Edgar Filing: PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from to

Commission File Number 001-16707

Prudential Financial, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


New Jersey		22-3703799
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

751 Broad Street

Newark, New Jersey 07102

(973) 802-6000

(Address and Telephone Number of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of the Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of July 31, 2009, 461 million shares of the registrant’s Common Stock (par value $0.01) were outstanding. In addition, 2 million shares of the registrant’s Class B Stock, for which there is no established public trading market, were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


			Page Number

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements:
		Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	1
		Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	2
		Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	3
		Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	4
		Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements	5
		Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Financial Information:
		Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Statements of Financial Position as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	92
		Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	93
		Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	94
		Notes to Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Financial Information	95
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	97
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	267
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	267

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	268
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	269
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	288
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	289
	Item 6.	Exhibits	290

SIGNATURES			291

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including but not limited to those in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “includes,” “plans,” “assumes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “should,” “will,” “shall” or variations of such words are generally part of forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects upon Prudential Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting Prudential Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries will be those anticipated by management. These forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and there are certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ, possibly materially, from expectations or estimates reflected in such forward-looking statements, including, among others: (1) general economic, market and political conditions, including the performance and fluctuations of fixed income, equity, real estate and other financial markets, particularly in light of ongoing severe economic conditions and the severe stress experienced by the global financial markets since the second half of 2007; (2) the availability and cost of external financing for our operations, which has been affected by the stress experienced by the global financial markets; (3) interest rate fluctuations; (4) reestimates of our reserves for future policy benefits and claims; (5) differences between actual experience regarding mortality, morbidity, persistency, surrender experience, interest rates or market returns and the assumptions we use in pricing our products, establishing liabilities and reserves or for other purposes; (6) changes in our assumptions related to deferred policy acquisition costs, valuation of business acquired or goodwill; (7) changes in our claims-paying or credit ratings; (8) investment losses, defaults and counterparty non-performance; (9) competition in our product lines and for personnel; (10) changes in tax law; (11) economic, political, currency and other risks relating to our international operations; (12) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and foreign securities markets; (13) regulatory or legislative changes, including government actions in response to the stress experienced by the global financial markets; (14) adverse determinations in litigation or regulatory matters and our exposure to contingent liabilities, including in connection with our divestiture or winding down of businesses; (15) domestic or international military actions, natural or man-made disasters including terrorist activities or pandemic disease, or other events resulting in catastrophic loss of life; (16) ineffectiveness of risk management policies and procedures in identifying, monitoring and managing risks; (17) effects of acquisitions, divestitures and restructurings, including possible difficulties in integrating and realizing the projected results of acquisitions; (18) changes in statutory or U.S. GAAP accounting principles, practices or policies; (19) changes in assumptions for retirement expense; (20) Prudential Financial, Inc.’s primary reliance, as a holding company, on dividends or distributions from its subsidiaries to meet debt payment obligations and the ability of the subsidiaries to pay such dividends or distributions in light of our ratings objectives and/or applicable regulatory restrictions; and (21) risks due to the lack of legal separation between our Financial Services Businesses and our Closed Block Business. As noted above, the period since the second half of 2007 has been characterized by extreme adverse market and economic conditions. The foregoing risks are even more pronounced in these unprecedented market and economic conditions. Prudential Financial, Inc. does not intend, and is under no obligation, to update any particular forward-looking statement included in this document. See “Risk Factors” included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for discussion of certain risks relating to our businesses and investment in our securities.

Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, “Prudential Financial” and the “Registrant” refer to Prudential Financial, Inc., the ultimate holding company for all of our companies. “Prudential Insurance” refers to The Prudential Insurance Company of America, before and after its demutualization on December 18, 2001. “Prudential,” the “Company,” “we” and “our” refer to our consolidated operations before and after demutualization.

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in millions, except share amounts)


	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Fixed maturities, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2009—$166,075; 2008—$168,691)	$	158,913		$	158,056
Fixed maturities, held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value: 2009—$4,938; 2008—$3,832)		4,935			3,808
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value		14,766			13,875
Other trading account assets, at fair value		3,715			4,336
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value (cost: 2009—$6,019; 2008—$7,288)		5,917			6,065
Commercial mortgage and other loans (includes $508 measured at fair value at June 30, 2009)		32,694			33,114
Policy loans		9,856			9,703
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		—			480
Other long-term investments		5,716			7,012
Short-term investments		7,137			5,576

Total investments		243,649			242,025
Cash and cash equivalents		13,491			15,028
Accrued investment income		2,231			2,266
Deferred policy acquisition costs		14,474			15,126
Deferred income taxes, net		—			1,106
Other assets		19,605			22,365
Separate account assets		151,266			147,095

TOTAL ASSETS	$	444,716		$	445,011

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Future policy benefits	$	121,394		$	121,951
Policyholders’ account balances		101,277			99,613
Policyholders’ dividends		1,667			1,670
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		7,168			7,900
Cash collateral for loaned securities		3,662			4,168
Income taxes		777			459
Short-term debt		3,643			10,535
Long-term debt (includes $1,167 measured at fair value at June 30, 2009)		20,981			20,290
Other liabilities		14,206			17,544
Separate account liabilities		151,266			147,095

Total liabilities		426,041			431,225

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (See Note 15)
EQUITY
Preferred Stock ($.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued)		—			—
Common Stock ($.01 par value; 1,500,000,000 shares authorized; 641,761,510 and 604,902,444 shares issued as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)		6			6
Class B Stock ($.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 2,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)		—			—
Additional paid-in capital		23,325			22,001
Common Stock held in treasury, at cost (181,278,929 and 183,582,565 shares as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)		(11,494	)		(11,655	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(5,002	)		(7,343	)
Retained earnings		11,238			10,426

Total Prudential Financial, Inc. equity		18,073			13,435

Noncontrolling interests		602			351

Total equity		18,675			13,786

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	444,716		$	445,011

See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
REVENUES
Premiums	$	4,187		$	3,927		$	8,221		$	7,885
Policy charges and fee income		713			824			1,439			1,649
Net investment income		2,835			3,026			5,690			6,052
Asset management fees and other income		1,446			824			2,245			1,485
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		(1,312	)		(661	)		(3,167	)		(1,200	)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income		813			—			2,063			—
Other realized investment gains (losses), net		(1,776	)		(237	)		(1,026	)		(610	)

Total realized investment gains (losses), net		(2,275	)		(898	)		(2,130	)		(1,810	)

Total revenues		6,906			7,703			15,465			15,261

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES
Policyholders’ benefits		3,886			4,011			8,227			8,046
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		1,099			745			2,268			1,382
Dividends to policyholders		277			158			276			717
General and administrative expenses		1,652			2,161			4,690			4,426

Total benefits and expenses		6,914			7,075			15,461			14,571

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF OPERATING JOINT VENTURES		(8	)		628			4			690

Income tax expense (benefit)		(162	)		60			(158	)		83

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF OPERATING JOINT VENTURES		154			568			162			607
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, net of taxes		5			24			(1	)		67

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		159			592			161			674
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		21			(3	)		22			(1	)

NET INCOME		180			589			183			673
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests		17			8			6			32

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.	$	163		$	581		$	177		$	641

EARNINGS PER SHARE (See Note 8)
Financial Services Businesses
Basic:
Income from continuing operations attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share of Common Stock	$	1.21		$	1.34		$	1.23		$	1.50
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		0.04			(0.01	)		0.05			—

Net income attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share of Common Stock	$	1.25		$	1.33		$	1.28		$	1.50

Diluted:
Income from continuing operations attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share of Common Stock	$	1.20		$	1.33		$	1.23		$	1.49
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		0.05			(0.01	)		0.05			—

Net income attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share of Common Stock	$	1.25		$	1.32		$	1.28		$	1.49

Closed Block Business
Basic and Diluted:
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share of Class B Stock	$	(193.00	)	$	0.50		$	(189.00	)	$	(9.50	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share of Class B Stock	$	(193.00	)	$	0.50		$	(189.00	)	$	(9.50	)

See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Equity

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions)


	Prudential Financial, Inc. Equity																		Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
	Common Stock		Class B Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Common Stock Held in Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Prudential Financial, Inc. Equity		Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	6	$	—	$	22,001		$	10,426		$	(11,655	)	$	(7,343	)	$	13,435	$	351		$	13,786
Common Stock issued		—		—		1,391			—			—			—			1,391		—			1,391
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—			—			—		278			278
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—			—			—			—		(8	)		(8	)
Stock-based compensation programs		—		—		(67	)		(29	)		161			—			65		—			65
Impact of adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, net of taxes		—		—		—			664			—			(664	)		—		—			—
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—			177			—			—			177		6			183
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		—		—		—			—			—			3,005			3,005		(25	)		2,980

Total comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—			—			—			—			3,182		(19	)		3,163

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	6	$	—	$	23,325		$	11,238		$	(11,494	)	$	(5,002	)	$	18,073	$	602		$	18,675


	Prudential Financial, Inc. Equity																		Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
	Common Stock		Class B Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Common Stock Held in Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total Prudential Financial, Inc. Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance, December 31, 2007	$	6	$	—	$	20,945	$	11,809		$	(9,693	)	$	447		$	23,514		$	409		$	23,923
Common Stock acquired		—		—		—		—			(1,750	)		—			(1,750	)		—			(1,750	)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			5			5
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—			—			—			—			(152	)		(152	)
Stock-based compensation programs		—		—		—		(13	)		128			—			115			—			115
Impact of Company’s investment in Wachovia Securities due to addition of AG Edwards business, net of tax		—		—		977		—			—			—			977			—			977
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, net of taxes		—		—		—		3			—			—			3			—			3
Comprehensive income:
Net income		—		—		—		641			—			—			641			32			673
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—		—		—		—			—			(1,892	)		(1,892	)		(1	)		(1,893	)

Total comprehensive income (loss)		—		—		—		—			—			—			(1,251	)		31			(1,220	)

Balance, June 30, 2008	$	6	$	—	$	21,922	$	12,440		$	(11,315	)	$	(1,445	)	$	21,608		$	293		$	21,901

See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions)


	2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	183		$	673
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Realized investment (gains) losses, net		2,130			1,810
Policy charges and fee income		(786	)		(537	)
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		2,268			1,382
Depreciation and amortization		192			208
(Gains) losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, net		(840	)		375
Change in:
Deferred policy acquisition costs		(133	)		(513	)
Future policy benefits and other insurance liabilities		(1,033	)		1,751
Other trading account assets		1,977			302
Income taxes		(152	)		(465	)
Other, net		(47	)		(1,364	)

Cash flows from operating activities		3,759			3,622

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the sale/maturity/prepayment of:
Fixed maturities, available for sale		25,410			46,923
Fixed maturities, held to maturity		168			111
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities and other trading account assets		14,969			11,952
Equity securities, available for sale		840			1,899
Commercial mortgage and other loans		1,628			1,162
Policy loans		844			716
Other long-term investments		672			525
Short-term investments		12,887			16,159
Payments for the purchase/origination of:
Fixed maturities, available for sale		(22,270	)		(45,610	)
Fixed maturities, held to maturity		(952	)		(24	)
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities and other trading account assets		(16,243	)		(13,148	)
Equity securities, available for sale		(326	)		(2,151	)
Commercial mortgage and other loans		(1,609	)		(3,404	)
Policy loans		(785	)		(737	)
Other long-term investments		(905	)		(1,477	)
Short-term investments		(14,295	)		(17,807	)
Other, net		158			(84	)

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities		191			(4,995	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Policyholders’ account deposits		15,513			16,995
Policyholders’ account withdrawals		(15,273	)		(11,013	)
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and cash collateral for loaned securities		(974	)		(4,838	)
Proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock		1,391			—
Cash dividends paid on Common Stock		(37	)		(83	)
Net change in financing arrangements (maturities 90 days or less)		(3,386	)		(1,244	)
Common Stock acquired		—			(1,717	)
Common Stock reissued for exercise of stock options		22			56
Proceeds from the issuance of debt (maturities longer than 90 days)		2,868			5,788
Repayments of debt (maturities longer than 90 days)		(5,494	)		(3,444	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements		—			15
Other, net		(64	)		(276	)

Cash flows from (used in) financing activities		(5,434	)		239

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash balances		(53	)		17
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(1,537	)		(1,117	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR		15,028			11,060

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	13,491		$	9,943

NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS DURING THE PERIOD
Impact on Company’s investment in Wachovia Securities due to addition of A.G. Edwards business, net of tax	$	—		$	977
Treasury Stock shares issued for stock-based compensation programs	$	97		$	87

See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

1. BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Prudential Financial, Inc. (“Prudential Financial”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Prudential” or the “Company”) provide a wide range of insurance, investment management, and other financial products and services to both individual and institutional customers throughout the United States and in many other countries. Principal products and services provided include life insurance, annuities, retirement-related services, mutual funds, investment management, and real estate services. The Company has organized its principal operations into the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. The Financial Services Businesses operate through three operating divisions: U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management, U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance, and International Insurance and Investments. The Company’s real estate and relocation services business as well as businesses that are not sufficiently material to warrant separate disclosure and businesses to be divested, including the Company’s investment in the retail securities brokerage joint venture Wachovia Securities Financial Holdings, LLC (“Wachovia Securities”), are included in Corporate and Other operations within the Financial Services Businesses. The Closed Block Business, which includes the Closed Block (see Note 6), is managed separately from the Financial Services Businesses. The Closed Block Business was established on the date of demutualization and includes the Company’s in force participating insurance and annuity products and assets that are used for the payment of benefits and policyholders’ dividends on these products, as well as other assets and equity that support these products and related liabilities. In connection with the demutualization, the Company ceased offering these participating products.

Basis of Presentation

The Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Prudential Financial, entities over which the Company exercises control, including majority-owned subsidiaries and minority-owned entities such as limited partnerships in which the Company is the general partner, and variable interest entities in which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. The Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) on a basis consistent with reporting interim financial information in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 7, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The most significant estimates include those used in determining deferred policy acquisition costs and related amortization; measurement of goodwill and any related impairment; valuation of business acquired and its amortization; valuation of investments including derivatives and the recognition of other-than-temporary

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

impairments; future policy benefits including guarantees; pension and other postretirement benefits; provision for income taxes and valuation of deferred tax assets; reserves for contingent liabilities, including reserves for losses in connection with unresolved legal matters.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

2. ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND PRONOUNCEMENTS

Share-Based Payments

The Company issues employee share-based compensation awards, under a plan authorized by the Board of Directors, that are subject to specific vesting conditions. Generally the awards vest ratably over a three-year period, “the nominal vesting period,” or at the date the employee retires (as defined by the plan), if earlier. The Company accounts for those awards granted between (a) the adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” on January 1, 2003, and (b) the adoption on January 1, 2006 of SFAS No. 123(R) which specify that an employee vests in the award upon retirement, using the nominal vesting period approach. Under this approach, the Company records compensation expense over the nominal vesting period. If the employee retires before the end of the nominal vesting period, any remaining unrecognized compensation cost is recognized at the date of retirement.

Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company revised its approach to the recognition of compensation costs for awards granted to retirement-eligible employees and awards that vest when an employee becomes retirement-eligible to apply the non-substantive vesting period approach to all new share-based compensation awards granted after January 1, 2006. Under this approach, all compensation cost is recognized on the date of grant for awards issued to retirement-eligible employees, or over the period from the grant date to the date retirement eligibility is achieved, if that is expected to occur during the nominal vesting period.

If the Company had accounted for all share-based compensation awards granted after January 1, 2003 under the non-substantive vesting period approach, net income of the Financial Services Businesses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 would have been increased by $0.2 million and $1 million, respectively, with no reportable impact to the earnings per share of Common Stock, on both a basic and diluted basis. There is no impact to net income for 2009, as all compensation expense relating to share-based compensation awards accounted for under the nominal vesting period approach had been recognized in net income by December 31, 2008.

Investments in Debt and Equity Securities

Fixed maturities are comprised of bonds, notes and redeemable preferred stock. Fixed maturities classified as “available for sale” are carried at fair value. See Note 12 for additional information regarding the determination of fair value. Fixed maturities that the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost and classified as “held to maturity.” The amortized cost of fixed maturities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Interest income, as well as the related amortization of premium and accretion of discount is included in “Net investment income” under the effective yield method. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, the effective yield is based on estimated cash flows, including prepayment assumptions based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates vary based on assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates and changes in value. These assumptions

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

can significantly impact income recognition and the amount of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income. For high credit quality mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities (those rated AA or above), cash flows are provided quarterly, and the amortized cost and effective yield of the security are adjusted as necessary to reflect historical prepayment experience and changes in estimated future prepayments. The adjustments to amortized cost are recorded as a charge or credit to net investment income in accordance with the retrospective method. For asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities rated below AA, the effective yield is adjusted prospectively for any changes in estimated cash flows. See the discussion below on realized investment gains and losses for a description of the accounting for impairments as well as the impact of the Company’s adoption of FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities classified as “available for sale,” net of tax, and the effect on deferred policy acquisition costs, valuation of business acquired, future policy benefits and policyholders’ dividends that would result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses, are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).”

“Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value” includes invested assets that support certain products included in the Retirement segment, as well as certain products included in the International Insurance segment, which are experience rated, meaning that the investment results associated with these products are expected to ultimately accrue to contractholders. Realized and unrealized gains and losses for these investments are reported in “Asset management fees and other income.” Interest and dividend income from these investments is reported in “Net investment income.”

“Other trading account assets, at fair value” consist primarily of investments and certain derivatives used by the Company either in its capacity as a broker-dealer or for asset and liability management activities. These instruments are carried at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on other trading account assets are reported in “Asset management fees and other income.” Interest and dividend income from these investments is reported in “Net investment income.”

Equity securities available for sale are comprised of common stock, mutual fund shares, non-redeemable preferred stock, and perpetual preferred stock, and are carried at fair value. The associated unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, and the effect on deferred policy acquisition costs, valuation of business acquired, future policy benefits and policyholders’ dividends that would result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses, are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” The cost of equity securities is written down to fair value when a decline in value is considered to be other-than-temporary. See the discussion below on realized investment gains and losses for a description of the accounting for impairments. Dividends from these investments are recognized in “Net investment income” when declared.

Short-term investments primarily consist of highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of greater than three months and less than twelve months when purchased, other than those debt instruments meeting this definition that are included in “Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value.” These investments are generally carried at fair value and include money market investments, short-term debt securities issued by government sponsored entities and other highly liquid debt instruments.

Realized investment gains (losses) are computed using the specific identification method with the exception of some of the Company’s International Insurance businesses’ portfolios, where the average cost method is used. Realized investment gains and losses are generated from numerous sources, including the sale of fixed maturity securities, equity securities, investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships and other types of investments, as well as adjustments to the cost basis of investments for net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings. Realized investment gains and losses are also generated from prepayment premiums received on private fixed maturity securities, recoveries of principal on previously impaired securities, provisions for losses

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

on commercial mortgage and other loans, fair value changes on commercial mortgage loans carried at fair value, gains on commercial mortgage loans in connection with securitization transactions, and fair value changes on embedded derivatives and derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, except those derivatives used in the Company’s capacity as a broker or dealer.

The Company’s available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities with unrealized losses are reviewed quarterly to identify other-than-temporary impairments in value. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company considers several factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) the extent and the duration of the decline; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. With regard to available-for-sale equity securities, the Company also considers the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. When it is determined that a decline in value of an equity security is other-than-temporary, the carrying value of the equity security is reduced to its fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings.

In addition, in April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” The Company early adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009. This guidance indicates that an other-than-temporary impairment must be recognized in earnings for a debt security in an unrealized loss position when an entity either (a) has the intent to sell the debt security or (b) more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. Prior to the adoption of this guidance the Company was required to record an other-than-temporary impairment for a debt security unless it could assert that it had both the intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in its fair value to its amortized cost basis. For all debt securities in unrealized loss positions that do not meet either of these two criteria, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 requires that the Company analyze its ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of projected future cash flows with the amortized cost of the security. The net present value is calculated by discounting the Company’s best estimate of projected future cash flows at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. The Company may use the estimated fair value of collateral as a proxy for the net present value if it believes that the security is dependent on the liquidation of collateral for recovery of its investment. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment, an other-than-temporary impairment is recorded.

Under FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, when an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether the Company intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the debt security meets either of these two criteria, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the impairment measurement date. For other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities that do not meet these two criteria, the net amount recognized in earnings is equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the debt security and its net present value calculated as described above. Any difference between the fair value and the net present value of the debt security at the impairment measurement date is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).” Unrealized gains or losses on securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings is tracked as a separate component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” Prior to the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings for debt securities was equal to the total difference between amortized cost and fair value at the time of impairment.

For debt securities, the split between the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income and the net amount recognized in earnings is driven principally by assumptions regarding

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

the amount and timing of projected cash flows. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates including prepayment assumptions, are based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates vary based on assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates, recoveries and changes in value. For all other debt securities, cash flow estimates are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. The Company has developed these estimates using information based on its historical experience as well as using market observable data, such as industry analyst reports and forecasts, sector credit ratings and other data relevant to the collectability of a security.

Goodwill

The Company tests goodwill for impairment annually as of December 31 and more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. A reporting unit is an operating segment or a unit one level below the operating segment.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign exchange rates, financial indices or the values of securities or commodities. Derivative financial instruments generally used by the Company include swaps, futures, forwards and options and may be exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter market. Derivative positions are carried at fair value, generally by obtaining quoted market prices or through the use of valuation models. Values can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, financial indices, values of securities or commodities, credit spreads, market volatility, expected returns and liquidity. Values can also be affected by changes in estimates and assumptions, including those related to counterparty behavior, used in valuation models.

Derivatives are used in a non-dealer capacity in insurance, investment and international businesses as well as treasury operations to manage the characteristics of the Company’s asset/liability mix, to manage the interest rate and currency characteristics of assets or liabilities and to mitigate the risk of a diminution, upon translation to U.S. dollars, of expected non-U.S. earnings and net investments in foreign operations resulting from unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates. Additionally, derivatives may be used to seek to reduce exposure to interest rate, credit, foreign currency and equity risks associated with assets held or expected to be purchased or sold, and liabilities incurred or expected to be incurred. As discussed in detail below and in Note 14, all realized and unrealized changes in fair value of non-dealer related derivatives, with the exception of the effective portion of cash flow hedges and effective hedges of net investments in foreign operations, are recorded in current earnings. Cash flows from these derivatives are reported in the operating, investing, or financing activities sections in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Derivatives are also used in a derivative dealer or broker capacity in the Company’s securities operations to meet the needs of clients by structuring transactions that allow clients to manage their exposure to interest rates, foreign exchange rates, indices or prices of securities and commodities and similarly in a dealer or broker capacity through the operation of certain hedge portfolios. Realized and unrealized changes in fair value of derivatives used in these dealer related operations are included in “Asset management fees and other income” in the periods in which the changes occur. Cash flows from such derivatives are reported in the operating activities section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Derivatives are recorded either as assets, within “Other trading account assets,” or “Other long-term investments,” or as liabilities, within “Other liabilities,” in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, except for embedded derivatives which are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position with the associated host contract. The Company nets the fair value of all derivative financial instruments with counterparties for which a master netting arrangement has been executed pursuant to FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 39 and FSP No. 39-1.

For non-dealer related derivatives the Company designates derivatives as either (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or unrecognized firm commitment (“fair value” hedge); (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow” hedge); (3) a foreign-currency fair value or cash flow hedge (“foreign currency” hedge); (4) a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation; or (5) a derivative that does not qualify for hedge accounting.

To qualify for hedge accounting treatment, a derivative must be highly effective in mitigating the designated risk of the hedged item. Effectiveness of the hedge is formally assessed at inception and throughout the life of the hedging relationship. Even if a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, there may be an element of ineffectiveness of the hedge. Under such circumstances, the ineffective portion is recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”

The Company formally documents at inception all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as fair value, cash flow, or foreign currency hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation are linked to the specific foreign operation.

When a derivative is designated as a fair value hedge and is determined to be highly effective, changes in its fair value, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability (including losses or gains on firm commitments), are reported on a net basis in the income statement, generally in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” When swaps are used in hedge accounting relationships, periodic settlements are recorded in the same income statement line as the related settlements of the hedged items.

When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge and is determined to be highly effective, changes in its fair value are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows being hedged (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). At that time, the related portion of deferred gains or losses on the derivative instrument is reclassified and reported in the income statement line item associated with the hedged item.

When a derivative is designated as a foreign currency hedge and is determined to be highly effective, changes in its fair value are recorded in either current period earnings or “Accumulated other comprehensive

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

income (loss),” depending on whether the hedge transaction is a fair value hedge (e.g., a hedge of a recognized foreign currency asset or liability) or a cash flow hedge (e.g., a foreign currency denominated forecasted transaction). When a derivative is used as a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation, its change in fair value, to the extent effective as a hedge, is recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account within “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).”

If it is determined that a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective fair value or cash flow hedge or management removes the hedge designation, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The asset or liability under a fair value hedge will no longer be adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized to the income statement line associated with the asset or liability. The component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” related to discontinued cash flow hedges is amortized to the income statement line associated with the hedged cash flows consistent with the earnings impact of the original hedged cash flows.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because the hedged item no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, or because it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the specified time period, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” Any asset or liability that was recorded pursuant to recognition of the firm commitment is removed from the balance sheet and recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” Gains and losses that were in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” pursuant to the hedge of a forecasted transaction are recognized immediately in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”

If a derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting, all changes in its fair value, including net receipts and payments, are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” without considering changes in the fair value of the economically associated assets or liabilities.

The Company is a party to financial instruments that contain derivative instruments that are “embedded” in the financial instruments. At inception, the Company assesses whether the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the financial instrument (i.e., the host contract) and whether a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument. When it is determined that (1) the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and (2) a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and changes in its fair value are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” For certain financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would need to be bifurcated and reported at fair value, the Company may elect to classify the entire instrument as a trading account asset and report it within “Other trading account assets,” at fair value.

Income Taxes

The Company’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest and penalties which relate to tax years still subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or other taxing jurisdictions. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. Generally, for tax years which produce net operating losses, capital losses or tax credit carryforwards (“tax attributes”), the statute of limitations does not close, to the extent of these tax attributes, until the expiration of the statute of

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

limitations for the tax year in which they are fully utilized. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the liability for income taxes. The statute of limitations for the 2002 tax year expired on April 30, 2009. The statute of limitations for the 2003 tax year expired on July 31, 2009. The statute of limitations for the 2004 and 2005 tax years is set to expire in June 2010. Tax years 2006 through 2008 are still open for IRS examination. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes within the next 12 months to its total unrecognized tax benefits related to tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired.

As discussed above, the completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the liability for income taxes. As such, the second quarter of 2009 benefited from a reduction to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest of $147 million primarily related to tax years prior to 2002 as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for the 2002 tax year, additional interest on a tax refund received related to the 1997 through 2001 tax years, and changes in estimates. Also as discussed above, the statute of limitations for the 2003 tax year expired on July 31, 2009. As a result, the Company’s income tax provision for the third quarter of 2009 will include a reduction to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest of approximately $165 million related to tax years prior to 2002.

The dividends received deduction (“DRD”) reduces the amount of dividend income subject to U.S. tax and is a significant component of the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. The DRD for the current period was estimated using information from 2008, current year results, and was adjusted to take into account the current year’s equity market performance. The actual current year DRD can vary from the estimate based on factors such as, but not limited to, changes in the amount of dividends received that are eligible for the DRD, changes in the amount of distributions received from mutual fund investments, changes in the account balances of variable life and annuity contracts, and the Company’s taxable income before the DRD.

In August 2007, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2007-54, which included, among other items, guidance on the methodology to be followed in calculating the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. In September 2007, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2007-61. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspends Revenue Ruling 2007-54 and informs taxpayers that the U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS have indicated that they intend to address through new regulations the issues considered in Revenue Ruling 2007-54, including the methodology to be followed in determining the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. On May 11, 2009, the Obama Administration released the “General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals.” Although the Administration has not released proposed statutory language, one proposal would change the method used to determine the amount of the DRD. A change in the DRD, including the possible retroactive or prospective elimination of this deduction through regulation or legislation, could increase actual tax expense and reduce the Company’s consolidated net income. These activities had no impact on the Company’s 2008 or 2009 results.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

consideration of the report and has taken no exception to the conclusions reached by the IRS. Accordingly, the final report was processed and a $157 million refund was received in February 2009. The Company believes that its return position with respect to the calculation of the DRD is technically correct. Therefore, the Company intends to file a protective refund claim within six months of the expiration of the respective statutes of limitations to recover the taxes associated with the agreed upon adjustment and to pursue such other actions as appropriate. These activities had no impact on the Company’s 2008 or 2009 results.

In January 2007, the IRS began an examination of tax years 2004 through 2006. For tax years 2007, 2008 and 2009, the Company participated in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”). Under CAP, the IRS assigns an examination team to review completed transactions contemporaneously during these tax years in order to reach agreement with the Company on how they should be reported in the tax returns. If disagreements arise, accelerated resolutions programs are available to resolve the disagreements in a timely manner before the tax returns are filed. It is management’s expectation this program will shorten the time period between the filing of the Company’s federal income tax returns and the IRS’s completion of its examination of the returns.

The Company’s affiliates in Japan file separate tax returns and are subject to audits by the local taxing authority. The general statute of limitations is 5 years from when the return is filed. During 2009, the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau concluded a routine tax audit of the tax returns of Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd. for its tax years ending March 31, 2004 to March 31, 2008. These activities had no material impact on the Company’s 2008 and 2009 results.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events.” This statement addresses the accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events not addressed in other applicable GAAP, including disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This guidance is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective with the interim period ending June 30, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The required disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated is provided in Note 1.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends the disclosure requirements. This FSP is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this guidance effective with the interim period ending June 30, 2009. The required disclosures are provided in Note 12.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for debt securities and expands the presentation and disclosure requirements of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP also requires that the required annual disclosures for debt and equity securities be made for interim reporting periods. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company early adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2009, which resulted in a net after-tax increase to retained earnings and decrease to Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) of $664 million. The disclosures required by this FSP are provided in Note 4. See “Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” above for more information.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, to provide guidance on (1) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability if there was a significant decrease in the volume and level of trading activity for these assets or liabilities, and (2) identifying transactions that are not orderly. Further, FSP 157-4 requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements in interim and annual periods and supersedes FSP FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active”. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company’s early adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The disclosures required by this FSP are provided in Note 12.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies.” This FSP requires an asset acquired or liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency to be recognized at fair value at the acquisition date, if the acquisition date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition date fair value of an asset acquired or liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency cannot be determined during the measurement period, the asset or liability shall be recognized at the acquisition date using the guidance in SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” This FSP also amends disclosure requirements. This FSP is effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In September 2008, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached consensus on EITF Issue No. 08-5, “Issuer’s Accounting for Liabilities Measured at Fair Value with a Third-Party Credit Enhancement.” The consensus concluded that (a) the issuer of a liability (including debt) with a third-party credit enhancement that is inseparable from the liability, shall not include the effect of the credit enhancement in the fair value measurement of the liability; (b) the issuer shall disclose the existence of any third-party credit enhancement on such liabilities, and (c) in the period of adoption the issuer shall disclose the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of such liabilities and disclose any changes from valuation techniques used in prior periods. The Company’s adoption of this guidance on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2008, the FASB EITF reached consensus on the following issues contained in EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock:” (1) how an entity should evaluate whether an instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to the entity’s own stock; (2) how the currency in which the strike price of an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded equity-linked feature) is denominated affects the determination of whether the instrument is indexed to the entity’s own stock; (3) how an issuer should account for equity-linked financial instruments issued to investors for purposes of establishing a market-based measure of the grant-date fair value of employee stock options. This guidance clarifies what instruments qualify as indexed to an entity’s own stock and are thereby exempt from requirements of FASB Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” and eligible for equity classification under EITF Issue No. 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock.” The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” This FSP states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share (EPS) pursuant to the two-class method described in paragraphs 60 and 61 of FASB Statement No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” This FSP is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008, and must be applied retrospectively to all EPS data presented. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 reduced earnings per basic share of Common Stock for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 by $0.01 and had no reportable impact on earnings per diluted share of Common Stock for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 reduced earnings per basic share of Common Stock for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 by $0.01, $0.05, $0.06, $0.06 and $0.02, respectively, and earnings per diluted share of Common Stock by $0.01, $0.01, $0.02, $0.03 and $0.01, respectively.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” This FSP, which is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied retrospectively, addresses the accounting for certain convertible debt instruments including those that have been issued by the Company. It requires bifurcation of the instrument into a debt component that is initially recorded at fair value and an equity component. The difference between the fair value of the debt component and the initial proceeds from issuance of the instrument is recorded as a component of equity within additional paid-in capital. The liability component of the debt instrument is accreted to par using the effective yield method, with the accretion being reported as a component of interest expense. Bond issuance costs are allocated to the debt and equity components in proportion to the debt proceeds. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 reduced net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 by $9 million or $0.02 per share of Common Stock, on both a basic and diluted basis and reduced net income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 by $18 million or $0.04 per share of Common Stock, on both a basic and diluted basis. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 reduced net income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 by $44 million, $42 million, $36 million and $5 million, or $0.10, $0.09, $0.07 and $0.01 per share of Common Stock, on both a basic and diluted basis, respectively.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” This FSP amends the list of factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of recognized intangible assets under SFAS No. 142. This FSP is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008, with the guidance for determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset being applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements being applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and after, the effective date. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” an amendment of SFAS No. 133. This statement amends and expands the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The required disclosures are provided in Note 14.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions.” The FSP provides recognition and derecognition guidance for a repurchase financing transaction, which is a repurchase agreement that relates to a previously transferred financial asset between the same counterparties, that is entered into contemporaneously with or in contemplation of, the initial transfer. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company’s adoption of this guidance on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157.” This FSP applies to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP FAS 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for these items to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations.” This statement, which addresses the accounting for business acquisitions, is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited, and generally applies to business acquisitions completed after December 31, 2008. Among other things, the new standard requires that all acquisition-related costs be expensed as incurred, and that all restructuring costs related to acquired operations be expensed as incurred. This new standard also addresses the current and subsequent accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies acquired or assumed and, for acquisitions both prior and subsequent to December 31, 2008, requires the acquirer to recognize changes in the amount of its deferred tax benefits that are recognizable because of a business combination either in income from continuing operations in the period of the combination or directly in contributed capital, depending on the circumstances. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations, but may have an effect on the accounting for future business combinations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified by the parent company as a component of equity. Upon adoption, SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing noncontrolling interests and prospective adoption for all other requirements. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations, but did affect financial statement presentation and disclosure. Noncontrolling interests, previously reported as a liability, are now required to be reported as a separate component of equity on the balance sheet, and totaled $293 million at June 30, 2008 and totaled $351 million, $409 million, $329 million, $110 million, and $97 million at December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In addition, income attributable to the noncontrolling interests, which was previously reported as an expense in “General and administrative expenses” and reflected within Income from Continuing Operations is now reported as a separate amount below Net Income, and totaled $8 million and $32 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and totaled $36 million, $67 million, $25 million, $21 million and $13 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification^TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.” The FASB’s Codification was launched on July 1, 2009 as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP to be applied by

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

nongovernmental entities. The Codification is not intended to change U.S. GAAP but is a new structure which takes accounting pronouncements and organizes them by accounting topic. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement will become effective for the Company beginning with the interim reporting period ending September 30, 2009 and will impact the way the Company references U.S. GAAP accounting standards in the financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).” This statement amends the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities. It also makes certain changes to the disclosures required under FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities,” which the Company adopted effective December 31, 2008. This statement is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this statement on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and financial statement disclosures.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.” This statement changes the accounting for transfers of financial assets, and is effective for transfers of financial assets occurring in interim and annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. It removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) from Statement No. 140 and removes the exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” to qualifying special-purpose entities. It also defines “participating interest” to establish specific conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale. Disclosure provisions will be applied to transfers that occurred both before and after January 1, 2010. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2010. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this statement on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and financial statement disclosures.

In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets”, which amends the plan asset disclosures required under FAS 132(R). This FSP requires additional disclosures about the components of plan assets, investment strategies for plan assets, significant concentrations of risk within plan assets, and requires disclosures regarding the measurement of plan assets similar to those required under SFAS No. 157. This FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company will provide the required disclosures in the annual reporting period ending December 31, 2009.

3. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

Acquisition of Yamato Life

On May 1, 2009, the Company’s Gibraltar Life operations acquired Yamato Life, a Japanese life insurance company that declared bankruptcy in October 2008. Gibraltar Life served as the reorganization sponsor for Yamato and under the reorganization agreement acquired Yamato by contributing $72 million of capital to Yamato. As of June 30, 2009, the Statement of Financial Position of Prudential Financial reflects $2.3 billion of assets and $2.3 billion of liabilities related to Yamato. Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company renamed the acquired company Prudential Financial of Japan Life Insurance Company Ltd.

Acquisition of Hyundai Investment and Securities Co., Ltd.

In 2004, the Company acquired an 80 percent interest in Hyundai Investment and Securities Co., Ltd., a Korean asset management firm, from an agency of the Korean government, for $301 million in cash, including

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

$210 million used to repay debt assumed. Subsequent to the acquisition, the company was renamed Prudential Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. On January 25, 2008, the Company acquired the remaining 20 percent for $90 million.

Additional Investment in UBI Pramerica

On January 18, 2008, the Company made an additional investment of $154 million in its UBI Pramerica operating joint venture in Italy, which is accounted for under the equity method. This additional investment was necessary to maintain the Company’s ownership interest at 35 percent and was a result of the merger of the Company’s joint venture partner with another Italian bank, and the subsequent consolidation of their asset management companies into the UBI Pramerica joint venture.

Discontinued Operations

Income (loss) from discontinued businesses, including charges upon disposition, are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Real estate investments sold or held for sale	$	26		$	—		$	28		$	1
Equity sales, trading and research operations		1			(1	)		1			(2	)
International securities operations		1			(3	)		1			(2	)
Mexican asset management operations		(1	)		—			(1	)		1

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes		27			(4	)		29			(2	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		6			(1	)		7			(1	)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	21		$	(3	)	$	22		$	(1	)

Real estate investments sold or held for sale reflects the income from discontinued real estate investments.

The Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position include total assets and total liabilities related to discontinued businesses of $157 million and $93 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009 and $218 million and $149 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2008. Charges recorded in connection with the disposals of businesses include estimates that are subject to subsequent adjustment. It is possible that such adjustments might be material to future net results of operations of a particular quarterly or annual period.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

4. INVESTMENTS

Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities

The following tables provide information relating to fixed maturities and equity securities (excluding investments classified as trading) as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Other-than- temporary impairments in AOCI(3)
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	6,260	$	483	$	180	$	6,563	$	—
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		714		36		2		748		—
Foreign government bonds		34,772		1,135		160		35,747		—
Corporate securities		86,436		2,120		5,707		82,849		(99	)
Asset-backed securities(1)		14,516		117		4,125		10,508		(1,748	)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		11,355		44		1,148		10,251		19
Residential mortgage-backed securities(2)		12,022		410		185		12,247		(11	)

Total fixed maturities, available for sale	$	166,075	$	4,345	$	11,507	$	158,913	$	(1,839	)

Equity securities, available for sale	$	6,019	$	557	$	659	$	5,917

(1)	Includes credit tranched securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, education loans, and other asset types.

(2)	Includes publicly traded agency pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.

(3)

Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairment losses in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),” or “AOCI,” which, from January 1, 2009, were not included in earnings under FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2. Amount excludes $113 million of net unrealized gains on impaired securities relating to changes in the value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date.


	June 30, 2009
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Other-than- temporary impairments in AOCI(3)
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, held to maturity
Foreign government bonds	$	1,022	$	35	$	1	$	1,056	$	—
Corporate securities		835		—		123		712		—
Asset-backed securities(1)		902		9		6		905		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		446		64		—		510		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities(2)		1,730		31		6		1,755		—

Total fixed maturities, held to maturity	$	4,935	$	139	$	136	$	4,938	$	—

(1)	Includes credit tranched securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, education loans, and other asset types.

(2)	Includes publicly traded agency pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations.

(3)	Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairment losses in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),” or “AOCI,” which, from January 1, 2009, were not included in earnings under FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	6,236	$	1,355	$	13	$	7,578
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		891		32		12		911
Foreign government bonds		32,585		2,266		112		34,739
Corporate securities		87,028		1,630		9,604		79,054
Asset-backed securities		16,057		109		4,174		11,992
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		12,381		5		2,334		10,052
Residential mortgage-backed securities		13,513		450		233		13,730

Total fixed maturities, available for sale	$	168,691	$	5,847	$	16,482	$	158,056

Equity securities, available for sale	$	7,288	$	259	$	1,482	$	6,065


	December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, held to maturity
Foreign government bonds	$	1,093	$	115	$	—	$	1,208
Corporate securities		867		9		128		748
Asset-backed securities		782		25		1		806
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		11		—		—		11
Residential mortgage-backed securities		1,055		8		4		1,059

Total fixed maturities, held to maturity	$	3,808	$	157	$	133	$	3,832

The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities by contractual maturities at June 30, 2009, are as follows:


	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Due in one year or less	$	7,711	$	7,702	$	10	$	10
Due after one year through five years		32,998		32,492		—		—
Due after five years through ten years		32,516		31,169		22		22
Due after ten years		54,957		54,544		1,825		1,736
Asset-backed securities		14,516		10,508		902		905
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		11,355		10,251		446		510
Residential mortgage-backed securities		12,022		12,247		1,730		1,755

Total	$	166,075	$	158,913	$	4,935	$	4,938

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Asset-backed, commercial mortgage-backed, and residential mortgage-backed securities are shown separately in the table above, as they are not due at a single maturity date.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following table depicts the sources of fixed maturity proceeds and related gross investment gains (losses), as well as losses on impairments of both fixed maturities and equity securities:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
Proceeds from sales	$	8,000		$	18,616		$	16,643		$	36,437
Proceeds from maturities/repayments		4,401			4,314			8,426			10,195
Gross investment gains from sales, prepayments and maturities		266			194			629			491
Gross investment losses from sales and maturities		(259	)		(210	)		(376	)		(394	)

Fixed maturities, held to maturity:
Proceeds from maturities/repayments	$	106		$	62		$	168		$	111
Gross investment gains from prepayments		—			—			—			—

Fixed maturity and equity security impairments:
Total writedowns for other-than-temporary impairment losses on fixed maturities	$	(1,312	)	$	(661	)	$	(3,167	)	$	(1,200	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)		813			—			2,063			—

Net writedowns for other-than-temporary impairment losses on fixed maturities recognized in earnings	$	(499	)	$	(661	)	$	(1,104	)	$	(1,200	)
Writedowns for other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities	$	(263	)	$	(230	)	$	(756	)	$	(330	)

As discussed in Note 2, a portion of certain other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses on fixed maturity securities are recognized in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” (“OCI”). The net amount recognized in earnings (“credit loss impairments”) represents the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. Any remaining difference between the fair value and amortized cost is recognized in OCI. The following tables set forth the amount of pre-tax credit loss impairments on fixed maturity securities held by the Company as of the dates indicated, for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI, and the corresponding changes in such amounts for the periods indicated.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


Credit losses recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	(in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	—
Credit losses remaining in retained earnings related to adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2		658
Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities which matured, paid down, prepaid or were sold during the period		(91	)
Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities impaired to fair value during the period(1)		(6	)
Credit loss impairment recognized in the current period on securities not previously impaired		558
Additional credit loss impairments recognized in the current period on securities previously impaired		394
Increases due to the passage of time on previously recorded credit losses		16
Accretion of credit loss impairments previously recognized due to an increase in cash flows expected to be collected		(7	)

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	1,522

(1)	Represents circumstances where the Company determined in the current period that it intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of the security’s amortized cost.


Credit losses recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	(in millions)
Balance, March 31, 2009	$	1,207
Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities which matured, paid down, prepaid or were sold during the period		(90	)
Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities impaired to fair value during the period(1)		(6	)
Credit loss impairment recognized in the current period on securities not previously impaired		164
Additional credit loss impairments recognized in the current period on securities previously impaired		239
Increases due to the passage of time on previously recorded credit losses		14
Accretion of credit loss impairments previously recognized due to an increase in cash flows expected to be collected		(6	)

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	1,522

(1)	Represents circumstances where the Company determined in the current period that it intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of the security’s amortized cost.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities

The following table sets forth the composition of “Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities” as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	$	553	$	553	$	1,232	$	1,232

Fixed maturities:
Corporate securities		8,870		8,612		8,814		7,971
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		2,235		2,132		2,335		2,092
Residential mortgage-backed securities		1,399		1,381		708		684
Asset-backed securities		930		692		915		635
Foreign government bonds		474		479		416		420
U.S. government authorities and agencies and obligations of U.S. states		121		114		147		143

Total fixed maturities		14,029		13,410		13,335		11,945
Equity securities		953		803		1,074		698

Total trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	$	15,535	$	14,766	$	15,641	$	13,875

The net change in unrealized gains (losses) from trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities still held at period end, recorded within “Asset management fees and other income” was $752 million and $(80) million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $997 million and $(336) million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Other Trading Account Assets

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s other trading account assets as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	$	6	$	6	$	7	$	7

Fixed maturities:
Asset-backed securities		1,695		1,622		423		308
Residential mortgage-backed securities		260		118		278		150
Corporate securities		257		244		230		204
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		213		120		217		136
U.S. government authorities and agencies and obligations of U.S. states		56		59		102		106
Foreign government bonds		32		33		32		33

Total fixed maturities		2,513		2,196		1,282		937
Derivative instruments and other		1,196		1,410		2,949		3,250
Equity securities		99		103		144		142

Total other trading account assets	$	3,814	$	3,715	$	4,382	$	4,336

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The net change in unrealized gains (losses) from other trading account assets still held at period end, recorded within “Asset management fees and other income” was $(24) million and $236 million during the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $(53) million and $(105) million during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was from the following sources:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale	$	2,024		$	2,104		$	4,124		$	4,219
Fixed maturities, held to maturity		37			22			68			45
Equity securities, available for sale		79			93			156			165
Trading account assets		196			198			393			402
Commercial mortgage and other loans		485			485			968			956
Policy loans		141			136			278			269
Broker-dealer related receivables		5			39			11			83
Short-term investments and cash equivalents		34			120			97			282
Other long-term investments		(52	)		53			(158	)		131

Gross investment income		2,949			3,250			5,937			6,552
Less: Investment expenses		(114	)		(224	)		(247	)		(500	)

Net investment income	$	2,835		$	3,026		$	5,690		$	6,052

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Realized Investment Gains (Losses), Net

Realized investment gains (losses), net, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were from the following sources:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on fixed maturities	$	(1,312	)	$	(661	)	$	(3,167	)	$	(1,200	)
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)		813			—			2,063			—

Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on fixed maturities recognized in earnings		(499	)		(661	)		(1,104	)		(1,200	)
Fixed maturities – all other		7			(16	)		253			97

Fixed maturities, net		(492	)		(677	)		(851	)		(1,103	)
Equity securities		(318	)		(210	)		(819	)		(359	)
Commercial mortgage and other loans		(209	)		(49	)		(329	)		(78	)
Investment real estate		(7	)		—			(21	)		—
Joint ventures and limited partnerships		(39	)		(15	)		(53	)		(15	)
Derivatives		(1,219	)		46			(69	)		(271	)
Other		9			7			12			16

Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	(2,275	)	$	(898	)	$	(2,130	)	$	(1,810	)

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)

Net unrealized investment gains and losses on securities classified as “available for sale” and certain other long-term investments and other assets are included in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),” or “AOCI.” Changes in these amounts include reclassification adjustments to exclude from “Other comprehensive income (loss)” those items that are included as part of “Net income” for a period that had been part of “Other comprehensive income (loss)” in earlier periods. The amounts for the periods indicated below, split between amounts related to fixed maturity securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized, and all other net unrealized investment gains and losses, are as follows:

Net Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized


	Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) On Investments			Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Valuation of Business Acquired		Future Policy Benefits			Policyholders’ Dividends		Deferred Income Tax (Liability) Benefit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Related To Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
	(in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Cumulative impact of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2		(1,139	)		9		1			—		388			(741	)
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period		175			—		—			—		(63	)		112
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income		725			—		—			—		(261	)		464
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(1)		(1,487	)		—		—			—		535			(952	)
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs and valuation of business acquired		—			234		—			—		(84	)		150
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits		—			—		(23	)		—		8			(15	)
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on policyholders’ dividends		—			—		—			—		—			—

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	(1,726	)	$	243	$	(22	)	$	—	$	523		$	(982	)

(1)	Represents “transfers in” related to the portion of OTTI losses recognized during the period that were not recognized in earnings for securities with no prior OTTI loss.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

All Other Net Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses in AOCI


	Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) On Investments(1)			Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Valuation of Business Acquired			Future Policy Benefits			Policyholders’ Dividends			Deferred Income Tax (Liability) Benefit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Related To Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
	(in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	(11,893	)	$	1,479		$	(384	)	$	431		$	3,632		$	(6,735	)
Cumulative impact of the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2		(322	)		15			4			418			(38	)		77
Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period		4,081			—			—			—			(1,320	)		2,761
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income		971			—			—			—			(350	)		621
Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(2)		1,487			—			—			—			(535	)		952
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs and valuation of business acquired		—			(880	)		—			—			308			(572	)
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on future policy benefits		—			—			202			—			(70	)		132
Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on policyholders’ dividends		—			—			—			(849	)		298			(551	)

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	(5,676	)	$	614		$	(178	)	$	—		$	1,925		$	(3,315	)

(1)	Includes cash flow hedges. See Note 14 for information on cash flow hedges.

(2)	Represents “transfers out” related to the portion of OTTI losses recognized during the period that were not recognized in earnings for securities with no prior OTTI loss.

The table below presents net unrealized gains (losses) on investments by asset class as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Fixed maturity securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized	$	(1,726	)	$	—
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale—all other		(5,436	)		(10,635	)
Equity securities, available for sale		(102	)		(1,223	)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges(1)		(273	)		(227	)
Other investments(2)		135			192

Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments	$	(7,402	)	$	(11,893	)

(1)	See Note 14 for more information on cash flow hedges.

(2)	Includes $237 million of net unrealized losses on held to maturity securities that were transferred from available-for-sale.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Duration of Gross Unrealized Loss Positions for Fixed Maturities

The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual fixed maturity securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009
	Less than twelve months(2)				Twelve months or more(2)				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities(1)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	1,949	$	175	$	36	$	5	$	1,985	$	180
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		57		2		2		—		59		2
Foreign government bonds		7,317		124		338		37		7,655		161
Corporate securities		16,233		1,374		28,751		4,456		44,984		5,830
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		2,391		263		6,476		885		8,867		1,148
Asset-backed securities		2,982		2,103		5,156		2,028		8,138		4,131
Residential mortgage-backed securities		2,448		52		1,199		139		3,647		191

Total	$	33,377	$	4,093	$	41,958	$	7,550	$	75,335	$	11,643

(1)	Includes $1,583 million of fair value and $136 million of gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2009 on securities classified as held to maturity, which are not reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income.

(2)	The month count for aging of unrealized losses was reset back to historical unrealized loss month counts for securities impacted by the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2.


	December 31, 2008
	Less than twelve months				Twelve months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities(1)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	994	$	13	$	—	$	—	$	994	$	13
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		299		11		7		1		306		12
Foreign government bonds		3,580		72		294		40		3,874		112
Corporate securities		36,549		4,508		17,707		5,224		54,256		9,732
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		6,537		1,380		3,407		954		9,944		2,334
Asset-backed securities		4,925		1,791		5,910		2,384		10,835		4,175
Residential mortgage-backed securities		824		109		1,557		128		2,381		237

Total	$	53,708	$	7,884	$	28,882	$	8,731	$	82,590	$	16,615

(1)	Includes $926 million of fair value and $133 million of gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2008 on securities classified as held to maturity, which are not reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are composed of $7,769 million and $12,863 million related to investment grade securities and $3,874 million and $3,752 million related to below investment grade securities, respectively. At June 30, 2009, $6,338 million of the gross unrealized losses represented declines in value of greater than 20%, $1,698 million of which had been in that position for less than six months, as compared to $11,505 million at December 31, 2008 that represented declines in value of greater than 20%, $10,509 million of which had been in that position for less than six months. At June 30, 2009, the $7,550 million of gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more were concentrated in asset-backed securities, manufacturing and services sectors of the Company’s corporate securities, and commercial mortgage-backed securities. At December 31, 2008, the $8,731 million of gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more were concentrated in asset-backed securities, and in the manufacturing and utilities sectors of the Company’s corporate securities. In accordance with its policy described in Note 2, the Company concluded that an adjustment to earnings for other-than-temporary impairments for these securities was not warranted at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008. These conclusions are based on a detailed analysis of the underlying credit and cashflows on each security. The gross unrealized losses are primarily attributable to credit spread widening and increased liquidity discounts. At June 30, 2009, the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis.

Duration of Gross Unrealized Loss Positions for Equity Securities

The following tables show the fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated by length of time that individual equity securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009
	Less than twelve months				Twelve months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(in millions)
Equity securities, available for sale	$	2,234	$	502	$	580	$	157	$	2,814	$	659


	December 31, 2008
	Less than twelve months				Twelve months or more				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
	(in millions)
Equity securities, available for sale	$	3,978	$	1,419	$	263	$	63	$	4,241	$	1,482

At June 30, 2009, $450 million of the gross unrealized losses represented declines of greater than 20%, $139 million of which had been in that position for less than six months. At December 31, 2008, $1,227 million of the gross unrealized losses represented declines of greater than 20%, $1,086 million of which had been in that position for less than six months. Securities with fair value of $580 million and $263 million and gross unrealized losses of $157 million and $63 million that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, represent perpetual preferred securities, which have characteristics of both debt and equity securities and to which an impairment model similar to the Company’s fixed maturities is applied. In accordance with its policy described in Note 2, the Company concluded that an adjustment for other-than-temporary impairments for these securities was not warranted at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

5. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

In the normal course of its activities, the Company enters into relationships with various special purpose entities and other entities that are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”), in accordance with FIN No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” A VIE is an entity that either (1) has equity investors that lack certain essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest (including the ability to control the entity, the obligation to absorb the entity’s expected losses and the right to receive the entity’s expected residual returns) or (2) lacks sufficient equity to finance its own activities without financial support provided by other entities, which in turn would be expected to absorb at least some of the expected losses of the VIE. If the Company determines that it stands to absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses or to receive a majority of the VIE’s expected residual returns, the Company would be deemed to be the VIE’s “primary beneficiary” and would be required to consolidate the VIE.

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities for which the Company is the Sponsor

The Company is the sponsor of certain asset-backed investment vehicles (commonly referred to as collateralized debt obligations, or “CDOs”) and certain other vehicles for which the Company earns fee income for investment management services, including certain investment structures which the Company’s asset management business invests with other co-investors in investment funds referred to as feeder funds. The Company sells or syndicates investments through these vehicles, principally as part of the proprietary investing activity of the Company’s asset management businesses. Additionally, the Company may invest in debt or equity securities issued by these vehicles. CDOs raise capital by issuing debt securities, and use the proceeds to purchase investments, typically interest-bearing financial instruments. The Company analyzes these relationships to determine whether or not it absorbs the majority of expected losses or receives the majority of the expected residual returns, and thus is the primary beneficiary. This analysis includes a review of the Company’s size and relative position in the capital structure and/or a review of cash flow projections driven by assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rate, recovery rate, deal call probability, reinvestment rates and fees and expenses. The Company has not provided material financial or other support that was not contractually required to any VIE for which it is the sponsor.

The Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs that it sponsors, including one CDO and certain other investment structures, as it absorbs a majority of the expected losses or receives the majority of the expected residual returns. These VIEs are consolidated and reflected in the table below. The table below reflects the carrying amount and balance sheet caption in which the assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which the Company is the sponsor are reported. The creditors of these VIEs do not have recourse to the Company in excess of the assets contained within the VIE.


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale	$	26	$	29
Commercial mortgages and other loans		424		450
Other long-term investments		11		100
Cash and cash equivalents		33		1
Accrued investment income		2		2
Other assets		4		5
Separate account assets		72		91

Total assets of consolidated VIEs	$	572	$	678

Other liabilities	$	413	$	424
Separate account liabilities		72		91

Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs	$	485	$	515

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities for which the Company is the Sponsor

The Company has also determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs that it sponsors, including certain CDOs and other investment structures, as it will not absorb a majority of the expected losses or receive the majority of the expected residual returns. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss resulting from its relationship with unconsolidated VIEs it sponsors is limited to its investment in the VIEs, which was $401 million and $674 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss decreased from December 31, 2008, reflecting the redemption of a fixed income fund as of June 30, 2009. These investments are reflected in “Fixed maturities, available for sale” and “Other long-term investments.” The fair value of assets held within these unconsolidated VIEs was $6,556 million and $5,916 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. There are no liabilities associated with these unconsolidated VIEs on the Company’s balance sheet.

Consolidated Variable Interest Entities for which the Company is not the Sponsor

The Company is the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs in which the Company has invested, as part of its investment activities, but over which the Company does not exercise control and is not the sponsor. Included among these structured investments are structured investments issued by a VIE that manages yen-denominated investments coupled with cross-currency coupon swap agreements thereby creating synthetic dual currency investments. The Company’s position in the capital structure and/or relative size indicates that the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company has not provided material financial or other support that was not contractually required to these VIEs. The table below reflects the carrying amount and balance sheet caption in which the assets of consolidated VIEs for which the Company is not the sponsor are reported. The liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which the Company is not the sponsor are included in “Other liabilities” and are also reflected in the table below. These liabilities primarily comprise obligations under debt instruments issued by the VIEs that are non-recourse to the Company. The creditors of each consolidated VIE have recourse only to the assets of that VIE. As reflected in the table below, total assets of consolidated VIEs for which the Company is not a sponsor decreased from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009, reflecting the deconsolidation of a VIE that manages investments in the European market. The assets held by the VIE were distributed to the Company during March 2009.


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale	$	103	$	124
Fixed maturities, held to maturity		951		1,012
Other trading account assets		—		404
Other long-term investments		6		43
Cash and cash equivalents		2		79
Accrued investment income		4		8
Other assets		—		55

Total assets of consolidated VIEs	$	1,066	$	1,725

Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs	$	19	$	61

In addition, not reflected in the table above, the Company has created a trust that is a VIE, to facilitate Prudential Insurance’s Funding Agreement Notes Issuance Program (“FANIP”). The trust issues medium-term notes secured by funding agreements issued to the trust by Prudential Insurance with the proceeds of such notes. The trust is the beneficiary of an indemnity agreement with the Company that provides that the Company is responsible for costs related to the notes issued with limited exception. As a result, the Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of the trust, which is therefore consolidated.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The funding agreements represent an intercompany transaction that is eliminated upon consolidation. However, in recognition of the security interest in such funding agreements, the trust’s medium-term note liability of $6,678 million and $7,130 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, is classified within “Policyholders’ account balances.” Creditors of the trust have recourse to Prudential Insurance if the trust fails to make contractual payments on the medium-term notes. The Company has not provided material financial or other support that was not contractually required to the trust.

Significant Variable Interests in Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities for which the Company is not the Sponsor

In addition, in the normal course of its activities, the Company will invest in structured investments including VIEs for which it is not the sponsor. These structured investments typically invest in fixed income investments and are managed by third parties and include asset-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage-backed securities. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss on these structured investments, both VIEs and non-VIEs, is limited to the amount of its investment. The Company has not provided material financial or other support that was not contractually required to these structures. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these structures due to its relative size and position in the capital structure of these entities.

Included among these structured investments are asset-backed securities issued by VIEs that manage investments in the European market. In addition to a stated coupon, each investment provides a return based on the VIE’s portfolio of assets and related investment activity. The market value of these VIEs was approximately $8 billion as of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and these VIEs were financed primarily through the issuance of notes similar to those purchased by the Company. The Company generally accounts for these investments as available for sale fixed maturities containing embedded derivatives that are bifurcated and marked-to-market through “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” based upon the change in value of the underlying portfolio. The Company’s variable interest in each of these VIEs represents less than 50% of the only class of variable interests issued by the VIE. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these interests was $1,079 million and $1,095 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, which includes the fair value of the embedded derivatives.

6. CLOSED BLOCK

On the date of demutualization, Prudential Insurance established a Closed Block for certain individual life insurance policies and annuities issued by Prudential Insurance in the U.S. The recorded assets and liabilities were allocated to the Closed Block at their historical carrying amounts. The Closed Block forms the principal component of the Closed Block Business.

The policies included in the Closed Block are specified individual life insurance policies and individual annuity contracts that were in force on the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization and for which Prudential Insurance is currently paying or expects to pay experience-based policy dividends. Assets have been allocated to the Closed Block in an amount that has been determined to produce cash flows which, together with revenues from policies included in the Closed Block, are expected to be sufficient to support obligations and liabilities relating to these policies, including provision for payment of benefits, certain expenses, and taxes and to provide for continuation of the policyholder dividend scales in effect in 2000, assuming experience underlying such scales continues. To the extent that, over time, cash flows from the assets allocated to the Closed Block and claims and other experience related to the Closed Block are, in the aggregate, more or less favorable than what was assumed when the Closed Block was established, total dividends paid to Closed Block policyholders in the

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

future may be greater than or less than the total dividends that would have been paid to these policyholders if the policyholder dividend scales in effect in 2000 had been continued. Any cash flows in excess of amounts assumed will be available for distribution over time to Closed Block policyholders and will not be available to stockholders. If the Closed Block has insufficient funds to make guaranteed policy benefit payments, such payments will be made from assets outside of the Closed Block. The Closed Block will continue in effect as long as any policy in the Closed Block remains in force unless, with the consent of the New Jersey insurance regulator, it is terminated earlier.

The excess of Closed Block Liabilities over Closed Block Assets at the date of the demutualization (adjusted to eliminate the impact of related amounts in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)”) represented the estimated maximum future earnings at that date from the Closed Block expected to result from operations attributed to the Closed Block after income taxes. In establishing the Closed Block, the Company developed an actuarial calculation of the timing of such maximum future earnings. If actual cumulative earnings of the Closed Block from inception through the end of any given period are greater than the expected cumulative earnings, only the expected earnings will be recognized in income. Any excess of actual cumulative earnings over expected cumulative earnings will represent undistributed accumulated earnings attributable to policyholders, which are recorded as a policyholder dividend obligation. The policyholder dividend obligation represents amounts to be paid to Closed Block policyholders as an additional policyholder dividend unless otherwise offset by future Closed Block performance that is less favorable than originally expected. If the actual cumulative earnings of the Closed Block from its inception through the end of any given period are less than the expected cumulative earnings of the Closed Block, the Company will recognize only the actual earnings in income. However, the Company may reduce policyholder dividend scales in the future, which would be intended to increase future actual earnings until the actual cumulative earnings equaled the expected cumulative earnings. As of January 1, 2009, the Company recognized an adjusted policyholder dividend obligation of $851 million to Closed Block policyholders for the excess of actual cumulative earnings over the expected cumulative earnings, which reflects a cumulative adjustment of $418 million related to the Company’s adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” effective January 1, 2009. See Note 2 for more information on the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2. As of June 30, 2009, actual cumulative earnings fell below the expected cumulative earnings by $622 million, thereby eliminating the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation. Furthermore, due to the accumulation of net unrealized investment losses that have arisen subsequent to the establishment of the Closed Block, the policyholder dividend obligation balance as of December 31, 2008 was reduced to zero through “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” and remains at zero as of June 30, 2009. See the table below for changes in the components of the policyholder dividend obligation for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Closed Block Liabilities and Assets designated to the Closed Block, as well as maximum future earnings to be recognized from Closed Block Liabilities and Closed Block Assets, are as follows:


	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Closed Block Liabilities
Future policy benefits	$	51,720		$	51,763
Policyholders’ dividends payable		1,039			1,036
Policyholder dividend obligation		—			—
Policyholders’ account balances		5,597			5,622
Other Closed Block liabilities		5,795			5,724

Total Closed Block Liabilities		64,151			64,145

Closed Block Assets
Fixed maturities, available for sale, at fair value		35,984			35,345
Other trading account assets, at fair value		163			120
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value		2,468			2,354
Commercial mortgage and other loans		8,087			8,129
Policy loans		5,443			5,423
Other long-term investments		1,584			1,676
Short-term investments		1,234			1,340

Total investments		54,963			54,387
Cash and cash equivalents		1,596			1,779
Accrued investment income		612			615
Other Closed Block assets		428			409

Total Closed Block Assets		57,599			57,190

Excess of reported Closed Block Liabilities over Closed Block Assets		6,552			6,955
Portion of above representing accumulated other comprehensive income:
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)		(2,911	)		(4,371	)
Allocated to policyholder dividend obligation		—			433

Future earnings to be recognized from Closed Block Assets and Closed Block Liabilities	$	3,641		$	3,017

Information regarding the policyholder dividend obligation is as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	(in millions)
Balance, January 1, 2009	$	—
Impact from earnings allocable to policyholder dividend obligation		(851	)
Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) allocated to policyholder dividend obligation		851

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Closed Block revenues and benefits and expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums	$	867		$	965		$	1,640		$	1,821
Net investment income		710			800			1,428			1,641
Realized investment gains (losses), net		(820	)		(349	)		(1,228	)		(444	)
Other income		37			8			52			27

Total Closed Block revenues		794			1,424			1,892			3,045

Benefits and Expenses
Policyholders’ benefits		992			1,093			1,904			2,065
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		35			35			70			70
Dividends to policyholders		253			155			256			657
General and administrative expenses		143			160			288			332

Total Closed Block benefits and expenses		1,423			1,443			2,518			3,124

Closed Block revenues, net of Closed Block benefits and expenses, before income taxes and discontinued operations		(629	)		(19	)		(626	)		(79	)

Income tax expense (benefit)		(7	)		(9	)		(2	)		(61	)

Closed Block revenues, net of Closed Block benefits and expenses and income taxes, before discontinued operations		(622	)		(10	)		(624	)		(18	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			—			—

Closed Block revenues, net of Closed Block benefits and expenses, income taxes and discontinued operations	$	(622	)	$	(10	)	$	(624	)	$	(18	)

7. EQUITY

The Company has outstanding two classes of common stock: the Common Stock and the Class B Stock. The changes in the number of shares issued, held in treasury and outstanding are as follows for the periods indicated:


	Common Stock				Class B Stock
	Issued	Held In Treasury		Outstanding	Issued and Outstanding
	(in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2008	604.9	183.6		421.3	2.0
Common Stock issued(1)	36.9	—		36.9	—
Common Stock acquired	—	—		—	—
Stock-based compensation programs(2)	—	(2.3	)	2.3	—

Balance, June 30, 2009	641.8	181.3		460.5	2.0

(1)	In June 2009, the Company issued 36,858,975 shares of Common Stock in a public offering at a price of $39.00 per share for net proceeds of $1.391 billion.

(2)	Represents net shares issued from treasury pursuant to the Company’s stock-based compensation programs.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Net income	$	180		$	589		$	183		$	673
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes:
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments		188			9			(140	)		260
Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)(1)		3,369			(926	)		3,102			(2,164	)
Change in pension and postretirement unrecognized net periodic benefit		9			12			18			11

Other comprehensive income (loss)(2)		3,566			(905	)		2,980			(1,893	)

Comprehensive income (loss)		3,746			(316	)		3,163			(1,220	)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		(32	)		(9	)		19			(31	)

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc.	$	3,714		$	(325	)	$	3,182		$	(1,251	)

(1)	Includes cash flow hedges of $(55) million and $23 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and $(30) million and $(53) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)	Amounts are net of tax expense (benefit) of $1,719 million and $(625) million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and $1,492 million and $(1,156) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The balance of and changes in each component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc.” for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are as follows (net of taxes):


	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc.
	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)(1)			Pension and Postretirement Unrecognized Net Periodic Benefit (Cost)			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(Loss)
	(in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	375		$	(6,735	)	$	(983	)	$	(7,343	)
Change in component during period		(115	)		3,102			18			3,005
Impact of adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2(2)		—			(664	)		—			(664	)

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	260		$	(4,297	)	$	(965	)	$	(5,002	)

(1)	Includes cash flow hedges of $(177) million and $(147) million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

(2)	See Note 2 for additional information on the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2.

8. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company has outstanding two separate classes of common stock. The Common Stock reflects the performance of the Financial Services Businesses and the Class B Stock reflects the performance of the Closed Block Business. Accordingly, earnings per share is calculated separately for each of these two classes of common stock.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Net income for the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business is determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes general and administrative expenses charged to each of the respective businesses based on the Company’s methodology for the allocation of such expenses. Cash flows between the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business related to administrative expenses are determined by a policy servicing fee arrangement that is based upon insurance and policies in force and statutory cash premiums. To the extent reported administrative expenses vary from these cash flow amounts, the differences are recorded, on an after tax basis, as direct equity adjustments to the equity balances of the businesses.

The direct equity adjustments modify the earnings available to each of the classes of common stock for earnings per share purposes.

Common Stock

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations is as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009					2008
	Income		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount		Income		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Basic earnings per share
Income from continuing operations attributable to the Financial Services Businesses	$	534				$	577
Direct equity adjustment		11					14
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests		17					8
Less: Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards		6					4

Income from continuing operations attributable to the Financial Services Businesses available to holders of Common Stock after direct equity adjustment	$	522	432.9	$	1.21	$	579	431.9	$	1.34

Add: Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards—Basic	$	6				$	4
Less: Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards—Diluted		6					4

Effect of dilutive securities and compensation programs
Stock options			1.1					3.6
Deferred and long-term compensation programs			0.3					1.0

Diluted earnings per share
Income from continuing operations attributable to the Financial Services Businesses available to holders of Common Stock after direct equity adjustment	$	522	434.3	$	1.20	$	579	436.5	$	1.33

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009					2008
	Income		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount		Income		Weighted Average Shares	Per Share Amount
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Basic earnings per share
Income from continuing operations attributable to the Financial Services Businesses	$	517				$	667
Direct equity adjustment		22					26
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests		6					32
Less: Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards		6					4

Income from continuing operations attributable to the Financial Services Businesses available to holders of Common Stock after direct equity adjustment	$	527	427.5	$	1.23	$	657	437.0	$	1.50

Add: Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards—Basic	$	6				$	4
Less: Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards—Diluted		6					4

Effect of dilutive securities and compensation programs
Stock options			0.6					3.7
Deferred and long-term compensation programs			0.6					0.9

Diluted earnings per share
Income from continuing operations attributable to the Financial Services Businesses available to holders of Common Stock after direct equity adjustment	$	527	428.7	$	1.23	$	657	441.6	$	1.49

Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Under this method, earnings of the Financial Services Businesses attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. are allocated between Common Stock and the participating awards, as if the awards were a second class of stock. Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was based on 5.3 million and 2.6 million of such awards, respectively, weighted for the period they were outstanding. Earnings allocated to participating unvested share-based payment awards for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was based on 4.7 million and 2.7 million of such awards, respectively, weighted for the period they were outstanding. The computation of earnings per share of Common Stock excludes the dilutive impact of participating unvested share-based awards based on the application of the two-class method.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, 12.8 million and 7.0 million options, respectively, weighted for the portion of the period they were outstanding, with a weighted average exercise price of $67.15 and $79.62 per share, respectively were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options, based on application of the treasury stock method, were antidilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, 16.0 million and 5.6 million options, respectively, weighted for the portion of the period they were outstanding, with a weighted average exercise price of $59.67 and $81.03 per share, respectively were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options, based on application of the treasury stock method, were antidilutive.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company’s convertible senior notes provide for the Company to issue shares of its Common Stock as a component of the conversion of the notes. As of June 30, 2009, $4 million of senior notes related to the $2.0 billion December 2006 issuance remain outstanding. These will be dilutive to earnings per share if the average market price of the Common Stock for a particular period is above the initial conversion price of $104.21. As of June 30, 2009, $83 million of senior notes related to the $3.0 billion December 2007 issuance remain outstanding. These senior notes will be dilutive to earnings per share if the average market price of the Common Stock for a particular period is above the initial conversion price of $132.39. See Note 9 for additional information regarding the convertible senior notes.

Class B Stock

Income (loss) from continuing operations per share of Class B Stock was $(193.00) and $0.50 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $(189.00) and $(9.50) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Closed Block Business available to holders of Class B Stock after direct equity adjustment for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $(386) million and $1 million, respectively. The direct equity adjustment resulted in a decrease in the income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Closed Block Business applicable to holders of Class B Stock for earnings per share purposes of $11 million and $14 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Closed Block Business available to holders of Class B Stock after direct equity adjustment for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $(378) million and $(19) million, respectively. The direct equity adjustment resulted in a decrease in the income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the Closed Block Business applicable to holders of Class B Stock for earnings per share purposes of $22 million and $26 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average number of shares of Class B Stock used in the calculation of earnings per share amounted to 2.0 million. There are no potentially dilutive shares associated with the Class B Stock.

9. SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM DEBT

Commercial Paper

Prudential Financial has a commercial paper program rated A-1 by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (“S&P”), P-2 by Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) and F2 by Fitch Ratings Ltd. (“Fitch”) as of June 30, 2009. Prudential Financial’s outstanding commercial paper borrowings were $505 million and $1,243 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Prudential Funding, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Insurance, has a commercial paper program, rated A-1+ by S&P, P-1 by Moody’s and F1 by Fitch as of June 30, 2009. Prudential Funding’s outstanding commercial paper and master note borrowings were $1,718 million and $4,354 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Prudential Financial has issued a subordinated guarantee covering Prudential Funding’s domestic commercial paper program.

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the weighted average maturity of the total commercial paper outstanding was 32 and 29 days, respectively.

Both Prudential Financial’s and Prudential Funding’s commercial paper programs were granted approval during the fourth quarter of 2008 to participate in the Commercial Paper Funding Facility (“CPFF”) sponsored by

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Commercial paper programs must maintain ratings of at least A-1/P-1/F1 by at least two rating agencies in order to be eligible for the CPFF. As of June 30, 2009, neither Prudential Financial nor Prudential Funding had any commercial paper outstanding under the CPFF. On February 19, 2009, the commercial paper credit rating of Prudential Financial was downgraded by Fitch from F1 to F2. Consequently, as of that date, Prudential Financial became ineligible to issue commercial paper under the CPFF. Prudential Funding continues to be eligible based on its current credit ratings to sell to the CPFF three-month unsecured U.S. dollar denominated commercial paper up to a maximum of $9.815 billion, less the outstanding amount of any non-CPFF commercial paper at any applicable time. Access to the CPFF for the issuance of new commercial paper is scheduled to terminate on February 1, 2010, unless such date is extended by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Convertible Senior Notes

On December 12, 2007, Prudential Financial issued in a private placement $3.0 billion of floating rate convertible senior notes that are convertible by the holders at any time after issuance into cash and shares of Prudential Financial’s Common Stock. The conversion price, $132.39 per share, is subject to adjustment upon certain corporate events. The conversion feature requires net settlement in shares; therefore, upon conversion, a holder would receive cash up to the par amount of the convertible notes surrendered for conversion and shares of Prudential Financial Common Stock only for the portion of the settlement amount in excess of the par amount, if any. These notes are redeemable by Prudential Financial, at par plus accrued interest, on or after June 16, 2009. Holders of the notes may also require Prudential Financial to repurchase the notes, at par plus accrued interest, on contractually specified dates, of which the first such date was June 15, 2009. On June 15, 2009, $1,819 million of these notes were repurchased by Prudential Financial as required by the holders. The next date on which holders of these notes may require Prudential Financial to repurchase these notes is December 15, 2009. Separately, during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, the Company repurchased, in individually negotiated transactions, $853 million and $245 million, respectively, of these notes which were offered to the Company by certain holders. These notes were repurchased at a discount resulting in a pre-tax gain of $7 million that is recorded within “Asset management fees and other income.” As of June 30, 2009, $83 million of these floating rate convertible senior notes remain outstanding. In addition, as of June 30, 2009, $4 million of floating rate convertible senior notes that were issued by Prudential Financial in a private placement in December 2006 remain outstanding. The next date on which holders of these notes may require Prudential Financial to repurchase these notes is December 12, 2009.

Medium-term Notes

In June 2009, Prudential Financial issued $250 million of 6.20% medium-term notes due January 2015 and $750 million of 7.375% medium-term notes due June 2019 under its shelf registration statement.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York

Prudential Insurance has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) since June 2008. Membership allows Prudential Insurance access to collateralized advances, collateralized funding agreements, and other FHLBNY products. Collateralized advances from the FHLBNY are classified in “Short-term debt” or “Long-term debt,” depending on the maturity date of the obligation. Collateralized funding agreements issued to the FHLBNY are classified in “Policyholders’ account balances.” These funding agreements have priority claim status above debt holders of Prudential Insurance.

Prudential Insurance’s membership in FHLBNY requires the ownership of member stock, and borrowings from FHLBNY require the purchase of FHLBNY activity based stock in an amount equal to 4.5% of the

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

outstanding borrowings. All FHLBNY stock purchased by Prudential Insurance is classified as restricted general account investments within “Other long-term investments,” and the carrying value of these investments was $221 million as of June 30, 2009.

The FHLBNY requires Prudential Insurance to pledge qualifying mortgage-related assets or U.S. Treasury securities as collateral for all borrowings. On May 8, 2009, the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (“NJDOBI”) revised its prior guidance to increase the maximum amount of qualifying assets that Prudential Insurance may pledge as collateral to the FHLBNY from 5% to 7% of its prior year-end statutory net admitted assets exclusive of separate account assets; however, this limitation resets to 5% on December 31, 2010 unless extended by NJDOBI. Based on its statutory net admitted assets as of December 31, 2008, the 7% limitation equates to a maximum amount of pledged assets of $10.5 billion and an estimated maximum borrowing capacity, after taking into account applicable required collateralization levels and required purchases of activity based FHLBNY stock, of approximately $9.0 billion. However, the ability to borrow from the FHLBNY is subject to the availability and maintenance of qualifying assets at Prudential Insurance, and there is no assurance that Prudential Insurance will have sufficient qualifying assets available to it in order to access the increased capacity in full at any particular time. Also, the revised guidance from NJDOBI limits the aggregate amount of assets Prudential Insurance may pledge for all loans, including borrowings from the FHLBNY, to 10% of its prior year-end statutory net admitted assets exclusive of separate account assets; however, this limitation excludes certain activities, such as asset-based financing transactions.

The fair value of the qualifying assets pledged as collateral by Prudential Insurance must be maintained at certain specified levels of the borrowed amount, which can vary, depending on the nature of the assets pledged. As of June 30, 2009, Prudential Insurance had pledged qualifying assets with a fair value of $7,439 million, which is above the minimum level required by the FHLBNY, and had total outstanding borrowings of $3.5 billion. The total borrowings from the FHLBNY as of June 30, 2009, is comprised of collateralized advances, of which $1.0 billion is reflected in “Short-term debt” and $1.0 billion is reflected in “Long-term debt,” as well as $1.5 billion of collateralized funding agreements that are reflected in “Policyholders’ account balances.”

TALF Borrowings

During the first six months of 2009, the Company purchased securities under the Federal Reserve’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (“TALF”). TALF provides secured financing for asset-backed securities backed by certain types of consumer and small business loans and as of July 2009 for certain high-quality commercial mortgage-backed securities issued before January 1, 2009. TALF financing is non-recourse to the borrower, is collateralized by the purchased securities and provides financing for the purchase price of the securities, less a ‘haircut’ that varies based on the type of collateral. Borrowers under the program can deliver the collateralized securities to a special purpose vehicle created by the Federal Reserve in full defeasance of the loan.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company has $1,250 million of securities purchased under TALF that are reflected within “Other trading account assets,” and has $1,167 million of secured financing from the Federal Reserve related to the purchase of these securities that is reflected within “Long-term debt.” The Company is carrying the securities at fair value as SFAS No. 115 trading assets and the loan at fair value under the fair value option afforded by SFAS No. 159.

10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has funded and non-funded contributory and non-contributory defined benefit pension plans, which cover substantially all of its employees. For some employees, benefits are based on final average earnings and length of service, while benefits for other employees are based on an account balance that takes into consideration age, service and earnings during their career.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for its retired employees, their beneficiaries and covered dependents (“other postretirement benefits”). The health care plan is contributory; the life insurance plan is non-contributory. Substantially all of the Company’s U.S. employees may become eligible to receive other postretirement benefits if they retire after age 55 with at least 10 years of service or under certain circumstances after age 50 with at least 20 years of continuous service. The Company has elected to amortize its transition obligation for other postretirement benefits over 20 years.

Net periodic (benefit) cost included in “General and administrative expenses” includes the following components:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Components of net periodic (benefit) cost
Service cost	$	41		$	38		$	3		$	3
Interest cost		115			117			29			31
Expected return on plan assets		(182	)		(180	)		(27	)		(40	)
Amortization of prior service cost		7			11			(3	)		(3	)
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss, net		8			4			11			—
Special termination benefits		—			—			—			—

Net periodic (benefit) cost	$	(11	)	$	(10	)	$	13		$	(9	)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Components of net periodic (benefit) cost
Service cost	$	82		$	77		$	6		$	6
Interest cost		230			234			58			62
Expected return on plan assets		(364	)		(360	)		(54	)		(80	)
Amortization of prior service cost		14			22			(6	)		(6	)
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss, net		16			8			22			—
Special termination benefits		—			2			—			—

Net periodic (benefit) cost	$	(22	)	$	(17	)	$	26		$	(18	)

11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Segments

The Company has organized its principal operations into the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. Within the Financial Services Businesses, the Company operates through three divisions, which together encompass seven reportable segments. The Company’s real estate and relocation services business as well as businesses that are not sufficiently material to warrant separate disclosure and businesses to be divested, including the Company’s investment in Wachovia Securities, are included in Corporate and Other operations within the Financial Services Businesses. Collectively, the businesses that comprise the three operating divisions and Corporate and Other are referred to as the Financial Services Businesses.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Adjusted Operating Income

In managing the Financial Services Businesses, the Company analyzes the operating performance of each segment using “adjusted operating income.” Adjusted operating income does not equate to “income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures” or “net income” as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP but is the measure of segment profit or loss used by the Company to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources, and consistent with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” is the measure of segment performance presented below.

Adjusted operating income is calculated by adjusting each segment’s “income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures” for the following items, which are described in greater detail below:

•

realized investment gains (losses), net, and related charges and adjustments;

•

net investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities and changes in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes;

•

the contribution to income/loss of divested businesses that have been or will be sold or exited but that did not qualify for “discontinued operations” accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP; and

•

equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

These items are important to an understanding of overall results of operations. Adjusted operating income is not a substitute for income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and the Company’s definition of adjusted operating income may differ from that used by other companies. However, the Company believes that the presentation of adjusted operating income as measured for management purposes enhances the understanding of results of operations by highlighting the results from ongoing operations and the underlying profitability factors of the Financial Services Businesses.

Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related charges and adjustments. Adjusted operating income excludes realized investment gains (losses), net, except as indicated below. A significant element of realized investment gains and losses are impairments and credit-related and interest rate-related gains and losses from sales of securities. Impairments and losses from sales of credit-impaired securities, the timing of which depends largely on market credit cycles, can vary considerably across periods. The timing of other sales that would result in gains or losses, such as interest rate-related gains or losses, is largely subject to the Company’s discretion and influenced by market opportunities, as well as the Company’s tax and capital profile. Trends in the underlying profitability of the Company’s businesses can be more clearly identified without the fluctuating effects of these transactions.

Charges that relate to realized investment gains (losses), net, are also excluded from adjusted operating income. The related charges are associated with: policyholder dividends; amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, valuation of business acquired (“VOBA”), unearned revenue reserves and deferred sales inducements; interest credited to policyholders’ account balances; reserves for future policy benefits; and payments associated with the market value adjustment features related to certain of the annuity products the Company sells. The related charges associated with policyholder dividends include a percentage of the net increase in the fair value of specified assets included in Gibraltar Life’s reorganization plan that is required to be paid as a special dividend to Gibraltar Life policyholders. Deferred policy acquisition costs, VOBA, unearned revenue reserves and deferred sales inducements for certain products are amortized based on estimated gross profits, which include net realized investment gains and losses on the underlying invested assets. The related charge for these items represents the portion of this amortization associated with net realized investment gains and losses. The related charges for interest credited to policyholders’ account balances relate to certain group life policies that pass back certain realized investment gains and losses to the policyholder. The reserves for certain

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

policies are adjusted when cash flows related to these policies are affected by net realized investment gains and losses, and the related charge for reserves for future policy benefits represents that adjustment. Certain of the Company’s annuity products contain a market value adjustment feature that requires us to pay to the contractholder or entitles us to receive from the contractholder, upon surrender, a market value adjustment based on the crediting rates on the contract surrendered compared to crediting rates on newly issued contracts or based on an index rate at the time of purchase compared to an index rate at time of surrender, as applicable. These payments mitigate the net realized investment gains or losses incurred upon the disposition of the underlying invested assets. The related charge represents the payments or receipts associated with these market value adjustment features.

Adjustments to “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” for purposes of calculating adjusted operating income, include the following:

Gains and losses pertaining to derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, other than derivatives used in the Company’s capacity as a broker or dealer, are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” This includes mark-to-market adjustments of open contracts as well as periodic settlements. As discussed further below, adjusted operating income includes a portion of realized gains and losses pertaining to certain derivative contracts.

Adjusted operating income of the International Insurance segment and International Investments segment, excluding the global commodities group, reflect the impact of an intercompany arrangement with Corporate and Other operations pursuant to which the segments’ non-U.S. dollar denominated earnings in all countries for a particular year, including its interim reporting periods, are translated at fixed currency exchange rates. The fixed rates are determined in connection with a currency hedging program designed to mitigate the risk that unfavorable rate changes will reduce the segments’ U.S. dollar equivalent earnings. Pursuant to this program, the Company’s Corporate and Other operations execute forward currency contracts with third parties to sell the net exposure of projected earnings from the hedged currency in exchange for U.S. dollars at a specified exchange rate. The maturities of these contracts correspond with the future periods in which the identified non-U.S. dollar denominated earnings are expected to be generated. These contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP and, as noted above, all resulting profits or losses from such contracts are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” When the contracts are terminated in the same period that the expected earnings emerge, the resulting positive or negative cash flow effect is included in adjusted operating income (net gains of $8 million and $3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and net gains of $13 million and $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively). As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the fair value of open contracts used for this purpose was a net asset of $38 million and a net asset of $85 million, respectively.

The Company uses interest rate and currency swaps and other derivatives to manage interest and currency exchange rate exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities, including duration mismatches. For the derivative contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, mark-to-market adjustments of open contracts as well as periodic settlements are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” However, the periodic swap settlements, as well as other derivative related yield adjustments, are included in adjusted operating income to reflect the after-hedge yield of the underlying instruments. In certain instances, when these derivative contracts are terminated or offset before their final maturity, the resulting realized gains or losses recorded within “Realized investment gains (losses), net” are recognized in adjusted operating income over periods that generally approximate the expected terms of the derivatives or underlying instruments in order for adjusted operating income to reflect the after-hedge yield of the underlying instruments. Adjusted operating income includes net gains of $31 million and $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due to periodic settlements and yield adjustments of such contracts, and includes net gains of $5 million and net losses of $6 million, respectively, related to derivative contracts that were terminated or offset in

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

prior periods. Adjusted operating income includes net gains of $57 million and $29 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, due to periodic settlements and yield adjustments of such contracts, and includes net gains of $11 million and net losses of $8 million, respectively, related to derivative contracts that were terminated or offset in prior periods. The table below reflects the total deferred gain (loss) related to derivative contracts that were terminated or offset in prior periods that will be recognized in adjusted operating income in future periods for each segment, as well as the weighted average period over which these deferred amounts will be recognized.


	As of June 30, 2009
Segment	Deferred amount			Weighted average period
	(in millions)
International Insurance	$	767		32 years
Corporate and Other		(62	)	8 years

Total deferred gain (loss)	$	705

Certain products the Company sells are accounted for as freestanding derivatives or contain embedded derivatives. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives, along with any fees received or payments made relating to the derivative, are recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” These “Realized investment gains (losses), net” are included in adjusted operating income in the period in which the gain or loss is recorded. In addition, the changes in fair value of any associated derivative portfolio that is part of an economic hedging program related to the risk of these products (but which do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP) are also included in adjusted operating income in the period in which the gains or losses on the derivative portfolio are recorded. Adjusted operating income includes net losses of $487 million and $2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and net gains of $858 million and net losses of $45 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to these products and any associated derivative portfolio.

Adjustments are also made for the purposes of calculating adjusted operating income for the following items:

The Company conducts certain activities for which “Realized investment gains (losses), net” are a principal source of earnings for its businesses and therefore included in adjusted operating income, particularly within the Company’s Asset Management segment. For example, Asset Management’s proprietary investing business makes investments for sale or syndication to other investors or for placement or co-investment in the Company’s managed funds and structured products. The “Realized investment gains (losses), net” associated with the sale of these proprietary investments, as well as related derivative results, are a principal activity for this business and included in adjusted operating income. In addition, the “Realized investment gains (losses), net” associated with loans originated by the Company’s commercial mortgage operations, as well as related derivative results and retained mortgage servicing rights, are a principal activity for this business and included in adjusted operating income. Net realized investment losses of $94 million and $44 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $142 million and of $83 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to these and other businesses were included in adjusted operating income as an adjustment to “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”

The Company has certain investments in its general account portfolios that are classified as trading. These trading investments are carried at fair value and included in “Other trading account assets, at fair value” on the Company’s statements of financial position. Realized and unrealized gains and losses for these investments are recorded in “Asset management fees and other income,” and interest and dividend income for these investments is recorded in “Net investment income.” Consistent with the exclusion of realized investment gains and losses with respect to other investments managed on a consistent basis, the net gains or losses on these investments, which is recorded within “Asset management fees and other income,” is excluded from adjusted operating income and is reflected as an

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

adjustment to “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” In addition, the secured financing received from the Federal Reserve under TALF that is reflected within “Long-term debt,” is carried at fair value under the fair value option afforded by SFAS No. 159. The changes in the fair value of this debt, which is recorded within “Asset management fees and other income,” is also excluded from adjusted operating income and are reflected as an adjustment to “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” This is consistent with the securities purchased with the proceeds from this financing, which are carried at fair value and included in “Other trading account assets, at fair value” as discussed above. The net impact of these adjustments was net gains of $23 million and $15 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and net losses of $17 million and net gains of $18 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company has certain assets and liabilities for which, under GAAP, the change in value due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates during the period is recorded in “Asset management fees and other income.” To the extent the foreign currency exposure on these assets and liabilities is economically hedged, the change in value included in “Asset management fees and other income” is excluded from adjusted operating income and is reflected as an adjustment to “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” These adjustments were net losses of $19 million and $18 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and net gains of $59 million and $47 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities and changes in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes. Certain products included in the Retirement and International Insurance segments, are experience-rated in that investment results associated with these products are expected to ultimately accrue to contractholders. The investments supporting these experience-rated products, excluding commercial mortgage and other loans, are classified as trading and are carried at fair value. These trading investments are reflected on the statements of financial position as “Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value.” Realized and unrealized gains and losses for these investments are reported in “Asset management fees and other income.” Interest and dividend income for these investments is reported in “Net investment income.” Commercial mortgage and other loans that support these experience-rated products are carried at unpaid principal, net of unamortized discounts and an allowance for losses, and are reflected on the statements of financial position as “Commercial mortgage and other loans.”

Adjusted operating income excludes net investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities. This is consistent with the exclusion of realized investment gains and losses with respect to other investments supporting insurance liabilities managed on a consistent basis. In addition, to be consistent with the historical treatment of charges related to realized investment gains and losses on investments, adjusted operating income also excludes the change in contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes in the pool of investments (including commercial mortgage and other loans) supporting these experience-rated contracts, which are reflected in “Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances.” The result of this approach is that adjusted operating income for these products includes net fee revenue and interest spread the Company earns on these experience-rated contracts, and excludes changes in fair value of the pool of investments, both realized and unrealized, that are expected to accrue to the contractholders.

Divested businesses. The contribution to income/loss of divested businesses that have been or will be sold or exited, but that did not qualify for “discontinued operations” accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP, are excluded from adjusted operating income as the results of divested businesses are not relevant to understanding the Company’s ongoing operating results.

Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests. Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, on a pre-tax basis, are included in adjusted operating income as these results are a principal source of earnings. These earnings are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis on an after-tax basis as a separate line on the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are excluded from adjusted operating income. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of earnings from consolidated entities that relates to the equity interests of minority investors, and are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis as a separate line on the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The summary below reconciles adjusted operating income before income taxes for the Financial Services Businesses to income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Individual Annuities	$	432		$	154		$	449		$	269
Retirement		99			141			258			265
Asset Management		33			190			32			309

Total U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management Division		564			485			739			843
Individual Life		138			103			178			199
Group Insurance		105			80			198			170

Total U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance Division		243			183			376			369

International Insurance		465			453			890			866
International Investments		16			26			26			51

Total International Insurance and Investments Division		481			479			916			917

Corporate Operations		(165	)		(17	)		(268	)		(45	)
Real Estate and Relocation Services		3			(3	)		(60	)		(26	)

Total Corporate and Other		(162	)		(20	)		(328	)		(71	)

Adjusted Operating Income before income taxes for Financial Services Businesses		1,126			1,127			1,703			2,058

Reconciling items:
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments		(872	)		(527	)		(1,582	)		(1,192	)
Charges related to realized investment gains (losses), net		(5	)		41			39			28
Investment gains (losses) on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, net		686			(123	)		831			(385	)
Change in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes		(347	)		94			(392	)		294
Divested businesses		(24	)		10			(56	)		(57	)
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		14			(32	)		17			(68	)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures for Financial Services Businesses		578			590			560			678

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures for Closed Block Business		(586	)		38			(556	)		12

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	(8	)	$	628		$	4		$	690

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management Division and U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance Division results reflect deferred policy acquisition costs as if the individual annuity business and group insurance business were stand-alone operations. The elimination of intersegment costs capitalized in accordance with this policy is included in consolidating adjustments within Corporate and Other operations.

The summary below presents revenues for the Company’s reportable segments:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Financial Services Businesses:
Individual Annuities	$	115		$	622		$	2,007		$	1,195
Retirement		1,230			1,207			2,438			2,474
Asset Management		342			564			605			1,112

Total U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management Division		1,687			2,393			5,050			4,781

Individual Life		703			676			1,383			1,356
Group Insurance		1,303			1,218			2,636			2,475

Total U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance Division		2,006			1,894			4,019			3,831

International Insurance		2,533			2,329			5,070			4,654
International Investments		108			148			209			318

Total International Insurance and Investments Division		2,641			2,477			5,279			4,972

Corporate Operations		(48	)		27			(57	)		79
Real Estate and Relocation Services		52			63			51			109

Total Corporate and Other		4			90			(6	)		188

Total		6,338			6,854			14,342			13,772

Reconciling items:
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments		(872	)		(527	)		(1,582	)		(1,192	)
Charges related to realized investment gains (losses), net		(53	)		15			(61	)		16
Investment gains (losses) on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, net		686			(123	)		831			(385	)
Divested businesses		(16	)		28			(42	)		(17	)
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		(2	)		(40	)		12			(100	)

Total Financial Services Businesses		6,081			6,207			13,500			12,094

Closed Block Business		825			1,496			1,965			3,167

Total per Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements	$	6,906		$	7,703		$	15,465		$	15,261

The Asset Management segment revenues include intersegment revenues of $84 million and $87 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $169 million and $180 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily consisting of asset-based management and administration fees. Management has determined the intersegment revenues with reference to market rates. Intersegment revenues are eliminated in consolidation in Corporate and Other.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The summary below presents total assets for the Company’s reportable segments as of the periods indicated:


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Individual Annuities	$	68,209	$	65,516
Retirement		115,597		113,622
Asset Management		31,096		36,504

Total U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management Division		214,902		215,642

Individual Life		33,673		31,781
Group Insurance		32,249		31,657

Total U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance Division		65,922		63,438

International Insurance		78,694		76,362
International Investments		5,854		8,716

Total International Insurance and Investments Division		84,548		85,078

Corporate Operations		14,569		14,465
Real Estate and Relocation Services		677		1,003

Total Corporate and Other		15,246		15,468

Total Financial Services Businesses		380,618		379,626

Closed Block Business		64,098		65,385

Total per Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements	$	444,716	$	445,011

12. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Fair Value Measurement—Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that includes a hierarchy used to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1—Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These generally provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available. Active markets are defined as having the following for the measured asset/liability: i) many transactions, ii) current prices, iii) price quotes not varying substantially among market makers, iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and v) most information publicly available. The Company’s Level 1 assets and liabilities primarily include certain cash equivalents and short term investments, equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market. Prices are obtained from readily available sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

maturities (corporate public and private bonds, most government securities, certain asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, etc.), certain equity securities and commercial mortgage loans, short-term investments and certain cash equivalents (primarily commercial paper), and certain over-the-counter derivatives. Valuations are generally obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities or through the use of valuation methodologies using observable market inputs.

Prices from pricing services are sourced from multiple vendors, and a vendor hierarchy is maintained by asset type based on historical pricing experience and vendor expertise. The Company generally receives prices from multiple pricing services for each security, but ultimately uses the price from the pricing service highest in the vendor hierarchy based on the respective asset type. In order to validate reasonability, prices are reviewed by internal asset managers through comparison with directly observed recent market trades and internal estimates of current fair value, developed using market observable inputs and economic indicators.

The fair value of private fixed maturities are primarily determined using a discounted cash flow model. In certain cases these models primarily use observable inputs with a discount rate based upon the average of spread surveys collected from private market intermediaries who are active in both primary and secondary transactions, taking into account, among other factors, the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer and the reduced liquidity associated with private placements. Private fixed maturities also include debt investments in funds that, in addition to a stated coupon, pay a return based upon the results of the underlying portfolios. The fair values of these securities are determined by reference to the funds’ net asset value (NAV). Any restrictions on the ability to redeem interests in these funds at NAV are considered to have a de minimis effect on the fair value.

The fair values of common stock mutual fund shares that transact regularly (but do not trade in active markets because they are not publicly available) are based on transaction prices of identical fund shares and are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of preferred equity securities are based on prices obtained from independent pricing services and, in order to validate reasonability, are compared with directly observed recent market trades. Accordingly, these securities are generally classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of commercial loans held for investment and accounted for using the Fair Value Option, as discussed in Note 2, is determined based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the appropriate U.S. Treasury rate, adjusted for the current market spread for similar quality loans. The interest rate and market spread assumptions for similar quality loans are generally observable based upon market transactions. The fair value of loans held for sale and accounted for using the Fair Value Option discussed in Note 2 is determined utilizing pricing indicators from the whole loan market, which is considered the principal exit market for these loans. The Company has evaluated the valuation inputs used for these assets, including the terms of the loans, prevailing interest rates and credit risk, and deemed that the primary pricing inputs are observable.

The majority of the Company’s derivative positions is traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) derivative market and is classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. OTC derivatives classified within Level 2 are valued using models generally accepted in the financial services industry that use actively quoted or observable market input values from external market data providers, non-binding broker-dealer quotations, third-party pricing vendors and/or recent trading activity. The fair values of most OTC derivatives, including interest rate and cross currency swaps, currency forward contracts, commodity swaps, commodity forward contracts, single name credit default swaps, loan commitments held for sale and to-be-announced (or TBA) forward contracts on highly rated mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government sponsored entities are determined using discounted cash flow models. The fair values of European style option contracts are determined using Black-Scholes option pricing models. These models’ key assumptions include the contractual terms of the respective

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

contract, along with significant observable inputs, including interest rates, currency rates, credit spreads, yield curves, equity prices, index dividend yields, non-performance risk and volatility. OTC derivative contracts are executed under master netting agreements with counterparties with a Credit Support Annex, or CSA, which is a bilateral ratings-sensitive agreement that requires collateral postings at established credit threshold levels. These agreements protect the interests of the Company and its counterparties, should either party suffer a credit rating deterioration. The vast majority of the Company’s derivative agreements are with highly rated major international financial institutions. Consistent with the practice of major international financial institutions, the Company uses the credit spread embedded in the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) interest rate curve to reflect non-performance risk when determining the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities. The Company believes this credit spread is an appropriate estimate of the non-performance risk for derivative related assets and liabilities between highly rated institutions after consideration of the impacts of the collateral posting process. Most OTC derivative contracts have bid and ask prices that are actively quoted or can be readily obtained from external market data providers. The Company’s policy is to use mid-market pricing in determining its best estimate of fair value.

Other long-term investments carried at fair value include limited partnerships which are consolidated because the Company is either deemed to exercise control or considered the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. These entities are considered investment companies and follow specialized industry accounting whereby their assets are carried at fair value. The investments held by these entities include various feeder fund investments in underlying master funds (whose underlying holdings generally include public fixed maturities and equity securities), as well as wholly-owned real estate held within other investment funds.

The fair value of the feeder fund investments in master funds are generally determined by reference to the investments in the underlying master funds. The fair value of investments in funds holding publicly traded equity securities are generally based on quoted prices in active markets for identical investments and are therefore reflected as Level 1. The fair value of investments in funds holding public fixed maturities are generally based on validated quotes from pricing services as described above, and are reflected in Level 2.

Level 3—Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities primarily include: certain asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages as discussed below, certain private fixed maturities and equity securities, certain manually priced public equity securities and fixed maturities, certain highly structured over-the-counter derivative contracts, certain commercial mortgage loans, certain consolidated real estate funds for which the Company is the general partner, and embedded derivatives resulting from certain products with guaranteed benefits. In circumstances where vendor pricing is not available, internally developed valuations or non-binding broker quotes are used to determine fair value. Non-binding broker quotes are reviewed for reasonableness, based on the Company’s understanding of the market. These estimates may use significant unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Circumstances where observable market data are not available may include events such as market illiquidity and credit events related to the security. Under certain conditions, based on its observations of transactions in active markets, the Company may conclude the prices received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not reasonable or reflective of market activity. In those instances, the Company may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information or quotes received and apply internally developed values to the related assets or liabilities. In such cases, the valuations are generally classified as Level 3. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 over-rides on a net basis were not material.

As of June 30, 2009 the Company concluded that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was an inactive market as defined under FSP FAS 157-4. Therefore, in determining the fair

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

value of certain asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages the Company considered both third-party pricing information and an internally developed price based on a discounted cash flow model. As a result, the Company reported fair values for these sub-prime securities which were net $693 million higher than the estimated fair values received from independent third party pricing services or brokers. The adjusted fair value of these securities was $5,362 million.

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company observed that the volume and level of activity in the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages remained at historically low levels. This stood in particular contrast to the markets for other structured products with similar cash flow and credit profiles, which experienced an uptick in the level of activity. The Company also observed significant increases in implied relative liquidity risk premiums, yields, and weighting of “worst case” cash flows for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages in comparison with our own estimates for such securities. In contrast, other spread-based asset classes, such as corporate bonds, high yield and consumer asset-backed securities, such as those collateralized by credit cards or autos, which were previously more correlated with sub-prime securities, recovered in the second quarter of 2009. Based on this information, the Company concluded as of June 30, 2009 that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was inactive and also determined the pricing quotes it received were based on little, if any, market activity, calling into question their representation of observable fair value. Furthermore, the Company’s direct and indirect observations of the limited transactions that were occurring were dominated by forced liquidations or distressed sales and not executed in an orderly manner.

Based on this conclusion, in determining the fair value of certain asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, the Company considered both third-party pricing information, and an internally developed price, based on a discounted cash flow model. The discount rate used in the model was based on observed spreads for other similarly structured credit markets which were active and dominated by observable orderly transactions. The Company also applied additional risk premiums to the discount rate to reflect the relative illiquidity and asset specific cash flow uncertainty associated with asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. This combined security specific additional spread reflects our judgment of what an investor would demand for taking on such risks in an orderly transaction under current market conditions at the end of the second quarter of 2009, and is significantly higher than would be indicative of historical spread differences between structured credit asset classes when all asset classes had active markets dominated with orderly transactions. The Company believes these estimated spreads are reflective of current market conditions in the sub-prime mortgage market and these spread estimates are further supported by their relationship to our recent observations of some limited transactions in shorter-duration sub-prime securities. Using this discount rate, valuations were developed based on the expected future cash flows of the assets. In determining how much weight to place on the third-party pricing information versus our discounted cash flow valuation, the Company considered the level of inactivity and impact of disorderly transactions. The Company weighted third-party pricing information as little as 30% where it had little observable market information, and as much as 90% where more observable information was available.

For certain private fixed maturities, the discounted cash flow model may also incorporate significant unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Certain public fixed maturities and private fixed maturities priced internally are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Significant unobservable inputs used include: issue specific credit adjustments, material non-public financial information, management judgment, estimation of future earnings and cashflows, default rate assumptions, liquidity assumptions and non-binding quotes from market makers. These inputs are usually considered unobservable, as not all market participants will have access to this data.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Estimated fair values for most privately traded equity securities are determined using valuation and discounted cash flow models that require a substantial level of judgment. In determining the fair value of certain privately traded equity securities the discounted cash flow model may also use unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset.

The fair values of the GMAB, GMWB and GMIWB liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefit payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature. Since there is no observable active market for the transfer of these obligations, the valuations are calculated using internally developed models with option pricing techniques. The models are based on a risk neutral valuation framework and incorporate premiums for risks inherent in valuation techniques, inputs, and the general uncertainty around the timing and amount of future cash flows. The determination of these risk premiums requires the use of management judgment. Under SFAS No. 157, the Company is also required to incorporate the Company’s own risk of non-performance in the valuation of the embedded derivatives associated with the Company’s optional living benefit features. Since insurance liabilities are senior to debt, the Company believes that reflecting the claims-paying ratings of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries in the valuation of the liability appropriately takes into consideration the Company’s own risk of non-performance. Historically, the expected cash flows were discounted using forward LIBOR interest rates, which were commonly viewed as being consistent with AA quality claims-paying ratings. However, in light of first quarter of 2009 developments, including rating agency downgrades to the claims-paying ratings of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries, the Company determined that forward LIBOR interest rates were no longer indicative of the Company’s claims-paying ability. As a result, beginning in the first quarter of 2009, to reflect the market’s perception of its non-performance risk, the Company incorporated an additional spread over LIBOR into the discount rate used in the valuations of the embedded derivatives associated with our optional living benefit features, thereby increasing the discount rate and reducing the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities. The additional spread over LIBOR is determined taking into consideration publicly available information relating to the claims-paying ability of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries, as indicated by the credit spreads associated with funding agreements issued by these subsidiaries. The Company adjusts these credit spreads to remove any liquidity risk premium. The additional spread over LIBOR incorporated into the discount rate as of June 30, 2009 generally ranged from 100 to 200 basis points for the portion of the interest rate curve most relevant to these liabilities.

Other significant inputs to the valuation models for the embedded derivatives associated with the optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity products include capital market assumptions, such as interest rate and implied volatility assumptions, as well as various policyholder behavior assumptions that are actuarially determined, including lapse rates, benefit utilization rates, mortality rates and withdrawal rates. These assumptions are reviewed at least annually, and updated based upon historical experience and give consideration to any observable market data, including market transactions such as acquisitions and reinsurance transactions. In the first quarter of 2009 the Company updated the volatility assumptions for the Individual Annuities segment to reflect both the implied volatility of over-the-counter equity options and an index based on historical volatilities.

Level 3 includes OTC derivatives where the bid-ask spreads are generally wider than derivatives classified within Level 2 thus requiring more judgment in estimating the mid-market price of such derivatives.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Derivatives that are valued based upon models with unobservable market input values or input values from less actively traded or less-developed markets are classified within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Derivatives classified as Level 3 include first-to-default credit basket swaps, look-back equity options and other structured options. The fair values of first-to-default credit basket swaps are derived from relevant observable inputs such as: individual credit default spreads, interest rates, recovery rates and unobservable model-specific input values such as correlation between different credits within the same basket. Look-back equity options and other structured options and derivatives are valued using simulation models such as the Monte Carlo technique. The input values for look-back equity options are derived from observable market indices such as interest rates, dividend yields, equity indices as well as unobservable model-specific input values such as certain volatility parameters. Level 3 methodologies are validated through periodic comparison of the Company’s fair values to broker-dealer’s values.

Long-term debt carried at fair value includes funding received from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on a non-recourse basis to finance the purchase of eligible asset-backed securities, under TALF. The Company values these liabilities using various inputs including the value of the collateral (eligible asset-backed securities), a comparison of the liabilities’ spread over LIBOR to the spreads in current TALF offerings and various other market observable and non-observable inputs which incorporate significant management judgment. As a result, the pricing of the non-recourse liabilities have been classified within Level 3 in the Company’s fair value hierarchy. The pricing of the collateral assets (“other trading account assets” is generally based on third party pricing information as discussed above, and included in Level 2 in the Company’s fair value hierarchy. See Note 9 for additional information regarding the Company’s participation in TALF.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of the dates indicated.


	As of June 30, 2009
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting(2)			Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	—	$	6,563	$	—	$	—		$	6,563
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		748		—		—			748
Foreign government bonds		—		35,704		43		—			35,747
Corporate securities		—		81,570		1,279		—			82,849
Asset-backed securities		—		4,494		6,014		—			10,508
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		10,192		59		—			10,251
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		12,050		197		—			12,247

Sub-total		—		151,321		7,592		—			158,913
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies		—		112		—		—			112
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		2		—		—			2
Foreign government bonds		—		479		—		—			479
Corporate securities		—		8,415		197		—			8,612
Asset-backed securities		—		423		269		—			692
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		2,127		5		—			2,132
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		1,357		24		—			1,381
Equity securities		615		186		2		—			803
All other activity		336		217		—		—			553

Sub-total		951		13,318		497		—			14,766
Other trading account assets:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies		—		59		—		—			59
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		—		—		—			—
Foreign government bonds		—		33		—		—			33
Corporate securities		10		175		59		—			244
Asset-backed securities		—		1,587		35		—			1,622
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		111		9		—			120
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		112		6		—			118
Equity securities		72		10		21		—			103
All other activity		12		4,968		906		(4,470	)		1,416

Sub-total		94		7,055		1,036		(4,470	)		3,715
Equity securities, available for sale		3,460		2,106		351		—			5,917
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—		508		—		—			508
Other long-term investments		50		133		495		—			678
Short term investments		3,251		2,819		—		—			6,070
Cash and cash equivalents		2,039		8,432		—		—			10,471
Other assets		2,018		453		26		—			2,497

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		11,863		186,145		9,997		(4,470	)		203,535
Separate account assets(1)		54,592		82,470		14,204		—			151,266

Total assets	$	66,455	$	268,615	$	24,201	$	(4,470	)	$	354,801

Future policy benefits		—		—		796		—			796
Long-term debt		—		—		1,167		—			1,167
Other liabilities		15		4,607		79		(3,878	)		823

Total liabilities	$	15	$	4,607	$	2,042	$	(3,878	)	$	2,786

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(1)

Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account assets classified as Level 3 consist primarily of real estate and real estate investment funds. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(2)	“Netting” amounts represent cash collateral and the impact of offsetting asset and liability positions held with the same counterparty as permitted by FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts and FSP FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39.


	As of December 31, 2008
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting(2)			Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale	$	—	$	155,787	$	2,269	$	—		$	158,056
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities		748		12,982		145		—			13,875
Other trading account assets		143		9,882		1,396		(7,085	)		4,336
Equity securities, available for sale		3,801		1,939		325		—			6,065
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—		517		56		—			573
Other long-term investments		246		265		1,015		—			1,526
Short term investments		2,601		1,874		—		—			4,475
Cash and cash equivalents		2,512		8,834		—		—			11,346
Other assets		1,255		2,500		26		—			3,781

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		11,306		194,580		5,232		(7,085	)		204,033
Separate account assets(1)		56,362		70,953		19,780		—			147,095

Total assets	$	67,668	$	265,533	$	25,012	$	(7,085	)	$	351,128

Future policy benefits		—		—		3,229		—			3,229
Long-term debt		—		—		324		—			324
Other liabilities		57		6,692		139		(5,948	)		940

Total liabilities	$	57	$	6,692	$	3,692	$	(5,948	)	$	4,493

(1)

(2)	“Netting” amounts represent cash collateral and the impact of offsetting asset and liability positions held with the same counterparty as permitted by FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts and FSP FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following tables provide a summary of the changes in fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, as well as the portion of gains or losses included in income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 attributable to unrealized gains or losses related to those assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2009.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Foreign Government Bonds		Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Corporate Securities			Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Asset- Backed Securities			Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities			Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	29	$	1,041		$	1,261		$	62		$	211
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		—		(98	)		(952	)		(3	)		—
Other-than temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income		—		56			660			1			—
Other realized investment gains (losses), net		—		3			—			—			—

Total realized investment gains (losses), net		—		(39	)		(292	)		(2	)		—
Asset management fees and other income		—		—			—			—			—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		4		87			1,040			(2	)		—
Net investment income		—		4			(6	)		—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		—		67			(558	)		—			(14	)
Foreign currency translation		—		—			2			1			—
Other(1)		—		(24	)		—			—			—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		10		143			4,567			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	43	$	1,279		$	6,014		$	59		$	197

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		—		(49	)		(820	)		(3	)		—
Other-than temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income		—		14			527			1			—
Other realized investment gains (losses), net		—		—			—			—			—

Total realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—	$	(35	)	$	(293	)	$	(2	)	$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	5	$	84		$	1,045		$	(2	)	$	1

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Corporate Securities			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Asset- Backed Securities			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities		Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Equity Securities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	136		$	80		$	5	$	28		$	2
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—			—					—			—
Asset management fees and other income		15			31			—		—			—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—			—		—			—
Net investment income		1			—			—		—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		(24	)		(28	)		—		(2	)		—
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—		—			—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		69			186			—		(2	)		—

Fair value, end of period	$	197		$	269		$	5	$	24		$	2

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	11		$	31		$	—	$	(1	)	$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Other Trading Account Assets- Corporate Securities			Other Trading Account Assets - Asset- Backed Securities			Other Trading Account Assets - Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities			Other Trading Account Assets - Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities			Other Trading Account Assets -Equity Securities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	39		$	811		$	2		$	3		$	16
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—			—			—			—			—
Asset management fees and other income		(1	)		(3	)		(2	)		(1	)		1
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—			—			—			—
Net investment income		—			1			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		—			(2	)		—			—			—
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—			1
Other(1)		21			—			—			—			3
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		—			(772	)		9			4			—

Fair value, end of period	$	59		$	35		$	9		$	6		$	21

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	(1	)	$	(1	)	$	(3	)	$	(1	)	$	1
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Other Trading Account Assets -All Other Activity			Equity Securities, Available for Sale			Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans			Other Long-term Investments			Other Assets
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	1,109		$	327		$	16		$	389		$	26
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		(223	)		1			(2	)		—			—
Asset management fees and other income		(18	)		—			—			3			—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			23			—			—			—
Net investment income		—			—			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		33			(10	)		(14	)		107			—
Foreign currency translation		—			5			—			—			—
Other(1)		5			(1	)		—			(4	)		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		—			6			—			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	906		$	351		$	—		$	495		$	26

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	(238	)	$	(1	)	$	—		$	—		$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	(2	)	$	—		$	—		$	2		$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	—		$	35		$	—		$	—		$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Separate Account Assets(4)			Future Policy Benefits			Long-Term Debt			Other Liabilities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	16,145		$	(1,816	)	$	(736	)	$	(194	)
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—			1,050			—			79
Asset management fees and other income		—			—			(40	)		—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		(2,054	)		—			—			—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—
Net investment income		—			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		225			(30	)		(391	)		36
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—
Other(1)		—			—			—			—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		(112	)		—			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	14,204		$	(796	)	$	(1,167	)	$	(79	)

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets and liabilities that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—		$	976		$	—		$	79
Asset management fees and other income	$	—		$	—		$	(40	)	$	—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances	$	(2,272	)	$	—		$	—		$	—

(1)	Other represents the impact of the deconsolidation of certain real estate funds and reclasses of certain assets between reporting categories.

(2)	Transfers into or out of Level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs.

(3)	Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts.

(4)

Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Transfers—Transfers into level 3 for Fixed Maturities Available for Sale—Asset-Backed securities and Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities – Asset-Backed securities include $4,583 million and $188 million, respectively for the three months ended June 30, 2009, resulting from the Company’s conclusion that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was an inactive market as defined under FSP FAS 157-4, as discussed in detail above. The transfers out of level 3 for Other Trading Account Assets—Asset-Backed securities were primarily the result of the use of third party pricing for the securities purchased under TALF. In the first quarter of 2009, these assets were valued internally using a model. Transfers into level 3 for Fixed Maturities Available for Sale – Corporate securities for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were primarily due to changes in the contractual terms of a private security that resulted in the use of unobservable inputs within the valuation methodologies when previously, observable inputs were available.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Foreign Government Bonds		Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Corporate Securities			Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Asset- Backed Securities			Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities			Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale – Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	30	$	932		$	1,013		$	66		$	228
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		—		(138	)		(1,020	)		(3	)		—
Other-than temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income		—		53			692			1			—
Other realized investment gains (losses), net		—		1			—			—			—

Total realized investment gains (losses), net		—		(84	)		(328	)		(2	)		—
Asset management fees and other income		—		—			—			—			—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		3		17			851			(5	)		—
Net investment income		—		9			(4	)		—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		—		63			(611	)		—			(31	)
Foreign currency translation		—		—			(2	)		—			—
Other(1)		—		(24	)		—			—			—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		10		366			5,095			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	43	$	1,279		$	6,014		$	59		$	197

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities	$	—	$	(114	)	$	(1,108	)	$	(3	)	$	—
Other-than temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income	$	—	$	36		$	779		$	1		$	—
Other realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

Total realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—	$	(78	)	$	(329	)	$	(2	)	$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	3	$	12		$	813		$	(5	)	$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Corporate Securities			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Asset- Backed Securities			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities- Equity Securities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	75		$	35		$	6		$	28		$	1
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—			—			—			—			—
Asset management fees and other income		7			16			(1	)		—			—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		—			—			—			—			—
Net investment income		2			—			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		(28	)		(33	)		—			(2	)		1
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—			—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		141			251			—			(2	)		—

Fair value, end of period	$	197		$	269		$	5		$	24		$	2

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	3		$	16		$	(1	)	$	—		$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Other Trading Account Assets- Corporate Securities		Other Trading Account Assets - Asset- Backed Securities			Other Trading Account Assets - Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities			Other Trading Account Assets - Residential Mortgage- Backed Securities			Other Trading Account Assets -Equity Securities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	38	$	30		$	2		$	3		$	19
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—		—			—			—			—
Asset management fees and other income		—		(41	)		(2	)		(2	)		(1	)
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		—		—			—			—			—
Net investment income		—		1			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		—		819			—			1			—
Foreign currency translation		—		—			—			—			—
Other(1)		21		—			—			—			3
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		—		(774	)		9			4			—

Fair value, end of period	$	59	$	35		$	9		$	6		$	21

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	—	$	(41	)	$	(2	)	$	(2	)	$	(1	)
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Other Trading Account Assets -All Other Activity			Equity Securities, Available for Sale			Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans			Other Long-term Investments			Other Assets
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	1,304		$	325		$	56		$	1,015		$	26
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		(129	)		(3	)		(5	)		—			—
Asset management fees and other income		(3	)		—			—			(26	)		—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			20			—			—			—
Net investment income		—			—			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		(271	)		7			(51	)		162			—
Foreign currency translation		—			(2	)		—			—			—
Other(1)		5			(1	)		—			(656	)		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		—			5			—			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	906		$	351		$	—		$	495		$	26

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	(131	)	$	(5	)	$	—		$	—		$	—
Asset management fees and other income	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(24	)	$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	—		$	19		$	—		$	—		$	—


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Separate Account Assets(4)			Future Policy Benefits			Long-Term Debt			Other Liabilities
Fair value, beginning of period	$	19,780		$	(3,229	)	$	(324	)	$	(139	)
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—			2,485			—			24
Asset management fees and other income		—			—			—			—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		(5,572	)		—			—			—
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—			—			—
Net investment income		—			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		267			(52	)		(1,167	)		36
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—
Other(1)		—			—			324			—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(2)		(271	)		—			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	14,204		$	(796	)	$	(1,167	)	$	(79	)

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets and liabilities that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(3):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—		$	2,427		$	—		$	24
Asset management fees and other income	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances	$	(5,847	)	$	—		$	—		$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(1)	Other represents the impact of the deconsolidation of certain real estate funds and reclasses of certain assets between reporting categories.

(2)	Transfers into or out of Level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs.

(3)	Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts.

(4)

Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Transfers—Transfers into level 3 for Fixed Maturities Available for Sale—Asset-Backed securities and Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities—Asset-Backed securities include $4,583 million and $188 million, respectively for the six months ended June 30, 2009, resulting from the Company’s conclusion that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was an inactive market as defined under FSP FAS 157-4, as discussed in detail above. In addition to these sub-prime securities, transfers into level 3 for Fixed Maturities Available for Sale—Asset-Backed securities as well as Fixed Maturities Available for Sale—Corporate securities included transfers resulting from the use of unobservable inputs within valuation methodologies and the use of broker quotes (that could not be validated) when previously, information from third party pricing services (that could be validated) or models with observable inputs were utilized. Partially offsetting these transfers into Level 3 were transfers out of Level 3 due to the use of observable inputs in valuation methodologies as well as the utilization of pricing service information for certain assets that the Company was able to validate. In addition to the sub-prime securities mentioned above, transfers into Level 3 for Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities—Asset-Backed securities as well as Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities—Corporate securities include transfers in due to the use of unobservable inputs within the valuation methodologies and broker quotes (that could not be validated), when previously information from third party pricing services (that could be validated) was utilized. The transfers out of level 3 for Other Trading Account Assets—Asset-Backed securities were primarily the result of the use of third party pricing for the securities purchased under TALF. In the first quarter of 2009, these assets were valued internally using a model.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following tables provide a summary of the changes in fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, as well as the portion of gains or losses included in income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 attributable to unrealized gains or losses related to those assets and liabilities still held at June 30, 2008.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities			Other Trading Account Assets			Equity Securities, Available for Sale			Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	3,099		$	193		$	626		$	187		$	—
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		(85	)		—			(67	)		(1	)		(5	)
Asset management fees and other income		—			—			1			—			—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		(7	)		—			—			(9	)		—
Net investment income		1			(1	)		—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		(306	)		(7	)		81			22			(6	)
Foreign currency translation		—			—			(1	)		(1	)		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(1)		(843	)		(28	)		—			(60	)		81

Fair value, end of period	$	1,859		$	157		$	640		$	138		$	70

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(2):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	(92	)	$	—		$	(68	)	$	(2	)	$	(4	)
Asset management fees and other income	$	—		$	(2	)	$	2		$	—		$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(7	)	$	—		$	—		$	(9	)	$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Other Long-term Investments		Separate Account Assets(3)			Future Policy Benefits			Long- Term Debt			Other Liabilities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	877	$	22,108		$	(452	)	$	(184	)	$	(118	)
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—		—			147			—			30
Asset management fees and other income		8		—			—			—			—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		—		(240	)		—			—			—
Included in other comprehensive income		—		—			—			—			—
Net investment income		1		—			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		42		956			(22	)		(27	)		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(1)		—		1,735			—			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	928	$	24,559		$	(327	)	$	(211	)	$	(88	)

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets and liabilities that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(2):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—	$	—		$	134		$	—		$	31
Asset management fees and other income	$	9	$	—		$	—		$	(1	)	$	—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances	$	—	$	(112	)	$	—		$	—		$	—

(1)	Transfers into or out of level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs.

(2)	Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts.

(3)

Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Transfers—Transfers out of Level 3 for Fixed Maturities Available for Sale and Equity Securities Available for Sale totaled $843 million and $60 million, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2008. This activity was a result of the use of pricing service information that the Company was able to validate in the second quarter of 2008 but which was not available in the first quarter of 2008. The amount of Separate Account Assets transferred into Level 3 in the second quarter total $1,735 million. This resulted from further review of valuation methodologies for certain assets that had been previously classified as Level 2. In addition, for certain assets, third party prices with backtesting were not available in the current quarter and the use of broker quotes required a transfer to Level 3. Transfers of Commercial Loans into Level 3 totaled $81 million and resulted from a reduction in the availability of market available prices during the second quarter due to market illiquidity.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Fixed Maturities, Available For Sale			Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities			Other Trading Account Assets			Equity Securities, Available for Sale			Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	2,890		$	291		$	497		$	190		$	—
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		(229	)		—			32			(2	)		(5	)
Asset management fees and other income		—			1			(4	)		—			—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		(129	)		—			—			(21	)		—
Net investment income		4			(1	)		—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		(364	)		(16	)		115			20			(6	)
Foreign currency translation		—			—			—			—			—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(1)		(313	)		(118	)		—			(49	)		81

Fair value, end of period	$	1,859		$	157		$	640		$	138		$	70

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(2):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	(232	)	$	—		$	32		$	(3	)	$	(4	)
Asset management fees and other income	$	—		$	(11	)	$	(4	)	$	—		$	—
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(125	)	$	—		$	—		$	(21	)	$	—

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Other Long-term Investments		Separate Account Assets(3)			Future Policy Benefits			Long- Term Debt			Other Liabilities
	(in millions)
Fair value, beginning of period	$	824	$	21,815		$	(168	)	$	(152	)	$	(77	)
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—		—			(118	)		—			(11	)
Asset management fees and other income		90		—			—			1			—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		—		(71	)		—			—			—
Included in other comprehensive income		—		—			—			—			—
Net investment income		3		—			—			—			—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements		11		1,118			(41	)		(60	)		—
Transfers into (out of) Level 3(1)		—		1,697			—			—			—

Fair value, end of period	$	928	$	24,559		$	(327	)	$	(211	)	$	(88	)

Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets and liabilities that were still held by the Company at the end of the period(2):
Included in earnings:
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	—	$	—		$	(133	)	$	—		$	(11	)
Asset management fees and other income	$	59	$	—		$	—		$	1		$	—
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances	$	—	$	(234	)	$	—		$	—		$	—

(1)	Transfers into or out of level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs.

(2)	Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts.

(3)

Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements—Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The Company has written down certain commercial loans held at June 30, 2009 that are carried at the lower of cost or market, to their fair value of $67 million. This resulted in charges of $12 million and $22 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The fair value measurements were classified as Level 3 in the valuation hierarchy. The inputs utilized for these valuations are pricing indicators from the whole loan market, which the Company considers its principal market for these loans. Losses of $21 million and $44 million were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, for similar assets held at June 30, 2008.

In addition, impairments of $18 million and $41 million were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, on certain cost method investments. The carrying value as of June 30, 2009 of these investments was $129 million. Impairments on similar investments of $8 million and $9 million were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Impairments of $1 million were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 on certain equity method investments. The carrying value as of

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

June 30, 2009 of these investments was $33 million. Impairments on similar investments of $3 million and $4 million were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The fair value adjustments were based on inputs classified as Level 3 in the valuation hierarchy. The inputs utilized were primarily discounted estimated future cash flows and valuations provided by the general partners taken into consideration with deal and management fee expenses.

Fair Value Option—SFAS No. 159 provides a fair value option election that allows the Company to irrevocably elect fair value as the measurement attribute for certain financial assets and liabilities. The following table presents information regarding changes in fair values recorded in earnings, including gains or losses on sales, for commercial mortgage loans and long-term debt where the fair value option has been elected.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Assets:
Commercial Mortgage Loans:
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk	$	(16	)	$	(2	)	$	(35	)	$	(21	)
Other changes in fair value		3			(15	)		1			(1	)
Liabilities:
Long-term debt:
Changes in fair value	$	(40	)	$	—		$	—		$	—

Changes in fair value are reflected in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” for commercial mortgage loans and “Asset management fees and other income” for long-term debt. Changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk are estimated based on changes in credit spreads and quality ratings for the period reported.

None of the commercial mortgage loans where the fair value option has been selected are more than 90 days past due or in non-accrual status. Interest income on commercial mortgage loans is included in net investment income. Interest income recorded on these loans was $11 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and $20 million and $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest income on these loans is recorded based on the effective interest rates as determined at the closing of the loan. The fair values and aggregate contractual principal amounts of commercial mortgage loans, for which the fair value option has been elected, were $508 million and $547 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2009.

The fair values and aggregate contractual principal amounts of long-term debt, for which the fair value option has been elected, were $1,167 million as of June 30, 2009. Interest expense recorded on this debt is included in general and administrative expenses. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded $4 million of interest expense.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—Under SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” the Company is required to disclose the fair value of certain financial instruments. For the following financial instruments the carrying amount equals or approximates fair value: fixed maturities classified as available for sale, trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, other trading account assets, equity securities, securities purchased under agreements to resell, short-term investments, cash and cash equivalents, accrued investment income, separate account assets, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and cash collateral for loaned securities, as well as certain items recorded within other assets and other liabilities such as broker-dealer related receivables and payables. See Note 14 for a discussion of derivative instruments.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following table discloses the Company’s financial instruments where the carrying amounts and fair values may differ:


	June 30, 2009
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Assets:
Fixed maturities, held to maturity	$	4,935	$	4,938
Commercial mortgage and other loans		32,694		30,792
Policy loans		9,856		11,615
Wachovia Securities “lookback” option		580		2,536
Liabilities:
Policyholder account balances—Investment contracts		72,109		71,658
Short-term and long-term debt		24,624		22,090
Debt of consolidated VIEs		413		193
Bank customer liabilities		1,365		1,378
Separate account liabilities—Investment contracts		75,401		75,401

The fair values presented above for those financial instruments where the carrying amounts and fair values may differ have been determined by using available market information and by applying market valuation methodologies, as described in more detail below.

Fixed Maturities, held to maturity

The fair values of public fixed maturity securities are generally based on prices from third party pricing services, which are reviewed to validate reasonability. However, for certain public fixed maturity securities and investments in private placement fixed maturity securities, this information is either not available or not reliable. For these public fixed maturity securities the fair value is based on non-binding broker quotes, if available, or, to a lesser extent, is determined using internally developed values. For private fixed maturities fair value is determined using a discounted cash flow model, which utilizes a discount rate based upon the average of spread surveys collected from private market intermediaries who are active in both primary and secondary transactions and takes into account, among other factors, the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer and the reduced liquidity associated with private placements. In determining the fair value of certain fixed maturity securities, the discounted cash flow model may also use unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the security.

Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans

The fair value of commercial mortgage and other loans, other than those held by the Company’s commercial mortgage operations, is primarily based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the appropriate U.S. Treasury rate or Japanese Government Bond rate for yen based loans, adjusted for the current market spread for similar quality loans.

The fair value of commercial mortgage and other loans held by the Company’s commercial mortgage operations is based upon various factors, including the terms of the loans, the principal exit markets for the loans, prevailing interest rates, and credit risk.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Policy Loans

The fair value of U.S. insurance policy loans is calculated using a discounted cash flow model based upon current U.S. Treasury rates and historical loan repayment patterns, while Japanese insurance policy loans use the risk-free proxy based on the Yen LIBOR. For group corporate- and trust-owned life insurance contracts and group universal life contracts, the fair value of the policy loans is the amount due as of the reporting date.

Wachovia Securities “lookback” option

As described in Note 13, the Company elected to exercise its rights under the “lookback” option as it relates to its interest in the Wachovia Securities joint venture. The fair value of the “lookback” option is determined internally by using an approach that employs both Black-Scholes and binominal option pricing models, which includes inputs such as equity market volatilities, risk-free rates, dividend yields and counterparty credit risk, as well as an illiquidity discount. The carrying value of the “lookback” option is reflected within “Other assets.”

Investment Contracts—Policyholders’ Account Balances & Separate Account Liabilities

Only the portion of policyholders’ account balances and separate account liabilities related to products that are investment contracts (those without significant mortality or morbidity risk) are reflected in the table above. For fixed deferred annuities, single premium endowments, payout annuities and other similar contracts without life contingencies, fair values are derived using discounted projected cash flows based on interest rates that are representative of the Company’s claims paying ratings, and hence reflects the Company’s own nonperformance risk. For guaranteed investment contracts, funding agreements, structured settlements without life contingencies and other similar products, fair values are derived using discounted projected cash flows based on interest rates being offered for similar contracts with maturities consistent with those of the contracts being valued. For those balances that can be withdrawn by the customer at any time without prior notice or penalty, the fair value is the amount estimated to be payable to the customer as of the reporting date, which is generally the carrying value. For defined contribution and defined benefit contracts and certain other products the fair value is the market value of the assets supporting the liabilities.

Debt

The fair value of short-term and long-term debt, as well as debt of consolidated VIEs, is generally determined by either prices obtained from independent pricing services, which are validated by the Company, or discounted cash flow models. These fair values consider the Company’s own nonperformance risk. Discounted cash flow models predominately use market observable inputs such as the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt and financial instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities. For commercial paper issuances and other debt with a maturity of less than 90 days, the carrying value approximates fair value. Debt of consolidated VIEs is reflected within “Other liabilities.”

A portion of the senior secured notes issued by Prudential Holdings, LLC (the “IHC debt”) is insured by a third-party financial guarantee insurance policy. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 08-5, the effect of the third-party credit enhancement is not included in the fair value measurement of the IHC debt and the methodologies used to determine fair value consider the Company’s own nonperformance risk.

Bank Customer Liabilities

The carrying amount for certain deposits (interest and non-interest demand, savings and money market accounts) approximates or equals their fair values. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates being offered on certificates at the reporting dates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities. Bank customer liabilities are reflected with “Other liabilities.”

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

13. INVESTMENT IN WACHOVIA SECURITIES

On July 1, 2003, the Company combined its retail securities brokerage and clearing operations with those of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”) and formed Wachovia Securities, a joint venture currently headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. The transaction included the contribution of certain assets and liabilities of the Company’s securities brokerage operations; however, the Company retained certain assets and liabilities related to the contributed operations, including liabilities for certain litigation and regulatory matters. The Company and Wachovia have each agreed to indemnify the other for certain losses, including losses resulting from litigation and regulatory matters relating to certain events arising from the operations of their respective contributed businesses prior to June 30, 2004. Reflecting the Company’s intention to put its interest in the Wachovia Securities joint venture, as discussed below, the results of the joint venture are included in Corporate and Other operations as a divested business.

On October 1, 2007, Wachovia completed the acquisition of A.G. Edwards, Inc. (“A.G. Edwards”) and on January 1, 2008 contributed the retail securities brokerage business of A.G. Edwards to the joint venture. Wachovia’s contribution of this business entitled the Company to elect a “lookback” option (which the Company elected) permitting the Company to delay for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010, the decision on whether or not to make payments to avoid or limit dilution of its 38% ownership interest in the joint venture or, alternatively, to “put” its joint venture interests to Wachovia based on the appraised value of the joint venture, excluding the A.G. Edwards business, as of January 1, 2008, the date of the combination of the A.G. Edwards business with Wachovia Securities. During this “lookback” period, the Company’s share in the earnings of the joint venture and one-time costs associated with the combination of the A.G. Edwards business with Wachovia Securities is based on the Company’s diluted ownership level, which has not yet been determined. Based upon the existing agreements and the Company’s estimates of the values of the A.G. Edwards business and the joint venture excluding the A.G. Edwards business, the Company adjusted the carrying value of its ownership interest in the joint venture effective as of January 1, 2008 to reflect the addition of the A.G. Edwards business and the dilution of the Company’s 38% ownership interest and to record the value of the above described rights under the “lookback” option. The Company accordingly recognized a corresponding increase to “Additional paid-in capital” of $1.041 billion, net of tax, which represented the excess of the estimated value of the Company’s share of the A.G. Edwards business received (of approximately $1.444 billion) and the estimated value of the “lookback” option acquired (of approximately $580 million) over the carrying value of the portion of the Company’s ownership interest in Wachovia Securities that was diluted (of approximately $422 million), net of taxes (of approximately $561 million). The Company’s recorded share of pre-tax losses from the joint venture of $29 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects its estimated diluted ownership level based upon the existing agreements and its estimates of the values of the A.G. Edwards business and the joint venture excluding the A.G. Edwards business. Establishment of definitive agreed or appraised values for the A.G. Edwards business and the joint venture excluding the A.G. Edwards business will result in an adjustment to the credit to equity and a true-up to the Company’s earnings from the joint venture for any difference between the diluted ownership percentage used to record earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the finally determined diluted ownership percentage. The Company does not anticipate any such adjustment to have a material effect on its reported results of operations.

On October 3, 2008, Wachovia and Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) announced that they had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, pursuant to which Wachovia would be merged into Wells Fargo, which would succeed to Wachovia’s rights and obligations under the joint venture arrangements. As reported by Wells Fargo, this merger was completed on December 31, 2008. Wachovia Securities is now using the Wells Fargo Advisors name.

On December 4, 2008, the Company announced its intention to exercise its right under the “lookback” option to put its joint venture interests to Wells Fargo. On June 17, 2009, the Company provided notice to Wells

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Fargo of its exercise of its “lookback” option put rights. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, the Company expects that the closing of the put transaction will occur on or about January 1, 2010. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, Wells Fargo may elect to pay the proceeds from our exercise of the “lookback” put either in cash, Wells Fargo common stock or a combination of the foregoing. The Company has received notice from Wells Fargo that it intends to pay the proceeds in an unspecified combination of cash and Wells Fargo common stock. Under the terms of the agreements relating to the joint venture, the number of shares of Wells Fargo common stock to be received by the Company will be determined by dividing the portion of the proceeds to be paid in Wells Fargo common stock by the average of the closing prices of the Wells Fargo common stock during the 10 trading day period immediately prior to the closing. The joint venture agreements provide that the Company and Wells Fargo will enter into a registration rights agreement for the registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of the Wells Fargo shares to be received at the closing.

14. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Types of Derivative Instruments and Derivative Strategies used in a non-dealer or broker capacity

Interest rate swaps are used by the Company to manage interest rate exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (including duration mismatches) and to hedge against changes in the value of assets it anticipates acquiring and other anticipated transactions and commitments. Swaps may be attributed to specific assets or liabilities or may be used on a portfolio basis. Under interest rate swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional principal amount. Generally, no cash is exchanged at the outset of the contract and no principal payments are made by either party. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty at each due date.

Exchange-traded futures and options are used by the Company to reduce risks from changes in interest rates, to alter mismatches between the duration of assets in a portfolio and the duration of liabilities supported by those assets, and to hedge against changes in the value of securities it owns or anticipates acquiring or selling. In exchange-traded futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the values of which are determined by the values of underlying referenced investments, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures and options with regulated futures commission’s merchants who are members of a trading exchange.

Currency derivatives, including exchange-traded currency futures and options, currency forwards and currency swaps, are used by the Company to reduce risks from changes in currency exchange rates with respect to investments denominated in foreign currencies that the Company either holds or intends to acquire or sell. The Company also uses currency forwards to hedge the currency risk associated with net investments in foreign operations and anticipated earnings of its foreign operations.

Under currency forwards, the Company agrees with other parties to deliver a specified amount of an identified currency at a specified future date. Typically, the price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at the specified future date. As noted above, the Company uses currency forwards to mitigate the risk that unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates will reduce U.S. dollar equivalent earnings generated by certain of its non-U.S. businesses, primarily its international insurance and investments operations. The Company executes forward sales of the hedged currency in exchange for U.S. dollars at a specified exchange rate. The maturities of these forwards correspond with the future periods in which the non-U.S. earnings are expected to be generated. These earnings hedges do not qualify for hedge accounting.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Under currency swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and another at an exchange rate and calculated by reference to an agreed principal amount. Generally, the principal amount of each currency is exchanged at the beginning and termination of the currency swap by each party. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty for payments made in the same currency at each due date.

Credit derivatives are used by the Company to enhance the return on the Company’s investment portfolio by creating credit exposure similar to an investment in public fixed maturity cash instruments. With credit derivatives the Company sells credit protection on an identified name, or a basket of names in a first to default structure, and in return receives a quarterly premium. With single name credit default derivatives, this premium or credit spread generally corresponds to the difference between the yield on the referenced name’s public fixed maturity cash instruments and swap rates, at the time the agreement is executed. With first to default baskets, the premium generally corresponds to a high proportion of the sum of the credit spreads of the names in the basket. If there is an event of default by the referenced name or one of the referenced names in a basket, as defined by the agreement, then the Company is obligated to pay the counterparty the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the referenced defaulted security or similar security. See Note 15 for a discussion of guarantees related to these credit derivatives. In addition to selling credit protection, in limited instances the Company has purchased credit protection using credit derivatives in order to hedge specific credit exposures in the Company’s investment portfolio.

The Company uses “to be announced” (“TBA”) forward contracts to gain exposure to the investment risk and return of mortgage-backed securities. TBA transactions can help the Company to achieve better diversification and to enhance the return on its investment portfolio. TBAs provide a more liquid and cost effective method of achieving these goals than purchasing or selling individual mortgage-backed pools. Typically, the price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at a specified future date.

In its mortgage operations, the Company enters into commitments to fund commercial mortgage loans at specified interest rates and other applicable terms within specified periods of time. These commitments are legally binding agreements to extend credit to a counterparty. Loan commitments for loans that will be held for sale are recognized as derivatives and recorded at fair value. The determination of the fair value of loan commitments accounted for as derivatives considers various factors including, among others, terms of the related loan, the intended exit strategy for the loans based upon either securitization valuation models or investor purchase commitments, prevailing interest rates, and origination income or expense. Loan commitments that relate to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for investment are not accounted for as derivatives and accordingly are not recognized in the Company’s financial statements. See Note 15 for a further discussion of these loan commitments.

The Company sells variable annuity products, which contain embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are marked to market through “Realized investment gains (losses), net” based on the change in value of the underlying contractual guarantees, which are determined using valuation models. The Company maintains a portfolio of derivative instruments that is intended to economically hedge the risks related to the above products’ features. The derivatives may include, but are not limited to equity options, total return swaps, interest rate swap options, caps, floors, and other instruments. In addition, some variable annuity products feature an automatic rebalancing element to minimize risks inherent in the Company’s guarantees which reduces the need for hedges.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company invests in fixed maturities that, in addition to a stated coupon, provide a return based upon the results of an underlying portfolio of fixed income investments and related investment activity. The Company accounts for these investments as available for sale fixed maturities containing embedded derivatives. Such embedded derivatives are marked to market through “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” based upon the change in value of the underlying portfolio.

The table below provides a summary of the gross notional amount and fair value of derivatives contracts, excluding embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host, by the primary underlying. Many derivative instruments contain multiple underlyings.


	June 30, 2009							December 31, 2008
	Notional Amount		Fair Value					Notional Amount		Fair Value
	Notional Amount		Assets		Liabilities			Notional Amount		Assets		Liabilities
	(in millions)
Qualifying Hedge Relationships
Interest Rate	$	7,661	$	102	$	(516	)	$	6,315	$	124	$	(901	)
Currency		1,036		1		(14	)		1,974		56		(83	)
Currency/Interest Rate		2,392		25		(212	)		2,372		68		(140	)

Total Qualifying Hedge Relationships	$	11,089	$	128	$	(742	)	$	10,661	$	248	$	(1,124	)

Non-qualifying Hedge Relationships
Interest Rate	$	84,639	$	2,651	$	(2,311	)	$	81,280	$	6,013	$	(3,610	)
Currency		9,140		185		(196	)		6,286		243		(380	)
Credit		3,723		344		(240	)		3,100		397		(308	)
Currency/Interest Rate		5,726		128		(156	)		6,173		686		(518	)
Equity		6,541		1,355		(93	)		7,306		1,915		(7	)

Total Non-qualifying Hedge Relationships	$	109,769	$	4,663	$	(2,996	)	$	104,145	$	9,254	$	(4,823	)

Total Derivatives(1)	$	120,858	$	4,791	$	(3,738	)	$	114,806	$	9,502	$	(5,947	)

(1)

Excludes embedded derivatives which contain multiple underlyings. The fair value of these embedded derivatives was a liability of $1,522 million as of June 30, 2009 and a liability of $3,942 million as of December 31, 2008, included in “Future policy benefits” and “Fixed maturities, available for sale.”

Cash Flow, Fair Value and Net Investment Hedges

The primary derivative instruments used by the Company in its fair value, cash flow, and net investment hedge accounting relationships are interest rate swaps, currency swaps and currency forwards. These instruments are only designated for hedge accounting in instances where the appropriate criteria are met. The Company does not use futures, options, credit, equity or embedded derivatives in any of its fair value, cash flow or net investment hedge accounting relationships.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The following table provides the financial statement classification and impact of derivatives used in qualifying and non-qualifying hedge relationships, excluding the offset of the hedged item in an effective hedge relationship:


	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Qualifying Hedges
Fair value hedges
Interest Rate
Realized investment gains (losses), net	$	208		$	227		$	304		$	21
Net investment income		(40	)		(33	)		(80	)		(46	)
Interest expense—(increase)/decrease		—			—			1			—
Interest credited to policyholder account balances—(increase)/decrease		17			21			29			7
Currency
Realized investment gains (losses), net		—			—			—			(3	)
Net investment income		—			(1	)		—			(12	)
Other income		—			—			2			38

Total fair value hedge	$	185		$	214		$	256		$	5

Cash flow hedges
Interest Rate
Interest expense—(increase)/decrease	$	(4	)	$	(3	)	$	(8	)	$	(4	)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances—(increase)/decrease		(2	)		1			(3	)		1
Accumulated other comprehensive income(1)		25			28			47			11
Currency/Interest Rate
Net investment income		(2	)		(4	)		(4	)		(9	)
Interest expense—(increase)/decrease		—			4			—			11
Other income		3			36			(1	)		(33	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income(1)		(111	)		8			(92	)		(92	)

Total cash flow hedges	$	(91	)	$	70		$	(61	)	$	(115	)

Net investment hedges
Currency
Realized investment gains (losses), net(2)	$	27		$	—		$	36		$	(1	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income(1)		(150	)		40			(40	)		70
Currency/Interest Rate
Accumulated other comprehensive income(1)		(78	)		7			(17	)		8

Total net investment hedges	$	(201	)	$	47		$	(21	)	$	77

Non-qualifying hedges
Realized investment gains (losses), net
Interest Rate	$	(1,512	)	$	(292	)	$	(2,052	)	$	(21	)
Currency		(160	)		158			34			(82	)
Currency/Interest Rate		(162	)		(8	)		(131	)		(45	)
Credit		41			101			23			113
Equity		(688	)		(94	)		(486	)		104
Embedded Derivatives (Interest/Equity/Credit)		1,219			180			2,498			(324	)

Total non-qualifying hedges	$	(1,262	)	$	45		$	(114	)	$	(255	)

Total Derivative Impact	$	(1,369	)	$	376		$	60		$	(288	)

(1)	Amounts deferred in Equity.

(2)	Relates to the sale of equity method investments.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the ineffective portion of derivatives accounted for using hedge accounting was not material to the Company’s results of operations and there were no material amounts reclassified into earnings relating to instances in which the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transaction did not occur by the anticipated date or within the additional time period permitted by SFAS No. 133. In addition, there were no instances in which the Company discontinued fair value hedge accounting due to a hedged firm commitment no longer qualifying as a fair value hedge.

Presented below is a roll forward of current period cash flow hedges in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” before taxes:


	(in millions)
Balance, December 31, 2008	$	(227	)
Net deferred losses on cash flow hedges from January 1 to June 30, 2009		(71	)
Amount reclassified into current period earnings		26

Balance, June 30, 2009	$	(272	)

As of June 30, 2009, the Company does not have any qualifying cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions other than those related to the variability of the payment or receipt of interest or foreign currency amounts on existing financial instruments. The maximum length of time for which these variable cash flows are hedged is 14 years. Income amounts deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” as a result of cash flow hedges are included in “Net unrealized investment gains (losses)” in the Consolidated Statements of Equity.

For effective net investment hedges, the amounts, before applicable taxes, recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account within “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” were losses of $228 million and gains of $47 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and losses of $57 million and gains of $78 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Credit Derivatives Written

The following tables set forth the Company’s exposure from credit derivatives where the Company has written credit protection, excluding a credit derivative related to surplus notes issued by a subsidiary of Prudential Insurance and embedded derivatives contained in externally-managed investments in the European market, by NAIC rating of the underlying credits as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.


NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009
		Single Name				First to Default Basket(1)					Total
		Notional		Fair Value		Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	318	$	1	$	188	$	(8	)	$	506	$	(7	)
2	Baa		35		—		315		(27	)		350		(27	)

	Subtotal Investment Grade		353		1		503		(35	)		856		(34	)
3	Ba		—		—		262		(35	)		262		(35	)
4	B		—		—		—		—			—		—
5	C and lower		—		—		50		(9	)		50		(9	)
6	In or near default		—		—		—		—			—		—

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		—		—		312		(44	)		312		(44	)

Total			$353	$	1	$	815	$	(79	)	$	1,168	$	(78	)

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)


NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	December 31, 2008
		Single Name					First to Default Basket(1)					Total
		Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	340	$	(10	)	$	213	$	(19	)	$	553	$	(29	)
2	Baa		5		—			542		(85	)		547		(85	)

	Subtotal Investment Grade		345		(10	)		755		(104	)		1,100		(114	)
3	Ba		—		—			15		(2	)		15		(2	)
4	B		—		—			—		—			—		—
5	C and lower		5		—			102		(32	)		107		(32	)
6	In or near default		—		—			—		—			—		—

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		5		—			117		(34	)		122		(34	)

Total			$350	$	(10	)	$	872	$	(138	)	$	1,222	$	(148	)

(1)	First-to-default credit swap baskets, which may include credits of varying qualities, are grouped above based on the lowest credit in the basket. However, such basket swaps may entail greater credit risk than the rating level of the lowest credit.

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s credit derivatives where the Company has written credit protection excluding the credit derivative related to surplus notes issued by a subsidiary of Prudential Insurance and embedded derivatives contained in externally-managed investments in the European market, by industry category as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009					December 31, 2008
Industry	Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Corporate Securities:
Manufacturing	$	45	$	—		$	45	$	(1	)
Utilities		5		—			5		—
Finance		—		—			—		—
Services		28		—			25		—
Energy		20		1			20		(1	)
Transportation		30		—			30		(1	)
Retail and Wholesale		30		—			30		(1	)
Other		195		—			195		(6	)
First to Default Baskets(1)		815		(79	)		872		(138	)

Total Credit Derivatives	$	1,168	$	(78	)	$	1,222	$	(148	)

(1)	Credit default baskets may include various industry categories.

The Company entered into a credit derivative that will require the Company to make certain payments in the event of deterioration in the value of the surplus notes issued by a subsidiary of Prudential Insurance. The notional of this credit derivative is $500 million and the fair value as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, was a liability of $53 million and $16 million, net of $53 million and $125 million of collateral that has been pledged, respectively.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Company holds certain externally-managed investments in the European market which contain embedded derivatives whose fair value are primarily driven by changes in credit spreads. These investments are medium term notes that are collateralized by investment portfolios primarily consisting of investment grade European fixed income securities, including corporate bonds and asset-backed securities, and derivatives, as well as varying degrees of leverage. The notes have a stated coupon and provide a return based on the performance of the underlying portfolios and the level of leverage. The Company invests in these notes to earn a coupon through maturity, consistent with its investment purpose for other debt securities. The notes are accounted for under U.S. GAAP as available for sale fixed maturity securities with bifurcated embedded derivatives (total return swaps). Changes in the value of the fixed maturity securities are reported in Equity under the heading “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)” and changes in the market value of the embedded total return swaps are included in current period earnings in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these investments was $1,079 million and $1,095 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

In addition to writing credit protection, the Company has purchased credit protection using credit derivatives in order to hedge specific credit exposures in the Company’s investment portfolio. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $2.055 billion and $1.378 billion of outstanding notional amounts, reported at fair value as an asset of $235 million and an asset of $253 million, respectively.

Types of Derivative Instruments and Derivative Strategies used in a broker/dealer capacity

Futures, forwards and options contracts, and swap agreements, are also used in a derivative dealer or broker capacity in the Company’s commodities operations to facilitate transactions of the Company’s clients, hedge proprietary trading activities and as a means of risk management. These derivatives allow the Company to structure transactions to manage its exposure to commodities and securities prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Risk exposures are managed through diversification, by controlling position sizes and by entering into offsetting positions. For example, the Company may manage the risk related to its precious metals inventory by entering into an offsetting position in exchange traded futures contracts.

The fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts used in a derivative dealer or broker capacity is reported on a net-by-counterparty basis in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Position when management believes a legal right of setoff exists under an enforceable netting agreement.

Realized and unrealized gains and losses from marking-to-market the derivatives used in proprietary positions are recognized on a trade date basis and reported in “Asset management fees and other income.”

The following table sets forth the income statement impact of derivatives used in a broker/dealer capacity.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009			Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	(in millions)
Asset management fees and other income
Interest Rate	$	(5	)	$	(3	)
Commodity		14			29
Currency		11			20
Equity		2			4

Total asset management fees and other income	$	22		$	50

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Credit Risk

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to financial derivative transactions. The Company manages credit risk by entering into derivative transactions with major international financial institutions and other creditworthy counterparties, and by obtaining collateral where appropriate. Additionally, limits are set on single party credit exposures which are subject to periodic management review.

The credit exposure of the Company’s over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions is represented by the contracts with a positive fair value (market value) at the reporting date. To reduce credit exposures, the Company seeks to (i) enter into OTC derivative transactions pursuant to master agreements that provide for a netting of payments and receipts with a single counterparty (ii) enter into agreements that allow the use of credit support annexes (CSAs), which are bilateral rating-sensitive agreements that require collateral postings at established threshold levels. Likewise, the Company effects exchange-traded futures and options transactions through regulated exchanges and these transactions are settled on a daily basis, thereby reducing credit risk exposure in the event of non-performance by counterparties to such financial instruments.

The vast majority of the Company’s OTC derivative agreements are with highly rated major international financial institutions. Consistent with the practice of major international financial institutions, the Company utilizes the credit spread embedded in the LIBOR curve to reflect non-performance risk when determining the fair value of OTC derivative assets and liabilities after consideration of the impacts of the collateral posting process discussed above. This credit spread captures the non-performance risk of the Company’s OTC derivative related assets and liabilities.

Certain of the Company’s derivative agreements with some of its counterparties contain credit-risk related triggers. If the Company’s credit rating were to fall below a certain level, the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request termination at the then fair value of the derivative or demand immediate full collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions. If a downgrade occurred and the derivative positions were terminated, the Company anticipates it would be able to replace the derivative positions with other counterparties in the normal course of business. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position were $621 million as of June 30, 2009. In the normal course of business the Company has posted cash collateral related to these instruments of $595 million as of June 30, 2009. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on June 30, 2009, the Company estimates that it would be required to post a maximum of $26 million of additional collateral to its counterparties.

15. COMMITMENTS AND GUARANTEES, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND LITIGATION AND REGULATORY MATTERS

Commitments and Guarantees

In connection with the Company’s commercial mortgage operations, it originates commercial mortgage loans. At June 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding commercial mortgage loan commitments with borrowers of $2,022 million. In certain of these transactions, the Company prearranges that it will sell the loan to an investor, including to governmental sponsored entities as discussed below, after the Company funds the loan. At June 30, 2009, $1,045 million of the Company’s commitments to originate commercial mortgage loans are subject to such arrangements.

The Company also has other commitments, some of which are contingent upon events or circumstances not under the Company’s control, including those at the discretion of the Company’s counterparties. These other

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

commitments amounted to $9,879 million at June 30, 2009. Reflected in these other commitments are $9,838 million of commitments to purchase or fund investments, including $6,234 million that the Company anticipates will ultimately be funded from its separate accounts. Of these separate account commitments, $2,668 million have recourse to Prudential Insurance if the separate accounts are unable to fund the amounts when due.

In the course of the Company’s business, it provides certain guarantees and indemnities to third parties pursuant to which it may be contingently required to make payments now or in the future.

A number of guarantees provided by the Company relate to real estate investments held in its separate accounts, in which the separate account has borrowed funds, and the Company has guaranteed their obligation to their lender. The Company provides these guarantees to assist the separate account in obtaining financing for the transaction. The Company’s maximum potential exposure under these guarantees was $1,554 million at June 30, 2009, of which all but $278 million is limited to the assets of the separate account for which exposure primarily relates to guarantees limited to fraud, criminal activity or other bad acts. These guarantees generally expire at various times over the next sixteen years. At June 30, 2009, no amounts were accrued as a result of the Company’s assessment that it is unlikely payments will be required. Any payments that may become required of the Company under these guarantees would either first be reduced by proceeds received by the creditor on a sale of the underlying collateral, or would provide the Company with rights to obtain the underlying collateral.

The Company has also provided a guarantee to a syndication of lenders in connection with a retail development project in Singapore that is 50% co-owned by the Company and an unconsolidated real estate fund managed by the Company. The principal provisions in the guarantee require that the loan-to-value ratio of the retail development project be maintained at 60% or lower, based on an external appraisal. A loan-to-value ratio in excess of 60% would require the Company and its co-owner to jointly and severally paydown the loan balance to the 60% level. The current loan-to-value ratio, based on a December 2008 appraisal, is 59.6%. Other obligations under the guarantee include guaranteeing the interest-servicing on the loan on a proportionate basis and undertaking to complete the project and fund all development costs, including cost overruns. The Company’s exposure under the guarantee was $171 million at June 30, 2009, which assumes the co-owner honors its joint guarantee.

As discussed in Note 14, the Company writes credit derivatives under which the Company is obligated to pay the counterparty the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the defaulted security or similar security. The Company’s maximum amount at risk under these credit derivatives, assuming the value of the underlying referenced securities become worthless, is $1,168 million as of June 30, 2009. These credit derivatives generally have maturities of five years or less.

Certain contracts underwritten by the Retirement segment include guarantees related to financial assets owned by the guaranteed party. These contracts are accounted for as derivatives, at fair value, in accordance with SFAS No. 133. At June 30, 2009, such contracts in force carried a total guaranteed value of $6,576 million. These guarantees are supported by collateral that is not reflected on the Company’s balance sheet. This collateral had a fair value of $6,587 million at June 30, 2009.

The Company arranges for credit enhancements of certain debt instruments that provide financing for commercial real estate assets, including certain tax-exempt bond financings. The credit enhancements provide assurances to the debt holders as to the timely payment of amounts due under the debt instruments. At June 30, 2009, such enhancement arrangements total $220 million, with remaining contractual maturities of up to fifteen years. The Company’s obligations to reimburse required credit enhancement payments are secured by mortgages on the related real estate, which properties are valued at $275 million at June 30, 2009. The Company receives

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

certain ongoing fees for providing these enhancement arrangements and anticipates the extinguishment of its obligation under these enhancements prior to maturity through the aggregation and transfer of its positions to a substitute enhancement provider. At June 30, 2009, the Company has accrued liabilities of $1 million representing unearned fees on these arrangements.

As part of the commercial mortgage activities of the Company’s Asset Management segment, the Company provides commercial mortgage origination, underwriting and servicing for certain government sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Company has agreed to indemnify the government sponsored entities for a portion of the credit risk associated with certain of the mortgages it services through a delegated authority arrangement. Under these arrangements, the Company originates multi-family mortgages for sale to the government sponsored entities based on underwriting standards they specify, and are obligated to make payments to them for a specified percentage share of losses they incur on certain loans serviced by the Company. The Company’s percentage share of losses incurred generally varies from 2% to 20% of the loan balance, and is typically based on a first-loss exposure for a stated percentage of the loan balance, plus a shared exposure with the government sponsored entity for any losses in excess of the stated first-loss percentage, subject to a contractually specified maximum percentage. The Company services $7,490 million of mortgages subject to these loss-sharing arrangements as of June 30, 2009, all of which are collateralized by first priority liens on the underlying multi-family residential properties. As of June 30, 2009, these mortgages had an average debt service coverage ratio of 1.60 times and an average loan-to-value ratio of 69%. The maximum exposure to loss as of June 30, 2009, assuming no recovery on any of the underlying collateral, is $997 million, with first-loss exposure of $317 million. Over the three years ended December 31, 2008, the Company’s total share of losses related to indemnifications that were settled was $8 million, with no additional settlements in the first six months of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has established a liability of $19 million related to these indemnifications.

In connection with certain acquisitions, the Company has agreed to pay additional consideration in future periods, contingent upon the attainment by the acquired entity of defined operating objectives. At June 30, 2009, maximum potential future consideration pursuant to such arrangements, to be resolved over the following four years, is $130 million. Any such payments would result in increases in intangible assets, such as goodwill.

The Company is also subject to other financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements. The Company has provided indemnities and guarantees related to acquisitions, dispositions, investments and other transactions that are triggered by, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by the Company. These obligations are typically subject to various time limitations, defined by the contract or by operation of law, such as statutes of limitation. In some cases, the maximum potential obligation is subject to contractual limitations, while in other cases such limitations are not specified or applicable. Since certain of these obligations are not subject to limitations, it is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount due under these guarantees. At June 30, 2009, the Company has accrued liabilities of $5 million associated with all other financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements, which does not include retained liabilities associated with sold businesses.

Contingent Liabilities

On an ongoing basis, the Company’s internal supervisory and control functions review the quality of sales, marketing and other customer interface procedures and practices and may recommend modifications or enhancements. From time to time, this review process identifies product administration, servicing or other errors, including errors relating to the timing or amount of payments or contract values due to customers. In such cases, if appropriate, the Company may offer customers remediation and may incur charges, including the cost of such remediation, administrative costs and regulatory fines.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Litigation and Regulatory Matters

The Company is subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of its businesses. Pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings relating to aspects of the Company’s businesses and operations that are specific to it and proceedings that are typical of the businesses in which it operates, including in both cases businesses that have either been divested or placed in wind-down status. Some of these proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of complainants. In certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. The outcome of a litigation or regulatory matter, and the amount or range of potential loss at any particular time, is often inherently uncertain.

Individual Life and Group Insurance

In April 2009, a purported nationwide class action, Schultz v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America, was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Plaintiff, a participant in a defined benefit plan governed by ERISA, alleges that pursuant to the terms of the group disability insurance policy funding her plan benefits, Prudential Insurance may not lawfully offset family social security disability benefits against Prudential contract benefits because social security benefits that members of her family received on account of her disability were not “loss of time” disability payments. The complaint alleges violations of ERISA, breach of contract and unfair claims practices. Plaintiff seeks recovery of the amount of her disability benefits were reduced by the challenged offset, and additional monetary, declaratory and injunctive relief on behalf of a putative class of similarly situated disability claimants who are covered under other plans or policies governed by ERISA and on behalf of a putative class of similarly situated disability claimants who are participants in plans that are exempt from ERISA.

In November 2008, a purported nationwide class action, Garcia v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint, which is brought on behalf of beneficiaries of Prudential policies whose death benefits were placed in retained asset accounts, alleges that by investing the death benefits in these accounts, Prudential wrongfully delayed payment and improperly retained undisclosed profits. It alleges claims of breach of the contract of insurance, breach of contract with regard to the retained asset accounts, breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment, and seeks an accounting, disgorgement, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest. In March 2009, Prudential filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.

From November 2002 to March 2005, eleven separate complaints were filed against the Company and the law firm of Leeds Morelli & Brown in New Jersey state court. The cases were consolidated for pre-trial proceedings in New Jersey Superior Court, Essex County and captioned Lederman v. Prudential Financial, Inc., et al. The complaints allege that an alternative dispute resolution agreement entered into among Prudential Insurance, over 350 claimants who are current and former Prudential Insurance employees, and Leeds Morelli & Brown (the law firm representing the claimants) was illegal and that Prudential Insurance conspired with Leeds Morelli & Brown to commit fraud, malpractice, breach of contract, and violate racketeering laws by advancing legal fees to the law firm with the purpose of limiting Prudential’s liability to the claimants. In 2004, the Superior Court sealed these lawsuits and compelled them to arbitration. In May 2006, the Appellate Division reversed the trial court’s decisions, held that the cases were improperly sealed, and should be heard in court rather than arbitrated. In March 2007, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint to add over 200 additional plaintiffs and a claim under the New Jersey discrimination law but denied without prejudice plaintiffs’ motion for a joint trial on liability issues. In June 2007, Prudential Financial and Prudential Insurance moved to dismiss the

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

complaint. In November 2007, the court granted the motion, in part, and dismissed the commercial bribery and conspiracy to commit malpractice claims, and denied the motion with respect to other claims. In January 2008, plaintiffs filed a demand pursuant to New Jersey law stating that they were seeking damages in the amount of $6.5 billion.

The Company, along with a number of other insurance companies, received formal requests for information from the State of New York Attorney General’s Office (“NYAG”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Connecticut Attorney General’s Office, the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General, the Department of Labor, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of California, the District Attorney of the County of San Diego, and various state insurance departments relating to payments to insurance intermediaries and certain other practices that may be viewed as anti-competitive. In December 2006, Prudential Insurance reached a resolution of the NYAG investigation. Under the terms of the settlement, Prudential Insurance paid a $2.5 million penalty and established a $16.5 million fund for policyholders, adopted business reforms and agreed, among other things, to continue to cooperate with the NYAG in any litigation, ongoing investigations or other proceedings. Prudential Insurance also settled the litigation brought by the California Department of Insurance and agreed to business reforms and disclosures as to group insurance contracts insuring customers or residents in California and to pay certain costs of investigation. In April 2008, Prudential Insurance reached a settlement of proceedings relating to payments to insurance intermediaries and certain other practices with the District Attorneys of San Diego, Los Angeles and Alameda counties. Pursuant to this settlement, Prudential Insurance paid $350,000 in penalties and costs. These matters are also the subject of litigation brought by private plaintiffs, including purported class actions that have been consolidated in the multidistrict litigation in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, In re Employee Benefit Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation. In August and September 2007, the court dismissed the anti-trust and RICO claims. In January and February 2008, the court dismissed the ERISA claims with prejudice and the state law claims without prejudice. Plaintiffs have appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Retirement Solutions and Investment Management

The Company’s subsidiary, Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, formerly named American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation, has substantially completed a remediation program to correct errors in the administration of approximately 11,000 annuity contracts issued by that company. The owners of these contracts did not receive notification that the contracts were approaching or past their designated annuitization date or default annuitization date (both dates referred to as the “contractual annuity date”) and the contracts were not annuitized at their contractual annuity dates. Some of these contracts also were affected by data integrity errors resulting in incorrect contractual annuity dates. The lack of notice and data integrity errors, as reflected on the annuities administrative system, all occurred before the acquisition of the American Skandia entities by the Company. The remediation and administrative costs of the remediation program are subject to the indemnification provisions of the acquisition agreement pursuant to which the Company purchased the American Skandia entities in May 2003 from Skandia Insurance Company Ltd (publ) (“Skandia”).

In October 2007, Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Co. (“PRIAC”) filed an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Prudential Retirement Insurance & Annuity Co. v. State Street Global Advisors, in PRIAC’s fiduciary capacity and on behalf of certain defined benefit and defined contribution plan clients of PRIAC, against an unaffiliated asset manager, State Street Global Advisors (“SSgA”) and SSgA’s affiliate, State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”). This action seeks, among other relief, restitution of certain losses attributable to certain investment funds sold by SSgA as to which PRIAC believes SSgA employed investment strategies and practices that were misrepresented by SSgA and failed to

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

exercise the standard of care of a prudent investment manager. PRIAC also intends to vigorously pursue any other available remedies against SSgA and State Street in respect of this matter. Given the unusual circumstances surrounding the management of these SSgA funds and in order to protect the interests of the affected plans and their participants while PRIAC pursues these remedies, PRIAC implemented a process under which affected plan clients that authorized PRIAC to proceed on their behalf have received payments from funds provided by PRIAC for the losses referred to above. The Company’s consolidated financial statements, and the results of the Retirement segment included in the Company’s Investment Division, for the year ended December 31, 2007 include a pre-tax charge of $82 million, reflecting these payments to plan clients and certain related costs. In September 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the State Street defendants’ motion to dismiss claims for damages and other relief under Section 502(a)(2) of ERISA, but dismissed the claims for equitable relief under Section 502(a)(3) of ERISA. In October 2008, defendants answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims for contribution and indemnification, defamation and violations of Massachusetts’ unfair and deceptive trade practices law.

Securities

Prudential Securities has been named as a defendant in a number of industry-wide purported class actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York relating to its former securities underwriting business. Plaintiffs in one consolidated proceeding, captioned In re: Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, allege, among other things, that the underwriters engaged in a scheme involving tying agreements, undisclosed compensation arrangements and research analyst conflicts to manipulate and inflate the prices of shares sold in initial public offerings in violation of the federal securities laws. Certain issuers of these securities and their current and former officers and directors have also been named as defendants. In October 2004, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in six “focus cases.” In December 2006, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated that decision and remanded the case to the district court for further proceeding. In August 2000, Prudential Securities was named as a defendant, along with other underwriters, in a purported class action, captioned CHS Electronics Inc. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. et al., which alleges on behalf of issuers of securities in initial public offerings that the defendants conspired to fix at 7% the discount that underwriting syndicates receive from issuers in violation of federal antitrust laws. Plaintiffs moved for class certification in September 2004 and for partial summary judgment in November 2005. In April 2006, the district court denied class certification. In September 2007, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision denying class certification and remanded the cases to the district court for further proceedings. In a related action, captioned Gillet v. Goldman Sachs et al., plaintiffs allege substantially the same antitrust claims on behalf of investors, though only injunctive relief is currently being sought. In June 2008, CHS Electronics Inc. and Gillet were settled by all defendants. Prudential Securities’ share of the settlement amount was not material.

Other Matters

Mutual Fund Market Timing Practices

In August 2006, Prudential Equity Group, LLC (“PEG”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, reached a resolution of the previously disclosed regulatory and criminal investigations into deceptive market related activities involving PEG’s former Prudential Securities operations. The settlements relate to conduct that generally occurred between 1999 and 2003 involving certain former Prudential Securities brokers in Boston and certain other branch offices in the U.S., their supervisors, and other members of the Prudential Securities control structure with responsibilities that related to the market timing activities, including certain former members of

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Prudential Securities senior management. The Prudential Securities operations were contributed to a joint venture with Wachovia Corporation in July 2003, but PEG retained liability for the market timing related activities. In connection with the resolution of the investigations, PEG entered into separate settlements with each of the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts (“USAO”), the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Securities Division, SEC, the National Association of Securities Dealers, the New York Stock Exchange, the New Jersey Bureau of Securities and the NYAG. These settlements resolve the investigations by the above named authorities into these matters as to all Prudential entities without further regulatory proceedings or filing of charges so long as the terms of the settlement are followed and provided, in the case of the settlement agreement reached with the USAO, that the USAO has reserved the right to prosecute PEG if there is a material breach by PEG of that agreement during its five year term and in certain other specified events. Under the terms of the settlements, PEG paid $270 million into a Fair Fund administered by the SEC to compensate those harmed by the market timing activities. In addition, $330 million was paid in fines and penalties. Pursuant to the settlements, PEG retained, at PEG’s ongoing cost and expense, the services of an Independent Distribution Consultant acceptable to certain of the authorities to develop a proposed distribution plan for the distribution of Fair Fund amounts according to a methodology developed in consultation with and acceptable to certain of the authorities. In addition, as part of the settlements, PEG agreed, among other things, to continue to cooperate with the above named authorities in any litigation, ongoing investigations or other proceedings relating to or arising from their investigations into these matters. In connection with the settlements, the Company agreed with the USAO, among other things, to cooperate with the USAO and to maintain and periodically report on the effectiveness of its compliance procedures. The settlement documents include findings and admissions that may adversely affect existing litigation or cause additional litigation and result in adverse publicity and other potentially adverse impacts to the Company’s businesses.

In addition to the regulatory proceedings described above that were settled in 2006, in October 2004, the Company and Prudential Securities were named as defendants in several class actions brought on behalf of purchasers and holders of shares in a number of mutual fund complexes. The actions are consolidated as part of a multi-district proceeding, In re: Mutual Fund Investment Litigation, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The complaints allege that the purchasers and holders were harmed by dilution of the funds’ values and excessive fees, caused by market timing and late trading, and seek unspecified damages. In August 2005, the Company was dismissed from several of the actions, without prejudice to repleading the state claims, but remains a defendant in other actions in the consolidated proceeding. In July 2006, in one of the consolidated mutual fund actions, Saunders v. Putnam American Government Income Fund, et al., the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granted plaintiffs leave to refile their federal securities law claims against Prudential Securities. In August 2006, the second amended complaint was filed alleging federal securities law claims on behalf of a purported nationwide class of mutual fund investors seeking compensatory and punitive damages in unspecified amounts. In June 2008, the Company was dismissed with prejudice from the remaining actions consolidated in In re: Mutual Fund Investment Litigation other than Saunders v. Putnam American Government Income Fund, et al. In July 2008, the Company moved for summary judgment and plaintiffs moved for class certification in Saunders.

Commencing in 2003, the Company received formal requests for information from the SEC and NYAG relating to market timing in variable annuities by certain American Skandia entities. In connection with these investigations, with the approval of Skandia, an offer was made by American Skandia to the SEC and NYAG, to settle these matters by paying restitution and a civil penalty of $95 million in the aggregate. In April 2009, AST Investment Services, Inc., formerly named American Skandia Investment Services, Inc. (“ASISI”), reached a resolution of these investigations by the SEC and NYAG into market timing related misconduct involving certain variable annuities. The settlements relate to conduct that generally occurred between January 1998 and September 2003. The Company acquired ASISI from Skandia in May 2003. Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company implemented controls, procedures and measures designed to protect customers from the types of

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

activities involved in these investigations. These settlements resolve the investigations by the above named authorities into these matters, subject to the settlement terms. Under the terms of the settlements, ASISI has paid a total of $34 million in disgorgement and an additional $34 million as a civil money penalty. These amounts will be paid into a Fair Fund administered by the SEC to compensate those harmed by the market timing related activities. In the settlements, ASISI has agreed to retain, at its ongoing cost and expense, the services of an Independent Distribution Consultant acceptable to the Staff of the SEC to develop a proposed distribution plan for the distribution of Fair Fund amounts according to a methodology developed in consultation with and acceptable to the Staff. As part of these settlements, ASISI has undertaken that by the end of 2009 it will undergo a compliance review by an independent third party, who shall issue a report of its findings and recommendations to ASISI’s Board of Directors, the Audit Committee of the Advanced Series Trust Board of Trustees and the Staff of the SEC. In addition, ASISI has agreed, among other things, to continue to cooperate with the SEC and NYAG in any litigation, ongoing investigations or other proceedings relating to or arising from their investigations into these matters. Under the terms of the purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company acquired ASISI from Skandia, the Company was indemnified for the costs of the settlements.

Corporate

In April 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) received a letter demanding that the Board take action to recover allegedly improperly paid compensation to certain current and former employees and executive officers of the Company since at least 2005. The demand is made by a Prudential Financial stockholder, Service Employees International Union Pension Plans Master Trust (“SEIU”), and is one of many that SEIU has sent to large corporations. SEIU claims that the Company must bring an action, under theories of unjust enrichment and corporate waste, to recoup incentive compensation that was based on allegedly flawed economic metrics. SEIU also seeks rescission of exercised stock options because the options were based on mistaken facts concerning the fair value of the Company’s stock. The letter states that between 2005 and 2008 the Company paid cash and equity compensation of approximately $165 million to its senior executives and authorized senior executives to exercise stock options worth approximately $66 million. The letter also demands that the Board enjoin any further approved, but unpaid, compensation payments, overhaul the Company’s compensation structure, and allow stockholders an advisory vote on the Compensation Committee’s report in the Company’s annual proxy statement. SEUI reserves the right to bring a derivative action should the Board decline to act. In May 2009, the Board formed a Special Evaluation Committee, comprised of independent directors, and authorized the Committee to hire outside advisors and experts to assist in its evaluation of the demand letter.

In March 2009, a purported class action, Bauer v. Prudential Financial, et al., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The case names as defendants, the Company, certain Company Directors, the Chief Financial Officer, Controller and former Chief Executive Officer and former Principal Accounting Officer, underwriters and the Company’s independent auditors. The complaint, brought on behalf of purchasers of the Company’s 9% Junior Subordinated Notes (retail hybrid subordinated debt), alleges that the Company’s March 2006 Form S-3 Registration Statement and Prospectus and the June 2008 Prospectus Supplement, both of which incorporated other public filings, contained material misstatements or omissions. In light of the Company’s disclosures in connection with its 2008 financial results, plaintiffs contend that the earlier offering documents failed to disclose impairments in the Company’s asset-backed securities collateralized with subprime mortgages and goodwill associated with certain subsidiaries and other assets, and that the Company had inadequate controls relating to such reporting. The complaint asserts violations of the Securities Act of 1933, alleging Section 11 claims against all defendants, Section 12(a)(2) claims against the Company and underwriters and Section 15 claims against the individual defendants, and seeks unspecified compensatory and recessionary damages, interest, costs, fees, expenses and such injunctive relief as may be deemed appropriate by the court. In April 2009, two additional purported class action complaints were filed in the same court, Haddock v. Prudential

Financial, Inc. et al. and Pinchuk v. Prudential Financial, Inc. et al. The complaints essentially allege the same

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

claims and seek the same relief as Bauer. In June 2009, Pinchuk was voluntarily dismissed and the Haddock and Bauer matters were consolidated. In July 2009, an amended consolidated complaint was filed that added claims regarding contingent liability relating to the auction rate securities markets and reserves relating to annuity contract holders. The complaint restates the claims regarding impairments related to mortgage backed securities. The complaint names all of the same defendants as the prior complaints, with the exception of the Company’s independent auditors.

Other

In September and October 2005, five purported class action lawsuits were filed against the Company, Prudential Securities and PEG claiming that stockbrokers were improperly classified as exempt employees under state and federal wage and hour laws, were improperly denied overtime pay and that improper deductions were made from the stockbrokers’ wages. Two of the stockbrokers’ complaints, Janowsky v. Wachovia Securities, LLC and Prudential Securities Incorporated and Goldstein v. Prudential Financial, Inc., were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Goldstein complaint purports to have been filed on behalf of a nationwide class. The Janowsky complaint alleges a class of New York brokers. Motions to dismiss and compel arbitration were filed in the Janowsky and Goldstein matters, which have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes. The three stockbrokers complaints filed in California Superior Court, Dewane v. Prudential Equity Group, Prudential Securities Incorporated, and Wachovia Securities LLC; DiLustro v. Prudential Securities Incorporated, Prudential Equity Group Inc. and Wachovia Securities; and Carayanis v. Prudential Equity Group LLC and Prudential Securities Inc., purport to have been brought on behalf of classes of California brokers. The Carayanis complaint was subsequently withdrawn without prejudice in May 2006. In June 2006, a purported New York state class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Panesenko v. Wachovia Securities, et al., alleging that the Company failed to pay overtime to stockbrokers in violation of state and federal law and that improper deductions were made from the stockbrokers’ wages in violation of state law. In September 2006, Prudential Securities was sued in Badain v. Wachovia Securities, et al., a purported nationwide class action filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. The complaint alleges that Prudential Securities failed to pay overtime to stockbrokers in violation of state and federal law and that improper deductions were made from the stockbrokers’ wages in violation of state law. In December 2006, these cases were transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation for coordinated or consolidated pre-trial proceedings. In May 2009, a final order was entered by the court approving the settlement of this consolidated action. In October 2006, a class action lawsuit, Bouder v. Prudential Financial, Inc. and Prudential Insurance Company of America, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, claiming that Prudential Insurance failed to pay overtime to insurance agents who were registered representatives in violation of federal and Pennsylvania law, and that improper deductions were made from these agents’ wages in violation of state law. The complaint seeks back overtime pay and statutory damages, recovery of improper deductions, interest, and attorneys’ fees. In March 2008, the court conditionally certified a nationwide class. In March 2008, a purported nationwide class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Wang v. Prudential Financial, Inc. and Prudential Insurance, on behalf of agents who sold the Company’s financial products. The complaint alleges claims that the Company failed to pay overtime and provide other benefits in violation of California and federal law and seeks compensatory and punitive damages in unspecified amounts. In September 2008, Wang was transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and consolidated with the Bouder matter. In January 2009, an amended complaint was filed in the consolidated matter which adds wage claims based on the laws of thirteen additional states. In March 2009, a second amended complaint was filed which dropped the breach of contract claims. The Company moved to dismiss certain of the state claims in the consolidated complaint.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Summary

The Company’s litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, their outcome cannot be predicted. It is possible that the Company’s results of operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation and regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. In light of the unpredictability of the Company’s litigation and regulatory matters, it is also possible that in certain cases an ultimate unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or regulatory matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. Management believes, however, that, based on information currently known to it, the ultimate outcome of all pending litigation and regulatory matters, after consideration of applicable reserves and rights to indemnification, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Statements of Financial Position

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in millions)


	June 30, 2009									December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses			Closed Block Business			Consolidated			Financial Services Businesses			Closed Block Business			Consolidated
ASSETS
Fixed maturities, available for sale, at fair value	$	119,084		$	39,829			158,913		$	119,153		$	38,903		$	158,056
Fixed maturities, held to maturity, at amortized cost		4,935			—			4,935			3,808			—			3,808
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value		14,766			—			14,766			13,875			—			13,875
Other trading account assets, at fair value		3,550			165			3,715			4,216			120			4,336
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value		3,404			2,513			5,917			3,665			2,400			6,065
Commercial mortgage and other loans		23,961			8,733			32,694			24,366			8,748			33,114
Policy loans		4,413			5,443			9,856			4,280			5,423			9,703
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		—			—			—			480			—			480
Other long-term investments		4,170			1,546			5,716			5,383			1,629			7,012
Short-term investments		5,790			1,347			7,137			4,092			1,484			5,576

Total investments		184,073			59,576			243,649			183,318			58,707			242,025
Cash and cash equivalents		11,798			1,693			13,491			13,054			1,974			15,028
Accrued investment income		1,571			660			2,231			1,603			663			2,266
Deferred policy acquisition costs		12,768			1,706			14,474			13,127			1,999			15,126
Deferred income taxes, net		—			—			—			(533	)		1,639			1,106
Other assets		19,142			463			19,605			21,962			403			22,365
Separate account assets		151,266			—			151,266			147,095			—			147,095

TOTAL ASSETS	$	380,618		$	64,098			444,716		$	379,626		$	65,385		$	445,011

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES
Future policy benefits	$	69,699		$	51,695		$	121,394		$	70,221		$	51,730		$	121,951
Policyholders’ account balances		95,680			5,597			101,277			93,991			5,622			99,613
Policyholders’ dividends		628			1,039			1,667			634			1,036			1,670
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		3,467			3,701			7,168			4,288			3,612			7,900
Cash collateral for loaned securities		2,233			1,429			3,662			2,684			1,484			4,168
Income taxes		2,213			(1,436	)		777			364			95			459
Short-term debt		3,643			—			3,643			10,092			443			10,535
Long-term debt		19,231			1,750			20,981			18,540			1,750			20,290
Other liabilities		13,275			931			14,206			17,074			470			17,544
Separate account liabilities		151,266			—			151,266			147,095			—			147,095

Total liabilities		361,335			64,706			426,041			364,983			66,242			431,225

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
EQUITY
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(3,513	)		(1,489	)		(5,002	)		(5,237	)		(2,106	)		(7,343	)
Other attributed equity		22,194			881			23,075			19,529			1,249			20,778

Total attributed equity		18,681			(608	)		18,073			14,292			(857	)		13,435

Noncontrolling interests		602			—			602			351			—			351

Total equity		19,283			(608	)		18,675			14,643			(857	)		13,786

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	380,618		$	64,098		$	444,716		$	379,626		$	65,385		$	445,011

See Notes to Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Financial Information

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Statements of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions)


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009									2008
	Financial Services Businesses			Closed Block Business			Consolidated			Financial Services Businesses			Closed Block Business			Consolidated
REVENUES
Premiums	$	3,320		$	867		$	4,187		$	2,962		$	965		$	3,927
Policy charges and fee income		713			—			713			824			—			824
Net investment income		2,057			778			2,835			2,155			871			3,026
Asset management fees and other income		1,409			37			1,446			816			8			824
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		(875	)		(437	)		(1,312	)		(452	)		(209	)		(661	)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income		548			265			813			—			—			—
Other realized investment gains (losses), net		(1,091	)		(685	)		(1,776	)		(98	)		(139	)		(237	)

Total realized investment gains (losses), net		(1,418	)		(857	)		(2,275	)		(550	)		(348	)		(898	)

Total revenues		6,081			825			6,906			6,207			1,496			7,703

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES
Policyholders’ benefits		2,894			992			3,886			2,918			1,093			4,011
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		1,064			35			1,099			710			35			745
Dividends to policyholders		24			253			277			3			155			158
General and administrative expenses		1,521			131			1,652			1,986			175			2,161

Total benefits and expenses		5,503			1,411			6,914			5,617			1,458			7,075

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF OPERATING JOINT VENTURES		578			(586	)		(8	)		590			38			628

Income tax expense (benefit)		49			(211	)		(162	)		37			23			60

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF OPERATING JOINT VENTURES		529			(375	)		154			553			15			568
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, net of taxes		5			—			5			24			—			24

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		534			(375	)		159			577			15			592
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		21			—			21			(3	)		—			(3	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)		555			(375	)		180			574			15			589
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests		17			—			17			8			—			8

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.	$	538		$	(375	)	$	163		$	566		$	15		$	581

See Notes to Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Financial Information

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Statements of Operations

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in millions)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009									2008
	Financial Services Businesses			Closed Block Business			Consolidated			Financial Services Businesses			Closed Block Business			Consolidated
REVENUES
Premiums	$	6,581		$	1,640		$	8,221		$	6,064		$	1,821		$	7,885
Policy charges and fee income		1,439			—			1,439			1,649			—			1,649
Net investment income		4,125			1,565			5,690			4,275			1,777			6,052
Asset management fees and other income		2,193			52			2,245			1,458			27			1,485
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		(1,957	)		(1,210	)		(3,167	)		(840	)		(360	)		(1,200	)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income		1,206			857			2,063			—			—			—
Other realized investment gains (losses), net		(87	)		(939	)		(1,026	)		(512	)		(98	)		(610	)

Total realized investment gains (losses), net		(838	)		(1,292	)		(2,130	)		(1,352	)		(458	)		(1,810	)

Total revenues		13,500			1,965			15,465			12,094			3,167			15,261

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES
Policyholders’ benefits		6,323			1,904			8,227			5,981			2,065			8,046
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances		2,198			70			2,268			1,312			70			1,382
Dividends to policyholders		20			256			276			60			657			717
General and administrative expenses		4,399			291			4,690			4,063			363			4,426

Total benefits and expenses		12,940			2,521			15,461			11,416			3,155			14,571

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF OPERATING JOINT VENTURES		560			(556	)		4			678			12			690

Income tax expense (benefit)		42			(200	)		(158	)		78			5			83

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF OPERATING JOINT VENTURES		518			(356	)		162			600			7			607
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, net of taxes		(1	)		—			(1	)		67			—			67

INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS		517			(356	)		161			667			7			674
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		22			—			22			(1	)		—			(1	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)		539			(356	)		183			666			7			673
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests		6			—			6			32			—			32

NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.	$	533		$	(356	)	$	177		$	634		$	7		$	641

See Notes to Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Financial Information

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Financial Information

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The supplemental combining financial information presents the consolidated financial position and results of operations for Prudential Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries (together, the “Company”), separately reporting the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. The Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business are both fully integrated operations of the Company and are not separate legal entities. The supplemental combining financial information presents the results of the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business as if they were separate reporting entities and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Company has outstanding two classes of common stock. The Common Stock reflects the performance of the Financial Services Businesses and the Class B Stock reflects the performance of the Closed Block Business.

The Closed Block Business was established on the date of demutualization and includes the assets and liabilities of the Closed Block (see Note 6 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Closed Block). It also includes assets held outside the Closed Block necessary to meet insurance regulatory capital requirements related to products included within the Closed Block; deferred policy acquisition costs related to the Closed Block policies; the principal amount of the IHC debt (as discussed in Note 2 below) and related unamortized debt issuance costs, as well as an interest rate swap related to the IHC debt; and certain other related assets and liabilities. The Financial Services Businesses consist of the U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management, U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance, and International Insurance and Investments divisions and Corporate and Other operations.

2. ALLOCATION OF RESULTS

This supplemental combining financial information reflects the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses directly attributable to the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business, as well as allocations deemed reasonable by management in order to fairly present the financial position and results of operations of the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business on a stand alone basis. While management considers the allocations utilized to be reasonable, management has the discretion to make operational and financial decisions that may affect the allocation methods and resulting assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of each business. In addition, management has limited discretion over accounting policies and the appropriate allocation of earnings between the two businesses. The Company is subject to agreements which provide that, in most instances, the Company may not change the allocation methodology or accounting policies for the allocation of earnings between the Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business without the prior consent of the Class B Stock holders or IHC debt bond insurer.

The Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business participate in separate internal short-term cash management facilities, pursuant to which they invest cash from securities lending and repurchase activities as well as certain trading and operating activities. The net funds invested in these facilities are generally held in investments that are short term, including mortgage-and asset-backed securities. Historically, a proportionate interest in each security held in a commingled portfolio was allocated to the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business as of the balance sheet date, based upon their proportional cash contributions to a single facility. Participation in the commingled facility by the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business was dependent on cash flows arising from the activities noted above, which in turn, under the historical allocation methodology, could change the allocation of the facility’s assets between the two Businesses. A proportionate share of any realized investment gain or loss was recorded by each Business based upon their respective ownership percentages in the commingled facility as of the date of the realized gain or loss.

PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Supplemental Combining Financial Information—(Continued)

Beginning April 1, 2008, management implemented changes in order to permit each Business to hold discrete ownership of its investments in separate facilities without affecting or being affected by the level of participation of the other Business. With these changes, any realized investment gain or loss are recorded by the respective Businesses based upon their discrete ownership of investments in their facility. Beginning in the third quarter of 2007, pending the implementation of these changes, the commingled facility was managed so that the proportionate interests of the Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business in the entire facility were maintained at approximately the same proportions held as of June 30, 2007 (approximately 49% and 51%, respectively).

General corporate overhead not directly attributable to a specific business that has been incurred in connection with the generation of the businesses’ revenues is generally allocated between the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business based on the general and administrative expenses of each business as a percentage of the total general and administrative expenses for all businesses.

Prudential Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc., has outstanding senior secured notes (the “IHC debt”), of which net proceeds of $1.66 billion were allocated to the Financial Services Businesses concurrent with the demutualization on December 18, 2001. The IHC debt is serviced by the cash flows of the Closed Block Business, and the results of the Closed Block Business reflect interest expense associated with the IHC debt.

Income taxes are allocated between the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business as if they were separate companies based on the taxable income or losses and other tax characterizations of each business. If a business generates benefits, such as net operating losses, it is entitled to record such tax benefits to the extent they are expected to be utilized on a consolidated basis.

Holders of Common Stock have no interest in a separate legal entity representing the Financial Services Businesses; holders of the Class B Stock have no interest in a separate legal entity representing the Closed Block Business; and holders of each class of common stock are subject to all of the risks associated with an investment in the Company.

In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, holders of Common Stock and holders of Class B Stock would be entitled to receive a proportionate share of the net assets of the Company that remain after paying all liabilities and the liquidation preferences of any preferred stock.

The results of the Financial Services Businesses are subject to certain risks pertaining to the Closed Block. These include any expenses and liabilities from litigation affecting the Closed Block policies as well as the consequences of certain potential adverse tax determinations. In connection with the sale of the Class B Stock and IHC debt, the cost of indemnifying the investors with respect to certain matters will be borne by the Financial Services Businesses.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) addresses the consolidated financial condition of Prudential Financial as of June 30, 2009, compared with December 31, 2008, and its consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. You should read the following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the MD&A and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as well as the “Risk Factors” section, the statements under “Forward-Looking Statements” and the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

Prudential Financial has two classes of common stock outstanding. The Common Stock, which is publicly traded (NYSE:PRU), reflects the performance of the Financial Services Businesses, while the Class B Stock, which was issued through a private placement and does not trade on any exchange, reflects the performance of the Closed Block Business. The Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business are discussed below.

Financial Services Businesses

Our Financial Services Businesses consist of three operating divisions, which together encompass seven segments, and our Corporate and Other operations. The U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management division consists of our Individual Annuities, Retirement and Asset Management segments. The U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance division consists of our Individual Life and Group Insurance segments. The International Insurance and Investments division consists of our International Insurance and International Investments segments. Our Corporate and Other operations include our real estate and relocation services business, as well as corporate items and initiatives that are not allocated to business segments. Corporate and Other operations also include businesses that have been or will be divested, including our investment in the retail brokerage joint venture with Wachovia Securities, and businesses that we have placed in wind-down status.

We attribute financing costs to each segment based on the amount of financing used by each segment, excluding financing costs associated with corporate debt which costs are reflected in Corporate and Other operations. The net investment income of each segment includes earnings on the amount of capital that management believes is necessary to support the risks of that segment.

We seek growth internally and through acquisitions, joint ventures or other forms of business combinations or investments. Our principal acquisition focus is in our current business lines, both domestic and international.

Closed Block Business

In connection with the demutualization, we ceased offering domestic participating products. The liabilities for our traditional domestic in force participating products were segregated, together with assets, in a regulatory mechanism referred to as the “Closed Block.” The Closed Block is designed generally to provide for the reasonable expectations for future policy dividends after demutualization of holders of participating individual life insurance policies and annuities included in the Closed Block by allocating assets that will be used exclusively for payment of benefits, including policyholder dividends, expenses and taxes with respect to these products. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on the Closed Block. At the time of demutualization, we determined the amount of Closed Block assets so that the Closed Block assets initially had a lower book value than the Closed Block liabilities. We expect that the Closed Block assets will generate sufficient cash flow, together with anticipated revenues from the Closed Block policies, over the life of the Closed Block to fund payments of all expenses, taxes, and policyholder benefits to be paid to, and the

reasonable dividend expectations of, holders of the Closed Block policies. We also segregated for accounting purposes the assets that we need to hold outside the Closed Block to meet capital requirements related to the Closed Block policies. No policies sold after demutualization will be added to the Closed Block, and its in force business is expected to ultimately decline as we pay policyholder benefits in full. We also expect the proportion of our business represented by the Closed Block to decline as we grow other businesses.

Concurrently with our demutualization, Prudential Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial that owns the capital stock of Prudential Insurance, issued $1.75 billion in senior secured notes, which we refer to as the IHC debt. The net proceeds from the issuances of the Class B Stock and IHC debt, except for $72 million used to purchase a guaranteed investment contract to fund a portion of the bond insurance cost associated with that debt, were allocated to the Financial Services Businesses. However, we expect that the IHC debt will be serviced by the net cash flows of the Closed Block Business over time, and we include interest expenses associated with the IHC debt when we report results of the Closed Block Business.

The Closed Block Business consists principally of the Closed Block, assets that we must hold outside the Closed Block to meet capital requirements related to the Closed Block policies, invested assets held outside the Closed Block that represent the difference between the Closed Block assets and Closed Block liabilities and the interest maintenance reserve, deferred policy acquisition costs related to Closed Block policies, the principal amount of the IHC debt and related hedging activities, and certain other related assets and liabilities.

The Closed Block Business is not a separate legal entity from the Financial Services Businesses; however, they are operated as separate entities and are separated for financial reporting purposes. The Financial Services Businesses are not obligated to pay dividends on Closed Block policies. Dividends on Closed Block policies reflect the experience of the Closed Block over time and are subject to adjustment by Prudential Insurance’s Board of Directors. Further, our plan of demutualization provides that we are not required to pay dividends on policies within the Closed Block from assets that are not within the Closed Block and that the establishment of the Closed Block does not represent a guarantee that any certain level of dividends will be maintained.

Executive Summary

Prudential Financial, a financial services leader with approximately $580 billion of assets under management as of June 30, 2009, has operations in the United States, Asia, Europe and Latin America. Through our subsidiaries and affiliates, we offer a wide array of financial products and services, including life insurance, annuities, retirement-related services, mutual funds, investment management, and real estate services. We offer these products and services to individual and institutional customers through one of the largest distribution networks in the financial services industry.

Current Developments

Financial Markets. The global financial markets have experienced extreme stress since the second half of 2007. Volatility and disruption in the global financial markets reached unprecedented levels for the post World War II period. The availability and cost of credit has been materially affected. These factors, combined with recent economic conditions, including depressed home and commercial real estate prices and increasing foreclosures, depressed equity market values, declining business and consumer confidence, and rising unemployment, have precipitated a severe economic recession and concerns of prolonged adverse economic conditions.

As further discussed in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” the U.S. federal government has taken numerous actions to address financial market conditions. These actions include the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program, which is part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, as well as the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF. The TARP Capital Purchase Program involves the issuance by qualifying institutions of preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock to the U.S. Treasury. TALF is designed to provide secured financing for certain types of asset-backed securities, including (as of July 2009) certain high-quality commercial mortgage-backed securities issued before January 1, 2009.

We applied in October 2008 to participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program and on May 14, 2009, we received preliminary approval from the U.S. Treasury to participate in the program. However, on June 1, 2009, we announced that we would not participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. In the first quarter of 2009, we began participating in TALF as an eligible borrower. We continue to evaluate other government sponsored programs for which we may be eligible.

As a result of the volatility and disruption in the global financial markets and in order to manage our liquidity and capital resources, we undertook certain actions during 2008 as described in more detail in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Due to the continuation of the financial market dislocations into 2009 and in order to continue to manage our liquidity and capital resources, we undertook certain additional actions in the first half of 2009, including the following:

•

Issued 36.9 million shares of Prudential Financial Common Stock in a public offering (at a price of $39.00 per share for net proceeds of $1.391 billion) and $1 billion of medium-term notes.

•

Provided notice to Wells Fargo, on June 17, 2009, of the exercise of our “lookback” option put rights related to our minority joint venture interest in Wachovia Securities.

•

Made capital contributions and capital loans to our international insurance operations in Japan totaling $366 million.

•

Borrowed $1.5 billion in the form of collateralized funding agreements from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, or FHLBNY, which was subsequently used to replace inter-company funding agreements between Prudential Insurance and Prudential Financial, previously funded through proceeds from the sale of Prudential Financial’s retail medium-term notes, making the corresponding proceeds available for general corporate purposes.

•

Reduced exposure to short-term financing markets, primarily through planned runoff of commercial paper borrowings.

•

Undertook sales of assets held by some of our affiliates to reduce their borrowing needs.

While the above actions have strengthened our liquidity and capital position, certain of them, as well as our decision to maintain higher levels of cash and short-term investments than in prior periods, have prevented us from investing our resources in an economically optimal manner. For additional information on our liquidity and capital resources, and the actions we undertook in the first half of 2009, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We continue to monitor the liquidity and capital needs of Prudential Financial and its subsidiaries. If the disruption in the credit and capital markets continues or worsens, we will need to take additional capital management actions to maintain capital consistent with our rating objectives, which may include additional internal actions or, if internal resources are insufficient or market conditions continue to deteriorate, further access to external sources of capital, if available.

During the first quarter of 2009, rating agencies downgraded certain ratings of Prudential Financial and its subsidiaries. Downgrades in our claims-paying or credit ratings could potentially, among other things, limit our ability to market products, reduce our competitiveness, increase the number or value of policy surrenders and withdrawals, increase our borrowing costs and potentially make it more difficult to borrow funds, adversely

affect the availability of financial guarantees, such as letters of credit, cause additional collateral requirements or other required payments under certain agreements, allow counterparties to terminate derivative agreements and/or hurt our relationships with creditors or trading counterparties thereby potentially negatively effecting our profitability, liquidity and/or capital. Refer to “—Ratings” for more information.

Our financial condition and results of operations for the first half of 2009 reflect the following:

•

Net income of our Financial Services Businesses attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $538 million and $533 million, respectively, reflecting net realized investment losses and related adjustments in our investment portfolio in both periods and the positive impact of improved financial market conditions during the second quarter of 2009 on reported results of our Individual Annuities segment.

•

Pre-tax net realized investment losses and related adjustments of the Financial Services Businesses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were $872 million and $1,582 million, respectively, primarily reflecting decreases in market value of derivatives used in investment duration management and hedging programs of $519 million and $599 million and other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity and equity securities of $391 million and $1,068 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

•

Net unrealized losses on general account fixed maturity investments of the Financial Services Businesses amounted to $4.352 billion as of June 30, 2009, compared to $6.567 billion as of December 31, 2008. Gross unrealized gains decreased from $4.684 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $3.454 billion as of June 30, 2009 and gross unrealized losses decreased from $11.251 billion to $7.806 billion for the same periods. Net unrealized losses on general account fixed maturity investments of the Closed Block Business amounted to $2.816 billion as of June 30, 2009, compared to $4.035 billion as of December 31, 2008.

•

We continued to have positive net flows in our domestic annuity, retirement and asset management businesses, as well as solid sales in our domestic and international insurance businesses, in the second quarter and first six months of 2009.

•

Individual Annuity gross sales for the second quarter of 2009 reached a record high of $3.4 billion, an increase from $2.8 billion in the prior year quarter. Individual Annuity net sales for the second quarter of 2009 were $2.0 billion, an increase from $518 million in the prior year quarter, and were $2.7 billion in the first six months of 2009, an increase from $1.1 billion in the prior year.

•

As of June 30, 2009, Prudential Financial, the parent holding company, had cash and short-term investments of $4.735 billion after repayment during the second quarter of 2009 of $1.8 billion principal amount of Prudential Financial convertible debt securities.

100

Results of Operations

We analyze performance of the segments and Corporate and Other operations of the Financial Services Businesses using a measure called adjusted operating income. See “—Consolidated Results of Operations” for a definition of adjusted operating income and a discussion of its use as a measure of segment operating performance.

Shown below are the contributions of each segment and Corporate and Other operations to our adjusted operating income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and a reconciliation of adjusted operating income of our segments and Corporate and Other operations to income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Adjusted operating income before income taxes for segments of the Financial Services Businesses:
Individual Annuities	$	432		$	154		$	449		$	269
Retirement		99			141			258			265
Asset Management		33			190			32			309
Individual Life		138			103			178			199
Group Insurance		105			80			198			170
International Insurance		465			453			890			866
International Investments		16			26			26			51
Corporate and Other		(162	)		(20	)		(328	)		(71	)
Reconciling Items:
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments		(872	)		(527	)		(1,582	)		(1,192	)
Charges related to realized investment gains (losses), net		(5	)		41			39			28
Investment gains (losses) on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, net		686			(123	)		831			(385	)
Change in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes		(347	)		94			(392	)		294
Divested businesses		(24	)		10			(56	)		(57	)
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests		14			(32	)		17			(68	)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures for Financial Services Businesses		578			590			560			678
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for Closed Block Business		(586	)		38			(556	)		12

Consolidated income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	(8	)	$	628		$	4		$	690

Results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 presented above reflect the following:

•

Individual Annuities segment results for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 increased in comparison to the prior year periods, primarily reflecting the impact of improved market conditions. Results for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 included $416 million and $89 million, respectively, of benefits related to both reserve releases and decreases in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs, due to market appreciation. Also impacting results was a $468

101

million unfavorable variance in the three month period and a $890 million favorable variance in the six month period, related to the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features. These variances were largely driven by changes in our adjustment to the embedded derivative liabilities for market-perceived non-performance risk, and resulted in a corresponding $416 million decrease in the three month period, and $664 million increase in the six month period, in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs. Also contributing to results in both periods was a decrease in fee income, driven by lower average variable annuity asset balances invested in separate accounts.

•

Retirement segment results for the second quarter and first six months of 2009 decreased in comparison to the corresponding prior year periods, primarily driven by a decline in asset management fees, due to a decrease in average full service fee-based retirement account values, primarily resulting from equity market depreciation. Partially offsetting the decline in the six month period was improved investment results in our full service business.

•

Asset Management segment results for the second quarter of 2009 decreased in comparison to the second quarter of 2008, largely attributable to unfavorable results from the segment’s proprietary investing activities and commercial mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as lower asset management and transaction fees. These items were partially offset by a decrease in compensation costs. Results for the first six months of 2009 decreased due to less favorable results from the segment’s proprietary investing activities and commercial mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as lower asset management fees, performance based incentive fees and transaction fees, partially offset by lower compensation costs.

•

Individual Life segment results for the second quarter of 2009 improved from the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, net of related amortization of unearned revenue reserves, primarily reflecting favorable separate account fund performance. Favorable mortality experience, net of reinsurance, also contributed to the improvement in adjusted operating income partially offset by a decrease in asset based fees. Results for the first six months of 2009 declined from the first six months of 2008 primarily due to a decrease in asset based fees due to lower separate account asset balances resulting from the unfavorable impact of equity market performance in late 2008 and early 2009.

•

Group Insurance segment results improved in both the second quarter of 2009 and the first six months of 2009, reflecting more favorable claims experience in both our group life and group disability businesses.

•

The International Insurance segment is comprised of its Life Planner and Gibraltar Life operations. Results from the segment’s Life Planner operations improved in both the second quarter of 2009 and the first six months of 2009, reflecting a $25 million benefit from the migration to a new policy valuation system and from the continued growth of our Japanese Life Planner operation. Results from the segment’s Gibraltar Life operation declined in both the second quarter of 2009 and the first six months of 2009, reflecting a $7 million detriment from the migration to a new policy valuation system and higher general and administrative expenses.

•

International Investments segment results declined in both the second quarter of 2009 and the first six months of 2009, reflecting lower results from the segment’s Korean asset management operation and global commodities group.

•

Corporate and Other results for the second quarter of 2009 declined from the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to increased interest expense on a higher level of capital debt and lower investment earnings. Results for the first six months of 2009 declined from the first six months of 2008 primarily due to lower investment earnings, increased interest expense on capital debt and greater losses in our real estate and relocation services business.

•

Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments for the Financial Services Businesses in the second quarter and first six months of 2009 amounted to a loss of $872 million and $1,582 million,

102

respectively, primarily reflecting other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity and equity securities of $391 million and $1,068 million, respectively, as well as decreases in the fair value of derivative used in investment duration management and hedging programs of $519 million and $599 million, respectively.

•

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes in the Closed Block Business decreased $624 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008, and $568 million for the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008. Results in both periods of 2009 reflect higher net realized investment losses and a decrease in net investment income, which were partially offset by the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation which was reduced to zero.

Accounting Policies & Pronouncements

Application of Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP, requires the application of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree of judgment. Management, on an ongoing basis, reviews estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements. If management determines that modifications in assumptions and estimates are appropriate given current facts and circumstances, results of operations and financial position as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements could change significantly.

Management believes the accounting policies relating to the following areas are most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions:

•

Valuation of investments, including the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments;

•

Policyholder liabilities;

•

Deferred policy acquisition costs;

•

Goodwill;

•

Pension and other postretirement benefits;

•

Taxes on income; and

•

Reserves for contingencies, including reserves for losses in connection with unresolved legal matters.

See below for an updated discussion of the application of estimates and assumptions around Goodwill. For an updated discussion of the application of estimates and assumptions around the valuation of investments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.” For an updated discussion of the application of estimates and assumptions around the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments, see “Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Other-than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities.”

A discussion of each of the remaining critical accounting estimates may be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Accounting Policies & Pronouncements—Application of Critical Accounting Estimates.”

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of December 31 of each year and more frequently if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate a potential for impairment. The test is performed at the

103

reporting unit level which is equal to or one level below our operating segments. Reporting units that have goodwill subject to testing are the Asset Management segment, the International Insurance segment’s Life Planners business, and the Retirement segment’s full service business.

The Company did not evaluate goodwill for impairment as of June 30, 2009, as no events occurred or circumstances changed that would have more likely than not reduced the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount during the second quarter of 2009. The carrying value of goodwill was $706 million as of June 30, 2009. Significant market declines or other events impacting the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill, or increases in the level of equity required to support these reporting units, could result in an impairment of some or all of the goodwill in future periods, resulting in a charge to “General and administrative expenses.”

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

See Note 2 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently adopted accounting pronouncements, including the adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”, FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” FSP APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement),” FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities,” and SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.

104

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following table summarizes income from continuing operations for the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business as well as other components comprising net income.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Financial Services Businesses by segment:
Individual Annuities	$	411		$	117		$	399		$	196
Retirement		42			(145	)		(16	)		(265	)
Asset Management		29			188			11			337

Total U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management Division		482			160			394			268
Individual Life		201			169			210			129
Group Insurance		17			(36	)		9			(33	)

Total U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance Division		218			133			219			96
International Insurance		163			174			185			493
International Investments		5			21			7			40

Total International Insurance and Investments Division		168			195			192			533
Corporate and Other		(290	)		102			(245	)		(219	)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures for Financial Services Businesses		578			590			560			678
Income tax expense		49			37			42			78

Income from continuing operations before equity in earnings of operating joint ventures for Financial Services Businesses		529			553			518			600
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures, net of taxes		5			24			(1	)		67

Income from continuing operations for Financial Services Businesses		534			577			517			667
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes		21			(3	)		22			(1	)

Net income—Financial Services Businesses		555			574			539			666
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests		17			8			6			32

Net income attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc.	$	538		$	566		$	533		$	634

Basic income from continuing operations attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share—Common Stock	$	1.21		$	1.34		$	1.23		$	1.50
Diluted income from continuing operations attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share—Common Stock	$	1.20		$	1.33		$	1.23		$	1.49
Basic net income attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share— Common Stock	$	1.25		$	1.33		$	1.28		$	1.50
Diluted net income attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share— Common Stock	$	1.25		$	1.32		$	1.28		$	1.49

Closed Block Business:
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for Closed Block Business	$	(586	)	$	38		$	(556	)	$	12
Income tax expense (benefit)		(211	)		23			(200	)		5

Income (loss) from continuing operations for Closed Block Business		(375	)		15			(356	)		7

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			—			—			—

Net income (loss)—Closed Block Business		(375	)		15			(356	)		7
Less: Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		—			—			—			—

Net income (loss) attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc.	$	(375	)	$	15		$	(356	)	$	7

Basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share—Class B Stock	$	(193.00	)	$	0.50		$	(189.00	)	$	(9.50	)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc. per share—Class B Stock	$	(193.00	)	$	0.50		$	(189.00	)	$	(9.50	)

Consolidated:
Net income attributable to Prudential Financial, Inc.	$	163		$	581		$	177		$	641

105

Results of Operations—Financial Services Businesses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Income (loss) from continuing operations for the Financial Services Businesses decreased $43 million, from income of $577 million in the second quarter of 2008 to income of $534 million in the second quarter of 2009. Results for the current year quarter include a higher level of pre-tax net investment losses in our general account as compared to the prior year quarter. Pre-tax net investment losses also include an unfavorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with certain variable annuity products. This variance was largely driven by changes in our adjustment to the embedded derivative liabilities for market-perceived non-performance risk, and resulted in a related decrease in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs. The decrease in income also reflects lower fee based revenues primarily due to market value declines in customer account values and assets under management. Partially offsetting these items was a benefit related to reserve releases for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products and lower amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs primarily due to market appreciation. In addition, income reflects an increase in other revenues, partially offset by an increase in benefits and expenses, due to changes in value of recorded assets and recorded liabilities that are expected to ultimately accrue to contractholders. On a diluted per share basis, income from continuing operations attributable to the Financial Services Businesses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 of $1.20 per share of Common Stock decreased from $1.33 per share of Common Stock for the three months ended June 30, 2008. We analyze the operating performance of the segments included in the Financial Services Businesses using “adjusted operating income” as described in “—Segment Measures,” below. For a discussion of our segment results on this basis see “—Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment,” below. In addition, for a discussion of the realized investment gains (losses), net attributable to the Financial Services Businesses, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses,” below. For additional information regarding investment income, excluding realized investment gains (losses) see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments,” below.

The direct equity adjustment increased income from continuing operations available to holders of the Common Stock for earnings per share purposes by $11 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $14 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The direct equity adjustment modifies earnings available to holders of the Common Stock and the Class B Stock for earnings per share purposes. The holders of the Common Stock will benefit from the direct equity adjustment as long as reported administrative expenses of the Closed Block Business are less than the cash flows for administrative expenses determined by the policy servicing fee arrangement that is based upon insurance and policies in force and statutory cash premiums. As statutory cash premiums and policies in force in the Closed Block Business decline, we expect the benefit to the Common Stock holders from the direct equity adjustment to decline accordingly. If the reported administrative expenses of the Closed Block Business exceed the cash flows for administrative expenses determined by the policy servicing fee arrangement, the direct equity adjustment will reduce income available to holders of the Common Stock for earnings per share purposes.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Income (loss) from continuing operations for the Financial Services Businesses decreased $150 million, from income of $667 million for the first six months of 2008 to income of $517 million for the first six months of 2009. Results for the current year include a higher level of pre-tax net investment losses in our general account as compared to the prior year. The decrease in income also reflects lower fee based revenues primarily due to market value declines in customer account values and assets under management. Partially offsetting these items was a favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with certain variable annuity products. This variance was largely driven by changes in our adjustment to the embedded derivative liabilities for market-perceived non-performance risk, and resulted in a related increase in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs. In addition, income reflects an increase in other revenues, partially offset by an increase in benefits and expenses, due to changes in value of recorded assets and recorded liabilities that are expected to ultimately accrue to contractholders. On a diluted per share basis, income from continuing operations attributable to the

106

Financial Services Businesses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of $1.23 per share of Common Stock decreased from $1.49 per share of Common Stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We analyze the operating performance of the segments included in the Financial Services Businesses using “adjusted operating income” as described in “—Segment Measures,” below. For a discussion of our segment results on this basis see “—Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment,” below. In addition, for a discussion of the realized investment gains (losses), net attributable to the Financial Services Businesses, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses,” below. For additional information regarding investment income, excluding realized investment gains (losses) see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments,” below.

The direct equity adjustment increased income from continuing operations available to holders of the Common Stock for earnings per share purposes by $22 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $26 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Results of Operations—Closed Block Business

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Income (loss) from continuing operations for the Closed Block Business for the three months ended June 30, 2009, was a loss of $375 million, or $(193.00) per share of Class B Stock, compared to income of $15 million, or $0.50 per share of Class B Stock, for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The direct equity adjustment decreased income from continuing operations available to the Class B Stock holders for earnings per share purposes by $11 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $14 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For a discussion of the results of operations for the Closed Block Business, see “—Results of Operations of Closed Block Business,” below.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Income (loss) from continuing operations for the Closed Block Business for the six months ended June 30, 2009, was a loss of $356 million, or $(189.00) per share of Class B Stock, compared to income of $7 million, or $(9.50) per share of Class B Stock, for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The direct equity adjustment decreased income from continuing operations available to the Class B Stock holders for earnings per share purposes by $22 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $26 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For a discussion of the results of operations for the Closed Block Business, see “—Results of Operations of Closed Block Business,” below.

Segment Measures

In managing our business, we analyze operating performance separately for our Financial Services Businesses and our Closed Block Business. For the Financial Services Businesses, we analyze our segments’ operating performance using “adjusted operating income.” Results of the Closed Block Business for all periods are evaluated and presented only in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Adjusted operating income does not equate to “income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures” or “net income” as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP but is the measure of segment profit or loss we use to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources, and consistent with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” is our measure of segment performance.

Adjusted operating income is calculated for the segments of the Financial Services Businesses by adjusting each segment’s “income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures” for the following items:

•

realized investment gains (losses), net, except as indicated below, and related charges and adjustments;

•

net investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities and changes in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes;

107

•

the contribution to income/loss of divested businesses that have been or will be sold or exited that do not qualify for “discontinued operations” accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP; and

•

equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests.

The items above are important to an understanding of our overall results of operations. Adjusted operating income is not a substitute for income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and our definition of adjusted operating income may differ from that used by other companies. However, we believe that the presentation of adjusted operating income as we measure it for management purposes enhances understanding of our results of operations by highlighting the results from ongoing operations and the underlying profitability of the Financial Services Businesses.

Adjusted operating income excludes “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” except as indicated below, and related charges and adjustments. A significant element of realized investment gains and losses are impairments and credit-related and interest rate-related gains and losses from sales of securities. Impairments and losses from sales of credit-impaired securities, the timing of which depends largely on market credit cycles, can vary considerably across periods. The timing of other sales that would result in gains or losses, such as interest rate-related gains or losses, is largely subject to our discretion and influenced by market opportunities, as well as our tax and capital profile. Trends in the underlying profitability of our businesses can be more clearly identified without the fluctuating effects of these transactions. Similarly, adjusted operating income excludes investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities and changes in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes, because these recorded changes in asset and liability values are expected to ultimately accrue to the contractholders. Adjusted operating income excludes the results of divested businesses because they are not relevant to understanding our ongoing operating results. The contributions to income/loss of wind-down businesses that we have not divested remain in adjusted operating income. See Note 11 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the presentation of segment results.

As noted above, certain “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” are included in adjusted operating income. We include in adjusted operating income the portion of our realized investment gains and losses on derivatives that arise from the termination of contracts used to hedge our foreign currency earnings in the same period that the expected earnings emerge. Similarly, we include in adjusted operating income the portion of realized investment gains and losses on derivatives that represent current period yield adjustments. The realized investment gains or losses from products that are free standing derivatives, or contain embedded derivatives, along with the realized investment gains or losses from associated derivative portfolios that are part of an economic hedging program related to the risk of these products, are included in adjusted operating income. Adjusted operating income also includes those realized investment gains and losses that represent profit or loss of certain of our businesses which primarily originate investments for sale or syndication to unrelated investors.

108

Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment

U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management Division

Individual Annuities

Operating Results

The following table sets forth the Individual Annuities segment’s operating results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Operating results:
Revenues	$	115		$	622		$	2,007		$	1,195
Benefits and expenses		(317	)		468			1,558			926

Adjusted operating income		432			154			449			269
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(1)		4			(52	)		(18	)		(105	)
Related charges(1)(2)		(25	)		15			(32	)		32

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	411		$	117		$	399		$	196

(1)

Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related charges and adjustments. The related charges represent payments related to the market value adjustment features of certain of our annuity products. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

(2)	Benefits and expenses exclude related charges which represent the unfavorable (favorable) impact of Realized investment gains (losses), net, on change in reserves and the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements and value of business acquired.

Adjusted Operating Income

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $278 million, from $154 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $432 million in the second quarter of 2009. Adjusted operating income for the second quarter of 2009 included $416 million of benefits related to the quarterly adjustments to the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products and to our estimate of total gross profits used as a basis for amortizing deferred policy acquisition and other costs. The $416 million of benefits included $328 million relating to the quarterly market performance adjustments and $88 million relating to the quarterly adjustments for current period experience, and were driven by market appreciation in the second quarter of 2009 as discussed below. Adjusted operating income for the second quarter of 2008 included $6 million of benefits related to the quarterly adjustments for current period experience. Partially offsetting these benefits was a $468 million unfavorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features, largely driven by a reduction to our adjustment for market-perceived non-performance risk as discussed below. A corresponding decrease in current period gross profits related to this unfavorable variance led to an offsetting decrease in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs of $416 million. In addition, fee income decreased, driven by lower average variable annuity asset balances invested in separate accounts. The declines in separate account assets were due to market depreciation and transfers of balances to a fixed general account option over the twelve months ending June 30, 2009. The transfer of balances to our general account relates to an automatic rebalancing element in some of our living benefit features, which, as part of the overall product design, transferred approximately $5 billion of net investments out of the separate accounts and into our general account over the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to equity market declines. Higher average annuity account values invested in our general account resulting from these transfers also led to improved investment results, which partially offset the decrease in fee income.

109

The $328 million of benefits in the second quarter of 2009 relating to the quarterly market performance adjustments referred to above, including $233 million relating to releases of reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products and $95 million relating to decreases to the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs, reflect market performance related adjustments to our estimate of total gross profits to reflect actual fund performance in the second quarter of 2009. The actual rate of return on variable annuity account values for the second quarter of 2009 was 12.7% compared to our previously expected rate of return of 2.6%. In light of recent market conditions, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 we determined that adjustments to our estimate of total gross profits to reflect actual fund performance and any corresponding changes to the future rate of return assumptions should no longer be dependent on a comparison to a statistically generated range of estimated gross profits. Instead, for purposes of evaluating deferred policy acquisition and other costs and the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products, total estimated gross profits are updated for these items each quarter. The better than expected market return in the second quarter of 2009 increased our estimates of total gross profits by establishing a new, higher starting point for the variable annuity account values used in estimating gross profits for future periods. The previously expected rate of return for the second quarter of 2009 was based upon our current maximum future rate of return assumption under the reversion to the mean approach, as discussed below. The increase in our estimate of total gross profits results in a lower required rate of amortization, which is applied to all prior periods’ gross profits. The resulting cumulative adjustment to prior amortization is recognized in the current period. In addition, the lower rate of amortization will also be applied to future gross profits in calculating amortization in future periods which, all else being equal, will result in higher net profits in future periods.

We continue to derive our future rate of return assumptions using a reversion to the mean approach, a common industry practice. Under this approach, we consider actual returns over a period of time and initially adjust future projected returns over a four year period so that the assets grow at the long-term expected rate of return for the entire period. However, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing through the second quarter of 2009, the projected future annual rate of return calculated using the reversion to the mean approach for most contract groups was greater than 10.5%, our current maximum future rate of return assumption across all asset types for this business. In those cases, we utilize the maximum future rate of return over the four year period, thereby limiting the impact of the reversion to the mean on our estimate of total gross profits. Further or continued market volatility could result in additional market value changes within our separate account assets and corresponding changes to our gross profits, as well as additional adjustments to the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs, and the costs relating to the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products. Given that the estimates of future gross profits are based upon our maximum future rate of return assumption for most contract groups as discussed above, all else being equal, future quarterly rates of return higher or lower than 2.6% will result in decreases or increases in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs, and the costs relating to the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products.

The quarterly adjustments for current period experience referred to above reflect the cumulative impact of differences between actual gross profits for the period and the previously estimated expected gross profits for the period, as well as an update for current and future expected claims costs associated with the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products. To the extent each period’s actual experience differs from the previous estimate for that period, the assumed level of total gross profits may change, and a cumulative adjustment to previous periods’ amortization, referred to as an adjustment for current period experience, may be required in the current period. This adjustment to previous periods’ amortization is in addition to the direct impact of actual gross profits on current period amortization and the market performance related adjustment to our estimates of gross profits for future periods. The $88 million of benefits in the second quarter of 2009 relating to the quarterly adjustments for current period experience included a $47 million decrease to the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs and $41 million relating to releases of reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products. The adjustment for deferred policy acquisition and other costs reflects a reduction in amortization due to better than

110

expected gross profits, resulting primarily from a favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features excluding the adjustment for non-performance risk, as described below, and better than expected lapse experience. The adjustment for the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products primarily reflects higher than expected fee income as well as lower than expected actual contract guarantee claims costs in the second quarter of 2009.

The $468 million unfavorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features referred to above reflects a charge of $474 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to a charge of $6 million in the second quarter of 2008. The charge in the second quarter of 2009 includes $660 million related to a reduction in our adjustment to the embedded derivative liabilities for the market’s perception of our non-performance risk. Under SFAS No. 157 we are required to incorporate our own risk of non-performance in the valuation of the embedded derivative liabilities associated with our living benefit features. To reflect our market-perceived non-performance risk, in addition to the risk premium inherent in the London Interbank Offered Rate (or LIBOR), we incorporate an additional spread over LIBOR into the discount rate used in the valuation of the embedded derivative liabilities. The reduction in the non-performance risk adjustment in the second quarter of 2009 was primarily driven by the application of this additional spread over LIBOR to an overall lower level of embedded derivative liabilities, resulting from the impact of improved market conditions and higher interest rates. A decrease in the additional spread over LIBOR in the second quarter 2009 also contributed to the reduction in our adjustment for market-perceived non-performance risk. For additional information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with our living benefit features, including the inputs for non-performance risk, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Variable Annuity Optional Living Benefit Features.”

Excluding the $660 million charge related to our adjustment for market perceived non-performance risk, the capital markets hedging activities resulted in a $186 million benefit in second quarter of 2009, reflecting a $1,697 million benefit related to the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives, partially offset by an $1,511 million charge related to the change in the fair value of the related hedge positions. This benefit was primarily driven by the out-performance of the underlying separate account funds relative to the performance of the market indices we utilize as a basis for developing our hedging strategy. The capital markets hedging activities for the second quarter of 2008 resulted in a $6 million charge, reflecting a $151 million charge related to the change in the fair value of the hedge positions, partially offset by a $145 million benefit related to the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives. Given the sensitivity of the fair value of both the embedded derivatives and related hedge positions to financial market conditions, the variance related to the mark-to-market of these items for a given period will be largely dependent on the financial market conditions throughout the period.

The primary risk exposures of these optional living benefit features relate to actual deviations from, or changes to, the assumptions used in their original pricing, including equity market returns, interest rates, market volatility, timing of annuitization and withdrawals, contract lapses and contractholder mortality. Together with certain product design elements, our capital markets hedging program is designed to limit our exposure to the equity market, interest rate, and market volatility risk inherent in the living benefit features of certain variable annuity products, as part of our overall risk management strategy. A decrease in the availability or an increase in the cost of the derivative hedging instruments used in these capital markets hedging activities could have an adverse impact on our results of operations going forward. Changes in our market-perceived non-performance risk or changes in the actuarial assumptions around the timing of annuitization and withdrawals, contract lapses and contractholder mortality could also result in fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with our living benefit features and could positively or negatively impact our results of operations going forward.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $180 million, from $269 million in the first six months of 2008 to $449 million in the first six months of 2009. Included within this increase is a

111

$890 million favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features largely driven by changes in our market-perceived non-performance risk as discussed below. A corresponding increase in current period gross profits related to this favorable variance led to an offsetting increase in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs of $664 million. Adjusted operating income for the first six months of 2009 also included $89 million of benefits related to the quarterly adjustments to the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products and to our estimate of total gross profits used as a basis for amortizing deferred policy acquisition and other costs. The $89 million of benefits included $65 million relating to the quarterly adjustments for current period experience and $24 million relating to the quarterly market performance adjustments, and were driven by market appreciation in the first six months of 2009 as discussed below. Adjusted operating income for the first six months of 2008 included $9 million of charges related to the quarterly adjustments for current period experience. Partially offsetting these items was a decrease in fee income, driven by lower average variable annuity asset balances invested in separate accounts. The declines in separate account assets were due to market depreciation and transfers of balances to a fixed general account option over the twelve months ended June 30, 2009. The transfer of balances to our general account relates to an automatic rebalancing element in some of our living benefit features, which, as part of the overall product design, transferred approximately $5 billion of investments out of the separate accounts and into our general account over the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, due to equity market declines. Higher average annuity account values invested in our general account resulting from these transfers also led to improved investment results, which partially offset the decrease in fee income.

The $890 million favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features referred to above reflects a benefit of $844 million in the first six months of 2009 compared to a charge of $46 million in the first six months of 2008. The benefit in the first six months of 2009 includes $651 million of benefits related to updates of the inputs used in the valuation of the embedded derivative liabilities, including a $559 million benefit related to an update to reflect a market-perceived increase in our own risk of non-performance, and a $92 million benefit reflecting inclusion of new market inputs for implied volatility. In light of recent developments, including rating agency downgrades to the claims-paying ratings of our insurance subsidiaries, beginning in the first quarter of 2009, we incorporated an additional spread over LIBOR into the discount rate used in the valuation of the embedded derivative liabilities to reflect an increase in our market perceived non-performance risk, thereby reducing the value of the embedded derivative liabilities. For additional information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with our living benefit features, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Variable Annuity Optional Living Benefit Features.”

Excluding the $651 million of benefits related to updates of the inputs used in the valuation of the embedded derivatives associated with our living benefit features, the capital markets hedging activities resulted in a $193 million benefit in the first six months of 2009, reflecting a $1,788 million benefit related to the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives, partially offset by an $1,595 million charge related to the change in the fair value of the related hedge positions. This benefit was primarily driven by the out-performance of the underlying separate account funds relative to the performance of the market indices we utilize as a basis for developing our hedging strategy. The capital markets hedging activities for the first six months of 2008 resulted in a $46 million charge, reflecting a $118 million charge related to the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives, partially offset by a $72 million benefit related to the change in the fair value of the related hedge positions.

112

charge relating to reserve increases for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products. The adjustments for deferred policy acquisition and other costs in the first six months of 2009 reflect a reduction in amortization due to better than expected gross profits, resulting primarily from the favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features and better than expected lapse experience. The adjustment for the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products primarily reflects higher than expected actual contract guarantee claims costs in the first six months of 2009 due to lower than expected lapses, partially offset by higher than expected fee income.

The $24 million of benefits in the first six months of 2009 from the quarterly market performance adjustments referred to above include $66 million relating to releases of reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products, partially offset by charges of $42 million relating to increases to the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs. These market performance related adjustments largely reflect updates to our estimate of total gross profits for better than expected actual fund performance in the first six months of 2009. Included within the $42 million increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs is a $73 million charge to amortize the remaining balance of valuation of business acquired, or VOBA, related to the variable annuity contracts acquired from Allstate. The additional charge was required in the first quarter of 2009, as the declines in estimated future gross profits related to market performance caused the present value of estimated gross profits for these contracts to fall below zero. Since the VOBA balance was completely amortized for these contracts, it cannot be reestablished for market value appreciation in subsequent periods. Excluding this Allstate block of business, market value appreciation in the first six months of 2009 increased our estimates of total gross profits by establishing a new, higher starting point for the variable annuity account values used in estimating gross profits for future periods. The increase in our estimate of total gross profits results in a lower required rate of amortization, which is applied to all prior periods’ gross profits. The resulting cumulative adjustment to prior amortization is recognized in the current period.

Revenues

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $507 million, from $622 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $115 million in the second quarter of 2009. Policy charges and fees and asset management fees and other income decreased $587 million, including a $468 million unfavorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features, primarily driven by a reduction in our adjustment to the embedded derivative liabilities for market-perceived non-performance, as discussed above. In addition, fee income declined, driven by lower average variable annuity asset balances invested in separate accounts due to market depreciation over the twelve months ending June 30, 2009 and the transfer of balances to our general account relating to an automatic rebalancing element in some of our living benefit features. Partially offsetting these items, was a $77 million increase in net investment income, reflecting higher average annuity account values invested in our general account, also resulting from these transfers.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues increased $812 million, from $1,195 million in the first six months of 2008 to $2,007 million in the first six months of 2009. Policy charges and fees and asset management fees and other income increased $621 million, including a $890 million favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features, primarily driven by a market-perceived increase in our own risk of non-performance, as discussed above. This favorable variance was partially offset by a decrease in fee income driven by lower average variable annuity asset balances invested in separate accounts due to market depreciation over the twelve months ending June 30, 2009 and the transfer of balances to our general account relating to an automatic rebalancing element in some of our living benefit features. In addition, net investment income increased $190 million, reflecting higher average annuity account values invested in our general account, also resulting from these transfers.

113

Benefits and Expenses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $785 million, from a charge of $468 million in the second quarter of 2008 to a benefit of $317 million in the second quarter of 2009. Absent the impact of the $410 million benefit related to higher quarterly adjustments for current period experience and market performance and the $416 million decrease in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs due to the favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features discussed above, which account for $826 million of the decrease, benefits and expenses increased $41 million. On this basis, interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased $54 million primarily reflecting higher average annuity account values invested in our general account resulting from transfers relating to an automatic rebalancing element in some of our living benefit features. Also on this basis, policyholders’ benefits, including changes in reserves, increased $33 million primarily reflecting higher actual and expected contract guarantee claims costs related to the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products. Partially offsetting these increases was a $29 million decrease in general and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, absent the effect of the items mentioned above, and a $12 million decrease in interest expense. The decrease in general and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, on this basis, was driven by declines in distribution and asset management costs associated with lower variable annuity account values, and lower amortization of VOBA primarily reflecting the impact of lower gross profits due to the decrease in fee income. The decrease in interest expense reflects paydowns of inter-company debt, which were funded with affiliated capital contributions.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses increased $632 million, from $926 million in the first six months of 2008 to $1,558 million in the first six months of 2009. Absent the net impact of the $664 million increase in the amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs due to the favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with our living benefit features and the $98 million benefit related to higher quarterly adjustments for current period experience and market performance discussed above, which account for $566 million of the decrease, benefits and expenses increased $66 million. On this basis, interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased $113 million primarily reflecting higher average annuity account values invested in our general account, resulting from transfers relating to an automatic rebalancing element in some of our living benefit features. Also on this basis, policyholders’ benefits, including changes in reserves, increased $60 million primarily reflecting higher actual and expected contract guarantee claims costs related to the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products. Partially offsetting these increases was a $80 million decrease in general and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, absent the effect of the items mentioned above, and a $22 million decrease in interest expense. The decrease in general and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, on this basis, was driven by declines in distribution and asset management costs associated with lower variable annuity account values, and lower amortization of VOBA primarily reflecting the impact of lower gross profits due to the decrease in fee income. The decrease in interest expense reflects paydowns of inter-company debt, which were funded with affiliated capital contributions.

114

Account Values

The following table sets forth changes in account values for the individual annuity business, for the periods indicated. For our individual annuity business, assets are reported at account value, and net sales (redemptions) are gross sales minus redemptions or surrenders and withdrawals, as applicable.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Variable Annuities(1):
Beginning total account value	$	57,942		$	74,977		$	60,007		$	80,330
Sales		3,378			2,740			5,486			5,569
Surrenders and withdrawals		(1,315	)		(2,185	)		(2,758	)		(4,358	)

Net sales		2,063			555			2,728			1,211
Benefit payments		(236	)		(262	)		(492	)		(556	)

Net flows		1,827			293			2,236			655
Change in market value, interest credited and other activity		5,566			(246	)		3,297			(5,655	)
Policy charges		(236	)		(317	)		(441	)		(623	)

Ending total account value(2)	$	65,099		$	74,707		$	65,099		$	74,707

Fixed Annuities:
Beginning total account value	$	3,263		$	3,440		$	3,295		$	3,488
Sales		41			24			96			41
Surrenders and withdrawals		(75	)		(61	)		(152	)		(114	)

Net redemptions		(34	)		(37	)		(56	)		(73	)
Benefit payments		(37	)		(40	)		(80	)		(83	)

Net flows		(71	)		(77	)		(136	)		(156	)
Interest credited and other activity		30			31			63			63
Policy charges		(1	)		—			(1	)		(1	)

Ending total account value	$	3,221		$	3,394		$	3,221		$	3,394

(1)	Variable annuities include only those sold as retail investment products. Investments through defined contribution plan products are included with such products within the Retirement segment.

(2)	As of June 30, 2009, variable annuity account values are invested in equity funds ($21 billion or 32%), balanced funds ($17 billion or 26%), market value adjusted or fixed rate options ($13 billion or 20%), bond funds ($9 billion or 14%) and other ($5 billion or 8%).

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Total account values for fixed and variable annuities amounted to $68.3 billion as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $7.1 billion from March 31, 2009. The increase came primarily from increases in the market value of customers’ variable annuities due to equity market appreciation and, to a lesser extent, from positive variable annuity net flows. Total account values as of June 30, 2009 decreased $9.8 billion from June 30, 2008, primarily due to decreases in the market value of customers’ variable annuities due to significant equity market declines, partially offset by positive variable annuity net flows. Individual variable annuity gross sales increased by $638 million, from $2,740 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $3,378 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase reflects increased sales of our optional living benefit product features, which benefited from competitor product modifications to increase pricing and scale back product features. While we have announced similar modifications which we will begin offering in the third quarter of 2009, we believe our product offering including these modifications will still be competitively positioned in relation to our competitors going forward. Individual variable annuity surrenders and withdrawals decreased by $870 million, from $2,185 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $1,315 million in the second quarter of 2009, reflecting the overall impact of lower account values due to market depreciation and lower lapses for policies where the current policyholder account value is below the guaranteed minimum death or living benefit value.

115

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Total account values for fixed and variable annuities amounted to $68.3 billion as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $5.0 billion from December 31, 2008. The increase came primarily from increases in the market value of customers’ variable annuities due to equity market appreciation and from positive variable annuity net flows. Total account values as of June 30, 2009 decreased $9.8 billion from June 30, 2008, primarily due to decreases in the market value of customers’ variable annuities due to significant equity market declines, partially offset by positive variable annuity net flows. Individual variable annuity gross sales decreased by $83 million, from $5,569 million in the first six months of 2008 to $5,486 million in the first six months of 2009, reflecting the negative impact on sales of the market volatility and equity market decline experienced in the first quarter of 2009, partially offset by strong sales of our optional living benefit product features in the second quarter of 2009 as discussed above. Individual variable annuity surrenders and withdrawals decreased by $1.6 billion, from $4,358 million in the first six months of 2008 to $2,758 million in the first six months of 2009, reflecting the overall impact of lower account values due to market depreciation and lower lapses for policies where the current policyholder account value is below the guaranteed minimum death or living benefit value.

Variable Annuity Net Amount at Risk

As a result of the volatility and disruption in the global financial markets, in recent periods we have seen significant increases in the net amount at risk for our variable annuity products with riders that include optional living and guaranteed minimum death benefit features. The net amount at risk is generally defined as the present value of the guaranteed minimum benefit amount in excess of the contractholder’s current account balance. Variable annuity account values with living benefit features were $38.7 billion, $33.1 billion and $37.1 billion as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. We segregate our variable annuity living benefit features into four broad product groupings based on our risk management strategies. The following table sets forth the account value and net amount at risk of our variable annuities with living benefit features based on these product grouping, as of the dates indicated.


Risk Management Strategy:	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008				June 30, 2008
Risk Management Strategy:	Account Value		Net Amount at Risk		Account Value		Net Amount at Risk		Account Value		Net Amount at Risk
	(in millions)
Automatic rebalancing element and capital markets hedging	$	15,309	$	1,245	$	9,655	$	1,071	$	6,833	$	400
Automatic rebalancing element only		7,626		5		7,998		257		9,057		1
Capital markets hedging only		11,577		2,642		11,287		3,097		15,251		607
No automatic rebalancing element or capital markets hedging		4,184		1,644		4,114		1,876		5,958		759

Total variable annuity account values with living benefit features	$	38,696	$	5,536	$	33,054	$	6,301	$	37,099	$	1,767

The automatic rebalancing element included in the design of certain variable annuity products transfers assets between contractholder sub-accounts depending on a number of factors, including the investment performance of the sub-accounts. Negative investment performance may result in transfers, depending on the product, to either a fixed general account option or a separate account bond portfolio. In certain situations, assets may transfer back when investment performance improves. The automatic rebalancing element is designed to limit our exposure to equity market risk and market volatility. Our latest offerings of optional living benefit features associated with variable annuity products all include an automatic rebalancing element, and we have discontinued the sale of optional living benefit features without an automatic rebalancing element. As of June 30, 2009 approximately 59% of variable annuity account values with living benefit features included an automatic rebalancing element in the product design, compared to 53% and 43% as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. As of June 30, 2009 approximately 23% of the net amount at risk associated with variable annuity account values with living benefit features included an automatic rebalancing element in the product

116

design, compared to 21% and 23% as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. In our capital markets hedging program we purchase equity options and futures as well as interest rate derivatives to hedge certain guarantees for changes in equity markets, interest rates, and market volatility. In the second quarter of 2009, we began the expansion of our hedging program to include a portion of our market exposures related to guaranteed minimum death and income benefits, which risks we previously retained. While the expansion of our hedging program did not have a material impact on our results in the second quarter of 2009, we will continue to assess the expansion of the hedging program over the next several quarters.

Our guaranteed minimum death benefits guarantee a minimum return on the contract value or an enhanced value, if applicable, to be used for purposes of determining benefits payable in the event of death. All of the $38.7 billion, $33.1 billion and $37.1 billion of variable annuity account values with living benefit features as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively, also contain guaranteed minimum death benefits. An additional $22.8 billion, $23.3 billion and $32.9 billion of variable annuity account values, respectively, contain guaranteed minimum death benefits, but no living benefit features. The following table sets forth the account value and net amount at risk of our variable annuities with guaranteed minimum death benefits split between those that include an automatic rebalancing element and those that do not, as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008				June 30, 2008
Risk Management Strategy:	Account Value		Net Amount at Risk		Account Value		Net Amount at Risk		Account Value		Net Amount at Risk
	(in millions)
Automatic rebalancing element	$	22,850	$	1,328	$	17,653	$	1,698	$	15,889	$	535
No automatic rebalancing		38,632		12,248		38,733		14,404		54,100		5,247

Total variable annuity account values with guaranteed minimum death benefits	$	61,482	$	13,576	$	56,386	$	16,102	$	69,989	$	5,782

As of June 30, 2009 approximately 37% of variable annuity account values with guaranteed minimum death benefits included an automatic rebalancing element in the product design, compared to 31% and 23% as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. As of June 30, 2009 approximately 10% of the net amount at risk associated with variable annuity account values with guaranteed minimum death benefits included an automatic rebalancing element in the product design, compared to 11% and 9% as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively.

117

Retirement

Operating Results

The following table sets forth the Retirement segment’s operating results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Operating results:
Revenues	$	1,230		$	1,207		$	2,438		$	2,474
Benefits and expenses		1,131			1,066			2,180			2,209

Adjusted operating income		99			141			258			265
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(1)		(401	)		(256	)		(719	)		(435	)
Related charges(2)		5			(1	)		6			(4	)
Investment gains (losses) on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, net(3)		575			(168	)		772			(273	)
Change in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes(4)		(236	)		139			(333	)		182

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	42		$	(145	)	$	(16	)	$	(265	)

(1)	Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

(2)	Benefits and expenses exclude related charges which represent the unfavorable (favorable) impact of Realized investment gains (losses), net, on change in reserves and the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.

(3)	Revenues exclude net investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities. See “—Investment Gains and Losses on Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities and Changes in Experience-Rated Contractholder Liabilities Due to Asset Value Changes.”

(4)

Benefits and expenses exclude changes in contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes in the pool of investments supporting these experience-rated contracts. See “—Investment Gains and Losses on Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities and Changes in Experience-Rated Contractholder Liabilities Due to Asset Value Changes.”

On October 10, 2008, we acquired MullinTBG Insurance Agency Services, LLC and related entities, or MullinTBG, a provider of executive benefit solutions and financing strategies, including nonqualified executive deferred compensation plans. The acquisition included $8.9 billion of nonqualified full service retirement account values that we administer, which are not reported on our balance sheet.

Adjusted Operating Income

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income for the Retirement segment decreased $42 million, from $141 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $99 million in the second quarter of 2009, reflecting a decrease in adjusted operating income for both our full service business and our institutional investment products business. The decline in our full service business was primarily driven by lower asset management fees, due to a decrease in average full service fee-based retirement account values primarily resulting from equity market depreciation. Also contributing to the decline was a $13 million unfavorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and derivative hedge positions related to the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits associated with certain defined contribution accounts. This unfavorable variance is primarily driven by a reduction in our adjustment to reflect our market perceived non-performance risk in the fair value of the embedded derivative. For additional information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with these guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits, including the inputs for non-performance risk, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and

118

Liabilities—Valuation of Variable Annuity Optional Living Benefit Features.” Partially offsetting these declines in our full service business was an increase in investment results driven by higher average invested assets in our general account due to full service participant transfers from our equity based separate account products to our general account stable value products, as well as higher net yields due to the impact of lower crediting rates on general account liabilities, resulting from rate resets. Substantially all of our stable value general account products are either fully or partially participating, and we have the ability to reset crediting rates annually or semi-annually giving effect to previous investment experience. The decrease in our institutional investment products business was driven by a decline in investment results and a lower benefit from reserve releases due to less favorable case experience related to our group annuity blocks of business. The decline in investment results was primarily due to lower net yields, including the impact of a higher balance of investments in lower yielding assets, such as cash and short-term investments, for liquidity purposes. Higher levels of short-term liquidity are being maintained to provide additional capability to address changing cash needs during the current market conditions.

We have not evaluated the goodwill of the Retirement segment’s full service business for impairment as of June 30, 2009, as no events occurred or circumstances changed during the second quarter of 2009 that would have more likely than not reduced the fair value of this business below its carrying amount. The carrying value of the Retirement segment’s full service business goodwill was $444 million as of June 30, 2009. Market declines or other events impacting the fair value of this business, or increases in the level of equity required to support this business from what we had assumed, could result in an impairment of some or all of the goodwill associated with this business in future periods, resulting in a charge to “General and administrative expenses.”

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income for the Retirement segment decreased $7 million, from $265 million in the first six months of 2008 to $258 million in the first six months of 2009, reflecting a decrease in adjusted operating income for our full service business, partially offset by higher results in our institutional investment products business. The decline in our full service business was primarily driven by lower asset management fees, due to a decrease in average full service fee-based retirement account values primarily resulting from equity market depreciation. Partially offsetting the decline in our full service business was an increase in investment results, driven by higher average invested assets in our general account due to full service participant transfers from our equity based separate account products to our general account stable value products, as well as higher net yields due to the impact of lower crediting rates on general account liabilities, resulting from rate resets. The increase in our institutional investment products business was driven by a greater benefit from reserve releases, including reserve refinements primarily reflecting updates of client census data, and improved investment results. The increase in investment results was primarily due to the impact of the scheduled maturity of a single large guaranteed investment contract which had an interest crediting rate in excess of our general account invested asset yield, partially offset by lower yields, including the impact of a higher balance of investments in lower yielding assets, such as cash and short-term investments, for liquidity purposes, as discussed above.

Revenues

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” increased $23 million, from $1,207 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $1,230 million in the second quarter of 2009. Premiums increased $107 million, driven by higher life-contingent structured settlement sales, and resulted in a corresponding increase in policyholders’ benefits, including the change in policy reserves, as discussed below. Partially offsetting this increase was a $54 million decline in net investment income, primarily reflecting lower portfolio yields, including lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets and the impact of a higher balance of investments in lower yielding assets, such as cash and short-term investments, for liquidity purposes, as discussed above. A larger base of invested assets, primarily driven by participant transfers from our equity based separate account products to our general account stable value products in our full service business, served as a partial offset to the decline in net investment income. Policy charges and fee income and asset management fees and other income decreased $30 million, primarily relating to a decline in

119

asset management fees driven by a decrease in average full service fee-based retirement account values primarily resulting from equity market depreciation, as well as full service participant transfers from our equity based separate account products to our general account stable value products. The $13 million unfavorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and derivative hedge positions related to the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits associated with certain defined contribution accounts discussed above, also contributed to the decline. Partially offsetting these declines in policy charges and fee income and asset management fees and other income was $8 million of revenues in the second quarter of 2009 associated with the acquired operations of MullinTBG.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues decreased $36 million, from $2,474 million in the first six months of 2008 to $2,438 million in the first six months of 2009. Net investment income decreased $86 million, primarily reflecting lower portfolio yields, including lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets and the impact of a higher balance of investments in lower yielding assets, such as cash and short-term investments, for liquidity purposes, as discussed above. A larger base of invested assets, primarily driven by participant transfers from our equity based separate account products to our general account stable value products in our full service business, served as a partial offset to the decline in net investment income. Policy charges and fee income and asset management fees and other income decreased $15 million, primarily relating to a decline in asset management fees driven by a decrease in average full service fee-based retirement account values primarily resulting from equity market depreciation, as well as full service participant transfers from our equity based separate account products to our general account stable value products. Partially offsetting the decline in asset management fees was $20 million of revenues in the first six months of 2009 associated with the acquired operations of MullinTBG. Also serving as a partial offset was a $14 million favorable variance in the mark-to-market of embedded derivatives and derivative hedge positions related to the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits associated with certain defined contribution accounts. This favorable variance was primarily driven by a benefit related to an update of the inputs used in the valuation of the embedded derivative to incorporate a spread over LIBOR, reflecting a market-perceived increase in our own risk of non-performance. For additional information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with these guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits, including the inputs for non-performance risk, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Variable Annuity Optional Living Benefit Features.” Premiums increased $65 million, driven by higher life-contingent structured settlement sales, partially offset by lower single premium group annuity sales, and resulted in a corresponding increase in policyholders’ benefits, including the change in policy reserves, as discussed below.

Benefits and Expenses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” increased $65 million, from $1,066 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $1,131 million in the second quarter of 2009. Policyholders’ benefits, including the change in policy reserves, increased $96 million, primarily reflecting the increase in premiums discussed above, as well as less favorable case experience related to our group annuity blocks of business, partially offset by lower interest on lower general account policy reserves. In addition, general and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, increased $25 million, driven by expenses incurred to support several large client sales as well as $12 million of costs related to the acquired operations of MullinTBG, partially offset by the absence of costs related to an interim service agreement relating to the retirement business acquired from Union Bank of California, N.A., which were included in the second quarter of 2008. Partially offsetting these items was a $39 million decrease in interest credited to policyholders’ account balances, primarily reflecting lower crediting rates on floating rate guaranteed investment products and lower crediting rates on full service stable value product liabilities due to rate resets, partially offset by the impact of higher full service general account stable value product account values from participant transfers from equity based separate account products. Interest expense decreased $13 million, reflecting lower interest rates on lower borrowings used to support investments.

120

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses decreased $29 million, from $2,209 million in the first six months of 2008 to $2,180 million in the first six months of 2009. Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances decreased $84 million, primarily reflecting lower crediting rates on floating rate guaranteed investment products and lower crediting rates on full service stable value product liabilities due to rate resets, partially offset by the impact of higher full service general account stable value product account values from participant transfers from equity based separate account products. In addition, interest expense decreased $31 million, reflecting lower interest rates on borrowings used to support investments. Partially offsetting these decreases, policyholders’ benefits, including the change in policy reserves, increased $42 million, primarily reflecting the increase in premiums discussed above, partially offset by an increased benefit from reserve releases, including reserve refinements primarily reflecting updates of client census data, and lower interest on lower general account policy reserves. General and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, increased $41 million, driven by expenses incurred to support several large client sales as well as $26 million of costs related to the acquired operations of MullinTBG, partially offset by the absence of costs related to an interim service agreement relating to the retirement business acquired from Union Bank of California, N.A., which were included in the first six months of 2008.

Sales Results and Account Values

The following table shows the changes in the account values and net additions (withdrawals) of Retirement segment products for the periods indicated. Net additions (withdrawals) are deposits and sales or additions, as applicable, minus withdrawals and benefits. These concepts do not correspond to revenues under U.S. GAAP, but are used as a relevant measure of business activity.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Full Service(1):
Beginning total account value	$	102,159		$	107,060		$	99,738		$	112,192
Deposits and sales		3,890			4,530			14,379			9,116
Withdrawals and benefits		(3,803	)		(4,366	)		(8,034	)		(8,299	)
Change in market value, interest credited and interest income		8,704			(307	)		4,867			(6,092	)

Ending total account value	$	110,950		$	106,917		$	110,950		$	106,917

Net additions (withdrawals)	$	87		$	164		$	6,345		$	817

Institutional Investment Products(2):
Beginning total account value	$	49,030		$	51,667		$	50,491		$	51,591
Additions(3)		2,343			1,606			2,970			3,416
Withdrawals and benefits		(1,272	)		(1,944	)		(3,309	)		(3,646	)
Change in market value, interest credited and interest income		678			241			526			802
Other(4)		(1,304	)		(57	)		(1,203	)		(650	)

Ending total account value	$	49,475		$	51,513		$	49,475		$	51,513

Net additions (withdrawals)	$	1,071		$	(338	)	$	(339	)	$	(230	)

(1)	Ending total account value for the full service business includes assets of Prudential’s retirement plan of $4.9 billion and $5.4 billion as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)

Ending total account value for the institutional investment products business includes assets of Prudential’s retirement plan of $4.9 billion and $5.2 billion as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Ending total account value for the institutional investments products business also includes $1.5 billion as of June 30, 2009 related to collateralized funding agreements issued to the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (FHLBNY), and $1.9 billion and $3.4 billion as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to affiliated funding agreements issued using the proceeds from the sale of Prudential Financial retail medium-term notes. For additional information regarding the FHLBNY and the retail medium-term notes program see, “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

121

(3)	Additions includes $500 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 representing transfers of externally managed client balances to accounts we manage. This addition is offset within Other, as there was no net impact on ending account values for this transfer.

(4)

Other includes transfers from (to) the Asset Management segment of $115 million and $(91) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. Other also includes $(500) million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, representing transfers of externally managed client balances to accounts we manage. This addition is offset within Additions, as there was no net impact on ending account values for this transfer. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, Other also includes $1,500 million representing collateralized funding agreements issued to the FHLBNY and for the three and six months ending June 30, 2009 includes $(507) million and $(1,522) million, respectively, representing terminations of affiliated funding agreements utilizing proceeds from the issuances to FHLBNY. Remaining amounts for all periods presented primarily represent changes in asset balances for externally-managed accounts.

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Account values in our full service business amounted to $111.0 billion as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $8.8 billion from March 31, 2009. The increase in account values was primarily driven by an increase in the market value of customer funds due to equity market appreciation. Account values in our full service business as of June 30, 2009 increased $4.0 billion from June 30, 2008, driven by $9.4 billion of net additions for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, as well as the addition of $8.9 billion of account values related to the acquisition of MullinTBG, partially offset by a decrease in the market value of customer funds due to significant declines in the equity markets. Net additions decreased $77 million, from $164 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $87 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting lower new plan sales, partially offset by lower plan lapses. Plan lapses in the second quarter of 2008 included $844 million of lapses relating to account values acquired from Union Bank of California, N.A. These lapses occurred during the final stages of the conversion of acquired account values to our systems platform, which was completed in the second quarter of 2008.

Account values in our institutional investment products business amounted to $49.5 billion as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $445 million from March 31, 2009, primarily reflecting net additions of $1.071 billion, driven by sales of our structured settlement and guaranteed investment products in the institutional markets, partially offset by net outflows from externally managed accounts. Account values in our institutional investment products business as of June 30, 2009 decreased $2.038 billion from June 30, 2008, primarily reflecting net withdrawals of $1.8 billion for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, driven by the impact of scheduled withdrawals of our guaranteed investment products, as well as net outflows from externally managed accounts. Net additions (withdrawals) increased $1.409 billion, from net withdrawals of $338 million in the second quarter of 2008 to net additions of $1.071 billion in the second quarter of 2009. This increase reflects the impact of both higher additions and lower scheduled withdrawals of our guaranteed investment products. Sales of our retail notes and institutional notes have been negatively impacted by unfavorable capital markets conditions, in particular during the second half of 2008 and into the second quarter of 2009, as the stress experienced by global financial markets that began in the second half of 2007 continued. Rating agency downgrades to the claims-paying ratings of our insurance subsidiaries in the first quarter of 2009 could also have an adverse impact on sales of our guaranteed investment products in future periods.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Account values in our full service business amounted to $111.0 billion as of June 30, 2009, an increase of $11.2 billion from December 31, 2008. The increase in account values was driven by both net additions of $6.3 billion and an increase in the market value of customer funds due to equity market appreciation. Account values in our full service business as of June 30, 2009 increased $4.0 billion from June 30, 2008, driven by $9.4 billion of net additions for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, as well as the addition of $8.9 billion of account values related to the acquisition of MullinTBG, partially offset by a decrease in the market value of customer funds due to significant declines in the equity markets. Net additions increased $5.5 billion, from $817 million in the first six months of 2008 to $6.3 billion in the first six months of 2009, primarily reflecting higher new plan sales. New plan sales in the first six months of 2009 included a concentration of large client sales, including eight client sales over $100 million, totaling $5.8 billion, compared to five client sales over $100 million in the first six months of 2008, which totaled $1.4 billion.

Account values in our institutional investment products business amounted to $49.5 billion as of June 30, 2009, a decrease of $1.016 billion from December 31, 2008, reflecting net withdrawals of $338 million, driven

122

by the impact of scheduled withdrawals of our guaranteed investment products, as well as net outflows from externally managed accounts. Account values in our institutional investment products business as of June 30, 2009 decreased $2.038 billion from June 30, 2008, primarily reflecting net withdrawals of $1.8 billion for the twelve months ended June 30, 2009, driven by the impact of scheduled withdrawals of our guaranteed investment products, as well as net outflows from externally managed accounts. Net withdrawals increased $109 million, from $230 million in the first six months of 2008 to $339 million in the first six months of 2009. This increase reflects the impact of lower sales of our guaranteed investment products, as discussed above.

Asset Management

Operating Results

The following table sets forth the Asset Management segment’s operating results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Operating results:
Revenues	$	342		$	564		$	605		$	1,112
Benefits and expenses		309			374			573			803

Adjusted operating income		33			190			32			309
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(1)		(19	)		(10	)		(25	)		2
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests(2)		15			8			4			26

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	29		$	188		$	11		$	337

(1)	Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

(2)

Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures are included in adjusted operating income but excluded from income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis on an after-tax basis as a separate line in our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are excluded from adjusted operating income but included in income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis as a separate line in our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests represent the portion of earnings from consolidated entities that relate to the equity interests of minority investors.

Adjusted Operating Income

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $157 million, from $190 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $33 million in the second quarter of 2009. Results of the segment’s proprietary investing activities decreased $90 million primarily reflecting lower proprietary investing balances during the current period, and, to a lesser extent, lower returns on real estate investments. Investment results in a fixed income fund included income of $42 million in the second quarter of 2008, compared to income of $5 million in the second quarter of 2009. Our entire investment in the fixed income fund was redeemed as of June 30, 2009. Proprietary investing results for equity investments declined $28 million reflecting the exit of several equity investment funds in 2009. Real estate proprietary investing decreased $26 million, reflecting the impact of lower real estate values on co-investments and other seed investments.

Also contributing to the decrease in adjusted operating income was a decline of $48 million in the segment’s commercial mortgage origination and servicing activities driven by an increase in interim loan loss reserves. Due

123

to current market conditions and the inherent risk of these loans, the underwriting of new interim loans has been suspended. As of June 30, 2009, the principal balance of interim loans outstanding totaled $1.8 billion, which excludes $141 million of future fundings related to these loans that would need to be disbursed if the borrowers met the conditions for these fundings. As of June 30, 2009, these interim loans outstanding had a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 109%, indicating that, in aggregate, the loan amount is greater than the collateral value, and a weighted average debt service coverage ratio of 1.26 times. A stabilized value and projected net operating income are used in the calculation of the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios. These loans also had an allowance for losses or credit related market value losses totaling $150 million. Results in the second quarter of 2009 also reflect a decrease in asset management fees primarily from retail and institutional customer assets as a result of decreased asset values due to market depreciation, which more than offset net inflows of institutional and retail funds, in addition to lower transaction fees related to our real estate investment management activities. In addition, results for the second quarter of 2009 reflect lower income related to mutual fund service fees and securities lending activities. These declines were partially offset by a decrease in compensation costs.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $277 million, from $309 million in the first six months of 2008 to $32 million in the first six months of 2009. Results of the segment’s proprietary investing activities decreased $105 million primarily reflecting lower returns on real estate investments, as well as lower proprietary investing balances during the current period. Real estate proprietary investing decreased $72 million reflecting the impact of lower real estate values on co-investments. Investment results in the fixed income fund included income of $8 million in the first six months of 2008, compared to losses of $11 million in the first six months of 2009. Our entire investment in the fixed income fund was redeemed as of June 30, 2009. Proprietary investing results for equity investments declined $16 million reflecting the exit of several equity investment funds in 2009. In addition, the segment’s commercial mortgage origination and servicing activities decreased $51 million primarily driven by an increase in interim loan loss reserves. Results in 2009 also reflect a decrease in asset management fees primarily from retail and institutional customer assets as a result of decreased asset values due to market depreciation, as well as lower transaction and performance based incentive fees, primarily related to institutional real estate funds reflecting a decline in real estate values. In addition, results for the first six months of 2009 reflect lower income related to mutual fund service fees and securities lending activities. These declines were partially offset by a decrease in compensation costs.

124

Revenues

The following tables set forth the Asset Management segment’s revenues, presented on a basis consistent with the table above under “—Operating Results,” by type, asset management fees by source and assets under management for the periods indicated. In managing our business we analyze assets under management, which do not correspond to U.S. GAAP assets, because a principal source of our revenues are fees based on assets under management.


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
	(in millions)
Revenues by type:
Asset management fees by source:
Institutional customers	$	126		$	136	$	245		$	269
Retail customers(1)		62			85		118			166
General account		66			67		130			134

Total asset management fees	$	254		$	288	$	493		$	569

Incentive fees		14			10		(3	)		82
Transaction fees		9			31		12			46
Proprietary investing		(13	)		86		(43	)		82
Commercial mortgage(2)		(22	)		25		(13	)		30

Total incentive, transaction, proprietary investing and commercial mortgage revenues		(12	)		152		(47	)		240

Service, distribution and other revenues(3)		100			124		159			303

Total revenues	$	342		$	564	$	605		$	1,112

(1)

Consists of individual mutual funds and both variable annuities and variable life insurance asset management revenues from our separate accounts. This also includes funds invested in proprietary mutual funds through our defined contribution plan products. Revenues from fixed annuities and the fixed rate options of both variable annuities and variable life insurance are included in the general account.

(2)	Includes mortgage origination and spread lending revenues of our commercial mortgage origination and servicing business.

(3)

Includes payments from Wachovia Corporation under an agreement dated as of July 30, 2004 implementing arrangements with respect to money market mutual funds in connection with the combination of our retail securities brokerage and clearing operations with those of Wachovia Corporation. The agreement extends for ten years after termination of the joint venture. The revenue from Wachovia Corporation under this agreement was $16 million and $14 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $30 million and $28 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.


	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
	(in billions)
Assets Under Management (at fair market value):
Institutional customers(1)	$	163.5	$	179.3
Retail customers(2)		70.3		84.6
General account		175.6		175.0

Total	$	409.4	$	438.9

(1)	Consists of third party institutional assets and group insurance contracts.

(2)

Consists of individual mutual funds and both variable annuities and variable life insurance assets in our separate accounts. This also includes funds invested in proprietary mutual funds through our defined contribution plan products. Fixed annuities and the fixed rate options of both variable annuities and variable life insurance are included in the general account.

125

The following table sets forth the proprietary investments of the Asset Management segment at fair market value (including the value of derivative instruments used to mitigate equity market and currency risk) by asset class and source as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
	(in millions)
Co-Investments:
Real Estate	$	300	$	228
Fixed Income		2		492
Seed Investments:
Real Estate		166		497
Public Equity		55		462
Fixed Income		31		53
Loans Secured by Investor Equity Commitments or Fund Assets:
Real Estate secured by Investor Equity		38		835
Real Estate secured by Fund Assets		338		154

Total	$	930	$	2,721

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $222 million, from $564 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $342 million in the second quarter of 2009. Revenues from proprietary investing decreased $99 million primarily reflecting lower proprietary investing balances during the current period, driven by lower investment results in a fixed income fund, and the exiting of several equity fund investments in 2009. The decrease in proprietary investing revenues also reflected lower real estate proprietary investing, primarily from lower real estate values on co-investments and other seed investments. Commercial mortgage revenues decreased $47 million primarily as a result of additional interim loan loss reserves in the second quarter of 2009. Asset management fees decreased $34 million, primarily from the management of retail and institutional customer assets as a result of lower asset values due to market depreciation. Service, distribution and other revenues decreased $24 million primarily due to lower mutual fund service fees and assets under management, with a corresponding decrease in expense, as well as revenues related to securities lending activities. Also contributing to the decrease were lower revenues in certain consolidated real estate funds, which were fully offset by lower expenses related to noncontrolling interests in these funds.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues decreased $507 million, from $1.112 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $605 million in the first six months of 2009. Service, distribution and other revenues decreased $144 million primarily related to lower revenues in certain consolidated real estate funds, which were fully offset by lower expenses related to noncontrolling interests in these funds. In addition, service fee revenues declined primarily due to a change in the service fee arrangement with Wachovia Securities and lower assets under management, with a corresponding decrease in expense. The remainder of the decrease in service, distribution and other revenues includes lower mutual fund service fee revenues, as well as a decline in revenues related to securities lending activities. Revenues from proprietary investing decreased $125 million reflecting lower returns on real estate investments, as well as lower proprietary investing balances during the current period. Real estate proprietary investing revenues decreased primarily due to the impact of lower real estate values on co-investments. The decrease in proprietary investing revenues also reflected lower investment results in a fixed income fund and the exiting of several equity investment funds in 2009. In addition, incentive fees decreased $85 million primarily related to institutional real estate funds as a result of adverse real estate market conditions. A portion of these incentive based fees are offset in incentive compensation expense in accordance with the terms of the contractual agreements. Certain of our incentive fees continue to be subject to positive or negative future adjustment based on cumulative fund performance in relation to specified benchmarks. As of June 30, 2009, $133 million of cumulative incentive fee revenue, net of compensation, is subject to future adjustment, compared to $123 million as of December 31, 2008. In the first six months of 2009, adjustments of

126

$25 million related to previously recognized incentive fees contributed to the decline in incentive fees resulting from fund performance. Asset management fees decreased $76 million, primarily from the management of retail and institutional customer assets as a result of lower asset values due to market depreciation. Commercial mortgage revenues decreased $43 million as a result of additional interim loan loss reserves in the first six months of 2009, as discussed above.

Expenses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $65 million, from $374 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $309 million in the second quarter of 2009, driven by compensation costs primarily due to lower incentive compensation as a result of lower revenues, as well as lower headcount. In addition, expenses related to the decline in mutual fund service fee revenue and revenues associated with certain real estate funds decreased, as discussed above.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Expenses decreased $230 million, from $803 million in the first six months of 2008 to $573 million in the first six months of 2009, driven by lower expenses related to the decline in mutual fund service fee revenue, incentive based fees, and revenues associated with certain real estate funds, as discussed above. In addition, compensation costs decreased primarily due to lower incentive compensation as a result of lower revenues, as well as lower headcount.

U.S. Individual Life and Group Insurance Division

Individual Life

Operating Results

The following table sets forth the Individual Life segment’s operating results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
	(in millions)
Operating results:
Revenues	$	703	$	676	$	1,383	$	1,356
Benefits and expenses		565		573		1,205		1,157

Adjusted operating income		138		103		178		199
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(1)		63		66		32		(70	)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	201	$	169	$	210	$	129

(1)	Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

Adjusted Operating Income

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $35 million, from $103 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $138 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in adjusted operating income reflects a net decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of related amortization of unearned revenue reserves relating to current quarter experience, primarily reflecting the impact of more favorable equity markets on separate account fund performance, which was partially offset by an increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of related amortization of unearned revenue reserves reflecting the impact of unfavorable equity markets in late 2008 and early 2009 on variable product

127

policy persistency. Favorable mortality experience, net of reinsurance, in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008 also contributed to the increase in adjusted operating income. The current quarter also benefited from higher earnings from growth in term and universal life insurance in force. Partially offsetting these items was a decrease in asset based fees due to lower separate account asset balances in comparison to the prior year quarter, reflecting the impact of the unfavorable equity markets in late 2008 and early 2009.

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of related amortization of unearned revenue reserves includes the impact of actual market performance on both actual profits and estimated future gross profits, used as the basis for amortizing deferred policy acquisition costs. We continue to derive our future rate of return assumptions using a reversion to the mean approach, a common industry practice. Under this approach, we consider actual returns over a period of time and initially adjust future projected returns over a four year period so that the assets grow at the long-term expected rate of return for the entire period. However, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing through the second quarter of 2009, the projected future rate of return calculated using the reversion to the mean approach was greater than 10.9%, our current maximum future rate of return assumption across all asset types for this business. As a result, we utilized the maximum future rate of return over the four year period, thereby limiting the impact of the reversion to the mean on our estimate of total gross profits.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $21 million, from $199 million in the first six months of 2008 to $178 million in the first six months of 2009. The decrease in adjusted operating income reflects a decrease in asset based fees due to lower separate account asset balances reflecting the impact of the unfavorable equity markets in late 2008 and early 2009. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of related amortization of unearned revenue reserves, was slightly higher than the prior year as an increase in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of related amortization of unearned revenue reserves reflecting the impact of unfavorable equity markets in late 2008 and early 2009 on variable product policy persistency was mostly offset by a decrease in amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of related amortization of unearned revenue reserves relating to current quarter experience, primarily reflecting the impact of more favorable equity markets on separate account fund performance. Results in 2009 also reflect higher earnings from growth in term and universal life insurance in force, partially offset by losses on an investment in a real property separate account fund.

Revenues

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” increased $27 million, from $676 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $703 million in the second quarter of 2009. Premiums increased $22 million, primarily due to increased premiums on term life insurance reflecting continued growth of our in force block of term insurance. Net investment income increased $18 million, reflecting higher asset balances primarily from the financing of regulatory requirements associated with statutory reserves for certain term and universal life insurance policies and growth in universal life account balances due to increased policyholder deposits. Policy charges and fees and asset management fees and other

128

income decreased $13 million, primarily reflecting lower asset based fees due to lower separate account asset balances reflecting the unfavorable impact of equity market performance in late 2008 and early 2009.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues increased $27 million, from $1,356 million in the first six months of 2008 to $1,383 million in the first six months of 2009. Premiums increased $34 million, primarily due to increased premiums on term life insurance reflecting continued growth of our in force block of term insurance. Net investment income increased $35 million, reflecting higher asset balances primarily from the financing of regulatory requirements associated with statutory reserves for certain term and universal life insurance policies and growth in universal life account balances due to increased policyholder deposits, partially offset by losses on an investment in a real property separate account fund. Policy charges and fees and asset management fees and other income decreased $42 million, primarily reflecting lower asset based fees due to lower separate account asset balances reflecting the unfavorable impact of equity market performance in late 2008 and early 2009.

Benefits and Expenses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $8 million, from $573 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $565 million in the second quarter of 2009. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased $14 million, primarily reflecting the impact of more favorable equity markets on separate account fund performance partially offset by an increase in amortization reflecting the impact of unfavorable equity markets in late 2008 and early 2009 on variable product policy persistency. Policyholders’ benefits, including interest credited to policyholders’ account balances, increased $6 million, reflecting higher policyholder reserves from growth in our in force block of term insurance and an increase in interest credited to policyholders’ account balances due to growth in universal life account balances from increased policyholder deposits, partially offset by lower death claim costs.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses increased $48 million, from $1,157 million in the first six months of 2008 to $1,205 million in the first six months of 2009. Policyholders’ benefits, including interest credited to policyholders’ account balances, increased $43 million, reflecting an expected level of higher death claim costs and policyholder reserves associated with growth in our in force block of term insurance and an increase in interest credited to policyholders’ account balances due to growth in universal life account balances from increased policyholder deposits. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $3 million, primarily reflecting the impact of unfavorable equity markets in late 2008 and early 2009 on variable product policy persistency, which was partially offset by a decrease in amortization primarily reflecting the impact of more favorable equity markets in the second quarter of 2009 on separate account fund performance.

129

Sales Results

The following table sets forth individual life insurance annualized new business premiums for the periods indicated. In managing our individual life insurance business, we analyze annualized new business premiums, which do not correspond to revenues under U.S. GAAP, because annualized new business premiums measure the current sales performance of the business, while revenues primarily reflect the renewal persistency and aging of in force policies written in prior years and net investment income, in addition to current sales. Annualized new business premiums include 10% of first year excess premiums and deposits.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
	(in millions)
Annualized New Business Premiums(1):
Excluding corporate-owned life insurance:
Variable life	$	5	$	10	$	9	$	21
Universal life		32		22		60		39
Term life		61		52		113		103

Total excluding corporate-owned life insurance		98		84		182		163
Corporate-owned life insurance		—		—		—		—

Total	$	98	$	84	$	182	$	163

Annualized new business premiums by distribution channel, excluding corporate-owned life insurance(1):
Prudential Agents	$	24	$	29	$	46	$	57
Third party		74		55		136		106

Total	$	98	$	84	$	182	$	163

(1)

The Individual Life sales measure was modified in the fourth quarter of 2008 to reflect annualized new business premiums, which represent annualized scheduled premiums plus 10% of excess (unscheduled) and single premiums from new sales. This new measure provides a more meaningful presentation of sales results and trends than the former measure, which included 100% of excess (unscheduled) or single premiums. Prior period amounts have been restated to conform to the current presentation.

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Sales of new life insurance, measured as described above, increased $14 million, from $84 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $98 million in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in sales is primarily due to a $10 million increase in sales of universal life products and a $9 million increase in term life product sales by the third party distribution channel, partially offset by a $5 million decrease in sales of variable life products by Prudential Agents. Sales from the third party distribution channel were $19 million higher than the prior year quarter due to higher sales of universal life products reflecting the impact of product repricing in the second half of 2008 as well as higher sales of term life products reflecting market disruptions for some of our competitors. In the second quarter of 2009, we increased universal life and term life prices, which could impact future sales. Sales by Prudential Agents were $5 million lower than the prior year quarter primarily due to lower sales of variable life products which were impacted by the unfavorable market conditions experienced in late 2008 and early 2009. The number of Prudential Agents decreased slightly from 2,446 at June 30, 2008 to 2,421 at June 30, 2009.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Sales of new life insurance, measured as described above, increased $19 million, from $163 million in the first six months of 2008 to $182 million in the first six months of 2009. The increase in sales is primarily due to a $21 million increase in sales of universal life products and a $10 million increase in term life product sales primarily by the third party distribution channel, partially offset by a $12 million decrease in sales of variable life products by Prudential Agents. Sales from the third party distribution channel were $30 million higher than the first six months of 2008 due to higher sales of universal life products reflecting the impact of product repricing in the second half of 2008. Sales by Prudential Agents were

130

$11 million lower than the first six months of 2008 primarily due to lower sales of variable life products which were impacted by the unfavorable market conditions experienced in late 2008 and early 2009. The number of Prudential Agents decreased from 2,446 at June 30, 2008 to 2,421 at June 30, 2009.

Policy Surrender Experience

The following table sets forth the individual life insurance business’ policy surrender experience for variable and universal life insurance, measured by cash value of surrenders, for the periods indicated. These amounts do not correspond to expenses under U.S. GAAP. In managing this business, we analyze the cash value of surrenders because it is a measure of the degree to which policyholders are maintaining their in force business with us, a driver of future profitability. Generally, our term life insurance products do not provide for cash surrender values.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Cash value of surrenders	$	236		$	196		$	493		$	374

Cash value of surrenders as a percentage of mean future benefit reserves, policyholders’ account balances, and separate account balances		5.0	%		3.5	%		5.1	%		3.2	%

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. The total cash value of surrenders increased $40 million, from $196 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $236 million in the second quarter of 2009, reflecting a greater volume of surrenders, including lapses to extended term, of variable life insurance in 2009 compared to the prior year quarter, due primarily to market conditions and policyholders electing to surrender their policies rather than make premium payments or make the contractually required deposits needed to keep the policies in force. The level of surrenders as a percentage of mean future policy benefit reserves, policyholders’ account balances and separate account balances increased from 3.5% in the second quarter of 2008 to 5.0% in the second quarter of 2009.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. The total cash value of surrenders increased $119 million, from $374 million in the first six months of 2008 to $493 million in the first six months of 2009, reflecting a greater volume of surrenders, including lapses to extended term, of variable life insurance in 2009 compared to the prior year, due primarily to market conditions and policyholders electing to surrender their policies rather than make premium payments or make the contractually required deposits needed to keep the policies in force. The level of surrenders as a percentage of mean future policy benefit reserves, policyholders’ account balances and separate account balances increased from 3.2% in the first six months of 2008 to 5.1% in the first six months of 2009.

131

Group Insurance

Operating Results

The following table sets forth the Group Insurance segment’s operating results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Operating results:
Revenues	$	1,303		$	1,218		$	2,636		$	2,475
Benefits and expenses		1,198			1,138			2,438			2,305

Adjusted operating income		105			80			198			170
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(1)		(86	)		(116	)		(185	)		(203	)
Related charges(2)		(2	)		—			(4	)		—

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	17		$	(36	)	$	9		$	(33	)

(1)	Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

(2)	Benefits and expenses exclude related charges which represent the unfavorable (favorable) impact of Realized investment gains (losses), net, on interest credited to policyholders’ account balances.

Adjusted Operating Income

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $25 million, from $80 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $105 million in the second quarter of 2009, reflecting higher underwriting earnings in both our group life and group disability businesses primarily due to more favorable claims experience. Partially offsetting this increase was higher operating expenses primarily related to business growth.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income increased $28 million, from $170 million in the first six months of 2008 to $198 million in the first six months of 2009, reflecting higher underwriting earnings in both our group life and group disability businesses primarily due to more favorable claims experience. Partially offsetting this increase was the benefit in the first six months of 2008 of a $20 million premium adjustment for updated data on a large group life insurance case. Also offsetting the increase in adjusted operating income was higher operating expenses primarily related to business growth.

Revenues

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” increased by $85 million, from $1.218 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $1.303 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Group life premiums and policy charges and fee income increased by $39 million, from $810 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $849 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting growth of business in force resulting from new sales and continued strong persistency. Group disability premiums and policy charges and fee income, which include long-term care products, increased by $46 million from $225 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $271 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting growth in business in force resulting from new sales and continued strong persistency.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues increased by $161 million, from $2.475 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $2.636 billion in the first six months of 2009. Group life premiums and policy charges and fee income increased by $103 million, from $1.603 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $1.706 billion in the

132

first six months of 2009. This increase primarily reflects growth of business in force resulting from new sales, and strong persistency of 96% in the first six months of 2009 compared to 94% in the first six months of 2008. Partially offsetting the increase in group life premium is the premium adjustment recorded during the first six months of 2008 discussed above. Group disability premiums and policy charges and fee income, which include long-term care products, increased by $56 million from $505 million in the first six months of 2008 to $561 million in the first six months of 2009. This increase primarily reflects growth of business in force resulting from new sales, and strong persistency of 94% in the first six months of 2009 compared to 90% in the first six months of 2008.

Benefits and Expenses

The following table sets forth the Group Insurance segment’s benefits and administrative operating expense ratios for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
	(in millions)
Benefits ratio(1):
Group life	87.3	%	89.4	%	87.6	%	88.3	%
Group disability	85.6		86.2		85.9		88.9
Administrative operating expense ratio(2):
Group life	8.7		8.2		8.8		8.2
Group disability	18.1		22.3		18.0		19.6

(1)	Ratio of policyholder benefits to earned premiums, policy charges and fee income. Group disability ratios include long-term care products.

(2)	Ratio of administrative operating expenses (excluding commissions) to gross premiums, policy charges and fee income. Group disability ratios include long-term care products.

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” increased by $60 million, from $1.138 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $1.198 billion in the second quarter of 2009. This increase reflects a $53 million increase in policyholders’ benefits, including the change in policy reserves, from $919 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $972 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to growth of business in force, partially offset by more favorable claims experience in both our group life and group disability businesses. Also contributing to the increase in benefits and expenses were higher operating expenses primarily related to business growth.

The group life benefits ratio improved 2.1 percentage points from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009, due to more favorable mortality experience. The group disability benefits ratio improved 0.6 percentage points from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009, due to more favorable claim experience. The group life administrative operating expense ratio was relatively unchanged from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009. The group disability administrative operating expense ratio improved from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009, as growth in the business outpaced the related increase in operating expenses.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses increased by $133 million, from $2.305 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $2.438 billion in the first six months of 2009. This increase reflects a $112 million increase in policyholders’ benefits, including the change in policy reserves, from $1.864 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $1.976 billion in the first six months of 2009, primarily due to growth of business in force, partially offset by more favorable claims experience in both our group life and group disability businesses. Also contributing to the increase in benefits and expenses were higher operating expenses primarily related to business growth.

133

The group life benefits ratio improved 0.7 percentage points from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009, due to more favorable mortality experience. Excluding the impact of the premium adjustment discussed above, the group life benefits ratio improved approximately 1.8 percentage points. The group disability benefits ratio improved 3.0 percentage points from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009, due to more favorable claim experience. The group life administrative operating expense ratio was relatively unchanged from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009. The group disability administrative operating expense ratio improved from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009, as growth in the business outpaced the related increase in operating expenses.

Sales Results

The following table sets forth the Group Insurance segment’s annualized new business premiums for the periods indicated. In managing our group insurance business, we analyze annualized new business premiums, which do not correspond to revenues under U.S. GAAP, because annualized new business premiums measure the current sales performance of the business unit, while revenues primarily reflect the renewal persistency and aging of in force policies written in prior years and net investment income, in addition to current sales.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
	(in millions)
Annualized new business premiums(1):
Group life	$	35	$	30	$	245	$	142
Group disability(2)		26		17		160		131

Total	$	61	$	47	$	405	$	273

(1)

Amounts exclude new premiums resulting from rate changes on existing policies, from additional coverage under our Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance contract and from excess premiums on group universal life insurance that build cash value but do not purchase face amounts, and include premiums from the takeover of claim liabilities.

(2)	Includes long-term care products.

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Total annualized new business premiums increased $14 million, from $47 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $61 million in the second quarter of 2009. Group life sales increased $5 million due to increased large case sales to existing customers, partially offset by lower premiums associated with the assumption of existing liabilities from third parties, during the second quarter of 2009. Group disability sales increased $9 million due to increased sales to new customers and higher premiums associated with the assumption of existing liabilities from third parties during the second quarter of 2009.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Total annualized new business premiums increased $132 million, from $273 million in the first six months of 2008 to $405 million in the first six months of 2009. Group life sales increased $103 million driven primarily by increased large case sales to both new and existing customers during the first six months of 2009. Group disability sales increased $29 million primarily due to increased sales to new and existing customers, partially offset by lower premiums associated with the assumption of existing liabilities from third parties during the first six months of 2009.

International Insurance and Investments Division

Impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on earnings

As a U.S.-based company with significant business operations outside the U.S., we seek to mitigate the risk that future unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate movements will reduce our U.S. dollar equivalent earnings. The operations of our International Insurance and International Investments segments are subject to currency fluctuations that can materially affect their U.S. dollar earnings from period to period even if earnings

134

on a local currency basis are relatively constant. As discussed further below, we enter into forward currency derivative contracts, as well as “dual currency” and “synthetic dual currency” investments, as part of our strategy to effectively fix the currency exchange rates for a portion of our prospective non-U.S. dollar denominated earnings streams, thereby reducing earnings volatility from unfavorable and favorable foreign currency exchange rate movements.

Forward currency hedging program

The financial results of our International Insurance segment and International Investments segment, excluding the global commodities group, for all periods presented reflect the impact of an intercompany arrangement with Corporate and Other operations pursuant to which the segments’ non-U.S. dollar denominated earnings in all countries are translated at fixed currency exchange rates. The fixed rates are determined in connection with a currency income hedging program designed to mitigate the risk that unfavorable exchange rate changes will reduce the segments’ U.S. dollar equivalent earnings. Pursuant to this program, Corporate and Other operations executes forward currency contracts with third parties to sell the net exposure of projected earnings from the hedged currency in exchange for U.S. dollars at specified exchange rates. The maturities of these contracts correspond with the future periods in which the identified non-U.S. dollar denominated earnings are expected to be generated. This program is primarily associated with the International Insurance segment’s businesses in Japan, Korea and Taiwan and the International Investments segment’s businesses in Korea and Europe. The intercompany arrangement with Corporate and Other operations increased (decreased) revenues and adjusted operating income of each segment as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009			2008
	(in millions)
Impact on revenues and adjusted operating income:
International Insurance	$	—	$	1	$	(4	)	$	1
International Investments		1		1		4			1

Total International Insurance and Investments Division	$	1	$	2	$	—		$	2

Results of Corporate and Other operations include any differences between the translation adjustments recorded by the segments and the gains or losses recorded from the forward currency contracts that settled during the period, which includes the impact of any over or under hedge of actual earnings as a result of projected earnings differing from actual earnings. The consolidated net impact of this program recorded within the Corporate and Other operations were gains of $7 million and $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and gains of $13 million and $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The notional amount of these forward currency contracts was $2.6 billion and $2.8 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, of which $1.8 billion as of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 related to our Japanese insurance operations.

Dual currency and synthetic dual currency investments

In addition, our Japanese insurance operations also hold dual currency investments in the form of fixed maturities and loans. The principal of these dual currency investments are yen-denominated while the related interest income is U.S. dollar denominated. These investments are the economic equivalent of exchanging what would otherwise be fixed streams of yen-denominated interest income for fixed streams of U.S. dollars interest income. Our Japanese insurance operations also hold investments in yen-denominated investments that have been coupled with cross-currency coupon swap agreements, creating synthetic dual currency investments. The yen/U.S. dollar exchange rate is effectively fixed, as we are obligated in future periods to exchange fixed amounts of

135

Japanese yen interest payments generated by the yen-denominated investments for U.S. dollars at the yen/U.S. dollar exchange rates specified by the cross-currency coupon swap agreements. As of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the notional amount of these investments was ¥500 billion, or $4.4 billion, based upon the foreign currency exchange rates applicable at the time these investments were acquired. The weighted average yields generated by these investments were 2.7% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2.3% for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.

Presented below is the fair value of these instruments as reflected on our balance sheet for the periods presented.


	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Cross-currency coupon swap agreements	$	(22	)	$	12
Foreign exchange component of interest on dual currency investments		(71	)		(82	)

Total	$	(93	)	$	(70	)

The table below presents as of June 30, 2009, the yen-denominated earnings subject to our dual currency and synthetic dual currency investments and the related weighted average exchange rates resulting from these investments.


Year	(1) Interest component of dual currency investments		Cross-currency coupon swap element of synthetic dual currency investments		Yen-denominated earnings subject to these investments		Weighted average exchange rate per U.S. Dollar
	(in billions)						(Yen per $)
Remainder of 2009	¥	1.9	¥	3.0	¥	4.9	90.5
2010		3.6		5.0		8.6	88.2
2011		3.4		3.9		7.3	85.3
2012		3.1		2.9		6.0	83.0
2013-2034		33.3		53.5		86.8	79.3

Total	¥	45.3	¥	68.3	¥	113.6	80.9

(1)	Yen amounts are imputed from the contractual U.S. dollar denominated interest cash flows.

The present value of the earnings reflected in the table above, on a U.S. dollar denominated basis, is $1.0 billion as of June 30, 2009. The table above does not reflect the forward currency income hedging program discussed above. In establishing the level of yen-denominated earnings that will be hedged through the forward currency income hedging program we take into account the anticipated level of U.S. dollar denominated earnings that will be generated by dual currency and synthetic dual currency investments, as well as the anticipated level of U.S. dollar denominated earnings that will be generated by U.S. dollar denominated products and investments, which are discussed in greater detail below.

Impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on equity

Hedges of U.S. GAAP equity and available economic capital

We also seek to mitigate the risk that future unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate movements will reduce our U.S. dollar equivalent equity in foreign subsidiaries through various hedging strategies. We are in the process of developing an economic capital framework, which includes available economic capital, as discussed in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Prudential Financial—Economic Capital,” and as we further develop this framework, or as other events occur, we may alter this strategy. Available economic capital represents the excess of the fair value of assets over the fair value of liabilities for the current in force block of business. In our

136

Japanese insurance operations, we currently seek to hedge a portion of estimated available economic capital and other measures of value, including the amount attributable to the U.S. GAAP equity of our Japanese insurance operations, which totaled $5.2 billion as of June 30, 2009 excluding “Accumulated other comprehensive income” components of Stockholders’ Equity and certain other adjustments. We hedge the estimated available economic capital in our Japanese insurance operations through a variety of instruments, including U.S. dollar denominated assets. These assets are financed with yen-denominated liabilities and equity held in our Japanese insurance operations. In addition, we may also hedge estimated available economic capital using instruments held in our U.S. domiciled entities, such as U.S. dollar denominated debt that has been swapped to yen. In certain of our other foreign insurance operations, the U.S. GAAP equity exposure is mitigated by entering into forward currency contracts that generally qualify for hedge accounting treatment, and by holding U.S. dollar denominated investments. During the second quarter of 2009, we terminated our hedges of the U.S. GAAP equity exposure of our Korean operations due to a variety of considerations, including a desire to limit the potential for cash settlement outflows that would result from a strengthening Korean won.

As of June 30, 2009, the aggregate amount of the instruments serving as hedges of our estimated available economic capital in our Japanese insurance operations amounted to $6.9 billion, a decrease of $0.9 billion from the $7.8 billion hedged as of December 31, 2008. These instruments were principally comprised of available for sale U.S. dollar denominated investments with an amortized cost of $5.2 billion and held to maturity U.S. dollar denominated investments with an amortized cost of $0.8 billion held in our Japanese insurance operations, as well as $0.8 billion of net yen-denominated liabilities held in our U.S. domiciled entities, including a portion that has been converted to yen using swaps. The effects of the U.S. dollar denominated liabilities are reported in Corporate & Other operations. These amounts do not reflect the forward currency income hedging program or dual currency and synthetic dual currency investments discussed above, which when added to the $6.9 billion of instruments serving as an equity hedge of our estimated available economic capital, results in a total estimated available economic capital hedge of approximately $9.7 billion as of June 30, 2009.

Available for sale investments under U.S. GAAP are carried at fair value with unrealized changes in fair value (except as described below for impairments), including those from foreign currency exchange rate movements, recorded as unrealized gains or losses in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” within Equity. Changes in the U.S. GAAP equity of our Japanese insurance operations due to foreign currency exchange rate movements are also recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” as “Foreign currency translation adjustments,” and can serve as an offset to the unrealized changes in the fair value of the available for sale investments. For the portion of available for sale investments that support our Japanese insurance operations’ U.S. GAAP equity this offset creates a “natural equity hedge.” For those U.S. dollar denominated investments, including available for sale investments, that support the portion of estimated available economic capital above our U.S. GAAP equity there is no offsetting impact to equity. In addition, the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on the U.S. GAAP equity of our Japanese insurance operations is partially offset by foreign currency exchange related changes in designated Yen-denominated debt and other hedging instruments within “Foreign currency translation adjustments.”

The investments designated as held to maturity under U.S. GAAP are recorded at amortized cost on the balance sheet, but are remeasured for foreign currency exchange rate movements, with the related change in value recorded within “Asset management fees and other income.” The remeasurement related to the change in value for foreign currency exchange rate movements for these investments is excluded from adjusted operating income, as part of our application of the hedge of available economic capital.

The U.S. dollar denominated investments that hedge a portion of our estimated available economic capital in our Japanese insurance operations pay a coupon, which is reflected within “Net investment income,” and, therefore, included in adjusted operating income, which is approximately 200 to 300 basis points greater than what a similar yen-based investment would pay. The incremental impact of this higher yield will vary over time, and is dependent on the duration of the underlying investment, as well as interest rate environments in the U.S. and Japan at the time of the investment. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account

137

Investments—General Account Investments—Investment Results” for a discussion of the investment yields generated by our Japanese insurance operations.

Because these U.S. dollar denominated investments are recorded on the books of yen-based entities, foreign currency exchange movements will impact their value. To the extent the value of the yen strengthens as compared to the U.S. dollar, the value of these U.S. dollar denominated investments will decrease as a result of changes in the foreign currency exchange rates. Upon the ultimate sale or maturity of the U.S. dollar denominated investments, any realized change in value related to changes in the foreign currency exchange rates will be included in “Realized gains (losses), net” within the income statement and, excluded from adjusted operating income. Similarly, other-than-temporary impairments on these investments may include the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which in certain circumstances will be included in “Realized gains (losses), net” within the income statement, and, as such, excluded from adjusted operating income. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Other-than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities” for a discussion of our policies regarding impairments.

In 2008, we began incorporating the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on the remaining U.S. dollar denominated net asset position of our Japanese insurance operations, which primarily relates to accrued investment income, as part of our overall application of the hedge of available economic capital. These U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are remeasured for foreign currency exchange rate movements, as they are non-yen denominated items on the books of yen-based entities, and the related change in value is recorded within “Asset management fees and other income.” As these U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities are included in the determination of the Japanese insurance operations’ level of available economic capital, we exclude all remeasurement related to these items from adjusted operating income.

In addition, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our international insurance operations had $7.0 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively, of foreign currency exposure from U.S. dollar liabilities for U.S. dollar denominated products issued by these operations. A portion of these liabilities are coinsured to our U.S. domiciled insurance operations and supported by U.S. dollar denominated assets. For the U.S. dollar liabilities retained in Japan, our Japanese operations hold U.S. dollar denominated investments, including a significant portion that are designated as available for sale, and other related U.S. dollar denominated net assets, primarily accrued investment income, to support these products. The change in value due to changes in foreign currency exchange rate movements, or remeasurement, of the related U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities associated with these products is excluded from adjusted operating income.

International Insurance

The results of our International Insurance operations are translated on the basis of weighted average monthly exchange rates, inclusive of the effects of the intercompany arrangement discussed above. To provide a better understanding of operating performance within the International Insurance segment, where indicated below, we have analyzed our results of operations excluding the effect of the year over year change in foreign currency exchange rates. Our results of operations excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations were derived by translating foreign currencies to U.S. dollars at uniform exchange rates for all periods presented, including, for constant dollar information discussed below. The exchange rates used for 2009 and 2008 were Japanese yen at a rate of 106 yen per U.S. dollar and Korean won at a rate of 950 won per U.S. dollar. In addition, for constant dollar information discussed below, activity denominated in U.S. dollars is reported based on the amounts as transacted in U.S. dollars. Annualized new business premiums presented on a constant exchange rate basis in the “Sales Results” section below reflect translation based on these same uniform exchange rates.

138

Operating Results

The following table sets forth the International Insurance segment’s operating results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Operating results:
Revenues:
Life Planner operations	$	1,539		$	1,489		$	3,181		$	3,066
Gibraltar Life		994			840			1,889			1,588

		2,533			2,329			5,070			4,654
Benefits and expenses:
Life Planner operations		1,224			1,203			2,572			2,495
Gibraltar Life		844			673			1,608			1,293

		2,068			1,876			4,180			3,788

Adjusted operating income:
Life Planner operations		315			286			609			571
Gibraltar Life		150			167			281			295

		465			453			890			866

Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(1)		(320	)		(307	)		(777	)		(375	)
Related charges(1)(2)		17			27			69			—
Investment gains (losses) on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, net(3)		111			45			59			(112	)
Change in experience-rated contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes(4)		(111	)		(45	)		(59	)		112
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests(5)		1			1			3			2

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	163		$	174		$	185		$	493

(1)

Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related charges and adjustments. The related charges represent payments related to the market value adjustment features of certain of our annuity products and the impact of Realized investment gains (losses), net, on the amortization of unearned revenue reserves. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

(2)

Benefits and expenses exclude related charges that represent the element of “Dividends to policyholders” that is based on a portion of certain realized investment gains required to be paid to policyholders and the impact of Realized investment gains (losses), net, on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs.

(3)	Revenues exclude net investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities. See “—Investment Gains and Losses on Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities and Changes in Experience-Rated Contractholder Liabilities Due to Asset Value Changes.”

(4)

(5)

Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures are included in adjusted operating income but excluded from income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis on an after-tax basis as a separate line in our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are excluded from adjusted operating income but included in income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis as a separate line in our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of earnings from consolidated entities that relates to the equity interests of minority investors.

139

On May 1, 2009, our Gibraltar Life operations acquired Yamato Life, a Japanese life insurance company that declared bankruptcy in October 2008. Gibraltar Life served as the reorganization sponsor for Yamato and under the reorganization agreement acquired Yamato by contributing $72 million of capital to Yamato. As of June 30, 2009, the Statement of Financial Position of Prudential Financial reflects $2.3 billion of assets and $2.3 billion of liabilities related to Yamato. Subsequent to the acquisition, we renamed the acquired company Prudential Financial of Japan Life Insurance Company Ltd.

Adjusted Operating Income

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income from Life Planner operations increased $29 million, from $286 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $315 million in the second quarter of 2009, including a $3 million unfavorable impact of currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations and the benefit recognized in the second quarter of 2008 of $13 million for the reversal of charges recorded in prior periods related to lapsed policies, adjusted operating income increased $45 million from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009. This increase primarily reflects a $25 million benefit in the second quarter of 2009 from the continuing migration to a new policy valuation system that resulted in favorable refinements that mostly benefited our Japanese Life Planner operations in the current period. We anticipate completing this initiative in 2010. Adjusted operating income also benefited from the continued growth of our Japanese Life Planner operation.

Gibraltar Life’s adjusted operating income decreased $17 million, from $167 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $150 million in the second quarter of 2009, with no impact from currency fluctuations. This decrease in adjusted operating income is primarily due to a decline in expense and other margins, including a detriment of $7 million in the second quarter of 2009 from the continuing migration to a new policy valuation system that resulted in unfavorable refinements in the current period.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income from Life Planner operations increased $38 million, from $571 million in the first six months of 2008 to $609 million in the first six months of 2009, including a $4 million unfavorable impact of currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations and the benefit recognized in the first six months of 2008 of $13 million for the reversal of charges recorded in prior periods related to lapsed policies, adjusted operating income increased $55 million from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009. This increase primarily reflects the continued growth of our Japanese Life Planner operation, as well as improved investment income margins. The improved investment income margins primarily reflect higher investment yields and investment portfolio growth. In addition, adjusted operating income benefited by $25 million in the first six months of 2009 due to the migration to a new policy valuation system discussed above. Partially offsetting these items was higher general and administrative expenses, as discussed below, and increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs reflecting slightly less favorable persistency and unfavorable market conditions.

Gibraltar Life’s adjusted operating income decreased $14 million, from $295 million in the first six months of 2008 to $281 million in the first six months of 2009, with no impact from currency fluctuations. This decrease in adjusted operating income is due to a decline in expense and other margins, which reflects higher general and administrative expenses, as well as a detriment of $7 million in the first six months of 2009 due to the migration to a new policy valuation system as discussed above. Offsetting these decreases were more favorable mortality experience than that of the prior year period and improved investment income margins.

Revenues

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” increased $204 million, from $2.329 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $2.533 billion in the second quarter of 2009, including a net favorable impact of $7 million relating to currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, revenues increased $197 million, from $2.313 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $2.510 billion in the second quarter of 2009.

140

Revenues from our Life Planner operations increased $50 million, from $1.489 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $1.539 billion in the second quarter of 2009, including a net unfavorable impact of currency fluctuations of $38 million. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, revenues increased $88 million from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009. This increase in revenues came primarily from increases in premiums and policy charges and fee income of $66 million, from $1.224 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $1.290 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Premiums and policy charges and fee income from our Japanese Life Planner operation increased $56 million, from $850 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $906 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting growth of business in force from new sales and continued strong persistency. Also reflected in the increase in premiums and policy charges and fee income is the benefit from the migration to a new policy valuation system discussed above. Net investment income also increased $25 million, from $235 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $260 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to investment portfolio growth.

Revenues from Gibraltar Life increased $154 million, from $840 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $994 million in the second quarter of 2009, including a favorable impact from currency fluctuations of $45 million. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, revenues for Gibraltar Life increased $109 million from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009. This increase reflects a $99 million increase in premiums, from $557 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $656 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily driven by an increase in single premium whole life sales in the current quarter.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues increased $416 million, from $4.654 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $5.070 billion in the first six months of 2009, including a net favorable impact of $90 million relating to currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, revenues increased $326 million, from $4.649 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $4.975 billion in the first six months of 2009.

Revenues from our Life Planner operations increased $115 million, from $3.066 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $3.181 billion in the first six months of 2009, including a net unfavorable impact of currency fluctuations of $76 million. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, revenues increased $191 million from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009. This increase in revenues came primarily from increases in premiums and policy charges and fee income of $125 million, from $2.543 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $2.668 billion in the first six months of 2009. Premiums and policy charges and fee income from our Japanese Life Planner operation increased $107 million, from $1.794 million in the first six months of 2008 to $1.901 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily reflecting growth of business in force from new sales and continued strong persistency. Net investment income also increased $61 million, from $463 million in the first six months of 2008 to $524 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily due to investment portfolio growth.

Revenues from Gibraltar Life increased $301 million, from $1.588 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $1.889 billion in the first six months of 2009, including a favorable impact from currency fluctuations of $166 million. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, revenues for Gibraltar Life increased $135 million from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009. This increase principally reflects a $102 million increase in premiums, from $1.082 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $1.184 billion in the first six months of 2009, primarily driven by an increase in single premium whole life sales in the second quarter of 2009. This increase in revenues also reflects an $18 million increase in net investment income, from $472 million in the first six months of 2008 to $490 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily due to the continued growth of our U.S. dollar denominated fixed annuity product.

Due to the long-term nature of many of the products we sell in Japan, we have historically sought to add duration exposure to our Japanese investment portfolio by employing various strategies, including investing in longer-term securities or, by entering into long-duration floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps. These strategies better support the characteristics of our long-dated product liabilities, and have resulted in higher portfolio yields. Based on an evaluation of recent market conditions, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing into

141

the first quarter of 2009, we terminated or offset many of these interest rate swaps in consideration of, among other things, the interest rate environment. The resulting realized investment gains from terminating or offsetting these interest rate swaps will be recognized in adjusted operating income over periods that generally approximate the expected terms of the derivatives. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 we recognized gains of $7 million and losses of $6 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 we recognized gains of $13 million and losses of $8 million, respectively, in adjusted operating income related to these realized investment gains (losses). As of June 30, 2009, $767 million of deferred gains remain to be recognized in adjusted operating income over a weighted average period of 32 years. We continue to manage the interest rate risk profile of our businesses in the context of market conditions and relative opportunities, and we expect to resume implementing strategies to lengthen the duration of our Japanese investment portfolio as our assessment of market conditions changes. As we do so, the impact to our portfolio yields upon the resumption of these strategies will depend on the then current interest rate environment.

Benefits and Expenses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” increased $192 million, from $1.876 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $2.068 billion in the second quarter of 2009, including a net unfavorable impact of $10 million related to currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, benefits and expenses increased $182 million, from $1.847 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $2.029 billion in the second quarter of 2009.

Benefits and expenses of our Life Planner operations increased $21 million, from $1.203 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $1.224 billion in the second quarter of 2009, including a net favorable impact of $35 million from currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, benefits and expenses increased $56 million from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009. Benefits and expenses of our Japanese Life Planner operation increased $48 million from $782 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $830 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting an increase in policyholder benefits, including changes in reserves, which was driven by the growth in business in force.

Gibraltar Life’s benefits and expenses increased $171 million, from $673 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $844 million in the second quarter of 2009, including a net unfavorable impact of currency fluctuations of $45 million. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, benefits and expenses increased $126 million from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009. This increase primarily reflects an increase in policyholder benefits, including changes in reserves, of $87 million due to higher single premium whole life sales in the current quarter.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses increased $392 million, from $3.788 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $4.180 billion in the first six months of 2009, including a net unfavorable impact of $94 million related to currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, benefits and expenses increased $298 million, from $3.763 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $4.061 billion in the first six months of 2009.

Benefits and expenses of our Life Planner operations increased $77 million, from $2.495 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $2.572 billion in the first six months of 2009, including a net favorable impact of $72 million from currency fluctuations. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, benefits and expenses increased $149 million from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009. Benefits and expenses of our Japanese Life Planner operation increased $117 million from $1.664 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $1.781 billion in the first six months of 2009, primarily reflecting an increase in policyholder benefits, including changes in reserves, which was driven by the growth in business in force. Also contributing to the increase in benefits and expenses was higher general and administrative expenses and increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs reflecting slightly less favorable persistency and unfavorable market conditions. Reflected in the higher general and administrative expenses is $10 million of expenses recorded in the first six months of 2009 for the Life Planner operations related to an on-going initiative in Japan to enhance our information processes and technology systems in order to improve efficiency and lower costs.

142

Gibraltar Life’s benefits and expenses increased $315 million, from $1.293 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $1.608 billion in the first six months of 2009, including a net unfavorable impact of currency fluctuations of $166 million. Excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, benefits and expenses increased $149 million from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009. This increase reflects an increase in policyholder benefits, including changes in reserves, of $77 million reflecting higher single premium whole life sales in the second quarter of 2009, partially offset by more favorable mortality experience than that of the prior year period. Also contributing to this increase is higher amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs related to the continued growth of our U.S. dollar denominated fixed annuity product and the increase in single premium whole life sales, as well as higher general and administrative expenses.

We continue to estimate that we will incur approximately $60 million of non-capitalizable costs in 2009 related to our on-going initiative in Japan discussed above, with the vast majority of these expenditures to be recognized in our Gibraltar Life operations during the second half of 2009.

Sales Results

In managing our international insurance business, we analyze revenues, as well as annualized new business premiums, which do not correspond to revenues under U.S. GAAP. Annualized new business premiums measure the current sales performance of the segment, while revenues primarily reflect the renewal persistency of policies written in prior years and net investment income, in addition to current sales. Annualized new business premiums include 10% of first year premiums or deposits from single pay products. Annualized new business premiums on an actual and constant exchange rate basis are as follows for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
	(in millions)
Annualized new business premiums:
On an actual exchange rate basis:
Life Planner operations	$	181	$	188	$	401	$	423
Gibraltar Life		147		148		260		242

Total	$	328	$	336	$	661	$	665

On a constant exchange rate basis:
Life Planner operations	$	184	$	188	$	408	$	421
Gibraltar Life		139		147		244		243

Total	$	323	$	335	$	652	$	664

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. On a constant exchange rate basis, annualized new business premiums declined $12 million, from $335 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $323 million in the second quarter of 2009.

Annualized new business premiums, on a constant exchange rate basis, from our Life Planner operations decreased $4 million, as lower sales in Japan mostly reflective of the current economic environment were partially offset by higher sales in both Korea and Taiwan.

Annualized new business premiums, on a constant exchange rate basis, from our Gibraltar Life operation decreased $8 million, reflecting lower sales of U.S. dollar denominated fixed annuity products in both our Life Advisor and bank distribution channels. This decline was partially offset by sales of the recently introduced Australian dollar denominated fixed annuity product and higher sales of life products in the bank distribution channel.

143

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. On a constant exchange rate basis, annualized new business premiums declined $12 million, from $664 million in the first six months of 2008 to $652 million in the first six months of 2009.

Annualized new business premiums, on a constant exchange rate basis, from our Life Planner operations decreased $13 million, due to lower sales in Japan and Korea mostly reflective of the current economic environment.

The number of Life Planners increased by 196, or 3%, from 6,179 as of June 30, 2008 to 6,375 as of June 30, 2009, driven by increases of 103 in Taiwan, 78 in Brazil and 69 in Korea. During the same period, the number of Life Planners in Japan decreased by 92, reflective of the transfer of 177 Life Planners to Gibraltar, primarily in support of our efforts to expand our bank channel distribution and to service orphaned policyholders. Factoring in these transfers, the number of Life Planners would have increased 6%, from June 30, 2008 to June 30, 2009. Prior to June 30, 2008, an additional 105 Japanese Life Planners were transferred to Gibraltar.

Annualized new business premiums, on a constant exchange rate basis, from our Gibraltar Life operation increased $1 million, reflecting sales of the recently introduced multi-currency denominated fixed annuity product and higher sales of life products in the bank distribution channel. Mostly offsetting these increases were lower sales of U.S. dollar denominated fixed annuity products in both our Life Advisor and bank distribution channels.

The number of Life Advisors increased by 477, or 8%, from 5,899 as of June 30, 2008 to 6,376 as of June 30, 2009, as both the first quarter and second quarter of 2009 included two hiring cycles. The increase in Life Advisors includes 55 of the Life Planners transferred to Gibraltar, as discussed above. The remaining transferees are not considered Life Advisors.

Investment Margins and Other Profitability Factors

Many of our insurance products sold in international markets provide for the buildup of cash values for the policyholder at mandated guaranteed interest rates. Authorities in some jurisdictions regulate interest rates guaranteed in our insurance contracts. The regulated guaranteed interest rates do not necessarily match the actual returns on the underlying investments. The spread between the actual investment returns and these guaranteed rates of return to the policyholder is an element of the profit or loss that we will experience on these products. With regulatory approval, guaranteed rates may be changed on new business. While these actions enhance our ability to set rates commensurate with available investment returns, the major sources of profitability on our products, other than those sold by Gibraltar Life, are margins on mortality, morbidity and expense charges rather than investment spreads.

We base premiums and cash values in most countries in which we operate on mandated mortality and morbidity tables. Our mortality and morbidity experience in the International Insurance segment on an overall basis in the first six months of 2009 and the first six months of 2008 was well within our pricing assumptions and below the guaranteed levels reflected in the premiums we charge.

144

International Investments

Operating Results

The following table sets forth the International Investments segment’s operating results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Operating results:
Revenues	$	108		$	148		$	209		$	318
Expenses		92			122			183			267

Adjusted operating income		16			26			26			51
Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(1)		—			—			—			3
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests(2)		(11	)		(5	)		(19	)		(14	)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	5		$	21		$	7		$	40

(1)	Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

(2)

Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures are included in adjusted operating income but excluded from income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis on an after-tax basis as a separate line in our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are excluded from adjusted operating income but included in income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis as a separate line in our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of earnings from consolidated entities that relates to the equity interests of minority investors.

In 2004, we acquired an 80 percent interest in Hyundai Investment and Securities Co., Ltd., a Korean asset management firm, from an agency of the Korean government. We subsequently renamed the company Prudential Investment & Securities Co., Ltd, or PISC. On January 25, 2008, we acquired the remaining 20 percent for $90 million and PISC is now a wholly owned operation.

On January 18, 2008, we made an additional investment of $154 million in our UBI Pramerica operating joint venture in Italy, which we account for under the equity method. This additional investment was necessary to maintain our ownership interest at 35 percent and was a result of the merger of our joint venture partner with another Italian bank, and their subsequent consolidation of the asset management companies into the UBI Pramerica joint venture.

On July 1, 2008, we acquired a 40 percent interest in GAP Asset Management of Brazil, which we account for under the equity method as an operating joint venture.

On May 25, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Mexican financial services group Grupo Actinver SA to sell our mutual fund and banking operations in Mexico. As a result, we have reflected these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented as of June 30, 2009. This transaction is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to close in the third quarter of 2009. This transaction does not include our insurance business, our pension fund business or our real estate investments that are located in Mexico. Income (loss) from discontinued operations reflects $(1) million and $0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $(1) million and $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to these operations.

145

Adjusted Operating Income

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $10 million, from $26 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $16 million in the second quarter of 2009. This decrease reflects lower results from the segment’s Korean asset management operation, primarily due to a decline in asset based fees and the culmination of the agreement with the Korean government discussed below. Also contributing to the decline in adjusted operating income was less favorable sales and trading results from the segment’s global commodities group. The adjusted operating income of our Korean asset management operation includes $4 million in the second quarter of 2008 of fee revenue from the Korean government under an agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition of PISC, related to the provision of asset management and brokerage services, which agreement ended on February 27, 2009.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $25 million, from $51 million in the first six months of 2008 to $26 million in the first six months of 2009. This decrease reflects lower results from the segment’s Korean asset management operation, primarily due to a decline in asset based fees and the culmination of the agreement with the Korean government discussed above. The segment’s global commodities group also contributed to the decline in adjusted operating income, as less favorable sales and trading results and a lower benefit from market value changes on securities relating to exchange memberships in the first six months of 2009, were partially offset by a $19 million credit loss related to a brokerage client that was recorded in the first six months of 2008. The adjusted operating income of our Korean asset management operation includes fee revenue from the Korean government under the agreement discussed above of $3 million and $9 million in the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Revenues

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $40 million, from $148 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $108 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting lower revenues in the Korean asset management operation and the global commodities group.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues decreased $109 million, from $318 million in the first six months of 2008 to $209 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily reflecting lower revenues in the Korean asset management operation and the global commodities group.

Expenses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $30 million, from $122 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $92 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily reflecting lower expenses corresponding with the lower level of revenues generated by the Korean asset management operation and the global commodities group.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Expenses decreased $84 million, from $267 million in the first six months of 2008 to $183 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily reflecting lower expenses corresponding with the lower level of revenues generated by the Korean asset management operation and the global commodities group.

Corporate and Other

Corporate and Other includes corporate operations, after allocations to our business segments, and real estate and relocation services.

Corporate operations consist primarily of: (1) investment returns on capital that is not deployed in any business segments; (2) returns from investments not allocated to business segments, including debt-financed

146

investment portfolios, as well as tax credit investments and other tax-enhanced investments financed by business segments; (3) capital debt that is used or will be used to meet the capital requirements of the Company and the related interest expense; (4) income and expense from qualified pension and other employee benefit plans, after allocations to business segments; (5) corporate-level income and expense, after allocations to business segments, including corporate governance, corporate advertising, philanthropic activities and deferred compensation; (6) certain retained obligations relating to policyholders whom we had previously agreed to provide insurance for reduced or no premium in accordance with contractual settlements related to prior individual life insurance sales practices remediation; (7) businesses that we have placed in wind-down status but have not divested; and (8) the impact of transactions with other segments.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Operating Results:
Corporate Operations:
Net investment income, net of interest expense, excluding capital debt interest expense	$	21		$	63		$	29		$	131
Capital debt interest expense		(123	)		(63	)		(236	)		(128	)
Pension income and employee benefits		52			67			100			132
Other corporate activities		(115	)		(84	)		(161	)		(180	)

Total Corporate Operations(1)		(165	)		(17	)		(268	)		(45	)
Real Estate and Relocation Services		3			(3	)		(60	)		(26	)

Adjusted operating income		(162	)		(20	)		(328	)		(71	)

Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments(2)		(113	)		148			110			(9	)
Investment gains on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, net(1)(3)		—			—			—			—
Divested businesses(4)		(24	)		10			(56	)		(57	)
Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests(5)		9			(36	)		29			(82	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	(290	)	$	102		$	(245	)	$	(219	)

(1)	Includes consolidating adjustments.

(2)	Revenues exclude Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.”

(3)	Revenues exclude net investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities. See “—Investment Gains and Losses on Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities and Changes in Experience-Rated Contractholder Liabilities Due to Asset Value Changes.”

(4)	See “—Divested Businesses.”

(5)

Equity in earnings of operating joint ventures are included in adjusted operating income but excluded from income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis on an after-tax basis as a separate line on our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests are excluded from adjusted operating income but included in income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures as they are reflected on a U.S. GAAP basis as a separate line in our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations. Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of earnings from consolidated entities that relates to the equity interests of minority investors.

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $142 million, from a loss of $20 million in the second quarter of 2008 to a loss of $162 million in the second quarter of 2009. Adjusted operating income from corporate operations decreased $148 million, from a loss of $17 million in the second quarter of 2008 to a loss of $165 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to increased interest expense on capital debt and lower investment earnings. Capital debt interest expense increased $60 million due

147

to a greater level of capital debt, which includes the issuance in June 2008 of $1.5 billion of junior subordinated notes and reflects the use of a portion of the proceeds from prior sales of retail medium-term notes for general corporate purposes in 2009. Previously, these proceeds were used to support an asset portfolio within the Retirement segment for which the Company has employed a substitute funding source, as discussed in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financing Activities.” Investment income, net of interest expense, excluding capital debt interest expense, decreased $42 million, primarily reflecting lower earnings from the investment of proceeds from our convertible debt issuances, as discussed below, as well as other borrowings, and lower yields on cash and other invested assets. Also contributing to the greater loss in adjusted operating income in 2009 are increased losses from other corporate activities, which reflects an increase in our deferred compensation liabilities and other retained corporate expenses, which was partially offset by a decline in the level of costs related to our retained obligations to certain policyholders with whom we had previously agreed to provide insurance for reduced or no premium in accordance with contractual settlements related to prior individual life sales practice remediation. Both our deferred compensation liabilities and our retained obligations to certain policyholders are impacted by changes in equity and other market levels.

The proceeds from our $2 billion December 2006 convertible debt issuance were used to fund an investment portfolio of fixed income securities until December 2007. These proceeds, as well as the remaining proceeds from our $3 billion December 2007 convertible debt issuance, were invested primarily in short-term investments or used to support operating needs in lieu of other short-term borrowings. In December 2008, we repurchased substantially all of our $2 billion December 2006 convertible debt issuance at par plus accrued interest as required by the holders under the terms of the notes. In December 2008, we repurchased, in individually negotiated transactions, $853 million of our $3 billion December 2007 convertible debt issuance, which notes were offered to us by certain holders. In March 2009, we repurchased an additional $245 million of our $3 billion December 2007 convertible debt issuance, also in individually negotiated transactions, which notes were offered to us by certain holders. The March 2009 repurchase resulted in a pre-tax gain of $7 million, which is included in other corporate activities. In June 2009, we repurchased an additional $1,819 million of our $3 billion December 2007 convertible debt issuance at par plus accrued interest as required by the holders under the terms of the notes. As of June 30, 2009, $87 million of convertible senior notes remain outstanding.

Corporate operations pension income and employee benefits decreased $15 million. The decrease reflects increased post-retirement benefit costs due to the amortization of prior year losses and lower investment returns due to the lower asset base reflective of current markets, partially offset by an increase in income from our qualified pension plan. Income from our qualified pension plan increased $5 million, from $72 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $77 million in the second quarter of 2009.

Adjusted operating income of our real estate and relocation services business increased $6 million, from a loss of $3 million in the second quarter of 2008 to income of $3 million in the second quarter of 2009. Our real estate and relocation services business continues to experience lower royalty fees and lower relocation revenue from real estate referral fees due to unfavorable residential real estate market conditions. The lower fees and relocation revenues in the second quarter of 2009 are offset by lower operating expenses, lower loan loss provisions, and a benefit from a change in estimate from our share of earnings from equity method investments previously recorded. Certain of our clients utilize a fixed fee home sale program under which we assume the benefits and burdens of ownership with respect to a relocating employee’s home that is purchased by us, including carrying costs and any loss on sale. As of June 30, 2009, we held in unsold inventory homes with a net value of $47 million under this program.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Adjusted operating income decreased $257 million, from a loss of $71 million in the first six months of 2008 to a loss of $328 million in the first six months of 2009. Adjusted operating income from corporate operations decreased $223 million, from a loss of $45 million in the first six months of 2008 to a loss of $268 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily due to lower investment earnings and increased interest expense on capital debt. Investment income, net of interest expense, excluding capital debt interest expense, decreased $102 million, primarily reflecting lower earnings from the investment of

148

proceeds from our convertible debt issuances, as discussed above, as well as other borrowings, including borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, and lower yields on cash and other invested assets. Capital debt interest expense increased by $108 million due to a greater level of capital debt, which includes the issuance in June 2008 of $1.5 billion of junior subordinated notes and reflects the use of a portion of the proceeds from prior sales of retail medium-term notes for general corporate purposes in 2009. Previously, these proceeds were used to support an asset portfolio within the Retirement segment for which the Company has employed a substitute funding source, as discussed in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Financing Activities.” Partially offsetting these items was the benefit from other corporate activities of $19 million, reflecting the gain on the repurchase of some of our outstanding convertible debt, as discussed above, corporate operations hedging activities, and a decline in the level of costs related to our retained obligations to certain policyholders, as discussed above, which more than offset an increase in our deferred compensation liabilities and increases in other retained corporate expenses. Both our deferred compensation liabilities and our retained obligations to certain policyholders are impacted by financial market conditions.

Corporate operations pension income and employee benefits decreased $32 million. The decrease reflects increased post-retirement benefit costs due to the amortization of prior year losses and lower investment returns due to the lower asset base reflective of current markets, partially offset by an increase in income from our qualified pension plan. Income from our qualified pension plan increased $10 million, from $144 million in the first six months of 2008 to $154 million in the first six months of 2009.

Adjusted operating income of our real estate and relocation services business decreased $34 million, from a loss of $26 million in the first six months of 2008 to a loss of $60 million in the first six months of 2009. Our real estate and relocation services business continues to experience lower royalty fees and lower relocation revenue from real estate referral fees due to unfavorable residential real estate market conditions. Results for 2009 also include our share of the earnings from equity method investments, which include goodwill impairments recorded in 2009 within these entities. Certain of our clients utilize a fixed fee home sale program under which we assume the benefits and burdens of ownership with respect to a relocating employee’s home that is purchased by us, including carrying costs and any loss on sale. As of June 30, 2009, we held in unsold inventory homes with a net value of $47 million under this program.

Results of Operations of Closed Block Business

We established the Closed Block Business effective as of the date of demutualization. The Closed Block Business includes our in force traditional domestic participating life insurance and annuity products and assets that are used for the payment of benefits and policyholder dividends on these policies, as well as other assets and equity and related liabilities that support these policies. We no longer offer these traditional domestic participating policies. See “—Overview—Closed Block Business” for additional details.

At the end of each year, the Board of Directors of Prudential Insurance determines the dividends payable on participating policies for the following year based on the experience of the Closed Block, including investment income, net realized and unrealized investment gains, mortality experience and other factors. Although Closed Block experience for dividend action decisions is based upon statutory results, at the time the Closed Block was established, we developed, as required by U.S. GAAP, an actuarial calculation of the timing of the maximum future earnings from the policies included in the Closed Block. If actual cumulative earnings in any given period are greater than the cumulative earnings we expected, we will record this excess as a policyholder dividend obligation. We will subsequently pay this excess to Closed Block policyholders as an additional dividend unless it is otherwise offset by future Closed Block performance that is less favorable than we originally expected. The policyholder dividends we charge to expense within the Closed Block Business will include any change in our policyholder dividend obligation that we recognize for the excess of actual cumulative earnings in any given period over the cumulative earnings we expected in addition to the actual policyholder dividends declared by the Board of Directors of Prudential Insurance.

149

As of June 30, 2009, actual cumulative earnings fell below the expected cumulative earnings by $622 million, thereby eliminating the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation. Actual cumulative earnings, as required by U.S. GAAP, reflect the recognition of realized investment gains and losses in the current period, as well as changes in assets and related liabilities that support the Closed Block policies. Furthermore, due to the accumulation of net unrealized investment losses that have arisen subsequent to the establishment of the Closed Block, the policyholder dividend obligation balance as of June 30, 2009 remains at zero.

Operating Results

Management does not consider adjusted operating income to assess the operating performance of the Closed Block Business. Consequently, results of the Closed Block Business for all periods are presented only in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The following table sets forth the Closed Block Business U.S. GAAP results for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
	(in millions)
U.S. GAAP results:
Revenues	$	825		$	1,496	$	1,965		$	3,167
Benefits and expenses		1,411			1,458		2,521			3,155

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures	$	(586	)	$	38	$	(556	)	$	12

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and Equity in Earnings of Operating Joint Ventures

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures decreased $624 million, from income of $38 million in the second quarter of 2008 to a loss of $586 million in the second quarter of 2009. Results for 2009 include an increase of $509 million in net realized investment losses, from $348 million in the second quarter of 2008 to $857 million in the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to a net decrease in the market value of derivatives used in hedging and investment management duration programs, as well as higher impairments and credit losses. For a discussion of Closed Block Business realized investment gains (losses), net, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.” Net investment income, net of interest expense, decreased $83 million, primarily related to a decrease in income on joint ventures and limited partnership investments accounted for under the equity method and lower portfolio yields, including lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets. These decreases to income were partially offset by a decrease of $99 million in dividends paid and accrued to policyholders, primarily due to a decrease in the 2009 dividend scale. In addition, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased $30 million, reflecting the impact of investment losses on actual gross profits for the period compared to the previously estimated expected gross profits for the period. During the second quarter of 2009, the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation was reduced from $299 million to zero, and was a partial offset to the decline in earnings as discussed above. In the second quarter of 2008, the change in the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation of $496 million was an offset to the decline in earnings in the period. As noted above, as of June 30, 2009 actual cumulative earnings fell below the expected cumulative earnings by $622 million. There will be no cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation until this amount is recovered. Without the benefit of the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation, Closed Block Business earnings could be volatile primarily due to changes in investment results.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures decreased $568 million, from income of $12 million in the first six months of

150

2008 to a loss of $556 million in the first six months of 2009. Results for 2009 include an increase of $834 million in net realized investment losses, from $458 million in the first six months of 2008 to $1.292 billion in the first six months of 2009 primarily due to a net decrease in the market value of derivatives used in hedging and investment management duration programs, as well as higher impairments and credit losses. For a discussion of Closed Block Business realized investment gains (losses), net, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.” Net investment income, net of interest expense, decreased $177 million, primarily related to a decrease in income on joint ventures and limited partnership investments accounted for under the equity method and lower portfolio yields, including lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets. These decreases to income were partially offset by a decrease of $199 million in dividends paid and accrued to policyholders, primarily due to a decrease in the 2009 dividend scale. In addition, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased $30 million reflecting the impact of investment losses on actual gross profits for the period compared to the previously estimated expected gross profits for the period. During the first six months of 2009, the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation was reduced from $851 million to zero, and was a partial offset to the decline in earnings as discussed above. In the first six months of 2008, the change in the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation of $649 million was an offset to the decline in earnings in the period. Without the benefit of the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation, Closed Block Business earnings could be volatile primarily due to changes in investment results.

Revenues

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Revenues, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $671 million, from $1.496 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $825 million in the second quarter of 2009, principally driven by the $509 million increase in net realized investment losses and a decrease of $93 million in net investment income, as discussed above. In addition, premiums declined, with a related decrease in changes in reserves, primarily due to a lower amount of dividends used by policyholders to purchase additional insurance, as a result of the dividend scale reduction.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Revenues decreased $1.202 billion, from $3.167 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $1.965 billion in the first six months of 2009, principally driven by the $834 million increase in net realized investment losses and a decrease of $212 million in net investment income, as discussed above. In addition, premiums declined, with a related decrease in changes in reserves, primarily due to a lower amount of dividends used by policyholders to purchase additional insurance, as a result of the dividend scale reduction, and to a lesser extent, the expected in force decline as policies terminate.

Benefits and Expenses

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses, as shown in the table above under “—Operating Results,” decreased $47 million, from $1.458 billion in the second quarter of 2008 to $1.411 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Policyholders’ benefits, including changes in reserves, decreased $101 million driven by a decline in premiums, as discussed above. In addition, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased primarily due to the cumulative impact of differences between actual gross profits for the period compared to the previously estimated expected gross profits for the period. These decreases were partially offset by a $98 million increase in dividends to policyholders including an increase in the cumulative earnings policyholder dividend obligation expense of $197 million, reflecting a lower benefit, partially offset by a decrease in dividends paid and accrued to policyholders of $99 million, primarily due to a decrease in the dividend scale.

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses decreased $634 million, from $3.155 billion in the first six months of 2008 to $2.521 billion in the first six months of 2009. This decrease included a $401 million decline in dividends to policyholders reflecting a decrease in the cumulative earnings policyholder

151

dividend obligation expense of $202 million, as well as a decrease in dividends paid and accrued to policyholders of $199 million, primarily due to a decrease in the dividend scale. Policyholders’ benefits, including changes in reserves, decreased $161 million driven by a decline in premiums, as discussed above. In addition, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs decreased primarily due to the cumulative impact of differences between actual gross profits for the period compared to the previously estimated expected gross profits for the period.

Income Taxes

Our income tax provision amounted to an income tax benefit of $162 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to income tax expense of $60 million in the second quarter of 2008. The benefit in the second quarter of 2009 includes a reduction to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest of $147 million primarily related to tax years prior to 2002 as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for the 2002 tax year, additional interest on a tax refund received related to the 1997 through 2001 tax years, and changes in estimates. The remainder of the decline in income tax expense reflects the decline in pre-tax income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009.

Our income tax provision amounted to an income tax benefit of $158 million in the first six months of 2009 compared to income tax expense of $83 million in the first six months of 2008. The benefit in the first six months of 2009 includes a reduction to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest of $151 million primarily related to tax years prior to 2002 as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for the 2002 tax year, additional interest on a tax refund received related to the 1997 through 2001 tax years, and changes in estimates. The remainder of the decline in income tax expense reflects the decline in pre-tax income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity in earnings of operating joint ventures from the first six months of 2008 to the first six months of 2009.

The statute of limitations for the 2003 tax year expired on July 31, 2009. As a result, our income tax provision for the third quarter of 2009 will include a reduction to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits and interest of approximately $165 million related to tax years prior to 2002.

We employ various tax strategies, including strategies to minimize the amount of taxes resulting from realized capital gains.

The dividends received deduction, or DRD, reduces the amount of dividend income subject to U.S. tax and is a significant component of the difference between our effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. The DRD for the current period was estimated using information from 2008, current year results, and was adjusted to take into account the current year’s equity market performance. The actual current year DRD can vary from the estimate based on factors such as, but not limited to, changes in the amount of dividends received that are eligible for the DRD, changes in the amount of distributions received from mutual fund investments, changes in the account balances of variable life and annuity contracts, and our taxable income before the DRD.

In August 2007, the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, released Revenue Ruling 2007-54, which included, among other items, guidance on the methodology to be followed in calculating the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. In September 2007, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2007-61. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspends Revenue Ruling 2007-54 and informs taxpayers that the U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS have indicated that they intend to address through new regulations the issues considered in Revenue Ruling 2007-54, including the methodology to be followed in determining the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. On May 11, 2009, the Obama Administration released the “General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals.” Although the Administration has not released proposed statutory language, one proposal would change the method used to determine the amount of the DRD. A change in the DRD, including the possible retroactive or prospective elimination of this deduction through regulation or

152

legislation, could increase our actual tax expense and reduce our consolidated net income. These activities had no impact on our 2008 or 2009 results.

In December 2006, the IRS completed all fieldwork with respect to its examination of the consolidated federal income tax returns for tax years 2002 and 2003. The final report was initially submitted to the Joint Committee on Taxation for their review in April 2007. The final report was resubmitted in March 2008 and again in April 2008. The Joint Committee returned the report to the IRS for additional review of an industry issue regarding the methodology for calculating the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The IRS completed its review of the issue and proposed an adjustment with respect to the calculation of the DRD. In order to expedite receipt of an income tax refund related to the 2002 and 2003 tax years, we have agreed to such adjustment. The report, with the adjustment to the DRD, was submitted to the Joint Committee on Taxation in October 2008. We were advised on January 2, 2009 that the Joint Committee completed its consideration of the report and has taken no exception to the conclusions reached by the IRS. Accordingly, the final report was processed and a $157 million refund was received in February 2009. We believe that our return position with respect to the calculation of the DRD is technically correct. Therefore, we intend to file a protective refund claim within six months of the expiration of the respective statutes of limitations to recover the taxes associated with the agreed upon adjustment and to pursue such other actions as appropriate. These activities had no impact on our 2008 or 2009 results.

In January 2007, the IRS began an examination of tax years 2004 through 2006. For tax years 2007, 2008 and 2009, we participated in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Program, or CAP. Under CAP, the IRS assigns an examination team to review completed transactions contemporaneously during these tax years in order to reach agreement with us on how they should be reported in the tax return. If disagreements arise, accelerated resolutions programs are available to resolve the disagreements in a timely manner before the tax returns are filed. It is management’s expectation that this program will shorten the time period between the filing of our federal income tax returns and the IRS’s completion of its examination of the returns.

Our affiliates in Japan file separate tax returns and are subject to audits by the local taxing authority. The general statute of limitations is 5 years from when the return is filed. During 2009, the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau concluded a routine tax audit of the tax returns of Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd. for its tax years ending March 31, 2004 to March 31, 2008. These activities had no material impact on our 2008 and 2009 results.

153

Discontinued Operations

Included within net income are the results of businesses which are reflected as discontinued operations under U.S. GAAP. A summary of the results of discontinued operations by business is as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Real estate investments sold or held for sale	$	26		$	—		$	28		$	1
Equity sales, trading and research operations		1			(1	)		1			(2	)
International securities operations		1			(3	)		1			(2	)
Mexican asset management operations		(1	)		—			(1	)		1

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes		27			(4	)		29			(2	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		6			(1	)		7			(1	)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	$	21		$	(3	)	$	22		$	(1	)

Real estate investments sold or held for sale reflects the income from discontinued real estate investments.

For additional information regarding discontinued operations, see Note 3 of the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Divested Businesses

Our income from continuing operations includes results from several businesses that have been or will be sold or exited that do not qualify for “discontinued operations” accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP. The results of these divested businesses are reflected in our Corporate and Other operations, but excluded from adjusted operating income. A summary of the results of the divested businesses that have been excluded from adjusted operating income is as follows for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Financial Advisory	$	(15	)	$	23		$	(40	)	$	68
Commercial mortgage securitization operations		(9	)		(16	)		(13	)		(123	)
Exchange shares previously held by Prudential Equity Group		—			(2	)		—			(7	)
Property and casualty insurance		1			2			2			1
Prudential Securities capital markets		(1	)		3			(5	)		4

Total divested businesses excluded from adjusted operating income	$	(24	)	$	10		$	(56	)	$	(57	)

Financial Advisory

In 2008, we classified our Financial Advisory business as a divested business, reflecting our intention to exit this business, as discussed in more detail below. This business consists of our investment in the Wachovia Securities joint venture described below, in addition to expenses relating to obligations and costs we retained in connection with the businesses we contributed to the joint venture, primarily for litigation and regulatory matters.

154

St. Louis, Missouri. On October 1, 2007, Wachovia completed the acquisition of A.G. Edwards, Inc. and on January 1, 2008 contributed the retail securities brokerage business of A.G. Edwards to the joint venture. Wachovia’s contribution of this business entitled us to elect a “lookback” option (which we elected) permitting us to delay for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 our decision whether or not to make payments to avoid or limit dilution of our initial 38% ownership interest in the joint venture or, alternatively, to “put” our joint venture interests to Wachovia based on the appraised value of the joint venture, excluding the A.G. Edwards business, as of January 1, 2008. Subsequently, Wachovia was acquired by Wells Fargo, which succeeded to the rights and obligations of Wachovia under the joint venture agreements. Wachovia Securities is now using the Wells Fargo Advisors name.

On December 4, 2008, we announced our intention to exercise our right under the “lookback” option to put our joint venture interests to Wells Fargo. On June 17, 2009, we provided notice to Wells Fargo of our exercise of our “lookback” put rights. The results associated with our joint venture interests are classified as results of a divested business, reflecting our intention to exit this business. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, we expect that the closing of the put transaction would occur on or about January 1, 2010.

Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, Wells Fargo may elect to pay the proceeds from our exercise of the “lookback” put either in cash, Wells Fargo common stock or a combination of the foregoing. We have received notice from Wells Fargo that it intends to pay the proceeds in an unspecified combination of cash and Wells Fargo common stock. Under the terms of the agreements relating to the joint venture, the number of shares of Wells Fargo common stock to be received by us will be determined by dividing the portion of the proceeds to be paid in Wells Fargo common stock by the average of the closing prices of the Wells Fargo common stock during the 10 trading day period immediately prior to the closing. The joint venture agreements provide that the Company and Wells Fargo will enter into a registration rights agreement for the registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of the Wells Fargo shares to be received at the closing.

We will bear the risk of changes in the market value of the portion of the payment received at closing in Wells Fargo common stock until such stock is disposed of. We are evaluating our options for mitigating potential reductions in the ultimate proceeds from any common stock received at closing. Our ability to hedge such market risk may be limited and our ability to dispose of such stock will be subject to securities law and other restrictions.

We have estimated the proceeds from the exercise of the “lookback” put to be approximately $5 billion, based on a January 1, 2010 closing, the terms of the joint venture agreements and our assessment of market conditions and retail brokerage firm valuations at the relevant valuation date of January 1, 2008, producing an estimated gain upon settlement of approximately $2.7 billion or about $1.8 billion on an after-tax basis; however, the amount of such proceeds and gain have not been finally determined and could be more or less. The after-tax gain on sale would be reflected in the capital and surplus of Prudential Insurance.

Notwithstanding the terms of the joint venture agreements governing the “lookback” put, we have from time to time had discussions with Wells Fargo concerning a possible early settlement of the “lookback” put. The proceeds received upon any early settlement would take into account the time value of money, the benefits and certainty provided by an early resolution and the form of consideration to be received. Taking into account these factors, it could be expected that we may agree to an amount less than our $5 billion estimate in an early settlement. Absent an early settlement, we will proceed with the closing of the “lookback” put transaction in accordance with the relevant terms of the joint venture agreements as discussed above.

The foregoing description of the proceeds to be received in respect of our interest in the Wachovia Securities joint venture is exclusive of certain payments to which our Asset Management segment is entitled under the Sweep Feature Agreement listed as Exhibit 10.61 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Revenues received under that agreement, contributed to pre-tax adjusted operating income of our Asset Management segment in the amount of $30 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,

155

$55 million in 2008, $51 million in 2007, $51 million in 2006 and $54 million in 2005. Payments under this agreement continue, unless otherwise agreed, for ten years after the termination of the Wachovia Securities joint venture.

In connection with the establishment of the Wachovia Securities joint venture, Wachovia Securities, LLC issued a subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $417 million, which is held by Prudential Insurance. This note bears interest, payable quarterly, at three month LIBOR plus 105 basis points. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, this note becomes payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest, within thirty days of termination of the joint venture.

Commercial Mortgage Securitization Operations

In 2008, we classified our commercial mortgage securitization operations as a divested business, reflecting our decision to exit this business. These operations, which involved the origination and purchase of commercial mortgage loans that we in turn would aggregate and sell into commercial mortgage-backed securitization transactions, together with related hedging activities, were previously reported within the Asset Management segment. We retained and continue the remainder of our commercial mortgage origination, servicing and other commercial mortgage related activities, which remain a part of our Asset Management segment. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, our commercial mortgage securitization operations held loans with a principal balance of $116 million and $332 million, respectively, whose fair values continue to be subject to changes in credit spreads. The losses of $13 million and $123 million in the first six months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, primarily reflect net realized and unrealized losses on the loans, bonds and hedges from instability in the commercial mortgage-backed securities market.

Investment Gains and Losses on Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities and

Changes in Experience-Rated Contractholder Liabilities Due to Asset Value Changes

Certain products included in the Retirement and International Insurance segments, are experience-rated in that investment results associated with these products are expected to ultimately accrue to contractholders. The investments supporting these experience-rated products, excluding commercial mortgage and other loans, are classified as trading and are carried at fair value. These trading investments are reflected on the statements of financial position as “Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value.” Realized and unrealized gains and losses for these investments are reported in “Asset management fees and other income.” Interest and dividend income for these investments is reported in “Net investment income.” Commercial mortgage and other loans that support these experience-rated products are carried at unpaid principal, net of unamortized discounts and an allowance for losses, and are reflected on the statements of financial position as “Commercial mortgage and other loans.”

Adjusted operating income excludes net investment gains and losses on trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities. This is consistent with the exclusion of realized investment gains and losses with respect to other investments supporting insurance liabilities managed on a consistent basis. In addition, to be consistent with the historical treatment of charges related to realized investment gains and losses on investments, adjusted operating income also excludes the change in contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes in the pool of investments (including commercial mortgage and other loans) supporting these experience-rated contracts, which are reflected in “Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances.” The result of this approach is that adjusted operating income for these products includes net fee revenue and interest spread we earn on these experience-rated contracts, and excludes changes in fair value of the pool of investments, both realized and unrealized, that we expect will ultimately accrue to the contractholders.

Results for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include the recognition of net investment gains of $686 million and net investment losses of $123 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30,

156

2009 and 2008 include the recognition of net investment gains of $831 million and net investment losses of $385 million, respectively, on “Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value.” These net investment gains and losses primarily represent interest-rate related mark-to-market adjustments, which include the impact of changes in credit spreads on fixed maturity securities. Consistent with our treatment of “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” these gains and losses, which are expected to ultimately accrue to the contractholders, are excluded from adjusted operating income. In addition, results for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include increases of $347 million and decreases of $94 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include increases of $392 million and decreases of $294 million, respectively, in contractholder liabilities due to asset value changes in the pool of investments that support these experience-rated contracts. These liability changes are reflected in “Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances” and are also excluded from adjusted operating income. Contractholder liabilities do not reflect declines in recorded asset values of $317 million and $191 million, as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which we expect to recover in future periods through increases in recorded asset values or reductions in crediting rates on contractholder liabilities.

In addition, as prescribed by U.S. GAAP, changes in the fair value of commercial mortgage and other loans held in our general account, other than when associated with impairments, are not recognized in income in the current period, while the impact of these changes in value are reflected as a change in the liability to fully participating contractholders in the current period. Included in the amounts above related to the change in the liability to contractholders related to commercial mortgage and other loans are increases of $21 million and decreases of $28 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and increases of $40 million and decreases of $17 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Valuation of Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

As discussed in Notes 2 and 12 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value that includes a hierarchy used to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1—Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to us for identical assets or liabilities. These generally provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available. Active markets are defined as having the following for the measured asset/liability: i) many transactions, ii) current prices, iii) price quotes not varying substantially among market makers, iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and v) most information publicly available. Our Level 1 assets and liabilities primarily include certain cash equivalents and short term investments, equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market. Prices are obtained from readily available sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted market prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities and other market observable inputs. Our Level 2 assets and liabilities include: fixed maturities (corporate public and private bonds, most government securities, certain asset- and mortgage-backed securities, etc.), certain equity securities and commercial mortgage loans, short-term investments and certain cash equivalents (primarily commercial paper) and certain over-the-counter derivatives. Valuations are generally

157

obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities, or through the use of valuation methodologies using observable market inputs. Prices from services are validated through comparison to trade data and internal estimates of current fair value, generally developed using market observable inputs and economic indicators.

Level 3—Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect our assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Our Level 3 assets and liabilities primarily include: certain asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages as discussed below, certain private fixed maturities and equity securities, certain manually priced public equity securities and fixed maturities, including certain asset-backed securities and securities where we chose to utilize other pricing information than that received from third parties as discussed below, certain highly structured over-the-counter derivative contracts, certain commercial mortgage loans, certain consolidated real estate funds for which we are the general partner, and embedded derivatives resulting from certain products with guaranteed benefits. Prices are determined using valuation methodologies such as option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and other similar techniques. Non-binding broker quotes, which we utilize when pricing service information is not available, are reviewed for reasonableness based on our understanding of the market, and are generally considered Level 3. Under certain conditions, based on our observations of transactions in active markets, we may conclude the prices received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not reasonable or reflective of market activity. In those instances, we may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information or quotes received and apply internally developed values to the related assets or liabilities. To the extent the internally developed valuations use significant unobservable inputs, they are classified as Level 3. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 these over-rides on a net basis were not material.

As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted FSP FAS 157-4 effective January 1, 2009. This FSP did not provide new accounting guidance but rather, clarified existing guidance regarding the calculation of fair value of an asset or liability when markets are inactive or transactions are executed in a disorderly manner. Our fair value methodologies already incorporated these concepts and accordingly, the adoption of this FSP resulted in no material changes to our valuation processes as of January 1, 2009. As discussed below, we continue to evaluate whether markets are inactive or transactions are executed in a disorderly manner on a quarterly basis. The FSP also increased the level of detail required for disclosures of fixed maturities to provide amounts separately for Corporate, Foreign Government, Asset-backed, Residential Mortgage-backed, Commercial Mortgage-backed, US Government, and State & Municipal fixed maturity securities. This level of information is required prospectively as of January 1, 2009 and accordingly, prior periods have not been presented.

As of June 30, 2009 we concluded that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was an inactive market as defined under FSP FAS 157-4. Therefore, in determining the fair value of certain asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, we considered both third-party pricing information and an internally developed price based on a discounted cash flow model. As a result, we reported fair values for these sub-prime securities which were net $693 million higher than the estimated fair values received from independent third party pricing services or brokers. The adjusted fair value of these securities was $5,362 million.

During the second quarter of 2009 we observed that the volume and level of activity in the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages remained at historically low levels. This stood in particular contrast to the markets for other structured products with similar cash flow and credit profiles, which experienced an uptick in the level of activity. We also observed significant increases in implied relative liquidity risk premiums, yields, and weighting of “worst case” cash flows for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages in comparison with our own estimates for such securities. In contrast, other spread-based asset classes, such as corporate bonds, high yield and consumer asset-backed securities, such as those collateralized by credit cards or autos, which were previously more correlated with sub-prime securities,

158

recovered in the second quarter of 2009. Based on this information, we concluded as of June 30, 2009 that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was inactive and also determined the pricing quotes we received were based on little, if any, market activity, calling into question their representation of observable fair value. Furthermore, our direct and indirect observations of the limited transactions that were occurring were dominated by forced liquidations or distressed sales and not executed in an orderly manner.

Based on this conclusion, in determining the fair value of certain asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, we considered both third-party pricing information, and an internally developed price based on a discounted cash flow model. The discount rate used in the model was based on observed spreads for other similarly structured credit markets which were active and dominated by observable orderly transactions. We also applied additional risk premiums to the discount rate to reflect the relative illiquidity and asset specific cash flow uncertainty associated with asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. This combined security-specific additional spread reflects our judgment of what an investor would demand for taking on such risks in an orderly transaction under current market conditions at the end of the second quarter 2009, and is significantly higher than would be indicative of historical spread differences between structured credit asset classes when all asset classes had active markets dominated with orderly transactions. We believe these estimated spreads are reflective of current market conditions in the sub-prime mortgage market and these spread estimates are further supported by their relationship to our recent observations of some limited transactions in shorter-duration sub-prime securities. Using this discount rate, valuations were developed based on the expected future cash flows of the assets. In determining how much weight to place on the third-party pricing information versus our discounted cash flow valuation, we considered the level of inactivity and impact of disorderly transactions. We weighted third-party pricing information as little as 30% where we had little observable market information, and as much as 90% where more observable information was available.

159

The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, for Consolidated, Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business.


	Consolidated as of June 30, 2009
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3(1)		Netting(2)			Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	—	$	6,563	$	—	$	—		$	6,563
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		748		—		—			748
Foreign government bonds		—		35,704		43		—			35,747
Corporate securities		—		81,570		1,279		—			82,849
Asset-backed securities		—		4,494		6,014		—			10,508
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		10,192		59		—			10,251
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		12,050		197		—			12,247

Sub-total		—		151,321		7,592		—			158,913

Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies		—		112		—		—			112
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		2		—		—			2
Foreign government bonds		—		479		—		—			479
Corporate securities		—		8,415		197		—			8,612
Asset-backed securities		—		423		269		—			692
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		2,127		5		—			2,132
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		1,357		24		—			1,381
Equity securities		615		186		2		—			803
All other activity		336		217		—		—			553

Sub-total		951		13,318		497		—			14,766

Other trading account assets:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies		—		59		—		—			59
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		—		—		—			—
Foreign government bonds		—		33		—		—			33
Corporate securities		10		175		59		—			244
Asset-backed securities		—		1,587		35		—			1,622
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		111		9		—			120
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		112		6		—			118
Equity securities		72		10		21		—			103
All other activity		12		4,968		906		(4,470	)		1,416

Sub-total		94		7,055		1,036		(4,470	)		3,715

Equity securities, available for sale		3,460		2,106		351		—			5,917
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—		508		—		—			508
Other long-term investments		50		133		495		—			678
Short-term investments		3,251		2,819		—		—			6,070
Cash and cash equivalents		2,039		8,432		—		—			10,471
Other assets		2,018		453		26		—			2,497

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		11,863		186,145		9,997		(4,470	)		203,535

Separate account assets(3)		54,592		82,470		14,204		—			151,266

Total assets	$	66,455	$	268,615	$	24,201	$	(4,470	)	$	354,801

Future policy benefits		—		—		796		—			796
Long-term debt		—		—		1,167		—			1,167
Other liabilities		15		4,607		79		(3,878	)		823

Total liabilities	$	15	$	4,607	$	2,042	$	(3,878	)	$	2,786

160


	Financial Services Businesses as of June 30, 2009
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3(1)		Netting(2)			Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	—	$	3,462	$	—	$	—		$	3,462
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		480		—		—			480
Foreign government bonds		—		35,151		30		—			35,181
Corporate securities		—		56,007		849		—			56,856
Asset-backed securities		—		3,534		3,423		—			6,957
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		6,736		59		—			6,795
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		9,232		121		—			9,353

Sub-total		—		114,602		4,482		—			119,084
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies		—		112		—		—			112
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		2		—		—			2
Foreign government bonds		—		479		—		—			479
Corporate securities		—		8,415		197		—			8,612
Asset-backed securities		—		423		269		—			692
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		2,127		5		—			2,132
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		1,357		24		—			1,381
Equity securities		615		186		2		—			803
All other activity		336		217		—		—			553

Sub-total		951		13,318		497		—			14,766
Other trading account assets:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies		—		59		—		—			59
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		—		—		—			—
Foreign government bonds		—		33		—		—			33
Corporate securities		10		68		47		—			125
Asset-backed securities		—		1,562		35		—			1,597
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		111		9		—			120
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		112		6		—			118
Equity securities		51		10		21		—			82
All other activity		12		4,968		906		(4,470	)		1,416

Sub-total		73		6,923		1,024		(4,470	)		3,550
Equity securities, available for sale		1,134		1,963		307		—			3,404
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—		508		—		—			508
Other long-term investments		50		59		495		—			604
Short-term investments		2,288		2,435		—		—			4,723
Cash and cash equivalents		1,987		6,802		—		—			8,789
Other assets		2,018		453		26		—			2,497

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		8,501		147,063		6,831		(4,470	)		157,925
Separate account assets(3)		54,592		82,470		14,204		—			151,266

Total assets	$	63,093	$	229,533	$	21,035	$	(4,470	)	$	309,191

Future policy benefits		—		—		796		—			796
Long-term debt		—		—		1,167		—			1,167
Other liabilities		15		4,607		79		(3,878	)		823

Total liabilities	$	15	$	4,607	$	2,042	$	(3,878	)	$	2,786

161


	Closed Block Business as of June 30, 2009
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3(1)		Netting(2)		Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies	$	—	$	3,101	$	—	$	—	$	3,101
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		268		—		—		268
Foreign government bonds		—		553		13		—		566
Corporate securities		—		25,563		430		—		25,993
Asset-backed securities		—		960		2,591		—		3,551
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		3,456		—		—		3,456
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		2,818		76		—		2,894

Sub-total		—		36,719		3,110		—		39,829

Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities		—		—		—		—		—
Other trading account assets:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies		—		—		—		—		—
Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions		—		—		—		—		—
Foreign government bonds		—		—		—		—		—
Corporate securities		—		107		12		—		119
Asset-backed securities		—		25		—		—		25
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		—		—		—		—		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities		—		—		—		—		—
Equity securities		21		—		—		—		21
All other activity		—		—		—		—		—

Sub-total		21		132		12		—		165

Equity securities, available for sale		2,326		143		44		—		2,513
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—		—		—		—		—
Other long-term investments		—		74		—		—		74
Short-term investments		963		384		—		—		1,347
Cash and cash equivalents		52		1,630		—		—		1,682
Other assets		—		—		—		—		—

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		3,362		39,082		3,166		—		45,610

Separate account assets(3)		—		—		—		—		—

Total assets	$	3,362	$	39,082	$	3,166	$	—	$	45,610

Future policy benefits		—		—		—		—		—
Long-term debt		—		—		—		—		—
Other liabilities		—		—		—		—		—

Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

(1)

The amount of Level 3 assets taken as a percentage of total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled 7% for Consolidated, Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business. Excluding separate account assets for which the risk is borne by the policyholder, the amount of Level 3 assets taken as a percentage of total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled 5% and 4% for Consolidated and Financial Services Businesses, respectively. The amount of Level 3 liabilities was immaterial to our balance sheet.

(2)	“Netting” amounts represent cash collateral and the impact of offsetting asset and liability positions held with the same counterparty as permitted by FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts and FSP FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39.

(3)

Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by us with respect to certain accounts. Separate account assets classified as Level 3 consist primarily of real estate and real estate investment funds. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in our Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

162


	Consolidated as of December 31, 2008
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3(1)		Netting(2)			Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale	$	—	$	155,787	$	2,269	$	—		$	158,056
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities		748		12,982		145		—			13,875
Other trading account assets		143		9,882		1,396		(7,085	)		4,336
Equity securities, available for sale		3,801		1,939		325		—			6,065
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—		517		56		—			573
Other long-term investments		246		265		1,015		—			1,526
Short-term investments		2,601		1,874		—		—			4,475
Cash and cash equivalents		2,512		8,834		—		—			11,346
Other assets		1,255		2,500		26		—			3,781

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		11,306		194,580		5,232		(7,085	)		204,033

Separate account assets(3)		56,362		70,953		19,780		—			147,095

Total assets	$	67,668	$	265,533	$	25,012	$	(7,085	)	$	351,128

Future policy benefits		—		—		3,229		—			3,229
Long-term debt		—		—		324		—			324
Other liabilities		57		6,692		139		(5,948	)		940

Total liabilities	$	57	$	6,692	$	3,692	$	(5,948	)	$	4,493


	Financial Services Businesses as of December 31, 2008
	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3(1)		Netting(2)			Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale	$	—		$	117,393	$	1,760	$	—		$	119,153
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities		748			12,982		145		—			13,875
Other trading account assets		143			9,774		1,384		(7,085	)		4,216
Equity securities, available for sale		1,548			1,818		299		—			3,665
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—			517		56		—			573
Other long-term investments		246			54		1,015		—			1,315
Short-term investments		1,614			1,377		—		—			2,991
Cash and cash equivalents		2,379			7,014		—		—			9,393
Other assets		1,255			2,500		26		—			3,781

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		7,933			153,429		4,685		(7,085	)		158,962

Separate account assets(3)		56,362			70,953		19,780		—			147,095

Total assets	$	64,295		$	224,382	$	24,465	$	(7,085	)	$	306,057

Future policy benefits		—			—		3,229		—			3,229
Long-term debt		—			—		324		—			324
Other liabilities(4)		(16	)		6,692		138		(5,948	)		866

Total liabilities	$	(16	)	$	6,692	$	3,691	$	(5,948	)	$	4,419

163


	Closed Block Business as of December 31, 2008
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3(1)		Netting(2)		Total
	(in millions)
Fixed maturities, available for sale	$	—	$	38,394	$	509	$	—	$	38,903
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities		—		—		—		—		—
Other trading account assets		—		108		12		—		120
Equity securities, available for sale		2,253		121		26		—		2,400
Commercial mortgage and other loans		—		—		—		—		—
Other long-term investments		—		211		—		—		211
Short-term investments		987		497		—		—		1,484
Cash and cash equivalents		133		1,820		—		—		1,953
Other assets		—		—		—		—		—

Sub-total excluding separate account assets		3,373		41,151		547		—		45,071

Separate account assets(3)		—		—		—		—		—

Total assets	$	3,373	$	41,151	$	547	$	—	$	45,071

Future policy benefits		—		—		—		—		—
Long-term debt		—		—		—		—		—
Other liabilities		73		—		1		—		74

Total liabilities	$	73	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	74

(1)

The amount of Level 3 assets taken as a percentage of total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled 7%, 8% and 1% for Consolidated, Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business, respectively. Excluding separate account assets for which the risk is borne by the policyholder, the amount of Level 3 assets taken as a percentage of total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled 3% for both Consolidated and Financial Services Businesses. The amount of Level 3 liabilities was immaterial to our balance sheet.

(2)	“Netting” amounts represent cash collateral and the impact of offsetting asset and liability positions held with the same counterparty as permitted by FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts and FSP FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39.

(3)

Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by us with respect to certain accounts. Separate account assets classified as Level 3 consist primarily of real estate and real estate investment funds. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in our Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(4)	The negative Other liability amount for Financial Services Businesses reflects the impact of inter-company eliminations.

For additional information regarding the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value by hierarchy level see Note 12 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

The determination of fair value, which for certain assets and liabilities is dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions, can have a significant impact on our results of operations. As discussed in more detail below, the determination of fair value for certain assets and liabilities may require the application of a greater degree of judgment given current market conditions, as the ability to value assets and liabilities can be significantly impacted by a decrease in market activity or a lack of transactions executed in an orderly manner. The following sections describe the key estimates and assumptions surrounding certain assets and liabilities, measured at fair value on a recurring basis, that could have a significant impact on our results of operations or involve the use of significant unobservable inputs. Information regarding Separate Account Assets is excluded as the risk of assets for these categories is ultimately borne by our customers and policyholders.

Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities

Our public fixed maturity securities include investments in corporate, foreign government, asset-backed, residential mortgage-backed, commercial mortgage-backed, U.S. government, and state and municipal securities. The fair values of our public fixed maturity securities are generally based on prices obtained from independent pricing services. Prices are sourced from multiple pricing services, and a vendor hierarchy is maintained by asset type based on historical pricing experience and vendor expertise. We generally receive prices from multiple

164

pricing services for each security, but ultimately use the price from the pricing service highest in the vendor hierarchy based on the respective asset type. In order to validate reasonability, prices are reviewed by our internal asset managers through comparison with directly observed recent market trades and internal estimates of current fair value, generally developed using market observable inputs and economic indicators. Consistent with the fair value hierarchy described above, securities with validated quotes from pricing services are generally reflected within Level 2. If we conclude pricing information received from third party pricing services is not reflective of market activity or other inputs we have observed in the market, we may challenge the price through a formal process with the pricing service. If the pricing service updates the price to be more consistent in comparison to our presented market observations, the security remains within Level 2.

If we ultimately conclude that pricing information received from the independent pricing service is not reflective of market activity, we use values based on non-binding broker quotes, if available. If we conclude values from both pricing services and brokers are not reflective of market activity, we may over-ride the information from the pricing service or broker with an internally developed valuation. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 over-rides on a net basis were not material. In circumstances where vendor pricing is not available, we also use internally developed valuations or non-binding broker quotes to determine fair value. These estimates may use significant unobservable inputs, which reflect our own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Circumstances where observable market data are not available may include events such as market illiquidity and credit events related to the security. Pricing service over-rides, internally developed valuations and non-binding broker quotes are generally included in Level 3 in our fair value hierarchy. As discussed above, based on our conclusion that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was inactive as of June 30, 2009, we considered both third-party pricing information and an internally developed price based on a discounted cash flow model in determining the fair value of certain of these securities. As of June 30, 2009 asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages with a fair value of $5,362 million were included in Level 3 based on the unobservable inputs used in the discounted cash flow model. Despite the dislocated markets and low levels of liquidity in 2008 and the first six months of 2009, except for our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages as discussed above, pricing received from the independent pricing services was not materially different from our internal estimates of current market value for the remainder of our fixed maturity portfolio. As a result, we generally continued to use the price provided by the independent pricing service under our normal pricing protocol.

Our private fixed maturities are primarily comprised of investments in private placement securities originated by our internal private asset managers. The fair values of these private fixed maturities are primarily determined using a discounted cash flow model, which utilizes a discount rate based upon the average of spread surveys collected from private market intermediaries who are active in both primary and secondary transactions, and takes into account, among other factors, the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer and the reduced liquidity associated with private placements. Generally, these securities have been reflected within Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy. For certain of these securities, the discounted cash flow model may also incorporate significant unobservable inputs, which reflect our own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Accordingly, these securities have been reflected within Level 3 in our fair value hierarchy.

Private fixed maturities also include debt investments in funds that, in addition to a stated coupon, pay a return based upon the results of the underlying portfolios. The fair values of these securities are determined by reference to the funds’ net asset value (NAV). Any restrictions on our ability to redeem our interests in these funds at NAV are considered to have a de minimis effect on the fair value. Since the NAV at which the funds trade can be observed by redemption and subscription transactions between third parties, the fair values of these investments have been reflected within Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy.

Our Level 3 fixed maturity securities generally include certain public fixed maturities and private fixed maturities priced internally based on observable and unobservable inputs. As of June 30, 2009 our Level 3 fixed maturity securities also included certain asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages with a fair

165

value of $5,362 million. As discussed above, we reported fair values for these sub-prime securities which were net $693 million higher than the estimated fair values received from third party pricing services or brokers, based on our determination that as of June 30, 2009, the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages was an inactive market. The $693 million increase in fair value included $660 million relating to available-for-sale securities, with $365 million related to securities attributable to our Financial Services Businesses and $295 million related to securities attributable to our Closed Block Business. The increase to the fair value of these available-for-sale securities resulted in a corresponding increase to “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net,” The remaining $33 million increase in fair value related to trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities in our Financial Services Business, and resulted in a corresponding increase in “Asset management fees and other income.” Excluding these asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, about half of our Level 3 fixed maturity securities were public fixed maturities, with values primarily based on non-binding broker-quotes, and about half were private fixed maturities, with values primary based on internally developed models, as discussed above. Significant unobservable inputs used included: issue specific credit adjustments, material non-public financial information, management judgment, estimation of future earnings and cashflows, default rate assumptions, liquidity assumptions and non-binding quotes from market makers. These inputs are usually considered unobservable, as not all market participants will have access to this data. As of December 31, 2008 we classified approximately $122 million of our investments in asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages as Level 3, primarily reflecting securities valued based on non-binding broker quotes. The vast majority of our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages were valued as of December 31, 2008 using information from independent pricing services, and were included in Level 2 based on the process described above. Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) for Level 3 Available for Sale fixed maturities totaled $(333) million and $1,129 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $(85) million and $(7) million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) for Level 3 Available for Sale fixed maturities totaled $(414) million and $866 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and $(229) million and $(129) million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

For additional information regarding our holdings of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, see, “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities.” While the fair value of these investments, as well as others within our portfolio of fixed maturities, are in a significant unrealized loss position due to increased credit spreads and illiquidity in the financial markets, we believe the ultimate value that will be realized from these investments is greater than that reflected by their current fair value.

Valuation of Equity Securities

Equity securities consist principally of investments in common and preferred stock of publicly traded companies, privately traded securities, as well as common stock mutual fund shares. The fair values of most publicly traded equity securities are based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and are classified within Level 1 in our fair value hierarchy. Estimated fair values for privately traded equity securities are determined using valuation and discounted cash flow models that require a substantial level of judgment. In determining the fair value of certain privately traded equity securities the discounted cash flow model may also use unobservable inputs, which reflect our own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Most privately traded equity securities are classified within Level 3. The fair values of common stock mutual fund shares that transact regularly (but do not trade in active markets because they are not publicly available) are based on transaction prices of identical fund shares and are classified within Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy. The fair values of preferred equity securities are based on prices obtained from independent pricing services and, in order to validate reasonability, are compared with recent market trades we have directly observed. Accordingly, these securities are generally classified within Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy.

166

Impact of Valuation of Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities on Results of Operations

The impact our determination of fair value for fixed maturity and equity securities has on our results of operations is dependent on our classification of the security as either trading, available for sale, or held to maturity. For our investments classified as trading, the impact of changes in fair value is recorded within “Asset management fees and other income.” For our investments classified as available for sale, the impact of changes in fair value is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net,” a separate component of equity. Our investments classified as held to maturity are carried at amortized cost. In addition, investments classified as available for sale, as well as those classified as held to maturity, are subject to impairment reviews to identify when a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary. When it is determined that a decline in value of an equity security is other-than-temporary, the carrying value of the equity security is impaired to its fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings. Under FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, effective January 1, 2009, when an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the debt security meets either of these two criteria, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the impairment measurement date. For other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities that do not meet either of these two criteria, the net amount recognized in earnings is equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows, discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. Any difference between the fair value and the net present value of the debt security at the impairment measurement date is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).” Prior to the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings for debt securities was equal to the total difference between amortized cost and fair value at the impairment measurement date. The other-than-temporary impairment charged to earnings is reflected within “Realized investment gains (losses), net” in the statement of operations and is included in income from continuing operations under U.S. GAAP but excluded from adjusted operating income. The level of impairment losses can be expected to increase when economic conditions worsen and decrease when economic conditions improve. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses” for a discussion of the effects of impairments on our operating results for the periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

For a further discussion of our policies regarding other-than-temporary declines in investment value and the related methodology for recording fixed maturity other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Other-than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities” below. For a further discussion of our policies regarding other-than-temporary declines in investment value and the related methodology for recording equity impairments, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments —General Account Investments—Equity Securities—Other-than-Temporary Impairments of Equity Securities” below.

Valuation of Commercial Mortgage Loans

Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” we elected the fair value option for certain loans held within the commercial mortgage operations of the asset management segment. Specifically, the fair value option was elected for funded commercial mortgage loans held for sale that were originated beginning January 1, 2008. In addition, we elected the fair value option for fixed rate commercial mortgage loans held for investment that were held at December 31, 2007 and for such loans originated beginning January 1, 2008. We elected the fair value option for the loan programs mentioned above primarily to eliminate the need for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, while still achieving an offset in earnings from the associated interest rate derivative hedges.

167

Due to volatility in the credit markets, we experienced unexpected volatility in the fair value of the aforementioned fixed rate commercial mortgage loans held for investment that was not substantially offset by the associated interest rate derivative hedges during the quarter ended June 30, 2008. Therefore, we decided to no longer elect the fair value option on loans held for investment that were originated after June 30, 2008, and have applied hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133.

The fair value of loans held for investment and accounted for using the Fair Value Option discussed above is determined based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the appropriate U.S. Treasury rate, adjusted for the current market spread for similar quality loans. Since the interest rate and market spread assumptions for similar quality loans are generally observable based upon market transactions, the fair value of loans held for investment has been reflected within Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of loans held for sale and accounted for using the Fair Value Option discussed above, as well as those loans reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis accounted for using the lower of cost or market approach is determined utilizing pricing indicators from the whole loan markets, which we consider our principal exit markets for these loans. We have evaluated the valuation inputs used for these assets, including the terms of the loans, prevailing interest rates and credit risk, and deemed that the primary pricing inputs are Level 2 for the loans held for sale accounted for using the Fair Value Option and are Level 3 for loans reported at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Valuation of Other Long-Term Investments

Other long-term investments carried at fair value include limited partnerships which we consolidate because we are either deemed to exercise control or are considered the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. These entities are considered investment companies and follow specialized industry accounting whereby their assets are carried at fair value. The investments held by these entities include various feeder fund investments in underlying master funds (whose underlying holdings generally include public fixed maturities and equity securities), as well as wholly-owned real estate held within other investment funds.

The fair value of wholly-owned real estate held in consolidated investment funds is determined through an independent appraisal process. The appraisals generally utilize a discounted cash flow model, following an income approach, that incorporates various assumptions including rental revenue, operating expenses and discount rates. These appraisals and the related assumptions are updated at least annually, and incorporate historical property experience and any observable market data, including any market transactions. Since many of the assumptions utilized are unobservable and are considered to be significant inputs to the valuation, the real estate investments within other long-term investments have been reflected within Level 3 in our fair value hierarchy. Consolidated real estate investment funds classified as Level 3 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 totaled approximately $0.5 billion and $1.0 billion respectively. Our direct investment in these funds is not material, and the majority of the assets recorded as a result of the consolidation of these funds is offset by a noncontrolling interest reflected as a separate component of equity, which amount is not considered to be fair value and therefore, not included in fair value reporting above.

168

Valuation of Derivative Instruments

Derivatives are recorded at fair value either as assets, within “Other trading account assets,” or “Other long-term investments,” or as liabilities, within “Other liabilities,” except for embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host contract. The fair values of derivative contracts are determined based on quoted prices in active exchanges or through the use of valuation models. The fair values of derivative contracts can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, credit spreads, market volatility, expected returns, non-performance risk and liquidity as well as other factors. Liquidity valuation adjustments are made to reflect the cost of exiting significant risk positions, and consider the bid-ask spread, maturity, complexity, and other specific attributes of the underlying derivative position. Fair values can also be affected by changes in estimates and assumptions including those related to counterparty behavior used in valuation models.

Our over-the-counter, or OTC, derivative contracts are executed under master netting agreements with counterparties with a Credit Support Annex, or CSA, which is a bilateral ratings-sensitive agreement that requires collateral postings at established credit threshold levels. These agreements protect our interest, as well as those of our counterparties, should either party suffer a credit rating deterioration. The vast majority of our derivative agreements are with highly rated major international financial institutions. Consistent with the practice of major international financial institutions, we use the credit spread embedded in the LIBOR interest rate curve to reflect non-performance risk when determining the fair value of our derivative assets and liabilities. We believe this credit spread is an appropriate estimate of the non-performance risk for derivative related assets and liabilities between highly rated institutions after consideration of the impacts of the collateral posting process.

Our exchange-traded futures and options include treasury futures, Eurodollar futures, commodity futures, Eurodollar options and commodity options. Exchange-traded futures and options are valued using quoted prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1 in our fair value hierarchy.

The majority of our derivative positions are traded in the OTC derivative market and are classified within Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy. OTC derivatives classified within Level 2 are valued using models generally accepted in the financial services industry that use actively quoted or observable market input values from external market data providers, non-binding broker-dealer quotations, third-party pricing vendors and/or recent trading activity. The fair values of most OTC derivatives, including interest rate and cross currency swaps, currency forward contracts, commodity swaps, commodity forward contracts, single name credit default swaps, loan commitments held for sale and to-be-announced (or TBA) forward contracts on highly rated mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government sponsored entities are determined using discounted cash flow models. The fair values of European style option contracts are determined using Black-Scholes option pricing models. These models’ key assumptions include the contractual terms of the respective contract, along with significant observable inputs, including interest rates, currency rates, credit spreads, yield curves, equity prices, index dividend yields, non-performance risk and volatility.

Most OTC derivative contracts have bid and ask prices that are actively quoted or can be readily obtained from external market data providers. Our policy is to use mid-market pricing consistent with our best estimate of fair value. The bid-ask spreads for derivatives classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are generally wider than derivatives classified within Level 2 thus requiring more judgment in estimating the mid-market price of such derivatives. The fair values of OTC derivative assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 totaled approximately $0.9 billion and $79 million as of June 30, 2009 and $1.3 billion and $140 million as of December 31, 2008, respectively, without giving consideration to the impact of netting.

169

individual credit default spreads, interest rates, recovery rates and unobservable model-specific input values such as correlation between different credits within the same basket. Look-back equity options and other structured options and derivatives are valued using simulation models such as the Monte Carlo technique. The input values for look-back equity options are derived from observable market indices such as interest rates, dividend yields, equity indices as well as unobservable model-specific input values such as certain volatility parameters. Level 3 methodologies are validated through periodic comparison of our fair values to broker-dealer’s values.

All realized and unrealized changes in fair value of non-dealer related derivatives, with the exception of the effective portion of qualifying cash flow hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations, are recorded in current earnings. Generally, the changes in fair value of such non-dealer related derivatives, excluding those that qualify for hedge accounting, are recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” For additional information regarding the impact of changes in fair value of derivative instruments on our results of operations see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses” below.

We hold externally-managed investments in the European market, as discussed in greater detail under “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities.” These investments are valued using market observable inputs including benchmark yields and reported trades and are classified as Level 2 for fair value reporting. The fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with these investments increased during the second quarter of 2009 due to the impact of credit spread tightening on the underlying investments. As of June 30, 2009 the embedded derivatives remain in a loss position on a cumulative basis as a result of the stress experienced in the credit markets. However, we believe the investment fundamentals remain sound, and the ultimate value that will be realized from these investments is greater than reflected by the current fair value of the embedded derivatives.

Valuation of Variable Annuity Optional Living Benefit Features

Our liability for future policy benefits includes general account liabilities for guarantees on variable annuity contracts, including guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMAB”), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) and guaranteed minimum income and withdrawal benefits (“GMIWB”). While these guarantees primarily relate to the optional living benefit features of our Individual Annuities segment, they are also included in certain variable annuities in our International Insurance segment and certain retirement account based group variable annuities in our Retirement segment. These benefits are accounted for as embedded derivatives and are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”

170

discount rate used in the valuations of the embedded derivatives associated with our optional living benefit features, thereby increasing the discount rate and reducing the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities. The additional spread over LIBOR is determined taking into consideration publicly available information relating to the claims-paying ability of our insurance subsidiaries, as indicated by the credit spreads associated with funding agreements issued by these subsidiaries. We adjust these credit spreads to remove any liquidity risk premium. In the second quarter of 2009 we reduced the non-performance risk adjustment, resulting in a pre-tax charge of $660 million in our Individual Annuities segment and $16 million in our Retirement segment. The reduction in the non-performance risk adjustment was primarily driven by the overall decrease in the embedded derivative liabilities due to a decrease in future expected benefit payments, which resulted from an increase in policyholder account balances due to market appreciation and higher interest rates. A decrease in the additional spread over LIBOR we used in the second quarter of 2009, reflecting general credit spread tightening and our stronger capital position resulting from our equity raise, also contributed to the reduction in our market-perceived non-performance risk. The additional spread over forward LIBOR rates incorporated into the discount rate as of June 30, 2009 generally ranged from 100 to 200 basis points for the portion of the interest rate curve most relevant to these liabilities. For the first six months of 2009, our adjustment for the market’s perception of our non-performance risk resulted in a $559 million pre-tax benefit to our Individual Annuities segment and a $7 million pre-tax benefit to our Retirement segment.

Other significant inputs to the valuation models include capital market assumptions, such as interest rate and implied volatility assumptions, as well as various policyholder behavior assumptions that are actuarially determined, including lapse rates, benefit utilization rates, mortality rates and withdrawal rates. These assumptions are reviewed at least annually, and updated based upon historical experience and give consideration to any observable market data, including market transactions such as acquisitions and reinsurance transactions. In the first quarter of 2009 we further updated our volatility assumptions for our Individual Annuities segment to reflect the inclusion of new market inputs. We no longer solely utilize the implied volatility of over-the-counter equity options, but a blend of these implied volatilities and an index based on historical volatilities. This update to our volatility assumption, which resulted in a reduction in the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with our optional living benefit features, resulted in a $92 million pre-tax benefit to our Individual Annuities segment in the first six months of 2009.

Since many of the assumptions utilized in the valuation of the embedded derivatives associated with our optional living benefit features are unobservable and are considered to be significant inputs to the liability valuation, the liability included in future policy benefits has been reflected within Level 3 in our fair value hierarchy. The change in fair value of the GMAB, GMWB and GMIWB resulted in a decrease in the total liability of $1,020 million and $2,433 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2009, respectively, primarily reflecting a decrease in future expected benefit payments, resulting from an increase in policyholder account balance due to market appreciation and higher interest rates, and the update of our market-perceived non-performance risk assumption discussed above. These changes were significantly offset by increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition and other costs, and changes in value of related hedging instruments, primarily in our Individual Annuities segment as described in more detail under “—Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment—U.S. Retirement Solutions and Investment Management Division—Individual Annuities.”

Valuation of Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt carried at fair value includes funding received from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on a non-recourse basis to finance the purchase of eligible asset-backed securities, under TALF. We value these liabilities using various inputs including the value of the collateral (eligible asset-backed securities), a comparison of the liabilities’ spread over LIBOR to the spreads in current TALF offerings and various other market observable and non-observable inputs which incorporate significant management judgment. As a result, the pricing of the non-recourse liabilities have been classified within Level 3 in our fair value hierarchy. The pricing of the collateral assets (“other trading account assets” is generally based on third party pricing information as discussed above, and included in Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy. See Note 9 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our participation in TALF.

171

Valuation of Other Assets and Other Liabilities

Other assets carried at fair value include U.S. Treasury bills held within our global commodities group whose fair values are determined consistent with similar securities described above under “—Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities.” Included in other liabilities are various derivatives contracts executed within our global commodities group, including exchange-traded futures, foreign currency and commodity contracts. The fair values of these derivative instruments are determined consistent with similar derivative instruments described above under “—Valuation of Derivative Instruments.”

Valuation of Trading Account Assets

Trading account assets, including trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, consist primarily of public corporate bonds, treasuries, equity securities and derivatives whose fair values are determined consistent with similar instruments described above in “—Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities,” “—Valuation of Equity Securities” and “—Valuation of Derivative Instruments.” Other trading account assets also includes collateral assets we hold under TALF, as described above in “—Valuation of Long-Term Debt.”

Valuation of Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments

Cash equivalents and short-term investments carried at fair value include money market instruments, commercial paper and other highly liquid debt instruments. Money market instruments are generally valued using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to us for identical assets and are primarily classified as Level 1. The remaining instruments in the Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments category are typically not traded in active markets; however, their fair values are based on market observable inputs and, accordingly, these investments have been classified within Level 2 in our fair value hierarchy.

Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments

Realized Investment Gains and Losses

Realized investment gains and losses are generated from numerous sources, including the sale of fixed maturity securities, equity securities, investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships and other types of investments, as well as adjustments to the cost basis of investments for other-than-temporary impairments. Realized investment gains and losses are also generated from prepayment premiums received on private fixed maturity securities, recoveries of principal on previously impaired securities, provisions for losses on commercial mortgage and other loans, fair value changes on commercial mortgage operations’ loans, fair value changes on embedded derivatives and derivatives, except those derivatives that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment and those derivatives used in our capacity as a broker or dealer.

We perform quarterly impairment reviews to determine when a decline in value is other-than-temporary. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, we consistently consider several factors including, but not limited to, the following: (1) the extent and duration of the decline in value; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency, or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. In addition, under FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments,” which we adopted effective January 1, 2009, an other-than-temporary impairment must be recognized for a debt security if we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. With regard to available-for-sale equity securities, we also consider the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value.

172

When it is determined that a decline in value of an equity security is other-than-temporary, the carrying value of the equity security is impaired to its fair value, with a corresponding charge to “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” Under FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, when an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” depends on whether we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the debt security meets either of these two criteria, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the impairment measurement date. For other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities that do not meet either of these two criteria, the net amount recognized in earnings is equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows, discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. Any difference between the fair value and the net present value of the debt security at the impairment measurement date is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).”

Prior to our adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, we were required to recognize an other-than-temporary impairment for a debt security unless we could assert that we had both the intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in the debt security’s fair value to its amortized cost basis. In light of market conditions and liquidity concerns, beginning in the third quarter of 2008, our determinations of whether the decline in value of a debt security was other-than-temporary placed greater emphasis on our internal analysis of the underlying credit and our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value, versus the extent and duration of a decline in fair value. When we determined that there was an other-than-temporary impairment, we wrote down the carrying value of the debt security to its fair value, with a corresponding charge recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” For a further discussion of our policies regarding other-than-temporary declines in investment value and the related methodology for recording fixed maturity other-than-temporary impairments, see “—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Other-than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities” below. For a further discussion of our policies regarding other-than-temporary declines in investment value and the related methodology for recording equity impairments, see “—General Account Investments—Equity Securities—Other-than-Temporary Impairments of Equity Securities” below.

The level of other-than-temporary impairments generally reflects economic conditions and is expected to increase when economic conditions worsen and to decrease when economic conditions improve. Historically, the causes of other-than-temporary impairments have been specific to each individual issuer and have not directly resulted in impairments to other securities within the same industry or geographic region. However, as discussed in more detail below, certain of the other-than-temporary impairments recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 relate to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages and reflect the overall deterioration of the housing market. We may realize additional credit and interest rate related losses through sales of investments pursuant to our credit risk and portfolio management objectives. In light of unprecedented market conditions, and in consideration of the potential impact on capital and tax positions, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 we temporarily curtailed the active trading policy of certain portfolios. In the second quarter of 2009, we resumed a more restricted active trading program in these portfolios. Other-than-temporary impairments, interest rate related losses and credit losses (other than those related to certain of our businesses which primarily originate investments for sale or syndication to unrelated investors) are excluded from adjusted operating income. In periods subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment, the impaired security is accounted for as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. For debt securities, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis may be accreted into net investment income, and included in adjusted operating income in future periods based on prospective changes in cash flow estimates, to reflect adjustments to the effective yield.

We require most issuers of private fixed maturity securities to pay us make-whole yield maintenance payments when they prepay the securities. Prepayments are driven by factors specific to the activities of our borrowers as well as the interest rate environment.

173

We use interest rate and currency swaps and other derivatives to manage interest and currency exchange rate exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities, including duration mismatches. We use derivative contracts to mitigate the risk that unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates will reduce U.S. dollar equivalent earnings generated by certain of our non-U.S. businesses. We also use equity-based derivatives to hedge the equity risks embedded in some of our annuity products. Derivative contracts also include forward purchases and sales of to-be-announced mortgage-backed securities primarily related to our mortgage dollar roll program. Many of these derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, and, consequently, we recognize the changes in fair value of such contracts from period to period in current earnings, although we do not necessarily account for the related assets or liabilities the same way. Accordingly, realized investment gains and losses from our derivative activities can contribute significantly to fluctuations in net income.

Adjusted operating income excludes “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” (other than those representing profit or loss of certain of our businesses which primarily originate investments for sale or syndication to unrelated investors, and those associated with terminating hedges of foreign currency earnings, current period yield adjustments, or product derivatives and the effect of any related economic hedging program) and related charges and adjustments.

The following tables set forth “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” by investment type for the Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business, as well as related charges and adjustments associated with the Financial Services Businesses, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For a discussion of our general account investment portfolio and related results, including overall income yield and investment income, as well as our policies regarding other-than-temporary declines in investment value and the related methodology for recording impairment charges, see “—General Account Investments” below. For additional details regarding adjusted operating income, which is our measure of performance for the segments of our Financial Services Businesses, see Note 11 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(in millions)
Realized investment gains (losses), net:
Financial Services Businesses	$	(1,418	)	$	(550	)	$	(838	)	$	(1,352	)
Closed Block Business		(857	)		(348	)		(1,292	)		(458	)

Consolidated realized investment gains (losses), net	$	(2,275	)	$	(898	)	$	(2,130	)	$	(1,810	)

Financial Services Businesses:
Realized investment gains (losses), net
Fixed maturity securities(1)	$	(305	)	$	(490	)	$	(554	)	$	(888	)
Equity securities		(114	)		(97	)		(380	)		(153	)
Derivative instruments(2)		(804	)		88			383			(243	)
Other		(195	)		(51	)		(287	)		(68	)

Total		(1,418	)		(550	)		(838	)		(1,352	)
Related adjustments(3)		546			23			(744	)		160

Realized investment gains (losses), net, and related adjustments	$	(872	)	$	(527	)	$	(1,582	)	$	(1,192	)

Related charges(4)	$	(5	)	$	41		$	39		$	28

Closed Block Business:
Realized investment gains (losses), net
Fixed maturity securities(1)	$	(187	)	$	(187	)	$	(297	)	$	(215	)
Equity securities		(204	)		(113	)		(439	)		(206	)
Derivative instruments		(415	)		(42	)		(452	)		(28	)
Other		(51	)		(6	)		(104	)		(9	)

Total	$	(857	)	$	(348	)	$	(1,292	)	$	(458	)

174

(1)

The Financial Services Businesses include $209 million and $449 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $375 million and $665 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, related to other-than-temporary impairments of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. The Closed Block Business includes $100 million and $201 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $166 million and $279 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, related to other-than-temporary impairments of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages.

(2)

The Financial Services Businesses include $144 million and $6 million of gains in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $22 million of gains and $186 million of losses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, related to embedded derivatives associated with certain externally managed investments in the European market.

(3)

Related adjustments include that portion of “Realized investment gains (losses), net,” that are included in adjusted operating income, including those pertaining to certain derivative contracts, as well as those that represent profit or loss of certain of our businesses which primarily originate investments for sale or syndication to unrelated investors. Related adjustments also include that portion of “Asset management fees and other income” that are excluded from adjusted operating income, including the change in value due to the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates during the period on certain assets and liabilities for which we economically hedge the foreign currency exposure as well as counterparty credit losses on derivative positions. See Note 11 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these related adjustments.

(4)	Reflects charges that are related to realized investment gains (losses), net, and excluded from adjusted operating income, as described more fully in Note 11 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

2009 to 2008 Three Month Comparison

Financial Services Businesses

The Financial Services Businesses’ net realized investment losses in the second quarter of 2009 were $1,418 million, compared to net realized investment losses of $550 million in the second quarter of 2008.

Net realized losses on fixed maturity securities were $305 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared to net realized losses of $490 million in the second quarter of 2008, as set forth in the following table:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	(in millions)
Realized investment gains (losses)—Fixed Maturity Securities—Financial Services Businesses
Gross realized investment gains:
Gross gains on sales and maturities	$	233		$	71
Private bond prepayment premiums		1			7

Total gross realized investment gains		234			78

Gross realized investment losses:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(875	)		(452	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in OCI(1)		548			—

Net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings		(327	)		(452	)
Gross losses on sales and maturities(2)		(186	)		(103	)
Credit related losses on sales		(26	)		(13	)

Total gross realized investment losses		(539	)		(568	)

Realized investment gains (losses), net—Fixed Maturity Securities	$	(305	)	$	(490	)

Net gains (losses) on sales and maturities—Fixed Maturity Investments(2)	$	47		$	(32	)

(1)	Represents the difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment that is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).”

(2)	Amounts exclude credit related losses through sales of investments pursuant to our credit risk and portfolio management objectives.

175

Net trading gains on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $47 million in the second quarter of 2009 were primarily due to sales within our Individual Annuities segment and sales of government bonds in our Gibraltar Life operations. Sales of fixed maturity securities in our Individual Annuities segment were primarily due to transfers of investments out of our general account and into separate accounts relating to an automatic rebalancing element embedded in the living benefit features of some of our variable annuity products. None of the gross losses on sales and maturities in the second quarter of 2009 related to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. Gross losses on sales and maturities of fixed maturity investments of $103 million in the second quarter of 2008, were primarily related to credit spread increases in the credit markets resulting generally from concerns over the economic slowdown, and interest rates. None of the gross losses on sales and maturities in the second quarter of 2008 related to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. See “—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities” for additional information regarding our exposure to sub-prime mortgages. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity securities in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized losses on equity securities were $114 million in the second quarter of 2009, of which other-than-temporary impairments were $64 million and net trading losses on sales of equity securities were $50 million. Net trading losses were primarily due to sales within our Gibraltar Life operations. Net realized losses on equity securities were $97 million in the second quarter of 2008, of which other-than-temporary impairments were $95 million and net trading losses on sales of equity securities were $2 million. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized losses on derivatives were $804 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared to net realized gains of $88 million in the second quarter of 2008. The net derivative losses in the second quarter of 2009 primarily reflect net losses of $488 million on embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with certain variable annuity contracts. These losses were primarily driven by a reduction in our adjustment to reflect our market perceived non-performance risk in the fair value of the embedded derivatives. For additional information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with our living benefit features, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Variable Annuity Optional Living Benefit Features.” Also contributing to the net derivative losses in the second quarter of 2009 were net mark-to-market losses of $273 million on interest rate derivatives used to manage duration and net losses of $65 million on futures contracts used to hedge foreign equity securities. Also contributing to the net realized losses are net losses of $67 million on currency derivatives used to hedge foreign denominated investments and net losses of $62 million on foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge the future income of non-U.S. businesses due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar. Partially offsetting these losses were net mark-to-market gains of $144 million on embedded derivatives associated with certain externally managed investments in the European market and net gains of $63 million on credit derivatives as credit spreads narrowed. The net derivative gains in the second quarter of 2008 primarily reflect positive mark-to-market adjustments of $168 million on foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge the future income of non-U.S. businesses, due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. Also contributing to the net derivative gains in the second quarter of 2008 were net gains of $93 million on credit derivatives, primarily relating to credit derivatives used to hedge our exposures to certain monoline bond insurers. Partially offsetting these gains were net mark-to-market losses of $188 million on interest rate derivatives used to manage the duration of the fixed maturity investment portfolio, as interest rates rose. For information regarding our externally managed investments in the European market, see “—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities.” For information regarding our methodology for determining the fair value of our derivative instruments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Derivative Instruments.”

Net realized losses on other investments were $195 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily related to $138 million of commercial mortgage and other loan loss reserves. The remaining $57 million of net realized

176

losses on other investments was primarily driven by mark-to-market losses on mortgage loans within our divested commercial mortgage securitization operations and losses on real estate related joint ventures in our asset management operations, as well as other-than-temporary impairments on real estate investments. Net realized losses on other investments were $51 million in the second quarter of 2008, primarily related to mark-to-market losses on mortgage loans within our divested commercial mortgage securitization operations due to instability in the commercial real estate market during 2008. For additional information regarding our commercial mortgage and other loan loss reserves see “—General Account Investments—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loan Quality.”

During the second quarter of 2009 we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $418 million in earnings, compared to total other-than-temporary impairments of $553 million recorded in earnings in the second quarter of 2008. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the composition of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings attributable to the Financial Services Businesses by asset type, and for fixed maturity securities, by reason.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings—Financial Services Businesses(1)
Public fixed maturity securities	$	267	$	435
Private fixed maturity securities		60		17

Total fixed maturity securities		327		452
Equity securities		64		95
Other invested assets(2)		27		6

Total	$	418	$	553

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)	Includes other-than-temporary impairments relating to investment real estate and investments in joint ventures and partnerships.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized By Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Financial Services Businesses(1)
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(2)	$	197	$	71	$	268
Due to other accounting guidelines(3)		12		47		59

Total	$	209	$	118	$	327

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)

Represents circumstances where we believe credit events or other adverse conditions of the respective issuers have caused, or will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. The amount of the impairment recorded in earnings is the difference between the amortized cost of the debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment.

(3)	Primarily represents circumstances where we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.

177


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized By Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Financial Services Businesses
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(1)	$	23	$	25	$	48
Due to other accounting guidelines(2)		352		52		404

Total	$	375	$	77	$	452

(1)

Represents circumstances where we believe credit events or other adverse conditions of the respective issuers have caused, or will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. In certain of these circumstances the decrease in fair value, at the time the impairment was recorded, was partially driven by general credit spread widening or liquidity concerns and we believe the recoverable value of the investment, based on the expected future cash flows, is greater than the current fair value.

(2)

Includes certain circumstances relating to asset-backed securities with a credit rating below AA, where the present value of prospective cash flows of the security have declined, but we do not believe credit events or other adverse conditions of the respective issuers have caused a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. Also includes circumstances where we cannot assert our ability or intent to hold for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. In certain of these circumstances the decrease in fair value, at the time the impairment was recorded, was driven primarily by general credit spread widening or liquidity concerns, and we believe the recoverable value of the investment, based on the expected future cash flows, is greater than the current fair value.

Fixed maturity other-than-temporary impairments in the second quarter of 2009 were concentrated in asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, and the manufacturing and service sectors of our corporate securities, and were primarily driven by liquidity concerns, downgrades in credit, bankruptcy or other adverse financial conditions of the respective issuers, which have caused, or we believe will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. Equity security other-than-temporary impairments in the second quarter of 2009 were primarily in our Japanese insurance operations equity portfolio. Other-than-temporary impairments of other investments in the second quarter of 2009 were mainly related to investment real estate. Fixed maturity other-than-temporary impairments in the second quarter of 2008 were concentrated in asset-backed securities and the finance and manufacturing sectors of our corporate securities, and were primarily driven by credit spread increases as discussed above, liquidity concerns, downgrades in credit, bankruptcy or other adverse financial conditions of the respective issuers. For information regarding the fair value methodology used in determining our other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities,” and “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Equity Securities.”

178

Closed Block Business

For the Closed Block Business, net realized investment losses in the second quarter of 2009 were $857 million, compared to net realized investment losses of $348 million in the second quarter of 2008.

Net realized losses on fixed maturity securities were $187 million in both the second quarter of 2009 and the second quarter of 2008, as set forth in the following table:


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	(in millions)
Realized investment gains (losses)—Fixed Maturity Securities—Closed Block Business
Gross realized investment gains:
Gross gains on sales and maturities	$	30		$	109
Private bond prepayment premiums		2			7

Total gross realized investment gains		32			116

Gross realized investment losses:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(437	)		(209	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in OCI(1)		265			—

Net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings		(172	)		(209	)
Gross losses on sales and maturities(2)		(47	)		(93	)
Credit related losses on sales		—			(1	)

Total gross realized investment losses		(219	)		(303	)

Realized investment gains (losses), net—Fixed Maturity Securities	$	(187	)	$	(187	)

Net gains (losses) on sales and maturities—Fixed Maturity Investments(2)	$	(17	)	$	16

(1)	Represents the difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment that is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).”

(2)	Amounts exclude credit related losses through sales of investments pursuant to our credit risk and portfolio management objectives.

Net losses on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $17 million in the second quarter of 2009 were primarily due to sales related to our total return strategy. Gross losses on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $47 million in the second quarter of 2009, declined in comparison to $93 million of such losses in the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to the restriction of our active trading policies, as discussed below. There were no gross losses on sales or maturities in the second quarter of 2009 or the second quarter of 2008 related to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. In light of unprecedented market conditions and in consideration of the potential impact on capital and tax positions, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 we curtailed our active trading policy. In the second quarter of 2009, we resumed a more restricted active trading program in these portfolios. These restrictions resulted in a lower level of realized gains and losses in this portfolio than might otherwise have been incurred. Net gains on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $16 million in the second quarter of 2008 were also primarily due to sales related to our total return strategy. See “—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities” for additional information regarding our exposure to sub-prime mortgages. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity securities in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized losses on equity securities were $204 million in the second quarter of 2009, including other-than-temporary impairments of $199 million and net trading losses on sales of equity securities of $5 million. Net realized losses on equity securities were $113 million in the second quarter of 2008, of which other-than-temporary impairments were $135 million, partially offset by net trading gains on sales of equity securities of

179

$22 million. Results for both periods reflect sales pursuant to our total return strategy, which remained partially restricted for the second quarter of 2009, as discussed above. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized losses on derivatives were $415 million in the second quarter of 2009, compared to net realized losses of $42 million in the second quarter of 2008. Derivative losses in the second quarter of 2009 primarily reflect net mark-to-market losses of $307 million on interest rate derivatives used to manage duration and net losses of $119 million related to currency derivatives used to hedge foreign denominated investments. Derivative losses in the second quarter of 2008 primarily reflect net mark-to-market losses of $72 million on interest rate derivatives used to manage the duration of the fixed maturity investment portfolio partially offset by net gains of $25 million on credit derivatives used to hedge credit exposure in our investment portfolio. For information regarding our methodology for determining the fair value of our derivative instruments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Derivative Instruments.”

Net realized losses on other investments were $51 million in the second quarter of 2009, primarily related to $35 million in commercial mortgage and other loan loss reserves and $16 million of other-than-temporary impairments on joint ventures and partnerships. Net realized investment losses on other investments were $6 million in the second quarter of 2008, primarily related to impairments on joint ventures and partnerships. For additional information regarding our commercial mortgage and other loan loss reserves see “—General Account Investments—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loan Quality.”

During the second quarter of 2009 we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $387 million in earnings, compared to other-than-temporary impairments of $349 million recorded in earnings in the second quarter of 2008. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the composition of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings attributable to the Closed Block Business by asset type, and for fixed maturity securities, by reason.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings—Closed Block Business(1)
Public fixed maturity securities	$	144	$	187
Private fixed maturity securities		28		22

Total fixed maturity securities		172		209
Equity securities		199		135
Other invested assets(2)		16		5

Total	$	387	$	349

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)	Includes other-than-temporary impairments relating to investments in joint ventures and partnerships.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized by Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Closed Block Business(1)
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(2)	$	99	$	72	$	171
Due to other accounting guidelines(3)		1		—		1

Total	$	100	$	72	$	172

180

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)

(3)	Primarily represents circumstances where we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized by Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Closed Block Business
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(1)	$	5	$	17	$	22
Due to other accounting guidelines(2)		161		26		187

Total	$	166	$	43	$	209

(1)

Represents circumstances where we believe credit events or other adverse conditions of the respective issuers have caused, or will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. In certain of these circumstances the decrease in the fair value, at the time the impairment was recorded, was partially driven by general credit spread widening or liquidity concerns and we believe the recoverable value of the investment, based on the expected future cash flows, is greater than the current fair value.

(2)

Equity security other-than-temporary impairments in the second quarter of 2009 and 2008 were primarily driven by overall declines in the equity markets. For information regarding the fair value methodology used in determining our other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities,” and “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Equity Securities.”

181

2009 to 2008 Six Month Comparison

Financial Services Businesses

The Financial Services Businesses’ net realized investment losses in the first six months of 2009 were $838 million, compared to net realized investment losses of $1,352 million in the first six months of 2008.

Net realized losses on fixed maturity securities were $554 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to net realized losses of $888 million in the first six months of 2008, as set forth in the following table:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	(in millions)
Realized investment gains (losses)—Fixed Maturity Securities—Financial Services Businesses
Gross realized investment gains:
Gross gains on sales and maturities	$	513		$	149
Private bond prepayment premiums		1			9

Total gross realized investment gains		514			158

Gross realized investment losses:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(1,957	)		(840	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in OCI(1)		1,206			—

Net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings		(751	)		(840	)
Gross losses on sales and maturities(2)		(250	)		(170	)
Credit related losses on sales		(67	)		(36	)

Total gross realized investment losses		(1,068	)		(1,046	)

Realized investment gains (losses), net—Fixed Maturity Securities	$	(554	)	$	(888	)

Net gains (losses) on sales and maturities—Fixed Maturity Investments(2)	$	263		$	(21	)

(1)	Represents the difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment that is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).”

(2)	Amounts exclude credit related losses through sales of investments pursuant to our credit risk and portfolio management objectives.

Net trading gains on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $263 million in the first six months of 2009 were primarily due to sales of government bonds in our Gibraltar Life and Japanese Life Planner operations and sales within our Individual Annuities segment. Sales of fixed maturity securities in our Individual Annuities segment were primarily due to transfers of investments out of our general account and into separate accounts relating to an automatic rebalancing element embedded in the living benefit features of some of our variable annuity products. None of the gross losses on sales and maturities in the first six months of 2009 related to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. Gross losses on sales and maturities of fixed maturity investments of $170 million in the first six months of 2008, were primarily related to credit spread increases in the credit markets resulting generally from concerns over sub-prime mortgage exposures, and interest rates. None of the gross losses on sales and maturities in the first six months of 2008 related to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. See “—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities” for additional information regarding our exposure to sub-prime mortgages. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity securities in the first six months of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized losses on equity securities were $380 million in the first six months of 2009, of which other-than-temporary impairments were $317 million and net trading losses on sales of equity securities were $63 million. Net trading losses were primarily due to sales within our Gibraltar Life operations. Net realized losses on

182

equity securities were $153 million in the first six months of 2008, of which other-than-temporary impairments were $143 million and net trading losses on sales of equity securities were $10 million. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities in the first six months of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized gains on derivatives were $383 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to net realized losses of $243 million in the first six months of 2008. The net derivative gains in the first six months of 2009 primarily reflect net gains of $858 million on embedded derivatives and related hedge positions associated with certain variable annuity contracts. These gains were driven by a market-perceived increase in our own risk of non-performance. For additional information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with our living benefit features, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Variable Annuity Optional Living Benefit Features.” Also contributing to the net derivative gains in the first six months of 2009 were net mark-to-market gains of $140 million on foreign currency forward contracts used to hedge the future income of non-U.S. businesses. Partially offsetting these gains were net mark-to-market losses of $513 million on interest rate derivatives used to manage duration, and net losses of $113 million on currency derivatives used to hedge foreign denominated investments. Net mark-to-market losses on interest rate derivatives used to manage duration includes the impact of long-duration floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps we entered into in order to add duration exposure to our Japanese investment portfolio.

Based on an evaluation of recent market conditions, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing into the first quarter of 2009, we terminated or offset many of these interest rate swaps in consideration of, among other things, the interest rate environment. We continue to manage the interest rate risk profile of our businesses in the context of market conditions and relative opportunities, and we expect to resume implementing strategies to lengthen the duration of our Japanese investment portfolio as our assessment of market conditions changes. The net derivative losses in the first six months of 2008 primarily reflect net mark-to-market losses of $186 million on embedded derivatives associated with certain externally managed investments in the European market and net mark-to-market losses of $88 million on interest rate derivatives used to manage the duration of the fixed maturity investment portfolio. Also contributing to the net derivative losses in 2008 were net losses of $46 million on embedded derivatives within certain domestic variable annuity contracts, net of the effect of a related derivative hedging portfolio. Partially offsetting these losses were net gains of $85 million on credit derivatives, primarily relating to credit derivatives used to hedge our exposures to certain monoline bond insurers. For information regarding our externally managed investments in the European market, see “—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities.” For information regarding our methodology for determining the fair value of our derivative instruments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Derivative Instruments.”

Net realized losses on other investments were $287 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily related to $211 million of commercial mortgage and other loan loss reserves. The remaining $76 million of net realized losses on other investments was primarily driven by mark-to-market losses on mortgage loans within our divested commercial mortgage securitization operations and losses on real estate related joint ventures in our asset management operations, as well as other-than-temporary impairments on real estate investments. Net realized losses on other investments were $68 million in the first six months of 2008, primarily related to mark-to-market losses on mortgage loans within our divested commercial mortgage securitization operations due to instability in the commercial real estate market during 2008. For additional information regarding our commercial mortgage and other loan loss reserves see “—General Account Investments—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loan Quality.”

183

During the first six months of 2009 we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $1,096 million in earnings, compared to total other-than-temporary impairments of $990 million recorded in earnings in the first six months of 2008. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the composition of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings attributable to the Financial Services Businesses by asset type, and for fixed maturity securities, by reason.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings—Financial Services Businesses(1)
Public fixed maturity securities	$	654	$	812
Private fixed maturity securities		97		28

Total fixed maturity securities		751		840
Equity securities		317		143
Other invested assets(2)		28		7

Total	$	1,096	$	990

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)	Includes other-than-temporary impairments relating to investment real estate and investments in joint ventures and partnerships.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized By Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Financial Services Businesses(1)
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(2)	$	437	$	235	$	672
Due to other accounting guidelines(3)		12		67		79

Total	$	449	$	302	$	751

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)

(3)	Primarily represents circumstances where we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized By Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Financial Services Businesses
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(1)	$	69	$	43	$	112
Due to other accounting guidelines(2)		596		132		728

Total	$	665	$	175	$	840

184

(1)

Represents circumstances where we believe credit events or other adverse conditions of the respective issuers have caused, or will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. In certain of these circumstances the decrease in fair value, at the time the impairment was recorded, was partially driven by general credit spread widening or liquidity concerns and we believe the recoverable value of the investment, based on the expected future cash flows, is greater than the current fair value.

(2)

Fixed maturity other-than-temporary impairments in the first six months of 2009 were concentrated in asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, and the manufacturing and services sectors of our corporate securities, and were primarily driven by liquidity concerns, downgrades in credit, bankruptcy or other adverse financial conditions of the respective issuers, which have caused, or we believe will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. Equity security other-than-temporary impairments in the first six months of 2009 were primarily driven by overall declines in the Japanese equity markets and losses in our mutual fund shares representing our interest in high yield bond funds of certain of our separate account investments supporting corporate owned life insurance. Fixed maturity other-than-temporary impairments in the first six months of 2008 were concentrated in asset-backed securities and the finance, services, and manufacturing sectors of our corporate securities, and were primarily driven by credit spread increases as discussed above, liquidity concerns, downgrades in credit, bankruptcy or other adverse financial conditions of the respective issuers. For information regarding the fair value methodology used in determining our other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities,” and “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Equity Securities.”

Closed Block Business

For the Closed Block Business, net realized investment losses in the first six months of 2009 were $1,292 million, compared to net realized investment losses of $458 million in the first six months of 2008.

Net realized losses on fixed maturity securities were $297 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to net realized losses of $215 million in the first six months of 2008, as set forth in the following table:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008
	(in millions)
Realized investment gains (losses)—Fixed Maturity Securities—Closed Block Business
Gross realized investment gains:
Gross gains on sales and maturities	$	113		$	325
Private bond prepayment premiums		2			8

Total gross realized investment gains		115			333

Gross realized investment losses:
Total other-than-temporary impairments		(1,210	)		(360	)
Portion of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in OCI(1)		857			—

Net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings		(353	)		(360	)
Gross losses on sales and maturities(2)		(54	)		(161	)
Credit related losses on sales		(5	)		(27	)

Total gross realized investment losses		(412	)		(548	)

Realized investment gains (losses), net—Fixed Maturity Securities	$	(297	)	$	(215	)

Net gains (losses) on sales and maturities—Fixed Maturity Investments(2)	$	59		$	164

185

(1)	Represents the difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment that is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).”

(2)	Amounts exclude credit related losses through sales of investments pursuant to our credit risk and portfolio management objectives.

Net gains on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $59 million in the first six months of 2009 were primarily due to sales related to our total return strategy. Gross losses on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $54 million in the first six months of 2009, declined in comparison to $161 million of such losses in the first six months of 2008, primarily due to the restriction of our active trading policies, as discussed below. There were no gross losses on sales or maturities in the first six months of 2009 or the first six months of 2008 related to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. In light of the unprecedented market conditions and in consideration of the potential impact on capital and tax positions, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008 we curtailed our active trading policy. In the second quarter of 2009, we resumed a more restricted active trading program in these portfolios. These restrictions resulted in a lower level of realized gains and losses in this portfolio than might otherwise have been incurred. Net gains on sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities of $164 million in the first six months of 2008 were also primarily due to sales related to our total return strategy. See “—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities” for additional information regarding our exposure to sub-prime mortgages. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity securities in the first six months of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized losses on equity securities of $439 million in the first six months of 2009 were comprised entirely of other-than-temporary impairments. Net realized losses on equity securities were $206 million in the first six months of 2008, of which other-than-temporary impairments were $187 million, and net trading losses on sales of equity securities were $19 million. Net trading losses for the first six months of 2008 reflect sales pursuant to our active management strategy, which was curtailed or partially restricted for the first six months of 2009, as discussed above. See below for additional information regarding the other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities in the first six months of 2009 and 2008.

Net realized losses on derivatives were $452 million in the first six months of 2009, compared to net realized losses of $28 million in the first six months of 2008. Derivative losses in the first six months of 2009 primarily reflect net mark-to-market losses of $394 million on interest rate derivatives used to manage duration and net losses of $82 million related to currency derivatives used to hedge foreign denominated investments. Derivative losses in the first six months of 2008 primarily reflect net mark-to-market losses of $84 million on currency derivatives used to hedge foreign investments, partially offset by gains of $44 million on credit derivatives used to hedge credit exposure in our investment portfolio. For information regarding our methodology for determining the fair value of our derivative instruments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Derivative Instruments.”

Net realized losses on other investments were $104 million in the first six months of 2009, primarily related to $68 million of commercial mortgage loan loss reserves and $38 million of other-than-temporary impairments on joint ventures and partnerships. Net realized investment losses on other investments were $9 million in the first six months of 2008, primarily related to impairments on joint ventures and partnerships. For additional information regarding our commercial mortgage and other loan loss reserves see “—General Account Investments—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans—Commercial Mortgage and Other Loan Quality.”

186

During the first six months of 2009 we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $830 million in earnings, compared to other-than-temporary impairments of $553 million recorded in earnings in the first six months of 2008. The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the composition of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings attributable to the Closed Block Business by asset type, and for fixed maturity securities, by reason.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings—Closed Block Business(1)
Public fixed maturity securities	$	321	$	336
Private fixed maturity securities		32		24

Total fixed maturity securities		353		360
Equity securities		439		187
Other invested assets(2)		38		6

Total	$	830	$	553

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)	Includes other-than-temporary impairments relating to investments in joint ventures and partnerships.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized by Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Closed Block Business(1)
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(2)	$	200	$	150	$	350
Due to other accounting guidelines(3)		1		2		3

Total	$	201	$	152	$	353

(1)	Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment.

(2)

(3)	Primarily represents circumstances where we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized by Sub-Prime Mortgages		All Other Investments		Total
	(in millions)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities recorded in earnings—Closed Block Business
Due to credit events or adverse conditions of the respective issuer(1)	$	22	$	25	$	47
Due to other accounting guidelines(2)		257		56		313

Total	$	279	$	81	$	360

187

(1)

Represents circumstances where we believe credit events or other adverse conditions of the respective issuers have caused, or will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to the investment. In certain of these circumstances the decrease in the fair value, at the time the impairment was recorded, was partially driven by general credit spread widening or liquidity concerns and we believe the recoverable value of the investment, based on the expected future cash flows, is greater than the current fair value.

(2)

Equity security other-than-temporary impairments in the first six months of 2009 and 2008 were primarily driven by overall declines in the equity markets. For information regarding the fair value methodology used in determining our other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities,” and “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Equity Securities.”

General Account Investments

Portfolio Composition

Our investment portfolio consists of public and private fixed maturity securities, commercial mortgage and other loans, equity securities and other invested assets. The composition of our general account reflects, within the discipline provided by our risk management approach, our need for competitive results and the selection of diverse investment alternatives available primarily through our Asset Management segment. The size of our portfolio enables us to invest in asset classes that may be unavailable to the typical investor.

188

Our total general account investments were $235.7 billion and $230.4 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, which are apportioned between the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. Total general account investments attributable to the Financial Services Businesses were $176.2 billion and $171.6 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, while total general account investments attributable to the Closed Block Business were $59.6 billion and $58.7 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The following tables set forth the composition of the investments of our general account as of the dates indicated. As of June 30, 2009, the average duration of our general account investment portfolio attributable to the domestic Financial Services Businesses, including the impact of derivatives, is between 4 and 5 years.


	June 30, 2009
	Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business		Total		% of Total
	($ in millions)
Fixed Maturities:
Public, available for sale, at fair value	$	98,478	$	27,863	$	126,341	53.6	%
Public, held to maturity, at amortized cost		4,023		—		4,023	1.7
Private, available for sale, at fair value		18,853		11,966		30,819	13.1
Private, held to maturity, at amortized cost		912		—		912	0.4
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value		14,766		—		14,766	6.3
Other trading account assets, at fair value		1,998		165		2,163	0.9
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value		3,391		2,513		5,904	2.5
Commercial mortgage and other loans, at book value		21,942		8,733		30,675	13.0
Policy loans, at outstanding balance		4,413		5,443		9,856	4.2
Other long-term investments(1)		2,781		1,546		4,327	1.8
Short-term investments(2)		4,604		1,347		5,951	2.5

Total general account investments		176,161		59,576		235,737	100.0	%

Invested assets of other entities and operations(3)		7,912		—		7,912

Total investments	$	184,073	$	59,576	$	243,649


	December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business		Total		% of Total
	($ in millions)
Fixed Maturities:
Public, available for sale, at fair value	$	98,725	$	27,424	$	126,149	54.8	%
Public, held to maturity, at amortized cost		3,002		—		3,002	1.3
Private, available for sale, at fair value		18,568		11,479		30,047	13.0
Private, held to maturity, at amortized cost		806		—		806	0.4
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value		13,875		—		13,875	6.0
Other trading account assets, at fair value		728		120		848	0.4
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value		3,659		2,400		6,059	2.6
Commercial mortgage and other loans, at book value		22,092		8,748		30,840	13.4
Policy loans, at outstanding balance		4,280		5,423		9,703	4.2
Other long-term investments(1)		3,035		1,629		4,664	2.0
Short-term investments(2)		2,874		1,484		4,358	1.9

Total general account investments		171,644		58,707		230,351	100.0	%

Invested assets of other entities and operations(3)		11,674		—		11,674

Total investments	$	183,318	$	58,707	$	242,025

189

(1)

Other long-term investments consist of real estate and non-real estate related investments in joint ventures (other than our investment in operating joint ventures, which includes our investment in Wachovia Securities) and partnerships, investment real estate held through direct ownership and other miscellaneous investments.

(2)	Short-term investments consist primarily of money market funds with virtually no sub-prime exposure.

(3)

Includes invested assets of brokerage, trading and banking operations, real estate and relocation services, and asset management operations. Excludes assets of our asset management operations managed for third parties and those assets classified as “Separate account assets” on our balance sheet. For additional information regarding these investments, see “—Invested Assets of Other Entities and Operations” below.

The increase in general account investments attributable to the Financial Services Businesses in the first six months of 2009 was primarily a result of a net increase in fair value driven by credit spread tightening, the investment of proceeds from our debt and equity issuances in the second quarter of 2009 and portfolio growth as a result of reinvestment of net investment income, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency. The increase in general account investments attributable to the Closed Block Business in the first six months of 2009 was primarily due to a net increase in market value and portfolio growth as a result of reinvestment of net investment income, partially offset by a decrease in leverage.

We have substantial insurance operations in Japan, with 35% of our Financial Services Businesses’ general account investments relating to our Japanese insurance operations as of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Total general account investments related to our Japanese insurance operations were $61.0 billion and $59.8 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. As of June 30, 2009 the average duration of our general account investment portfolio related to our Japanese insurance operations, including the impact of derivatives, is approximately 11 years. The increase in general account investments related to our Japanese insurance operations in the first six months of 2009 is primarily attributable to the acquisition of Yamato Life, and portfolio growth as the result of business inflows, partially offset by the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and net declines in market value. For additional information regarding our acquisition of Yamato Life see Note 3 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table sets forth the composition of the investments of our Japanese insurance operations’ general account as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Fixed Maturities:
Public, available for sale, at fair value	$	43,374	$	42,223
Public, held to maturity, at amortized cost		4,023		3,002
Private, available for sale, at fair value		2,863		2,803
Private, held to maturity, at amortized cost		912		806
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value		1,138		1,077
Other trading account assets, at fair value		433		519
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value		1,441		2,071
Commercial mortgage and other loans, at book value		3,561		3,373
Policy loans, at outstanding balance		1,614		1,547
Other long-term investments(1)		1,352		2,143
Short-term investments		337		266

Total Japanese general account investments(2)	$	61,048	$	59,830

(1)	Other long-term investments consist of real estate and non-real estate related investments in joint ventures and partnerships, investment real estate held through direct ownership, derivatives, and other miscellaneous investments.

(2)	Excludes assets classified as “Separate accounts assets” on our balance sheet.

Our Japanese insurance operations use the yen as their functional currency, as it is the currency in which they conduct the majority of their operations. Although the majority of the Japanese general account is invested

190

in yen denominated investments, our Japanese insurance operations also hold significant investments denominated in U.S. dollars. As of June 30, 2009, our Japanese insurance operations had $12.5 billion of investments denominated in U.S. dollars, including $1.2 billion that were hedged to yen through third party derivative contracts and $6.7 billion that support liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars. As of December 31, 2008, our Japanese insurance operations had $12.3 billion of investments denominated in U.S. dollars, including $1.1 billion that were hedged to yen through third party derivative contracts and $6.0 billion that support liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars. For additional information regarding U.S. dollar investments held in our Japanese insurance operations see, “—Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment—International Insurance and Investments Division.”

Investment Results

The following tables set forth the income yield and investment income, excluding realized investment gains (losses), for each major investment category of our general account for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Financial Services Businesses					Closed Block Business					Combined
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	4.51	%	$	1,405		5.89	%	$	595		4.84	%	$	2,000
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	4.96			177		—			—		4.96			177
Equity securities	6.30			56		3.22			22		4.97			78
Commercial mortgage and other loans	5.68			310		6.40			138		5.89			448
Policy loans	5.11			55		6.42			87		5.84			142
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	0.46			14		2.55			7		0.61			21
Other investments	3.03			34		(7.74	)		(36	)	(0.08	)		(2	)

Gross investment income before investment expenses	4.43			2,051		5.42			813		4.67			2,864
Investment expenses	(0.14	)		(49	)	(0.21	)		(35	)	(0.15	)		(84	)

Investment income after investment expenses	4.29	%		2,002		5.21	%		778		4.52	%		2,780

Investment results of other entities and operations(2)				55					—					55

Total investment income			$	2,057				$	778				$	2,835


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses					Closed Block Business					Combined
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	4.74	%	$	1,398		6.19	%	$	664		5.12	%	$	2,062
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	5.18			188		—			—		5.18			188
Equity securities	5.09			60		4.05			33		4.66			93
Commercial mortgage and other loans	5.87			312		6.33			134		6.00			446
Policy loans	5.02			52		6.24			83		5.70			135
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	2.52			67		9.49			21		2.89			88
Other investments	3.23			27		1.03			4		2.60			31

Gross investment income before investment expenses	4.80			2,104		6.01			939		5.11			3,043
Investment expenses	(0.14	)		(80	)	(0.23	)		(68	)	(0.16	)		(148	)

Investment income after investment expenses	4.66	%		2,024		5.78	%		871		4.95	%		2,895

Investment results of other entities and operations(2)				131					—					131

Total investment income			$	2,155				$	871				$	3,026

191

(1)

Yields are annualized, for interim periods, and based on quarterly averages calculated using beginning and end of period balances. Yields are based on carrying values except for fixed maturities, equity securities and securities lending activity. Yields for fixed maturities are based on amortized cost. Yields for equity securities are based on cost. Yields for securities lending activity are calculated net of corresponding liabilities and rebate expenses. Yields exclude investment income on assets other than those included in invested assets of the Financial Services Businesses. Prior periods yields are presented on a basis consistent with the current period presentation.

(2)	Includes investment income of securities brokerage, securities trading, banking operations, real estate and relocation services, and asset management operations.

The net investment income yield on our general account investments after investment expenses, excluding realized investment gains (losses), was 4.52% and 4.95% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net investment income yield attributable to the Financial Services Businesses was 4.29% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 4.66% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. See below for a discussion of the change in the Financial Services Businesses’ yields.

The net investment income yield attributable to the Closed Block Business was 5.21% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 5.78% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets and lower income from investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships, driven by lower appreciation and losses on the underlying assets.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	Financial Services Businesses					Closed Block Business					Combined
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	4.60	%	$	2,861		5.99	%	$	1,205		4.94	%	$	4,066
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	5.05			354		—			—		5.05			354
Equity securities	6.00			113		2.98			42		4.71			155
Commercial mortgage and other loans	5.70			618		6.43			276		5.91			894
Policy loans	5.06			108		6.37			171		5.79			279
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	0.71			43		4.69			24		0.99			67
Other investments	3.79			80		(8.69	)		(80	)	0.01			—

Gross investment income before investment expenses	4.54			4,177		5.47			1,638		4.77			5,815
Investment expenses	(0.14	)		(103	)	(0.22	)		(73	)	(0.16	)		(176	)

Investment income after investment expenses	4.40	%		4,074		5.25	%		1,565		4.61	%		5,639

Investment results of other entities and operations(2)				51					—					51

Total investment income			$	4,125				$	1,565				$	5,690

192


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses					Closed Block Business					Combined
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	4.82	%	$	2,778		6.32	%	$	1,372		5.22	%	$	4,150
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	5.19			373		—			—		5.19			373
Equity securities	4.62			106		3.49			57		4.15			163
Commercial mortgage and other loans	5.91			606		6.53			268		6.08			874
Policy loans	5.08			103		6.26			166		5.75			269
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	3.24			166		12.19			56		3.63			222
Other investments	3.98			63		3.47			24		3.83			87

Gross investment income before investment expenses	4.89			4,195		6.16			1,943		5.22			6,138
Investment expenses	(0.14	)		(160	)	(0.24	)		(166	)	(0.16	)		(326	)

Investment income after investment expenses	4.75	%		4,035		5.92	%		1,777		5.06	%		5,812

Investment results of other entities and operations(2)				240					—					240

Total investment income			$	4,275				$	1,777				$	6,052

(1)

(2)	Includes investment income of securities brokerage, securities trading, banking operations, real estate and relocation services, and asset management operations.

The net investment income yield on our general account investments after investment expenses, excluding realized investment gains (losses), was 4.61% and 5.06% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net investment income yield attributable to the Financial Services Businesses was 4.40% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 4.75% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. See below for a discussion of the change in the Financial Services Businesses’ yields.

The net investment income yield attributable to the Closed Block Business was 5.25% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 5.92% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the impact of lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets and lower income from investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships, driven by lower appreciation and losses on the underlying assets.

193

The following tables set forth the income yield and investment income, excluding realized investment gains (losses), for each major investment category of the Financial Services Business general account, excluding the Japanese operations’ portion of the general account which is presented separately below, for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009					Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	5.62	%	$	1,041		5.83	%	$	1,057
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	5.27			174		5.52			185
Equity securities	10.49			45		8.09			42
Commercial mortgage and other loans	5.85			269		6.04			275
Policy loans	5.86			41		5.59			40
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	0.53			13		2.32			58
Other investments	1.67			10		(0.29	)		(2	)

Gross investment income before investment expenses	5.18			1,593		5.54			1,655
Investment expenses	(0.13	)		(27	)	(0.11	)		(48	)

Investment income after investment expenses	5.05	%		1,566		5.43	%		1,607

Investment results of other entities and operations(2)				55					131

Total investment income			$	1,621				$	1,738

(1)

(2)	Includes investment income of securities brokerage, securities trading, banking operations, real estate and relocation services, and asset management operations.

The net investment income yield attributable to the non-Japanese operations’ portion of the Financial Services Businesses portfolio was 5.05% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 5.43% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in fixed maturity yields as a result of lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets and lower income from short-term investments as a result of lower short-term rates.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009					Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	5.71	%	$	2,118		5.98	%	$	2,137
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	5.30			343		5.46			362
Equity securities	9.85			84		7.29			74
Commercial mortgage and other loans	5.85			536		6.11			536
Policy loans	5.75			79		5.62			79
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	0.74			38		3.27			154
Other investments	2.89			30		1.24			11

Gross investment income before investment expenses	5.30			3,228		5.70			3,353
Investment expenses	(0.13	)		(52	)	(0.11	)		(105	)

Investment income after investment expenses	5.17	%		3,176		5.59	%		3,248

Investment results of other entities and operations(2)				51					240

Total investment income			$	3,227				$	3,488

194

(1)

(2)	Includes investment income of securities brokerage, securities trading, banking operations, real estate and relocation services, and asset management operations.

The net investment income yield attributable to the non-Japanese operations’ portion of the Financial Services Businesses portfolio was 5.17% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 5.59% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in fixed maturity yields as a result of lower interest rates on floating rate investments due to rate resets and lower income from short-term investments as a result of lower short-term rates.

The following tables set forth the income yield and investment income, excluding realized investment gains (losses), for each major investment category of our Japanese operations’ general account for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009					Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	2.88	%	$	364		3.00	%	$	341
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	1.14			3		1.28			3
Equity securities	2.47			11		2.75			18
Commercial mortgage and other loans	4.80			41		4.81			37
Policy loans	3.78			14		3.71			12
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	0.13			1		4.22			9
Other investments	4.88			24		8.36			29

Gross investment income before investment expenses	2.94			458		3.22			449
Investment expenses	(0.15	)		(22	)	(0.19	)		(32	)

Total investment income	2.79	%	$	436		3.03	%	$	417

(1)

The net investment income yield attributable to the Japanese insurance operations’ portfolios was 2.79% for the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 3.03% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in yield on the Japanese insurance portfolio is primarily attributable to a lower interest rate environment both in the U.S. and Japan which impacts reinvestment rates and lower equity security dividends. The U.S. dollar denominated fixed maturities that are not hedged to yen through third party derivative contracts provide a yield that is substantially higher than the yield on comparable Japanese fixed maturities. The average value of U.S. dollar denominated fixed maturities that are not hedged to yen through third party derivative contracts for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $9.8 billion and $10.4 billion, respectively, based on amortized cost. For additional information regarding U.S. dollar investments held in our Japanese insurance operations see, “—Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment—International Insurance and Investments Division.”

195


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009					Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Yield(1)		Amount			Yield(1)		Amount
	($ in millions)
Fixed maturities	2.96	%	$	743		2.93	%	$	641
Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	2.00			11		1.98			11
Equity securities	2.82			29		2.52			32
Commercial mortgage and other loans	4.85			82		4.72			70
Policy loans	3.84			29		3.84			24
Short-term investments and cash equivalents	0.55			5		2.94			12
Other investments	4.66			50		8.28			52

Gross investment income before investment expenses	3.05			949		3.13			842
Investment expenses	(0.16	)		(51	)	(0.19	)		(55	)

Total investment income	2.89	%	$	898		2.94	%	$	787

(1)

The net investment income yield attributable to the Japanese insurance operations’ portfolios was 2.89% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to 2.94% for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in yield on the Japanese insurance portfolio is primarily attributable to a lower short-term interest rate environment both in the U.S. and Japan. The U.S. dollar denominated fixed maturities that are not hedged to yen through third party derivative contracts provide a yield that is substantially higher than the yield on comparable Japanese fixed maturities. The average value of U.S. dollar denominated fixed maturities that are not hedged to yen through third party derivative contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $9.7 billion and $9.4 billion, respectively, based on amortized cost. For additional information regarding U.S. dollar investments held in our Japanese insurance operations see, “—Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment—International Insurance and Investments Division.”

196

Fixed Maturity Securities

Our fixed maturity securities portfolio consists of publicly-traded and privately-placed debt securities across an array of industry categories. The fixed maturity securities relating to our international insurance operations are primarily comprised of foreign government securities.

Fixed Maturity Securities and Unrealized Gains and Losses by Industry Category

The following table sets forth the composition of the portion of our fixed maturity securities portfolio by industry category attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated and the associated gross unrealized gains and losses.

Fixed Maturity Securities—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
Industry(1)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(2)		Gross Unrealized Losses(2)		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(2)		Gross Unrealized Losses(2)		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Corporate Securities:
Manufacturing	$	18,988	$	563	$	1,188	$	18,363	$	19,018	$	435	$	2,098	$	17,355
Utilities		10,875		340		506		10,709		10,770		265		1,017		10,018
Finance		9,427		100		876		8,651		9,793		124		1,084		8,833
Services		8,489		149		887		7,751		8,930		102		1,409		7,623
Energy		4,594		139		313		4,420		4,592		75		579		4,088
Transportation		3,339		81		159		3,261		3,387		74		239		3,222
Retail and Wholesale		3,202		64		227		3,039		3,377		42		388		3,031
Other		921		7		111		817		1,000		26		117		909

Total Corporate Securities		59,835		1,443		4,267		57,011		60,867		1,143		6,931		55,079
Foreign Government(3)		35,133		1,125		139		36,119		32,986		2,338		62		35,262
Residential Mortgage-Backed		10,149		308		109		10,348		10,688		336		114		10,910
Asset-Backed Securities		9,982		92		2,441		7,633		10,863		90		2,467		8,486
Commercial Mortgage-Backed		7,945		96		800		7,241		8,506		3		1,657		6,852
U.S. Government		3,121		365		49		3,437		3,185		750		12		3,923
State & Municipal		456		25		1		480		597		24		8		613

Total(4)(5)	$	126,621	$	3,454	$	7,806	$	122,269	$	127,692	$	4,684	$	11,251	$	121,125

(1)	Investment data has been classified based on standard industry categorizations for domestic public holdings and similar classifications by industry for all other holdings.

(2)

Includes $139 million of gross unrealized gains and $136 million of gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009, compared to $157 million of gross unrealized gains and $133 million of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2008 on securities classified as held to maturity, which are not reflected in other comprehensive income.

(3)	As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, based on amortized cost, 87% represent Japanese government bonds held by our Japanese insurance operations, with no other individual country representing more than 5% of the balance.

(4)	Excluded from the above are securities held outside the general account in other entities and operations. For additional information regarding investments held outside the general account, see “—Invested Assets of Other Entities and Operations” below.

(5)	The table above excludes fixed maturity securities classified as trading. See “—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities” and “—Other Trading Account Assets” for additional information.

197

As a percentage of amortized cost, fixed maturity investments attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of June 30, 2009 consist primarily of 28% foreign government securities, 15% manufacturing sector, 9% public utility sector, and 8% asset-backed securities compared to 26% foreign government securities, 15% manufacturing sector, 9% asset-backed securities and 8% public utility sector as of December 31, 2008.

The gross unrealized losses related to our fixed maturity portfolio attributable to the Financial Services Businesses of $7.806 billion as of June 30, 2009 decreased compared to $11.251 billion as of December 31, 2008, as credit spreads tightened across most asset classes. The gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009 were concentrated primarily in asset-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities and the manufacturing, service and finance sectors of our corporate securities. The gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2008 were concentrated primarily in asset-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities and the manufacturing and service sectors of our corporate securities. The gross unrealized gains related to our fixed maturity portfolio attributable to the Financial Services Businesses decreased from $4.684 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $3.454 billion as of June 30, 2009, primarily due to the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and an increase in risk-free rates.

The following table sets forth the composition of the portion of our fixed maturity securities portfolio by industry category attributable to the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated and the associated gross unrealized gains and losses.

Fixed Maturity Securities—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
Industry(1)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Corporate Securities:
Manufacturing	$	8,674	$	245	$	491	$	8,428	$	8,791	$	188	$	905	$	8,074
Utilities		5,623		162		259		5,526		5,608		126		526		5,208
Services		4,233		87		352		3,968		4,467		69		590		3,946
Finance		3,149		40		173		3,016		2,455		32		232		2,255
Energy		2,068		50		99		2,019		1,963		16		229		1,750
Retail and Wholesale		1,652		47		79		1,620		1,716		32		149		1,599
Transportation		1,480		37		102		1,415		1,413		23		163		1,273
Other		1		—		—		1		—		—		—		—

Total Corporate Securities		26,880		668		1,555		25,993		26,413		486		2,794		24,105
Asset-Backed Securities		5,197		29		1,675		3,551		5,737		44		1,690		4,091
Commercial Mortgage-Backed		3,789		9		342		3,456		3,858		2		672		3,188
U.S. Government		3,115		117		131		3,101		2,998		603		1		3,600
Residential Mortgage-Backed		2,862		105		73		2,894		3,110		100		109		3,101
Foreign Government(2)		544		44		22		566		582		44		49		577
State & Municipal		258		12		2		268		240		5		4		241

Total (3)	$	42,645	$	984	$	3,800	$	39,829	$	42,938	$	1,284	$	5,319	$	38,903

(1)	Investment data has been classified based on standard industry categorizations for domestic public holdings and similar classifications by industry for all other holdings.

198

(2)	As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, based on amortized cost, no individual foreign country represents more than 9% of the balance.

(3)	The table above excludes fixed maturity securities classified as trading. See “—Other Trading Account Assets” for additional information.

As a percentage of amortized cost, fixed maturity investments attributable to the Closed Block Business as of June 30, 2009 consist primarily of 20% manufacturing sector, 13% utilities sector, 12% asset-backed securities, 10% services sector, 9% commercial mortgage-backed securities and 7% U.S. Government securities compared to 20% manufacturing sector, 13% asset-backed securities, 13% utilities sector, 10% services sector, 9% commercial mortgage-backed securities and 7% residential mortgage-backed securities as of December 31, 2008.

The gross unrealized losses related to our fixed maturity portfolio attributable to the Closed Block Business decreased from $5.319 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $3.800 billion as of June 30, 2009, primarily due to credit spread tightening across most asset classes. The gross unrealized losses as of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, were concentrated primarily in asset-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and the manufacturing, services, and utility sectors of our corporate securities. The gross unrealized gains related to our fixed maturity portfolio attributable to the Closed Block Business decreased from $1.284 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $984 million as of June 30, 2009, primarily due to an increase in risk-free rates.

Asset-Backed Securities

As of June 30, 2009, included within asset-backed securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses on an amortized cost basis is $4.956 billion ($2.870 billion fair value) of securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. While there is no market standard definition, we define sub-prime mortgages as residential mortgages that are originated to weaker quality obligors as indicated by weaker credit scores, as well as mortgages with higher loan-to-value ratios, or limited documentation. The significant deterioration of the U.S. housing market, high interest rate resets, and relaxed underwriting standards for some originators of sub-prime mortgages have led to higher delinquency rates, particularly for those mortgages issued in 2006 and 2007. The following tables set forth the amortized cost and fair value of our asset-backed securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated, by credit quality, and for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, by year of issuance (vintage).

199

Asset-Backed Securities at Amortized Cost—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Amortized Cost		Total December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Collateralized by sub-prime mortgages:
Enhanced short-term portfolio(1)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		27		14		16		12		421		490		548
2006		76		142		76		139		692		1,125		1,538
2005		5		8		—		—		10		23		35
2004 & Prior		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total enhanced short-term portfolio		108		164		92		151		1,123		1,638		2,121
All other portfolios
2009		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		2		15		—		—		302		319		268
2006		20		143		92		89		1,023		1,367		1,265
2005		—		80		89		93		274		536		565
2004 & Prior		71		424		308		172		121		1,096		1,137

Total all other portfolios		93		662		489		354		1,720		3,318		3,235

Total collateralized by sub-prime mortgages(2)		201		826		581		505		2,843		4,956		5,356
Other asset-backed securities:
Externally managed investments in the European market(3)		—		—		409		487		16		912		934
Collateralized by auto loans		602		50		14		62		12		740		1,492
Collateralized by credit cards		437		—		1		662		—		1,100		760
Collateralized by non-sub-prime mortgages		995		47		8		37		18		1,105		1,051
Other asset-backed securities(4)		543		132		58		114		322		1,169		1,270

Total asset-backed securities(5)	$	2,778	$	1,055	$	1,071	$	1,867	$	3,211	$	9,982	$	10,863

200

Asset-Backed Securities at Fair Value—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Fair Value		Total December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Collateralized by sub-prime mortgages:
Enhanced short-term portfolio(1)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		24		5		13		9		254		305		405
2006		72		113		58		109		481		833		1,284
2005		4		7		—		—		7		18		31
2004 & Prior		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total enhanced short-term portfolio		100		125		71		118		742		1,156		1,720
All other portfolios
2009		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		2		5		—		—		153		160		158
2006		16		69		37		36		519		677		709
2005		—		50		40		39		119		248		324
2004 & Prior		46		254		161		92		76		629		673

Total all other portfolios		64		378		238		167		867		1,714		1,864

Total collateralized by sub-prime mortgages		164		503		309		285		1,609		2,870		3,584
Other asset-backed securities:
Externally managed investments in the European market(3)		—		—		414		511		17		942		941
Collateralized by auto loans		609		50		13		57		7		736		1,421
Collateralized by credit cards		471		—		1		576		—		1,048		454
Collateralized by non-sub-prime mortgages		997		46		7		31		14		1,095		1,073
Other asset-backed securities(4)		475		111		48		99		209		942		1,013

Total asset-backed securities(5)	$	2,716	$	710	$	792	$	1,559	$	1,856	$	7,633	$	8,486

(1)

Our enhanced short-term portfolio is used primarily to invest cash proceeds of securities lending and repurchase activities, commercial paper issuances and cash generated from certain trading and operating activities. The investment policy statement of this portfolio requires that securities purchased for this portfolio have a remaining expected average life of 2 years or less when acquired.

(2)	Included within the $5.0 billion of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages as of June 30, 2009 are $0.6 billion of securities collateralized by second-lien exposures.

(3)	As of June 30, 2009, includes the $(600) million impact of the bifurcated embedded derivative described below.

(4)

As of June 30, 2009, includes collateralized debt obligations with amortized cost of $124 million and fair value of $71 million, with less than 1% secured by sub-prime mortgages. Also includes asset-backed securities collateralized by education loans, equipment leases, timeshares, aircraft, and franchises.

(5)

Excluded from the tables above are asset-backed securities held outside the general account in other entities and operations. For additional information regarding asset-backed securities held outside the general account, see “—Invested Assets of Other Entities and Operations” below. Also excluded from the table above are asset-backed securities classified as trading and carried at fair value. See “—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities” and “—Other Trading Account Assets” for additional information regarding these securities.

201

independent evaluation of the underlying collateral and securitization structure, including any guarantees from monoline bond insurers. The following tables set forth the percentage, based on amortized cost, of our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Financial Services Businesses by lowest rating agency rating, as of the dates indicated.

Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized by Sub-prime Mortgages—Financial Services Businesses


	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below
December 31, 2008	22	%	22	%	13	%	22	%	21	%
March 31, 2009	6	%	18	%	14	%	18	%	44	%
June 30, 2009	4	%	17	%	12	%	10	%	57	%

The changes in the ratings above reflect the impact of both paydowns in the senior tranches and increased rating agency downgrade activity generally consistent with the continued collateral deterioration.

On an amortized cost basis, asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Financial Services Businesses decreased from $5.356 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $4.956 billion as of June 30, 2009, primarily reflecting principal paydowns and other-than-temporary impairments recognized, partially offset by the increase in amortized cost resulting from our adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 on January 1, 2009. For additional information regarding our adoption of this FSP, see Note 2 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. Gross unrealized losses related to our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Financial Services Businesses were $2.088 billion as of June 30, 2009 and $1.781 billion as of December 31, 2008. For additional information regarding other-than-temporary impairments of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses” above. For information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, including the impact of our determination that the market for these securities was an inactive market, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.”

The weighted average estimated subordination percentage of our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Financial Services Businesses, excluding those supported by guarantees from monoline bond insurers, was 32% as of June 30, 2009. The subordination percentage represents the current weighted average estimated percentage of the capital structure subordinated to our investment holding that is available to absorb losses before the security incurs the first dollar loss of principal. As of June 30, 2009, based on amortized cost, approximately 78% of the asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Financial Services Businesses have estimated credit subordination percentages of 20% or more, and 43% have estimated credit subordination percentages of 30% or more.

In addition to subordination, certain securities, referred to as front pay or second pay securities, benefit from the prioritization of principal cash flows within the senior tranches of the structure. In most instances, these shorter duration senior securities have priority to principal cash flows over other securities in the structure, including longer duration senior securities. Included within the $4.956 billion of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of June 30, 2009 were $1.340 billion of securities, on an amortized cost basis, that represent front pay or second pay securities, depending on the overall structure of the securities.

The $912 million of externally managed investments in the European market, included above in asset-backed securities of the Financial Services Businesses as of June 30, 2009, reflects our investment in medium term notes that are collateralized by investment portfolios primarily consisting of European fixed income securities, including 44% European corporate and bank bonds, 22% bank capital, 11% European asset-backed

202

securities, and 23% other, as well as derivatives and varying degrees of leverage. Our investment in these notes further diversifies our credit risk. As of June 30, 2009 none of the underlying investments are securities collateralized by U.S. sub-prime mortgages, and 86% of the underlying investments are rated investment grade. The notes have a stated coupon and provide a return based on the return of the underlying portfolios and the level of leverage. The notes are accounted for as available for sale fixed maturity securities with bifurcated embedded derivatives (total return swaps). Changes in the value of the fixed maturity securities are reported in Stockholders’ Equity under the heading “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” Changes in the market value of the embedded total return swaps are included in current period earnings in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” As discussed further in Note 11 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, any changes in market value of the embedded total return swaps are excluded from adjusted operating income. The fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with these investments increased during the second quarter of 2009 due to the impact of credit spread tightening on the underlying investments. As of June 30, 2009 the embedded derivatives remain in a $600 million loss position on a cumulative basis as a result of the stress experienced in the credit markets. However, we believe the investment fundamentals remain sound, and the ultimate value that will be realized from these investments is greater than reflected by the current fair value of the embedded derivatives. In the second quarter of 2008, we began restructuring certain of these investments, which are now included as direct holdings in our portfolio, primarily classified within “Other trading account assets, at fair value.”

As of June 30, 2009, included within asset-backed securities attributable to the Closed Block Business on an amortized cost basis is $3.977 billion ($2.433 billion fair value) of securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. See above for a description of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. The following tables set forth the amortized cost and fair value of our asset-backed securities attributable to the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated, by credit quality, and for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, by year of issuance (vintage).

203

Asset-Backed Securities at Amortized Cost—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Amortized Cost		Total December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Collateralized by sub-prime mortgages:
Enhanced short-term portfolio(1)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		23		14		16		13		282		348		386
2006		78		147		78		134		491		928		1,354
2005		5		8		—		—		8		21		31
2004 & Prior		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total enhanced short-term portfolio		106		169		94		147		781		1,297		1,771
All other portfolios
2009		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		29		10		—		—		305		344		318
2006		100		—		39		63		956		1,158		1,116
2005		21		158		72		61		103		415		442
2004 & Prior		31		438		101		128		65		763		791

Total all other portfolios		181		606		212		252		1,429		2,680		2,667

Total collateralized by sub-prime mortgages(2)		287		775		306		399		2,210		3,977		4,438
Other asset-backed securities:
Collateralized by credit cards		131		—		—		429		—		560		453
Collateralized by auto loans		124		3		—		23		—		150		270
Externally managed investments in the European market(3)		—		—		78		77		—		155		148
Collateralized by education loans		119		20		—		—		6		145		192
Other asset-backed securities(4)		89		7		22		21		71		210		236

Total asset-backed securities	$	750	$	805	$	406	$	949	$	2,287	$	5,197	$	5,737

204

Asset-Backed Securities at Fair Value—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Fair Value		Total December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Collateralized by sub-prime mortgages:
Enhanced short-term portfolio(1)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		20		5		13		9		174		221		290
2006		74		116		60		105		338		693		1,143
2005		5		7		—		—		5		17		27
2004 & Prior		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total enhanced short-term portfolio		99		128		73		114		517		931		1,460
All other portfolios
2009		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		16		4		—		—		161		181		206
2006		44		—		23		32		525		624		623
2005		15		110		38		23		42		228		267
2004 & Prior		19		262		65		82		41		469		478

Total all other portfolios		94		376		126		137		769		1,502		1,574

Total collateralized by sub-prime mortgages		193		504		199		251		1,286		2,433		3,034
Other asset-backed securities:
Collateralized by credit cards		135		—		—		361		—		496		242
Collateralized by auto loans		125		3		—		20		—		148		254
Externally managed investments in the European market(3)		—		—		87		89		—		176		186
Collateralized by education loans		118		11		—		—		5		134		178
Other asset-backed securities(4)		78		5		21		18		42		164		197

Total asset-backed securities(5)	$	649	$	523	$	307	$	739	$	1,333	$	3,551	$	4,091

(1)

Our enhanced short-term portfolio is used primarily to invest cash proceeds of securities lending and repurchase activities, and cash generated from certain trading and operating activities. The investment policy statement of this portfolio requires that securities purchased for this portfolio have a remaining expected average life of 2 years or less when acquired.

(2)	Included within the $4.0 billion of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages as of June 30, 2009 are $0.3 billion of securities collateralized by second-lien exposures.

(3)	As of June 30, 2009, includes the $(126) million impact of the embedded derivative described below.

(4)	As of June 30, 2009, includes collateralized debt obligations with amortized cost of $16 million and fair value of $10 million, with none secured by sub-prime mortgages. Also includes asset-backed securities collateralized by equipment leases, timeshares, aircraft and franchises.

(5)	Excluded from the table above are asset-backed securities classified as other trading and carried at fair value. For additional information see “—Other Trading Account Assets.”

The tables above provide ratings as assigned by nationally recognized rating agencies as of June 30, 2009. In making our investment decisions, rather than relying solely on the rating agencies’ evaluations, we assign internal ratings to our asset-backed securities based upon our dedicated asset-backed securities unit’s independent evaluation of the underlying collateral and securitization structure, including any guarantees from monoline bond insurers. The following tables set forth the percentage, based on amortized cost, of our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Closed Block Business by lowest rating agency rating, as of the dates indicated.

205

Asset-Backed Securities Collateralized by Sub-prime Mortgages—Closed Block Business


	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below
December 31, 2008	26	%	25	%	10	%	18	%	21	%
March 31, 2009	9	%	20	%	9	%	13	%	49	%
June 30, 2009	7	%	19	%	8	%	10	%	56	%

On an amortized cost basis, asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Closed Block Business decreased from $4.438 billion as of December 31, 2008 to $3.977 billion as of June 30, 2009, primarily reflecting principal paydowns and other-than-temporary impairments recognized. Gross unrealized losses related to our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Closed Block Business were $1.544 billion as of June 30, 2009 and $1.405 billion as of December 31, 2008. For additional information regarding other-than-temporary impairments of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses” above. For information regarding the methodology used in determining the fair value of our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, including the impact of our determination that the market for these securities was an inactive market, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities.”

The weighted average estimated subordination percentage of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Closed Block Business, excluding those supported by guarantees from monoline bond insurers, was 33% as of June 30, 2009. The subordination percentage represents the current weighted average estimated percentage of the capital structure subordinated to our investment holding that is available to absorb losses before the security incurs the first dollar loss of principal. As of June 30, 2009, based on amortized cost, approximately 83% of the asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Closed Block Business have estimated credit subordination percentages of 20% or more, and 48% have estimated credit subordination percentages of 30% or more.

In addition to subordination, certain securities, referred to as front pay or second pay securities, benefit from the prioritization of principal cash flows within the senior tranches of the structure. In most instances, these shorter duration senior securities have priority to principal cash flows over other securities in the structure, including longer duration senior securities. Included within the $3.977 billion of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages attributable to the Closed Block Business as of June 30, 2009 were $1.335 billion of securities, on an amortized cost basis, that represent front pay or second pay securities, depending on the overall structure of the securities.

The $155 million of externally managed investments in the European market, included in asset-backed securities of the Closed Block Business as of June 30, 2009, reflects our investment in medium term notes that are collateralized by investment portfolios primarily consisting of European fixed income securities, including 44% European corporate and bank bonds, 22% bank capital, 11% European asset-backed securities, and 23% other, as well as derivatives and varying degrees of leverage. Our investment in these notes further diversifies our credit risk. As of June 30, 2009 none of the underlying investments are securities collateralized by U.S. sub-prime mortgages, and 86% of the underlying investments are rated investment grade. The notes have a stated coupon and provide a return based on the return of the underlying portfolios and the level of leverage. The notes are accounted for as available for sale fixed maturity securities with bifurcated embedded derivatives (total return swaps). Changes in the value of the fixed maturity securities are reported in Stockholders’ Equity under the heading “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” Changes in the market value of the embedded total return swaps are included in current period earnings in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with these investments increased during the second quarter of 2009 due to the impact of credit spread tightening on the underlying investments. As of June 30, 2009 the embedded derivatives remain in a $126 million loss position on a cumulative basis as a result of the stress experienced in the credit markets. However, we believe the investment fundamentals remain sound, and the ultimate value that will be realized from these investments is greater than reflected by the current fair value of the embedded derivatives.

206

Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities

As of June 30, 2009, on an amortized cost basis, $10.061 billion of the residential mortgage-backed securities in the Financial Services Businesses were publicly traded agency pass-through securities, which are supported by implicit or explicit government guarantees and have credit ratings of AA or above. Of these pass-through securities, $8.163 billion are supported by the U.S. government, and $1.898 billion are supported by foreign governments. Collateralized mortgage obligations, including approximately $43 million secured by “ALT-A” mortgages, represented the remaining $88 million of residential mortgage-backed securities (and less than 1% of total fixed maturities in the Financial Services Businesses), and 54% have credit ratings of A or above, while the remaining 46% have credit ratings of B or higher.

As of June 30, 2009, on an amortized cost basis, $2.525 billion of the residential mortgage-backed securities in the Closed Block Business were publicly traded agency pass-through securities, which are supported by implicit or explicit U.S. government guarantees and have credit ratings of AAA. Collateralized mortgage obligations, including approximately $133 million secured by “ALT-A” mortgages, represented the remaining $337 million of residential mortgage-backed securities (and 1% of total fixed maturities in the Closed Block Business), and 37% have AAA credit ratings, 2% have AA credit ratings, 18% have A credit ratings, 4% have BBB credit ratings, 30% have BB credit ratings and the remaining 9% have B credit ratings.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

Weakness in commercial real estate fundamentals, along with an overall decrease in liquidity and availability of capital have led to a very difficult refinancing environment and an increase in the overall delinquency rate on commercial mortgages in the commercial mortgage-backed securities market. Difficult conditions in the global financial markets and the overall economic downturn continue to put additional pressure on these fundamentals through rising vacancies, falling rents and falling property values. In addition, we have recognized several market factors related to commercial mortgage-backed securities issued in 2006 and 2007, including less stringent underwriting, higher levels of leverage and collateral valuations that are generally no longer realizable. To ensure our investment objectives and asset strategies are maintained, we consider these market factors in making our investment decisions on securities in these vintages. The following tables set forth the amortized cost and fair value of our commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated by credit quality and by year of issuance (vintage).

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities at Amortized Cost—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Amortized Cost		Total December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		175		—		30		98		26		329		341
2007		1,555		—		3		53		84		1,695		1,842
2006		3,115		—		—		6		4		3,125		3,389
2005		1,580		—		—		12		18		1,610		1,585
2004 & Prior		1,062		88		22		10		4		1,186		1,349

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities(1)(2)	$	7,487	$	88	$	55	$	179	$	136	$	7,945	$	8,506

207

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities at Fair Value—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009												Total December 31, 2008
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Fair Value
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		140		—		28		92		23		283		293
2007		1,397		—		3		46		66		1,512		1,393
2006		2,797		—		—		5		7		2,809		2,695
2005		1,496		—		—		12		21		1,529		1,288
2004 & Prior		1,013		72		15		5		3		1,108		1,183

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities(1)	$	6,843	$	72	$	46	$	160	$	120	$	7,241	$	6,852

(1)

Excluded from the table above are available for sale commercial mortgage-backed securities held outside the general account in other entities and operations. For additional information regarding commercial mortgage-backed securities held outside the general account, see “—Invested Assets of Other Entities and Operations” below. Also excluded from the table above are commercial mortgage-backed securities classified as trading and carried at fair value. See “—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities” for additional information regarding these securities.

(2)	Included in the table above as of June 30, 2009 are commercial mortgage-backed securities collateralized by Non-U.S. properties with amortized cost of $11 million in AAA, none in AA, $33 million in A, $168 million in BBB and $132 million in BB and below.

The weighted average estimated subordination percentage of our commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses was 33% as of June 30, 2009. The subordination percentage represents the current weighted average estimated percentage of the capital structure subordinated to our investment holding that is available to absorb losses before the security incurs the first dollar loss of principal. The weighted average estimated subordination percentage includes an adjustment for that portion of the capital structure, which has been effectively defeased by U.S. Treasury securities. As of June 30, 2009, based on amortized cost, approximately 93% of the commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses have estimated credit subordination percentages of 20% or more, and 78% have estimated credit subordination percentages of 30% or more. The following tables set forth the weighted average estimated subordination percentage, adjusted for that portion of the capital structure which has been effectively defeased by U.S. Treasury securities, of our commercial mortgage-backed securities collateralized by U.S. and Non-U.S. properties, attributable to the Financial Services Businesses based on amortized cost as of June 30, 2009, by rating and vintage.

U.S. Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities—Subordination Percentages by Rating and Vintage—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below
2009	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%
2008	32		—		—		—		—
2007	31		—		—		—		—
2006	31		—		—		—		—
2005	29		—		—		—		—
2004 & Prior	36		29		13		8		20

208

Non-U.S. Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities—Subordination Percentages by Rating and Vintage—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below
2009	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%
2008	—		—		6		7		7
2007	—		—		11		4		3
2006	—		—		—		11		1
2005	—		—		—		13		3
2004 & Prior	—		—		—		—		—

The super senior structure was introduced to the U.S. commercial mortgage-backed securities market in late 2004 and was modified in early 2005 to increase subordination from 20% to 30%. With the changes to the commercial mortgage-backed securities structure in 2005, there became three distinct AAA classes for commercial mortgage-backed securities with fixed rate terms, (1) super senior AAA with 30% subordination, (2) mezzanine AAA with 20% subordination and (3) junior AAA with approximately 14% subordination. The super senior class has priority over the mezzanine and junior classes to all principal cashflows (repayments, prepayments and recoveries on defaulted loans). As a result, all super senior bonds must be completely repaid before the mezzanine or junior bonds receive any principal cashflows. In addition, the super senior bonds will not experience any loss of principal until both the entire mezzanine and junior bonds are written-down to zero. We believe the importance of this additional credit enhancement afforded to the super senior class over the mezzanine and junior classes is limited in a benign commercial real estate cycle with low defaults but becomes more significant in a deep commercial real estate downturn under which expected losses increase substantially.

In addition to enhanced subordination, certain securities within the super senior class benefit from the prioritization of principal cash flows. The super senior class is generally structured such that shorter duration time tranches have priority over longer duration time tranches as to all principal cashflows (repayments, prepayments, and recoveries on defaulted loans) until the deal reaches 30% cumulative net loss, at which point all super senior securities are paid pro rata. As a result, short of reaching 30% cumulative net losses, the “shorter duration super senior” tranches must be completely repaid before the “longest duration super senior” tranche receives any principal cashflows. We have generally focused our purchases of recent vintage commercial mortgage-backed securities on “shorter duration super senior” tranches that we believe have sufficient priority to ensure that in most scenarios our positions will be fully repaid prior to the structure reaching the 30% cumulative net loss threshold. The following tables set forth the amortized cost of our AAA commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated, by type and by year of issuance (vintage).

209

AAA Rated Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities—Amortized Cost by Type and Vintage—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009
	Super Senior AAA Structures								Other AAA Structures
Vintage	Super Senior (shorter duration tranches)		Super Senior (longest duration tranche)		Mezzanine		Junior		Other Senior		Other Subordinate		Other		Total AAA Securities at Amortized Cost
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		175		—		—		—		—		—		—		175
2007		1,555		—		—		—		—		—		—		1,555
2006		2,059		1,046		—		—		—		—		10		3,115
2005		690		868		—		—		—		—		22		1,580
2004 & Prior		58		198		—		—		534		254		18		1,062

Total	$	4,537	$	2,112	$	—	$	—	$	534	$	254	$	50	$	7,487

The following tables set forth the amortized cost and fair value of our commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated, by credit quality and by year of issuance (vintage).

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities at Amortized Cost—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009												Total December 31, 2008
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Amortized Cost
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		10		—		—		—		—		10		10
2007		439		—		19		—		—		458		437
2006		857		—		—		—		—		857		882
2005		1,275		—		—		—		—		1,275		1,282
2004 & Prior		1,108		37		43		1		—		1,189		1,247

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities	$	3,689	$	37	$	62	$	1	$	—	$	3,789	$	3,858

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities at Fair Value—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Fair Value		Total December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		9		—		—		—		—		9		9
2007		391		—		4		—		—		395		326
2006		751		—		—		—		—		751		689
2005		1,177		—		—		—		—		1,177		1,051
2004 & Prior		1,062		28		34		—		—		1,124		1,113

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities	$	3,390	$	28	$	38	$	—	$	—	$	3,456	$	3,188

210

The weighted average estimated subordination percentage of commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Closed Block Business was 32% as of June 30, 2009. See above for a definition of this percentage. As of June 30, 2009, based on amortized cost, approximately 93% of the commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Closed Block Business have estimated credit subordination percentages of 20% or more, and 60% have estimated credit subordination percentages of 30% or more. The following tables set forth the weighted average estimated subordination percentage, adjusted for that portion of the capital structure which has been effectively defeased by US Treasury securities, of our commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Closed Block Business based on amortized cost as of June 30, 2009, by rating and vintage.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities -Subordination Percentages by Rating and Vintage—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below
2009	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%	—	%
2008	28		—		—		—		—
2007	30		—		5		—		—
2006	29		—		—		—		—
2005	28		—		—		—		—
2004 & Prior	34		19		26		9		—

As discussed above, with the changes to the commercial mortgage-backed securities market in late 2004 and early 2005, there are now three distinct AAA classes for commercial mortgage-backed securities with fixed rate terms, (1) super senior AAA with 30% subordination, (2) mezzanine AAA with 20% subordination and (3) junior AAA with approximately 14% subordination. In addition to the enhanced subordination, certain securities within the super senior class benefit from the prioritization of principal cash flows. The following table sets forth the amortized cost our AAA commercial mortgage-backed securities attributable to the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated, by type and by year of issuance (vintage).

AAA Rated Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities—Amortized Cost by Type and Vintage—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009
	Super Senior AAA Structures								Other AAA Structures
Vintage	Super Senior (shorter duration tranches)		Super Senior (longest duration tranche)		Mezzanine		Junior		Other Senior		Other Subordinate		Other		Total AAA Securities at Amortized Cost
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		10		—		—		—		—		—		—		10
2007		439		—		—		—		—		—		—		439
2006		698		131		—		—		—		—		28		857
2005		1,047		227		—		—		—		—		1		1,275
2004 & Prior		48		14		—		—		927		112		7		1,108

Total	$	2,242	$	372	$	—	$	—	$	927	$	112	$	36	$	3,689

211

Fixed Maturity Securities Credit Quality

The Securities Valuation Office, or SVO, of the NAIC, evaluates the investments of insurers for regulatory reporting purposes and assigns fixed maturity securities to one of six categories called “NAIC Designations.” NAIC designations of “1” or “2” include fixed maturities considered investment grade, which include securities rated Baa3 or higher by Moody’s or BBB- or higher by Standard & Poor’s. NAIC Designations of “3” through “6” are referred to as below investment grade, which include securities rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s and BB+ or lower by Standard & Poor’s. As a result of time lags between the funding of investments, the finalization of legal documents and the completion of the SVO filing process, the fixed maturity portfolio generally includes securities that have not yet been rated by the SVO as of each balance sheet date. Pending receipt of SVO ratings, the categorization of these securities by NAIC designation is based on the expected ratings indicated by internal analysis.

Investments of our international insurance companies are not subject to NAIC guidelines. Investments of our Japanese insurance operations are regulated locally by the Financial Services Agency, an agency of the Japanese government. The Financial Services Agency has its own investment quality criteria and risk control standards. Our Japanese insurance companies comply with the Financial Services Agency’s credit quality review and risk monitoring guidelines. The credit quality ratings of the non-U.S. dollar denominated investments of our Japanese insurance companies are based on ratings assigned by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, or rating equivalents based on ratings assigned by Japanese credit ratings agencies.

The amortized cost of our public and private below investment grade fixed maturities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses totaled $10.6 billion, or 8%, of the total fixed maturities as of June 30, 2009 and $9.0 billion, or 7%, of the total fixed maturities as of December 31, 2008. Below investment grade fixed maturities represented 30% and 19% of the gross unrealized losses attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The increase in below investment grade fixed maturity securities is primarily due to credit migration on securities held resulting from slowing economic conditions, rather than new originations or purchases.

The amortized cost of our public and private below investment grade fixed maturities attributable to the Closed Block Business totaled $7.6 billion, or 18%, of the total fixed maturities as of June 30, 2009 and $6.6 billion, or 15%, of the total fixed maturities as of December 31, 2008. Below investment grade fixed maturities represented 40% of the gross unrealized losses attributable to the Closed Block Business as of June 30, 2009, compared to 29% of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2008.

Public Fixed Maturities—Credit Quality

The following table sets forth our public fixed maturity portfolios by NAIC rating attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated.

212

Public Fixed Maturity Securities—Financial Services Businesses


(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	84,551	$	2,858	$	2,825	$	84,584	$	85,474	$	4,228	$	4,425	$	85,277
2	Baa		14,209		272		1,383		13,098		15,573		163		2,893		12,843

	Subtotal Investment Grade		98,760		3,130		4,208		97,682		101,047		4,391		7,318		98,120
3	Ba		3,534		24		767		2,791		3,009		16		800		2,225
4	B		1,693		7		465		1,235		1,639		2		565		1,076
5	C and lower		861		8		360		509		379		14		123		270
6	In or near default		466		15		197		284		36		4		4		36

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade(4)		6,554		54		1,789		4,819		5,063		36		1,492		3,607

Total Public Fixed Maturities		$	105,314	$	3,184	$	5,997	$	102,501	$	106,110	$	4,427	$	8,810	$	101,727

(1)	Reflects equivalent ratings for investments of the international insurance operations that are not rated by U.S. insurance regulatory authorities.

(2)

Includes, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, 14 securities with amortized cost of $4 million (fair value, $1 million) and 13 securities with amortized cost of $3 million (fair value, $2 million) that have been categorized based on expected NAIC designations pending receipt of SVO ratings.

(3)

Includes $130 million of gross unrealized gains and $130 million gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009, compared to $132 million of gross unrealized gains and $132 million of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2008 on securities classified as held to maturity that are not reflected in other comprehensive income.

(4)	On an amortized cost basis, as of June 30, 2009 includes $261 million in emerging markets securities and $180 million in securitized bank loans.

The following table sets forth our public fixed maturity portfolios by NAIC rating attributable to the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated.

Public Fixed Maturity Securities—Closed Block Business


(1) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
(1) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	19,212	$	531	$	1,297	$	18,446	$	20,231	$	977	$	2,040	$	19,168
2	Baa		6,053		125		536		5,642		6,555		59		1,169		5,445

	Subtotal Investment Grade		25,265		656		1,833		24,088		26,786		1,036		3,209		24,613
3	Ba		2,331		17		381		1,967		2,209		8		538		1,679
4	B		1,600		9		446		1,163		1,324		2		453		873
5	C and lower		663		10		246		427		349		6		111		244
6	In or near default		342		11		135		218		15		1		1		15

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade(2)		4,936		47		1,208		3,775		3,897		17		1,103		2,811

Total Public Fixed Maturities		$	30,201	$	703	$	3,041	$	27,863	$	30,683	$	1,053	$	4,312	$	27,424

(1)

Includes, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, 18 securities with amortized cost of $32 million (fair value, $18 million) and 18 securities with amortized cost of $30 million (fair value, $20 million) that have been categorized based on expected NAIC designations pending receipt of SVO ratings.

(2)	On an amortized cost basis, as of June 30, 2009, includes $634 million in securitized bank loans and $383 million in emerging markets securities.

213

Private Fixed Maturities—Credit Quality

The following table sets forth our private fixed maturity portfolios by NAIC rating attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated.

Private Fixed Maturity Securities—Financial Services Businesses


(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	6,263	$	100	$	261	$	6,102	$	6,284	$	112	$	408	$	5,988
2	Baa		10,962		121		1,011		10,072		11,341		92		1,310		10,123

	Subtotal Investment Grade		17,225		221		1,272		16,174		17,625		204		1,718		16,111
3	Ba		2,477		23		288		2,212		2,405		24		381		2,048
4	B		944		9		146		807		1,037		14		244		807
5	C and lower		385		5		69		321		283		7		59		231
6	In or near default		276		12		34		254		232		8		39		201

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade(4)		4,082		49		537		3,594		3,957		53		723		3,287

Total Private Fixed Maturities		$	21,307	$	270	$	1,809	$	19,768	$	21,582	$	257	$	2,441	$	19,398

(1)	Reflects equivalent ratings for investments of the international insurance operations that are not rated by U.S. insurance regulatory authorities.

(2)

Includes, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, 116 securities with amortized cost of $4,564 million (fair value, $4,642 million) and 129 securities with amortized cost of $1,211 million (fair value, $1,052 million) that have been categorized based on expected NAIC designations pending receipt of SVO ratings.

(3)

Includes $9 million of gross unrealized gains and $6 million of gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009, compared to $25 million of gross unrealized gains and $1 million of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2008 on securities classified as held to maturity that are not reflected in other comprehensive income.

(4)	On an amortized cost basis, as of June 30, 2009 includes $957 million in securitized bank loans and $207 million in commercial asset finance securities.

The following table sets forth our private fixed maturity portfolios by NAIC rating attributable to the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated.

Private Fixed Maturity Securities—Closed Block Business


(1) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
(1) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	3,156	$	137	$	87	$	3,206	$	3,379	$	116	$	115	$	3,380
2	Baa		6,603		115		350		6,368		6,175		86		460		5,801

	Subtotal Investment Grade		9,759		252		437		9,574		9,554		202		575		9,181
3	Ba		1,631		25		151		1,505		1,651		15		241		1,425
4	B		759		1		112		648		652		9		141		520
5	C and lower		165		—		34		131		158		3		39		122
6	In or near default		130		3		25		108		240		2		11		231

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade(2)		2,685		29		322		2,392		2,701		29		432		2,298

Total Private Fixed Maturities		$	12,444	$	281	$	759	$	11,966	$	12,255	$	231	$	1,007	$	11,479

214

(1)

Includes, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, 67 securities with amortized cost of $1,004 million (fair value, $937 million) and 87 securities with amortized cost of $1,908 million (fair value, $1,797 million) that have been categorized based on expected NAIC designations pending receipt of SVO ratings.

(2)	On an amortized cost basis, as of June 30, 2009, includes $541 million in securitized bank loans and $346 million in commercial asset finance securities.

Corporate Securities—Credit Quality

The following table sets forth both our public and private corporate securities by NAIC rating attributable to the Financial Services Businesses as of the dates indicated.

Corporate Securities—Financial Services Businesses


(1) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
(1) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	29,312	$	1,036	$	1,151	$	29,197	$	29,537	$	874	$	1,753	$	28,658
2	Baa		22,956		339		2,033		21,262		23,777		198		3,420		20,555

	Subtotal Investment Grade		52,268		1,375		3,184		50,459		53,314		1,072		5,173		49,213
3	Ba		4,816		27		618		4,225		4,685		29		983		3,731
4	B		1,898		9		296		1,611		2,257		15		641		1,631
5	C and lower		559		13		115		457		433		20		119		334
6	In or near default		294		19		54		259		178		7		15		170

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		7,567		68		1,083		6,552		7,553		71		1,758		5,866

Total Corporate Securities		$	59,835	$	1,443	$	4,267	$	57,011	$	60,867	$	1,143	$	6,931	$	55,079

(1)	Reflects equivalent ratings for investments of the international insurance operations that are not rated by U.S. insurance regulatory authorities.

The following table sets forth our corporate securities by NAIC rating attributable to the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated.

Corporate Securities—Closed Block Business


NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	9,919	$	388	$	264	$	10,043	$	9,382	$	329	$	435	$	9,276
2	Baa		11,645		221		659		11,207		11,379		120		1,161		10,338

	Subtotal Investment Grade		21,564		609		923		21,250		20,761		449		1,596		19,614
3	Ba		3,183		31		290		2,924		3,344		19		589		2,774
4	B		1,569		8		222		1,355		1,721		11		484		1,248
5	C and lower		383		7		83		307		335		5		114		226
6	In or near default		181		13		37		157		252		2		11		243

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		5,316		59		632		4,743		5,652		37		1,198		4,491

Total Corporate Securities		$	26,880	$	668	$	1,555	$	25,993	$	26,413	$	486	$	2,794	$	24,105

215

Credit Derivative Exposure to Public Fixed Maturities

In addition to the credit exposure from public fixed maturities noted above, we sell credit derivatives to enhance the return on our investment portfolio by creating credit exposure similar to an investment in public fixed maturity cash instruments.

In a credit derivative we sell credit protection on an identified name, or a basket of names in a first to default structure, and in return receive a quarterly premium. With single name credit default derivatives, this premium or credit spread generally corresponds to the difference between the yield on the referenced name’s public fixed maturity cash instruments and swap rates, at the time the agreement is executed. With first-to-default baskets, because of the additional credit risk inherent in a basket of named credits, the premium generally corresponds to a high proportion of the sum of the credit spreads of the names in the basket. If there is an event of default by the referenced name or one of the referenced names in a basket, as defined by the agreement, then we are obligated to pay the counterparty the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the referenced defaulted security or similar security. Subsequent defaults on the remaining names within such instruments require no further payment to counterparties.

The majority of referenced names in the credit derivatives where we have sold credit protection, as well as all the counterparties to these agreements, are investment grade credit quality and our credit derivatives generally have maturities of five years or less. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $1.168 billion and $1.222 billion, respectively, in outstanding notional amounts of credit derivative contracts where we have sold credit protection. The Financial Services Businesses had $1.104 billion and $1.161 billion of outstanding notional amounts as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Closed Block Business had $64 million and $61 million of outstanding notional amounts, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Credit derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value, including the premium received, recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The premium received for the credit derivatives we sell attributable to the Financial Services Businesses was $3 million and $5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $4 million and $7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and is included in adjusted operating income as an adjustment to “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”

The following table sets forth our exposure where we have sold credit protection through credit derivatives in the Financial Services Businesses by NAIC rating of the underlying credits as of the dates indicated.

Credit Derivatives, Sold Protection—Financial Services Businesses


NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009
		Single Name				First to Default Basket(1)					Total
		Notional		Fair Value		Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	295	$	1	$	182	$	(8	)	$	477	$	(7	)
2	Baa		25		—		290		(27	)		315		(27	)

	Subtotal Investment Grade		320		1		472		(35	)		792		(34	)
3	Ba		—		—		262		(35	)		262		(35	)
4	B		—		—		—		—			—		—
5	C and lower		—		—		50		(9	)		50		(9	)
6	In or near default		—		—		—		—			—		—

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		—		—		312		(44	)		312		(44	)

Total		$	320	$	1	$	784	$	(79	)	$	1,104	$	(78	)

216

Credit Derivatives, Sold Protection—Financial Services Businesses


NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	December 31, 2008
		Single Name					First to Default Basket(1)					Total
		Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	320	$	(9	)	$	207	$	(19	)	$	527	$	(28	)
2	Baa		—		—			517		(84	)		517		(84	)

	Subtotal Investment Grade		320		(9	)		724		(103	)		1,044		(112	)
3	Ba		—		—			15		(2	)		15		(2	)
4	B		—		—			—		—			—		—
5	C and lower		—		—			102		(32	)		102		(32	)
6	In or near default		—		—			—		—			—		—

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		—		—			117		(34	)		117		(34	)

Total		$	320	$	(9	)	$	841	$	(137	)	$	1,161	$	(146	)

(1)	First-to-default credit swap baskets, which may include credits of varying qualities, are grouped above based on the lowest credit in the basket. However, such basket swaps may entail greater credit risk than the rating level of the lowest credit.

The following table sets forth our exposure where we have sold credit protection through credit derivatives in the Closed Block Business portfolios by NAIC rating of the underlying credits as of the dates indicated.

Credit Derivatives, Sold Protection—Closed Block Business


NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009
		Single Name				First to Default Basket(1)				Total
		Notional		Fair Value		Notional		Fair Value		Notional		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	23	$	—	$	6	$	—	$	29	$	—
2	Baa		10		—		25		—		35		—

	Subtotal Investment Grade		33		—		31		—		64		—
3	Ba		—		—		—		—		—		—
4	B		—		—		—		—		—		—
5	C and lower		—		—		—		—		—		—
6	In or near default		—		—		—		—		—		—

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total		$	33	$	—	$	31	$	—	$	64	$	—

217

Credit Derivatives, Sold Protection—Closed Block Business


NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	December 31, 2008
		Single Name					First to Default Basket(1)					Total
		Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value			Notional		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	20	$	(1	)	$	6	$	—		$	26	$	(1	)
2	Baa		5		—			25		(1	)		30		(1	)

	Subtotal Investment Grade		25		(1	)		31		(1	)		56		(2	)
3	Ba		—		—			—		—			—		—
4	B		—		—			—		—			—		—
5	C and lower		5		—			—		—			5		—
6	In or near default		—		—			—		—			—		—

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		5		—			—		—			5		—

Total		$	30	$	(1	)	$	31	$	(1	)	$	61	$	(2	)

(1)	First-to-default credit swap baskets, which may include credits of varying qualities, are grouped above based on the lowest credit in the basket. However, such basket swaps may entail greater credit risk than the rating level of the lowest credit.

In addition to selling credit protection, we have purchased credit protection using credit derivatives in order to hedge specific credit exposures in our investment portfolio, including exposures relating to certain guarantees from monoline bond insurers. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Financial Services Businesses had $1.575 billion and $1.069 billion of outstanding notional amounts, reported at fair value as a $155 million asset and a $189 million asset, respectively. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Closed Block Business had $480 million and $309 million of outstanding notional amounts, reported at fair value as an asset of $80 million and $64 million, respectively. The premium paid for the credit derivatives we purchase attributable to the Financial Services Businesses was $12 million and $19 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $6 million and $9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and is included in adjusted operating income as an adjustment to “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” See Note 14 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding credit derivatives and an overall description of our derivative activities.

Unrealized Losses from Fixed Maturity Securities

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more for the following timeframes:

Unrealized Losses from Fixed Maturity Securities, Greater than 20%—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)		Amortized Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)
	(in millions)
Less than three months	$	1,629	$	298	$	9,612	$	2,605
Three months or greater but less than six months		1,811		735		13,481		4,623
Six months or greater but less than nine months		2,636		849		1,082		488
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		4,896		1,773		272		159
Greater than twelve months		1,037		485		—		—

Total	$	12,009	$	4,140	$	24,447	$	7,875

218

(1)

The aging of amortized cost and gross unrealized losses is determined based upon a count of the number of months the estimated fair value remained below amortized cost by 20% or more, using month-end valuations. The month count was reset back to historical unrealized loss month counts for securities impacted by the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2.

The gross unrealized losses were primarily concentrated in asset-backed securities as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Gross unrealized losses attributable to the Financial Services Businesses where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more of $4.140 billion as of June 30, 2009 includes $1.932 billion relating to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. Gross unrealized losses attributable to the Financial Services Businesses where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more as of June 30, 2009 also includes $201 million of gross unrealized losses on securities with amortized cost of $275 million where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 50% or more, of which, $7 million was included in the three months or greater but less than six months timeframe, $41 million was included in the six months or greater but less than nine months timeframe, $28 million was included in the nine months or greater but less than twelve months timeframe and $125 million was included in the greater than twelve months timeframe. We have not recognized the gross unrealized losses shown in the tables above as other-than-temporary impairments in earnings based on our detailed analysis of the underlying credit and cashflows on each of these securities. The gross unrealized losses are primarily attributable to general credit spread widening in the structured credit marketplace and liquidity discounts, and we believe the recoverable value of these investments based on the expected future cash flows is greater than or equal to our remaining amortized cost. At June 30, 2009, we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis. See “—Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities” for a discussion of the factors we consider in making these determinations.

The following table sets forth the amortized cost and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity securities attributable to the Closed Block Business where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more for the following timeframes:

Unrealized Losses from Fixed Maturity Securities, Greater than 20%—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)		Amortized Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)
	(in millions)
Less than three months	$	592	$	106	$	3,377	$	928
Three months or greater but less than six months		1,333		543		6,159		2,338
Six months or greater but less than nine months		868		290		662		325
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		2,594		998		25		21
Greater than twelve months		564		236		—		—

Total	$	5,951	$	2,173	$	10,223	$	3,612

(1)

The gross unrealized losses were primarily concentrated in asset-backed securities as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Gross unrealized losses attributable to the Closed Block Business where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more of $2.173 billion as of June 30, 2009 includes $1.407 billion relating to asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. Gross unrealized losses attributable to the Closed Block Business where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more as of June 30, 2009 does not includes any gross unrealized losses on securities where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 50% or

219

more. We have not recognized the gross unrealized losses shown in the tables above as other-than-temporary impairments in earnings based on our detailed analysis of the underlying credit and cashflows on each of these securities. The gross unrealized losses are primarily attributable to general credit spread widening in the structured credit marketplace and liquidity discounts, and we believe the recoverable value of these investments based on the expected future cash flows is greater than or equal to our remaining amortized cost. At June 30, 2009, we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis. See “—Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities” for a discussion of the factors we consider in making these determinations.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities

We maintain separate monitoring processes for public and private fixed maturities and create watch lists to highlight securities that require special scrutiny and management. Our public fixed maturity asset managers formally review all public fixed maturity holdings on a quarterly basis and more frequently when necessary to identify potential credit deterioration whether due to ratings downgrades, unexpected price variances, and/or company or industry specific concerns.

For private placements our credit and portfolio management processes help ensure prudent controls over valuation and management. We have separate pricing and authorization processes to establish “checks and balances” for new investments. We apply consistent standards of credit analysis and due diligence for all transactions, whether they originate through our own in-house origination staff or through agents. Our regional offices closely monitor the portfolios in their regions. We set all valuation standards centrally, and we assess the fair value of all investments quarterly. Our private fixed maturity asset managers formally review all private fixed maturity holdings on a quarterly basis and more frequently when necessary to identify potential credit deterioration whether due to ratings downgrades, unexpected price variances, and/or company or industry specific concerns.

Fixed maturity securities classified as held to maturity are those securities where we have the intent and ability to hold the securities until maturity. These securities are reflected at amortized cost in our consolidated statements of financial position. Other fixed maturity securities are considered available for sale, and, as a result, we record unrealized gains and losses to the extent that amortized cost is different from estimated fair value. All held to maturity securities and all available for sale securities with unrealized losses are subject to our review to identify other-than-temporary impairments in value. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, we consistently consider several factors including, but not limited to, the following:

•

the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest rate related, including general credit spread widening);

•

the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer; and

•

the extent and the duration of the decline, including, but not limited to, the following general guidelines;

•

declines in value greater than 20%, maintained for six months or greater;

•

declines in value greater than 15%, maintained for more than one year on below investment grade bonds; and

•

declines in value less than six months where there has been a precipitous (generally 50% or greater) decline in value.

Given recent market conditions and liquidity concerns, and the resulting historically wide bid-ask spreads and high levels of price volatility, the extent and duration of a decline in value have become less indicative of when the market may believe there has been credit deterioration with respect to an issuer. Considering these current conditions, beginning in the third quarter of 2008 our determinations of whether a decline in value is

220

other-than-temporary have placed greater emphasis on our analysis of the underlying credit versus the extent and duration of a decline in value. Our credit analysis of an investment includes determining whether the issuer is current on its contractual payments, evaluating whether it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the security, and analyzing our overall ability to recover the amortized cost of the investment. We continue to utilize valuation declines as a potential indicator of credit deterioration, and apply additional levels of scrutiny in our analysis as the severity and duration of the decline increases.

In addition, we adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” on January 1, 2009. Effective with the adoption of this guidance we recognize an other-than-temporary impairment in earnings for a debt security in an unrealized loss position when either (a) we have the intent to sell the debt security or (b) more likely than not we will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. For all debt securities in unrealized loss positions that do not meet either of these two criteria, we analyze our ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of projected future cash flows with the amortized cost of the security. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment, an other-than-temporary impairment is recorded. The net present value is calculated by discounting our best estimate of projected future cash flows at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. Our estimates of projected future cash flows are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. We develop these estimates using information based on historical internal experience, our internal credit analysis of an investment, as mentioned above, and market observable data, such as industry analyst reports and forecast, sector credit ratings and other data relevant to the collectability of the security. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates also include prepayment assumptions and other assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates, recoveries and changes in value. The determination of the assumptions used in these projections requires the use of significant management judgment.

The amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” depends on whether we intend to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the debt security meets either of these two criteria, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the impairment measurement date. For other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities that do not meet these two criteria, the net amount recognized in earnings is equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the debt security and its net present value as calculated above. Any difference between the fair value and the net present value of the debt security at the impairment measurement date is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).”

Prior to the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 on January 1, 2009, we were required to record an other-than-temporary impairment unless we could assert that we had both the intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in the debt security’s fair value to its amortized cost basis. When we determined that there was an other-than-temporary impairment based on the factors described above, the amount recognized in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” was equal to the total difference between amortized cost and fair value at the impairment measurement date.

The new cost basis of an impaired security is not adjusted for subsequent increases in estimated fair value. In periods subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment, the impaired security is accounted for as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. For debt securities, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis may be accreted into net investment income in future periods based on prospective changes in cash flow estimates, to reflect adjustments to the effective yield. For further information regarding the fair value methodology used in determining our other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Fixed Maturities,” above.

Other-than-temporary impairments of general account fixed maturity securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses that were recognized in earnings were $330 million and $444 million for the three months

221

ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $739 million and $820 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in the other-than-temporary impairments of general account fixed maturities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were $209 million and $375 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairments on asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. Other-than-temporary impairments of general account fixed maturities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include $449 million and $665 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairments on asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages.

Other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity securities attributable to the Closed Block Business that were recognized in earnings were $172 million and $209 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $353 million and $360 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Included in the other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturities attributable to the Closed Block Business for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were $100 million and $166 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairments on asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. Other-than-temporary impairments of general account fixed maturities attributable to the Closed Block Business for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include $201 million and $279 million, respectively, of other-than-temporary impairments on asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. For a further discussion of other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses” above.

Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities

Certain products included in the Retirement and International Insurance segments, are experience-rated, meaning that we expect the investment results associated with these products will ultimately accrue to contractholders. The investments supporting these experience-rated products, excluding commercial mortgage and other loans, are classified as trading. These trading investments are reflected on the balance sheet as “Trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities, at fair value.” Realized and unrealized gains and losses for these investments are reported in “Asset management fees and other income.” Investment income for these investments is reported in “Net investment income.” The following table sets forth the composition of this portfolio as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Short-term Investments and Cash Equivalents	$	553	$	553	$	1,232	$	1,232
Fixed Maturities:
Corporate Securities		8,870		8,612		8,814		7,971
Commercial Mortgage-Backed		2,235		2,132		2,335		2,092
Residential Mortgage-Backed		1,399		1,381		708		684
Asset Backed Securities		930		692		915		635
Foreign Government		474		479		416		420
U.S. Government		121		114		147		143

Total Fixed Maturities		14,029		13,410		13,335		11,945
Equity Securities		953		803		1,074		698

Total trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities	$	15,535	$	14,766	$	15,641	$	13,875

As a percentage of amortized cost, 74% of the portfolio was publicly traded as of June 30, 2009, compared to 75% as of December 31, 2008. As of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, 88% of the fixed maturity portfolio was classified as investment grade. As of June 30, 2009, $1.195 billion of the residential mortgage-backed securities were publicly traded agency pass-through securities, which are supported by implicit or explicit government guarantees all of which have credit ratings of A or higher. Collateralized mortgage obligations,

222

including approximately $124 million secured by “ALT-A” mortgages, represented the remaining $204 million of residential mortgage-backed securities, of which 94% have credit ratings of A or better and 6% are below investment grade. For a discussion of changes in the fair value of our trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities see “—Investment Gains and Losses on Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities and Changes in Experience-Rated Contractholder Liabilities Due to Asset Value Changes,” above.

The following table sets forth the composition by industry category of the corporate securities included in our trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities portfolio as of the dates indicated.

Corporate Securities by Industry Category—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
Industry(1)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Corporate Securities:
Manufacturing	$	2,967	$	2,917	$	2,870	$	2,631
Utilities		1,953		1,894		1,958		1,757
Services		1,383		1,321		1,464		1,302
Finance		1,026		979		1,045		931
Energy		678		661		624		553
Transportation		498		474		462		426
Retail and Wholesale		364		365		390		371
Other		1		1		1		—

Total Corporate Securities	$	8,870	$	8,612	$	8,814	$	7,971

(1)	Investment data has been classified based on standard industry categorizations for domestic public holdings and similar classifications by industry for all other holdings.

The following tables set forth our asset-backed securities included in our trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities portfolio as of the dates indicated, by credit quality, and for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, by year of issuance (vintage).

Asset-Backed Securities at Amortized Cost —Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities


	June 30, 2009												Total December 31, 2008
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating										Total Amortized Cost
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Amortized Cost
	(in millions)
Collateralized by sub-prime mortgages:
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		3		—		—		—		126		129		133
2006		3		4		16		16		114		153		183
2005		8		6		33		0		23		70		83
2004 & Prior		3		33		12		27		11		86		94

Total collateralized by sub-prime mortgages		17		43		61		43		274		438		493
Other asset-backed securities:
Collateralized by auto loans		88		7		—		5		—		100		149
Collateralized by credit cards		176		—		—		105		—		281		141
Other asset-backed securities		57		4		9		29		12		111		132

Total asset-backed securities	$	338	$	54	$	70	$	182	$	286	$	930	$	915

223

Asset-Backed Securities at Fair Value—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities


	June 30, 2009												Total December 31, 2008
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating										Total Fair Value
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Fair Value
	(in millions)
Collateralized by sub-prime mortgages:
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		2		—		—		—		56		58		61
2006		3		4		5		8		67		87		115
2005		6		6		20		—		13		45		63
2004 & Prior		2		20		6		14		6		48		59

Total collateralized by sub-prime mortgages(1)		13		30		31		22		142		238		298
Other asset-backed securities:
Collateralized by auto loans		90		7		—		5		—		102		144
Collateralized by credit cards		177		—		—		94		—		271		89
Other asset-backed securities(2)		46		3		7		21		4		81		104

Total asset-backed securities	$	326	$	40	$	38	$	142	$	146	$	692	$	635

(1)	Included within the $438 million of asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages as of June 30, 2009 are $34 million of securities collateralized by second-lien exposures.

(2)	As of June 30, 2009, includes collateralized debt obligations with fair value of $6 million, none of which are secured by sub-prime mortgages. Also includes asset-backed securities collateralized by timeshares, education loans, equipment leases, and franchises.

The following tables set forth our commercial mortgage-backed securities included in our trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities portfolio as of the dates indicated, by credit quality and by year of issuance (vintage).

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities at Amortized Cost—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities


	June 30, 2009												Total December 31, 2008
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating										Total Amortized Cost
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Amortized Cost
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		46		—		—		—		—		46		46
2006		197		—		—		—		—		197		197
2005		1,006		—		—		—		—		1,006		1,012
2004 & Prior		882		56		35		10		3		986		1,080

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities	$	2,131	$	56	$	35	$	10	$	3	$	2,235	$	2,335

224

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities at Fair Value—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities


	June 30, 2009												Total December 31, 2008
	Lowest Rating Agency Rating										Total Fair Value
Vintage	AAA		AA		A		BBB		BB and below		Total Fair Value
	(in millions)
2009	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
2008		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
2007		38		—		—		—		—		38		33
2006		186		—		—		—		—		186		168
2005		968		—		—		—		—		968		906
2004 & Prior		861		47		25		4		3		940		985

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities	$	2,053	$	47	$	25	$	4	$	3	$	2,132	$	2,092

The following table sets forth our public fixed maturities included in our trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities portfolio by NAIC rating as of the dates indicated.

Public Fixed Maturity Securities—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities


(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	6,448	$	108	$	219	$	6,337	$	5,843	$	48	$	455	$	5,436
2	Baa		2,535		34		96		2,473		2,673		4		359		2,318

	Subtotal Investment Grade		8,983		142		315		8,810		8,516		52		814		7,754
3	Ba		478		3		50		431		544		—		128		416
4	B		274		—		53		221		279		—		93		186
5	C and lower		114		—		50		64		50		—		29		21
6	In or near default		94		—		61		33		30		—		27		3

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		960		3		214		749		903		—		277		626

Total Public Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities		$	9,943	$	145	$	529	$	9,559	$	9,419	$	52	$	1,091	$	8,380

(1)	See “—Fixed Maturity Securities Credit Quality” above for a discussion on NAIC designations.

(2)	Reflects equivalent ratings for investments of the international insurance operations that are not rated by U.S. insurance regulatory authorities.

(3)	Amounts are reported in “Asset management fees and other income.”

225

The following table sets forth our private fixed maturities included in our trading account assets supporting insurance liabilities portfolio by NAIC rating as of the dates indicated.

Private Fixed Maturity Securities—Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities


(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
(1)(2) NAIC Designation	Rating Agency Equivalent	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains(3)		Gross Unrealized Losses(3)		Fair Value
		(in millions)
1	Aaa, Aa, A	$	932	$	3	$	38	$	897	$	977	$	2	$	60	$	919
2	Baa		2,444		23		139		2,328		2,191		13		191		2,013

	Subtotal Investment Grade		3,376		26		177		3,225		3,168		15		251		2,932
3	Ba		509		1		44		466		571		2		74		499
4	B		132		1		22		111		141		—		37		104
5	C and lower		63		1		17		47		10		—		2		8
6	In or near default		6		—		4		2		26		—		4		22

	Subtotal Below Investment Grade		710		3		87		626		748		2		117		633

Total Private Trading Account Assets Supporting Insurance Liabilities		$	4,086	$	29	$	264	$	3,851	$	3,916	$	17	$	368	$	3,565

(1)	See “—Fixed Maturity Securities Credit Quality” above for a discussion on NAIC designations.

(2)	Reflects equivalent ratings for investments of the international insurance operations that are not rated by U.S. insurance regulatory authorities.

(3)	Amounts are reported in “Asset management fees and other income.”

Other Trading Account Assets

“Other trading account assets, at fair value” consist primarily of investments and certain derivatives we use either in our capacity as a broker-dealer or for asset and liability management activities. Also, for certain financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would need to be bifurcated and reported at fair value, we may elect to classify the entire instrument as a trading account asset and report it within “Other trading account assets.” These instruments are carried at fair value, with realized and unrealized gains and losses reported in “Asset management fees and other income.” Interest and dividend income from these investments is reported in “Net investment income.” The following table sets forth the composition of our other trading account assets as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses				Closed Block Business				Financial Services Businesses				Closed Block Business
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Short-term Investments and Cash Equivalent	$	6	$	6	$	—	$	—	$	6	$	6	$	—	$	—
Fixed Maturities:
Corporate Securities		103		94		123		119		96		88		123		105
Asset-Backed Securities		1,647		1,575		26		25		371		269		25		15
Commercial Mortgage-Backed		212		119		—		—		216		135		—		—
Residential Mortgage-Backed		261		118		—		—		278		150		—		—
Foreign Government		32		33		—		—		33		34		—		—
U.S. Government		13		13		—		—		9		9		—		—

Total Fixed Maturities		2,268		1,952		149		144		1,003		685		148		120
Equity Securities		25		23		19		21		30		23		—		—
Other		15		17		—		—		14		14		—		—

Total other trading account assets	$	2,314	$	1,998	$	168	$	165	$	1,053	$	728	$	148	$	120

226

During the first six months of 2009, we purchased asset-backed securities under the Federal Reserve’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF. TALF provides secured financing for asset-backed securities backed by certain types of consumer and small business loans. As of June 30, 2009, $1,250 million of asset-backed securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses were purchased under TALF and are reflected within “Other trading account assets.” We received secured financing from the Federal Reserve of $1,167 million related to the purchase of these securities that is reflected within “Long-term debt.” For additional information regarding TALF, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

As of June 30, 2009, on an amortized cost basis 95% of asset-backed securities classified as “Other trading account assets” attributable to the Financial Services Businesses have credit ratings of A or above, 4% have BBB and the remaining 1% have BB and below credit ratings. As of June 30, 2009, on an amortized cost basis 37% of asset-backed securities classified as “Other trading account assets” attributable to the Closed Block Business have credit ratings of A or above and the remaining 63% have BBB credit ratings.

In second quarter of 2008, we began restructuring certain externally managed investments in the European market attributable to the Financial Services Businesses, which reflected our investment in medium term notes that are collateralized by investment portfolios primarily consisting of European fixed income securities. These investments are now included as direct holdings in our portfolio and are reflected within “Other trading account assets.” The medium term note investments were previously recorded within “fixed maturity securities—available for sale.” For additional information regarding externally managed investments in the European market, see “—Fixed Maturity Securities—Asset-Backed Securities.”

Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans

Investment Mix

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 we held approximately 13% of our general account investments in commercial mortgage and other loans. This percentage is net of a $419 million and $211 million allowance for losses as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The following table sets forth the composition of our commercial mortgage and other loans portfolio, before the allowance for losses, as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business		Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business
	(in millions)
Commercial mortgage loans	$	19,817	$	8,818	$	19,936	$	8,765
Uncollateralized loans		1,316		40		1,204		40
Loans collateralized by residential properties(1)		915		1		976		1
Other collateralized loans(2)		187		—		129		—

Total commercial mortgage and other loans(3)	$	22,235	$	8,859	$	22,245	$	8,806

(1)	Loans collateralized by residential properties includes $905 million and $965 million of Japanese recourse loans as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

(2)	Other collateralized loans attributable to the Financial Services Businesses includes $95 million and $109 million of collateralized consumer loans and $19 million and $19 million of loans collateralized by aviation assets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

(3)	Excluded from the tables above are commercial mortgage loans held outside the general account in other entities and operations. For additional information regarding commercial mortgage loans held outside the general account, see “—Invested Assets of Other Entities and Operations” below.

We originate domestic commercial mortgage loans using dedicated investment staff and a network of independent companies through our various regional offices across the country. All loans are underwritten consistently to our standards using a proprietary quality rating system that has been developed from our experience in real estate and mortgage lending.

227

Uncollateralized loans primarily represent reverse dual currency loans and corporate loans which do not meet the definition of a security under SFAS No 115.

Composition of Commercial Mortgage Loans

The global financial markets have experienced extreme stress since the second half of 2007. The availability and cost of credit has been materially affected, leading to a decrease in the overall liquidity and availability of capital in the commercial mortgage loan market, and in particular a decrease in activity by securitization lenders. These conditions have led to greater opportunities for more selective originations by portfolio lenders such as our general account. While we have observed weakness in commercial real estate fundamentals, delinquency rates on our commercial mortgage loans have been relatively stable in recent years. However, continued difficult conditions in the global financial markets and the overall economic downturn could put additional pressure on these fundamentals through rising vacancies, falling rents and falling property values, potentially resulting in higher levels of loan losses.

Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio strategy emphasizes diversification by property type and geographic location. The following tables set forth the breakdown of the gross carrying values of our general account investments in commercial mortgage loans by geographic region and property type as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses				Closed Block Business				Financial Services Businesses				Closed Block Business
	Gross Carrying Value		% of Total		Gross Carrying Value		% of Total		Gross Carrying Value		% of Total		Gross Carrying Value		% of Total
	($ in millions)
Commercial mortgage loans by region:
U.S. Regions:
Pacific	$	5,801	29.3	%	$	2,908	33.0	%	$	5,854	29.4	%	$	2,834	32.3	%
South Atlantic		4,586	23.1			1,709	19.4			4,614	23.2			1,751	20.0
Middle Atlantic		2,831	14.3			1,864	21.1			2,953	14.8			1,896	21.6
East North Central		1,677	8.4			451	5.1			1,772	8.9			500	5.7
West South Central		1,548	7.8			654	7.4			1,460	7.3			646	7.4
Mountain		1,202	6.1			485	5.5			1,129	5.7			407	4.6
New England		867	4.4			323	3.7			903	4.5			327	3.7
West North Central		585	2.9			203	2.3			604	3.0			180	2.1
East South Central		373	1.9			165	1.9			385	1.9			167	1.9

Subtotal—U.S.		19,470	98.2			8,762	99.4			19,674	98.7			8,708	99.3
Asia		10	0.1			—				1	—			—	—
Other		337	1.7			56	0.6			261	1.3			57	0.7

Total commercial mortgage loans	$	19,817	100.0	%	$	8,818	100.0	%	$	19,936	100.0	%	$	8,765	100.0	%

228


	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses				Closed Block Business				Financial Services Businesses				Closed Block Business
	Gross Carrying Value		% of Total		Gross Carrying Value		% of Total		Gross Carrying Value		% of Total		Gross Carrying Value		% of Total
	($ in millions)
Commercial mortgage loans by property type:
Industrial buildings	$	4,491	22.7	%	$	1,965	22.3	%	$	4,544	22.8	%	$	1,959	22.3	%
Retail stores		3,965	20.0			1,682	19.1			3,742	18.8			1,578	18.0
Office buildings		3,882	19.6			1,799	20.4			4,024	20.2			1,787	20.4
Apartment Complexes		3,399	17.1			1,659	18.8			3,549	17.8			1,727	19.7
Other		1,768	8.9			549	6.2			1,719	8.6			518	5.9
Hospitality		1,164	5.9			416	4.7			1,134	5.7			427	4.9
Agricultural properties		1,148	5.8			748	8.5			1,224	6.1			769	8.8

Total commercial mortgage loans	$	19,817	100.0	%	$	8,818	100.0	%	$	19,936	100.0	%	$	8,765	100.0	%

Loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios are measures commonly used to assess the quality of commercial mortgage loans. The loan-to-value ratio compares the amount of the loan to the fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan, and is commonly expressed as a percentage. Loan-to-value ratios greater than 100% percent indicate that the loan amount is greater than the collateral value. A smaller loan-to-value ratio indicates a greater excess of collateral value over the loan amount. The debt service coverage ratio compares a property’s net operating income to its debt service payments. Debt service coverage ratios less than 1.0 times indicate that property operations do not generate enough income to cover the loan’s current debt payments. A larger debt service coverage ratio indicates a greater excess of net operating income over the debt service payments.

As of June 30, 2009, our general account investments in commercial mortgage loans attributable to the Financial Services Businesses had a weighted average debt service coverage ratio of 1.83 times, and a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 62%. As of June 30, 2009, our general account investments in commercial mortgage loans attributable to the Closed Block Business had a weighted average debt service coverage ratio of 1.94 times, and a weighted average loan-to-value ratio of 56%. For those general account commercial mortgage loans attributable to the Financial Services Businesses that were originated in 2009, the weighted average loan-to-value ratio was 56%, and the weighted average debt service coverage ratio was 1.58 times.

The values utilized in calculating these loan-to-value ratios are developed as part of our periodic review of the commercial mortgage loan portfolio, which includes a quality re-rating as well as an internal evaluation of the underlying collateral value. For loans with collateral under construction, renovation or lease-up, a stabilized value and projected net operating income are used in the calculation of the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios. Our commercial mortgage loan portfolio attributable to the Financial Services Businesses included approximately $1.8 billion of such loans as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and our commercial mortgage loan portfolio attributable to the Closed Block Business included approximately $0.7 billion of such loans as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. All else being equal, these loans are inherently more risky than those collateralized by properties that have already stabilized. For information regarding similar loans we hold as part of our commercial mortgage operations, see “—Invested Asset of Other Entities and Operations.” The following tables set forth the gross carrying value of our general account investments in commercial mortgage loans attributable to the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business as of the dates indicated by loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios.

229

Commercial Mortgage Loans by Loan-to-Value and Debt Service Coverage Ratios—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009
	Debt Service Coverage Ratio												Total Commercial Mortgage Loans
Loan-to-Value Ratio	Greater than 2.0x		1.8x to 2.0x		1.5x to 1.8x		1.2x to 1.5x		1.0x to 1.2x		Less than 1.0x		Total Commercial Mortgage Loans
	(in millions)
0% - 50%	$	3,193	$	490	$	828	$	630	$	172	$	80	$	5,393
50% - 60%		858		694		1,576		451		219		42		3,840
60% - 70%		711		456		1,041		735		183		84		3,210
70% - 80%		386		612		775		1,641		411		163		3,988
80% - 90%		—		—		513		1,084		27		229		1,853
90% - 100%		167		51		243		254		144		63		922
Greater than 100%		—		—		43		21		326		221		611

Total commercial mortgage loans	$	5,315	$	2,303	$	5,019	$	4,816	$	1,482	$	882	$	19,817

Commercial Mortgage Loans by Loan-to-Value and Debt Service Coverage Ratios—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009
	Debt Service Coverage Ratio												Total Commercial Mortgage Loans
Loan-to-Value Ratio	Greater than 2.0x		1.8x to 2.0x		1.5x to 1.8x		1.2x to 1.5x		1.0x to 1.2x		Less than 1.0x		Total Commercial Mortgage Loans
	(in millions)
0% - 50%	$	2,006	$	535	$	448	$	349	$	65	$	55	$	3,458
50% - 60%		331		312		557		227		97		78		1,602
60% - 70%		184		284		425		418		28		22		1,361
70% - 80%		69		166		142		893		92		19		1,381
80% - 90%		—		—		175		304		18		119		616
90% - 100%		—		—		86		55		109		—		250
Greater than 100%		—		—		—		13		62		75		150

Total commercial mortgage loans	$	2,590	$	1,297	$	1,833	$	2,259	$	471	$	368	$	8,818

The following tables set forth the breakdown of our commercial mortgage loans by year of origination as of June 30, 2009.

Commercial Mortgage Loans by Year of Origination


	June 30, 2009
	Financial Services Businesses				Closed Block Business
Year of Origination	Gross Carrying Value		% of Total		Gross Carrying Value		% of Total
	($ in millions)
2009	$	818	4.1	%	$	335	3.8	%
2008		3,687	18.6			1,206	13.7
2007		4,758	24.0			1,724	19.6
2006		3,496	17.7			1,111	12.6
2005		2,285	11.5			842	9.5
2004 and prior		4,773	24.1			3,600	40.8

Total commercial mortgage loans	$	19,817	100.0	%	$	8,818	100.0	%

230

Commercial Mortgage and Other Loan Quality

Ongoing review of the portfolio is performed and loans are placed on watch list status based on a predefined set of criteria. We place loans on early warning status in cases where, based on our analysis of the loan’s collateral, the financial situation of the borrower or tenants or other market factors, we believe a loss of principal or interest could occur. We classify loans as closely monitored when we determine there is a collateral deficiency or other credit events that may lead to a potential loss of principal or interest. Loans not in good standing are those loans where we have concluded that there is a high probability of loss of principal, such as when the loan is in the process of foreclosure or the borrower is in bankruptcy. In our domestic operations, our workout and special servicing professionals manage the loans on the watch list. As described below, in determining our allowance for losses we evaluate each loan on the watch list to determine if it is probable that amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. In our international portfolios, we monitor delinquency in consumer loans on a pool basis and evaluate any servicing relationship and guarantees the same way we do for commercial mortgage loans.

We establish an allowance for losses to provide for the risk of credit losses inherent in the lending process. The allowance includes loan specific reserves for loans that are determined to be non-performing as a result of our loan review process, and a portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses. We define a non-performing loan as a loan for which it is probable that amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The loan specific portion of the loss allowance is based on our assessment as to ultimate collectability of loan principal and interest. Valuation allowances for a non-performing loan are recorded based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or based on the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The portfolio reserve for incurred but not specifically identified losses considers our past loan experience, the current credit composition of the portfolio, historical credit migration, property type diversification, default and loss severity statistics and other relevant factors. The valuation allowance for commercial mortgage and other loans can increase or decrease from period to period based on these factors.

The following table sets forth the gross carrying value for commercial mortgage and other loans by loan classification as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business		Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business
	(in millions)
Current	$	22,096	$	8,827	$	22,162	$	8,788
Delinquent, not in foreclosure		69		3		57		17
Delinquent, in foreclosure		7		—		—		—
Restructured		63		29		26		1

Total commercial mortgage and other loans	$	22,235	$	8,859	$	22,245	$	8,806

The following table sets forth the change in valuation allowances for our commercial mortgage and other loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business		Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business
	(in millions)
Allowance, beginning of year	$	153	$	58	$	90	$	28
Addition to/(release of) allowance for losses		140		68		58		30
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		—		—		—		—
Change in foreign exchange		—		—		5		—

Allowance, end of period	$	293	$	126	$	153	$	58

231

As of June 30, 2009 the $293 million valuation allowance for our commercial mortgage and other loan portfolio attributable to the Financial Services Businesses includes $63 million related to loan specific reserves and $230 million related to the portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses. As of December 31, 2008 the $153 million valuation allowance for our commercial mortgage and other loan portfolio attributable to the Financial Services Businesses included $8 million related to loan specific reserves and $145 million related to the portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses.

As of June 30, 2009 the $126 million valuation allowance for our commercial mortgage and other loan portfolio attributable to the Closed Block Business includes $27 million related to loan specific reserves and $99 million related to the portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses. As of December 31, 2008 the $58 million valuation allowance for our commercial mortgage and other loan portfolio attributable to the Closed Block Business included $6 million related to loan specific reserves and $52 million related to the portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses. The increase in the allowance for both the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business primarily reflects the overall economic downturn and weakness in commercial real estate fundamentals, as discussed above.

Equity Securities

Investment Mix

The equity securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses consist principally of investments in common and preferred stock of publicly traded companies, as well as mutual fund shares and perpetual preferred securities, as discussed below. The following table sets forth the composition of our equity securities portfolio attributable to the Financial Services Businesses and the associated gross unrealized gains and losses as of the dates indicated:

Equity Securities—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
	Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Public equity	$	2,934	$	243	$	224	$	2,953	$	3,807	$	43	$	624	$	3,226
Private equity		434		51		47		438		461		20		48		433

Total Equity	$	3,368	$	294	$	271	$	3,391	$	4,268	$	63	$	672	$	3,659

Public equity securities include mutual fund shares representing our interest in the underlying assets of certain of our separate account investments supporting corporate owned life insurance. These mutual funds invest primarily in high yield bonds. The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of these shares as of June 30, 2009 were $1,261 million, $185 million, $6 million, and $1,440 million, respectively. The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of these shares as of December 31, 2008 were $1,306 million, $23 million, $119 million, and $1,210 million, respectively.

Equity securities also include perpetual preferred securities, which have characteristics of both debt and equity securities. The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of perpetual preferred securities as of June 30, 2009 were $351 million, $6 million, $81 million, and $276 million, respectively. The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of these securities as of December 31, 2008 were $378 million, $1 million, $93 million, and $286 million, respectively.

The equity securities attributable to the Closed Block Business consist principally of investments in common and preferred stock of publicly traded companies, as well as perpetual preferred securities. The

232

following table sets forth the composition of our equity securities portfolio attributable to the Closed Block Business and the associated gross unrealized gains and losses as of the dates indicated:

Equity Securities—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009								December 31, 2008
	Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Public equity	$	2,616	$	261	$	387	$	2,490	$	2,998	$	196	$	811	$	2,383
Private equity		23		—		—		23		17		—		—		17

Total Equity	$	2,639	$	261	$	387	$	2,513	$	3,015	$	196	$	811	$	2,400

The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of perpetual preferred securities as of June 30, 2009 were $190 million, $2 million, $43 million, and $149 million, respectively. The cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and fair value of these securities as of December 31, 2008 were $106 million, $0 million, $29 million, and $77 million, respectively.

Unrealized Losses from Equity Securities

The following table sets forth the cost and gross unrealized losses of our equity securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below cost by less than 20% for the following timeframes:

Unrealized Losses from Equity Securities, Less than 20%—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)		Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)
	(in millions)
Less than three months	$	1,002	$	27	$	1,352	$	104
Three months or greater but less than six months		118		10		340		31
Six months or greater but less than nine months		172		19		174		9
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		286		19		124		6
Greater than twelve months		257		29		—		—

Total	$	1,835	$	104	$	1,990	$	150

(1)	The aging of amortized cost and gross unrealized losses is determined based upon a count of the number of months the estimated fair value remained below cost by less than 20%, using month-end valuations.

233

Unrealized Losses from Equity Securities, Greater than 20%—Financial Services Businesses


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)		Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)
	(in millions)
Less than three months	$	37	$	9	$	1,002	$	337
Three months or greater but less than six months		287		73		248		80
Six months or greater but less than nine months		137		52		39		17
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		59		21		322		88
Greater than twelve months		22		12		—		—

Total	$	542	$	167	$	1,611	$	522

(1)	The aging of amortized cost and gross unrealized losses is determined based upon a count of the number of months the estimated fair value remained below cost by 20% or more, using month-end valuations.

The gross unrealized losses as of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were primarily concentrated in the finance, other, and manufacturing, sectors. Gross unrealized losses attributable to the Financial Services Businesses where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below cost by 20% or more of $167 million as of June 30, 2009 includes $12 million of gross unrealized losses on securities with a cost of $21 million where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below cost by 50% or more, all of which was included in the greater than twelve months timeframe. Securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more as of June 30, 2009 represent perpetual preferred securities, which have characteristics of both debt and equity securities and to which an impairment model similar to our fixed maturities is applied. We have not recognized the gross unrealized losses shown in the table above as other-than-temporary impairments. See “—Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Equity Securities” for a discussion of the factors we consider in making these determinations.

The following table sets forth the cost and gross unrealized losses of our equity securities attributable to the Closed Block Business where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below cost by less than 20% for the following timeframes:

Unrealized Losses from Equity Securities, Less than 20%—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)		Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)
	(in millions)
Less than three months	$	1,168	$	21	$	1,348	$	106
Three months or greater but less than six months		53		8		—		—
Six months or greater but less than nine months		188		21		—		—
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		357		45		—		—
Greater than twelve months		52		9		—		—

Total	$	1,818	$	104	$	1,348	$	106

(1)	The aging of amortized cost and gross unrealized losses is determined based upon a count of the number of months the estimated fair value remained below cost by less than 20%, using month-end valuations.

234

Unrealized Losses from Equity Securities, Greater than 20%—Closed Block Business


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)		Cost(1)		Gross Unrealized Losses(1)
	(in millions)
Less than three months	$	111	$	29	$	288	$	89
Three months or greater but less than six months		87		27		1,289		580
Six months or greater but less than nine months		201		75		72		36
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		421		152		—		—
Greater than twelve months		—		—		—		—

Total	$	820	$	283	$	1,649	$	705

(1)	The aging of amortized cost and gross unrealized losses is determined based upon a count of the number of months the estimated fair value remained below cost by 20% or more, using month-end valuations.

The gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009 were primarily concentrated in the manufacturing, finance, and service sectors compared to December 31, 2008 where the gross unrealized losses were primarily concentrated in the manufacturing, finance and services sectors. Gross unrealized losses attributable to the Closed Block Business where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below cost by 20% or more of $283 million as of June 30, 2009 does not includes any gross unrealized losses on securities where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below cost by 50% or more. Securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more as of June 30, 2009 represent perpetual preferred securities, which have characteristics of both debt and equity securities and to which an impairment model similar to our fixed maturities is applied. We have not recognized the gross unrealized losses shown in the table above as other-than-temporary impairments. See “—Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Equity Securities” for a discussion of the factors we consider in making these determinations.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments of Equity Securities

For those equity securities classified as available for sale we record unrealized gains and losses to the extent cost is different from estimated fair value. All securities with unrealized losses are subject to our review to identify other-than-temporary impairments in value. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, we consistently consider several factors including, but not limited to, the following:

•

the extent and the duration of the decline; including, but not limited to, the following general guidelines:

•

declines in value greater than 20%, maintained for six months or greater;

•

declines in value maintained for one year or greater; and

•

declines in value greater than 50%;

•

the reasons for the decline in value (issuer specific event, currency or market fluctuation);

•

our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value, including certain equity securities managed by independent third parties where we do not exercise management discretion concerning individual buy or sell decisions; and

•

the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer.

235

Given recent market conditions and liquidity concerns, and the resulting high levels of price volatility, beginning in the third quarter of 2008 we extended the parameters under which we consider a decline in value to be other-than-temporary. In particular, we generally recognize other-than-temporary impairments for securities with declines in value greater than 50% maintained for six months or greater or with any decline in value maintained for one year or greater. In addition, in making our determinations we continue to analyze the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, including an assessment of the issuer’s capital position, and consider our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value.

For those securities that have declines in value that are deemed to be only temporary, we make an assertion as to our ability and intent to retain the security until recovery. Once identified, these securities are restricted from trading unless authorized based upon events that could not have been foreseen at the time we asserted our ability and intent to retain the security until recovery. Examples of such events include, but are not limited to, the deterioration of the issuer’s creditworthiness, a major business combination or disposition, a change in regulatory requirements, certain other portfolio actions or other similar events. For those securities that have declines in value for which we cannot assert our ability and intent to retain until recovery, including certain equity securities managed by independent third parties where we do not exercise management discretion concerning individual buy or sell decisions, impairments are recognized as other-than-temporary regardless of the reason for, or the extent of, the decline. For perpetual preferred securities, which have characteristics of both debt and equity securities, we apply an impairment model similar to our fixed maturity securities, factoring in the position of the security in the capital structure and the lack of a formal maturity date. For additional discussion of our policies regarding other-than-temporary impairments of fixed maturity securities, see “—Fixed Maturity Securities—Other-than-Temporary Impairments of Fixed Maturity Securities” above.

When we determine that there is an other-than-temporary impairment, we record a writedown to estimated fair value, which reduces the cost basis. The new cost basis of an impaired security is not adjusted for subsequent increases in estimated fair value. Estimated fair values for publicly traded equity securities are based on quoted market prices or prices obtained from independent pricing services. Estimated fair values for privately traded equity securities are determined using valuation and discounted cash flow models that require a substantial level of judgment. In determining the fair value of certain privately traded equity securities the discounted cash flow model may also use unobservable inputs, which reflect our own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Impairments on equity securities are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” and are excluded from adjusted operating income. For further information regarding the fair value methodology used in determining our other-than-temporary impairments, see “—Valuation of Assets and Liabilities—Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities—Valuation of Equity Securities,” above.

Impairments of equity securities attributable to the Financial Services Businesses were $64 million and $95 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $317 million and $143 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Impairments of equity securities attributable to the Closed Block Business were $199 million and $135 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $439 million and $187 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For a further discussion of impairments, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses” above.

236

Other Long-Term Investments

“Other long-term investments” are comprised as follows:


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business		Financial Services Businesses		Closed Block Business
	(in millions)
Joint ventures and limited partnerships:
Real estate related	$	339	$	379	$	405	$	348
Non real estate related		855		993		904		1,044
Real estate held through direct ownership		1,015		—		1,109		—
Other(1)		572		174		617		237

Total other long-term investments	$	2,781	$	1,546	$	3,035	$	1,629

(1)	Primarily includes derivatives and member stock held in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. For additional information regarding our holding in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, see Note 9 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

Invested Assets of Other Entities and Operations

The following table sets forth the composition of the investments held outside the general account in other entities and operations as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Fixed Maturities:
Public, available for sale, at fair value	$	1,709	$	1,805
Private, available for sale, at fair value		44		55
Other trading account assets, at fair value		1,552		3,488
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value		13		6
Commercial mortgage and other loans, at book value		2,019		2,274
Securities purchased under agreements to resell		—		480
Other long-term investments		1,389		2,348
Short-term investments		1,186		1,218

Total investments	$	7,912	$	11,674

The table above includes the invested assets of our brokerage, trading and banking operations, real estate and relocation services, and asset management operations. Assets of our asset management operations managed for third parties and those assets classified as “separate account assets” on our balance sheet are not included.

Our derivatives trading operations maintain trading positions in various foreign exchange instruments and commodities, primarily to facilitate transactions for our clients. We seek to use short security positions and forwards, futures, options and other derivatives to limit exposure to interest rate and other market risks associated with these positions. We also trade derivative financial instruments that allow our clients to manage exposure to interest rate, currency and other market risks. Our derivative transactions involve both exchange-listed and over-the-counter contracts. Our global commodities group provides advice, sales and trading on a global basis covering a wide variety of commodity, financial and foreign exchange futures, swap and forward contracts, including agricultural commodities, base and precious metals, major currencies, interest rate and stock indices. We act both as a broker, buying and selling exchange-listed contracts for our customers, and as a dealer, by entering into futures and security transactions as a principal. The positions held relating to these trading operations are primarily included in “Other trading account assets.”

237

In our banking operations, customer deposit liabilities are primarily supported by fixed maturity and short-term investments, in addition to cash and cash equivalents.

As part of our asset management operations we make proprietary investments in real estate, as well as fixed income, public equity and real estate securities, including controlling interests. Certain of these investments are made primarily for purposes of co-investment in our managed funds and structured products. Other proprietary investments are made with the intention to sell or syndicate to investors, including our general account, or for placement in funds and structured products that we offer and manage (seed investments). These proprietary investments are primarily included in “Other long-term investments.” As part of our asset management operations we also make short term loans to our managed funds that are secured by equity commitments from investors or assets of the funds. These short term loans are primarily included in “Short-term investments.”

Our asset management operations also include our commercial mortgage operations, which provide mortgage origination, asset management and servicing for our general account, institutional clients, and government sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae, the Federal Housing Administration, and Freddie Mac. We also originate shorter-term interim loans for spread lending that are collateralized by assets generally under renovation or lease-up. All else being equal, these interim loans are inherently more risky than those collateralized by properties that have already stabilized. Due to current market conditions and the inherent risk of these loans, the underwriting of new interim loans has been suspended. Our interim loans are generally paid off through refinancing or the sale of the underlying collateral by the borrower. As of June 30, 2009, the interim loans had an unpaid principal balance of $1.8 billion and an allowance for losses or credit related market value losses totaling $150 million. The weighted average loan-to-value ratio was 109%, indicating that, in aggregate, the loan amount was greater than the collateral value, and the weighted average debt service coverage ratio was 1.26 times. A stabilized value and projected net operating income are used in the calculation of the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios. The mortgage loans of our commercial mortgage operations are included in “Commercial mortgage and other loans,” with related derivatives and other hedging instruments primarily included in “Other trading account assets” and “Other long-term investments.”

As of June 30, 2009, invested assets held outside the general account in other entities and operations include available for sale residential mortgage-backed securities with amortized cost of $741 million and fair value of $760 million, virtually all of which have credit ratings of AAA, and available for sale commercial mortgage-backed securities with amortized cost of $67 million and fair value of $64 million, 90% of which have credit ratings of A or better and the remaining 10% of which have credit ratings of BB and below. An additional $1 million of commercial mortgage-backed securities held outside the general account are classified as other trading account assets as of June 30, 2009 all of which have AAA credit ratings.

As of June 30, 2009, invested assets held outside the general account in other entities and operations also includes available for sale asset-backed securities with amortized cost of $238 million and fair value of $229 million. Based on amortized cost, 85% have credit ratings of AAA, 1% have AA credit ratings, 1% have A credit ratings and the remaining 13% have BBB or below credit ratings. Included within these asset-backed securities as of June 30, 2009, are securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages with amortized cost and fair value of $1 million, all of which have AAA credit ratings, primarily in the 2006 vintage. As of June 30, 2009, there was $21 million in collateralized debt obligations held outside the general account in other entities and operations. An additional $21 million of asset-backed securities held outside the general account as of June 30, 2009 are classified as other trading account assets, 98% of which have credit ratings of AAA and 2% of which have credit ratings of B.

238

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Extraordinary Market Conditions and their Impact on our Liquidity and Capital Resources

The disruptions in the capital markets that began in the latter half of 2007, initially due to concerns over sub-prime mortgage holdings of financial institutions, accelerated to unprecedented levels in 2008, resulting in failure, consolidation, or U.S. federal government intervention on behalf of several significant financial institutions. The ensuing volatility in markets, and the adverse impact on availability and cost of credit and capital, have largely continued into 2009. We, like other financial institutions, have not been immune to these events.

As a consequence of the market dislocation and in order to manage our liquidity and capital resources, we undertook certain actions during 2008 that enabled us to maintain capital at December 31, 2008 consistent with our ratings objectives, and to maintain sufficient liquidity and capital flexibility. Those actions are described in more detail in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Due to the continuation of the market dislocation, we undertook certain additional actions to strengthen our liquidity and capital position during the first half of 2009, including the following: (1) issued 36,858,975 shares of Prudential Financial Common Stock in a public offering (at a price of $39.00 per share for gross proceeds of $1.438 billion) and $1 billion of medium-term notes; (2) made capital contributions and capital loans to our international insurance operations in Japan totaling $366 million; (3) borrowed $1.5 billion from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York in the form of collateralized funding agreements, which was subsequently used to replace inter-company funding agreements between Prudential Insurance and Prudential Financial, previously funded through proceeds from the sale of Prudential Financial’s retail medium-term notes, making the corresponding proceeds from prior sales of retail medium-term notes available to Prudential Financial for general corporate purposes; (4) reduced our reliance on commercial paper issued by Prudential Funding, LLC; (5) undertook sales of assets held by some of our affiliates to reduce their borrowing needs; (6) realized gains from certain derivative positions, including those related to the U.S. dollar denominated products co-insured from our Japanese insurance operations; and (7) acquired assets that would be eligible to be pledged as collateral to the FHLBNY. While the above actions have strengthened our liquidity and capital position, certain of them, as well as our decision to maintain higher levels of cash and short-term investments than in prior periods, have prevented us from investing our resources in an economically optimal manner.

In addition, the following events occurred during the second quarter of 2009: (1) on June 1, 2009, Prudential Financial announced it will not participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program; (2) on June 15, 2009, $1.819 billion of the floating rate convertible senior notes issued in 2007 were repurchased by Prudential Financial at par plus accrued interest as required by the holders under the terms of the notes, using existing cash and short-term investments; and (3) on June 17, 2009, we provided notice to Wells Fargo of our exercise of the “lookback” option put rights under the terms of the joint venture agreements relating to our minority interest in Wachovia Securities.

The Company continues to operate with significant cash on the balance sheet and has access to alternate sources of liquidity, as described below. However, a continuation or worsening of the disruptions in the capital markets could adversely affect Prudential Financial and its subsidiaries’ ability to access sources of liquidity, as well as threaten to reduce our capital below a level that is consistent with our existing ratings objectives. Therefore, we may need to take additional actions beyond those described above, which may include but are not limited to: (1) further access external sources of capital, including the debt or equity markets; (2) reduce or eliminate future shareholder dividends on our Common Stock; (3) utilize further proceeds from our outstanding retail medium-term notes for general corporate purposes by accelerating repayments of additional funding agreements from Prudential Insurance; (4) undertake additional capital management activities, including reinsurance transactions; (5) transfer ownership of certain subsidiaries of Prudential Financial to Prudential Insurance; (6) take additional actions related to derivatives; (7) limit or curtail sales of certain products and/or restructure existing products; (8) effectuate the repayment of affiliate surplus notes; (9) undertake further asset

239

sales or internal asset transfers; and (10) seek temporary or permanent changes to regulatory rules. Certain of these actions may require regulatory approval and/or agreement of counterparties, which are outside of our control, or have economic costs associated with them. In the event that market conditions deteriorate further, we may also be required to make further capital contributions to our regulated domestic or international subsidiaries.

Management monitors the liquidity of Prudential Financial and the Company on a daily basis and projects borrowing and capital needs over a multi-year time horizon through our quarterly planning process. We believe that cash flows from the sources of funds presently available to us are sufficient to satisfy the current liquidity requirements of Prudential Financial, including reasonably foreseeable contingencies.

Prudential Financial

The principal sources of funds available to Prudential Financial, the parent holding company and registrant, to meet its obligations, including the payment of debt service, shareholder dividends, operating expenses, capital contributions and obligations to subsidiaries, are dividends, returns of capital, interest income from its subsidiaries, and cash and short-term investments. These sources of funds may be supplemented by Prudential Financial’s access to the capital markets and bank facilities, as well as the “—Alternative Sources of Liquidity” described below.

As of June 30, 2009, Prudential Financial had cash and short-term investments of $4.735 billion, an increase of $301 million from December 31, 2008. Included in the cash and short-term investments of Prudential Financial is $701 million held in an intercompany liquidity account that is designed to optimize the use of cash by facilitating the lending and borrowing of funds between Prudential Financial and its affiliates on a daily basis. Short-term investments comprise $1.620 billion of Prudential Financial’s total cash and short-term investments and consist primarily of government agency securities and money market funds.

Prudential Financial’s principal sources and uses of cash and short-term investments for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
	(in millions)
Sources:
Dividends and/or returns of capital from subsidiaries(1)	$	1,009
Net proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock(2)		1,391
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term senior debt, net of repayments(2)		770
Repayment of funding agreements from Prudential Insurance(3)		1,251
Net receipts under intercompany loan agreements(4)		213
Proceeds from stock-based compensation and exercise of stock options		99

Total sources		4,733

Uses:
Capital contributions to subsidiaries(5)		638
Shareholder dividends(6)		37
Repayment of short-term debt, net of issuances(7)		1,568
Repayment of retail medium term notes(2)		67
Repayment of floating rate convertible senior notes(2)		2,056
Other, net		66

Total uses		4,432

Net increase in cash and short-term investments	$	301

(1)

Includes dividends and/or returns of capital of $867 million from international insurance and investments subsidiaries, including the repayment of capital loans which were refinanced from internal sources in connection with the maturity of ¥74 billion borrowed under unsecured bridge loan facilities, $137 million from asset management subsidiaries and $5 million from other subsidiaries.

240

(2)	See “—Financing Activities.”

(3)	See “—Prudential Financial—Alternative Sources of Liquidity—Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.”

(4)

Includes net repayment of loans of $376 million by asset management subsidiaries and $115 million by international insurance subsidiaries, partially offset by net borrowings of $298 million by real estate and relocation services business and $140 million by Pruco Reinsurance. The remainder represents loans and repayments from other subsidiaries.

(5)	Includes capital contributions of $477 million to international insurance and investments subsidiaries, $67 million to asset management subsidiaries and $94 million to other subsidiaries.

(6)	Represents payments of Common Stock dividends made in the first half of 2009 with respect to the dividend declared in 2008.

(7)	Includes repayment at maturity of ¥74 billion borrowed under unsecured bridge loan facilities as discussed in “—Financing Activities” and a decrease in outstanding commercial paper as discussed in “—Prudential Financial—Alternative Sources of Liquidity—Commercial Paper Programs.”

Prudential Financial is a holding company whose principal assets are its investments in subsidiaries. We believe Prudential Financial’s capitalization and use of financial leverage are consistent with its ratings targets. Our long-term senior debt credit rating targets for Prudential Financial are “A” for Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, or S&P, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., or Moody’s, and Fitch Ratings Ltd., or Fitch, and “a” for A.M. Best Company, or A.M. Best. Our financial strength rating targets for our domestic life insurance companies are “AA/Aa/AA” for S&P, Moody’s and Fitch, respectively, and “A+” for A.M. Best. For our current ratings (some of which are below these targets), a description of material rating actions that occurred in 2009, and a discussion of the potential impacts of further ratings downgrades, see “—Ratings.” We seek to capitalize all of our subsidiaries and businesses in accordance with their ratings targets.

The primary components of capitalization for the Financial Services Businesses consist of the equity we attribute to the Financial Services Businesses (excluding accumulated other comprehensive income related to unrealized gains and losses on investments and pension and postretirement benefits), outstanding junior subordinated debt and outstanding capital debt of the Financial Services Businesses, as discussed below under “—Financing Activities.” Based on these components, the capital position of the Financial Services Businesses as of June 30, 2009 was as follows:


	June 30, 2009
	(in millions)
Attributed equity (excluding unrealized gains and losses on investments and pension/postretirement benefits)	$	22,452
Junior subordinated debt (hybrid securities)(1)		1,518
Capital debt(1)		6,486

Total capital	$	30,456

(1)	Our capital debt to total capital ratio was 22.5% as of June 30, 2009. For the purpose of calculating this ratio, 75% of the hybrid securities are attributed equity credit, with the remaining 25% treated as capital debt.

As shown in the table above, as of June 30, 2009, the Financial Services Businesses had $30.5 billion in capital, all of which was available to support the aggregate capital requirements of its three divisions and its Corporate and Other operations. Based on our assessments of these businesses and operations, we believe this level of capital was consistent with the “AA” ratings targets of our regulated operating entities as of June 30, 2009.

241

TARP. The TARP Capital Purchase Program involves the issuance by qualifying institutions of preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock to the U.S. Treasury. Concurrently, with the announcement of the TARP Capital Purchase Program in coordination with the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, announced the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, through which it guarantees certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by FDIC insured institutions and their qualifying holding companies, as well as funds over $250,000 in non-interest-bearing transaction deposit accounts. In addition, since March 2008, the Federal Reserve has created several lending facilities to stabilize financial markets, including the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF. The TALF is designed to provide secured financing for certain types of asset-backed securities, including (as of July 2009) certain high-quality commercial mortgage-backed securities issued before January 1, 2009.

On February 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced a Financial Stability Plan to build upon existing programs and earmark the second $350 billion of funds that were authorized under the EESA and released in January 2009. The elements of the Financial Stability Plan, as described by the U.S. Treasury, are a Capital Assistance Program and Financial Stability Trust to make capital available to financial institutions through additional purchases of preferred stock, a Public-Private Investment Program, or PPIP, to buy legacy loans and assets from financial institutions, a Consumer and Business Lending Initiative to restart securitization markets for loans to consumers and businesses by expanding upon TALF, and a comprehensive housing program to, among other things, help reduce mortgage payments and interest rates. The U.S. Treasury has stated that the Financial Stability Plan will require high levels of transparency and accountability standards and dividend, acquisition and executive compensation restrictions for financial institutions that receive government assistance going forward.

We applied in October 2008 to participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program and on May 14, 2009, we received preliminary approval from the U.S. Treasury to participate in the Program. However, on June 1, 2009, we announced that we would not participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2009, we began participating in TALF as an eligible borrower as discussed in more detail in “—Financing Activities—Consolidated Borrowings.” We continue to evaluate other government sponsored programs for which we may be eligible.

In addition to the foregoing, the U.S. federal government, as well as foreign governments and central banks, have taken or are considering taking other actions to address the financial market dislocation. We cannot predict with any certainty whether these actions will be effective or the effect they may have on the financial markets, or on our businesses, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Restrictions on Dividends and Returns of Capital from Subsidiaries

Our insurance and various other companies are subject to regulatory limitations on the payment of dividends and other transfers of funds to affiliates. With respect to Prudential Insurance, New Jersey insurance law provides that, except in the case of extraordinary dividends or distributions, all dividends or distributions paid by Prudential Insurance may be declared or paid only from unassigned surplus, as determined pursuant to statutory accounting principles, less unrealized investment gains and losses and revaluation of assets. As of December 31, 2008, Prudential Insurance’s unassigned surplus was $2.781 billion, and it recorded applicable adjustments for cumulative unrealized investment gains of $283 million. Prudential Insurance must also notify the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance of its intent to pay a dividend or distribution. If the dividend or distribution, together with other dividends or distributions made within the preceding twelve months, exceeds a specified statutory limit it is considered an extraordinary dividend or distribution and Prudential Insurance must obtain the prior non-disapproval of the Department. The current statutory limitation applicable to New Jersey life insurers is generally the greater of 10% of the prior calendar year’s statutory surplus, which surplus was $6.432 billion as of December 31, 2008, or the prior calendar year’s statutory net gain from operations excluding realized investment gains and losses, $498 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Prudential Insurance and our other insurance subsidiaries may also be subject to additional company specific regulatory limitations

242

and adjustments. In addition to these regulatory limitations, the terms of the IHC debt contain restrictions potentially limiting dividends by Prudential Insurance applicable to the Financial Services Businesses in the event the Closed Block Business is in financial distress and under certain other circumstances.

We anticipate that, unless market conditions improve, dividends from Prudential Insurance will either not be available or will be substantially constrained in 2009 by the capital requirements of our financial strength rating targets. In 2008, Prudential Insurance declared an ordinary dividend of $727 million and an extraordinary dividend of $773 million to Prudential Holdings, LLC, which were in turn distributed to Prudential Financial.

The laws regulating dividends of the other states and foreign jurisdictions where our other insurance companies are domiciled are similar, but not identical, to New Jersey’s. Pursuant to Gibraltar Life’s reorganization, in addition to regulatory restrictions, there are certain other restrictions on Gibraltar Life’s ability to pay dividends to Prudential Financial. We anticipate that it will be several years before these restrictions will allow Gibraltar Life to pay such dividends. There are also regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by The Prudential Life Insurance Company, Ltd., or Prudential of Japan, which began paying dividends in 2006. Further, current market conditions have impacted capital positions of our international insurance companies, which could further restrict their ability to pay dividends. The ability of our asset management subsidiaries, and the majority of our other operating subsidiaries, to pay dividends is largely unrestricted.

See “Liquidity and Capital Resources of Subsidiaries” below for additional details on the liquidity of our domestic insurance subsidiaries, international insurance subsidiaries and asset management subsidiaries.

Alternative Sources of Liquidity

Prudential Financial maintains an intercompany liquidity account that is designed to optimize the use of cash by facilitating the lending and borrowing of funds between the parent holding company and its affiliates on a daily basis. Depending on the overall availability of cash, the parent holding company invests excess cash on a short-term basis or borrows funds in the capital markets. Additional longer term liquidity is available through inter-affiliate borrowing arrangements. Prudential Financial and certain of its subsidiaries also have access to bank facilities, as discussed under “—Lines of Credit and Other Credit Facilities,” as well as the other alternative sources of liquidity described below.

Commercial Paper Programs

Prudential Financial has a commercial paper program currently rated “A-1” by S&P, “P-2” by Moody’s and “F2” by Fitch with a current authorized capacity of $5.0 billion. The rating from Fitch currently has a negative outlook. Prudential Financial commercial paper borrowings have been generally used to fund the working capital needs of Prudential Financial’s subsidiaries and provide short-term liquidity at Prudential Financial. Prudential Financial’s outstanding commercial paper borrowings were $505 million as of June 30, 2009, with a weighted average maturity of 10 days of which 40% was overnight. This represents a decrease of $738 million from December 31, 2008, largely due to the repayment of maturing commercial paper issued under the CPFF program, described below. As of June 30, 2009, the vast majority of the proceeds of this outstanding commercial paper was either held in cash or invested in short-term financial instruments. The daily average commercial paper outstanding during the first half of 2009 under this program was $819 million. The weighted average interest rate on these borrowings was 2.01% and 3.55% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Prudential Funding, LLC, or Prudential Funding, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Insurance, has a commercial paper program, currently rated “A-1+” by S&P, “P-1” by Moody’s and “F1” by Fitch with a current authorized capacity of $12.0 billion. The rating from Moody’s is currently on review for a possible downgrade and the Fitch rating has a negative outlook. Prudential Funding’s outstanding commercial paper and master note borrowings were $1.718 billion as of June 30, 2009, with a weighted average maturity of 38 days of which 11% was overnight. This represents a decrease of $2.636 billion from December 31, 2008, largely due to a reduction

243

in the investment in our enhanced short-term portfolio and repayment of loans by our affiliates, funded through a combination of asset sales, substitute funding from Prudential Financial from the proceeds of the medium-term notes issued in June 2009, and other internal sources of cash. As of June 30, 2009, $577 million of the proceeds of this outstanding commercial paper were held in cash and cash equivalents, while the remaining $1.141 billion was primarily utilized to fund short-term cash flow timing mismatches and the working capital needs of our affiliates. The daily average commercial paper outstanding during the first half of 2009 under this program was $3.521 billion. The weighted average interest rates on these borrowings were 0.86% and 2.85% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Prudential Financial has issued a subordinated guarantee covering Prudential Funding’s domestic commercial paper program.

Both Prudential Financial’s and Prudential Funding’s commercial paper programs were granted approval to participate in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Commercial Paper Funding Facility, or CPFF, during the fourth quarter of 2008. The CPFF is intended to improve liquidity in short-term funding markets by increasing the availability of term commercial paper funding to issuers and by providing greater assurance to both issuers and investors that firms will be able to roll over their maturing commercial paper. Commercial paper programs must maintain ratings of at least A-1/P-1/F1 by at least two rating agencies in order to be eligible for the CPFF. Unsecured commercial paper issued under the CPFF is discounted based on a rate equal to a spread (200 basis points) over the three-month overnight index swap rate on the day of purchase. Access to the CPFF for the issuance of new commercial paper is scheduled to terminate on February 1, 2010, unless such date is extended by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

As of June 30, 2009, neither Prudential Financial nor Prudential Funding had any commercial paper outstanding under the CPFF. On February 19, 2009, the commercial paper credit rating of Prudential Financial was downgraded by Fitch from F1 to F2. Consequently, as of that date, Prudential Financial became ineligible to issue commercial paper under the CPFF. However, Prudential Funding continues to be an eligible issuer under the CPFF based on its current credit ratings and may sell to the CPFF three-month unsecured U.S. dollar denominated commercial paper up to a maximum of $9.815 billion, less the outstanding amount of any non-CPFF commercial paper at any applicable time.

Despite the recent improvement in the short-term funding markets, Prudential still faces some challenges due to liquidity and credit constraints that exist in the general market. Rating agency actions during the same period have additionally impacted our commercial paper programs. As a result, the financing cost of Prudential Financial commercial paper increased versus its historical cost basis relative to the target federal funds rate, as investors demanded a premium for such “top-tier split” rated commercial paper. The financing cost of Prudential Funding commercial paper increased as well versus its historical cost basis relative to the target federal funds rate over the same period. Additionally, we have also experienced a reduction in investor demand for both of our commercial paper programs.

While we consider availability of commercial paper as one of our alternative sources of liquidity, we have continued to reduce our reliance on commercial paper to fund our operations, and have developed plans which would enable us to further reduce, or if necessary eliminate, our borrowings under the Prudential Financial and Prudential Funding commercial paper programs, through the use of other sources of liquidity.

Both commercial paper programs are backed by our unsecured committed lines of credit. As of June 30, 2009, Prudential Financial, Prudential Insurance and Prudential Funding had unsecured committed lines of credit totaling $4.34 billion. There were no outstanding borrowings under these facilities as of June 30, 2009. For a further discussion of lines of credit, see “—Lines of Credit and Other Credit Facilities.”

244

Asset-based Financing

We conduct asset-based or secured financing within our insurance and other subsidiaries, including transactions such as securities lending and repurchase agreements, in order to earn spread income, to borrow funds, or to facilitate trading activity. These programs are driven by portfolio holdings in securities that are lendable based on counterparty demand for these securities in the marketplace. The collateral received in connection with these programs is primarily used to purchase securities in the short-term spread portfolios of our domestic insurance entities. Investments held in the short-term spread portfolios include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and fixed maturities, including mortgage- and asset-backed securities, with a weighted average life at time of purchase of two years or less. A portion of the asset-backed securities held in our short-term spread portfolios, including our enhanced short-term portfolio, are collateralized by sub-prime mortgages. See “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—General Account Investments—Fixed Maturity Securities” for a further discussion of our asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime holdings, including details regarding those securities held in our enhanced short-term portfolio. These short-term portfolios are subject to specific investment policy statements, which among other things, do not allow for significant asset/liability interest rate duration mismatch.

As of June 30, 2009, our Financial Services Businesses had liabilities totaling $5.929 billion under such programs, including $3.467 billion representing securities sold under agreements to repurchase, $2.233 billion representing cash collateral for loaned securities and $229 million representing securities sold but not yet purchased. Of the $5.929 billion for the Financial Services Businesses as of June 30, 2009, $2.795 billion represents securities that may be returned to the company overnight requiring immediate return of the cash collateral, and the remainder has maturities ranging from 2 days to 3 months with a weighted average maturity of 34 days. As of December 31, 2008, our Financial Services Businesses had liabilities totaling $7.455 billion under such programs.

As of June 30, 2009, our Closed Block Business had liabilities totaling $5.130 billion under such programs, including $3.701 billion representing securities sold under agreements to repurchase and $1.429 billion representing cash collateral for loaned securities. Of the $5.130 billion for the Closed Block Business as of June 30, 2009, $2.369 billion represents securities that may be returned to the company overnight requiring immediate return of the cash collateral, and the remainder has maturities ranging from 2 days to 3 months with a weighted average maturity of 31 days. As of December 31, 2008, our Closed Block Business had liabilities totaling $5.096 billion under such programs.

As of June 30, 2009, our domestic insurance entities had assets eligible for the lending program of $66.8 billion, of which $9.9 billion were on loan. Taking into account market conditions and outstanding loan balances as of June 30, 2009, we believe approximately $18.0 billion of the remaining eligible assets are readily lendable, of which approximately $12.5 billion relates to the Financial Services Business. Further changes in market conditions can affect the ability to lend the available assets.

As referenced above, these programs are typically limited to securities in demand that can be loaned at relatively low financing rates. As such, we believe there is unused capacity available through these programs. Holdings of cash and cash equivalent investments in these short-term spread portfolios allow for further flexibility in sizing the portfolio to better match available financing. Current conditions in both the financing and investment markets are continuously monitored in order to appropriately manage the cost of funds, investment spreads, asset/liability duration matching and liquidity.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York

245

in FHLBNY requires us to maintain ownership of member stock, and borrowings from FHLBNY require us to purchase FHLBNY activity based stock in an amount equal to 4.5% of outstanding borrowings. Under FHLBNY guidelines, borrowings by its members are at the discretion of the FHLBNY.

The FHLBNY requires Prudential Insurance to pledge qualifying mortgage-related assets or U.S. Treasury securities as collateral for all borrowings. On May 8, 2009, the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, or NJDOBI, revised its prior guidance to increase the maximum amount of qualifying assets that Prudential Insurance may pledge as collateral to the FHLBNY from 5% to 7% of its prior year-end statutory net admitted assets exclusive of separate account assets; however, this limitation resets to 5% on December 31, 2010 unless extended by NJDOBI. Based on its statutory net admitted assets as of December 31, 2008, the 7% limitation equates to a maximum amount of pledged assets of $10.5 billion and an estimated maximum borrowing capacity, after taking into account applicable required collateralization levels and required purchases of activity based FHLBNY stock, of approximately $9.0 billion. However, the ability to borrow from the FHLBNY is subject to the availability and maintenance of qualifying assets at Prudential Insurance, and there is no assurance that Prudential Insurance will have sufficient qualifying assets available to it in order to access the increased capacity in full at any particular time. Also, the revised guidance from NJDOBI limits the aggregate amount of assets Prudential Insurance may pledge for all loans, including borrowings from the FHLBNY, to 10% of its prior year-end statutory net admitted assets exclusive of separate account assets; however, this limitation excludes certain activities, such as the asset-based financing transactions described above.

The fair value of the qualifying assets pledged as collateral by Prudential Insurance must be maintained at certain specified levels of the borrowed amount, which can vary, depending on the nature of the assets pledged. If the fair value of the collateral declines below these levels or if assets previously pledged cease to qualify under FHLBNY guidelines (such as due to ratings downgrades on mortgage-backed securities), Prudential Insurance could be required to pledge additional collateral or repay outstanding borrowings. If at the time of a proposed borrowing, or at a time when required to pledge additional collateral in respect of outstanding borrowings, Prudential Insurance had insufficient qualifying assets, it would need to obtain and pledge additional mortgage-related assets and/or Treasury securities through asset purchases, reacquiring assets on loan or otherwise, subject to availability on appropriate terms. As of June 30, 2009, we had pledged qualifying assets with a fair value of $7.439 billion, which would have allowed us to borrow up to approximately $6.8 billion. As of that date, our actual borrowings outstanding, in the form of collateralized advances and collateralized funding agreements, were $3.5 billion. The additional collateral provides us the flexibility for further borrowings, and obviates the need for periodic collateral true-ups due to volatility in the fair value of the pledged assets or assets previously pledged ceasing to qualify as collateral under FHLBNY guidelines.

In February and March 2009, Prudential Insurance issued collateralized funding agreements in an aggregate amount of $1.5 billion to the FHLBNY. The funding agreements, which are reflected in “Policyholders’ account balances,” have priority claim status above debt holders of Prudential Insurance. These funding agreements currently serve as a substitute funding source for a product of our Retirement segment for which we earn investment spread that was previously funded by retail medium-term notes issued by Prudential Financial. This substitution allows Prudential Financial to use the proceeds from the sale of the corresponding retail medium-term notes for general corporate purposes. To effect the substitution, during the first and second quarters of 2009, $1.015 billion and $507 million, respectively, of intercompany funding agreements that were previously issued by Prudential Insurance to Prudential Financial were terminated for payments of $730 million and $491 million, respectively, from Prudential Insurance to Prudential Financial. These payments represent the fair value of the funding agreements on the date of termination. We may conduct similar transactions, or take other actions, in future periods in order to utilize additional retail medium-term notes proceeds for general corporate purposes.

In addition, as of June 30, 2009, $1.0 billion of the FHLBNY advances outstanding are reflected in “Long-term debt,” and have a maturity of December 6, 2010, and $1.0 billion is reflected in “Short-term debt.” As of June 30, 2009, proceeds from these advances of $0.2 billion were invested in cash and short-term investments at Prudential Insurance, $1.2 billion were used to support the operating needs of our businesses, $0.3 billion were

246

used as a replacement source of funding for a portion of capital requirements of Gibraltar Life, previously funded through foreign currency denominated unsecured bridge loan facilities, and the balance was used to purchase investments, including the requisite FHLBNY activity based stock.

Prudential Insurance may, from time to time, borrow additional funds from FHLBNY for purposes of managing liquidity, making operating loans to affiliates, asset/liability management, or issuance of funding agreements. Under FHLBNY guidelines, if Prudential Insurance’s claims-paying ratings decline below certain levels, and the FHLBNY does not receive written assurances from NJDOBI regarding Prudential Insurance’s solvency, new borrowings from the FHLBNY would be limited to a term of 90 days or less. Currently, Prudential Insurance’s ratings are at or above the required minimum levels, and, as a result, there is no restriction on the term of borrowings from the FHLBNY.

Economic Capital

We are in the process of developing an economic capital framework, and have begun using economic capital as an additional source of information for our business decisions. As we continue developing the framework, we will be assessing our overall capital position using both economic capital and our current framework, which is primarily based on statutory risk based capital measures.

Liquidity and Capital Resources of Subsidiaries

Domestic Insurance Subsidiaries

General Liquidity

Liquidity refers to a company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the needs of its operations. We manage the liquidity of our domestic insurance operations to ensure stable, reliable and cost-effective sources of cash flows to meet all of our obligations. Liquidity is provided by a variety of sources, as described more fully below, including portfolios of liquid assets. The investment portfolios of our domestic operations are integral to the overall liquidity of those operations. We segment our investment portfolios and employ an asset/liability management approach specific to the requirements of our product lines. This enhances the discipline applied in managing the liquidity, as well as the interest rate and credit risk profiles, of each portfolio in a manner consistent with the unique characteristics of the product liabilities. We use a projection process for cash flows from operations to ensure sufficient liquidity is available to meet projected cash outflows, including claims.

Liquidity is measured against internally developed benchmarks that take into account the characteristics of both the asset portfolio and the liabilities that they support. The results are affected substantially by the overall asset type and quality of our investments.

We have received a request pursuant to the documentation for the disposition of our property and casualty operations completed in 2003 to deposit into a trust cash or securities for the purpose of securing insurance liabilities that were to have been transferred to Prudential Insurance following completion of the disposition but that have not been so transferred. We estimate that the amount of cash or securities to be deposited is approximately $500 million, and we are allowed to satisfy a portion of this requirement through the deposit of promissory notes received from the purchaser at the time of the disposition. We believe that the deposit of these assets would not be a material liquidity event for Prudential Insurance.

Cash Flow

The principal sources of liquidity for Prudential Insurance and our other domestic insurance subsidiaries are premiums and annuity considerations, investment and fee income, and investment maturities and sales associated with our insurance and annuity operations, as well as internal and external borrowings. The principal uses of that liquidity include benefits, claims, dividends paid to policyholders, and payments to policyholders and

247

contractholders in connection with surrenders, withdrawals and net policy loan activity. Other uses of liquidity include commissions, general and administrative expenses, purchases of investments, and payments in connection with financing activities.

We believe that the cash flows from our insurance and annuity operations are adequate to satisfy the current liquidity requirements of these operations, including under reasonably foreseeable stress scenarios. The continued adequacy of this liquidity will depend upon factors such as future securities market conditions, changes in interest rate levels, policyholder perceptions of our financial strength, and the relative safety of competing products (including those with enhancements under EESA), each of which could lead to reduced cash inflows or increased cash outflows. In addition, market volatility can impact the level of capital required to support our businesses, particularly in our annuity business. Our domestic insurance operations’ cash flows from investment activities result from repayments of principal, proceeds from maturities and sales of invested assets and investment income, net of amounts reinvested. The primary liquidity risks with respect to these cash flows are the risk of default by debtors or bond insurers, our counterparties’ willingness to extend repurchase and/or securities lending arrangements, commitments to invest and market volatility. We closely manage these risks through our credit risk management process and regular monitoring of our liquidity position.

In managing the liquidity of our domestic insurance operations, we also consider the risk of policyholder and contractholder withdrawals of funds earlier than our assumptions when selecting assets to support these contractual obligations. We use surrender charges and other contract provisions to mitigate the extent, timing and profitability impact of withdrawals of funds by customers from annuity contracts and deposit liabilities. The following table sets forth withdrawal characteristics of our general account annuity reserves and deposit liabilities (based on statutory liability values) as of the dates indicated.


	June 30, 2009				December 31, 2008
	Amount		% of Total		Amount		% of Total
	($ in millions)
Not subject to discretionary withdrawal provisions	$	36,613	46	%	$	36,880	47	%

Subject to discretionary withdrawal, with adjustment:
With market value adjustment		20,661	26			20,341	26
At market value		1,484	2			1,279	2
At contract value, less surrender charge of 5% or more		4,076	5			4,048	5

Subtotal		62,834	79			62,548	80
Subject to discretionary withdrawal at contract value with no surrender charge or surrender charge of less than 5%		16,212	21			15,906	20

Total annuity reserves and deposit liabilities	$	79,046	100	%	$	78,454	100	%

Individual life insurance policies are less susceptible to withdrawal than our annuity reserves and deposit liabilities because policyholders may incur surrender charges and be subject to a new underwriting process in order to obtain a new insurance policy. Our annuity reserves with guarantee features may be less susceptible to withdrawal than historical experience indicates, due to the current value of these guarantee features to policyholders as a result of recent market declines. Annuity benefits under group annuity contracts are generally not subject to early withdrawal. Gross account withdrawals for our domestic insurance operations’ products were consistent with our assumptions in asset/liability management and the associated cash outflows did not have a material adverse impact on our overall liquidity.

Liquid Assets

Liquid assets include cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, fixed maturities that are not designated as held to maturity and public equity securities. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our domestic insurance operations had liquid assets of $125.3 billion and $125.4 billion, respectively, which includes a portion

248

financed with asset-based financing. The portion of liquid assets comprised of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was $9.5 billion and $10.7 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, $98.6 billion, or 87%, of the fixed maturity investments that are not designated as held to maturity within our domestic insurance company general account portfolios were rated investment grade. The remaining $14.4 billion, or 13%, of these fixed maturity investments were rated non-investment grade. We consider attributes of the various categories of liquid assets (for example, type of asset and credit quality) in calculating internal liquidity measures in order to evaluate the adequacy of our domestic insurance operations’ liquidity under a variety of stress scenarios. We believe that the liquidity profile of our assets is sufficient to satisfy current liquidity requirements, including under foreseeable stress scenarios.

Given the size and liquidity profile of our investment portfolios, we believe that claim experience varying from our projections does not constitute a significant liquidity risk. Our asset/liability management process takes into account the expected maturity of investments and expected claim payments as well as the specific nature and risk profile of the liabilities. Historically, there has been no significant variation between the expected maturities of our investments and the payment of claims.

Our domestic insurance companies’ liquidity is managed through access to substantial investment portfolios as well as a variety of instruments available for funding and/or managing short-term cash flow mismatches, including from time to time those arising from claim levels in excess of projections. To the extent we need to pay claims in excess of projections, we may borrow temporarily or sell investments sooner than anticipated to pay these claims, which may result in increased borrowing costs or realized investment gains or losses affecting results of operations. For a further discussion of realized investment gains or losses, see “—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Realized Investment Gains and Losses.” We believe that borrowing temporarily or selling investments earlier than anticipated will not have a material impact on the liquidity of our domestic insurance companies. Payment of claims and sale of investments earlier than anticipated would have an impact on the reported level of cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities, respectively, in our financial statements. Instead of selling investments at depressed market prices externally, in order to preserve economic value (including tax attributes), we may also sell investments from one subsidiary to another at fair market value or transfer investments internally between businesses within the same subsidiary.

Prudential Funding, LLC

Prudential Funding, LLC, or Prudential Funding, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Insurance, serves as an additional source of financing to meet the working capital needs of Prudential Insurance and its subsidiaries. Prudential Funding also lends to other subsidiaries of Prudential Financial up to limits established with the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance. To the extent that other subsidiaries of Prudential Financial have financing needs in excess of these limits, these needs are met through financing from Prudential Financial directly or from third parties. Prudential Funding operates under a support agreement with Prudential Insurance whereby Prudential Insurance has agreed to maintain Prudential Funding’s positive tangible net worth at all times. Prudential Financial has also issued a subordinated guarantee covering Prudential Funding’s domestic commercial paper program. Prudential Funding borrows funds primarily through the direct issuance of commercial paper. Prudential Funding’s outstanding commercial paper, including master note borrowings, were $1.718 billion as of June 30, 2009 and $4.354 billion as of December 31, 2008, and are more fully discussed in “—Alternate Sources of Liquidity.” The impact of Prudential Funding’s financing capacity on liquidity is considered in the internal liquidity measures of the domestic insurance operations.

The total principal amount of debt outstanding under Prudential Funding’s domestic medium-term note programs was $172 million as of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The weighted average interest rates on Prudential Funding’s long-term debt, including the effect of interest rate hedging activity, were 1.41%, and 4.46% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

249

Capital

The Risk Based Capital, or RBC, ratio is a primary measure by which we evaluate the capital adequacy of Prudential Insurance and our other domestic life insurance subsidiaries, which includes businesses in both the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. We manage Prudential Insurance’s RBC ratio to a level consistent with a “AA” ratings target. RBC is determined by statutory guidelines and formulas that consider, among other things, risks related to the type and quality of the invested assets, insurance-related risks associated with an insurer’s products and liabilities, interest rate risks and general business risks. The RBC ratio calculations are intended to assist insurance regulators in measuring the adequacy of an insurer’s statutory capitalization. The reporting of RBC measures is not intended for the purpose of ranking any insurance company or for use in connection with any marketing, advertising or promotional activities. Prudential Insurance reported an RBC ratio of 452% as of December 31, 2008. The RBC ratio is an annual calculation; however, based upon June 30, 2009 amounts, we estimate that the RBC ratios for Prudential Insurance and our other domestic life insurance subsidiaries would exceed the minimum level required by applicable insurance regulations.

The level of statutory capital of our domestic life insurance subsidiaries can be materially impacted by interest rate and equity market fluctuations, changes in the values of derivatives, the level of impairments recorded, and credit quality migration, among other items. The level of statutory capital of our domestic life insurance subsidiaries is affected by statutory accounting rules, including those for loan-backed and structured securities. Mandatory adoption of changes to the rules for loan-backed and structured securities was recently deferred until periods ending on or after September 30, 2009. Further changes to these rules by insurance regulators, or the timing of the Company’s application of these rules, are possible, given the deferral and other uncertainty around the resolution of these accounting rules.

The implementation of VACARVM, a new statutory reserve methodology for variable annuities with guaranteed benefits, effective December 31, 2009 is not expected to have a material impact on the statutory surplus of our domestic life insurance subsidiaries. However, VACARVM is expected to result in higher statutory reserves ceded to our offshore captive reinsurance company, which we currently anticipate will increase statutory reserve credit requirements by approximately $1.0 billion from December 31, 2008. Several strategies are currently under review to meet the increased statutory reserve credit requirement. The activities we may undertake to mitigate or address these needs include obtaining letters of credit, executing capital market strategies, or holding assets equal to the statutory reserve credit in a trust. However, our ability to successfully execute these strategies may depend on market or other conditions.

Prudential Securities Group

As a result of the negative impact of market dislocations on capital levels within Prudential Insurance experienced during 2008, we contributed Prudential Securities Group, LLC to Prudential Insurance to strengthen capital during the fourth quarter of 2008. This contribution increased Prudential Insurance’s net admitted assets by $2.2 billion.

Prudential Securities Group owns our investment in the Wachovia Securities joint venture, which we account for under the equity method, as well as other wholly owned businesses, principally our global commodities group. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Prudential Securities Group’s assets totaled $7.3 billion and $10.4 billion, respectively. Distributions from our investment in Wachovia Securities to Prudential Securities Group totaled $104 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. There have been no distributions in 2009.

On July 1, 2003, we combined our retail securities brokerage and clearing operations with those of Wachovia Corporation (“Wachovia”) and formed Wachovia Securities, a joint venture currently headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. On October 1, 2007, Wachovia completed the acquisition of A.G. Edwards, Inc. and on January 1, 2008 contributed the retail securities brokerage business of A.G. Edwards to the joint venture. Wachovia’s contribution of this business entitled us to elect a “lookback” option (which we elected) permitting

250

us to delay for a period of two years ending on January 1, 2010 our decision whether or not to make payments to avoid or limit dilution of our initial 38% ownership interest in the joint venture or, alternatively, to “put” our joint venture interests to Wachovia based on the appraised value of the joint venture, excluding the A.G. Edwards business, as of January 1, 2008. Subsequently, Wachovia was acquired by Wells Fargo, which succeeded to the rights and obligations of Wachovia under the joint venture agreements. Wachovia Securities is now using the Wells Fargo Advisors name.

On December 4, 2008, we announced our intention to exercise our right under the “lookback” option to put our joint venture interests to Wells Fargo. On June 17, 2009, we provided notice to Wells Fargo of our exercise of our “lookback” put rights. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, we expect that the closing of the put transaction would occur on or about January 1, 2010.

The other wholly-owned businesses in Prudential Securities Group, principally our global commodities group, continue to maintain sufficiently liquid balance sheets, consisting mostly of cash and cash equivalents, segregated client assets, and short-term receivables from clients, broker-dealers, and exchanges. As registered broker-dealers and members of various self-regulatory organizations, our U.S. registered broker-dealer subsidiaries and Wachovia Securities are subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule, as well as the net capital requirements of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the various securities and commodities exchanges of which they are members. Compliance with these capital requirements could limit the ability of these operations to pay dividends.

251

International Insurance and Investments Subsidiaries

In our international insurance operations, liquidity is provided through ongoing operations as well as portfolios of liquid assets. In managing the liquidity and the interest and credit risk profiles of our international insurance portfolios, we employ a discipline similar to the discipline employed for domestic insurance subsidiaries. We monitor liquidity through the use of internal liquidity measures, taking into account the liquidity of the asset portfolios.

As with our domestic operations, in managing the liquidity of these operations, we consider the risk of policyholder and contractholder withdrawals of funds earlier than our assumptions in selecting assets to support these contractual obligations. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our international insurance subsidiaries had total general account insurance related liabilities (other than dividends payable to policyholders) of $67.4 billion and $64.9 billion, respectively. Of those amounts, $37.1 billion and $34.7 billion, respectively, were associated with Gibraltar Life.

Concurrent with our acquisition of Gibraltar Life in April 2001, substantially all of its insurance liabilities were restructured under a plan of reorganization to include special surrender penalties on existing policies. These charges, which were initially 15%, but have gradually declined each year to their current 0% level as of April 2009, were designed to mitigate the extent, timing, and profitability impact of withdrawals of funds by customers. We did not experience any material increases in the level of surrenders due to the expiration of these surrender charges. Policies issued by Gibraltar Life post-acquisition are generally subject to discretionary withdrawal at contract value, less applicable surrender charges, which currently start at 5% or more.

A special dividend to certain Gibraltar Life policyholders was payable in 2005 and the final dividend will be payable in the latter half of 2009. The special dividend is based on 70% of the net increase in the fair value, through March 2009, of certain real estate and loans, net of transaction costs and taxes, included in the Gibraltar Life reorganization plan. As of June 30, 2009, a liability of $458 million related to the special dividend is included in “Policyholders’ dividends.” The special dividend will take the form of additional policy values, and to a lesser extent, cash. Gibraltar Life’s investment portfolio is structured to provide adequate liquidity for the special dividend.

Prudential of Japan had $24.5 billion and $24.9 billion of general account insurance related liabilities, other than dividends to policyholders, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Prudential of Japan did not have a material amount of general account annuity reserves or deposit liabilities subject to discretionary withdrawal as of June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008. Additionally, we believe that the individual life insurance policies sold by Prudential of Japan do not have significant withdrawal risk because policyholders may incur surrender charges and must undergo a new underwriting process in order to obtain a new insurance policy.

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our international insurance subsidiaries had cash and short-term investments of $2.6 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, and fixed maturity investments, other than those designated as held to maturity, with fair values of $50.1 billion and $48.8 billion, respectively. As of June 30, 2009, $48.8 billion, or 97%, of the fixed maturity investments that are not designated as held to maturity within our international insurance subsidiaries were rated investment grade. The remaining $1.3 billion, or 3%, of these fixed maturity investments were rated non-investment grade. Of those amounts, $26.8 billion of the investment grade fixed maturity investments and $0.9 billion of the non-investment grade fixed maturity investments were associated with Gibraltar Life. We consider attributes of the various categories of liquid assets (for example, type of asset and credit quality) in calculating internal liquidity measures to evaluate the adequacy of our international insurance operations’ liquidity under stress scenarios. We believe that ongoing operations and the liquidity profile of our international insurance assets provide sufficient liquidity under reasonably foreseeable stress scenarios.

Similar to the RBC ratios that are employed by U.S. insurance regulators, regulatory authorities in the international jurisdictions in which we operate generally establish some form of minimum solvency margin

252

requirements for insurance companies. All of our international insurance subsidiaries have solvency margins in excess of the minimum levels required by the applicable regulatory authorities. These solvency margins are also the primary measure by which we evaluate the capital adequacy of our international insurance operations. We manage these solvency margins to a capitalization level consistent with our “AA” ratings target. During the fourth quarter of 2008 and continuing into the first quarter of 2009, market conditions negatively impacted the level of capital in our international life insurance subsidiaries, particularly in Japan. To maintain our solvency ratios at or above the desired target level, we made capital contributions and capital loans of $366 million to our Japan life insurance subsidiaries during the first quarter of 2009. Maintenance of our solvency ratios at certain levels is also important to our competitive positioning, as in certain jurisdictions, such as Japan, these solvency margins are required to be disclosed to the public and therefore impact the public perception of an insurer’s financial strength.

We employ various hedging strategies to manage potential exposure to foreign currency exchange rate movements, including the strategies discussed in “—Results of Operations for Financial Services Businesses by Segment—International Insurance and Investments Division.” Cash settlements from these hedging activities result in cash flows to or from Prudential Financial and are dependent on changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the notional amount of the exposures hedged. The cash settlements include those for internal hedges related to U.S. dollar denominated investments held on the books of the yen-based entities, as well as for external hedges. A significant yen appreciation over an extended period of time would result in net cash outflows from Prudential Financial in excess of our historical experience. During the second quarter of 2009, we terminated our hedges of the U.S. GAAP equity exposure of our Korean operations due to a variety of considerations, including a desire to limit the potential for cash settlement outflows that would result from a strengthening Korean won.

In our international investment operations, liquidity is provided through asset management fees as well as commission revenue. The principal uses of liquidity include general and administrative expenses, and distributions of dividends and returns of capital. As with our domestic operations, the primary liquidity risks for our fee based asset management businesses relate to their profitability, which is impacted by market conditions and our investment management performance. We believe cash flows from our international investment subsidiaries are adequate to satisfy the current liquidity requirements of their operations, as well as requirements that could arise under foreseeable stress scenarios, which are monitored through the use of internal measures.

Asset Management Subsidiaries

Our asset management businesses, which include real estate, public and private fixed income and public equity asset management, as well as commercial mortgage origination and servicing, and retail investment products, such as mutual funds and other retail services, are largely unregulated from the standpoint of dividends and distributions. Our asset management subsidiaries through which we conduct these businesses generally do not have restrictions on the amount of distributions they can make, and the fee based asset management business can provide a relatively stable source of cash flow to Prudential Financial.

The principal sources of liquidity for our fee-based asset management businesses include asset management fees and commercial mortgage servicing fees. The principal uses of liquidity include general and administrative expenses, and distribution of dividends and returns of capital to Prudential Financial. The primary liquidity risks for our fee based asset management businesses relate to their profitability, which is impacted by market conditions and our investment management performance. We believe the cash flows from our fee based asset

253

management businesses are adequate to satisfy the current liquidity requirements of their operations, as well as requirements that could arise under foreseeable stress scenarios, which are monitored through the use of internal measures.

The principal sources of liquidity for our proprietary investments and interim loans are cash flows from investments, the ability to liquidate investments, and available borrowing lines from internal sources, including Prudential Funding and Prudential Financial. The primary liquidity risks include the inability to sell assets in a timely manner, declines in the value of assets and credit defaults. The current adverse market conditions have increased the liquidity risks associated with our proprietary investments and interim loans. The markets for certain investments, such as commercial mortgages and real estate, have become less liquid. If we needed to sell these investments, we may have difficulty doing so in a timely manner at a price that we could otherwise realize. In the fourth quarter of 2008, two entities within the Asset Management segment made a request to redeem their entire investment from a proprietary fixed income fund, which aggregate investments were $170 million as of March 31, 2009. In the second quarter of 2009, we transferred $11 million of our investment to an affiliate and the remaining investment was redeemed as of June 30, 2009.

In December 2008, we received approval from the NJDOBI for Prudential Insurance to provide an 18-month $1.5 billion lending facility to our commercial mortgage operation that is collateralized primarily by its interim loan portfolio. As of June 30, 2009, we are in compliance with the loan-to-value covenant of the facility. There is a risk that further deterioration in the collateral pledged under the facility could require posting of additional collateral or a partial pay down of the facility to bring the facility into compliance with its covenants. In December 2008, the facility was executed and the proceeds were used to repay financing provided by Prudential Financial. As of June 30, 2009, $0.8 billion was outstanding under this arrangement.

In April 2009, our commercial mortgage origination and servicing business received approval to participate in a Fannie Mae alternative delivery program known as ASAP Plus (“As Soon as Pooled” delivery). Our approval limit for outstanding balances on ASAP Plus is presently $350 million. This program allows us to assign a qualified Fannie Mae loan trade commitment to Fannie Mae as early as the next business day after a loan closes, and receive 99% of the loan purchase price from Fannie Mae. The program does not eliminate the need to provide temporary warehouse financing, but does significantly reduce the duration of funding requirements for eligible Fannie Mae originated loans from the normal delivery cycle of two to four weeks down to as little as one to two days.

During the first half of 2009, in our proprietary investing business, we received repayments of real estate loans secured by equity commitments from investors and assets of funds managed by us, and we reduced exposure to certain public equity and real estate seed investments. The proceeds of these activities, which totaled $769 million, were used to repay financing provided by Prudential Financial and Prudential Funding.

Certain real estate funds under management are held for the benefit of clients in insurance company separate accounts sponsored by Prudential Insurance. In the normal course of business, these separate accounts enter into purchase commitments which include commitments to purchase real estate, invest in future real estate partnerships, and/or fund additional construction or other expenditures on previously acquired real estate investments. Certain purchases of real estate are contingent on the developer’s development of the real estate according to plans and specifications outlined in a pre-sale agreement or the property achieving a certain level of leasing. Purchase commitments are typically entered into by Prudential Insurance on behalf of the particular separate account and, upon acquisition, are titled either in Prudential Insurance or an LLC subsidiary formed for that purpose. In certain cases, the commitments specify that recourse on the obligation is limited to the assets of the separate account.

254

The following is a summary of the outstanding purchase commitments for these separate account portfolios as of June 30, 2009:


	Contractual Maturity Date
Separate Account Purchase Commitments	Remaining 2009		2010		After 2010		Total
	(in millions)
Recourse to Prudential Insurance	$	1,152	$	2,311	$	1,062	$	4,525
Recourse limited to assets of separate accounts		1,756		1,857		1,933		5,546

Total	$	2,908	$	4,168	$	2,995	$	10,071

The contractual maturity dates of some of the outstanding purchase commitments may accelerate upon a failure to maintain required loan-to-value ratios, upon the downgrade of ratings applicable to the separate account funds or upon the failure to satisfy other financial covenants. Of the $10.1 billion of total commitments, $6.2 billion represents commitments that are not reflected on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2009.

These separate accounts have also entered into syndicated credit facilities providing for borrowings in the aggregate amount of $1.0 billion, of which $0.4 billion was outstanding at June 30, 2009. These facilities also include loan-to-value ratio requirements and other financial covenants. Recourse on obligations under these facilities is limited to the assets of the applicable separate account. As of June 30, 2009, these separate account portfolios had a combined gross and net asset value of $25.0 billion and $12.9 billion, respectively.

At the time of maturity of a commitment obligation, Prudential Insurance often endeavors to negotiate extensions, refinancings or other solutions with creditors. Management believes that the separate accounts have sufficient resources to ultimately meet their obligations. However, because of the volatility and disruption in the credit and capital markets, the separate accounts may not be able to timely fund all maturing obligations from regular sources such as asset sales, operating cash flow, deposits from clients, debt refinancings or from the above-mentioned portfolio level credit facilities. In cases where the separate account is not able to fund maturing obligations, Prudential Insurance may be called upon or required to provide interim funding solutions.

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our asset management subsidiaries had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $1.137 billion and $1.192 billion, respectively, which include $376 million and $462 million of loans secured by investor equity commitments or fund assets, respectively.

Financing Activities

In March 2009, Prudential Financial filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC, which permits the issuance of public debt, equity and hybrid securities. As a “Well-Known Seasoned Issuer” under SEC rules, Prudential Financial’s shelf registration statement provides for automatic effectiveness upon filing, pay-as-you-go fees and the ability to add securities by filing automatically effective amendments. Also, in accordance with these rules, the shelf registration statement has no stated issuance capacity.

In June 2009, Prudential Financial issued 36,858,975 shares of its Common Stock (which number includes the exercise in full of the underwriters’ option to purchase up to an additional 4,807,692 shares of Common Stock) in a public offering at a price of $39.00 per share for gross proceeds of $1.438 billion. The net proceeds from this offering of $1.391 billion are expected to be used for general corporate purposes and are currently held in cash at Prudential Financial.

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, total short- and long-term debt of the Company on a consolidated basis was $24.6 billion and $30.8 billion, respectively, which as shown below includes $13.7 billion and $16.6 billion, respectively, related to the parent company, Prudential Financial.

255

Prudential Financial Borrowings

Prudential Financial is authorized to borrow funds from various sources to meet its capital and other funding needs, as well as the capital and other funding needs of its subsidiaries. The following table sets forth the outstanding short- and long-term debt of Prudential Financial, other than debt issued to consolidated subsidiaries, as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Borrowings:
General obligation short-term debt:
Commercial paper	$	505	$	1,243
Floating rate convertible senior notes		87		2,131
Foreign currency denominated bridge loan facility		—		816
Current portion of long-term debt		55		264
General obligation long-term debt:
Senior debt		8,228		7,255
Junior subordinated debt (hybrid securities)		1,518		1,518
Retail medium-term notes		3,356		3,413

Total general obligations	$	13,749	$	16,640

The following table presents, as of June 30, 2009, Prudential Financial’s contractual maturities of its general obligation long-term debt:


Calendar Year	Senior Debt		Junior Subordinated Debt		Retail Medium-term Notes
	(in millions)
2010	$	—	$	—	$	12
2011		350		—		134
2012		250		—		147
2013		1,100		—		234
2014		1,500		—		140
2015 and thereafter		5,028		1,518		2,689

Total	$	8,228	$	1,518	$	3,356

In March 2009, Prudential Financial filed an updated prospectus supplement for its Medium-Term Notes, Series D program under the shelf registration statement. The authorized issuance capacity under the Series D program is $10 billion, and as of June 30, 2009, approximately $4.1 billion remained available under the current program. In June 2009, Prudential Financial issued $250 million of 6.20% medium-term notes due January 2015 and $750 million of 7.375% 10-year medium-term notes under this program. A portion of the proceeds was used to replace borrowing needs of our affiliates that were previously financed through commercial paper, and the remainder is held in cash at Prudential Financial for general corporate purposes. The weighted average interest rates on Prudential Financial’s medium-term and senior notes, including the effect of interest rate hedging activity, were 5.54% and 5.45% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, excluding the effect of debt issued to consolidated subsidiaries.

In March 2009, Prudential Financial filed an updated prospectus supplement under the shelf registration statement for its retail medium-term notes, including the InterNotes^® program. The authorized issuance capacity under the current retail medium-term notes program is $5 billion, and as of June 30, 2009, approximately $2.4 billion remained available under this program. This retail medium-term notes program has served as a funding source for a product of our Retirement segment for which we earn investment spread that is economically similar

256

to funding agreement-backed medium-term notes issued to institutional investors, except that the retail notes are senior unsecured obligations of Prudential Financial and are primarily purchased by retail investors. However, beginning in the first quarter of 2009, some of the proceeds from prior sales of retail medium-term notes are being used for general corporate purposes and funding agreements issued to the FHLBNY are being used as a substitute funding source for the asset portfolio within the Retirement segment, as discussed in more detail in “—Prudential Financial—Alternative Sources of Liquidity—Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.” The weighted average interest rates on Prudential Financial’s retail medium-term notes were 5.65% and 5.97% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, excluding the effect of debt issued to consolidated subsidiaries. Our retail medium-term notes program has been negatively impacted by the disruptions in the credit markets. The decline in demand for risk-bearing investments among retail investors, and the related increase in funding costs, has resulted in a halt in new debt issuances under this program. As the market dislocations abate and investor demand improves, we may resume issuances under the program.

In February 2009, Prudential Financial repaid at maturity ¥74 billion borrowed under unsecured bridge loan facilities provided by two institutions using internal sources of cash. The net proceeds had been used to repay maturing debt that was issued concurrently with our acquisition of Gibraltar Life in April 2001, which served to fund capital requirements of Gibraltar Life. This requirement is now funded through a combination of borrowings from the FHLBNY, long-term debt of Prudential Funding, and internal sources of cash.

In June 2008, Prudential Financial issued $600 million of 8.875% fixed-to-floating rate junior subordinated notes to institutional investors. Also in June 2008, Prudential Financial issued $800 million of junior subordinated notes to retail investors with a fixed interest rate of 9.0% paid quarterly and issued an additional $120 million of the retail junior subordinated notes in July 2008, following the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option. Both issuances are considered hybrid capital securities, which receive enhanced equity treatment from the rating agencies. Both series of notes have a scheduled maturity of June 15, 2038 and a final maturity of June 15, 2068. See Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information concerning these junior subordinated notes.

In December 2007, Prudential Financial issued in a private placement $3 billion of floating rate convertible senior notes. These notes are convertible by the holders at any time after issuance into cash and shares of Prudential Financial’s Common Stock. The conversion price, $132.39 per share, is subject to adjustment upon certain corporate events. The conversion feature requires net settlement in shares; therefore, upon conversion, a holder would receive cash up to the par amount of the convertible notes surrendered for conversion and shares of Prudential Financial Common Stock only for the portion of the settlement amount in excess of the par amount, if any. The interest rate on these notes is a floating rate equal to 3-month LIBOR minus 1.63%, with a minimum interest rate of 0%, to be reset quarterly. These notes are redeemable by Prudential Financial, at par plus accrued interest, on or after June 16, 2009. Holders of the notes may also require Prudential Financial to repurchase the notes, at par plus accrued interest, on contractually specified dates, of which the first such date was June 15, 2009. On June 15, 2009, $1.819 billion of these notes were repurchased by Prudential Financial as required by the holders. The next date on which holders of these notes may require Prudential Financial to repurchase these notes is December 15, 2009. We have and may again in the future, depending on economic considerations, also choose to repurchase portions of the outstanding notes from certain qualified institutional buyers. During the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, we repurchased, in individually negotiated transactions, $853 million and $245 million, respectively, of these notes which were offered to the Company by certain holders. As of June 30, 2009, $83 million of these floating rate convertible senior notes remain outstanding. In addition, as of June 30, 2009, $4 million of floating rate convertible senior notes that were issued by Prudential Financial in a private placement in December 2006 remain outstanding. The next date on which holders of these notes may require Prudential Financial to repurchase these notes is December 12, 2009. See Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information concerning convertible senior notes.

257

Prudential Financial also maintains a Euro medium term notes program under which it is authorized to issue up to $1.5 billion of notes. As of June 30, 2009, there was no debt outstanding under this program.

Consolidated Borrowings

Current capital markets activities for the Company on a consolidated basis principally consist of unsecured short-term and long-term debt borrowings issued by Prudential Funding and Prudential Financial, unsecured third party bank borrowings, and asset-based or secured financing. As of June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all debt covenants related to the borrowings in the table below.

The following table sets forth total consolidated borrowings of the Company as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
Borrowings:
General obligation short-term debt(1)	$	3,608	$	10,197

General obligation long-term debt:
Senior debt		11,905		11,054
Junior subordinated debt (hybrid securities)		1,518		1,518
Surplus notes(3)		3,641		3,644
Other(2)		1,000		2,000

Total general obligation long-term debt		18,064		18,216

Total general obligations		21,672		28,413

Limited and non-recourse borrowing:
Limited and non-recourse short-term debt		35		338
Limited and non-recourse long-term debt(4)		2,917		2,074

Total limited and non-recourse borrowing		2,952		2,412

Total borrowings(5)		24,624		30,825

Total asset-based financing		11,059		12,551

Total borrowings and asset-based financings	$	35,683	$	43,376

(1)	As of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 $1.0 billion of short-term debt represent collateralized advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, which are discussed in more detail in “—Prudential Financial—Alternative Sources of Liquidity—Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.

(2)	Reflects collateralized advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, which are discussed in more detail in “—Prudential Financial—Alternative Sources of Liquidity—Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.

(3)	As of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, includes $3.2 billion, of floating rate surplus notes issued by subsidiaries of Prudential Insurance to fund regulatory reserves, as well as $441 million and $444 million, respectively, of fixed rate surplus notes issued by Prudential Insurance.

(4)

As of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $1.750 billion of limited and non-recourse long-term debt outstanding was attributable to the Closed Block Business. In addition, long-term debt as of June 30, 2009 reflects $1.167 million of secured financing related to TALF, which is discussed in more detail below.

(5)

Does not include $6.7 billion and $7.1 billion of medium-term notes of consolidated trust entities secured by funding agreements purchased with the proceeds of such notes as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, or $1.5 billion of collateralized funding agreements issued to the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York as of June 30, 2009. These notes and funding agreements are included in “Policyholders’ account balances.” For additional information on the trust notes, see “—Funding Agreement Notes Issuance Program” and for additional information on the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York funding agreements, see”—Alternative Sources of Liquidity—Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.”

Total general debt obligations decreased by $6.7 billion from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009, primarily due to a reduction in short-term debt. The primary drivers of the reduction in short-term debt were the reduction in outstanding Prudential Financial and Prudential Funding commercial paper, as further described in

258

“—Alternative Sources of Liquidity,” the repayment of ¥74 billion borrowed under unsecured bridge loan facilities described earlier, the repurchases of a portion of our convertible senior notes and maturities of our medium-term notes.

During the first six months of 2009, we purchased securities under the Federal Reserve’s Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF. TALF provides secured financing for asset-backed securities backed by certain types of consumer and small business loans and (as of July 2009) for certain high-quality commercial mortgage-backed securities issued before January1, 2009. TALF financing is non-recourse to the borrower, is collateralized by the purchased securities and provides financing for the purchase price of the securities, less a ‘haircut’ that varies based on the type of collateral. Borrowers under the program can deliver the collateralized securities to a special purpose vehicle created by Federal Reserve in full defeasance of the loan.

As of June 30, 2009, we had $1.250 billion of securities purchased under TALF that are reflected within “Other trading account assets,” and had $1.167 billion of secured financing from the Federal Reserve related to the purchase of these securities that is reflected within “Long-term debt.” We are carrying the securities at fair value as SFAS No. 115 trading assets and the loan at fair value under the fair value option afforded by SFAS No. 159.

The NAIC has adopted a Model Regulation entitled “Valuation of Life Insurance Policies,” commonly known as “Regulation XXX,” and a supporting Guideline entitled “The Application of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies,” commonly known as “Guideline AXXX.” The Regulation and supporting Guideline require insurers to establish statutory reserves for term and universal life insurance policies with long-term premium guarantees that are consistent with the statutory reserves required for other individual life insurance policies with similar guarantees. Many market participants believe that this level of reserves is excessive, and we have implemented reinsurance and capital management actions to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX on our term and universal life insurance businesses, including those actions which are described in more detail below.

During 2006, a subsidiary of Prudential Insurance entered into a surplus note purchase agreement with an unaffiliated financial institution that provides for the issuance of up to $3 billion of ten-year floating rate surplus notes through 2016, if certain conditions are met (commonly referred to as XXX notes), for the purpose of financing certain regulatory reserves required to be held by subsidiary life insurers in connection with the intercompany reinsurance of certain term life insurance policies. In connection with this financing arrangement, Prudential Financial has agreed with such subsidiary that it or certain of its affiliates will make capital contributions to such subsidiary as necessary to maintain the capital of such subsidiary at or above a prescribed minimum level. Concurrent with the issuance of each surplus note, Prudential Financial enters into arrangements with the buyer, which are accounted for as derivative instruments, that may result in payments by, or to, Prudential Financial over the term of the surplus notes, to the extent there are significant changes in the value of the surplus notes. Principal factors that impact the value of the surplus notes are mortality experience and interest rates. As of June 30, 2009, there have been no payments made under the derivative instrument. Surplus notes issued under this facility are subordinated to policyholder obligations and are subject to regulatory approvals for principal and interest payments. Total outstanding notes under this facility was $2.7 billion both as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. See Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.

During 2007, a subsidiary of Prudential Insurance issued $500 million of 45-year floating rate surplus notes (commonly referred to as AXXX notes) to an unaffiliated financial institution for the purpose of financing certain regulatory reserves required to be held by subsidiary life insurers in connection with the intercompany reinsurance of certain universal life insurance policies. Surplus notes issued under this facility are subordinated to policyholder obligations and are subject to regulatory approvals for principal and interest payments. See Note 12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. In connection with this financing arrangement, Prudential Financial has agreed with such subsidiary

259

that it or certain of its affiliates will make capital contributions to such subsidiary as necessary to maintain the capital of such subsidiary at or above a prescribed minimum level. Concurrent with the issuance of these surplus notes, Prudential Financial entered into a credit derivative that requires Prudential Financial to make certain payments in the event of deterioration in the value of the surplus note. Under this credit derivative, we are required to post cash collateral based on tests that consider the level of 10-year credit default swap spreads on Prudential Financial’s senior debt. As of June 30, 2009, when estimates of Prudential Financial’s 10-year credit default swap spreads were approximately 490 basis points, we had posted $53 million of collateral under this agreement.

As we continue to underwrite term and universal life business, we expect to have borrowing needs in 2009 to finance statutory reserves required under Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX. Several strategies are currently under review to reduce the strain of increased AXXX and XXX statutory reserves associated with our term and universal life products. The activities we may undertake to mitigate or address these needs include obtaining letters of credit, entering into reinsurance transactions or executing other capital market strategies; however, our ability to successfully execute these strategies may depend on market conditions. Further, we have $300 million currently available under our XXX notes facility described above. Absent any successful mitigation efforts and assuming full usage of the XXX notes facility, we currently believe that our financing need for 2009 could be up to $200 million for XXX and AXXX combined, but this amount may fluctuate due to changes in market conditions or product sales. If we are unsuccessful in satisfying or mitigating this strain as a result of market conditions or otherwise, this financing need could have an adverse effect on our overall liquidity and capital and could require us to increase prices and/or reduce our sales of term or universal life products.

Our total borrowings consist of capital debt, investment related debt, securities business related debt and debt related to specified other businesses. Capital debt is borrowing that is used or will be used to meet the capital requirements of Prudential Financial as well as borrowings invested in equity or debt securities of direct or indirect subsidiaries of Prudential Financial and subsidiary borrowings utilized for capital requirements. Investment related borrowings consist of debt issued to finance specific investment assets or portfolios of investment assets, including institutional spread lending investment portfolios, real estate and real estate related investments held in consolidated joint ventures, as well as institutional and insurance company portfolio cash flow timing differences. Securities business related debt consists of debt issued to finance primarily the liquidity of our broker-dealers and our capital markets and other securities business related operations. Debt related to specified other businesses consists of borrowings associated with our individual annuity business, real estate franchises and relocation services. Borrowings under which either the holder is entitled to collect only against the assets pledged to the debt as collateral, or has only very limited rights to collect against other assets, have been classified as limited and non-recourse debt. Consolidated borrowings as of both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 included $1.750 billion of limited and non-recourse debt attributable to the Closed Block Business.

260

The following table summarizes our borrowings, categorized by use of proceeds, as of the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
	(in millions)
General obligations:
Capital debt	$	8,004	$	7,535
Investment related		10,378		16,480
Securities business related		2,643		3,356
Specified other businesses		647		1,042

Total general obligations		21,672		28,413
Limited and non-recourse debt		2,952		2,412

Total borrowings	$	24,624	$	30,825

Short-term debt	$	3,643	$	10,535
Long-term debt		20,981		20,290

Total borrowings	$	24,624	$	30,825

Borrowings of Financial Services Businesses	$	22,874	$	28,632
Borrowings of Closed Block Business		1,750		2,193

Total borrowings	$	24,624	$	30,825

Funding Agreement Notes Issuance Program

In 2003, Prudential Insurance established a Funding Agreement Notes Issuance Program pursuant to which a Delaware statutory trust issues medium-term notes (which are included in our statements of financial position in “Policyholders’ account balances” and not included in the foregoing table) secured by funding agreements issued to the trust by Prudential Insurance and included in our Retirement segment. The funding agreements provide cash flow sufficient for the debt service on the related medium-term notes. The medium-term notes are sold in transactions not requiring registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The notes have fixed or floating interest rates and original maturities ranging from two to seven years. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the outstanding aggregate principal amount of such notes totaled $6.7 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively, out of a total authorized amount of up to $15 billion. The decrease in outstanding aggregate principal amount of such notes is due to maturities in excess of issuances during the first half of 2009. Given the current market environment, our ability to issue new notes during the first half of 2009 has been negatively impacted. The aggregate maturities of these notes over the next 12 months are approximately $3.3 billion. We intend to repay the maturing notes through a combination of cash flows from asset maturities, asset sales, new liability origination and internal sources of funds.

Lines of Credit and Other Credit Facilities

As of June 30, 2009, Prudential Financial, Prudential Insurance and Prudential Funding had unsecured committed lines of credit totaling $4.34 billion. These facilities are available to each of the borrowers, up to the aggregate committed credit, to be used for general corporate purposes. This amount includes a $1.94 billion 5-year credit facility that expires in May 2012, which includes 20 financial institutions, and a $2.4 billion credit facility, of which $200 million expires in December 2011 and $2.2 billion expires in December 2012, which includes 18 financial institutions. The available credit and number of lenders reflects the removal in January 2009 of Lehman Commercial Paper Inc. and Lehman Brothers Bank FSB as participants in these facilities. Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., which filed for bankruptcy in October 2008, had been a participant in the amount of $60 million and Lehman Brothers Bank FSB had been a participant in the amount of $100 million. We maintain these facilities primarily as back up liquidity lines for our commercial paper programs, and there were no outstanding borrowings under either facility as of June 30, 2009. Any borrowings made under these

261

outstanding facilities would mature no later than the respective expiration dates of the facilities and would bear interest at the rates set forth in each facility agreement. Within each facility, no single financial institution has more than 15% of the total committed credit.

Our ability to borrow under these facilities is conditioned on the continued satisfaction of customary conditions, including the maintenance at all times by Prudential Insurance of total adjusted capital of at least $5.5 billion based on statutory accounting principles prescribed under New Jersey law and Prudential Financial’s maintenance of consolidated net worth of at least $12.5 billion, which for this purpose is based on U.S. GAAP stockholders’ equity, excluding net unrealized gains and losses on investments. Our ability to borrow under these facilities is not contingent on our credit ratings or subject to material adverse change clauses. As of June 30, 2009, Prudential Insurance’s total adjusted capital and Prudential Financial’s consolidated U.S. GAAP stockholders’ equity, excluding net unrealized gains and losses on investments, exceeded the minimum amounts required to borrow under these facilities. We also use uncommitted lines of credit from financial institutions.

Ratings

Claims-paying and credit ratings are important factors affecting public confidence in an insurer and its competitive position in marketing products. National Recognized Statistical Ratings Organizations continually review the financial performance and condition of insurers, including Prudential Insurance and our other insurance company subsidiaries. Our credit ratings are also important for our ability to raise capital through the issuance of debt and for the cost of such financing.


	A.M. Best(1)	S&P(2)	Moody’s(3)		Fitch(4)
*Insurance Claims-Paying Ratings:*
The Prudential Insurance Company of America	A+	AA-	A2		A+
PRUCO Life Insurance Company	A+	AA-	A2		A+
PRUCO Life Insurance Company of New Jersey	A+	AA-	NR	*	A+
Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation	A+	AA-	NR		A+
Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company	A+	AA-	A2		A+
The Prudential Life Insurance Company Ltd. (Prudential of Japan)	NR	AA-	NR		NR
Gibraltar Life Insurance Company, Ltd.	NR	AA-	A2		NR

*Credit Ratings:*
Prudential Financial, Inc.:
Short-term borrowings	AMB-1	A-1	P-2		F2
Long-term senior debt(5)	a-	A	Baa2		BBB
Junior subordinated long-term debt	bbb	BBB+	Baa3		BBB-
The Prudential Insurance Company of America:
Capital and surplus notes	a	A	Baa1		A-
Prudential Funding, LLC:
Short-term debt	AMB-1	A-1+	P-1		F1
Long-term senior debt	a+	AA-	A3		A
PRICOA Global Funding I:
Long-term senior debt	aa-	AA-	A2		A+

262

*	“NR” indicates not rated.

(1)

A.M. Best Company, which we refer to as A.M. Best, claims-paying ratings for insurance companies currently range from “A++ (superior)” to “F (in liquidation).” A.M. Best’s ratings reflect its opinion of an insurance company’s financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet its obligations to policyholders. An A.M. Best long-term credit rating is an opinion of the ability of an obligor to pay interest and principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. A.M. Best long-term credit ratings range from “aaa (exceptional)” to “d (in default),” with ratings from “aaa” to “bbb” considered as investment grade. An A.M. Best short-term credit rating reflects an opinion of the issuer’s fundamental credit quality. Ratings range from “AMB-1+,” which represents an exceptional ability to repay short-term debt obligations, to “AMB-4,” which correlates with a speculative (“bb”) long-term rating.

(2)

Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, which we refer to as S&P, claims-paying ratings currently range from “AAA (extremely strong)” to “R (regulatory supervision).” These ratings reflect S&P’s opinion of an operating insurance company’s financial capacity to meet the obligations of its insurance policies in accordance with their terms. A “+” or “-” indicates relative strength within a category. An S&P credit rating is a current opinion of the creditworthiness of an obligor with respect to a specific financial obligation, a specific class of financial obligations or a specific financial program. S&P’s long-term issue credit ratings range from “AAA (extremely strong)” to “D (default).” S&P short-term ratings range from “A-1 (highest category)” to “D (default).”

(3)

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., which we refer to as Moody’s, insurance claims-paying ratings currently range from “Aaa (exceptional)” to “C (lowest).” Moody’s insurance ratings reflect the ability of insurance companies to repay punctually senior policyholder claims and obligations. Numeric modifiers are used to refer to the ranking within the group—with 1 being the highest and 3 being the lowest. These modifiers are used to indicate relative strength within a category. Moody’s credit ratings currently range from “Aaa (highest)” to “C (default).” Moody’s credit ratings grade debt according to its investment quality. Moody’s considers “A1,” “A2” and “A3” rated debt to be upper medium grade obligations, subject to low credit risk. Moody’s short-term ratings are opinions of the ability of issuers to honor senior financial obligations and contracts. Prime ratings range from “Prime-1 (P-1),” which represents a superior ability for repayment of senior short-term debt obligations, to “Prime-3 (P-3),” which represents an acceptable ability for repayment of such obligations. Issuers rated “Not Prime” do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.

(4)

Fitch Ratings Ltd., which we refer to as Fitch, claims-paying ratings currently range from “AAA (exceptionally strong)” to “D (distressed).” Fitch’s ratings reflect its assessment of the likelihood of timely payment of policyholder and contractholder obligations. Fitch long-term credit ratings currently range from “AAA (highest credit quality),” which denotes exceptionally strong capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, to “D (default).” Investment grade ratings range between “AAA” and “BBB.” Short-term ratings range from “F1 (highest credit quality)” to “C (high default risk).” Within long-term and short-term ratings, a “+” or a “–” may be appended to a rating to denote relative status within major rating categories.

(5)	Includes the retail medium-term notes program.

The ratings set forth above with respect to Prudential Financial, Prudential Funding, LLC, Prudential Insurance and our other insurance and financing subsidiaries reflect current opinions of each rating organization with respect to claims-paying ability, financial strength, operating performance and ability to meet obligations to policyholders or debt holders, as the case may be. These ratings are of concern to policyholders, agents and intermediaries. They are not directed toward shareholders and do not in any way reflect evaluations of the safety and security of the Common Stock. These ratings are reviewed periodically and we cannot assure you that we will maintain our current ratings in the future. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

Our claims-paying ratings are an important factor affecting public confidence in most of our products and, as a result, our competitiveness. The interest rates we pay on our borrowings are largely dependent on our credit ratings. A downgrade in the credit or financial strength (i.e., claims-paying) ratings of Prudential Financial or its rated subsidiaries could potentially, among other things, limit our ability to market products, reduce our competitiveness, increase the number or value of policy surrenders and withdrawals, increase our borrowing costs and potentially make it more difficult to borrow funds, adversely affect the availability of financial guarantees, such as letters of credit, cause additional collateral requirements or other required payments under certain agreements, allow counterparties to terminate derivative agreements and/or hurt our relationships with creditors or trading counterparties thereby potentially negatively effecting our profitability, liquidity and/or capital.

In addition, as required by SFAS No. 157, we consider our own risk of non-performance in determining the fair value of our liabilities. Therefore, changes in our credit ratings and our claims-paying ratings, which represent the market’s perception of our non-performance risk, will affect the fair value of our liabilities.

Additional collateral requirements or other required payments under certain agreements, including derivative agreements, are eligible to be satisfied in cash or by posting securities held by the subsidiaries subject

263

to the agreements. A ratings downgrade of three ratings levels from the ratings levels as of June 30, 2009 would result in estimated additional collateral posting requirements or payments under such agreements of approximately $200 million as of June 30, 2009. The amount of collateral required to be posted for derivative agreements is also dependent on the fair value of the derivative positions as of the balance sheet date. For additional information regarding the potential impacts of a ratings downgrade on our derivative agreements see Note 14 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, a ratings downgrade by A.M. Best to “A-” for our domestic life insurance companies would require Prudential Insurance to post a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $1.4 billion, based on the level of statutory reserves related to an acquired business, that we estimate would result in annual cash outflows of approximately $70 million, or collateral posting in the form of cash or securities to be held in a trust. We believe that the posting of such collateral would not be a material liquidity event for Prudential Insurance.

Rating agencies use an “outlook” statement for both industry sectors and individual companies. For an industry sector, a negative outlook generally implies that over the next 12-18 months, the rating agency expects more downgrades than upgrades among companies in the sector. However, such an outlook does not imply that all, or even a majority of, companies will necessarily experience ratings downgrades. For a particular company, an outlook generally indicates a medium- or long-term trend (generally six months to two years) in credit fundamentals, which if continued, may lead to a rating change. These indicators are not necessarily a precursor of a rating change nor do they preclude a rating agency from changing a rating at any time without notice.

In view of the difficulties experienced recently by many financial institutions, the rating agencies have heightened the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, have increased the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, have requested additional information from the companies that they rate, and may adjust upward the capital and other requirements employed in the rating agency models for maintenance of certain ratings levels, such as the financial strength ratings currently held by our life insurance subsidiaries. In addition, actions we might take to access third party financing or to realign our capital structure may in turn cause rating agencies to reevaluate our ratings.

Provided below is a discussion of the significant changes in our ratings or rating outlooks that occurred from the beginning of 2009 through the date of this filing.

On February 10, 2009, Moody’s placed the long-term ratings of Prudential Financial and our life insurance subsidiaries on review for possible downgrade. The short-term ratings of Prudential Financial and Prudential Funding were affirmed with a stable outlook.

On March 18, 2009, Moody’s lowered the long-term senior debt rating of Prudential Financial to “Baa2” from “A3” and lowered the financial strength ratings of our life insurance subsidiaries to “A2” from “Aa3,” with a negative outlook. Moody’s also placed the short-term debt rating of Prudential Funding on review for possible downgrade.

On June 26, 2009, Moody’s affirmed the long-term senior debt rating of Prudential Financial at “Baa2” and the financial strength ratings of our life insurance subsidiaries at “A2,” and revised the outlook from negative to stable. The short-term debt rating of Prudential Funding remains on review for possible downgrade.

On February 19, 2009, Fitch lowered Prudential Financial’s long-term senior debt rating to “BBB” from “A-” and the short-term rating to “F2” from “F1.” Fitch also downgraded the financial strength ratings of the life insurance subsidiaries to “A+” from “AA-” and the short-term rating of Prudential Funding to “F1” from “F1+.” The outlook for all ratings remains negative.

On February 17, 2009, S&P lowered Prudential Financial’s long-term senior debt rating to “A” from “A+” and affirmed the “AA” ratings of our life insurance subsidiaries. The long-term ratings outlook was revised from stable to negative.

264

On February 26, 2009, S&P lowered the financial strength ratings of our life insurance subsidiaries to “AA-” from “AA” and affirmed Prudential Financial’s long-term senior debt ratings as “A.” The outlook for both ratings was revised from negative to stable.

On June 3, 2009, S&P affirmed Prudential Financial’s long-term senior debt rating at “A” and short-term rating at “A-1.” S&P also affirmed the financial strength ratings of our life insurance subsidiaries at “AA-” and the short-term debt rating of Prudential Funding at “A1+.” The outlook for all of these companies remains stable.

On May 27, 2009, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength ratings of our life subsidiaries at “A+,” and affirmed Prudential Financial’s long-term senior debt rating at “a-.” The outlook for both was revised from stable to negative.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Guarantees and Other Contingencies

In the course of our business, we provide certain guarantees and indemnities to third parties pursuant to which we may be contingently required to make payments now or in the future.

A number of guarantees provided by us relate to real estate investments held in our separate accounts, in which the separate account has borrowed funds, and we have guaranteed their obligation to their lender. We provide these guarantees to assist the separate account in obtaining financing for the transaction. Our maximum potential exposure under these guarantees was $1.554 billion as of June 30, 2009, of which all but $278 million is limited to the assets of the separate account for which exposure primarily relates to guarantees limited to fraud, criminal activity or other bad acts. These guarantees generally expire at various times over the next sixteen years. At June 30, 2009, no amounts were accrued as a result our assessment that it is unlikely payments will be required. Any payments that may become required of us under these guarantees would either first be reduced by proceeds received by the creditor on a sale of the underlying collateral, or would provide us with rights to obtain the underlying collateral.

We have also provided a guarantee to a syndication of lenders in connection with a retail development project in Singapore that is 50% co-owned by us and an unconsolidated real estate fund we manage. The principal provisions in the guarantee require that the loan-to-value ratio of the retail development project be maintained at 60% or lower, based on an external appraisal. A loan-to-value ratio in excess of 60% would require us and our co-owner to jointly and severally paydown the loan balance to the 60% level. The current loan-to-value ratio, based on a December 2008 appraisal, is 59.6%. Other obligations under the guarantee include guaranteeing the interest-servicing on the loan on a proportionate basis and undertaking to complete the project and fund all development costs, including cost overruns. Our exposure under the guarantee was $171 million as of June 30, 2009, which assumes the co-owner honors its joint guarantee.

We write credit derivatives under which we are obligated to pay the counterparty the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the defaulted security or similar security. Our maximum amount at risk under these credit derivatives, assuming the value of the underlying referenced securities become worthless, is $1.168 billion as of June 30, 2009. These credit derivatives generally have maturities of five years or less. See Note 14 to our Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning credit derivatives.

Certain contracts underwritten by the Retirement segment include guarantees related to financial assets owned by the guaranteed party. These contracts are accounted for as derivatives, at fair value, in accordance with SFAS No. 133. As of June 30, 2009, such contracts in force carried a total guaranteed value of $6.576 billion. These guarantees are supported by collateral that is not reflected on our balance sheet. This collateral had a fair value of $6.587 billion as of June 30, 2009.

265

We arrange for credit enhancements of certain debt instruments that provide financing for commercial real estate assets, including certain tax-exempt bond financings. The credit enhancements provide assurances to the debt holders as to the timely payment of amounts due under the debt instruments. As of June 30, 2009, such enhancement arrangements total $220 million, with remaining contractual maturities of up to fifteen years. Our obligation to reimburse required credit enhancement payments is secured by mortgages on the related real estate, which properties are valued at $275 million as of June 30, 2009. We receive certain ongoing fees for providing these enhancement arrangements and anticipate the extinguishment of our obligation under these enhancements prior to maturity through the aggregation and transfer of our positions to a substitute enhancement provider. As of June 30, 2009, we have accrued liabilities of $1 million representing unearned fees on these arrangements.

As part of the commercial mortgage activities of our Asset Management segment, we provide commercial mortgage origination, underwriting and servicing for certain government sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We have agreed to indemnify the government sponsored entities for a portion of the credit risk associated with certain of the mortgages we service through a delegated authority arrangement. Under these arrangements, we originate multi-family mortgages for sale to the government sponsored entities based on underwriting standards they specify, and are obligated to make payments to them for a specified percentage share of losses they incur on certain loans we service. Our percentage share of losses incurred generally varies from 2% to 20% of the loan balance, and is typically based on a first-loss exposure for a stated percentage of the loan balance, plus a shared exposure with the government sponsored entity for any losses in excess of the stated first-loss percentage, subject to a contractually specified maximum percentage. We service $7.490 billion of mortgages subject to these loss-sharing arrangements as of June 30, 2009, all of which are collateralized by first priority liens on the underlying multi-family residential properties. As of June 30, 2009, these mortgages had an average debt service coverage ratio of 1.60 times and an average loan-to-value ratio of 69%. The maximum exposure to loss as of June 30, 2009, assuming no recovery on any of the underlying collateral, is $997 million, with first-loss exposure of $317 million. Over the three years ended December 31, 2008, our total share of losses related to indemnifications that were settled was $8 million, with no additional settlements in the first six months of 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we have established a liability of $19 million related to these indemnifications.

In connection with certain acquisitions, we agreed to pay additional consideration in future periods, contingent upon the attainment by the acquired entity of defined operating objectives. As of June 30, 2009, maximum potential future consideration pursuant to such arrangements, to be resolved over the following four years, is $130 million. Any such payments would result in increases in intangible assets, such as goodwill.

We are also subject to other financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements. We have provided indemnities and guarantees related to acquisitions, dispositions, investments and other transactions that are triggered by, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by us. These obligations are typically subject to various time limitations, defined by the contract or by operation of law, such as statutes of limitation. In some cases, the maximum potential obligation is subject to contractual limitations, while in other cases such limitations are not specified or applicable. Since certain of these obligations are not subject to limitations, it is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount due under these guarantees. As of June 30, 2009, we have accrued liabilities of $5 million associated with all other financial guarantees and indemnity arrangements, which does not include retained liabilities associated with sold businesses.

Other Contingent Commitments

In connection with our commercial mortgage operations, we originate commercial mortgage loans. As of June 30, 2009, we had outstanding commercial mortgage loan commitments with borrowers of $2.022 billion. In certain of these transactions, we prearrange that we will sell the loan to an investor, including to governmental sponsored entities as discussed above, after we fund the loan. As of June 30, 2009, $1.045 billion of our commitments to originate commercial mortgage loans are subject to such arrangements.

266

We also have other commitments, some of which are contingent upon events or circumstances not under our control, including those at the discretion of our counterparties. These other commitments amounted to $9.879 billion as of June 30, 2009. Reflected in these other commitments are $9.838 billion of commitments to purchase or fund investments, including $6.234 billion that we anticipate will ultimately be funded from our separate accounts. Of these separate account commitments, $2.668 billion have recourse to Prudential Insurance if the separate accounts are unable to fund the amounts when due. For further discussion of these separate account commitments, see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources of Subsidiaries—Asset Management Subsidiaries.”

Other Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have retained or contingent interests in assets transferred to unconsolidated entities, or variable interests in unconsolidated entities or other similar transactions, arrangements or relationships that serve as credit, liquidity or market risk support, that we believe are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or our access to or requirements for capital resources. In addition, we do not have relationships with any unconsolidated entities that are contractually limited to narrow activities that facilitate our transfer of or access to associated assets.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of change in the value of financial instruments as a result of absolute or relative changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates or equity or commodity prices. To varying degrees, the investment and trading activities supporting all of our products and services generate market risks. There have been no material changes in our market risk exposures from December 31, 2008, a description of which may be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of how the current difficult conditions in the financial markets and the economy generally may materially adversely affect our business and results of our operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

In order to ensure that the information we must disclose in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of June 30, 2009. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. No change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

267

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of our businesses, including class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings specific to us and proceedings generally applicable to business practices in the industries in which we operate including, in both cases, businesses that have either been divested or placed in wind-down status. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities, such as our investments, contracts, leases and labor and employment relationships, including claims of discrimination and harassment. In some of our pending legal and regulatory actions, parties are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages.

In July 2009, an amended consolidated complaint was filed in Bauer v. Prudential Financial, et al., that added claims regarding contingent liability relating to the auction rate securities markets and reserves relating to annuity contract holders. The complaint restates the claims regarding impairments related to mortgage backed securities. The complaint names all of the same defendants as the prior complaints, with the exception of the Company’s independent auditors. Pinchuk v. Prudential Financial, Inc. et al. was voluntarily dismissed.

In May 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a final order approving the settlement of the multi-district litigation that included the Janowsky, Goldstein, Dewane, DiLustro, Panesenko and Badain matters, and involved wage and hour claims by former PSI and PEG stockbrokers.

In May 2009, the Board formed a Special Evaluation Committee, comprised of independent directors, and authorized the Committee to hire outside advisors and experts to assist in its evaluation of the demand by a Prudential Financial stockholder, the Service Employees International Union Pension Plans Master Trust, that the Board take action to recover allegedly improperly paid compensation to certain current and former employees and executive officers.

Our litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, the outcomes cannot be predicted. It is possible that our results of operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation and regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. In light of the unpredictability of the Company’s litigation and regulatory matters, it is also possible that in certain cases an ultimate unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or regulatory matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial position. Management believes, however, that, based on information currently known to it, the ultimate outcome of all pending litigation and regulatory matters, after consideration of applicable reserves and rights to indemnification, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

268

The foregoing discussion is limited to recent material developments concerning our legal and regulatory proceedings. See Note 15 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional discussion of our litigation and regulatory matters, including those referred to above.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the following risks. These risks could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial condition, cause the trading price of our Common Stock to decline materially or cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These risks are not exclusive, and additional risks to which we are subject include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” above and the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Some of our businesses and our results of operations have been materially adversely affected by the adverse conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions generally. Our businesses, results of operations and financial condition may be further adversely affected, possibly materially, if these conditions persist or deteriorate.

Our results of operations have been materially adversely affected by conditions in the global financial markets and the economy generally, both in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world. The global financial markets have experienced extreme stress since the second half of 2007. Volatility and disruption in the global financial markets reached unprecedented levels for the post World War II period. The availability and cost of credit has been materially affected. These factors, combined with recent economic conditions in the U.S. including depressed home and commercial real estate prices and increasing foreclosures, falling equity market values, declining business and consumer confidence and rising unemployment, have precipitated a severe economic recession and fears of even more severe and prolonged adverse economic conditions.

Due to the economic environment, the global fixed-income markets have experienced both extreme volatility and limited market liquidity conditions, which has affected a broad range of asset classes and sectors. As a result, the market for fixed income instruments has experienced decreased liquidity, increased price volatility, credit downgrade events, and increased probability of default. Global equity markets have also experienced heightened volatility. These events have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on us. Our revenues are likely to decline in such circumstances, the cost of meeting our obligations to our customers may increase, and our profit margins would likely erode. In addition, in the event of a prolonged or severe economic downturn, we could incur significant losses in our investment portfolio.

The demand for our products could be adversely affected in an economic downturn characterized by higher unemployment, lower family income, lower consumer spending, lower corporate earnings and lower business investment. We also may experience a higher incidence of claims and lapses or surrenders of policies. Our policyholders may choose to defer or stop paying insurance premiums. We cannot predict definitively whether or when such actions, which could impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, may occur.

Markets in the United States and elsewhere have experienced extreme and unprecedented volatility and disruption, with adverse consequences to our liquidity, access to capital and cost of capital. Market conditions such as we have experienced since the second half of 2007 may significantly affect our ability to meet liquidity needs, our access to capital and our cost of capital, including capital that may be required by our subsidiaries. We may seek additional debt or equity capital but be unable to obtain such.

Adverse capital market conditions have affected and may continue to affect the availability and cost of borrowed funds and could impact our ability to refinance existing borrowings, thereby ultimately impacting our

269

profitability and ability to support or grow our businesses. We need liquidity to pay our operating expenses, interest on our debt and dividends on our capital stock and replace certain maturing debt obligations. Without sufficient liquidity, we could be forced to curtail certain of our operations, and our business could suffer. The principal sources of our liquidity are insurance premiums, annuity considerations, deposit funds and cash flow from our investment portfolio and assets, consisting mainly of cash or assets that are readily convertible into cash. Sources of liquidity in normal markets also include a variety of short- and long-term instruments, including securities lending and repurchase agreements, commercial paper, medium and long-term debt and capital securities.

Disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in the financial markets have limited and may be expected to continue to limit our access to capital required to operate our business, most significantly our insurance operations. These market conditions may limit our ability to replace, in a timely manner, maturing debt obligations and access the capital necessary to grow our business, replace capital withdrawn by customers or raise new capital required by our subsidiaries as a result of volatility in the markets. As a result, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue shorter tenor securities than would be optimal, bear an unattractive cost of capital or be unable to raise capital at any price, which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility. Actions we might take to access financing may in turn cause rating agencies to reevaluate our ratings. Our ability to borrow under our commercial paper programs is also dependent upon market conditions. Future deterioration of our capital position at a time when we are unable to access the long-term debt or commercial paper markets could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity. Our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient.

We may seek additional debt or equity financing to satisfy our needs. The availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the overall availability of credit to the financial services industry, and our credit ratings and credit capacity. We may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. Equity offerings would dilute the ownership interest of existing shareholders.

The Risk Based Capital, or RBC, ratio is the primary measure by which we evaluate the capital adequacy of Prudential Insurance, which includes businesses in both the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. We have managed Prudential Insurance’s RBC ratio to a level consistent with a “AA” ratings objective; however, rating agencies take into account a variety of factors in assigning ratings to our insurance subsidiaries in addition to RBC levels. RBC is determined by statutory rules that consider risks related to the type and quality of the invested assets, insurance-related risks associated with Prudential Insurance’s products, interest rate risks and general business risks. The RBC ratio calculations are intended to assist insurance regulators in measuring the adequacy of Prudential Insurance’s statutory capitalization. Subsequent to September 30, 2008, market conditions negatively impacted the level of capital in our domestic life insurance subsidiaries and caused us to take capital management actions to maintain capital consistent with these ratings objectives, which included redeployment of financial resources from internal sources, including the contribution of the subsidiary that holds our minority interest in the Wachovia Securities retail brokerage joint venture to Prudential Insurance. The RBC ratio is an annual calculation; however, based upon June 30, 2009 amounts, the RBC for Prudential Insurance and our other domestic life insurance subsidiaries would exceed the minimum level required by applicable insurance regulations. The level of statutory capital of our domestic life insurance subsidiaries is affected by the statutory account rules for loan-backed and structured securities. Mandatory adoption of changes to these rules was recently deferred until periods ending on or after September 30, 2009. Further changes to these rules by insurance regulators, or the timing of the Company’s application of these rules, are possible, given the deferral and other uncertainty around the resolution of these accounting rules.

Disruptions in the capital markets could adversely affect Prudential Financial and its subsidiaries’ ability to access sources of liquidity, as well as threaten to reduce our capital below a level that is consistent with our existing ratings objectives. Therefore, we may need to take additional actions, which may include but are not limited to: (1) further access external sources of capital, including the debt or equity markets, as noted above;

270

(2) reduce or eliminate future shareholder dividends on our Common Stock; (3) utilize further proceeds from our retail medium term notes for general corporate purposes by accelerating repayments of additional funding agreements from Prudential Insurance; (4) undertake additional capital management activities, including reinsurance transactions; (5) transfer ownership of certain subsidiaries of Prudential Financial to Prudential Insurance; (6) take additional actions related to derivatives; (7) limit or curtail sales of certain products and/or restructure existing products; (8) effectuate the repayment of affiliate surplus notes; (9) undertake further asset sales or internal asset transfers; and (10) seek temporary or permanent changes to regulatory rules. Certain of these actions may require regulatory approval and/or agreement of counterparties which are outside of our control or have economic costs associated with them.

We maintain committed unsecured revolving credit facilities that, as of June 30, 2009, totaled $4.34 billion. We rely on these credit facilities as a potential source of liquidity which could be critical in enabling us to meet our obligations as they come due, particularly during periods when alternative sources of liquidity are limited such as in the current market environment. Our ability to borrow under these facilities is conditioned on our satisfaction of covenants and other requirements contained in the facilities, such as Prudential Insurance’s maintenance of total adjusted capital of at least $5.5 billion based on statutory accounting principles prescribed under New Jersey law and Prudential Financial’s maintenance of consolidated net worth of at least $12.5 billion, which for this purpose is based on U.S. GAAP stockholders’ equity, excluding net unrealized gains and losses on investments. Our failure to satisfy these and other requirements contained in the credit facilities would restrict our access to the facilities when needed and, consequently, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our asset management operations include real estate held in Prudential Insurance separate accounts, for the benefit of clients, which enter into forward commitments which typically are funded from separate account assets and cash flows and related funding sources. Owing to the adverse credit and capital market conditions, these separate accounts may have difficulty funding in the normal course commitments due in 2009. In that case, Prudential Insurance might be called upon or required to provide interim funding solutions, which could affect the availability of liquidity for other purposes.

Governmental actions in response to the current financial crisis may not be effective and could subject us to additional regulation. Participation by us in certain of these governmental programs could also result in limitations or restrictions on our businesses or otherwise restrict our flexibility.

In response to the market dislocation affecting the banking system and financial markets, on October 3, 2008, President Bush signed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or EESA, into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Treasury has the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgage-backed and other securities from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing the financial markets. On October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced that it would use EESA authority to invest an aggregate of $250 billion (of the first $350 billion released under EESA) in capital issued by qualifying U.S. financial institutions under the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program, which is part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. The TARP Capital Purchase Program involves the issuance by qualifying institutions of preferred stock and warrants to purchase common stock to the U.S. Treasury. Concurrently, with the announcement of the TARP Capital Purchase Program in coordination with the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC announced the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, through which it guarantees certain newly issued senior unsecured debt issued by FDIC insured institutions and their qualifying holding companies, as well as funds over $250,000 in non-interest-bearing transaction deposit accounts. In addition, since March 2008, the Federal Reserve has created several lending facilities to stabilize financial markets including the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF. The TALF is designed to provide secured financing for certain types of asset-backed securities, including (as of July 2009) certain high-quality commercial mortgage-backed securities issued before January 1, 2009.

271

January 2009. The elements of the Financial Stability Plan, as described by the U.S. Treasury, are a Capital Assistance Program and Financial Stability Trust to make capital available to financial institutions through additional purchases of preferred stock, a Public-Private Investment Program, or PPIP, to buy legacy loans and assets from financial institutions, a Consumer and Business Lending Initiative to restart securitization markets for loans to consumers and businesses by expanding upon TALF, and a comprehensive housing program to, among other things, help reduce mortgage payments and interest rates. The U.S. Treasury has stated that the Financial Stability Plan will require high levels of transparency and accountability standards and dividend, acquisition and executive compensation restrictions for financial institutions that receive government assistance going forward.

In the first and second quarters of 2009, the U.S. Treasury, in conjunction with the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, announced details regarding the PPIP. The PPIP has two separate parts to address the problem of “legacy assets” —real estate loans held directly on the books of banks (“legacy loans”) and securities backed by loan portfolios (“legacy securities”). Under the Legacy Loans Program portion of the PPIP, the U.S. Treasury will invest alongside private investors in individual investment funds referred to as Public-Private Investment Funds, which will purchase eligible asset pools from depository institutions and the FDIC on a discrete basis. The FDIC will provide a guarantee for the debt financing issued by the Public-Private Investment Funds to fund the asset purchases. The FDIC has stated that it plans to test the funding mechanism contemplated by the Legacy Loan Program during the summer of 2009, but an official commencement date for the program has not been announced. Under the Legacy Securities Program, the U.S. Treasury will co-invest with, and provide leverage to pre- approved asset managers to support the market for certain legacy securities. Legacy securities eligible for the program include commercial mortgage backed and residential mortgage backed securities originated prior to 2009 with a rating of AAA at the time of origination. In July 2009, the U.S. Treasury selected nine firms to participate as fund managers in the initial round of the Legacy Securities Program and announced that it will invest up to $30 billion in the debt and equity of the corresponding Public-Private Investment Funds.

We applied in October 2008 to participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program, and in May 2009 we received preliminary approval from the U.S. Treasury to participate in the Program. However, on June 1, 2009. the Company announced that it would not participate in the Capital Purchase Program.

In the second half of 2009, we participated in TALF as an eligible borrower. As of June 30, 2009, we had $1,250 million of securities purchased under TALF that are reflected within “Other trading account assets” and received secured financing from the Federal Reserve of $1,167 million related to the purchase of these securities that is reflected within “long-term debt.” We also continue to evaluate participation in other government sponsored programs for which we may be eligible.

The U.S. federal government has taken or is considering taking other actions to address the financial crisis, including mortgage and credit card program modification proposals that could further impact our business and investments, particularly our mortgage and consumer debt related investments, which are significant. We cannot predict with any certainty whether these actions will be effective or the effect they may have on the financial markets or on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

On June 17, 2009, the Obama Administration announced proposals to reform the national regulation of various financial institutions. Depending on the manner of adoption of these or other proposals, we could become subject to increased federal regulation, either as a bank holding company or a “Tier 1 financial holding company”. Such regulation could involve higher capital requirements, limits on business activities, limits on leverage and other regulatory supervision, including by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. We cannot predict the form in which such proposals will be adopted (if at all) or their applicability to or effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

272

Market fluctuations and general economic, market and political conditions may adversely affect our business and profitability.

Even under relatively more favorable market conditions (such as those prevailing before the second half of 2007), our insurance products and certain of our investment products, as well as our investment returns and our access to and cost of financing, are sensitive to fixed income, equity, real estate and other market fluctuations and general economic, market and political conditions. These fluctuations and conditions could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and liquidity, including in the following respects:

•

The profitability of many of our insurance products depends in part on the value of the separate accounts supporting these products, which fluctuate substantially depending on the foregoing conditions.

•

Market conditions resulting in reductions in the value of assets we manage have an adverse effect on the revenues and profitability of our asset management services, which depend on fees related primarily to the value of assets under management, and could further decrease the value of our proprietary investments.

•

A change in market conditions, including prolonged periods of high inflation, could cause a change in consumer sentiment adversely affecting sales and persistency of our long-term savings and protection products. Similarly, changing economic conditions and unfavorable public perception of financial institutions can influence customer behavior including but not limited to increasing claims in certain product lines.

•

Sales of our investment-based and asset management products and services may decline and lapses and surrenders of variable life and annuity products and withdrawals of assets from other investment products may increase if a market downturn, increased market volatility or other market conditions result in customers becoming dissatisfied with their investments or products.

•

A market decline could further result in guaranteed minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products being higher than current account values or our pricing assumptions would support, requiring us to materially increase reserves for such products and may cause customers to retain contracts in force in order to benefit from the guarantees, thereby increasing their cost to us. Our valuation of the liabilities for the minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products requires us to consider the market perception of our risk of non-performance; and a decrease in our own credit spreads resulting from ratings upgrades or other events or market conditions could cause the recorded value of these liabilities to increase, which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.

•

Market conditions determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance protection we purchase. Accordingly, we may be forced to incur additional expenses for reinsurance or may not be able to obtain sufficient reinsurance on acceptable terms which could adversely affect the profitability of future business or our willingness to write future business.

•

Hedging instruments we hold to manage foreign exchange, product, and other risks might not perform as intended or expected resulting in higher realized losses and unforeseen cash needs. Market conditions can limit availability of hedging instruments and also further increase the cost of executing product related hedges and such costs may not be recovered in the pricing of the underlying products being hedged. Our hedging strategies rely on the performance of counterparties to such hedges. These counterparties may fail to perform for various reasons resulting in hedge ineffectiveness and higher losses.

•

We have significant investment and derivative portfolios, including but not limited to corporate and asset-backed securities, equities and commercial real estate. Economic conditions as well as adverse capital market conditions, including but not limited to a lack of buyers in the marketplace, volatility, credit spread changes, benchmark interest rate changes, and declines in value of underlying collateral will impact the credit quality, liquidity and value of our investments and derivatives, potentially resulting in higher capital charges and unrealized or realized losses, the latter especially if we were to

273

need to sell a significant amount of investments under such conditions. For example, a widening of credit spreads increases the net unrealized loss position of our investment portfolio and may ultimately result in increased realized losses. Values of our investments and derivatives can also be impacted by reductions in price transparency, changes in assumptions or inputs we use in estimating fair value and changes in investor confidence and preferences, potentially resulting in higher realized or unrealized losses. Volatility can make it difficult to value certain of our securities if trading becomes less frequent. As such, valuations may include assumptions or estimates that may have significant period to period changes which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition and in certain cases under U.S. GAAP such period to period changes in the value of investments are not recognized in our results of operations or consolidated statements of financial condition.

•

Regardless of market conditions, certain investments we hold, including private bonds and commercial mortgages, are relatively illiquid. If we needed to sell these investments, we may have difficulty doing so in a timely manner at a price that we could otherwise realize.

As described above, the period since the second half of 2007 has been characterized by extreme adverse market and economic conditions. The foregoing risks are even more pronounced in these unprecedented market and economic conditions.

Interest rate fluctuations could adversely affect our businesses and profitability.

Our insurance products and certain of our investment products, and our investment returns, are sensitive to interest rate fluctuations, and changes in interest rates could adversely affect our investment returns and results of operations, including in the following respects:

•

Some of our products expose us to the risk that changes in interest rates will reduce the spread between the amounts that we are required to pay under the contracts and the rate of return we are able to earn on our general account investments supporting the contracts. When interest rates decline, we have to reinvest the cash income from our investments in lower yielding instruments. Since many of our policies and contracts have guaranteed minimum interest or crediting rates or limit the resetting of interest rates, the spreads could decrease and potentially become negative. When interest rates rise, we may not be able to replace the assets in our general account with the higher yielding assets needed to fund the higher crediting rates necessary to keep these products and contracts competitive. This risk is heightened in the current market and economic environment, in which many desired securities are unavailable.

•

Changes in interest rates may reduce net investment income and thus our spread income which is a substantial portion of our profitability. Changes in interest rates can also result in potential losses in our investment activities in which we borrow funds and purchase investments to earn additional spread income on the borrowed funds. A decline in market interest rates could also reduce our returns from investment of equity.

•

When interest rates rise, policy loans and surrenders and withdrawals of life insurance policies and annuity contracts may increase as policyholders seek to buy products with perceived higher returns, requiring us to sell investment assets potentially resulting in realized investment losses, or requiring us to accelerate the amortization of DAC or VOBA (both defined below).

•

A decline in interest rates accompanied by unexpected prepayments of certain investments could result in reduced investments and a decline in our profitability. An increase in interest rates accompanied by unexpected extensions of certain lower yielding investments could result in a decline in our profitability.

•

Changes in the relationship between long-term and short-term interest rates could adversely affect the profitability of some of our products.

•

Changes in interest rates could increase our costs of financing.

•

Our mitigation efforts with respect to interest rate risk are primarily focused on maintaining an investment portfolio with diversified maturities that has a weighted average duration that is

274

approximately equal to the duration of our estimated liability cash flow profile. However, there are practical and capital market limitations on our ability to accomplish this, especially in some of our Asian operations, and our estimate of the liability cash flow profile may be inaccurate. Due to these and other factors we may need to liquidate investments prior to maturity at a loss in order to satisfy liabilities or be forced to reinvest funds in a lower rate environment. Although we take measures to manage the economic risks of investing in a changing interest rate environment, we may not be able to effectively mitigate, and may choose based on factors, including economic considerations, not to fully mitigate, the interest rate risk of our assets relative to our liabilities.

If our reserves for future policyholder benefits and claims are inadequate, we may be required to increase our reserves, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We establish and carry reserves to pay future policyholder benefits and claims. Our reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability, but rather are actuarial or statistical estimates based on models that include many assumptions and projections which are inherently uncertain and involve the exercise of significant judgment, including as to the levels of and/or timing of receipt or payment of premiums, benefits, claims, expenses, interest credits, investment results (including equity market returns), retirement, mortality, morbidity and persistency. We cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts that we will pay for, or the timing of payment of, actual benefits, claims and expenses or whether the assets supporting our policy liabilities, together with future premiums, will be sufficient for payment of benefits and claims. If we conclude that our reserves, together with future premiums, are insufficient to cover future policy benefits and claims, we would be required to increase our reserves and incur income statement charges for the period in which we make the determination, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

For certain of our products, market performance and interest rates impact the level of statutory reserves and statutory capital we are required to hold, and may have an adverse effect on returns on capital associated with these products. For example, equity market declines in the fourth quarter of 2008 caused a significant increase in the level of statutory reserves and statutory capital we are required to hold in relation to our Individual Annuities business. Capacity for reserve funding structures available in the marketplace is currently limited as a result of market conditions generally. Our ability to efficiently manage capital and economic reserve levels may be impacted, thereby impacting profitability and return on capital.

Our profitability may decline if mortality rates, morbidity rates or persistency rates differ significantly from our pricing expectations.

We set prices for many of our insurance and annuity products based upon expected claims and payment patterns, using assumptions for mortality rates, or likelihood of death, and morbidity rates, or likelihood of sickness, of our policyholders. In addition to the potential effect of natural or man-made disasters, significant changes in mortality or morbidity could emerge gradually over time, due to changes in the natural environment, the health habits of the insured population, treatment patterns for disease or disability, the economic environment, or other factors. Pricing of our insurance and deferred annuity products are also based in part upon expected persistency of these products, which is the probability that a policy or contract will remain in force from one period to the next. Persistency within our Individual Annuities business may be significantly impacted by the value of guaranteed minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products being higher than current account values in light of equity market declines. Results may also vary based on differences between actual and expected premium deposits and withdrawals for these products. The development of a secondary market for life insurance, including life settlements or “viaticals” and investor owned life insurance, could adversely affect the profitability of existing business and our pricing assumptions for new business. Significant deviations in actual experience from our pricing assumptions could have an adverse effect on the profitability of our products. Although some of our products permit us to increase premiums or adjust other charges and credits during the life of the policy or contract, the adjustments permitted under the terms of the policies or contracts may not be sufficient to maintain profitability. Many of our products do not permit us to increase premiums or adjust other charges and credits or limit those adjustments during the life of the policy or contract.

275

We may be required to accelerate the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, or DAC, or valuation of business acquired, or VOBA, or recognize impairment in the value of our goodwill or certain investments, or be required to establish a valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Deferred policy acquisition costs, or DAC, represent the costs that vary with and are related primarily to the acquisition of new and renewal insurance and annuity contracts, and we amortize these costs over the expected lives of the contracts. Valuation of business acquired, or VOBA, represents the present value of future profits embedded in acquired insurance, annuity and investment-type contracts and is amortized over the expected effective lives of the acquired contracts. Management, on an ongoing basis, tests the DAC and VOBA recorded on our balance sheet to determine if these amounts are recoverable under current assumptions. In addition, we regularly review the estimates and assumptions underlying DAC and VOBA for those products for which we amortize DAC and VOBA in proportion to gross profits or gross margins. Given changes in facts and circumstances, these tests and reviews could lead to further reductions in DAC and/or VOBA that could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations and our financial condition. Significant or sustained equity market declines as well as investment could result in acceleration of amortization of the DAC and VOBA related to variable annuity and variable universal life contracts, resulting in a charge to income.

Goodwill represents the excess of the amounts we paid to acquire subsidiaries and other businesses over the fair value of their net assets at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is assessed annually for potential impairment, or more frequently if conditions warrant, by comparing the carrying value (equity attributed to a business to support its risk) of a business to its estimated fair value at that date. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the significant equity, real estate and other market declines resulted in declines in the fair value, or increases in the level of equity required to support, certain of our businesses. As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2008 we recognized an impairment of goodwill of $337 million of which $97 million related to our Individual Annuities business, $123 million related to our International Investments business, and $117 million related to our Real Estate and Relocation business, which amounts reflected the entire balance of goodwill associated with these businesses. As of June 30, 2009, we had a goodwill balance of $706 million, including $444 million related to our Retirement business and $241 million related to our Asset Management business. Market declines or other events impacting the fair value of these businesses, or increases in the level of equity required to support these businesses, could result in additional goodwill impairments, resulting in a charge to income.

In the fourth quarter of 2008, declines in financial markets impacted the fair value of certain equity method investments, particularly in our International Investments business, which resulted in a charge to income for an impairment of these investments of $316 million. Further declines in the fair value of these investments, which have a remaining carrying value of approximately $300 million as of June 30, 2009, may require that we review the remaining carrying value of these investments for potential impairment, and such review could result in additional impairments and charges to income.

Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are assessed periodically by management to determine if they are realizable. Factors in management’s determination include the performance of the business including the ability to generate capital gains from a variety of sources and tax planning strategies. If based on available information, it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax asset will not be realized then a valuation allowance must be established with a corresponding charge to net income. Such charges could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

Our valuation of fixed maturity, equity and trading securities may include methodologies, estimations and assumptions that are subject to differing interpretations and could result in changes to investment valuations that may materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

During periods of market disruption, such as the unprecedented market conditions since the second half of 2007, it may be difficult to value certain of our securities, such as sub-prime mortgage backed securities, if

276

trading becomes less frequent and/or market data becomes less observable. There are and may continue to be certain asset classes that were in active markets with significant observable data that become illiquid due to the current financial environment or market conditions. As a result, valuations may include inputs and assumptions that are less observable or require greater estimation and judgment as well as valuation methods which are more complex. These values may not be ultimately realizable in a market transaction, and such values may change very rapidly as market conditions change and valuation assumptions are modified. Decreases in value may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

The decision on whether to record an other-than-temporary impairment or write-down is determined in part by management’s assessment of the financial condition and prospects of a particular issuer, projections of future cash flows and recoverability of the particular security. Management’s conclusions on such assessments are highly judgmental and include assumptions and projections of future cash flows which may ultimately prove to be incorrect as assumptions, facts and circumstances change.

For a discussion of certain fixed maturity securities where the estimated fair value has declined and remained below amortized cost by more than 20%, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Realized Investment Gains and Losses and General Account Investments—Unrealized Losses from Fixed Maturity Securities.”

We have experienced and may experience additional downgrades in our claims-paying or credit ratings. A downgrade or potential downgrade in our claims-paying or credit ratings could limit our ability to market products, increase the number or value of policies being surrendered, increase our borrowing costs and/or hurt our relationships with creditors or trading counterparties and restrict our access to alternative sources of liquidity.

Claims-paying ratings, which are sometimes referred to as “financial strength” ratings, represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding the financial ability of an insurance company to meet its obligations under an insurance policy, and are important factors affecting public confidence in an insurer and its competitive position in marketing products, including Prudential Insurance and our other insurance company subsidiaries. Credit ratings represent the opinions of rating agencies regarding an entity’s ability to repay its indebtedness, and Prudential Financial’s credit ratings are important to our ability to raise capital through the issuance of debt and to the cost of such financing. A downgrade in our claims-paying or credit ratings could potentially, among other things, limit our ability to market products, reduce our competitiveness, increase the number or value of policy surrenders and withdrawals, increase our borrowing costs and potentially make it more difficult to borrow funds, adversely affect the availability of financial guarantees, such as letters of credit, cause additional collateral requirements under certain agreements, allow counterparties to terminate derivative agreements, and/or hurt our relationships with creditors or trading counterparties. In addition, actions we might take to access third party financing or to realign our capital structure may in turn cause rating agencies to reevaluate our ratings.

In view of the difficulties experienced recently by many financial institutions, the rating agencies have heightened the level of scrutiny that they apply to such institutions, have increased the frequency and scope of their credit reviews, have requested additional information from the companies that they rate, and may adjust upward the capital and other requirements employed in the rating agency models for maintenance of certain ratings levels, such as the financial strength ratings currently held by our life insurance subsidiaries. The outcome of such reviews may have adverse ratings consequences, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition.

In late September and early October, 2008, A.M. Best Company, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd., Moody’s Investors Service, and Standard & Poor’s, respectively, each revised its outlook for the U.S. life insurance sector to negative from stable, citing, among other things, the significant deterioration and volatility in the credit and equity markets, economic and political uncertainty, and the expected impact of realized and unrealized investment losses on life insurers’ capital levels and profitability. For a description of the Company’s claims-

277

paying and credit ratings and the significant changes to those ratings and rating outlooks in 2009, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Ratings.”

Both Prudential Financial’s and Prudential Funding’s commercial paper programs were granted approval to participate in the Federal Reserve’s Commercial Paper Funding Facility, or CPFF, during the fourth quarter of 2008. Commercial paper issuers must maintain ratings of at least A-1/P-1/F1 by two rating agencies in order to be eligible for CPFF. On February 19, 2009, Prudential Financial’s commercial paper rating was downgraded by Fitch from F1 to F2 and, consequently, as of that date, Prudential Financial was no longer eligible to issue commercial paper under the CPFF. As of the date of this filing, Prudential Funding’s commercial paper is rated A-1+/P-1/F1; however, as noted above, on March 18, 2009, Moody’s placed Prudential Funding’s commercial paper rating on review for possible downgrade and the Fitch rating has a negative outlook. If Prudential Funding fails to maintain the required A-1/P-1/F1 ratings by at least two rating agencies, its program would no longer be eligible for CPFF, and we would lose our access to CPFF completely.

Prudential Insurance has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, or FHLBNY, since June 2008. Membership allows Prudential Insurance to participate in FHLBNY’s product line of financial services, including collateralized advances, collateralized funding agreements and general asset/liability management that can be used for liquidity management and as an alternative source of funding. Under FHLBNY guidelines, if Prudential Insurance’s claims-paying ratings decline below certain levels, and the FHLBNY does not receive written assurances from the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance regarding Prudential Insurance’s solvency, new borrowings from the FHLBNY would be limited to a term of 90 days or less. Although Prudential Insurance’s ratings are currently at or above the required minimum levels, there can be no assurance that the ratings will remain at these levels in the future.

We cannot predict what additional actions rating agencies may take, or what actions we may take in response to the actions of rating agencies, which could adversely affect our business. As with other companies in the financial services industry, our ratings could be downgraded at any time and without notice by any rating agency.

Ratings downgrades and changes in credit spreads may require us to post collateral, thereby affecting our liquidity, and we may be unable to effectively implement certain capital management activities as a result, or for other reasons.

A downgrade in the credit or financial strength ratings of Prudential Financial or its rated subsidiaries could result in additional collateral requirements or other required payments under certain agreements, including derivative agreements, which are eligible to be satisfied in cash or by posting securities held by the subsidiaries subject to the agreements. A ratings downgrade of three ratings levels from the ratings levels at June 30, 2009 would result in estimated collateral posting requirements or payments under such agreements of approximately $200 million. In addition, a ratings downgrade by A.M. Best to “A-” for our domestic life insurance companies would require Prudential Insurance to post a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $1.4 billion, based on the level of statutory reserves related to an acquired business, that we estimate would result in annual cash outflows of approximately $70 million, or collateral posting in the form of cash or securities to be held in a trust.

In addition, agreements in connection with capital management activities for our universal life insurance products would require us to post cash collateral based on tests that consider the level of 10-year credit default swap spreads on Prudential Financial’s senior debt. As of June 30, 2009, when estimates of Prudential Financial’s 10-year credit default swap spreads were approximately 490 basis points, we had posted $53 million of collateral under this agreement.

278

insurers to establish statutory reserves for term and universal life insurance policies with long-term premium guarantees that are consistent with the statutory reserves required for other individual life insurance policies with similar guarantees. Many market participants believe that this level of reserves is excessive, and we have implemented reinsurance and capital management actions to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX on our term and universal life insurance business. However, we may not be able to implement actions to mitigate the impact of Regulation XXX or Guideline AXXX on our term or universal life insurance products, thereby potentially resulting in an adverse impact on returns on capital associated with these products, and possibly requiring us to reduce our sales of these products or implement measures that may be disruptive to our business. As we continue to underwrite term and universal life business, we expect to have borrowing needs in 2009 to finance statutory reserves required under Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX. Several strategies are currently under review to reduce the strain of increased AXXX and XXX statutory reserves associated with our term and universal life products. The activities we may undertake to mitigate or address these needs include obtaining letters of credit, entering into reinsurance transactions or executing other capital market strategies; however, our ability to successfully execute these strategies may depend on market conditions. Further, we have $300 million currently available under our XXX notes facility. Absent any successful mitigation efforts and assuming full usage of the XXX notes facility, we currently believe that our financing need for 2009 could be up to $200 million for XXX and AXXX combined, but this amount may fluctuate due to changes in market conditions or product sales. If we are unsuccessful in satisfying or mitigating this strain as a result of market conditions or otherwise, this financing need could have an adverse effect on our overall liquidity and capital and could require us to increase prices and/or reduce our sales of term or universal life products.

Losses due to defaults by others, including issuers of investment securities or reinsurance, bond insurers and derivative instrument counterparties, downgrades in the ratings of securities we hold or of bond insurers, insolvencies of insurers in jurisdictions where we write business and other factors affecting our counterparties or the value of their securities could adversely affect the value of our investments, the realization of amounts contractually owed to us, result in assessments or additional statutory capital requirements or reduce our profitability or sources of liquidity.

Issuers and borrowers whose securities or loans we hold, customers, vendors, trading counterparties, counterparties under swaps and other derivative contracts, reinsurers, clearing agents, exchanges, clearing houses and other financial intermediaries and guarantors, including bond insurers, may default on their obligations to us or be unable to perform service functions that are significant to our business due to bankruptcy, insolvency, lack of liquidity, adverse economic conditions, operational failure, fraud or other reasons. Such defaults, instances of which have occurred in recent months, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. A downgrade in the ratings of bond insurers could also result in declines in the value of our fixed maturity investments supported by guarantees from bond insurers.

In addition, we use derivative instruments to hedge various risks, including certain guaranteed minimum benefits contained in many of our variable annuity products. We enter into a variety of derivative instruments, including options, forwards, interest rate, credit default and currency swaps with a number of counterparties. Our obligations under our variable annuity products are not changed by our hedging activities and we are liable for our obligations even if our derivative counterparties do not pay us. This is a more pronounced risk to us in view of the recent stresses suffered by financial institutions. Such defaults could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Under state insurance guaranty association laws and similar laws in international jurisdictions, we are subject to assessments, based on the share of business we write in the relevant jurisdiction, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants.

Amounts that we expect to collect under current and future contracts, including proceeds we expect to realize from the intended put of our Wachovia Securities joint venture interests to Wells Fargo, are subject to counterparty risk. Wells Fargo has notified us that it intends to pay an unspecified portion of such proceeds in

279

Wells Fargo common stock. The Company will bear the risk of changes in the market value of the portion of such proceeds received in Wells Fargo common stock. The ability of the Company to hedge such market risk may be limited and our ability to dispose of such stock will be subject to securities law and other restrictions.

The eligible collateral that Prudential Insurance is required to pledge to the FHLBNY in support of its borrowings includes qualifying mortgage-related assets, such as commercial mortgage-backed securities. Recently, the major rating agencies have downgraded the credit ratings of certain commercial mortgage-backed securities and may continue to do so. If future downgrades affect the commercial mortgage-backed securities pledged by Prudential Insurance to the FHLBNY, those securities would no longer constitute eligible collateral under FHLBNY guidelines. This could require Prudential Insurance to repay outstanding borrowings or to pledge replacement collateral to the FHLBNY, which could materially reduce the Company’s borrowing capacity from the FHLBNY and/or prevent use of that replacement collateral for asset-based financing transactions.

Intense competition, including the impact of government sponsored programs and other actions on us and our competitors, could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase our market share or profitability.

In each of our businesses we face intense competition from domestic and foreign insurance companies, asset managers and diversified financial institutions, both for the ultimate customers for our products and, in many businesses, for distribution through non-affiliated distribution channels. We compete based on a number of factors including brand recognition, reputation, quality of service, quality of investment advice, investment performance of our products, product features, scope of distribution and distribution arrangements, price, perceived financial strength and claims-paying and credit ratings. A decline in our competitive position as to one or more of these factors could adversely affect our profitability and assets under management. Many of our competitors are large and well established and some have greater market share or breadth of distribution, offer a broader range of products, services or features, assume a greater level of risk, have lower profitability expectations or have higher claims-paying or credit ratings than we do. We could be subject to claims by competitors that our products infringe their patents, which could adversely affect our sales, profitability and financial position. The proliferation and growth of non-affiliated distribution channels puts pressure on our captive sales channels to increase their productivity and reduce their costs in order to remain competitive, and we run the risk that the marketplace will make a more significant or rapid shift to non-affiliated or direct distribution alternatives than we anticipate or are able to achieve ourselves, potentially adversely affecting our market share and results of operations. Competition for personnel in all of our businesses is intense, including for Prudential Agents, Life Planners and Life Advisors, other face-to-face sales personnel, desirable non-affiliated distribution channels and our investment managers. The loss of personnel could have an adverse effect on our business and profitability. As noted above, if we were to participate in certain U.S. government financial assistance programs, we would become subject to various restrictions, including restrictions on executive compensation, that could harm our competitive position..

The adverse market and economic conditions that began in the second half of 2007 and have continued can be expected to result in changes in the competitive landscape. For example, the financial distress experienced by certain financial services industry participants as a result of such conditions may lead to favorable acquisition opportunities, although our ability or that of our competitors to pursue such opportunities may be limited due to lower earnings, reserve increases, and a lack of access to debt capital markets and other sources of financing. Such conditions may also lead to changes by us or our competitors in product offerings, product pricing and business mix that could affect our and their relative sales volumes, market shares and profitability. It is also possible that such conditions may put U.S. companies like us with financial operations in non-U.S. locations at a competitive disadvantage relative to domestic companies operating in those locations and may impact sales in those locations. Additionally, the competitive landscape in which we operate may be further affected by the government sponsored programs in the U.S. and similar governmental actions outside of the U.S. in response to the severe dislocations in financial markets. Competitors receiving governmental financing or other assistance or subsidies, including governmental guarantees of their obligations, may obtain pricing or other competitive advantages.

280

Changes in U.S. federal income tax law or in the income tax laws of other jurisdictions in which we operate could make some of our products less attractive to consumers and increase our tax costs.

Current U.S. federal income tax laws generally permit certain holders to defer taxation on the build-up of value of annuities and life insurance products until payments are actually made to the policyholder or other beneficiary and to exclude from taxation the death benefit paid under a life insurance contract. Congress from time to time considers legislation that could make our products less attractive to consumers, including legislation that would reduce or eliminate the benefit of this deferral on some annuities and insurance products, as well as other types of changes that could reduce or eliminate the attractiveness of annuities and life insurance products to consumers, such as repeal of the estate tax.

For example, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 generally provided for lower income tax, capital gains and dividend tax rates that had the effect of reducing the benefits of tax deferral on the build-up of value of annuities and life insurance products. Continuation of these reduced rates, which are due to sunset in 2011, may hinder our sales and result in the increased surrender of insurance and annuity products.

Congress, as well as state and local governments, also considers from time to time legislation that could increase the amount of corporate taxes we pay. For example, changes in the law relating to tax reserving methodologies for term life or universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees could result in higher corporate taxes. If such legislation is adopted our consolidated net income could decline.

The U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have indicated that they intend to address through regulations the methodology to be followed in determining the dividends received deduction, or DRD, related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The DRD reduces the amount of dividend income subject to tax and is a significant component of the difference between our actual tax expense and expected amount determined using the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. A change in the DRD, including the possible retroactive or prospective elimination of this deduction through regulations or legislation, could increase our actual tax expense and reduce our consolidated net income.

On May 11, 2009, the Obama Administration released the “General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals.” Although the Administration has not released proposed statutory language, the “General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals” includes proposals which if enacted, would affect the taxation of life insurance companies and certain life insurance products. In particular, the proposals would affect the treatment of corporate owned life insurance policies, or COLIs, by limiting the availability of certain interest deductions for companies that purchase those policies. The proposals would also change the method used to determine the amount of dividend income received by a life insurance company on assets held in separate accounts used to support products, including variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts, that is eligible for the DRD. If proposals of this type were enacted, the Company’s sale of COLI, variable annuities, and variable life products could be adversely affected and the Company’s actual tax expense could increase, reducing earnings.

The General Explanation of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals also includes proposals that would change the method by which multinational corporations could claim credits for the foreign taxes they pay and that would change the timing of deductions for expenses that are allocable to foreign-source income. More specifically, it is likely that the proposals would impose additional restrictions on the Company’s ability to claim foreign tax credits on un-repatriated earnings. The proposals would also require U.S. multinationals to defer certain deductions for ordinary and necessary business expenses that are allocable to foreign source income until that related income is subject to U.S. tax. Unused deductions would be carried forward to future years. If proposals of this type were enacted, the Company’s actual tax expense could increase, reducing earnings.

The products we sell have different tax characteristics, in some cases generating tax deductions. The level of profitability of certain of our products are significantly dependent on these characteristics and our ability to

281

continue to generate taxable income, which are taken into consideration when pricing products and are a component of our capital management strategies. Accordingly, a change in tax law, our ability to generate taxable income, or other factors impacting the availability of the tax characteristics generated by our products, could impact product pricing and returns or require us to reduce our sales of these products or implement other actions that could be disruptive to our business.

We have substantial international operations and our international operations face political, legal, operational and other risks that could adversely affect those operations or our profitability.

A substantial portion of our revenues and income from continuing operations is derived from our operations outside the U.S., primarily Japan and Korea. These operations are subject to restrictions on transferring funds out of the countries in which these operations are located. Some of our foreign insurance and investment management operations are, and are likely to continue to be, in emerging markets where this risk as well as risks of discriminatory regulation, labor issues in connection with workers’ associations and trade unions, price controls, currency exchange controls, nationalization or expropriation of assets, are heightened. If our business model is not successful in a particular country, we may lose all or most of our investment in building and training our sales force in that country.

Many of our insurance products sold in international markets provide for the buildup of cash values for the policyholder at contractually fixed guaranteed interest rates, including in Japan. Actual returns on the underlying investments do not necessarily match the guaranteed interest rates and there may be times when the spread between the actual investment returns and these guaranteed rates of return to the policyholder is negative and in which this negative spread may not be offset by the mortality, morbidity and expense charges we earn on the products.

Our international businesses are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the countries in which they are organized and in which they operate. Foreign governments from time to time consider legislation that could increase the amount of taxes that we pay or impact the sales of our products. For example, during 2007, Mexico enacted an alternative flat tax that became effective in 2008. In March 2007, the Japanese National Tax Authority, or NTA, indicated that it would change the tax treatment of certain term life products sold to corporations, which resulted in a significant decrease in the sale of Increasing Term Life insurance to corporations in Japan. On December 26, 2007, the NTA confirmed in an official announcement its intention to revise the corporate tax deductibility of insurance premiums paid with respect to certain Increasing Term insurance products. The NTA then released a revised tax circular that reduced, but did not eliminate, the corporate tax deductibility of insurance premiums paid with respect to Increasing Term insurance products sold after February 28, 2008.

Our international operations are regulated in the jurisdictions in which they are located or operate. These regulations may apply heightened scrutiny to non-domestic companies, which can reduce our flexibility as to intercompany transactions, investments and other aspects of business operations and adversely affect our liquidity and profitability.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our profitability and cash flow.

As a U.S.-based company with significant business operations outside the U.S., particularly in Japan, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange risks that could reduce U.S. dollar equivalent earnings and equity of these operations as well as negatively impact our general account and other proprietary investment portfolios. We seek to mitigate these risks by employing various hedging strategies including entering into derivative contracts and holding U.S. dollar denominated assets within our Japanese subsidiaries. Currency fluctuations, including the effect of changes in the value of U.S. dollar investments that vary from the amounts ultimately needed to hedge our exposure to changes in the U.S. dollar equivalent of earnings and equity of these operations, may adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. Additionally, U.S. dollar denominated

282

investments held in our Japanese subsidiaries could result, in the event of a material adverse event, such as a significant cataclysmic mortality event, coupled with a dramatic strengthening in the yen, in additional liquidity or capital needs for our International Insurance operations.

Our businesses are heavily regulated and changes in regulation may reduce our profitability.

Our businesses are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision. The purpose of this regulation is primarily to protect our customers and not necessarily our shareholders. Many of the laws and regulations to which we are subject, including those to which our international businesses are subject, are regularly re-examined, and existing or future laws and regulations may become more restrictive or otherwise adversely affect our operations. This is particularly the case under current market conditions. It appears likely that the continuing financial markets dislocation will lead to extensive changes in existing laws and regulations, and regulatory frameworks, applicable to our businesses in the U.S. and internationally.

Prudential Financial is subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE relating to public reporting and disclosure, securities trading, accounting and financial reporting, and corporate governance matters. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules and regulations adopted in furtherance of that Act have substantially increased the requirements in these and other areas for public companies such as Prudential Financial.

Many insurance regulatory and other governmental or self-regulatory bodies have the authority to review our products and business practices and those of our agents and employees and to bring regulatory or other legal actions against us if, in their view, our practices, or those of our agents or employees, are improper. These actions can result in substantial fines, penalties or prohibitions or restrictions on our business activities and could adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations or financial condition. For a discussion of material pending litigation and regulatory matters, see “Contingent Liabilities and Litigation and Regulatory Matters” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Congress from time to time considers pension reform legislation that could decrease the attractiveness of certain of our retirement products and services to retirement plan sponsors and administrators, or have an unfavorable effect on our ability to earn revenues from these products and services. In this regard, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (“PPA”) makes significant changes in employer pension funding obligations associated with defined benefit pension plans which are likely to increase sponsors’ costs of maintaining these plans. These changes could hinder our sales of defined benefit pension products and services and cause sponsors to discontinue existing plans for which we provide asset management, administrative, or other services, but could increase the attractiveness of certain group annuity products we offer in connection with terminating pension plans. Certain tax-favored savings initiatives that have been proposed could hinder sales and persistency of our products and services that support employment based retirement plans.

Insurance regulators, as well as industry participants, have also begun to consider potentially significant changes in the way in which statutory reserves and statutory capital are determined, particularly for products with embedded options and guarantees. New regulatory capital requirements have already gone into effect for variable annuity products and new reserving requirements for these products are scheduled to be implemented as of the end of 2009. The timing of, and extent of, such changes to the statutory reporting framework are uncertain; however, the result could be increases to statutory reserves and capital, and an adverse effect on our products, sales and operating costs. Moreover, insurance regulators recently deferred mandatory adoption of changes to the statutory accounting rules for loan-backed and structured securities. Further changes to these rules by insurance regulators, or the timing of the Company’s application of these rules, are possible, given the deferral and other uncertainty around the resolution of these accounting rules.

In view of recent events involving certain financial institutions, it is likely that the U.S. federal government will heighten its oversight of companies in the financial services industry such as us, including broad regulations intended to address systemic risks to the financial system. The Obama Administration has proposed the creation

283

of an Office of National Insurance within the U.S. Treasury. In recently circulated draft legislation, the Administration has proposed that the role of the Office of National Insurance would be, among other things, to monitor the insurance industry, designate insurers or their affiliates as entities subject to regulation as “Tier 1 financial holding companies”, as discussed above, gather information, develop expertise, negotiate international agreements, and coordinate policy in the insurance sector. We cannot predict whether this or other proposals will be adopted, or what impact, if any, such proposals or, if enacted, such laws, could have on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Significant regulatory changes are under consideration in other jurisdictions as well, as they consider their responses to current financial industry issues.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations is time consuming and personnel-intensive, and changes in these laws and regulations may materially increase our direct and indirect compliance and other expenses of doing business, thus having a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

See “Business—Regulation” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for further discussion of the impact of regulations on our businesses.

Legal and regulatory actions are inherent in our businesses and could adversely affect our results of operations or financial position or harm our businesses or reputation.

We are, and in the future may be, subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of our businesses, including in businesses that we have divested or placed in wind-down status. Some of these proceedings have been brought on behalf of various alleged classes of complainants. In certain of these matters, the plaintiffs are seeking large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. Substantial legal liability in these or future legal or regulatory actions could have an adverse affect on us or cause us reputational harm, which in turn could harm our business prospects.

Material pending litigation and regulatory matters affecting us, and certain risks to our businesses presented by such matters, are discussed under “Contingent Liabilities and Litigation and Regulatory Matters” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, their outcome cannot be predicted. Our reserves for litigation and regulatory matters may prove to be inadequate. It is possible that our results of operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation and regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. In light of the unpredictability of the Company’s litigation and regulatory matters, it is also possible that in certain cases an ultimate unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or regulatory matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.

The occurrence of natural or man-made disasters could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The occurrence of natural disasters, including hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, fires, explosions, pandemic disease and man-made disasters, including acts of terrorism and military actions, could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition, including in the following respects:

•

Catastrophic loss of life due to natural or man-made disasters could cause us to pay benefits at higher levels and/or materially earlier than anticipated and could lead to unexpected changes in persistency rates.

•

A natural or man-made disaster could result in losses in our investment portfolio or the failure of our counterparties to perform, or cause significant volatility in global financial markets.

•

A terrorist attack affecting financial institutions in the United States or elsewhere could negatively impact the financial services industry in general and our business operations, investment portfolio and profitability in particular. As previously reported, in August 2004, the U.S. Department of Homeland

284

Security identified our Newark, New Jersey facilities, along with those of several other financial institutions in New York and Washington, D.C., as possible targets of a terrorist attack.

•

Pandemic disease, caused by a virus such as H5N1, the “avian flu” virus, or H1N1, the “swine flu” virus, could have a severe adverse effect on Prudential Financial’s business. The potential impact of such a pandemic on Prudential Financial’s results of operations and financial position is highly speculative, and would depend on numerous factors, including: in the case of the avian flu virus, the probability of the virus mutating to a form that can be passed easily from human to human; the effectiveness of vaccines and the rate of contagion; the regions of the world most affected; the effectiveness of treatment for the infected population; the rates of mortality and morbidity among various segments of the insured versus the uninsured population; the collectability of reinsurance; the possible macroeconomic effects of a pandemic on the Company’s asset portfolio; the effect on lapses and surrenders of existing policies, as well as sales of new policies; and many other variables.

There can be no assurance that our business continuation plans and insurance coverages would be effective in mitigating any negative effects on our operations or profitability in the event of a terrorist attack or other disaster.

Our risk management policies and procedures and our minority investments in joint ventures may leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risk, which could adversely affect our businesses or result in losses.

Our policies and procedures to monitor and manage risks, including hedging programs that utilize derivative financial instruments, may not be fully effective and may leave us exposed to unidentified and unanticipated risks. The Company uses models in its hedging programs and many other aspects of its operations, including but not limited to the estimation of actuarial reserves, the amortization of deferred acquisition costs and the value of business acquired, and the valuation of certain other assets and liabilities. These models rely on assumptions and projections that are inherently uncertain. Management of operational, legal and regulatory risks requires, among other things, policies and procedures to record properly and verify a large number of transactions and events, and these policies and procedures may not be fully effective. Past or future misconduct by our employees or employees of our vendors could result in violations of law by us, regulatory sanctions and/or serious reputational or financial harm and the precautions we take to prevent and detect this activity may not be effective in all cases. A failure of our computer systems or a compromise of their security could also subject us to regulatory sanctions or other claims, harm our reputation, interrupt our operations and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

In our investments in which we hold a minority interest, including our Wachovia Securities joint venture, we lack management and operational control over its operations, which may prevent us from taking or causing to be taken actions to protect or increase the value of those investments.

We face risks arising from acquisitions, divestitures and restructurings, including client losses, surrenders and withdrawals, difficulties in integrating and realizing the projected results of acquisitions and contingent liabilities with respect to dispositions.

We face a number of risks arising from acquisition transactions, including the risk that, following the acquisition or reorganization of a business, we could experience client losses, surrenders or withdrawals or other results materially different from those we anticipate, as well as difficulties in integrating and realizing the projected results of acquisitions and restructurings and managing the litigation and regulatory matters to which acquired entities are party. We have retained insurance or reinsurance obligations and other contingent liabilities in connection with our divestiture or winding down of various businesses, including with respect to the retail securities brokerage and securities clearing operations that we contributed to the joint venture with Wachovia Corporation, and our reserves for these obligations and liabilities may prove to be inadequate. These risks may adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

285

Changes in our discount rate, expected rate of return and expected compensation increase assumptions for our pension and other postretirement benefit plans may result in increased expenses and reduce our profitability.

We determine our pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs based on assumed discount rates, expected rates of return on plan assets and expected increases in compensation levels and trends in health care costs. Changes in these assumptions may result in increased expenses and reduce our profitability.

Our ability to pay shareholder dividends, to engage in share repurchases and to meet obligations may be adversely affected by limitations imposed on inter-affiliate distributions and transfers by Prudential Insurance and our other subsidiaries.

Prudential Financial is the holding company for all our operations, and dividends, returns of capital and interest income from its subsidiaries are the principal source of funds available to Prudential Financial to pay shareholder dividends, to make share repurchases and to meet its other obligations. These sources of funds may be complemented by Prudential Financial’s access, if available, to the financial markets and bank facilities. As described under “Business—Regulation” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our domestic and foreign insurance and various other subsidiary companies, including Prudential Insurance, are subject to regulatory limitations on the payment of dividends and on other transfers of funds to Prudential Financial. In addition to these regulatory limitations, the terms of the IHC debt contain restrictions potentially limiting dividends by Prudential Insurance applicable to the Financial Services Businesses in the event the Closed Block Business is in financial distress and under other circumstances. Finally, our management of Prudential Insurance and other subsidiaries to have capitalization consistent with their ratings objectives itself constrains their payment of dividends. For example, we anticipate that, unless market conditions improve, the dividend capacity of Prudential Insurance will be substantially constrained in 2009 by the capital requirements of our financial strength ratings targets. These restrictions on Prudential Financial’s subsidiaries may limit or prevent such subsidiaries from making dividend payments to Prudential Financial in an amount sufficient to fund Prudential Financial’s cash requirements and shareholder dividends. From time to time, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, and various state and foreign insurance regulators have considered, and may in the future consider, proposals to further limit dividend payments that an insurance company may make without regulatory approval.

Difficult market conditions also affect our ability to pay shareholder dividends and to engage in share repurchases. Our practice is to declare and pay dividends annually and the decision whether to declare any Common Stock dividend with respect to 2009 will be made in the fourth quarter of 2009. We announced on October 9, 2008, that, in light of recent market volatility and extraordinary events and developments affecting financial markets generally, we were suspending purchases of Common Stock under our 2008 share repurchase program, effective October 10, 2008. We do not anticipate reinstituting a share repurchase program in 2009.

Regulatory requirements, provisions of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and our shareholder rights plan could delay, deter or prevent a takeover attempt that shareholders might consider in their best interests.

Various states in which our insurance companies are domiciled, including New Jersey, must approve any direct or indirect change of control of insurance companies organized in those states. Under most states’ statutes, an entity is presumed to have control of an insurance company if it owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting stock of that insurance company or its parent company. Federal, and in some cases, state, banking authorities would also have to approve the indirect change of control of our banking operations. The federal securities laws could also require reapproval by customers of our investment advisory contracts to manage mutual funds, including mutual funds included in annuity products, upon a change in control. In addition, the New Jersey Business Corporation Act prohibits certain business combinations with interested shareholders.

286

These regulatory and other restrictions may delay a potential merger or sale of Prudential Financial, even if the Board of Directors decides that it is in the best interests of shareholders to merge or be sold.

Prudential Financial’s certificate of incorporation and by-laws also contain provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a takeover attempt that shareholders might consider in their best interests. These provisions may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our Common Stock and include: a restriction on the filling of vacancies on the Board of Directors by shareholders; restrictions on the calling of special meetings by shareholders; a requirement that shareholders may take action without a meeting only by unanimous written consent; advance notice procedures for the nomination of candidates to the Board of Directors and shareholder proposals to be considered at shareholder meetings; and supermajority voting requirements for the amendment of certain provisions of the certificate of incorporation and by-laws. Prudential Financial’s shareholders rights plan also creates obstacles that may delay, deter or prevent a takeover attempt that shareholders might consider in their best interests.

Holders of our Common Stock are subject to risks due to the issuance of our Class B Stock, a second class of common stock.

The businesses of Prudential Financial are separated into the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business, and our Common Stock reflects the performance of the Financial Services Businesses and the Class B Stock reflects the performance of the Closed Block Business. There are a number of risks to holders of our Common Stock by virtue of this dual common stock structure, including:

•

Even though we allocate all our consolidated assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and cash flow between the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business for financial statement purposes, there is no legal separation between the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business. Holders of Common Stock have no interest in a separate legal entity representing the Financial Services Businesses; holders of the Class B Stock have no interest in a separate legal entity representing the Closed Block Business; and therefore holders of each class of common stock are subject to all of the risks associated with an investment in the Company.

•

The financial results of the Closed Block Business, including debt service on the IHC debt, will affect Prudential Financial’s consolidated results of operations, financial position and borrowing costs.

•

The market value of our Common Stock may not reflect solely the performance of the Financial Services Businesses.

•

We cannot pay cash dividends on our Common Stock for any period if we choose not to pay dividends on the Class B Stock in an aggregate amount at least equal to the lesser of the CB Distributable Cash Flow or the Target Dividend Amount on the Class B Stock for that period. See “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Convertibility” in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the definition of these terms. Any net losses of the Closed Block Business, and any dividends or distributions on, or repurchases of the Class B Stock, would reduce the assets of Prudential Financial legally available for dividends on the Common Stock.

•

Net income for the Financial Services Businesses and the Closed Block Business includes general and administrative expenses charged to each of the respective Businesses based on the Company’s methodology for the allocation of such expenses. Cash flows to the Financial Services Businesses from the Closed Block Business related to administrative expenses are determined by a policy servicing fee arrangement that is based upon insurance and policies in force and statutory cash premiums. The difference between the administrative expenses allocated to the Closed Block Business and these cash flow amounts are recorded, on an after tax basis, as direct equity adjustments to the equity balances of the businesses and included in the determination of earnings per share for each Business. A change in cash flow amounts between the Businesses that is inconsistent with changes in general and administrative expenses we incur will affect the earnings per share of the Common Stock and Class B Stock.

287

•

Holders of Common Stock and Class B Stock vote together as a single class of common stock under New Jersey law, except as otherwise required by law and except that the holders of the Class B Stock have class voting or consent rights with respect to specified matters directly affecting the Class B Stock.

•

Shares of Class B Stock are entitled to a higher proportionate amount upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of Prudential Financial, than shares of Common Stock.

•

We may exchange the Class B Stock for shares of Common Stock at any time, and the Class B Stock is mandatorily exchangeable in the event of a sale of all or substantially all of the Closed Block Business or a “change of control” of Prudential Financial. Under these circumstances, shares of Class B Stock would be exchanged for shares of Common Stock with an aggregate average market value equal to 120% of the then appraised “Fair Market Value” of the Class B Stock. For a description of “change of control” and “Fair Market Value,” see “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Convertibility” in our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Holders of Class B Stock may at their discretion, beginning in 2016, and at any time in the event of specified regulatory events, convert their shares of Class B Stock into shares of Common Stock with an aggregate average market value equal to 100% of the then appraised Fair Market Value of the Class B Stock. Any exchange or conversion could occur at a time when either or both of the Common Stock and Class B Stock may be considered overvalued or undervalued. Accordingly, any such exchange or conversion may be disadvantageous to holders of Common Stock.

•

Our Board of Directors has adopted certain policies regarding inter-business transfers and accounting and tax matters, including the allocation of earnings, with respect to the Financial Services Businesses and Closed Block Business. Although the Board of Directors may change any of these policies, any such decision is subject to the Board of Directors’ general fiduciary duties, and we have agreed with investors in the Class B Stock and the insurer of the IHC debt that, in most cases, the Board of Directors may not change these policies without their consent.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(c) The following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, of its Common Stock.


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased under the Program
April 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009	251	$	25.69	—
May 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009	4,926	$	35.23	—
June 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009	587	$	37.01	—

Total	5,764	$	35.00	—	$	—

(1)

Includes shares of Common Stock withheld from participants for income tax withholding purposes whose shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested during the period. Restricted stock and restricted stock units were issued to participants pursuant to the Prudential Financial, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan that was adopted by the Company’s Board of Directors in March 2003 (as subsequently amended and restated).

288

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the Prudential Financial Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 12, 2009, the following voting occurred:

•

The shareholders elected fourteen directors to serve a one-year term until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or in each case until their successors are elected and qualified. The voting results were as follows:


Name of Director	For	Against	Abstain
Thomas J. Baltimore, Jr.	238,489,664	4,985,545	2,024,449
Frederic K. Becker	237,210,028	6,331,818	1,957,812
Gordon M. Bethune	221,171,671	22,326,545	2,001,442
Gaston Caperton	238,209,699	5,231,442	2,058,517
Gilbert F. Casellas	238,302,022	5,202,718	1,994,918
James G. Cullen	220,907,327	22,618,932	1,973,399
William H. Gray III	233,634,349	9,840,672	2,024,637
Mark B. Grier	238,382,247	5,266,100	1,851,311
Jon F. Hanson	237,162,689	6,320,037	2,016,932
Constance J. Horner	221,135,562	22,400,463	1,963,633
Karl J. Krapek	236,120,996	7,395,663	1,982,999
Christine A. Poon	238,598,766	4,945,992	1,954,900
John R. Strangfeld	236,373,802	7,379,458	1,746,398
James A. Unruh	235,768,981	7,871,254	1,859,423

•

The shareholders ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (independent auditors) for 2009. The voting results were as follows:


For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Votes
For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Votes
242,719,482	1,893,750	886,406	(0)

•

The shareholders approved a shareholder proposal recommending a shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation. The voting results were as follows:

For

Against

Abstain

Broker

Non-Votes

129,806,310

84,723,976

2,333,498

28,635,874

This matter is under consideration by the Board of Directors.

•

The shareholders rejected a shareholder proposal recommending separating the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The voting results were as follows:

For

Against

Abstain

Broker

Non-Votes

53,861,600

160,067,525

2,934,659

28,635,874

289

Item 6. Exhibits

12.1	Statement of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

31.1	Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

31.2	Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

32.1	Section 906 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

32.2	Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

101.INS

– XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

– XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

– XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

– XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

– XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

– XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

Prudential Financial, Inc. will furnish upon request a copy of any exhibit listed above upon the payment of a reasonable fee covering the expense of furnishing the copy. Requests should be directed to:

Shareholder Services

Prudential Financial, Inc.

751 Broad Street, 6th Floor

Newark, NJ 07102

290

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.

By:		/s/ RICHARD J. CARBONE
		Richard J. Carbone Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Authorized signatory and principal financial officer)

Date: August 7, 2009

291

Exhibit Index

Exhibit Number and Description

12.1 Statement of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

31.1 Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

31.2 Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

32.1 Section 906 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

32.2 Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

101.INS – XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

292