. Kreitzer also served with The Christiana
Companies, Inc., a publicly traded investment and real estate
development company, in a number of roles from 1982 to 1989,
including as In-House Counsel, Secretary and Vice President.
Mr. Kreitzer received his Juris Doctor Degree, with honors,
from the University of San Francisco and a Bachelor of Arts
Degree in Economics from the University of California,
San Diego. Mr. Kreitzer is a member of the California
State Bar and the American Bar Association.
John F. Wilson, II has served as our Chief Financial
Officer since our formation in 2004. Mr. Wilson also served
in the same role with Bernardo Property Advisors since 1998.
From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Wilson
76
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of SupraLife
International, a private company that develops and manufactures
nutritional and other health care products. From 1994 to 1996,
Mr. Wilson was an audit partner, and from 1989 to 1994 an
audit manager, at Harlan & Boettger, a public
accounting firm. Mr. Wilson served on the Qualifications
Committee of the California State Board of Accountancy from 1995
to 1997. Mr. Wilson also was employed as an accountant at
Arthur Andersen LLP from 1984 to 1989. Mr. Wilson received
his Bachelor of Arts Degree in Business Economics from the
University of California, Santa Barbara, and is a certified
public accountant. Mr. Wilson is a member of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Financial
Executives International, the National Investor Relations
Institute, the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants and the California Society of Certified Public
Accountants.
Matthew G. McDevitt has served as our Vice President,
Acquisitions since joining us in 2004. Mr. McDevitt
previously served as President of McDevitt Real Estate Services,
Inc. (MRES), which Mr. McDevitt formed in October 1997 as a
full service real estate provider focusing on the life science
industry. Before founding MRES, Mr. McDevitt spent ten
years as a commercial real estate broker in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Mr. McDevitt
received his Bachelor of Arts Degree in Business from Gettysburg
College. He is a member of the Montgomery County High Tech
Council, the Pennsylvania Biotechnology Association and the
Biotech Council of New Jersey.
Barbara R. Cambon has been a director since 2004.
Ms. Cambon has been an independent consultant since October
2002. From November 1999 to October 2002, Ms. Cambon served
as a Principal of Colony Capital, LLC, a private real estate
investment firm, where she also served as Chief Operating
Officer from April 2000 until October 2002. From 1985 to October
1999, she served as President and was a founder of Institutional
Property Consultants, Inc., a real estate consulting company.
She received her Bachelor of Science Degree in Education from
the University of Delaware and her Master of Business
Administration with an emphasis in real estate and finance from
Southern Methodist University.
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D. has been a director since
2004. Dr. Dennis is Distinguished Professor and former
Chair of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and
Professor in the Department of Pharmacology in the School of
Medicine at the University of California, San Diego, where
he has served as a faculty member since 1970. He received his
Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University and his Master of
Arts and Doctorate of Philosophy in Chemistry from Harvard
University, and served as a Research Fellow at Harvard Medical
School.
Mark J. Riedy, Ph.D. has been a director since 2004.
Dr. Riedy has been the Ernest W. Hahn Professor of Real
Estate Finance since 1993 and Executive Director of the
Burnham-Moores Center for Real Estate since 2004 at the
University of San Diego. From July 1988 to July 1992, he
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the National
Council of Community Bankers. From July 1987 to July 1988, he
served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the
J.E. Robert Companies, a real estate workout firm. From
January 1985 to July 1986, he served as President and Chief
Operating Officer and a director of the Federal National
Mortgage Association. Dr. Riedy currently serves on the
boards of directors of Neighborhood Bancorp, AmNet Mortgage,
Inc. and Pan Pacific Retail Properties, Inc. He received his
Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics from Loras College, his
Master of Business Administration from Washington University and
his Doctorate of Philosophy from the University of Michigan.
Theodore D. Roth has been a director since 2004.
Mr. Roth has been a Managing Director of Roth Capital
Partners, LLC, an investment-banking firm, since February 2003.
For more than 15 years prior to that time, Mr. Roth
was employed by Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp., most recently
serving as President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Roth
currently serves on the board of directors of Alliance
Pharmaceutical. He received his Juris Doctor Degree from
Washburn University and a Master of Laws in Corporate and
Commercial Law from the University of Missouri in Kansas City.
M. Faye Wilson has been a director since 2005.
Ms. Wilson has been a principal of Wilson Boyles and
Company, a business management and strategic planning consulting
firm, since 2003. She served on the board of directors of
Farmers Insurance Group of Companies from 1993 through 2001 and
the board
77
of directors of The Home Depot, Inc. from 1992 through 2001.
Ms. Wilson was also a senior officer of Home Depot from
1998 through 2002. From 1992 until 1998, Ms. Wilson served
in several senior management roles at Bank of America
Corporation including Chairman of Security Pacific Financial
Services and Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer
for Bank of Americas National Consumer Banking Group.
Ms. Wilson currently serves on the board of directors of
Community Bancorp, Inc., the parent company of Community
National Bank. She earned her Masters Degrees in International
Relations and Business Administration from the University of
Southern California and an Undergraduate Degree from Duke
University. She became a certified public accountant in 1961.
Board Committees
Our board of directors has three standing committees: the audit
committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and
corporate governance committee. Our board of directors has
adopted charters for each of the audit committee, compensation
committee and nominating and corporate governance committee.
Audit Committee. The audit committee has been established
in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The audit
committee helps ensure the integrity of our financial
statements, the qualifications and independence of our
independent registered public accounting firm and the
performance of our internal audit function and independent
registered public accounting firm. The audit committee appoints,
assists and meets with the independent registered public
accounting firm, oversees each annual audit and quarterly
review, establishes and maintains our internal audit controls
and prepares the report that federal securities laws require be
included in our annual proxy statement. Dr. Riedy is the
chair and Ms. Cambon and Ms. Wilson serve as members
of the audit committee. Our board of directors has determined
that Dr. Riedy is an audit committee financial
expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Compensation Committee. The compensation committee
reviews and approves the compensation and benefits of our
executive officers, administers and makes recommendations to our
board of directors regarding our compensation and stock
incentive plans, and produces an annual report on executive
compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement. Mr. Roth
is the chair and Dr. Dennis and Dr. Riedy serve as
members of the compensation committee.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The
nominating and corporate governance committee develops and
recommends to our board of directors a set of corporate
governance principles, adopts a code of ethics, adopts policies
with respect to conflicts of interest, monitors our compliance
with corporate governance requirements of state and federal law
and the rules and regulations of the NYSE, establishes criteria
for prospective members of our board of directors, conducts
candidate searches and interviews, oversees and evaluates our
board of directors and management, evaluates from time to time
the appropriate size and composition of our board of directors,
recommends, as appropriate, increases, decreases and changes in
the composition of our board of directors and recommends to our
board of directors the slate of directors to be elected at each
annual meeting of our stockholders. Ms. Cambon is the chair
and Dr. Dennis, Mr. Roth and Ms. Wilson serve as
members of the nominating and corporate governance committee.
Our board of directors may from time to time establish certain
other committees to facilitate the management of BioMed.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
There are no compensation committee interlocks and none of the
employees participate on the compensation committee.
78
Compensation of Directors
Each of our directors who is not an employee of our company or
our subsidiaries receives an annual fee of $16,000 for services
as a director. In addition, each director who is not an employee
of our company or our subsidiaries receives a fee of $1,500 for
each board of directors meeting attended in person ($750 for
telephonic attendance), a fee of $750 for each committee meeting
attended in person on a day that does not include a meeting of
our board of directors ($500 for telephonic attendance) and an
additional fee of $1,500 for each committee meeting chaired by
that director, whether or not a meeting of the board of
directors is held on the same day. Directors are also reimbursed
for reasonable expenses incurred to attend board of directors
and committee meetings. Directors who are employees of our
company or our subsidiaries do not receive compensation for
their services as directors.
Our non-employee directors also receive automatic grants of
restricted stock under our 2004 incentive award plan. Effective
on the date of initial trading of our common stock, each
non-employee director was granted 2,000 shares of
restricted common stock. Thereafter, on the date of each annual
meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director who
continues to serve on our board of directors will be granted
2,000 shares of restricted common stock. Similarly, we will
grant 2,000 shares of restricted common stock to each
non-employee director who is initially elected or appointed to
our board of directors after the IPO on the date of such initial
election or appointment. We also will grant 2,000 shares of
restricted common stock on the date of each annual meeting of
stockholders while the non-employee director continues to serve
on our board of directors. The restricted stock granted to
non-employee directors vests one year from the date of grant.
Executive Officer Compensation
Because we were only recently organized, meaningful individual
compensation information is not available for periods prior to
August 6, 2004. The following table sets forth the annual
base salary, bonus and other compensation paid in 2004 to our
Chief Executive Officer and our three other most highly
compensated executive officers, which are collectively referred
to as our named executive officers. Pursuant to their respective
employment agreements and our 2004 incentive award plan, each of
our named executive officers received shares of restricted
common stock as set forth under Restricted Stock
Awards in the table below.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Restricted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Stock | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Awards(1) | |
|
Compensation(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Alan D. Gold
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
144,798 |
|
|
$ |
70,565 |
|
|
$ |
1,900,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,733 |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
101,923 |
|
|
|
50,403 |
|
|
|
1,100,000 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
101,923 |
|
|
|
50,403 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
89,692 |
|
|
|
44,355 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
11,228 |
|
|
Vice President, Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents the value of restricted stock awarded on
August 6, 2004 based on the initial public offering price
of our common stock of $15.00 per share. Messrs. Gold,
Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt were awarded 126,667, 73,333,
66,667 and 30,000 shares of restricted stock, respectively.
Based on the closing price of our common stock of
$22.21 per share at December 31, 2004, the value of
the stock awards was $2,813,274, $1,628,726, $1,480,674 and
$666,300, respectively. The restricted stock vests
1/3 annually
on each of January 1, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and dividends
are paid on the entirety of the grant from the date of the grant. |
|
(2) |
All other compensation represents automobile allowances and, in
the case of Mr. McDevitt, $7,599 in premiums paid for life
and disability insurance. |
79
401(k) Plan
We established and maintain a retirement savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Code to cover our eligible employees,
which became effective as of January 1, 2005. The plan
allows eligible employees to defer, within prescribed limits, up
to 100% of their compensation on a pre-tax basis through
contributions to the plan. We currently match each eligible
participants contributions, within prescribed limits, with
an amount equal to 50% of such participants initial 6%
tax-deferred contributions. In addition, we reserve the right to
make additional discretionary contributions on behalf of
eligible participants. Our employees are eligible to participate
in the plan if they meet certain requirements, including a
minimum period of credited service. Any matching and
discretionary company contributions may be subject to certain
vesting requirements. Some classes of employees, such as those
covered by a collective bargaining agreement, will not be
eligible to participate in the plan.
2004 Incentive Award Plan
We have adopted the 2004 Incentive Award Plan of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P. The incentive award plan
became effective on August 3, 2004. The incentive award
plan provides for the grant to employees and consultants of our
company and our operating partnership (and their respective
subsidiaries) and directors of our company of stock options,
restricted stock, dividend equivalents, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock units and other incentive awards. Only
employees of our company and its qualifying subsidiaries are
eligible to receive incentive stock options under the incentive
award plan. We have reserved a total of 2,500,000 shares of
our common stock for issuance pursuant to the incentive award
plan, subject to certain adjustments as set forth in the plan.
As of May 31, 2005, 394,558 shares of restricted stock
had been granted and 2,105,442 shares remained available
for future grants under the incentive award plan.
Employment Agreements
We entered into employment agreements, effective as of
August 6, 2004, with Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson
and McDevitt. The employment agreements provide for
Mr. Gold to serve as our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President, Mr. Kreitzer to serve as our Executive Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary, Mr. Wilson to
serve as our Chief Financial Officer and Mr. McDevitt to
serve as our Vice President, Acquisitions. These employment
agreements require Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and
McDevitt, as applicable, to devote such attention and time to
our affairs as is necessary for the performance of their duties,
but also permit them to devote time to their outside business
interests consistent with past practice. Under the employment
agreements with Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer, we will use our
best efforts to cause Mr. Gold to be nominated and elected
as Chairman of our board of directors and Mr. Kreitzer to
be nominated and elected as a member of our board of directors.
The employment agreements with Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and
Wilson have a term of three years, and the employment agreement
with Mr. McDevitt has a two-year term. Each employment
agreement provides for automatic one-year extensions thereafter,
unless either party provides at least six months notice of
non-renewal.
The employment agreements provide for:
|
|
|
|
|
an annual base salary of $350,000 for Mr. Gold, $250,000
for Messrs. Kreitzer and Wilson and $220,000 for
Mr. McDevitt, subject to annual increases based on
increases in the consumer price index and further increases in
the discretion of our board of directors or the compensation
committee of our board of directors, |
|
|
|
eligibility for annual cash performance bonuses based on the
satisfaction of performance goals established by our board of
directors or the compensation committee of our board of
directors, |
|
|
|
participation in other incentive, savings and retirement plans
applicable generally to our senior executives, |
80
|
|
|
|
|
medical and other group welfare plan coverage and fringe
benefits provided to our senior executives, |
|
|
|
payment of the premiums for a long-term disability insurance
policy which will provide benefits equal to at least 60% of an
executives annual base salary, |
|
|
|
payment of the premiums for a $1 million term life
insurance policy, and |
|
|
|
monthly payments of $750 ($1,000 in the case of Mr. Gold)
for an automobile allowance. |
Each executive has a minimum annual bonus equal to 50% of base
salary. Mr. Golds annual bonus may be up to 200% of
his base salary. Messrs. Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt may
have annual bonuses up to 150% of their base salary.
In addition, on August 6, 2004, Messrs. Gold,
Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt were granted 126,667, 73,333,
66,667 and 30,000 shares of restricted stock, respectively.
The restricted stock vests one-third each year, beginning on
January 1, 2005 and each successive January 1 thereafter.
The employment agreements provide that, if an executives
employment is terminated by us without cause or by
the executive for good reason (each as defined in
the applicable employment agreement), or, in the case of
Mr. Gold, if we fail to renew his employment agreement for
each of the first two renewal years, the executive will be
entitled to the following severance payments and benefits,
subject to his execution and non-revocation of a general release
of claims:
|
|
|
|
|
an amount equal to the sum of the then-current annual base
salary plus average bonus over the prior three years, multiplied
by |
|
|
|
|
|
with respect to Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson,
three, or |
|
|
|
with respect to Mr. McDevitt, one |
|
|
|
(such number, the Severance Multiple for such
executive), 50% of which amount shall be paid in a lump sum and
the remaining 50% of which amount will be paid in equal monthly
installments over two years (or, with respect to
Mr. McDevitt, one year), |
|
|
|
|
|
health benefits for 18 months following the
executives termination of employment at the same level as
in effect immediately preceding such termination, subject to
reduction to the extent that the executive receives comparable
benefits from a subsequent employer, |
|
|
|
up to $15,000 worth of outplacement services at our
expense, and |
|
|
|
100% of the unvested stock options held by the executive will
become fully exercisable and 100% of the unvested restricted
stock held by such executive will become fully vested. |
Under the employment agreements, we agree to make an additional
tax gross-up payment to the executive if any amounts paid or
payable to the executive would be subject to the excise tax
imposed on certain so-called excess parachute
payments under Section 4999 of the Code. However, if
a reduction in the payments and benefits of 10% or less would
render the excise tax inapplicable, then the payments and
benefits will be reduced by such amount, and we will not be
required to make the gross-up payment.
Each employment agreement provides that, if the executives
employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive
for good reason within one year after a change in
control (as defined in the applicable employment
agreement), then the executive will receive the above benefits
and payments as though the executives employment was
terminated without cause or for good reason. However, the
severance amount shall be paid in a lump sum.
81
Each employment agreement also provides that the executive or
his estate will be entitled to certain severance benefits in the
event of his death or disability. Specifically, each executive
or, in the event of the executives death, his
beneficiaries, will receive:
|
|
|
|
|
an amount equal to the then-current annual base salary, |
|
|
|
his prorated annual bonus for the year in which the termination
occurs, |
|
|
|
health benefits for the executive and/or his eligible family
members for twelve months following the executives
termination of employment, and |
|
|
|
in the event the executives employment is terminated as a
result of his disability, we will continue to pay the premiums
on the long-term disability and life insurance policies
described above for twelve months. |
The employment agreements also contain standard confidentiality
provisions, which apply indefinitely, and non-solicitation
provisions, which apply during the term of the employment
agreements and for any period thereafter during which the
executive is receiving payments from us.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification
Maryland law permits us to include in our charter a provision
limiting the liability of our directors and officers to us and
our stockholders for money damages, except for liability
resulting from (1) actual receipt of an improper benefit or
profit in money, property or services or (2) active and
deliberate dishonesty established by a final judgment and that
is material to the cause of action. Our charter contains a
provision that eliminates directors and officers
liability to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
Maryland law requires us (unless our charter provides otherwise,
which our charter does not) to indemnify a director or officer
who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the
defense of any proceeding to which he is made a party by reason
of his service in that capacity. Maryland law permits us to
indemnify our present and former directors and officers, among
others, against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and
reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in connection with
any proceeding to which they may be made a party by reason of
their service in those or other capacities unless it is
established that:
|
|
|
|
|
the act or omission of the director or officer was material to
the matter giving rise to the proceeding and (1) was
committed in bad faith or (2) was the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty, |
|
|
|
the director or officer actually received an improper personal
benefit in money, property or services, or |
|
|
|
in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer
had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful. |
A court may order indemnification if it determines that the
director or officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to
indemnification, even though the director or officer did not
meet the prescribed standard of conduct or was adjudged liable
on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received.
However, indemnification for an adverse judgment in a suit by us
or in our right, or for a judgment of liability on the basis
that personal benefit was improperly received, is limited to
expenses.
In addition, Maryland law permits us to advance reasonable
expenses to a director or officer upon receipt of (1) a
written affirmation by the director or officer of his good faith
belief that he has met the standard of conduct necessary for
indemnification and (2) a written undertaking by him or on
his behalf to repay the amount paid or reimbursed if it is
ultimately determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law, to obligate our company to indemnify (1) any
present or former director or officer or (2) any individual
who, while a director or officer and, at our request, serves or
has served another corporation, REIT, partnership, joint
82
venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a
director, officer, partner or trustee, against any claim or
liability arising from his or her service in that capacity and
to pay or reimburse such individuals reasonable expenses
in advance of final disposition of a proceeding. Our bylaws
obligate us to provide such indemnification and advance of
expenses.
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our
directors and certain executive officers that obligate us to
indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
The indemnification agreements require us to indemnify the
director or officer, the indemnitee, against all judgments,
penalties, fines and amounts paid in settlement and all expenses
actually and reasonably incurred by the indemnitee or on his or
her behalf in connection with a proceeding other than one
initiated by or on behalf of us. In addition, the
indemnification agreements require us to indemnify the
indemnitee against all amounts paid in settlement and all
expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the indemnitee or
on his or her behalf in connection with a proceeding that is
brought by or on behalf of us. In either case, the indemnitee is
not entitled to indemnification if it is established that one of
the exceptions to indemnification under Maryland law set forth
above exists.
In addition, the indemnification agreements require us to
advance reasonable expenses incurred by the indemnitee within
ten days of the receipt by us of a statement from the indemnitee
requesting the advance, provided the statement evidences the
expenses and is accompanied by:
|
|
|
|
|
a written affirmation of the indemnitees good faith belief
that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for
indemnification, and |
|
|
|
an undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay the
amount if it is ultimately determined that the standard of
conduct was not met. |
The indemnification agreements also provide for procedures for
the determination of entitlement to indemnification, including
requiring such determination be made by independent counsel
after a change of control of us.
83
POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN ACTIVITIES
The following is a discussion of certain of our investment,
financing and other policies. These policies have been
determined by our board of directors and, in general, may be
amended or revised from time to time by our board of directors
without a vote of our stockholders.
Investment Policies
|
|
|
Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real
Estate |
We conduct all of our investment activities through our
operating partnership and its affiliates. Our investment
objectives are to provide quarterly cash distributions and
achieve long-term capital appreciation through increases in the
value of our company. We have not established a specific policy
regarding the relative priority of these investment objectives.
For a discussion of our properties and acquisition and other
strategic objectives, see Business and Properties.
We expect to pursue our investment objectives primarily through
our operating partnerships ownership of our contribution
properties and other acquired properties and real estate assets
designed principally for life science entities. We intend to
continue to invest primarily in developments of office
properties and laboratory space, acquisitions of existing
improved properties or properties in need of redevelopment and
acquisitions of land that we believe has development potential.
Although we intend to continue to focus our activities in our
target markets on office properties and laboratory space
designed principally for life science entities, future
investment or development activities will not be limited to any
geographic area, product type or to a specified percentage of
our assets. While we may diversify in terms of property
locations, size and market, we do not have any limit on the
amount or percentage of our assets that may be invested in any
one property or any one geographic area. We intend to engage in
such future investment or development activities in a manner
that is consistent with the maintenance of our status as a REIT
for federal income tax purposes. In addition, we may purchase or
lease income-producing commercial and other types of properties
for long-term investment, expand and improve the properties we
presently own or subsequently acquire, or sell such properties,
in whole or in part, when circumstances warrant.
We also may participate with third parties in property
ownership, through joint ventures or other types of
co-ownership. These types of investments may permit us to own
interests in larger assets without unduly restricting our
diversification and, therefore, provide us with flexibility in
structuring our portfolio. We will not, however, enter into a
joint venture or other partnership arrangement to make an
investment that would not otherwise meet our investment policies.
Equity investments in acquired properties may be subject to
existing mortgage financing and other indebtedness or to new
indebtedness we incur when we acquire or refinance these
investments. Debt service on such financing or indebtedness will
have a priority over any dividends with respect to our common
stock. Investments are also subject to our policy not to be
treated as an investment company under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended, or the 1940 Act.
|
|
|
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages |
While our current portfolio consists of, and our business
objectives emphasize, equity investments in office properties
and laboratory space designed principally for life science
entities, we may, at the discretion of our board of directors,
invest in mortgages and other types of real estate interests
consistent with our qualification as a REIT. Investments in real
estate mortgages run the risk that one or more borrowers may
default under certain mortgages and that the collateral securing
certain mortgages may not be sufficient to enable us to recoup
our full investment.
84
|
|
|
Securities of or Interests in Persons Primarily Engaged in
Real Estate Activities and Other Issuers |
Subject to the percentage of ownership limitations and gross
income tests necessary for REIT qualification, we may invest in
securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate
activities or other issuers, including for the purpose of
exercising control over such entities.
Dispositions
We do not currently intend to dispose of any of our properties,
although we reserve the right to do so if, based upon
managements periodic review of our portfolio, our board of
directors determines that such action would be in our
stockholders best interests. Any decision to dispose of a
property will be made by our board of directors. Directors and
executive officers holding units may be influenced as to the
desirability of a proposed disposition by the tax consequences
to them resulting from the disposition of a certain property. In
addition, under the tax indemnification provisions of the
contribution agreements, we may be obligated to indemnify
certain contributors against adverse tax consequences if we sell
or dispose of certain properties in taxable transactions.
Financing Policies
Our board of directors has adopted a policy of limiting our
indebtedness to approximately 60% of our total market
capitalization. We define our total market capitalization as the
sum of the market value of our outstanding common stock (which
may decrease, thereby increasing our debt-to-total market
capitalization ratio), plus the aggregate value of units we do
not own, plus the book value of our total consolidated
indebtedness. Since this ratio is based, in part, upon market
values of equity, it will fluctuate with changes in our common
stocks market value. However, we believe that this ratio
provides an appropriate indication of leverage for a company
whose assets are primarily real estate. Following completion of
this offering and application of the proceeds, our ratio of
debt-to-total market capitalization will be approximately 33.5%
(32.6% if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option
in full).
Our charter and bylaws do not limit the amount or percentage of
indebtedness that we may incur. Our board of directors may from
time to time modify our debt policy in light of then-current
economic conditions, relative costs of debt and equity capital,
market values of our properties, general conditions in the
market for debt and equity securities, fluctuations in the
market price of our common stock, growth and acquisition
opportunities and other factors. Accordingly, we may increase or
decrease our ratio of debt-to-total market capitalization beyond
the limits described above. If these policies were changed, we
could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increased
risk of default on our obligations and a related increase in
debt service requirements that could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations and our ability to
make distributions to our stockholders. See Risk
Factors Risks Related to Our Capital
Structure Debt obligations expose us to increased
risk of property losses and may have adverse consequences on our
business operations and our ability to make distributions
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
Conflict of Interest Policies
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that
prohibits conflicts of interest between our officers, employees
and directors on the one hand, and our company on the other
hand, except in compliance with the policy. Waivers of our code
of business conduct and ethics must be disclosed in accordance
with NYSE and Securities and Exchange Commission requirements.
In addition, our board of directors is subject to certain
provisions of Maryland law, which are also designed to eliminate
or minimize conflicts. However, we cannot assure you that these
policies or provisions of law will always succeed in eliminating
the influence of such conflicts. If they are not successful,
decisions could be made that might fail to reflect fully the
interests of all stockholders.
85
Interested Director and Officer Transactions
Pursuant to the MGCL, a contract or other transaction between us
and a director or between us and any other corporation or other
entity in which any of our directors is a director or has a
material financial interest is not void or voidable solely on
the grounds of such common directorship or interest. The common
directorship or interest, the presence of such director at the
meeting at which the contract or transaction is authorized,
approved or ratified or the counting of the directors vote
in favor thereof will not render the transaction void or
voidable if:
|
|
|
|
|
the material facts relating to the common directorship or
interest and as to the transaction are disclosed to our board of
directors or a committee of our board, and our board or a duly
authorized committee authorizes, approves or ratifies the
transaction or contract by the affirmative vote of a majority of
disinterested directors, even if the disinterested directors
constitute less than a quorum, or |
|
|
|
the material facts relating to the common directorship or
interest and as to the transaction are disclosed to our
stockholders entitled to vote thereon, and the transaction is
authorized, approved or ratified by a majority of the votes cast
by the stockholders entitled to vote, other than the votes or
shares owned of record or beneficially by the interested
director or corporation or other entity, or |
|
|
|
the transaction or contract is fair and reasonable to us at the
time it is authorized, ratified or approved. |
Furthermore, under Maryland law (where our operating partnership
is formed), we, as general partner, may have a fiduciary duty to
the limited partners of our operating partnership and,
consequently, such transactions also may be subject to the
duties of care and loyalty that we, as general partner, owe to
limited partners in our operating partnership (to the extent
such duties have not been modified pursuant to the terms of the
partnership agreement). We have adopted a policy that requires
that all contracts and transactions between us, our operating
partnership or any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any
of our directors or executive officers or any entity in which
such director or executive officer is a director or has a
material financial interest, on the other hand, must be approved
by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested
directors. Where appropriate in the judgment of the
disinterested directors, our board of directors may obtain a
fairness opinion or engage independent counsel to represent the
interests of non-affiliated security holders, although our board
of directors will have no obligation to do so.
Policies with Respect to Other Activities
We have authority to offer common stock, preferred stock or
options to purchase stock in exchange for property and to
repurchase or otherwise acquire our common stock or other
securities in the open market or otherwise, and we may engage in
such activities in the future. Except in connection with our
formation transactions, we have not issued common stock, units
or any other securities in exchange for property, and our board
of directors has no present intention of causing us to
repurchase any common stock. We may issue preferred stock from
time to time, in one or more series, as authorized by our board
of directors without the need for stockholder approval. See
Description of Securities. We have not engaged in
trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of
securities of other issuers other than our operating partnership
and do not intend to do so. At all times, we intend to make
investments in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT, unless
because of circumstances or changes in the Code or the Treasury
regulations, our board of directors determines that it is no
longer in our best interest to qualify as a REIT. We have not
made any loans to third parties, although we may in the future
make loans to third parties, including, without limitation, to
joint ventures in which we participate. We intend to make
investments in such a way that we will not be treated as an
investment company under the 1940 Act.
Generally speaking, we intend to make available to our
stockholders audited annual financial statements and annual
reports. We are subject to the information reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to these
requirements, we will file periodic reports, proxy statements
and other information, including audited financial statements,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
86
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Formation Transactions and Contribution of Properties
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. was formed as a Maryland corporation
on April 30, 2004. We also formed our operating
partnership, BioMed Realty, L.P., as a Maryland limited
partnership on April 30, 2004. In connection with our IPO
in August 2004, we acquired interests in six properties through
our operating partnership that were previously owned by limited
partnerships and a limited liability company in which
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt, entities
affiliated with them, and private investors and tenants who are
not affiliated with them owned interests. We refer to these
transactions collectively as our formation transactions.
Persons and entities owning the interests in four of the limited
partnerships and the limited liability company, including
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt, some of their
spouses and parents, and other individuals and entities not
affiliated with us or our management, contributed to us all of
their interests in these entities. In addition, the entity that
owned the general partnership interest in a limited partnership
that owns our McKellar Court property contributed to us all of
its interests in that entity. In exchange for these interests,
we issued an aggregate of 2,870,564 units and cash payments
in the aggregate amount of $20.5 million.
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt (including some
of their spouses) received an aggregate of 2,673,172 units
having a value of $40.1 million based on the IPO price of
our common stock of $15.00 per share.
The following chart reflects the value of consideration (dollars
in thousands) received by each of our executive officers and
their family members in connection with the formation
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of | |
|
Cash | |
|
Total Value of | |
Contributor |
|
Units | |
|
Payments | |
|
Consideration | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Alan D. Gold
|
|
$ |
19,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,812 |
|
Gary A. Kreitzer
|
|
|
12,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,484 |
|
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
|
6,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,376 |
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668 |
|
Holly K. McDevitt (Mr. McDevitts wife)
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
Martin L. & Delia Gold Family Trust
(Mr. Golds parents)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Julie A-M Wilson (Mr. Wilsons wife)
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
David & Georgette Kreitzer (Mr. Kreitzers
parents)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
We also assumed $70.3 million of mortgage and other debt
secured by the properties contributed by our executive officers
($56.3 million of which we repaid with the net proceeds of
our IPO), excluding $10.9 million associated with the
unconsolidated partnership that owns our McKellar Court
property. The cash payments made to Messrs. Golds and
Kreitzers parents include loan repayments of $75,000 and
$25,000, respectively.
Contribution Agreements
We received the interests in the properties contributed by our
executive officers and their affiliates under contribution
agreements with the individuals or entities that held those
interests. Each contribution is subject to all of the terms and
conditions of the applicable contribution agreement. The
contributors transferred their interests in the properties to
our operating partnership for units or cash or a combination of
units and cash. We assumed or succeeded to all of each
contributors rights, obligations and responsibilities with
respect to the properties and the property entities contributed.
The contribution agreements generally contain representations by
the contributors with respect to the ownership of their
interests and other limited matters, including environmental
conditions on the properties and compliance with environmental
laws, payment of applicable taxes, physical condition of the
properties, no current condemnation or similar proceedings that
would affect the properties and compliance with laws generally.
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt made additional
customary representations and warranties
87
regarding various matters concerning the contributed properties.
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer, Wilson and McDevitt have agreed to
indemnify our operating partnership for breach of these
representations and warranties for one year after we completed
our IPO, subject to certain thresholds, and have pledged units
to our operating partnership in order to secure their indemnity
obligations.
Under the contribution agreements we agreed that if our
operating partnership directly or indirectly sells, exchanges or
otherwise disposes of (whether by way of merger, sale of assets
or otherwise) in a taxable transaction any interest in the
properties contributed by our executive officers and their
affiliates before the tenth anniversary of the completion of our
IPO, then our operating partnership will indemnify each
contributor for all direct and indirect adverse tax
consequences. The calculation of damages will not be based on
the time value of money or the time remaining within the
indemnification period. These tax indemnities do not apply to
the disposition of a restricted property under certain
circumstances.
We have also agreed for a period of ten years following the date
of our IPO to use reasonable best efforts consistent with our
fiduciary duties to maintain at least $8.0 million of debt,
some of which must be property specific, to enable the
contributors of these properties to guarantee such debt in order
to defer any taxable gain they may incur if our operating
partnership repays existing debt.
Redemption or Exchange of the Limited Partnership Units in
our Operating Partnership
Beginning on October 1, 2005, limited partners of our
operating partnership, including Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer,
Wilson and McDevitt, will have the right to require our
operating partnership to redeem all or a part of their units for
cash, based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number
of shares of our common stock at the time of the redemption, or,
at our election, shares of our common stock in exchange for such
units, subject to certain ownership limits set forth in our
charter. As of May 31, 2005, the limited partners of our
operating partnership held units exchangeable for an aggregate
of 2,870,564 shares of our common stock, assuming the
exchange of units into shares of our common stock on a
one-for-one basis.
Other Benefits to Related Parties
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson have agreed to indemnify
the lenders of the debt on the contribution properties. These
indemnified lenders include Hawthorne Savings, F.S.B. with
respect to our Balboa Avenue property, Fremont
Investment & Loan with respect to our Bernardo Center
Drive and Industrial Road properties, Midland Loan Services,
Inc. with respect to our McKellar Court property and PNC Bank,
National Association with respect to our Science Center Drive
property. The indemnification covers certain losses incurred by
the lender as a result of breaches by the borrowers of the loan
documents, including losses resulting from environmental hazards
found on or in our contributed properties; losses relating to
fraud, intentional misrepresentation or misappropriation of
certain funds collected from tenants; losses resulting from
waste; and losses resulting from the borrowers failure to
comply with certain insurance provisions in the loan documents.
In connection with our IPO, we agreed to indemnify
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson against any payments they
may be required to make under such indemnification agreements.
However, our indemnification obligation will not be effective
with respect to losses relating to a breach of the environmental
representations and warranties made to our operating partnership
by Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson in their respective
contribution agreements. For losses relating to such breaches,
Messrs. Gold, Kreitzer and Wilson have agreed to indemnify
our operating partnership.
We have entered into a registration rights agreement with the
limited partners in our operating partnership to provide
registration rights to holders of common stock to be issued upon
redemption of their units.
88
STRUCTURE AND FORMATION OF OUR COMPANY
Our Operating Partnership
Substantially all of our assets are held by, and our operations
conducted through, our operating partnership. Our interest in
our operating partnership entitles us to share in cash
distributions from, and in the profits and losses of, our
operating partnership in proportion to our percentage ownership.
As sole general partner of our operating partnership, we
generally have the exclusive power under the partnership
agreement to manage and conduct its business, including with
respect to property sales and refinancing decisions, subject to
certain limited approval and voting rights of the limited
partners described more fully below in Description of the
Partnership Agreement of BioMed Realty, L.P. Our board of
directors manages the affairs of our company by directing the
affairs of our operating partnership.
We will sell 11,000,000 shares of our common stock in this
offering, and an additional 1,650,000 shares if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, and
we will contribute the net proceeds of this offering to our
operating partnership. In return for our capital contribution,
we will receive units and, upon completion of this offering,
will own a 93.6% partnership interest in our operating
partnership, or 93.9% if the underwriters exercise their
over-allotment option in full.
Beginning on October 1, 2005, limited partners of our
operating partnership will have the right to require our
operating partnership to redeem part or all of their units for
cash, or, at our election, shares of our common stock, based
upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of
our common stock at the time of the redemption, subject to the
ownership limits set forth in our charter. With each redemption
of units, we increase our percentage ownership interest in our
operating partnership and our share of our operating
partnerships cash distributions and profits and losses.
See Description of the Partnership Agreement of BioMed
Realty, L.P.
89
DESCRIPTION OF THE
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF BIOMED REALTY, L.P.
The material terms and provisions of the Agreement of Limited
Partnership of BioMed Realty, L.P. which we refer to as the
partnership agreement are summarized below. For more
detail, you should refer to the partnership agreement itself, a
copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part. For purposes of
this section, references to we, our,
us and our company refer to BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc.
Management of Our Operating Partnership
Our operating partnership, BioMed Realty, L.P., is a Maryland
limited partnership that was formed on April 30, 2004. Our
company is the sole general partner of our operating
partnership, and we conduct substantially all of our business in
or through it. As sole general partner of our operating
partnership, we exercise exclusive and complete responsibility
and discretion in its day-to-day management and control. We can
cause our operating partnership to enter into certain major
transactions including acquisitions, dispositions and
refinancings, subject to limited exceptions. The limited
partners of our operating partnership may not transact business
for, or participate in the management activities or decisions
of, our operating partnership, except as provided in the
partnership agreement and as required by applicable law. Some
restrictions in the partnership agreement restrict our ability
to engage in a business combination as more fully described in
Termination Transactions below.
The limited partners of our operating partnership expressly
acknowledged that we, as general partner of our operating
partnership, are acting for the benefit of our operating
partnership, the limited partners and our stockholders
collectively. Our company is under no obligation to give
priority to the separate interests of the limited partners or
our stockholders in deciding whether to cause our operating
partnership to take or decline to take any actions. If there is
a conflict between the interests of our stockholders on one hand
and the limited partners on the other, we will endeavor in good
faith to resolve the conflict in a manner not adverse to either
our stockholders or the limited partners; provided, however,
that for so long as we own a controlling interest in our
operating partnership, any conflict that cannot be resolved in a
manner not adverse to either our stockholders or the limited
partners will be resolved in favor of our stockholders. We are
not liable under the partnership agreement to our operating
partnership or to any partner for monetary damages for losses
sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived by
limited partners in connection with such decisions; so long as
we have acted in good faith.
The partnership agreement provides that substantially all of our
business activities, including all activities pertaining to the
acquisition and operation of properties, must be conducted
through our operating partnership, and that our operating
partnership must be operated in a manner that will enable our
company to satisfy the requirements for being classified as a
REIT.
Transferability of Interests
Except in connection with a transaction described in
Termination Transactions below, we, as
general partner, may not voluntarily withdraw from our operating
partnership, or transfer or assign all or any portion of our
interest in our operating partnership, without the consent of
the holders of a majority of the limited partnership interests
(including our 91.6% limited partnership interest therein, which
will be a 93.6% limited partnership interest following
completion of this offering) except for permitted transfers to
our affiliates. The limited partners agreed not to sell, assign,
encumber or otherwise dispose of their units in our operating
partnership without our consent for the twelve-month period
following the completion of our IPO, other than to us, as
general partner, to an affiliate of the transferring limited
partner, to other original limited partners, to immediate family
members of the transferring limited partner, to a trust for the
benefit of a charitable beneficiary, or to a lending institution
as collateral for a bona fide loan, subject to specified
limitations. After the twelve-month period following the
completion of our IPO, any transfer of units by the limited
partners, except to the parties specified above, will be subject
to a right of first refusal by us and must be made only to
accredited investors as defined under Rule 501
of the Securities Act.
90
Capital Contributions
We contributed to our operating partnership all of the net
proceeds of our IPO as our initial capital contribution in
exchange for a 91.5% limited partnership interest. Some of our
directors, executive officers and their affiliates contributed
properties and assets to our operating partnership and became
limited partners and, together with other limited partners,
initially owned the remaining 8.5% limited partnership interest.
Upon completion of this offering, we will own a 93.6% limited
partnership interest and other limited partners, including some
of our directors, executive officers and their affiliates, will
own the remaining 6.4% limited partnership interest.
The partnership agreement provides that we, as general partner,
may determine that our operating partnership requires additional
funds for the acquisition of additional properties or for other
purposes. Under the partnership agreement, we are obligated to
contribute the proceeds of any offering of stock as additional
capital to our operating partnership. Our operating partnership
is authorized to cause partnership interests to be issued for
less than fair market value if we conclude in good faith that
such issuance is in the interests of our operating partnership.
The partnership agreement provides that we may make additional
capital contributions, including properties, to our operating
partnership in exchange for additional partnership units. If we
contribute additional capital and receive additional partnership
interests for the capital contribution, our percentage interests
will be increased on a proportionate basis based on the amount
of the additional capital contributions and the value of our
operating partnership at the time of the contributions.
Conversely, the percentage interests of the other limited
partners will be decreased on a proportionate basis. In
addition, if we contribute additional capital and receive
additional partnership interests for the capital contribution,
the capital accounts of the partners may be adjusted upward or
downward to reflect any unrealized gain or loss attributable to
the properties as if there were an actual sale of the properties
at the fair market value thereof. Limited partners have no
preemptive right or obligation to make additional capital
contributions.
Our operating partnership could issue preferred partnership
interests in connection with acquisitions of property or
otherwise. Any such preferred partnership interests would have
priority over common partnership interests with respect to
distributions from our operating partnership, including the
partnership interests that our wholly owned subsidiaries own.
Amendments of the Partnership Agreement
Amendments to the partnership agreement may be proposed by us,
as general partner, or by limited partners owning at least 25%
of the units held by limited partners.
Generally, the partnership agreement may be amended, modified or
terminated only with the approval of partners holding 50% of all
outstanding units (including the units held by us as general
partner and as a limited partner). However, as general partner,
we will have the power to unilaterally amend the partnership
agreement without obtaining the consent of the limited partners
as may be required to:
|
|
|
|
|
add to our obligations as general partner or surrender any right
or power granted to us as general partner for the benefit of the
limited partners, |
|
|
|
reflect the issuance of additional units or the admission,
substitution, termination or withdrawal of partners in
accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, |
|
|
|
set forth or amend the designations, rights, powers, duties and
preferences of the holders of any additional partnership
interests issued by our operating partnership, |
|
|
|
reflect a change of an inconsequential nature that does not
adversely affect the limited partners in any material respect, |
|
|
|
cure any ambiguity, correct or supplement any provisions of the
partnership agreement not inconsistent with law or with other
provisions of the partnership agreement, or make other changes |
91
|
|
|
|
|
concerning matters under the partnership agreement that will not
otherwise be inconsistent with the partnership agreement or law, |
|
|
|
satisfy any requirements, conditions or guidelines of federal or
state law, |
|
|
|
reflect changes that are reasonably necessary for us, as general
partner, to maintain our status as a REIT, or |
|
|
|
modify the manner in which capital accounts are computed. |
Amendments that would convert a limited partners interest
into a general partners interest, adversely affect the
limited liability of a limited partner, alter a partners
right to receive any distributions or allocations of profits or
losses or materially alter or modify the redemption rights
described below (other than a change to reflect the seniority of
any distribution or liquidation rights of any preferred units
issued in accordance with the partnership agreement) must be
approved by each limited partner that would be adversely
affected by such amendment; provided, that any such amendment
does not require the unanimous consent of all the partners who
are adversely affected unless the amendment is to be effective
against all adversely affected partners.
In addition, without the written consent of a majority of the
units held by limited partners (other than limited partners 50%
or more of whose equity is owned, directly or indirectly, by us
as general partner), we, as general partner, may not do any of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
take any action in contravention of an express prohibition or
limitation contained in the partnership agreement, |
|
|
|
enter into or conduct any business other than in connection with
our role as general partner of our operating partnership and our
operation as a public reporting company and as a REIT, |
|
|
|
acquire an interest in real or personal property other than
through our operating partnership or our subsidiary partnerships, |
|
|
|
withdraw from our operating partnership or transfer any portion
of our general partnership interest, except to an
affiliate, or |
|
|
|
be relieved of our obligations under the partnership agreement
following any permitted transfer of our general partnership
interest. |
Redemption/Exchange Rights
Limited partners who acquired units in our formation
transactions have the right, commencing on October 1, 2005,
to require our operating partnership to redeem part or all of
their units for cash based upon the fair market value of an
equivalent number of shares of our common stock at the time of
the redemption. Alternatively, we may elect to acquire those
units in exchange for shares of our common stock. Our
acquisition will be on a one-for-one basis, subject to
adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends,
issuance of stock rights, specified extraordinary distributions
and similar events. We presently anticipate that we will elect
to issue shares of our common stock in exchange for units in
connection with each redemption request, rather than having our
operating partnership redeem the units for cash. With each
redemption or exchange, we increase our companys
percentage ownership interest in our operating partnership.
Commencing on October 1, 2005, limited partners who hold
units may exercise this redemption right from time to time, in
whole or in part, except when, as a consequence of shares of our
common stock being issued, any persons actual or
constructive stock ownership would exceed our companys
ownership limits, or violate any other restriction as provided
in our charter as described under the section entitled
Description of Securities Restrictions on
Ownership and Transfer. In all cases, unless we agree
otherwise, no limited partner may exercise its redemption right
for fewer than 1,000 units or, if a limited partner holds
fewer than 1,000 units, all of the units held by such
limited partner.
92
Issuance of Additional Units, Common Stock or Convertible
Securities
As sole general partner, we have the ability to cause our
operating partnership to issue additional units representing
general and limited partnership interests. These additional
units may include preferred limited partnership units. In
addition, we may issue additional shares of our common stock or
convertible securities, but only if we cause our operating
partnership to issue to us partnership interests or rights,
options, warrants or convertible or exchangeable securities of
our operating partnership having designations, preferences and
other rights, so that the economic interests of our operating
partnerships interests issued are substantially similar to
the securities that we have issued.
Tax Matters
We are the tax matters partner of our operating partnership. We
have authority to make tax elections under the Code on behalf of
our operating partnership.
Allocations of Net Income and Net Losses to Partners
The net income or net loss of our operating partnership
generally will be allocated to us, as the general partner, and
to the limited partners in accordance with our respective
percentage interests in our operating partnership. However, in
some cases losses may be disproportionately allocated to
partners who have guaranteed debt of our operating partnership.
The allocations described above are subject to special
allocations relating to depreciation deductions and to
compliance with the provisions of Sections 704(b) and
704(c) of the Code and the associated Treasury regulations. See
Federal Income Tax Considerations Tax Aspects
of Our Operating Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and
the Limited Liability Companies.
Operations and Distributions
The partnership agreement provides that we, as general partner,
will determine and distribute the net operating cash revenues of
our operating partnership, as well as the net sales and
refinancing proceeds, in such amount as determined by us in our
sole discretion, quarterly, pro rata in accordance with the
partners percentage interests.
The partnership agreement provides that our operating
partnership will assume and pay when due, or reimburse us for
payment of all costs and expenses relating to the operations of,
or for the benefit of, our operating partnership.
Termination Transactions
The partnership agreement provides that our company may not
engage in any merger, consolidation or other combination with or
into another person, sale of all or substantially all of our
assets or any reclassification or any recapitalization or change
in outstanding shares of our equity interests, each a
termination transaction, unless in connection with a termination
transaction either:
|
|
|
(a) all limited partners will receive, or have the right to
elect to receive, for each unit an amount of cash, securities,
or other property equal to the product of: |
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of our common stock into which each unit is
then exchangeable, and |
|
|
|
the greatest amount of cash, securities or other property paid
to the holder of one share of our common stock in consideration
of one share of our common stock in the termination transaction, |
|
|
|
provided that, if, in connection with a termination transaction,
a purchase, tender or exchange offer is made to and accepted by
the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of our
common stock, each holder of units will receive, or will have
the right to elect to receive, the greatest amount of cash,
securities, or other property which such holder would have
received had it exercised its redemption right and received
shares of our common stock in exchange for its units immediately
prior |
93
|
|
|
to the expiration of such purchase, tender or exchange offer and
accepted such purchase, tender or exchange offer; or |
|
|
|
(b) the following conditions are met: |
|
|
|
|
|
substantially all of the assets of the surviving entity are held
directly or indirectly by our operating partnership or another
limited partnership or limited liability company that is the
surviving partnership of a merger, consolidation or combination
of assets with our operating partnership, |
|
|
|
the holders of units own a percentage interest of the surviving
partnership based on the relative fair market value of the net
assets of our operating partnership and the other net assets of
the surviving partnership immediately prior to the consummation
of the transaction, |
|
|
|
the rights, preferences and privileges of such unit holders in
the surviving partnership are at least as favorable as those in
effect immediately prior to the consummation of the transaction
and as those applicable to any other limited partners or
non-managing members of the surviving partnership, and |
|
|
|
the limited partners may redeem their interests in the surviving
partnership for either the consideration available to the common
limited partners pursuant to the first paragraph in this
section, or if the ultimate controlling person of the surviving
partnership has publicly traded common equity securities, shares
of those common equity securities, at an exchange ratio based on
the relative fair market value of those securities and our
common stock. |
Term
Our operating partnership will continue in full force and effect
until December 31, 2104, or until sooner dissolved in
accordance with its terms or as otherwise provided by law.
Indemnification and Limitation of Liability
To the extent permitted by applicable law, the partnership
agreement requires our operating partnership to indemnify us, as
general partner, and our officers, directors, employees, agents
and any other persons we may designate from and against any and
all claims arising from operations of our operating partnership
in which any indemnitee may be involved, or is threatened to be
involved, as a party or otherwise, unless it is established that:
|
|
|
|
|
the act or omission of the indemnitee was material to the matter
giving rise to the proceeding and either was committed in bad
faith, fraud or was the result of active and deliberate
dishonesty, |
|
|
|
the indemnitee actually received an improper personal benefit in
money, property or services, or |
|
|
|
in the case of any criminal proceeding, the indemnitee had
reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful. |
Similarly, we, as general partner of our operating partnership,
and our officers, directors, agents or employees, are not liable
or accountable to our operating partnership for losses
sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived as a
result of errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or any
act or omission so long as we acted in good faith.
94
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of
shares of our common stock and shares of common stock into which
units are exchangeable as of May 31, 2005 for (1) each
person who is the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the
outstanding common stock, (2) directors and executive
officers and (3) directors and executive officers as a
group. Each person named in the table has sole voting and
investment power with respect to all of the shares of our common
stock shown as beneficially owned by such person, except as
otherwise set forth in the notes to the table. The extent to
which a person holds shares of common stock as opposed to units
is set forth in the footnotes below. Unless otherwise indicated,
the address of each named person is c/o BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc., 17140 Bernardo Center Drive, Suite 222,
San Diego, California 92128.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of | |
|
Shares of | |
|
|
Number of Shares of | |
|
Shares of | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Common Stock and | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
and Units | |
|
|
Units Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
|
Beneficially | |
Name and Address |
|
Owned(1) | |
|
Owned(2) | |
|
Owned(2)(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Alan D. Gold(4)
|
|
|
1,457,647 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Gary A. Kreitzer(5)
|
|
|
911,576 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
John F. Wilson, II(6)
|
|
|
504,994 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Matthew G. McDevitt(7)
|
|
|
125,200 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark J. Riedy, Ph.D.(8)
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Barbara R. Cambon(8)
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Edward A. Dennis, Ph.D(8)
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Theodore D. Roth(8)
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
M. Faye Wilson(8)
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Deutsche Bank AG(9)
|
|
|
3,051,450 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
|
K. G. Redding & Associates, LLC(10)
|
|
|
1,949,700 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
RS Investment Management Co. LLC(11)
|
|
|
1,905,200 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (9 persons)
|
|
|
3,025,917 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Amounts assume that all units are exchanged for shares of our
common stock (regardless of when such units are exchangeable). |
|
(2) |
Based on a total of 31,444,558 shares of our common stock
outstanding as of May 31, 2005. |
|
(3) |
Based on a total of 2,870,564 units outstanding as of
May 31, 2005, which may be exchanged for cash or shares of
our common stock under certain circumstances. The total number
of shares of common stock and units outstanding used in
calculating these percentages assumes that none of the units
held by other persons are exchanged for shares of our common
stock. |
|
(4) |
Includes 1,141,742 units and 136,667 shares of
restricted common stock held by Mr. Gold directly. Also
includes Mr. Golds interest in 179,038 units
held by entities in which Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer share
voting and investment power. Mr. Gold and entities
controlled by him have pledged all of the units beneficially
owned by them to our operating partnership in order to secure
their indemnity obligations under their contribution agreement. |
|
(5) |
Includes 722,528 units and 79,333 shares of restricted
common stock held by Mr. Kreitzer directly. Also includes
Mr. Kreitzers interest in 109,715 units held by
entities in which Messrs. Gold and Kreitzer share voting
and investment power. Mr. Kreitzer and entities controlled
by him have pledged all of the units beneficially owned by them
to our operating partnership in order to secure their indemnity
obligations under their contribution agreement. |
|
(6) |
Includes 425,073 units and 72,667 shares of restricted
common stock held by Mr. Wilson directly. Also includes
6,876 units and 378 shares of common stock held by
Mr. Wilsons wife. Mr. Wilson has pledged all of
the units beneficially owned by him to our operating partnership
in order to secure his indemnity obligations under his
contribution agreement. |
|
(7) |
Includes 44,541 units and 36,000 shares of restricted
common stock held by Mr. McDevitt directly. Also includes
43,659 units held by Mr. McDevitts wife.
Mr. McDevitt and his wife have pledged all of the units
beneficially owned by them to our operating partnership in order
to secure their indemnity obligations under their contribution
agreements. |
|
(8) |
Includes 4,000 shares of restricted common stock. |
95
|
|
(9) |
Deutsche Bank AGs address is Taunusanlage 12,
D-60325, Frankfurt am Main, Federal Republic of Germany. The
foregoing information is based on Deutsche Bank AGs
Schedule 13G/ A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 26, 2005. |
|
|
(10) |
K. G. Redding & Associates, LLCs address is One
North Wacker Drive, Suite 4343, Chicago, Illinois
60606-2841. The foregoing information is based on K. G.
Redding & Associates, LLCs Schedule 13G
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 14, 2005. |
|
(11) |
Information is based on RS Investment Management Co. LLCs
Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 14, 2005, which did not include RS
Investment Management Co. LLCs address. |
96
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
The following summary of the terms of the stock of our
company is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference
to our charter and bylaws, copies of which are exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
General
Our charter provides that we may issue up to
100,000,000 shares of our common stock, $0.01 par
value per share, or common stock, and 15,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, or preferred
stock. Our charter authorizes our board of directors to amend
our charter to increase or decrease the number of authorized
shares of any class or series without stockholder approval. Upon
completion of this offering, 42,444,558 shares of our
common stock (44,094,558 shares if the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full) and no shares of
preferred stock will be issued and outstanding. Under Maryland
law, stockholders generally are not liable for the
corporations debts or obligations.
Common Stock
All shares of our common stock offered hereby will be duly
authorized, fully paid and nonassessable. Subject to the
preferential rights of any other class or series of stock and to
the provisions of the charter regarding the restrictions on
transfer of stock, holders of shares of our common stock are
entitled to receive dividends on such stock if, as and when
authorized by our board of directors out of assets legally
available therefor and declared by us and to share ratably in
the assets of our company legally available for distribution to
our stockholders in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or
winding up after payment of or adequate provision for all known
debts and liabilities of our company.
Subject to the provisions of our charter regarding the
restrictions on transfer of stock, each outstanding share of our
common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of
directors and, except as provided with respect to any other
class or series of stock, the holders of such shares will
possess the exclusive voting power. There is no cumulative
voting in the election of our directors, which means that the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common
stock can elect all of the directors then standing for election
and the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to
elect any directors.
Holders of shares of our common stock have no preference,
conversion, exchange, sinking fund, redemption or appraisal
rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any
securities of our company. Subject to the provisions of the
charter regarding the restrictions on transfer of stock, shares
of our common stock will have equal dividend, liquidation and
other rights.
Under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation generally cannot
dissolve, amend its charter, merge, sell all or substantially
all of its assets, engage in a share exchange or engage in
similar transactions outside the ordinary course of business
unless such action is advised by the board of directors and
approved by the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at
least two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote on the matter
unless a lesser percentage (but not less than a majority of all
of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter) is set forth in
the corporations charter. Our charter provides, except
with respect to an amendment to the section relating to the
removal of directors and the corresponding reference in the
general amendment provision, that the foregoing items may be
approved by a majority of the votes entitled to be cast.
However, Maryland law permits a corporation to transfer all or
substantially all of its assets without the approval of the
stockholders of the corporation to one or more persons if all of
the equity interests of the person or persons are owned,
directly or indirectly, by the corporation. Because operating
assets may be held by a corporations subsidiaries, as in
our situation, this may mean that our subsidiary can merge or
transfer all of its assets without a vote of our stockholders.
97
Power to Reclassify Shares of Our Stock
Our charter authorizes our board of directors to classify and
reclassify any unissued shares of our common stock and preferred
stock into other classes or series of stock. Prior to issuance
of shares of each series, our board of directors is required by
the MGCL and our charter to set, subject to the provisions of
our charter regarding the restrictions on transfer of stock, the
terms, preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers,
restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of
redemption for each such series. Thus, our board of directors
could authorize the issuance of shares of preferred stock with
terms and conditions which could have the effect of delaying,
deferring or preventing a transaction or a change of control of
our company that might involve a premium price for our common
stockholders or otherwise be in their best interest. As of the
date hereof, no shares of preferred stock are outstanding and we
have no present plans to issue any preferred stock.
Power to Increase Authorized Stock and Issue Additional
Shares of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock
We believe that the power of our board of directors to increase
the number of authorized shares of stock, issue additional
authorized but unissued shares of our common stock or preferred
stock and to classify or reclassify unissued shares of our
common stock or preferred stock and thereafter to cause us to
issue such classified or reclassified shares of stock will
provide us with increased flexibility in structuring possible
future financings and acquisitions and in meeting other needs
which might arise. The additional classes or series, as well as
the common stock, will be available for issuance without further
action by our stockholders, unless stockholder consent is
required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or
automated quotation system on which our securities may be listed
or traded. Although our board of directors does not intend to do
so, it could authorize us to issue a class or series that could,
depending upon the terms of the particular class or series,
delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control of
our company that might involve a premium price for our
stockholders or otherwise be in their best interest.
Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer
In order for us to qualify as a REIT under the Code, our stock
must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at
least 335 days of a taxable year of twelve months (other
than the first year for which an election to be a REIT has been
made) or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year.
Also, not more than 50% of the value of the outstanding shares
of stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer
individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities)
during the last half of a taxable year (other than the first
year for which an election to be a REIT has been made).
Our charter contains restrictions on the number of shares of our
stock that a person may own. No person may acquire or hold,
directly or indirectly, in excess of 9.8% in value of our
outstanding shares of capital stock. In addition, no person may
acquire or hold, directly or indirectly, common stock in excess
of 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more
restrictive) of our outstanding shares of common stock.
Our charter further prohibits (1) any person from owning
shares of our stock that would result in our being closely
held under Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise
cause us to fail to qualify as a REIT and (2) any person
from transferring shares of our stock if the transfer would
result in our stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons. Any
person who acquires or intends to acquire shares of our stock
that may violate any of these restrictions, or who is the
intended transferee of shares of our stock which are transferred
to a trust, as described below, is required to give us immediate
notice and provide us with such information as we may request in
order to determine the effect of the transfer on our status as a
REIT. The above restrictions will not apply if our board of
directors determines that it is no longer in our best interests
to continue to qualify as a REIT.
98
Our board of directors may, in its sole discretion, waive the
ownership limit with respect to a particular stockholder if it:
|
|
|
|
|
determines that such ownership will not cause any
individuals beneficial ownership of shares of our common
stock to violate the ownership limit and that any exemption from
the ownership limit will not jeopardize our status as a
REIT, and |
|
|
|
determines that such stockholder does not and will not own,
actually or constructively, an interest in a tenant of ours (or
a tenant of any entity owned in whole or in part by us) that
would cause us to own, actually or constructively, more than a
9.9% interest (as set forth in Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the
Code) in such tenant or that any such ownership would not cause
us to fail to qualify as a REIT under the Code. |
As a condition of our waiver, our board of directors may require
an opinion of counsel or IRS ruling satisfactory to our board of
directors, and/or representations or undertakings from the
applicant with respect to preserving our REIT status.
Any attempted transfer of our stock which, if effective, would
result in our stock being owned by fewer than 100 persons will
be null and void. Any attempted transfer of our stock which, if
effective, would result in violation of the ownership limits
discussed above or in our being closely held under
Section 856(h) of the Code or otherwise failing to qualify
as a REIT, will cause the number of shares causing the violation
(rounded up to the nearest whole share) to be automatically
transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more
charitable beneficiaries, and the proposed transferee will not
acquire any rights in the shares. The automatic transfer will be
deemed to be effective as of the close of business on the
business day prior to the date of the transfer. Shares of our
stock held in the trust will be issued and outstanding shares.
The proposed transferee will not benefit economically from
ownership of any shares of stock held in the trust, will have no
rights to dividends, to vote the shares, or to any other rights
attributable to the shares of stock held in the trust. The
trustee of the trust will have all voting rights and rights to
dividends or other distributions with respect to shares held in
the trust. These rights will be exercised for the exclusive
benefit of a charitable beneficiary. Any dividend or other
distribution paid prior to our discovery that shares of stock
have been transferred to the trust must be paid by the recipient
to the trustee upon demand. Any dividend or other distribution
authorized but unpaid will be paid when due to the trustee. Any
dividend or distribution paid to the trustee will be held in
trust for the charitable beneficiary. Subject to Maryland law,
the trustee will have the authority (1) to rescind as void
any vote cast by the proposed transferee prior to our discovery
that the shares have been transferred to the trust and
(2) to recast the vote in accordance with the desires of
the trustee acting for the benefit of the charitable
beneficiary. However, if we have already taken irreversible
corporate action, then the trustee will not have the authority
to rescind and recast the vote.
Within 20 days of receiving notice from us that shares of
our stock have been transferred to the trust, the trustee will
sell the shares to a person designated by the trustee, whose
ownership of the shares will not violate the above ownership
limitations. Upon the sale, the interest of the charitable
beneficiary in the shares sold will terminate and the trustee
will distribute the net proceeds of the sale to the proposed
transferee and to the charitable beneficiary as follows. The
proposed transferee will receive the lesser of (1) the
price paid by the proposed transferee for the shares or, if the
proposed transferee did not give value for the shares in
connection with the event causing the shares to be held in the
trust (e.g., a gift, devise or other similar
transaction), the market price of the shares on the day of the
event causing the shares to be held in the trust and
(2) the price received by the trustee from the sale or
other disposition of the shares. Any net sale proceeds in excess
of the amount payable to the proposed transferee will be paid
immediately to the charitable beneficiary. If, prior to our
discovery that shares of our stock have been transferred to the
trust, the shares are sold by the proposed transferee, then
(1) the shares will be deemed to have been sold on behalf
of the trust and (2) to the extent that the proposed
transferee received an amount for the shares that exceeds the
amount he was entitled to receive, the excess must be paid to
the trustee upon demand.
99
In addition, shares of our stock held in the trust will be
deemed to have been offered for sale to us, or our designee, at
a price per share equal to the lesser of (1) the price per
share in the transaction that resulted in the transfer to the
trust (or, in the case of a devise or gift, the market price at
the time of the devise or gift) and (2) the market price on
the date we, or our designee, accept the offer. We will have the
right to accept the offer until the trustee has sold the shares.
Upon a sale to us, the interest of the charitable beneficiary in
the shares sold will terminate and the trustee will distribute
the net proceeds of the sale to the proposed transferee.
All certificates representing shares of our stock will bear a
legend referring to the restrictions described above.
Every owner of more than 5% (or such lower percentage as
required by the Code or the regulations promulgated thereunder)
of our stock, within 30 days after the end of each taxable
year, is required to give us written notice, stating his name
and address, the number of shares of each class and series of
our stock which he beneficially owns and a description of the
manner in which the shares are held. Each such owner will
provide us with such additional information as we may request in
order to determine the effect, if any, of his beneficial
ownership on our status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with
the ownership limits. In addition, each stockholder will upon
demand be required to provide us with such information as we may
request in good faith in order to determine our status as a REIT
and to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or
governmental authority or to determine such compliance.
These ownership limits could delay, defer or prevent a
transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium
price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interest
of our stockholders.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is The
Bank of New York.
100
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF MARYLAND LAW AND OF OUR CHARTER AND
BYLAWS
The following summary of certain provisions of Maryland law
and of our charter and bylaws is subject to and qualified in its
entirety by reference to Maryland law and our charter and
bylaws, copies of which are exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part. See Where
You Can Find More Information.
Our Board of Directors
Our bylaws provide that our board of directors may establish the
number of directors of our company as long as the number is not
fewer than the minimum required under the MGCL nor more than 15.
Any vacancy will be filled, at any regular meeting or at any
special meeting called for that purpose, by a majority of the
remaining directors.
Pursuant to our charter, each of our directors is elected by our
stockholders to serve until the next annual meeting and until
his or her successor is duly elected and qualified. Holders of
shares of our common stock will have no right to cumulative
voting in the election of directors. Consequently, at each
annual meeting of stockholders, the holders of a majority of the
shares of our common stock will be able to elect all of our
directors.
Removal of Directors
Our charter provides that a director may be removed only by the
affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to
be cast generally in the election of directors. This provision,
when coupled with the provision in our bylaws authorizing our
board of directors to fill vacant directorships, precludes
stockholders from removing incumbent directors and filling the
vacancies created by such removal with their own nominees.
Business Combinations
Maryland law prohibits business combinations between
us and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an
interested stockholder for five years after the most recent date
on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder. These business combinations include a merger,
consolidation, share exchange or, in certain circumstances
specified in the statute, an asset transfer, issuance or
transfer by us of equity securities, liquidation plan or
reclassification of equity securities. Maryland law defines an
interested stockholder as:
|
|
|
|
|
any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power
of our stock; or |
|
|
|
an affiliate or associate of ours who, at any time within the
two-year period prior to the date in question, was the
beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our
then-outstanding voting stock. |
A person is not an interested stockholder if our board of
directors approved in advance the transaction by which the
person otherwise would have become an interested stockholder.
However, in approving a transaction, our board of directors may
provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after
the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined
by our board of directors.
After the five-year prohibition, any business combination
between us and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an
interested stockholder generally must be recommended by our
board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at
least:
|
|
|
|
|
80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our
then-outstanding shares of voting stock; and |
|
|
|
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our
voting stock other than stock held by the interested stockholder
with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to
be effected or stock held by an affiliate or associate of the
interested stockholder. |
101
These super-majority vote requirements do not apply if our
common stockholders receive a minimum price, as defined under
Maryland law, for their stock in the form of cash or other
consideration in the same form as previously paid by the
interested stockholder for its stock.
The statute permits various exemptions from its provisions,
including business combinations that are approved or exempted by
the board of directors before the time that the interested
stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. We have opted out
of the business combination provisions of the MGCL by resolution
of our board of directors with respect to any business
combination between us and any person, provided such business
combination is first approved by our board of directors
(including a majority of the directors who are not affiliates or
associates of such person). However, our board of directors may,
by resolution, opt into the business combination statute in the
future.
We can provide no assurance that our board of directors will not
rescind this resolution, thus opting back into the provisions of
this law. Should our board opt into the business combination
statute, the business combination statute may discourage others
from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty
of consummating any offer.
Control Share Acquisitions
The MGCL provides that control shares of a Maryland
corporation acquired in a control share acquisition
have no voting rights except to the extent approved at a special
meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of
the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. Shares owned by the
acquiring person, or by officers or by directors who are our
employees, are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the
matter. Control shares are voting shares of stock
which, if aggregated with all other such shares of stock
previously acquired by the acquiror or in respect of which the
acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting
power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would
entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing
directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
|
|
|
|
|
one-tenth or more but less than one-third, |
|
|
|
one-third or more but less than a majority, or |
|
|
|
a majority or more of all voting power. |
Control shares do not include shares the acquiring person is
then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained
stockholder approval. A control share acquisition
means the acquisition of control shares, subject to certain
exceptions.
A person who has made or proposes to make a control share
acquisition, upon satisfaction of certain conditions (including
an undertaking to pay expenses), may compel our board of
directors to call a special meeting of stockholders to be held
within 50 days of demand to consider the voting rights of
the shares. If no request for a meeting is made, the corporation
may itself present the question at any stockholders meeting.
If voting rights are not approved at the meeting or if the
acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person statement
as required by the statute, then, subject to certain conditions
and limitations, the corporation may redeem any or all of the
control shares (except those for which voting rights have
previously been approved) for fair value determined, without
regard to the absence of voting rights for the control shares,
as of the date of the last control share acquisition by the
acquiror or of any meeting of stockholders at which the voting
rights of such shares are considered and not approved. If voting
rights for control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting
and the acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the
shares entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise
appraisal rights. The fair value of the shares as determined for
purposes of such appraisal rights may not be less than the
highest price per share paid by the acquiror in the control
share acquisition.
The control share acquisition statute does not apply (1) to
shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or share exchange if
the corporation is a party to the transaction or (2) to
acquisitions approved or exempted by the charter or bylaws of
the corporation.
102
Our bylaws contain a provision exempting from the control share
acquisition statute any and all acquisitions by any person of
our common stock. We can provide no assurance that our board of
directors will not amend or eliminate such provision in the
future. Should this happen, the control share acquisition
statute may discourage others from trying to acquire control of
us and increase the difficulty of consummating any offer.
Other Anti-Takeover Provisions of Maryland Law
Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL permits a Maryland
corporation with a class of equity securities registered under
the Exchange Act and with at least three independent directors
to elect to be subject to any or all of five provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
A classified board; |
|
|
|
A two-thirds vote requirement to remove a director; |
|
|
|
A requirement that the number of directors be fixed only by the
vote of the directors; |
|
|
|
A requirement that a vacancy on the board be filled only by the
remaining directors and for the remainder of the full term of
the directorship in which the vacancy occurred; and |
|
|
|
A majority requirement for the calling of a special meeting of
stockholders. |
A company can elect into this statute by provision in its
charter or bylaws or by a resolution of its board of directors.
Furthermore, a company can elect to be subject to the above
provisions regardless of any contrary provisions in the charter
or bylaws.
Through provisions in our charter and bylaws unrelated to
Subtitle 8, (1) vacancies on the board may be filled
by the remaining directors, (2) the number of directors may
be fixed only by the vote of the directors and (3) a
two-thirds vote is required to remove any director from the
board.
Amendment to Our Charter and Bylaws
Our charter may generally be amended only if declared advisable
by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least a majority of all the votes entitled
to be cast on the matter under consideration. However, the
provision regarding director removal and the corresponding
amendment provision may be amended only if advised by the board
of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of the holders
of not less than two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter. Our bylaws provide that only our board of
directors may amend or repeal our bylaws or adopt new laws.
Advance Notice of Director Nominations and New Business
Our bylaws provide that with respect to an annual meeting of
stockholders, nominations of persons for election to our board
of directors and the proposal of business to be considered by
stockholders may be made only:
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to our notice of the meeting, |
|
|
|
by or at the direction of our board of directors, or |
|
|
|
by a stockholder who is a stockholder of record both at the time
of giving the stockholders notice required by our bylaws
and at the time of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the
meeting and who has complied with the advance notice procedures
set forth in our bylaws. |
103
With respect to special meetings of stockholders, only the
business specified in our companys notice of meeting may
be brought before the meeting of stockholders and nominations of
persons for election to our board of directors may be made only:
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to our notice of the meeting, |
|
|
|
by or at the direction of our board of directors, or |
|
|
|
provided that our board of directors has determined that
directors will be elected at such meeting, by a stockholder who
is a stockholder of record both at the time of giving the
stockholders notice required by our bylaws and at the time
of the meeting, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and has
complied with the advance notice provisions set forth in our
bylaws. |
Generally, under our bylaws, a stockholder seeking to nominate a
director or bring other business before our annual meeting of
stockholders must deliver a notice to our secretary not later
than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the
close of business on the 120th day prior to the first
anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice to stockholders
for the prior years annual meeting. For a stockholder
seeking to nominate a candidate for our board of directors, the
notice must describe various matters regarding the nominee,
including name, address, occupation and number of shares held,
and other specified matters. For a stockholder seeking to
propose other business, the notice must include a description of
the proposed business, the reasons for the proposal and other
specified matters.
Anti-Takeover Effect of Certain Provisions of Maryland Law
and of Our Charter and Bylaws
The provisions of our charter on removal of directors and the
advance notice provisions of the bylaws could delay, defer or
prevent a transaction or a change of control of our company that
might involve a premium price for our common stockholders or
otherwise be in their best interest. Likewise, if our
companys board of directors were to opt in to the business
combination provisions of the MGCL or if the provision in the
bylaws opting out of the control share acquisition provisions of
the MGCL were rescinded, these provisions of the MGCL could have
similar anti-takeover effects.
Ownership Limit
Our charter provides that no person or entity may beneficially
own, or be deemed to own by virtue of the applicable
constructive ownership provisions of the Code, more than 9.8%
(by value or by number of shares, whichever is more restrictive)
of the outstanding shares of our common stock. We refer to this
restriction as the ownership limit. For a fuller
description of this restriction and the constructive ownership
rules, see Description of Securities
Restrictions on Ownership and Transfer.
104
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of material federal income tax
considerations related to our REIT election and this offering of
our common stock. This summary is for general information only
and is not tax advice.
The information in this section is based on current law,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the Code, |
|
|
|
current, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations promulgated
under the Code, |
|
|
|
the legislative history of the Code, |
|
|
|
current administrative interpretations and practices of the
IRS, and |
|
|
|
court decisions, |
in each case, as of the date of this prospectus. In addition,
the administrative interpretations and practices of the IRS
include its practices and policies as expressed in private
letter rulings that are not binding on the IRS except with
respect to the particular taxpayers who requested and received
those rulings. Future legislation, Treasury regulations,
administrative interpretations and practices and/or court
decisions may adversely affect the tax considerations described
in this discussion. Any such change could apply retroactively to
transactions preceding the date of the change.
We have not requested and do not intend to request a ruling from
the IRS that we qualify as a REIT, and the statements in this
prospectus are not binding on the IRS or any court. Thus, we can
provide no assurance that the tax considerations contained in
this summary will not be challenged by the IRS or will be
sustained by a court if so challenged. This summary does not
discuss any state, local or foreign tax consequences associated
with the acquisition, ownership, sale or other disposition of
our common stock or our election to be taxed as a REIT.
You are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the
specific tax consequences to you of:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition, ownership, and/or sale or other disposition
of the common stock offered under this prospectus, including the
federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences, |
|
|
|
our election to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax
purposes, and |
|
|
|
potential changes in the tax laws. |
Taxation of Our Company
General. We will elect to be taxed as a REIT under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, commencing with our
taxable year ended December 31, 2004. We believe that we
have been organized and have operated in a manner that will
allow us to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code
commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2004,
and we intend to continue to be organized and operate in this
manner. However, qualification and taxation as a REIT depend
upon our ability to meet the various qualification tests imposed
under the Code, including through our actual annual operating
results, asset composition, distribution levels and diversity of
stock ownership. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we
have been organized or operated in a manner so as to qualify, or
that we will remain qualified, as a REIT. See
Failure to Qualify.
The sections of the Code that relate to the qualification and
operation as a REIT are highly technical and complex. The
following sets forth the material aspects of the sections of the
Code that govern the federal income tax treatment of a REIT and
its stockholders. This summary is qualified in its entirety by
the applicable Code provisions, relevant rules and regulations
promulgated under the Code, and administrative and judicial
interpretations of the Code and those rules and regulations.
Latham & Watkins LLP has acted as our tax counsel in
connection with this offering of our common stock and our
election to be taxed as a REIT. Latham & Watkins LLP
rendered an opinion to us to the
105
effect that, commencing with our taxable year ended
December 31, 2004, we have been organized in conformity
with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT,
and our proposed method of operation will enable us to meet the
requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the
Code. It must be emphasized that this opinion is based on
various assumptions and representations as to factual matters,
including representations made by us in a factual certificate
provided by one of our officers. In addition, this opinion is
based upon our factual representations set forth in this
prospectus. Moreover, our qualification and taxation as a REIT
depend upon our ability to meet the various qualification tests
imposed under the Code which are discussed below, including
through actual annual operating results, asset composition,
distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership, the
results of which have not been and will not be reviewed by
Latham & Watkins LLP. Accordingly, no assurance can be
given that our actual results of operation for any particular
taxable year will satisfy those requirements. Latham &
Watkins LLP has no obligation to update its opinion subsequent
to its date. Further, the anticipated income tax treatment
described in this prospectus may be changed, perhaps
retroactively, by legislative, administrative or judicial action
at any time. See Failure to Qualify.
If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be
required to pay federal corporate income taxes on our net income
that is currently distributed to our stockholders. We will,
however, be required to pay federal income tax as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
First, we will be required to pay tax at regular corporate rates
on any undistributed REIT taxable income, including
undistributed net capital gains. |
|
|
|
Second, we may be required to pay the alternative minimum
tax on our items of tax preference under some
circumstances. |
|
|
|
Third, if we have (1) net income from the sale or other
disposition of foreclosure property held primarily
for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or
(2) other nonqualifying income from foreclosure property,
we will be required to pay tax at the highest corporate rate on
this income. Foreclosure property is generally property we
acquired through foreclosure or after a default on a loan
secured by the property or a lease of the property. |
|
|
|
Fourth, we will be required to pay a 100% tax on any net income
from prohibited transactions. Prohibited transactions are, in
general, sales or other taxable dispositions of property, other
than foreclosure property held primarily for sale to customers
in the ordinary course of business. |
|
|
|
Fifth, if we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the
95% gross income test, as described below, but have otherwise
maintained our qualification as a REIT because certain other
requirements are met, we will be required to a pay a tax equal
to (1) the greater of (A) the amount by which 75% of
our gross income exceeds the amount qualifying under the 75%
gross income test, and (B) the amount by which 95% of our
gross income (90% for our taxable year ended December 31,
2004) exceeds the amount qualifying under the 95% gross income
test, multiplied by (2) a fraction intended to reflect our
profitability. |
|
|
|
Sixth, if we fail to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests, as
described below, by more than a de minimis amount due to a
reasonable cause and we nonetheless maintain our REIT
qualification because of specified cure provisions, we will be
required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the
highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income
generated by the nonqualifying assets. |
|
|
|
Seventh, if we fail to satisfy any provision of the Code that
would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT (other than a
violation of the REIT gross income tests or certain violations
of the asset tests described below) and the violation is due to
reasonable cause, we may retain our REIT qualification but we
will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such
failure. |
|
|
|
Eighth, we will be required to pay a 4% excise tax to the extent
we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum
of (1) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year,
(2) 95% of |
106
|
|
|
|
|
our REIT capital gain net income for the year, and (3) any
undistributed taxable income from prior periods. |
|
|
|
Ninth, if we acquire any asset from a corporation which is or
has been a C corporation in a transaction in which the
basis of the asset in our hands is determined by reference to
the basis of the asset in the hands of the C corporation, and we
subsequently recognize gain on the disposition of the asset
during the ten-year period beginning on the date on which we
acquired the asset, then we will be required to pay tax at the
highest regular corporate tax rate on this gain to the extent of
the excess of (1) the fair market value of the asset over
(2) our adjusted basis in the asset, in each case
determined as of the date on which we acquired the asset. The
results described in this paragraph with respect to the
recognition of gain assume that the C corporation will refrain
from making an election to receive different treatment under
existing Treasury regulations on its tax return for the year in
which we acquire an asset from the C corporation. |
|
|
|
Tenth, we will be subject to a 100% tax on any
redetermined rents, redetermined
deductions or excess interest. In general,
redetermined rents are rents from real property that are
overstated as a result of services furnished by a taxable
REIT subsidiary of our company to any of our tenants.
Redetermined deductions and excess interest represent amounts
that are deducted by our taxable REIT subsidiary for amounts
paid to us that are in excess of the amounts that would have
been deducted based on arms-length negotiations. See
Penalty Tax. |
Requirements for Qualification as a Real Estate Investment
Trust. The Code defines a REIT as a corporation,
trust or association:
|
|
|
(1) that is managed by one or more trustees or directors, |
|
|
(2) that issues transferable shares or transferable
certificates to evidence its beneficial ownership, |
|
|
(3) that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but
for Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, |
|
|
(4) that is not a financial institution or an insurance
company within the meaning of certain provisions of the Code, |
|
|
(5) that is beneficially owned by 100 or more persons, |
|
|
(6) not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of
which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer
individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities)
during the last half of each taxable year, and |
|
|
(7) that meets other tests, described below, regarding the
nature of its income and assets and the amount of its
distributions. |
The Code provides that conditions (1) to (4),
inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and that
condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of
a taxable year of twelve months, or during a proportionate part
of a taxable year of less than twelve months.
Conditions (5) and (6) do not apply until after the
first taxable year for which an election is made to be taxed as
a REIT. For purposes of condition (6), pension funds and other
specified tax-exempt entities are generally treated as
individuals except that a look-through exception
applies with respect to pension funds.
We believe that we have been organized, and operated in a manner
that has or, as applicable, will allow us to satisfy
conditions (1) through (7) inclusive. In addition, our
charter provides for restrictions regarding the ownership and
transfer of our shares that are intended to assist us in
continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described
in (5) and (6) above. These stock ownership and transfer
restrictions are described in Description of
Securities Restrictions on Ownership and
Transfer. These restrictions, however, may not ensure that
we will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership
requirements described in (5) and (6) above. If we
fail to satisfy these share ownership requirements, except as
provided below, our status as a REIT will terminate. See
Failure to Qualify. If, however, we
comply with the rules contained in applicable Treasury
regulations that require us to ascertain the
107
actual ownership of our shares and we do not know, or would not
have known through the exercise of reasonable diligence, that we
failed to meet the requirement described in condition
(6) above, we will be treated as having met this
requirement.
In addition, we may not maintain our status as a REIT unless our
taxable year is the calendar year. We have and will continue to
have a calendar taxable year.
Ownership of Interests in Partnerships, Limited Liability
Companies and Qualified REIT Subsidiaries. In the case of a
REIT which is a partner in a partnership or a member in a
limited liability company treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes, Treasury regulations provide that the REIT
will be deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of
the partnership or limited liability company, as the case may
be, based on its interest in partnership capital, subject to
special rules relating to the 10% REIT asset test described
below. Also, the REIT will be deemed to be entitled to the
income of the partnership or limited liability company
attributable to its pro rata share of the assets of that entity.
The character of the assets and gross income of the partnership
or limited liability company retains the same character in the
hands of the REIT for purposes of Section 856 of the Code,
including satisfying the gross income tests and the asset tests.
Thus, our pro rata share of the assets and items of income of
our operating partnership, including our operating
partnerships share of these items of any partnership or
limited liability company in which it owns an interest, are
treated as our assets and items of income for purposes of
applying the requirements described in this prospectus,
including the income and asset tests described below. We have
included a brief summary of the rules governing the federal
income taxation of partnerships and limited liability companies
and their partners or members below in Tax
Aspects of Our Operating Partnership, the Subsidiary
Partnerships and the Limited Liability Companies. We have
control of our operating partnership and the subsidiary
partnerships and limited liability companies and intend to
continue to operate them in a manner consistent with the
requirements for our qualification as a REIT. In the future, we
may be a limited partner or non-managing member in a partnership
or limited liability company. If such a partnership or limited
liability company were to take actions which could jeopardize
our status as a REIT or require us to pay tax, we could be
forced to dispose of our interest in such entity. In addition,
it is possible that a partnership or limited liability company
could take an action which could cause us to fail a REIT income
or asset test, and that we would not become aware of such action
in a time frame which would allow us to dispose of our interest
in the partnership or limited liability company or take other
corrective action on a timely basis. In that case, we could fail
to qualify as a REIT unless entitled to relief, as described
below. See Failure to Qualify below.
We may from time to time own and operate certain properties
through wholly owned subsidiaries that we intend to be treated
as qualified REIT subsidiaries under the Code. A
corporation will qualify as our qualified REIT subsidiary if we
own 100% of its outstanding stock and we do not elect with the
subsidiary to treat it as a taxable REIT subsidiary,
described below. For federal income tax purposes, a qualified
REIT subsidiary is not treated as a separate corporation, and
all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and
credit of a qualified REIT subsidiary are treated as assets,
liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit (as the
case may be) of the parent REIT for all purposes under the Code,
including the REIT qualification tests. Thus, in applying the
requirements described in this prospectus, any qualified REIT
subsidiaries we own are ignored, and all assets, liabilities,
and items of income, deduction, and credit of such subsidiaries
are treated as our assets, liabilities and items of income,
deduction, and credit. A qualified REIT subsidiary is not
required to pay federal income tax, and our ownership of the
stock of a qualified REIT subsidiary will not violate the
restrictions on ownership of securities of any one issuer that
constitute more than 10% of the voting power or value of such
issuers securities or more than 5% of the value of our
total assets, as described below in Asset
Tests.
Ownership of Interests in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. A
taxable REIT subsidiary is a corporation other than a REIT in
which a REIT directly or indirectly holds stock, and that has
made a joint election with the REIT to be treated as a taxable
REIT subsidiary. A taxable REIT subsidiary also includes any
corporation, other than a REIT, with respect to which a taxable
REIT subsidiary owns securities possessing more than 35% of the
total voting power or value. Other than some activities relating
to lodging and health care facilities, a taxable REIT subsidiary
may generally engage in any business, including the
108
provision of customary or non-customary services to tenants of
its parent REIT. A taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to federal
income tax as a regular C corporation. In addition, a taxable
REIT subsidiary may be prevented from deducting interest on debt
funded directly or indirectly by its parent REIT if certain
tests regarding the taxable REIT subsidiarys debt to
equity ratio and interest expense are not satisfied. A
REITs ownership of securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries
is not subject to the 10% or 5% asset tests described
below, but is subject to a separate limitation on the ownership
of securities of taxable REIT subsidiaries.
We currently hold an interest in one taxable REIT subsidiary and
may acquire securities in additional taxable REIT subsidiaries
in the future.
Income Tests. We must satisfy two gross income
requirements annually to maintain our qualification as a REIT.
First, in each taxable year, we must derive directly or
indirectly at least 75% of our gross income, excluding gross
income from prohibited transactions, from investments relating
to real property or mortgages on real property, including
rents from real property and, in certain
circumstances, interest, or from certain types of temporary
investments. Second, in each taxable year, we must derive at
least 95% of our gross income, excluding gross income from
prohibited transactions, from income qualifying under the
75% test, or from dividends, interest and gain from the
sale or disposition of stock or securities, or from any
combination of the foregoing. For these purposes, the term
interest generally does not include any amount
received or accrued, directly or indirectly, if the
determination of all or some of the amount depends in whole or
in part on the income or profits of any person. However, an
amount received or accrued generally will not be excluded from
the term interest solely by reason of being based on
a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales.
Rents we receive from a tenant will qualify as rents from
real property for the purpose of satisfying the gross
income requirements for a REIT described above only if all of
the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the
income or profits of any person. However, an amount we receive
or accrue generally will not be excluded from the term
rents from real property solely by reason of being
based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales, |
|
|
|
We, or an actual or constructive owner of 10% or more of our
capital stock, must not actually or constructively own 10% or
more of the interests in the tenant, or, if the tenant is a
corporation, 10% or more of the voting power or value of all
classes of stock of the tenant. Rents received from such a
tenant that is a taxable REIT subsidiary, however, will not be
excluded from the definition of rents from real
property as a result of this condition if at least 90% of
the space at the property to which the rents relate is leased to
third parties, and the rents paid by the taxable REIT subsidiary
are comparable to rents paid by our other tenants for comparable
space. For taxable years beginning on or after January 1,
2005, whether rents paid by a taxable REIT subsidiary are
substantially comparable to rents paid by other tenants is
determined at the time the lease with the taxable REIT
subsidiary is entered into, extended, and modified, if such
modification increases the rents due under such lease; provided,
however, that if a lease with a controlled taxable REIT
subsidiary is modified and such modification results in an
increase in the rents payable by such taxable REIT subsidiary,
any such increase will not qualify as rents from real
property. For purposes of this rule, a controlled
taxable REIT subsidiary is a taxable REIT subsidiary in
which we own stock possessing more than 50% of the voting power
or more than 50% of the total value. |
|
|
|
Rent attributable to personal property, leased in connection
with a lease of real property, is not greater than 15% of the
total rent received under the lease. If this requirement is not
met, then the portion of the rent attributable to personal
property will not qualify as rents from real
property, and |
|
|
|
We generally must not operate or manage the property or furnish
or render services to our tenants, subject to a 1% de minimis
exception, other than through a taxable REIT subsidiary or an
independent contractor from whom we derive no revenue. We may,
however, perform services that |
109
|
|
|
|
|
are usually or customarily rendered in connection
with the rental of space for occupancy only and are not
otherwise considered rendered to the occupant of the
property. Examples of these services include the provision of
light, heat, or other utilities, trash removal and general
maintenance of common areas. In addition, we may employ an
independent contractor to provide customary services, or a
taxable REIT subsidiary, which may be wholly or partially owned
by us, to provide both customary and non-customary services to
our tenants without causing the rent we receive from those
tenants to fail to qualify as rents from real
property. Any amounts we receive from a taxable REIT
subsidiary with respect to the taxable REIT subsidiarys
provision of noncustomary services will, however, be
nonqualifying income under the 75% gross income test and, except
to the extent received through the payment of dividends, the 95%
REIT gross income test. |
We generally do not intend, and as a general partner of our
operating partnership, do not intend to permit our operating
partnership, to take actions we believe will cause us to fail to
satisfy the rental conditions described above. However, we may
intentionally fail to satisfy some of these conditions to the
extent we conclude, based on the advice of our tax counsel, the
failure will not jeopardize our tax status as a REIT. In
addition, with respect to the limitation on the rental of
personal property, we have not obtained appraisals of the real
property and personal property leased to tenants. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with our
determinations of value.
Income we receive that is attributable to the rental of parking
spaces at the properties will constitute rents from real
property for purposes of the REIT gross income tests if any
services provided with respect to the parking facilities are
performed by independent contractors from whom we derive no
income, either directly or indirectly, or by a taxable REIT
subsidiary. We believe that the income we receive that is
attributable to parking facilities meets these tests and,
accordingly, will constitute rents from real property for
purposes of the REIT gross income tests. From time to time, we
enter into hedging transactions with respect to one or more of
our assets or liabilities. Our hedging activities may include
entering into interest rate swaps, caps, and floors, options to
purchase these items, and futures and forward contracts. Except
to the extent provided by Treasury regulations, any income we
derive from a hedging transaction which is clearly identified as
such as specified in the Code, including gain from the sale or
disposition of such a transaction, will not constitute gross
income for purposes of the 95% gross income test, and therefore
will be exempt from this test, but only to the extent that the
transaction hedges indebtedness incurred or to be incurred by us
to acquire or carry real estate. Income from any hedging
transaction will, however, be nonqualifying for purposes of the
75% gross income test. The term hedging transaction,
as used above, generally means any transaction we enter into in
the normal course of our business primarily to manage risk of
interest rate or price changes or currency fluctuations with
respect to borrowings made or to be made, or ordinary
obligations incurred or to be incurred, by us. To the extent
that we hedge with other types of financial instruments, the
income from those transactions is not likely to be treated as
qualifying income for purposes of the gross income tests. We
intend to structure any hedging transactions in a manner that
does not jeopardize our status as a REIT.
To the extent our taxable REIT subsidiary pays dividends, we
generally will derive our allocable share of such dividend
income through our interest in our operating partnership. Such
dividend income will qualify under the 95%, but not the 75%,
REIT gross income test. We intend to monitor the amount of the
dividend and other income from our taxable REIT subsidiary and
we intend to take actions to keep this income, and any other
nonqualifying income, within the limitations of the REIT income
tests. While we expect these actions will prevent a violation of
the REIT income tests, we cannot guarantee that such actions
will in all cases prevent such a violation.
If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income
tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a
REIT for the year if we are entitled to relief under certain
provisions of the Code. Commencing with our taxable year
beginning January 1, 2005, we generally may make use of the
relief provisions if:
|
|
|
|
|
following our identification of the failure to meet the 75% or
95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we file a schedule
with the Internal Revenue Service setting forth each item of our
gross |
110
|
|
|
|
|
income for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for
such taxable year in accordance with Treasury regulations to be
issued; and |
|
|
|
our failure to meet these tests was due to reasonable cause and
not due to willful neglect, |
For our taxable year ended December 31, 2004, we generally
may avail ourselves of the relief provisions if:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to meet these tests was due to reasonable cause and
not due to willful neglect, |
|
|
|
we attach a schedule of the sources of our income to our federal
income tax return, and |
|
|
|
any incorrect information on the schedule was not due to fraud
with intent to evade tax. |
It is not possible, however, to state whether in all
circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these
relief provisions. For example, if we fail to satisfy the gross
income tests because nonqualifying income that we intentionally
accrue or receive exceeds the limits on nonqualifying income,
the IRS could conclude that our failure to satisfy the tests was
not due to reasonable cause. If these relief provisions do not
apply to a particular set of circumstances, we will not qualify
as a REIT. As discussed above in Taxation of
Our Company General, even if these relief
provisions apply, and we retain our status as a REIT, a tax
would be imposed with respect to our nonqualifying income. We
may not always be able to comply with the gross income tests for
REIT qualification despite periodic monitoring of our income.
Prohibited Transaction Income. Any gain that we realize
on the sale of property held as inventory or primarily for sale
to customers in the ordinary course of business, including our
share of any such gain realized by our operating partnership,
either directly or through its subsidiary partnerships and
limited liability companies, will be treated as income from a
prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100% penalty tax.
This prohibited transaction income may also adversely affect our
ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.
Under existing law, whether property is held as inventory or
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a
trade or business is a question of fact that depends on all the
facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction.
Our operating partnership intends to hold its properties for
investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in
the business of acquiring, developing and owning its properties
and to make occasional sales of the properties as are consistent
with our operating partnerships investment objectives.
However, the IRS may successfully contend that some or all of
the sales made by our operating partnership or its subsidiary
partnerships or limited liability companies are prohibited
transactions. We would be required to pay the 100% penalty tax
on our allocable share of the gains resulting from any such
sales.
Penalty Tax. Any redetermined rents, redetermined
deductions or excess interest we generate will be subject to a
100% penalty tax. In general, redetermined rents are rents from
real property that are overstated as a result of services
furnished by our taxable REIT subsidiary to any of our tenants,
and redetermined deductions and excess interest represent
amounts that are deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary for
amounts paid to us that are in excess of the amounts that would
have been deducted based on arms-length negotiations.
Rents we receive will not constitute redetermined rents if they
qualify for the safe harbor provisions contained in the Code.
Our taxable REIT subsidiary currently does not provide any
services to our tenants. If, in the future, we employ a taxable
REIT subsidiary to provide services to our tenants, we intend to
set the fees paid to our taxable REIT subsidiary for such
services at arms length rates, although the fees paid may
not satisfy the safe harbor provisions referred to above. These
determinations are inherently factual, and the IRS has broad
discretion to assert that amounts paid between related parties
should be reallocated to clearly reflect their respective
incomes. If the IRS successfully made such an assertion, we
would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on the excess of an
arms length fee for tenant services over the amount
actually paid.
Asset Tests. At the close of each quarter of our taxable
year, we must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature and
diversification of our assets. First, at least 75% of the value
of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets,
cash, cash items and government securities. For purposes of this
test, real estate assets include stock or debt instruments that
are purchased with the proceeds of a stock offering or a public
offering of debt with a term of at least five years, but only
for the one-year period beginning on
111
the date we receive such proceeds. Second, not more than 25% of
our total assets may be represented by securities, other than
those securities includable in the 75% asset test. Third, of the
investments included in the 25% asset class, and except for
investments in REITs, qualified REIT subsidiaries, and taxable
REIT subsidiaries, the value of any one issuers securities
may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets, and we may
not own more than 10% of the total vote or value of the
outstanding securities of any one issuer except, in the case of
the 10% value test, certain straight debt
securities, having specified characteristics. Under the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004, or the 2004 Act, signed into law by
President Bush on October 22, 2004, certain types of
securities are disregarded as securities solely for purposes of
the 10% value test, including, but not limited to, any loan to
an individual or an estate, any obligation to pay rents from
real property and any security issued by a REIT. In addition,
under the 2004 Act, solely for purposes of the 10% value test,
the determination of our interest in the assets of a partnership
or limited liability company in which we own an interest will be
based on our proportionate interest in any securities issued by
the partnership or limited liability company, excluding for this
purpose certain securities described in the Code. This provision
of the 2004 Act was effective commencing with our taxable year
beginning January 1, 2005. Fourth, not more than 20% of the
value of our total assets may be represented by the securities
of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries.
To the extent that we own an interest in an issuer that does not
qualify as a REIT, a qualified REIT subsidiary, or a taxable
REIT subsidiary, we believe that the value of the securities of
any such issuer has not exceeded 5% of the total value of our
assets. Moreover, with respect to each issuer in which we own an
interest that does not qualify as a qualified REIT subsidiary or
a taxable REIT subsidiary, we believe that our ownership of the
securities of any such issuer has complied with the 10% voting
securities limitation and the 10% value limitation. We believe
that the aggregate value of our taxable REIT subsidiaries does
not exceed, and believe that in the future it will not exceed,
20% of the aggregate value of our gross assets. No independent
appraisals have been obtained to support these conclusions. In
addition, there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with
our determinations of value.
The asset tests must be satisfied not only on the last day of
the calendar quarter in which we, directly or through our
operating partnership, acquire securities in the applicable
issuer, but also on the last day of the calendar quarter in
which we increase our ownership of securities of such issuer,
including as a result of increasing our interest in our
operating partnership. For example, our indirect ownership of
securities of each issuer will increase as a result of our
capital contributions to our operating partnership or as limited
partners exercise their redemption/exchange rights. After
initially meeting the asset tests at the close of any quarter,
we will not lose our status as a REIT for failure to satisfy the
asset tests at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of
changes in asset values. If we fail to satisfy an asset test
because we acquire securities or other property during a
quarter, including as a result of an increase in our interest in
our operating partnership, we may cure this failure by disposing
of sufficient nonqualifying assets within 30 days after the
close of that quarter.
Commencing with our taxable year beginning January 1, 2005,
certain relief provisions may be available to us if we fail to
satisfy the asset tests described above after the 30 day
cure period. Under these provisions, we will be deemed to have
met the 5% and 10% REIT asset tests if the value of our
nonqualifying assets (i) does not exceed the lesser of
(a) 1% of the total value of our assets at the end of the
applicable quarter or (b) $10,000,000, and (ii) we
dispose of the nonqualifying assets or take other corrective
action within (a) six months after the last day of the
quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests is
discovered or (b) the period of time prescribed by Treasury
regulations to be issued. For violations due to reasonable cause
and not due to willful neglect that are in excess of the de
minimis exception described above, we may avoid disqualification
as a REIT under any of the asset tests, after the 30 day
cure period, by taking steps including (i) the disposition
of sufficient assets to meet the asset test or taking other
corrective action within (a) six months after the last day
of the quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests
is discovered or (b) the period of time prescribed by
Treasury regulations to be issued, (ii) paying a tax equal
to the greater of (a) $50,000 or (b) the highest
corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the
nonqualifying assets, and (iii) disclosing certain
information to the Internal Revenue Service.
112
Although we plan to take steps to ensure that we satisfy the
tests described above, there can be no assurance that our
efforts will always be successful, or will not require a
reduction in our operating partnerships overall interest
in an issuer. If we fail to timely cure any noncompliance with
the asset tests in a timely manner, and the relief provisions
described above are not available, we would cease to qualify as
a REIT. See Failure to Qualify below.
Annual Distribution Requirements. To maintain our
qualification as a REIT, we are required to distribute
dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to our
stockholders in an amount at least equal to the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
90% of our REIT taxable income, and |
|
|
|
90% of our after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure
property, minus |
|
|
|
the excess of the sum of certain items of non-cash income over
5% of our REIT taxable income. |
For these purposes, our REIT taxable income is
computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our
net capital gain. In addition, for purposes of this test,
non-cash income means income attributable to leveled stepped
rents, original issue discount on purchase money debt,
cancellation of indebtedness or a like-kind exchange that is
later determined to be taxable.
We generally must pay these distributions in the taxable year to
which they relate, or in the following taxable year if they are
declared during the last three months of the taxable year,
payable to stockholders of record on a specified date during
such period and paid during January of the following year. Such
distributions are treated as paid by us and received by our
stockholders on December 31 of the year in which they are
declared. In addition, at our election, a distribution for a
taxable year may be declared before we timely file our tax
return for such year and paid on or before the first regular
dividend payment after such declaration, provided such payment
is made during the twelve-month period following the close of
such year. These distributions are taxable to our stockholders,
other than tax-exempt entities, in the year in which paid. This
is so even though these distributions relate to the prior year
for purposes of our 90% distribution requirement. The amount
distributed must not be preferential i.e., every
stockholder of the class of stock to which a distribution is
made must be treated the same as every other stockholder of that
class, and no class of stock may be treated otherwise than in
accordance with its dividend rights as a class. To the extent
that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain, or
distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our REIT
taxable income, as adjusted, we will be required to pay
tax on that amount at regular corporate tax rates. We intend to
make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy these annual
distribution requirements and to minimize our corporate tax
obligations. In this regard, the partnership agreement of our
operating partnership authorizes us, as general partner, to take
such steps as may be necessary to cause our operating
partnership to distribute to its partners an amount sufficient
to permit us to meet these distribution requirements.
We expect that our REIT taxable income will be less than our
cash flow because of depreciation and other non-cash charges
included in computing REIT taxable income. Accordingly, we
anticipate that we will generally have sufficient cash or liquid
assets to enable us to satisfy the distribution requirements
described above. However, from time to time, we may not have
sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet these
distribution requirements due to timing differences between the
actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible
expenses, and the inclusion of income and deduction of expenses
in arriving at our taxable income. If these timing differences
occur, we may need to arrange for short-term, or possibly
long-term, borrowings or pay dividends in the form of taxable
stock dividends in order to meet the distribution requirements.
Under some circumstances, we may be able to rectify an
inadvertent failure to meet the distribution requirements for a
year by paying deficiency dividends to our
stockholders in a later year, which may be included in our
deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may
be able to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as
deficiency dividends. However, we will be required to pay
interest to the IRS based upon the amount of any deduction taken
for deficiency dividends.
113
Furthermore, we will be required to pay a 4% excise tax to the
extent we fail to distribute during each calendar year, or in
the case of distributions with declaration and record dates
falling in the last three months of the calendar year, by the
end of January immediately following such year, at least the sum
of 85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year, 95% of our
REIT capital gain income for the year and any undistributed
taxable income from prior periods. Any REIT taxable income and
net capital gain on which this excise tax is imposed for any
year is treated as an amount distributed during that year for
purposes of calculating such tax.
Like-Kind Exchanges. We may dispose of properties in
transactions intended to qualify as like-kind exchanges under
the Code. Such like-kind exchanges are intended to result in the
deferral of gain for federal income tax purposes. The failure of
any such transaction to qualify as a like-kind exchange could
subject us to federal income tax, possibly including the 100%
prohibited transaction tax, depending on the facts and
circumstances surrounding the particular transaction.
Failure To Qualify
Commencing with our taxable year beginning January 1, 2005,
specified cure provisions will be available to us in the event
that we violate a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that
would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT. These cure
provisions would reduce the instances that could lead to our
disqualification as a REIT for violations due to reasonable
cause and would instead generally require the payment of a
monetary penalty.
If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable
year, and the relief provisions described above do not apply, we
will be required to pay tax, including any applicable
alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular
corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in
which we fail to qualify as a REIT will not be deductible by us,
and we will not be required to distribute any amounts to our
stockholders. As a result, we anticipate that our failure to
qualify as a REIT would reduce the cash available for
distribution by us to our stockholders. In addition, if we fail
to qualify as a REIT, all distributions to stockholders will be
taxable as regular corporate dividends to the extent of our
current and accumulated earnings and profits. In this event,
corporate distributees may be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction. Unless entitled to relief under
specific statutory provisions, we will also be disqualified from
taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year
during which we lost our qualification. It is not possible to
state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to this
statutory relief.
Tax Aspects of Our Operating Partnership, the Subsidiary
Partnerships and the Limited Liability Companies
General. All of our investments are held indirectly
through our operating partnership. In addition, our operating
partnership holds certain of its investments indirectly through
subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies which we
expect will be treated as partnerships (or disregarded entities)
for federal income tax purposes. In general, entities that are
classified as partnerships (or disregarded entities) for federal
income tax purposes are pass-through entities which
are not required to pay federal income tax. Rather, partners or
members of such entities are allocated their shares of the items
of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of the entity, and
are potentially required to pay tax thereon, without regard to
whether the partners or members receive a distribution of cash
from the entity. We include in our income our pro rata share of
the foregoing items for purposes of the various REIT income
tests and in the computation of our REIT taxable income.
Moreover, for purposes of the REIT asset tests, we include our
pro rata share of assets held by our operating partnership,
including its share of its subsidiary partnerships and limited
liability companies. See Taxation of Our
Company.
Entity Classification. Our interests in our operating
partnership and the subsidiary partnerships and limited
liability companies involve special tax considerations,
including the possibility that the IRS might challenge the
status of one or more of these entities as a partnership (or
disregarded entity), as opposed to an association taxable as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes. If our operating
partnership, or a
114
subsidiary partnership or limited liability company, were
treated as an association, it would be taxable as a corporation
and would be required to pay an entity-level tax on its income.
In this situation, the character of our assets and items of
gross income would change and prevent us from satisfying the
REIT asset tests and possibly the income tests. See
Taxation of Our Company Asset
Tests and Income Tests. This, in
turn, would prevent us from qualifying as a REIT. See
Failure to Qualify for a discussion of
the effect of our failure to meet these tests for a taxable
year. In addition, a change in our operating partnerships
or a subsidiary partnerships or limited liability
companys status for tax purposes might be treated as a
taxable event. If so, we might incur a tax liability without any
related cash distributions.
A domestic business entity not otherwise organized as a
corporation and which has at least two members, an
eligible entity, that did not exist, or did not
claim a classification, prior to January 1, 1997, will be
classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes
unless it elects otherwise. Our operating partnership and each
of our other partnerships and limited liability companies intend
to claim classification as a partnership. As a result, we
believe these entities will be classified as partnerships for
federal income tax purposes.
Allocations of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction. The
partnership agreement generally provides that items of operating
income and loss will be allocated to the holders of units in
proportion to the number of units held by each such unit holder.
Certain limited partners have agreed to guarantee debt of our
operating partnership, either directly or indirectly through an
agreement to make capital contributions to our operating
partnership under limited circumstances. As a result of these
guarantees or contribution agreements, and notwithstanding the
foregoing discussion of allocations of income and loss of our
operating partnership to holders of units, such limited partners
could under limited circumstances be allocated a
disproportionate amount of net loss upon a liquidation of our
operating partnership, which net loss would have otherwise been
allocable to us.
If an allocation of partnership income or loss does not comply
with the requirements of Section 704(b) of the Code and the
Treasury regulations thereunder, the item subject to the
allocation will be reallocated in accordance with the
partners interests in the partnership. This reallocation
will be determined by taking into account all of the facts and
circumstances relating to the economic arrangement of the
partners with respect to such item. Our operating
partnerships allocations of taxable income and loss are
intended to comply with the requirements of Section 704(b)
of the Code and the Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder.
Tax Allocations With Respect to the Properties. Under
Section 704(c) of the Code, income, gain, loss and
deduction attributable to appreciated or depreciated property
that is contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest
in the partnership, must be allocated in a manner so that the
contributing partner is charged with the unrealized gain or
benefits from the unrealized loss associated with the property
at the time of the contribution. The amount of the unrealized
gain or unrealized loss is generally equal to the difference
between the fair market value or book value and the adjusted tax
basis of the contributed property at the time of contribution,
as adjusted from time to time. These allocations are solely for
federal income tax purposes and do not affect the book capital
accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among the
partners. Appreciated property was contributed to our operating
partnership in exchange for interests in our operating
partnership in connection with the formation transactions. The
partnership agreement requires that these allocations be made in
a manner consistent with Section 704(c) of the Code.
Treasury regulations issued under Section 704(c) of the
Code provide partnerships with a choice of several methods of
accounting for book-tax differences. We and our operating
partnership have agreed to use the traditional
method for accounting for book-tax differences for the
properties initially contributed to our operating partnership.
Under the traditional method, which is the least favorable
method from our perspective, the carryover basis of contributed
interests in the properties in the hands of our operating
partnership (i) will or could cause us to be allocated
lower amounts of depreciation deductions for tax purposes than
would be allocated to us if all contributed properties were to
have a tax basis equal to their fair market value at the time of
the contribution and (ii) could cause us to be allocated
taxable gain in the event of a sale of such contributed
interests or properties in excess of the economic or book income
allocated to us as a result of such sale, with a corresponding
benefit to the other
115
partners in our operating partnership. An allocation described
in (ii) above might cause us or the other partners to
recognize taxable income in excess of cash proceeds in the event
of a sale or other disposition of property, which might
adversely affect our ability to comply with the REIT
distribution requirements. See Taxation of Our
Company Requirements for Qualification as a Real
Estate Investment Trust and Annual
Distribution Requirements. To the extent our depreciation
is reduced, or our gain on sale is increased, stockholders may
recognize additional dividend income without an increase in
distributions.
Any property acquired by our operating partnership in a taxable
transaction will initially have a tax basis equal to its fair
market value, and Section 704(c) of the Code will not apply.
Federal Income Tax Considerations for Holders of Our Common
Stock
The following summary describes the principal United States
federal income tax consequences to U.S. stockholders (as
defined below) of purchasing, owning and disposing of our common
stock. This summary deals only with common stock held as a
capital asset (generally, property held for
investment within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code).
It does not address all the tax consequences that may be
relevant to you in light of your particular circumstances. In
addition, it does not address the tax consequences relevant to
persons who receive special treatment under the federal income
tax law, except where specifically noted. Holders receiving
special treatment include, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
financial institutions, banks and thrifts, |
|
|
|
insurance companies, |
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations, |
|
|
|
S corporations, |
|
|
|
regulated investment companies and REITs, |
|
|
|
foreign corporations and persons who are not residents or
citizens of the United States, |
|
|
|
partnerships or other entities treated as partnerships for
U.S. income tax purposes, |
|
|
|
dealers in securities or currencies, |
|
|
|
persons holding our common stock as a hedge against currency
risks or as a position in a straddle, or |
|
|
|
United States persons whose functional currency is not the
United States dollar. |
If you are considering purchasing our common stock, you should
consult your tax advisors concerning the application of United
States federal income tax laws to your particular situation as
well as any consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of our common stock arising under the laws of any
state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction.
When we use the term U.S. stockholder, we mean
a holder of shares of our common stock who, for United States
federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
is a citizen or resident of the United States, |
|
|
|
is a corporation, partnership, limited liability company or
other entity created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States or of any state thereof or in the District of
Columbia unless, in the case of a partnership or limited
liability company, Treasury regulations provide otherwise, |
|
|
|
is an estate the income of which is subject to United States
federal income taxation regardless of its source, or |
|
|
|
is a trust whose administration is subject to the primary
supervision of a United States court and which has one or more
United States persons who have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust. |
116
Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, to the extent provided
in the Treasury regulations, certain trusts in existence on
August 20, 1996, and treated as United States persons prior
to this date that elect to continue to be treated as United
States persons, also will be considered U.S. stockholders.
If you hold shares of our common stock and are not a
U.S. stockholder, you are a
non-U.S. stockholder.
Taxation of Taxable U.S. Stockholders Generally
Distributions Generally. Distributions out of our current
or accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as dividends
and, other than with respect to capital gain dividends, and
certain amounts that have previously been subject to corporate
revel tax, discussed below, will be taxable to our taxable
U.S. stockholders as ordinary income. See
Tax Rates below. As long as we qualify
as a REIT, these distributions will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction in the case of
U.S. stockholders that are corporations.
To the extent that we make distributions in excess of our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, these
distributions will be treated first as a tax-free return of
capital to each U.S. stockholder. This treatment will
reduce the adjusted tax basis that each U.S. stockholder
has in its shares of stock for tax purposes by the amount of the
distribution, but not below zero. Distributions in excess of a
U.S. stockholders adjusted tax basis in his shares
will be taxable as capital gains. Such gain will be taxable as
long-term capital gain if the shares have been held for more
than one year. Dividends we declare in October, November, or
December of any year and which are payable to a stockholder of
record on a specified date in any of these months will be
treated as both paid by us and received by the stockholder on
December 31 of that year, provided we actually pay the
dividend on or before January 31 of the following year.
U.S. stockholders may not include in their own income tax
returns any of our net operating losses or capital losses.
Capital Gain Distributions. Distributions that we
properly designate as capital gain dividends will be taxable to
our taxable U.S. stockholders as gain from the sale or
disposition of a capital asset, to the extent that such gain
does not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable
year. As described in Tax Rates below,
these gains may be taxable to non-corporate
U.S. stockholders at a 15% or 25% rate.
U.S. stockholders that are corporations may, however, be
required to treat up to 20% of some capital gain dividends as
ordinary income.
Passive Activity Losses and Investment Interest
Limitations. Distributions we make and gain arising from the
sale or exchange by a U.S. stockholder of our shares will
not be treated as passive activity income. As a result,
U.S. stockholders generally will not be able to apply any
passive losses against this income or gain. A
U.S. stockholder may elect to treat capital gain dividends,
capital gains from the disposition of stock and qualified
dividend income as investment income for purposes of computing
the investment interest limitation, but in such case, the
stockholder will be taxed at ordinary income rates on such
amount. Other distributions made by us, to the extent they do
not constitute a return of capital, generally will be treated as
investment income for purposes of computing the investment
interest limitation.
Retention of Capital Gains. We may elect to retain,
rather than distribute as a capital gain dividend, all or a
portion of our net capital gains. If we make this election, we
would pay tax on our retained net capital gains. In addition, to
the extent we so elect, a U.S. stockholder generally would:
|
|
|
|
|
include its pro rata share of our undistributed net capital
gains in computing its long-term capital gains in its return for
its taxable year in which the last day of our taxable year
falls, subject to certain limitations as to the amount that is
includable, |
|
|
|
be deemed to have paid the capital gains tax imposed on us on
the designated amounts included in the
U.S. stockholders capital gains, |
|
|
|
receive a credit or refund for the amount of tax deemed paid by
it, |
117
|
|
|
|
|
increase the adjusted basis of its common stock by the
difference between the amount of includable gains and the tax
deemed to have been paid by it, and |
|
|
|
in the case of a U.S. stockholder that is a corporation,
appropriately adjust its earnings and profits for the retained
capital gains in accordance with Treasury regulations to be
promulgated by the IRS. |
Dispositions of Our Common Stock. If a
U.S. stockholder sells or disposes of its shares of our
common stock, it will recognize gain or loss for federal income
tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the
amount of cash and the fair market value of any property
received on the sale or other disposition and its adjusted basis
in the shares for tax purposes. This gain or loss will be
capital if it has held the common stock as a capital asset. This
gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if it has
held the common stock for more than one year. In general, if a
U.S. stockholder recognizes loss upon the sale or other
disposition of our common stock that it has held for six months
or less, after applying certain holding period rules, the loss
recognized will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the
extent the U.S. stockholder received distributions from us
which were required to be treated as long-term capital gains.
Tax Rates. The maximum tax rate for non-corporate
taxpayers for (i) capital gains, including capital
gain dividends, has generally been reduced to 15%
(although depending on the characteristics of the assets which
produced these gains and on designations which we may make,
certain capital gain dividends may be taxed at a 25% rate) and
(ii) qualified dividend income has generally
been reduced to 15%. In general, dividends payable by REITs are
not eligible for the reduced tax rate on corporate dividends,
except to the extent certain holding requirements have been met
and the REITs dividends are attributable to dividends
received from taxable corporations (such as our taxable REIT
subsidiary), to income that was subject to tax at the corporate/
REIT level (for example, if we distribute taxable income that we
retained and paid tax on in the prior taxable year) or to
dividends properly designated by us as capital gain
dividends. The applicable provisions of the United States
federal income tax laws relating to the 15% tax rate are
currently scheduled to sunset or revert back to the
provisions of prior law effective for taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2008, at which time the capital gains
tax rate will be increased to 20% and the rate applicable to
dividends will be increased to the tax rate then applicable to
ordinary income.
Backup Withholding
We report to our U.S. stockholders and the IRS the amount
of dividends paid during each calendar year, and the amount of
any tax withheld. Under the backup withholding rules, a
stockholder may be subject to backup withholding with respect to
dividends paid unless the holder is a corporation or comes
within certain other exempt categories and, when required,
demonstrates this fact, or provides a taxpayer identification
number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup
withholding, and otherwise complies with applicable requirements
of the backup withholding rules. A U.S. stockholder who
does not provide us with his correct taxpayer identification
number may also be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amount paid as
backup withholding will be creditable against the
stockholders federal income tax liability. In addition, we
may be required to withhold a portion of capital gain
distributions to any stockholders who fail to certify their
non-foreign status. See Taxation of
Non-U.S. Stockholders.
Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders
Dividend income from us and gain arising from a sale of our
stock will not be unrelated business taxable income to a
tax-exempt stockholder, except as described below. This income
or gain will be unrelated business taxable income, however, if a
tax-exempt stockholder holds its shares as debt financed
property within the meaning of the Code or if the shares
are used in a trade or business of the tax-exempt stockholder.
Generally, debt financed property is property, the
acquisition or holding of which was financed through a borrowing
by the tax-exempt stockholder.
For tax-exempt stockholders which are social clubs, voluntary
employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit
trusts, or qualified group legal services plans exempt from
federal
118
income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17)
or (c)(20) of the Code, respectively, income from an investment
in our shares will constitute unrelated business taxable income
unless the organization is able to properly claim a deduction
for amounts set aside or placed in reserve for certain purposes
so as to offset the income generated by its investment in our
shares. These prospective investors should consult their tax
advisors concerning these set aside and reserve requirements.
Notwithstanding the above, a portion of the dividends paid by a
pension-held REIT may be treated as unrelated
business taxable income as to certain trusts that hold more than
10%, by value, of the interests in the REIT. A REIT will not be
a pension-held REIT if it is able to satisfy the
not closely held requirement without relying on the
look-through exception with respect to certain trusts. As a
result of limitations on the transfer and ownership of stock
contained in our charter, we do not expect to be classified as a
pension-held REIT, and accordingly, the tax
treatment described above should be inapplicable to our
stockholders. However, because our stock will be publicly
traded, we cannot guarantee that this will always be the case.
Taxation of Non-U.S. Stockholders
The following discussion addresses the rules governing United
States federal income taxation of the ownership and disposition
of our common stock by non-U.S. stockholders. These rules
are complex, and no attempt is made herein to provide more than
a brief summary of such rules. Accordingly, the discussion does
not address all aspects of United States federal income taxation
and does not address state, local or foreign tax consequences
that may be relevant to a non-U.S. stockholder in light of
its particular circumstances. We urge non-U.S. stockholders
to consult their tax advisors to determine the impact of
federal, state and local income tax laws on the purchase,
ownership, and disposition of shares of our common stock,
including any reporting requirements.
Distributions generally. Distributions that are neither
attributable to gain from our sale or exchange of United States
real property interests nor designated by us as capital gains
dividends will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the
extent they are made to non-U.S. stockholders out of our
current accumulated earnings and profits. Such distributions
ordinarily will be subject to withholding of United States
federal income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be
specified by an applicable income tax treaty unless the
distributions are treated as effectively connected with the
conduct by the non-U.S. stockholder of a United States
trade or business. Under certain treaties, however, lower
withholding rates generally applicable to dividends do not apply
to dividends from a REIT. Certain certification and disclosure
requirements must be satisfied to be exempt from withholding
under the effectively connected income exemption. Dividends that
are treated as effectively connected with such a trade or
business will be subject to tax on a net basis at graduated
rates, in the same manner as dividends paid to
U.S. stockholders are subject to tax, and are generally not
subject to withholding. Any such dividends received by a
non-U.S. stockholder that is a corporation may also be
subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or
such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax
treaty.
We expect to withhold United States income tax at the rate of
30% on any dividend distributions made to a
non-U.S. stockholder unless:
|
|
|
|
|
a lower treaty rate applies and the non-U.S. stockholder
files with us an IRS Form W-8BEN evidencing eligibility for
that reduced treaty rate, or |
|
|
|
the non-U.S. stockholder files an IRS Form W-8ECI with
us claiming that the distribution is income effectively
connected with the non-U.S. stockholders trade or
business. |
Distributions in excess of our current or accumulated earnings
and profits will not be taxable to a non-U.S. stockholder
to the extent that such distributions do not exceed the
non-U.S. stockholders adjusted basis in our common
stock, but rather will reduce the adjusted basis of such stock.
To the extent that these distributions exceed a
non-U.S. stockholders adjusted basis in our common
stock, the distributions will give rise to gain from the sale or
exchange of such stock. The tax treatment of this gain is
described below.
119
We may be required to withhold 10% of any distribution that
exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits. While
we generally expect to withhold at a rate of 30% on the entire
amount of a distribution that is not attributable to gain from
the sale of United States real property interests, to the extent
we do not do so, we may withhold at a 10% rate. However, amounts
withheld should generally be refundable if it is subsequently
determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of our
current or accumulated earnings and profits.
Capital Gain Dividends and Distributions Attributable to a
Sale or Exchange of United States Real Property Interests.
Distributions to a non-U.S. stockholder that we properly
designate as capital gain dividends, other than those arising
from the disposition of a United States real property interest,
generally should not be subject to United States federal income
taxation, unless:
|
|
|
(1) the investment in our common stock is treated as
effectively connected with the non-U.S. stockholders
United States trade or business, in which case the
non-U.S. stockholder will be subject to the same treatment
as U.S. stockholders with respect to such gain, except that
a non-U.S. stockholder that is a foreign corporation may
also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax, as discussed
above; or |
|
|
(2) the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien
individual who is present in the United States for 183 days
or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions are
met, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be
subject to a 30% tax on the individuals capital gains. |
Pursuant to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act,
which is referred to as FIRPTA, distributions to a
non-U.S. stockholder that are attributable to gain from our
sale or exchange of United States real property interests
(whether or not designated as capital gain dividends) will cause
the non-U.S. stockholder to be treated as recognizing this
gain as income effectively connected with a United States trade
or business. Non-U.S. stockholders would thus be required
to file U.S. tax returns and would generally be taxed at
the same rates applicable to U.S. stockholders, subject to
a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident
alien individuals. Also, this gain may be subject to the 30%
branch profits tax in the hands of a non-U.S. stockholder
that is a corporation. We are also required to withhold and
remit to the IRS 35% of any distributions to
non-U.S. stockholders that are designated as capital gain
dividends, or, if greater, 35% of a distribution that could have
been designated as a capital gain dividend. The amount withheld
is creditable against the non-U.S. stockholders
United States federal income tax liability. We or any nominee
(e.g., a broker holding shares in street name) may rely on a
certificate of foreign status on IRS Form W-8BEN, IRS
Form W-8ELI (unless we or our nominee have actual knowledge
or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a United States
person) or IRS Form W-9, to determine whether withholding
is required on gains realized from the disposition of United
States real property interests. A domestic person who holds
shares of our common stock on behalf of a
non-U.S. stockholder will bear the burden of withholding
provided that we have designated the appropriate portion of a
distribution as a capital gain dividend. However, any
distribution with respect to any class of stock which is
regularly traded on an established securities market located in
the United States is not subject to FIRPTA, and therefore, not
subject to the 35% U.S. withholding tax described above, if
the non-United States stockholder did not own more than 5% of
such class of stock at any time during the taxable year.
Instead, such distributions will be treated as ordinary dividend
distributions.
Retention of Net Capital Gains. Although the law is not
clear on the matter, it appears that amounts designated by us as
retained capital gains in respect of the common stock held by
U.S. stockholders should generally be treated with respect
to non-U.S. stockholders in the same manner as actual
distributions by us of capital gain dividends. Under that
approach, the non-U.S. stockholders would be able to offset
as a credit against their United States federal income tax
liability resulting from their proportionate share of the tax
paid by us on such retained gains, and to receive from the IRS a
refund to the extent their proportionate share of this tax paid
by us exceeds their actual United States federal income tax
liability.
Sale of Our Common Stock. Gain recognized by a
non-U.S. stockholder upon the sale or exchange of our
common stock will generally not be subject to United States
taxation unless the stock constitutes a United States real
property interest within the meaning of FIRPTA. The stock
will not constitute a
120
United States real property interest so long as we
are a domestically-controlled REIT. A
domestically-controlled REIT is a REIT in which at
all times during a specified testing period less than 50% in
value of its stock is held directly or indirectly by
non-U.S. stockholders. We believe that we have been a
domestically-controlled REIT and, therefore, that the sale by a
non-U.S. stockholder of our common stock will not be
subject to tax under FIRPTA. Because our common stock is
publicly traded, however, no assurance can be given that we are
or will continue to be a domestically-controlled REIT.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, gain from the sale or exchange of
our common stock not otherwise subject to FIRPTA will be taxable
to a non-U.S. stockholder if either (a) the investment
in our common stock is treated as effectively connected with the
non-U.S. stockholders United States trade or business
or (b) the non-U.S. stockholder is a nonresident alien
individual who is present in the United States for 183 days
or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions are
met.
Even if we do not qualify as a domestically-controlled
REIT at the time a non-U.S. stockholder sells our
common stock, gain arising from the sale or exchange by a
non-U.S. stockholder of our shares of common stock would
not be subject to United States taxation under FIRPTA as a sale
of a United States real property interest if the
shares are regularly traded, as defined by
applicable Treasury regulations, on an established securities
market such as the NYSE, and the selling
non-U.S. stockholder owned actually or constructively no
more than 5% of our common stock throughout the five-year period
ending on the date of the sale or exchange. If gain on the sale
or exchange of shares of stock were subject to taxation under
FIRPTA, the non-U.S. stockholder would be required to pay
regular United States federal income tax with respect to the
gain in the same manner as a taxable U.S. stockholder
(subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and a special
alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien
individuals) and the purchaser of the common stock would be
required to withhold and remit to the IRS 10% of the purchase
price.
Backup Withholding Tax and Information Reporting.
Generally, we must report annually to the IRS the amount of
dividends paid to a non-U.S. stockholder, such
holders name and address, and the amount of tax withheld,
if any. A similar report is sent to the
non-U.S. stockholder. Pursuant to tax treaties or other
agreements, the IRS may make its reports available to tax
authorities in the non-U.S. stockholders country of
residence.
Payments of dividends or of proceeds from the disposition of
stock made to a non-U.S. stockholder may be subject to
information reporting and backup withholding unless such holder
establishes an exemption, for example, by properly certifying
its non-United States status on an IRS From W-8BEN or another
appropriate version of IRS From W-8. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, backup withholding and information reporting may
apply if either we or our paying agent has actual knowledge, or
reason to know, that a non-U.S. stockholder is a United
States person.
Other Tax Consequences
State, local and foreign income tax laws may differ
substantially from the corresponding federal income tax laws,
and this discussion does not purport to describe any aspect of
the tax laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction. You
should consult you tax advisor regarding the effect of state and
local tax laws with respect to our tax treatment as a REIT and
on an investment in our common stock.
121
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
ERISA Considerations
The following is a summary of certain material considerations
arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, as amended, or ERISA, and the prohibited transaction
provisions of Section 4975 of the Code that may be relevant
to a prospective purchaser. The following summary may also be
relevant to a prospective purchaser that is not an employee
benefit plan which is subject to ERISA, but is a tax-qualified
retirement plan or an individual retirement account, individual
retirement annuity, medical savings account or education
individual retirement account, which we refer to collectively as
an IRA. This discussion does not address all aspects
of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Code or, to the extent not
preempted, state law that may be relevant to particular employee
benefit plan stockholders in light of their particular
circumstances, including plans subject to Title I of ERISA,
other employee benefit plans and IRAs subject to the prohibited
transaction provisions of Section 4975 of the Code, and
governmental, church, foreign and other plans that are exempt
from ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code but that may be
subject to other federal, state, local or foreign law
requirements.
A fiduciary making the decision to invest in shares of our
common stock on behalf of a prospective purchaser which is an
ERISA plan, a tax qualified retirement plan, an IRA or other
employee benefit plan is advised to consult its legal advisor
regarding the specific considerations arising under ERISA,
Section 4975 of the Code, and, to the extent not
pre-empted, state law with respect to the purchase, ownership or
sale of shares of our common stock by the plan or IRA.
Plans should also consider the entire discussion under the
heading Federal Income Tax Considerations, as
material contained in that section is relevant to any decision
by an employee benefit plan, tax-qualified retirement plan or
IRA to purchase our common stock.
Employee Benefit Plans, Tax-Qualified Retirement Plans and
IRAs
Each fiduciary of an ERISA plan, which is an
employee benefit plan subject to Title I of ERISA, should
carefully consider whether an investment in shares of our common
stock is consistent with its fiduciary responsibilities under
ERISA. In particular, the fiduciary requirements of Part 4
of Title I of ERISA require that:
|
|
|
|
|
an ERISA plan make investments that are prudent and for the
exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants and
beneficiaries in the plan, |
|
|
|
an ERISA plan make investments that are diversified in order to
reduce the risk of large losses, unless it is clearly prudent
for the ERISA plan not to do so, |
|
|
|
an ERISA plans investments must be authorized under ERISA
and the terms of the governing documents of the ERISA
plan, and |
|
|
|
the fiduciary may not cause the ERISA plan to enter into
transactions prohibited under Section 406 of ERISA (and
certain corresponding provisions of the Code). |
In determining whether an investment in shares of our common
stock is prudent for ERISA purposes, the appropriate fiduciary
of an ERISA plan should consider all of the facts and
circumstances, including whether the investment is reasonably
designed, as a part of the ERISA plans portfolio for which
the fiduciary has investment responsibility, to meet the
objectives of the ERISA plan, taking into consideration the risk
of loss and opportunity for gain or other return from the
investment, the diversification, cash flow and funding
requirements of the ERISA plan, and the liquidity and current
return of the ERISA plans portfolio. A fiduciary should
also take into account the nature of our business, the length of
our operating history and other matters described in the section
entitled Risk Factors.
The fiduciary of an IRA or an employee benefit plan that is not
subject to Title I of ERISA because it is a governmental
plan, a church plan (if no election has been made by the church
plan under Section 410(d) of the Code), or because the plan
does not cover common law employees, should consider
122
the extent to which investments by the IRA or plan are
authorized and not prohibited by the appropriate governing
documents, and are authorized and not prohibited under
Section 4975 of the Code and other applicable law.
Our Status Under ERISA
In some circumstances where an ERISA plan holds an interest in
an entity, the assets of the entity are deemed to be ERISA plan
assets. This is known as the plan asset rule. Under
those circumstances, the obligations and other responsibilities
of plan sponsors, plan fiduciaries and plan administrators, and
of parties in interest and disqualified persons, under
Parts 1 and 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA
and Section 4975 of the Code, as applicable, may be
expanded, and there may be an increase in their liability under
these and other provisions of ERISA and the Code (except to the
extent (if any) that a favorable statutory or administrative
exemption or exception applies). For example, a prohibited
transaction may occur if our assets are deemed to be assets of
investing ERISA plans and persons who have certain specified
relationships to an ERISA plan (parties in interest
within the meaning of ERISA, and disqualified
persons within the meaning of the Code) deal with these
assets. Further, if our assets are deemed to be assets of
investing ERISA plans, any person that exercises authority or
control with respect to the management or disposition of the
assets is an ERISA plan fiduciary.
ERISA plan assets are not defined in ERISA or the Code, but the
United States Department of Labor has issued regulations that
outline the circumstances under which an ERISA plans
interest in an entity will be subject to the plan asset rule.
The Department of Labor regulations apply to the purchase by an
ERISA plan of an equity interest in an entity, such
as stock of a REIT. However, the Department of Labor regulations
provide an exception to the plan asset rule for equity interests
that are publicly offered securities.
Under the Department of Labor regulations, a publicly
offered security is a security that is:
|
|
|
|
|
freely transferable, |
|
|
|
part of a class of securities that is widely held, and |
|
|
|
either part of a class of securities that is registered under
section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Exchange Act or sold to an
ERISA plan as part of an offering of securities to the public
pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act, and the class of securities of which this
security is a part is registered under the Exchange Act within
120 days, or longer if allowed by the Securities and
Exchange Commission, after the end of the fiscal year of the
issuer during which this offering of these securities to the
public occurred. |
Whether a security is considered freely transferable
depends on the facts and circumstances of each case. Under the
Department of Labor regulations, if the security is part of an
offering in which the minimum investment is $10,000 or less,
then any restriction on or prohibition against any transfer or
assignment of the security for the purposes of preventing a
termination or reclassification of the entity for federal or
state tax purposes will not ordinarily prevent the security from
being considered freely transferable. Additionally, limitations
or restrictions on the transfer or assignment of a security
which are created or imposed by persons other than the issuer of
the security or persons acting for or on behalf of the issuer
will ordinarily not prevent the security from being considered
freely transferable.
A class of securities is considered widely held if
it is a class of securities that is owned by 100 or more
investors independent of the issuer and of one another. A
security will not fail to be widely held because the
number of independent investors falls below 100 subsequent to
the IPO as a result of events beyond the issuers control.
The shares of our common stock offered in this prospectus may
meet the criteria of the publicly offered securities exception
to the plan asset rule, but we cannot guarantee that result.
First, the common stock could be considered to be freely
transferable, because the minimum investment will be less than
$10,000 and the only restrictions upon its transfer are those
generally permitted under the Department of
123
Labor regulations, those required under federal tax laws to
maintain our status as a REIT, resale restrictions under
applicable federal securities laws with respect to securities
not purchased pursuant to this prospectus and those owned by our
officers, directors and other affiliates, and voluntary
restrictions agreed to by the selling stockholder regarding
volume limitations.
Second, we expect (although we cannot guarantee) that our common
stock will be held by 100 or more investors, and we expect that
at least 100 or more of these investors will be independent of
us and of one another.
Third, the shares of our common stock will be part of an
offering of securities to the public pursuant to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act and the common
stock is registered under the Exchange Act.
In addition, the Department of Labor regulations provide
exceptions to the look-through rule for equity interests in some
types of entities, including any entity which qualifies as
either a real estate operating company or a
venture capital operating company.
Under the Department of Labor regulations, a real estate
operating company is defined as an entity which on testing
dates has at least 50% of its assets, other than short-term
investments pending long-term commitment or distribution to
investors, valued at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
invested in real estate which is managed or developed and with
respect to which the entity has the right to substantially
participate directly in the management or development
activities, and |
|
|
|
which, in the ordinary course of its business, is engaged
directly in real estate management or development activities. |
According to those same regulations, a venture capital
operating company is defined as an entity which on testing
dates has at least 50% of its assets, other than short-term
investments pending long-term commitment or distribution to
investors, valued at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
invested in one or more operating companies with respect to
which the entity has management rights, and |
|
|
|
which, in the ordinary course of its business, actually
exercises its management rights with respect to one or more of
the operating companies in which it invests. |
We have not endeavored to determine whether we will satisfy the
real estate operating company or venture
capital operating company exception.
Prior to making an investment in the shares offered in this
prospectus, prospective employee benefit plan investors (whether
or not subject to ERISA or section 4975 of the Code) should
consult with their legal and other advisors concerning the
impact of ERISA and the Code (and, particularly in the case of
non-ERISA plans and arrangements, any additional state, local
and foreign law considerations), as applicable, and the
potential consequences in their specific circumstances of an
investment in such shares.
124
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions in an underwriting agreement
dated
[ ],
2005, the underwriters named below, for whom Raymond
James & Associates, Inc. is acting as representative,
have severally agreed to purchase from us the respective number
of common shares set forth opposite their names:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriter |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
KeyBanc Capital Markets, a division of McDonald Investments
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Legg Mason Wood Walker, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,000,000 |
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
underwriters to purchase and accept delivery of the common
shares offered by this prospectus are subject to approval by
their counsel of legal matters and to other conditions set forth
in the underwriting agreement. The underwriters are obligated to
purchase and accept delivery of all shares of our common stock
offered by this prospectus, if any of the shares are purchased,
other than those covered by the over-allotment option described
below.
The underwriters propose to offer our common stock directly to
the public at the public offering price indicated on the cover
page of this prospectus and to various dealers at that price
less a concession not in excess of
$ per
share. The underwriters may allow, and the dealers may re-allow,
a concession not in excess of
$ per
share to other dealers. If all the shares of common stock are
not sold at the public offering price, the underwriters may
change the public offering price and other selling terms. The
shares of our common stock are offered by the underwriters as
stated in this prospectus, subject to receipt and acceptance by
them. The underwriters reserve the right to reject an order for
the purchase of our common stock in whole or in part. In
connection with the offering, we expect to incur expenses of
approximately $500,000.
We have granted the underwriters an option, exercisable for
30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase from
time to time up to an aggregate of 1,650,000 additional shares
of our common stock to cover over-allotments, if any, at the
public offering price less the underwriting discounts set forth
on the cover page of this prospectus. If the underwriters
exercise this option, each underwriter, subject to certain
conditions, will become obligated to purchase its pro rata
portion of these additional shares based on the
underwriters percentage purchase commitment in this
offering as indicated in the table above. The underwriters may
exercise the over-allotment option only to cover over-allotments
made in connection with the sale of the common shares offered in
this offering.
125
The following table shows the amount per share and total
underwriting discounts we will pay to the underwriters (dollars
in thousands, except per share). The amounts are shown assuming
both no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Per | |
|
| |
|
|
Share | |
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discounts to be paid by us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
In connection with our IPO, we also granted to Raymond
James & Associates, Inc. until October 5, 2005, a
right of first refusal to provide all investment banking
services that we may seek. Investment banking services include,
without limitation, acting as co-lead manager for any
underwritten public offering by us, acting as co-lead placement
agent or financial advisor in connection with private securities
offerings by us, and acting as financial advisor in connection
with a sale or transfer by us of a majority of our stock or
assets, or our merger or consolidation with another entity.
In connection with our acquisition of the Lyme portfolio, we
have agreed to pay Raymond James & Associates, Inc. an
advisory fee of $1,375,000.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against various
liabilities that may arise in connection with this offering,
including liabilities under the Securities Act for errors or
omissions in this prospectus or the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part. However, we will not indemnify
the underwriters if the error or omission was the result of
information the underwriters supplied to us in writing for
inclusion in this prospectus or the registration statement. If
we cannot indemnify the underwriters, we have agreed to
contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make
in respect of those liabilities. Our contribution would be in
the proportion that the proceeds (after underwriting discounts
and commissions) that we receive from this offering bear to the
proceeds (from underwriting discounts and commissions) that the
underwriters receive. If we cannot contribute in this
proportion, we will contribute based on respective faults and
benefits, as set forth in the underwriting agreement.
Subject to specified exceptions, each of our executive officers
has agreed with the underwriters, for a period of 90 after the
date of this prospectus, not to offer, sell, contract to sell,
or otherwise dispose of or transfer any shares of our common
stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for
shares of our common stock, including any interests in the
operating partnership, without the prior written consent of
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. This agreement also
precludes any hedging collar or other transaction designed or
reasonably expected to result in a disposition of shares of our
common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for shares of our common stock.
In addition, we have agreed with the underwriters, for a period
of 90 days after the date of this prospectus, not to issue,
sell, offer or contract to sell, or otherwise dispose of or
transfer, any shares of our common stock or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock,
or file any registration statement with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (except a registration statement on
Form S-8 relating to our stock plan), without the prior
written consent of Raymond James & Associates, Inc.,
except that we may make grants of stock options or stock awards
under our existing stock plan, issue shares upon exercise of
those options, issue shares pursuant to our dividend
reinvestment plan (if any), issue shares in connection with
acquisitions of real property or real property companies, or
issue shares upon conversion of partnership units. However,
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. may, in its discretion
and at any time without notice, release all or any portion of
the securities subject to these agreements.
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to 3% of the
common stock being offered by this prospectus for sale to our
directors, employees, business associates and related persons at
the public offering price. The sales will be made by the
underwriters through a directed share program. We do not know if
these persons will choose to purchase all or any portion of this
reserved common stock, but any purchases they do make will
reduce the number of shares available to the general public. To
the extent the allotted shares are not purchased in the directed
share program, we will offer these shares to the public.
126
These persons must commit to purchase no later than the close of
business on the day following the date of this prospectus. Any
directors, employees or other persons purchasing such reserved
common stock will be prohibited from selling such stock for a
period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus. The
common stock issued in connection with the directed share
program will be issued as part of the underwritten offer.
Until the offering is completed, rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission may limit the ability of the underwriters
and various selling group members to bid for and purchase our
common shares. As an exception to these rules, the underwriters
may engage in activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise
affect the price of our common stock, including:
|
|
|
|
|
short sales, |
|
|
|
syndicate covering transactions, |
|
|
|
imposition of penalty bids, and |
|
|
|
purchases to cover positions created by short sales. |
Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for
the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market
price of our common stock while the offering is in progress.
Stabilizing transactions may include making short sales of our
common stock, which involve the sale by the underwriter of a
greater number of shares of common stock than it is required to
purchase in the offering, and purchasing common stock from us or
in the open market to cover positions created by short sales.
Short sales may be covered shorts, which are short
positions in an amount not greater than the underwriters
over-allotment option referred to above, or may be
naked shorts, which are short positions in excess of
that amount.
Each underwriter may close out any covered short position either
by exercising its over-allotment option, in whole or in part, or
by purchasing shares in the open market. In making this
determination, each underwriter will consider, among other
things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open
market compared to the price at which the underwriter may
purchase shares pursuant to the over-allotment option.
A naked short position is more likely to be created if the
underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure
on the price of the common stock in the open market that could
adversely affect investors who purchased in the offering. To the
extent that the underwriters create a naked short position, they
will purchase shares in the open market to cover the position.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid on selling group
members. This means that if the underwriters purchase shares in
the open market in stabilizing transactions or to cover short
sales, the underwriters can require the selling group members
that sold those shares as part of the offering to repay the
selling concession received by them.
As a result of these activities, the price of our common stock
may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the
open market. If the underwriters commence these activities, they
may discontinue them without notice at any time. The
underwriters may carry out these transactions on the NYSE, in
the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
The underwriters and their affiliates may provide in the future
investment banking, financial advisory, or other financial
services for us and our affiliates, for which they may receive
advisory or transaction fees, as applicable, plus out-of-pocket
expenses, of the nature and in amounts customary in the industry
for these financial services. The initial participating lenders
under some or all of our three credit facilities include
affiliates of Raymond James & Associates, Inc.,
RBC Capital Markets and KeyBanc Capital Markets. Other
underwriters and their affiliates may also participate in the
future. These entities will receive interest and principal
payments pursuant to the loan documents and customary fees for
acting in such capacities. A portion of the proceeds of this
offering will be used to pay off amounts outstanding under these
credit facilities.
127
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. extended a line of
credit to each of Alan D. Gold, John F. Wilson, II and
Matthew G. McDevitt for payment of federal and state taxes owed
in connection with each persons restricted stock awards.
The amount and number of pledged partnership units in connection
with each loan are set forth below. To the extent such officer
fails to pay the loan in full, Raymond James will have the right
to take title to the number of units set forth opposite such
persons name, subject to such officers pledges of
units to us pursuant to their contribution agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Pledged | |
Name |
|
Available | |
|
Units | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Alan D. Gold
|
|
$ |
950,000 |
|
|
|
291,667 |
|
John F. Wilson, II
|
|
$ |
550,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
Matthew G. McDevitt
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
22,274 |
|
A prospectus in electronic format may be available on the
Internet sites or through other online services maintained by
one or more of the underwriters and selling group members
participating in the offering, or by their affiliates. In those
cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and,
depending upon the underwriter or the selling group member,
prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. The
underwriters may agree with us to allocate a specific number of
shares for sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such
allocation for online distributions will be made by the
underwriters on the same basis as other allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on any underwriters or any selling group members
website and any information contained in any other website
maintained by the underwriters or any selling group member is
not part of the prospectus or the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved or
endorsed by us or any underwriters or any selling group member
in its capacity as underwriter or selling group member and
should not be relied upon by investors.
128
LEGAL MATTERS
Certain legal matters will be passed upon for us by
Latham & Watkins LLP, San Diego, California, and
for the underwriters by DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP,
Raleigh, North Carolina. Venable LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, has
issued an opinion to us regarding certain matters of Maryland
law, including the validity of the common stock offered hereby.
EXPERTS
The consolidated balance sheet of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, the balance sheet of
Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P., as of December 31, 2003,
and the related consolidated statements of income and
stockholders equity of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the period from August 11, 2004
(commencement of operations) through December 31, 2004, the
related statements of income and owners equity of Inhale
201 Industrial Road, L.P. for the period from January 1,
2004 through August 17, 2004 and the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, the related consolidated and
combined statement of cash flows of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
and subsidiaries and Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. for the
year ended December 31, 2004, the related statements of
cash flows of Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related financial
statement schedule III of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. as of
December 31, 2004 have been included herein and in the
registration statement in reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP,
independent registered public accountants, appearing elsewhere
herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The statements of revenues and certain expenses of the Lyme
Portfolio, Bridgeview, Nancy Ridge, Graphics Drive and
Phoenixville for the year ended December 31, 2004, have
been included herein and in the registration statement in
reliance upon the reports of KPMG LLP, independent accountants,
appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm
as experts in accounting and auditing. KPMG LLPs reports
refer to the fact that the statements of revenues and expenses
were prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and are
not intended to be a complete presentation of revenues and
expenses.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
registration statement on Form S-11, including exhibits,
schedules and amendments filed with this registration statement,
under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of our
common stock to be sold in this offering. This prospectus does
not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement and exhibits and schedules to the registration
statement. For further information with respect to our company
and the shares of our common stock to be sold in this offering,
reference is made to the registration statement, including the
exhibits to the registration statement. Statements contained in
this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other
document referred to in this prospectus are not necessarily
complete and, where that contract is an exhibit to the
registration statement, each statement is qualified in all
respects by the exhibit to which the reference relates. Copies
of the registration statement, including the exhibits and
schedules to the registration statement, may be examined without
charge at the public reference room of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Room 1024, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information about
the operation of the public reference room may be obtained by
calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0300. Copies of all or a portion of the registration
statement can be obtained from the public reference room of the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon payment of prescribed
fees. Our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including
our registration statement, are also available to you on the
Securities and Exchange Commissions website, www.sec.gov.
129
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-19 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-20 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income for BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc. for the three months ended March 31,
2005 (Unaudited) and for the period from August 11, 2004
through December 31, 2004, and Statements of Income for
Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. (Predecessor) for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 (Unaudited) and for the period
from January 1, 2004 through August 17, 2004 and for
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-21 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-22 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (Unaudited), Consolidated and Combined
Statements of Cash Flows for BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. (Predecessor) for the year
ended December 31, 2004, and Statements of Cash Flows for
Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. (Predecessor) for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 (Unaudited) and years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
F-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-24 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-43 |
|
|
Lyme Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-45 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-46 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-47 |
|
|
Bridgeview II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-50 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-51 |
|
|
Nancy Ridge:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-54 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-55 |
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
Graphics Drive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-57 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-58 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-59 |
|
|
Phoenixville:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-61 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-62 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-63 |
|
F-2
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements of
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
Company), as of March 31, 2005, and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and the year ended
December 31, 2004, are presented as if this common stock
offering and related transactions had occurred on March 31,
2005 for the pro forma consolidated balance sheet, and on the
first day of the period presented for the unaudited pro forma
consolidated statements of income.
The pro forma consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated historical financial
statements of the Company, Inhale 201 Industrial Road,
L.P., and the separate historical financial statements of Lyme
Portfolio, Bridgeview II, Nancy Ridge, Graphics Drive and
Phoenixville, and the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this
Prospectus. Adjustments have been made to give effect to the
properties contributed and acquired in connection with and
following our IPO in 2004. The remaining properties acquired
since December 31, 2004 are considered insignificant.
The pro forma consolidated financial statements do not purport
to represent the Companys financial position or the
results of operations that would actually have occurred assuming
the completion of the common stock offering and other
transactions, nor do they purport to project the Companys
financial position or results of operations as of any future
date or any future period.
F-3
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioMed | |
|
Lyme | |
|
Other | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Realty | |
|
Portfolio | |
|
Subsequent | |
|
Financing | |
|
This | |
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Transactions | |
|
Offering | |
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(A) | |
|
(B) | |
|
(C) | |
|
(D) | |
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental property, net
|
|
$ |
489,136 |
|
|
$ |
486,540 |
|
|
$ |
59,813 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,035,489 |
|
Property under development
|
|
|
5,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,373 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
15,570 |
|
|
|
(399,796 |
) |
|
|
(3,789 |
) |
|
|
399,796 |
|
|
|
229,139 |
|
|
|
11,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129,139 |
)(E) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
)(F) |
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,621 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
Accrued straight-line rents, net
|
|
|
4,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,224 |
|
Acquired above market leases, net
|
|
|
7,543 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,795 |
|
Deferred leasing costs, net
|
|
|
60,950 |
|
|
|
63,720 |
|
|
|
7,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,340 |
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
5,776 |
|
|
|
(1,951 |
)(G) |
|
|
5,513 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
601,617 |
|
|
$ |
153,716 |
|
|
$ |
67,826 |
|
|
$ |
405,572 |
|
|
$ |
(1,951 |
) |
|
$ |
1,226,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Mortgage notes payable, net
|
|
$ |
101,594 |
|
|
$ |
137,517 |
|
|
$ |
7,870 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
246,982 |
|
Secured term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Unsecured line of credit
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,025 |
|
|
|
55,572 |
|
|
|
(129,139 |
)(E) |
|
|
2,958 |
|
Unsecured term loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
(100,000 |
)(F) |
|
|
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,459 |
|
Dividends and distributions payable
|
|
|
9,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,262 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,466 |
|
Acquired lease obligations, net
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
16,199 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
159,258 |
|
|
|
153,716 |
|
|
|
67,826 |
|
|
|
405,572 |
|
|
|
(229,139 |
) |
|
|
557,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
435,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229,029 |
|
|
|
664,039 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
|
Dividends in excess of earnings
|
|
|
(11,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,951 |
) |
|
|
(12,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
419,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,188 |
|
|
|
647,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
601,617 |
|
|
$ |
153,716 |
|
|
$ |
67,826 |
|
|
$ |
405,572 |
|
|
$ |
(1,951 |
) |
|
$ |
1,226,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to pro forma consolidated balance sheet
and statements of income.
F-4
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
First | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
BioMed | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Lyme | |
|
Other | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
BioMed | |
|
|
Realty | |
|
2005 | |
|
Portfolio | |
|
Subsequent | |
|
Financing | |
|
This | |
|
Realty | |
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Transactions | |
|
Offering | |
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(AA) | |
|
(BB) | |
|
(CC) | |
|
(DD) | |
|
(EE) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
11,874 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,695 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,853 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
24,471 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
16,359 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,529 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
4,054 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
7,937 |
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,147 |
|
|
Equity in net income of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(6,758 |
) |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
(8,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interests
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
(6,758 |
) |
|
|
2,155 |
|
|
|
8,121 |
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(415 |
)(GG) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
5,900 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
$ |
(6,758 |
) |
|
$ |
2,169 |
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share basic(HH)
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share diluted(HH)
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding
basic(HH)
|
|
|
31,129,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,129,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted(HH)
|
|
|
34,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to pro forma consolidated balance sheet
and statements of income.
F-5
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
First | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third and | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
BioMed | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Lyme | |
|
Other | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Fourth | |
|
BioMed | |
|
|
Realty | |
|
2005 | |
|
Portfolio | |
|
Subsequent | |
|
Financing | |
|
This | |
|
Quarter 2004 | |
|
Realty | |
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Transactions | |
|
Offering | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(AA) | |
|
(BB) | |
|
(CC) | |
|
(DD) | |
|
(EE) | |
|
(FF) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
19,432 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
$ |
46,406 |
|
|
$ |
5,513 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38,937 |
|
|
$ |
111,696 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
13,955 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
41,142 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
28,654 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
61,739 |
|
|
|
7,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,153 |
|
|
|
154,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
10,030 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
5,011 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,222 |
|
|
|
33,093 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
9,919 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
|
|
16,453 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
15,725 |
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,961 |
|
|
|
42,807 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
10,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
22,602 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
30,741 |
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,641 |
|
|
|
102,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
30,998 |
|
|
|
2,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,512 |
|
|
|
51,506 |
|
|
Equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,110 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(27,032 |
) |
|
|
8,619 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
(28,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interests
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
22,888 |
|
|
|
2,399 |
|
|
|
(27,032 |
) |
|
|
8,619 |
|
|
|
10,955 |
|
|
|
23,003 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163 |
)(GG) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
22,888 |
|
|
$ |
2,399 |
|
|
$ |
(27,032 |
) |
|
$ |
7,725 |
|
|
$ |
10,955 |
|
|
$ |
21,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share basic(HH)
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share diluted(HH)
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding
basic(HH)
|
|
|
30,965,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,965,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted(HH)
|
|
|
33,767,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,767,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to pro forma consolidated balance sheet
and statements of income.
F-6
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Tabular amounts in thousands)
|
|
1. |
Adjustments to the Pro Forma Consolidated Balance Sheet |
The accompanying unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet
of the Company reflects adjustments for completed acquisitions
and the Companys proposed public offering of common shares
and related transactions as if all of the following occurred on
March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of the Lyme Portfolio for approximately
$531,000,000, including closing costs and an advisory fee to
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. of $1,375,000, which
occurred on May 31, 2005. In addition to cash paid and
financed by borrowings discussed below, consideration also
included the assumption of $137,517,000 of mortgage notes
payable (including premium of $6,313,000); |
|
|
|
Borrowings of $100,000,000 on a senior unsecured term loan,
$250,000,000 on a senior secured term loan, and approximately
$55,572,000 on our senior unsecured revolving credit facility.
This debt was incurred to partially fund the acquisition of the
Lyme Portfolio; |
|
|
|
The acquisition of Fresh Pond Research Park for $20,756,000,
which occurred on April 5, 2005; |
|
|
|
The acquisition of Coolidge Avenue for $10,833,000, which
occurred on April 5, 2005; |
|
|
|
The acquisition of Phoenixville for $13,206,000, which occurred
on April 5, 2005; |
|
|
|
The acquisition of Nancy Ridge for $12,800,000, which occurred
on April 21, 2005. Consideration paid for this acquisition
also included the assumption of $7,870,000 of a mortgage note
payable (including premium of $869,000). In addition a
$1,177,000 deposit for loan impounds was made by the Company; |
|
|
|
The acquisition of Dumbarton Circle for $6,320,000, excluding
$2,640,000 paid into escrow for tenant construction allowance,
which occurred on May 27, 2005; |
|
|
|
Public offering of 11,000,000 common shares at $21.86 per
share, with net proceeds of $229,139,000; |
|
|
|
Repayment of the $100,000,000 senior unsecured term loan and
approximately $129,139,000 of debt outstanding on the
Companys senior unsecured revolving credit facility using
proceeds from the offering. |
In the opinion of the Companys management, all material
adjustments necessary to reflect the effects of the preceding
transactions have been made. The unaudited pro forma
consolidated balance sheet is presented for illustrative
purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what the
actual financial position would have been had the common share
offering and other transactions described above occurred on
March 31, 2005, nor does it purport to represent the future
financial position of the Company.
The adjustments to the pro forma consolidated balance sheet as
of March 31, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
(A) Reflects the acquisition of the Lyme Portfolio from a
third party on May 31, 2005 for approximately $531,000,000,
including closing costs, consisting of cash payments of
$399,796,000 (see |
F-7
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
|
Note C for discussion of funding) and the assumption of
mortgage notes payable in the amount of $137,517,000 (including
premium of $6,313,000): |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental properties, net
|
|
$ |
486,540 |
|
Intangible assets, net(1)
|
|
|
66,972 |
|
Acquired debt premium(2)
|
|
|
(6,313 |
) |
Assumed lease obligation, net(1)
|
|
|
(16,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
531,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
A portion of the purchase price has been allocated to identified
intangible assets (liabilities) for (i) above-market and
below-market leases in the amounts of $3,252,000 and
$16,199,000, respectively, which are amortized to rental income
over the remaining non-cancelable term of the respective leases,
and (ii) the value of in-place leases and management
agreements in the amount of $63,720,000 which are amortized to
depreciation and amortization expense over the remaining
non-cancelable terms of the respective leases and management
agreements. |
|
|
(2) |
Debt premiums are recorded upon assumption of the notes at the
time of acquisition to account for above-market interest rates.
Amortization of these premiums is recorded as a reduction to
interest expense over the remaining terms of the respective
mortgages. |
|
|
|
(B) Reflects the acquisition of five other properties from
third parties subsequent to March 31, 2005 for
approximately $67,732,000, including loan impounds of $1,177,000
for the Nancy Ridge loan assumption, closing costs and payment
of deferred loan costs of $83,000. Consideration paid consisted
of cash payments of $60,814,000 (financed by borrowings on the
existing unsecured line of credit of $57,025,000 and cash on
hand of $3,789,000), the assumption of mortgage notes payable in
the amount of $7,870,000 (including $869,000 of debt premium)
for the Nancy Ridge acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh Pond | |
|
Coolidge | |
|
Phoenixville | |
|
Nancy Ridge | |
|
Dumbarton | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Rental properties, net
|
|
$ |
20,928 |
|
|
$ |
9,533 |
|
|
$ |
11,657 |
|
|
$ |
12,133 |
|
|
$ |
5,562 |
|
|
$ |
59,813 |
|
Loan impounds (restricted cash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
Tenant construction allowance (restricted cash)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
Intangible assets, net(1)
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
7,670 |
|
Cash received for tenant security deposits (restricted cash)
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Acquired debt premium(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(869 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(869 |
) |
Tenant deposits (restricted cash)
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(232 |
) |
Acquired lease obligation, net(1)
|
|
|
(2,663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
20,756 |
|
|
$ |
10,833 |
|
|
$ |
13,206 |
|
|
$ |
13,977 |
|
|
$ |
8,960 |
|
|
$ |
67,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition date
|
|
|
April 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
April 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
April 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
April 21, 2005 |
|
|
|
May 27, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
A portion of the purchase price has been allocated to identified
intangible liabilities for below-market leases in the amount of
$2,699,000, which are amortized to rental income over the
remaining non-cancelable term of the respective leases, and the
value of in-place leases and management agreements in the amount
of $7,670,000 which are amortized to depreciation and
amortization expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of
the respective leases and management agreements. |
|
|
(2) |
Premiums are recorded upon assumption of mortgages at the time
of acquisition to account for above-market interest rates.
Amortization of these premiums is recorded as a reduction to
interest expense over the remaining term of the respective notes. |
|
|
|
(C) To fund the acquisitions, the Company incurred the
following indebtedness: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
Loan | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Fees | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
$250.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility(1)
|
|
$ |
112,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,863 |
|
$100.0 million senior unsecured term loan
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
$250.0 million senior secured term loan
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
462,597 |
|
|
$ |
5,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Consists of $55,572 for the Lyme Portfolio and $57,025 for the
other subsequent acquisitions. |
|
|
|
(D) Sale of 11,000,000 shares of common stock for
$21.86 per share in this offering: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from this offering
|
|
$ |
240,460 |
|
Less costs associated with this offering (including
underwriters discount of $10,821)
|
|
|
(11,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash proceeds
|
|
$ |
229,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of certain indebtedness upon completion of this
offering: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal/Total | |
|
|
Cash Payments | |
|
|
| |
(E) $250.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit
facility
|
|
$ |
129,139 |
|
(F) $100.0 million senior unsecured term loan
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
229,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(G) Write-off of unamortized loan fees upon repayment of
certain indebtedness and pro forma amortization adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Writeoff of | |
|
|
Unamortized | |
|
|
Loan Fees | |
|
|
| |
$100.0 million unsecured line of credit (replaced)
|
|
$ |
901 |
|
$100.0 million senior unsecured term loan
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-9
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
2. |
Pro Forma Consolidated Statements of Income |
The adjustments to the pro forma consolidated statements of
income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and for
the year ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:
Adjustments (AA) through (HH) inclusive relate to the
pro forma adjustments made to give effect to the acquired
properties in accordance with Regulation S-X Rule 11-2
and Rule 3-14. Specifically, in accordance with
Rule 3-14(a)(1) audited financial statements of properties
acquired should exclude items not comparable to the proposed
future operations of the properties including corporate
expenses. Prior to the acquisition, the properties were either
self-managed or managed by third party management companies.
Following the acquisitions, the properties will continue to be
managed internally by us or managed by third-party managers
under new management contracts. In accordance with
Rule 3-14, the related management fee revenues and expenses
have either been included or excluded from the historical
audited Rule 3-14 financial statements. For properties that
will be managed internally by us, the property management
revenues and costs are excluded in the historical financial
statements of the acquired properties. For properties that will
be managed by third-parties, property management revenues and
expenses are included in the historical financial statements of
the acquired properties. Pro forma revenue and expense
adjustments were made for properties that will be managed
internally by us.
(AA) Reflects the first quarter 2005 acquisitions for the
period from January 1, 2005 through date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchasing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Waples | |
|
Bridgeview | |
|
Graphics | |
|
the Property | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental(1)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Real estate taxes(3)
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(228 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchasing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Waples | |
|
Bridgeview II | |
|
Graphics | |
|
the Property | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental(1)
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
1,408 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
1,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
Real estate taxes(3)
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(889 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The pro forma adjustment to rental revenue is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the property and consists of
amounts related to above and below market leases, which are
being amortized over the remaining non-cancelable term of the
respective contracts in accordance with SFAS 141. |
|
(2) |
The pro forma adjustment to tenant recoveries includes amounts
to be received from tenants related to the pro forma adjustment
to real estate taxes expense. |
|
(3) |
The pro forma adjustment to real estate taxes expense relates to
the increase in property taxes due to the acquisition of the
property by the Company that may result in a reassessment by the
taxing authorities based on the purchase price of the property. |
|
(4) |
The pro forma adjustment to depreciation and amortization is due
to depreciation of the acquired buildings and improvements using
the straight-line method and an estimated life of 40 years.
In addition, the value of in-place leases (exclusive of the
value of above and below market leases) and the value of
management agreements are amortized to depreciation and
amortization expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of
the respective leases and management agreements. |
F-11
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
(BB) Reflects the acquisition of the Lyme Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue and | |
|
Resulting from | |
|
|
|
|
Certain | |
|
Purchasing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
the Property | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental(1)
|
|
$ |
11,273 |
|
|
$ |
601 |
|
|
$ |
11,874 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries(2)
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
4,167 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
14,731 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
16,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations(3)
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
Real estate taxes(4)
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,054 |
|
|
|
4,054 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
11,422 |
|
|
|
(3,485 |
) |
|
|
7,937 |
|
|
Interest expense(6)
|
|
|
(2,203 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(2,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
$ |
(3,319 |
) |
|
$ |
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue and | |
|
Resulting from | |
|
|
|
|
Certain | |
|
Purchasing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
the Property | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental(1)
|
|
$ |
44,123 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
$ |
46,406 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries(2)
|
|
|
9,198 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
13,955 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
54,699 |
|
|
|
7,040 |
|
|
|
61,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations(3)
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
5,011 |
|
|
Real estate taxes(4)
|
|
|
5,344 |
|
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
9,919 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,725 |
|
|
|
15,725 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
10,113 |
|
|
|
20,628 |
|
|
|
30,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
44,586 |
|
|
|
(13,588 |
) |
|
|
30,998 |
|
|
Interest expense(6)
|
|
|
(8,711 |
) |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
(8,110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
35,875 |
|
|
$ |
(12,987 |
) |
|
$ |
22,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
(1) |
The pro forma adjustment to rental revenue is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the property and consists of
amounts related to above and below market leases, which are
being amortized over the remaining non-cancelable term of the
respective contracts in accordance with SFAS 141. |
|
(2) |
The pro forma tenant recovery revenue adjustment is based upon
an assignment of pre-existing management agreements with certain
tenants, as contractually entered into with the execution of the
purchase and sale agreement. Also includes, amounts to be
received from tenants related to the pro forma adjustment to
real estate taxes expense. |
|
(3) |
The pro forma adjustment to rental operations expense includes
amounts related to expenses associated with self-managed
properties. |
|
(4) |
The pro forma adjustment to real estate taxes expense relates to
the increase in property taxes due to the acquisition of the
property by the Company that may result in a reassessment by the
taxing authorities based on the purchase price of the property. |
|
(5) |
The pro forma adjustment to depreciation and amortization is due
to depreciation of the acquired buildings and improvements using
the straight-line method and an estimated life of 40 years.
In addition, the value of in-place leases (exclusive of the
value of above and below market leases) and the value of
management agreements are amortized to depreciation and
amortization expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of
the respective leases and management agreements. |
|
(6) |
The pro forma adjustment to interest expense is due to the
amortization of debt premiums that were recorded upon assumption
of the mortgage notes to account for above-market interest
rates. This adjustment reduces interest expense over the
remaining terms of the respective mortgages using the effective
interest method. Also includes amortization of deferred loan
fees, including loan assumption fees, incurred in obtaining
long-term financing, which are capitalized and amortized to
interest expense over the terms of the related loans using the
effective-interest method. |
F-13
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
(CC) Reflects the acquisition of five other properties from
third parties subsequent to March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy | |
|
|
|
Purchasing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Coolidge | |
|
Fresh Pond | |
|
Phoenixville | |
|
Ridge | |
|
Dumbarton | |
|
the Properties | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental(1)
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries(2)
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations(3)
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
Real estate taxes(4)
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(575 |
) |
|
|
664 |
|
|
Interest expense(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
(549 |
) |
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy | |
|
|
|
Purchasing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Coolidge | |
|
Fresh Pond | |
|
Phoenixville | |
|
Ridge | |
|
Dumbarton | |
|
the Properties | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental(1)
|
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
$ |
1,512 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
$ |
596 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
$ |
5,513 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries(2)
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
1,848 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
7,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations(3)
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
Real estate taxes(4)
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
1,508 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
(2,029 |
) |
|
|
2,821 |
|
Interest expense(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
$ |
578 |
|
|
$ |
(1,938 |
) |
|
$ |
2,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
(1) |
The pro forma adjustment to rental revenue is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the property and consists of
amounts related to above and below market leases, which are
being amortized over the remaining non-cancelable term of the
respective contracts in accordance with SFAS 141. |
|
(2) |
The pro forma tenant recovery revenue adjustment is based upon
an assignment of pre-existing management agreements with certain
tenants, as contractually entered into with the execution of the
purchase and sale agreement. Also includes, amounts to be
received from tenants related to the pro forma adjustment to
real estate taxes expense. |
|
(3) |
The pro forma adjustment to rental operations expense includes
amounts related to expenses associated with self-managed
properties. |
|
(4) |
The pro forma adjustment to real estate taxes expense relates to
the increase in property taxes due to the acquisition of the
property by the Company that may result in a reassessment by the
taxing authorities based on the purchase price of the property. |
|
(5) |
The pro forma adjustment to depreciation and amortization is due
to depreciation of the acquired buildings and improvements using
the straight-line method and an estimated life of 40 years.
In addition, the value of in-place leases (exclusive of the
value of above and below market leases) and the value of
management agreements are amortized to depreciation and
amortization expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of
the respective leases and management agreements. |
|
(6) |
The pro forma adjustment to interest expense is due to the
amortization of debt premiums that were recorded upon assumption
of the mortgage notes to account for above-market interest
rates. This adjustment reduces interest expense over the
remaining terms of the respective mortgages using the effective
interest method. Also includes amortization of deferred loan
fees, including loan assumption fees, incurred in obtaining
long-term financing, which are capitalized and amortized to
interest expense over the terms of the related loans using the
effective-interest method. |
(DD)Reflects the interest expense as a result of debt incurred
in connection with the acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
|
|
Principal | |
|
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Interest Rate | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$250.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility(1)
|
|
$ |
112,597 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
5,022 |
|
$100.0 million senior unsecured term loan(1)
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
$250.0 million senior secured term loan(2)
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
6.407 |
% |
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
|
16,018 |
|
Amortization of loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
462,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,758 |
|
|
$ |
27,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Borrowings under the line of credit and $100,000,000 senior
unsecured term loan bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus a
margin, which can vary between 120 basis points and
200 basis points depending on the overall leverage of the
Company. A margin of 135 basis was assumed based upon the
pro forma leverage of the Company. If LIBOR increased or
decreased by 0.125%, the estimated interest expense could
increase or decrease by approximately $266,000 annually. |
|
(2) |
The $250,000,000 senior secured term loan bears interest at
LIBOR plus a spread of 225 basis points. The Company has
entered into an interest-rate swap for a notional amount of
$250,000,000 which the |
F-15
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
|
Company believes will be fully effective in hedging changes in
the floating rate of the secured term loan and fixing the
overall interest rate at 6.407%. |
(EE) Reflects the net decrease in interest expense as a
result of the repayment of certain debt with the proceeds of the
offering. The following outlines the loans paid off upon
completion of the offering and the corresponding interest
expense that was eliminated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
Debt Repaid | |
|
Interest Rate | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$250.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility(1)
|
|
$ |
129,139 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
$ |
1,440 |
|
|
$ |
5,760 |
|
$100.0 million senior unsecured term loan
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
Write-off of unamortized loan fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(1,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
229,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,155 |
|
|
$ |
8,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes the historical line of credit balance that was also
repaid in connection with the offering. |
(FF) Reflects the third and fourth quarter 2004
acquisitions for the period from January 1, 2004 through
the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue and | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
|
|
|
Certain Expenses | |
|
Resulting from | |
|
|
|
|
through the Date | |
|
Purchasing | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
of Acquisition | |
|
the Property | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental(1)
|
|
$ |
38,863 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
38,937 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries(2)
|
|
|
16,003 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
54,866 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
55,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations(3)
|
|
|
17,002 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
17,222 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,961 |
|
|
|
15,961 |
|
|
General and administrative(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
20,319 |
|
|
|
23,322 |
|
|
|
43,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
34,547 |
|
|
|
(23,035 |
) |
|
|
11,512 |
|
|
Equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
Interest expense(6)
|
|
|
(2,716 |
) |
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
$ |
32,104 |
|
|
$ |
(21,149 |
) |
|
$ |
10,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
(1) |
The pro forma adjustment to rental revenue is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the property and consists of
amounts related to above and below market leases, which are
being amortized over the remaining non-cancelable term of the
respective contracts in accordance with SFAS 141. |
|
(2) |
The pro forma tenant recovery revenue adjustment is based upon
an assignment of pre-existing management agreements with certain
tenants, as contractually entered into with the execution of the
purchase and sale agreement. Also includes, amounts to be
received from tenants related to the pro forma adjustment to
real estate taxes expense. |
|
(3) |
The pro forma adjustment to rental operations expense includes
amounts related to expenses associated with self-managed
properties. |
|
(4) |
The pro forma adjustment to depreciation and amortization is due
to depreciation of the acquired buildings and improvements using
the straight-line method and an estimated life of 40 years.
In addition, the value of in-place leases (exclusive of the
value of above and below market leases) and the value of
management agreements are amortized to depreciation and
amortization expense over the remaining non-cancelable term of
the respective leases and management agreements. |
|
(5) |
The pro forma adjustment to general and administrative expenses
is due to additional expenses as a result of the acquisitions in
2004. |
|
(6) |
The pro forma adjustment to interest expense is due to the
amortization of debt premiums that were recorded upon assumption
of the mortgage notes to account for above-market interest
rates. This adjustment reduces interest expense over the
remaining terms of the respective mortgages using the effective
interest method. Also includes amortization of deferred loan
fees, including loan assumption fees, incurred in obtaining
long-term financing, which are capitalized and amortized to
interest expense over the terms of the related loans using the
effective-interest method. |
|
|
|
|
(GG) |
Allocate minority interest in net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total income before allocation to minority interest
|
|
$ |
8,121 |
|
|
$ |
23,003 |
|
|
Minority interest in loss of King of Prussia
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted income before allocation to minority interest of
operating partnership
|
|
$ |
8,230 |
|
|
$ |
23,326 |
|
Weighted average percentage allocable to minority interest of
operating partnership(1)
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
6.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(524) |
|
|
$ |
(1,486) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The minority interest allocation varies due to the effects of
historical weighted average shares outstanding during the
periods. |
F-17
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC.
NOTES TO PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF
INCOME (Continued)
|
|
|
|
(HH) |
The following is a reconciliation to net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months | |
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
Ended March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income attributable to common shares
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
7,706 |
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
$ |
21,840 |
|
|
Operating partnership unit share in earnings of minority
interest(1)
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income attributable to common shares
|
|
$ |
6,374 |
|
|
$ |
8,230 |
|
|
$ |
5,196 |
|
|
$ |
23,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
31,129,613 |
|
|
|
42,129,613 |
|
|
|
30,965,178 |
|
|
|
41,965,178 |
|
|
Diluted(2)
|
|
|
34,148,820 |
|
|
|
45,148,820 |
|
|
|
33,767,575 |
|
|
|
44,767,575 |
|
Pro forma earnings per share basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Does not include minority interest for the limited
partners interest in the King of Prussia property of
$109,000, $109,000, $145,000 and $323,000, respectively. |
|
(2) |
Pro forma diluted shares include 11,000,000 shares due to
the offering. |
F-18
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004, and the accompanying balance sheet of
Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P., as defined in
note 1, as of December 31, 2003, and the related
consolidated statements of income and stockholders equity
of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries for the period
from August 11, 2004 (commencement of operations) through
December 31, 2004, the related statements of income and
owners equity of Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. for
the period from January 1, 2004 through August 17,
2004 and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the
related consolidated and combined statement of cash flows of
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries and Inhale
201 Industrial Road, L.P. for the year ended
December 31, 2004, and the related statements of cash flows
of Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002. In connection with our audits
of the consolidated and combined financial statements, we have
also audited the accompanying financial statement
schedule III of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004. These consolidated and combined
financial statements are the responsibility of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc.s management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these consolidated and combined financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated and combined financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and
the financial position of Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P.
as of December 31, 2003, the consolidated results of
operations of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
period from August 11, 2004 through December 31, 2004,
the results of operations of Inhale 201 Industrial Road,
L.P. for the period from January 1, 2004 through
August 17, 2004 and the years ended December 31, 2003
and 2002, the consolidated and combined cash flows of BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc. and subsidiaries and Inhale
201 Industrial Road, L.P. for the year ended
December 31, 2004, and the cash flows of Inhale
201 Industrial Road, L.P. for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule III, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated and combined
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.
San Diego, California
March 30, 2005
F-19
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inhale 201 | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial | |
|
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
Road, L.P. | |
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Assets |
Rental property, net
|
|
$ |
489,136 |
|
|
$ |
468,488 |
|
|
$ |
47,025 |
|
Property under development
|
|
|
5,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
15,570 |
|
|
|
27,869 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
5,255 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued straight-line rents, net
|
|
|
4,224 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
2,427 |
|
Acquired above market leases, net
|
|
|
7,543 |
|
|
|
8,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred leasing costs, net
|
|
|
60,950 |
|
|
|
61,503 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
601,617 |
|
|
$ |
581,723 |
|
|
$ |
50,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders and Owners Equity |
Mortgage notes payable, net
|
|
$ |
101,594 |
|
|
$ |
102,236 |
|
|
$ |
34,208 |
|
Unsecured line of credit
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Dividends and distributions payable
|
|
|
9,262 |
|
|
|
9,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
9,466 |
|
|
|
7,529 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
Acquired lease obligations, net
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
13,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
159,258 |
|
|
|
137,639 |
|
|
|
37,597 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
22,486 |
|
|
|
22,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders and owners equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 31,432,558 and 31,386,333 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
435,010 |
|
|
|
434,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(4,410 |
) |
|
|
(4,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends in excess of earnings
|
|
|
(11,041 |
) |
|
|
(8,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Owners equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders and owners equity
|
|
|
419,873 |
|
|
|
421,817 |
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders and owners equity
|
|
$ |
601,617 |
|
|
$ |
581,723 |
|
|
$ |
50,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-20
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inhale 201 Industrial Road, L.P. | |
|
|
|
|
Inhale 201 | |
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Road, | |
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
| |
|
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
L.P. | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Trust, Inc | |
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
|
|
Period | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Period | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
August 11, | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
2004 through | |
|
through | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
August 17, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
14,214 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
19,432 |
|
|
$ |
3,339 |
|
|
$ |
6,275 |
|
|
$ |
5,869 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
24,471 |
|
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
28,654 |
|
|
|
3,714 |
|
|
|
7,019 |
|
|
|
6,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
6,395 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
11,619 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
16,924 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
22,602 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
4,811 |
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,411 |
) |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(1,180 |
) |
|
|
(1,760 |
) |
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
|
|
(3,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests
|
|
|
6,265 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
31,129,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,965,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
34,148,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,767,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-21
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND
STATEMENTS OF OWNERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Dividends in | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Common | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Owners | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Equity | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
The Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,538 |
|
|
$ |
12,538 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,029 |
) |
|
|
(2,029 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,169 |
|
|
|
12,169 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,044 |
) |
|
|
(2,044 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
|
12,459 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at August 11, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,245 |
|
|
|
12,245 |
|
The Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buyout of owners equity of Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,245 |
) |
|
|
(12,245 |
) |
|
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
31,050,000 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
429,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429,335 |
|
|
Issuance of unvested restricted common stock
|
|
|
336,333 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
(5,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,172 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
31,386,333 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
434,075 |
|
|
|
(4,182 |
) |
|
|
(8,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
421,817 |
|
|
Issuance of unvested restricted common stock (unaudited)
|
|
|
46,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted common stock (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
Dividends (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
Net income (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
31,432,558 |
|
|
$ |
314 |
|
|
$ |
435,010 |
|
|
$ |
(4,410 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,041 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
419,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-22
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
CONSOLIDATED AND COMBINED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inhale 201 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Road, L.P. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioMed Realty | |
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
Biomed Realty | |
|
Inhale 201 | |
|
Inhale 201 | |
|
|
Trust, Inc. | |
|
| |
|
and Industrial | |
|
Industrial | |
|
Industrial | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Road, L.P. | |
|
Road, L.P. | |
|
Road, L.P. | |
|
|
|
|
Three | |
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
(Predecessor) | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Months | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
5,783 |
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,660 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
8,453 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue reduction attributable to acquired above market leases
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue recognized related to acquired lease obligations
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted common stock
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of loan costs
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
Interest expense reduction for amortization of debt premium
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued straight-line rents
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
|
Deferred leasing costs
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5,751 |
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
13,959 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for improvements to rental property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
Purchases of interests in rental property and related intangible
assets
|
|
|
(25,409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459,264 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of interest in and additions to property under
development
|
|
|
(5,373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security deposits received from prior owners of rental property
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant improvement funds received from prior owners of rental
property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts of master lease payments (reduction to rental property)
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions received from unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds held in escrow for acquisitions (other assets)
|
|
|
(2,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of related party payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(32,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(456,680 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from initial public offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
465,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of loan costs
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,701 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit proceeds
|
|
|
19,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit repayments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on secured notes payable
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(762 |
) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
Proceeds from secured notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,300 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
Distributions to operating partnership unit holders
|
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(8,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,698 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to owners of Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
|
|
(2,044 |
) |
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
470,433 |
|
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(12,299 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
27,712 |
|
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
393 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
27,869 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
15,570 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
27,869 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
676 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
3,393 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured notes payable assumed (includes premium of $5,642)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historic cost basis of assets transferred from Predecessor
(including $2,189 of accrued straight-line rents as of
August 17, 2004)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating partnership units issued for interests in certain
contributed properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated partnership acquired by issuing
Operating Partnership units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions in excess of equity balance to owners of
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for dividends declared
|
|
|
8,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for distributions declared for operating partnership
unit holders
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-23
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Organization and Description of Business |
As used herein, the terms we, us,
our or the Company refer to BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation and any of our
subsidiaries, including BioMed Realty, L.P., a Maryland limited
partnership (our Operating Partnership), and 201
Industrial Road, L.P. (Industrial Road) (our
Predecessor). We operate as a fully integrated,
self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust
(REIT) focused on acquiring, developing, owning,
leasing and managing laboratory and office space for the life
science industry. The Companys tenants include
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, scientific research
institutions, government agencies and other entities involved in
the life science industry. The Companys primary
acquisition targets and current properties are located in
markets with well established reputations as centers for
scientific research, including San Diego,
San Francisco, Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York/
New Jersey and Boston.
The Company was incorporated in Maryland on April 30, 2004.
On August 11, 2004, the Company commenced operations after
completing its initial public offering (the
Offering) of 27,000,000 shares of its common
stock, par value $.01 per share. The Offering price was
$15.00 per share resulting in gross proceeds of
$405.0 million. On August 16, 2004, in connection with
the exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option,
the Company issued an additional 4,050,000 shares of common
stock and received gross proceeds of $60.8 million. The
aggregate proceeds to the Company, net of underwriting discounts
and commissions and Offering costs, were approximately
$429.3 million. In addition, simultaneously with the
Offering, the Company obtained a $100.0 million revolving
unsecured credit facility (Note 5), to finance acquisitions
and for other corporate purposes. The Company issued a stock
warrant in connection with the Offering to the lead underwriter
for the right to purchase 270,000 common shares at
$15.00 per share, which equals the estimated fair value at
the date of grant. The warrant vested immediately and became
exercisable six months after the Offering date. From inception
through August 11, 2004, neither the Company nor its
Operating Partnership had any operations.
From the completion of the Offering on August 11, 2004
through September 30, 2004, the Company, through the
Operating Partnership, completed the acquisition of the 13
properties previously described in the Companys initial
public offering prospectus. The Company acquired Industrial
Road, Science Center Drive, Bernardo Center Drive, Balboa
Avenue, Eisenhower Road and a general partnership interest in
McKellar Court from affiliates and others for an aggregate of
approximately 2.9 million limited partnership units in the
Operating Partnership (Units), aggregate cash
consideration of approximately $77.0 million using net
proceeds of the Offering and the assumption of
$14.0 million of debt (excluding $1.8 million of
premium). In addition, the Company acquired seven properties
from unaffiliated third parties: Landmark at Eastview, King of
Prussia, Elliott Avenue, Monte Villa Parkway, Bridgeview,
Bayshore Boulevard and Towne Centre Drive. The Company acquired
these properties for aggregate cash consideration of
approximately $323.2 million using net proceeds of the
Companys Offering and the assumption of $29.0 million
of debt (excluding $3.2 million of premium). The seller of
the Bridgeview property exercised its right to extend the
closing date on a portion of the property, consisting of one
building representing $16.1 million (or approximately 50%
of the purchase price), to March 2005 to facilitate a like-kind
exchange under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the Code).
Industrial Road is the largest of the properties contributed in
the Offering and therefore has been identified as the accounting
acquirer pursuant to paragraph 17 of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141). As
such, the historical financial statements presented herein for
Industrial Road were prepared on a stand-alone basis up to and
including the acquisition date, August 17, 2004. Upon
completion of the Offering, the interest in the Predecessor
acquired from affiliates was recorded at historic cost. The
acquisitions of the unaffiliated interests in the
F-24
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Predecessor and the interests in all of the other properties
have been accounted for as a purchase in accordance with
SFAS 141. McKellar Court is accounted for under the equity
method.
|
|
2. |
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, and partnerships and
limited liability companies it controls. All material
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The
Company consolidates entities the Company controls and records a
minority interest for the portions not owned by the Company.
Control is determined, where applicable, by the sufficiency of
equity invested and the rights of the equity holders, and by the
ownership of a majority of the voting interests, with
consideration given to the existence of approval or veto rights
granted to the minority shareholder. If the minority shareholder
holds substantive participation rights, it overcomes the
presumption of control by the majority voting interest holder.
In contrast, if the minority shareholder simply holds protective
rights (such as consent rights over certain actions), it does
not overcome the presumption of control by the majority voting
interest holder. With respect to the partnerships and limited
liability companies, the Company determines control through a
consideration of each partys financial interests in
profits and losses and the ability to participate in major
decisions such as the acquisition, sale or refinancing of
principal assets.
Investments in Rental Property
Investments in rental property are carried at depreciated cost.
Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
40 years |
Ground lease
|
|
Term of the related lease |
Tenant improvements
|
|
Shorter of the useful lives or the terms of the related leases |
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
3-5 years |
Acquired in-place leases
|
|
Non-cancelable term of the related lease |
Acquired management agreements
|
|
Non-cancelable term of the related agreement |
Purchase accounting was applied, on a pro-rata basis where
appropriate, to the assets and liabilities of real estate
entities in which we acquired an interest or a partial interest.
The fair value of tangible assets of an acquired property (which
includes land, buildings, and improvements) is determined by
valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the
as-if-vacant value is then allocated to land,
buildings and improvements based on managements
determination of the relative fair value of these assets. We
determine the as-if-vacant fair value using methods similar to
those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by us
in performing these analyses include an estimate of the carrying
costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market
conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating
carrying costs, we include real estate taxes, insurance and
other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental revenue
during the expected lease-up periods based on current market
demand.
In allocating fair value to the identified intangible assets and
liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and
below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present
value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks
associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between
(a) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the
in-place leases and (b) our estimate of the fair market
lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over
a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of
F-25
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
the leases. The capitalized above-market lease values are
amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining
non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized
below-market lease values (presented as acquired lease
obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) are
amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term
and any fixed rate renewal periods in the respective leases. If
a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination
of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease,
any unamortized balance of the related intangible will be
written off.
The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets consists
of acquired in-place leases and acquired management agreements.
The fair value allocated to acquired in-place leases consists of
a variety of components including, but not necessarily limited
to: (a) the value associated with avoiding the cost of
originating the acquired in-place leases (i.e. the market cost
to execute a lease, including leasing commissions and legal
fees, if any); (b) the value associated with lost revenue
related to tenant reimbursable operating costs estimated to be
incurred during the assumed lease-up period (i.e. real estate
taxes, insurance and other operating expenses); (c) the
value associated with lost rental revenue from existing leases
during the assumed lease-up period; and (d) the value
associated with avoided tenant improvement costs or other
inducements to secure a tenant lease. The fair value assigned to
the acquired management agreements are recorded at the present
value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks
associated with the management agreements acquired) of the
acquired management agreements with certain tenants of the
acquired properties. The values of in-place leases and
management agreements are amortized to expense over the
remaining non-cancelable period of the respective leases or
agreements. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated
expiration, all unamortized amounts related to that lease would
be written off.
The Company has a leasehold interest in the Landmark at Eastview
property through a 99-year ground lease. Following the
sellers completion of certain property subdivisions, the
ground lease will terminate and a fee simple interest in the
property will be transferred to the Company for no additional
consideration. Under the terms of the ground lease, the Company
has $1.25 million in escrow, which will be used by the
seller to complete certain improvements required in connection
with completing the property subdivisions. The
$1.25 million is included in other assets on the
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2004. There
are no additional amounts due from the Company under the terms
of the ground lease.
Costs related to acquisition, development, construction and
improvements to rental property are capitalized. Capitalized
costs associated with unsuccessful acquisitions are charged to
expense when an acquisition is abandoned.
Repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred
and significant replacements and betterments are capitalized.
Repairs and maintenance costs include all costs that do not
extend the useful life of an asset or increase its operating
efficiency. Significant replacement and betterments represent
costs that extend an assets useful life or increase its
operating efficiency.
F-26
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Rental property, net consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
70,285 |
|
|
$ |
68,755 |
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
Ground lease
|
|
|
14,210 |
|
|
|
14,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
409,686 |
|
|
|
388,502 |
|
|
|
37,588 |
|
Tenant improvements
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,901 |
|
|
|
471,757 |
|
|
|
49,588 |
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(5,765 |
) |
|
|
(3,269 |
) |
|
|
(2,563 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
489,136 |
|
|
$ |
468,488 |
|
|
$ |
47,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be
Disposed
The Company reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used
is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset
to future net cash flows, undiscounted and without interest,
expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or
fair value less costs to sell.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less. We maintain
our cash at insured financial institutions. The combined account
balances at each institution periodically exceed FDIC insurance
coverage, and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit
risk related to amounts in excess of FDIC limits. We believe
that the risk is not significant.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily consists of deposits for real estate
taxes, insurance and capital reserves as required by certain
loan agreements.
Statements of Cash Flows
The statements of cash flows of the Company and the Predecessor
have been combined for the year ended December 31, 2004 to
make them comparable to the same period in 2003 for the
Predecessor.
Deferred Leasing Costs
Leasing commissions and other direct costs associated with
obtaining new or renewal leases are recorded at cost and
amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the
respective leases. Deferred leasing costs also include the net
carrying value of acquired in-place leases and acquired
management agreements, which are discussed above in investments
in rental property.
F-27
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The balance at March 31, 2005 (unaudited) was
comprised as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Acquired in-place leases
|
|
$ |
60,078 |
|
|
$ |
(7,032 |
) |
|
$ |
53,046 |
|
Acquired management agreements
|
|
|
8,392 |
|
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
7,409 |
|
Deferred leasing commissions
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69,031 |
|
|
$ |
(8,081 |
) |
|
$ |
60,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The balance at December 31, 2004 was comprised as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Acquired in-place leases
|
|
$ |
57,663 |
|
|
$ |
(4,001 |
) |
|
$ |
53,662 |
|
Acquired management agreements
|
|
|
8,151 |
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
7,575 |
|
Deferred leasing commissions
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
66,175 |
|
|
$ |
(4,672 |
) |
|
$ |
61,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The balance at December 31, 2003 was comprised as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred leasing commissions
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
$ |
287 |
|
Deferred Loan Costs
Costs associated with obtaining long-term financing are
capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the terms of
the related loans using a method that approximates the
effective-interest method. The balance includes $162,000 and
$102,000 of accumulated amortization at December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
All leases are classified as operating leases and minimum rents
are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
related lease. The impact of the straight-line rent adjustment
increased revenue by $1,125,000, $648,000, and $758,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002,
respectively. Additionally, the impact of the amortization of
acquired above-market leases and acquired lease obligations
decreased revenue by $287,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The excess of rents recognized over
amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases are
included in accrued straight-line rents on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets and contractually due but unpaid
rents are included in accounts receivable.
Recoveries from tenants, consisting of amounts due from tenants
for real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance
costs are recognized as revenue in the period the expenses are
incurred. The reimbursements are recognized and presented in
accordance with EITF, 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a
Principal versus Net as an Agent
(EITF 99-19). EITF 99-19 requires that
these reimbursements be recorded gross, as the Company is
generally the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods
and services from third-party suppliers, has discretion in
selecting the supplier and bears the credit risk.
F-28
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Payments received under master lease agreements entered into
with the sellers of the Bayshore and King of Prussia properties
to lease space that was not producing rent at the time of the
acquisition are recorded as a reduction to buildings and
improvements rather than as rental income in accordance with
EITF 85-27, Recognition of Receipts from Made-Up Rental
Shortfalls. Receipts under the master lease agreements
totaled $1,327,000 for the period from August 11, 2004 to
December 31, 2004. The master lease at Bayshore will expire
in February 2006. The master lease at King of Prussia will
expire in June 2008 or sooner under the terms of the agreement
if the vacant space is leased by a new tenant.
Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases
are canceled and we have no continuing obligation to provide
services to such former tenants. A gain on early termination of
lease of $3.0 million (unaudited) for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 is included in other income on the
consolidated statements of income and was due to the early
termination of a portion of the Nektar lease at our Industrial
Road property. Accordingly, the related lease commissions and
other related intangible assets have been fully amortized.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of tenants to make required
rent payments. We also maintain an allowance for accrued
straight-line rents. The computation of this allowance is based
on the tenants payment history and current credit status.
Incentive Awards
The Company follows SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123) as
amended by SFAS No. 148. SFAS 123 requires that
compensation expense be recorded for the fair-value of
restricted stock granted to employees and non-employee
directors. The fair-value is recorded based on the market value
of the common stock on the grant date to deferred compensation
and is amortized to general and administrative expenses over the
respective vesting periods.
Equity Offering Costs
Underwriting commissions and offering costs are reflected as a
reduction to additional paid-in-capital.
Income Taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company intends
to elect to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through
860 of the Code. A REIT is generally not subject to federal
income tax on that portion of its taxable income that is
distributed to its stockholders, provided that at least 90% of
taxable income is distributed. REITs are subject to a number of
organizational and operational requirements. If the Company
fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will
be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable
alternative minimum tax) and, in most of the states, state
income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates.
The Company is subject to certain state and local taxes.
We have formed a taxable REIT subsidiary (a TRS). In
general, a TRS may perform non-customary services for tenants,
hold assets that we cannot hold directly and generally engage in
any real estate or non-real estate related business. A TRS is
subject to corporate federal income taxes on its taxable income
at regular corporate tax rates (except for the operation or
management of health care facilities or lodging facilities or
the providing of any person, under a franchise, license or
otherwise, rights to any brand name under which any lodging
facility or health care facility is operated). For the periods
F-29
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of income
there is no tax provision for the TRS as the TRS had no
substantial operations during 2004.
The Predecessor was a partnership. Under applicable federal and
state income tax rules, the allocated share of net income/loss
from partnerships is reportable in the income tax returns of the
partners and members. Accordingly, no income tax provision is
included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
for the period from January 1, 2004 through August 17,
2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.
Dividends and Distributions
Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of
dividends and distributions to stockholders, will differ from
income reported for financial reporting purposes due to the
difference for federal income tax purposes in the treatment of
revenue recognition, compensation expense, and in the estimated
useful lives used to compute depreciation. Total common
distributions were $0.4197 per common share, of which
$0.283673 is treated as ordinary income for federal income tax
purposes for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
remaining common distribution of $0.136027 will be reported for
federal income tax purposes in the year ending December 31,
2005.
Managements Estimates
Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and
assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities
and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reporting of revenue
and expenses during the reporting period to prepare these
financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The Company bases its estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities and reported amounts
of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Management considers those estimates and assumptions that are
most important to the portrayal of the Companys financial
condition and results of operations, in that they require
managements most subjective judgments, to form the basis
for the accounting policies used by the Company. These estimates
and assumptions of items such as market rents, time required to
lease vacant spaces, lease terms for incoming tenants and credit
worthiness of tenants in determining the as-if-vacant value,
in-place lease value and above and below market rents value are
utilized in allocating purchase price to tangible and identified
intangible assets upon acquisition of a property. These
accounting policies also include managements estimates of
useful lives in calculating depreciation expense on its
properties and the ultimate recoverability (or impairment) of
each property. If the useful lives of buildings and improvements
are different from 40 years, it could result in changes to
the future results of operations of the Company. Future adverse
changes in market conditions or poor operating results of our
properties could result in losses or an inability to recover the
carrying value of the properties that may not be reflected in
the properties current carrying value, thereby possibly
requiring an impairment charge in the future.
F-30
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation.
Unaudited Interim Financial Information
The financial statements as of March 31, 2005 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are unaudited.
In the opinion of management, such financial statements reflect
all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
respective interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal
recurring nature.
In connection with our Offering, we acquired interests in six
properties through our Operating Partnership that were
previously owned by limited partnerships and a limited liability
company in which certain officers of the Company or entities
affiliated with them owned interests, and private investors and
tenants who are not affiliated with them owned interests.
Persons and entities owning the interests in four of the limited
partnerships and the limited liability company, certain
officers, some of their spouses and parents, and other
individuals and entities not affiliated with us or our
management, contributed to us all of their interests in these
entities. In exchange for these interests, we issued an
aggregate of 2,870,564 limited partnership units in our
operating partnership and cash payments in the aggregate amount
of $20.5 million. Certain officers of the Company
(including some of their spouses) received an aggregate of
2,673,172 limited partnership units having a value of
$40.1 million based on the initial public offering price of
our common stock of $15.00 per share.
Minority interests on the consolidated balance sheet related to
the Units that are not owned by the Company, which at
December 31, 2004 amounted to 8.46% of total common stock
and Units outstanding. During the period from August 11,
2004 to December 31, 2004, the minority interest carrying
value fluctuated due to the timing of the underwriters
over-allotment option of 4,050,000 shares, which closed on
August 16, 2004, and the closing of certain acquisitions in
which Units were issued. In conjunction with the formation of
the Company, certain persons and entities contributing interests
in properties to the Operating Partnership received Units.
Limited partners who were issued Units in the formation
transactions have the right, commencing approximately one year
after the Offering, to require the Operating Partnership to
redeem part or all of their Units for cash based upon the fair
market value of an equivalent number of shares of the
Companys common stock at the time of redemption.
Alternatively, the Company may elect to acquire those Units in
exchange for shares of the Companys common stock on a
one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment in the event of stock
splits, stock dividends, issuance of stock rights, specified
extraordinary distributions and similar events. Minority
interests also include an 11% interest of a limited partner, in
the limited partnership that owns the King of Prussia property
and a 10% interest by a limited partner in the limited liability
company that owns the Waples property, which are consolidated
entities of the Company.
F-31
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
A summary of our outstanding consolidated secured indebtedness
as of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Fixed | |
|
Effective | |
|
|
|
Unamortized | |
|
Value at | |
|
Value at | |
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Principal | |
|
Premium | |
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
Rate | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Maturity Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Ardentech Court
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
$ |
4,807 |
|
|
$ |
591 |
|
|
$ |
5,398 |
|
|
$ |
5,440 |
|
|
|
July 1, 2012 |
|
Bayshore Boulevard
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
16,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,378 |
|
|
|
16,438 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
Bridgeview
|
|
|
8.07 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
11,798 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
13,578 |
|
|
|
13,681 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2011 |
|
Eisenhower Road
|
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
May 5, 2008 |
|
Elliott Avenue
|
|
|
7.38 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
|
|
16,881 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
17,898 |
|
|
|
18,107 |
|
|
|
November 24, 2007 |
|
Monte Villa Parkway
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,971 |
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
Science Center Drive
|
|
|
7.65 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
1,613 |
|
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
|
13,376 |
|
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
Towne Centre Drive
|
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
22,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,774 |
|
|
|
22,856 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,520 |
|
|
$ |
5,074 |
|
|
$ |
101,594 |
|
|
$ |
102,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding secured notes payable due to affiliates as of
December 31, 2003 was repaid on August 17, 2004.
Mortgage debt aggregating $77.0 million secured by the King
of Prussia property was repaid in August 2004 concurrent with
the purchase of the property.
Premiums were recorded upon assumption of the notes at the time
of acquisition to account for above-market interest rates.
Amortization of these premiums is recorded as a reduction to
interest expense over the remaining term of the respective note.
Principal payments due for our consolidated indebtedness were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,456 |
|
|
$ |
1,834 |
|
2006
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
2007
|
|
|
37,112 |
|
|
|
17,613 |
|
2008
|
|
|
3,732 |
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
69,987 |
|
|
|
69,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
116,020 |
|
|
$ |
96,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On August 11, 2004, the Company entered into a
$100.0 million revolving unsecured loan agreement, which
bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.20%, or higher depending on the
leverage ratio of the Company at the time of the draw, or a
reference rate, and expires on August 11, 2007. The
Company, at its sole discretion, may extend the maturity date to
August 11, 2008 after satisfying certain conditions and
paying an extension fee totaling 0.20% of the then outstanding
commitment. The Company may increase the amount of the
commitment up to $200.0 million upon satisfying certain
conditions and agreement of the lender. The credit facility
requires payment of a quarterly unused commitment fee ranging
from 0.15% to
F-32
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
0.25% depending on the total unused commitment and an annual
administrative fee equal to $10,000 times the number of banks
participating in the facility. As of December 31, 2004, the
Company had no borrowings outstanding on the credit facility.
However, the amount available at December 31, 2004 was
$94.0 million due to the issuance of a letter of credit by
the lender related to our Bridgeview property.
The terms of the credit facility include certain restrictions
and covenants, which limit, among other things, the payment of
dividends, and the incurrence of additional indebtedness and
liens. The terms also require compliance with financial ratios
relating to the minimum amounts of net worth, fixed charge
coverage, unsecured interest expense coverage, leverage ratio,
cash flow coverage, the maximum amount of unsecured, secured and
recourse indebtedness, and certain investment limitations. The
dividend restriction referred to above provides that, except to
enable the Company to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal
income tax purposes, the Company will not during any four
consecutive quarters make distributions with respect to common
stock or other equity interests in an aggregate amount in excess
of 95% of funds from operations, as defined, for such period,
subject to other adjustments. Management believes that it was in
compliance with the covenants as of December 31, 2004 and
March 31, 2005.
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated based on the
weighted number of shares of our common stock outstanding during
the period. The effect of the outstanding Units, vesting of
unvested restricted stock that has been granted and the assumed
exercise of the stock warrant, using the treasury method, were
dilutive and included in the calculation of diluted
weighted-average shares for the period from August 11, 2004
through December 31, 2004.
The following table sets forth information related to the
computations of basic and diluted EPS in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period | |
|
|
For the Three | |
|
August 11, | |
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
2004 through | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Net income attributable to common shares
|
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
Operating partnership unit share in earnings of minority
interest(1)
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income attributable to common shares
|
|
$ |
6,374 |
|
|
$ |
5,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
31,129,613 |
|
|
|
30,965,178 |
|
|
Incremental shares from assumed conversion/exercise:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock warrant
|
|
|
75,047 |
|
|
|
51,681 |
|
|
|
Vesting of restricted stock
|
|
|
73,596 |
|
|
|
90,173 |
|
|
|
Operating Partnership Units
|
|
|
2,870,564 |
|
|
|
2,660,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
34,148,820 |
|
|
|
33,767,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Does not include minority interest for the limited
partners interest in the King of Prussia property of
$(145,000) and $(109,000), respectively. |
F-33
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
7. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
SFAS No. 107, Disclosure about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, requires us to disclose fair value
information about all financial instruments, whether or not
recognized in the balance sheets, for which it is practicable to
estimate fair value. Our disclosures of estimated fair value of
financial instruments at March 31, 2005, December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively, were determined using available
market information and appropriate valuation methods.
Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and
develop estimated fair value. The use of different market
assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on
the estimated fair value amounts.
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, accounts receivable, accrued straight-line rents, accounts
payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the
short-term nature of these instruments.
We calculate the fair value of our secured notes payable based
on a currently available market rate assuming the loans are
outstanding through maturity and considering the collateral. In
determining the current market rate for fixed rate debt, a
market spread is added to the quoted yields on federal
government treasury securities with similar maturity dates to
debt.
As of December 31, 2003, the fair value of the secured
notes payable and due to affiliates approximated the carrying
value.
At December 31, 2004, the aggregate fair value of our
secured notes payable was estimated to be $101.2 million
compared to the net carrying value of $102.2 million. At
March 31, 2005, the aggregate fair value of our secured
notes payable was estimated to be $99.0 million compared to
the net carrying value of $101.6 million (including
$5.1 million of unamortized premium). As of
December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005(unaudited), the
fair value of the debt of our investment in unconsolidated
partnership approximated the carrying value.
The Company has adopted the BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and BioMed
Realty, L.P. 2004 Incentive Award Plan (the Plan).
The Plan provides for the grant to directors, employees and
consultants of the Company, and the Operating Partnership (and
their respective subsidiaries) of stock options, restricted
stock, stock appreciation rights, dividend equivalents, and
other incentive awards. The Company has reserved
2,500,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to
the Plan, subject to adjustments as set forth in the Plan. Upon
consummation of the Offering, the Company granted
8,000 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate value of
$120,000 to four independent directors of the Board, which vest
one year from the date of grant. After the Offering, the Company
also granted 328,333 shares of restricted stock with an
aggregate value of $4.9 million to certain officers and key
employees pursuant to the Plan. The restricted shares generally
vest in three equal installments on January 1, 2005,
January 1, 2006 and January 1, 2007. Participants are
entitled to cash dividends and may vote such awarded shares, but
the sale or transfer of such shares is limited during the
restricted period.
In accordance with SFAS 123, the Company recorded deferred
compensation of approximately $5.1 million during 2004 for
the grants described above based upon the market value for these
shares on the dates of the award, and the related compensation
charges are being amortized to expense on a straight-line basis
over the respective service periods. During the period from
August 11, 2004 through December 31, 2004, $872,000 of
stock-based compensation expense was recognized in general and
administrative expense.
F-34
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company
granted 46,225 shares of restricted stock under the BioMed
Realty Trust, Inc. and BioMed Realty, L.P. 2004 Incentive Award
Plan. As a result, an additional $935,000 was added to deferred
compensation. For the three months ended March 31, 2005,
$707,000 of stock-based compensation expense was recognized in
general and administrative expense.
|
|
9. |
Investment in Unconsolidated Partnership |
Investment in unconsolidated partnership is accounted for using
the equity method whereby our investment is recorded at cost and
the investment account is adjusted for our share of the
entitys income or loss and for distributions and
contributions. As of December 31, 2004, we had an
investment in McKellar Court, L.P. (McKellar Court).
The acquisition of the investment in McKellar Court closed on
September 30, 2004. McKellar Court is a variable interest
entity as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities;
however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The limited
partner is also the only tenant in the property and will bear a
disproportionate amount of any losses. The Company, as the
general partner, will receive 21% of the operating cash flows
and 75% of the gains upon sale of the property. We account for
our general partner interest using the equity method.
Significant accounting policies used by the unconsolidated
partnership that owns this property are similar to those used by
the Company. The assets and liabilities of McKellar Court were
$23.1 million and $17.1 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2004.
|
|
10. |
Financial Interests Subject to Put and Call Options |
The limited partner in the King of Prussia limited partnership
has a put option that would require the Company to purchase the
limited partners interest in the property beginning
August 21, 2007 through November 11, 2007 for
$1.8 million less any distributions paid to the limited
partner. If the put option is not exercised, then the Company
has a call option beginning in May 11, 2008 through
August 11, 2008 to purchase the limited partners
interest for $1.9 million less any distributions paid to
the limited partner. If the Company does not exercise the
option, then the limited partnership will continue in existence
under the terms of the partnership agreement. As of
December 31, 2004, the fair value of the put and call
options was $386,000 and $100,000, respectively, which is
recorded as a net accrued liability included in accounts payable
and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. In
addition, the Company has recorded net change in fair value of
the put and call options since the date of acquisition of
$20,000 as a charge to income on the consolidated statements of
income.
The Companys segments are based on its method of internal
reporting which classifies its operations by geographic area.
The Companys segments by geographic area are
San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle, New York and New
Jersey, Pennsylvania and Maryland. The rental operations
expenses at the Corporate and Other segment consists
primarily of the corporate level management of the properties.
The principal financial measure of the performance of a segment
used by the Company is Net Operating Income. Net Operating
Income is not a measure of operating results or cash flows from
operating activities as measured by GAAP, and it is not
indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not
be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of
liquidity. All companies may not calculate Net Operating Income
in the same manner. The Company considers Net Operating Income
to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because
it helps both investors and management to
F-35
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
understand the core operations of the Companys properties.
Net Operating Income is derived by deducting rental operations
and real estate tax expenses from rental revenues and tenant
recoveries.
The Predecessor operated in one geographic area
San Francisco.
Information by geographic area as of and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands)(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York | |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
San | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
|
|
Francisco | |
|
San Diego | |
|
Seattle | |
|
New Jersey | |
|
Pennsylvania | |
|
Maryland | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Rental revenues and tenant recoveries
|
|
$ |
3,547 |
|
|
$ |
3,728 |
|
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
7,887 |
|
|
$ |
3,053 |
|
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,468 |
|
|
% of total revenues
|
|
|
16.5 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Rental operations and real estate tax expenses
|
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
4,778 |
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
8,183 |
|
|
% of total rental operations expenses
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
58.4 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Net operating income
|
|
$ |
3,013 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
|
$ |
3,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,444 |
|
|
$ |
939 |
|
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
13,285 |
|
|
% of total net operating income
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity in net income of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
% of total equity income of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Gain on early termination of lease
|
|
$ |
3,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,003 |
|
|
% of total gain on early termination of lease
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Interest and other income
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
% of total interest income
|
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
(1,335 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,449 |
) |
|
$ |
(796 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,539 |
) |
|
$ |
(896 |
) |
|
$ |
(176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,191 |
) |
|
% of total depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(21.6 |
)% |
|
|
(23.4 |
)% |
|
|
(12.8 |
)% |
|
|
(24.8 |
)% |
|
|
(14.5 |
)% |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2,550 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,550 |
) |
|
% of total general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
(422 |
) |
|
$ |
(411 |
) |
|
$ |
(336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(215 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,411 |
) |
|
% of total interest expense
|
|
|
(29.9 |
)% |
|
|
(29.1 |
)% |
|
|
(23.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.3 |
)% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(538 |
) |
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
% of total minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125.4 |
)% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Net income
|
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
|
$ |
1,193 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
$ |
1,571 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
$ |
(3,426 |
) |
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
|
% of total net income
|
|
|
73.5 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
(58.7 |
)% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Investment in unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
153,670 |
|
|
$ |
136,749 |
|
|
$ |
70,700 |
|
|
$ |
109,558 |
|
|
$ |
93,088 |
|
|
$ |
32,409 |
|
|
$ |
5,443 |
|
|
$ |
601,617 |
|
F-36
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Information by geographic area as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate | |
|
|
|
|
San | |
|
|
|
|
|
New York/ | |
|
|
|
|
|
and | |
|
|
|
|
Francisco | |
|
San Diego | |
|
Seattle | |
|
New Jersey | |
|
Pennsylvania | |
|
Maryland | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
5,165 |
|
|
$ |
4,621 |
|
|
$ |
2,975 |
|
|
$ |
11,167 |
|
|
$ |
4,565 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,654 |
|
|
% of total revenues
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Rental operations expenses
|
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
421 |
|
|
$ |
7,194 |
|
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
11,619 |
|
|
% of total rental operations expenses
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
61.9 |
% |
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Net operating income
|
|
$ |
4,433 |
|
|
$ |
3,801 |
|
|
$ |
2,554 |
|
|
$ |
3,973 |
|
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
$ |
17,035 |
|
|
% of total net operating income
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
1,326 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,193 |
|
|
$ |
2,279 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,853 |
|
|
% of total depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,130 |
|
|
$ |
3,130 |
|
|
% of total general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Equity in net loss of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
% of total equity loss of unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
% of total interest income
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.4 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
(269 |
) |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
|
$ |
(301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(367 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,180 |
) |
|
% of total interest expense
|
|
|
(22.8 |
)% |
|
|
(16.9 |
)% |
|
|
(25.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1 |
)% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(414 |
) |
|
$ |
(269 |
) |
|
% of total minority interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
Net income
|
|
$ |
2,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,917 |
|
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,710 |
|
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
(4,000 |
) |
|
$ |
4,782 |
|
|
% of total net income
|
|
|
59.4 |
% |
|
|
40.1 |
% |
|
|
22.3 |
% |
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
(83.6 |
)% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Improvements to rental property
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
131,852 |
|
|
$ |
129,908 |
|
|
$ |
70,630 |
|
|
$ |
101,794 |
|
|
$ |
93,358 |
|
|
$ |
31,833 |
|
|
$ |
22,348 |
|
|
$ |
581,723 |
|
F-37
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
12. |
Property Acquisitions |
In addition to the property acquisitions described above in
Note 1, the Company acquired interests in properties during
the fourth quarter of 2004 and first quarter of 2005 (unaudited)
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase | |
|
Debt | |
|
|
|
|
Price | |
|
Assumed | |
|
Acquisition Date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
San Diego Science Center
|
|
$ |
29,750 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
October 21, 2004 |
|
Ardentech Court San Francisco
|
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
4,800 |
(1) |
|
|
November 18, 2004 |
|
Beckley Street Maryland
|
|
|
15,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 17, 2004 |
|
Tributary Street Maryland
|
|
|
10,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 17, 2004 |
|
Waples San Diego (unaudited)
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2005 |
|
Bridgeview San Francisco (unaudited)
|
|
|
16,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
Graphics Drive New Jersey (unaudited)
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 17, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
94,650 |
|
|
$ |
4,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes $622,000 of debt premium. |
Total future minimum lease receipts under noncancelable
operating tenant leases in effect at December 31, 2004 were
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
54,038 |
|
2006
|
|
|
52,512 |
|
2007
|
|
|
49,307 |
|
2008
|
|
|
37,588 |
|
2009
|
|
|
36,491 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
135,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
365,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
The geographic concentration of future minimum lease receipts
under noncancelable operating tenant leases to be received at
December 31, 2004 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
$ |
110,670 |
|
San Diego
|
|
|
76,324 |
|
Seattle
|
|
|
20,892 |
|
New York/New Jersey
|
|
|
51,276 |
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
57,885 |
|
Maryland
|
|
|
48,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
365,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
14. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
Concentration of Credit Risk
Life science entities comprise the vast majority of the
Companys tenant base. Because of the dependence on a
single industry, adverse conditions affecting that industry will
more adversely affect our business. One tenant comprised 10.7%
or $6.3 million of annualized revenues at December 31,
2004. The inability of this tenant to make lease payments could
materially adversely affect our business. This tenant is located
at our King of Prussia property located in Pennsylvania.
We generally do not require collateral or other security from
our tenants, other than security deposits or letters of credit.
Capital Commitments
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately
$1.9 million outstanding in capital commitments related to
tenants improvements, renovation costs and general
property-related capital expenditures.
Insurance
The Company carries insurance coverage on its properties of
types and in amounts that it believes are in line with coverage
customarily obtained by owners of similar properties. However,
certain types of losses (such as from earthquakes and floods)
may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable.
Further, certain of the properties are located in areas that are
subject to earthquake activity and floods. Should a property
sustain damage as a result of an earthquake or flood, the
Company may incur losses due to insurance deductibles,
co-payments on insured losses or uninsured losses. Should an
uninsured loss occur, the Company could lose some or all of its
capital investment, cash flow and anticipated profits related to
one or more properties.
Environmental Matters
The Company follows a policy of monitoring its properties for
the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The Company is
not aware of any environmental liability with respect to the
properties that would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business, assets or results of operations. There
can be no assurance that such a material environmental liability
does not exist. The existence of any such material environmental
liability could have an adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and cash flow. The Company carries
environmental remediation insurance for its properties. This
insurance, subject to certain exclusions and deductibles, covers
the cost to remediate environmental damage caused by future
spills or the historic presence of previously undiscovered
hazardous substances.
Tax Indemnification Agreements and Minimum Debt
Requirements
As a result of the contribution of properties to the Operating
Partnership, the Company has indemnified the contributors of the
properties against adverse tax consequences if it directly or
indirectly sells, exchanges or otherwise disposes of the
properties in a taxable transaction before the tenth anniversary
of the completion of the Offering. The Company also has agreed
to use its reasonable best efforts to maintain at least
$8.0 million of debt, some of which must be property
specific, for a period of ten years following the date of the
Offering to enable certain contributors to guarantee the debt in
order to defer potential taxable gain they may incur if the
Operating Partnership repays the existing debt.
F-39
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
15. |
Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R replaces SFAS 123. SFAS 123R requires
the compensation cost relating to share-based payment
transactions be recognized in financial statements and be
measured based on the fair value of the equity instrument
issued. SFAS 123R is effective in fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, the
Companys equity issuances for compensation have consisted
entirely of restricted stock grants to directors and employees.
The Company does not believe that the treatment of its
restricted stock grants under SFAS 123R differs from the
treatment under SFAS 123. As a result, the Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 123R to have a material impact
on the Companys results of operations, financial position,
or liquidity.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchange of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion
No. 29 (SFAS 153). The amendments made
by SFAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of
nonmonetary assets should be measured on the fair value of
assets exchanged. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception for
nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces
it with a broader exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets
that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 is
effective for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect
the adoption of SFAS 153 to have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations, financial position, or
liquidity.
On January 10, 2005, the Company appointed an independent
director, M. Faye Wilson, to its board of directors and
granted her 2,000 shares of restricted stock with an
aggregate value of $42,000, which vest one year from the date of
grant. During the first quarter of 2005, the Company also
granted 44,225 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate
value of $893,000 to officers and employees pursuant to the Plan.
On March 1, 2005, the Company invested approximately
$5.1 million in a majority owned joint venture that
purchased a building located at 9535 Waples in San Diego.
The Company anticipates expanding and improving the building to
reposition it as laboratory space. The Company has entered into
an agreement with its joint venture partner, who will be
responsible for construction, leasing and management.
On March 16, 2005, the Company acquired the third building
on our Bridgeview property in Hayward, California for
approximately $16.2 million. The purchase price was funded
through the Companys revolving credit facility.
On March 17, 2005, the Company acquired a building located
at 7 Graphics Drive in Ewing, New Jersey for approximately
$7.7 million. The purchase price was funded through the
Companys revolving credit facility and cash on hand.
On March 14, 2005, the Company declared its first quarter
2005 dividend in the amount of $0.27 per common share and
operating partnership unit. The dividend was paid on
April 15, 2005 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on March 31, 2005. The dividend is equivalent to
an annualized dividend of $1.08 per common share and unit.
|
|
17. |
Recent Developments (Unaudited) |
At March 31, 2005, we owned or had interests in 19
properties, located in San Diego, San Francisco,
Seattle, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey,
consisting of 36 buildings with approximately
F-40
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
2.8 million rentable square feet of laboratory and office
space. We also owned undeveloped land that we estimate can
support up to 548,000 rentable square feet of laboratory
and office space.
On April 5, 2005, the Company, through the Operating
Partnership, completed the acquisition of Fresh Pond Research
Park located in Cambridge, Massachusetts for cash consideration
of approximately $20.7 million. The purchase price was
funded with borrowings under our then existing
$100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility.
On April 5, 2005, the Company, through the Operating
Partnership, completed the acquisition of a property on Coolidge
Avenue located in the Boston area in Watertown, Massachusetts
for cash consideration of approximately $10.8 million. The
purchase price was funded with borrowings under our then
existing $100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility.
On April 5, 2005, the Company, through the Operating
Partnership, completed the acquisition of a property located on
Phoenixville Pike in Malvern, Pennsylvania for cash
consideration of approximately $13.0 million. The purchase
price was funded with borrowings under our then existing
$100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and cash
on hand.
On April 19, 2005, the Company entered into a lease
amendment with Centocor, Inc., a subsidiary of
Johnson & Johnson. Under the amendment, Centocor has
agreed to lease an additional 79,667 rentable square feet
at the Companys King of Prussia property located in
Radnor, Pennsylvania from May 1, 2005 through
March 31, 2010. The new lease replaces the existing portion
of the master lease with an affiliate of The Rubenstein Company,
the original seller of the property, with respect to this space.
Annualized base rent of approximately $1.3 million and
certain tenant reimbursements received under the new lease will
correspondingly reduce the rent received under the master lease.
On April 21, 2005, the Company, through the Operating
Partnership, completed the acquisition of a property located on
Nancy Ridge Drive in San Diego for cash consideration of
approximately $5.8 million and the assumption of
approximately $7.0 million in debt. The cash portion of the
purchase price was funded with borrowings under our then
existing $100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility.
On May 31, 2005, the Company acquired a portfolio (the Lyme
Portfolio) of seven properties and one parking structure in
Cambridge, Massachusetts and an additional property in Lebanon,
New Hampshire for a total purchase price of approximately
$531.0 million, including estimated closing costs. The
purchase price was paid in cash and through the assumption of
approximately $131.2 million of indebtedness. In order to
finance the acquisition and provide additional working capital,
the Company secured a commitment from KeyBank National
Association, under which the Company can borrow up to
$600.0 million under three credit facilities, including a
three-year, senior unsecured revolving credit facility of
$250.0 million, a three-year, senior unsecured term loan
facility of $100.0 million, and a five-year, secured term
loan facility of $250.0 million. The new
$250.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility,
which contains an accordion option up to $400.0 million,
replaced the Companys existing $100.0 million
unsecured revolving credit facility.
F-41
BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. AND
INHALE 201 INDUSTRIAL ROAD, L.P. (PREDECESSOR)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
18. |
Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited) |
The tables below reflect the Companys and the
Predecessors selected quarterly information for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per
share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.(1) | |
|
Predecessor(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
August 11 | |
|
July 1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
August 17, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
19,670 |
|
|
$ |
8,984 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
|
$ |
1,712 |
|
Income/(loss) before minority interests
|
|
$ |
3,146 |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
$ |
(261 |
) |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
Minority interests
|
|
$ |
(191 |
) |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
$ |
2,955 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
(261 |
) |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
Net income per share basic
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net income per share diluted
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Quarter Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Predecessor(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
1,756 |
|
|
$ |
1,755 |
|
|
$ |
1,760 |
|
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
564 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
594 |
|
Net income per share basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company commenced operations on August 11, 2004, after
completing the Offering. |
|
(2) |
Represents results of the Predecessor prior to completion of the
Offering and acquisition of the Predecessor on August 17,
2004. |
F-42
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial Cost | |
|
|
|
Gross amount carried at December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Costs | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings | |
|
Capitalized | |
|
|
|
Buildings | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Built/ | |
|
Date | |
|
|
|
|
|
Ground | |
|
and | |
|
Subsequent | |
|
|
|
Ground | |
|
and | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Property |
|
Market | |
|
Renovated | |
|
Acquired | |
|
Encumbrances | |
|
Land | |
|
Lease | |
|
Improvements | |
|
to Acquisition | |
|
Land | |
|
Lease | |
|
Improvements | |
|
Total | |
|
Depreciation | |
|
Net | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) | |
|
(3) | |
|
|
Ardentech Court
|
|
|
San Francisco |
|
|
|
1997/2001 |
|
|
|
11/18/04 |
|
|
$ |
4,828 |
|
|
$ |
2,742 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,372 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,742 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,372 |
|
|
$ |
8,114 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
8,097 |
|
Balboa Avenue
|
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
|
1968/2000 |
|
|
|
8/13/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,493 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,523 |
|
|
|
10,839 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
10,750 |
|
Bayshore Boulevard
|
|
|
San Francisco |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
8/17/04 |
|
|
|
16,438 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,131 |
|
|
|
26,798 |
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
26,581 |
|
Beckley Street
|
|
|
Maryland |
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
|
12/17/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,572 |
|
|
|
19,052 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
19,034 |
|
Bernardo Center Drive
|
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
|
1974/1992 |
|
|
|
8/13/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,714 |
|
|
|
16,294 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
16,165 |
|
Bridgeview
|
|
|
San Francisco |
|
|
|
1977/1998 |
|
|
|
9/10/04 |
|
|
|
11,825 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,716 |
|
|
|
16,031 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
15,924 |
|
Eisenhower Road
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
1973/2000 |
|
|
|
8/13/04 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
3,006 |
|
Elliott Avenue
|
|
|
Seattle |
|
|
|
1925/2004 |
|
|
|
8/24/04 |
|
|
|
16,996 |
|
|
|
10,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,906 |
|
|
|
49,030 |
|
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
48,665 |
|
Industrial Road
|
|
|
San Francisco |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
8/17/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,718 |
|
|
|
53,718 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
53,327 |
|
King of Prussia
|
|
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
1954/2004 |
|
|
|
8/11/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,231 |
|
|
|
81,044 |
|
|
|
(638 |
) |
|
|
80,406 |
|
Landmark at Eastview
|
|
New York/New Jersey |
|
|
1958/1999 |
|
|
|
8/12/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,210 |
|
|
|
61,996 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,217 |
|
|
|
62,249 |
|
|
|
76,466 |
|
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
75,831 |
|
Monte Villa Parkway
|
|
|
Seattle |
|
|
|
1996/2002 |
|
|
|
8/17/04 |
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,711 |
|
|
|
11,731 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
11,631 |
|
San Diego Science Center
|
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
|
1973/2002 |
|
|
|
10/21/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,874 |
|
|
|
25,746 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
25,632 |
|
Science Center Drive
|
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
|
1995 |
|
|
|
9/24/04 |
|
|
|
11,699 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,365 |
|
|
|
18,995 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
18,876 |
|
Towne Centre Drive
|
|
|
San Diego |
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
8/12/04 |
|
|
|
22,856 |
|
|
|
10,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,504 |
|
|
|
42,224 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
41,929 |
|
Tributary Street
|
|
|
Maryland |
|
|
|
1983/1998 |
|
|
|
12/17/04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,585 |
|
|
|
12,645 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
12,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,901 |
|
|
$ |
68,755 |
|
|
$ |
14,210 |
|
|
$ |
388,502 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
68,755 |
|
|
$ |
14,217 |
|
|
$ |
388,785 |
|
|
$ |
471,757 |
|
|
$ |
(3,269 |
) |
|
$ |
468,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes unamortized debt premium of $5,335. |
|
(2) |
The aggregate gross cost of the Companys rental property
for federal income tax purposes approximated $512,459 as of
December 31, 2004 (unaudited). |
|
(3) |
Depreciation of the ground lease and building and improvements
are recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful
lives ranging from the life of the lease to 40 years. |
See accompanying report of independent registered public
accounting firm.
F-43
SCHEDULE III REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED
DEPRECIATION
As of December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
A summary of activity of rental property and accumulated
depreciation is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioMed | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realty | |
|
|
|
|
Trust, Inc.(1) | |
|
Predecessor(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
August 11 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
|
|
|
thru | |
|
thru | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
August 17, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Rental Property:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period/year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
49,588 |
|
|
$ |
49,483 |
|
|
$ |
49,324 |
|
Property acquisitions
|
|
|
471,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period/year
|
|
$ |
471,757 |
|
|
$ |
49,588 |
|
|
$ |
49,588 |
|
|
$ |
49,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period/year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,563 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,630 |
) |
|
$ |
(697 |
) |
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
(3,269 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
|
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period/year
|
|
$ |
(3,269 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,149 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,563 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. commenced operations on
August 11, 2004 after completion of our Offering.
Industrial Road is the largest of the properties acquired in the
Offering and therefore has been identified as the accounting
acquirer, or Predecessor, pursuant to paragraph 17 of
SFAS 141. As such, the information presented herein for our
Predecessor were prepared on a stand-alone basis up to and
including the acquisition date, August 17, 2004. Upon
completion of the Offering, the interest in the Predecessor
acquired from affiliates was recorded at historic cost. The
acquisitions of the unaffiliated interests in the Predecessor
and the interests in all of the other properties have been
accounted for as a purchase in accordance with SFAS 141. |
See accompanying report of independent registered public
accounting firm.
F-44
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying combined statement of revenues
and certain expenses of the Lyme Portfolio (the Portfolio) for
the year ended December 31, 2004. This statement is the
responsibility of the management of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this statement
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Portfolios internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The accompanying combined statement of revenues and certain
expenses were prepared for the purpose of complying with the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
as described in note 1 to the combined statement of
revenues and certain expenses. It is not intended to be a
complete presentation of the Lyme Portfolios revenues and
expenses.
In our opinion, the statement referred to above presents fairly,
in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses, as
described in note 1, of the Lyme Portfolio for the year
ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
San Diego, California
June 3, 2005
F-45
LYME PORTFOLIO
COMBINED STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
11,273 |
|
|
$ |
44,123 |
|
|
Tenant recoveries
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
9,198 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
14,731 |
|
|
|
54,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental operations
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
5,344 |
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certain expenses
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
10,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
11,422 |
|
|
|
44,586 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,203 |
) |
|
|
(8,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of certain expenses
|
|
$ |
9,219 |
|
|
$ |
35,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to statements of revenues and certain
expenses.
F-46
LYME PORTFOLIO
NOTES TO COMBINED STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN
EXPENSES
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Tabular amounts in thousands)
|
|
(1) |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying combined statements of revenues and certain
expenses relate to the operations of a portfolio of seven life
science properties and one parking structure in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, and an additional property in Lebanon, New
Hampshire (collectively, the Portfolio). The eight
properties are leased to 6 tenants. Four of the properties
tenants lease parking spaces in the parking structure.
The Portfolio was owned by the Lyme Timber Company (Lyme) and
certain of its affiliates. On April 15, 2005, BioMed Realty
Trust, Inc., (the Company) through its operating partnership
subsidiary, BioMed Realty, L.P., (the Operating Partnership)
entered into a definitive purchase and sale agreement with Lyme
to purchase the Properties for approximately $524.0 million
plus closing costs. The Operating Partnership completed the
transaction on May 31, 2005.
The accompanying combined statements of revenues and certain
expenses have been prepared for the purpose of complying with
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and, accordingly, are not representative of the
actual results of operations of the Portfolio for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) or for the
year ended December 31, 2004 due to the exclusion of the
following revenues and expenses, which may not be comparable to
the proposed future operations of the Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
Other costs not directly related to the proposed future
operations of the Portfolio |
Prior to the acquisition, the Portfolio was partially managed by
third-party management companies. Following the acquisition, the
Portfolio will be managed by third-party managers under new
management contracts. In accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the third
party management fee revenues and expenses are included in the
statements of revenues and certain expenses.
|
|
(2) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices |
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the respective leases.
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting and disclosure of revenues and certain
expenses during the reporting periods to prepare the combined
statements of revenues and certain expenses in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
(c) |
Unaudited Interim Combined Statement |
The combined statement of revenues and certain expenses for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 is unaudited. In the
opinion of management, the statement reflects all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim
period. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
The Portfolio leases laboratory and office space under various
lease agreements with their tenants. All leases are accounted
for as operating leases. The leases include provisions under
which the properties are
F-47
LYME PROPERTIES
NOTES TO COMBINED STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN
EXPENSES (Continued)
reimbursed for common area expenses, real estate taxes and
insurance. Revenue related to these reimbursed costs is
recognized in the period the applicable costs are incurred and
billed to tenants pursuant to the lease agreements. Certain
leases contain renewal options at various times and rental rates.
Minimum rents to be received from tenants under operating
leases, which terms range from 4 to 13 years, in effect at
December 31, 2004, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
45,067 |
|
2006
|
|
|
42,692 |
|
2007
|
|
|
42,692 |
|
2008
|
|
|
42,692 |
|
2009
|
|
|
41,197 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
288,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
502,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses include only those costs expected to be
comparable to the proposed future operations of the Portfolio.
Repairs and maintenance expense are charged to operations as
incurred. Costs such as depreciation, amortization, management
fees, interest expense related to mortgage debt not assumed and
professional fees are excluded from the statements of revenues
and certain expenses.
In connection with the acquisition of the Portfolio, the
Operating Partnership assumed three separate mortgage notes
amounting to $126.4 million as of December 31, 2004.
Each mortgage note is secured by one of the properties in the
Portfolio. The mortgages bear interest at fixed rates ranging
from 6.38% to 7.34%. Each mortgage requires monthly payments of
principal and interest and mature on various dates through
October 1, 2018.
Minimum annual principal payments at December 31, 2004
under the terms of the mortgage notes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
2,898 |
|
2006
|
|
|
3,104 |
|
2007
|
|
|
3,324 |
|
2008
|
|
|
20,053 |
|
2009
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
94,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Operating Partnership will assume one
construction loan amounting to $5.4 million as of
December 31, 2004. Prior to the Operating
Partnerships acquisition of the Portfolio, the
construction loan was replaced by a $6.0 million mortgage
bearing interest at a fixed rate of 5.50% which matures on
January 1, 2025.
|
|
(5) |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, two tenants accounted
for approximately 52.8% and 34.4% of revenues. The other four
tenants accounted for approximately 12.8% of revenues.
F-48
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and
certain expenses of Bridgeview II (the Property) for the year
ended December 31, 2004. This statement is the
responsibility of the management of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this statement
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Propertys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was
prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as
described in note 1 to the statement of revenues and
certain expenses. It is not intended to be a complete
presentation of Bridgeview IIs revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the statement referred to above presents fairly,
in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses, as
described in note 1, of Bridgeview II for the year ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
San Diego, California
June 3, 2005
F-49
BRIDGEVIEW II
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
through | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 15, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant reimbursements
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certain expenses
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of certain expenses
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
1,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to statements of revenues and certain
expenses.
F-50
BRIDGEVIEW II
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
Period from January 1, 2005 through March 15, 2005
(unaudited)
and Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Tabular amounts in thousands)
|
|
(1) |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
relate to the operations of the property known as Bridgeview II
(the Property). The Property consists of one building located at
24590 Clawiter Road, Hayward, CA and is 100% leased by one
tenant.
On March 16, 2005, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the Company), through its operating partnership
subsidiary, BioMed Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership),
completed the acquisition of the Property from
F&S Hayward II, LLC (F&S Hayward). The
total purchase price was approximately $16.2 million. The
Operating Partnership funded the purchase price with proceeds
from the Companys unsecured revolving credit facility.
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
have been prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and,
accordingly, are not representative of the actual results of
operations of the Property for the period from January 1,
2005 through March 15, 2005 (unaudited) and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 due to the exclusion of the
following revenues and expenses, which may not be comparable to
the proposed future operations of the Property:
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee revenues received from tenants |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
Other costs not directly related to the proposed future
operations of the Property, including third-party management fees |
|
|
(2) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices |
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the respective leases.
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting and disclosure of revenues and certain
expenses during the reporting period to prepare the statements
of revenues and certain expenses in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
(c) |
Unaudited Interim Statement |
The statement of revenues and certain expenses for the period
from January 1, 2005 through March 15, 2005 is
unaudited. In the opinion of management, the statement reflects
all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results
of the interim period. All such adjustments are of a normal
recurring nature.
The Property leases laboratory and office space under a lease
agreement with its tenant. The lease is accounted for as an
operating lease. The lease includes provisions under which the
Property is reimbursed for common area expenses, real estate
taxes and insurance. Revenue related to these reimbursed costs is
F-51
BRIDGEVIEW II
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN
EXPENSES (Continued)
recognized in the period the applicable costs are incurred and
billed to the tenant pursuant to their lease agreement. The
lease contains renewal options at various times and rental rates.
Minimum rents to be received under the terms of the
non-cancelable operating lease agreement, excluding expense
reimbursements, in effect at December 31, 2004, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses include only those costs expected to be
comparable to the proposed future operations of the Property.
Repairs and maintenance expense are charged to operations as
incurred. Costs such as depreciation, amortization, management
fees and professional fees are excluded from the statements of
revenues and certain expenses.
|
|
(5) |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, one tenant accounted
for 100% of revenues.
F-52
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and
certain expenses of Nancy Ridge (the Property) for the year
ended December 31, 2004. This statement is the
responsibility of the management of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this statement
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Propertys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was
prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as
described in note 1 to the statement of revenues and
certain expenses. It is not intended to be a complete
presentation of Nancy Ridges revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the statement referred to above presents fairly,
in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses, as
described in note 1, of Nancy Ridge for the year ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
San Diego, California
June 3, 2005
F-53
NANCY RIDGE
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
1,419 |
|
|
Tenant reimbursements
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certain expenses
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of certain expenses
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to statements of revenues and certain
expenses.
F-54
NANCY RIDGE
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Tabular amounts in thousands)
|
|
(1) |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
relate to the operations of the property known as Nancy Ridge
(the Property). The Property consists of one building located at
6828 Nancy Ridge Drive, San Diego, CA and is fully leased
by two tenants.
On April 21, 2005, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the Company), through its operating partnership
subsidiary, BioMed Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership),
completed the acquisition of the Property from 6828 Nancy Ridge,
LLC. The total purchase price was approximately
$12.8 million. The Operating Partnership funded the
purchase price with the assumption of $7.0 million in debt
and $5.8 million in cash. The cash portion of the purchase
price was funded with borrowings under the Companys
unsecured revolving credit facility.
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
have been prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and,
accordingly, are not representative of the actual results of
operations of the Property for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) or for the year ended
December 31, 2004 due to the exclusion of the following
revenues and expenses, which may not be comparable to the
proposed future operations of the Property:
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee revenues received from tenants |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
Other costs not directly related to the proposed future
operations of the Property, including third-party management fees |
|
|
(2) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices |
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the respective leases.
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting and disclosure of revenues and certain
expenses during the reporting periods to prepare the statements
of revenues and certain expenses in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
(c) |
Unaudited Interim Statement |
The statement of revenues and certain expenses for the
three-months ended March 31, 2005 is unaudited. In the
opinion of management, the statement reflects all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim
period. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
The Property leases laboratory and office space under lease
agreements with its tenants. The leases are accounted for as
operating leases. The leases include provisions under which the
Property is reimbursed for common area expenses, real estate
taxes and insurance . Revenue related to these reimbursed costs
is recognized in the period the applicable costs are incurred
and billed to tenants pursuant to the lease agreements. Certain
leases contain renewal options at various times and rental rates.
F-55
NANCY RIDGE
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Tabular amounts in
thousands) (Continued)
Minimum rents to be received under the terms of the
non-cancelable operating lease agreements, excluding expense
reimbursements, in effect at December 31, 2004, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,538 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses include only those costs expected to be
comparable to the proposed future operations of the Property.
Repairs and maintenance expense are charged to operations as
incurred. Costs such as depreciation, amortization, management
fees and professional fees are excluded from the statements of
revenues and certain expenses.
In connection with the acquisition of the Property, the Company
will assume the $7.0 million of mortgage debt outstanding
as of December 31, 2004 secured by the Property. The
mortgage debt bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 7.15%,
requires monthly payments of principal and interest and matures
on September 1, 2012. As of December 31, 2004, annual
principal payments due on the mortgage debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
2006
|
|
|
80 |
|
2007
|
|
|
86 |
|
2008
|
|
|
91 |
|
2009
|
|
|
100 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, two tenants accounted
for 100% of revenues.
F-56
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and
certain expenses of Graphics Drive (the Property) for the year
ended December 31, 2004. This statement is the
responsibility of the management of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this statement
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Propertys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was
prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as
described in note 1 to the statement of revenues and
certain expenses. It is not intended to be a complete
presentation of Graphics Drives revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the statement referred to above presents fairly,
in all material respects, the revenue and certain expenses, as
described in note 1, of Graphics Drive for the year ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
San Diego, California
June 3, 2005
F-57
GRAPHICS DRIVE
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
through | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 16, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
Tenant reimbursements
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of certain expenses
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of certain expenses over revenues
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to statements of revenues and certain
expenses.
F-58
GRAPHICS DRIVE
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
Period from January 1, 2005 through March 16, 2005
(unaudited)
and Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Tabular amounts in thousands)
|
|
(1) |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
relate to the operations of the property known as Graphics Drive
(the Property). The Property consists of one building located at
7 Graphics Drive, Ewing, NJ and is 15% leased by one
tenant. The tenants lease commenced on April 1, 2004.
On March 17, 2005, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the Company), through its operating partnership
subsidiary, BioMed Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership),
completed the acquisition of the Property from Phillips
Associates I, L.L.C. (Phillips Associates). The total
purchase price was approximately $7.7 million. The
Operating Partnership funded the purchase price with proceeds
from the Companys unsecured revolving credit facility.
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
have been prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and,
accordingly, are not representative of the actual results of
operations of the Property for the period from January 1,
2005 through March 16, 2005 (unaudited) and for the year
ended December 31, 2004 due to the exclusion of the
following revenues and expenses, which may not be comparable to
the proposed future operations of the Property:
|
|
|
|
|
Management fee revenues received from tenants |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
Other costs not directly related to the proposed future
operations of the Property, including third-party management fees |
|
|
(2) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices |
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the respective lease.
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting and disclosure of revenues and certain
expenses during the reporting period to prepare the statements
of revenues and certain expenses in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
(c) |
Unaudited Interim Statement |
The statement of revenues and certain expenses for the period
from January 1, 2005 through March 16, 2005 is
unaudited. In the opinion of management, the statement reflects
all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results
of the interim period. All such adjustments are of a normal
recurring nature.
The Property leases laboratory and office space under a lease
agreement with its tenant. The lease is accounted for as an
operating lease. The lease includes provisions under which the
Property is reimbursed for common area expenses, real estate
taxes and insurance. Revenue related to these reimbursed costs is
F-59
GRAPHICS DRIVE
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN
EXPENSES (Continued)
recognized in the period the applicable costs are incurred and
billed to the tenant pursuant to the lease agreement. The lease
contains a renewal option which entitles the tenant to extend
the lease for three additional years.
Minimum rents to be received under the terms of the
non-cancelable operating lease agreement, excluding expense
reimbursements, in effect at December 31, 2004, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
148 |
|
2006
|
|
|
148 |
|
2007
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses include only those costs expected to be
comparable to the proposed future operations of the Property.
Repairs and maintenance expense are charged to operations as
incurred. Costs such as depreciation, amortization, management
fees and professional fees are excluded from the statement of
revenues and certain expenses.
|
|
(5) |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, one tenant accounted
for 100% of revenues.
F-60
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying statement of revenues and
certain expenses of Phoenixville (the Property) for the year
ended December 31, 2004. This statement is the
responsibility of the management of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this statement
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration
of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Propertys internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The accompanying statement of revenues and certain expenses was
prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as
described in note 1 to the statement of revenues and
certain expenses. It is not intended to be a complete
presentation of Phoenixvilles revenues and expenses.
In our opinion, the statement referred to above presents fairly,
in all material respects, the revenues and certain expenses, as
described in note 1, of Phoenixville for the year ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
San Diego, California
June 3, 2005
F-61
PHOENIXVILLE
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
615 |
|
|
Tenant reimbursements
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
Total certain expenses
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of certain expenses
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to statements of revenues and certain
expenses.
F-62
PHOENIXVILLE
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN EXPENSES
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 (unaudited) and
Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Tabular amounts in thousands)
|
|
(1) |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
relate to the operations of the property known as Phoenixville
(the Property). The Property consists of one building located at
335-395 Phoenixville Pike, Malvern, PA and is leased to six
tenants.
On April 5, 2005, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the Company), through its operating partnership
subsidiary, BioMed Realty, L.P. (the Operating Partnership),
completed the acquisition of the Property from 335-395
Phoenixville Pike Associates LP. The total purchase price was
approximately $13.2 million. The Operating Partnership
funded the purchase price with proceeds from the Companys
unsecured revolving credit facility.
The accompanying statements of revenues and certain expenses
have been prepared for the purpose of complying with the rules
and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and,
accordingly, are not representative of the actual results of
operations of the Property for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (unaudited) or for the year ended
December 31, 2004 due to the exclusion of the following
revenues and expenses, which may not be comparable to the
proposed future operations of the Property:
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
Other costs not directly related to the proposed future
operations of the Property |
Prior to the acquisition, the Property was managed by a
third-party management company. Following the acquisition, the
Property will be managed by a third-party manager under a new
management contract. In accordance with Rule 3-14, the
related management fee revenues and expenses are included in the
statements of revenues and certain expenses.
|
|
(2) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Practices |
Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the
term of the respective leases.
Management has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting and disclosure of revenues and certain
expenses during the reporting period to prepare the statements
of revenues and certain expenses in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
(c) |
Unaudited Interim Statement |
The statement of revenues and certain expenses for the
three-months ended March 31, 2005 is unaudited. In the
opinion of management, the statement reflects all adjustments
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim
period. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
The Property leases laboratory and office space under lease
agreements with its tenants. The leases are accounted for as
operating leases. The leases include provisions under which the
Property is reimbursed for common area expenses, real estate
taxes and insurance. Revenue related to these reimbursed costs
is recognized in the period the applicable costs are incurred
and billed to the tenants pursuant to the lease agreements. The
leases contain renewal options at various times and rental rates.
F-63
PHOENIXVILLE
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND CERTAIN
EXPENSES (Continued)
Minimum rents to be received under the terms of the
non-cancelable operating lease agreements, excluding expense
reimbursements, in effect at December 31, 2004, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
695 |
|
2006
|
|
|
691 |
|
2007
|
|
|
266 |
|
2008
|
|
|
185 |
|
2009
|
|
|
190 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certain expenses include only those costs expected to be
comparable to the proposed future operations of the Property.
Repairs and maintenance expense are charged to operations as
incurred. Costs such as depreciation, amortization, management
fees and professional fees are excluded from the statements of
revenues and certain expenses.
|
|
(5) |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, two tenants accounted
for approximately 62% and 19% of revenues. The other four
tenants accounted for approximately 19% of revenues.
F-64
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Prospectus Summary
|
|
|
1 |
|
Summary Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
8 |
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
11 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
30 |
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
31 |
|
Price Range of Common Stock and Distribution Policy
|
|
|
32 |
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
33 |
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
34 |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
37 |
|
Business and Properties
|
|
|
55 |
|
Management
|
|
|
76 |
|
Policies with Respect to Certain Activities
|
|
|
84 |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|
|
|
87 |
|
Structure and Formation of Our Company
|
|
|
89 |
|
Description of the Partnership Agreement of BioMed Realty,
L.P.
|
|
|
90 |
|
Principal Stockholders
|
|
|
95 |
|
Description of Securities
|
|
|
97 |
|
Certain Provisions of Maryland Law and of Our Charter and Bylaws
|
|
|
101 |
|
Federal Income Tax Considerations
|
|
|
105 |
|
ERISA Considerations
|
|
|
122 |
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
125 |
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
129 |
|
Experts
|
|
|
129 |
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
|
129 |
|
Index to Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
11,000,000 Shares
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
[ ],
2005
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 31. Other Expenses
of Issuance and Distribution.
The following table itemizes the expenses incurred by us in
connection with the issuance and registration of the securities
being registered hereunder, other than underwriting discounts
and commissions. All amounts shown are estimates except the
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee and the NASD
filing fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Registration Fee
|
|
$ |
32,890 |
|
NYSE Listing Fee
|
|
$ |
74,575 |
|
NASD Filing Fee
|
|
$ |
28,444 |
|
Printing and Engraving Expenses
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
Legal Fees and Expenses (other than Blue Sky)
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
Accounting and Fees and Expenses
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Transfer Agent Fees
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
$ |
56,591 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
We will pay all of the costs identified above.
Item 32. Sales to
Special Parties.
None.
Item 33. Recent Sales of
Unregistered Securities.
Upon our formation, Bruce A. Ives was issued 1,000 shares
of our common stock for total consideration of $1,000 in cash in
order to provide our initial capitalization. We replaced these
shares at cost upon completion of our IPO. The issuance of such
shares was effected in reliance upon an exemption from
registration provided by Section 4(2) under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.
In connection with the formation transactions,
2,782,364 units in our operating partnership, which are
convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of our common
stock, were issued to Alan D. Gold, Gary A. Kreitzer,
John F. Wilson, II, Julie A-M Wilson
(Mr. Wilsons wife), Mark A. Chandik, Duane
Dobbs, the William R. Hamlin and Jane L. Hamlin Family
Trust, the Susan B. Stockdale Trust Dated
October 8, 2003 and Glen P. Vieira, in exchange for
the contribution to us of interests in the entities that owned
certain properties and other assets (with an aggregate value of
$41.7 million). In addition, 88,200 operating partnership
units, which are convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares
of our common stock, were issued to Matthew G. McDevitt and
Holly K. McDevitt (Mr. McDevitts wife), in
exchange for the contribution to us of interests in the entities
that own certain of our properties (with an aggregate value of
$1.3 million). All of such persons are accredited
investors as defined under Regulation D of the
Securities Act. The issuance of such units was effected in
reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by
Section 4(2) under the Securities Act.
We granted to Raymond James & Associates, Inc. a
warrant to purchase a number of shares of our common stock equal
to 1.0% of the common stock that was issued in connection with
our IPO, totaling 270,000 shares. Based on Raymond
James & Associates, Inc.s representation as to
its status as an accredited investor, we issued the warrant to
purchase shares of our common stock in reliance on the exemption
from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder.
II-1
Item 34. Indemnification
of Directors and Officers.
Maryland law permits a Maryland corporation to include in its
charter a provision limiting the liability of its directors and
officers to the corporation and its stockholders for money
damages except for liability resulting from (1) actual
receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property or
services or (2) active and deliberate dishonesty
established by a final judgment and which is material to the
cause of action. Our charter contains a provision which
eliminates directors and officers liability to the
maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
Our charter authorizes us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law, to obligate ourselves to indemnify and to pay or
reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of
a proceeding to (1) any present or former director or
officer or (2) any individual who, while a director or
officer of our company and at our request, serves or has served
another REIT, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or any other enterprise as a trustee,
director, officer or partner of such REIT, corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or
other enterprise from and against any claim or liability to
which such individual may become subject or which such
individual may incur by reason of his service in such capacity.
Our bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by
Maryland law, to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable
expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to
(1) any present or former director or officer who is made a
party to the proceeding by reason of his service in that
capacity or (2) any individual who, while a director or
officer of our company and at our request, serves or has served
another REIT, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust,
employee benefit plan or other enterprise as a trustee,
director, officer or partner and who is made a party to the
proceeding by reason of his service in that capacity, against
any claim or liability to which he may become subject or may
incur by reason of his status as a present or former director or
officer of the company. Our charter and bylaws also permit us to
indemnify and advance expenses to any individual who served a
predecessor of our company in any of the capacities described
above and to any employee or agent of our company or a
predecessor of our company.
Maryland law requires a corporation (unless its charter provides
otherwise, which our charter does not) to indemnify a director
or officer who has been successful, on the merits or otherwise,
in the defense of any proceeding to which he is made a party by
reason of his service in that capacity. Maryland law permits a
corporation to indemnify its present and former directors and
officers, among others, against judgments, penalties, fines,
settlements and reasonable expenses actually incurred by them in
connection with any proceeding to which they may be made a party
by reason of their service in those or other capacities unless
it is established that (1) the act or omission of the
director or officer was material to the matter giving rise to
the proceeding and (A) was committed in bad faith or
(B) was a result of active and deliberate dishonesty,
(2) the director or officer actually received an improper
personal benefit in money, property or services or (3) in
the case of any criminal proceeding, the director or officer had
reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful. However, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify for
an adverse judgment in a suit by or in the right if the
corporation or if the director or officer was adjudged to be
liable on the basis of an improperly received personal benefit,
unless in either case a court orders indemnification and then
only for expenses. Maryland law permits a corporation to advance
reasonable expenses to a director or officer upon the
corporations receipt of (1) a written affirmation by
the director or officer of his good faith belief that he has met
the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification and
(2) a written undertaking by him or on his behalf to repay
the amount paid or reimbursed by us if it shall ultimately be
determined that the standard of conduct was not met.
We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our
executive officers and directors whereby we agree to indemnify
such executive officers and directors to the fullest extent
permitted by Maryland law against all expenses and liabilities,
subject to limited exceptions. The indemnification agreements
require us to indemnify the director or officer party thereto,
the indemnitee, against all judgments, penalties, fines and
amounts paid in settlement and all expenses actually and
reasonably incurred by the indemnitee or on his or her behalf in
connection with a proceeding other than one initiated by or on
behalf of us. In addition, the indemnification agreements
require us to indemnify the indemnitee against all amounts paid
in settlement and all expenses actually and reasonably incurred
by the indemnitee
II-2
or on his or her behalf in connection with a proceeding that is
brought by or on behalf of us. In either case, the indemnitee is
not entitled to indemnification if it is established that one of
the exceptions to indemnification under Maryland law set forth
above exists.
In addition, the indemnification agreements require us to
advance reasonable expenses incurred by the indemnitee within
ten days of the receipt by us of a statement from the indemnitee
requesting the advance, provided the statement evidences the
expenses and is accompanied by:
|
|
|
|
|
a written affirmation of the indemnitees good faith belief
that he or she has met the standard of conduct necessary for
indemnification, and |
|
|
|
an undertaking by or on behalf of the Indemnitee to repay the
amount if it is ultimately determined that the standard of
conduct was not met. |
The indemnification agreements also provide for procedures for
the determination of entitlement to indemnification, including
requiring such determination be made by independent counsel
after a change of control of us.
In addition, our directors and officers are indemnified for
specified liabilities and expenses pursuant to the partnership
agreement of BioMed Realty, L.P., the partnership in which we
serve as sole general partner.
Insofar as the foregoing provisions permit indemnification of
directors, officers or persons controlling us for liability
arising under the Securities Act, we have been informed that, in
the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
|
|
Item 35. |
Treatment of Proceeds from Stock Being Registered. |
None.
|
|
Item 36. |
Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
(A) Financial Statements. See Index to Financial
Statements.
(B) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as
part of, or incorporated by reference into, this registration
statement on Form S-11:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
.1 |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement among BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
and the underwriters named therein.(8) |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.(1) |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.(1) |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Form of Certificate for Common Stock of BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.(2) |
|
5 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Venable LLP with respect to the legality of the
shares being registered.(8) |
|
8 |
.1 |
|
Opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP with respect to tax
matters.(8) |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
BioMed Realty, L.P. dated as of August 13, 2004.(1) |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 13, 2004
among BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and the persons named therein.(1) |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
2004 Incentive Award Plan.(1) |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004
Incentive Award Plan.(3) |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc. and each of its directors and officers.(2) |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and Alan
D. Gold dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and Gary
A. Kreitzer dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and John
F. Wilson, II dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
Matthew G. McDevitt dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Contribution Agreement between Alan D. Gold and BioMed Realty,
L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Contribution Agreement between Gary A. Kreitzer and BioMed
Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Contribution Agreement between John F. Wilson, II and
BioMed Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Contribution Agreement between Matthew G. McDevitt and BioMed
Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Form of Contribution Agreement between the additional
contributors and BioMed Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4,
2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Agreement to Enter Lease of Real Property between Eastview
Holdings LLC and BMR-Landmark at Eastview LLC dated as of
June 21, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
First Amendment to Agreement to Enter Lease of Real Property
between Eastview Holdings LLC and BMR-Landmark at Eastview LLC
dated as of June 23, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale for Partnership Interests
among Radnor Properties Associates-II, L.P., Radnor GP-145 KOP,
L.L.C., BMR-145 King of Prussia Road GP LLC and BioMed Realty
L.P. dated as of June 24, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions among
F&S Hayward, Inc., Foster Enterprises, Syme Family Partners
L.P. and BMR-Bridgeview Technology Park LLC dated as of
June 10, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.19 |
|
Purchase Agreement among Douglas P. Wilson, BMR-Bayshore
Boulevard LLC, GAL-Brisbane L.P., Brisbane Tech LLC and Roger C.
Stuhlmuller dated as of May 24, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.20 |
|
Amendment to Purchase Agreement among Douglas P. Wilson,
BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC, GAL-Brisbane L.P., Brisbane Tech LLC
and Roger C. Stuhlmuller dated as of June 16, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.21 |
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Elliott Park LLC and
BMR-201 Elliott Avenue LLC dated as of June 3, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.22 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions between
Illumina, Inc. and BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC dated as of
June 18, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions among
Phase 3 Science Center LLC, Ahwatukee Hills Investors, LLC,
J. Alexanders LLC and BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC
dated as of June 2, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.24 |
|
Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease between Radnor
Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated as of
March 8, 2002.(2) |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
First Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease
between Radnor Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated
as of June 21, 2002.(2) |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Second Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease
between Radnor Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated
as of March 3, 2003.(2) |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
Third Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease
between Radnor Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated
as of January 19, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Redemption Agreement among Nektar Therapeutics (formerly
known as Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Inc.), SciMed
Prop III, Inc., 201 Industrial Partnership and Inhale 201
Industrial Road, L.P. dated as of June 23, 2004.(2) |
|
10 |
.29 |
|
Amended and Restated Build-to-Suit Lease between Inhale 201
Industrial Road, L.P. and Nektar Therapeutics (formerly known as
Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Inc.).(1) |
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.30 |
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Built-to-Suit Lease dated as
of January 11, 2005 between BMR-201 Industrial Road LLC and
Nektar Therapeutics.(3) |
|
10 |
.31 |
|
Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of August 11, 2004 by and
among BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., BioMed Realty, L.P., the other
borrowers and lenders party thereto, U.S. Bank National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Lead Arranger and Swing
Loan Bank, KeyBank National Association, as Syndication
Agent, and Royal Bank of Canada, as Documentation Agent.(1) |
|
10 |
.32 |
|
Master Loan Agreement dated December 28, 2004 between
BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC, BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC and
BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC, and The Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.33 |
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (First Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC in favor of
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.34 |
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (First Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.35 |
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (First Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.36 |
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (Second Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC in favor of
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.37 |
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (Second Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.38 |
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (Second Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.39 |
|
Fraudulent Conveyance Indemnity Agreement dated
December 28, 2004 by BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. in favor of
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
|
10 |
.40 |
|
BioMed Realty 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.(3) |
|
10 |
.41 |
|
First Amendment to the BioMed Realty 401(k) Retirement Savings
Plan.(3) |
|
10 |
.42 |
|
Second Amendment to the BioMed Realty 401(k) Retirement Savings
Plan.(3) |
|
10 |
.43 |
|
Agreement for Purchase of Real Estate, dated as of
April 15, 2005, between BioMed Realty, L.P. and The Lyme
Timber Company.(5) |
|
10 |
.44 |
|
Radnor Technology and Research Center Office and Cafeteria
Lease, dated as of June 21, 2002, between BMR-145 King of
Prussia Road LP and Centocor, Inc.(6) |
|
10 |
.45 |
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of January 19, 2004,
between BMR-145 King of Prussia Road LP and Centocor, Inc.(6) |
|
10 |
.46 |
|
Second Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Office
and Cafeteria Lease, dated as of April 19, 2005, between
BMR-145 King of Prussia Road LP and Centocor, Inc.(6) |
|
10 |
.47 |
|
Secured Term Loan Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2005, by
and among BioMed Realty, L.P., KeyBank National Association, as
Administrative Agent, and certain lenders party thereto.(7) |
|
10 |
.48 |
|
Form of Secured Term Loan Note.(7) |
|
10 |
.49 |
|
Unsecured Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2005, by
and among BioMed Realty, L.P., KeyBank National Association, as
Administrative Agent, and certain lenders party thereto.(7) |
|
10 |
.50 |
|
Form of Line Note under Unsecured Credit Agreement.(7) |
|
10 |
.51 |
|
Form of Term Note under Unsecured Credit Agreement.(7) |
|
10 |
.52 |
|
Assumption, Consent and Loan Modification Agreement, dated as of
May 31, 2005, by and among KS Parcel D, LLC, The Lyme
Timber Company, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., BMR 500
Kendall Street LLC and The Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Company.(7) |
|
10 |
.53 |
|
Promissory Note, dated as of November 21, 2003, to The
Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company.(7) |
|
10 |
.54 |
|
Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing, Financing
Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated as of
November 21, 2003, in favor of The Variable Annuity Life
Insurance Company.(7) |
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.55 |
|
Lease, dated as of August 28, 2000, by and between Kendall
Square, LLC and Genzyme Corporation.(7) |
|
10 |
.56 |
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of August 1, 2003, by
and between Kendall Square, LLC and Genzyme Corporation.(7) |
|
10 |
.57 |
|
Lease, dated as of January 18, 2001, by and between Kendall
Square, LLC and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.58 |
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of May 9, 2002, by and
between Kendall Square, LLC and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.59 |
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 16, 2003,
by and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to Kendall Square,
LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.60 |
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of December 22, 2003, by
and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to Kendall Square,
LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.61 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 30, 2004,
by and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to Kendall Square,
LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.62 |
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated as of April 15, 2005, by
and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to Kendall Square,
LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.63 |
|
Lease, dated as of September 17, 1999, by and between
Trustees of Fort Washington Realty Trust and Vertex
Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.64 |
|
Lease, dated March 3, 1995, by and between
Fort Washington Limited Partnership and Vertex
Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.65 |
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of December 1996, by and
between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.66 |
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of June 13, 1997, by
and between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.67 |
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of October 1, 1998, by
and between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.68 |
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated as of February 22, 2000,
by and between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.69 |
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated as of May 1, 1999, by and
between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
|
10 |
.70 |
|
Sixth Amendment to Lease, dated as of April 6, 2005, by and
between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
List of Subsidiaries of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.(8) |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Venable LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).(8) |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of Latham & Watkins LLP (included in
Exhibit 8.1).(8) |
|
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, independent registered accounting firm.(8) |
|
23 |
.4 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, independent auditors.(8) |
|
24 |
.1 |
|
Power of Attorney (included on Signature Page).(8) |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Registration Statement of Form S-11, as amended
(File No. 333-115204), filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 5, 2004. |
II-6
|
|
(3) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2005. |
|
(4) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2005. |
|
(5) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2005. |
|
(6) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2005. |
|
(7) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 3, 2005. |
|
(8) |
Filed herewith. |
Item 37. Undertakings.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreements certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
|
|
|
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective. |
|
|
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof. |
II-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds
to believe that the registrant meets all of the requirements for
filing on Form S-11 and has duly caused this registration
statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Diego, State
of California, on this 3rd day of June, 2005.
|
|
|
BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan D. Gold |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Alan D. Gold and Gary A.
Kreitzer, and each of them, with full power to act without the
other, such persons true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and
all capacities, to sign this Registration Statement, and any and
all pre-effective and post-effective amendments thereto as well
as any related registration statements (or amendment thereto)
filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and to file the same, with
exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and
about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them, or their or his or her substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Registration Statement has been signed by the
following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan D. Gold
Alan
D. Gold |
|
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
June 3, 2005 |
|
/s/ John F.
Wilson, II
John
F. Wilson, II |
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
June 3, 2005 |
|
/s/ Gary A. Kreitzer
Gary
A. Kreitzer |
|
Executive Vice President,
General Counsel, Secretary
and Director |
|
June 3, 2005 |
|
/s/ Barbara R. Cambon
Barbara
R. Cambon |
|
Director |
|
June 3, 2005 |
|
/s/ Edward A. Dennis
Edward
A. Dennis |
|
Director |
|
June 3, 2005 |
II-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark J. Riedy
Mark
J. Riedy |
|
Director |
|
June 3, 2005 |
|
/s/ Theodore D. Roth
Theodore
D. Roth |
|
Director |
|
June 3, 2005 |
|
/s/ M. Faye Wilson
M.
Faye Wilson |
|
Director |
|
June 3, 2005 |
II-9
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement among BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.
and the underwriters named therein.(8) |
3.1
|
|
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.(1) |
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.(1) |
4.1
|
|
Form of Certificate for Common Stock of BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.(2) |
5.1
|
|
Opinion of Venable LLP with respect to the legality of the
shares being registered.(8) |
8.1
|
|
Opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP with respect to tax
matters.(8) |
10.1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
BioMed Realty, L.P. dated as of August 13, 2004.(1) |
10.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 13, 2004
among BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and the persons named therein.(1) |
10.3
|
|
2004 Incentive Award Plan.(1) |
10.4
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2004
Incentive Award Plan.(3) |
10.5
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc. and each of its directors and officers.(2) |
10.6
|
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and Alan
D. Gold dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
10.7
|
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and Gary
A. Kreitzer dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
10.8
|
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and John
F. Wilson, II dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
10.9
|
|
Employment Agreement between BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. and
Matthew G. McDevitt dated as of August 6, 2004.(1) |
10.10
|
|
Contribution Agreement between Alan D. Gold and BioMed Realty,
L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
10.11
|
|
Contribution Agreement between Gary A. Kreitzer and BioMed
Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
10.12
|
|
Contribution Agreement between John F. Wilson, II and
BioMed Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
10.13
|
|
Contribution Agreement between Matthew G. McDevitt and BioMed
Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4, 2004.(2) |
10.14
|
|
Form of Contribution Agreement between the additional
contributors and BioMed Realty, L.P. dated as of May 4,
2004.(2) |
10.15
|
|
Agreement to Enter Lease of Real Property between Eastview
Holdings LLC and BMR-Landmark at Eastview LLC dated as of
June 21, 2004.(2) |
10.16
|
|
First Amendment to Agreement to Enter Lease of Real Property
between Eastview Holdings LLC and BMR-Landmark at Eastview LLC
dated as of June 23, 2004.(2) |
10.17
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale for Partnership Interests
among Radnor Properties Associates-II, L.P., Radnor GP-145 KOP,
L.L.C., BMR-145 King of Prussia Road GP LLC and BioMed Realty
L.P. dated as of June 24, 2004.(2) |
10.18
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions among
F&S Hayward, Inc., Foster Enterprises, Syme Family Partners
L.P. and BMR-Bridgeview Technology Park LLC dated as of
June 10, 2004.(2) |
10.19
|
|
Purchase Agreement among Douglas P. Wilson, BMR-Bayshore
Boulevard LLC, GAL-Brisbane L.P., Brisbane Tech LLC and Roger C.
Stuhlmuller dated as of May 24, 2004.(2) |
10.20
|
|
Amendment to Purchase Agreement among Douglas P. Wilson,
BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC, GAL-Brisbane L.P., Brisbane Tech LLC
and Roger C. Stuhlmuller dated as of June 16, 2004.(2) |
10.21
|
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Elliott Park LLC and
BMR-201 Elliott Avenue LLC dated as of June 3, 2004.(2) |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions between
Illumina, Inc. and BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC dated as of
June 18, 2004.(2) |
10.23
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions among
Phase 3 Science Center LLC, Ahwatukee Hills Investors, LLC,
J. Alexanders LLC and BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC
dated as of June 2, 2004.(2) |
10.24
|
|
Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease between Radnor
Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated as of
March 8, 2002.(2) |
10.25
|
|
First Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease
between Radnor Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated
as of June 21, 2002.(2) |
10.26
|
|
Second Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease
between Radnor Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated
as of March 3, 2003.(2) |
10.27
|
|
Third Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Lease
between Radnor Properties-145 KOP, L.P. and Centocor, Inc. dated
as of January 19, 2004.(2) |
10.28
|
|
Redemption Agreement among Nektar Therapeutics (formerly known
as Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Inc.), SciMed Prop III,
Inc., 201 Industrial Partnership and Inhale 201 Industrial Road,
L.P. dated as of June 23, 2004.(2) |
10.29
|
|
Amended and Restated Build-to-Suit Lease between Inhale 201
Industrial Road, L.P. and Nektar Therapeutics (formerly known as
Inhale Therapeutic Systems, Inc.).(1) |
10.30
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Built-to-Suit Lease dated as
of January 11, 2005 between BMR-201 Industrial Road LLC and
Nektar Therapeutics.(3) |
10.31
|
|
Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of August 11, 2004 by and
among BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., BioMed Realty, L.P., the other
borrowers and lenders party thereto, U.S. Bank National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Lead Arranger and Swing
Loan Bank, KeyBank National Association, as Syndication
Agent, and Royal Bank of Canada, as Documentation Agent.(1) |
10.32
|
|
Master Loan Agreement dated December 28, 2004 between
BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC, BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC and
BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC, and The Northwestern Mutual
Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.33
|
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (First Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC in favor of
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.34
|
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (First Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.35
|
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (First Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.36
|
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (Second Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-Bayshore Boulevard LLC in favor of
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.37
|
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (Second Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-3450 Monte Villa Parkway LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.38
|
|
Deed of Trust and Security Agreement (Second Priority) dated
December 28, 2004 by BMR-9885 Towne Centre Drive LLC in
favor of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.39
|
|
Fraudulent Conveyance Indemnity Agreement dated
December 28, 2004 by BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. in favor of
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company.(4) |
10.40
|
|
BioMed Realty 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.(3) |
10.41
|
|
First Amendment to the BioMed Realty 401(k) Retirement Savings
Plan.(3) |
10.42
|
|
Second Amendment to the BioMed Realty 401(k) Retirement Savings
Plan.(3) |
10.43
|
|
Agreement for Purchase of Real Estate, dated as of
April 15, 2005, between BioMed Realty, L.P. and The Lyme
Timber Company.(5) |
10.44
|
|
Radnor Technology and Research Center Office and Cafeteria
Lease, dated as of June 21, 2002, between BMR-145 King of
Prussia Road LP and Centocor, Inc.(6) |
10.45
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of January 19, 2004,
between BMR-145 King of Prussia Road LP and Centocor, Inc.(6) |
10.46
|
|
Second Amendment to Radnor Technology and Research Center Office
and Cafeteria Lease, dated as of April 19, 2005, between
BMR-145 King of Prussia Road LP and Centocor, Inc.(6) |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
|
Secured Term Loan Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2005, by
and among BioMed Realty, L.P., KeyBank National Association, as
Administrative Agent, and certain lenders party thereto.(7) |
10.48
|
|
Form of Secured Term Loan Note.(7) |
10.49
|
|
Unsecured Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2005, by
and among BioMed Realty, L.P., KeyBank National Association, as
Administrative Agent, and certain lenders party thereto.(7) |
10.50
|
|
Form of Line Note under Unsecured Credit Agreement.(7) |
10.51
|
|
Form of Term Note under Unsecured Credit Agreement.(7) |
10.52
|
|
Assumption, Consent and Loan Modification Agreement, dated as of
May 31, 2005, by and among KS Parcel D, LLC, The
Lyme Timber Company, BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., BMR
500 Kendall Street LLC and The Variable Annuity Life Insurance
Company.(7) |
10.53
|
|
Promissory Note, dated as of November 21, 2003, to The
Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company.(7) |
10.54
|
|
Mortgage, Security Agreement, Fixture Filing, Financing
Statement and Assignment of Leases and Rents, dated as of
November 21, 2003, in favor of The Variable Annuity Life
Insurance Company.(7) |
10.55
|
|
Lease, dated as of August 28, 2000, by and between Kendall
Square, LLC and Genzyme Corporation.(7) |
10.56
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of August 1, 2003, by
and between Kendall Square, LLC and Genzyme Corporation.(7) |
10.57
|
|
Lease, dated as of January 18, 2001, by and between Kendall
Square, LLC and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
10.58
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of May 9, 2002, by and
between Kendall Square, LLC and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
10.59
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 16, 2003,
by and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to
Kendall Square, LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
10.60
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of December 22, 2003, by
and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to Kendall
Square, LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
10.61
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated as of September 30, 2004,
by and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to
Kendall Square, LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
10.62
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated as of April 15, 2005, by
and between KS Parcel A, LLC, as successor to Kendall
Square, LLC, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
10.63
|
|
Lease, dated as of September 17, 1999, by and between
Trustees of Fort Washington Realty Trust and Vertex
Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
10.64
|
|
Lease, dated March 3, 1995, by and between
Fort Washington Limited Partnership and Vertex
Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.(7) |
10.65
|
|
First Amendment to Lease, dated as of December 1996, by and
between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
10.66
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease, dated as of June 13, 1997, by
and between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
10.67
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease, dated as of October 1, 1998, by
and between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
10.68
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease, dated as of February 22, 2000,
by and between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
10.69
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease, dated as of May 1, 1999, by and
between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
10.70
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Lease, dated as of April 6, 2005, by and
between David E. Clem and David M. Roby, as Trustees of
Fort Washington Realty Trust, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals
Incorporated.(7) |
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc.(8) |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Venable LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).(8) |
23.2
|
|
Consent of Latham & Watkins LLP (included in
Exhibit 8.1).(8) |
23.3
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, independent registered accounting firm.(8) |
23.4
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, independent auditors.(8) |
24.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (included on Signature Page).(8) |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Registration Statement of Form S-11, as amended
(File No. 333-115204), filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 5, 2004. |
|
(3) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 14, 2005. |
|
(4) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 4, 2005. |
|
(5) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2005. |
|
(6) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 19, 2005. |
|
(7) |
Incorporated herein by reference to BioMed Realty Trust,
Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 3, 2005. |
|
(8) |
Filed herewith. |