United States
Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C.  20549

Form 10-Q

ý  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2005

o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-27024

METRO ONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

11200 Murray Scholls Place, Beaverton, Oregon  97007

(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

(503) 643-9500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No ý

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of November 14, 2004: 24,947,552 shares, no par value per share.

METRO ONE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10 - Q

Metro One Telecommunications, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Metro One Telecommunications, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Metro One Telecommunications, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Metro One Telecommunications, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information.  Accordingly, certain financial information and footnotes have been omitted or condensed.  In the opinion of management, the condensed financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods.  These condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.  The results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results for future interim periods or the entire fiscal year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Metro One Telecommunications, Inc. and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Advertising

Costs of advertising are expensed as incurred except for commercial advertising production costs, which are expensed at the time the related commercials are first run.  Advertising expense was approximately $900,000 and $2.7 million in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005, respectively, and approximately $2.5 million and $14.4 million in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004, respectively.  These expenses were primarily related to marketing and promotion of our Infone service and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Short-term Investments

Short-term investments, if any, are carried at fair value and typically consist of available-for-sale auction rate securities (“ARS”) that we classify as current assets based upon our intent and ability to use these funds as necessary to satisfy short-term liquidity requirements.  We had no such short-term investments at September 30, 2005.  Our portfolio at December 31, 2004 consisted of two types of ARS.  We held $15.4 million of investment-grade taxable auction rate notes of municipal issuers, which are debt-securities with variable interest rates that reset through a Dutch auction with principal traded at par.  The rate typically resets on a periodic basis, usually between 7 and 49 days.  Actual maturities of the underlying securities are greater than ten years.  In addition, at December 31, 2004, we held $10.0 million of auction rate preferred securities which consist of shares of closed-end investment funds invested in long-term fixed income securities.  These funds generally issue auction rate preferred shares that provide liquidity at par value every 28 days through the auction rate market.  The reset rate for both types of ARS is set by a modified Dutch auction process in which bids are filled from lowest yield bid to highest; the highest bid cleared sets the rate for all winning bidders.  Although the underlying securities have long-term contractual maturities, we can sell or buy the securities at par on auction dates.  Thus, they are classified as short-term investments since they are intended to be available to fund current operations.  Fair values are based on quoted market prices and at December 31, 2004, the fair value of these securities approximated their carrying value.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have elected to account for stock options and shares issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) according to Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and to furnish the pro forma disclosures required under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.”  Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized in the financial statements related to stock options issued under our Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) or shares issued under our ESPP.

4

If compensation cost on stock options granted and ESPP shares issued in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 under the Plan had been determined based on the fair value of the options and ESPP shares as of the grant or issue date in a method consistent with that described in SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” our net loss and net loss per share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below for the three and nine month periods ended September 30:

In March 2005, our Board of Directors accelerated vesting on all of the then outstanding stock options, of which all had fair market values that were less than the exercise prices at that time.  In determining to accelerate the vesting of these options, the Board considered the effect on our reported stock option expense in future periods, the comparability of our statements of operations in prior and subsequent periods, and the potential benefit to Metro One and our shareholders in retaining the services of affected officers and employees.  The pro forma expense included in the stock-based compensation expense noted above associated with the accelerated vesting was approximately $1,592,000.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”) an amendment of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows,” which requires companies to recognize in their statements of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees.  We will adopt SFAS No. 123R in our first quarter of 2006.  We are still evaluating the effects that adoption of this statement will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

2.     Restructuring Charges and Exit Activities

In June 2005, we announced that, as part of our ongoing corporate-wide program to cut costs and align expenses with reduced revenues, we would be closing and consolidating the operations of 11 of our call centers during the second and third quarters of 2005.  We closed three call centers in the second quarter of 2005 and we closed eight call centers in the third quarter of 2005, with call volume being transferred to our remaining 20 call centers.

5

Costs incurred to close the eight call centers and costs related to other restructuring activities during the third quarter and our cumulative costs for restructuring activities to date are shown in the following table.  We do not expect significant additional costs related to the consolidation of the 11 call centers closed to date.

The following summarizes the provisions, payments, adjustments and liability for costs associated with our cost reduction efforts for the periods shown (in thousands):

As discussed below in Note 5. Significant Events, in October 2005, we received notice that Nextel would be terminating its contract with us.  In response to this notice, we have accelerated our ongoing efforts to reduce costs and restructure our operations to align costs with revenue.  These efforts include discontinuing our Infone service, our retail product offering, accelerating the closing of underutilized call centers and significantly scaling back the number of employees and space at our corporate office.  We have closed one additional call center, reduced corporate headcount by 42 employees and incurred approximately $421,000 of severance costs subsequent to September 30, 2005 related to these efforts.  We expect to incur additional severance, call center exit costs, and other costs associated with the closing of additional call centers and other restructuring activities.  We are engaged in continuing discussions with Nextel with regard to the timing of their transition of call volume away from us; therefore, our plans, and consequently, our ability to estimate future costs associated with those plans, are still being developed and the amount and timing of associated future costs cannot be accurately estimated at this time.

3.     Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding options to purchase common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.  Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were the same for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2005 and 2004 because inclusion of the potential dilutive effect of common stock options in

6

the calculation would be anti-dilutive.  There were no adjustments to net loss for the calculation of both basic and diluted net loss per share for all periods.

Options to purchase 2,874,000 and 2,999,000 shares of common stock were outstanding at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, because their effect would be anti-dilutive.

4.     Commitments and Contingencies

We are party to various legal actions and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.  We believe the disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

From time to time, in the normal course of our business, we issue standby letters of credit and bank guarantees.  At September 30, 2005, we had one letter of credit outstanding in the amount of $6,860,000 related to our workers’ compensation program.  The letter of credit is secured by a certificate of deposit for the same amount that is recorded as restricted cash.  This letter of credit expires in April 2006.

5.     Significant Events

In February 2005, we entered into a Master Services Agreement for Directory Assistance Services (the “Services Agreement”) with Nextel Operations, Inc., acting on behalf of certain affiliates (collectively “Nextel”) of Nextel Communications, Inc.  The Services Agreement superceded our previous services agreement dated in June 1999.  Under the Services Agreement, we agreed to provide directory assistance services to Nextel’s customers on a non-exclusive basis.  Under the agreement, Nextel could transition call volume away from us on short notice and/or terminate services entirely.

In October 2005, we received notification from Nextel that it would be terminating the Services Agreement discussed above effective January 9, 2006.  A plan for transition of services is currently under discussion between the parties.  Nextel represented approximately 75% and 73% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, and 73% and 51% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.  As a result, in the near term, we will be consolidating and reducing our operations including closing call centers and reducing our number of employees both in call centers and in corporate and administrative staff.  Termination of this contract will have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and cash flows and raises substantial doubt as to whether we can continue to operate as a going concern.  If we are unable to reduce our costs in line with continuing revenues, increase our revenues to support our reduced cost structure or obtain additional financing, we may be forced to cease operations.  As a result of the notification from Nextel, we will evaluate our fixed assets and intangible assets for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and SFAS No. 142 during the fourth quarter of 2005.

Our contract with AT&T Wireless expired in December 2003, and our negotiations did not result in a new contract.  The call volume from AT&T Wireless transitioned away during the second and third quarters of 2004.  AT&T Wireless accounted for approximately 5% and 34% of our revenues in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

In August 2005, we ceased service for ALLTEL Communications, Inc. (“ALLTEL”).  ALLTEL represented approximately 6% and 10% of the our revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, and represented approximately 14% and 10% of our revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

7

ITEM 2.                  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

All statements and trend analyses contained in this item and elsewhere in this report on Form 10-Q relative to the future constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These forward-looking statements may, but do not necessarily, also include words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “continue” or similar expressions.  Forward-looking statements are not guarantees.  They involve known and unknown business and economic risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  These risks, uncertainties and other factors include the expiration or pricing of customer contracts, the successful execution of our cost reduction efforts and current business strategy, and our ability to generate cash from operations, and other risks, including those discussed in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) and those described in our other filings with the SEC, press releases and other communications.  Any forward-looking statement in this report reflects our expectations at the time of this report only.  We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview

We develop and provide Enhanced Directory Assistance® and other information services for the telecommunications industry.  We contract primarily with wireless carriers to provide our services to their subscribers.

Typically, under our wholesale contracts, carriers agree to route some or all of their directory assistance calls to us.  We offer our services to multiple carriers within the same market.  When a carrier’s subscribers dial a typical directory assistance number, such as “411,” “555-1212” or “00,” the calls are routed to and answered by our operators identifying the service by that carrier’s brand name.

Each carrier customer establishes its own directory assistance fee structure for its subscribers.  Wireless subscribers typically pay fees to their carrier ranging from $1.00 to $1.50 plus airtime charges for our services.  We bear no subscriber collection risk with respect to carrier subscribers; however, there may be collection risk to the extent growth and profitability in the telecommunications industry decreases and to the extent we provide services to other types of customers, including businesses, governmental units.

We charge our customers on a per call basis.  Prices for services provided to other types of customers, including individual consumers, businesses, governmental units or other callers, may vary based on the nature of the service, volume and other circumstances.

Competition in the telecommunications industry, and in the directory assistance market in which we participate, is intense.  With slowing subscriber growth and declining revenue per user, carriers are looking to lower their costs of providing directory assistance and other services through, among other ways, outsourcing to low cost domestic or overseas operators and utilizing automation to reduce costs.  In response to these and other issues, in May 2003, we launched Infone, intended to provide enhanced directory and personal assistant services directly to consumers.

The launch of Infone was accompanied by a significant nationwide marketing and promotion campaign designed to build brand awareness and encourage customers to sign up for Infone.  During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005, we spent approximately $900,000 and $2.7 million, respectively, on such marketing and promotion campaigns.  In October 2005, due to our inability to attract a significant number of users and generate significant revenues, we decided to discontinue offering our Infone service.  Because the costs to operate and support Infone have had a significant adverse impact on our financial position, operating results and cash flows, we expect the discontinuance of Infone will further our efforts to reduce costs.

8

Significant Events

In February 2005, we entered into a Master Services Agreement for Directory Assistance Services (the “Services Agreement”) with Nextel Operations, Inc., acting on behalf of certain affiliates (collectively “Nextel”) of Nextel Communications, Inc.  The Services Agreement superceded our previous services agreement dated in June 1999.  Under the Services Agreement, we agreed to provide directory assistance services to Nextel’s customers on a non-exclusive basis.  Under the agreement, Nextel could transition call volume away from us on short notice and/or terminate services entirely.

In October 2005, we received notification from Nextel that it would be terminating the Services Agreement discussed above effective January 9, 2006.  A plan for transition of services is currently under discussion between the parties.  Nextel represented approximately 75% and 73% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, and 73% and 51% of our revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.  As a result, in the near term, we will be discontinuing our Infone service, our retail product offering, accelerating the closing of underutilized call centers and significantly scaling back the number of employees and space at our corporate office.  We have closed one additional call center, reduced corporate headcount by 42 employees and incurred approximately $421,000 of severance costs subsequent to September 30, 2005, related to these efforts.  We expect to incur additional severance, call center exit costs, and other costs associated with the closing of additional call centers and other restructuring activities.  We are engaged in continuing discussions with Nextel with regard to the timing of their transition of call volume away from us; therefore, our plans, and consequently, our ability to estimate future costs associated with those plans, are still being developed, and the amount and timing of associated future costs cannot be accurately estimated at this time.  Termination of this contract will have a significant adverse impact on our results of operations and cash flows which raises substantial doubt as to whether or not we can continue to operate as a going concern.  If we are unable to reduce our costs in line with continuing revenues, increase our revenues to support our reduced cost structure or obtain additional financing, we may be forced to cease operations.  Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, our financial advisor, continues to assist the Board of Directors in reviewing its financial plans and exploring avenues available to enhance shareholder value.

Our contract with AT&T Wireless expired in December 2003, and our negotiations did not result in a new contract.  The call volume from AT&T Wireless transitioned away during the second and third quarters of 2004.  AT&T Wireless accounted for approximately 5% and 34% of our revenues in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

In August 2005, we ceased service for ALLTEL Communications, Inc. (“ALLTEL”).  ALLTEL represented approximately 6% and 10% of the our revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, and represented approximately 14% and 10% of our revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.

Results of Operations

This table shows selected items from our statements of operations expressed as a percentage of revenues:

9

Comparison of third quarter 2005 to third quarter 2004

Revenues decreased 30.6% to $19.2 million from $27.7 million.  Call volume decreased to approximately 59 million calls from approximately 60 million calls.  These decreases resulted primarily from lower call volume from AT&T Wireless whose transition away from us was substantially completed in the third quarter of 2004, lower call volume from ALLTEL whose transition was substantially completed in the third quarter of 2005 and a reduction in our average revenue per call.  These reductions were partially offset by growth in call volume under other existing contracts and markets.  Our average revenue per call decreased to approximately $0.32 in the third quarter of 2005 from approximately $0.46 per call in the third quarter of 2004.

Direct operating costs consist of salaries, wages, benefits and taxes relating to call center personnel and costs of listings data and content acquisition.  These costs decreased 12.5% to $15.4 million from $17.6 million.  This decrease was primarily due to lower personnel and data costs associated with servicing lower call volumes as well as a decrease in employee benefit costs.  As a percentage of revenues, direct operating costs increased to 80.1% from 63.5%, due primarily to decreased revenues as a result of a reduction in our average revenue per call.

Selling, general and administrative costs decreased 39.5% to $12.8 million from $21.1 million.  This decrease resulted primarily from reductions in marketing and promotion costs of approximately $1.6 million, a reduction in depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $3.9 million resulting from our write-down of fixed assets in the fourth quarter of 2004 and reductions in other general and administrative expenses of approximately $2.8 million resulting from our ongoing corporate-wide program to reduce costs.  As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative costs decreased to 66.5% from 76.3% primarily due to lower depreciation and amortization expenses and lower corporate-wide operating costs.

Restructuring charges in the quarter ended September 30, 2005 consisted primarily of one-time termination benefits paid to employees of $1.1 million, lease termination costs of $786,000and $849,000 of other costs primarily related to the dismantling of the closed call centers resulting from of our ongoing cost reduction plans.  Such charges primarily related to the eight call centers closed during the three months ended September 30, 2005.  Restructuring charges of approximately $1.6 million, primarily related to continuing lease obligations on closed facilities, have been accrued but not paid at September 30, 2005.

Depreciation and amortization expense, a component of selling, general and administrative costs, decreased 71.8% to $1.5 million from $5.4 million and decreased to 8.0% from 19.6% of revenue.  The decrease in depreciation and amortization was due primarily to the write-down of fixed assets in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the overall reduction in acquisition of fixed assets in the last several years as operations have been reduced.

Other income, consisting primarily of interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents, was $235,000 in the third quarter of 2005 compared to $3.1 million in the third quarter of 2004.  In the third quarter of 2004, we received a refund from SBC Communications in the amount of approximately $2.9 million which was the result of a California PUC decision that SBC had overcharged for certain directory assistance data.

Income tax expense in the third quarter of 2005 was approximately $423,000, reflecting a provision for federal income tax expense related to a proposed adjustment by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) relating to a prior year tax return under audit.  Because of our operating losses in the third quarter of 2004, we recorded no income tax expense in that period.

Comparison of the first nine months of 2005 to the first nine months of 2004

Revenues decreased 49.7% to $57.7 million from $114.8 million.  Call volume decreased to approximately 178 million calls from approximately 248 million calls.  These decreases resulted primarily from lower call volume from AT&T Wireless due to expiration of its contract and to a reduction in our average revenue per call.  These reductions were partially offset by growth in call volume under other existing contracts and markets.  Our average revenue per call decreased to approximately $0.32 in the first nine months of 2005 from approximately $0.46 per call in the first nine months of 2004.

10

Direct operating costs decreased 29.6% to $47.4 million from $67.3 million.  This decrease was primarily due to lower personnel and data costs associated with servicing lower call volumes.  As a percentage of revenues, direct operating costs increased to 82.0% from 58.7%, due primarily to decreased revenues as a result of a reduction in our average revenue per call.

Selling, general and administrative costs decreased 42.7% to $41.3 million from $72.1 million.  This decrease resulted primarily from reductions in marketing and promotion costs of approximately $11.7 million, a reduction in depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $11.9 million resulting from our write-down of fixed assets in the fourth quarter of 2004 and reductions in other general and administrative expenses of approximately $7.2 million resulting from our ongoing corporate-wide program to reduce costs.  As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative costs, less restructuring costs increased to 71.6% from 62.8% primarily due to lower revenues.

Restructuring charges in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 consisted primarily of one-time termination benefits paid to employees of $1.2 million, lease termination costs of $1.9 million and $884,000 of other costs primarily related to the dismantling of the closed call centers resulting from of our ongoing cost reduction plans.  Such charges primarily related to the 11 call centers closed during the nine months ended September 30, 2005.

Depreciation and amortization expense, a component of selling, general and administrative costs, decreased 71.4% to $4.7 million from $16.6 million and decreased to 8.2% from 14.4% of revenue.  The decrease in depreciation and amortization was due primarily to the write-down of fixed assets in the fourth quarter of 2004 and the overall reduction in acquisition of fixed assets in the last several years as operations have been reduced.

Other income, consisting primarily of interest income on cash and cash equivalents, was $804,000 in the first nine months of 2005 compared to $3.5 million in the first nine months of 2004.  Other income in the first nine months of 2004 consisted primarily of a refund from SBC Communications in the amount of approximately $2.9 million as noted above, interest income on cash and cash equivalents and other miscellaneous items totaling approximately $605,000.

Income tax expense in the first nine months of 2005 was approximately $343,000, primarily related to the IRS adjustment noted above.  Because of our operating losses in the first nine months of 2004, we recorded no federal income tax expense in that period.  In the first nine months of 2004, income tax expense was approximately $124,000, primarily due to adjustment of prior estimates to actual state income tax returns filed.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2005, we had approximately $28.0 million in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, including $6.9 million of restricted cash, compared to approximately $54.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash, including $4.9 million of restricted cash, at December 31, 2004.  The net decrease of $26.4 million resulted primarily from our operating losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005.  We have no outstanding debt.

Working capital was $28.5 million at September 30, 2005, compared to $61.5 million at December 31, 2004.  This decrease was primarily due to cash used in operations.

Cash flow from operations.  Net cash used in operations was $24.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to net cash provided by operations of $14.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.  This difference of $39.2 million resulted primarily from a decrease in the amount of cash received from customers as a result of decreased revenue and the receipt of a smaller refund of federal income taxes in the first nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine months of 2004, partially offset by decreases in cash paid for advertising and promotion expenses, cash paid to or on behalf of our employees and cash paid to vendors and suppliers.  Cash received from customers decreased by approximately $66.5 million in the first nine months of 2005 and net federal and state income tax refunds decreased by approximately $7.1 million.  Cash paid to or on behalf of employees, cash paid for advertising and promotion and cash paid to vendors and suppliers decreased by approximately $20.9 million, $11.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively in the first nine months of 2005 compared to the first nine months of 2004.

11

Cash flow from investing activities.  Cash provided by investing activities was $21.8 million in the first nine months of 2005 resulting primarily from short-term investments being converted to cash and used in operations, partially offset by capital expenditures for equipment purchased for upgrades of our corporate-wide infrastructure and an increase in cash restricted to secure a letter of credit related to our workers’ compensation program.

Cash flow from financing activities.  In June 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the repurchase of up to 250,000 shares per month of our common stock.  During the third quarter of 2005, we repurchased 151,000 shares of our common stock at an average purchase price of $0.80 per share.  There was no other significant cash expended or generated related to financing activities in the first nine months of 2005.

Future capital needs and resources.  The primary uses of our capital in the near future are expected to be for working capital, payment of costs incurred to restructure our operations, the development or acquisition of technologies, features and content complementary to our business and for general corporate purposes.  These general corporate purposes could include acquisitions, efforts to pursue and market new growth strategies and other corporate development activities.

The termination of our contract with Nextel will have a material adverse impact on our liquidity and financial position.  We are accelerating our restructuring efforts to reduce our operations and related expenses.  We have reduced personnel and closed 11 of our call centers in the last two quarters.  We expect to further reduce our employees and call centers over the next several months in efforts to bring our expenses in line with our remaining revenues after the departure of Nextel.  Because of the significant decrease in revenue we have and will be experiencing, there is substantial doubt as to whether or not our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.  Future operations and restructuring activities as well as activities designed to develop new revenue sources will likely reduce available cash.  If our cost reduction efforts combined with efforts to develop new sources of revenue are not successful, we may be unable to continue operations.  We cannot be certain that we will be able to establish borrowing arrangements or otherwise raise additional capital on terms favorable to us or at all.

On July 20, 2005, we received a notice from the Nasdaq Stock Market stating that for the last 30 consecutive business days, the bid price of our common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for continued inclusion under Marketplace Rule 4450(a)(5).  Under Marketplace Rule 4450(e)(2), we have 180 calendar days, or until January 17, 2006, to regain compliance by having a closing bid price for our common stock of at least $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days.  After the initial 180 calendar day compliance period, we can apply to transfer our listing to The Nasdaq SmallCap Market if, on January 17, 2006, we meet The Nasdaq SmallCap Market initial inclusion criteria set forth in Marketplace Rule 4310(c), except for the $1.00 minimum bid price requirement.  If such a transfer were approved, we would be provided with an additional 180 calendar day compliance period to demonstrate compliance.

On October 21, 2005, we received a Nasdaq Staff Deficiency Letter informing us that we no longer comply with Nasdaq’s independent director and audit committee requirements for continued listing as set forth in Marketplace Rules 4350.  The letter stated that, consistent with Marketplace Rules 4350(c)(1) and 4350(d)(4), we will be provided a cure period until the earlier of our next annual shareholders’ meeting or October 4, 2006, in order to regain compliance.  The letter also stated that, in the event we do not regain compliance within this period, the Staff will provide written notification that our securities will be delisted.

Failure to achieve continued listing on the Nasdaq National Market will likely impact our ability to raise additional capital.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  As such, we are required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that we believe are reasonable based upon the information available.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented.  Management believes that of our significant accounting policies (see Note 1 to the financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004), those governing accounts receivable, the lives and recoverability of the carrying amount of equipment and other long-lived

12

assets, such as existing intangibles, estimates involving the levels of our contingent liabilities for workers’ compensation and medical self-insurance and estimates of current and deferred taxes may involve a higher degree of judgment, estimation and uncertainty.

Accounts receivable.  Our wholesale customer base has primarily consisted of large wireless telephone carriers in the United States.  As such, we have had minimal risk of uncollectibility, at any point in time, related to outstanding accounts receivable with these customers.  We have not experienced significant collection issues or write-offs related to these customers.  Since our accounts receivable are concentrated in relatively few of these wholesale customers, a significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one of them could adversely impact collection of our accounts receivable and therefore have a material adverse effect on our financial position and future operating results.

Long-lived assets.  We evaluate the remaining life and recoverability of equipment and other assets, including patents and trademarks and internally developed software, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.  At such time, we estimate the future cash flows expected from use of such assets and their eventual disposition and, if lower than the carrying amounts, adjust the carrying amount of the assets to their estimated fair value.  Because of our changing business conditions, including lower wholesale prices and dependence on a relatively small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenues, our estimates of future cash flows to be generated from our operations could change materially, resulting in the need for us to record additional impairment charges.  In addition, as a result of our changing business conditions, we expect to adjust personnel, call centers and network capacities.  If any of these activities result in certain of our assets no longer being used in operations, we may need to record an additional impairment charge.  As a result of certain of the circumstances noted above, we evaluated our fixed assets for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” as of December 31, 2004.  We determined that the value of our fixed assets was impaired; thus, in the fourth quarter of 2004, we recorded a $32.2 million write-down of those assets to their estimated fair market value.  As a result of the decision by Nextel to terminate its contract with us, as discussed under Significant Events above, we will evaluate our fixed assets and intangibles for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and SFAS No. 142 in the fourth quarter of 2005.

Self-insurance reserves.  We self-insure a portion of our workers’ compensation and employee medical insurance programs.  We purchase stop loss coverage at varying levels in order to mitigate our potential future losses.  The nature of these liabilities, which may not fully manifest themselves for several years, requires significant judgment.  We evaluate pending workers’ compensation and medical claims periodically to determine the reasonableness of the reserves we have recorded for such claims.  Our evaluation includes estimates of potential incurred-but-unreported claims as well as factors that may cause original estimates of such claims to increase over time, such as available claims data and historical trends and experience, as well as future projections of ultimate losses, expenses, premiums and administrative costs.  We adjust these reserves if events or changes in circumstances indicate that ultimate payments related to the claims will differ significantly from the recorded reserves.  At September 30, 2005, we have reserved approximately $5.4 and $1.3 million related to our workers’ compensation and medical programs, respectively.  While we believe that the amounts reserved for these obligations are reasonable estimated, any significant increase in the number of claims and costs associated with claims made under these plans could have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Income taxes.  Accounting for income taxes requires us to estimate our income taxes in each jurisdiction in which we operate.  Due to differences in the recognition of items included in income for accounting and tax purposes, temporary differences arise which are recorded as deferred tax assets or liabilities.  We estimate the likelihood of recovery of these assets, which is dependent on future levels of profitability and enacted tax rates. As a result, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets.  Should any further amounts be determined not to be recoverable, or assumptions change, we would be required to take a charge, which could have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  We are also subject to examination by the IRS and other taxing authorities.  To the extent that such authorities take exception to a tax position taken on a filed return, we may need to recognize additional income tax expense.  Such amounts could be material to our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”) an amendment of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and
SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows,” which requires companies to recognize in their statements of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to

13

employees.  We will adopt SFAS No. 123R in our first quarter of 2006.  We are still evaluating the effects that adoption of this statement will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 3.                  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Substantially all of our liquid investments are invested in money market instruments, and therefore, the fair market value of these investments is affected by changes in market interest rates.  However, these investments were invested in overnight money market instruments at September 30, 2005 and were redeemable on a daily basis.  All of the underlying investments in the money market fund had maturities of three months or less.  As a result, we believe the market risk arising from our holdings of financial instruments is minimal.  A hypothetical 1% fluctuation in interest rates would not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4.                  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined under
Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) at the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting, that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.                OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2.          UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c)           Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities

(1)           On June 19 2005, the Company publicly announced a share repurchase program that authorized the repurchase of up to 250,000 shares per month of the common stock of the Company.

ITEM 6.                  EXHIBITS

14

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

15