e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM to
Commission file number: 0-49983
SCS TRANSPORTATION, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of incorporation)
|
|
48-1229851
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
4435 Main Street, Suite 930
Kansas City, Missouri
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
64111
(Zip Code) |
(816) 960-3664
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer
o Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Outstanding Shares at April 26, 2006 |
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
|
|
14,656,155 |
SCS TRANSPORTATION, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,219 |
|
|
$ |
16,865 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
130,531 |
|
|
|
126,824 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
36,271 |
|
|
|
30,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
172,021 |
|
|
|
174,245 |
|
Property and Equipment, at cost |
|
|
631,729 |
|
|
|
620,899 |
|
Less-accumulated depreciation |
|
|
283,447 |
|
|
|
275,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment |
|
|
348,282 |
|
|
|
345,533 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
30,530 |
|
|
|
30,530 |
|
Other Intangibles, net |
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
Other Noncurrent Assets |
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
554,852 |
|
|
$ |
554,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and checks outstanding |
|
$ |
45,152 |
|
|
$ |
54,941 |
|
Wages, vacations and employees benefits |
|
|
39,120 |
|
|
|
43,490 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
38,357 |
|
|
|
33,156 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
127,629 |
|
|
|
136,587 |
|
Other Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
117,931 |
|
|
|
109,913 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
58,062 |
|
|
|
58,062 |
|
Claims, insurance and other |
|
|
18,386 |
|
|
|
21,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
194,379 |
|
|
|
189,762 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
14,654,676 and 14,480,438 shares issued at
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
196,772 |
|
|
|
194,398 |
|
Deferred compensation trust, 97,937 and 87,597 shares of
common stock at cost at March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively |
|
|
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
37,673 |
|
|
|
35,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
232,844 |
|
|
|
228,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
554,852 |
|
|
$ |
554,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Income Statements
For the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating Revenue |
|
$ |
287,330 |
|
|
$ |
253,288 |
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and employees benefits |
|
|
158,733 |
|
|
|
140,687 |
|
Purchased transportation |
|
|
25,344 |
|
|
|
21,016 |
|
Operating expenses and supplies |
|
|
64,841 |
|
|
|
52,134 |
|
Operating taxes and licenses |
|
|
11,291 |
|
|
|
10,427 |
|
Claims and insurance |
|
|
8,904 |
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,313 |
|
|
|
11,669 |
|
Operating (gains) and losses |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
281,042 |
|
|
|
244,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
6,288 |
|
|
|
9,239 |
|
Nonoperating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating expenses, net |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
6,706 |
|
Income Tax Provision |
|
|
1,634 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
2,371 |
|
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
common shares outstanding - basic |
|
|
14,499 |
|
|
|
15,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
common shares outstanding - diluted |
|
|
14,842 |
|
|
|
15,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(721 |
) |
|
$ |
20,559 |
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment |
|
|
(22,194 |
) |
|
|
(16,803 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(21,215 |
) |
|
|
(15,439 |
) |
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowing of long-term debt |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,735 |
) |
Stock option exercises |
|
|
2,290 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from (used in) financing activities |
|
|
10,290 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(11,646 |
) |
|
|
3,310 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
16,865 |
|
|
|
7,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
5,219 |
|
|
$ |
10,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (received), net |
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
(6,967 |
) |
Interest paid |
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SCS
Transportation, Inc. and its two wholly owned regional transportation subsidiaries (together the
Company or SCST), Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. and Jevic Transportation, Inc.
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit by
independent registered public accountants. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring
adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and
cash flows for the interim periods included herein have been made. Certain information and note
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from
these financial statements. These interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information, the instructions to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of
Regulation S-X. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Organization
The Company provides regional and interregional less-than-truckload (LTL) services and selected
national LTL, truckload (TL) and time-definite services across the United States through two
subsidiaries, Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc. (Saia) and Jevic Transportation, Inc. (Jevic). For the
quarter ended March 31, 2006, Saia generated 71 percent and Jevic 29 percent of total revenue.
New Accounting Pronouncements
There are no new accounting pronouncements pending adoption as of March 31, 2006, which the Company
believes would have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year consolidated financial statements to
conform with the current presentation, specifically related to the cash flow presentation of stock
option exercises.
6
(2) Computation of Earnings Per Share
The calculation of basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share was as
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,371 |
|
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for basic earnings per share-
weighted average common shares |
|
|
14,499 |
|
|
|
15,059 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Effect of other common stock equivalents |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share-
adjusted weighted average common shares |
|
|
14,842 |
|
|
|
15,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Business Segment Information
The Company has two operating subsidiaries (Saia and Jevic) that are reportable segments. Each of
these segments is a strategic business unit offering different products and services.
The segments are managed separately because each requires different operating, technology and
marketing strategies. The Company evaluates financial performance primarily on operating income
and return on capital.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Intersegment transactions and interest charges are recorded at market rates.
The amounts shown as operating revenue under corporate and eliminations reflects the elimination
of revenue and purchased transportation costs for transportation services transactions between Saia
and Jevic. In addition to management, the holding company performs treasury and cash management,
investor relations, legal, internal audit, income tax and financial reporting functions as well as
maintaining long-term incentive plans and incurring certain other public company costs on behalf of
the operating subsidiaries. Such costs were $5.5 million and $1.7 million in the quarters ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively. Management fees and other corporate services are charged to
segments based on direct benefit received or allocated indirect benefit based on revenue. The
operating income amounts shown under corporate and eliminations in the table below reflect the
holding company costs incurred in excess of the allocations to the operating companies.
The following table summarizes the Companys operations by business segment (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saia |
|
|
Jevic |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
As of March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
401,859 |
|
|
$ |
150,506 |
|
|
$ |
2,487 |
|
|
$ |
554,852 |
|
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable assets |
|
$ |
389,076 |
|
|
$ |
150,516 |
|
|
$ |
15,149 |
|
|
$ |
554,741 |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
204,645 |
|
|
$ |
84,208 |
|
|
$ |
(1,523 |
) |
|
$ |
287,330 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
12,460 |
|
|
|
(2,341 |
) |
|
|
(3,831 |
) |
|
|
6,288 |
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenue |
|
$ |
166,965 |
|
|
$ |
86,323 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
253,288 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
8,963 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
9,239 |
|
7
(4) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. In
the opinion of management, the aggregate liability, if any, with respect to these actions will not
materially adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
(5) Stock-Based Compensation
For all stock option grants prior to January 1, 2003, stock-based compensation to employees is
accounted for based on the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations, including Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions
involving Stock Compensation.
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value method of recording stock option
expense under FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation as amended by FASB
Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. Under FASB Statement No. 123 the Company recognized stock
option expense prospectively for all stock option awards granted after January 1, 2003. Stock
option grants after January 1, 2003 are expensed over the vesting period based on the fair value at
the date the options are granted using the straight-line method.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payments (Statement 123(R)) Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the
approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123.
Statement 123(R) permits public companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:
|
1. |
|
A modified prospective method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with
the effective date (a) based on the requirements of Statement 123(R) for all share-based
payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of Statement
123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of Statement 123(R)
that remain unvested on the effective date. |
|
|
2. |
|
A modified retrospective method which includes the requirements of the modified
prospective method described above, but also permits entities to restate based on the
amounts previously recognized under Statement 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures
either (a) all prior periods presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of
adoption. |
The Company adopted Statement 123(R) using the modified prospective method. Although Statement
123(R) must be applied not only to new awards but to previously granted awards that are not fully
vested on the effective date, because the Company previously adopted Statement 123 and all options
granted prior to the adoption of Statement 123 are currently fully vested, there was no additional
compensation costs to be recognized for previously granted awards.
The Company adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective
January 1, 2003 using the prospective method described in FASB Statement No. 148. The Company uses
the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the fair value of stock options granted to employees
and will to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model under Statement 123(R).
Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation
cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. This
requirement reduces net operating cash flows and increases net financing cash flows. For the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, cash flows from financing activities were increased by $1.4
million and $0.5 million, respectively, for such excess tax deductions that would have been shown
in operating cash flows in periods prior to the adoption of Statement 123(R).
At March 31, 2006, the Company has reserved and remaining outstanding stock option grants for
474,646 shares of its common stock to certain management personnel of the Company and its operating
subsidiaries under the 2002 Substitute Stock Option Plan. As a result of the Spin-off, on
October 1, 2002, all Yellow stock options (Old Yellow Options) issued and outstanding to employees
of SCST were replaced with SCST stock options (New SCST Options) with an intrinsic value identical
to the value of the Old Yellow Options being replaced. The number of New SCST Options and their
exercise price was determined based on the relationship of the SCST stock price immediately after
the Spin-off and the Yellow stock price immediately prior to the Spin-off. The New SCST
8
Options expire ten years from the date the Old Yellow Options were originally issued by Yellow.
The New SCST Options were fully vested at December 31, 2004.
The shareholders of the Company have approved the Amended and Restated 2003 Omnibus Incentive Plan
(the 2003 Omnibus Plan) to allow the Company the ability to attract and retain outstanding
executive, managerial, supervisory or professional employees and non-employee directors. The
Company has reserved 424,000 shares of its common stock under the 2003 Omnibus Plan. The 2003
Omnibus Plan provides for the grant or award of stock options; stock appreciation rights;
restricted and unrestricted stock; and cash performance unit awards. Stock option awards to
employees are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys stock at
the date of grant; those stock option awards have cliff vesting at the end of three years of
continuous service and have a seven year contractual term. In addition, the 2003 Omnibus Plan
provides for the grant of shares of common stock to non-employee directors in lieu of at least 50
percent (and up to 100 percent) of annual cash retainers and provides for an annual grant to each
non-employee director of no more than 3,000 shares to each non-employee director. These share
awards generally vest immediately.
Shares issued to non-employee directors in lieu of annual cash retainers were zero for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Non-employee directors were also issued 215 and zero units
equivalent to shares in the Companys common stock under the Director Deferred Fee Plan during the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The non-employee director stock options
issued under the 2003 Omnibus Plan expire ten years from the date of grant; are exercisable six
months after the date of grant; and have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 220,106 and
290,901 shares, respectively, remain reserved and available under the provisions of the 2003
Omnibus Plan. The Company has a policy of issuing new shares to satisfy stock option exercises or
other awards issued under the 2003 Omnibus Plan and the 2002 Substitute Stock Option Plan.
The three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 had stock option compensation expense of less than
$0.1 million, included in salaries, wages and benefits. The Company recognized a tax benefit
consistent with the appropriate tax rates for each of the respective periods. As of March 31, 2006
there is unrecognized compensation expense of $0.8 million related to unvested stock options, which
is expected to be recognized over a period of 2.6 years.
The following table summarizes the activity of stock options for the three months ended March 31,
2006 for both employees and nonemployee directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
Life (years) |
|
|
(000s) |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
740,704 |
|
|
$ |
6.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
74,120 |
|
|
|
27.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(174,238 |
) |
|
|
5.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,540 |
) |
|
|
25.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
637,046 |
|
|
$ |
9.28 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
12,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
521,706 |
|
|
$ |
5.71 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
12,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005 was $3.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value
of options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $8.97 and $7.24,
respectively. The Company used the Black-Scholes-Merton formula in the determination of fair
value.
The following table summarizes the weighted average assumptions used in valuing options for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
3.90 |
% |
Expected life in years |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
41.10 |
% |
|
|
40.00 |
% |
Dividend rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table summarizes the status of the Companys unvested shares as of March 31, 2006 and
changes during the three months ended March 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
grant-date fair value |
|
Unvested at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
44,760 |
|
|
$ |
7.07 |
|
Granted |
|
|
74,120 |
|
|
|
8.97 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,540 |
) |
|
|
8.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
115,340 |
|
|
$ |
8.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Executive Overview
The Companys business is highly correlated to the general economy and, in particular, industrial
production. The Companys priorities are focused on increasing volume within existing geographies
while managing both the mix and yield of business to achieve increased profitability. The
Companys business is labor intensive, capital intensive and service sensitive. The Company looks
for opportunities to improve cost effectiveness, safety and asset utilization (primarily tractors
and trailers). Technology is important to supporting both customer service and operating
management. The Company grew revenue by 13.4 percent in the first quarter of 2006 over the first
quarter of 2005. Revenue growth at Saia was attributable to both improvement in yield (revenue per
hundred weight), including the effects of higher fuel surcharges, and growth in less-than-truckload
(LTL) tonnage. Revenue declines at Jevic resulted from quarter over quarter tonnage declines
slightly offset by very modest yield improvement, including the effects of fuel surcharges.
Consolidated operating income was $6.3 million for the first quarter of 2006, a decrease of $3.0
million from the prior-year quarter. First quarter of 2006 results include $3.0 million in
equity-based compensation charges as a result of the Companys increased stock price. In addition,
the holding company incurred $0.5 million in costs related to the resolution of a proxy matter and
fees associated with an ongoing strategic evaluation process. Saias first quarter 2006 operating
income improved 39 percent, led by strong LTL tonnage increases and solid LTL yield improvement.
Jevics volume decline produced unfavorable operating leverage, which more than offset progress on
cost management initiatives. The consolidated operating ratio (operating expenses divided by
operating revenue) was 97.8 percent in the first quarter of 2006 compared to 96.4 percent in the
first quarter of 2005. The first quarter of the year is typically the weakest due to seasonally
lower volumes and winter weather effects.
The Company used $0.7 million in cash for operating activities through the first three months of
the year versus generating $20.6 million in the prior-year period. The decrease in cash flow from
operating activities was primarily due to fluctuations in working capital accounts. Additionally,
the Company received a $7.0 million income tax refund in the first quarter of 2005. The Company
had net cash used in investing activities of $21.2 million during the first three months of 2006
for the purchase of property and equipment. The Companys cash from financing activities during
the first three months of 2006 included $8.0 million of borrowings on the Companys credit
agreement.
General
The following managements discussion and analysis describes the principal factors affecting the
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, as well as the critical accounting policies
of SCS Transportation, Inc. (also referred to as SCST and the Company). This discussion should
be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
and our 2005 audited consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. Those financial statements include additional
information about our significant accounting policies, practices and the transactions that underlie
our financial results.
SCST is an asset-based transportation company providing regional and interregional LTL services and
selected national LTL, truckload (TL) and time-definite service solutions to a broad base of
customers across the United States. Our operating subsidiaries are Saia Motor Freight Line, Inc.
(Saia), based in Duluth, Georgia, and Jevic Transportation, Inc. (Jevic), based in Delanco, New
Jersey.
Our business is highly correlated to the general economy and, in particular, industrial production.
It also is impacted by a number of other factors as detailed in the Forward Looking Statements
section of this Form 10-Q. The key factors that affect our operating results are the volumes of
shipments transported through our networks, as measured by our average daily shipments and tonnage;
the prices we obtain for our services, as measured by revenue per hundredweight (yield) and revenue
per shipment; our ability to manage our cost structure for capital expenditures and operating
expenses such as salaries, wages and benefits; purchased transportation; claims and insurance
expense; fuel and maintenance; and our ability to match operating costs to shifting volume levels.
The Company measures yield (revenue per hundred weight) both including and excluding fuel
surcharge. Fuel surcharges have remained in effect for several years and have become an
increasingly significant component of revenue. Fuel surcharge has also become a more integral part
of annual customer contract renewals, blurring the distinction between base price increases and
recoveries under fuel surcharge and other accessorial programs.
11
Results of Operations
SCS Transportation, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Selected Results of Operations and Operating Statistics
For the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
(in thousands, except ratios and revenue per hundredweight)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variance |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
06
v. 05 |
|
Operating Revenue |
|
$ |
287,330 |
|
|
$ |
253,288 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries, wages and employees benefits |
|
|
158,733 |
|
|
|
140,687 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
Purchased transportation |
|
|
25,344 |
|
|
|
21,016 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,313 |
|
|
|
11,669 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
84,652 |
|
|
|
70,677 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Operating Income |
|
|
6,288 |
|
|
|
9,239 |
|
|
|
(31.9 |
) |
Operating Ratio |
|
|
97.8 |
% |
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
|
Nonoperating Expense |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Working Capital |
|
|
44,392 |
|
|
|
53,918 |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
Cash Flow from (Used in) Operations |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
20,559 |
|
|
|
(103.5 |
) |
Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
21,215 |
|
|
|
15,439 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
Operating Statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTL Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saia |
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Jevic |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Total Tonnage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saia |
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
Jevic |
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
LTL Shipments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saia |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Jevic |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
Total Shipments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saia |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Jevic |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
LTL Revenue per hundredweight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saia |
|
|
11.30 |
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Jevic |
|
|
10.84 |
|
|
|
10.77 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Saia (excluding fuel surcharge) |
|
|
10.03 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Jevic (excluding fuel surcharge) |
|
|
9.59 |
|
|
|
9.90 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Total Revenue per hundredweight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saia |
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
|
9.51 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Jevic |
|
|
7.65 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Saia (excluding fuel surcharge) |
|
|
9.05 |
|
|
|
8.77 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Jevic (excluding fuel surcharge) |
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
|
6.83 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Quarter ended March 31, 2006 vs. quarter ended March 31, 2005
Revenue and volume
Consolidated revenue increased 13.4 percent to $287.3 million in the first quarter of 2006 from
both strong tonnage increases and revenue per hundred weight (yield) improvement at Saia. While
pricing remains competitive for both
operating subsidiaries, Saia results included improved quarter-over-quarter yields by 6.4 percent
while Jevic results included only a 3.1 percent improvement in yield, largely due to the effects of
fuel surcharges. Fuel surcharge revenue, which was 10.8 percent of total revenue in the first
quarter of 2006 compared to 7.8 percent of total revenue in the first quarter of 2005, is intended
to mitigate the Companys exposure to rising diesel prices.
Saia operating revenue was $204.6 million in the first quarter of 2006, an increase of 22.6 percent
over first quarter 2005 operating revenue of $167.0 million. Saia operating revenue excluding fuel
surcharge was $183.0 million in
12
the first quarter of 2006, up 18.9 percent from $153.9 million in
the first quarter of 2005. The revenue growth rate at Saia strengthened over the fourth quarter of
2005. Saias growth occurred across all regions and within each of the months of the quarter,
particularly January. LTL revenue per hundredweight (a measure of yield) increased 6.2 percent to
$11.30 per hundredweight for the first quarter of 2006. LTL tonnage was up 15.2 percent to 0.8
million tons and LTL shipments were up 14.1 percent to 1.5 million shipments. Management believes
that Saia continues to grow volume and increase yields through high quality service for its
customers, growth in value added services, like Xtreme Guarantee, general economic growth and
industry consolidation. Approximately 75 percent of Saias revenue is subject to individual
customer price adjustment negotiations that occur intermittently throughout the year. The
remaining 25 percent of revenue is subject to the annual general rate increase. On April 3, 2006,
Saia implemented a 5.9 percent general rate increase for customers comprising this 25 percent of
revenue compared to a 5.9 percent general rate increase on May 2, 2005. Competitive factors,
customer turnover and mix changes impact the extent to which customer rate increases are retained
over time.
Jevic had operating revenue of $84.2 million in the first quarter of 2006, a 2.5 percent decrease
from $86.3 million in the first quarter of 2005. Jevic operating revenue excluding fuel surcharge
was $74.7 million in the first quarter of 2006, down 6.1 percent from $79.6 million in the first
quarter of 2005. Jevics revenue decline is due to a decrease in LTL and truckload volumes. Jevic
total revenue per hundredweight increased 3.1 percent to $7.65 per hundredweight largely due to
increased fuel surcharge revenue. Jevics total tonnage decreased 4.7 percent to 0.5 million tons
and shipments were down 7.0 percent to 0.2 million shipments compared to the prior-year quarter.
At Jevic, total tonnage comparisons deteriorated as the quarter progressed primarily in terms of
truckload tons per day. After some progress in the fourth quarter of 2005 and early January 2006,
LTL tonnage trends then deteriorated throughout the remainder of the quarter, stabilizing at the
end of March. Management believes the decline in tonnage was impacted by a combination of
increased competitive pressure following recent corporate publicity, an unseasonably warm winter
which hurt its freeze protection business and excess truckload capacity. Approximately 60 percent
of Jevics revenue is subject to individual customer price adjustment negotiations that occur
intermittently throughout the year. The remaining 40 percent of revenue is subject to the annual
general rate increase. On April 24, 2006, Jevic implemented a 5.9 percent general rate increase
for customers comprising this 40 percent of revenue compared to a 5.6 percent general rate increase
on June 6, 2005. Competitive factors, customer turnover and mix changes impact the extent to which
customer rate increases are retained over time.
Operating expenses and margin
Consolidated operating income decreased 31.9 percent to $6.3 million. Improved performance at Saia
during the first quarter was more than offset by lower margins at Jevic and higher consolidated
equity-based compensation expense. First quarter 2006 results include $3.0 million in equity-based
compensation charges as a result of the Companys increased stock price and performance relative to
SCSTs peers compared to a benefit of $0.2 million in the prior-year quarter. In addition, the
holding company incurred $0.5 million in costs related to the resolution of a proxy matter and fees
associated with an ongoing strategic evaluation process. Consolidated operating results were
negatively impacted by lower operating margins at Jevic due primarily to a tonnage decline, which
produced unfavorable operating leverage. The first quarter of 2006 operating ratio (operating
expenses divided by operating revenue) was 97.8 percent, a 140 basis point decrease from 96.4
percent for the first quarter of 2005. Higher fuel prices (exclusive of a $0.8 million increase in
operating taxes and licenses related to fuel), in conjunction with volume changes, caused $9.3
million of the increase in operating expenses and supplies. Purchased transportation expenses
increased 20.6 percent reflecting both increased utilization driven by volume increases at Saia and
increased cost per mile largely driven by both capacity constraints and fuel price increases.
Increased revenues from the fuel surcharge program offset the effect of these fuel price increases.
Saia had operating income of $12.5 million in the first quarter of 2006 up 39.0 percent from $9.0
million in the first quarter of 2005. The operating ratio at Saia was 93.9 percent in the current
quarter, a 70 basis point improvement from the first quarter of 2005. Saia improved
quarter-over-quarter operating income through increased tonnage, improved prices and overall cost
effectiveness. Saia experienced increased salaries and wages and purchased transportation expense
in line with volume increases, higher wage rates and price increases. Saias wage rates averaged
2.9 percent higher in the first quarter of 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005. In
addition, current quarter maintenance expense at Saia was $1.3 million higher than in the
prior-year first quarter. Saia is still in the
process of completing its insurance claims related to the hurricanes in the third quarter of 2005;
the remaining insurance recovery will be recognized upon reaching a negotiated settlement for the
remaining claims. During the first quarter of 2006, no additional benefit was recognized in
connection with these claims.
Jevic had an operating loss of $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2006, down from operating
income of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2005. Current-quarter results were unfavorably
impacted by a tonnage decline, producing unfavorable operating leverage, which more than offset
progress on cost management initiatives. In addition, as a
13
result of the lower business levels,
Jevic reduced its workforce by approximately 8 percent during the quarter through a combination of
attrition and layoffs that resulted in severance costs of about $0.2 million in the current
quarter. Additionally, Jevics modest yield decline excluding fuel surcharge effects and increased
wages and benefit costs contributed to the operating income decline. Wage rates averaged 3.6
percent higher in the first quarter of 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005 including the
impacts of planned wage increases and other mix changes. The operating ratio at Jevic was 102.8
percent for the first quarter of 2006 compared to 99.4 percent for the first quarter of 2005.
Net holding company operating expenses for the first quarter of 2006 were $3.8 million in excess of
costs allocated to the operating companies compared to $0.2 million in excess of costs allocated in
the first quarter of 2005. The increase in net holding company operating expenses was primarily
due to $3.0 million in equity-based compensation charges compared to a benefit of $0.2 million in
the first quarter of 2005. The Companys long-term incentive plans expense is tied to the
Companys stock price performance versus a peer group and the deferred compensation plans expense
is tied to changes in the Companys stock price. During the quarter, the Company recorded $2.2
million in expense under its long-term incentive plans, to increase the accrual to $3.0 million at
March 31, 2006 for the pro-rata performance period-to-date from below target level performance to
slightly less than the maximum payout under the plans, which is two times target level payout.
Approximately one-half of the March 31, 2006 accrual represents estimated payments in 2007 with the
remainder to be paid in 2008 and 2009. The second component of equity compensation results from
the effect of increases in the Companys stock price on accounting for Company shares held in
deferred compensation plans. While generally accepted accounting principles require mark-to-market
of the deferred compensation liability, it does not allow the Company to recognize appreciation of
Company stock held by employee participants in these plans. This non-cash charge was $0.8 million
for the quarter. In addition, the holding company incurred $0.5 million in costs related to the
resolution of a proxy matter and fees associated with an ongoing strategic evaluation process.
These costs included fees to investment bankers, legal fees and other miscellaneous items.
Other
Substantially all SCST nonoperating expenses represent interest expense which was $2.5 million for
the first quarter of 2006, up $0.1 million from the first quarter of 2005. Other, net decreased by
$0.3 million primarily due to the first quarter of 2005 including $0.2 million in costs related to
the amendment of the Credit Agreement. The consolidated effective tax rate was 40.8 percent for
the three-months ended March 31, 2006 consistent with the consolidated effective tax rate of the
three-months ended March 31, 2005. The notes to the 2005 audited consolidated financial statements
included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 provide an analysis of the annual
income tax provision and the effective tax rate.
Net income was $2.4 million or $0.16 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2006 compared to net
income of $4.0 million or $0.26 per diluted share in the first quarter of 2005.
Working capital/capital expenditures
Working capital at March 31, 2006 was $44.4 million, which decreased from working capital at March
31, 2005 of $53.9 million. The decrease in working capital is due to a lower cash balance and an
increase in current maturities of long-term debt at March 31, 2006 primarily used to fund investing
and financing activities for the twelve months ended March 31, 2006. Cash flows used in operating
activities were $0.7 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2006 vs. cash flows from
operating activities of $20.6 million for the three-months ended March 31, 2005. The decrease in
cash flows from operations was due to decreases in accounts payable and wages, vacations and
employee benefits in addition to seasonal increases in accounts receivable and working capital
needs to fund capital expenditures earlier in the year during 2006 than 2005. Additionally, cash
flows from operations in 2005 included the receipt of a $7.0 million income tax refund. For the
three-months ended March 31, 2006 cash used in investing activities was $21.2 million versus $15.4
million in the prior-year three-month period. The 2006 acquisition of property and equipment
includes growth capital at Saia as well as replacement revenue equipment and technology equipment
and software. For the three-months ended March 31, 2006, cash from financing activities was $10.3
million versus cash used in financing activities of $1.8 million for the prior-year three months.
Current quarter
financing activities included a $8.0 million net increase in total debt under the revolving credit
facility to fund capital expenditure requirements during the first quarter of 2006.
Outlook
Our business remains highly correlated to the general economy, and in particular industrial
production. For 2006, we anticipate improved profitability at Saia due to anticipated favorable
economic conditions, continued growth in our existing geography and subsidiary-specific profit
improvement initiatives. These initiatives include yield improvement, gains in cost management,
productivity and asset utilization that collectively seek to offset anticipated
14
structural cost
increases in wages, healthcare costs and other expense categories. With respect to Jevic,
profitability improvement is dependent upon reversing first quarter volume weakness, further
improving yields and revenue quality while continuing to progress cost management and efficiency
initiatives.
In 2006, we will continue to focus on providing top quality service, improving safety performance
and investing in management and infrastructure for future growth and profitability improvement.
Saia continues to evaluate opportunities to grow and further increase profitability. Actual
results for 2006 will depend upon a number of factors, including the continued strength of the
economy, our ability to match capacity with shifting volume levels, competitive pricing pressures,
cost and availability of drivers and purchased transportation, insurance claims, regulatory changes
and successful implementation of subsidiary-specific profit improvement initiatives. In addition,
the Board of Directors has retained an investment banking firm to explore strategic alternatives to
enhance shareholder value. There can be no assurance this process will result in any transaction.
The Company does not intend to disclose developments with respect to the exploration of strategic
alternatives unless and until the Board of Directors has approved a specific transaction or course
of action.
See Forward-Looking Statements for a more complete discussion of potential risks and
uncertainties that could materially affect our future performance.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion
of recent accounting pronouncements.
Financial Condition
SCST liquidity needs arise primarily from capital investment in new equipment, land and structures
and information technology, letters of credit required under insurance programs, as well as funding
working capital requirements.
The Companys long-term debt at March 31, 2006 includes $100 million in Senior Notes, under a $150
million Master Shelf Agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and certain of its
affiliates that are unsecured with a fixed interest rate of 7.38 percent. Payments due under the
Senior Notes are interest only until June 30, 2006 and at that time semi-annual principal payments
begin, with the final payment due December 2013. Under the terms of the Senior Notes, SCST must
maintain several financial covenants including a maximum ratio of total indebtedness to earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (EBITDAR), a minimum interest coverage
ratio and a minimum tangible net worth, among others. At March 31, 2006, SCST was in compliance
with these covenants. In addition, SCST has third party borrowings of approximately $14.0 million
in subordinated notes and $0.9 million in seller notes.
SCST also entered into a $50 million (amended November 2004 to $75 million and in January 2005 to
$110 million) Agented Revolving Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement) with Bank of Oklahoma,
N.A., as agent. The Credit Agreement was amended in January 2005 to increase availability and the
Companys capacity for letters of credit in support of self-insured retentions for casualty and
workers compensation claims and achieve greater flexibility for potential future acquisitions.
The amended $110 million Credit Agreement is unsecured with an interest rate based on LIBOR or
prime at the Companys option, plus an applicable spread, in certain instances, and matures in
January 2008. At March 31, 2006, SCST had $8.0 million in borrowings under the Credit Agreement,
$43.9 million in letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Agreement and availability of $58.1
million. The available portion of the Credit Agreement may be used for future capital
expenditures, working capital and letter of credit requirements as needed. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, SCST must maintain several financial covenants including a maximum ratio of total
indebtedness to EBITDAR, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a minimum tangible net worth, among
others. At March 31, 2006, SCST was in compliance with these covenants.
At March 31, 2006, the Companys former parent company (Yellow) provided guarantees on behalf of
SCST primarily for open workers compensation claims and casualty claims incurred prior to March 1,
2000. Under the Master Separation and Distribution Agreement entered into in connection with the
Spin-off, SCST pays Yellows actual cost of any collateral it provides to insurance underwriters in
support of these claims through October 2005
after which time it is cost plus 100 basis points through October 2007. At March 31, 2006, the
portion of collateral allocated by Yellow to SCST in support of these claims was $2.6 million.
Projected net capital expenditures for 2006 are approximately $110 million including several
strategic real estate opportunities within Saias existing network. This represents an
approximately $56 million increase from 2005 net capital expenditures for property and equipment.
Approximately $66.5 million of the remaining 2006 capital budget was committed at March 31, 2006.
Net capital expenditures pertain primarily to replacement of revenue equipment at both subsidiaries
and additional investments in information technology, land and structures. Approximately $95
million of 2006 projected net capital expenditures applies to Saia with the remaining approximately
$15 million for
15
Jevic. Projected capital expenditures for 2006 could exceed this level if Saia is
successful in executing its geographic expansion objective.
The Company has historically generated cash flows from operations that have funded its capital
expenditure requirements. Cash flows from operations were $83.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005, which were $29.7 million more than 2005 net capital expenditures for acquisition
of property and equipment. Cash flows used in operations were $0.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 reflecting the seasonally low quarter and were $21.9 million less than net
capital expenditures for the quarter. Cash flows used in operating activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 decreased $21.3 million compared to the prior year quarter primarily as a
result of decreases in accounts payable and accrued claims and a $7.0 million tax refund received
in the first quarter of 2005. The timing of capital expenditures can largely be managed around the
seasonal working capital requirements of the Company. The Company has adequate sources of capital
to meet short-term liquidity needs through its cash ($5.2 million at March 31, 2006) and
availability under its revolving credit facility ($58.1 million at March 31, 2006). In addition to
these sources of liquidity, the Company has $50 million under its long-term debt facilities, which
is available to fund other longer-term strategic investments. Future operating cash flows are
primarily dependent upon the Companys profitability and its ability to manage its working capital
requirements, primarily accounts receivable, accounts payable and wage and benefit accruals. The
Company has the ability to adjust its capital expenditures in the event of a shortfall in
anticipated operating cash flows. The Company believes its current capital structure and
availability under its borrowing facilities along with anticipated cash flows from future
operations will be sufficient to fund planned replacements of revenue equipment and investments in
technology. Additional sources of capital may be needed to fund future long-term strategic growth
initiatives.
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, our operating
leases are not recorded in our balance sheet; however, the future minimum lease payments are
included in the Contractual Cash Obligations table below. See the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for
additional information. In addition to the principal amounts disclosed in the tables below, the
Company has interest obligations of approximately $6.7 million for 2006 and decreasing for each
year thereafter, based on borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2006.
Contractual Cash Obligations
The following tables set forth a summary of our contractual cash obligations and other commercial
commitments as of March 31, 2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by year |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Contractual cash obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of credit (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
114.9 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual
obligations |
|
$ |
86.3 |
|
|
$ |
29.5 |
|
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.4 |
|
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
$ |
48.7 |
|
|
$ |
235.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 4 to the audited consolidated financial statements in Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes commitments of $73.4 million for capital expenditures. |
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of commitment expiration by year |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Other commercial commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available line of credit |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58.1 |
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
Surety bonds |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial
commitments |
|
$ |
48.6 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
58.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies And Estimates
SCST makes estimates and assumptions in preparing the consolidated financial statements that
affect reported amounts and disclosures therein. In the opinion of management, the accounting
policies that generally have the most significant impact on the financial position and results of
operations of SCST include:
|
|
Claims and Insurance Accruals. SCST has self-insured retention
limits generally ranging from $250,000 to $2,000,000 per claim for
medical, workers compensation, auto liability, casualty and cargo
claims. For only the policy year March 2003 through February
2004, the Company has an aggregate exposure limited to an
additional $2,000,000 above its $1,000,000 per claim deductible
under its auto liability program. The liabilities associated with
the risk retained by SCST are estimated in part based on
historical experience, third-party actuarial analysis,
demographics, nature and severity, past experience and other
assumptions. The liabilities for self-funded retention are
included in claims and insurance reserves based on claims
incurred, with liabilities for unsettled claims and claims
incurred but not yet reported being actuarially determined with
respect to workers compensation claims and with respect to all
other liabilities, estimated based on managements evaluation of
the nature and severity of individual claims and historical
experience. However, these estimated accruals could be
significantly affected if the actual costs of SCST differ from
these assumptions. A significant number of these claims typically
take several years to develop and even longer to ultimately
settle. These estimates tend to be reasonably accurate over time;
however, assumptions regarding severity of claims, medical cost
inflation, as well as specific case facts can create short-term
volatility in estimates. |
|
|
Revenue Recognition and Related Allowances. Revenue is recognized
on a percentage-of-completion basis for shipments in transit while
expenses are recognized as incurred. In addition, estimates
included in the recognition of revenue and accounts receivable
include estimates of shipments in transit and estimates of future
adjustments to revenue and accounts receivable for billing
adjustments and collectibility. |
|
|
|
Revenue is recognized in a systematic process whereby estimates of shipments in transit are
based upon actual shipments picked up, scheduled day of delivery and current trend in average
rates charged to customers. Since the cycle for pick up and delivery of shipments is
generally 1-3 days, typically less than 5 percent of a total months revenue is in transit at
the end of any month. Estimates for credit losses and billing adjustments are based upon
historical experience of credit losses, adjustments processed and trends of collections.
Billing adjustments are primarily made for discounts and billing corrections. These estimates
are continuously evaluated and updated; however, changes in economic conditions, pricing
arrangements and other factors can significantly impact these estimates. |
|
|
Depreciation and Capitalization of Assets. Under the SCST
accounting policy for property and equipment, management
establishes appropriate depreciable lives and salvage values for
SCSTs revenue equipment (tractors and trailers) based on their
estimated useful lives and estimated fair values to be received
when the equipment is sold or traded in. These estimates are
routinely evaluated and updated when circumstances warrant.
However, actual depreciation and salvage values could differ from
these assumptions based on market conditions and other factors. |
|
|
Recovery of Goodwill. In connection with its acquisition in 2004,
SCST allocated purchase price based on independent appraisals of
intangible assets and real property and managements estimates of
valuations of other tangible assets. Annually, SCST assesses
goodwill impairment by applying a fair value based test. This
fair value based test involves assumptions regarding the long-term
future performance of the operating subsidiaries of SCST, fair
value of the assets and liabilities of SCST, cost of capital rates
and other assumptions. However, actual recovery of remaining
goodwill could differ from these assumptions based on |
17
|
|
market conditions and other factors. In the event remaining goodwill is
determined to be impaired a charge to earnings would be required. |
|
|
|
Equity-based Incentive Compensation. The Company
maintains long-term incentive compensation
arrangements in the form of stock options and
cash-based awards. The criteria for the cash-based
awards are SCSTs total shareholder return versus a
peer group of companies over a three year performance
period. The Company accrues for cash-based award
expenses based on performance criteria from the
beginning of the performance period through the
reporting date. This results in the potential for
significant adjustments from period to period that
cannot be predicted. The Company accounts for stock
options in accordance with Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 123R with option
expense amortized over the three year vesting period
based on the Black-Scholes-Merton fair value at the
date the options are granted. See discussion of
adoption of Statement No. 123R in note 5 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements contained
herein. |
These accounting policies, and others, are described in further detail in the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires management to adopt accounting policies and make significant
judgments and estimates to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in the financial statements. In
many cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques that could be used. We maintain
a thorough process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the
appropriateness of the many estimates that are required to prepare the financial statements.
However, even under optimal circumstances, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing
circumstances and the receipt of new or better information.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Report, including those contained in Results of Operations, Outlook
and Financial Condition are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of
operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of SCST. Words such as
anticipate, estimate, expect, project, intend, may, plan, predict, believe and
similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We use such
forward-looking statements regarding our future financial condition and results of operations and
our business operations in this Form 10-Q. Investors should not place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements reflect the present expectation of
future events of our management and are subject to a number of important factors, risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
described in the forward-looking statements. These factors and risks include, but are not limited
to, general economic conditions; the effects and outcomes of strategic evaluations; cost and
availability of qualified drivers, fuel, purchased transportation, property, revenue equipment and
other operating assets; governmental regulations, including but not limited to Hours of Service,
engine emissions, compliance with recent legislation requiring companies to evaluate their internal
control over financial reporting and Homeland Security; dependence on key employees; inclement
weather; labor relations; integration risks; effectiveness of company-specific performance
improvement initiatives; competitive initiatives and pricing pressures; terrorism risks;
self-insurance claims, equity-based compensation and other expense volatility; the Companys
determination from time to time whether to purchase any shares under the repurchase program; and
other financial, operational and legal risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the
Companys SEC filings. These factors and risks are described in Item 1A: Risk Factors of the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for December 31, 2005, as updated by Item 1A of the Form 10-Q.
As a result of these and other factors, no assurance can be given as to our future results and
achievements. Accordingly, a forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of
future events or circumstances, and those future events or circumstances may not occur. You should
not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this
Report. We are under no obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
SCST is exposed to a variety of market risks, including the effects of interest rates and fuel
prices. The detail of SCSTs debt structure is more fully described in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements set forth in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
To help mitigate our risk to rising fuel prices, Saia and Jevic
18
each have implemented fuel surcharge programs. These programs are well established within the
industry and customer acceptance of fuel surcharges remains high. Since the amount of fuel
surcharge is based on average national diesel fuel prices and is reset weekly, exposure of SCST to
fuel price volatility is significantly reduced.
The following table provides information about SCST third-party financial instruments as of March
31, 2006. The table presents principal cash flows (in millions) and related weighted average
interest rates by contractual maturity dates. The fair value of the fixed rate debt was estimated
based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturity date |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
|
$ |
48.4 |
|
|
$ |
114.0 |
|
|
$ |
114.9 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
7.38 |
% |
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
|
7.35 |
% |
|
|
7.35 |
% |
|
|
7.32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Quarterly Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and
procedures (Disclosure Controls). The controls evaluation was performed under the supervision and
with the participation of management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
Based upon the controls evaluation, the Companys CEO and CFO have concluded that, subject to the
limitations noted below, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
the Companys Disclosure Controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that material
information relating to SCST and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management,
including the CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when SCSTs periodic reports are being
prepared.
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report, there were no changes in internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Quarterly Report are certifications of the CEO and the
CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). This Controls and Procedures section includes the information concerning the
controls evaluation referred to in the certifications and it should be read in conjunction with the
certifications.
Definition of Disclosure Controls
Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the Companys reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported timely. Disclosure Controls are also designed to ensure that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Companys Disclosure Controls include
components of its internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of SCSTs financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that its Disclosure Controls
or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control systems objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system
must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of
simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons,
by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. Because of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may
occur and not be detected.
20
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings None
Item 1A. Risk Factors Risk Factors are described in Item 1A: Risk Factors of the Companys
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and there have been no material
changes.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units) |
|
|
Dollar Value) of |
|
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Purchased under |
|
|
|
(or Units) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans or |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
(or Unit) |
|
|
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,250 |
(2) |
|
$ |
27.09 |
(2) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
$ |
7,097,296 |
(1) |
February 1, 2006 through
February 28, 2006 |
|
|
9,500 |
(3) |
|
|
26.31 |
(3) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
7,097,296 |
(1) |
March 1, 2006 through
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,300 |
(4) |
|
|
27.44 |
(4) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
7,097,296 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs are purchased on the open market in
accordance with the Companys $20,000,000 stock repurchase program that was announced on May 3,
2005. Shares purchased by the SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan were open market purchases.
For more information on the SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan see the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-103661) filed on March 7, 2003 and the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. There were no purchases of shares by the Company
for the period January 1, 2006 through March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
The SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan sold 750 shares of SCST stock on the open market
at $27.93 per share during the period of January 1, 2006 through January 31, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
The SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan sold 970 shares of SCST stock on the open market
at $26.03 per share during the period of February 1, 2006 through February 28, 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
The SCST Executive Capital Accumulation Plan sold no shares of SCST stock on the open market
during the period of March 1, 2006 through March 31, 2006. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) On April 20, 2006, SCST held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders
(b) |
|
The following directors were elected for three-year terms with the indicated number of votes
set forth below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
Herbert A. Trucksess, III |
|
|
12,382,025 |
|
|
|
157,004 |
|
James A. Olson |
|
|
12,483,894 |
|
|
|
55,135 |
|
Jeffrey C. Ward |
|
|
12,274,736 |
|
|
|
264,293 |
|
21
Continuing Directors:
Linda J. French
John J. Holland
William F. Martin, Jr.
Bjorn E. Olsson
Douglas W. Rockel
(c) |
|
The proposal for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Independent Auditors for
2006 was voted on and approved at the meeting by the following vote: For: 12,436,040,
Against: 98,315, Abstain: 4,674. |
Item 5. Other Information None
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of SCS Transportation, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form
10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of SCS Transportation, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 of SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983)
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement between SCS Transportation, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC
dated as of September 30, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
22
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
SCS TRANSPORTATION, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James J. Bellinghausen |
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Bellinghausen |
|
|
Vice President of Finance and |
Date: April 28, 2006
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
23
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of SCS Transportation, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form
10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of SCS Transportation, Inc. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 of SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983)
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Rights Agreement between SCS Transportation, Inc. and Mellon Investor Services LLC
dated as of September 30, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
SCS Transportation, Inc.s Form 10-Q (File No. 0-49983) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
E-1