Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-34776
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
80-0554627 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 1500 |
|
|
Houston, Texas |
|
77002 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(281) 404-9500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding at May 11, 2011: 92,427,300 shares.
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
354,990 |
|
|
$ |
143,520 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
114,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable oil and gas revenues |
|
|
27,820 |
|
|
|
25,909 |
|
Accounts receivable joint interest partners |
|
|
33,352 |
|
|
|
28,596 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
3,595 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
9,624 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
544,602 |
|
|
|
205,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas properties (successful efforts method) |
|
|
655,759 |
|
|
|
580,968 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment |
|
|
(113,048 |
) |
|
|
(99,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
544,973 |
|
|
|
483,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred costs and other assets |
|
|
12,018 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,101,593 |
|
|
$ |
691,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
8,198 |
|
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
8,039 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
Revenues payable and production taxes |
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
6,180 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
37,508 |
|
|
|
58,239 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
25,497 |
|
|
|
6,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
82,064 |
|
|
|
82,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
7,640 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
16,143 |
|
|
|
3,943 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
48,425 |
|
|
|
45,432 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
556,678 |
|
|
|
140,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized;
92,407,800 and 92,240,345 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 20,595 shares |
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
644,246 |
|
|
|
643,719 |
|
Retained deficit |
|
|
(99,692 |
) |
|
|
(92,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
544,915 |
|
|
|
551,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,101,593 |
|
|
$ |
691,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
per share data) |
|
Oil and gas revenues |
|
$ |
58,744 |
|
|
$ |
20,068 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
2,977 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
6,083 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
13,812 |
|
|
|
5,849 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
33,200 |
|
|
|
22,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
(31,154 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
Realized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,198 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(36,552 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(11,008 |
) |
|
|
(3,231 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(6,847 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (Note 10) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (Note 10) |
|
|
92,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Paid-in-Capital |
|
|
Retained Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance as of
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
92,240 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
643,719 |
|
|
$ |
(92,845 |
) |
|
$ |
551,794 |
|
Stock-based
compensation |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
527 |
|
Treasury stock
tax withholdings |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(559 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,847 |
) |
|
|
(6,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March
31, 2011 |
|
|
92,408 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
(559 |
) |
|
$ |
644,246 |
|
|
$ |
(99,692 |
) |
|
$ |
544,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Oasis Petroleum Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(6,847 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,231 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
13,812 |
|
|
|
5,849 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
31,666 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
Debt discount amortization and other |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Working capital and other changes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accounts receivable |
|
|
(6,667 |
) |
|
|
(5,263 |
) |
Change in inventory |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
269 |
|
Change in prepaid expenses |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Change in other current assets |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in other assets |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(7,448 |
) |
|
|
1,153 |
|
Change in other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
22,845 |
|
|
|
7,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(91,126 |
) |
|
|
(34,561 |
) |
Derivative settlements |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(114,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advances to joint interest partners |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
Advances from joint interest partners |
|
|
4,938 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(200,789 |
) |
|
|
(32,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Principal payments on credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(10,027 |
) |
|
|
(1,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
389,414 |
|
|
|
(13,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
211,470 |
|
|
|
(37,952 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
143,520 |
|
|
|
40,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
354,990 |
|
|
$ |
2,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accrued capital expenditures |
|
$ |
(16,644 |
) |
|
$ |
2,433 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Organization and Operations of the Company
Organization
Oasis Petroleum Inc. (Oasis or the Company) was formed on February 25, 2010, pursuant to
the laws of the State of Delaware, to become a publicly traded entity and the parent company of
Oasis Petroleum LLC, the Companys predecessor. Oasis Petroleum LLC was formed as a Delaware
limited liability company on February 26, 2007 by certain members of the Companys senior
management team and through investments made by Oasis Petroleum Management LLC (OPM) and certain
private equity funds managed by EnCap Investments L.P. (EnCap). OPM, a Delaware limited liability
company, was formed in February 2007 to allow Company employees to become indirect investors in
Oasis Petroleum LLC. In April 2008, the Company formed Oasis Petroleum International LLC (OPI), a
Delaware limited liability company, to conduct business development activities outside of the
United States of America. OPI currently has no business activities or material assets.
A corporate reorganization occurred concurrently with the completion of the Companys initial
public offering (IPO) of its common stock on June 22, 2010. The Company sold 30,370,000 shares
and OAS Holding Company LLC (OAS Holdco), the selling stockholder, sold 17,930,000 shares of the
Companys common stock, in each case, at $14.00 per share. After deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions of approximately $25.5 million, the Company received net proceeds of $399.7
million. The selling stockholder received aggregate net proceeds of approximately $236.0 million.
The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares by OAS Holdco. As a part of
this corporate reorganization, the Company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in
Oasis Petroleum LLC, in exchange for shares of the Companys common stock. The Companys business
continues to be conducted through Oasis Petroleum LLC, as a wholly owned subsidiary.
Nature of Business
The Company is an independent exploration and production company focused on the acquisition
and development of unconventional oil and natural gas resources primarily in the Williston Basin.
The Companys assets, which consist of proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties, are
located primarily in the Montana and North Dakota areas of the Williston Basin, and are owned by
Oasis Petroleum North America LLC (OPNA), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which was
formed on May 17, 2007 as a Delaware limited liability company.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the
accounts of Oasis and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Oasis Petroleum LLC, OPNA and OPI. The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have not been audited by
the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, except that the condensed consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2010 is derived from audited financial statements. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation have
been included. In preparing the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements,
management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the condensed
consolidated financial statements and disclosures of contingencies. Actual results may differ from
those estimates. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual results.
These interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain
disclosures have been condensed or omitted from these financial statements. Accordingly, they do
not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (GAAP) for complete consolidated financial statements and should
be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010 (2010 Annual Report).
5
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company invests in certain money market funds, commercial paper and time deposits, all of
which are stated at fair value. The Company classifies all such investments with original maturity
dates less than 90 days as cash equivalents. The Company classifies all such investments with
original maturity dates greater than 90 days as held-to-maturity securities based on managements
intentions to hold the investments to their maturity date.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock shares represent shares withheld by the Company to pay tax withholding
obligations of certain employees upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. These shares are not
part of a publicly announced program to repurchase shares of the Companys common stock and are
accounted for at cost. The Company does not have a publicly announced program to repurchase shares
of common stock.
3. Inventory
Equipment and materials consist primarily of tubular goods and well equipment to be used in
future drilling or repair operations and are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost
determined on an average cost method. Crude oil inventories are valued at the lower of average cost
or market value. Inventory consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Equipment and materials |
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
$ |
640 |
|
Crude oil inventory |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventory |
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
1,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Property, Plant and Equipment
The following table sets forth the Companys property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Proved oil and gas properties(1) |
|
$ |
556,028 |
|
|
$ |
479,657 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment |
|
|
(112,496 |
) |
|
|
(98,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas properties, net |
|
|
443,532 |
|
|
|
380,836 |
|
Unproved oil and gas properties |
|
|
99,731 |
|
|
|
101,311 |
|
Other property and equipment |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
544,973 |
|
|
$ |
483,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in the Companys proved oil and gas properties are asset retirement costs of
$8.0 million and $6.3 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
As a result of expiring unproved property leases, the Company recorded non-cash impairment
charges on its unproved oil and gas properties of $1.4 million and $3.1 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No impairment charges on proved oil and natural
gas properties were recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
6
5. Fair Value Measurements
The Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standard Boards (FASB) authoritative guidance
on fair value measurements effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities and
effective January 1, 2009 for non-
financial assets and liabilities. The Companys financial assets and liabilities are measured
at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company recognizes its non-financial assets and
liabilities, such as asset retirement obligations and proved oil and natural gas properties upon
impairment, at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
As defined in the authoritative guidance, fair value is the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date (exit price). To estimate fair value, the Company utilizes market data or
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including
assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These
inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.
The authoritative guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used
to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority
to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are
as follows:
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset
or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing
basis.
Level 2 Pricing inputs, other than unadjusted quoted prices in active markets included in
Level 1, are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. Level 2 includes
those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These
models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted
forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors and current market and contractual
prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially
all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the
instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which
transactions are executed in the marketplace.
Level 3 Pricing inputs are generally less observable from objective sources, requiring
internally developed valuation methodologies that result in managements best estimate of fair
value.
As required, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment
of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may
affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value
hierarchy levels. The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the
Companys financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fair value as of March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
215,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
215,100 |
|
Commodity derivative instruments (Note 6) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(41,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
215,100 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(41,640 |
) |
|
$ |
173,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At fair value as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative instruments (Note 6) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Level 1 instruments presented in the table above consist of money market funds included in
Cash and cash equivalents on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2011.
The Companys money market funds represent cash equivalents backed by the assets of banks and other
liquid securities each with a minimum credit rating of A1/P1. The Company identified the money
market funds as Level 1 instruments due to the
fact that the money market funds have daily liquidity, quoted prices for the underlying
investments can be obtained and there are active markets for the underlying investments.
7
The Level 3 instruments presented in the tables above consist of oil collars. The fair value
of the Companys oil collars is based upon mark-to-market valuation reports provided by its
counterparties for monthly settlement purposes to determine the valuation of its derivative
instruments. The Company has a third-party reviewer evaluate other readily available market prices
for its derivative contracts as there is an active market for these contracts. However, the Company
does not have access to the specific valuation models used by its counterparties or third party
reviewer. The determination of the fair value of the Companys oil collars also incorporates a
credit adjustment for non-performance risk. The Company calculates the credit adjustment for
derivatives in an asset position using current credit default swap values for each counterparty.
The credit adjustment for derivatives in a liability position is based on the Companys current
cost of prime based borrowings (prime rate and associated margin effect). Based on these
calculations, the Company recorded a reduction to the fair value of its derivative instruments in
the amount of $1.6 million and $0.3 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the changes in fair value of the financial
assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance as of January 1 |
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,953 |
) |
Total gains or (losses) (realized or unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
(31,666 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Transfers in and out of level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31 |
|
$ |
(41,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in
earnings relating to derivatives still held at
March 31 |
|
$ |
(31,154 |
) |
|
$ |
(391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011, the Companys financial instruments, including certain cash and cash
equivalents, held-to-maturity investment accounts, accounts receivable and accounts payable, are
carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
The carrying amount of the Companys long-term debt reported in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet at March 31, 2011 is $400.0 million, which approximates fair value.
Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities
Asset Retirement Obligations The carrying amount of the Companys asset retirement
obligations (ARO) in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2011 is $9.3 million
(see Note 8 Asset Retirement Obligations). The Company determines the ARO by calculating the
present value of estimated cash flows related to the liability. Estimating the future ARO requires
management to make estimates and judgments regarding timing and existence of a liability, as well
as what constitutes adequate restoration. Inherent in the fair value calculation are numerous
assumptions and judgments, including the ultimate costs, inflation factors, credit adjusted
discount rates, timing of settlement and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and
political environments. These assumptions represent Level 3 inputs. To the extent future revisions
to these assumptions impact the fair value of the existing ARO liability, a corresponding
adjustment is made to the related asset.
Impairment The Company reviews its proved oil and natural gas properties for impairment
whenever events and circumstances indicate that a decline in the recoverability of their carrying
value may have occurred. The Company estimates the expected undiscounted future cash flows of its
oil and natural gas properties and compares such undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying
amount of the oil and natural gas properties to determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. If
the carrying amount exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the Company will adjust
the carrying amount of the oil and natural gas properties to fair value. The factors used to
determine fair value are subject to managements judgment and expertise and include, but are not
limited to, recent sales prices of comparable properties, the present value of future cash flows,
net of estimated operating and
development costs using estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing, future
production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures and various discount rates commensurate with
the risk and current market conditions associated with realizing the expected cash flows projected.
These assumptions represent Level 3 inputs. No impairment charges on proved oil and natural gas
properties were recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
8
6. Derivative Instruments
The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in
oil prices. As of March 31, 2011, the Company utilized two-way and three-way collar options to
reduce the volatility of oil prices on a significant portion of the Companys future expected oil
production. All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet as either assets or
liabilities measured at fair value (see Note 5 Fair Value Measurements). Derivative assets and
liabilities arising from the Companys derivative contracts with the same counterparty are also
reported on a net basis, as all counterparty contracts provide for net settlement. The Company has
not designated any derivative instruments as hedges for accounting purposes and does not enter into
such instruments for speculative trading purposes. If a derivative does not qualify as a hedge or
is not designated as a hedge, the changes in fair value, both realized and unrealized, are
recognized in the Other Income (Expense) section of the Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations as a gain or loss on mark-to-market derivative contracts. The Companys cash flow is
only impacted when the actual settlements under the derivative contracts result in making or
receiving a payment to or from the counterparty. These cash settlements are reflected as investing
activities in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding commodity derivative
contracts, all of which settle monthly based on the West Texas Intermediate crude oil index price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
|
Derivative |
|
Amount of |
|
|
Sub-Floor |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fair Value Asset |
|
Period |
|
Instrument |
|
Oil (Barrels) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Floor Price |
|
|
Ceiling Price |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
1,662,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82.66 |
|
|
$ |
100.60 |
|
|
|
(17,139 |
) |
2011 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
65.00 |
|
|
$ |
82.50 |
|
|
$ |
101.39 |
|
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
2012 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
1,024,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
84.58 |
|
|
$ |
102.52 |
|
|
|
(9,957 |
) |
2012 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
$ |
64.19 |
|
|
$ |
84.12 |
|
|
$ |
107.97 |
|
|
|
(8,628 |
) |
2013 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
411,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89.06 |
|
|
$ |
106.40 |
|
|
|
(1,749 |
) |
2013 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
427,000 |
|
|
$ |
68.73 |
|
|
$ |
88.73 |
|
|
$ |
119.34 |
|
|
|
(1,380 |
) |
2014 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
$ |
107.20 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
2014 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
$ |
70.00 |
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
$ |
122.45 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(41,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the location and fair value of all outstanding commodity
derivative contracts recorded in the balance sheet for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Instrument Assets (Liabilities) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Instrument Type |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Crude oil collars |
|
Derivative Instruments current liabilities |
|
|
(25,497 |
) |
|
|
(6,543 |
) |
Crude oil collars |
|
Derivative Instruments non-current liabilities |
|
|
(16,143 |
) |
|
|
(3,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivative Instruments |
|
$ |
(41,640 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table summarizes the location and amounts of realized and unrealized gains and
losses from the Companys commodity derivative contracts for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Income Statement Location |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Derivative Contracts |
|
Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments |
|
$ |
(31,154 |
) |
|
$ |
(391 |
) |
Derivative Contracts |
|
Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Instruments |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commodity Derivative Gain (Loss) |
|
$ |
(31,666 |
) |
|
$ |
(417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Long-Term Debt
Senior Secured Revolving Line of Credit The Company entered into its third amendment to its
amended and restated credit agreement (the Amended Credit Facility) on January 21, 2011. The
Amended Credit Facility provides for a senior secured revolving line of credit of up to $600.0
million and matures on February 26, 2015. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility are
collateralized by perfected first priority liens and security interests on substantially all of the
Companys assets, including mortgage liens on oil and natural gas properties having at least 80% of
the reserve value as determined by reserve reports.
Availability under the Amended Credit Facility is restricted to the borrowing base, which is
subject to semi-annual redeterminations on April 1 and October 1 of each year. On January 21, 2011,
a redetermination of the borrowing base under the Companys Amended Credit Facility was completed,
at the request of the Company, in lieu of the April 1, 2011 redetermination. As a result of this
redetermination, the Companys borrowing base increased from $120 million to $150 million, and was
then automatically decreased to $137.5 million in connection with the issuance of the Companys
private placement of $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes due 2019 on February 2, 2011
(discussed below).
Borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility are subject to varying rates of interest based on
(1) the total outstanding borrowings (including the value of all outstanding letters of credit) in
relation to the borrowing base and (2) whether the loan is a London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) loan or a bank prime interest rate loan (defined in the Amended Credit Facility as an
Alternate Based Rate or ABR loan). The LIBOR and ABR loans bear their respective interest rates
plus the applicable margin indicated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable Margin |
|
|
Applicable Margin |
|
Ratio of Total Outstanding Borrowings to Borrowing Base |
|
for LIBOR Loans |
|
|
for ABR Loans |
|
Less than .50 to 1 |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
0.50 |
% |
Greater than or equal to .50 to 1 but less than .75 to 1 |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
Greater than or equal to .75 to 1 but less than .85 to 1 |
|
|
2.50 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
Greater than .85 to 1 but less than or equal 1 |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
An ABR loan does not have a set maturity date and may be repaid at any time upon the Company
providing advance notification to the lenders under the Amended Credit Facility (the Lenders).
Interest is paid quarterly on ABR loans based on the number of days an ABR loan is outstanding as
of the last business day in March, June, September and December. The Company has the option to
convert an ABR loan to a LIBOR-based loan upon providing advance notification to the Lenders. The
minimum available loan term is one month and the maximum loan term is six months for LIBOR-based
loans. Interest for LIBOR loans is paid upon maturity of the loan term. Interim interest is paid
every three months for LIBOR loans that have loan terms that are greater than three months in
duration. At the end of a LIBOR loan term, the Amended Credit Facility allows the Company to elect
to continue a LIBOR loan with the same or a differing loan term or convert the borrowing to an ABR
loan.
On a quarterly basis, the Company also pays a 0.50% annualized commitment fee on the average
amount of borrowing base capacity not utilized during the quarter and fees calculated on the
average amount of letter of credit balances outstanding during the quarter.
10
The Amended Credit Facility contains covenants that include, among others:
|
|
|
a prohibition against incurring debt, subject to permitted exceptions; |
|
|
|
a prohibition against making dividends, distributions and redemptions, subject to
permitted exceptions; |
|
|
|
a prohibition against making investments, loans and advances, subject to permitted
exceptions; |
|
|
|
restrictions on creating liens and leases on the assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries, subject to permitted exceptions; |
|
|
|
restrictions on merging and selling assets outside the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
restrictions on use of proceeds, investments, transactions with affiliates or change of
principal business; |
|
|
|
a provision limiting oil and natural gas derivative financial instruments; |
|
|
|
a requirement that the Company not allow a ratio of Total Net Debt (as defined in the
Amended Credit Facility) to consolidated EBITDAX (as defined in the Amended Credit
Facility) to be greater than 4.0 to 1.0 for the four quarters ended on the last day of each
quarter; and |
|
|
|
a requirement that the Company maintain a Current Ratio (as defined in the Amended
Credit Facility) of consolidated current assets (with exclusions as described in the
Amended Credit Facility) to consolidated current liabilities (with exclusions as described
in the Amended Credit Facility) of not less than 1.0 to 1.0 as of the last day of any
fiscal quarter. |
The Amended Credit Facility contains customary events of default. If an event of default
occurs and is continuing, the Lenders may declare all amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit
Facility to be immediately due and payable.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had no borrowings and no outstanding letters of credit
issued under the Amended Credit Facility, resulting in an unused borrowing base capacity of $137.5
million. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants of the Amended Credit Facility
as of March 31, 2011.
Senior Unsecured Notes On February 2, 2011, the Company issued $400.0 million of 7.25%
senior unsecured notes (the Notes) due February 1, 2019. Interest is payable on the Notes
semi-annually in arrears on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2011. The Notes are
guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Companys material subsidiaries (Guarantors). These
guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several among the Guarantors. The issuance of
these Notes resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $390.0 million.
The Notes were issued under an Indenture, dated as of February 2, 2011 (the Base Indenture),
among the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the Trustee), as amended and
supplemented by the first supplemental indenture among the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee,
dated as of February 2, 2011 (the Supplemental Indenture; the Base Indenture, as amended and
supplemented by the Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture).
At any time prior to February 1, 2014, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the Notes at a
redemption price of 107.25% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the
redemption date, with the proceeds of certain equity offerings so long as the redemption occurs
within 180 days of completing such equity offering and at least 65% of the aggregate principal
amount of the Notes remains outstanding after such redemption. Prior to February 1, 2015, the
Company may redeem some or all of the Notes for cash at a redemption price equal to 100% of their
principal amount plus an applicable make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the
redemption date. On and after February 1, 2015, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes at
redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 103.625% for the
twelve-month period beginning on
February 1, 2015, 101.813% for the twelve-month period beginning February 1, 2016 and 100.00%
beginning on February 1, 2017, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
11
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company and Guarantors entered into a
Registration Rights Agreement that requires the Company and Guarantors to file a registration
statement with the SEC so the holders of the Notes can exchange the Notes for registered notes that
have substantially identical terms as the Notes. The Company and the Guarantors will use
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the exchange to be completed within 360 days after the
issuance of the Notes. Under certain circumstances, in lieu of a registered exchange offer, the Company
must use commercially reasonable efforts to file a shelf registration statement for the resale of the Notes.
If the Company fails to satisfy these obligations on a timely basis, the annual interest borne by the Notes
will be increased by up to 1.0% per annum until the exchange offer is completed or the shelf registration statement
is declared effective.
The Indenture restricts the Companys ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries
to: (i) incur additional debt or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (ii) pay distributions
on, redeem or repurchase, equity interests; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) incur liens; (v)
enter into transactions with affiliates; (vi) merge or consolidate with another company; and (vii)
transfer and sell assets. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and
qualifications. If at any time when the Notes are rated investment grade by both Moodys Investors
Service, Inc. and Standard & Poors Ratings Services and no Default (as defined in the Indenture)
has occurred and is continuing, many of such covenants will terminate and the Company and its
subsidiaries will cease to be subject to such covenants.
The Indenture contains customary events of default, including:
|
|
default in any payment of interest on any Note when due, continued for 30 days; |
|
|
|
default in the payment of principal of or premium, if any, on any Note when due; |
|
|
|
failure by the Company to comply with its other obligations under the
Indenture, in certain cases subject to notice and grace periods; |
|
|
|
payment defaults and accelerations with respect to other indebtedness of the
Company and its Restricted Subsidiaries (as defined in the Indenture) in the
aggregate principal amount of $10.0 million or more; |
|
|
|
certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the Company or a
Significant Subsidiary (as defined in the Indenture) or group of Restricted
Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary; |
|
|
|
failure by the Company or any Significant Subsidiary or group of Restricted
Subsidiaries that, taken together, would constitute a Significant Subsidiary to
pay certain final judgments aggregating in excess of $10.0 million within 60
days; and |
|
|
|
any guarantee of the Notes by a Guarantor ceases to be in full force and
effect, is declared null and void in a judicial proceeding or is denied or
disaffirmed by its maker. |
Deferred Financing Costs As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $1.7 million and $9.5
million of deferred financing costs, which are being amortized over the terms of the Amended Credit
Facility and the Notes, respectively. The deferred financing costs are included in Deferred costs
and other assets on the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2011. The
amortization of deferred financing costs is included in Interest expense on the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
8. Asset Retirement Obligations
The following table reflects the changes in the Companys ARO during the three months ended
March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ARO December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
7,640 |
|
Liabilities incurred during period |
|
|
435 |
|
Liabilities settled during period |
|
|
(19 |
) |
Accretion expense |
|
|
119 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
ARO March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
9,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
12
9. Income Taxes
Prior to its corporate reorganization in connection with the IPO (see Note 1), the Company was
a limited liability company and not subject to federal or state income tax (in most states).
Accordingly, no provision for federal or state income taxes was recorded prior to the corporate
reorganization as the Companys equity holders were responsible for income tax on the Companys
profits. In connection with the closing of the Companys IPO in June 2010, the Company merged into
a corporation and became subject to federal and state income taxes.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was 37.8%, which was
consistent with the statutory tax rate applicable to the U.S. and the blended state rate for the
states in which the Company conducts business. As of March 31, 2011, the Company did not have any
uncertain tax positions requiring adjustments to its tax liability.
The Company had deferred tax assets for its federal and state tax loss carryforwards at March
31, 2011 recorded in noncurrent deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation
allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of March 31, 2011, management determined that a
valuation allowance was not required for the tax loss carryforwards as they are expected to be
fully utilized before expiration.
10. Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income available to common
stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the periods presented. The
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the potential dilutive impact of
non-vested restricted shares outstanding during the periods presented, unless their effect is
anti-dilutive.
The following is a calculation of the basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,047 |
|
Dilution effect of stock awards at end of period(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
92,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Because the Company reported a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011, no
unvested stock awards were included in computing loss per share because the effect would be
anti-dilutive. |
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Obligations
The Companys total rental commitments under non-cancelable leases for office space and other
property and equipment were $5.8 million at March 31, 2011. On January 12, 2011, the
Company executed an amendment to its office
space lease agreement for an additional 11,638 square feet of space within its current office
building. Under the terms of the amendment, the Companys rental obligation for the new
premises commenced on May 1, 2011 and terminates on September 30, 2017 for an additional
obligation of $2.5 million.
Drilling Contracts As of March 31, 2011, the Company had three drilling rig contracts with
initial terms greater than one year. In the event of early contract termination under these
contracts, the Company would be obligated to pay approximately $17.0 million as of March 31, 2011
for the days remaining through the end of the primary terms of the contracts.
13
Volume Commitment Agreements As of March 31, 2011, the Company had certain agreements with
an aggregate requirement to deliver a minimum quantity of approximately 1.8 MMBbl and 3 Bcf from its West
Williston project area
within a specified timeframe. Future obligations under these
agreements are approximately $6.4 million as of March 31, 2011.
Fracturing Services On March 30, 2011, the Company entered into a master services agreement
with a third party service company for an initial term greater than one year. In the event of early
contract termination under this agreement, the Company would be obligated to pay approximately
$15.0 million as of March 31, 2011 for the months remaining through the end of the primary term of
the agreement.
Litigation The Company is party to various legal and/or regulatory proceedings from time to
time arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes all such matters are without
merit and involve amounts which, if resolved unfavorably, either individually or in the aggregate,
will not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
12. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated the period after the balance sheet date, noting no subsequent events
or transactions that required recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, other than as
noted below.
Derivative Instruments In April 2011, the Company entered into new three-way collar option
contracts, all of which settle monthly based on the West Texas Intermediate crude oil index price,
for a total notional amount of 122,500 barrels in 2011 and 366,000 barrels in 2012. These commodity
derivatives do not qualify for and were not designated as hedging instruments for accounting
purposes.
Volume Commitment Agreements In April 2011, the Company entered into additional marketing
agreements with requirements to deliver a minimum quantity of approximately 9.0 MMBbl from its West
Williston project area and 5.8 Bcf from its East Nesson project area within a specified timeframe.
The future obligation under these agreements is approximately $29.3 million.
14
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010 (2010 Annual Report), as well as the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. All statements, other than statements of
historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, regarding our strategy, future
operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans
and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, the words could, believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, expect, may,
continue, predict, potential, project and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying
words. In particular, the factors discussed below and detailed under Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
2010 Annual Report, could affect our actual results and cause our actual results to differ
materially from expectations, estimates, or assumptions expressed in, forecasted in, or implied in
such forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements may include statements about our:
|
|
|
cash flows and liquidity; |
|
|
|
financial strategy, budget, projections and operating results; |
|
|
|
oil and natural gas realized prices; |
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
availability of drilling, completion and production equipment; |
|
|
|
availability of qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future development costs; |
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital; |
|
|
|
drilling and completion of wells; |
|
|
|
gathering, transportation and marketing of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
exploitation or property acquisitions; |
|
|
|
costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting other operations; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
competition in the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
effectiveness of our risk management activities; |
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; |
|
|
|
counterparty credit risk; |
|
|
|
governmental regulation and taxation of the oil and natural gas industry; |
15
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries; |
|
|
|
uncertainty regarding our future operating results; |
|
|
|
estimated future net reserves and present value thereof; and |
|
|
|
plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this report that are not
historical. |
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. We disclaim any obligation to update or revise these statements unless required by Securities
law, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Although we
believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by the
forward-looking statements we make in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are reasonable, we can
give no assurance that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Some of the key
factors which could cause actual results to vary from our expectations include changes in oil and
natural gas prices, the timing of planned capital expenditures, availability of acquisitions,
uncertainties in estimating proved reserves and forecasting production results, operational factors
affecting the commencement or maintenance of producing wells, the condition of the capital markets
generally, as well as our ability to access them, the proximity to and capacity of transportation
facilities, and uncertainties regarding environmental regulations or litigation and other legal or
regulatory developments affecting our business, as well as those factors discussed below and
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, all of which are difficult to predict. In light of
these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed may not occur.
These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf.
Overview
We are an independent exploration and production company focused on the development and
acquisition of unconventional oil and natural gas resources primarily in the Williston Basin. Since
our inception, we have emphasized the acquisition of properties that provide current production and
significant upside potential through further development. Our drilling activity is primarily
directed toward projects that we believe can provide us with repeatable successes in the Bakken
formation.
Our use of capital for acquisitions and development allows us to direct our capital resources
to what we believe to be the most attractive opportunities as market conditions evolve. We have
historically acquired properties that we believe will meet or exceed our rate of return criteria.
For acquisitions of properties with additional development, exploitation and exploration potential,
we have focused on acquiring properties that we expect to operate so that we can control the timing
and implementation of capital spending. In some instances, we have acquired non-operated property
interests at what we believe to be attractive rates of return either because they provided a
foothold in a new area of interest or complemented our existing operations. We intend to continue
to acquire both operated and non-operated properties to the extent we believe they meet our return
objectives. In addition, our willingness to acquire non-operated properties in new areas provides
us with geophysical and geologic data that may lead to further acquisitions in the same area,
whether on an operated or non-operated basis.
Due to the geographic concentration of our oil and natural gas properties in the Williston
Basin, we believe the primary sources of opportunities, challenges and risks related to our
business for both the short and long-term are:
|
|
|
Commodity prices for oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
Commodity price differentials (difference between market index prices and actual
realized prices); |
|
|
|
Transportation capacity; and |
|
|
|
Availability and cost of services (primarily drilling and completion services). |
Our revenue, profitability and future growth rate depend substantially on factors beyond our
control, such as economic, political and regulatory developments as well as competition from other
sources of energy. Oil and natural gas prices historically have been volatile and may fluctuate
widely in the future. Sustained periods of low prices for oil or natural gas could materially and
adversely affect our financial position, our results of operations, the quantities of oil and
natural gas reserves that we can economically produce and our access to capital.
16
Prices for oil and natural gas can fluctuate significantly in response to relatively minor
changes in the global and regional supply of and demand for oil and natural gas. We enter into
crude oil sales contracts with purchasers who have access to crude oil transportation capacity,
utilize derivative financial instruments to manage our commodity price risk, and enter into
physical delivery contracts to manage our price differentials.
Our ability to develop and hold our existing undeveloped leasehold acreage is primarily
dependent upon having access to drilling rigs and completion services. The utilization of existing
drilling rigs and of existing completion service equipment in the Williston Basin is at an all-time
high. This has resulted in drilling rigs, completion equipment and crews being imported from Canada
and other parts of the United States. To ensure access to drilling rigs, we have entered into
fixed-term drilling rig contracts for periods of up to 2.5 years and currently have seven drilling
rigs under contract. We also enter into service contracts to ensure the availability of completion
services and the timely fracture stimulation of newly drilled wells. Our large concentrated acreage
position potentially provides a multi-year inventory of drilling projects and requires some forward
planning visibility for obtaining services.
First Quarter 2011 Highlights:
|
|
|
Completed and placed on production 23 gross wells (6.4 net wells) in the Bakken
and Three Forks formations; |
|
|
|
Drilling or in the process of completing 47 gross wells (20.6 net wells) in the
Bakken and Three Forks formations at March 31, 2011; |
|
|
|
Gross operated wells waiting on completion increased to 23 due to inclement
weather during the first quarter of 2011; |
|
|
|
Average daily production of 8,090 Boe per day during the three months ended March
31, 2011; |
|
|
|
Capital expenditures of $75.5 million, consisting primarily of $73.2 million in
drilling expenditures; |
|
|
|
Increased our borrowing base from $120 million to $137.5 million, as a result
of our semi-annual redetermination on January 21, 2010; and |
|
|
|
Issued $400.0 million of 7.25% senior unsecured notes due February 1, 2019. The
issuance of these notes resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $390.0 million,
which we are using to fund our exploration, development and acquisition program and for
general corporate purposes. |
Results of Operations
Revenues
Our revenues are derived from the sale of oil and natural gas production and do not include
the effects of derivatives instruments. Our revenues may vary significantly from period to period
as a result of changes in volumes of production sold or changes in commodity prices.
The following table summarizes our revenues and production data for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
Operating results (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
57,172 |
|
|
$ |
18,943 |
|
|
$ |
38,229 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas revenues |
|
|
58,744 |
|
|
|
20,068 |
|
|
|
38,676 |
|
Production data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls) |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Oil equivalents (MBoe) |
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
Average daily production (Boe/d) |
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
|
4,795 |
|
Average sales prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, without realized derivatives
(per Bbl) |
|
$ |
82.33 |
|
|
$ |
70.21 |
|
|
$ |
12.12 |
|
Oil, with realized derivatives (1) (per Bbl) |
|
|
81.59 |
|
|
|
70.12 |
|
|
|
11.47 |
|
Natural gas (per Mcf) |
|
|
7.78 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Realized prices include realized gains or losses on cash settlements for commodity
derivatives, which do not qualify for and were not designated as hedging instruments for
accounting purposes. |
17
Three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to three months ended March 31, 2010
Oil and natural gas revenues. Our oil and natural gas sales revenues increased $38.7 million,
or 193%, to $58.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2010. Our revenues are a function of oil and natural gas production volumes
sold and average sales prices received for those volumes. Average daily production sold increased
by 4,795 Boe per day, or 146%, to 8,090 Boe per day during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in average daily production sold
was primarily a result of our well completions during the last three quarters of 2010 and the first
quarter 2011. Well completions in our West Williston, East Nesson and Sanish project areas
increased average daily production by approximately 3,242 Boe per day, 1,458 Boe per day and 855 Boe per day, respectively, during the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the first quarter of
2010. The higher production amounts sold increased revenues by $35.3 million, and the remaining
$3.4 million increase in revenues was attributable to higher oil sales prices during the three
months ended March 31, 2011. Average oil sales prices, without realized derivatives, increased by
$12.12/Bbl, or 17%, to an average of $82.33/Bbl for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Expenses
The following table summarizes our operating expenses for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per Boe of production) |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
5,942 |
|
|
$ |
2,977 |
|
|
$ |
2,965 |
|
Production taxes |
|
|
6,083 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
4,173 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
13,812 |
|
|
|
5,849 |
|
|
|
7,963 |
|
Exploration expenses |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
(5,200 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
$ |
33,200 |
|
|
$ |
22,547 |
|
|
$ |
10,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
25,544 |
|
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
28,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
(31,154 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
(30,763 |
) |
Realized gain (loss) on derivative instruments |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(5,198 |
) |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(4,860 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
(36,552 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
(35,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(11,008 |
) |
|
|
(3,231 |
) |
|
|
(7,777 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(6,847 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,231 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expense (per Boe of production): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
8.16 |
|
|
$ |
10.04 |
|
|
$ |
(1.88 |
) |
Production taxes |
|
|
8.35 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
18.97 |
|
|
|
19.73 |
|
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.54 |
|
|
|
(17.54 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
8.17 |
|
|
|
11.86 |
|
|
|
(3.69 |
) |
18
Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to three months ended March 31, 2010
Lease operating expenses. Lease operating expenses increased $3.0 million to $5.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase
was due to an increased number of producing wells and increased water production period over
period. The 146% increase in production volumes from the three months ended March 31, 2010 to the
three months ended March 31, 2011 resulted in a 19% decrease in unit operating expenses from $10.04
to $8.16 per Boe.
Production taxes. Our production taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were
10.4% and 9.5%, respectively, as a percentage of oil and natural gas sales. The 2011 production tax
rate was higher than the 2010 production tax rate due to an increased portion of our oil revenues
subject to taxation in North Dakota, which imposes an 11.5% production tax rate.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A). Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
increased $8.0 million to $13.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in DD&A expense for the three months ended March
31, 2011 was primarily due to the 146% production increase. The DD&A rate for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 was $18.97 per Boe compared to $19.73 per Boe for the three months ended March
31, 2010. The lower DD&A rate was due to the lower cost of reserve additions associated with our
2010 acquisitions and drilling activities.
Impairment of oil and gas properties. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we
recorded non-cash impairment charges of $1.4 million and $3.1 million, respectively, for unproved
property leases that expired during the period. No impairment charges of proved oil and gas
properties were recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Stock-based compensation expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded a $5.2
million non-cash charge for stock-based compensation expense associated with OPMs grant of 1.0
million Class C Unit Interests (C Units). The C Units were granted on March 24, 2010 to
individuals who were employed by us as of February 1, 2010 and who were not executive officers or
key employees with an existing capital investment in OPM. The C Units were membership interests in
OPM and not direct interests in us. The C Units were non-transferable, had no voting power and
vested immediately on the grant date. Based on the characteristics of these awards, we concluded
that they represented equity-type awards and we accounted for the value of these awards as if they
had been awarded by us. We used fair-value-based methods to determine the value of stock-based
compensation awarded to our employees and recognized the entire amount as expense due to the
immediate vesting of the awards, with no future requisite service period required by the employees.
As of December 31, 2010, OPM had distributed substantially all cash or requisite common stock to
its members based on membership interests and distribution percentages. No stock-based compensation
expense was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to the C Units.
General and administrative expenses. Our general and administrative expenses increased $2.4 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $3.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010. Of this increase, approximately $1.1 million was due to the impact of our organizational
growth on employee compensation and $0.5 million was due to the amortization of our restricted
stock awards for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The remaining increase was primarily due to
additional costs related to being a public entity. As of March 31, 2011, we had 70 full-time
employees compared to 31 full-time employees as of March 31, 2010.
Derivative instruments. As a result of our derivative activities, we incurred cash settlement
losses of $0.5 million and $26 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. In addition, as a result of forward oil price increases, we recognized $31.2 million
and $0.4 million of non-cash unrealized mark-to-market derivative losses during the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased $4.9
million to $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2010. The increase was the result of interest related to our senior unsecured notes
issued in February 2011 at an interest rate of 7.25%. There were no borrowings under our revolving
credit facility during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to a weighted average
outstanding debt balance of $12.9 million at a weighted average interest rate of 10.6% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010.
19
Income taxes. Prior to our corporate reorganization, we were a limited liability company not
subject to entity-level income tax. Accordingly, no provision for federal or state corporate income
taxes was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as our taxable income was allocated
directly to our equity holders. In connection with the closing of our IPO in June 2010, we merged
into a corporation and became subject to federal and state entity-level taxation. Our income tax
benefit was $4.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, resulting in an effective tax
rate of 37.8%. Our effective tax rate is expected to continue to closely resemble the statutory
rate applicable to the U.S. and the blended state rate of the states in which we conduct business.
At March 31, 2011, we had deferred tax assets for our federal and state tax loss carryforwards
recorded in noncurrent deferred taxes. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance
when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of March 31, 2011, management determined that a
valuation allowance was not required for the tax loss carryforwards as they are expected to be
fully utilized before expiration.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity as of the date of this report have been proceeds from our IPO
in June 2010, proceeds from our private placement of senior unsecured notes in February 2011,
borrowings under our revolving credit facility, cash flows from operations and capital
contributions from private investors prior to our IPO. Our primary use of capital has been for the
acquisition, development and exploration of oil and natural gas properties. We continually monitor
potential capital sources, including equity and debt financings, in order to meet our planned
capital expenditures and liquidity requirements. Our future success in growing proved reserves and
production will be highly dependent on our ability to access outside sources of capital.
Our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
22,845 |
|
|
$ |
7,702 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(200,789 |
) |
|
|
(32,241 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
389,414 |
|
|
|
(13,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
211,470 |
|
|
$ |
(37,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities
Our cash flows depend on many factors, including the price of oil and natural gas and the
success of our development and exploration activities as well as future acquisitions. We actively
manage our exposure to commodity price fluctuations by executing derivative transactions to
mitigate the change in oil prices on a portion of our production, thereby mitigating our exposure
to oil price declines, but these transactions may also limit our earnings potential in periods of
rising oil prices.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $22.8 million and $7.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in cash flows provided by
operating activities for the period ended March 31, 2011 as compared to 2010 was primarily the
result of an increase in oil and natural gas production of 146%. In addition, at March 31, 2011, we
had a working capital surplus of $462.5 million. This surplus was primarily attributable to our
cash balance as a result of the net proceeds from the issuance of our senior unsecured notes in
February 2011.
Cash flows used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $200.8 million and $32.2 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 2010 of $168.6 million was
attributable to increased levels of capital expenditures for drilling, development and acquisition
costs.
20
Our capital expenditures for drilling, development and acquisition costs are summarized in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Project Area: |
|
|
|
|
West Williston |
|
$ |
61,314 |
|
East Nesson |
|
|
9,787 |
|
Sanish |
|
|
4,407 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total(2) |
|
$ |
75,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents data relating to our properties in the Barnett shale. |
|
(2) |
|
Capital expenditures reflected in the table above differ from the amounts shown in the
statement of cash flows in our condensed consolidated financial statements because amounts
reflected in the table above include changes in accrued liabilities from the previous
reporting period for capital expenditures, while the amounts presented in the statement of
cash flows are presented on a cash basis. The capital expenditures amount presented in the
statement of cash flows also includes cash paid for other property and equipment as well as
cash paid for asset retirement obligations. |
Our total 2011 exploration and production capital expenditure budget is $490 million,
which consists of:
|
|
|
$402 million for drilling and completing operated wells; |
|
|
|
$39 million for drilling and completing non-operated wells; |
|
|
|
$19 million for maintaining and expanding our leasehold position; |
|
|
|
$21 million for constructing infrastructure to support production in our core project
areas; and |
|
|
|
$9 million for micro-seismic work, purchasing seismic data and other test work. |
While we have budgeted $490 million for these purposes, the ultimate amount of capital we will
expend may fluctuate materially based on market conditions and the success of our drilling and
operations results as the year progresses. We believe that the net proceeds from our private
offering of senior unsecured notes of approximately $390.0 million, which closed on February 2,
2011, together with cash on hand and cash flows from operating activities should be more than
sufficient to fund our 2011 capital expenditure budget. However, because the operated wells funded
by our 2011 drilling plan represent only a small percentage of our gross identified drilling
locations, we will be required to generate or raise multiples of this amount of capital to develop
our entire inventory of identified drilling locations should we elect to do so.
Our capital budget may be adjusted as business conditions warrant. The amount, timing and
allocation of capital expenditures is largely discretionary and within our control. If oil and
natural gas prices decline or costs increase significantly, we could defer a significant portion of
our budgeted capital expenditures until later periods to prioritize capital projects that we
believe have the highest expected returns and potential to generate near-term cash flows. We
routinely monitor and adjust our capital expenditures in response to changes in prices,
availability of financing, drilling and acquisition costs, industry conditions, the timing of
regulatory approvals, the availability of rigs, success or lack of success in drilling activities,
contractual obligations, internally generated cash flows and other factors both within and outside
our control.
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $389.4 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011, which was primarily provided by the net proceeds from the issuance of our senior
unsecured notes in February 2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net cash used in
financing activities was $13.4 million, which primarily related to repayments of our borrowings
under our revolving credit facility.
Senior Secured Revolving Line of Credit. On January 21, 2011, we amended our credit facility
(Amended Credit Facility), which increased our borrowing base to $600.0 million and extended the
maturity date to February 2015. Borrowings under the Amended Credit Facility are collateralized by
perfected first priority liens and security
interests on substantially all of our assets, including mortgage liens on oil and natural gas
properties having at least 80% of the reserve value as determined by reserve reports. At our
election, interest is generally determined by reference to (i) the London interbank offered rate,
or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 2.00% and 2.75% per annum; or (ii) a domestic bank
prime rate plus an applicable margin between 0.50% and 1.25% per annum.
21
The Amended Credit Facility provides for semi-annual redeterminations on April 1 and October 1
of each year. In connection with the most recent amendment to our revolving credit facility, a
redetermination of our borrowing base was completed at our request on January 21, 2011 in lieu of
the scheduled April 1, 2011 semi-annual redetermination. As a result of this redetermination, our
borrowing base increased from $120 million to $150 million, and was then automatically reduced to
$137.5 million in connection with the issuance of our senior unsecured notes on February 2, 2011
(described below). As of March 31, 2011, we had no borrowings and no outstanding letters of credit
under the Amended Credit Facility.
The Amended Credit Facility also contains certain financial covenants and customary events of
default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing, the lenders under our Amended Credit
Facility may declare all amounts outstanding under the Amended Credit Facility to be immediately
due and payable. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with the financial covenants of the
Amended Credit Facility.
Senior Unsecured Notes. On February 2, 2011, we issued $400.0 million of 7.25% senior
unsecured notes due February 1, 2019 (the Notes). Interest is payable on the notes semi-annually
in arrears on each February 1 and August 1, commencing August 1, 2011. These notes are guaranteed
on a senior unsecured basis by our material subsidiaries. The issuance of these notes resulted in
net proceeds to us of approximately $390.0 million which we are using to fund our exploration,
development and acquisition program and for general corporate purposes.
The Notes were issued under an Indenture (the Base Indenture), among the Company and U.S.
Bank National Association, as trustee (the Trustee), as amended and supplemented by the first
supplemental indenture among the Company, the Guarantors and the Trustee, dated as of February 2,
2011 (the Supplemental Indenture; the Base Indenture, as amended and supplemented by the
Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture).
The Indenture restricts the Companys ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries
to: (i) incur additional debt or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; (ii) pay distributions
on, redeem or repurchase, equity interests; (iii) make certain investments; (iv) incur liens; (v)
enter into transactions with affiliates; (vi) merge or consolidate with another company; and (vii)
transfer and sell assets. These covenants are subject to a number of important exceptions and
qualifications. If at any time when the Notes are rated investment grade by both Moodys Investors
Service, Inc. and Standard & Poors Ratings Services and no Default (as defined in the Indenture)
has occurred and is continuing, many of such covenants will terminate and the Company and its
subsidiaries will cease to be subject to such covenants. The Indenture also contains customary
events of default.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
See Note 5 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of
our derivative instruments and related fair value measurement. See also Item 3. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk below.
Contractual Obligations
We have the following contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2011 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
3-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
$ |
5,813 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
1,792 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,344 |
|
Drilling rig commitments (1) |
|
|
16,990 |
|
|
|
10,070 |
|
|
|
6,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume commitment agreements (1) |
|
|
6,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fracturing service agreements (1) |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes (2) |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Asset retirement obligations (3) |
|
|
9,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
7,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
453,539 |
|
|
$ |
19,963 |
|
|
$ |
17,517 |
|
|
$ |
7,446 |
|
|
$ |
408,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
description of our operating leases, drilling rig commitments, volume commitment agreements and fracturing
service agreements. |
|
(2) |
|
See Note 7 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a
description of our senior unsecured notes. As of March 31, 2011, we had no balance
outstanding under our Amended Credit Facility. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts represent our estimate of future asset retirement obligations on an
undiscounted basis. Because
these costs typically extend many years into the future, estimating these future costs
requires management
to make estimates and judgments that are subject to future revisions based upon numerous
factors, including
the rate of inflation, changing technology and the political and regulatory environment. See
Note 8 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates from
those disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report other than those noted below.
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company invests in certain money market funds, commercial paper and time deposits, all of
which are stated at fair value. The Company classifies all such investments with original maturity
dates less than 90 days as cash equivalents. The Company classifies all such investments with
original maturity dates greater than 90 days as held-to-maturity securities based on managements
intentions to hold the investments to their maturity date.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock shares represent shares withheld by the Company to pay tax withholding
obligations of certain employees upon the vesting of restricted stock awards. These shares are not
part of a publicly announced program to repurchase shares of the Companys common stock and are
accounted for at cost. The Company does not have a publicly announced program to repurchase shares
of common stock.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The following market risk disclosures should be read in conjunction with the quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk contained in our 2010 Annual Report, as well as with the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
We are exposed to a variety of market risks including commodity price risk, interest rate risk
and counterparty and customer risk. We address these risks through a program of risk management,
including the use of derivative instruments.
Commodity price exposure risk. We are exposed to market risk as the prices of oil and natural
gas fluctuate as a result of changes in supply and demand and other factors. To partially reduce
price risk caused by these market fluctuations, we have entered into derivative instruments in the
past and expect to enter into derivative instruments in the future to cover a significant portion
of our future production.
23
We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage risks related to changes in oil prices.
As of March 31, 2011, we utilized two-way and three-way collar options to reduce the volatility of
oil prices on a significant portion of our future expected oil production. A two-way collar is a
combination of options: a sold call and a purchased put. The purchased put establishes a minimum
price (floor) and the sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) we will receive for the
volumes under contract. A three-way collar is a combination of options: a sold call, a purchased
put and a sold put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor), unless the market price
falls below the sold put (sub-floor), at which point the minimum price would be NYMEX-WTI plus the
difference between the purchased put and the sold put strike price. The sold call establishes a
maximum price (ceiling) we will receive for the volumes under contract.
We record all derivative instruments at fair value. The credit standing of our counterparties
is analyzed and factored into the fair value amounts recognized on the balance sheet. Derivative
assets and liabilities arising from our derivative contracts with the same counterparty are also
reported on a net basis, as all counterparty contracts provide for net settlement.
The following is a summary of our derivative contracts as of March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement |
|
Derivative |
|
Amount of |
|
|
Sub-Floor |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fair Value Asset |
|
Period |
|
Instrument |
|
Oil (Barrels) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Floor Price |
|
|
Ceiling Price |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
1,662,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82.66 |
|
|
$ |
100.60 |
|
|
|
(17,139 |
) |
2011 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
65.00 |
|
|
$ |
82.50 |
|
|
$ |
101.39 |
|
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
2012 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
1,024,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
84.58 |
|
|
$ |
102.52 |
|
|
|
(9,957 |
) |
2012 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
1,036,000 |
|
|
$ |
64.19 |
|
|
$ |
84.12 |
|
|
$ |
107.97 |
|
|
|
(8,628 |
) |
2013 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
411,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89.06 |
|
|
$ |
106.40 |
|
|
|
(1,749 |
) |
2013 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
427,000 |
|
|
$ |
68.73 |
|
|
$ |
88.73 |
|
|
$ |
119.34 |
|
|
|
(1,380 |
) |
2014 |
|
Two-Way Collars |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
$ |
107.20 |
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
2014 |
|
Three-Way Collars |
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
$ |
70.00 |
|
|
$ |
90.00 |
|
|
$ |
122.45 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(41,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk. We had $400.0 million of senior unsecured notes outstanding at March 31,
2011, which have a fixed cash interest rate of 7.25% per annum. During the first quarter of 2011,
we had no indebtedness outstanding under our revolving credit facility. We may utilize interest
rate derivatives to alter interest rate exposure in an attempt to reduce interest rate expense
related to existing debt issued under our revolving credit facility. Interest rate derivatives
would be used solely to modify interest rate exposure and not to modify the overall leverage of the
debt portfolio.
Counterparty and customer credit risk. Joint interest receivables arise from billing entities
which own partial interest in the wells we operate. These entities participate in our wells
primarily based on their ownership in leases on which we choose to drill. We have limited ability to
control participation in our wells. We are also subject to credit risk due to concentration of our
oil and natural gas receivables with several significant customers. The inability or failure of our
significant customers to meet their obligations to us or their insolvency or liquidation may
adversely affect our financial results. In addition, our oil and natural gas derivative
arrangements expose us to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. However, in
order to mitigate the risk of nonperformance, we only enter into derivative contracts with
counterparties that are high credit-quality financial institutions, all of which are lenders under
our revolving credit facility. This risk is also managed by spreading our derivative exposure
across several institutions and limiting the hedged volumes placed under individual contracts.
While we do not require all of our customers to post collateral and we do not have a formal
process in place to evaluate and assess the credit standing of our significant customers for oil
and natural gas receivables and the counterparties on our derivative instruments, we do evaluate
the credit standing of such counterparties as we deem appropriate under the circumstances. This
evaluation may include reviewing a counterpartys credit rating, latest financial information and,
in the case of a customer with which we have receivables, their historical payment record, the
financial ability of the customers parent company to make payment if the customer cannot and
undertaking the due diligence necessary to determine credit terms and credit limits. Several of our
significant customers for oil and
natural gas receivables have a credit rating below investment grade or do not have rated debt
securities. In these circumstances, we have considered the lack of investment grade credit rating
in addition to the other factors described above.
24
The counterparties on our derivative instruments currently in place are lenders under our
revolving credit facility with investment grade ratings. We are likely to enter into any future
derivative instruments with these or other lenders under our revolving credit facility, which also
carry investment grade ratings. Furthermore, the agreements with each of the counterparties on our
derivative instruments contain netting provisions. As a result of these netting provisions, our
maximum amount of loss due to credit risk is limited to the net amounts due to and from the
counterparties under the derivative contracts.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Prior to the completion of our
IPO, we were a private company with limited accounting personnel to adequately execute our
accounting processes and other supervisory resources with which to address our internal control
over financial reporting. As previously discussed in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures of our 2010
Annual Report, we did not maintain an effective control environment in that the design and
execution of our controls did not consistently result in effective review and supervision by
individuals with financial reporting oversight roles. The lack of adequate staffing levels resulted
in insufficient time spent on review and approval of certain information used to prepare our
financial statements, which resulted in certain control deficiencies. We concluded that these
control deficiencies constituted a material weakness in our control environment.
Remediation Activities. Although remediation efforts are still in progress, management has
taken steps to address the cause of the material weakness by putting into place new accounting
processes and control procedures. In addition, we have hired additional accounting and financial
reporting staff since our IPO, implemented additional analysis and reconciliation procedures and
increased the levels of review and approval. Additionally, we have begun taking steps to
comprehensively document and analyze our system of internal control over financial reporting in
preparation for our first management report on internal control over financial reporting required
in connection with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Management will continue to evaluate the design and effectiveness of these control changes in
conjunction with its ongoing evaluation, review, formalization and testing of our internal control
environment over the remainder of 2011. We will not complete our review until after this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q is filed. We cannot predict the outcome of our review at this time. During the
course of the review, we may identify additional control deficiencies, which could give rise to
additional significant deficiencies and other material weaknesses.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Exchange Act, we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2011. Our disclosure controls
and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. In
light of the previously identified material weakness described above, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were not effective at the reasonable assurance level as of March 31, 2011. Notwithstanding the
existence of the material weakness, management concluded that the financial statements and other
financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for all periods
presented.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. As our remediation efforts are still in
progress, as described above, there were changes in our system of internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred
during the three months ended March 31, 2011
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
25
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
See Part I, Item 1, Note 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
entitled Commitments and Contingencies, which is incorporated in this item by reference.
Our business faces many risks. Any of the risks discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our
other SEC filings could have a material impact on our business, financial position or results of
operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently
believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations.
For a discussion of our potential risks and uncertainties, see the information in Item 1A.
Risk Factors in our 2010 Annual Report.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Unregistered sales of securities. There were no sales of unregistered equity securities during
the period covered by this report.
Issuer purchases of equity securities. The following table contains information about our
acquisition of equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Paid |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
Shares that May Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased (1) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
Under the Plans or Programs |
|
January 1, 2011 to
January 31, 2011 |
|
|
20,595 |
|
|
$ |
27.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1,
2011 to February
28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2011
to March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
20,595 |
|
|
$ |
27.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represent shares that employees surrendered back to the Company that equaled in value
the amount of taxes needed for tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted
stock awards. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Oasis Petroleum
Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
on June 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Oasis Petroleum Inc. (filed as Exhibit
3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on June 24, 2010, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A on May 19, 2010, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Indenture dated as of February 2, 2011 among the Company and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2, 2011, and incorporated herein
by reference). |
26
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
4.3 |
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 2, 2011 among the Company,
the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2,
2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 2, 2011 among the
Company, the Guarantors and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as
representative of the several initial purchasers (filed as Exhibit 4.3
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2, 2011, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Purchase Agreement dated as of January 28, 2011 among the Company, the
Guarantors and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the
several initial purchasers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2, 2011, and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Limited
Waiver, dated as of January 21, 2011, among Oasis Petroleum North
America LLC, as borrower, Oasis Petroleum LLC and Oasis Petroleum Inc.,
as guarantors, BNP Paribas, as administrative agent, and the lenders
party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K on January 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated February 15, 2011, between Oasis
Petroleum Inc. and Ted Collins, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on February 18, 2011, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(b) |
|
Furnished herewith. |
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OASIS PETROLEUM INC.
|
|
Date: May 13, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Thomas B. Nusz
|
|
|
|
Thomas B. Nusz |
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Roy W. Mace
|
|
|
|
Roy W. Mace |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
28
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Oasis Petroleum
Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
on June 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Oasis Petroleum Inc. (filed as Exhibit
3.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on June 24, 2010, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1/A on May 19, 2010, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Indenture dated as of February 2, 2011 among the Company and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2, 2011, and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 2, 2011 among the Company,
the Guarantors and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2,
2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 2, 2011 among the
Company, the Guarantors and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as
representative of the several initial purchasers (filed as Exhibit 4.3
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2, 2011, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Purchase Agreement dated as of January 28, 2011 among the Company, the
Guarantors and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the
several initial purchasers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K on February 2, 2011, and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Limited
Waiver, dated as of January 21, 2011, among Oasis Petroleum North
America LLC, as borrower, Oasis Petroleum LLC and Oasis Petroleum Inc.,
as guarantors, BNP Paribas, as administrative agent, and the lenders
party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K on January 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Indemnification Agreement, dated February 15, 2011, between Oasis
Petroleum Inc. and Ted Collins, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on February 18, 2011, and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
(a) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
(b) |
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 906 certification of Principal Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(b) |
|
Furnished herewith. |
29