FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2006 |
|
|
OR |
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD
FROM TO |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9516
American Real Estate Partners, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
13-3398766 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
100 South Bedford Road, Mt. Kisco, NY |
|
10549 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(914) 242-7700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12-b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check One).
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filerþ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of May 8, 2006, there were 61,856,830 depositary units
and 11,340,243 preferred units outstanding.
INDEX
2
Part I. Financial
Information
|
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
MARCH 31, 2006
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
(In $000s) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
464,850 |
|
|
$ |
576,123 |
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
876,281 |
|
|
|
820,699 |
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
275,485 |
|
|
|
244,239 |
|
|
Trade, notes and other receivables, net
|
|
|
222,959 |
|
|
|
255,014 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
432,646 |
|
|
|
287,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,272,221 |
|
|
|
2,184,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
769,231 |
|
|
|
742,459 |
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
435,547 |
|
|
|
441,059 |
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
296,308 |
|
|
|
285,694 |
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
150,210 |
|
|
|
166,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,651,296 |
|
|
|
1,635,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
16,050 |
|
|
|
15,964 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
107,459 |
|
|
|
107,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,070,428 |
|
|
$ |
3,966,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
112,709 |
|
|
$ |
93,807 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
156,382 |
|
|
|
225,690 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
22,167 |
|
|
|
24,155 |
|
|
Securities sold not yet purchased
|
|
|
117,925 |
|
|
|
75,883 |
|
|
Margin liability on marketable securities
|
|
|
217,265 |
|
|
|
131,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
626,448 |
|
|
|
550,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,413,614 |
|
|
|
1,411,666 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
83,839 |
|
|
|
89,085 |
|
Preferred limited partnership units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$10 liquidation preference, 5% cumulative pay-in-kind;
11,400,000 authorized; 11,340,243 and 10,800,397 issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2006 and December 31,
2005, respectively
|
|
|
113,402 |
|
|
|
112,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,610,855 |
|
|
|
1,612,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,237,303 |
|
|
|
2,163,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
289,472 |
|
|
|
304,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depositary units; 67,850,000 authorized; 62,994,030 outstanding
as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively
|
|
|
1,772,877 |
|
|
|
1,728,572 |
|
|
General partner:
|
|
|
(217,303 |
) |
|
|
(218,202 |
) |
|
Treasury units at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,137,200 depositary units
|
|
|
(11,921 |
) |
|
|
(11,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity
|
|
|
1,543,653 |
|
|
|
1,498,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners equity
|
|
$ |
4,070,428 |
|
|
$ |
3,966,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
(In 000s, except per | |
|
|
unit amounts) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
$ |
108,292 |
|
|
$ |
15,678 |
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
126,718 |
|
|
|
122,667 |
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
21,526 |
|
|
|
18,082 |
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
243,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,026 |
|
|
|
156,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
|
43,304 |
|
|
|
37,070 |
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
107,363 |
|
|
|
104,003 |
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
15,826 |
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
281,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding Company
|
|
|
11,304 |
|
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,919 |
|
|
|
159,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
39,107 |
|
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
Other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(30,589 |
) |
|
|
(23,180 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
12,592 |
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
21,471 |
|
|
|
25,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
minority interests
|
|
|
42,581 |
|
|
|
11,743 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(8,658 |
) |
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
15,123 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
49,046 |
|
|
|
9,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
Gain on sales and disposition of real estate
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
18,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
19,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
49,707 |
|
|
$ |
28,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners
|
|
$ |
48,718 |
|
|
$ |
43,127 |
|
|
General partner
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
(14,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,707 |
|
|
$ |
28,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per LP unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per LP unit
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average LP units outstanding:
|
|
|
61,857 |
|
|
|
46,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per LP unit
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average LP units and equivalent partnership units
outstanding
|
|
|
64,759 |
|
|
|
49,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES
IN PARTNERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
Partners | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners | |
|
Equity | |
|
Held in Treasury | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Equity | |
|
Depositary | |
|
| |
|
Partners | |
|
|
(Deficit) | |
|
Units | |
|
Amounts | |
|
Units | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In 000s) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
(218,202 |
) |
|
$ |
1,728,572 |
|
|
$ |
(11,921 |
) |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,498,449 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
48,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,707 |
|
|
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(10,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
38,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,956 |
|
CEO LP unit options
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
6,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
(217,303 |
) |
|
$ |
1,772,877 |
|
|
$ |
(11,921 |
) |
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,543,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31, 2006 was
$10.6 million.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In $000s) | |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
49,046 |
|
|
$ |
9,269 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in)
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
46,607 |
|
|
|
32,543 |
|
|
|
Investment gains
|
|
|
(13,750 |
) |
|
|
(21,704 |
) |
|
|
Change in fair market value of Oil and Gas derivative contracts
|
|
|
(37,252 |
) |
|
|
38,769 |
|
|
|
Preferred LP unit interest expense
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
(15,123 |
) |
|
|
(932 |
) |
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
6,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
Impairment loss on fixed assets
|
|
|
7,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in activities on securities sold short
|
|
|
(40,671 |
) |
|
|
(7,117 |
) |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in trade notes and other receivables
|
|
|
31,970 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(34,083 |
) |
|
|
(3,533 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in inventory
|
|
|
(31,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
(7,527 |
) |
|
|
(24,290 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
(30,171 |
) |
|
|
27,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
19,294 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
Net gain from property transactions
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(18,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(29,761 |
) |
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(56,697 |
) |
|
|
(53,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable equity and debt securities
|
|
|
(72,848 |
) |
|
|
(81,779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales from marketable equity and debt securities
|
|
|
44,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the sales and disposition of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from sales and disposition of fixed assets
|
|
|
7,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(78,312 |
) |
|
|
(125,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the sales and disposition of real estate
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
43,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(77,339 |
) |
|
|
(81,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from senior notes payable
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
480,000 |
|
|
|
Proceeds from credit facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,941 |
|
|
|
Repayment of credit facilities
|
|
|
(3,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in due to affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,385 |
) |
|
|
Payments of mortgages payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,702 |
) |
|
|
Periodic principal payments
|
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
|
(1,598 |
) |
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(4,173 |
) |
|
|
461,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(111,273 |
) |
|
|
407,695 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
576,123 |
|
|
|
806,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
464,850 |
|
|
$ |
1,214,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$ |
26,950 |
|
|
$ |
12,314 |
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
(10,751 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,394 |
) |
See Note 4 for discussion of the purchase of short-term
investments in the third quarter of 2005.
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
March 31, 2006
American Real Estate Partners, L.P. (the Company or
AREP) is a master limited partnership formed in
Delaware on February 17, 1987. AREP is a diversified
holding company owning subsidiaries engaged in the following
operating businesses: (1) Oil and Gas; (2) Gaming;
(3) Real Estate and (4) Home Fashion.
We own a 99% limited partner interest in American Real Estate
Holdings Limited Partnership, or AREH. AREH, the operating
partnership, holds our investments and conducts our business
operations. Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are
owned by AREH and substantially all of our operations are
conducted through AREH and its subsidiaries. American Property
Investors, Inc., or API, owns a 1% general partner interest in
both us and AREH, representing an aggregate 1.99% general
partner interest in us and AREH. API is owned and controlled by
Mr. Carl C. Icahn.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related
notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes contained in our annual
report on
Form 10-K, as
amended for the year ended December 31, 2005. The financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission related to
interim financial statements. The financial information
contained herein is unaudited; however, all adjustments which,
in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly
the results for the interim periods, have been made. All such
adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Certain prior
year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to the
current year presentation.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its wholly and majority owned subsidiaries in
which control can be exercised. The Company is considered to
have control if it has a direct or indirect ability to make
decisions about an entitys activities through voting or
similar rights. All material intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
For a number of reasons the results of operations for interim
periods are not normally indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year. Variations in the amount and timing
of gains and losses on our investments and derivative contracts
in our Oil and Gas segment can be significant. In addition, the
results of our Gaming and Home Fashion segments are seasonal.
|
|
|
Change in Reporting Entity |
Our historical financial statements herein have been revised to
reflect the acquisition of interests in five entities in the
second quarter of 2005 which were under common control of
Mr. Icahn. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, assets transferred between entities under common
control are accounted for at historical cost similar to a
pooling of interests, and the financial statements of such
previously separate companies for periods prior to the
acquisition are revised on a combined basis.
Certain of our real estate properties are classified as
discontinued operations. The properties classified as
discontinued operations have changed during 2005 and,
accordingly, certain amounts in the statements of operations and
cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 have
been reclassified to conform to the current classification of
properties.
7
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
Acquisition of the Assets of WestPoint Stevens Inc. |
On August 8, 2005, WestPoint International, Inc.
(WPI), an indirect subsidiary of the Company,
completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
WestPoint Stevens Inc. (WPS). Operating results for
WPI are included with AREPs results beginning as of
August 8, 2005.
A recent court order may result in our ownership of WPI being
reduced to less than 50%. If we were to own less than 50% of the
outstanding common stock, we would have to evaluate whether we
should consolidate WPI and our financial statements could be
materially different than those presented herein. (See
Note 21.)
We classify our marketable securities as either
available-for-sale or trading based upon
whether the objective of the purchase is to generate profits on
short-term differences in price. Securities that are classified
as available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized
gains and losses reported as a separate component of
partners equity. Trading securities are carried at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses included in net earnings
(loss). Effective January 1, 2006, certain trading
securities were reclassified to available-for-sale based on a
reassessment of the manner in which we hold investments. (See
note 4 for details of investments and note 13 for
details of gains and losses on investments.)
|
|
|
Filing Status of Subsidiaries |
Each of National Energy Group, Inc. (NEG) and
Atlantic Coast Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (Atlantic
Coast) are reporting companies under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, American Casino &
Entertainment Properties LLC (ACEP) voluntarily
files annual, quarterly and current reports.
On February 14, 2006, NEG, Inc., our newly formed
subsidiary, in connection with a planned initial public
offering, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
Registration Statement on
Form S-1.
|
|
Note 2. |
Related Party Transactions |
|
|
|
a. Administrative
Services |
In July 2005, we entered into a new license agreement with an
API affiliate for the non-exclusive use of approximately
1,514 square feet for which we pay monthly base rent of
$13,000 plus 16.4% of certain additional rent. The
terms of the license agreement were reviewed and approved by the
audit committee of the Board of Directors of API. The license
agreement expires in May 2012. Under the agreement, base rent is
subject to increases in July 2008 and December 2011.
Additionally, we are entitled to certain annual rent credits
each December, beginning December 2005 and continuing through
December 2011. In the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005, the Company paid rent of approximately $53,300 and
$39,100, respectively.
In the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we paid
approximately $214,500 and $272,400, respectively, to an API
affiliate for telecommunication services.
An API affiliate provided certain professional services to WPI
for which it incurred charges of approximately $81,000 in the
three months ended March 31, 2006.
An API affiliate provided certain administrative services for
which we incurred charges of approximately $22,000 in the three
months ended March 31, 2005. No charges were incurred in
2006.
8
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
We provided certain administrative services to an API affiliate
for which we charged $113,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2006.
As of May 8, 2006, affiliates of Mr. Icahn owned
9,813,346 preferred units and 55,655,382 depositary units, which
represent 86.5% and 90.0% of the outstanding preferred units and
depositary units, respectively.
We conduct business in four principal areas: Oil and Gas,
Gaming, Real Estate and Home Fashion.
We conduct our Oil and Gas operations through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, NEG Oil & Gas LLC (NEG Oil &
Gas) (formerly AREP Oil & Gas LLC). NEG Oil & Gas
includes our 50.01% ownership interest in NEG, a direct 50%
membership interest in NEG Holding LLC (NEG
Holdings), an indirect 50% membership interest (through
NEG) in NEG Holdings, and a 100% ownership interest in National
Onshore LP and National Offshore LP. Our Oil and Gas
operations consist of exploration, development, and production
operations principally in Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and
Arkansas and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico.
Summary balance sheets for NEG Oil & Gas as of
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, included in the
consolidated balance sheets, are as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
120,072 |
|
|
$ |
172,188 |
|
Oil and gas properties, full cost method
|
|
|
769,231 |
|
|
|
742,459 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
44,076 |
|
|
|
43,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
933,379 |
|
|
$ |
958,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
69,566 |
|
|
$ |
103,726 |
|
Credit facility (non-current)
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
56,356 |
|
|
|
60,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
425,922 |
|
|
$ |
464,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Summarized statements of operations for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, including amounts related to
unrealized derivative gains (losses), are as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Gross oil and gas revenues
|
|
$ |
81,183 |
|
|
$ |
56,263 |
|
|
Realized derivative losses
|
|
|
(12,087 |
) |
|
|
(3,133 |
) |
|
Unrealized derivative gains (losses)
|
|
|
37,252 |
|
|
|
(38,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
|
106,348 |
|
|
|
14,361 |
|
Plant revenues
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
108,292 |
|
|
|
15,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas operating expenses
|
|
|
14,045 |
|
|
|
13,364 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
24,134 |
|
|
|
20,303 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses
|
|
|
43,304 |
|
|
|
37,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
64,988 |
|
|
$ |
(21,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas operating expenses comprise expenses that are
directly attributable to exploration, development and production
operations including lease operating expenses, transportation
expenses, gas plant operating expenses, ad valorem and
production taxes.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, natural
gas comprised 65% and 63% of gross oil and gas revenues,
respectively.
We own and operate gaming properties in Las Vegas and Atlantic
City. Our Las Vegas properties include the Stratosphere Casino
Hotel and Tower, Arizona Charlies Decatur and Arizona
Charlies Boulder. Our Atlantic City operations are based
on our ownership of The Sands Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City,
New Jersey through our majority ownership of Atlantic Holdings.
10
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Summary balance sheets for our Gaming segment as of
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, included in the
consolidated balance sheets, are as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
168,930 |
|
|
$ |
158,250 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
435,547 |
|
|
|
441,059 |
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
57,614 |
|
|
|
57,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
662,091 |
|
|
$ |
656,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
55,092 |
|
|
$ |
59,271 |
|
Long term debt
|
|
|
220,209 |
|
|
|
217,335 |
|
Other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
12,298 |
|
|
|
14,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
287,599 |
|
|
$ |
291,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized statements of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino
|
|
$ |
85,372 |
|
|
$ |
85,070 |
|
|
Hotel
|
|
|
20,321 |
|
|
|
18,087 |
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
|
22,475 |
|
|
|
21,942 |
|
|
Tower, retail and other income
|
|
|
8,757 |
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
136,925 |
|
|
|
133,976 |
|
|
|
Less promotional allowances
|
|
|
10,207 |
|
|
|
11,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
126,718 |
|
|
|
122,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino
|
|
|
27,846 |
|
|
|
27,727 |
|
|
Hotel
|
|
|
8,071 |
|
|
|
6,726 |
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
|
15,278 |
|
|
|
13,942 |
|
|
Tower, retail and other income
|
|
|
4,479 |
|
|
|
3,847 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
42,262 |
|
|
|
42,542 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,427 |
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
107,363 |
|
|
|
104,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
|
$ |
18,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our real estate operations consist of rental real estate,
property development, and associated resort activities.
11
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
A summary of real estate assets as of March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, included in the consolidated balance
sheets, is as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Rental properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance leases, net
|
|
$ |
72,378 |
|
|
$ |
73,292 |
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
49,483 |
|
|
|
50,012 |
|
Property development
|
|
|
128,502 |
|
|
|
116,007 |
|
Resort properties
|
|
|
45,945 |
|
|
|
46,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
$ |
296,308 |
|
|
$ |
285,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the above are properties held for sale. The
amount included in other current assets related to such
properties was $26.5 million and $27.2 million at
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The operating results of certain of these properties are
classified as discontinued operations.
Summarized statements of operations attributable to real estate
operations are as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on financing leases
|
|
$ |
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
1,966 |
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
Property development
|
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
Resort operations
|
|
|
6,082 |
|
|
|
5,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
21,526 |
|
|
|
18,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental real estate
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
Property development
|
|
|
9,976 |
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
Resort operations
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
15,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
4,026 |
|
|
$ |
2,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006, we owned 51 rental real estate
properties. These primarily consist of fee and leasehold
interests in real estate in 23 states. Most of these
properties are net-leased to single corporate tenants.
Approximately 84% of these properties are currently net-leased,
6% are operating properties and 10% are vacant.
12
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
We market portions of our commercial real estate portfolio for
sale. Sale activity was as follows (in $000s, except unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Properties sold
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Proceeds received
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
43,464 |
|
Mortgage debt repaid
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
Total gain recorded
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
13,200 |
|
Gain recorded in operations
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
Gain recorded in discontinued operations(i)
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
13,014 |
|
|
|
(i) |
A gain of $5.7 million on the sale of resort properties was
recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2005 in
addition to gains on the rental portfolio. |
|
|
|
Property Development and Associated Resort
Activities |
We own, primarily through our Bayswater subsidiary, residential
development properties. Bayswater, a real estate investment,
management and development company, focuses primarily on the
construction and sale of single-family houses, multi-family
homes and lots in subdivisions and planned communities, and raw
land for residential development. Our New Seabury development
property in Cape Cod, Massachusetts, and our Grand Harbor and
Oak Harbor development property in Vero Beach, Florida each
include land for current and future residential development of
approximately 450 and 1,000 units of residential housing,
respectively. Both developments operate golf and resort
activities. We are also developing residential communities in
Naples, Florida and Westchester County, New York.
Property development sales activity was as follows (in $000s
except unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Units sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Seabury, Massachusetts
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Harbor/ Oak Harbor, Florida
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Falling Waters, Florida
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Seabury, Massachusetts
|
|
$ |
9,033 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Grand Harbor/ Oak Harbor, Florida
|
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
Falling Waters, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
8,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
We conduct our Home Fashion operations through our majority
ownership in WPI.
Summary balance sheets for Home Fashion as of March 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005, as included in the consolidated
balance sheets, are as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
556,904 |
|
|
$ |
583,496 |
|
Property plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
150,210 |
|
|
|
166,026 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
730,516 |
|
|
$ |
772,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
$ |
102,040 |
|
|
$ |
103,931 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
5,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$ |
103,909 |
|
|
$ |
109,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized statement of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 are as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
243,490 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
228,360 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
53,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$ |
(37,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation for the period was $10.4 million, of
which $8.6 million was included in cost of sales and
$1.8 million was included in selling, general and
administrative. Total expenses for the period include
$7.7 million of impairment charges related to the fixed
assets of plants that will be closed and $2.1 million of
restructuring charges (of which approximately $1.2 million
relates to severance and $0.9 million relates to continuing
costs related to closed plants).
Our basis in WPI is less than our share of the equity in WPI by
$110.7 million. The excess of fair value over cost of net
assets acquired has been reflected as a reduction of long-lived
assets in our consolidated balance sheet. Fixed assets were
reduced by $98.4 million and intangible assets were reduced
by $12.3 million. Reductions in depreciation expense and in
the impairment charge of $5.4 million and
$4.1 million, respectively, for the three month period
ended March 31, 2006 were recorded related to the excess of
fair value over cost that had been assigned to fixed assets.
14
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
Note 4. |
Investments and Related Matters |
Investments consist of the following (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
December 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Current Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity and debt securities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,301 |
|
|
$ |
39,232 |
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,728 |
|
|
|
33,301 |
|
|
|
39,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency obligations
|
|
|
9,832 |
|
|
|
9,734 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
Marketable equity and debt securities
|
|
|
842,334 |
|
|
|
832,141 |
|
|
|
746,731 |
|
|
|
746,839 |
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
20,031 |
|
|
|
19,678 |
|
|
|
31,282 |
|
|
|
31,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current available for sale
|
|
|
872,197 |
|
|
|
861,553 |
|
|
|
781,359 |
|
|
|
781,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current investments
|
|
$ |
872,197 |
|
|
$ |
876,281 |
|
|
$ |
814,660 |
|
|
$ |
820,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other securities
|
|
|
16,050 |
|
|
|
16,050 |
|
|
|
15,964 |
|
|
|
15,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current
|
|
$ |
16,050 |
|
|
$ |
16,050 |
|
|
$ |
15,964 |
|
|
$ |
15,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of available for sale securities were
$128.3 million (of which $86.1 million was due from
broker) and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively. The gross realized gains on the sale of
available for sale securities were $28.9 million and $0 for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. For purposes of determining gains and losses, the
cost of securities is based on specific identification.
Net unrealized losses on available for sale securities in the
amount of $10.8 million and $2.4 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, have
been included in other comprehensive income.
Included in Trading other investments at
March 31, 2006 are $14.7 million in unrealized gains
on derivative instruments.
In the third quarter of 2005, we began using the services of an
unaffiliated third party investment manager to manage certain
fixed income investments. At March 31, 2006,
$460.1 million had been invested at the discretion of such
manager in a diversified portfolio consisting predominantly of
short-term investment grade debt securities. Investments managed
by the third party investment manager are classified as
available for sale securities in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
15
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
Margin Liability on Marketable Securities |
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, liabilities
of $217.3 and $131.1 million, respectively, had been
recorded related to purchases of securities that had been made
on margin. The margin liability is secured by the securities we
purchased and cannot exceed certain pre-established percentages
of the fair market value of the securities collateralizing the
liability. If the margin liability exceeds such percentages, we
will be subject to a margin call and required to fund the
account to return the margin balance to the pre-established
percentages of the fair market value of the securities
collateralizing the liability.
Inventories, net, relate solely to our Home Fashion segment and
consist of the following (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$ |
34,432 |
|
|
$ |
33,083 |
|
Goods in process
|
|
|
103,134 |
|
|
|
100,337 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
137,919 |
|
|
|
110,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
275,485 |
|
|
$ |
244,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. |
Trade, Notes and Other Receivables, Net |
Trade notes and other receivables, net, consist of the following
(in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Trade receivables Home Fashion
|
|
$ |
152,434 |
|
|
$ |
173,050 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts Home Fashion
|
|
|
(8,529 |
) |
|
|
(8,313 |
) |
Trade receivables Oil and Gas
|
|
|
46,313 |
|
|
|
58,956 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts Oil and Gas
|
|
|
(5,377 |
) |
|
|
(5,572 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
38,118 |
|
|
|
36,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
222,959 |
|
|
$ |
255,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. |
Other Current Assets |
Other current assets consist of the following (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
$ |
42,080 |
|
|
$ |
49,876 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
228,092 |
|
|
|
161,210 |
|
Due from brokers
|
|
|
86,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
76,329 |
|
|
|
76,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
432,646 |
|
|
$ |
287,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
At March 31, 2006, assets held for sale consists of
$26.5 million of real estate assets and $15.6 million
of WPI assets held for sale. At December 31, 2005, assets
held for sale consists of $27.2 million of real estate
assets and $22.7 million of WPI assets held for sale.
Restricted cash is primarily composed of funds required as
collateral for the outstanding short security positions.
Additionally, restricted cash consists of balances for escrow
deposits and funds held to collateralize letters of credit.
|
|
Note 8. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following (in
$000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
181,755 |
|
|
$ |
182,539 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
376,985 |
|
|
|
374,160 |
|
Proved oil and gas properties
|
|
|
1,280,704 |
|
|
|
1,229,923 |
|
Machinery, equipment and furniture
|
|
|
343,321 |
|
|
|
357,018 |
|
Assets leased to others
|
|
|
140,996 |
|
|
|
141,997 |
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
92,469 |
|
|
|
69,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,416,230 |
|
|
|
2,355,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
(764,934 |
) |
|
|
(720,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
1,651,296 |
|
|
$ |
1,635,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense related to
property, plant and equipment for the three month periods ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $45.3 million and
$32.1 million, respectively.
|
|
Note 9. |
Other Non-Current Assets |
Other non-current assets consist of the following (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
$ |
48,705 |
|
|
$ |
51,511 |
|
Deferred finance costs, net of accumulated amortization of
$4,353 and $4,076 as of March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively
|
|
|
26,720 |
|
|
|
29,822 |
|
Restricted deposits
|
|
|
27,559 |
|
|
|
24,805 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,475 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
107,459 |
|
|
$ |
107,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted deposits represent amounts escrowed with respect to
asset retirement obligations at our Oil and Gas operations.
17
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
Note 10. |
Other Non-Current Liabilities |
Other non-current liabilities consist of the following (in
$000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Asset retirement obligations (see Note 17)
|
|
$ |
41,908 |
|
|
$ |
41,228 |
|
Derivative liability (see Note 18)
|
|
|
13,090 |
|
|
|
17,893 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
28,841 |
|
|
|
29,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
83,839 |
|
|
$ |
89,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. |
Minority Interests |
Minority interests consist of the following (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
WPI
|
|
$ |
231,942 |
|
|
$ |
247,015 |
|
Atlantic Coast
|
|
|
57,530 |
|
|
|
57,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
289,472 |
|
|
$ |
304,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt consists of the following (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
|
Senior unsecured 7.125% notes due 2013 AREP
|
|
$ |
480,000 |
|
|
$ |
480,000 |
|
Senior unsecured 8.125% notes due 2012 AREP
|
|
|
351,003 |
|
|
|
350,922 |
|
Senior secured 7.85% notes due 2012 ACEP
|
|
|
215,000 |
|
|
|
215,000 |
|
Borrowings under credit facility NEG Oil & Gas
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Mortgages payable
|
|
|
80,414 |
|
|
|
81,512 |
|
Other
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
8,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,435,781 |
|
|
|
1,435,821 |
|
Less current portion, including debt related to real estate held
for sale
|
|
|
22,167 |
|
|
|
24,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,413,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,411,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes restrictions and
covenants AREP |
Both of our senior unsecured notes issuances restrict the
payment of cash dividends or distributions, the purchase of
equity interests or the purchase, redemption, defeasance or
acquisition of debt subordinated to the senior unsecured notes.
The notes also restrict the incurrence of debt, or the issuance
of disqualified stock, as defined, with certain exceptions,
provided that we may incur debt or issue disqualified stock if,
immediately after such incurrence or issuance, the ratio of the
aggregate principal amount of all outstanding indebtedness of
AREP and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis to the
tangible net worth of AREP and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis would have been less than 1.75 to 1.0. As of
March 31, 2006, such ratio was less than
18
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
1.75 to 1.0, and accordingly, based on this ratio, we and
AREH could have incurred up to approximately $1.5 billion
of additional indebtedness.
In addition, both issuances of notes require that on each
quarterly determination date we and the guarantor of the notes
(currently only AREH) maintain a minimum ratio of cash flow to
fixed charges each as defined, of 1.5 to 1, for the
four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently completed prior
to such quarterly determination date. For the four quarters
ended March 31, 2006, the ratio of cash flow to fixed
charges was in excess of 1.5 to 1.0.
The notes also require, on each quarterly determination date,
that the ratio of total unencumbered assets, as defined, to the
principal amount of unsecured indebtedness, as defined, be
greater than 1.5 to 1.0 as of the last day of the most
recently completed fiscal quarter. As of March 31, 2006,
such ratio was in excess of 1.5 to 1.0.
|
|
|
Senior secured 7.85% notes due 2012
ACEP |
ACEPs 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 restrict
the payment of cash dividends or distributions by ACEP, the
purchase of its equity interests, the purchase, redemption,
defeasance or acquisition of debt subordinated to ACEPs
notes and investments as restricted payments.
ACEPs notes also prohibit the incurrence of debt, or the
issuance of disqualified or preferred stock, as defined, by
ACEP, with certain exceptions, provided that ACEP may incur debt
or issue disqualified stock if, immediately after such
incurrence or issuance, the ratio of consolidated cash flow to
fixed charges (each as defined) for the most recently ended four
full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are
available immediately preceding the date on which such
additional indebtedness is incurred or disqualified stock or
preferred stock is issued would have been at least 2.0 to 1.0,
determined on a pro forma basis giving effect to the debt
incurrence or issuance. As of March 31, 2006, such ratio
was in excess of 2.0 to 1.0. The ACEP notes also restrict the
creation of liens, the sale of assets, mergers, consolidations
or sales of substantially all of its assets, the lease or grant
of a license, concession, other agreements to occupy, manage or
use our assets, the issuance of capital stock of restricted
subsidiaries and certain related party transactions. The ACEP
notes allow it to incur indebtedness, among other things, of up
to $50 million under credit facilities, non-recourse
financing of up to $15 million to finance the construction,
purchase or lease of personal or real property used in its
business, permitted affiliate subordinated indebtedness (as
defined), the issuance of additional 7.85% senior secured
notes due 2012 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
2.0 times net cash proceeds received from equity offerings
and permitted affiliate subordinated debt, and additional
indebtedness of up to $10.0 million.
Additionally, ACEPs senior secured revolving credit
facility allows for borrowings of up to $20.0 million,
including the issuance of letters of credit of up to
$10.0 million. Loans made under the senior secured
revolving facility will mature and the commitments under them
will terminate in January 2008. At March 31, 2006, there
were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the
facility. The facility contains restrictive covenants similar to
those contained in the 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012.
In addition, the facility requires that, as of the last date of
each fiscal quarter, ACEPs ratio of net property, plant
and equipment for key properties, as defined, to consolidated
first lien debt be not less than 5.0 to 1.0 and ACEPs
ratio of consolidated first lien debt to consolidated cash flow
not be more than 1.0 to 1.0. At March 31, 2006,
we were in compliance with the relevant covenants. On
May 10, 2006 we increased our senior secured revolving
credit facility to $60.0 million on substantially the same
terms and conditions.
The restrictions imposed by ACEPs senior secured notes and
the credit facility likely will limit our receiving payments
from the operations of our principal hotel and gaming properties.
19
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
NEG Oil & Gas LLC Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Facility |
On December 22, 2005, NEG Oil & Gas entered into a
credit facility, dated as of December 20, 2005, with
Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent, Bear Stearns
Corporate Lending Inc., as syndication agent, and certain other
lender parties. At March 31, 2006, the interest rate on the
outstanding amount under the credit facility was 6.44%.
Commitment fees for the unused credit facility range from 0.375%
to 0.50% and are payable quarterly.
The credit facility contains covenants that, amongst other
things, restrict the incurrence of indebtedness by NEG
Oil & Gas and its subsidiaries, the creation of liens
by them, hedging contracts, mergers and issuances of securities
by them and distributions and investments by NEG Oil &
Gas and its subsidiaries. It also requires NEG Oil & Gas to
maintain: (1) a ratio of consolidated total debt to
consolidated EBITDA (for the four fiscal quarter period ending
on the date of the consolidated balance sheet used to determine
consolidated total debt), as defined, of not more than
3.5 to 1.0; (2) consolidated tangible net worth,
as defined, of not less than $240 million, plus 50% of
consolidated net income for each fiscal quarter ending after
December 31, 2005 for which consolidated net income is
positive; and (3) a ratio of consolidated current assets to
consolidated current liabilities of not less than
1.0 to 1.0. These covenants may have the effect of
limiting distributions by NEG Oil & Gas. As of
March 31, 2006, NEG Oil & Gas was in compliance with
each of the covenants.
|
|
Note 13. |
Other Income (Expense) |
Other income (expense) of $21.5 million included, for the
three months ended March 31, 2006, net realized gains on
marketable securities of $28.3 million, net unrealized
losses on marketable securities of $10.0 million, and other
income of $3.2 million. Total gains or losses on marketable
securities included $29.2 million of realized gains on long
positions, $4.2 million of realized gains and
$15.5 million unrealized gains on derivatives, and
$5.1 million of realized losses and $25.5 million of
unrealized losses on securities sold short. For the three months
ended March 31, 2005, there were no sales of securities.
Other income (expense) for the three months ended March 31,
2005 of $26.0 million included unrealized gains on
marketable securities of $21.7 million, including
$17.9 million unrealized gains on securities sold short,
gain on sale or disposition of real estate of $0.2 million
and other income of $4.1 million.
On June 29, 2005, we granted 700,000 nonqualified unit
options to our chief executive officer. The option agreement
permitted our chief executive officer to purchase up to 700,000
of our depositary units at an exercise price of $35 per
unit and vested over a period of eight years. On March 14,
2006, our chief executive officer resigned from that position,
became a director and Vice-Chairman of the Board of API, and was
designated to be principal executive officer. These changes in
status caused the options to be cancelled in accordance with
their terms.
20
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
In accordance with SFAS 123(R) Share Based Payment,
the cancellation required that any previously unrecognized
compensation cost be recognized at the date of cancellation and
accordingly we recorded a compensation charge of
$6.2 million related to the previously unrecognized
compensation cost.
Pursuant to the terms of the preferred units, on
February 8, 2006, we declared our scheduled annual
preferred unit distribution payable in additional preferred
units at the rate of 5% of the liquidation preference per
preferred unit of $10. The distribution was paid on
March 31, 2006 to holders of record as of March 15,
2006. A total of 539,846 additional preferred units were issued.
At March 31, 2006, 11,340,243 preferred units are issued
and outstanding. In March 2006, the number of authorized
preferred units was increased to 11,400,000.
|
|
Note 16. |
Earnings Per Limited Partnership Unit |
Basic earnings per LP unit are based on earnings attributable to
limited partners. Net earnings available for limited partners
are divided by the weighted average number of limited
partnership units outstanding. Diluted earnings per LP unit
are based on earnings before the preferred unit distribution as
the numerator with the denominator based on the weighted average
number of units and equivalent units outstanding assuming
conversion. The preferred units are considered to be equivalent
units.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted earnings per LP units (in 000s, except per unit
data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Attributable to limited partners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
48,070 |
|
|
$ |
24,217 |
|
Add preferred unit distribution
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before discontinued operations
|
|
|
49,393 |
|
|
|
25,477 |
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
18,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings
|
|
$ |
50,041 |
|
|
$ |
44,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average LP units outstanding
|
|
|
61,857 |
|
|
|
46,098 |
|
Dilutive effect of redemption of preferred LP units
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
Dilutive effect of unit options
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average LP units and equivalent partnership units
outstanding
|
|
|
64,759 |
|
|
|
49,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per LP unit
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per LP unit
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 17. |
Asset Retirement Obligations Oil and Gas |
Our asset retirement obligations represent expected future costs
to plug and abandon our wells, dismantle facilities, and
reclamate sites at the end of the related assets useful
lives.
21
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
As of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had
$26.6 million and $24.3 million, respectively, held in
various escrow accounts relating to the asset retirement
obligations for certain offshore properties, which is included
in other non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheet.
The following table summarizes changes in our asset retirement
obligations during the three months ended March 31, 2006
and the year ended December 31, 2005, respectively (in
$000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning of year
|
|
$ |
41,228 |
|
|
$ |
56,524 |
|
Add: Accretion
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
Drilling additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
Less: Revisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,813 |
) |
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$ |
41,908 |
|
|
$ |
41,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 18. |
Oil and Gas Derivatives |
The following is a summary of our commodity price collar
agreements as of March 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Contract |
|
Production Month | |
|
Volume Per Month | |
|
Floor | |
|
Ceiling | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
31,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
41.65 |
|
|
|
45.25 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
16,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
41.75 |
|
|
|
45.40 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
570,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
120,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
500,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006 |
|
|
|
46,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
60.00 |
|
|
|
68.50 |
|
(The company participates in a second ceiling at $84.50 on the
46,000 Bbls) |
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
30,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
57.00 |
|
|
|
70.50 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
30,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
57.50 |
|
|
|
72.00 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
930,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
10.225 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
46,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
55.00 |
|
|
|
69.00 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
750,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
7.00 |
|
|
|
10.35 |
|
We record derivative contracts as assets or liabilities in the
balance sheet at fair value. As of March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, these derivatives were recorded as a
liability of $48.7 million (including a current liability
of $35.6 million) and $85.9 million (including a
current liability of $68.0 million), respectively. The
long-term portion is included in other non-current liabilities.
We have elected not to designate any of these instruments as
hedges for accounting purposes and, accordingly, both realized
and unrealized gains and losses are included in oil and gas
revenues.
|
|
Note 19. |
Segment Reporting |
We report the following six reportable segments: (1) Oil
and Gas; (2) Gaming; (3) Rental Real Estate;
(4) Property Development; (5) Associated Resort
Activities and (6) Home Fashion. Our three real estate
related operating and reportable segments are all individually
immaterial and have been aggregated for purposes of the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of
operations.
22
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
We assess and measure segment operating results based on segment
earnings from operations as disclosed below. Segment earnings
from operations are not necessarily indicative of cash available
to fund cash requirements nor synonymous with cash flow from
operations. As discussed above, the terms of financing for the
Oil and Gas and Gaming segments impose restrictions on their
ability to transfer funds to us, including restrictions on
dividends, distributions, loans and other transactions.
The revenues and net segment operating income for each of the
reportable segments are summarized as follows for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
$ |
108,292 |
|
|
$ |
15,678 |
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
126,718 |
|
|
|
122,667 |
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental real estate
|
|
|
4,060 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
Property development
|
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
Resort operations
|
|
|
6,082 |
|
|
|
5,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
21,526 |
|
|
|
18,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
243,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
500,026 |
|
|
$ |
156,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net segment operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
$ |
64,988 |
|
|
$ |
(21,392 |
) |
|
Gaming
|
|
|
19,355 |
|
|
|
18,664 |
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental real estate
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
2,956 |
|
|
|
Property development
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
Resort operations
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate earnings
|
|
|
4,026 |
|
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
(37,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income (loss)
|
|
|
50,411 |
|
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding Company costs(i)
|
|
|
(11,304 |
) |
|
|
(2,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
|
39,107 |
|
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(30,589 |
) |
|
|
(23,180 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
12,592 |
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
21,471 |
|
|
|
25,952 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(8,658 |
) |
|
|
(3,406 |
) |
Minority interests
|
|
|
15,123 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
49,046 |
|
|
$ |
9,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
Holding company costs include general and administrative
expenses and acquisition costs of the holding company. General
and administrative expenses of the segments are included in
their respective operating expenses in the accompanying
statements of earnings. |
23
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (D,D&A) by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
$ |
24,134 |
|
|
$ |
20,303 |
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
9,427 |
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental real estate
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
Property development
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
Resort operations
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
10,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D,D&A in operating expenses
|
|
|
45,343 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
Amortization in interest expense
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total D,D&A for continuing operations
|
|
$ |
46,607 |
|
|
$ |
32,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
$ |
933,379 |
|
|
$ |
958,295 |
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
662,091 |
|
|
|
656,941 |
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
434,146 |
|
|
|
442,594 |
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
730,516 |
|
|
|
772,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
2,760,132 |
|
|
|
2,830,754 |
|
|
Reconciling items (ii)
|
|
|
1,310,296 |
|
|
|
1,135,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,070,428 |
|
|
$ |
3,966,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
Reconciling items relate principally to cash and investments of
the Holding Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas
|
|
$ |
50,924 |
|
|
$ |
47,525 |
|
|
Gaming
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
5,257 |
|
|
Rental Real Estate
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel and resort operating properties
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
Home Fashion
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
56,697 |
|
|
$ |
53,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Our corporate subsidiaries recorded the following income tax
expense attributable to continuing operations for its taxable
subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005 (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
(5,847 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,353 |
) |
Deferred
|
|
|
(2,811 |
) |
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,658 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded income tax provisions of $8.7 million and
$3.4 million on pre-tax income of $42.6 million and of
$11.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Our effective income tax rate was
20.3% and 29.0% for the respective periods. The difference
between the effective tax rate and statutory federal rate of 35%
is due principally to income or losses from partnership entities
in which taxes are the responsibility of the partners.
|
|
Note 21. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company is involved in legal and administrative proceedings
of various types. While any litigation contains an element of
uncertainty, we have no reason to believe that the outcome of
such proceedings or claims will have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition.
GB Holdings
On April 4, 2006, certain creditors of GBH Holdings, Inc.,
or GBH, filed a proposed Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
Statement in which they have indicated that they intend to
challenge the transaction in July 2004 that, among other things,
resulted in the transfer of The Sands to ACE Gaming LLC, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Atlantic Holdings, the exchange of
certain of GBHs notes for 3% senior secured convertible
notes of Atlantic Coast, and, our owning 58.2% of the
outstanding Atlantic Coast shares as of March 31, 2006. If
they succeed in challenging these transactions, the creditors
intend to seek to rescind the July 2004 transactions and attempt
to equitably subordinate, in bankruptcy, AREPs claims
against GBH to the claims of such creditors. Under the plan,
they propose to place all of the assets of GBH in a Liquidating
Trust for the benefit of the creditors. The Trust would be
managed by a five-member board, four of whom would be appointed
by the creditors and one of whom is appointed by a limited group
of equity holders of GBH that would not include us. The assets
that would be placed in the Trust include the 2,882,938 shares
of Atlantic Coast stock owned by GBH as well as any litigation
claims owned by the debtor or the estate, including any claims
challenging the July 2004 transactions. We intend to file an
objection to the proposed plan.
The GBH bankruptcy is in its preliminary stages and we cannot
predict the outcome of the case or the potential impact on us.
In November and December 2005, the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York rendered a decision in
Contrarian Funds Inc. v. WestPoint Stevens, Inc.
et al., and issued orders reversing certain provisions
of the bankruptcy court order pursuant to which we acquired our
ownership of a majority of the common stock of a newly formed
company, WPI. WPI acquired substantially all of the assets of
WPS. On April 13, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court entered a
remand order which provides, among other things, that all of
25
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
the shares and rights to acquire shares of WPI issued to us and
the other first lien lenders or held in escrow pursuant to court
order constituted replacement collateral, other than
5,250,000 shares that we acquired for cash. The
5,250,000 shares represent approximately 27% of the
19,498,389 shares of WPI now outstanding. According to the
remand order, we would share pro rata with the other
first lien lenders in proceeds realized from the disposition of
the replacement collateral and, to the extent there is remaining
replacement collateral after satisfying first lien lender
claims, we would share pro rata with the other second
lien lenders in any further proceeds. We were holders of
approximately 39.99% of the outstanding first lien debt and
approximately 51.21% of the outstanding second lien debt. On
April 13, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court also entered an order
staying the remand order pending its appeal. The other first
lien lenders have filed a notice of appeal of the remand order,
and have filed a motion with the District Court to lift the stay
entered by the Bankruptcy Court. We have filed a notice of
appeal of the remand order and an objection to the motion to
lift the stay. We also intend to appeal the prior order that
modified and vacated portions of the original sale order.
We currently own approximately 67.7% of the outstanding shares
of common stock of WPI. As a result of the District Courts
order and the proceedings on remand, our percentage of the
outstanding shares of common stock of WPI could be reduced to
less than 50% and perhaps substantially less. If we were to lose
control of WPI, it could adversely affect the business and
prospects of WPI and the value of our investment in it. In
addition, we consolidated the results and balance sheet of WPI
as of March 31, 2006 and for the period from the date of
acquisition through March 31, 2006. If we were to own less
than 50% of the outstanding common stock, we would have to
evaluate whether we should consolidate WPI and our financial
statements could be materially different than as presented as of
March 31, 2006 and for the three months then ended.
We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the
ultimate impact on our investment in WPI or the business
prospects of WPI.
On November 29, 2005, AREP Laughlin Corporation and AREP
Boardwalk LLC, our subsidiaries, entered into an agreement to
purchase the Flamingo Hotel and Casino in Laughlin, Nevada and
7.7 acres of land in Atlantic City, New Jersey for an
aggregate amount of $170.0 million from Harrahs
Entertainment Inc. AREP Laughlin Corporation was contributed to
our subsidiary, ACEP on April 4, 2006. ACEP is negotiating
to increase its credit facility to $60 million to finance
the acquisition. Completion of the transaction is subject to
regulatory approval and is expected to close in mid-2006.
|
|
Note 22. |
Subsequent Events |
|
|
|
Declaration of Distribution on Depositary Units |
On May 10, 2006, the Board of Directors approved payment of
a quarterly cash distribution of $0.10 per unit on its
depositary units for the second quarter of 2006 consistent with
the distribution policy in 2005. The distribution will be paid
on June 1, 2006 to depositary unitholders of record at the
close of business on May 22, 2006.
26
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (Continued)
On April 21, 2006, our Oil and Gas segment entered into the
following commodity collar agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Contract |
|
Production Month | |
|
Volume per Month | |
|
Floor | |
|
Ceiling | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
1,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
65.00 |
|
|
|
87.40 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
7,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
65.00 |
|
|
|
86.00 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
330,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
9.60 |
|
|
|
12.10 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2007 |
|
|
|
100,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
9.55 |
|
|
|
12.60 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
9,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
65.00 |
|
|
|
81.25 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
70,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
8.75 |
|
|
|
11.90 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2008 |
|
|
|
270,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
8.80 |
|
|
|
11.45 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2009 |
|
|
|
19,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
65.00 |
|
|
|
78.50 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2009 |
|
|
|
26,000 Bbls |
|
|
|
65.00 |
|
|
|
77.00 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2009 |
|
|
|
330,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
7.90 |
|
|
|
10.80 |
|
No cost collars
|
|
|
Jan - Dec 2009 |
|
|
|
580,000 MMBTU |
|
|
|
7.90 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
27
|
|
ITEM 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Managements discussion and analysis of financial condition
and results of operations is comprised of the following sections:
1. Overview
2. Results of Operations
Consolidated Financial Results
Oil and Gas
Gaming
Real Estate
Home Fashion
Corporate and Investments
|
|
|
|
3. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
Consolidated Financial Results
Oil and Gas
Gaming
Real Estate
Home Fashion
4. Certain Trends and Uncertainties
Overview
American Real Estate Partners, L.P., or AREP, is a master
limited partnership formed in Delaware on February 17,
1987. We are a diversified holding company owning subsidiaries
engaged in the following operating businesses: (1) Oil and
Gas; (2) Gaming; (3) Real Estate; and (4) Home
Fashion. Our primary business strategy is to continue to grow
and enhance the value of our businesses. We may also seek to
acquire additional businesses that are distressed or in
out-of-favor industries
and will consider the divestiture of businesses from which we do
not foresee adequate future cash flow or appreciation potential.
In addition, we invest our available liquidity in debt and
equity securities with a view to enhancing returns as we
continue to assess further acquisitions of operating businesses.
We own a 99% limited partner interest in American Real Estate
Holdings Limited Partnership, or AREH. AREH, the operating
partnership, holds our investments and conducts our business
operations. Substantially all of our assets and liabilities are
owned by AREH and substantially all of our operations are
conducted through AREH and its subsidiaries. American Property
Investors, Inc., or API, owns a 1% general partner interest in
both us and AREH, representing an aggregate 1.99% general
partner interest in us and AREH. API is owned and controlled by
Carl C. Icahn. As of March 31, 2006, affiliates of
Mr. Icahn beneficially owned approximately 90% of our
outstanding depositary units and approximately 86.5% of our
outstanding preferred units.
In addition to our Oil and Gas, Gaming, Real Estate and Home
Fashion segments, we discuss the Holding Company. The Holding
Company includes the unconsolidated results of AREH and AREP
and, principally, includes investment activity and expenses
associated with the activities of a holding company. Certain
real estate expenses are included in the Holding Company to the
extent they relate to administration of our various real estate
holdings.
28
Results of Operations
The key factors affecting the financial results for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 versus 2005 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased operating income from Oil and Gas. Gains on unrealized
derivative positions were $37.3 million in 2006 compared to
unrealized losses of $38.8 million in 2005. Additionally,
volumes and prices realized were higher in 2006 compared to
2005, resulting in $24.9 million of additional revenue; |
|
|
|
Operating losses of $38.0 million were realized by our Home
Fashion segment, of which $9.8 million relates to
restructuring costs, consisting primarily of impairment charges
in connection with the closing of plants; |
|
|
|
Increase in Holding Company costs of $8.4 million
principally due to a $6.2 million non-cash compensation charge
related to the cancellation of unit options; and |
|
|
|
Reduced gains on sales of properties: income from discontinued
operations fell $18.6 million. |
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to three
months ended March 31, 2005. |
Revenues increased by $343.6 million, or 219.7%, as
compared to the prior year. This increase reflects the inclusion
of WPI ($243.5 million), and increases of
$92.6 million for Oil and Gas, $4.1 million for Gaming
and $3.4 million for Real Estate.
Operating income increased by $42.5 million, as compared to
2005. This reflects increases of $86.4 million for Oil and
Gas, $0.7 million for Gaming, and $1.8 million for
Real Estate. These items were offset by the inclusion of losses
on WPI of $38.0 million and an increase in Holding Company
costs of $8.4 million.
Interest expense increased by $7.4 million, or 32.0%, as
compared to the prior year. This increase includes a full three
months in 2006 of interest expense on the $480.0 million of
senior notes that we issued on February 7, 2005. Interest
income increased by $0.2 million, or 2.0%. Other income
(expense), net decreased by $4.5 million from the prior
year, primarily reflecting the net realized and unrealized gains
and losses on investments.
29
The following table summarizes key operating data for the Oil
and Gas segment (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gross oil and gas revenues
|
|
$ |
81,183 |
|
|
$ |
56,263 |
|
|
Realized derivative losses
|
|
|
(12,087 |
) |
|
|
(3,133 |
) |
|
Unrealized derivative gains (losses)
|
|
|
37,252 |
|
|
|
(38,769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas revenues
|
|
|
106,348 |
|
|
|
14,361 |
|
Plant revenues
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
108,292 |
|
|
|
15,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and gas operating expenses
|
|
|
14,045 |
|
|
|
13,364 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
24,134 |
|
|
|
20,303 |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,304 |
|
|
|
37,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
64,988 |
|
|
$ |
(21,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, natural
gas comprised 65% and 63% of gross oil and gas revenues,
respectively.
Other data related to Oil and Gas operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Production data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Mbbls)
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
7,404 |
|
|
|
6,023 |
|
Natural gas liquids (Mbbls)
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Natural gas equivalents (MMcfe)
|
|
|
10,216 |
|
|
|
8,682 |
|
Average Sales Price(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil average sales price (per Bbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price including realized gains or losses on derivative contracts
|
|
$ |
55.54 |
|
|
$ |
48.22 |
|
|
Price excluding realized gains or losses on derivative contracts
|
|
|
62.52 |
|
|
|
50.59 |
|
Natural gas average sales price (per Mcf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price including realized gains or losses on derivative contracts
|
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
Price excluding realized gains or losses on derivative contracts
|
|
|
7.34 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
Natural gas liquids (per Bbl)
|
|
|
38.14 |
|
|
|
30.42 |
|
Expense per Mcfe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas operating expenses
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
.50 |
|
|
|
.39 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes the effect of unrealized gains and losses on derivative
contracts. |
30
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2005 |
Gross oil and gas revenues for the first quarter of 2006, before
realized and unrealized derivative gains and losses, increased
$24.9 million, or 44.3%, as compared to the first quarter
of 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to (a) the
increase in volume ($12.8 million) and (b) the
increase in average sales price ($12.1 million). Including
the effects of realized and unrealized derivative gains and
losses, oil and gas revenues increased 640.5% to
$106.3 million in the first quarter of 2006 from
$14.4 million in 2005. Unrealized derivative gains in 2006
were $37.3 million compared to unrealized derivative losses of
$38.8 million in 2005. Unrealized derivative gains and losses
resulted from
mark-to-market
adjustments on our unsettled positions at the end of the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
During the first quarter of 2006, our average realized price of
natural gas, including the effects of realized derivative
losses, increased by 9.2% to $6.05 per Mcf from
$5.54 per Mcf for the first quarter of 2005. Our natural
gas production volume increased by 1.4 Bcf, or 22.9%, to
7.4 Bcf compared to 6.0 Bcf in the first quarter of
2005. Our natural gas production volume increased primarily due
to our successful drilling activity.
During the first quarter of 2006, our average realized price of
oil, including the effects of realized derivative losses,
increased by 15.2% to $55.54 per Bbl from $48.22 per
Bbl for the first quarter of 2005. Our oil production volume
increased by 15 MBbls, or 4.2%, to 368 MBbls compared
to 353 MBbls in the first quarter of 2005. Our oil
production volume increased primarily due to our successful
drilling activity.
Oil and gas operating expenses increased $0.7 million, or
5.1%, to $14.0 million for the first quarter of 2006
compared to $13.4 million for the first quarter of 2005.
Oil and gas operating expenses per Mcfe decreased $0.17, or
11.0%, compared to 2005. The increase in oil and gas operating
expenses is primarily due to an overall increase in costs in the
oil and gas industry combined with an increase in the number of
wells as a result of our drilling activity. This increase is
partially offset by severance tax refunds of $1.8 million
we received in 2006 from drilling wells that qualified for
severance tax exemptions.
Depletion, depreciation and amortization for our oil and gas
segment, or DD&A, increased $3.8 million, or 18.7%, to
$24.1 million during the first quarter of 2006 as compared
to $20.3 million during the first quarter of 2005. DD&A
per Mcfe increased $0.02, or 0.9%, to 2.36 per Mcfe as
compared to $2.34 in 2005.
General and administrative expenses for the oil and gas segment,
or G&A, increased $1.7 million, or 50.6%, to
$5.1 million during the first quarter of 2006 as compared
to $3.4 million during the first quarter of 2005. G&A
per Mcfe increased $0.11, or 28.2%, to $0.50 for 2006 compared
to $0.39 for 2005. The increase in general and administrative
expenses was primarily attributable to the payment of employee
bonuses in the first quarter of 2006.
31
The following table summarizes the key operating data for our
gaming segment for the periods indicated (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino
|
|
$ |
85,372 |
|
|
$ |
85,070 |
|
|
Hotel
|
|
|
20,321 |
|
|
|
18,087 |
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
|
22,475 |
|
|
|
21,942 |
|
|
Tower, retail and other income
|
|
|
8,757 |
|
|
|
8,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross revenues
|
|
|
136,925 |
|
|
|
133,976 |
|
|
Less promotional allowances
|
|
|
10,207 |
|
|
|
11,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
126,718 |
|
|
|
122,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Casino
|
|
|
27,846 |
|
|
|
27,727 |
|
|
Hotel
|
|
|
8,071 |
|
|
|
6,726 |
|
|
Food and beverage
|
|
|
15,278 |
|
|
|
13,942 |
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
4,479 |
|
|
|
3,847 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
42,262 |
|
|
|
42,542 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,427 |
|
|
|
9,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,363 |
|
|
|
104,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
|
$ |
18,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2005 |
Gross revenues increased 2.2% to $136.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 from $134.0 million
for the first quarter of 2005. This increase was primarily
attributable to an increase in business volume, as discussed
below. Las Vegas gross revenues increased 3.3% while gross
revenues from Atlantic City remained flat.
Casino revenues increased 0.4% to $85.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 from $85.1 million
for the first quarter of 2005. Combined slot machine revenues
decreased to $62.8 million, or 73.6% of combined casino
revenues, and combined table game revenues increased to
$19.6 million, or 23.0% of combined casino revenues, for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to
$63.9 million and $17.6 million, respectively, for the
first quarter of 2005. The increase in casino revenues was
primarily due to an increase in the table game handle-and-hold
percentage. Las Vegas casino revenues increased 0.6% while
Atlantic City casino revenues were flat.
Hotel revenues increased 12.4% to $20.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 from $18.1 million
for the first quarter of 2005. This increase was primarily due
to an 11.0% increase in the hotel occupancy rate as a result of
increased midweek room sales and a 1.2% increase in the average
daily room rate. Las Vegas hotel revenues increased 10.4% and
Atlantic City hotel revenues increased 25.9%.
Food and beverage revenues increased 2.4% to $22.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from
$21.9 million for the first quarter of 2005. This increase
was primarily due to an increase in food and beverage covers
partially offset by a slight decrease in the average revenue per
guest check. Las Vegas food and beverage revenues increased 5.8%
and Atlantic City food and beverage revenues decreased 9.5%.
32
Promotional allowances are comprised of the estimated retail
value of goods and services provided to casino customers under
various marketing programs. As a percentage of casino revenues,
promotional allowances decreased to 12.0% from 13.3% for the
first quarter of 2005. This decrease was primarily attributable
to a reduction in benefits for promotional activities related to
slots. Promotional allowances as a percentage of casino revenues
for Las Vegas operations decreased by 0.4% and for Atlantic City
operations decreased by 2.5%.
Casino operating expenses increased by 0.4% to
$27.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 from $27.7 million for the first quarter of 2005. The
increase in casino expenses was primarily due to increased
participation costs and labor costs from the addition of a poker
room at the Stratosphere, partially offset by a reduction in
gaming taxes related to lower gaming revenues in Atlantic City.
Hotel operating expenses increased 20.0% to $8.1 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from $6.7 to
million for the first quarter of 2005. This increase was
primarily due to an increase in labor costs and costs associated
with an increase in occupancy.
Food and beverage operating expenses increased 9.6% to
$15.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 from $13.9 million for the first quarter of 2005. This
increase was primarily due to an increase in food and labor
costs associated with an increase in business volume.
Other operating expenses increased 16.4% to $4.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 from
$3.8 million for the first quarter of 2005. This increase
was primarily due to pre-opening expenses of $0.5 million
related to the acquisition of Flamingo Laughlin Hotel and Casino
and an increase in labor costs associated with the Insanity ride
at the Stratosphere.
Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily consist
of payroll, marketing, advertising, repair and maintenance,
utilities and other administrative expenses. These expenses
decreased 0.7% to $42.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 from $42.5 million for the first
quarter of 2005. This decrease was primarily due to reductions
in advertising, repair and maintenance and tax and license
expenses partially offset by an increase in payroll expenses and
legal fees.
The following is an analysis of revenue and operating income, by
geographical location, for our Gaming segment (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas
|
|
$ |
85,945 |
|
|
$ |
82,838 |
|
Atlantic City
|
|
|
40,773 |
|
|
|
39,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gaming
|
|
$ |
126,718 |
|
|
$ |
122,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas
|
|
$ |
18,623 |
|
|
$ |
20,040 |
|
Atlantic City
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
(1,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gaming
|
|
$ |
19,355 |
|
|
$ |
18,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2005, we began to incur operating losses relating to the
operation of The Sands, one of the casinos included in our
Gaming segment. However, The Sands continues to generate
positive cash flow. We believe that our efforts to improve
profitability will lead to a reversal of these operating losses.
However, as there can be no assurance that our efforts will be
successful, we continue to evaluate whether there is an
impairment under SFAS No. 144. In the event that a
change in operations results in a future reduction of cash
flows, we may determine that an impairment under
SFAS No. 144 has occurred at The Sands, and an
impairment charge may be required. The carrying value of
property, plant and equipment of The Sands at March 31,
2006 was $142.6 million.
33
Our real estate activities comprise three segments:
1) rental real estate, 2) property development, and
3) associated resort activities. The operating performance
of the three segments was as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on financing leases
|
|
$ |
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
1,966 |
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
Property development
|
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
Resort operations
|
|
|
6,082 |
|
|
|
5,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
21,526 |
|
|
|
18,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental real estate
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
Property development
|
|
|
9,976 |
|
|
|
8,185 |
|
|
Resort operations
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
15,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
4,026 |
|
|
$ |
2,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2005 |
Revenues decreased 4.3% to $4.1 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2006 from $4.2 million in the first
quarter of 2005. The decrease was primarily attributable to the
sale of a financing lease property in 2005. Operating expenses
decreased 1.9% to $1.3 million, in the three months ended
March 31, 2006.
We market portions of our commercial real estate portfolio for
sale. Sale activity was as follows (in $000s, except unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Properties sold
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Proceeds received
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
43,464 |
|
Mortgage debt repaid
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
Total gain recorded
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
13,200 |
|
Gain recorded in operations
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
Gain recorded in discontinued operations(i)
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
13,014 |
|
|
|
(i) |
A gain of $5.7 million on the sale of resort properties was
recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2005 in
addition to gains on the rental portfolio. |
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2005 |
Revenues increased by 37.5% to $11.4 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2006 from $8.3 million in the
first quarter of 2005. Operating expenses increased 21.9% to
$10.0 million in the three
34
months ended March 31, 2006 from $8.2 million in the
same period in 2005. In 2006, we sold 12 units with an
average profit margin of 12.4%. In 2005, we sold 30 units
with an average profit margin of 1.1%.
Property development sales activity was as follows (in $000s
except unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
Units sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Seabury, Massachusetts
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Harbor/ Oak Harbor, Florida
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Falling Waters, Florida
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Seabury, Massachusetts
|
|
$ |
9,033 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Grand Harbor/ Oak Harbor, Florida
|
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
Falling Waters, Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,856 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,384 |
|
|
$ |
8,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2005 |
Revenues increased 9.3% to $6.1 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2006 from $5.6 million in first
quarter of 2005. This increase is primarily attributable to
increased club dues. Operating expenses decreased 1.5% to
$6.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2006.
WPI, through its wholly-owned indirect subsidiary, WestPoint
Home, Inc., is engaged in the business of manufacturing,
sourcing, marketing and distributing bed and bath home fashion
products, including among others, sheets, pillowcases,
comforters, blankets, bedspreads, pillows, mattress pads, towels
and related products. WPI recognizes revenue primarily through
the sale of home fashion products to a variety of retail and
institutional customers. WPI also operates 33 retail outlet
stores that sell home fashion products consisting principally of
products manufactured by WPI. In addition, WPI receives a small
portion of its revenues through the licensing of its trade marks.
A recent court order may result in our ownership of WPI being
reduced to less than 50%. If we were to own less than 50% of the
outstanding common stock, we would have to evaluate whether we
should consolidate WPI and our financial statements could be
materially different than those presented as of March 31,
2006 and for the period then ended. (See Note 21.)
35
Summarized statement of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 is as follows (in $000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2006 | |
|
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
243,490 |
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
228,360 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
53,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$ |
(37,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation for the period was $10.4 million, of
which $8.6 million was included in cost of sales and
$1.8 million was included in selling, general and
administrative. For the period, bed product revenues were
$136.0 million and bath product revenues were
$90.5 million. Other sales, consisting primarily of sales
from WPIs retail outlet stores were $17.0 million.
Gross earnings before selling, general and administrative
expenses for the period were $15.1 million and reflect a
gross profit of 6.2%. Selling, general and administrative
expenses were $53.1 million for the period and as a
percentage of net sales represent 21.8%.
Total expenses for the period include $7.7 million of
impairment charges related to the fixed assets of plants that
will be closed and $2.1 million of restructuring charges
(of which approximately $1.2 million relates to severance
and $0.9 million relates to continuing costs related to
closed plants). We expect to continue our restructuring efforts
and, accordingly, expect that restructuring charges and
operating losses will continue to be incurred throughout 2006
and 2007.
If our restructuring efforts are unsuccessful, we may be
required to record additional impairment charges related to the
carrying value of long-lived assets. Additionally, as part of
the restructuring efforts, we expect to record additional
impairment charges as additional plants are closed.
The Holding Company engages in various investment activities.
These activities include those associated with investing our
available liquidity to achieve a current return and activities
designed to earn returns from increases or decreases in the
market price of securities.
In the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we had
significant realized and unrealized gains and losses from
several positions, including short positions and, in 2006,
activity relating to derivative instruments.
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expenses related to the Holding
Company are principally related to payroll and professional fees
and expenses of the Holding Company and include costs related to
the administration of various real estate holdings.
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2005 |
General and administrative costs increased $8.4 million, or
288.7%, to $11.3 million, as compared to $2.9 million
in the prior year due largely to the impact of a compensation
charge related to the cancellation of options
($6.2 million), and higher legal and professional fees.
36
On June 29, 2005, we granted 700,000 nonqualified unit
options to our chief executive officer. The option agreement
permitted our chief executive officer to purchase up to 700,000
of our depositary units at an exercise price of $35 per
unit and vested over a period of eight years. On March 14,
2006, our chief executive officer resigned from that position,
became a director and Vice-Chairman of the Board of API, and was
designated to be principal executive officer. These changes in
status caused the options to be cancelled in accordance with
their terms. In accordance with SFAS 123(R) Share Based
Payment, the cancellation required that any previously
unrecognized compensation cost be recognized at the date of
cancellation and accordingly we recorded a compensation charge
of $6.2 million related to the previously unrecognized
compensation cost.
|
|
|
Interest Income and Expense |
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2005 |
Interest expense increased 32.0% to $30.6 million, during
the three months ended March 31, 2006 as compared to
$23.2 million in the prior year. This increase reflects
higher borrowing levels in 2006 as a result of the issuance of
the $480.0 million senior notes in February 2005. Interest
income was consistent with the prior period due to higher
interest earned on cash balances in the first quarter of 2006
offsetting $5.1 million earned on WPS secured bank debt in
the first quarter of 2005.
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), net |
See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for
discussion of Other Income (Expense).
Minority interest increased $14.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 compared to the comparable
period in the prior year primarily as a result of the impact of
the losses of WPI ($15.1 million).
|
|
|
Effective Income Tax Rate |
We recorded income tax provisions of $8.7 million and
$3.4 million on pre-tax income of $42.6 million and
$11.7 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Our effective income tax rate was
20.3% and 29.0% for the respective periods. The difference
between the effective tax rate and statutory federal rate of 35%
is due principally to income or losses from partnership entities
in which taxes are the responsibility of the partners.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we
paid $0.7 million and $0.2 in income taxes, respectively.
The results of operations for Gaming, Resort operations,
Property Development operations and Home Fashion are seasonal in
nature. Results for Oil & Gas and Rental Real Estate are
generally not seasonal. Generally, our Las Vegas gaming and
entertainment properties are not affected by seasonal trends.
However, we tend to have increased customer flow in the fourth
quarter of the year. Our Atlantic City property is highly
seasonal in nature, with peak activity occurring from May to
September. Resort operations are highly seasonal with peak
activity in Cape Cod from June to September and in Florida from
November to February. Sales activity for our Property
Development operations in Cape Cod and New York typically peak
in late winter and early spring while in Florida our peak
selling season is during the winter months. The Home Fashion
segment experiences its peak sales season in the fall.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Results |
We are a holding company. In addition to cash and cash
equivalents, U.S. government and agency obligations,
marketable equity and debt securities and other short-term
investments, our assets consist primarily of investments in our
subsidiaries. As we continue to make significant investments in
operating
37
businesses, we will reduce the liquid assets at AREP and AREH to
fund those businesses. Consequently, our cash flow and our
ability to meet our debt service obligations and make
distributions with respect to depositary units and preferred
units likely will depend on the cash flow of our subsidiaries
and the payment of funds to us by our subsidiaries in the form
of loans, dividends, distributions or otherwise.
The operating results of our subsidiaries may not be sufficient
to make distributions to us. In addition, our subsidiaries are
not obligated to make funds available to us, and distributions
and intercompany transfers from our subsidiaries to us may be
restricted by applicable law or covenants contained in debt
agreements and other agreements to which these subsidiaries may
be subject or enter into in the future. The terms of any
borrowings of our subsidiaries or other entities in which we own
equity may restrict dividends, distributions or loans to us. For
example, the notes issued by our indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary, ACEP, contain restrictions on dividends and
distributions and loans to us, as well as on other transactions
with us. ACEP also has a credit agreement which contains
financial covenants that have the effect of restricting
dividends or distributions. Our subsidiary, NEG Oil &
Gas has a credit facility which restricts dividends,
distributions and other transactions with us. These agreements
may preclude our receiving payments from the operations of our
Gaming and our Oil and Gas properties which account for a
significant portion of our revenues and cash flows. We are
negotiating similar facilities for WPI, Atlantic Coast and our
real estate development properties which may also restrict
dividends, distributions and other transactions with us. To the
degree any distributions and transfers are impaired or
prohibited, our ability to make payments on our debt will be
limited.
As of March 31, 2006, the Holding Company had a cash and
cash equivalents balance of $175.8 million, short-term
investments of $873.0 million (of which $468.8 million
was invested in highly liquid fixed-income securities) and total
debt of $911.4 million (of which $831.0 million
relates to the senior unsecured notes).
We actively pursue various means to raise cash from our
subsidiaries. To date, such means include payment of dividends
from subsidiaries, obtaining loans or other financings based on
the asset values of subsidiaries or selling debt or equity
securities of subsidiaries through capital market transactions.
As a result of financing transactions at our subsidiaries, we
will face significant limitations on the amounts of cash that we
can receive from subsidiaries. Our ability to make future
interest payments, therefore, will be based on receiving cash
from those subsidiaries that do not have restrictions and from
other financing and liquidity sources available to AREP and AREH.
In February 2005, we issued $480.0 million principal amount
of 7.125% senior notes due 2013. In May 2004, we issued
$353.0 million principal amount of 8.125% senior notes
due 2012. Additionally, in December 2005, NEG Oil & Gas
entered into a revolving credit facility which allows for
borrowings of up to $500.0 million based upon a borrowing
base determination. The borrowing base is $335.0 million,
of which $300.0 million has been borrowed at closing and is
outstanding.
Net cash used in continuing operating activities was
$30.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 as compared to net cash provided by continuing operating
activities of $27.0 million in the prior year. Net cash was
used in continuing operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 due to cash requirements related to short
sales ($40.7 million) and increases in various working
capital asset categories. Our cash and cash equivalents and
investments in marketable equity and debt securities decreased
by $55.6 million at March 31, 2006, from
December 31, 2005, primarily due to net cash used in
operating activities of $29.8 million and capital
expenditures of $56.7 million, offset in part by proceeds
from sales of properties of $7.1 million.
We are continuing to pursue the purchase of assets, including
assets that may not generate positive cash flow, are difficult
to finance or may require additional capital, such as properties
for development, non-performing loans, securities of companies
that are undergoing or that may undergo restructuring, and
companies that are in need of capital. All of these activities
require us to maintain a strong capital base and liquidity.
38
|
|
|
Long-term debt consists of the following (in $000s): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2006 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Senior unsecured 7.125% notes due 2013 AREP
|
|
$ |
480,000 |
|
|
$ |
480,000 |
|
Senior unsecured 8.125% notes due 2012 AREP
|
|
|
351,003 |
|
|
|
350,922 |
|
Senior secured 7.85% notes due 2012 ACEP
|
|
|
215,000 |
|
|
|
215,000 |
|
Borrowings under credit facility NEG Oil &
Gas
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Mortgages payable
|
|
|
80,414 |
|
|
|
81,512 |
|
Other
|
|
|
9,364 |
|
|
|
8,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
1,435,781 |
|
|
|
1,435,821 |
|
Less current portion, including debt related to real estate held
for sale
|
|
|
22,167 |
|
|
|
24,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,413,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,411,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior unsecured notes restrictions and covenants
AREP |
Both of our senior unsecured notes issuances restrict the
payment of cash dividends or distributions, the purchase of
equity interests or the purchase, redemption, defeasance or
acquisition of debt subordinated to the senior unsecured notes.
The notes also restrict the incurrence of debt, or the issuance
of disqualified stock, as defined, with certain exceptions,
provided that we may incur debt or issue disqualified stock if,
immediately after such incurrence or issuance, the ratio of the
aggregate principal amount of all outstanding indebtedness of
AREP and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis to the
tangible net worth of AREP and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis would have been less than 1.75 to 1.0. As of
March 31, 2006, such ratio was less than 1.75 to 1.0, and
accordingly, based on this ratio, we and AREH could have
incurred up to approximately $1.5 billion of additional
indebtedness.
In addition, both issues of notes require that on each quarterly
determination date we and the guarantor of the notes (currently
only AREH) maintain a minimum ratio of cash flow to fixed
charges each as defined, of 1.5 to 1, for the four
consecutive fiscal quarters most recently completed prior to
such quarterly determination date. For the four quarters ended
March 31, 2006, the ratio of cash flow to fixed charges was
in excess of 1.5 to 1.0.
The notes also require, on each quarterly determination date,
that the ratio of total unencumbered assets, as defined, to the
principal amount of unsecured indebtedness, as defined, be
greater than 1.5 to 1.0 as of the last day of the most recently
completed fiscal quarter. As of March 31, 2006, such ratio
was in excess of 1.5 to 1.0.
As of March 31, 2006, we were in compliance with each of
the covenants contained in our senior unsecured notes and expect
to be in compliance with each of the debt covenants for the
period of at least twelve months from such date.
|
|
|
Senior secured 7.85% notes due 2012 ACEP |
ACEPs 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012 restrict
the payment of cash dividends or distributions by ACEP, the
purchase of its equity interests, the purchase, redemption,
defeasance or acquisition of debt subordinated to ACEPs
notes and investments as restricted payments.
ACEPs notes also prohibit the incurrence of debt, or the
issuance of disqualified or preferred stock, as defined, by
ACEP, with certain exceptions, provided that ACEP may incur debt
or issue disqualified stock if, immediately after such
incurrence or issuance, the ratio of consolidated cash flow to
fixed charges (each as defined) for the most recently ended four
full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are
available immediately preceding the date on which such
additional indebtedness is incurred or disqualified stock or
preferred stock is issued would have been at least 2.0 to 1.0,
determined on a pro forma basis giving effect to the debt
incurrence or issuance. As of March 31, 2005, such ratio
was in excess of 2.0 to 1.0. The ACEP notes also restrict the
39
creation of liens, the sale of assets, mergers, consolidations
or sales of substantially all of its assets, the lease or grant
of a license, concession, other agreements to occupy, manage or
use our assets, the issuance of capital stock of restricted
subsidiaries and certain related party transactions. The ACEP
notes allow it to incur indebtedness, among other things, of up
to $50 million under credit facilities, non-recourse
financing of up to $15 million to finance the construction,
purchase or lease of personal or real property used in its
business, permitted affiliate subordinated indebtedness (as
defined), the issuance of additional 7.85% senior secured
notes due 2012 in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
2.0 times net cash proceeds received from equity offerings and
permitted affiliate subordinated debt, and additional
indebtedness of up to $10.0 million.
Additionally, ACEPs senior secured revolving credit
facility allows for borrowings of up to $20.0 million,
including the issuance of letters of credit of up to
$10.0 million. Loans made under the senior secured
revolving facility will mature and the commitments under them
will terminate in January 2008. At March 31, 2006, there
were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under the
facility. The facility contains restrictive covenants similar to
those contained in the 7.85% senior secured notes due 2012.
In addition, the facility requires that, as of the last date of
each fiscal quarter, ACEPs ratio of net property, plant
and equipment for key properties, as defined, to consolidated
first lien debt be not less than 5.0 to 1.0 and ACEPs
ratio of consolidated first lien debt to consolidated cash flow
not be more than 1.0 to 1.0. At March 31, 2006, we were in
compliance with the relevant covenants. On May 10, 2006 we
increased our senior secured revolving credit facility to
$60.0 million on substantially the same terms and
conditions.
The restrictions imposed by ACEPs senior secured notes and
the credit facility likely will limit our receiving payments
from the operations of our principal hotel and gaming properties.
|
|
|
NEG Oil & Gas LLC Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Facility |
On December 22, 2005, NEG Oil & Gas entered into a
credit facility, dated as of December 20, 2005, with
Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent, Bear Stearns
Corporate Lending Inc., as syndication agent, and certain other
lender parties. At March 31, 2006, the interest rate on the
outstanding amount under the credit facility was 6.44%.
Commitment fees for the unused credit facility range from 0.375%
to 0.50% and are payable quarterly.
The credit facility contains covenants that, amongst other
things, restrict the incurrence of indebtedness by NEG
Oil & Gas and its subsidiaries, the creation of liens
by them, hedging contracts, mergers and issuances of securities
by them and distributions and investments by NEG Oil &
Gas and its subsidiaries. It also requires NEG Oil & Gas to
maintain: (1) a ratio of consolidated total debt to
consolidated EBITDA (for the four fiscal quarter period ending
on the date of the consolidated balance sheet used to determine
consolidated total debt), as defined, of not more than 3.5 to
1.0; (2) consolidated tangible net worth, as defined, of
not less than $240 million, plus 50% of consolidated net
income for each fiscal quarter ending after December 31,
2005 for which consolidated net income is positive; and
(3) a ratio of consolidated current assets to consolidated
current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to 1.0. These covenants
may have the effect of limiting distributions by NEG Oil &
Gas. As of March 31, 2006, NEG Oil & Gas was in
compliance with each of the covenants.
On March 15, 2006, our directors voted to approve
managements recommendation to pay a dividend of
$0.10 per depositary unit in the first quarter of 2006. The
first quarter distribution was paid on April 7, 2006 to
depositary unit holders of record at the close of business on
March 27, 2006. On May 10, 2006, the Board of
Directors approved payment of a quarterly cash distribution of
$0.10 per unit on its depositary units for the second
quarter of 2006 consistent with the distribution policy in 2005.
The distribution will be paid on June 1, 2006 to depositary
unitholders of record at the close of business on May 22,
2006.
The payment of future distributions will be determined by the
Board of Directors quarterly, based upon the factors described
above and other factors that it deems relevant at the time that
declaration of a distribution is considered. There can be no
assurance as to whether or in what amounts any future
distributions might be paid.
40
As discussed below, our derivative obligations decreased to
$48.7 million as of March 31, 2006 as compared to
$85.9 million as of December 31, 2005. As of
March 31, 2006, there were no other material changes in our
contractual obligations or any other long-term liabilities
reflected on our consolidated balance sheet as compared to those
reported in our
Form 10-K, as
amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 31, 2006.
As discussed in Note 18 to the consolidated financial
statements, our oil and gas operations have liabilities related
to derivative contracts of $48.7 million at March 31,
2006. The fair value of the derivative contracts that mature in
less than a year is $35.6 million. The amount, if any, that
we will be required to pay with respect to any contract will be
determined at the maturity date and may vary from the fair value
as reported at this time depending on market prices for oil and
gas and the stated contract terms.
As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements, we have entered into derivative contracts. The fair
value of the derivative contracts was an asset of
$14.7 million as of March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements |
We do not maintain any off-balance sheet transactions,
arrangements, obligations or other relationships with
unconsolidated entities or others.
|
|
|
Segment Liquidity and Capital Resources |
NEG Oil & Gas derives its cash primarily from the sale of
oil and natural gas and borrowings. During the three months
ended March 31, 2006, cash flows from operations provided
by our oil and gas segment was $52.6 million compared to
$29.5 million in 2005. The increase was primarily
attributable to higher revenues due to increased production and
higher price realizations.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, our oil and
gas capital expenditures aggregated $50.9 million. NEG Oil
& Gas capital expenditures for the remainder of 2006 are
forecasted to be approximately $149.5 million. The planned
capital expenditures do not include any major acquisitions that
we may consider from time to time and for which NEG Oil &
Gas may need to obtain additional financing.
Historically, we have funded our Oil and Gas capital
expenditures from Oil and Gas operating cash flows and bank
borrowings. Our Oil and Gas operating cash flows may fluctuate
significantly due to changes in oil and gas commodity prices,
production interruptions and other factors. The timing of most
of our oil and gas capital expenditures is discretionary because
we have no long-term capital expenditure commitments. We may
vary our capital expenditures as circumstances warrant in the
future.
Our Gaming segment derives cash primarily from casino, hotel and
related activities. During the three months ended March 31,
2006, cash flows from operations provided by our gaming segment
was $20.3 million compared to $14.9 million in 2005.
The increase from 2005 to 2006 was due to increased revenues. In
addition to cash from operations, cash is available to us, if
necessary, under our separate senior secured revolving credit
facilities for our Atlantic City and Las Vegas subsidiaries. Our
Las Vegas and Atlantic City operations maintain separate credit
facilities. Both facilities are subject to our complying with
financial and other covenants. At March 31, 2006, we had
availability under our credit facilities of $20.0 million
and $5.0 million for Las Vegas and Atlantic City,
respectively, subject to continuing compliance with existing
covenant restrictions. Our Las Vegas facility expires
January 29, 2008 and our Atlantic City facility expires on
November 17, 2007. The cash generated from operations and
credit facilities of our Las Vegas and Atlantic City are not
available to fund one another.
41
Under terms of the senior secured notes of ACEP, the ability to
pay dividends and engage in other transactions with AREP are
limited.
Capital spending for the existing Las Vegas operations was
$2.2 million and $4.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Capital
spending for the Atlantic City operations was $0.6 million
and $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively. We have estimated our combined
capital expenditures for the remainder of 2006 to be
$26.8 million.
On November 29, 2005, AREPs wholly-owned
subsidiaries, AREP Laughlin Corporation, or Laughlin, and AREP
Boardwalk LLC, or Boardwalk, entered into an agreement to
purchase the Flamingo Laughlin Hotel and Casino in Laughlin,
Nevada, and 7.7 acres of land in Atlantic City, New Jersey
from Harrahs Entertainment, for $170.0 million.
Completion of the transaction is subject to regulatory approval
and is expected to close in mid-2006. We contributed Laughlin to
ACEP on April 4, 2006 and the Atlantic City property will
be owned by Boardwalk. ACEP is negotiating to increase its
senior secured revolving credit facility to $60.0 million,
which it plans to utilize, together with their excess cash, to
purchase the Flamingo and fund the additional capital spending
estimated to be approximately $40.0 million through 2008.
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we spent
approximately $1.2 million of the $40.0 million.
The Flamingo owns approximately 18 acres of land located
next to the Colorado River in Laughlin, Nevada and is a
tourist-oriented gaming and entertainment destination property.
The Flamingo features the largest hotel in Laughlin with 1,907
hotel rooms, a 57,000 square foot casino, seven dining
options, 2,420 parking spaces, over 35,000 square feet of
meeting space and a 3,000-seat outdoor amphitheater.
Our real estate operations generate cash through rentals and
leases and asset sales (principally sales of rental properties)
and the operation of resorts. All of these operations generate
cash flows from operations.
Real estate development activities are currently a significant
use of funds. With our renewed development activity at New
Seabury and Grand Harbor, it is expected that cash expenditures
over the next year will approximate $100 million. Such
amounts will be funded through advances from our existing cash
reserves and then from unit sales and, to the extent such
proceeds are insufficient, by AREP from available cash.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, our Home Fashion
segment had a negative cash flow from operations of
$33.6 million. Such negative cash flow was principally due
to ongoing restructuring actions and changes in working capital.
As discussed above, we expect to continue our restructuring
efforts and, accordingly, expect that restructuring charges and
operating losses will continue to be incurred throughout 2006
and 2007.
At March 31, 2006, the Home Fashion segment had
approximately $61.5 million of unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents. Capital spending by WPI was $1.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2006. Capital expenditures
for the remainder of 2006 are expected to total approximately
$10.9 million. Additionally, WPI may expend amounts in
connection with exploring overseas joint ventures and such
amounts may be significant.
WPI is negotiating to obtain a $250.0 million senior
secured revolving credit facility from a third party which, upon
entering into the credit facility, is expected to impose various
operating and financial restrictions on WPI and its
subsidiaries. These restrictions include limitations on
indebtedness, liens, asset sales, transactions with affiliates,
acquisitions, mergers, capital expenditures, dividends and
investments.
42
AREH has made a line of credit available to WPI which matures on
August 8, 2006. The status of the rights offering that was
to have yielded an additional $92 million in equity remains
uncertain pending resolution of the pending litigation with
certain of WPS creditors.
|
|
|
Forward Looking Statements |
Statements included in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
which are not historical in nature are intended to be, and are
hereby identified as, Forward Looking Statements for
purposes of the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by Public Law 104-67.
Forward looking statements regarding managements present
plans or expectations involve risks and uncertainties and
changing economic or competitive conditions, as well as the
negotiation of agreements with third parties, which could cause
results to differ from present plans or expectations, and such
differences could be material. Readers should consider that such
statements speak only as of the date hereof.
Certain Trends and Uncertainties
We have in the past and may in the future make forward looking
statements. Certain of the statements contained in this document
involve risks and uncertainties. Our future results could differ
materially from those statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to
those discussed in this document. These statements are subject
to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those predicted. Also, please see Risk
Factors in our annual report on
Form 10-K, as
amended, for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in
market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our significant
market risks are primarily associated with interest rates,
equity prices and derivatives. Reference is made to
Part II, item 7A of
Form 10-K/ A for
2005 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 31, 2006 for disclosures relating to interest
rates and our equity prices. As of March 31, 2006, there
have been no material changes in the market risks in these two
categories. The following address our market risks associated
with commodity price risks.
Our Home Fashion and Oil and Gas operating units selectively use
commodity futures contracts, forward purchase commodity
contracts, option contracts and price collars
primarily to reduce the risk of changes to cotton and oil and
gas prices. The Holding Company currently holds derivative
instruments for trading purposes.
The Oil and Gas segments revenues are derived from the
sale of its crude oil and natural gas production. The prices for
oil and gas remain extremely volatile and sometimes experience
large fluctuations as a result of relatively small changes in
supply, weather conditions, economic conditions and government
actions. If energy prices decline significantly, revenues and
cash flow would significantly decline. In addition, a noncash
write-down of our oil and gas properties could be required under
full cost accounting rules if prices declined significantly,
even if it is only for a short period of time. From time to
time, we enter into derivative financial instruments to manage
oil and gas price risk related to revenue.
We use price collars to reduce the risk of changes
in oil and gas prices. Under these arrangements, no payments are
due by either party so long as the market price is above the
floor price set in the collar below the ceiling. If the price
falls below the floor, the counter-party to the collar pays the
difference to us and if the price is above the ceiling, the
counter-party receives the difference from us.
See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for
details on our commodity price collar agreements.
43
|
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
As of March 31, 2006, our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
and our subsidiaries disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to the Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e). Based upon
such evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are currently effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms, and include controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the first quarter of 2006, we continued to implement
processes to address a significant deficiency in our
consolidation process noted by management in 2004 during its
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal controls
over financial reporting. These processes included the
implementation and testing of our new accounting and
consolidation program and continuing to retain the services of
an independent consultant to evaluate the effectiveness of our
internal controls. We continue to monitor the progress of our
subsidiaries in implementing processes to correct any
significant deficiencies noted in their disclosure and control
procedures.
During the third quarter of 2005, we identified a significant
deficiency related to our periodic reconciliation, review and
analysis of investment accounts. This significant deficiency is
not believed to be a material weakness and arose from a lack of
monitoring and review controls. We have hired additional
resources in order to provide the appropriate level of control.
|
|
|
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
There have not been any changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2006
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
We are from time to time parties to various legal proceedings
arising out of our businesses. We believe however, that other
than the proceedings discussed below, there are no proceedings
pending or threatened against us which, if determined adversely,
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or liquidity.
On April 4, 2006, certain creditors of GB Holdings, Inc.,
or GBH filed a proposed Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
Statement in which they have indicated that they intend to
challenge the transaction in July 2004 that, among other things,
resulted in the transfer of The Sands to ACE Gaming LLC, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Atlantic Holdings, the exchange of
certain of GBHs notes for 3% senior secured convertible
notes of Atlantic Coast, and, our owning 58.2% of the
outstanding Atlantic Coast shares as of March 31, 2006. If they
succeed in challenging these transactions, the creditors intend
to seek to rescind the July 2004 transactions and attempt to
equitably subordinate, in bankruptcy, AREPs claims against
GBH to the claims of such creditors. Under the plan, they
propose to place all of the assets of GBH in a Liquidating Trust
for the benefit of the creditors. The Trust would be managed by
a five-member board,
four of whom would be appointed by the creditors and one of whom
is appointed by a limited group of equity holders of GBH that
would not include us. The assets that would be placed in the
Trust include the 2,882,938 shares of Atlantic
44
Coast stock owned by GBH as well as any litigation claims owned
by the debtor or the estate, including any claims challenging
the July 2004 transactions. We intend to file an objection to
the proposed plan.
The GBH bankruptcy is in its preliminary stages and we cannot
predict the outcome of the case or the potential impact on us.
In November and December 2005, the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York rendered a decision in
Contrarian Funds Inc. v. WestPoint Stevens, Inc.
et al., and issued orders reversing certain provisions
of the bankruptcy court order pursuant to which we acquired our
ownership of a majority of the common stock of a newly formed
company, WPI. WPI acquired substantially all of the assets of
WPS. On April 13, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court entered a
remand order which provides, among other things, that all of the
shares and rights to acquire shares of WPI issued to us and the
other first lien lenders or held in escrow pursuant to court
order constituted replacement collateral, other than
5,250,000 shares that we acquired for cash. The
5,250,000 shares represent approximately 27% of the
19,498,389 shares of WPI now outstanding. According to the
remand order, we would share pro rata with the other
first lien lenders in proceeds realized from the disposition of
the replacement collateral and, to the extent there is remaining
replacement collateral after satisfying first lien lender
claims, we would share pro rata with the other second
lien lenders in any further proceeds. We were holders of
approximately 39.99% of the outstanding first lien debt and
approximately 51.21% of the outstanding second lien debt. On
April 13, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court also entered an order
staying the remand order pending its appeal. The other first
lien lenders have filed a notice of appeal of the remand order,
and have filed a motion with the District Court to lift the stay
entered by the Bankruptcy Court. We have filed a notice of
appeal of the remand order and an objection to the motion to
lift the stay. We also intend to appeal the prior order that
modified and vacated portions of the original sale order.
We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the
ultimate impact on our investment in WPI or the business
prospects of WPI.
In addition to the risk factor set forth below, the discussion
of our business and operations should be read together with the
risk factors contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report of
Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2006, and
amended on March 31, 2006, which describe various risks and
uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. This report
is available, without charge, on our website,
http://www.areplp.com/investor.shtml as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC.
These risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our
business, financial condition, results of operations, cash
flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner.
Home Fashion
A recent court order may result in our ownership of WPI
being reduced to less than 50%. Uncertainties arising from this
decision may adversely affect WPIs operations and
prospects and the value of our investment in it.
In November and December 2005, the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York rendered a decision in
Contrarian Funds Inc. v. WestPoint Stevens, Inc.
et al., and issued orders reversing certain provisions
of the bankruptcy court order pursuant to which we acquired our
ownership of a majority of the common stock of a newly formed
company, WPI. WPI acquired substantially all of the assets of
WPS. On April 13, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court entered a
remand order which provides, among other things, that all of the
shares and rights to acquire shares of WPI issued to us and the
other first lien lenders or held in escrow pursuant to court
order constituted replacement collateral, other than
5,250,000 shares that we acquired for cash. The
5,250,000 shares represent approximately 27% of the
19,498,389 shares of WPI now outstanding. According to the
remand order, we would share pro rata with the other
first lien lenders in proceeds realized from the disposition of
the replacement collateral and, to the extent there is remaining
replacement collateral
45
after satisfying first lien lender claims, we would share pro
rata with the other second lien lenders in any further
proceeds. We were holders of approximately 39.99% of the
outstanding first lien debt and approximately 51.21% of the
outstanding second lien debt. The Bankruptcy Court entered an
order staying the remand order pending its appeal. The other
first lien lenders have filed a notice of appeal of the remand
order, and have filed a motion with the District Court to lift
the stay entered by the Bankruptcy Court. We have filed a notice
of an appeal of the remand order and an objection to the motion
to lift the stay. We also intend to appeal the prior order that
modified and vacated portions of the original sale order.
We currently own approximately 67.7% of the outstanding shares
of common stock of WPI. As a result of the District Courts
order and the proceedings on remand, our percentage of the
outstanding shares of common stock of WPI could be reduced to
less than 50% and perhaps substantially less. If we were to lose
control of WPI, it could adversely affect the business and
prospects of WPI and the value of our investment in it. In
addition, we consolidated the results and balance sheet of WPI
as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 and for the
period from the date of acquisition through March 31, 2006.
If we were to own less than 50% of the outstanding common stock,
we would have to evaluate whether we should consolidate WPI and
our financial statements could be materially different than as
presented as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005
and for the periods then ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
46
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P. |
|
|
By: American Property Investors, Inc., its general partner |
|
|
|
|
|
Jon F. Weber |
|
President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal |
|
Financial Officer and duly authorized officer) |
Date: May 10, 2006
47