e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10 - Q
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number 000-52584
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
20-1132959 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
33583 Woodward Avenue, Birmingham, MI 48009
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(248) 723-7200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (ii) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filed, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers Common Stock as of November 13, 2009, was
1,800,000 shares.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
6,920,168 |
|
|
$ |
1,201,318 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
2,410,489 |
|
|
|
3,462,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
9,330,657 |
|
|
|
4,663,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities, available for sale (Note 3) |
|
|
4,406,090 |
|
|
|
3,880,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (Note 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
67,485,024 |
|
|
|
56,840,675 |
|
Less: allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(872,426 |
) |
|
|
(710,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
66,612,598 |
|
|
|
56,130,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises & equipment (Note 6) |
|
|
2,023,389 |
|
|
|
2,232,317 |
|
Interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
440,005 |
|
|
|
391,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
82,812,739 |
|
|
$ |
67,298,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (Note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
$ |
7,897,199 |
|
|
$ |
5,194,795 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
64,694,097 |
|
|
|
52,553,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
72,591,296 |
|
|
|
57,748,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
204,686 |
|
|
|
238,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
72,795,982 |
|
|
|
57,986,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior cumulative perpetual preferred stock series A
$1,000 liquidation value per share, 5%
Authorized, issued and outstanding 1,635 shares |
|
|
1,635,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant cumulative perpetual preferred stock series B
$1,000 liquidation value per share, 9%
Authorized, issued and outstanding 82 shares |
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Discount on senior preferred stock |
|
|
(84,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premium on warrant preferred stock |
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized 4,500,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding 1,800,000 shares |
|
|
17,034,330 |
|
|
|
17,034,330 |
|
Additional paid in capital share based payments |
|
|
485,764 |
|
|
|
466,553 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(9,254,567 |
) |
|
|
(8,311,252 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
109,236 |
|
|
|
122,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
10,016,757 |
|
|
|
9,311,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
82,812,739 |
|
|
$ |
67,298,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
1,038,306 |
|
|
$ |
817,556 |
|
|
$ |
2,774,781 |
|
|
$ |
2,196,208 |
|
Taxable securities |
|
|
36,437 |
|
|
|
42,176 |
|
|
|
110,948 |
|
|
|
97,811 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
23,711 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
113,841 |
|
Correspondent bank |
|
|
9,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
1,085,288 |
|
|
|
883,443 |
|
|
|
2,905,785 |
|
|
|
2,407,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
337,221 |
|
|
|
351,789 |
|
|
|
1,005,080 |
|
|
|
1,005,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
337,221 |
|
|
|
351,789 |
|
|
|
1,005,080 |
|
|
|
1,005,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
748,067 |
|
|
|
531,654 |
|
|
|
1,900,705 |
|
|
|
1,402,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
109,146 |
|
|
|
180,776 |
|
|
|
253,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
716,067 |
|
|
|
422,508 |
|
|
|
1,719,929 |
|
|
|
1,148,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan fees and charges |
|
|
4,337 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
10,008 |
|
|
|
15,027 |
|
Deposit fees and charges |
|
|
20,053 |
|
|
|
15,492 |
|
|
|
54,779 |
|
|
|
53,307 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
16,224 |
|
|
|
12,733 |
|
|
|
28,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest income |
|
|
27,306 |
|
|
|
34,914 |
|
|
|
77,520 |
|
|
|
96,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
398,630 |
|
|
|
301,753 |
|
|
|
1,176,724 |
|
|
|
1,163,357 |
|
Occupancy & equipment expense |
|
|
191,873 |
|
|
|
198,158 |
|
|
|
607,413 |
|
|
|
616,402 |
|
FAS 123R share based payments |
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
(21,000 |
) |
|
|
19,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
Data processing expense |
|
|
54,845 |
|
|
|
47,973 |
|
|
|
158,610 |
|
|
|
135,068 |
|
Advertising and public relations |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
10,110 |
|
|
|
56,608 |
|
|
|
69,721 |
|
Professional fees |
|
|
72,663 |
|
|
|
54,311 |
|
|
|
269,977 |
|
|
|
197,067 |
|
Printing and office supplies |
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
|
21,422 |
|
|
|
19,510 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
138,130 |
|
|
|
95,310 |
|
|
|
396,323 |
|
|
|
302,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense |
|
|
866,802 |
|
|
|
691,999 |
|
|
|
2,706,288 |
|
|
|
2,503,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before taxes |
|
|
(123,429 |
) |
|
|
(234,577 |
) |
|
|
(908,839 |
) |
|
|
(1,257,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(123,429 |
) |
|
$ |
(234,577 |
) |
|
$ |
(908,839 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,257,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend on senior preferred stock |
|
|
(20,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accretion of discount on pref stock |
|
|
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective dividend on preferred stock |
|
|
(24,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend on warrant preferred stock |
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premium on warrant pref stk |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective dividend on warrant pref stk |
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(149,654 |
) |
|
$ |
(234,577 |
) |
|
$ |
(943,315 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,257,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
4
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,034,330 |
|
|
$ |
466,553 |
|
|
$ |
(8,311,252 |
) |
|
$ |
122,338 |
|
|
$ |
9,311,969 |
|
Issue senior preferred stock |
|
|
1,635,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635,000 |
|
Issue warrant preferred stock |
|
|
82,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,000 |
|
Discount senior pref. stock |
|
|
(84,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,154 |
) |
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,846 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,846 |
) |
Premium warrant pref. stock |
|
|
9,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,148 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852 |
|
Preferred dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,482 |
) |
Share based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,211 |
|
Comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(908,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(908,839 |
) |
Unrealized gain on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,102 |
) |
|
|
(13,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(921,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,641,994 |
|
|
$ |
17,034,330 |
|
|
$ |
485,764 |
|
|
$ |
(9,254,567 |
) |
|
$ |
109,236 |
|
|
$ |
10,016,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
5
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(908,839 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,257,886 |
) |
Share based payments expense |
|
|
19,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
180,776 |
|
|
|
253,811 |
|
Accretion of securities |
|
|
(3,531 |
) |
|
|
(20,821 |
) |
Gain on sales or calls of securities |
|
|
(3,027 |
) |
|
|
(19,270 |
) |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
225,674 |
|
|
|
234,000 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(48,359 |
) |
|
|
92,466 |
|
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
|
(33,846 |
) |
|
|
53,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(571,941 |
) |
|
|
(664,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in loans |
|
|
(10,662,699 |
) |
|
|
(18,875,912 |
) |
Purchase of securities |
|
|
(2,954,862 |
) |
|
|
(2,978,241 |
) |
Proceeds from sales, calls or maturities of
securities |
|
|
2,422,629 |
|
|
|
1,285,802 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment
improvements |
|
|
(16,746 |
) |
|
|
(25,276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(11,211,678 |
) |
|
|
(20,593,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deposits |
|
|
14,843,261 |
|
|
|
18,537,249 |
|
Proceeds from sale of senior preferred stock |
|
|
1,635,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend on senior preferred stock |
|
|
(27,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
16,450,779 |
|
|
|
18,537,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,667,160 |
|
|
|
(2,720,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the
beginning of the period |
|
|
4,663,497 |
|
|
|
5,139,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the
end of the period |
|
$ |
9,330,657 |
|
|
$ |
2,418,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest: |
|
$ |
1,070,918 |
|
|
$ |
882,655 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
6
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Statement Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.
GAAP) with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements are not included herein. The interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc. (the
Corporation) and the notes thereto included in the Corporations annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which
in the opinion of management are necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results
of operations, and cash flows, have been made. Events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet
date through November 13, 2009 (the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission)
have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial
statements. The results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its
wholly-owned subsidiary the Bank of Birmingham (the Bank). All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Recent Accounting Developments
During May of 2009 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB ASC 855, Subsequent
Events (formerly SFAS 165). This statement establishes standards under which an entity shall
recognize and disclose events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the related
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. FASB ASC 855 is in effect for
fiscal years and interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares
adoption of FASB ASC 855 had no impact on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards board issued three additional pronouncements.
Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares is assessing the impact of the adoption of these pronouncements
on its consolidated financial position and results of operations. The pronouncements were:
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification TM (the
Codification or ASC)
FASB ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(formerly SFAS No. 168). On the effective date of FASB ASC 105, the codification will become the
sole source of authoritative U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, (GAAP), recognized by
the Financial Accounting Standards Board. This pronouncement is effective for interim and fiscal
years ending after September 15, 2009. As FASB ASC 105 does not alter current Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares adoption of the same is not expected to
have any material impact on our
7
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
consolidated financial position or results of operations. In order to ease the transition to the
Codification, we are providing the Codification cross-reference alongside the references to the
standards issued and adopted prior to the adoption of the Codification. All future references to
authoritative accounting literature in our consolidated financial statements will be referenced
in accordance with the Codification.
FASB ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing (formerly SFAS No. 166). The objective of FASB ASC 860
is to improve both the relevance and the comparability of the information that a reporting entity
provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a
transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and the transferring
entitys continuing involvement, if any, in the transferred financial assets. This pronouncement
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods that begin after November 15, 2009.
FASB ASC 810, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The objective of FASB ASC 810 is to
improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to
provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. FASB ASC 810
shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period
that begins after November 15, 2009, for the interim periods within that first annual reporting
period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is
prohibited. Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption
of this standard, but does not expect it to have a material effect on the Corporations financial
position or results of operation.
During August 2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (formerly ASU 2009-05).
This update provides additional guidance on how to measure the fair value of liabilities. It
does not require any new fair value disclosure measurements, but does reiterate the definition of
the fair value of a liability is the price that would be paid to transfer it in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It also states that a company
must consider its own nonperformance risk, including credit risk in the fair value measurement of
liabilities. FASB ASC 820 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
issuance. Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares adoption of the update as of October 1, 2009 is not
expected to have any material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
In September 2009, FASB issued FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (formerly ASU 2009-12).
If certain conditions are met, FASB ASC 820 allows reporting entities to use net asset value per
share to estimate the fair value of these investments as a practical expedient in cases where
there is no readily determinable fair value. The FASB ASC also requires disclosures by major
category of investment about the attributes of the investments, such as the nature of any
restrictions on the investors ability to redeem its investments at the measurement date, any
unfunded commitments, and the investment strategies of the investees. FASB ASC 820 is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after Dec. 15, 2009, with early application permitted.
Adoption of FASB ASC 820 is not expected to have any material impact on Birmingham Bloomfield
Bancshares, Inc.
Note 2 Fair Value Accounting
On January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (formerly
SFAS 157, SFAS 157-2 and SFAS 157-4). FASB ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 was issued to bring
conformity to the definition of fair value; prior to FASB ASC 820 there was no conformity in the
accounting guidance regarding the definition of fair value. FASB ASC 820, Determining Fair Value
When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(formerly SFAS 157-4), provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets and
liabilities in an environment where the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
have significantly decreased and re-
8
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
emphasizes that the objective of a fair value measurement remains an exit price. The FASB ASC is
effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted. The adoption
of FASB ASC 820 did not have a material effect on Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares financial
position or results of operations.
As of June 30, 2009 Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares adopted FASB ASC 825, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (formerly FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1), requires
companies to disclose the fair value of financial instruments within interim financial
statements, adding to the current requirement to provide those disclosures annually. Since FASB
ASC 825 addresses financial statement disclosures only, its adoption, effective June 30, 2009,
did not impact Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares consolidated financial position or results of
operations and the required disclosures have been provided within this note.
Valuation Hierarchy
FASB ASC 820 (formerly SFAS 157) establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of
fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the
valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date and are the primary method of
valuation used by Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc. The three levels are defined as follows.
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets which the Corporation can participate. |
|
|
|
|
Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares currently holds no securities in level one of the
hierarchy. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets
and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 assets and liabilities for Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc. include available
for sale investments in government sponsored agencies, asset backed securities, and
investments in obligations of state and political subdivisions. Fair values of these items
are determined via external pricing from vendors. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the
fair value measurement, and include inputs that are available in situations where there is
little, if any, market activity for the related asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets and liabilities for Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc. include FHLB stock. |
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30,
2009, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and by FASB ASC 820 valuation hierarchy (as described
above):
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 (000s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
September |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
30, 2009 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,244 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 3 Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities, with gross unrealized gains and
losses, follows (000s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
September 30, 2009 (unaudited) |
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
U.S. Government agency securities |
|
$ |
2,844 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,857 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB Stock |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
4,297 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
U.S. Government agency securities |
|
$ |
2,004 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,034 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed securities |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
504 |
|
FHLB Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,758 |
|
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, all securities are available for sale. The
securities held in our portfolio experienced no rating changes during the quarter and remain at
AAA for all except the municipal holding which is at Aa3 based on ratings by Moody. At
September 30, 2009, there were $1.5 million in securities pledged to secure public deposits from
the State of Michigan. At December 31, 2008, there were no securities pledged to secure
borrowings, public deposits or for other purposes required or permitted by law.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at September 30, 2009, by contractual
maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties.
The contractual maturities of securities are as follows (000s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Due in one year through five years |
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
Due in five years through ten years |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed securities,
due after 10 years |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,297 |
|
|
$ |
4,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 4 Loans
A summary of the balances of loans are as follows (000s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1 to 4 family |
|
$ |
1,709 |
|
|
$ |
2,745 |
|
Multifamily |
|
|
11,213 |
|
|
|
7,676 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
29,302 |
|
|
|
23,085 |
|
Construction |
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Second mortgage |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
Equity lines of credit |
|
|
11,347 |
|
|
|
10,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate |
|
|
54,962 |
|
|
|
47,623 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
12,069 |
|
|
|
8,242 |
|
Consumer installment loans |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
67,532 |
|
|
|
56,872 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
Net deferred loan fees |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
$ |
66,613 |
|
|
$ |
56,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods ended September 30, are as follows (000s
omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(unaudited) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
789 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the Corporation had no impaired, nonaccrual loans and there were no loans
over 90 days past due and still accruing interest.
11
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 5 Deposits
Deposits are summarized as follows (000s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
7,897 |
|
|
$ |
5,195 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
7,819 |
|
|
|
7,882 |
|
Savings and money market accounts |
|
|
20,405 |
|
|
|
10,571 |
|
Certificates of deposit <$100,000 |
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
13,089 |
|
Certificates of deposit >$100,000 |
|
|
23,265 |
|
|
|
21,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
72,591 |
|
|
$ |
57,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the scheduled maturities of time deposits maturing are as follows (000s
omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<$100,000 |
|
|
>$100,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
Within 12 months |
|
$ |
10,751 |
|
|
$ |
16,717 |
|
|
$ |
27,468 |
|
> 12 months |
|
|
2,454 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
9,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,205 |
|
|
$ |
23,265 |
|
|
$ |
36,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Leases and Commitments
The Corporation has entered into a lease agreement for its main office. Payments began in
February 2005 and the initial term of the lease expires in October 2015. In October 2007, the
Corporation exercised its first renewal option on the property which expires in October 2025.
The main office lease has one additional ten year renewal option. The Corporation also entered
into a lease agreement for its branch office in Bloomfield Township. Payments began in March
2006 and the lease expires February 2016. The Bloomfield branch office lease has one five year
renewal option. Refer to Management Discussion and Analysis for additional information regarding
the Bloomfield office lease. Rent expense under the lease agreements was $70,000 and $68,000 for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Rent expense under the lease
agreements was $209,000 and $205,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments under operating leases on a
calendar year basis (000s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
2010 |
|
|
286 |
|
2011 |
|
|
292 |
|
2012 |
|
|
298 |
|
2013 |
|
|
304 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
12
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between
willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon
quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the
Corporations various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.
Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate
and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in
an immediate settlement of the instrument. FASB ASC 825 (formerly SFAS 107) excludes certain
financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements.
Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the
underlying fair value of the Corporation.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents - The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair
values.
Securities - Fair values of securities are based on quoted market prices. If a quoted market
price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar
securities.
Loans Receivable - For variable-rate loans that re-price frequently and with no significant
change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for other loans
are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered
for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values of
nonperforming loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral
values, where applicable.
Deposit Liabilities - The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to
the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying
amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit
approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of
deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates
currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities
on time deposits.
Accrued Interest - The carrying value of accrued interest approximates fair value.
Other Financial Instruments - The fair value of other financial instruments, including loan
commitments and unfunded letters of credit, based on discounted cash flow analyses, is not
material.
13
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 7 Fair Value of Financial Instruments continued
The carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,331 |
|
|
$ |
9,331 |
|
|
$ |
4,663 |
|
|
$ |
4,663 |
|
Securities available for
sale |
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
4,406 |
|
|
|
3,880 |
|
|
|
3,880 |
|
Loans |
|
|
67,485 |
|
|
|
67,471 |
|
|
|
56,841 |
|
|
|
57,273 |
|
Accrued interest
receivable |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
72,591 |
|
|
|
74,869 |
|
|
|
57,748 |
|
|
|
57,897 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
14
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 8 Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by
federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt
corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and
classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital
requirements can initiate regulatory action. The prompt corrective action regulations provide
four classifications, well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized and critically
undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If
adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If
undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and plans
for capital restoration are required. The Bank of Birmingham was well-capitalized as of September
30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the Corporation qualifies for an exemption from regulatory
capital requirements due to its asset size.
The Banks actual capital amounts and ratios as of September 30, 2009 are presented in the
following table (000s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
To be |
|
|
Actual |
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
|
Amount |
|
Ratio |
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
(to risk weighted assets)
Bank of Birmingham |
|
$ |
8,775 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,407 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,758 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
(to risk weighted assets)
Bank of Birmingham |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
$ |
2,703 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,055 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
(to average assets)
Bank of Birmingham |
|
$ |
7,920 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
3,389 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
4,236 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
(to risk weighted assets)
Bank of Birmingham |
|
$ |
9,345 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
$ |
4,491 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,614 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
(to risk weighted assets)
Bank of Birmingham |
|
$ |
8,635 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,246 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,369 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital
(to average assets)
Bank of Birmingham |
|
$ |
8,635 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
$ |
2,695 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,369 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
15
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Disclosure Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements throughout that are based on managements beliefs,
assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the financial services industry,
the economy, and about the Corporation and the Bank. Words such as anticipates, believes,
estimates, expects, forecasts, intends, is likely, plans, projects, variations of such words and
similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are intended to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and
involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to
timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence. Actual results and outcomes may materially
differ from what may be expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. The Corporation
undertakes no obligation to update, amend, or clarify forward looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events (whether anticipated or unanticipated), or otherwise.
Future factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or
projected include, but are not limited to, the following: the credit risks of lending activities,
including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in
estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; competitive pressures among depository
institutions, especially in light of increased consolidation within the industry; our ability to
recruit and retain personnel required to support our growth and expansion and maintain the level of
expertise necessary to support operational compliance; the ability to control expenses in this very
difficult economic environment and era of special assessments from the FDIC and additional
government oversight; interest rate movements and their impact on customer behavior and net
interest margin; the impact of re-pricing and competitors pricing initiatives on loan and deposit
products; the ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to meet customers needs and
development in the market place; our ability to manage and access cost-effective funding; changes
in economic conditions in general and particularly as related to the automotive and related
industries in the Detroit metropolitan area; new legislation or regulatory changes, including but
not limited to changes in federal and/or state tax laws or interpretations thereof by taxing
authorities; changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; and our future acquisitions
of other depository institutions or lines of business. These risks and uncertainties should be
considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such
statements. Further information concerning and Corporation and its business, including additional
factors that could materially affect the Corporations financial results, is included in its
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
16
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
OVERVIEW
Economic conditions have worsened for banks in general and particularly in Michigan as the U.S.
economy has fallen into a recession. The nations economy as a whole including the banking
industry has experienced significant downturns resulting in losses, additional government
intervention and oversight, and additional expense from FDIC special assessments within our
industry. The Bank has been very prudent in lending practices and those efforts continue to show
a very clean loan portfolio through the third quarter of the year. Through managements ongoing
review of operations it was determined that the Bloomfield Hills branch location was not
contributing to the profitability of the company in the manner anticipated. On October 1, 2009 the
Corporation entered into an agreement with the lease holder for that location to terminate the
lease effective January 18, 2010. The lease had an original termination date in February 2016.
While the cost related to the closure of this location is expected to negatively impact earnings
for 2009, the closure will aid in the reduction of ongoing operational costs which have been a
hindrance in our efforts to achieve profitability. It is expected that the closure costs will be
approximately $630,000 incurred in the fourth quarter that will allow for cost savings of
approximately $300,000 per year going forward.
The Bank continues to use its capital for customer loans, investments and other general banking
purposes. The Corporations initial offering proceeds have enabled the Bank to maintain a leverage
capital ratio, which is a measure of core capital to average total assets, in excess of 8% for the
first three years of operations as required by the FDIC. The Bank is no longer in de novo status
as of July 27, 2009. The Corporation does anticipate that it will require $4.0 to $6.0 million in
additional equity during the next 36 months of operations in order to continue to grow while
meeting regulatory capital requirements. The Corporation has participated in the Governments
Capital Purchase Program, receiving $1.635 million in capital through the program to fulfill a
portion of that need. A second application has been sent in for additional funding available under
the program. No determination on the application has been made by the appropriate agencies as of
this filing. Management is exploring additional options within the capital markets with the aid of
consultants to determine how and when it may raise the anticipated necessary equity.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
At September 30, 2009, the Corporations total assets were $82.8 million, an increase of $15.5
million or 23.1% from December 31, 2008. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $4.7 million or
100.1%. Investment securities increased $.5 million or 13.5% from December 31, 2008 to September
30, 2009. Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, increased by $10.5 million or 18.7% from
December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009. Total deposits increased by $14.8 million or 25.7% from
December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009. Basic and diluted loss per share for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 were $(0.08) per share and $(0.52) per share, respectively. These
numbers include the impact of the Corporations participation in the Capital Purchase Program
through the Department of Treasury. Basic and diluted loss per share for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 were $(0.13) per share and $(0.70) per share, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents increased $4.7 million or 100.1% to $9.3 million at September 30, 2009 up
from $4.7 million at December 31, 2008. This difference is due to a decrease in Federal funds sold
of $1.0 million and an increase in cash due to $1.6 million received through the Government Capital
Purchase Plan, $1.5 million from the State of Michigan CD Stimulus program, and $2.6 million in
certificates of deposit and new customer deposits. These funds will be utilized for future
anticipated loan fundings.
17
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Investments
Total investment securities available-for-sale increased $526,000 or 13.5% to $4.4 million at
September 30, 2009, compared to $3.9 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in investment
securities is primarily attributable to $2.8 million in U.S. Government agency security purchases
and the purchase of $162,100 in FHLBI stock, offset by the sale of a corporate security and the
call of four U.S. Government agency securities, resulting in an approximate decrease of $2.3
million. The remaining offset was due to repayments on mortgage backed securities. The Bank had no
held to maturity securities as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
Loans, Credit Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses
During the first nine months of 2009, loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, increased $10.5
million or 18.7%, to $66.6 million at September 30, 2009 up from $56.1 million at December 31,
2008. The largest single category increase within loans, as noted in Note 4 to the financial
statements, was commercial non real estate loans which increased by $3.8 million or 46.4% to $12.1
million at September 30, 2009. Multifamily real estate increased by $3.5 million or 46.1% to $11.2
million at September 30, 2009. Commercial real estate increased by $6.2 million or 26.9% to $29.3
million at the current quarter end. These loans are for the most part owner occupied properties.
These increases are due in part to increased draws on existing lines as well as continued business
development efforts.
The allowance for loan losses was $872,000 or 1.29% of loans at September 30, 2009. For the three
and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, there was one home equity line of credit loan
charge off for approximately $18,000 due to it becoming a probate matter, which occurred in the
second quarter of 2009. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, there were
two loan charge-offs totaling approximately $198,000 in the third quarter, a commercial term loan
for $173,000 and a consumer line of credit for $25,000. The Corporation had no loan recoveries
during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009. In the second quarter of 2008,
the Corporation did recover approximately $84,000 on a loan charged-off from 2007. There were no
loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest at September 30, 2009 or 2008.
The primary risk element considered by management regarding each consumer and residential real
estate loan is lack of timely payment. Management has a reporting system that monitors past due
loans and has adopted policies to pursue its creditors rights in order to preserve the Banks
position. The primary risk elements concerning commercial and industrial loans and commercial real
estate loans are the financial condition of the borrower, the sufficiency of collateral, and lack
of timely payment. Management has a policy of requesting and reviewing annual financial statements
from its commercial loan customers and periodically reviews existence of collateral and its value.
Management evaluates the condition of the loan portfolio monthly and again on a quarterly basis to
determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Managements evaluation of the allowance
is further based on consideration of actual loss experience, the present and prospective financial
condition of borrowers, adequacy of collateral, industry concentrations within the portfolio, and
general economic conditions. Management believes that the present allowance is currently adequate,
based on the broad range of considerations listed above. However, management planned a gradual
increase in the ratio of loan loss reserve to total loans to around 1.30% for 2009 due to the
continued unstable economic environment that the corporation is operating within.
Although management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb losses as
they arise, there can be no assurance that the Corporation will not sustain losses in any given
period that could be substantial in relation to the size of the allowance for credit losses.
Inherent risks and uncertainties related to the operation of a financial institution require
management to depend on estimates, appraisals and evaluations of loans to prepare the
Corporations financial statements. Changes in economic conditions and the financial prospects of
borrowers may result in changes to the estimates, appraisals and evaluations used. In addition, if
circumstances and losses differ
18
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
substantially from managements assumptions and estimates, the allowance for loan losses may not be
sufficient to absorb all future losses and net income could be significantly impacted.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment, net of depreciation, was $2.0 million as of September 30, 2009 and $2.2
million at December 31, 2008. Due to the anticipated branch closure the Corporation will
experience a write off of premises and equipment that are associated with that location. The
charge will be approximately $498,000 during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Corporation currently
is anticipating a change in data processing service providers during the first quarter of 2010.
This change may require some additional hardware purchases, however these are not anticipated to
have a material impact on expenses.
Deposits
Total deposits were $72.6 million at September 30, 2009, an increase of $14.8 million over December
31, 2008. In the deposit categories, noninterest bearing DDA deposits were $7.9 million, which
were made up primarily of business accounts. NOW accounts which, except for limited circumstances,
are owned by individuals were $7.8 million at September 30, 2009, while Money Market accounts were
$9.8 million and Savings accounts were $10.6 million at the current quarter end. Certificates of
deposit were $36.5 million at September 30, 2009. Of this amount $23.3 million was in certificates
greater than $100,000. Beginning in February 2008, the Corporation began advertising its rates on
certain certificates of deposits on a national certificate of deposit network, which has attracted
some deposits from outside the local market. We will continue to utilize this avenue to
supplement our deposit base as we continue to focus on growing our portion of the local retail and
commercial deposit market. We have also chosen to participate in the MI-CD program with the State
of Michigan. This program allows us to acquire State of Michigan certificate of deposit funds at
below market rates to aid in the funding of our loan portfolio. Currently, $1.5 million in these
funds are included in our time deposits over $100,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
(000s omitted) |
|
Balance |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Noninterest bearing demand |
|
$ |
7,897 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
7,819 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Money market |
|
|
9,845 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
Savings |
|
|
10,560 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
Time deposits under $100,000 |
|
|
13,205 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Time deposits over $100,000 |
|
|
23,265 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
72,591 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $748,000 and
$532,000 respectively. Interest income on loans was $1,038,000 and $818,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The growth in interest income on loans was driven
by continued growth in the loan portfolio. Deposit interest expense of $337,000 and $352,000 for
the three month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, decreased due to the
growth in savings accounts and certificates of deposit accounts being offset by significantly lower
interest rates offered during the 3rd quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008.
The following table shows the Corporations consolidated average balances of assets, liabilities,
and equity. The table also details the amount of interest income or interest expense and the
average yield or rate for each category of interest-earning asset or interest-bearing liability as
well as the net interest margin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
67,801 |
|
|
$ |
1,038,306 |
|
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
$ |
53,000 |
|
|
$ |
817,556 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
Securities |
|
|
3,773 |
|
|
|
36,437 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
% |
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
42,176 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
|
23,711 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
% |
Interest-bearing balance with
other financial institutions |
|
|
8,092 |
|
|
|
9,526 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
81,982 |
|
|
|
1,085,288 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
61,684 |
|
|
|
883,443 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other assets |
|
|
1,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
84,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
8,040 |
|
|
|
13,474 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
$ |
7,615 |
|
|
|
32,950 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
% |
Money market |
|
|
10,261 |
|
|
|
26,402 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
60,999 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
10,038 |
|
|
|
39,102 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
37,495 |
|
|
|
258,243 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
28,372 |
|
|
|
254,294 |
|
|
|
3.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
65,834 |
|
|
|
337,221 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
48,616 |
|
|
|
351,789 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
8,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other liabilities |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
74,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
10,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
84,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
748,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
531,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
124.53 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net interest earnings divided by average interest-earning assets. |
20
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $1.9 million and $1.4
million respectively. Interest income on loans was $2.8 million and $2.2 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As indicated above, the growth in interest
income on loans was driven by continued growth in the loan portfolio. Significant growth in
interest bearing deposit balances, offset by significantly lower interest rates offered in 2009,
resulted in consistent levels of deposit interest expense. Interest expense was $1.0 million for
the two nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The following table shows the Corporations consolidated average balances of assets, liabilities,
and equity. The table also details the amount of interest income or interest expense and the
average yield or rate for each category of interest-earning asset or interest-bearing liability and
the net interest margin for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
62,782 |
|
|
$ |
2,774,781 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
% |
|
$ |
46,756 |
|
|
$ |
2,196,208 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
% |
Securities |
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
110,948 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
2,616 |
|
|
|
97,811 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
2,544 |
|
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
6,386 |
|
|
|
113,841 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
% |
Interest-bearing balance with
other financial institutions |
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
17,122 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
73,807 |
|
|
|
2,905,785 |
|
|
|
5.25 |
% |
|
|
55,758 |
|
|
|
2,407,860 |
|
|
|
5.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
1,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other assets |
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
77,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW accounts |
|
$ |
7,837 |
|
|
|
52,314 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
$ |
8,109 |
|
|
|
124,318 |
|
|
|
2.04 |
% |
Money market |
|
|
10,128 |
|
|
|
91,091 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
11,797 |
|
|
|
202,547 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
Savings |
|
|
7,674 |
|
|
|
95,054 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
34,468 |
|
|
|
766,621 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
22,409 |
|
|
|
671,975 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
60,107 |
|
|
|
1,005,080 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
42,816 |
|
|
|
1,005,217 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits |
|
|
6,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other liabilities |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
67,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
9,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders
equity |
|
$ |
77,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,900,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,402,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
122.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net interest earnings divided by average interest-earning assets. |
21
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The yield on interest-earning assets decreased for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to 5.30%
from 5.73% as compared to the same period in the prior year. Much of the decrease was due to
reductions in the yield in the loan portfolio, particularly within the variable rate home equity
portfolio with the prime rate changes that originally occurred during 2008 and have carried through
2009. The yield on loans receivable decreased to 6.13% for the three months ended September 30,
2009 from 6.17% for the same period in 2008. The Corporations interest rate spread increased for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 to 3.25% from 2.84% for the same period in 2008. The
Corporation has benefited from an improvement in the spread on interest rates as reductions in the
cost of deposits outpaced the reduction in loan yields. In the prior year, deposit rates were
higher due to the competitive market as well as promotional rates offered by us as a de novo
institution to attract and build the customer base. Net interest margin increased to 3.65% for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 up from 3.45% for the same period in 2008.
The yield on interest-earning assets decreased for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009
to 5.25% from 5.76% as compared to the same period in the prior year. The yield on loans
receivable decreased to 5.89% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, down from 6.26% for the
same period in 2008. As indicated above, these decreases relate directly to decreases in the prime
lending rate throughout 2008. The Corporations interest rate spread increased for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 to 3.02%, up from 2.63% for the same period in 2008. Net interest margin
increased to 3.43% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, up from 3.35% for the same period
in 2008. Management expects that the excess liquidity held in federal funds sold and Federal
Reserve balances will be utilized in the fourth quarter through continued loan growth, depletion of
deposits due to non-renewal of certain higher rate certificates and the purchase of higher yield
investment products, which will improve the yield on interest earning assets.
Provision for Loans Losses
The provision for loan losses was $32,000 and $109,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease from the previous comparable period in provision for
loan losses was due to the loan portfolio declining by $1.06 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, while the increase in the loan portfolio for the same period in 2008 was $6.48
million. The provision for loan losses was $180,000 and $254,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The 2008 number included a specific reserve on a loan
placed on non-accrual status during the second quarter. Due to the continuing difficult economic
conditions, management has decided to gradually increase the provision to build our loan loss
reserve levels to a more conservative 1.30% of total loans during 2009.
Non-Interest Income
Non-interest income was $27,000 and $35,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. This decrease is primarily due to decreases in official check and wire transfer
activity fees. Loan fees and charges increased to approximately $4,300 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, up from $3,200 for the same period in 2008. Deposit fees and charges increased
to $20,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, up from $15,500 for the same period in
2008. Other income decreased to approximately
$3,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, down from $16,000 for the same period in 2008.
This decrease is due to a gain recognized on the sale of a mortgage backed security in the
3rd quarter of 2008.
Non-interest income was $77,500 and $96,500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Loan fees and charges decreased to approximately $10,000 for the first nine months
of 2009 compared to $15,000 for the same period in 2008. This decrease is due to a prepayment
penalty on a commercial loan payoff in January 2008. Deposit fees and charges increased to
approximately $54,800 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, up from approximately $53,300
for the same period in 2008. Other income decreased to approximately $12,700 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, down from approximately $28,100 for
22
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
the same period in 2008. This decrease is due primarily to gains recognized for calls on two
investment securities in 2009 totaling approximately $3,000, while gains recognized for calls on
certain investment securities in 2008 totaled approximately $19,300.
Non-Interest Expense
Non-interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $867,500 and
$692,000 respectively. Salaries and benefits continued to be the largest component of non-interest
expense. Salaries and benefits increased $96,800, or 32.1%, to $398,600 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 up from $301,800 for the same period of 2008. The current period included
salaries for an increase of three additional employees, none of which were included in salaries for
the same period in 2008. Occupancy expenses decreased slightly to $192,000 for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 from $199,000 for the same period of 2008. Data processing expenses were
$54,800 for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to $48,000 for the same
period in 2008 mainly due to loan and deposit growth and price increases from the vendor.
Advertising expenses were $(650) for the three months ended September 30, 2009, down from $10,100
as compared to the same period in 2008. The negative advertising expense for the current three
month period is due to the partial reversal of an accrual booked in February 2009 for marketing
expenses presented for payment, which related to prior years. These expenses were paid in September
but at a negotiated 25% discount; therefore the remaining accrual was reversed. Professional fees
were $72,700 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $66,000 for the same period
in 2008. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the Corporation recognized $9,800 for legal
expenses related to the Capital Purchase Program Participation, which was not applicable to the
same period in 2008. Other expenses increased to $138,100 for the three months ended September 30,
2009 compared to $95,300 for the same period in 2008. This increase is due in large part to
regulatory assessment expenses being $50,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to $19,000 for the same period in 2008. This increase is tied to the Corporations deposit growth
from the same period in the prior year.
Non-interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $2.71 million and
$2.50 million, respectively. Salaries and benefits increased $13,000, or 1.1%, to $1.176 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, up from $1.163 million for the same period of 2008.
In the first quarter of 2008, management of the Corporation reduced staffing in several key areas.
This decrease in compensation expense remained throughout 2008 and into 2009. The staff additions
made during the second quarter of this year has since offset this compensation reduction.
Occupancy expenses remained relatively stable at $607,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 down from $616,000 for the same period of 2008. Data processing expenses were $159,000 for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to $135,000 for the same period in 2008.
These increased costs are due to increases in volume in the current year which is the basis for
most of the data processing costs. In addition, increased ATM usage has increased the ATM
transaction fees incurred in the current year. Advertising expenses remained relatively stable at
$56,600 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, down from $69,700 as compared to the same
period in 2008. Professional fees were $270,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to $226,000 for the same period in 2008. The increase was related to
specific programs which required legal review and are not expected to be recurring. Other
expenses increased to $396,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $302,000
for the same period in 2008. Regulatory assessments accounted for the majority of the difference.
The increase in our deposit base will continue to increase the normal deposit insurance assessment,
and the FDIC has the ability to assess additional special assessments across the industry as
needed. The FDIC has issued a notice of proposed rule making that would allow it to replenish the
deposit insurance fund by requiring financial institutions to prepay share insurance assessments
for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010 through 2012 on December 31, 2009. The comment
period extended through October 28, 2009, but the rule would be effective immediately upon
adoption. The payment of an estimated $475,000 would be recorded on the Corporations books as a
prepaid asset that would be written down over the appropriate periods.
23
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Income Taxes
No income tax expense or benefit was recognized during the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2009 or 2008 due to the tax loss carry-forward position of the Corporation. An
income tax benefit may be booked in future periods when the Corporation begins to turn a profit and
management believes that profitability will be expected for the foreseeable future beyond that
point.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES; ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Bank liquidity depends upon the mix of the banking institutions potential sources and uses of
funds. The major sources of liquidity for the Bank have been deposit growth, federal funds sold,
and loans which mature within one year. Large deposit balances which might fluctuate in response to
interest rate changes are closely monitored. These deposits consist mainly of certificates of
deposit over $100,000. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet our
future commitments. As of September 30, 2009, unused commitments totaled $19.3 million. As a
majority of the unused commitments represent commercial and equity lines of credit. Experience has
shown that only a small portion of the unused commitments will normally be drawn upon. While we
expect to see an increase in advances on the home equity lines of credit under these tough economic
times, we believe that these usage numbers will not be excessive or have a major impact on our
liquidity needs. A large portion (70%), of the Banks time deposits of $36.5 million matures
within twelve months from September 30, 2009. This is on par with June 30, 2009, but down
significantly from December 31, 2008 when 95% of deposits matured within one year. The Bank
continues to focus on restructuring the deposit side of the balance sheet, extending the duration
of those deposits to mitigate the effects of our liability sensitive position. We have been able
to negate the negative impact of rising rates on our potential earnings over the short term.
Several alternative funding sources have developed to supplement our deposit base in order to
satisfy our liquidity needs. We utilize an online listing service that allows us to bring in
deposits from outside the local marketplace and we have chosen to participate in the State of
Michigans MI-CD program, which allows us to pull in below market rate certificate of deposit
dollars to aid in the funding of our loan portfolio. In addition, our application to the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis has been approved and a credit line with the Federal Reserve Bank
was established to provide additional funding sources should they be needed.
The largest uses and sources of cash and cash equivalents for the Corporation for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as noted in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, were centered primarily
on the uses of cash in investing activities and the net cash provided by financing activities. The
uses of cash in investing activities were largely due to increases in the loan portfolio, and the
cash provided from increases in deposits contributed to the total cash and cash equivalents at the
end of September 30, 2009 of $9.3 million, which was an increase of $4.7 million from $4.7 million
at December 31, 2008.
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by
federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for Banks, prompt
corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and
classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital
requirements can initiate regulatory action. The Bank was well-capitalized as of September 30,
2009. Note 7 to the financial statements are hereby incorporated by reference. At September 30,
2009, the Corporation qualifies for an exemption from regulatory capital requirements due to its
asset size. The Corporation does anticipate that it will require $4.0 to $6.0 million in
additional equity during the next 36 months of operations in order to continue to grow while
meeting regulatory capital requirements. Management applied for and was granted in April 2009 $1.6
million in funding under the U.S. Treasurys Capital Purchase Program as part of our
equity plan. A second application has been sent in for additional funding available under the
program. No determination on the application has been made by the appropriate agencies as of this
filing. Management is exploring additional options within the capital markets with the aid of
consultants to determine how and when it may raise the anticipated equity management feels will be
required to continue to expand our business in a controlled and prudent manner.
24
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Managing rates on earning assets and interest bearing liabilities focuses on maintaining stability
in the net interest margin, an important factor in earnings growth and stability. Emphasis is
placed on maintaining a controlled rate sensitivity position to avoid wide swings in margins and to
manage risk due to changes in interest rates. Some of the major areas of focus of the Corporations
Asset Liability Committee (ALCO) incorporate the following overview functions: review the
interest rate risk sensitivity of the Bank to measure the impact of changing interest rates on the
Banks net interest income, review the liquidity position through various measurements, review
current and projected economic conditions and the corresponding impact on the Bank, ensure that
capital and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses are maintained at proper levels to sustain
growth, monitor the investment portfolio, recommend policies and strategies to the Board that
incorporate a better balance of our interest rate risk, liquidity, balance sheet mix and yield
management, and review the current balance sheet mix and proactively determine the future product
mix.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2009, unused commitments totaled $19.3 million. As a majority of the unused
commitments represent commercial and equity lines of credit, the Bank has experienced a moderate
increase in line usage during 2009 which is not unexpected and has caused no undue burden to the
Corporation.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Corporations primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk and liquidity risk. All of
the Corporations transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no specific foreign exchange
exposure. Any impacts that changes in foreign exchange rates would have on interest rates are
assumed to be insignificant.
Interest rate risk (IRR) is the exposure of a banking organizations financial condition to adverse
movements in interest rates. Accordingly, effective risk management that maintains IRR at prudent
levels is essential to the Corporations safety and soundness. The Board of Directors has
instituted a policy setting limits on the amount of interest rate risk that may be assumed.
Management evaluates the Corporations level of risk through a series of measurement techniques
including gap analysis, earning simulations, and economic value of equity simulations. This
detailed process is performed on a quarterly basis, but is managed daily. The Bank continues to be
in a liability sensitive position and management continues to work toward creating a more closely
matched portfolio to minimize any potential impact that changing rates could have on earnings in
the short term. The institution is well positioned with the latest balance sheet shock analysis
showing that over the long term, rate changes pose only a minimal risk to our economic value of
equity (EVE ratio).This information is provided to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis
detailing interest rate risk estimates and activities to mitigate such risk.
The Corporation has not experienced a material change in its financial instruments that are
sensitive to changes in interest rates since December 31, 2008, which information can be located in
the Corporations annual report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report we carried out an evaluation under the
supervision and with the participation of the Corporations management, including the Corporations
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e).
Based on this evaluation, the Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report such disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and
25
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
accumulated and communicated to the Corporations management, including the Corporations Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Corporations management
recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and in reaching a reasonable
level of assurance. The Corporations management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
There were no changes in the Corporations internal controls over financial reporting during the
period ended September 30, 2009 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Corporations internal controls over financial reporting.
26
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
There are no known pending legal proceedings to which the Corporation or the Bank is a party or to
which any of its properties are subject; nor are there material proceedings known to the
Corporation, in which any director, officer or affiliate or any principal shareholder is a party or
has an interest adverse to the Corporation or the Bank.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
This item is not applicable.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
This item is not applicable.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
This item is not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
This item is not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
This item is not applicable.
27
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 02 2002. |
28
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
|
|
Date: November 13, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Robert E. Farr
|
|
|
|
Robert E. Farr |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 13, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Deb Thompson
|
|
|
|
Deb Thompson |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
29
BIRMINGHAM BLOOMFIELD BANCSHARES, INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
31.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of
the Securities Exchange Act |
31.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of
the Securities Exchange Act |
32.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. §1350 |
30