form10k.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
R
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
£
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission File Number 001-07395
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
23-1739078
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
201 Alhambra Circle, Coral Gables, Florida
|
|
33134
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (305) 442-7000
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes £ No R
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes £ No R
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes R No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes £ No £
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. R
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer: o
|
Accelerated filer: þ
|
Non-accelerated filer: o
|
Smaller reporting company: o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No R
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $170,329,083 as of June 30, 2010.
As of March 16, 2011, there were 12,900,626 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value, issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III.
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.
2010 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1 .
|
|
|
|
3
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
|
11
|
Item 1B.
|
|
|
|
16
|
Item 2 .
|
|
|
|
17
|
Item 3 .
|
|
|
|
17
|
Item 4 .
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Item 5 .
|
|
|
|
18
|
Item 6 .
|
|
|
|
19
|
Item 7.
|
|
|
|
20
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
|
49
|
Item 8 .
|
|
|
|
50
|
Item 9 .
|
|
|
|
89
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
|
90
|
Item 9B.
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
Item 10 .
|
|
|
|
91
|
Item 11 .
|
|
|
|
91
|
Item 12 .
|
|
|
|
91
|
Item 13 .
|
|
|
|
91
|
Item 14 .
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
Item 15 .
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
General
Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Avatar,” or the “Company” refer to Avatar Holdings Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Dollar amounts specified herein are in thousands, except per share amounts or as otherwise indicated.
PART I
The following business description should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Company Overview
Avatar Holdings Inc. was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1970. Our principal executive offices are located at 201 Alhambra Circle, Coral Gables, Florida 33134 (telephone (305) 442-7000).
We are engaged in the business of real estate operations in Florida and Arizona. Our residential community activities have been adversely affected in both markets, bringing home sales to low levels. We also engage in other real estate activities, such as the operation of amenities, the sale for third-party development of commercial and industrial land and the operation of a title insurance agency, which activities have also been adversely affected by economic conditions.
Our assets consist primarily of real estate in the states of Florida and Arizona. As of December 31, 2010, we own more than 17,000 acres and through partnerships in several limited liability companies (“LLCs”) have a minority ownership interest in an additional 830 acres of developed, partially developed or developable residential, commercial and industrial property. Avatar is required to consolidate these LLCs in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Some portion of these acres may be developed as roads, retention ponds, parks, school sites, community amenities or for other similar uses.
Within Florida and Arizona we also own more than 15,000 acres of preserves, wetlands, open space and other areas that at this time are not developable, permitable and/or economically feasible to develop, but may at some future date have an economic value for preservation or conservation purposes.
We have federally registered trademarks and service marks or pending applications for federal registration for several of our entities, operations and communities, including, but not limited to: Avatar®, Stonegate®, Solivita™, CantaMia™, The Younger Next Year Community™, YNY™, YNY by Avatar™, and two (2) design marks of a reverse clock face.
Business Strategy
Our primary business strategy is the development of active adult communities, and we remain opportunistic about the development of primary residential communities. We believe the demographics are good for active adult development. Solivita and CantaMia, our active adult communities in Central Florida and Goodyear, Arizona, respectively, will initially serve as our flagship communities as we pursue our active adult business strategy. Our business remains capital intensive and requires or may require expenditures for land and infrastructure development, housing construction, funding of operating deficits and working capital, as well as potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets. We continue to carefully manage our inventory levels through monitoring land development and home starts.
Item 1.
|
Business – continued
|
Recent Developments
7.50% Convertible Notes Offering
On January 31, 2011, Avatar and Avatar Properties Inc. (“API”), entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc. (the “Underwriter”). Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, Avatar agreed to issue and sell to the Underwriter, and the Underwriter agreed to purchase for sale in an underwritten public offering, $100,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2016 (the “7.50% Notes”). The 7.50% Notes were sold to the Underwriter at 95.75% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, and were sold to the public at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, plus accrued interest, if any, from February 4, 2011.
On February 4, 2011, Avatar completed the sale of the 7.50% Notes in accordance with the terms of the Underwriting Agreement. The sale of the 7.50% Notes is registered pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-161498), filed by Avatar with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on August 21, 2009 (the “Registration Statement”). Net proceeds to Avatar from the sale of the 7.50% Notes is approximately $95,350 after deducting the Underwriter’s discount of 4.25% and expenses estimated at approximately $400. Avatar intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the 7.50% Notes for general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, the repayment of debt, including Avatar’s 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the “4.50% Notes”), which notes may be put to Avatar pursuant to the terms thereof on each of April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014, and April 1, 2019, or called by Avatar at any time on or after April 5, 2011, and potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets. On February 4, 2011, we purchased $17,765 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes, and as of March 16, 2011, $47,039 principal amount remains outstanding.
Real Estate Operations
We are engaged in real estate operations as summarized below. For further information regarding our financial condition and results of operations please see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Active Adult Community Development
Our primary business strategy being development of active adult communities, we continue to seek and evaluate opportunities to expand our active adult operations.
To further enhance the lifestyle and offer more choices at our active adult communities, we established an exclusive partnership with Younger Next Year authors Chris Crowley and Dr. Henry Lodge, whose New York Times best-selling book is based on a popular approach to living for those over 50. The Younger Next Year (“YNY”) lifestyle is based upon choices in living that will enhance the participants’ quality of life. The four key pillars of this lifestyle are: community, exercise, nutrition, and finance.
Solivita
On February 1, 2011, we initiated our YNY program at Solivita and Solivita West, our Central Florida active adult communities located within the master-planned community of Poinciana. The YNY pillars of community, exercise, nutrition, and finance are reflected in the wealth of activities offered to Solivita residents through the community’s Lifestyles program. Activities and clubs abound at Solivita, ranging from photography to softball to scrap-booking and motorcycle riding. Additionally, we have introduced new exercise equipment and programs, as well as added YNY nutritional choices to our Grille menu.
Solivita and Solivita West incorporate the natural topography of the land, including more than 1,200 acres of wetlands and an oak hammock. These communities currently include more than 148,000 square feet of recreation facilities, as well as two 18-hole golf courses and an active park housing a variety of sporting and games facilities.
Item 1.
|
Business – continued
|
Real Estate Operations – continued
CantaMia
A 1,781-unit active adult community located in the Estrella Mountain Ranch Master Plan Community in Goodyear, Arizona, CantaMia is composed of three phases. On October 25, 2010, we acquired phase 1 consisting of 593 partially or fully developed lots, 29 houses under construction, a recreation center scheduled to open during March 2011 and a fully finished sales center; and an option for phases 2 and 3 consisting of 1,138 undeveloped lots. The option price for phases 2 and 3 approximates $9,600, of which $1,000 was paid during December 2010.
Seasons
On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and partially completed homes, 267 developed lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400 undeveloped master planned lots in an active adult community named Seasons at Tradition located in St. Lucie County, Florida. We are actively marketing the sale of the inventory homes in Seasons, and are evaluating our opportunities regarding the build out of the remainder of the community.
Primary Residential Community Development
We continue to search for primary community development opportunities. We are currently building in our recently acquired primary residential communities in Arizona and are developing new products to be introduced at the Isles of Bellalago in Central Florida. However, due to unfavorable market conditions, we have substantially curtailed our primary residential homebuilding operations in Poinciana, Florida and Rio Rico, Arizona.
Information relating to our backlog is incorporated herein by reference to Item 7 of Part II of this Report under the heading “Results of Operations.”
Poinciana Parkway and Toll Road
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County, Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the "Poinciana Parkway"). The Poinciana Parkway is to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. We will need to permit an interchange between the Poinciana Parkway and U.S. 17/92 in Polk County prior to commencing construction of the road. We have obtained an extension of our South Florida Water Management District permit to February 14, 2018. In July 2008 and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk County. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with Osceola County in December 2010 and the amendment to our agreement with Polk County in October 2010, funding for the Poinciana Parkway is to be obtained by and construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be commenced by February 14, 2012. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with both Counties, construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be completed by May 7, 2014, subject to extension for Force Majeure. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained and construction of the Poinciana Parkway cannot be commenced by February 14, 2012, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or seek specific performance. Polk County’s sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. With respect to Osceola County, if funding and commencement of construction is not met, (i) a portion of Avatar’s land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
Item 1.
|
Business – continued
|
Real Estate Operations – continued
Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain federal and/or state funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including highway tax bill monies, a newly announced federal transportation grant and a federal loan. We cannot predict whether any federal or state funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $47,449 has been expended. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively, associated with the Poinciana Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our review during 2010, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were greater than its carrying value, therefore no impairment losses were recorded during 2010. Non-capitalizable expenditures of $324 and $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2010 and 2009, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,452.
Commercial / Industrial and Other Land Sales
We may generate revenues through the sale of commercial and industrial land for third-party development, primarily in Poinciana, and other non-core residential land.
For further description of the various communities and the operations conducted therein, please see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Real Estate Assets
Our assets consist primarily of real estate in the states of Florida and Arizona. As of December 31, 2010, we own more than 17,000 acres and have a minority ownership interest in an additional 830 acres of developed, partially developed or developable residential, commercial and industrial property. Avatar is required to consolidate these LLCs in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Some portion of these acres may be developed as roads, retention ponds, parks, school sites, community amenities or for other similar uses.
Within Florida and Arizona we also own more than 15,000 acres of preserves, wetlands, open space and other areas that at this time are not developable, permitable and/or economically feasible to develop, but may at some future date have an economic value for preservation or conservation purposes.
Item 1.
|
Business – continued
|
Real Estate Assets - continued
Following is a breakdown of our land holdings (not including our housing inventory) as of December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Planned Lots/Units (1)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
|
Contract Date
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Partially Developed
|
|
|
Raw (2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Osceola County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
$ |
5,206 |
|
1999-2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
45,085 |
|
2003 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
7,880 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
19,307 |
|
2006 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
19,044 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
7,346 |
|
Total Osceola County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
103,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polk County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
20,686 |
|
2003 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
30,274 |
|
2004 |
|
|
2002-2003 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
19,966 |
|
Total Polk County
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
70,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
839 |
|
|
|
16,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Lucie County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hernando County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2005 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collier and Lee County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlands County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Cruz County,(Rio Rico), Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
10,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maricopa, Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
37,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pinal County, Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
5,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pima County, Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
Total Residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,133 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
16,404 |
|
|
|
24,143 |
|
|
$ |
251,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Planned Lots/Units (1)
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
|
Contract Date
|
|
|
Developed
|
|
|
Partially Developed
|
|
|
Raw (2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Consolidated LLCs (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polk County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
1,774 |
|
Martin County, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1981-1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
Total Consolidated LLCs
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
$ |
3,440 |
|
Item 1.
|
Business – continued
|
Real Estate Assets - continued
Acquisition Date
|
|
Contract Date
|
|
Estimated Acres
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
7,257 |
|
2004 (3)
|
|
2004
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
14,804 |
|
2005 (3)
|
|
2004
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
16,004 |
|
Total Florida
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
38,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial/Industrial/Institutional
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
$ |
38,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preserves, wetlands, open space
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-1980
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
3,238 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,857 |
|
Total Other
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
8,095 |
|
|
(1)
|
Estimated planned lots/units are based on historical densities for our land. New projects may ultimately be developed into more or less than the number of lots/units stated.
|
|
(2)
|
We anticipate that with respect to our inventory of undeveloped land, new lots developed over the next several years are likely to be developed at greater density per acre than the density per acre we have undertaken over the past several years. We anticipate evolving market demand for smaller and/or more affordable homes. Accordingly, the number of lots we ultimately develop per acre from our inventory of raw land may exceed the units set forth in this schedule.
|
|
(3)
|
During the 4th quarter 2008, our plans for this property changed from developing it as single family housing to permitting as commercial/industrial/institutional land.
|
|
(4)
|
These landholdings were sold during 2009 to two newly formed LLCs in which we own a minority interest. These LLCs are consolidated for accounting purposes. As a result, the transactions did not qualify as sales for financial reporting purposes.
|
Title Insurance Agency
Prominent Title Insurance Agency, Inc., a subsidiary of Avatar Properties Inc., maintains operations in Poinciana, Florida. Services are offered to purchasers of homes from Avatar as well as unrelated parties. Due to the substantial reduction in real estate transactions, our title insurance agency operations in 2010 experienced a substantial decline in revenues.
Business Segment Information
Our business segment information regarding revenues, results of operations and assets is incorporated herein by reference to Note P to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we employed approximately 243 individuals (almost half of whom are support staff for amenity operations and maintenance) on a full-time or part-time basis. Relations with our employees are satisfactory and there have been no work stoppages.
Item 1.
|
Business – continued
|
Investor Information
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Accordingly, we file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy materials that we have filed with the SEC at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
You can access financial and other information on our website, at www.avatarholdings.com. The information on or accessible through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. We make available, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing such material electronically or otherwise with the SEC. You may download this information from our website or may request us to mail specific information to you. Information regarding equity transactions by our directors, officers and 10% holders may also be obtained on our website.
Regulation
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and regulations that affect every aspect of our business such as environmental, hazardous waste and land use requirements and can result in substantial expense to Avatar.
Homes and residential communities that we build must comply with federal, state and local laws, regulations, and ordinances relating to, among other things, zoning, construction permits or entitlements, construction material requirements, density requirements, and requirements relating to building design and property elevation, building codes and the handling of waste. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent change and often increase construction costs. In some instances, we must comply with laws that require commitments from us to provide roads and other offsite infrastructure to be in place prior to the commencement of new construction. These laws and regulations may result in fees and assessments, including, without limitation, fees and assessments for schools, parks, streets and highways and other public improvements, the costs of which can be substantial.
The residential homebuilding industry is also subject to a variety of federal, state and local statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the protection of human health and the environment. These environmental laws include such areas as storm water and surface water management, soil, groundwater, endangered or imperiled species, natural resources and wetlands protection, and air quality protection and enhancement. Complying with environmental laws for existing conditions may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and may prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in environmentally-sensitive regions or areas.
Competition
Our active adult and primary residential homebuilding, planned community development and other real estate operations are subject to significant competition from distressed sellers. We currently compete with foreclosure sales as well as resales by investors, speculators, foreclosing lenders and residents in our communities. For the sales of new housing units, we compete, as to price and product, with several national and regional homebuilding companies.
Seasonality
Our business is affected to some extent by the seasonality of home sales which are generally higher during the months of November through April in the geographic areas in which we conduct our business.
Warranty
Warranty reserves for houses are established to cover estimated costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims to be incurred subsequent to the closing of a house. Reserves are determined based on historical data and other relevant factors. We may have recourse against subcontractors for claims relating to workmanship and materials.
Item 1.
|
Business – continued
|
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the following list is included as an unnumbered item in Part I of this report in lieu of being included in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 2, 2011.
The following is a list of names and ages of all of the executive officers of Avatar, indicating principal positions and offices with Avatar or a subsidiary held by each such person and each such person's principal occupation(s) or employment during the past five years unless otherwise indicated. Officers of Avatar have been elected to serve until the next annual election of officers (which is expected to occur on June 2, 2011), when they are re-appointed or their successors are elected or until their earlier resignation or removal.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Office and Business Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon M. Donnell
|
|
51
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and President and member of our Board of Directors since November 15, 2010; and holds various positions with subsidiaries; from 2007 to November 2010, Co-Founder and Principal of the Monticello Group, LLC; from 1995 to 2004, various executive positions, including President and Chief Operating Officer and member of the Board of Directors of Dominion Homes, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph Carl Mulac III
|
|
49
|
|
Executive Vice President and President of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc., since October 25, 2010; since April 2009, Chief Executive Officer of Joseph Carl Homes, LLC (n/k/a Avatar Properties of Arizona, LLC); from March 2003 to April 2009, held various officer positions with Tousa, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P. Rama
|
|
44
|
|
Principal Financial Officer since January 1, 2011 and Principal Accounting Officer and Controller since June 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patricia Kimball Fletcher
|
|
53
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel since January 2007; formerly Partner and Chair of Florida Real Estate and Finance Department, Duane Morris LLP, from January 2002 to December 2006; and holds various positions with subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Juanita I. Kerrigan
|
|
64
|
|
Vice President and Secretary since September 1980; and holds various positions with subsidiaries.
|
The above executive officers have held their present positions with Avatar for more than five years, except as otherwise noted. No executive officer of Avatar has any family relationship with any other executive officer or director of Avatar.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects, and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock, may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized officers on our behalf, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend for our forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should note that forward-looking statements in this document speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Although we believe that the expectations, plans, intentions and projections reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The risks, uncertainties and other factors that our stockholders and prospective investors should consider include the following:
Our industry is highly cyclical and is affected by general economic conditions and other factors beyond our control.
The real estate industry is highly cyclical and is affected by changes in national, global and local economic conditions and events, such as employment and income levels, availability of financing, interest rates, consumer confidence and demand. We are subject to various risks, many of which are outside our control, including real estate market conditions (both where our communities and homebuilding operations are located and in areas where potential customers reside), changing demographic conditions, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires, delays in construction schedules, cost overruns, changes in government regulations or requirements, and increases in real estate taxes and other local government fees.
The economic downturn we have been experiencing may continue, has created greater uncertainty in our ability to forecast our business needs, and has adversely affected our business and results of operations.
Since 2008, the market for homes in the geographic areas in which our developments are located have been severely and negatively impacted by the economic downturn. In the geographic areas in which we conduct our real estate operations, there has been a significant increase in the number of homes for sale or available for purchase or rent through foreclosures or otherwise. The price points at which these homes are available have put downward pressure on our margins. We cannot predict when the markets in the geographic areas in which we conduct our real estate operations may demonstrate significant improvements.
The current economic environment has increased our deficit funding obligations for club and homeowner association obligations.
Because we fund homeowners association operating deficits and we operate our club amenities, defaults in payments of club dues and homeowner association assessments by home owners have caused us to expend additional cash to maintain the homeowner association and club operations at their current levels. Further, due to lower than anticipated sales of homes in certain of our master planned communities, our obligations to fund our club and homeowner association operating deficits are greater than projected as there are fewer new home sales in these communities to absorb these obligations.
Further declines in real estate values could result in impairment write-downs.
Further declines in the real estate market could result in future impairments (as defined by FASB authoritative accounting guidance) to certain of our land and other inventories and of our investments in unconsolidated entities. The value of our land and other inventory and land owned by unconsolidated entities depends on market conditions, including estimates of future demand for, and the revenues that can be generated from, such inventory. The downturn in the real estate market has caused the fair value of certain of our inventory to fall below its carrying value. Because of our assessments of fair value, we have written down the carrying value of certain of our inventory, and taken corresponding non-cash charges against our earnings to reflect the impaired value. If the real estate market declines further, we may need to take charges against our earnings for inventory impairments and/or a write-down of our investments in unconsolidated entities and other assets. Any such non-cash charges could have an adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations.
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) – continued
|
We are concentrated geographically, which could adversely affect our business.
Our land and development activities are located in Florida and Arizona, which are among the states most adversely affected by the downturn in the residential real estate market. Development activities depend to a significant degree on the levels of immigration to Florida and Arizona from outside the United States, migration to Florida and Arizona from within the United States and purchases in Florida and Arizona of second and/or vacation homes. Our understanding is that recently there has been substantially less migration into Florida and Arizona from within the United States than there had been in previous years.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under our debt.
Our debt and debt service obligations increased significantly as a result of the issuance of the 7.50% Notes. As of December 31, 2010, total consolidated indebtedness was $77,057, including $64,445 carrying amount of our 4.50% Notes, $12,000 in obligations from the JEN Transaction and borrowings of $612 of secured notes obligations. As of December 31, 2010, as adjusted for the 7.50% Notes and payment of the 4.50% Notes which holders may require us to repurchase as of April 1, 2011, we would have had approximately $112,253 of outstanding unsecured and secured note obligations. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2010, adjusted for the 7.50% Notes and payment of the 4.50% Notes which holders may require us to repurchase as of April 1, 2011, would have been approximately $146,048. This level of debt could affect our future operations, including, among others:
|
·
|
an event of default if we fail to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements, which event of default could result in all of our debt becoming immediately due and payable;
|
|
·
|
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes, and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for these purposes;
|
|
·
|
subjecting us to the risk of increased sensitivity to interest rate increases on our indebtedness with variable interest rates;
|
|
·
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, and increasing our vulnerability to, changes in our business, the industry in which we operate and the general economy; and
|
|
·
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt or are less leveraged.
|
Any of the above-listed factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under the 7.50% Notes, the 4.50% Notes and our other debt.
A higher level of indebtedness increases the risk that we may default on our debt obligations. We cannot assure that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow to pay the interest on our debt or that future working capital, borrowings or equity financing will be available to pay or refinance such debt and to fund potential future acquisitions of real estate and real-estate related assets.
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) - continued
|
Our access to financing may be limited.
Our business is still capital intensive and requires or may require expenditures for land and infrastructure development, housing construction, funding of operating deficits and working capital, as well as potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets.
We anticipate, but cannot assure, that the amounts available from internally generated funds, cash on hand, the sale of non-core assets, and existing and future financing will be sufficient to fund our anticipated operating deficit and our operations, meet debt service and working capital requirements, and provide sufficient liquidity. We may seek additional capital in the form of equity or debt financing from a variety of potential sources, including additional bank financing and future sales of debt or equity securities. However, we cannot assure that such financing will be available or, if available, will be on favorable terms.
Limited credit availability to purchasers of our homes could have a further adverse effect on our business.
A significant majority of the purchasers of our homes finance their purchases through third-party lenders providing mortgage financing or, to some extent, rely upon investment income. In general, housing demand is dependent on home equity, consumer savings and third-party financing and has been adversely affected by less favorable mortgage terms, including requirements for higher deposits and higher credit scores, the tightening of underwriting standards, and declining employment. Certain lenders are imposing more stringent credit requirements.
Our success depends on our key personnel and our ability to retain personnel.
We had recent changes in management personnel, including key members of the management team and the recent employment of key senior management members with many years of active adult development and homebuilding experience. Our business strategy requires, among other things, the retention of experienced management personnel and other employees. The loss of additional experienced management personnel and other employees could adversely affect our operations.
Our joint ventures and equity partnerships may not achieve anticipated results.
We may seek additional joint venture or equity partnership arrangements. A joint venture or equity partnership may involve special risks associated with the possibility that a partner or partnership at any time (i) may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours, (ii) may take actions contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives with respect to our real estate investments or (iii) could experience financial difficulties. Actions by a partner may have the result of subjecting property owned by the joint venture or equity partnership to liabilities in excess of those contemplated by the terms of the joint venture or equity partnership agreement or have other adverse consequences. We cannot assure that any joint venture or equity partnership arrangements will achieve the results anticipated or otherwise prove successful.
Our business is subject to substantial competition.
The active adult and primary residential homebuilding industry is competitive and other national, regional and local home builders compete with us in markets where we are selling homes. Further, our residential homebuilding, planned community development and other real estate operations are subject to significant competition from distressed sellers. We currently compete with foreclosure sales as well as resales by investors, speculators, foreclosing lenders and residents in our communities. For sales of new housing units, we compete, as to price and product, with several national and regional homebuilding companies.
We continue to be opportunistic for potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets as well as to explore the possibility of investment in or acquisitions of various businesses. We compete for opportunities to acquire real estate or real estate-related assets with investors, other residential land developers and home builders, and real estate funds, and there can be no assurance that we will identify and be able to acquire appropriate assets or that any such assets we were to acquire would result in a desirable return on our investment.
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) - continued
|
We are subject to extensive governmental regulation and environmental considerations.
Our business is subject to extensive federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and regulations. The broad discretion that governmental agencies have in administering those requirements and “no growth” or “slow growth” policies, can prevent, delay, make uneconomic or significantly increase the costs of development. Various governmental approvals and permits are required throughout the development process, and no assurance can be given as to the receipt (or timing of receipt) of these approvals or permits. Furthermore, governmental approvals may be affected by changes in the policies of government entities or modifications to policies to address current economic conditions. The incurrence of substantial compliance costs and the imposition of delays and other regulatory burdens could have a material adverse effect on our operations. In addition, various federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous substances located or released on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the hazardous substances. The presence of such hazardous substances at one or more properties, and the requirement to remove or remediate such substances, may result in significant cost.
Further, some laws require us to provide roads and other off-site improvements concurrent with new construction. In some cases, counties and municipalities will also charge us impact or other similar fees and assessments to pay for concurrent infrastructure to serve new development. Development projects may also be subject to assessments for schools, parks, highways and other public improvements, the costs of which can be substantial. These laws are subject to frequent change and frequently result in higher construction costs.
Both Florida and Arizona have laws respecting statutory disclosures and requirements that must be complied with in the marketing and selling of new homes. Other states require us to register our Florida and Arizona projects with such states before we can locally market our homes to residents of such states. There are also Federal laws and regulations that we must comply with in order to allow our home buyers to obtain federally insured mortgages. If certain Federal and state laws are not complied with, home buyers may have a right to cancel their contracts and to a return of their deposit.
Failure to purchase qualified replacement property could result in a reduction in available cash.
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property to defer the entire payment of income taxes. As a result of the property acquisitions during 2009 and 2010, including the JEN Transaction, we believe the properties acquired will satisfy the required replacement property; however, we are uncertain as to the final determination. If it is determined that we have not acquired a sufficient amount of replacement property, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the portion determined not to have been replaced as of December 31, 2010.
We are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims arising in the ordinary course of business, which may lead to additional reserves or expenses.
Despite our commitment to quality, from time to time we discover construction defects in our homes either as a result of our own inspections or in response to customer service requests. To address possible defects that may occur during construction, we set aside a warranty reserve in connection with every home closing. We also maintain general liability insurance and require our subcontractors and professional service providers to maintain insurance coverage and indemnify us for liabilities in connection with their services. Historically, our home warranty reserves have been sufficient to cover all claims for construction defects. Nonetheless, it is possible that our warranty reserves, insurance and/or indemnities will not be adequate to cover all construction defects and home warranty claims for which we may be held liable in the future.
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) - continued
|
Since 2009, we determined that five of our homes, constructed in Central Florida, contained reactive drywall manufactured in China (“Chinese drywall”). The Chinese drywall was provided to our drywall contractor by a secondary supplier of such drywall contractor. We reached a settlement with the secondary supplier who reimbursed Avatar for a substantial portion of the cost to repair the three homes that have been remediated and extends the same financial reimbursement to the remaining two homes containing reactive drywall from such secondary supplier. In Seasons at Tradition we completed construction of the substantially and partially completed homes we acquired, including replacement of Chinese drywall that was placed in such homes during the time they were owned by the original builder. If and to the extent the scope of the Chinese drywall issues prove to be significantly greater than we currently believe, and our existing warranty reserves together with our insurance and any recovery from the secondary supplier is not sufficient to cover claims, losses or other issues related to the reactive drywall, we could incur costs or liabilities related to this issue that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
If we do not secure funding for our Poinciana Parkway project on commercially acceptable terms and commence construction by February 14, 2012, we will be in default under our agreements with Polk and Osceola Counties regarding the Poinciana Parkway, and we may not recover our investment in the Poinciana Parkway, which has already been substantially impaired.
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County, Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the "Poinciana Parkway"). The Poinciana Parkway is to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. We will need to permit an interchange between the Poinciana Parkway and U.S. 17/92 in Polk County prior to commencing construction of the road. We have obtained an extension of our South Florida Water Management District permit to February 14, 2018. In July 2008 and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk County. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with Osceola County in December 2010 and the amendment to our agreement with Polk County in October 2010, funding for the Poinciana Parkway is to be obtained by and construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be commenced by February 14, 2012. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with both Counties, construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be completed by May 7, 2014, subject to extension for Force Majeure. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained and construction of the Poinciana Parkway cannot be commenced by February 14, 2012, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or seek specific performance. Polk County’s sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. With respect to Osceola County, if funding and commencement of construction is not met, (i) a portion of Avatar’s land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $47,449 has been expended. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively, associated with the Poinciana Parkway. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,452. If we cannot obtain funding for construction of the Poinciana Parkway and commence construction by February 14, 2012, or obtain amendments of our agreements with the Counties regarding the Poinciana Parkway, it is unlikely that we will recover our investment in the Poinciana Parkway at any time in the foreseeable future.
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors (dollars in thousands except share and per share data) – continued
|
Our share price could decline if a large number of shares of our common stock or equity-related securities become eligible for future sale.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock or other equity-related securities, as well as issuances of shares of common stock upon conversion of the 7.50% Notes and our 4.50% Notes, could depress the market price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. Any such future sales or issuances could dilute the ownership interests of stockholders, and we cannot predict the effect that future sales or issuances of our common stock or other equity-related securities would have on the market price of our common stock nor can we predict our future needs to fund our operations or balance sheet with future equity issuances.
We have never paid dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock to date, and we intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, the terms of existing or any future debt may preclude us from paying these dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock is likely to be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
Avatar's real estate operations are summarized in “Item 1. Business” above and described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Land developed and in the process of being developed, or held for investment and/or future development, is set forth in Note C of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Our corporate headquarters are located at 201 Alhambra Circle, Coral Gables, Florida, in 16,810 square feet of leased office space. For additional information concerning properties leased by Avatar, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Contractual Obligations” and “Item 8. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”
We are involved in various pending litigation matters primarily arising in the normal course of our business. These cases are in various procedural stages. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined, Avatar believes it is probable in accordance with authoritative accounting standards, that certain claims may result in costs and expenses estimated at approximately $165 and $334 which have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Liabilities or costs arising out of these and other currently pending litigation should not have a material adverse effect on our business or consolidated financial position or results of operations.
We have no tax-related penalties required to be disclosed in this Item 3 pursuant to Section 6707A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
The Common Stock of Avatar Holdings Inc. is traded on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol AVTR. There were 4,137 record holders of Common Stock at February 28, 2011.
High and low sales prices, as reported, for the last two years were:
|
|
Quotations
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
March 31
|
|
$ |
22.05 |
|
|
$ |
16.12 |
|
|
$ |
28.55 |
|
|
$ |
14.49 |
|
June 30
|
|
$ |
24.75 |
|
|
$ |
18.91 |
|
|
$ |
20.17 |
|
|
$ |
15.03 |
|
September 30
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
|
$ |
17.07 |
|
|
$ |
21.45 |
|
|
$ |
17.28 |
|
December 31
|
|
$ |
20.40 |
|
|
$ |
17.42 |
|
|
$ |
18.90 |
|
|
$ |
15.09 |
|
Avatar has not declared any cash dividends on Common Stock since its issuance and has no present intention to pay cash dividends.
For the three months ended December 31, 2010, Avatar did not repurchase any outstanding shares of common stock, which is reflected in the following table:
Period
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average Price Paid Per Share
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan or Program (1)
|
|
|
Maximum Amount That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan or Program (1)
|
|
October 1, 2010 to October 31, 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
18,304 |
|
November 1, 2010 to November 30, 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
18,304 |
|
December 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
18,304 |
|
Total
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
|
On October 13, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $9,864 previously authorized. On October 17, 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. On December 12, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $1,888 remaining after the October 2008 activities. On March 30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038 including accrued interest. On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $5,658 including accrued interest. As of December 31, 2010, the remaining authorization is $18,304.
|
FIVE YEAR COMPARISON OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Dollars in thousands (except share and per share data)
|
|
At or for the Years ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
59,138 |
|
|
$ |
73,501 |
|
|
$ |
110,366 |
|
|
$ |
291,832 |
|
|
$ |
835,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(36,057 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,843 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,341 |
) |
|
$ |
34,053 |
|
|
$ |
256,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
32,465 |
|
|
|
(13,056 |
) |
|
|
(83,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (including net loss attributable to non-controlling interests)
|
|
|
(35,682 |
) |
|
|
(28,983 |
) |
|
|
(109,876 |
) |
|
|
20,997 |
|
|
|
173,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Avatar
|
|
$ |
(35,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,876 |
) |
|
$ |
20,997 |
|
|
$ |
173,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Avatar
|
|
$ |
(3.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
21.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Avatar
|
|
$ |
(3.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.85 |
) |
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
16.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
115,502 |
|
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
175,396 |
|
|
$ |
192,258 |
|
|
$ |
203,760 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
545,451 |
|
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
|
$ |
594,812 |
|
|
$ |
710,144 |
|
|
$ |
752,996 |
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt
|
|
$ |
77,057 |
|
|
$ |
119,002 |
|
|
$ |
131,061 |
|
|
$ |
122,505 |
|
|
$ |
125,632 |
|
Stockholders' equity (1)
|
|
$ |
430,045 |
|
|
$ |
444,101 |
|
|
$ |
429,511 |
|
|
$ |
535,021 |
|
|
$ |
513,543 |
|
Shares outstanding
|
|
|
12,900,626 |
|
|
|
11,355,451 |
|
|
|
8,829,798 |
|
|
|
8,525,412 |
|
|
|
8,193,736 |
|
Stockholders' equity per share
|
|
$ |
33.34 |
|
|
$ |
39.11 |
|
|
$ |
48.64 |
|
|
$ |
62.76 |
|
|
$ |
62.68 |
|
(1 ) For 2010 and 2009, this excludes $444 and $1,018, respectively, for cumulative non-controlling interests, which are classified in consolidated stockholders’ equity in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. These non-controlling interests represent our partners’ equity in LLCs which we consolidate for financial reporting purposes.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data” and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this annual report.
OVERVIEW
We are engaged in the business of real estate operations in Florida and Arizona. Our residential community activities have been adversely affected in both markets, bringing home sales to low levels. We also engage in other real estate activities, such as the operation of amenities, the sale for third-party development of commercial and industrial land and the operation of a title insurance agency, which activities have also been adversely affected by economic conditions.
Our primary business strategy is the development of active adult communities, and we remain opportunistic about the development of primary residential communities. We believe the demographics are good for active adult development. Solivita and CantaMia, our active adult communities in Central Florida and Goodyear, Arizona, respectively, will initially serve as our flagship communities as we pursue our active adult business strategy. Our business remains capital intensive and requires or may require expenditures for land and infrastructure development, housing construction, funding of operating deficits and working capital, as well as potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets. We continue to carefully manage our inventory levels through monitoring land development and home starts.
Our assets consist primarily of real estate in the states of Florida and Arizona. As of December 31, 2010, we own more than 17,000 acres and through partnerships in several limited liability companies (“LLCs”) have a minority ownership interest in an additional 830 acres of developed, partially developed or developable residential, commercial and industrial property. Avatar is required to consolidate these LLCs in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Some portion of these acres may be developed as roads, retention ponds, parks, school sites, community amenities or for other similar uses.
Within Florida and Arizona we also own more than 15,000 acres of preserves, wetlands, open space and other areas that at this time are not developable, permitable and/or economically feasible to develop, but may at some future date have an economic value for preservation or conservation purposes.
JEN Transaction
During October 2010, we acquired from entities affiliated with JEN Partners LLC (“JEN”) a portfolio of real estate assets in Arizona and Florida (the “JEN Transaction”). The purchase price was approximately $62,000, consisting of cash, stock and promissory notes, plus an earn-out of up to $8,000 in common stock. Additionally, we agreed to reimburse development, construction and operating expenditures made by JEN from August 1, 2010 to October 25, 2010 of approximately $3,600.
The assets and properties acquired in the JEN Transaction include:
Arizona Assets:
• CantaMia - a 1,781-unit active adult community located in the Estrella Mountain Ranch Master Plan Community in Goodyear, Arizona. CantaMia is composed of three phases. On October 25, 2010, we acquired phase 1 consisting of 593 partially or fully developed lots, 29 houses under construction, a recreation center scheduled to open during March 2011 and a fully finished sales center; and an option for phases 2 and 3 consisting of 1,138 undeveloped lots. The option price for phases 2 and 3 approximates $9,600, of which $1,000 was paid during December, 2010.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
• Various Arizona Properties - includes 99 fully developed lots, 15 houses completed or under construction and 16 developed lots for which we have an option to acquire.
• Joseph Carl Homes, LLC (now known as Avatar Properties of Arizona, LLC) - a Phoenix-based private home builder and the developer of CantaMia.
Florida Assets:
• Sharpe properties - 445 acres located in Orange County, Florida, comprised of 839 partially developed single-family and townhome lots, a multi-family tract, and a two-acre commercial site.
The purchase price consisted of $33,600 in cash (including the aforementioned $3,600), $19,698 in restricted common stock which resulted in the issuance of 1,050,572 shares subject to a two-year lock up agreement, $12,000 of promissory notes divided equally into two $6,000 notes, one with a one-year maturity and the second with a two-year maturity and contingent consideration of $4,149. At closing, we entered into an earn-out agreement with the seller which provides for the payment of up to $8,000 in common stock (up to 420,168 shares), depending upon the achievement of certain agreed upon metrics related to the CantaMia project by December 31, 2014.
Mr. Joshua Nash, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Mr. Paul Barnett, a member of our Board of Directors, in the aggregate own a 1.5% indirect limited partnership interest in the JEN affiliates from which we purchased the above assets. Neither Mr. Nash nor Mr. Barnett voted on the JEN Transaction.
Recent Developments
7.50% Senior Convertible Notes
On January 31, 2011, Avatar and Avatar Properties Inc. (“API”), entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc. (the “Underwriter”). Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, Avatar agreed to issue and sell to the Underwriter, and the Underwriter agreed to purchase for sale in an underwritten public offering, $100,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2016 (the “7.50% Notes”). The 7.50% Notes were sold to the Underwriter at 95.75% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, and were sold to the public at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, plus accrued interest, if any, from February 4, 2011.
On February 4, 2011, Avatar completed the sale of the 7.50% Notes in accordance with the terms of the Underwriting Agreement. For additional information regarding the 7.50% Notes, see the section titled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
Fiscal Year 2011 Outlook
During 2010, our homebuilding results reflect the difficult conditions in our Florida and Arizona markets characterized by record levels of homes available for sale and diminished buyer confidence. The number of foreclosure sales as well as investor-owned units for sale; the number of foreclosures, pending foreclosures and mortgage defaults; the availability of significant discounts; the difficulty of potential purchasers in selling their existing homes at prices they are willing to accept; the significant amount of standing inventory and competition continue to adversely affect both the number of homes we are able to sell and the prices at which we are able to sell them. In addition, our business is affected to some extent by the seasonality of home sales which are generally higher during the months of November through April in the geographic areas in which we conduct our business. During 2010 and 2009, we recorded impairment charges of $660 and $1,820, respectively, for housing communities relating to homes completed or under construction.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
Our primary business strategy is the development of active adult communities, and we remain opportunistic about the development of primary residential communities. We believe the demographics are good for active adult development. Solivita and CantaMia, our active adult communities in Central Florida and Goodyear, Arizona, respectively, will initially serve as our flagship communities as we pursue our active adult business strategy. We anticipate that we will continue to generate operating losses during 2011. We believe that we have sufficient available cash to fund these losses for 2011.
We have taken steps to decrease operating expenses including the consolidation of field operations and a reduction of staff. Since December 31, 2005, we reduced our headcount by approximately 60% to 243 full-time and part-time employees (almost half of whom are support staff for amenity operations and maintenance) from 585 full-time and part-time employees.
We continue to manage Avatar and its assets for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. We remain focused on maintaining sufficient liquidity. We continue to carefully manage our inventory levels through monitoring land development and home starts. Our strategy also includes the monetization of commercial and industrial land and other assets, and the possible sale of certain non-core and other residential land to bring forward future cash flows that would otherwise constitute long-term developments.
Residential Real Estate
Revenues and sales data derived from primary and active adult homebuilding operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized under “Results of Operations.”
Residential Community Development
Active Adult Communities
Our primary business strategy being development of active adult communities, we continue to seek and evaluate opportunities to expand our active adult operations.
To further enhance the lifestyle and offer more choices at our active adult communities, we established an exclusive partnership with Younger Next Year authors Chris Crowley and Dr. Henry Lodge, whose New York Times best-selling book is based on a popular approach to living for those over 50. The Younger Next Year (“YNY”) lifestyle is based upon choices in living that will enhance the participants’ quality of life. The four key pillars of this lifestyle are: community, exercise, nutrition, and finance.
Solivita
On February 1, 2011, we initiated our YNY program at Solivita and Solivita West; our Central Florida active adult communities located within the master-planned community of Poinciana. The YNY pillars of community, exercise, nutrition, and finance are reflected in the wealth of activities offered to Solivita residents through the community’s Lifestyles program. At Solivita and Solivita West, we have developed more than 148,000 square feet of recreation facilities. These facilities include a fitness center, a golf clubhouse, restaurants, arts and crafts rooms, a café, other meeting and ballroom facilities, and two 18-hole golf courses. The community’s active park houses a variety of sporting and games facilities, including an official softball field, half-court basketball court, pickleball courts and tennis courts. Activities and clubs abound at Solivita, ranging from photography to softball to scrap-booking and motorcycle riding. Additionally, we have introduced new exercise equipment and programs, as well as added YNY nutritional choices to our Grille menu.
Solivita opened during 2000. During 2004, we commenced the development of an expansion of Solivita, Solivita West, on 907 acres of land in Poinciana acquired in 2003. Sales of single-family units commenced during the first quarter of 2005 and closings commenced during 2006.
From inception, we have closed 3,434 homes in Solivita and Solivita West, and approximately 6,000 individuals resided in the communities as of December 31, 2010.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
During 2010, we signed 45 contracts, net of cancellations, at Solivita and Solivita West, with net sales value of approximately $11,674 (see “Results of Operations”).
CantaMia
A 1,781-unit active adult community located in the Estrella Mountain Ranch Master Plan Community in Goodyear, Arizona, CantaMia is composed of three phases. On October 25, 2010, we acquired phase 1 consisting of 593 partially or fully developed lots, 29 houses under construction, a recreation center scheduled to open during March 2011 and a fully finished sales center; and an option for phases 2 and 3 consisting of 1,138 undeveloped lots. The option price for phases 2 and 3 approximates $9,600, of which $1,000 was paid during December 2010.
Seasons
On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and partially completed homes, 267 developed lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400 undeveloped master planned lots in an active adult community named Seasons at Tradition located in St. Lucie County, Florida. We are actively marketing the sale of the inventory homes in Seasons, and are evaluating our opportunities regarding the build out of the remainder of the community.
Primary Residential Development
We continue to search for primary community development opportunities. We are currently building in our recently acquired primary residential communities in Arizona and are developing new products to be introduced at the Isles of Bellalago in Central Florida. However, due to unfavorable market conditions, we have substantially curtailed our primary residential homebuilding operations in Poinciana, Florida, and Rio Rico, Arizona.
Poinciana Parkway and Toll Road
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County, Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the "Poinciana Parkway"). The Poinciana Parkway is to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. We will need to permit an interchange between the Poinciana Parkway and U.S. 17/92 in Polk County prior to commencing construction of the road. We have obtained an extension of our South Florida Water Management District permit to February 14, 2018. In July 2008 and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk County. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with Osceola County in December 2010 and the amendment to our agreement with Polk County in October 2010, funding for the Poinciana Parkway is to be obtained by and construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be commenced by February 14, 2012. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with both Counties, construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be completed by May 7, 2014, subject to extension for Force Majeure. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained and construction of the Poinciana Parkway cannot be commenced by February 14, 2012, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or seek specific performance. Polk County’s sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. With respect to Osceola County, if funding and commencement of construction is not met, (i) a portion of Avatar’s land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain federal and/or state funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including highway tax bill monies, a newly announced federal transportation grant and a federal loan. We cannot predict whether any federal or state funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $47,449 has been expended. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively, associated with the Poinciana Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our review during 2010, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were greater than its carrying value, therefore no impairment losses were recorded during 2010. Non-capitalizable expenditures of $324 and $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2010 and 2009, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,452.
Commercial / Industrial and Other Land Sales
We also generate revenues through the sale of commercial and industrial land for third-party development, primarily in Poinciana, and other non-core residential land. Revenues from commercial and industrial and other non-core residential land sales vary from year to year depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and timing of closings.
Other Operations
We also generate revenues through rental and other operations, including a small community shopping center in Rio Rico, recreational facilities and title insurance agency operations.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
In the preparation of our financial statements, we apply accounting principles accepted in the United States (GAAP). The application of GAAP may require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying results.
Revenue Recognition
As discussed in Note A to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360, revenues from the sales of housing units are recognized when the sales are closed and title passes to the purchasers. In addition, revenues from commercial, industrial and other land sales are recognized in full at closing, provided the purchaser's initial and continuing investment is adequate, all financing is considered collectible and there is no significant continuing involvement. As a result, our revenue recognition process does not involve significant judgments or estimations.
Impairments of Long-Lived Assets
Each reporting period, we review our long-lived assets for indicators of impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360-10”). Long-lived assets that we evaluate are our Land and Other Inventories, Property and Equipment and the Poinciana Parkway. The following is a discussion of each of these types of long-lived assets:
Impairments of Land and Other Inventories
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include our: (i) housing communities (active adult and primary residential, including scattered lots) and (ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. In accordance with ASC 360-10, Land and Other Inventories are stated at cost unless the asset is determined to be impaired, in which case the asset would be written down to its fair value. Land and Other Inventories include expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated costs. Land and Other Inventories owned and constructed by us also include interest cost capitalized until development and construction are substantially completed. Land and development costs, construction and direct and allocated costs are assigned to components of Land and Other Inventories based on specific identification or other allocation methods based upon United States generally accepted accounting principles.
For assets held and used, if indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Generally, fair value is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the inherent risks associated with the asset and related estimated cash flow streams. Assumptions and estimates used in the determination of the estimated future cash flows are based on expectations of future operations and economic conditions and certain factors described below. Changes to these assumptions could significantly affect the estimates of future cash flows which could affect the potential for future impairments. Due to the uncertainties of the estimation process, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.
For assets held for sale (such as completed speculative housing inventory), we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value (estimated sales prices) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less cost to sell is less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value less cost to sell.
We evaluate our Land and Other Inventories for impairment on a quarterly basis. During 2010, our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of $660 which related to homes completed or under construction. Our evaluation of land developed and/or held for future development or sale did not result in impairment charges during 2010. As of December 31, 2010, other than the Land and Other Inventories that we determined to be impaired and accordingly wrote down to their carrying value, we had no long-lived assets that had undiscounted cash flows within 25% of their carrying values.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES – continued
The impairment charges for the years ended 2010, 2009, and 2008 reflect market conditions, including a significant oversupply of homes available for sale, higher foreclosure activity and significant competition. During 2010, we recorded impairment charges of $660 relating to homes completed or under construction. The following significant trends were utilized in the evaluation of our land and other inventories for impairment:
Active Adult Communities
The average price on sales closed from active adult homebuilding operations during 2010 was $195 compared to $242 during 2009. Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during 2010 was $197 compared to $211 during 2009. The decreases in average sales prices for sales and closings were due to the lower sales prices at Seasons at Tradition compared to Solivita. Additionally, the average contribution margin on closings from active adult homebuilding operations was approximately 28% during 2010 compared to approximately 16% during 2009. The increase in average contribution margins on closings from active adult homebuilding operations is attributable to the closings at Seasons at Tradition which generated higher margins as a result of our acquisition price. During 2010, at Seasons at Tradition, we had 72 closings with an aggregate dollar value of approximately $10,981. As of December 31, 2010, we have 16 completed homes remaining in inventory at Seasons at Tradition.
Primary Residential Communities
The average price on sales closed from primary residential homebuilding operations during 2010 was $219 compared to $166 during 2009. Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during 2010 was $241 compared to $157 during 2009. The increases in average sales price were due to changes in mix between our lower and higher price communities. The average contribution margin on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations was approximately (1%) during 2010 compared to approximately 6% during 2009.
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include our: (i) housing communities (active adult and primary residential, including scattered lots) and (ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. A discussion of the factors that impact our impairment assessment for these categories follows:
Housing communities: Activities include the development of active adult and primary residential communities and the operation of amenities. The operating results and losses generated from active adult and primary residential communities during 2010 and 2009 include operating expenses relating to the operation of the amenities in our communities as well as divisional overhead allocated among several communities.
Our active adult and primary residential communities are generally large master-planned communities in Florida and in Arizona. Several of these communities are long term projects on land we have owned for many years. In reviewing each of our communities, we determine if potential impairment indicators exist by reviewing actual contribution margins on homes closed in recent months, projected contribution margins on homes in backlog, projected contribution margins on speculative homes, average selling prices, sales activities and local market conditions. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated cost of home construction, estimated land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas in which we build and sell homes, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. Build-out of our active adult and primary residential communities generally exceeds five years. Our current assumptions are based on current activity and recent trends at our active adult and primary residential communities. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial number of variables to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future impairments.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES – continued
Declines in contribution margins below those realized from our current sales prices and estimations could result in future impairment losses in one or more of our housing communities.
Land developed and/or held for future development or sale: Our land developed and/or held for future development or sale represents land holdings for the potential development of future active adult and/or primary residential communities. For land developed and/or held for future development or sale, indicators of potential impairment include changes in use, changes in local market conditions, declines in the selling prices of similar assets and increases in costs. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated costs of home construction, estimated land and land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas where we own land for future development, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. Factors that we consider in determining the appropriateness of moving forward with land development or whether to write-off the related amounts capitalized include: our current inventory levels, local market economic conditions, availability of adequate resources and the estimated future net cash flows to be generated from the project. Except for those primary residential communities recently acquired in the JEN Transaction, build-out of our land held for future development generally exceeds five years. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial number of variables to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future impairments.
Declines in market values below those realized from our current sales prices and estimations could result in future impairment.
Impairments of Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment are stated at cost and depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: land improvements 10 to 25 years; buildings and improvements 8 to 39 years; and machinery, equipment and fixtures 3 to 7 years. Maintenance and operating expenses of equipment utilized in the development of land are capitalized as land inventory cost. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Property and Equipment includes the cost of amenities owned by us. The cost of amenities includes expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated costs. Property and Equipment owned and constructed by us also includes interest cost incurred during development and construction.
Each reporting period, we review our Property and Equipment for indicators of impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10. For our amenities, which are located within our housing communities, indicators of potential impairment are similar to those of our housing communities (described above) as these factors may impact our ability to generate revenues at our amenities or cause construction costs to increase. In addition, we factor in the collectibility and potential delinquency of the fees due for our amenities.
Impairments of Poinciana Parkway
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County, Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the "Poinciana Parkway"). The Poinciana Parkway is to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. We will need to permit an interchange between the Poinciana Parkway and U.S. 17/92 in Polk County prior to commencing construction of the road. We have obtained an extension of our South Florida Water Management District permit to February 14, 2018. In July 2008 and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk County. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with Osceola County in December 2010 and the amendment to our agreement with Polk County in October 2010, funding for the Poinciana Parkway is to be obtained by and construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be commenced by February 14, 2012. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with both Counties, construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be completed by May 7, 2014, subject to extension for Force Majeure. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES – continued
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained and construction of the Poinciana Parkway cannot be commenced by February 14, 2012, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or seek specific performance. Polk County’s sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. With respect to Osceola County, if funding and commencement of construction is not met, (i) a portion of Avatar’s land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain federal and/or state funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including highway tax bill monies, a newly announced federal transportation grant and a federal loan. We cannot predict whether any federal or state funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $47,449 has been expended. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively, associated with the Poinciana Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our review during 2010, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were greater than its carrying value, therefore no impairment losses were recorded during 2010. Non-capitalizable expenditures of $324 and $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2010 and 2009, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,452.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets are significant components of our consolidated balance sheets. Our policies regarding the valuation of intangible assets affect the amount of future amortization and possible impairment charges we may incur. Assumptions and estimates about future values of our intangible and other long-lived assets are complex and subjective. They can be affected by a variety of factors, including external factors such as consumer spending habits and general economic trends, and internal factors such as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts.
In accordance with ASC 350, we review the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets of each of our reporting units on an annual basis as of December 31, or more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances, based on a two-step impairment test. We consider our Active Adult Communities segment to be individual reporting unit which is also an individual operating segment. Goodwill acquired in business combinations is assigned to the reporting unit expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination as of the acquisition date. We concluded the business combination from the JEN Transaction benefited our active adult communities reporting segment. The first step of the impairment test compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill. The fair value of each reporting unit is calculated using the average of an income approach and a market comparison approach which utilizes similar companies as the basis for the valuation. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. The impairment loss is determined by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying value of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over amounts assigned to its net assets.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES – continued
The determination of fair value utilizes an evaluation of historical and forecasted operating results and other estimates. Fair value measurements are generally determined through the use of valuation techniques that may include a discounted cash flow approach, which reflects our own assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
During the year, we monitor the actual performance of our reporting units relative to the fair value assumptions used in our annual goodwill impairment test, including potential events and changes in circumstance affecting our key estimates and assumptions.
On October 25, 2010, we recorded goodwill of $17,215 as a result of the JEN Transaction which was allocated to our active adult reporting segment. As a result of our annual impairment goodwill test we did not record any impairment losses as of December 31, 2010.
Variable Interest Entities
GAAP requires a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to be consolidated with a company which is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Entities determined to be VIEs, for which we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method.
Avatar’s variable interest in VIEs may be in the form of (1) equity ownership, (2) contracts to purchase assets and/or (3) loans provided by Avatar to a VIE. We examine specific criteria and use judgment when determining if Avatar is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions, level of economic disproportionality between Avatar and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest. These entities are VIEs and our investments in these entities, along with other arrangements represent variable interests, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We analyze these entities when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event.
Income Taxes
Income taxes have been provided using the liability method under ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes where deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code to extend the permitted carryback period for offsetting certain net operating losses (NOLs) against earnings for up to five years. Due to this enacted federal tax legislation, Avatar carried back its 2009 NOL against earnings it generated in the five previous years. As a result, Avatar received a federal tax refund of $33,627 during 2010.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES – continued
In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During 2010 we recognized an increase of $12,103 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2010, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $22,522. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property to defer the entire payment of income taxes. As a result of the property acquisitions during 2009 and 2010, including the JEN Transaction, we believe the properties acquired will satisfy the required replacement property; however, we are uncertain as to the final determination. If it is determined that we have not acquired a sufficient amount of replacement property, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the portion determined not to have been replaced as of December 31, 2010.
Warranty Reserves
Warranty reserves for houses are established to cover estimated costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims to be incurred subsequent to the closing of a house. Reserves are determined based on historical data and other relevant factors. We may have recourse against subcontractors for claims relating to workmanship and materials. Actual future warranty costs could differ from our currently estimated amounts.
Construction Reserves
Construction reserves for closed houses are established to cover potential costs for completion of houses closed. These reserves are determined on a per house basis based on estimated house budgets and other relevant factors. Actual construction costs could differ from our currently estimated amounts.
Estimated Development Liability
The estimated development liability consists primarily of utilities improvements in Poinciana and Rio Rico for more than 8,000 homesites previously sold. The estimated development liability for sold land is reduced by actual expenditures and is evaluated and adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect management’s estimate of anticipated costs. In addition, we obtain third-party engineer evaluations and adjust this liability to reflect changes in the estimated costs. We recorded charges of approximately $291, $592 and $710 during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, associated with these obligations. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction material and labor, as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs, may have a significant effect on the estimated development liability.
Share-Based Compensation
The Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as amended, (the “Incentive Plan”) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to officers, employees and directors of Avatar. The exercise prices of stock options may not be less than the stock exchange closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan generally expire 10 years after the date of grant.
The calculation of the fair values of our stock-based compensation plans requires estimates that require management’s judgments. Under ASC 718, the fair value of awards of restricted stock and units which do not contain a specified hurdle price condition is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Under ASC 718, the fair value of restricted stock awards which contain a specified hurdle price condition is estimated on the grant date using the Monte-Carlo option valuation model (like a lattice model). Under ASC 718, the fair value of each stock option is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The valuation models require assumptions and estimates to determine expected volatility, expected life, expected dividends and expected risk-free interest rates. The expected volatility was determined using historical volatility of our stock based on the contractual life of the award. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury strips at the award grant date. We also used historical data to estimate forfeiture experience.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES – continued
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC Subtopic 470-20, Debt with Conversion Options – Cash Conversion (“ASC 470-20”). This guidance applies to convertible debt instruments that, by their stated terms, may be settled in cash (or other assets) upon conversion, including partial cash settlement of the conversion option. This guidance requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash on conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. ASC 470-20 requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity. In addition, transaction costs incurred directly related to the issuance of convertible debt instruments are allocated to the liability and equity components in proportion to the allocation of proceeds and accounted for as debt issuance costs and equity issuance costs, respectively. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount and the debt issuance costs are amortized to interest cost using the interest method over the expected life of a similar liability that does not have an associated equity component. The equity component is not subsequently re-valued as long as it continues to qualify for equity treatment. This guidance must be applied retrospectively to previously issued convertible instruments that may be settled in cash, as well as prospectively to newly issued instruments. We adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2009.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810. This guidance requires an enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. ASC 810 requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810 is effective for all variable interest entities and relationships with variable interest entities existing as of January 1, 2010. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2010, which did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, "Technical Corrections to Various Topics" ("ASU 2010-08"). ASU 2010-08 is the result of the FASB's review of its standards to determine if any provisions are outdated, contain inconsistencies, or need clarifications to reflect the FASB's original intent. The FASB believes the related changes to GAAP are generally nonsubstantive in nature and will not result in pervasive changes to current practice. However, the FASB notes it is possible that the application of the guidance may result in a change to existing practice. ASU 2010-08 provides certain clarifications on embedded derivatives and hedging within ASC Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" ("ASC 815"), which caused a change in the application of that standard with respect to certain embedded derivatives. The clarifications of ASC 815 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to existing contracts (hybrid instruments) containing embedded derivative features at the date of adoption. All other amendments are effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after the date this ASU was issued. The adoption of this accounting update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or related disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, "Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements," (amendments to ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures") which requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. ASU 2010-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or related disclosures.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations," (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) which specifies that in making the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations, the comparative financial statements presented by public entities should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro-forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro-forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro-forma revenue and earnings. The amended disclosure requirements are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010, which is January 1, 2011 for us. As the impact of the amendments is to amend the disclosure for business combinations, the adoption of ASU No. 2010-29 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, "Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts," (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) which modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, consideration should be given to whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples in paragraph 350-20-35-30, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, which is January 1, 2011 for us. Upon adoption of the amendments, assessment should be made of the reporting units with carrying amounts that are zero or negative to determine whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units' goodwill is impaired. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units is impaired, the Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test should be performed for those reporting unit(s). Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings as required by Section 350-20-35. We do not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2010-28 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the preparation of our financial statements, we apply United States generally accepted accounting principles. The application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles may require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying results.
The following table provides a comparison of certain financial data related to our operations:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
36,949 |
|
|
$ |
32,604 |
|
|
$ |
42,491 |
|
Expenses (1)
|
|
|
41,992 |
|
|
|
38,217 |
|
|
|
49,216 |
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
(5,613 |
) |
|
|
(6,725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
26,968 |
|
|
|
38,217 |
|
Expenses (2)
|
|
|
20,493 |
|
|
|
35,071 |
|
|
|
81,350 |
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
(6,284 |
) |
|
|
(8,103 |
) |
|
|
(43,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
20,165 |
|
Expenses
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
9,141 |
|
|
|
30,319 |
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(10,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
Expenses
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(7,223 |
) |
|
|
(13,821 |
) |
|
|
(60,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated income (expenses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
Gain on repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(7,812 |
) |
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(20,508 |
) |
|
|
(19,694 |
) |
|
|
(22,388 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
(5,531 |
) |
|
|
(6,857 |
) |
|
|
(4,282 |
) |
Other real estate expenses, net
|
|
|
(3,099 |
) |
|
|
(3,688 |
) |
|
|
(8,424 |
) |
Impairment of the Poinciana Parkway
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,108 |
) |
|
|
(30,228 |
) |
Impairment of land developed or held for future development
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11,919 |
) |
|
|
(16,941 |
) |
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(36,057 |
) |
|
|
(61,843 |
) |
|
|
(142,341 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
32,465 |
|
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss attributable to Avatar
|
|
$ |
(35,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,876 |
) |
|
(1)
|
Includes impairment charges for inventory of approximately $408, $371 and $625 for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $1,685 for goodwill for 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes impairment charges of approximately $252, $1,449 and $34,332 for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
Data from closings for the active adult and primary residential homebuilding segments for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is summarized as follows:
Years ended December 31,
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Average Price Per Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
$ |
25,527 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
11,582 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
Total
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
$ |
37,109 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
$ |
21,041 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
23,786 |
|
|
$ |
166 |
|
Total
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
$ |
44,827 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
$ |
30,257 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
35,803 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
Total
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
$ |
66,060 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
Data from contracts signed for the active adult and primary residential homebuilding segments for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is summarized as follows:
Years ended December 31,
|
|
Gross Number of Contracts Signed
|
|
|
Cancellations
|
|
|
Contracts Signed, Net of Cancellations
|
|
|
Dollar Value
|
|
|
Average Price Per Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
$ |
24,427 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
10,616 |
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
Total
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
168 |
|
|
$ |
35,043 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
11,810 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
22,408 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
Total
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
$ |
34,218 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
$ |
17,665 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
19,343 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
Total
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
|
$ |
37,008 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
Backlog acquired from the JEN Transaction for active adult and primary residential homebuilding segments on October 25, 2010 (acquisition date) is summarized as follows:
As of October 25,
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
|
Dollar Volume
|
|
|
Average Price Per Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult community
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
6,147 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
Total
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
8,006 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
Backlog, including for 2010 backlog related to the JEN Transaction, for the active adult and primary residential homebuilding segments as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is summarized as follows:
As of December 31,
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
|
Dollar Volume
|
|
|
Average Price Per Unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
7,294 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
$ |
274 |
|
Total
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
$ |
11,409 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
Total
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
$ |
5,469 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
$ |
11,477 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
Total
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
16,079 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
The number of net housing contracts signed during the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 decreased 16%. The dollar value of housing contracts signed increased 2% which includes 75 sales contracts representing an aggregate dollar value of approximately $11,720 in Seasons at Tradition and 14 sales contracts representing an aggregate dollar value of approximately $2,872 in the communities we acquired in the JEN Transaction. The low volume of housing contracts signed for 2010 continues to reflect the weak market for new residences in the geographic areas where our communities are located. Our communities are located in areas of Florida and Arizona where there is an excess of units for sale, including foreclosures and houses being sold by lenders, and continued use of various sales incentives by residential builders in our markets, including Avatar. During the year ended December 31, 2010, cancellations of previously signed contracts totaled 32 compared to 41 during the year ended December 31, 2009. As a percentage of the gross number of contracts signed, this represents 16% and 17%, respectively.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
As of December 31, 2010, our inventory of unsold (speculative) homes, both completed and under construction, was 83 units compared to 144 units as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2010, approximately 65% of unsold homes were completed compared to approximately 83% as of December 31, 2009.
During the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009, the number of homes closed decreased by 20% and the related revenues decreased by 17%. Our average sales price for homes closed during the year ended December 31, 2010 increased to $202 compared to $195 for the year ended December 31, 2009. We anticipate that we will close in excess of 80% of the homes in backlog as of December 31, 2010 during the subsequent 12-month period, subject to cancellations by purchasers prior to scheduled delivery dates. We do not anticipate a meaningful improvement in our markets in the near term. During the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, the number of homes closed decreased by 6.9% and the related revenues decreased by 32.1%.
In general, prices of homes sold during 2010 ranged from approximately $105 to approximately $500 in our primary residential operations. At Solivita and Solivita West, prices ranged from approximately $145 to approximately $461 on homes sold during 2010. At CantaMia, prices ranged from approximately $147 to approximately $364 on homes sold during 2010. Closings on to-be-built homes generally occur within 180 to 210 days from sale. Closings on speculative homes generally occur within 30 to 60 days from sale.
Fiscal Year 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year 2009
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 was ($35,108) or ($3.07) per basic and diluted share compared to net loss of ($28,983) or ($3.11) per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily due to decreased income tax benefit recognized as well as increased general and administrative expenses. Partially offsetting the increase in net loss for 2010 compared to 2009 was decreased losses in our active adult and primary residential communities operations substantially related to profits realized from closings at Seasons at Tradition, increased pre-tax profits from sales of commercial and industrial sales and decrease in interest expense.
Revenues from active adult operations increased $4,345 or 13.3% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Expenses from active adult operations increased $3,775 or 9.9% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase in revenues for fiscal year 2010 is primarily attributable to the commencement of closings during 2010 at Seasons at Tradition and closings from CantaMia which we acquired on October 25, 2010. The increase in expenses is attributable to higher volume of house closings. The average sales price on closings from active adult homebuilding operations during 2010 was $195 compared to $242 during 2009. The average contribution margin (excluding impairment charges) on closings from active adult homebuilding operations during 2010 was approximately 28% compared to approximately 16% during 2009. The increase in average contribution margins is attributable to the closings from Seasons at Tradition as a result of our acquisition price. During 2010, at Seasons at Tradition and CantaMia, we had 72 and 14 closings, respectively, with an aggregate dollar value of approximately $10,981 and $2,872, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, we have 16 completed homes remaining in inventory at Seasons at Tradition. Included in the results from active adult operations are divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations. We have been experiencing increased defaults in payments of club dues for our amenities compared to previous years.
Revenues from primary residential operations decreased $12,759 or 47.3% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Expenses from primary residential operations decreased $14,578 or 41.6% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The decrease in revenues is primarily attributable to decreased closings and average sales prices. The decrease in expenses is attributable to lower volume of closings. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded impairment charges in our primary residential operations of approximately $252 compared to approximately $1,449 for the year ended December 31, 2009 from homes completed or under construction. The average sales price on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for 2010 was $219 compared to $166 for 2009. The average contribution margin (excluding impairment charges) on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for 2010 was approximately 1% compared to approximately 6% for 2009. Included in the results from primary residential operations are divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations. We have been experiencing increased defaults in payments of club dues for our amenities compared to previous years.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
The amount and types of commercial and industrial and other non-core residential land sold vary from year to year depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and the timing of the closings of these sales. Revenues from commercial and industrial and other land sales decreased $4,113 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we realized pre-tax profits of $3,717 on revenues of $4,712 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we realized pre-tax profits of $316 on revenues of $8,825 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. Expenses from commercial, industrial and other land sales decreased $8,146 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in expenses is attributable to lower volume of closings of commercial and industrial and other non-core residential land sales.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of $13,739, which included $1,820 related to homes completed or under construction and $11,919 related to LLCs, which are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
Revenues from other operations increased $490 or 49.2% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. Expenses from other operations increased $586 or 74.7% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The increases in revenues and expenses are primarily attributable to increased volume of real estate transactions from resale operations in Solivita.
Interest income decreased $67 or 10.2% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributable to decreased interest rates earned and lower cash balances on our cash and cash equivalents during 2010 as compared to 2009.
During 2009, we repurchased $14,076 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $11,696 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $1,783 (which is included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009).
General and administrative expenses increased $814 or 4.1% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase is primarily due to an increase in professional fees as a result of legal and accounting expenses incurred of approximately $1,800 for the JEN Transaction and increases in compensation expense as a result of approximately $1,400 of severance compensation due under contract with our former chief executive officer who retired on November 15, 2010.
Interest expense decreased $1,326 or 19.3% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to the decrease in outstanding indebtedness during 2010 compared to 2009 as a result of our repurchase of 4.50% Notes and repayment of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
Other real estate expenses, net, represented by real estate taxes, property maintenance and miscellaneous income not allocable to specific operations, decreased by $589 or 16.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The decreases are primarily attributable to reductions in real estate taxes and property maintenance costs as well as an increase in miscellaneous income. These decreases were partially mitigated by an increase in charges related to the required utilities improvements of more than 8,000 residential homesites in Poinciana and Rio Rico substantially sold prior to the termination of the retail homesite sales programs in 1996. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized charges of $291 compared to $592 during the year ended December 31, 2009. These charges were based on third-party engineering evaluations. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction, material and labor as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs may have a significant effect on the estimated development liability. Also included in other real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 are non-capitalizable expenditures of $324 compared to $341 for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to the Poinciana Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our review during 2010, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were greater than its carrying value, therefore no impairment losses were recorded during 2010. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108.
Income tax benefit was provided for at an effective tax rate of 1.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 53.1% for the year ended December 31, 2009. In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized an increase of $12,103 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2010, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $22,522. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized. Reference is made to the Income Taxes note to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report.
Fiscal Year 2009 Compared to Fiscal Year 2008
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was ($28,983) or ($3.11) per basic and diluted share compared to net loss of ($109,876) or ($12.85) per basic and diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a decline in the impairment charges recognized during 2009 as compared to 2008 partially mitigated by increased pre-tax losses from active adult operating results, increased interest expense and decreases in pre-tax profits from commercial and industrial and other land sales. In addition, the decrease in pre-tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was partially due to the pre-tax gain on repurchase of 4.50% Notes.
Revenues from active adult operations decreased $9,887 or 23.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. Expenses from active adult operations decreased $10,999 or 22.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to decreased closings and lower average sales prices. The decrease in expenses for fiscal year 2009 is attributable to lower volume of closings and goodwill impairment charges of $1,685 recorded during fiscal year 2008. The average sales price on closings from active adult homebuilding operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $242 compared to $273 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The average contribution margin (excluding impairment charges) on closings from active adult homebuilding operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was approximately 16% compared to approximately 27% for the year ended December 31, 2008. Included in the results from active adult operations are divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations. We experienced increased defaults in payments of club dues for our amenities compared to previous years.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
Revenues from primary residential operations decreased $11,249 or 29.4% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. Expenses from primary residential operations decreased $46,279 or 56.9% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decreases in revenues are primarily attributable to lower average sales prices in our primary residential homebuilding communities. The decreases in expenses was attributable to impairment losses of approximately $1,449 for fiscal year 2009 compared to $4,543 for fiscal year 2008 related to homes completed or under construction. In addition, we recorded $29,789 of impairment charges during fiscal year 2008 related to land developed and/or held for future development in our primary residential homebuilding communities. The average sales price on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $166 compared to $263 for the year ended December 31, 2008. The average contribution margin (excluding impairment charges) on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations for fiscal year 2009 was approximately 6% compared to approximately 12% for fiscal year 2008. Included in the results from primary residential operations was divisional overhead allocated among several communities and our amenity operations. We experienced increased defaults in payments of club dues for our amenities compared to previous years.
The amount and types of commercial and industrial and other land sold vary from year to year depending upon demand, ensuing negotiations and the timing of the closings of these sales. Revenues from commercial and industrial and other land sales decreased $11,340 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we realized pre-tax losses of $316 on revenues of $8,825 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. Expenses from commercial, industrial and other land sales decreased $21,178 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in expenses was attributable to lower volume of closings of commercial and industrial and other land sales.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, pre-tax profits from sales of commercial and industrial land were $4,405 on aggregate revenues of $4,758. For the year ended December 31, 2009, pre-tax losses from other land sales was $4,721 on aggregate revenues of $4,067.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of $13,739, which included $1,820 related to homes completed or under construction and $11,919 related to LLCs, which are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits (loss) from sales of commercial, industrial and other land were ($10,154) on revenues of $20,165. For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits from commercial and industrial land were $4,916 on aggregate revenues of $5,785. Pre-tax profits (loss) on sales of other land during the year ended December 31, 2008 were ($20,958) on aggregate revenues of $8,380. During 2008, we closed on the sale of the stock of one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the sole asset of which was land leased to a third-party that historically generated revenues to Avatar of approximately $600 per annum. Therefore, this sale was classified for financial statement purposes as a sale of other land. Pre-tax profits on this sale was $5,888 on revenues of $6,000.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we identified several assets (land) that we would be willing to sell to maximize our liquidity. The pre-tax loss from other land sales was primarily attributable to our decision to sell certain of this land. More specifically, we entered into two transactions with third parties providing for the formation of LLCs; and subsequently sold developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly formed LLCs. We also acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. These transactions generated aggregate sales proceeds to Avatar of approximately $7,847 on assets with an aggregate book value of approximately $29,334. We invested approximately $1,626 to acquire equity interests in these LLCs. These transactions generated a pre-tax loss of approximately $21,487.
During 2008, an entity in which we own a 50% interest sold all of its real estate assets. This sale generated a pre-tax loss of approximately $7,100. This loss was included in our equity loss from unconsolidated entities of $7,812 for 2008.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
Revenues from other operations decreased $542 or 35.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. Expenses from other operations decreased $746 or 48.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decreases in revenues and expenses were primarily attributable to decreased volume of transactions from our title insurance agency operations.
Interest income decreased $1,796 or 73.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decreases were primarily attributable to decreased interest rates earned on our cash and cash equivalents during 2009 as compared to 2008.
On March 30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $1,365 which was included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009. On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $5,658 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $418 which was included in Other Revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009. During 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. This repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain during the fourth quarter of 2008 of approximately $6,931 including the write-off of approximately $1,000 of deferred finance costs.
General and administrative expenses decreased $2,694 or 12.0% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decreases were primarily due to decreases in compensation expense and share-based compensation expense. The decrease in share-based compensation was due to the recording during 2008 of $1,089 in accordance with ASC 718 as a result of amendments to performance conditioned restricted stock units, previously granted to certain employees, which converted into an equal number of shares of restricted common stock. Each employee made an Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b) election (the “Section 83(b) election”) with respect to all the shares of restricted stock, Avatar agreed to vest a number of shares of restricted stock having a value approximately equal to the tax withholding amount required as a result of the Section 83(b) election, at the minimum statutory withholding rates applicable to the employee, and such shares were repurchased by Avatar.
The terms, conditions and restrictions of the restricted stock, including the vesting and forfeiture provisions, under the amended agreements are otherwise substantially the same as those that were applicable under the restricted stock unit agreements except that each employee, as an owner of this restricted stock, generally has the rights of an Avatar common stockholder, including voting and dividend rights (except that dividends on unvested shares of restricted stock generally are forfeited unless such shares ultimately vest).
Interest expense increased $2,575 or 60.1% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in interest expense was primarily attributable to the decrease in the amount of interest expense capitalized due to decreases in development and construction activities in our various projects.
Other real estate expenses, net, represented by real estate taxes, property maintenance and miscellaneous income not allocable to specific operations, decreased by $4,736 or 56.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to reductions in real estate taxes and property maintenance costs as well as an increase in miscellaneous income. These decreases were partially mitigated by an increase in charges related to the required utilities improvements of more than 8,000 residential homesites in Poinciana and Rio Rico substantially sold prior to the termination of the retail homesite sales programs in 1996. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized charges of $592 compared to $710 during the year ended December 31, 2008. These charges were based on third-party engineering evaluations. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction, material and labor as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs may have a significant effect on the estimated development liability. Also included in other real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were non-capitalizable expenditures of $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS – continued
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our reviews during 2009, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were less than its carrying value. During 2009, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108. In addition, non-capitalizable expenditures of $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2009.
Income tax benefit was provided for at an effective tax rate of 53.1% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to 22.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008. In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Based on our evaluation during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an additional valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets generated as a result of our net loss during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized an increase of $9,522 in the valuation allowance. However, due to the new federal tax legislation, we decreased the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2009 by $9,148. As of December 31, 2009, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $10,419. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized. Reference is made to the Income Taxes note to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary business activities are capital intensive in nature. Significant capital resources are required to finance planned active adult and primary residential communities, homebuilding construction in process, community infrastructure, selling expenses, new projects and working capital needs, including funding of debt service requirements, operating deficits and the carrying costs of land.
Cash Flows
As of December 31, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $115,502. As of December 31, 2010, total consolidated indebtedness was $77,057, including $64,445 carrying amount of our 4.50% Notes, $12,000 in obligations from the JEN Transaction and borrowings of $612 secured financing, compared to borrowings of $119,002 as of December 31, 2009. Additionally, we had $8,422 in restricted cash of which $7,840 is posted to collateralize outstanding letters of credit.
On October 25, 2010, Avatar acquired from JEN a portfolio of real estate assets in Arizona and Florida. The purchase price was approximately $62,000 consisting of cash, stock and notes, plus an earn-out of up to $8,000 in common stock. Additionally, we agreed to reimburse development, construction and operating expenditures made by JEN from August 1, 2010 to October 25, 2010 of approximately $3,600. The purchase price consists of $33,600 in cash (including the aforementioned $3,600), $20,000 in restricted common stock which resulted in the issuance of 1,050,572 shares subject to a two-year lock up agreement, and $12,000 of promissory notes divided equally into two $6,000 notes, one with a 1-year maturity and the second with a 2-year maturity. In addition, the agreement provides for the payment of up to $8,000 in common stock (up to 420,168 shares), depending upon the achievement of certain agreed upon metrics related to the CantaMia project by December 31, 2014.
Our operating cash flows fluctuate relative to the status of development within existing communities, expenditures for land, new developments and other real estate activities, and sales of various homebuilding product lines within those communities and other developments and to fund operating deficits.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES – continued
For the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $10,438, as a result of $7,840 used to collateralize outstanding letters of credit and $36,150 of cash used to fund operating losses. Offsetting cash used was $33,627 received in income tax refunds. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $33,422 due primarily to our investment of $33,303 (adjusted to reflect pro-rated real estate taxes) in the JEN Transaction. Net cash used by financing activities of $57,770 was attributable to $57,681 used for the repayment of borrowings of which $55,881 related to the payoff of the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility in May 2010 as described below.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $11,807, primarily as a result of $21,356 we received in income tax refunds related to taxable losses generated during fiscal 2009 and the monetization of inventory of $29,084 partially offset by decreases in accrued liabilities and customer deposits of $2,964 and $737, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $621 primarily as a result of expenditures of $422 on the Poinciana Parkway. Net cash provided by financing activities was $30,550 primarily as a result of net proceeds of $42,296 from the public offering of our common stock. Partially offsetting the net cash provided by financing activities was the repurchase for $11,627 of $14,076 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes and the repayment of $119 in real estate debt.
In 2008, net cash used in operating activities amounted to $8,993. Our use of cash is primarily attributable to payments of accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $5,188 and a decrease in customer deposits of $1,305. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $16,174 as a result of expenditures of $803 for investments in property and equipment primarily for amenities, expenditures of $13,745 on the Poinciana Parkway and investment in unconsolidated entities of $1,626. Net cash provided by financing activities of $8,305 resulted from proceeds of $56,000 and $500 from the Amended Unsecured Credit Facility and exercise of stock options, respectively. Partially offsetting the cash provided by financing activities was $28,112 used for the repurchase of 4.50% Notes, $15,855 used for the repayment of real estate debt and $4,493 used for withholding taxes related to restricted stock and units repurchased or withheld.
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property to defer the entire payment of income taxes. As a result of the property acquisitions during 2009 and 2010, including the JEN Transaction, we believe the properties acquired will satisfy the required replacement property; however, we are uncertain as to the final determination. If it is determined that we have not acquired a sufficient amount of replacement property, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the portion not replaced as of December 31, 2010.
Financing
7.50% Notes and 4.50% Notes
On January 31, 2011, Avatar and API entered into an Underwriting Agreement with the Underwriter. Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, Avatar agreed to issue and sell to the Underwriter, and the Underwriter agreed to purchase for sale in an underwritten public offering, $100,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Notes. The 7.50% Notes were sold to the Underwriter at 95.75% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, and were sold to the public at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, plus accrued interest, if any, from February 4, 2011.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES – continued
On February 4, 2011, Avatar completed the sale of the 7.50% Notes in accordance with the terms of the Underwriting Agreement. The sale of the 7.50% Notes is registered pursuant to the Registration Statement filed by Avatar with the SEC. Net proceeds to Avatar from the sale of the 7.50% Notes is approximately $95,350 after deducting the Underwriter’s discount of 4.25% and expenses estimated at approximately $400. Avatar intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the 7.50% Notes for general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, the repayment of debt, including the 4.50% Notes, which notes may be put to Avatar pursuant to the terms thereof on each of April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014, and April 1, 2019, or called by Avatar at any time on or after April 5, 2011, and potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets. On February 4, 2011, we repurchased $17,765 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $18,171. As of March 16, 2011, $47,039 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes remain outstanding.
The 7.50% Notes are governed by the Base Indenture and the Supplemental Indenture, together the Indenture, both dated as of February 4, 2011, between Avatar and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee, and include the following terms:
Interest: Interest on the 7.50% Notes is 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning on August 15, 2011.
Conversion: Holders may convert the 7.50% Notes into shares of Avatar’s common stock at any time on or prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. The 7.50% Notes are convertible at an initial conversion rate of 33.3333 shares of common stock per $1 principal amount of the 7.50% Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $30.00 per share). The conversion rate, and thus the conversion price, may be adjusted under certain circumstances, including upon the occurrence of a “non-stock change of control” as such term is defined in the Indenture. Upon any conversion, subject to certain exceptions, holders will not receive any cash payment representing accrued and unpaid interest.
Financial covenants: The Indenture includes the following financial covenants:
|
·
|
until February 15, 2014, Avatar will maintain, at all times, cash and cash equivalents of not less than $20,000;
|
|
·
|
until the second anniversary of the original issuance date of the 7.50% Notes, Avatar’s total consolidated indebtedness (as “indebtedness” is defined in the Indenture) may not exceed $150,000 at any time excluding, for purposes of this covenant, until April 5, 2011, Avatar’s outstanding 4.50% Notes;
|
|
·
|
until the second anniversary of the original issuance date of the 7.50% Notes, Avatar’s total consolidated indebtedness (as “indebtedness” is defined in the Indenture) shall not exceed $50,000 at any time, excluding for purposes of this covenant: (a) the 7.50% Notes, (b) any indebtedness with a maturity date after February 15, 2014, which indebtedness does not provide the holder with a unilateral put right prior to February 15, 2014 and (c) until April 5, 2011, amounts outstanding under Avatar’s 4.50% Notes.
|
Repurchase Right: Holders of the 7.50% Notes have the right to require Avatar to repurchase the Notes on February 15, 2014; or upon the occurrence of a breach of any of the financial covenants, a “fundamental change” (as defined in the Indenture), or an event of default (as described in the Indenture).
Redemption Right: Avatar may, at any time on or after February 15, 2014, at its option, redeem for cash all or any portion of the outstanding 7.50% Notes, but only if the last reported sale price of Avatar’s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date Avatar provides the notice of redemption to holders exceeds 130% of the conversion price in effect on each such trading day and certain other conditions described in the Indenture are met.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES – continued
On March 30, 2004, we issued $120,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.50% Notes in a private offering. Interest is payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1. The 4.50% Notes are senior, unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future unsecured and senior indebtedness. However, the 4.50% Notes are effectively subordinated to all of our existing and future secured debt to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future liabilities of our subsidiaries.
We may, at our option, redeem for cash all or a portion of the 4.50% Notes at any time on or after April 5, 2011. Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019; or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 4.50% Notes, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their 4.50% Notes. In each case, we will pay a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
FASB ASC 470-20 requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash on conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. ASC 470-20 requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount and the debt issuance costs are amortized to interest cost using the interest method over the expected life of a similar liability that does not have an associated equity component.
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the 4.50% Notes and the equity component associated with ASC 470-20 was comprised of the following:
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
4.50% Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal amount
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
Net carrying amount
|
|
$ |
64,445 |
|
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Component, net of income tax benefit
|
|
$ |
13,737 |
|
|
$ |
13,737 |
|
The discount on the liability component of the 4.50% Notes is amortized using the effective interest method based on an effective rate of 7.5%, which was the estimated market interest rate for similar debt without a conversion option on the issuance date. The discount is amortized from the issuance date in 2004 through April 1, 2011, the first date that holders of the 4.50% Notes can require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes. As of December 31, 2010, the remaining expected life over which the unamortized discount will be recognized is less than one year. We recognized $1,435, $1,549 and $2,665 in non-cash interest charges related to the amortization of the discount during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) -- continued
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES – continued
Credit Agreement; Secured Obligations; Performance Bonds
On March 27, 2008, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc., as borrower, Wachovia Bank, National Association (as a lender and as administrative agent on behalf of the lenders), and certain financial institutions as lenders (the “Amended Unsecured Credit Facility”). This agreement amended and restated the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2005, as amended.
On May 3, 2010, we paid in full the outstanding principal and accrued interest of $55,979 under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In addition, on May 4, 2010, we deposited $22,042 with Wells Fargo, N.A., successor by merger with Wachovia Bank, N.A., to collateralize letters of credit. In connection with such payment and deposit, we notified our administrative agent that we were exercising our right to reduce our commitment amount under the facility to zero dollars ($0), which had the effect of terminating all parties’ obligations under the credit facility, effective as of May 17, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $7,840 remains deposited to collateralize outstanding letters of credit.
As of December 31, 2010, we have approximately $501 outstanding from secured obligations related to the JEN Transaction. On October 25, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Mutual of Omaha Bank whereby Avatar became the Substitute Guarantor under a $3,000 construction loan facility made by Mutual of Omaha to Joseph Carl Homes, LLC (now known as Avatar Properties of Arizona, LLC) and JCH Group, LLC. This construction loan facility bears interest at prime plus 2% with a minimum floor of 6%. The maturity date of this facility is May 12, 2011. As of December 31, 2010, $396 was outstanding. As of December 31, 2010, the interest rate on this facility was 6%. In addition, we have notes payable of $105 to the seller of 7 lots secured by deeds of trust that are non-interest bearing with principal maturity due at the earlier of March 2011 and June 2011 or the closing of the lot by a third party.
Performance bonds, issued by third party entities, are used primarily to guarantee our performance to construct improvements in our various communities. As of December 31, 2010, we had outstanding performance bonds of approximately $9,007. We do not believe that it is likely any of these outstanding performance bonds will be drawn upon.
Poinciana Parkway
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County, Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the "Poinciana Parkway"). The Poinciana Parkway is to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. We will need to permit an interchange between the Poinciana Parkway and U.S. 17/92 in Polk County prior to commencing construction of the road. We have obtained an extension of our South Florida Water Management District permit to February 14, 2018. In July 2008 and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk County. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with Osceola County in December 2010 and the amendment to our agreement with Polk County in October 2010, funding for the Poinciana Parkway is to be obtained by and construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be commenced by February 14, 2012. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with both Counties, construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be completed by May 7, 2014, subject to extension for Force Majeure. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained and construction of the Poinciana Parkway cannot be commenced by February 14, 2012, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or seek specific performance. Polk County’s sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. With respect to Osceola County, if funding and commencement of construction is not met, (i) a portion of Avatar’s land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES – continued
Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain federal and/or state funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including highway tax bill monies, a newly announced federal transportation grant and a federal loan. We cannot predict whether any federal or state funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of future cash flows.
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $47,449 has been expended. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively, associated with the Poinciana Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our review during 2010, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were greater than its carrying value, therefore no impairment losses were recorded during 2010. Non-capitalizable expenditures of $324 and $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2010 and 2009, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,452.
Other
On October 13, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $9,864 previously authorized. On October 17, 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. On December 12, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $1,888 remaining after the October 2008 activities. During 2009, we repurchased $14,076 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $11,696 including accrued interest. As of December 31, 2010, the remaining authorization is $18,304.
Assuming that no additional significant adverse changes in our business occur, we anticipate, the aggregate cash on hand, cash flow generated through homebuilding and related operations, and sales of commercial and industrial and other land, will provide sufficient liquidity to fund our business for 2011. (See “Results of Operations – Fiscal Year 2011 Outlook.”)
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
GAAP requires a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to be consolidated with a company which is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Entities determined to be VIEs, for which we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method.
Avatar’s variable interest in VIEs may be in the form of (1) equity ownership, (2) contracts to purchase assets and/or (3) loans provided by Avatar to a VIE. We examine specific criteria and use judgment when determining if Avatar is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions, level of economic disproportionality between Avatar and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest. These entities are VIEs and our investments in these entities, along with other arrangements represent variable interests, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We analyze these entities when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event.
Avatar shares in the profits and losses of these unconsolidated entities generally in accordance with its ownership interests. Avatar and its equity partners make initial or ongoing capital contributions to these unconsolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make capital contributions is governed by each unconsolidated entity’s respective operating agreement.
During 2009 and 2008, we entered into various transactions with unaffiliated third parties providing for the formation of LLCs; and we subsequently sold developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly-formed LLCs. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. Avatar made contributions totaling $143 and $42 to these unconsolidated entities in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, these unconsolidated entities were financed by partner equity and do not have third-party debt. In addition, we have not provided any guarantees to these entities or our equity partners.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table reflects contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
Contractual Obligations (1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
3 - 5 Years
|
|
|
More than 5 Years years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations
|
|
$ |
77,057 |
|
|
$ |
6,612 |
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
(2) |
Interest Obligations on Long-Term Debt
|
|
$ |
47,386 |
|
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
|
$ |
5,832 |
|
|
$ |
5,832 |
|
|
$ |
24,058 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
$ |
4,395 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Purchase Obligations – Residential Development
|
|
$ |
7,059 |
|
|
$ |
7,059 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Compensation Obligations
|
|
$ |
6,814 |
|
|
$ |
2,726 |
|
|
$ |
2,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,850 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Balance Sheet under GAAP
|
|
$ |
20,288 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,288 |
|
(1) Excluded from this table are future costs related to the Poinciana Parkway (described above) since timing and amount of future costs are currently estimated.
(2) Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019; or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 4.50% Notes.
Long-term debt obligations represent:
|
·
|
$64,804 outstanding under the 4.50% Notes; however, holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019, or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 4.50% Notes
|
|
·
|
$110 community development district obligations associated with Sterling Hill in Hernando County, Florida, payable by 2010
|
|
·
|
Two notes for $6,000 bearing interest at 6% with maturity dates of October 25, 2011 and October 25, 2012
|
|
·
|
$396 construction loan facility bearing interest at prime plus 2% with a minimum floor of 6%. The maturity date of this facility is May 12, 2011 and $105 notes payable to the seller of 7 lots secured with principal maturity due at the earlier of March 2011 and June 2011 or the closing of the lot by a third party.
|
Purchase obligations (residential development) represent purchase commitments of $7,059 as of December 31, 2010 for land development and construction expenditures, substantially for homebuilding operations which relate to contracts for services, materials and supplies, which obligations generally relate to corresponding contracts for sales of homes. Compensation obligations represent compensation to executives pursuant to employment contracts.
Other long-term contractual obligations represent the estimated cost-to-complete of certain utilities improvements in areas within Poinciana and Rio Rico where homesites have been sold.
Item 7.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands except per share data) – continued
|
EFFECTS OF INFLATION AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
Our operations have been negatively affected by general economic conditions. Reduction in real estate value, adverse changes in employment levels, consumer income and confidence, available financing and interest rates may continue to result in fewer sales and/or lower sales prices. Other economic conditions could affect operations (see “Risk Factors”).
The weakening of the residential real estate market has negatively impacted the homebuilding industry. Since 2008, the market for homes in the geographic areas in which our developments are located was severely and negatively impacted by the dislocations in the financial markets and the collapse or near collapse of major financial institutions. Unemployment has increased significantly and consumer confidence has continued to erode. We have experienced a significant increase in the number of homes for sale or available for purchase or rent through foreclosures or otherwise. The price points at which these homes are available have put further downward pressure on our margins.
The housing market in the geographic areas in which our developments are located continues to be compromised by an oversupply of alternatives to new homes, including rental properties and investment homes available for sale, foreclosures, and homes being sold by lenders. We continue to manage our housing inventory levels through curtailing land development, reducing home starts and reducing selling prices to enable us to deliver completed homes.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements discussed in Item 1 (Business), Item 3 (Legal Proceedings), Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations), and elsewhere in this Form 10-K constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others: the stability of certain financial markets; disruption of the credit markets and reduced availability and more stringent financing requirements for commercial and residential mortgages of all types; the number of investor and speculator resale homes for sale and homes in foreclosure in our communities and in the geographic areas in which we develop and sell homes; the increased level of unemployment; the decline in net worth and/or of income of potential buyers; the decline in consumer confidence; the failure to successfully implement our business strategy (including our intentions to focus primarily on the development of active adult communities in the future); shifts in demographic trends affecting demand for active adult and primary housing; the level of immigration and migration into the areas in which we conduct real estate activities; our access to financing; construction defect and home warranty claims; changes in, or the failure or inability to comply with, government regulations; the failure to successfully integrate acquisitions into our business, including our recent JEN Transaction and other factors as are described in Item 1A (Risk Factors) of this Form 10-K. At least 80% of active adult homes are intended for occupancy by at least one person 55 years or older. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-lacking statements contained herein, which reflect management's opinions only as of the date hereof.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Avatar is subject to market risk associated with changes in interest rates and the cyclical nature of the real estate industry. A majority of the purchasers of our homes finance their purchases through third-party lenders providing mortgage financing or, to some extent, rely upon investment income. In general, housing demand is dependent on home equity, consumer savings, employment and income levels and third-party financing and is adversely affected by increases in interest rates, unavailability of mortgage financing, increasing housing costs and unemployment levels. The amount or value of discretionary income and savings, including retirement assets, available to home purchasers can be affected by a decline in the capital markets. Fluctuations in interest rates could adversely affect our real estate results of operations and liquidity because of the negative impact on the housing industry. Real estate developers are subject to various risks, many of which are outside their control, including real estate market conditions (both where our communities and homebuilding operations are located and in areas where our potential customers reside), changing demographic conditions, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires, delays in construction schedules, cost overruns, changes in government regulations or requirements, increases in real estate taxes and other local government fees, availability and cost of land, materials and labor, and access to financing. See Notes H and Q (debt payout and fair values) to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Report. (See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further discussion of risks.)
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets -- December 31, 2010 and 2009
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations -- For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity -- For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
59
|
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Avatar Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on the framework in “Internal Control—Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, that audited the consolidated financial statements of Avatar Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries included in this annual report, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The attestation report follows this report.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Avatar Holdings Inc.
We have audited Avatar Holdings Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Avatar Holdings Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Avatar Holdings Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 of Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated March 16, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
Certified Public Accountants
|
Miami, Florida
March 16, 2011
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Avatar Holdings Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Avatar Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 16, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
|
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
Certified Public Accountants
|
Miami, Florida
March 16, 2011
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
115,502 |
|
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
6,434 |
|
|
|
6,656 |
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
35,018 |
|
Land and other inventories
|
|
|
326,710 |
|
|
|
264,236 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
45,514 |
|
|
|
48,010 |
|
Poinciana Parkway
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
Investment in and notes receivable from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
5,194 |
|
|
|
5,321 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
10,242 |
|
|
|
9,165 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
17,215 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
545,451 |
|
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
3,743 |
|
|
$ |
2,014 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
5,293 |
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenues
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
2,874 |
|
Earn-out liability
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Estimated development liability for sold land
|
|
|
20,288 |
|
|
|
20,417 |
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
76,445 |
|
|
|
63,010 |
|
Real estate
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
55,992 |
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
114,962 |
|
|
|
149,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $1 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 50,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued: 15,562,732 shares at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,013,912 shares at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
15,563 |
|
|
|
14,014 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
305,672 |
|
|
|
286,096 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
187,820 |
|
|
|
222,928 |
|
|
|
|
509,055 |
|
|
|
523,038 |
|
Treasury stock: at cost, 2,662,106 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2,658,461 at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(79,010 |
) |
|
|
(78,937 |
) |
Total Avatar stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
430,045 |
|
|
|
444,101 |
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
430,489 |
|
|
|
445,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$ |
545,451 |
|
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in thousands except per-share amounts)
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate revenues
|
|
$ |
57,259 |
|
|
$ |
69,104 |
|
|
$ |
102,210 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
59,138 |
|
|
|
73,501 |
|
|
|
110,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate expenses
|
|
|
68,220 |
|
|
|
86,750 |
|
|
|
134,414 |
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
21,847 |
|
|
|
83,811 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
20,508 |
|
|
|
19,694 |
|
|
|
22,388 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,531 |
|
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
4,282 |
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
94,919 |
|
|
|
135,148 |
|
|
|
244,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(7,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(36,057 |
) |
|
|
(61,843 |
) |
|
|
(142,341 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
32,860 |
|
|
|
32,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (including net loss attributable to non-controlling interests)
|
|
|
(35,682 |
) |
|
|
(28,983 |
) |
|
|
(109,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to Avatar
|
|
$ |
(35,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
|
|
$ |
(3.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.11 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.85 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in
|
|
|
Non-Controlling
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
|
11,076,644 |
|
|
$ |
11,077 |
|
|
$ |
238,146 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
361,787 |
|
|
|
(2,551,232 |
) |
|
$ |
(75,989 |
) |
Issuances from exercise of earnings participation stock award
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Issuances from exercise of stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
164,170 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Shares withheld for statutory minimum withholding taxes related to issuance of restricted stock units and earnings participation stock award
|
|
|
(52,021 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(1,435 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Issuances of restricted stock
|
|
|
294,900 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Repurchase of restricted stock to satisfy employee statutory minimum withholding taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(107,229 |
) |
|
|
(2,948 |
) |
Tax benefit from exercise of restricted stock units and stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of restricted stock units and stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(109,876 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
11,488,259 |
|
|
|
11,488 |
|
|
|
245,049 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
251,911 |
|
|
|
(2,658,461 |
) |
|
|
(78,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,514,391 |
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
39,782 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Issuances of restricted stock units and stock units
|
|
|
11,262 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Tax benefit from exercise of restricted stock units and stock units
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of restricted stock units and stock units
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Capital contributions from on-controlling interest in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(28,983 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
14,013,912 |
|
|
$ |
14,014 |
|
|
$ |
286,096 |
|
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
|
$ |
222,928 |
|
|
|
(2,658,461 |
) |
|
$ |
(78,937 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity – continued
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional Paid-in
|
|
|
Non-Controlling
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount
|
|
Issuance of common stock in JEN Transaction
|
|
|
1,050,572 |
|
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
|
$ |
18,648 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Issuances of restricted stock units and stock units
|
|
|
498,248 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Repurchase of restricted stock to satisfy employee statutory minimum withholding taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,645 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Amortization of restricted stock units and stock units
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss attributable to non- controlling interests
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(35,108 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
15,562,732 |
|
|
$ |
15,563 |
|
|
$ |
305,672 |
|
|
$ |
444 |
|
|
$ |
187,820 |
|
|
|
(2,662,106 |
) |
|
$ |
(79,010 |
) |
There are 10,000,000 authorized shares of $0.10 par value preferred stock, none of which are issued.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (including net loss attributable to non-controlling interests)
|
|
$ |
(35,682 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,876 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,794 |
|
|
|
5,246 |
|
|
|
6,758 |
|
Amortization of stock based compensation
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
Impairment of land and other inventories
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
51,898 |
|
Impairment of Poinciana Parkway
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,108 |
|
|
|
30,228 |
|
Gain from repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
(5,286 |
) |
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
7,812 |
|
Distributions (return) of earnings from an unconsolidated entity
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(10,962 |
) |
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options and restricted stock units
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(920 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
(7,723 |
) |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
Receivables and income tax receivable
|
|
|
33,546 |
|
|
|
(16,410 |
) |
|
|
(16,429 |
) |
Notes receivable from sale of land to an unconsolidated entity
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,669 |
) |
Land and other inventories
|
|
|
(6,300 |
) |
|
|
29,084 |
|
|
|
35,665 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
5,224 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities
|
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(2,964 |
) |
|
|
(5,188 |
) |
Earn-out liability
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Customer deposits and deferred revenues
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(1,305 |
) |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(10,438 |
) |
|
|
11,807 |
|
|
|
(8,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in property and equipment
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(803 |
) |
Return from (investment in) Poinciana Parkway
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(13,745 |
) |
Investment related to JEN Transaction
|
|
|
(33,303 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Investment in unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(1,626 |
) |
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(33,422 |
) |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
(16,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Amended Unsecured Credit Facility
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
56,000 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of restricted stock units and stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
42,296 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11,627 |
) |
|
|
(28,112 |
) |
Principal payments of real estate borrowings
|
|
|
(57,681 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(15,855 |
) |
Payment of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(655 |
) |
Payment of withholding taxes related to restricted stock and units withheld
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(57,770 |
) |
|
|
30,550 |
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(101,630 |
) |
|
|
41,736 |
|
|
|
(16,862 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
217,132 |
|
|
|
175,396 |
|
|
|
192,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
|
|
$ |
115,502 |
|
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
175,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt from the JEN Transaction |
|
$ |
14,301 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands except per-share data)
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
We are engaged in the business of real estate operations in Florida and Arizona. Our residential community development activities have been adversely affected in both markets, bringing development of our active adult and primary residential communities to their lowest level in several years. We also engage in other real estate activities, such as the operation of amenities, the sale for third-party development of commercial and industrial land and the operation of a title insurance agency, which activities have also been adversely affected by economic conditions.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Avatar Holdings Inc. and all subsidiaries, partnerships and entities in which Avatar Holdings Inc. (“Avatar”, “we”, “us” or “our”) has a controlling interest. Our investments in unconsolidated entities in which we have less than a controlling interest are accounted for using the equity method. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those reported.
Due to our normal operating cycle being in excess of one year, Avatar presents unclassified consolidated balance sheets.
Certain 2009 and 2008 financial statement items have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
JEN Transaction
During October 2010 (“the acquisition date”), we acquired from entities affiliated with JEN Partners LLC (“JEN”) a portfolio of real estate assets in Arizona and Florida (the “JEN Transaction”). The purchase price was approximately $62,000, consisting of cash, stock and promissory notes, plus an earn-out of up to $8,000 in common stock. Additionally, we agreed to reimburse development, construction and operating expenditures made by JEN from August 1, 2010 to October 25, 2010 of approximately $3,600.
The assets and properties acquired in the JEN Transaction include:
Arizona Assets:
• CantaMia - a 1,781-unit active adult community located in the Estrella Mountain Ranch Master Plan Community in Goodyear, Arizona. CantaMia is composed of three phases. On October 25, 2010, we acquired phase 1 consisting of 593 partially or fully developed lots, 29 houses under construction, a recreation center scheduled to open during March 2011 and a fully finished sales center; and an option for phases 2 and 3 consisting of 1,138 undeveloped lots. The option price for phases 2 and 3 approximates $9,600, of which $1,000 was paid during December 2010.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
JEN Transaction - continued
• Various Arizona Properties - includes 99 fully developed lots, 15 houses completed or under construction and 16 developed lots for which we have an option to acquire.
• Joseph Carl Homes, LLC (now known as Avatar Properties of Arizona, LLC) - a Phoenix-based private home builder and the developer of CantaMia.
Florida Assets:
• Sharpe properties - 445 acres located in Orange County, Florida, comprised of 839 partially developed single-family and townhome lots, a multi-family tract, and a two-acre commercial site.
The acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred totaled $69,085, which consisted of $33,600 in cash (including the aforementioned $3,600), $19,698 in restricted common stock which resulted in the issuance of 1,050,572 shares subject to a two-year lock up agreement, $12,000 of notes divided equally into two $6,000 notes, one with a one-year maturity and the second with a two-year maturity and contingent consideration (earn-out) of $4,149. At closing, we entered into an earn-out agreement with the seller which provides for the payment of up to $8,000 in common stock (up to 420,168 shares), depending upon the achievement of certain agreed upon metrics related to the CantaMia project by December 31, 2014. We estimated the fair value of the earn-out using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. This fair value measurement is based on a discounted cash flow and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820 (see Note Q). As of December 31, 2010, there were no significant changes in the range of outcomes of the earn-out compared to the acquisition date. As of December 31, 2010, the earn-out liability increased to $4,388 as a result of an increase in Avatar’s stock price as of December 31, 2010 compared to the acquisition date. Legal and accounting expenses incurred for the JEN Transaction was approximately $1,800 and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
|
|
October 25, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and other inventories
|
|
$ |
57,824 |
|
Less: Net liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(5,954 |
) |
Net identifiable assets acquired
|
|
$ |
51,870 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
17,215 |
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
69,085 |
|
Included in our consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date to the period ending December 31, 2010 are revenues of $4,408 and losses of $1,025 from the operations related to the assets and properties acquired in the JEN Transaction.
The following represents the pro forma consolidated statement of operations as if the JEN Transaction had been included in the consolidated results of Avatar for the entire years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
66,112 |
|
|
$ |
76,410 |
|
Net Loss
|
|
$ |
37,619 |
|
|
$ |
29,602 |
|
Mr. Joshua Nash, our Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Mr. Paul Barnett, a member of our Board of Directors, in the aggregate own a 1.5% indirect limited partnership interest in the JEN affiliates from which we purchased the above assets. Neither Mr. Nash nor Mr. Barnett voted on the JEN Transaction.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We also consider closing proceeds from our house closings held by our title insurance agency as cash equivalents which were $725 and $330 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, our cash and cash equivalents were invested primarily in money market accounts that invest in U.S. government securities. Due to the short maturity period of the cash equivalents, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates their fair values.
Restricted cash includes deposits of $8,422 and $699 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The balance as of December 31, 2010 is comprised primarily of $7,840 on deposit with Wells Fargo, N.A. to collateralize letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility and $582 of housing deposits from customers that will become available when the housing contracts close. We held escrow funds of $100 and $383 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which are not considered assets of ours and, therefore, are excluded from restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Receivables, net
Receivables, net includes amounts in transit or due from title companies for house closings; membership dues related to our amenity operations; and contracts and mortgage notes receivable from the sale of land.
Income Tax Receivable
Income tax receivable consists of tax refunds we expect to receive within one year. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there was $1,766 and $35,018, respectively, of income tax receivables. During 2010 we received tax refunds of $33,627.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Land and Other Inventories
Land and Other Inventories are stated at cost unless the asset is determined to be impaired, in which case the asset would be written down to its fair value. Land and Other Inventories include expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated costs. Land and Other Inventories owned and constructed by us also include interest cost capitalized until development and construction are substantially completed. Land and development costs, construction and direct and allocated costs are assigned to components of Land and Other Inventories based on specific identification or other allocation methods based upon United States generally accepted accounting principles.
In accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360-10”) we review our Land and Other Inventories for indicators of impairment.
For assets held and used, if indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. Generally, fair value is determined by discounting the estimated cash flows at a rate commensurate with the inherent risks associated with the asset and related estimated cash flow streams. Assumptions and estimates used in the determination of the estimated future cash flows are based on expectations of future operations and economic conditions and certain factors described below. Changes to these assumptions could significantly affect the estimates of future cash flows which could affect the potential for future impairments. Due to the uncertainties of the estimation process, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.
For assets held for sale (such as completed speculative housing inventory), we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the fair value (estimated sales prices) less cost to sell the asset to its carrying value. If such fair value less cost to sell is less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value less cost to sell.
We evaluate our Land and Other Inventories for impairment on a quarterly basis. During 2010, our impairment assessment resulted in impairment charges of $660 which related to homes completed or under construction. Our evaluation of land developed and/or held for future development or sale did not result in impairment charges during 2010. As of December 31, 2010, other than the Land and Other Inventories that we determined to be impaired and accordingly wrote down to their carrying value, we had no long-lived assets that had undiscounted cash flows within 25% of their carrying values.
The impairment charges for the years ended 2010, 2009, and 2008 reflect market conditions, including a significant oversupply of homes available for sale, higher foreclosure activity and significant competition. During 2010, we recorded impairment charges of $660 relating to homes completed or under construction. The following significant trends were utilized in the evaluation of our land and other inventories for impairment:
Active Adult Communities
The average price on sales closed from active adult homebuilding operations during 2010 was $195 compared to $242 during 2009. Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during 2010 was $197 compared to $211 during 2009. The decreases in average sales prices for sales and closings were due to the lower sales prices at Seasons at Tradition compared to Solivita. Additionally, the average contribution margin on closings from active adult homebuilding operations was approximately 28% during 2010 compared to approximately 16% during 2009. The increase in average contribution margins on closings from active adult homebuilding operations is attributable to the closings at Seasons at Tradition which generated higher margins as a result of our acquisition price. During 2010, at Seasons at Tradition, we had 72 closings with an aggregate dollar value of approximately $10,981. As of December 31, 2010, we had 16 completed homes remaining in inventory at Seasons at Tradition.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Land and Other Inventories – continued
Primary Residential Communities
The average price on sales closed from primary residential homebuilding operations during 2010 was $219 compared to $166 during 2009. Our average sales price on sales contracts entered into during 2010 was $241 compared to $157 during 2009. The increases in average sales price were due to changes in mix between our lower and higher price communities. The average contribution margin on closings from primary residential homebuilding operations was approximately (1%) during 2010 compared to approximately 6% during 2009.
Land and Other Inventories that are subject to a review for indicators of impairment include our: (i) housing communities (active adult and primary residential, including scattered lots) and (ii) land developed and/or held for future development or sale. A discussion of the factors that impact our impairment assessment for these categories follows:
Housing communities: Activities include the development of active adult and primary residential communities and the operation of amenities. The operating results and losses generated from active adult and primary residential communities during 2010 and 2009 include operating expenses relating to the operation of the amenities in our communities as well as divisional overhead allocated among several communities.
Our active adult and primary residential communities are generally large master-planned communities in Florida and in Arizona. Several of these communities are long term projects on land we have owned for many years. In reviewing each of our communities, we determine if potential impairment indicators exist by reviewing actual contribution margins on homes closed in recent months, projected contribution margins on homes in backlog, projected contribution margins on speculative homes, average selling prices, sales activities and local market conditions. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated cost of home construction, estimated land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas in which we build and sell homes, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. Except for those primary residential communities recently acquired in the JEN Transaction, build-out of our active adult and primary residential communities generally exceeds five years. Our current assumptions are based on current activity and recent trends at our active adult and primary residential communities. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial number of variables to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future impairments.
Declines in contribution margins below those realized from our current sales prices and estimations could result in future impairment losses in one or more of our housing communities.
Land developed and/or held for future development or sale: Our land developed and/or held for future development or sale represents land holdings for the potential development of future active adult and/or primary residential communities. For land developed and/or held for future development or sale, indicators of potential impairment include changes in use, changes in local market conditions, declines in the selling prices of similar assets and increases in costs. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, the estimated future cash flows are significantly impacted by specific community factors such as: (i) sales absorption rates; (ii) estimated sales prices and sales incentives; and (iii) estimated costs of home construction, estimated land and land development costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs. In addition, our estimated future cash flows are also impacted by general economic and local market conditions, competition from other homebuilders, foreclosures and depressed home sales in the areas where we own land for future development, product desirability in our local markets and the buyers’ ability to obtain mortgage financing. Factors that we consider in determining the appropriateness of moving forward with land development or whether to write-off the related amounts capitalized include: our current inventory levels, local market economic conditions, availability of adequate resources and the estimated future net cash flows to be generated from the project.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Land and Other Inventories – continued
Except for those primary residential communities recently acquired in the JEN Transaction, build-out of our active adult and primary residential communities generally exceeds five years.. There are a significant number of assumptions with respect to each analysis. Many of these assumptions extend over a significant number of years. The substantial number of variables to these assumptions could significantly affect the potential for future impairments.
Declines in market values below those realized from our current sales prices and estimations could result in future impairment.
Property and Equipment
Property and Equipment are stated at cost and depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets: land improvements 10 to 25 years; buildings and improvements 8 to 39 years; and machinery, equipment and fixtures 3 to 7 years. Maintenance and operating expenses of equipment utilized in the development of land are capitalized as land inventory cost. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Property and Equipment includes the cost of amenities owned by us. The cost of amenities includes expenditures for land acquisition, construction, land development and direct and allocated costs. Property and Equipment owned and constructed by us also includes interest cost incurred during development and construction.
Each reporting period, we review our Property and Equipment for indicators of impairment in accordance with ASC 360-10. For our amenities, which are located within our housing communities, indicators of potential impairment are similar to those of our housing communities (described above) as these factors may impact our ability to generate revenues at our amenities or cause construction costs to increase. In addition, we factor in the collectibility and potential delinquency of the fees due for our amenities. During 2009, we recorded an impairment expense of approximately $2,100 related to the amenities at Terralargo due to the sale to an LLC which we consolidate. As of December 31, 2010 no impairments existed for Property and Equipment.
Poinciana Parkway
Poinciana Parkway includes expenditures for right-of-way acquisition, development, construction and direct and allocated costs. Poinciana Parkway also includes interest cost incurred during development and construction.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, the asset is reviewed for impairment as described above. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of future cash flows.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our review during 2010, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were greater than its carrying value, therefore no impairment losses were recorded during 2010. During 2009 and 2008, we recognized impairment losses of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively. Non-capitalizable expenditures of $324 and $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2010 and 2009, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,452.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets are significant components of our consolidated balance sheets. Our policies regarding the valuation of intangible assets affect the amount of future amortization and possible impairment charges we may incur. Assumptions and estimates about future values of our intangible and other long-lived assets are complex and subjective. They can be affected by a variety of factors, including external factors such as consumer spending habits and general economic trends, and internal factors such as changes in our business strategy and our internal forecasts.
In accordance with ASC 350, we review the carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets of each of our reporting units on an annual basis as of December 31, or more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances, based on a two-step impairment test. We consider our Active Adult Communities segment to be individual reporting unit which is also an individual operating segment. Goodwill acquired in business combinations is assigned to the reporting unit expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination as of the acquisition date. We concluded the business combination from the JEN Transaction benefited our active adult communities reporting segment. The first step of the impairment test compares the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount including goodwill. The fair value of each reporting unit is calculated using the average of an income approach and a market comparison approach which utilizes similar companies as the basis for the valuation. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of any impairment loss. The impairment loss is determined by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying value of goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill represents the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over amounts assigned to its net assets.
The determination of fair value utilizes an evaluation of historical and forecasted operating results and other estimates. Fair value measurements are generally determined through the use of valuation techniques that may include a discounted cash flow approach, which reflects our own assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
During the year, we monitor the actual performance of our reporting units relative to the fair value assumptions used in our annual goodwill impairment test, including potential events and changes in circumstance affecting our key estimates and assumptions.
On October 25, 2010, we recorded goodwill of $17,215 as a result of the JEN Transaction which was allocated to our active adult reporting segment. As a result of our annual impairment goodwill test we did not record any impairment losses as of December 31, 2010.
We generally perform our annual test as of December 31 each year unless facts and circumstances warranted more frequent evaluations. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the market for homes in the geographic areas in which our developments are located was severely and negatively impacted by the dislocations in the financial markets and the collapse or near collapse of major financial institutions. During 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of $1,685 relating to the goodwill associated with our active adult community reporting unit, which until October 25, 2010 represented our only goodwill.
Revenues
In accordance with ASC 360, revenues from the sales of housing units are recognized when the sales are closed and title passes to the purchasers. In addition, revenues from commercial, industrial and other land sales are recognized in full at closing, provided the purchaser's initial and continuing investment is adequate, all financing is considered collectible and there is no significant continuing involvement.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, advertising costs totaled $1,342, $725 and $1,330, respectively, and are included in Real Estate Expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Warranty Costs
Warranty reserves for houses are established to cover estimated costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims to be incurred subsequent to the closing of a house. Reserves are determined based on historical data and other relevant factors. We may have recourse against subcontractors for claims relating to workmanship and materials. Warranty reserves are included in Accrued and Other Liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, changes in the warranty reserve consist of the following:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve as of January 1
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
Estimated warranty expense
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
Amounts charged against warranty reserve
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(643 |
) |
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
Warranty reserve as of December 31
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
Income Taxes
Income taxes have been provided using the liability method under ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). The liability method is used in accounting for income taxes where deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.
ASC 740 provides guidance in the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements. These provisions prescribe a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, these provisions also provide guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. Based on our evaluation of tax positions, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 which remain subject to examination and adjustment by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2010.
On October 25, 2010, we received notification from the Internal Revenue Service that our federal income tax returns for tax years 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2009 are being examined. At this time it is not determinable as to the outcome of their examination as the IRS is in the preliminary stages of its review.
Any interest or penalties that have been assessed in the past have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the event we are assessed any interest or penalties in the future, we plan to include them in our statement of operations as income tax expense.
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property to defer the entire payment of income taxes. As a result of the property acquisitions during 2009 and 2010, including the JEN Transaction, we believe the properties acquired will satisfy the required replacement property; however, we are uncertain as to the final determination. If it is determined that we have not acquired a sufficient amount of replacement property, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the portion determined not to have been replaced as of December 31, 2010.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Non-controlling Interest
Avatar has consolidated certain LLCs, which qualify as variable interest entities (“VIEs”) because we determined that Avatar is the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the LLCs’ financial statements are consolidated in Avatar’s consolidated financial statements and the other partners’ equity in each of the LLCs is recorded as non-controlling interest as a component of consolidated stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, non-controlling interest was $444 and $1,018, respectively. The decrease in non-controlling interest of $574 is a result of the losses generated from these LLCs during the year ended December 31, 2010.
Common Stock Offering
In August 2009, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 for $500,000 of debt and equity securities, which was supplemented in September 2009 by a supplemental prospectus for a public offering of shares of our Common Stock, underwritten by Barclays Capital Inc. (the “Underwriter”). We agreed to sell to the Underwriter 2,250,000 shares of our Common Stock, which were offered to the public at a price of $18.00 per share and discounted to the Underwriter to a price of $17.10 per share. The Underwriter was granted an over-allotment option to purchase up to an additional 337,500 shares of Common Stock, at the same offering price to the public and subject to the same underwriting discount. The closing on the sale of the 2,250,000 shares of Common Stock occurred on September 28, 2009. Net proceeds to us before expenses were $38,475. On October 6, 2009, we closed on the sale of an additional 264,391 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to the Underwriter’s partial exercise of its option to purchase additional shares, which option expired on October 23, 2009. Net proceeds of the partial exercise of the option were $4,521, resulting in total net proceeds of the offering, after approximately $700 of offering expenses, of approximately $42,296.
Share-Based Compensation
The Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as amended, (the “Incentive Plan”) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to officers, employees and directors of Avatar. The exercise prices of stock options may not be less than the stock exchange closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan generally expire 10 years after the date of grant.
As of December 31, 2010, an aggregate of 148,293 shares of our Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments, were reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan, including an aggregate of 139,842 options, restricted stock units and stock units granted. There were 8,451 shares available for grant at December 31, 2010.
Cash flows resulting from tax benefits relating to tax deductions in excess of the compensation expense recognized for those options (“excess tax benefits”) are classified and reported as both an operating cash outflow and a financing cash inflow. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, we classified $0, $0 and $920, respectively, of excess tax benefits as financing cash inflows.
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Repurchase of Common Stock and Notes
On October 13, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $9,864 previously authorized. On October 17, 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. On December 12, 2008, our Board of Directors amended its June 2005 authorization to purchase the 4.50% Notes and/or common stock to allow expenditures up to $30,000, including the $1,888 remaining after the October 2008 activities. On March 30, 2009, we repurchased $7,500 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $6,038 including accrued interest. On June 19, 2009, we repurchased $6,576 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $5,658 including accrued interest. As of December 31, 2010, the remaining authorization is $18,304.
Loss Per Share
We present loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of Avatar. In accordance with ASC 260, the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 did not assume the effect of restricted stock units, employee stock options or the 4.50% Notes because the effects were antidilutive.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding in calculating basic earnings per share includes the issuance of 1,135,903, 2,585,329 and 116,715 shares of our common stock for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due to the stock issued in connection with the JEN Transaction in 2010, equity offering in 2009 as described above, exercise of stock options, conversion of restricted stock units, stock units and conversion of 4.50% Notes. Excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are 537,267, 127,995 and 187,671, respectively, restricted shares issued during 2010 and 2008 that are subject to vesting and performance requirements (see Note L). In accordance with ASC 260, nonvested shares are not included in basic earnings per share until the vesting and performance requirements are met.
The following table represents a reconciliation of the net loss and weighted average shares outstanding for the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share – net loss
|
|
$ |
(35,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(28,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted weighted average shares
|
|
|
11,455,466 |
|
|
|
9,306,442 |
|
|
|
8,553,433 |
|
NOTE A - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – continued
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the FASB issued ASC 810. This guidance requires an enterprise to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. ASC 810 requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810 is effective for all variable interest entities and relationships with variable interest entities existing as of January 1, 2010. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2010, which did not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, "Technical Corrections to Various Topics" ("ASU 2010-08"). ASU 2010-08 is the result of the FASB's review of its standards to determine if any provisions are outdated, contain inconsistencies, or need clarifications to reflect the FASB's original intent. The FASB believes the related changes to GAAP are generally nonsubstantive in nature and will not result in pervasive changes to current practice. However, the FASB notes it is possible that the application of the guidance may result in a change to existing practice. ASU 2010-08 provides certain clarifications on embedded derivatives and hedging within ASC Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" ("ASC 815"), which caused a change in the application of that standard with respect to certain embedded derivatives. The clarifications of ASC 815 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to existing contracts (hybrid instruments) containing embedded derivative features at the date of adoption. All other amendments are effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after the date this ASU was issued. The adoption of this accounting update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or related disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, "Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements," (amendments to ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures") which requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. ASU 2010-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. We adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2010. The adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or related disclosures.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations," (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) which specifies that in making the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations, the comparative financial statements presented by public entities should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments also expand the supplemental pro-forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro-forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro-forma revenue and earnings. The amended disclosure requirements are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010, which is January 1, 2011 for us. As the impact of the amendments is to amend the disclosure for business combinations, the adoption of ASU No. 2010-29 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, "Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts," (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) which modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, consideration should be given to whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are consistent with the existing guidance and examples in paragraph 350-20-35-30, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, which is January 1, 2011 for us. Upon adoption of the amendments, assessment should be made of the reporting units with carrying amounts that are zero or negative to determine whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units' goodwill is impaired. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units is impaired, the Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test should be performed for those reporting unit(s). Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings as required by Section 350-20-35. We do not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2010-28 will not have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Net loss and comprehensive loss are the same for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
NOTE B - REAL ESTATE REVENUES
The components of real estate revenues are as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Primary residential
|
|
$ |
14,209 |
|
|
$ |
26,968 |
|
|
$ |
38,217 |
|
Active adult communities
|
|
|
36,949 |
|
|
|
32,604 |
|
|
|
42,491 |
|
Commercial, industrial and other land sales
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
20,165 |
|
Other real estate operations
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
1,337 |
|
Total real estate revenues
|
|
$ |
57,259 |
|
|
$ |
69,104 |
|
|
$ |
102,210 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we realized pre-tax profits of $3,717 on revenues of $4,712 from sales of commercial, industrial and other land. During the year ended December 31, 2009, pre-tax profits from sales of commercial and industrial land were $4,405 on aggregate revenues of $4,758 and pre-tax losses from other land sales were $4,721 on aggregate revenues of $4,067.
On December 11, 2009, Frenchman’s Yacht Club Developers, LLC (“Frenchman’s”), a Florida limited liability company in which our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc. (“Properties”), is the sole member, sold its interest in the proposed development known as Frenchman’s Yacht Club to an unrelated third party for cash and a purchase money note of $4,208. The amount of cash we received did not meet the criteria in authoritative accounting guidance to record this sale under the full accrual method of profit recognition. As a result, this transaction was accounted for under the cost recovery method. Under the cost recovery method, no profit is recognized until cash payments by the buyer, including principal and interest on the purchase money note due to us exceeds the cost of the property sold. In the Frenchman’s transaction, since we sold the property at a loss, in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance we recognized the loss of approximately $3,800 in full. The note receivable was discounted by $1,291 to the fair value for purposes of measuring the loss on this transaction. Additionally, future interest cash receipts is recorded as deferred income, and presented as a reduction to the note receivable until such time that the cumulative cash payments by the buyer exceed Avatar’s book value in the property at the time of sale.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits (loss) from sales of commercial, industrial and other land were ($10,154) on revenues of $20,165. For the year ended December 31, 2008, pre-tax profits from commercial and industrial land were $4,916 on aggregate revenues of $5,785. Pre-tax profits (loss) on sales of other land during the year ended December 31, 2008 were ($20,958) on aggregate revenues of $8,380. During 2008, we closed on the sale of the stock of one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, the sole asset of which was land leased to a third-party that historically generated revenues to Avatar of approximately $600 per annum. Therefore, this sale is classified for financial statement purposes as a sale of other land. Pre-tax profits on the sale were $5,888 on revenues of $6,000.
The pre-tax loss from other land sales during 2008 was primarily attributable to the following transactions as a result of our decision to sell certain land. More specifically, in this period, we entered into two transactions with unaffiliated third parties providing for the formation of LLCs; and we subsequently sold developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly formed LLCs which were not required to be consolidated under authoritative accounting guidance. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. These transactions generated aggregate sales proceeds to Avatar of approximately $7,847 on assets with an aggregate book value of approximately $29,334. We invested approximately $1,626 to acquire equity interests in these LLCs. These transactions generated a pre-tax loss of approximately $21,487.
See “Financial Information Relating to Industry Segments” in Note P.
NOTE C - LAND AND OTHER INVENTORIES
Land and other inventories consist of the following:
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Land developed and in process of development
|
|
$ |
166,569 |
|
|
$ |
136,578 |
|
Land held for future development or sale
|
|
|
134,347 |
|
|
|
98,818 |
|
Homes completed or under construction
|
|
|
24,320 |
|
|
|
27,971 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
$ |
326,710 |
|
|
$ |
264,236 |
|
On June 1, 2010, we acquired approximately 1,064 residential lots in a community known as Tortosa in Maricopa County, Arizona (approximately 35 miles southeast of Phoenix) for a purchase price of $5,683. On August 5, 2010, we acquired 368 residential lots in a planned development known as Turtle Creek located in St. Cloud (Osceola County), Florida for a purchase price of $7,000.
On September 24, 2009, we acquired 87 completed and partially completed homes, 267 developed lots, 364 partially developed lots and approximately 400 undeveloped master planned lots in a residential community located in St. Lucie County, Florida. The purchase price was approximately $7,450. In addition, on December 3, 2009, we acquired 86 developed lots located in Pima County, Arizona. The purchase price was approximately $3,725.
NOTE D – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment and accumulated depreciation consist of the following:
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and improvements
|
|
$ |
26,283 |
|
|
$ |
25,772 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
38,462 |
|
|
|
38,695 |
|
Machinery, equipment and fixtures
|
|
|
13,728 |
|
|
|
13,551 |
|
Amenities construction in progress
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
1,037 |
|
|
|
|
79,537 |
|
|
|
79,055 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(34,023 |
) |
|
|
(31,045 |
) |
|
|
$ |
45,514 |
|
|
$ |
48,010 |
|
Amenities owned by Avatar and which are not held for future transfer to homeowners associations are included in property and equipment. The book values of these amenities (excluding amenities construction in progress) were $43,753 and $44,850 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Depreciation charged to operations during 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $3,091, $3,462 and $3,820, respectively.
NOTE E – POINCIANA PARKWAY
In December 2006, we entered into agreements with Osceola County, Florida and Polk County, Florida for us to develop and construct at our cost a 9.66 mile four-lane road in Osceola and Polk Counties, to be known as the Poinciana Parkway (the "Poinciana Parkway"). The Poinciana Parkway is to include a 4.15 mile segment to be operated as a toll road. We have acquired right-of-way and federal and state environmental permits necessary to construct the Poinciana Parkway. We will need to permit an interchange between the Poinciana Parkway and U.S. 17/92 in Polk County prior to commencing construction of the road. We have obtained an extension of our South Florida Water Management District permit to February 14, 2018. In July 2008 and August 2008, we entered into amended and restated agreements with Osceola County and Polk County. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with Osceola County in December 2010 and the amendment to our agreement with Polk County in October 2010, funding for the Poinciana Parkway is to be obtained by and construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be commenced by February 14, 2012. Pursuant to the amendments to our agreements with both Counties, construction of the Poinciana Parkway is to be completed by May 7, 2014, subject to extension for Force Majeure. We advised the Counties that the current economic downturn has resulted in our inability to: (i) conclude negotiations with potential investors; or (ii) obtain financing for the construction of the Poinciana Parkway.
If funding for the Poinciana Parkway is not obtained and construction of the Poinciana Parkway cannot be commenced by February 14, 2012, the Counties have no right to obtain damages or seek specific performance. Polk County’s sole remedy under its agreement with Avatar is to cancel such agreement if Avatar does not construct the Poinciana Parkway. With respect to Osceola County, if funding and commencement of construction is not met, (i) a portion of Avatar’s land in Osceola County will become subject to Osceola traffic concurrency requirements applicable generally to other home builders in the County and (ii) Avatar will be required to contribute approximately $1,900 towards the construction cost of certain traffic improvements in Osceola County that we otherwise might have been obligated to build or fund if we had not agreed to construct the Poinciana Parkway.
Osceola County and Avatar are still attempting to obtain federal and/or state funds for development of the Poinciana Parkway, including highway tax bill monies, a newly announced federal transportation grant and a federal loan. We cannot predict whether any federal or state funds will be available.
For the Poinciana Parkway, indicators of impairment are general economic conditions, rate of population growth and estimated change in traffic levels. If indicators are present, we perform an impairment test in which the asset is reviewed for impairment by comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the asset to its carrying value. If such cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the carrying value is written down to its estimated fair value. In determining estimated future cash flows for purposes of the impairment test, we incorporate current market assumptions based on general economic conditions such as anticipated estimated revenues and estimated costs. These assumptions can significantly affect our estimates of future cash flows.
NOTE E – POINCIANA PARKWAY - continued
Our estimate of the right-of-way acquisition, development and construction costs for the Poinciana Parkway approximates $175,000 to $200,000. However, no assurance of the ultimate costs can be given at this stage. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $47,449 has been expended. During fiscal years 2009 and 2008, we recorded impairment charges of $8,108 and $30,228, respectively, associated with the Poinciana Parkway.
We review the recoverability of the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway on a quarterly basis in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. Based on our review during 2010, we determined the estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the Poinciana Parkway were greater than its carrying value, therefore no impairment losses were recorded during 2010. Non-capitalizable expenditures of $324 and $341 related to the Poinciana Parkway were expensed during 2010 and 2009, respectively. At December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Poinciana Parkway is $8,452.
NOTE F - ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT LIABILITY FOR SOLD LAND
The estimated development liability consists primarily of utilities improvements in Poinciana and Rio Rico for more than 8,000 homesites previously sold and is summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Gross unexpended costs
|
|
$ |
26,197 |
|
|
$ |
26,389 |
|
Less costs relating to unsold homesites
|
|
|
(5,909 |
) |
|
|
(5,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated development liability for sold land
|
|
$ |
20,288 |
|
|
$ |
20,417 |
|
The estimated development liability for sold land is reduced by actual expenditures and is evaluated and adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect management’s estimate of anticipated costs. In addition, we obtain third-party engineer evaluations and adjust this liability to reflect changes in the estimated costs. We recorded charges of approximately $291, $592 and $710 during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, associated with these obligations. Future increases or decreases of costs for construction material and labor, as well as other land development and utilities infrastructure costs, may have a significant effect on the estimated development liability.
NOTE G – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
GAAP requires a variable interest entity (“VIE”) to be consolidated with a company which is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both of the following characteristics: (a) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Entities determined to be VIEs, for which we are not the primary beneficiary, are accounted for under the equity method.
Avatar’s variable interest in VIEs may be in the form of (1) equity ownership, (2) contracts to purchase assets and/or (3) loans provided by Avatar to a VIE. We examine specific criteria and use judgment when determining if Avatar is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Factors considered in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of other partner(s), voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions, level of economic disproportionality between Avatar and the other partner(s) and contracts to purchase assets from VIEs.
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of acquiring and/or developing land in which we may or may not have a controlling interest. These entities are VIEs and our investments in these entities, along with other arrangements represent variable interests, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement. We analyze these entities when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event.
NOTE G – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES - continued
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
During 2009, we entered into two separate agreements with unrelated third parties providing for the formation of two separate limited liability companies (“LLCs”). We subsequently sold developed, partially-developed and undeveloped land to each of the newly formed companies for a combination of cash and purchase money notes. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and participate in the management of each of the LLCs. We also entered into land option contracts with these newly formed LLCs. Under such land option contracts, we paid a specified option deposit in consideration for the right, but not the obligation, to purchase developed lots in the future at predetermined prices.
We determined that these entities qualify as VIEs which require consolidation by the entity determined to be the primary beneficiary. As a result of our analyses, we hold a variable interest in the VIEs through the purchase money notes, the land option contracts and an economic interest in these LLCs. As of December 31, 2010, our consolidated balance sheets include $3,440 in land and other inventories and $1,116 in property and equipment from these LLCs. As of December 31, 2009, our consolidated balance sheets include $4,386 in land and other inventories and $1,161 in property and equipment from these LLC’s.
Avatar and its equity partners make initial or ongoing capital contributions to these consolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make capital contributions is governed by each consolidated entity’s respective operating agreement.
As of December 31, 2010, these consolidated entities were financed by partner equity and do not have third-party debt. In addition, we have not provided any guarantees to these entities or our equity partners.
Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
We participate in entities with equity interests ranging from 20% to 50% for the purpose of acquiring and/or developing land in which we do not have a controlling interest. We analyze these entities when they are entered into or upon a reconsideration event. All of such entities in which we had an equity interest at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are accounted for under the equity method.
Avatar shares in the profits and losses of these unconsolidated entities generally in accordance with its ownership interests. Avatar and its equity partners make initial or ongoing capital contributions to these unconsolidated entities on a pro rata basis. The obligation to make capital contributions is governed by each unconsolidated entity’s respective operating agreement.
During 2009 and 2008, we entered into various transactions with unaffiliated third parties providing for the formation of LLCs; and we subsequently sold developed and partially-developed land to each of the newly-formed LLCs. We acquired a minority ownership interest in each of the LLCs and share in the management of each of the LLCs. Avatar made contributions totaling $143, $42 and $1,626 to its unconsolidated entities during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of December 31, 2010, these unconsolidated entities were financed by partner equity and do not have third-party debt. In addition, we have not provided any guarantees to these entities or our equity partners.
NOTE G – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES - continued
The following are the consolidated condensed balance sheets of our unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
465 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
Land and other inventory
|
|
|
11,574 |
|
|
|
11,573 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
12,123 |
|
|
$ |
11,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
Notes and interest payable to Avatar
|
|
|
3,724 |
|
|
|
3,724 |
|
Partners’ Capital of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avatar
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
1,597 |
|
Equity partner
|
|
|
5,481 |
|
|
|
5,627 |
|
Total liabilities and partners’ capital
|
|
$ |
12,123 |
|
|
$ |
11,841 |
|
The following are the consolidated condensed statements of operations of our unconsolidated entities for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
507 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
2,041 |
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
17,571 |
|
Net loss from unconsolidated entities
|
|
$ |
(706 |
) |
|
$ |
(566 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,530 |
) |
Avatar’s share of loss from unconsolidated entities
|
|
$ |
(276 |
) |
|
$ |
(196 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,812 |
) |
NOTE H - NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt are summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes, due 2024
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
|
$ |
64,804 |
|
Unamortized discounts
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
Net Carrying Amount
|
|
$ |
64,445 |
|
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
Equity Component
|
|
$ |
13,737 |
|
|
$ |
13,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% Note payable, due 2011
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
6% Note payable, due 2012
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Total Corporate
|
|
$ |
76,445 |
|
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% Term Bonds payable, due 2010
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
Amended Unsecured Credit Facility, due 2010
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
55,881 |
|
Construction loan, prime plus 2%, minimum 6%, due 2011
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Promissory Note Payable, due 2011
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
55,992 |
|
Corporate
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes
On March 30, 2004, we issued $120,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the 4.50% Notes) in a private offering. Interest is payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1. The 4.50% Notes are senior, unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future unsecured and senior indebtedness. However, the 4.50% Notes are effectively subordinated to all of our existing and future secured debt to the extent of the collateral securing such indebtedness, and to all existing and future liabilities of our subsidiaries.
Each $1 in principal amount of the 4.50% Notes is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $52.63, or 19.0006 shares of our common stock, upon the satisfaction of one of the following conditions: a) during any calendar quarter (but only during such calendar quarter) commencing after June 30, 2004 if the closing sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter is more than 120% of the conversion price per share of common stock on such last day; or b) during the five business day period after any five-consecutive-trading-day period in which the trading price per $1 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for each day of that period was less than 98% of the product of the closing sale price for our common stock for each day of that period and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of $1 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes, provided that if on the date of any such conversion that is on or after April 1, 2019, the closing sale price of Avatar’s common stock is greater than the conversion price, then holders will receive, in lieu of common stock based on the conversion price, cash or common stock or a combination thereof, at our option, with a value equal to the principal amount of the 4.50% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, as of the conversion date. The closing price of Avatar’s common stock exceeded 120% ($63.156) of the conversion price for 20 trading days out of 30 consecutive trading days as of the last trading day of the fourth quarter of 2006, as of the last trading day of the first quarter of 2007 and as of the last trading day of the second quarter of 2007. Therefore, the 4.50% Notes became convertible for the quarter beginning January 1, 2007, for the quarter beginning April 1, 2007 and for the quarter beginning July 1, 2007. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, the closing price of Avatar’s common stock did not exceed 120% ($63.156) of the conversion price for 20 trading days out of 30 consecutive trading days; therefore, the 4.50% Notes were not convertible during 2010, 2009 and 2008. During 2007, $200 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes were converted into 3,800 shares of Avatar common stock. During 2007, Avatar repurchased $5,000 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $4,984 including accrued interest. During 2008, we repurchased $35,920 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $28,112 including accrued interest. During 2009, we repurchased $14,076 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes for approximately $11,696 including accrued interest. As of December 31, 2010, $64,804 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes remained outstanding. On February 4, 2011, we purchased $17,765 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes; and as of March 16, 2011, $47,039 principal amount remains outstanding.
NOTE H - NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT - continued
We may, at our option, redeem for cash all or a portion of the 4.50% Notes at any time on or after April 5, 2011. Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019; or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 4.50% Notes, holders may require us to purchase all or a portion of their 4.50% Notes. In each case, we will pay a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Subtopic 470-20, Debt with Conversion Options – Cash Conversion (“ASC 470-20”), requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash on conversion to separately account for the liability (debt) and equity (conversion option) components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. ASC 470-20 requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount and the debt issuance costs are amortized to interest cost using the interest method over the expected life of a similar liability that does not have an associated equity component.
The discount on the liability component of the 4.50% Notes is amortized using the effective interest method based on an effective rate of 7.5%, which was the estimated market interest rate for similar debt without a conversion option on the issuance date. The discount is amortized from the issuance date in 2004 through April 1, 2011, the first date that holders of the 4.50% Notes can require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes. As of December 31, 2010, the remaining expected life over which the unamortized discount will be recognized is less than one year. We recognized $1,435, $1,549 and $2,665 in non-cash interest charges related to the amortization of the discount during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
JEN Transaction Notes
In conjunction with the JEN Transaction, we entered into two separate note payable agreements with JEN. Each note is for $6,000 bearing interest at 6% with maturity dates of October 25, 2011 and October 25, 2012.
NOTE H - NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT - continued
Issuance of 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes subsequent to December 31, 2010
On January 31, 2011, Avatar and Avatar Properties Inc. (“API”), entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with Barclays Capital Inc. (the “Underwriter”). Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, Avatar agreed to issue and sell to the Underwriter, and the Underwriter agreed to purchase for sale in an underwritten public offering, $100,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2016 (the “7.50% Notes”). The 7.50% Notes were sold to the Underwriter at 95.75% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, and were sold to the public at a purchase price of 100% of the principal amount of the 7.50% Notes, plus accrued interest, if any, from February 4, 2011.
The Underwriting Agreement includes customary representations, warranties, conditions to closing, and covenants. The Underwriting Agreement also provides for customary indemnification by each of Avatar, API and the Underwriter against certain liabilities. The 7.50% Notes are governed by a Base Indenture and Supplemental Indenture (in each case, as defined below), the principal terms of which are discussed below.
The sale of the 7.50% Notes is registered pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-161498), filed by Avatar with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 21, 2009 (the “Registration Statement”). Net proceeds to Avatar from the sale of the 7.50% Notes is approximately $95,350 after deducting the Underwriter’s discount of 4.25% and expenses estimated at approximately $400. Avatar intends to use the proceeds from the sale of the 7.50% Notes for general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, the repayment of debt, including Avatar’s 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the “4.50% Notes”), which notes may be put to Avatar pursuant to the terms thereof on each of April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014, and April 1, 2019, or called by Avatar at any time on or after April 5, 2011, and potential new acquisitions of real estate and real estate-related assets. On February 4, 2011, we purchased $17,765 principal amount of the 4.50% Notes; and as of March 16, 2011, $47,039 principal amount remains outstanding.
The 7.50% Notes are governed by a base indenture (the “Base Indenture”) and first supplemental indenture (the “Supplemental Indenture,” and together with the Base Indenture, the “Indenture”), both dated as of February 4, 2011, between Avatar and Wilmington Trust FSB, as trustee, and include the following terms:
Interest: Interest on the 7.50% Notes is 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on February 15 and August 15 of each year, beginning on August 15, 2011.
Conversion: Holders may convert the 7.50% Notes into shares of Avatar’s common stock at any time on or prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. The 7.50% Notes are convertible at an initial conversion rate of 33.3333 shares of common stock per $1 principal amount of the 7.50% Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $30.00 per share). The conversion rate, and thus the conversion price, may be adjusted under certain circumstances, including upon the occurrence of a “non-stock change of control” as such term is defined in the Indenture. Upon any conversion, subject to certain exceptions, holders will not receive any cash payment representing accrued and unpaid interest.
NOTE H - NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT - continued
Financial covenants: The Indenture includes the following financial covenants:
|
·
|
until February 15, 2014, Avatar will maintain, at all times, cash and cash equivalents of not less than $20,000;
|
|
·
|
until the second anniversary of the original issuance date of the 7.50% Notes, Avatar’s total consolidated indebtedness (as “indebtedness” is defined in the Indenture) may not exceed $150,000 at any time excluding, for purposes of this covenant, until April 5, 2011, Avatar’s outstanding 4.50% Notes;
|
|
·
|
until the second anniversary of the original issuance date of the 7.50% Notes, Avatar’s total consolidated indebtedness (as “indebtedness” is defined in the Indenture) shall not exceed $50,000 at any time, excluding for purposes of this covenant: (a) the 7.50% Notes, (b) any indebtedness with a maturity date after February 15, 2014, which indebtedness does not provide the holder with a unilateral put right prior to February 15, 2014 and (c) until April 5, 2011, amounts outstanding under Avatar’s 4.50% Notes.
|
Repurchase Right: Holders of the 7.50% Notes have the right to require Avatar to repurchase the Notes on February 15, 2014; or upon the occurrence of a breach of any of the financial covenants, a “fundamental change” (as defined in the Indenture), or an event of default (as described in the Indenture).
Redemption Right: Avatar may, at any time on or after February 15, 2014, at its option, redeem for cash all or any portion of the outstanding 7.50% Notes, but only if the last reported sale price of Avatar’s common stock for 20 or more trading days in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day before the date Avatar provides the notice of redemption to holders exceeds 130% of the conversion price in effect on each such trading day and certain other conditions described in the Indenture are met.
Real Estate
On March 27, 2008, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, by and among our wholly-owned subsidiary, Avatar Properties Inc., as borrower, Wachovia Bank, National Association (as a lender and as administrative agent on behalf of the lenders), and certain financial institutions as lenders (the “Amended Unsecured Credit Facility”). This agreement amended and restated the Credit Agreement, dated as of September 20, 2005, as amended.
On May 3, 2010, we paid in full the outstanding principal and accrued interest of $55,979 under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. In addition, on May 4, 2010, we deposited $22,042 with Wells Fargo, N.A., successor by merger with Wachovia Bank, N.A., to collateralize letters of credit. In connection with such payment and deposit, we notified our administrative agent that we were exercising our right to reduce our commitment amount under the facility to zero dollars ($0), which had the effect of terminating all parties’ obligations under the credit facility, effective as of May 17, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $7,840 remains deposited to collateralize outstanding letters of credit.
As of December 31, 2010, we have approximately $501 outstanding from secured obligations related to the JEN Transaction. On October 25, 2010, we entered into an agreement with Mutual of Omaha Bank whereby Avatar became the Substitute Guarantor under a $3,000 construction loan facility made by Mutual of Omaha to Joseph Carl Homes, LLC (now known as Avatar Properties of Arizona, LLC) and JCH Group, LLC. This construction loan facility bears interest at prime plus 2% with a minimum floor of 6%. The maturity date of this facility is May 12, 2011. As of December 31, 2010, $396 was outstanding. As of December 31, 2010, the interest rate on this facility was 6%. In addition, we have notes payable of $105 to the seller of 7 lots secured by deeds of trust that are non-interest bearing with principal maturity due at the earlier of March 2011 and June 2011 or the closing of the lot by a third party.
In conjunction with the acquisition of developed land in Florida in September 2005 and September 2004, we assumed approximately $5,900 of Community Development District term bond obligations due 2010. These term bonds are secured by the land and bear an interest rate of 5.50%. The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $111.
NOTE H - NOTES, MORTGAGE NOTES AND OTHER DEBT – continued
Maturities of notes, mortgage notes and other debt at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2011
|
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
6,612 |
|
2012
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
2013
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2014
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2015
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
64,804 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,804 |
(1) |
Less discount
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
$ |
76,445 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
77,057 |
|
(1) Holders may require us to repurchase the 4.50% Notes for cash on April 1, 2011, April 1, 2014 and April 1, 2019; or in certain circumstances involving a designated event, as defined in the indenture for the 4.50% Notes; ;or we may call the 4.50% Notes at any time on or after April 5, 2011.
The following table represents interest incurred, interest capitalized, and interest expense for 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Interest incurred
|
|
$ |
5,681 |
|
|
$ |
7,191 |
|
|
$ |
8,742 |
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(4,460 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
$ |
5,531 |
|
|
$ |
6,857 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
We made interest payments of $3,572, $5,035 and $5,759 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
NOTE I – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
We have a defined contribution savings plan that covers substantially all employees. Under this savings plan, we contribute to the plan based upon specified percentages of employees' voluntary contributions. Our contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $0, $0 and $154, respectively. Our Board of Directors determined to not effect a matching contribution during 2010 and 2009.
NOTE J - LEASE COMMITMENTS
We lease the majority of our administration and sales offices under operating leases that expire at varying times through 2013. Rental expense for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $1,086, $1,390 and $1,542, respectively. Minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2010 were as follows: 2011 - $1,562; 2012 - $1,154; 2013 - $958; 2014 - $722; 2015 - $0; thereafter -$0.
NOTE K - ACCRUED AND OTHER LIABILITIES
Accrued and other liabilities are summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Property taxes and assessments
|
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
Contract retention
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,246 |
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
$ |
6,929 |
|
|
$ |
5,293 |
|
NOTE L – SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS AND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement), as amended, (“the Incentive Plan”) provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards, and stock units to officers, employees and directors of Avatar. The exercise prices of stock options may not be less than the stock exchange closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock option awards under the Incentive Plan generally expire 10 years after the date of grant.
As of December 31, 2010, an aggregate of 148,293 shares of our Common Stock, subject to certain adjustments, were reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan, including an aggregate of 139,842 options, restricted stock units and stock units granted. There were 8,451 shares available for grant at December 31, 2010.
During 2010, 490,000 restricted shares were granted and issued of which 10,000 shares vested. During 2008, Avatar amended the performance conditioned restricted stock unit agreements, previously granted to certain employees, which converted into an equal number of shares of restricted common stock of Avatar. This modification resulted in $1,089 of share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”). Each employee made an Internal Revenue Code Section 83(b) election (the “Section 83(b) election”) with respect to all the shares of restricted stock; Avatar agreed to vest 107,229 shares of restricted stock having a value approximately equal to the tax withholding amount required as a result of the Section 83(b) election, at the minimum statutory withholding rates applicable to the employee, and such shares were withheld by Avatar. Avatar then issued 187,671 shares of restricted stock during 2008. The terms, conditions and restrictions of the restricted stock, including the vesting and forfeiture provisions, under the amended agreements are otherwise substantially the same as those that were applicable under the restricted stock unit agreements except that each employee, as an owner of this restricted stock, generally has the rights of an Avatar common stockholder, including voting and dividend rights (except that dividends on unvested shares of restricted stock generally are forfeited unless such shares ultimately vest). During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, previously restricted stock of 70,728 and 59,676 shares, respectively, vested. As of December 31, 2010, there are 537,267 shares of restricted stock that are considered legally outstanding but are not considered outstanding for accounting purposes until the vesting conditions are satisfied in accordance with ASC 718.
Compensation expense related to share-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $1,352, $2,035 and $3,905, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for share-based compensation during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0, $0 and $1,500, respectively.
Cash received from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0, $0 and $500, respectively. The additional tax benefit related to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock units during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0, $0 and $920, respectively, which is reflected as an increase to additional paid in capital.
Under ASC 718, the fair value of awards of restricted stock and units which do not contain a specified hurdle price condition is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Under ASC 718, the fair value of restricted stock awards which contain a specified hurdle price condition is estimated on the grant date using the Monte-Carlo option valuation model (like a lattice model). Under ASC 718, the fair value of each stock option is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The valuation models require assumptions and estimates to determine expected volatility, expected life, expected dividend yield and expected risk-free interest rates. The expected volatility was determined using historical volatility of our stock based on the contractual life of the award. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury strips at the award grant date. We also used historical data to estimate forfeiture experience.
NOTE L – SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS AND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION - continued
The significant weighted average assumptions used for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
Volatility rate
|
|
|
42.70%-49.50 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
0.35%-1.24 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
1.0-5.2 |
|
|
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
N/A |
* |
Weighted average fair value of units granted
|
|
$ |
14.23 |
|
|
$ |
17.44 |
|
|
$ |
35.54 |
|
*Not applicable since no stock options or restricted stock awards with specified hurdle price condition as discussed above were granted during 2009 and 2008.
A summary of the status of the stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is presented below:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
136,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
156,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
(26,102 |
) |
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
136,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
Exercisable at end of period
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
|
|
136,102 |
|
|
$ |
25.00 |
|
The weighted average remaining contractual life of stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2010 was 2.2 years. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0, $0 and $121, respectively.
A summary of the restricted stock and stock units activity for the year ended December 31, 2010 is presented below:
|
|
Restricted Stock and Stock Units
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
172,275 |
|
|
$ |
28.75 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
498,935 |
|
|
$ |
14.23 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(89,758 |
) |
|
$ |
27.05 |
|
Expired/Forfeited
|
|
|
(32,100 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
20.96 |
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
549,352 |
|
|
$ |
28.75 |
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 537,267 shares restricted stock issued that are considered legally outstanding but are not considered outstanding for accounting purposes until the vesting conditions are satisfied in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance.
|
NOTE L – SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS AND OTHER EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION - continued
As of December 31, 2010, there was $6,658 of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years. As of December 31, 2010, there was no unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options.
Under a deferral program, non-management directors may elect to defer up to 50% of annual retainer fees, committee fees and/or chairperson fees, for which the director is credited with a number of stock units based upon the closing price of Avatar’s common stock on the due date of each payment. The number of stock units become distributable as shares of common stock upon the earlier of a date designated by the individual director or the date of the individual’s separation from service as a director. Stock units of 0, 3,049 and 0 shares were distributed to non-management directors during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The outstanding balance of stock units as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was 17,757, 11,895 and 9,429, respectively.
NOTE M - INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(34,248 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,503 |
) |
State
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total current
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(34,248 |
) |
|
|
(21,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
(9,392 |
) |
State
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
Total deferred
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(10,962 |
) |
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
(375 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,860 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,465 |
) |
On November 6, 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 was enacted into law and amended Section 172 of the Internal Revenue Code to extend the permitted carryback period for offsetting certain net operating losses (NOLs) against earnings for up to five years. Due to this enacted federal tax legislation, Avatar carried back its 2009 NOL against earnings it generated in the five previous years. As a result, Avatar received a federal tax refund of $33,627 during 2010.
NOTE M - INCOME TAXES – continued
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax over book basis of land inventory
|
|
$ |
13,824 |
|
|
$ |
12,586 |
|
Unrecoverable land development costs
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
Executive incentive compensation
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
Net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
14,026 |
|
|
|
5,416 |
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
15,196 |
|
|
|
15,304 |
|
Other
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
Total deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
46,105 |
|
|
|
37,330 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(22,522 |
) |
|
|
(10,419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
23,583 |
|
|
|
26,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book over tax income recognized on sale of the Ocala Property
|
|
|
(21,925 |
) |
|
|
(24,355 |
) |
Tax over book on 4.50% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
(1,522 |
) |
Book over tax basis of depreciable assets
|
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(762 |
) |
Restricted stock
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
(23,583 |
) |
|
|
(26,911 |
) |
Net deferred income tax asset (liability)
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During the year ended December 31, 2010 we recognized an increase of $12,103 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2010, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $22,522. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
In 2006, we closed on substantially all of the land sold under the threat of condemnation, and in 2007 we closed on the remainder. We believe these transactions entitled us to defer the payment of income taxes of $24,355 from the gain on these sales. During October 2009, we received from the Internal Revenue Service a final extension until December 31, 2010 to obtain replacement property to defer the entire payment of income taxes. As a result of the property acquisitions during 2009 and 2010 including the JEN Transaction, we believe the properties acquired will satisfy the required replacement property; however, we are uncertain as to the final determination. If it is determined that we have not acquired a sufficient amount of replacement property, we may be required to make an income tax payment plus interest on the portion determined not to have been replaced as of December 31, 2010.
The exercise of share-based compensation during 2010, 2009 and 2008 generated additional income tax benefits of $0, $0 and $920, respectively, which is reflected as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
NOTE M - INCOME TAXES – continued
A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) to the expected income tax expense (benefit) at the federal statutory rate of 35% for each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense computed at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
(12,419 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,645 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,819 |
) |
State income tax (benefit) expense, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
(2,093 |
) |
|
|
(4,820 |
) |
Adjustment to 2009 net operating loss carryback
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
|
|
12,103 |
|
|
|
(9,148 |
) |
|
|
19,567 |
|
Reduction of valuation allowance due to adoption of ASC 470-20
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
Other
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(420 |
) |
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
$ |
(375 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,860 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,465 |
) |
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, we received income tax payment refunds of approximately $33,627, $21,356 and $3,924, respectively, related to taxable losses generated during 2009, 2008 and over payment of 2007 taxes, respectively.
NOTE N – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in various pending litigation matters primarily arising in the normal course of our business. These cases are in various procedural stages. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined, Avatar believes it is probable in accordance with ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, that certain claims may result in costs and expenses estimated at approximately $165 and $334, which have been accrued in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Liabilities or costs arising out of these and other currently pending litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Performance bonds, issued by third party entities, are used primarily to guarantee our performance to construct improvements in our various communities. As of December 31, 2010, we had outstanding performance bonds of approximately $9,007. We do not believe that it is likely any of these outstanding performance bonds will be drawn upon.
NOTE O - OTHER MATTERS
At our communities of Solivita and Solivita West, tax-exempt bond financing is utilized to fund and manage portions of public infrastructure consisting primarily of stormwater management facilities, drainage works, irrigation facilities, and water and wastewater utilities. The bonds were issued by the Poinciana Community Development District and Poinciana West Community Development District (the “CDDs”), independent special-purpose units of county government, established and operating in accordance with Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes. The bonds are serviced by non-ad valorem special assessments levied on certain developable and developed property within Solivita and Solivita West, and the assessments constitute a liability against the developable and developed property and are intended to secure the CDDs’ ability to meet bond servicing obligations. In accordance with EITF 91-10, Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment Financing, we record and pay the assessments on parcels owned by Avatar when such assessments are fixed and determinable. The assessments are not a liability of Avatar or any other landowner within the CDDs but are obligations secured by the land. For the developable and developed parcels Avatar owns within the CDDs, Avatar pays the assessments until such parcels are sold. After a sale by Avatar, Avatar no longer pays the assessments on the parcel sold and any future assessments become the responsibility of the new owner and its successors in title until the bonds are paid in full.
NOTE P - FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO INDUSTRY SEGMENTS
In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), our current real estate operations include the following segments: the development, sale and management of active adult communities; the development and sale of primary residential communities; and the sale of commercial, industrial or other land. In accordance with ASC 280, our title insurance agency does not qualify as a separate reportable segment and is included in “Other Operations”.
The following tables summarize our information for reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
$ |
36,949 |
|
|
$ |
32,604 |
|
|
$ |
42,491 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
14,209 |
|
|
|
26,968 |
|
|
|
38,217 |
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
8,825 |
|
|
|
20,165 |
|
Other operations
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,537 |
|
|
|
|
57,355 |
|
|
|
69,392 |
|
|
|
102,410 |
|
Unallocated revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
Gain on repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
59,138 |
|
|
$ |
73,501 |
|
|
$ |
110,366 |
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
$ |
(5,043 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,613 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,725 |
) |
Primary residential
|
|
|
(6,284 |
) |
|
|
(8,103 |
) |
|
|
(43,133 |
) |
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
(10,154 |
) |
Other operations
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
(7,223 |
) |
|
|
(13,821 |
) |
|
|
(60,005 |
) |
Unallocated income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,453 |
|
Gain on repurchase of 4.50% Notes
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
5,286 |
|
Equity loss from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(7,812 |
) |
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(20,508 |
) |
|
|
(19,694 |
) |
|
|
(22,388 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
(5,531 |
) |
|
|
(6,857 |
) |
|
|
(4,282 |
) |
Other real estate expenses
|
|
|
(3,099 |
) |
|
|
(3,688 |
) ) |
|
|
(8,424 |
) |
Impairment of the Poinciana Parkway
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,108 |
) |
|
|
(30,228 |
) |
Impairment of land developed or held for future development
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11,919 |
) |
|
|
(16,941 |
) |
Loss before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(36,057 |
) |
|
$ |
(61,843 |
) |
|
$ |
(142,341 |
) |
NOTE P - FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO INDUSTRY SEGMENTS – continued
|
|
December 31
|
|
Assets:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active adult communities
|
|
$ |
184,656 |
|
|
$ |
118,883 |
|
Primary residential
|
|
|
88,466 |
|
|
|
96,965 |
|
Commercial and industrial and other land sales
|
|
|
10,587 |
|
|
|
11,568 |
|
Poinciana Parkway
|
|
|
8,452 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
Unallocated assets
|
|
|
253,290 |
|
|
|
358,821 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
545,451 |
|
|
$ |
594,719 |
|
(a)
|
Our businesses are primarily conducted in the United States.
|
(b)
|
Identifiable assets by segment are those assets that are used in the operations of each segment.
|
(c)
|
No significant part of the business is dependent upon a single customer or group of customers.
|
(d)
|
The caption “Unallocated assets” under the table depicting the segment assets represents the following as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively: cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $114,555 and $215,514; land inventories of $122,929 and $92,370 (a majority of which is bulk land); property and equipment of $1,180 and $2,188; investment in and notes from unconsolidated entities of $5,193 and $5,321; receivables of $6,427 and $41,492; and prepaid expenses and other assets of $3,006 and $1,936. None of the foregoing are directly attributable to a reportable segment in accordance with ASC 280.
|
(e)
|
There is no interest expense from active adult communities, primary residential, and commercial, industrial and other land sales included in segment operating income/(loss) for 2010, 2009 and 2008.
|
(f)
|
Included in segment operating profit/(loss) for 2010 is depreciation expense of $2,282, $552 and $257 from active adult, primary residential communities and unallocated corporate/other, respectively. Included in segment operating profit/(loss) for 2009 is depreciation expense of $2,301, $859 and $302 from active adult, primary residential communities and unallocated corporate/other, respectively. Included in segment operating profit/(loss) for 2008 is depreciation expense of $2,315, $1,476 and $29 from active adult, primary residential communities and unallocated corporate/other, respectively. Included in segment operating profit/(loss) for 2008 is depreciation expense of $2,315, $1,476 and $29 from active adult, primary residential communities and unallocated corporate/other, respectively.
|
(g)
|
During fiscal year 2010, impairment losses of approximately $408 and $252 reduced the carrying value of the assets of active adult and primary residential communities, respectively. During fiscal year 2009, impairment losses of approximately $371 and $1,449 reduced the carrying value of the assets of active adult and primary residential communities, respectively. In addition, impairment losses of approximately $8,108 and approximately $11,919 reduce the carrying values of Poinciana Parkway and land developed or held for future development (which is currently not allocated to a reportable segment), respectively. During fiscal year 2008, impairment losses of approximately $625 and $34,332 reduced the carrying value of the assets of active adult and primary residential communities, respectively. In addition, impairment losses of approximately $30,228 and approximately $16,941 reduce the carrying values of Poinciana Parkway and land developed or held for future development (which is currently not allocated to a reportable segment), respectively.
|
NOTE Q - FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, expands disclosures about fair value measurements, and establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
FASB ASC 820-10-65, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall – Transition and Open Effective Date Information provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent with the principles presented in ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures - Overall. This topic provides additional authoritative guidance in determining whether a market is active or inactive, and whether a transaction is distressed; is applicable to all assets and liabilities (i.e. financial and nonfinancial); and requires enhanced disclosures.
The accounting standards require that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
|
Level 1:
|
Fair value determined based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
|
|
Level 2:
|
Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or other means.
|
|
Level 3:
|
Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as discounted cash flows, or similar techniques.
|
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximates the fair value due to their short-term maturities.
The majority of our non-financial instruments, which include land and other inventories, Poinciana Parkway and property and equipment, are not required to be carried at fair value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur such that a non-financial instrument is required to be evaluated for impairment, a resulting asset impairment would require that the non-financial instrument be recorded at the lower of historical cost or its fair value.
Avatar’s assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2010 and losses for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:
Non-financial Assets/Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes completed or under construction
|
|
Level 2
|
|
$ |
5,399 |
|
|
$ |
456 |
|
Earn-out liability
|
|
Level 3
|
|
$ |
4,388 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
We estimated the fair value of the earn-out using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. This fair value measurement is based on a discounted cash flow and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. As of December 31, 2010, there were no significant changes in the range of outcomes of the earn-out compared to the acquisition date. As of December 31, 2010, the earn-out liability increased to $4,388 as a result of an increase in Avatar’s stock price as of December 31, 2010 compared to the acquisition date.
NOTE Q - FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES - continued
The carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
115,502 |
|
|
$ |
115,502 |
|
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
|
$ |
217,132 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
$ |
8,422 |
|
|
$ |
8,422 |
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$ |
6,434 |
|
|
$ |
6,434 |
|
|
$ |
6,656 |
|
|
$ |
6,656 |
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
$ |
1,766 |
|
|
$ |
1,766 |
|
|
$ |
35,018 |
|
|
$ |
35,018 |
|
Notes, mortgage notes and other debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% Notes
|
|
$ |
64,445 |
|
|
$ |
64,966 |
|
|
$ |
63,010 |
|
|
$ |
61,969 |
|
6% Notes payable
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% Term Bonds payable
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
Amended Unsecured Credit Facility
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
55,881 |
|
|
$ |
54,750 |
|
Construction loan
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Promissory Note Payable
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
In estimating the fair value of financial instruments, we used the following methods and assumptions:
Cash and cash equivalents and Restricted cash: The carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximates their fair value.
Receivables, net and Income tax receivable: The carrying amount reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables, net and income tax receivable approximates their fair value.
4.50% Notes: At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value of the 4.50% Notes is estimated, based on quoted or estimated market prices.
Real Estate Notes Payable: The fair values of the 6% notes payable, Amended Unsecured Credit Facility and construction loan as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying values for the 5.50% term bonds payable and the promissory note payable approximates their fair value.
NOTE R - QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial data for 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
2010 Quarter
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
9,623 |
|
|
$ |
17,302 |
|
|
$ |
9,573 |
|
|
$ |
22,640 |
|
Expenses
|
|
|
19,802 |
|
|
|
23,067 |
|
|
|
19,488 |
|
|
|
32,562 |
|
Equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(10,269 |
) |
|
|
(5,882 |
) |
|
|
(10,039 |
) |
|
|
(9,867 |
) |
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(10,136 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,743 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,519 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,710 |
) |
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.90 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.51 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.84 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.81 |
) |
|
|
2009 Quarter
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
15,347 |
|
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
|
$ |
18,252 |
|
|
$ |
20,547 |
|
Expenses
|
|
|
24,709 |
|
|
|
29,046 |
|
|
|
27,613 |
|
|
|
53,780 |
|
Equity earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(9,424 |
) |
|
|
(9,777 |
) |
|
|
(9,428 |
) |
|
|
(33,214 |
) |
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
31,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(8,594 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,777 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,811 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,801 |
) |
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.99 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
1.
|
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share amounts for the quarters may not agree with the per share amounts for the year.
|
|
2.
|
During the fourth quarter of 2009, our impairment evaluation resulted in impairment charges of $19,839, which included $260 in impairment charges for homes completed or under construction, $11,919 in impairment charges for land developed and/or held for future development and $7,660 for the Poinciana Parkway.
|
|
3.
|
During the fourth quarter of 2009, we decreased the deferred tax valuation allowance by $9,253 due to new federal tax legislation, which results in our ability to carry back 2009 NOLs to prior years.
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
|
None.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we have determined that, during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
See Part I - Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” and the “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”, as they relate to internal control over financial reporting, incorporated herein by reference.
None.
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatar’s definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 30, 2011, except for the information regarding the executive officers of Avatar, which information is included in Part I of this Annual Report under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant.”
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatar's definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 30, 2011.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatar's definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 30, 2011.
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatar's definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 30, 2011.
|
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference to Avatar's definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 30, 2011.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
(a)(1)
|
Financial Statements and Schedules:
|
See Item 8. "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this report.
|
(a)(2)
|
Financial Statements Schedules:
|
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Schedules other than those listed above are omitted, since the information required is not applicable or is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits:
3.1 |
|
* |
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated May 28, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
* |
|
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated May 26, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
* |
|
Amended and Restated By-laws as of March 5, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
* |
|
Indenture, dated March 30, 2004, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, in respect of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
* |
|
Indenture, dated February 4, 2011, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
* |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 4, 2011, between Avatar Holdings Inc., and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
* |
|
Global Note in the principal sum of $100,000,000, dated February 4, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
*1 |
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February 19, 1999, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10(s) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
*1 |
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-63278), filed on June 19, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules – continued
|
10.4
|
|
*1
|
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (50,000 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (23,700 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (20,000 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (15,000 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (16,300 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
*1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
*1
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
*1
|
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
*1
|
|
2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-Kdated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules – continued
|
10.17 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
*1 |
|
2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @ $65.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @ $72.50), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @ $80.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
*1 |
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2005, among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
*1 |
|
2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @ $65.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @ $72.50), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @ $80.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
*1 |
|
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for Non-Employee Directors' Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 13, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
*1 |
|
First Amendment, dated as of September 28, 2005, to the 2005 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
*1 |
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules – continued
|
10.31
|
|
*
|
|
Option Agreement, dated October 20, 2006, between Avatar Properties Inc. and The Nature Conservancy (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amendment to the 2005 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael F. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael F. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36
|
|
*1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(bx) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(by) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38
|
|
*1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2006, among Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(bz) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
*
|
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006 by and between Osceola County, Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10(ca) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
*
|
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006 by and between Polk County, Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10(cb) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
*1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42
|
|
*1
|
|
Amendment to Avatar Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 4, 2007 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43
|
|
*
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 27, 2008, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc. (as Guarantor), Avatar Properties Inc. (as Borrower), Wachovia Bank, National Association (as Administrative Agent and Lender), and certain financial institutions as lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules – continued
|
10.44 |
|
* |
|
Second Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2008, executed on behalf of Avatar Holdings Inc. ("Guarantor") in favor of the lending institution(s) identified therein and Wachovia Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @ $80.86), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @ $84.71), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @ $88.56), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
* |
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.49 |
|
* |
|
Transportation Concurrency Agreement, dated December 15, 2006, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
* |
|
Amendment to Transportation Concurrency Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.51 |
|
* |
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Polk County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 11, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.52 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia K. Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.55 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated 2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules – continued
|
10.57 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.58 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated 2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.59 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia K. Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.61 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500 Units; hurdle price condition: $80.86) (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.62 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500 Units; hurdle price condition $84.71) (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500 Units; hurdle price condition $88.56) (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for Non-Employee Directors' Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.97 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.65 |
|
*1 |
|
Compensation of certain named executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.66 |
|
* |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2009, by and among Avatar Properties Inc. (“Borrower”), Avatar Holdings Inc., (“Guarantor”), the several lenders from time to time parties thereto (“Lenders”), and Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Agent” and “Lender”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 26, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.67 |
|
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated September 23, 2009, between Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., Frenchman’s Yacht Club Developers, LLC and Barclays Capital Inc., (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K dated September 23, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.68 |
|
*1 |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher, dated October 26, 2009 (filed Exhibit 10.84 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
*1 |
|
Separation and Release Agreement, between Avatar Properties Inc., and Jonathan Fels, dated December 29, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.85 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules – continued
|
10.70
|
|
*
|
|
Guaranty Agreement dated May 18, 2010, executed on behalf of Avatar Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.71
|
|
*
|
|
Continuing Letter of Credit Agreement dated May 18, 2010, executed on behalf of Avatar Properties Inc., a Florida corporation, and Avatar Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in favor of Wells Fargo, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K darted May 24 ,2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
*
|
|
Security Agreement dated May 18, 2010, executed on behalf of Avatar Properties Inc., a Florida corporation, and Avatar Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.73
|
|
*1
|
|
Director Compensation (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
*1
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated May 6, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 25, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 25, 2010 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated August 25, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated August 25, 2010 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.77
|
|
1
|
|
Separation Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.78
|
|
1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jon M. Donnell (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., and Carl Mulac (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.80
|
|
|
|
Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Properties Inc., Terra West Communities LLC, JEN JCH, LLC, Joseph Carl Mulac III, Stephen Adams and Sun Terra Communities, LLC (collectively, “Sellers”), Avatar Holdings Inc., and JEN Partners, LLC (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.81
|
|
|
|
Earnout Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.82
|
|
|
|
Voting Standstill and Lock-Up Letter Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith).
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules – continued
|
23.1
|
|
*
|
|
Consent of Akerman Senterfitt (included in Exhibit 5.1 to Form 8-K, dated as of February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (filed herewith).
|
*
|
These exhibits are incorporated by reference and are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
1
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
Charged to Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
Deduction/(Addition)
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gross profit on homesite sales
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
144 |
(2) |
|
|
(119 |
)(3) |
|
|
1,217 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
|
|
12,103 |
(4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,522 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
11,633 |
|
|
$ |
12,247 |
|
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
$ |
23,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gross profit on homesite sales
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
22 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
499 |
(2) |
|
|
(54 |
)(3) |
|
|
1,192 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
19,567 |
|
|
|
(9,148 |
)(4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,419 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
20,337 |
|
|
$ |
(8,649 |
) |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
11,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deducted from asset accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gross profit on homesite sales
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
(2) |
|
$ |
(27 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
435 |
(2) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
747 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,567 |
(4) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,567 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
20,024 |
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
20,337 |
|
(1) (Credit) charge to operations as an (increase) decrease to revenues.
(2) Charge to operations as an increase to real estate expenses.
(3) Uncollectible accounts written off.
(4) In accordance with ASC 740, Avatar evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required. ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established based on the consideration of all available evidence using a “more likely than not” standard. During 2008, we established a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Based on our evaluation during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded an additional valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets generated as a result of our net loss during the year ended December 31, 2008. Our cumulative loss position over the evaluation period and the uncertain and volatile market conditions provided significant evidence supporting the need for a valuation allowance. During the first nine months of 2009, we recognized an increase of $9,522 in the valuation allowance. However due to the new federal tax legislation as discussed above, we decreased the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2009 by $9,148. As of December 31, 2009, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $10,419. During the year ended December 31, 2010 we recognized an increase of $12,103 in the valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2010, our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $22,522. In future periods, the allowance could be reduced based on sufficient evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets will be realized.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
AVATAR HOLDINGS INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael P. Rama
|
|
|
|
Michael P. Rama, Controller, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Jon M. Donnell, Director, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael P. Rama
|
|
|
|
Michael P. Rama, Controller, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joshua Nash
|
|
|
|
Joshua Nash, Director and Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Allen J. Anderson
|
|
|
|
Allen J. Anderson, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Paul D. Barnett
|
|
|
|
Paul D. Barnett, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Milton Dresner
|
|
|
|
Milton Dresner, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Roger W. Einiger
|
|
|
|
Roger W. Einiger, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald D. Kelfer, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Reuben S. Leibowitz
|
|
|
|
Reuben S. Leibowitz, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Kenneth T. Rosen
|
|
|
|
Kenneth T. Rosen, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joel M. Simon
|
|
|
|
Joel M. Simon, Director
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: March 16, 2011
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Beth A. Stewart
|
|
|
|
Beth A. Stewart, Director
|
*
|
These exhibits are incorporated by reference and are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
1
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|
3.1 |
|
* |
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and restated May 28, 1998 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
* |
|
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated May 26, 2000 (filed as Exhibit 3(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
* |
|
Amended and Restated By-laws as of March 5, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 3(d) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
* |
|
Indenture, dated March 30, 2004, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, in respect of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
* |
|
Indenture, dated February 4, 2011, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
* |
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 4, 2011, between Avatar Holdings Inc., and Wilmington Trust FSB, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
* |
|
Global Note in the principal sum of $100,000,000, dated February 4, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K dated February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
*1 |
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of February 19, 1999, by and between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10(s) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
*1 |
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-63278), filed on June 19, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
*1 |
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(a) to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
*1 |
|
Amendment to Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (50,000 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (23,700 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Exhibit Index - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (20,000 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (15,000 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (16,300 units), dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
*1 |
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jonathan Fels (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
|
*1 |
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of March 13, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2003, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15 |
|
*1 |
|
2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-Kdated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
*1 |
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.18 |
|
*1 |
|
2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.19 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @ $65.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.20 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @ $72.50), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Exhibit Index - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (30,000 units @ $80.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22 |
|
*1 |
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2005, among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
*1 |
|
2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.25 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @ $65.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.24 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.26 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @ $72.50), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (25,000 units @ $80.00), dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
*1 |
|
Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for Non-Employee Directors' Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 13, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.29 |
|
*1 |
|
First Amendment, dated as of September 28, 2005, to the 2005 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2005, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.30 |
|
*1 |
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.31 |
|
* |
|
Option Agreement, dated October 20, 2006, between Avatar Properties Inc. and The Nature Conservancy (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
*1 |
|
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.33 |
|
*1 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
Exhibit Index - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.34 |
|
*1 |
|
Second Amendment to the 2005 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael F. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
*1 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated as of December 26, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael F. Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K dated December 28, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
|
*1 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(bx) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.37 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2006, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(by) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
*1 |
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2006, among Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10(bz) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.39 |
|
* |
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006 by and between Osceola County, Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10(ca) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
* |
|
Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006 by and between Polk County, Florida and Avatar Properties Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10(cb) to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.41 |
|
*1 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File No. 0-7616), incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.42 |
|
*1 |
|
Amendment to Avatar Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive and Capital Accumulation Plan (2005 Restatement) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated June 4, 2007 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
* |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated March 27, 2008, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc. (as Guarantor), Avatar Properties Inc. (as Borrower), Wachovia Bank, National Association (as Administrative Agent and Lender), and certain financial institutions as lenders (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.44 |
|
* |
|
Second Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2008, executed on behalf of Avatar Holdings Inc. ("Guarantor") in favor of the lending institution(s) identified therein and Wachovia Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.45 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @ $80.86), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.46 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @ $84.71), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Exhibit Index - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47 |
|
*1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2,500 units @ $88.56), dated June 26, 2007, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.48 |
|
* |
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.49 |
|
* |
|
Transportation Concurrency Agreement, dated December 15, 2006, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
* |
|
Amendment to Transportation Concurrency Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Osceola County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated July 29, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.51 |
|
* |
|
First Amended and Restated Poinciana Parkway Regulatory Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2008, by and between Avatar Properties Inc. and Polk County, Florida (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 11, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.52 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.53 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia K. Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.55 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.56 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated 2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.57 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Properties Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.58 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated 2008-2010 Earnings Participation Award Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Michael Levy (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.59 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia K. Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.60 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Exhibit Index - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.61 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500 Units; hurdle price condition: $80.86) (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.62 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500 Units; hurdle price condition $84.71) (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (2,500 Units; hurdle price condition $88.56) (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Form 8-K dated December 22, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.64 |
|
*1 |
|
Amended and Restated Form of Deferred Compensation Agreement for Non-Employee Directors' Fees (filed as Exhibit 10.97 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.65 |
|
*1 |
|
Compensation of certain named executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.66 |
|
* |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2009, by and among Avatar Properties Inc. (“Borrower”), Avatar Holdings Inc., (“Guarantor”), the several lenders from time to time parties thereto (“Lenders”), and Wachovia Bank, National Association (“Agent” and “Lender”) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated May 26, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.67 |
|
* |
|
Underwriting Agreement, dated September 23, 2009, between Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., Frenchman’s Yacht Club Developers, LLC and Barclays Capital Inc., (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K dated September 23, 2009 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.68 |
|
*1 |
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher, dated October 26, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.84 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
*1 |
|
Separation and Release Agreement, between Avatar Properties Inc., and Jonathan Fels, dated December 29, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 10.85 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.70 |
|
* |
|
Guaranty Agreement dated May 18, 2010, executed on behalf of Avatar Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.71 |
|
* |
|
Continuing Letter of Credit Agreement dated May 18, 2010, executed on behalf of Avatar Properties Inc., a Florida corporation, and Avatar Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in favor of Wells Fargo, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K darted May 24 ,2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72 |
|
* |
|
Security Agreement dated May 18, 2010, executed on behalf of Avatar Properties Inc., a Florida corporation, and Avatar Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, in favor of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wachovia Bank, N.A. (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K dated May 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.73 |
|
*1 |
|
Director Compensation (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
Exhibit Index - continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.74
|
|
*1
|
|
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated May 6, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Randy Kotler (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.75
|
|
*1
|
|
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 25, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated August 25, 2010 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.76
|
|
*1
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated August 25, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Patricia Kimball Fletcher (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K dated August 25, 2010 (File No. 0-7616), and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Separation Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Gerald D. Kelfer (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc. and Jon M. Donnell (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2010, between Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., and Carl Mulac (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Properties Inc., Terra West Communities LLC, JEN JCH, LLC, Joseph Carl Mulac III, Stephen Adams and Sun Terra Communities, LLC (collectively, “Sellers”), Avatar Holdings Inc., and JEN Partners, LLC (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnout Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting Standstill and Lock-Up Letter Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., Avatar Properties Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among Avatar Holdings Inc., JEN I, L.P. and JEN Residential LP (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
*
|
|
Consent of Akerman Senterfitt (included in Exhibit 5.1 to Form 8-K, dated as of February 4, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (filed herewith).
|