f08_10k.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
fiscal year
ended: February
2, 2008
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from: __________________________ to
__________________________
Commission file
number: 000-20969
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization
|
20-8159608
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
451 Industrial Lane,
Birmingham, Alabama 35211
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
205-942-4292
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common
Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share
|
|
NASDAQ
Stock Market, LLC
|
Title
of Class
|
|
Name
of each exchange on which
registered
|
Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
|
NONE
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
|
Yes
|
|
|
No
|
o
|
|
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form
10-K. ____
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
|
|
Accelerated
filer
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
o |
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
The
aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant (assuming for purposes of this calculation that all executive
officers and directors are “affiliates”) was $737,818,499 on August 3, 2007,
based on the closing sale price of $23.72 at August 3, 2007 for
the Common Stock on such date on the NASDAQ National Market.
The
number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, as of March 28,
2008 was 28,401,206.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The
information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity
compensation plans called for in Item 5 of Part II and the information called
for in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III are incorporated by reference
from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, to be held June 2, 2008. Registrant’s definitive
Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
before April 24, 2008.
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC.
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Item
|
1.
|
|
5
|
Item
|
1A.
|
|
9
|
Item
|
1B.
|
|
13
|
Item
|
2.
|
|
13
|
Item
|
3.
|
|
13
|
Item
|
4.
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
5.
|
|
15
|
Item
|
6.
|
|
18
|
Item
|
7.
|
|
19
|
Item
|
7A.
|
|
27
|
Item
|
8.
|
|
28
|
Item
|
9.
|
|
51
|
Item
|
9A.
|
|
51
|
Item
|
9B.
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
10.
|
|
52
|
Item
|
11.
|
|
52
|
Item
|
12.
|
|
52
|
Item
|
13.
|
|
52
|
Item
|
14.
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
|
15.
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
A
warning about Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains “forward-looking
statements” as that term is used in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Forward-looking statements address future events, developments and
results. They include statements preceded by, followed by or including words
such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “target” or
“estimate.” For example, our forward-looking statements include
statements regarding:
|
·
|
our
anticipated sales, including comparable store net sales changes, net sales
growth and earnings;
|
|
·
|
our
growth, including our plans to add, expand or relocate stores and square
footage growth, our market’s ability to support such growth and the
suitability of our distribution
facilities;
|
|
·
|
the
possible effect of pending legal actions and other
contingencies;
|
|
·
|
our
cash needs, including our ability to fund our future capital expenditures
and working capital requirements;
|
|
·
|
our
ability and plans to renew or increase our revolving credit
facilities;
|
|
·
|
our
seasonal sales patterns and assumptions concerning customer buying
behavior;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations regarding competition;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to renew or replace store leases
satisfactorily;
|
|
·
|
our
estimates and assumptions as they relate to preferable tax and financial
accounting methods, accruals, inventory valuations, dividends, carrying
amount and liquidity of financial instruments and fair value of options
and other stock-based compensation as well as our estimates of economic
and useful lives of depreciable assets and
leases;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations concerning future stock-based award
types;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations concerning employee option exercise
behavior;
|
|
·
|
the
possible effect of inflation, market decline and other economic changes on
our costs and profitability;
|
|
·
|
our
analyses of trends as related to earnings
performance;
|
|
·
|
our
target market presence and its expected impact on our sales
growth;
|
|
·
|
our
expectations concerning vendor level purchases and related
discounts;
|
|
·
|
our
estimates and assumptions related to income tax liabilities and uncertain
tax positions;
|
|
·
|
the
future reliability of, and cost associated with, our sources of supply,
particularly imported goods; and
|
|
·
|
the
possible effect of recent accounting
pronouncements.
|
You should assume that the information
appearing in this annual report is accurate only as of the date it was issued.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have
changed since that date.
For a discussion of the risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that could affect our future events, developments
or results, you should carefully review the “Risk Factors”
described beginning on page 9, as well as “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning
on page 19.
Our forward-looking statements could be
wrong in light of these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The
future events, developments or results described in this report could turn out
to be materially different. We have no obligation to publicly update or revise
our forward-looking statements after the date of this annual report and you
should not expect us to do so.
Investors should also be aware that
while we do, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts and others,
we do not, by policy, selectively disclose to them any material nonpublic
information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly,
stockholders should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued
by any analyst regardless of the content of the statement or report. We do not,
by policy, confirm forecasts or projections issued by others. Thus, to the
extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain any projections,
forecasts or opinions, such reports are not our responsibility.
Introductory
Note
Unless specifically indicated
otherwise, any reference to “2009” or “Fiscal 2009” relates to our year ending
January 31, 2009. Any reference to “2008” or “Fiscal 2008” relates to
our year ending February 2, 2008. Any reference to “2007” or “Fiscal 2007”
relates to our year ended February 3, 2007. Any reference to “2006” or “Fiscal
2006” relates to our year ended January 28, 2006.
Our
Company
Our Company was originally organized in
1945 under the name Dixie Supply Company in Florence, Alabama, in the marine and
small aircraft business. In 1951, the Company started targeting school athletic
programs in North Alabama and by the end of the 1950’s had developed a
profitable team sales business. In 1960, we sold the marine portion of our
business and have been solely in the athletic business since that time. In 1965,
we opened Dyess & Hibbett Sporting Goods in Huntsville, Alabama, and hired
Mickey Newsome, our current Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.
The next year, we opened another sporting goods store in Birmingham and by the
end of 1980, we had stores operating in 12 locations in central and northwest
Alabama with a distribution center located in Birmingham and our central
accounting office in Florence. We went public in October 1996 and were
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware as Hibbett Sporting Goods,
Inc. We incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware as
Hibbett Sports, Inc. in January 2007 and on February 10, 2007, Hibbett Sports,
Inc. became the successor holding company for Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc.,
which is now our operating subsidiary.
Today, we are a rapidly-growing
operator of sporting goods stores in small to mid-sized markets predominantly in
the Sunbelt, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest. As of February 2, 2008,
we operated 666 Hibbett Sports stores as well as 18 smaller-format Sports
Additions athletic shoe stores and 4 larger-format Sports & Co. superstores
in 23 states. Over the past two years, we have increased the number of stores
from 549 stores to 688 stores, an increase in store base of approximately 25%.
Our primary retail format and growth vehicle is Hibbett Sports, a 5,000 square
foot store located primarily in strip centers which are usually anchored by a
Wal-Mart store and in enclosed malls.
Although competitors in some markets
may carry similar product lines and national brands as our stores, we believe
that our stores are typically the primary sporting goods retailers in their
markets due to the extensive selection of quality branded merchandise and high
level of customer service. Hibbett’s merchandise assortment emphasizes team
sports complemented by localized apparel and accessories designed to appeal to a
wide range of customers within each individual market.
Available
Information
The Company maintains an Internet
website at the following address: www.hibbett.com.
We make available free of charge on or
through our website under the heading “Investor Information,” certain reports
that we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in
accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These include our annual
reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports
on Form 8-K. We make this information available on our website as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with or
furnish it to the SEC. In addition to accessing copies of our reports
online, you may request a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended February 2, 2008, at no charge, by writing to: Investor
Relations, Hibbett Sports, Inc., 451 Industrial Lane, Birmingham, Alabama
35211.
Reports filed with or furnished to the
SEC are also available free of charge upon request by contacting our corporate
office at (205) 942-4292.
The public may also read or copy any
materials filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100F
Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information may be obtained on the operation
of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also
maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically at www.sec.gov.
Our
Business Strategy
We target markets with county
populations that range from 30,000 to 100,000. By targeting these smaller
markets, we believe that we achieve important strategic advantages, including
many expansion opportunities, comparatively low operating costs and a more
limited competitive environment than generally faced in larger markets. In
addition, we establish greater customer and vendor recognition as the leading
sporting goods retailer in these local communities.
We believe our ability to merchandise
to local sporting and community interests differentiates us from our national
competitors. This strong regional focus also enables us to achieve significant
cost benefits including lower corporate expenses, reduced distribution costs and
increased economies of scale from marketing activities. Additionally, we also
use sophisticated information systems to maintain tight controls over inventory
and operating costs and continually search for ways to improve efficiencies
through information system upgrades, such as the JDA Merchandising System we
implemented beginning February 4, 2007.
We strive to hire enthusiastic sales
personnel with an interest in sports. Our extensive training program focuses on
product knowledge and selling skills and is conducted through the use of
in-store clinics, videos, self-study courses, interactive group discussions and
“Hibbett University” designed specifically for store management.
Our
Store Concepts
Hibbett
Sports
Our primary retail format is Hibbett
Sports, a 5,000 square foot store located primarily in strip centers which are
usually anchored by a Wal-Mart store and in enclosed malls. In considering
locations for our Hibbett Sports stores, we take into account the size,
demographics and competitive conditions of each market. Of these stores, 461
Hibbett Sports stores are located in strip centers with the remaining 205 stores
located in enclosed malls, the majority of which are the only enclosed malls in
the county.
Hibbett Sports stores offer a core
selection of quality, brand name merchandise with an emphasis on team sports.
This merchandise mix is complemented by a selection of localized apparel and
accessories designed to appeal to a wide range of customers within each market.
We strive to respond quickly to major sporting events of local interest. Such
events in Fiscal 2008 included the LSU Tiger’s victory in the Bowl Championship
Series (BCS) national championship game as well as the successful seasons of the
Dallas Cowboys and Jacksonville Jaguars and the enthusiasm surrounding Nick
Saban’s return to collegiate coaching at the University of Alabama.
Sports
Additions
Our 18 Sports Additions stores are
small, mall-based stores, averaging 2,500 square feet with approximately 90% of
merchandise consisting of athletic footwear and the remainder consisting of caps
and a limited assortment of apparel. Sports Additions stores offer a broader
assortment of athletic footwear, with a greater emphasis on fashion than the
athletic footwear assortment offered by our Hibbett Sports stores. All but 4 Sports Additions
stores are currently located in malls in which Hibbett Sports stores are also
present.
Sports
& Co.
We opened 4 Sports & Co.
superstores between March 1995 and September 1996. Sports & Co. superstores
average 25,000 square feet and offer a broader assortment of athletic footwear,
apparel and equipment than our Hibbett Sports stores. Athletic equipment and
apparel represent a higher percentage of the overall merchandise mix at Sports
& Co. superstores than they do at Hibbett Sports stores. Sports & Co.
superstores are designed to project the same in-store atmosphere as our Hibbett
Sports stores but on a larger scale. We have no plans to open any
superstores in the future.
Team
Sales
Hibbett Team Sales, Inc. (Team Sales),
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a leading supplier of customized
athletic apparel, equipment and footwear to school, athletic and youth programs
primarily in Alabama. Team Sales sells its merchandise directly to educational
institutions and youth associations. The operations of Team Sales are
independent of the operations of our retail stores. Team Sales does not meet the
quantitative or qualitative reporting requirements of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 131, “Disclosures About
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.”
Our
Expansion Strategy
In Fiscal 1994, we began to accelerate
our rate of new store openings to take advantage of the growth opportunities in
our target markets. We have currently identified over 350 potential markets for
future Hibbett Sports stores generally within the states in which we operate.
Our clustered expansion program, which calls for opening new stores within a
two-hour driving distance of an existing Hibbett location, allows us to take
advantage of efficiencies in distribution, marketing and regional management. We
believe our current distribution center can support over 1,000
stores.
In Fiscal 2009, we plan to open
approximately 85 new stores and close 10 stores while we will also remodel and
expand approximately 10 stores we feel have significant sales
potential. While we are opening more stores year over year, the
percentage increase will decline slightly from last year’s rate of
12%.
In evaluating potential markets, we
consider population, economic conditions, local competitive dynamics,
availability of suitable real estate and proximity to existing Hibbett Stores.
Our continued growth largely depends upon our ability to open new stores in a
timely manner, to operate them profitably and to manage them effectively.
Additionally, successful expansion is subject to various contingencies, many of
which are beyond our control. See “Risk
Factors.”
Our
Distribution
We maintain a single 220,000 square
foot distribution center in Birmingham, Alabama, which services our existing
stores. The distribution process is centrally managed from our corporate
headquarters, which is located in the same building as the distribution center.
We believe strong distribution support for our stores is a critical element of
our expansion strategy and is central to our ability to maintain a low cost
operating structure.
Previously, we discussed plans to open
a second distribution center in or around Dallas, Texas in Fiscal
2008. However, we have secured additional warehousing space in
Birmingham for new store accumulation and have made an additional investment in
our current distribution center that we believe will support our anticipated
growth over the next few years primarily in the states we currently
operate. Because of the additional warehousing space and investment
in our current distribution center coupled with improved technology and vendor
assistance with cross-docking, we believe we can service over 1,000 stores with
our current infrastructure in Birmingham.
We receive substantially all of our
merchandise at our distribution center. For key products, we maintain backstock
at the distribution center that is allocated and distributed to stores through
an automatic replenishment program based on items that are sold. Merchandise is
typically delivered to stores weekly via Company-operated vehicles.
Our
Merchandising Strategy
Our merchandising strategy
is to provide a broad assortment of quality brand name footwear, athletic
equipment, and apparel at competitive prices in a full service environment.
Historically, as well as for Fiscal 2008, our most popular consumer item is
athletic footwear, followed by performance and fashion apparel and team sports
equipment, ranked according to sales.
We believe that the breadth and depth
of our brand name merchandise selection generally exceeds the merchandise
selection carried by local independent competitors. Many of these branded
products are highly technical and require considerable sales assistance. We
coordinate with our vendors to educate the sales staff at the store level on new
products and trends.
Although the core merchandise
assortment tends to be similar for each Hibbett Sports store, important local or
regional differences frequently exist. Accordingly, our stores regularly offer
products that reflect preferences for particular sporting activities in each
community and local interests in college and professional sports teams. Our
knowledge of these interests, combined with access to leading vendors, enables
our stores to react quickly to emerging trends or special events, such as
college or professional championships.
Our merchandising staff, operations
staff and management analyze current sporting goods trends primarily through the
gathering and analyzing of detail daily sales activity available through
point-of-sale terminals located in the stores. We also visit Hibbett and
competitor store locations, maintain close relationships with vendors and other
retailers, monitor product selection at competing stores, communicate with
district and store managers and review industry trade publications in an effort
to recognize trends. The merchandising staff works closely with store personnel
to meet the requirements of individual stores for appropriate merchandise in
sufficient quantities.
Our success depends in part on our
ability to anticipate and respond to changing merchandise trends and consumer
demand on a store level in a timely manner. See “Risk
Factors.”
Our
Vendor Relationships
The sporting goods retail business is
very brand name driven. Accordingly, we maintain relationships with a number of
well known sporting goods vendors to satisfy customer demand. We believe that
our stores are among the primary retail distribution avenues for brand name
vendors that seek to penetrate our target markets. As a result, we are able to
attract considerable vendor interest and establish long-term partnerships with
vendors. As our vendors expand their product lines and grow in popularity, we
expand sales and promotions of these products within our stores. In addition, as
we continue to increase our store base and enter new markets, our vendors
increase their brand presence within these regions. We also emphasize and work
with our vendors to establish favorable pricing and to receive cooperative
marketing funds. We believe that we maintain good working relationships with our
vendors. For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008, Nike, our
largest vendor, represented approximately 48.5% of our total purchases while our
next largest vendor represented approximately 9.3% of our total
purchases. For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007, Nike, our
largest vendor, represented approximately 47.3% of our total purchases while our
next largest vendor represented approximately 9.4% of our total
purchases.
The loss of key vendor support could be
detrimental to our business, financial condition and results of operations. We
believe that we have long-standing and strong relationships with our vendors and
that we have adequate sources of brand name merchandise on competitive terms;
however, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to acquire such merchandise at
competitive prices or on competitive terms in the future. In this regard,
certain merchandise that is high profile and in high demand may be allocated by
vendors based upon the vendors’ internal criterion, which is beyond our control.
See “Risk
Factors.”
Our
Advertising and Promotion
We target special advertising
opportunities in our markets to increase the effectiveness of our advertising
budget. In particular, we prefer advertising in local media as a way to further
differentiate Hibbett from national chain competitors. Substantially all of our
advertising and promotional spending is centrally directed. Print advertising,
including direct mail catalogs and postcards to customers, serves as the
foundation of our promotional program and accounted for the majority of our
total advertising costs in Fiscal 2008. Other advertising means, such as
television commercials, outdoor billboards, Hibbett trucks, our MVP loyalty
program and the Hibbett website, are used to reinforce Hibbett’s name
recognition and brand awareness in the community.
Our
Competition
The business in which we are engaged is
highly competitive. Many of the items we offer in our stores are also sold by
local sporting goods stores, athletic footwear and other specialty athletic
stores, traditional shoe stores and national and regional sporting goods stores.
The marketplace for sporting goods remains highly fragmented as many different
retailers compete for market share by utilizing a variety of store formats and
merchandising strategies. In recent years, there has been significant
consolidation of large format retailers in large metropolitan markets. However,
we believe the competitive environment for sporting goods remains different in
smaller markets where retail demand may not support larger format stores. In
such markets as those targeted by Hibbett, national chains compete by focusing
on a specialty category like athletic footwear.
Our stores compete with national
chains that focus on athletic footwear, local sporting goods stores, department
and discount stores, traditional shoe stores and mass merchandisers. On a
limited basis, we are also seeing competition from national sporting goods
chains in some of our mid-sized markets. Although we face
competition from a variety of competitors, including on-line competitors, we
believe that our stores are able to compete effectively by being
distinguished as sporting goods stores emphasizing team sports and fitness
merchandise complemented by a selection of localized apparel and accessories.
Our competitors may carry similar product lines and national brands, but we
believe the principal competitive factors for all of our stores are service,
breadth of merchandise offered, availability of brand names and availability of
local merchandise. We believe we compete favorably with respect to these factors
in the smaller markets predominantly in the Sunbelt, Mid-Atlantic and the lower
Midwest. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to continue to
compete successfully against existing or future competitors. Expansion into
markets served by our competitors, entry of new competitors or expansion of
existing competitors into our markets, could be detrimental to our business,
financial condition and results of operations. See “Risk
Factors.”
Our
Trademarks
Our Company, by and through
subsidiaries, is the owner or licensee of trademarks that are very important to
our business. For the most part, trademarks are valid as long as they are in use
and/or their registrations are properly maintained. Registrations of trademarks
can generally be renewed indefinitely as long as the trademarks are in
use.
Following
is a list of active trademarks registered and owned by the Company:
|
·
|
Hibbett
Sports, Registration No. 2717584
|
|
·
|
Sports
Additions, Registration No. 1767761
|
|
·
|
Hibbett,
Registration No. 78923441
|
Our
Employees
As of February 2, 2008, we employed
approximately 1,900 full-time and approximately 3,500 part-time employees, none
of whom are represented by a labor union. The number of part-time employees
fluctuates depending on seasonal needs. We cannot guarantee that our employees
will not, in the future, elect to be represented by a union. We consider our
relationship with our employees to be good and have not experienced significant
interruptions of operations due to labor disagreements.
Employee Development. We
develop our training programs in a continuing effort to service the needs of our
customers and employees. These programs are designed to increase employee
knowledge and include video training in all stores for the latest in technical
detail of new products and new operational and service techniques. Because we
primarily promote or relocate current employees to serve as managers for new
stores, training and assessment of our employees is essential to our sustained
growth.
We have implemented programs in our
stores and corporate offices to ensure that we hire and promote the most
qualified employees in a non-discriminatory way. One of the most significant
programs we have is Hibbett University or “Hibbett U” which is an intensive,
four day training session held at our corporate offices and designed
specifically for store management.
You
should carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information
contained in this report, before investing in shares of our common stock. If any
of the following risks actually occur, our business could be harmed. In that
case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you might lose
all or part of your investment.
We
may be unable to achieve our expansion plans for future growth.
We have grown rapidly primarily through
opening new stores, growing from 67 stores at the beginning of fiscal year 1997
to 688 stores at February 2, 2008. We plan to increase our store base by opening 85 new Hibbett
Sports stores while closing 10 stores in Fiscal 2009. Our continued growth
depends, in large part, upon our ability to open new stores in a timely manner
and to operate them profitably. Additionally, successful expansion is subject to
various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In order to open
and operate new stores successfully, we must:
|
·
|
identify
and secure suitable store sites on a timely
basis;
|
|
·
|
negotiate
acceptable lease terms, including desired tenant improvement
allowances;
|
|
·
|
complete
any necessary construction or refurbishment of these sites as well as
furnish and equip the new stores
timely;
|
|
·
|
hire,
train and retain competent store
personnel;
|
|
·
|
identify
and source sufficient inventories to meet the needs of the new stores and
the preferences of the consumers in that market;
and
|
|
·
|
successfully
integrate new stores into our existing
operations.
|
In addition, our expansion strategy may
be subject to rising real estate and construction costs that could inhibit our
ability to sustain our rate of growth. We may also face new
competitive, distribution and merchandising challenges different from those we
currently face. We cannot give any assurances that we will be able to
continue our expansion plans successfully; that we will be able to achieve
results similar to those achieved with prior locations; or that we will be able
to continue to manage our growth effectively. Our failure to achieve our
expansion plans could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, our operating margins may be
impacted in periods in which incremental expenses are incurred as a result of
new store openings.
Our
stores are concentrated within the Sunbelt, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest
portions of the United States, which could subject us to regional
risks.
Because our stores are located
primarily in a concentrated area of the United States, we are subject to
regional risks, such as the regional economy, weather conditions and natural
disasters such as floods, droughts, tornadoes and hurricanes, increasing costs
of electricity, oil and natural gas as well as government regulations specific
in the states and localities within which we operate. We sell a
significant amount of team sports merchandise which can be adversely affected by
significant weather events that postpone the start of or shorten sports seasons
or that limit participation of fans and sports enthusiasts.
A
downturn in the economy could affect consumer purchases of discretionary items,
which could reduce our sales.
In general, our sales represent
discretionary spending by our customers. Discretionary spending is affected by
many factors, including:
|
·
|
interest
rates and inflation;
|
|
·
|
the
impact of an economic recession;
|
|
·
|
the
impact of natural disasters;
|
|
·
|
the
availability of consumer credit;
|
|
·
|
consumer
debt levels and reduced levels of consumer disposable
income;
|
|
·
|
changes
in tax rates and tax policies;
|
|
·
|
unemployment
trends; and
|
|
·
|
consumer
confidence in future economic
conditions.
|
Increasing volatility in financial
markets could cause a greater frequency or higher magnitude of change in many of
the factors listed. Our customers’ purchases of discretionary items,
including products that we sell, could decline during periods when disposable
income is lower or periods of actual or perceived unfavorable economic
conditions. If this occurs, our revenues and profitability could
decline. In addition, our sales could be adversely affected by a downturn in the
economic conditions in the markets in which we operate.
We
may be subject to periodic litigation, including the Fair Labor Standards Act
lawsuits, which may adversely affect the Company’s business and financial
performance.
From time to time, we are involved in
lawsuits, including class action lawsuits brought against us for alleged
violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Due to the inherent
uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome
of any such proceedings. We may incur losses relating to these claims
and, in addition, these proceedings could cause us to incur costs and may
require us to devote resources to defend against these claims which could
adversely affect our results of operations. For a description of
current legal proceedings, see Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings.
Our
inability to identify, and anticipate changes in consumer demands and
preferences and our inability to respond to such consumer demands in a timely
manner could reduce our sales.
Our products appeal to a broad range of
consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and are subject
to rapid change. Our success depends on our ability to identify product trends
as well as to anticipate and respond to changing merchandise trends and consumer
demand in a timely manner. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue
to offer assortments of products that appeal to our customers or that we will
satisfy changing consumer demands in the future. Accordingly, our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected if:
|
·
|
we
are unable to identify and respond to emerging trends, including shifts in
the popularity of certain products;
|
|
·
|
we
miscalculate either the market for the merchandise in our stores or our
customers’ purchasing habits; or
|
|
·
|
consumer
demand unexpectedly shifts away from athletic footwear or our more
profitable apparel lines.
|
In addition, we may be faced with
significant excess inventory of some products and missed opportunities for other
products, which could decrease our profitability.
If
we lose any of our key vendors or any of our key vendors fail to supply us with
merchandise, we may not be able to meet the demand of our customers and our
sales could decline.
Our business is dependent to a
significant degree upon close relationships with vendors and our ability to
purchase brand name merchandise at competitive prices. In addition, many of our
vendors provide us with incentives, such as return privileges, volume purchasing
allowances and cooperative advertising. The loss of key vendor
support or decline or discontinuation of vendor incentives could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to acquire such merchandise at
competitive prices or on competitive terms in the future. In this regard,
certain merchandise that is in high demand may be allocated by vendors based
upon the vendors’ internal criterion which is beyond our control.
In addition, we believe many of our
largest vendors source a substantial majority of their products from China and
other foreign countries. Imported goods are generally less expensive than
domestic goods and indirectly contribute significantly to our favorable profit
margins. A disruption in the flow of imported merchandise or an increase in the
cost of those goods may significantly decrease our sales and
profits.
We may experience a disruption or
increase in the cost of imported vendor products at any time for reasons that
may not be in our control. If imported merchandise becomes more expensive or
unavailable, the transition to alternative sources by our vendors may not occur
in time to meet our demands or the demands of our customers. Products from
alternative sources may also be more expensive than those our vendors currently
import. Risks associated with reliance on imported goods include:
|
·
|
disruptions
in the flow of imported goods because of factors such
as:
|
|
·
|
raw
material shortages, work stoppages, strikes and political
unrest;
|
|
·
|
problems
with oceanic shipping;
|
|
·
|
economic
crises and international disputes;
and
|
|
·
|
increases
in the cost of purchasing or shipping foreign merchandise resulting
from:
|
|
·
|
foreign
government regulations;
|
|
·
|
changes
in currency exchange rates and local economic conditions;
and
|
|
·
|
trade
restrictions, including import duties, import quotas or loss of “most
favored nation” status with the United
States.
|
In addition, to the extent that any
foreign manufacturer from whom our vendors are associated may directly or
indirectly utilize labor practices that are not commonly accepted in the United
States, we could be affected by any resulting negative publicity. Our sales and
profitability could decline if vendors are unable to promptly replace sources
providing equally appealing products at a similar cost.
Problems
with our information system software could disrupt our operations and negatively
impact our financial results and materially adversely affect our business
operations.
The efficient operation of our business
is dependent on the successful integration and operation of our information
systems. In particular, we rely on our information systems to manage effectively
our sales, distribution, merchandise planning and replenishment, to process
financial information and sales transactions and to optimize our overall
inventory levels. Most of our information systems are centrally located at our
headquarters, with offsite backup at other locations. Our systems, if
not functioning properly, could disrupt our ability to track, record and analyze
sales and inventory movement and could cause disruptions of operations,
including, among other things, our ability to process and ship inventory,
process financial information including credit card transactions, process
payrolls or vendor payments or engage in other similar normal business
activities. Any material disruption, malfunction or other similar
problems in or with our information systems could negatively impact our
financial results and materially adversely affect our business
operations.
Pressure
from our competitors may force us to reduce our prices or increase our spending,
which would lower our revenue and profitability.
The business in which we are engaged is
highly competitive. The marketplace for sporting goods remains highly fragmented
as many different retailers compete for market share by utilizing a variety of
store formats and merchandising strategies. We compete with national chains that
focus on athletic footwear, local sporting goods stores, department and discount
stores, traditional shoe stores and mass merchandisers and, on a limited basis,
national sporting goods stores. Many of our competitors have greater financial
resources than we do. In addition, many of our competitors employ price
discounting policies that, if intensified, may make it difficult for us to reach
our sales goals without reducing our prices. As a result of this competition, we
may also need to spend more on advertising and promotion than we anticipate. We
cannot guarantee that we will continue to be able to compete successfully
against existing or future competitors. Expansion into markets served by our
competitors, entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into
our markets could be detrimental to our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Our
operating results are subject to seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, which
could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
We have historically experienced and
expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales,
operating income and net income. Our net sales, operating income and net income
are typically higher in the spring, back-to-school and Christmas holiday
seasons. An economic downturn during these periods could adversely affect us to
a greater extent than if a downturn occurred at other times of the
year.
Our highest sales and operating income
historically occur during the fourth fiscal quarter, due mostly to the holiday
selling season. Any decrease in our fourth quarter sales, whether
because of a slow holiday selling season, unseasonable weather conditions,
slowing economic conditions, or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and operating results for the entire fiscal
year.
Our
quarterly operating results, including comparable store sales, will fluctuate
and may not be a meaningful indicator of future performance and such
fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common
stock.
Our net sales and quarterly results of
operations have fluctuated in the past and vary from quarter to
quarter. A number of factors, many outside our control, can cause
variations in our quarterly results, including:
|
·
|
changes
in product demand that we offer in our
stores;
|
|
·
|
retirement
or demise of sports superstars key to certain product
promotion;
|
|
·
|
strikes
or lockouts involving professional sports
teams;
|
|
·
|
costs
related to the closures of existing
stores;
|
|
·
|
changes
in our merchandise assortment;
|
|
·
|
population
trends and changes in the business
environment.
|
Changes in our comparable store sales
results could affect the price of our common stock. Factors which
have historically affected, and will continue to affect our comparable store
sales results, include:
|
·
|
shifts
in consumer tastes and fashion
trends;
|
|
·
|
calendar
shifts of holiday or seasonal
periods;
|
|
·
|
the
timing of new store openings and the relative proportion of new stores to
mature stores;
|
|
·
|
the
level of pre-operating expenses associated with new
stores;
|
|
·
|
the
amount and timing of net sales contributed by new
stores;
|
|
·
|
changes
in the other tenants in the shopping centers in which we are
located;
|
|
·
|
pricing,
promotion or other actions taken by our competitors or the addition
of new competitors within our
markets;
|
|
·
|
the
timing and type of promotional events;
and
|
|
·
|
unseasonable
weather conditions or natural
disasters.
|
We cannot assure you that comparable
store sales will trend at the rates achieved in prior periods or that rates will
not decline. Comparable store sales vary from quarter to quarter, and
an unanticipated decline in revenues or comparable store sales may cause the
price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.
The market price of our common stock is
likely to be highly volatile as the stock market in general is and has been
highly volatile. Factors that could cause fluctuation in our common
stock price may include, among other things:
|
·
|
actual
or anticipated variations in quarterly operating
results;
|
|
·
|
changes
in financial estimates by security
analysts;
|
|
·
|
our
inability to meet or exceed securities analysts’ estimates or
expectations;
|
|
·
|
market
reaction to conditions or trends within our industry or to changes in the
market valuations of other retail
companies;
|
|
·
|
additions
or departures of key personnel;
|
|
·
|
market
rumors or announcements by us or by our competitors of significant
acquisitions, divestitures or joint ventures, strategic partnerships or
other strategic initiatives;
|
|
·
|
announcements
by us of large capital commitments;
and
|
|
·
|
sales
of our common stock by key personnel or large institutional
holders.
|
Many of these factors are beyond our
control and may cause the market price of our common stock to decline,
regardless of our operating performance.
We
would be materially and adversely affected if our single distribution center
were shut down.
We currently operate a single
centralized distribution center in Birmingham, Alabama. We receive and ship
substantially all of our merchandise at our distribution center. Any natural
disaster or other serious disruption to this facility due to fire, tornado or
any other cause would damage a portion of our inventory and could impair our
ability to adequately stock our stores and process returns of products to
vendors and could adversely affect our sales and profitability. In addition, we
could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with
distributing our products to our stores during the time it takes for us to
reopen or replace the center.
We
depend on key personnel.
We have benefited from the leadership
and performance of our senior management, especially Michael J. Newsome, our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. If we lose the services of any
of our principal executive officers, including Mr. Newsome we may not be able to
run our business effectively and operating results could suffer. In
particular, Mr. Newsome has been instrumental in directing our business
strategy within our target markets in the Sunbelt, Mid-Atlantic and the lower
Midwest and maintaining long-term relationships with our key vendors. Our
overall success and the success of our expansion strategy will depend on our
ability to retain our current management, including Mr. Newsome, and our
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. As we continue
to grow, we will continue to hire, appoint or otherwise change senior managers
and other key executives. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of
our executive officers. The loss of services of Mr. Newsome for any reason
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, the loss of certain other principal
executive officers could affect our ability to run our business effectively and
our ability to successfully expand our operations.
On March 9, 2005, we entered into a
Retention Agreement (the Agreement) with Mr. Newsome. The purpose of the
Agreement is to secure the continued employment of Mr. Newsome as an
advisor to us following his future retirement from the duties of Chief Executive
Officer of our Company. Such retirement is not currently planned.
Provisions
in our charter documents and Delaware law might deter acquisition bids for
us.
Certain provisions of our certificate
of incorporation and bylaws may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects and may
discourage, delay or prevent a takeover attempt that a stockholder might
consider in its best interest. These provisions, among other
things:
|
·
|
classify
our Board of Directors into three classes, each of which serves for
different three year periods;
|
|
·
|
provide
that a director may be removed by stockholders only for cause by a vote of
the holders of not less than two-thirds of our shares entitled to
vote;
|
|
·
|
provide
that all vacancies on our Board of Directors, including any vacancies
resulting from an increase in the number of directors, may be filled by a
majority of the remaining directors, even if the number is less than a
quorum;
|
|
·
|
provide
that special meetings of the stockholders may only be called by the
Chairman of the Board of Directors, a majority of the Board of Directors
or upon the demand of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to
vote at any such special meeting;
and
|
|
·
|
call
for a vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the shares
entitled to vote in order to amend the foregoing provisions and certain
other provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws.
|
In addition, our Board of Directors,
without further action of the stockholders, is permitted to issue and fix the
terms of preferred stock which may have rights senior to those of common stock.
We are also subject to the Delaware business combination statute, which may
render a change in control of us more difficult. Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Laws would be expected to have an anti-takeover effect with
respect to transactions not approved in advance by the Board of Directors,
including discouraging takeover attempts that might result in a premium over the
market price for the shares of Common Stock held by stockholders.
None.
We currently lease all of our existing
688 store locations and expect that our policy of leasing rather than owning
will continue as we continue to expand. Our leases typically provide for terms
of five to ten years with options on our part to extend. Most leases also
contain a kick-out clause if projected sales levels are not met and an early
termination/remedy option if co-tenancy and exclusivity provisions are violated.
We believe this leasing strategy enhances our flexibility to pursue various
expansion opportunities resulting from changing market conditions and to
periodically re-evaluate store locations. Our ability to open new stores is
contingent upon locating satisfactory sites, negotiating favorable leases,
recruiting and training qualified management personnel and the availability of
market relevant inventory.
As current leases expire, we believe we
will either be able to obtain lease renewals for present store locations or to
obtain leases for equivalent or better locations in the same general area. For
the most part, we have not experienced any significant difficulty in either
renewing leases for existing locations or securing leases for suitable locations
for new stores. Based primarily on our belief that we maintain good relations
with our landlords, that most of our leases are at approximate market rents and
that generally we have been able to secure leases for suitable locations, we
believe our lease strategy will not be detrimental to our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Our corporate offices and our retail
distribution center are leased under an operating lease. We own the Team Sales’
facility located in Birmingham, Alabama that warehouses inventory for
educational institutions and youth associations. We believe our current
distribution center is suitable and adequate to support our immediate needs in
the next few years.
Store
Locations
As of February 2, 2008, we currently
operate 688 stores in 23 contiguous states. Of these stores, 224 are located in
malls and 464 are located in strip-shopping centers which are typically anchored
by a Wal-Mart store. The following shows the number of locations by state as of March 28,
2008:
Alabama
|
79
|
|
Kansas
|
15
|
|
Ohio
|
14
|
Arizona
|
5
|
|
Kentucky
|
33
|
|
Oklahoma
|
27
|
Arkansas
|
34
|
|
Louisiana
|
33
|
|
South
Carolina
|
31
|
Florida
|
32
|
|
Missouri
|
21
|
|
Tennessee
|
50
|
Georgia
|
84
|
|
Mississippi
|
52
|
|
Texas
|
67
|
Iowa
|
5
|
|
Nebraska
|
4
|
|
Virginia
|
16
|
Illinois
|
16
|
|
New
Mexico
|
7
|
|
West
Virginia
|
4
|
Indiana
|
18
|
|
North
Carolina
|
44
|
|
TOTAL
|
691
|
In October 2005, three former employees
filed a lawsuit in Mississippi federal court alleging they are owed back wages
for overtime because they were improperly classified as exempt salaried
employees. They also alleged other wage and hour
violations. The suit asked the court to certify the case as a
collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of all similarly
situated employees. We dispute the allegations of wrongdoing in this
complaint and have vigorously defended ourselves in this
matter. However, the parties have negotiated a settlement and the
court has now ruled to certify the collective action in accordance with the
negotiated settlement. At February 2, 2008, we began making initial
distributions and estimated that the remaining liability related to this matter
is $755,000. Accordingly, we accrued $755,000 as a current liability
on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. At February 3, 2007, we
had accrued $750,000 as a current liability on our condensed consolidated
balance sheet relating to this matter. Subsequent to the end of
Fiscal 2008, we completed our obligation under the negotiated settlement related
to this case.
We are also party to other legal
proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that any of
these matters will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse
effect on our business or financial condition. We cannot give
assurance, however, that one or more of these lawsuits will not have a material
adverse affect on our results of operations for the period in which they are
resolved.
The estimate of our liability for
pending and unasserted potential claims does not include litigation
costs. It is our policy to accrue legal fees when it is probable that
we will have to defend against known claims or allegations and we can reasonably
estimate the amount of the anticipated expense. Although we have
accrued legal fees associated with litigation currently pending against us, we
have not made any accruals for potential liability for settlements or judgments
because the potential liability is neither probable nor estimable.
From time to time, we enter into
certain types of agreements that require us to indemnify parties against third
party claims under certain circumstances. Generally, these agreements
relate to: (a) agreements with vendors and suppliers under which we may provide
customary indemnification to our vendors and suppliers in respect to actions
they take at our request or otherwise on our behalf; (b) agreements to indemnify
vendors against trademark and copyright infringement claims concerning
merchandise manufactured specifically for or on behalf of the Company; (c) real
estate leases, under which we may agree to indemnify the lessors from claims
arising from our use of the property; and (d) agreements with our directors,
officers and employees, under which we may agree to indemnify such persons for
liabilities arising out of their relationship with us. We have
director and officer liability insurance, which, subject to the policy’s
conditions, provides coverage for indemnification amounts payable by us with
respect to our directors and officers up to specified limits and subject to
certain deductibles.
If the Company believes that a loss is
both probable and estimable for a particular matter, the loss is accrued in
accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for
Contingencies.” With respect to any matter, the Company could
change its belief as to whether a loss is probable or estimable, or its estimate
of loss, at any time. Even though the Company may not believe a loss
is probable or estimable, it is reasonably possible that the Company could
suffer a loss with respect to that matter in the future.
No matters were submitted to a vote of
our stockholders during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008.
Our common stock is traded on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market (NASDAQ) under the symbol HIBB. The following table
sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of shares
of our Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ.
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Fiscal
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter ended May 5, 2007
|
|
$ |
32.97 |
|
|
$ |
27.26 |
|
Second
Quarter ended August 4, 2007
|
|
$ |
30.62 |
|
|
$ |
23.70 |
|
Third
Quarter ended November 3, 2007
|
|
$ |
28.74 |
|
|
$ |
21.09 |
|
Fourth
Quarter ended February 2, 2008
|
|
$ |
23.65 |
|
|
$ |
12.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
Quarter ended April 29, 2006
|
|
$ |
34.54 |
|
|
$ |
28.20 |
|
Second
Quarter ended July 29, 2006
|
|
$ |
31.19 |
|
|
$ |
18.95 |
|
Third
Quarter ended October 28, 2006
|
|
$ |
28.16 |
|
|
$ |
18.90 |
|
Fourth
Quarter ended February 3, 2007
|
|
$ |
33.95 |
|
|
$ |
27.00 |
|
On March 28, 2008, the last reported
sale price for our common stock as quoted by NASDAQ was $15.06 per
share. As of March 28, 2008, we had 23 stockholders of
record.
The Stock Price Performance Graph below
compares the percentage change in our cumulative total stockholder return on its
common stock against a cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index and
the NASDAQ Retail Trade Index. The graph below outlines returns for
the period beginning on January 31, 2003 to January 31, 2008. We have
not paid any dividends. Total stockholder return for prior periods is
not necessarily an indication of future performance.
We have never declared or paid any
dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings
to finance the growth and development of our business and for our stock
repurchase program, and therefore do not anticipate declaring or paying cash
dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future decision to
declare or pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and
will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems
relevant.
The following table presents our share
repurchase activity for the thirteen weeks and quarter ending February 2,
2008:
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES (1)
Period
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average
Price per Share
|
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced
Programs
|
|
|
Approximate
Dollar Value of Shares that may yet be Purchased Under the
Programs
|
|
As
of November 3, 2007
|
|
|
5,276,713 |
|
|
$ |
23.45 |
|
|
|
5,276,713 |
|
|
$ |
126,239,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
4, 2007 to December 1, 2007
|
|
|
302,600 |
|
|
|
21.44 |
|
|
|
302,600 |
|
|
|
119,752,000 |
|
December
2, 2007 to January 5, 2008
|
|
|
432,400 |
|
|
|
20.45 |
|
|
|
432,400 |
|
|
|
110,908,000 |
|
January
6, 2008 to February 2, 2008
|
|
|
711,400 |
|
|
|
15.34 |
|
|
|
711,400 |
|
|
|
99,996,000 |
|
Quarter
ended February 2, 2008
|
|
|
1,446,400 |
|
|
|
18.14 |
|
|
|
1,446,400 |
|
|
|
99,996,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
since inception
|
|
|
6,723,113 |
|
|
$ |
22.31 |
|
|
|
6,723,113 |
|
|
$ |
99,996,000 |
|
(1)
|
In
August 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a plan to repurchase our
common stock. The Board of Directors has subsequently authorized increases
to this plan with a current authorization effective November 2007 of
$250.0 million. The current authorization expires on January
30, 2010. Considering stock repurchases through February 2,
2008, we have approximately $100.0 million of the total authorization
remaining for future stock
repurchases.
|
The following selected consolidated
financial data has been derived from the consolidated financial statements of
the Company. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Financial
Statements thereto.
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except share and per share amounts and Selected Operating
Data)
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
February
2,
|
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
January
29,
|
|
|
January
31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(52
weeks)
|
|
|
(53
weeks)
|
|
|
(52
weeks)
|
|
|
(52
weeks)
|
|
|
(52
weeks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
$ |
520,720 |
|
|
$ |
512,094 |
|
|
$ |
440,269 |
|
|
$ |
377,534 |
|
|
$ |
320,964 |
|
Cost
of goods sold, including distribution center and store occupancy
costs
|
|
351,876 |
|
|
|
338,963 |
|
|
|
293,368 |
|
|
|
255,250 |
|
|
|
216,938 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
168,844 |
|
|
|
173,131 |
|
|
|
146,901 |
|
|
|
122,284 |
|
|
|
104,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store
operating, selling and administrative expenses
|
|
108,463 |
|
|
|
100,461 |
|
|
|
85,060 |
|
|
|
72,923 |
|
|
|
63,514 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
12,154 |
|
|
|
10,932 |
|
|
|
10,119 |
|
|
|
9,939 |
|
|
|
9,686 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
48,227 |
|
|
|
61,738 |
|
|
|
51,722 |
|
|
|
39,422 |
|
|
|
30,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Interest
income, net
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
|
48,658 |
|
|
|
62,614 |
|
|
|
52,868 |
|
|
|
39,897 |
|
|
|
30,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
18,329 |
|
|
|
24,541 |
|
|
|
19,244 |
|
|
|
14,750 |
|
|
|
11,290 |
|
Net
income
|
$ |
30,329 |
|
|
$ |
38,073 |
|
|
$ |
33,624 |
|
|
$ |
25,147 |
|
|
$ |
19,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
Diluted
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
31,049,058 |
|
|
|
32,094,127 |
|
|
|
33,605,568 |
|
|
|
34,855,682 |
|
|
|
34,521,674 |
|
Diluted
|
|
31,525,050 |
|
|
|
32,619,839 |
|
|
|
34,393,026 |
|
|
|
35,690,363 |
|
|
|
35,397,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
$ |
89,383 |
|
|
$ |
106,428 |
|
|
$ |
98,623 |
|
|
$ |
106,012 |
|
|
$ |
96,042 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
216,734 |
|
|
|
212,853 |
|
|
|
195,829 |
|
|
|
202,105 |
|
|
|
173,759 |
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Stockholders'
investment
|
|
119,055 |
|
|
|
136,641 |
|
|
|
124,773 |
|
|
|
130,039 |
|
|
|
120,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Operating
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of stores open at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hibbett
Sports
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Sports
& Co.
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Sports
Additions
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Total
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
Note: No
dividends have been declared or paid.
Overview
Hibbett Sports, Inc. operates sporting
goods stores in small to mid-sized markets, predominantly in the Sunbelt,
Mid-Atlantic and the lower Midwest. Our stores offer a broad assortment of
quality athletic equipment, footwear and apparel with a high level of customer
service. As of February 2, 2008 we operated a total of 688 retail stores
composed of 666 Hibbett Sports stores, 18 Sports Additions athletic shoe stores
and 4 Sports & Co. superstores in 23 states.
Our primary retail format and growth
vehicle is Hibbett Sports, a 5,000-square-foot store located primarily in strip
centers which are usually anchored by a Wal-Mart store and in enclosed malls.
Over the last several years, we have concentrated and expect to continue our
store base growth in strip centers versus enclosed malls. We believe
Hibbett Sports stores are typically the primary sporting goods retailers in
their markets due to the extensive selection of quality branded merchandise and
a high level of customer service. We do not expect that the average size of our
stores opening in Fiscal 2009 will vary significantly from the average size of
stores opened in Fiscal 2008.
We historically have comparable store
sales in the low to mid-single digit range. We plan to increase total
company-wide square footage by approximately 11% in Fiscal 2009, which is
slightly below our increases over the last several years of between 12% and 15%.
We believe total sales percentage growth will be mid to high single digits in
Fiscal 2009. Over the past several years,
we have increased our product margin due to improved vendor discounts, fewer
retail reductions, increased efficiencies in logistics and favorable leveraging
of store occupancy costs. We expect a slight improvement in product margin rate
in Fiscal 2009 attributable primarily to improved vendor discounts.
Due to our increased sales, we have
historically leveraged our store operating, selling and administrative expenses.
Based on projected sales, we expect operating, selling and administrative rates
to increase somewhat in Fiscal 2009 primarily due to lower than normal
historical sales growth and increases in statutory minimum wage. We also expect
to continue to generate sufficient cash to enable us to expand and remodel our
store base and to provide capital expenditures for both distribution center and
technology upgrade projects.
Hibbett maintains a merchandise
management system that allows us to identify and monitor
trends. However, this system does not produce U.S. generally accepted
accounting principle (GAAP) financial information by product
category. Therefore, it is impracticable to provide GAAP net sales by
product category.
Our audited consolidated financial
statements presented in this Form 10-K differ from our earnings release reported
on March 13, 2008 due to a refinement of our estimate of the lower of cost or
market reserve. The revised estimate resulted in a decrease of $0.8
million in ending inventory and pre-tax income from previously reported
numbers.
Hibbett operates on a 52- or 53-week
fiscal year ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31 of each year. The
consolidated statement of operations for fiscal year ended February 2, 2008
includes 52 weeks of operations. The consolidated statements of
operations for fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 includes 53 weeks of
operations and the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal year ended
January 28, 2006 includes 52 weeks of operations. We have operated as
a public company and have been incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware since October 6, 1996.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of certain
items included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed for the
periods indicated.
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
February
2,
|
|
February
3,
|
|
January
28,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Net
sales
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Costs
of goods sold, including distribution and store occupancy
costs
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
|
66.2 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store
operating, selling and administrative expenses
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest
income, net
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Net
income
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
Note: Columns
may not foot due to rounding.
Fiscal
2008 Compared to Fiscal 2007
Net sales. Net sales
increased $8.6 million, or 1.7%, to $520.7 million for the 52 weeks ended
February 2, 2008, from $512.1 million for the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007.
We attribute this slight increase to the following factors:
|
·
|
We
opened 82 Hibbett Sports and 2 Sports Additions stores while closing 9
Hibbett Sports stores for net stores opened of 75 stores in the 52 weeks
ended February 2, 2008. New stores and stores not in the comparable store
net sales calculation accounted for $22.6 million of the increase in net
sales.
|
|
·
|
We
experienced a 3.1% decrease in comparable store net sales for the 52 weeks
ended February 2, 2008 compared to the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2007
primarily as the result of a decrease in store traffic resulting from a
difficult economic environment in our
industry.
|
|
·
|
Net
sales increased 4.1% for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008 compared to
the 52 weeks ended January 27,
2007.
|
|
·
|
Net
sales from the 53rd
week of Fiscal 2007 accounted for approximately $11.8 million or
approximately 2.4%.
|
We believe the decrease in comparable
store sales is attributable to overall economic pressures on our consumers
resulting from the housing slump, rising fuel prices and anxiety over the
economy in general. Additionally, our results were impacted by a
weakening in our urban markets as we believe those fashion dollars historically
used for high-priced athletic shoes and fashion items shifted to high-priced
electronics. We experienced the following trends in Fiscal
2008:
|
·
|
We
experienced an overall decline in footwear and equipment
sales.
|
|
·
|
Pro-licensed
apparel continued its slow down, especially in NBA licensed
product.
|
|
·
|
We
saw a negative shift in our urban fashion apparel and
footwear.
|
Comparable store net sales data for the
period reflects sales for our traditional format Hibbett Sports and Sports
Additions stores open throughout the period and the corresponding period of the
prior fiscal year. If a store remodel or relocation results in the
store being closed for a significant period of time, its sales are removed from
the comparable store base until it has been open a full 12
months. During the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, 524 stores were
included in the comparable store sales comparison. Our four Sports
& Co. stores are not and have never been included in the comparable store
net sales comparison because we have not opened a superstore since September
1996 nor do we plan to open additional superstores in the
future.
Gross profit. Cost of goods
sold includes the cost of inventory, occupancy costs for stores and occupancy
and operating costs for the distribution center. Gross profit was $168.8
million, or 32.4% of net sales, in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, compared
with $173.1 million, or 33.8% of net sales, in the 53 week period of the prior
fiscal year. We attribute this decrease in gross profit to a slight
decrease in product margins and the deleveraging of store occupancy costs and
distribution expenses. Store occupancy experienced its largest
increases in rent expense and utilities expenses as a percent to
sales. Distribution expenses were impacted primarily in data
processing costs resulting from contract labor costs to support information
technology upgrades and projects.
Store operating, selling and
administrative expenses. Store operating, selling and administrative
expenses were $108.5 million, or 20.8% of net sales, for the 52 weeks ended
February 2, 2008, compared with $100.5 million, or 19.6% of net sales, for the
53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. Expenses contributing to this increase
included:
|
·
|
Salary
and benefit costs in our stores increased by 81 basis points while
decreasing 29 basis points at the administrative level. Store
costs were impacted by the lower than expected sales growth and larger
than normal fourth quarter store openings, while administrative salaries
decreased as a result of lost
bonuses.
|
|
·
|
Net
advertising expenses increased 18 basis points due to the increased
advertising efforts for new and low performing
stores.
|
|
·
|
Stock-based
compensation accounted for 15 basis points. The expense
associated with the movement of certain grant dates into the first quarter
as compared to a year ago was somewhat offset by a higher than normal
forfeiture of awards resulting from employee turnover and loss of
performance-based awards.
|
Depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales was 2.3% in
the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, and 2.1% in the 53 weeks ended February 3,
2007. The weighted-average lease term of new store leases added in
Fiscal 2008 compared to those added in Fiscal 2007 decreased in lease terms at
6.71 years compared to 7.62 years, respectively. We attribute the
increase in depreciation expense as a percent to sales to the shorter lease
terms as well as the information systems placed in service as of February 4,
2007.
Provision for income
taxes. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of net sales
was 3.5% in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008, compared to 4.8% for the 53
weeks ended February 3, 2007. The combined federal, state and local
effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income was 37.7% for Fiscal
2008 and 39.2% for Fiscal 2007. The decrease in rate over last year
is primarily the result of the favorable resolution of certain state tax issues,
lower than historical stock option exercise behavior, and higher than historical
equity forfeitures offset somewhat by the permanent differences related to
incentive stock options.
Fiscal
2007 Compared to Fiscal 2006
Net sales. Net sales
increased $71.8 million, or 16.3%, to $512.1 million for the 53 weeks ended
February 3, 2007, from $440.3 million for the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2006.
We attribute this increase to the following factors:
|
·
|
We
opened 74 Hibbett Sports and closed 8 Hibbett Sports stores and 2 Sports
Additions stores for net stores opened of 64 stores in the 53 weeks ended
February 3, 2007. New stores and stores not in the comparable store net
sales calculation accounted for $56.7 million of the increase in net
sales.
|
|
·
|
We
experienced a 3.8% increase in comparable store net sales for the 52 weeks
ended January 27, 2007 primarily as the result of an increase in
price. Higher comparable store net sales contributed $15.1
million to the increase in net
sales.
|
|
·
|
We
believe sales pick-up related to the 53rd
week contributed approximately 2.7% to the increase in sales over last
year.
|
We believe the increase in comparable
store sales is attributable to an overall positive merchandise performance
during the year and increased focus on customer
service. Additionally, our results were positively impacted in the
third quarter by the introduction of tax-free holidays in three of our states
and an increased promotional effort in an attempt to leverage the strong
post-hurricane sales from the prior year. We also experienced strong
seasonal sales in the last quarter of Fiscal 2007 related to the Christmas
holidays.
|
·
|
Nike
and Under Armour brands experienced solid performance in youth and cleats,
performance apparel and team
equipment.
|
|
·
|
Pro
and college licensed apparel performed well, particularly in youth
products and NFL jerseys. Key professional teams in our market
included the Indianapolis Colts, New Orleans Saints and Chicago
Bears. Top selling NFL jerseys included Peyton Manning, Reggie
Bush, Tony Romo and Brian Urlacher. College licensed apparel
was led by women’s Nike product.
|
|
·
|
We
continue to experience weakness in caps and in classics
footwear.
|
Comparable store net sales data for the
period reflects sales for our traditional format Hibbett Sports and Sports
Additions stores open throughout the period and the corresponding period of the
prior fiscal year. If a store remodel or relocation results in the
store being closed for a significant period of time, its sales are removed from
the comparable store base until it has been open a full 12
months. During the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2007, 459 stores were
included in the comparable store sales comparison. Our four Sports
& Co. stores are not and have never been included in the comparable store
net sales comparison because we have not opened a superstore since September
1996 nor do we plan to open additional superstores in the future.
Gross profit. Cost of goods
sold includes the cost of inventory, occupancy costs for stores and occupancy
and operating costs for the distribution center. Gross profit was $173.1
million, or 33.8% of net sales, in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, compared
with $146.9 million, or 33.4% of net sales, in the 52 week period of the prior
fiscal year. We attribute this increase in gross profit primarily to
a reduction in markdown rate. Occupancy, as a percent of net sales, improved by
31 basis points year over year due to decreases in common area maintenance and
rental expenses as a percentage of sales. Offsetting these decreases were
distribution center costs by 10 basis points, primarily due to the increased
repair and maintenance expenses and a decrease in vendor
violations.
Store operating, selling and
administrative expenses. Store operating, selling and administrative
expenses were $100.5 million, or 19.6% of net sales, for the 53 weeks ended
February 3, 2007, compared with $85.1 million, or 19.3% of net sales, for the 52
weeks ended January 28, 2006. These expenses increased as a percentage of net
sales between periods primarily due to the implementation of 123R which added 53
basis points in stock based compensation. Other trends experienced
included:
|
·
|
an
increase in legal fees as a percent of net sales of 8 basis points related
to pending litigation;
|
|
·
|
an
increase in credit/debit card fees as a percent of net sales of 7 basis
points related to the increased use of these tenders by our customers over
cash; and
|
|
·
|
decreases
as a percent of net sales in insurance costs of 11 basis points and
freight and shipping costs of 5 basis
points.
|
Depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation and amortization as a percentage of net sales was 2.1% in
the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, and 2.3% in the 52 weeks ended January 28,
2006. We experienced a slight trend upwards in the terms of our new
store leases which contributed to the leveraging of depreciation expense as
leasehold improvements were expensed over the longer lease term which, in most
cases, is less than the estimated useful life of the asset. Our
average lease term of leases added in Fiscal 2007 was 7.44 years compared to
7.15 years for leases added in Fiscal 2006.
Provision for income
taxes. Provision for income taxes as a percentage of net sales
was 4.8% in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007, compared to 4.4% for the 52
weeks ended January 28, 2006. The combined federal, state and local
effective income tax rate as a percentage of pre-tax income was 39.2% for Fiscal
2007 and 36.4% for Fiscal 2006. The increase in rate over last year
is primarily the result of the permanent difference related to incentive stock
options arising as a result of applying the provisions of SFAS No.
123R.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our capital requirements relate
primarily to new store openings, stock repurchases and working capital
requirements. Our working capital requirements are somewhat seasonal in nature
and typically reach their peak near the end of the third and the beginning of
the fourth quarters of our fiscal year. Historically, we have funded our cash
requirements primarily through our cash flow from operations and occasionally
from borrowings under our revolving credit facilities.
Our Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
February
2,
|
|
February
3,
|
|
January
28,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
$ |
48,022 |
|
|
$ |
36,462 |
|
|
$ |
38,061 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities:
|
|
(16,549 |
) |
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
(28,532 |
) |
Net
cash used in financing activities:
|
|
(51,098 |
) |
|
|
(29,042 |
) |
|
|
(41,927 |
) |
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
$ |
(19,625 |
) |
|
$ |
4,423 |
|
|
$ |
(32,398 |
) |
Operating
Activities.
Cash flow from operations is seasonal
in our business. Typically, we use cash flow from operations to
increase inventory in advance of peak selling seasons, such as pre-Christmas and
back-to-school. Inventory levels are reduced in connection with
higher sales during the peak selling seasons and this inventory reduction,
combined with proportionately higher net income, typically produces a positive
cash flow.
Net cash provided by operating
activities was $48.0 million for the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008 compared
with net cash provided by operating activities of $36.5 million and $38.1
million in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007 and the 52 weeks ended January
28, 2006, respectively.
Inventory levels have continued to
increase year over year as the number of stores have increased. The
increase in inventory used cash of $16.0 million, $16.4 million and $5.9 million
during Fiscal 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, while the accounts payable
increase provided cash of $22.1 million during Fiscal 2008 as we managed cash
while protecting vendor discounts. During Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal
2006, the accounts payable decrease used cash of $3.9 million and $4.3 million,
respectively. Net income provided cash of $30.3 million, $38.1
million and $33.6 million during Fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Also offsetting uses of cash were non-cash charges,
including depreciation and amortization expense of $12.2 million, $10.9 million
and $10.1 million during Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, respectively,
and stock-based compensation expense of $3.7 million and $2.8 million during
Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, respectively. A shift in the timing of
certain equity awards contributed to the increase in stock-based compensation in
Fiscal 2008 over Fiscal 2007.
Investing
Activities.
Cash used in investing activities in
the fiscal periods ended February 2, 2008, February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006
totaled $16.5 million, $3.0 million and $28.5 million,
respectively. Net purchases of short-term investments were $0.2
million during Fiscal 2008 compared to net redemptions of short-term investments
of $13.2 million during Fiscal 2007 and net purchases of short-term investments
of $13.2 million during Fiscal 2006. Gross capital expenditures used
$16.4 million, $16.3 million and $15.3 million during Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007
and Fiscal 2006, respectively. In Fiscal 2008, short-term investments
were redeemed for cash used in our stock repurchase program.
We use cash in investing activities to
build new stores and remodel or relocate existing
stores. Furthermore, net cash used in investing activities includes
purchases of information technology assets and expenditures for our distribution
facility and corporate headquarters.
We opened 84 new stores and relocated
and/or remodeled 13 existing stores during the 52 weeks ended February 2,
2008. We opened 74 new stores and relocated and/or remodeled 7
existing stores during the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007. We opened
74 new stores and relocated and/or remodeled 9 existing stores during the 52
weeks ended January 28, 2006.
We estimate the cash outlay for capital
expenditures in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 will be approximately
$24.0 million, which relates to the opening of approximately 85 new stores,
remodeling of selected existing stores, information system upgrades and various
improvements at our headquarters and distribution center. Of the
total budgeted dollars for capital expenditures for Fiscal 2009, we anticipate
that approximately 70% will be related to the opening of new stores and
remodeling and or relocating existing stores. Approximately 21% will
be related to information systems with the remaining 9% related primarily to
office expansion and security equipment for our stores.
As of February 2, 2008, we had an
approximate $0.1 million outlay remaining on enhancements to our JDA system
relating to inventory planning and replenishment. We anticipate that
these upgrades will be implemented in the first half of Fiscal 2009 and believe
these enhancements will help us develop better efficiencies in the allocation
and planning of inventory and better enable us to analyze and generally improve
sales across all markets and merchandise by allowing us to better analyze
inventory at the store level.
Financing
Activities.
Net cash used in financing activities
was $51.1 million in the 52 weeks ended February 2, 2008 compared to $29.0
million in the 53 weeks ended February 3, 2007 and $41.9 million in the 52 weeks
ended January 28, 2006, respectively. The cash fluctuation as
compared to prior fiscal years was primarily the result of the repurchase of our
common stock. We expended $52.7 million, $33.0 million and $45.3
million on repurchases of our common stock during Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007 and
Fiscal 2006, respectively.
Financing activities also consisted of
proceeds from transactions in our common stock and the excess tax benefit from
the exercise of incentive stock options. As stock options are
exercised, we will continue to receive proceeds and expect a tax deduction;
however, the amounts and timing cannot be predicted.
At February 2, 2008, we had a revolving
credit facility that allows borrowings up to $30.0 million and which renews in
August 2008. Under the provisions of this facility, we can draw down
funds when our main operating account falls below $100,000. The
facility does not require a commitment or agency fee and there are no covenant
restrictions associated with the facility. We plan to renew this
facility as it expires and do not anticipate any problems in doing so; however,
no assurance can be given that we will be granted a renewal or terms which are
acceptable to us.
Subsequent to fiscal year ended
February 2, 2008, we entered into an additional revolving credit facility that
allows borrowings up to $50.0 million to facilitate our stock repurchase
program. The facility is unsecured and expires on December 31,
2008. There are no covenant restrictions on this
facility.
At February 3, 2007, we had a revolving
credit facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million and renewed annually
in November. Under the provisions of this facility, we could draw
down funds when our main operating account fell below $100,000. The
facility did not require a commitment or agency fee and there were no covenant
restrictions associated with the facility.
At January 28, 2006, we had two
unsecured credit facilities that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million and
$10.0 million and which renewed annually in November. Under the provisions of
these facilities, we could draw down funds when our main operating account fell
below $100,000. Neither facility required a commitment or agency fee nor were
there any covenant requirements.
As of February 2, 2008, February 3,
2007 and January 28, 2006, we had no debt outstanding
under any of these facilities. Based on our current operating and store opening
plans and plans for the repurchase of our common stock, we believe we can fund
our cash needs for the foreseeable future through cash generated from operations
and, if necessary, through periodic future borrowings against our credit
facilities.
The following table lists the aggregate
maturities of various classes of obligations and expiration amounts of various
classes of commitments related to Hibbett Sports, Inc. at February 2,
2008:
|
Payments
due under contractual obligations (in thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term
Debt Obligations (1)
|
|
|
Capital
Lease Obligations (2)
|
|
|
Operating
Lease Obligations (3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fiscal
2009
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
40,332 |
|
|
$ |
40,332 |
|
Fiscal
2010
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
35,676 |
|
|
|
35,676 |
|
Fiscal
2011
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
28,735 |
|
|
|
28,735 |
|
Fiscal
2012
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,635 |
|
|
|
22,635 |
|
Fiscal
2013
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
32,280 |
|
|
|
32,280 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
177,177 |
|
|
$ |
177,177 |
|
(1)
|
See
“Debt” –
Consolidated Financial Statement Note 5 in Item
8.
|
(2)
|
As
of Fiscal 2008, we do not have any capital lease
obligations.
|
(3)
|
See
“Lease
Commitments” – Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9 in Item
8.
|
Approximately $2.3 million of
unrecognized tax benefits have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with
FIN No. 48 and we are uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be
settled.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have not provided any financial
guarantees as of February 2, 2008. All purchase obligations are cancelable and
therefore are not included in the table above.
We have not created, and are not party
to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising
capital, incurring debt or operating our business. We do not have any
arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into the
financial statements.
Inflation
and Other Economic Factors
Our ability to provide quality
merchandise on a profitable basis may be subject to economic factors and
influences that we cannot control. National or international events, including
the war on terrorism and unrest in the Middle East, could lead to disruptions in
economies in the United States or in foreign countries where a significant
portion of our merchandise is manufactured. These and other factors could
increase our merchandise costs and other costs that are critical to our
operations. Consumer spending could also decline because of economic
pressures.
Merchandise Costs. Based on
current economic conditions, we expect that any increase in merchandise costs
per unit will be offset by improved vendor discounts and increased retail prices
in Fiscal 2009.
Freight Costs. We continued
to experience rising fuel costs during Fiscal 2008 that increased our freight
costs and we expect that fuel costs may continue to rise in Fiscal 2009. We do
not expect increases in freight costs to have a material effect on our results
of operations as we continue to leverage the costs associated with inbound
freight against the cost of outbound freight.
Minimum Wage. Recent
increases in the mandated minimum wage have impacted our payroll costs. Congress
has approved federal minimum wage increases by approximately 41% over a three
year period with the first increase of approximately 14% taking place during
Fiscal 2008. By July 2009, the federal minimum wage will increase an
additional 24.0%. All of the states we operate in have either passed
legislation to raise the minimum wage or their minimum wage is increasing in
conjunction with the federal minimum wage. Some of the states have
automatic provision for future increase based on the Consumer Price Index or on
inflation.
Insurance
Costs. In Fiscal 2008, we continued to experience a decrease
in general business insurance that began in Fiscal 2007, when we changed to a
partially self-insured program for our workers’ compensation and general
liability. During both fiscal periods, we have experienced an increase in our
average monthly health insurance claims. In Fiscal 2006, we
experienced an increase in general business insurance costs due to raised limits
on Directors and Officers insurance and expanded coverage on our distribution
center. During the same period, health insurance declined due to a reduction in
claims. In Fiscal 2009, we expect that general business insurance
costs will stabilize while health insurance costs will increase
slightly.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159, “The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment
of FASB Statement 115.” This statement permits companies to
elect to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value. At
each reporting date subsequent to adoption, unrealized gains and losses on items
for which the fair value option has been elected must be reported in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 was effective as of the beginning of the first
fiscal year that began after November 15, 2007, or February 3, 2008 for our
Company. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material effect
on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements; however, SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We implemented SFAS No. 157 on February 3, 2008 and the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial statements.
Our
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies
reflected in the consolidated financial statements are detailed
below.
Revenue
Recognition. We
recognize revenue, including gift card and layaway sales, in accordance with the
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements,” as amended by SAB No. 104, “Revenue
Recognition.”
Retail merchandise sales occur on-site
in our retail stores. Customers have the option of paying the full purchase
price of the merchandise upon sale or paying a down payment and placing the
merchandise on layaway. The customer may make further payments in installments,
but the entire purchase price for merchandise placed on layaway must be received
by us within 30 days. The down payment and any installments are recorded by us
as short-term deferred revenue until the customer pays the entire purchase price
for the merchandise. We recognize revenue at the time the customer takes
possession of the merchandise. Retail sales are recorded net of
returns and discounts and exclude sales taxes.
The cost
of coupon sales incentives is recognized at the time the related revenue is
recognized by us. Proceeds received from the issuance of gift cards are
initially recorded as deferred revenue. Revenue is subsequently
recognized at the time the customer redeems the gift cards and takes possession
of the merchandise. Unredeemed gift cards are recorded as a current
liability.
It is not our policy to take unclaimed
layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards into income. As of
February 2, 2008, February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, there was no breakage
revenue recorded in income. The deferred revenue liability for
layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards was $2.1 million and $1.8 million at
February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively. Any unrecognized
breakage revenue is immaterial. We escheat unredeemed gift
cards.
Inventory
Valuation.
Lower of Cost or
Market: Beginning in
Fiscal 2008, inventory is valued using the lower of weighted-average cost or
market method. Market is determined based on estimated net realizable
value. We regularly review inventories to determine if the carrying
value exceeds realizable value, and we record a reserve to reduce the carrying
value to net realizable value as necessary. We account for
obsolescence as part of our lower of cost or market reserve based on historical
trends and specific identification. As of February 2, 2008, the
reserve was $1.5 million. There was no amount reserved as of February
3, 2007. Our inventory valuation reserves contain uncertainties as
the calculations require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment
regarding such factors as market conditions, the selling environment, historical
results and current inventory trends.
Prior to Fiscal 2008, cost was assigned
to store inventories using the retail inventory method. In using this method,
the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins were
computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value of
inventories. The retail method is an averaging method that has been widely used
in the retail industry and results in valuing inventories at lower of cost or
market when markdowns are taken as a reduction of the retail value of
inventories on a timely basis.
Our management believes that the
application of the cost method is preferable as compared to the retail method
because it increases the organizational focus on the actual margin realized on
each sale.
Shrink
Reserves: We accrue for
inventory shrinkage based on the actual historical shrink results of our most
recent physical inventories. These estimates are compared to actual results as
physical inventory counts are performed and reconciled to the general ledger.
Store counts are typically performed on a cyclical basis and the distribution
center’s counts are performed mid-year and in late December or early January
every year. As of February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, the reserve
was $0.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
Accrued
Expenses. On a
monthly basis, we estimate certain material expenses in an effort to record
those expenses in the period incurred. Our most material estimates relate to
payroll and payroll tax expenses, property taxes, insurance-related expenses and
utility expenses. Estimates are primarily based on current activity and
historical results and are adjusted as our estimates change. Differences in our
estimates and assumptions could result in an accrual materially different from
the accrual calculated. Historically, the differences in these accruals have not
had a material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
Income
Taxes. We
estimate the annual tax rate based on projected taxable income for the full year
and record a quarterly income tax provision in accordance with the anticipated
annual rate. As the year progresses, we refine the estimates of the
year’s taxable income as new information becomes available, including
year-to-date financial results. This continual estimation process
often results in a change to our expected effective tax rate for the
year. When this occurs, we adjust the income tax provision during the
quarter in which the change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date
provision reflects the expected annual tax rate. Significant judgment
is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax
position and changes in estimates could materially impact our results of
operations and financial position.
Uncertain Tax
Positions: We account for
uncertain tax positions in accordance with FIN No. 48. The
application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and
regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. As
such, we are required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments
regarding our income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance
surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. As
such, changes in our subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect
amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of
income. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Income
Taxes”, for additional detail on our uncertain tax positions.
Litigation
Accruals.
Estimated amounts for claims that are probable and can be reasonably
estimated are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The
likelihood of a material change in these estimated accruals would be dependent
on new claims as they may arise and the favorable or unfavorable outcome of a
particular litigation. As additional information becomes available, we assess
the potential liability related to pending litigation and revise estimates as
appropriate. Such revisions in estimates of the potential liability could
materially impact our results of operations and financial position.
Impairment of
Assets. We
continually evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that
indicate the remaining balance of long-lived assets and intangibles may be
impaired and not recoverable. Our policy is to recognize any impairment loss on
long-lived assets as a charge to current income when certain events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be
recoverable. Impairment is assessed considering the estimated
undiscounted cash flows over the asset’s remaining life. If estimated cash flows
are insufficient to recover the investment, an impairment loss is recognized
based on a comparison of the cost of the asset to fair value less any costs of
disposition.
Stock-Based
Compensation. We
use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the fair value at the
date of grant of stock options granted under our stock option plans and stock
purchase rights associated with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Volatility is
estimated as of the date of grant or purchase date based on management’s
estimate of the time period that captures the relative volatility of our stock.
We use the risk free interest rate on the date of grant or purchase date based
on the U.S. Treasury rate with maturities approximating the expected lives of
our options. The effects on net income and earnings per shares (EPS) of
stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, calculated using the fair value of
stock options and stock purchase rights in accordance with the Black-Scholes
options-pricing model are not necessarily representative of the effects of our
results of operations in the future. In addition, the compensation expense
utilizes an option-pricing model developed for traded options with relatively
short lives. Our stock option grants have a life of up to ten years and are not
transferable. Therefore, the actual fair value of a stock option grant may be
different from our estimates. We believe that our estimates incorporate all
relevant information and represent a reasonable approximation in light of the
difficulties involved in valuing non-traded stock options. All
estimates and assumptions are regularly evaluated and updated when
applicable.
Insurance
Accruals. We use
a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks including
employee-related health benefits, a portion of which is paid by our employees,
workers’ compensation and general liability. The estimates and accruals for
these liabilities associated with these risks are regularly evaluated for
adequacy based on the most current available information, including historical
claims experience and expected future claims costs.
Operating
Leases. We lease
our retail stores and distribution center under operating leases. Many lease
agreements contain rent holidays, rent escalation clauses and/or contingent rent
provisions. We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the expected
lease term, including cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such
options would result in an economic penalty. We use a time period for our
straight-line rent expense calculation that equals or exceeds the time period
used for depreciation. In addition, the commencement date of the lease term is
the earlier of the date when we become legally obligated for the rent payments
or the date when we take possession of the building for initial setup of
fixtures and merchandise.
Dividend
Policy
We have never declared or paid any
dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain our future earnings
to finance the growth and development of our business and for our stock
repurchase program, and therefore do not anticipate declaring or paying cash
dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future decision to
declare or pay dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and
will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems
relevant.
Controls
and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (See Item
9A).
Quarterly
and Seasonal Fluctuations
We have historically experienced and
expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and
operating income. Our net sales and operating income are typically higher in the
fourth quarter due to sales increases during the holiday selling season.
However, the seasonal fluctuations are mitigated by the strong product demand in
the spring and back-to-school sales periods. Our quarterly results of operations
may also fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, including
the timing of new store openings, the amount and timing of net sales contributed
by new stores, the level of pre-opening expenses associated with new stores, the
relative proportion of new stores to mature stores, merchandise mix, the
relative proportion of stores represented by each of our three store concepts
and demand for apparel and accessories driven by local interest in sporting
events.
Although our operations are influenced
by general economic conditions, we do not believe that, historically, inflation
has had a material impact on our results of operations as we are generally able
to pass along inflationary increases in costs to our
customers. However, in recent periods, we have experienced an impact
on overall sales due to a consumer spending slowdown spawned by higher gas
prices and a slump in the housing market.
Our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows are subject to market risk from interest rate
fluctuations on our credit facilities, which bear interest at rates that vary
with LIBOR, prime or quoted cost of funds rates. During the majority
of Fiscal 2008, we had only one facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0
million. In August 2007, we renewed this facility and increased the
allowed borrowings to $30.0 million. During the majority of Fiscal
2007 and all of Fiscal 2006, we had two operating facilities allowing combined
borrowings up to $25.0 million. Effective November 2006, we elected
to renew only one facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million and
renewed annually.
In February 2008, subsequent to our
fiscal year end, we added another facility which allows borrowings up to $50.0
million which we intend to use for our stock repurchase program. The
new facility expires in December 2008 and is renewable at that
time. Interest rates on this facility vary with the British Bankers
Association (BBA) LIBOR rate.
At the end of Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007
and Fiscal 2006, we had no borrowings outstanding under any credit facility.
There were 106 days during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008, where we
incurred borrowings against our credit facility for an average borrowing of $7.8
million. During Fiscal 2008, the maximum amount outstanding against these
agreements was $18.4 million and the weighted average interest rate was
5.64%. There were twenty-four days during the fifty-three weeks ended
February 3, 2007, where we incurred borrowings against our credit facilities for
an average and maximum borrowing of $2.5 million and $5.1 million and an average
interest rate of 6.12%. At no time during the fifty-two weeks ended
January 28, 2006, did we incur borrowings against our credit facility. A 10%
increase or decrease in market interest rates would not have a material impact
on our financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
The following consolidated financial
statements and supplementary data of our Company are included in response to
this item:
All other
schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required
information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes
thereto.
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Hibbett
Sports, Inc.:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Hibbett Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 2, 2008 and
February 3, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ investment, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended February 2, 2008. We also have audited the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008, based on the criteria
established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is
responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(Item 9A(b)). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over
financial reporting based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As
discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective February
4, 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for inventory and adopted
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. As
discussed in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January
29, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based
payments.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended February 2, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, Hibbett
Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of February 2, 2008, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Birmingham,
Alabama
April 1,
2008
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share and per share information)
ASSETS
|
February
2, 2008
|
|
February
3, 2007
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
10,742 |
|
|
$ |
30,367 |
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Trade
receivables, net
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
Accounts
receivable, other
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
Inventories
|
|
141,406 |
|
|
|
125,240 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
5,348 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
1,607 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
165,987 |
|
|
|
166,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
and building
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Equipment
|
|
40,338 |
|
|
|
32,946 |
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
20,991 |
|
|
|
18,846 |
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
57,599 |
|
|
|
50,767 |
|
Construction
in progress
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
|
121,737 |
|
|
|
107,221 |
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
75,232 |
|
|
|
64,648 |
|
Total
property and equipment
|
|
46,505 |
|
|
|
42,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
3,217 |
|
Other,
net
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Total
non-current assets
|
|
4,242 |
|
|
|
3,391 |
|
Total
Assets
|
$ |
216,734 |
|
|
$ |
212,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' INVESTMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$ |
64,125 |
|
|
$ |
42,016 |
|
Accrued
income taxes
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
5,338 |
|
Accrued
payroll expense
|
|
4,432 |
|
|
|
6,592 |
|
Deferred
rent
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
4,228 |
|
Other
accrued expense
|
|
2,980 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
76,604 |
|
|
|
60,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
rent
|
|
18,012 |
|
|
|
15,715 |
|
Accrued
income taxes
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total
non-current liabilities
|
|
21,075 |
|
|
|
15,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no
shares issued
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,162,201
and 36,047,732 shares issued at February 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
February 3, 2007, respectively
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Paid-in
capital
|
|
87,142 |
|
|
|
81,916 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
181,555 |
|
|
|
151,697 |
|
Treasury
stock at cost; 6,723,113 and 4,306,413 shares repurchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at
February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively
|
|
(150,004 |
) |
|
|
(97,332 |
) |
Total
stockholders' investment
|
|
119,055 |
|
|
|
136,641 |
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Investment
|
$ |
216,734 |
|
|
$ |
212,853 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share and per share information)
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
February
2, 2008
|
|
|
February
3, 2007
|
|
|
January
28, 2006
|
|
|
(52
weeks)
|
|
|
(53
weeks)
|
|
|
(52
weeks)
|
|
Net
sales
|
$ |
520,720 |
|
|
$ |
512,094 |
|
|
$ |
440,269 |
|
Cost
of goods sold, including distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
center
and store occupancy costs
|
|
351,876 |
|
|
|
338,963 |
|
|
|
293,368 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
168,844 |
|
|
|
173,131 |
|
|
|
146,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store
operating, selling and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses
|
|
108,463 |
|
|
|
100,461 |
|
|
|
85,060 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
12,154 |
|
|
|
10,932 |
|
|
|
10,119 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
48,227 |
|
|
|
61,738 |
|
|
|
51,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Interest
income, net
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,146 |
|
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
|
48,658 |
|
|
|
62,614 |
|
|
|
52,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
18,329 |
|
|
|
24,541 |
|
|
|
19,244 |
|
Net
income
|
$ |
30,329 |
|
|
$ |
38,073 |
|
|
$ |
33,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
31,049,058 |
|
|
|
32,094,127 |
|
|
|
33,605,568 |
|
Diluted
|
|
31,525,050 |
|
|
|
32,619,839 |
|
|
|
34,393,026 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share information)
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
February
2,
|
|
February
3,
|
|
January
28,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$ |
30,329 |
|
|
$ |
38,073 |
|
|
$ |
33,624 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
12,154 |
|
|
|
10,932 |
|
|
|
10,119 |
|
Deferred
income tax expense (benefit), net
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
(1,073 |
) |
|
|
(1,918 |
) |
Excess
tax benefit from stock option exercises
|
|
(520 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Loss
on disposal of assets, net
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables, net
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(263 |
) |
Accounts
receivable, other
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
Inventories
|
|
(16,022 |
) |
|
|
(16,378 |
) |
|
|
(5,853 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(3,530 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
Accrued
and refundable income taxes
|
|
(4,154 |
) |
|
|
6,005 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
Other
non-current assets
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
22,109 |
|
|
|
(3,913 |
) |
|
|
(4,259 |
) |
Deferred
rent, non-current
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
48,022 |
|
|
|
36,462 |
|
|
|
38,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Purchase)
sale of short-term investments, net
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
13,227 |
|
|
|
(13,227 |
) |
Capital
expenditures
|
|
(16,376 |
) |
|
|
(16,278 |
) |
|
|
(15,348 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
(16,549 |
) |
|
|
(2,997 |
) |
|
|
(28,532 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
used for stock repurchases
|
|
(52,672 |
) |
|
|
(32,958 |
) |
|
|
(45,263 |
) |
Excess
tax benefit from stock option exercises
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds
from options exercised and purchase of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
under the employee stock purchase plan
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
2,684 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
(51,098 |
) |
|
|
(29,042 |
) |
|
|
(41,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
(19,625 |
) |
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
|
(32,398 |
) |
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year
|
|
30,367 |
|
|
|
25,944 |
|
|
|
58,342 |
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Year
|
$ |
10,742 |
|
|
$ |
30,367 |
|
|
$ |
25,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
Income
taxes, net of refunds
|
$ |
22,031 |
|
|
$ |
19,608 |
|
|
$ |
20,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Schedule of Non-Cash Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
board compensation
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Shares
awarded to satisfy deferred board compensation
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(in
thousands, except share information)
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Total Stockholders'
Investment
|
Balance-January
29, 2005
|
|
35,232,998 |
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
68,798 |
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
|
1,268,100 |
|
$ |
(19,111 |
) |
|
$ |
130,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock
options, net of tax benefit $3,023
|
|
501,754 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of shares under the stock repurchase program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,859,600 |
|
|
(45,263 |
) |
|
|
(45,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance-January
28, 2006
|
|
35,734,752 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
75,166 |
|
|
|
113,624 |
|
|
|
3,127,700 |
|
|
(64,374 |
) |
|
|
124,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock
options, net of tax benefit $2,539
|
|
312,980 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
to income tax benefit from exercises of employee stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of shares under the stock repurchase program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178,713 |
|
|
(32,958 |
) |
|
|
(32,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance-February
3, 2007
|
|
36,047,732 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
81,916 |
|
|
|
151,697 |
|
|
|
4,306,413 |
|
|
(97,332 |
) |
|
|
136,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
effect of adopting FIN No. 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of shares from the employee stock purchase plan and the exercise of stock
options, net of tax benefit $275
|
|
114,469 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of shares under the stock repurchase program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,416,700 |
|
|
(52,672 |
) |
|
|
(52,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance-February
2, 2008
|
|
36,162,201 |
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
87,142 |
|
|
$ |
181,555 |
|
|
|
6,723,113 |
|
$ |
(150,004 |
) |
|
$ |
119,055 |
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Business
Hibbett Sports, Inc. is an operator of
sporting goods retail stores in small to mid-sized markets predominately in the
Sunbelt, Mid-Atlantic and the lower Midwest. Our fiscal year ends on the
Saturday closest to January 31 of each year. The consolidated statement of
operations for fiscal year ended February 2, 2008, includes 52 weeks of
operations. The consolidated statement of operations for fiscal year ended
February 3, 2007, includes 53 weeks of operations while the consolidated
statements of operations for fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 includes 52
weeks of operations. Our merchandise assortment features a core selection of
brand name merchandise emphasizing individual team sports equipment, athletic
and fashion apparel and footwear related accessories. We complement
this core assortment with a selection of localized apparel and accessories
designed to appeal to a wide range of customers within each market.
Accounting
Changes
Change in Accounting
Principle – Inventories
On February 4, 2007, the first day of
Fiscal 2008, we changed our inventory valuation method. Previously,
inventories were principally valued at the lower of cost or market using the
retail method. Commencing in Fiscal 2008, inventories are principally
valued at the lower of cost or market, using the weighted-average cost
method.
SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections – A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No.
3,” requires a retrospective application of changes in accounting
principles. However the effect of this change in accounting principle
for periods prior to Fiscal 2008 is not determinable, as the period-specific
information required to value inventory using the weighted-average cost method
is not available for periods prior to February 4, 2007. This change
was recognized as a net increase of $143,000 to inventory, an increase of
$60,000 to deferred tax liabilities and a cumulative effect to retained earnings
of $83,000. This change in valuation method did not have a material
impact on net income or diluted earnings per share.
We believe the new accounting method of
weighted-average cost is preferable to the retail method of inventory valuation
because it will produce more accurate inventory amounts reported in the balance
sheet and, in turn, more accurate cost of sales in the income
statement. The new JDA Merchandising System, implemented in Fiscal
2008, has facilitated our ability to value our inventory on the weighted-average
cost method.
Adoption of FIN No.
48
On February 4, 2007,we adopted the
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN No. 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN No.
48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income
Taxes,” by prescribing the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. Under FIN No. 48, the financial statement effects of a tax
position should initially be recognized when it is more-likely-than-not, based
on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon
examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold should initially and subsequently be measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater then 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority.
As a result of implementing FIN No. 48,
we increased the liability for unrecognized tax benefits by $3.8 million,
increased deferred tax assets by $3.2 million and reduced retained earnings as
of February 4, 2007, by $0.6 million. Our total liability for
unrecognized tax benefits as of February 4, 2007 amounted to $5.7 million.
As of
February 2, 2008, our total liability for unrecognized tax benefits amounted to
$3.0 million of which $1.0 million would affect the effective tax rate if
recognized.
We filed for an accounting method
change with the Internal Revenue Service before the end of Fiscal 2008 which
resulted in a reduction of approximately $2.9 million of our liability for prior
year unrecognized tax benefits. We expect to recognize this liability
ratably over the next four years.
We classify interest and penalties
recognized on the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income tax
expense. The associated amounts included in our total liability for
unrecognized tax benefits were $345,000 as of February 2, 2008 and $567,000 as
of February 3, 2007.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements
of our Company include its accounts and the accounts of all wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Occasionally, certain reclassifications are made to
conform previously reported data to the current presentation. Such
reclassifications had no impact on total assets, net income or stockholders’
investment.
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial
Statements
The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of certain assets and
liabilities and disclosure of certain contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the consolidated financial statements and (2) the reported amounts of
certain revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Reportable
Segments
Given the economic characteristics of
the store formats, the similar nature of products offered for sale, the type of
customers, the methods of distribution and how our Company is managed, our
operations constitute only one reportable segment.
Customers
No customer accounted for more than
5.0% of our sales during the years ended February 2, 2008, February 3, 2007 and
January 28, 2006.
Vendor
Arrangements
We enter into arrangements with some of
our vendors that entitle us to a partial refund of the cost of merchandise
purchased during the year or reimbursement of certain costs we incur to
advertise or otherwise promote their product. The volume based rebates,
supported by a vendor agreement, are estimated throughout the year and reduce
the cost of inventory and cost of goods sold during the year. This estimate is
regularly monitored and adjusted for current or anticipated changes in purchase
levels and for sales activity.
We also receive vendor support through
a variety of other programs, including markdown reimbursements, vendor
compliance and defective merchandise. If the payment is a
reimbursement for costs incurred, it is offset against those related costs;
otherwise, it is treated as a reduction to the cost of
merchandise. Markdown reimbursements related to merchandise that has
been sold are negotiated by our merchandising teams and are credited directly to
Cost of Goods Sold in the period received. If vendor funds are
received prior to merchandise being sold, they are recorded as a reduction of
merchandise cost.
Cost
of Goods Sold
We include inbound freight charges,
merchandise purchases, store occupancy costs and a portion of our distribution
costs related to our retail business in cost of goods sold. Outbound freight
charges associated with moving merchandise to and between stores are included in
store operating, selling and administrative expenses.
Advertising
We expense advertising costs when
incurred. We participate in various advertising and marketing cooperative
programs with our vendors, who, under these programs, reimburse us for certain
costs incurred. A receivable for cooperative advertising to be reimbursed is
recorded as a decrease to expense as advertisements are run.
The following table presents the
components of our advertising expense (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
February
2,
|
|
February
3,
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Gross
advertising costs
|
|
$ |
6,519 |
|
|
$ |
5,194 |
|
|
$ |
4,727 |
|
Advertising
reimbursements
|
|
|
(3,609 |
) |
|
|
(3,225 |
) |
|
|
(2,935 |
) |
Net
advertising costs
|
|
$ |
2,910 |
|
|
$ |
1,969 |
|
|
$ |
1,792 |
|
Stock
Repurchase Program
In August 2004, our Board of Directors
(the Board) authorized a plan to repurchase our common stock. The Board has
subsequently authorized increases to this plan with a current authorization
effective November 2007 of $250.0 million. Stock repurchases may be
made in the open market or in negotiated transactions until January 30, 2010,
with the amount and timing of repurchases dependent on market conditions and at
the discretion of our management.
We repurchased 2,416,700, 1,178,713 and
1,859,600 shares of our common stock during years ended February 2, 2008,
February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, respectively, at a cost of approximately
$52.7 million, $33.0 million and $45.3 million, respectively. As of February 2,
2008, we had repurchased a total of 6,723,113 shares of our common stock at an
approximate cost of $150.0 million. We have approximately $100.0 million
available for stock repurchase as of February 2, 2008.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
We consider all short-term, highly
liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less, including
commercial paper and money market funds, to be cash
equivalents. Amounts due from third party credit card processors for
the settlement of debit and credit card transactions are included as cash
equivalents as they are generally collected within three business
days. Cash equivalents related to credit and debit card transactions
at February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 were $2.4 million and $2.2 million,
respectively.
Short-Term
Investments
All investments with original
maturities of greater than 90 days are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No.
115, “Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” We determine the
appropriate classification at the time of purchase. We held approximately
$191,000 of investments in securities at February 2, 2008. We did not
hold any investments in securities at February 3, 2007. Our
investments in securities primarily consisted of municipal bonds classified as
available-for-sale. Investments in these securities are recorded at cost, which
approximates fair value. Despite the long-term nature of their stated
contractual maturities, we believe there is a ready liquid market for these
securities. As a result, there are no cumulative gross unrealized holding gains
(losses) or gross realized gains (losses) from our securities. All income
generated from these securities is recorded as interest income. We
continually evaluate our short-term investments for other than temporary
impairment.
Trade
and Other Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable consists
primarily of amounts due to us from sales to educational institutions and youth
associations. We do not require collateral and we maintain an allowance for
potential uncollectible accounts based on an analysis of the aging of accounts
receivable at the date of the financial statements, historical losses and
existing economic conditions, when relevant. The allowance for doubtful accounts
at February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was $46,000 and $34,000,
respectively.
Other accounts receivable consisted
primarily of tenant allowances due from landlords and cooperative advertising
due from vendors, all of which are deemed to be collectible.
Inventories
and Valuation
Lower of Cost or
Market: Beginning in Fiscal 2008, inventories are valued using
the lower of weighted-average cost or market method. Market is
determined based on estimated net realizable value. We regularly
review inventories to determine if the carrying value exceeds realizable value,
and we record a reserve to reduce the carrying value to net realizable value as
necessary. We account for obsolescence as part of our lower of cost
or market reserve based on historical trends and specific
identification. As of February 2, 2008, the reserve was $1.5
million. There was no amount reserved as of February 3,
2007. A determination of net realizable value requires significant
judgment and estimates.
Previously, we valued inventories at
the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method of accounting,
with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis and market based on the
lower of replacement cost or estimated realizable value. We believe
the cost method is preferable as compared to the retail method because it will
increase the organizational focus on the actual margin realized on each
sale.
Shrinkage: We
accrue for inventory shrinkage based on the actual historical shrink results of
our most recent physical inventories. These estimates are compared to
actual results as physical inventory counts are performed and reconciled to the
general ledger. Store counts are typically performed on a cyclical
basis and the distribution center’s counts are performed mid-year and in late
December or early January every year. As of February 2, 2008 and
February 3, 2007, the reserve was $0.9 million and $2.0 million,
respectively.
Inventory Purchase
Concentration: Our business is dependent to a significant
degree upon close relationships with our vendors. Our largest vendor,
Nike, represented approximately 48.5%, 47.3% and 44.9% of our purchases in
Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, respectively. Our next
largest vendor in Fiscal 2008 represented approximately 9.3%, 9.4% and 11.3% of
our purchases in Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006,
respectively. Our third largest vendor in Fiscal 2008 represented
approximately 6.6%, 4.8% and 3.2% of our purchases in Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007
and Fiscal 2006, respectively.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at
cost. Depreciation on assets is principally provided using the straight-line
method over their estimated service lives (3 to 5 years for equipment, 7 years
for furniture and fixtures and 39 years for buildings) or, in the case of
leasehold improvements, the shorter of the initial term of the underlying leases
or the estimated economic lives of the improvements (typically 3 to 10
years).
Construction in progress is comprised
primarily of property and equipment related to unopened stores and costs
associated with technology upgrades at period end. At fiscal year
ended February 3, 2007, construction in progress was comprised mostly of system
costs associated with the JDA Merchandising System which was implemented on
February 4, 2007.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated depreciation of assets sold,
retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from property and equipment and the
related gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, “Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use,” provides
guidance on accounting for such costs. SOP 98-1 requires computer
software costs that are incurred in the preliminary project stage to be expensed
as incurred. Once the capitalization criteria of SOP 98-1 have been
met, directly attributable development costs should be
capitalized. It also provides that upgrade and maintenance costs
should be expensed. Our treatment of such costs is consistent with
SOP 98-1, with the costs capitalized being amortized over the expected useful
life of the software. For the fiscal year ended February 2, 2008,
there were no costs capitalized under SOP 98-1. For the fiscal year
ended February 3, 2007, we capitalized approximately $120,000 under SOP 98-1
associated with the implementation of our new merchandising
software.
Deferred
Rent
Deferred rent primarily consists of
step rent and allowances from landlords related to our leased properties. Step
rent represents the difference between actual operating lease payments due and
straight-line rent expense, which is recorded by the Company over the term of
the lease, including the build-out period. This amount is recorded as deferred
rent in the early years of the lease, when cash payments are generally lower
than straight-line rent expense, and reduced in the later years of the lease
when payments begin to exceed the straight-line expense. Landlord allowances are
generally comprised of amounts received and/or promised to us by landlords and
may be received in the form of cash or free rent. We record a receivable from
the landlord and a deferred rent liability when the allowances are earned. This
deferred rent is amortized into income (through lower rent expense) over the
term (including the pre-opening build-out period) of the applicable lease, and
the receivable is reduced as amounts are received from the
landlord.
On our statements of cash flows, the
current and long-term portions of landlord allowances are included as changes in
cash flows from operations. The current portion is included as a
change in accrued expenses and the long-term portion is included as a change in
deferred rent, non-current. The liability for the current portion of
unamortized landlord allowances was $3.9 million and $3.1 million at February 2,
2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively. The liability for the
long-term portion of unamortized landlord allowances was $14.6 million and $12.6
million at February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively. The
non-cash portion of landlord allowances received is immaterial.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue, including gift
card and layaway sales, in accordance with the SEC SAB No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements,” as amended by SAB No. 104, “Revenue
Recognition.”
Retail merchandise sales occur on-site
in our retail stores. Customers have the option of paying the full purchase
price of the merchandise upon sale or paying a down payment and placing the
merchandise on layaway. The customer may make further payments in installments,
but the entire purchase price for merchandise placed on layaway must be received
by the Company within 30 days. The down payment and any installments are
recorded by us as short-term deferred revenue until the customer pays the entire
purchase price for the merchandise. We recognize revenue at the time the
customer takes possession of the merchandise. Retail sales are
recorded net of returns and discounts and exclude sales taxes.
The cost of coupon sales incentives is
recognized at the time the related revenue is recognized by the Company.
Proceeds received from the issuance of gift cards are initially recorded as
deferred revenue. Revenue is subsequently recognized at the time the
customer redeems the gift cards and takes possession of the
merchandise. Unredeemed gift cards are recorded as a current
liability.
It is not our policy to take unclaimed
layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards into income. For the years
ended February 2, 2008, February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, there was no
breakage revenue recorded in income. The deferred revenue liability
for layaway deposits and unredeemed gift cards was $2.1 million and $1.8 million
at February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, respectively. Any
unrecognized breakage revenue is immaterial. We escheat unredeemed
gift cards.
Store
Opening and Closing Costs
New store opening costs, including
pre-opening costs, are charged to expense as incurred. Store opening costs
primarily include payroll expenses, training costs and straight-line rent
expenses. All pre-opening costs are included in store operating, selling and
administrative expenses as a part of operating expenses.
We consider individual store closings
to be a normal part of operations and regularly review store performance against
expectations. Costs associated with store closings are recognized at the time of
closing or when a liability has been incurred.
Accounting
for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We continually evaluate whether events
and circumstances have occurred that indicate the remaining balance of
long-lived assets and intangibles may be impaired and not recoverable. Our
policy is to recognize any impairment loss on long-lived assets as a charge to
current income when certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is
assessed considering the estimated undiscounted cash flows over the asset’s
remaining life. If estimated cash flows are insufficient to recover the
investment, an impairment loss is recognized based on a comparison of the cost
of the asset to fair value less any costs of disposition.
Self-Insurance
Accrual
We are self-insured for a significant
portion of our health insurance. Liabilities associated with the risks that are
retained by us are estimated, in part, by considering our historical claims. The
estimated accruals for these liabilities could be affected if future occurrences
and claims differ from our assumptions. To minimize our potential exposure, we
carry stop-loss insurance which reimburses us for losses over $100,000 per
covered person per year or $2.0 million per year in the aggregate. As
of February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007, the accrual for these liabilities was
$450,000 and $350,000, respectively, and was included in accrued expenses in the
consolidated balance sheets.
We are also self-insured for our
workers’ compensation and general liability insurance up to an established
deductible with a cumulative stop loss. As of February 2, 2008 and
February 3, 2007, the accrual for these liabilities (which is not discounted)
was $200,000 and was included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance
sheets.
Sales
Returns, net
Net sales returns were $18.3 million
for Fiscal 2008, $14.2 million for Fiscal 2007 and $12.1 million for Fiscal
2006. The accrual for the effect of estimated returns on pre-tax income was
$181,000 and $124,000 as of February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007,
respectively, and was included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance
sheets.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
We believe that the carrying amount
approximates fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments,
receivables and accounts payable, because of the short maturities of those
instruments.
NOTE
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159, “The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment
of FASB Statement 115.” This statement permits companies to
elect to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value. At
each reporting date subsequent to adoption, unrealized gains and losses on items
for which the fair value option has been elected must be reported in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 was effective as of the beginning of the first
fiscal year that began after November 15, 2007, or February 3, 2008 for our
Company. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material effect
on our consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements; however, SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. We implemented SFAS No. 157 on February 3, 2008 and the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material effect on our consolidated
financial statements.
At February 2, 2008, we had four
stock-based compensation plans:
|
(a)
|
The
Amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) provides that the
Board of Directors may grant equity awards to certain employees of the
Company at its discretion. The Incentive Plan authorizes grants
of equity awards of up to 1,233,159 authorized, but unissued shares of
common stock which includes 483,159 shares carried forward from the
original 1996 Stock Option Plan (1996 Plan), as amended, plus an
additional 750,000 shares approved for issuance effective July 1,
2005. At February 2, 2008, there were 1,011,202 shares
available for grant under the Incentive
Plan.
|
|
(b)
|
The
Amended 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) allows for qualified
employees to participate in the purchase of up to 204,794 shares of our
common stock at a price equal to 85% of the lower of the closing price at
the beginning or end of each quarterly stock purchase
period. At February 2, 2008, there were 159,166 shares
available for purchase under the
ESPP.
|
|
(c)
|
The
Amended 2005 Director Deferred Compensation Plan (Deferred Plan) allows
non-employee directors an election to defer all or a portion of their fees
into stock units, stock options or cash. The Deferred Plan
authorizes grants of stock up to 112,500 authorized, but unissued shares
of common stock. At February 2, 2008, there were 110,052 shares
available for grant under the Deferred
Plan.
|
|
(d)
|
The
Amended 2006 Non-Employee Director Equity Plan (DEP) provides for grants
of equity awards to non-employee directors. The DEP authorizes
grants of equity awards of up to 672,975 authorized, but unissued shares
of common stock which includes 172,975 shares carried forward from the
original Stock Plan for Outside Directors (Director Plan), plus an
additional 500,000 shares approved for issuance effective June 1,
2006. At February 2, 2008, there were 635,730 shares available
for grant under the DEP.
|
Effective January 29, 2006, we adopted
the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments,” using
the modified prospective transition method. Under this method,
compensation cost recognized in the periods ended February 2, 2008 and February
3, 2007 included: (a) compensation expense for all share-based payments granted
prior to, but not yet vested as of January 28, 2006, based on the grant date
fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation,” and (b) compensation expense for all share-based payments
granted on or after January 29, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R. The
fair value of each stock option was estimated on the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with various assumptions used for new grants
as described below. Compensation expense for new stock options and
nonvested equity awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period. In accordance with the modified prospective method, results
for prior periods have not been restated.
Prior to January 29, 2006, we accounted
for our stock-based compensation plans under the recognition and measurement
principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees,” and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, no
compensation cost for stock options was reflected in net earnings, as all
options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market
value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. In
addition, no compensation expense was recognized for common stock purchases
under the ESPP.
The following table illustrates the
pro-forma effect on net income and earnings per share for the fiscal year ended
January 28, 2006 as if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123, as amended, to stock-based compensation (in thousands, except per
share data):
Net
income, as reported
|
|
$ |
33,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Stock-based
employee compensation expense, included in the determination of net
income, net of tax
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Stock-based
employee compensation expense, determined under the fair value based
method for all awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,778 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income, pro-forma
|
|
$ |
29,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
- as reported
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Basic
- pro-forma
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
- as reported
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
Diluted
- pro-forma
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
Our plans allow for a variety of equity
awards including stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation
rights and performance awards. As of February 2, 2008 the Company had
only granted awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock units
(RSUs). RSUs and options to purchase our common stock have been
granted to officers, directors and key employees. Beginning with the
adoption of the Incentive Plan, a greater proportion of the awards granted to
employees, including executive employees, have been RSUs as opposed to stock
options when compared to grants made in prior years. The annual grant
made for Fiscal 2008 to employees consisted solely of RSUs. We have
also awarded RSUs that are performance-based to our named executive officers and
expect the Compensation Committee of the Board will continue to grant more
performance-based awards to key employees in the future. The terms
and vesting schedules for stock-based awards vary by type of grant and generally
vest upon time-based conditions. Upon exercise, stock-based
compensation awards are settled with authorized but unissued company
stock.
The compensation cost that has been
charged against income for these plans was as follows for the fiscal years ended
February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February
2,
|
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Stock-based
compensation expense by type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
2,104 |
|
Restricted
stock awards
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
Employee
stock purchase
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
Director
deferred compensation
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
Tax
benefit recognized
|
|
|
894 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
Stock-based
compensation expense, net of tax
|
|
$ |
2,783 |
|
|
$ |
2,288 |
|
In accordance with SAB No. 107, “Share-Based Payment,” issued
in March 2005, share-based plan expense has been included in store operating,
selling and administrative expense since it is incentive
compensation. Certain other deferred stock compensation plans are
also reflected in store operating, selling and administrative
expense. There is no capitalized stock-based compensation
cost.
The tax benefit recognized in our
consolidated financial statements, as disclosed above, is based on the amount of
compensation expense recorded for book purposes. The actual tax
benefit realized in our tax return is based on the intrinsic value, or the
excess of the market value over the exercise or purchase price, of stock options
exercised and restricted stock awards vested during the period. The
actual tax benefit realized for the deductions considered on our tax returns for
the fiscal years ended February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was from option
exercises and totaled $0.6 million and $2.7 million,
respectively.
Stock
Options
Stock options are granted with an
exercise price equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the date
of grant. During the period between July 2005 and December 2006,
stock options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market
price of our common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of
grant. Vesting and expiration provisions vary between equity
plans. Grants awarded to employees under the 1996 Plan, as amended,
vest over a five year period in equal installments beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant date and expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of
grant. Grants awarded to employees under the Incentive Plan vest over
a four year period in equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of
the grant date and expire on the eighth anniversary of the date of grant with
the exception of a grant made on August 18, 2005, whose provisions provided for
the five year vesting schedule and ten year term described in the 1996
Plan. Grants awarded to outside directors under both the DEP and
Deferred Plan, vest immediately upon grant and expire on the tenth anniversary
of the date of grant.
Following is the weighted average fair
value of each option granted during the fiscal year ended February 2,
2008. The fair value was estimated on the date of grant using the
Black Scholes pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for
each period:
|
|
|
Quarter
4
|
|
Quarter
3
|
|
Quarter
2
|
|
Quarter
1
|
|
2/2/2008
|
|
11/3/2007
|
|
8/4/2007
|
|
5/5/2007
|
Grant
date
|
|
|
9/30/2007
|
|
6/30/2007
|
|
3/31/2007
|
3/19/2007
|
Weighted
average fair value at date of grant
|
$8.43
|
|
$9.56
|
|
$9.89
|
|
$10.68
|
$10.56
|
Expected
option life (years)
|
4.20
|
|
4.20
|
|
4.07
|
|
4.07
|
4.07
|
Expected
volatility
|
48.01%
|
|
41.07%
|
|
36.33%
|
|
39.22%
|
39.22%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.39%
|
|
4.11%
|
|
5.00%
|
|
4.55%
|
4.53%
|
Dividend
yield
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
None
|
We calculate the expected term for our
stock options based on historical employee exercise
behavior. Historically, an increase in our stock price has led to a
pattern of earlier exercise by employees. We also expected the
reduction of the contractual term from 10 years to 8 years to facilitate a
pattern of earlier exercise by employees and to contribute to a gradual decline
in the average expected term in future periods. For the last two
years, the Compensation Committee has awarded RSUs rather than options to our
employees. With the absence of new grants, the expected term may
increase slightly because it will be affected to a greater extent by director
options which have a longer contractual life.
The volatility used to value stock
options is based on historical volatility. We calculate historical
volatility using an average calculation methodology based on daily price
intervals as measured over the expected term of the option. We have
consistently applied this methodology since our adoption of the original
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123.
Beginning with awards granted in the
second quarter of Fiscal 2008, we based the risk-free interest rate on the
annual continuously compounded risk-free rate with a term equal to the option’s
expected term. Previously, we used the market yield on U.S. Treasury
securities. While the difference between the two rates is minimal and
has only a slight effect on the fair value calculation, we believe using the
annual continuously compounded risk-free rate is more compliant with SFAS No.
123R. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero since we have no
current plan to declare dividends.
Activity for our option plans during
the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value ($000's)
|
|
Options
outstanding at February 3, 2007
|
|
|
1,387,388 |
|
|
$ |
15.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
29,795 |
|
|
|
27.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(96,007 |
) |
|
|
19.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited,
cancelled or expired
|
|
|
(37,418 |
) |
|
|
26.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding at February 2, 2008
|
|
|
1,283,758 |
|
|
$ |
15.89 |
|
|
5.77 |
|
$ |
7,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at February 2, 2008
|
|
|
825,921 |
|
|
$ |
13.56 |
|
|
5.46 |
|
$ |
6,153 |
|
The weighted average grant fair value
of options granted during the fiscal years ended February 2, 2008 and February
3, 2007 was $10.39 and $12.83, respectively. The compensation expense
included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized
during the fiscal years was $2.1 million in each year before the recognized
income tax benefit of $0.3 million in each year.
The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised during the fiscal years ended February 2, 2008, February 3,
2007 and January 28, 2006 was $1.9 million, $7.1 million and $8.4 million,
respectively. The intrinsic value of stock options is defined as the
difference between the current market value and the grant price. The
total cash received from these stock option exercises during Fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006 was $0.9 million, $2.3 million and $2.9 million,
respectively. Excess tax receipts from stock option exercises are
included in cash flows from financing activities as required by SFAS No.
123R. As of February 2, 2008, there was $2.8 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. This cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0
years.
Restricted
Stock Awards
Restricted stock awards are granted
with a fair value equal to the closing market price of our common stock on the
date of grant with the exception of those granted between August 2005 and
December 2006 which were granted with a fair value equal to the closing market
price of our common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of
grant. Compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the
vesting period. Restricted stock awards generally cliff vest in four
to five years from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the
restricted stock awards activity under all of our plans during the fifty-two
weeks ended February 2, 2008:
|
|
Number
of Awards
|
|
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Restricted
stock awards outstanding at February 3, 2007
|
|
|
87,923 |
|
|
$ |
29.66 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
124,425 |
|
|
|
28.30 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Forfeited,
cancelled or expired
|
|
|
(69,302 |
) |
|
|
28.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
stock awards outstanding at February 2, 2008
|
|
|
143,046 |
|
|
$ |
29.28 |
|
The weighted average grant date fair
value of our RSUs granted was $28.30 and $31.55 for the fiscal years ended
February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007. There were 124,325 and 60,510
RSUs granted during Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007, respectively. The compensation
expense included in store operating, selling and administrative expenses and
recognized during Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007 was $1.5 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, before the recognized income tax benefit of $0.6 million and $0.2
million, respectively.
As of February 2, 2008, no RSUs granted
had vested. The total intrinsic value of our restricted stock awards
outstanding and unvested at February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was $2.7
million and $2.8 million, respectively. As of February 2, 2008, there
was approximately $2.5 million of total unamortized unrecognized compensation
cost related to restricted stock awards. This cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 3.0 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The Company’s ESPP allows eligible
employees the right to purchase shares of our common stock, subject to certain
limitations, at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value at the end of each
calendar quarter (purchase date) or the beginning of each calendar
quarter. Our employees purchased 18,462 shares of common stock at an
average price of $21.25 per share during the fiscal year ended February 2,
2008. The assumptions used in the option pricing model for the
fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008 were: (a) expected life of 3
months (.25 years); (b) volatility between 36.3% and 41.8%; (c) risk-free
interest rate between 3.99% and 5.08%; and (d) dividend yield of
0.0%. The weighted average grant date fair value of ESPP options
granted during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008 was
$5.90.
During the fiscal year ended February
3, 2007, our employees purchased 17,992 shares of common stock at an average
price of $22.02 per share through the ESPP. The assumptions used in
the option pricing model for the fifty-three weeks ended February 3, 2007
were: (a) expected life of 3 months (.25 years); (b) volatility
between 40.7% and 41.0%; (c) risk-free interest rate between 3.98% and 4.93%;
and (d) dividend yield of 0.0%. The weighted average grant date fair
value of ESPP options granted during the fifty-three weeks ended February 3,
2007 was $5.93.
The expense related to the ESPP was
determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the provisions of
FASB Technical Bulletin (“FTB”) No. 97-1, “Accounting under Statement 123 for
Certain Employee Stock Purchase Plans with a Look-Back Option,” as
amended by SFAS No. 123R. The compensation expense included in store
operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during the fiscal
years ended February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007 was approximately $97,000 and
$99,000, respectively. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the
ESPP was considered noncompensatory and no expense was recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations.
Director
Deferred Compensation
Under the Deferred Plan, non-employee
directors can elect to defer all or a portion of their board and board committee
fees into cash, stock options or deferred stock units. Those fees
deferred into stock options are subject to the same provisions as provided for
in the DEP and are expensed and accounted for accordingly. Director
fees deferred into our common stock are calculated and expensed each calendar
quarter by taking total fees earned during the calendar quarter and dividing by
the closing price on the last day of the calendar quarter, rounded to the
nearest whole share. The total annual retainer, board and board
committee fees for non-employee directors that are not deferred into stock
options, but which includes amounts deferred into stock units under the Deferred
Plan, are expensed as incurred in all periods presented. A total of
1,306, 1,142 and 581 stock units were deferred under this plan in Fiscal 2008,
Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, respectively.
The compensation expense included in
store operating, selling and administrative expenses and recognized during
Fiscal 2008 and Fiscal 2007 was approximately $33,000 and $31,000, respectively
before the recognized income tax benefit of approximately $12,000 in both fiscal
years.
NOTE
4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The computation of basic earnings per
share (EPS) is based on the number of weighted-average common shares outstanding
during the period. The computation of diluted EPS is based on the
weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the incremental shares that
would be outstanding assuming exercise of dilutive stock options and issuance of
restricted stock. The number of incremental shares is calculated by
applying the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February
3,
|
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
income, in thousands
|
|
$ |
30,329 |
|
|
$ |
38,073 |
|
|
$ |
33,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
31,049,058 |
|
|
|
32,094,127 |
|
|
|
33,605,568 |
|
Stock
options
|
|
|
427,822 |
|
|
|
500,478 |
|
|
|
787,458 |
|
Restricted
stock
|
|
|
48,170 |
|
|
|
25,234 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive
shares
|
|
|
31,525,050 |
|
|
|
32,619,839 |
|
|
|
34,393,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
In calculating diluted earnings per
share for the fifty-two weeks ended February 2, 2008, options to purchase
455,598 shares of common stock were outstanding as of the end of the period, but
were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share due to their
anti-dilutive effect. In calculating diluted earnings per share for
the fifty-three weeks ended February 3, 2007, options to purchase 135,706 shares
of common stock were outstanding as of the end of the period, but were not
included in the computation of diluted earnings per share due to their
anti-dilutive effect. In calculating diluted earnings per share for
the fifty-two weeks ended January 28, 2006, options to purchase 49,000 shares of
common stock were outstanding as of the end of the period, but were not included
in the computations of diluted earnings per share due to their anti-dilutive
effect.
As of February 2, 2008, we had one
unsecured credit facility, which is renewable annually in August. The facility
allows for borrowings up to $30.0 million at a rate based on prime at our
election or another mutually agreed upon fixed rate at the time of draw. As of
February 2, 2008, we had no borrowings outstanding under this facility. Under
the provisions of this facility, we do not pay commitment fees and are not
subject to covenant requirements. We can draw down on the line of credit when
our main operating account balance falls below $100,000. At the
beginning of Fiscal 2008, we had one operating facility allowing borrowings up
to $15.0 million which we elected to increase to $30.0 million in August
2007. There were 106 days during the fifty-two weeks ended February
2, 2008, where we incurred borrowings against our credit facility for an average
and maximum borrowing of $7.8 million and $18.4 million, respectively, and an
average interest rate of 5.64%. At February 2, 2008, $30.0 million
was available to us from this facility.
Subsequent to February 2, 2008, we
added a new credit facility that allows borrowings up to $50.0
million. The new facility was effective February 4, 2008 and will
expire on December 31, 2008. The facility is unsecured and does not
require a commitment or agency fee, nor are there any covenant
restrictions.
At February 3, 2007, we had one
facility that allowed borrowings up to $15.0 million. There were twenty-four
days during the fifty-three weeks ended February 3, 2007, where we incurred
borrowings against this credit facility for an average and maximum borrowing of
$2.5 million and $5.1 million, respectively, and an average interest rate of
6.12%. At February 3, 2007, $15.0 million was available to us from
this facility.
NOTE
6. PROFIT-SHARING PLAN
We maintain a 401(k) profit-sharing
plan (the Plan) which permits participants to make pre-tax contributions to the
Plan. The Plan covers all employees who have completed one year of service and
who are at least 21 years of age. Participants of the Plan may voluntarily
contribute from 1% to 100% of their compensation subject to certain yearly
dollar limitations as allowed by law. These elective contributions are made
under the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code which allows
deferral of income taxes on the amount contributed to the Plan. The Company’s
contribution to the Plan equals (1) an amount determined at the discretion of
the Board of Directors plus (2) a matching contribution equal to a discretionary
percentage of up to 6% of a participant’s compensation. For each of Fiscal 2008,
Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006, we matched 75% of contributions made to the Plan by
the employees up to 6% of the employee’s compensation.
On November 29, 2007, our Board of
Directors adopted the Hibbett Sports, Inc. Supplemental 401(k) Plan (the
Supplemental Plan) effective February 1, 2008. The primary purpose of
the Supplemental Plan is to supplement the employer matching contribution and
salary deferral opportunity available to highly compensated employees whose
ability to receive Company matching contributions and defer salary under our
existing Plan has been limited because of certain restrictions applicable to
qualified plans. The non-qualified deferred compensation Supplemental
Plan will supplement the existing Plan and allow participants to defer up to 40%
of their compensation and receive an employer matching contribution, subject to
a maximum of 4.5% of compensation. The matching contribution for
Fiscal 2008 was $0.75 for each dollar of compensation deferred.
Contribution expense amounts under the
Plans for Fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $496,000, $520,000 and $491,000,
respectively.
NOTE
7. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company leases one store under a
sublease arrangement from Books-A-Million, Inc., (BAM) of which Clyde B.
Anderson, a director of the Company, is an executive officer, Chairman and
stockholder. This sublease agreement expires in June 2008. Minimum lease
payments were $191,000 in Fiscal 2008, Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2006. Future
minimum lease payments under this non-cancelable sublease aggregate
approximately $80,000. In March 2008, the Board appointed two new
directors who are associated with BAM. Albert C. Johnson is a
Director and stockholder of BAM and Terrance G. Finley is an executive officer
and stockholder of BAM.
NOTE
8. INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate is based on our
income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the
various jurisdictions in which we operate. For interim financial
reporting, we estimate the annual tax rate based on projected taxable income for
the full year and record a quarterly income tax provision in accordance with the
anticipated annual rate. Significant judgment is required in
determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our tax
positions.
A summary of the components of the
provision (benefit) for income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
February
2,
|
|
February
3,
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
18,077 |
|
|
$ |
22,761 |
|
|
$ |
18,800 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(1,518 |
) |
|
|
|
16,779 |
|
|
|
21,992 |
|
|
|
17,282 |
|
State:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,329 |
|
|
$ |
24,541 |
|
|
$ |
19,244 |
|
A
reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate as a percentage of
income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes
follows:
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
February
2,
|
|
February
3,
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Tax
provision computed at the federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.00 |
% |
|
|
35.00 |
% |
|
|
35.00 |
% |
Effect
of state income taxes, net of federal benefits
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
2.65 |
% |
|
|
2.41 |
% |
Other,
net
|
|
|
0.31 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
-1.01 |
% |
|
|
|
37.67 |
% |
|
|
39.19 |
% |
|
|
36.40 |
% |
Deferred income taxes on the balance
sheet result from temporary differences between the amount of assets and
liabilities recognized for financial reporting and tax purposes. The components
of the deferred taxes assets (liabilities) are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
February
2, 2008
|
|
February
3, 2007
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-current
|
|
Current
|
|
Non-current
|
Deferred
rent
|
|
$ |
1,765 |
|
|
$ |
7,257 |
|
|
$ |
1,536 |
|
|
$ |
6,553 |
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,994 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,901 |
) |
Inventory
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
(717 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Accruals
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred
taxes
|
|
$ |
2,725 |
|
|
$ |
3,780 |
|
|
$ |
1,607 |
|
|
$ |
3,217 |
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, we
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the difference between
the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and
liabilities. Deferred tax assets represent items to be used as a tax
deduction or credit in future tax returns for which we have already properly
recorded the tax benefit in the income statement. At least quarterly,
we assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets balance will be
recovered. We take into account such factors as prior earnings
history, expected future earnings, carryback and carryforward periods and tax
strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of a realization of a
deferred tax asset. To the extent recovery is not more likely than
not, a valuation allowance is established against the deferred tax asset,
increasing our income tax expense in the year such determination is
made. We have determined that no such allowance is
required.
Additionally, due to the adoption of
FIN No. 48 (as described in Note 1), we have revised our policy on income taxes
with respect to accounting for uncertain tax positions. We consider
our policy on income taxes to be a critical accounting policy due to the
significant level of estimates, assumptions and judgments and its potential
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We adopted FIN No. 48 effective
February 4, 2007. In accordance with FIN No. 48, we recognize a tax
benefit associated with an uncertain tax position when, in our judgment, it is
more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by a
taxing authority. For a tax position that meets the
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we initially and subsequently
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that we judge to have a greater
than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing
authority. Our liability associated with unrecognized tax benefits is
adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of tax
audits, case law developments and new or emerging legislation. Such
adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are
identified. Our effective tax rate includes the net impact of changes
in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and subsequent adjustments as
considered appropriate by management.
A number of years may elapse before a
particular matter for which we have recorded a liability related to an
unrecognized tax benefit is audited and finally resolved. The number
of years with open tax audits varies by jurisdiction. While it is
often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any
particular tax matter, we believe our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is
adequate. Favorable settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit could
be recognized as a reduction in our effective tax rate in the period of
resolution. Unfavorable settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit
could increase the effective tax rate and may require the use of cash in the
period of resolution. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits is
generally presented as non-current. However, if we anticipate paying
cash within one year to settle an uncertain tax position, the liability is
presented as current.
A reconciliation of the unrecognized
tax benefit under FIN No. 48 during Fiscal 2008 follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
February
2, 2008
|
Unrecognized
tax benefit - February 4, 2007
|
|
$ |
5,117 |
|
Gross
increases - tax positions in prior period
|
|
|
836 |
|
Gross
decreases - tax positions in prior period
|
|
|
(3,259 |
) |
Gross
increases - tax positions in current period
|
|
|
- |
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Lapse
of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Unrecognized
tax benefit - February 2, 2008
|
|
$ |
2,623 |
|
We expect a decrease in our FIN No. 48
liability of approximately $320,000 in the next 12 months due to the expiration
of certain statutes of limitations. We classify interest and
penalties recognized on the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income
tax expense. As of February 2, 2008, we have accrued interest and
penalties in the amount of $345,000.
In the course of an internal review of
prior federal income tax returns, we determined that certain deductions may not
meet all of the requirements for deductibility with respect to performance-based
plans set forth in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. We recorded a balance sheet adjustment in the fourth quarter
of Fiscal 2007, increasing income taxes payable and reducing additional
paid-in-capital by $1.3 million for deductions taken by the Company in Fiscal
2006 and prior years. The related income tax benefit was previously
recorded as an increase in additional paid-in-capital and did not impact prior
years’ results of operations. No adjustments were required to be made
to our consolidated statements of operations. The Fiscal 2007
adjustment is reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
and was not material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations
or cash flows for any previously reported annual or interim
periods.
NOTE
9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We lease the premises for our retail
sporting goods stores under non-cancelable operating leases having initial or
remaining terms of more than one year. The leases typically provide for terms of
five to ten years with options on our part to extend. Many of our leases contain
scheduled increases in annual rent payments and the majority of our leases also
require us to pay maintenance, insurance and real estate taxes. Additionally,
many of the lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent
holidays and/or rent escalation clauses (contingent rentals). For purposes of
recognizing incentives and minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over
the terms of the leases, we use the date of initial possession to begin
amortization, which is generally when we enter the space and begin to make
improvements in preparation of our intended use.
We also lease certain computer
hardware, office equipment and transportation equipment under non-cancelable
operating leases having initial or remaining terms of more than one
year.
In February 1996, we entered into a
sale-leaseback transaction to finance our distribution center and office
facilities. In December 1999, the related operating lease was amended to include
the Fiscal 2000 expansion of these facilities. The amended lease rate is
$877,000 per year and can increase annually with the Consumer Price
Index. This lease will expire in December 2014.
During the fifty-two weeks ended
February 2, 2008, we increased our lease commitments by a net of 75 retail
stores, each having initial lease termination dates between January 2012 and May
2018 as well as various office and transportation equipment. At
February 2, 2008, the future minimum lease payments, excluding maintenance,
insurance and real estate taxes, for our current operating leases and including
the net 75 operating leases added during the fifty-two weeks ended February 2,
2008, were as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal
2009
|
|
$ |
40,332 |
|
Fiscal
2010
|
|
|
35,676 |
|
Fiscal
2011
|
|
|
28,735 |
|
Fiscal
2012
|
|
|
22,635 |
|
Fiscal
2013
|
|
|
17,519 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
32,280 |
|
TOTAL
|
|
$ |
177,177 |
|
Rental expense for all operating leases
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
February
2,
|
|
February
3,
|
|
January
28,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Minimum
rentals
|
|
$ |
32,693 |
|
$ |
30,291 |
|
$ |
27,774 |
|
Contingent
rentals
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
$ |
35,035 |
|
$ |
32,630 |
|
$ |
29,432 |
|
Most of our retail store leases contain
provisions that allow for early termination of the lease by either party if
certain pre-determined annual sales levels are not met. Generally, these
provisions allow the lease to be terminated between the third and fifth year of
the lease. Should the lease be terminated under these provisions, in some cases,
the unamortized portion of any landlord allowances related to that property
would be payable to the landlord.
Legal
Proceedings and other Contingencies
In October 2005, three former employees
filed a lawsuit in Mississippi federal court alleging they are owed back wages
for overtime because they were improperly classified as exempt salaried
employees. They also allege other wage and hour violations. The suit asked the
court to certify the case as a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards
Act on behalf of all similarly situated employees. We dispute the allegations of
wrongdoing in this complaint and have vigorously defended ourselves in this
matter. However, the parties have negotiated a settlement and the court has now
ruled to certify the collective action in accordance with the negotiated
settlement. At February 2, 2008, we began making initial
distributions and estimated that the remaining liability related to this matter
is $755,000. Accordingly, we accrued $755,000 as a current liability
on our consolidated balance sheet. At February 3, 2007, we estimated
that the liability related to this matter was within the range of $750,000 and
$960,000 and accordingly, accrued $750,000 as a current liability on our
consolidated balance sheet. Subsequent to the end of Fiscal 2008, we
completed our obligation under the negotiated settlement related to this
case.
We are also party to other legal
proceedings incidental to our business. We do not believe that any of these
matters will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect
on our business or financial condition. We cannot give assurance, however, that
one or more of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations for the period in which they are resolved. At February 2,
2008, we have estimated that the liability related to these other matters is
approximately $20,000 and accordingly, have accrued $20,000 as a current
liability on our consolidated balance sheet. As of February 3, 2007,
no loss amount was accrued because a loss was not considered probable or
estimable.
The estimates of our liability for
pending and unasserted potential claims does not include litigation
costs. It is our policy to accrue legal fees when it is probable that
we will have to defend against known claims or allegations and we can reasonably
estimate the amount of the anticipated expense. Although we have
accrued legal fees associated with litigation currently pending against us, we
have not made any accruals for potential liability for settlements or judgments
because the potential liability is neither probable nor estimable.
From time to time, we enter into
certain types of agreements that require us to indemnify parties against third
party claims under certain circumstances. Generally these agreements relate to:
(a) agreements with vendors and suppliers under which we may provide customary
indemnification to our vendors and suppliers in respect of actions they take at
our request or otherwise on our behalf; (b) agreements to indemnify vendors
against trademark and copyright infringement claims concerning merchandise
manufactured specifically for or on behalf of the Company; (c) real estate
leases, under which we may agree to indemnify the lessors from claims arising
from our use of the property; and (d) agreements with our directors, officers
and employees, under which we may agree to indemnify such persons for
liabilities arising out of their relationship with us. The Company has director
and officer liability insurance, which, subject to the policy’s conditions,
provides coverage for indemnification amounts payable by us with respect to our
directors and officers up to specified limits and subject to certain
deductibles.
NOTE
10. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following tables set forth certain
unaudited financial data for the quarters indicated (dollar amounts in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended February 2, 2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(13
weeks)
|
|
(13
weeks)
|
|
(13
weeks)
|
|
(13
weeks)
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
133,842 |
|
$ |
114,404 |
|
$ |
129,628 |
|
$ |
142,847 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
45,053 |
|
|
37,476 |
|
|
42,474 |
|
|
43,841 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
16,102 |
|
|
7,797 |
|
|
12,553 |
|
|
11,775 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
10,227 |
|
|
4,681 |
|
|
7,815 |
|
|
7,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended February 3, 2007
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(13
weeks)
|
|
(13
weeks)
|
|
(13
weeks)
|
|
(14
weeks)
|
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
126,914 |
|
$ |
104,363 |
|
$ |
129,658 |
|
$ |
151,159 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
44,140 |
|
|
32,692 |
|
|
43,066 |
|
|
53,233 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
18,125 |
|
|
6,425 |
|
|
15,612 |
|
|
21,576 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
11,523 |
|
|
4,020 |
|
|
9,926 |
|
|
12,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
In the opinion of our management, this
unaudited information has been prepared on the same basis as the audited
information presented elsewhere herein and includes all adjustments necessary to
present fairly the information set forth herein. The operating results from any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any
future period.
The Fiscal 2008 unaudited consolidated
statements of operations for the second quarter presented above includes a $1.2
million pretax benefit related to our accounting for inventory in-transit and
shrinkage results. The total pretax benefit of $1.2 million was
corrected in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2008. We have reviewed this
accounting error utilizing SAB No. 99, “Materiality” and SAB No.
108, “Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements on Current Year Financial Statements,” and believe the
impact of this error is not material to current or prior interim period
consolidated financial statements.
ON
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
Hibbett
Sports, Inc.:
We have
audited and reported separately herein on the financial statements of Hibbett
Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the years ended February 2, 2008 and
February 3, 2007, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended
February 2, 2008.
Our
audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial
statements of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and subsidiaries taken as a
whole. The supplementary information included in Schedule II –
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is presented for purposes of additional
analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such
information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits
of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Birmingham,
Alabama
April 1,
2008
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Balance
at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
Charged
to Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
Write-offs,
net of recoveries
|
|
|
Balance
at End of Period
|
|
Fiscal
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
59,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
(34,000 |
) |
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
(31,000 |
) |
|
$ |
34,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
34,000 |
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
|
$ |
(15,000 |
) |
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
Not applicable.
(a) Conclusion
Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of February 2, 2008.
(b) Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 2,
2008, based on the Internal
Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our evaluation under
the framework in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of February 2,
2008.
(c) Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of Fiscal
2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
None.
The information required is
incorporated by reference from the sections entitled “Directors and Executive
Officers”, “The Board of Directors”, “Code of Ethics”, “Annual Compensation of
Executive Officers” and “Related Person Transactions” in the Proxy Statement for
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held June 2, 2008 (the “Proxy
Statement”), which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The information required is
incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Annual Compensation of
Executive Officers”, “Compensation Committee Report” and
“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy
Statement.
The information required is incorporated by reference from the sections entitled
"Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners”, “Compensation of Non-Employee
Directors”, “Annual Compensation of Executive Officers” and “Directors and
Executive Officers” in the Proxy Statement.
The information required is
incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Related Person
Transactions” and “Governance Information” in the Proxy Statement.
The information required is
incorporated by reference from the section entitled “Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.
(a)
|
Documents
filed as part of this report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
following Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of the Registrant
and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report on such
Financial Statements are incorporated by reference from the Company’s 2008
Annual Report to Stockholders, in Part II, Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
index to the Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required
under the related instructions or are not applicable, and therefore have
been omitted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Exhibits listed below are the exhibits of Hibbett Sports, Inc. and its
wholly owned subsidiaries and are filed as part of, or incorporated by
reference into, this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of
Incorporation and By-Laws
|
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 15, 2007.)
|
|
3.2
|
By-laws
of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the
Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 15, 2007.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material
Contracts
|
|
10.1 |
Adoption
by Board of Directors of Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. of an amendment to
the 2006 Non-Employee Director Equity Plan to change the date of the
director’s annual equity award to coincide with the employee annual equity
award grant date, dated as of February 2, 2007; incorporated by reference
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 7, 2007.
|
|
10.2 |
Agreement
of Merger and Plan of Reorganization that created the successor holding
company Hibbett Sports, Inc. to Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, dated as of February 9, 2007; incorporated by reference as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on February 15, 2007.
|
|
10.3 |
Credit
Agreement between the Company and Regions Bank, dated as of August 29,
2007; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 29,
2007.
|
|
10.4 |
Adoption
by Board of Directors of Hibbett Sports, Inc. of the Supplemental 401(k)
Plan to allow highly compensated employees participation in salary
deferral; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30,
2007.
|
|
10.5 |
Hiring
and compensation arrangements for Nissan Joseph as President and Chief
Operating Officer of Hibbett Sports, Inc.; incorporated by reference to
the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 2, 2008.
|
|
10.6 |
Adoption
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Hibbett Sports,
Inc. of a Change in Control Severance Agreement for specified executives
of the Company; incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 24, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report to
Security Holders
|
|
13.1
|
Fiscal
2008 Annual Report to Stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the
Registrant
|
|
21
|
List
of Company’s Subsidiaries:
1)
Hibbett Sporting Goods, Inc.
2)
Hibbett Team Sales, Inc.
3)
Sports Wholesale, Inc.
4)
Hibbett Capital Management, Inc.
5)
Sports Holding, Inc.
6) Gift Card Services, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consents
of Experts and Counsel |
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed
herewith) |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certifications
|
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed
herewith)
|
57
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed
herewith)
|
58
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed
herewith)
|
59
|
32.2
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed
herewith)
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
HIBBETT
SPORTS, INC.
|
|
|
|
Date: April 2,
2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Gary A. Smith
|
|
|
Gary
A. Smith
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
J. Newsome
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
April 2,
2008
|
Michael J.
Newsome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gary
A. Smith
|
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
Gary A. Smith
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Clyde
B. Anderson
|
Director
|
|
Clyde B. Anderson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terrance
G. Finley
|
Director
|
|
Terrance
G. Finley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Albert
C. Johnson
|
Director
|
|
Albert
C. Johnson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Carl
Kirkland
|
Director
|
|
Carl Kirkland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ralph
T. Parks
|
Director
|
|
Ralph T. Parks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
A. Saunders, III
|
Director
|
|
Thomas A. Saunders,
III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alton
E. Yother
|
Director
|
|
Alton E. Yother
|
|
|
55