e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File No. 1-14771
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2962824 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
10 M Commerce Way, Woburn, MA 01801
(Address of principal executive offices)
(781) 994-4800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
As of October 31, 2007, 13,960,778 shares of the registrants common stock were outstanding.
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
28,737 |
|
|
$ |
9,437 |
|
Net investment in leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables due in installments |
|
|
40,455 |
|
|
|
76,660 |
|
Estimated residual value |
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
7,987 |
|
Initial direct costs |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance lease payments and deposits |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
Unearned income |
|
|
(13,682 |
) |
|
|
(29,033 |
) |
Allowance for credit losses |
|
|
(5,223 |
) |
|
|
(5,306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in leases |
|
|
25,661 |
|
|
|
50,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in service contracts, net |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Investment in rental contracts, net |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net |
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
59,721 |
|
|
$ |
62,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
1,110 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,585 |
|
|
|
2,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued at December 31, 2006 and September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;
13,811,442 and 13,958,278 shares issued at December 31, 2006
and September 30, 2007, respectively |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
44,136 |
|
|
|
45,520 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
11,862 |
|
|
|
14,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
56,136 |
|
|
|
59,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
59,721 |
|
|
$ |
62,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
|
$ |
3,406 |
|
|
$ |
2,403 |
|
|
$ |
8,092 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
5,121 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
16,436 |
|
|
|
10,706 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
993 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
Service fees and other |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
24,916 |
|
|
|
23,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
3,134 |
|
|
|
11,445 |
|
|
|
9,861 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
5,119 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
4,634 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Interest |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
6,417 |
|
|
|
5,354 |
|
|
|
21,338 |
|
|
|
16,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,425 |
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
6,999 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
|
$ |
2,154 |
|
|
$ |
4,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
13,803,996 |
|
|
|
13,956,881 |
|
|
|
13,784,650 |
|
|
|
13,910,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
13,942,572 |
|
|
|
14,180,213 |
|
|
|
13,928,399 |
|
|
|
14,146,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
December 31, 2006
and September 30, 2007
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
13,811,442 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
44,136 |
|
|
$ |
11,862 |
|
|
$ |
56,136 |
|
Warrant exercises |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Stock issued for accrued compensation |
|
|
77,654 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
Restricted stock granted |
|
|
11,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Conversion of share-based liability awards
to equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
932 |
|
Amortization of unearned compensation |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Common stock dividends ($0.15 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
|
13,958,278 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
45,521 |
|
|
$ |
14,241 |
|
|
$ |
59,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from customers |
|
$ |
30,840 |
|
|
$ |
30,143 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees |
|
|
(10,905 |
) |
|
|
(9,892 |
) |
Income taxes paid |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Interest received |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
20,423 |
|
|
|
20,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in lease and rental contracts |
|
|
(12,426 |
) |
|
|
(37,219 |
) |
Investment in direct costs |
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
Investment in property and equipment |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(12,848 |
) |
|
|
(38,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from secured debt |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Repayment of secured debt |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Repayment of subordinated debt |
|
|
(2,302 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of common stock warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
Payment of dividends |
|
|
(5,497 |
) |
|
|
(2,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(7,921 |
) |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(19,301 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
32,926 |
|
|
|
28,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
32,580 |
|
|
$ |
9,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,154 |
|
|
$ |
4,397 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unearned income, net of initial direct costs |
|
|
(2,403 |
) |
|
|
(8,092 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,634 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
5,119 |
|
Recovery of equipment cost and residual value |
|
|
9,497 |
|
|
|
15,187 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
Non-cash interest expense (amortization of debt discount) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes payable |
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
835 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
287 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
20,423 |
|
|
$ |
20,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of stock issued for compensation |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
Conversion of share-based liability awards to equity awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
932 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
A. Nature of Business
MicroFinancial Incorporated (referred to as MicroFinancial, we, us or our) operates
primarily through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, TimePayment Corp. and Leasecomm Corporation.
TimePayment is a specialized commercial finance company that leases and rents microticket
equipment and provides other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment is
approximately $6,400 while Leasecomm historically financed contracts of approximately $1,900. We
primarily source our originations through a nationwide network of independent equipment vendors,
sales organizations and other dealer-based origination networks. We fund our operations through
cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our line of credit.
B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements.
Accordingly, our interim statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required
for our annual financial statements. In the opinion of our management, the condensed consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
considered necessary for a fair presentation of these interim results. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. The results for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the full year.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Given the nature of the microticket market and the individual size of
each transaction, the business does not warrant the creation of a formal credit review committee to
review individual transactions. Rather, we have developed a sophisticated, risk-adjusted pricing
model and automated the credit scoring, approval and collection processes. We believe that with
the proper risk-adjusted pricing model, we can grant credit to a wide range of applicants provided
that we price appropriately for the associated risk. As a result of approving a wide range of
credits, we experience a relatively high level of delinquencies and write-offs in our portfolio.
We periodically review the credit scoring and approval process to ensure that the automated system
is making appropriate credit decisions. Given the nature of the microticket market and the
individual size of each transaction, we do not evaluate transactions individually for the purpose
of developing and determining the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Contracts in our
portfolio are not re-graded subsequent to the initial extension of credit and the allowance is not
allocated to specific contracts. Rather, we view the contracts as having common characteristics
and we maintain a general allowance against our entire portfolio utilizing historical collection
statistics as the basis for the amount.
We have adopted a consistent, systematic procedure for establishing and maintaining an
appropriate allowance for credit losses for microticket transactions. We review, on a static pool
basis, the collection experience on various months originations and the recoveries made on
accounts written off. The results of these static pool analyses reflect our actual historical
collection experience. We also review the credit scores of the lessees and assign a probability of
loss on each transaction based on industry metrics. We then consider current delinquency
statistics, current economic conditions, and other relevant factors which might affect the
performance of our portfolio. The combination of historical experience, credit scores, delinquency
levels, and the review of current factors provides the basis for our analysis of the adequacy of
the allowance. We take charge-offs against our receivables when such receivables are 360 days past
due and no contact has been made with the lessee for 12 months. However, collection efforts
continue and we recognize recoveries in future periods when cash is received.
7
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
A summary of the activity in our allowance for credit losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Allowance for credit losses, beginning |
|
$ |
8,714 |
|
|
$ |
5,223 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
5,119 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(12,683 |
) |
|
|
(8,733 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
3,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses, ending |
|
$ |
5,587 |
|
|
$ |
5,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per Share
Basic net income per common share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share gives effect to all
potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net
income per share does not assume the issuance of common shares that have an antidilutive effect on
net income per common share. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, 1,075,000 options,
175,000 warrants and 20,000 restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted net
income per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30,
2006, 1,075,000 options and 175,000 warrants were excluded from the computation of diluted net
income per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, 1,115,188 options were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per
share because their effect was antidilutive. On October 5, 2007 75,000 warrants were exercised by
the warrant holder which were subsequently repurchased and retired by the Company at a cost of
$120,000. These warrants were included as dilutive shares as of September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
|
$ |
2,154 |
|
|
$ |
4,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
13,803,996 |
|
|
|
13,956,881 |
|
|
|
13,784,650 |
|
|
|
13,910,234 |
|
Dilutive effect of common stock
options, warrants and restricted stock |
|
|
138,576 |
|
|
|
223,332 |
|
|
|
143,749 |
|
|
|
236,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computation of net income
per common share diluted |
|
|
13,942,572 |
|
|
|
14,180,213 |
|
|
|
13,928,399 |
|
|
|
14,146,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Employee Compensation
Under our 1998 Equity Incentive Plan, we reserved 4,120,380 shares of common stock for
issuance. In February 2007, we granted ten year options to our executive officers to purchase
40,188 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.77 per share. The fair value of these
awards was $2.08 per share. The options vest on the
8
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
fifth anniversary of their grant. No options were exercised or cancelled during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007.
On February 4, 2004, a new non-employee director was granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock
with a fair value of $3.17 per share. On August 15, 2006, a second new non-employee director was
granted 25,000 shares of restricted stock with a fair value of $3.35 per share. In each case, the
restricted stock vested 20% upon grant and vests 5% on the first day of each quarter after the
grant date. As vesting occurs, compensation expense is recognized. As of September 30, 2007,
32,500 shares were fully vested between these two directors.
Information relating to stock options outstanding at September 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
|
|
359,391 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12.31 |
|
|
|
359,391 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
13.54 |
|
|
|
40,609 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.54 |
|
|
|
40,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.78 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.78 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.10 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.10 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
167,500 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
167,500 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
40,188 |
|
|
|
9.42 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,282,688 |
|
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
$ |
9.19 |
|
|
|
1,242,500 |
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, the total share based employee
compensation cost recognized was $72,000 and $12,000 respectively. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2007, the total share based employee compensation cost recognized was
$207,000 and $537,000, respectively.
For share-based liability awards, we recognize compensation cost equal to the greater of (a)
the grant date fair value or (b) the fair value of the modified liability when it is settled. As a
result of modifications to certain awards in 2005, some awards made under our plan were previously
classified as share-based liability awards. We recognized any additional incremental compensation
cost (benefit) for share-based liability awards as it was incurred. As of March 31, 2007, our
share-based liability awards were fully vested. In April 2007, we modified the exercise terms of
all our outstanding share-based liability awards by restricting the settlement methods available to
the option holders and converted these awards to equity awards. As a result of the modifications,
our cumulative share-based compensation liability of $932,000 was reclassified to additional
paid-in capital.
For the three months ended September 30, 2006 we recognized an incremental compensation
benefit of $4,000 due to the change in the fair value of the share-based liability awards
outstanding. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007, we recognized incremental
compensation expense (benefit) of $(3,000) and $474,000, respectively, due to the change in the
fair value of the share-based liability awards outstanding.
We estimate the fair value of our stock options using a Black-Scholes valuation model,
consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. Key input
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the expected option term,
volatility of the stock, the risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield.
The fair values as of April 2007, of the outstanding options previously classified as
liability instruments under SFAS 123(R) were estimated using expected lives of one to three years,
annualized volatility of 43.43%, an expected dividend yield of 3.64% and a risk free interest rate
of 4.58%.
9
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
The expected life represents the average period of time that the options are expected to be
outstanding given consideration to vesting schedules; annualized volatility is based on historical
volatilities of our common stock; dividend yield represents the current dividend yield expressed as
a constant percentage of our stock price and the risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield
curve in effect on the measurement date for periods corresponding to the expected life of the
option. We were previously required to remeasure the fair value of our share-based liability
awards at each reporting date.
C. Notes Payable
On September 29, 2004, we entered into a three-year $30 million line of credit with CIT
Commercial Services, a unit of CIT Group (CIT). Outstanding borrowings bore interest at Prime
plus 1.5% or at the 90-day London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 4.0%. As of December 31,
2006, the interest rate on the line of credit was 9.75%. On July 20, 2007, by mutual agreement
between CIT and us, we paid off and terminated the CIT line of credit without penalty.
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a new three-year $30 million line of credit with Sovereign
Bank based on qualified TimePayment lease receivables. Outstanding borrowings bear interest at
Prime or at LIBOR plus 2.75% and are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security
interest in all of our other assets. Under the terms of the facility, loans are Prime Rate Loans,
unless we elect LIBOR Loans. If a LIBOR Loan is not renewed at maturity it automatically coverts
to a Prime Rate Loan. The prime rate at September 30, 2007 was 7.75%. As of September 30, 2007,
the 30 and 90 day LIBOR rates were 5.13% and 5.23%, respectively. The line of credit has financial
covenants that we must comply with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of
September 30, 2007, we were in compliance with all covenants under the line of credit. No loans
were outstanding as of September 30, 2007.
D. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
We are involved in certain legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted, we do not believe the ultimate
resolution of any existing matters will have a material effect on our results of operations or
financial position.
Lease Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and have a pipeline of applications that have
been approved where a lease has not been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become
binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including the
receipt of the lease, supporting documentation and verification with the lessee. Since we fund on
the same day a lease is verified, we have no outstanding commitments to lend.
E. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The
adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results
of operations. We account for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of
our provision for federal and state income taxes.
As of December 31, 2006, we had a liability of $760,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and a
liability of $160,000 for accrued interest and penalties related to various state income tax
matters. As of September 30, 2007 we had a liability of $455,000 for unrecognized tax benefits and
a liability of $160,000 for accrued interest and penalties. Of these amounts, approximately
$400,000 would impact our effective tax rate after a $215,000 federal tax benefit for state income
taxes. The decrease in the unrecognized tax benefits and interest is due to the release of $25,000
of state tax reserves related to the settlement of state audits and $300,000 related to expiration
of state
10
MICROFINANCIAL INCORPORATED
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tables in thousands, except share and per share data)
statutes of limitations offset by $20,000 in additional accrued expense. It is reasonably
possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may change significantly within the
next 12 months; however at this time we are unable to estimate the change.
Our federal income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended on or after
December 31, 2004 and our state income tax returns are subject to examination for tax years ended
on or after December 31, 2001.
11
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following information should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Forward-Looking Information
Statements in this document that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In
addition, words such as believes, anticipates, expects and similar expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that a number of important factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by
us or on our behalf. Such statements contain a number of risks and uncertainties, including but not
limited to: our need for financing in order to originate leases and contracts; our dependence on
point-of-sale authorization systems and expansion into new markets; our significant capital
requirements; risks associated with economic downturns; higher interest rates; intense competition;
changes in our regulatory environment; the availability of qualified personnel, and risks
associated with acquisitions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our view only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to
publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. We
cannot assure that we will be able to anticipate or respond timely to changes which could adversely
affect our operating results. Results of operations in any past period should not be considered
indicative of results to be expected in future periods. Fluctuations in operating results may
result in fluctuations in the price of our common stock. Statements relating to past dividend
payments or our current dividend policy should not be construed as a guarantee that any future
dividends will be paid. For a more complete description of the prominent risks and uncertainties
inherent in our business, see the risk factors included in our most recent Annual Report on Form
10-K and other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Overview
We are a specialized commercial finance company that provides microticket equipment leasing
and other financing services. The average amount financed by TimePayment is approximately $6,400.
Between October 2002 and June 2004, an interruption in our financing sources forced us to suspend
substantially all origination activity conducted through our subsidiary Leasecomm Corporation. In
June 2004, we secured a credit facility which enabled us to resume contract originations through
TimePayment Corp., a new wholly-owned operating subsidiary. In September 2004, we secured a
three-year, $30 million, senior secured revolving line of credit from CIT Commercial Services, a
unit of CIT Group. On July 20, 2007, we terminated and paid off the CIT line of credit and on
August 2, 2007, we entered into a new three-year $30 million line of credit with Sovereign Bank.
We continue to take steps to control our overhead, including a reduction in headcount from 87
at December 31, 2005 to 67 at December 31, 2006. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
our employee headcount increased to 72 as we hired additional sales and marketing personnel to
support our sales and marketing initiatives.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note B to the condensed
consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report and in Note B to the
consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain accounting policies
are particularly important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and results of
operations. These policies require the application of significant judgment by us and as a result,
are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. In applying these policies, we make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and
the related disclosures. We base our
12
estimates and judgments on historical experience, terms of existing contracts, observance of
trends in the industry, information obtained from dealers and other sources, and on various other
assumptions that we believe to be reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies, including revenue recognition, maintaining the allowance for
credit losses, determining provisions for income taxes, and accounting for share-based compensation
are each discussed in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Effective January 1, 2007, we
adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. We have reviewed and determined that
those policies remain our critical accounting policies and we did not make any changes in those
policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Results of Operations Three months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2006
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
1,007 |
|
|
|
238.2 |
% |
|
$ |
3,406 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
5,121 |
|
|
|
(36.2 |
)% |
|
|
3,268 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
(30.3 |
)% |
|
|
303 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
|
|
524 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
|
|
415 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
(55.7 |
)% |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
7,842 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
$ |
8,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the
gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs
incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross
lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned
lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the
interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the
leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.
Total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $8.1 million, an increase of
$256,000 or 3.3%, from the three months ended September 30, 2006. The overall increase was due to
growth in the leasing revenues associated with our new lease originations. The increase in the
leasing revenues was partially offset by a decrease in rental income of $1,853,000 or 36.2% and a
decrease in service contract income of $132,000 or 30.3%. The primary reason for the decline in
rental income is explained by attrition rates in the two sources of rental income. One source is
rental agreements that are originated and cancellable on a monthly basis. The other is the rental
income that is recognized at the end of the lease term when a lessee chooses to keep the equipment
and rents it on a monthly basis. Since we resumed funding in 2004, we have not originated any new
rental contracts, and few lease contracts have been eligible to convert to rental arrangements
since they have not reached the end of term. In addition, we have not funded any new service
contracts since we resumed funding in 2004; therefore this segment of revenue is expected to
continually decline.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
3,312 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
|
$ |
3,134 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.7 |
% |
13
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining corporate
functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses decreased by
$178,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2006. The decrease was primarily driven by a reduction of $510,000 of collection
expenses and $156,000 in the costs of goods sold. These expense reductions were a result of the
decrease in our portfolio of rental and service contracts, the volume and valuation of particular
pieces of equipment sold and our cost control efforts.
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
1,887 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
$ |
1,919 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
24.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses increased by $32,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006, while net
charge-offs decreased by to $1.5 million from $3.2 million. The provision was based on providing a
general allowance for leases funded during the period and our analysis of actual and expected
losses in our portfolio. Dealer funding was $14.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007 compared to $6.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
$ |
76 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
(87.2 |
)% |
|
|
120 |
|
Amortization service contracts |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
(56.4 |
)% |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
1,195 |
|
|
|
(75.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
We also offer a rental agreement, which allows the customer, assuming the contract is current
and no event of default exists, to terminate the contract at any time by returning the equipment
and providing us with 30 days notice. These assets are recorded at cost and depreciated over an
estimated life of 36 months. This term is based upon our historical experience. In the event that
the contract terminates prior to the end of the 36 month period, the remaining net book value is
expensed.
Service contracts are recorded at cost and amortized over their estimated life of 84 months.
In a typical service contract acquisition, a homeowner will purchase a home security system and
simultaneously sign a contract with the security dealer for monthly monitoring of the system. The
security dealer will then sell the rights to that monthly payment to us. We perform all of the
processing, billing, collection and administrative work on the service contract. The estimated
life is based upon the expected life of such contracts in the security monitoring industry and our
14
historical experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 84 month
term, the remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts decreased by $816,000 and amortization of service
contracts decreased by $119,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2006. The decreases in depreciation and amortization are due to
the decrease in the overall size of our portfolio of rental equipment and service contracts as well
as the fact that a greater percentage of the assets are fully depreciated. Depreciation and
amortization of property and equipment increased by $28,000 for the three months ended September
30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006.
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
(43.5 |
)% |
|
$ |
13 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our line of credit and subordinated notes payable.
Interest expense decreased by $10,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2006. This decrease resulted primarily from our decreased
level of borrowings. At September 30, 2007, we had no outstanding borrowings, compared to total
debt of $338,000, consisting of notes payable of $38,000 and subordinated notes payable of
$300,000, at September 30, 2006.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
941 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
40.2 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by
$368,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2006. This increase resulted primarily from the $1.3 million increase in pre-tax
income and was partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate from 40.2% for the three
months ended September 30, 2006 to 34.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The
decrease in the overall effective tax rate is primarily due to our expected utilization of certain
state net operating loss carryforwards which results in a lower effective state tax rate and the
release of $325,000 of state tax reserves related to the settlement of state audits and expiration
of state statutes of limitations.
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $14.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of
$8.5 million or 132.8%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investment in service contracts and net investment in
rental contracts increased from $68.5 million at June 30, 2007 to $85.1 million at September 30,
2007. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $554,000 or 8.4%, to $7.2 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the three months ended September
30, 2006.
15
Results of Operations Nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2006
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Income on financing leases |
|
$ |
2,403 |
|
|
|
236.7 |
% |
|
$ |
8,092 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
16,436 |
|
|
|
(34.9 |
)% |
|
|
10,706 |
|
Income on service contracts |
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
(32.8 |
)% |
|
|
993 |
|
Loss and damage waiver fees |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
1,442 |
|
Service fees and other income |
|
|
2,075 |
|
|
|
(45.5 |
)% |
|
|
1,131 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
(28.3 |
)% |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
24,916 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
)% |
|
$ |
23,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our lease contracts are accounted for as financing leases. At origination, we record the
gross lease receivable, the estimated residual value of the leased equipment, initial direct costs
incurred and the unearned lease income. Unearned lease income is the amount by which the gross
lease receivable plus the estimated residual value exceeds the cost of the equipment. Unearned
lease income and initial direct costs incurred are amortized over the related lease term using the
interest method. Other revenues such as loss and damage waiver fees, service fees relating to the
leases and contracts, and rental revenues are recognized as they are earned.
Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $23.1 million, a decrease of
$ 1.8 million, or 7.2%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The overall decrease was
due to a decrease of $ 5.7 million in rental income, a decrease of $943,000 in service fees and
other income, and a decrease of $485,000 in income on service contracts significantly offset by an
increase of $5.7 million in income on financing leases. The primary reason for the decline in
rental income is explained by attrition rates in the two sources of rental income. One source is
rental agreements that are originated and cancellable on a monthly basis. The other is the rental
income that is recognized at the end of the lease term when a lessee chooses to keep the equipment
and rents it on a monthly basis. Since we resumed funding in 2004, we have not originated any new
rental contracts, and few lease contracts have been eligible to convert to rental arrangements
since they have not reached the end of term. In addition, we have not funded any new service
contracts since we resumed funding in 2004; therefore this segment of revenue is expected to
continually decline.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
11,445 |
|
|
|
(13.8 |
)% |
|
$ |
9,861 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.7 |
% |
Our selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses include costs of maintaining corporate
functions including accounting, finance, collections, legal, human resources, sales and
underwriting, and information systems. SG&A expenses also include service fees and other marketing
costs associated with our portfolio of leases and rental contracts. SG&A expenses decreased by
$1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. The decrease was primarily driven by reductions in legal and professional fees
of $340,000, a reduction of $1,037,000 in collection expense and a reduction of $533,000 of cost of
goods sold. These expense reductions were a result of the settlement of outstanding litigation, a
decrease in our portfolio of rentals and service contracts, an improvement in the credit quality of
our lease portfolio and our cost control efforts. Personnel-related expenses increased by $223,000
as lower payroll and benefits costs were offset by a $537,000 increase in stock-based compensation
expense.
16
Provision for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
5,124 |
|
|
|
(.0) |
% |
|
$ |
5,119 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
We maintain an allowance for credit losses on our investment in leases, service contracts and
rental contracts at an amount that we believe is sufficient to provide adequate protection against
losses in our portfolio. Our provision for credit losses decreased by $5,000 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006, while net
charge-offs decreased by 38.9% to $5 million. The provision was based on providing a general
allowance on leases funded during the period and our analysis of actual and expected losses in our
portfolio. Dealer funding was $37.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared
to $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Depreciation fixed assets |
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
$ |
203 |
|
Depreciation rental equipment |
|
|
3,623 |
|
|
|
(84.5 |
) |
|
|
563 |
|
Amortization service contracts |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
(61.3 |
) |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
4,634 |
|
|
|
(76.3) |
% |
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization expense consists of depreciation on fixed assets and rental
equipment, and the amortization of service contracts. Fixed assets are recorded at cost and
depreciated over their expected useful lives. Certain rental contracts are originated as a result
of the renewal provisions of our lease agreements where at the end of lease term, the customer may
elect to continue to rent the leased equipment on a month-to-month basis. The rental equipment is
recorded at its residual value and depreciated over a term of 12 months. This term represents the
estimated life of a previously leased piece of equipment and is based upon our historical
experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 12 month period, the
remaining net book value is expensed.
We also offer a rental agreement, which allows the customer, assuming the contract is current
and no event of default exists, to terminate the contract at any time by returning the equipment
and providing us with 30 days notice. These assets are recorded at cost and depreciated over an
estimated life of 36 months. This term is based upon our historical experience. In the event that
the contract terminates prior to the end of the 36 month period, the remaining net book value is
expensed.
Service contracts are recorded at cost and amortized over their estimated life of 84 months.
In a typical service contract acquisition, a homeowner will purchase a home security system and
simultaneously sign a contract with the security dealer for monthly monitoring of the system. The
security dealer will then sell the rights to that monthly payment to us. We perform all of the
processing, billing, collection and administrative work on the service contract. The estimated
life is based upon the expected life of such contracts in the security monitoring industry and our
historical experience. In the event the contract terminates prior to the end of the 84 month term,
the remaining net book value is expensed.
Depreciation expense on rental contracts decreased by $3.1 million and amortization of service
contracts decreased by $526,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. The decreases in depreciation and amortization are due to the
decrease in the overall size of our portfolio of rental equipment and service contracts as well as
the fact that a greater percentage of the assets are fully depreciated. Depreciation and
amortization of property and equipment increased by $49,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
17
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
Change |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Interest |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
|
(71.1 |
)% |
|
$ |
39 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
We pay interest on borrowings under our line of credit and subordinated notes payable.
Interest expense decreased by $96,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2006. This decrease resulted primarily from our decreased
level of borrowings. At September 30, 2007, we had no outstanding borrowings, compared to total
debt of $338,000, consisting of notes payable of $38,000 and subordinated notes payable of
$300,000, at September 30, 2006.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
1,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,530 |
|
As a percent of revenue |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
As a percent of income before taxes |
|
|
39.8 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
The provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any necessary
valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets, involves summarizing temporary
differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as leases, for tax and accounting
purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded on
the balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income or tax carry-back availability and to the extent we believe recovery is more
likely than not, a valuation allowance is unnecessary. The provision for income taxes increased by
$1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. This increase resulted primarily from the $3.4 million increase in pre-tax
income partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate from 39.8% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 to 36.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in the
overall effective tax rate is primarily due to our expected utilization of certain state net
operating loss carryforwards which results in a lower effective state tax rate and the release of
$325,000 of state tax reserves related to the settlement of state audits and expiration of state
statutes of limitations.
Other Operating Data
Dealer funding was $37.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of
$24.9 million or 199.2%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006. We continue to
concentrate on our business development efforts, which include increasing the size of our vendor
base and sourcing a larger number of applications from those vendors. Receivables due in
installments, estimated residual values, net investment in service contracts and net investment in
rental contracts increased from $45.2 million at December 31, 2006 to $85 million at September 30,
2007. Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $365,000, or 1.8%, to $20.8 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2006.
Exposure to Credit Losses
The amounts in the table below represent the balance of delinquent receivables on an exposure
basis for all leases, rental contracts, and service contracts in our portfolio. An exposure basis
aging classifies the entire receivable based on the invoice that is the most delinquent. For
example, in the case of a rental or service contract, if a receivable is 90 days past due, all
amounts billed and unpaid are placed in the over 90 days past due category. In the case of lease
receivables, where the minimum contractual obligation of the lessee is booked as a receivable at
the inception of the lease, if a receivable is 90 days past due, the entire receivable, including
all amounts billed and
18
unpaid as well as the minimum contractual obligation yet to be billed, will be placed in the
over 90 days past due category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Current |
|
$ |
29,027 |
|
|
|
71.8 |
% |
|
$ |
63,298 |
|
|
|
82.6 |
% |
31-60 days past due |
|
|
1,607 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3,466 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
61-90 days past due |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Over 90 days past due |
|
|
8,996 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
7,508 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross receivables due in installments |
|
$ |
40,455 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
76,660 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Our business is capital-intensive and requires access to substantial short-term and long-term
credit to fund lease originations. Since inception, we have funded our operations primarily
through borrowings under our credit facilities, on-balance sheet securitizations, the issuance of
subordinated debt, free cash flow and our initial public offering completed in February 1999. We
will continue to require significant additional capital to maintain and expand our funding of
leases and contracts, as well as to fund any future acquisitions or portfolios. In the near term,
we expect to finance the business utilizing our cash on hand and our new three-year $30 million
line of credit with Sovereign Bank. Additionally, our uses of cash include the payment of interest
and principal on borrowings, selling, general and administrative expenses, income taxes and capital
expenditures.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, our primary source of liquidity was
cash provided by operating activities. We generated cash flow from operations of $20.8 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to $20.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2007, we had no outstanding borrowings under our Sovereign
Bank line of credit.
We used net cash in investing activities of $38 million during the nine months ended September
30, 2007 and $12.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Investing activities
primarily relate to the origination of leases and the increase in cash used is consistent with our
focused and targeted sales and marketing effort.
Net cash used in financing activities was $2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 and $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Financing activities primarily
consist of the repayment of notes payable and dividend payments.
We believe that cash flows from our portfolio, cash on hand and available borrowings on our
new three-year $30 million line of credit with Sovereign Bank will be sufficient to support our
operations and lease origination activity in the near term.
Borrowings
We utilize our line of credit to fund the origination and acquisition of leases. Borrowings
outstanding under our lines of credit consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Unused |
|
|
Maximum |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Capacity |
|
|
Available |
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
7.75 |
% |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 29, 2004, we entered into a three-year $30 million line of credit with CIT
Commercial Services, a unit of CIT Group (CIT). Outstanding borrowings bore interest at prime plus
1.5% or at the 90-day London
19
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 4.0%. On July 20, 2007, by mutual agreement between CIT
and us, we paid off and terminated the CIT line of credit without penalty, and CIT released its
security interests and liens.
On August 2, 2007, we entered into a new three-year $30 million line of credit with Sovereign
Bank based on qualified lease receivables. Outstanding borrowings bear interest at prime or at
LIBOR plus 2.75% and are collateralized by eligible lease contracts and a security interest in all
of our other assets. As of September 30, 2007 the qualified lease receivables eligible under the
borrowing base exceeded the $30 million line of credit. The line of credit has financial covenants
that we must comply with to obtain funding and avoid an event of default. As of September 30,
2007, we were in compliance with all covenants under the line of credit.
Dividends
During 2005, we declared dividends of $0.05 per share payable to shareholders of record on
each of February 9, 2005, April 29, 2005, July 27, 2005, October 27, 2005 and December 28, 2005,
and a special dividend of $0.25 per share payable to shareholders of record on January 31, 2006.
During 2006, we declared dividends of $0.05 per share payable to shareholders of record on
each of March 31, 2006, June 30, 2006, September 29, 2006 and December 29, 2006.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we declared dividends of $0.05 payable to
shareholders of record on each of March 30, 2007, June 29, 2007 and September 28, 2007.
Future dividend payments are subject to ongoing review and evaluation by our Board of
Directors. The decision as to the amount and timing of future dividends, if any, will be made in
light of our financial condition, capital requirements and growth plans, as well as our external
financing arrangements and any other factors our Board of Directors may deem relevant. We can give
no assurance as to the amount and timing of future dividends.
Contractual Obligations and Lease Commitments
Contractual Obligations
We have entered into various agreements, such as debt and operating lease agreements that
require future payments. As of September 30, 2007, there were no outstanding borrowings on the
Sovereign Bank line of credit which matures in August 2010 and our future minimum lease payments
under non-cancelable operating leases were $59,000 in 2007, $237,000 in 2008, $237,000 in 2009 and
$237,000 in 2010.
Commitments
We accept lease applications on a daily basis and have a pipeline of applications that have
been approved, where a lease has not yet been originated. Our commitment to lend does not become
binding until all of the steps in the lease origination process have been completed, including but
not limited to, the receipt of a complete and accurate lease document, all required supporting
information and successful verification with the lessee. Since we fund on the same day a lease is
successfully verified, we have no firm outstanding commitments to lend.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note E of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
discussion of the impact of recent accounting pronouncements.
20
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The following discussion about our risk management activities includes forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. In the normal course of operations, we also face
risks that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable. Such risks principally include credit
risk and legal risk, and are not represented in the analysis that follows.
The implicit yield on all of our leases and contracts is on a fixed interest rate basis due to
the leases and contracts having scheduled payments that are fixed at the time of origination. When
we originate or acquire leases or contracts, we base our pricing in part on the spread we expect to
achieve between the implicit yield on each lease or contract and the effective interest rate we
expect to incur in financing such lease or contract through our credit facility. Increases in
interest rates during the term of a lease or contract could narrow or eliminate the spread, or
result in a negative spread. We have adopted a policy designed to protect us against interest rate
volatility.
Given the relatively short average life of our leases and contracts, our goal is to maintain a
blend of fixed and variable interest rate obligations which limits our interest rate risk. As of
September 30, 2007, we have repaid all of our fixed-rate debt and had no outstanding variable
interest rate obligations. Given the current level of borrowings our interest rate risk is not
material.
We maintain an investment portfolio in accordance with our investment policy guidelines. The
primary objectives of the investment guidelines are to preserve capital, maintain sufficient
liquidity to meet our operating needs, and to maximize return. We minimize investment risk by
limiting the amount invested in any single security and by focusing on conservative investment
choices with short terms and high credit quality standards. We do not use derivative financial
instruments or invest for speculative trading purposes.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures: As of the end of the period covered by this report, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act Rule
13a-15. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. Disclosure controls and
procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms.
Internal Controls: During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, no changes were made
to our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
21
Part II Other Information
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in certain legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.
While the outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted, we do not believe the ultimate
resolution of any existing matters will have a material effect on our results of operations or
financial position.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
For a discussion of the material risks that we face relating to our business, financial performance
and industry, as well as other risks that an investor in our common stock may face, see the factors
discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this
report are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us
or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition or operating results.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
|
10.1 |
|
Credit Agreement dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Unlimited Guaranty of Registrant dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
Unlimited Guaranty of Leasecomm dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.4 |
|
Security Agreement between Borrower and Agent dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
Security Agreement between Registrant and Agent dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.6 |
|
Security Agreement between Leasecomm and Agent dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.7 |
|
Trademark Security Agreement and License dated August 2, 2007 by Borrower (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.8 |
|
Trademark Security Agreement and License dated August 2, 2007 by Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8,
2007) |
|
|
10.9 |
|
Trademark Security Agreement and License dated August 2, 2007 by Leasecomm
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8,
2007) |
|
|
10.10 |
|
Pledge Agreement of Registrant dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.10 of the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.11 |
|
Sovereign Note dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the
Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
10.12 |
|
TD Banknorth Note dated August 2, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of
the Registrants Form 8-K filed on August 8, 2007) |
|
|
31.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1** |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
22
32.2** |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith |
|
** |
|
Indicates that the exhibit is being furnished with this report and is not filed as a part of it. |
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
MicroFinancial Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Richard F. Latour |
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ James R. Jackson Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 9, 2007
24