Veramark Technologies, Inc. 10-Q
FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For Quarter Ended March 31, 2008
Commission File Number 0-13898
Veramark Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
16-1192368 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
or Organization) |
|
|
3750 Monroe Avenue, Pittsford, NY 14534
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(585) 381-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). YES o NO þ
The number of shares of Common Stock, $.10 par value, outstanding on March 10, 2008 was 9,461,368.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1 Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 - 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 - 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 - 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
13- 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
Officers Certifications and Signatures |
|
24 28 |
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-32.2 |
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
372,010 |
|
|
$ |
713,342 |
|
Investments |
|
|
1,676,914 |
|
|
|
1,492,288 |
|
Accounts receivable, trade (net
of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $32,826 and $30,000, respectively) |
|
|
1,112,625 |
|
|
|
1,303,240 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
31,764 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
259,598 |
|
|
|
254,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
3,434,941 |
|
|
|
3,794,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
3,832,076 |
|
|
|
5,955,064 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(3,338,013 |
) |
|
|
(5,433,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment (Net) |
|
|
494,063 |
|
|
|
521,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software development costs (net of
accumulated amortization of $2,442,754
and $2,179,290, respectively) |
|
|
2,975,410 |
|
|
|
3,038,410 |
|
Pension assets |
|
|
3,234,027 |
|
|
|
3,210,204 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
815,756 |
|
|
|
830,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets |
|
|
7,025,193 |
|
|
|
7,079,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
10,954,197 |
|
|
$ |
11,395,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
258,273 |
|
|
$ |
317,127 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
594,744 |
|
|
|
934,387 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
3,491,664 |
|
|
|
3,369,324 |
|
Current portion of pension obligation |
|
|
450,565 |
|
|
|
440,084 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
181,381 |
|
|
|
270,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
4,976,627 |
|
|
|
5,331,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension obligation |
|
|
5,105,558 |
|
|
|
5,072,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
10,082,185 |
|
|
|
10,403,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.10; shares authorized,
40,000,000; shares issued and outstanding,
9,546,593 and 9,169,093 |
|
|
954,659 |
|
|
|
916,909 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
22,180,996 |
|
|
|
22,171,341 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(21,801,912 |
) |
|
|
(21,607,785 |
) |
Treasury stock (80,225 shares, at cost) |
|
|
(385,757 |
) |
|
|
(385,757 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
(75,974 |
) |
|
|
(102,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
872,012 |
|
|
|
991,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
10,954,197 |
|
|
$ |
11,395,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
NET SALES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
611,500 |
|
|
$ |
736,475 |
|
Service sales |
|
|
2,060,146 |
|
|
|
2,612,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
|
2,671,646 |
|
|
|
3,348,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
714,963 |
|
|
|
987,944 |
|
Engineering and software development |
|
|
297,858 |
|
|
|
250,947 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,871,673 |
|
|
|
2,004,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs and Operating Expenses |
|
|
2,884,494 |
|
|
|
3,243,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
(212,848 |
) |
|
|
105,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME |
|
|
18,721 |
|
|
|
12,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(194,127 |
) |
|
|
117,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
(194,127 |
) |
|
$ |
117,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(194,127 |
) |
|
$ |
117,512 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
331,589 |
|
|
|
276,659 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
7,470 |
|
Share based compensation expense |
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Pension assets |
|
|
(23,823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
14,571 |
|
|
|
(23,823 |
) |
Unrealized gain on sale of investments |
|
|
41,060 |
|
|
|
5,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
187,615 |
|
|
|
(12,642 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
17,970 |
|
|
|
(5,539 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(5,324 |
) |
|
|
(46,444 |
) |
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(58,854 |
) |
|
|
(9,480 |
) |
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
(339,643 |
) |
|
|
24,979 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
122,340 |
|
|
|
104,404 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(89,143 |
) |
|
|
(15,277 |
) |
Pension obligation |
|
|
29,467 |
|
|
|
113,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
73,198 |
|
|
|
539,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(184,626 |
) |
|
|
(121,113 |
) |
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(200,464 |
) |
|
|
(304,197 |
) |
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(55,345 |
) |
|
|
(20,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities: |
|
|
(440,435 |
) |
|
|
(445,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
25,905 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
|
25,905 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(341,332 |
) |
|
|
93,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
713,342 |
|
|
|
845,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
372,010 |
|
|
$ |
939,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net |
|
$ |
4,425 |
|
|
$ |
404 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
1,401 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The accompanying unaudited financial statements include all adjustments of a normal and
recurring nature which, in the opinion of Companys management, are necessary to present fairly the
Companys financial position as of March 31, 2008, the results of its operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
2007.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These condensed financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
The results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full years operation.
(2) |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
The major classifications of property and equipment at March 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007
were: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
128,390 |
|
|
$ |
795,905 |
|
Computer hardware and software |
|
|
1,276,377 |
|
|
|
2,093,026 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
1,041,512 |
|
|
|
1,677,783 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
1,385,797 |
|
|
|
1,388,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,832,076 |
|
|
$ |
5,955,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded depreciation expense of $68,125.
Depreciation expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was $62,877. |
|
(3) |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
The Companys share-based compensation consists of restricted stock and stock options,
generally vesting over periods ranging from one to four years. For the quarter ended March 31,
2008, the company awarded restricted stock grants totaling 320,000 shares vesting over three
years. There were no grants of stock options. During the first quarter of 2007 there were no
awards of restricted stock or stock option grants. |
|
|
|
A summary of the status of the Companys stock option plan as of March 31, 2008 is presented
below: |
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Term (Yrs) |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,257,943 |
|
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
548,550 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(57,500 |
) |
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,630 |
) |
Canceled |
|
|
(36,280 |
) |
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,164,163 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
513,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,037,878 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
512,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2008, there was $61,170 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock options granted under the Plan and $223,500 of unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested restricted stock grants. The compensation cost for stock options will be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years. The compensation costs of restricted stock
will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
(4) |
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the first quarter of 2008 and 2007 was as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(194,127 |
) |
|
$ |
117,512 |
|
Reclassification to net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
22,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized change pension |
|
|
(36,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized change on investments |
|
|
41,060 |
|
|
|
5,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(167,192 |
) |
|
$ |
122,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS) |
|
|
|
SFAS 128 Earnings Per Share requires the Company to calculate net income (loss) per share
based on basic and diluted net income (loss) per share, as defined. Basic EPS excludes
dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into
common stock. The dilutive effect of outstanding options issued by the Company are reflected
in diluted EPS using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, options will
only have a dilutive effect when the average market price of common stock during the period
exceeds the exercise price of the options. |
9
Calculations of Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(194,127 |
) |
|
$ |
117,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
9,346,912 |
|
|
|
8,855,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(194,127 |
) |
|
$ |
117,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
9,346,912 |
|
|
|
8,855,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional dilutive effect of stock options and
warrants after application of treasury stock method |
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding |
|
|
9,346,912 |
|
|
|
9,422,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share assuming full obligation |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no dilutive effects of stock options in the first quarter of 2008, as the effect would
have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss incurred.
(6) |
|
INDEMNIFICATION OF CUSTOMERS |
|
|
|
Our agreements with customers generally require us to indemnify the customer against claims
that our software infringes third party patent, copyright, trademark or other proprietary
rights. Such indemnification obligations are generally limited in a variety of
industry-standard respects, including our right to replace an infringing product. As of March
31, 2008 we had not experienced any material losses related to these indemnification
obligations and no material claims with respect thereto were outstanding. We do not expect
significant claims related to these indemnification obligations, and consequently, we have
not established any related reserves. |
|
(7) |
|
BENEFIT PLANS |
|
|
|
The Company sponsors an employee incentive savings plan under Section 401(k) for all eligible
employees. The Companys contributions to the plan are discretionary. There were no
contributions to the plan for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007. |
10
The Company also sponsors an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP),
which is a non-qualified plan that provides certain key employees defined pension benefits.
Periodic pension expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current Service Cost |
|
$ |
14,438 |
|
|
$ |
68,180 |
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
22,122 |
|
|
|
15,700 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
82,688 |
|
|
|
78,720 |
|
Unrealized change |
|
|
(36,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Expense |
|
$ |
83,001 |
|
|
$ |
162,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid pension obligations of $53,533 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
$49,533 for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit
obligation was 6% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
The Company maintains life insurance covering certain key employees under its Supplemental
Executive Retirement Program with the Company named as beneficiary. The Company intends to
use the death benefits of these policies, as well as loans against the accumulating cash
surrender value of the policies, to fund future pension obligations. The total death benefit
associated with these policies is $10.2 million, with an associated accumulated cash
surrender value of approximately $3,234,000 at March 31, 2008. The accumulated cash surrender
values of these policies at December 31, 2007 was approximately $3,210,000.
The projected pension benefits paid or expected to be paid under this plan are as follows,
assuming retirement at 65 and a life expectancy of 80 years for all participants:
Period Ending December 31, Unless Stated Otherwise,
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2008 |
|
|
53,533 |
|
Q2 - Q4 2008 |
|
|
386,551 |
|
2009 |
|
|
498,192 |
|
2010 |
|
|
498,192 |
|
2011 |
|
|
468,058 |
|
2012 |
|
|
513,842 |
|
2013 - 2016 |
|
|
2,717,021 |
|
The Company has a contractual obligation to maintain certain health benefits for two of its
former executive officers. These benefits are accounted for as Post Retirement Healthcare
Benefits, (PRHB).
11
Periodic PRHB expensed and paid for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2007 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current Service Cost |
|
$ |
1,892 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRHB Expense |
|
$ |
3,413 |
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The projected PRHB paid or expected to be paid are as follows:
Period Ending December 31, Unless Stated Otherwise,
|
|
|
|
|
Q1 2008 |
|
|
3,413 |
|
Q2 - Q4 2008 |
|
|
10,239 |
|
2009 |
|
|
13,649 |
|
2010 |
|
|
13,649 |
|
2011 |
|
|
13,649 |
|
2012 |
|
|
13,649 |
|
2013 - 2016 |
|
|
37,096 |
|
12
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Managements Discussion and Analysis contains statements that are forward-looking. Such
statements are identified by the use of words like plans, expects, intends, believes,
will, anticipates, estimates and other words of similar meaning in conjunction with, among
other things, discussions of future operations, financial performance, the Companys strategy for
growth, product development, regulatory approvals, market position and expenditures.
Forward-looking statements are based on managements expectations as of the date of this report.
The Company cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be accurate, although the
Company believes that it has been reasonable in its expectations and assumptions. Forward-looking
statements are subject to the risks identified in Issues and Risks and elsewhere in this report.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and are advised to
review the risks identified in Issues and Risks and elsewhere in this report. The Company has no
obligation to update forward-looking statements.
Overview
Sales of $2,672,000 for Veramarks first quarter ended March 31, 2008 decreased $677,000 from sales
of $3,349,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. First quarter 2007 sales had included a
non-recurring $570,000 component of a managed service contract initiated in late 2006. The net
loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of $194,000, or $0.02 per share, compared with a net
income of $118,000, or $0.01 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2007.
Orders booked for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 were virtually unchanged from the first quarter
of 2007, with increased orders for VeraSMART and Managed Services offset by lower orders for eCAS
and Quantum maintenance renewals. Support for the Quantum Series, VeraSMARTs predecessor, was
discontinued at the end of 2007.
Effective January 1, 2008 Anthony C. Mazzullo joined Veramark as President and Chief Executive
Officer. Since that time, the Companys management team and organizational structure have been
realigned with initial benefits of lower annual labor expenses and the creation of positions for
new management talent that was subsequently hired. One-time expenses of approximately
$130,000 associated primarily with severance payments were incurred during the quarter negatively
impacting net income and cash flow. The new management believes that the restructuring was
necessary in order to better position the company to execute a more compelling market strategy.
Labor expense savings offset somewhat by expense associated with new positions created to fill
critical needs is expected to have a net reduction in the annualized expense rate.
Sales
Sales of VeraSMART product and services increased 32% for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 from the
same quarter of 2007, accounting for 33% of total sales. New installations of VeraSMART were
completed with Abbott Labs, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Florida, Northrop Grumman, and the Sacramento
Municipal Utility District, among others. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2008 we announced
the release of VeraSMART 7.0 offering innovative Telecom Expense Management (TEM) features, user
configurable dashboards, and enhanced support for diverse enterprise and carrier networks.
13
Sales of eCAS products and services for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 decreased 18% as compared
with the same quarter of 2007. The decrease in eCAS sales reflects lower sales through our largest
channel of distribution for eCAS, Avaya Inc., and their master distributor channel partners. In
February 2008, Veramark announced the signing of a distribution agreement with Ingram Micro
enabling eCAS to be accessible to Ingram Micros network of reseller customers in the United States
beginning March 1, 2008.
Revenues generated from managed service contracts for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 decreased
45% from the prior year due to the non- recurring portion of 2007 revenue associated with the
contract discussed above. After adjustment for that event, recurring revenues from existing managed
service contracts increased 48% from the first quarter of 2007.
Cost of Sales
Gross margin (sales less cost of sales) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of $1,957,000
decreased $404,000 from the gross margin of $2,361,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
primarily due to the lower sales volume. Gross margins as a percentage of sales improved however,
representing 73% of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 versus 70% of sales for the same
quarter of 2007, reflecting lower costs associated with the provisioning of managed service
contracts.
Operating Expenses
Engineering and software development expenses, net of the effect of software capitalization
increased 19% from $251,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 to $298,000 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 due to a decrease in the level of software development costs capitalized. The chart
below summarizes the Companys development efforts for the first quarters of 2008 and 2007,
itemizing gross engineering and software development costs incurred, software development costs
capitalized, and the resulting net engineering and software developments costs included in the
statement of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross expenditures for engineering and software development |
|
$ |
498,000 |
|
|
$ |
555,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Software development costs capitalized |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
(304,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses for engineering and software development
included in the Companys statement of operations |
|
$ |
298,000 |
|
|
$ |
251,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses for selling, general and administrative (SG&A) functions decreased 7%, or $132,000, from
$2,004,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 to $1,872,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
The decrease was principally due to the restructuring efforts undertaken throughout the
organization referred to in the overview section of this report, the effect of which resulted in
reductions in salaries, benefits and pension expenses.
14
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our total cash position (cash plus short term investments) of $2,049,000 at March 31, 2008 compares
with a total cash position of $2,206,000 at December 31, 2007 and $1,910,000 at March 31, 2007. The
reduction in cash position includes the effect of severance and termination costs associated with
the restructuring and reorganization efforts referred to earlier in this document. Accounts
receivable of $1,113,000, net of a bad debt reserve of $33,000, at March 31, 2008 compares with
accounts receivable of $1,303,000, net of a bad debt reserve of $30,000 at December 31, 2007.
There were no significant write-offs or changes to customer payment trends during the first quarter
of 2008.
Prepaid expenses at March 31, 2008 of $260,000 increased $6,000 from the December 31, 2007 balance
of $254,000. The increase is attributable to the renewal and payment of 2008 business insurances,
the economic benefit of which extends over the balance of the year.
Capital equipment additions for the first quarter of 2008 totaled $55,000 which compared with
$20,000 of capital additions during the first quarter of 2007. During the first quarter we
wrote-off $2,178,000 of capital assets, primarily computer equipment, office furniture, and
fixtures which were either obsolete, or no longer in service. The majority of those assets were
fully depreciated, with the net residual book value of these assets totaling $15,000, which was
charged against operations in the quarter. At March 31, 2008 the net book value of property and
equipment was $494,000, which compared with $521,000 at December 31, 2007.
Software development costs capitalized and reported in the balance sheet at March, 31, 2008 of
$2,975,000, decreased 2% from the December 31, 2007 balance of $3,038,000. For the first three
months of 2008 we capitalized $200,000 of software development costs, down from $304,000 for the
first three months of 2007. Amortization of previously capitalized costs totaled $263,000 through
March 31, 2008 as compared with amortization costs of $214,000 for the same period a year ago.
Pension assets of $3,234,000 at March 31, 2008 increased $24,000 from the December 31, 2007 balance
of $3,210,000. Pension assets consist entirely of the current cash surrender values on a series of
company-owned life insurance policies designed to fund future pension obligations. These cash
surrender values are also available for use in meeting current operational activities if required.
Total current liabilities decreased 7%, or $354,000, from the December 31, 2007 balance of
$5,331,000 to $4,977,000 at March 31, 2008. Accrued compensation costs decreased $354,000 primarily
due to a reduction in accruals associated with the December 31, 2007 retirement of the companys
former Chief Executive Officer. Additionally, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities were
reduced by $59,000 and $90,000, respectively, from December 31, 2007 balances. Offsetting those
reductions was an increase of $123,000 in deferred revenues, primarily in the form of additional
maintenance contracts. Deferred revenues represent services for which the company has billed
customers, but has not yet performed the contracted service, and as such, represent a portion of
our current backlog. It is expected that the majority of those services, consisting largely of
maintenance and support, training and installation services and will be performed over the next
twelve months and recognized as revenue.
Stockholders equity at March 31, 2008 of $872,000 represents a decrease of $120,000 from the
December 31, 2007 total of $992,000 and includes the first quarter 2008 net loss of $194,000.
During the first quarter of 2008 there were 57,500 stock options exercised by employees.
15
In light of the Companys cash and investment position, overall liquidity and absence of debt,
it is the opinion of management that sufficient resources exist to fully fund current operations
and development programs for the next twelve months and beyond.
16
Accounting Pronouncements
|
1) |
|
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS
159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value at specified election dates. This Statement applies to all entities,
including not-for-profit organizations. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an
entitys first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. As such, the Company
adopted these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
Adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. |
|
|
2) |
|
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective as of the beginning of
the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. As such, the Company adopted
these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. Adoption of
SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. |
|
|
3) |
|
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R)
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its
financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in
the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and determines what information
to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As
such, the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2009. The Company does not expect adoption of SFAS 141(R) to have a
material effect on its financial statements. |
|
|
4) |
|
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As such, the Company is required to adopt
these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. The Company
does not expect SFAS 160 to have a material effect on its financial statements. |
|
|
5) |
|
In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (SAB 110). SAB
110 permits companies to continue to use the simplified
method, under certain circumstances, in estimating the expected term of plain vanilla
options beyond December 31, 2007. SAB 110 updates guidance provided in SAB 107 that
previously stated that the Staff would not expect a company to use the simplified method
for share option grants after December 31, 2007. Adoption of SAB 110 did not expect to
have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. |
17
|
6) |
|
In March 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ratified Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) Issue No. 06-10, Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Agreements. EITF 06-10 provides guidance for determining a liability for the
postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and measurement of the associated
asset on the basis of the terms of the collateral assignment agreement. EITF 06-10 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. As such, the Company adopted
these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. Adoption of
EITF 06-10 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements. |
18
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect amounts reported therein. The most significant of these involving difficult or complex
judgments include:
|
|
|
Revenue recognition |
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of software development costs |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Pension liability |
In each situation, management is required to make estimates about the effects of matters or
future events that are inherently uncertain.
The Companys revenue consists of revenues from the licensing of software to resellers and end
user customers; fees for services rendered to include installation, training, implementation, and
customer maintenance contracts; and the outsourcing or hosting of services.
The Company recognizes software license revenue under Statement of Position No 97-2 Software
Revenue Recognition as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, Software Revenue Recognition
With Respect to Certain Transactions, Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables, and related interpretations.
Sales of licensed software sold directly to an end user customer are recognized as revenue
upon delivery and installation of the software at the customer site. Sales of licensed software to
a reseller are recognized as revenue when delivery is made to the reseller. Regardless of the form
of sale no revenue is recognized without persuasive evidence of an arrangement existing. Persuasive
evidence is determined to be a signed purchase order received from the customer or an equivalent
form for those customers lacking a formalized purchase order system. In the case of VeraSMART
sales, a software license agreement signed by both parties is often required in addition to a
purchase order or equivalent. Additionally, revenue is only recognized when a selling price is
fixed or determinable and collectibility of the receivable is deemed to be probable.
Service revenues such as training, installation and implementation are recognized when the
service is complete and acknowledged by the customer, regardless as to whether the sale is on a
direct basis or through a reseller arrangement.
Fees charged to customers for post-contract Customer Support are recognized ratably over the
term of the contract. Costs related to maintenance obligations are expensed as incurred.
Sales which constitute a multiple-element arrangement are accounted for by determining if the
elements can be accounted for as separate accounting units, and if so, by applying values to those
units for which there is vendor specific objective evidence of their fair value. We use the
residual method to apply any remaining balance to the remaining elements of the arrangement. More
specifically, this methodology applies when there is embedded maintenance (post-contract customer
support) involved in the sale of a software license, or when the sale of a software license is made
in conjunction with installation services. In the latter case, the recognition of the software
license is deferred until installation is completed.
19
The Companys revenues generated through hosting solutions are recognized using the
proportional performance method. Revenues are recognized in the month services are rendered and
earned under service
agreements with clients where service fees are fixed or determinable. Contracts can be
terminated with 90 days written notice. All services provided by us through the date of
cancellation are due and payable under the contract terms.
The Company believes its revenue recognition policies are appropriate, in all circumstances,
and that its policies are reflective of complexities arising from customer arrangements involving
such features as maintenance, warranty agreements, license agreements, and other normal course of
business arrangements.
The Company capitalizes software development costs when technological feasibility has been
established for the software in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Such capitalized costs are amortized on a
product-by-product basis over their economic life or the ratio of current revenues to current and
anticipated revenues from such software, whichever provides the greater amortization. The Company
periodically reviews the carrying value of capitalized software development costs and impairments
are recognized in the results of operations when the expected future undiscounted operating cash
flow derived from the capitalized software is less than its carrying value. Should the Company
inaccurately determine when a product reaches technological feasibility or the economic life of a
product, results could differ materially from those reported. Veramark uses what it believes are
reasonable assumptions and where applicable, established valuation techniques in making its
estimates.
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the
potential inability of its customers to make required payments. Management specifically analyzes
accounts receivable, historical bad debts, credit concentrations and customer payment terms when
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
The Company sponsors an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP), which is a
nonqualified plan that provides certain key employees a defined pension benefit. In order to
properly record the net present value of future pension obligations a number of assumptions are
required to be made by Companys management. These assumptions include years of service, life
expectancies, and projected future salary increases for each participant. In addition, management
must make assumptions with regard to the proper long-term interest and liability discount rates to
be applied to these future obligations.
Should the Company need to alter any of these assumptions, there is the potential for
significant adjustments to future projected pension liabilities.
Issues and Risks
The following factors, among others discussed herein and in the Companys filings under the
Act, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth
or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: economic, competitive, governmental and
technological factors, increased operating costs, failure to obtain necessary outside
financing, risks related to natural disasters and financial market fluctuations. Such
factors also include:
Intellectual Property Rights
Veramark regards its software as proprietary and attempts to protect it with a combination of
copyright, trademark and trade secret protections, employee and third-party non-disclosure
agreements and other
20
methods of protection. Despite those precautions, it may be possible for
unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of Veramarks products, reverse engineer
or obtain and use information that
Veramark regards as proprietary. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect
Veramarks proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Any
misappropriation of Veramarks intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on
its business and results of operations. Furthermore, although Veramark take steps to prevent
unlawful infringement of others intellectual property, there can be no assurance that third
parties will not assert infringement claims against Veramark in the future with respect to
current or future products. Any such assertion could require Veramark to enter into royalty
arrangements or result in costly litigation.
New Products and Services
Veramark has made significant investments in research, development and marketing for new
products, services and technologies, including the VeraSMART® software offering and its
service bureau outsourced solutions. Significant revenue from new product and service
investments may not be achieved for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, if such
products or services are profitable, operating margins may not be as high as the
margins historically experienced by Veramark.
Declines in Demand for Software
If overall market demand for software and computer devices generally, as well as call
accounting software or enterprise level products specifically, declines, or corporate
spending for such products declines, Veramarks revenue will be adversely affected.
Additionally, Veramarks revenues would be unfavorably impacted if customers reduce their
purchases of new software products or upgrades to existing products.
Product Development Schedule
The development of software products is a complex and time-consuming process. New products
and enhancements to existing products can require long development and testing periods.
Significant delays in new product releases or significant problems in creating new products,
particularly any delays in future releases of the VeraSMART® suite of products, could
adversely affect Veramark revenues.
Competition
Veramark experiences intensive competition across all markets for its products and services.
Some competing firms have greater name recognition and more financial, marketing and
technological resources than Veramark. These competitive pressures may result in decreased
sales volumes, price reductions, and/or increased operating costs, such as for marketing and
sales incentives, resulting in lower revenues, gross margins and operating income.
Marketing and Sales
Veramarks marketing and distribution strategy is founded on building mutually beneficial
relationships with companies that have established distribution networks. Some sell
privately labeled, customized products developed and manufactured by Veramark to their
specific specifications, while others resell Veramarks products. Any loss of the continued
availability of those relationships could have a material adverse effect on Veramarks
business and results of operations.
21
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has no long-term bank debt obligations. The Company has no foreign currency
exchange risk and has no foreign currency exchange contracts.
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
Based upon an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (Chief Accounting Officer) concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting,
that occurred during the period covered by this report, that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
The Companys disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial
reporting provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that all deficiencies in design or
operation of those control systems, or all instances of errors or fraud, will be prevented or
detected. Those control systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the goals
of those systems in light of the Companys resources and nature of the Companys business
operations. The Companys disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting remain subject to risks of human error and the risk that controls can be circumvented for
wrongful purposes by one or more individuals in management or non-management positions.
22
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 5: Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Chief Financial Officer have
provided the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections
302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications have been filed as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 and Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2, respectively.
Item 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
(I) Registrants Condensed Financial Statements for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and 2007 are set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
(31.1) CEO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(31.2) CFO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.1) CEO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32.2) CFO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
REGISTRANT
Date: May 14, 2008
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony C. Mazzullo
Anthony C. Mazzullo
|
|
|
President and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 14, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald C. Lundy
Ronald C. Lundy
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and CFO |
|
|
24