e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14793
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
66-0561882
(I.R.S. employer
identification number) |
|
|
|
1519 Ponce de León Avenue, Stop 23
Santurce, Puerto Rico
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
00908
(Zip Code) |
(787) 729-8200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common stock: 92,542,722 outstanding as of November 2, 2009.
FIRST BANCORP.
INDEX PAGE
2
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, First BanCorp (the
Corporation) may make forward-looking statements in its press releases, other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or in other public or stockholder communications.
These forward-looking statements may relate to the Corporations financial condition, results
of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to,
statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, market risk and
the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity,
and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting guidance on the Corporations financial
condition and results of operations. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that
they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, and are generally identified by the use
of words or phrases such as would be, will allow, intends to, will likely result, are
expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimate, project, believe, expect, may
or similar expressions.
First BanCorp cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking
statements since they speak only as of the date made and represent First BanCorps expectations of
future conditions or results and are not guarantees of future performance. The Corporation does not
undertake and specifically disclaims any obligations to update any forward-looking statements to
reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of those statements.
Forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties. While
there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below
are certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially to those
contained in any forward-looking statement:
|
|
|
the strength or weakness of the real estate markets and of the consumer and commercial
credit sectors and its impact on the credit quality of the Corporations loans and other
assets, including the Corporations construction and commercial
real estate loan portfolios, which have
contributed and may continue to contribute, among other things, to the increase in the
levels of non-performing assets, charge-offs and the provision expense; |
|
|
|
|
adverse changes in general economic conditions in the United States and in Puerto Rico,
including the interest rate scenario, market liquidity, housing absorption rates and real
estate prices, and disruptions in the U.S. capital markets, which may reduce interest
margins, impact funding sources and affect demand for all of the Corporations products and
services and the value of the Corporations assets, including the value of derivative
instruments used for protection from interest rate fluctuations; |
|
|
|
|
an adverse change in the Corporations ability to attract new clients and retain existing
ones; |
|
|
|
|
a decrease in demand for the Corporations products and services and lower revenues and
earnings because of the continued recession in Puerto Rico and the current fiscal problems
and budget deficit of the Puerto Rico government; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about the legislative and other measures adopted by the Puerto Rico
government in response to its fiscal deficit situation and the impact of such measures on
several sectors of the Puerto Rico economy; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainty about the effectiveness of the various actions undertaken to stimulate the
United States economy and stabilize the United States financial markets, and the impact
such actions may have on the Corporations business, financial condition and results of
operations; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the fiscal and monetary policies and regulations of the federal government,
including those determined by the Federal Reserve System (FED), the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), government-sponsored housing agencies and local regulators in
Puerto Rico and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands; |
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to generate sufficient income to realize the benefit of the
deferred tax asset; |
|
|
|
|
risks of not being able to recover the assets pledged to Lehman Brothers Special
Financing, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the soundness of other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the Corporations expenses associated with acquisitions and dispositions; |
|
|
|
|
developments in technology; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of Doral Financial Corporations financial condition on the repayment of
its outstanding secured loans to the Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
the Corporations ability to issue brokered certificates of deposit and fund operations; |
3
|
|
|
risks associated with downgrades in the credit ratings of the Corporations securities; |
|
|
|
|
general competitive factors and industry consolidation; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with regulatory and legislative changes for financial services companies
in Puerto Rico, the United States, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands, which could
affect the Corporations financial performance and could cause the Corporations actual
results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected; and |
|
|
|
|
the risk that the FDIC may further increase the deposit insurance premium and/or require
special assessments to replenish its insurance fund, causing an increase in our non-interest
expense. |
Investors should refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as well as Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for a discussion of such factors and certain risks and uncertainties to which the Corporation
is subject.
4
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share information) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
124,131 |
|
|
$ |
329,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
71,264 |
|
|
|
54,469 |
|
Time deposits with other financial institutions |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Other short-term investments |
|
|
20,127 |
|
|
|
20,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total money market investments |
|
|
91,991 |
|
|
|
76,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged |
|
|
3,330,247 |
|
|
|
2,913,721 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
1,424,742 |
|
|
|
948,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
|
4,754,989 |
|
|
|
3,862,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged |
|
|
431,561 |
|
|
|
968,389 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
213,539 |
|
|
|
738,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to maturity, fair value of $670,395 (2008 $1,720,412) |
|
|
645,100 |
|
|
|
1,706,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
78,930 |
|
|
|
64,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan and lease losses of $471,484 (2008 $281,526) |
|
|
13,258,788 |
|
|
|
12,796,363 |
|
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market |
|
|
25,896 |
|
|
|
10,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net |
|
|
13,284,684 |
|
|
|
12,806,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
195,371 |
|
|
|
178,468 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
67,493 |
|
|
|
37,246 |
|
Accrued interest receivable on loans and investments |
|
|
77,532 |
|
|
|
98,565 |
|
Due from customers on acceptances |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
Account receivable from investment sales |
|
|
464,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
295,432 |
|
|
|
330,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
20,081,185 |
|
|
$ |
19,491,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
695,928 |
|
|
$ |
625,928 |
|
Interest bearing deposits (including $0 and $1,150,959 measured
at fair value as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
11,602,862 |
|
|
|
12,431,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
12,298,790 |
|
|
|
13,057,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable |
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
3,782,134 |
|
|
|
3,421,042 |
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) |
|
|
1,200,440 |
|
|
|
1,060,440 |
|
Notes payable (including $13,140 and $10,141 measured at fair value
as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) |
|
|
26,531 |
|
|
|
23,274 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
231,914 |
|
Bank acceptances outstanding |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
141,866 |
|
|
|
148,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
18,382,342 |
|
|
|
17,943,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, authorized 50,000,000 shares: issued and
outstanding 22,404,000 shares (2008 22,004,000)
at an aggregate liquidation value of $950,100 (December 31, 2008 $550,100) |
|
|
927,374 |
|
|
|
550,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 250,000,000 shares;
issued 102,440,522 (2008 102,444,549) |
|
|
102,440 |
|
|
|
102,444 |
|
Less: Treasury stock (at cost) |
|
|
(9,898 |
) |
|
|
(9,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock outstanding, 92,542,722 shares outstanding (2008 92,546,749) |
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
92,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
134,201 |
|
|
|
108,299 |
|
Legal surplus |
|
|
299,006 |
|
|
|
299,006 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
172,625 |
|
|
|
440,777 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred tax expense of $6,590 (2008 $717) |
|
|
73,095 |
|
|
|
57,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,698,843 |
|
|
|
1,548,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
20,081,185 |
|
|
$ |
19,491,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
179,956 |
|
|
$ |
208,241 |
|
|
$ |
553,219 |
|
|
$ |
626,846 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
61,881 |
|
|
|
79,077 |
|
|
|
199,513 |
|
|
|
211,095 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
6,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
242,022 |
|
|
|
288,292 |
|
|
|
753,125 |
|
|
|
843,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
72,163 |
|
|
|
95,089 |
|
|
|
246,931 |
|
|
|
301,053 |
|
Loans payable |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
28,327 |
|
|
|
35,790 |
|
|
|
87,487 |
|
|
|
98,698 |
|
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
24,736 |
|
|
|
30,738 |
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
3,809 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
10,803 |
|
|
|
9,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
112,889 |
|
|
|
143,671 |
|
|
|
371,380 |
|
|
|
440,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
129,133 |
|
|
|
144,621 |
|
|
|
381,745 |
|
|
|
403,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
148,090 |
|
|
|
55,319 |
|
|
|
442,671 |
|
|
|
142,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (loss) income after provision
for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(18,957 |
) |
|
|
89,302 |
|
|
|
(60,926 |
) |
|
|
261,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other service charges on loans |
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
4,343 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
9,950 |
|
|
|
9,725 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
Net gain on sale of investments |
|
|
34,274 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
62,417 |
|
|
|
16,135 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on
investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(32,929 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt
securities
not expected to be sold (recognized in other
comprehensive income) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(1,658 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
Rental income |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
Other non-interest income |
|
|
7,280 |
|
|
|
7,839 |
|
|
|
20,475 |
|
|
|
22,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
49,989 |
|
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
103,457 |
|
|
|
55,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits |
|
|
34,403 |
|
|
|
35,629 |
|
|
|
103,117 |
|
|
|
106,949 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
15,291 |
|
|
|
15,647 |
|
|
|
47,513 |
|
|
|
46,167 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
9,831 |
|
|
|
13,150 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
10,334 |
|
|
|
12,702 |
|
Taxes, other than income taxes |
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
11,911 |
|
|
|
12,256 |
|
Insurance and supervisory fees |
|
|
7,197 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
|
|
30,491 |
|
|
|
12,142 |
|
Net loss on real estate owned (REO) operations |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
5,626 |
|
|
|
17,016 |
|
|
|
12,054 |
|
Other non-interest expenses |
|
|
10,293 |
|
|
|
10,212 |
|
|
|
33,080 |
|
|
|
30,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
82,777 |
|
|
|
82,376 |
|
|
|
263,293 |
|
|
|
246,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(51,745 |
) |
|
|
20,797 |
|
|
|
(220,762 |
) |
|
|
70,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(113,473 |
) |
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
20,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(165,218 |
) |
|
$ |
24,546 |
|
|
$ |
(221,985 |
) |
|
$ |
91,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
(174,689 |
) |
|
$ |
14,477 |
|
|
$ |
(262,741 |
) |
|
$ |
60,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.89 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(2.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.89 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(2.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
6
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(221,985 |
) |
|
$ |
91,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
15,722 |
|
|
|
14,188 |
|
Amortization and impairment of core deposit intangible |
|
|
6,689 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
442,671 |
|
|
|
142,435 |
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
19,202 |
|
|
|
(23,986 |
) |
Stock-based compensation recognized |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments, net |
|
|
(62,417 |
) |
|
|
(16,135 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
Derivatives instruments and hedging activities gain |
|
|
(13,228 |
) |
|
|
(31,889 |
) |
Net gain on sale of loans and impairments |
|
|
(5,919 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
Net amortization of premiums and discounts and deferred loan fees and costs |
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
(956 |
) |
Net increase in mortgage loans held for sale |
|
|
(21,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of broker placement fees |
|
|
17,434 |
|
|
|
10,935 |
|
Net amortization (accretion) of premium and discounts on investment securities |
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
(8,196 |
) |
Decrease in accrued income tax payable |
|
|
(21,919 |
) |
|
|
(13,429 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
19,010 |
|
|
|
17,018 |
|
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(24,472 |
) |
|
|
(37,906 |
) |
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
41,716 |
|
|
|
12,716 |
|
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(4,521 |
) |
|
|
(15,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
416,981 |
|
|
|
51,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
194,996 |
|
|
|
142,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collected on loans |
|
|
2,267,772 |
|
|
|
2,081,236 |
|
Loans originated |
|
|
(3,362,850 |
) |
|
|
(2,858,266 |
) |
Purchases of loans |
|
|
(142,446 |
) |
|
|
(373,997 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of loans |
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
|
106,583 |
|
Proceeds from sale of repossessed assets |
|
|
50,035 |
|
|
|
54,127 |
|
Purchase of servicing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
1,038,814 |
|
|
|
389,784 |
|
Purchases of securities held to maturity |
|
|
(8,460 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
Purchases of securities available for sale |
|
|
(2,781,394 |
) |
|
|
(3,368,093 |
) |
Principal repayments and maturities of securities held to maturity |
|
|
1,066,778 |
|
|
|
1,551,272 |
|
Principal repayments of securities available for sale |
|
|
721,056 |
|
|
|
255,425 |
|
Additions to premises and equipment |
|
|
(32,625 |
) |
|
|
(21,663 |
) |
Proceeds from sale/redemption of other investment securities |
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
9,474 |
|
(Increase) decrease in other equity securities |
|
|
(14,785 |
) |
|
|
4,224 |
|
Net cash inflow on acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,184,563 |
) |
|
|
(2,165,460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
|
|
(758,078 |
) |
|
|
1,723,172 |
|
Net increase in loans payable |
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Net increase in federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
361,092 |
|
|
|
232,290 |
|
Net FHLB advances taken (paid) |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
(117,000 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(43,066 |
) |
|
|
(49,633 |
) |
Issuance of preferred stock and associated warrant |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
Other financing activities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
799,956 |
|
|
|
2,088,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(189,611 |
) |
|
|
66,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
405,733 |
|
|
|
378,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
216,122 |
|
|
$ |
445,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents include: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
124,131 |
|
|
$ |
151,040 |
|
Money market instruments |
|
|
91,991 |
|
|
|
294,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
216,122 |
|
|
$ |
445,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
7
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Preferred Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
550,100 |
|
|
$ |
550,100 |
|
Issuance of preferred stock Series F |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock discount Series F, net of accretion |
|
|
(22,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
927,374 |
|
|
|
550,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
92,546 |
|
|
|
92,504 |
|
Common stock issued under stock option plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Restricted stock forfeited |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
92,542 |
|
|
|
92,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Paid-In-Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
108,299 |
|
|
|
108,279 |
|
Issuance of common stock warrants |
|
|
25,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued under stock option plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Restricted stock forfeited |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation recognized |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
134,201 |
|
|
|
108,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Surplus |
|
|
299,006 |
|
|
|
286,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
440,777 |
|
|
|
409,978 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(221,985 |
) |
|
|
91,129 |
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
|
|
(12,966 |
) |
|
|
(19,426 |
) |
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock |
|
|
(30,106 |
) |
|
|
(30,207 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock discount Series F |
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
172,625 |
|
|
|
451,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
57,389 |
|
|
|
(25,264 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
15,706 |
|
|
|
(21,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
73,095 |
|
|
|
(47,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,698,843 |
|
|
$ |
1,441,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
8
FIRST BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(165,218 |
) |
|
$ |
24,546 |
|
|
$ |
(221,985 |
) |
|
$ |
91,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities on which an
other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncredit-related impairment portion on debt securities not expected to be sold |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary impairment on debt
securities included in net income |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other unrealized holding gain (loss) arising during the period |
|
|
59,708 |
|
|
|
30,773 |
|
|
|
109,577 |
|
|
|
(17,306 |
) |
Reclassification adjustments for net gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in net income |
|
|
(30,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,385 |
) |
|
|
(6,661 |
) |
Reclassification adjustments for other-than-temporary impairment
on equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income |
|
|
(3,171 |
) |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(5,873 |
) |
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of tax |
|
|
26,713 |
|
|
|
31,578 |
|
|
|
15,706 |
|
|
|
(21,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(138,505 |
) |
|
$ |
56,124 |
|
|
$ |
(206,279 |
) |
|
$ |
69,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
9
FIRST BANCORP
PART I NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with the
accounting policies stated in the Corporations Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included
in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Certain
information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP)
have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
SEC and, accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2008, included
in the Corporations 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of
the statement of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods
have been reflected. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The results of operations for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Adoption of new accounting requirements and recently issued but not yet effective accounting
requirements
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance
on financial guarantee insurance contracts requiring that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim
liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This guidance also clarifies how the
accounting and reporting by insurance entities applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts,
including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim
liabilities. FASB authoritative guidance on the accounting for financial guarantee insurance
contracts is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2008, and all interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some disclosures about the
insurance enterprises risk-management activities which are effective since the first interim
period after the issuance of this guidance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
significant impact on the Corporations financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for determining whether instrument
granted in shared-based payment transactions are participating securities. This guidance applies to
entities with outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable
dividends. Furthermore, awards with dividends that do not need to be returned to the entity if the
employee forfeits the award are considered participating securities. Accordingly, under this
guidance unvested share-based payment
10
awards that are considered to be
participating securities should be included in the
computation of earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the two-class method as required by FASB guidance on earnings
per share. FASB guidance on determining whether instruments granted
in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The adoption of
this Statement did not have an impact on the Corporations financial statements since, as of
September 30, 2009, the outstanding unvested shares of restricted stock do not contain rights to
nonforfeitable dividends.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for the accounting of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies. This guidance
amends the provisions related to the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement
and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The
guidance will carry forward the requirement that acquired contingencies in a business combination
be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated
during the allocation period. Otherwise, entities would typically account for the acquired
contingencies based on a reasonable estimate in accordance with FASB guidance on the accounting for
contingencies. This guidance is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this Statement did
not have an impact on the Corporations financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for determining fair value when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased and for
identifying transactions that are not orderly. This guidance relates to determining fair values
when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used represent distressed sales. It
reaffirms what the guidance states is the objective of fair value measurement, that is, to reflect
how much an asset would be sold for in an orderly transaction (as opposed to a distressed or forced
transaction) at the date of the financial statements under current market conditions. Specifically,
it reaffirms the need to use judgment to ascertain if a formerly active market has become inactive
and in determining fair values when markets have become inactive. This guidance is effective for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 on a prospective basis. The
adoption of this Statement did not impact the Corporations fair value methodologies on its
financial assets.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on determining whether an impairment for
investments in debt securities is other-than-temporary (OTTI) and requires an entity to recognize
the credit component of an OTTI of a debt security in earnings and the noncredit component in other
comprehensive income (OCI) when the entity does not intend to sell the security and it is more
likely than not that the entity will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. This
guidance also requires expanded disclosures and became effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009. In connection with this guidance, the Corporation recorded
$0.2 million and $1.3 million for the quarter and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, of OTTI charges through earnings that represents the credit loss of
available-for-sale private label mortgage-backed securities (MBS). This guidance does
11
not amend
existing recognition and measurement guidance related to an OTTI of equity securities. The expanded disclosures related to this new guidance are included in Note 4
Investment Securities.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the disclosure about fair values of
financial instruments, which requires entities to disclose the method(s) and significant
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments, in both interim financial
statements as well as annual financial statements. This guidance became effective for interim
reporting periods ended after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the amended guidance expanded the
Corporations interim financial statement disclosures with regard to the fair value of financial
instruments as presented in Note 18 Fair Value.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on subsequent events, which establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This guidance sets
forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity
should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in
the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (iii) the
disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date. This guidance is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June
15, 2009. The Corporation evaluated subsequent events through November 9, 2009, the
date on which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. There are not any material subsequent event that would require further
disclosure.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the accounting for transfer of
financial assets, which improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of
the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of
financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets.
This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Corporation is evaluating the
impact the adoption of the guidance will have on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the existing guidance on the consolidation of variable
interest, which improves financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities and addresses (i) the effects on certain provisions of the amended guidance as a result
of the elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept in the accounting for transfer
of financial assets guidance and (ii) constituent concerns about the application of certain key
provisions of the guidance, including those in which the accounting and disclosures do not always
provide timely and useful information about an enterprises involvement in a variable interest
entity. This guidance is effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual
reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual
reporting period, and for
12
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. The Corporation is
evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (Codification) is the single source of authoritative nongovernmental
GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are
also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. This guidance is effective for interim and
annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as
described in this guidance. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is
nonauthoritative. Following this guidance, the FASB will not issue new guidance in the form of
Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue
Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their
own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about
the guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification.
In August 2009, the FASB updated the Codification in connection with the fair value
measurement of liabilities to
clarify that in circumstances in which a quoted price
in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to
measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:
1. |
|
A valuation technique that uses: |
|
a. |
|
The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset |
|
|
b. |
|
Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded
as assets |
2. |
|
Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value
measurement. Two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique,
or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement
date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would
receive to enter into the identical liability. |
The update also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting
entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the
existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The update also clarifies
that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical
liability
at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical
liability
when traded as an asset in
an active market when no adjustment to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair
value measurements. This update is effective for the first reporting period (including interim
periods) beginning after issuance. The Corporation is evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption
of this guidance will have on its financial statements.
In September 2009, the FASB updated the Codification to reflect SEC staff pronouncements on
earnings-per-share calculations. According to the update, the SEC staff believes that when a
public company redeems preferred shares, the difference between the fair value of the consideration
transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and the carrying amount on the balance sheet
after issuance costs of the preferred stock should be added to or subtracted from net income before
doing an earnings-per-share calculation. The SECs staff also thinks it is not appropriate to
aggregate preferred
13
shares with different dividend yields when trying to determine whether the
if-converted method is dilutive to the earnings-per-share calculation. As of September 30, 2009,
the Corporation has not been involved in a redemption or induced conversion of preferred stock.
The guidance is effective for new share lending arrangements for interim and annual periods
beginning on or after June 15, 2009. For existing arrangements, the guidance is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009 and must be applied retrospectively for
arrangements outstanding as of the effective date. This guidance did not have an impact on the
Corporations financial statements.
14
2 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The calculations of earnings per common share for the quarters and nine-month periods ended on
September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share information) |
|
|
Net (Loss) Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(165,218 |
) |
|
$ |
24,546 |
|
|
$ |
(221,985 |
) |
|
$ |
91,129 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends (1) |
|
|
(8,356 |
) |
|
|
(10,069 |
) |
|
|
(37,661 |
) |
|
|
(30,207 |
) |
Less: Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders |
|
$ |
(174,689 |
) |
|
$ |
14,477 |
|
|
$ |
(262,741 |
) |
|
$ |
60,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,507 |
|
Average potential common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,569 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earning per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.89 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(2.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.89 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(2.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, preferred stock dividends
include $5.0 million and $7.6 million, respectively, of Series F Preferred Stock cumulative
preferred dividends not declared as of the end of the period. Refer to Note 16 for additional
information related to the Series F Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury in connection
with the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program. |
(Loss) earnings per common share are computed by dividing net (loss) income attributable
to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares issued and outstanding. Net (loss)
income attributable to common stockholders represents net (loss) income adjusted for preferred
stock dividends including dividends declared, accretion of discount on preferred stock issuances
and cumulative dividends related to the current dividend period that have not been declared as of
the end of the period. Basic weighted average common shares outstanding exclude unvested shares of
restricted stock.
Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock
options, unvested shares of restricted stock, and outstanding warrants using the treasury stock
method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from the
exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributable to future services, are used
to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential
shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of
shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Stock options, unvested shares of
restricted stock, and outstanding warrants that result in lower potential shares issued than shares
purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings
per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share. For the
quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, there were 2,546,310 outstanding stock
options, warrants outstanding to purchase 5,842,259 shares of common stock related to the TARP
Capital Purchase Program and 32,216 unvested shares of restricted stock that were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per common share because the Corporation reported a net loss
attributable to common stockholders for such periods. Refer to Note 16 for additional information
related to the issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock and Warrants (as hereinafter defined) under
the TARP Capital Purchase Program. For the quarter and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008,
a total of 3,596,300 and 2,020,600 weighted-average outstanding stock options, respectively, were
not included in the computation of
15
dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect on earnings per share.
3 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN
Between 1997 and January 2007, the Corporation had a stock option plan (the 1997 stock option
plan) that authorized the granting of up to options for 8,696,112 shares of the Corporations
common stock to eligible employees. The options granted under the plan could not exceed 20% of the
number of common shares outstanding. Each option provides for the purchase of one share of common
stock at a price not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option was
granted. Stock options were fully vested upon grant. The maximum term to exercise the options is
ten years. The stock option plan provides for a proportionate adjustment in the exercise price and
the number of shares that can be purchased in the event of a stock dividend, stock split,
reclassification of stock, merger or reorganization and certain other issuances and distributions
such as stock appreciation rights. On January 21, 2007, the 1997 stock option plan expired; all
outstanding awards granted under this plan continue to be in full force and effect, subject to their
original terms. All shares that remained available for grants under the 1997 stock option plan
were cancelled.
On April 29, 2008, the Corporations stockholders approved the First BanCorp 2008 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (the Omnibus Plan). The Omnibus Plan provides for equity-based compensation
incentives (the awards) through the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and other stock-based awards. This plan allows
the issuance of up to 3,800,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments for stock splits,
reorganization and other similar events. The Corporations Board of Directors, upon receiving the
relevant recommendation of the Compensation Committee, has the power and authority to determine
those eligible to receive awards and to establish the terms and conditions of any awards subject to
various limits and vesting restrictions that apply to individual and aggregate awards.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, pursuant to its independent director compensation plan, the
Corporation granted 36,243 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $8.69 under the Omnibus
Plan to the Corporations independent directors. The restrictions on such restricted stock awards
will lapse ratably on an annual basis over a three-year period commencing on December 1, 2009. As
of September 30, 2009, there were 32,216 unvested shares of restricted stock outstanding after the
forfeiture in 2009 of 4,027 shares due to the resignation of an independent director. For the
quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $16,528 and
$69,028, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense related to the aforementioned
outstanding unvested restricted stock awards. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to
these unvested restricted stocks was $237,222 as of September 30, 2009 and is expected to be
recognized over the next 2.2 years.
The Corporation accounted for stock options using the modified prospective method. Under the
modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements for all
share-based payments granted after January 1, 2006. There were no stock options granted during
2009 and 2008 and therefore no compensation expense associated with stock options for the first
nine months of 2009 and 2008.
16
Stock-based compensation accounting guideline requires the Corporation to develop an estimate
of the number of share-based awards that will be forfeited due to employee turnover. Quarterly
changes in the estimated forfeiture rate may have a significant effect on share-based compensation,
as the effect of adjusting the rate for all expense amortization is recognized in the period in
which the forfeiture estimate is changed. If the actual forfeiture rate is higher than the
estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to increase the estimated forfeiture rate,
which will result in a decrease to the expense recognized in the financial statements. If the
actual forfeiture rate is lower than the estimated forfeiture rate, then an adjustment is made to
decrease the estimated forfeiture rate, which will result in an increase to the expense recognized
in the financial statements. When unvested options or shares of restricted stock are forfeited, any
compensation expense previously recognized on the forfeited awards is reversed in the period of the
forfeiture. During 2009, as mentioned above, 4,027 unvested shares of restricted stock were
forfeited resulting in the reversal of $9,722 of previously recorded stock-based compensation
expense.
Stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2009 are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Intrinsic Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Beginning of year
outstanding and
exercisable |
|
|
3,910,910 |
|
|
$ |
12.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled |
|
|
(1,364,600 |
) |
|
|
11.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
outstanding and
exercisable |
|
|
2,546,310 |
|
|
$ |
13.32 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock options granted or exercised during the first nine months of 2009. No
options were granted during the first nine months of 2008. Cash proceeds from 6,000 options
exercised during the first nine months of 2008 amounted to approximately $53,000 and did not have
any intrinsic value.
17
4 INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment Securities Available for Sale
The amortized cost, non-credit loss component of OTTI securities recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (AOCI), gross unrealized gains and losses recorded in AOCI, approximate fair
value, weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available for
sale as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Component |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
of OTTI |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
Recorded in AOCI |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
$ |
1,139,554 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,108 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,148,662 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
|
11,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
11,880 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
4,593 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,639 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
113,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
113,751 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
110,624 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
110,404 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
6,520 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
12,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
15,789 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
15,570 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
|
1,284,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,427 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
1,294,475 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
137,371 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
137,133 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
5.94 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
7.07 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
8.40 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,037,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073,147 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
1,846,386 |
|
|
|
45,743 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,892,128 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,038,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073,245 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
1,846,611 |
|
|
|
45,748 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,892,358 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
383,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,529 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
396,175 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
331,594 |
|
|
|
10,283 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
341,867 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
397,133 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
332,385 |
|
|
|
10,299 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
342,674 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
10.84 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
245,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258,266 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
269,716 |
|
|
|
4,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,394 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
1,435,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476,344 |
|
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
|
1,071,521 |
|
|
|
28,005 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,099,525 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,681,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,734,652 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
1,341,290 |
|
|
|
32,688 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,373,977 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage
Obligations
issued or guaranteed by FHLMC,
FNMA and GNMA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
164,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
162,827 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through
trust certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
121,984 |
|
|
|
29,900 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,086 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
144,217 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30,236 |
|
|
|
113,983 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
3,390,439 |
|
|
|
29,900 |
|
|
|
101,087 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
3,459,943 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
3,664,503 |
|
|
|
88,737 |
|
|
|
30,248 |
|
|
|
3,722,992 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
7.70 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
7.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
7.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities (without
contractual maturity) (1) |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
available for sale |
|
$ |
4,675,304 |
|
|
$ |
29,900 |
|
|
$ |
111,658 |
|
|
$ |
2,073 |
|
|
$ |
4,754,989 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
$ |
3,804,236 |
|
|
$ |
89,370 |
|
|
$ |
31,264 |
|
|
$ |
3,862,342 |
|
|
|
5.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents common shares of other financial institutions in Puerto Rico. |
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no
prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options. The weighted-average yield on investment
securities available for sale is based on amortized cost and, therefore, does not give effect to
changes in fair value. The net unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale and the
non-credit loss component of OTTI are presented as part of AOCI.
The following tables show the Corporations available-for-sale investments fair value and
gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. It also includes debt securities for which an OTTI was recognized and only the
amount related to a credit loss was recognized in earnings:
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
$ |
11,742 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
13,854 |
|
|
$ |
306 |
|
|
$ |
25,596 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GNMA |
|
|
18,348 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,348 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued
or guaranteed by FHLMC, FNMA
and GNMA |
|
|
162,827 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,827 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,828 |
|
|
|
29,900 |
|
|
|
91,828 |
|
|
|
29,900 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
193,007 |
|
|
$ |
1,767 |
|
|
$ |
105,682 |
|
|
$ |
30,206 |
|
|
$ |
298,689 |
|
|
$ |
31,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,288 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
13,288 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
GNMA |
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
FNMA |
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other mortgage pass-through trust certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,685 |
|
|
|
30,236 |
|
|
|
113,685 |
|
|
|
30,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
126,994 |
|
|
$ |
31,107 |
|
|
$ |
128,644 |
|
|
$ |
31,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Investment Securities Held to Maturity
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value,
weighted-average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
average |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
yield% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
U.S. Treasury securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
|
$ |
8,470 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,483 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
8,455 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,489 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of other U.S. Government
sponsored agencies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
7,187 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
945,061 |
|
|
|
5,281 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
949,614 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
18,416 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
18,782 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
17,924 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
18,307 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,170 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,180 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States and Puerto
Rico Government obligations |
|
|
40,306 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
39,622 |
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
976,585 |
|
|
|
5,830 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
981,590 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,803 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
8,338 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8,404 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
|
FNMA certificates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 1 to 5 years |
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,535 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,655 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
After 5 to 10 years |
|
|
567,254 |
|
|
|
26,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593,296 |
|
|
|
4.49 |
|
|
|
686,948 |
|
|
|
9,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,175 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
|
After 10 years |
|
|
24,430 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
25,226 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25,448 |
|
|
|
5.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
602,794 |
|
|
|
26,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629,508 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
728,079 |
|
|
|
9,633 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
737,682 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 10 years |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
645,100 |
|
|
$ |
27,304 |
|
|
$ |
2,009 |
|
|
$ |
670,395 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
$ |
1,706,664 |
|
|
$ |
15,463 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,720,412 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of mortgage-backed securities are based on contractual terms assuming no
prepayments. Expected maturities of investments might differ from contractual maturities because
they may be subject to prepayments and/or call options.
20
The following tables show the Corporations held-to-maturity investments fair value and gross
unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities
have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored
agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
7,187 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,062 |
|
|
$ |
2,009 |
|
|
$ |
13,062 |
|
|
$ |
2,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored
agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,262 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
|
$ |
7,262 |
|
|
$ |
728 |
|
Puerto Rico Government
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,436 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
4,436 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
6,825 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
FHLMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
1,140 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
$ |
20,263 |
|
|
$ |
1,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment for OTTI
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation performs an assessment to determine whether there have
been any events or economic circumstances indicating that a security with an unrealized loss has
suffered OTTI. A debt security is considered impaired if the fair value is less than its amortized
cost basis at the reporting date. The accounting literature requires the Corporation to assess
whether the unrealized loss is other-than-temporary. Prior to April 1, 2009, unrealized losses that
were determined to be temporary were recorded, net of tax, in other comprehensive income for
available-for-sale securities, whereas unrealized losses related to held-to-maturity securities
determined to be temporary were not recognized. Regardless of whether the security was classified
as available for sale or held to maturity, unrealized losses that were determined to be
other-than-temporary were recorded to earnings. An unrealized loss was considered
other-than-temporary if (i) it was probable that
the holder would not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the debt
security, or (ii) the fair value was below the amortized cost of the debt security for a prolonged
period of time and the Corporation did not have the positive intent and ability to hold the
security until recovery or maturity.
In April 2009, the FASB amended the OTTI model for debt securities. Under the new guidance,
OTTI losses must be recognized in earnings if an investor has the intent to sell the debt security
or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of
its amortized cost basis. However, even if an investor does not expect to
21
sell a debt security, it
must evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred.
Under the new guidance, an unrealized loss is generally deemed to be other-than-temporary and
a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the expected future cash flows is less
than the amortized cost basis of the debt security. As a result of the Corporations adoption of
this new guidance, the credit loss component of an OTTI is recorded as a component of Net
impairment losses on investment securities in the accompanying consolidated statement of (loss)
income, while the remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in OCI, provided the
Corporation does not intend to sell the underlying debt security and it is more likely than not
that the Corporation will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery.
Debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies, government-sponsored entities and the U.S.
Treasury accounted for more than 95% of the total available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolio
as of September 30, 2009 and no credit losses are expected, given the explicit and implicit
guarantees provided by the U.S. federal government. The Corporations assessment was concentrated
mainly on private label MBS of approximately $122 million for which the Corporation evaluates
credit losses on a quarterly basis. The Corporation considered the following factors in
determining whether a credit loss exists and the period over which the debt security is expected to
recover:
|
|
|
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than the
amortized cost basis. |
|
|
|
|
Changes in the near term prospects of the underlying collateral of a security such
as changes in default rates, loss severity given default and significant changes in
prepayment assumptions; |
|
|
|
|
The level of cash flows generated from the underlying collateral supporting the
principal and interest payments of the debt securities; and |
|
|
|
|
Any adverse change to the credit conditions and liquidity of the issuer, taking
into consideration the latest information available about the overall financial
condition of the issuer, credit ratings, recent legislation and government actions
affecting the issuers industry and actions taken by the issuer to deal with the
present economic climate. |
22
During the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, the Corporation recorded OTTI losses
on available-for-sale debt securities as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private label MBS |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(32,541 |
) |
Unrealized other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in OCI (1) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
31,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings (2) |
|
$ |
(209 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the noncredit component impact of the OTTI on available-for-sale debt securities |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the credit component of the OTTI on available-for-sale debt securities |
The following table summarizes the roll-forward of credit losses on debt securities held by
the Corporation for which a portion of an OTTI is recognized in OCI:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
Credit losses at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Additions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit losses related to debt securities
for which an OTTI
was not previously recognized |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of credit losses on debt
securities held for which a
portion of an OTTI was recognized in OCI |
|
$ |
1,270 |
|
|
$ |
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, debt securities with OTTI, for which a loss related to credit was
recognized in earnings, consisted entirely of private label mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Private label MBS are mortgage
pass-through certificates bought from R&G Financial Corporation (R&G Financial), a Puerto Rican
financial institution. During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation received from R&G
Financial a payment of $4.2 million to eliminate the 10% recourse provision contained in the
private label MBS. The settlement of the recourse provision was the reason for which the present
value of the expected future cash flows in these private label MBS is less than the amortized cost
of the security.
Private label MBS are collateralized by fixed-rate mortgages on single-family residential
properties in the United States and the interest rate is variable, tied to 3-month LIBOR and
limited to the weighted-average coupon of the underlying collateral. The underlying mortgages are
fixed-rate single family loans with original high FICO scores (over 700) and moderate original
loan-to-value ratios (under 80%), as well as moderate delinquency levels. The Corporation modeled
the cash flow from the fixed-rate mortgage collateral using a static cash flow analysis according
to collateral attributes of the underlying mortgage pool (i.e. loan term, current balance, note
rate, rate adjustment type, rate adjustment frequency, rate caps, others) in combination with
prepayment forecasts obtained from a commercially available prepayment model (ADCO). The variable
cash flow of the security is modeled using the 3-month LIBOR forward curve. Loss assumptions were
driven by the combination of default and loss severity estimates, taking into account loan credit
characteristics (loan-to-value, state, origination date, property
type, occupancy, loan purpose, documentation type, debt-to-income ratio, others) to provide an
estimate of default and loss severity.
For valuation purposes, the Corporation used a discounted cash flow model applying a discount
rate that reflects market observed floating spreads over LIBOR, with a widening spread bias on a
non-rated security and utilizes relevant assumptions such as prepayment rate, default rate, and
loss severity on a loan level basis. Based on the expected cash
23
flows derived from the model, and
since the Corporation does not have the intention to sell the securities and has sufficient capital
and liquidity to hold these securities until a recovery of the fair value occurs, only the credit
loss component was reflected in earnings. Significant assumptions in the valuation of the private
label MBS were as follows as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Range |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Prepayment rate |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
16.78% - 42.21 |
% |
Projected Cumulative Loss Rate |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
0.39% - 8.76 |
% |
For the nine-month periods ended on September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recorded OTTI
of approximately $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, on certain equity securities held in
its available-for-sale investment portfolio related to financial institutions in Puerto Rico.
Management concluded that the declines in value of the securities were other-than-temporary; as
such, the cost basis of these securities was written down to the market value as of the date of the
analysis and is reflected in earnings as a realized loss.
Total proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale during the first nine months of
2009 amounted to approximately $1.0 billion (2008 $389.8 million). The following table
summarizes the realized gains and losses on sales of securities available for sale for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
30,242 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,385 |
|
|
$ |
6,851 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized
security gains
(losses) |
|
$ |
30,242 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58,385 |
|
|
$ |
6,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
5 OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES
Institutions that are members of the FHLB system are required to maintain a minimum investment
in FHLB stock. Such minimum is calculated as a percentage of aggregate outstanding mortgages, and
an additional investment is required that is calculated as a percentage of total FHLB advances,
letters of credit, and the collateralized portion of interest-rate swaps outstanding. The stock is
capital stock issued at $100 par value. Both stock and cash dividends may be received on FHLB
stock.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporation had investments in FHLB stock
with a book value of $77.3 million and $62.6 million, respectively. The net realizable value is a
reasonable proxy for the fair value of these instruments. Dividend income from FHLB stock for the
third quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 amounted to $1.0 million and $2.2
million, respectively, compared to $1.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for the same
periods in 2008.
The Corporation has other equity securities that do not have a readily available fair value.
The carrying value of such securities as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $1.6
million. During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation realized a gain of $3.8 million on the
sale of VISA Class A stock. Also, during the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation realized a
one-time gain of $9.3 million on the mandatory redemption of part of its investment in VISA, Inc.,
which completed its initial public offering (IPO) in March 2008.
25
6 LOAN PORTFOLIO
The following is a detail of the loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Residential mortgage loans, mainly secured by first mortgages |
|
$ |
3,594,154 |
|
|
$ |
3,481,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans |
|
|
1,570,451 |
|
|
|
1,526,995 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
1,542,934 |
|
|
|
1,535,758 |
|
Commercial and Industrial loans (1) |
|
|
4,738,080 |
|
|
|
3,857,728 |
|
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by
real estate mortgages |
|
|
329,492 |
|
|
|
567,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
8,180,957 |
|
|
|
7,488,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
329,418 |
|
|
|
363,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,625,743 |
|
|
|
1,744,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
13,730,272 |
|
|
|
13,077,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(471,484 |
) |
|
|
(281,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
13,258,788 |
|
|
|
12,796,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
25,896 |
|
|
|
10,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
13,284,684 |
|
|
$ |
12,806,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of September 30, 2009, includes $1.2 billion of commercial loans that are secured by real estate but is not dependent upon the real estate for repayment. |
The Corporations primary lending area is Puerto Rico. The Corporations Puerto Rico banking
subsidiary (FirstBank or the Bank) also lends in the U.S. and British Virgin Islands markets
and in the United States (principally in the state of Florida). Of the total gross loan portfolio,
including loans held for sale of $25.9 million as of September 30, 2009, approximately 82% has
regional credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 10% in the United States (mainly in the state of
Florida) and 8% in the Virgin Islands.
The Corporations largest loan concentration to one borrower as of September 30, 2009 amounted
to approximately $689 million in credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government, which
includes a $500 million facility extended to the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. (COFINA
under its Spanish acronym), an instrumentality of the Government of Puerto Rico, and $189 million
extended through a revolving credit facility. The latter is part of the Corporations
participation for up to $300 million in a syndicate structured by another financial institution to
support the Commonwealths 2010 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (TRANs) program.
The next largest loan concentration to one borrower of $329.5 million is with one mortgage loan
originator in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by
individual mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate. During the second quarter of
2009, the Corporation completed a transaction with R&G Financial that involved the purchase of
approximately $205 million of residential mortgage loans that previously served as collateral for a
commercial loan extended to
R&G. The purchase price of the transaction was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off
the loan, thereby significantly reducing the Corporations exposure to a single borrower.
26
7 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
407,746 |
|
|
$ |
222,272 |
|
|
$ |
281,526 |
|
|
$ |
190,168 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
148,090 |
|
|
|
55,319 |
|
|
|
442,671 |
|
|
|
142,435 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(87,001 |
) |
|
|
(27,569 |
) |
|
|
(260,836 |
) |
|
|
(86,557 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
8,123 |
|
|
|
6,393 |
|
Other adjustments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
471,484 |
|
|
$ |
261,170 |
|
|
$ |
471,484 |
|
|
$ |
261,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Carryover of the allowance for loan losses related to a $218 million auto loan portfolio acquired in the third quarter of 2008. |
The allowance for impaired loans is part of the allowance for loan and lease losses. The
allowance for impaired loans covers those loans for which management has determined that it is
probable that the debtor will be unable to pay all the amounts due in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement, and does not necessarily represent loans for which the
Corporation will incur a loss. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, impaired loans and
their related allowance were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Impaired loans with valuation allowance, net of charge-offs |
|
$ |
919,312 |
|
|
$ |
384,914 |
|
Impaired loans without valuation allowance, net of charge-offs |
|
|
606,269 |
|
|
|
116,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,525,581 |
|
|
$ |
501,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans |
|
$ |
149,956 |
|
|
$ |
83,353 |
|
The loans that were classified as impaired during the first nine months of 2009 totaled
approximately $1.2 billion, which required a specific reserve of $114.0 million. Partially
offsetting the increase in impaired loans were charge-offs of approximately $68.8 million related
to the $1.2 billion loans classified as impaired during 2009 and charge-offs of approximately
$115.6 million associated with impaired loans identified prior to 2009. Other decreases include
collateral repossessions (mainly in Florida), loans paid in full, partial payments and loans sold.
Approximately $93.5 million, or 51%, of the charge-offs for impaired loans recorded during 2009
are related to the construction loan portfolio in Florida and $44.2 million, or 24%, are related to
the construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico.
Interest income in the amount of approximately $5.8 million and $20.0 million was recognized
through earnings on impaired loans for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009,
respectively, compared to $3.9 million and $14.4 million, respectively, for the same periods in
2008. Interest income of non-performing loans is recorded on a cash basis through earnings, or on
a cost recovery basis, as conditions warrant. During the
third quarter and first nine months of 2009, interest income of approximately $2.2 million
related to a $665.6 million non-performing portfolio (mainly construction and commercial) was
applied against the related principal balance under the cost-recovery method. The average recorded
investment in impaired loans for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 was $839.7 million and
$257.0 million, respectively.
27
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss
mitigation program in Puerto Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government. Due to
the nature of the borrowers financial condition, the restructure or loan modification through
these program as well as other individual commercial, commercial mortgage loans, construction loans
and residential mortgages in the U.S. mainland fits the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring
(TDR). A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or legal reasons
related to the debtors financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations TDR loans consisted of $89.8
million of residential mortgage loans, $34.0 million commercial and industrial loans, $58.3 million
commercial mortgage loans and $139.1 million of construction loans.
8 DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
One of the market risks facing the Corporation is interest rate risk, which includes the risk
that changes in interest rates will result in changes in the value of the Corporations assets or
liabilities and the risk that net interest income from its loan and investment portfolios will
change in response to changes in interest rates. The overall objective of the Corporations
interest rate risk management activities is to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes
in interest rates.
The Corporation uses various financial instruments, including derivatives, to manage the
interest rate risk primarily related to the value of its medium-term notes and for protection of rising
interest rates in connection with private label MBS.
The Corporation designates a derivative as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or an
economic undesignated hedge when it enters into the derivative contract. As of September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, all derivatives held by the Corporation were considered economic
undesignated hedges. These undesignated hedges are recorded at fair value with the resulting gain
or loss recognized in current earnings.
The following summarizes most of the derivative activities used by the Corporation in managing
interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to
receive cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value
increases as the reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate
cap agreements for protection against rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest
rate on certain private label mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the
Corporations commercial loans to other financial institutions is generally a variable rate
limited to the weighted-average coupon of the pass-through certificate or referenced
residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual servicing fee.
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange
of fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the
underlying notional principal amount. As of September 30, 2009, most of the interest rate
swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising interest rates. In the past,
interest rate swaps volume was much higher since they
28
were used to convert fixed-rate
brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate and
mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans. However, most of these
interest rate swaps were called during 2009, in the face of lower interest rate levels, and
as a consequence the Corporation exercised its call option on the swapped-to-floating
brokered CDs. Similar to unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in fair value,
net interest settlements on interest rate swaps are recorded as an adjustment to interest
income or interest expense depending on whether an asset or liability is being economically
hedged.
Indexed options Indexed options are generally over-the-counter (OTC) contracts
that the Corporation enters into in order to receive the appreciation of a specified Stock
Index (e.g., Dow Jones Industrial Composite Stock Index) over a specified period in
exchange for a premium paid at the contracts inception. The option period is determined by
the contractual maturity of the notes payable tied to the performance of the Stock Index.
The credit risk inherent in these options is the risk that the exchange party may not
fulfill its obligation.
To satisfy the needs of its customers, the Corporation may enter into non-hedging
transactions. On these transactions, generally, the Corporation participates as a buyer in one of
the agreements and as the seller in the other agreement under the same terms and conditions.
In addition, the Corporation enters into certain contracts with embedded derivatives that do
not require separate accounting as these are clearly and closely related to the economic
characteristics of the host contract. When the embedded derivative possesses economic
characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the
host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or non-hedging
derivative instrument.
29
The following table summarizes the notional amounts of all derivative instruments as of
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amounts |
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Economic undesignated hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate
brokered certificates of deposit, notes payable and loans |
|
$ |
80,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,184,820 |
|
Written interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
102,746 |
|
|
|
128,043 |
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
233,841 |
|
|
|
276,400 |
|
Equity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits and notes payable |
|
|
53,515 |
|
|
|
53,515 |
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock
market on embedded stock index options |
|
|
53,515 |
|
|
|
53,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523,691 |
|
|
$ |
1,696,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative instruments and the location in
the Statement of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Financial Condition |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Location |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Economic undesignated hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements used to hedge fixed-rate
brokered CDs, notes payable and loans |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
$ |
5,649 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
$ |
6,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,188 |
|
Written interest rate cap agreements |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Purchased interest rate cap agreements |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written options on stock index deposits |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Embedded written options on stock index notes payable |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
Purchased options used to manage exposure to the stock
market on embedded stock index options |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,066 |
|
|
$ |
8,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,335 |
|
|
$ |
8,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
The following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Income
for the quarters and nine-month periods ended on September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (loss) |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Interest rate contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
used to hedge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs |
|
Interest Expense on Deposit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,667 |
|
|
$ |
(5,236 |
) |
|
$ |
31,219 |
|
Notes payable |
|
Interest Expense on Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
Loans |
|
Interest Income on Loans |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written and purchased interest
rate cap agreements |
|
Interest Income on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mortgage-backed securities |
|
Investment Securities |
|
|
(1,028 |
) |
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
Written and purchased interest
rate cap agreements loans |
|
Interest Income on Loans |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded written and purchased
options on stock index deposits |
|
Interest Expense on Deposits |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
Embedded written and purchased |
|
Interest Expense on Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
options on stock index notes |
|
Payable and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
payable |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gain (Loss) on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,498 |
) |
|
$ |
4,143 |
|
|
$ |
(2,739 |
) |
|
$ |
30,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. As is the
case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function
of the financial markets expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates.
Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the
yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates in the future.
The unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of derivatives that economically hedge certain
callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes are partially offset by unrealized gains and losses on
the valuation of such economically hedged liabilities measured at fair value. The Corporation
includes the gain or loss on those economically hedged liabilities (brokered CDs and medium-term
notes) in the same line item as the offsetting loss or gain on the related derivatives as set
forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) / Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
measured at fair |
|
Net |
|
Gain |
|
measured at fair |
|
Net |
(In thousands) |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain |
Interest expense on Deposits |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
5,669 |
|
|
$ |
(791 |
) |
|
$ |
4,878 |
|
Interest expense on Notes
Payable and Other
Borrowings |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(1,576 |
) |
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) / Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
measured at fair |
|
Net |
|
Gain |
|
measured at fair |
|
Net |
(In thousands) |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain / (Loss) |
|
on Derivatives |
|
value |
|
Gain |
Interest expense on Deposits |
|
$ |
(5,317 |
) |
|
$ |
8,696 |
|
|
$ |
3,379 |
|
|
|
31,071 |
|
|
|
(21,886 |
) |
|
$ |
9,185 |
|
Interest expense on Notes
Payable and Other
Borrowings |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(3,177 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
31
A summary of interest rate swaps as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pay fixed/receive floating: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
80,074 |
|
|
$ |
78,855 |
|
Weighted-average receive rate at period end |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
Weighted-average pay rate at period end |
|
|
6.52 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
Floating rates range from 167 to 252 basis
points over 3-month LIBOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive fixed/pay floating (generally
used to economically
hedge fixed-rate brokered CDs and notes payable): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,105,965 |
|
Weighted-average receive rate at period end |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
Weighted-average pay rate at period end |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
During the first half of 2009, all of the $1.1 billion of interest rate swaps that
economically hedge brokered CDs were called by the counterparties, mainly due to lower levels of
3-month LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps, the Corporation exercised its
call option on the approximately $1.1 billion swapped-to- floating brokered CDs. The Corporation
recorded a net loss of $3.5 million as a result of these transactions resulting from the reversal
of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation has not entered into any derivative instrument
containing credit-risk-related contingent features.
32
9 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
Goodwill as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 amounted to $28.1 million recognized
as part of Other Assets. The goodwill resulted primarily from the acquisition of Ponce General
Corporation in 2005. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. Goodwill impairment
analysis will be conducted during the fourth quarter of 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of core
deposit intangibles was $41.8 million and $24.5 million, respectively, recognized as part of Other
Assets in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (December 31, 2008 $45.8 million
and $21.8 million, respectively). During the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30,
2009, the amortization expense of core deposits amounted to $0.8 million and $2.7 million,
respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for the comparable periods
in 2008. As a result of an impairment evaluation of core deposit intangibles, there was an
impairment charge of $4.0 million recognized during the first half of 2009 related to core deposits
in FirstBank Florida attributable to decreases in the base of core deposits acquired.
10 DEPOSITS
The following table summarizes deposit balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Non-interest bearing checking account deposits |
|
$ |
695,928 |
|
|
$ |
625,928 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
1,702,333 |
|
|
|
1,288,179 |
|
Interest-bearing checking accounts |
|
|
946,750 |
|
|
|
726,731 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
1,459,681 |
|
|
|
1,986,770 |
|
Brokered certificates of deposit (includes $0 and $1,150,959
measured at fair value as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008,
respectively) |
|
|
7,494,098 |
|
|
|
8,429,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,298,790 |
|
|
$ |
13,057,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest expense on deposits includes the market valuation of interest rate swaps that
economically hedge brokered CDs, the related interest exchanged, the amortization of broker
placement fees related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value and changes in the fair value of
callable brokered CDs measured at fair value.
33
The following are the components of interest expense on deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Interest expense on deposits |
|
$ |
66,876 |
|
|
$ |
96,111 |
|
|
$ |
232,876 |
|
|
$ |
299,303 |
|
Amortization of broker placement fees (1) |
|
|
5,288 |
|
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
17,434 |
|
|
|
10,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits excluding net
unrealized gain on
derivatives and brokered CDs measured at fair value |
|
|
72,164 |
|
|
|
99,967 |
|
|
|
250,310 |
|
|
|
310,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on derivatives and brokered CDs
measured at fair value |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4,878 |
) |
|
|
(3,379 |
) |
|
|
(9,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on deposits |
|
$ |
72,163 |
|
|
$ |
95,089 |
|
|
$ |
246,931 |
|
|
$ |
301,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Related to brokered CDs not measured at fair value. |
Total interest expense on deposits includes net cash settlements on interest rate swaps that
economically hedge brokered CDs that for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 amounted to
net interest realized of $5.5 million ($0 for the third quarter of 2009), compared $30.2 million
($10.3 million for the third quarter of 2008), for the comparable period in 2008. As of September
30, 2009, there were no interest rate swap agreements outstanding that hedged brokered CDs since all
of them were called by the counterparties during 2009. Refer to Note 8 for additional information.
11 LOANS PAYABLE
As of September 30, 2009, loans payable consisted of $700 million in short-term borrowings
under the FED Discount Window Program bearing interest at 0.25%. The Corporation participates in
the Borrower-in-Custody (BIC) Program of the FED. Through the BIC Program, a broad range of
loans (including commercial, consumer and mortgages) may be pledged as collateral for borrowings
through the FED Discount Window. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had an unused capacity
of approximately $1.0 billion on this credit facility based on collateral pledged at the FED,
including the haircut reflecting the perceived risk associated with holding the collateral.
12 SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements) consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Repurchase agreements, interest ranging from 0.21% to 5.39%
(2008 2.29% to 5.39%) |
|
$ |
3,782,134 |
|
|
$ |
3,421,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Repurchase agreements mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
One to thirty days |
|
$ |
794,634 |
|
Over thirty to ninety days |
|
|
100,000 |
|
Over ninety days to one year |
|
|
487,500 |
|
One to three years |
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
Three to five years |
|
|
700,000 |
|
Over five years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,782,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the securities underlying such agreements were
delivered to the dealers with whom the repurchase agreements were transacted.
Repurchase agreements as of September 30, 2009, grouped by counterparty, were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
Counterparty |
|
Amount |
|
|
(In Months) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
$ |
1,479,684 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Dean Witter / Morgan Stanley |
|
|
627,450 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Barclays Capital |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
JP Morgan |
|
|
475,000 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
UBS Financial Services, Inc. |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,782,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (FHLB)
Following is a summary of the advances from the FHLB:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Fixed-rate advances from FHLB, with a weighted-average
interest rate of 2.76% (2008 3.09%) |
|
$ |
1,200,440 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Advances from FHLB mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One to thirty days |
|
$ |
210,000 |
|
Over thirty to ninety days |
|
|
12,000 |
|
Over ninety days to one year |
|
|
143,000 |
|
One to three years |
|
|
617,000 |
|
Three to five years |
|
|
218,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,200,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had additional capacity of approximately $355
million on this credit facility based on collateral pledged at the FHLB, including the haircut
reflecting the perceived risk associated with holding the collateral.
14 NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Callable step-rate notes, bearing step increasing interest
from 5% to 7% (5.50% as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008)
maturing on October 18, 2019, measured at fair value under SFAS 159 |
|
$ |
13,140 |
|
|
$ |
10,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) linked principal
protected notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A maturing on February 28, 2012 |
|
|
6,362 |
|
|
|
6,245 |
|
|
Series B maturing on May 27, 2011 |
|
|
7,029 |
|
|
|
6,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,531 |
|
|
$ |
23,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034,
interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.75%
over 3-month LIBOR (3.04% as of September 30, 2009
and 4.62% as of December 31, 2008) |
|
$ |
103,093 |
|
|
$ |
103,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due in 2034,
interest-bearing at a floating-rate of 2.50%
over 3-month LIBOR (2.79% as of September 30, 2009
and 4.00% as of December 31, 2008) |
|
|
128,866 |
|
|
|
128,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
231,959 |
|
|
$ |
231,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
16 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Common stock
The Corporation has 250,000,000 authorized shares of common stock with a par value of $1 per
share. As of September 30, 2009 there were 102,440,522 shares
issued (December 31, 2008
102,444,549) and 92,542,722 shares outstanding (December 31, 2008 92,546,749). In February
2009, the Corporations Board of Directors declared a first quarter cash dividend of $0.07 per
common share, which was paid on March 31, 2009 to common
stockholders of record on March 15, 2009,
and in May 2009 declared a second quarter dividend of $0.07 per
common share, which was paid on June
30, 2009 to common stockholders of record on June 15, 2009. On July 30, 2009, the Corporation
announced the suspension of common and preferred dividends effective with the preferred dividend
for the month of August 2009.
Stock repurchase plan and treasury stock
The Corporation has a stock repurchase program under which from time to time it repurchases
shares of common stock in the open market and holds them as treasury stock. No shares of common
stock were repurchased during 2009 and 2008 by the Corporation. As of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, of the total amount of common stock repurchased, 9,897,800 shares were held as
treasury stock and were available for general corporate purposes.
Preferred stock
The Corporation has 50,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock with a par value of $1,
redeemable at the Corporations option subject to certain terms. This stock may be issued in series
and the shares of each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board
of Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular series. As of September 30, 2009, the
Corporation has five outstanding series of non- convertible non-cumulative preferred stock: 7.125%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series A; 8.35% non-cumulative perpetual
monthly income preferred stock, Series B; 7.40% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred
stock, Series C; 7.25% non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series D; and 7.00%
non-cumulative perpetual monthly income preferred stock, Series E, which trade on the NYSE. The
liquidation value per share is $25. Annual dividends of $1.75 per share (Series E), $1.8125 per
share (Series D), $1.85 per share (Series C), $2.0875 per share (Series B) and $1.78125 per share
(Series A) are payable monthly, if declared by the Board of Directors. Dividends declared on the
non-convertible non-cumulative preferred stock for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008 amounted
to $23.5 million and $30.2 million, respectively.
In January 2009, in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program, established as part of
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury
400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series F, $1,000 liquidation
preference value per share. The Series F Preferred Stock has a call feature after three years. In
connection with this investment, the Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a 10-year warrant
(the Warrant) to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the Corporations common stock at an exercise price
of $10.27 per share. The
37
Corporation registered the Series F Preferred Stock, the Warrant and the shares of common
stock underlying the Warrant for sale under the Securities Act of 1933. The allocated carrying
values of the Series F Preferred Stock and the Warrant on the date of issuance (based on the
relative fair values) were $374.2 million and $25.8 million, respectively. The Cox-Rubinstein
binomial model was used to estimate the value of the Warrant with a strike price calculated,
pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Treasury, based on the average closing
prices of the common stock on the 20 trading days ending the last day prior to the date of approval
to participate in the Program. No credit risk was assumed given the Corporations availability of
authorized, but un-issued common shares; as well as its intention of reserving sufficient shares to
satisfy the exercise of the warrants. The volatility parameter input was the historical 5-year
common stock price volatility. The Series F Preferred Stock will accrete to the redemption price
of $400 million over five years.
The Series F Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital. Cumulative dividends on
the Series F Preferred Stock accrue on the liquidation preference amount on a quarterly basis at a
rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum, but will
only be paid when, as and if declared by the Corporations Board of Directors out of assets legally
available therefore. The Series F Preferred Stock ranks pari passu with the Corporations existing
Series A through E, in terms of dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution
and winding up of the Corporation. The Purchase Agreement relating to this issuance contains limitations on
the payment of dividends on common stock, including limiting regular quarterly cash dividends to an
amount not exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount publicly
announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which is $0.07 per share. For the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, preferred stock dividends of Series F Preferred Stock
amounted to $14.2 million, including $7.6 million of cumulative preferred dividends not declared as
of the end of the period.
The Warrant has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time. The exercise price and the
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject to certain anti-dilution
adjustments.
The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant could
affect the Corporations current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying
the warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporations shares of common stock as of
September 30, 2009); |
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of
common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive. |
As
mentioned above, on July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced the suspension of dividends
for common and all its outstanding series of preferred stock. This suspension was effective with
the dividends for the month of August 2009 on the Corporations five outstanding series of
non-cumulative preferred stock and dividends for the Corporations outstanding Series F Cumulative
Preferred Stock and the Corporations common stock.
38
17 INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable
U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income
from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation
for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its
income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business within the United States. Any such tax paid is creditable, within certain
conditions and limitations, against the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation
is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on its income from sources within that jurisdiction.
Any such tax paid is also creditable against the Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability, subject
to certain conditions and limitations.
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (PR Code), First BanCorp is
subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009 the Puerto Rico Government approved Act
No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Governments
fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the
imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to
corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an
increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. This temporary measure is effective
for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The PR Code also
includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporations regular income tax
liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate
mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and
Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through International Banking Entities (IBEs) of
the Corporation and the Bank and through the Banks subsidiary FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in
which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation.
Under the Act, all IBEs are subject to a special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject
to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that
commence after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas
Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides
for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs
that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs net
income exceeds 20% of the banks total net taxable income.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized an income tax
expense of $1.2 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $21.0 million recorded for the same
period in 2008. The recognition of an income tax expense for 2009 mainly resulted from a non-cash
charge of approximately $152.2 million to increase the valuation allowance for the Corporations
deferred tax asset. Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a
valuation allowance should be recorded against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration
of all available evidence, using a more likely than not realization standard. The valuation
allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence
that
39
can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting
for income taxes guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to
realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences,
future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies.
In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a significant negative factor was
that the Corporations banking subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico is in a three-year historical
cumulative loss as of the end of the third quarter of 2009, mainly as a result of charges to the
provision for loan and lease losses during 2009 arising from the impact of the economic downturn.
This, combined with uncertain near-term market and economic conditions, reduced the Corporations
ability to rely on projections of future taxable income in assessing the realization of its
deferred tax assets and resulted in the increase of the valuation allowance to $157 million as of
September 30, 2009. Management however, has also concluded that $108.0 million of the deferred tax
assets will be realized. In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management has
considered all four sources of taxable income mentioned above and has identified several
tax-planning strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset
amount. Management will continue reassessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets in
future periods. If future events differ from managements September 30, 2009 assessment,
additional valuation allowance may need to be established which may have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations results of operations. Similarly, to the extent the realization of a
portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes more likely than not based on changes in circumstances
(such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant changes), a reversal of that
portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be recorded.
The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact on the Corporations
liquidity, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits
or other deferred tax assets in the future. The increase in the valuation allowance is not a
result of a change in managements view of the Corporations near or long-term outlook.
Partially offsetting the impact of the increase in the valuation allowance, was the reversal
of approximately $19 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (UTBs) as further discussed below. The
income tax provision in 2009 was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax amounts as a result
of the aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates. The effect of a higher temporary
statutory tax rate over the normal statutory tax rate resulted in an additional income tax benefit
of $9.8 million for the first nine months of 2009 that was partially offset by an income tax
provision of $5.6 million related to the special 5% tax on the operations FirstBank Overseas
Corporation. Deferred tax amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the change in the income tax
rate considering the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which
the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or realized.
As of September 30, 2009, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of $157
million, amounted to $108.0 million compared to $128.0 million as of December 31, 2008.
40
In June 2006, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that prescribes a comprehensive model for
the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of income tax
uncertainties with respect to positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Under
the authoritative accounting guidance, income tax benefits are recognized and measured based upon a
two-step model: 1) a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its
technical merits in order to be recognized, and 2) the benefit is measured as the largest dollar
amount of that position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon settlement. The
difference between the benefit recognized in accordance with this model and the tax benefit claimed
on a tax return is referred to as an UTB.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs by $10.8 million and related
accrued interest of $5.3 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2004
taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all possible income and
withholding tax deficiencies related to taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of
such agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of 2009 the remaining UTBs and
related interest by approximately $2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury in connection with the conclusion of the tax audit. There were no UTBs
outstanding as of September 30, 2009. The beginning UTB balance of $15.6 million as of December
31, 2008 (excluding accrued interest of $6.8 million) reconciles to the ending balance in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of the Change in Unrecognized Tax Benefits |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
15,600 |
|
Increases related to positions taken during prior years |
|
|
173 |
|
Decreases related to positions taken during prior years |
|
|
(317 |
) |
Expiration of statute of limitations |
|
|
(10,733 |
) |
Audit settlement |
|
|
(4,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation classified all interest and penalties, if any, related to tax uncertainties as
income tax expense. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporations accrual for interest that relates to
tax uncertainties amounted to $6.8 million. As of
December 31, 2008, there was no need to accrue for
the payment of penalties. For the nine-month period ended on September 30, 2009, the total amount
of accrued interest reversed by the Corporation through income tax expense was $6.8 million,
compared to an accrual of $1.3 million recorded as part of income tax expense for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2008. The amount of UTBs may increase or decrease for various reasons,
including changes in the amounts for current tax year positions, the expiration of open income tax
returns due to the expiration of statutes of limitations, changes in managements judgment about
the level of uncertainty, the status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the
addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.
41
18 FAIR VALUE
In
February 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that permits the measurement of
selected eligible financial instruments at fair value at specified election dates. The Corporation
elected to adopt the fair value option for certain of its brokered CDs and medium-term notes.
Fair Value Option
Callable Brokered CDs and Certain Medium-Term Notes
The Corporation elected the fair value option for certain financial liabilities that were
hedged with interest rate swaps that were previously designated for fair value hedge accounting.
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, these liabilities included certain medium-term
notes with a fair value of $13.1 million and $10.1 million, respectively, and principal balance of
$15.4 million recorded in notes payable. As of December 31, 2008, liabilities recognized at fair
value also included callable brokered CDs with an aggregate fair value of $1.15 billion and
principal balance of $1.13 billion, recorded in interest-bearing deposits. Interest paid/accrued
on these instruments is recorded as part of interest expense and the accrued interest is part of
the fair value of the liabilities measured at fair value. Electing the fair value option allows the
Corporation to eliminate the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting (e.g.,
documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing earnings volatility. Interest rate
risk on the callable brokered CDs measured at fair value was economically hedged with callable
interest rate swaps, with the same terms and conditions, until they were all called during 2009.
The Corporation did not elect the fair value option for the vast majority of other brokered CDs
because these are not hedged by derivatives.
Medium-term notes and callable brokered CDs for which the Corporation elected the fair value
option were priced using observable market data in the institutional markets.
Fair Value Measurement
The FASB authoritative guidance for fair value measurement defines fair value as the exchange
price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the
principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy
that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair
value:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Valuations of Level 1 assets and liabilities are obtained from readily available pricing
sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and
liabilities include equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as
certain U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities and corporate debt
securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active markets. |
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Valuations of Level 2 assets and liabilities are based on
observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2
assets and liabilities include (i) mortgage-backed securities for
which the fair value is estimated based on the value of identical
or comparable assets, (ii) debt securities with quoted prices that
are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and
(iii) derivative contracts and financial liabilities (e.g.,
callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes elected to be measured
at fair value) whose value is determined using a pricing model
with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Valuations of Level 3 assets and liabilities are based on
unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial
instruments whose value is determined using pricing models for
which the determination of fair value requires significant
management judgment or estimation. |
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The information about the estimated fair value of financial instruments required by GAAP is
presented hereunder. The aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent
managements estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation.
The estimated fair value is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and matters of
significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in the
underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results. In
addition, the fair value estimates are based on outstanding balances without attempting to estimate
the value of anticipated future business.
43
The following table presents the estimated fair value and carrying value of financial
instruments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Condition |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Condition |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
9/30/2009 |
|
|
9/30/2009 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
12/31/2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks and money
market investments |
|
$ |
216,122 |
|
|
$ |
216,122 |
|
|
$ |
405,733 |
|
|
$ |
405,733 |
|
Investment securities available
for sale |
|
|
4,754,989 |
|
|
|
4,754,989 |
|
|
|
3,862,342 |
|
|
|
3,862,342 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
645,100 |
|
|
|
670,395 |
|
|
|
1,706,664 |
|
|
|
1,720,412 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
78,930 |
|
|
|
78,930 |
|
|
|
64,145 |
|
|
|
64,145 |
|
Loans receivable, including loans
held for sale |
|
|
13,756,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,088,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: allowance for loan and
lease losses |
|
|
(471,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(281,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance |
|
|
13,284,684 |
|
|
|
13,224,724 |
|
|
|
12,806,766 |
|
|
|
12,416,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in assets |
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
8,010 |
|
|
|
8,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
12,298,790 |
|
|
|
12,437,176 |
|
|
|
13,057,430 |
|
|
|
13,221,026 |
|
Loans payable |
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
3,782,134 |
|
|
|
3,966,651 |
|
|
|
3,421,042 |
|
|
|
3,655,652 |
|
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
1,200,440 |
|
|
|
1,248,319 |
|
|
|
1,060,440 |
|
|
|
1,079,298 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
26,531 |
|
|
|
25,178 |
|
|
|
23,274 |
|
|
|
18,755 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
86,494 |
|
|
|
231,914 |
|
|
|
81,170 |
|
Derivatives, included in liabilties |
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial
liabilities for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets / Liabilities |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
at Fair Value |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
at Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
4,662,332 |
|
|
$ |
92,086 |
|
|
$ |
4,754,989 |
|
|
$ |
2,217 |
|
|
$ |
3,746,142 |
|
|
$ |
113,983 |
|
|
$ |
3,862,342 |
|
Derivatives, included in assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,250 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
8,010 |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150,959 |
|
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,141 |
|
Derivatives, included in liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended |
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant |
|
|
September 30, 2009, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant |
|
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
in Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
in Fair Value |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Losses and |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gains and |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Losses and |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
Losses and |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Losses and |
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
included in |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
and Interest |
|
|
|
included |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
included |
|
|
Expense included |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
|
in Interest |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
included in |
|
|
in Interest |
|
|
in Interest |
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
on Notes |
|
|
Current-Period |
|
|
Expense on |
|
|
Expense on |
|
|
Current-Period |
|
(In thousands) |
|
on Deposits(1) |
|
|
Payable(1) |
|
|
Earnings(1) |
|
|
Deposits(1) |
|
|
Notes Payable(1) |
|
|
Earnings(1) |
|
Callable brokered CDs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,637 |
) |
|
|
(3,637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,788 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,788 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,068 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,637 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2009 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $10.8 million
and interest expense on medium-term notes of $0.2 million and $0.6 million for
the quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been
elected to be carried at fair value are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income based
on their contractual coupons. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Quarter Ended |
|
|
Changes in Fair Value for the Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant |
|
|
September 30, 2008, for items Measured at Fair Value Pursuant |
|
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
to Election of the Fair Value Option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
in Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
in Fair Value |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gains and |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Losses and |
|
|
Gains and |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Losses and |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
(Losses) Gains |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(Losses) Gains |
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
included in |
|
|
and Interest |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
and Interest |
|
|
|
included |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
included |
|
|
included |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
|
in Interest |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
included in |
|
|
in Interest |
|
|
in Interest |
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
Expense |
|
|
on Notes |
|
|
Current-Period |
|
|
Expense on |
|
|
Expense on |
|
|
Current Period |
|
(In thousands) |
|
on Deposits(1) |
|
|
Payable(1) |
|
|
Earnings(1) |
|
|
Deposits(1) |
|
|
Notes Payable(1) |
|
|
Earnings(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable brokered CDs |
|
$ |
(22,841 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(22,841 |
) |
|
$ |
(122,833 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(122,833 |
) |
Medium-term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(22,841 |
) |
|
$ |
749 |
|
|
$ |
(22,092 |
) |
|
$ |
(122,833 |
) |
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
|
$ |
(121,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value for the quarter and nine-month period ended
September 30, 2008 include interest expense on callable brokered CDs of $22.1 million, and $100.9 million, respectively, and interest expense on
medium-term notes of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Interest expense on callable brokered CDs and medium-term notes that have been
elected to be carried at fair value are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income based
on their contractual coupons.
|
The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the quarters and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended September 30, 2009) |
|
|
(Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2009) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives(1) |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale(2) |
|
|
Derivatives(1) |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
3,514 |
|
|
$ |
96,568 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
113,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains or (losses) (realized / unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
1,707 |
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,963 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
|
$ |
92,086 |
|
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
|
$ |
92,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities. |
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
Total Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
(Quarter Ended September 30, 2008) |
|
|
(Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2008) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives(1) |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale(2) |
|
|
Derivatives(1) |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
5,982 |
|
|
$ |
115,190 |
|
|
$ |
5,102 |
|
|
$ |
133,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains or (losses) (realized / unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
4,544 |
|
|
$ |
109,726 |
|
|
$ |
4,544 |
|
|
$ |
109,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts related to the valuation of interest rate cap agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts mostly related to certain private label mortgage-backed securities. |
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains and losses recorded in earnings
for the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 for Level 3 assets and
liabilities that are still held as of the end of each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale |
|
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating
to assets still held at
reporting date (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest income on investment securities |
|
|
(1,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,047 |
) |
|
$ |
(209 |
) |
|
$ |
1,707 |
|
|
$ |
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unrealized gains of $1.6 million and $0.3 million on Level 3
available-for-sale securities were recognized as part of comprehensive income
for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized |
|
|
Changes in Unrealized |
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Securities Available For Sale |
|
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at
reporting date (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest income on investment securities |
|
|
(1,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net impairment losses on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,438 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(558 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unrealized loss of $1.2 million and of $8.8 million on Level 3
available-for-sale securities was recognized as part of comprehensive income
for the quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, respectively. |
Additionally, fair value is used on a non-recurring basis to evaluate certain assets in
accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of
lower-of-cost-or-market accounting (e.g., loans held for sale carried at the lower of cost or fair
value and repossessed assets) or write-downs of individual assets (e.g., goodwill, loans).
As of September 30, 2009, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets
recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses recorded for |
|
Losses recorded for |
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2009 |
|
the Quarter Ended |
|
the Nine-month period |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
994,441 |
|
|
$ |
72,077 |
|
|
$ |
202,645 |
|
Other Real Estate Owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,493 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
|
|
8,260 |
|
Core deposit intangible (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was
generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices
in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the
collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration
prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations
but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption
rates), which are not market observable. Losses are related to market valuation adjustments after the transfer from the loan to the Other Real Estate Owned
(OREO) portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount represents core deposit intangible of FirstBank Florida. The
impairment was generally measured based on internal information about decreases in the base of core deposits acquired upon the acquisition of
FirstBank Florida. |
46
As of September 30, 2008, impairment or valuation adjustments were recorded for assets
recognized at fair value on a non-recurring basis as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses recorded for |
|
Losses recorded for |
|
|
Carrying value as of September 30, 2008 |
|
the Quarter Ended |
|
the Nine-month period |
(In thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
237,388 |
|
|
$ |
36,707 |
|
|
$ |
61,213 |
|
Other Real Estate Owned (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,422 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
2,892 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly impaired commercial and construction loans. The impairment was
generally measured based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair values are derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices
in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the
collateral (e.g. absorption rates), which are not market observable. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value is derived from appraisals that take into consideration
prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations
but adjusted for specific characteristics and assumptions of the properties (e.g. absorption
rates), which are not market observable. Losses are related to market
valuation
adjustments after the transfer from the loan to the OREO portfolio. |
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments for
which an estimated fair value is presented as well as for instruments for which the Corporation has
elected the fair value option. The estimated fair value was calculated using certain facts and
assumptions, which vary depending on the specific financial instrument.
Cash and due from banks and money market investments
The carrying amount of cash and due from banks and money market investments are reasonable
estimates of their fair value. Money market investments include held-to-maturity U.S. Government
obligations, which have a contractual maturity of three months or less. The fair value of these
securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets that incorporate the risk of
nonperformance.
Investment securities available for sale and held to maturity
The fair value of investment securities is the market value based on quoted market prices,
when available, or market prices for identical or comparable assets that are based on observable
market parameters including benchmark yields, reported trades, quotes from brokers or dealers,
issuer spreads, bids offers and reference data including market research operations. Observable
prices in the market already consider the risk of nonperformance. If listed prices or quotes are
not available, fair value is based upon models that use unobservable inputs due to the limited
market activity of the instrument, as is the case with certain private label mortgage-backed
securities held by the Corporation. Refer to Note 4 for additional information about the fair value
of private label mortgage-backed securities.
Other equity securities
Equity or other securities that do not have a readily available fair value are stated at the
net realizable value which management believes is a reasonable proxy for their fair value. This
category is principally composed of stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with FHLB
regulatory requirements. Their realizable value equals their cost as these shares can be freely
redeemed at par.
47
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale
The fair value of all loans was estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest
rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality and with adjustments
that the Corporations management believes a market participant would consider in determining fair
value. Loans were classified by type such as commercial, residential mortgage, credit cards and
automobile. These asset categories were further segmented into fixed- and adjustable-rate
categories. The fair values of performing fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans were calculated by
discounting expected cash flows through the estimated maturity date. Loans with no stated maturity,
like credit lines, were valued at book value. Prepayment assumptions were considered for
non-residential loans. For residential mortgage loans, prepayment estimates were based on
prepayment experiences of generic U.S. mortgage-backed securities pools with similar
characteristics (e.g. coupon and original term) and adjusted based on the Corporations historical
data. Discount rates were based on the Treasury and LIBOR/Swap Yield Curves at the date of the
analysis, and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses and liquidity.
For impaired collateral dependent loans, the impairment was primarily measured based on the
fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices
in observable transactions involving similar assets in similar locations.
Deposits
The estimated fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts, which are deposits with no
defined maturities, equals the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. For deposits with
stated maturities, but that reprice at least quarterly, the fair value is also estimated to be the
recorded amounts at the reporting date.
The fair values of retail fixed-rate time deposits, with stated maturities, are based on the
present value of the future cash flows expected to be paid on the deposits. The cash flows were
based on contractual maturities; no early repayments are assumed. Discount rates were based on the
LIBOR yield curve.
The estimated fair value of total deposits excludes the fair value of core deposit
intangibles, which represent the value of the customer relationship measured by the value of demand
deposits and savings deposits that bear a low or zero rate of interest and do not fluctuate in
response to changes in interest rates.
The fair value of brokered CDs, which are included within deposits, is determined using
discounted cash flow analyses over the full term of the CDs. The valuation uses a Hull-White
Interest Rate Tree approach, an industry-standard approach for valuing instruments with interest
rate call options. The fair value of the CDs is computed using the outstanding principal amount.
The discount rates used are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates. At-the-money implied swaption
volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to calibrate the model to
current market prices. The fair value does not incorporate the risk of nonperformance, since
brokered CDs are generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and insured
by the FDIC.
48
Loans payable
Loans payable consisted of short-term borrowings under the FED Discount Window Program. Due to the
short-term nature of these borrowings, their outstanding balances are estimated to be the fair
value.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Some repurchase agreements reprice at least quarterly, and their outstanding balances are
estimated to be their fair value. Where longer commitments are involved, fair value is estimated
using exit price indications of the cost of unwinding the transactions as of the end of the
reporting period. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are fully collateralized by
investment securities.
Advances from FHLB
The fair value of advances from FHLB with fixed maturities is determined using discounted cash
flow analyses over the full term of the borrowings, using indications of the fair value of similar
transactions. The cash flows assume no early repayment of the borrowings. Discount rates are based
on the LIBOR yield curve. For advances from FHLB that reprice quarterly, their outstanding balances
are estimated to be their fair value. Advances from FHLB are fully collateralized by mortgage loans
and, to a lesser extent, investment securities.
Derivative instruments
The fair value of most of the derivative instruments is based on observable market parameters and
takes into consideration the credit risk component of paying counterparts when appropriate, except
when collateral is pledged. That is, on interest rate swaps, the credit risk of both counterparts
is included in the valuation; and on options and caps, only the sellers credit risk is considered.
The Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach is used to value the option components of derivative
instruments, and discounting of the cash flows is performed using USD dollar LIBOR-based discount
rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the
counterparty and/or the Corporation. Derivatives include interest rate swaps used for protection
against rising interest rates and prior to June 30, 2009 included interest rate swaps to
economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes. For these interest rate swaps, a credit
component was not considered in the valuation since the Corporation has fully collateralized with
investment securities any mark to market loss with the counterparty and if there were market gains
the counterparty had to deliver collateral to the Corporation.
Certain derivatives with limited market activity, as is the case with derivative instruments
named as reference caps, are valued using models that consider unobservable market parameters
(Level 3). Reference caps are used mainly to hedge interest rate risk inherent in private label
mortgage-backed securities, thus are tied to the notional amount of the underlying fixed-rate
mortgage loans originated in the United States. Significant inputs used for fair value
determination consist of specific characteristics such as information used in the prepayment model
which follows the
49
amortizing schedule of the underlying loans, which is an unobservable input. The valuation
model uses the Black formula, which is a benchmark standard in the financial industry. The Black
formula is similar to the Black-Scholes formula for valuing stock options except that the spot
price of the underlying is replaced by the forward price. The Black formula uses as inputs the
strike price of the cap, forward LIBOR rates, volatility estimates and discount rates to estimate
the option value. LIBOR rates and swap rates are obtained from Bloomberg L.P. (Bloomberg) every
day and build zero coupon curve based on the Bloomberg LIBOR/Swap curve. The discount factor is
then calculated from the zero coupon curve. The cap is the sum of all caplets. For each caplet, the
rate is reset at the beginning of each reporting period and payments are made at the end of each
period. The cash flow of each caplet is then discounted from each payment date.
Although most of the derivative instruments are fully collateralized, a credit spread is
considered for those that are not secured in full. The cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit
risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted in an unrealized gain of approximately
$0.7 million as of September 30, 2009, of which an unrealized loss of $1.4 million was recorded in
the nine months of 2009 and an immaterial unrealized gain of $13,000 was recorded in the first nine
months of 2008.
Term notes payable
The fair value of term notes is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis over the full
term of the borrowings. This valuation also uses the Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach to
value the option components of the term notes. The model assumes that the embedded options are
exercised economically. The fair value of medium-term notes is computed using the notional amount
outstanding. The discount rates used in the valuations are based on US dollar LIBOR and swap rates.
At-the-money implied swaption volatility term structure (volatility by time to maturity) is used to
calibrate the model to current market prices and value the cancellation option in the term notes.
For the medium-term notes, the credit risk is measured using the difference in yield curves between
swap rates and a yield curve that considers the industry and credit rating of the Corporation as
issuer of the note at a tenor comparable to the time to maturity of the note and option. The net
loss from fair value changes attributable to the Corporations own credit to the medium-term notes
for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option amounted to $2.9 million for the first
nine months of 2009 and an unrealized gain of $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2008. The
cumulative mark-to-market unrealized gain on the medium-term notes since measured at fair value
attributable to credit risk amounted to $2.8 million as of September 30, 2009.
Other borrowings
Other borrowings consist of junior subordinated debentures. Projected cash flows from the
debentures were discounted using the LIBOR yield curve plus a credit spread. This credit spread was
estimated using the difference in yield curves between Swap rates and a yield curve that considers
the industry and credit rating of the Corporation (US Finance BB) as issuer of the note at a tenor
comparable to the time to maturity of the debentures.
50
19 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Supplemental cash flow information follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash paid for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings |
|
$ |
393,463 |
|
|
$ |
533,281 |
|
Income tax |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to other real estate owned |
|
|
76,677 |
|
|
|
47,046 |
|
Additions to auto repossesion |
|
|
61,107 |
|
|
|
64,885 |
|
Capitalization of servicing assets |
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
Loan securitizations |
|
|
262,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash acquisition of mortgage loans that previously served
as collateral of a commercial loan to a local financial institution |
|
|
205,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
On January 28, 2008, the Corporation completed the acquisition of Virgin Islands
Community Bank (VICB), with operations in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, at a purchase price of
$2.5 million. The Corporation acquired cash of approximately $7.7 million from VICB.
20 SEGMENT INFORMATION
Based upon the Corporations organizational structure and the information provided to the
Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and, to a lesser extent, the Board of Directors, the
operating segments are driven primarily by the Corporations legal entities. As of September 30,
2009, the Corporation had four reportable segments: Commercial and Corporate Banking; Mortgage
Banking; Consumer (Retail) Banking; and Treasury and Investments. There is also an Other category
reflecting other legal entities reported separately on an aggregate basis. Management determined
the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess
where to allocate resources. Other factors such as the Corporations organizational chart, nature
of the products, distribution channels and the economic characteristics of the products were also
considered in the determination of the reportable segments.
Effective July 1, 2009, the operations conducted by FirstBank Florida as a separate entity were merged with and into
FirstBank Puerto Rico, the Corporations main banking subsidiary. Prior to the merger, FirstBank Florida operations were evaluated as a separate legal entity
and included as part of the Other segment category. These operations are now reviewed as part of FirstBank Puerto Rico and the information is segregated
among the aforementioned four reportable business segments. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to
conform to current period presentation. These changes did not have an impact on the previously reported consolidated results of the Corporation.
The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment consists of the Corporations lending and other
services for large customers represented by specialized and middle-market clients and the public
sector. The Commercial and Corporate Banking segment offers commercial loans, including commercial
real estate and construction loans, and other products such as cash management and business
management services. The Mortgage Banking segments operations consist of the origination, sale and
servicing of a variety of residential mortgage loans. The Mortgage Banking segment also acquires
and sells mortgages in the secondary markets. In addition, the Mortgage Banking segment includes
mortgage loans purchased from other local banks and mortgage bankers. The Consumer (Retail) Banking
segment consists of the Corporations consumer lending and deposit-taking activities conducted
mainly through its branch network and loan centers. The Treasury and Investments segment is
responsible for the Corporations investment portfolio and treasury functions executed to
manage and enhance liquidity. This segment loans funds to the Commercial and Corporate
Banking, Mortgage Banking and Consumer (Retail) Banking segments to finance their lending
activities and borrows from those segments. The Consumer (Retail) Banking segment also loans funds
to other segments. The interest rates charged or credited by Treasury and Investments and the
Consumer (Retail) Banking segments are allocated based on market rates. The difference between the
allocated interest income or expense and the
51
Corporations actual net interest income from
centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury and Investments segment. The
Other category is mainly composed of insurance, finance leases and other products.
The accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in Note 1 to
the Corporations financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 contained in the
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Corporation evaluates the performance of the segments based on net interest income after
the estimated provision for loan and lease losses, non-interest income and direct non-interest
expenses. The segments are also evaluated based on the average volume of their interest-earning
assets less the allowance for loan and lease losses.
52
The following table presents information about the reportable segments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Commercial and |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
(Retail) Banking |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
52,828 |
|
|
$ |
39,828 |
|
|
$ |
71,088 |
|
|
$ |
62,067 |
|
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
|
$ |
242,022 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(35,104 |
) |
|
|
17,209 |
|
|
|
(11,961 |
) |
|
|
34,899 |
|
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
17,724 |
|
|
|
37,007 |
|
|
|
59,127 |
|
|
|
4,107 |
|
|
|
11,168 |
|
|
|
129,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(6,920 |
) |
|
|
(13,399 |
) |
|
|
(120,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,847 |
) |
|
|
(148,090 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
7,418 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
34,121 |
|
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
|
49,989 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(10,085 |
) |
|
|
(27,901 |
) |
|
|
(13,189 |
) |
|
|
(1,816 |
) |
|
|
(5,791 |
) |
|
|
(58,782 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,170 |
|
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
(73,391 |
) |
|
$ |
36,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,934 |
|
|
$ |
(27,750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets |
|
$ |
3,568,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,758,365 |
|
|
$ |
7,126,691 |
|
|
$ |
6,279,634 |
|
|
$ |
452,597 |
|
|
$ |
19,186,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
54,116 |
|
|
$ |
46,900 |
|
|
$ |
89,813 |
|
|
$ |
80,050 |
|
|
$ |
17,413 |
|
|
$ |
288,292 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(41,260 |
) |
|
|
20,955 |
|
|
|
(53,540 |
) |
|
|
80,799 |
|
|
|
(6,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
12,856 |
|
|
|
43,434 |
|
|
|
36,273 |
|
|
|
41,599 |
|
|
|
10,459 |
|
|
|
144,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
(10,048 |
) |
|
|
(34,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,107 |
) |
|
|
(55,319 |
) |
Non-interest income (loss) |
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
|
13,871 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(7,020 |
) |
|
|
(27,018 |
) |
|
|
(11,137 |
) |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
|
|
(6,521 |
) |
|
|
(53,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,212 |
|
|
$ |
14,278 |
|
|
$ |
(7,923 |
) |
|
$ |
39,439 |
|
|
$ |
(2,223 |
) |
|
$ |
49,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets |
|
$ |
3,409,521 |
|
|
$ |
1,945,964 |
|
|
$ |
6,467,386 |
|
|
$ |
6,017,000 |
|
|
$ |
499,430 |
|
|
$ |
18,339,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
156,961 |
|
|
$ |
122,788 |
|
|
$ |
223,719 |
|
|
$ |
199,907 |
|
|
$ |
49,750 |
|
|
$ |
753,125 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(110,540 |
) |
|
|
59,888 |
|
|
|
(64,524 |
) |
|
|
134,741 |
|
|
|
(19,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305,283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(371,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
46,421 |
|
|
|
116,579 |
|
|
|
159,195 |
|
|
|
29,365 |
|
|
|
30,185 |
|
|
|
381,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(36,660 |
) |
|
|
(26,352 |
) |
|
|
(367,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,460 |
) |
|
|
(442,671 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
21,502 |
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
60,955 |
|
|
|
10,191 |
|
|
|
103,457 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(31,065 |
) |
|
|
(86,686 |
) |
|
|
(46,539 |
) |
|
|
(5,934 |
) |
|
|
(18,241 |
) |
|
|
(188,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (loss) income |
|
$ |
(14,635 |
) |
|
$ |
25,043 |
|
|
$ |
(250,403 |
) |
|
$ |
84,386 |
|
|
$ |
9,675 |
|
|
$ |
(145,934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets |
|
$ |
3,481,708 |
|
|
$ |
1,818,237 |
|
|
$ |
7,246,471 |
|
|
$ |
6,020,539 |
|
|
$ |
464,652 |
|
|
$ |
19,031,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
158,934 |
|
|
$ |
132,009 |
|
|
$ |
283,207 |
|
|
$ |
217,139 |
|
|
$ |
52,698 |
|
|
$ |
843,987 |
|
Net (charge) credit for transfer of funds |
|
|
(119,993 |
) |
|
|
76,197 |
|
|
|
(168,376 |
) |
|
|
233,649 |
|
|
|
(21,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(366,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
38,941 |
|
|
|
133,935 |
|
|
|
114,831 |
|
|
|
84,757 |
|
|
|
31,221 |
|
|
|
403,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
(8,755 |
) |
|
|
(33,175 |
) |
|
|
(75,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,610 |
) |
|
|
(142,435 |
) |
Non-interest income |
|
|
2,480 |
|
|
|
22,131 |
|
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
15,269 |
|
|
|
12,014 |
|
|
|
55,253 |
|
Direct non-interest expenses |
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
|
|
(82,952 |
) |
|
|
(32,874 |
) |
|
|
(5,331 |
) |
|
|
(19,674 |
) |
|
|
(162,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment income |
|
$ |
10,616 |
|
|
$ |
39,939 |
|
|
$ |
9,421 |
|
|
$ |
94,695 |
|
|
$ |
(1,049 |
) |
|
$ |
153,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earnings assets |
|
$ |
3,294,509 |
|
|
$ |
1,832,448 |
|
|
$ |
6,360,175 |
|
|
$ |
5,569,548 |
|
|
$ |
504,540 |
|
|
$ |
17,561,220 |
|
53
The following table presents a reconciliation of the reportable segment financial information
to the consolidated totals (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (loss) income for segments and other |
|
$ |
(27,750 |
) |
|
$ |
49,783 |
|
|
$ |
(145,934 |
) |
|
$ |
153,622 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(23,995 |
) |
|
|
(28,986 |
) |
|
|
(74,828 |
) |
|
|
(83,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(51,745 |
) |
|
|
20,797 |
|
|
|
(220,762 |
) |
|
|
70,177 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(113,473 |
) |
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
20,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(165,218 |
) |
|
$ |
24,546 |
|
|
$ |
(221,985 |
) |
|
$ |
91,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average earning assets for segments |
|
$ |
19,186,235 |
|
|
$ |
18,339,301 |
|
|
$ |
19,031,607 |
|
|
$ |
17,561,220 |
|
Average non-earning assets |
|
|
1,016,656 |
|
|
|
701,115 |
|
|
|
826,411 |
|
|
|
707,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated average assets |
|
$ |
20,202,891 |
|
|
$ |
19,040,416 |
|
|
$ |
19,858,018 |
|
|
$ |
18,268,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Corporation enters into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal
course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments may
include commitments to extend credit and commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value. As of
September 30, 2009, commitments to extend credit amounted to approximately $1.6 billion and standby
letters of credit amounted to approximately $102.9 million. Commitments to extend credit are
agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any conditions established in
the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses.
Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment
amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of
credit, the Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional
disbursements. In the case of credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can, at
any time and without cause, cancel the unused credit facility. Generally, the Corporations
mortgage banking activities do not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective
borrowers.
The Corporation obtained from GNMA a Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed
securities for approximately $301.5 million. Under this program, as of September 30, 2009, the
Corporation had securitized approximately $262 million of FHA/VA mortgage loan production into GNMA
mortgage-backed securities.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was the counterparty to the Corporation on
certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the
scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under
those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman
and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with
the unpaid net cash settlement due as of September 30, 2009, under the swap agreements, the
Corporation has an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of
2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its
performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value
of pledged securities with Lehman as of September 30,
54
2009 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The position of the Corporation with respect to the recovery of the collateral, after discussion
with its outside legal counsel, is that at all times title to the collateral has been vested in the
Corporation and that, therefore, this collateral should not, for any purpose, be considered
property of the bankruptcy estate available for distribution among Lehmans creditors. In this
regard the Corporation, together with its outside legal counsel, is evaluating courses of action it
may pursue in its attempt to recover the collateral. On January 30, 2009, the Corporation filed a
customer claim with the trustee and at this time the Corporation is unable to determine the timing
of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of
the collateral or its equivalent value. As additional relevant facts become available in future
periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that
the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in
this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing during the
second quarter of 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, First BanCorp and its subsidiaries were defendants in various legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that the final
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial
position or results of operations.
55
22 FIRST BANCORP (Holding Company Only) Financial Information
The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of the Holding
Company only as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and the results of its operations for
the quarters and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
82,790 |
|
|
$ |
58,075 |
|
Money market investments |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at market: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
Investment in FirstBank Puerto Rico, at equity |
|
|
1,827,635 |
|
|
|
1,574,940 |
|
Investment in FirstBank Insurance Agency, at equity |
|
|
7,038 |
|
|
|
5,640 |
|
Investment in Ponce General Corporation, at equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,367 |
|
Investment in PR Finance, at equity |
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust I |
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
Investment in FBP Statutory Trust II |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
6,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,931,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,780,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other borrowings |
|
$ |
231,959 |
|
|
$ |
231,914 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
232,458 |
|
|
|
232,768 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,698,843 |
|
|
|
1,548,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,931,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,780,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on investment securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,072 |
|
Interest income on other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
Dividends from FirstBank Puerto Rico |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
45,786 |
|
|
|
61,872 |
|
Dividends from other subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Other income |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
21,880 |
|
|
|
45,984 |
|
|
|
67,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and other borrowings |
|
|
1,870 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
6,599 |
|
|
|
10,676 |
|
Interest on funding to subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
Recovery for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
8,277 |
|
|
|
11,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss) on investments and impairments |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity
in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
|
17,400 |
|
|
|
37,567 |
|
|
|
55,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
(163,983 |
) |
|
|
7,146 |
|
|
|
(259,549 |
) |
|
|
36,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(165,218 |
) |
|
$ |
24,546 |
|
|
$ |
(221,985 |
) |
|
$ |
91,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except for per share and financial ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
Nine-month period ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Condensed Income Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
242,022 |
|
|
$ |
288,292 |
|
|
$ |
753,125 |
|
|
$ |
843,987 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
112,889 |
|
|
|
143,671 |
|
|
|
371,380 |
|
|
|
440,302 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
129,133 |
|
|
|
144,621 |
|
|
|
381,745 |
|
|
|
403,685 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
148,090 |
|
|
|
55,319 |
|
|
|
442,671 |
|
|
|
142,435 |
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
49,989 |
|
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
103,457 |
|
|
|
55,253 |
|
Non-interest expenses |
|
|
82,777 |
|
|
|
82,376 |
|
|
|
263,293 |
|
|
|
246,326 |
|
(Loss) Income before income taxes |
|
|
(51,745 |
) |
|
|
20,797 |
|
|
|
(220,762 |
) |
|
|
70,177 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(113,473 |
) |
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
(1,223 |
) |
|
|
20,952 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(165,218 |
) |
|
|
24,546 |
|
|
|
(221,985 |
) |
|
|
91,129 |
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
(174,689 |
) |
|
|
14,477 |
|
|
|
(262,741 |
) |
|
|
60,922 |
|
Per Common Share Results: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share basic |
|
$ |
(1.89 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(2.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Net (loss) income per share diluted |
|
$ |
(1.89 |
) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
(2.84 |
) |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Average shares outstanding |
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,507 |
|
Average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,569 |
|
|
|
92,511 |
|
|
|
92,623 |
|
Book value per common share |
|
$ |
8.34 |
|
|
$ |
9.63 |
|
|
$ |
8.34 |
|
|
$ |
9.63 |
|
Tangible book value per common share (1) |
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
9.06 |
|
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
9.06 |
|
Selected Financial Ratios (In Percent): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profitability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Average Assets |
|
|
(3.27 |
) |
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
(1.49 |
) |
|
|
0.67 |
|
Interest Rate Spread (2) |
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
Net Interest Margin (2) |
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
Return on Average Total Equity |
|
|
(35.47 |
) |
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
(15.53 |
) |
|
|
8.51 |
|
Return on Average Common Equity |
|
|
(74.62 |
) |
|
|
6.76 |
|
|
|
(34.94 |
) |
|
|
9.26 |
|
Average Total Equity to Average Total Assets |
|
|
9.22 |
|
|
|
7.39 |
|
|
|
9.60 |
|
|
|
7.81 |
|
Tangible common equity ratio (1) |
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
4.35 |
|
Dividend payout ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44.73 |
|
|
|
(4.93 |
) |
|
|
31.89 |
|
Efficiency ratio (3) |
|
|
46.21 |
|
|
|
51.97 |
|
|
|
54.26 |
|
|
|
53.67 |
|
Asset Quality: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to loans receivable |
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans |
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
175.56 |
|
|
|
219.94 |
|
|
|
175.17 |
|
|
|
177.68 |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
8.39 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
|
8.39 |
|
|
|
2.86 |
|
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable |
|
|
11.21 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
|
|
11.21 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans |
|
|
30.64 |
|
|
|
52.20 |
|
|
|
30.64 |
|
|
|
52.20 |
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans
excluding residential real estate loans |
|
|
42.90 |
|
|
|
103.83 |
|
|
|
42.90 |
|
|
|
103.83 |
|
Other Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Price: End of period |
|
$ |
3.05 |
|
|
$ |
11.06 |
|
|
$ |
3.05 |
|
|
$ |
11.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and loans held for sale |
|
$ |
13,756,168 |
|
|
$ |
13,088,292 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
471,484 |
|
|
|
281,526 |
|
Money market and investment securities |
|
|
5,571,010 |
|
|
|
5,709,154 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
45,395 |
|
|
|
52,083 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
107,955 |
|
|
|
128,039 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
20,081,185 |
|
|
|
19,491,268 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
12,298,790 |
|
|
|
13,057,430 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
5,941,064 |
|
|
|
4,736,670 |
|
Total preferred equity |
|
|
927,374 |
|
|
|
550,100 |
|
Total common equity |
|
|
698,374 |
|
|
|
940,628 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
73,095 |
|
|
|
57,389 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,698,843 |
|
|
|
1,548,117 |
|
|
|
|
1- |
|
Non-gaap measures. Refer to Capital discussion below for additional information of the components and reconciliation of these
measures. |
|
2- |
|
On a tax-equivalent basis and excluding the changes in fair value of derivative instruments and financial liabilities measured at fair
value (see Net Interest Income discussion below for a
reconciliation of this non-gaap measure). |
|
3- |
|
Non-interest expenses to the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. The denominator includes non-recurring income and
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and financial liabilities measured at fair value. |
58
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations relates to the accompanying consolidated unaudited financial statements of First BanCorp
(the Corporation or First BanCorp) and should be read in conjunction with the interim unaudited
financial statements and the notes thereto.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
First BanCorp is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San Juan, Puerto
Rico offering a full range of financial products to consumers and commercial customers through
various subsidiaries. First BanCorp is the holding company of FirstBank Puerto Rico (FirstBank or
the Bank), Grupo Empresas de Servicios Financieros (d/b/a PR Finance Group) and FirstBank
Insurance Agency. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Corporation operates offices in Puerto
Rico, the United States and British Virgin Islands and the State of Florida (USA) specializing in
commercial banking, residential mortgage loan originations, finance leases, personal loans, small
loans, auto loans, vehicle rental and insurance agency services.
OVERVIEW OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
First BanCorps results of operations generally depend primarily upon its net interest income,
which is the difference between the interest income earned on its interest-earning assets,
including investment securities and loans, and the interest expense incurred on its
interest-bearing liabilities, including deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by
various factors, including: the interest rate scenario; the volumes, mix and composition of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; and the re-pricing characteristics of
these assets and liabilities. The Corporations results of operations also depend on the provision
for loan and lease losses, which significantly affected the results for the third quarter and
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, non-interest expenses (such as personnel, occupancy and
other costs), non-interest income (mainly service charges and fees on loans and deposits and
insurance income), the results of its hedging activities, gains (losses) on investments, gains
(losses) on sale of loans, and income taxes.
Net loss for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 amounted to $165.2 million or $1.89 per
diluted common share, compared to net income of $24.5 million or $0.16 per diluted common share for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The Corporations financial performance for the third
quarter of 2009, as compared to the third quarter of 2008, was principally impacted by (i) a
non-cash charge of $152.2 million to increase the deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to the
recent losses, (ii) an increase of $92.8 million in the provision for loan and lease
losses attributable to the increased volume of criticized loans, including non-performing and
impaired loans, that required higher reserves as well as increases in reserve factors to account
for increases in charge-offs and delinquency levels affected by declining real estate values and
deteriorated economic conditions in Puerto Rico and Florida, and the overall growth of the
Corporations loan portfolio, and (iii) a decrease of $15.5 million in net interest income
attributable to lower loan yields, resulting from a significant increase in non-accrual
loans and the repricing of variable-rate construction and commercial loans tied to short-term
indexes. These factors were partially offset by: (i) an increase of $36.1 million in non-interest
income mainly related to a realized gain of $34.3 million on the sale of investment
59
securities (mainly U.S. sponsored agency fixed-rate MBS) and an increase in gains from
mortgage banking activities driven by a higher volume of loan sales and securitizations.
The highlights and key drivers of the Corporations financial results for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 include the following:
|
|
|
Net interest income for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 was $129.1 million,
compared to $144.6 million for the same period in 2008. The net interest spread and
margin, on an adjusted tax equivalent basis, for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 were
2.66% and 2.95%, respectively, compared to 3.03% and 3.37%, respectively, for the same
period in 2008. Net interest income was adversely impacted primarily by a significant
increase in non-accrual loans and the repricing of floating-rate
commercial and construction loans at lower rates. Lower loan yields more than offset the
benefit of lower short-term rates in the average cost of funding and the increase in
average interest-earning assets. Refer to the Net Interest Income discussion below for
additional information. |
|
|
|
|
For the third quarter of 2009, the Corporations provision for loan and lease losses
amounted to $148.1 million, compared to $55.3 million for the same period in 2008. Refer
to the discussion under the Risk Management section below for an analysis of the
allowance for loan and lease losses and non-performing assets and related ratios. The
increase in the provision for 2009 was primarily due to: a higher
volume of classified loans, including non-performing and impaired
loans, that required higher reserves; changes in reserve factors used to determine the
general reserve for the Corporations construction, commercial and residential mortgage
loan portfolios, in both the Puerto Rico and Florida portfolios, to account for higher
charge-offs and delinquency levels; specific reserves necessary for additional loans
classified as impaired during the third quarter of 2009; and the overall growth of the
Corporations loan portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
The Corporations net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009 were $84.4 million or 2.53%
of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $25.2 million or 0.80% of average
loans on an annualized basis for the same period in 2008. The increase in net charge-offs
was primarily related to construction loans, in both, Florida and Puerto Rico. Refer to
the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses and Risk Management Non-performing assets and
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses sections below for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporations non-interest income
amounted to $50.0 million, compared to $13.9 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2008. The increase was mainly due to a realized gain of $34.3 million on the sale of
certain investments and a $1.8 million increase in gains from mortgage banking activities.
During the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation completed the sale of approximately
$613 million of U.S. agency MBS, realizing a gain of $28.3 million. Also, the Corporation
realized a gain of $1.9 million on the sale of approximately $98 million of 7-10 Year U.S.
Treasury Notes and a gain of $3.8 million on the sale of VISA Class A stock. Refer to the
Non Interest Income discussion below for additional information. |
60
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses for the third quarter of 2009 amounted to $82.8 million, compared
to $82.4 million for the same period in 2008. The slight increase is mainly related to an
increase of $3.9 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, related to increase in
regular assessment rates, which is an uncontrollable expense. This was almost entirely
offset by reductions of $3.5 million in controllable expenses such as
employeescompensation, business promotion and occupancy expenses. Refer to the Non
Interest Expenses discussion below for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
For the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $113.5
million, compared to an income tax benefit of $3.7 million for the same period in 2008.
The recognition of an income tax expense for the quarter mainly resulted from the non-cash
charge of approximately $152.2 million to increase the valuation allowance for the
Corporations deferred tax asset. Refer to the Income Taxes discussion below for
additional information about the increase in the valuation allowance. |
|
|
|
|
Total assets as of September 30, 2009 amounted to $20.1 billion, an increase
of $589.9 million compared to total assets as of December 31, 2008. The increase in total
assets was primarily a result of an increase of $477.9 million in total loans (net of an
increase of $190 million in the allowance for loan and lease losses), partially offset by
a decrease of $189.6 million in cash and cash equivalent funds used to pay down maturing
borrowings and a decrease of $154.1 million in investment securities due to the
aforementioned sales. However, as of September 30, 2009, there was an unsettled sale of
MBS amounting to approximately $465 million that is still reported as an asset (account
receivable) at the end of the quarter. Refer to the Financial Condition and Operating
Data discussion below for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, total liabilities amounted to $18.4 billion, an increase of
approximately $439.2 million, as compared to $17.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. The
increase in total liabilities was mainly attributable to an increase of $361.1 million in
repurchase agreements and a net increase of $840 million in advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve (FED), mainly short-term borrowings to
replace brokered CDs and as a measure of interest rate risk management to match the
shortening in the average life of the investment portfolio. Total liabilities also
increased due to an increase of $177.1 million in core deposits. The aforementioned
increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $935.7 million in brokered
CDs. Brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) with original maturities over 6 months and
issued when interest rates were higher matured or were called during 2009 and current
short-term rates on repurchase agreements and FHLB and FED advances provided a cost
effective funding alternative. Refer to the Risk management Liquidity and
Capital Adequacy discussion below for additional information about the Corporations
funding sources. |
|
|
|
|
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to $1.7 billion as of September 30,
2009, an increase of $150.7 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008,
driven by the $400 million investment by the United States Department of the Treasury (the
U.S. Treasury) in preferred stock of the Corporation through the
U.S. Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) Capital Purchase Program |
61
|
|
|
and an
unrealized gain of $15.7 million on the fair value of available-for-sale securities
recorded as part of comprehensive income . Partially offsetting this increase was the net
loss of $222.0 million incurred in the first nine months of 2009, dividends amounting to
$43.1 million for the first nine months of 2009 ($13.0 million in common stock, or $0.14
per share, and $30.1 million in preferred stock). Refer to the Risk Management Capital
section below for additional information. |
|
|
|
|
Total loan production, including purchases and refinancings, for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 was $1.4 billion, compared to $1.2 billion for the comparable
period in 2008. The increase in loan production during 2009, as compared to the third
quarter of 2008, was mainly associated with the $689 million in credit facilities extended to
the Puerto Rico Government. |
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets as of September 30, 2009 were $1.68 billion, compared to
$637.2 million as of December 31, 2008. The increase in non-performing assets since
December 31, 2008 was led by an increase of $537.0 million in loans classified as
non-performing in Puerto Rico, including increases of $181.0 million in construction
loans, $173.5 million in Commercial and Industrial (C&I) loans, $120.9 million in
residential mortgage loans and $60.5 million in commercial mortgage loans. In Florida,
non-performing loans increased by $401.4 million, including increases of $314.0 million in
construction loans, $45.3 million in residential mortgage loans and $40.3 million in
commercial mortgage loans. In the Virgin Islands, non-performing loans increased by $13.2
million, mainly commercial mortgage loans. |
|
|
|
|
Also, during 2009, the Corporation classified as non-performing investment securities
with a book value of $64.5 million that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing,
Inc., in connection with several interest rate swap agreements entered into with that
institution. Considering that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the
Corporation, despite its efforts in this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such
investments as non-performing. Other increases in non-performing assets mainly consist of
additions to the real estate owned portfolio, which increased by $30.2 million. Refer to
the Risk Management Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets section below for additional
information. |
62
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRACTICES
The accounting principles of the Corporation and the methods of applying these principles
conform with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) and to general
practices within the banking industry. The Corporations critical accounting policies relate to the
1) allowance for loan and lease losses; 2) other-than-temporary impairments; 3) income taxes; 4)
classification and related values of investment securities; 5) valuation of financial instruments;
6) derivative financial instruments; and 7) income recognition on loans. These critical accounting
policies involve judgments, estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the recorded
assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities disclosed as of the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from estimates, if different assumptions or conditions
prevail. Certain determinations inherently have greater reliance on the use of estimates,
assumptions, and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could
be materially different than those originally reported.
The Corporations critical accounting policies are described in the Management Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorps 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Corporations critical
accounting policies since December 31, 2008, except for changes in the Other-than-Temporary
Impairment (OTTI) model for debt securities as required by new guidance issued by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board. Refer to Note 4 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial
statements for additional information about the OTTI model.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned by First BanCorp on its interest-earning
assets over the interest incurred on its interest-bearing liabilities. First BanCorps net interest
income is subject to interest rate risk due to the re-pricing and maturity mismatch of the
Corporations assets and liabilities. Net interest income for the quarter and nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009 was $129.1 million and $381.7 million, respectively, compared to $144.6
million and $403.7 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2008. On a tax equivalent
basis and excluding the changes in the fair value of derivative instruments and unrealized gains
and losses on liabilities measured at fair value, net interest income for the quarter and
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was $145.1 million and $420.1 million, respectively,
compared to $158.2 million and $433.9 million, respectively, for the comparable periods of 2008.
The following tables include a detailed analysis of net interest income. Part I presents
average volumes and rates on an adjusted tax equivalent basis and Part II presents, also on an
adjusted tax equivalent basis, the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume
of interest-related assets and liabilities have affected the Corporations net interest income. For
each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided
on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior period
rates), and (ii) changes in rate (changes in
63
rate multiplied by prior period volumes). Rate-volume
variances (changes in rate multiplied by changes in
volume) have been allocated to the changes in volume and rate based
upon their respective percentage of the combined totals.
The net interest income is computed on a tax equivalent basis (for definition and
reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure, refer to discussions below) and excluding: (1) the change
in the fair value of derivative instruments and (2) unrealized gains or losses on liabilities
measured at fair value.
64
Part I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume |
|
|
Interest income(1) / expense |
|
|
Average rate(1) |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Quarter ended |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments |
|
$ |
161,491 |
|
|
$ |
178,973 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
2.17 |
% |
Government obligations (2) |
|
|
1,382,167 |
|
|
|
1,031,654 |
|
|
|
9,709 |
|
|
|
18,218 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
|
7.03 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4,595,678 |
|
|
|
4,809,138 |
|
|
|
63,588 |
|
|
|
78,214 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
% |
|
|
6.47 |
% |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
6,103 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
9.32 |
% |
FHLB stock |
|
|
76,843 |
|
|
|
69,427 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
5.36 |
% |
|
|
5.55 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
3,692 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
1.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments (3) |
|
|
6,220,156 |
|
|
|
6,098,987 |
|
|
|
74,567 |
|
|
|
98,535 |
|
|
|
4.76 |
% |
|
|
6.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
3,602,562 |
|
|
|
3,427,707 |
|
|
|
53,617 |
|
|
|
54,756 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
6.36 |
% |
Construction loans |
|
|
1,604,565 |
|
|
|
1,487,779 |
|
|
|
12,402 |
|
|
|
20,286 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
5.42 |
% |
C&I and commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
6,137,781 |
|
|
|
5,477,213 |
|
|
|
62,379 |
|
|
|
74,164 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
% |
|
|
5.39 |
% |
Finance leases |
|
|
335,636 |
|
|
|
372,404 |
|
|
|
6,775 |
|
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
8.01 |
% |
|
|
8.38 |
% |
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,640,556 |
|
|
|
1,800,336 |
|
|
|
46,692 |
|
|
|
52,142 |
|
|
|
11.29 |
% |
|
|
11.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (4) (5) |
|
|
13,321,100 |
|
|
|
12,565,439 |
|
|
|
181,865 |
|
|
|
209,190 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
19,541,256 |
|
|
$ |
18,664,426 |
|
|
$ |
256,432 |
|
|
$ |
307,725 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
6.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs |
|
$ |
7,292,913 |
|
|
$ |
7,643,238 |
|
|
$ |
51,305 |
|
|
$ |
73,962 |
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
|
|
3.85 |
% |
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
3,995,123 |
|
|
|
3,677,632 |
|
|
|
20,860 |
|
|
|
26,005 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
|
2.81 |
% |
Loans payable |
|
|
652,391 |
|
|
|
42,391 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
4,171,348 |
|
|
|
4,296,355 |
|
|
|
30,545 |
|
|
|
39,333 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
1,196,657 |
|
|
|
1,212,121 |
|
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
|
10,018 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities (6) |
|
$ |
17,308,432 |
|
|
$ |
16,871,737 |
|
|
$ |
111,300 |
|
|
$ |
149,558 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
|
3.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145,132 |
|
|
$ |
158,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average volume |
|
|
Interest income(1) / expense |
|
|
Average rate(1) |
|
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments |
|
$ |
126,234 |
|
|
$ |
327,451 |
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
6,046 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Government obligations (2) |
|
|
1,355,492 |
|
|
|
1,532,736 |
|
|
|
45,214 |
|
|
|
75,929 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
6.62 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4,392,359 |
|
|
|
3,674,801 |
|
|
|
187,021 |
|
|
|
170,239 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
|
6.19 |
% |
Corporate bonds |
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
% |
|
|
9.22 |
% |
FHLB stock |
|
|
78,178 |
|
|
|
65,998 |
|
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
3,229 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
6.54 |
% |
Equity securities |
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
4,020 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments (3) |
|
|
5,960,069 |
|
|
|
5,611,164 |
|
|
|
235,132 |
|
|
|
255,897 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
6.09 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
3,508,471 |
|
|
|
3,309,221 |
|
|
|
159,383 |
|
|
|
160,715 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
% |
|
|
6.49 |
% |
Construction loans |
|
|
1,592,372 |
|
|
|
1,478,794 |
|
|
|
39,646 |
|
|
|
64,751 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
5.85 |
% |
C&I and commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
6,223,979 |
|
|
|
5,360,382 |
|
|
|
193,325 |
|
|
|
233,065 |
|
|
|
4.15 |
% |
|
|
5.81 |
% |
Finance leases |
|
|
347,791 |
|
|
|
375,460 |
|
|
|
21,468 |
|
|
|
24,238 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.62 |
% |
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,681,015 |
|
|
|
1,689,565 |
|
|
|
142,722 |
|
|
|
146,677 |
|
|
|
11.35 |
% |
|
|
11.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans (4) (5) |
|
|
13,353,628 |
|
|
|
12,213,422 |
|
|
|
556,544 |
|
|
|
629,446 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
|
6.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
19,313,697 |
|
|
$ |
17,824,586 |
|
|
$ |
791,676 |
|
|
$ |
885,343 |
|
|
|
5.48 |
% |
|
|
6.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs |
|
$ |
7,267,812 |
|
|
$ |
7,406,242 |
|
|
$ |
180,815 |
|
|
$ |
231,883 |
|
|
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
4,056,396 |
|
|
|
3,553,985 |
|
|
|
69,495 |
|
|
|
78,355 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
Loans payable |
|
|
574,117 |
|
|
|
14,234 |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
3,799,118 |
|
|
|
3,898,835 |
|
|
|
95,113 |
|
|
|
110,178 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
FHLB advances |
|
|
1,395,752 |
|
|
|
1,143,851 |
|
|
|
24,736 |
|
|
|
30,738 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities (6) |
|
$ |
17,093,195 |
|
|
$ |
16,017,147 |
|
|
$ |
371,582 |
|
|
$ |
451,394 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
3.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
420,094 |
|
|
$ |
433,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
Net interest margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On an adjusted tax equivalent basis. The adjusted tax equivalent yield was estimated by
dividing the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less Puerto Rico statutory tax rate
as adjusted for recent changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporations subsidiaries
other than IBEs in 2009, 35.95% for the Corporations IBEs in 2009 and 39% for all
subsidiaries in 2008) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The tax
equivalent adjustment recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt
assets. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present
net interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent
basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information to investors
by allowing them to make peer comparisons. Changes in the fair value of derivative and
unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from interest
income and interest expense because the changes in valuation do not affect interest paid or
received. |
|
(2) |
|
Government obligations include debt issued by government sponsored agencies. |
|
(3) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses in available-for-sale securities are excluded from the average
volumes. |
|
(4) |
|
Average loan balances include the average of non-accruing loans. |
|
(5) |
|
Interest income on loans includes $2.8 million and $2.5 million for the third quarter of 2009
and 2008, respectively, and $8.3 million and $7.9 million
for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, of income from prepayment penalties and late fees
related to the Corporations loan portfolio. |
|
(6) |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on liabilities measured at fair value are excluded from the
average volumes. |
65
Part II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-month period ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 compared to 2008 |
|
|
2009 compared to 2008 |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
Due to: |
|
|
Due to: |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market & other short-term investments |
|
$ |
(87 |
) |
|
$ |
(702 |
) |
|
$ |
(789 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,403 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,250 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,653 |
) |
Government obligations |
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
(12,798 |
) |
|
|
(8,509 |
) |
|
|
(8,042 |
) |
|
|
(22,673 |
) |
|
|
(30,715 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
(3,313 |
) |
|
|
(11,313 |
) |
|
|
(14,626 |
) |
|
|
31,868 |
|
|
|
(15,086 |
) |
|
|
16,782 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
FHLB stock |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
Equity securities |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
(24,875 |
) |
|
|
(23,968 |
) |
|
|
21,830 |
|
|
|
(42,595 |
) |
|
|
(20,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
|
2,749 |
|
|
|
(3,888 |
) |
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
|
9,313 |
|
|
|
(10,645 |
) |
|
|
(1,332 |
) |
Construction loans |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
(9,119 |
) |
|
|
(7,884 |
) |
|
|
3,913 |
|
|
|
(29,018 |
) |
|
|
(25,105 |
) |
C&I and commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
7,830 |
|
|
|
(19,615 |
) |
|
|
(11,785 |
) |
|
|
32,205 |
|
|
|
(71,945 |
) |
|
|
(39,740 |
) |
Finance leases |
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(1,067 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
(2,770 |
) |
Consumer loans |
|
|
(4,448 |
) |
|
|
(1,002 |
) |
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
(3,190 |
) |
|
|
(3,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
(33,953 |
) |
|
|
(27,325 |
) |
|
|
42,916 |
|
|
|
(115,818 |
) |
|
|
(72,902 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
7,535 |
|
|
|
(58,828 |
) |
|
|
(51,293 |
) |
|
|
64,746 |
|
|
|
(158,413 |
) |
|
|
(93,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokered CDs |
|
|
(3,237 |
) |
|
|
(19,420 |
) |
|
|
(22,657 |
) |
|
|
(4,274 |
) |
|
|
(46,794 |
) |
|
|
(51,068 |
) |
Other interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
(7,098 |
) |
|
|
(5,145 |
) |
|
|
9,840 |
|
|
|
(18,700 |
) |
|
|
(8,860 |
) |
Loan payable |
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
(1,708 |
) |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
(4,240 |
) |
|
|
1,183 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
(1,105 |
) |
|
|
(7,683 |
) |
|
|
(8,788 |
) |
|
|
(2,775 |
) |
|
|
(12,290 |
) |
|
|
(15,065 |
) |
FHLB advances |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(1,766 |
) |
|
|
(1,891 |
) |
|
|
5,623 |
|
|
|
(11,625 |
) |
|
|
(6,002 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
(37,675 |
) |
|
|
(38,258 |
) |
|
|
13,837 |
|
|
|
(93,649 |
) |
|
|
(79,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
8,118 |
|
|
$ |
(21,153 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,035 |
) |
|
$ |
50,909 |
|
|
$ |
(64,764 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the Corporations interest-earning assets, mostly investments in
obligations of some U.S. Government agencies and sponsored entities, generate interest which is
exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. Also, interest and gains on sales of
investments held by the Corporations international banking entities are tax-exempt under the
Puerto Rico tax law (Refer to the Income Taxes discussion below for additional information
regarding recent legislation that imposes a temporary 5% tax rate on IBEs net income). To
facilitate the comparison of all interest data related to these assets, the interest income has
been converted to a taxable equivalent basis. The tax equivalent yield was estimated by dividing
the interest rate spread on exempt assets by 1 less the Puerto Rico statutory tax rate as
adjusted for recent changes to enacted tax rates (40.95% for the Corporations subsidiaries other
than IBEs in 2009, 35.95% for the Corporations IBEs in 2009 and 39% for all subsidiaries in
2008) and adding to it the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The computation considers the
interest expense disallowance required by Puerto Rico tax law. An increase in revenues was
observed in connection with the increase in volume and interest rate spread in tax-exempt MBS held
by the Corporations IBEs. Refer to the Income Taxes discussion below for additional information
of the Puerto Rico tax law.
The presentation of net interest income excluding the effects of the changes in the fair value
of the derivative instruments and unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value
provides additional information about the Corporations net interest income and facilitates
comparability and analysis. The changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments and
unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value have no effect on interest due or
interest earned on interest-bearing liabilities or interest-earning assets, respectively, or on
interest payments exchanged with interest rate swap counterparties.
The following table reconciles the interest income on an adjusted tax equivalent basis set
forth in Part I above to interest income set forth in the Consolidated Statements of (Loss)
Income:
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-month period ended September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets on an adjusted tax equivalent basis |
|
$ |
256,432 |
|
|
$ |
307,725 |
|
|
$ |
791,676 |
|
|
$ |
885,343 |
|
Less: tax equivalent adjustments |
|
|
(12,925 |
) |
|
|
(17,859 |
) |
|
|
(41,306 |
) |
|
|
(40,702 |
) |
(Less) Plus: net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives |
|
|
(1,485 |
) |
|
|
(1,574 |
) |
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
242,022 |
|
|
$ |
288,292 |
|
|
$ |
753,125 |
|
|
$ |
843,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of the changes in fair values of interest
rate swaps and interest rate caps, which are included in interest income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-month period ended September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
$ |
(1,079 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,438 |
) |
|
$ |
1,771 |
|
|
$ |
(558 |
) |
Interest rate swaps on loans |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) |
|
$ |
(1,485 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,574 |
) |
|
$ |
2,755 |
|
|
$ |
(654 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
The following table summarizes the components of interest expense for the quarters and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. As previously stated, the net interest
margin analysis excludes the changes in the fair value of derivatives and unrealized gains or
losses on liabilities measured at fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-month period ended September 30, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
106,012 |
|
|
$ |
155,965 |
|
|
$ |
359,647 |
|
|
$ |
470,669 |
|
Net interest realized on interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,263 |
) |
|
|
(5,499 |
) |
|
|
(30,210 |
) |
Amortization of placement fees on brokered CDs |
|
|
5,288 |
|
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
17,434 |
|
|
|
10,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense excluding net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic
undesignated hedges) and net unrealized (gain) loss on liabilities measured at fair value |
|
|
111,300 |
|
|
|
149,558 |
|
|
|
371,582 |
|
|
|
451,394 |
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated) and liabilities measured at fair value |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
(5,887 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(11,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
112,889 |
|
|
$ |
143,671 |
|
|
$ |
371,380 |
|
|
$ |
440,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of the net unrealized gain and loss on
derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and net unrealized gain and loss on liabilities
measured at fair value which are included in interest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-month period ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on brokered CDs |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,669 |
) |
|
$ |
5,317 |
|
|
$ |
(31,071 |
) |
Interest rate swaps and other derivatives on medium-term notes |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(5,717 |
) |
|
$ |
5,494 |
|
|
$ |
(31,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on liabilities measured at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on brokered CDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
(8,696 |
) |
|
|
21,886 |
|
Unrealized loss (gain) on medium-term notes |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(961 |
) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
1,576 |
|
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,696 |
) |
|
$ |
20,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss (gain) on derivatives (economic undesignated hedges) and
liabilities measured at fair value |
|
$ |
1,589 |
|
|
$ |
(5,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(202 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on interest-earning assets primarily represents interest earned on loans
receivable and investment securities.
Interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities primarily represents interest paid on
brokered CDs, branch-based deposits, repurchase agreements, advances from the FHLB and FED and
notes payable.
Net interest incurred or realized on interest rate swaps primarily represents net interest
exchanged on pay-float swaps that economically hedge brokered CDs and medium-term notes.
The amortization of broker placement fees represents the amortization of fees paid to brokers
upon issuance of related financial instruments (i.e., brokered CDs not elected to be measured at
fair value).
Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives represent changes in the fair value of derivatives,
primarily interest rate swaps, that economically hedge liabilities (i.e., brokered CDs and
medium-term notes) or assets (i.e., loans and investments).
Unrealized gains or losses on liabilities measured at fair value represent the change in the
fair value of such liabilities (medium-term notes and brokered CDs), other than the accrual of
interests.
68
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. While the
Corporation does have certain trading derivatives to facilitate customer transactions, the
Corporation does not utilize derivative instruments for speculative purposes. As of September 30,
2009, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding are used for protection against rising interest
rates. In the past, the volume of interest rate swaps was much higher, as they were used to
convert the fixed-rate of a large portfolio of brokered CDs, mainly those with long-term
maturities, to a variable rate and mitigate the interest rate risk related to variable rate loans.
However, most of these interest rate swaps were called during 2009, in the face of lower interest
rate levels. Refer to Note 8 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for
further details concerning the notional amounts of derivative instruments and additional
information. As is the case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments
is largely a function of the financial markets expectations regarding the future direction of
interest rates. Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future
impact of derivative instruments on net interest income. This will depend, for the most part, on
the shape of the yield curve, the level of interest rates, as well as the expectations for rates
in the future.
Net interest income decreased 11% to $129.1 million for the third quarter of 2009 from $144.6
million in the third quarter of 2008 and by 5% to $381.7 million for the first nine months of 2009
from $403.7 million in the same period of 2008. Net interest income was adversely impacted
primarily by a significant increase in non-accrual loans and the repricing of
floating-rate commercial and construction loans at lower rates. Net interest margin on an adjusted
tax-equivalent basis decreased from 3.37% for the third quarter of 2008 to 2.95% for the third
quarter of 2009 and from 3.25% for the first nine months of 2008 to 2.91% for the first nine months
of 2009. Lower loan yields more than offset the benefit of lower short-term rates in the average
cost of funding and the increase in average interest-earning assets. The weighted-average yield on
loans on a tax-equivalent basis decreased from 6.62% for the third quarter of 2008 to 5.42% for the
third quarter of 2009 and from 6.88% for the first nine months of 2008 to 5.57% for the same period
in 2009. The average 3-month LIBOR for the third quarter of 2009 was 0.41% compared to 2.91% for
the same period a year ago and the Prime Rate dropped to 3.25% from 5.00% as of September 30, 2008,
adversely affecting the interest income from the variable-rate construction and commercial loans
tied to short-term indexes, which was exacerbated by the significant increase of approximately $1.0
billion in non-performing loans since September 30, 2008 (refer to Risk Management Non-accruing
and Non-performing Assets section below for additional information about non-performing loans
levels). The Corporation is currently originating loans and renegotiating existing ones at higher
credit spreads to account for inherent risks in the current economy. Such actions are positively
impacting net interest income. Lower yields were also observed in the investment securities
portfolio, driven by MBS prepayments and the approximately $940 million U.S. agency debentures
called since September 30, 2008, which were replaced
with lower yielding investments financed with very low-cost sources of funding. Partially
offsetting the decline in earning assets yields were lower funding costs and an increase in average
earning assets. The decrease in the Corporations average cost of funds is related to the current
low level of short-term interest rates as well as the change in the mix of funding sources.
Brokered certificates of deposit (CDs) with original maturities over 6 months and issued when
interest rates were higher matured, or were called during 2009, and current short-term rates on
FHLB and FED advances have provided a cost effective funding alternative. Since being approved to
participate during the first
69
quarter of 2009 in the Borrower-in-Custody Program (BIC) of the FED,
the Corporation has taken advantage of that alternative funding channel. Through the BIC program, a
broad range of loans (including commercial, consumer and mortgages) are pledged as collateral for
borrowings at the FED Discount Window. The Corporation has increased its use of this low-cost
source of funding, and, as of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had approximately $1.0 billion of
available credit through the BIC program. Also, the current low interest rate levels made
available the issuance of new short-term brokered CDs at rates significantly lower than those that
matured. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation issued $5.5 billion
in brokered CDs at an average rate of 0.79% (including the rollover of short-term brokered CDs and
replacement of brokered CDs called). The Corporation increased its short-term borrowing as a
measure of interest rate risk management to match the shortening in the average life of the
investment portfolio, as discussed below, and has been reducing the pricing of its core deposits
given current market rates.
Average earning assets for the third quarter of 2009 increased by $876.8 million as compared
to the third quarter of 2008 and by $1.5 billion for the first nine months of 2009, as compared to
the comparable period in 2008. The increase was driven by the growth of the C&I loan portfolio in
Puerto Rico, including credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government of approximately
$689 million in the third quarter of 2009. Also, funds obtained through short-term borrowings as
well as proceeds from sales and prepayments of MBS were invested, in part, in the purchase of
investment securities to offset declining securities yields due to the acceleration of MBS
prepayments and calls of approximately $937 million of U.S. agency debentures in 2009. The
average volume of investment securities increased by $121.2 million for the third quarter of 2009,
as compared to the third quarter of 2008, and by $348.9 million for the first nine months of 2009
compared to the first nine months of 2008. Purchases of investment securities in 2009 were
financed with very low-cost of sources of funding, thus protecting interest margins.
On an adjusted tax equivalent basis, net interest income decreased by $13.0 million, or 8%,
for the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 and by $13.9 million for the
first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease for the third quarter
of 2009, as compared to the third quarter of 2008, was principally due to the lower yields on
earning assets as described above and a decrease of $4.9 million in the tax-equivalent adjustment.
The tax-equivalent adjustment increases interest income on tax-exempt securities and loans by an
amount which makes tax-exempt income comparable, on a pre-tax basis, to the Corporations taxable
income as previously stated. The decrease in the tax-equivalent adjustment was mainly related to
decreases in the interest rate spread on tax-exempt assets, mainly due to lower yields on U.S.
agency and MBS held by the Corporations IBE subsidiary, as the Corporation replaced securities
called and prepayments and sales of MBS with shorter-term securities,
and due to the decrease in income tax savings on securities held by FirstBank Overseas
Corporation resulting from the temporary 5% tax imposed in 2009 to all IBEs (see Income Taxes
discussion below).
70
Provision and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for
loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to absorb probable losses
inherent in the portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is also based
upon a number of additional factors including trends in charge-offs and delinquencies, current
economic conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral and the financial condition of the
borrowers, and, as such, includes amounts based on judgments and estimates made by the Corporation.
Although the Corporation believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors
beyond the Corporations control, including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the
United States, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands, may contribute to
delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
For the quarter and nine-month period ended on September 30, 2009, the Corporation provided
$148.1 million and $442.7 million, respectively, for loan and lease losses as compared to $55.3
million and $142.4 million, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2008. Refer to the
discussions under Credit Risk Management below for an analysis of the allowance for loan and
lease losses, non-performing assets, impaired loans and related information and refer to the
discussions under Financial Condition and Operating Analysis Loan Portfolio and under Risk
Management Credit Risk Management below for additional information concerning the Corporations
loan portfolio exposure in the geographic areas where the Corporation does business.
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Other service charges on loans |
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
|
$ |
1,612 |
|
|
$ |
4,848 |
|
|
$ |
4,343 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
3,458 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
9,950 |
|
|
|
9,725 |
|
Mortgage banking activities |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
2,354 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
Insurance income |
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
2,631 |
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
Other operating income |
|
|
4,964 |
|
|
|
5,208 |
|
|
|
13,560 |
|
|
|
14,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income before net gain on investments |
|
|
15,924 |
|
|
|
14,435 |
|
|
|
42,698 |
|
|
|
40,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on VISA shares and related proceeds |
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
9,474 |
|
Net gain on sale of investments |
|
|
30,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,633 |
|
|
|
6,661 |
|
OTTI on equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(1,185 |
) |
OTTI on debt securities |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on investments |
|
|
34,065 |
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
60,759 |
|
|
|
14,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
49,989 |
|
|
$ |
13,871 |
|
|
$ |
103,457 |
|
|
$ |
55,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income primarily consists of other service charges on loans; service charges
on deposit accounts; commissions derived from various banking, securities and insurance activities;
gains and losses on mortgage banking activities; and net gains and losses on investments and
impairments.
Other service charges on loans consist mainly of service charges on credit card-related
activities and other non-deferrable fees (e.g. agent, commitment and drawing fees).
Service charges on deposit accounts include monthly fees and other fees on deposit accounts.
71
Income from mortgage banking activities includes gains on sales and securitization of loans
and revenues earned administering residential mortgage loans originated by the Corporation and
subsequently sold with servicing retained. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation
adjustments to the Corporations residential mortgage loans held for sale and servicing rights, if
any, are recorded as part of mortgage banking activities.
Rental income represents income generated by the Corporations subsidiary, First Leasing and
Rental Corporation, on the rental of various types of motor vehicles.
Insurance income consists of insurance commissions earned by the Corporations subsidiary
FirstBank Insurance Agency, Inc., and the Banks subsidiary in the U.S. Virgin Islands, FirstBank
Insurance V.I., Inc. These subsidiaries offer a wide variety of insurance business.
The other operating income category is composed of miscellaneous fees such as debit, credit
card and point of sale (POS) interchange fees and check and cash management fees.
The net gain (loss) on investment securities reflects gains or losses as a result of sales
that are consistent with the Corporations investment policies as well as other-than-temporary
impairment charges on the Corporations investment portfolio.
Non-interest income increased to $50.0 million for the third quarter of 2009 from $13.9
million for the third quarter of 2008. The increase in non-interest income reflected:
|
|
|
A $34.1 million realized gain on the sale of investment securities, primarily
reflecting a $28.3 million gain on the sale of U.S. agency MBS. The recent drop in
mortgage pre-payments, as well as future pre-payment estimates, suggests longer expected
lives of MBS, which in turn could place the Corporations balance sheet in a
less-than-optimal liability-sensitive position in terms of interest rate risk. In an
effort to manage such risk, and taking advantage of favorable market valuations,
approximately $613 million of 5.5% 30-year U.S. agency MBS were sold in the third quarter,
which resulted in the realization of a gain. Also, the Corporation realized a gain of $1.9
million on the sale of approximately $98 million of 7-10 Year U.S. Treasury Notes, which
carried a weighted-average yield of 3.54%, and a gain of $3.8 million on the sale of VISA
Class A stock. |
|
|
|
|
A $1.8 million increase in gains from mortgage banking activities, due to the increased
volume of loan sales and securitizations. Servicing assets recorded at the time of sale
amounted to $1.7 million for the third quarter of 2009, compared to $0.4 million for the
same quarter a year ago, an increase mainly related to $1.4 million of capitalized
servicing assets in connection with the securitization of approximately $74 million FHA/VA
mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. For the first time in several years, the Corporation has
been engaged in the securitization of mortgage loans in 2009. |
72
|
|
|
Other increases in non-interest income include higher fees on loans, service charges on
deposit accounts, ATM fee income and fees from services to corporate customers. |
For the first nine months of 2009, non-interest income increased to $103.5 million from $55.3
million for the first nine months of 2008. Significant variances are as follows:
|
|
|
A $55.8 million increase in realized gains on the sale of investment securities,
primarily reflecting the aforementioned $34.1 million realized gain in the third quarter
of 2009 combined with $28.1 million in realized gains on the sale of approximately $763
million of investment securities (mainly U.S. agency MBS) in the first half of 2009.
Realized gains on sale of investment securities during the first nine months of 2008
totaled $6.7 million. |
|
|
|
|
A $3.8 million increase in gains from mortgage banking activities, due to the
increased volume of loan sales and securitizations. Servicing assets capitalized during
the first nine months of 2009 amounted to $5.0 million compared to $1.0 million for the
comparable period in 2008. |
The aforementioned increases were partially offset by, when compared to the first nine months
of 2008, the $9.3 million gain recorded in the first quarter of 2008 on the mandatory redemption
of a portion of the Corporations investment in VISA as part of VISAs Initial Public Offering and
decreases in insurance and rental income.
Non-Interest Expenses
The following table presents the detail of non-interest expenses for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-month Period Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Employees compensation and benefits |
|
$ |
34,403 |
|
|
$ |
35,629 |
|
|
$ |
103,117 |
|
|
$ |
106,949 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
15,291 |
|
|
|
15,647 |
|
|
|
47,513 |
|
|
|
46,167 |
|
Deposit insurance premium |
|
|
6,884 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
26,659 |
|
|
|
7,658 |
|
Other taxes, insurance and supervisory fees |
|
|
4,206 |
|
|
|
5,488 |
|
|
|
15,743 |
|
|
|
16,740 |
|
Professional fees recurring |
|
|
3,391 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
9,352 |
|
|
|
10,080 |
|
Professional fees non-recurring |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
2,622 |
|
Servicing and processing fees |
|
|
2,784 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
7,342 |
|
|
|
7,654 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
9,831 |
|
|
|
13,150 |
|
Communications |
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
6,228 |
|
|
|
6,696 |
|
Net loss on REO operations |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
5,626 |
|
|
|
17,016 |
|
|
|
12,054 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,426 |
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
19,510 |
|
|
|
16,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82,777 |
|
|
$ |
82,376 |
|
|
$ |
263,293 |
|
|
$ |
246,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses increased to $82.8 million for the third quarter of 2009 from $82.4
million for the third quarter of 2008. The slight increase reflected:
|
|
|
An increase of $3.9 million in the FDIC deposit insurance premium, related to increases
in regular assessment rates, which is an uncontrollable expense. |
The increase was almost entirely offset by reductions of $3.5 million in controllable expenses such
as reductions in employees compensation and benefits expenses, mainly due to a decrease in the
accrual of bonuses, as well as reductions in expenses related to business promotion, occupancy, REO losses and taxes
(other than income taxes), partially offset by an
73
increase in professional fees.
Management is intensely focused on controlling expenses and improving profitability.
The efficiency ratio for the third quarter of 2009 was 46.21% compared to 51.97% for the same
period in 2008.
Non-interest expenses increased to $263.3 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared
to $246.3 million for the same period in 2008. The increase is mainly related to:
|
|
|
An increase of $19.0 million in FDIC assessment fees, including the $8.9 million
special assessment recorded in the second quarter of 2009 and increases to the regular
assessment rates. |
|
|
|
|
An increase of $5.0 million in the net loss on REO operations, mainly due to increases
in write-downs to the value of foreclosed properties in both Florida and Puerto Rico. |
|
|
|
|
A $4.0 million impairment of the core deposit intangible of FirstBank Florida, recorded
in the first half of 2009. The core deposit intangible represents the value of the
premium paid to acquire core deposits of an institution. |
The aforementioned increases, were partially offset by decreases in controllable expenses such
as:
|
|
|
A $3.8 million decrease in employees compensation and benefit expenses, mainly due to
a decrease in the accrual of bonuses as well as reductions in overtime and temporary
employees costs. |
|
|
|
|
A $3.3 million decrease in business promotion expenses due to a lower level of
marketing activities. |
|
|
|
|
A $2.4 million decrease in professional fees. |
All other non-interest expenses were relatively stable as management has worked to control
costs through its corporate-wide Business Rationalization initiative, which includes revenue
generating and cost-cutting initiatives.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense includes Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands income taxes as well as applicable
U.S. federal and state taxes. The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax on its income
from all sources. As a Puerto Rico corporation, First BanCorp is treated as a foreign corporation
for U.S. income tax purposes and is generally subject to United States income tax only on its
income from sources within the United States or income effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business within the United States. Any such tax
paid is creditable, within certain conditions and limitations, against the Corporations
Puerto Rico tax liability. The Corporation is also subject to U.S. Virgin Islands taxes on its
income from sources within that jurisdiction. Any such tax paid is also creditable against the
Corporations Puerto Rico tax liability, subject to certain conditions and limitations.
74
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (PR Code), First BanCorp is
subject to a maximum statutory tax rate of 39%. In 2009 the Puerto Rico Government approved Act
No. 7 (the Act), to stimulate Puerto Ricos economy and to reduce the Puerto Rico Governments
fiscal deficit. The Act imposes a series of temporary and permanent measures, including the
imposition of a 5% surtax over the total income tax determined, which is applicable to
corporations, among others, whose combined income exceeds $100,000, effectively resulting in an
increase in the maximum statutory tax rate from 39% to 40.95%. This temporary measure is effective
for tax years that commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The PR Code also
includes an alternative minimum tax of 22% that applies if the Corporations regular income tax
liability is less than the alternative minimum tax requirements.
The Corporation has maintained an effective tax rate lower than the maximum statutory rate
mainly by investing in government obligations and mortgage-backed securities exempt from U.S. and
Puerto Rico income taxes and by doing business through International Banking Entities (IBEs) of
the Corporation and the Bank and through the Banks subsidiary FirstBank Overseas Corporation, in
which the interest income and gain on sales is exempt from Puerto Rico and U.S. income taxation.
Under the Act, all IBEs are subject to a special 5% tax on their net income not otherwise subject
to tax pursuant to the PR Code. This temporary measure is also effective for tax years that
commence after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012. The IBEs and FirstBank Overseas
Corporation were created under the International Banking Entity Act of Puerto Rico, which provides
for total Puerto Rico tax exemption on net income derived by IBEs operating in Puerto Rico. IBEs
that operate as a unit of a bank pay income taxes at normal rates to the extent that the IBEs net
income exceeds 20% of the banks total net taxable income.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized an income tax
expense of $1.2 million, compared to an income tax benefit of $21.0 million recorded for the same
period in 2008. The recognition of an income tax expense for 2009 mainly resulted from a non-cash
charge of approximately $152.2 million to increase the valuation allowance for the Corporations
deferred tax asset. Accounting for income taxes requires that companies assess whether a
valuation allowance should be recorded against their deferred tax assets based on the consideration
of all available evidence, using a more likely than not realization standard. The valuation
allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. In making such assessment, significant weight is to be given to evidence
that can be objectively verified, including both positive and negative evidence. The accounting
for income taxes guidance requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to
realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences,
future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable
income in carryback years and tax planning strategies.
In assessing the weight of positive and negative evidence, a significant negative factor was
that the Corporations banking subsidiary FirstBank Puerto Rico is in a three-year historical
cumulative loss as of the end of the third quarter of 2009, mainly as a result of charges to the
provision for loan and lease losses during 2009 arising from the impact of the economic downturn.
This, combined with uncertain near-term market and economic conditions, reduced the Corporations
ability to rely on projections of future taxable
75
income in assessing the realization of its
deferred tax assets and resulted in the increase of the valuation allowance to $157 million as of
September 30, 2009. Management however, has also concluded that $108.0 million of the deferred tax
assets will be realized. In assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets, management has
considered all four sources of taxable income mentioned above and has identified several
tax-planning strategies as the main source of taxable income to realize the deferred tax asset
amount. Management will continue reassessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets in
future periods. If future events differ from managements September 30, 2009 assessment,
additional valuation allowance may need to be established which may have a material adverse
effect on the Corporations results of operations. Similarly, to the extent the realization of a
portion, or all, of the tax asset becomes more likely than not based on changes in circumstances
(such as, improved earnings, changes in tax laws or other relevant changes), a reversal of that
portion of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance will then be recorded.
The increase in the valuation allowance does not have any impact on the Corporations
liquidity, nor does such an allowance preclude the Corporation from using tax losses, tax credits
or other deferred tax assets in the future. The increase in the valuation allowance is not a
result of a change in managements view of the Corporations near or long-term outlook.
Partially offsetting the impact of the increase in the valuation allowance, was the reversal
of approximately $19 million of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (UTBs) as further discussed below. The
income tax provision in 2009 was also impacted by adjustments to deferred tax amounts as a result
of the aforementioned changes to the PR Code enacted tax rates. The effect of a higher temporary
statutory tax rate over the normal statutory tax rate resulted in an additional income tax benefit
of $9.8 million for the first nine months of 2009 that was partially offset by an income tax
provision of $5.6 million related to the special 5% tax on the operations FirstBank Overseas
Corporation. Deferred tax amounts have been adjusted for the effect of the change in the income tax
rate considering the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the period in which
the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or realized.
As of September 30, 2009, the deferred tax asset, net of a valuation allowance of $157
million, amounted to $108.0 million compared to $128.0 million as of December 31, 2008.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Corporation reversed UTBs by $10.8 million and related
accrued interest of $5.3 million due to the lapse of the statute of limitations for the 2004
taxable year. Also, in July 2009, the Corporation entered into an agreement with the Puerto Rico
Department of the Treasury to conclude an income tax audit and to eliminate all possible income and
withholding tax deficiencies related to taxable years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. As a result of
such agreement, the Corporation reversed during the third quarter of 2009 the remaining UTBs and
related interest by
approximately $2.9 million, net of the payment made to the Puerto Rico Department of the
Treasury in connection with the conclusion of the tax audit. There were no UTBs outstanding as of
September 30, 2009. Refer to Note 17 to the accompanying notes to the unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
76
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND OPERATING DATA ANALYSIS
Assets
Total assets as of September 30, 2009
amounted to $20.1 billion, an increase of $589.9 million
compared to total assets as of December 31, 2008. The increase in total assets was primarily a
result of an increase of $477.9 million in total loans (net of an increase of $190 million in the
allowance for loan and lease losses), partially offset by a decrease of $189.6 million in cash and
cash equivalent funds used to pay down maturing borrowings and a decrease of $154.1 million in
investment securities due to the aforementioned sales. However, as of September 30, 2009, there was
an unsettled sale of MBS amounting to approximately $465 million that is still reported as an asset
(account receivable) at the end of the quarter. Refer to the Loan portfolio and Investment
Activities discussion below for additional information.
Loan Portfolio
The composition of the Corporations loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, as of the
dates indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
$ |
3,620,050 |
|
|
$ |
3,491,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans |
|
|
1,570,451 |
|
|
|
1,526,995 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
1,542,934 |
|
|
|
1,535,758 |
|
Commercial and Industrial loans |
|
|
4,738,080 |
|
|
|
3,857,728 |
|
Loans to local financial institutions
collaterilized by real estate mortgages |
|
|
329,492 |
|
|
|
567,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
8,180,957 |
|
|
|
7,488,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
329,418 |
|
|
|
363,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other loans |
|
|
1,625,743 |
|
|
|
1,744,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,756,168 |
|
|
$ |
13,088,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations total loans increased by $667.9 million, when
compared with the balance as of December 31, 2008. The increase in the Corporations total loans
primarily relates to increases in C&I loans driven by internal loan originations, mainly to the
Puerto Rico Government as further discussed below, partially offset by repayments and charge-offs
of approximately $252.7 million recorded in the nine months of 2009, mainly construction loans in
Florida.
Of the total gross loan portfolio of $13.8 billion as of September 30, 2009, approximately 82%
has regional credit risk concentration in Puerto Rico, 10% in the United States (mainly in the
state of Florida) and 8% in the Virgin Islands, as shown in the following table.
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto |
|
|
Virgin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
Rico |
|
|
Islands |
|
|
Florida |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Residential mortgage loans, including
loans held for sale |
|
$ |
2,781,401 |
|
|
$ |
450,154 |
|
|
$ |
388,495 |
|
|
$ |
3,620,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans (1) |
|
|
971,223 |
|
|
|
193,613 |
|
|
|
405,615 |
|
|
|
1,570,451 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
958,741 |
|
|
|
73,606 |
|
|
|
510,587 |
|
|
|
1,542,934 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
4,475,769 |
|
|
|
230,322 |
|
|
|
31,989 |
|
|
|
4,738,080 |
|
Loans to local financial institutions collateralized by real estate mortgages |
|
|
329,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
6,735,225 |
|
|
|
497,541 |
|
|
|
948,191 |
|
|
|
8,180,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases |
|
|
329,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans |
|
|
1,483,360 |
|
|
|
105,342 |
|
|
|
37,041 |
|
|
|
1,625,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross |
|
$ |
11,329,404 |
|
|
$ |
1,053,037 |
|
|
$ |
1,373,727 |
|
|
$ |
13,756,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Construction loans of the Florida operations include approximately $141.1 million of condo-conversion loans,
net of charge-offs of $62.9 million recorded in 2009. |
Loan Production
First BanCorp relies primarily on its retail network of branches to originate residential and
consumer loans. The Corporation supplements its residential mortgage loan originations with
wholesale servicing released mortgage loan purchases from mortgage bankers. The Corporation
manages its construction and commercial loan originations through a centralized unit and most of
its originations come from existing customers as well as through referrals and direct
solicitations. For commercial loan originations, the Corporation also has regional offices to
provide services to designated territories.
Total loan production, including purchases and refinancings, for the quarter and nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009 was $1.4 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively, compared to $1.2
billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, for the comparable periods in 2008. The increase in loan
production for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, as compared to the same periods in
2008, was mainly associated with credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government. During
the third quarter of 2009, credit facilities to the Puerto Rico Government of $689 million includes
a $500 million facility extended to the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. (COFINA under its
Spanish acronym), an instrumentality of the Government of Puerto Rico, and $189 million extended
through a revolving credit facility. The latter is part of the Corporations participation of up
to $300 million in a syndicate structured by another financial institution to support the
Commonwealths 2010 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (TRANs) program. Another $500 million
facility was extended to COFINA in the first half of 2009, but has
already been repaid. Despite the
present economic climate, the Corporations residential mortgage loan originations, including
purchases of approximately $45.6 million for the quarter and $163 million for the nine months of
2009, amounted to $129.5 million and $453.5 million for the third quarter and nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The aforementioned figures exclude the purchase of
approximately $205 million of residential
mortgage loans that previously served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G, as
discussed below, since the Corporation believes this approach provides a better representation of
the Corporations residential mortgage loan production capacity.
78
The following table details First BanCorps loan production for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine-month Period Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate |
|
$ |
129,527 |
|
|
$ |
168,808 |
|
|
$ |
453,465 |
|
|
$ |
560,168 |
|
Commercial and construction |
|
|
1,159,021 |
|
|
|
603,542 |
|
|
|
2,709,500 |
|
|
|
1,941,416 |
|
Finance leases |
|
|
20,565 |
|
|
|
29,131 |
|
|
|
60,387 |
|
|
|
87,217 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
138,570 |
|
|
|
374,556 |
|
|
|
391,608 |
|
|
|
652,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan production |
|
$ |
1,447,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,037 |
|
|
$ |
3,614,960 |
|
|
$ |
3,240,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations residential real estate loan portfolio increased
by $128.3 million as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008. More than 90% of the
Corporations outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans consists of fixed-rate, fully
amortizing, full documentation loans. In accordance with the Corporations underwriting
guidelines, residential real estate loans are mostly full documented loans, and the Corporation is
not actively involved in the origination of negative amortization loans or adjustable-rate mortgage
loans. The increase was driven by a portfolio acquired during the second quarter of 2009 from R&G,
a Puerto Rican financial institution, and new loan originations during 2009. The R&G transaction
involved the purchase of approximately $205 million of residential mortgage loans that previously
served as collateral for a commercial loan extended to R&G. The purchase price of the transaction
was retained by the Corporation to fully pay off the loan, thereby significantly reducing the
Corporations exposure to a single borrower. This acquisition had the effect of improving the
Corporations regulatory capital ratios due to the lower risk-weighting of the assets acquired.
Additionally, net interest income improves since the weighted-average effective yield on the
mortgage loans acquired approximates 5.38% (including non-performing loans) compared to a yield of
approximately 150 basis points over 3-month LIBOR in the commercial loan to R&G. Partially
offsetting the increase driven by the aforementioned transaction and loan originations was the
securitization of approximately $262 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. Refer to the
Contractual Obligations and Commitments discussion below for additional information about
outstanding commitments to sell mortgage loans.
Commercial and Construction Loans
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations commercial and construction loan portfolio
increased by $692.8 million, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008, due mainly to loan
originations to the Puerto Rico Government as discussed above, partially offset by the
aforementioned unwinding transaction with R&G, principal repayments and net charge-offs in 2009. A
substantial portion of this portfolio is collateralized by real estate. The Corporations
commercial loans are primarily variable- and adjustable-rate loans.
The Corporations largest loan concentration to one borrower as of September 30, 2009 amounted
to approximately $689 million in credit facilities extended to the Puerto Rico Government. The
next largest loan concentration to one borrower of $329.5 million is with one mortgage originator
in Puerto Rico, Doral Financial Corporation. This commercial loan is secured by individual
mortgage loans on residential and commercial real estate.
79
The Corporations construction lending volume has been stagnant for the last year due to the
slowdown in the U.S. housing market and the current economic environment in Puerto Rico. The
Corporation has reduced its exposure to condo-conversion loans in its
Florida operations, and
construction loan originations in Puerto Rico are mainly draws on existing commitments. Current
absorption rates in condo-conversion loans in the United States are low and properties
collateralizing some of these condo-conversion loans have been formally reverted to rental
properties with a future plan for the sale of converted units upon an improvement in the real
estate market. As of September 30, 2009, approximately $47.5 million of loans originally disbursed
as condo-conversion construction loans have been formally reverted to income-producing commercial
loans, while the repayment of interest on the remaining construction condo-conversion loans is
coming principally from rental income and other sources. Given more conservative underwriting
standards of banks in general and a reduction of market participants in the lending business, the
Corporation believes that the rental market will grow.
The Puerto Rico housing market has not seen the dramatic decline in housing prices that is
affecting the U.S. mainland; however, there is currently an oversupply of housing units compounded
by a lower demand for and declining volume of sales of new housing units and diminished consumer
purchasing power and confidence. The unemployment rate in Puerto Rico tops 16%.
80
The composition of the Corporations construction loan portfolio as of September 30, 2009 by
category and geographic location follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto |
|
|
Virgin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
Rico |
|
|
Islands |
|
|
Florida |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans for residential housing projects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High-rise (1) |
|
$ |
196,760 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
559 |
|
|
$ |
197,319 |
|
Mid-rise (2) |
|
|
102,026 |
|
|
|
3,344 |
|
|
|
43,783 |
|
|
|
149,153 |
|
Single-family detach |
|
|
116,123 |
|
|
|
5,247 |
|
|
|
34,754 |
|
|
|
156,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for residential housing projects |
|
|
414,909 |
|
|
|
8,591 |
|
|
|
79,096 |
|
|
|
502,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans to individuals secured by residential
properties |
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
|
30,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,631 |
|
Condo-conversion loans |
|
|
8,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,143 |
|
|
|
149,477 |
|
Loans for commercial projects |
|
|
314,837 |
|
|
|
110,706 |
|
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
434,619 |
|
Bridge loans residential |
|
|
55,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
56,498 |
|
Bridge loans commercial |
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
20,827 |
|
|
|
72,418 |
|
|
|
96,248 |
|
Land loans residential |
|
|
78,194 |
|
|
|
21,246 |
|
|
|
75,104 |
|
|
|
174,544 |
|
Land loans commercial |
|
|
61,852 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
27,575 |
|
|
|
90,519 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
28,058 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before net deferred fees and allowance for loan
losses |
|
|
975,294 |
|
|
|
194,206 |
|
|
|
405,697 |
|
|
|
1,575,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred fees |
|
|
(4,071 |
) |
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(4,746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, gross |
|
|
971,223 |
|
|
|
193,613 |
|
|
|
405,615 |
|
|
|
1,570,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(76,904 |
) |
|
|
(14,344 |
) |
|
|
(53,590 |
) |
|
|
(144,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total construction loan portfolio, net |
|
$ |
894,319 |
|
|
$ |
179,269 |
|
|
$ |
352,025 |
|
|
$ |
1,425,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of the above table, high-rise portfolio is composed of buildings with more than 7 stories, mainly composed of two
projects that represent approximately 72% of the Corporations total outstanding high-rise residential construction loan portfolio
in Puerto Rico. |
|
(2) |
|
Mid-rise relates to buildings of up to 7 stories. |
The following table presents further information on the Corporations construction portfolio
as of and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undisbursed funds under existing commitments |
|
$ |
341,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction loans in non-accrual status |
|
$ |
609,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge offs Construction loans (1) |
|
$ |
138,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses Construction loans |
|
$ |
144,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing construction loans to total construction loans |
|
|
38.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses construction loans to total construction loans |
|
|
9.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (annualized) to total average construction loans (1) |
|
|
11.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes charge-offs of $94.3 million related to construction loans in Florida and $44.4 million related to construction loans in Puerto Rico. |
The following summarizes the construction loans for residential housing projects in Puerto
Rico segregated by the estimated selling price of the units:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Under $300k |
|
$ |
135,461 |
|
$300k - $600k |
|
|
84,973 |
|
Over $600k (1) |
|
|
194,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
414,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mainly composed of three high-rise projects that accounts for approximately 64% of the residential housing projects in Puerto Rico
with estimated selling prices of over $600,000. |
For the majority of the construction loans for residential housing projects in Florida, the
estimated selling price of the units is under $300,000.
81
Consumer Loans and Finance Leases
As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations consumer loan and finance leases portfolio
decreased by $153.2 million, as compared to the portfolio balance as of December 31, 2008. This is
mainly the result of repayments and charge-offs that on a combined basis more than offset the
volume of loan originations during the nine months of 2009. Nevertheless, the Corporation
experienced a decrease in net charge-offs for consumer loans and finance leases that amounted to
$45.9 million for the first nine months of 2009, as compared to $47.5 million for the same period a
year ago. The decrease in net charge offs as compared to 2008 is attributable to the relative
stability in the credit quality of this portfolio and changes in underwriting standards implemented
in late 2005, which resulted in new originations under these revised standards, that replaced
maturing consumer loans having average lives of approximately four years.
Consumer loan originations are principally driven through the Corporations retail network.
For the third quarter and nine months of 2009, consumer loan originations decreased by $236.0
million and $260.6 million, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2008, adversely impacted
by economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States.
Investment Activities
As part of its strategy to diversify its revenue sources and maximize its net interest income,
First BanCorp maintains an investment portfolio that is classified as available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity. The Corporations investment portfolio as of September 30, 2009 amounted to $5.6
billion, a reduction of $138.1 million when compared with the investment portfolio of $5.7 billion
as of December 31, 2008. The reduction in the investment portfolio was the net result of
approximately $1.5 billion in securities sales, $937 million in calls of U.S. agency notes, and
approximately $790 million of mortgage-backed securities pre-payments; partly offset with
securities purchases of $2.9 billion.
The first nine months of the year saw sales of approximately $1.4 billion in MBS (mainly
30-Year U.S. agency MBS with a weighted-average coupon of 5.58%), and $96 million of US Treasury
notes. Also, during 2009, the Corporation began and completed the securitization of approximately
$262 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS.
Purchases of investment securities during 2009 mainly consist of U.S. agency callable
debentures having contractual maturities ranging from two to three years (approximately $1.0
billion at a weighted-average yield of 2.13%), 7-10 Year U.S. Treasury Notes (approximately $96
million at a weighted-average yield of 3.54%) subsequently sold, 15-Year U.S. agency MBS
(approximately $1.3 billion at a weighted-average yield of 3.85%) and floating collateralized
mortgage obligations issued by GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC (approximately $184 million).
Over 95% of the Corporations available-for-sale and held to maturity securities portfolio is
invested in U.S. Government and Agency debentures and fixed-rate U.S. government sponsored-agency
MBS (mainly FNMA and FHLMC fixed-rate securities). The Corporations investment in equity
securities is minimal, and it relates to other financial institutions in Puerto Rico.
82
The following table presents the carrying value of investments at the indicated dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market investments |
|
$ |
91,991 |
|
|
$ |
76,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations |
|
|
16,830 |
|
|
|
953,516 |
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations |
|
|
23,476 |
|
|
|
23,069 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
602,794 |
|
|
|
728,079 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,100 |
|
|
|
1,706,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations |
|
|
1,148,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations |
|
|
145,813 |
|
|
|
137,133 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
3,459,943 |
|
|
|
3,722,992 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,754,989 |
|
|
|
3,862,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other equity securities, including $77.3 million and $62.6 million of FHLB stock
as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
78,930 |
|
|
|
64,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
$ |
5,571,010 |
|
|
$ |
5,709,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities at the indicated dates consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates |
|
$ |
5,698 |
|
|
$ |
8,338 |
|
FNMA certificates |
|
|
597,096 |
|
|
|
719,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
602,794 |
|
|
|
728,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLMC certificates |
|
|
1,073,245 |
|
|
|
1,892,358 |
|
GNMA certificates |
|
|
397,133 |
|
|
|
342,674 |
|
FNMA certificates |
|
|
1,734,652 |
|
|
|
1,373,977 |
|
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations issued or guaranteed by FHLMC and GNMA |
|
|
162,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other mortgage pass-through certificates |
|
|
92,086 |
|
|
|
113,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,459,943 |
|
|
|
3,722,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
4,062,737 |
|
|
$ |
4,451,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
The carrying values of investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
as of September 30, 2009 by contractual maturity (excluding mortgage-backed securities and equity
securities) are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Weighted |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Average Yield % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agencies obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
8,470 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
1,148,662 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165,492 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Puerto Rico Government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
|
11,880 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
113,751 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
25,398 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
18,260 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,289 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,336,781 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
4,062,737 |
|
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale and held to maturity |
|
$ |
5,400,089 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income of future periods will be affected by the acceleration in prepayments of
mortgage-backed securities experienced during the year, the calls of the Agency notes, and the
subsequent re-investment at lower then current yields. Also, net interest income in future periods
might be affected by the Corporations investment in callable securities. Approximately $937
million of U.S. Agency debentures with an average yield of 5.77% were called during 2009. As of
September 30, 2009, the Corporation has approximately $1.2 billion in U.S. agency debentures with
embedded calls and with an average yield of 2.20% (mainly securities with contractual maturities of
2-3 years acquired in 2009). These risks are directly linked to future period market interest rate
fluctuations. Refer to the Risk Management section below for further analysis of the
effects of changing interest rates on the Corporations net interest income and for the interest
rate risk management strategies followed by the Corporation. Also refer to Note 4 to the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the
Corporations investment portfolio.
84
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risks are inherent in virtually all aspects of the Corporations business activities and
operations. Consequently, effective risk management is fundamental to the success of the
Corporation. The primary goals of risk management are to ensure that the Corporations risk taking
activities are consistent with the Corporations objectives and risk tolerance and that there is an
appropriate balance between risk and reward in order to maximize stockholder value.
The Corporation has in place a risk management framework to monitor, evaluate and manage the
principal risks assumed in conducting its activities. First BanCorps business is subject to eight
broad categories of risks: (1) liquidity risk, (2) interest rate risk, (3) market risk, (4) credit
risk, (5) operational risk, (6) legal and compliance risk, (7) reputational risk, and (8)
contingency risk. First BanCorp has adopted policies and procedures designed to identify and manage
risks to which the Corporation is exposed, specifically those relating to liquidity risk, interest
rate risk, credit risk, and operational risk.
The Corporations risk management policies are described below as well as in the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of First BanCorps
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Adequacy
Liquidity is the ongoing ability to accommodate liability maturities and deposit withdrawals,
fund asset growth and business operations, and meet contractual obligations through unconstrained
access to funding at reasonable market rates. Liquidity management involves forecasting funding
requirements and maintaining sufficient capacity to meet the needs and accommodate fluctuations in
asset and liability levels due to changes in the Corporations business operations or unanticipated
events.
The Corporation manages liquidity at two levels. The first is the liquidity of the parent
company, which is the holding company that owns the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The
second is the liquidity of the banking subsidiary. The Asset and Liability Committee of the Board
of Directors is responsible for establishing the Corporations liquidity policy as well as
approving operating and contingency procedures, and monitoring liquidity on an ongoing basis. The
Managements Investment and Asset Liability Committee (MIALCO), using measures of liquidity
developed by management, which involve the use of several assumptions, reviews the Corporations
liquidity position on a monthly basis. The MIALCO oversees liquidity management, interest rate risk
and other related matters. The MIALCO, which reports to the Board of Directors Asset and Liability
Committee, is composed of senior management officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Risk Officer, the Wholesale Banking Executive, the Risk Manager
of the Treasury and Investments Division, the Asset/Liability Manager and the Treasurer. The
Treasury and Investments Division is responsible for planning and executing the Corporations
funding activities and strategy; monitors liquidity availability on a daily basis and reviews
liquidity measures on a weekly basis. The Treasury and Investments Accounting and Operations area
of the Comptrollers Department is responsible for calculating the
85
liquidity measurements used by the Treasury and Investment Division to review the
Corporations liquidity position.
In order to ensure adequate liquidity through the full range of potential operating
environments and market conditions, the Corporation conducts its liquidity management and business
activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance funding stability, flexibility and diversity.
Key components of this operating strategy include a strong focus on the continued development of
customer-based funding, maintaining direct relationships with wholesale market funding providers,
and maintaining the ability to liquidate certain assets when, and if, requirements warrant.
The Corporation develops and maintains contingency funding plans for both the parent company
and bank liquidity positions. These plans evaluate the Corporations liquidity position under
various operating circumstances and allow the Corporation to ensure that it will be able to operate
through periods of stress when access to normal sources of funding is constrained. The plans
project funding requirements during a potential period of stress specify and quantify sources of
liquidity, outline actions and procedures for effectively managing through a difficult period, and
define roles and responsibilities. In the Contingency Funding Plan, the Corporation stresses the
balance sheet and the liquidity position to critical levels that imply difficulties in getting new
funds or even maintaining its current funding position, thereby ensuring the ability to honor its
commitments, and establishing liquidity triggers monitored by the MIALCO in order to maintain the
ordinary funding of the banking business. Three different scenarios are defined in the Contingency
Funding Plan: local market event, credit rating downgrade, and a concentration event. They are
reviewed and approved annually by the Board of Directors Asset and Liability Committee.
During
the third quarter of 2009, the Corporation continued to manage its liquidity in a
proactive manner, and maintained a position believed to be more than adequate to face its expected
and unexpected needs. Multiple measures are utilized to monitor the liquidity position, including
basic surplus and volatile liabilities measures. Among the actions taken in recent months to
bolster the liquidity position and to safeguard its access to credit was, the posting of
additional collateral to the FHLB and to the FED, thereby increasing borrowing capacity. The
Corporation has also maintained the basic surplus (cash, short-term assets minus short-term
liabilities, and secured lines of credit) well in excess of the self-imposed minimum limit of 5% of
total assets. As of September 30, 2009, the estimated basic surplus ratio of approximately 11.2%
included un-pledged assets, FHLB lines of credit, collateral pledged at the Federal Reserve Bank
Borrower in Custody Program, and cash. At the end of the quarter, the Corporation has $1.4 billion
of FHLB and FED unused borrowing capacity. Un-pledged liquid securities as of September 30, 2009 mainly
consisted of fixed-rate MBS and U.S. agency debentures totaling approximately $677.6 million, which
can be sold under agreements to repurchase. The Corporation does not rely on uncommitted inter-bank
lines of credit (federal funds lines) to fund its operations and does not include them in the basic
surplus computation.
Sources of Funding
The Corporation utilizes different sources of funding to help ensure that adequate levels of
liquidity are available when needed. Diversification of funding sources is of great importance to
protect the Corporations liquidity from market disruptions. The
86
principal sources of short-term funds are deposits, securities sold under agreements to
repurchase, and lines of credit with the FHLB and the FED Discount Window Program. The Asset
Liability Committee of the Board of Directors reviews credit availability on a regular basis. The
Corporation has also securitized and sold mortgage loans as a supplementary source of funding.
Commercial paper has also in the past provided additional funding. Long-term funding has also been
obtained through the issuance of notes and, to a lesser extent, long-term brokered CDs. The cost of
these different alternatives, among other things, is taken into consideration.
Recent initiatives by the FED to ease the credit crisis have included, among other things,
cuts to the discount rate, the availability of the Term Auction Facility (TAF) to provide
short-term loans to banks and expanding the qualifying collateral it will lend against, to include
commercial paper. The FDIC also raised the cap on deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to
$250,000 until December 31, 2013. These actions made the federal government a viable source of
funding in the current environment.
The Corporations principal sources of funding are:
Brokered CDs A large portion of the Corporations funding is retail brokered CDs issued by the
Bank subsidiary, FirstBank Puerto Rico. Total brokered CDs decreased from $8.4 billion at
year-end 2008 to $7.5 billion as of September 30, 2009. The Corporation has been partly
refinancing brokered CDs that matured or were called during 2009 with alternate sources of
funding at a lower cost. Approximately $6.4 billion of brokered CDs matured or were called
during the first nine months of 2009, of which approximately $1.2 billion were, as of September
30, replaced with advances from the FHLB and from the FED as well as short-term repurchase
agreements to decrease interest expense.
In the event that the Corporations Bank subsidiary falls below the ratios of a well-capitalized
institution, it faces the risk of not being able to replace funding through this source. The Bank
currently complies and exceeds the minimum requirements of ratios for a well-capitalized
institution and does not foresee falling below required levels to issue brokered deposits. The
average remaining term to maturity of the retail brokered CDs outstanding as of September 30,
2009 is approximately 0.8 years.
The use of brokered CDs has been important for the growth of the Corporation. The Corporation
encounters intense competition in attracting and retaining regular retail deposits in Puerto
Rico. The brokered CDs market is very competitive and liquid, and the Corporation has been able
to obtain substantial amounts of funding in short periods of time. This strategy enhances the
Corporations liquidity position, since the brokered CDs are insured by the FDIC up to regulatory
limits and can be obtained faster compared to regular retail deposits. Demand for brokered CDs
has remained robust enough to fulfill the Corporations needs for issuance of new and replacement
transactions. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation issued $5.5
billion in brokered CDs at an average rate of 0.79% (including the rollover of short-term
brokered CDs and replacement of brokered CDs called).
87
The following table presents a maturity summary of brokered and retail CDs with
denominations of $100,000 or higher as of September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
2,957,838 |
|
Over three months to six months |
|
|
1,566,135 |
|
Over six months to one year |
|
|
1,899,672 |
|
Over one year |
|
|
1,897,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,320,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or higher include brokered CDs of $7.5 billion
issued to deposit brokers in the form of large ($100,000 or more) certificates of deposit that are
generally participated out by brokers in shares of less than $100,000 and are therefore insured by
the FDIC. Certificates of deposit also include $17.2 million of deposits through the Certificate of
Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS). In an effort to meet customer needs and provide its
customers with the best products and services available, the Corporations bank subsidiary,
FirstBank Puerto Rico, has joined a program that gives depositors the opportunity to insure their
money beyond the standard FDIC coverage. CDARS can offer customers access to FDIC insurance
coverage of up to $50 million, when they enter into the CDARS Deposit Placement Agreement, while
earning attractive returns on their deposits.
Retail deposits The Corporations deposit products also include regular savings accounts, demand
deposit accounts, money market accounts and retail CDs. Total deposits, excluding brokered CDs,
increased by $177.1 million from the balance as of December 31, 2008, reflecting increases in
core-deposit products such as savings and interest-bearing checking accounts. In Puerto Rico, the
Corporations primary market, total deposits, excluding brokered CDs, increased by $235.4 million
from the balance as of December 31, 2008, reflecting successful marketing campaigns and
cross-selling initiatives. Refer to Note 10 in the accompanying unaudited financial statements for
further details.
Refer to the Net Interest Income discussion above for information about average balances of
interest-bearing deposits, and the average interest rate paid on deposits for the quarters and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase The Corporations investment portfolio is
substantially funded with repurchase agreements. Securities sold under repurchase agreements were
$3.8 billion on September 30, 2009, compared with $3.4 billion at December 31, 2008. One of the
Corporations strategies is the use of structured repurchase agreements and long-term repurchase
agreements to reduce exposure to interest rate risk by lengthening the final maturities of its
liabilities while keeping funding cost at reasonable levels. Of the total of $3.8 billion
repurchase agreements outstanding as of September 30, 2009, approximately $2.4 billion consist of
structured repos and $600 million of long-term repos. The access to this type of funding was
affected by the liquidity turmoil in the financial markets witnessed in the second half of 2008 and
in 2009. Certain counterparties have not been willing to enter into additional repurchase
agreements and the capacity to extend the term of maturing repurchase agreements has
also been reduced, however, the Corporation has been able to keep access to credit by
88
using cost effective sources such as FED and FHLB advances. Refer to Note 12 in the accompanying notes to the
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for further details about repurchase agreements
outstanding by counterparty and maturities.
Under the Corporations repurchase agreements, as is the case with derivative contracts, the
Corporation is required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To
the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of
changes in interest rates, a liquidity crisis or any other factor, the Corporation will be required
to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely
affecting its liquidity. Given the quality of the collateral pledged, the Corporation has not
experienced significant margin calls from counterparties recently arising from
credit-quality-related write-downs in valuations with only $1.5 million of cash deposited in
connection with collateralized interest rate swap agreements.
Advances from the FHLB The Corporations Bank subsidiary is a member of the FHLB system and
obtains advances to fund its operations under a collateral agreement with the FHLB that requires
the Bank to maintain minimum qualifying mortgages as collateral for advances taken. As of September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance of FHLB advances was $1.2 billion and $1.1
billion, respectively. Approximately $835.4 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB has
maturities over one year. As part of its precautionary initiatives to safeguard access to credit
and the low level of interest rates, the Corporation has been increasing its pledging of assets to
both the FHLB and the FED, while at the same time both counterparties have been revising their
credit guidelines and haircuts in the computation of availability of credit lines.
FED Discount window FED initiatives to ease the credit crisis have included cuts to the discount
rate, which was lowered from 4.75% to 0.50% through eight separate actions since December 2007, and
adjustments to previous practices to facilitate financing for longer periods. This makes the FED
Discount Window a viable source of funding given current market conditions. The Corporation
participates in the BIC Program of the FED and, as of September 30, 2009, approximately $1.0
billion in pledged collateral is available for additional credit under the BIC program, including auto loans
and commercial loans. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $700 million outstanding in
short-term borrowings from the FED Discount Window.
Credit Lines The Corporation maintains unsecured and un-committed lines of credit with other
banks. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations total unused lines of credit with other banks
amounted to $175 million. The Corporation has not used these lines of credit to fund its
operations.
Though currently not in use, other sources of short-term funding for the Corporation include
commercial paper and federal funds purchased. Furthermore, in previous years the Corporation has
entered into several financing transactions to diversify its funding sources, including the
issuance of notes payable and Junior subordinated debentures as part of its longer-term liquidity
and capital management activities. No assurance can be given that these sources of liquidity will
be available and if available will be on comparable terms. The Corporation continues to evaluate
its financing options, including available options resulting from recent federal government
initiatives to deal with the crisis in the financial markets.
89
The Corporations principal uses of funds are the origination of loans and the repayment of
maturing deposits and borrowings. Over the last five years, the Corporation has committed
substantial resources to its mortgage banking subsidiary, FirstMortgage Inc. As a result,
residential real estate loans as a percentage of total loans receivable have increased over time
from 14% at December 31, 2004 to 26% at September 30, 2009. Commensurate with the increase in its
mortgage banking activities, the Corporation has also invested in technology and personnel to
enhance the Corporations secondary mortgage market capabilities. The enhanced capabilities improve
the Corporations liquidity profile as they allow the Corporation to derive liquidity, if needed,
from the sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market. The U.S. (including Puerto Rico) secondary mortgage market is still
highly liquid in large part because of the sale or guarantee programs of the FHA, VA, HUD, FNMA and
FHLMC. The Corporation obtained from GNMA Commitment Authority to issue GNMA mortgage-backed
securities and under this program, the Corporation completed the securitization of approximately
$262 million of FHA/VA mortgage loans into GNMA MBS. Any regulatory actions affecting GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC could adversely
affect the secondary mortgage market.
90
Credit Ratings
The Corporations credit as long-term issuer is currently rated B by Standard & Poors (S&P)
and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (Fitch); both with negative outlook.
At the FirstBank subsidiary level, long-term senior debt is currently rated B1 by Moodys
Investor Service (Moodys), four notches below their definition of investment grade; B by S&P, and
B by Fitch, both five notches below their definition of investment grade. The outlook on the Banks
credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative.
The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be
affected by the recent credit downgrades. The Corporations liquidity is contingent upon its ability to
obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future downgrades in credit
ratings can hinder the Corporations access to external funding and/or cause external funding to be
more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of operations. Also, any change in
credit ratings may affect the fair value of certain liabilities and unsecured derivatives that
consider the Corporations own credit risk as part of the valuation.
Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents were
$216.1 million and $445.2 million at September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. These balances decreased by $189.6 million and increased by $66.2 million from
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The following discussion highlights the major activities
and transactions that affected the Corporations cash flows during the first nine months of 2009
and 2008.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
First BanCorps operating assets and liabilities vary significantly in the normal course of
business due to the amount and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from
operations, available cash balances and the Corporations ability to generate cash through short-
and long-term borrowings will be sufficient to fund the Corporations operating liquidity needs.
For the first nine months
of 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was $195.0
million. Net cash generated from operating activities was higher than net loss reported largely as
a result of adjustments for operating items such as the provision for loan and lease losses and due
to non-cash charges recorded to increase the Corporations valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets.
For the first nine months of 2008, net cash provided by operating activities was $142.8
million, which was higher than net income, mainly as a result of adjustments for operating items
such as the provision for loan and lease losses, depreciation expenses and amortization of
placement fees, partially offset by adjustments to net income from gain on sale of investments
(including the gain on the mandatory redemption of part of the Corporations investment in VISA in
March 2008), deferred income tax benefits and a decrease in accrued interest payable.
91
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
The Corporations investing activities primarily include originating loans to be held to
maturity and its available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolios. For the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009, net cash of $1.2 billion was used in investing activities,
primarily for loan origination disbursements and purchases of available-for-sale investment
securities to mitigate in part the impact of investments securities, mainly U.S. Agency debentures,
called by counterparties prior to maturity and MBS prepayments. Partially offsetting these uses of
cash were proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities as well as proceeds
from held-to-maturity securities called during 2009, and proceeds from loans and from MBS
repayments.
For the first nine months of 2008, net cash used in investing activities was
$2.2 billion, primarily due to loan origination disbursements and purchases of MBS that provided an attractive
yield given the interest rate scenario during the early part of 2008.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
The Corporations financing activities primarily include the receipt of deposits and issuance
of brokered CDs, the issuance and payments of long-term debt, the issuance of equity instruments
and activities related to its short-term funding. In addition, the Corporation paid monthly
dividends on its preferred stock and quarterly dividends on its common stock until it announced the
suspension of dividends beginning in August 2009. In the first nine months of 2009, net cash
provided by financing activities was $800 million due to the investment of $400 million by the
U.S. Treasury in preferred stock of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital Purchase
Program and due to the use of the FED Discount Window Program, advances from the FHLB and
short-term repurchase agreements to refinance brokered CDs at a lower cost and finance the
Corporations investing activities. Partially offsetting these cash proceeds was the payment of
cash dividends and pay down of maturing borrowings, in particular brokered CDs.
In the first nine months of 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was $2.1 billion
due to an increase in the Corporations deposit base and a net increase in securities sold under
repurchase agreements used to fund purchases of investment securities in 2008 as well as increases
in FED advances. Partially offsetting these cash inflows were funds used to pay dividends.
92
Capital
The Corporations stockholders equity amounted to $1.7 billion as of September 30, 2009, an
increase of $150.7 million compared to the balance as of December 31, 2008, driven by the $400
million investment by the U.S. Treasury in preferred stock of the Corporation through the TARP
Capital Purchase Program and an unrealized gain of $15.7 million on the fair value of
available-for-sale securities recorded as part of comprehensive income. Partially offsetting this
increase was the net loss of $222.0 million incurred in the first nine months of 2009 and dividends
amounting to $43.1 million for the first nine months of 2009 ($13.0 million in common stock, or
$0.14 per share, and $30.1 million in preferred stock).
On July 30, 2009, the Corporation announced
the suspension of dividends for common stock and all its
outstanding series of preferred stock. This suspension was effective with the dividends for the
month of August 2009 on the Corporations five outstanding series of non-cumulative preferred stock
and the dividends for the Corporations outstanding Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock and the
Corporations common stock. The Corporation took this prudent action to preserve capital as the
duration and depth of recessionary economic conditions is uncertain and consistent with federal
regulatory guidance.
As of September 30, 2009, First BanCorp and FirstBank Puerto Rico were in compliance with
regulatory capital requirements that were applicable to them as a financial holding company, a
state non-member bank and a thrift, respectively (i.e., total capital and Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets of at least 8% and 4%, respectively, and Tier 1 capital to average assets of
at least 4%). Set forth below are First BanCorps, and FirstBank Puerto Ricos regulatory capital
ratios as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, based on existing Federal Reserve and
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation guidelines. Effective July 1, the operations conducted by
FirstBank Florida as a separate subsidiary were merged with and into FirstBank Puerto Rico, the
Corporations main banking subsidiary. As part of the Corporations strategic planning it has been
determined that business synergies would be achieved by merging FirstBank Florida with and into
FirstBank Puerto Rico, which reorganization included the consolidation of FirstBank Puerto Ricos
loan production office with the former thrift banking operations of FirstBank Florida. For the
last three years prior to July 1, the Corporation conducted dual banking operations in the Florida market.
The consolidation of the former thrift banking operations with the
loan production office resulted in FirstBank Puerto Rico having a more diversified and efficient
banking operation in the form of a branch network in the Florida market. The merger allows the
Florida operations to benefit by leveraging the capital position of FirstBank Puerto Rico and
thereby provide it with the support necessary to grow in the Florida market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking subsidiary |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
|
|
To be well |
|
|
BanCorp |
|
FirstBank |
|
capitalized |
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
13.79 |
% |
|
|
13.08 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
12.52 |
% |
|
|
11.87 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
8.97 |
% |
|
|
8.49 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (Total capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
12.80 |
% |
|
|
12.23 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier 1 capital ratio (Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
11.55 |
% |
|
|
10.98 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Leverage ratio |
|
|
8.30 |
% |
|
|
7.90 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
The increase in regulatory capital ratios is mainly related to the $400 million investment by
the U.S. Treasury in preferred stock of the Corporation through the U.S. Treasury TARP Capital
Purchase Program. Refer to Note 16 of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
and Item 5 of the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for
additional information regarding this issuance. The funds were used in part to strengthen the
Corporations lending programs and ability to support growth strategies that are centered on
customers needs, including programs to preserve home ownership. Together with private and public
sector initiatives, the Corporation looks to support the local economy and the communities it
serves during the current economic environment.
The Corporation is well-capitalized, having sound margins over minimum well-capitalized
regulatory requirements. As of September 30, 2009, the total regulatory capital ratio is 13.8% and
the Tier 1 capital ratio is 12.5%. This translates to approximately $546 million and $938 million
of total capital and Tier 1 capital, respectively, in excess of the total capital and Tier 1
capital well capitalized requirements of 10% and 6%, respectively.
The Corporations tangible common equity ratio stands at 3.62% as of September 30, 2009,
compared to 4.87% as of December 31, 2008, and the Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets
ratio as of September 30, 2009 was 4.51% compared to 5.92% as of December 31, 2008.
The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share are non-GAAP
measures generally used by financial analysts and investment bankers to evaluate capital adequacy.
Tangible common equity is total equity less preferred equity, goodwill and core deposit
intangibles. Tangible Assets are total assets less goodwill and core deposit intangibles.
Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per
common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital
adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets,
typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method accounting for mergers and
acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders equity, total assets or any other
measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation
calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ
from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names. The following table is a
reconciliation of the Corporations tangible common equity and tangible assets for the periods
ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity per consolidated financial statements |
|
$ |
1,698,843 |
|
|
$ |
1,548,117 |
|
Preferred equity |
|
|
(927,374 |
) |
|
|
(550,100 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
(17,297 |
) |
|
|
(23,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity |
|
$ |
726,074 |
|
|
$ |
945,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets per consolidated financial statements |
|
$ |
20,081,185 |
|
|
$ |
19,491,268 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
(17,297 |
) |
|
|
(23,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets |
|
$ |
20,035,790 |
|
|
$ |
19,439,185 |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,543 |
|
|
|
92,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible common equity ratio |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
Tangible book value per common share |
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
10.22 |
|
The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is calculated by dividing (a) tier 1
capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock and qualifying
trust preferred securities, by (b) risk-weighted assets, which assets are calculated in accordance
with applicable bank regulatory requirements. The Tier 1 common equity ratio is not required by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, or on a recurring basis by applicable bank
regulatory requirements. However, this ratio was used by the Federal Reserve in connection with
its stress test administered to the 19 largest U.S. bank holding companies under the Supervisory
Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the results of which were announced on May 7, 2009. Management
is currently monitoring this ratio, along with the other ratios set forth in the table above, in
evaluating the Corporations capital levels and believes that, at this time, the ratio may be of
interest to investors.
94
The following table reconciles stockholders equity (GAAP) to Tier 1 common equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity per consolidated financial statements |
|
$ |
1,698,843 |
|
|
$ |
1,548,117 |
|
Qualifying preferred stock |
|
|
(927,374 |
) |
|
|
(550,100 |
) |
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (1) |
|
|
(73,095 |
) |
|
|
(57,389 |
) |
Disallowed deferred tax asset (2) |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
(69,810 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
Core deposit intangible |
|
|
(17,297 |
) |
|
|
(23,985 |
) |
Cumulative change gain in fair value of liabilities
accounted for under a fair value option |
|
|
(1,647 |
) |
|
|
(3,473 |
) |
Other disallowed assets |
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity |
|
$ |
649,097 |
|
|
$ |
814,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-weighted assets |
|
$ |
14,394,968 |
|
|
$ |
13,762,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio |
|
|
4.51 |
% |
|
|
5.92 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair
values, in accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines. In
arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to deduct net
unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily
determinable fair values, net of tax. |
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $112 million of the Corporations deferred tax assets at September 30, 2009
(December 31, 2008 $58 million) were included without limitation in
regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while
approximately $2 million of such assets at September 30, 2009 (December 31,
2008 $70 million) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and,
as disallowed deferred tax assets, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1
capital.According to regulatory capital guidelines, the deferred tax assets
that are dependent upon future taxable income are limited for inclusion in
Tier 1 capital to the lesser of: (i) the amount of such deferred tax asset
that the entity expects to realize within one year of the calendar quarter
end-date, based on its projected future taxable income for that year or (ii)
10% of the amount of the entitys Tier 1 capital.
|
|
|
Approximately $6 million of the Corporations other net deferred tax liability
at September 30, 2009 (December 31, 2008 $0) represented primarily the
deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt
securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of
net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. |
95
Off -Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are
not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are
different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. These transactions are
designed to (1) meet the financial needs of customers, (2) manage the Corporations credit, market
or liquidity risks, (3) diversify the Corporations funding sources and (4) optimize capital.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with
off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments
may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the
same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of
credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial
position. As of September 30, 2009, commitments to extend credit and commercial and financial
standby letters of credit amounted to approximately $1.6 billion and $102.9 million, respectively.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers as long as the conditions
established in the contract are met. Generally, the Corporations mortgage banking activities do
not enter into interest rate lock agreements with its prospective borrowers.
96
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table presents a detail of the maturities of the Corporations contractual
obligations and commitments, which consist of CDs, long-term contractual debt obligations,
commitments to sell mortgage loans and commitments to extend credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations and Commitments |
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
After 5 years |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit (1) |
|
$ |
8,953,779 |
|
|
$ |
6,908,782 |
|
|
$ |
1,734,772 |
|
|
$ |
303,436 |
|
|
$ |
6,789 |
|
Loans payable |
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
3,782,134 |
|
|
|
1,382,134 |
|
|
|
1,400,000 |
|
|
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Advances from FHLB |
|
|
1,200,440 |
|
|
|
365,000 |
|
|
|
617,000 |
|
|
|
218,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
26,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,140 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
14,894,843 |
|
|
$ |
9,355,916 |
|
|
$ |
3,765,163 |
|
|
$ |
1,221,876 |
|
|
$ |
551,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell mortgage loans |
|
$ |
77,152 |
|
|
$ |
77,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
$ |
102,920 |
|
|
$ |
102,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit |
|
$ |
1,174,005 |
|
|
$ |
1,174,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
55,190 |
|
|
|
55,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate loans |
|
|
343,766 |
|
|
|
343,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments |
|
$ |
1,572,961 |
|
|
$ |
1,572,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $7.5 billion of brokered CDs generally sold by third-party intermediaries in denominations of $100,000 or less, within FDIC
insurance limits and $17.2 million in CDARS. |
The Corporation has obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, such
as debt and lease agreements, and under other commitments to sell mortgage loans at fair value and
commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as
long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Other contractual
obligations result mainly from contracts for the rental and maintenance of equipment. Since certain
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. For most of the commercial lines of credit, the
Corporation has the option to reevaluate the agreement prior to additional disbursements. There
have been no significant or unexpected draws on existing commitments. The funding needs of
customers
have not significantly changed as a result of the latest market disruptions. In the case of
credit cards and personal lines of credit, the Corporation can at any time and without cause cancel
the unused credit facility. In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into
operating leases and other commercial commitments. There have been no significant changes in such
contractual obligations since December 31, 2008.
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. (Lehman) was the counterparty to the Corporation on
certain interest rate swap agreements. During the third quarter of 2008, Lehman failed to pay the
scheduled net cash settlement due to the Corporation, which constitutes an event of default under
those interest rate swap agreements. The Corporation terminated all interest rate swaps with Lehman
and replaced them with other counterparties under similar terms and conditions. In connection with
the unpaid net cash settlement due as of September 30, 2009, under the swap agreements, the
Corporation has
97
an unsecured counterparty exposure with Lehman, which filed for bankruptcy on
October 3, 2008, of approximately $1.4 million. This exposure was reserved in the third quarter of
2008. The Corporation had pledged collateral of $63.6 million with Lehman to guarantee its
performance under the swap agreements in the event payment thereunder was required. The book value
of pledged securities with Lehman as of September 30, 2009 amounted to approximately $64.5 million.
The position of the Corporation with respect to the recovery of the collateral, after discussion
with its outside legal counsel, is that at all times title to the collateral has been vested in the
Corporation and that, therefore, this collateral should not, for any purpose, be considered
property of the bankruptcy estate available for distribution among Lehmans creditors. . In this
regard the Corporation, together with its outside legal counsel, is evaluating courses of action it
may pursue in its attempt to recover the collateral. On January 30, 2009, the Corporation filed a
customer claim with the trustee and at this time the Corporation is unable to determine the timing
of the claim resolution or whether it will succeed in recovering all or a substantial portion of
the collateral or its equivalent value. As additional relevant facts become available in future
periods, a need to recognize a partial or full reserve of this claim may arise. Considering that
the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite its efforts in
this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing during the
second quarter of 2009.
Interest Rate Risk Management
First BanCorp manages its asset/liability position in order to limit the effects of changes in
interest rates on net interest income and to maintain stability in profitability under varying
interest rate environments. The MIALCO oversees interest rate risk and meetings focus on, among
other things, current and expected conditions in world financial markets, competition and
prevailing rates in the local deposit market, liquidity, unrealized gains and losses in securities,
recent or proposed changes to the investment portfolio, alternative funding sources and their
costs, hedging and the possible purchase of derivatives such as swaps and caps, and any tax or
regulatory issues which may be pertinent to these areas. The MIALCO approves funding decisions in
light of the Corporations overall growth strategies and objectives.
The Corporation performs on a quarterly basis a consolidated net interest income simulation
analysis to estimate the potential change in future earnings from projected changes in interest
rates. These simulations are carried out over a one-year to a five-year time horizon, assuming
gradual upward and downward interest rate movements of 200
basis points, achieved during a twelve-month period. Simulations are carried out in two ways:
(1) using a static balance sheet as the Corporation had on the simulation date, and
(2) using a growing balance sheet based on recent growth patterns and strategies.
The balance sheet is divided into groups of assets and liabilities detailed by maturity or
re-pricing and their corresponding interest yields and costs. As interest rates rise or fall, these
simulations incorporate expected future lending rates, current and expected future funding sources
and costs, the possible exercise of options, changes in prepayment rates, deposits decay and other
factors which may be important in projecting the future growth of net interest income.
98
The Corporation uses a simulation model to project future movements in the Corporations
balance sheet and income statement. The starting point of the projections generally corresponds to
the actual values on the balance sheet on the date of the simulations.
These simulations are highly complex, and use many simplifying assumptions that are intended
to reflect the general behavior of the Corporation over the period in question. It is highly
unlikely that actual events will match these assumptions in all cases. For this reason, the results
of these simulations are only approximations of the true sensitivity of net interest income to
changes in market interest rates.
The following table presents the results of the simulations as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. Consistent with prior years, these exclude non-cash changes in the fair value
of derivatives and liabilities elected to be measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) |
|
Net Interest Income Risk (Projected for the next 12 months) |
|
|
Static Simulation |
|
Growing Balance Sheet |
|
Static Simulation |
|
Growing Balance Sheet |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ 200 bps ramp |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
% |
- 200 bps ramp |
|
$ |
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.72 |
)% |
|
$ |
(32.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.31 |
)% |
|
$ |
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.77 |
)% |
|
$ |
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.15 |
)% |
The Corporations loan and investment portfolios are subject to prepayment risk, which results
from the ability of a third party to repay their debt obligations prior to maturity. In a rising
rate scenario, the prepayment risk in our U.S. government agency fixed-rate MBS portfolio is
expected to decrease substantially.
A recent drop in mortgage prepayments, as well as future prepayments estimates, suggests
longer expected lives of MBS than estimated earlier in the year, which in turn places the
Corporations balance sheet in a liability-sensitive position in terms of interest rate risk. In an
effort to mitigate such risk, and taking advantage of favorable market valuations, approximately
$613 million of 30-year U.S. Agency MBS and $98 million of (7 10 Year) US Treasury Notes were
sold during the third quarter of 2009. In addition, during 2009, the
Corporation has continued to
change the mix of its funding sources to better match the expected lengthening in the average
life of the investment portfolio. Current short-term rates on repurchase agreements, FHLB advances,
in conjunction with the participation in the BIC program of the FED, which allows the pledging of
loans as
collateral for borrowings at the FED Discount Window, allowed the
Corporation to increase the use of these low-cost funding sources. Proceeds from prepayments on
mortgage-backed securities have been re-invested in instruments with shorter durations, such as
U.S. agency callable debentures with contractual maturities ranging from two to three years and
15-Years U.S. agency MBS.
Taking into consideration the above-mentioned facts for modeling purposes, the net interest
income for the next twelve months under a growing balance sheet scenario, is estimated to slightly
increase by $1.4 million in a gradual parallel upward move of 200 basis points. Assuming parallel
shifts in interest rates, the Corporations net interest income would decrease in rising rates
scenarios over a five-year modeling horizon.
In order to comply with First BanCorps risk management policies, we continue modeling the
downward parallel rates moves by anchoring the short end of the curve,
99
(falling rates with a
flattening curve), even though, given the current level of rates as of September 30, 2009, some
market interest rates were projected to be zero. Under this scenario, where a considerable spread
compression is projected, net interest income for the next twelve months in a growing balance sheet
scenario is estimated to decrease by $32.1 million.
The Corporation used the gap analysis tool to evaluate the potential effect of rate shocks on
income over the selected time-periods. The gap report as of September 30, 2009 showed a negative
cumulative gap for 3 month of $151.3 million and a negative cumulative gap of $683.4 million for 1
year, compared to positive cumulative gaps of $2.1 billion and $1.4 billion for 3 months and 1
year, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. Gap management is a dynamic process, through which the
Corporation makes active adjustments to maintain sound and prudent interest rate risk exposures
Derivatives
First BanCorp uses derivative instruments and other strategies to manage its exposure to
interest rate risk caused by changes in interest rates beyond managements control.
The following summarizes major strategies, including derivative activities, used by the
Corporation in managing interest rate risk:
Interest rate cap agreements Interest rate cap agreements provide the right to receive
cash if a reference interest rate rises above a contractual rate. The value increases as the
reference interest rate rises. The Corporation enters into interest rate cap agreements for
protection against rising interest rates. Specifically, the interest rate on certain private
label mortgage pass-through securities and certain of the Corporations commercial loans to other
financial institutions is generally a variable rate limited to the weighted-average coupon of the
pass-through certificate or referenced residential mortgage collateral, less a contractual
servicing fee.
Interest rate swaps Interest rate swap agreements generally involve the exchange of
fixed and floating-rate interest payment obligations without the exchange of the underlying
notional principal amount. As of September 30, 2009, most of the interest rate swaps outstanding
are used for protection against rising interest rates. In the past, interest rate swaps volume
was much higher since they were used to convert fixed-rate brokered CDs (liabilities), mainly
those with long-term maturities, to a variable rate
and mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate loans. However, most of these
interest rate swaps were called during 2009, in the face of lower interest rate levels, and as a
consequence the Corporation exercised its call option on the swapped-to-floating brokered CDs.
Structured repurchase agreements The Corporation uses structured repurchase
agreements, with embedded call options, to reduce the Corporations exposure to interest rate
risk by lengthening the contractual maturities of its liabilities, while keeping funding costs
low. Another type of structured repurchase agreement includes repurchased agreements with
embedded cap corridors; these instruments also provide protection for a rising rate scenario.
100
For detailed information regarding the volume of derivative activities (e.g. notional amounts),
location and fair values of derivative instruments in the Statement of Financial Condition and the
amount of gains and losses reported in the Statement of (Loss) Income, refer to Note 8 in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements.
The following tables summarize the fair value changes in the Corporations derivatives as well as
the sources of the fair values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine-month period ended |
|
(In thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
(495 |
) |
Fair value of new contracts at inception |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Contracts terminated or called during the period |
|
|
(5,198 |
) |
Changes in fair value during the period |
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
(3,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Source of Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
In Excess |
|
|
Total |
|
(In thousands) |
|
One Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
of 5 Years |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing from observable market inputs |
|
$ |
(825 |
) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(712 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,249 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,736 |
) |
Pricing that consider unobservable market inputs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(825 |
) |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(712 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,782 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments, such as interest rate swaps, are subject to market risk. As is the
case with investment securities, the market value of derivative instruments is largely a function
of the financial markets expectations regarding the future direction of interest rates.
Accordingly, current market values are not necessarily indicative of the future impact of
derivative instruments on earnings. This will depend, for the most part, on the shape of the yield
curve as well as the level of interest rates.
As of September 30, 2009, all of the derivative instruments held by the Corporation were
considered economic undesignated hedges.
During the first half of 2009, all of the $1.1 billion of interest rate swaps that
economically hedge brokered CDs were called by the counterparties, mainly due to lower levels of
3-month LIBOR. Following the cancellation of the interest rate swaps, the Corporation exercised its
call option on the approximately $1.1 billion swapped-to- floating brokered CDs. The Corporation
recorded a net loss of $3.5 million as a result of these transactions resulting from the reversal
of the cumulative mark-to-market valuation of the swaps and the brokered CDs called.
The use of derivatives involves market and credit risk. The market risk of derivatives stems
principally from the potential for changes in the value of derivative contracts based on changes in
interest rates. The credit risk of derivatives arises from the potential of default from the
counterparty. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit
standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains
collateral. Master netting agreements incorporate rights of set-off that provide for the net
settlement of contracts with the same counterparty in the event of
default. Currently, the
Corporation is mostly engaged in
101
derivative instruments with counterparties with a credit rating of
single A or better. All of the Corporations interest rate swaps are supported by securities
collateral agreements, which allow the delivery of securities to and from the counterparties
depending on the fair value of the instruments, to minimize credit risk.
Set forth below is a detailed analysis of the Corporations credit exposure by counterparty
with respect to derivative instruments outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at |
|
|
Negative |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Interest Receivable |
|
Counterparty |
|
Rating(1) |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value(2) |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
(Payable) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP Morgan |
|
A+ |
|
$ |
67,726 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
(4,982 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,461 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
A+ |
|
|
49,446 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs |
|
A |
|
|
6,515 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley |
|
A |
|
|
109,928 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233,615 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
(6,143 |
) |
|
|
(4,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives (3) |
|
|
|
|
290,076 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
(1,192 |
) |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
523,691 |
|
|
$ |
4,066 |
|
|
$ |
(7,335 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,269 |
) |
|
$ |
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the S&P and Fitch Long Term Issuer Credit Ratings. |
|
(2) |
|
For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with positive fair value
excluding the related accrued interest receivable / payable. |
|
(3) |
|
Credit exposure with several Puerto Rico counterparties for wich a credit rating in
not readily available. Approximately $2.5 million of the credit exposure with local
companies relates to caps referenced to mortgages bought from R&G Premier Bank. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure at |
|
|
Negative |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Interest Receivable |
|
Counterparty |
|
Rating(1) |
|
Notional |
|
|
Fair Value(2) |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
Fair Values |
|
|
(Payable) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps with rated counterparties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovia |
|
AA- |
|
$ |
16,570 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
Merrill Lynch |
|
A |
|
|
230,190 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
UBS Financial Services, Inc. |
|
A+ |
|
|
14,384 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
JP Morgan |
|
A+ |
|
|
531,886 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
|
(5,726 |
) |
|
|
(3,407 |
) |
|
|
1,094 |
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
|
A+ |
|
|
151,884 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
(1,461 |
) |
|
|
(1,283 |
) |
|
|
512 |
|
Citigroup |
|
A+ |
|
|
295,130 |
|
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
2,299 |
|
Goldman Sachs |
|
A |
|
|
16,165 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Mortgan Stanley |
|
A |
|
|
107,450 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,363,659 |
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
|
(7,188 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
4,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other derivatives (3) |
|
|
|
|
332,634 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
(1,317 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,696,293 |
|
|
$ |
8,010 |
|
|
$ |
(8,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(495 |
) |
|
$ |
4,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the S&P and Fitch Long Term Issuer Credit Ratings. |
|
(2) |
|
For each counterparty, this amount includes derivatives with positive fair value
excluding the related accrued interest receivable / payable. |
|
(3) |
|
Credit exposure with several Puerto Rico counterparties for wich a credit rating in
not readily available. Approximately $0.8 million of the credit exposure with local
companies relates to caps referenced to mortgages bought from R&G Premier Bank. |
A Hull-White Interest Rate Tree approach is used to value the option components of
derivative instruments. The discounting of the cash flows is performed using US dollar LIBOR-based
discount rates or yield curves that account for the industry sector and the credit rating of the
counterparty and/or the Corporation. Although most of the derivative instruments are fully
collateralized, a credit spread is considered for those that are not secured in full. The
cumulative mark-to-market effect of credit risk in the valuation of derivative instruments resulted
in an unrealized gain of approximately $0.7 million as of
102
September 30, 2009, of which an
unrealized loss of $1.4 million was recorded in the nine months of 2009 and an immaterial
unrealized gain of $13,000 was recorded in the first nine months of 2008. The Corporation compares
the valuations obtained with valuations received from counterparties, as an internal control
procedure
Credit Risk Management
First BanCorp is subject to credit risk mainly with respect to its portfolio of loans
receivable and off-balance sheet instruments, mainly derivatives and loan commitments. Loans
receivable represents loans that First BanCorp holds for investment and, therefore, First BanCorp
is at risk for the term of the loan. Loan commitments represent commitments to extend credit,
subject to specific conditions, for specific amounts and maturities. These commitments may expose
the Corporation to credit risk and are subject to the same review and approval process as for
loans. Refer to Contractual Obligations and Commitments above for further details. The credit
risk of derivatives arises from the potential of the counterpartys default on its contractual
obligations. To manage this credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit
standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains
collateral. For further details and information on the Corporations derivative credit risk
exposure, refer to the Interest Rate Risk Management section above. The Corporation manages
its credit risk through credit policy, underwriting, and quality control procedures and an
established delinquency committee. The Corporation also employs proactive collection and loss
mitigation efforts. Furthermore, there are Loan Workout functions responsible for avoiding defaults
and minimizing losses upon default of commercial and
construction loans. The group utilizes relationship officers, collection specialists and
attorneys. In the case of residential construction projects, the workout function monitors project
specifics, such as project management and marketing, as deemed necessary.
The Corporation may also have risk of default in the securities portfolio. The securities held
by the Corporation are principally fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities and U.S. Treasury and
agency securities. Thus, a substantial portion of these instruments is backed by mortgages, a
guarantee of a U.S. government-sponsored entity or backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
government and is deemed to be of the highest credit quality.
Management, comprised of the Corporations Chief Credit Risk Officer, Chief Lending Officer,
and other senior executives, has the primary responsibility for setting strategies to achieve the
Corporations credit risk goals and objectives. These goals and objectives are documented in the
Corporations Credit Policy.
103
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and Non-performing Assets
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is charged to earnings to maintain the allowance for
loan and lease losses at a level that the Corporation considers adequate to provide for estimated
credit losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the
remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. The Corporations management evaluates the adequacy of
the allowance for loan losses considering factors affecting the Puerto Rico, Florida (USA), US
Virgin Islands or British Virgin Islands economies, and the resulting impact of the current
conditions of these economies on the Corporations loan portfolio, historical loan and lease losses
experience, the results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans, regulatory requirements and
loan impairment measurement. The Corporation takes into consideration information about trends on
non-accrual loans, delinquencies, changes in underwriting policies, and other risk characteristics
relevant to the particular loan category, among other factors. Although management believes that
the allowance for loan and lease losses is adequate, factors beyond the Corporations control,
including factors affecting the economies of Puerto Rico, the United States, the U.S.VI or British
VI may contribute to delinquencies and defaults, thus necessitating additional reserves.
The allowance for loan and lease losses is established based on managements evaluation of the
probable inherent losses in the portfolio. The allowance for loan and lease losses is comprised of
both specific valuation allowances and general valuation allowances.
The Corporation measures impairment individually for those commercial and construction loans
with a principal balance of $1 million or more. A loan is impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts
due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A specific reserve is determined for
those loans classified as impaired, primarily based on each such loans collateral value (if the
impaired loan is determined to be collateral dependent) or the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate. When foreclosure is probable, the
creditor is required to measure the impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. The fair
value of the collateral is generally obtained from appraisals. Updated appraisals are obtained when
the Corporation determines that loans are impaired and are updated
periodically thereafter. In addition, appraisals are
also obtained for certain residential mortgage loans and real estate loans on a spot basis based on
specific characteristics such as delinquency levels, age of the appraisal, and loan-to-value
ratios. Deficiencies from the excess of the recorded investment in collateral dependent loans over
the resulting fair value of the collateral are generally charged-off.
For loans individually reviewed and not determined to be impaired and for small, homogeneous
loans, including auto loans, consumer loans, finance lease loans, residential mortgage, commercial
and construction loans in amounts under $1.0 million, the Corporation maintains general valuation
allowances. The general reserve for consumer loans is based on factors such as delinquency trends,
credit bureau score bands, portfolio type,
104
geographical location, bankruptcy trends, recent market transactions, and other environmental
factors such as economic forecasts. The evaluation of residential mortgages is performed at the
individual loan level and then aggregated to determine the expected loss ratio. The model is based
on risk-adjusted prepayment curves, default curves, and severity curves. The severity is affected
by the expected house price scenario based on the most recent house price historical trends.
Default curves are used in the model to determine expected delinquency levels. The risk-adjusted
timing of liquidation and associated costs are used in the model and are risk-adjusted for the area
in which the property is located (Puerto Rico, Florida, or Virgin Islands). For commercial loans,
including construction loans, the general reserve is based on historical loss ratios, loan type,
risk-rating, geographical location, changes in collateral values for collateral dependent loans and
Gross Product (GP) or unemployment data for the geographical region. The methodology of accounting
for all probable losses in loans not individually measured for impairment purposes is made in
accordance with authoritative accounting guidance that requires losses be accrued when they are
probable of occurring and estimable.
Substantially all of the Corporations loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the
U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands or the U.S.
mainland (mainly in the state of Florida), the performance of the Corporations loan portfolio and
the value of the collateral supporting the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and
conditions within each specific area real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the
real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that the real estate market is experiencing
readjustments in value driven by the deteriorated purchasing power of consumers and general
economic conditions. The Corporation sets adequate loan-to-value ratios upon original approval
following the regulatory and credit policy standards. The real estate market for the U.S. Virgin
Islands remains fairly stable. In the Florida market, residential real estate has experienced a
very slow turnaround.
105
The following tables set forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for loan and lease
losses during the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, beginning of period |
|
$ |
407,746 |
|
|
$ |
222,272 |
|
|
$ |
281,526 |
|
|
$ |
190,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan and lease losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
6,896 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
36,804 |
|
|
|
8,801 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
19,432 |
|
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
48,995 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
44,609 |
|
|
|
3,239 |
|
|
|
118,154 |
|
|
|
33,426 |
|
Construction |
|
|
56,883 |
|
|
|
26,869 |
|
|
|
200,050 |
|
|
|
41,192 |
|
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
20,270 |
|
|
|
20,108 |
|
|
|
38,668 |
|
|
|
57,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for loan and lease losses |
|
|
148,090 |
|
|
|
55,319 |
|
|
|
442,671 |
|
|
|
142,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
(10,955 |
) |
|
|
(1,649 |
) |
|
|
(21,446 |
) |
|
|
(4,017 |
) |
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
(5,263 |
) |
|
|
(1,714 |
) |
|
|
(19,983 |
) |
|
|
(1,898 |
) |
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
(6,491 |
) |
|
|
(4,675 |
) |
|
|
(27,876 |
) |
|
|
(20,259 |
) |
Construction |
|
|
(47,374 |
) |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(138,755 |
) |
|
|
(7,487 |
) |
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
(16,918 |
) |
|
|
(18,355 |
) |
|
|
(52,776 |
) |
|
|
(52,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,001 |
) |
|
|
(27,569 |
) |
|
|
(260,836 |
) |
|
|
(86,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
1,107 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
Construction |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
6,882 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,649 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
|
|
8,123 |
|
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(84,352 |
) |
|
|
(25,152 |
) |
|
|
(252,713 |
) |
|
|
(80,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other adjustments (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses, end of period |
|
$ |
471,484 |
|
|
$ |
261,170 |
|
|
$ |
471,484 |
|
|
$ |
261,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to period end total
loans receivable |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
2.06 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
2.06 |
% |
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans
outstanding during the period |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
Provision for loan and lease losses to net charge-offs during the period |
|
|
1.76x |
|
|
|
2.20x |
|
|
|
1.75x |
|
|
|
1.78x |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Carryover of the allowance for loan losses related to the $218 million auto
loan portfolio acquired from Chrysler. |
The following table set forth information concerning the allocation of the allowance for loan
and lease losses by loan category and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans as of
the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans |
|
$ |
30,446 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
15,016 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Commercial mortgage loans |
|
|
46,790 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
17,775 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Construction loans |
|
|
144,838 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
83,482 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Commercial and Industrial loans (including
loans to local financial institutions) |
|
|
165,740 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
74,358 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Consumer loans and finance leases |
|
|
83,670 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
90,895 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
471,484 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
281,526 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of the Corporations
allowance for loan and lease losses as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 by loan category
and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually or through a
general valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comercial |
|
Residential |
|
Consumer and |
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
C&I |
|
Mortgage |
|
Mortgage |
|
Finance |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Loans |
|
Leases |
|
Total |
|
Impaired loans without
specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans,
net of charge-offs |
|
$ |
160,163 |
|
|
$ |
51,087 |
|
|
$ |
64,102 |
|
|
$ |
330,917 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
606,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with
specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans,
net of charge-offs |
|
|
501,268 |
|
|
|
231,739 |
|
|
|
123,034 |
|
|
|
63,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919,312 |
|
Allowance for loan and
lease losses |
|
|
65,876 |
|
|
|
60,663 |
|
|
|
20,929 |
|
|
|
2,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,956 |
|
Allowance for loan and
lease losses to
principal balance |
|
|
13.14 |
% |
|
|
26.18 |
% |
|
|
17.01 |
% |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
16.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with general allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
|
909,020 |
|
|
|
4,784,746 |
|
|
|
1,355,798 |
|
|
|
3,199,965 |
|
|
|
1,955,161 |
|
|
|
12,204,690 |
|
Allowance for loan and
lease losses |
|
|
78,962 |
|
|
|
105,077 |
|
|
|
25,861 |
|
|
|
27,958 |
|
|
|
83,670 |
|
|
|
321,528 |
|
Allowance for loan and
lease losses to
principal balance |
|
|
8.69 |
% |
|
|
2.20 |
% |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio, excluding
loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
$ |
1,570,451 |
|
|
$ |
5,067,572 |
|
|
$ |
1,542,934 |
|
|
$ |
3,594,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,955,161 |
|
|
$ |
13,730,271 |
|
Allowance for loan and
lease losses |
|
|
144,838 |
|
|
|
165,740 |
|
|
|
46,790 |
|
|
|
30,446 |
|
|
|
83,670 |
|
|
|
471,484 |
|
Allowance for loan and
lease losses to
principal balance |
|
|
9.22 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comercial |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Consumer and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
C&I |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Leases |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Impaired loans without specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
$ |
22,809 |
|
|
$ |
55,238 |
|
|
$ |
18,359 |
|
|
$ |
19,909 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
116,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans, net of charge-offs |
|
|
257,831 |
|
|
|
79,760 |
|
|
|
47,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,914 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
56,330 |
|
|
|
18,343 |
|
|
|
8,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,353 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to
principal balance |
|
|
21.85 |
% |
|
|
23.00 |
% |
|
|
18.34 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
21.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with general allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
|
1,246,355 |
|
|
|
4,290,450 |
|
|
|
1,470,076 |
|
|
|
3,461,416 |
|
|
|
2,108,363 |
|
|
|
12,576,660 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
27,152 |
|
|
|
56,015 |
|
|
|
9,095 |
|
|
|
15,016 |
|
|
|
90,895 |
|
|
|
198,173 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to
principal balance |
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
4.31 |
% |
|
|
1.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio, excluding loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance of loans |
|
$ |
1,526,995 |
|
|
$ |
4,425,448 |
|
|
$ |
1,535,758 |
|
|
$ |
3,481,325 |
|
|
$ |
2,108,363 |
|
|
$ |
13,077,889 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
|
83,482 |
|
|
|
74,358 |
|
|
|
17,775 |
|
|
|
15,016 |
|
|
|
90,895 |
|
|
|
281,526 |
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses to
principal balance |
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
1.68 |
% |
|
|
1.16 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
4.31 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
Credit quality has continued to be under pressure throughout 2009. The Corporation has
consistently added reserves across the entire loan portfolio during the weak economic environment.
Higher delinquencies, declines in real estate values, recent trends in charge-offs and sustained
weak economic conditions have caused increases in reserve factors for classified and unclassified
loans under regulatory guidance.
The provision for loan and lease losses amounted to $148.1 million, or 176% of net
charge-offs, for the third quarter of 2009, an increase of $92.8 million compared to the $55.3
million provision, or 220% of net charge-offs, recorded for the third quarter of 2008. For the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the provision for loan and lease losses amounted to
$442.7 million compared to $142.4 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in the
provision for loan and lease losses is mainly attributable to the following: i) the migration of a
substantial portion of loans to higher regulatory risk categories, such as substandard and special
mention, thus requiring higher general or specific reserves (if also considered impaired); ii)
changes in reserve factors used to determine the general reserve for the Corporations
construction, commercial and
107
residential mortgage loan portfolios; and iii) specific reserves for
some of these loans classified as impaired during 2009. The overall growth of the loan portfolio
also contributed to a higher provision for loan and lease losses during 2009.
Even though the deterioration in credit quality was observed in all of the Corporations
portfolios, it was more significant in the construction and commercial loan portfolios, which
were affected by the stagnant housing market and further deterioration in the economies of the
markets served. The provision for loan losses for the construction and commercial portfolios
increased $158.9 million and $132.4 million (an increase of $84.7 million in C&I loans and $47.7
million in commercial mortgage loans), respectively, for the nine-month period ended September
30, 2009 as compared to the comparable period in 2008. As mentioned above, the increase was mainly
driven by the migration of a substantial portion of construction and commercial loans to higher
regulatory risk categories which resulted in increases to the calculated reserve, increases in
specific reserves for construction and commercial loans considered impaired, and increases to
general reserve factors for these portfolios mainly to account for increases in the charge-offs and
delinquency levels of these portfolios (refer to methodology explanations above). The provision for
residential mortgages also increased significantly for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2009 as compared to the same period in 2008, an increase of $28 million, mainly as a result of
increases to general reserve factors based on updated analyses and as a result of a higher
portfolio of delinquent loans evaluated for impairment purposes that was negatively impacted by
decreases in collateral values.
In terms of geography, approximately $92.9 million, $22.8 million, and $114.1 million of the
total provision for loan and lease losses recorded for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2009 is related to construction loans, commercial mortgage loans, and C&I loans in Puerto Rico,
respectively, while $32.8 million pertains to the consumer and finance leases portfolio in Puerto
Rico, and $24.3 million to the residential mortgage portfolio for a total provision of $286.9
million recorded for the Puerto Rico portfolio. The continued trend of rising unemployment and the
depressed economy negatively impacted borrowers and is reflected in a persistent decline in the
volume of sales of new housing, underperformance of important sectors of the economy and continued
deterioration of loan credit quality.
With respect to the United States loan portfolio, the Corporation recorded a $133.1 million
provision for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, or $95.6 million higher than the
provision recorded in the same period of 2008. Most of the provision is related to construction
and commercial mortgage loans. The increase in the provision, compared to charges recorded in the
prior year period, is attributable to increases in specific reserves for loans individually
measured for impairment, including significant collateral dependent loans that were subsequently
charged-off to their collateral value during 2009. Impaired loans in the United States increased
from $210.1 million at December 31, 2008 to $540.4 million in September 30, 2009. As of September
30, 2009, approximately 88%, or $358.7 million of the total exposure to construction loans in
Florida was individually measured for impairment.
The provision for loan and lease losses for the Virgin Islands portfolio was $22.7 million for
the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009 compared to $10.8 million for the same period in
2008. The increase in the recorded provision for the nine-month
108
period ended September 30, 2009 is
mostly related to construction loans in the Virgin Islands which is $13.0 higher than for the same
period in 2008.
Net Charge-offs and Total Credit Losses
The Corporations net charge-offs for the third quarter and nine-month period ended September
30, 2009 were $84.4 million, or 2.53%, of average loans on an annualized basis and $252.7 million or
2.52% of average loans on an annualized basis, respectively, compared to $25.1 million or 0.80% of
average loans and $80.2 million or 0.88% of average loans, respectively, for the comparable periods
in 2008. The significant increase is due mainly to the accelerated deterioration in the collateral
values of construction loans, primarily in the Florida region. Floridas economy has been
hampered by a deteriorated housing market since the second half of 2007. The overbuilding in the
face of waning demand, among other things, caused a decline in the housing prices. The Corporation
had been obtaining appraisals and increasing its reserve, as necessary, with expectations for a
gradual housing market recovery. Nonetheless, the passage of time increased the possibility that
the recovery of the market will not be in the near term. For these reasons, the Corporation
decided to charge-off during 2009 collateral deficiencies for a significant amount of collateral
dependent loans based on current appraisals obtained. The deficiencies in the collateral raised
doubts about the potential to collect the principal. The Corporation is engaged in continuous
efforts to identify alternatives that enable borrowers to repay their loans and protect the
Corporations investment.
The
increase of $46.3 million in net charge-offs for construction
loans to $47.3 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared to $1.0 million for the same quarter in the previous
year, was related to the Corporations Florida and Puerto Rico operations. The
net charge-offs for construction loans recorded for the Puerto Rico operations amounted to $17.9 million for the quarter
and $44.3 million for the nine-months ended September 30, 2009, while for the United States
operations these amounts were $29.4 million and $94.4 million, respectively. Condo-conversion and
residential development projects in Florida continued to represent a significant portion of the
losses for the third quarter of 2009 and accounted for the majority of the significant construction
loan charge-offs recorded for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009. During the third
quarter of 2009 there were $19.0 million, $5.3 million and $5.1 million in net charge-offs related to condo-conversion, residential and commercial construction
projects in Florida, respectively. Also, net charge-offs of $17.9 million were recorded in
connection with the construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico, mainly residential housing
projects, including charge-offs of $14.0 million on two relationships. These relationships were
previously identified problem credits with prior appropriate reserves established based on
impairment analyses.
Commercial mortgage loans net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009 were $5.3 million, or
an annualized 1.35%, an increase of $3.6 million as compared to $1.7 million or an annualized 0.50%
for the third quarter of 2008. Commercial mortgage loans net charge-offs for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2009, were $19.9 million, an increase of $18.1 million as compared to
$1.9 million for same period of 2008. The charge-offs were
spread through several loans, distributed
across our geographic markets.
109
Total C&I net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009 were $5.6 million, or an annualized
0.49%, compared to $4.6 million, or an annualized 0.45% in the third quarter of 2008. C&I net
charge-offs for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, were $26.8 million, an increase of
$7.3 million as compared to $19.4 million for same period of 2008. C&I net charge-offs in the third
quarter of 2009 were impacted by a charge-off of $4.7 million on a single relationship in Puerto
Rico. The C&I net charge-offs for the nine-month period of 2009 are related to loans
to borrowers in several industries in Puerto Rico.
Residential mortgage net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009 were $10.9 million, or an
annualized 1.21% of related average loans. This was up by $9.3 million, from $1.6 million, or an
annualized 0.19%, in the third quarter of 2008. Total residential net charge offs for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 were $21.4 million, an increase of $17.4 million
compared to $4.0 million for the same period in 2008. The higher loss levels for the third quarter
of 2009 were a result of $8.4 million in charge-offs (including $6.0 million in Florida) on
residential mortgage loan portfolios considered homogeneous and evaluated for impairment given high
delinquency and loan-to-value levels, which has been negatively impacted by decreases in collateral
values. Total residential mortgage loan portfolios evaluated for impairment purposes amounted to
$291.5 million as of September 30, 2009 and have been charged-off to their realizable value,
representing approximately 66% of the total non-performing residential mortgage loan portfolio
outstanding as of September 30, 2009. Historical and expected loss rates are considered when
establishing the levels of general reserves for the residential mortgage loan portfolio. The ratio
of net charge-offs to average loans on the
Corporations residential mortgage loan portfolio of 1.21% for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 is still lower than the approximately 2.3% average charge-off rate for commercial banks in the
U.S. mainland reported for the second quarter of 2009. The Puerto Rico housing market has not seen
the dramatic decline in housing prices that affected the U.S. mainland; however, there is currently
an oversupply of housing units compounded by a lower demand for housing due to diminished consumer
purchasing power and confidence. The variance in net charge-offs for the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 is influenced by the same factors that
caused the variance when comparing the third quarter of 2009 to the
same period in 2008. In
addition, a portion of the charge-offs for the residential mortgage
loan portfolio was related to a
higher volume of foreclosed properties acquired in satisfaction of loans during 2009 and subsequent
sales (within a 3-month period or less) at lower prices due to the Corporations intent not to
accumulate REO inventory.
Total consumer and finance leases net charge-offs in the third quarter of 2009 were $15.3
million, or an annualized 3.09%, compared to net charge-offs of $16.2 million, or annualized 2.98%,
for the third quarter of 2008. Net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009 were down on an
absolute basis from net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2008. However, as a result of a 9%
decline in average loans, annualized net charge-offs as a percent of related loans increased.
Consumer and finance leases charge-offs for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 were
$45.9 slightly below net charge-offs of $47.5 million for the same period in 2008.
110
The following table presents annualized charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter Ended |
|
For the Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1.21 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.81 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
11.80 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
11.61 |
% |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans and finance leases |
|
|
3.09 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
The above ratios are based on annualized charge-offs and are not necessarily indicative of the
results expected for the entire year or in subsequent periods.
The following table presents charge-offs (annualized) to average loans held-in-portfolio by
geographic segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
PUERTO RICO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
0.54 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
7.23 |
% |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
6.36 |
% |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
2.93 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
1.58 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIRGIN ISLANDS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial (1) |
|
|
-0.69 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
0.83 |
% |
|
|
9.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLORIDA OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
7.73 |
% |
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
27.23 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
26.05 |
% |
|
|
1.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and finance leases |
|
|
6.77 |
% |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
7.31 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
10.93 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
10.71 |
% |
|
|
0.85 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the third quarter of 2009, recoveries in commercial and industrial loans in the Virgin Islands exceeded charge-offs. |
111
Total credit losses (equal to net charge-offs plus losses on REO operations) for the third
quarter and nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 amounted to $89.4 million and $269.7
million, or 2.67% and 2.68% on an annualized basis to average loans and repossessed assets,
respectively, in contrast to credit losses of $30.8 million, or a loss rate of 0.98%, for the third
quarter of 2008 and $92.2 million, or a loss rate of 1.00% for the first nine months of 2008.
112
The following table presents a detail of the REO inventory and credit losses for the
periods indicated:
Credit Loss Performance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
Nine-Month Period Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO balances, carrying value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
33,831 |
|
|
$ |
17,361 |
|
|
$ |
33,831 |
|
|
$ |
17,361 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
17,093 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
17,093 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
Condo-conversion projects |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
18,591 |
|
Construction |
|
|
8,569 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
8,569 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
67,493 |
|
|
$ |
40,422 |
|
|
$ |
67,493 |
|
|
$ |
40,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO activity (number of properties): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning property inventory, |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Properties acquired |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Properties disposed |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending property inventory |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average holding period (in days) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Condo-conversion projects |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Construction |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO operations (loss) gain: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market adjustments and (losses) gain on sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
(2,777 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,261 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,106 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(1,168 |
) |
Condo-conversion projects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,522 |
) |
|
|
(3,062 |
) |
|
|
(11,539 |
) |
|
|
(4,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other REO operations expenses |
|
|
(1,493 |
) |
|
|
(2,564 |
) |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
|
(7,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss on REO operations |
|
$ |
(5,015 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,626 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,016 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHARGE-OFFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential charge-offs, net |
|
|
(10,882 |
) |
|
|
(1,649 |
) |
|
|
(21,373 |
) |
|
|
(4,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial charge-offs, net |
|
|
(10,878 |
) |
|
|
(6,294 |
) |
|
|
(46,752 |
) |
|
|
(21,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction charge-offs, net |
|
|
(47,324 |
) |
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
(138,694 |
) |
|
|
(7,333 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and finance leases charge-offs, net |
|
|
(15,268 |
) |
|
|
(16,187 |
) |
|
|
(45,894 |
) |
|
|
(47,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs, net |
|
|
(84,352 |
) |
|
|
(25,152 |
) |
|
|
(252,713 |
) |
|
|
(80,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSSES (1) |
|
$ |
(89,367 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,778 |
) |
|
$ |
(269,729 |
) |
|
$ |
(92,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS RATIO PER CATEGORY (2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
|
|
1.10 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
1.01 |
% |
|
|
0.56 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
11.84 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
11.75 |
% |
|
|
0.68 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
3.08 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CREDIT LOSS RATIO (3) |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
|
0.98 |
% |
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Equal to REO operations (losses) gains plus Charge-offs, net. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus market adjustments and gains (losses) on sale of REO divided
by average loans and repossessed assets. |
|
(3) |
|
Calculated as net charge-offs plus net loss on REO operations divided by average loans and
repossessed assets. |
113
Impaired Loans
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, impaired loans and their related allowance
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with valuation allowance, net of charge-offs |
|
$ |
919,312 |
|
|
$ |
384,914 |
|
Impaired loans without valuation allowance, net of charge-offs |
|
|
606,269 |
|
|
|
116,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,525,581 |
|
|
$ |
501,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans |
|
$ |
149,956 |
|
|
$ |
83,353 |
|
The loans that were classified as impaired during the first nine months of 2009 totaled
approximately $1.2 billion, which required a specific reserve of $114.0 million. Partially
offsetting the increase in impaired loans were charge-offs of approximately $68.8 million related
to the $1.2 billion loans classified as impaired during 2009 and charge-offs of approximately
$115.6 million associated with impaired loans identified prior to 2009. Other decreases include
collateral repossessions (mainly in Florida), loans paid in full, partial payments and loans sold.
Approximately
$93.5 million, or 51%, of the charge-offs of impaired loans recorded during
2009 are related to the construction loan portfolio in Florida and $44.2 million, or 24%, are
related to the construction loan portfolio in Puerto Rico.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the activity in the allowance for impaired loans
for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Comercial Mortgage |
|
|
Residential Mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Total |
|
(In thousands) |
Allowance for impaired loans, beginning of period |
|
$ |
56,330 |
|
|
$ |
18,343 |
|
|
$ |
8,680 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
83,353 |
|
Provision for impaired loans |
|
|
147,314 |
|
|
|
61,640 |
|
|
|
31,174 |
|
|
|
10,902 |
|
|
|
251,030 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(137,768 |
) |
|
|
(19,320 |
) |
|
|
(18,925 |
) |
|
|
(8,414 |
) |
|
|
(184,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans, end of period |
|
$ |
65,876 |
|
|
$ |
60,663 |
|
|
$ |
20,929 |
|
|
$ |
2,488 |
|
|
$ |
149,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the present economic outlook in the Corporations principal markets and in spite of
the actions taken, the Corporation may experience further deterioration in its portfolios, which
may result in higher credit losses and additions to reserve balances.
114
Non-accruing and Non-performing Assets
Total non-performing assets are the sum of non-accruing loans, foreclosed real estate and
other repossessed properties as well as non-performing investment securities. Non-accruing loans
are those loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued. When a loan is placed in
non-accruing status, any interest previously recognized and not collected is reversed and charged
against interest income.
Non-accruing Loans Policy
Residential Real Estate Loans The Corporation classifies real estate loans in non-accruing
status when interest and principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Commercial and Construction Loans The Corporation places commercial loans (including
commercial real estate and construction loans) in non-accruing status when interest and principal
have not been received for a period of 90 days or more or when there are doubts about the potential
to collect all of the principal based on collateral deficiencies or, in other situations, when
collection of all of principal or interest is not expected due to deterioration in the financial
condition of the borrower. Cash payments received on certain loans that are impaired and
collateral dependent are recognized when collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the
loans. The principal portion of the payment is used to reduce the principal balance of the loan,
whereas the interest portion is recognized on a cash basis (when collected). However, when
management believes that the ultimate collectability of principal is in doubt, the interest portion
is applied to principal. The risk exposure of this portfolio is diversified as to individual
borrowers and industries among other factors. In addition, a large portion is secured with real
estate collateral.
Finance Leases Finance leases are classified in non-accruing status when interest and
principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Consumer Loans Consumer loans are classified in non-accruing status when interest and
principal have not been received for a period of 90 days or more.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
OREO acquired in settlement of loans is carried at the lower of cost (carrying value of the
loan) or fair value less estimated costs to sell off the real estate at the date of acquisition
(estimated realizable value).
115
Other Repossessed Property
The other repossessed property category includes repossessed boats and autos acquired in
settlement of loans. Repossessed boats and autos are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated
fair value.
Investment Securities
This category presents investment securities reclassified to non-accruing status, at their
book value.
Past Due Loans
Past due loans are accruing loans which are contractually delinquent 90 days or more. Past due
loans are either current as to interest but delinquent in the payment of principal or are insured
or guaranteed under applicable FHA and VA programs.
During the third quarter of 2007, the Corporation started a loan loss mitigation program
providing homeownership preservation assistance. Loans modified through this program are reported
as non-performing loans and interest is recognized on a cash basis. When there is reasonable
assurance of repayment and the borrower has made payments over a sustained period, the loan is
returned to accruing status.
The following table presents non-performing assets as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Non-accruing loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
$ |
439,720 |
|
|
$ |
274,923 |
|
Commercial mortgage |
|
|
196,708 |
|
|
|
85,943 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
240,424 |
|
|
|
58,358 |
|
Construction |
|
|
609,865 |
|
|
|
116,290 |
|
Finance leases |
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
6,026 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
47,360 |
|
|
|
45,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,538,821 |
|
|
|
587,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REO |
|
|
67,493 |
|
|
|
37,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other repossessed property |
|
|
13,338 |
|
|
|
12,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities (1) |
|
|
64,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
1,684,195 |
|
|
$ |
637,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past due loans 90 days and still accruing |
|
$ |
243,894 |
|
|
$ |
471,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
8.39 |
% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans to total loans receivable |
|
|
11.21 |
% |
|
|
4.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
|
$ |
471,484 |
|
|
$ |
281,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans |
|
|
30.64 |
% |
|
|
47.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to total non-accruing loans,
excluding residential real estate loans |
|
|
42.90 |
% |
|
|
90.16 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Collateral pledged with Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. |
116
Total non-performing assets as of September 30, 2009 were $1.68 billion, compared to $637.2
million as of December 31, 2008. The increase in non-performing assets since December 31, 2008 was
led by an increase of $537.0 million in loans classified as non-performing in Puerto Rico,
including increases of $181.0 million in construction loans, $173.5 million in C&I loans, $120.9
million in residential mortgage loans and $60.5 million in commercial mortgage loans. In Florida,
non-performing loans increased by $401.4 million, including increases of $314.0 million in
construction loans, $45.3 million in residential mortgage loans and $40.3 million in commercial
mortgage loans. In the Virgin Islands, non-performing loans increased by $13.2 million, mainly
commercial mortgage loans.
Also, during 2009, the Corporation classified as non-performing investment securities with a
book value of $64.5 million that were pledged to Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc., in
connection with several interest rate swap agreements entered into with that institution.
Considering that the investment securities have not yet been recovered by the Corporation, despite
its efforts in this regard, the Corporation decided to classify such investments as non-performing.
Other increases in non-performing assets mainly consist of additions to the real estate owned
portfolio, which increased by $30.2 million.
Total non-performing assets in Puerto Rico amounted to $1.1 billion as of September 30, 2009,
compared to $512.6 million as of December 31, 2008. The increase is primarily related to the
increase of $181 million in non-performing construction loans, $173.5 million in C&I loans and
$120.9 million in residential mortgage loans. The increase in
construction non-performing loans,
which accounted for 34% of the increase in non-performing loans in Puerto Rico, was primarily
associated with residential housing units construction projects. There were seven construction
loans greater than $10 million in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2009, compared to two as
of December 31, 2008, including a $65 million relationship related to a high rise residential
project classified as non-accrual during the third quarter of 2009. The Corporation is evaluating
restructuring alternatives to mitigate losses and enable borrowers to repay their loans under
revised terms seeking to preserve the value of the Corporations interests over the long-term. The
increase in C&I non-performing loans reflects the continued stress in the Puerto Rico portfolio as
a result of further weakened economic conditions. There were four C&I loans greater than $10
million in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2009, compared to none as of December 31, 2008.
In the aggregate these four relationships accounted for $103 million or 60% of the increase in C&I
non-performing loans in Puerto Rico when compared to the balance at December 31, 2008. Since
December 31, 2008, non-performing residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico increased by $120.9
million, reflecting the weakened economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the continued trend of
higher unemployment rates affecting consumers. Additionally, $33.8 million of the increase in
non-performing residential mortgage loans relates to loans acquired in the previously explained
transaction with R&G.
The main reason for the increase in non-performing assets of the Florida operations was the
construction loan portfolio. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporation classified approximately
$355.0 million, net of charge-offs, as non-performing construction loans in the state of Florida,
an increase of $313.9 million compared to $41.1 million as of December 31, 2008. There were twelve
construction loans, in the state of Florida, greater than $10
117
million in non-accrual status as of September 30, 2009, compared to one as of December 31,
2008. Collateral deficiencies on these loans may raise doubts about the ultimate ability to
collect on the principal in the current economic environment, however, at the close of the third
quarter of 2009, approximately $186 million of the loans comprising the increase in non-performing
construction loans in Florida were current or had delinquencies of less than 90 days in their
interest payments and collections are recorded on a cash basis going forward. As
sales continue to lag, some borrowers reverted to rental projects. In
some cases, cash
collections cover interest plus property taxes, insurance and other operating costs associated with
the projects.
The consumer and finance leases non-performing loan portfolio remained relatively flat at
$52.1 million as of September 30, 2009 when compared to $51.7 million as of December 31, 2008. This
portfolio showed signs of stability and benefited from changes in underwriting standards
implemented in late 2005. The consumer loan portfolio with an average life of approximately four
years has been replenished by new originations under the revised standards.
The allowance to non-performing loans ratio as of September 30, 2009 was 30.64%, compared to
47.95% as of December 31, 2008. The decrease in the ratio is attributable in part to
non-performing collateral dependent loans that are evaluated individually for impairment that,
after charging-off $170.7 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 representing
the excess of the recorded investment in the loan over the fair value of the collateral, reflected
limited impairment or no impairment at all, and other impaired loans that did not require specific
reserves based on collateral values or cash flows projections
analyses performed. Also 17% of the increase in non-performing loans since December 31, 2008 is
related to residential mortgage loans, mainly in Puerto Rico, where the Corporations loan loss
experience has been comparatively low due to, among other things, the Corporations conservative
underwriting practices and loan-to-value ratios, thus requiring a lower general reserve as compared
to other portfolios. This increase includes $33.8 million of non-performing residential mortgage
loans attributable to the previously explained transaction with
R&G.
The Corporation provides homeownership preservation assistance to its customers through a loss
mitigation program in Puerto Rico and through programs sponsored by the Federal Government. Due to
the nature of the borrowers financial condition, the restructure or loan modification through
these program as well as other individual commercial, commercial mortgage loans, construction loans
and residential mortgages in the U.S. mainland fits the definition of Troubled Debt Restructuring
(TDR). A restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor for economic or legal reasons
related to the debtors financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. As of September 30, 2009, the Corporations TDR loans consisted of $89.8
million of residential mortgage loans, $34.0 million commercial and industrial loans, $58.3 million
commercial mortgage loans and $139.1 million of construction loans. From the $321.2 million total
TDR loans, approximately $50.5 million are in compliance with modified terms, $1.8 million
are 30-89 days delinquent and $268.9 million
are classified as non-accrual as of September 30, 2009.
In view of current conditions in the United States mainland housing market and weakening
economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the Corporation may experience further
118
deterioration in its portfolio, in particular the commercial, construction and residential loan
portfolios.
Operational Risk
The Corporation faces ongoing and emerging risk and regulatory pressure related to the
activities that surround the delivery of banking and financial products. Coupled with external
influences such as market conditions, security risks, and legal risk, the potential for operational
and reputational loss has increased. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, the
Corporation has developed, and continues to enhance, specific internal controls, policies and
procedures that are designated to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels
throughout the organization. The purpose of these mechanisms is to provide reasonable assurance
that the Corporations business operations are functioning within the policies and limits
established by management.
The Corporation classifies operational risk into two major categories: business specific and
corporate-wide affecting all business lines. For business specific risks, a risk assessment group
works with the various business units to ensure consistency in policies, processes and assessments.
With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business recovery, legal and
compliance, the Corporation has specialized groups, such as the Legal Department, Information
Security, Corporate Compliance, Information Technology and Operations. These groups assist the
lines of business in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to
the needs of the business groups.
119
Legal and Compliance Risk
Legal and compliance risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and
regulatory requirements, the risk of adverse legal judgments against the Corporation, and the risk
that a counterpartys performance obligations will be unenforceable. The Corporation is subject to
extensive regulation in the different jurisdictions in which it
conducts its business, and this
regulatory scrutiny has been significantly increasing over the last several years. The Corporation
has established and continues to enhance procedures based on legal and regulatory requirements that
are reasonably designed to ensure compliance with all applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements. The Corporation has a Compliance Director who reports to the Chief Risk Officer and
is responsible for the oversight of regulatory compliance and implementation of an enterprise-wide
compliance risk assessment process. The Compliance division has officer roles in each major
business areas with direct reporting relationships to the Corporate Compliance Group.
120
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding market risk to which the Corporation is exposed, see the information
contained under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations Risk Management.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Control and Procedures
First BanCorps management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of First BanCorps disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
as of September 30, 2009. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes to the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as
such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal
quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
121
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the opinion of the Companys management, the pending and threatened legal proceedings of
which management is aware will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the
Corporation.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
For a detailed discussion of certain risk factors that could affect First BanCorps
operations, financial condition or results for future periods see the risk factors below and Item
1A, Risk Factors, in First BanCorps 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These factors could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and
capital position, and could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or
the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Also refer to
the discussion in Part I Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in this report for additional information that may supplement or update
the discussion of risk factors in the Corporations 2008 Form 10-K.
The
risks described in the Corporations 2008 Form 10-K and in this report, including the risks discussed in this section, are not the only
risk facing the Corporation. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the
Corporation or currently deemed by the Corporation to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect
the Corporations business, financial condition or results of operations.
Credit quality, which is continuing to deteriorate, may result in future additional losses
The quality of First BanCorps credits has continued to be under pressure during 2009 as a result
of continued recessionary conditions in Puerto Rico and the state of Florida that have led to,
among other things, higher unemployment levels, much lower absorption rates for new residential
construction projects and further declines in property values.
Our business depends on the creditworthiness of our customers and counterparties and the value of
the assets securing our loans or underlying our investments. When the credit quality of the
customer base materially decreases or the risk profile of a market, industry or group of customers
changes materially, our business, financial condition, allowance levels, asset impairments,
liquidity, capital and results of operations is adversely affected.
While we have substantially increased our provision for loan and lease losses in 2009, there is no
certainty that it will be sufficient to cover future credit losses in the portfolio because of
continued adverse changes in the economy, market conditions or events negatively affecting specific
customers, industries or markets both in Puerto Rico and Florida. We periodically review the
allowance for loan and lease losses for adequacy considering economic conditions and trends,
collateral values and credit quality indicators, including charge-off experience and levels of past
due loans and non-performing assets.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company recognized OTTI on its private label MBS. Valuation and OTTI
determinations will continue to be affected by external market factors including default rates,
severity rates and macro-economic factors. First
122
BanCorps future results may be materially affected by worsening defaults and severity rates
related to the underlying collateral.
Unexpected losses in future reporting periods may require the Corporation to adjust further the valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets
The Corporation evaluates the deferred tax assets for recoverability based on all available
evidence. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject
to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between the future
projected operating performance and the actual results. The Corporation is required to establish a
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if the Corporation determines, based on available
evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In evaluating the more-likely-than-not
criterion, the Corporation considers all positive and negative evidence as of the end of each
reporting period. Future adjustments, either increases or decreases, to the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance will be determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net
deferred tax assets. The realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the
existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carryback or carryforward periods under the
tax law. As a result of the evaluation of the deferred tax asset
during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recorded a non-cash charge of $152.2 million to increase the valuation allowance.
Due to significant estimates utilized in establishing the valuation allowance and the
potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably possible that the Corporation
will be required to record further adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting periods.
Such a charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial
condition and capital position.
Increase in the FDIC deposit insurance premium may have a significant financial impact on the Corporation
The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions up to certain limits. The FDIC
charges insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund. Current
economic conditions have increased expectations for bank failures, in which case the FDIC would
take control of failed banks and ensure payment of deposit up to insured limits using the resources
of the Deposit Insurance Fund. In such case, the FDIC may increase premium assessments to maintain
adequate funding of the Deposit Insurance Fund.
The
Corporations funding is significantly dependent on the issuance of
brokered certificates of deposit
At September 30, 2009, the Corporation had $7.5 billion in brokered deposits, representing
approximately 61% of our total deposits. We rely, in large part, on brokered deposits as a source
of liquidity. The Corporation uses this liquidity to, among other things, pay operating expenses,
maintain our lending activities and replace certain maturing liabilities. Brokered deposits
represent a less stable source of funding than do local retail deposits. The availability of
additional brokered deposits depends on a variety of factors including market conditions,
regulatory matters and the Corporations overall financial condition.
Downgrades to the Corporations credit ratings could potentially increase the cost of funds
The Corporations credit as long-term issuer is currently rated B by Standard & Poors (S&P)
and B- by Fitch Ratings Limited (Fitch); both with negative outlook.
At the FirstBank Puerto Rico subsidiary level, long-term senior debt is currently rated B1 by
Moodys Investor Service (Moodys), four notches below their definition of investment grade; B by
S&P, and B by Fitch, both five notches below their definition of investment grade. The outlook on
the Banks credit ratings from the three rating agencies is negative.
The Corporation does not have any outstanding debt or derivative agreements that would be
affected by the recent credit downgrades. The Corporations liquidity is contingent upon its
ability to obtain external sources of funding to finance its operations. Any future downgrades in
credit ratings can hinder the Corporations access to external funding and/or cause external
funding to be more expensive, which could in turn adversely affect the results of operations. Also,
any change in credit ratings may affect the fair value of certain liabilities and unsecured
derivatives that consider the Corporations own credit risk as part of the valuation.
The debt and financial strengths ratings are current opinions of the rating agencies. As such,
they may be changed, supended or withdrawn at any time by the rating agencies as results of changes
in, or inability of, information or based on other circumstances.
There may be future dilution of our common stock
In January 2009, in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program, established as part of
the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the Corporation issued to
123
the U.S. Treasury 400,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,
Series F, $1,000 liquidation preference value per share. In connection with this investment, the
Corporation also issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase 5,842,259 shares of the
Corporations common stock (the Warrant) at an exercise price of $10.27 per share. The Warrant
has a 10-year term and is exercisable at any time.
The exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrant are subject
to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
The possible future issuance of equity securities through the exercise of the Warrant could
affect the Corporations current stockholders in a number of ways, including by:
|
|
|
diluting the voting power of the current holders of common stock (the shares underlying
the Warrant represent approximately 6% of the Corporations outstanding shares of common
stock as of September 30, 2009); |
|
|
|
|
diluting the earnings per share and book value per share of the outstanding shares of
common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
making the payment of dividends on common stock more expensive. |
Also, recent increases in the allowance for loan and lease losses resulted in a reduction in
the amount of our tangible common equity. Given the focus on tangible common equity by regulatory
authorities and rating agencies, we may be required to raise additional capital through the
issuance of additional common stock in future periods to increase
that common equity. However, no assurance can be given that we will
be able to raise additional capital. An increase
in our capital through an issuance of Common Stock could have a dilutive effect on the existing
holders of our Common Stock and may adversely affect its market price.
Legislative and regulatory actions taken now or in the future as a result of the current crisis in
the financial industry may impact our business, governance structure, financial condition or
results of operations
Current economic conditions, particularly in the financial markets, have resulted in government
regulatory agencies and political bodies placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial
services industry. The U.S. Government has intervened on an unprecedented scale, responding to what
has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, by enhancing the liquidity support available
to financial institutions, establishing a commercial paper funding facility, temporarily
guaranteeing money market funds and certain types of debt issuances, and increasing insurance on
bank deposits.
These programs have subjected participating financial institutions to additional restrictions,
oversight and costs. In addition, new proposals for legislation continue to be introduced in the
U.S. Congress that could further substantially increase regulation of the financial services
industry and impose restrictions on the operations and general ability of firms within the industry
to conduct business consistent with historical practices, including in the areas of compensation,
interest rates, financial product offerings and disclosures, and the impact of bankruptcy
proceedings on consumer residential real estate mortgages, among others. Federal and state
regulatory agencies also frequently adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in
which existing regulations are applied.
124
On June 17, 2009, the U.S. Treasury Department released a white paper entitled Financial
Regulatory Reform A New Foundation: Rebuilding Financial Regulation and Supervision, which
outlined the Obama administrations plan to make extensive and wide ranging reforms to the U.S.
financial regulatory system. The plan contains proposals to, among other things; (i) create a new
financial regulatory agency called the Consumer
Financial Protection Agency, (ii) eliminate the federal thrift charter and create a new national
bank supervisor, (iii) dispose of the interstate branching framework of the Riegle-Neal Act by
giving national and state-chartered banks the unrestricted ability to branch across state lines,
(iv) establish strengthened capital and prudential standards for banks and bank holding companies,
(v) increase supervision and regulation of large financial firms, and (vi) create an Office of
National Insurance within the U.S. Treasury Department. We cannot
anticipate the substance or impact
of pending or future legislation, regulation or the application thereof. Compliance with such
current and potential regulation and scrutiny may significantly increase our costs, impede the
efficiency of our internal business practices, require us to increase our regulatory capital and
limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner.
We also face increased regulation and regulatory scrutiny as a result of our
participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. In January 2009, we issued preferred stock and
warrants to purchase our common stock to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program.
Pursuant to the terms of this issuance, we are prohibited from increasing the dividend rate on our
common stock in an amount exceeding the last quarterly cash dividend paid per share, or the amount
publicly announced (if lower), of common stock prior to October 14, 2008, which was $0.07 per share
without approval. Furthermore, as long as the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is
outstanding, dividend payments and repurchases or redemptions relating to certain equity
securities, including our common stock, are prohibited unless all accrued and unpaid dividends are
paid on such preferred stock, subject to certain limited exceptions.
On January 21, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation amending the TARP
provisions of Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA) to include quarterly reporting
requirements with respect to lending activities, examinations by an institutions primary federal
regulator of the use of funds and compliance with program requirements, restrictions on
acquisitions by depository institutions receiving TARP funds, and
authorization for the U.S. Treasury
to have an observer at board meetings of recipient institutions, among other things. On February
17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009
(ARRA). ARRA contains expansive new restrictions on executive compensation for financial
institutions and other companies participating in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. ARRA amends
the executive compensation and corporate governance provisions of EESA. In doing so, it continues
all the same compensation and governance restrictions and adds substantially to restrictions in
several areas. In addition, on June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued regulations implementing
the compensation requirements under ARRA. The regulations became applicable to existing TARP
Capital Purchase Program recipients upon publication in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009.
In addition, Congress may adopt other legislation impacting financial institutions that obtain
funding under the TARP or changing lending practices that legislators believe led to the current
economic situation. The new legal requirements and the adoption of any
125
additional requirements could restrict or require changes to our lending, executive compensation or
governance practices, increase governmental oversight of our businesses and adversely affect our
ability to retain senior officers.
Our suspension of dividends could adversely affect our stock price and result in the expansion of
our Board
In March of 2009, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a supervisory
guidance letter intended to provide direction to bank holding companies (BHCs) on the declaration
and payment of dividends, capital redemptions, and capital repurchases by BHCs in the context of
their capital planning process. The letter reiterates the long standing Federal Reserve
supervisory policies and guidance to the effect that BHCs should only pay dividends from current
earnings. More specifically, the March 2009 letter heightens expectations that a BHC will inform
and consult with the Federal Reserve supervisory staff on the declaration and payment of dividends
that exceed earnings for the period for which the dividend is being paid. In consideration of the
financial results reported for the second quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporation decided, as
a matter of prudent fiscal management and following the Federal Reserve guidance, to suspend
payment of common stock dividends and dividends on all series of preferred stock. The Corporation
cannot anticipate if and when the payment of dividends might be reinstated.
This suspension could adversely affect the Corporations stock price. Further, if dividends on our
preferred stock series A to E and the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP
Capital Purchase Program are not paid for six quarterly dividend periods or more, the authorized
number of directors of the board will be increased by two and the preferred stockholders will have
the right to elect the two additional members of the board of directors until all accrued and
unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods have been declared and paid in full.
126
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
12.1 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preference Dividends
31.1 CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 CEO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
127
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Corporation has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
First BanCorp.
Registrant
|
|
Date: November 9, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Aurelio Alemán
|
|
|
|
Aurelio Alemán |
|
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Orlando Berges
|
|
|
|
Orlando Berges |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
128