INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-32671
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
58-2555670 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer
Identification Number) |
2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(770) 857-4700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of
July 31, 2008, the number of shares of the registrants
Common Stock outstanding was 70,681,988 shares.
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2008
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
362,858 |
|
|
$ |
119,597 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
23,891 |
|
|
|
19,624 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
11,514 |
|
|
|
140,955 |
|
Customer accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $608
and $370 at June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
78,376 |
|
|
|
52,018 |
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
|
|
781,651 |
|
|
|
792,052 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
20,563 |
|
|
|
17,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,278,853 |
|
|
|
1,142,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
64,376 |
|
|
|
63,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,054,071 |
|
|
|
1,009,687 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
541,227 |
|
|
|
537,722 |
|
Cost method investments |
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
6,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
12,693 |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent assets |
|
|
1,652,829 |
|
|
|
1,590,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,996,058 |
|
|
$ |
2,796,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
30,980 |
|
|
$ |
27,811 |
|
Accrued salaries and benefits |
|
|
12,065 |
|
|
|
23,878 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
40,625 |
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
Current portion of licensing agreement |
|
|
11,549 |
|
|
|
10,572 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
22,093 |
|
|
|
11,687 |
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
|
|
781,651 |
|
|
|
792,052 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
13,532 |
|
|
|
7,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
912,495 |
|
|
|
910,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liability, net |
|
|
107,447 |
|
|
|
108,739 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
162,500 |
|
|
|
184,375 |
|
Noncurrent portion of licensing agreement |
|
|
86,681 |
|
|
|
89,645 |
|
Unearned government grant |
|
|
7,864 |
|
|
|
8,737 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
21,092 |
|
|
|
17,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
385,584 |
|
|
|
408,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,298,079 |
|
|
|
1,319,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000
shares authorized; no shares issued or
outstanding at June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 194,275
shares authorized; 71,585 and 70,963
shares issued at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively; 70,651
and 69,711 shares outstanding at June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 934 and 1,252
shares at June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively |
|
|
(56,008 |
) |
|
|
(30,188 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,115,349 |
|
|
|
1,043,971 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
608,862 |
|
|
|
431,708 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
29,060 |
|
|
|
30,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,697,979 |
|
|
|
1,476,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,996,058 |
|
|
$ |
2,796,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net |
|
$ |
344,096 |
|
|
$ |
226,713 |
|
|
$ |
166,664 |
|
|
$ |
117,372 |
|
Market data fees |
|
|
50,213 |
|
|
|
29,865 |
|
|
|
25,493 |
|
|
|
15,846 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,065 |
|
|
|
6,684 |
|
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
404,374 |
|
|
|
263,262 |
|
|
|
197,160 |
|
|
|
136,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
61,602 |
|
|
|
43,475 |
|
|
|
30,923 |
|
|
|
21,717 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
11,577 |
|
|
|
6,928 |
|
|
|
6,714 |
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
Patent royalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
30,017 |
|
|
|
25,132 |
|
|
|
15,680 |
|
|
|
13,002 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,790 |
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
10,844 |
|
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
127,309 |
|
|
|
107,090 |
|
|
|
64,375 |
|
|
|
60,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
277,065 |
|
|
|
156,172 |
|
|
|
132,785 |
|
|
|
76,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and investment income |
|
|
5,844 |
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,176 |
) |
|
|
(8,124 |
) |
|
|
(4,041 |
) |
|
|
(4,329 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
9,331 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net |
|
|
(3,007 |
) |
|
|
6,899 |
|
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
274,058 |
|
|
|
163,071 |
|
|
|
131,639 |
|
|
|
75,207 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
96,904 |
|
|
|
53,792 |
|
|
|
46,775 |
|
|
|
21,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
177,154 |
|
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
84,864 |
|
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
70,479 |
|
|
|
68,372 |
|
|
|
70,596 |
|
|
|
69,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
71,376 |
|
|
|
70,496 |
|
|
|
71,403 |
|
|
|
71,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) from |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
Available- |
|
Net |
|
Total |
|
|
Stock |
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Currency |
|
For-Sale |
|
Investment |
|
Shareholders' |
|
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
Shares |
|
Value |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Translation |
|
Securities |
|
Hedges |
|
Equity |
Balance, January 1, 2007 |
|
|
59,596 |
|
|
$ |
596 |
|
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,748 |
) |
|
$ |
245,030 |
|
|
$ |
191,179 |
|
|
$ |
29,863 |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,450 |
) |
|
$ |
454,468 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,183 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
Exercise of common stock options |
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
9,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,459 |
|
Issuance of shares for acquisitions |
|
|
10,303 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,663 |
|
Treasury shares received during acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
Treasury shares received for restricted
stock and stock option tax payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(24,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,814 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,415 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,089 |
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
70,963 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
(1,252 |
) |
|
|
(30,188 |
) |
|
|
1,043,971 |
|
|
|
431,708 |
|
|
|
33,046 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(2,450 |
) |
|
|
1,476,856 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
Exercise of common stock options |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
3,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,607 |
|
Issuance of shares for acquisitions |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,737 |
|
Treasury shares received for restricted
stock and stock option tax payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(41,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,989 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,162 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
16,394 |
|
|
|
(16,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,047 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
71,585 |
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
|
(934 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,008 |
) |
|
$ |
1,115,349 |
|
|
$ |
608,862 |
|
|
$ |
31,507 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
(2,450 |
) |
|
$ |
1,697,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
177,154 |
|
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
84,864 |
|
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Change in available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
175,559 |
|
|
$ |
109,337 |
|
|
$ |
85,294 |
|
|
$ |
53,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
177,154 |
|
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,790 |
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,267 |
) |
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
17,821 |
|
|
|
7,712 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
(1,741 |
) |
|
|
727 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(39,991 |
) |
|
|
(40,094 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
(26,498 |
) |
|
|
(15,895 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
(560 |
) |
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
|
|
(3,426 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
50,411 |
|
|
|
32,395 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued salaries and benefits, and other liabilities |
|
|
(5,515 |
) |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
14,398 |
|
|
|
(14,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
191,552 |
|
|
|
94,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(7,891 |
) |
|
|
(19,626 |
) |
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(7,177 |
) |
|
|
(5,337 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(29,612 |
) |
|
|
(392,120 |
) |
Purchase of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,454 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,269 |
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
223,940 |
|
|
|
144,851 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(100,592 |
) |
|
|
(174,650 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(8,291 |
) |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
70,377 |
|
|
|
(443,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Repayments of credit facilities |
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
|
|
(9,375 |
) |
Issuance costs for credit facilities |
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
(2,052 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
39,991 |
|
|
|
40,094 |
|
Payments relating to treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock
option tax payments |
|
|
(41,989 |
) |
|
|
(19,279 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options |
|
|
3,607 |
|
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(18,660 |
) |
|
|
264,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
243,261 |
|
|
|
(83,405 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
119,597 |
|
|
|
204,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
362,858 |
|
|
$ |
120,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
55,251 |
|
|
$ |
28,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
5,046 |
|
|
$ |
7,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental noncash investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisitions |
|
$ |
24,737 |
|
|
$ |
707,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
6
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
1. |
|
Nature of Business and Organization |
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (the Company) is a leading operator of global regulated
futures exchanges and over-the-counter (OTC) markets for commodities and derivative financial
products. The Company owns 100% of ICE Futures Europe, which operates as a United Kingdom (U.K.)
Recognized Investment Exchange for the purpose of price discovery, trading and risk management
within the energy commodity futures and options markets. The Company also owns 100% of ICE Futures
U.S., Inc. (ICE Futures U.S.), which operates as a United States (U.S.) Designated Contract
Market for the purpose of price discovery, trading and risk management within the soft commodity,
index and currency futures and options markets. The Company owns 100% of ICE Futures Canada, Inc.
(ICE Futures Canada), which operates as a Canadian Commodity Futures Exchange for the purpose of
price discovery, trading and risk management within the agricultural futures and options markets.
Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, the Company also has offices in London, New York, Chicago,
Houston, Calgary, Winnipeg and Singapore. The Company does not risk its own capital by engaging in
any trading activities or by extending credit to market participants.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding interim financial reporting.
Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information
and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements and should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007. The accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of the
Companys management, necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods
presented. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Preparing financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts that are reported in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are
based on managements best knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake
in the future, actual results may be different from the estimates. The results of operations for
the six months and three months ended June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected for any future period or the full fiscal year. The unaudited consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
balances and transactions between the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been
eliminated in consolidation.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, (SFAS No.
141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations. Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions.
SFAS No. 141(R) will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition related items
including expensing acquisition related costs as incurred, valuing non-controlling interests at
fair value at the acquisition date and expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired
business. SFAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS
No. 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after January 1, 2009. The Company expects SFAS No. 141(R) will have an impact on its
accounting for future business combinations once adopted but the extent of the impact is dependent
upon the size, complexity and number of acquisitions that are made in the future.
As a Recognized Investment Exchange, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the U.K.
requires ICE Futures Europe to restrict the use of the equivalent of six months of operating
expenditures in cash or cash
7
equivalents at all times. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, this amount was equal to
$12.1 million and $13.1 million, respectively, and is reflected as restricted cash in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company owns 100% of ICE Markets Limited, which is based in London and supports the
markets for European energy commodities, performs helpdesk functions and is authorized by the FSA
to act as an arranger of deals in investments. The FSA requires ICE Markets Limited to maintain a
minimum level of financial resources, which is calculated monthly on the basis of 25% of the
relevant annual expenditures, adjusted for any illiquid assets. As of June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, the resource requirement was equal to $1.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively, and is
reflected as restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
ICE Clear Europe has been formed by the Company to serve as a clearing house to perform
the clearing and settlement of each futures and options contract that will trade through ICE
Futures Europe and for all of the Companys cleared OTC products. ICE Clear Europe is expected to
begin clearing these contracts in September 2008 upon the transition of the clearing function from
LCH.Clearnet Ltd. ICE Clear Europe has been recognized by the FSA as a U.K. Recognized Clearing
House. As such, the FSA requires ICE Clear Europe to restrict the use of the equivalent of six
months of operating expenditures in cash or cash equivalents at all times. As of June 30, 2008, the
resource requirement was equal to $7.2 million and is reflected as restricted cash in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Consistent with the other clearing houses that the Company owns, ICE Clear Europe will require
that each clearing member make deposits in a fund known as the guaranty fund. The amounts in the
guaranty fund will serve to secure the obligations of a clearing member to ICE Clear Europe and may
be used to cover losses in excess of the margin and clearing firm accounts sustained by ICE Clear
Europe in the event of a default of a clearing member. ICE Clear Europe will commit $100.0 million
of its own cash as part of its guaranty fund. This contribution was made on July 3, 2008 and this
cash will subsequently be reflected as restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet. ICE Clear
U.S. and ICE Clear Canada do not contribute to their respective guaranty funds.
|
|
|
4. |
|
Short-Term and Long-Term Investments |
Investments consist of available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities are
carried at fair value using primarily quoted prices in active markets for identical securities,
with unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. As of June 30, 2008,
available-for-sale securities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Foreign government securities |
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
U.S. Treasury securities |
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,571 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
17,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contractual maturities of the investments as of June 30, 2008, were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
Maturities: |
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
|
$ |
4,658 |
|
Due within 1 year to 5 years |
|
|
1,491 |
|
Due within 5 years to 10 years |
|
|
200 |
|
Due after 10 years |
|
|
11,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments that the Company intends to hold for more than one year are classified as
long-term investments. The Company currently expects to hold $6.1 million of the investments for
more than one year and has classified them as
8
long-term investments in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008. The $6.1 million in long-term investments relates to auction rate securities that failed to settle at auction
during the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to recent events in the credit markets. The fair
values of these auction rate securities were determined based on level 3 unobservable inputs
supported by little or no market activity that are significant to the fair value of the assets. The
Company does not intend to hold any of the other investments for more than one year. Therefore, the
Company has classified the remaining $11.5 million as short-term investments in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2008.
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments with remaining maturities at
the purchase date of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Due to
the Companys decision to shift more of its funds into cash equivalent investments, the
available-for-sale short-term and long-term investments decreased from $141.0 million as of
December 31, 2007 to $17.6 million as of June 30, 2008. The decision to invest more in cash and
cash equivalent investments was primarily due to recent events in the credit markets, near term
acquisition requirements and the need to deposit $100.0 million in the ICE Clear Europe guaranty
fund in July 2008 (Note 3).
|
|
|
5. |
|
Cost Method Investments |
The Company has an 8% equity stake in the National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange, Ltd
(NCDEX), a derivatives exchange located in Mumbai, India, which it acquired for $37.0 million. In
response to political pressure regarding high commodity prices, the Indian government recently
suspended trading in several key contracts traded on NCDEX. It is not yet certain whether these
suspensions will be permanent, and if so, if other-than-temporary impairment will result. In
addition, the Company may be required to sell 3% of its 8% NCDEX stake as a result of a recent
change in Indian law that limits the total ownership by foreign entities in Indian exchanges to a
maximum of 5%. The Company currently believes there will be sufficient demand for its shares such
that it will at least recover its carrying value if it is required to sell the 3% stake. If the
Company cannot recover its carrying value, or if the suspended contracts lead to
other-than-temporary impairment, the Company will recognize an impairment loss equal to the
difference between the fair value and the carrying value of all of its 8% equity stake. The Company
also has a 1.4% equity share investment in LCH.Clearnet, a third party clearing house that
currently clears the Companys OTC and energy futures contracts. The Company uses the cost method
to account for these investments as the Company does not control and does not have the ability to
exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of these companies.
The following is a summary of the activity in the goodwill balance for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,009,687 |
|
Acquisition of YellowJacket |
|
|
46,834 |
|
Other activity |
|
|
(2,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,054,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company completed its acquisition of YellowJacket Software, Inc. (YellowJacket) on
February 13, 2008, which resulted in goodwill of $46.8 million (Note 10). The goodwill amount from
the YellowJacket acquisition has been included in the global OTC segment for purposes of segment
reporting and impairment testing. The other activity in the goodwill balance relates to adjustments
to the purchase price and related goodwill for acquisitions completed in 2007, primarily relating
to updated valuations of identified intangible assets, and to foreign currency translation
adjustments. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses on goodwill during the six months
or three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
The Company has a senior unsecured credit agreement under which a term loan facility in the
aggregate principal amount of $203.1 million is outstanding as of June 30, 2008, and a revolving
credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million (collectively, the Credit
Facilities). No amounts are outstanding under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2008.
Under the terms of the Credit Facilities, the Company may
9
borrow an aggregate principal amount of
up to $250.0 million under the revolving credit facility at any time until its termination on January 12, 2010. The Company has agreed to reserve $50.0 million of the $250.0
million available under the revolving credit facility for use by ICE Clear U.S., ICE Futures U.S.s
clearing organization, to provide short-term liquidity, if necessary, in the event of default by a
clearing participant. The remaining amount under the revolving credit facility can be used by the
Company for general corporate purposes.
Loans under the Credit Facilities shall, at the option of the Company, bear interest on the
principal amount outstanding at either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or (ii) a base
rate plus an applicable margin rate. The base rate will be equal to the higher of (i) Wachovia
Bank, National Associations (Wachovia) prime rate or (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The
applicable margin rate ranges from 0.50% to 1.125% on the LIBOR loans and from 0.00% to 0.125% for
the base rate loans based on the Companys total leverage ratio calculated on a trailing twelve
month period. Interest on each loan is payable quarterly. At June 30, 2008, the Company had a
$203.1 million three-month LIBOR loan outstanding with a stated interest rate of 3.30% per annum,
including the applicable margin rate at June 30, 2008 of 0.50% on the LIBOR loan. For the
borrowings under the term loan facility, the Company began making payments on June 30, 2007, and
will make payments quarterly thereafter until January 12, 2012, the fifth anniversary of the
closing date of the merger with ICE Futures U.S.
On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into a separate senior unsecured credit agreement (the
Credit Agreement) with Wachovia, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication
Agent, and the lenders named therein. The Credit Agreement provides for a 364-day revolving credit
facility in the aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million, which may be increased to $200.0
million under certain conditions. The Credit Agreement is available for operational use solely by
ICE Clear Europe, the Companys wholly-owned European clearing house. ICE Clear Europe expects to
begin clearing ICE Futures Europes contracts and the cleared OTC contacts during September 2008.
Loans under the Credit Agreement shall, at the option of the Company, bear interest on the
principal amount outstanding at either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or (ii) a base
rate plus an applicable margin rate. The base rate will be equal to the higher of (i) Wachovias
prime rate or (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin rate ranges from 1.50%
to 2.50% on the LIBOR loans and from 0.50% to 1.50% for the base rate loans based on the Companys
total leverage ratio calculated on a trailing twelve month period. No amounts are outstanding under
the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
8. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
The Company currently sponsors employee stock option and restricted stock plans. All stock
options are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the common stock on the date of
grant. The grant date fair value is based on the closing stock price on the date of grant. The fair
value of the stock options and restricted stock on the date of the grant is recognized as expense
over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. The non-cash compensation expenses
recognized in the Companys consolidated statements of income for the stock options and restricted
stock were $17.8 million and $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $9.9 million and $3.9 million for three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The following is a summary of stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Per Option |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,359,087 |
|
|
$ |
35.91 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(287,122 |
) |
|
|
13.16 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(25,533 |
) |
|
|
13.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
1,046,432 |
|
|
|
42.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Options |
|
Per Option |
|
(years) |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest |
|
|
1,006,015 |
|
|
$ |
39.11 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
81,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
773,513 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
72,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 was $37.7 million and $74.7 million, respectively, and was $14.5 million and $24.6 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of June 30, 2008, there were
$11.7 million in total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options. These costs are
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years as the stock options vest.
There are 309,913 restricted shares that have been reserved for potential issuance as
performance-based restricted shares for certain Company employees. These restricted shares are
subject to a market condition that may reduce the number of shares that are issued if the 2008
Company total shareholder return falls below that of the S&P 500 Index. The reduction in the number
of shares that could be issued if total shareholder return is below the return of the S&P 500 Index
could be up to a maximum of 20%. These shares were granted in December 2007 and vest over a
three-year period based on the Companys financial performance targets set by the Companys
compensation committee for the year ending December 31, 2008. The potential compensation expenses
to be recognized over the three-year vesting period under these performance-based restricted shares
range from $9.0 million to $44.9 million depending on which performance target is met in 2008.
Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company will recognize compensation costs, net of forfeitures, using an
accelerated amortization method over the vesting period for awards with performance conditions.
Compensation costs for such awards will be recognized only if it is probable that the condition
will be satisfied. As of March 31, 2008, the Company determined that it was probable that the
target performance level would be met and accrued at that level. As of June 30, 2008, the Company
determined that it was probable that a performance level between the target and above target
performance level will be met and the Company recorded non-cash compensation expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statement of income of $7.0 million and $4.5 million for the six months
and three months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, including a cumulative catch-up adjustment to
non-cash compensation expenses of $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The
remaining $15.9 million in non-cash compensation expenses will be expensed on an accelerated basis
over the remaining vesting period. The Company will recognize expense throughout 2008 based on the
Companys quarterly assessment of the probable 2008 actual performance as compared to the 2008
financial performance targets.
The following is a summary of the nonvested restricted shares for the six months ended June
30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
|
Restricted Shares |
|
|
Value per Share |
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
1,436,129 |
|
|
$ |
73.56 |
|
Granted |
|
|
37,723 |
|
|
|
137.96 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(789,832 |
) |
|
|
19.52 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(16,724 |
) |
|
|
92.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
667,296 |
|
|
|
131.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares in the table above include both time-based and performance-based grants.
Unvested performance-based restricted shares granted are presented in the table above at the
maximum number of restricted shares that would vest if the maximum performance targets are met. As
of June 30, 2008, there were $36.3 million in total unrecognized compensation costs related to the
time-based restricted shares and the performance-based restricted shares, net of estimated
forfeitures. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years
as the restricted shares vest. These unrecognized compensation costs assume that a performance
target level between the target and above target performance level will be met on the
performance-based restricted shares granted in December 2007. During the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, the total fair value of restricted stock vested under all restricted stock plans was
$127.4 million and $19.9 million, respectively.
The Companys effective tax rate increased to 35.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008
from 33.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and to 35.5% for the three months ended June 30,
2008 from 28.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The effective tax rate for the six months
and three months ended June 30, 2008 is higher than the federal statutory rate primarily due to
state taxes and non-deductible expenses, which are partially offset by favorable foreign income tax
rates, tax exempt interest income and tax credits. The effective tax rate for the
11
six months and
three months ended June 30, 2007 is lower than the federal statutory rate primarily due to a
decrease
in the amount of U.S taxes accrued on foreign earnings, tax exempt interest income and tax
credits, which are partially offset by state taxes and non-deductible expenses.
The undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiaries that have not been remitted
to the U.S. totaled $297.8 million and $209.5 million as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. These earnings are not subject to U.S. income tax until they are distributed to the
United States. Prior to 2007, the Company has provided for deferred U.S. federal income taxes on
these undistributed earnings in the accompanying consolidated statements of income as they were
determined not to be indefinitely reinvested. However, during 2007, the Company determined that all
prior undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries will be indefinitely reinvested outside
the United States. The Company made this determination on the basis of sufficient evidence that
demonstrates that it will invest the undistributed earnings overseas indefinitely. Determination of
the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability on the undistributed earnings of the
Companys foreign subsidiaries is not practicable.
The Company completed its acquisition of ICE Futures U.S. on January 12, 2007. As a part of
the acquisition of ICE Futures U.S., the Company formed a plan to restructure the ICE Futures U.S.
duplicative employee functions to align them with the Companys existing business functions and to
streamline ICE Futures U.S.s operations. Consequently, the Company included an accrual for
severance benefit costs of $14.4 million in the purchase price allocation to account for the
planned reduction in workforce. This amount and the related payments are set forth in the following
table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, January 12, 2007 |
|
$ |
11,040 |
|
Increase in reserve |
|
|
3,326 |
|
Cost applied against the reserve |
|
|
(11,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,605 |
|
Cost applied against the reserve |
|
|
(2,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
On February 13, 2008, the Company acquired YellowJacket for a combination of stock and cash.
YellowJacket is a financial technology firm that operates electronic trade negotiation technology
which offers a range of trading tools including instant communication, negotiation and data for
various financial markets. With the YellowJacket platform, traders can aggregate and consolidate
fragmented instant message-based communications and key transaction details on a single screen. The
acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business combination. The financial results of
YellowJacket have been included in the OTC business segment from the date of acquisition.
Under purchase accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets based on preliminary estimated fair values of these assets. The
purchase price allocation for the YellowJacket acquisition and for certain other acquisitions
completed in 2007 are preliminary and are subject to change during the allocation period. The
primary area of purchase price allocation that is not yet finalized for these acquisitions relates
to identified intangible assets.
The Company will make additional payments in cash or stock to certain former shareholders of
YellowJacket and former shareholders of certain other acquired companies if specified revenue
targets or certain other strategic goals specified in the purchase agreements for those acquired
companies are achieved. The maximum annual contingent payments that could be made in 2008, 2009 and
2010 are $14.0 million, $16.2 million and $79.2 million, respectively.
On June 3, 2008, the Company entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Creditex
Group, Inc. (Creditex) for a combination of stock and cash. Creditex is a market leader and
innovator in the execution and processing of credit default swaps (CDS) with markets spanning the
U.S., Europe and Asia. Creditex is a leader in the most liquid segments of the CDS market,
including indexes, single-names and standardized tranches. The transaction consideration will total
approximately $625 million, comprising approximately $565 million in the Companys common stock and
$60 million in cash, as well as a working capital adjustment to be finalized after the closing of
the transaction. Upon the closing of the transaction, estimated to occur in the third quarter of
2008,
12
Creditex will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The transaction has received FSA
approval, as well as
early termination of the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period, but remains subject to
U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority approval.
|
|
|
11. |
|
Clearing Organizations |
ICE Clear U.S. performs the clearing and settlement of every futures and options contract
traded through ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Clear Canada performs the same function for every futures
and options contract traded through ICE Futures Canada (ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear Canada are
referred to herein collectively as the ICE Clearing Houses). Each of the ICE Clearing Houses has
equal and offsetting claims to and from their respective clearing members on opposite sides of each
contract, standing as the counterparty on every contract cleared. Therefore, the Company does not
reflect these unsettled contracts as assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. However, to the extent that funds are not otherwise available to satisfy an
obligation under an applicable contract, the ICE Clearing Houses bear counterparty credit risk in
the event that future market movements create conditions that could lead to clearing members
failing to meet their obligations to the ICE Clearing Houses. The ICE Clearing Houses reduce their
exposure through a risk management program that includes initial and ongoing financial standards
for admission as a clearing member, original and variation margin requirements and mandatory
deposits to a guaranty fund (as described and defined below). The ICE Clearing Houses also have
powers of assessment that provide the ability to collect additional funds from their clearing
members to cover a defaulting members remaining obligations.
Each of the ICE Clearing Houses requires all clearing members to maintain on deposit with it
cash, money market mutual fund shares, U.S. Government obligations (with respect to ICE Clear
U.S.), Canadian Government obligations (with respect to ICE Clear Canada) or letters of credit to
secure payment of variation margin as may become due from the clearing members, and such deposits
in total are known as original margin. ICE Clear U.S. marks all outstanding futures contracts to
market at least twice daily and pays and collects option premiums daily. ICE Clear Canada marks all
outstanding positions to market once per day. The payments of profits and losses are known as
variation margin.
Each of the ICE Clearing Houses requires that each clearing member make deposits in a fund
known as a guaranty or clearing fund (Guaranty Fund), which is maintained by the relevant ICE
Clearing House. These amounts serve to secure the obligations of a clearing member to the ICE
Clearing House to which it has made the Guaranty Fund deposits and may be used to cover losses
sustained by the respective ICE Clearing House in the event of a default of a clearing member. All
income earned from investing clearing members cash deposits in the Guaranty Fund belongs to the
respective ICE Clearing House and is included in interest income in the accompanying consolidated
statements of income.
Should a particular clearing member fail to deposit original margin, or to make a variation
margin payment, when and as required, the relevant ICE Clearing House may liquidate the clearing
members open positions and use the clearing members original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits to
make up the amount owed. In the event that those deposits are not sufficient to pay that amount in
full, the ICE Clearing House may utilize the Guaranty Fund deposits of all clearing members for
that purpose. In addition, the relevant ICE Clearing House may assess its clearing members to meet
any remaining shortfall. As of June 30, 2008, original margin cash deposits, unsettled variation
margin cash deposits and Guaranty Fund cash deposits are as follows for ICE Clear U.S. and ICE
Clear Canada (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Clear U.S. |
|
|
ICE Clear Canada |
|
|
Total |
|
Original margin |
|
$ |
734,631 |
|
|
$ |
21,038 |
|
|
$ |
755,669 |
|
Variation margin |
|
|
10,485 |
|
|
|
4,983 |
|
|
|
15,468 |
|
Guaranty Fund |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
8,664 |
|
|
|
10,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
746,966 |
|
|
$ |
34,685 |
|
|
$ |
781,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recorded these cash deposits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
as current assets with offsetting current liabilities to the clearing members of the relevant ICE
Clearing House. All cash, securities and letters of credit are only available to meet the financial
obligations of that clearing firm to the relevant ICE Clearing House. ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear
Canada are separate legal entities and are not subject to the
13
liabilities of the other ICE Clearing
House or the obligations of the members of the other ICE Clearing House. These
cash deposits may fluctuate due to the investment choices available to clearing members and
the change in the amount of deposits required. As a result, these assets and offsetting liabilities
may vary significantly over time.
In addition to the cash original margin, variation margin, and Guaranty Fund deposits made to
the relevant ICE Clearing House, clearing members also pledge assets, including U.S. Government
obligations, Canadian Government obligations, money market mutual funds and letters of credit to
the relevant ICE Clearing House to mitigate its credit risk. These assets are held in safekeeping
and any interest and gain or loss accrues to the clearing member. These pledged assets are not
reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as the ICE Clearing Houses do not take
legal ownership of the assets. The ICE Clearing Houses have the ability to access the accounts
where these assets are held at the financial institutions and depositories in the event of a
clearing member default. The amount that the clearing members are required to maintain in the
original margin and Guaranty Fund accounts is determined by parameters established by the risk
management departments and the boards of directors of each of the ICE Clearing Houses and may
fluctuate over time.
As of June 30, 2008, the U.S. Government obligations and money market mutual funds pledged by
the clearing members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits for ICE Clear U.S. are detailed
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government |
|
|
Money |
|
|
|
Securities at |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Face Value |
|
|
Mutual Fund |
|
Original margin |
|
$ |
4,378,329 |
|
|
$ |
1,121,680 |
|
Guaranty Fund |
|
|
99,915 |
|
|
|
27,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,478,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,149,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008, the Canadian Government obligations and letters of credit pledged by the
clearing members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits for ICE Clear Canada are detailed
below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities at |
|
|
Letters |
|
|
|
Face Value |
|
|
Of Credit |
|
Original margin |
|
$ |
67,430 |
|
|
$ |
4,418 |
|
Guaranty Fund |
|
|
26,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93,611 |
|
|
$ |
4,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Clear U.S. and the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) have entered into a cross-margin
agreement, whereby a common clearing firm, or a pair of affiliated clearing firms, may maintain a
cross-margin account in which positions in certain of ICE Clear U.S.s futures and options are
combined with certain positions cleared by OCC for purposes of calculating margin requirements of
the clearing firms. The margin deposits will be held jointly by ICE Clear U.S. and OCC.
Cross-margin cash, securities and letters of credit jointly held with OCC under the cross-margin
agreement will be reflected at 50% of the total, or ICE Clear U.S.s proportionate share, in
accordance with the agreement. Clearing firms will maintain separate margin requirements with each
clearing house and depending on the impact resulting from offsetting positions between ICE Clear
U.S. and OCC; each clearing house may reduce that firms margin requirements. Cross margin deposits
will be held in a joint custody account controlled by ICE Clear U.S. and OCC. If a participating
firm defaults, the gain or loss on the liquidation of the firms open position and the proceeds
from the liquidation of the cross-margin account will be split 50% each to ICE Clear U.S. and OCC.
The cross-margining arrangement reduces capital costs for clearing firms and customers. The
agreement permits an individual clearing house to recognize a clearing firms open positions at
another participating clearing house, and clearing firms are able to offset risks of positions held
at one clearing house against those held at another participating clearing house. As of June 30,
2008, ICE Clear U.S. had established connectivity with participating banks. Activity under this
cross-margin agreement during the second quarter of 2008 was limited to the submission of a small
number of test transactions by a single firm.
14
|
|
|
12. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
Russell Licensing Agreement
On June 15, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive licensing agreement (the Licensing
Agreement) with the Frank Russell Company (Russell) to offer futures and options on futures
contracts based on the full range of Russells benchmark U.S. equity indexes. Due to the wind-down
provisions of existing Russell contracts, during the first year of the Licensing Agreement, the
Company has the ability to offer the Russell licenses on a non-exclusive basis. These rights will
become exclusive starting in the third quarter of 2008, and subject to achieving specified trading
volumes, will remain exclusive throughout the remainder of the Licensing Agreement, which extends
through June 2014.
In exchange for the license rights, the Company paid Russell $50.0 million in July 2007 and
will also make annual royalty payments based on the annual contract trade volumes, subject to
certain minimum annual royalty payments. The Company has recorded the license rights as intangible
assets, which were valued based on the net present value of all minimum annual royalty payments
that the Company is required to make to Russell throughout the term of the agreement. As of June
30, 2008, the assets related to the Licensing Agreement are $149.6 million and are included in
other intangible assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The intangible assets are
being amortized based on the Companys valuations of the non-exclusive and the exclusive elements
of the Licensing Agreement. For the six months and three months ended June 30, 2008, amortization
expense related to the Licensing Agreement was $83,000 and $42,000, respectively, which reflects
amortization on the non-exclusive portion of the intangible asset as the exclusive period has not
yet commenced.
Since the Company is required to make minimum annual royalty payments in order to maintain the
Russell license rights, the Company has also recorded a liability based on the net present value of
the total required payments as of the effective date of the Licensing Agreement. As of June 30,
2008, the current and noncurrent liabilities relating to the minimum annual royalty payments under
the Licensing Agreement are $11.5 million and $86.7 million, respectively, and are reflected as
licensing agreement liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The difference
between the present value of the payments and the actual payments is recorded as interest expense
using the effective interest method over the term of the Licensing Agreement. For the six months
and three months ended June 30, 2008, interest expense related to the Licensing Agreement was $3.0
million and $1.5 million, respectively.
Legal Proceedings
On April 6, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, granted ICE
Futures U.S.s motion to dismiss all claims brought against it in an action commenced on December
8, 2006 by certain holders of non-equity trading permits (Permit Holders) of ICE Futures U.S. The
plaintiffs alleged that, in violation of purported contract rights and/or rights under New Yorks
Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, ICE Futures U.S. had not allowed its Permit Holders, including
plaintiffs, to vote on the merger pursuant to which the Company acquired ICE Futures U.S. and had
improperly denied the Permit Holders a portion of the merger consideration. Plaintiffs sought (i)
to enjoin consummation of the merger, (ii) declaratory relief regarding their past and future
rights as Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of unspecified damages on claims for breach of
fiduciary duty, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, estoppel and fraud. In addition to
dismissing its claims, the court also denied the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction.
On February 4, 2008, the Permit Holders appealed the lower courts ruling dismissing their
complaint but did not pursue an appeal of the lower courts denial of their request for an order
enjoining the merger. The appeal was denied in its entirety by the appellate court in a decision
issued on June 24, 2008. The Permit Holders may only appeal that decision with the express
authorization of the appeals court. The time within which the Permit Holders may seek such
authorization has not expired.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business. However, the Company does not believe that the resolution of these matters, including
those specifically discussed above, will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. It is possible, however,
that future results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially
and adversely affected by any new developments relating to the legal proceedings and claims.
15
In August 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with a third-party to sell ICE Futures
Europes former open-outcry disaster recovery site in London. Prior to the closure of ICE Futures
Europes open-outcry floor in London during April 2005, the building on this site was used as a
backup open-outcry trading facility. The sale was completed in February 2007, at which time final
payment was received and a net gain on disposal of an asset of $9.3 million was recognized as other
income in the accompanying consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
|
14. |
|
CBOT Merger-Related Transaction Costs |
The Company incurred incremental direct merger-related transaction costs of $10.9 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2007 relating to the proposed merger with CBOT Holdings, Inc.
(CBOT), including $3.3 million in costs that were incurred during the three months ended March
31, 2007 and which were capitalized as of March 31, 2007. The Company did not succeed in its
proposed merger with CBOT, and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings, Inc. completed its
acquisition of CBOT on July 13, 2007. The $10.9 million in merger-related transaction costs
includes investment banking advisors, legal, accounting, proxy advisor, public relations services
and other external costs directly related to the proposed transaction. These costs have been
recorded as CBOT merger-related transaction costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007.
The Companys principal business segments consist of its global OTC segment, its futures
segment and its market data segment. The operations of ICE Futures Europe, ICE Futures U.S. and ICE
Futures Canada make up the futures segment and the operations of ICE Data make up the market data
segment. The remaining companies have been included in the global OTC segment as they primarily
support the Companys OTC business operations. In the prior quarters in 2007 only, the Company
reported four business segments; its global OTC segment, its U.K. futures segment, its U.S. futures
segment, which included ICE Futures Canada since its acquisition in August 2007, and its market
data segment. As of December 31, 2007, the Company combined the U.K futures segment and the U.S.
futures segment into one futures segment in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, as this is how it was reported internally and
provided to the Companys chief operating decision maker. Prior quarter amounts have been
reclassified to conform to the current quarters business segment presentation. Intersegment
revenues and transactions attributable to the performance of services are recorded at cost plus an
agreed market percentage intercompany profit. Intersegment revenues attributable to licensing
transactions have been priced in accordance with comparable third party agreements. Financial data
for the Companys business segments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
|
Futures |
|
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
186,255 |
|
|
$ |
191,024 |
|
|
$ |
27,095 |
|
|
$ |
404,374 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
16,129 |
|
|
|
34,104 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,387 |
|
|
|
3,353 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
21,790 |
|
Interest and investment income |
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
3,425 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
6,004 |
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,176 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
34,284 |
|
|
|
49,699 |
|
|
|
12,921 |
|
|
|
96,904 |
|
Net income |
|
|
67,493 |
|
|
|
83,229 |
|
|
|
26,432 |
|
|
|
177,154 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,746,488 |
|
|
|
1,219,185 |
|
|
|
30,385 |
|
|
|
2,996,058 |
|
Revenues from three clearing members of the futures segment comprised 15.6%, 13.3% and 12.2%
of the Companys futures revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008. These clearing members
are primarily intermediaries and represent a broad range of principal trading firms. If the
clearing member ceased doing business, the Company believes that the trading firms would continue
to conduct transactions through the Company and would clear those transactions through a different
clearing member. No additional members or customers accounted
16
for more than 10% of the Companys segment revenues or consolidated revenues during the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
|
Futures |
|
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers. |
|
$ |
105,351 |
|
|
$ |
138,220 |
|
|
$ |
19,691 |
|
|
$ |
263,262 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
17,281 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
7,122 |
|
|
|
26,240 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,565 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
Interest and investment income |
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
2,701 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
13,756 |
|
|
|
31,311 |
|
|
|
8,725 |
|
|
|
53,792 |
|
Net income |
|
|
32,880 |
|
|
|
61,799 |
|
|
|
14,600 |
|
|
|
109,279 |
|
Revenues from three clearing members of the futures segment comprised 13.3%, 12.2% and 10.7%
of the Companys futures revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007. These clearing members
are primarily intermediaries and represent a broad range of principal trading firms. If the
clearing member ceased doing business, the Company believes that the trading firms would continue
to conduct transactions through the Company and would clear those transactions through a different
clearing member. No additional members or customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys
segment revenues or consolidated revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
|
Futures |
|
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
92,907 |
|
|
$ |
90,374 |
|
|
$ |
13,879 |
|
|
$ |
197,160 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
7,776 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
8,068 |
|
|
|
17,112 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,380 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
10,844 |
|
Interest and investment income |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,041 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
18,067 |
|
|
|
22,332 |
|
|
|
6,376 |
|
|
|
46,775 |
|
Net income |
|
|
32,151 |
|
|
|
39,196 |
|
|
|
13,517 |
|
|
|
84,864 |
|
Revenues from three clearing members of the futures segment comprised 16.0%, 13.6% and 13.3%
of the Companys futures revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008. These clearing members
are primarily intermediaries and represent a broad range of principal trading firms. If the
clearing member ceased doing business, the Company believes that the trading firms would continue
to conduct transactions through the Company and would clear those transactions through a different
clearing member. No additional members or customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys
segment revenues or consolidated revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
|
Futures |
|
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
52,583 |
|
|
$ |
73,528 |
|
|
$ |
10,543 |
|
|
$ |
136,654 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
12,070 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,101 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7,748 |
|
Interest and investment income |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,329 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
14,413 |
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
|
|
21,514 |
|
Net income |
|
|
13,809 |
|
|
|
31,796 |
|
|
|
8,088 |
|
|
|
53,693 |
|
Revenues from three clearing members of the futures segment comprised 12.4%, 11.5% and 10.4%
of the Companys futures revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007. These clearing members
are primarily
17
intermediaries and represent a broad range of principal trading firms. If the clearing member
ceased doing business, the Company believes that the trading firms would continue to conduct
transactions through the Company and would clear those transactions through a different clearing
member. No additional members or customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys segment
revenues or consolidated revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
|
16. |
|
Earnings Per Common Share |
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per common share computations for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
177,154 |
|
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
84,864 |
|
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
70,479 |
|
|
|
68,372 |
|
|
|
70,596 |
|
|
|
69,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
70,479 |
|
|
|
68,372 |
|
|
|
70,596 |
|
|
|
69,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted shares |
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
71,376 |
|
|
|
70,496 |
|
|
|
71,403 |
|
|
|
71,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares from stock options and restricted stock
awards, using the treasury stock method, are also included in the diluted per share calculations
unless their effect of inclusion would be antidilutive.
18
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the sections entitled Legal Proceedings,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Risk
Factors, contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 that are based on our present beliefs and assumptions and on information
currently available to us. You can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as
may, will, should, could, would, targets, goal, expect, intend, plan,
anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential, continue, or the negative of these
terms or other comparable terminology. These statements relate to future events or our future
financial performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include those set
forth under the heading Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007 and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Forward-looking statements and other risks and factors that may affect our performance
include, but are not limited to: our business environment; increasing competition and consolidation
in our industry; changes in domestic and foreign regulations or government policy; technological
developments, including clearing developments; our initiative to establish a European clearing
house and our global clearing strategy; the accuracy of our cost estimates and expectations,
adjustments to exchange fees or commission rates; our belief that cash flows will be sufficient to
fund our working capital needs and capital expenditures at least through the end of 2009; our
ability to increase the connectivity to our marketplace; our ability to develop new products and
services and pursue strategic acquisitions and alliances on a timely, cost-effective basis;
maintaining existing market participants and attracting new ones; protecting our intellectual
property rights and our ability to not violate the intellectual property rights of others; adverse
litigation results; our belief in our electronic platform and disaster recovery system technologies
and the ability to gain access to comparable products and services if our key technology contracts
were terminated; and the risk that acquired businesses will not be integrated successfully or the
revenue opportunities, cost savings and other anticipated synergies from the mergers may not be
fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected. We caution you not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements as they speak only as of the date on which such
statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to
reflect the occurrence of an unanticipated event. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is
not possible for management to predict all factors that may affect our business and prospects.
Further, management cannot assess the impact of each factor on the business or the extent to which
any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those
contained in any forward-looking statements.
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise indicated, the terms
IntercontinentalExchange, ICE, we, us, our, our company and our business refer to
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries. Due to rounding,
figures may not sum exactly.
Overview and Our Business Environment
We are a leading global exchange and over-the-counter, or OTC, market operator. We operate the
leading electronic integrated futures and OTC marketplace for trading a broad array of energy
products, as well as a leading soft commodities exchange. Currently, we are the only marketplace to
offer an integrated electronic platform for side-by-side trading of products in both futures and
OTC markets. Through our widely-distributed electronic trading platform, our marketplace brings
together buyers and sellers of derivative and physical commodities and financial contracts. We
conduct our regulated U.K. futures markets through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures Europe.
We conduct our regulated U.S. futures markets through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures U.S.
We conduct our regulated Canadian futures markets through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures
Canada. ICE Futures U.S. has a wholly-owned clearing house subsidiary called ICE Clear U.S. and ICE
Futures Canada has a wholly-owned clearing house subsidiary called ICE Clear Canada. We completed
our acquisition of ICE Futures U.S. on January 12, 2007 and our acquisition of ICE Futures Canada
on August 27, 2007.
We operate three business segments: a futures segment, a global OTC segment and a market data
segment. In our futures markets, we offer trading in standardized derivative contracts on our
regulated exchanges. In our OTC markets, we offer trading in over-the-counter, or off-exchange,
derivative contracts, including contracts that provide
19
for the physical delivery of an underlying commodity or for financial settlement based on the
price of an underlying commodity. Through our market data segment, we offer a variety of market
data services and products for both futures and OTC market participants and observers.
Our business is primarily transaction based, and our revenues and profitability relate
directly to the level of trading activity in our markets. Trading volumes are driven by a number of
factors, including the degree of volatility in commodities prices. Price volatility increases the
need to hedge contractual price risk and creates opportunities for the exchange of risk between
market participants. Changes in our futures trading volumes and OTC average daily commissions have
also been driven by varying levels of liquidity and volatility both in our markets and in the
broader commodities markets, which influence trading volumes across all of the markets we operate.
We operate our futures and OTC markets primarily on our electronic platform and we offer ICE
Futures U.S.s soft commodity options markets on both our electronic platform and through our
trading floor based in New York. In February 2008, we closed our futures open-outcry trading floors
in New York and Dublin and now only offer soft commodity options markets through the open-outcry
trading floor in New York. We believe that the move toward electronic trade execution, together
with the improved accessibility for new market participants and the increased adoption of
commodities as a tradable, investable asset class, has contributed to and will likely support
continued secular growth in the global markets. As participation continues to increase and as
participants continue to employ more sophisticated financial instruments and risk management
strategies to manage their price exposure, we believe there remains opportunity for further growth
in derivatives trading on a global basis. We do not risk our own capital by engaging in any trading
activities.
On June 3, 2008, we entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Creditex Group,
Inc., or Creditex, for a combination of stock and cash. Creditex is a market leader and innovator
in the execution and processing of credit default swaps, or CDS, with markets spanning the U.S.,
Europe and Asia. Creditex is a leader in the most liquid segments of the CDS market, including
indexes, single-names and standardized tranches. The transaction consideration will total
approximately $625 million, comprising approximately $565 million in our common stock and $60
million in cash, as well as a working capital adjustment to be finalized after the closing of the
transaction. Upon the closing of the transaction, estimated to occur in the third quarter of 2008,
Creditex will be our wholly-owned subsidiary. The transaction has received U.K. Financial Services
Authority, or FSA, approval and early termination of the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting
period, but still requires U.S. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority approval.
Financial Highlights
|
|
Consolidated revenues increased by 53.6% to $404.4 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to increased contract volumes in
our futures and OTC markets resulting from increased volatility, organic growth and
acquisitions. |
|
|
|
Consolidated operating expenses increased by 18.9% to $127.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to acquisitions,
higher cash and non-cash compensation costs, costs associated with the establishment of ICE
Clear Europe, the closure of our futures trading floors in New York and Dublin and increased
technology spending and related depreciation expenses, partially offset by CBOT Holdings,
Inc., or CBOT, merger-related transaction costs incurred during the six months ended June 30,
2007. |
|
|
|
Consolidated operating margin increased to 68.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008,
compared to 59.3% for the same period in 2007. |
|
|
|
Consolidated net income increased by 62.1% to $177.2 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008, compared to the same period in 2007. |
On a consolidated basis, we recorded $404.4 million in revenues for the six months ended June
30, 2008, a 53.6% increase compared to $263.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Consolidated net income was $177.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a 62.1% increase
compared to $109.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The financial results for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 include $2.1 million in
20
costs associated with the closure of ICE Futures U.S.s futures trading floors. The financial
results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 include a gain of $9.3 million relating to the sale
of our former open-outcry disaster recovery site in London and $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related
transaction costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, 120.6 million contracts were traded
in our futures markets, up 29.5% from 93.2 million contracts traded during the six months ended
June 30, 2007. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, 135.6 million contract equivalents were
traded in our OTC markets, up 71.5% from 79.1 million contract equivalents traded during the six
months ended June 30, 2007.
On a consolidated basis, we recorded $197.2 million in revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, a 44.3% increase compared to $136.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2007. Consolidated net income was $84.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, a 58.1%
increase compared to $53.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The financial results
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 include $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related transaction
costs. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, 58.1 million contracts were traded in our
futures markets, up 20.8% from 48.1 million contracts traded during the three months ended June 30,
2007. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, 68.1 million contract equivalents were traded in
our OTC markets, up 76.2% from 38.7 million contract equivalents traded during the three months
ended June 30, 2007.
Global Clearing Strategy
We have previously announced our intention to establish ICE Clear Europe, a clearing house
based in London, as part of our strategic plan to offer clearing services through our wholly-owned
clearing businesses in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. Clearing services for our U.K. energy futures
and cleared OTC businesses are currently outsourced to LCH.Clearnet Ltd., or LCH, a third party
U.K. clearing house. We provide our clearing services in the U.S. for all ICE Futures U.S.
contracts through ICE Clear U.S., and in Canada for all ICE Futures Canada contracts through ICE
Clear Canada.
To date, we have completed significant elements of our plan to establish ICE Clear Europe,
including the completion of major technology development and successful testing with clearing
firms. We believe that gaining greater control over this core clearing process will allow us to
introduce more products and services to the futures and OTC markets for broker-dealers and for our
customers, as well as ensure technology and operational service levels meet the efficiency
standards that we have set within our execution business. We also believe that this flexibility
will allow us to increase our speed-to-market for new cleared products and to expand our products
further into physically-delivered commodity products on a competitive basis with other derivatives
exchanges that manage their own clearing and risk management services. Finally, it is our objective
to provide a clearing model that benefits customers and clearing firms alike, through technological
innovation, offering a competitive alternative for clearing for new products and new exchanges,
competitive pricing, greater profit participation by member firms and new value-added services.
Longer term, we anticipate that collectively, our European, Canadian and U.S. clearing houses may
partner to serve our global customer base across the commodities and financial products
marketplace, in an innovative and capital efficient manner. Our clearing strategy is designed to
complement our diverse markets while meeting the risk management, capital and regulatory
requirements of an expanding global marketplace.
ICE Clear Europe received recognition from the FSA as a U.K. Recognized Clearing House in May
2008, following HM Treasury approval and an Office of Fair Trading review. Since its recognition by
the FSA, ICE Clear Europe has received membership applications from 47 clearing firms and has
received written commitments for the transfer of 100% of the open positions established at ICE
Futures Europe and ICE OTC from LCH to ICE Clear Europe effective at the transition date.
While transition was originally scheduled to occur in July 2008, under a revised technical
framework agreed to with LCH, we now expect the transition of clearing to ICE Clear Europe to occur
during September 2008. The existing futures and OTC clearing arrangements between us and LCH are
expected to remain in effect until the transition is complete.
Regulation
Providing facilities to trade energy products is one of our core businesses. Recently, given
the high price of energy commodities, the U.S. Congress has held numerous hearings regarding the
proper regulation of energy
21
trading and, in particular, the potential impact of speculation on energy prices. Currently,
numerous bills are pending before the U.S. Congress addressing regulation of trading within the
energy markets and additional bills may be introduced. The passage of certain bills could
negatively impact our business by limiting the amount of trading that is conducted in our markets.
We currently operate our OTC electronic platform as an exempt commercial market under the
Commodity Exchange Act, or CEA, and regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or the
CFTC. The CFTC generally oversees, but does not currently substantively regulate, the trading of
OTC derivative contracts on our platform. Each of our participants must qualify as an eligible
commercial entity, as defined by the CEA, and each participant must trade for its own account, as a
principal. As an exempt commercial market, we are required to comply with access, reporting and
record-keeping requirements of the CFTC. In May 2008, the U.S. Congress passed legislation in the
Farm Bill that subjects certain of our OTC contracts that are deemed by the CFTC to perform a
significant price discovery function (which is defined as a contract (i) that is linked to a
contract traded on a designated contract market and which trades with sufficient volume to affect
the designated contract markets contract or (ii) an electronically traded OTC contract that trades
with sufficient volume to be an independent price reference) to additional regulation. As a result,
we will plan to adopt futures exchange style regulation for at least one of our OTC contracts, the
Henry Hub natural gas swap, and possibly other OTC contracts based upon future findings by the
CFTC. This additional regulation will require us to (i) adopt trading rules in such markets, (ii)
actively monitor trading in such markets, (iii) impose position limits or position accountability
levels for trading in such contracts, and (iv) exercise emergency authority in the markets where
appropriate. In addition, we will be required to produce large trader reports for significant price
discovery contracts, which we currently provide with respect to our Henry Hub contract pursuant to
an existing special call by the CFTC.
Some of the above referenced proposed bills before the U.S. Congress would affect our OTC
business, including (i) eliminating our ability, or altering the requirements, to operate as an
exempt commercial market, (ii) requiring that we operate our business as a regulated futures
exchange that operates as a self regulatory organization, (iii) requiring certain participants on
exempt commercial markets to file reports on their positions, and (iv) prohibiting energy traders
from entering trades unless the traders could prove that they could take delivery of the commodity.
In the United Kingdom, we engage in a variety of activities related to our business through
subsidiary entities that are subject to supervision by the FSA. ICE Futures Europe is recognized as
an investment exchange and self-regulatory organization by the FSA in accordance with the Financial
Services and Markets Act 2000, or FSMA. As such, ICE Futures Europe maintains front-line regulatory
responsibility for its markets and is subject to regulatory oversight by the FSA. To retain its
status as a recognized investment exchange, ICE Futures Europe is required to dedicate sufficient
resources to its regulatory functions and to meet various regulatory requirements relating to
sufficiency of financial resources, adequacy of systems and controls and effectiveness of
arrangements for monitoring and disciplining its members. Failure to comply with these requirements
could subject ICE Futures Europe to significant penalties, including de-recognition. ICE Futures
Europe has direct electronic access in the U.S. through no action relief from the CFTC. Several
bills currently pending before the U.S. Congress would modify or eliminate this no action relief
and force ICE Futures Europe to register with the CFTC as a Designated Contract Market for any
energy products with a U.S. delivery point or for any contract that references the settlement price
of a U.S. designated contract market, such as ICE Futures Europes West Texas Intermediate, or WTI,
crude oil contract. Other bills would require ICE Futures Europe to adopt U.S. regulation of its
energy contracts with U.S. delivery points or that references the settlement price of a U.S.
designated contract market. In addition, one proposed bill in the U.S. Congress could require ICE
Futures Europe to place lower position limits on energy contracts linked to settlement prices of a
U.S. designated contract market than the U.S. designated contract market itself imposes.
In June 2008, the CFTC modified ICE Futures Europes screen based no action letter to
require ICE Futures Europe to adopt position limits and position accountability levels for its
energy contracts for products with U.S. delivery points or which reference the settlement price of
a U.S. designated contract market. The modified no action letter is subject to approval by the
FSA. The modification to the no action letter will also require ICE Futures Europe to provide
additional trading information to the CFTC to permit the CFTC to incorporate such information into
its large trader reporting system. The products impacted include ICE Futures Europes WTI crude oil
contract, its RBOB gasoline contract, and its New York Harbor heating oil contract. ICE Futures has
until October 15, 2008 to comply with the revised terms of its no action letter. Further, in July
2008, the U.K.s Treasury Select Committee held a hearing regarding the potential impact of
speculation on energy prices in both ICE Futures
22
Europes on-exchange market and the U.K.s OTC market. This included consideration of the
CFTCs amendment of ICE Futures Europes no action letter. While no change to legislation or
regulation in the United Kingdom is currently proposed, it is possible that the regulatory
environment in the United Kingdom for exchange traded energy commodities could change.
Other legislative proposals target futures and OTC market participants. The legislative
proposals include (i) placing aggregated position limits and accountability levels on traders
across all exchanges and markets, (ii) limiting participation in energy markets by index funds,
(iii) limiting participation in energy markets by swaps dealers, (iv) removing or curtailing the
issuance of hedge exemptions from position limits, and (iv) increasing margins for futures market
participants. Further, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 has given the Federal Trade
Commission, or FTC, additional authority to investigate and prosecute manipulation in the petroleum
markets. In May 2008, the FTC released an advance notice of proposed rulemaking asking the public
whether it should exercise its powers in the petroleum futures markets.
If any of the above referenced bills are adopted, they could restrict or foreclose some
portions of our business, require us and our participants to operate under heightened regulatory
requirements and incur additional costs to comply with new or additional regulations, and could
prevent or deter some participants from trading in our markets. We cannot predict whether any of
the above bills, some combination of the above bills or new bills will be adopted. If these bills
or similar legislation were to be enacted into law, it could have an adverse effect on our
business.
Variability in Quarterly Comparisons
In addition to general conditions in the financial markets and in the commodities markets in
particular, trading is subject to variability in trading volumes due to a number of key factors.
These factors include geopolitical events, weather, real and perceived supply and demand
imbalances, regulatory considerations, availability of capital, the number of trading days in a
period and seasonality. These and other factors could cause our revenues to fluctuate from quarter
to quarter. These fluctuations may affect the reliability of quarter to quarter comparisons of our
revenues and operating results when, for example, these comparisons are between quarters in
different seasons. Inter-seasonal comparisons will not necessarily be indicative of our results for
future periods.
Segment Reporting
For financial reporting purposes, our business is currently divided into three segments: our
futures segment, our global OTC segment and our market data segment. In the prior quarters in 2007,
we reported four segments, including a U.K. futures segment and a U.S. futures segment, which
included ICE Futures Canada since its acquisition in August 2007. We have combined our U.K. futures
segment and our U.S. futures segment into one futures segment to better reflect the manner in which
management assesses the performance of the business. For a discussion of these segments and related
financial disclosure, refer to Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Intersegment Fees
Our global OTC segment provides and supports the platform for electronic trading in our
futures segment. Intersegment fees include charges for developing, operating, managing and
supporting the platform for electronic trading in our futures segment. Our futures segment and our
global OTC segment provide trading information to our market data segment. Our market data segment
provides marketing and other promotional services to our global OTC segment. We determine the
intercompany or intersegment fees to be paid by the business segments based on transfer pricing
standards and independent documentation. These intersegment fees have no impact on our consolidated
operating results. We expect the structure of these intersegment fees to remain unchanged and
expect that they will continue to have no impact on our consolidated operating results.
23
Our Futures Segment
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected statement of income data in
dollars and as a percentage of revenues for our futures segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures |
|
$ |
46,918 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
$ |
43,917 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
% |
ICE WTI Crude futures |
|
|
25,752 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
24,559 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
ICE Gas Oil futures |
|
|
20,461 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
16,240 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Sugar futures and options |
|
|
47,739 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
23,658 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Cotton futures and options |
|
|
15,578 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8,008 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Other futures products and options |
|
|
28,027 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
16,478 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Intersegment fees |
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,549 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
193,403 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
140,057 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1)(2) |
|
|
42,848 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
39,792 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
14,870 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
16,375 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,353 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2,687 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
61,071 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
58,854 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
132,332 |
|
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
81,203 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
Other income, net(3) |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
11,907 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
49,699 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
31,311 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
83,229 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
$ |
61,799 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional services expenses. |
|
(2) |
|
The financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2008 include $2.1
million in costs associated with the closure of ICE Futures U.S.s futures
trading floors, including $1.7 million in compensation expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
The financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2008 include $3.0
million in interest expense relating to the Russell Licensing Agreement. The
financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 include a net gain on
disposal of an asset of $9.3 million. Refer to Notes 12 and 13 to our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information on these two items. |
Transaction fees are presented net of rebates. We recorded rebates in our futures segment of
$32.1 million and $12.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase in the rebates is due primarily to an increase in the amount of rebates offered on the ICE
WTI Crude futures contract resulting from higher contract volumes trading during the period. We
offer rebates in certain of our markets primarily to help generate market liquidity and trading
volumes by providing customers trading in those markets a full or partial discount to the
applicable commission rate.
In addition to our transaction fees, a futures participant must currently pay a clearing
transaction fee to the clearing house for the benefit of clearing and another for the services of
the relevant member clearing firm, or FCM. For ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada, our
transaction fees include both a trading and a clearing fee as we own 100% of ICE Clear U.S. and ICE
Clear Canada. However, consistent with our cleared OTC business, we currently do not derive any
direct revenues from the clearing process associated with ICE Futures Europe and participants pay
the clearing fees directly to LCH. However, upon the launch of ICE Clear Europe in September 2008,
we expect to capture clearing revenues associated with our ICE Futures Europe business, the amount
of which will depend upon many considerations, including but not limited to, attracting members to
our clearing house, transaction volume, pricing and new products.
A contract is a standardized quantity of the physical commodity underlying each futures
contract. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, trading activity in our futures
markets by commodity type based on the total number of contracts traded:
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Number of futures and option contracts traded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures |
|
|
34,954 |
|
|
|
29,563 |
|
|
|
18,214 |
|
|
|
14,637 |
|
ICE WTI Crude futures |
|
|
27,828 |
|
|
|
24,985 |
|
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
12,181 |
|
ICE Gas Oil futures |
|
|
13,772 |
|
|
|
10,969 |
|
|
|
6,489 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
Sugar futures and options(1) |
|
|
22,849 |
|
|
|
13,770 |
|
|
|
9,981 |
|
|
|
8,129 |
|
Cotton futures and options(1) |
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
4,569 |
|
|
|
2,707 |
|
|
|
2,799 |
|
Other futures and options(2) |
|
|
13,990 |
|
|
|
9,310 |
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
4,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
120,630 |
|
|
|
93,166 |
|
|
|
58,101 |
|
|
|
48,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Sugar and cotton futures and options contracts began trading on
January 12, 2007 in connection with the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. |
|
(2) |
|
The increase in the number of other futures and options contracts
traded primarily relates to the increase in trading of futures and
options contracts on coffee and cocoa, which began trading on January
12, 2007 in connection with the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. |
The following chart presents the futures transaction fee revenues by contract traded in our
futures markets for the periods presented:
The following table presents our average daily open interest for our futures and options
contracts. Open interest is the number of contracts (long or short) that a member holds either for
its own account or on behalf of its clients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Open Interest
futures and option
contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
ICE WTI Crude futures |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
ICE Gas Oil futures |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
Sugar futures and options |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
Cotton futures and options |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
Coffee futures and options |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
Cocoa futures and options |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Other futures and options |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,464 |
|
|
|
4,367 |
|
|
|
5,374 |
|
|
|
4,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Our Global OTC Segment
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected statement of income data in
dollars and as a percentage of revenues for our global OTC segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas |
|
$ |
117,748 |
|
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
$ |
70,458 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
% |
North American power |
|
|
31,859 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
18,510 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
Other commodities markets |
|
|
6,020 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Electronic trade confirmation |
|
|
3,994 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Intersegment fees |
|
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
17,281 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Market data fees |
|
|
23,140 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
10,174 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
201,851 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
122,632 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
|
61,415 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
|
|
41,112 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
16,366 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
7,171 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
18,387 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
11,565 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
96,168 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
|
70,792 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
105,683 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
51,840 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(5,204 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
34,284 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
13,756 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
67,493 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
% |
|
$ |
32,880 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional services expenses. |
|
(2) |
|
The financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 include $10.9
million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs. Refer to Note 14 to our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information on this item. |
Transaction fees are presented net of rebates. We recorded rebates in our global OTC segment
of $8.0 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Revenues in our global OTC segment are generated primarily through transaction fees earned from
trades. While we charge a monthly data access fee for access to our electronic platform, we derive
a substantial portion of our OTC revenues from transaction fees paid by participants for each trade
that they execute based on the underlying commodity volume.
In addition to our transaction fees, a participant that chooses to clear an OTC trade must
currently pay a fee to LCH for the benefit of clearing and another for the services of the relevant
FCM. Consistent with our ICE Futures Europe business, we currently do not derive any direct
revenues from the OTC clearing process and participants pay the clearing fees directly to LCH.
However, upon the launch of ICE Clear Europe in September 2008, we expect to capture clearing
revenues associated with our global OTC segment, the amount of which will depend upon many
considerations, including attracting members to our clearing house, transaction volume, pricing and
new products. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, transaction fees related to cleared
trades represented 71.9% and 71.4% of our total OTC revenues, respectively, net of intersegment
fees. We intend to continue to support the introduction of these products in response to the
requirements of our participants.
26
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the total volume of the underlying
commodity and number of contracts traded in our OTC markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Volume OTC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas (in million
British thermal units, or MMBtu) |
|
|
313,037 |
|
|
|
177,814 |
|
|
|
156,934 |
|
|
|
85,896 |
|
North American power (in megawatt hours) |
|
|
3,622 |
|
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
Global oil (in equivalent barrels of oil) |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of OTC contracts traded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas |
|
|
125,215 |
|
|
|
71,130 |
|
|
|
62,773 |
|
|
|
34,358 |
|
North American power |
|
|
5,607 |
|
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
2,801 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
Global oil and other |
|
|
4,806 |
|
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
135,628 |
|
|
|
79,074 |
|
|
|
68,128 |
|
|
|
38,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following chart presents the commission fee revenues by commodity traded in our OTC
markets for the periods presented:
Our Market Data Segment
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected statement of income data in
dollars and as a percentage of revenues for our market data segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market data fees |
|
$ |
27,073 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
$ |
19,691 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
% |
Intersegment fees |
|
|
16,129 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
7,122 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
43,224 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
26,813 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
4,174 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
39,050 |
|
|
|
90.3 |
|
|
|
23,129 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12,921 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
8,725 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
26,432 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
% |
|
$ |
14,600 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional services expenses. |
27
We earn terminal and license fee revenues that we receive from data vendors through the
distribution of real-time and historical futures prices and other futures market data derived from
trading in our futures markets. We also earn subscription fee revenues from OTC daily indices, view
only access to the OTC markets and OTC and futures end of day reports. In addition, we manage the
market price validation curves whereby participant companies subscribe to receive consensus market
valuations.
Key Statistical Information
The following table presents key transaction volume information, as well as other selected
operating information, for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for percentages and rates per contract) |
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Average Daily Trading Fee Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our U.K. futures business average daily
exchange fee revenues |
|
$ |
756 |
|
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
$ |
739 |
|
|
$ |
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our U.S. and Canadian futures business
average daily exchange fee revenues |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our bilateral global OTC business
average daily commission fee revenues |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Our cleared global OTC business average
daily commission fee revenues |
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our global OTC business average daily
commission fee revenues |
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total average daily exchange fee
and commission fee revenues |
|
$ |
2,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,816 |
|
|
$ |
2,560 |
|
|
$ |
1,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Trading Volume: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures volume |
|
|
120,630 |
|
|
|
93,166 |
|
|
|
58,101 |
|
|
|
48,079 |
|
Futures average daily volume |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
OTC volume |
|
|
135,628 |
|
|
|
79,074 |
|
|
|
68,128 |
|
|
|
38,665 |
|
OTC average daily volume |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
Our ICE Futures Europe rate per contract |
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
Our agricultural futures and options
rate per contract |
|
$ |
2.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
OTC Participants Trading Commission
Percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial companies (including
merchant energy) |
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
45.7 |
% |
|
|
48.4 |
% |
|
|
45.4 |
% |
Banks and financial institutions |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
24.8 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
Liquidity providers |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
28.8 |
% |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
28
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $67.9 million, or 62.1%, to $177.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $109.3 million for the comparable period in 2007. Net income from
our futures segment increased $21.4 million, or 34.7%, to $83.2 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 from $61.8 million for the comparable period in 2007, primarily due to higher
transaction fee revenues. Net income from our global OTC segment increased $34.6 million, or
105.3%, to $67.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $32.9 million for the
comparable period in 2007, primarily due to higher transaction fee revenues and $10.9 million in
CBOT merger-related transactions costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net
income from our market data segment increased $11.8 million, or 81.0% to $26.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $14.6 million for the comparable period in 2007, primarily due to
increased market data fees relating to our global OTC markets. Consolidated operating income, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 68.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from
59.3% for the comparable period in 2007. Consolidated net income, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, increased to 43.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 41.5% for the comparable
period in 2007.
Our consolidated revenues increased $141.1 million, or 53.6%, to $404.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $263.3 million for the comparable period in 2007. This increase is
primarily attributable to increased trading volumes in our futures and OTC markets and increased
market data fees.
Consolidated operating expenses increased $20.2 million to $127.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 from $107.1 million for the comparable period in 2007, representing an increase
of 18.9%. This increase is primarily attributable to additional depreciation and amortization
expenses recorded on fixed asset additions and intangible assets associated with acquisitions,
professional services expenses incurred relating to the establishment of ICE Clear Europe and due
to higher compensation expenses incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily
resulting from higher non-cash compensation expenses and severance costs associated with the ICE
Futures U.S. floor closure, partially offset by $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related transactions
costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Revenues
Transaction Fees
Consolidated transaction fees increased $117.4 million, or 51.8%, to $344.1 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 from $226.7 million for the comparable period in 2007. Transaction
fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 85.1% for the six months ended June
30, 2008 from 86.1% for the comparable period in 2007.
Transaction fees generated in our futures segment increased $51.6 million, or 38.8%, to $184.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $132.9 million for the comparable period in
2007, while decreasing as a percentage of consolidated revenues to 45.6% for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 from 50.5% for the comparable period in 2007. The increase in transaction fees was
primarily due to a 29.5% increase in our futures contract volumes, which was primarily attributable
to increased liquidity brought by electronic trading, new market participants, the acquisition of
ICE Futures U.S. on January 12, 2007 and increased price volatility primarily relating to real and
perceived supply and demand imbalances, geopolitical events and weather. Volumes in our futures
segment increased to 120.6 million contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 93.2
million contracts during the comparable period in 2007. The increase in transaction fees also
reflects greater relative volume growth for contracts traded on our ICE Futures U.S. exchange which
earn a higher transaction fee or rate per contract. Average transaction fees per trading day
increased 34.9% to $1.5 million per trading day for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.1
million per trading day for the comparable period in 2007.
Transaction fees generated in our global OTC segment increased $65.8 million, or 70.1%, to
$159.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $93.9 million for the comparable period
in 2007 primarily due to increased
29
trading volumes. Increased trading volumes were primarily due to increased hedging, new
customers and price volatility during the six months ended June 30, 2008 relating to real and
perceived supply and demand imbalances, geopolitical events and weather, and due to strategic
partnerships with Platts and NGX as well as the acquisitions of ChemConnect, Inc. and Chatham
Energy Partners, LLC on July 9, 2007 and October 1, 2007, respectively. Transaction fees in the
global OTC segment, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 39.5% for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 from 35.6% for the comparable period in 2007. Contract volumes in our global
OTC segment increased 71.5% to 135.6 million contracts traded during the six months ended June 30,
2008 from 79.1 million contracts traded during the comparable period in 2007. Average transaction
fees per trading day increased 69.1% to $1.2 million per trading day for the six months ended June
30, 2008 from $736,000 per trading day for the comparable period in 2007.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our global OTC segment increased
$1.4 million, or 53.4%, to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $2.6 million
for the comparable period in 2007. Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a percentage
of consolidated revenues, were 1.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Market Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $20.3 million, or 68.1%, to $50.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $29.9 million for the comparable period in 2007. This increase was
primarily due to increased data access fees generated in our OTC market and increased terminal fees
and license fees that we receive from data vendors in exchange for the provision of real-time price
information generated by our futures markets. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
we recognized $24.0 million and $11.0 million, respectively, in data access fees and terminal fees
in our global OTC and futures segments. The increase in the data access fees was due to both an
increase in the fees charged for data access, which came into effect October 1, 2007, and an
increase in the number of customers. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we
recognized $22.2 million and $15.8 million, respectively, in terminal and license fees from data
vendors in our futures segment. The increase in the market data fees received from data vendors in
our futures segment was due to both an increase in the average charge per terminal and an increase
in the number of terminals. Consolidated market data fees, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, increased to 12.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 11.3% for the comparable
period in 2007.
Other Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $3.4 million, or 50.6%, to $10.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 from $6.7 million for the comparable period in 2007. Consolidated other
revenues, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 2.5% for the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007.
Expenses
Compensation and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased $18.1 million, or 41.7%, to $61.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $43.5 million for the comparable period in
2007. This increase was primarily due to a $10.1 million increase in non-cash compensation expenses
and $1.7 million of severance costs associated with the closure of our futures open-outcry trading
floors in New York and Dublin. Also, to a lesser extent, the increase was due to higher bonus
accruals that are tied to some portion of our OTC revenue performance and due to the addition of
more highly skilled and compensated employees, primarily relating to acquisitions and growth in our
technology staff. The non-cash compensation expenses recognized in our consolidated financial
statements for our stock options and restricted stock were $17.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 as compared to $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was
primarily due to non-cash compensation costs recognized for the performance-based restricted stock
that was granted in December 2006 and December 2007. We currently expect to record non-cash
compensation expenses of approximately $18.4 million for the remaining six months of 2008. However,
this amount could increase up to approximately $29.8 million for the remaining six months of 2008
if the maximum performance level is met or exceeded relating to the performance-based restricted
shares granted in December 2007. For a discussion of our performance-based restricted shares, see
Note 8 to our
30
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 15.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 16.5% for the
comparable period in 2007 primarily due to increased revenues.
Professional Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased $2.3 million, or 20.1%, to $13.9 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $11.6 million for the comparable period in 2007. This
increase was primarily due to $3.8 million in professional services expenses incurred during the
six months ended June 30, 2008 relating to ICE Clear Europe, our European clearing house, compared
to $1.4 million incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Consolidated professional
services expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 3.4% for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 from 4.4% for the comparable period in 2007 primarily due to increased
revenues.
Patent Royalty
Patent royalty expenses were $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Consolidated
patent royalty expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 0.6% for the six months
ended June 30, 2007. The patent licensing agreement terminated in February 2007.
CBOT Merger-Related Transaction Costs
CBOT merger-related transaction costs were $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007. Consolidated CBOT merger-related transaction costs, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
were 4.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. We did not incur any CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased $4.9 million, or 19.4%, to
$30.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $25.1 million for the comparable period
in 2007. This increase was primarily due to increased technology hosting expenses, hardware and
software support, marketing expenses and rent expense that resulted from the growth of our
business. Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 7.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 9.5% for the
comparable period in 2007 primarily due to increased revenues.
Depreciation and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses increased $7.5 million, or 52.8%, to $21.8
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from $14.3 million for the comparable period in
2007. This increase was primarily due to additional depreciation expenses recorded on fixed asset
additions incurred during 2007 and during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and due to additional
amortization expenses recorded on the intangible assets associated with our acquisitions in 2007
and during the six months ended June 30, 2008. We recorded amortization expenses on the acquired
intangible assets of $7.0 million and $4.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, were 5.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Other Income (Expense)
Consolidated other income (expense) decreased from other income of $6.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 to other expense of $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
This decrease primarily related to a gain recognized on the sale of an asset during the six months
ended June 30, 2007. We recognized a gain of $9.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007
on the sale of our former open-outcry disaster recovery site in London.
31
Income Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $43.1 million to $96.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 from $53.8 million for the comparable period in 2007, primarily due to the increase
in our pre-tax income and an increase in our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate increased
to 35.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 from 33.0% for the comparable period in 2007. The
effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2008 is higher than the federal statutory rate
primarily due to state taxes and non-deductible expenses, which are partially offset by favorable
foreign income tax rates, tax exempt interest income and tax credits. The effective tax rate for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 is lower than the federal statutory rate primarily due to the
decision in the second quarter of 2007 to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries, thus eliminating the need to record U.S. taxes on these earnings.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $31.2 million, or 58.1%, to $84.9 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 from $53.7 million for the comparable period in 2007. Net income from
our futures segment increased $7.4 million, or 23.3%, to $39.2 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from $31.8 million for the comparable period in 2007, primarily due to higher
transaction fee revenues. Net income from our global OTC segment increased $18.3 million, or
132.8%, to $32.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $13.8 million for the
comparable period in 2007, primarily due to higher transaction fee revenues and $10.9 million in
CBOT merger-related transactions costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net
income from our market data segment increased $5.4 million, or 67.1%, to $13.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from $8.1 million for the comparable period in 2007, primarily due
to increased market data fees relating to our global OTC markets. Consolidated operating income, as
a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 67.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2008
from 56.0% for the comparable period in 2007. Consolidated net income, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, increased to 43.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 39.3% for
the comparable period in 2007.
Our consolidated revenues increased $60.5 million, or 44.3%, to $197.2 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 from $136.7 million for the comparable period in 2007. This increase is
primarily attributable to increased trading volumes in our futures and OTC markets and increased
market data fees.
Consolidated operating expenses increased $4.2 million to $64.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 from $60.1 million for the comparable period in 2007, representing an increase
of 7.1%. This increase is primarily attributable to additional depreciation and amortization
expenses recorded on fixed asset additions and intangible assets associated with acquisitions,
professional services expenses incurred relating to the establishment of ICE Clear Europe and due
to higher compensation expenses incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2008 primarily
resulting from higher non-cash compensation expenses, partially offset by $10.9 million in CBOT
merger-related transactions costs incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Revenues
Transaction Fees
Consolidated transaction fees increased $49.3 million, or 42.0%, to $166.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from $117.4 million for the comparable period in 2007. Transaction
fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 84.5% for the three months ended June
30, 2008 from 85.9% for the comparable period in 2007.
32
Transaction fees generated in our futures segment increased $16.3 million, or 23.0%, to $87.1
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $70.8 million for the comparable period in
2007, while decreasing as a percentage of consolidated revenues to 44.2% for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from 51.8% for the comparable period in 2007. The increase in transaction fees was
primarily due to a 20.8% increase in our futures contract volumes, which was primarily attributable
to increased liquidity brought by electronic trading, new market participants and increased price
volatility primarily relating to real and perceived supply and demand imbalances, geopolitical
events and weather. Volumes in our futures segment increased to 58.1 million contracts during the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from 48.1 million contracts during the comparable period in 2007.
The increase in transaction fees also reflects greater relative volume growth for contracts traded
on our ICE Futures U.S. exchange which earn a higher transaction fee or rate per contract. Average
transaction fees per trading day increased 20.1% to $1.3 million per trading day for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.1 million per trading day for the comparable period in 2007.
Transaction fees generated in our global OTC segment increased $33.0 million, or 70.8%, to
$79.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $46.6 million for the comparable period
in 2007 primarily due to increased trading volumes. Increased trading volumes were primarily due to
increased hedging, new customers and price volatility during the three months ended June 30, 2008
relating to real and perceived supply and demand imbalances, geopolitical events and weather, and
due to strategic partnerships with Platts and NGX as well as the acquisitions of ChemConnect, Inc.
and Chatham Energy Partners, LLC on July 9, 2007 and October 1, 2007, respectively. Transaction
fees in the global OTC segment, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 40.4% for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 34.1% for the comparable period in 2007. Contract volumes
in our global OTC segment increased 76.2% to 68.1 million contracts traded during the three months
ended June 30, 2008 from 38.7 million contracts traded during the comparable period in 2007.
Average transaction fees per trading day increased 68.7% to $1.2 million per trading day for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from $718,000 per trading day for the comparable period in 2007.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our global OTC segment increased
$679,000, or 49.9%, to $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $1.4 million for
the comparable period in 2007. Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, were 1.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Market Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $9.6 million, or 60.9%, to $25.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 from $15.8 million for the comparable period in 2007. This increase was
primarily due to increased data access fees generated in our OTC market and increased terminal fees
and license fees that we receive from data vendors in exchange for the provision of real-time price
information generated by our futures markets. During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
we recognized $12.0 million and $5.7 million, respectively, in data access fees and terminal fees
in our global OTC and futures segments. The increase in the data access fees was due to both an
increase in the fees charged for data access, which came into effect October 1, 2007, and an
increase in the number of customers. During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we
recognized $11.4 million and $8.4 million, respectively, in terminal and license fees from data
vendors in our futures segment. The increase in the market data fees received from data vendors in
our futures segment was due to both an increase in the average charge per terminal and an increase
in the number of terminals. Consolidated market data fees, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, increased to 12.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 11.6% for the comparable
period in 2007.
Other Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $1.6 million, or 45.6%, to $5.0 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 from $3.4 million for the comparable period in 2007. Consolidated other
revenues, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 2.5% for the three months ended June 30,
2008 and 2007.
33
Expenses
Compensation and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased $9.2 million, or 42.4%, to $30.9
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $21.7 million for the comparable period in
2007. This increase was primarily due to a $6.0 million increase in non-cash compensation expenses,
due to higher bonus accruals that are tied to some portion of our OTC revenue performance and due
to the addition of more highly skilled and compensated employees, primarily relating to
acquisitions and growth in our technology staff. The non-cash compensation expenses recognized in
our consolidated financial statements for our stock options and restricted stock were $9.9 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to non-cash compensation costs recognized for the
performance-based restricted stock that was granted in December 2006 and December 2007, including a
cumulative year-to-date adjustment of $1.9 million that was recorded during the three months ended
June 30, 2008. We currently expect to record non-cash compensation expenses of approximately $18.4
million for the remaining six months of 2008. However, this amount could increase up to
approximately $29.8 million for the remaining six months of 2008 if the maximum performance level
is met or exceeded relating to the performance-based restricted shares granted in December 2007.
For a discussion of our performance-based restricted shares, see Note 8 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
decreased to 15.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 15.9% for the comparable period in
2007 primarily due to increased revenues.
Professional Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased $214,000, or 3.2%, to $6.9 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $6.7 million for the comparable period in 2007. This
increase was primarily due to $2.2 million in professional services expenses incurred during the
three months ended June 30, 2008 relating to ICE Clear Europe, our European clearing house,
compared to $862,000 incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2007. Consolidated
professional services expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 3.5% for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 from 4.9% for the comparable period in 2007 primarily due to
increased revenues.
CBOT Merger-Related Transaction Costs
CBOT merger-related transaction costs were $10.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2007. Consolidated CBOT transaction costs, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 8.0% for
the three months ended June 30, 2007. We did not incur any CBOT merger-related transaction costs
during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2.7 million, or 20.6%, to
$15.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $13.0 million for the comparable period
in 2007. This increase was primarily due to increased technology hosting expenses, hardware and
software support, marketing expenses and rent expense that resulted from the growth of our
business. Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 8.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 9.5% for the
comparable period in 2007 primarily due to increased revenues.
Depreciation and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses increased $3.1 million, or 40.0%, to $10.8
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $7.7 million for the comparable period in
2007. This increase was primarily due to additional depreciation expenses recorded on fixed asset
additions incurred during 2007 and during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and due to additional
amortization expenses recorded on the intangible assets associated with our acquisitions in 2007
and during the six months ended June 30, 2008. We recorded amortization expenses on the acquired
intangible assets of $3.6 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 5.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 5.7% for the
comparable period in 2007 primarily due to increased revenues.
34
Other Income (Expense)
Consolidated other expense decreased from other expense of $1.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 to other expense of $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. This
decrease primarily related to a decrease in interest expense during the three months ended June 30,
2008. Interest expense decreased $288,000 to $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008
from $4.3 million for the comparable period in 2007 primarily due to a reduction in the interest
rate on the outstanding credit facilities debt from 6.11% during the three months ended June 30,
2007 to 3.32% for the three months ended June 30, 2008, partially offset by $1.5 million in
interest expense recorded relating to the Russell Licensing Agreement during the three months ended
June 30, 2008.
Income Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $25.3 million to $46.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from $21.5 million for the comparable period in 2007, primarily due to the increase
in our pre-tax income and an increase in our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate increased
to 35.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 28.6% for the comparable period in 2007. The
effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2008 is higher than the federal statutory
rate primarily due to state taxes and non-deductible expenses, which are partially offset by
favorable foreign income tax rates, tax exempt interest income and tax credits. The effective tax
rate for the three months ended June 30, 2007 is lower than the federal statutory rate primarily
due to the decision in the second quarter of 2007 to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of our
foreign subsidiaries, thus eliminating the need to record U.S. taxes on these earnings.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth quarterly unaudited consolidated statements of income for the
periods presented. We believe that this data has been prepared on substantially the same basis as
our audited consolidated financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of our consolidated results of
operations for the quarters presented. The historical results for any quarter do not necessarily
indicate the results expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures |
|
$ |
23,809 |
|
|
$ |
23,109 |
|
|
$ |
21,320 |
|
|
$ |
22,071 |
|
|
$ |
21,796 |
|
ICE WTI Crude futures |
|
|
12,722 |
|
|
|
13,030 |
|
|
|
12,592 |
|
|
|
12,791 |
|
|
|
11,889 |
|
ICE Gas Oil futures |
|
|
9,532 |
|
|
|
10,929 |
|
|
|
10,599 |
|
|
|
10,051 |
|
|
|
7,911 |
|
Sugar futures and options |
|
|
21,491 |
|
|
|
26,248 |
|
|
|
12,160 |
|
|
|
12,829 |
|
|
|
14,823 |
|
Cotton futures and options |
|
|
6,281 |
|
|
|
9,297 |
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
Other futures products and options |
|
|
13,255 |
|
|
|
14,772 |
|
|
|
10,737 |
|
|
|
10,671 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
OTC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas |
|
|
58,205 |
|
|
|
59,543 |
|
|
|
43,410 |
|
|
|
41,665 |
|
|
|
34,275 |
|
North American power |
|
|
16,157 |
|
|
|
15,702 |
|
|
|
12,627 |
|
|
|
12,212 |
|
|
|
9,713 |
|
Other commodities markets |
|
|
3,171 |
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
Electronic trade confirmation services |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
Market data fees |
|
|
25,493 |
|
|
|
24,720 |
|
|
|
23,306 |
|
|
|
17,225 |
|
|
|
15,846 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
5,062 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
3,420 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
197,160 |
|
|
|
207,214 |
|
|
|
159,296 |
|
|
|
151,735 |
|
|
|
136,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
30,923 |
|
|
|
30,679 |
|
|
|
34,913 |
|
|
|
23,009 |
|
|
|
21,717 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
6,928 |
|
|
|
6,972 |
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
|
6,714 |
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
15,680 |
|
|
|
14,337 |
|
|
|
13,457 |
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
|
|
13,002 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,844 |
|
|
|
10,946 |
|
|
|
9,546 |
|
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
64,375 |
|
|
|
62,934 |
|
|
|
62,769 |
|
|
|
50,871 |
|
|
|
60,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
132,785 |
|
|
|
144,280 |
|
|
|
96,527 |
|
|
|
100,864 |
|
|
|
76,529 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
46,775 |
|
|
|
50,129 |
|
|
|
31,437 |
|
|
|
32,593 |
|
|
|
21,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
84,864 |
|
|
$ |
92,290 |
|
|
$ |
64,652 |
|
|
$ |
66,681 |
|
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2008
include $2.1 million in costs associated with the closure of ICE
Futures U.S.s futures trading floors, including $1.7 million in
compensation expenses. |
35
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have financed our operations, growth and cash needs primarily through
income from operations and borrowings under our credit facilities. Our principal capital
requirements have been to fund capital expenditures, working capital, strategic acquisitions, and
marketing and development of our electronic trading platform. We financed the cash portion of the
merger with ICE Futures U.S. in 2007 with cash on hand and borrowings under a senior unsecured
credit facility discussed below. We financed the other acquisitions we made in 2007 and 2008 with
cash on hand and we will also finance the cash portion of the Creditex acquisition with cash on
hand. In the future, we may need to incur additional debt or issue additional equity in connection
with our strategic acquisitions or investments. See also Future Capital Requirements below.
We had consolidated cash and cash equivalents of $362.9 million and $119.6 million as of June
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. We had $17.6 million and $141.0 million in short-term
and long-term investments as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and $30.9
million and $22.6 million in short-term and long-term restricted cash as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments with
remaining maturity dates of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. We
classify all investments with original maturity dates in excess of three months and with maturities
less than one year as short-term investments. We classify all investments that we intend to hold
for more than one year as long-term investments. We classify all cash that is not available for
general use, either due to FSA requirements or through restrictions in specific agreements, as
restricted cash.
Cash Flow
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the major components of net increases
(decreases) in cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
191,552 |
|
|
$ |
94,804 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
70,377 |
|
|
|
(443,043 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(18,660 |
) |
|
|
264,842 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
243,261 |
|
|
$ |
(83,405 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by operating activities was $191.6 million and $94.8 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Net cash provided by operating
activities primarily consists of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization and the effects of changes in working capital. Fluctuations in net
cash provided by operating activities are primarily attributable to increases and decreases in our
net income between periods and, to a lesser extent, due to fluctuations in working capital. The
$96.7 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June
30, 2008 from the comparable period in 2007 is primarily due to the $21.4 million increase in our
futures segments net income, the $34.6 million increase in our global OTC segments net income,
and the $11.8 million increase in our market data segments net income for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 from the comparable period in 2007.
36
Investing Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $70.4 million and ($443.0
million) for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Consolidated net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
primarily relates to cash paid for acquisitions, sales and purchases of available-for-sale
investments, capital expenditures in each period for software, including internally developed
software, and for computer and network equipment. We paid out cash for acquisitions, net of cash
acquired, of $29.6 million and $392.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. We had a net decrease (increase) in investments classified as available-for-sale of
$123.3 million and ($29.8 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We incurred capitalized software development costs of $7.2 million and $5.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and we had additional capital expenditures of
$7.9 million and $19.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
additional capital expenditures primarily relate to hardware purchases to continue the development
and expansion of our electronic platform and related technology infrastructure.
Financing Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was ($18.7 million) and
$264.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Consolidated net cash
used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily relates to $42.0
million in cash payments related to treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock option
tax payments and $18.8 million in repayments for the credit facilities, partially offset by $40.0
million in excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation. Consolidated net cash provided by
financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily relates to the $250.0 million
in proceeds received from the credit facilities and $40.1 million in excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation, partially offset by $19.3 million in cash payments related to treasury
shares received for restricted stock and stock option tax payments.
Loan Agreements
We financed the cash portion of the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition with cash on hand and
borrowings under a senior unsecured credit facility, or the Credit Facilities, dated January 12,
2007. The Credit Facilities provide for a term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$250.0 million and a revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million.
We used the proceeds of the $250.0 million term loan along with $166.8 million of cash on hand to
finance the $416.8 million cash component of the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. Under the terms of
the Credit Facilities, we can borrow an aggregate principal amount of up to $250.0 million under
the revolving credit facility at any time until its termination on January 12, 2010. We have agreed
to reserve $50.0 million of the $250.0 million available under the revolving credit facility for
use by ICE Clear U.S. to provide short-term liquidity, if necessary, in the event of a default by a
clearing member. The remaining amount under the revolving credit facility can be used by us for
general corporate purposes.
As of June 30, 2008, we had a $203.1 million three month LIBOR loan outstanding under the term
loan facility with a stated interest rate of 3.30% per annum. For the borrowings under the term
loan facility, we began making payments on June 30, 2007, and will make payments quarterly
thereafter until January 12, 2012, the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the merger with ICE
Futures U.S. The Credit Facilities include an unutilized revolving credit commitment that is equal
to the unused maximum revolver amount multiplied by an applicable margin rate and is payable in
arrears on a quarterly basis. The Credit Facilities require us to use 100% of the net cash proceeds
raised from debt issuances or asset dispositions, with certain limited exceptions, to prepay
outstanding loans under the Credit Facilities. With limited exceptions, we may prepay the
outstanding loans under the Credit Facilities, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The
Credit Facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited to,
leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as limitations or required approvals for
acquisitions, dispositions of assets and certain investments, the incurrence of additional debt or
the creation of liens and other fundamental changes to our business. We have been and are currently
in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Credit Facilities.
On June 27, 2008, we entered into a separate senior unsecured credit agreement, or the Credit
Agreement, which provides for a 364-day revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount
of $150.0 million, which may be increased to $200.0 million under certain conditions. The Credit
Agreement is available for operational use solely by
37
ICE Clear Europe. No amounts are outstanding under the Credit Agreement at June 30, 2008. The
Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited to,
leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as limitations or required approvals for
acquisitions, dispositions of assets and certain investments, the incurrence of additional debt or
the creation of liens and other fundamental changes to our business. We have been and are currently
in compliance with all applicable covenants under the Credit Agreement.
Future Capital Requirements
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of our trading
volume growth, required technology initiatives, regulatory compliance costs, the timing and
introduction of new products and enhancements to existing products, and the continuing market
acceptance of our electronic platform. We currently expect to make capital expenditures ranging
between an aggregate of $36 million and $40 million in 2008, which we believe will support the
enhancement of our technology and the continued expansion of our futures, OTC and market data
businesses. We believe that our cash flows from operations and the $200 million available under the
revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs and capital
expenditure requirements at least through the end of 2009.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
In the second quarter of 2008, there were no significant changes to our contractual
obligations and commercial commitments from those disclosed in the section Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, or our 2007 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently do not have any relationships to unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships that have been established for the sole purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually limited purpose.
New and Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands fair value measurement
disclosures. SFAS No. 157 is effective in 2008, except as amended by FASB Staff Position SFAS No.
157-2, discussed below. We adopted the effective portions of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008. The
impact of our adoption of SFAS No. 157 was not material to our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which permits entities to
choose to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized
gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in
earnings. We adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008 and did not elect the fair value options under
SFAS No. 159. The impact of our adoption of SFAS No. 159 had no effect on our consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, or SFAS
No. 141(R). SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited
exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition
related items including expensing acquisition related costs as incurred, valuing non-controlling
interests at fair value at the acquisition date and expensing restructuring costs associated with
an acquired business. SFAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure
requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. We expect SFAS No. 141(R) will have an impact on
our accounting for future business combinations once adopted but the extent of the impact is
dependent upon the size, complexity and number of acquisitions that are made in the future.
38
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, or FSP No. 157-2, which delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 from 2008 to
2009 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized
or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We
do not expect our adoption of FSP No. 157-2 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In the second quarter of 2008, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting
policies and estimates from those disclosed in the section Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2007 Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of business. This market risk
consists primarily of interest rate risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents, short-term
investments, restricted cash, long-term investments and current and long-term debt, as well as
foreign currency exchange rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our cash and cash equivalents, short-term and
long-term investments and restricted cash were $411.3 million and $283.2 million, respectively, of
which $20.5 million and $16.0 million, respectively, were denominated in pounds sterling and
Canadian dollars. The remaining investments were denominated in U.S. dollars. We do not use our
investment portfolio for trading or other speculative purposes. A hypothetical 100 basis point
decrease in long-term interest rates would decrease annual pre-tax earnings by $4.1 million,
assuming no change in the amount or composition of our cash and cash equivalents, short-term and
long-term investments and restricted cash.
As of June 30, 2008, we had outstanding a $203.1 million term loan under our Credit Facilities
which is subject to interest rate risk. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in long-term
interest rates would decrease annual pre-tax earnings by $2.0 million, assuming no change in the
volume or composition of our debt. We currently reset the interest rates on a quarterly basis.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have foreign currency transaction risk related to the settlement of foreign currency
denominated assets, liabilities and payables that occur through our foreign operations, which are
received in or paid in pounds sterling, due to the increase or decrease in the period-end foreign
currency exchange rates between periods. We had foreign currency transaction gains of $325,000 and
$93,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, primarily attributable to
the fluctuations of pounds sterling relative to the U.S. dollar. The average exchange rate of
pounds sterling to the U.S. dollar increased from 1.9706 for the six months ended June 30, 2007 to
1.9750 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Of our consolidated revenues, 1.4% and 1.0% were denominated in pounds sterling or Canadian
dollars for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Of our consolidated
operating expenses, 16.0% and 15.7% were denominated in pounds sterling or Canadian dollars for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As the pounds sterling or Canadian dollar
exchange rate changes, the U.S. equivalent of revenues and expenses denominated in foreign
currencies changes accordingly. A 10% adverse change in the underlying foreign currency exchange
rates would not have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Revenues in our businesses are denominated in U.S. dollars, except with respect to a small
number of futures contracts at ICE Futures Europe and sales through ICE Futures Canada. We may
experience gains or losses from foreign currency transactions in the future given there are still
net assets or net liabilities and expenses of our U.K. and Canadian subsidiaries financial
statements that are denominated in pounds sterling or Canadian dollars. Our
39
U.K. operations in some instances function as a natural hedge because we generally hold an
equal amount of monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in pounds sterling.
In connection with our acquisition of ICE Futures Canada in August 2007, we have foreign
currency translation risk equal to our net investment in certain Canadian subsidiaries. The
revenues, expenses and financial results of these Canadian subsidiaries are denominated in Canadian
dollars, which is the functional currency of these subsidiaries. The financial statements of these
subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using a current rate of exchange, with gains or
losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment account, a component of shareholders
equity. As of June 30, 2008, the portion of our shareholders equity attributable to accumulated
other comprehensive income from foreign currency translation was $31.5 million. The period-end
foreign currency exchange rate for the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar decreased from 1.0120 as
of December 31, 2007 to 0.9818 as of June 30, 2008.
Impact of Inflation
We have not been adversely affected by inflation as technological advances and competition
have generally caused prices for the hardware and software that we use for our electronic platform
to remain constant or to decline. In the event of inflation, we believe that we will be able to
pass on any price increases to our participants, as the prices that we charge are not governed by
long-term contracts.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by
this report, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon
that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these
disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
(b) Changes in internal controls. There were no changes in our internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting. As a result, no corrective actions were taken.
Part II. Other Information
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
On April 6, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, granted ICE
Futures U.S.s motion to dismiss all claims brought against it in an action commenced on December
8, 2006, by certain holders of non-equity trading permits, or the Permit Holders, of ICE Futures
U.S. The plaintiffs alleged that, in violation of purported contract rights and/or rights under New
Yorks Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, ICE Futures U.S. had not allowed its Permit Holders,
including the plaintiffs, to vote on the merger pursuant to which we acquired ICE Futures U.S., and
had improperly denied the Permit Holders a portion of the merger consideration. Plaintiffs sought
(i) to enjoin consummation of the merger, (ii) declaratory relief regarding their past and future
rights as Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of unspecified damages on claims for breach of
fiduciary duty, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, estoppel and fraud. In addition to
dismissing its claims, the court also denied the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction.
On February 4, 2008, the Permit Holders appealed the lower courts ruling dismissing their
complaint but did not pursue an appeal of the lower courts denial of their request for an order
enjoining the merger. The appeal was denied in its entirety by the appellate court in a decision
issued on June 24, 2008. The Permit Holders may only appeal that decision with the express
authorization of the appeals court. The time within which the Permit Holders may seek such
authorization has not expired.
40
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of our 2007 Form 10-K includes a detailed discussion of the
risks and uncertainties we currently believe may materially affect us. We urge you to read that
discussion as well as the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations Regulation section of this Form 10-Q for additional information about the
regulatory environment in which we operate. The information presented below supplements, and should
be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed in our 2007 Form 10-K. If
any of the risks discussed in our 2007 Form 10-K or this Form 10-Q actually occur, our business,
financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
The energy commodities trading industry has been and continues to be subject to increased
legislative and regulatory scrutiny, and we face the risk of changes to our regulatory environment
in the future, which may diminish trading volumes on our electronic platform.
Providing facilities to trade energy products is one of our core businesses. Recently, given
the high price of energy, crude oil and other commodities, the U.S. Congress has held numerous
hearings regarding the proper regulation of energy trading and, in particular, the potential impact
of speculation on energy prices. In addition, the U.K.s Treasury Select Committee has also held a
hearing on this issue. Currently, numerous bills are pending before the U.S. Congress addressing
regulation of trading within the energy markets and additional bills may be introduced. The passage
of certain bills could negatively impact our business by limiting the amount of trading that is
conducted in our markets.
We currently operate our OTC markets as an exempt commercial market under the CEA. As such,
our markets are subject to anti-fraud, anti-manipulation, access, reporting and record-keeping
requirements of the CFTC. However, unlike a futures exchange, ICE is not itself a self regulatory
organization that undertakes regulatory oversight of OTC trading. In May 2008, Congress passed
legislation as part of the Farm Bill to increase regulation of OTC markets. The new legislation
requires and grants authority to OTC electronic trading facilities to assume self regulatory
responsibilities, such as market monitoring and establishing position limits or accountability
levels, over contracts that serve a significant price discovery function. This legislation would
require us and our OTC participants to operate under heightened regulatory burdens and incur
additional costs, including recordkeeping and reporting costs, to comply with the additional
regulations, and could deter some participants from trading on our OTC platform. Presently, we
anticipate that our OTC Henry Hub natural gas contract, which comprised 72.9%, 73.4%, 81.6% and
76.5% of our OTC transaction volumes and 21.3%, 21.4%, 30.1% and 32.9% of our consolidated revenues
in the first six months of 2008, and the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005,
respectively, would be considered a significant price discovery contract. It is possible that the
CFTC will deem additional OTC contracts traded in our markets to be significant price discovery
contracts. Bills currently pending in the U.S. Congress could, if enacted, subject our OTC markets
to a level of regulation identical or comparable to that of regulated exchanges.
In the United Kingdom, we engage in a variety of activities related to our business through
subsidiary entities that are subject to supervision by the FSA. ICE Futures Europe is recognized as
an investment exchange and self-regulatory organization by the FSA in accordance with the FSMA. As
such, ICE Futures Europe maintains front-line regulatory responsibility for its markets and is
subject to regulatory oversight by the FSA. To retain its status as a recognized investment
exchange, ICE Futures Europe is required to dedicate sufficient resources to its regulatory
functions and to meet various regulatory requirements relating to sufficiency of financial
resources, adequacy of systems and controls and effectiveness of arrangements for monitoring and
disciplining its members. Failure to comply with these requirements could subject ICE Futures
Europe to significant penalties, including de-recognition. ICE Futures Europe has direct electronic
access in the United States through no action relief from the CFTC. Several bills currently
pending before the U.S. Congress would modify or eliminate this no action relief and force ICE
Futures Europe to register with the CFTC as a Designated Contract Market for any energy products
with a U.S. delivery point or for any contract that references the settlement price of a U.S.
designated contract market, such as ICE Futures Europes West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, crude oil
contract. Other bills would require ICE Futures Europe to adopt U.S. regulation of its energy
contracts with U.S. delivery points or that references the settlement price of a U.S. designated
contract market. In addition, one proposed bill in the U.S. Congress could require ICE Futures
Europe to place lower position limits on energy contracts linked to settlement prices of a U.S.
designated contract market than the U.S. designated contract market itself imposes. In July 2008,
the U.K.s Treasury Select
41
Committee held a hearing regarding the potential impact of speculation on energy prices in
both ICE Futures Europes on-exchange market and the U.K.s OTC market. This included consideration
of the CFTCs amendment of ICE Futures Europes no action letter. While no change to legislation or
regulation in the United Kingdom is currently proposed, it is possible that the regulatory
environment in the United Kingdom for exchange traded energy commodities could change in the
future.
In June 2008, the CFTC modified ICE Futures Europes screen based no action letter to
require ICE Futures Europe to adopt position limits and position accountability levels for its
energy contracts for products with U.S. delivery points or which reference the settlement price of
a U.S. designated contract market. The modified no action letter also requires ICE Futures Europe
to provide additional trading information to the CFTC to permit the CFTC to incorporate such
information into its large trader reporting system. The products impacted include ICE Futures
Europes WTI crude oil contract, its RBOB gasoline contract, and its New York Harbor heating oil
contract. ICE Futures has until October 15, 2008 to comply with the revised terms of its no
action letter.
In addition, the bills currently pending before the U.S. Congress could, if enacted, impose
limits on the size of positions that may be established or maintained by participants in our OTC
markets and could prohibit certain participants from trading in OTC markets. Further, allegations
of manipulative trading by market participants or the failure of industry participants could
subject us, our markets or our industry to regulatory scrutiny, possible fines or restrictions, as
well as significant legal expenses and adverse publicity. These changes, if enacted, and increased
regulation regarding commodity prices, market participants or the OTC and futures markets generally
could materially adversely affect our business. New laws and rules applicable to us could
significantly increase our regulatory compliance costs, delay or prevent us from introducing new
products and services as planned and discourage some market participants from using our markets.
Any of these events could lead to lower trading volumes, liquidity and transaction fees, higher
operating costs and lower profitability or losses.
We are currently subject to regulation in multiple jurisdictions. Failure to comply with
existing regulatory requirements, and possible future changes in these requirements or in the
current interpretation of these requirements, could adversely affect our business.
ICE Futures Europe, through which we conduct our energy futures business, operates as a
Recognized Investment Exchange in the United Kingdom. As a Recognized Investment Exchange, ICE
Futures Europe has regulatory responsibility in its own right and is subject to supervision by the
FSA pursuant to the FSMA. ICE Futures Europe is required under the FSMA to maintain sufficient
financial resources, adequate systems and controls and effective arrangements for monitoring and
disciplining its members. Likewise, ICE Futures U.S. operates as a Designated Contract Market. As a
self-regulatory organization, it is responsible for ensuring that the exchange operates in
accordance with existing rules and regulations, and must comply with eighteen core principles under
the CEA. The ability of ICE Futures Europe and ICE Futures U.S. to comply with all applicable laws
and rules is largely dependent on its maintenance of compliance, audit and reporting systems. We
cannot assure you that these systems and procedures are fully effective. Failure to comply with
current regulatory requirements and regulatory requirements that may be imposed on us in the future
could subject us to significant penalties, including termination of our ability to conduct our
regulated energy futures business through ICE Futures Europe and our regulated soft commodities
business through ICE Futures U.S.
Electronic trading in our energy futures contracts on ICE Futures Europe is permitted in many
jurisdictions around the world, including in the United States, through no action relief from the
local jurisdictions regulator. In the United States, direct electronic access to trading in ICE
Futures Europe products is offered to U.S. persons based on a series of no action letters from the
CFTC that permit non-U.S. exchanges, referred to as foreign boards of trade, to provide U.S.
persons with electronic access to their markets without registration with the CFTC as a U.S.
regulated exchange. Our ability to offer our current and new futures products under our existing no
action relief could be impacted by any actions taken by the CFTC as a result of additional
conditions being imposed on ICE Futures Europe under its no action relief. In addition, certain of
the bills pending before the U.S. Congress would, if enacted, either eliminate the no action relief
granted to ICE Futures Europe and other non-U.S. exchanges, or impose additional regulatory and
reporting requirements as a condition for the continuation of such relief. If our offering of
products through ICE Futures Europe to U.S. participants is subject to additional regulatory
constraints, our business could be adversely affected.
42
Similarly, electronic trading in ICE Futures U.S. contracts is permitted in many jurisdictions
through no action relief from the local jurisdictions regulatory requirements. With the end of
open outcry trading of ICE Futures U.S. agricultural futures contracts in February 2008, the
ability of ICE Futures U.S. to offer trading in these futures products in multiple jurisdictions
will be dependent upon its ability to comply with the existing conditions of its no action relief
in various jurisdictions and any new conditions that may be added.
New legislation, regulations or enforcement may require us to allocate more resources to
regulatory compliance and oversight and may diminish confidence in our markets, which would
adversely affect our business. Even the perception of unfairness or illegal behavior in our markets
could adversely affect our business. In addition, the recent demise of certain hedge funds that
traded energy commodities may result in additional regulation on our business or on our
participants by the CFTC or the U.S. Congress. Legislative and regulatory initiatives, either in
the United States, the United Kingdom or elsewhere, could affect one or more of the following
aspects of our business or impose one or more of the following requirements:
|
|
|
the manner in which we communicate with and contract with our participants; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we impose additional position limits or position
accountability limits on our participants; |
|
|
|
|
prohibitions against certain categories of participants (e.g., pension funds)
from accessing our markets; |
|
|
|
|
the demand for and pricing of our products and services; |
|
|
|
|
the tax treatment of trading in our products; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we maintain minimum regulatory capital on hand; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we exercise regulatory oversight of our OTC participants,
and assume responsibility for their conduct; |
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we make additional reports to regulatory authorities
regarding the trading activities of our participants, which would impact our financial
and regulatory reporting practices; |
|
|
|
|
our record-keeping and record-retention procedures; |
|
|
|
|
the licensing of our employees; and |
|
|
|
|
the conduct of our directors, officers, employees and affiliates. |
The implementation of new legislation or regulations, or changes in or unfavorable
interpretations of existing regulations by courts or regulatory bodies, could require us to incur
significant compliance costs and impede our ability to operate, expand and enhance our electronic
platform as necessary to remain competitive and grow our business. Regulatory changes inside or
outside the United States or the United Kingdom could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Legislative or regulatory changes regarding the operation of clearing facilities or preventing
them from being owned or controlled by exchanges may prevent us from operating a clearing house.
Many clearing firms have emphasized the importance to them of centralizing clearing of futures
contracts and options on futures contracts to maximize the efficient use of their capital, exercise
greater control over their value at risk and extract greater operating leverage from clearing
activities. Many clearing firms have expressed the view that clearing firms should have a choice of
where to clear their transactions or should control the governance of clearing houses. In addition,
some clearing firms have expressed the view that multiple clearing houses should be consolidated
and operated as utilities rather than as for-profit enterprises. Some of these firms, along with
the Futures Industry Association and U.K. Futures and Options Associations, are attempting to cause
legislative or regulatory changes to be adopted that would allow market participants to transfer
positions from an exchange-owned clearing house (such as ICE Clear Europe) to a clearing house
owned and controlled by clearing firms. Some market participants, including the U.K. Futures and
Options Association, have expressed support for extending the European Union Code of Clearing and
Conduct to derivatives, which would mandate clearing choice for customers through interoperability.
In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice released comments on February 7, 2008
43
requesting the U.S. Department of Treasury to review futures markets to determine if a
different regime for clearing is feasible, which could include ending exchange control of financial
futures clearing to foster exchange competition. The Department of Justice comments specifically
excluded markets for commodity futures, such as energy and agricultural futures markets. In
addition, several Members of the U.S. Congress have advocated for higher margins on futures
products, which could change the way we collect margin or operate the risk management functions of
our clearing houses. If these legislative or regulatory changes are adopted, alternative clearing
houses may seek to clear positions established on our exchanges. Even if they are not successful in
their efforts, the factors described above may cause clearing firms to limit the use of our
clearing houses. If any of these events occur, our revenues and profits would be materially and
adversely affected.
Our cost structure is largely fixed. If our revenues decline and we are unable to reduce our
costs, or if our expenses increase without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability
will be adversely affected.
Our cost structure is largely fixed and we expect that it will continue to be largely fixed in
the foreseeable future. We base our expectations of our cost structure on historical and expected
levels of demand for our products and services as well as our fixed operating infrastructure, such
as computer hardware and software, leases, hosting facilities and security and staffing levels. If
demand for our current products and services declines, our revenues will decline. If demand for
future products that we acquire or license is not to the level necessary to offset the cost of the
acquisition or license, our net income would decline. For example, we have incurred significant
costs to secure the exclusive license with the Russell Investment Group for listing Russells index
futures. The costs we incurred to secure the exclusive license will be amortized over the next
several years. If our clearing and execution fees for the Russell index futures is not sufficient
to offset the amortization cost, our net income will decrease. We may not be able to adjust our
cost structure on a timely basis to counteract a decrease in revenue or net income, which would
result in an adverse impact on our profitability.
The nature and role of ICE Futures U.S.s self-regulatory responsibilities may change.
Some financial services regulators have publicly stated their interest in evaluating the
ability of a financial exchange, organized as a for-profit corporation, to adequately discharge its
self-regulatory responsibilities. ICE Futures U.S.s regulatory programs and capabilities
contribute significantly to its brand name and reputation. We cannot assure you that ICE Futures
U.S. will not be required to further modify or restructure its corporate governance or regulatory
functions in order to address these or other concerns. For example, the CFTC adopted, but recently
stayed implementation of, final rules to minimize conflicts of interest on boards of directors of
registered, futures exchanges, or designated contract markets. The new rules provided a safe harbor
to designated contract markets that had at least 35% of their board of directors comprised of
persons with no material relationship to the designated contract market or its members and who
therefore were deemed to be public directors. While the rules regarding conflicts of interest
that were stayed would not likely result in costly or burdensome changes at ICE Futures U.S.,
implementation of such rules could alter the composition of ICE Futures U.S.s board of directors
and any future new rules, modifications of existing rules or restructuring of regulatory functions
could entail material costs.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Our annual meeting of shareholders was held in Atlanta, Georgia on May 15, 2008. At the annual
meeting, the shareholders were presented with two proposals as set forth in our annual proxy
statement, both of which were approved.
44
Out of 70,512,717 shares of stock entitled to vote at such meeting based upon the record date
of March 18, 2008, there were present in person or by proxy an aggregate of 59,169,405 shares,
constituting a quorum. The following sets forth detailed information regarding the results of the
voting at the meeting for each proposal:
Proposal 1. The shareholders elected the following directors to serve for the ensuing year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Nominee |
|
|
Number of Votes For |
|
|
Number of Votes Withheld |
|
|
Charles R. Crisp |
|
|
57,655,772 |
|
|
1,513,633 |
|
|
Jean-Marc Forneri |
|
|
30,490,067 |
|
|
28,679,338 |
|
|
Fred W. Hatfield |
|
|
53,443,330 |
|
|
5,726,075 |
|
|
Terrence F. Martell |
|
|
57,602,368 |
|
|
1,567,037 |
|
|
Sir Robert Reid |
|
|
57,526,613 |
|
|
1,642,792 |
|
|
Frederic V. Salerno |
|
|
54,291,303 |
|
|
4,878,102 |
|
|
Frederick W. Schoenhut |
|
|
57,554,976 |
|
|
1,614,429 |
|
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher |
|
|
56,850,127 |
|
|
2,319,278 |
|
|
Judith A. Sprieser |
|
|
56,517,405 |
|
|
2,652,000 |
|
|
Vincent Tese |
|
|
56,707,446 |
|
|
2,461,959 |
|
|
Proposal 2. The shareholders ratified the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Against |
|
|
Abstain |
|
|
57,798,239
|
|
|
908,301
|
|
|
462,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description of Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended on May 15, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., Columbia Merger Corporation,
Creditex Group Inc. and TA Associates, Inc. dated June 3, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to $500,000,000 Credit Agreement among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and the Lenders named therein dated as of
June 13, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 19, 2008,
File No. 001-32671). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
$150,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2008, among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and other Lenders named therein (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the SEC on July 3, 2008, File No. 001-32671). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
45
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 4, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Scott A. Hill
|
|
|
|
Scott A. Hill |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
46