International Game Technology
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-10684
International Game Technology
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
88-0173041
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9295 Prototype Drive
Reno, Nevada 89521
(Address of principal executive offices)
(775) 448-7777
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
www.IGT.com
(Registrants website)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule
12b-2): Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
|
|
|
Class
|
|
Outstanding at August 3, 2006 |
|
|
|
Common Stock
par value $.00015625 per share
|
|
339,408,216 |
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
Abbreviation or acronym |
|
Meaning as used in this report |
Acres
|
|
Acres Gaming Incorporated |
Anchor
|
|
Anchor Gaming |
APB
|
|
Accounting Principles Board |
APIC
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
ARB
|
|
Accounting Research Bulletin |
ARDU
|
|
average revenue per day per unit |
ARPU
|
|
average revenue per unit |
ARS
|
|
Auction Rate Securities |
ASP
|
|
average sales price per machine |
CAD$
|
|
Canadian dollars |
CCSC
|
|
Colorado Central Station Casino |
CDS
|
|
central determination system |
CEO
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
CFO
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Debentures
|
|
Senior Convertible Debentures due January 29, 2033 |
EBITDA
|
|
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization |
EITF
|
|
Emerging Issues Task Force |
EPA
|
|
Environmental Protection Agency |
EPS
|
|
earnings per share |
ERP
|
|
enterprise resource planning |
ESPP
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
FAS
|
|
Financial Accounting Standard |
FASB
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FIN
|
|
FASB Interpretations |
FSP
|
|
FASB Staff Position |
MLP
|
|
multi-level progressive |
NDT
|
|
The Nevada Department of Taxation |
OSHA
|
|
Occupational Safety & Health Administration |
PGIC
|
|
Progressive Gaming International Corporation |
pp
|
|
percentage points |
R&D
|
|
research and development |
RFID
|
|
radio frequency identification |
SAB
|
|
Staff Accounting Bulletin |
SEC
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
SFAS
|
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SIP
|
|
Stock Incentive Plan |
SMI
|
|
Shuffle Master, Inc. |
SG&A
|
|
selling, general and administrative |
TRO
|
|
temporary restraining order |
UK
|
|
United Kingdom |
US
|
|
United States |
VIE
|
|
variable interest entity |
WW or WagerWorks
|
|
WagerWorks, Inc. |
WAP
|
|
wide area progressive |
*
|
|
not meaningful (in tables) |
IGT, we, our, management, Company
|
|
International Game Technology, consolidated |
ii
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
297.6 |
|
|
$ |
274.5 |
|
|
$ |
955.3 |
|
|
$ |
880.9 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
314.8 |
|
|
|
305.1 |
|
|
|
917.7 |
|
|
|
890.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
612.4 |
|
|
|
579.6 |
|
|
|
1,873.0 |
|
|
|
1,771.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product sales |
|
|
148.7 |
|
|
|
130.8 |
|
|
|
473.7 |
|
|
|
445.7 |
|
Cost of gaming operations |
|
|
131.2 |
|
|
|
140.6 |
|
|
|
384.7 |
|
|
|
431.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
270.2 |
|
|
|
236.5 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
103.8 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
Bad debt provisions |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and operating expenses |
|
|
440.8 |
|
|
|
412.2 |
|
|
|
1,323.0 |
|
|
|
1,268.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
171.6 |
|
|
|
167.4 |
|
|
|
550.0 |
|
|
|
503.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
(43.2 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before tax |
|
|
174.6 |
|
|
|
180.0 |
|
|
|
561.1 |
|
|
|
517.4 |
|
Income tax provisions |
|
|
60.5 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
202.3 |
|
|
|
186.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
|
$ |
331.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.125 |
|
|
$ |
0.120 |
|
|
$ |
0.375 |
|
|
$ |
0.360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
338.0 |
|
|
|
343.5 |
|
|
|
337.0 |
|
|
|
344.8 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
369.3 |
|
|
|
356.8 |
|
|
|
371.9 |
|
See accompanying notes.
1
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions, except par value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
356.3 |
|
|
$ |
288.9 |
|
Investment securities, at market value |
|
|
124.8 |
|
|
|
268.3 |
|
Restricted cash and investments |
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
130.9 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for
doubtful accounts of $20.2 and $20.4 |
|
|
360.4 |
|
|
|
327.8 |
|
Current maturities of notes and contracts receivable, net |
|
|
88.4 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
162.2 |
|
|
|
142.3 |
|
Jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
194.0 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,487.2 |
|
|
|
1,437.2 |
|
Notes and contracts receivable, net |
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
427.7 |
|
|
|
385.2 |
|
Jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
343.1 |
|
|
|
469.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
262.5 |
|
|
|
286.3 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
1,095.5 |
|
|
|
1,090.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
194.4 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,946.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,864.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of notes payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
611.0 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
96.7 |
|
Jackpot liabilities |
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
203.9 |
|
Accrued employee benefit plan liabilities |
|
|
54.6 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
166.5 |
|
|
|
188.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
536.5 |
|
|
|
1,217.6 |
|
Notes payable, net of current maturities |
|
|
810.3 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
Non-current jackpot liabilities |
|
|
376.4 |
|
|
|
501.9 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,756.8 |
|
|
|
1,958.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $.00015625 par value; 1,280.0 shares authorized;
719.5 and 712.8 shares issued |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,835.2 |
|
|
|
1,623.6 |
|
Treasury stock at cost: 380.0 and 374.6 shares |
|
|
(2,353.0 |
) |
|
|
(2,176.9 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,703.5 |
|
|
|
2,471.1 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,189.4 |
|
|
|
1,905.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,946.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,864.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
|
$ |
331.1 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and asset charges |
|
|
174.1 |
|
|
|
150.3 |
|
Debt discounts and deferred offering costs |
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Bad debt provisions |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Inventory obsolescence provisions |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding
acquisitions and VIE consolidations/deconsolidations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(33.6 |
) |
|
|
28.3 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(28.6 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
Jackpot liabilities |
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
(30.1 |
) |
Income taxes, net of employee stock plans |
|
|
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
47.2 |
|
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans |
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from operations |
|
|
382.5 |
|
|
|
562.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(216.7 |
) |
|
|
(166.2 |
) |
Investment securities, net |
|
|
141.2 |
|
|
|
(187.0 |
) |
Jackpot annuity investments, net |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Loans receivable cash advanced |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Loans receivable payments received |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
Proceeds from assets sold |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(56.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from investing |
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(288.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt (repayments) proceeds, net |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
Employee stock plan proceeds |
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
Excess tax benefits from employee stock plans |
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(126.5 |
) |
|
|
(124.6 |
) |
Share repurchases |
|
|
(176.1 |
) |
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
Structured share repurchase plans, net |
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash from financing |
|
|
(228.2 |
) |
|
|
(275.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange rates effect on cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and equivalents |
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning cash and equivalents |
|
|
288.9 |
|
|
|
307.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
356.3 |
|
|
$ |
302.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
Supplemental Cash Flows Information
Depreciation, amortization and asset charges reflected in the cash flows statements are
comprised of amounts presented separately on the income statements, plus depreciation and asset
charges included in cost of product sales and cost of gaming operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
$ |
(402.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(572.9 |
) |
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
543.4 |
|
|
|
385.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
$ |
141.2 |
|
|
$ |
(187.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot funding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collections to fund jackpots |
|
$ |
104.2 |
|
|
$ |
187.2 |
|
Payments to winners |
|
|
(148.2 |
) |
|
|
(217.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in jackpot liabilities |
|
|
(44.0 |
) |
|
|
(30.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jackpot annuity purchases |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
Jackpot annuity proceeds |
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in jackpot annuity investments |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net jackpot funding cash flows |
|
$ |
(24.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
(48.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(34.8 |
) |
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
(153.2 |
) |
|
|
(113.2 |
) |
Intellectual property |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
(216.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(166.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
219.2 |
|
|
|
145.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in capital expenditure accruals |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
Accrued other current asset for
structured share repurchase settlement |
|
|
101.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIE deconsolidations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets |
|
$ |
139.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value of liabilities |
|
|
139.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation
Our fiscal accounting periods end on the Saturday nearest the last day of the quarter end month.
For simplicity, we present all fiscal period endings as the calendar month end date. Accordingly,
this report presents the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period End |
|
|
Actual |
|
Presented as |
Current quarter |
|
July 1, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
Prior year quarter |
|
July 2, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
Prior fiscal year end |
|
October 1, 2005 |
|
September 30, 2005 |
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with SEC requirements and include
all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are necessary to fairly present consolidated
results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for all periods presented. Interim
period results are not necessarily indicative of full year results This quarterly report should be
read in conjunction with our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of International Game Technology and all
majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries and variable interest entities for which we are the
primary beneficiary. All appropriate inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated. We
use the equity method to account for investments in unconsolidated affiliates when we exercise
significant influence, but do not control the affiliate and when we are not the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity.
Unconsolidated Affiliate
In February 2006, IGT paid $56.0 million for a 10% equity interest in Casino IP Holdings, LLC
(LLC), a variable interest entity formed to hold, develop, and license Walker Digitals
intellectual property identified for gambling use. IGT agreed to cooperatively develop and market
products, expected to be integral to our operations, using certain LLC innovations. We are not the
primary beneficiary of the LLC and apply the equity method of accounting. Our maximum exposure to
loss at June 30, 2006, is our net investment in the LLC of $54.0 million, included in other
non-current assets. Our portion of the LLC losses for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 totaling
$2.0 million is not material and is presented as a component of SG&A expense.
WAP Trust VIE Consolidations
We have consolidated our WAP trusts in Iowa and New Jersey since March 31, 2004, under FIN 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. Consolidated trust assets
equal liabilities and relate primarily to jackpot funding.
On November 4, 2005, because of an earlier change in gaming regulations, IGT assumed direct
responsibility for New Jersey WAP jackpot system operations previously under the control of a
separate trust administrator, including casino collections and future winner payments. The
administration of past winner payments remains the responsibility of the existing separate New
Jersey trusts, and IGT has no remaining obligations related to past winner payments. Accordingly,
we deconsolidated approximately $139.2 million of New Jersey VIE assets and liabilities related to
past winners during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. This deconsolidation had no material impact
on consolidated gaming operations revenues or expenses.
We continue to consolidate the Iowa Trust VIE, with assets and liabilities totaling $4.0 million at
June 30, 2006. IGT, as trustee and administrator, will establish and consolidate any future New
Jersey WAP trusts required only for periodic payments to winners who decline lump sum payout.
Hurricane Damages
We suffered damages and losses to our US gulf coast operations from the hurricanes in August and
September 2005, primarily affecting gaming operations machines destroyed or temporarily shutdown.
At June 30, 2006, approximately 500 gaming operations machines remain offline at damaged casinos.
No determination has been made as to the total amount or timing of insurance recoveries. We carry
comprehensive business interruption and property damage insurance. Negotiations with our insurance
carriers are ongoing, and we continue to work closely with consultants to ascertain the full amount
of insurance proceeds due to IGT because of the damages and losses suffered in the hurricanes. We
will record any business interruption
5
insurance recoveries for lost earnings and any property insurance reimbursements over book value
when realized and all contingencies are resolved. This may result in periodic fluctuations
affecting comparability.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
FIN 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes the recognition threshold and measurement criteria
for determining the tax benefit amounts to recognize in financial statements. This interpretation
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, which will be IGTs fiscal year
2008. At this time, we have not determined the impact of adopting this interpretation on our
financial statements.
SFAS 156
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assetsan amendment
of FASB Statement No. 140, amending various accounting guidance for servicing assets and
liabilities. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006,
which will be IGTs fiscal year 2007. We do not anticipate a significant impact on our results of
operations, financial position or cash flows from the adoption of this statement.
SFAS 155
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instrumentsan
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140, allowing companies to elect fair value measurement
for instruments in their entirety in cases otherwise requiring a derivative to be bifurcated. This
statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued in fiscal years beginning
after September 15, 2006, which will be IGTs fiscal year 2007. We do not expect the adoption of
this statement to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
SFAS 154
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, requiring
retrospective application to prior-period financial statements of changes in accounting principle,
unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect
of the change. SFAS 154 also redefines restatement as the revising of previously issued
financial statements to reflect the correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005, which will be IGTs fiscal year 2007. Although we have no current application
for this statement, the adoption of this statement may affect our future results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
FIN 47
In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an
Interpretation of FAS 143. FIN 47 requires recognition of a liability for the fair value of a
conditional asset retirement obligation if we can reasonably estimate the fair value of the
liability. When sufficient information exists, we should factor uncertainty about the amount
and/or timing of future settlement into the liability measurement. The interpretation is effective
for the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005, which is IGTs fiscal year 2006. There
was no material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows from the
adoption of FIN 47.
SFAS 123R (including FSPs) and SAB 107
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, replacing and
superseding both SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and APB 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123R requires fair value measurement and recognition in the
financial statements for all share-based compensation arrangements. SFAS 123R also requires
additional accounting and disclosures related to income tax effects and cash flows resulting from
share-based compensation arrangements.
In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB 107, Share-Based Payment, providing interpretive guidance on SFAS
123R valuation methods, assumptions used in valuation models, and the interaction of SFAS 123R with
existing SEC guidance. The additional SAB 107 requirement for the classification of stock
compensation expense to the same financial statement line as cash compensation affected our cost of
product sales and gaming operations, related gross profits and margins, R&D, and SG&A expenses.
SFAS 123R is effective for the first annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. We
adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 in our first quarter of fiscal 2006. See Note 2
for additional information.
6
SFAS 151
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 151, Inventory Costs, amending ARB 43 Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing. SFAS 151 clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight
and handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). SFAS 151 introduces the concept of normal
capacity requiring allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based upon normal
capacity of production facilities. We must expense unallocated overhead costs in the period
incurred. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2005, which is IGTs fiscal year 2006. The adoption of this statement had no
material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
2. Share-based Compensation
Our share-based payment arrangements are designed to attract and retain employees. The
amount, frequency, and terms of share-based awards may vary based on competitive practices,
company operating results, and government regulations. New IGT shares are issued upon option
exercise or restricted share grants. IGTs restricted share awards (referred to in SFAS 123R
as non-vested share awards), are earned over the employees service (vesting) period, and hold
no further restrictions upon vesting.
Stock Incentive Plan
Under the IGT SIP, our eligible employees and non-employee directors may be granted non-qualified
and incentive stock options, restricted shares or stock appreciation rights. SIP grants may
vest over time of service or based on performance. We generally grant stock options at an exercise
price equal to the market price at the date of grant, with a 10-year contractual term. Our
share-based compensation arrangements typically vest ratably over five years of continuous service.
At June 30, 2006, 14.6 million shares remain available for grant under the IGT SIP. Each
restricted share granted counts as four shares against this allowance.
Current year stock options activity as of and for the nine months ended June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Instrinsic |
Options |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Value |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
(per share) |
|
(years) |
|
(millions) |
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
22,774 |
|
|
$ |
22.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
30.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(5,461 |
) |
|
|
13.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
29.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
21.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
18,307 |
|
|
$ |
26.05 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
220.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of period |
|
|
7,867 |
|
|
$ |
21.87 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
127.9 |
|
|
|
|
Current year restricted shares activity as of and for the nine months ended June 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
Date |
|
Vesting |
|
Instrinsic |
Restricted Shares |
|
Shares |
|
Fair Value |
|
Period |
|
Value |
|
|
(thousands) |
|
(per share) |
|
(years) |
|
(millions) |
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
514 |
|
|
$ |
26.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
34.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
27.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
34.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
$ |
32.40 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
52.8 |
|
|
|
|
7
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the IGT qualified ESPP, eligible employees are granted an option with a 12-month term to
purchase a limited number of shares, exercisable the last day in February each year. Eligible
employees may participate in this plan through payroll deductions up to certain limits. The
option price is currently equal to 85% of the market price of our stock on the grant date or
exercise date, whichever is less. Approximately 248,000 shares were issued in February 2006 under
this plan. Based on expected payroll contributions as of June 30, 2006, we expect to issue
approximately 242,000 shares in February 2007 under this plan. At June 30, 2006, 3.0 million
shares were available for future grants.
Additionally, eligible UK employees may enroll annually in the Barcrest Savings Related Share
Option Scheme established in January 1999. Employees must elect to vest over three, five, or
seven years and the option price is equal to 80% of the market price of our stock on the grant
date. Approximately 35,000 shares were issued during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 under
this plan and approximately 798,000 shares were available for grant at June 30, 2006. Based on
enrollment through June 2006, we expect to issue approximately 84,000 shares under this plan over
the next seven years.
Expense Measurement and Recognition
On October 1, 2005, IGT adopted the provisions of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 requiring the measurement
and recognition of all share-based compensation under the fair value method. We implemented SFAS
123R using the modified prospective transition method and adjusted previously recorded deferred
compensation back to additional paid-in capital. We continue to evaluate the provisions of SFAS
123R-3, Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards,
and have not yet elected the alternative method for establishing and accounting for the APIC pool.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2006, we recognized compensation expense for all current award
grants and for the unvested portion of previous award grants based on grant date fair values.
Prior to fiscal 2006, we accounted for share-based awards under the APB 25 intrinsic value method,
which resulted in compensation expense recorded only for restricted share awards and the
modification or acquisition of outstanding unvested options. Prior period financial statements
have not been adjusted to reflect fair value share-based compensation under SFAS 123R.
With the adoption of SFAS 123R, we changed our method of expense attribution for fair value
share-based compensation from the accelerated approach to the straight-line approach for future
service based awards granted. We anticipate the straight-line method will provide a more
meaningful measure of costs incurred. Compensation for share-based awards granted prior to the
beginning of fiscal 2006 will continue to be recognized under the accelerated method.
Unrecognized costs related to all share-based awards outstanding at June 30, 2006 totaled $75.9
million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years.
We use historical data and projections to estimate expected employee behaviors related to option
exercises and forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires that forfeitures be included as part of the grant
date estimate. The cumulative effect of forfeitures related to previous SFAS 123 pro forma
expense was not material. Prior to adopting SFAS 123R, we reduced stock-based compensation
expense when forfeitures occurred.
The fair value of restricted share awards is based on the grant date market price of IGT
stock. We estimate the fair value of each stock option award on the grant date using the
Black-Scholes valuation model incorporating the assumptions noted in the following table. Option
valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, and changes in assumptions
used can materially affect the fair value estimate. Expected volatility and dividends are based
on implied and historical IGT stock factors. Expected term represents the estimated weighted
average time between grant and employee exercise. Risk free rate is based on US Treasury rates
appropriate for the expected term.
Option Valuation Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
Expected dividends |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
1.71 |
% |
|
|
1.56 |
% |
|
|
1.55 |
% |
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Risk free rate |
|
|
4.93 |
% |
|
|
3.79 |
% |
|
|
4.45 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
8
Reported Share-based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax |
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
25.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
Tax benefit |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-tax |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
18.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income Comparison
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income |
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
|
$ |
331.1 |
|
Incremental after-tax pro forma share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparative net income (prior year pro forma) |
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
|
$ |
112.4 |
|
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
|
$ |
315.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS as reported |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
Basic EPS (prior year pro forma) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS as reported |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
Diluted EPS (prior year pro forma) |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
Other Share-based Compensation Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
(In millions except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair value per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
$ |
8.98 |
|
|
$ |
7.21 |
|
|
$ |
7.53 |
|
|
$ |
8.01 |
|
Restricted shares granted |
|
$ |
35.80 |
|
|
$ |
25.70 |
|
|
$ |
34.77 |
|
|
$ |
35.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
$ |
119.8 |
|
|
$ |
70.9 |
|
Total fair value of restricted shares vested |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received for options exercised |
|
$ |
25.8 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
Tax benefit realized for tax return deductions |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
84.6 |
|
|
$ |
69.8 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
67.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
162.2 |
|
|
$ |
142.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
568.3 |
|
|
|
483.2 |
|
Manufacturing machinery and equipment |
|
|
219.4 |
|
|
|
220.1 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Construction in process |
|
|
59.9 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
986.3 |
|
|
|
876.2 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(558.6 |
) |
|
|
(491.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
427.7 |
|
|
$ |
385.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas facilities under construction totaled $41.8 million at June 30, 2006 and $25.1
million at September 30, 2005. During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, we listed our facilities
in Rapid City, South Dakota for sale and reclassified them to other assets held for sale. The net
book value of assets held for sale was $6.4 million as of June 30, 2006.
On August 25, 2005, we completed the acquisition of WagerWorks, a provider of internet
gaming technology, content and services. We anticipate this business combination will facilitate
the distribution of our game content across remote channels and mediums, including the internet
and interactive television. Pro forma financial information is not provided, as this acquisition
is not material to our consolidated results.
As the business valuation is not yet complete, the purchase price allocation is preliminary. As of
June 30, 2006, we allocated the aggregate purchase price of $89.1 million to:
|
ª |
|
tangible assets of $5.7 million, including $1.4 million in cash |
|
|
ª |
|
total liabilities of $8.1 million |
|
|
ª |
|
identifiable intangibles of $31.1 million, including $10.1 million in patents, $7.0
million in contracts, and $14.0 million in developed technology |
|
|
ª |
|
$1.8 million of in-process R&D with no future alternative use, charged to R&D expense |
|
|
ª |
|
$58.6 million in goodwill not deductible for tax purposes |
10
6. |
|
Allowances for Doubtful Notes and Contracts Receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
23.2 |
|
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
Long-term |
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
$ |
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
Concentrations of Credit Risk |
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist
principally of cash or equivalents, short-term investments, and receivables. We place short-term
investments in high credit quality financial institutions or in short duration high quality
securities. With the exception of US Government and Agency securities, our investment policy
limits the amount of credit exposure in any one financial institution, industry group or type of
investment. Cash on deposit may be in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits.
Our revenues and resulting receivables are concentrated in specific legalized gaming regions. Our
accounts, contracts, and notes receivable at June 30, 2006 were comprised of the following
jurisdictions:
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada |
|
|
25 |
% |
California |
|
|
9 |
|
Mississippi |
|
|
9 |
|
Other (5% or less individually) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
13 |
% |
Other (5% or less individually) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total International |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
11
8. |
|
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
Intangible Additions
Patent additions in the following table include capitalized legal costs. See Note 5 for additional
information regarding acquisitions and valuation adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Life |
|
Nine months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
Valuation Adjustments |
|
|
Other Additions |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
(In millions, except life) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite lived intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Contracts |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Balances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite lived intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents |
|
$ |
327.6 |
|
|
$ |
112.5 |
|
|
$ |
215.1 |
|
|
$ |
323.3 |
|
|
$ |
92.7 |
|
|
$ |
230.6 |
|
Contracts |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Trademarks |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Developed technology |
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
403.3 |
|
|
$ |
140.8 |
|
|
$ |
262.5 |
|
|
$ |
402.1 |
|
|
$ |
115.8 |
|
|
$ |
286.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Amortization
Our aggregate amortization expense totaled $11.3 million in the current quarter versus $9.5 million
in the prior year quarter and $33.7 million in the nine months ended June 30, 2006 versus $27.9
million for the same prior year period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated annual amortization |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
$ |
42.2 |
|
|
$ |
38.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.2 |
|
|
$ |
31.7 |
|
Goodwill Activity by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended June 30, 2006 |
|
North America |
|
|
International |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
994.3 |
|
|
$ |
96.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,090.9 |
|
Business acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
WagerWorks purchase price adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Tax benefit of Anchor options exercised |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
992.4 |
|
|
$ |
103.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,095.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with EITF 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under
APB 25 and FIN 44, goodwill was adjusted for the tax benefit of Anchor options exercised subsequent
to acquisition.
12
9. |
|
Credit Facilities & Indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Outstanding Balance |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility |
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
|
$ |
200.0 |
|
Foreign credit facilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Senior convertible debentures, net of unamortized discount |
|
|
610.3 |
|
|
|
602.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable, net |
|
$ |
810.3 |
|
|
$ |
811.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to be in compliance with all applicable debt covenants at June 30, 2006.
Senior Credit Facility
On December 20, 2005, we entered into an amended and restated unsecured $2.5 billion credit
facility with a syndicate of banks, replacing the previous credit facility of $1.5 billion. The
new five-year credit facility provides a $2.5 billion revolving line of credit, of which up to
$100.0 million is available for letters of credit and up to $50.0 million is available for
swingline (same day funds) borrowing. Borrowings outstanding totaled $200.0 million at June 30,
2006 and $4.2 million was reserved for letters of credit.
Interest rates and facility fees applicable to the credit facility are based on our public credit
ratings and/or debt to capitalization ratio. At issuance, the interest rate was LIBOR plus 37.5
bps with a facility fee of 12.5 bps. The revolver interest rate was 5.82375% at June 30, 2006.
Financial covenants (as defined in the new facility agreement) include a minimum ratio of EBITDA to
interest expense minus interest on jackpot liabilities and a maximum ratio of Debt to EBITDA.
Absence of compliance with required covenants causes an event of default that, if not cured, could
cause the entire outstanding borrowings under the credit facility to become immediately due and
payable.
The new credit facility agreement also includes certain restrictions on our ability to:
|
ª |
|
incur additional debt, guarantee debt, or enter into swap agreements |
|
|
ª |
|
incur liens |
|
|
ª |
|
enter into business combinations, liquidate, or dissolve |
|
|
ª |
|
sell, transfer, lease or dispose of substantially all assets |
|
|
ª |
|
change the nature of the business |
Foreign Credit Facilities
Our available foreign credit facilities totaled $77.0 million at June 30, 2006. Renewals occur
annually in January and July.
Senior Convertible Debentures
On April 4, 2006, IGT entered into a new indenture as a result of exchanging our old Debentures for
an equal aggregate principal amount at maturity of new Debentures and an exchange fee of $2.51 per
Debenture. In the aggregate, $964.8 million, or 99.5%, of the old Debentures principal amount at
maturity were tendered and accepted for exchange. The terms of the new Debentures are
substantially similar to the old Debentures, except that the new Debentures include a net share
settlement feature requiring us to satisfy our conversion obligation to holders in cash, per the
terms of the indenture up to the accreted principal amount and in common shares for any remaining
conversion value.
Except for the exchange fee, there is no impact on interest expense as a result of the exchange.
This exchange reduced share dilution associated with the Debentures by enabling us to apply the
treasury stock method rather than the if-converted method for calculating diluted EPS related to
contingently issuable shares.
Because the market price condition for convertibility was satisfied for the conversion period
July 18, 2006 through October 13, 2006, the Debentures will be classified in current
liabilities for our fourth quarter. Holders have the right to require IGT to redeem the
Debentures for an amount equal to accreted value plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if any,
on January 29, 2008, 2013, 2018, 2023 and 2028. IGT may call the Debentures for redemption in
cash equal to accreted value plus accrued and unpaid cash interest, if
any. If IGT calls the Debentures, holders will be notified at least 15 days, but not more than
60 days, prior to the redemption date and will have the right to convert prior to redemption.
13
10. Earnings Per Share
The calculation of diluted EPS from continuing operations below reflects our outstanding old
Debenture shares for all periods presented, in accordance with the adoption of EITF 04-8, The
Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share, in our first quarter of
fiscal 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
|
$ |
331.1 |
|
After-tax interest expense on convertible debentures |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Numerator |
|
$ |
114.2 |
|
|
$ |
117.1 |
|
|
$ |
363.1 |
|
|
$ |
338.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
338.0 |
|
|
|
343.5 |
|
|
|
337.0 |
|
|
|
344.8 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Dilutive effect of debentures |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS Denominator |
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
369.3 |
|
|
|
356.8 |
|
|
|
371.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average antidilutive stock-based awards
excluded from diluted EPS |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
On April 4, 2006, we issued new Debentures to holders who had properly tendered their old
Debentures. This exchange reduced share dilution associated with the Debentures by enabling us to
apply the treasury stock method for calculating diluted EPS related to contingently issuable
shares. See Note 9 for additional information about the exchange.
From the end of our third quarter through August 3, 2006, we repurchased
an additional 0.3 million common shares or less than 1% of outstanding shares. There were no other transactions
during this period that would have materially changed the number of basic or diluted shares outstanding.
During the quarter, IGT prepaid $100.0 million in a structured share repurchase transaction
designed to settle in cash or IGT shares based on the closing stock price on June 29, 2006.
Since the closing price of our stock was above the predetermined threshold price of $35.50 per
share, we received cash of $101.1 million upon settlement in July.
11. Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes is based on estimated effective annual income tax rates. The
provision differs from income taxes currently payable because certain items of income and expense
are recognized in different periods for financial statement purposes than for tax return purposes.
12. Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
|
$ |
331.1 |
|
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Investment securities unrealized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
117.4 |
|
|
$ |
111.4 |
|
|
$ |
363.2 |
|
|
$ |
330.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
IGT has been named in and has brought lawsuits in the normal course of business. We do not expect
the outcome of these suits, including the lawsuits described below, to have a material adverse
effect on our financial position or results of future operations .
Alliance/Bally
On December 7, 2004, IGT filed a complaint in US District Court for the District of Nevada,
alleging that defendants Alliance Gaming Corp., Bally Gaming Intl, Inc., and Bally Gaming, Inc.
infringed six US patents held by IGT, US Patent numbers 6,827,646; 5,848,932; 5,788,573; 5,722,891;
6,712,698; and 6,722,985. On January 21, 2005, defendants filed an answer denying the allegations
in the complaint and raising various affirmative defenses to IGTs asserted claims. Defendants
also asserted fourteen counterclaims against IGT, including counterclaims for a declaratory
judgment of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability of the asserted patents, and for
antitrust violations and intentional interference with prospective business advantage. IGT denies
these allegations and discovery is ongoing.
On April 28, 2006, IGT filed a complaint in US District Court for the District of Delaware,
alleging that defendants Bally Technologies, Inc., Bally Gaming Intl, Inc., and Bally Gaming,
Inc. infringed nine US patents held by IGT, US Patent numbers RE 38,812; RE 37,885; 6,832,958;
6,319,125; 6,244,958; 6,431,983; 6,607,441; 6,565,434; and 6,620,046. The complaint alleges
that the BALLY POWER BONUSING technology infringes one or more of the claims of the asserted
IGT patents. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages and an injunction. On June 30, 2006,
defendants filed an answer denying the allegations in the complaint and raising various
affirmative defenses to IGTs asserted claims. Defendants also asserted twelve counterclaims
against IGT, including counterclaims for a declaratory judgment of non-infringement,
invalidity, unenforceability of the asserted patents, antitrust violations, unfair competition,
and intentional interference with prospective business advantage. IGT denies these
allegations, and has filed a motion to dismiss certain of defendants counterclaims, which is
currently pending. Discovery is ongoing.
Aristocrat
On June 30, 2005, Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Ltd. filed a patent infringement lawsuit
against IGT. The Complaint was served on IGT on December 13, 2005. Aristocrat alleges that IGT
has willfully infringed US Patent No. 6,093,102. Aristocrat contends that the patent covers its
Reel Power® video slot technology and IGTs Multiway® video slot games. The lawsuit seeks
unspecified damages and an injunction. IGT believes that the patent is invalid and not infringed
and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. On January 13, 2006, Aristocrat filed a First
Amended Complaint adding Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. as a plaintiff. On January 19, 2006, IGT
filed its Answer to the First Amended Complaint. Discovery is ongoing
On June 12, 2006, Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Ltd. and Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
filed a patent infringement lawsuit against IGT. Aristocrat alleges that IGT has willfully
infringed US Patent No. 7,056,215, which issued on June 6, 2006. The IGT products named in the
complaint are the Fort Knox® mystery progressive slot machines. IGT believes that the patent is
invalid and not infringed and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Brochu v. Loto Quebec
Loto Quebec commenced an action in warranty against VLC, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
IGT, and another manufacturer of video lottery machines in October 2003, in the Superior Court
of the Province of Quebec, District of Quebec, seeking indemnification for any damages that may
be awarded against Loto Quebec in a class action suit, also filed in the Superior Court of the
Province of Quebec. The class action against Loto Quebec, to which neither IGT nor any of its
affiliates are parties, was filed by Jean Brochu on behalf of himself and a class of other
persons who allegedly developed pathological behaviors through the play of video lottery
machines made available by Loto Quebec in taverns and other public locations. In this action,
plaintiff seeks to recover on behalf of the class damages of approximately CAD$578.7 million,
representing CAD$4,863 per class member, and CAD$119.0 million in punitive damages. Loto
Quebec filed its Plea in Defense in the main action in February 2006. VLC filed its Plea in
Defense in the warranty action in April 2006. The Court has scheduled trial of the entire
action against Loto Quebec to commence in early 2007.
Environmental Matters
CCSC, a casino operation sold by IGT in April 2003, is located in an area that has been designated
by the EPA as a superfund site as a result of contamination from historic mining activity in the
area. The EPA is entitled to proceed against current and prior owners and operators of properties
located within the site for remediation and response costs associated with their properties and
with the entire site. CCSC is located within the drainage basin of North Clear Creek and is
therefore subjected to potentially contaminated surface and ground water from
15
upstream mining related sources. Soil and ground water samples on the site indicate that several
contaminants exist in concentrations exceeding drinking water standards. We have applied the
guidance in Statement of Position 96-1 Environmental Remediation Liabilities and determined that
a liability has not yet been incurred.
Miller
In June 2003, a class action lawsuit was filed in Clark County, Nevada, District Court against
Acres and its directors, entitled Paul Miller v. Acres Gaming Incorporated, et al. The complaint
alleged that Acres directors breached their fiduciary duties to their stockholders in connection
with the approval of the merger transaction between Acres and IGT and sought to enjoin and/or void
the merger agreement among other forms of relief. On September 19, 2003, the Court denied
plaintiffs motion for a TRO to prevent Acres stockholders from voting on the merger. On September
24, 2003, plaintiff petitioned the Nevada Supreme Court to vacate the denial of the TRO and to
enjoin Acres from holding its stockholder vote on the merger. The Nevada Supreme Court denied the
petition on September 25, 2003. The plaintiffs action also seeks damages. On December 23, 2003,
defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint for failure to state a
claim on which relief may be granted. On April 29, 2004, the Court issued a ruling denying
defendants motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. On May 12, 2004, the Court issued an
order denying defendants motion to dismiss. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties on August 13,
2004, plaintiff filed a third amended complaint. The Court denied defendants motion to dismiss
the third amended complaint. On April 7, 2006 defendant filed a Notice of Removal to United States
District Court, D. Nev. (Las Vegas). Plaintiff sought to remand this action to state court, which
was granted in July 2006.
Nevada Sales & Use Tax / Wrongful Termination Matter
In February 2003, an IGT employee, subsequently placed on administrative leave, filed a complaint
under Nevadas False Claims Act (State of Nevada ex rel. James McAndrews v. International Game
Technology, Anchor Coin and Spin for Cash® Wide Area Progressive) alleging that IGT failed to pay
requisite Nevada sales/use taxes on certain Wheel of Fortune® games placed in Nevada since 1997 and
in connection with royalties received under intellectual property licensing agreements related to
the placement of Action Gaming games in Nevada since 1997.
In February 2006, the Nevada Supreme Court ordered the case dismissed and in March 2006, the trial
court entered an order of dismissal. McAndrews, no longer an IGT employee, filed a separate
complaint alleging employment retaliation in June 2006.
In October 2004 and again in July 2005, NDT advised us that we had a good-faith legal basis for our
position that no sales tax was payable on royalties received, but that NDT believed that sales tax
may be payable on some amount of the royalties. We disagreed with NDTs position that sales tax may
be payable on any part of the royalties. In February 2006, the audit of our sales/use tax returns
by NDT for the years April 2000 through March 2003 was completed, and the resulting audit
assessment was immaterial to our operating results, financial position or cash flows.
OSHA / Wrongful Termination Matter
On July 8, 2004, two former employees filed a complaint with the US Department of Labor, OSHA,
alleging retaliatory termination in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The former
employees allege that they were terminated in retaliation for questioning whether Anchor and its
executives failed to properly disclose information allegedly affecting the value of Anchors
patents in connection with IGTs acquisition of Anchor in 2001. The former employees also allege
that the acquired patents are overvalued on the financial statements of IGT. Outside counsel,
retained by an independent committee of our Board of Directors, reviewed the allegations and found
them to be entirely without merit.
On November 10, 2004, the employees withdrew their complaint filed with OSHA and filed a notice of
intent to file a complaint in federal court. On December 1, 2004, a complaint was filed under seal
in the US District Court for Nevada. IGT filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in December 2004.
The court denied the motion on May 2, 2005. IGT appealed this denial to the US Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied our appeal in March 2006.
Discovery is ongoing. IGT believes that the allegations are without merit and intends to
vigorously defend this matter.
In the purchase price allocation, IGT used the relief of royalty valuation methodology to estimate
the fair value of the patents at $164.4 million, which is being amortized over the useful economic
life. The carrying value of the patents at June 30, 2006 totaled $99.1 million, with a remaining
life of approximately 10 years.
Poulos
Along with a number of other public gaming corporations, IGT was a defendant in three class action
lawsuits, later consolidated into a single action. Plaintiffs alleged that the defendants engaged
in fraudulent and misleading conduct by inducing people to play video poker machines and electronic
slot machines, based on
16
false beliefs concerning how the machines operate and the extent to which there is an opportunity
to win on a given play. The amended complaint alleges that the defendants acts constituted
violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, giving rise to claims for
common law fraud and unjust enrichment, and seeks compensatory, special, incidental and punitive
damages of several billion dollars.
In December 1997, the Court denied the motions that would have dismissed the Consolidated Amended
Complaint or that would have stayed the action pending Nevada gaming regulatory action. In June
2002, the Court denied the plaintiffs motion for class certification. An appeal of that denial
was filed timely with the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On August 10, 2004, the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the US District courts denial of class certification. The class
plaintiffs did not appeal the decision and proceeded with only their individual claims. Prior to
the scheduled trial date on September 7, 2005, the US District Court of Nevada granted the
defendants pending motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs timely filed a Notice of Appeal
to the US Ninth Circuit Court. In June 2006, all parties stipulated to dismiss, with prejudice,
this appeal.
Arrangements with Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk, such as performance bonds, guarantees and product warranties not reflected in our balance
sheet. We do not expect any material losses to result from these arrangements, and we are not
dependent on off-balance sheet financing arrangements to fund our operations.
Performance Bonds
Performance bonds outstanding related to gaming operations totaled $29.1 million at June 30, 2006.
We are liable to reimburse the bond issuer in the event of exercise due to nonperformance.
Letters of Credit
Outstanding letters of credit issued under our line of credit to ensure payment to certain vendors
and governmental agencies totaled $4.2 million at June 30, 2006.
IGT Licensor Arrangements
Our sales agreements that include software and intellectual property licensing arrangements may
provide a clause whereby IGT indemnifies the third party licensee against liability and damages
(including legal defense costs) arising from any claims of patent, copyright, trademark or trade
secret infringement. Should such a claim occur, we could be required to make payments to the
licensee for any liabilities or damages incurred. Historically, we have not incurred any
significant costs due to infringement claims. As we consider the likelihood of recurring future
costs to be remote, no liability has been recorded.
Product Warranties
Our warranty costs in the table below are accrued based on historical trends in product failure
rates and expected costs to provide warranty services. The majority of our products are generally
covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to one year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended June 30, |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
Reduction for payments made |
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
Accrual for new warranties issued |
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Adjustments for pre-existing warranties |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-Insurance
We are self-insured for various levels of workers compensation, directors and officers
liability, electronic errors and omissions liability, as well as employee medical, dental,
prescription drug, and disability coverage. We purchase stop loss coverage to protect against
unexpected claims. Accrued insurance claims and reserves include estimated settlements for known
claims, and actuarial estimates of claims incurred but not reported.
State and Federal Taxes
We are subject to sales, use, income and other tax audits and administrative proceedings in various
federal, state, and local jurisdictions. While we believe we have properly reported our tax
liabilities in each jurisdiction, we can give no assurance that taxing authorities will not propose
adjustments that increase our tax liabilities.
17
14. Derivatives
Foreign Currency Hedging
At June 30, 2006, we hedged $184.9 million of net foreign currency exposure with $176.5 million in
forward currency contracts versus $138.8 million of exposure hedged with $127.2 million in forward
currency contracts at September 30, 2005.
Debentures Yield Adjustment
The yield adjustment feature of our Debentures requires contingent cash interest payments that are
triggered by our stock price and is thus considered an embedded derivative under SFAS 133 requiring
bifurcation. However, if an upward adjustment were anticipated to go into effect, IGT could
exercise its redemption right. Therefore, an investor could be expected to attribute no economic
value to the yield adjustment feature. Accordingly, we have ascribed no value and recorded no
derivative asset or liability for this embedded derivative.
15. Business Segments
We view our business in two regional operating segments, each incorporating all types of
revenues:
|
ª |
|
The North America Division aggregates our operations in the US and Canada |
|
|
ª |
|
The International Division aggregates our operations in Asia, Australia, New Zealand,
Europe, Japan, Latin America, Russia, South Africa, and the UK. |
Our business segments are designed to allocate resources within a framework of management
responsibility. Operating costs from one segment may benefit other segments. We continually
evaluate the alignment of our business development and administrative functions for reporting
purposes, which may result in changes to segment allocations. Prior year amounts are reclassified
to conform to the current management view and presentation.
The Corporate Division administers certain unallocated income and expenses related to company-wide
initiatives, including capital deployment, treasury and cash management, as well as administrative
and oversight functions such as human resources, information systems, and legal counsel. The
Corporate Division includes all income and expenses related to debt, certain investment securities,
hedging and other corporate assets.
We do not recognize inter-company revenues or expenses upon the transfer of gaming products between
divisions. IGTs segment profit reflects income before tax.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
481.3 |
|
|
$ |
480.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,459.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,420.1 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
187.2 |
|
|
|
182.6 |
|
|
|
595.3 |
|
|
|
548.6 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
294.1 |
|
|
|
298.1 |
|
|
|
864.5 |
|
|
|
871.5 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
181.5 |
|
|
|
188.2 |
|
|
|
566.9 |
|
|
|
518.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
131.1 |
|
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
|
$ |
413.2 |
|
|
$ |
351.7 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
110.4 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
360.0 |
|
|
|
332.3 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
97.0 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Division |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit |
|
$ |
(37.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(31.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(102.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(83.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
612.4 |
|
|
$ |
579.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,873.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,771.8 |
|
Product sales |
|
|
297.6 |
|
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
955.3 |
|
|
|
880.9 |
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
314.8 |
|
|
|
305.1 |
|
|
|
917.7 |
|
|
|
890.9 |
|
Segment profit |
|
|
174.6 |
|
|
|
180.0 |
|
|
|
561.1 |
|
|
|
517.4 |
|
18
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
COMPANY OVERVIEW
The following discussion is intended to enhance the readers understanding of changes in the
financial condition and results of operations of International Game Technology. It should be read
in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005.
Throughout this section, table amounts are presented in millions, except units, ASP, ARPU, ARDU,
and EPS.
Italicized text with an attached superscript trademark or copyright notation in this document
indicates trademarks or registered trademarks of IGT or its licensors in the US and/or other
countries. For a complete list of trademark and copyright ownership information, please visit our
website at www.IGT.com.
Our managements discussion and analysis is organized into the following sections:
|
ª |
|
OUR BUSINESS a general description of our business and operating segments |
|
|
ª |
|
OUR FOCUS a summary of our strategies and opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS a discussion of recently issued accounting
standards with significance to our business |
|
|
ª |
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES a discussion of accounting policies that require
critical judgments and estimates |
|
|
ª |
|
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS a year-over-year comparative analysis of net income
for the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2006 |
|
|
ª |
|
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS a year-over-year comparative analysis of business segment
results for the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2006 |
|
|
ª |
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES a year-over-year comparative analysis of cash flows
and capital resources for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 |
|
|
ª |
|
FINANCIAL CONDITION - analysis of significant changes in our financial position |
OUR BUSINESS
International Game Technology is a global company specializing in the design, development,
manufacturing, distribution and sales of computerized gaming machines and systems products. We
strive to maintain a diverse portfolio of gaming products that span a wide range of categories and
target customer markets with a variety of games, platforms and systems offered to gaming
jurisdictions worldwide.
We generated annual revenues of $2.4 billion in fiscal 2005. We derive our revenues in two ways,
either from the sale (product sales) or placement (gaming operations) of our gaming products,
services and/or intellectual property. Operating results reviewed by our chief decision makers
encompass all revenue sources within each geographical customer region. We view our business in
two regional operating segments, each incorporating all types of revenues:
|
ª |
|
The North America Division encompasses our operations in the US and Canada |
|
|
ª |
|
The International Division oversees our efforts abroad in Asia, Australia, New
Zealand, Europe, Japan, Latin America, Russia, South Africa, and the UK |
Additionally, our Corporate Division administers certain unallocated income and expenses related to
company-wide initiatives. See the BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS below and Note 15 of our Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional segment information and financial
results.
OUR FOCUS
Our business strategies remain focused on:
|
ª |
|
the development and expansion of our product offerings |
|
|
ª |
|
capitalizing on new and expanding market opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
developing or acquiring access to important intellectual property |
|
|
ª |
|
strategic acquisitions and alliances to enable development of leading gaming technology |
|
|
ª |
|
ensuring access to new distribution channels |
19
Product Demand
Demand for our products is driven by:
|
ª |
|
technological innovations that enhance the gaming players experience and which add
casino operational efficiencies |
|
|
ª |
|
new or expanding gaming properties and markets |
|
|
ª |
|
our reputation for providing reliable products, as well as excellent customer service and support |
We expect future machine replacement sales will be driven by customer desires to update their floor
with newer games and technologies. We anticipate an acceleration of this trend as we transition to
server-based technology. We also see margin expansion opportunities generated by our diversified
product mix, including contribution from non-machine products, including systems, parts,
conversions, royalties and licensing fees.
Product Development
Our business model involves the creation and delivery of game content through machine
platforms and integrated systems solutions. We accomplish this by anticipating consumer needs,
responding to feedback and marketing trends, and pioneering innovative gaming machines and
integrated systems applications. Our product development efforts are supported by a considerable
emphasis and investment in research and development of future technology, which we believe will
enable IGT to maintain a leadership position in our industry.
Game Libraries
We continue to expand our for-sale and proprietary game libraries, emphasizing development of games
to address changing consumer preferences and other market trends. We strive to develop games that
incorporate exciting winning combinations, innovative and entertaining bonus events, and appealing
graphics and sound. We are actively creating new themes for video reel and video poker products,
as well as incorporating the popular multi-line multi-coin configuration into our spinning reel
products. The current year introduction of our first communal gaming device, Wheel of Fortune®
Super Spin, our new AVP® Trimline product, and Instant Bingo product for Oklahoma continue to be
well-received by both customers and player alike, and are generating a sound backlog of orders. We
apply strategies for improving gaming operations yields by enhancing the mix of products and
jurisdictions of our installed base, as well as expanding proprietary themes for our multi-level
progressive brands, including Party Time!®, Fort Knoxâ, and Jackpot Hunter.
Server-based Initiatives
We continue to invest significantly in new technologies for the future, particularly our
server-based initiatives. We are focused on providing operators with server-based tools to more
efficiently manage their slot floors and deliver exciting new gaming experiences to the players.
We recently commenced the third commercial field trial of our server-based system, marking another
milestone in a long process of regulatory submittals, development and live testing in several
jurisdictions. Over the next 18 to 24 months, we will continue refining and enhancing the core
technology, as well as identifying customer needs and pursuing development efforts critical to game
applications that will run on the server-based system. We will also work to obtain necessary
regulatory approvals to offer the technology on a commercial basis, most likely beginning in 2008
and becoming more meaningful in 2009.
Table Management System
We continue our product integration efforts with PGIC and SMI to create a comprehensive automated
table management system, the Table iD (formerly known as Intelligent Table System), combining
complementary capabilities, technologies, and resources of the three companies. The first tier of
the three-tier development process features upgraded player tracking and table game accounting
functions. The second and third tiers will include RFID automated bet recognition, enhanced game
tracking and complete game and player analysis. We began testing the product with one Nevada
customer and anticipate commercial introduction in 2007. We expect a well-implemented casino
management and patron loyalty system will offer strategic and competitive value to a casinos slot
operations. We view the extension of this technology into the table games area as the next logical
phase in the expansion of these products.
Market Opportunities
We remain largely dependent on gaming market expansion for growth, which has been slower than
expected with delays surrounding legislative actions and regulatory approvals. Although the timing
remains uncertain, we do expect that opportunities will eventually come from new jurisdictions and
expansion of existing markets. Meaningful growth in new or expanding North America markets does
not appear likely until 2007 and beyond. Current year market growth has been primarily
attributable to greater contributions from international operations.
20
The outlook for international market expansion continues to improve, as we focus on opportunities
in Asia and Latin America. Japans transition from Regulation Four to Regulation Five will require
replacement of approximately 1.5 million pachisuro machines by September 2007. We anticipate
introducing at least one game per quarter commencing next quarter and throughout fiscal 2007. In
Latin America, Mexicos CDS market continues to expand and is a primary current year driver of
growth in our proprietary installed base. We estimate our Mexico installed base will reach 5,000
games by September 2006 and 7,000 games by September 2007.
Around the world we are concentrating our development resources toward product localization, so we
export a product customized for local cultures. With the prospects of new international
jurisdictions, we anticipate our international markets will continue to grow in significance over
the next several years and increase their share of overall contribution.
We continue to monitor expanding and emerging markets in North America as states consider some form
of legalized gaming. Regulatory developments made during our third quarter from which we
anticipate fiscal 2007 expansion include:
|
ª |
|
Florida granted IGT the first manufacturers license for placement of gaming devices in
Broward County |
|
|
ª |
|
Pennsylvania regulators resolved a distributorship matter and are now reviewing
applications for operator licenses |
|
|
ª |
|
Arkansas regulators are finalizing regulations to allow electronic games of skill, such
as video poker, at racetracks |
There is the potential for new and renegotiated tribal state compacts in California that could spur
further expansion in fiscal 2007. The Oklahoma market recently expanded to include Class III
compacted gaming in addition to CDS and Class II gaming. New York continues to expand its program
with anticipated future racino openings in Yonkers for late fiscal 2006 and Aqueduct in late
calendar 2007. We gained incremental market share in New York and Rhode Island in the current
quarter through a reallocation process based on our product performance.
Competition
The market for gaming machines and systems is intensely competitive principally through new
product development. We maintain a global competitive advantage because of our ability to:
|
ª |
|
offer a dynamic and diverse library of innovative and strong performing games |
|
|
ª |
|
develop and protect our extensive collection of intellectual properties |
|
|
ª |
|
provide the highest levels of customer service and support |
We also competitively benefit from our:
|
ª |
|
financial strength to aggressively research and develop new products, as well as
invest in strategic acquisitions and alliances |
|
|
ª |
|
extensive and well established infrastructure of sales and manufacturing |
|
|
ª |
|
worldwide recognition and geographic diversity |
We currently hold a significant share of the total gaming devices on North America casino floors.
Within that population, our share of spinning reel and video poker machines remains stable, but we
are experiencing increased competitive pressure within the video spinning reel gaming machines
business. We expect to maintain a leading share of the total population of gaming devices and
systems installed over the long-term, despite quarterly fluctuations that will occur from time to
time. With our IGT Advantageä systems, we continue to capture market share, maintaining
relationships with most major gaming operators. We have installed 596 IGT slot systems worldwide
at June 30, 2006 versus 481 systems at June 30, 2005.
Capital Deployment
We continue to generate substantial operating cash flows, affording us the flexibility to reinvest
in our business through capital expenditures and business alliances, as well as to provide returns
to our shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. See the LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES section that follows for additional information, including current share repurchases and
dividends paid.
We build strategic business alliances as part of our ongoing efforts to create shareholder value
designed to complement our internal resources. During fiscal 2006, we purchased a minority equity
interest in Walker Digitals gaming subsidiary, Casino IP Holdings, LLC, and executed agreements
for cooperative product development and marketing. This relationship is providing access to an
intellectual property portfolio focused on the creative use of casino networks, particularly for
player preferences, which we expect will facilitate our server-based product line.
21
Hurricane Impact
We suffered damages and losses to our US gulf coast operations in the wake of hurricanes in August
and September 2005. At June 30, 2006, approximately 500 gaming operations machines remain out of
service. See Note 1 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In the first quarter of fiscal 2006, we adopted SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment, and
recognized share-based compensation in our financial statements. See the CONSOLIDATED OPERATING
RESULTS section that follows for a discussion of the impact to operating results for the current
quarter and nine months and Note 2 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information regarding the adoption of SFAS 123R .
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the US, which require us to make assumptions and estimates about future
events and apply judgments that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Because future events and
their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions
and estimates and those differences could be material. We base our estimates on historical
experience, current trends in our company, and the industry as a whole, and other factors
management considers relevant when preparing our consolidated financial statements.
We consider the following accounting estimates to be the most critical to aid in fully
understanding and evaluating our reported financial results and they require us to make difficult,
subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain or variable. Senior
management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of the following accounting
estimates, considered most sensitive to changes from external factors, with the Audit Committee of
our Board of Directors.
|
ª |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
ª |
|
Jackpot liabilities and expenses |
|
|
ª |
|
Intangible assets, goodwill and prepaid royalties |
|
|
ª |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
ª |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
ª |
|
Inventory and gaming operations equipment |
Except for the addition of share-based compensation below, we have made no significant changes to
our critical accounting estimates since those presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2005.
Share-based Compensation
We began accounting for share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123R in the first quarter
of fiscal 2006. Under the fair value recognition provisions, we estimate share-based compensation
at the award grant date and recognize expense over the service period. Option valuation models
require the input of highly subjective assumptions, and changes in the assumptions used can
materially affect the fair value estimate. Additionally, judgment is required in estimating stock
price volatility, forfeiture rates, expected dividends, and expected terms that options remain
outstanding. See Note 2 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information regarding the adoption of SFAS 123R.
22
CONSOLIDATED
OPERATING RESULTS A Year Over Year Comparative Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
June 30, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
(In millions except units, ASP, ARPU, ARDU & EPS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
612.4 |
|
|
$ |
579.6 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
1,873.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,771.8 |
|
|
$ |
101.2 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
332.5 |
|
|
|
308.2 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
1,014.6 |
|
|
|
894.9 |
|
|
|
119.7 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
6 |
% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
171.6 |
|
|
$ |
167.4 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
550.0 |
|
|
$ |
503.3 |
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
(1 |
)pp |
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
Net income |
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
$ |
358.8 |
|
|
$ |
331.1 |
|
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Diluted EPS |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
209.1 |
|
|
$ |
185.8 |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
685.3 |
|
|
$ |
652.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.1 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Non-machine |
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
270.0 |
|
|
|
228.7 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
297.6 |
|
|
|
274.5 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
955.3 |
|
|
|
880.9 |
|
|
|
74.4 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
$ |
148.9 |
|
|
$ |
143.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
481.6 |
|
|
$ |
435.2 |
|
|
$ |
46.4 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
(2 |
)pp |
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
2 |
% |
Units sold |
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
-2 |
% |
|
|
89,500 |
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
(12,500 |
) |
|
|
-12 |
% |
ASP |
|
$ |
8,900 |
|
|
$ |
7,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
$ |
7,700 |
|
|
$ |
6,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
12,600 |
|
|
$ |
11,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
10,700 |
|
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
314.8 |
|
|
$ |
305.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
917.7 |
|
|
$ |
890.9 |
|
|
$ |
26.8 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
183.6 |
|
|
|
164.5 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
533.0 |
|
|
|
459.7 |
|
|
|
73.3 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
4 |
pp |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
6 |
pp |
|
|
12 |
% |
Installed base units |
|
|
46,200 |
|
|
|
38,500 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
46,200 |
|
|
|
38,500 |
|
|
|
7,700 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
ARDU |
|
$ |
76.00 |
|
|
$ |
88.00 |
|
|
$ |
(12.00 |
) |
|
|
-14 |
% |
|
$ |
77.00 |
|
|
$ |
87.00 |
|
|
$ |
(10.00 |
) |
|
|
-11 |
% |
Consolidated operating results improved over the prior year periods, notwithstanding a
decrease in consolidated units sold, primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
increasing game placements and operating efficiencies in gaming operations |
|
|
ª |
|
strong broad-based international operating results |
|
|
ª |
|
a favorable mix of premium products including newer North America platform product sales |
EPS was positively impacted by share repurchases and the April 4, 2006 exchange of our old
Debentures for new Debentures with a net settlement feature. See Notes 9 and 10 of our Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding this exchange.
Consolidated Product Sales
Revenues and gross profits grew in the current periods driven by improvements across most
international markets and an increasing mix of premium products, including our AVP® Trimline
machines. Growing contributions from non-machine sales of gaming systems, parts and game theme
conversions contributed to increased revenues and gross profits in the current nine-month period.
Gross margins in the current quarter declined due to a slightly lower mix of North America
non-machine revenues coupled with higher international shi pp
ing costs. We estimate our
consolidated product sales gross margins will fluctuate between 48% and 50% for the remainder of
fiscal 2006 and into fiscal 2007 depending on the geographical mix and types of products sold.
ARPU improved in the current periods primarily due to a favorable mix of premium products,
increased international non-machine revenues and fewer lower-margin pachisuro games in the
nine-month period.
23
Consolidated Gaming Operations
Revenue growth in the current quarter and nine months of fiscal 2006 is primarily attributable to
installed base growth in both casino and lease operations and stronger performance in North America
WAP, MLP and CDS games. Drivers of gross margin and profit expansion year over year included:
|
ª |
|
lower jackpot expenses related to effective yield management strategies, and favorable shifts in interest rates |
|
|
ª |
|
success with our low-denomination and multi-level progressive (MLP) games |
|
|
ª |
|
increased contribution from MLP, CDS, and lease operations games providing lower yields,
but higher margins |
|
|
ª |
|
additional asset obsolescence charges in North America during the prior year nine months |
We estimate our consolidated gaming operations gross margin will trend between 57% and 59% for the
remainder of fiscal 2006, depending on the mix of game placements, movements in interest rates and
play levels.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
92.9 |
|
|
$ |
86.3 |
|
|
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
|
|
-8 |
% |
|
$ |
270.2 |
|
|
$ |
236.5 |
|
|
$ |
(33.7 |
) |
|
|
-14 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
-23 |
% |
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
103.8 |
|
|
|
(25.9 |
) |
|
|
-25 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
-30 |
% |
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
-24 |
% |
Bad debt provisions |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
-260 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
160.9 |
|
|
$ |
140.8 |
|
|
$ |
(20.1 |
) |
|
|
-14 |
% |
|
$ |
464.6 |
|
|
$ |
391.6 |
|
|
$ |
(73.0 |
) |
|
|
-19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of revenues |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
)pp |
|
|
-8 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
)pp |
|
|
-14 |
% |
Operating expenses increased over the prior year periods primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
legal and compliance costs related to intellectual property acquisition and protection,
as well as regulatory requirements for new products |
|
|
ª |
|
additional investment in R&D to support next generation technologies |
|
|
ª |
|
current SFAS 123R share-based compensation of $7.9 million for the quarter and $24.5
million for the nine months |
|
|
ª |
|
additional WagerWorks operating expenses of $7.2 million for the quarter and $18.7
million for the nine months, including amortization of acquired intangibles |
Other Income (Expense) and Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
$ |
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
-42 |
% |
|
$ |
48.0 |
|
|
$ |
60.1 |
|
|
$ |
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
-20 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(37.9 |
) |
|
|
(43.2 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense) |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
$ |
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.1 |
|
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provisions |
|
$ |
60.5 |
|
|
$ |
65.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
202.3 |
|
|
$ |
186.3 |
|
|
$ |
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Tax rate |
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income decreased in the current periods primarily due to the prior year realization
of financing fees on early customer loan repayments totaling $10.2 million. The deconsolidation of
the NJ trust also resulted in lower interest income and interest expense. See Note 1 of our
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about the NJ trusts
deconsolidation. Other improved as a result of legal settlement charges in the prior year periods.
Our current third quarter tax provision and rate was reduced primarily due to one-time adjustments
of $2.7 million. We anticipate our effective tax rate will range between 36% and 37% for the
remainder of fiscal 2006 and into fiscal 2007, exclusive of one-time items.
24
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS A Year Over Year Comparative Analysis
Operating income for each division reflects a pplicable operating expenses. See Note 15 of
our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional business segment
information.
North America Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
June 30, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
(In millions, except units, ASP, ARPU) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
481.3 |
|
|
$ |
480.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,459.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,420.1 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
269.7 |
|
|
|
258.8 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
819.2 |
|
|
|
740.8 |
|
|
|
78.4 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
4 |
pp |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
175.8 |
|
|
$ |
174.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
550.5 |
|
|
$ |
497.0 |
|
|
$ |
53.5 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
1 |
pp |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
123.9 |
|
|
$ |
111.9 |
|
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
387.8 |
|
|
$ |
364.4 |
|
|
$ |
23.4 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Non-machine |
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
70.7 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
-10 |
% |
|
|
207.5 |
|
|
|
184.2 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
187.2 |
|
|
|
182.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
595.3 |
|
|
|
548.6 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
99.6 |
|
|
$ |
99.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
321.8 |
|
|
$ |
296.5 |
|
|
$ |
25.3 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
(2 |
)pp |
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
pp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units sold |
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
12,300 |
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
39,400 |
|
|
|
40,300 |
|
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
-2 |
% |
ASP |
|
$ |
10,100 |
|
|
$ |
9,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
9,800 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
15,300 |
|
|
$ |
14,800 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
15,100 |
|
|
$ |
13,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
294.1 |
|
|
$ |
298.1 |
|
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
$ |
864.5 |
|
|
$ |
871.5 |
|
|
$ |
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
159.1 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
497.4 |
|
|
|
444.3 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
5 |
pp |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
7 |
pp |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installed base units |
|
|
40,400 |
|
|
|
37,400 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
40,400 |
|
|
|
37,400 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
The North America division posted improved operating results in the current quarter and nine
months from the combined performance in product sales and gaming operations.
North America Product Sales
Product sales revenues, ASP and ARPU increased in the current quarter and nine months of fiscal
2006 despite slightly lower unit volumes due to an improved premium product mix that included our
new AVP® Trimline machines. The third quarter margin decline is attributable to the lower
contribution from higher margin non-machine revenues, primarily due to decreases in parts and
conversions sales.
North America Gaming Operations
Gaming operations revenues declined slightly in the current periods, as our installed base growth
is increasingly comprised of MLP, CDS and lease operations games that provide lower per unit
revenues but higher gross margins. Gross profit and margin improvements are primarily attributable
to:
|
ª |
|
lower jackpot expenses related to effective yield management strategies, and favorable shifts in interest rates |
|
|
ª |
|
increased contribution from MLP, CDS, and lease operations games |
|
|
ª |
|
additional asset obsolescence charges during the first nine months of fiscal 2005
related to demand transitioning toward our newer platform games |
The growth in our installed base resulted primarily from placements of:
|
ª |
|
Instant Bingo and poker products in Oklahoma |
|
|
ª |
|
CDS and Class II units in California, Alabama, and Florida |
|
|
ª |
|
lease operations games in New York and Rhode Island |
While growth in our installed base is largely dependent on gaming industry expansion, we
continually focus on strategies to improve yields, including managing the types of games and
jurisdictions, replacement of underperforming games with higher yielding games, the pace of new
game introductions, and the size of initial progressive jackpots.
25
International Division
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Favorable |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
June 30, |
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
(In millions, except units, ASP, ARPU) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
131.1 |
|
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
|
$ |
32.2 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
413.2 |
|
|
$ |
351.7 |
|
|
$ |
61.5 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
49.4 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
195.4 |
|
|
|
154.1 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
(2 |
) pp |
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
3 |
pp |
|
|
7 |
% |
Operating income |
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
|
$ |
13.0 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
(4 |
) pp |
|
|
-17 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
pp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machines |
|
$ |
85.2 |
|
|
$ |
73.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
297.5 |
|
|
$ |
287.8 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Non-machine |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Total product sales |
|
|
110.4 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
360.0 |
|
|
|
332.3 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
$ |
49.3 |
|
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
159.8 |
|
|
$ |
138.7 |
|
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Gross margin |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
(3 |
) pp |
|
|
-6 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
2 |
pp |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units sold |
|
|
11,300 |
|
|
|
11,800 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
|
|
50,100 |
|
|
|
61,700 |
|
|
|
(11,600 |
) |
|
|
-19 |
% |
ASP |
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
6,300 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
5,900 |
|
|
$ |
4,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
ARPU |
|
$ |
9,800 |
|
|
$ |
7,800 |
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
7,200 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaming operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
|
196 |
% |
|
$ |
53.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
|
|
174 |
% |
Installed base units |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
427 |
% |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
427 |
% |
International division improvements for the current quarter and nine months are the result of
growth in both product sales and gaming operations.
Growth in international product sales, gross profit and ARPU during the current periods reflects
increases in the UK, Europe, Australia and Asia, mostly related to greater contributions from
premium products and non-machine revenues. Latin America also improved product sales during the
nine-month period.
International product sales gross margin declined in the current quarter primarily due to higher
shipping costs. Margin improvement for the nine-month period is primarily due to fewer low margin
pachisuro machines in Japan and increasing contributions from high margin non-machine revenues.
The first nine months of fiscal 2006 includes second quarter sales of 11,800 Nobunaga 2 games, our
first pachisuro game developed under Japans new, more restrictive Regulation Five requirements.
International margins will fluctuate depending upon the geographic mix of product sales, especially
related to contributions from Japan. Successes in Japan can add incrementally to gross profit and
operating income, but lower priced pachisuro games provide reduced gross margins. Future operating
results may be impacted by transitions in Japan regulations affecting the timing of new sales, as
well as additional environmental compliance efforts related to European Union RoHS (Restriction on
Certain Hazardous Substances) Directives for the elimination of lead and other heavy metals in
electronic products.
International gaming operations revenue improvements are attributable to installed base growth,
driven by CDS placements in Mexicos growing market, as well as the introduction of WAP games in
South Africa.
26
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Resources
Our principal source of liquidity is cash generated from operations, which allows us to
reinvest in our business. Other sources of capital include, but are not limited to, the issuance
of public or private placement debt, bank borrowings under our credit facility and the issuance of
equity securities. We expect our available capital resources will sufficiently fund current
capital expenditures and operating requirements, scheduled debt repayments, dividends, interest
and income tax obligations.
Our working capital increased to $950.7 million at June 30, 2006 from $219.6 million at September
30, 2005, primarily due to the classification of our Debentures to non-current with the expiration
of holders rights to cash redemption on January 29, 2006. Because the market price condition for
convertibility of our Debentures was satisfied for the July 18, 2006 through October 13, 2006
conversion period the new Debentures will be classified as current liabilities during the fourth
quarter. Working capital statistics for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
the prior year period as follows:
|
ª |
|
average days sales outstanding increased to 75 days versus 68 days |
|
|
ª |
|
inventory turns increased to 3.9 compared to 3.3 |
Cash Flows Summary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Favorable |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Unfavorable) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
$ |
382.5 |
|
|
$ |
562.3 |
|
|
$ |
(179.8 |
) |
|
|
-32 |
% |
Investing |
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(288.6 |
) |
|
|
201.7 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Financing |
|
|
(228.2 |
) |
|
|
(275.1 |
) |
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Effects of exchange rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change |
|
$ |
67.4 |
|
|
$ |
(4.1 |
) |
|
$ |
71.5 |
|
|
|
1744 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations
Operating cash flows for the first nine months of fiscal 2006 decreased from the prior year period primarily due to:
|
ª |
|
increased receivables consistent with growth in product sales |
|
|
ª |
|
additional prepayments to secure long-term licensing rights |
|
|
ª |
|
income tax payment timing |
|
|
ª |
|
current year classification of excess tax benefits from employee stock plans in
financing cash flows as a result of SFAS 123R accounting changes |
Fluctuations in net cash flows related to WAP jackpot liabilities reflect timing variations in
jackpot life cycles, slot play volumes, and winner payments. The deconsolidation of New Jerseys
past winner liabilities is also reducing amounts of winner payments, as well as investing cash
flows from jackpot annuity proceeds. See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in our
most recent Form 10-K for additional information about accounting for jackpot liabilities.
Investing
Additional investing cash flows provided in the current nine months compared to last year is
predominantly due to net investment securities proceeds, offset by our equity investment in Casino
IP Holdings, LLC and additional capital expenditures. Current year capital investments include
ongoing construction of our new Las Vegas campus and gaming operations equipment additions
consistent with installed base growth (refer to OPERATING RESULTS discussion above).
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
48.7 |
|
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Gaming operations equipment |
|
|
153.2 |
|
|
|
113.2 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
Intellectual property |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
-19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
216.7 |
|
|
$ |
166.2 |
|
|
$ |
50.5 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Financing
Fluctuations in financing cash flows are primarily due to additional current period proceeds from
employee stock plans, including excess tax benefits realized, offset by additional debt payments.
Stock Repurchase Plan
Under the 1990 IGT common stock repurchase plan, as amended and adjusted for stock splits,
our remaining share repurchase authorization totaled 17.7 million at June 30, 2006. We repurchase
shares in open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions and
other factors, to return value to shareholders and reduce outstanding share dilution. We
repurchased 5.4 million shares for an aggregate price of $176.1 million in the first nine months of
fiscal 2006. We repurchased an additional 0.3 million shares after June 30, 2006 through August 3, 2006 for an
aggregate price of $11.9 million.
During the current quarter, we prepaid $100.0 million in a structured share repurchase transaction
designed to settle in cash or IGT shares based on the closing stock price on June 29, 2006. Since
the closing price of our stock was above the predetermined threshold price of $35.50 per share, we
received cash of $101.1 million upon settlement in July. In September 2005, we prepaid $74.0
million in a similar structured share repurchase transaction, which resulted in cash received of
$77.8 million because our stock price was above the predetermined threshold price of $27.40 per
share on November 15, 2005. The results of these transactions are reflected in stockholders
equity. We may use structured share repurchases again in the future.
Credit Facilities and Indebtedness (See Note 9 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements)
On April 4, 2006, we completed the exchange of 99.5% or $964.8 million aggregate principal
amount at maturity of our old Debentures for new Debentures with a net share settlement feature,
which requires us to settle the conversion obligation to holders in cash up to the accreted
principal amount and in common shares for any remaining conversion value. All other terms of the
new Debentures are substantially the same.
On December 20, 2005, we entered into an amended and restated unsecured $2.5 billion credit
facility with a syndicate of banks, replacing the previous credit facility of $1.5 billion. We
continue to be in full compliance with all covenants contained in all debt agreements at June 30,
2006.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
June 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,946.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,864.4 |
|
|
$ |
81.8 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,756.8 |
|
|
|
1,958.7 |
|
|
|
(201.9 |
) |
|
|
-10 |
% |
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,189.4 |
|
|
|
1,905.7 |
|
|
|
283.7 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
Total assets and liabilities decreased by $139.2 million during the current period with the
deconsolidation of our NJ trust VIEs as explained in Note 1 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements. This decrease to total assets was offset by increases in:
|
ª |
|
receivables related to sales timing |
|
|
ª |
|
other assets related to prepaid licensing rights, intellectual property investments, and
an outstanding prepaid structured share repurchase transaction |
|
|
ª |
|
property, plant and equipment |
Total liabilities also decreased due to employee incentives and taxes paid during the current
period.
Total stockholders equity increased during the first nine months of fiscal 2006 primarily as the result of:
|
ª |
|
earnings |
|
|
ª |
|
proceeds from employee stock plans |
|
|
ª |
|
partially offset by dividends declared and share repurchases |
Arrangements With Off-Balance Sheet Risks
In the normal course of business, we are a party to financial instruments with off-balance
sheet risk such as performance bonds and other guarantees not reflected in our balance sheet. We
do not expect any material
losses to result from these off-balance sheet arrangements and we are not dependent on off-balance
sheet financing arrangements to fund our operations. See Note 13 of our Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional disclosures of arrangements with off-balance sheet
risk.
28
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors and Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements which do not relate to historical or current
facts, but are forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to analyses and other information based on forecasts
of future results and estimates of amounts not yet determinable. These statements may also relate
to future events or trends, our future prospects and proposed new products, services, developments
or business strategies, among other things. These statements can generally (although not always)
be identified by their use of terms and phrases such as anticipate, believe, could, would,
estimate, expect, intend, may, plan, predict, project, pursue, will, continue, and other similar
terms and phrases, as well as the use of the future tense.
Examples of forward looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to, the
following categories of expectations about:
|
ª |
|
our ability to introduce new products and stimulate replacement demand |
|
|
ª |
|
the timing of new product introductions |
|
|
ª |
|
our market share, competitive advantage, and leadership position |
|
|
ª |
|
the advantages offered to our customers by our products |
|
|
ª |
|
the total market installed base |
|
|
ª |
|
gaming expansion and new market opportunities |
|
|
ª |
|
critical accounting estimates |
|
|
ª |
|
tax exposure and tax rates |
|
|
ª |
|
future gross margins |
|
|
ª |
|
available capital resources |
|
|
ª |
|
possible losses from off-balance sheet arrangements |
|
|
ª |
|
increasing growth or contributions |
|
|
ª |
|
future gaming product developments |
|
|
ª |
|
ensuring access to new distribution channels |
|
|
ª |
|
developing or acquiring access to important intellectual property |
|
|
ª |
|
regulatory developments |
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward looking statements are
reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied. The forward
looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date of
this Quarterly Report. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any
forward looking statements, are subject to change and to inherent known and unknown risks and
uncertainties. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update our forward looking
statements to reflect future events or circumstances.
We urge you to carefully review the following discussion of the specific risks and uncertainties
that affect our business. These include, but are not limited to, the following:
Our success in the gaming industry depends in large part on our ability to develop innovative
products and systems and would be adversely affected by:
|
ª |
|
a decline in the popularity of our gaming products with players |
|
|
ª |
|
a lack of success in developing new products |
|
|
ª |
|
an inability to roll out new games on schedule |
|
|
ª |
|
an increase in the popularity of competitors games |
|
|
ª |
|
a negative change in the trend of consumer acceptance of our newest systems innovations |
Our business is vulnerable to changing economic conditions, including:
|
ª |
|
unfavorable changes in economic conditions including those that affect the relative
health of the gaming industry |
|
|
ª |
|
unfavorable changes in tax laws or application of such laws that could reduce our profitability |
|
|
ª |
|
political or economic instability in international markets |
|
|
ª |
|
changes in interest rates causing a reduction of investment income or in the value of
market rate sensitive instruments |
|
|
ª |
|
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, tariffs and other trade barriers |
|
|
ª |
|
an inability to effectively hedge our foreign currency exposures |
29
Demand for our products would be adversely affected by:
|
ª |
|
reduced growth or continued delays of new market openings and/or existing market expansions |
|
|
ª |
|
delays of planned or scheduled openings of new casinos or property expansions |
|
|
ª |
|
reduced levels of play or weakened customer demand for our gaming machines as a result
of declines in travel activity, jackpot fatigue (declining interest in smaller jackpots) or
customer capital expenditures |
|
|
ª |
|
a decrease in the desire of established gaming properties to upgrade machines, resulting
in a decline in the demand for replacement machines |
|
|
ª |
|
uncertain timing for technology upgrades |
|
|
ª |
|
product anomalies and/or fraudulent manipulation of our gaming products |
|
|
ª |
|
loss of casino floor space to table games |
|
|
ª |
|
casino operators designing and developing slot machine content |
|
|
ª |
|
casino operators developing strategic alliances with competitors |
|
|
ª |
|
a decline in public acceptance of gaming |
We operate in a highly regulated industry and our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions
could be adversely affected by:
|
ª |
|
unfavorable public referendums or anti-gaming legislation |
|
|
ª |
|
unfavorable legislation or government efforts affecting or directed at manufacturers or
gaming operators, such as referendums to increase gaming taxes |
|
|
ª |
|
environmental protection measures which may restrict our ability to sell or place our
products in certain jurisdictions |
|
|
ª |
|
adverse changes in or findings of non-compliance with applicable governmental gaming regulations |
|
|
ª |
|
delays in legislative actions and/or approvals from regulatory agencies |
|
|
ª |
|
a limitation, conditioning, suspension or revocation of any of our gaming licenses |
|
|
ª |
|
unfavorable determinations or challenges of suitability by gaming regulatory authorities
with respect to our officers, directors or key employees |
|
|
ª |
|
customers inability to repay IGT development financing loans due to unfavorable
legislation, regulation, or regulatory interpretation that impairs their ability to conduct
planned gaming operations |
Our intellectual property rights are subject to risks, including:
|
ª |
|
potential inability to obtain, maintain and protect our patents, trademarks, copyrights
or theme licensing rights used competitively in development of our games and technology |
|
|
ª |
|
competitors infringement upon our existing trademarks, patents and copyrights |
|
|
ª |
|
approval of competitors patent applications that may restrict our ability to compete effectively |
Our outstanding debt obligations subject us to certain additional risks, including:
|
ª |
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions |
|
|
ª |
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital,
capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements |
|
|
ª |
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and
the industry |
Our business operations are subject to other risks, including:
|
ª |
|
loss or retirement of our key executives or other key employees |
|
|
ª |
|
adverse changes in the creditworthiness of parties with whom we have significant
receivables or forward currency exchange contracts |
|
|
ª |
|
the discovery of facts or determinations by judges, juries or other finders of facts not
presently known to us or not in accordance with our evaluation of possible liability or the
outcome of litigation related to legal actions brought by or pending against IGT |
|
|
ª |
|
the timely and cost effective integration of acquired companies into our operations |
|
|
ª |
|
increased costs due to reliance on third party suppliers and contract manufacturers |
|
|
ª |
|
agreements with casinos in Native America jurisdictions with sovereign immunity |
|
|
ª |
|
natural disasters, acts of war or terrorist incidents |
|
|
ª |
|
continued work through several implementation phases of our company-wide ERP solution
for computer system procedures and controls; any failures, difficulties or significant
delays in implementing or maintaining computer information systems could result in material
adverse consequences to our business, including disruption of operations, loss of
information and unanticipated increases in costs |
30
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Except for the changes to Convertible Debentures Price Risk below, there have been no
material changes in our assessment of sensitivity to market risk since those presented in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 7A, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005.
Convertible Debentures Price Risk
The fair value of our Debentures is affected by changes in the price of IGT stock and changes in
interest rates. The Debentures fair value will typically increase as our stock price increases
and decrease if our stock price decreases. In general, the fair value of fixed interest rate debt
increases as interest rates fall and decreases as interest rates rise. The stock price and
interest rate changes impact the fair value of the Debentures, but do not affect our financial
position, cash flows or results of operations. The fair value based on quoted market prices
totaled $782.5 million as of June 30, 2006 and $615.2 million as of September 30, 2005. See Note
9 of our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information
regarding holder conversion rights.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance
that information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in accordance with SEC
requirements, accumulated and communicated to appropriate management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, allowing for timely decisions regarding
disclosures. We recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving desired control objectives. Judgment
is required when designing and evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of potential controls and
procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, with the supervision and participation of
management, including the CEO and CFO, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. Our
evaluation excludes WagerWorks, Inc., acquired on August 25, 2005, comprising less than 1.0% of
consolidated revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2006 and 2.5% of consolidated assets as
of June 30, 2006.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As a part of our normal operations, we update our internal controls as necessary to accommodate
any modifications to our business processes or accounting procedures. No changes occurred during
the most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
31
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 13 of our Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated by reference in response to this item.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Convertible Debentures Exchange
On April 4, 2006, IGT entered into a new indenture as a result of exchanging our old Debentures for
an equal aggregate principal amount at maturity of new Debentures and an exchange fee of $2.51 per
Debenture. In the aggregate, $964.8 million, or 99.5%, of the old Debentures principal amount at
maturity were tendered and accepted for exchange. The terms of the new Debentures are
substantially similar to the old Debentures, except that the new Debentures include a net share
settlement feature requiring us to satisfy our conversion obligation to holders in cash, per the
terms of the indenture up to the accreted principal amount and in common shares for any remaining
conversion value. For additional information, including registration exemption and terms of
conversion, refer to our Form 8-K filed on April 5, 2006.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Under the 1990 IGT common stock repurchase plan, as amended and adjusted for stock splits, our
remaining share repurchase authorization totaled 17.7 million at June 30, 2006. The stock
repurchase authorization is used to return value to our shareholders and reduce the number of
shares outstanding. The shares may be repurchased in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions, depending on market conditions and other factors.
Shares purchased in the table below exclude treasury shares acquired in non-cash transactions
related to forfeited stock awards or shares exchanged for options exercised. We repurchased an additional 0.3 million shares
from the end of our third quarter through August 3, 2006 at an average price of $38.24 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Shares Still |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
as part of a |
|
|
Available for |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under the |
|
Periods |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Plan |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2
April 29, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
April 30
May 27, 2006 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
35.81 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
May 28
July 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
35.81 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
32
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange
Act, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
33
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date:
August 8, 2006
INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY
/s/ Maureen Mullarkey
Maureen T. Mullarkey
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
34
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange
Act, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(a) of the Exchange Act, as
adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a 14(b) of the Exchange Act and
section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |