10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 2, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-16617
ALTERA CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
77-0016691 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
101 INNOVATION DRIVE
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
408-544-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at April 14, 2010: 301,656,409
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: Financial Statements
ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands, except par value amount) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,738,375 |
|
|
$ |
1,546,672 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
360,135 |
|
|
|
218,144 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
87,319 |
|
|
|
69,705 |
|
Deferred income taxes current |
|
|
80,337 |
|
|
|
79,164 |
|
Deferred compensation plan marketable securities |
|
|
49,634 |
|
|
|
50,905 |
|
Deferred compensation plan restricted cash equivalents |
|
|
18,940 |
|
|
|
18,986 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
59,721 |
|
|
|
58,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
2,394,461 |
|
|
|
2,041,770 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
169,023 |
|
|
|
174,516 |
|
Deferred income taxes non-current |
|
|
55,057 |
|
|
|
59,249 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
18,828 |
|
|
|
17,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,637,369 |
|
|
$ |
2,293,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
66,554 |
|
|
$ |
50,520 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
21,586 |
|
|
|
32,256 |
|
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
52,880 |
|
|
|
49,862 |
|
Deferred compensation plan obligations |
|
|
68,574 |
|
|
|
69,891 |
|
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors |
|
|
399,869 |
|
|
|
281,885 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,913 |
|
|
|
5,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
613,376 |
|
|
|
489,961 |
|
Income taxes payable non-current |
|
|
203,057 |
|
|
|
210,967 |
|
Long-term credit facility |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
7,435 |
|
|
|
6,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,323,868 |
|
|
|
1,207,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See Note 10-Commitments and Contingencies) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares
authorized; outstanding 301,173 at April 2, 2010 and
296,817 shares at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
465,307 |
|
|
|
372,098 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
847,893 |
|
|
|
712,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,313,501 |
|
|
|
1,085,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,637,369 |
|
|
$ |
2,293,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
402,295 |
|
|
$ |
264,602 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
114,936 |
|
|
|
94,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
287,359 |
|
|
|
170,573 |
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
64,340 |
|
|
|
58,190 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense |
|
|
62,181 |
|
|
|
60,659 |
|
Compensation expense deferred compensation plan |
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Gain on deferred compensation plan securities |
|
|
(2,228 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(3,378 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
160,139 |
|
|
|
53,764 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
9,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
153,173 |
|
|
$ |
43,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
298,566 |
|
|
|
293,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
304,327 |
|
|
|
294,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
ALTERA CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
153,173 |
|
|
$ |
43,961 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,066 |
|
|
|
7,516 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
14,062 |
|
|
|
15,842 |
|
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
909 |
|
|
|
1,838 |
|
Tax effect of employee stock plans |
|
|
3,105 |
|
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from employee stock plans |
|
|
(1,828 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Gain on substantive termination of retiree medical plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,488 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(141,991 |
) |
|
|
(98,690 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(17,614 |
) |
|
|
21,304 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(2,694 |
) |
|
|
19,385 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
11,477 |
|
|
|
(10,399 |
) |
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors |
|
|
117,984 |
|
|
|
39,908 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(7,434 |
) |
|
|
7,551 |
|
Deferred compensation plan obligations |
|
|
(3,545 |
) |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
132,670 |
|
|
|
43,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
|
(4,553 |
) |
Sales (purchases) of deferred compensation plan securities, net |
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
(3,327 |
) |
Purchases of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
(8,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through various stock plans |
|
|
77,482 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
Shares withheld for employee taxes |
|
|
(4,784 |
) |
|
|
(3,783 |
) |
Payment of dividends to stockholders |
|
|
(14,873 |
) |
|
|
(14,663 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Principal payments on capital lease obligations |
|
|
(2,627 |
) |
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
57,026 |
|
|
|
(18,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
191,703 |
|
|
|
17,548 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,546,672 |
|
|
|
1,216,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,738,375 |
|
|
$ |
1,234,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
ALTERA CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Organization and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Altera Corporation and its
subsidiaries, collectively referred to herein as Altera, we, us, or our, have been prepared
by us in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information. This financial information reflects all
adjustments which are, in the opinion of our management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary
for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. The December 31, 2009 consolidated
balance sheet data was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in our
2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The
consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as those of our wholly-owned
subsidiaries after elimination of all significant inter-company balances and transactions.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as filed on February 17, 2010 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The consolidated operating results for the three months ended April 2, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.
Note 2 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted in the Three Months Ended April 2, 2010
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance on
fair value measurements and disclosures. The new guidance requires additional disclosures regarding
fair value measurements, amends disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets, and provides
clarification regarding the level of disaggregation of fair value disclosures by investment class.
This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2009, except for certain Level 3 activity disclosure requirements that will be effective for
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Accordingly, we adopted this amendment in the
quarter ended April 2, 2010, except for the additional Level 3 requirements which will be adopted
in 2011. See Note 15 Fair Value of Financial Instruments to our consolidated financial
statements.
Subsequent Events
In February 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended
guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events
have been evaluated in originally issued
and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted this
new guidance in the quarter ended April 2, 2010. See Note 16 Subsequent Event to our consolidated
financial statements.
6
Note 3 Accounts Receivable, Net and Significant Customers
Accounts receivable, net was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Gross accounts receivable |
|
$ |
361,109 |
|
|
$ |
218,647 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Allowance for sales returns |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
360,135 |
|
|
$ |
218,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We sell our products to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and to electronic
components distributors who resell these products to OEMs, or their subcontract manufacturers. Net
sales by customer type and net sales to significant customers were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
(Percentage of Net Sales) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to distributors |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
Sales to OEMs |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Distributors(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrow Electronics, Inc. ( Arrow) |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
Macnica, Inc. (Macnica) |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Except as presented above, no other distributor accounted for greater than 10% of
our net sales for the three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009. |
No individual OEM accounted for more than 10% of our net sales for the three months ended
April 2, 2010, while Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., an OEM, individually accounted for 12% of our
net sales for the three months ended March 27, 2009. No other individual OEM accounted for more
than 10% of our net sales for the three months ended March 27, 2009.
As of April 2, 2010, accounts receivable from Arrow, Macnica and Avnet, Inc. including its
affiliates (Avnet) individually accounted for approximately 34%, 35% and 11%, respectively, of
our total accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2009, accounts receivable from Arrow, Macnica and
Avnet, individually accounted for approximately 36%, 21% and 14%, respectively, of our total
accounts receivable. No other distributor or OEM accounted for more than 10% of our accounts
receivable as of April 2, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
7
Note 4 Inventories
Inventories were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
8,281 |
|
|
$ |
7,158 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
50,985 |
|
|
|
39,652 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
28,053 |
|
|
|
22,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
87,319 |
|
|
$ |
69,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 Property and Equipment
Property and equipment, net was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Land and land rights |
|
$ |
23,108 |
|
|
$ |
23,108 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
146,868 |
|
|
|
152,557 |
|
Equipment and software |
|
|
216,068 |
|
|
|
213,187 |
|
Office furniture and fixtures |
|
|
23,989 |
|
|
|
20,798 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
|
6,930 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
|
418,653 |
|
|
|
418,044 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(249,630 |
) |
|
|
(243,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
169,023 |
|
|
$ |
174,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense includes the amortization of assets recorded under capital leases.
Depreciation expense was $7.0 million and $7.5 million for the three months ended April 2, 2010 and
March 27, 2009, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense as presented in our
consolidated statements of cash flows includes the above amounts, together with amortization
expense on our intangible assets. Intangible asset amortization expense was not significant for any
period presented in our consolidated statements of income.
Assets held under capital leases, included in Equipment and software as presented above,
totaled $7.5 million (net of accumulated amortization of $8.0 million) as of April 2, 2010 and $8.6
million (net of accumulated amortization of $6.9 million) as of December 31, 2009.
Note 6 Deferred Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue on shipment to distributors |
|
$ |
489,849 |
|
|
$ |
363,448 |
|
Deferred cost of sales on shipment to distributors |
|
|
(35,694 |
) |
|
|
(28,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income on shipment to distributors |
|
|
454,155 |
|
|
|
334,477 |
|
Advances to distributors |
|
|
(62,776 |
) |
|
|
(60,877 |
) |
Other deferred revenue (1) |
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
8,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
399,869 |
|
|
$ |
281,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Principally represents revenue deferred on our software and intellectual property
licenses. |
8
The Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributor activity for the three months ended
April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
281,885 |
|
|
$ |
205,674 |
|
Deferred revenue recognized upon shipment to distributors |
|
|
1,846,658 |
|
|
|
968,215 |
|
Deferred costs of sales recognized upon shipment to distributors |
|
|
(99,028 |
) |
|
|
(73,536 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in advances to distributors |
|
|
(1,899 |
) |
|
|
48,103 |
|
Revenue recognized upon sell-through to end customers |
|
|
(305,489 |
) |
|
|
(203,426 |
) |
Costs of sales recognized upon sell-through to end customers |
|
|
84,689 |
|
|
|
64,871 |
|
Earned distributor price concessions (1) |
|
|
(1,388,277 |
) |
|
|
(706,867 |
) |
Returns |
|
|
(18,875 |
) |
|
|
(57,712 |
) |
Increase in other deferred revenue |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
399,869 |
|
|
$ |
245,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Average aggregate price concessions typically range from 65% to 80% of our list price
on an annual basis, depending upon the composition of our sales, volumes, and factors
associated with timing of shipments to distributors. |
Distributor advances, included in Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors in
our consolidated balance sheets, totaled $62.8 million as of April 2, 2010 and $60.9 million as of
December 31, 2009. We sell the majority of our products to distributors worldwide at a list price.
However, distributors resell our products to end customers at a very broad range of individually
negotiated prices based on a variety of factors, including customer, product, quantity, geography
and competitive differentiation. The majority of our distributors sales to their customers are
priced at a discount from our list price. Under these circumstances, we remit back to the
distributor a portion of its original purchase price after the resale transaction is completed and
we validate the distributors resale information, including end customer, device, quantity and
price, against the distributor price concession that we have approved in advance. To receive price
concessions, distributors must submit the price concession claims to us for approval within 60 days
of the resale of the product to an end customer. It is our practice to apply these negotiated
price discounts to future purchases, requiring the distributor to settle receivable balances, on a
current basis, generally within 30 days, for amounts originally invoiced. This practice has an
adverse impact on the working capital of our distributors. As such, we have entered into agreements
with certain distributors whereby we advance cash to the distributors to reduce the distributors
working capital requirements. These advances are settled in cash at least on a quarterly basis and
are estimated based on the amount of ending inventory as reported by the distributor multiplied by
a negotiated percentage. Such advances have no impact on revenue recognition or our consolidated
statements of income and are a component of Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors
on our consolidated balance sheets. We continuously process discounts taken by distributors against
our Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors. We adjust the recorded amount of the
distributor advances based on cash settlements at the end of each quarter. These advances are set
forth in binding legal agreements and are unsecured, bear no interest on unsettled balances, and
are due upon demand. The agreements governing these advances can be cancelled by us at any time.
9
We also enter into arrangements that, in substance, finance distributors accounts receivable
and inventory. The amounts advanced are classified as Other current assets in our consolidated
balance sheets and totaled $42.3 million as of April 2, 2010 and $33.0 million as of December 31,
2009. These arrangements are set forth in binding legal agreements and are unsecured, bear no
interest on unsettled balances, and are due upon demand.
Note 7 Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
153,173 |
|
|
$ |
43,961 |
|
Reversal of accumulated unrecognized loss on retiree medical plan, net of tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
153,173 |
|
|
$ |
45,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8 Income Per Share
A reconciliation of basic and diluted income per share is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
153,173 |
|
|
$ |
43,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted shares outstanding |
|
|
298,566 |
|
|
|
293,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
153,173 |
|
|
$ |
43,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted shares outstanding |
|
|
298,566 |
|
|
|
293,105 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options, ESPP, and restricted stock unit shares |
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted shares outstanding |
|
|
304,327 |
|
|
|
294,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In applying the treasury stock method, we excluded 10.6 million and 33.9 million stock option
shares for the three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009, respectively, because their
effect was anti-dilutive. While these stock option shares are currently anti-dilutive, they could
be dilutive in the future. All restricted stock units outstanding as of April 2, 2010 and March 27,
2009 were included in our treasury stock method calculation.
10
Note 9 Long-term Credit Facility
Our total borrowings under our $750 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the
Facility) as of April 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $500 million. Borrowings under the
Facility bear interest at either a Eurodollar rate (LIBOR) or a Prime rate, at our option, plus
an applicable margin based upon certain financial ratios, determined and payable quarterly. The
interest rate as of April 2, 2010 was LIBOR plus 0.425%. In addition, we pay a facility fee on the
entire Facility. This facility fee varies with certain financial ratios and was 0.125% as of April
2, 2010. The principal amount of borrowings, together with accrued interest, is due on the maturity
date in August 2012. As of April 2, 2010, $250 million was available under the Facility.
The terms of the Facility require compliance with certain financial covenants that require us
to maintain specified financial ratios related to interest coverage and financial leverage. As of
April 2, 2010, we were in compliance with all such covenants.
Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification and Product Warranty
We
indemnify certain customers, distributors, suppliers, and
subcontractors for attorneys fees
and damages and costs awarded against these parties in certain circumstances in which our products
are alleged to infringe third party intellectual property rights including patents, trade secrets,
trademarks, or copyrights. We cannot estimate the amount of potential future payments, if any, that
we might be required to make as a result of these agreements. To date, we have not paid any claim
or been required to defend any action related to our indemnification obligations, and accordingly,
we have not accrued any amounts for such indemnification obligations. However, we may record
charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations.
We generally warrant our devices for one year, against defects in materials, workmanship and
material non-conformance to our specifications. We accrue for known warranty issues if a loss is probable
and can be reasonably estimated, and accrue for estimated but unidentified issues based on
historical activity. If there is a material increase in customer claims compared with our
historical experience or if the costs of servicing warranty claims are greater than expected, we
may record a charge against cost of sales.
Purchase Obligations
We depend entirely upon subcontractors to manufacture our silicon wafers and provide assembly
and test services. Due to lengthy subcontractor lead times, we must order these materials and
services from these subcontractors well in advance, and we are obligated to pay for the materials
and services once they are completed. As of April 2, 2010, we had approximately $180.0 million of
outstanding purchase commitments to such subcontractors. We expect to receive and pay for
these materials and services over the next six months.
11
Legal Proceedings
We are named as a party to a lawsuit concerning our historical stock option practices and
related accounting and reporting.
In May and July 2006, we were notified that three shareholder derivative lawsuits had been
filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, by persons
identifying themselves as Altera shareholders and purporting to act on behalf of Altera, naming
Altera Corporation as a nominal defendant and naming some of our current and former officers and
directors as defendants. On July 12, 2006, one of these derivative actions was voluntarily
dismissed by the plaintiff shareholder. The remaining two derivative lawsuits pending in Santa
Clara Superior Court were consolidated into a single action on September 5, 2006. Plaintiffs filed
a second amended consolidated complaint on December 15, 2006. On January 30, 2007, Altera and the
defendants filed a motion to stay this action pending resolution of the federal derivative action
(discussed below). On February 11, 2009, one of the remaining derivative plaintiffs voluntarily
dismissed his derivative claims and, on March 20, 2009, the other remaining derivative plaintiff
filed a third amended complaint. In June 2009, Altera and the defendants demurred to the third
amended complaint. After the court issued a tentative ruling in favor of Altera, the parties
agreed to stay the action in order to allow plaintiff to serve a demand on Alteras board of
directors. The plaintiff served the demand on November 4, 2009. The board of directors has
completed its review of the demand and has decided to reject the plantiffs demand.
Plaintiff asserts claims against the individual defendants for breach of fiduciary duty, waste
of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, violations of California Corporation Code section 25402,
breach of fiduciary duty for insider selling and misappropriation of information, and deceit.
Plaintiffs claims concern the granting of stock options by Altera between 1994 and 2001 and the
alleged filing of false and misleading financial statements between 1994 and 2006. All of these
claims are asserted derivatively on behalf of Altera. Plaintiff seeks, among other relief, an
indeterminate amount of damages from the individual defendants and a judgment directing Altera to
reform its corporate governance practices.
During the months of May, June, and July 2006, four other derivative lawsuits were filed by
purported Altera shareholders, on behalf of Altera, in the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California. On August 8, 2006, these actions were consolidated, and the
plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on November 30, 2006. On September 15, 2008, the
plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to dismiss the case. On September 18, 2008, the court entered an
order dismissing the case.
Note 11 Stock-Based Compensation
Our stock-based compensation plans include the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan)
and the 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP).
2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
Our equity incentive program is a broad-based, long-term retention program intended to
attract, motivate, and retain talented employees as well as align stockholder and employee
interests. The 2005 Plan provides stock-based incentive compensation (awards) to both our
eligible employees and non-employee directors. Awards that may be granted under the
2005 Plan include non-qualified and incentive stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs),
performance-based restricted stock units (PRSUs), restricted stock awards, stock appreciation
rights, and stock bonus awards. To date, awards granted under the 2005 Plan consist of stock
options, RSUs and PRSUs. The majority of stock-based awards granted under the 2005 Plan vest over
four years. Stock options, RSUs and PRSUs granted under the 2005 Plan have a maximum contractual
term of ten years. As of April 2, 2010, the 2005 Plan had a total of 27.8 million shares reserved
for future issuance, of which 17.4 million shares were available for future grants.
12
A summary of activity for our RSUs and PRSUs for the three months ended April, 2, 2010 and
information regarding RSUs and PRSUs outstanding and expected to vest as of April 2, 2010 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
(In thousands, except per share |
|
Number of |
|
|
Fair Market Value |
|
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
amounts and terms) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Term (in Years) |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
6,952 |
|
|
$ |
19.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants |
|
|
615 |
|
|
$ |
23.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
$ |
19.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
$ |
19.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, April 2, 2010 |
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
$ |
19.73 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
158,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, April 2, 2010 |
|
|
5,957 |
|
|
$ |
19.73 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
139,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the closing price per share of our stock on April 2,
2010, multiplied by the number of RSUs and PRSUs outstanding or vested and expected to vest as of
April 2, 2010. |
A summary of stock option activity for the three months ended April, 2, 2010 and information
regarding stock options outstanding, exercisable, and vested and expected to vest as of April 2,
2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
(In thousands, except per share |
|
Number of |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Remaining Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
amounts and terms) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Term (in Years) |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
|
|
30,834 |
|
|
$ |
21.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants |
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
21.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercises |
|
|
(3,893 |
) |
|
$ |
19.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled/Expired |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
$ |
26.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, April 2, 2010 |
|
|
26,797 |
|
|
$ |
22.14 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
55,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, April 2, 2010 |
|
|
26,136 |
|
|
$ |
22.19 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
53,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, April 2, 2010 |
|
|
26,741 |
|
|
$ |
22.15 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
55,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For those stock options with an exercise price below the closing price per share on April
2, 2010, aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and the
closing price per share of our common stock on April 2, 2010, multiplied by the number of stock
options outstanding, exercisable, or vested and expected to vest as of April 2, 2010. |
For the three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009, 3.9 million and 0.2 million
non-qualified stock option shares were exercised, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised for the three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009 was $17.9 million and
$0.6 million, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the
exercise price and the selling price received by option holders upon the exercise of stock options
during the period. The total cash received from employees as a result of employee stock option
exercises during the three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009 was $77.5 million and $2.3
million, respectively.
13
1987 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
Our ESPP has two consecutive, overlapping twelve-month offering periods, with a new period
commencing on the first trading day on or after May 1 and November 1 of each year and terminating
on the last trading day on or before April 30 and October 31. Each twelve-month offering period
generally includes two six-month purchase periods. The purchase price at which shares are sold
under the ESPP is 85% of the lower of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on
(1) the first day of the offering period, or (2) the last trading day of the purchase period. If
the fair market value at the end of any purchase period is less than the fair market value at the
beginning of the offering period, each participant is automatically withdrawn from the current
offering period following the purchase of shares on the purchase date and is automatically
re-enrolled in the immediately following offering period.
There were no shares sold to employees under our ESPP during the three months ended April 2,
2010. As of April 2, 2010, 2.2 million shares were available for future issuance under the ESPP.
VALUATION AND EXPENSE INFORMATION
The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of RSUs and PRSUs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
Weighted-average estimated fair value |
|
$ |
22.91 |
|
|
$ |
14.31 |
|
In addition, we apply an expected forfeiture rate when amortizing stock-based compensation
expense. Our stock-based compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of income for
the three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
6,153 |
|
|
|
6,654 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative |
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
8,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
14,062 |
|
|
|
15,842 |
|
Less: income tax benefit |
|
|
(4,027 |
) |
|
|
(4,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
10,035 |
|
|
$ |
11,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No stock-based compensation was capitalized during any period presented above. As of April 2,
2010, unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to outstanding unvested stock options,
RSUs, PRSUs and ESPP shares that are expected to vest was approximately $97.5 million. This
unrecognized stock-based compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of approximately 2.4 years. To the extent the actual forfeiture rate is different from what
we have anticipated, stock-based compensation related to these awards will be different from our
expectations.
14
Note 12 Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate reflects the impact of a significant amount of our earnings being taxed
in foreign jurisdictions at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate. Our effective tax rate for the
three months ended April 2, 2010 was 4.3%, compared with 18.2% for the three months ended March 27,
2009. The significant net decrease in our effective tax rate in the quarter ended April 2, 2010 was
primarily due to the impact of certain discrete tax adjustments. We reversed $11.7 million of
liabilities for uncertain tax positions during the three month period ended April 2, 2010 as a
result of a court ruling issued on March 22, 2010 which held that
stock-based compensation was not
required to be included in certain transfer pricing arrangements between a U.S. company and its
foreign subsidiary. In addition, we reversed $3.4 million of liabilities for uncertain tax
positions due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for
certain foreign jurisdictions. The decrease in our effective tax rate
in the quarter was also due to the impact of proportionately higher
earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates below the U.S.
statutory tax rate, partially offset by the increase in the effective
tax rate due to the expiration of the U.S. Federal Research and
Development Tax Credit.
We file income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and in various states and
foreign jurisdictions. The IRS has completed field examinations of our tax returns for 2002 through
2004 and has issued a notice of proposed adjustment seeking additional taxes of approximately $34.5
million (excluding interest) for those years. We paid $18.0 million to the IRS in 2008,
representing a payment on bond for items associated with the IRS field examinations for 2002
through 2004. We are contesting through the administrative process the IRS claims regarding our
2002 through 2004 tax years. In addition, the IRS has completed field examinations of our tax
returns for 2005 through 2007 and has issued a notice of proposed adjustment seeking additional
taxes of approximately $34.3 million (excluding interest) for those years. We are contesting
through the administrative process the IRS claims regarding our 2005 through 2007 tax years. Other
significant jurisdictions in which we may be subject to examination for fiscal years 2002 forward
include China (including Hong Kong), Ireland, Japan, and the state of California. As mentioned
below, we believe we have made adequate tax payments and/or accrued adequate amounts such that the
outcome of these audits will have no material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results.
Due to the potential resolution of federal, state and foreign examinations, and the expiration of
various statutes of limitations, it is possible that our gross unrecognized tax benefits may change
within the next twelve months.
We maintain liabilities for uncertain tax positions. These liabilities involve considerable
judgment and estimation and are continuously monitored by management based on the best information
available, including changes in tax regulations, the outcome of relevant court cases, and other
information. We are currently under examination by various taxing authorities. Although the outcome
of any tax audit is uncertain, we believe we have adequately provided in our consolidated financial
statements for any additional taxes that we may be required to pay as a result of such
examinations. If the payment ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of these tax
liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period we determine such
liabilities are no longer necessary. However, if an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our estimate of
tax liabilities, additional tax expense will be recorded. The impact of such adjustments could have
a material impact on our results of operations in future periods.
As
of April 2, 2010, we had $235.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits. On December 31, 2009,
we had $244.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as
to when cash settlements with the relevant taxing authorities will occur.
15
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in our income tax
provision. We had accrued approximately $43.1 million and $47.1 million for the payment of interest
and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as of April 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively.
Note 13 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
We allow our U.S.-based officers and director-level employees to defer a portion of their
compensation under the Altera Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (NQDC Plan).
Our Retirement Plans Committee administers the NQDC Plan. As of April 2, 2010, there were
approximately 122 participants in the NQDC Plan who self-direct their investments, subject to
certain limitations. In the event we become insolvent, the NQDC Plan assets are subject to the
claims of our general creditors. Since the inception of the NQDC Plan, we have not made any
contributions to the NQDC Plan and we have no commitments to do so in the future. There are no NQDC
Plan provisions that provide for any guarantees or minimum return on investments. NQDC Plan
participants are prohibited from investing NQDC Plan contributions in Altera common stock. The
balance of the NQDC Plan assets and related obligations was $68.6 million and $69.9 million as of
April 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Investment income or loss earned by the NQDC Plan is recorded as (Gain) loss on deferred
compensation plan securities in our consolidated statements of income. The investment (gain) loss
also represents a (increase) decrease in the future payout to participants and is recorded as
Compensation expense (benefit) deferred compensation plan in our consolidated statements of
income. Compensation expense (benefit) associated with our NQDC Plan obligations is offset by
(gain) loss from related securities. The net effect of investment income or loss and related
compensation expense or benefit has no impact on our income before income taxes, net income, or
cash balances.
Note 14 Restructuring Charges
During the three months ended March 27, 2009, we announced a net reduction of approximately 33
positions which represented 1.2% of our workforce. We incurred restructuring-related charges of
approximately $5.2 million in the three months ended March 27, 2009. The charges were comprised of
employee severance costs of approximately $2.9 million and charges related to the termination of
certain external sales representatives of approximately $2.3 million.
No significant restructuring activities were initiated in the first quarter of 2010. We
anticipate that the remaining restructuring obligations of $0.7 million as of April 2, 2010 will be
substantially paid prior to December 31, 2010.
16
Note 15 Fair Value Measurements
We define fair value as the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
This is sometimes referred to as an exit price. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, also taking into
consideration the principal or most advantageous market in which market participants would transact
and the market based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing
the asset or liability, such as inherent risk and credit risk. We apply the following fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
|
Level 1 |
|
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop our own
assumptions |
This hierarchy requires us to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the
use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, we measure certain
financial assets and liabilities at fair value, which consist of our cash equivalents and
marketable securities.
The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments which was determined
by using the following inputs as of April 2, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of April 2, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for Identical |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
1,659,859 |
|
|
$ |
1,659,859 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash equivalents |
|
|
18,940 |
|
|
|
18,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
20,651 |
|
|
|
20,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
23,718 |
|
|
|
22,839 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,728,433 |
|
|
$ |
1,722,289 |
|
|
$ |
6,144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for Identical |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds |
|
$ |
1,450,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,450,112 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan assets:(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash equivalents |
|
|
18,986 |
|
|
|
18,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
22,530 |
|
|
|
22,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
5,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
|
23,373 |
|
|
|
22,523 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,520,003 |
|
|
$ |
1,514,151 |
|
|
$ |
5,852 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in Cash and cash equivalents in our consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in Deferred compensation plan marketable securities and Deferred compensation
plan restricted cash equivalents in our consolidated balance sheets. |
17
Our cash equivalents and investment securities are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices, broker or dealer
quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types
of instruments valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include money market
securities, exchange traded stocks and open-end mutual funds. Such instruments are generally
classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The types of instruments valued based on other observable inputs include bank commercial
deposits, corporate commercial paper and municipal obligations. Such instruments are generally
classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Note 16 Subsequent Event
On April 19, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per
common share, which is payable on June 1, 2010 to stockholders of record on May 10, 2010.
18
ITEM 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, as well as information contained in the risk factors described in Item 1A of this
report and elsewhere in this report, contains forward-looking statements, which are provided under
the safe harbor protection of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are generally written in the future tense and/or are preceded by words
such as will, may, should, could, expect, suggest, believe, anticipate, intend,
plan, or other similar words. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding
(1) our gross margins and factors that affect gross margins; (2) trends in our future sales;
(3) our research and development expenditures and efforts; (4) our capital expenditures; (5) our
provision for tax liabilities and other critical accounting estimates; and (6) our exposure to
market risks related to changes in interest rates, equity prices and foreign currency exchange
rates.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and
uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on information
that is currently available to us and expectations and assumptions that we deemed reasonable at the
time the statements were made. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements in this report or in any of our other communications, except as required by law. All
such forward-looking statements should be read as of the time the statements were made and with the
recognition that these forward-looking statements may not be complete or accurate at a later date.
Many factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
the forward-looking statements contained in this report. These factors include, but are not limited
to, those risks described in Part II Item 1A of this report and those risks described under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make
judgments and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes. Our management believes that we consistently apply these judgments and
estimates and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes fairly represent all
periods presented. However, any differences between these judgments and estimates and actual
results could have a material impact on our consolidated statements of income and financial
position. Critical accounting estimates, as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), are those that are most important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial condition
and results of operations and require our managements most difficult and subjective judgments and
estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates include those
regarding (1) revenue recognition, (2) valuation of inventories, and (3) income taxes. For a
discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Estimates in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
19
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sales Overview
We design, manufacture, and market high-performance, high-density programmable logic devices,
or PLDs; HardCopy® ASIC devices; pre-defined software design building blocks known as
intellectual property cores, or IP cores; and associated development tools.
Our net sales of $402.3 million for the three months ended April 2, 2010 increased by $137.7
million, or 52%, from our net sales of $264.6 million for the three months ended March 27, 2009.
The significant increase in net sales was broad-based, covering large and small customer
categories, and covering all geographies (excluding Japan). The increase was primarily due to
strong growth in sales of our New Products and Mainstream Products. We continue to see evidence of
a tipping point with respect to our opportunity to displace ASICs and ASSPs, as our newest
products are several process generations ahead of mainstream ASICs, and the resulting FPGA cost
advantage is accelerating ASIC replacement.
Sales by Product Category
We classify our products into three categories: New, Mainstream, and Mature and Other
Products. The composition of each product category is as follows:
|
|
|
New Products include the Stratix® III, Stratix IV (including E, GX and
GT), Arria® II GX, Cyclone® III, Cyclone IV GX, MAX®
II, and HardCopy III devices; |
|
|
|
Mainstream Products include the Stratix II (and GX), Arria GX, Cyclone II, and
HardCopy II devices; and |
|
|
|
Mature and Other Products include the Stratix (and GX), Cyclone, Classic, MAX
3000A, MAX 7000, MAX 7000A, MAX 7000B, MAX 7000S, MAX 9000, HardCopy, FLEX®
series, APEX series, Mercury, Excalibur, configuration and other devices,
intellectual property cores, and software and other tools. |
The product categories above have been constructed to approximate the relative life cycle
stages of our products. The product categories compositions are adjusted approximately every two
to three years. During the three months ended April 2, 2010, we adjusted product categories to move
certain products from New Products to Mainstream Products and certain products from Mainstream
Products to Mature and Other Products. All prior period data has been adjusted to conform to the
current classification. New Products are primarily comprised of our most advanced products.
Customers typically select these products for their latest generation of electronic systems. Demand
is generally driven by prototyping and production needs. Mainstream Products are somewhat older
products that are generally no longer design-win vehicles. Demand is driven by customers later
stage production-based needs. Mature Products are yet older products with demand generated by the
oldest customer systems still in production. This category also includes sales of software,
intellectual property, and other miscellaneous devices.
20
Net sales by product category were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Over-Year |
|
|
Sequential |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
216 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Mainstream |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Mature and Other |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by Vertical Market
The following vertical market data is derived from data that is provided to us by our
distributors and end customers. With a broad base of customers, who in some cases manufacture end
products spanning multiple market segments, the assignment of net sales to a vertical market
requires the use of estimates, judgment, and extrapolation. As such, actual results may differ from
those reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Over-Year |
|
|
Sequential |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom & Wireless |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Industrial Automation, Military & Auto |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Networking, Computer & Storage |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
-1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of FPGAs and CPLDs
Our PLDs consist of field-programmable gate arrays, or FPGAs, and complex programmable logic
devices, or CPLDs. FPGAs consist of our Stratix, Cyclone, Arria, APEX, FLEX, and ACEX series, as
well as our Excalibur and Mercury families. CPLDs consist of our MAX, MAX II, and Classic families.
Other Products consist of our HardCopy series and other masked programmed logic devices,
configuration devices, software and other tools and IP cores (collectively, Other Products).
21
Our net sales of FPGAs and CPLDs, and Other Products were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Over-Year |
|
|
Sequential |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FPGA |
|
|
79 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
78 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
CPLD |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Other Products |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales by Geography
During the first quarter of 2010, we introduced new geographic terms of Americas (previously
reported as North America), and EMEA (including Europe, the Middle East and Africa, previously
reported as Europe) to more closely align with the geographic regions we serve.
The following table is based on the geographic location of the original equipment
manufacturers or the distributors who purchased our products. The introduction of new geographic
terms had no impact on any prior period data, as previously reported. The geographic location of
distributors may be different from the geographic location of the ultimate end users.
Net sales by geography were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Over-Year |
|
|
Sequential |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
Asia Pacific |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
EMEA |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
Japan |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Concessions and Product Returns from Distributors
We sell the majority of our products to distributors worldwide at a list price. However,
distributors resell our products to end customers at a very broad range of individually negotiated
prices based on a variety of factors, including customer, product, quantity, geography and
competitive differentiation. The majority of our distributors sales to their customers are priced
at a discount from our list price. Under these circumstances, we remit back to the distributor a
portion of its original purchase price after the resale transaction is completed and we validate
the distributors resale information, including end customer, device, quantity and price, against
the distributor price concession that we have approved in advance. To receive price concessions,
distributors must submit the price concession claims to us for approval within 60 days of the
resale of the product to an end customer. Primarily because of the uncertainty related to the
final price, we defer revenue recognition on sales to distributors until our products are sold from
the distributor to the end customer, which is when our price is fixed or determinable.
Accordingly, these pricing uncertainties impact our results of operations, liquidity and capital
resources. Total price concessions earned by distributors were $1.4 billion and $0.7 billion for
the three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009, respectively. See Note 6 Deferred
Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors to our consolidated financial statements. Average
aggregate price concessions typically range from 65% to 80% of our list price on an annual basis,
depending upon the composition of our sales, volume and factors associated with timing of shipments
to distributors.
22
Our distributors have certain rights under our contracts to return defective, overstocked,
obsolete or discontinued products. Our stock rotation program generally allows distributors to
return unsold product to Altera, subject to certain contract limits, based on a percentage of sales
occurring over various periods prior to the stock rotation. Products resold by the distributor to
end customers are no longer eligible for return, unless specifically authorized by us. In addition,
we generally warrant our products against defects in material, workmanship and non-conformance to
our specifications. Returns from distributors totaled $18.9 million and $57.7 million for the three
months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009, respectively. See Note 6 Deferred Income and
Allowances on Sales to Distributors to our consolidated financial statements.
Gross Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin Percentage |
|
|
71.4 |
% |
|
|
64.5 |
% |
|
|
68.4 |
% |
Gross margin rates are heavily influenced by both vertical market mix and the timing of
material cost improvements. Our gross margin percentage for the three months ended April 2, 2010,
compared with the three months ended March 27, 2009 and December 31, 2009, increased by 6.9 points
and 3.0 points, respectively, primarily as a result of manufacturing cost reductions, specifically
due to improved yields on certain of our new products and increased efficiency in our processes. In
addition, our gross margin percentage for the three months ended April 2, 2010 was affected by a
substantial increase in revenue from our smaller, higher margin customer base, compared with the
same period in 2009. While these variables will continue to fluctuate on a quarterly basis, we
continue to target a 65% gross margin over the long term. We believe the 65% gross margin target
affords us the right mix of growth opportunities across all served markets.
Stock-based compensation expense included in Cost of sales during the three months ended April
2, 2010 and March 27, 2009 did not have a significant impact on our gross margin.
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense includes costs for compensation and benefits (including
stock-based compensation), development masks, prototype wafers, and depreciation and amortization.
These expenditures are for the design of new PLD and ASIC families, the development of process
technologies, new package technology, software to support new products and design environments, and
IP cores.
23
We will continue to make significant investments in the development of new products and focus
our efforts on the development of new programmable logic devices that use advanced semiconductor
wafer fabrication processes, as well as related development software. We are currently investing in
the development of future silicon products, as well as our Quartus ® II software, our
library of IP cores, and other future products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Over-Year |
|
|
Sequential |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and
Development Expense |
|
$ |
64.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
|
$ |
66.9 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Percentage of Net Sales |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expense for the three months ended April 2, 2010 increased by $6.1
million, or 11%, when compared with the three months ended March 27, 2009. The increase was
primarily due to a $6.9 million increase in variable compensation expense based on higher operating
results for the three months ended April 2, 2010 and the absence of a gain of $3.6 million from the
substantive termination of our retiree medical plan during the three months ended March 27, 2009,
partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in labor costs as a result of cost savings from our
restructuring activities initiated in 2009 and a $1.7 million decrease in spending on masks and
wafers.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
Selling, general, and administrative expense primarily includes compensation and benefits
(including stock-based compensation) related to sales, marketing, and administrative employees,
commissions and incentives, depreciation, legal, advertising, facilities, and travel expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Year- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Over-Year |
|
|
Sequential |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
Selling, General and
Administrative Expense |
|
$ |
62.1 |
|
|
$ |
60.7 |
|
|
$ |
63.4 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
-2 |
% |
Percentage of Net Sales |
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense for the three months ended April 2, 2010
increased by $1.4 million, or 2%, when compared with the three months ended March 27, 2009. The
increase was primarily due to a $3.9 million increase in variable compensation expense based on
higher operating results for the three months ended April 2, 2010 and the absence of a gain of $2.6
million from the substantive termination of our retiree medical plan during the three months ended
March 27, 2009, partially offset by a $2.7 million decrease in labor costs as a result of cost
savings from our restructuring activities initiated in 2009 and a $2.3 million decrease in
commission expenses and contract termination costs due to the termination of certain external sales
representatives during the three months ended March 27, 2009.
24
Deferred Compensation Plan
We allow our U.S.-based officers and director-level employees to defer a portion of their
compensation under the Altera Corporation Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (NQDC Plan).
Since the inception of the NQDC Plan, we have not made any contributions to the NQDC Plan and we
have no commitments to do so in the future. There are no NQDC Plan provisions that provide for any
guarantees or minimum return on investments. Investment income or loss earned by the NQDC Plan is
recorded as Loss (gain) on deferred compensation plan securities in our consolidated statements of
income. We reported net investment gains of $2.2 million on NQDC Plan assets for the three months
ended April 2, 2010. There was no significant gain or loss on NQDC Plan assets for the three months
ended March 27, 2009. These amounts resulted from the overall market performance of the underlying
securities. The investment loss (gain) also represents a decrease (increase) in the future payout
to employees and is recorded as Compensation expense (benefit) deferred compensation plan in our
consolidated statements of income. The compensation expense (benefit) associated with our deferred
compensation plan obligations is offset by losses (gains) from related securities. The net effect
of the investment income or loss and related
compensation expense or benefit has no impact on our income before income taxes, net income,
or cash balances. See Note 13 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan to our consolidated
financial statements for a detailed discussion of our NQDC Plan.
Interest Income and Other
Interest income and other decreased by $2.8 million for the three months ended April 2, 2010
when compared with the same period in 2009. Interest income and other consists mainly of interest
income generated from investments in high-quality fixed income securities. The decrease in Interest
income and other was primarily due to a decrease in interest income as a result of lower returns on
our money market funds.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the quarter ended April 2, 2010 remained relatively flat when compared
with the same periods in 2009, as a result of consistency in the amount of outstanding borrowings
and the comparability of interest rates in each period. See Note 9 Long-term Credit Facility to
our consolidated financial statements.
25
Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate reflects the impact of a significant amount of our earnings being taxed
in foreign jurisdictions at rates below the U.S. statutory tax rate. Our effective tax rate for the
three months ended April 2, 2010 was 4.3%, compared with 18.2% for the three months ended March 27,
2009. The significant net decrease in our effective tax rate in the quarter ended April 2, 2010 was
primarily due to the impact of certain discrete tax adjustments. We reversed $11.7 million of
liabilities for uncertain tax positions during the three month period ended April 2, 2010 as a
result of a court ruling issued on March 22, 2010 which held that stock-based compensation was not
required to be included in certain transfer pricing arrangements between a U.S. company and its
foreign subsidiary. In addition, we reversed $3.4 million of liabilities for uncertain tax
positions due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for
certain foreign jurisdictions. The decrease in our effective tax rate
in the quarter was also due to the impact of proportionately higher
earnings in foreign jurisdictions taxed at rates below the U.S.
statutory tax rate, partially offset by the increase in the effective
tax rate due to the expiration of the U.S. Federal Research and
Development Tax Credit. See Note 12 Income Taxes to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of
our effective tax rate.
As
of April 2, 2010, we had $235.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits. We are unable to
make a reasonably reliable estimate as to when cash settlements with the relevant taxing
authorities will occur.
Restructuring Charges
During the three months ended March 27, 2009, we announced a net reduction of approximately 33
positions which represented 1.2% of our workforce. We incurred restructuring-related charges of
approximately $5.2 million in the three months ended March 27, 2009. The charges were comprised of
employee severance costs of approximately $2.9 million and charges related to the termination of
certain external sales representatives of approximately $2.3 million. No significant restructuring
activities were initiated in the first quarter of 2010. We anticipate that the remaining
restructuring obligations of $0.7 million as of April 2, 2010 will be substantially paid prior to
December 31, 2010.
26
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We derive our liquidity and capital resources primarily from our cash flows from operations.
We have a $750 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the Facility), which has been used
primarily to fund common stock repurchases and to realign our capital structure. As of April 2,
2010, we had borrowed $500 million under the Facility. The remaining capacity of $250 million
available under the Facility also represents a source of liquidity. The terms of the Facility
require compliance with certain financial and non-financial covenants. Financial covenants require
us to maintain certain financial ratios related to interest coverage and financial leverage. As of
April 2, 2010, we were in compliance with all such covenants. See Note 9 Long-term Credit
Facility to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the Facility.
We use cash from operations and available amounts under the Facility for repurchases of our
common stock, cash dividends, and capital expenditures. Based on past performance and current
expectations, we believe our current available sources of funds including cash, cash equivalents,
and the Facility, plus anticipated cash generated from operations, will be adequate to finance our
operations, stock repurchases, cash dividends and capital expenditures for at least the next year.
Our cash and cash equivalents balance during the three months ended April 2, 2010 increased by
$0.2 billion. The change in cash and cash equivalents during the three months ended April 2, 2010
and March 27, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 2, |
|
|
March 27, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
132,670 |
|
|
$ |
43,984 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
(8,318 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
57,026 |
|
|
|
(18,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
191,703 |
|
|
$ |
17,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
For the three months ended April 2, 2010, our operating activities provided $132.7 million in
cash, primarily attributable to net income of $153.2 million, adjusted for non-cash stock-based
compensation expense of $15.3 million (net of related tax effects), depreciation and amortization
of $7.1 million, and deferred income tax expense of $0.9 million. The net decrease of $43.8
million in working capital accounts (excluding cash and cash equivalents) was primarily due to a
$142.0 million increase in Accounts receivable, net, a $17.6 million increase in Inventories, and a
$7.4 million decrease in Income tax payable, partially
offset by an $11.5 million increase in
Accounts payable and other liabilities and a $118.0 million increase in Deferred income and
allowances on sales to distributors.
27
Our sales to distributors are primarily made under agreements allowing for subsequent price
adjustments and returns, and we defer recognition of revenue until the products are resold by the
distributor. At the time of shipment to distributors, we (1) record a trade receivable at the list
selling price since there is a legally enforceable obligation from the
distributor to pay us currently for product delivered, (2) relieve inventory for the carrying
value of goods shipped since legal title has passed to the distributor, and (3) record deferred
revenue and deferred cost of sales in Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors in
the liability section of our consolidated balance sheets. Accordingly, increases in Accounts
receivable, net associated with higher billings are generally offset by corresponding increases in
Deferred income and allowances on sales to distributors. However, timing differences between gross
billings, advances to distributors, discounts earned, collections, revenue recognition and changes
in the mix of sales to OEMs and distributors may result in a temporary interruption to the normal
relationship between these two accounts.
The $142.0 million increase in Accounts receivable, net, principally related to increased
gross billings to distributors and OEMs associated with an upward trend in demand for our products
in March 2010 compared with December 2009. The $118.0 million increase in Deferred income and
allowances on sales to distributors was not as significant an increase as was experienced in
Accounts receivable, net, from the increased gross billings, due to the timing factors as discussed
above. As previously mentioned, gross billings were significantly higher in March 2010 than in
December 2009, but were outpaced by sell-through to end customers when comparing the same periods,
thus lessening the impact of the increase in gross billings on Deferred income and allowances on
sales to distributors. See Note 6 Deferred Income and Allowances on Sales to Distributors to our
consolidated financial statements.
The $17.6 million increase in Inventories was primarily attributable to our plan to get back
to a desired inventory level. The $11.5 million increase in Accounts payable and other liabilities
was primarily due to the increase in inventory purchase during the three months ended April 2,
2010. The $7.4 million decrease in Income tax payable was primarily due to the impact of a discrete
tax adjustment as a result of the court ruling issued on
March 22, 2010 which held that stock-based
compensation was not required to be included in certain transfer pricing arrangements between a
U.S. company and its foreign subsidiary. See Note 12 Income Taxes to our consolidated financial
statements.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities in the three months ended April 2, 2010 primarily consisted
of net sales of deferred compensation plan securities of $3.5 million and purchases of property and
equipment of $1.5 million.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities in the three months ended April 2, 2010 primarily
consisted of proceeds of $77.5 million from the issuance of common stock to employees through our
employee stock plans, partially offset by cash dividend payments of $14.9 million, principal
payments on capital lease obligations of $2.6 million and minimum statutory withholding for vested
restricted stock units of $4.8 million. Our dividend policy could be impacted in the future by,
among other items, future changes in our cash flows from operations and our capital spending needs
such as those relating to research and development, investments and acquisitions, common stock
repurchases, and other strategic investments.
28
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We depend entirely upon subcontractors to manufacture our silicon wafers and provide assembly
and test services. Due to lengthy subcontractor lead times, we must order these materials and
services from these subcontractors well in advance, and we are obligated to pay for the materials
and services once they are completed. As of April 2, 2010, we had approximately $180.0 million of
outstanding purchase commitments to such subcontractors. We expect to receive and pay for these
materials and services over the next six months.
We also lease facilities under non-cancelable lease agreements expiring at various times
through 2015. There have been no significant changes to our operating lease obligations since
December 31, 2009. The balance of our capital lease obligations included in our consolidated
balance sheets was $0.2 million as of April 2, 2010 and $2.9 million as of December 31, 2009.
In addition to these lease and purchase obligations, in the normal course of business, we
enter into a variety of agreements and financial commitments. It is not possible to predict the
maximum potential amount of future payments under these agreements due to the conditional nature of
our obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.
Historically, payments pursuant to such agreements have not been material. We believe that any
future payments required pursuant to such agreements would not be significant to our consolidated
financial position or operating results.
As
of April 2, 2010, we had $235.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits. Due to the
uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with our unrecognized tax
benefits as of April 2, 2010, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate as to when cash
settlements with the relevant taxing authorities will occur.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As of April 2, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item
303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
IMPACT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY AND INFLATION
We have international operations and incur expenditures in currencies other than U.S. dollars.
For non-U.S. subsidiaries and branches, foreign currency transaction gains and losses and the
impact of the remeasurement of local currency assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars for the
three months ended April 2, 2010 and March 27, 2009 was not significant. We do not enter into
foreign exchange transactions for trading or speculative purposes.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On April 19, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per
common share, which is payable on June 1, 2010 to stockholders of record on May 10, 2010.
29
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Accounting Standards Adopted in the Three Months Ended April 2, 2010
Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance on
fair value measurements and disclosures. The new guidance requires additional disclosures regarding
fair value measurements, amends disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets, and provides
clarification regarding the level of disaggregation of fair value disclosures by investment class.
This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2009, except for certain Level 3 activity disclosure requirements that will be effective for
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Accordingly, we adopted this amendment in the
quarter ended April 2, 2010, except for the additional Level 3 requirements which will be adopted
in 2011. See Note 15 Fair Value of Financial Instruments to our consolidated financial
statements.
Subsequent Events
In February 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance on subsequent events. Under this amended
guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events
have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was
effective immediately and we adopted this new guidance in the quarter ended April 2, 2010. See
Note 16 Subsequent Event to our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
While we are exposed to interest rate fluctuations in many of the worlds leading
industrialized countries, our interest income and expense is most sensitive to fluctuations in the
general level of U.S. interest rates. Our investment strategy is focused on preservation of capital
and supporting our liquidity requirements. Our exposure to market risk as a result of changes in
interest rates relates primarily to our cash and cash equivalents, certain interest-rate sensitive
assets held under the NQDC Plan and our long-term credit facility. Our NQDC Plan assets include
holdings of various issuers, types and maturity dates.
The market value of these investments on any given day during the investment term may vary as
a result of market interest rate fluctuations. A hypothetical 10% movement in interest rates during
the investment term would not likely have a material impact on the fair value of the portfolio. The
actual impact on the fair value of the portfolio in the future may differ materially from this
analysis, depending on actual balances and changes in the timing and the amount of interest rate
movements.
Our consolidated operating results are affected by, among other factors, interest income on
our cash equivalents. If the interest rate declines, our consolidated operating results may be
negatively impacted.
In addition to our cash flows from operations, we derive our liquidity from our long-term
credit facility (the Facility). Our total borrowings under the Facility as of April 2, 2010 were
$500 million. Borrowings under this Facility bear a variable interest rate at either a Eurodollar
rate (LIBOR) or a Prime rate, at our option, plus an applicable margin based upon certain
financial ratios, determined and payable quarterly. The interest rate as of April 2, 2010 was LIBOR
plus 0.425%. In addition, we pay a facility fee on the entire Facility. This facility fee varies
with certain financial ratios and was 0.125% as of April 2, 2010.
30
Our consolidated operating results and cash flows are exposed to changes in interest rates
that could adversely affect the amount of interest expense incurred and paid on the Facility in any
given period. Due to the variable interest rate on the Facility, the fair value of the Facility
would not likely be materially affected by any future changes in interest rates.
Equity Price Risk
We are exposed to equity price risk inherent in the marketable equity securities held in our
NQDC Plan. A hypothetical 10% adverse change in the stock prices of these equity securities would
not result in a material impact on our consolidated financial position, operating results or cash
flows.
Foreign Currency Risk
We have international operations and incur expenditures in currencies other than U.S. dollars.
To date, our exposure to exchange rate volatility, resulting from foreign currency transaction
gains and losses and remeasurement of local currency assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars, has
been insignificant. If foreign currency rates were to fluctuate by 10% from rates in effect at
April 2, 2010, the resulting transaction gains or losses and the effects of remeasurement would not
materially affect our consolidated financial position, operating results or cash flows.
ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Evaluation Date).
The purpose of this evaluation was to determine if, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure
controls and procedures were designed and operating effectively to provide reasonable assurance
that the information relating to Altera, required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act filings
(i) was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules
and forms, and (ii) was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at
a reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a
- 15(f) and 15(d) 15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
31
Limitation on Effectiveness of Controls
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. The
design of any control system is based, in part, upon the benefits of the control system relative to
its costs. Control systems can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion
of two or more people, or by management override of the control. In addition, over time, controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the
policies and procedures may deteriorate. In addition, the design of any control system is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: Legal Proceedings
This information is included in Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies to our consolidated
financial statements in Item 1 and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A: Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously described under Item 1A
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. For additional information
regarding risk factors, please refer to the description of the risk factors associated with our
business previously disclosed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Before you decide to buy, hold, or sell our common stock, you should carefully consider the
risks described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
and the other information contained elsewhere in this report. These risks are not the only risks
facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. Our business, consolidated operating
results and financial position could be seriously harmed if any of the events underlying any of
these risks or uncertainties actually occurs. In that event, the market price for our common stock
could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
ITEM 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Items 2(a) and 2(b) are inapplicable.
2(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
32
Except for the shares tendered by employees to satisfy minimum statutory withholding
requirements on employee stock award transactions, we did not repurchase any of our common stock during the three months ended April 2,
2010. Since the inception of our stock
repurchase program in 1996 through April 2, 2010, our board of directors has authorized
183.0 million shares for repurchase and we have repurchased a total of 178.3 million shares of our
common stock for an aggregate cost of $3.7 billion. All shares were retired upon acquisition. As of
April 2, 2010, 4.7 million shares remained authorized for repurchase under our stock repurchase
program. No existing repurchase plans or programs expired, nor have we decided to terminate any
repurchase plans or programs prior to expiration. There are no existing plans or programs under
which we intend to make further purchases.
ITEM 6: Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
#31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
#31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
#32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
#32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
#101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
#101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
#101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
#101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
#101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
#101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALTERA CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ RONALD J. PASEK
|
|
|
|
Ronald J. Pasek |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
34
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
#31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
#31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
#32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
#32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
#101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document. |
|
|
|
#101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|
|
|
#101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
#101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
#101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|
|
|
#101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
35