WebFilings | EDGAR view
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
| |
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the quarterly period ended September 25, 2010 |
OR
| |
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| For the transition period from ________ to ________. |
Commission file number 1-34192
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| | |
Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | 94-2896096 (I.R.S. Employer I. D. No.) |
120 San Gabriel Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94086
(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)
(408) 737-7600
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [x] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [x] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| | | |
Large accelerated filer [x] | Accelerated filer [ ] | Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):
YES [ ] NO [x]
As of October 26, 2010 there were 296,060,745 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, of the registrant outstanding.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
INDEX
| | |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | Page |
| | |
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited) | | |
| | |
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010 | | |
| | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009 | | |
| | |
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009 | | |
| | |
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | | |
| | |
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | | |
| | |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | | |
| | |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures | | |
| | |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | | |
| | |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | | |
| | |
Item 1A. Risk Factors | | |
| | |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities | | |
| | |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | | |
| | |
Item 4. Reserved | | |
| | |
Item 5. Other Information | | |
| | |
Item 6. Exhibits | | |
| | |
SIGNATURES | | |
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | |
| September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
| (in thousands) |
ASSETS |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 718,280 | | | $ | 826,512 | |
Accounts receivable, net | 331,347 | | | 339,322 | |
Inventories | 204,207 | | | 206,040 | |
Deferred tax assets | 121,034 | | | 217,017 | |
Income tax refund receivable | 40,578 | | | 83,813 | |
Other current assets | 46,235 | | | 33,909 | |
Total current assets | 1,461,681 | | | 1,706,613 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net | 1,323,192 | | | 1,324,436 | |
Intangible assets, net | 240,815 | | | 194,728 | |
Goodwill | 249,447 | | | 226,223 | |
Other assets | 29,968 | | | 30,325 | |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 3,305,103 | | | $ | 3,482,325 | |
| | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 120,345 | | | $ | 107,797 | |
Income taxes payable | 11,991 | | | 13,053 | |
Accrued salary and related expenses | 144,195 | | | 175,858 | |
Accrued expenses | 47,943 | | | 37,030 | |
Deferred income on shipments to distributors | 32,286 | | | 25,779 | |
Accrual for litigation settlement | — | | | 173,000 | |
Total current liabilities | 356,760 | | | 532,517 | |
Other liabilities | 24,845 | | | 27,926 | |
Income taxes payable | 133,626 | | | 132,400 | |
Deferred tax liabilities | 147,952 | | | 136,524 | |
Long term debt | 300,000 | | | 300,000 | |
Total liabilities | 963,183 | | | 1,129,367 | |
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) | | | |
Stockholders' equity: | | | |
Common stock and capital in excess of par value | 297 | | | 301 | |
Retained earnings | 2,355,323 | | | 2,364,598 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (13,700 | ) | | (11,941 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | 2,341,920 | | | 2,352,958 | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 3,305,103 | | | $ | 3,482,325 | |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
| | | |
Net revenues | $ | 626,139 | | | $ | 449,246 | |
Cost of goods sold (1) | 239,925 | | | 197,619 | |
Gross margin | 386,214 | | | 251,627 | |
Operating expenses: | | | |
Research and development (1) | 127,779 | | | 116,343 | |
Selling, general and administrative (1) | 72,100 | | | 53,496 | |
Intangible asset amortization | 6,013 | | | 1,844 | |
Impairment of long-lived assets | — | | | 8,291 | |
Severance and restructuring expenses (recoveries) | 1,166 | | | (1,561 | ) |
Other operating expenses (income), net | 33 | | | (16,885 | ) |
Total operating expenses | 207,091 | | | 161,528 | |
Operating income | 179,123 | | | 90,099 | |
Interest and other (expense) income, net | (3,676 | ) | | 1,901 | |
Income before provision for income taxes | 175,447 | | | 92,000 | |
Provision for income taxes | 57,897 | | | 50,048 | |
Net income | $ | 117,550 | | | $ | 41,952 | |
| | | |
Earnings per share: | | | |
Basic | $ | 0.39 | | | $ | 0.14 | |
Diluted | $ | 0.39 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
| | | |
Shares used in the calculation of earnings per share: | | | |
Basic | 298,216 | | | 306,276 | |
Diluted | 301,688 | | | 312,162 | |
| | | |
Dividends paid per share | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | 0.20 | |
| | | |
(1) Includes stock-based compensation charges as follows: | | | |
Cost of goods sold | $ | 3,895 | | | $ | 5,461 | |
Research and development | 16,105 | | | 16,741 | |
Selling, general and administrative | 7,139 | | | 4,263 | |
| $ | 27,139 | | | $ | 26,465 | |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net income | $ | 117,550 | | | $ | 41,952 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Stock based compensation | 27,139 | | | 26,465 | |
Depreciation and amortization | 52,134 | | | 36,496 | |
Deferred taxes | 92,635 | | | 17,809 | |
Tax shortfall related to stock based compensation plans | (4,251 | ) | | (4,347 | ) |
Excess tax benefit related to stock based compensation | (1,038 | ) | | (1,983 | ) |
Impairment of long-lived assets | — | | | 8,291 | |
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment | 537 | | | 699 | |
Loss from sale of equity investments | — | | | 149 | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts receivable | 9,541 | | | (21,036 | ) |
Inventories | 4,817 | | | 24,525 | |
Other current assets and income tax refund receivable | 33,482 | | | 10,595 | |
Accounts payable | 11,590 | | | (14,891 | ) |
Income taxes payable | 164 | | | 24,490 | |
Deferred income on shipments to distributors | 6,507 | | | 2,004 | |
Accrued liabilities - goodwill payments above settlement date fair value | (164 | ) | | (453 | ) |
Accrued liabilities - litigation settlement | (173,000 | ) | | — | |
All other accrued liabilities | (19,144 | ) | | (12,250 | ) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | 158,499 | | | 138,515 | |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (38,529 | ) | | (26,463 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment | 535 | | | 340 | |
Other non-current assets | — | | | 953 | |
Acquisitions | (73,107 | ) | | (4,000 | ) |
Proceeds from sales/maturities of available-for-sale securities | — | | | 100,233 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (111,101 | ) | | 71,063 | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Excess tax benefit related to stock based compensation | 1,038 | | | 1,983 | |
Mortgage liability | (3,237 | ) | | (10 | ) |
Repurchase of options | (196 | ) | | (209 | ) |
Proceeds from derivative litigation settlement | — | | | 2,460 | |
Repayment of notes payable | (1,422 | ) | | — | |
Issuance of common stock | (4,863 | ) | | (8,175 | ) |
Repurchase of common stock | (84,483 | ) | | (17,569 | ) |
Dividends paid | (62,467 | ) | | (61,377 | ) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (155,630 | ) | | (82,897 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (108,232 | ) | | 126,681 | |
Cash and cash equivalents: | | | |
Beginning of period | 826,512 | | | 709,348 | |
End of period | $ | 718,280 | | | $ | 836,029 | |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | | | |
Cash (refunded) paid, net during the period for income taxes | $ | (73,885 | ) | | $ | 281 | |
Noncash investing and financing activities: | | | |
Accounts payable related to property, plant, and equipment purchases | $ | 16,696 | | | $ | 18,482 | |
See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements of Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company" or "Maxim") included herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to applicable rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. The year-end condensed balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The results of operations for the three month period ended September 25, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2010.
The Company has a 52-to-53-week fiscal year that ends on the last Saturday in June. Accordingly, every fifth or sixth fiscal year will be a 53-week fiscal year. Fiscal year 2011 is a 52-week fiscal year.
NOTE 2: RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) - Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” This ASU provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. This ASU will be effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved beginning in our second quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3: BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS
The components of inventories consist of:
| | | | | | | |
| September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
Inventories: | (in thousands) |
Raw materials | $ | 17,656 | | | $ | 16,747 | |
Work-in-process | 134,221 | | | 140,497 | |
Finished goods | 52,330 | | | 48,796 | |
| $ | 204,207 | | | $ | 206,040 | |
Property, plant and equipment, net consist of:
| | | | | | | |
| September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
Property, plant and equipment: | (In thousands) |
Land | $ | 87,237 | | | $ | 87,237 | |
Buildings and building improvements | 336,242 | | | 341,734 | |
Machinery and equipment | 1,913,952 | | | 1,872,349 | |
| 2,337,431 | | | 2,301,320 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (1,014,239 | ) | | (976,884 | ) |
| $ | 1,323,192 | | | $ | 1,324,436 | |
NOTE 4: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The FASB established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:
Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
The Company's Level 1 assets and liabilities consist of U.S. Treasury securities and money market funds.
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. The Company uses observable market prices for comparable instruments to value its derivative instruments.
The Company's Level 2 assets and liabilities consist of bank certificates of deposit and foreign currency forward contracts.
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques, as well as significant management judgment or estimation.
The Company's Level 3 assets include assets held for sale.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 25, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements Using |
| Balance as of September 25, 2010 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| (in thousands) |
Assets: | | | | | | | |
Money market funds (1) | $ | 619,291 | | | $ | 616,117 | | | $ | 3,174 | | | $ | — | |
Foreign currency forward contracts, (net) | (279 | ) | | — | | | (279 | ) | | — | |
Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 619,012 | | | $ | 616,117 | | | $ | 2,895 | | | $ | — | |
(1) Included in Cash and Cash Equivalents in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 25, 2010
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 25, 2010 were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Fair Value Measurements Using |
| Balance as of September 25, 2010 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| (in thousands) |
Assets: | | | | | | | |
Assets held for sale (1) | $ | 2,592 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,592 | |
Total assets measured at fair value | $ | 2,592 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,592 | |
(1) Included in Other Assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 25, 2010
The losses recorded during the three months ended September 25, 2010 and the three months ended September 26, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| Total Gains (Losses) for |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Impairment of long-lived assets designated as held for sale during the period | $ | — | | | $ | (8,291 | ) |
Gains on sale of assets previously classified as held for sale | 113 | | | — | |
Total losses recorded for non-recurring measurements | $ | 113 | | | $ | (8,291 | ) |
The Company's non-financial assets were measured and recorded at fair value during the three months ended September 25, 2010 due to previously disclosed events and circumstances, that indicated that the carrying value of the assets or the asset grouping was not recoverable and the Company's decision to hold these assets for sale, resulting in other-than-temporary impairment charges. Most of these asset impairments relate to fab and end-of-line manufacturing assets.
NOTE 5: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Interest Rate Risk
The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company's cash and cash equivalents and the 3.45% fixed rate senior long-term debt issued in June 2010 (See Note 17: Long-Term Debt). The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge the risk of interest rate volatility. At September 25, 2010, the Company maintained a significant portfolio of money market fund investments, which are included in cash and cash equivalents. These money market funds are all available on a daily basis.
Debt Risk
In June 2010, the Company issued $300 million in senior, unsecured debt due in 2013 with an effective interest rate of 3.49% (See Note 17: Long-Term Debt). The debt indenture includes covenants that limit the Company's ability to grant liens on its facilities and to enter into sale and leaseback transactions, which could limit the Company's ability to raise secure debt funding in the future, if needed. In circumstances involving a change of control of the Company followed by a downgrade of the rating of the Company's notes, the Company would be required to make an offer to repurchase these notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company's ability to repurchase the notes in such events may be limited by the Company's then-available financial resources or by the terms of other agreements to which the Company is a party. Although the Company currently has the funds necessary to retire this debt, funds might not be available to repay the notes when they come due in the future.
If the Company fails to pay interest when due, or to repay the notes when due or materially breaches other loan covenants, it would constitute an event of default under the indenture governing the notes which, in turn, may also constitute an event of default under other obligations of the Company. Any event of default under the indenture or other obligations of the Company and any additional obligations and restrictions imposed as a result thereof could negatively impact its financial results.
Foreign Currency Risk
The Company generates revenues in various global markets based on orders obtained in non-U.S. currencies, primarily the Japanese Yen, the British Pound and the Euro. Maxim incurs expenditures denominated in non-US currencies, principally Philippine Pesos and Thailand Baht associated with the Company's manufacturing activities in the Philippines and Thailand, respectively. Maxim is exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates primarily on orders and accounts receivable from sales in these foreign currencies and cash flows for expenditures in the foreign currencies. Maxim has established risk management strategies designed to reduce the impact of reductions in value and volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in the exchange rates for these currencies. These strategies reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of currency exchange movements. Maxim does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. The Company routinely hedges its exposures to certain foreign currencies with various financial institutions in an effort to minimize the impact of certain currency exchange rate fluctuations. If a financial counter-party to any of the Company's hedging arrangement experiences financial difficulties or is otherwise unable to honor the terms of the foreign currency hedge, the Company may experience financial losses.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under ASC No. 815, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings into the same financial statement line as the item being hedged, and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in interest and other (expense) income, net.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC No. 815, gains and losses are recognized in interest income and other, net. All derivatives are foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated assets or liabilities. The gains and losses on these derivatives are largely offset by the changes in the fair value of the assets or liabilities being hedged.
The outstanding notional amounts of hedge contracts, with maximum maturity of 3 months, were as follows for September 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010:
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
| | (in thousands) |
Cash flow hedge contracts | | | | |
Purchase | | $ | 22,971 | | | $ | 3,693 | |
Sell | | (11,044 | ) | | (16,392 | ) |
Other foreign currency hedge contracts | | | | |
Purchase | | 8,219 | | | 7,287 | |
Sell | | (30,988 | ) | | (24,994 | ) |
Net | | $ | (10,842 | ) | | $ | (30,406 | ) |
The location and fair value amounts of the Company's derivative instruments reported in its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 25, 2010 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value of Derivatives Instrument |
| | Balance Sheet Location | | September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
| | | | (in thousands) |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | Accrued expenses | | $ | 156 | | | $ | (235 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | Accrued expenses | | (435 | ) | | (598 | ) |
| | | | | | |
Total derivatives | | Accrued expenses | | $ | (279 | ) | | $ | (833 | ) |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
The following table provides the balances and changes in the accumulated other comprehensive income loss related to derivative instruments during the three months ended September 25, 2010.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
| | (in thousands) |
Beginning balance | | $ | (235 | ) | | $ | — | |
Amount reclassified to income | | 2,510 | | | — | |
Net change-current year other comprehensive income (loss) | | (2,119 | ) | | (235 | ) |
Ending balance | | $ | 156 | | | $ | (235 | ) |
The locations and amounts of non-designated derivative instruments' gains and losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Locations in Financial Statements |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| Accumulated OCI | | Revenues | | Interest income and other net | | Total | | Accumulated OCI | | Revenues | | Interest income and other net | | Total |
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments Gain (loss) in OCI on derivative (effective portion) | $ | (2,119 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (2,119 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss reclassified from accumulated OCI into income(effective portion) | — | | | 1,644 | | | 866 | | | 2,510 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Gain (loss) recognized in income | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (702 | ) | | $ | (702 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,550 | ) | | $ | (1,550 | ) |
Volume of Derivative Activity
Total net U.S. Dollar notional amounts for foreign currency forward contracts, presented by net currency purchase (sell), are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
In United States Dollars | | September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
| | (in thousands) |
Euro | | $ | (11,590 | ) | | $ | (17,874 | ) |
Japanese Yen | | (16,791 | ) | | (17,923 | ) |
British Pound | | 5,010 | | | (3,512 | ) |
Other | | 12,530 | | | 8,903 | |
Total | | $ | (10,841 | ) | | $ | (30,406 | ) |
NOTE 6: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense by type of award, and the resulting tax effect, included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009:
| | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Cost of goods sold | | | |
Stock options | $ | 754 | | | $ | 2,015 | |
Restricted stock units | 2,774 | | | 3,078 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 367 | | | 368 | |
| $ | 3,895 | | | $ | 5,461 | |
Research and development expense | | | |
Stock options | $ | 4,549 | | | $ | 4,131 | |
Restricted stock units | 10,214 | | | 11,197 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 1,342 | | | 1,413 | |
| $ | 16,105 | | | $ | 16,741 | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | | | |
Stock options | $ | 1,629 | | | $ | 1,749 | |
Restricted stock units | 5,158 | | | 2,378 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 352 | | | 136 | |
| $ | 7,139 | | | $ | 4,263 | |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | | |
Stock options | $ | 6,932 | | | $ | 7,895 | |
Restricted stock units | 18,146 | | | 16,653 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 2,061 | | | 1,917 | |
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense | 27,139 | | | 26,465 | |
Less: income tax effect | 7,339 | | | 8,017 | |
Net stock-based compensation expense | $ | 19,800 | | | $ | 18,448 | |
Modifications and Settlements
2009 Goodwill Program:
In January 2009, the Company's Board of Directors approved a program (the "Goodwill Program"), wherein non-officer employees holding options that were outstanding as of November 1, 2008 which reached or would have reached their contractual 10-year expiration term between November 2008 and December 2009 would be eligible for a payment in the form of cash or restricted stock units ("RSUs"). Under the Goodwill Program, payments exceeding $5,000 would be settled in RSUs that vest over three quarters, contingent upon continued employment, while amounts below $5,000 would be settled in cash in a lump-sum payment. The program was extended to officers in May 2009 with substantially similar terms, except that payments exceeding $5,000 to officers were settled in RSUs vesting over six quarters.
The Company recorded a liability for the options settling in cash under the Goodwill Program. Options associated with payments being made in the form of RSUs under the Goodwill Program contained market and service conditions. The Company recognized $0.2 million and $3.3 million in stock-based compensation expenses related to this program during the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively.
Fair Value
The fair value of options granted to employees under the Company's 1996 Plan and rights to acquire common stock under the Company's 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP") is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The fair value of RSUs is estimated using the value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, reduced by the present value of dividends expected to be paid on the Company's common stock prior to vesting.
Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatilities from the Company's traded common stock over a period equal to the expected term. The Company analyzed historical exercise patterns of relatively homogeneous groups of employees to estimate the expected holding period for options granted through December 29, 2008. Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company began utilizing a simplified method, to estimate expected holding periods. This change was attributable to the significant impact resulting from the completion of the tender offer and the Company reducing the contractual term associated with new option grants from ten years to seven years. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield. The Company determines the dividend yield by dividing the annualized dividends per share by the prior quarter's average stock price. The result is analyzed by the Company to decide whether it represents expected future dividend yield. The Company also estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and makes revisions if the estimates change significantly or the actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
The fair value of share-based awards granted to employees has been estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model and the following weighted-average assumptions:
| | | | | |
| Stock Option Plan |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
Expected holding period (in years) | 5.2 | | | 4.6 | |
Risk-free interest rate | 1.7 | % | | 2.6 | % |
Expected stock price volatility | 37.0 | % | | 38.3 | % |
Dividend yield | 4.2 | % | | 5.4 | % |
| | | | | |
| ESP Plan |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
Expected holding period (in years) | — | | | — | |
Risk-free interest rate | — | % | | — | % |
Expected stock price volatility | — | % | | — | % |
Dividend yield | — | % | | — | % |
The weighted-average fair value of stock options granted was $3.76 and $3.52 per share for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of RSUs granted was $14.25 and $15.86 per share for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively.
Stock Option Plans
Stock Options
The following table summarizes outstanding, exercisable and vested and expected to vest stock options as of September 25, 2010 and their activity for the three months ended September 25, 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1) |
Balance at June 26, 2010 | 29,162,507 | | | $ | 27.05 | | | | | |
Options Granted | 3,076,580 | | | 16.58 | | | | | |
Options Exercised | (75,132 | ) | | 12.83 | | | | | |
Options Cancelled | (418,963 | ) | | 30.71 | | | | | |
Balance at September 25, 2010 | 31,744,992 | | | $ | 25.93 | | | 4.2 | | | $ | 41,108,099 | |
Exercisable, September 25, 2010 | 17,440,443 | | | $ | 33.43 | | | 2.9 | | | $ | 5,118,811 | |
Vested and expected to vest, September 25, 2010 | 29,535,079 | | | $ | 33.43 | | | 4.1 | | | $ | 36,800,591 | |
| |
(1) | Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the closing price per share of the Company's common stock on September 24, 2010, the last business day proceeding the fiscal quarter-end multiplied by the number of options outstanding, exercisable or vested and expected to vest as of September 25, 2010. |
As of September 25, 2010, there was $44.9 million of total unrecognized stock compensation cost related to 14.3 million unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.9 years.
Restricted Stock Units
The following table summarizes outstanding and expected to vest RSUs as of September 25, 2010 and their activity during the three months ended September 25, 2010:
| | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in Years) | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value(1) |
Balance at June 26, 2010 | 10,575,417 | | | | | |
Restricted stock units granted | 3,043,214 | | | | | |
Restricted stock units released | (1,084,389 | ) | | | | |
Restricted stock units cancelled | (149,252 | ) | | | | |
Balance at September 25, 2010 | 12,384,990 | | | 2.7 | | | $ | 221,879,959 | |
Vested and expected to vest, September 25, 2010 | 10,014,844 | | | 2.6 | | | $ | 179,866,594 | |
| |
(1) | Aggregate intrinsic value for RSUs represents the closing price per share of the Company's common stock on September 24, 2010, the last business day preceding the fiscal quarter-end multiplied by the number of RSUs outstanding or expected to vest as of September 25, 2010. |
The Company withheld shares totaling $5.5 million in value as a result of employee withholding taxes based on the value of the RSUs on their vesting date as determined by the Company's closing stock price for the three months ended September 25, 2010. The total payments for the employees' tax obligations to the taxing authorities are reflected as financing activities within the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
As of September 25, 2010, there was $153.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to 12.4 million unvested RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.8 years.
2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
As of September 25, 2010, there was $1.4 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to the ESPP.
NOTE 7: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. For purposes of computing basic earnings per share, the weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock excludes unvested RSUs. Diluted earnings per share incorporates the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options, assumed release of unvested RSUs and assumed issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plans using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
Numerator for basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share | | | |
Net income | $ | 117,550 | | | $ | 41,952 | |
| | | |
Denominator for basic earnings per share | 298,216 | | | 306,276 | |
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | |
Stock options, ESPP and RSUs | 3,472 | | | 5,886 | |
Denominator for diluted earnings per share | 301,688 | | | 312,162 | |
Earnings per share: | | | |
Basic | $ | 0.39 | | | $ | 0.14 | |
Diluted | $ | 0.39 | | | $ | 0.13 | |
Approximately 22.2 million and 20.1 million of the Company's stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively. These options were excluded because they were determined to be antidilutive. However, such options could be dilutive in the future and, under those circumstances, would be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
NOTE 8: SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates and tracks its results as one reportable segment. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of analog integrated circuits. The Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker.
The Company has fifteen operating segments which aggregate into one reportable segment. Two or more operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating segment for financial reporting purposes if the segments have similar economic characteristics and if the segments are similar in each of the following areas:
•the nature of products and services;
•the nature of the production processes;
•the type or class of customer for their products and services; and
•the methods used to distribute their products or provide their services.
The Company meets each of the aggregation criteria for the following reasons:
•the sale of analog and mixed signal integrated circuits is the primary source of revenue for each of the Company's fifteen operating segments;
•the integrated circuits sold by each of the Company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes;
•the integrated circuits marketed by each of the Company's operating segments are sold to the same types of customers; and
•all of the Company's integrated circuits are sold through a centralized sales force and common wholesale distributors.
All of the Company's operating segments share similar economic characteristics as they have a similar long term business model. The causes for variation among the Company's operating segments are the same and include factors such as (i) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations, (ii) number of competitors, (iii) product differentiation and (iv) size of market opportunity. Additionally, each operating segment is subject to the overall cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry. The number and composition of employees and the amounts and types of tools and materials required are similar for each operating segment. Finally, even though the Company periodically reorganizes its operating segments based upon changes in customers, end-markets or products, acquisitions, long-term growth strategies and the experience and bandwidth of the senior executives in charge, the common financial goals for each operating segment remain constant.
Enterprise-wide information is provided in accordance with GAAP. Geographical revenue information is based on customers' ship-to location. Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment. Property, plant and equipment information is based on the physical location of the assets at the end of each reporting period.
Net revenues from unaffiliated customers by geographic region were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| | (in thousands) |
United States | | $ | 96,188 | | | $ | 68,967 | |
China | | 232,301 | | | 141,421 | |
Japan | | 37,122 | | | 34,410 | |
Korea | | 85,900 | | | 82,515 | |
Rest of Asia | | 64,069 | | | 51,729 | |
Europe | | 89,903 | | | 60,888 | |
Rest of World | | 20,656 | | | 9,316 | |
| | $ | 626,139 | | | $ | 449,246 | |
Net long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| September 25, 2010 | | June 26, 2010 |
| (in thousands) |
United States | $ | 967,032 | | | $ | 983,761 | |
Philippines | 212,389 | | | 216,738 | |
Thailand | 135,266 | | | 116,050 | |
Rest of World | 8,505 | | | 7,887 | |
| $ | 1,323,192 | | | $ | 1,324,436 | |
NOTE 9: COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income consists of net income and net unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale investments and forward exchange contracts, deferred income taxes on unrealized exchange (losses) gains on intercompany receivables, and actuarial loss on post-retirement benefits. The components of comprehensive (loss) income and related tax effects were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Net income, as reported | $ | 117,550 | | | $ | 41,952 | |
Change in unrealized losses on investments, net of tax benefits (expenses) of $0, $213, respectively | (243 | ) | | (371 | ) |
Change in unrealized gains on investments, forward exchange contracts, net of tax benefits (expenses) of $(142), $0, respectively | 248 | | | — | |
Deferred tax on unrealized exchange gains on intercompany receivables | (1,822 | ) | | (428 | ) |
Actuarial gains on post-retirement benefits, net of tax (expense) benefit of $(33), $(29), respectively | 58 | | | 52 | |
Total comprehensive income | $ | 115,791 | | | $ | 41,205 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010 consist of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments of $0.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, net foreign currency translation loss adjustments of $(1.5) million and $(1.5) million, respectively, actuarial losses on post-retirement benefits of $(4.6) million and $(4.7) million, respectively, net unrealized gain (losses) of forward exchange contracts of $0.1 million and $(0.2) million, respectively, and deferred income tax of $(7.7) million and $(5.7) million, respectively, on unrealized exchange gains (losses) related to an intercompany receivable that is of a long-term investment nature.
NOTE 10: INCOME TAXES
In the three months ended September 25, 2010, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $57.9 million, compared to an income tax provision of $50.0 million for the three months ended September 26, 2009.
The Company's federal statutory tax rate is 35%. The Company's income tax provision for the three months ended September 25, 2010 was lower than the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate primarily because of earnings of foreign subsidiaries taxed at lower rates.
The Company's income tax provision for the three months ended September 26, 2009 was higher than the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate primarily because of losses of a foreign subsidiary for which no tax benefit is available. These foreign losses represent costs of ongoing research and developmental efforts as well as licensing rights to preexisting intangibles.
Management estimates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest and penalties, could decrease within the next 12 months by approximately $80 million. Such changes could occur based on the expiration of various statutes of limitations and the possible settlement of ongoing tax audits.
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, the IRS commenced an examination of the Company's federal corporate income tax returns for the fiscal years 2007 and 2008 that was still ongoing as of September 25, 2010. Management believes that it has adequately provided for any adjustments that may result from the IRS examination.
NOTE 11: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Stock Option Litigation
Beginning on or about May 22, 2006, several derivative actions were filed against certain current and former executive officers and directors of the Company alleging, among other things, wrongful conduct of back-dating stock options as well as security law violations. The Company was named solely as a nominal defendant against whom the plaintiffs sought no recovery.
The parties to the derivative litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery entered into a stipulated settlement agreement on September 16, 2008, and on January 2, 2009, the Delaware Court of Chancery approved the settlement and entered a Final Order and Judgment. All derivative actions pending in the California Superior Court have since been dismissed, with prejudice. Net settlement proceeds of $18.9 million were received by the Company on September 10, 2009. The Company recognized an increase to additional paid in capital of $2.5 million related to excess gains while the remainder of the proceeds of $16.4 million was recorded as a reduction in Other operating expenses (income), net.
On February 6, 2008, a putative class action complaint was filed against the Company, its former chief executive officer, now deceased, and its former chief financial officer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging claims under the federal securities laws based on certain alleged misrepresentations and omissions in the Company's public disclosures concerning its stock option accounting practices. On May 15, 2008, the Court appointed the Cobb County Government Employees Pension Plan, the DeKalb County Pension Plan and the Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System as co-lead plaintiffs (collectively, "Lead Plaintiffs"). On November 14, 2008, Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint, which, among other things, added the Company's former treasurer as a defendant.
On May 3, 2010, Lead Plaintiffs and the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding reflecting an agreement in principle to settle all claims asserted against all defendants in the action, which provided for the payment of $173 million in cash by the Company, and on June 18, 2010, Lead Plaintiffs and the Company entered into, and Lead Plaintiffs filed with the Court, a formal stipulation of settlement memorializing the agreement to settle all claims against all defendants in the action. On July 23, 2010, the Company paid the $173 million settlement amount into an escrow fund in accordance with the terms of the settlement. On September 29, 2010, the Court issued its Final Order and Judgment finally approving the settlement.
Other Legal Proceedings
In addition to the above proceedings, the Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of the Company's business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of such matters arising in the normal course of business will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Indemnifications
The Company indemnifies certain customers, distributors, suppliers and subcontractors for attorney fees, damages and costs awarded against such parties in certain circumstances in which the Company's products are alleged to infringe third party intellectual property rights, including patents, registered trademarks or copyrights. The terms of the Company's indemnification obligations are generally perpetual from the effective date of the agreement. In certain cases, there are limits on and exceptions to the Company's potential liability for indemnification relating to intellectual property infringement claims.
Legal Fees Associated with Indemnification Obligations, Defense and Other Related Costs
Pursuant to the Company's charter documents and indemnification agreements, the Company has certain indemnification obligations to its officers, directors and certain former officers and directors. More specifically, the Company has separate written indemnification agreements with its current and former executive officers and directors as well as with its director of internal audit. Pursuant to such obligations, the Company has incurred expenses related to legal fees and expenses advanced to certain former officers of the Company who are subject to pending civil suits and civil charges by the SEC and other governmental agencies in connection with Maxim's historical stock option granting practices. The Company expenses such amounts as incurred.
NOTE 12: COMMON STOCK REPURCHASES
In October 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $750 million of the Company's common stock from time to time at the discretion of the Company's management. This stock repurchase authorization has no expiration date. All prior authorizations by the Company's Board of Directors for the repurchase of common stock were canceled and superseded by this authorization.
During the three months ended September 25, 2010, the Company repurchased approximately 4.9 million shares of its common stock for $84.5 million. At the end of the fiscal quarter ended September 25, 2010, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to an additional $240.3 million of the Company's common stock. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of such repurchases will be based on several factors, including the price of the Company's common stock and general market and business conditions.
NOTE 13: IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
End of Line Sorting and Testing Facilities
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company identified certain assets as excess or obsolete primarily due to changes in certain manufacturing technology. In connection with these circumstances, the Company recorded a charge for the write-down of equipment to its estimated fair value. The total charge of $5.0 million was included in impairment of long-lived assets in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has ceased depreciation and classified these assets as held for sale based on its intentions to sell the assets.
Fabrication Facility, Oregon
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, as a result of reduced future wafer output requirements associated with equipment utilizing certain process technologies, the Company recorded a write-down of equipment to be sold to the equipment's estimated fair value. This charge of $3.3 million was included in impairment of long-lived assets in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has ceased depreciation and classified these assets as held for sale based on its intentions to sell the assets.
NOTE 14: RESTRUCTURING ACTIVITIES
Business Unit Reorganization
During the three months ended September 25, 2010, the Company recorded and paid approximately $1.2 million in severance costs associated with the reorganization of one if its business units and to employees from the Teridian acquisition who remained employed for a temporary period following the completion of the acquisition for transitional purposes.
Shutdown of Dallas fab
During the three months ended September 26, 2009, the Company recorded approximately $1.6 million in restructuring costs associated with the closure of the Dallas, Texas wafer manufacturing facility. These costs consisted of decommissioning of equipment at the facility and estimated severance and benefits associated with employees of the facility.
Activity and liability balances related to the restructuring activity for the three months ended September 25, 2010 were as follows:
| | | |
| Severance and Benefits |
| (in thousands) |
Balance at June 26, 2010 | $ | 748 | |
| |
Restructuring accrual | 1,240 | |
Cash payments | (1,216 | ) |
Changes in estimates | (75 | ) |
| |
Balance at September 25, 2010 | $ | 697 | |
The Company has included $0.7 million within the line item Accrued salary and related expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 15: ACQUISITIONS
PHYWORKS
On September 7, 2010, the Company acquired Phyworks Limited. (“Phyworks”), a developer of high-speed communications integrated circuits. The total cash consideration associated with the acquisition was $76.0 million. The acquired assets included cash of $4.6 million, accounts receivable of $1.2 million, inventories of $2.9 million, $0.1 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets, $0.4 million in fixed assets. The Company preliminarily allocated $1.9 million to customer order backlog, $47.1 million to Intellectual Property, $5.8 million to in process research and development, $1.6 million to customer relationships, $0.3 million to tradename, and $26.1 million to goodwill. The Company also assumed $3.8 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $12.2 million in deferred tax liabilities. The Company expects that none of the goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements for the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 include the operations of Phyworks commencing as of the acquisition date. No supplemental pro forma information is presented for the acquisition due to the immaterial effect of the acquisition on the Company's results of operations.
TERIDIAN
On May 11, 2010, the Company completed its purchase of Teridian Semiconductor, Inc. (“Teridian”), a fabless mixed-signal semiconductor company focused on electricity metering and energy measurement for the smart grid. The total cash consideration associated with the acquisition was $314.9 million. The acquired assets included cash of $2.1 million, accounts receivable of $7.3 million, inventories of $14.0 million, $2.7 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets, $2.1 million in fixed assets, $4.3 million in customer order backlog, $85.6 million in Intellectual Property, $3.1 million of in process research and development, $44.7 million in customer relationships, $1.0 million in tradename, $13.8 million in deferred tax assets and $196.6 million in goodwill. The Company also assumed $14.1 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $48.3 million in deferred tax liabilities. The Company expects that none of the goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes. During the three months ended September 25, 2010 the Company adjusted the carrying values of certain acquired assets and liabilities primarily related to reserves and allowances resulting in a reduction in goodwill of approximately $2.9 million.
L&L ENGINEERING
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company acquired L&L Engineering, a company developing digital power converter technology for approximately $4.0 million in cash. The Company may pay up to an additional $5.5 million based on the achievement of certain product development and product release milestones and continued employment of certain key employees assumed from L&L Engineering. The Company preliminarily allocated $1.1 million to in-process research and development and $2.9 million to goodwill. The Company will amortize the in-process research and development over the estimated life of the technology upon completion of its development. The Company expects that all of the goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes.
NOTE 16: GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The Company monitors the recoverability of goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions, by reporting unit, annually, or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company performed the annual impairment analysis during the first quarter 2011 and concluded that goodwill was not impaired, as the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, including goodwill.
Activity and goodwill balances for the three months ended September 25, 2010 were as follows:
| | | |
| Goodwill |
Balance at June 26, 2010 | $ | 226,223 | |
Acquisition | 26,086 | |
Adjustments | (2,862 | ) |
Balance at September 25, 2010 | $ | 249,447 | |
During the three months ended September 25, 2010 the Company adjusted the carrying values of certain acquired assets and liabilities primarily related to reserves and allowances with the Teridian acquisition, resulting in a reduction in goodwill of approximately $2.9 million.
Intangible Assets
The useful lives of amortizable intangible assets are as follows:
| | |
Asset | | Life |
Intellectual Property | | 5-10 years |
Customer Relationships | | 5-10 years |
Tradename | | 3 years |
Backlog | | 1 year |
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 25, 2010 |
| Original Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| (in thousands) |
Intellectual property * | $ | 204,112 | | | $ | 40,004 | | | $ | 164,108 | |
Customer relationships | 88,630 | | | 14,998 | | | 73,632 | |
Tradename | 1,700 | | | 406 | | | 1,294 | |
Backlog | 6,400 | | | 4,619 | | | 1,781 | |
Total intangible assets | $ | 300,842 | | | $ | 60,027 | | | $ | 240,815 | |
* Original cost includes $11.8 million of In-process research and development acquired from L&L Engineering, Phyworks, Teridian and Trinity.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 26, 2010 |
| Original Cost | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net |
| (in thousands) |
Intellectual property * | $ | 149,462 | | | $ | 33,305 | | | $ | 116,157 | |
Customer relationships | 87,030 | | | 11,745 | | | 75,285 | |
Tradename | 1,400 | | | 264 | | | 1,136 | |
Backlog | 4,500 | | | 2,350 | | | 2,150 | |
Total intangible assets | $ | 242,392 | | | $ | 47,664 | | | $ | 194,728 | |
* The total above excludes $4.2 million of in-process research and development which will be amortized upon completion of development over the estimated useful life of the technology.
The following table presents the amortization expense of intangible assets and its presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Cost of goods sold | | | |
Intellectual property | $ | 6,349 | | | $ | 2,346 | |
Total | 6,349 | | | 2,346 | |
| | | |
Intangible Asset Amortization | | | |
Intellectual property | 350 | | | 350 | |
Customer relationships | 3,253 | | | 1,410 | |
Tradename | 141 | | | 34 | |
Backlog | 2,269 | | | 50 | |
Total | 6,013 | | | 1,844 | |
| | | |
Total Intangible Asset Amortization Expenses | $ | 12,362 | | | $ | 4,190 | |
The following table represents the estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets as of September 25, 2010:
| | | | |
Fiscal Year | | Amount |
| | (in thousands) |
Remaining nine months of 2011 | | $ | 35,705 | |
2012 | | 46,041 | |
2013 | | 41,210 | |
2014 | | 35,162 | |
2015 | | 32,902 | |
Thereafter | | 38,046 | |
Total * | | $ | 229,066 | |
* The total above excludes $11.8 million of in-process research and development which will be amortized upon completion of development over the estimated useful life of the technology.
NOTE 17: LONG-TERM DEBT
On June 17, 2010, the Company completed a public offering of $300 million aggregate principal amount of the Company's 3.45% senior unsecured and unsubordinated notes (the Notes) due 2013, with an effective interest rate of 3.49%. Interest on the notes will be payable semi-annually in arrears on June 14 and December 14 of each year, commencing December 14, 2010. The Notes are governed by a base and supplemental indenture dated June 10, 2010 and June 17, 2010, respectively, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. The net proceeds of the offering were approximately $298 million, after issuing at a discount and deducting expenses, and are included in the financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company accounts for the Notes based on their amortized cost. The discount and expenses will be amortized to interest income and other, net over the life of the Notes. Interest expenses associated with the Notes was $2.8 million and $0 during the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively and is recorded in Interest and other (expenses) income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company may redeem all or a portion of the Notes at anytime, at a redemption price equal to the greater of: 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest; or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest discounted on a semiannual basis, at the Treasury Rate plus 35 basis points, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The underwriting agreements governing the Notes contain covenants that provide limitations over the Company's creation or incurrence of liens or sale and lease-back transactions on any of its properties, or properties of its subsidiaries. Upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event, each holder shall have the right to require the Company to buy their Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company's ability to repurchase the senior notes in such event may be limited by law, by the indenture associated with the senior notes by the Company's then-available financial resources or by the terms of other agreements to which the Company may be party at such time. If the Company fails to repurchase the senior notes as required by the indenture, it would constitute an event of default. In the event of default, the principal amount and interest will become due and payable immediately.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company disclaims any duty to and undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information relating to existing conditions, future events or otherwise or to release publicly the results of any future revisions it may make to forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by federal securities laws. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Readers should carefully review future reports and documents that the Company files with or furnishes to the SEC from time to time, such as its Annual Reports on Form 10-K (particularly Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations), its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q (particularly Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) and any Current Reports on Form 8-K.
Overview of Business
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. ("Maxim" or the "Company" and also referred to as "we," "our" or "us") is incorporated in the state of Delaware. Maxim designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of linear and mixed-signal integrated circuits, commonly referred to as analog circuits, for a large number of geographically diverse customers. The Company also provides a range of high-frequency process technologies and capabilities that can be used in custom designs. The analog market is fragmented and characterized by many diverse applications, a great number of product variations and, with respect to many circuit types, relatively long product life cycles. The Company is a global company with wafer manufacturing facilities in the United States, testing facilities in the Philippines and Thailand and sales and circuit design offices throughout the world. The major end-markets in which the Company's products are sold are the communications, computing, consumer and industrial markets.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. The SEC has defined the most critical accounting policies as the ones that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and that require us to make our most difficult and subjective accounting judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, our most critical accounting policies include revenue recognition and related allowances, which impact the recording of revenues; valuation of inventories, which impacts costs of goods sold and gross margins; the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets, which impacts write-offs of fixed assets, intangible assets, and goodwill; accounting for stock-based compensation, which impacts cost of goods sold, gross margins and operating expenses; and accounting for income taxes, which impacts the income tax provision; and assessment of contingencies, which impacts charges recorded in cost of goods sold and operating expenses. We have other significant accounting policies that either do not generally require estimates and judgments that are as difficult or subjective, or are less likely to have a material impact on our reported results of operations for a given period.
There have been no significant changes to the Company's critical accounting policies during the three months ended September 25, 2010, as compared to the previous disclosures in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2010.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income data expressed as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated:
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| |
Net revenues | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of goods sold | 38.3 | % | | 44.0 | % |
Gross margin | 61.7 | % | | 56.0 | % |
Operating expenses: | | | |
Research and development | 20.4 | % | | 25.9 | % |
Selling, general and administrative | 11.5 | % | | 11.9 | % |
Intangible asset amortization | 1.0 | % | | 0.4 | % |
Impairment of long-lived assets | — | % | | 1.8 | % |
Severance and restructuring expenses (recoveries) | 0.2 | % | | (0.3 | )% |
Other operating expenses (income), net | — | % | | (3.8 | )% |
Total operating expenses | 33.1 | % | | 35.9 | % |
Operating income | 28.6 | % | | 20.1 | % |
Interest and other (expense) income, net | (0.6 | )% | | 0.4 | % |
Income before provision for income taxes | 28.0 | % | | 20.5 | % |
Provision for income taxes | 9.2 | % | | 11.1 | % |
Net income | 18.8 | % | | 9.4 | % |
The following table shows stock-based compensation included in the components of the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income reported above as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated:
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| |
Cost of goods sold | 0.6 | % | | 1.2 | % |
Research and development | 2.6 | % | | 3.7 | % |
Selling, general and administrative | 1.1 | % | | 0.9 | % |
| 4.3 | % | | 5.9 | % |
Net Revenues
Net revenues were $626.1 million and $449.2 million for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively, an increase of 39.4%. We classify our net revenue by four major end market categories: Communications, Computing, Consumer and Industrial. Net shipments from all four markets increased during the three months ended September 25, 2010 as compared to September 26, 2009 due to improved demand for our products primarily in the Consumer and Industrial markets.
During the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, approximately 85% and 85% of net revenues, respectively, were derived from customers outside of the United States. While the majority of these sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate our risks on firm commitments and net monetary assets denominated in foreign currencies. The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on our revenue and results of operations for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009 was immaterial.
Gross Margin
Our gross margin percentage was 61.7% and 56.0% for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively. The gross margin percentage for the three months ended September 25, 2010, as compared to the three months ended September 26, 2009, increased primarily due to improved factory utilization and decreased inventory write-downs of $3.7 million. These improvements were offset by a $4.0 million increase in intangible asset amortization and $4.4 million of expense related to the write-up of acquired inventory due to acquisitions.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses were $127.8 million and $116.3 million for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively, which represented 20.4% and 25.9% of net revenues, respectively. The $11.5 million increase in research and development expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries, bonuses, and benefits of $9.1 million, most of which is related to higher bonus levels in connection with increased profitability for first quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $72.1 million and $53.5 million for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively, which represented 11.5% and 11.9% of net revenues, respectively. The $18.6 million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries, bonuses, and benefits of $11.8 million.
Stock-based Compensation
The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense by type of award, and resulting tax effect, included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009;
| | | | | | | |
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Cost of goods sold | | | |
Stock options | $ | 754 | | | $ | 2,015 | |
Restricted stock units | 2,774 | | | 3,078 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 367 | | | 368 | |
| $ | 3,895 | | | $ | 5,461 | |
Research and development expense | | | |
Stock options | $ | 4,549 | | | 4,131 | |
Restricted stock units | 10,214 | | | 11,197 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 1,342 | | | 1,413 | |
| $ | 16,105 | | | $ | 16,741 | |
Selling, general and administrative expense | | | |
Stock options | $ | 1,629 | | | $ | 1,749 | |
Restricted stock units | 5,158 | | | 2,378 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 352 | | | 136 | |
| $ | 7,139 | | | $ | 4,263 | |
Total stock-based compensation expense | | | |
Stock options | $ | 6,932 | | | $ | 7,895 | |
Restricted stock units | 18,146 | | | 16,653 | |
Employee stock purchase plan | 2,061 | | | 1,917 | |
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense | 27,139 | | | 26,465 | |
Less: income tax effect | 7,339 | | | 8,017 | |
Net stock-based compensation expense | $ | 19,800 | | | $ | 18,448 | |
Pre-tax stock-based compensation increased to $27.1 million during the three months ended September 25, 2010 from 26.5 million during the three months ended September 26, 2009, which represented 4.3% and 5.9% of net revenues, respectively.
Intangible Asset Amortization Expenses
Intangible asset amortization expenses were $6.0 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively. The $4.2 million increase in intangible asset amortization expenses is primarily attributable to the acquisition of Phyworks in the first quarter of fiscal year 2011 and the acquisition of Teridian in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
End of Line Sorting and Testing Facilities
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company identified certain assets as excess or obsolete primarily due to changes in certain manufacturing technology. In connection with these circumstances, the Company recorded a charge for the write-down of equipment to its estimated fair value. The total charge of $5.0 million was included in impairment of long-lived assets in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has ceased depreciation and classified these assets as held for sale based on its intentions to sell the assets and has included $0.6 million in Other Assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 25, 2010.
Fabrication Facility, Oregon
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, as a result of reduced future wafer output requirements associated with equipment utilizing certain process technologies, the Company recorded a write-down of equipment to be sold to the equipment's estimated fair value. This charge of $3.3 million was included in impairment of long-lived assets in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company has ceased depreciation and classified these assets as held for sale based on its intentions to sell the assets and has included $0.5 million in Other Assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 25, 2010.
Severance and Restructuring Expenses
Business Unit Reorganization
During the three months ended September 25, 2010, the Company recorded and paid approximately $1.2 million in severance costs associated with the reorganization of one if its business units and to employees from the Teridian acquisition who remained employed for a temporary period following the completion of the acquisition for transitional purposes.
Shutdown of Dallas fab
During the three months ended September 26, 2009, the Company recorded approximately $1.6 million in restructuring costs associated with the closure of the Dallas, Texas wafer manufacturing facility. These costs consisted of decommissioning of equipment at the facility and estimated severance and benefits associated with employees of the facility.
Other Operating Expenses (Income), Net
Other operating expenses, net primarily consists of expense items related to the restatement of previously reported financial statements and associated litigation.
The following table summarizes activities for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009:
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Legal and accounting expenses | $ | 935 | | | $ | 5,742 | |
Payroll tax and related adjustments | (902 | ) | | (6,229 | ) |
Derivative litigation settlement | — | | | (16,419 | ) |
Other | — | | | 21 | |
Total | $ | 33 | | | $ | (16,885 | ) |
The Company incurred $0.9 million and $5.7 million in legal and accounting expenses associated with the restatement of certain of its previously filed financial statements during the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, respectively. The decrease of $4.8 million in restatement related legal and accounting fees is primarily due to decreased indemnification related legal fees associated with the legal settlement of the derivative litigation during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
As a result of the Company's investigation into its equity awards, the Company recorded certain U.S. and foreign payroll tax, interest and penalty accruals in prior years. During the three months ended September 25, 2010 and September 26, 2009, the Company reversed $0.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of these accruals due to the expiration of the tax statute of limitations in various foreign jurisdictions.
During the three months ended September 26, 2009 the company also recognized $16.4 million in income attributable to gains directly related to proceeds received associated with the settlement of the derivative litigation during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. See Note 11 "Commitments and Contingencies".
Interest and Other (Expense) Income, Net
Interest and other (expense) income, net, was $(3.7) million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and
September 26, 2009, respectively. This increase in expense, or decrease in income, was primarily driven by increased interest expenses of $2.8 million related to long-term debt obligations, increased foreign exchange losses of $1.0 million, and decreased interest income of $1.1 million due to lower average interest rates and lower invested cash and cash equivalents.
Provision for Income Taxes
In the three months ended September 25, 2010, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $57.9 million compared to an income tax provision of $50.0 million for the three months ended September 26, 2009.
The Company's federal statutory tax rate is 35%. The Company's income tax provision for the three months ended September 25, 2010 was lower than the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate primarily because of earnings of foreign subsidiaries taxed at lower rates.
The Company's income tax provision for the three months ended September 26, 2009 was higher than the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate primarily because of losses of a foreign subsidiary for which no tax benefit is available. These foreign losses represent costs of ongoing research and developmental efforts as well as licensing rights to preexisting intangibles.
We expect that our effective tax rate for the remainder of the fiscal year 2011 will be lower than 35% as the Company's new global structure becomes fully operational. However, the effective tax rate could be adversely impacted should the expected tax benefits from the new global structure occur later than expected or be lower than expected, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.
Management estimates that it's reasonably possible that the liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest and penalties, could decrease within the next 12 months by approximately $80 million. Such changes could occur based on the expiration of various statutes of limitations and the possible settlement of ongoing tax audits.
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, the IRS commenced an examination of the Company's federal corporate income tax returns for the fiscal years 2007 and 2008 that was still ongoing as of September 25, 2010. Management believes that it has adequately provided for any adjustments that may result from the IRS examination.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-17, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) - Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” This ASU provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. This ASU will be effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved beginning in our second quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a significant effect on its consolidated financial statements.
BACKLOG
At September 25, 2010, backlog shippable within the next quarter was approximately $594.5 million. The Company's backlog shippable within the next quarter at the end of the quarter ended June 26, 2010 was approximately $613.5 million. Our backlog is subject to revisions, cancellations and rescheduling which could have a material impact on the timing and extent of our revenues and is not indicative of revenue projections for subsequent quarters.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash flows were as follows:
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| September 25, 2010 | | September 26, 2009 |
| (in thousands) |
Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 158,499 | | | $ | 138,515 | |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (111,101 | ) | | 71,063 | |
Net cash used in financing activities | (155,630 | ) | | (82,897 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | $ | (108,232 | ) | | $ | 126,681 | |
Operating activities
Cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in certain assets and liabilities.
Cash from operations for the three months ended September 25, 2010 increased by approximately $20.0 million compared with three months ended September 26, 2009. This is due to increases in net income of $75.6 million, increases in non-cash adjustments of $83.6 million, primarily related to a decrease in deferred tax assets, which were offset by a decrease in other working capital changes of $139.2 million, which was negatively impacted by the payment of $173.0 million related to the litigation settlement. (See Note 11: Commitments and Contingencies)
Investing activities
Investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures, net investment purchases, maturities and acquisitions.
Cash provided by investing activities decreased $182.2 million for the three months ended September 25, 2010 compared with the three months ended September 26, 2009. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities is primarily due to maturity of short-term investments of $100.2 million during the three months ended September 26, 2009, as the Company shifted its investment portfolio to money market funds, and cash used for acquisitions, which increased to $73.1 million during the three months ended September 25, 2010 as compared with $4.0 million during the three months ended September 26, 2009. Additionally, cash used in investing activities for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and the three months ended September 26, 2009 included capital expenditures of $38.5 million and $26.5 million, respectively.
Financing activities
Financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock, payment of dividends to stockholders and withholding tax payments associated with net share settlements of equity awards.
Net cash used in financing activities increased by approximately $72.7 million for the three months ended September 25, 2010 compared with the three months ended September 26, 2009. This increase was primarily due to an increase in repurchases of common stock of $66.9 million.
The Company anticipates that the available funds and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet the requirements of its business for the next twelve months, including its working capital requirements and its anticipated level of capital expenditures.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
As of September 25, 2010, the Company did not have any material off-balance-sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303 (a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company's market risk has not changed materially from the interest rate and foreign currency risks disclosed in Item 7A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2010.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer ("CEO") and our chief financial officer ("CFO"), evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of September 25, 2010. Our management, including the CEO and the CFO, has concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 25, 2010. The purpose of these controls and procedures is to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and our CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended September 25, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls
A system of internal control over financial reporting is intended to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and no control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance. The design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect financial statement errors and misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth above under Note 11 in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
A description of risks associated with our business, financial condition and results of our operations is set forth in Item 1A - Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2010, which is herein incorporated by reference.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table summarizes the activity related to stock repurchases for the three months ended September 25, 2010:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) |
| Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | Maximum Amount That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
Jun. 27, 2010 - Jul. 24, 2010 | 2,100 | | | $ | 17.52 | | | 2,100 | | | $ | 288,016 | |
Jul. 25, 2010 - Aug. 21, 2010 | 2,040 | | | 17.57 | | | 2,040 | | | 252,177 | |
Aug. 22, 2010 - Sep. 25, 2010 | 715 | | | 16.59 | | | 715 | | | 240,323 | |
Total for the quarter | 4,855 | | | $ | 17.40 | | | 4,855 | | | $ | 240,323 | |
In October 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to $750 million of the Company's common stock from time to time at the discretion of the Company's management. This stock repurchase authorization has no expiration date. All prior authorizations by the Company's Board of Directors for the repurchase of common stock were canceled and superseded by this authorization.
In the fiscal quarter ended September 25, 2010, the Company repurchased approximately 4.9 million shares of its common stock for approximately $84.5 million. As of the end of the fiscal quarter ended September 25, 2010, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to an additional $240.3 million of the Company's common stock. The number of shares to be repurchased and the timing of such repurchases will be based on several factors, including the price of the Company's common stock and general market and business conditions.
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4: RESERVED
Not applicable.
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
| |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended September 25, 2010, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 25, 2010 and June 26, 2010, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended September 25, 2010 and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
| |
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
November 1, 2010 | | MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. |
| | |
| | By:/s/ David A. Caron |
| | |
| | David A. Caron |
| | Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer |