e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
Commission File Number
001-34420
Globe Specialty Metals,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-2055624
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
One Penn Plaza
250 West 34th Street, Suite 2514
New York, NY 10119
(Address of principal executive
offices, including zip code)
(212) 798-8122
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of February 12, 2010, the registrant had
74,320,187 shares of common stock outstanding.
Globe
Specialty Metals, Inc.
2
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
252,231
|
|
|
|
61,876
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,270 and $1,390 at December 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009, respectively
|
|
|
36,673
|
|
|
|
24,094
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
54,508
|
|
|
|
67,394
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
12,123
|
|
|
|
24,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
355,535
|
|
|
|
178,039
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
188,803
|
|
|
|
217,507
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
51,836
|
|
|
|
51,828
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
1,231
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
7,928
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
15,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
607,155
|
|
|
|
473,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
36,505
|
|
|
|
21,341
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
9,641
|
|
|
|
16,561
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
14,013
|
|
|
|
6,688
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
58,974
|
|
|
|
46,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
119,133
|
|
|
|
91,315
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
12,730
|
|
|
|
36,364
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
14,549
|
|
|
|
18,890
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
14,782
|
|
|
|
15,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
161,194
|
|
|
|
161,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized,
150,000,000 shares; issued, 74,320,187 and
66,944,254 shares at December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2009, respectively
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
384,404
|
|
|
|
303,364
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
31,636
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(3,676
|
)
|
|
|
(3,644
|
)
|
Treasury stock at cost, 1,000 shares at December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. stockholders equity
|
|
|
412,367
|
|
|
|
304,383
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
33,594
|
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
445,961
|
|
|
|
311,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
607,155
|
|
|
|
473,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations
Three and six months ended December 31,
2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
108,278
|
|
|
|
119,307
|
|
|
$
|
213,736
|
|
|
|
268,464
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
87,974
|
|
|
|
91,957
|
|
|
|
167,952
|
|
|
|
199,095
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,142
|
|
|
|
19,668
|
|
|
|
25,865
|
|
|
|
33,700
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of business
|
|
|
(23,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
30,466
|
|
|
|
(62,161
|
)
|
|
|
42,792
|
|
|
|
(34,767
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest
|
|
|
(1,101
|
)
|
|
|
(2,118
|
)
|
|
|
(2,419
|
)
|
|
|
(4,169
|
)
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
(2,117
|
)
|
|
|
3,286
|
|
|
|
(3,426
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
30,500
|
|
|
|
(65,584
|
)
|
|
|
44,052
|
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
12,568
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
17,951
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
17,932
|
|
|
|
(63,256
|
)
|
|
|
26,101
|
|
|
|
(46,677
|
)
|
Losses attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Globe Specialty Metals,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
18,534
|
|
|
|
(61,521
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
(44,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
74,314
|
|
|
|
63,455
|
|
|
|
72,710
|
|
|
|
63,296
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
75,154
|
|
|
|
63,455
|
|
|
|
73,844
|
|
|
|
63,296
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(0.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(0.97
|
)
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Stockholders Equity
Six months ended December 31, 2009
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
at Cost
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
66,944
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
303,364
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
(3,644
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,352
|
|
Warrants exercised
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
UPOs exercised
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
Stock issuance
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,768
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,768
|
|
Sale of noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,043
|
|
Realized gain on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on
available-for-sale
securities (net of provision for income taxes of $1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(875
|
)
|
|
|
26,101
|
|
|
|
26,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,080
|
|
|
|
26,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
74,320
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
384,404
|
|
|
|
31,636
|
|
|
|
(3,676
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
33,594
|
|
|
|
26,080
|
|
|
|
445,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
26,101
|
|
|
|
(46,677
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,813
|
|
|
|
9,933
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
3,196
|
|
Gain on sale of business
|
|
|
(22,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(4,548
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(17,079
|
)
|
|
|
13,061
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
|
|
(12,147
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
9,413
|
|
|
|
(2,882
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
21,616
|
|
|
|
(8,446
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(17,283
|
)
|
|
|
(1,047
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2,946
|
|
|
|
4,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,761
|
|
|
|
24,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(9,915
|
)
|
|
|
(34,754
|
)
|
Sale of business and noncontrolling interest, net of cash
disposed of $16,555
|
|
|
158,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity
treasury securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,987
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(4,685
|
)
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
143,845
|
|
|
|
(31,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from warrants exercised
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
833
|
|
Proceeds from UPOs exercised
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(16,558
|
)
|
|
|
(4,704
|
)
|
Net borrowings (payments) of short-term debt
|
|
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
(3,453
|
)
|
Sale of common stock
|
|
|
36,456
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solsil, Inc. common share issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,580
|
)
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(937
|
)
|
|
|
(2,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
27,782
|
|
|
|
(11,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
190,355
|
|
|
|
(18,673
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
61,876
|
|
|
|
73,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
252,231
|
|
|
|
55,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds totaling $2,729 and
$0, respectively
|
|
|
3,604
|
|
|
|
8,029
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
7
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
(1)
|
Organization
and Business Operations
|
Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. and subsidiary companies (the
Company, we, or our) is among the worlds largest producers
of silicon metal and silicon-based alloys, important ingredients
in a variety of industrial and consumer products. The
Companys customers include major silicone chemical,
aluminum and steel manufacturers, auto companies and their
suppliers, ductile iron foundries, manufacturers of photovoltaic
solar cells and computer chips, and concrete producers.
|
|
(2)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
In the opinion of the Companys management, the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include
all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP) of the results for the
interim periods presented and such adjustments are of a normal,
recurring nature. The accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. There have been no
material changes to the Companys significant accounting
policies during the six months ended December 31, 2009,
except as discussed below under Recently Implemented Accounting
Pronouncements.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts
to conform to current year presentation, including the
reclassification of $1,815 and $3,256 from selling, general, and
administrative expenses to cost of goods sold for the three and
six months ended December 31, 2008, respectively, as,
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company
reevaluated certain expenses and deemed these to be production
costs. In addition, the Company reclassified $461 in transaction
costs associated with the Dow Corning transactions (see
note 3) incurred during the first quarter of fiscal
year 2010 from selling, general, and administrative expenses to
gain on sale of business.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect amounts reported in the condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes. Significant
estimates and assumptions in these condensed consolidated
financial statements include the valuation of inventories; the
carrying amount of property, plant, and equipment; goodwill and
long-lived asset impairment tests; estimates of fair value of
investments; provision for (benefit from) income taxes and
deferred tax valuation allowances; valuation of derivative
instruments; the determination of the discount rate and the rate
of return on plan assets for pension expense; and the
determination of the fair value of share-based compensation
involving assumptions about forfeiture rates, stock volatility,
discount rates, and expected time to exercise. During interim
periods, provision for (benefit from) income taxes is recognized
using an estimated annual effective tax rate. Due to the
inherent uncertainty involved in making estimates, actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Revenue is recognized in accordance with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104) when a
firm sales agreement is in place, delivery has occurred and
title and risks of ownership have passed to the customer, the
sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is
reasonably assured. Shipping and other transportation costs
charged to buyers are recorded in both net sales and cost
8
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
of goods sold. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted
to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis
and, therefore, are excluded from net sales. When the Company
provides a combination of products and services to customers,
the arrangement is evaluated under Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) ASC Subtopic
605-25,
Revenue Recognition Multiple Element Arrangements
(ASC 605.25). ASC 605.25 addresses certain aspects of
accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which the vendor
will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. If the
Company cannot objectively determine the fair value of any
undelivered elements under an arrangement, the Company defers
revenue until all elements are delivered and services have been
performed, or until fair value can objectively be determined for
any remaining undelivered elements.
|
|
e.
|
Recently
Implemented Accounting Pronouncements
|
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. This statement identifies the sources of
accounting principles used in the preparation of financial
statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in
conformity with U.S. GAAP (the GAAP hierarchy). This
statement establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(the Codification/ASC) as the source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, except for SEC
rules and interpretive releases, which are also authoritative
U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification standard
(FASB ASC Subtopic
105-10 on
generally accepted accounting principles) was adopted on
July 1, 2009. This change had no effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic
805-10,
Business Combinations. This statement establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer
(i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity,
(ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the
business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and
(iii) determines what information to disclose to enable
users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. This accounting
standard was adopted on July 1, 2009. This statement will
be applied prospectively to the Companys business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
July 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic
810-10,
Consolidation Consolidation of Entities
Controlled by Contract (ASC 810.10) and ASC Subtopic
815-40,
Derivatives and Hedging Contracts in
Entitys Own Equity (ASC 815.40). The Company adopted
ASC 810.10 and ASC 815.40 on July 1, 2009. The objective of
these statements is to improve the relevance, comparability, and
transparency of the financial information that a reporting
entity provides in its financial statements by establishing
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. In accordance with ASC 810.10 and ASC 815.40, the
Company has provided the enhanced disclosures required by ASC
810.10 and ASC 815.40 in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets and condensed consolidated statement of changes in
stockholders equity for all periods presented. See
note 14 (Stockholders Equity) for additional
information.
In September 2006, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). The
Company partially adopted ASC 820 on July 1, 2008. This
adoption did not have a material impact to the Companys
consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The
Company fully adopted ASC 820 on July 1, 2009. ASC 820
defines fair value, establishes a framework for the measurement
of fair value, and enhances disclosures about fair value
measurements. The statement does not require any new fair value
measures. The Company carries its derivative agreements at fair
value, determined using observable market based inputs. See
note 17 (Fair Value Measures) for additional information.
9
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
In September 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
740-10,
Income Taxes (ASC 740). The Company adopted this
amendment on September 30, 2009. This amendment to ASC 740
adds implementation guidance for all entities about applying the
accounting requirements for uncertain tax matters. The
implementation guidance is presented in examples and is not
intended to change practice for those already applying the
requirements. The implementation of this additional guidance had
no effect on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
|
|
f.
|
Accounting
Pronouncements to be Implemented
|
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
860-10,
Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860). The objective of this
amendment is to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a
reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a
transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred
financial assets. This amendment improves financial reporting by
eliminating (1) the exceptions for qualifying
special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and
(2) the exception that permitted sale accounting for
certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not
surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. This
amendment is effective for the Company on July 1, 2010. The
Company is currently assessing the potential effect of the
amendment of ASC 860 on its financial position and results of
operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
810-10,
Consolidation Variable Interest Entities (ASC
810). The objective of this amendment is to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities by eliminating the quantitative-based risks and rewards
calculation and requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis
to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling interest in a variable interest
entity. In addition, the amendment requires an ongoing
reassessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity. This amendment is effective for
the Company on July 1, 2010. The Company is currently
assessing the potential effect of the amendment to ASC 810 on
its financial position and results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
715-10,
Compensation Retirement Benefits (ASC 715).
This amendment provides guidance on an employers
disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or
other postretirement plan. The amendment requires employers of
public entities to disclose more information about how
investment allocation decisions are made, more information about
major categories of plan assets, including concentrations of
risk and fair-value measurements, and the fair-value techniques
and inputs used to measure plan assets. The disclosure
requirements of the amendment to ASC 715 are effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company
does not believe the amendment to ASC 715 will have a
significant impact on the Companys financial position and
results of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). This
amendment requires reporting entities to make new disclosures
about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements
including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and information about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in
the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The
amendment also clarifies existing fair value measurement
disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs,
and valuation techniques. The disclosure requirements of the
amendment to ASC 820, except for the detailed Level 3 roll
forward disclosures, is effective for annual and interim
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The
new disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the roll forward activity for Level 3 fair
value measurements are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The
Company is currently assessing the potential effect of the
amendment to ASC 820 on its financial position and results of
operations.
10
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
(3)
|
Dow
Corning Transactions
|
On November 5, 2009, the Company sold 100% of its interest
in Globe Metais Indústria e Comércio S.A. (Globe
Metais) pursuant to a purchase agreement entered into on that
same date by and among the Company and Dow Corning Corporation
(Dow Corning). The cash received by the Company in connection
with the disposition was approximately $65,600, which represents
a purchase price of $75,000 less withholding taxes and certain
expenses. Dow Corning assumed Globe Metais cash balances
totaling $16,555 and $14,000 of export prepayment financing. The
final purchase price is subject to adjustment for changes in
working capital as provided for in the purchase agreement.
The sale of the Companys equity interest in Globe Metais
was executed in connection with the sale of a 49% membership
interest in WVA Manufacturing, LLC (WVA LLC), a newly formed
entity by the Company, to Dow Corning, the execution of a
long-term supply agreement, and an amendment to an existing
supply agreement between Dow Corning and the Company to reduce
the amount required to be sold in calendar year 2010 to 20,000
metric tons of silicon metal.
For accounting purposes, the Company has allocated $75,000 of
the total purchase price received from Dow Corning to the sale
of the equity of Globe Metais and $100,000 to the sale of
membership interests in WVA LLC. The allocation of total
purchase price to the separate transactions was based on the
relative fair values of Globe Metais and the membership
interests in WVA LLC.
ASC 815.40 requires an entity to consolidate all subsidiaries
over which it has a controlling financial interest and considers
changes in the ownership interest while the entity retains its
controlling financial interest in the subsidiary as equity
transactions, resulting in no gain or loss recognition in the
statement of operations. As the Company retained a controlling
financial interest in WVA LLC, no gain has been recognized in
net income on the sale of the 49% membership interest. Rather,
noncontrolling interest has been adjusted to reflect the change
in our ownership interest in WVA LLC. The difference between the
fair value of the consideration received, net of transaction
costs of $1,548 and provision for income taxes of $28,827, and
the amount by which noncontrolling interest increased has been
recognized as an increase in additional paid-in capital.
|
|
(4)
|
Restructuring
Charges
|
During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company
implemented formal restructuring programs, including the
temporary shutdown of certain furnace operations and furloughing
or terminating employees. Cash payments associated with these
restructuring programs are expected to be completed in fiscal
year 2010. The restructuring programs include employee severance
and benefits, as well as costs associated with lease termination
obligations.
Activity during the six months ended December 31, 2009
related to the restructuring liability is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability at
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Adjustments(2)
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Severance and benefit-related costs(1)
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes severance payments made to employees, payroll taxes,
and other benefit-related costs in connection with the
terminations of employees. |
|
(2) |
|
Adjustments are for employees who were rehired by the Company in
conjunction with the restarting of certain furnace operations
during the six months ended December 31, 2009. |
11
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
Total restructuring expenses of $1,711 were incurred during
fiscal year 2009. The remaining unpaid liability as of
December 31, 2009 is included in accrued expenses and other
current liabilities. No additional costs are expected to be
incurred associated with these restructuring actions.
During March 2008, the Company purchased U.S. government
treasury securities with a term to maturity of 125 days.
The securities were redeemed for $2,987 during the first quarter
of fiscal year 2009.
Inventories comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
16,224
|
|
|
|
23,867
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
2,614
|
|
|
|
3,462
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
29,011
|
|
|
|
31,323
|
|
Parts and supplies
|
|
|
6,659
|
|
|
|
8,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,508
|
|
|
|
67,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, $46,100 in inventory is valued using
the
first-in,
first-out method and $8,408 using the average cost method. At
June 30, 2009, $46,712 in inventory is valued using the
first-in,
first-out method and $20,682 using the average cost method.
During the three and six months ended December 31, 2008,
the Company recorded inventory write-downs totaling $3,461 due
to expected lower net realizable values for certain Solsil, Inc.
(Solsil) and Ningxia Yonvey Coal Industrial Co., Ltd (Yonvey)
inventories. These write-downs have been recorded in cost of
goods sold. There were no significant inventory write-downs
during the three and six months ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
(7)
|
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
and amortization, comprise the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Land, land improvements, and land use rights
|
|
$
|
4,989
|
|
|
|
13,835
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
|
30,003
|
|
|
|
24,176
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
65,920
|
|
|
|
56,912
|
|
Furnaces
|
|
|
103,384
|
|
|
|
99,429
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
15,728
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
26,194
|
|
|
|
47,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, gross
|
|
|
232,974
|
|
|
|
257,337
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(44,171
|
)
|
|
|
(39,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
and amortization
|
|
$
|
188,803
|
|
|
|
217,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
Depreciation expense for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009 was $4,855 and $9,503, of which $4,762
and $9,283 is recorded in cost of goods sold and $93 and $220 is
recorded in selling, general, and administrative expenses,
respectively. Depreciation expense for the three and six months
ended December 31, 2008 was $4,321 and $8,594, of which
$4,226 and $8,385 is recorded in cost of goods sold and $95 and
$209 is recorded in selling, general, and administrative
expenses, respectively.
Capitalized interest for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2009 was $70 and $298, respectively.
Capitalized interest for the three and six months ended
December 31, 2008 was $334 and $514, respectively.
|
|
(8)
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangibles
|
Goodwill and other intangibles presented below have been
allocated to the Companys operating segments.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the six months
ended December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,828
|
|
Foreign exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
Other
Intangible Assets
|
Changes in the carrying amounts of definite lived intangible
assets during the six months ended December 31, 2009 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
7,905
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
Sale of Globe Metais (see note 3)
|
|
|
(5,073
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
7,151
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
Sale of Globe Metais (see note 3)
|
|
|
(4,629
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
2,832
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no changes in the value of the Companys
indefinite lived intangible assets during the six months ended
December 31, 2009. The trade name balance at both
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009 is $477.
Amortization expense of purchased intangible assets for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2009 was $46 and
$310, respectively, which is recorded in cost of goods sold.
Amortization expense of purchased intangible assets for the
three and six months ended December 31, 2008 was $669 and
$1,339, respectively, which is recorded in cost of goods sold.
13
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
c.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Asset Impairment
|
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company
experienced a decrease in profitability, and a significant
decline in demand for high purity solar-grade silicon.
Consistent with the guidance in ASC Subtopic 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other, the Company
performed an interim impairment test of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangible assets at the end of the second
quarter of fiscal year 2009. In performing this test, the
Company made a substantial downward revision in the forecasted
cash flows from its Solsil reporting unit as a result of a
decrease in the market price for solar-grade silicon and
weakness in demand for solar products. The Company recorded a
preliminary estimate of impairment charges totaling $65,196,
comprised of $57,512 of goodwill and $12,048 of unpatented
technology offset by the related deferred taxes totaling $4,364.
These impairment charges were entirely associated with the
Companys Solsil business unit. The impairment charges were
finalized in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, in
conjunction with the Companys annual impairment
assessment, resulting in an additional $144 goodwill impairment
charge.
Short-term debt comprises the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Credit Line
|
|
|
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,070
|
|
Export financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14,013
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
34,560
|
|
Export financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,400
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,688
|
|
|
|
6.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreements A summary of the
Companys revolving credit agreements at December 31,
2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Unused
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Commitment
|
|
|
Commitment
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
18,070
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the Dow Corning transactions discussed in
note 3, the Company agreed to modify the terms of its
senior credit facility, which included a reduction of revolving
credit from $35,000 to $28,000 in exchange for the release of
the assets of West Virginia Alloys as a security for the senior
credit facility. This revolving credit agreement expires in
September 2013. Interest on advances under the revolving credit
facility accrues at LIBOR plus an applicable margin percentage
or, at the Companys option, prime plus an applicable
margin percentage. The
14
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
amount available under the revolving credit facility is subject
to a borrowing base calculation. The total commitment on the
revolving credit facility includes $10,000 for letters of credit
associated with foreign supplier contracts. At December 31,
2009, there was no outstanding balance on this revolver. The
total commitment on this credit facility includes $8,120
outstanding letters of credit associated with foreign supplier
contracts and $1,810 outstanding letters of credit associated
with a power supply contract. The revolving credit facility is
secured by substantially all of the assets of Globe
Metallurgical, Inc. (GMI), and is subject to certain restrictive
and financial covenants, which include limits on additional
debt, restrictions on capital expenditures, restrictions on
dividend and other equity distributions, a maximum ratio of debt
to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization, and minimum net worth and interest coverage
requirements. The commitment under the revolving credit facility
may be withdrawn if the Company defaults under the terms of
these covenants or fails to remit payments when due. The Company
was in compliance with the loan covenants at December 31,
2009.
Export Financing Agreements The
Companys Argentine subsidiary maintains various short-term
export financing agreements. Generally, these arrangements are
for periods ranging between seven and eleven months, and require
the Company to pledge as collateral certain export accounts
receivable. There is no export financing debt outstanding at
December 31, 2009.
Other The Companys subsidiary, Yonvey,
has $7,324 in outstanding promissory notes, which mature through
August 2010. The notes accrue interest at rates ranging from
5.3% to 8.5%. The promissory notes are secured by certain Yonvey
assets. In addition, the balance includes $5,880 in short-term
notes payable to Dow Corning related to working capital loans
given to WVA LLC, which accrue interest at 3.0%.
Long-term debt comprises the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Senior term loan
|
|
$
|
21,127
|
|
|
|
33,684
|
|
Export prepayment financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22,371
|
|
|
|
52,925
|
|
Less current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(9,641
|
)
|
|
|
(16,561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
12,730
|
|
|
|
36,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Loan The Companys
subsidiary, GMI, entered into a five-year senior term loan in an
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 during September 2008.
Interest on the senior term loan accrues at LIBOR plus an
applicable margin percentage or, at the Companys option,
prime plus an applicable margin percentage. Principal payments
are due in quarterly installments of $2,105, commencing on
December 31, 2008, and the unpaid principal balance is due
in full in September 2013, subject to certain mandatory
prepayments. A mandatory prepayment of $2,347 was made during
the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 based on excess cash
flow, as defined in the loan agreement, generated during fiscal
year 2009. As part of the Dow Corning transactions discussed in
note 3, the Company made a $6,000 prepayment of the senior
term loan, applied to the scheduled installments of principal in
inverse order of maturity, in exchange for the release of the
assets of West Virginia Alloys as security for the senior term
loan. The interest rate on this loan was 2.48%, equal to LIBOR
plus 2.25%, at December 31, 2009. The senior term loan is
secured by substantially all of the assets of GMI and is subject
to certain restrictive and financial covenants, which include
limits on additional debt, restrictions on capital expenditures,
restrictions on dividend and other equity distributions, a
maximum ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and
15
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
amortization, and minimum net worth and interest coverage
requirements. The Company was in compliance with these loan
covenants at December 31, 2009.
Export Prepayment Financing The export
prepayment financing was related to Globe Metais, which was sold
in November 2009 as discussed in note 3.
See note 10 (Derivative Instruments) for discussion of
derivative financial instruments entered into to reduce the
Companys exposure to interest rate fluctuations on
outstanding long-term debt.
The recorded carrying values of our debt balances approximate
fair value given our debt is at variable rates tied to market
indicators or is short-term in nature.
|
|
(10)
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
The Company enters into derivative instruments to hedge certain
interest rate risks and previously entered into derivative
instruments to hedge certain foreign currency risks. The Company
does not engage in interest rate, currency, or commodity
speculation, and no derivatives are held for trading purposes.
All derivatives are accounted for using
mark-to-market
accounting. The Company believes it is not practical to
designate its derivative instruments as hedging instruments as
defined under ASC Subtopic
815-10,
Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815). Accordingly, the
Company adjusts its derivative financial instruments to current
market value through the condensed consolidated statements of
operations based on the fair value of the agreement as of
period-end. Although not designated as hedged items as defined
under ASC 815, these derivative instruments serve to
significantly offset the Companys interest rate risks and
served to significantly offset foreign exchange risks associated
with Globe Metais prior to its sale discussed in note 3.
Gains or losses from these transactions offset gains or losses
on the assets, liabilities, or transactions being hedged. No
credit loss is anticipated as the counterparties to these
agreements are major financial institutions that are highly
rated.
Interest
Rate Risk:
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest
rates on certain of its long-term debt obligations.
In connection with GMIs revolving credit facility and
senior term loan (note 9), the Company entered into an
interest rate cap arrangement and three interest rate swap
agreements to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.
In October 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate cap
arrangement to cap LIBOR on a $20,000 notional amount of debt,
with the notional amount decreasing by $1,053 per quarter
through the interest rate caps expiration on June 30,
2013. Under the interest rate cap, the Company capped LIBOR at a
maximum of 4.5% over the life of the agreement.
In November 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap
agreement involving the exchange of interest obligations
relating to a $13,333 notional amount of debt, with the notional
amount decreasing by $702 per quarter. Under the interest rate
swap, the Company receives LIBOR in exchange for a fixed
interest rate of 2.85% over the life of the agreement. The
agreement expires in June 2013.
In January 2009, the Company entered into a second interest rate
swap agreement involving the exchange of interest obligations
relating to a $12,632 notional amount of debt, with the notional
amount decreasing by $702 per
16
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
quarter. Under the interest rate swap, the Company receives
LIBOR in exchange for a fixed interest rate of 1.66% over the
life of the agreement. The agreement expires in June 2013.
In April 2009, the Company entered into a third interest rate
swap agreement involving the exchange of interest obligations
relating to an $11,228 notional amount of debt, with the
notional amount decreasing by $702 per quarter. Under the
interest rate swap, the Company receives LIBOR in exchange for a
fixed interest rate of 2.05% over the life of the agreement. The
agreement expires in June 2013.
The remaining notional amount of debt swapped under these three
interest rate swaps totals $29,474 at December 31, 2009.
Based on total prepayments of $8,347 made on GMIs senior
term loan in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 (see
note 9), the total remaining balance outstanding on
GMIs senior term loan is only $21,127 at December 31,
2009.
In connection with the Companys export prepayment
financing arrangement (note 9), the Company entered into an
interest rate swap agreement involving the exchange of interest
obligations relating to a $14,000 notional amount of debt, with
the notional amount decreasing by $3,000 on a semiannual basis
through August 2011, and a final $2,000 notional amount swapped
for the six-month period ended January 2012. Under the interest
rate swap, the Company received LIBOR in exchange for a fixed
interest rate of 2.66% over the life of the agreement. This
agreement, as well as the related export prepayment financing
arrangement, was transferred with the sale of Globe Metais
discussed in note 3.
Foreign
Currency Risk:
The Company is exposed to market risk arising from changes in
currency exchange rates as a result of its operations outside
the United States, principally in Argentina and China. A portion
of the Companys net sales generated from its
non-U.S. operations
is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.
Most of the Companys operating costs for its
non-U.S. operations
are denominated in local currencies, principally the Argentine
peso and the Chinese renminbi. Consequently, the translated
U.S. dollar value of the Companys
non-U.S. dollar
net sales, and related accounts receivable balances, and our
operating costs are subject to currency exchange rate
fluctuations. Derivative instruments are not used extensively to
manage this risk. The Company utilized derivative financial
instruments to manage a portion of its net foreign currency
exposure to the Brazilian real. All of these contracts were
settled prior to the sale of Globe Metais discussed in
note 3.
Commodity
Price Risk:
The Company is exposed to price risk for certain raw materials
and energy used in its production process. The raw materials and
energy that the Company uses are largely commodities subject to
price volatility caused by changes in global supply and demand
and governmental controls. Derivative financial instruments are
not used to manage the Companys exposure to fluctuations
in the cost of commodity products used in its operations. The
Company attempts to reduce the impact of increases in its raw
material and energy costs by negotiating long-term contracts and
through the acquisition of companies or assets for the purpose
of increasing its access to raw materials with favorable pricing
terms.
17
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
The effect of the Companys derivative instruments on the
condensed consolidated statements of operations is summarized in
the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Gain Recognized
|
|
(Loss) Gain Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
During the Three Months
|
|
During the Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
Location
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
of (Loss) Gain
|
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
$
|
(267
|
)
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
(827
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
The fair values of the Companys derivative instruments at
December 31, 2009 are summarized in note 17 (Fair
Value Measures). The $267 liability associated with the
Companys interest rate derivatives is included in other
long-term liabilities.
The components of net periodic pension expense for the
Companys defined benefit pension plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(618
|
)
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension expense
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company expects to contribute approximately $756 to the
plans for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, of which
$299 has been contributed through December 31, 2009.
The following table summarizes our provision for (benefit from)
income taxes and effective tax rates for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
$
|
30,500
|
|
|
|
(65,584
|
)
|
|
|
44,052
|
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
12,568
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
17,951
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.7
|
%
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)%
|
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes is based on the
current estimate of the annual effective tax rate, adjusted as
necessary for quarterly events. In accordance with ASC Topic
740, Income Taxes, the Companys quarterly effective
tax rate does not reflect a benefit associated with losses
related to certain foreign subsidiaries. The effective tax rates
for the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 were based on our forecasted annualized effective tax
rates, adjusted for discrete items that occurred within the
respective periods.
The Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 was 41.2% compared to a benefit of 3.5%
for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The
Companys effective tax rate for the six months
18
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
ended December 31, 2009 was 40.7% compared to (15.8)% for
the six months ended December 31, 2008. These rates differ
from the Companys statutory rate of 35% mainly as a result
of increases to the effective tax rate from U.S. state tax
expense, the exclusion of the impact of net losses from our
Chinese operations, the tax benefit of which is not considered
more likely than not to be realized due to a history of
operating losses. In addition, the Company paid income taxes
totaling $9,395 during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 in
connection with the gain on the sale of Globe Metais discussed
in note 3. These increases are offset by the benefit from a
tax holiday in Argentina, which is forecasted to be lower in
fiscal year 2010 compared with fiscal year 2009, and the benefit
from a tax holiday in Brazil for the period that we owned Globe
Metais. Our effective tax rate for the three and six months
ended December 31, 2008 differs from the Companys
statutory rate primarily as a result of the Solsil goodwill
impairment charge of $57,512 recorded in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009, which was not deductible for tax purposes.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company recorded a
provision for income taxes of $28,827 as reduction of additional
paid-in capital in connection with the sale of the
noncontrolling interest in WVA LLC discussed in note 3.
The Company currently operates under a tax holiday in Argentina
and operated under a tax holiday in Brazil prior to the sale of
Globe Metais. In Argentina, the Companys manufacturing
income is taxed at a preferential rate, which varies based on
production levels from the Companys Argentine facilities,
compared to a statutory rate of 35%. The tax holiday in
Argentina expires in 2012. In Brazil, the Company operated under
a tax holiday, which resulted in a preferential tax rate of
15.25% of the Companys manufacturing income as compared to
a statutory rate of 34%. The anticipated effects of these tax
holidays are incorporated into the Companys annualized
effective tax rate as noted above. For the three and six months
ended December 31, 2009, the foreign tax holidays in
Argentina and Brazil provided a benefit of $5 and $457,
respectively to net income. For the three and six months ended
December 31, 2008, the foreign tax holidays in Argentina
and Brazil provided a benefit of $340 and $1,171, respectively
to net loss.
The Company maintains valuation allowances where it is more
likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset
will not be realized. In determining whether a valuation
allowance is warranted, the Company evaluates factors such as
prior earnings history, expected future earnings, carry back and
carry forward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially
enhance the likelihood of the realization of a deferred tax
asset. During the six months ended December 31, 2009, the
Companys net valuation allowances increased due to the
establishment of additional valuation allowances against net
operating losses (NOLs) in China that may not be utilized and
changes related to foreign exchange fluctuations associated with
our foreign NOLs, and decreased due to the sale of Globe Metais.
|
|
(13)
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company is subject to various lawsuits, claims, and
proceedings that arise in the normal course of business,
including employment, commercial, environmental, safety, and
health matters, as well as claims associated with our historical
acquisitions and divestitures. Although it is not presently
possible to determine the outcome of these matters, in the
opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters
will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or
liquidity.
|
|
b.
|
Environmental
Contingencies
|
It is the Companys policy to accrue for costs associated
with environmental assessments, remedial efforts, or other
environmental liabilities when it becomes probable that a
liability has been incurred and the costs can be
19
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
reasonably estimated. When a liability for environmental
remediation is recorded, such amounts will be recorded without
giving effect to any possible future recoveries. At
December 31, 2009, there are no significant liabilities
recorded for environmental contingencies. With respect to the
cost for ongoing environmental compliance, including maintenance
and monitoring, such costs are expensed as incurred unless there
is a long-term monitoring agreement with a governmental agency,
in which case a liability is established at the inception of the
agreement.
As of December 31, 2009, there are 39 employees that
are covered by a union agreement in the United States expiring
within one year.
On May 20, 2008, Empire State Development and New York
Power Authority announced that hydropower from the Niagara Power
Project would be supplied to the Company, which enabled it to
reopen and expand its previously idle manufacturing facility in
Niagara Falls, New York. On January 30, 2009, the Company
entered into a commodity purchase agreement with New York Power
Authority and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation where the Company
is supplied up to a maximum of 40,000 kW of hydropower from the
Niagara Power Project to operate its Niagara Falls facility. The
hydropower is supplied at preferential power rates plus
market-based delivery charges for a period of up to
5 years. Under the terms of the contract, the Company has
committed to a $60,000 capital expansion program and specified
employment levels, which, if not met, could reduce the
Companys power allocation from the Niagara Power Project.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company has spent
approximately $28,000 related to the capital expansion of our
Niagara Falls facility.
|
|
e.
|
Joint
Development Supply Agreement
|
On April 24, 2008, the Companys subsidiaries, Solsil
and GMI, entered into a joint development supply agreement with
BP Solar International Inc. (BP Solar) for the sale of solar
grade silicon. BP Solar and Solsil will also deploy certain
existing BP Solar technology at Solsils facility and the
two entities will jointly develop new technology to enhance
Solsils proprietary upgraded solar silicon metallurgical
process. Solsil and BP Solar will both contribute towards the
cost of the technology development. As part of this agreement,
BP Solar paid Solsil $10,000 as an advance for research and
development services and facilities construction. This amount
would be refundable to BP Solar if the Company cancels,
terminates, or fails to perform under certain terms of the
agreement, including lack of performance of research and
development services or facilities construction. Revenue
associated with facilities construction will be deferred until
specified contract milestones have been achieved, less any
penalties resulting from construction delays. Revenue associated
with research and development services will be deferred until
these services are successful in reducing manufacturing costs
and then recognized ratably as product is delivered to BP Solar.
If research and development services are performed, but are
unsuccessful, revenue will be deferred until contract expiration
and then recognized. No revenue associated with this agreement
has been recognized in earnings as of December 31, 2009 in
accordance with ASC 605.25.
In January 2009, the Company entered into a warehousing
arrangement with a customer whereby we agreed to deliver and
store uncrushed silicon metal based on the customers
purchase instructions. The customer is required to pay for
delivered material within 30 days from the date the
material is placed in our warehouse. Further, the customer is
required to pay a monthly storage fee based on the quantity
stored. As the transactions do not meet the revenue recognition
criteria contained in SAB 104 given the Company has
remaining, specific performance obligations such that the
earnings process is not complete, no revenue will be recognized
for silicon metal stored under this warehousing arrangement.
Revenue is recognized when the remaining, specific performance
obligations
20
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
have been performed and delivery has occurred. As of
December 31, 2009, all material previously stored under the
warehousing arrangement was delivered to the customer and all
remaining performance obligations were met. Accordingly, no
liability is recorded for deferred revenue under this agreement
at December 31, 2009.
|
|
(14)
|
Stockholders
Equity
|
In August 2009, the Company closed on an initial public offering
on the NASDAQ Global Select Market of 16,100,000 shares of
its common stock at $7.00 per share. Of the shares offered,
5,600,000 new shares were offered by the Company and 10,500,000
existing shares were offered by selling stockholders (which
included 2,100,000 shares sold by the selling stockholders
pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option). Total proceeds of the offering were
$112,700, of which the selling stockholders received $68,355,
net of underwriting discounts and commissions totaling $5,145,
and the Company received $36,456, net of underwriting discounts
and commissions totaling $2,744. In addition, the Company also
recognized offering costs of $1,688.
In connection with the Companys initial public offering on
the AIM market of the London Stock Exchange on October 3,
2005, the Company sold 33,500,000 units, consisting of one
share of the Companys common stock and two redeemable
common stock purchase warrants. Also in connection with this
initial public offering, the Company issued an option to
purchase 1,675,000 units (individually, UPO) at an exercise
price of $7.50 per UPO. Each UPO consists of one share of the
Companys common stock and two redeemable common stock
purchase warrants. All of the Companys warrants had an
exercise price of $5.00 per common share and were scheduled to
expire on October 3, 2009.
Prior to the expiration date, the Company received exercise
notifications from the holders of substantially all of the
outstanding warrants and UPOs. The holders of the UPOs
exercising their UPOs also immediately exercised the warrants
issuable upon the exercise of their UPOs. As a result of all of
these exercises, the Company issued 1,775,933 shares of
common stock to the former holders of the warrants and UPOs, and
no warrants or UPOs remain outstanding at December 31,
2009. The Company received $1,497 in cash with respect to these
exercises, and the remainder of the shares were issued on a net,
cashless basis. The sales and issuances of shares pursuant to
the warrant and UPO exercises were deemed to be exempt from
registration under the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of
Section 4(2) pertaining to private offers and sales or
Regulation S pertaining to foreign offers and sales.
|
|
c.
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
On November 28, 2008, the Company entered into a
subscription agreement for capital increase associated with its
ownership interest in Yonvey. Under the terms of this agreement,
the Company agreed to contribute an additional $10,236 in
specified installments in exchange for an additional 12%
interest in Yonvey. The Company has remitted the entire balance
of the capital increase. The subscription agreement provides a
call option such that within a period of three years from the
agreements effective date, the minority shareholder may
repurchase up to a maximum 12% ownership interest in Yonvey at a
price equal to the relevant percentage of the additional $10,236
registered capital plus a premium calculated using a specified
interest rate. In connection with our adoption of ASC 810.10 and
ASC 815.40, as Yonvey is a substantive entity, the subscription
agreement does not have any contingent exercise provisions, and
the settlement amount is tied to the fair value of the Yonvey
equity, the call option is considered an equity instrument. As
such, the Company reclassified the fair value of the call option
liability at June 30, 2009 of $1,072 from other long-term
liabilities to noncontrolling interest in stockholders
equity.
21
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
As discussed in note 3, the Company recorded an increase in
noncontrolling interest of $27,499 in association with the sale
of a 49% membership interest in WVA LLC on November 5, 2009.
|
|
(15)
|
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share are calculated based on
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share assumes
the exercise of stock options, the conversion of warrants, and
the exercise of UPOs, provided in each case the effect is
dilutive.
The reconciliation of the amounts used to compute basic and
diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share computation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Globe Specialty Metals,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
18,534
|
|
|
|
(61,521
|
)
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
(44,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
74,313,832
|
|
|
|
63,454,560
|
|
|
|
72,709,826
|
|
|
|
63,295,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(0.97
|
)
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share computation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Globe Specialty Metals,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
18,534
|
|
|
|
(61,521
|
)
|
|
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
(44,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
74,313,832
|
|
|
|
63,454,560
|
|
|
|
72,709,826
|
|
|
|
63,295,966
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
840,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,134,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
75,154,205
|
|
|
|
63,454,560
|
|
|
|
73,843,963
|
|
|
|
63,295,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
(0.97
|
)
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following potential common shares were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per common share because
their effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
877,001
|
|
|
|
1,873,000
|
|
|
|
877,001
|
|
|
|
1,873,000
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,365,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,365,747
|
|
UPOs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,325,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,325,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
877,001
|
|
|
|
22,564,161
|
|
|
|
877,001
|
|
|
|
22,564,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
(16)
|
Share-Based
Compensation
|
The Companys share-based compensation program consists of
the Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. 2006 Employee, Director and
Consultant Stock Plan (the Stock Plan), which was approved by
the Companys stockholders on November 10, 2006. The
Stock Plan provides for the issuance of a maximum of
5,000,000 shares of common stock for the granting of
incentive stock options, nonqualified options, stock grants, and
share-based awards. Any remaining shares available for grant,
but not yet granted, will be carried over and used in the
following fiscal years. During the six months ended
December 31, 2009, share-based compensation awards were
limited to the issuance of nonqualified stock options.
At December 31, 2009, there were 685,000 shares
available for grant. 3,505,000 outstanding incentive stock
options vest and become exercisable in equal one-quarter
increments every six months from the date of grant or date of
modification. 810,000 option grants vest and become exercisable
in equal one-third increments on the first, second, and third
anniversaries of the date of grant. All option grants have
maximum contractual terms ranging from 5 to 10 years.
A summary of the changes in options outstanding under the Stock
Plan during the six months ended December 31, 2009 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Term in Years
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
4,315,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.12
|
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
|
$
|
5,095
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,315,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
|
$
|
20,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,606,249
|
|
|
$
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
4.13
|
|
|
$
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended December 31, 2009, 1,076,250
options vested, resulting in total vested options of 1,606,249.
There are 2,708,751 nonvested options outstanding with a grant
date fair value, as modified, of $1.63. The weighted average per
share fair value of stock option grants at December 31,
2009 is $4.13.
For the three and six months ended December 31, 2009,
share-based compensation expense was $1,476 ($797 after tax) and
$3,231 ($1,743 after tax), respectively. For the three and six
months ended December 31, 2008, share-based compensation
expense was $791 ($430 after tax) and $3,196 ($1,725 after tax),
respectively. The expense is reported within selling, general,
and administrative expenses.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company has unearned
compensation expense of $6,496, before income taxes, related to
nonvested stock option awards. The unrecognized compensation
expense is expected to be recognized over the following periods
ending on June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Share-based compensation (pretax)
|
|
$
|
2,383
|
|
|
|
4,034
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is the Companys policy to issue new shares to satisfy
the requirements of its share-based compensation plan. The
Company does not expect to repurchase shares in the future to
support its share-based compensation plan.
23
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company completed its adoption
of ASC Subtopic 820, which establishes a fair value hierarchy
for disclosure of fair value measurements. The fair value
framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities
into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to
value the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most
reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally
requires significant management judgment. The three levels are
defined as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs reflecting
managements own assumptions about the inputs used in
pricing the asset or liability. For example, cash flow modeling
using inputs based on managements assumptions.
The Company does not have any assets that are required to be
remeasured at fair value at December 31, 2009. The
following table summarizes liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Interest rate derivatives
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities relate to the interest rate cap and
interest rate swap agreements summarized in note 10
(Derivative Instruments). Fair values are determined by
independent brokers using quantitative models based on readily
observable market data. See note 9 (Debt) for information
regarding the fair value of our outstanding debt.
In connection with our adoption of ASC 810.10 and ASC 815.40,
the Yonvey call option, previously included as a Level 3
liability, was reclassified to noncontrolling interest in
stockholders equity. See note 14 (Stockholders
Equity) for additional information.
|
|
(18)
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
From time to time, the Company enters into transactions in the
normal course of business with related parties. Management
believes that such transactions are at arms length and for
terms that would have been obtained from unaffiliated third
parties.
A current and a former member of the board of directors are
affiliated with Marco International and Marco Realty. During the
three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Company:
|
|
|
|
|
Paid Marco Realty $51 and $59 during the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $98 and $142
during the six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, to rent office space for its corporate
headquarters in New York City, New York.
|
|
|
|
Entered into agreements with Marco International to purchase
carbon electrodes. Marco International billed $1,361 and $0
during the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $3,023 and $0 during the six months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, under these
agreements.
|
|
|
|
Entered into an agreement to sell ferrosilicon to Marco
International. Net sales were $81 and $176 during the three
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$266 and $176 during the six months ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively, under this agreement.
|
24
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
Entered into agreements to purchase sodium carbonate from Marco
International. During the three months ended December 31,
2009 and 2008 purchases totaled $0 and $86, respectively. During
the six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 purchases
totaled $0 and $86, respectively.
|
The Company is affiliated with Norchem, Inc. (Norchem) through
its 50.0% equity interest. During the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company sold Norchem
product valued at $633 and $972, respectively. During the six
months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company sold
Norchem product valued at $1,266 and $2,115, respectively. At
December 31, 2009, receivables from Norchem totaled $278.
Certain entities of the D.E. Shaw group are stockholders of the
Company. The Company had outstanding financing arrangements
totaling $17,000 with certain entities of the D.E. Shaw group at
June 30, 2008. The notes were paid in full in September
2008. Interest expense on these financing arrangements totaled
$389 during the three and six months ended December 31,
2008.
Prior to our Yonvey business combination, Yonveys
predecessor had entered into a lending agreement with the
remaining minority stockholder. At December 31, 2009, $845
remained payable to Yonvey from this related party.
Operating segments are based upon the Companys management
reporting structure and include the following six reportable
segments:
|
|
|
|
|
GMI a manufacturer of silicon metal and
silicon-based alloys located in the United States.
|
|
|
|
Globe Metais a distributor of silicon metal
manufactured in Brazil. This segment includes the historical
Brazilian manufacturing operations, comprised of a manufacturing
plant in Breu Branco, mining operations, and forest reserves,
which were sold on November 5, 2009.
|
|
|
|
Globe Metales a manufacturer of silicon-based
alloys located in Argentina.
|
|
|
|
Solsil a manufacturer of upgraded
metallurgical grade silicon metal located in the United States.
|
|
|
|
Corporate general corporate expenses,
investments, and related investment income.
|
|
|
|
Other segments that do not fit into the above
reportable segments and are immaterial for purposes of separate
disclosure. The operating segments include Yonveys
electrode production operations and certain other distribution
operations for the sale of silicon metal and silicon-based
alloys.
|
Each of our reportable segments distributes its products in both
its country of domicile as well as to other international
customers. The following presents the Companys
consolidated net sales by product line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Silicon metal
|
|
$
|
74,184
|
|
|
|
72,816
|
|
|
|
143,586
|
|
|
|
157,876
|
|
Silicon-based alloys
|
|
|
30,340
|
|
|
|
39,658
|
|
|
|
59,906
|
|
|
|
92,597
|
|
Other, primarily by-products
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
10,244
|
|
|
|
17,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
108,278
|
|
|
|
119,307
|
|
|
|
213,736
|
|
|
|
268,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company began to allocate certain general corporate expenses
in fiscal year 2009. Segment results for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2008 have been updated to conform
to this reporting convention.
25
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
Summarized financial information for our reportable segments as
of, and for the three and six months ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, is shown in the following tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Before Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Before Income
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
GMI
|
|
$
|
76,514
|
|
|
|
9,062
|
|
|
|
8,792
|
|
|
|
78,925
|
|
|
|
15,522
|
|
|
|
14,760
|
|
Globe Metais
|
|
|
19,389
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|
27,167
|
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
Globe Metales
|
|
|
12,495
|
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
12,542
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
3,346
|
|
Solsil
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
(73,831
|
)
|
|
|
(73,716
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,873
|
|
|
|
18,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,872
|
)
|
|
|
(9,356
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
2,573
|
|
|
|
(1,404
|
)
|
|
|
(1,556
|
)
|
|
|
5,220
|
|
|
|
(3,077
|
)
|
|
|
(3,129
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(2,668
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(5,134
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
108,278
|
|
|
|
30,466
|
|
|
|
30,500
|
|
|
|
119,307
|
|
|
|
(62,161
|
)
|
|
|
(65,584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Before Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Before Income
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
GMI
|
|
$
|
147,375
|
|
|
|
21,927
|
|
|
|
21,097
|
|
|
|
248,020
|
|
|
|
174,895
|
|
|
|
39,122
|
|
|
|
37,846
|
|
Globe Metais
|
|
|
40,980
|
|
|
|
3,949
|
|
|
|
7,281
|
|
|
|
15,610
|
|
|
|
58,466
|
|
|
|
11,469
|
|
|
|
6,474
|
|
Globe Metales
|
|
|
23,523
|
|
|
|
6,234
|
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
|
|
68,596
|
|
|
|
32,638
|
|
|
|
11,221
|
|
|
|
10,826
|
|
Solsil
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
(921
|
)
|
|
|
26,087
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
(77,729
|
)
|
|
|
(77,569
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,870
|
|
|
|
13,473
|
|
|
|
447,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,350
|
)
|
|
|
(13,053
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
5,623
|
|
|
|
(2,651
|
)
|
|
|
(2,736
|
)
|
|
|
42,871
|
|
|
|
11,398
|
|
|
|
(3,102
|
)
|
|
|
(3,429
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(3,785
|
)
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
(241,113
|
)
|
|
|
(10,938
|
)
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
213,736
|
|
|
|
42,792
|
|
|
|
44,052
|
|
|
|
607,155
|
|
|
|
268,464
|
|
|
|
(34,767
|
)
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accounting policies of our operating segments are the same
as those disclosed in note 2 (Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies) to our June 30, 2009 financial
statements. We evaluate segment performance principally based on
operating income (loss). Intersegment net sales are not material.
26
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
Net sales are attributed to geographic regions based upon the
location of the selling unit. Net sales by geographic region for
the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
92,020
|
|
|
|
93,865
|
|
|
|
175,403
|
|
|
|
204,038
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
10,087
|
|
|
|
10,199
|
|
|
|
20,210
|
|
|
|
27,120
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
12,486
|
|
|
|
12,820
|
|
|
|
30,667
|
|
China
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
Poland
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
4,879
|
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
108,278
|
|
|
|
119,307
|
|
|
|
213,736
|
|
|
|
268,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets by geographical region at December 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
180,484
|
|
|
|
180,392
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
31,821
|
|
|
|
32,515
|
|
Brazil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,760
|
|
China
|
|
|
27,992
|
|
|
|
27,060
|
|
Poland
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
241,116
|
|
|
|
270,566
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant, and equipment, net
of accumulated depreciation and amortization, and goodwill and
other intangible assets.
The following is a summary of the Companys major customers
and their respective percentages of consolidated net sales for
the three and six months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Dow Corning
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Wacker Chemie AG
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
All other customers
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
GLOBE
SPECIALTY METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(UNAUDITED)
The Company currently has one contract with Dow Corning. The
agreement is a four year arrangement in which Dow Corning was to
purchase 30,000 metric tons of silicon metal per calendar year
through December 31, 2010. This contract was amended in
November 2008 to provide for the sale of an additional 17,000
metric tons of silicon metal to be purchased in calendar year
2009. The contract was further amended in connection with the
Dow Corning transactions discussed in note 3 to reduce the
amount required to be sold in calendar year 2010 to 20,000
metric tons of silicon metal. Under a prior arrangement,
effective December 1, 2007 through January 31, 2009,
the Company supplied Dow Corning 13,000 metrics tons of silicon
metal.
We evaluated subsequent events through February 16, 2010,
the date the financial statements were issued, and determined
there have been no events that have occurred that would require
adjustments to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
28
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements as that term is
used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Certain statements made in this quarterly report involve risks
and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements reflect the
Companys best judgment based on our current expectations,
assumptions, estimates and projections about us and our
industry, and although we base these statements on circumstances
that we believe to be reasonable when made, there can be no
assurance that future events will not affect the accuracy of
such forward-looking information. As such, the forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual
results may vary materially from the results and expectations
discussed in this report. Factors that might cause the
Companys actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated in forward-looking statements are more fully
described in the Risk Factors sections contained in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and in this
Quarterly Report. The following discussion should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this
report, as well as the more detailed information in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
Introduction
Globe Specialty Metals, together with its subsidiaries
(collectively, we, our, GSM
or the Company) is one of the leading manufacturers
of silicon metal and silicon-based alloys. As of
December 31, 2009, we owned and operated seven
manufacturing facilities, principally in three primary operating
segments: GMI, our U.S. operations; Globe Metais, our
Brazilian operations, the manufacturing component of which was
sold on November 5, 2009; and, Globe Metales, our Argentine
operations.
Business
Segments
We operate in six reportable segments:
|
|
|
|
|
GMI a manufacturer of silicon metal and
silicon-based alloys located in the United States with plants in
Beverly, Ohio, Alloy, West Virginia, Niagara Falls, New York and
Selma, Alabama and a quartzite mine in Billingsley, Alabama;
|
|
|
|
Globe Metais a distributor of silicon metal
manufactured in Brazil. This segment includes the historical
Brazilian manufacturing operations, comprised of a manufacturing
plant in Breu Branco, mining operations and forest reserves
which were sold on November 5, 2009;
|
|
|
|
Globe Metales a manufacturer of silicon-based
alloys located in Argentina with a silicon-based alloys plant in
Mendoza and a cored-wire fabrication facility in San Luis;
|
|
|
|
Solsil a developer and manufacturer of
upgraded metallurgical grade silicon metal located in the United
States with operations in Beverly, Ohio;
|
|
|
|
Corporate a corporate office including
general expenses, investments, and related investment
income; and
|
|
|
|
Other includes an electrode production
operation in China and a cored-wire production facility located
in Poland. These segments do not fit into the above reportable
segments, and are immaterial for purposes of separate disclosure.
|
Overview
and Recent Developments
We achieved several major milestones in the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, which positioned the Company for
continued profitable growth. On November 5, 2009, we closed
two transactions with Dow Corning Corporation (Dow Corning),
which provided us with approximately $135,000,000 of net
proceeds that we intend to use to fund future acquisitions.
During the quarter we also reopened our Niagara Falls, New York
plant, which was out of service for more than five years, and we
began the process of reopening our Selma, Alabama plant, which
had been idle since April 2009 and that we expect will be at
full operating capacity by the end of February 2010. The
29
additional capacity that will be provided by the Niagara Falls
and Selma plants will allow us to meet increasing customer
demand and should enable us to increase profitability.
On November 5, 2009, we sold our Brazilian manufacturing
operations (Globe Metais) to Dow Corning for net proceeds of
approximately $65,600,000. We acquired these manufacturing
operations in January 2007 and had three successful years of
profitability. However, in the second half of calendar year
2009, operating costs had risen significantly as a result of the
weakening U.S. dollar and higher local power rates, and we
expected these unfavorable trends to continue. The sale of the
manufacturing operations eliminated the risk of declining future
profits in Brazil and provided capital to continue our growth
strategy. The current quarter results include a net gain of
approximately $23,400,000 from this transaction, which is
subject to final purchase price adjustments. We retained certain
export customers from the Brazilian operations, and for calendar
year 2010, we will be buying material from Dow Corning for sale
to these export customers. We expect to supply these customers
with product from our domestic plants in subsequent periods.
On November 5, 2009, we also entered into a manufacturing
joint venture with Dow Corning at our Alloy, West Virginia
plant, which generated net proceeds for the Company of
approximately $70,000,000. Under this joint venture agreement,
Dow Corning acquired a 49% equity interest in WVA Manufacturing
LLC, the entity that owns the Companys Alloy plant. This
interest entitles Dow Corning to receive 49% of the plants
production at cost. The tonnage that Dow Corning will receive
under the joint venture agreement is approximately equal to the
volume they received under the existing long-term supply
agreement, which was set to expire at the end of calendar year
2010. By entering into this joint venture agreement, we
effectively monetized the existing long-term supply agreement
with Dow Corning and secured a permanent commitment for
production for the plant. The Alloy plant is our largest
production facility and achieves significant cost benefits when
consistently operating at full capacity. Locking in the joint
venture volume increases the likelihood of operating the plant
at full capacity.
We reopened our Niagara Falls plant during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, which added 30,000 MT to our silicon
metal capacity. The plant had been closed for more than five
years and required approximately $28,000,000 of capital
expenditures over the last 18 months to reopen. We secured
a long-term power contract from the New York Power Authority to
support the operation. During the quarter, we incurred a pre-tax
loss of approximately $1,400,000 as the plant was being
restarted. Going forward, we expect the plant to contribute
positive earnings to the Company.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2009, we began the
process of reopening our Selma, Alabama plant. We idled the
plant in April 2009 as a result of the global economic
recession. We successfully renegotiated the power rate to be
comparable with our other domestic plants, which will reduce the
cost of production at the plant and make it more competitive
with our other domestic plants. Selma will add 25,000 MT to our
silicon metal production capacity and we expect the plant to be
at full capacity by the end of February 2010. During the current
quarter, we incurred a pre-tax loss of approximately $2,500,000
for costs associated with restarting the plant. Going forward,
we expect the plant to contribute positive earnings to the
Company.
Net sales for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 increased
approximately $2,800,000, or 3%, from the preceding quarter
ended September 30, 2009, despite a decline in sales of
approximately $2,200,000 from Brazil as a result of the sale of
Globe Metais to Dow Corning and a decline of approximately
$2,500,000 in sales as a result of the Alloy joint venture,
which is approximately the difference between providing material
at cost under the joint venture agreement and the price material
could have been sold at current market prices. The average
selling price of silicon metal decreased by 3% in the quarter
primarily as a result of the Alloy joint venture, which provided
Dow Corning with 49% of the Alloy plants output at cost.
The average price of silicon-based alloys decreased by 8% in the
quarter as a result of a higher concentration of lower-price
ferrosilicon sales and lower calcium silicon prices. Tons
shipped during the quarter increased 11% as customer demand
continues to accelerate. Net sales were only approximately
$11,000,000 below the same quarter in the prior year primarily
due to a decline in sales of approximately $7,800,000 from
Brazil.
Income before taxes totaled approximately $30,500,000 in the
quarter, but included a gain on sale of Brazil of approximately
$23,400,000 and
start-up
costs described above of approximately $3,900,000. This compares
to income before taxes in the preceding quarter ended
September 30, 2009 of approximately $13,600,000 and a loss
of approximately $65,600,000, including an impairment charge of
approximately $69,600,000, in the same quarter in the prior
year. The quarter ended December 31, 2009 also included
approximately a $700,000 charge for impairment of certain
furnaces at our Yonvey electrode plant.
30
Outlook
Demand for our products continues to increase as customers
experience continued end market growth. In particular, the
silicones industry appears to have returned to 2008 demand
levels and resumed its historic growth rate. We also see demand
increases from the aluminum industry as auto production rises
and from polysilicon makers as the solar industry continues to
grow. As demand continues to improve, the spot price for silicon
metal has risen, a trend which we anticipate to continue.
We expect sales volumes to continue to increase in calendar year
2010 as output from our newly reopened Niagara Falls and Selma
plants more than make up for the lost volume from the sale of
our Brazilian manufacturing operations. Niagara Falls and Selma
have a combined 55,000 MT capacity of silicon metal. We expect
the profitability of Niagara Falls and Selma to eventually
exceed the profits historically earned in Brazil. In addition,
we retained Brazilian export contracts, which should account for
approximately $40,000,000 of annual sales. During calendar year
2010, we are obligated to purchase the material to fulfill these
contracts from Dow Corning in Brazil, and we expect to earn only
a modest gross margin; however, beginning in January 2011, we
can source this material from our other plants at a lower cost.
In the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we expect our average
selling price of silicon metal to decline somewhat from the
quarter ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the
following: the formation of the Alloy joint venture, which will
sell approximately 33,000 MT of material annually to Dow Corning
at cost; the execution of the final year of a 20,000 MT contract
priced below current market; the carry-over from calendar year
2009 to the first quarter of calendar year 2010 of certain
volumes from the Dow Corning contract priced below current
market; and the expiration of certain calendar year 2009 annual
contracts priced above current market. As customer demand
increases, we would expect to see a continuing rise in spot
prices for silicon metal through calendar year 2010. This should
provide us with an opportunity to increase our average selling
price by selling the approximately one-third of our silicon
metal production capacity for calendar year 2010 that is not
presently committed to customers under sales contracts at higher
prices. Our average selling price of silicon-based alloys is
expected to remain relatively constant in the quarter ended
March 31, 2010.
As a result of the expected decline in average selling price,
partially offset by higher sales volumes, we anticipate a modest
decline in earnings in the quarter ended March 31, 2010
from the quarter ended December 31, 2009, after adjustment
for the gain on sale of our Brazilian manufacturing operations
and Niagara Falls and Alloy plant start-up costs. Earnings are
then expected to rise in future quarters as we expect to benefit
from increased capacity from the Selma and Niagara Falls plants
and expected increases in spot silicon metal prices. At the
beginning of calendar year 2011, after the below-market 20,000
MT contract expires and our calendar year 2010 annual contracts
re-price, we should see a significant increase in our silicon
metal average selling price, which would directly improve
earnings.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (U.S. GAAP). The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. Management bases our estimates and
judgments on historical experience and other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results may differ from the estimates used under different
assumptions or conditions. We have provided a description of
significant accounting policies in the notes to our condensed
consolidated financial statements and our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Our critical
accounting policies have not significantly changed from those
discussed in Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and
31
Results of Operations Critical Accounting
Policies of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, except as follows:
Income
Taxes
In determining our quarterly provision for income taxes, we use
an estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on our
expected annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning
opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in
which we operate. Subsequent recognition, derecognition and
measurement of a tax position taken in a previous period are
separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur.
Results
of Operations
GSM
Three Months Ended December 31, 2009 vs. 2008
Consolidated
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
108,278
|
|
|
|
119,307
|
|
|
|
(11,029
|
)
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
87,974
|
|
|
|
91,957
|
|
|
|
(3,983
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,142
|
|
|
|
19,668
|
|
|
|
(6,526
|
)
|
|
|
(33.2
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(72.8
|
)%
|
Gain on sale of Globe Metais
|
|
|
(23,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,368
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
|
|
(69,560
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
30,466
|
|
|
|
(62,161
|
)
|
|
|
92,627
|
|
|
|
(149.0
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
|
(1,968
|
)
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
(47.4
|
)%
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
(1,455
|
)
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
|
(173.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
30,500
|
|
|
|
(65,584
|
)
|
|
|
96,084
|
|
|
|
(146.5
|
)%
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
12,568
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
14,896
|
|
|
|
(639.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
17,932
|
|
|
|
(63,256
|
)
|
|
|
81,188
|
|
|
|
(128.3
|
)%
|
Losses attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
1,735
|
|
|
|
(1,133
|
)
|
|
|
(65.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Globe Specialty Metals, Inc.
|
|
$
|
18,534
|
|
|
|
(61,521
|
)
|
|
|
80,055
|
|
|
|
(130.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
The following table presents consolidated operating results:
Net
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended Dec 31, 2009
|
|
|
Three Months Ended Dec 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
$ (in 000s)
|
|
|
MT
|
|
|
$/MT
|
|
|
$ (in 000s)
|
|
|
MT
|
|
|
$/MT
|
|
|
Silicon metal
|
|
$
|
74,184
|
|
|
|
28,759
|
|
|
$
|
2,580
|
|
|
$
|
72,816
|
|
|
|
28,674
|
|
|
$
|
2,539
|
|
Silicon-based alloys
|
|
|
30,340
|
|
|
|
15,749
|
|
|
|
1,926
|
|
|
|
39,658
|
|
|
|
15,605
|
|
|
|
2,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon metal and silicon-based alloys
|
|
|
104,524
|
|
|
|
44,508
|
|
|
|
2,348
|
|
|
|
112,474
|
|
|
|
44,279
|
|
|
|
2,540
|
|
Silica fume and other
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
108,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
119,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $11,029,000 from the prior year to
$108,278,000 primarily as a result of an 8% decline in our
average selling price while tons sold held nearly constant. The
decrease in average selling price, which represents sales of
$8,532,000, resulted from a 24% decline in silicon-based alloy
average pricing, offset by a 2% increase in silicon metal
pricing. This large decline in silicon-based alloy pricing was
due to lower customer demand from reduced steel production
driven by lower automobile production and construction spending,
price reductions to retain volume in the increasingly
competitive alloy market and a mix shift towards ferrosilicon,
which is our lowest priced alloy. The slight increase in tons
sold resulted in increased net sales of $582,000. Silica fume
and other revenue decreased by $3,079,000 as a result of a
decline in production levels and sales of by-products.
The GMI segment includes the Alloy joint venture, which was
entered into on November 5, 2009, and sells 49% of the
output of the Alloy plant to Dow Corning at cost. We control
the joint venture and consolidate its results in our financial
statements.
Cost of
Goods Sold:
The $3,983,000, or 4%, decrease in cost of goods sold was a
result of a 5% decline in our cost per ton sold. This decrease
was the result of several factors including the curtailment of
Solsil production, which lowered cost of goods sold by
$3,957,000 and tons sold by only 78, a mix shift within
silicon-based alloys, which lowered cost of goods sold by
approximately $4,300,000, and our overall cost reduction
programs. These cost decreases were partially offset by lower
capacity utilization during the quarter and
start-up
costs of $3,892,000 primarily at our Niagara Falls and Selma
plants.
Gross margin represented approximately 23% of net sales in the
second quarter of fiscal year 2009 and decreased to
approximately 19% of net sales in the second quarter of fiscal
year 2010 primarily as a result of lower silicon-based alloy
selling prices and the start-up costs at Niagara Falls and Selma.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses:
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of
$6,526,000 was primarily due to the write-off of $2,527,000 of
deferred offering costs in the second quarter of fiscal year
2009, caused by a more than 90 day delay in our initial
public offering, a decrease in bonus and accruals at Corporate
of $1,550,000, the timing of the sale of our Brazilian plant,
which resulted in a $1,100,000 expense reduction, a $500,000
decrease in bonuses at GMI, a decrease of approximately $592,000
at Yonvey due to lower audit related professional fees and
aggressive cost control efforts, and a $314,000 reduction in
audit and audit related support fees at Corporate. These
decreases were offset by an increase in share-based compensation
expense of $683,000.
Research
and Development:
The decrease in research and development expense of $206,000 was
primarily due to the suspension of production activities at
Solsil, which resulted in a decrease of $134,000.
33
Gain on
Sale of Globe Metais:
Gain on sale of Globe Metais recorded in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2010 was approximately $23,368,000 and was net of
transaction expense of $2,238,000. The gain was associated with
the sale of our Brazilian operations on November 5, 2009
for net cash proceeds of approximately $65,600,000, which
represented a purchase price of $75,000,000 less income taxes
and transaction expenses.
Goodwill
and Intangible Asset Impairment:
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment for the second quarter
of fiscal year 2009 was approximately $69,560,000 and was
associated with the Solsil business unit. The global economic
slowdown, combined with a decrease in oil prices, caused a sharp
decline in the product price and demand for upgraded
metallurgical grade silicon. As a result, it was determined that
the value of the Solsil business unit no longer supported its
goodwill and intangible asset balances.
Net
Interest Expense:
Net interest expense decreased by $932,000 due a lower average
debt balance at GMI, which resulted in a decrease in interest
expense of $551,000, and the timing of the sale of Globe Metais
on November 5, 2009, which resulted in a reduction in
interest expense of $305,000.
Other
Income (Loss):
Other income (loss) increased by $2,525,000 due to a
year-over-year
foreign exchange gain of $2,988,000 driven by currency hedges on
the Brazilian real, offset by a decrease of $218,000 of other
income related to royalties on the lease of certain property at
GMI. Globe Metais had a
year-over-year
gain of $3,706,000 primarily due to a gain associated with the
revaluation of long-term real denominated tax assets. Corporate
had a
year-over-year
loss of $664,000 related to real denominated liabilities.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
Provision for income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income was
approximately 41%, or $12,568,000, in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2010 and was a benefit of approximately 4%, or
$(2,328,000), in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. The
change in our tax provision was primarily due to the fact that
the goodwill impairment charge recorded in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009 arose from a non-taxable acquisition and no tax
benefit was obtained from the goodwill impairment. The increase
in the effective tax rate is also due to the payment of income
taxes totaling $9,395,000 in connection with the sale of Globe
Metais, the exclusion of the impact of net losses from our
Chinese operations, the tax benefit of which may not be realized
due to a history of operating losses, as well as a reduction in
the benefit from tax holidays in Argentina.
Segment
Operations
GMI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
76,514
|
|
|
|
78,925
|
|
|
|
(2,411
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
62,574
|
|
|
|
58,424
|
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
9,062
|
|
|
|
15,522
|
|
|
|
(6,460
|
)
|
|
|
(41.6
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Net sales decreased $2,411,000, or 3%, from the prior year to
$76,514,000. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 3%
decrease in average selling price partially offset by a 1%
increase in volume. Pricing for silicon metal was up 5%, due to
favorable annual contracts. Pricing for silicon-based alloys was
down 21% due to a shift in product mix towards ferrosilicon
coupled with reduced ferrosilicon pricing, which was a result of
reduced demand and aggressive imports. Silicon metal volumes
were up 13% due to increased customer demand and the timing of
the fulfillment of long-term contracts. Silicon-based alloy
volume was down 20% due to a decline in demand for magnesium
ferrosilicon, primarily from the automotive industry. Shipments
in the quarter include shipment of the final remaining material
held under a storage agreement, which led to the recognition of
approximately $9,000,000 of revenue previously shown on the
balance sheet as deferred revenue.
The GMI segment includes the Alloy joint venture, which was
entered into on November 5, 2009, and sells 49% of the
output of the Alloy plant to Dow Corning at cost. We control the
joint venture and consolidate its results in our financial
statements. As a result of the joint venture, GMIs total
sales and gross margin have been reduced by virtue of the
material sold to Dow Corning at cost. Silicon metal pricing was
down 4% from the immediately preceding quarter, largely due to
material supplied at cost under the joint venture agreement.
Operating income decreased by $6,460,000 from the prior year to
$9,062,000. This was primarily due to increased production costs
and lower average selling prices. Cost of goods sold increased
by 7% while volumes increased only by 1%. This increase in cost
per ton sold was due to reduced capacity utilization,
start-up
costs of $1,148,000 and $2,470,000 at Niagara Falls and Selma,
respectively, and higher electrode prices.
Globe
Metais
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
19,389
|
|
|
|
27,167
|
|
|
|
(7,778
|
)
|
|
|
(28.6
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
15,247
|
|
|
|
19,479
|
|
|
|
(4,232
|
)
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
(1,401
|
)
|
|
|
(59.9
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Gain on sale of Globe Metais
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
|
(3,360
|
)
|
|
|
(63.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $7,778,000, or 29%, from the prior year to
$19,389,000. The decrease was primarily attributable to the
timing of sale of Globe Metais on November 5, 2009, after
which we continued to fulfill only certain foreign customer
contracts. As a result, we experienced a 30% decrease in volumes
and a decrease in the sale of by-products of $1,122,000, offset
by a 5% increase in average selling prices. We experienced a
year over year increase in pricing due to the retention of
certain favorable annual contracts entered into at the end of
calendar year 2008.
Operating income decreased by $3,360,000 from the prior year to
$1,917,000. The decrease was primarily the result of expenses
associated with the sale of Globe Metais of $1,287,000, lower
sales volumes due to the timing of the sale, and increased
production costs associated with the appreciation of the real.
As a result, cost of goods sold decreased 22% while volumes
decreased 30%. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased by $1,401,000 primarily due to the timing of the sale
of the plant on November 5, 2009, which resulted in a cost
reduction of approximately $1,100,000.
On November 5, 2009, we sold our Brazilian manufacturing
operations to Dow Corning for net proceeds of approximately
$65,600,000. We acquired these manufacturing operations in
January 2007 and had three successful years of profitability.
However, in the second half of calendar year 2009, operating
costs had risen significantly as a result of the weakening U.S.
dollar and higher local power rates. The sale of the
manufacturing operations eliminated the risk of declining future
profits in Brazil and provided capital to continue our growth
strategy. The current quarter gain on sale of Globe Metais
reflects only transaction costs of $1,287,000 associated with
the sale of
35
our Brazilian manufacturing operations, as the gain on the sale
of the manufacturing operations is reported in the Corporate
operating segment. We retained certain export customers from the
Brazilian plant, which should account for approximately
$40,000,000 of annual sales. During calendar year 2010, we
are obligated to purchase the material to fulfill these
contracts from Dow Corning in Brazil, and we expect to earn only
a modest gross margin; however, beginning in January 2011, we
can source this material from our other plants at a lower cost.
Now that this operating segment has transitioned to a
distribution business, we expect to incur only modest selling,
general and administrative expenses as virtually all costs will
be included in cost of goods sold.
Globe
Metales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
12,495
|
|
|
|
12,542
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
8,942
|
|
|
|
7,824
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(20.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
3,686
|
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
(25.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $47,000 from the prior year to $12,495,000.
This slight decrease was the result of two significant
offsetting trends, a 41% decrease in average selling price and a
69% increase in volume. Pricing decreased due to the completion
of certain favorable long-term contracts and a change in product
mix, which included the sale of lower priced ferrosilicon
products, the price of which was affected by a reduction in
production across the steel industry. Volumes increased from the
higher shipments of standard grade ferrosilicon and magnesium
ferrosilicon as demand in the automotive end markets began to
recover.
Operating income decreased by $950,000 from the prior year to
$2,736,000. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in
average selling price only partially offset by lower productions
costs. Average selling prices decreased by 41% and cost per ton
decreased by 33%. This decrease in cost per ton sold was
primarily due to a change in product mix, which included the
production of lower cost ferrosilicon and aggressive cost
reductions. Power costs increased beginning in November 2009 as
our long-term power agreement expired. We are currently
negotiating a new contract, which we expect will be at a higher
rate than the expired contract, and are paying a month-to-month
rate until a new contract is completed.
Solsil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(104.3
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
(3,957
|
)
|
|
|
(92.0
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(44.7
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(63.5
|
)%
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
|
|
(69,560
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
(73,831
|
)
|
|
|
73,194
|
|
|
|
(99.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $612,000 from the prior year to $(25,000).
The decrease was primarily attributable to Solsil suspending
commercial production as a result of a significant decline in
the price of polysilicon and the decline in demand for upgraded
metallurgical grade silicon. As a result, we are concentrating
our efforts at Solsil on research and development activities.
Operating loss decreased by $73,194,000 from the prior year to
$637,000. The primary driver of the reduction was the
$69,560,000 impairment charge taken in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009. Also, cost of goods sold
36
decreased $3,957,000 from the prior year to $343,000 as a result
of Solsils suspension of commercial production and focus
on refining its production processes to enhance yield and reduce
the cost of production. As a result of these changes, selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased $155,000 and
research and development expenses decreased $134,000.
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
5,782
|
|
|
|
9,872
|
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(41.4
|
)%
|
Gain on sale of Globe Metais
|
|
|
(24,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,655
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
18,873
|
|
|
|
(9,872
|
)
|
|
|
28,745
|
|
|
|
(291.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income increased by $28,745,000 from the prior year to
$18,873,000. The increase was primarily due to the $24,655,000
gain on sale of Globe Metais recorded in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2010. The gain was associated with the sale of our
interest in Globe Metais on November 5, 2009 for net cash
proceeds of $65,600,000, which represented a purchase price of
$75,000,000 less income taxes and certain transaction expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$4,090,000 from the prior year to $5,782,000. This was primarily
due to the write-off of $2,527,000 of deferred offering costs in
the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 because our initial
public offering was postponed by more than 90 days, a
decrease in bonus and accruals of $1,550,000, and a $314,000
reduction in audit and audit related support fees. These
decreases were offset by an increase in share-based compensation
expense of $683,000.
Gain on sale of Globe Metais reflects the gain on the sale of
our Brazilian manufacturing operations, net of transaction costs
totaling $951,000 incurred by Corporate.
37
GSM
Six Months Ended December 31, 2009 vs. 2008
Consolidated
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
213,736
|
|
|
|
268,464
|
|
|
|
(54,728
|
)
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
167,952
|
|
|
|
199,095
|
|
|
|
(31,143
|
)
|
|
|
(15.6
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
25,865
|
|
|
|
33,700
|
|
|
|
(7,835
|
)
|
|
|
(23.2
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(86.9
|
)%
|
Gain on sale of Globe Metais
|
|
|
(22,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,907
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
|
|
(69,560
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
42,792
|
|
|
|
(34,767
|
)
|
|
|
77,559
|
|
|
|
(223.1
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(2,218
|
)
|
|
|
(3,616
|
)
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
(38.7
|
)%
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
(1,920
|
)
|
|
|
5,398
|
|
|
|
(281.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
44,052
|
|
|
|
(40,303
|
)
|
|
|
84,355
|
|
|
|
(209.3
|
)%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
17,951
|
|
|
|
6,374
|
|
|
|
11,577
|
|
|
|
181.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
26,101
|
|
|
|
(46,677
|
)
|
|
|
72,778
|
|
|
|
(155.9
|
)%
|
Losses attributable to noncontrolling interest, net of tax
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
(1,246
|
)
|
|
|
(58.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Globe Specialty Metals,
Inc.
|
|
$
|
26,976
|
|
|
|
(44,556
|
)
|
|
|
71,532
|
|
|
|
(160.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents consolidated operating results:
Net
Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended Dec 31, 2009
|
|
|
Six Months Ended Dec 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
|
$ (in 000s)
|
|
|
MT
|
|
|
$/MT
|
|
|
$ (in 000s)
|
|
|
MT
|
|
|
$/MT
|
|
|
Silicon metal
|
|
$
|
143,586
|
|
|
|
54,721
|
|
|
$
|
2,624
|
|
|
$
|
157,876
|
|
|
|
61,809
|
|
|
$
|
2,554
|
|
Silicon-based alloys
|
|
|
59,906
|
|
|
|
29,859
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
92,597
|
|
|
|
37,731
|
|
|
|
2,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silicon metal and silicon-based alloys
|
|
|
203,492
|
|
|
|
84,580
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
250,473
|
|
|
|
99,540
|
|
|
|
2,516
|
|
Silica fume and other
|
|
|
10,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
213,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
268,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $54,728,000, or 20%, from the prior year to
$213,736,000 primarily as a result of a 15% decline in tons sold
and a 4% decline in average selling price. The decrease in tons
sold resulted in a decline in net sales of $37,424,000 and was
related to a 12% and 21% decrease in silicon metal and
silicon-based alloy tons sold, respectively. The lower volume
came from fewer annual contracts and decreased spot sales caused
by the global economic recession, which resulted in an across
the board reduction in end market demand. This decrease occurred
mostly in the first quarter of calendar year 2009. The decline
in average selling price resulted in decreased net sales of
approximately $9,557,000 and was a result of an 18% decrease in
the average selling price of silicon-based alloys, offset by a
3% increase in the average selling price of silicon metal. The
decline in silicon-based alloy pricing was due to a significant
reduction in steel production driven by lower automobile
production and construction spending. This resulted in an
overall reduction in customer demand, which caused us to reduce
pricing to retain volume and also caused a mix shift towards the
production of ferrosilicon, which is our lowest priced alloy.
The increase in silicon metal pricing was primarily due to
favorable annual contracts with key customers entered into at
the end of calendar year 2008. Silica fume and other revenue
decreased by $7,747,000 as a
38
result of a decline of $2,585,000 in our sales of electrodes to
third parties, and lower production levels and sales of other
by-products.
The GMI segment includes the Alloy joint venture, which was
entered into on November 5, 2009, and sells 49% of the
output of the Alloy plant to Dow Corning at cost. We control the
joint venture and consolidate its results in our financial
statements.
Cost of
Goods Sold:
The $31,143,000, or 16%, decrease in cost of goods sold was a
result of a 15% decline in tons sold and a 1% decline in cost
per ton sold. This decline in cost per ton sold was the result
of several factors including the curtailment of Solsil
production, which lowered cost of goods sold by $8,105,000 and
tons sold by only 180, a mix shift within silicon-based alloys
to lower cost ferrosilicon, which reduced cost of goods sold by
approximately $5,700,000 and our overall cost reduction
programs. These cost decreases were partially offset by lower
capacity utilization during the first two quarters of fiscal
year 2010 and
start-up
costs totaling $3,892,000 primarily at our Niagara Falls and
Selma plants.
Gross margin represented approximately 26% of net sales in the
first half of fiscal year 2009 and decreased to approximately
21% of net sales in the first half of fiscal year 2010,
primarily as a result of the start-up costs for Niagara Falls
and Selma and the lower silicon-based alloy average selling
price.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses:
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of
$7,835,000, or 23%, was largely due to the write-off of
$2,527,000 of deferred offering costs in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2009, caused by a more than 90 day delay in our
initial public offering, a decrease of $1,478,000 and $618,000
in audit and audit related professional fees at Corporate and
Yonvey, respectively, a decrease of $658,000 of wages, insurance
and general expense at Yonvey through aggressive cost cutting
measures, a decrease of $491,000 primarily in salaries and wages
at Solsil due to the suspension of commercial production, and a
decrease of approximately $2,243,000 at Metais, of which
$1,100,000 was due to the timing of the sale of our Brazilian
plant, and the balance was due to aggressive cost reduction
measures. These decreases were offset in part by an increase in
bonus accruals, and salaries and benefits of $678,000 and
$524,000, respectively at Corporate.
Research
and Development:
The decrease in research and development expenses of $761,000
was primarily due to the suspension of production and related
activities at Solsil, which resulted in a decrease of $667,000.
Gain on
Sale of Globe Metais:
Gain on sale of Globe Metais recorded in the second quarter of
fiscal year 2010 was approximately $22,907,000 and was net of
transaction expense of $2,699,000. The gain was associated with
the sale of our Brazilian operations on November 5, 2009
for net cash proceeds of $65,600,000, which represented a
purchase price of $75,000,000 less withholding taxes and certain
expenses.
Goodwill
and Intangible Asset Impairment:
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment for the second quarter
of fiscal year 2009 was approximately $69,560,000 and was
associated with the Solsil business unit. The global economic
slowdown, combined with a decrease in oil prices, caused a sharp
decline in the product price and demand for upgraded
metallurgical grade silicon. As a result, it was determined that
the value of the Solsil business unit no longer supported its
goodwill and intangible asset balances.
39
Net
Interest Expense:
Net interest expense decreased by $1,398,000 due the refinancing
and repayment of credit facilities at GMI and Yonvey, which
resulted in lower average debt balances and interest rates, and
the timing of the sale of our Brazilian operations on
November 5, 2009.
Other
Income (Loss):
Other income (loss) increased by $5,398,000 due to a
year-over-year foreign exchange gain of $6,712,000, driven by
the fluctuation of the Brazilian real against the
U.S. dollar, offset by a reduction in dividend income from
hydropower investments in Argentina of $341,000 and a decrease
of $413,000 of other income related to royalties associated with
the lease of certain property at GMI. The foreign exchange gain
at Globe Metais of $3,790,000 primarily consisted of a gain
associated with the revaluation of long-term real denominated
tax assets of $2,941,000 and a gain of $849,000 on our foreign
exchange forward contracts. This resulted in a net gain in
foreign exchange of $3,790,000 in the first six months of fiscal
year 2010 compared to a net loss of $4,368,000 in the first half
of fiscal year 2009. Corporate had a year-over-year loss of
$1,572,000 related to the revaluation of real denominated
liabilities.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
Provision for income taxes as a percentage of pre-tax income was
approximately 41%, or $17,951,000, in the first half of fiscal
year 2010 and (16%), or $6,374,000, in the first half of fiscal
year 2009. The change in our tax provision was primarily due to
the fact that the goodwill impairment charge recorded in the
second quarter of fiscal year 2009 arose from a non-taxable
acquisition and no tax benefit was obtained from the impairment
charge. The increase in the effective tax rate is also due to
the payment of income taxes totaling $9,395,000 in connection
with the sale of Globe Metais, the exclusion of the impact of
net losses from our Chinese operations, the tax benefit of which
may not be realized due to a history of operating losses, as
well as a reduction in the benefit from tax holidays in
Argentina.
Segment
Operations
GMI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
147,375
|
|
|
|
174,895
|
|
|
|
(27,520
|
)
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
115,921
|
|
|
|
126,294
|
|
|
|
(10,373
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9,608
|
|
|
|
9,479
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
21,927
|
|
|
|
39,122
|
|
|
|
(17,195
|
)
|
|
|
(44.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $27,520,000, or 16%, from the prior year to
$147,375,000. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 16%
decline in tons sold, partially offset by a 1% increase in
average selling price. Silicon metal volume was down 4% due to a
decline in end market demand from our silicone and aluminum
customers. Silicon-based alloy volume was down 34% due to a
decline in demand for magnesium ferrosilicon primarily from the
automotive industry. Pricing for silicon metal was up 8% due to
favorable annual contracts. Pricing for silicon-based alloys was
down 15% due to a product mix shift towards ferrosilicon coupled
with reduced ferrosilicon pricing, which was the result of
reduced demand and aggressive foreign imports.
The GMI segment includes the Alloy joint venture, which was
entered into on November 5, 2009, and sells 49% of the
output of the Alloy plant to Dow Corning at cost. We control the
joint venture and consolidate its results in our financial
statements. As a result of the joint venture, GMIs total
sales and gross margin have been reduced by
40
virtue of the material sold to Dow Corning at cost. Silicon
metal pricing was down 4% from the immediately preceding quarter
largely due to material supplied at cost under the joint venture
agreement.
Operating income decreased by $17,195,000 from the prior year to
$21,927,000. This was primarily due to increased production
costs and lower average selling prices. Cost of goods sold
decreased by only 8% while volumes decreased 15%. This caused an
increase in the cost per ton sold, which was due to reduced
capacity utilization,
start-up
costs of $3,618,000 at Niagara Falls and Selma and higher
electrode prices.
Globe
Metais
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
40,980
|
|
|
|
58,466
|
|
|
|
(17,486
|
)
|
|
|
(29.9
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
32,671
|
|
|
|
42,046
|
|
|
|
(9,375
|
)
|
|
|
(22.3
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
|
|
4,844
|
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
|
(46.3
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(89.7
|
)%
|
Gain on sale of Globe Metais
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
3,949
|
|
|
|
11,469
|
|
|
|
(7,520
|
)
|
|
|
(65.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $17,486,000, or 30%, from the prior year to
$40,980,000. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 30%
decrease in tons sold and a decrease in the sale of by-products
of $2,513,000, offset by a 3% increase in average selling
prices. The decrease in volume was due to the timing of the sale
of our Brazilian plant on November 5, 2009 and the global
economic recession, which caused a pronounced decline in
domestic Brazilian demand and European demand from producers of
silicones and aluminum. We experienced a year over year increase
in pricing due to favorable annual contracts entered into at the
end of calendar year 2008 and the retention of certain favorable
export contracts following the sale of our Brazilian
manufacturing operations to Dow Corning.
Operating income decreased by $7,520,000, or 66%, from the prior
year to $3,949,000. The decrease was primarily due to the timing
of the sale of our Brazilian manufacturing operations, which led
to lower sales volumes and expenses from the sale of Globe
Metais of $1,748,000, offset by lower selling, general and
administrative expenses due to the timing of the sale and
aggressive cost reduction measures. Cost of goods sold decreased
22% while volumes decreased 30%, which caused an increase in the
cost per ton sold. This increase was due to lower capacity
utilization and increased production costs associated with the
appreciation of the real, which was offset by gains on our
foreign exchange forward contract, which are recorded in other
income. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
by $2,243,000 due to the timing of the sale of our Brazilian
plant on November 5, 2009, which resulted in a cost
reduction of approximately $1,100,000.
The current quarter gain on sale of Globe Metais reflects only
transaction costs of $1,748,000 associated with the sale of our
Brazilian manufacturing operations, as the gain on the sale of
the manufacturing operations is reported in the Corporate
operating segment.
Globe
Metales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
23,523
|
|
|
|
32,638
|
|
|
|
(9,115
|
)
|
|
|
(27.9
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
15,761
|
|
|
|
19,527
|
|
|
|
(3,766
|
)
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
(362
|
)
|
|
|
(19.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
6,234
|
|
|
|
11,221
|
|
|
|
(4,987
|
)
|
|
|
(44.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
Net sales decreased $9,115,000, or 28%, from the prior year to
$23,523,000. The decrease was primarily attributable to a 34%
decrease in average selling price offset by a 10% increase in
tons sold. Pricing decreased due to the completion of certain
favorable long-term contracts, a change in product mix, which
included the sale of lower priced ferrosilicon, the market price
of which was affected by a reduction in global steel production.
Volumes increased primarily due to the re-entry of Globe Metales
into the lower priced ferrosilicon market.
Operating income decreased by $4,987,000 from the prior year to
$6,234,000. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in
average selling prices only partially offset by lower
productions costs. Average selling prices decreased by 34% and
cost per ton decreased by only 27%. The reduced gross margin and
operating income resulted primarily from the change in product
mix, which included the production of lower priced ferrosilicon
partially offset by our aggressive cost reduction initiatives.
Solsil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
(1,985
|
)
|
|
|
(99.0
|
)%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
8,629
|
|
|
|
(8,105
|
)
|
|
|
(93.9
|
)%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
(63.3
|
)%
|
Research and development
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
|
|
(86.7
|
)%
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,560
|
|
|
|
(69,560
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
(77,729
|
)
|
|
|
76,838
|
|
|
|
(98.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $1,985,000 from the prior year to $20,000.
The decrease was primarily attributable to Solsil suspending
commercial production as a result of a significant decline in
the price of polysilicon and the decline in demand for upgraded
metallurgical grade silicon. As a result, we are concentrating
our efforts on research and development activities focused on
reducing our cost of production.
Cost of goods sold decreased $8,105,000 from the prior year to
$524,000. Cost of goods sold in the first half of fiscal year
2009 was $6,624,000 in excess of sales, reflecting Solsils
additional investment to refine its production processes.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $491,000
and research and development expenses decreased $667,000 as a
result of suspended production and the focus on enhancing
production yields and lowering the cost of production. Solsil
recorded a goodwill and intangible asset impairment in the
second quarter of fiscal year 2009 of $69,560,000. The global
economic slowdown, combined with the decrease in oil prices,
caused a sharp decline in the product price and demand for
upgraded metallurgical grade silicon. As a result, it was
determined that the value of the Solsil business no longer
supported its goodwill and intangible asset balances.
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
10,785
|
|
|
|
14,350
|
|
|
|
(3,565
|
)
|
|
|
(24.8
|
)%
|
Gain on sale of Globe Metais
|
|
|
(24,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,655
|
)
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
13,870
|
|
|
|
(14,350
|
)
|
|
|
28,220
|
|
|
|
(196.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income increased by $28,220,000 from the prior year to
$13,870,000. The increase was primarily due to the $24,655,000
gain on the sale of Globe Metais recorded in the second quarter
of fiscal year 2010, which was net of transaction expenses of
$951,000 at Corporate. The gain was associated with the sale of
our Brazilian
42
plant on November 5, 2009 for net cash proceeds of
approximately $65,600,000, representing a purchase price of
$75,000,000 less income taxes and transaction expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$3,565,000, or 25%, from the prior year to $10,785,000. This was
primarily due to the write-off of $2,527,000 of deferred
offering costs in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 because
our initial public offering was postponed by more than
90 days, a decrease of $1,478,000 in audit and audit
related professional fees, partially offset by an increase in
bonus and bonus accruals of $678,000 and an increase in salaries
and benefits of $524,000.
Gain on sale of Globe Metais reflects the gain on the sale of
our Brazilian manufacturing operations, net of transaction costs
totaling $951,000 incurred by Corporate.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Sources
of Liquidity
Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows from
operations and available borrowings under GMIs revolving
credit facility. At December 31, 2009, our cash and cash
equivalents balance was approximately $252,231,000. At
December 31, 2009, we had $18,070,000 available on a
revolving credit facility; there was no outstanding balance on
the revolving credit facility at December 31, 2009,
however, there were outstanding letters of credit in the amount
of $8,120,000 associated with foreign supplier contracts and
$1,810,000 associated with a power supply contract. In
connection with the Dow Corning transactions discussed
under Overview and Recent Developments, we agreed to
modify the terms of our senior credit facility. The
modifications included a reduction of revolving credit from
$35,000,000 to $28,000,000 in exchange for the release of the
assets of West Virginia Alloys as security for the senior credit
facility. Additionally, we will be required to make a tax
payment of approximately $33,200,000 during the third quarter of
fiscal year 2010 related to the gain from the sale of the 49%
interest in the Alloy joint venture to Dow Corning.
Our subsidiaries borrow funds in order to finance capital
expansion programs. The terms of certain of those financing
arrangements place restrictions on distributions of funds to us,
however, we do not expect this to have an impact on our ability
to meet our cash obligations. We believe we have access to
adequate resources to meet our needs for normal operating costs,
capital expenditure, mandatory debt redemptions, and working
capital for our existing business. These resources include cash
and cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities, and
unused lines of credit. Given the current uncertainty in the
financial markets, our ability to access capital and the terms
under which we can do so may change. Should we be required to
raise capital in this environment, potential outcomes might
include higher borrowing costs, less available capital, more
stringent terms and tighter covenants, or in extreme conditions,
an inability to raise capital. We estimate that our fiscal year
2010 capital expenditures will be approximately $20,000,000,
which includes approximately $12,000,000 for maintenance capital
expenditures and approximately $8,000,000 for scheduled
enhancement projects. This amount could increase if we undertake
additional projects. Our ability to satisfy debt service
obligations, to fund planned capital expenditures and make
acquisitions will depend upon our future operating performance,
which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in our
industry as well as financial, business and other factors, some
of which are beyond our control.
See Long-Term Debt for a summary of our long-term debt
agreements.
43
Cash
Flows
The following table is a summary of the consolidated cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
61,876
|
|
|
$
|
73,994
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,761
|
|
|
|
24,183
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
143,845
|
|
|
|
(31,427
|
)
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
27,782
|
|
|
|
(11,414
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
252,231
|
|
|
$
|
55,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities:
Our business is cyclical and cash flows from operating
activities may fluctuate during the year and from year-to-year
due to economic conditions.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $18,761,000 and
$24,183,000 during the first six months of fiscal year 2010 and
2009, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities
excludes changes in our operating assets and liabilities
associated with the sale of Globe Metais, but include the
operating cash flows of Globe Metais prior to the
November 5, 2009 date of sale. Excluding the impact of the
one-time goodwill and intangible asset charge and the gain on
the sale of Globe Metais, the $5,422,000 decrease in net cash
provided by operating activities was due to an increase in net
working capital and lower operating results. In the first half
of fiscal year 2010, accounts receivable increased significantly
due to the
start-up of
Niagara Falls and an increase in sales to certain customers at
the end of the calendar year. In the first half of fiscal year
2010, accounts payable increased due to additional maintenance
and furnace overhaul at the end of the period and purchases
associated with the restart of furnaces. In the first half of
2010, the Company reduced accrued liabilities due to recognition
of deferred revenue based on product shipment.
Investing
Activities:
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was
approximately $143,845,000 and $(31,427,000) during the first
six months of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. In the
first six months of fiscal year 2010, $158,445,000 of cash was
provided by the sale of 100% of our interest in Globe Metais and
the sale of a 49% interest in WVA Manufacturing, LLC, net of
cash transferred with the sale of Globe Metais of $16,555,000.
Year over year capital expenditures decreased from approximately
$34,754,000 to $9,915,000 as capital expenditures related to the
reopening and expansion of the Niagara Falls facility, capital
investments to increase the upgraded metallurgical grade silicon
capacity of Solsil, and capital improvements at Yonvey have
largely been completed. Capital expenditures in the first six
months of fiscal year 2010 primarily consisted of maintenance
capital expenditure and the completion of the Niagara Falls
facility expansion. Net cash provided by investing activities of
approximately $2,987,000 in the first six months of fiscal year
2009 was due to the redemption of U.S. government treasury
securities. Net cash used in other investing activities of
$4,685,000 consisted primarily of expenses related to the Dow
Corning transactions.
Financing
Activities:
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was
approximately $27,782,000 and $(11,414,000) during the first six
months of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase
of approximately $39,196,000 in cash provided by financing
activities was mainly due to proceeds from the close of our
initial public offering and listing on the NASDAQ of
$36,456,000, net of underwriting discounts and commissions of
$2,744,000. This was partially offset by the net repayment of
approximately $9,234,000 of long-term and short-term debt during
the first six months of fiscal year 2010, compared to a net
repayment of $8,157,000 in the first six months of fiscal year
2009.
44
Cash provided by warrant and UPO exercises increased by
approximately $664,000 year over year, as UPO and warrant
holders exercised these financial instruments prior to their
expiration in October 2009.
Exchange
Rate Change on Cash:
The effect of exchange rate changes on cash was related to
fluctuations in renminbi, the functional currency of our Chinese
subsidiary, Yonvey.
Commitments
and Contractual Obligations
In connection with the sale of our Brazilian manufacturing
operations, $14,000,000 of export prepayment financing was
transferred to Dow Corning, as well as the related interest rate
swap. We also settled the foreign exchange forward contracts
utilized to manage a portion of our net foreign currency
exposure to the Brazilian real in November 2009, prior to the
sale of our Brazilian manufacturing operations. In addition, in
connection with the joint venture agreement with
Dow Corning at our Alloy plant, we agreed to modify the
terms of our senior term loan and senior credit facility. These
modifications included a $6,000,000 prepayment of the senior
term loan, applied to reduce the scheduled installments of
principal in inverse order of maturity, and a reduction of
revolving credit from $35,000,000 to $28,000,000 in exchange for
the release of the assets of West Virginia Alloys as security
for both the senior term loan and senior credit facility.
Our remaining commitments and contractual obligations have not
changed significantly from those disclosed in
Part II Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Commitments and
Contractual Obligations of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
Internal
Controls and Procedures
We are required to comply with the internal control requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2009, we identified certain
deficiencies in our internal controls that we considered to be
significant deficiencies. We continue to remediate these
significant deficiencies, but the corrective actions we have
taken have not been fully tested and may not adequately resolve
the remaining significant deficiencies. Management intends to
complete its control assessment and cure any significant
deficiencies by the end of fiscal year 2010, when our management
must provide an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal
controls and procedures and our auditors must provide an
attestation thereof.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements or
relationships with unconsolidated entities of financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities.
Litigation
and Contingencies
We are subject to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings that
arise in the normal course of business, including employment,
commercial, environmental, safety and health matters, as well as
claims associated with our historical acquisitions. Although it
is not presently possible to determine the outcome of these
matters, in the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition
of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or
liquidity.
At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, there are no
significant liabilities recorded for environmental
contingencies. With respect to the cost for ongoing
environmental compliance, including maintenance and monitoring,
such costs are expensed as incurred unless there is a long-term
monitoring agreement with a governmental agency, in which case a
liability is established at the inception of the agreement.
45
Long-Term
Debt
Long-term debt comprises the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Senior term loan
|
|
$
|
21,127
|
|
|
|
33,684
|
|
Export prepayment financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22,371
|
|
|
|
52,925
|
|
Less current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(9,641
|
)
|
|
|
(16,561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
$
|
12,730
|
|
|
|
36,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Term Loan The Companys
subsidiary, GMI, entered into a five-year senior term loan in an
aggregate principal amount of $40,000 during September 2008.
Interest on the senior term loan accrues at LIBOR plus an
applicable margin percentage or, at the Companys option,
prime plus an applicable margin percentage. Principal payments
are due in quarterly installments of $2,105, commencing on
December 31, 2008, and the unpaid principal balance is due
in full in September 2013, subject to certain mandatory
prepayments. A mandatory prepayment of $2,347 was made during
the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 based on excess cash
flow, as defined in the loan agreement, generated during fiscal
year 2009. As part of the Dow Corning transactions, the Company
made a $6,000 prepayment of the senior term loan, applied to the
scheduled installments of principal in inverse order of
maturity, in exchange for the release of the assets of West
Virginia Alloys as security for the senior term loan. The
interest rate on this loan was 2.48%, equal to LIBOR plus 2.25%,
at December 31, 2009. The senior term loan is secured by
substantially all of the assets of GMI and is subject to certain
restrictive and financial covenants, which include limits on
additional debt, restrictions on capital expenditures,
restrictions on dividend and other equity distributions, a
maximum ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization, and minimum net worth and
interest coverage requirements. The Company was in compliance
with these loan covenants at December 31, 2009.
Export Prepayment Financing The export
prepayment financing debt was related to Globe Metais, which was
sold in November 2009 as discussed under Overview and
Recent Developments.
Recently
Implemented Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles
used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with
U.S. GAAP (the GAAP hierarchy). This statement establishes
the FASB Accounting Standards
Codificationtm
(the Codification/ASC) as the source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, except for SEC
rules and interpretive releases, which are also authoritative
U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification standard
(FASB ASC Subtopic
105-10 on
generally accepted accounting principles) was adopted on
July 1, 2009. This change had no effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic
805-10,
Business Combinations. This statement establishes
principles and requirements for how the acquirer
(i) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquired entity,
(ii) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the
business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and
(iii) determines what information to disclose to enable
users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. This accounting
standard was adopted on July 1, 2009. This statement will
be applied prospectively to the Companys business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
July 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic
810-10,
Consolidation Consolidation of Entities
Controlled by Contract (ASC 810.10) and ASC Subtopic
815-40,
Derivatives and Hedging Contracts in
Entitys
46
Own Equity (ASC 815.40). The Company adopted ASC 810.10
and ASC 815.40 on July 1, 2009. The objective of these
statements is to improve the relevance, comparability, and
transparency of the financial information that a reporting
entity provides in its financial statements by establishing
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. In accordance with ASC 810.10 and ASC 815.40, the
Company has provided the enhanced disclosures required by ASC
810.10 and ASC 815.40 in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets and condensed consolidated statement of changes in
stockholders equity for all periods presented.
In September 2006, the FASB issued ASC Subtopic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). The
Company partially adopted ASC 820 on July 1, 2008. This
adoption did not have a material impact to the Companys
consolidated results of operations or financial condition. The
Company fully adopted ASC 820 on July 1, 2009. ASC 820
defines fair value, establishes a framework for the measurement
of fair value, and enhances disclosures about fair value
measurements. The statement does not require any new fair value
measures. The Company carries its derivative agreements, as well
as available-for-sale securities, at fair value, determined
using observable market based inputs. See our December 31,
2009 and 2008 condensed consolidated financial statements for
additional information.
In September 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
740-10,
Income Taxes (ASC 740). The Company adopted this
amendment on December 31, 2009. This amendment to ASC 740
adds implementation guidance for all entities about applying the
accounting requirements for uncertain tax matters. The
implementation of this additional guidance had no effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations. See
our December 31, 2009 and 2008 condensed consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
Accounting
Pronouncements to be Implemented
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
860-10,
Transfers and Servicing (ASC 860). The objective of this
amendment is to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a
reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a
transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred
financial assets. This amendment improves financial reporting by
eliminating (1) the exceptions for qualifying
special-purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and
(2) the exception that permitted sale accounting for
certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has not
surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. This
amendment is effective for the Company on July 1, 2010. The
Company is currently assessing the potential effect of the
amendment of ASC 860 on its financial position or results of
operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
810-10,
Consolidation Variable Interest Entities (ASC
810). The objective of this amendment is to improve financial
reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest
entities by eliminating the quantitative-based risks and rewards
calculation and requiring an enterprise to perform an analysis
to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or
interests give it a controlling interest in a variable interest
entity. In addition, the amendment requires an ongoing
reassessment of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity. This amendment is effective for
the Company on July 1, 2010. The Company is currently
assessing the potential effect of the amendment to ASC 810 on
its financial position or results of operations.
In December 2008, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
715-10,
Compensation Retirement Benefits (ASC 715).
This amendment provides guidance on an employers
disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or
other postretirement plan. The amendment requires employers of
public entities to disclose more information about how
investment allocation decisions are made, more information about
major categories of plan assets, including concentrations of
risk and fair-value measurements, and the fair-value techniques
and inputs used to measure plan assets. The disclosure
requirements of the amendment to ASC 715 are effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company
does not believe the amendment to ASC 715 will have a
significant impact on the Companys financial position or
results of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC Subtopic
820-10,
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820). This
amendment requires reporting entities to make new disclosures
about recurring or
47
nonrecurring fair value measurements including significant
transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair
value measurements and information about purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the
reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The
amendment also clarifies existing fair value measurement
disclosure guidance about the level of disaggregation, inputs,
and valuation techniques. The disclosure requirements of the
amendment to ASC 820, except for the detailed Level 3 roll
forward disclosures, is effective for annual and interim
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The
new disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and
settlements in the roll forward activity for Level 3 fair
value measurements are effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The
Company is currently assessing the potential effect of the
amendment to ASC 820 on its financial position and results of
operations.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
In connection with the sale of our Brazilian manufacturing
operations, we transferred our long-term lease mining rights and
forest reserves in Brazil, as well as $14,000,000 of export
prepayment financing and the related interest rate swap, to Dow
Corning. Further, we settled the remaining foreign exchange
forward contracts utilized to manage a portion of our net
foreign currency exposure to the Brazilian real in November
2009, prior to the sale of our Brazilian manufacturing
operations. With the sale of our Brazilian manufacturing
operations, our exposure to commodity price fluctuations in
Brazil, as well as foreign exchange rate fluctuations with the
Brazilian real have been substantially reduced. We retained
certain export customers from the Brazilian operations, and for
calendar year 2010 we will be buying material from Dow Corning
for sale to these export customers and expect to earn only a
modest gross margin on the sales.
Our remaining market risks have not changed significantly from
those disclosed in Part II
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (our Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, respectively), we have evaluated our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a -15(e)) as of December 31, 2009.
Based upon that evaluation, our Principal Executive Officers and
Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the report that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In the ordinary course of business, we are subject to periodic
lawsuits, investigations, claims and proceedings, including, but
not limited to, contractual disputes, employment, environmental,
health and safety matters, as well as claims associated with our
historical acquisitions. Although we cannot predict with
certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations,
claims and proceedings asserted against us, we do not believe
any currently pending legal proceeding to which we are a party
will have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects,
financial condition, cash flows, results of operations or
liquidity.
48
A description of the risks associated with our business,
financial condition, and results of operations is set forth in
Part I Item 1A. Risk
Factors of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. There have been no
material changes in our risks from such description, except as
follows:
Our
business is particularly sensitive to increases in energy costs
which could materially increase our cost of
production.
As discussed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
due to the fact that energy constitutes a high percentage of our
production costs, we are particularly vulnerable to cost
fluctuations in the energy industry. The energy which we use is
subject to price volatility caused by changes in global supply
and demand and governmental controls, and we attempt to reduce
the impact of increases in our energy costs by negotiating
long-term contracts.
As of October 31, 2009, our power agreement related to our
operations in Argentina expired, and we expect prices to
increase under a new contract. Negotiations on a fixed-price
long-term contract are ongoing, however, a new contract has not
been formalized as of the date of issuance of this report. The
non-renewal of this contract, or a material increase in the
price of energy, could materially adversely affect our future
earnings and our low cost competitive advantage. If we are not
able to increase our sales prices to mitigate our exposure to
rising energy prices, it could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations and operating cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Globe Specialty Metals, Inc.
(Registrant)
Jeff Bradley
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Malcolm
Appelbaum
|
Malcolm Appelbaum
Chief Financial Officer
February 16, 2010
50