UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|X| | Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) or | | | | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) |
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | ||
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 |
Commission File Number: 001-31369
CIT GROUP INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 65-1051192 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
505 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York | 10017 | |
(Address of Registrants principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |
(212) 771-0505 | ||
(Registrants telephone number) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes |X| No |_|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. Large accelerated filer |X| Accelerated filer |_| Non-accelerated filer |_| Smaller reporting company |_|.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes |_| No |X|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes |_| No |X|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes |X| No |_|
As of July 30, 2010 there were 200,257,088 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
1
Part OneFinancial Information
June 30, | December 31, | |||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||
|
|
|||||
Assets | ||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 1,060.7 | $ | 1,289.5 | ||
Interest bearing deposits, including restricted balances of $1,179.0 at June 30, 2010 and | ||||||
$1,420.7 at December 31, 2009(1) | 9,605.7 | 8,536.4 | ||||
Trading assets at fair value derivatives | 216.1 | 44.1 | ||||
Assets held for sale(1) | 572.5 | 343.8 | ||||
Loans (see Note 3 for amounts pledged) | 28,883.2 | 34,865.8 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses | (337.8 | ) | | |||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses(1) | 28,545.4 | 34,865.8 | ||||
Operating lease equipment, net (see Note 3 for amounts pledged)(1) | 10,950.7 | 10,910.0 | ||||
Unsecured counterparty receivable | 818.7 | 1,094.5 | ||||
Goodwill | 239.4 | 239.4 | ||||
Intangible assets, net | 168.5 | 225.1 | ||||
Other assets | 2,739.1 | 2,480.5 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Assets | $ | 54,916.8 | $ | 60,029.1 | ||
|
|
|
|
|||
Liabilities | ||||||
Deposits | $ | 4,708.9 | $ | 5,218.6 | ||
Trading liabilities at fair value derivatives | 46.9 | 41.9 | ||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | 877.3 | 892.9 | ||||
Other liabilities | 2,373.3 | 2,211.3 | ||||
Long-term borrowings, including $3,396.8 and $4,629.5 contractually due within twelve months | ||||||
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively(1) | 38,276.5 | 43,263.0 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities | 46,282.9 | 51,627.7 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Stockholders Equity | ||||||
Common stock: $0.01 par value, 600,000,000 authorized | ||||||
Issued: 200,374,631 at June 30, 2010 and 200,035,561 at December 31, 2009 | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||||
Outstanding: 200,257,088 at June 30, 2010 and 200,035,561 at December 31, 2009 | ||||||
Paid-in capital | 8,419.1 | 8,398.0 | ||||
Retained earnings | 225.0 | | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (9.7 | ) | | |||
Treasury stock: 117,543 shares at June 30, 2010 at cost | (4.0 | ) | | |||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Common Stockholders Equity | 8,632.4 | 8,400.0 | ||||
Noncontrolling minority interests | 1.5 | 1.4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Equity | 8,633.9 | 8,401.4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 54,916.8 | $ | 60,029.1 | ||
|
|
|
|
(1) The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) that are consolidated by the Company. The difference between total VIE assets and liabilities represents the Companys interests in those entities, which were eliminated in consolidation. The assets of the consolidated VIEs will be used to settle the liabilities of those entities and, except for the Companys interest in the VIEs, are not available to the creditors of CIT or any affiliates of CIT.
Assets | ||||||
Interest bearing deposits, including restricted balances of $872.0 at June 30, 2010 and $655.3 at | ||||||
December 31, 2009 | $ | 872.0 | $ | 655.3 | ||
Assets held for sale | 312.9 | 6.6 | ||||
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses | 13,186.9 | 13,501.9 | ||||
Operating lease equipment, net (see Note 3 for amounts pledged) | 2,605.7 | 3,689.8 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Assets | $ | 16,977.5 | $ | 17,853.6 | ||
|
|
|
|
|||
Liabilities | ||||||
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (classified as long-term borrowings) | $ | 12,047.1 | $ | 13,662.7 | ||
|
|
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities | $ | 12,047.1 | $ | 13,662.7 | ||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Quarters Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||
|
Predecessor |
|
Predecessor | ||||||||||||
CIT 2010 | CIT 2009 | CIT 2010 | CIT 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Interest income | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 987.2 | $ | 606.5 | $ | 2,030.7 | $ | 1,235.1 | |||||||
Interest and dividends on investments | 6.3 | 8.0 | 11.8 | 19.0 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest income | 993.5 | 614.5 | 2,042.5 | 1,254.1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest expense | |||||||||||||||
Interest on long-term borrowings | (784.7 | ) | (596.2 | ) | (1,592.4 | ) | (1,228.9 | ) | |||||||
Interest on deposits | (28.9 | ) | (37.4 | ) | (59.0 | ) | (61.8 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Interest expense | (813.6 | ) | (633.6 | ) | (1,651.4 | ) | (1,290.7 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net interest revenue | 179.9 | (19.1 | ) | 391.1 | (36.6 | ) | |||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (260.7 | ) | (588.5 | ) | (447.3 | ) | (1,123.9 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net interest revenue, after credit provision | (80.8 | ) | (607.6 | ) | (56.2 | ) | (1,160.5 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Other income | |||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 419.7 | 473.5 | 837.9 | 948.7 | |||||||||||
Other | 330.6 | (198.8 | ) | 462.8 | (10.8 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total other income | 750.3 | 274.7 | 1,300.7 | 937.9 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total revenue, net of interest expense and credit | |||||||||||||||
provision | 669.5 | (332.9 | ) | 1,244.5 | (222.6 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Other expenses | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | (179.0 | ) | (286.6 | ) | (352.5 | ) | (568.6 | ) | |||||||
Operating expenses | (277.0 | ) | (293.9 | ) | (538.9 | ) | (456.5 | ) | |||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges | | (692.4 | ) | | (692.4 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total other expenses | (456.0 | ) | (1,272.9 | ) | (891.4 | ) | (1,717.5 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | 213.5 | (1,605.8 | ) | 353.1 | (1,940.1 | ) | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes | (71.1 | ) | (12.7 | ) | (113.6 | ) | (20.7 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||
interests and preferred stock dividends | 142.4 | (1,618.5 | ) | 239.5 | (1,960.8 | ) | |||||||||
Loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests, | |||||||||||||||
after tax | (0.3 | ) | 0.7 | (0.1 | ) | 0.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) before preferred stock dividends | 142.1 | (1,617.8 | ) | 239.4 | (1,960.6 | ) | |||||||||
Preferred stock dividends | | (61.6 | ) | | (122.0 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to | |||||||||||||||
common stockholders | $ | 142.1 | $ | (1,679.4 | ) | $ | 239.4 | $ | (2,082.6 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.71 | $ | (4.30 | ) | $ | 1.20 | $ | (5.34 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share | $ | 0.71 | $ | (4.30 | ) | $ | 1.19 | $ | (5.34 | ) | |||||
Average number of shares basic (thousands) | 200,075 | 390,535 | 200,057 | 389,741 | |||||||||||
Average number of shares diluted (thousands) | 200,644 | 390,535 | 200,359 | 389,741 | |||||||||||
Cash dividends per common share | | | | 0.02 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Common Stock |
Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income / (Loss) |
Treasury Stock |
Noncontrolling Interest in Subsidiaries |
Total Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | $ | 2.0 |
$
|
8,398.0 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1.4 | $ | 8,401.4 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of new accounting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
pronouncement | (14.4 | ) | (14.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 239.4 | 0.1 | 239.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustments | (11.4 | ) | (11.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair values of derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
qualifying as cash flow hedges | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on available for sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
equity investments, net | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | 229.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock and stock option | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
expenses | 21.1 | (4.0 | ) | 17.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
June 30, 2010 | $ | 2.0 |
$
|
8,419.1 | $ | 225.0 | $ | (9.7 | ) | $ | (4.0 | ) | $ | 1.5 | $ | 8,633.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||
CIT 2010 |
Predecessor CIT 2009 |
|||||||
Cash Flows From Operations | ||||||||
Net income (loss) before preferred stock dividends | $ | 239.4 | $ | (1,960.6 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operations: | ||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 447.3 | 1,123.9 | ||||||
Net depreciation, amortization and (accretion) | (300.8 | ) | 695.7 | |||||
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges | | 692.4 | ||||||
Net (gains) / losses on equipment, receivable and investment sales | (187.6 | ) | 171.9 | |||||
Valuation allowance for assets held for sale | | 38.0 | ||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes | 69.6 | 33.4 | ||||||
Decrease in finance receivables held for sale | 5.6 | 11.3 | ||||||
Warrant fair value adjustment | | (70.6 | ) | |||||
Gain on debt and debt-related derivative extinguishments | | (139.4 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets | (151.3 | ) | 209.3 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities and payables | 55.9 | 69.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net cash flows provided by operations | 178.1 | 875.1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||
Loans extended and purchased | (9,100.5 | ) | (13,534.3 | ) | ||||
Principal collections of loans and investments | 14,029.2 | 15,724.0 | ||||||
Proceeds from asset and receivable sales | 2,415.6 | 1,515.2 | ||||||
Purchases of assets to be leased and other equipment | (616.6 | ) | (1,057.4 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in short-term factoring receivables | 395.1 | 549.4 | ||||||
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operation | | 44.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net cash flows provided by investing activities | 7,122.8 | 3,241.1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of term debt | 2,156.1 | 4,145.4 | ||||||
Repayments of term debt | (7,887.1 | ) | (13,802.7 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits | (490.8 | ) | 2,751.9 | |||||
Net repayments of non-recourse leveraged lease debt | (14.3 | ) | (19.7 | ) | ||||
Collection of security deposits and maintenance funds | 346.6 | 516.1 | ||||||
Repayment of security deposits and maintenance funds | (329.2 | ) | (459.3 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid | | (91.3 | ) | |||||
Other | | (56.5 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net cash flows used in financing activities | (6,218.7 | ) | (7,016.1 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Increase (decrease) in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents | 1,082.2 | (2,899.9 | ) | |||||
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 8,405.2 | 6,263.3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 9,487.4 | $ | 3,363.4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Supplementary Cash Flow Disclosure | ||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 1,468.3 | $ | 1,287.7 | ||||
Federal, foreign, state and local income taxes paid (refunded), net | $ | 11.1 | $ | (67.9 | ) | |||
Supplementary Non Cash Flow Disclosure | ||||||||
Net transfer of finance receivables from held for investment to held for sale | $ | 1,597.8 | $ | 412.4 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
NOTE 1 BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include financial information related to CIT Group Inc. and its majority owned subsidiaries, including CIT Bank (collectively, CIT or the Company), and those variable interest entities (VIEs) where the Company is primary beneficiary. CIT is a bank holding company and provides commercial financing and leasing products and other services to small and middle market companies in a wide variety of industries.
On November 1, 2009, CIT Group Inc. (Predecessor CIT) and CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware LLC (Delaware Funding and together with Predecessor CIT, the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code). As a result of the Debtors emergence from bankruptcy and implementation of the Modified Second Amended Prepackaged Reorganization Plan of Debtors (the Plan) on December 10, 2009 (the Emergence Date), CIT Group Inc. (Successor CIT) became a new reporting entity for financial reporting purposes, with a new basis in identifiable assets and liabilities assumed, a new capital structure and no retained earnings or accumulated losses. Predecessor CITs Consolidated Statements of Operation for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 and Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 are not comparable to the consolidated financial statements for the respective 2010 periods and are presented separately from Successor CIT. See the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (Form 10-K), Note 1 and Note 2 for additional Fresh Start Accounting (FSA) and reorganization information.
The terms CIT and Company, when used with respect to periods commencing after emergence from bankruptcy, are references to Successor CIT and when used with respect to periods prior to emergence, are references to Predecessor CIT. These references include subsidiaries of Successor CIT or Predecessor CIT, unless otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise.
The consolidated financial statements include effects of adopting FSA upon emergence from bankruptcy, as required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). In applying FSA, the Company designated December 31, 2009 as a convenience date (the Convenience Date) for recording fair value adjustments to assets, liabilities and equity. Accretion and amortization of certain FSA adjustments are included in the Statement of Operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010.
These consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, do not include all information and note disclosures required by GAAP. The financial statements in this Form 10-Q have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.), but in the opinion of management include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of CITs financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with GAAP. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Form 10-K.
On January 1, 2010, the Company implemented new consolidation accounting guidance related to VIEs. The new guidance eliminated the concept of qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs) that were previously exempt from consolidation, and introduced a new framework for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. Under the new guidance, the primary beneficiary is the party that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance; and (2) through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Consolidation eliminated the retained interest and increased Cash ($105 million), Loans ($821 million), Allowance for loan losses ($40 million), Long-term borrowings ($738 million), and Other liabilities ($17 million) as of January 1, 2010. Equity decreased by approximately $14 million as of January 1, 2010.
All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Assets held in an agency or fiduciary capacity are not included in the consolidated financial statements. The Company accounts for investments in companies for which it owns a voting interest of 20 percent to 50 percent and for which it has an ability to exercise significant influence over operations and financial decisions using the equity method of accounting. These investments are included in Other Assets and the Companys proportionate share of net income or loss is included in Other Income.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Some of the more significant estimates include: fresh start accounting fair values; valuation of deferred tax assets; lease residual values and depreciation of operating lease equipment; and allowance for loan losses. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Additionally, where applicable, policies conform to accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities.
6
On July 16, 2009, the FDIC and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (the UDFI) each issued cease and desist orders to CIT Bank (together, the Orders). The Orders were in connection with the diminished liquidity of Predecessor CIT. CIT Bank, without admitting or denying any allegations made by the FDIC and UDFI, consented and agreed to the issuances of the Orders.
On August 12, 2009, CIT entered into a Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Company continues to provide required periodic reports relating to: corporate governance, credit risk management, capital, liquidity and funds management, business trends, as appropriate, and the allowance for loan losses methodology.
Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update 2010-01, Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash. These amendments clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders, which allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate, is considered a share issuance, will be reflected in earnings per share prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). These amendments were effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. Adoption of these amendments did not materially impact the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
In January 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820). This update enhances disclosures about (1) different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) valuation techniques and inputs used, (3) transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3, and (4) activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Except for the detailed Level 3 rollforward disclosures, this guidance was adopted and did not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition and results of operations. Disclosure of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Adoption of this amendment will not materially impact the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
In March 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-11, Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives (Topic 815), which clarifies that the only exception to the requirement that an embedded credit derivative feature should be assessed for potential bifurcation and separate accounting applies to the transfer of credit risk in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another. In addition, this update provides guidance for determining whether other credit derivative features qualify for the scope exception. The amendments in this update are effective at the beginning of the first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entitys first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this update. Adoption of this update will not materially impact the Companys financial condition and results of operation.
In April 2010, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset (Topic 310) which provides guidance concerning whether an individual loan that is part of a pool of loans accounted for as a single asset should be removed from the pool upon modifications that would otherwise qualify as a troubled debt restructuring. The guidance in this update is effective (and applied prospectively) for any modification of a loan accounted for within a pool occurring in interim or annual periods beginning on or after July 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. Upon adoption, a one-time election may be made to terminate prospectively (on a pool-by-pool basis) accounting for loans as a pool; note, though, that such an election does not preclude accounting for future loan acquisitions as a pooled unit of accounting. The adoption of this update will not materially impact the Companys financial condition and results of operations.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which provides guidance that will require enhanced disclosures surrounding the credit characteristics of the Companys loan portfolio. Under the new guidance, the Company will be required to disclose its accounting policies, the methods it uses to determine the components of the allowance for credit losses, and qualitative and quantitative information about the credit risk inherent in the loan portfolio, including additional information on certain types of loan modifications. For the Company, the new disclosures are effective for the 2010 Annual Report. The new disclosures on the rollforward of the allowance for credit losses and the new disclosures about troubled debt modifications are effective for the first quarter 2011 Form 10-Q. The adoption of this guidance will only affect CITs disclosures of loans and not its financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 2 LOANS AND RESERVE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The following table presents loans, direct financing leases and leveraged leases held for investment, by segment based on obligor location:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic | Foreign | Total | Domestic | Foreign | Total | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 7,558.2 | $ | 2,287.5 | $ | 9,845.7 | $ | 9,611.2 | $ | 2,539.1 | $ | 12,150.3 | |||||
Transportation Finance | 1,349.3 | 322.0 | 1,671.3 | 1,528.7 | 324.3 | 1,853.0 | |||||||||||
Trade Finance | 2,259.5 | 255.1 | 2,514.6 | 2,602.6 | 388.4 | 2,991.0 | |||||||||||
Vendor Finance | 3,564.4 | 2,501.7 | 6,066.1 | 4,363.8 | 3,824.0 | 8,187.8 | |||||||||||
Consumer | 8,766.2 | 19.3 | 8,785.5 | 9,664.3 | 19.4 | 9,683.7 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total | $ | 23,497.6 | $ | 5,385.6 | $ | 28,883.2 | $ | 27,770.6 | $ | 7,095.2 | $ | 34,865.8 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
The following table contains information on finance receivables evaluated for impairment and the related reserve for credit losses. The Company excludes homogenous loans such as consumer loans, small-ticket loans and lease receivables, short-term and factoring customer finance receivables from receivables evaluated for impairment. For purposes of this presentation, finance receivables that were impaired at the Convenience Date and impaired loans identified in 2010 are presented separately below. The Company is applying the income recognition and disclosure guidance in ASC 310-30-5 (Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality) to loans considered impaired in FSA. The balance of loans under the guidance of ASC 310-30-5 was $1,231.7 million at June 30, 2010.
Total
|
2010 Impaired Loans |
Impaired Loans Identified in FSA (December 31, 2009 and prior) |
||||||
Finance receivables considered for impairment | $ | 1,846.7 | $ | 794.3 | $ | 1,052.4 | ||
Impaired finance receivables with specific allowance | 180.7 | 103.5 | 77.2 | |||||
Specific allowance for impaired receivables | 36.5 | 16.0 | 20.5 | |||||
Impaired finance receivables with no specific allowance | 1,666.0 | 690.8 | 975.2 | |||||
Average investment in impaired finance receivables | 1,700.0 | 402.3 | 1,297.7 |
The Companys policy is to review finance receivables greater than $500 thousand placed on non-accrual status for impairment. As a result, the amounts in the table above considered for impairment exclude small-ticket leasing accounts and other homogeneous pools of loans that are included in reported non-accrual balances.
The following table sets forth non-performing assets which reflect both loans on non-accrual (primarily loans ninety days or more delinquent) and assets received in satisfaction of loans (repossessed assets).
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||
|
|
||||
Non-accrual loans | $ | 2,052.4 | $ | 1,574.4 | |
Assets received in satisfaction of loans | 42.8 | 36.3 | |||
|
|
|
|
||
Total non-performing assets | $ | 2,095.2 | $ | 1,610.7 | |
|
|
|
|
||
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more(1) | $ |
437.7
|
$ |
570.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Balance includes $428.2 million and $480.7 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, of government-guaranteed loans.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were $7.0 million and $14.8 million, respectively, of commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing loans whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings.
Upon implementation of FSA, the Company assigned non-accretable discount to both non-accrual loans and certain higher risk performing accounts. Effective as of April 1, 2010, the Company corrected the accounting for the performing loans in the Corporate Finance and Transportation Finance segments to account for and report the related fresh start discount in a manner consistent with the Companys performing loans in these segments. As a result, the following adjustments were recorded in the second quarter related to the three months ended March 31, 2010:
$70.8 million of non-accretable discount was reclassified to accretable discount; and
$10.9 million of discount accretion on the transferred accretable discount was recorded in interest income.
Management has concluded that the adjustments were not individually or in the aggregate material to the consolidated financial statements, as of and for the periods ended June 30, 2010, or to any of the preceding periods as reported.
8
At June 30, 2010, the remaining principal balance of finance receivables held at the time of FSA that have shown evidence of credit deterioration since origination was $2,392.3 million. The following table presents the changes to the accretable discount since December 31, 2009.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
||||||
Accretable discount, beginning of period | $ | 332.0 | $ | 454.8 | |||
Accretion | (9.9 | ) | (40.4 | ) | |||
Disposals/transfers | (99.1 | ) | (191.4 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accretable discount, end of period | $ | 223.0 | $ | 223.0 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents changes in allowance for credit losses:
Quarters Ended June 30,
|
Six Months
Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||
CIT 2010 |
Predecessor
CIT 2009 |
CIT 2010 |
Predecessor
CIT 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 180.8 | $ | 1,316.3 | $ | | $ | 1,096.2 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 260.7 | 588.5 | 447.3 | 1,123.9 | |||||||||||||||
Reserve change relating to new accounting pronouncement |
| | 39.7 | | |||||||||||||||
Reserve changes relating to sales, foreign currency translation, other |
2.6 | (10.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net additions to the reserve for credit losses | 263.3 | 578.0 | 486.4 | 1,111.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Charged-off finance receivables | (113.3 | ) | (375.8 | ) | (157.7 | ) | (703.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Recoveries(1) | 7.0 | 19.9 | 9.1 | 34.0 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net charge-offs | (106.3 | ) | (355.9 | ) | (148.6 | ) | (669.0 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reserve balance end of period | $ | 337.8 | $ | 1,538.4 | $ | 337.8 | $ | 1,538.4 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Recoveries for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively do not include $113.3 million and $157.1 million of recoveries on accounts that were charged-off pre-FSA, which are included in Other Income. |
NOTE 3 LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
The following table presents outstanding long-term borrowings:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
CIT Group Inc. | Subsidiaries | Total | Total | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Secured borrowings | $ | | $ | 12,403.1 | $ | 12,403.1 | $ | 14,346.5 | |||
Secured credit facility and expansion credit facility | 301.0 | 4,295.9 | 4,596.9 | 7,716.6 | |||||||
Senior unsecured notes | 85.8 | 113.8 | 199.6 | 268.1 | |||||||
Series A Notes | 18,882.2 | | 18,882.2 | 18,733.6 | |||||||
Series B Notes | | 2,194.7 | 2,194.7 | 2,198.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 19,269.0 | $ | 19,007.5 | $ | 38,276.5 | $ | 43,263.0 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Secured Borrowings
Set forth below are borrowings and pledged assets primarily owned by consolidated special purpose entities. Creditors of these special purpose entities received ownership and/or security interests in the assets. These special purpose entities are intended to be bankruptcy remote so that such assets are not available to creditors of CIT or any affiliates of CIT. These transactions do not meet accounting requirements for sales treatment and are recorded as secured borrowings. Except as otherwise noted, pledged assets listed below are not included in the collateral available to lenders under the Credit Facility or Expansion Credit Facility described below.
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
Secured Borrowing |
Assets Pledged |
Secured Borrowing |
Assets Pledged |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Education trusts and conduits (student loans) | $ | 4,787.8 | $ | 5,893.2 | $ | 5,864.3 | $ | 6,864.7 | |||
Goldman Sachs International (GSI) TRS(1) | 2,122.0 | 2,950.8 | 2,552.7 | 3,429.6 | |||||||
Vendor Finance(2) | 664.0 | 869.6 | 1,120.7 | 1,589.4 | |||||||
Equipment lease securitizations (Vendor) | 1,078.4 | 1,132.1 | 706.0 | 762.2 | |||||||
Trade Finance | 550.0 | 1,634.5 | | | |||||||
Canadian equipment receivables financing | 534.8 | 578.7 | 543.0 | 557.6 | |||||||
Corporate Finance (energy project finance) | 286.9 | 312.8 | 288.9 | 305.0 | |||||||
Corporate Finance (SBL)(2) | 259.9 | 297.0 | | | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Subtotal finance receivables | 10,283.8 | 13,668.7 | 11,075.6 | 13,508.5 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
ECA financing (Aero)(3) | 1,057.5 | 1,204.1 | 1,097.4 | 1,212.2 | |||||||
Transportation Finance Rail | 151.4 | 147.6 | 907.4 | 1,276.7 | |||||||
GSI TRS (Aero) | 551.9 | 1,141.7 | 582.2 | 1,154.3 | |||||||
Other structures | 113.0 | 135.3 | 61.2 | 69.8 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Subtotal Equipment under operating leases | 1,873.8 | 2,628.7 | 2,648.2 | 3,713.0 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Vendor Finance(4) | 169.2 | 202.8 | 469.8 | 903.3 | |||||||
FHLB borrowings (CIT Bank)(5) | 76.3 | 132.1 | 152.9 | 150.8 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 12,403.1 | $ | 16,632.3 | $ | 14,346.5 | $ | 18,275.6 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) June 30, 2010 financing is secured by $2.1 billion corporate finance receivables, $0.6 billion student loans, and $0.2 billion small business lending loans.
(2) Includes repurchase of assets previously sold or securitized and the associated secured debt.
(3) Secured aircraft financing facility for the purchase of specified Airbus aircraft.
(4) International facilities collateralized by local assets.
(5) Collateralized with Government Debentures and Certificates of Deposit.
Secured Credit Facility and Expansion Credit Facility
The Secured Credit Facility and Expansion Credit Facility (the First Lien Facilities) are secured by a first lien on substantially all U.S. assets that are not pledged to secure the borrowings of special purpose entities as described above under Secured Borrowings, 65% of the voting and 100% of the non-voting stock of first-tier foreign subsidiaries, 100% of the stock of CIT Aerospace International (except one nominee share) and between 49% and 65% of certain other non-U.S., non-regulated subsidiaries. The First Lien Facilities are subject to a fair value collateral coverage covenant (based on accounting valuation methodology) of 2.5x the outstanding loan balance tested quarterly and upon the financing, disposition or release of certain collateral. The agreement evidencing the First Lien Facilities includes certain additional terms, including a cash sweep that under certain circumstances will accelerate repayment of the First Lien Facilities. See the Companys Form 10-K, Note 9 Long-term Borrowings for a description of these terms. See Note 13 Subsequent Event for refinancing of the First Lien Facilities.
Series A and B Notes
The Series A Notes and Series B Notes (Second Lien Notes) are secured by second-priority security interests in substantially all the assets securing the First Lien Facilities. The Series B Notes are further secured by Delaware Fundings pledge of inter-company notes issued by CIT Financial Ltd., which are the primary assets of Delaware Funding.
10
The Second Lien Notes Indentures likewise limit the ability of the Company, Delaware Funding and the Companys restricted subsidiaries to make certain payments or investments, incur indebtedness (including guarantees), issue preferred stock, incur liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, pay dividends, sell assets, and enter into transactions with affiliates.
Further information on Long-term Borrowings can be found in the Companys 2009 Form 10-K.
NOTE 4 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
See the Companys Form 10-K Note 10 for a description of its derivative transaction policies.
Due to the reorganization (see Note 1) none of the Companys derivatives entered into prior to December 31, 2009 achieve hedge accounting. The Company continues reassessing hedge requirements and reestablishing counterparty relationships to facilitate placement of hedges where economically appropriate. New derivative instruments are cash collateralized.
The following table presents fair values and notional values of derivative financial instruments:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Hedges | Notional Amount |
Asset Fair Value |
Liability Fair Value |
Notional Amount |
Asset Fair Value |
Liability Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
Cross currency swaps | $ | 329.0 | $ | 9.0 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange cash flow hedges | 73.7 | 3.9 | | | | | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange net investment hedges | 1,020.4 | 21.4 | (0.1 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total Qualifying Hedges | $ | 1,423.1 | $ | 34.3 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Non-Qualifying Hedges | |||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency swaps | $ | 1,735.2 | $ | 108.5 | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | 646.7 | $ | | $ | (8.8 | ) | |||||
Interest rate swaps | 1,273.6 | 7.9 | (41.0 | ) | 3,165.9 | 23.4 | (25.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Written options | 788.6 | | | 1,009.8 | | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Purchased options | 1,508.2 | 6.7 | | 1,524.1 | 18.4 | | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts | 1,877.4 | 93.0 | (4.0 | ) | 1,055.1 | 2.3 | (7.3 | ) | |||||||||||
TRS | 261.2 | | | 107.9 | | | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total Non-qualifying Hedges | $ | 7,444.2 | $ | 216.1 | $ | (46.9 | ) | $ | 7,509.5 | $ | 44.1 | $ | (41.9 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A financing facility with Goldman Sachs International (GSI) is structured as a total return swap (TRS). Amounts available for advances are accounted for as a derivative. Estimated fair value is based on a hypothetical transfer value, considering current market conditions and other factors. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value was not significant.
The following table presents the impact of derivatives on the statement of operations:
Quarters Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
CIT 2010 |
Predecessor CIT 2009 |
CIT 2010 |
Predecessor CIT 2009 |
|||||||||||||||
Derivative Instruments | Gain / (Loss) Recognized | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Qualifying Hedges | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps cash flow | ||||||||||||||||||
hedges | Other income | $ | | $ | 3.9 | $ | | $ | 3.9 | |||||||||
Interest rate swaps fair value | ||||||||||||||||||
hedges | Other income | | 14.3 | | 13.3 | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward | ||||||||||||||||||
exchange cash flow hedges | Other income | 9.3 | | 9.3 | | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Qualifying Hedges | $ | 9.3 | $ | 18.2 | $ | 9.3 | $ | 17.2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non Qualifying Hedges | ||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency swaps | Other income | $ | 103.8 | $ | (32.5 | ) | $ | 113.1 | $ | (41.2 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swaps | Other income | (30.7 | ) | 29.7 | (50.1 | ) | 31.1 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency forward | ||||||||||||||||||
exchange contracts | Other income | 94.7 | (4.9 | ) | 164.8 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Warrants | Other income | | (25.2 | ) | | 70.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Non-qualifying Hedges | $ | 167.8 | $ | (32.9 | ) | $ | 227.8 | $ | 61.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The gains and (losses) on qualifying and non-qualifying hedges are recorded in other Income and are partially offset by the impact of foreign currency changes.
NOTE 5 FAIR VALUE
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The fair value of financial instruments required to be valued on a recurring basis based on priority ranking of valuation inputs are presented in the following tables:
June 30, 2010 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Trading assets at fair value derivatives | $ | 216.1 | $ | | $ | 216.1 | $ | | ||||||
Derivative counterparty assets at fair value | 34.3 | | 34.3 | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Assets | $ | 250.4 | $ | | $ | 250.4 | $ | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Trading liabilities at fair value derivatives | $ | (46.9 | ) | $ | | $ | (46.3 | ) | $ | (0.6 | ) | |||
Derivative counterparty liabilities at fair value | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Liabilities | $ | (47.0 | ) | $ | | $ | (46.4 | ) | $ | (0.6 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Retained interests securitizations | $ | 139.7 | $ | | $ | | $ | 139.7 | ||||||
Trading assets derivatives | 44.1 | | 44.1 | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Assets | $ | 183.8 | $ | | $ | 44.1 | $ | 139.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Trading liabilities derivatives | $ | (41.9 | ) | $ | | $ | (40.4 | ) | $ | (1.5 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Gains and Losses
The tables below set forth changes in Level 3 estimated fair value of financial instruments:
CIT | Total
|
Retained Interests in Securitizations |
Derivatives
|
||||||||
March 31, 2010 | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | | $ | (0.9 | ) | |||
Gains or (losses) realized/unrealized | |||||||||||
Included in Other income | 0.3 | | 0.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
June 30, 2010 | $ | (0.6 | ) | $ | | $ | (0.6 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
December 31, 2009 | $ | 138.2 | $ | 139.7 | $ | (1.5 | ) | ||||
Gains or (losses) realized/unrealized | |||||||||||
Included in Other income | 0.9 | | 0.9 | ||||||||
Included in Other comprehensive income | | | | ||||||||
Other (retained interest)(1) | (139.7 | ) | (139.7 | ) | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
June 30, 2010 | $ | (0.6 | ) | $ | | $ | (0.6 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Predecessor CIT | |||||||||||
March 31, 2009 | $ | 194.5 | $ | 192.0 | $ | 2.5 | |||||
Gains or (losses) realized/unrealized | |||||||||||
Included in Other income | (22.8 | ) | 1.0 | (23.8 | ) | ||||||
Included in Other comprehensive income | 7.0 | 1.3 | 5.7 | ||||||||
Other (retained interest) | (24.8 | ) | (24.8 | ) | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
June 30, 2009 | $ | 153.9 | $ | 169.5 | $ | (15.6 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
December 31, 2008 | $ | 224.6 | $ | 229.4 | $ | (4.8 | ) | ||||
Gains or (losses) realized/unrealized | |||||||||||
Included in Other income | (40.3 | ) | (12.9 | ) | (27.4 | ) | |||||
Included in Other comprehensive income | 14.9 | (1.7 | ) | 16.6 | |||||||
Other (retained interest) | (45.3 | ) | (45.3 | ) | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
June 30, 2009 | $ | 153.9 | $ | 169.5 | $ | (15.6 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The change in the retained interest in 2010 is attributed to a new accounting pronouncement effective January 1, 2010.
12
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis
The following tables present financial instruments for which a non-recurring change in fair value has been recorded:
Total Net Losses(1) |
|||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | $ | 103.3 | $ | | $ | | $ | 103.3 | $ | (5.5 | ) | ||||
Impaired loans | 36.6 | | | 36.6 | (16.5 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total | $ | 139.9 | $ | | $ | | $ | 139.9 | $ | (22.0 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Reflects pretax amounts recorded in provision for loan losses (Impaired loans) in the Statements of Operation for declines in fair values.
See Form 10-K, Note 10, for complete listing of non-recurring changes in fair value as of December 31, 2009.
The carrying and estimated fair values of financial instruments presented below exclude leases and certain other assets, which are not required for disclosure:
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||
Trading assets derivatives | $ | 216.1 | $ | 216.1 | $ | 44.1 | $ | 44.1 | ||||||||
Derivative counterparty assets at fair value (component of Other | ||||||||||||||||
Assets) | 34.3 | 34.3 | | | ||||||||||||
Investments retained interest in securitizations (component of | ||||||||||||||||
Other Assets) | | | 139.7 | 139.7 | ||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | 572.5 | 572.5 | 343.8 | 343.8 | ||||||||||||
Loans (excluding leases) | 22,246.7 | 22,759.7 | 27,291.3 | 27,291.3 | ||||||||||||
Other assets and unsecured counterparty receivable (1) | 2,090.2 | 2,090.2 | 2,336.2 | 2,336.2 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits (2) | $ | (4,736.6 | ) | $ | (4,723.4 | ) | $ | (5,253.1 | ) | $ | (5,253.1 | ) | ||||
Trading liabilities derivatives | (46.9 | ) | (46.9 | ) | (41.9 | ) | (41.9 | ) | ||||||||
Derivative counterparty liabilities at fair value | (0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Long-term borrowings (2) | (38,546.8 | ) | (38,900.1 | ) | (43,441.5 | ) | (43,441.5 | ) | ||||||||
Other liabilities (3) | (1,743.9 | ) | (1,743.9 | ) | (1,701.7 | ) | (1,701.7 | ) |
(1) Other assets subject to fair value disclosure include accrued interest receivable, certain investment securities, servicing assets and miscellaneous other assets. The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable approximates fair value.
(2) Deposits and long-term borrowings include accrued interest
(3) Other liabilities have a fair value that approximates carrying value due to the short term duration.
13
Assumptions used in valuing financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 are the same as disclosed in Note 12 of Form 10-K.
The net carrying value of lease finance receivables not subject to fair value disclosure totaled $5.4 billion at June 30, 2010.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
CITs tax provision of $71.1 million for the quarter and $113.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, equated to 33.3% and 32.2% effective tax rates, respectively, compared with (0.8%) and (1.1%) for the respective 2009 periods. The effective tax rate is primarily reflective of taxes on certain international operations and valuation allowances recorded against U.S. losses.
Included in the second quarter and year to date 2010 tax provisions are $14.3 million and $23.6 million of tax expense related to valuation allowances recorded against international deferred tax assets and changes in liabilities for uncertain tax positions. The Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the total unrecognized tax benefits will decrease due to the settlement of audits and the expiration of statute of limitations prior to June 30, 2011 in the range of $5-20 million.
As of December 31, 2009, we had net operating losses (NOLs) of $7.6 billion prior to cancellation of indebtedness income. After cancellation of indebtedness income, we estimate that we currently have remaining NOL carryforwards of $2.6 billion, which expire from 2027 through 2029. FSA adjustments are excluded from the calculation of U.S. taxable income. Excluding FSA adjustments, second quarter 2010 U.S. results were a loss of approximately $625 million ($1 billion year to date), which will increase, net of book / tax differences, the Companys U.S. NOL carryforwards. These losses would not be subject to Section 382 limitations.
In 2009, CITs reorganization constituted an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code, which places an annual dollar limit on the use of NOL carry forwards. There are two relief provisions for limitations on NOL usage in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Under one relief provision, the Company avoids any limitation on our use of NOL carry forwards, but the amount of the NOL is calculated without taking into account deductions for certain interest expense with respect to notes that were exchanged for equity, effectively reducing the Companys NOL. In addition, if the Company undergoes an ownership change within two years of the reorganization, our remaining NOL carry forwards, if any, would be entirely eliminated. To reduce this risk, the Companys Certificate of Incorporation was amended to include restrictions on trading of the Companys Common Stock. Under the second relief provision, the calculation of the annual limitation of usage of NOLs is based on the value of equity immediately after any ownership change. If the Company elects this second provision, the Company estimates its NOL usage will be limited to $230 million per annum; however, the requirement to eliminate unused NOL carry forwards upon a change of ownership within two years of the reorganization would not apply. The Company has not yet made its determination of which relief provision it will select. See the Companys 10-K for December 31, 2009 for further information regarding the two relief provisions and the effects of the 2009 reorganization.
NOTE 7 STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Total comprehensive income was $93.5 million for the June 30, 2010 quarter and $229.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, versus comprehensive losses of $1.5 billion and $1.9 billion in the comparable periods in the prior year. The following table details the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax:
June 30, 2010 | |||
|
|||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | $ | (11.4 | ) |
Unrealized gain on available for sale equity investments, net | 2.0 | ||
Changes in fair values of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges | (0.1 | ) | |
Minimum pension liability adjustment | (0.2 | ) | |
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (9.7 | ) |
|
|
|
The change in the foreign currency translation adjustments reflects the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, net of hedges, against foreign currencies, primarily the Euro and Swedish krona, partially offset by weakness against the Canadian dollar.
NOTE 8 REGULATORY CAPITAL
The Company and CIT Bank are each subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). See Form 10-K for details on requirements.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require that the Company and CIT Bank each maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets, subject to any agreement with regulators to maintain higher capital levels. In connection with becoming a bank holding company in December 2008, the Company committed to a minimum level of total risk based capital of 13%. In connection with CIT Banks conversion to a Utah state bank in December 2008, CIT Bank committed to maintaining for three years a leverage ratio of at least 15%.
14
The calculation of the Companys regulatory capital ratios are subject to review and consultation with the Federal Reserve Bank, which may result in refinements to amounts reported at June 30, 2010.
CIT
|
CIT Bank
|
||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009(1) |
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | |||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity | $ | 8,632.4 | $ | 8,400.0 | $ | 1,720.6 | $ | 1,590.1 | |||||||
Items in Accumulated other comprehensive | |||||||||||||||
income excluded from Tier 1 Capital | (1.7 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Adjusted total equity | 8,630.7 | 8,400.0 | 1,720.4 | 1,590.1 | |||||||||||
Less: Goodwill | (239.4 | ) | (239.4 | ) | | | |||||||||
Disallowed intangible assets | (168.5 | ) | (225.1 | ) | | | |||||||||
Investment in certain subsidiaries | | (2.8 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Other Tier 1 components(2) | (88.5 | ) | (98.5 | ) | (147.6 | ) | (196.9 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | 8,134.3 | 7,834.2 | 1,572.8 | 1,393.2 | |||||||||||
Tier 2 Capital | |||||||||||||||
Qualifying reserve for credit losses | 337.8 | | 4.0 | | |||||||||||
Other Tier 2 components(3) | 1.0 | | 0.1 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total qualifying capital | $ | 8,473.1 | $ | 7,834.2 | $ | 1,576.9 | $ | 1,393.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Risk-weighted assets | $ | 46,624.3 | $ | 54,352.7 | $ | 2,660.4 | $ | 3,200.5 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Total Capital (to risk weighted assets): | |||||||||||
Actual | 18.2 | % | 14.4 | % | 59.3 | % | 43.5 | % | |||
Required Ratio for Capital Adequacy Purposes | 13.0 | %(4) | 13.0 | %(4) | 8.0 | % | 8.0 | % | |||
Tier 1 Capital (to risk weighted assets): | |||||||||||
Actual | 17.4 | % | 14.4 | % | 59.1 | % | 43.5 | % | |||
Required Ratio for Capital Adequacy Purposes | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | |||
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets) (Leverage Ratio): | |||||||||||
Actual | 14.6 | % | 11.3 | % | 20.6 | % | 15.4 | % | |||
Required Ratio for Capital Adequacy Purposes | 4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | 15.0 | %(4) | 15.0 | %(4) |
(1) Amounts reclassified to conform to the current quarters presentation.
(2) Includes the portion of net deferred tax assets that does not qualify for inclusion in Tier 1 capital based on the capital guidelines and the Tier 1 capital charge for nonfinancial equity investments.
(3) Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.
(4) The Company has committed to maintaining capital ratios above regulatory minimum levels.
15
NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS
The table below summarizes credit-related commitments, as well as purchase and funding commitments:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
Due to Expire
|
|||||||||||
Within One Year |
After One Year |
Total Outstanding |
Total Outstanding |
||||||||
Financing Commitments | |||||||||||
Financing and leasing assets | $ | 505.2 | $ | 2,358.9 | $ |
2,864.1
|
$ | 3,735.8 | |||
Vendor receivables | | | | 889.1 | |||||||
Letters of credit and acceptances | |||||||||||
Standby letters of credit | 70.3 | 188.2 | 258.5 | 539.2 | |||||||
Other letters of credit | 132.0 | 0.6 | 132.6 | 139.2 | |||||||
Guarantees and acceptances | 1,232.6 | 8.4 | 1,241.0 | 1,396.6 | |||||||
Purchase and Funding Commitments | |||||||||||
Aerospace and other manufacturer purchase commitments | 524.5 | 3,824.5 | 4,349.0 | 4,777.3 | |||||||
Other | |||||||||||
Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits | 5.0 | 53.9 | 58.9 | 50.1 |
Financing Commitments
Financing commitments, referred to as loan commitments, or lines of credit, are agreements to lend to customers, subject to the customers compliance with contractual obligations. Given that these commitments are not typically fully drawn, may expire unused or be reduced or cancelled at the customers request and require the customer to be in compliance with certain conditions, the total commitment amount does not necessarily reflect actual future cash flow requirements. Financing commitments shown above exclude $1.5 billion of commitments not available for draw due to requirements for asset / collateral availability or covenant conditions at June 30, 2010.
At June 30, 2010, substantially all financing commitments were senior facilities, with approximately 49% secured by equipment or other assets and the remainder comprised of unsecured facilities relying upon cash-flow or enterprise value. The vast majority of these commitments are syndicated transactions. CIT is lead agent in 37% of the facilities. Most of our undrawn and available financing commitments are in Corporate Finance with an average facility balance of $4.8 million. The top ten undrawn commitments totaled $419 million.
The table above excludes unused cancelable lines of credit to customers in connection with select third-party vendor programs, which may be used solely to finance additional product purchases. These uncommitted lines of credit can be reduced or canceled by CIT at any time without notice. Managements experience indicates that customers related to vendor programs typically exercise their line of credit only when they need to purchase new products from a vendor and do not seek to exercise their entire available line of credit at any point in time.
Letters of Credit and Guarantees
In the normal course of meeting the needs of clients, the Company enters into agreements to provide financing, letters of credit and deferred purchase credit protection agreements (DP Agreements). Standby letters of credit obligate the issuer of the letter of credit to pay the beneficiary if a client on whose behalf the letter of credit was issued does not meet its obligation. These financial instruments generate fees and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. To minimize potential credit risk, CIT generally requires collateral and in some cases additional forms of credit support from the client.
DP Agreements are provided primarily in conjunction with factoring, whereby we provide the client with credit protection for trade receivables without purchasing the receivables. The trade terms are generally sixty days or less. If the clients customer is unable to pay an undisputed receivable solely as the result of credit risk, then CIT purchases the receivable from the client.
16
Purchase and Funding Commitments
CITs firm purchase commitments relate predominantly to purchases of commercial aircraft and rail equipment. Commitments to purchase new commercial aircraft are with Airbus Industries and The Boeing Company. Aerospace equipment purchases are contracted for specific models, using baseline aircraft specification at fixed prices, which reflect discounts from fair market purchase prices prevailing at the time of commitment. The delivery price of an aircraft may change depending on final specifications. Equipment purchases are recorded at delivery date. Commitment amounts in the preceding table are based on contracted purchase prices less pre-delivery payments to date and exclude buyer furnished equipment selected by the lessee. Pursuant to existing contractual commitments, 87 aircraft remain to be purchased. Lease commitments are in place for the 19 aircraft to be delivered over the next twelve months. Commitments exclude unexercised options to purchase aircraft. Aircraft deliveries are scheduled periodically through 2018. Other manufacturing purchase commitments relate primarily to rail equipment.
NOTE 10 CONTINGENCIES
In accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), the Company establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that both are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. In view of the inherent unpredictability of litigation and regulatory matters, particularly where the damages sought are substantial or indeterminate, the investigations or proceedings are in the early stages, or the matters involve novel legal theories or a large number of parties, the Company cannot state with certainty the timing or ultimate resolution of litigation and regulatory matters, and the actual costs of resolving litigation and regulatory matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.
Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of the Companys management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account available insurance coverage and its current accruals, that the eventual outcome of such matters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company. Nonetheless, given the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, and the inherent unpredictability of such matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
NOTE 11 BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The following table presents our business segment financial information:
CIT |
Corporate Finance |
Transportation Finance |
Trade Finance |
Vendor Finance |
Total Commercial Segments |
Consumer
|
Total Segments |
Corporate and Other |
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the quarter ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 481.7 | $ | 53.4 | $ | 24.4 | $ | 333.2 | $ | 892.7 | $ | 95.8 | $ | 988.5 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 993.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (273.6 | ) | (234.6 | ) | (45.1 | ) | (190.4 | ) | (743.7 | ) | (64.2 | ) | (807.9 | ) | (5.7 | ) | (813.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (109.2 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (12.3 | ) | (111.9 | ) | (236.4 | ) | (9.3 | ) | (245.7 | ) | (15.0 | ) | (260.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 7.3 | 316.8 | | 96.1 | 420.2 | | 420.2 | (0.5 | ) | 419.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding rental income on operating leases | 205.9 | 18.2 | 47.0 | 26.2 | 297.3 | 18.3 | 315.6 | 15.0 | 330.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment | (5.6 | ) | (85.9 | ) | | (87.8 | ) | (179.3 | ) | | (179.3 | ) | 0.3 | (179.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses excluding depreciation on operating lease equipment | (89.7 | ) | (45.5 | ) | (33.0 | ) | (86.3 | ) | (254.5 | ) | (22.7 | ) | (277.2 | ) | 0.2 | (277.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and noncontrolling interests, after tax | (10.4 | ) | 5.7 | 3.0 | (41.2 | ) | (42.9 | ) | (3.7 | ) | (46.6 | ) | (24.8 | ) | (71.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 206.4 | $ | 25.1 | $ | (16.0 | ) | $ | (62.1 | ) | $ | 153.4 | $ | 14.2 | $ | 167.6 | $ | (25.5 | ) | $ | 142.1 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Select Period End Balances | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans including receivables pledged | $ | 9,845.7 | $ | 1,671.3 | $ | 2,514.6 | $ | 6,066.1 | $ | 20,097.7 | $ | 8,785.5 | $ | 28,883.2 | $ | | $ | 28,883.2 | |||||||||||||||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | | | (877.3 | ) | | (877.3 | ) | | (877.3 | ) | | (877.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | 514.8 | 10.4 | | 18.8 | 544.0 | 28.5 | 572.5 | | 572.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 104.2 | 10,296.9 | | 549.6 | 10,950.7 | | 10,950.7 | | 10,950.7 |
17
Corporate Finance |
Transportation Finance |
Trade Finance |
Vendor Finance |
Total Commercial Segments |
Consumer
|
Total Segments |
Corporate and Other |
Consolidated Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Predecessor CIT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the quarter ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 243.7 | $ | 39.9 | $ | 31.0 | $ | 224.8 | $ | 539.4 | $ | 68.5 | $ | 607.9 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 614.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (126.4 | ) | (139.2 | ) | (13.1 | ) | (140.5 | ) | (419.2 | ) | (83.4 | ) | (502.6 | ) | (131.0 | ) | (633.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (430.4 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (20.1 | ) | (77.4 | ) | (528.1 | ) | (32.5 | ) | (560.6 | ) | (27.9 | ) | (588.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 11.3 | 337.5 | | 125.2 | 474.0 | | 474.0 | (0.5 | ) | 473.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding rental income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
on operating leases | (234.2 | ) | 14.6 | 55.7 | 15.2 | (148.7 | ) | (8.3 | ) | (157.0 | ) | (41.8 | ) | (198.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment | (7.6 | ) | (165.0 | ) | | (114.3 | ) | (286.9 | ) | | (286.9 | ) | 0.3 | (286.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
charges | (316.8 | ) | | (363.8 | ) | (11.8 | ) | (692.4 | ) | | (692.4 | ) | | (692.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses, excluding depreciation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
on operating lease equipment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and goodwill and intangible assets impairment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
charges | (94.1 | ) | (34.2 | ) | (32.7 | ) | (84.1 | ) | (245.1 | ) | (14.4 | ) | (259.5 | ) | (34.4 | ) | (293.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and noncontrolling interests, after tax | 291.4 | (4.1 | ) | 126.7 | 27.0 | 441.0 | 27.7 | 468.7 | (480.7 | ) | (12.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net (loss) income before | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
preferred stock dividends | $ | (663.1 | ) | $ | 49.3 | $ | (216.3 | ) | $ | (35.9 | ) | $ | (866.0 | ) | $ | (42.4 | ) | $ | (908.4 | ) | $ | (709.4 | ) | $ | (1,617.8 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Select Period End Balances | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans including receivables pledged | $ | 18,053.6 | $ | 2,424.1 | $ | 5,055.8 | $ | 11,331.6 | $ | 36,865.1 | $ | 11,865.2 | $ | 48,730.3 | $ | | $ | 48,730.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | | | (2,671.8 | ) | | (2,671.8 | ) | | (2,671.8 | ) | | (2,671.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | 361.7 | 10.8 | | 0.7 | 373.2 | 54.1 | 427.3 | | 427.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 206.0 | 12,309.5 | | 864.6 | 13,380.1 | | 13,380.1 | | 13,380.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized assets | 645.8 | | | 470.1 | 1,115.9 | | 1,115.9 | | 1,115.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CIT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 985.7 | $ | 110.9 | $ | 54.9 | $ | 692.8 | $ | 1,844.3 | $ | 188.6 | $ | 2,032.9 | $ | 9.6 | $ | 2,042.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (570.6 | ) | (493.1 | ) | (83.6 | ) | (358.3 | ) | (1,505.6 | ) | (135.1 | ) | (1,640.7 | ) | (10.7 | ) | (1,651.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (203.6 | ) | (4.3 | ) | (46.2 | ) | (164.4 | ) | (418.5 | ) | (13.8 | ) | (432.3 | ) | (15.0 | ) | (447.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 16.1 | 616.0 | | 206.9 | 839.0 | | 839.0 | (1.1 | ) | 837.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding rental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
income on operating leases | 309.0 | 40.4 | 93.1 | 53.4 | 495.9 | 24.1 | 520.0 | (57.2 | ) | 462.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment | (10.0 | ) | (164.5 | ) | | (178.5 | ) | (353.0 | ) | | (353.0 | ) | 0.5 | (352.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
depreciation on operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment | (169.1 | ) | (85.1 | ) | (65.0 | ) | (173.2 | ) | (492.4 | ) | (44.2 | ) | (536.6 | ) | (2.3 | ) | (538.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and noncontrolling interests, after tax | (22.8 | ) | (3.0 | ) | 3.0 | (44.2 | ) | (67.0 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (67.2 | ) | (46.5 | ) | (113.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 334.7 | $ | 17.3 | $ | (43.8 | ) | $ | 34.5 | $ | 342.7 | $ | 19.4 | $ | 362.1 | $ | (122.7 | ) | $ | 239.4 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Corporate Finance |
Transportation Finance |
Trade Finance |
Vendor Finance |
Total Commercial Segments |
Consumer
|
Total Segments |
Corporate and Other |
Consolidated Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Predecessor CIT | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 499.3 | $ | 84.5 | $ | 62.4 | $ | 454.8 | $ | 1,101.0 | $ | 135.9 | $ | 1,236.9 | $ | 17.2 | $ | 1,254.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (276.4 | ) | (275.8 | ) | (29.2 | ) | (284.9 | ) | (866.3 | ) | (158.0 | ) | (1,024.3 | ) | (266.4 | ) | (1,290.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (823.8 | ) | 1.4 | (36.7 | ) | (158.1 | ) | (1,017.2 | ) | (72.6 | ) | (1,089.8 | ) | (34.1 | ) | (1,123.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 23.0 | 674.3 | | 252.4 | 949.7 | | 949.7 | (1.0 | ) | 948.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding rental | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
income on operating leases | (234.5 | ) | 23.3 | 110.1 | 41.5 | (59.6 | ) | (11.9 | ) | (71.5 | ) | 60.7 | (10.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment | (15.3 | ) | (327.1 | ) | | (226.8 | ) | (569.2 | ) | | (569.2 | ) | 0.6 | (568.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
charges | (316.8 | ) | | (363.8 | ) | (11.8 | ) | (692.4 | ) | | (692.4 | ) | | (692.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
depreciation on operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment and goodwill and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
intangible asset impairment charges | (200.9 | ) | (75.3 | ) | (69.1 | ) | (171.5 | ) | (516.8 | ) | (37.0 | ) | (553.8 | ) | 97.3 | (456.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for income taxes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and noncontrolling interests, after tax | 442.0 | (10.0 | ) | 119.1 | 43.2 | 594.3 | 54.7 | 649.0 | (669.5 | ) | (20.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net (loss) income before preferred | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stock dividends | $ | (903.4 | ) | $ | 95.3 | $ | (207.2 | ) | $ | (61.2 | ) | $ | (1,076.5 | ) | $ | (88.9 | ) | $ | (1,165.4 | ) | $ | (795.2 | ) | $ | (1,960.6 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NOTE 12 SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF SUBSIDIARIES
In accordance with the First Lien Facilities as well as requirements in the prepackaged bankruptcy, including the Series A Notes and Series B Notes, the following tables present three mutually exclusive sets of condensed consolidating financial statements, reflecting the following:
CIT Group Inc., as parent company, CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware, C.I.T. Leasing Corporation, CIT Financial Ltd., CIT Bank, and all Other Subsidiaries. Inter-company elimination entries for all subsidiaries are presented in the Eliminations column in the financial statements that follow.
Entities that are considered guarantors or non-guarantors. Guarantor entities are those that have guaranteed the debt under the First Lien Facilities and Second Lien Notes. Non-guarantors are all other entities including those which may have pledged assets but did not guarantee the debt. Inter-company elimination entries for all subsidiaries are presented in the Eliminations column in the financial statements that follow.
19
CIT Group Inc. |
CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware |
C.I.T. Leasing Corporation |
CIT Financial Ltd |
CIT Bank
|
Other Subsidiaries |
Eliminations
|
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans | $ | | $ | | $ | 906.8 | $ | 1,937.4 | $ | 5,185.6 | $ | 20,809.3 | $ | (293.7 | ) | $ | 28,545.4 | ||||||||||
Operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment, net | | | 1,131.2 | 56.8 | | 9,800.5 | (37.8 | ) | 10,950.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | | | 10.3 | | 28.5 | 533.7 | | 572.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and deposits with | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
banks | 1,597.4 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 146.6 | 1,661.9 | 7,250.9 | | 10,666.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 31,100.1 | | 18,797.1 | 1,245.9 | 692.6 | 1,415.0 | (49,068.9 | ) | 4,181.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 32,697.5 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 20,847.9 | $ | 3,386.7 | $ | 7,568.6 | $ | 39,809.4 | $ | (49,400.4 | ) | $ | 54,916.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EQUITY: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
including deposits | $ | 19,254.7 | $ | 2,194.7 | $ | 397.6 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 5,812.5 | $ | 15,336.4 | $ | (11.4 | ) | $ | 42,985.4 | ||||||||||
Credit balances of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
factoring clients | | | | | | 877.3 | | 877.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 4,810.4 | (2,314.9 | ) | 5,027.5 | 2,394.5 | 35.5 | (7,246.3 | ) | (286.5 | ) | 2,420.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 24,065.1 | (120.2 | ) | 5,425.1 | 2,395.4 | 5,848.0 | 8,967.4 | (297.9 | ) | 46,282.9 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 8,632.4 | 127.3 | 15,422.8 | 991.3 | 1,720.6 | 30,840.5 | (49,102.5 | ) | 8,632.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling minority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
interests | | | | | | 1.5 | | 1.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | 8,632.4 | 127.3 | 15,422.8 | 991.3 | 1,720.6 | 30,842.0 | (49,102.5 | ) | 8,633.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 32,697.5 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 20,847.9 | $ | 3,386.7 | $ | 7,568.6 | $ | 39,809.4 | $ | (49,400.4 | ) | $ | 54,916.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loans | $ | | $ | | $ | 925.3 | $ | 1,976.3 | $ | 6,467.3 | $ | 25,868.7 | $ | (371.8 | ) | $ | 34,865.8 | ||||||||||
Operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment, net | | | 1,088.3 | 47.4 | | 9,834.7 | (60.4 | ) | 10,910.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | | | 13.5 | 272.2 | 34.0 | 24.1 | | 343.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and deposits with | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
banks | 1,099.1 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 510.3 | 1,705.4 | 6,509.5 | (0.1 | ) | 9,825.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 29,309.7 | 9.9 | 18,550.6 | 1,591.4 | 763.8 | 1,421.8 | (47,563.6 | ) | 4,083.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 30,408.8 | $ | 11.3 | $ | 20,578.0 | $ | 4,397.6 | $ | 8,970.5 | $ | 43,658.8 | $ | (47,995.9 | ) | $ | 60,029.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EQUITY: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
including deposits | $ | 19,340.5 | $ | 2,198.2 | $ | 630.6 | $ | 37.0 | $ | 7,326.0 | $ | 19,104.3 | $ | (155.0 | ) | $ | 48,481.6 | ||||||||||
Credit balances of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
factoring clients | | | | | | 892.9 | | 892.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 2,674.7 | (2,389.9 | ) | 4,719.6 | 3,362.3 | 54.4 | (5,883.6 | ) | (284.3 | ) | 2,253.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 22,015.2 | (191.7 | ) | 5,350.2 | 3,399.3 | 7,380.4 | 14,113.6 | (439.3 | ) | 51,627.7 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | 8,393.6 | 203.0 | 15,227.8 | 998.3 | 1,590.1 | 29,543.8 | (47,556.6 | ) | 8,400.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling minority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
interests | | | | | | 1.4 | | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | 8,393.6 | 203.0 | 15,227.8 | 998.3 | 1,590.1 | 29,545.2 | (47,556.6 | ) | 8,401.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | $ | 30,408.8 | $ | 11.3 | $ | 20,578.0 | $ | 4,397.6 | $ | 8,970.5 | $ | 43,658.8 | $ | (47,995.9 | ) | $ | 60,029.1 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
CIT Group Inc. |
CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware |
C.I.T. Leasing Corporation |
CIT Financial Ltd |
CIT Bank |
Other Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1.0 | $ | 30.9 | $ | 50.4 | $ | 92.3 | $ | 163.5 | $ | 1,717.0 | $ | (12.6 | ) | $ | 2,042.5 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (892.2 | ) | (106.7 | ) | (127.9 | ) | 12.8 | (70.6 | ) | (479.4 | ) | 12.6 | (1,651.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | (891.2 | ) | (75.8 | ) | (77.5 | ) | 105.1 | 92.9 | 1,237.6 | | 391.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for credit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
losses | (11.1 | ) | | (1.8 | ) | (28.5 | ) | (11.5 | ) | (394.4 | ) | | (447.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
after credit provision | (902.3 | ) | (75.8 | ) | (79.3 | ) | 76.6 | 81.4 | 843.2 | | (56.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Equity in net income of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
subsidiaries | 798.0 | | 665.8 | (2.4 | ) | | 385.5 | (1,846.9 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental income on | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operating leases | | | 84.5 | 14.4 | | 740.0 | (1.0 | ) | 837.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 234.6 | | 6.0 | 140.8 | 24.2 | 57.7 | (0.5 | ) | 462.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other income | 234.6 | | 90.5 | 155.2 | 24.2 | 797.7 | (1.5 | ) | 1,300.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net revenue, net of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
interest expense and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
credit provision | 130.3 | (75.8 | ) | 677.0 | 229.4 | 105.6 | 2,026.4 | (1,848.4 | ) | 1,244.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment | | | (34.2 | ) | (10.0 | ) | | (308.8 | ) | 0.5 | (352.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 17.3 | | (42.1 | ) | (20.9 | ) | (22.7 | ) | (486.3 | ) | 15.8 | (538.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other expenses | 17.3 | | (76.3 | ) | (30.9 | ) | (22.7 | ) | (795.1 | ) | 16.3 | (891.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
income taxes | 147.6 | (75.8 | ) | 600.7 | 198.5 | 82.9 | 1,231.3 | (1,832.1 | ) | 353.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
income taxes | 91.9 | | | (63.5 | ) | (31.7 | ) | (110.3 | ) | | (113.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
attribution of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interests | 239.5 | (75.8 | ) | 600.7 | 135.0 | 51.2 | 1,121.0 | (1,832.1 | ) | 239.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interests, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
after tax | | | | | | (0.1 | ) | | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 239.5 | $ | (75.8 | ) | $ | 600.7 | $ | 135.0 | $ | 51.2 | $ | 1,120.9 | $ | (1,832.1 | ) | $ | 239.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
CIT Group Inc. |
CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware |
C.I.T. Leasing Corporation |
CIT Financial Ltd |
CIT Bank |
Other Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows From | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by (used for) operations | $ | (578.3 | ) | $ | (49.4 | ) | $ | 712.0 | $ | 189.0 | $ | 113.4 | $ | (208.6 | ) | $ | | $ | 178.1 | ||||||||||||
Cash Flows From | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net decrease in financing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and leasing assets and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
other investing activities | 3.8 | | (57.2 | ) | 286.0 | 1,288.5 | 5,601.7 | | 7,122.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
inter-company loans and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
investments | 1,158.5 | | | | | | (1,158.5 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash flows (used for) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
provided by investing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
activities | 1,162.3 | | (57.2 | ) | 286.0 | 1,288.5 | 5,601.7 | (1,158.5 | ) | 7,122.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flows From | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net decrease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in debt and other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
financing activities | (85.8 | ) | (3.5 | ) | (233.0 | ) | (36.1 | ) | (1,513.5 | ) | (4,346.8 | ) | | (6,218.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Inter-company financing | | 58.6 | (419.6 | ) | (802.6 | ) | 72.8 | (67.7 | ) | 1,158.5 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by (used for) financing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
activities | (85.8 | ) | 55.1 | (652.6 | ) | (838.7 | ) | (1,440.7 | ) | (4,414.5 | ) | 1,158.5 | (6,218.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in unrestricted cash | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and cash equivalents | 498.2 | 5.7 | 2.2 | (363.7 | ) | (38.8 | ) | 978.6 | | 1,082.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrestricted cash and cash | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equivalents, beginning of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
period | 1,099.1 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 510.3 | 1,617.6 | 5,176.5 | | 8,405.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrestricted cash and cash | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equivalents, end of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
period | $ | 1,597.3 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 146.6 | $ | 1,578.8 | $ | 6,155.1 | $ | | $ | 9,487.4 | |||||||||||||||
22
Guarantor Entities |
Non-Guarantor Entities |
Eliminations
|
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS: | |||||||||||||
Net loans | $ | 10,399.1 | $ | 18,438.7 | $ | (292.4 | ) | $ | 28,545.4 | ||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 9,162.0 | 1,827.5 | (38.8 | ) | 10,950.7 | ||||||||
Assets held for sale | 444.8 | 127.7 | | 572.5 | |||||||||
Cash and deposits with banks | 7,045.2 | 3,621.2 | | 10,666.4 | |||||||||
Other assets | 26,042.2 | 3,020.7 | (24,881.1 | ) | 4,181.8 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 53,093.3 | $ | 27,035.8 | $ | (25,212.3 | ) | $ | 54,916.8 | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY: | |||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings, including deposits | $ | 27,007.3 | $ | 16,209.1 | $ | (231.0 | ) | $ | 42,985.4 | ||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | 861.7 | 15.7 | (0.1 | ) | 877.3 | ||||||||
Other liabilities | 14,845.9 | (12,146.8 | ) | (278.9 | ) | 2,420.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 42,714.9 | 4,078.0 | (510.0 | ) | 46,282.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Stockholders Equity | 10,378.1 | 22,957.7 | (24,703.4 | ) | 8,632.4 | ||||||||
Noncontrolling minority interests | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Equity | 10,378.4 | 22,957.8 | (24,702.3 | ) | 8,633.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 53,093.3 | $ | 27,035.8 | $ | (25,212.3 | ) | $ | 54,916.8 | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS: | |||||||||||||
Net loans | $ | 15,373.1 | $ | 19,863.1 | $ | (370.4 | ) | $ | 34,865.8 | ||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 7,936.5 | 3,033.9 | (60.4 | ) | 10,910.0 | ||||||||
Assets held for sale | 303.1 | 40.7 | | 343.8 | |||||||||
Cash and deposits with banks | 6,772.4 | 3,053.6 | (0.1 | ) | 9,825.9 | ||||||||
Other assets | 23,650.2 | 3,390.5 | (22,957.1 | ) | 4,083.6 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 54,035.3 | $ | 29,381.8 | $ | (23,388.0 | ) | $ | 60,029.1 | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY: | |||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings, including deposits | $ | 30,665.7 | $ | 18,138.8 | $ | (322.9 | ) | $ | 48,481.6 | ||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | 871.7 | 21.2 | | 892.9 | |||||||||
Other liabilities | 12,102.0 | (9,547.9 | ) | (300.9 | ) | 2,253.2 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 43,639.4 | 8,612.1 | (623.8 | ) | 51,627.7 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Stockholders Equity | 10,394.6 | 20,769.6 | (22,764.2 | ) | 8,400.0 | ||||||||
Noncontrolling minority interests | 1.3 | 0.1 | | 1.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Equity | 10,395.9 | 20,769.7 | (22,764.2 | ) | 8,401.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 54,035.3 | $ | 29,381.8 | $ | (23,388.0 | ) | $ | 60,029.1 | ||||
|
|
|
|
23
Guarantor Entities |
Non-Guarantor Entities |
Eliminations
|
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1,199.7 | $ | 868.3 | $ | (25.5 | ) | $ | 2,042.5 | ||||||
Interest expense | (1,397.5 | ) | (267.2 | ) | 13.3 | (1,651.4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | (197.8 | ) | 601.1 | (12.2 | ) | 391.1 | |||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (312.4 | ) | (141.8 | ) | 6.9 | (447.3 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net interest revenue, after credit provision | (510.2 | ) | 459.3 | (5.3 | ) | (56.2 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in net income of subsidiaries | 608.2 | 261.3 | (869.5 | ) |
|
||||||||||
Other Income | |||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 656.9 | 182.0 | (1.0 | ) | 837.9 | ||||||||||
Other | 459.0 | 14.3 | (10.5 | ) | 462.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total other income | 1,115.9 | 196.3 | (11.5 | ) | 1,300.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total net revenue, net of interest | |||||||||||||||
expense and credit provision | 1,213.9 | 916.9 | (886.3 | ) | 1,244.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Other Expenses | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | (269.3 | ) | (83.7 | ) | 0.5 | (352.5 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses | (465.8 | ) | (98.9 | ) | 25.8 | (538.9 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total other expenses | (735.1 | ) | (182.6 | ) | 26.3 | (891.4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 478.8 | 734.3 | (860.0 | ) | 353.1 | ||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income taxes | 19.3 | (133.5 | ) | 0.6 | (113.6 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Income (loss) before attribution of | |||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interests | 498.1 | 600.8 | (859.4 | ) | 239.5 | ||||||||||
Income attributable to noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||
interests, after tax | | 0.4 | (0.5 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 498.1 | $ | 601.2 | $ | (859.9 | ) | $ | 239.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Guarantor Entities |
Non-Guarantor Entities |
Eliminations
|
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | |||||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by (used for) | |||||||||||||||
operations | $ | 3,320.3 | $ | (3,142.2 | ) | $ | | $ | 178.1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | |||||||||||||||
Net decrease in financing and leasing assets and other investing activities | 3,068.8 | 4,054.0 | | 7,122.8 | |||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in inter-company loans | |||||||||||||||
and investments | 1,158.5 | | (1,158.5 | ) | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net cash flows (used for) provided by investing | |||||||||||||||
activities | 4,227.3 | 4,054.0 | (1,158.5 | ) | 7,122.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | |||||||||||||||
Net decrease in debt and other financing activities | (3,658.4 | ) | (2,560.3 | ) | | (6,218.7 | ) | ||||||||
Inter-company financing | (3,616.4 | ) | 2,457.9 | 1,158.5 | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by (used for) financing | |||||||||||||||
activities | (7,274.8 | ) | (102.4 | ) | 1,158.5 | (6,218.7 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net increase in unrestricted cash and cash | |||||||||||||||
equivalents | 272.8 | 809.4 | | 1,082.2 | |||||||||||
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, beginning of | |||||||||||||||
period | 6,772.4 | 1,632.8 | | 8,405.2 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 7,045.2 | $ | 2,442.2 | $ | | $ | 9,487.4 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
24
Restricted Entities |
Unrestricted Entities |
Eliminations |
Consolidated Total |
|||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||||||||
Net loans | $ | 10,549.9 | $ | 18,287.9 | $ | (292.4 | ) | $ | 28,545.4 | |||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 9,258.5 | 1,731.0 | (38.8 | ) | 10,950.7 | |||||||||
Assets held for sale | 463.6 | 108.9 | | 572.5 | ||||||||||
Cash and deposits with banks | 5,675.0 | 4,991.4 | | 10,666.4 | ||||||||||
Other assets | 9,846.6 | 32,037.7 | (37,702.5 | ) | 4,181.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 35,793.6 | $ | 57,156.9 | $ | (38,033.7 | ) | $ | 54,916.8 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY: | ||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings, | ||||||||||||||
including deposits | $ | 7,583.4 | $ | 35,633.0 | $ | (231.0 | ) | $ | 42,985.4 | |||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | 861.7 | 15.7 | (0.1 | ) | 877.3 | |||||||||
Other liabilities | (2,588.2 | ) | 5,287.3 | (278.9 | ) | 2,420.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 5,856.9 | 40,936.0 | (510.0 | ) | 46,282.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Stockholders Equity | 29,936.4 | 16,220.8 | (37,524.8 | ) | 8,632.4 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling minority interests | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Equity | 29,936.7 | 16,220.9 | (37,523.7 | ) | 8,633.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 35,793.6 | $ | 57,156.9 | $ | (38,033.7 | ) | $ | 54,916.8 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
ASSETS: | ||||||||||||||
Net loans | $ | 16,364.5 | $ | 18,871.7 | $ | (370.4 | ) | $ | 34,865.8 | |||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 8,140.2 | 2,830.2 | (60.4 | ) | 10,910.0 | |||||||||
Assets held for sale | 303.1 | 40.7 | | 343.8 | ||||||||||
Cash and deposits with banks | 5,734.8 | 4,091.2 | (0.1 | ) | 9,825.9 | |||||||||
Other assets | 8,154.3 | 30,524.0 | (34,594.7 | ) | 4,083.6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 38,696.9 | $ | 56,357.8 | $ | (35,025.6 | ) | $ | 60,029.1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY: | ||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings, | ||||||||||||||
including deposits | $ | 11,339.6 | $ | 37,464.9 | $ | (322.9 | ) | $ | 48,481.6 | |||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | 871.7 | 21.2 | | 892.9 | ||||||||||
Other liabilities | (2,605.1 | ) | 5,159.3 | (301.0 | ) | 2,253.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 9,606.2 | 42,645.4 | (623.9 | ) | 51,627.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Stockholders Equity | 29,089.1 | 13,712.6 | (34,401.7 | ) | 8,400.0 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling minority interests | 1.6 | (0.2 | ) | | 1.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Equity | 29,090.7 | 13,712.4 | (34,401.7 | ) | 8,401.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 38,696.9 | $ | 56,357.8 | $ | (35,025.6 | ) | $ | 60,029.1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
25
Restricted Entities |
Unrestricted Entities |
Eliminations
|
Consolidated Total |
||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 1,254.1 | $ | 813.9 | $ | (25.5 | ) | $ | 2,042.5 | ||||||
Interest expense | (304.0 | ) | (1,360.7 | ) | 13.3 | (1,651.4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | 950.1 | (546.8 | ) | (12.2 | ) | 391.1 | |||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (328.0 | ) | (126.2 | ) | 6.9 | (447.3 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net interest revenue, after credit provision | 622.1 | (673.0 | ) | (5.3 | ) | (56.2 | ) | ||||||||
Equity in net income of subsidiaries | 149.3 | 893.9 | (1,043.2 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other Income | |||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 669.8 | 169.1 | (1.0 | ) | 837.9 | ||||||||||
Other | 314.0 | 159.3 | (10.5 | ) | 462.8 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total other income | 983.8 | 328.4 | (11.5 | ) | 1,300.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total net revenue, net of interest expense | |||||||||||||||
and credit provision | 1,755.2 | 549.3 | (1,060.0 | ) | 1,244.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Other Expenses | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | (286.5 | ) | (66.5 | ) | 0.5 | (352.5 | ) | ||||||||
Operating expenses | (494.7 | ) | (70.0 | ) | 25.8 | (538.9 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Total other expenses | (781.2 | ) | (136.5 | ) | 26.3 | (891.4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 974.0 | 412.8 | (1,033.7 | ) | 353.1 | ||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income taxes | (83.0 | ) | (31.2 | ) | 0.6 | (113.6 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution | |||||||||||||||
of noncontrolling interests | 891.0 | 381.6 | (1,033.1 | ) | 239.5 | ||||||||||
Loss (income) attributable to | |||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interests, after tax | 0.3 | | (0.4 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 891.3 | $ | 381.6 | $ | (1,033.5 | ) | $ | 239.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13 SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 27, 2010, CIT announced its intention to explore refinancing the First Lien Facilities with investors. CIT plans to repay approximately $1 billion using cash and refinance the remaining $3 billion through a new first lien facility with an expected term of five years at a rate of LIBOR plus 4.5%, with a 1.75% floor. Necessary lender commitments were received on August 3, 2010 and the Company expects the transaction to close the week of August 9, 2010.
ITEM 2. | | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
and
|
||
ITEM 3. | | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
CIT Group Inc. is a bank holding company that provides financing and leasing capital principally for small businesses and middle market companies worldwide. We serve a wide variety of industries and offer vendor, equipment, commercial and structured financing products, as well as factoring and management advisory services. CIT is the parent of CIT Bank, a state-chartered bank in Utah. We operate primarily in North America, with locations in Europe, Latin America and Asia. CIT, which became a bank holding company (BHC) in 2008, has been providing financial solutions to its clients since its formation in 1908.
On November 1, 2009, CIT Group Inc. and CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware LLC filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Both companies emerged on December 10, 2009 after cancelling the preferred and common stock of CIT Group Inc. and discharging their obligations to holders of certain senior debt, junior subordinated debt and equity units in exchange for issuing new senior notes (Series A and Series B) and new common stock of CIT Group Inc. To preserve valuable tax attributes following emergence from bankruptcy, we included restrictions in our Certificate of Incorporation on any shareholder who owns five percent or more of their new common stock. See Income Taxes. The terms CIT and Company, when used with respect to periods commencing after emergence from bankruptcy, are references to Successor CIT and when used with respect to periods prior to emergence, are references to Predecessor CIT. These references include subsidiaries of Successor CIT or Predecessor CIT, unless otherwise indicated or the context requires otherwise. Financial information about Successor CIT reflects the impact of fresh start accounting (FSA) unless otherwise indicated.
Additional information regarding the Company, including a description of its 2009 restructuring and its stated 2010 priorities and performance expectations, can be found in Item 7 and Item 7A Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
In the following discussion, we use financial terms that are relevant to our business. You can find a glossary of these terms in Item 1 Business Overview in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW AND FRESH START ACCOUNTING
We continued to execute on the strategic priorities outlined earlier in the year. We have substantially completed the build out of our senior corporate leadership team including the hiring of a new Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Head of Strategy, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Regulatory Officer, and Head of Human Resources in the second quarter and a new Controller and Head of Communications, Marketing and Government Relations since the end of the quarter. We have identified a candidate for one additional leadership position who we expect to hire upon receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals.
We made progress paying down our high cost first lien debt and re-accessing the capital markets for cost-efficient financing. Through the first six months of 2010, we repaid slightly over $3 billion of first lien facilities and made an additional repayment the first week of July reducing the principal amount of outstanding first lien debt to $4.0 billion. We also raised over $2.5 billion of secured debt in 2010 in the capital markets across a variety of asset classes, including trade and vendor receivables, aircraft and other lease equipment. These financings have all been at attractive rates, with costs averaging approximately 4% including amortization of related fees.
We made progress optimizing our asset portfolio. We sold over $3 billion of non-strategic assets year-to-date including non-core operations in Australia and Canada, certain Corporate Finance loans, and approximately 6% of our liquidating student loan portfolio. These sales have, in aggregate, occurred at prices above our FSA adjusted carrying values and provided liquidity for the aforementioned debt repayments.
We continue to work with our regulators in a constructive manner addressing the issues cited in our Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Much of that effort focuses on enhancing our overall risk and credit management policies, procedures and practices. Finally, we remain focused on expenses and we have and will continue to make progress driving operating efficiencies. However, we are equally committed to further investing in the risk management and control functions necessary to successfully operate as a bank holding company.
Our year-to-date financial results reflect the progress we have made on our initiatives. The balance sheet has contracted, reflecting our pro-active efforts to optimize our debt refinancing strategies, and we have increased our capital, built reserves and hold in excess of $10 billion of cash. We reported net income of nearly $240 million for the first half of the year, due in large part to the favorable accretion benefits stemming from FSA. Those benefits exceeded our initial forecasts as cash prepayments on loans were particularly strong in the first half of the year, resulting in accelerated accretion of FSA discounts.
27
As a result of our successes, our Tier One and Total Capital Ratios improved to 17.4% and 18.2%, respectively, and our book value per share increased to $43.11 at June 30, 2010.
In reviewing our second quarter results, this management discussion and analysis focuses on sequential trends as prior year comparisons to Predecessor CIT lack relevance given the impact of FSA. In the second quarter, net income was up on higher other income partially offset by higher credit provisioning.
Net income for the quarter was $142 million, $0.71 per share, up from $97 million, $0.49 per share in the first quarter. Net income benefitted from $407 million pretax net accretion and lower depreciation due to FSA adjustments during the second quarter, compared to $421 million pre-tax net accretion in the first quarter. The increased earnings contributed to higher book value per common share ($43.11 at June 30, 2010 and $42.63 at March 31, 2010) and tangible book value per common share ($41.07 at June 30, 2010 and $40.43 at March 31, 2010).
Net interest revenue declined $31 million on lower financing assets and less net FSA accretion. However, total net revenues(1) increased 28% sequentially as an increase in Other Income offset the decline in net interest revenue.
Net finance revenue(1) (which includes operating lease rentals and depreciation) as a percentage of average earning assets was 4.03% compared to 4.09% last quarter and includes a 3.72% benefit from FSA. Excluding the impact from FSA and the prepayment penalty fees on the prepayment of high cost first lien debt, margin was 0.68% up slightly from the first quarter.
Other income (excluding operating lease rentals) increased from last quarter due to $130 million of gains on receivable and asset sales and $113 million of recoveries on receivables charged-off prior to the adoption of FSA. The 2010 first quarter included losses on foreign currency exposures that were largely hedged during the second quarter.
Non-personnel operating expenses were down. Salaries and compensation expenses increased from the first quarter on costs related to an employee retention program established last quarter. We are currently evaluating office space needs and plan to exit certain premises in the second half of 2010. Based on the alternatives being evaluated and current market conditions this evaluation could result in a charge of between $40 and $55 million in the second half of 2010.
Cash was up from the first quarter and consisted of unrestricted cash of $6.1 billion at the bank holding company, $1.7 billion at CIT Bank, $1.7 billion at operating subsidiaries and $1.2 billion in other restricted cash. We are developing access to more cost-efficient funding sources to support lending to our small business and middle market customers. We completed a new $650 million committed conduit facility for Trade Finance and a £100 million (approximately $150 million) committed Vendor Finance U.K. conduit facility, Vendor Finances first conduit facility outside of North America, during the second quarter. These transactions, when combined with first quarter financings, aggregate to over $2.5 billion in funding capacity. Our strengthened balance sheet and profitability resulted in improved capital ratios. Tier 1 and Total Capital ratios improved to 17.4% and 18.2%, respectively, from 15.7% and 16.1% at March 31, 2010.
Financing and leasing assets were reduced by almost $4 billion, through the combination of strategic asset sales and net portfolio collections. New business volume increased 14% from the first quarter to over $1 billion, with the greatest increase in Corporate Finance.
Debt was reduced by $3 billion during the quarter, primarily related to pre-payments on first lien facilities and secured borrowings. $2.3 billion of first lien debt was prepaid during the quarter ($1.5 billion in April and $0.8 billion in June). Approximately $450 million was prepaid just after the June 30, 2010 quarter-end, leaving $4 billion of the original $7.5 billion first lien debt outstanding on July 1, 2010.
On July 27, 2010, we announced that we intend to explore refinancing the first lien debt with investors. Our plan is to repay approximately $1 billion using cash and refinancing the remaining $3 billion through a new first lien facility with an expected term of five years at a rate of LIBOR plus 4.5%, with a 1.75% floor. Necessary lender commitments were received on August 3, 2010 and we expect the transaction to close the week of August 9, 2010.
Net charge-offs of $106 million were up $64 million from the first quarter driven principally by smaller balance loans where the marks were established on a portfolio basis. Non-accrual loans of $2.1 billion increased $120 million from the first quarter, driven primarily by Corporate Finance. These credit metrics include asset marks and other FSA-related items. However, net charge-offs do not reflect recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs recorded in other income, which were $113 million in the second quarter and $44 million in the first quarter.
Management also evaluates credit performance using credit metrics that exclude the impact of FSA. On this basis, gross charge-offs were $252 million, up $16 million from last quarter, driven by real estate and energy-related loans. These gross charge-offs also exclude recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs recorded in other income. Non-accrual loans of $3.0 billion decreased $54 million from the first quarter. In aggregate, portfolio credit quality was at levels similar to the first quarter.
The provision for credit losses increased $74.1 million from the first quarter primarily due to some incremental deterioration on loans previously discounted in FSA.
28
Corporate Finance, Transportation Finance, Trade Finance and Consumer results improved from last quarter, while Vendor Finance results declined.
Corporate Finance earnings improvement was driven by higher gains on asset sales and recoveries on loans charged off pre-FSA. Corporate Finance completed sales of a joint venture and other assets, proceeds of which were used to pay down debt. New business volume increased from the first quarter.
Transportation Finance increased earnings reflect higher operating lease margins on a lower tax provision. Aircraft demand remains high as the aerospace fleet was effectively fully utilized at June 30, 2010, with one aircraft currently being marketed after its existing lease expired in the second quarter. During the quarter six new aircraft valued at $0.3 billion were delivered. In early August 2010 a foreign-based airline to whom we have leased airplanes filed for bankruptcy protection in its home country and the U.S. At June 30, 2010 our exposure to this customer includes equipment under operating lease of approximately $270 million. We are consulting with counsel and diligently acting to preserve our rights under the leases and the value of our aircraft. Lease commitments are in place for all 19 aircraft to be delivered over the next twelve months. Rail revenue increased as utilization improved from 90% to 93% on modest increases in activity across most major car types, and rents improved on usage-based contracts.
Trade Finance narrowed its loss due to lower provision for credit losses, but its results remain impacted by the high cost of funds. At the end of the quarter the business closed a new committed conduit facility to more efficiently fund the business. The existing client base stabilized and the rate of attrition subsided. Factoring volume totaled $6.3 billion, flat with the first quarter, contributing to level factoring commissions.
Vendor Finance earnings declined reflecting reserve strengthening related to a liquidating consumer portfolio, higher allocated interest costs and a decrease in interest income due to lower asset levels. Vendor Finance completed the sale of its Australia and New Zealand business on June 30, 2010 (finance receivables of approximately $390 million) and established a committed funding facility for U.K. assets. New business volume was flat with last quarter. New business volume for continuing programs increased 8% from last quarter and total volume was over $1 billion for the first half of the year.
Consumer earnings were up from the first quarter and approximately $580 million of student loans were sold during the second quarter for a gain of $12 million.
Business trends are discussed further in Results by Business Segment.
Discussion of Results in Comparison to 2009
The following discussion highlights certain year over year results. However, FSA adjustments reflected in 2010 impact the usefulness and comparability of year over year comparisons.
Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, of $142.1 million, improved from the prior year loss of $1.7 billion, which included a $692 million goodwill and intangible assets impairment charge and approximately $200 million in losses on assets sales and related valuations. In contrast, 2010 results included $130 million in asset sale gains and $113 million in recoveries on pre-emergence charge-offs reported in other revenue. The 2010 provision for credit losses declined $328 million from the prior year, largely due to FSA discount reducing reported charge-offs in the current year. Even prior to FSA, gross charge-offs were $124 million below 2009. The current period results also benefitted from $407 million in net accretion of FSA adjustments as discussed previously. Net finance revenue margins (including net operating lease income) prior to FSA and excluding current period prepayment charges on debt repayments were 0.68% versus 1.10% in 2009, largely reflecting the high cost debt issued in the reorganization and the cost of additional liquidity.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010, of $239.4 million, improved from the prior year loss of $2.1 billion, reflecting the same trends and factors that drove the second quarter comparison. For the first half, the provision for credit losses was $677 million below 2009. Net finance margin was down, as 2010 net finance revenue margins prior to FSA and excluding current period prepayment charges were 0.67% versus 1.11% in the prior year.
Fresh Start Accounting
Upon emergence from bankruptcy, CIT adopted FSA. As a result, assets, liabilities and equity were reflected in our financial statements at fair value at December 31, 2009. FSA adjustments are reflected in 2010 and December 31, 2009 ending balances, while accretion and amortization of certain FSA adjustments are reflected in operating results for the quarters ended June 30 and March 31, 2010. Therefore, June 30, 2010 financial data is not comparable to June 30, 2009 data and comparisons throughout this document are primarily sequential.
The following table presents FSA adjustments by balance sheet caption:
At June 30, 2010 | At March 31, 2010 | At December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Accretable | Non-accretable | Accretable | Non-accretable | Accretable | Non-accretable | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Loans(1) | $ | (2,369.8 | ) | $ | (1,184.9 | ) | $ | (3,030.0 | ) | $ | (1,566.0 | ) | $ | (3,507.3 | ) | $ | (1,755.1 | ) | |||||
Operating lease equipment, net |
(3,109.3 | ) | | (3,153.4 | ) | | (3,239.7 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets |
168.5 | 239.4 | 201.5 | 239.4 | 225.1 | 239.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets | (261.2 | ) | | (285.2 | ) | | (321.0 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (5,571.8 | ) | $ | (945.5 | ) | $ | (6,267.1 | ) | $ | (1,326.6 | ) | $ | (6,842.9 | ) | $ | (1,515.7 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Deposits | $ | 112.3 | $ | | $ | 121.6 | $ | | $ | 131.4 | $ | | |||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
(3,195.0 | ) | | (3,284.9 | ) | | (3,394.4 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | | 285.4 | | 306.7 | | 336.6 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (3,082.7 | ) | $ | 285.4 | $ | (3,163.3 | ) | $ | 306.7 | $ | (3,263.0 | ) | $ | 336.6 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The June 2010 balances do not include approximately $255 million of discounts associated with loans which were transferred to assets held for sale in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
In addition to the accretion of the loans FSA adjustment recorded in interest income ($418 million in the second quarter), the accretable balance declined from March as a result of asset sales and transfers to held for sale. The decline in non-accretable balance is due to charge-offs, prepayments, asset sales and transfer of loan non-accretable discount to accretable discount. See Note 2 for additional information on this transfer.
29
The following table summarizes the impact of accretion and amortization of fresh start accounting adjustments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Corporate Finance |
Transportation Finance |
Trade | Vendor Finance |
Corporate and Other |
Total CIT |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 | Finance | Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 304.8 | $ | 20.6 | $ | 2.9 | $ | 58.4 | $ | 30.2 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 417.8 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | (45.2 | ) | (16.5 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (7.3 | ) | (9.4 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (80.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Rental income on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
leases | | (24.8 | ) | | | | | (24.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | 3.6 | 59.4 | | 7.1 | | | 70.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income | 18.4 | 3.7 | | | 1.8 | | 23.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 281.6 | $ | 42.4 | $ | 1.3 | $ | 58.2 | $ | 22.6 | $ | 0.8 | $ | 406.9 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 634.9 | $ | 43.5 | $ | 9.6 | $ | 121.4 | $ | 59.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 869.4 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense | (93.6 | ) | (45.7 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (18.3 | ) | (19.8 | ) | 0.2 | (180.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
leases | | (58.6 | ) |
|
| | | (58.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense | 5.0 | 116.9 |
|
16.0 | | | 137.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income | 45.9 | 9.2 |
|
| 4.6 | | 59.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 592.2 | $ | 65.3 | $ | 6.0 | $ | 119.1 | $ | 44.6 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 827.6 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to market conditions, there has been a high level of loan prepayments in the first half of 2010, resulting in higher accretion of interest income than was anticipated. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the accretion income related to prepayments of loans was $135 million and $279 million, respectively, primarily related to Corporate Finance, and is included in interest income.
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 993.5 | $ | 1,049.0 | $ | 614.5 | $ | 2,042.5 | $ | 1,254.1 | |||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 419.7 | 418.2 | 473.5 | 837.9 | 948.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Finance revenue | 1,413.2 | 1,467.2 | 1,088.0 | 2,880.4 | 2,202.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (813.6 | ) | (837.8 | ) | (633.6 | ) | (1,651.4 | ) | (1,290.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | (179.0 | ) | (173.5 | ) | (286.6 | ) | (352.5 | ) | (568.6 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue | $ | 420.6 | $ | 455.9 | $ | 167.8 | $ | 876.5 | $ | 343.5 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Average Earnings Assets (AEA) | $ | 41,747.3 | $ | 44,642.1 | $ | 61,261.4 | $ | 43,223.1 | $ | 61,816.3 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
As a % of AEA: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | 9.52 | % | 9.40 | % | 4.01 | % | 9.45 | % | 4.06 | % | |||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 4.02 | % | 3.75 | % | 3.09 | % | 3.88 | % | 3.07 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Finance revenue | 13.54 | % | 13.15 | % | 7.10 | % | 13.33 | % | 7.13 | % | |||||||||||
Interest expense | -7.80 | % | -7.51 | % | -4.13 | % | -7.64 | % | -4.18 | % | |||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | -1.71 | % | -1.55 | % | -1.87 | % | -1.63 | % | -1.84 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue | 4.03 | % | 4.09 | % | 1.10 | % | 4.06 | % | 1.11 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
As a % of AEA by Segment: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | 7.30 | % | 6.71 | % | 2.42 | % | 6.97 | % | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||
Transportation Finance | 1.65 | % | 0.65 | % | 2.00 | % | 1.15 | % | 2.14 | % | |||||||||||
Trade Finance | -4.85 | % | -1.72 | % | 2.95 | % | -3.22 | % | 2.57 | % | |||||||||||
Vendor Finance | 8.13 | % | 9.91 | % | 3.15 | % | 9.06 | % | 3.24 | % | |||||||||||
Commercial Segments | 4.78 | % | 4.97 | % | 2.50 | % | 4.87 | % | 2.48 | % | |||||||||||
Consumer | 1.39 | % | 0.91 | % | -0.49 | % | 1.14 | % | -0.36 | % |
30
Net finance revenue was favorably impacted by FSA accretion and depreciation adjustments, as detailed in the prior table. Excluding FSA adjustments and debt prepayment penalty fees of approximately $45 million in the second quarter and $15 million in the first quarter, net finance revenue totaled $83 million, down slightly from $86 million last quarter. The decline in interest income was primarily due to lower asset levels. Average earning assets were down $2.9 billion as sales and collection activity outpaced new business originations. Interest expense was down sequentially due to lower debt balances, but remains elevated.
As detailed in the following table, net finance revenue as a percentage of AEA for the 2010 periods includes significant favorable impact from net accretion and lower depreciation as a result of FSA.
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2010 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net finance revenue % | 4.03 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.06 | % | ||
Impact from FSA | -3.72 | % | -3.55 | % | -3.63 | % | ||
Secured credit facility prepayment penalty fee | 0.37 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.24 | % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Finance Revenue | 0.68 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.67 | % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although up a few basis points sequentially, high debt costs remain a prominent factor in the low margin rate. To lower future borrowing costs, we prepaid approximately $3.5 billion of our high cost first lien facilities (including amounts after second quarter end) and completed lower cost financings of $2.5 billion during the first six months of 2010. See Financial Performance Overview for current refinancing transaction. The increase in net margins was driven by reduction in high cost first lien debt and new lower cost secured financings but muted by the contraction in average earnings assets and higher cash balances.
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 15.30 | % | 15.28 | % | 14.30 | % | 15.29 | % | 14.53 | % | |||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | -6.52 | % | -6.34 | % | -8.66 | % | -6.43 | % | -8.71 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net operating lease revenue | 8.78 | % | 8.94 | % | 5.64 | % | 8.86 | % | 5.82 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net operating lease revenue, excluding FSA | 5.54 | % | 5.96 | % | 5.64 | % | 5.75 | % | 5.82 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Average Operating Lease Equipment (AOL) | $ | 10,973.5 | $ | 10,945.2 | $ | 13,240.3 | $ | 10,962.5 | $ | 13,052.6 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating lease revenue included an FSA benefit of $45 million in the current quarter ($79 million year-to-date) as lower depreciation helped offset reduced rental income on operating leases. Before FSA adjustments, net operating lease revenue declined $15 million sequentially due to lower balances of smaller ticket equipment, which also contributed to the lower margin percentage. Net operating lease revenue is primarily generated from aircraft and rail transportation portfolios. Utilization remained strong in aerospace and all of the new aircraft to be delivered over the next twelve months from our order book are placed on lease. Rail lease and utilization rates improved from last quarter to 93% on modest increases in activity across most major car types, and rents improved on usage-based contracts. See Concentrations Operating Leases.
Management analyzes credit trends both before and after FSA in order to provide comparability with our longer-term credit trends (which included pre-emergence / historical accounting) and credit trends experienced by other market participants.
Our credit metrics included the following trends:
Net charge-offs, though up $64 million from the first quarter, were partially offset by recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs (which are recorded in other income) which increased by $70 million in the second quarter from the first quarter. Gross charge-offs before the impact of FSA, were up $16 million sequentially, primarily due to charge-offs on real estate and energy loans in Corporate Finance, but were essentially flat relative to the prior quarter and significantly lower than the prior year.
Non-accrual loans were up from last quarter and year end, but exclusive of FSA, the increase from year end was less and amounts were down slightly from the first quarter, as improvement in non-accrual loan balances in Vendor Finance and Transportation Finance were offset by increased Corporate Finance balances, primarily in the communications and media industries.
31
Allowance for Loan Losses and Provision for Credit Losses
As a result of adopting FSA, the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2009 was eliminated and effectively recorded as discounts on loans as part of the fair value of finance receivables. A portion of the discount attributable to embedded credit losses is recorded as non-accretable discount and utilized as such losses occur, primarily on impaired, non-accrual loans. Any incremental deterioration on loans in this group will result in incremental provisions or charge-offs. Improvements or increases in forecasted cash flows in excess of non-accretable discount will reduce any allowance on the loan established after emergence from bankruptcy. Once such allowance (if any) has been reduced the non-accretable discount will be reclassified to accretable discount and will be recorded as finance income over the remaining life of the account. Recoveries on pre-emergence (2009 and prior) charge-offs are reflected in other income.
For performing pre-emergence loans, a provision for credit losses is recorded to reflect an estimate of losses in excess of FSA discount.
The second quarter provision for credit losses increased $74.1 million from the first quarter, as an incremental change in credit quality, which resulted in additional specific reserves and higher charge-offs in excess of FSA discounts, was partially offset by lower non-specific provisioning on new origination volume and performing pre-emergence loans. With respect to the incremental credit charges, the charge-offs are prior to $113 million and $157 million in recoveries for the second quarter and the first half of 2010, respectively, related to pre-emergence charge-offs. Incremental specific reserves in excess of FSA marks include charges related to a liquidating consumer portfolio in Vendor Finance.
At June 30, 2010, the $337.8 million allowance for loan losses reflects the provisioning for the first six months of 2010 of $447 million less net charge-offs of $149 million and also includes $40 million of reserves for securitized loans brought on-balance sheet in conjunction with the new accounting pronouncement related to consolidation of VIEs adopted on January 1, 2010.
The following table summarizes the components of the allowance and provision recorded in 2010:
Provision for Credit Losses | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Quarters Ended | Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 |
Allowance for Loan Losses |
|||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Reserve Activities | |||||||||||||
New originations and Trade Finance non-specific reserve | $ | 22.0 | $ | 37.0 | $ | 59.0 | $ | 59.0 | |||||
Non-specific reserves on performing pre-emergence portfolio | 57.0 | 74.3 | 131.3 | 127.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Reserve Activities | 79.0 | 111.3 | 190.3 | 186.0 | |||||||||
Incremental Change in Credit | |||||||||||||
Incremental reserves in excess of FSA marks on pre-emergence loans | 79.0 | 33.0 | 112.0 | 112.0 | |||||||||
Charge-offs in excess of non-accretable discount | 106.3 | 42.3 | 148.6 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total Incremental Change in Credit | 185.3 | 75.3 | 260.6 | 112.0 | |||||||||
Other | |||||||||||||
Establish reserve for Securitized Assets returned to | |||||||||||||
Balance Sheet to comply with new accounting standard
(no P&L impact) |
(3.0 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | 38.0 | |||||||
FX and other adjustments | (0.6 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | 1.8 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 260.7 | $ | 186.6 | $ | 447.3 | $ | 337.8 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses is intended to provide for losses inherent in the portfolio based on estimates of the ultimate outcome of collection efforts, realization of collateral values, and other pertinent factors such as estimation risk related to performance in prospective periods. We may make adjustments to the allowance depending on general economic conditions and specific industry weakness or trends in our portfolio credit metrics, including non-accrual loans and charge-off levels and realization rates on collateral.
32
Our allowance for loan losses includes: (1) specific reserves for impaired loans and (2) reserves for estimated losses inherent in non-impaired loans based on historic loss experience and our estimates of projected loss levels. Our policy is to recognize losses through charge-offs when there is loss certainty after considering the borrowers financial condition and underlying collateral and guarantees and the finalization of collection activities.
The following table presents detail on our allowance for loan losses including charge-offs and recoveries:
Quarters Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
CIT | Predecessor CIT | CIT | Predecessor CIT | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Reserve balance beginning of period | $ | 180.8 | $ | 1,316.3 | $ | | $ | 1,096.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 260.7 | 588.5 | 447.3 | 1,123.9 | |||||||||||||
Reserve changes relating to new accounting pronouncement | | | 39.7 | | |||||||||||||
Reserve changes relating to foreign currency translation, other | 2.6 | (10.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (12.7 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net additions to reserve for credit losses | 263.3 | 578.0 | 486.4 | 1,111.2 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Gross charge-offs | (113.3 | ) | (375.8 | ) | (157.7 | ) | (703.0 | ) | |||||||||
Recoveries(1) | 7.0 | 19.9 | 9.1 | 34.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net charge-offs | (106.3 | ) | (355.9 | ) | (148.6 | ) | (669.0 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Reserve balance end of period | $ | 337.8 | $ | 1,538.4 | $ | 337.8 | $ | 1,538.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Recoveries do not include $113.3 million and $157.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, of recoveries on accounts that were charged-off pre-FSA and are included in other income.
In addition to the reserves shown above, the non-accretable discount established in FSA is available to offset future charge-offs on individual loans. A total of $1.523 billion, comprised of remaining non-accretable discount of $1.185 billion and the allowance for loan losses of $338 million, is available to cover losses.
The decrease in non-accretable discounts during the six months ended June 30, 2010 is largely due to prepayments, asset sales and transfer of non-accretable discount to accretable discount. See Note 2 for additional information on this transfer.
The following table presents charge-offs by business segment. See Results by Business Segment for additional information.
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Gross charge-offs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 53.2 | $ | 26.9 | $ | 238.0 | $ | 80.1 | $ | 451.2 | ||||||||||||||
Transportation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance | | | 1.2 | | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trade Finance | 12.5 | 2.7 | 14.8 | 15.2 | 37.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Vendor Finance | 38.2 | 10.3 | 88.3 | 48.5 | 138.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 9.4 | 4.5 | 33.5 | 13.9 | 72.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total gross charge-offs | 113.3 | 44.4 | 375.8 | 157.7 | 703.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Recoveries | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 4.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Transportation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance | | | | | 0.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trade Finance | 0.1 | | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Vendor Finance | 5.5 | 0.8 | 14.5 | 6.3 | 23.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 0.1 | | 2.2 | 0.1 | 4.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total recoveries | 7.0 | 2.1 | 19.9 | 9.1 | 34.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | 51.9 | 1.84 | % | 25.6 | 0.84 | % | 235.4 | 4.78 | % | 77.5 | 1.32 | % | 446.6 | 4.44 | % | |||||||||
Transportation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance | | | | | 1.2 | 0.19 | % | | | 2.5 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||||||
Trade Finance | 12.4 | 1.89 | % | 2.7 | 0.38 | % | 14.2 | 1.09 | % |
15.1
|
1.11 | % | 36.6 | 1.37 | % | |||||||||
Vendor Finance | 32.7 | 2.04 | % | 9.5 | 0.49 | % | 73.8 | 2.63 | % | 42.2 | 1.18 | % | 115.3 | 2.06 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Commercial Segments | 97.0 | 1.76 | % | 37.8 | 0.61 | % | 324.6 | 3.36 | % | 134.8 | 1.15 | % | 601.0 | 3.06 | % | |||||||||
Consumer | 9.3 | 0.42 | % | 4.5 | 0.19 | % | 31.3 | 1.04 | % | 13.8 | 0.30 | % | 68.0 | 1.12 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 106.3 | 1.37 | % | $ | 42.3 | 0.49 | % | $ | 355.9 | 2.81 | % | $ | 148.6 | 0.91 | % | $ | 669.0 | 2.60 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Supplemental Non-US | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disclosure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross charge-offs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(commercial) | $ | 32.6 | $ | 7.0 | $ | 71.8 | $ | 39.6 | $ | 129.6 | ||||||||||||||
Recoveries | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(commercial) | $ | | $ | | $ | 8.8 | $ | | $ | 13.2 |
33
Quarters Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
CIT |
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
|||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Gross charge-offs | ||||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 164.2 | $ | 134.1 | $ | 238.0 | $ | 298.3 | $ | 451.3 | ||||
Transportation Finance | | | 1.2 | | 3.4 | |||||||||
Trade Finance | 12.5 | 4.7 | 14.8 | 17.2 | 37.3 | |||||||||
Vendor Finance | 55.1 | 67.9 | 88.3 | 123.0 | 138.7 | |||||||||
Consumer | 19.8 | 28.6 | 33.5 | 48.4 | 72.3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total gross charge-offs | $ | 251.6 | $ | 235.3 | $ | 375.8 | $ | 486.9 | $ | 703.0 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before FSA, gross charge-offs were up from the first quarter, largely due to real estate and energy-related loans in Corporate Finance where events during the period resulted in credit deterioration beyond the FSA marks. In relation to the prior year, amounts were down significantly, with significant reductions in all segments.
The increase from the first quarter in charge-offs after FSA was driven principally by smaller balance loans where the marks were established on a portfolio basis. This trend is most evident in Vendor Finance. As mentioned previously, both the pre- and post FSA 2010 amounts exclude recoveries on pre-emergence charge-offs which are reported in Other Income.
The tables below present information on non-accrual loans:
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-accrual loans | ||||||||
U.S. | $ | 1,920.9 | $ | 1,773.6 | $ | 1,465.5 | ||
Foreign | 131.0 | 157.7 | 108.8 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Commercial Segment | 2,051.9 | 1,931.3 | 1,574.3 | |||||
Consumer | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-accrual loans | $ | 2,052.4 | $ | 1,932.0 | $ | 1,574.4 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more (1) | $ | 437.7 | $ | 503.0 | $ | 570.1 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Balance includes $428.2 million, $479.2 million and $480.7 million as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, of government-guaranteed student loans.
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 1,646.2 | 16.72 | % | $ | 1,488.6 | 12.73 | % | $ | 1,374.8 | 11.31 | % | ||
Transportation Finance | 160.5 | 9.60 | % | 172.8 | 9.51 | % | 6.8 | 0.37 | % | |||||
Trade Finance | 96.0 | 3.82 | % | 90.5 | 3.24 | % | 90.5 | 3.02 | % | |||||
Vendor Finance | 149.2 | 2.46 | % | 179.4 | 2.65 | % | 102.2 | 1.25 | % | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Commercial Segments | 2,051.9 | 10.21 | % | 1,931.3 | 8.37 | % | 1,574.3 | 6.25 | % | |||||
Consumer | 0.5 | 0.01 | % | 0.7 | 0.01 | % | 0.1 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total | $ | 2,052.4 | 7.11 | % | $ | 1,932.0 | 6.03 | % | $ | 1,574.4 | 4.52 | % | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Predecessor CIT |
||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 2,290.7 | 19.57 | % | $ | 2,280.2 | 15.85 | % | $ | 2,226.1 | 14.64 | % | ||||
Transportation Finance | 175.2 | 9.44 | % | 185.3 | 9.18 | % | 8.4 | 0.38 | % | |||||||
Trade Finance | 96.0 | 3.81 | % | 90.5 | 3.23 | % | 97.3 | 3.24 | % | |||||||
Vendor Finance | 267.7 | 4.13 | % | 324.6 | 4.43 | % | 295.9 | 3.14 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Commercial Segments | 2,829.6 | 12.53 | % | 2,880.6 | 10.86 | % | 2,627.7 | 8.80 | % | |||||||
Consumer | 197.2 | 2.00 | % | 200.6 | 1.99 | % | 197.7 | 1.74 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total | $ | 3,026.8 | 9.33 | % | $ | 3,081.2 | 8.41 | % | $ | 2,825.4 | 6.86 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported non-accrual loans including FSA discount increased from the first quarter, largely due to the addition of loans in the communications and media industries in Corporate Finance. The rate of increase of inflows declined in the second quarter, as sales and paydowns offset new inflows which was at a level comparable to the first quarter. Non-accrual loans in Vendor Finance and Transportation Finance were down from the first quarter, both including and excluding FSA adjustments.
Excluding FSA, non-accrual loans in Corporate Finance remained essentially flat since December 31, 2009; an improvement relative to increases experienced in 2009. The increase in Transportation Finance during the first quarter primarily related to one account, which management believes is well collateralized. Vendor Finance non-accruals decreased from December 2009 principally due to lower levels in Europe operations, partially offset by an increase in a liquidating consumer program.
Losses on non-accrual loans are first applied against discounts and thus do not reduce post FSA loan balances to the same extent as pre-FSA balances.
Loans at June 30, 2010 include $383.7 million ($510.3 million exclusive of FSA discount) of modifications deemed to be troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). Of this amount, 99% were on non-accrual status. Approximately 60% of the TDR modifications were deferral of principal or interest payments. Additionally, $180 million of modifications were deemed to not be TDRs, with approximately 50% of these balances on non-accrual.
The following table summarizes accretable and non-accretable discounts on finance receivables resulting from FSA:
June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Accretable
|
Non-accretable
|
Accretable
|
Non-accretable
|
Accretable
|
Non-accretable
|
||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 1,299.4 | $ | 566.0 | $ | 1,807.9 | $ | 881.2 | $ | 2,169.9 | $ | 981.3 | |||||
Transportation Finance | 182.9 | 2.9 | 195.9 | 5.9 | 221.7 | 6.9 | |||||||||||
Trade Finance | 5.8 | | 8.7 | | 10.6 | 6.8 | |||||||||||
Vendor Finance | 229.1 | 193.1 | 313.3 | 238.3 | 381.6 | 302.3 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Commercial Segments | 1,717.2 | 762.0 | 2,325.8 | 1,125.4 | 2,783.8 | 1,297.3 | |||||||||||
Consumer | 652.6 | 422.9 | 704.2 | 440.6 | 723.5 | 457.8 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total | $ | 2,369.8 | $ | 1,184.9 | $ | 3,030.0 | $ | 1,566.0 | $ | 3,507.3 | $ | 1,755.1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
|||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | $ | 419.7 | $ | 418.2 | $ | 473.5 | $ | 837.9 | $ | 948.7 | ||||||||||
Other: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs | 113.3 | 43.8 | | 157.1 | | |||||||||||||||
Gains on loan and portfolio sales | 78.6 | 33.4 | (177.3 | ) | 112.0 | (172.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gains on sales of leasing equipment | 51.7 | 29.0 | 20.4 | 80.7 | 36.8 | |||||||||||||||
Factoring commissions | 34.9 | 36.2 | 46.8 | 71.1 | 90.9 | |||||||||||||||
GSI receivable accretion | 23.9 | 35.8 | | 59.7 | | |||||||||||||||
Fees and commissions | 20.4 | 31.2 | 4.5 | 51.6 | 35.1 | |||||||||||||||
Gains/(losses) on non-qualifying derivatives and | ||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency exchange | 7.8 | (77.2 | ) | | (69.4 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Investment losses | | | (30.1 | ) | | (30.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Mark to estimated fair value TARP warrant | ||||||||||||||||||||
liability | | | (25.2 | ) | | 70.6 | ||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance for assets held for sale | | | (37.9 | ) | | (41.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Other | 330.6 | 132.2 | (198.8 | ) | 462.8 | (10.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other income | $ | 750.3 | $ | 550.4 | $ | 274.7 | $ | 1,300.7 | $ | 937.9 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current quarter other income benefited from increased recoveries on pre-FSA charge-offs and gains on loan and asset sales, while prior quarter results included losses on non-qualifying derivatives and foreign currency exchange.
Rental income on operating leases was relatively unchanged on flat asset levels and includes FSA amortization of $24.8 million and $33.8 million for the June and March 2010 quarters. See Net Finance Revenues and Financing and Leasing Assets Results by Business Segment and Concentrations Operating Leases.
Recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs reflect recoveries of loans charged off prior to the adoption of FSA and are recorded as other income, not as a reduction to provision for loan losses. These result from repayments or other workout resolutions.
Gains on loan and portfolio sales primarily reflect amounts received in excess of current net asset carrying values. As the economy recovers, sales volume and prices strengthened. Receivables sold totaled $1,845.6 million for the June 2010 quarter with $809.1 million from Corporate Finance, $582.1 million in student loans, and $454.4 million from Vendor Finance. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, receivables sold totaled $2,454.6 million with $1,008.4 from Corporate Finance, $864.1 million from Vendor Finance and $582.1 million in student loans.
Gains on sales of leasing equipment resulted from sales volume of $257.3 million for the June 2010 quarter and $509.2 million for the six months ended June 2010. Equipment sales consist of vendor off lease equipment (technology related), aircraft and railcars, as well as assets in the healthcare and commercial and industrial sectors.
GSI receivable accretion primarily reflects the accretion of a fair value mark on a receivable from GSI related to a secured borrowing facility. See Other Assets/Other Liabilities
Fees and commissions are comprised of asset management, agent and advisory fees, servicing fees, accretion and impairments, as well as income from joint ventures. Fees and commissions reflect low market activity and reduced joint venture earnings.
Gains/(losses) on non-qualifying derivatives and foreign currency exchange reflect foreign currency exposures that were largely hedged during the second quarter.
36
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | $ | 179.0 | $ | 173.5 | $ | 286.6 | $ | 352.5 | $ | 568.6 | |||||||||||
Salaries and general operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | 179.3 | 140.1 | 159.9 | 319.4 | 323.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional fees | 25.6 | 29.7 | 32.2 | 55.3 | 62.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Technology | 18.2 | 19.2 | 18.5 | 37.4 | 39.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Net occupancy expense | 11.3 | 14.9 | 15.9 | 26.2 | 32.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Other | 40.0 | 46.1 | 44.8 | 86.1 | 95.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total salaries and general operating expenses | 274.4 | 250.0 | 271.3 | 524.4 | 553.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for severance and facilities exiting | |||||||||||||||||||||
activities | 2.6 | 11.9 | 22.6 | 14.5 | 42.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges | | | 692.4 | | 692.4 | ||||||||||||||||
(Gains) losses on debt and debt-related derivative | |||||||||||||||||||||
extinguishments | | | | | (139.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total other expenses | $ | 456.0 | $ | 435.4 | $ | 1,272.9 | $ | 891.4 | $ | 1,717.5 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Headcount (1) | 4,006 | 4,089 | 4,690 |
(1) |
Includes approximately 130 employees in the Vendor Australia/New Zealand operations that were transferred as part of the sale that closed on June 30, 2010 |
Depreciation on operating lease equipment is recognized on owned equipment over the lease term or projected economic life of the asset, whichever is shorter. FSA adjustments reduced 2010 depreciation expense by $70.1 million and $137.9 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. See Net Finance Revenues, Financing and Leasing Assets Results by Business Segment and Concentrations Operating Leases.
Non-personnel expenses (professional fees, technology, occupancy, etc) declined sequentially, but were offset by higher Compensation and benefits costs, related to an employee retention program established during the first quarter. Headcount and related compensation expenses include personnel (approximately 130 in the Australia / New Zealand business that was sold on June 30, 2010.
Provision for severance and facilities exiting activities reflects reductions of over 50 employees as we continue to focus on organization efficiencies. We are currently evaluating office space needs and plan to exit certain premises in the second half of 2010. Based on the alternatives being evaluated and current market conditions, this evaluation could result in a charge of between $40 and $55 million in the second half of 2010.
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT |
Predecessor CIT |
CIT |
Predecessor
CIT |
|||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income | ||||||||||||||||||||
taxes | $ | 56.8 | $ | 33.2 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 90.0 | $ | (3.4 | ) | |||||||||
NOL valuation | ||||||||||||||||||||
adjustments/changes in uncertain | ||||||||||||||||||||
tax liabilities | 14.3 | 9.3 | 11.2 | 23.6 | 24.1 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 71.1 | $ | 42.5 | $ | 12.7 | $ | 113.6 | $ | 20.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Effective tax rate excluding discrete items |
26.6 | % | 23.9 | % | (0.1 | )% | 25.5 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||
Effective tax rate | 33.3 | % | 30.6 | % | (0.8 | )% | 32.2 | % | (1.1 | )% |
37
Taxes on certain international operations and valuation allowances recorded against U.S. losses has driven the effective tax rate for the second quarter and year to date 2010. The provision for 2010 largely results from tax on international operations. The year end 2010 effective tax rate may vary from the current rate primarily due to changes in the mix of domestic and international earnings and the impact of the valuation allowance recorded against US and international deferred taxes in 2010.
Included in the second quarter 2010 and year to date tax provisions are $14.3 million and $23.6 million, respectively, of tax expense related to valuation allowances recorded against international deferred tax assets and changes in liabilities for uncertain tax positions. The Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the total unrecognized tax benefits will decrease due to the settlement of audits and the expiration of statute of limitations prior to June 30, 2011 in the range of $5-$20 million. The tax provisions for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 included $11.2 million and $24.1 million, primarily related to increases in state tax valuation allowances partially offset by favorable settlements of a foreign tax dispute.
At December 31, 2009, we had NOLs of $7.6 billion prior to cancellation of indebtedness income. After cancellation of indebtedness income, we estimate that we currently have remaining NOL carryforwards of $2.6 billion, which expire from 2027 through 2029. FSA adjustments are excluded from the calculation of US taxable income. Excluding FSA adjustments, second quarter and year to date 2010 U.S. results were a loss of approximately $625 million and $1 billion, respectively, which will increase, net of book / tax differences, the companys U.S. NOL carryforwards. These losses would not be subject to Section 382 limitations.
In 2009, CITs reorganization constituted an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code which places an annual dollar limit on the use of NOL carry forwards. There are two relief provisions for limitations on NOL usage in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Under one provision, we avoid any limitation on our use of NOL carry forwards, but the amount of the NOL is calculated without taking into account deductions for certain interest expense with respect to notes that were exchanged for equity, effectively reducing our NOL. In addition, if we undergo an ownership change within two years of the reorganization, our remaining NOL carry forwards, if any, would be entirely eliminated. To reduce this risk, our Certificate of Incorporation was amended to include restrictions on trading of the Companys Common Stock (see discussion below). Under the second provision, the calculation of the annual limitation of usage of NOLs is based on the value of equity immediately after any ownership change. If we elect this second provision, we estimate our NOL usage will be limited to $230 million per annum; however, the requirement to eliminate unused NOL carry forwards upon a change of ownership within two years of the reorganization would not apply. We have not yet made our final determination of which relief provision we will select. See our 10-K for December 31, 2009 for further information regarding the two relief provisions and the effects of the 2009 reorganization.
Tax Attribute Preservation Provision
In order to preserve valuable tax attributes following emergence from bankruptcy, restrictions were included in our Certificate of Incorporation on transfers of Successor Common Stock (the Tax Attribute Preservation Provision). During the Restriction Period (as defined in our Certificate of Incorporation), unless approved by the Board, any attempted transfer of Successor Common Stock is prohibited and void to the extent that, as a result of such transfer (or any series of transfers) either (i) any person or group of persons shall become a five-percent shareholder of the Company (as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.382-2T(g)) or (ii) the ownership interest of any five-percent shareholder shall be increased.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing in the Tax Attribute Preservation Provision shall prevent a person from transferring New Common Stock to a new or existing public group of the Company, as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.382-2T(f)(13) or any successor regulation. The restrictions described above (the Restriction Period) commenced on the December 8, 2009 Confirmation Date and will remain in effect until the earlier of (a) 45 days after the second anniversary of the Confirmation Date, and (b) the date that the Board determines that (1) the consummation of the Plan did not satisfy the requirements of section 382(l)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code or treatment under that section is not in the best interests of the Company, (2) an ownership change, as defined under the Internal Revenue Code, would not result in a substantial limitation on the ability to use otherwise available tax attributes, or (3) no significant value attributable to such tax benefits would be preserved by continuing the transfer restrictions.
See Note 11 Business Segment Information for additional details.
Certain expenses are not allocated to our operating segments and are reported in Corporate and Other. These consist primarily of: (1) provision for severance and facilities exit charges; (2) certain tax provisions and benefits; and (3) losses on foreign currency exposures and related items.
In 2009, Corporate and Other also includes certain funding costs not allocated to our segments. Essentially all funding costs including prepayment penalties on the first lien facilities were allocated to segments in 2010.
38
Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance provides financing solutions and advisory services to small and mid-size businesses in a wide array of industries, including commercial and industrial (C&I), communications, media and entertainment (CM&E), healthcare, small business lending, and energy. Revenue is generated primarily from interest earned on loans, supplemented by fees collected on other services provided, such as advisory, arrangement and collateral and administrative agent services.
(dollars in millions) | Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT |
Predecessor CIT |
CIT |
Predecessor CIT |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March
31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
Earnings Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 481.7 | $ | 504.0 | $ | 243.7 | $ | 985.7 | $ | 499.3 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (273.6 | ) | (297.0 | ) | (126.4 | ) | (570.6 | ) | (276.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (109.2 | ) | (94.4 | ) | (430.4 | ) | (203.6 | ) | (823.8 | ) | |||||||||||
Rental income on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
leases | 7.3 | 8.8 | 11.3 | 16.1 | 23.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
rental income | 205.9 | 103.1 | (234.2 | ) | 309.0 | (234.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
lease equipment | (5.6 | ) | (4.4 | ) | (7.6 | ) | (10.0 | ) | (15.3 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expenses, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
depreciation | (89.7 | ) | (79.4 | ) | (94.1 | ) | (169.1 | ) | (200.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible | |||||||||||||||||||||
assets impairment charges | | | (316.8 | ) | | (316.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for | |||||||||||||||||||||
income taxes and | |||||||||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interests, | |||||||||||||||||||||
after tax | (10.4 | ) | (12.4 | ) | 291.4 | (22.8 | ) | 442.0 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 206.4 | $ | 128.3 | $ | (663.1 | ) | $ | 334.7 | $ | (903.4 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Select Average Balances | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average finance receivables | |||||||||||||||||||||
(AFR) | $ | 11,290.5 | $ | 12,156.1 | $ | 19,708.7 | $ | 11,776.5 | $ | 20,123.0 | |||||||||||
Average operating leases | |||||||||||||||||||||
(AOL) | 118.5 | 136.9 | 166.0 | 127.4 | 177.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Average earning assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
(AEA) | 11,497.1 | 12,607.3 | 19,976.1 | 12,087.3 | 20,345.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Statistical Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue | |||||||||||||||||||||
(interest and rental income, | |||||||||||||||||||||
net of interest and | |||||||||||||||||||||
depreciation expense) as a | |||||||||||||||||||||
% of AEA | 7.30 | % | 6.71 | % | 2.42 | % | 6.97 | % | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||
New business volume | $ | 245.1 | $ | 145.4 | $ | 444.3 | $ | 390.5 | $ | 785.7 |
Corporate Finance sequential earnings improvement was driven by higher gains on asset sales and recoveries on preFSA charge-offs. Corporate Finance has seen its pipeline of new originations increase with over 300 deals under review since the beginning of the year, and ten transactions funded in the second quarter, which had over 60% of commitment volume in asset-based loans. New applications in Small Business Lending increased 15% from the prior quarter. Overall, Corporate Finance second quarter commitment volume increased significantly from the first quarter.
Corporate Finance continues to further optimize its cost structure and loan portfolio by selling non-strategic assets and underperforming loans, though the pace will vary based on changes in pricing and market supply and demand. Assets sold were a combination of credit concern assets, non-performing loans, real estate and lower margin and non-strategic performing loans. Headcount has been reduced commensurate with reduced portfolio size.
39
Net income for the quarter increased $78.1 million principally from a large increase in other income due to gains on asset sales and recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs, partially offset by higher charge-offs and higher operating expenses.
Net finance revenue improved as a percentage to AEA primarily due to higher loan prepayment fees and lower AEA.
Provision for credit losses reflects $26.3 million increased net charge-offs due to real estate and energy-related loans and recording of general loss reserves on existing loans. Recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs recorded in other income were greater than current quarter charge-offs.
Other income is $102.8 million higher than the first quarter due to recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs and gains on asset sales, including realization of FSA discounts on assets sold.
Operating expenses increased from the first quarter primarily due to a full quarters charge for the corporate retention program and higher legal costs.
Non-accrual loans increased $157.6 million from March 31, 2010 due to the addition of loans in communications and media industries.
Assets declined $1.6 billion from the first quarter due to focus on asset sales to pay down high-cost first lien debt, continued line pay down, and prepayments and non-renewals of existing lines driven by improved market pricing. Asset sales in the second quarter consisted of $809.1 million of finance receivable sales including a Joint Venture transaction and $82.0 million of equipment sales.
Transportation Finance
Transportation Finance leases primarily commercial aircraft to airline companies globally and rail equipment to North American operators, and provides other financing to these customers as well as those in the defense sector. Revenue is generated from rents collected on leased assets, and to a lesser extent from interest on loans, fees and gains from assets sold.
(dollars in millions) | Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March
31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
Earnings Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 53.4 | $ | 57.5 | $ | 39.9 | $ | 110.9 | $ | 84.5 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (234.6 | ) | (258.5 | ) | (139.2 | ) | (493.1 | ) | (275.8 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (3.0 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (4.3 | ) | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Rental income on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
leases | 316.8 | 299.2 | 337.5 | 616.0 | 674.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
rental income | 18.2 | 22.2 | 14.6 | 40.4 | 23.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
lease equipment | (85.9 | ) | (78.6 | ) | (165.0 | ) | (164.5 | ) | (327.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expenses, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
depreciation | (45.5 | ) | (39.6 | ) | (34.2 | ) | (85.1 | ) | (75.3 | ) | |||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for | |||||||||||||||||||||
income taxes and | |||||||||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interest, | |||||||||||||||||||||
after tax | 5.7 | (8.7 | ) | (4.1 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (10.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 25.1 | $ | (7.8 | ) | $ | 49.3 | $ | 17.3 | $ | 95.3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Select Average Balances | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average finance receivables | $ | 1,747.6 | $ | 1,841.4 | $ | 2,464.3 | $ | 1,791.3 | $ | 2,586.4 | |||||||||||
Average operating leases | 10,271.8 | 10,162.0 | 12,190.0 | 10,220.9 | 11,972.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Average earning assets | 12,020.1 | 12,004.0 | 14,662.2 | 12,012.8 | 14,565.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Statistical Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue as a % | |||||||||||||||||||||
of AEA | 1.65 | % | 0.65 | % | 2.00 | % | 1.15 | % | 2.14 | % | |||||||||||
Operating lease margin as a | |||||||||||||||||||||
% of AOL | 8.99 | % | 8.68 | % | 5.66 | % | 8.83 | % | 5.80 | % | |||||||||||
New business volume | $ | 255.5 | $ | 225.7 | $ | 310.3 | $ | 481.2 | $ | 940.7 |
40
The Commercial Air fleet remained effectively fully utilized at June 30, 2010 and lease commitments are in place for all 19 aircraft to be delivered over the next twelve months. During the quarter, six new aircraft valued at $0.3 billion were delivered and secured debt financing was obtained for one of the planes. Lease rates for newly marketed and remarketed aircraft have mostly stabilized. Rail revenue increased as Rail fleet utilization including customer commitments to lease improved from 90% to 93%, on modest increases in activity across most major car types, and rents improved on usage-based contracts. Rail lease rates and utilization have been impacted by weak freight demand and increased velocity on the rail network which have combined to generate a broad-based surplus of rail assets. We have shortened lease terms on some remarketed leases in the current lower rate environment.
Net finance revenue improved from last quarter on higher operating lease margins and lower funding costs. Commercial Aerospace benefitted from rent collection efforts and continued strong utilization, as just one aircraft was off-lease at June 30, 2010 with remarketing efforts underway. In early August 2010 a foreign-based airline to whom we have leased airplanes filed for bankruptcy protection in its home country and the U.S. At June 30, 2010 our exposure to this customer includes equipment under operating lease of approximately $270 million. We are consulting with counsel and diligently acting to preserve our rights under the leases and the value of our aircraft. Rail benefitted from higher utilization.
The favorable earnings impact of FSA accretion is recognized over a longer time horizon from other segments given the longer asset lives. FSA in the quarter resulted in an increase to interest income of $21 million ($44 million year-to-date), a reduction to rental income on operating leases of $25 million from amortization of lease contract intangible asset ($59 million year-to-date), and a $59 million reduction to depreciation ($117 million year-to-date).
Other income includes $13.7 million of gains ($28.0 million year-to-date) on $64 million ($152 million year-to-date) of aircraft and railcar equipment sales.
2010 volume consisted primarily of the delivery of ten commercial aircraft from our existing order book, all of which were leased. See Note 9 Commitments. The 2011 order book reflects a reduction of four planes as eight A320 Family orders were replaced with four A330 orders.
Credit metrics remained comparable with the first quarter; non-accrual loans declined and no charge-offs were recorded.
Financing and leasing assets have been stable at $12.0 billion as new equipment purchases (principally aircraft) have been mitigated by depreciation.
Trade Finance
Trade Finance provides factoring, receivable management, and secured financing to businesses that operate in several industries, including apparel, textile, furniture, home furnishings and consumer electronics. Although primarily U.S.-based, Trade Finance also conducts international business in Asia, Latin America and Europe. Revenue is generated from commissions earned on factoring activities, interest on loans and other fees for services rendered.
(dollars in millions) | Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March
31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
Earnings Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 24.4 | $ | 30.5 | $ | 31.0 | $ | 54.9 | $ | 62.4 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (45.1 | ) | (38.5 | ) | (13.1 | ) | (83.6 | ) | (29.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (12.3 | ) | (33.9 | ) | (20.1 | ) | (46.2 | ) | (36.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income, commissions | 34.9 | 36.2 | 46.8 | 71.1 | 90.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
commissions | 12.1 | 9.9 | 8.9 | 22.0 | 19.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible | |||||||||||||||||||||
assets impairment charges | | | (363.8 | ) | | (363.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other expenses | (33.0 | ) | (32.0 | ) | (32.7 | ) | (65.0 | ) | (69.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for | |||||||||||||||||||||
income taxes | 3.0 | | 126.7 | 3.0 | 119.1 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (16.0 | ) | $ | (27.8 | ) | $ | (216.3 | ) | $ | (43.8 | ) | $ | (207.2 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Select Average Balances | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average finance receivables | $ | 2,637.2 | $ | 2,810.9 | $ | 5,208.6 | $ | 2,714.0 | $ | 5,357.7 | |||||||||||
Average earning assets(1) | $ | 1,701.1 | $ | 1,855.5 | $ | 2,429.1 | $ | 1,777.9 | $ | 2,582.3 | |||||||||||
Statistical Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue as a % | |||||||||||||||||||||
of AEA | -4.85 | % | -1.72 | % | 2.95 | % | -3.22 | % | 2.57 | % | |||||||||||
Factoring volume | $ | 6,307.3 | $ | 6,378.0 | $ | 8,170.3 | $ | 12,685.3 | $ | 16,516.6 |
(1) AEA is lower than AFR as it is reduced by the average credit balances for factoring clients.
41
Trade Finance factoring volume of $6.3 billion was unchanged from the first quarter. Stabilizing factors for the business included a decline in the level of client terminations versus the fourth quarter of 2009, the signing of over $700 million of annualized volume from new clients in the first half of 2010, and the resumption of $1.4 billion in annualized volume by clients that had previously been withholding business.
Net interest income decreased $12.7 million compared to the first quarter as FSA interest income accretion decreased by $3.8 million and due to increased borrowing costs. Borrowing costs this quarter include $4 million related to collateral posted to issue letters of credit on behalf of clients, which had been previously reported in Corporate and Other.
Factoring commissions were comparable with the prior quarter.
The provision for credit losses decreased $21.6 million as we rebuilt loan loss reserves in the first quarter after they had been eliminated under FSA. The second quarter gross charge-offs of $12.5 million are exclusive of $11.3 million of current quarter recoveries of pre-FSA charge-offs which are recorded as other income.
Non-accrual loans remained at a relatively low level.
Loans decreased $280 million to $2.5 billion from the end of the first quarter.
Vendor Finance
Vendor Finance partners with leading manufacturers and distributors of information technology, office products and telecommunications equipment to deliver financing and leasing solutions to end-user customers, predominantly small and medium sized businesses, globally. We also offer financing for diversified asset types in certain international markets. Vendor Finance earns revenues from interest on loans, rents on leases and fees and other revenue from leasing activities.
(dollars in millions) | Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March
31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
Earnings Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 333.2 | $ | 359.6 | $ | 224.8 | $ | 692.8 | $ | 454.8 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (190.4 | ) | (167.9 | ) | (140.5 | ) | (358.3 | ) | (284.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (111.9 | ) | (52.5 | ) | (77.4 | ) | (164.4 | ) | (158.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Rental income on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
leases | 96.1 | 110.8 | 125.2 | 206.9 | 252.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
rental income | 26.2 | 27.2 | 15.2 | 53.4 | 41.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
lease equipment | (87.8 | ) | (90.7 | ) | (114.3 | ) | (178.5 | ) | (226.8 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expenses, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
depreciation | (86.3 | ) | (86.9 | ) | (84.1 | ) | (173.2 | ) | (171.5 | ) | |||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible | |||||||||||||||||||||
assets impairment charges | | | (11.8 | ) | | (11.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for | |||||||||||||||||||||
income taxes and | |||||||||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interest | (41.2 | ) | (3.0 | ) | 27.0 | (44.2 | ) | 43.2 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (62.1 | ) | $ | 96.6 | $ | (35.9 | ) | $ | 34.5 | $ | (61.2 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Select Average Balances | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average finance receivables | $ | 6,416.9 | $ | 7,778.5 | $ | 11,222.5 | $ | 7,143.3 | $ | 11,175.2 | |||||||||||
Average operating leases | 583.2 | 646.2 | 883.9 | 614.2 | 903.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Average earning assets | 7,438.5 | 8,545.1 | 12,106.5 | 8,008.0 | 12,078.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Statistical Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue as a % | |||||||||||||||||||||
of AEA | 8.13 | % | 9.91 | % | 3.15 | % | 9.06 | % | 3.24 | % | |||||||||||
Operating lease margin as a | |||||||||||||||||||||
% of AOL | 5.69 | % | 12.42 | % | 4.93 | % | 9.25 | % | 5.67 | % | |||||||||||
New business volume | $ | 532.4 | $ | 532.3 | $ | 1,257.5 | $ | 1,064.7 | $ | 2,696.1 |
42
The results for Vendor Finance reflect the realignment of our business, our exit from less profitable programs, and our continued focus on core markets. Vendor Finance continues to see positive trends in our portfolio and the core business performed well. For the first half of 2010, Vendor Finance has originated over $1 billion in new business volume and generated $34.5 million in net income. We continued to realign our business to maximize efficiencies and optimize our portfolio in the second quarter as demonstrated by completion of the sale of our Australian and New Zealand business and the sale of non-strategic portfolios. We also reduced credit risk through the sale of certain non-strategic assets in Spain resulting in a gain on the sale of $57.4 million of assets. Continued progress was made on increasing our funding capabilities as we established a £100 million (approximately $150 million) committed funding facility for U.K. assets. This brings our total funding facilities year to date to $1.8 billion.
The decline in Vendor Finance earnings from last quarter reflected reserve strengthening related to a liquidating consumer portfolio, higher allocated interest costs and decrease in interest income due to lower asset levels. Additionally, the tax provision in the second quarter reflects amounts required to approximate the effective tax rate on a year to date basis. The increase in effective tax rate was driven by the mix of taxable income between U.S. and international sources.
New business yields remain stable. In addition, new business yields are higher than our blended portfolio yields.
New business volume was flat with last quarter at $532 million, however volume for continuing programs increased 8% from last quarter. During the second quarter we launched the Lenovo Financial Services program in North America.
Net charge-offs increased from last quarter, but on a pre-FSA basis, net charge-offs declined. Recoveries recorded in other income totaled approximately $15 million in the second quarter and approximately $19 million in the first quarter. On both a pre- and post- FSA basis, non-accrual loans decreased from March 31, 2010.
Net operating expenses were down slightly quarter over quarter with continued focus on driving efficiencies to further reduce operating expenses through continued streamlining and leveraging of our operating platforms.
Total financing and leasing assets decreased 16% sequentially, reflecting asset sales of $566 million and continued liquidation of non-core portfolios.
Consumer
Our Consumer assets and results include student lending and other principally unsecured consumer loans, all of which are running off.
(dollars in millions) | Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
Earnings Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 95.8 | $ | 92.8 | $ | 68.5 | $ | 188.6 | $ | 135.9 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (64.2 | ) | (70.9 | ) | (83.4 | ) | (135.1 | ) | (158.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (9.3 | ) | (4.5 | ) | (32.5 | ) | (13.8 | ) | (72.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income | 18.3 | 5.8 | (8.3 | ) | 24.1 | (11.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other expenses | (22.7 | ) | (21.5 | ) | (14.4 | ) | (44.2 | ) | (37.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Benefit for income taxes | |||||||||||||||||||||
and noncontrolling interest | (3.7 | ) | 3.5 | 27.7 | (0.2 | ) | 54.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 14.2 | $ | 5.2 | $ | (42.4 | ) | $ | 19.4 | $ | (88.9 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Select Average Balances | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average finance receivables | $ | 8,861.9 | $ | 9,600.0 | $ | 11,989.3 | $ | 9,192.4 | $ | 12,157.5 | |||||||||||
Average earning assets | 9,090.3 | 9,630.9 | 12,080.6 | 9,337.1 | 12,236.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Statistical Data | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue as a % | |||||||||||||||||||||
of AEA | 1.39 | % | 0.91 | % | (0.49 | )% | 1.14 | % | (0.36 | )% | |||||||||||
New business volume | $ | | $ | | $ | 0.6 | $ | | $ | 1.2 |
The student loan portfolio is running off as we ceased originating private loans in 2007 and government guaranteed loans in 2008. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, $0.6 billion of U.S. government guaranteed student loans were sold, with the proceeds used to retire related debt obligations in CIT Bank. Consumer operating losses, prior to FSA, reflect low finance revenue and credit costs. Fresh start accounting accretion improved results from the prior year.
43
Net finance revenue improvement from prior year was due to FSA accretion ($30 million and $60 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively); yield increase was offset by higher cost CIT debt issuances in 2009.
Other income reflects a gain on sale of receivables of $12 million and recoveries of accounts that were charged off prior to FSA.
Net finance revenue as a percentage of AEA improved from prior quarter and increased compared to prior year, reflecting the impact of FSA accretion income. Current quarter improvement resulted from increased yields on guaranteed student loans from rising rates while funding costs for the quarter were primarily fixed.
Net charge-offs were up slightly due to private loan performance, but exclusive of FSA, there was a decrease.
The student loan portfolio decreased 7% during the current quarter due to loan sales of $582 million and liquidations.
Delinquencies declined consistent with a seasonal improvement from year end deterioration based on customer behavior.
Corporate and Other
Corporate and other expense in 2010 is comprised primarily of expenses not allocated to segments, including provisions for severance and facilities exit activities (see Expense section for detail), losses on foreign currency exposure positions and certain tax expenses.
(dollars in millions) | Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT |
||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
June 30, 2010 |
June 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
Earnings Summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 5.0 | $ | 4.6 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 9.6 | $ | 17.2 | |||||||||||
Interest expense | (5.7 | ) | (5.0 | ) | (131.0 | ) | (10.7 | ) | (266.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (15.0 | ) | | (27.9 | ) | (15.0 | ) | (34.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Rental income on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
leases | (0.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (1.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
rental income | 15.0 | (72.2 | ) | (41.8 | ) | (57.2 | ) | 60.7 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation on operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
lease equipment | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expenses, excluding | |||||||||||||||||||||
provision for severance and | |||||||||||||||||||||
facilities exit activities and | |||||||||||||||||||||
gain (loss) on debt and debt | |||||||||||||||||||||
related derivative | |||||||||||||||||||||
extinguishments | 2.8 | 9.4 | (11.8 | ) | 12.2 | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||
Other expenses provision | |||||||||||||||||||||
for severance and facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
exit activities | (2.6 | ) | (11.9 | ) | (22.6 | ) | (14.5 | ) | (42.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expenses gain (loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||
on debt and debt related | |||||||||||||||||||||
derivative extinguishments | | | | | 139.4 | ||||||||||||||||
(Provision) benefit for | |||||||||||||||||||||
income taxes, and | |||||||||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interest | (24.8 | ) | (21.7 | ) | (480.7 | ) | (46.5 | ) | (669.5 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net loss before preferred | |||||||||||||||||||||
dividends | $ | (25.5 | ) | $ | (97.2 | ) | $ | (709.4 | ) | $ | (122.7 | ) | $ | (795.2 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income consists of interest and dividend income primarily from deposits held at other depository institutions, U.S. Treasury Securities, and Mortgage Backed Securities.
Interest expense reflects amounts not allocated to business segments. Management has allocated interest on high cost debt to each segment, which had previously been reflected in Corporate and Other.
Other income in the first quarter included losses on foreign currency exposures that were largely hedged during the second quarter.
Other expenses, excluding provision for severance and facilities exit activities and gain (loss) on debt and debt related derivative extinguishments, reflects amounts unallocated to business segments.
44
Other expenses provision for severance and facilities exit activities reflects reductions of over 50 employees. We are currently evaluating office space needs and plan to exit certain premises in the second half of 2010. Based on the alternatives being evaluated and current market conditions this evaluation could result in a charge of between $40 and $55 million in the second half of 2010.
The segments record tax expense or benefit as if they were reporting on a stand alone basis. Corporate and other results include tax adjustments to bring the tax rate to the consolidated level. The adjustment reflects the Companys NOL position.
CIT Bank
Lending activity at the bank remained limited, but is growing. The bank closed several new commercial loans this quarter. New committed loan volume rose to approximately $180 million from $35 million in the first quarter, of which $85 million was funded.
The bank reported net income of $29 million, up from $22 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Its Tier 1 Capital ratio was 59.1% and Leverage ratio was 20.6% at June 30, 2010, both up from last quarter. Total assets at June 30, 2010 were $7.6 billion, consisting of (a) $1.7 billion of cash available to fund new business, (b) $5.2 billion of loans, including $4.0 billion of consumer loans, primarily student loans and $1.2 billion of commercial loans, and (c) $0.7 billion of other assets, including $0.3 billion of investments. Deposits, primarily brokered CDs, totaled $4.7 billion, and secured debt was $1.1 billion at June 30, 2010.
The following table presents our financing and leasing assets (including assets held for sale) by segment:
June 30, 2010 |
March 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
Second Quarter % Change |
Year to Date % Change |
||||||||||
Corporate Finance | ||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 9,845.7 | $ | 11,690.3 | $ | 12,150.3 | (15.8 | )% | (19.0 | )% | ||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 104.2 | 134.9 | 137.3 | (22.8 | )% | (24.1 | )% | |||||||
Assets held for sale | 514.8 | 287.8 | 292.6 | 78.9 | % | 75.9 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financing and leasing assets | 10,464.7 | 12,113.0 | 12,580.2 | (13.6 | )% | (16.8 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Transportation Finance | ||||||||||||||
Loans | 1,671.3 | 1,817.1 | 1,853.0 | (8.0 | )% | (9.8 | )% | |||||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 10,296.9 | 10,177.5 | 10,089.2 | 1.2 | % | 2.1 | % | |||||||
Assets held for sale | 10.4 | 11.6 | 17.2 | (10.3 | )% | (39.5 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financing and leasing assets | 11,978.6 | 12,006.2 | 11,959.4 | (0.2 | )% | 0.2 | % | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Trade Finance | ||||||||||||||
Loans | 2,514.6 | 2,794.1 | 2,991.0 | (10.0 | )% | (15.9 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Vendor Finance | ||||||||||||||
Loans | 6,066.1 | 6,781.2 | 8,187.8 | (10.5 | )% | (25.9 | )% | |||||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 549.6 | 618.6 | 683.5 | (11.2 | )% | (19.6 | )% | |||||||
Assets held for sale | 18.8 | 479.8 | | (96.1 | )% | NM | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financing and leasing assets | 6,634.5 | 7,879.6 | 8,871.3 | (15.8 | )% | (25.2 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consumer | ||||||||||||||
Loans student lending | 8,721.9 | 8,863.6 | 9,584.2 | (1.6 | )% | (9.0 | )% | |||||||
Loans other | 63.6 | 79.4 | 99.5 | (19.9 | )% | (36.1 | )% | |||||||
Assets held for sale | 28.5 | 589.6 | 34.0 | (95.2 | )% | (16.2 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financing and leasing assets | 8,814.0 | 9,532.6 | 9,717.7 | (7.5 | )% | (9.3 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total financing and leasing assets | $ | 40,406.4 | $ | 44,325.5 | $ | 46,119.6 | (8.8 | )% | (12.4 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing and Leasing assets declines were driven by strategic asset sales and portfolio collections, which offset increased new origination volume and previously securitized receivables brought back on balance sheet in conjunction with the adoption of new accounting guidance in the 2010 first quarter.
45
Assets held for sale at June 30, 2010 was comprised largely of energy related assets and certain receivables in Europe (Corporate Finance). The balance at March 31, 2010 included asset based loans in Canada (Corporate Finance), certain non-strategic assets outside the U.S., primarily Australia / New Zealand (Vendor Finance), and select U.S. government guaranteed student loans (Consumer), which were completed in the second quarter. As we continue to execute on our strategic business plan, we may identify other businesses or portfolios for sale or liquidation. Upon obtaining required internal approvals, and the completion of due diligence and other procedures, these assets would be re-classified to available for sale.
Corporate Finance |
Transportation Finance |
Trade Finance(1) |
Vendor Finance |
Commercial Segments |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 12,113.0 | $ | 12,006.2 | $ | 2,794.1 | $ | 7,879.6 | $ | 34,792.9 | $ | 9,532.6 | $ | 44,325.5 | |||||||||||||
New business volume | 245.1 | 255.5 | | 532.4 | 1,033.0 | | 1,033.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loan sales | (809.1 | ) | | | (454.4 | ) | (1,263.5 | ) | (582.1 | ) | (1,845.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equipment sales | (82.0 | ) | (63.9 | ) | | (111.4 | ) | (257.3 | ) | | (257.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Collections and other | (1,830.3 | ) | (266.5 | ) | (282.4 | ) | (1,349.6 | ) | (3,728.8 | ) | (205.8 | ) | (3,934.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in finance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
receivable FSA discounts | 823.8 | 15.9 | 2.9 | 129.4 | 972.0 | 69.3 | 1,041.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change in operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FSA discounts | 4.2 | 31.4 | | 8.5 | 44.1 | | 44.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 10,464.7 | $ | 11,978.6 | $ | 2,514.6 | $ | 6,634.5 | $ | 31,592.4 | $ | 8,814.0 | $ | 40,406.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 12,580.2 | $ | 11,959.4 | $ | 2,991.0 | $ | 8,871.3 | $ | 36,401.9 | $ | 9,717.7 | $ | 46,119.6 | |||||||||||||
New business volume | 390.5 | 481.2 | | 1,064.7 | 1,936.4 | | 1,936.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loan sales | (1,008.4 | ) | | | (864.1 | ) | (1,872.5 | ) | (582.1 | ) | (2,454.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equipment sales | (132.9 | ) | (152.2 | ) | | (224.1 | ) | (509.2 | ) | | (509.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Collections and other | (2,656.9 | ) | (458.8 | ) | (488.0 | ) | (2,492.8 | ) | (6,096.5 | ) | (427.4 | ) | (6,523.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Change in finance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
receivable FSA discounts | 1,285.9 | 42.7 | 11.6 | 261.7 | 1,601.9 | 105.8 | 1,707.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change in operating lease | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FSA discounts | 6.3 | 106.3 | | 17.8 | 130.4 | | 130.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 10,464.7 | $ | 11,978.6 | $ | 2,514.6 | $ | 6,634.5 | $ | 31,592.4 | $ | 8,814.0 | $ | 40,406.4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
|||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 245.1 | $ | 145.4 | $ | 444.3 | $ | 390.5 | $ | 785.7 | ||||||
Transportation Finance | 255.5 | 225.7 | 310.3 | 481.2 | 940.7 | |||||||||||
Vendor Finance | 532.4 | 532.3 | 1,257.5 | 1,064.7 | 2,696.1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commercial Segments | 1,033.0 | 903.4 | 2,012.1 | 1,936.4 | 4,422.5 | |||||||||||
Consumer |
|
| 0.6 | | 1.2 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total | $ | 1,033.0 | $ | 903.4 | $ | 2,012.7 | $ | 1,936.4 | $ | 4,423.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New business volume trends were up sequentially as we re-start origination focusing on strategic customer relationships and committed aircraft deliveries. Origination volume in our commercial businesses was mostly from vendor programs and the delivery of six aircraft in Transportation Finance.
46
Factoring volume in our Trade Finance segment remained flat sequentially at approximately $6.3 billion.
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
|||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||
Corporate Finance | $ | 809.1 | $ | 199.3 | $ | 1,145.6 | $ | 1,008.4 | $ | 1,159.1 | ||||||
Vendor Finance | 454.4 | 409.7 | 54.6 | 864.1 | 293.2 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Commercial Segments | 1,263.5 | 609.0 | 1,200.2 | 1,872.5 | 1,452.3 | |||||||||||
Consumer | 582.1 | | 79.7 | 582.1 | 79.7 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total | $ | 1,845.6 | $ | 609.0 | $ | 1,279.9 | $ | 2,454.6 | $ | 1,532.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales activity reflected the disposition of selected loans, including asset based loans in Europe, Canada and the U.S. within Corporate Finance, certain non-strategic portfolios, including business in Australia and New Zealand, and terminated joint venture receivables in Vendor Finance as well as student loans in Consumer.
Ten Largest Accounts
Our ten largest financing and leasing asset accounts in the aggregate represented 6.5% of our total financing and leasing assets at June 30, 2010 (the largest account was 1.3%). Excluding student loans, the top ten accounts in aggregate represented 8.3% of total owned assets (largest account totaling 1.7%). In early August 2010, one of our ten largest accounts filed for bankruptcy protection. This account represented 0.7% (0.9% excluding student loans) of our total financing and leasing assets at June 30, 2010. The top ten accounts were 5.8% and 7.7% of total financing and leasing assets (excluding student loans) at December 31, 2009.
The largest accounts were in Transportation Finance (airlines and rail), Corporate Finance (energy) and Trade Finance (retail).
Operating Lease Equipment
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||
|
|
||||
Transportation Finance Aerospace(1) | $ | 6,756.4 | $ | 6,506.3 | |
Transportation Finance Rail and Other | 3,540.5 | 3,582.9 | |||
Vendor Finance | 549.6 | 683.5 | |||
Corporate Finance | 104.2 | 137.3 | |||
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 10,950.7 | $ | 10,910.0 | |
|
|
|
(1) Aerospace includes commercial, regional and corporate aircraft and equipment.
At June 30, 2010, Transportation Finance had 235 commercial aircraft on operating lease and approximately 102,000 railcars. Our commercial aircraft fleet remained effectively fully utilized at June 30, 2010, while railcar fleet utilization increased to 93% from 90% at December 31, 2009. In early August 2010 a foreign-based airline to whom we have leased airplanes filed for bankruptcy protection in its home country and the U.S. At June 30, 2010 our exposure to this customer includes equipment under operating lease of approximately $270 million. We are consulting with counsel and diligently acting to preserve our rights under the leases and the value of our aircraft.
47
Vendor Relationships
In Vendor Finance, our strategic relationships with industry-leading equipment vendors are an important origination channel for our financing and leasing activities. These vendor alliances include traditional vendor finance programs, joint ventures and profit sharing structures. Our longstanding relationships with Dell and Avaya are in multiple international markets.
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||
|
|
||||
Owned Financing and Leasing Assets | |||||
Dell | $ | 1,822.2 | $ | 2,365.3 | |
Avaya Inc. | 452.3 | 450.9 | |||
Snap-on(1) | 358.0 | 561.3 | |||
|
|
|
|
||
$ | 2,632.5 | $ | 3,377.5 | ||
|
|
|
|
||
Securitized Financing and Leasing Assets(2) | |||||
Dell | $ | | $ | 73.1 | |
Avaya Inc. | | 72.8 | |||
Snap-on(1) | | 2.2 | |||
|
|
|
|
||
$ | | $ | 148.1 | ||
|
|
|
|
(1) The joint venture agreement was terminated in January 2010.
(2) As a result of new accounting guidance relating to the consolidation of variable interest entities, the Company brought securitized assets on balance sheet on January 1, 2010.
Geographic Concentrations
The following table represents our financing and leasing assets (including assets held for sale) by obligor geography:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009(1)
|
||||||||||
Northeast | $ | 6,876.4 | 17.0 | % | $ | 7,814.3 | 16.9 | % | |||
Midwest | 6,561.3 | 16.2 | % | 7,554.9 | 16.4 | % | |||||
West | 5,808.0 | 14.4 | % | 6,446.3 | 14.0 | % | |||||
Southeast | 4,721.3 | 11.7 | % | 5,393.0 | 11.7 | % | |||||
Southwest | 3,710.4 | 9.2 | % | 4,267.0 | 9.3 | % | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total U.S. | 27,677.4 | 68.5 | % | 31,475.5 | 68.3 | % | |||||
Canada | 3,372.7 | 8.3 | % | 3,850.8 | 8.3 | % | |||||
Other international | 9,356.3 | 23.2 | % | 10,793.2 | 23.4 | % | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total | $ | 40,406.4 | 100.0 | % | $ | 46,119.5 | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) December 31, 2009 balances were conformed to exclude investments.
48
The following table summarizes both state concentrations greater than 5.0% and international concentrations in excess of 1.0% of our financing and leasing assets:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009(1) | ||||
|
|
||||
State | |||||
Texas | 7.1 | % | 7.1 | % | |
California | 6.9 | % | 6.9 | % | |
New York | 6.3 | % | 6.3 | % | |
All other states | 48.2 | % | 48.0 | % | |
|
|
|
|
||
Total U.S. | 68.5 | % | 68.3 | % | |
|
|
|
|
||
Country | |||||
Canada | 8.3 | % | 8.3 | % | |
England | 2.8 | % | 3.5 | % | |
Mexico | 2.2 | % | 2.1 | % | |
Australia | 2.0 | % | 2.2 | % | |
China | 1.7 | % | 1.7 | % | |
Germany | 1.4 | % | 1.9 | % | |
Spain | 1.1 | % | 1.1 | % | |
Brazil | 1.1 | % | 1.1 | % | |
All other countries | 10.9 | % | 9.8 | % | |
|
|
|
|
||
Total International | 31.5 | % | 31.7 | % | |
|
|
|
|
(1) December 31, 2009 balances were conformed to exclude investments.
Industry Concentrations
The following table represents financing and leasing assets (including assets held for sale) by industry of obligor:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009(1)
|
||||||||||
Industry | |||||||||||
Student lending(2) | $ | 8,721.9 | 21.6 | % | $ | 9,584.2 | 20.8 | % | |||
Commercial airlines (including regional airlines) | 7,582.3 | 18.8 | % | 7,493.3 | 16.2 | % | |||||
Manufacturing(3) | 5,188.0 | 12.8 | % | 6,260.5 | 13.6 | % | |||||
Retail(4) | 3,661.3 | 9.1 | % | 4,413.6 | 9.6 | % | |||||
Service industries | 3,503.2 | 8.7 | % | 4,160.5 | 9.0 | % | |||||
Transportation(5) | 2,219.6 | 5.5 | % | 2,293.5 | 5.0 | % | |||||
Healthcare | 2,085.4 | 5.2 | % | 2,266.7 | 4.9 | % | |||||
Finance and insurance | 1,078.0 | 2.7 | % | 1,328.5 | 2.9 | % | |||||
Energy and utilities | 1,062.5 | 2.6 | % | 1,122.2 | 2.4 | % | |||||
Communications | 948.8 | 2.3 | % | 1,312.3 | 2.8 | % | |||||
Consumer based lending non-real estate | 853.5 | 2.1 | % | 1,222.9 | 2.7 | % | |||||
Wholesaling | 543.0 | 1.3 | % | 827.5 | 1.8 | % | |||||
Other (no industry greater than 2%)(6) | 2,958.9 | 7.3 | % | 3,833.8 | 8.3 | % | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total | $ | 40,406.4 | 100.0 | % | $ | 46,119.5 | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) December 31, 2009 balances were conformed to current quarter presentation.
(2) See Student Lending section for further information.
(3) At June 30, 2010, includes manufacturers of chemical products and pharmaceuticals (1.8%), followed by food, industrial machinery, and apparel.
(4) At June 30, 2010, includes retailers of apparel (3.0%) and miscellaneous (2.5%).
(5) Includes rail, bus, over-the-road trucking industries, business aircraft and shipping.
(6) Includes commercial real estate of $224.6 million and $259.2 million at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
49
Aerospace
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||
Net Investment |
Number
|
Net Investment |
Number
|
||||||
By Region: | |||||||||
Europe | $ | 2,233.2 | 87 | $ | 1,977.3 | 78 | |||
Asia Pacific | 2,299.6 | 91 | 2,272.9 | 91 | |||||
U.S. and Canada | 964.1 | 62 | 955.4 | 68 | |||||
Latin America | 1,020.8 | 38 | 1,065.2 | 39 | |||||
Africa / Middle East | 723.2 | 19 | 692.7 | 20 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 7,240.9 | 297 | $ | 6,963.5 | 296 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
By Manufacturer: | |||||||||
Airbus | $ | 4,576.2 | 158 | $ | 4,305.5 | 150 | |||
Boeing | 2,643.5 | 139 | 2,650.7 | 146 | |||||
Other | 21.2 | | 7.3 | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 7,240.9 | 297 | $ | 6,963.5 | 296 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
By Body Type(1): | |||||||||
Narrow body | $ | 5,384.6 | 237 | $ | 5,268.1 | 238 | |||
Intermediate | 1,702.9 | 50 | 1,552.4 | 48 | |||||
Wide body | 132.2 | 10 | 135.7 | 10 | |||||
Other | 21.2 | | 7.3 | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 7,240.9 | 297 | $ | 6,963.5 | 296 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
By Product: | |||||||||
Operating lease | $ | 6,686.9 | 235 | $ | 6,418.2 | 232 | |||
Loan | 456.9 | 56 | 432.4 | 58 | |||||
Capital lease | 97.1 | 6 | 112.9 | 6 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total | $ | 7,240.9 | 297 | $ | 6,963.5 | 296 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Number of accounts | 106 | 103 | |||||||
Weighted average age of fleet (years) | 6 | 6 | |||||||
Largest customer net investment | $ | 543.1 | $ | 367.5 | |||||
Off-lease aircraft | 1 | |
(1) Narrow body are single aisle design and consist primarily of Boeing 737 and 757 series and Airbus A320 series aircraft. Intermediate body are smaller twin aisle design and consist primarily of Boeing 767 series and Airbus A330 series aircraft. Wide body are large twin aisle design and consist primarily of Boeing 747 and 777 series aircraft.
In early August 2010 a foreign-based airline to whom we have leased airplanes filed for bankruptcy protection in its home country and the U.S. At June 30, 2010 our exposure to this customer includes equipment under operating lease of approximately $270 million. We are consulting with counsel and diligently acting to preserve our rights under the leases and the value of our aircraft.
See Note 9 Commitments.
Student Lending (Student Loan Xpress or SLX)
Consumer includes our liquidating student loan portfolio of which we service approximately 70% of the portfolio in-house. See On-balance Sheet Securitization Transactions for description of related financings.
Finance receivables by product type are presented in the following table:
June 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
|
|
||||||
Consolidation loans | $ | 7,356.4 | $ | 7,559.3 | |||
Other U.S. Government guaranteed loans | 1,223.9 | 1,888.4 | |||||
Private (non-guaranteed) loans and other | 141.6 | 136.5 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total | 8,721.9 | $ | 9,584.2 | ||||
|
|
|
|
||||
Delinquencies (sixty days or more) | $ | 580.7 | $ | 658.8 | |||
|
|
|
|
||||
Top state concentrations (%) | 35 | % | 36 | % | |||
|
|
|
|
||||
Top state concentrations | California, New York, Texas, Ohio, Pennsylvania |
50
Other Exposures
At June 30, 2010, the Company had $818.7 million in unsecured counterparty receivable from a Goldman Sachs subsidiary in connection with a secured lending facility. See Other Assets below and Note 4 Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information.
The following tables summarize other assets and accrued liabilities and payables:
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured counterparty receivable(1) | $ | 818.7 | $ | 1,094.5 | |
|
|
|
|
||
Other Assets | |||||
Deposits on commercial aerospace flight equipment | $ | 619.8 | $ | 635.9 | |
Equity and debt investments | 344.7 | 373.6 | |||
Accrued interest and dividends | 172.2 | 214.7 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 114.0 | 111.3 | |||
Furniture and fixtures | 91.8 | 102.8 | |||
Retained Interests in securitizations(2) | | 139.7 | |||
Miscellaneous receivables and other assets(3) | 1,396.6 | 902.5 | |||
|
|
|
|
||
Total other assets | $ | 2,739.1 | $ | 2,480.5 | |
|
|
|
|
(1) Balance relates to receivables associated with the Goldman Sachs lending facility related to debt discount and settlements resulting from market value changes to asset-backed securities underlying the facility.
(2) Retained interests were eliminated with the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement on January 1, 2010.
(3) Balance includes approximately $440 million of funds held by a trustee related to debt prepayments processed on July 1, 2010.
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accrued Liabilities and Payables | |||||||
Equipment maintenance reserves | $ | 581.6 | $ | 552.0 | |||
Estimated valuation of aerospace commitments(1) | 535.4 | 586.6 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 458.7 | 433.2 | |||||
Accrued interest payable | 298.0 | 213.1 | |||||
Accounts payable | 261.2 | 344.8 | |||||
Security and other deposits | 197.0 | 208.6 | |||||
Current and deferred taxes | (204.1 | ) | (296.1 | ) | |||
Other liabilities | 245.5 | 169.1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total other liabilities | $ | 2,373.3 | $ | 2,211.3 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Upon adoption of FSA certain commitments, specifically aerospace commitments, were brought on balance sheet, and relate to the amounts CIT is committed to pay for future aircraft deliveries.
51
We are subject to a variety of risks that manifest themselves in the course of our business. We consider the following to be the principal forms of risk:
Credit risk (including lending, derivative counterparty, and equipment and residual risk)
Market risk (including interest rate, foreign currency and liquidity risk)
Regulatory compliance risk (compliance with laws and regulations)
Operational risk (operational errors or employee misfeasance or malfeasance)
Managing risk is essential to conducting our businesses and to our profitability. Our risk management systems and procedures are designed to identify and analyze important business risks, to set appropriate policies and limits, and to continually monitor risks and limits using reliable administrative and information systems, along with policies and programs. We continue to enhance our risk management practices, including governance, measurement and monitoring.
Our risk management policies and practices are described in detail in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
CREDIT RISK
The extension of credit, through our lending and leasing activities, is the fundamental purpose of our businesses. As such, we maintain comprehensive credit risk management practices, including credit underwriting, on-going monitoring and collections. In light of our credit performance in 2009, we are reviewing and enhancing these practices and our overall credit management infrastructure. Specifically, during the first half of 2010, we have focused on credit grading, problem loan identification, and key additions to staff, as well as short and long term information systems projects, to enhance our management and monitoring of our existing portfolio. In addition, we have realigned credit officer reporting lines and enhanced and refined our underwriting policies and underwriting guidelines to strengthen the controls on our origination activities. While these actions have resulted in significant improvements in our credit practices, several longer term initiatives, which are currently in process, related to our credit information systems and dependent downstream processes will need to be completed before we will be in line with market best practices.
Credit exposures are reviewed and monitored on an ongoing basis to identify, as early as possible, customers that are experiencing declining creditworthiness or financial difficulty. A two-tier risk system is utilized to capture and analyze credit risk based on probability of obligor default and loss given default. Our credit risk management practices also apply to counterparty credit exposures related to our use of derivatives instruments for hedging purposes.
We evaluate performance of our receivables across the organization to reduce risk concentrations. We monitor concentrations by borrower, industry, geography and equipment type. We set or modify limits as conditions warrant, to reduce credit concentrations and risk of substantial credit loss. We test for asset impairment based upon projected cash flows and relevant market data with any impairment in value charged to earnings.
We have systems, processes and expertise to manage equipment and residual risk in our leasing businesses. Our process consists of: 1) setting residual values at transaction inception; 2) systematic residual value reviews; and 3) monitoring of actual levels of residual realizations. Residual realizations, by business and product, are reviewed as part of our quarterly financial and asset quality review, both within the businesses and by senior management. Reviews for impairment are performed at least annually.
MARKET RISK
We monitor exposure to market risk by analyzing the impact of potential interest rate and foreign exchange rate changes on financial performance. We are implementing a vendor-supplied market risk management system to replace the previously used, internally developed system. We anticipate the system being fully operational by December 2010.
At June 30, 2010, the Companys loan and lease portfolio was approximately 50% floating rate, with the remainder fixed rate. Our liabilities, at June 30, 2010, were approximately 80% fixed rate based, with the remainder floating rate. While the liability restructuring materially improved our liquidity, the conversion of our liabilities to largely US dollar fixed rate debt, as part of the plan of reorganization, resulted in an asset sensitive position as our assets will re-price faster than our liabilities. Therefore, our net interest margin may increase if interest rates rise, or decrease should interest rates decline.
We evaluate and monitor risk through two primary metrics.
Margin at Risk (MAR), which measures the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates on net interest income over the subsequent twelve months.
Economic Value of Equity (EVE), which measures the net economic value of equity by assessing market value of assets, liabilities and derivatives.
52
Although we believe that these measurements provide an estimate of our interest rate sensitivity, they do not account for potential changes in credit quality, size, composition and prepayment characteristics of our balance sheet, nor do they account for other business developments that could affect net income nor for management actions that could be taken to change our risk profile.
We have historically sought to hedge our non-dollar denominated lending and leasing activities through local currency borrowings and, to the extent such borrowings were unavailable, derivative instruments (foreign currency exchange forward contracts and cross currency swaps). Additionally, we have utilized derivative instruments to hedge our net investments in foreign operations.
The Plan of Reorganization resulted in non U.S. dollar denominated debt being exchanged for U.S. dollar debt. Most of the Companys outstanding derivative instruments that hedged interest rate and foreign exchange rate risk were terminated. This resulted in the re-opening of foreign exchange exposures that had previously been hedged through former debt and derivative instruments. We have largely restored hedges to protect against these exposures (transactional and translational). Transactional exposure may result in income statement losses should related foreign currencies depreciate relative to the dollar or, conversely, income statement gains should the foreign currencies appreciate versus the dollar. Likewise our equity account may be similarly affected by related foreign currency movements as a result of translational exposures.
We maintain an active liquidity risk management and monitoring process, all of which is designed to ensure the availability of adequate cash resources and funding capacity to meet our obligations. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash, which is invested to ensure preservation of principal and immediate availability, secured funding programs, and the collection of cash flows from portfolio assets originated in the normal course of business.
We utilize a series of measurement tools to assess the level and adequacy of our liquidity position, liquidity conditions and trends. Approved liquidity limits and guidelines are monitored to facilitate the active management of our funding and liquidity position. Stress scenarios are developed and applied to measure the resiliency of the liquidity position, and to identify stress points requiring remedial action.
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE RISK
We manage regulatory compliance risk to ensure that programs and processes are in place to monitor and comply with banking, privacy, consumer and other key laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which we do business and to monitor compliance with the ethical standards of the Company. When we became a bank holding company in December 2008, we became subject to a number of regulatory requirements that previously did not apply. We are actively working to identify and close any gaps in our compliance with regulatory requirements. Corporate Compliance is working with business units to develop procedures to ensure that policies are followed on a uniform basis.
OPERATIONAL RISK
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, systems or human factors, or from external events, which may result from transaction processing errors, breaches of internal controls, fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, or business interruption due to system failures or other events. Operational risk also includes legal or regulatory actions that could arise as a result of noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations. An operational event could result in losses in the form of explicit charges, increased operational costs, financial losses, damage to reputation, or foregone opportunities.
To address these risks, CIT is developing comprehensive policies and an internal control framework designed to provide a sound operational environment and provide oversight. We have developed a loss-event database to track amounts and sources of operational losses, which will identify weaknesses and highlight corrective actions needed. Operational risk metrics are monitored by Enterprise Risk Management. Our internal audit function monitors and tests the overall effectiveness of internal control and operational systems on an ongoing basis.
53
Supplemental Funding and Liquidity Related Information
The following tables summarize significant contractual payments and projected cash collections, and contractual commitment expirations at June 30, 2010. Certain amounts in the payments and collections table are not the same as the respective balance sheet totals as this table is before FSA, in order to better reflect projected contractual payments and collections:
Total | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015+ | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Loans (2) | $ | 32,437.9 | $ | 7,558.0 | $ | 4,771.8 | $ | 4,213.9 | $ | 4,163.3 | $ | 11,730.9 | ||||||||
Operating lease rentals | 5,766.2 | 1,554.8 | 1,174.3 | 857.5 | 659.0 | 1,520.6 | ||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale (3) | 572.5 | 572.5 | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks and deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
with banks (4) | 10,666.4 | 10,666.4 | | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total cash and cash collections | 49,443.0 | 20,351.7 | 5,946.1 | 5,071.4 | 4,822.3 | 13,251.5 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Secured borrowings(5) | 13,559.0 | 3,328.2 | 1,767.3 | 1,394.5 | 1,446.2 | 5,622.8 | ||||||||||||||
Secured credit facility and expansion | ||||||||||||||||||||
credit facility | 4,464.2 | | 4,464.2 | | | | ||||||||||||||
Senior unsecured notes fixed | 259.0 | 68.6 | 36.1 | 12.6 | 3.3 | 138.4 | ||||||||||||||
Series A Notes | 21,040.1 | | | 2,104.0 | 3,156.0 | 15,780.1 | ||||||||||||||
Series B Notes | 2,149.2 | | | 214.9 | 322.4 | 1,611.9 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Long-term borrowings | 41,471.5 | 3,396.8 | 6,267.6 | 3,726.0 | 4,927.9 | 23,153.2 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Deposits | 4,596.6 | 1,505.4 | 1,097.2 | 839.9 | 713.8 | 440.3 | ||||||||||||||
Credit balances of factoring clients | 877.3 | 877.3 | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Lease rental expense | 306.7 | 34.1 | 32.3 | 30.7 | 30.1 | 179.5 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total contractual payments | 47,252.1 | 5,813.6 | 7,397.1 | 4,596.6 | 5,671.8 | 23,773.0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash and cash collections (payments) | $ | 2,190.9 | $ | 14,538.1 | $ | (1,451.0 | ) | $ | 474.8 | $ | (849.5 | ) | $ | (10,521.5 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Projected proceeds from the sale of operating lease equipment, interest revenue from finance receivables, unsecured counterparty receivable, debt interest expense and other items are excluded. Obligations relating to postretirement programs are also excluded. |
(2) |
Based upon carrying value prior to fresh start accounting adjustments, including unearned discount; amount could differ due to prepayments, extensions of credit, charge-offs and other factors. |
(3) |
Based upon managements intent to sell rather than contractual maturities of underlying assets. |
(4) |
Includes approximately $6.1 billion of cash at the bank holding company, $1.7 billion at CIT Bank, $1.7 billion at operating subsidiaries and $1.2 billion in other restricted cash. |
(5) |
Includes non-recourse secured borrowings, which are generally repaid in conjunction with the pledged receivable maturities. For student lending receivables, the repayment of both the receivable and borrowing includes a prepayment component. |
54
Total | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015+ | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Financing commitments(1) | $ | 2,864.1 | $ | 505.2 | $ | 914.2 | $ | 779.2 | $ | 516.5 | $ | 149.0 | ||||||
Aerospace and other manufacturer purchase | ||||||||||||||||||
commitments(2) | 4,349.0 | 524.5 | 994.6 | 589.9 | 647.1 | 1,592.9 | ||||||||||||
Letters of credit | 391.1 | 202.3 | 99.6 | 69.0 | 14.0 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Guarantees and acceptances | 1,241.0 | 1,232.6 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 3.2 | | ||||||||||||
Liabilities for unrecognized tax obligations(3) | 58.9 | 5.0 | 53.9 | | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total contractual commitments | $ | 8,904.1 | $ | 2,469.6 | $ | 2,064.1 | $ | 1,441.5 | $ | 1,180.8 | $ | 1,748.1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Financing commitments do not include certain unused, cancelable lines of credit to customers in connection with third-party vendor programs, which can be reduced or cancelled by CIT at any time without notice.
(2) Aerospace commitments are net of amounts on deposit with manufacturers.
(3) The balance can not be estimated past 2011; therefore the remaining balance is reflected in 2012.
Financing commitments declined from December 31, 2009 reflecting receivable sales. At June 30, 2010, unfunded commitments related to lead agented asset-based loans were $536 million. Financing commitments above exclude roughly $1.5 billion of commitments that were not available for draw due to requirements for collateral availability or covenant conditions existing at June 30, 2010. The Company monitors line utilization daily and updates liquidity forecasts and funding plans.
At June 30, 2010 substantially all financing commitments were senior facilities, with approximately 49% secured by equipment or other assets and the remainder relying upon cash-flow or enterprise value. The vast majority of commitments are syndicated transactions. CIT is the lead agent in 37% of the facilities. Most of our undrawn and available financing commitments are in Corporate Finance with an average facility balance of $4.8 million. The top ten undrawn commitments totaled $419 million.
Secured financings have been our primary source of funding since mid-2007. These secured financing transactions do not meet accounting requirements for sale treatment and are recorded as non-recourse secured borrowings, with the assets remaining on-balance sheet. The debt associated with these transactions is collateralized by receivables or collateral values of the assets. Certain related cash balances are restricted.
See Note 3 Long-Term Borrowings, and Note 12 Summarized Financial Information of Subsidiaries.
Credit Facility and Expansion Credit Facility
On July 20, 2009, CIT entered into a $3 billion Credit Facility with Barclays Bank PLC and other lenders. The Credit Facility is secured by a perfected first priority lien on substantially all unencumbered assets of the Borrowers and Guarantors, which includes a substantial amount of finance and leasing assets of our U.S. operating subsidiaries, 65% of the voting and 100% of the non-voting stock of first-tier foreign subsidiaries, 100% of the stock of CIT Aerospace International (except one nominee share) and between 49% and 65% of certain other non-U.S., non-regulated subsidiaries.
On October 28, 2009, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries amended and restated the agreement evidencing the Credit Facility to provide for an Expansion Credit Facility to expand the commitments by $4.5 billion. The amounts outstanding under the Expansion Credit Facility are secured by substantially the same assets as those securing the Credit Facility, including any additional collateral which became available as a result of the Companys repayment of certain refinanced indebtedness.
The first lien facilities are subject to a fair value collateral coverage covenant of 2.5x the outstanding loan balance tested quarterly and upon financing, disposition or release of certain collateral. At June 30, 2010, the coverage ratio was 4.3x.
As of June 30, 2010 we have repaid more than $3 billion of those facilities, $750 million in March 2010, $1.5 billion in April 2010 and $786 million in June 2010. We repaid approximately $455 million just after the second quarter-end, leaving $4 billion of the original $7.5 billion first lien debt outstanding.
55
On July 27th, we announced that we intend to explore refinancing the first lien facilities with investors. Our plan is to repay approximately $1 billion using cash and refinance the remaining $3 billion through a new first lien facility with an expected term of five years at a rate of LIBOR plus 4.5%, with a 1.75% floor. Necessary lender commitments were received on August 3rd and we expect the transaction to close the week of August 9th.
Series A and B Notes
The Series A Notes and Series B Notes are secured by second-priority (second lien) security interests in substantially all the assets securing the Facilities. The Series B Notes are further secured by Delaware Fundings pledge of inter-company notes issued by CIT Financial Ltd., which are the primary assets of Delaware Funding.
The Series A and Series B Indentures likewise limit the ability of the Company, Delaware Funding and the Companys restricted subsidiaries to make certain payments or investments, incur indebtedness (including guarantees), issue preferred stock, incur liens, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, pay dividends, sell assets, and enter into transactions with affiliates.
See Note 3 Long-Term Borrowings for additional terms of the facilities and Note 12 Summarized Financial Information of Subsidiaries for condensed consolidating financial statements of the Guarantors.
Secured Borrowings
At June 30, 2010, we had secured borrowings of $12.4 billion comprised largely of securitization financings. This amount declined from $13.2 billion and $14.3 billion at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, as borrowings on the new facilities described below were more than offset by repayments on existing structures corresponding to receivable runoff.
At June 30, 2010, a total of $4,092.5 million, after fresh start accounting, of financing and leasing assets, comprised of $2,325.1 million in Corporate Finance, $625.7 million in Consumer and $1,141.7 million in commercial aerospace in Transportation Finance, were pledged in conjunction with $2,673.8 million in secured debt issued to investors under the $2,125 million Goldman Sachs International (GSI) facility. Amounts funded under the facility, net of cash collateral posted to GSI, totaled $1,667.5 million at June 30, 2010, as $818.7 million reported as unsecured counterparty receivable is owed to CIT from GSI for debt discount, return of cash collateral posted to GSI and settlements resulting from market value changes to asset-backed securities underlying the structure. Collateral amounts required under this agreement will fluctuate with market values of the underlying securities. Actual terms of the facility, including facility usage and collateral coverage are measured on a pre-FSA basis.
On March 11, 2010, CIT closed a $667 million securitization, backed by a pool of equipment leases originated by CIT Vendor Finance. The Class A Notes constitute eligible collateral under the Federal Reserve Bank of New Yorks Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF). The weighted average fixed coupon was 3.31%, which represents a weighted average credit spread of 2.20% over benchmark swap rates. The securitization had a net advance rate of 89.5%.
On March 30, 2010, CIT closed a $1 billion committed U.S. Vendor Finance conduit with Barclays Bank PLC as Administrative Agent and three additional banks as committed lenders. The revolving period expires in March 2011 and the final maturity is in 2018.
On June 24, 2010, CIT closed a £100 million committed UK Vendor Finance conduit with Deutsche Bank as Administrative Agent. The revolving period expires June 2011.
On June 25, 2010, CIT closed a $650 million committed Trade Finance conduit with Citibank, N.A. as Administrative Agent and one additional bank as committed lenders. The revolving period expires June 2011.
Cash Sweep and Required Cash Sweep Payments
Under the terms of the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company is required to use certain cash collections to repay the Credit Facility and the Expansion Facility (the First Lien Facilities) and Series A Notes and Series B Notes (Second Lien Notes) on an accelerated basis (the Cash Sweep). The Company may use amounts in the Cash Sweep Accounts for certain designated purposes.
During the second quarter and just after the quarter close, CIT voluntarily used approximately $926 million of Cash Sweep balances to prepay first lien facilities. The cash in Cash Sweep account had a zero balance at the end of the quarter.
The Cash Sweep is described in detail in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Debt Ratings
Following the Companys emergence from bankruptcy, our debt ratings were reestablished in April and May of 2010 as explained below.
On April 29, 2010, Standard & Poors Ratings Services (S&P) assigned a B+/B counterparty credit rating to CIT with a positive outlook. At the same time, S&P assigned a BB rating to the companys First Lien Facilities, a B+ rating to the companys Second Lien Notes and a B rating to the unsecured debt.
On May 18, 2010 DBRS assigned a B (high) credit rating to CIT with a positive outlook. DBRS also assigned a BB (high) rating to the First Lien Facilities, a B (high) and BB (low) rating to the Second Lien Notes, respectively, and a B rating to the unsecured debt.
56
On May 21, 2010 Moodys Investors Service (Moodys) assigned a B3 credit rating to CIT with a stable outlook. Moodys also assigned ratings of B1, B3 and Caa1 to the Companys First Lien Facilities, Second Lien Notes and unsecured debt, respectively.
The debt ratings listed above remained unchanged as of August 2, 2010.
As a BHC, capital adequacy is based upon risk-weighted asset ratios in accordance with quantitative measures established by the Federal Reserve. Under these guidelines, certain commitments and off-balance sheet transactions are assigned asset equivalent balances, and together with on-balance sheet assets, are divided into risk categories, each of which is assigned a risk weighting ranging from 0% (for example U.S. Treasury Bonds) to 100% (for example commercial loans). The reconciliation of balance sheet assets to risk-weighted assets at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is presented below:
June 30, 2010 |
December 31, 2009(1) |
|||||||
Balance sheet assets | $ | 54,916.8 | $ | 60,029.1 | ||||
Risk weighting adjustments to balance sheet assets(2) | (16,508.2 | ) | (15,846.4 | ) | ||||
Off balance sheet items(3) | 8,215.7 | 10,170.0 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Risk-weighted assets | $ | 46,624.3 | $ | 54,352.7 | ||||
|
|
(1) Amounts reclassified to conform to the current quarters presentation.
(2) 2009 includes risk weighting for retained interests in securitized assets to reflect the associated off-balance sheet assets at December 31, 2009.
(3) Primarily reflects commitments to purchase aircraft and for unused lines of credit and letters of credit. See Note 8 Regulatory Capital for more information.
Tier 1 Capital
|
CIT June 30, 2010 |
CIT March 31, 2010(1) |
CIT December 31, 2009(1) |
||||||||
Total stockholders equity | $ | 8,632.4 | $ | 8,527.8 | $ | 8,400.0 | |||||
Effect of certain items in accumulated other | |||||||||||
comprehensive loss excluded from Tier 1 Capital | (1.7 | ) | (1.4 | ) | | ||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted total equity | 8,630.7 | 8,526.4 | 8,400.0 | ||||||||
Less: Goodwill | (239.4 | ) | (239.4 | ) | (239.4 | ) | |||||
Disallowed intangible assets | (168.5 | ) | (201.5 | ) | (225.1 | ) | |||||
Investment in certain subsidiaries | | | (2.8 | ) | |||||||
Other Tier 1 components(2) | (88.5 | ) | (93.4 | ) | (98.5 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | 8,134.3 | 7,992.1 | 7,834.2 | ||||||||
Tier 2 Capital | |||||||||||
Qualifying reserve for credit losses | 337.8 | 180.8 | | ||||||||
Other Tier 2 components(3) | 1.0 | 0.8 | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total qualifying capital | $ | 8,473.1 | $ | 8,173.7 | $ | 7,834.2 | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Risk-weighted assets | $ | 46,624.3 | $ | 50,788.3 | $ | 54,352.7 | |||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 17.4 | % | 15.7 | % | 14.4 | % | |||||
Total Capital Ratio | 18.2 | % | 16.1 | % | 14.4 | % |
(1) | Amounts reclassified to conform to the current quarters presentation. |
(2) |
Includes the portion of net deferred tax assets that does not qualify for inclusion in Tier 1 capital based on the capital guidelines and the Tier 1 capital charge for nonfinancial equity investments. |
(3) |
Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values. |
57
Regulatory capital guidelines are based on the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel I). We compute capital ratios in accordance with Federal Reserve capital guidelines for assessing adequacy of capital. To be well capitalized, a BHC generally must maintain Tier 1 and Total Capital Ratios of at least 6% and 10%, respectively. The Federal Reserve Board also has established minimum guidelines. The minimum ratios are: Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 4.0%, Total Capital Ratio of 8.0% and Leverage Ratio of 4.0%. In order to be considered a well capitalized depository institution under FDIC guidelines, CIT Bank must maintain a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital Ratio of at least 10%, and a Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of at least 5%.
Upon becoming a BHC, we committed to maintain capital ratios in excess of the well capitalized levels. CIT committed to maintain a Total Capital Ratio of at least 13% and CIT Bank committed to maintain a Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio of at least 15%.
At the above periods, both CIT and CIT Bank capital ratios were in excess of required and committed ratios.
There have been no significant changes to the methodologies and processes used in developing estimates relating to these items from what was described in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Dodd-Frank Act
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law (the Dodd-Frank Act). The Dodd-Frank Act implements a variety of far-reaching changes and has been called the most sweeping reform of the financial services industry since the 1930s. Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act could affect our ability to conduct our business, particularly with respect to the cost of capital, including:
Imposition of higher prudential standards, including more stringent risk-based capital, leverage, liquidity and risk- management requirements, and numerous other requirements on systemically significant institutions, defined to include, among other things, all bank holding companies with assets of at least $50 billion (which would include CIT);
Imposition of additional costs and fees, including fees to be set by the Federal Reserve and charged to systemically significant institutions to cover the cost of regulating such institutions and any FDIC assessment made to cover the costs of any regular or special examination of CIT Bank or its affiliates;
Establishment of a consumer financial protection bureau with broad authority to implement new consumer protection regulations and to examine and enforce compliance with federal consumer laws;
Application to bank holding companies of regulatory capital requirements similar to those applied to banks, which requirements exclude, on a phase-out basis, all trust preferred securities and cumulative preferred from Tier 1 capital (except for TARP Preferred securities, which will continue to qualify as Tier 1 capital);
Prohibition of proprietary trading and limitation of the sponsorship of, and investment in, hedge funds and private equity funds by banking entities, including bank holding companies, such as CIT;
Establishment of new derivatives standards to require greater transparency in over-the-counter derivatives markets and prohibiting insured depository institutions from conducting significant swaps-related activities; and
Requiring anyone who organizes or initiates an asset-backed security transaction to retain a portion of the credit risk.
Requiring the SEC, the Federal Reserve and other agencies to jointly issue rules requiring enhanced reporting and regulation of incentive-based compensation structures at regulated entities, including bank holding companies, banks, registered broker-dealers, and registered investment advisors; and
Expanding the coverage and scope of the regulations that limit affiliate transactions within a banking organization.
Many provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act remain subject to regulatory rule-making and implementation, the effects of which are not yet known, including mandates requiring the Federal Reserve to establish compensation guidelines covering regulated financial institutions and standards for determining whether interchange fees charged by certain financial institutions are reasonable and proportional to the costs incurred by such institution. In addition, further legislative and regulatory changes are still being considered, including the so called bank tax on institutions with greater than $50 billion in assets, such as CIT.
The provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and any rules adopted to implement those provisions as well as any additional legislative or regulatory changes may impact the profitability of our business activities, require we change certain of our business practices, materially affect our business model or affect retention of key personnel, require us to raise additional regulatory capital, including additional Tier 1 capital, and could expose us to additional costs (including increased compliance costs). These and other changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes and may adversely affect our ability to conduct our business as previously conducted or our results of operations or financial condition.
58
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee) provides a forum for bank supervisory authorities from over two dozen countries to cooperate on banking supervisory matters. The regulatory guidelines currently applicable to bank holding companies are based on the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee (Basel I). We compute and report our capital ratios in accordance with the Basel (I) requirements for the purpose of assessing our capital adequacy. Bank regulators are phasing in revised regulatory capital guidelines based on the Revised Framework for the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards issued by the Basel Committee (Basel II).
Recent proposals published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee), if adopted, could lead to significantly higher capital requirements, higher capital charges and more restrictive leverage and liquidity ratios for financial institutions in general. In July and December 2009, the Basel Committee published proposals relating to, respectively, enhanced capital requirements for market risk and new capital and liquidity risk requirements for banks. If adopted, these proposals would generally impose more restrictive eligibility requirements for Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital, including a minimum ratio of common equity to risk-based assets; more deductions from and adjustments to the common equity component of Tier 1 capital; increased capital charges for various assets and risk exposures; a more restrictive leverage ratio (capital to total assets) than currently applies to U.S. banks and bank holding companies; counter-cyclical measures such as provisioning for expected rather than incurred credit losses and restrictions on certain distributions such as dividends and discretionary bonus payments to the extent a bank or bank holding company does not maintain additional capital above the minimum requirements; and two new liquidity ratios designed to ensure that a bank or bank holding company has more highly liquid assets than expected net outflows in stressed conditions and access to more stable funding needed in stressed conditions.
59
At or for the Quarters Ended
|
At or for the Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Select Statement of Operations Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 179.9 | $ | 211.2 | $ | (19.1 | ) | $ | 391.1 | $ | (36.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | (260.7 | ) | (186.6 | ) | (588.5 | ) | (447.3 | ) | (1,123.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total other income | 750.3 | 550.4 | 274.7 | 1,300.7 | 937.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total other expenses(1) | (456.0 | ) | (435.4 | ) | (1,272.9 | ) | (891.4 | ) | (1,717.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(attributable) to common stockholders | $ | 142.1 | $ | 97.3 | $ | (1,679.4 | ) | $ | 239.4 | $ | (2,082.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Per Common Share Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) per share from | |||||||||||||||||||||||
continuing operations diluted | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.49 | $ | (4.30 | ) | $ | 1.19 | $ | (5.34 | ) | |||||||||||
Book value per common share | $ | 43.11 | $ | 42.63 | $ | 7.48 | |||||||||||||||||
Tangible book value per common share | $ | 41.07 | $ | 40.43 | $ | 7.48 | |||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average common | |||||||||||||||||||||||
stockholders equity | 6.60 | % | 4.60 | % | (161.3 | )% | 5.58 | % | (90.0 | )% | |||||||||||||
Net finance revenue as a percentage of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
average earning assets | 4.03 | % | 4.09 | % | 1.10 | % | 4.06 | % | 1.11 | % | |||||||||||||
Return on average total assets | 1.01 | % | 0.66 | % | (9.08 | )% | 0.83 | % | (5.48 | )% | |||||||||||||
Total ending equity to total ending | |||||||||||||||||||||||
assets | 15.72 | % | 14.69 | % | 8.61 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Selected Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans including receivables pledged | $ | 28,883.2 | $ | 32,025.7 | $ | 48,730.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (337.8 | ) | (180.8 | ) | (1,538.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Operating lease equipment, net | 10,950.7 | 10,931.0 | 13,380.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets, net | 407.9 | 440.9 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total cash | 10,666.4 | 10,015.6 | 4,467.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | 54,916.8 | 58,060.5 | 71,019.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total long-term borrowings and deposits | 42,985.4 | 46,222.7 | 59,466.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total common stockholders equity | 8,632.4 | 8,527.8 | 2,932.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total equity | 8,633.9 | 8,529.0 | 6,118.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Quality(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans as a percentage of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
finance receivables | 7.11 | % | 6.03 | % | 4.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs as a percentage of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
average finance receivables | 1.37 | % | 0.49 | % | 2.81 | % | 0.91 | % | 2.60 | % | |||||||||||||
Reserve for credit losses as a | |||||||||||||||||||||||
percentage of finance receivables | 1.17 | % | 0.56 | % | 3.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Financial Ratios | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | 17.4 | % | 15.7 | % | 8.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total Risk-based Capital | 18.2 | % | 16.1 | % | 12.8 | % |
(1) 2009 includes goodwill and intangible assets impairment charges of $692.4 million.
(2) 2010 metrics include the impact of FSA. See Credit Metrics for additional information.
60
CIT
|
CIT
|
Predecessor CIT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
March 31, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Interest
|
Average Rate (%) |
Average Balance |
Interest
|
Average Rate (%) |
Average Balance |
Interest
|
Average Rate (%) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks | $ | 9,814.5 | $ | 4.6 | 0.19 | % | $ | 9,498.6 | $ | 3.8 | 0.16 | % | $ | 4,826.4 | $ | 6.3 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||||||
Investments(2) | 348.5 | 1.7 | 1.95 | % | 348.3 | 1.7 | 1.95 | % | 475.0 | 1.7 | 1.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans and leases (including | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
held for sale)(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | 25,769.8 | 771.3 | 12.38 | % | 27,891.0 | 811.1 | 12.00 | % | 41,946.2 | 438.4 | 4.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. | 5,678.5 | 215.9 | 15.25 | % | 6,643.7 | 232.4 | 14.03 | % | 8,519.6 | 168.1 | 7.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans and leases(3) | 31,448.3 | 987.2 | 12.91 | % | 34,534.7 | 1,043.5 | 12.40 | % | 50,465.8 | 606.5 | 5.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets / | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
interest income(3)(4) | 41,611.3 | 993.5 | 9.75 | % | 44,381.6 | 1,049.0 | 9.64 | % | 55,767.2 | 614.5 | 4.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease equipment, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
net(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Operating lease | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment, net(5) | 5,002.2 | 82.3 | 6.58 | % | 4,982.5 | 102.4 | 8.22 | % | 6,327.0 | 67.6 | 4.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. operating lease | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment, net(5) | 5,971.3 | 158.4 | 10.61 | % | 5,962.7 | 142.3 | 9.55 | % | 6,913.3 | 119.3 | 6.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating lease | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
equipment, net(5) | 10,973.5 | 240.7 | 8.77 | % | 10,945.2 | 244.7 | 8.94 | % | 13,240.3 | 186.9 | 5.65 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets (3) | $ | 52,584.8 | $ | 1,234.2 | 9.55 | % | $ | 55,326.8 | $ | 1,293.7 | 9.50 | % | $ | 69,007.5 | $ | 801.4 | 4.83 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non interest earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash due from banks | 255.7 | 371.5 | 331.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (241.6 | ) | (84.3 | ) | (1,366.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
All other non-interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
earning assets | 3,546.6 | 3,601.9 | 6,006.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Average Assets | $ | 56,145.5 | $ | 59,215.9 | $ | 73,978.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | 4,635.3 | $ | 28.9 | 2.49 | % | $ | 4,921.3 | $ | 30.1 | 2.45 | % | $ | 4,276.9 | $ | 37.4 | 3.50 | % | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 39,595.0 | 784.7 | 7.93 | % | 42,588.9 | 807.7 | 7.59 | % | 56,588.3 | 596.2 | 4.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
liabilities | $ | 44,230.3 | $ | 813.6 | 7.36 | % | $ | 47,510.2 | $ | 837.8 | 7.05 | % | $ | 60,865.2 | $ | 633.6 | 4.16 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. credit balances of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
factoring clients | 851.5 | 850.1 | 2,657.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. credit balances of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
factoring clients | 16.2 | 16.7 | 32.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
noncontrolling interests and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
stockholders equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 2,426.0 | 2,373.1 | 3,257.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 1.2 | 1.0 | 43.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity | 8,620.3 | 8,464.8 | 7,123.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Average Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Stockholders Equity | $ | 56,145.5 | $ | 59,215.9 | $ | 73,978.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue spread | 2.19 | % | 2.45 | % | 0.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of non-interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bearing sources | 1.06 | % | 0.90 | % | 0.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue/yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
on earning assets(3) | $ | 420.6 | 3.25 | % | $ | 455.9 | 3.35 | % | $ | 167.8 | 1.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
CIT | Predecessor CIT | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Average Rate (%) |
Average Balance |
Average Rate (%) |
|||||||||||||||||
Interest | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks | $ | 9,650.5 | $ | 8.4 | 0.17 | % | $ | 5,748.2 | $ | 16.0 | 0.56 | % | ||||||||
Investments(2) | 349.6 | 3.4 | 1.95 | % | 474.3 | 3.0 | 1.27 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans and leases (including held for | ||||||||||||||||||||
sale)(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | 26,810.7 | 1,582.4 | 12.19 | % | 42,804.2 | 900.1 | 4.49 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. | 6,123.3 | 448.3 | 14.68 | % | 8,491.4 | 335.0 | 7.92 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total loans and leases(3) | 32,934.0 | 2,030.7 | 12.66 | % | 51,295.6 | 1,235.1 | 5.08 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total interest earning assets / interest | ||||||||||||||||||||
income(3)(4) | 42,934.1 | 2,042.5 | 9.71 | % | 57,518.1 | 1,254.1 | 4.58 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating lease equipment, net(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Operating lease equipment, net(5) | 4,999.3 | 184.7 | 7.39 | % | 6,280.5 | 151.4 | 4.82 | % | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. operating lease equipment, | ||||||||||||||||||||
net(5) | 5,963.2 | 300.7 | 10.09 | % | 6,772.1 | 228.7 | 6.75 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total operating lease equipment, net(5) | 10,962.5 | 485.4 | 8.86 | % | 13,052.6 | 380.1 | 5.82 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets (3) | $ | 53,896.6 | $ | 2,527.9 | 9.53 | % | $ | 70,570.7 | $ | 1,634.2 | 4.82 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Non interest earning assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash due from banks | 313.2 | 409.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (160.4 | ) | (1,255.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
All other non-interest earning assets | 3,577.0 | 6,261.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total Average Assets | $ | 57,626.4 | $ | 75,986.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Average Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | 4,777.5 | $ | 59.0 | 2.47 | % | $ | 3,352.6 | $ | 61.8 | 3.69 | % | ||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 41,042.4 | 1,592.4 | 7.76 | % | 58,939.7 | 1,228.9 | 4.17 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 45,819.9 | $ | 1,651.4 | 7.21 | % | $ | 62,292.3 | $ | 1,290.7 | 4.14 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. credit balances of factoring | ||||||||||||||||||||
clients | 848.8 | 2,674.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. credit balances of factoring | ||||||||||||||||||||
clients | 16.5 | 35.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing liabilities, noncontrolling interests and stockholders equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 2,395.5 | 3,552.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 1.1 | 43.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity | 8,544.6 | 7,388.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total Average Liabilities and | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity | $ | 57,626.4 | $ | 75,986.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net revenue spread | 2.32 | % | 0.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Impact of non-interest bearing sources | 0.99 | % | 0.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue/yield on earning | ||||||||||||||||||||
assets(3) | $ | 876.5 | 3.31 | % | $ | 343.5 | 1.01 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The average balances presented are derived based on month end balances during the year. Tax exempt income was not significant in any of the years presented. |
(2) |
Investments are included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and do not include retained interests in securitizations as revenues from these are part of other income. Average yields reflect average historical cost. |
(3) |
The rate presented is calculated net of average credit balances for factoring clients. |
(4) |
Non-accrual loans and related income are included in the respective categories. |
(5) |
Operating lease rental income is a significant source of revenue; therefore, we have presented the net revenues. |
62
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We consider accounting estimates relating to the following to be critical in applying our accounting policies:
Assumptions and estimates recorded upon adoption of fresh start accounting
Reserve for Credit Losses
Impaired Loans
Fair Value Determinations
Lease Residual Values
Liabilities and Tax Reserves
There have been no significant changes to the methodologies and processes used in developing estimates relating to these items from what was described in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Internal Controls Committee is responsible for monitoring and improving internal controls and overseeing the internal controls attestation mandated by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SARBOX). The Committee, which is chaired by the Controller, and includes the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the Executive Vice President, Internal Audit and other senior executives in finance, legal, risk management and information technology. See Item 4 Controls and Procedures.
63
The SEC adopted regulations that apply to public disclosure or release of material information that includes a non-GAAP financial measure. The accompanying Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk contain certain non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures are meant to provide additional information and insight regarding operating results and financial position of the business and in certain cases to provide financial information that is presented to rating agencies and other users of financial information. These measures are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, GAAP and may be different from or inconsistent with non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. See footnotes below the tables for additional explanation of non-GAAP measurements.
December 31, 2009 |
|||||||
June 30, 2010 |
|||||||
Earning assets(1) | |||||||
Total financing and leasing portfolio assets | $ | 40,406.4 | $ | 46,119.6 | |||
Credit balances of factoring clients | (877.3 | ) | (892.9 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
||||
Earning assets | $ | 39,529.1 | $ | 45,226.7 | |||
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | March 31, | Predecessor CIT June 30, |
June 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | Predecessor CIT 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total net revenues(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 993.5 | $ | 1,049.0 | $ | 614.5 | $ | 2,042.5 | $ | 1,254.1 | |||||||||||
Rental income on operating leases | 419.7 | 418.2 | 473.5 | 837.9 | 948.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Finance revenue | 1,413.2 | 1,467.2 | 1,088.0 | 2,880.4 | 2,202.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (813.6 | ) | (837.8 | ) | (633.6 | ) | (1,651.4 | ) | (1,290.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Depreciation on operating lease equipment | (179.0 | ) | (173.5 | ) | (286.6 | ) | (352.5 | ) | (568.6 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net finance revenue | 420.6 | 455.9 | 167.8 | 876.5 | 343.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income | 330.6 | 132.2 | (198.8 | ) | 462.8 | (10.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total net revenues | $ | 751.2 | $ | 588.1 | $ | (31.0 | ) | $ | 1,339.3 | $ | 332.7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Earning assets are utilized in certain revenue and earnings ratios. Earning assets are net of credit balances of factoring clients. This net amount represents the amounts we fund.
(2) Total net revenues are the combination of net finance revenues and other income and is an aggregation of all sources of revenue for the Company. Total net revenues is used by management to monitor business performance.
Certain statements contained in this document are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking and the words anticipate, believe, could, expect, estimate, forecast, intend, plan, potential, project, target and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements contained herein, in press releases, written statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings, webcasts, phone calls and conference calls, concerning our operations, economic performance and financial condition are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements are included, for example, in the discussions about:
our liquidity risk and capital management, including our credit ratings, our liquidity plan, and the potential transactions designed to enhance our liquidity,
our plans to change our funding mix and to access new sources of funding to broaden our use of deposit taking,
our plans to enhance liquidity and capital,
our credit risk management and credit quality,
our asset/liability risk management,
accretion and amortization of fresh start accounting adjustments,
our funding, borrowing costs and net finance revenue,
64
our capital, leverage and credit ratings,
our operational risks, including success of build-out initiatives, acquisitions and divestitures,
legal risks,
our growth rates,
our commitments to extend credit or purchase equipment, and
how we may be affected by legal proceedings
All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results, performance or achievements. Also, forward-looking statements are based upon managements estimates of fair values and of future costs, using currently available information. Therefore, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in those statements. Factors, in addition to those disclosed in Risk Factors, that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
capital markets liquidity,
risks of and/or actual economic slowdown, downturn or recession,
industry cycles and trends,
uncertainties associated with risk management, including credit, prepayment, asset/liability, interest rate and currency risks,
estimates and assumptions used to fair value the balance sheet in accordance with fresh start accounting and actual variation between the estimated fair values and the realized values,
adequacy of reserves for credit losses,
risks inherent in changes in market interest rates and quality spreads,
funding opportunities, deposit taking capabilities and borrowing costs,
risks that the restructuring of the Companys capital structure did not result in sufficient additional capital or improved liquidity,
risks that the Company will be unable to comply with the terms of the Written Agreement with the Reserve Bank or the Cease and Desist Orders of the FDIC and UDFI,
conditions and/or changes in funding markets and our access to such markets, including commercial paper, secured and unsecured term debt and the asset- backed securitization markets,
risks associated with the value and recoverability of leased equipment and lease residual values,
application of fair value accounting in volatile markets,
application of goodwill accounting in a recessionary economy,
changes in laws or regulations governing our business and operations,
changes in competitive factors,
demographic trends,
future acquisitions and dispositions of businesses or asset portfolios, and
regulatory changes and/or developments.
Any or all of our forward-looking statements here or in other publications may turn out to be wrong, and there are no guarantees about our performance. We do not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking statement for any reason.
There have been no changes to the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys second quarter of 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that such procedures are effective as of June 30, 2010.
65
Part TwoOther Information
SECURITIES CLASS ACTION
In July and August 2008, two putative class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the New York District Court) on behalf of CITs pre-reorganization stockholders against CIT, its former Chief Executive Officer and its former Chief Financial Officer. In August 2008, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the New York District Court by a holder of CIT-PrZ equity units against CIT, its former CEO, former CFO and former Controller and members of its current and former Board of Directors. In May 2009, the Court consolidated these three shareholder actions into a single action and appointed Pensioenfonds Horeca & Catering as Lead Plaintiff to represent the proposed class, which consists of all acquirers of CIT common stock and PrZ preferred stock from December 12, 2006 through March 5, 2008, who allegedly were damaged, including acquirers of CIT-PrZ preferred stock pursuant to the October 17, 2007 offering of such preferred stock.
In July 2009, the Lead Plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act) and the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 Act). Specifically, it is alleged that the Company, its former CEO, former CFO, former Controller, and a former Vice Chairman violated Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act by allegedly making false and misleading statements and omissions regarding CITs subprime home lending and student lending businesses. The allegations relating to the Companys student lending business are based upon the assertion that the Company failed to account in its financial statements or, in the case of the preferred stockholders, its registration statement and prospectus, for private loans to students of a helicopter pilot training school, which it is alleged were highly unlikely to be repaid and should have been written off. The allegations relating to the Companys home lending business are based on the assertion that the Company failed to fully disclose the risks in the Companys portfolio of subprime mortgage loans. The Lead Plaintiff also alleges that the Company, its former CEO, former CFO and former Controller and those current and former Directors of the Company who signed the registration statement in connection with the October 2007 CIT-PrZ preferred offering violated the 1933 Act by making false and misleading statements concerning the Companys student lending business as described above.
Pursuant to a Notice of Dismissal filed on November 24, 2009, CIT Group Inc. was dismissed as a defendant from the consolidated securities action. On June 10, 2010, the Court denied the individual defendants motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. The action will continue as to the remaining defendants and CITs obligation to defend and indemnify such defendants continues. Plaintiffs seek, among other relief, unspecified damages and interest. CIT believes the allegations in these complaints are without merit.
PILOT TRAINING SCHOOL BANKRUPTCY
In February 2008, a helicopter pilot training school (the Pilot School) filed for bankruptcy and ceased operating. Student Loan Xpress, Inc. (SLX), a subsidiary of CIT engaged in the student lending business, had marketed and acquired private (non-government guaranteed) loans made to approximately 2,600 students of the Pilot School, which totaled approximately $196.8 million in principal and accrued interest as of December 31, 2007. SLX ceased marketing and acquiring new loans made to students of this school in September 2007.
After the Pilot School filed for bankruptcy and ceased operations, SLX voluntarily placed those students who were attending school at the time of the closure in grace such that no payments under their loans have been required to be made and no interest on their loans has been accruing. Multiple lawsuits, including putative class action lawsuits and collective actions, have been filed against SLX and other lenders alleging, among other things, violations of state consumer protection laws. SLX participated in a mediation with several lawyers representing student borrowers, and, ultimately, reached an agreement pursuant to which a nationwide class of students who were in attendance at the Pilot School when it closed will be formed for the purposes of settlement only, and their claims against SLX will be resolved. In November, 2009, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida preliminarily approved the proposed settlement agreement, stayed other similar litigation and set a number of dates, including March 22, 2010 as the date the final approval hearing would be held. Of the nearly 2,200 loans covered by the settlement, objections to the settlement were filed with respect to fewer than 3% of the loans and opt-outs were received with respect to fewer than 5% of the loans. The Attorneys General of several states also engaged in a review of the impact of the Pilot Schools closure on the student borrowers and any possible role of SLX. SLX cooperated in the review and reached agreement with twelve state Attorneys General, pursuant to which, among other things, the Attorneys General support the class settlement that has been preliminarily approved by the court. Following the March 22, 2010 hearing, the Court reserved decision on the final approval of the settlement.
SLX also completed a settlement of a mass action commenced by Pilot School students in Georgia, which is binding upon 37 SLX borrowers.
Most recently, approximately 80 class members who had opted out of the proposed settlement filed a collective action against SLX and the Pilot Schools former principal in Texas State Court.
The Company provided an allowance for credit losses in its pre-emergence financial statements for the estimate of loan forgiveness / net settlement, including legal fees. The allowance was eliminated and the loans were recorded at estimated fair value in connection with the Companys implementation of FSA.
66
In the second quarter of 2007, the office of the United States Attorney for the Central District of California requested that CIT produce the billing and invoicing histories for a portfolio of customer accounts that CIT purchased from a third-party vendor. The request was made in connection with an ongoing investigation being conducted by federal authorities into billing practices involving that portfolio. Certain state authorities, including California, have been conducting a parallel investigation. The investigations are being conducted under the Federal False Claims Act and its state law equivalents. CIT is cooperating with these investigations, and substantial progress has been made towards a resolution of the investigations. Based on the facts known to date, CIT believes these matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial statements or results of operations.
SNAP-ON ARBITRATION
On January 8, 2010, Snap-on Incorporated and Snap-on Credit LLC (Snap-on) filed a Demand for Arbitration alleging that CIT retained certain monies owed to Snap-on in connection with a joint venture between CIT and Snap-on that was terminated on July 16, 2009. Snap-on is alleging that CIT improperly underpaid Snap-on during the course of the joint venture, primarily related to the purchase by CIT of receivables originated and serviced by the joint venture, and is alleging damages of up to $115 million. On January 29, 2010, CIT filed its Answering Statement and Counterclaim, denying Snap-ons allegations on the grounds that the claims are untimely, improperly initiated, or otherwise barred. CIT also alleges that Snap-on wrongfully withheld payment of proceeds due to CIT from the receivables serviced by Snap-on on behalf of CIT. CIT is claiming damages in excess of $110 million. CIT believes that Snap-ons allegations are largely without merit.
OTHER LITIGATION
In addition, there are various legal proceedings and government investigations against or including CIT, which have arisen in the ordinary course of business. While the outcomes of the ordinary course legal proceedings and the related activities are not certain, based on present assessments, management does not believe that they will have a material adverse effect.
For a discussion of certain risk factors affecting CIT, see Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors, on pages 1120 of CITs 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Forward-Looking Statements on page 64 of this Form 10-Q.
No purchases of CIT equity securities were made during the 2010 second quarter and there were no such equity securities that may yet be purchased under any repurchase plans or programs.
(a) Exhibits
3.1 |
Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated December 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed December 9, 2009). |
3.2 |
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, as amended through December 8, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed December 9, 2009). |
67
4.1 |
Indenture dated as of December 10, 2009 between CIT Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed December 16, 2009). |
4.2 |
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 10, 2009 among CIT Group Inc., certain Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas for the issuance of series A second-priority secured notes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed December 16, 2009). |
4.3 |
Indenture as of dated December 10, 2009 between CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware, LLC and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed December 16, 2009). |
4.4 |
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 10, 2009 CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware, LLC, CIT Group Inc. and the other Guarantors named therein and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas for the issuance of series B second-priority secured notes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed December 16, 2009). |
4.5 |
Indenture dated as of January 20, 2006 between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.) for the issuance of senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-Q filed August 7, 2006). |
4.6 |
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 13, 2007 between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.) for the issuance of senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 13, 2007). |
4.7 |
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 2009, between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon relating to senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2009). |
4.8 |
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 16, 2009 between CIT Group Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon relating to senior debt securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 10-Q filed October 19, 2009). |
4.10 |
Amendment Agreement, dated October 28, 2009, by and among CIT Group Inc., certain subsidiaries of CIT Group Inc., Bank of America N.A., as successor administrative agent and successor collateral agent, and the requisite lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed November 16, 2009). |
4.11 |
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of October 28, 2009, among CIT Group Inc., certain subsidiaries of CIT Group Inc., the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and Banc of America Securities LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as joint lead arrangers, bookrunners and syndication agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed November 16, 2009). |
4.12 |
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of December 10, 2009 by and among CIT Group Inc., Certain Subsidiaries of CIT Group Inc., Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent and the requisite lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed December 16, 2009). |
10.1 |
Form of Separation Agreement by and between Tyco International Ltd. and CIT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 26, 2002). |
10.2 |
Form of Financial Services Cooperation Agreement by and between Tyco International Ltd. and CIT (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed June 12, 2002). |
10.3* |
Amended and Restated CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective December 10, 2009) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-8 filed January 11, 2010). |
10.4* |
CIT Group Inc. Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed May 15, 2006). |
10.5* | Employment Agreement, dated August 29, 2006, between CIT Group Inc. and Jeffrey M. Peek (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed September 5, 2006). |
10.6* |
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 10, 2007, between CIT Group Inc. and Jeffrey M. Peek (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Form 10-K filed February 29, 2008). |
10.7* |
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2008, between CIT Group Inc. and Jeffrey M. Peek (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to form 10-K filed March 2, 2009). |
10.8* | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement. |
10.9* | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement. |
10.10* | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Deferred Cash Retention Award Agreement for executives with employment agreements. |
10.11* | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Deferred Cash Retention Award Agreement for executives without employment agreements. |
10.12* | CIT Group Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008). |
10.13* | CIT Group Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008). |
10.14* | New Executive Retirement Plan of CIT Group Inc. (As Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008). |
10.15* | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of May 8, 2008, between CIT Group Inc. and Joseph M. Leone (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to Form 10-Q filed May 12, 2008. |
10.16* | Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 22, 2008, between CIT Group Inc. and Joseph M. Leone (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Form 10-K filed March 2, 2009). |
68
10.17* |
Extension of Term of Employment Agreement dated as of December 18, 2009 between CIT Group Inc. and Joseph M. Leone. |
10.18* |
CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan 2010 Annual Stock Salary Agreement for Joseph M. Leone, effective January 1, 2010. |
10.19* |
Employment Agreement, dated June 16, 2008, between CIT Group Inc. and Alexander T. Mason (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Form 10-Q filed November 10, 2008). |
10.20* | Letter Agreement between CIT Group Inc. and Alexander T. Mason, dated January 29, 2010. |
10.21* |
Letter Agreement between CIT Group Inc. and John A. Thain, effective February 8, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2010). |
10.22* |
Form of CIT Group Inc. Three Year Stock Salary Award Agreement, dated February 8, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2010). |
10.23* | Form of CIT Group Inc. One Year Stock Salary Award Agreement, dated February 8, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2010). |
10.24 |
Confirmation; Credit Support Annex and ISDA Schedule, each dated June 6, 2008 and between CIT Financial Ltd. and Goldman Sachs International evidencing a $3 billion securities based financing facility (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Form 10-Q filed November 10, 2008). |
10.25 |
Letter Agreement, dated December 23, 2008, between CIT Group Inc. and the United States Department of the Treasury, and the Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms attached thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 24, 2008). |
10.26 |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2008, between CIT Group Inc., and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008). |
10.27 |
Order to Cease and Desist, in the matter of CIT Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah, dated July 16, 2009, issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to Form 10-Q filed August 17, 2009). |
10.28 |
Order to Cease and Desist, in the matter of CIT Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah, dated July 16, 2009, issued by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to Form 10-Q filed August 17, 2009). |
10.29 |
Written Agreement, dated August 12, 2009, between CIT Group Inc. and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed August 13, 2009). |
10.30 |
Amended and Restated Confirmation regarding Total Return Swap Facility, dated as of October 28, 2009, by and between CIT Financial Ltd. and Goldman Sachs International (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K/A filed May 13, 2010). |
10.31 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Two Year Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated July 29, 2010. |
10.32 | Letter Agreement between CIT Group Inc. and Scott T. Parker, dated June 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K filed July 6, 2010). |
10.33 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Retention Award Agreement. |
10.34 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement. |
10.35 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement (One Year Vesting). |
10.36 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Stock Option Award Agreement (Three Year Vesting). |
10.37 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (One Year Vesting). |
10.38 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Three Year Vesting). |
10.39 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Director Award Agreement (Initial Grant). |
10.40 | Form of CIT Group Inc. Long-term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Director Award Agreement (Annual Grant). |
12.1 |
CIT Group Inc. and Subsidiaries Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
23.1 |
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
24.1 |
Powers of Attorney. |
31.1 |
Certification of John A. Thain pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Commission, as promulgated pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 |
Certification of Scott T. Parker pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Commission, as promulgated pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 |
Certification of John A. Thain pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 |
Certification of Scott T. Parker pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
99.1 |
Senior Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2009, among Bank of America, N.A., as First Lien Credit Facility Representative and First Lien Agent, Deutsche Bank Trust Company of America, as Series A Representative and Series A Collateral Agent and as Series B Representative and Series B Collateral Agent, CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware, LLC, as CIT Leasing Secured Party, and CIT and certain of its subsidiaries, as obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K/A filed May 13, 2010). |
99.2 |
Junior Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2009, among Deutsche Bank Trust Company of America, as Series A Collateral Agent and as Series B Collateral Agent, CIT Group Funding Company of Delaware, LLC, as CIT Leasing Secured Party, and CIT and certain of its subsidiaries, as obligors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K/A filed May 13, 2010). |
101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document (Includes the following financial information included in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is tagged as blocks of text.) |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
* |
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
** |
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an application for confidential treatment pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
69
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
August 9, 2010
CIT GROUP INC. | |
/s/ Scott T. Parker | |
|
|
Scott T. Parker | |
Executive Vice President and | |
Chief Financial Officer |
70