e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Commission file number 0-52105
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
94-3030279
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
27422 PORTOLA PARKWAY, SUITE 200,
FOOTHILL RANCH, CALIFORNIA
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
92610-2831
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(949) 614-1740
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to
be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No o
As of April 21, 2011, there were 19,268,791 shares of the Common Stock of the registrant
outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In millions of dollars, except share and |
|
|
|
per share amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
|
$ |
135.6 |
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, less allowance for doubtful receivables of
$0.6 at March 31, 2011 and $0.6 at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
114.0 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
169.6 |
|
|
|
167.5 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
90.3 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
433.1 |
|
|
|
471.4 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment net |
|
|
358.1 |
|
|
|
354.1 |
|
Net asset in respect of VEBAs |
|
|
208.6 |
|
|
|
195.7 |
|
Deferred tax assets net |
|
|
221.0 |
|
|
|
231.1 |
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
74.0 |
|
|
|
83.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,370.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,342.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
63.7 |
|
|
$ |
50.8 |
|
Accrued salaries, wages, and related expenses |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
Payable to affiliate |
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Current portion of secured debt and credit facilities |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
164.4 |
|
|
|
142.3 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
130.1 |
|
|
|
134.7 |
|
Cash convertible senior notes |
|
|
143.0 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
Long-term secured debt and credit facilities |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
445.4 |
|
|
|
430.2 |
|
Commitments and contingencies Note 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01, 90,000,000 shares authorized at both March 31, 2011 and
at December 31, 2010; 19,268,791 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and
19,214,451 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
988.8 |
|
|
|
987.1 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
Common stock owned by Union VEBA subject to transfer restrictions, at reorganization
value, 3,306,938 shares at March 31, 2011 and 3,523,980 shares at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(79.4 |
) |
|
|
(84.6 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,724,606 shares at March 31, 2011 and 1,724,606 shares
at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(72.3 |
) |
|
|
(72.3 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
925.4 |
|
|
|
912.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,370.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,342.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
1
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In millions of dollars, except |
|
|
|
share and per share amounts) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
267.5 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of products sold, excluding
depreciation, amortization and
other items |
|
|
280.9 |
|
|
|
232.0 |
|
Restructuring costs and other benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Selling, administrative, research and development, and general |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
302.1 |
|
|
|
252.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Other (expense) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share, Basic Note 1, 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, Diluted Note 1, 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (000): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
18,950 |
|
|
|
20,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
18,950 |
|
|
|
20,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
2
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Union |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VEBA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Transfer |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Restriction |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
(In millions of dollars, except for shares) |
|
BALANCE, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
19,214,451 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
987.1 |
|
|
$ |
80.1 |
|
|
$ |
(84.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(72.3 |
) |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
912.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment,
net of tax of $0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Union VEBA shares by the Union
VEBA, net of tax of $4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of non-vested shares to employees |
|
|
63,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common shares to employees upon
vesting of restricted stock units and
performance shares |
|
|
13,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares to cover employees
tax withholdings upon vesting of
non-vested
shares |
|
|
(22,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.24 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned equity compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, March 31, 2011 |
|
|
19,268,791 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
988.8 |
|
|
$ |
86.7 |
|
|
$ |
(79.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(72.3 |
) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
925.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
3
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions of dollars) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Excess tax benefit upon vesting of non-vested shares and dividend
payment on unvested shares expected to vest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Non-cash equity compensation |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Net non-cash LIFO charges |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Non-cash unrealized gains on derivative positions |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Amortization of option premiums (received) / paid, net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Losses on disposition of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other non-cash changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
Receivable from affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Inventories (excluding LIFO charges) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
Payable to affiliate |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Long-term assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
Purchase of available for sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
Cash payment for acquisition of manufacturing facility and related assets (net of $4.9 of cash
received in the acquisition) |
|
|
(83.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(89.4 |
) |
|
|
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of cash convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175.0 |
|
Cash paid for financing costs in connection with issuance of cash convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
Purchase of call option in connection with issuance of cash convertible senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.4 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Repayment of promissory note current portion |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for financing costs in connection with the revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Excess tax benefit upon vesting of non-vested shares and dividend payment
on unvested shares expected to vest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Retirement of common stock |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44.2 |
) |
Cash dividend paid to stockholders |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents during the period |
|
|
(79.7 |
) |
|
|
105.2 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
135.6 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
|
$ |
135.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 16 for supplemental cash flow information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
KAISER
ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
This report should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2010.
Organization and Nature of Operations. Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (together with its
subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires, the Company) specializes in the production
of semi-fabricated specialty aluminum products, with its operations consisting of one reportable
segment in the aluminum industry, referred to herein as Fabricated Products. The Company
also owns a 49% non-controlling interest in Anglesey Aluminium Limited (Anglesey), which owns and
operates a secondary aluminum remelt and casting facility in Holyhead, Wales. See Note
14 for additional information regarding the Companys reportable segment and its other business
units.
Recent acquisitions. On August 9, 2010, the Company acquired the manufacturing facility and
related assets of Nichols Wire, Incorporated (Nichols) in Florence, Alabama (the Florence,
Alabama facility). The Florence, Alabama facility manufactures bare mechanical alloy wire
products, nails and aluminum rod and expands the Companys offerings of small diameter rod, bar and
wire products to the Companys core end market segments for aerospace, general engineering and
automotive applications (see Note 5).
Effective January 1, 2011, the Company acquired the manufacturing facility and related assets
of Alexco, L.L.C. (Alexco) in Chandler, Arizona (the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility).
The Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility manufactures hard alloy extrusions for the aerospace
industry and is a well-established supplier of aerospace extrusions. The acquisition positions the
Company in a significant market segment that provides a natural complement to its product offerings
for aerospace application (see Note 5).
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and are prepared
in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) for interim
financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by
US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements furnished herein include all adjustments (all of which are of a
normal recurring nature unless otherwise noted) necessary to present fairly the results for the
interim periods presented. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated. The consolidated
financial statements include the results of companies acquired by the Company from the effective
date of each acquisition.
As disclosed in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company suspended the use of
the equity method of accounting with respect to its ownership in Anglesey commencing in the quarter
ended September 30, 2009. As a result, the Company did not record equity in income from Anglesey
for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010. The carrying amount of the Companys
investment in Anglesey was zero at both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company does not
anticipate resuming the use of the equity method of accounting with respect to its investment in
Anglesey during the next 12 months.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements. The preparation of financial
statements in accordance with US GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known
to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and
assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Companys consolidated financial statements;
accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and
assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Recognition of Sales. Sales are generally recognized on a gross basis when title, ownership
and risk of loss pass to the buyer and collectability is reasonably assured. A provision for
estimated sales returns from, and allowances to, customers is made in the same period as the
related revenues are recognized, based on historical experience or the specific identification of
an event necessitating a reserve.
From time to time, in the ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into agreements
with customers in which the Company, in return for a fee, agrees to reserve certain amounts of its
existing production capacity to the customer, defer an existing customer purchase commitment into
future periods and reserve certain amounts of its expected production capacity in those periods to
the customer, or cancel or reduce existing commitments under existing contracts. These agreements
may have terms or impact periods exceeding one year.
Certain of the capacity reservation and commitment deferral agreements provide for periodic,
such as quarterly or annual, billing for the duration of the contract. For capacity reservation
agreements, the Company recognizes revenue ratably over the period of the
5
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
capacity reservation. Accordingly, the Company may recognize revenue prior to billing
reservation fees. Unbilled receivables are included within Trade receivables on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheets (See Note 2). For commitment deferral agreements, the Company
recognizes revenue upon the earlier occurrence of the related sale of product or the end of the
commitment period. In connection with other agreements, the Company may collect funds from
customers in advance of the periods for which (i) the production capacity is reserved, (ii)
commitments are deferred, (iii) commitments are reduced or (iv) performance is completed, in which
event the recognition of revenue is deferred until such time as the fee is earned. Any unearned
fees are included within Other accrued liabilities or Long-term liabilities, as appropriate, on the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 2).
In connection with Angleseys remelt operations, the Company purchases secondary aluminum
products from Anglesey in proportion to its ownership interest at prices tied to the market price
of primary aluminum. The Company in turn sells the secondary aluminum products to a third party and
receives a portion of a premium over normal commodity market prices. The transactions are
structured to largely eliminate metal price and currency exchange rate risks with respect to income
and cash flow. As the Company, in substance, acts as an agent in connection with sales of secondary
aluminum produced by Anglesey, the Companys sales of such secondary aluminum are presented net of
cost of sales. For the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the Company reported no
net sales from the sale of secondary aluminum produced by Anglesey. Any amounts payable to Anglesey
are reflected on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets as Payable to affiliate.
Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation is provided to certain employees, directors
and a director emeritus, and is accounted for at fair value. The Company measures the cost of
services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value
of the award and the number of awards expected to ultimately vest. The fair value of awards
provided to the director emeritus is not material. The cost of an award is recognized as an expense
over the requisite service period of the award on a straight-line basis. The Company has elected to
amortize compensation expense for equity awards with graded vesting using the straight-line method
(see Note 9).
The Company also grants performance shares to executive officers and other key employees.
These awards are subject to performance requirements pertaining to the Companys economic value
added (EVA) performance, measured over specified three-year performance periods. The EVA is a
measure of the excess of the Companys adjusted pre-tax operating income for a particular year over
a pre-determined percentage of the adjusted net assets of the immediately preceding year, as
defined in the Companys annual long-term incentive (LTI) programs. The number of performance
shares, if any, that will ultimately vest and result in the issuance of common shares depends on
the average annual EVA achieved for the specified three-year performance periods. The fair value of
performance-based awards is measured based on the most probable outcome of the performance
condition, which is estimated quarterly using the Companys forecast and actual results. The
Company expenses the fair value, after assuming an estimated forfeiture rate, over the specified
three-year performance periods on a ratable basis (see Note 9).
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Finished products,
work-in-process and raw material inventories are stated on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis.
The Company recorded net non-cash LIFO charges of approximately $14.9 and $9.2 during the quarters
ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. These amounts are primarily a result of
changes in metal prices and changes in inventory volumes. Other inventories, principally operating
supplies and repair and maintenance parts, are stated at average cost. Inventory costs consist of
material, labor and manufacturing overhead, including depreciation. Abnormal costs, such as idle
facility expenses, freight, handling costs and spoilage, are accounted for as current period
charges. All of the Companys inventories at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were included in
the Fabricated Products segment. See Note 2 for the components of inventories at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
Property, plant, and equipment net. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost
(see Note 2). Construction in progress is included within Property, Plant, and equipment net in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Interest related to the construction of qualifying assets is
capitalized as part of the construction costs. The aggregate amount of interest capitalized is
limited to the interest expense incurred in the period. The amount of interest expense capitalized
as construction in progress was $0.2 and $0.9 during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March
31, 2010, respectively.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method at rates based on the estimated useful
lives of the various classes of assets. Depreciation expense is not included in Cost of products
sold, excluding depreciation, amortization and other items, but is included in Depreciation and
amortization on the Statements of Consolidated Income. For the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $5.6, and $4.0, respectively, relating
to the Companys operating facilities in its Fabricated Products segment. An immaterial amount of
depreciation expense was also recorded in the Companys Corporate and Other for both periods.
Property, plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets may not be
recoverable. The Company regularly assesses whether events and circumstances with the potential to
trigger impairment have occurred and relies on a number of factors, including operating results,
6
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
business plans, economic projections, and anticipated future cash flow, to make such
assessments. The Company uses an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows of the related
asset or asset group over the estimated remaining life of such asset(s) in measuring whether the
asset(s) are recoverable. Measurement of the amount of impairment, if any, is based on the
difference between the carrying value of the asset(s) and the estimated fair value of such
asset(s). Fair value is determined through a series of standard valuation techniques. See Fair
Values of Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities section of Note 12 for additional information
regarding fair value assessments relating to certain property, plant and equipment.
Property, plant and equipment held for future development are presented as idled assets. Such
assets are evaluated for impairment on a held-and-used basis. Depreciation expense is not adjusted
when assets are temporarily idled.
Available for Sale Securities. Included in Other assets are certain marketable debt and
equity securities, classified as available for sale securities (see Note 2). Such securities are
invested in various investment funds and managed by a third-party trust in connection with the
Companys deferred compensation program (see Note 8). Such securities are recorded at fair value
(see Other section of Note 12,), with net unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes,
reflected in other comprehensive earnings as a component of Stockholders equity.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis during
the third quarter, as well as on an interim basis, as warranted, at the time of relevant events and
changes in circumstances. Intangible assets with definite lives are initially recognized at fair
value and subsequently amortized over the estimated useful lives to reflect the pattern in which
the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed. In the event the pattern cannot be
reliably determined, the Company uses a straight-line amortization method. Whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible assets may not be
recoverable, the intangible assets are reviewed for impairment.
Derivative Financial Instruments. Hedging transactions using derivative financial instruments
are primarily designed to mitigate the Companys exposure to changes in prices for certain of the
products which the Company sells and consumes and, to a lesser extent, to mitigate the Companys
exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. From time-to-time, the Company also enters
into hedging arrangements in connection with financing transactions to mitigate financial risks.
The Company does not utilize derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative
purposes. The Companys derivative activities are initiated within guidelines established by
management and approved by the Companys Board of Directors. Hedging transactions are executed
centrally on behalf of all of the Companys business units to minimize transaction costs, monitor
consolidated net exposures and allow for increased responsiveness to changes in market factors.
The Company recognizes all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in its Consolidated
Balance Sheets and measures these instruments at fair value by marking-to-market all of its
hedging positions at each period-end (see Note 12), as the Company does not meet the documentation
requirements for hedge (deferral) accounting. Unrealized and realized gains and losses associated
with hedges of operational risks are reflected as a reduction or increase in Cost of products sold,
excluding depreciation, amortization and other items. Unrealized and realized gains and losses
relating to hedges of financing transactions are reflected as a component of Other income (expense)
(see Note 17). See Note 11 for additional information about realized and unrealized gains and
losses relating to the Companys derivative financial instruments.
Environmental Contingencies. With respect to environmental loss contingencies, the Company
records a loss contingency whenever a contingency is probable and reasonably estimable. Accruals
for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations are generally recognized at no
later than the completion of the remedial feasibility study. Such accruals are adjusted as further
information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental
remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. Accruals for expected
environmental costs are included in Other accrued liabilities or Long-term liabilities, as
appropriate (see Note 2). Environmental expense relating to continuing operations is included in
Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation, amortization and other items in the Statement of
Consolidated Income. Environmental expense relating to discontinued operations is included in
Selling, administrative, research and development, and general in the Statement of Consolidated
Income.
Self Insurance of Employee Health and Workers Compensation Liabilities. The Company is
primarily self-insured for group health insurance and workers compensation benefits provided to
employees. The Company purchases stop-loss insurance to protect against annual health insurance
claims per individual and at an aggregate level. Self insurance liabilities are estimated for
claims incurred-but-not-paid based on judgment, using the Companys historical claim data and
information and analysis provided by actuarial and claim advisors, our insurance carriers and other
professionals. The accrued liability for health insurance and worker compensation claims is
included in Other accrued liabilities or Long-term liabilities, as appropriate (See Note 2).
7
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial arrangements which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist of metal, currency, electricity and natural gas derivative
contracts, certain cash-settled call options that the Company purchased in March 2010 (the Call
Options) (see Note 3), and arrangements related to the Companys cash equivalents. If the market
value of the Companys net commodity and currency derivative positions with certain counterparties
exceeds the applicable threshold, if any, the counterparty is required to transfer cash collateral
in excess of the threshold to the Company. Conversely, if the market value of these net derivative
positions falls below a specified threshold, the Company is required to transfer cash collateral
below the threshold to certain counterparties. At both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
Company had no margin deposits with or from its counterparties.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties on
derivative contracts used in hedging activities as well as failure of counterparties to return cash
collateral previously transferred to the counterparties. The counterparties to the Companys
derivative contracts are major financial institutions, and the Company does not expect
nonperformance by any of its counterparties.
The Company places its cash in bank deposits and money market funds with high credit quality
financial institutions which invest primarily in commercial paper and time deposits of prime
quality, short-term repurchase agreements, and U.S. government agency notes. The Company has not
experienced losses on its temporary cash investments.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-28, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, When to
Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying
Amounts (ASU 2010-28). ASU 2010-28 amends Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting
units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to
perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill
impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment
exists, an entity should consider whether there are any events or circumstances that would more
likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This ASU is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15,
2010. Early adoption was not permitted. The adoption of ASU 2010-28 in the quarter ending March 31,
2011 did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
ASU No. 2010-29, Business Combinations, Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations (ASU 2010-29), was issued in December 2010 to provide clarification
regarding pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations. ASU
2010-29 specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity
should disclose only revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the
comparable prior annual reporting period. This ASU also expands the supplemental pro forma
disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma
adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma
revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on
or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption was permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2010-29 during
the first interim reporting period of 2011 as it relates to pro forma disclosure of the Companys
acquisition of the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility, effective January 1, 2011 (see Note 5).
2. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Trade Receivables. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed trade receivables |
|
$ |
111.3 |
|
|
$ |
82.5 |
|
Unbilled trade receivables Note 1 |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, gross |
|
|
114.6 |
|
|
|
83.6 |
|
Allowance for doubtful receivables |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
$ |
114.0 |
|
|
$ |
83.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finished products |
|
$ |
54.1 |
|
|
$ |
53.8 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
49.6 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
Operating supplies and repairs and maintenance parts |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
169.6 |
|
|
$ |
167.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative assets Note 11 |
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
Current portion of option premiums paid Note11 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Short-term restricted cash |
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Prepaid taxes |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
90.3 |
|
|
$ |
80.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
344.8 |
|
|
|
338.0 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active property, plant and equipment, gross |
|
|
422.2 |
|
|
|
412.5 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(69.6 |
) |
|
|
(63.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
352.6 |
|
|
|
348.6 |
|
Idled equipment |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
|
$ |
358.1 |
|
|
$ |
354.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets Note 11 |
|
$ |
49.1 |
|
|
$ |
50.8 |
|
Option premiums paid Note 11 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
Long-term income tax receivable |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Available for sale securities |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
74.0 |
|
|
$ |
83.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Accrued Liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative liabilities Note 11 |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
Current portion of option premiums received Note 11 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Current portion of income tax liabilities |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Accrued income taxes and taxes payable |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Accrued annual VEBA contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Accrued freight |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Short-term environmental accrual Note 10 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Short-term deferred revenue Note 1 |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
42.5 |
|
|
$ |
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities Note 11 |
|
$ |
57.8 |
|
|
$ |
62.2 |
|
Option premiums received Note 11 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Income tax liabilities |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Workers compensation accruals |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Long-term environmental accrual Note 10 |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
Long-term asset retirement obligations |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue Note 1 |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Deferred compensation liability |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
130.1 |
|
|
$ |
134.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
3. Cash Convertible Senior Notes and Related Transactions
Indenture. On March 29, 2010, the Company issued cash convertible senior notes (the Notes)
in the aggregate principal amount of $175.0 pursuant to an indenture by and between the Company and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (the Indenture). Net proceeds from this
transaction were approximately $169.2, after deducting the initial purchasers discounts and
transaction fees and expenses. The Notes bear a stated interest rate of 4.50% per annum. The
Company accounts for the cash conversion feature of the Notes (the Bifurcated Conversion Feature)
as a separate derivative instrument. The fair value of the Bifurcated Conversion Feature on the
issuance date of the Notes was recorded as the original issue discount for purposes of accounting
for the debt component of the Notes. At issuance, the original issue discount relating to the Notes
was $38.1, which will be amortized based on the effective interest method over the term of the
Notes. Interest expense greater than the interest rate of 4.50% will be recognized over the term of
the Notes, primarily due to the accretion of the discounted carrying value of the Notes to their
face amount. The initial purchasers discounts and transaction fees and expenses totaling $5.8 were
capitalized as deferred financing costs and will be amortized over the term of the Notes using the
effective interest method. The effective interest rate of the Notes is approximately 11% per annum.
Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. The Notes will
mature on April 1, 2015, subject to earlier repurchase or conversion upon the occurrence of certain
events. Holders may convert their Notes before January 1, 2015, only in certain circumstances
determined by (i) the market price of the Companys common stock, (ii) the trading price of the
Notes or (iii) the occurrence of specified corporate events. The Notes can be converted by the
holders at any time on or after January 1, 2015 until the close of business on the second scheduled
trading date immediately preceding the maturity date of the Notes. The Notes are subject to
repurchase by the Company at the option of the holders following a fundamental change, as defined
in the Indenture, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus any accrued
and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. Fundamental changes
include, but are not limited to, (i) certain ownership changes, (ii) certain recapitalizations,
mergers and dispositions, (iii) shareholders approval of any plan or proposal for the liquidation,
or dissolution of the Company, and (iv) the failure of the Companys common stock to be listed on
the New York Stock Exchange, the NASDAQ Global Select Market or the NASDAQ Global Market. The
Notes have an initial conversion rate of 20.6949 shares of common stock per (in whole dollars)
$1,000 principal amount of the Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately
$48.32 per share, representing a 26% conversion premium over the closing price of $38.35 per share
of the Companys common stock on March 23, 2010), subject to adjustment, based on the occurrence of
certain events, including, but not limited to, (i) the issuance of certain dividends on the
Companys common stock, (ii) the issuance of certain rights, options or warrants, (iii) the
effectuation of share splits or combinations, (iv) certain distributions of property, and (v)
certain issuer tender or exchange offers as described in the Indenture, with the amount due on
conversion payable in cash. The Notes are not convertible into the Companys common stock or any
other securities under any circumstances, but instead will be settled in cash.
The following provides additional information regarding the Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Principal amount |
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
Less: unamortized issuance discount |
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount, net of discount |
|
$ |
143.0 |
|
|
$ |
141.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Contractual coupon interest |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Amortization of discount and deferred financing costs |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense1 |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
A portion of the interest relating to the Notes is capitalized as Construction in progress. |
See Other section of Note 12 for information relating to the estimated fair value of the Notes.
Convertible Note Hedge Transactions. On March 23 and March 26, 2010, the Company purchased the
Call Options from several financial institutions (the Option Counterparties). The Call Options
have an exercise price equal to the conversion price of the
10
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
Notes, subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to the anti-dilution
adjustments for the Notes. The Call Options will expire upon the maturity of the Notes. The Company
paid an aggregate amount of approximately $31.4 to the Option Counterparties for the Call Options.
The Call Options are expected to generally reduce the Companys exposure to potential cash
payments in excess of the principal amount of the Notes that it may be required to make upon the
conversion of the Notes. If the market price per share of the Companys common stock at the time of
cash conversion of any Notes is above the strike price of the Call Options (which initially equals
to the initial conversion price of the Notes of approximately $48.32 per share of the Companys
common stock), the Company is entitled to receive from the Option Counterparties in an aggregate
amount equaling the amount of cash that the Company would be required to deliver to the holder of
the converted Notes, less the principal amount thereof.
On March 23 and March 26, 2010, the Company also entered into warrant transactions pursuant to
which the Company sold to the Option Counterparties net-share-settled warrants (the Warrants)
relating to approximately 3.6 million shares of the Companys common stock. The warrants expire on
July 1, 2015. The Option Counterparties paid an aggregate amount of approximately $14.3 to the
Company for the Warrants.
If the market price per share of the Companys common stock, as measured under the terms of
the Warrants, exceeds the strike price of the Warrants, which initially equals $61.36 per share
(representing a 60% premium over the closing price of $38.35 per share of the Companys common
stock on March 23, 2010), the Company will be obligated to issue to the Option Counterparties
shares of the Companys common stock having a value equal to such excess, as measured under the
terms of the Warrants. The Warrants may not be exercised prior to the expiration date.
The Warrants meet the definition of derivatives; however, because the Warrants are indexed to
the Companys common stock and have been determined to meet the requirement to be classified as
equity instruments, they are not subject to fair value accounting.
The Call Options and Warrant transactions are separate transactions entered into by the
Company with the Option Counterparties, and are not part of the terms of the Notes and do not
affect the rights of holders under the Notes.
4. Secured Debt and Credit Facilities
Secured debt and credit facilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other notes payable |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Less current portion of secured debt and credit facilities |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term secured debt and credit facilities |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Facility. On March 23, 2010, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries
entered into a $200.0 revolving credit facility with a group of lenders (the Revolving Credit
Facility), of which up to a maximum of $60.0 may be utilized for letters of credit. Under the
Revolving Credit Facility, the Company is able to borrow from time to time an aggregate amount
equal to the lesser of $200.0 or a borrowing base comprised of approximately 85% of eligible
accounts receivable and approximately 65% of eligible inventory, reduced by certain reserves, all
as specified in the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility matures in March 2014,
at which time all amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility will be due and payable.
Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to either a base prime
rate or LIBOR, at the Companys option, plus, in each case, a specified variable percentage
determined by reference to the then-remaining borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit
Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility may, subject to certain conditions and the agreement of
lenders thereunder, be increased up to $250.0.
Amounts owed under the Revolving Credit Facility may be accelerated upon the occurrence of
various events of default including, without limitation, the failure to make principal or interest
payments when due and breaches of covenants, representations and warranties set forth in the
Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility places limitations on the ability of the
Company and certain of its subsidiaries to, among other things, grant liens, engage in mergers,
sell assets, incur debt, make investments, undertake transactions with affiliates, pay dividends
and repurchase shares. In addition, the Company is required to maintain a fixed
11
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
charge coverage ratio on a consolidated basis at or above 1.1 to 1.0 if borrowing availability
under the Revolving Credit Facility is less than $30.
The Revolving Credit Facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the
accounts receivable, inventory and certain other related assets and proceeds of the Company and its
domestic operating subsidiaries. At March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Company capitalized $3.4 of financing costs in connection with the Revolving Credit
Facility which are amortized over the term of the Revolving Credit Facility on a straight-line
basis. At March 31, 2011, $2.5 of deferred financing costs remained on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
At March 31, 2011, based on the borrowing base determination in effect as of that date, the
Company had under the Revolving Credit Facility borrowing availability of $200.0, of which $9.8 was
being used to support outstanding letters of credit, leaving $190.2 of availability. There were no
borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility at March 31, 2011, but the interest rate applicable
to any borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility would have been 5.25% at March 31, 2011 for
overnight borrowings.
Other Notes Payable. In connection with the Companys acquisition of the Florence, Alabama
facility on August 9, 2010 (Note 5), a promissory note in the amount of $6.7 (the Nichols
Promissory Note) was issued to Nichols as a part of the consideration paid. The Nichols Promissory
Note bears interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum. Accrued but unpaid interest is due quarterly
through maturity of the Nichols Promissory Note on August 9, 2015. The Company has the option to
repay all or a portion of the Nichols Promissory Note at any time prior to the maturity date.
Principal payments on the Nichols Promissory Note are due in equal quarterly installments. The
Nichols Promissory Note is secured by certain real property and equipment included in the assets
acquired from Nichols in the acquisition. At March 31, 2011, the outstanding principal balance
under the Nichols Promissory Note was $5.7, of which $1.3 was payable within 12 months. For the
quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded $0.1 of interest expense related to the Nichols
Promissory Note.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company also had a $7.0 outstanding promissory note (the LA
Promissory Note) in connection with the Companys purchase of the previously leased land and
buildings associated with its Los Angeles, California facility in December 2008. Interest is
payable on the unpaid principal balance of the LA Promissory Note monthly in arrears at the prime
rate, as defined in the LA Promissory Note, plus 1.5%, in no event exceeding 10% per annum. A
principal payment of $3.5 will be due on January 1, 2012, and the remaining $3.5 will be due on
January 1, 2013. The LA Promissory Note is secured by a deed of trust on the property. For both
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the Company incurred $0.1 of interest expense
relating to the LA Promissory Note. The interest rate applicable to the LA Promissory Note was
4.75% at March 31, 2011.
5. Acquisitions
Alexco. Effective January 1, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all
of the assets of Alexco, a manufacturer of hard alloy extrusions for the aerospace industry, based
in Chandler, Arizona.
The Company paid net cash consideration of $83.2 (net of $4.9 of cash received in the
acquisition) on January 3, 2011, with existing cash on hand, and assumed certain liabilities
totaling approximately $1.0. Total acquisition related expenses were $0.5, of which $0.1 was
included in the Companys consolidated results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
Such expenses are included within Selling, administrative, research and development, and general
expenses.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the effective date of the acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of purchase price: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
3.6 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
6.6 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Definite-lived intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
34.7 |
|
Order backlog |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Trademark and trade name |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
34.1 |
|
Accounts payable and other current liabilities |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid |
|
$ |
88.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
12
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
Goodwill arising from this transaction reflects (i) the expected synergistic benefits to the
Company, as the products manufactured by the acquired operation are expected to complement the
Companys other offerings of sheet, plate, cold finish and drawn tube products for aerospace
applications and (ii) the calculation of the fair value of the other assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in this transaction. Goodwill arising from this transaction is anticipated to
be deductible for tax purposes over the next 15 years.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the Company summarizes the results
of operations for the periods indicated as if the Alexco acquisition had been completed as of
January 1, 2010, the first day of the earliest period presented in the Statements of Consolidated
Income included in this Report. This pro forma financial information considers principally (i) the
Companys unaudited financial results, (ii) the unaudited historical financial results of Alexco,
as supplied to the Company, and (iii) select pro forma adjustments to the historical financial
results of Alexco. Such pro forma adjustments represent principally estimates of (i) cost synergies
from integration of the acquired operation into the Companys existing business, (ii) the impact of
the hypothetical amortization of acquired intangible assets and the recognition of fair value
adjustments relating to tangible assets in pre-tax income in each period, and (iii) the pro forma
impact of the transaction on the Companys tax provision in each period. These pro forma
adjustments did not have a material impact on the pro forma Net income, as presented below. The
following pro forma data does not purport to be indicative of the results of future operations or
of the results that would have actually occurred had the acquisition taken place at the beginning
of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales (combined)1 |
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
274.4 |
|
Net income (combined)1 |
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share (combined)1 |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
The combined results presented for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 are the actual results presented in the
Statement of Consolidated Income for such period, as the operating results for the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion)
facility were included in the Companys consolidated operating results commencing January 1, 2011 (see Note 1). |
The following information presents select financial data relating to the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion)
facility, as included within the Companys consolidated operating results, for the period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
Net income before income taxes |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Nichols. On August 9, 2010, the Company acquired the Florence, Alabama facility, which
manufactures bare mechanical alloy wire products, nails and aluminum rod for aerospace, general
engineering, and automotive applications.
13
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
Consideration consisted of (i) $9.0 in cash, (ii) the $6.7 Nichols Promissory Note from the
Company to Nichols (Note 4), and (iii) the assumption of certain liabilities totaling approximately
$2.1. Total acquisition-related costs were approximately $0.8, all of which were expensed through
December 31, 2010 and included in Selling, administrative, research and development, and general in
the Statement of Consolidated Income. The acquisition did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
The following table summarizes recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2.3 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets with definite lives |
|
|
4.3 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid |
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
The goodwill of $3.1 arising from the acquisition represents
the commercial opportunity for the Company to sell
small-diameter rod, bar and wire products, as a complement
to its other products, to its core markets and end market
segment applications and is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes over the next 15 years.
6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
A roll-forward of goodwill from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 is as follows (see Note 5 for additional information about the Companys business acquisitions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
Goodwill arising from Alexco acquisition |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
37.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
All of the Companys goodwill is included in the Fabricated Products segment.
Identifiable intangible assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are comprised of the following:
March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
useful life |
|
|
Original cost |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
Net book value |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
25 |
|
|
$ |
38.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
38.0 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Trademark and trade name |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
24 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
useful life |
|
|
Original cost |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
Net book value |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
Backlog |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense relating to definite-lived intangible assets is recorded in the Fabricated Products segment. Such expense was $0.6 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The expected amortization
of intangible assets for the next five calendar years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
2012 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
7. Income Tax Matters
Tax Provision. The provision for income taxes for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax provision for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was $6.4, or an effective tax
rate of 36.3%. The difference between the effective tax rate and the projected blended statutory
tax rate was primarily the result of a decrease in the valuation allowance, due to a change in tax
law in the State of Illinois of $0.8, resulting in a 4.6% decrease in the effective tax rate,
partially offset by (i) an increase in unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties
of $0.3, resulting in a 1.7% increase in the effective tax rate and (ii) the impact of a
non-deductible compensation expense of $0.2, resulting in a 1.3% increase in the effective tax
rate.
Deferred Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes
and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had $882.6 of net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards
available to reduce future cash payments for income taxes in the U.S. Of the $882.6 of NOL
carryforwards at December 31, 2010, $1.7 consists of excess tax benefits from employee restricted
stock. Equity will be increased by $1.7 if and when such excess tax benefits are ultimately
realized. The NOL carryforwards expire periodically through 2030. The Company also had $31.1 of
alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforwards with an indefinite life, available to offset
regular federal income tax requirements.
To preserve the NOL carryforwards that may be available to the Company, (i) the Companys
certificate of incorporation includes certain restrictions on the transfer of the Companys common
stock and (ii) the Company entered into a stock transfer restriction agreement with the Union VEBA
(which remained the Companys largest stockholder as of March 31, 2011).
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is
more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers taxable
15
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
income in carryback years, the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning
strategies and projected future taxable income in making this assessment. Due to uncertainties
surrounding the realization of some of the Companys deferred tax assets, including state NOLs
sustained during the prior years and expiring tax benefits, the Company had a valuation allowance
against its deferred tax assets of $19.3 and $20.1 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. When recognized, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of this valuation
allowance will be recorded as a reduction of income tax expense.
Other. The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Canada Revenue Agency audited the
Companys tax returns for fiscal years 1998 through 2001 and issued assessment notices for which
Notices of Objection have been filed. In addition, the Canada Revenue Agency has audited the
Companys tax returns for fiscal years 2002 through 2004 and issued assessment notices, as a result
of which $7.9 has been paid to the Canada Revenue Agency against previously accrued tax reserves in
the third quarter of 2009. There is an additional Canadian Provincial income tax assessment of
$1.2, including interest, resulting from the audit of the Companys tax returns for fiscal years
2002 through 2004 that is anticipated to be paid against previously accrued tax reserves in next 12
months. The Companys tax returns for certain past years are still subject to examination by taxing
authorities, and the use of NOL carryforwards in future periods could trigger a review of
attributes and other tax matters in years that are not otherwise subject to examination.
No U.S. federal or state liability has been recorded for the undistributed earnings of the
Companys Canadian subsidiary at March 31, 2011. These undistributed earnings are considered to be
indefinitely reinvested. Accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income taxes or
foreign withholding taxes has been provided on such undistributed earnings. Determination of the
potential amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability and foreign withholding taxes
is not practicable because of the complexities associated with such hypothetical calculation.
The Company has gross unrecognized benefits relating to uncertain tax positions. If and when
such gross unrecognized tax benefits are ultimately recognized, it will go through the Companys
income tax provision and affect the effective tax rate in future periods.
The Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $15.5 and $15.0 at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. The change during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was primarily
due to foreign currency fluctuations and change in tax positions.
In addition, the Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits in the income tax provision. The Company had $6.9 and $6.6 accrued at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, for interest and penalties. Of these amounts, $0.4 was recorded as
current liabilities and included in Other accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company recognized an increase in interest and penalty of
$0.3 and $0.4 in its tax provision in the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010,
respectively.
In connection with the gross unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalty)
denominated in foreign currency, we incurred a foreign currency translation adjustment. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2011, the foreign currency impact on such liabilities resulted in a $0.4
currency translation adjustment which was recorded within Other comprehensive income.
The Company expects its gross unrecognized tax benefits to be reduced by $1.7 within the next
12 months.
8. Employee Benefits
Pension and Similar Plans. Pensions and similar plans include:
|
|
|
Monthly contributions of (in whole dollars) $1.00 per hour worked by each bargaining unit
employee to the appropriate multi-employer pension plans sponsored by the United Steel,
Paper and Foresting, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers
International Union AFL-CIO, CLC (USW) and International Association of Machinists and
certain other unions at certain of the Companys production facilities, except that (i) the
monthly contributions per hour worked by each bargaining unit employee to a pension plan
sponsored by the USW at the Companys Newark, Ohio and Spokane, Washington facilities
increased to (in whole dollars) $1.25 starting July 2010 and will increase to (in whole
dollars) $1.50 in July 2015 and (ii) monthly contributions to a pension plan sponsored by
the USW at the Companys newly acquired Florence, Alabama facility are (in whole dollars)
$1.25 per hour worked by each bargaining unit employee. The Company currently estimates that
contributions will range from $2.0 to $4.0 per year through 2013. |
|
|
|
|
A defined contribution 401(k) savings plan for
hourly bargaining unit employees at eight of the Companys production facilities.
For active bargaining unit employees at four of these production facilities, the Company
is required to make contributions to this plan ranging |
16
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
from (in whole dollars) $800 to $2,400 per
employee per year, depending on the employees age.
For active bargaining unit employees at two other production facilities,
the Company provides for (i) a concurrent match of up to 4% of certain contributions
made by employees and (ii) an annual contribution of between 2% and 10% of their compensation
to employees hired prior to January 1, 2004, depending on their age and years of service, or
a fixed 2% annual contribution to employees hired on or after January 1, 2004. The Company
currently estimates that contributions to such plans will range from $1.0 to $3.0 per year. |
|
|
|
|
A defined contribution 401(k) savings plan for salaried and certain hourly employees
providing for a concurrent match of up to 4% of certain contributions made by employees plus
an annual contribution of between 2% and 10% of their compensation depending on their age
and years of service. All new hires after January 1, 2004 receive a fixed 2% contribution
annually. The Company currently estimates that contributions to such plan will range from
$4.0 to $6.0 per year. |
|
|
|
|
A defined benefit plan for salaried employees at the Companys London, Ontario facility,
with annual contributions based on each salaried employees age and years of service. At
December 31, 2010, approximately 62% of the plan assets were invested in equity securities
and 36% of plan assets were invested in debt securities. The remaining plan assets were
invested in short-term securities. The Companys investment committee reviews and evaluates
the investment portfolio. The asset mix target allocation on the long-term investments is
approximately 60% in equity securities and 36% in debt securities with the remaining assets
in short-term securities. See Note 12 for additional information regarding the fair values
of the Canadian pension plan assets. |
|
|
|
|
A non-qualified, unfunded, unsecured plan of deferred compensation for key employees who
would otherwise suffer a loss of benefits under the Companys defined contribution plan, as
a result of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Despite the plan being an
unfunded plan, the Company makes an annual contribution to a rabbi trust to fulfill future
funding obligations, as contemplated by the terms of the plan. The assets in the trust are
at all times subject to the claims of the Companys general creditors, and no participant
has a claim to any assets of the trust. Plan participants are eligible to receive
distributions from the trust subject to vesting and other eligibility requirements. Assets
in the rabbi trust relating to the deferred compensation plan are accounted for as available
for sale securities and are included as Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Note 2). Liabilities relating to the deferred compensation plan are included on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-term liabilities (Note 2). |
|
|
|
|
An employment agreement with the Companys chief executive officer which extends through
July 6, 2015. The Company also provides certain members of senior management, including each
of the Companys named executive officers, with benefits related to terminations of
employment in specified circumstances, including in connection with a change in control, by
the Company without cause and by the named executive officer with good reason. |
Postretirement Medical Obligations. As a part of the Companys reorganization, the Companys
postretirement medical plan was terminated in 2004. Participants were given the option of coverage
under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) or participation in the
applicable voluntary employees beneficiary association (VEBA), the VEBA that provides benefits
for certain union retirees, their surviving spouses and eligible dependents (the Union VEBA) or
the VEBA that provides benefits for certain other eligible retirees, their surviving spouse and
eligible dependents (the Salaried VEBA). Qualifying bargaining unit employees who do not, or are
not eligible to, elect COBRA coverage are covered by the Union VEBA. The Salaried VEBA covers
certain retirees who retired prior to the 2004 termination of the prior plan or who subsequently
have retired or will retire with the required age and service requirements so long as their
employment commenced prior to February 2002. The benefits paid by the VEBAs are at the sole
discretion of the respective VEBA trustees and are outside the Companys control.
The Companys only financial obligations to the VEBAs are (i) an annual variable cash
contribution payable to the Union VEBA and the Salaried VEBA and (ii) an obligation to pay one-half
of the administrative expenses of the VEBAs, up to $0.3 per year. The obligation to the Union VEBA
with respect to the annual variable cash contribution extends through September 30, 2017
(reflecting a five-year extension agreed by the Company in January 2010 in connection with the
renewal and ratification of a labor agreement with the members of the USW at the Companys Newark,
Ohio and Spokane, Washington facilities), while the obligation to the Salaried VEBA has no
termination date. The amount to be contributed to the VEBAs through September 2017 pursuant to the
Companys obligation is 10% of the first $20.0 of annual cash flow (as defined; in general terms,
the principal elements of cash flow are earnings before interest expense, provision for income
taxes, and depreciation and amortization less cash payments for, among other things, interest,
income taxes and capital expenditures), plus 20% of annual cash flow, as defined, in excess of
$20.0. Such annual payments may not exceed $20.0 and are also limited (with no carryover to future
years) to the extent that the payments would cause the Companys liquidity to be less than $50.0.
Such amounts are determined on an annual basis and payable within 120 days following the end of the
fiscal year, or within 15 days following the date on which the Company files its Annual Report on
Form 10-K with the SEC (or, if no such report is required to be filed, within 15 days of the
delivery of the independent auditors opinion of the Companys
17
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
annual financial statements), whichever is earlier. The Union VEBA is managed by four trustees
(two appointed by the Company and two appointed by the USW), and the assets are managed by an
independent fiduciary.
Amounts owing by the Company to the VEBAs are recorded in the Companys Consolidated Balance
Sheets under Other accrued liabilities, with a corresponding increase in Net assets in respect of
VEBAs. At December 31, 2010, the Company had preliminarily determined that $2.1 was owed to the
VEBAs (comprised of $1.8 to the Union VEBA and $0.3 to the Salaried VEBA). These amounts were paid
during the first quarter of 2011, along with an additional payment of $0.1, based on the final
computation of the 2010 results.
For accounting purposes, after discussions with the staff of the SEC, the Company treats the
postretirement medical benefits to be paid by the VEBAs and the Companys related annual variable
contribution obligations as defined benefit postretirement plans with the current VEBA assets and
future variable contributions described above, and earnings thereon, operating as a cap on the
benefits to be paid. While the Company has no control over the plan assets and its only financial
obligations to the VEBAs are to pay the annual variable contribution amount and certain
administrative fees, the Company nonetheless accounts for net periodic postretirement benefit and
records any difference between the assets of each VEBA and its accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation in the Companys financial statements. Information necessary for the valuation of the
net funded status of the plans must be obtained from the Salaried VEBA and Union VEBA on an annual
basis. It is possible that existing assets may be insufficient to fund the accumulated benefit
obligation resulting in a negative net funded position on the Companys Consolidated Balance
Sheets; however, the Company has no obligation to fund either the Salaried VEBA or the Union VEBA
beyond the annual variable cash contributions as determined.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Income) The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit
cost (income) for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
VEBAs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
Deferred compensation plans |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Defined contributions plans |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Multiemployer pension plans |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present the allocation of these charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Fabricated Products segment |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Corporate and Other segment |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For all periods presented, the net periodic benefits relating to the VEBAs are included as a
component of Selling, administrative, research and development and general expense within All Other
and substantially all of the Fabricated Products segments related charges are in Cost of products
sold, excluding depreciation, amortization and other items with the balance in Selling,
administrative, research and development and general.
18
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
As of March 31, 2011, the Union VEBA owned approximately 17% of the Companys issued and
outstanding shares of common stock, or 3,306,938 common shares, all of which have been registered
for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or may be sold in transactions exempt from
securities laws, including under Rule 144. However, a stock transfer restriction agreement between
the Union VEBA and the Company restricts the number of shares of the Companys common stock that
generally may be sold by the Union VEBA during any 12-month period without further approval of our
Board of Directors to 1,321,485. Shares owned by the Union VEBA that are subject to the stock
transfer restriction agreement are treated as being similar to treasury stock (i.e. as a reduction
of Stockholders equity) in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, the Union VEBA sold 217,042 shares of the Companys common stock permitted under
the stock transfer restriction agreement. The 217,042 shares sold resulted in (i) an increase of
$10.6 in VEBA assets (at a weighted-average price of $49.06 per share realized by the Union VEBA),
(ii) a reduction of $5.2 in common stock owned by Union VEBA (at $24.02 per share reorganization
value) and (iii) the difference between the two amounts, net of tax adjustment, was credited to
Additional capital.
See Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional information with respect to
the VEBAs and key assumptions used with respect to the Companys pension plans and key assumptions
made in computing the net obligation of each VEBA.
9. Employee Incentive Plans
Short-term Incentive Plans
The Company has a short-term incentive compensation plan for senior management and certain
corporate employees payable at the Companys election in cash, shares of common stock, or a
combination of cash and shares of common stock. Amounts earned under the plan are based primarily
on EVA of the Companys core Fabricated Products business, adjusted for certain safety and
performance factors. Most of the Companys production facilities have similar programs for both
hourly and salaried employees. During the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the
Company recorded the following charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
Selling, administrative, research and development and general |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense recorded in connection with short-term incentive plans |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the allocation of these charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Fabricated Products segment |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
All Other |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense recorded in connection with short-term incentive plans |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long- term Incentive Plans
General. Officers and other key employees of the Company or one or more of its subsidiaries,
as well as directors and directors emeritus of the Company, are eligible to participate in the
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (as amended, the Equity
Incentive Plan). The Equity Incentive Plan permits the granting of awards in the form of options
to purchase common shares, stock appreciation rights, shares of non-vested and vested stock,
restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other awards. The Equity
Incentive Plan will expire on July 6, 2016, and no grants will be made after that date. The
Companys Board of Directors may, in its discretion, terminate the Equity Incentive Plan at any
time. The termination of the Equity Incentive Plan will not affect the rights of participants or
their successors under any awards outstanding and not exercised in full on the date of termination,
and all grants made on or prior to the date of termination will continue in effect thereafter
subject to the terms thereof and of the Equity Incentive Plan. Subject to certain adjustments that
may be required from time-to-time to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of participants
under the Equity Incentive Plan, a total of 2,722,222 common shares have been
19
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
authorized for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan. At March 31, 2011, 851,219 common
shares were available for additional awards under the Equity Incentive Plan.
Compensation charges, all of which are included in Selling, administrative, research and
development and general expenses, related to the Equity Incentive Plan for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Service-based vested and non-vested common shares and restricted stock units |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Performance shares |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Service-based stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense recorded in connection with the Equity Incentive Plan |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the allocation of these charges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Fabricated Products segment |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
All Other |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense recorded in connection with the Equity Incentive Plan |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested Common Shares, Restricted Stock Units, and Performance Shares. The Company grants
non-vested common shares to its non-employee directors, directors emeritus, executive officers and
other key employees. The non-vested common shares granted to non-employee directors and a director
emeritus are generally subject to a one-year vesting requirement. The non-vested common shares
granted to executive officers and senior management are generally subject to a three-year cliff
vesting requirement. The non-vested common shares granted to other key employees are generally
subject to a three-year graded vesting requirement. In addition to non-vested common shares, the
Company also grants restricted stock units to certain employees. The restricted stock units have
rights similar to the rights of non-vested common shares, and the employee will receive one common
share for each restricted stock unit upon the vesting of the restricted stock unit. With the
exception of restricted stock units granted to eligible employees of the Companys French
subsidiary, restricted stock units vest one-third on the first anniversary of the grant date and
one-third on each of the second and third anniversaries of the date of issuance. Restricted stock
units granted to eligible employees of the Companys French subsidiary vest two-thirds on the
second anniversary of the grant date and one-third on the third anniversary of the grant date.
The fair value of the non-vested common shares and restricted stock units are based on the
grant date market value of the common shares and amortized over the requisite service period on a
straight-line basis, after assuming an estimated forfeiture rate. From time-to-time, the Company
issues common shares to non-employee directors electing to receive common shares in lieu of all or
a portion of their annual retainer fees. The fair value of these common shares is based on the fair
value of the shares at the date of issuance and is immediately recognized in earnings as a period
expense. No such shares were granted to non-employee directors for the quarters ended March 31,
2011 and March 31, 2010.
The Company grants performance shares to executive officers and other key employees under the
Companys long-term incentive (LTI) programs. Awards under existing programs are subject to
performance requirements pertaining to the Companys EVA performance, measured over a three-year
performance period. EVA is a measure of the excess of the Companys adjusted pre-tax operating
income for a particular year over a pre-determined percentage of the adjusted net assets of the
immediately preceding year. The number of performance shares, if any, that will ultimately vest and
result in the issuance of common shares depends on the average annual EVA achieved for the
specified three-year performance periods. Under the 2008-2010 LTI program, 10,585 performance
shares vested during the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The vesting of performance shares and
related issuance and delivery of common shares, if any, under the 2009-2011 LTI program, 2010-2012
LTI program and 2011-2013 LTI program will occur in 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively. Holders of
performance shares do not receive voting rights through the ownership of such performance shares.
The fair value of performance-based awards is measured based on the most probable outcome of
the performance condition, which is estimated quarterly using the Companys forecast and actual
results. The Company expenses the fair value, after assuming an estimated forfeiture rate, over the
specified three-year performance periods on a ratable basis.
20
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
The fair value of the non-vested common shares, restricted stock units, and performance shares
was determined based on the closing trading price of the common shares on the grant date. A summary
of the activity with respect to non-vested common shares and restricted stock units for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Vested |
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Stock Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value per Share |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Value per Unit |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
268,864 |
|
|
$ |
27.91 |
|
|
|
7,872 |
|
|
$ |
21.74 |
|
Granted |
|
|
63,303 |
|
|
|
46.59 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
46.59 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(46,464 |
) |
|
|
56.63 |
|
|
|
(3,314 |
) |
|
|
16.83 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
285,703 |
|
|
$ |
27.38 |
|
|
|
6,740 |
|
|
$ |
32.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the activity with respect to the performance shares for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
per Share |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
686,895 |
|
|
$ |
26.84 |
|
Granted |
|
|
186,918 |
|
|
|
46.59 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(10,585 |
) |
|
|
74.34 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(68,799 |
) |
|
|
74.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
794,429 |
|
|
$ |
26.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, 82,867 non-vested common shares, 2,362 shares of
restricted stock units and 205,789 performance shares were granted to employees. Each of the
foregoing grants has a weighted-average grant date fair value per share of $34.13, $36.23 and
$34.13, respectively. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, 13,050 non-vested shares and 523
restricted stock units vested. The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of the
non-vested shares and restricted stock units that vested during such period were $22.39 and $24.63,
respectively. There were no performance shares that vested during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2011, there was $5.3 of unrecognized gross compensation cost related to the
non-vested common shares and the restricted stock units and $5.9 of unrecognized gross compensation
cost related to the performance shares. The cost related to the non-vested common shares and the
restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years,
and the cost related to the performance shares is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of 2.7 years.
Under the Equity Incentive Plan, participants may elect to have the Company withhold common
shares to satisfy statutory tax withholding obligations arising in connection with non-vested
shares, restricted stock units, stock options, and performance shares. When the Company withholds
the shares, it is required to remit to the appropriate taxing authorities the fair value of the
shares withheld and such shares are cancelled immediately. During quarter ended March 31, 2011,
22,862 common shares were withheld and cancelled for this purpose, and no shares were withheld or
cancelled for this purpose during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Stock Options. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had 22,077 fully-vested and exercisable
outstanding options for executives and other key employees to purchase its common shares. The
options were granted on April 3, 2007 at an exercise price of $80.01 per share and have a remaining
contractual life of 6.0 years. The average fair value of the options granted was $39.90. No new
options were granted, and no existing options were forfeited or exercised during the quarter ended
March 31, 2011.
21
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
At March 31, 2011, there was no unrecognized gross compensation expense related to stock
options, as all unvested options became fully vested on April 3, 2010.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments. The Company and its subsidiaries have a variety of financial commitments,
including purchase agreements, forward foreign exchange and forward sales contracts, indebtedness
(and related Call Options and Warrants) and letters of credit (Notes 3, 4 and 11).
Minimum rental commitments under operating leases at March 31, 2011, are as follows: years
ending December 31, 2011 $7.5; 2012 $6.9, 2013 $5.9, 2014 $3.4 and thereafter $38.0.
There are renewal options in various operating leases subject to certain terms and conditions.
Environmental Contingencies. The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to a number of
environmental laws, fines or penalties assessed for alleged breaches of the environmental laws, and
to claims based upon such laws.
The Company has established procedures for regularly evaluating environmental loss
contingencies, including those arising from environmental reviews and investigations and any other
environmental remediation or compliance matters. The Companys environmental accruals represent the
Companys undiscounted estimate of costs reasonably expected to be incurred based on presently
enacted laws and regulations, existing requirements, currently available facts, existing
technology, and the Companys assessment of the likely remediation actions to be taken.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company increased its environmental accruals in
connection with the Companys submission of a draft feasibility study to the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Washington State Ecology) on September 8, 2010 (the Feasibility Study).
The draft Feasibility Study included recommendations for a range of remediation alternatives to
primarily address the historical use of oils containing polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, at the
Companys Trentwood facility in Spokane, Washington, which may be implemented over the next 30
years. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company continued to work with Washington State
Ecology to revise the draft Feasibility Study and to determine viable remedial approaches. As of
March 31, 2011, no agreement with the Washington State Ecology has been reached on the final
remediation approach. The draft Feasibility Study is still subject to further reviews, public
comment and regulatory approvals before the final decree is issued. The Company expects the consent
decree to be issued in 2012.
Based on the recommended remediation alternatives in the draft Feasibility Study and other
existing historical environmental matters at the Trentwood facility and certain other locations
owned or operated by the Company, the Companys environmental accrual was $20.0 at March 31, 2011.
The Companys environmental accrual represents the low end of the range of incremental cost
estimates based on proposed alternatives in the draft Feasibility Study, investigational studies
and other remediation activities occurring at certain locations owned or operated by the Company.
The Company expects that these remediation actions will be taken over the next 30 years and
estimates that the incremental direct costs attributable to the remediation activities to be
charged to these environmental accruals will be approximately $0.8 in 2011, $0.8 in 2012, $2.7 in
2013, $0.7 in 2014, and $15.0 in 2015 and years thereafter through the balance of the 30-year
period.
As additional facts are developed, feasibility studies at various facilities are completed,
draft remediation plans are modified, necessary regulatory approval for the implementation of
remediation are obtained, alternative technologies are developed, and/or other factors change,
there may be revisions to managements estimates, and actual costs may exceed the current
environmental accruals. The Company believes at this time that it is reasonably possible that
undiscounted costs associated with these environmental matters may exceed current accruals by
amounts that could be, in the aggregate, up to an estimated $22.0 over the next 30 years. It is
reasonably possible that the Companys recorded estimate of its obligation may change in the next
12 months.
Other Contingencies. The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various lawsuits, claims,
investigations, and administrative proceedings that arise in connection with past and current
operations. The Company evaluates such matters on a case-by-case basis, and its policy is to
vigorously contest any such claims it believes are without merit. The Company accrues for a legal
liability when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. Quarterly, in addition to when changes in facts and circumstances
require it, the Company reviews and adjusts these accruals to reflect the impacts of negotiations,
settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information, and events pertaining to a
particular case. While uncertainties are inherent in the final outcome of such matters and it is
presently impossible to determine the actual cost that may ultimately be incurred, management
believes that it has sufficiently reserved for such matters and that the ultimate resolution of
pending matters will not have a material adverse impact on its consolidated financial position,
operating results, or liquidity.
22
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
11. Derivative Financial Instruments and Related Hedging Programs
Overview. In conducting its business, the Company, from time to time, enters into derivative
transactions, including forward contracts and options, to limit its economic (i.e., cash) exposure
resulting from (i) metal price risk related to its sale of fabricated aluminum products and the
purchase of metal used as raw material for its fabrication operations, (ii) energy price risk
relating to fluctuating prices of natural gas and electricity used in its production processes, and
(iii) foreign currency requirements with respect to its cash commitments for equipment purchases
and with respect to its foreign subsidiaries, investment and cash commitments for equipment
purchases. In March 2010, in connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company purchased
cash-settled Call Options relating to the Companys common stock to limit its exposure to the cash
conversion feature of the Notes (Note 3). The Company may modify the terms of its derivative
contracts based on operational needs or financing objectives. As the Companys operational hedging
activities are generally designed to lock in a specified price or range of prices, realized gains
or losses on the derivative contracts utilized in the hedging activities generally offset at least
a portion of any losses or gains, respectively, on the transactions being hedged at the time the
transactions occur. However, due to mark-to-market accounting, during the term of the derivative
contracts, significant unrealized, non-cash gains and losses may be recorded in the income
statement.
Hedges of Operational Risks. The Companys pricing of fabricated aluminum products is
generally intended to lock in a conversion margin (representing the value added from the
fabrication process(es)) and to pass metal price risk to its customers. However, in certain
instances the Company enters into firm price arrangements with its customers and incurs price risk
on its anticipated primary aluminum purchases in respect of such customer orders. The Hedging
business unit uses third-party hedging instruments to limit exposure to metal-price risks related
to firm price customer sales contracts (see Note 12 for additional information regarding the
Companys material derivative positions relating to hedges of operational risks, and their
respective fair values).
During the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, total fabricated products
shipments that contained fixed price terms were (in millions of pounds) 24.6 and 22.4,
respectively. At March 31, 2011, the Fabricated Products segment held contracts for the delivery of
fabricated aluminum products that have the effect of creating price risk on anticipated purchases
of primary aluminum for the remainder of 2011, 2012 and 2013 and thereafter, totaling approximately
(in millions of pounds): 81.1, 14.7 and 0.4, respectively.
A majority of the Companys derivative contracts relating to hedges of operational risks
contain credit-risk related contingencies, which the Company tries to minimize or offset through
the management of counterparty credit lines, the utilization of options as part of the hedging
activities, or both. The Company regularly reviews the creditworthiness of its derivative
counterparties and does not expect to incur a significant loss from the failure of any
counterparties to perform under any agreements.
Hedges Relating to the Notes. As described in Note 1 and Note 3, the Company issued Notes in
the aggregate principal amount of $175.0 in March 2010. The conversion feature of the Notes can
only be settled in cash and was required to be bifurcated from the Notes and treated as a separate
derivative instrument. In order to offset the cash flow risk associated with the Bifurcated
Conversion Feature, the Company purchased Call Options, which are accounted for as derivative
instruments. The Company expects the gain or loss from the Call Options to substantially offset the
loss or gain associated with changes to the valuation of the Bifurcated Conversion Feature.
Accordingly, over time the Company does not expect there to be a material net impact to the
Consolidated Statement of Income associated with the Bifurcated Conversion Feature and the Call
Options (see Note 12 for additional information regarding the fair values of the Bifurcated
Conversion Feature and the Call Options).
The following table summarizes the Companys material derivative positions at March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Commodity |
|
Period |
|
|
(mmlbs) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Aluminum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call option purchase contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
Call option sales contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
(9.2 |
) |
Put option purchase contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Put option sales contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fixed priced purchase contracts |
|
4/11 through 11/13 |
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
Fixed priced sales contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
(3.4 |
) |
Midwest premium swap contracts1 |
|
4/11 through 12/12 |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
23
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Energy |
|
Period |
|
|
(mmbtu) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Natural gas 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call option purchase contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/13 |
|
|
6,120,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Call option sales contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
2,070,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Put option purchase contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
2,070,000 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
Put option sales contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/13 |
|
|
6,120,000 |
|
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
Fixed priced purchase contracts |
|
4/11 through 12/11 |
|
|
2,550,000 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
Period |
|
|
(Mwh) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed priced purchase contracts |
|
1/12 through 12/12 |
|
|
87,840 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Contracts |
|
|
|
|
Hedges Relating to the Notes |
|
Period |
|
|
(Common Shares) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Bifurcated Conversion Feature3 |
|
3/10 through 3/15 |
|
|
3,621,608 |
|
|
$ |
(56.3 |
) |
Call Options3 |
|
3/10 through 3/15 |
|
|
3,621,608 |
|
|
$ |
46.4 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Regional premiums represent the premium over the London Metal Exchange price for
primary aluminum which is incurred on the Companys purchases of primary aluminum. |
|
2 |
|
As of March 31, 2011, the Companys exposure to fluctuations in natural gas prices had
been substantially reduced for approximately 94%, 74% and 22% of the expected natural gas
purchases for the remainder of 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. |
|
3 |
|
The Bifurcated Conversion Feature represents the cash conversion feature of the Notes.
To hedge against the potential cash outflows associated with the Bifurcated Conversion
Feature, the Company purchased cash-settled Call Options. The Call Options have an exercise
price equal to the conversion price of the Notes, subject to anti-dilution adjustments
substantially similar to the anti-dilution adjustments for the Notes. The Call Options will
expire upon the maturity of the Notes. Although the fair value of the Call Options is derived
from a notional number of shares of the Companys common stock, the Call Options may only be
settled in cash. |
The Company reflects the fair value of its derivative contracts on a gross basis in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Note 2).
Realized and Unrealized Gain and Losses. The realized and unrealized gains (losses) associated with all derivative contracts for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Realized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
Natural Gas |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized gains (losses): |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Call Options relating to the Notes |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash conversion feature of the Notes |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized gains |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
12. Fair Value Measurements
Overview. The Company applies the fair value hierarchy established by US GAAP for the
recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities. An asset or liabilitys fair value
classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes
valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs to the extent possible, and considers counterparty risk in its assessment of
fair value.
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis. The
Company has elected not to carry any financial assets and liabilities at fair value, other than as
required by US GAAP. Financial assets and liabilities that the Company carries at fair value, as
required by US GAAP include: (i) its derivative instruments, (ii) the plan assets of the VEBAs and
the Companys Canadian defined benefit pension plan, and (iii) available for sale securities,
consisting of investments related to the Companys deferred compensation plan (see Note 8).
The majority of the Companys non-financial assets and liabilities, which include goodwill,
intangible assets, inventories and property, plant, and equipment are not required to be carried at
fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur (or as tested at
least annually for goodwill), an evaluation of a non-financial asset or liability may be required,
potentially resulting in an adjustment to the carrying amount of such asset or liability. For the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the Company concluded that none of its
non-financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value assessments on a non-recurring basis
required a material adjustment to the carrying amount of such assets and liabilities.
Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities. The Companys derivative contracts are valued
at fair value using significant observable and unobservable inputs.
Commodity, Foreign Currency and Energy Hedges The fair values of a majority of these
derivative contracts are based upon trades in liquid markets. Valuation model inputs can generally
be verified, and valuation techniques do not involve significant judgment. The Company has some
derivative contracts, however, that do not have observable market quotes. For these financial
instruments, management uses significant other observable inputs (i.e., information concerning
regional premiums for swaps). Where appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors, such
as bid/offer spreads.
Bifurcated Conversion Feature and Call Options The fair value of the Bifurcated Conversion
Feature is measured as the difference in the estimated fair value of the Notes and the estimated
fair value of the Notes without the cash conversion feature. The Notes were valued based on the
trading price of the Notes on March 31, 2011 (see Other below). The fair value of the Notes without
the cash conversion feature is the present value of the series of fixed income cash flows under the
Notes, with a mandatory redemption in 2015.
The Call Options are valued using a binomial lattice valuation model. Significant inputs to
the model are the Companys stock price, risk-free interest rate, credit spread, dividend yield,
expected volatility of the Companys stock price, and probability of certain corporate events, all
of which are observable inputs by market participants.
The significant assumptions used in the determining the fair value of the Call Option at March
31, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price at March 31, 20111 |
|
$ |
49.25 |
|
Quarterly dividend yield (per share)2 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Risk-free interest rate3 |
|
|
1.77 |
% |
Credit spread (basis points)4 |
|
|
419 |
|
Expected volatility rate5 |
|
|
29 |
% |
25
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
1 |
|
The Companys stock price has the most material impact to the fair values of the Call
Options and the Notes, which drives the fair value of the Bifurcated Conversion Feature. |
|
2 |
|
The Company used a discrete quarterly dividend payment of $0.24 per share based on
historical and expected future quarterly dividend payments. |
|
3 |
|
The risk-free rate was based on the five-year and three-year Constant Maturity
Treasury rate on March 31, 2011, compounded semi-annually. |
|
4 |
|
The Companys credit rating was estimated to be between BB and B+ based on comparisons
of its financial ratios and size to those of other rated companies. Using the Merrill Lynch
High Yield index, the Company identified credit spreads for other debt issuances with similar
credit ratings and used the median of such credit spreads. |
|
5 |
|
The volatility rate was based on both observed volatility, which is based on the
Companys historical stock price, and implied volatility from the Companys traded options.
Such volatility was further adjusted to take into consideration market participant risk
tolerance. |
The following table presents the Companys derivative assets and liabilities, classified under
the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy, as of March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
Aluminum option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Natural gas swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Natural gas option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Call Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
Midwest premium swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
79.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
Aluminum option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Natural gas swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Natural gas option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Bifurcated Conversion Feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(72.9 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(72.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis classified
under the appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Derivative assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
Aluminum option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Natural gas swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Natural gas option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Call Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
Midwest premium swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
78.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
79.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
Aluminum option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Natural gas swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Natural gas option contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Bifurcated Conversion Feature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60.0 |
) |
Midwest premium swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(78.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(78.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
Financial instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy represent derivative contracts in which management has used at least one
significant unobservable input in the valuation model. The following table presents a reconciliation of activity for such derivative contracts
on a net basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Balance at January 1, 2011: |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Total realized/unrealized losses included in: |
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold excluding depreciation expense |
|
|
0.6 |
|
Transactions involving Level 3 derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
0.1 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
Issuances |
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transactions involving Level 3 derivatives net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Transfers in and (or) out of Level 3 valuation hierarchy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses relating to derivative contracts held at March 31,
2011: |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
VEBA and Canadian pension plan assets. The VEBA assets are managed by various investment
advisors selected by the trustees of each of the VEBAs. The plan assets are outside of the
Companys control, and the Company does not have insight into the investment strategies.
The assets of the Companys Canadian pension plan are managed by advisors selected by the
Company, with the investment portfolio subject to periodic review and evaluation by the Companys
investment committee. The investment of assets in the Canadian pension plan is based upon the
objective of maintaining a diversified portfolio of investments in order to minimize concentration
of credit and market risks (such as interest rate, currency, equity price and liquidity risks). The
degree of risk and risk tolerance take into account the obligation structure of the plan, the
anticipated demand for funds and the maturity profiles required from the investment portfolio in
light of these demands.
The fair value of the plan assets of the VEBAs and the Companys Canadian defined benefit
pension plan are reflected in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. In
determining the fair value of plan assets each period, the Company utilizes primarily the results
of valuations supplied by the investment advisors responsible for managing the assets of each plan.
Certain assets are valued based upon unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets (e.g., liquid securities
listed on an exchange). Such assets are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation of other invested assets is based on significant observable inputs (e.g., net asset
values of registered investment companies, valuations derived from actual market transactions,
broker-dealer supplied valuations, or correlations between a given U.S. market and a non-U.S.
security). Valuation model inputs can generally be verified and valuation techniques do not involve
significant judgment. The fair values of such financial instruments are classified within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy. The Companys Canadian pension plan assets and the plan assets of the
VEBAs are measured annually on December 31. See Note 11 of Notes to
27
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December31, 2010 for additional information regarding fair value of plan assets.
Available for sale assets. The Company holds assets in various investment funds at certain
registered investment companies in connection with its deferred compensation program (see Note 1
and Note 8). Such assets are accounted for as available for sale assets and are measured and
recorded at fair value based on the net asset value of the investment funds on a recurring basis.
Such fair value input is considered a Level 2 input. At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
amortized costs of the Companys available for sale assets were $4.7 and $4.6, respectively.
Other. The Company believes that the fair value of its cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and income tax receivables / payables approximate
their respective carrying values due to their short maturities and nominal credit risk. Further,
the trading price of the Notes is considered a Level 1 input in the fair value hierarchy. The fair
value of the Notes were $216.7 and $214.7 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The Company believes that the fair value of its LA Promissory Note and Nichols Promissory Note
each materially approximate their respective carrying amounts in light of the Companys credit
profile, the interest rate applicable to each note, and the remaining duration of each instrument.
Each of the foregoing fair value assessments is considered to be a Level 2 valuation within the
fair value hierarchy.
Fair Values of Non-financial Assets and Liabilities.
Idled Assets. Included within Property, plant and equipment net as of both March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 were $5.5 of idled assets. Of the carrying amount of idled assets as of March
31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, $1.1 represented equipment used by the Companys Tulsa, Oklahoma
facility prior to the closure of that facility in 2008, and $4.4 represented assets that were
acquired by the Company but had not yet been placed into service. The value of such assets was
estimated in the fourth quarter of 2010 using a combination of the cost approach and market
approach. The cost approach uses replacement cost and the market approach uses prices for similar
assets to determine the value of assets, and both approaches use Level 3 fair value inputs. See
Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional information relating to idled assets.
CAROs. The inputs in estimating the fair value of CAROs include: (i) the timing of when any
such CARO may be incurred, (ii) incremental costs associated with special handling or treatment of
CARO materials and (iii) credit adjusted risk free rate, all of which are considered Level 3 inputs
as they involve significant judgment of the Company. There were no material adjustments to the
estimated fair values of CAROs for either the quarters ended March 31, 2011 or March 31, 2010. The
estimated fair value of CARO liabilities at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $3.9 and $3.8,
respectively, based upon the application of a weighted average credit-adjusted risk free rate of
9.1%. CAROs are included in Other accrued liabilities or Long-term liabilities, as appropriate
(see Note 2).
13. Earnings Per Share
Unvested stock-based
payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable
rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents
(whether paid or unpaid)
represent participating
securities and are
included in the
computation of earnings
per share pursuant to the
two-class method.
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
Less: net income attributable to participating securities1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding Basic |
|
|
18,949,549 |
|
|
|
20,020,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares Diluted |
|
|
18,949,549 |
|
|
|
20,020,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
28
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
The following table provides a detail of net income attributable to participating securities for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income attributable to participating securities:1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed income |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Undistributed income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income attributable to participating securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of undistributed net income apportioned to participating securities |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net income attributable to participating securities for a given period includes both
distributed and undistributed net income, as applicable. Distributed net income attributed to
participating securities consists of dividend and dividend equivalents declared on the
participating securities that the Company expects to ultimately vest. Undistributed net income
for a given period, if any, is apportioned to participating securities based on the
weighted-average number of each class of securities outstanding during the applicable period
as a percentage of the combined weighted-average number of these securities outstanding during
the period. Undistributed losses are not allocated to participating securities, however, as
holders of such securities do not have an obligation to fund net losses of the Company. |
In computing the diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding for the quarters ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the Company used the two-class method assuming that
participating securities are not exercised, vested or converted. The Company included the dilutive
effect of stock options in calculating the diluted weighted-average common shares. Options to
purchase 22,077 common shares at an average exercise price of $80.01 per share were outstanding at
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010. The potential dilutive effect of such shares was zero for each
of the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010. Warrants relating to approximately 3.6
million common shares at an average exercise price of approximately $61.36 per share were issued in
March 2010 and outstanding at March 31, 2011. The potential dilutive effect of shares underlying
the Warrants was zero for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
During quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the Company paid approximately $4.7
($0.24 per common share) and $4.9 ($0.24 per common share), respectively, in cash dividends to
stockholders, including the holders of restricted stock, and dividend equivalents to the holders of
restricted stock units and to the holders of performance shares with respect to approximately one
half of the performance shares.
In June 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $75 of the
Companys common shares, with repurchase transactions to occur in open market and privately
negotiated transactions at such times and prices as deemed appropriate by management and to be
funded with the Companys excess liquidity after giving consideration to internal and external
growth opportunities and cash flows. The Company repurchased 572,706 shares of common stock at a
weighted-average price of $49.05 per share during the third quarter of 2008 for a total cost of
$28.1, leaving $46.9 available for repurchase.
During the first quarter of 2010, pursuant to a separate authorization from the Companys
Board of Directors, the Company repurchased $44.2, or 1,151,900 shares of our outstanding common
stock, in privately negotiated, off-market transactions with purchasers of the Notes.
29
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
14. Segment and Geographical Area Information
The Companys primary line of business is the production of semi-fabricated specialty aluminum
products. In addition, the Company also owns a 49% interest in Anglesey, which owns and operates a
secondary aluminum remelt and casting facility in Holyhead, Wales.
Each of the Companys production facilities is an operating segment. Such operating segments
were aggregated for reporting purposes to one reportable segment, Fabricated Products. The
Fabricated Products segment sells value-added products such as aluminum sheet and plate, extruded
and drawn products which are primarily used in aerospace / high strength, general engineering,
automotive, and other industrial end market segment applications.
The Companys operations consist of the Fabricated Products segment and three business units,
Secondary Aluminum, Hedging, and Corporate and Other. The Secondary Aluminum business unit sells
value-added products such as ingot and billet, produced from Anglesey, for which the Company
receives a portion of a premium over normal commodity market prices. The Hedging business unit
conducts hedging activities with respect to the Companys exposure to primary aluminum prices. The
Corporate and Other business unit provides general and administrative support for the Companys
operations. For purposes of segment reporting under US GAAP, the Company treats the Fabricated
Products segment as a reportable segment and combines the three other business units, Secondary
Aluminum, Hedging and the Corporate and Other into one category, which is referred to as All Other.
All Other is not considered a reportable segment.
The Company periodically reassesses the methodologies used to allocate costs among the
Companys business units to assess segment profitability. In 2010, the Company modified the
allocation of incentive compensation expense relating to its LTI programs and certain short-term
incentive plans among its business units. These reclassifications have no impact on the Companys
segment or consolidated Net sales, or its consolidated operating income. All prior period results
have been retrospectively adjusted for consistency with the cost allocation in 2010. As a result,
an additional $0.9 of charges relating to the Companys LTI programs and certain short-term
incentive plans are reflected in the operating results of the Fabricated Products segment for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010.
The accounting policies of the Fabricated Products segment are the same as those described in
Note 1. Segment results are evaluated internally by management before any allocation of corporate
overhead and without any charge for income taxes, interest expense, or Other operating charges,
net.
Financial information by operating segment for the March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
267.2 |
|
All Other1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
267.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net sales in All Other represents residual activity involving primary aluminum
purchased by the Company from Anglesey while it continued its smelting operations, prior to September 30, 2009, and resold by the Company in the first quarter of
2010. In connection with Angleseys new remelt operation beginning in the fourth
quarter of 2009, the Company changed its basis of revenue recognition from gross
to net basis (see Note 1). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Segment Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products 1, 2 |
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
All Other2 |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
$ |
20.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
1 |
|
Operating results in the Fabricated Products segment for quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 included LIFO inventory charges of $14.9 and $9.2, respectively, and environmental expenses of $0.2 and $0.4, respectively. |
|
2 |
|
Operating results of the Fabricated Products segment and All Other include gains
(losses) on intercompany hedging activities related to metal. These amounts
eliminate in consolidation. Internal hedging gains (losses) related to metal in
the Fabricated Products segment were $4.3 and $(0.6) for March 31, 2011 and March
31, 2010, respectively. Conversely, All Other included such amounts as (losses)
gains for the March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Depreciation and Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
607.0 |
|
|
$ |
496.7 |
|
All Other1 |
|
|
763.8 |
|
|
|
845.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,370.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,342.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Assets in All Other primarily represents all of the Companys cash and cash
equivalents, derivative assets, net assets in respect of VEBA and net deferred
income tax assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Income Taxes Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes paid |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Restructuring and Other Exit Activities
In 2008, the Company announced plans to close its Tulsa, Oklahoma facility and curtail
operations at its Bellwood, Virginia facility due to deteriorating economic and market conditions.
Both facilities produced extruded rod and bar products sold principally to service centers for
general engineering applications. In 2009, the Company announced plans to further curtail
operations at its Bellwood, Virginia facility to focus solely on drive shaft and seamless tube
products, and to also reduce its personnel in certain other
locations to streamline costs. The restructuring efforts initiated in both 2008 and 2009 were
substantially completed by the end of 2009.
31
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions of dollars, except share and per share amounts and as otherwise indicated)
In connection with the above restructuring efforts, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the
Company incurred and recorded in its Fabricated Products segment $0.6 of restructuring benefit
relating to revisions of previously estimated employee termination costs. Restructuring expense
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was immaterial.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to cash obligations arising from the
Companys restructuring plans during the quarter ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Personnel |
|
|
Facility related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs |
|
|
costs |
|
|
Total |
|
Restructuring obligations at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Cash payments in 2011 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring obligations at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash capital expenditures |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. Other Income, Net
Amounts included in Other income in March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unrealized loss on financial derivatives1 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
All other, net |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
See Derivative Financial Instruments in Note 1 for a discussion of accounting policy for such instruments. |
18. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events subsequent to March 31, 2011, to assess the need for
potential recognition or disclosure in this Report. Such events were evaluated through the date
these financial statements were issued. Based upon this evaluation, it was determined that no
subsequent events occurred that require recognition in the financial statements and that the
following items represent subsequent events that merit disclosure herein:
Dividend Declaration. On April 7, 2011, the Company announced that its Board of Directors
approved the declaration of a quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share on the Companys
outstanding common stock to be paid on May 13, 2011 to stockholders of record at the close of
business on April 25, 2011.
Union VEBA Shares. Subsequent to March 31, 2011 through April 21, 2011, the Union VEBA sold
333,320 shares of the Companys common stock in the open market.
32
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Item should be read in conjunction with Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this
Report.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements which constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements appear in a number of places in this Report and can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects, may, estimates, will, should,
plans, or anticipates or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Readers are
cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and
involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from those
in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These factors include: the
effectiveness of managements strategies and decisions; general economic and business conditions
including cyclicality and other conditions in the aerospace, automobile and other end market
segments we serve; developments in technology; new or modified statutory or regulatory
requirements; and changing prices and market conditions. Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 identifies other factors
that could cause actual results to vary. No assurance can be given that these are all of the
factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statements.
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A)
is designed to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective
of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and certain other
factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A is presented in the following sections:
|
|
|
|
Overview; |
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations; |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources; |
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations, Commercial Commitments, and Off-Balance-Sheet and Other
Arrangements; |
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies; |
|
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements; and |
|
|
|
|
Available Information. |
We believe our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and related Notes included in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
In the discussion of operating results below, certain items are referred to as non-run-rate
items. For purposes of such discussion, non-run-rate items are items that, while they may recur
from period-to-period, (i) are particularly material to results, (ii) affect costs primarily as a
result of external market factors, and (iii) may not recur in future periods if the same level of
underlying performance were to occur. Non-run-rate items are part of our business and operating
environment but are worthy of being highlighted for the benefit of the users of the financial
statements. Our intent is to allow users of the financial statements to consider our results both
in light of and separately from items such as fluctuations in underlying metal prices, energy
prices, and currency exchange rates.
Overview
We are a leading North American manufacturer of semi-fabricated specialty aluminum products
for aerospace / high strength, general engineering, automotive, and other industrial applications.
We also own a 49% interest in Anglesey Aluminium Limited (Anglesey), which owns and operates a
secondary aluminum remelt and casting facility in Holyhead, Wales.
At March 31, 2011, we operated eleven focused production facilities in the United States
(reflecting the acquisition effective January 1, 2011 of the manufacturing facility and related
assets of Alexco, L.L.C. (Alexco) in Chandler, Arizona (the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion)
facility)) and one facility in Canada that produce rolled, extruded, and drawn aluminum products
used principally for aerospace and defense, automotive, consumer durables, electronics, electrical,
and machinery and equipment end market segment applications. Through these facilities, which
comprise our Fabricated Products segment, we produced and shipped approximately 144.1 million
pounds of semi-fabricated aluminum products which comprised effectively all of our total
consolidated net sales of approximately $322.6 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.
33
We have long-standing relationships with our customers, which consist primarily of blue-chip
companies including leading aerospace companies, automotive suppliers and metal distributors.
In our served markets, we believe that we are the supplier of choice to many of our customers,
providing Best in Class customer satisfaction and offering a broad product portfolio. We have a
culture of continuous improvement that is facilitated by the Kaiser Production System (KPS), an
integrated application of the tools of Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma and Total Productive
Manufacturing. We believe KPS enables us to continuously reduce our own manufacturing costs,
eliminate waste throughout the value chain, and deliver Best in Class customer service through
consistent, on-time delivery of superior quality products on short lead times. We strive to tightly
integrate the management of our operations across multiple production facilities, product lines and
our served markets to maximize the efficiency of product flow to our customers.
A fundamental part of our
business model is to mitigate the impact of aluminum price
volatility on our cash flow. We manage the risk of fluctuations in the price of primary aluminum
through either (i) pricing policies that generally allow us to pass the underlying cost of metal
onto customers, or (ii) hedging by purchasing financial derivatives to shield us from exposure
related to firm price sales contracts that specify the underlying metal price plus a conversion
price. While we can generally pass metal price movement onto customers, for some of our higher value added products
sold on a spot basis, our ability to change prices can lag, sometimes by as much as several months, with a favorable
impact to us when metal prices decline and an adverse impact to us when metal prices increase. Primary aluminum prices
increased during the first quarter of
2011, during which we were unable to pass all aluminum cost increases onto customers for some of our higher value
added products sold on a spot basis. The average London Metal Exchange (LME) transaction price per pound
of primary aluminum for
the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 were $1.13 and $0.98, respectively. At April
21, 2011, the LME transaction price per pound was $1.24.
Our highly engineered products are manufactured to meet demanding requirements of aerospace
and defense, general engineering, automotive and other industrial applications. We have focused our
business on select end market segment applications where we believe we have sustainable competitive
advantages and opportunities for long-term profitable growth. We believe that we differentiate
ourselves with a broad product offering, Best in Class customer satisfaction and the ability to
provide superior products through our Kaiser Select® product line. Our Kaiser Select® products are
manufactured to deliver enhanced product characteristics with improved consistency which results in
better performance, lower waste, and, in many cases, lower cost for our customers.
In the commercial aerospace sector, we believe that global economic growth and development
will continue to drive growth in airline passenger miles. In addition, trends such as longer routes
and larger payloads, and a focus on fuel efficiency have increased the demand for new and larger
aircraft. We believe that the long-term demand drivers, including growing build rates, larger
airframes and increased use of monolithic design throughout the industry will continue to increase
demand for our high strength aerospace plate. Monolithic design and construction utilize aluminum
plate that is heavily machined to form the desired part from a single piece of metal as opposed to
using aluminum sheet, extrusions or forgings that are affixed to one another using rivets, bolts or
welds.
Our products are also sold into defense end market segments. Ongoing deliveries of existing
defense aircraft platforms and armor requirements for ground vehicles used in active military
engagements continue to drive demand for our products. Longer term, we expect the production of the
F-35, or Joint Strike Fighter, to also drive demand for our high strength products.
Commercial aerospace and defense applications have demanding customer requirements for quality
and consistency. As a result, there are a very limited number of suppliers worldwide who are
qualified to serve these market segments. We believe barriers to entry include significant capital
requirements, technological expertise and a rigorous qualification process for safety-critical
applications.
Our general engineering products serve the North American industrial market segments, and
demand for these products generally tracks the broader economic environment. We expect a gradual
recovery in demand throughout the supply chain as the economy continues to improve.
We expect the 2011 North American automotive sector build rates to increase approximately 14%
over 2010. Our automotive products typically have specific performance attributes in terms of
machinability and mechanical properties and are used for specific applications across a broad mix
of North American original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and automotive platforms. We believe
that these attributes are not easily replicated by our competitors and are important to our
customers, who are typically first tier automotive suppliers. Additionally, we believe that in
North America, from 2001 to 2008, the aluminum extrusion content per vehicle grew at a compound
annual growth rate of 5%, as automotive OEMs and their suppliers converted applications to aluminum
to decrease weight without sacrificing structural integrity and safety performance. We also believe
the United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations, which increase fuel
efficiency standards on an annual basis, will continue to drive growth in demand for aluminum
extruded components in passenger vehicles as a replacement for the heavier weight of steel
components.
Highlights of the quarter ended March 31, 2011 include:
|
|
|
Fabricated Products segment shipments of 144.1 million pounds, a 13% increase from the
first quarter of 2010, resulting primarily from stronger demand across all end use
applications; |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net income of $11.3 million and earnings per diluted share of $0.59,
including pre-tax, non-cash mark-to-market gains on derivative positions of approximately
$4.3 million;
|
34
|
|
|
Completion of the strategic acquisition from Alexco of the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion)
facility, which manufactures hard alloy extrusions for the aerospace industry. Cash
consideration for the acquisition was approximately $83.2 million (which was net of $4.9
million cash received in the acquisition); |
|
|
|
|
Continued ramp-up of the new world class rod and bar extrusion facility in Kalamazoo,
Michigan; |
|
|
|
|
Combined cash balances and borrowing availability under our revolving credit facility of
approximately $246 million, with no borrowings under that facility as of March 31, 2011; and |
|
|
|
|
Declaration and payment of a regular dividend of $4.7 million, or $0.24 per common share,
on February 15, 2011 to stockholders of record as of January 24, 2011. |
Results of Operations
Consolidated Selected Operational and Financial Information
The table below provides selected operational and financial information on a consolidated
basis (in millions of dollars, except shipments and prices) for the quarters ended March 31, 2011
and March 31, 2010. See Segment and Business Unit Information below for information regarding
our reportable segment Fabricated Products and our other business units, which are
aggregated and referred to herein as All Other.
The following data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements
and the notes thereto contained elsewhere herein. See Note 14 of Notes to Interim Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Report for further
information regarding segments. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of those for a full
year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions of dollars, except shipments |
|
|
|
and average sales price) |
|
Shipments (mm lbs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
|
144.1 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
All Other1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.1 |
|
|
|
128.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Realized Third-Party Sales Price (per
pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products2 |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
All Other3 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
267.2 |
|
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
267.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income (Loss):4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products5 6 |
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
All Other7 |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Income |
|
$ |
20.5 |
|
|
$ |
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
$ |
(6.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
1 |
|
Shipments in All Other in 2010 represent residual activity involving primary aluminum
purchased by us from Anglesey while it continued its smelting operations (prior to September
30, 2009) and resold by us in the first quarter of 2010. |
|
2 |
|
Average realized prices for our Fabricated Products segment are subject to
fluctuations due to changes in product mix as well as underlying primary aluminum prices and
are not necessarily indicative of changes in underlying profitability. |
|
3 |
|
Average realized prices for All Other represent the average realized prices on sales
of primary aluminum purchased by us from Anglesey while it continued its smelting operations
(prior to September 30, 2009) and resold by us in the first quarter of 2010. |
|
4 |
|
We periodically reassess the methodologies used to allocate costs among our business
units to assess segment profitability. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we modified the
allocation of incentive compensation expense relating to both our long-term incentive plans
and certain short-term incentive plans to our business units. These reclassifications have no
impact on our segment or consolidated Net sales, or our consolidated operating income. All
interim period results of 2010 have been retrospectively adjusted for consistency with such
cost allocation. As a result, an additional $0.9 million of charges relating to our long-term
incentive plans and certain short-term employee incentive plans are reflected in the operating
results of the Fabricated Products segment and, accordingly, excluded from the operating
results of All Other in the quarter ended March 31, 2010. |
|
5 |
|
Fabricated Products segment results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 include
non-cash mark-to-market gains on natural gas, electricity and foreign currency hedging
activities totaling $1.2 million. Fabricated Products segment results for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 include non-cash mark-to-market losses on natural gas and foreign currency
hedging activities of $(3.2) million. For further discussion regarding mark-to-market matters,
see Note 11 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1.
Financial Statements of this Report. |
|
6 |
|
Fabricated Products segment operating results for the quarters ended March 31, 2011
and March 31, 2010 include non-cash last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory charges of $14.9
million and $9.2 million, respectively, and metal gains of approximately $12.4 million and
$8.2 million, respectively. |
|
7 |
|
The changes in operating income in All Other were driven by
the Corporate and Other and the Hedging business unit operating
results. Included in the operating results of Corporate and Other
were $2.2 million and $(0.4) million of net periodic pension benefit
income (expense) relating to the VEBAs for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. In addition, for
the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010,
non-cash mark-to-market gains on primary aluminum hedging activities were $3.1 million and
$3.4 million, respectively. For further discussion regarding mark-to-market matters, see Note
11 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1.
Financial Statements of this Report. |
Summary. We reported net income of $11.3 million and $8.8 million for the quarters ended March
31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Both periods include a number of non-run-rate items that
are more fully explained below.
Net Sales. We reported Net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of $322.6 million
compared to $267.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. As more fully discussed below, the
increase in Net sales during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was primarily due to an increase in
Fabricated Products segment shipments in all end-use categories from the facilities we operated in
the first quarter of 2010, as well as shipments from the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility and
the manufacturing facility and related assets of Nichols Wire, Inc. in Florence, Alabama (the
Florence, Alabama facility) acquired thereafter. The average realized price per pound for the
Fabricated Products segment increased slightly in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the prior
year quarter as a result of higher underlying metal prices as well as slightly higher average
value-added revenue. Fluctuation in underlying primary aluminum market prices does not necessarily
directly impact profitability because (i) a substantial portion of the business conducted by the
Fabricated Products segment passes primary aluminum price changes directly onto customers and (ii)
our hedging activities in support of Fabricated Products segment firm price sales agreements limit
our losses as well as gains from primary metal price changes.
Cost of Products Sold Excluding Depreciation, Amortization and Other Items. Cost of products
sold, excluding depreciation, amortization and other items for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
totaled $280.9 million, or 87% of Net Sales, compared to $232.0 million, or 87% of Net sales, in
quarter ended March 31, 2010. Included in Cost of products sold, excluding depreciation,
amortization and other items were $4.3 million and $0.2 million unrealized mark-to-market gains on
our derivative positions for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively.
See Segment and Business Unit Information below for a detailed discussion of the comparative
results of operations for quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Restructuring Costs and Other Charges. We recorded an immaterial amount of restructuring
benefit in the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and $0.6 of restructuring benefit in the quarter ended
March 31, 2010. Such benefits consist primarily of revisions to
36
previously estimated employee termination costs and were incurred and recorded in the
Companys Fabricated Products segment. See Note 15 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Report for additional
information regarding our 2008 and 2009 restructuring activities.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization for the quarter ended March 31,
2011 was $6.3 million compared to $4.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Depreciation
expense increased primarily as the result of bringing on-line certain production equipment relating
to investment in our Kalamazoo, Michigan facility and the inclusion of $0.6 million of amortization
expense relating to intangible assets acquired in connection with the acquisitions of the Florence,
Alabama facility and the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility.
Selling, Administrative, Research and Development, and General. Selling, administrative,
research and development, and general expense totaled $14.9 million for the quarter ended March 31,
2011 compared to $17.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due
to lower employee compensation expense relating to our long-term incentive and other benefit
programs and lower periodic pension benefit expense with respect to certain voluntary employees
beneficiary associations for the benefit of certain retirees, their surviving spouses and eligible
dependents (the VEBAs).
Interest Expense. Interest expense of $4.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was
primarily related to cash and non-cash interest expense incurred on our cash convertible notes (the
Notes) and our revolving credit facility, net of $0.2 million of interest capitalization to
Construction in progress. Interest expense in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was zero as a result
of interest capitalization to Construction in progress.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net was $1.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011,
compared to $0.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The increase in Other income, net
for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was primarily related to a net unrealized mark-to-market gain
of $1.7 million on the derivative instruments relating to our Notes.
Income Tax Provision. The income tax provision for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was $6.4
million, or an effective tax rate of 36.3%. The difference between the effective tax rate and the
projected blended statutory tax rate was primarily the result of a decrease in the valuation
allowance due to a change in tax law in the State of Illinois of $0.8 million, resulting in a 4.6%
decrease in the effective tax rate, partially offset by (i) an increase in unrecognized tax
benefits, including interest and penalties, of $0.3 million resulting in a 1.7% increase in the
effective tax rate and (ii) the impact of a non-deductible compensation expense of $0.2 million,
resulting in a 1.3% increase in the effective tax rate.
The income tax provision for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $6.2 million, or an
effective tax rate of 41.4%. The difference between the effective tax rate and the projected
blended statutory tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was primarily the result of
unrecognized tax benefits, including interest and penalties, of $0.5 million, resulting in a 3.6%
increase in the effective tax rate from the 2010 projected statutory rate.
Derivatives
From time-to-time, we enter into derivative transactions, including forward contracts and
options, to limit our economic (i.e., cash) exposure resulting from (i) metal price risk related to
our sale of fabricated aluminum products and the purchase of metal used as raw material for our
fabrication operations, (ii) energy price risk relating to fluctuating prices of natural gas and
electricity used in our production processes, and (iii) foreign currency requirements with respect
to our foreign subsidiaries, investments, and cash commitments for equipment purchases. In March
2010, in connection with the issuance of the Notes, we purchased cash-settled call options (the
Call Options) relating to our common stock to limit our exposure to the cash conversion feature
of the Notes (see Note 3 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1,
Item 1. Financial Statements of this Report).
We may modify the terms of our derivative contracts based on operational needs or financing
objectives. As our hedging activities are generally designed to lock-in a specified price or range
of prices, realized gains or losses on the derivative contracts utilized in the hedging activities
generally offset at least a portion of any losses or gains, respectively, on the transactions being
hedged at the time the transactions occur. However, due to mark-to-market accounting, during the
term of the derivative contracts, significant unrealized, non-cash gains and losses may be recorded
in the income statement. We may also be exposed to margin calls placed on derivative contracts,
which we try to minimize or offset through the management of counterparty credit lines, the
utilization of options as part of our hedging activities, or both. We regularly review the
creditworthiness of our derivative counterparties and do not expect to incur a significant loss
from the failure of any counterparties to perform under any agreements.
The fair value of our derivatives recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31,
2011 and December 31, 2010 was $7.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The increase in the net
position was primarily due to increases in the underlying price of primary aluminum and natural
gas. The changes in market value of derivative contracts resulted in the recognition of a $4.3
million unrealized mark-to-market gain on derivatives, which we consider to be a non-run-rate item
(see Note 11 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1.
Financial Statements of this Report).
37
Fair Value Measurement
We apply the fair value hierarchy for the recognition and measurement of assets and
liabilities. An asset or liabilitys fair value classification within the hierarchy is determined
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In determining
fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize
the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as consider counterparty risk in our
assessment of fair value.
The fair values of financial assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis. We
have elected not to carry all financial assets and liabilities at fair value, other than as
required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP). Financial assets
and liabilities that we carry at fair value, as required by US GAAP include (i) our derivative
instruments, (ii) the plan assets of the VEBAs and our Canadian defined benefit pension plan, and
(iii) available for sale securities, consisting of the investments related to our deferred
compensation plan.
The majority of our non-financial assets and liabilities, which include goodwill, intangible
assets, inventories and property, plant, and equipment, are not required to be carried at fair
value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur (or as tested at least
annually for goodwill), an evaluation of a non-financial asset or liability may be required,
potentially resulting in an adjustment to the carrying amount of such asset or liability.
Below is a discussion of the fair value inputs to our material financial assets and
liabilities measured and carried at fair value:
Commodity, Energy, Electricity and Foreign Currency Hedges The fair values of a majority of
these derivative contracts are based upon trades in liquid markets. Valuation model inputs can
generally be verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant judgment. The fair values
of such financial instruments are generally classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
(see Note 1 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1. Item 1.
Financial Statements of this Report). We, however, have some derivative contracts that do not
have observable market quotes. For these financial instruments, we use significant other observable
inputs (i.e., information concerning regional premiums for swaps). Where appropriate, valuations
are adjusted for various factors, such as bid/offer spreads.
Cash Conversion Feature of the Notes and Call Options The value of the cash conversion
feature of the Notes is measured as the difference between the estimated fair value of the Notes
and the estimated fair value of the Notes without the cash conversion feature. The Notes were
valued based on the trading price of the Notes on March 31, 2011. The fair value of the Notes
without the cash conversion feature is the present value of the series of fixed income cash flows
under the Notes with a mandatory redemption in 2015. The Call Options are valued using a binomial
lattice valuation model. Significant inputs to the model include our stock price, risk-free rate,
credit spread, dividend yield, expected volatility of our stock price, and probability of certain
corporate events, all of which are observable inputs by market participants. The fluctuations in
the fair values of the Call Options and the Notes are primarily due to the changes in our stock
price. See Note 11 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1. Item
1. Financial Statements of this Report for significant assumptions used in these valuations.
Employee Benefit Plan Assets In determining the fair value of employee benefit plan assets,
we utilize primarily the results of valuations supplied by the investment advisors responsible for
managing the assets of each plan. Certain plan assets are valued based upon unadjusted quoted
market prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical,
unrestricted assets (e.g., liquid securities listed on an exchange). Such assets are classified
within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Valuation of other invested plan assets is based on
significant observable inputs (e.g., net asset values of registered investment companies,
valuations derived from actual market transactions, broker-dealer supplied valuations, or
correlations between a given U.S. market and a non-U.S. security). Valuation model inputs can
generally be verified and valuation techniques do not involve significant judgment. The fair values
of such financial instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Our
Canadian pension plan assets and the plan assets of the VEBAs are measured annually on December 31.
Segment and Business Unit Information
For the purposes of segment reporting under US GAAP, we have one reportable segment,
Fabricated Products. We also have three other business units which we combine into All Other. The
Fabricated Products segment which is made up of our production facilities, sells value-added
products such as heat treat sheet and plate and extruded rod, bar, wire, and tube products
primarily used in aerospace / high strength, general engineering, automotive and other industrial
end market segment applications, which we categorize herein as Aero/HS Products, GE Products,
Automotive Extrusions and Other Products. All Other consists of Secondary Aluminum, Hedging and
Corporate and Other business units. The Secondary Aluminum business unit sells value-added products
such as ingot and billet produced by Anglesey, and receives a portion of a premium over normal
commodity market prices. Our Hedging business unit conducts hedging activities in respect of our
exposure to primary aluminum prices. Our Corporate and Other business unit provides general and
administrative support for our operations. All Other is not considered a reportable segment. The
accounting policies of the segment and business units are the same as those described in Note 1 of
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements in Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements of
this Report. Segment results are evaluated internally before interest expense,
38
other expense (income) and income taxes.
Fabricated Products
The table below provides selected operational and financial information (in millions of
dollars except shipments and average realized sales price) for our Fabricated Products segment for
the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Shipments (mm lbs) |
|
|
144.1 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of average realized third-party sales price (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged cost of alloyed metal |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
Average realized third-party value-added revenue |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average realized third-party sales price |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
322.6 |
|
|
$ |
267.2 |
|
Segment Operating Income |
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
The table below provides shipment and value-added revenue information (in millions of dollars
except shipments and value-added revenue per pound) for our end market segment applications for the
quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 for our Fabricated Products segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Shipments (mm lbs): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aero/HS Products |
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
GE Products |
|
|
61.2 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
Automotive Extrusions |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Other Products |
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.1 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value-added revenue:1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aero/HS Products |
|
$ |
88.4 |
|
|
$ |
70.1 |
|
GE Products |
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
Automotive Extrusions |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Other Products |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
156.5 |
|
|
$ |
137.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value-added revenue per pound: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aero/HS Products |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
GE Products |
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
Automotive Extrusions |
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
Other Products |
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Value-added revenue represents net sales less hedged cost of alloyed metal. |
For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, Net sales of fabricated products increased by 21% to
$322.6 million, as compared to Net sales of fabricated products for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, due primarily to a 13% increase in shipments, reflecting improved economic conditions and
significantly stronger demand for Aero/HS Products and Automotive Extrusions as well as the
acquisitions
39
of the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility and the Florence, Alabama facility.
Shipments of Aero/HS Products were 22% higher in 2011, reflecting improved demand and incremental
shipments from the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) and Florence, Alabama facilities. Destocking of
aerospace plate products continued in the first quarter of 2011. Shipments of Automotive Extrusions
increased 29% over the prior year quarter as automotive build rates improved and we saw new
aluminum automotive extrusion programs using our products ramp up. Average realized third-party
sales price increased, primarily reflecting higher underlying hedged, alloyed metal prices passed
through to customers.
Operating income in the Fabricated Products segment for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
March 31, 2010 included several large non-run-rate items. These items are listed below (in millions
of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
22.1 |
|
Impact to operating income of non-run-rate items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metal gains (before considering LIFO) |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Non-cash LIFO charges |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
Mark-to-market gains (losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Restructuring benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Environmental expenses |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-run-rate items |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income excluding non-run-rate items |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
|
$ |
26.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As noted above, operating income excluding identified non-run-rate items for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 was $0.9 million lower than the operating income excluding identified non-run-rate
items for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Operating income excluding non-run-rate items for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 as compared to that of the quarter ended March 31, 2010 reflects the
following impacts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 vs. 2010 |
|
|
|
Favorable/(Unfavorable) |
|
Sales impact |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
Manufacturing inefficiency |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
Energy costs |
|
|
1.1 |
|
Planned major maintenance |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Segment operating results for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 include
gains (losses) on intercompany hedging activities with the Hedging business unit totaling $4.3
million and $(0.6) million, respectively. These intercompany amounts eliminate in consolidation.
Outlook
We anticipate strong demand throughout our aerospace product offering with the exception of
aerospace plate where shipments have been constrained by the overhang of excess inventory in the
supply chain. We nonetheless believe that our aerospace plate order rate will begin to ramp up in
the second half of 2011 and into 2012. Longer term we expect very substantial aerospace demand
growth driven by increasing build rates, larger airframes, and monolithic design.
Our outlook for general engineering and automotive applications is for continued slowly
improving underlying demand, modest restocking in the supply chain, and growth in new aluminum
extrusion automotive programs. We have not to date experienced any
40
change in demand for our
automotive and semi-conductor applications as a result of manufacturing disruptions in Japan, but
there nonetheless remains some uncertainty as to the potential impact, if any, on the overall
supply chain.
Overall for the second quarter of
2011 we expect demand and shipments similar to the first
quarter. As we benefit from improving operating efficiencies and are able to increase spot prices on high value added
products to recover rapidly increasing metal costs, we anticipate improved profitability (excluding non-run-rate items) compared to the first quarter
of 2011. While sharply rising raw material costs continue to pose a
challenge, we believe that market conditions going forward will
support more proactive pricing.
Looking longer term, we are very well positioned in attractive, growing markets and, with
stronger demand and the benefit from our organic and acquisition investments, our long-term
earnings potential remains strong.
41
All Other
Secondary Aluminum. We own a 49% interest in Anglesey, which operates a remelt and casting
facility in Wales. Anglesey produces value-added secondary aluminum ingot and billet and sells 49%
of its output to us. We in turn sell the secondary aluminum products to a third party, receiving a
portion of a premium over normal commodity market prices in transactions structured to largely
eliminate our metal price and currency exchange rate risks with respect to our income and cash flow
related to Anglesey. Because we in substance act as an agent in connection with sales of secondary
aluminum produced by Anglesey, our sales of such secondary aluminum are presented net of the cost
of sales. Accordingly, net sales and operating income in the quarter ended March 31, 2011 were all
zero. Shipments, net sales and operating income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 were $0.4
million, $0.3 million, and $0.1 million, respectively, representing residual activity of primary
aluminum purchased from Anglesey while it operated as a smelter (prior to September 30, 2009) and
resold by us in the first quarter of 2010.
As disclosed in Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, our investment in Anglesey has been
written down to zero, and we suspended the use of the equity method of accounting with respect to
our ownership in Anglesey commencing in the quarter ended September 30, 2009. We do not anticipate
resuming the use of the equity method of accounting with respect to our investment in Anglesey
unless and until (i) our share of any future net income of Anglesey equals or is greater than our
share of net losses not recognized during periods for which the equity method was suspended and
(ii) future dividends can be expected. We do not anticipate the occurrence of such event during the
next 12 months.
Hedging Activities. Our pricing of fabricated aluminum products is generally intended to lock
in a conversion margin (representing the value added from the fabrication process(es)) and to pass
metal price risk to our customers. However, in certain instances we enter into firm price
arrangements with our customers and incur price risk on our anticipated primary aluminum purchases
in respect of such customer orders. At the time our Fabricated Products segment enters into a firm
price customer contract, our Hedging business unit and Fabricated Products segment enter into an
internal hedge so that metal price risk resides in our Hedging business unit under All Other.
Results from internal hedging activities between our Fabricated Products segment and Hedging
business unit eliminate in consolidation. The Hedging business unit uses third-party hedging
instruments to limit exposure to metal-price risks related to firm price customer sales contracts.
These transactions are reflected on our balance sheet and recorded at fair value.
All hedging activities are managed centrally to minimize transaction costs, monitor
consolidated net exposures and allow for increased responsiveness to changes in market factors.
The table below provides a detail of operating income (loss) (in millions of dollars) from our
Hedging business unit for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Internal hedging with Fabricated Products1,2 |
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
Derivative settlements External metal hedging 2 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Market-to-market on derivative instruments2 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Eliminates in consolidation. |
|
2 |
|
Impacted by positions and market prices. |
Corporate and Other Activities. Operating expenses within the Corporate and Other business
unit represent general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to other business units
or segments. The table below presents non-run-rate items within the Corporate and Other business
unit, operating expense and operating expense excluding non-run-rate items (in millions of dollars)
for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Operating expense |
|
$ |
(6.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.7 |
) |
Impact to operating expense of non-run-rate items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VEBA net periodic benefit income (expense) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense excluding non-run-rate items |
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
Corporate operating expenses excluding non-run-rate items for the quarter ended March 31, 2011
were $1.6 million lower than such expenses for the comparable period in 2010. The decrease
primarily reflects (i) a $1.0 million decrease in employee compensation expense relating to our
long-term and short term incentive programs and other benefit programs and (ii) higher workers
compensation expense of $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2010 relating to historical workers
compensation cases due to changes in estimated incurred but not reported expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Summary
Cash and cash equivalents were $55.9 million at March 31, 2011, down from $135.6 million at
December 31, 2010. The decrease in cash is primarily driven by $83.2 million of cash consideration
paid to purchase the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility effective January 1, 2011, net of $4.9
million of cash acquired in the acquisition. Cash equivalents consist primarily of money market
accounts, investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased, and other
highly liquid investments. We place our cash in bank deposits and money market funds with high
credit quality financial institutions which invest primarily in commercial paper and time deposits
of prime quality, short-term repurchase agreements, and U.S. government agency notes. We have not
experienced losses on our temporary cash investments.
In addition to our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents described above, we have restricted
cash that is pledged or held as collateral in connection with workers compensation requirements
and certain other agreements. Short-term restricted cash, which is included in Prepaid expenses and
other current assets, totaled $7.8 million at March 31, 2011 and $0.9 million at December 31, 2010.
Long-term restricted cash, which is included in Other Assets, was $9.4 million at March 31, 2011
and $16.3 at December 31, 2010. The $6.9 million increase in short-term restricted cash and the
corresponding decrease in long-term restricted cash during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 result
from a reclassification based on the anticipated release to us, within the next 12 months, of funds
held in a trust account. Once the funds are released to us, such amount will be reclassified from
short-term restricted cash to cash and cash equivalents.
There were no borrowings under our revolving credit facility at either March 31, 2011 or
December 31, 2010.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing
activities for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 (in millions of dollars):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
29.4 |
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
All Other |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
|
Total cash flow from operating activities |
|
$ |
15.8 |
|
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
(89.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.5 |
) |
All Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Total cash flow from investing activities |
|
$ |
(89.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(17.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabricated Products |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
All Other |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow from financing activities |
|
$ |
(6.1 |
) |
|
$ |
100.5 |
|
|
|
|
43
Operating Activities
Fabricated Products For the quarter ended March 31, 2011, Fabricated Products segment
operating activities provided $29.4 million of cash. Cash provided in the quarter ended March 31,
2011 was primarily related to operating income excluding non-run-rate items, depreciation and
amortization of $31.4 million, an increase in accounts payable of $13.9 million, partially offset
by an increase in accounts receivable of $18.5 million.
Fabricated Products segment operating activities provided $37.4 million of cash in the first
quarter of 2010. Cash provided in the first quarter of 2010 consists primarily of operating income
of $23.0 million, an increase in accounts payable of $10.1 million and cash flows from significant
changes in long-term assets and liabilities of $13.4 million which included an increase of $10.5
million in deferred revenues related to cash received during the quarter from customers in advance
of periods for which performance is completed, partially offset by changes in current assets,
including an increase in accounts receivables of $6.7 million and an increase in inventory of $6.2
million including the effect of LIFO charges.
All Other Cash used in operations in All Other is comprised of (i) cash flows from
Anglesey-related operating activities, (ii) cash flows from hedging activities, and (iii) cash used
in corporate and other activities.
Corporate and other operating activities used $12.8 million and $14.1 million of cash during
the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Cash outflow from Corporate and
other operating activities in the first quarter of 2011 consisted primarily of payments relating to
general and administrative costs of $7.6 million, our short-term incentive program in the amount of
$1.9 million, and annual contributions to the VEBAs totaling $2.2 million. Cash outflow from
Corporate and other operating activities in the first quarter of 2010 consisted primarily of
payments relating to general and administrative costs of $9.2 million, our short-term incentive
program in the amount of $2.3 million and annual contributions to the VEBAs totaling $2.8 million.
Anglesey-related activities provided $0.9 million of cash for the quarter ended March 31,
2011, while Anglesey-related activities provided $0.2 million of cash for the quarter ended March
31, 2010. Operating cash flows were primarily related to changes in working capital in both
periods.
Hedging-related activities used $1.7 million and $1.0 million of cash during the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. Cash flows in our Hedging business unit are
related to realized hedging gains and losses on our derivative positions and are affected by the
timing of settlement of such positions.
Investing Activities
Fabricated Products Cash used in investing activities for Fabricated Products during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 was $89.4 million, compared to $13.5 million of cash used during the
quarter ended March 31, 2010. Cash used during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 consists of cash
used to purchase the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility in the amount of $83.2 million and
capital expenditures in the amount of $6.2 million. Cash used in investing activities during the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 was primarily related to capital expenditures. See Capital
Expenditures and Investments below for additional information.
All Other Cash used in investing activities during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 is
related to capital expenditures in the Corporate and Other business unit.
Financing Activities
Fabricated Products Cash used in investing activities for Fabricated Products during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 was $0.3 million, relating primarily to principal payments in respect
of the note issued by us in connection with our purchase of the Florence, Alabama facility.
All Other Cash used in financing activities during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 was
$5.8 million, representing $4.7 million of cash dividends paid to our stockholders and holders of
restricted stock and dividend equivalents paid to holders of restricted stock units and performance
shares in February 2011 and $1.1 million of cash used to repurchase our common stock in connection
with the vesting of employee restricted stock, restricted stock units
and performance shares and payment of related withholding tax
obligations. See Part II, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds of this Report.
Cash provided by financing activities during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $100.5
million. The cash inflow consists primarily of proceeds generated from the issuance of the Notes
and related transactions. We received $169.2 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Notes
after deducting the initial purchasers discounts and transaction fees and fees and expenses of
$5.8 million. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we paid $31.4 million to several
financial institutions (the Option Counterparties) to purchase the Call Options, and received
$14.3 million for issuing net-share-settled warrants (the Warrants). In addition, we used $44.2
million of the net proceeds from the Notes to repurchase approximately 1.2 million shares of our
common stock. Also during the
44
first quarter of 2010, we paid $4.9 million in cash dividends and
dividend equivalents to our stockholders and holders of our restricted stock, restricted stock
units and performance shares.
Sources of Liquidity
We believe our most significant sources of liquidity, funds generated from the expected
results of operations together with available cash and cash equivalents and borrowing availability
under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to finance our cash requirements, including
those associated with our strategic investments and existing expansion plans, for at least the next
12 months. Nevertheless, our ability to satisfy our working capital requirements and debt service
obligations, or fund planned capital expenditures, will substantially depend upon our future
operating performance (which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions), and financial,
business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, there can be no
assurance that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our revolving credit
facility.
Our revolving credit facility provides for up to $200.0 million of borrowing base, of which up
to a maximum of $60.0 million may be utilized for letters of credit. The revolving credit facility
is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the accounts receivable, inventory and
certain other related assets and proceeds of us and our domestic operating subsidiaries. Under the
revolving credit facility, we are able to borrow from time to time an aggregate amount equal to the
lesser of $200.0 million or a borrowing base comprised of approximately 85% of eligible accounts
receivable and approximately 65% of eligible inventory, reduced by certain reserves, all as
specified in the revolving credit facility.
The revolving credit facility matures in March 2014, at which time all outstanding amounts
thereunder will be due and payable. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest at
a rate equal to either a base prime rate or LIBOR, at our option, plus, in each case, a specified
variable percentage determined by reference to the then-remaining borrowing availability under the
revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility may, subject to certain conditions and the
agreement of lenders thereunder, be increased to up to $250.0 million.
Amounts owed under the revolving credit facility may be accelerated upon the occurrence of
various events of default, including, without limitation, the failure to make principal or interest
payments when due and breaches of covenants, representations and warranties set forth in the
revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility places limitations on the ability of us
and certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things, grant liens, engage in mergers, sell
assets, incur debt, make investments, undertake transactions with affiliates, pay dividends and
repurchase shares. In addition, we are required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio on a
consolidated basis at or above 1.1 to 1.0 if borrowing availability under the revolving credit
facility is less than $30 million.
Based on both the borrowing base determination in effect as of March 31, 2011 as well as the
borrowing base determination as of the date of filing of this Report, we had $200.0 million
available under the revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2011, there were no borrowings under
the revolving credit facility, and $9.8 million was being used to support outstanding letters of
credit, leaving $190.2 million of availability. As of the date of filing of this Report, there
were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility, letter of credit usage was $9.9 million,
and $190.1 million of the facility remained available. The interest rate applicable to any
borrowings under the revolving credit facility would have been 5.25% at March 31, 2011 for
overnight borrowings.
At March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the revolving credit
facility. We do not believe that the covenants under the revolving credit facility are reasonably
likely to limit our ability to raise additional debt or equity should we choose to do so during the
next 12 months. Additionally, we believe it is unlikely that we will trigger the liquidity
threshold requiring measurement of the fixed charge coverage ratio during the next 12 months.
Debt
Mandatory principal payments on the outstanding borrowings under our Notes and promissory
notes at March 31, 2011, excluding the discount and assuming no early conversions of our Notes, are
as follows for each of the periods ending December 31 (see Note 3 and Note 4 of Notes to Interim
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Report
for further details of the Notes and the promissory notes):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 and |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Convertible notes principal |
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
Nichols promissory note principal
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
LA promissory note principal |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
187.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
175.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
The Notes are not convertible into shares of our common stock, but instead, upon the
conversion of Notes, we would pay a cash conversion amount based on the market value of our common
stock at the time of conversion and a conversion rate equal to 20.6949 shares of our common stock
(such conversion rate being subject to adjustment under certain circumstances) per $1,000 principal
amount of the Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $48.32 per share).
Upon a conversion of Notes, any payment above the principal amount would be offset by payments we
would be entitled to receive from the Option Counterparties upon exercise of the Call Options that
we entered into contemporaneously with the issuance of the Notes. If our stock price, as measured
under the terms of the Warrants, exceeds $61.36 per share (such amount being subject to adjustment
under certain circumstances), we will issue to the Option Counterparties shares of our common stock
having a value equal to such excess, as measured under the terms of the Warrants. The Warrants may
not be exercised prior to their July 1, 2015 expiration date.
As of March 31, 2011, the Notes were not convertible. We do not expect the Notes to be
converted by investors prior to the first quarter of 2015 (if at all). See Note 3 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part 1, Item 1. Financial statements of this Report
for information on the circumstances in which the Notes will become convertible prior to January 1,
2015.
Capital Expenditures and Investments
A component of our long-term strategy is our capital expenditure program including our organic
growth initiatives. Capital spending during the first quarter of 2011 was spread among most of our
manufacturing locations on projects expected to reduce operating costs, improve product quality,
increase capacity or enhance operational security. Total capital expenditures and investments for
Fabricated Products are currently expected to be in the $35 million to $45 million range for all of
2011 and are expected to be funded using cash generated from operations, available cash and cash
equivalents, or borrowings under the revolving credit facility or other third-party financing
arrangements.
The level of anticipated capital expenditures for future periods may be adjusted from time to
time depending on our business plans, price outlook for fabricated aluminum products, our ability
to maintain adequate liquidity and other factors. No assurance can be provided as to the timing or
success of any such expenditures.
Effective January 1, 2011, we purchased the Chandler, Arizona (Extrusion) facility, which
manufacturers hard alloy extrusions for the aerospace industry. We paid net cash consideration of
$83.2 million (which was net of $4.9 million cash received in the acquisition) with existing cash
on hand, and assumed certain liabilities totaling approximately $1.0 million. The acquisition
positions us in a significant end market segment that provides a natural complement to our
offerings of sheet, plate, cold finish and drawn tube products for aerospace applications in our
Fabricated Products segment. See Note 5 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part 1, Item. 1. Financial Statements of this Report for information about the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with this transaction.
Dividends
During the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, we paid a total of $4.7 million
and $4.9 million, or $0.24 per common share and $0.24 per common share, respectively, in cash
dividends to our stockholders, including the holders of restricted stock, and dividend equivalents
to the holders of restricted stock units and the holders of performance shares.
On April 7, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the declaration of a quarterly cash dividend
of $0.24 per share on our common stock to be paid on May 13, 2011 to stockholders of record at the
close of business on April 25, 2011.
The future declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of the
Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors, including our financial and operating
results, financial condition, anticipated cash requirements and ability to satisfy conditions
contained in our revolving credit facility. We can give no assurance that dividends will be
declared and paid in the future.
Stock Repurchase Plan
Our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $75.0
million of our common shares, with repurchase transactions to occur in open-market or privately
negotiated transactions at such times and prices as management deemed appropriate and to be funded
with our excess liquidity after giving consideration to internal and external growth opportunities
and future cash flows. The program may be modified, extended or terminated by our Board of
Directors at any time. As of March 31, 2011, $46.9 million remained available for repurchases under
the existing repurchase authorization.
46
During the first quarter of 2010, in connection with the issuance of the Notes and pursuant to
a separate authorization from our Board of Directors, we repurchased $44.2 million, or
approximately 1.2 million shares of our outstanding common stock, in privately negotiated,
off-market transactions.
Under our Amended and Restated 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, we allow
participants to elect to have us withhold common shares to satisfy minimum statutory tax
withholding obligations arising from the recognition of income and the vesting of restricted stock
or restricted stock units. When we withhold these shares, we are to remit to the appropriate taxing
authorities the market price of the shares withheld, which could be deemed a purchase of the common
shares by us on the date of withholding. During the first quarter of 2011, we withheld 22,862
shares of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations. All such shares were withheld and
cancelled by us on the applicable vesting dates or dates on which income was recognized, and the
number of shares withheld was determined based on the closing price per common share as reported on
the Nasdaq Global Select Market on such dates.
Restrictions Related to Equity Capital
As discussed in Note 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, there are restrictions on the transfer of our common
shares.
Environmental Commitments and Contingencies
We are subject to a number of environmental laws and regulations, fines or penalties assessed
for alleged breaches of the environmental laws and regulations, and claims and litigation based
upon such laws and regulations. We have established procedures for regularly evaluating
environmental loss contingencies, including those arising from environmental reviews and
investigations and any other environmental remediation or compliance matters. Our environmental
accruals represent our undiscounted estimate of costs reasonably expected to be incurred based on
presently enacted laws and regulations, existing requirements, currently available facts, existing
technology, and our assessment of the likely remediation actions to be taken.
During the third quarter of 2010, we increased our environmental accruals in connection with
our submission of a draft feasibility study to the Washington State Department of Ecology on
September 8, 2010. The draft feasibility study included recommendations for a range of remediation
alternatives to primarily address the historical use of oils containing polychlorinated biphenyls,
or PCBs, at our Trentwood facility in Spokane, Washington, which may be implemented over the next
30 years. During the first quarter of 2011, we continued to work with Washington State Department
of Ecology to revise the draft feasibility study and to determine viable remedial approaches. As of
March 31, 2011, no agreement with the Washington State Department of Ecology has been reached on
the final remediation approach. The draft Feasibility Study is still subject to further reviews,
public comment and regulatory approvals before the final consent decree is issued. We expect the
consent decree to be issued in 2012.
Based on the recommended remediation alternatives in the draft Feasibility Study and other
existing historical environmental matters at the Trentwood facility and certain other locations
owned or operated by us, our environmental accrual was $20.0 million at March 31, 2011. Our
environmental accrual represents the low end of the range of incremental cost estimates based on
proposed alternatives in the draft feasibility study, investigational studies and other remediation
activities occurring at certain locations owned or operated by us. We expect that these remediation
actions will be taken over the next 30 years and estimate that the incremental direct costs
attributable to the remediation activities to be charged to these environmental accruals will be
approximately $0.8 million in 2011, $0.8 million in 2012, $2.7 million in 2013, $0.7 million in
2014, and $15.0 million in 2015 and years thereafter through the balance of the 30-year period.
As additional facts are developed, feasibility studies at various facilities are completed,
draft remediation plans are modified, necessary regulatory approval for the implementation of
remediation are obtained, alternative technologies are developed, and/or other factors change,
there may be revisions to managements estimates and actual costs may exceed the current
environmental accruals. We believe at this time that it is reasonably possible that undiscounted
costs associated with these environmental matters may exceed current accruals by amounts that could
be, in the aggregate, up to an estimated $22.0 million over the next 30 years. It is reasonably
possible that our recorded estimate of its obligation may change in the next 12 months.
Contractual Obligations, Commercial Commitments, and Off-Balance Sheet and Other Arrangements
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we granted additional stock-based awards to certain
members of management under our stock-based long term incentive plan (see Note 9 of Notes to
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of
this Report). Additional awards are expected to be made in future years.
47
With the exception of the above-mentioned transactions that took place in the quarter ended
March 31, 2011 and as otherwise disclosed herein, there has been no material change in our
contractual obligations other than in the ordinary course of business since the end of fiscal 2010.
See Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for additional information
regarding our contractual obligations, commercial commitments, and off-balance-sheet and other
arrangements.
Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. In connection
with the preparation of our financial statements, we are required to make assumptions and estimates
about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on
historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at
the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews
the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial
statements are presented fairly and in accordance with US GAAP. However, because future events and
their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions
and estimates, and such differences could be material.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We discuss our critical accounting
estimates in Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
There has been no material change in our critical accounting estimates since December 2010.
New Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of all recently adopted and recently issued but not yet adopted accounting
pronouncements, see New Accounting Pronouncements in Note 1 of Notes to Interim Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Report.
Available Information
Our
website is located at www.kaiseraluminum.com. The website includes a section for
investor relations under which we provide notifications of news or announcements regarding our
financial performance, including Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) filings, investor
events, and press and earnings releases. In addition, all Kaiser Aluminum Corporation filings
submitted to the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on form 8-K, and Proxy Statements for our annual meeting of stockholders, as well
as other Kaiser Aluminum Corporation reports and statements, are available on the SECs web site at
www.sec.gov. Such filings are also available for download free of charge on our website. In
addition, we provide and archive on our website webcasts of our quarterly earnings calls and
certain events in which management participates or hosts with members of the investment community,
and related investor presentations. The contents of the website is not intended to be incorporated
by reference into this Report or in any other report or document filed by us and any reference to
the websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our operating results are sensitive to changes in the prices of primary aluminum and
fabricated aluminum products, and also depend to a significant degree upon the volume and mix of
all products sold. As discussed more fully in Note 11 of Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements of this Report, we have historically
utilized hedging transactions to lock in a specified price or range of prices for certain products
which we sell or consume in our production process and to mitigate our exposure to changes in
energy prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
Sensitivity
Primary/Secondary Aluminum. Our pricing of fabricated aluminum products is generally intended
to lock in a conversion margin (representing the value added from the fabrication process(es)) and
to pass metal price risk to our customers. However, in certain instances we enter into firm price
arrangements with our customers and incur price risk on our anticipated primary aluminum purchases
in respect of such customer orders. At the time our Fabricated Products segment enters into a firm
price customer contract, our Hedging business unit and Fabricated Products segment enter into an
internal hedge so that metal price risk resides in our Hedging business unit under All Other.
Results from internal hedging activities between our Fabricated Products segment and Hedging
business unit eliminate in consolidation. The Hedging business unit uses third-party hedging
instruments to limit exposure to
48
metal-price risks related to firm price customer sales contracts
and such transactions may have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
and cash flows.
Total fabricated products shipments during the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and March 31,
2010 for which we had price risk were (in millions of pounds) 24.6 and 22.4, respectively. At
March 31, 2011, we had sales contracts for the delivery of fabricated aluminum products that have
the effect of creating price risk on anticipated primary aluminum purchases for the remainder of
2011, 2012 and 2013 and thereafter totaling approximately (in millions of pounds) 81.1, 14.7, and
0.4, respectively.
Foreign Currency. We, from time to time, enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge
material exposures for foreign currencies. Our primary foreign exchange exposure is our operating
costs of our London, Ontario facility and for cash commitments for equipment purchases.
We do not anticipate recognition of equity income or losses relating to our investment in
Anglesey for at least the next 12 months. Further, we expect to purchase and sell our share of
Anglesey secondary aluminum production under pricing mechanisms that are intended to eliminate
metal price risk and currency exchange risk. As a result, the British Pound Sterling exchange
exposure related to our income and cash flow relating to Anglesey is effectively eliminated in the
near-term.
Energy. We are exposed to energy price risk from fluctuating prices for natural gas and
electricity. We estimate that, before consideration of any hedging activities and the potential to
pass through higher natural gas prices to customers, each $1.00 change in natural gas prices (per
mmbtu) impacts our annual operating costs by approximately $3.8 million. We estimate that the
energy price risk from fluctuations in electricity prices, net of the impact of our
electricity-related hedging agreements, would not likely have a material effect on our annual
operating costs.
We, from time-to-time, in the ordinary course of business, enter into hedging transactions
with major suppliers of energy and energy-related financial investments. As of March 31, 2011, our
exposure to fluctuations in natural gas prices had been substantially reduced for approximately
94%, 74% and 22% of the expected natural gas purchases for the remainder of 2011, 2012 and 2013,
respectively.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management
recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required
to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures was performed as of the end of the period covered by this Report under the
supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive
officer and principal financial officer. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. We had no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting during the period covered by this Report that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART II OTHER INFOMRATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Reference is made to Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for information concerning material legal proceedings
with respect to the Company. There have been no material developments since December 31, 2010.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Reference is made to Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for information concerning risk factors. There have been
no material changes in the risk factors since December 31, 2010.
49
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
The following table provides information regarding our repurchases of our common shares during the quarter ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
of Shares that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
May Yet Be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Under the |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Program |
|
|
|
Purchased1 |
|
|
per
Share |
|
|
Programs2 |
|
|
(millions)2 |
|
January 1, 2011 - January 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2011 - February 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011 |
|
|
22,862 |
|
|
|
49.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
22,862 |
|
|
|
49.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46.9 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Under our Amended and Restated 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, we allow participants to elect to have us withhold common
shares to satisfy minimum statutory tax withholding obligations arising from the recognition of income and the vesting of restricted stock,
restricted stock units and performance shares. When we withhold these shares, we are to remit to the appropriate taxing authorities the market price
of the shares withheld, which could be deemed a purchase of the common shares by us on the date of withholding. During the quarter ended March 31,
2011, we withheld 22,862 shares of common stock to satisfy employee tax withholding obligations. All such shares were withheld and cancelled by us
on the applicable vesting dates or dates on which income was recognized, and the number of shares withheld was determined based on the closing price
per common share as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on such dates. |
|
2 |
|
In June 2008, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $75 million of our common shares. Repurchase transactions will
occur at such times and prices as management deems appropriate and will be funded with the Companys excess liquidity after giving consideration to
internal and external growth opportunities and future cash flows. Repurchases were not authorized to commence until after July 6, 2008. Repurchases
may be in open-market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions, and the program may be modified, extended, or terminated by the
Companys Board of Directors at any time. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. [Removed and Reserved.]
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
*10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 3, 2011, to Asset Purchase
Agreement between Desert Fabco Acquisition, LLC and
Alexco, L.L.C., dated as of October 12, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products 2011 Short-Term Incentive Plan
For Key Managers Summary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7,
2010, File No. 000-52105). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
2011 Form of Executive Officer Restricted Stock Award Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7, 2010, File No.
000-52105). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
2011 Form of Executive Officer Performance Shares Award Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7, 2010, File No.
000-52105). |
50
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation 2011 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program
Management Objectives and Formula for Determining Performance Shares
Earned Summary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7,
2010, File No. 000-52105). |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Jack A. Hockema pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Daniel J. Rinkenberger pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification of Jack A. Hockema pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Certification of Daniel J. Rinkenberger pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 101.INS **
|
|
XBRL Instance |
|
|
|
* 101.SCH **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
|
* 101.CAL **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation |
|
|
|
* 101.DEF **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition |
|
|
|
* 101.LAB **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label |
|
|
|
* 101.PRE **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, XBRL information is furnished but deemed not filed
for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed
for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not
subject to liability under these sections. |
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel J. Rinkenberger
|
|
|
Daniel J. Rinkenberger |
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Neal West
|
|
|
Neal West |
|
Date: April 28, 2011 |
Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
52
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
*10.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of January 3, 2011, to Asset Purchase Agreement between Desert Fabco Acquisition, LLC
and Alexco, L.L.C., dated as of October 12, 2010. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Kaiser Aluminum Fabricated Products 2011 Short-Term Incentive Plan For Key Managers Summary (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7, 2010, File No.
000-52105). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
2011 Form of Executive Officer Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7, 2010, File No. 000-52105). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
2011 Form of Executive Officer Performance Shares Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7, 2010, File No. 000-52105). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Kaiser Aluminum Corporation 2011 2013 Long-Term Incentive Program Management Objectives and Formula for
Determining Performance Shares Earned Summary (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed by the Company on March 7, 2010, File No. 000-52105). |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Certification of Jack A. Hockema pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Certification of Daniel J. Rinkenberger pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.1
|
|
Certification of Jack A. Hockema pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Certification of Daniel J. Rinkenberger pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* 101.INS **
|
|
XBRL Instance |
|
|
|
* 101.SCH **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
|
* 101.CAL **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation |
|
|
|
* 101.DEF **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition |
|
|
|
* 101.LAB **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label |
|
|
|
* 101.PRE **
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, XBRL information is furnished but deemed not filed
for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed
for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not
subject to liability under these sections. |
53