e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
Or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-31719
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-4204626 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
200 Oceangate, Suite 100 |
|
|
Long Beach, California
|
|
90802 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(562) 435-3666
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the issuers Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as
of October 24, 2008, was approximately 26,926,000.
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC.
Index
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements.
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per-share data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
382,436 |
|
|
$ |
459,064 |
|
Investments |
|
|
163,676 |
|
|
|
242,855 |
|
Receivables |
|
|
169,760 |
|
|
|
111,537 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
14,172 |
|
|
|
8,616 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
14,402 |
|
|
|
12,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
744,446 |
|
|
|
834,593 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
64,633 |
|
|
|
49,555 |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
|
|
200,783 |
|
|
|
207,223 |
|
Investments |
|
|
63,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
36,510 |
|
|
|
29,019 |
|
Receivable for ceded life and annuity contracts |
|
|
27,828 |
|
|
|
29,240 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
19,846 |
|
|
|
21,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,157,873 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical claims and benefits payable |
|
$ |
298,787 |
|
|
$ |
311,606 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
70,918 |
|
|
|
69,266 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
19,153 |
|
|
|
40,104 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
7,755 |
|
|
|
5,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
396,613 |
|
|
|
426,922 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
6,598 |
|
|
|
10,136 |
|
Liability for ceded life and annuity contracts |
|
|
27,828 |
|
|
|
29,240 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
18,740 |
|
|
|
14,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
649,779 |
|
|
|
680,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 80,000 shares
authorized, outstanding 27,393 shares at
September 30, 2008 and 28,444 shares at
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 20,000
shares authorized, no shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
163,648 |
|
|
|
185,808 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(4,537 |
) |
|
|
272 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
371,617 |
|
|
|
324,760 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,292 shares at
September 30, 2008 and 1,201 shares at
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(22,661 |
) |
|
|
(20,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
508,094 |
|
|
|
490,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,157,873 |
|
|
$ |
1,171,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net income per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
791,554 |
|
|
$ |
628,402 |
|
|
$ |
2,282,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,791,764 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
17,517 |
|
|
|
21,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
796,329 |
|
|
|
636,034 |
|
|
|
2,299,862 |
|
|
|
1,812,825 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical care costs |
|
|
669,355 |
|
|
|
525,902 |
|
|
|
1,936,531 |
|
|
|
1,519,244 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
88,030 |
|
|
|
74,235 |
|
|
|
253,196 |
|
|
|
204,831 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
8,515 |
|
|
|
7,082 |
|
|
|
24,997 |
|
|
|
20,274 |
|
Impairment charge on purchased software |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
765,900 |
|
|
|
607,219 |
|
|
|
2,214,724 |
|
|
|
1,745,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
30,429 |
|
|
|
28,815 |
|
|
|
85,138 |
|
|
|
67,694 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,980 |
) |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(6,559 |
) |
|
|
(2,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
28,449 |
|
|
|
28,285 |
|
|
|
78,579 |
|
|
|
65,314 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,263 |
|
|
|
10,772 |
|
|
|
31,722 |
|
|
|
24,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,186 |
|
|
$ |
17,513 |
|
|
$ |
46,857 |
|
|
$ |
40,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
27,449 |
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
|
|
27,971 |
|
|
|
28,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
28,441 |
|
|
|
28,087 |
|
|
|
28,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,186 |
|
|
$ |
17,513 |
|
|
$ |
46,857 |
|
|
$ |
40,419 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments |
|
|
(1,562 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(4,809 |
) |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(1,562 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
(4,809 |
) |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
15,624 |
|
|
$ |
17,765 |
|
|
$ |
42,048 |
|
|
$ |
40,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
46,857 |
|
|
$ |
40,419 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,997 |
|
|
|
20,274 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(6,135 |
) |
|
|
(4,139 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
5,769 |
|
|
|
5,238 |
|
Tax provision from employee stock compensation recorded as additional paid-in capital |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(58,223 |
) |
|
|
(13,310 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(1,881 |
) |
|
|
(2,161 |
) |
Medical claims and benefits payable |
|
|
(12,819 |
) |
|
|
18,674 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
14,283 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(20,951 |
) |
|
|
23,923 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
8,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(20,271 |
) |
|
|
112,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of equipment |
|
|
(28,314 |
) |
|
|
(16,514 |
) |
Purchases of investments |
|
|
(181,377 |
) |
|
|
(85,252 |
) |
Sales and maturities of investments |
|
|
188,896 |
|
|
|
59,292 |
|
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(7,491 |
) |
|
|
(7,608 |
) |
Cash paid in business purchase transaction |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
(2,921 |
) |
Increase in other long-term liabilities |
|
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
6,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(25,653 |
) |
|
|
(46,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(32,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of amounts borrowed under credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
Payment of credit facility fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(551 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from employee stock compensation |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchases |
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(30,704 |
) |
|
|
(22,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(76,628 |
) |
|
|
43,944 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
459,064 |
|
|
|
403,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
382,436 |
|
|
$ |
447,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
36,127 |
|
|
$ |
15,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
3,945 |
|
|
$ |
2,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments |
|
$ |
(7,833 |
) |
|
$ |
720 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
3,024 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (loss) gain on investments |
|
$ |
(4,809 |
) |
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of common stock used for stock-based compensation |
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued purchases of equipment |
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of treasury stock |
|
$ |
29,966 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of business purchase transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired |
|
$ |
(2,262 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Common stock issued to seller |
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid in business purchase transaction |
|
$ |
(1,000 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business purchase transactions adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1,265 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation
Organization and Operations
Molina Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) is a multi-state managed care organization
participating exclusively in government-sponsored health care programs for low-income persons, such
as the Medicaid program and the State Childrens Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP. We also serve
a small number of members who are dually eligible under both the Medicaid and the Medicare
programs, and commencing in January 2007 we began to serve a small number of low-income Medicare
members. We conduct our business primarily through nine licensed health plans in the states of
California, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Washington. The health
plans are locally operated by our respective wholly owned subsidiaries in those nine states, each
of which is licensed as a health maintenance organization, or HMO. See Note 10, Subsequent
Events, regarding our Florida health plan.
Our results of operations include the results of the November 1, 2007 acquisition of Mercy
CarePlus, a Medicaid managed care organization based in St. Louis, Missouri.
Consolidated and Interim Financial Information
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all
majority owned subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for
a fair presentation of the results as of the date and for the interim periods presented, which
consist solely of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated results
of income for the current interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results for the
entire year ending December 31, 2008. Financial information related to subsidiaries acquired during
any year is included only for the period subsequent to their acquisition.
The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared under the
assumption that users of the interim financial data have either read or have access to our audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. Accordingly, certain
disclosures that would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the December 31, 2007
audited consolidated financial statements have been omitted. These unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our December 31, 2007 audited
financial statements. Certain 2007 amounts in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows
regarding stock-based compensation have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Earnings Per Share
The denominators for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
|
Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period |
|
|
27,453 |
|
|
|
28,284 |
|
|
|
28,444 |
|
|
|
28,119 |
|
Weighted average number of treasury shares
purchased |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares issued under
employee stock plans |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share |
|
|
27,449 |
|
|
|
28,306 |
|
|
|
27,971 |
|
|
|
28,229 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options and
restricted stock |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
27,582 |
|
|
|
28,441 |
|
|
|
28,087 |
|
|
|
28,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Stock-Based Compensation
At September 30, 2008, we had employee equity incentives outstanding under two plans: (1) the
2002 Equity Incentive Plan; and (2) the 2000 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan (from which equity
incentives are no longer awarded). We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. Restricted
stock awards are valued based on the closing market price of our common stock on the grant date.
The Black-Scholes valuation model is used to estimate the fair value of stock options as of the
grant date. For both restricted stock and stock option awards, the expense is recognized over the
vesting period, generally straight-line over four years.
Charged to general and administrative expenses, total stock-based compensation expense (net of
tax at the combined federal and state statutory tax rate) for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Stock options (including shares issued under our
employee stock purchase plan) |
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
1,291 |
|
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax |
|
$ |
1,354 |
|
|
$ |
989 |
|
|
$ |
3,577 |
|
|
$ |
3,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options totaled
$2.1 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years. Also as of
September 30, 2008, unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards totaled
$15.5 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years.
We used the following assumptions in the Black-Scholes valuation model for options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008(1) |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
45.3 |
% |
|
|
48.2 |
% |
Expected option term (in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
Grant date weighted-average fair value per share |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.05 |
|
|
$ |
12.80 |
|
|
$ |
16.30 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There were no stock options awarded in the three months ended September 30, 2008; 12,000 stock
options have been awarded during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. |
Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
733,713 |
|
|
$ |
30.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
33.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(16,921 |
) |
|
$ |
27.75 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(46,653 |
) |
|
$ |
34.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
682,139 |
|
|
$ |
30.30 |
|
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable and expected to vest as
of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
638,584 |
|
|
$ |
30.19 |
|
|
$ |
1,736 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
430,454 |
|
|
$ |
29.77 |
|
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Restricted stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Unvested balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
|
235,413 |
|
|
$ |
34.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
383,500 |
|
|
|
30.96 |
|
|
$ |
11,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(76,571 |
) |
|
|
32.25 |
|
|
$ |
2,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(53,662 |
) |
|
|
33.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested balance as of September 30, 2008 |
|
|
488,680 |
|
|
$ |
31.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Charge
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an impairment charge of $782,000 was recorded
related to commercial software no longer used for operations. No such charge occurred during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position APB
14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(Including Partial Cash Settlement) (the FSP). The FSP requires the proceeds from the issuance of
such convertible debt instruments to be allocated between a liability component and an equity
component. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the period the convertible debt is
expected to be outstanding, as additional non-cash interest expense. The change in accounting
treatment is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and shall be applied
retrospectively to prior periods. The FSP changes the accounting treatment for our $200.0 million
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014, which were issued in October 2007 (see Note 6, Long-Term
Debt). The impact of this new accounting treatment will result in an increase to non-cash interest
expense beginning in fiscal year 2009 for financial statements covering past and future periods.
Assuming a 7.9% interest rate, we have estimated the incremental impact of the FSP to our results
of operations in 2009 to be $3.4 million, or $0.13 per diluted share, net of tax. This estimate
assumes a 38% combined federal and state statutory tax rate and 27 million diluted shares
outstanding. We estimate the retroactive adjustment for prior periods will be approximately $0.8
million, or $0.02 per diluted share, net of tax, for 2007, and $2.9 million, or $0.10 per diluted
share, net of tax, for 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R), Business Combinations and SFAS 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. The standards are intended to
improve, simplify, and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the
reporting of noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements. SFAS 141(R)
requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as
the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the
acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and
understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is
on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited.
SFAS 160 is designed to improve the
relevance, comparability, and transparency of financial information provided to investors by
requiring all entities to report minority interests in subsidiaries in the same wayas equity in
the consolidated financial statements. Moreover, SFAS 160 eliminates the diversity that currently
exists in accounting for transactions between an entity and minority interests by requiring they be
treated as equity transactions. In addition, SFAS 160 requires that a
parent company recognize a gain or loss in net income when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated upon a change in control. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. In
addition, SFAS 160 shall be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which
it is initially applied, except for the presentation and disclosure requirements. The presentation
and disclosure requirements shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. As of
September 30, 2008, we did not have material outstanding minority interests.
9
Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task
Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material
impact on our present or future consolidated financial statements.
3. Fair Value Measurements
As of September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $382.4 million, investments
totaling $227.5 million, and restricted investments of $36.5 million. The cash equivalents consist
of highly liquid securities with original or purchase date remaining maturities of up to three
months that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash. Our investments consisted of
investment grade debt securities and are designated as available-for-sale. Of the $227.5 million
total, $163.7 million are classified as current assets, and $63.8 million are classified as
non-current assets (see further discussion below). Our investment policies require that all of our
investments have final maturities of ten years or less (excluding auction rate and variable rate
securities where interest rates are periodically reset) and that the average maturity be four years
or less. The restricted investments, classified as non-current assets and designated as
held-to-maturity, consist of interest-bearing deposits and U.S. treasury securities required by the
respective states in which we operate. Investments and restricted investments are subject to
interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market rates increase. All non-restricted
investments are reported at fair market value on the balance sheet. All restricted investments are
carried at amortized cost, which approximates market value. We have the ability to hold these
restricted investments until maturity and, as a result, we would not expect the value of these
investments to decline significantly due to a sudden change in market interest rates. Declines in
interest rates over time will reduce our investment income.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We
adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008 for our financial instruments. Although
the adoption of SFAS 157 did not materially impact our financial position, results of operations,
or cash flow, we are now required to provide additional disclosures as part of our financial
statements.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in
measuring fair value. These tiers are: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices
in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are
either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of September 30, 2008, we held investments in auction rate securities, totaling $70.8
million, with a fair value of $63.8 million, which are required to be measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. Our auction rate securities are designated as available-for-sale securities and
are reflected at fair value. Prior to January 1, 2008, these securities were recorded at fair value
based on quoted prices in active markets (i.e., SFAS 157 Level 1 data). Liquidity for these auction
rate securities is typically provided by an auction process which allows holders to sell their
notes, and which resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, usually every 7,
28, or 35 days. However, due to recent events in the credit markets, the auction events for some of
these instruments failed during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. An auction failure means
that the parties wishing to sell their securities could not be matched with an adequate volume of
buyers. Therefore, the fair values of these securities were estimated using a discounted cash flow
analysis or other type of valuation model as of September 30, 2008. These analyses considered,
among other things, the collateral underlying the securities, the creditworthiness of the
counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the expectation of the next time the
security would be expected to have a successful auction. The estimated values of these securities
were also compared, when possible, to valuation data with respect to similar securities held by
other parties.
10
As a result of the decline in fair value for our investments in auction rate securities, which
we deem to be temporary and attribute to liquidity issues rather than to credit issues, we recorded
unrealized losses, net of tax at the combined federal and state
statutory rate, of $1.2 million and $4.3 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively, to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Substantially
all of the $63.8 million in auction rate security instruments held by us at September 30, 2008 were
in securities collateralized by student loans, which loans are guaranteed by the U.S. government.
Due to our belief that the market for these student loan collateralized instruments may take in
excess of twelve months to fully recover, we have classified these investments as non-current, and
have included them in investments on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at
September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we continue to earn interest on our auction rate
security instruments. Any future fluctuation in fair value related to these instruments that we
deem to be temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be recorded to
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. If we determine that any future valuation adjustment
was other than temporary, we would record a charge to earnings as appropriate.
Our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements
of SFAS 157 at September 30, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Auction rate securities |
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
Other available-for-sale securities |
|
|
163,676 |
|
|
|
163,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value |
|
$ |
227,503 |
|
|
$ |
163,676 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on market conditions which resulted in the absence of quoted prices in active markets
for our auction rate securities, we changed our valuation methodology for auction rate securities
to a discounted cash flow analysis during the first quarter of 2008. Accordingly, since our initial
adoption of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008, these securities changed from Level 1 to Level 3 within
SFAS 157s hierarchy. The following table presents our assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in SFAS 157 at September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Measurements |
|
|
|
Using Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Auction Rate Securities |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
Transfers to Level 3 |
|
|
82,150 |
|
Total losses (realized or unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(6,923 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
(11,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
63,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total losses for the period included in
other comprehensive income attributable to the change
in unrealized losses relating to assets still held at
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(6,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
11
4. Receivables
Receivables consist primarily of amounts due from the various states in which we operate. All
receivables are subject to potential retroactive adjustment. As the amounts of all receivables are
readily determinable and our creditors are in almost all instances state governments, our allowance
for doubtful accounts is immaterial. Any amounts determined to be uncollectible are charged to
expense when such determination is made. Accounts receivable by health plan operating subsidiary
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
California |
|
$ |
63,583 |
|
|
$ |
23,046 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
10,511 |
|
|
|
6,419 |
|
Missouri |
|
|
22,714 |
|
|
|
15,986 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
34,196 |
|
|
|
28,522 |
|
Utah |
|
|
20,205 |
|
|
|
23,987 |
|
Washington |
|
|
9,679 |
|
|
|
8,308 |
|
Others |
|
|
8,872 |
|
|
|
5,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables |
|
$ |
169,760 |
|
|
$ |
111,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California. The significant increase in our California health plan receivable as of September
30, 2008 was due to the delayed passage of the California state budget for 2008-2009. Until the
budget was passed on September 23, 2008, the State of California had ceased paying its vendors for
the previous two months billings. Substantially all receivables due our California and Missouri
health plans at September 30, 2008 were collected in October 2008.
Ohio. As of September 30, 2008, the receivable due our Ohio health plan included two
significant components. The first is approximately $10.0 million of accrued birth income, net, due
from the State of Ohio. Birth income is a one-time payment for the delivery of a child from the
Medicaid program in Ohio.
The second significant component of the Ohio receivable is approximately $22.0 million due
from a capitated provider group. Although we have a capitation arrangement with this provider
group, our agreement with them calls for us to pay for certain medical services incurred by the
provider groups members, and then to deduct the amount of such payments from the monthly
capitation paid to the provider group. Of the $22.0 million receivable, approximately $14.8 million
represents medical services we have paid on behalf of the provider group, which we will deduct from
capitation payments in the months of October and November 2008. The other component of the Ohio
receivable includes an estimate of our liability for claims incurred by members of this provider
group, not covered by capitation, for which we have not yet made payment. This amount totaled $7.2
million as of
September 30, 2008. The offsetting liability for the amount of this receivable established for
claims incurred but not paid is included in Medical claims and benefits payable in our condensed
consolidated balance sheets. As part of the agreement with this provider group, our Ohio health
plan has withheld approximately $9.0 million from capitation payments due the group, and placed the
funds in an escrow account. The Ohio health plan is entitled to the escrow amount if the provider
group is unable to repay amounts owed to us. The escrow account is included in Restricted
investments in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the quarter ended September 30,
2008, our average capitation payment to this provider group was approximately $12 million.
Utah. Our Utah health plans agreement with the State of Utah calls for the reimbursement of
medical costs incurred in serving our members plus an administrative fee of 9% of that medical cost
amount, plus a portion of any cost savings realized as defined in the agreement. Our Utah health
plan bills the State of Utah monthly for actual paid health care claims plus administrative fees.
Our receivable balance from the State of Utah includes: (1) amounts billed to the state for actual
paid health care claims plus administrative fees; and (2) amounts estimated for incurred but not
reported claims, which, along with the related administrative fees, are not billable to the State
of Utah until such claims are actually paid.
5. Other Assets
Receivable for ceded life and annuity contracts. We acquired our wholly owned life insurance
subsidiary, Molina Healthcare Insurance Company, in 2005. We report this 100% ceded reinsurance
arrangement by recording a
non-current receivable from the reinsurer with a corresponding non-current liability for ceded
life and annuity contracts.
12
Other assets. Other assets include primarily deferred financing costs associated with our
long-term debt, certain investments held in connection with our deferred employee compensation
program, and an investment in a vision services provider (see Note 9, Related Party
Transactions).
6. Long-Term Debt
Convertible Senior Notes
In October 2007, we completed our offering of $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the Notes). The sale of the Notes resulted in net
proceeds of $193.4 million. The Notes rank equally in right of payment with our existing and future
senior indebtedness, and are convertible into cash and, under certain circumstances, shares of our
common stock. The initial conversion rate is 21.3067 shares of our common stock per one thousand
dollar principal amount of the Notes. This represents an initial conversion price of approximately
$46.93 per share of our common stock. In addition, if certain corporate transactions that
constitute a change of control occur prior to maturity, we will increase the conversion rate in
certain circumstances. Prior to July 2014, holders may convert their Notes only under the following
circumstances:
|
|
During any fiscal quarter after our fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2007, if the closing
sale price per share of our common stock, for each of at least 20 trading days during the
period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous fiscal
quarter, is greater than or equal to 120% of the conversion price per share of our common
stock; |
|
|
During the five business day period immediately following any five consecutive trading day
period in which the trading price per one thousand dollar principal amount of the Notes for
each trading day of such period was less than 98% of the product of the closing price per
share of our common stock on such day and the conversion rate in effect on such day; or |
|
|
|
Upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions or other specified events. |
On or after July 1, 2014, holders may convert their Notes at any time prior to the close of
business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the stated maturity date regardless of
whether any of the conditions noted above is satisfied.
We will deliver cash and shares of our common stock, if any, upon conversion of each $1,000
principal amount of the Notes, as follows:
|
|
An amount in cash equal to the sum of, for each of the 20 Volume-Weighted Average Price (the
VWAP) trading days during the conversion period, the lesser of the daily conversion value
for such VWAP trading day and fifty dollars (representing 1/20th of one thousand dollars); and |
|
|
A number of shares based upon, for each of the 20 VWAP trading days during the conversion
period, any excess of the daily conversion value above fifty dollars. |
Credit Facility
In 2005, we entered into the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2005,
among Molina Healthcare Inc., certain lenders, and Bank of America N.A., as Administrative Agent
(the Credit Facility). Effective May 2007, we entered into a third amendment of the Credit
Facility that increased the size of the revolving line of credit to $200.0 million, maturing in May
2012. The Credit Facility is intended to be used for working capital and general corporate
purposes, and subject to obtaining commitments from existing or new lenders and satisfaction of
other specified conditions, we may increase the Credit Facility to up to $250.0 million.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility are based, at our election, on the London Interbank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR, or the base rate plus an applicable margin. The base rate equals the higher
of Bank of Americas prime rate or 0.500% above the federal funds rate. We also pay a commitment
fee on the total unused commitments of the lenders under the Credit Facility. The applicable
margins and commitment fee are based on our ratio of consolidated funded debt to consolidated
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA. The applicable margins
range between 0.750% and 1.750% for LIBOR loans and between 0.000% and 0.750% for base rate loans.
The commitment fee ranges between 0.150% and 0.275%. In addition, we are required to pay a fee for
each letter of credit issued under the Credit Facility equal to the applicable margin for LIBOR
loans and a customary fronting fee. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were no
amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility.
13
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a lien on substantially all of our
assets and by a pledge of the capital stock of our Michigan, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas,
Utah, and Washington health plan subsidiaries. The Credit Facility includes usual and customary
covenants for credit facilities of this type, including covenants limiting liens, mergers, asset
sales, other fundamental changes, debt, acquisitions, dividends and other distributions, capital
expenditures, investments, and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The amended Credit Facility also
requires us to maintain a ratio of total consolidated debt to total consolidated EBITDA of not more
than 2.75 to 1.00 at any time. At September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with all financial
covenants in the Credit Facility.
7. Stockholders Equity
In April 2008, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30 million of our
common stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. We used working
capital to fund the repurchases under this program. The timing and amount of repurchases were
primarily made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan effective as of May 5, 2008, and terminated
when the aggregate cost of the repurchases totaled $30 million on June 12, 2008. During the quarter
ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased approximately 1.1 million shares.
In July 2008, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional one
million shares of our common stock. We used working capital to fund the repurchases under this
program. The timing and amount of repurchases were primarily made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading
plan effective as of August 1, 2008. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased
approximately 91,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $2.7 million. See Note 10,
Subsequent Events.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
The health care industry is subject to numerous laws and regulations of federal, state, and
local governments. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be subject to government review
and interpretation, as well as regulatory actions unknown and unasserted at this time. Penalties
associated with violations of these laws and regulations include significant fines and penalties,
exclusion from participating in publicly-funded programs, and the repayment of previously billed
and collected revenues.
We are involved in legal actions
in the normal course of business, some of which seek monetary
damages, including claims for punitive damages, which are not covered
by insurance. The outcome of such legal actions is inherently
uncertain. Nevertheless, we believe that these actions (including the
previously disclosed Starko and Ward litigation matters),
when finally concluded and determined, are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
Provider Claims
Many of our medical contracts are complex in nature and may be subject to differing
interpretations regarding amounts due for the provision of various services. Such differing
interpretations have led certain medical providers to pursue us for additional compensation. The
claims made by providers in such circumstances often involve issues of contract compliance,
interpretation, payment methodology, and intent. These claims often extend to services provided by
the providers over a number of years.
Various providers have contacted us seeking additional compensation for claims that we believe
to have been settled. These matters, when finally concluded and determined, will not, in our
opinion, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
Regulatory Capital and Dividend Restrictions
Our principal operations are conducted through our HMO subsidiaries operating in California,
Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and Utah. Our HMOs are subject to
state regulations that, among other things, require the maintenance of minimum levels of statutory
capital, as defined by each state, and restrict the timing, payment, and amount of dividends and
other distributions that may be paid to us as the sole stockholder. To the extent the subsidiaries
must comply with these regulations, they may not have the financial flexibility to transfer funds
to us. The net assets in these subsidiaries (after intercompany eliminations), which may
14
not be transferable to us in the form of cash dividends, loans, or advances, were $340.1
million at September 30, 2008, and $332.2 million at December 31, 2007. The National Association of
Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, adopted model rules effective December 31, 1998, which, if
implemented by a state, set new minimum capitalization requirements for insurance companies, HMOs,
and other entities bearing risk for health care coverage. The requirements take the form of
risk-based capital, or RBC, rules. Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Washington
have adopted these rules, although the rules as adopted may vary somewhat from state to state.
California and Missouri have established their own minimum capitalization requirements for
insurance companies.
As of September 30, 2008, our HMOs had aggregate statutory capital and surplus of
approximately $349.9 million, compared with the required minimum aggregate statutory capital and
surplus of approximately $209.2 million. All of our HMOs were in compliance with the minimum
capital requirements at September 30, 2008. We have the ability and commitment to provide
additional capital to each of our HMOs when necessary to ensure that they continue to meet
statutory and regulatory capital requirements.
9. Related Party Transactions
We have an equity investment in a medical service provider that provides certain vision
services to our members. We account for this investment under the equity method of accounting
because we have an ownership interest in the investee in excess of 20%. As of September 30, 2008
and 2007, our carrying amount for this investment totaled
$3.6 million and $3.5 million,
respectively. During 2007, we paid this provider a $0.9 million network access fee that was fully
amortized as of June 30, 2008. During the second quarter of 2008, we advanced this provider $0.3
million, which was fully offset against capitation payments owed to
the provider as of June 30, 2008. During the third quarter of 2008, we advanced this provider $0.2 million, which will be
offset against capitation payments owed to the provider in 2008. For the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, we paid $4.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, for medical
service fees to this provider. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, we paid $11.2
million and $9.2 million, respectively, for medical service fees to this provider.
We are a party to a fee-for-service agreement with Pacific Hospital of Long Beach (Pacific
Hospital). Pacific Hospital is owned by Abrazos Healthcare, Inc., the shares of which are held as
community property by the husband of Dr. Martha Bernadett, our Executive Vice President, Research
and Development. Amounts paid under the terms of this fee-for-service agreement were $29,000 and
$48,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $139,000 and
$90,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We also have a
capitation arrangement with Pacific Hospital, where we pay a fixed monthly fee based on member
type. We paid Pacific Hospital for capitation services totaling
approximately $1.5 million and $1.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $3.2 million and $3.3
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We believe that both
arrangements with Pacific Hospital are based on prevailing market rates for similar services. Also
as of September 30, 2008, we had an advance outstanding to Pacific Hospital totaling $91,000, which
is offsetting capitation payments in 2008.
In 2006, we assumed an office lease from Millworks Capital Ventures which at that time had a
remaining term of 52 months. Millworks Capital Ventures is owned by John C. Molina, our Chief
Financial Officer, and his wife. The monthly base lease payment is approximately $18,000 and is
subject to an annual increase. Based on a market report prepared by an independent realtor, we
believe the terms and conditions of the assumed lease were at that time at fair market value. We
are currently using the office space under the lease for an office expansion. Payments made under
this lease totaled $68,000 and $57,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $200,000 and $188,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
We lease two medical clinics that are owned by the Mary R. Molina Living Trust and the Molina
Marital Trust. These leases have 5 five-year renewal options. Rental expense for these leases
totaled $16,000 and $24,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
and $65,000 and $73,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
10. Subsequent Events
Florida subsidiary. In August 2008, we announced our intention to acquire Florida NetPASS, LLC
(NetPASS), a provider of care management and
administrative services to approximately 55,000
Florida MediPass members in South and Central Florida. We expect the closing of the transaction to
occur in the first quarter of 2009, at a purchase price of approximately $42 million, subject to
adjustments. On October 1, 2008, we completed the initial closing of the transaction, under which we acquired one percent of the ownership
interests of
15
NetPASS for $9 million. Additionally, we deposited $9 million to an escrow account
that will be used for the purpose of reimbursing the State of Florida for any sums due under a
final settlement agreement with the state.
On October 7, 2008, we announced that our wholly owned subsidiary, Molina Healthcare of
Florida, Inc., was awarded a Medicaid managed care contract by the State of Florida. The term of
the contract will commence on December 1, 2008, at which time Molina Healthcare of Florida will
begin its initial enrollment of NetPASS Medicaid members, with the full transition of NetPASS
members expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2009.
Stock repurchases. From October 1, 2008 through October 30, 2008, we repurchased approximately
722,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase
price of $17.3 million (average cost
of approximately $23.92 per share). These purchases have completed the Companys stock purchase
plan announced in July 2008. Through October 30, 2008, we have repurchased approximately 1.9
million shares at an aggregate purchase price of $50 million pursuant to the two repurchase plans
announced during the year.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This document and the following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements
and the notes to those statements appearing elsewhere in this report and the audited financial
statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
17
Overview
Summary highlights of our quarter ended September 30, 2008 include:
Net earnings of $0.62 per diluted share, consistent
with the third quarter of 2007.
Quarterly premium revenues of $792 million, up 26% over 2007.
Aggregate membership up nearly 16% over 2007.
Consolidated medical care ratio of 84.6%, up from 83.7% over 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per-share data) |
Earnings per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
791,554 |
|
|
$ |
628,402 |
|
|
$ |
2,282,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,791,764 |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
30,429 |
|
|
$ |
28,815 |
|
|
$ |
85,138 |
|
|
$ |
67,694 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17,186 |
|
|
$ |
17,513 |
|
|
$ |
46,857 |
|
|
$ |
40,419 |
|
Medical care ratio |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
|
84.9 |
% |
|
|
84.8 |
% |
G&A expenses as a percentage of total revenue |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Total ending membership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239,000 |
|
|
|
1,070,000 |
|
Revenue
Premium revenue is fixed in advance of the periods covered and, except as described below, is
not generally subject to significant accounting estimates. For the nine months ended September 30,
2008, we received approximately 92% of our premium revenue as a fixed amount per member per month,
or PMPM, pursuant to our contracts with state Medicaid agencies, Medicare and other managed care
organizations for which we operate as a subcontractor. These premium revenues are recognized in the month that members are entitled to receive
health care services. The state Medicaid programs and the federal Medicare program periodically
adjust premium rates.
The amount of the premiums paid to us may vary substantially between states and among various
government programs. PMPM premiums for members of the State Childrens Health Insurance Program
(SCHIP) are generally among our lowest, with rates as low as approximately $80 PMPM in California
and Utah. Premium revenues for Medicaid members are generally higher. Among the Temporary Aid for
Needy Families (TANF) Medicaid population the Medicaid group that includes most mothers and
children PMPM premiums range between approximately $100 in California to $300 in New Mexico.
Among our Medicaid Aged, Blind or Disabled (ABD) membership, PMPM premiums range from approximately
$450 in California and Texas to over $1,000 in New Mexico and Ohio. Medicare premiums are
approximately $1,200 PMPM, with Medicare revenue totaling $72.4 million and $32.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Approximately 3% of our premium revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
realized under a Medicaid cost-plus reimbursement agreement that our Utah plan has with that state.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we also received approximately 5% of our premium
revenue in the form of birth income a one-time payment for the delivery of a child from the
Medicaid programs in Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Texas, and Washington. Such payments are recognized
as revenue in the month the birth occurs.
Certain components of premium revenue are subject to accounting estimates. Chief among these
are (1) that portion of premium revenue paid to our New Mexico health plan by the State of New
Mexico that may be refunded to the state if certain minimum amounts are not expended on defined
medical care costs, (2) that portion of the revenue of our Ohio health plan that is at risk if
certain performance measures are not met, (3) the additional premium revenue our Utah health plan
is entitled to receive from the State of Utah as an incentive payment for saving the State of Utah
money in relation to fee-for-service Medicaid, and (4) the profit-sharing agreement between our
Texas health plan and the State of Texas, where we pay a rebate to the State of Texas if our Texas
health plan generates pretax income above a certain specified percentage, according to a tiered
rebate schedule.
Our contract with the State of New Mexico requires that we spend a minimum percentage of
premium revenue on certain explicitly defined medical care costs. Our contract is for a three-year
period, and the minimum percentage is based on premiums and medical care costs over the entire
contract period. Through June 30, 2008, we have recorded adjustments totaling $12.9 million to
increase premium revenue associated with this requirement. The
18
revenue resulted from a reversal of
previously recorded amounts due the State of New Mexico because we exceeded
the minimum percentage for the six months ended June 30, 2008. At June 30, 2008, there was no
liability recorded under the terms of this contract provision. Any change to the terms of this
provision, including revisions to the definitions of premium revenue or medical care costs, the
period of time over which the minimum percentage is measured or the manner of its measurement, or
the percentage of revenue required to be spent on the defined medical care costs, may trigger a
change in this amount. If the State of New Mexico disagrees with our interpretation of the existing
contract terms, an adjustment to this amount may be required.
Under our contract with the State of Ohio, up to 1% of our Ohio health plans revenue may be
refundable to the state if certain performance measures are not met.
At September 30, 2008, we
believe that we are compliant with all of the performance measures and have not reserved any
amounts for potential repayment to the state.
In prior years, we estimated amounts we believed were recoverable under our savings sharing
agreement with the State of Utah based on available information and our interpretation of our
contract with the State. The State may not agree with our interpretation or our application of the
contract language, and it may also not agree with the manner in which we have processed and
analyzed our member claims and encounter records. Thus, the ultimate amount of savings sharing
revenue that we realize from prior years may be subject to negotiation with the State. During 2007,
as a result of an ongoing disagreement with the State of Utah, we wrote off the entire receivable,
totaling $4.7 million. Our Utah health plan continues to work with the State to assure an
appropriate determination of amounts due to us under the savings share agreement. When additional
information is known, or agreement is reached with the State regarding the appropriate savings
sharing payment amount for prior years, we will adjust the amount of savings sharing revenue
recorded in our financial statements as appropriate in light of such new information or agreement.
As of September 30, 2008, we had a liability of approximately $6.6 million accrued pursuant to
our profit-sharing agreement with the State of Texas for the 2007 and 2008 contract years ending
August 31. During the third quarter of 2008, we paid the State of Texas $1.1 million relating to
the 2007 contract year. Because the final settlement calculations include a claims run-out period
of nearly one year, the amounts recorded, based on our estimates, may be adjusted. We believe that
the ultimate settlement will not differ materially from our estimate.
Historically, membership growth has been the primary reason for our increasing revenues,
although more recently our revenues have also grown due to the more care intensive benefits
associated with our ABD and Medicare members. We have increased our membership through both
internal growth and acquisitions. The following table sets forth the approximate total number of
members by state health plan as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
Total Ending Membership by Health Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
313,000 |
|
|
|
296,000 |
|
|
|
288,000 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
207,000 |
|
|
|
209,000 |
|
|
|
211,000 |
|
Missouri (1) |
|
|
77,000 |
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico |
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
179,000 |
|
|
|
136,000 |
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
Texas |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Utah |
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Washington |
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
283,000 |
|
|
|
284,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,239,000 |
|
|
|
1,149,000 |
|
|
|
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Ending Membership by State for the Medicare Advantage Plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
New Mexico |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah |
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,802 |
|
Washington |
|
|
967 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
7,686 |
|
|
|
5,092 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
As of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
Total Ending Membership by State for the Aged, Blind or Disabled Population: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
12,523 |
|
|
|
11,837 |
|
|
|
10,912 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
30,396 |
|
|
|
31,399 |
|
|
|
31,488 |
|
New Mexico |
|
|
6,464 |
|
|
|
6,792 |
|
|
|
6,844 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
19,647 |
|
|
|
14,887 |
|
|
|
14,965 |
|
Texas |
|
|
16,221 |
|
|
|
16,018 |
|
|
|
16,515 |
|
Utah |
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
6,795 |
|
|
|
7,056 |
|
Washington |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
2,814 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
95,278 |
|
|
|
90,542 |
|
|
|
90,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We acquired our Missouri health plan effective as of November 1, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Less than 1,000 members. |
The following table provides details of total member months (defined as the aggregation of each
months ending membership for the period) by state for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
% of Increase |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
California |
|
|
936,000 |
|
|
|
859,000 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Michigan |
|
|
627,000 |
|
|
|
640,000 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Missouri (1) |
|
|
228,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada (2) |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico |
|
|
249,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
530,000 |
|
|
|
416,000 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
Texas |
|
|
87,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Utah |
|
|
161,000 |
|
|
|
142,000 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
Washington |
|
|
884,000 |
|
|
|
854,000 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,704,000 |
|
|
|
3,201,000 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
% of Increase |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
California |
|
|
2,765,000 |
|
|
|
2,619,000 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Michigan |
|
|
1,904,000 |
|
|
|
1,967,000 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Missouri (1) |
|
|
678,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada (2) |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico |
|
|
716,000 |
|
|
|
589,000 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
1,465,000 |
|
|
|
1,155,000 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
Texas |
|
|
257,000 |
|
|
|
247,000 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Utah |
|
|
482,000 |
|
|
|
438,000 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Washington |
|
|
2,622,000 |
|
|
|
2,570,000 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,895,000 |
|
|
|
9,585,000 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We acquired our Missouri health plan effective as of November 1, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Our Nevada health plan became operational on September 1, 2007, serving only Medicare
members. |
Expenses
Our operating expenses include expenses related to the provision of medical care services and
general and administrative, or G&A, expenses. Our results of operations are impacted by our ability
to effectively manage expenses related to health care services and to accurately estimate costs
incurred. Expenses related to medical care services are captured in the following four categories:
|
|
|
Fee-for-service: Physician providers paid on a fee-for-service basis are paid according
to a fee schedule set by the state or by our contracts with these providers. We pay
hospitals in a variety of ways, including per diem amounts, diagnostic-related groups, or
DRGs, percent of billed charges, case rates, and capitation. We also have stop-loss
agreements with the hospitals with which we contract; under certain circumstances, we pay
escalated charges in connection with these stop-loss agreements. Under all fee-for-service
arrangements, we retain the financial responsibility for medical care provided. Expenses
related to fee-for-service contracts |
20
|
|
|
are recorded in the period in which the related
services are dispensed. The costs of drugs administered in a
physician or hospital setting that are not billed through our pharmacy benefit managers are
included in fee-for-service costs. |
|
|
|
|
Capitation: Many of our primary care physicians and a small portion of our specialists
and hospitals are paid on a capitation basis. Under capitation contracts, we typically pay
a fixed PMPM payment to the provider without regard to the frequency, extent, or nature of
the medical services actually furnished. Under capitated contracts, we remain liable for
the provision of certain health care services. Certain of our capitated contracts also
contain incentive programs based on service delivery, quality of care, utilization
management, and other criteria. Capitation payments are fixed in advance of the periods
covered and are not subject to significant accounting estimates. These payments are
expensed in the period the providers are obligated to provide services. The financial risk
for pharmacy services for a small portion of our membership is delegated to capitated
providers. |
|
|
|
|
Pharmacy: Pharmacy costs include all drug, injectibles, and immunization costs paid
through our pharmacy benefit managers. As noted above, drugs and injectibles not paid
through our pharmacy benefit managers are included in fee-for-service costs, except in
those limited instances where we capitate drug and injectible costs. |
|
|
|
|
Other: Other medical care costs include medically related administrative costs, certain
provider incentive costs, reinsurance cost, and other health care expense. Medically
related administrative costs include, for example, expenses relating to health education,
quality assurance, case management, disease management, 24-hour on-call nurses, and a
portion of our information technology costs. Salary and benefit costs are a substantial
portion of these expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, medically
related administrative costs were approximately $56.2 million and $47.9 million,
respectively. |
The following table provides the details of our consolidated medical care costs for the
periods indicated (dollars in thousands except PMPM amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
Fee-for-service |
|
$ |
439,699 |
|
|
$ |
118.71 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
% |
|
$ |
339,841 |
|
|
$ |
106.15 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
% |
Capitation |
|
|
113,920 |
|
|
|
30.76 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
95,879 |
|
|
|
29.95 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
88,414 |
|
|
|
23.86 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
67,844 |
|
|
|
21.19 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
27,322 |
|
|
|
7.38 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
22,338 |
|
|
|
6.98 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
669,355 |
|
|
$ |
180.71 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
525,902 |
|
|
$ |
164.27 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
Fee-for-service |
|
$ |
1,262,327 |
|
|
$ |
115.87 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
% |
|
$ |
984,375 |
|
|
$ |
102.70 |
|
|
|
64.8 |
% |
Capitation |
|
|
335,418 |
|
|
|
30.79 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
276,742 |
|
|
|
28.87 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
Pharmacy |
|
|
263,372 |
|
|
|
24.17 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
194,354 |
|
|
|
20.28 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
75,414 |
|
|
|
6.92 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
63,773 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,936,531 |
|
|
$ |
177.75 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
1,519,244 |
|
|
$ |
158.50 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our medical care costs include amounts that have been paid by us through the reporting date as
well as estimated liabilities for medical care costs incurred but not paid by us as of the
reporting date. See Critical Accounting Policies below for a comprehensive discussion of how we
estimate such liabilities.
G&A expenses largely consist of wage and benefit costs for our employees, premium taxes, and
other administrative expenses. Some G&A services are provided locally, while others are delivered
to our health plans from our Long Beach headquarters pursuant to an administrative services
agreement. The primary centralized functions are claims processing, information systems, finance
and accounting services, and legal and regulatory services. Locally provided functions include
member services, plan administration, and provider relations. G&A expenses include premium taxes
for each of our health plans in California, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, and Washington.
21
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected operating ratios. All ratios with the exception of the
medical care ratio are shown as a percentage of total revenue. The medical care ratio is shown as a
percentage of premium revenue because there is a direct relationship between the premium revenue
earned and the cost of health care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Premium revenue |
|
|
99.4 |
% |
|
|
98.8 |
% |
|
|
99.2 |
% |
|
|
98.8 |
% |
Investment income |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of direct medical
care costs to premium
revenue |
|
|
82.1 |
% |
|
|
81.0 |
% |
|
|
82.4 |
% |
|
|
82.1 |
% |
Ratio of administrative
costs included in medical
care costs to premium
revenue |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical care ratio |
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
|
84.9 |
% |
|
|
84.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative expense
ratio, excluding premium
taxes |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Premium taxes included in
general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and
administrative expense
ratio |
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization expense
ratio |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Effective tax rate |
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared with Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
The
following tables summarize premium revenue, medical care costs, medical care ratio, and premium
taxes by health plan for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 (dollars
in thousands except PMPM amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Premium Revenue |
|
|
Medical Care Costs |
|
|
Medical |
|
|
Premium Tax |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Care Ratio |
|
|
Expense |
|
California |
|
$ |
102,383 |
|
|
$ |
109.37 |
|
|
$ |
91,224 |
|
|
$ |
97.45 |
|
|
|
89.1 |
% |
|
$ |
2,995 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
127,535 |
|
|
|
203.39 |
|
|
|
101,596 |
|
|
|
162.03 |
|
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
Missouri |
|
|
59,223 |
|
|
|
259.17 |
|
|
|
47,730 |
|
|
|
208.88 |
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
1,053.04 |
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
1198.68 |
|
|
|
113.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico |
|
|
84,386 |
|
|
|
338.65 |
|
|
|
73,723 |
|
|
|
295.86 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
2,838 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
162,553 |
|
|
|
306.74 |
|
|
|
148,660 |
|
|
|
280.52 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
8,851 |
|
Texas |
|
|
30,986 |
|
|
|
357.01 |
|
|
|
24,730 |
|
|
|
284.93 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Utah |
|
|
41,860 |
|
|
|
260.24 |
|
|
|
36,012 |
|
|
|
223.88 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
178,639 |
|
|
|
202.19 |
|
|
|
136,609 |
|
|
|
154.62 |
|
|
|
76.5 |
|
|
|
2,959 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
791,554 |
|
|
$ |
213.70 |
|
|
$ |
669,355 |
|
|
$ |
180.71 |
|
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
$ |
24,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Premium Revenue |
|
|
Medical Care Costs |
|
|
Medical |
|
|
Premium Tax |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Care Ratio |
|
|
Expense |
|
California |
|
$ |
93,154 |
|
|
$ |
108.39 |
|
|
$ |
76,443 |
|
|
$ |
88.95 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
% |
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
119,752 |
|
|
|
187.19 |
|
|
|
100,378 |
|
|
|
156.90 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
7,069 |
|
New Mexico |
|
|
72,543 |
|
|
|
361.23 |
|
|
|
56,984 |
|
|
|
283.76 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
2,828 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
125,452 |
|
|
|
302.02 |
|
|
|
111,387 |
|
|
|
268.16 |
|
|
|
88.8 |
|
|
|
5,645 |
|
Texas |
|
|
24,997 |
|
|
|
279.39 |
|
|
|
19,041 |
|
|
|
212.82 |
|
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Utah |
|
|
27,513 |
|
|
|
193.52 |
|
|
|
26,534 |
|
|
|
186.63 |
|
|
|
96.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
164,367 |
|
|
|
192.43 |
|
|
|
130,216 |
|
|
|
152.45 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
628,402 |
|
|
$ |
196.29 |
|
|
$ |
525,902 |
|
|
$ |
164.27 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
$ |
21,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other medical care costs represent primarily medically related administrative
costs at the parent company. |
22
Net Income
Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was $17.2 million, or $0.62 per diluted
share, compared with net income of $17.5 million, or $0.62 per diluted share, for the third quarter
of 2007.
Premium Revenue
Premium revenue for the third quarter of 2008 was $791.6 million, an increase of $163.2
million, or 26%, over the $628.4 million of premium revenue for the third quarter of 2007.
Medicare premium revenue for the third quarter of 2008 was $28.1 million compared with $12.7
million in the third quarter of 2007. Excluding the impact of the November 1, 2007 acquisition of
the Missouri plan, consolidated membership increased 8.6% between September 30, 2007 and September
30, 2008. Significant contributors to the $163.2 million increase in quarterly premium revenue
included the following:
|
|
|
A $59.2 million increase as a result of the acquisition of the Companys Missouri health
plan on November 1, 2007. The Missouri health plan received a blended rate increase of
approximately 8.5% effective July 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
A $37.1 million increase at the Ohio health plan due to higher enrollment, particularly
in the CFC population. Effective September 1, 2008, the Ohio health plan added
approximately 4,000 Aged, Blind or Disabled (ABD) members in the Central and West Central
regions. |
|
|
|
|
A $15.4 million increase in Medicare premium revenue
across all health plans where we operate Medicare programs, primarily
due to increased enrollment and the recognition of $2.6 million in risk adjustment revenue. |
|
|
|
|
An $8.2 million increase in Medicaid revenue at the California health plan, primarily
due to increased membership. The California health plans Medicaid revenue decreased $1.3
million from the second quarter of 2008. Sequentially, premium revenue on a PMPM basis
declined approximately 3%, reflecting the rate cuts implemented by the State of California
for the period July 1, 2008 through August 17, 2008. Premium revenue for the California
health plan has been recorded at rates in effect immediately prior to July 1, 2008 for the
period August 18, 2008 through September 30, 2008 as the result of a court injunction
issued on August 18, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
A $4.3 million increase in Medicaid premium revenue at the Michigan health plan,
primarily due to $3.7 million in supplemental revenue from the Michigan Department of
Community Health. The supplemental revenue is intended to offset the unintended effects of
the Michigan Business Tax (MBT) that replaced Michigans Single Business Tax (SBT) as of
January 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The unintended effect of the MBT is the taxation of both the premiums and the net income of
health plans, driving the effective federal and state combined tax rate on the Michigan
health plan to nearly 49%. The $3.7 million in supplemental revenue was intended to offset
MBTs taxation of gross receipts for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Effective October 1, 2008, the Michigan health plan received an estimated blended rate
increase of approximately 5.5%, plus an additional increase of approximately 0.9% for
ongoing MBT relief. The rate increase is tied to an expansion of benefits and coverage that
will result in increased medical care costs for the Michigan health plan in the future. |
|
|
|
|
After allowing for the supplemental revenue and the aforementioned ongoing MBT relief, we
anticipate our 2008 Michigan tax expense will be approximately $0.5 million higher (before
federal tax benefit) than the amount computed using the SBT methodology. |
23
Investment Income
Investment income during the third quarter of 2008 totaled $4.8 million compared with $7.6
million in the third quarter of 2007, a decrease of $2.8 million, primarily due to declining
interest rates and slightly lower invested balances as a result of cash used in the share
repurchase program.
Medical Care Costs
Medical care costs as a percentage of premium revenue (the medical care ratio) increased to
84.6% in the third quarter of 2008 from 83.7% in the third quarter of 2007. Sequentially, the
medical care ratio increased from 84.2% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Excluding Medicare,
our medical care ratio was 84.9% in the third quarter of 2008, 83.8% in the third quarter of 2007,
and 84.2% in the second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Missouri health plan was 80.6% for the quarter, down from
83.0% in the second quarter of 2008. The 8.5% premium increase discussed above was
partially offset by increased unit costs due to revised provider contracts and a fee
schedule increase effective July 1, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the California health plan increased to 89.1% in the third
quarter of 2008 from 82.1% in the third quarter of 2007 and 84.9% in the second quarter of
2008. The increase in the plans medical care ratio was caused primarily by a decrease in
premium rates as discussed above and higher fee-for-service and pharmacy costs. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the New Mexico health plan increased to 87.4% in the third
quarter of 2008 from 78.6% in the third quarter of 2007 and 78.0% in the second quarter of
2008. The sequential increase was primarily due to the reduced benefit from the release of
amounts reserved as a result of the minimum medical cost ratio provision in the New Mexico
health plans state contract. The Company recognized $6.2 million of revenue under this
provision in the second quarter of 2008, but none for the third quarter of 2008.
Additionally, the New Mexico health plan received a blended rate decrease of approximately
3% effective July 1, 2008 for its non-Medicare programs. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Ohio health plan, by line of business, was as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Sept. 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Sept. 30, 2007 |
Covered Families and Children (CFC) |
|
|
89.9 |
% |
|
|
90.7 |
% |
|
|
85.5 |
% |
Aged, Blind or Disabled (ABD) |
|
|
94.6 |
|
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
94.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
91.5 |
% |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
88.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sequentially, the medical care ratio for the CFC line of business decreased 80 basis points
primarily due to lower capitation and pharmacy costs. The sequential increase in the medical
care ratio for the ABD line of business was primarily due to higher specialist
fee-for-service costs. |
|
|
|
|
Effective September 1, 2008, the Ohio health plan
received risk adjustments to its ABD
premium rates. We estimate that these adjustments will result in a net increase to premium
revenue of approximately $500,000 per month from September 1st going forward.
Additionally, we have re-negotiated certain provider contracts in the Central region of
Ohio, which we believe will reduce unit costs beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Texas health plan increased to 79.8% in the third quarter
of 2008 from 76.2% in the third quarter of 2007. This increase was primarily due to higher
hospital fee-for-service costs. During the third quarter of 2008, the Texas health plan
increased its revenue $1.3 million to record adjustments relating to its profit-sharing
agreement with the State of Texas. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Washington health plan decreased to 76.5% in the third
quarter of 2008 from 79.2% in the third quarter of 2007, primarily due to lower
fee-for-service hospital costs. |
24
Days in medical claims and benefits payable were 44 days at September 30, 2008, a 6% decrease
from the 47 days reported at June 30, 2008, and a 19% decrease from the 54 days reported at
September 30, 2007. As of September 30, 2008, medical claims inventory (measured as the total
billed charges of all claims received but not paid as of the reporting date) has decreased
approximately 30% since June 30, 2008, and 37% since September 30, 2007. Our reserving methodology
is applied consistently across all periods presented.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative, or G&A, expenses were $88.0 million, or 11.1% of total revenue,
for the third quarter of 2008 compared with $74.2 million, or 11.7% of total revenue, for the third
quarter of 2007.
Core G&A expenses (defined as G&A expenses less premium taxes) were 8.0% of revenue in the
third quarter of 2008 compared with 8.4% in the third quarter of 2007 and 8.2% in the second
quarter of 2008. The decrease in core G&A compared with the third quarter of 2007 was primarily due
to lower administrative payroll, as indicated in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Medicare-related administrative costs |
|
$ |
4,112 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
$ |
2,330 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Non Medicare-related administrative costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative payroll, including
employee incentive compensation |
|
|
49,429 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
43,326 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Florida health plan start-up expenses |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other administrative expense |
|
|
9,125 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
7,450 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core G&A expenses |
|
$ |
63,470 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
53,106 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1.4 million in the third quarter of 2008
compared with the third quarter of 2007, including a $0.6 million increase in depreciation expense
due to investments in infrastructure, and a $0.8 million increase in amortization expense primarily
due to the amortization of intangible assets associated with the 2007 Mercy CarePlus acquisition in
Missouri.
Interest Expense
Interest expense in the third quarter of 2008 increased $1.5 million compared with the third
quarter of 2007, principally due to the issuance of our $200 million of Notes in October 2007.
Income Taxes
Income taxes were recorded at an effective rate of 39.6% in the third quarter of 2008 compared
with 38.1% in the third quarter of 2007. The increase in our effective tax rate was primarily the
result of a change in Michigan state taxes effective January 1, 2008. We expect our effective tax
rate for the fourth quarter of 2008 and all of fiscal year 2008 to be approximately 41%.
25
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
The
following tables summarize premium revenue, medical care costs, medical care ratio, and premium
taxes by health plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 (dollars
in thousands except PMPM amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
Premium Revenue |
|
|
Medical Care Costs |
|
|
Medical |
|
|
Premium Tax |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Care Ratio |
|
|
Expense |
|
California |
|
$ |
308,139 |
|
|
$ |
111.44 |
|
|
$ |
269,328 |
|
|
$ |
97.40 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
% |
|
$ |
9,195 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
377,669 |
|
|
|
198.36 |
|
|
|
304,769 |
|
|
|
160.08 |
|
|
|
80.7 |
|
|
|
19,976 |
|
Missouri |
|
|
165,509 |
|
|
|
244.00 |
|
|
|
139,462 |
|
|
|
205.60 |
|
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
1,184.30 |
|
|
|
6,632 |
|
|
|
1,230.61 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
New Mexico |
|
|
262,314 |
|
|
|
366.55 |
|
|
|
215,242 |
|
|
|
300.77 |
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
|
|
8,523 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
434,272 |
|
|
|
296.40 |
|
|
|
395,013 |
|
|
|
269.60 |
|
|
|
91.0 |
|
|
|
21,127 |
|
Texas |
|
|
80,159 |
|
|
|
311.84 |
|
|
|
62,229 |
|
|
|
242.08 |
|
|
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
Utah |
|
|
114,591 |
|
|
|
237.69 |
|
|
|
100,935 |
|
|
|
209.37 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
531,457 |
|
|
|
202.71 |
|
|
|
426,962 |
|
|
|
162.85 |
|
|
|
80.3 |
|
|
|
8,797 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,282,345 |
|
|
$ |
209.49 |
|
|
$ |
1,936,531 |
|
|
$ |
177.75 |
|
|
|
84.9 |
% |
|
$ |
69,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Premium Revenue |
|
|
Medical Care Costs |
|
|
Medical |
|
|
Premium Tax |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
PMPM |
|
|
Care Ratio |
|
|
Expense |
|
California |
|
$ |
280,796 |
|
|
$ |
107.22 |
|
|
$ |
228,952 |
|
|
$ |
87.42 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
% |
|
$ |
8,614 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
364,945 |
|
|
|
185.54 |
|
|
|
306,163 |
|
|
|
155.66 |
|
|
|
83.9 |
% |
|
|
21,942 |
|
New Mexico |
|
|
191,073 |
|
|
|
324.23 |
|
|
|
159,152 |
|
|
|
270.07 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
% |
|
|
6,438 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
311,853 |
|
|
|
270.08 |
|
|
|
282,164 |
|
|
|
244.37 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
% |
|
|
14,033 |
|
Texas |
|
|
64,406 |
|
|
|
260.88 |
|
|
|
55,163 |
|
|
|
223.44 |
|
|
|
85.6 |
% |
|
|
1,140 |
|
Utah |
|
|
88,473 |
|
|
|
201.87 |
|
|
|
81,535 |
|
|
|
186.04 |
|
|
|
92.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Washington |
|
|
489,254 |
|
|
|
190.36 |
|
|
|
392,201 |
|
|
|
152.60 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
8,117 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,791,764 |
|
|
$ |
186.93 |
|
|
$ |
1,519,244 |
|
|
$ |
158.50 |
|
|
|
84.8 |
% |
|
$ |
60,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other medical care costs primarily represent medically related administrative costs at the
parent company. |
Net Income
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased to $46.9 million, or $1.67
per diluted share, compared with net income of $40.4 million, or $1.43 per diluted share, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Premium Revenue
Premium revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $2,282.3 million, an increase
of $490.5 million, or 27.4%, over $1,791.8 million of premium revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. Significant contributors to this $490.5 million increase in premium revenues
included the following:
|
|
|
A $165.5 million increase as a result of the acquisition of Mercy CarePlus in Missouri
on November 1, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
A $122.4 million increase at the Ohio health plan due to higher enrollment,
particularly in the CFC population. |
|
|
|
|
A $71.2 million increase at the New Mexico health plan due to higher enrollment and
higher premium rates. Additionally, the New Mexico health plan recognized $12.9 million in
revenues in the first six months of 2008 due to the release of reserves associated with a
minimum medical care ratio contract provision under its state contract. |
26
|
|
|
A $42.2 million increase at the Washington health plan due to higher premium rates and
slightly higher membership. |
|
|
|
|
Medicare premium revenue increased $40.3 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008, to $72.4 million from $32.1 million in the same
period of 2007 across all states where we operate Medicare programs. |
Investment Income
Investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $17.5 million compared
with $21.1 million earned in the same period of 2007. The $3.6 million decrease was primarily due
to lower interest rates.
Medical Care Costs
The medical care ratio increased to 84.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
compared with 84.8% for the same period of 2007. Excluding Medicare, the Companys medical care
ratio was 84.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared with 85.0% in the same period
of 2007.
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Michigan health plan decreased to 80.7% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, from 83.9% in the same period of 2007. This decrease was due in part to
lower hospital fee-for-service costs, and to $3.7 million of premium revenue recorded in
connection with tax relief provided by the State of Michigan. The tax relief was provided as
a result of the January 1, 2008 state income tax change discussed above. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the California health plan increased as a result of increases
primarily in pharmacy costs, and secondarily hospital and specialist fee-for-service costs.
The California medical care ratio rose to 87.4% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 from 81.5% in the same period of 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the New Mexico health plan decreased to 82.1% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, from 83.3% in the same period of 2007. This decrease was
primarily due to the impact of the recognition of $12.9 million in revenue resulting from
the release of reserves associated with a minimum medical care ratio contract provision, as
described above. Absent the adjustments made to premium revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, the medical care ratio in New Mexico would have been 86.3% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and 80.4% in the same period of 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Ohio health plan, by line of business, was as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2007 |
Covered Families and Children (CFC) |
|
|
89.9 |
% |
|
|
89.4 |
% |
Aged, Blind or Disabled (ABD) |
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
91.0 |
% |
|
|
90.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Texas health plan decreased to 77.6% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 from 85.6% in the same period of 2007 primarily due to low
medical costs for the Star Plus membership. During the nine months ended September 30,
2008, the Texas health plan reduced revenue $5.5 million to record amounts due the State of
Texas under a profit-sharing agreement. |
|
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Utah health plan decreased to 88.1% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 from 92.2% in the same period of 2007. This decrease was
primarily the result of lower medical care ratios in the Utah health plans SCHIP and
Medicare lines of business. The Utah health plan serves the majority of its Medicaid
membership under a cost-plus contract with the State of Utah. The Utah health plans SCHIP
and Medicare lines of business are conducted under at risk prepaid capitation contracts. |
27
|
|
|
The medical care ratio of the Washington health plan increased slightly to 80.3% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from 80.2% in the same period of 2007.
Fee-for-service hospital and specialist costs as a percentage of premium revenue were
higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 than for the same period of 2007. The
higher fee-for-service costs were driven by increases to the Medicaid fee schedule that
took effect on each of August 1, 2007 and January 1, 2008. |
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $253.2 million, or 11.0% of total revenue, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared with $204.8 million, or 11.3% of total revenue, in
the same period of 2007. This decrease was due primarily to a reduction in premium taxes in
Michigan from 6.0% of premium revenue to 5.5% of premium revenue effective January 1, 2008, and
increased credits taken against premium taxes in New Mexico for the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
Core G&A expenses were 8.0% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Key components of Core G&A expenses are indicated in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare-related administrative costs |
|
$ |
13,522 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
$ |
6,008 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Non Medicare-related administrative costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative payroll, including
employee incentive compensation |
|
|
141,770 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
118,226 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Florida health plan start-up costs |
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other administrative expense |
|
|
27,326 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
20,292 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core G&A expenses |
|
$ |
184,113 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
$ |
144,526 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $4.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared with the same period of 2007, including a $2.5 million increase in
depreciation expense due to investments in infrastructure, and a $2.2 million increase in
amortization expense primarily due to the amortization of intangible assets associated with the
2007 Mercy CarePlus acquisition in Missouri.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $4.2 million compared
with the same period of 2007, principally due to the issuance of our $200 million of Notes in
October 2007.
Income Taxes
Income taxes were recorded at an effective rate of 40.4% for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared with 38.1% for the same period of 2007. The increase in our effective tax rate
was primarily the result of a change in Michigan state taxes effective January 1, 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We
generate cash from premium revenue and investment income. In
addition, in October 2007 we received net proceeds of $193.4 million
through the sale of our Notes. Our primary uses of cash include
the payment of expenses related to medical care services and G&A expenses. We generally receive
premium revenue in advance of payment of claims for related health care services.
28
Our investment policies are designed to provide liquidity, preserve capital, and maximize
total return on invested assets. As of September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$382.4 million, investments totaling $227.5 million, and restricted investments of $36.5 million.
The cash equivalents consist of highly liquid securities with original maturities of no more
than three months that are readily convertible into known amounts of cash. Our investments
consisted of investment grade debt securities and are designated as available-for-sale. Of the
$227.5 million total, $163.7 million are classified as current assets, and $63.8 million are
classified as non-current assets. Our investment policies require that all of our investments have
final maturities of ten years or less (excluding auction rate and variable rate securities where
interest rates are periodically reset) and that the average maturity be four years or less.
The restricted investments, classified as non-current assets and designated as
held-to-maturity, consist of interest-bearing deposits and U.S. treasury securities required by the
respective states in which we operate. These states also prescribe the types of instruments in
which our subsidiaries may invest their funds.
Professional portfolio managers operating under documented investment guidelines manage all of
our investments. The average annualized portfolio yields on our investments for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were approximately 3.3% and 5.2%, respectively.
Cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $20.3
million compared with cash provided by operating activities of $112.8 million for the same period
in 2007, a decrease of $133.1 million. Significant contributors to this decrease included the
following:
|
|
|
A $40.5 million increase in our California health plan receivable as of September 30,
2008 due to the delayed passage of the California state budget for 2008-2009. Until the
budget was passed on September 23, 2008, the State of California had ceased paying its
vendors for the previous two months billings, resulting in our California health plans
receiving no contemporaneous payments for July and August 2008. Substantially all
receivables due our California health plan at September 30, 2008 were collected in
October 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The timing of the receipt of premiums recorded as deferred revenue in the Ohio and Utah
health plans, netting to a total decline of $44.9 million year-over-year. |
|
|
|
|
In 2007, the ramp up of operations and medical claims and benefits payable of the Texas
and Ohio health plans compared with less significant changes in medical claims and benefits
payable for these plans in 2008, netting to a decline of
$31.5 million year-over-year. |
|
|
|
|
The reversal of $12.9 million of accrued costs relating to the minimum medical care
ratio contract provision in New Mexico in the first six months of 2008. |
EBITDA (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
30,429 |
|
|
$ |
28,815 |
|
|
$ |
85,138 |
|
|
$ |
67,694 |
|
Add back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
8,515 |
|
|
|
7,082 |
|
|
|
24,997 |
|
|
|
20,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
38,944 |
|
|
$ |
35,897 |
|
|
$ |
110,135 |
|
|
$ |
87,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company calculates EBITDA by adding back depreciation and amortization
expense to operating income. Operating income included interest
income of $4.7 million and $7.4 million for the three months end
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $17.1 million and
$20.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. EBITDA is not prepared in conformity with GAAP since it excludes
depreciation and amortization expense, as well as interest expense, and the provision for income
taxes. This non-GAAP financial measure should not be considered as an alternative to net income,
operating income, operating margin, or cash provided by operating activities. Management uses
EBITDA as a supplemental metric in evaluating our financial performance, in |
29
evaluating financing and business development decisions, and in forecasting and analyzing
future periods. For these reasons, management believes that EBITDA is a useful supplemental
measure to investors in evaluating our performance and the performance of other companies in our
industry.
We have a $200 million credit facility. Borrowings under this credit facility are based, at
our election, on the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, or the base rate (generally Bank of
Americas prime rate) plus an applicable margin. As of September 30, 2008, there were no amounts
outstanding under our credit facility. See Note 6 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this quarterly report for more information regarding our credit facility.
In April 2008, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30 million of our
common stock on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. We used working
capital to fund the repurchases under this program. The timing and amount of repurchases were
primarily made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan. The trading plan became effective May 5,
2008, and terminated when the aggregate cost of the repurchases totaled $30 million on June 12,
2008. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we repurchased approximately 1.1 million shares.
In July 2008, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional one
million shares of our common stock. We used our working capital to fund the purchases under this
program. The timing and amount of repurchases were made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1
trading plan that was effective as of August 1, 2008. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008,
we repurchased approximately 91,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $2.7 million.
From
October 1, 2008 through October 30, 2008, we repurchased
approximately 722,000 shares of
our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $17.3 million (average cost of approximately
$23.92 per share). These purchases have completed the Companys stock purchase plan announced in
July 2008. Through October 30, 2008, we have repurchased approximately 1.9 million shares at an
aggregate purchase price of $50 million pursuant to the two repurchase plans announced during the
year.
At September 30, 2008, we had working capital of $347.8 million compared with $404.7 million
at December 31, 2007. At September 30, 2008, the parent company (Molina Healthcare, Inc.) had
cash and investments of approximately $83.4 million, including $18.5 million in auction rate
securities. Based on current projections for cash activity, we
believe that our cash resources, internally generated funds, and credit resources will be sufficient to
support our operations, regulatory requirements, and capital expenditures for at least the next 12
months. Although the Company believes it has adequate sources of
liquidity, the ongoing volatility and disruptions in the capital and
credit markets could affect the Companys ability to access
those markets for additional borrowings or increase costs associated
with borrowing funds.
Regulatory Capital and Dividend Restrictions
Our principal operations are conducted through our nine HMO subsidiaries operating in
California, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Washington. The HMOs are
subject to state laws that, among other things, require the maintenance of minimum levels of
statutory capital, as defined by each state, and may restrict the timing, payment, and amount of
dividends and other distributions that may be paid to Molina Healthcare, Inc. as the sole
stockholder of each of our HMOs.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, has established model rules
which, if adopted by a particular state, set minimum capitalization requirements for HMOs and other
insurance entities bearing risk for health care coverage. The requirements take the form of
risk-based capital, or RBC, rules. These rules, which vary slightly from state to state, have been
adopted in Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Utah, and Washington. California and Missouri
have not adopted RBC rules, but have established their own minimum capitalization requirements.
At September 30, 2008, our HMOs had aggregate statutory capital and surplus of approximately
$349.9 million, compared with the required minimum aggregate statutory capital and surplus of
approximately $209.2 million. All of our HMOs were in compliance with the minimum capital
requirements at September 30, 2008. We have the ability and commitment to provide additional
capital to each of our HMOs when necessary to ensure that they continue to meet statutory and
regulatory capital requirements.
30
Contractual Obligations
In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, we reported on our
contractual obligations as of that date. There have been no material changes to our contractual
obligations since that report.
Critical Accounting Policies
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we use estimates and assumptions that
may affect reported amounts and disclosures. The determination of our liability for claims and
medical benefits payable is particularly important to the determination of our financial position
and results of operations in any given period. This determination of our liability requires the
application of a significant degree of judgment by our management. As a result, the determination
of our liability for claims and medical benefits is subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.
Our medical care costs include amounts that have been paid by us through the reporting date,
as well as estimated liabilities for medical care costs incurred but not paid by us as of the
reporting date. Such medical care liabilities include, among other items, capitation payments owed
providers, unpaid pharmacy invoices, and various medically related administrative costs that have
been incurred but not paid. We use judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions for
determining the required estimates.
The most important element in estimating our medical care costs is our estimate for
fee-for-service claims which have been incurred but not paid by us. These fee-for-service costs
that have been incurred but have not been paid at the reporting date are collectively referred to
as medical costs that are Incurred But Not Reported, or IBNR. Our IBNR liability, as reported in
our balance sheet, represents our best estimate of the total amount of claims we will ultimately
pay with respect to claims that we have incurred as of the balance sheet date. We estimate our IBNR
monthly using actuarial methods based on a number of factors. Our estimated IBNR liability
represented $239.0 million of our total medical claims and benefits payable of $298.8 million as of
September 30, 2008. Excluding IBNR related to our Utah health plan, where we are primarily
reimbursed on a cost-plus basis, our IBNR liability at September 30, 2008 was $222.0 million.
The factors we consider when estimating our IBNR include, without limitation, claims receipt
and payment experience (and variations in that experience), changes in membership, provider billing
practices, health care service utilization trends, cost trends, product mix, seasonality, prior
authorization of medical services, benefit changes, known outbreaks of disease or increased
incidence of illness such as influenza, provider contract changes, changes to Medicaid fee
schedules, the incidence of high dollar or catastrophic claims, entry into new geographic markets,
and modifications and upgrades to our claims processing systems and practices. Our assessment of
these factors is then translated into an estimate of our IBNR liability at the relevant measuring
point through the calculation of a base estimate IBNR, a further reserve for adverse claims
development, and an estimate of the administrative costs of settling all claims incurred through
the reporting date. The base estimate of IBNR is derived through application of claims payment
completion factors and trended per member per month (PMPM) cost estimates.
For the fifth month of service prior to the reporting date and earlier, we estimate our
outstanding claims liability based on actual claims paid, adjusted for estimated completion
factors. Completion factors seek to measure the cumulative percentage of claims expense that will
have been paid for a given month of service as of the reporting date, based on historical payment
patterns.
The following table reflects the change in our estimate of claims liability as of September
30, 2008 that would have resulted had we changed our completion factors for the fifth through the
twelfth months preceding
September 30, 2008 by the percentages indicated. A reduction in the completion factor results
in an increase in medical claims liabilities. Our Utah health plan is excluded from these
calculations because the majority of its business is conducted under a cost-plus reimbursement
contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in |
(Decrease) Increase in Estimated |
|
Medical Claims and |
Completion Factors |
|
Benefits Payable |
|
|
(in thousands) |
(6)% |
|
$ |
52,384 |
|
(4)% |
|
|
34,923 |
|
(2)% |
|
|
17,461 |
|
2% |
|
|
(17,461 |
) |
4% |
|
|
(34,923 |
) |
6% |
|
|
(52,384 |
) |
31
For the four months of service immediately prior to the reporting date, actual claims paid are
not a reliable measure of our ultimate liability, given the inherent delay between the
patient/physician encounter and the actual submission of a claim for payment. For these months of
service, we estimate our claims liability based on trended PMPM cost estimates. These estimates are
designed to reflect recent trends in payments and expense, utilization patterns, authorized
services, and other relevant factors. The following table reflects the change in our estimate of
claims liability as of September 30, 2008 that would have resulted had we altered our trended PMPM
factors by the percentages indicated. An increase in the PMPM costs results in an increase in
medical claims liabilities. Our Utah HMO is excluded from these calculations.
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in |
|
(Decrease) Increase in |
Trended Per Member Per Month |
|
Medical Claims and |
Cost Estimates |
|
Benefits Payable |
|
|
(in thousands) |
(6)% |
|
$ |
(26,779 |
) |
(4)% |
|
|
(17,853 |
) |
(2)% |
|
|
(8,926 |
) |
2% |
|
|
8,926 |
|
4% |
|
|
17,853 |
|
6% |
|
|
26,779 |
|
Assuming a hypothetical 1% change in completion factors from those used in our calculation of
IBNR at September 30, 2008, pretax income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would increase
or decrease by approximately $8.7 million, or $0.19 per diluted share, net of tax. Assuming
a hypothetical 1% change in PMPM cost estimates from those used in our calculation of IBNR at
September 30, 2008, net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would increase or
decrease by approximately $4.5 million pretax, or $0.10 per diluted share, net of tax. The
corresponding figures for a 5% change in completion factors and PMPM
cost estimates would be $43.7
million pretax, or $0.96 per diluted share, net of tax, and
$22.3 million pretax, or $0.49 per
diluted share, net of tax, respectively. The net income per diluted
share estimates described above and following assume use of the combined federal and
state statutory tax rate of 38%.
It is important to note that any error in the estimate of either completion factors or trended
PMPM costs would usually be accompanied by an error in the estimate of the other component, and
that an error in one component would almost always compound rather than offset the resulting
distortion to net income. When completion factors are overestimated, trended PMPM costs tend to be
underestimated. Both circumstances will create an overstatement of net income. Likewise, when
completion factors are underestimated, trended PMPM costs tend to be overestimated, creating an
understatement of net income. In other words, errors in estimates involving both completion factors
and trended PMPM costs will act to drive estimates of claims liabilities and medical care costs in
the same direction. For example, if completion factors were overestimated by 1%, resulting in an
overstatement of net income by $5.4 million, it is likely that trended PMPM costs would be
underestimated, resulting in an additional overstatement of net income.
After we have established our base IBNR reserve through the application of completion factors
and trended PMPM cost estimates, we then compute an additional liability, which also uses actuarial
techniques, to account for adverse developments in our claims payments which the base actuarial
model is not intended to and does not account for. We refer to this additional liability as the
provision for adverse claims development. The provision for adverse claims development is a
component of our overall determination of the adequacy of our IBNR. It is intended to capture the
adverse development of factors such as known outbreaks of disease like influenza, our entry into
new geographic markets, our provision of services to new populations such as the aged, blind or
disabled (ABD), claims receipt and payment experience, changes in membership, cost trends, changes
to Medicaid fee schedules, incidence of high dollar or catastrophic claims, changes in provider
billing practices, health care service utilization trends, and modifications and upgrades to our
claims processing systems and practices. Because of the complexity of our business, the number of
states in which we operate, and the need to account for different health care benefit packages
among those states, we make an overall assessment of IBNR after considering the base actuarial
model reserves and the provision for adverse claims development. We also include in our IBNR
liability an estimate of the administrative costs of settling all claims incurred through the
reporting date. The development of IBNR is a continuous process that we monitor and refine on a
monthly basis as additional claims payment information becomes available. As additional information
becomes known to us, we adjust our actuarial model accordingly to estimate IBNR.
32
On a monthly basis, we review and update our estimated IBNR liability and the methods used to
determine that liability. Any adjustments, if appropriate, are reflected in the period known. While
we believe our current estimates are adequate, we have in the past been required to increase
significantly our claims reserves for periods previously reported and may be required to do so
again in the future. Any significant increases to prior period claims reserves would materially
decrease reported earnings for the period in which the adjustment is made.
In our judgment, the estimates for completion factors will likely prove to be more accurate
than trended PMPM cost estimates because estimated completion factors are subject to fewer
variables and unknowns in their determination. Completion factors are developed over long periods
of time, and are most likely to be affected by changes in claims receipt and payment experience and
by provider billing practices. Trended PMPM cost estimates, while affected by the same factors,
will also be influenced by health care service utilization trends, cost trends, product mix,
seasonality, prior authorization of medical services, benefit changes, outbreaks of disease or
increased incidence of illness, provider contract changes, changes to Medicaid fee schedules, the
incidence of high dollar or catastrophic claims, changes in membership, entry into new geographic
markets, and modifications and upgrades to our claims processing systems and practices. As
discussed above, however, errors in estimates involving trended PMPM costs will almost always be
accompanied by errors in estimates involving completion factors, and vice versa.
Assuming that base reserves have been adequately set, we believe that amounts ultimately paid
out should generally be between 8% and 10% less than the liability recorded at the end of the
period as a result of the inclusion in that liability of the allowance for adverse claims
development and the accrued cost of settling those claims. However, there can be no assurance that
amounts ultimately paid out will not be higher or lower than this 8% to 10% range, as shown by our
results in 2007 when the amounts ultimately paid out were less than the amount of our established
reserves by approximately 19%. As of September 30, 2008, we estimate that the total payout in
satisfaction of the liability established for claims and medical benefits payable at December 31,
2007 will be approximately 19% less than the amount originally recorded. This estimate may change
during the course of the year as more information becomes available.
The apparent overestimation of our liability for claims and medical benefits payable at
December 31, 2007 led to the recognition of a benefit from prior period claims development for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The overestimation of the claims liability at our Michigan
and Washington health plans was principally the cause of the recognition of a benefit from prior
period claims development. This was partially offset by the underestimation of our claims liability
at December 31, 2007 at our Missouri health plan:
|
|
|
In Michigan, we overestimated the upward trend in medical costs in the second half of
2007, principally due to claims processing difficulties during the third quarter of 2007
that exaggerated the upward trend in medical costs. |
|
|
|
|
In Washington, we did not fully account for reduced utilization of medical services in
the fourth quarter of 2007, thus overestimating our liability at December 31, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
In Missouri, we underestimated the upward trend in medical costs during the second half
of 2007 that was driven by an increase in the Medicaid fee schedule effective July 1, 2007.
Additionally, we underestimated the impact of the underpayment of certain hospital claims
in the second half of 2007. Additional payments were made on many of those claims in the
first quarter of 2008. |
The recognition of a benefit from prior period claims development did not have a material
impact on our consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In estimating our claims liability at September 30, 2008, we adjusted our base calculation to
take account of the impact of the following factors which we believe are reasonably likely to
change our final claims liability amount (some of the factors listed below were also factors
impacting our final claims liability amount at December 31, 2007):
|
|
|
Our assessment regarding the impact of some overpayments made to certain Ohio providers
in 2008 and 2007 and the impact of those overpayments on estimated medical cost trends. |
|
|
|
|
The impact of the increased incidence of respiratory illness in the first quarter of
2008 as compared to previous years. |
|
|
|
|
Costs associated with our newly acquired membership in Missouri, as well as the impact
of any difference between our claims payment policies and those used by the prior
management of our Missouri health plan. |
33
|
|
|
Increases in claims inventory at our Ohio health plan during the third quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Decreases in claims inventory at our California, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, and
Washington health plans during the third quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The addition, effective April 1, 2008, of approximately 35,000 CFC members to our Ohio
health plan. |
|
|
|
|
The addition, effective September 1, 2008, of approximately 4,000 ABD members to our
Ohio health plan. |
|
|
|
|
Our ability to accurately estimate the ultimate settlement amounts (if any) of certain
classes of claims currently in dispute, particularly at our Missouri and New Mexico heath
plans. |
Any absence of adverse claims development (as well as the expensing of the costs, through
general and administrative expense, to settle claims held at the start of the period) will lead to
the recognition of a benefit from prior period claims development in the period subsequent to the
date of the original estimate. However, that benefit will affect current period earnings only to
the extent that the replenishment of the reserve for adverse claims development (and the re-accrual
of administrative costs for the settlement of those claims) is less than the benefit recognized
from the prior period liability.
We seek to maintain a consistent claims reserving methodology across all periods. Accordingly,
any prior period benefit from an un-utilized reserve for adverse claims development would likely be
offset by the establishment of a new reserve in an approximately equal amount (relative to premium
revenue, medical care costs, and medical claims and benefits payable) in the current period, and
thus the impact on earnings for the current period would likely be minimal.
The following table presents the components of the change in our medical claims and benefits
payable for the periods indicated. The negative amounts displayed for components of medical care
costs related to prior years represent the amount by which our original estimate of claims and
benefits payable at the beginning of the period exceeded the actual amount of the liability based
on information (principally the payment of claims) developed since that liability was first
reported. The benefit of this prior period development may be offset by the addition of a reserve
for adverse claims development when estimating the liability at the end of the period (captured as
a component of medical care costs related to current year).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for |
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Balances at beginning of period |
|
$ |
311,606 |
|
|
$ |
290,048 |
|
|
$ |
290,048 |
|
Medical claims and benefits payable from business acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,876 |
|
Components of medical care costs related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
1,996,385 |
|
|
|
1,568,949 |
|
|
|
2,136,381 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
(59,854 |
) |
|
|
(49,705 |
) |
|
|
(56,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total medical care costs |
|
|
1,936,531 |
|
|
|
1,519,244 |
|
|
|
2,080,083 |
|
Payments for medical care costs related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year |
|
|
1,721,191 |
|
|
|
1,278,321 |
|
|
|
1,851,035 |
|
Prior years |
|
|
228,159 |
|
|
|
222,249 |
|
|
|
222,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
|
1,949,350 |
|
|
|
1,500,570 |
|
|
|
2,073,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at end of period |
|
$ |
298,787 |
|
|
$ |
308,722 |
|
|
$ |
311,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit from prior period as a percentage of balance at
beginning of period |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
Benefit from prior period as a percentage of premium
revenue |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Benefit from prior period as a percentage of total
medical care costs |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for |
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
the Year Ended |
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Days in claims payable |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Number of members at end of period |
|
|
1,239,000 |
|
|
|
1,070,000 |
|
|
|
1,149,000 |
|
Number of claims in inventory at end of period |
|
|
131,100 |
|
|
|
179,200 |
|
|
|
161,400 |
|
Billed charges of claims in inventory at end of period |
|
$ |
147,100 |
|
|
$ |
231,800 |
|
|
$ |
212,000 |
|
Claims in inventory per member at end of period |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Number of claims received during the period |
|
|
8,234,500 |
|
|
|
6,959,000 |
|
|
|
9,578,900 |
|
Billed charges of claims received during the period |
|
$ |
5,754,700 |
|
|
$ |
4,477,500 |
|
|
$ |
6,190,900 |
|
Inflation
We use various strategies to mitigate the negative effects of health care cost inflation.
Specifically, our health plans try to control medical and hospital costs through contracts with
independent providers of health care services. Through these contracted providers, our health plans
emphasize preventive health care and the appropriate use of specialty and hospital services. There
can be no assurance, however, that our strategies to mitigate health care cost inflation will be
successful. Competitive pressures, new health care and pharmaceutical product introductions,
demands from health care providers and customers, applicable regulations, or other factors may
affect our ability to control health care costs.
Compliance Costs
Our health plans are regulated by both state and federal government agencies. Regulation of
managed care products and health care services is an evolving area of law that varies from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Regulatory agencies generally have discretion to issue regulations
and interpret and enforce laws and rules. Changes in applicable laws and rules occur frequently.
Compliance with such laws and rules may lead to additional costs related to the implementation of
additional systems, procedures, and programs that we have not yet identified.
Forward Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, or Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or Securities Exchange Act. All statements, other than statements of
historical facts, that we include in this quarterly report may be deemed to be forward-looking
statements for purposes of the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act. We use the words
anticipate(s), believe(s), estimate(s), expect(s), intend(s), may, plan(s),
project(s), will, would and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements,
although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. We cannot guarantee
that we will actually achieve the plans, intentions, or expectations disclosed in our
forward-looking statements and, accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on our
forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results
or events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. You should read
these factors and the other cautionary statements as being applicable to all related
forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this quarterly report. We caution you that we do
not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements made by us. Forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results in
future periods to differ materially from those projected or contemplated as a result of, but not
limited to, the following factors:
|
|
|
the achievement of savings from the successful management of the medical care ratios of
our health plans; |
|
|
|
|
an increase in enrollment in both our Medicaid and Medicare populations consistent with
our expectations; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to reduce administrative costs in the event enrollment or revenue is lower
than expected; |
|
|
|
|
increased administrative costs in support of the Companys efforts to expand Medicare
membership; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to accurately estimate incurred but not reported medical costs; |
|
|
|
|
federal and state budgetary crises and difficulties in funding the government-sponsored
health care programs in which we participate due to current economic
conditions, particularly in the states of California, Michigan,
Missouri, and Ohio; |
35
|
|
|
the impact of the Rogers Amendment to the Deficit Reduction Act of
2005 regarding the rates to be paid to non-contracting hospitals by our California health
plan; |
|
|
|
|
the continuation and extension of the injunction regarding
provider rate reductions in California; |
|
|
|
|
changes in market interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
disruptions in the credit market and the availability of
credit on reasonable terms; |
|
|
|
|
the potential termination or expiration without renewal of the government contracts of
our health plans; |
|
|
|
|
the imposition of fines or assessments by state or federal regulators for perceived
operating deficiencies; |
|
|
|
|
our dependence upon a relatively small number of government contracts and subcontracts
for our revenue; |
|
|
|
|
limitations in our ability to control our medical costs and other operating expenses; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to our new Medicare Advantage plans, including retroactive risk
adjustments, governmental funding, compliance issues, and confusion regarding the new plans
among Medicare beneficiaries, providers, pharmacists, and regulators; |
|
|
|
|
the successful and cost-effective integration of Florida NetPASS and its members,
including risks related to our lack of prior operating experience in Florida; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of adequate financing to fund and/or capitalize our acquisitions and
start-up activities, including the current crisis in the credit markets and the resulting
inability of companies to borrow funds; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to the liquidity and value of our auction rate securities; |
|
|
|
|
the inability of the reinsurer to pay any of the insurance
claims under the life and annuity policies ceded to it by Molina
Healthcare Insurance Company; |
|
|
|
|
membership eligibility processes and methodologies; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in demographics, member utilization patterns, healthcare practices,
or healthcare technologies; |
|
|
|
|
high dollar claims related to catastrophic illness or conditions, increases in
respiratory illnesses, or increases in the number of premature infants among our plans
members; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to the continued solvency of our major providers and provider groups; |
|
|
|
|
failure to maintain effective, efficient, and secure information systems and claims
processing technology; |
|
|
|
|
the unfavorable resolution of pending litigation or arbitration; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the potential negative perception among regulators, governmental
representatives, and the public of abuses occurring within the Medicaid or Medicare managed
care sectors and the association or general attribution of such negative perceptions to us; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with our $200 million of Notes; |
|
|
|
|
epidemics such as the avian flu; |
|
|
|
|
changes to government laws and regulations or in the interpretation and enforcement of
those laws and regulations; and |
|
|
|
|
general economic and market conditions. |
Investors should refer to Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report, and to Part I, Item 1A of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, for a discussion of certain
risk factors which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results.
Given these risks and uncertainties, we can give no assurances that any results or events projected
or contemplated by our forward-looking statements will in fact occur and we caution investors not
to place undue reliance on these statements.
36
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, receivables, and restricted investments. We
invest a substantial portion of our cash in the CADRE Liquid Asset Fund and CADRE Reserve Fund
(CADRE Funds), a portfolio of highly liquid money market securities. Professional portfolio
managers operating under documented investment guidelines manage our investments. Restricted
investments are invested principally in certificates of deposit and U.S. treasury securities.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to payors
consisting principally of the governments of each state in which our HMO subsidiaries operate.
As of September 30, 2008, we held investments in auction rate securities, totaling $70.8
million, with a fair value of $63.8 million, which are required to be measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. Our auction rate securities are designated as available-for-sale securities and
are reflected at fair value. Prior to January 1, 2008, these securities were recorded at fair value
based on quoted prices in active markets (i.e., SFAS 157 Level 1 data). Liquidity for these auction
rate securities is typically provided by an auction process which allows holders to sell their
notes, and which resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, usually every 7,
28, or 35 days. However, due to recent events in the credit markets, the auction events for some of
these instruments failed during for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. An auction failure
means that the parties wishing to sell their securities could not be matched with an adequate
volume of buyers. Therefore, the fair values of these securities were estimated using a discounted
cash flow analysis or other type of valuation model as of September 30, 2008. These analyses
considered, among other things, the collateralization underlying the securities, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the expectation
of the next time the security would be expected to have a successful auction. The estimated values
of these securities were also compared, when possible, to valuation data with respect to similar
securities held by other parties.
As a result of the declines in fair value for our investments in auction rate securities,
which we deem to be temporary and attribute to liquidity issues rather than to credit issues, we
have recorded an unrealized loss of $6.9 million to accumulated other comprehensive income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. Substantially all of the $63.8 million in auction rate
security instruments held by us at September 30, 2008 were in securities collateralized by student
loans, which loans are guaranteed by the U.S. government. Due to our belief that the market for
these student loan collateralized instruments may take in excess of twelve months to fully recover,
we have classified these investments as non-current, and have included them in investments on the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, we
continue to earn interest on our auction rate security instruments. Any future fluctuation in fair
value related to these instruments that we deem to be temporary, including any recoveries of
previous write-downs, would be recorded to accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. If we
determine that any future valuation adjustment was other than temporary, we would record a charge
to earnings as appropriate.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: Our management, with the participation of
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has concluded, based upon its
evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules
and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There has been no change in our internal
control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2008 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over
financial reporting.
37
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The health care industry is subject to numerous laws and regulations of federal, state, and
local governments. Compliance with these laws and regulations can be subject to government review
and interpretation, as well as regulatory actions unknown and unasserted at this time. Penalties
associated with violations of these laws and regulations include significant fines and penalties,
exclusion from participating in publicly-funded programs, and the repayment of previously billed
and collected revenues.
We
are involved in legal actions in the ordinary course of business, some of which seek monetary
damages, including claims for punitive damages, which are not covered
by insurance. The outcome of such legal actions is inherently
uncertain. Nevertheless, we believe that these actions (including the
previously disclosed Starko and Ward litigation matters), when finally concluded and determined, are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
38
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Certain risk factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and
results of operations and you should carefully consider them. The following risk factors were
identified or reevaluated by the Company during the third quarter and are a supplement to those
risk factors included as part of Item 1A., Risk Factors, of the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on March 17, 2008, as updated by Item 1A of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008 and the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed with the SEC on July 30, 2008. |
|
The value of our investments is influenced by varying economic and market conditions, and a
decrease in value could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations, liquidity, and
financial condition. |
As
of September 30, 2008, we had investments totaling $227.5 million. Of
the $227.5 million total, $163.7 million are classified as current
assets, $63.8 million are classified as non-current assets, and all
of them are designated as available-for-sale investment securities.
Available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value, and the unrealized gains or losses are
included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income as a separate
component of stockholders equity,
unless the decline in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and we do not have the intent and
ability to hold such securities until their full cost can be recovered. For our available-for-sale
investments and held-to-maturity investments, if a decline in value is deemed to be
other-than-temporary and we do not have the intent and ability to hold such security until its full
cost can be recovered, the security is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired and it is
written down to fair value and the loss is recorded as an expense.
In accordance with applicable accounting standards, we review our investment securities to
determine if declines in fair value below cost are other-than-temporary. This review is subjective
and requires a high degree of judgment. We conduct this review on a quarterly basis, using both
quantitative and qualitative factors, to determine whether a decline in value is
other-than-temporary. Such factors considered include the length of time and the extent to which
market value has been less than cost, the financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer,
recommendations of investment advisors and forecasts of economic, market, or industry trends. This
review process also entails an evaluation of our ability and intent to hold individual securities
until they mature or full cost can be recovered.
The current economic environment and recent volatility of the securities markets increase the
difficulty of assessing investment impairment and the same influences tend to increase the risk of
potential impairment of these assets. As a result of the decline in
fair value of our investments in auction rate securities, we recorded
unrealized losses, net of tax at the combined federal and state
statutory rate, of $1.2 million and $4.3 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, to
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income. Over time, the economic and
market environment may further deteriorate or provide additional insight regarding the fair value
of certain securities, which could change our judgment regarding impairment. This could result in
realized losses relating to other-than-temporary declines recorded as an expense. Given the current
market conditions and the significant judgments involved, there is continuing risk that further
declines in fair value may occur and material other-than-temporary impairments may result in
realized losses in future periods which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
liquidity, and financial condition.
Adverse credit market conditions may have a material adverse effect on our liquidity or our ability
to obtain credit on acceptable terms or at all.
The
securities and credit markets have been experiencing significant volatility and disruption. In
some cases, the markets have exerted downward pressure on the availability of liquidity and credit
capacity. In the event we need access to additional capital to pay our operating expenses, make
payments on our indebtedness, pay capital expenditures, or fund acquisitions, our ability to obtain
such capital may be limited and the cost of any such capital, if available, may be significant. Our access to
additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general
availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to our industry, our credit ratings and
credit capacity, as well as the possibility that lenders could develop a negative perception of our
long- or short-term financial prospects. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if
regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If a combination of
these factors were to occur, our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient, and in
such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms.
39
The
re-implementation of the California provider rate reduction could
have an adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity, and
financial condition.
On
July 1, 2008, the California Department of Health Care Services
(DHCS) implemented a 10 percent payment reduction for providers of
various medical services under the Medi-Cal program. On August 18,
2008, the U.S. District Court issued a preliminary injunction to halt
certain portions of the rate reduction. As a result of the issuance of
the injunction, the payments being made to these medical providers as
of August 18, 2008 reverted to the rates that were being paid to them
prior to July 1st when the rate reduction was first implemented.
Litigation to have the rate reduction set aside is currently
continuing. In the event such litigation is unsuccessful, the
injunction is lifted, or the provider rate reduction is otherwise
re-implemented, the resulting impact on the rates paid to our
California health plan could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
40
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
As publicly announced on July 23, 2008, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up
to one million shares of our common stock. Purchases of common stock made by or on behalf of the
Company during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares That May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans |
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
July 1 July 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,000,000 |
|
August 1 August 31, 2008 |
|
|
20,402 |
|
|
$ |
29.9593 |
|
|
|
20,402 |
|
|
|
14,388,159 |
|
September 1 September 30, 2008 |
|
|
70,125 |
|
|
$ |
29.9761 |
|
|
|
70,125 |
|
|
|
12,283,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
90,527 |
|
|
$ |
29.9723 |
|
|
|
90,527 |
|
|
$ |
12,283,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
A list of exhibits required to be filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is set
forth in the Index to Exhibits, which immediately precedes such exhibits, and is incorporated
herein by this reference.
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOLINA HEALTHCARE, INC.
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph M. Molina, M.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph M. Molina, M.D. |
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, |
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Dated:
November 4, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John C. Molina, J.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Molina, J.D.
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
Dated:
November 4, 2008
42
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Title |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
43